Podcasts about jml

Spring means baseball is back in my life, and if there's anything that's almost as good as baseball, it's writing about baseball. There is so much good writing about baseball – music, poetry, literature, biography, essay, plays, movie scripts. Something about the combination sport's long history, its leisurely pace, its connection to childhood, its outdoor setting in beautiful weather, its daily rhythm make it such a fruitful topic in American arts and letters. Our guest today, the writer John W. Miller, has entered the pantheon of great baseball writing with his new biography of Earl Weaver, manager of the Baltimore Orioles from 1968 to 1982 and one of the game's most colorful figures ever. The book, which is titled “The Last Manager: How Earl Weaver Tricked, Tormented, and Reinvented Baseball” is so good that it shot up to number 7 on the New York Times bestseller list the week after it was released. And it's not just for baseball fans, either – it's a fascinating snapshot of American culture in the middle of the 20th century and a striking portrait of an almost Shakespearean-level character. John is not only a New York Times bestselling author. He's also a contributing writer to America Magazine and one of the most devoted members of our Jesuit Media Lab community. (He even put the JML in the book's acknowledgments section!) Host Mike Jordan Laskey asked John to tell us about Earl Weaver and to describe his reporting and writing process. They also talked about the spirituality of baseball and biography writing. Get a copy wherever books are sold, and have a great Opening Day. "The Last Manager": https://www.amazon.com/Last-Manager-Tormented-Reinvented-Baseball/dp/1668030926 "How I Found God in a Game of Catch": https://www.jesuits.org/stories/how-i-found-god-in-a-game-of-catch/ John W. Miller: https://www.johnwmiller.org/ John's writing for America Magazine: https://www.americamagazine.org/voices/john-w-miller AMDG is a production of the Jesuit Media Lab, which is a project of the Jesuit Conference of Canada and the United States. www.jesuits.org/ www.beajesuit.org/ twitter.com/jesuitnews facebook.com/Jesuits instagram.com/wearethejesuits youtube.com/societyofjesus www.jesuitmedialab.org/

In this episode, Teyonce Allison '25 talks with Professor Jonathan Miller-Lane. Professor Miller-Lane, known affectionately as “JML,” teaches education studies at Middlebury and is a facilitator in the Engaged Listening Project, a professional development program for faculty and staff. Prof. Miller-Lane discusses his upbringing in various countries as son of a foreign service officer and how that shaped his understanding of culture, hospitality, race, and conflict. The discussion explores the role of higher education in supporting and preparing students. They discuss lessons from diplomacy about how to create a welcoming, structured environment as well as the challenges of integrating skills for constructive conflict across a student body with different goals and backgrounds. Learn more about Professor Miller-Lane here: https://www.middlebury.edu/college/people/jonathan-miller-lane Learn more about the Engaged Listening Project here: https://www.middlebury.edu/conflict-transformation/engaged-listening-project

Joseph Michael Lopez - JML, (b. 1973) is an independent photographer born in New York City to a Puerto Rican father and a mother who escaped the Cuban Revolution in 1967. He earned his MFA in 2011 at Columbia University. Lopez began his career as an analog cinematographer on the critically acclaimed Bruce Weber film, Chop Suey (2001). Currently, Joseph divides his time between long-form projects, teaching, and commercial work. His photographs have appeared on the covers of M, The Magazine for Leica M Photography, Leica Fotografie International, The Sunday Review of The New York Times, New York magazine and The New Yorker, among others.Joseph's photographs were on exhibit in “Cuban Photography after 1980: Selections from the Museum's Collection”, at The Museum of Fine Arts in Houston. In 2016, a commissioned series of his photographs of New York neighborhoods, “New York at Its Core: Future City Lab”, was installed at The Museum of the City of New York. Photographs from JML NYC, the series from which this commission originated, have also been published in the book Bystander: A History of Street Photography, by Colin Westerbeck and Joel Meyerowitz. JML's first book JML NYC 02-23 was published by GOST in the fall of 2024.  In episode 250, Joseph discusses, among other things:Relocating to Rome from NYCHis intro to NYC via assisting Bruce WeberHis early career as a professional assistantShooting with his Leica as a ‘coping mechanism'The challenge of creating a cohesive narrative from 20 years of single imagesHis Dear New Yorker projectWhy B&W is where his heart is atHow what we see is who we areHis approach towards light and sunUsing digital vs. filmAssisting Mitch EpsteinHow his opinion on grad school has changedControversy surrounding Columbia University prof. Thomas RomaHis plans for working in Rome and going forward Referenced:Bruce WeberDanny Lyon, Knave of HeartsTodd PapageorgeChuck Kelton's darkroomMitch EpsteinThomas RomaMohammad Rasoulof Website | Instagram“Essentially, it's about saying something and having a voice and having a perception of the world that is, like singing a loud song you know, your pictures have to say something. And how do you separate yourself from all the noise that's out there already? You have to have an obsessive, empahtic way to perceive things. I think to a certain extent what we see is who we are in a way.” Become a full tier 1 member here to access exclusive additional subscriber-only content and the full archive of previous episodes for £5 per month.For the tier 2 archive-only membership, to access the full library of past episodes for £3 per month, go here.Subscribe to my weekly newsletter here for everything A Small Voice related and much more besides.Follow me on Instagram here.Build Yourself a Squarespace Website video course here.

The Hart Trophy winner got better? JML thinks so. 

0:00 - Vic explained another wrinkle in the process of finding money to pay college players.13:23 - The A's are nearing their final days in Oakland. Vic and Mose share their favorite memories of that dump of a collesium.31:58 - JML joined us to preview the festivities of Avalanche Alumni weekend, and he wasn't in his wine cave! It was very unsettling, honestly. 

After years of frustration with the public schools, and watching the ways that politics have slowly found their way into classrooms people like Stephanie Lindsey are a breath of fresh air. She shared some of the same concerns, so after years in the education field launched the JML school that targets students as individuals rather than numbers and data points right here in Wickenburg Arizona. (But available anywhere online)

Anthony Diana and Samantha Walsh are joined by Lighthouse's Chris Baird as part of our series on what legal teams need to know about Microsoft 365 AI-driven productivity tool, Copilot. This episode presents an overview of the risks relating to Copilot's access to and use of privileged and sensitive data and how businesses can mitigate these risks, including using Microsoft 365's access control tools and user training.  In particular, the episode provides in-depth information about Microsoft 365's sensitivity labels and how they can be used to refine a business's approach to managing risk associated with privileged and sensitive data stored in Microsoft 365. ----more---- Transcript: Intro: Hello, and welcome to Tech Law Talks, a podcast brought to you by Reed Smith's Emerging Technologies Group. In each episode of this podcast, we will discuss cutting edge issues on technology, data, and the law. We will provide practical observations on a wide variety of technology and data topics to give you quick and actionable tips to address the issues you are dealing with every day.  Anthony: Hello, this is Anthony Diana, a partner here in Reed Smith's Emerging Technologies group, and welcome to Tech Law Talks and our podcast series on AI for legal departments with a focus on managing legal and regulatory risks with Microsoft Copilot that Reed Smith is presenting with Lighthouse. With me today are Sam Walsh from Reed Smith's Emerging Technologies Group and Chris Baird from Lighthouse. Welcome, guys. Just to level set, Copilot is sort of the AI tool that Microsoft has launched relatively recently to improve productivity within the Microsoft environment. There are a number of risks that we went through in a previous podcast that you have to consider, particularly legal departments, when you're launching Copilot within your organization. And let me just start to level set with Chris, if you could give a little bit of a technical background on how Copilot works.  Chris: Absolutely, Anthony. So thanks Thanks for having me. So I guess a couple of key points, because as we go through this conversation, things are going to come up around how Copilot is used. And you touched on it there. The key objective is to increase, improve data quality, increase productivity. So we want really good data in, want to maximize the data that we've got at our disposal and make the most of that data, make it available to Copilot. But we want to do so in a way that we're not oversharing data. We're not getting bad legacy data in, you know, stale data. And we're not getting data from departments that maybe we shouldn't have pulled it in, right? So that's one of the key things. We all know what Copilot does. In terms of its architecture, so think about it. You're in your Canvas, whatever your favorite Canvas is. It's Microsoft Word, it's Teams, it's PowerPoint. You're going to ask Copilot to give you some information to help you with a task, right? And the first piece of the architecture is you're going to make that request. Copilot's going to send a request into your Microsoft 365 tenant. Where is your data? It's going to use APIs. It's going to hit the Graph API. There's a whole semantic layer around that. And it's going to say, hey, I've got this guy, Chris. He wants to get access to this data. He's asking me this question. Have you got his data? And the first thing, really, there's this important term Microsoft use. They call it grounding. When you make your request into Copilot, whatever you request, you're going to get data back that's grounded to you. So you're not going to get data back from an open AI model, from Bing AI. You're only going to get data that's available to you. The issue with that is if you've got access to data you didn't know you had, you know, through poor governance. Maybe somebody shared a link with you two years ago. That data is going to be available to you as well. But what's going to happen, a few clever things happen from an architecture perspective. The graph gives a response. It says, hey, I've got Chris's data. It looks like this. That's going to go into the large language model. That's going to make it look beautiful and pass you all that data back in a way you can understand it. There's a final check that Copilot does at that point. It goes back to the graph and it says, I've got this response. I need to give it to the user. user, are there any compliance actions I need to perform on this response before I give it? And I think that's what we're going to focus on a lot today, Anthony, right? But the important thing is thinking about that grounding. And the one message I want to give to people listening is really, you know, don't be immediately scared and worried of Copilot. It respects a lot of the controls that are in there already. The challenge is if you have poor access control and governance, there are things that you need to work on.  Anthony: Yeah. And I think that's one of the challenges. I think a lot of legal departments don't know what access controls and what controls that the IT department has put in place into M365. And I think that's one of the things that you have to understand, right? I think that's one of the things we'll be talking about today is the importance of that. out. So Sam, just talking about what we're our focus today, which is on the risks associated with privileged information, highly confidential information, sensitive information. So can you just give a just a brief description of what those risks are?  Samantha: Sure. So I think one of the risks Chris just alluded to that Copilot is going to have access to information that you have access to, whether you know it or not. And so if you have privileged information that is sort of protected by just being in a spot maybe where people don't know it's there, but it's not necessarily controlled in terms of access, that could be coming up when people are using Copilot. I think another thing is Copilot returning information to people, you lose a bit of context for the information. And when you're talking about privilege and other types of sensitivity, sometimes you need some clues to alert you to the privilege or to the sensitive nature of the information. And if you're just getting a document sort of from the ether, and you don't know, you know, where it came from, and who put it there, you know, you're obscuring that sort of sensitive nature of the document potentially.  Anthony: Yeah. And then I guess the fear there is that you don't realize that it's privileged or highly confidential and you start sharing it, which causes all kinds of issues. And I think just generally for everyone is the regulators. And I think both on the privacy side, where there's a lot of concern about where you're using AI against personal information or highly sensitive personal information, as well as the SEC, which is very focused on material, not public information and how you're using AI against it. I think one of the things that people are going to be asking, the regulators are going to be saying, what controls do you have in place to make sure that it's not being used inappropriately? So again, I think that sets the groundwork for why we think this is important and you start setting things up. So one of the first things you do, let's talk about how you can manage the risk. I think one of the things you can do, right, which is pretty simple, is training, right? Like the users have to know how to do it. So Sam, what should they be thinking about in terms of training for this?  Samantha: I think you can sort of train users both on the inputs and maybe on what they're doing with the outputs from Copilot. I think there are certainly ways to prompt Copilot that maybe would reduce the risk that you're going to get just this information flooding in from parts unknown. known. And I think having clear rules about vetting of co-pilot responses or limitations on sort of just indiscriminately sharing co-pilot responses, you know, these are all kinds of things that you can train users in to try to sort of mitigate some of the data risk.  Anthony: Yeah, no, absolutely. And I think we're also seeing people just so in doing this and launching it, having user agreements that sort of say the same thing, right? What are the key risks? The user agreement says, make sure you're aware of these risks, including the risks that we've been talking about with sensitive information and how to use it. Okay, so now let's switch to more sort of from a technical perspective, some things you can do within the M365 environment to sort of protect this highly confidential information or sensitive information. Information so let's start with Chris sort of this concept of which i know is in there when you have a SharePoint online site or a team site that has a SharePoint online site i think one of the one of the things you can do is basically exclude those sites from co-pilot so if you give us a little a brief description of what that means and then a little bit about the pros and cons.  Chris: Yeah of course Anthony so that that control by the way that's that's nothing new. So for anybody that's administered SharePoint, you've always had the ability to control whether a site appears in search results or not. So it is that control, right? It's excluding sites from being available via search and via Copilot. You would do that at the SharePoint site level. So, you know, Microsoft makes that available. There's a couple of other controls, maybe one I'll mention in a second as well. These are kind of, I don't want to call it knee-jerk reaction, I guess I just did, but it's what are the quick things you can do if you want to get access to Copilot quickly and you're worried about some really sensitive information. And it is a knee-jerk, right? It's a sledgehammer to crack a door. You're going to turn off entire access to that whole site. But in reality, that site may have some real gems of data in that you want it to make accessible to Copilot. And you're going to miss that. The other quick win that's similar to that one, there's a product called Double Key Encryption. A lot of the products I'm going to talk about today are part of the Microsoft Purview stack. And as part of MIP, which is Microsoft Information Protection, we're definitely going to cover that, Anthony, shortly about labels. One thing you can do with the label is you can apply something called Double Key Encryption. And you would use your own encryption key. And that means Microsoft cannot see your data. So if you know you've got pockets of data that are really secret, really sensitive, but you want to activate Copilot quickly, you've got these options. You can disable a site from being available at search level. That's option one. The other option is at a data level. You can label it all as secret. That data is not going to be accessible at all to Copilot. But like I say, these are kind of really quick things that you can do that don't really fix the problem in the long term. don't help you get the best out of Copilot. The reason you're investing in Copilot is to get access to good quality data and hiding that data is a problem.  Anthony: Yeah. And I think one of the things that, and Microsoft has basically said, even though it's available, they've been pretty open about saying, this is not the way you should be managing the risks that we're talking about here. Because you do lose some functionality in that SharePoint site if you take it out of search. So it's an option if you're rushing. And that's basically why they said, If you frankly aren't comfortable and you haven't have all the controls in place and you really have certain data that you want excluded, it's an option. But I think, as you said, it's a sort of a knee-jerk short-term option if you really have to launch, but it's not a long-term solution. So, now let's focus a little bit on what they think is the right way to do it, which is, and first let's talk about the site level. I think you talked a little bit about this, is putting in this concept of a sensitivity label on a site. Now, before you do that, which we could talk about, is first you have to identify the site. So, Chris, why don't you talk a little bit about that, and then let's talk a little bit about the technical.  Chris: No, absolutely. So a couple of terminology things. When I talk about data classification, I'm talking about something different to applying a label. When I often say to a lot of my clients, data classification, they think, oh, that's confidential, highly confidential secret. What I mean when I talk about data classification is what is the data in its business context? What does it mean to the organization? Let's understand who the data owner is, what the risk of that data is if it falls into the wrong hands. What are the obligations around processing and handling and storing that data? How do we lifecycle it? So simple things would be, really simple things would be social security numbers, names, addresses, right? We're identifying data types. We can then build that up. We can move on from those simple things and we can do some really clever things to identify documents by their overall type, their shape, their structure. We can use machine learning models to train, to look for specific documents, case files, legal files, customer files, client files, right? We can train these machine learning classifiers. But the great thing is if you get a good handle on your classification, you will be able to discover and understand your data risk across your enterprise. So you'll see there are tools within Microsoft 365 Purview, Content Explorer, data classification. These tools will give you insights into SharePoint sites that you have in your organization that have high amounts of social security numbers, high amounts of case files, legal affairs documents, right? It's going to come back and tell you, these are the sites that have this type of information. And you can do that analysis. You don't have to go out and say, guys, you've got to put your hand up and tell us if you've got a SharePoint site with this information. The administrators, the guys that are running Purview, they can do that discovery and reach out to the business and go and discuss that SharePoint site. But Anthony, what you're talking about there is once you've identified that SharePoint site, you know, if we know we've got a SharePoint site that contains specific case files that are highly confidential, we can apply a highly confidential label to that site. And the label does a number of things. It visually marks the file, right? And what I mean by that, at a file level from a metadata perspective, anybody interacting with that file electronically will receive a pop-up dialogue on a ribbon or a pop-up. It's going to be front and center to say this file is labeled as highly confidential. I've also got options, which I'm sure we've all done before in the day-to-day work. You can mark the document itself across. You can put a watermark across the document to say it's highly confidential. You can put headers and footers on. So the label isn't just this little concept, but it takes it a step further even more. And this is where it really, really works with Copilot is you can define custom permissions at a label level. So we can say for highly confidential labels, we might have a label for a particular case, a particular project. And if it is a case label, then we could give permissions to only the people involved in that case. So only those people can open that file and that means only those people can talk about that file to copilot you know if you're not in that case Anthony if you're not part of that case and me and Sam are and i use that label you're going to ask copilot to give you all the information it can about that case you're not going to get any information back because you don't have the permissions that's on that source file so that's that's one of the first things that we can do is we can take that label and apply it to a sharepoint site and that's going to apply a default label across all the documents that are in that site. What we're really talking about here, by the way, when we talk about labels, is we're trying to plug a hole in access control and governance. So think about SharePoint management and hygiene. The issue is SharePoint has just grown exponentially for many organizations. You know, there's organic growth, you've got SharePoint migrations, but then you have this explosion of use once you're on SharePoint online. There's going to be public sites. There's going to be SharePoint sites that are public, that are available to everybody in your organization. There'll be poor JML processes, join and move and leave processes, where people who move departments, their access isn't revoked from a SharePoint site. The issue with Copilot is if the site access control isn't strict, if it's open and the file doesn't have permissions on the file, Copilot is going to be able to see that file. If it's public, it's going to be able to see that file, right? So with the label, where that differs to the permissions is it puts the access controls on the files that are in that SharePoint site directly. So if you lift those files from that site, if it is a public site and I take those files, I put it in another SharePoint site or I put it on my laptop, it carries the access control with it. And that's what's really important. That means that wherever that file goes, it's going to be hidden from Copilot if I don't have that access. That's the important thing. So, you know, sensitivity labels are a huge part of ensuring compliance for co-pilot, probably the biggest first step organizations can take, And I think you touch on the first step quite nicely, Anthony. A lot of our clients say, well, we're scared of labeling everything in the organization, going out immediately, doing all that discovery, labeling everything, right? Maybe just knock off the top SharePoint sites, the ones that you know contain the most sensitive data. Start there. Start applying those labels there.  Anthony: Yeah, and Sam, we've talked with some clients about using their provisioning process or attestation process, process lifecycle management to start gathering this information because it's a big project, right? If you have thousands of sites, the concept of figuring out which ones have that. Obviously, Chris talked about, so the technical way you could do it, which would be fantastic because that obviously, but there are other ways of low-tech ways of doing this.  Samantha: Right. Just kind of relying on your human resources to maybe take a little bit more of a manual approach to speaking up about what kind of sensitive data they have and where they're putting it.  Anthony: Which they may be doing already, right? I think that's one of the things that you have to track is like they may, an organization, you know, a specific business line may know where their data is. They just haven't told, they haven't told IT to do something with it. So I think it's just getting that information, gathering it through, you know, whether it's the provisioning process, you could do an attestation or survey or whatever, just to start. And then as Chris said, once you have an idea of what the highly confidential information sites are, then you start doing the work. And again, I think it's applying the labels. One of the things that I think, just to emphasize, and I want to make sure people understand this, is in the sensitivity labels, it's not an all or nothing. At least what I've seen, Chris, is that for each sensitivity label, right, and you could have different types of highly confidential information. Maybe it's sensitive personal information, maybe a material non-public information. Whatever it is, privileged information, you can have different settings. So, for example, you can have it where the site is in essence like a read-only, right, where nobody can touch it, nobody can transfer the data, you can't copy it. That's the most extreme. But then you can have others where it's a little bit more permissive. And as you said, you can tailor it so it could be, you know, certain people have it, certain groups or security groups or whatever, how you want to play. But there is some flexibility there. And I think that's where the legal departments have to get, you know, really talk to the IT folks and really look and figure out what are the options for just not just applying the sensitivity label, but what restrictions do we want to have in place for this?  Chris: Anthony as well like you know you you're touching on the really important thing there and I'm going to go back to what Sam had talked about earlier with training as well about culture but I guess you know the the important thing is finding the balance right so with a sensitivity label you are able as an administrator as an IT administrator you can define the permissions for that label so like I say you could have a high level and by the way you can have sub labels as well so let's go with a common scheme that we see, public, internal, confidential, highly confidential. We've got four labels. Highly confidential could be a parent label. And when we click on that, we get a number of sub labels and we could have sub labels for cases. We could have sub labels for departments. And at an administrative level, each of those labels can carry its own predefined permission. So the administrator defines those permissions. And exactly as you say, Anthony, you know, one of the great things about it, it's not just who can access it, it's what can they do with it. Do not forward, block reply to all. You can block screen share screen copy all of those kind of things save and edit it can block all of those things where i say you need to find a balance is that's going to become onerous for the administrator if every time there's a case you're going back for a new label for each case and you're going to end up with thousands of labels right so what microsoft gives you is an option to allow the users to define the permissions themselves and this is where it really works well for copilot but before i talk about what that option is i want to go back to what Sam said and talking about the training. One of the important things for me is really fostering a culture of data protection across the organization, making people realize the risk around their data, having frequent training, make that training fun, make it interactive if you can. At Lighthouse, our training is, it's kind of a Netflix style. There's some great coffee shop things where it's fun. We get to watch these little clips. But if you make people want to protect their data, when they realize data is going to be available to co-pilot now, they'll be invested in it, right? They'll want to work with you. So then when you come to do the training, Sam, you need to say, right, we're not going to use the administrative defined labels. It's too much burden on the admin. We're going to publish this label for highly confidential that allows the users to define the permissions themselves. And that's going to pop up in Word. If you're in your favorite canvas, you're in Word, you click highly confidential, it's going to pop up and say, what permissions do you want to set on this file? If you haven't trained, if you haven't fostered that culture of information protection amongst the user community, people are going to hate it, right? People aren't going to like that. So it's so important to start to engage and discuss and train and coach and just develop that culture. But when it's developed, people love it. People want to define the permissions. They want to be prescriptive. They want to make sure that information cannot be copied and extracted and so on. And anything you do at that level, again, it protects that data from being read in by Copilot. That's bringing that back to the whole purpose of it.  Anthony: And I would just say, again, that this all goes about prioritization because people are like, I have 50,000 people in my organization. There's no way I'm going to train everybody. You don't. I mean, obviously some, but there's only certain people who should have access to certain of this information, right? So you may want to train your HR people because they have a lot of the personal sensitive information, the benefits folks or whatever, because you have to break it down because I think a lot of people get caught up into, I'm never going to have 50,000 people do this, but you don't. Everyone has different things that come across their desk based on the business process that you're working on. So again, it's just thinking logically about this and prioritizing because I think people think training and, oh my God, I'm relying on the user and this is going to be too much. I think to your point is if you do it in chunks and say, okay, here's a business line that we think is really high risk, just train them on that. And like you said, it's part of their job, right? HR is not going to have like compensation. They're not throwing that everywhere in the organization. They shouldn't be right. But if they do, they know they're sensitive about it. And now you're just giving a tool, right? We know you want to protect this. Here's the tool to do it. So again, I think this is really important. Before we end I know, Chris, I think you had one more thing that you want to add, which was on the monitor monitoring side, which I had not heard of, but could you just talk a little bit about that?  Chris: You know, this is sort of really key information that you can think of going up to your leaders in your organization to say, look, we've got a roadmap for co-pilot adoption. It's X many months or however long it's going to take, but now we can implement some quick wins that really give us visibility. So there's a product, there's two products. Many of the listeners will probably know the second product that I'm about to talk about, but the first one might be new. There's a product called Communication Compliance. It's part of the Microsoft E5 or E5 Compliance or IP and Governance Suite. It's in Purview. Technically speaking, it's a digital surveillance product that looks at communications through Teams and throughout Look and through Viva. But what Microsoft has introduced, and this is a stroke of genius, it really is, they've introduced co-pilot monitoring. So the prompt and the responses for co-pilot can now be monitored by communication compliance. And what that means is we can create simple policies that say, if personal information, client information, case information. Is passed through a prompt or a response in Copilot. Let us know about it. We can take it a step further. If we get the sensitivity labels in, we can use the sensitivity labels as the condition on the policy as well. So now if we start to see highly confidential information spilling over in a Copilot response, we can get an alert on that as well. And that I think is just for many of the listeners, it's a quick win. You can go, cause you're going to be your CIO or, or, you know, your VP is going to be saying, we need Copilot. We want to use Copilot. that your CISO and your IT guys are saying, slow down. You can go to the CISOs and say, we've got some controls, guys. It's okay. Now, the other tool, which a lot of the listeners will know about is eDiscovery Premium. What you can do with communication compliance once you're alerted is you can raise a case in eDiscovery Premium to say, go and investigate that particular alert. And what that means is we can use the eDiscovery tools to do a search, a collection. We can export and download. We can look at a forensic level. What information came back in the response? And if it was data spillage, if that data came from a repository that we thought was secure, specific to some case or legal information, and now it's in the hands of a public-facing team in the organization, you can use the tools. You can use eDiscovery through the Graph API to go and delete that data, that newly created data. So two real quick wins there to think about is deploying communication compliance with eDiscovery.  Anthony: That's fantastic. Well, thanks, everybody. This was really helpful. We're going to have additional podcasts. We'll probably talk about e-discovery and retention alike in our next one. But thank you, Chris and Sam. This was highly informative. And thanks to our listeners. Welcome back. We hope you keep listening to our podcast. Thanks.  Outro: Tech Law Talks is a Reed Smith production. Our producers are Ali McCardell and Shannon Ryan. For more information about Reed Smith's Emerging Technologies practice, please email techlawtalks@reedsmith.com. You can find our podcasts on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, reedsmith.com, and our social media accounts.  Disclaimer: This podcast is provided for educational purposes. It does not constitute legal advice and is not intended to establish an attorney-client relationship, nor is it intended to suggest or establish standards of care applicable to particular lawyers in any given situation. All rights reserved. Transcript is auto-generated.

The Advertising Standards Authority has had a busy week of complaints, including bans for Nationwide and JML, its second in seven days.Campaign's editorial team discusses the banned ads alongside others that have garnered ASA complaints and extreme responses, including ads from the Alzheimer's Society and Andrex, which was Campaign's Pick of the Week.We also give you the headlines from media and creativity, including Amazon's media pitch shortlist and the Asos creative review.This episode was hosted by tech editor Lucy Shelley and featured media editor Beau Jackson and reporter Charlotte Rawlings.Further reading:Nationwide campaign banned over ‘misleading' branch closure claimsAlzheimer's Society TV ad prompts 128 complaints to the ASAASA bans second JML ad within a weekPick of the Week: Andrex breaks the toilet ta-poo with styleCALM educating the nation on suicide shows strength of strategy and creative Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

The ideal of ‘conversation' recurs in modern thought as a symbol and practice central to ethics, democratic politics, and thinking itself. Interweaving readings of fiction and philosophy in a ‘conversational' style inspired by Stanley Cavell, Fiction, Philosophy and the Ideal of Conversation (Edinburgh UP, 2023) clarifies this lofty yet vague ideal, while developing a revitalizing model for interdisciplinary literary studies. It argues that conversation is key to exemplary responses to sceptical doubt in ordinary language and political philosophy – where scepticism threatens ethics and democratic politics – and in works of British fiction spanning from Jane Austen through Ali Smith. It shows that for these writers, conversation can shift attention from metaphysical doubts regarding our capacity to know ‘reality' and other people, to ethical, democratic, and aesthetic action. The book moreover proposes – and models – ‘conversational criticism' as a framework linking literary studies to broader political and ethical commitments, while remaining responsive to aesthetic form. Erin Elizabeth Greer is an Assistant Professor of Literature at the University of Texas at Dallas. She teaches and writes about modern and contemporary British and Anglophone literature, ordinary language philosophy, political philosophy, feminist theory, and critical new media studies. Her work has appeared or is forthcoming in Contemporary Literature, JML, Camera Obscura, Salmagundi, and Stanley Cavell and Aesthetic Experience. Tong He is Lecturer of English at Central China Normal University. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

The ideal of ‘conversation' recurs in modern thought as a symbol and practice central to ethics, democratic politics, and thinking itself. Interweaving readings of fiction and philosophy in a ‘conversational' style inspired by Stanley Cavell, Fiction, Philosophy and the Ideal of Conversation (Edinburgh UP, 2023) clarifies this lofty yet vague ideal, while developing a revitalizing model for interdisciplinary literary studies. It argues that conversation is key to exemplary responses to sceptical doubt in ordinary language and political philosophy – where scepticism threatens ethics and democratic politics – and in works of British fiction spanning from Jane Austen through Ali Smith. It shows that for these writers, conversation can shift attention from metaphysical doubts regarding our capacity to know ‘reality' and other people, to ethical, democratic, and aesthetic action. The book moreover proposes – and models – ‘conversational criticism' as a framework linking literary studies to broader political and ethical commitments, while remaining responsive to aesthetic form. Erin Elizabeth Greer is an Assistant Professor of Literature at the University of Texas at Dallas. She teaches and writes about modern and contemporary British and Anglophone literature, ordinary language philosophy, political philosophy, feminist theory, and critical new media studies. Her work has appeared or is forthcoming in Contemporary Literature, JML, Camera Obscura, Salmagundi, and Stanley Cavell and Aesthetic Experience. Tong He is Lecturer of English at Central China Normal University. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/intellectual-history

The ideal of ‘conversation' recurs in modern thought as a symbol and practice central to ethics, democratic politics, and thinking itself. Interweaving readings of fiction and philosophy in a ‘conversational' style inspired by Stanley Cavell, Fiction, Philosophy and the Ideal of Conversation (Edinburgh UP, 2023) clarifies this lofty yet vague ideal, while developing a revitalizing model for interdisciplinary literary studies. It argues that conversation is key to exemplary responses to sceptical doubt in ordinary language and political philosophy – where scepticism threatens ethics and democratic politics – and in works of British fiction spanning from Jane Austen through Ali Smith. It shows that for these writers, conversation can shift attention from metaphysical doubts regarding our capacity to know ‘reality' and other people, to ethical, democratic, and aesthetic action. The book moreover proposes – and models – ‘conversational criticism' as a framework linking literary studies to broader political and ethical commitments, while remaining responsive to aesthetic form. Erin Elizabeth Greer is an Assistant Professor of Literature at the University of Texas at Dallas. She teaches and writes about modern and contemporary British and Anglophone literature, ordinary language philosophy, political philosophy, feminist theory, and critical new media studies. Her work has appeared or is forthcoming in Contemporary Literature, JML, Camera Obscura, Salmagundi, and Stanley Cavell and Aesthetic Experience. Tong He is Lecturer of English at Central China Normal University. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/language

The ideal of ‘conversation' recurs in modern thought as a symbol and practice central to ethics, democratic politics, and thinking itself. Interweaving readings of fiction and philosophy in a ‘conversational' style inspired by Stanley Cavell, Fiction, Philosophy and the Ideal of Conversation (Edinburgh UP, 2023) clarifies this lofty yet vague ideal, while developing a revitalizing model for interdisciplinary literary studies. It argues that conversation is key to exemplary responses to sceptical doubt in ordinary language and political philosophy – where scepticism threatens ethics and democratic politics – and in works of British fiction spanning from Jane Austen through Ali Smith. It shows that for these writers, conversation can shift attention from metaphysical doubts regarding our capacity to know ‘reality' and other people, to ethical, democratic, and aesthetic action. The book moreover proposes – and models – ‘conversational criticism' as a framework linking literary studies to broader political and ethical commitments, while remaining responsive to aesthetic form. Erin Elizabeth Greer is an Assistant Professor of Literature at the University of Texas at Dallas. She teaches and writes about modern and contemporary British and Anglophone literature, ordinary language philosophy, political philosophy, feminist theory, and critical new media studies. Her work has appeared or is forthcoming in Contemporary Literature, JML, Camera Obscura, Salmagundi, and Stanley Cavell and Aesthetic Experience. Tong He is Lecturer of English at Central China Normal University. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/communications

Back with the king of guest hosts The JML to talk about West Coast Pro Monster and Stardom Nagoya Big Winter

This is a special two part ep with two of the most favorite guest of the podcast The JML and Joesph Monstercillo. J is on to talk about the state of women's wrestling through the very funny PWI 250 list. The second part it about KT Dan Bokura Wa Kakuto Tanteidan show which produced the current MOTY

How did medieval lapidaries smuggle Arabic esoteric knowledge into Europe? What was the Arabic Hermetica corpus found in Europe 100 years before the Picatrix (Ghayat al-Hakim)? Vajra Regan - medieval scholar, author and researcher - shares about his latest research and new article published in The Journal of Medieval Latin earlier this year. ⇓ ⇓ ⇓✅►Get your copy of Vajra's article - https://www.brepolsonline.net/doi/epdf/10.1484/J.JML.5.133617?role=tab✅►Get the entire Journal of Medieval Latin volume - https://www.brepols.net/products/IS-9782503603780-1 ✦

On this episode of the Desert Island Comp Series we bring on someone who is essentially a rotating third chair host, JML. The official Q&T Are Stardom Correspondent. One of the runners behind the WON HOF

This week on the Breaking Britain podcast, we examine the economic dilemmas the UK faces in an increasingly competitive global landscape. Joining us is John Mills, who as a senior figure in the world of business and author exploring the global economy who has written extensively to make the case for Brexit as a potentially transformative economic project.John Mills is founder and Chairman of JML, a consumer goods distribution company, which exports to more than 70 countries around the world. He is also an economist and author, noted for his writing on Brexit, the Labour Party and exchange rate policy. A lifelong Labour Party supporter, John has over the years played a prominent role in UK policy debates and was a  Co-Chair of Vote Leave and Chair of Labour Leave during the campaign over the UK's future in the EU in 2016. He was also national agent for the ‘No' campaign during the 1975 Referendum on the UK joining the European Economic Community (EEC).With his long experience of the challenges societies face at a time of accelerating globalisation, John Mills can help provide key insights into how UK governments can kickstart economic growth that has stagnated for too long.The background music is 'Through the City' by Crowander, and the production for this podcast was by Daniel Mansfield.  

Baseball Junkies Episode 181. 19 Days until opening day!2. World Baseball Classic news3. Spring Training News4. Hobby News5. Baseball talk with Jml and Fire Frank  @THEJMLEXPERIENCE  *****For JML's Breaks check out https://www.thejmlexperienceshop.com/  *******PODCAST LINK - LISTEN ON YOUR FAVORTIE FORMAThttps://feeds.buzzsprout.com/2066614.rssYoutube link for podcast: https://youtu.be/3EaIs-O0A5Q#baseballcards #cardmunity #topps #paniniamerica #sportscards #giveaway #sportscards #podcast #podcasts #podcastlife  Discord: Cardmunity Inc. https://discord.gg/4k4TPncWDiscord: Union of Trading Card and Comic Book Collectors https://discord.gg/dM8849snn3*****************WHATNOT LINK ***********************https://whatnot.com/invite/aleagueofherownCard Shellz https://card-shellz.myshopify.com?sca_ref=2363484.JmINoFrEVhInstagram: @aleagueofherown_youtubeEmail: adrian_vargas_25@hotmail.comThanks for listening! Watch these podcast live or on replay @YouTube Channel - A League of Her Own - A League of Her Own - YouTubeOther Social Media Links for Hosts:Youtube channel- Mr. Enfuego - Mr. Enfuego - YouTubeInstagram Adrian Vargas-Penner (@aleagueofherown_youtube) • Instagram photos and videosInstagram Anthony Rodriguez (@enfuego79) • Instagram photos and videos

Join us on a journey through the rich history of Talmudic manuscripts and print editions. You will learn that although we don't have manuscripts that can be definitively dated to before the twelfth century, a discerning eye can use extant manuscripts to hear distinct echoes of much older ones. Delve into the fascinating stories linked to the little-known Spanish and Portuguese printings that coincided with the end of Jewish life on the Iberian Peninsula and to Soncino's controversial decision to place Tosafos on the page of the Gemara. Discover the introduction of folio numbers by Daniel Bomberg, and join us in the search for the first rabbi to utilize this revolutionary system. Finally, we'll delve into the heartbreaking story of the burning of the Talmud in 1553 and the draconian censorship that followed, culminating in the notorious Basel edition. This lecture was recorded live by Jewish Multimedia Library, a.k.a. JML, Melbourne, Australia. Many additional recordings are available from their website: www.jml.org.au. History and Development of the Talmudic Page

Double Special guest co-host Soccer Evan on 1st to review DDT Never Mind then the ace-st of guest The JML on to talk about Stardom Dream Queendom. Had to do a special double ep.

The pre-print manuscripts of Tanya shed light on what the Alter Rebbe added to this seminal text at a later stage. Curiously, three of the most notable updates involve interpersonal relationships. This lecture was recorded live by Jewish Multimedia Library, a.k.a. JML, Melbourne Australia. Many additional recordings are available from their website: www.jml.org.au. Evolution of the Tanya: Timely Lessons from the Eighteenth-Century Battle against Chasidism

Tonight marks a special event for the Old Mans Cantina. Our first live stream...everything that can go wrong...did go wrong. LOL. The Immortal One does the Aphra kit reveal along with the start of the JML live stream. Finished the first round and half the second. Questions and comments read from discord and from the live chat. The Immortal One announced what his next big farm will be. You guys voted and I will follow through. Two streams left to go for the Immortal One to get his first GL.

On this week's Keepin' It Strong Style episode, Jeremy Donovan and the "Young Boy" Josh Smith are joined by JML to preview the NJPW/Stardom Historic X-Over pay-per-view. They also discuss World Tag League and Super Jr. Tag League predictions, NJPW STRONG, listener questions, and all the latest news in the world of New Japan Pro Wrestling.Get the official Keepin' It Strong Style t-shirt from Pro Wrestling Tees!Follow us on Twitter: @SocialSuplex, @KIStrongStyle, @JeremyLDonovanFollow us on Instagram: @SocialSuplexLike us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/SocialSuplex/Join our Discord: https://discord.gg/QUaJfaCVisit our website for news, columns, and podcasts: https://socialsuplex.com/Join the Social Suplex community Facebook Group: The Wrestling (Squared) CircleKeepin' It Strong Style is the New Japan Pro Wrestling Podcast of the Social Suplex Podcast Network. Support the Social Podcast Network by leaving a rating and review on Apple Podcasts.Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/social-suplex-podcast-network/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Welcome to 28th Glitch In The Matrix Stories Collection! Today we have some stories that will make you question reality itself, submitted and posted by everyday people. Today we have stories about reality shifts, breaks in our simulation, and other craziness. ➤ Want your story featured? Go to https://www.astheravendreams.com/Submit ➤ Want to know where to follow me on the internet? Go to https://www.astheravendreams.com/the-nevermore for all my links! ➤ You can also get EARLY ACCESS By joining my Patreon! https://patreon.com/astheravendreams Today's Video contains stories by the following Authors... Mia, nytngale, agallegos27, rosiemonkey, JML, AudreyCooper666, wassadoin, Ill-Candidate-838, PiYo10, Haileigh Jewell, Lisa G., Brooke, Venning Bellasis, M. Jeffs., IxAMxYOUxx, Lauraness, Ann Morgan, peterob123, and authors that requested anonymity. ➤ All stories within are used w/ Either direct permission from the author- or under some level of CC license (where noted) True Stories are not verified, and should all be considered 'supposedly true'. And Remember; You are loved, you are important, and you are valid. Never let anyone tell you otherwise.

Merryn talks to John Mills, founder of consumer goods distributor JML, chair of Vote Leave and one of the Labour Party's biggest donors. His latest book – "Why the West is Failing" – argues that a weak pound is needed to help revive UK manufacturing.

Amazing guest JML is back to talk about Stardom Kings of MidSummer. Lots of around the world chat before always a great time with J.

On Episode 392 of Spittin' Chiclets, the guys are joined by John-Michael Liles. JML (01:28:59) joined the boys to talk all things Avs, Kessel stories, and about his new Real Estate venture. The boys also break down their insane trip to Colorado-Edmonton. But first, the boys open with Whit's crazy travel story that went viral across Canada. The guys wrap up talking Rangers-Lightning, Bruins, LIV Golf and more.

For full show notes, go to GetCareerClarity.com/Episode154. Today's episode of the Career Clarity Show is specifically for recent grads and early career job seekers. We love this topic because launching your career post graduation is such a pivotal moment in life.  Our guest expert is Jillian Lucas, founder of JML Career Coaching. Jillian is a career coach and the founder of JML career coaching, and she firmly believes that everyone deserves a career they love.  Show Notes: Connect with Jillian Jillian on LinkedIn Instagram: @jillianlucas ONet  Handshake My Plan: What can I do with a major in…  HBR IdeaCast episode Roadmap to a Fulfilling Career eBook

Xaereth and Solobass15 (Solo to his friends) produce their ELEVENTY-THIRTY-FOURTH (lol) ever episode!! 3v3 is continuing to truck along! Is Juhani really this good??! Should we be angry about the schedule changes? What about the new event? There's a new crazy way to beat JML in 3v3 (for real, I can't believe it though). Too much to discuss. Podcast questions answered. So much madness. Madness!! Here are some links to help you on your way: Wheel Of Time Podcast - A Dagger for Sightblinder The Gambit Discord Server Xaereth's Twitch Channel Solobass15's Twitch Channel Gambit Twitch Channel Xaereth's YouTube Channel Solobass15's YouTube Channel Gambit YouTube Channel Grand Arena Counters - Google Sheets version Grand Arena Counters - Mobile-friendly version

L'Anthropocène implique de prendre en compte l'impact de l'être humain sur l'ensemble de la planète et pour les générations à venir. Quelles conséquences pour les enseignants quand on sait que former un citoyen responsable prend plus de temps que celui qui nous est imparti par le changement climatique ? L'EDD est-elle une réponse à la hauteur de l'enjeu ? Quelle approche pédagogique adopter avec ses élèves ? Ce « Parlons Pratiques ! » propose de mieux cerner ces notions et ces enjeux avec Jean-Marc Lange, spécialiste de la didactique de l'EDD, et Philippe Frasseto, enseignant en CE2. Vers l'écocitoyenneté : entre développement durable, écologie numérique et engagement, revivez les moments forts de cette journée organisée par Réseau Canopé le 23 novembre 2021. Références des invités : Soyez polis avec l'atmosphère, MOOC réalisé en classe par les élèves de CE2 de l'école François-Amadei de Bastia et initié par Philippe Frasseto en juin 2019. Barthes Angela, Lange Jean-Marc et Tutiaux-Guillon Nicole (dir.), Dictionnaire critique des enjeux et concepts des « éducation à », L'Harmattan, 2017. Inspirations des invités : Morin Edgar, Enseigner à vivre. Manifeste pour changer l'éducation, Actes Sud, 2014. Dion Cyril, Petit manuel de résistance contemporaine, Actes Sud, 2018. Viallet Jean-Robert, L'homme a mangé la terre, 98 min, 2019. En ligne gratuitement sur arte.tv jusqu'au 28/07/2022. Curnier Daniel, Vers une école éco-logique, Le Bord de l'eau, 2021. Gemenne François, Rankovic Aleksandar et al., Atlas de l'anthropocène, Presses de Sciences Po, 2021. Taddei François, Et si nous ? Comment relever ensemble les défis du XXIe siècle, Calmann-Levy, 2022. La transcription de cet épisode est disponible après les crédits. Chaque dernier mercredi du mois, découvrez un nouvel épisode de « Parlons pratiques ! » sur votre plateforme de podcasts préférée. Suivez-nous, écoutez et partagez… Retrouvez-nous sur : Extraclasse.reseau-canope.fr Apple Podcasts Spotify Deezer Google Podcasts Podcast Addict Extra classe, des podcasts produits par Réseau Canopé. Émission préparée et animée par : Hélène Audard et Régis Forgione Directrice de publication : Marie-Caroline Missir Coordination et production : Hervé Turri, Luc Taramini, Magali Devance Enregistrement et mixage : Simon Gattegno Secrétariat de rédaction : Blaise Royer Extraits : MOOC – Soyez polis avec l'atmosphère Contactez-nous sur : contact@reseau-canope.fr © Réseau Canopé, 2022 Transcription : HÉLÈNE AUDARD : Aujourd'hui, nous parlons d'Anthropocène, un mot que vous avez peut-être déjà entendu. C'est un concept scientifique récent qui entre progressivement dans le champ de l'éducation. Nous allons le définir plus précisément avec nos invités. Mais ce qu'on peut déjà dire, c'est qu'il implique de prendre en compte l'impact de l'être humain sur toute la biosphère et pour l'ensemble des générations à venir. RÉGIS FORGIONE : Quand on sait que former un citoyen responsable prend plus de temps que celui qui nous est imparti pour le changement climatique, on peut se dire que c'est un sacré défi pour tous les éducateurs. HA : L'éducation au développement durable [EDD] est-elle une réponse à la hauteur de l'enjeu ? Quelle approche pédagogique adopter avec ses élèves ? RF : Bien au-delà de l'éducation au climat ou des écogestes, nous allons demander à nos invités ce que cette notion d'Anthropocène peut changer dans les missions de l'école et dans les pratiques de classe. HA : Avec nous pour répondre à nos questions : Jean-Marc Lange, spécialiste de la didactique de l'EDD, et Philippe Frasseto, enseignant en CE2. RF : Jean-Marc Lange, bonjour JEAN-MARC LANGE : Bonjour. RF : Vous êtes professeur des universités, spécialiste de la didactique des éducations à la responsabilité sociétale en lien avec les sciences de la nature. Et vous êtes directeur adjoint du Lirdef, le Laboratoire interdisciplinaire de recherche en didactique, éducation et formation de l'université de Montpellier. C'est bien ça ? JML : Tout à fait. HA : Philippe Frasseto, bonjour. Vous êtes professeur des écoles à Bastia, en Corse, et vous avez notamment créé avec vos élèves de CE2 le MOOC – Soyez polis avec l'atmosphère. Et puis vous faites aussi beaucoup d'autres choses dont vous allez pouvoir nous parler. PHILIPPE FRASSETO : Oui, je confirme. RF : Alors pour commencer, je propose qu'on donne la parole aux enfants justement avec un premier extrait de ce MOOC. Un extrait qui provient de la vidéo intitulée « Le GIEC, c'est qui ? » [Extrait] « ÉLÈVE 1 : Le GIEC, c'est qui ? ÉLÈVE 2 : Pour mieux comprendre les mécanismes du climat et les effets du réchauffement, il existe un groupe de scientifiques international, qui travaillent ensemble. ÉLÈVE 1 : Ce groupe de scientifiques s'appelle le GIEC : le Groupe d'experts intergouvernemental sur l'évolution du climat. ÉLÈVE 2 : Le GIEC recueille et étudie l'ensemble des travaux de tous les chercheurs, de tous les pays, qui sont liés au climat : les glaces, le bois, le sol, les océans, l'atmosphère. ÉLÈVE 1 : Les scientifiques du GIEC comparent et vérifient ces différents modèles de climat de tous ces chercheurs, de tous ces pays, trouvent des résultats identiques ou pas. ÉLÈVE 2 : Si l'ensemble des chercheurs trouvent des résultats identiques, ça veut dire que ces résultats sont fiables, qu'on peut compter sur eux. ÉLÈVE 1 : Quand l'ensemble des chercheurs sont d'accord sur leurs résultats, ça s'appelle un consensus scientifique… ÉLÈVE 2 : Ça veut dire qu'il n'y a plus de doute sur les résultats. ÉLÈVE 1 : Pour que les femmes et les hommes politiques qui nous représentent prennent leurs décisions en comprenant bien la situation… ÉLÈVE 2 : Pour que tout le monde soit informé de ce qui peut arriver… » [Fin de l'extrait] RF : Il faut quand même que je décrive la scène aux auditeurs pour contextualiser un peu. Là, vous n'avez que l'audio, mais on a deux élèves de Philippe Frasseto, dans un décor digne de la forêt amazonienne que ne renieraient pas d'ailleurs un certain Jamy et [un certain] Fred. Même les vêtements des élèves sont d'inspiration naturelle, avec des imprimés fleuris. Tout est très joli, très gai, très soigné. On a donc un jeune garçon et une jeune fille qui, on l'entend, ont largement bûché sur ce sujet, sur le fond et sur la forme. Philippe, vous nous en direz plus sur ce fabuleux MOOC au cours de l'émission. Mais pour commencer, Jean-Marc Lange, puisque des enfants sont capables de comprendre et d'expliquer ce qu'est le GIEC, est-ce que vous pourriez expliquer à nos auditeurs et à nous cette fameuse notion d'Anthropocène ? JML : Je vais essayer de faire ça simplement, en quelques mots. C'est une idée qui nous vient d'un géochimiste néerlandais, qui s'appelle Paul Crutzen, qui a voulu définir une nouvelle période géologique dans laquelle on serait entré et qui succéderait à l'Holocène, avec l'idée que l'impact de l'humanité se révèle et peut être lu sur l'ensemble des compartiments de la planète. S'il a pu proposer cette idée-là, c'est parce que bien avant, il y a un chercheur, géochimiste lui aussi, qui s'appelait [Vladimir] Vernadsky – un chercheur russe au début du XXᵉ siècle –, qui a proposé l'idée de penser la planète en termes de différents compartiments : il y a l'hydrosphère, la géosphère, la biosphère, l'atmosphère. Et puis, surtout, la fin de son ouvrage s'appelle « Biosphère ». Il décrit l'importance de la noosphère, c'est-à-dire l'importance de l'activité humaine et de sa technique. Et l'idée que reprend Paul Crutzen, c'est que cette noosphère, dans cette activité technique humaine, impacte l'ensemble des autres compartiments et devient lisible et visible pour les géologues. HA : La question qu'on se pose aujourd'hui, c'est le lien entre l'Anthropocène – qui est cette notion scientifique – et l'éducation. Quand on a préparé cette émission, pour ne rien vous cacher, on a trouvé que ce n'était pas si simple de comprendre la nuance entre l'EDD, l'« éducation à… », « éduquer en Anthropocène ». Est-ce que vous pouvez nous aider à clarifier toutes ces notions ? JML : Il y a depuis longtemps l'éducation à l'environnement, qui a eu longtemps une approche naturaliste des choses. Ça consistait à connaître la faune, la flore, à apprendre à les respecter. Ça, c'est la question classique d'éducation à l'environnement. L'éducation au développement durable nous dit autre chose. Elle nous dit que c'est une question de développement, donc c'est une question qui ne peut pas être simplement pensée en terme environnemental, mais aussi en termes de développement économique, de développement social et, donc, en termes politiques. C'est ça que veut dire l'éducation « au » développement durable ou « en vue » d'un développement durable. Les « éducation à », c'est encore autre chose. C'est un terme institutionnel qui renvoie à différents types d'éducation, comme la santé, l'environnement, le développement durable, etc. Mais ce qu'il y a de commun, c'est que ce sont des éducations transversales, qui mettent au cœur la question de l'éducation et qui vont prendre comme objets les enjeux sociétaux d'aujourd'hui. On peut résumer ça comme ça, mais je ne sais pas si j'ai assez contrasté les différents domaines. RF : On a tout l'épisode pour complètement éclairer cette notion. Philippe Frasseto, de votre côté, quand ou comment avez-vous découvert cette notion ? Est-ce que ça a changé quelque chose dans votre manière d'aborder toutes ces questions en classe ? PF : Oui, parce que l'Anthropocène est un phénomène anthropologique. Et donc, quand on en saisit la mesure et les impacts, on ne peut plus ni enseigner, ni consommer, ni vivre de la même façon. On est dans l'Anthropocène, et donc enseigner en dehors de ce territoire serait être nulle part. Donc oui, ça change la façon d'enseigner. Mais après, quand on est avec des enfants, c'est une notion qui est complexe. Et à mon avis, il y a des prérequis. C'est-à-dire qu'il faut déjà comprendre ce que recouvre le mot évolution. Puisque l'Anthropocène c'est une nouvelle ère, elle se situe par rapport à une ère passée. Et donc il faut avoir accepté cette réalité : les choses changent et elles évoluent puisque l'Anthropocène se caractérise par un changement d'ère. Ça se traduit par une modification sensible de notre environnement. Une fois qu'on a intégré l'idée d'évolution – ce n'est pas si simple avec de jeunes enfants – il faut donner des repères sur les impacts, en expliquant comment les attitudes de chacun sont plus ou moins émettrices ou ont des impacts plus ou moins importants. Je crois qu'il ne s'agit pas d'être prescriptif ou culpabilisant, surtout avec des enfants, parce que les pauvres n'y sont pour rien – aujourd'hui en tout cas –, mais de leur faire prendre conscience que les choix individuels ont un effet sur l'environnement au sens large. Par exemple, pour faire un sweat-shirt en coton il faut 32 kilos de CO2 (équivalent). Peu de gens savent que quand ils prennent leur voiture, les traces qu'ils laissent dans l'atmosphère sont là pour cent ans. Il faut bien expliquer ça. Une grande télévision, c'est plus de 500 kilos de CO2 dans l'atmosphère, alors que de façon intéressante, monter aux arbres, faire du théâtre, jouer au foot, c'est zéro émission. À part le téléphone – évidemment ils sont accros, justement on a travaillé aussi là-dessus –, ils ont été amenés à voir que, en fait, ce qu'ils préfèrent faire ça n'émet pas de CO2. RF : Ces exemples que vous donnez, Philippe, sur le poids carbone d'un tee-shirt, sont notamment dans ce fameux MOOC. Comment en êtes-vous venu à ce projet-là ? On sait que l'Anthropocène ne fait pas partie des programmes. Sur quoi vous êtes-vous appuyé pour construire ce travail avec vos élèves ? PF : Comme je le disais tout à l'heure, la prise de conscience qu'on est entré dans cette espèce de nouvel âge de l'humanité : chacun de nous est devenu un sujet planétaire. Plus de sept milliards d'humains, ça peut sembler un peu diluer la responsabilité. Mais si chacun de nous est une partie du problème, chacun de nous est une partie de la solution ; on est de taille à relever ce défi, c'était déjà le postulat de départ. Moi, j'avais travaillé sur le système de MOOC, notamment avec le CRI [Centre de recherches interdisciplinaires, devenu le Learning Planet Institute en 2021] et les Savanturiers. Et ce format de MOOC me paraissait intéressant parce que, virtuellement, il permet le changement d'échelle. C'est-à-dire que le travail qu'on a fait est ouvert pour toute la francophonie. C'est gratuit et chacun peut s'y connecter. Donc ce système de MOOC m'intéressait. J'avais échangé avec Valérie Masson-Delmotte, via Twitter, sur comment on pourrait imaginer, adapter le contenu des rapports du GIEC pour les scolaires. C'était une question qui était restée plus ou moins en suspens, jusqu'à ce que je décide de me lancer. Donc, il a fallu vérifier qu'une plateforme en open source, ça marche ; que des partenaires me suivent. Et après ? Je suis passé, via Valérie Masson-Delmotte, par la directrice de la communication de l'Institut Pierre-Simon Laplace, qui a lancé un appel aux chercheurs. Des chercheurs mentors m'ont rejoint. Et la question que je leur ai posée, c'est « Qu'est-ce qu'un enfant de neuf ans peut et doit savoir pour comprendre les questions climatiques ? » À partir de là, on a construit une espèce de cursus, avec des controverses intéressantes entre les chercheurs, justement : celui qui était plutôt spécialiste des pollutions atmosphériques voulait mettre la pollution en tête, celle qui était plutôt spécialisée dans la question climatique disait : « Non, on parle de climat d'abord. Il faut comprendre l'effet de serre, on parle de pollution après. » Le parcours est particulier… Et après, ça a été le travail avec les élèves. HA : Jean-Marc Lange, on voit que c'est un travail de vulgarisation scientifique, qui a été fait dans le cadre de ce MOOC. On va en entendre plusieurs extraits par la suite. Ce travail de vulgarisation scientifique, est-ce qu'il est fait aussi au niveau des programmes d'enseignement ? Et est-ce que l'institution, de manière plus générale, prend en compte ces notions ? Comment est-ce qu'elle permet finalement de changer un peu d'échelle ? JML : Alors je dirais que ça dépend des niveaux scolaires aussi. Que ce soit au premier ou au second degré, les programmes actuels ont été très impactés par les travaux de Michel Lussault, géographe français, qui les a rédigés en partie [lorsqu'il a présidé le Conseil supérieur des programmes entre 2014 et 2107]. Il a rédigé tout ce qui concerne cette idée d'habiter le monde, qu'on retrouve dans les programmes du primaire et aussi dans le second degré. Et cet « habiter le monde », nous dit Michel Lussault, est inadéquat : c'est lui qui engendre la question d'un changement d'ère potentiel, qui reste discuté chez les géologues, mais qu'on ne peut pas ne pas prendre en compte en tant qu'humain justement. Et cet « habiter le monde » de Michel Lussault, il faut le compléter, si on veut le mettre en regard de l'Anthropocène, en reprenant une idée de Bruno Latour – un auteur que j'aime bien – qui dit : « Au-delà de l'“habiter le monde” qui n'est pas adéquat, c'est aussi le fait que le monde a changé. » Et c'est ça que recouvre l'idée d'Anthropocène. Donc on prend conscience que notre monde est en train de se transformer, de changer, et il faut apprendre à habiter non pas simplement le monde, mais un nouveau monde, d'une nouvelle manière. Et c'est par ce constat-là que le monde de l'éducation se trouve totalement interrogé, bousculé. HA : Alors justement, on va rentrer plus dans ce que ça peut changer du côté de l'enseignement, de ce qui se passe dans les classes. Et avant, un nouvel extrait des élèves de Philippe Frasseto, qui nous expliquent cette fois-ci ce qu'est l'empreinte carbone. [Extrait de la vidéo « L'empreinte carbone »] « ÉLÈVE 2 : Comprendre et agir : le poids carbone. ÉLÈVE 3 : En fait, chacun de nous, petits ou grands, riches ou pauvres, nous émettons, nous envoyons des gaz à effet de serre. Ils flottent dans l'atmosphère partout autour de la planète. ÉLÈVE 2 : Et ça chauffe. ÉLÈVE 3 : Ce qu'une personne émet dans l'atmosphère… ÉLÈVE 2 : … c'est son poids carbone. On dit aussi empreinte carbone. ÉLÈVE 3 : En fait, c'est la somme au kilo de ce qu'elle envoie dans l'atmosphère. Moi, j'ai dit “envoyer”, mais on dit “émettre”. ÉLÈVE 2 : Le poids carbone de chaque personne est différent. ÉLÈVE 3 : Eh oui, en fonction de nos façons de vivre, on laisse des traces plus ou moins importantes. ÉLÈVE 2 : OK, mais ça ne nous dit pas comment on fait pour diminuer ce poids carbone. ÉLÈVE 3 : T'inquiète, on y arrive. » [Fin de l'extrait] HA : On y arrive, nous dit cet élève. Il faut dire qu'on a affaire à des notions et des phénomènes complexes, qui ne s'expliquent pas juste en quelques secondes. Et on voit aussi que ces notions complexes, elles vont nous demander d'envisager d'autres approches pédagogiques. Jean-Marc Lange, éduquer au défi des limites planétaires, c'est complexe. C'est aussi un peu inquiétant. Est-ce que ce qui se fait actuellement dans les classes est à la hauteur des enjeux ? JML : Alors il doit y avoir certainement des cas particuliers qui sont à la hauteur des enjeux. Parce que, en fait, les enseignants ont une créativité qui est importante. Il faudrait aller regarder au cas par cas. Mais ce qu'on peut dire globalement, à priori, ça serait que non. Pour aborder la complexité de ces questions – parce qu'elles sont effectivement complexes au sens strict du terme, c'est-à-dire qu'il faut apprendre à tisser ensemble, à relier ensemble (c'est la pensée d'Edgar Morin) –, il faudrait avoir la capacité d'apprendre à relier tous ces éléments-là. Et le cloisonnement disciplinaire, en tout cas dans le second degré, s'oppose un peu à ces approches-là. Il y a d'autres modes à trouver, il y a effectivement des changements à apporter ; mais ce n'est pas simple. Mais peut-être qu'on en reparlera… Quand je dis que ce n'est pas simple, je n'oppose pas complexité à compliqué. On peut aborder la complexité de façon simple, mais en apprenant à relier les choses. Et c'est ça qui manque globalement – c'est ce que nous disent les enquêtes sur les jeunes – : c'est qu'ils ne savent pas relier ces choses entre elles, parce que c'est découpé dans des approches disciplinaires un peu trop cloisonnées. RF : Justement, Philippe, ça m'évoque plusieurs choses, ce que vient de dire Jean-Marc Lange. Il y a évidemment plus de cloisonnement dans le secondaire que dans l'élémentaire. On peut peut-être mieux décloisonner les choses. Et en préparant cette émission, vous nous aviez parlé aussi de ce fameux lien que les élèves ont fait eux-mêmes. Je crois que vous aviez utilisé le terme de basculement ontologique des élèves : pendant la conception du MOOC, ils ont fait ce lien entre météo et climat, entre la complexité de ce qui vous pouvait se mettre en place au quotidien et ce que ça pouvait changer dans le monde. Est-ce que vous pourriez nous dire quelques mots autour de tous ces points-là ? PF : En fait, le basculement du MOOC… Moi, je ne suis pas parti avec mes élèves en leur disant : « Vous allez voir, on va travailler sur l'environnement, on va sauver le monde. » Le chapô du projet, c'était « L'atmosphère ». On a commencé à travailler tout doucement, en étudiant le cycle de l'eau en profondeur, la photosynthèse – toutes ces notions d'ailleurs qui sont au programme. Et ensuite, on a commencé à avancer dans la climatologie, dans le chapitre deux : qu'est-ce que c'est que la météo ? Qu'est-ce que c'est que le climat ? Le temps court, le temps long ? Comment travaillent les climatologues ? Avec le bois ? Avec les glaces ? On a vu tout ça. Et ensuite, on a commencé à voir, toujours dans ce chapitre sur la climatologie, qu'en fait, depuis 150 ans, la moyenne mondiale des émissions avait augmenté. On a compris pourquoi. Et c'est là qu'ont commencé à apparaître les questions des élèves, qui n'étaient pas guidées vers un projet EDD, mais vers un projet scientifique. Parce que pendant toute la première partie, on a fait beaucoup d'expériences, de manipulations, etc. Et là [avec la vidéo « Les activités humaines et l'évolution du climat »], ils ont commencé à comprendre qu'en fait l'histoire n'était pas écrite et qu'il y avait plusieurs scénarios possibles. C'est vraiment une des vidéos que je préfère dans le MOOC, c'est cette idée de scénario. Un scénario, ça commence par : « Et si en fait ? ». Ça renvoie d'ailleurs au dernier bouquin de François Taddei : Et si nous ? [Paris, Calmann-Lévy, 2022]. Et donc à ce moment-là, ils ont compris que les choses étaient possibles, mais que ça dépendait de l'attitude qu'allaient avoir les adultes dans les années qui viennent. Et ils en sont venus à dire : « Mais en fait, on nous dit “sois sage”. » Et je leur dis : « Effectivement, on vous dit “sois sage”. Qu'est-ce que c'est qu'être sage ? Être sage, évidemment, c'est regarder les différents scénarios et faire en conscience. » Et c'est ce moment de bascule où ils ont été saisis, j'allais dire pour forcer un peu le trait, par le vide abyssal, une espèce de trou qu'il y a, et qu'on ne voit pas – on ne travaille pas sur cette question suffisamment. En même temps, [ils ont compris que] l'histoire n'était pas écrite, mais que tout était devant et que… voilà : c'est un moment de bascule. Parce que du coup, ça [en] fait plus des gens qui s'engagent que des gens qui critiquent. HA : Donc, vous êtes partis des savoirs et ce sont les savoirs qui ont amené à une prise de conscience chez vos élèves. Jean-Marc Lange, qu'est-ce que vous avez vu, pour amener les élèves à cette prise de conscience, à ce raisonnement systémique, comme approches pédagogiques qui fonctionnent bien ? Quelles sont celles qui fonctionnent peut-être moins bien ? Mais, peut-être allons vers celles qui seraient intéressantes à développer ? JML : Moi, je ne commencerais pas par les savoirs. Mais après tout, le mode d'entrée peut être pluriel. Mais ce qui fonctionne bien en fait, c'est d'entrer dans ces problématiques-là par une question locale, un enjeu local qui se pose réellement et qui est appréhendable, à la portée à la fois physique et puis intellectuelle des élèves. Cet enjeu local, on va essayer de le comprendre par une démarche d'enquête, l'enquête étant la grande démarche pédagogique des « éducations à », globalement. Les savoirs sont indispensables, bien sûr, pour structurer la pensée. Les élèves réclament qu'on les aide à structurer leur pensée. Mais on va plutôt les convoquer au fur et à mesure pour éclairer les disciplines. À ce moment-là, on les pense en termes de contribution, et non plus en mode d'entrée dans une problématique. HA : Et ça, dans le second degré, ce n'est pas le plus simple à faire, parce que l'organisation institutionnelle ne le permet pas nécessairement. JML : Alors ça, c'est ce que je dis, c'est assez facile à faire au primaire, dans le sens où les conditions le permettent. Et puis ça peut être fait aussi à l'université, lorsqu'on a des plages suffisantes. Mais dans le second degré, ça se heurte à une organisation disciplinaire qui est trop rigide – pas forcément parce que l'institution le demande, mais ce sont des coutumes installées sur lesquelles personne n'ose revenir franchement. La pédagogie de projet a toujours existé, que ce soit au collège ou au lycée. Mais ça a du mal à prendre sa place, parce qu'il y a la compétition entre les disciplines, les équilibres entre les cycles, etc. Donc ce sont plus des habitudes ancrées que des difficultés matérielles ou institutionnelles qui s'y opposeraient en fait. RF : Alors vous parliez de projet local, Jean-Marc Lange, et je sais que ça fait écho justement à un autre projet de Philippe Frasseto, qui fait du lien avec tout ça. Je vous propose juste qu'on écoute un troisième extrait du MOOC, et on en arrive à ce côté local. Dans ce troisième extrait, on retrouve nos formateurs en herbe, en l'occurrence formatrices, parce que là, ce sont deux jeunes filles. Et c'est un extrait, cette fois, issu d'une vidéo qui traite des activités humaines et de l'évolution du climat. [Extrait de la vidéo « Les activités humaines et l'évolution du climat »] « ÉLÈVE 4 : Qu'est-ce qui s'est passé depuis 150 ans ? ÉLÈVE 5 : Quand on brûle du charbon, du pétrole et du gaz pour faire tourner des machines, pour chauffer ou pour se déplacer, on rajoute encore et encore des gaz à effet de serre dans l'atmosphère. ÉLÈVE 4 : Mais dans le futur, alors est-ce que la température va continuer à augmenter ? ÉLÈVE 5 : On ne peut pas le savoir. ÉLÈVE 4 : Même les scientifiques, les spécialistes, ils ne savent pas ? ÉLÈVE 5 : Non, parce qu'il y a une chose qu'on ne sait pas encore. ÉLÈVE 4 : Laquelle ? ÉLÈVE 5 : On ne peut pas savoir comment les humains vont se comporter dans le futur. Ça, personne ne peut le savoir. » [Fin de l'extrait] RF : Alors voilà bien un paradoxe intéressant évoqué par ces jeunes et ces futures citoyennes : des adultes en responsabilité mais, on l'a dit, pas toujours sages, pas toujours à la hauteur des aspirations de cette jeunesse, de ces enfants parfois même très jeunes. Et en même temps, ces élèves de CE2 ont bien conscience que l'avenir passe par eux, on l'a dit tout à l'heure. Philippe Frasseto, pour concilier justement ces grands enjeux, côté Anthropocène, qui dépassent les enfants de cet âge – mais même nous, j'ai envie de dire – quelles actions concrètes, transformatrices, à hauteur d'enfant et du quotidien ? Je crois que vous allez sortir de votre chapeau un autre projet qui articule le local et le côté Anthropocène. PF : Je suis entièrement d'accord avec la remarque qui a été faite tout à l'heure sur l'entrée par les savoirs qui n'est pas forcément la bonne. Ma perspective était double : il fallait que je forme les élèves de ma classe pour qu'ils forment d'autres élèves, via un MOOC, et pour traiter de questions qui ne sont pas des questions locales, qui sont des questions globales puisque l'atmosphère ne connaît pas de frontières – excusez la rime. Et donc on a travaillé là-dessus. Ceci dit, c'est un projet hors sol, via des écrans. Et ça m'a amené pour cette année à faire radicalement l'inverse, parce que je ne travaille pas sur l'atmosphère mais sur le sol et que je ne travaille plus avec des ordinateurs, mais dans la petite forêt qui est à côté de l'école. Là, on est sur des expériences concrètes et on convoque les savoirs, mais avec les mains dans la terre, en plantant ou en apprenant à bouturer, à semer, en aménageant un espace. Mais je suis revenu – j'ai « atterri » au sens latourien du terme – sur la question de l'engagement des enseignants. Très peu d'enseignants sont engagés, il faut bien le dire. Peut-être que dans le vivier – ou le terreau, pour filer la métaphore –, des enseignants, qui travaillent sur ces questions, ont pris conscience de cette nouvelle donne anthropologique. Peut-être qu'on a là le terreau de nouvelles pratiques pédagogiques, presque révolutionnaires, parce qu'il s'agit de changer les priorités, en fait. Quelles sont les priorités ? L'accord du participe passé ou bien faire la différence entre un chêne et un olivier ? Je crois que c'est une question de priorités qui doivent changer. C'est un projet pour les élèves et pour les gens du quartier. Ce n'est pas quelque chose qui va passer par les réseaux. Au contraire, moins il y a de journalistes, mieux c'est. Il faut que ce soit approprié par des gens sur un sol. Et c'est probablement par-là que les choses vont passer. HA : Oui, parce qu'il y a un aspect aussi social dans ce projet. Vous n'êtes pas que sur l'environnement, dans une acception un peu stricte. PF : Oui, il y a un côté social. Moi, je suis dans un quartier pas très mixte, puisque sur mes 24 élèves, j'en ai 22 qui sont d'origine étrangère, qui viennent principalement du Maghreb. Donc [on peut imaginer] les bâtiments, le quartier, tout ça… Et à côté de cette petite école, il y a un espace vert qui est juste incroyable, que je ne connaissais pas. On m'avait dit que c'était dégueulasse, que c'était dangereux, qu'il y avait des déchets partout. Ça, c'était vrai. Mais en fait, on s'est appropriés cet endroit tout doucement avec les élèves, en signant une convention – parce que c'est [la] propriété de l'hôpital de Bastia. On a réussi à utiliser cette aire pour travailler. Et l'idée, c'est d'expliquer à ces enfants, qui viennent d'ailleurs, que [c'est ça] l'unité du quartier, [que] c'est là qu'ils sont chez eux. Plus que n'importe où au Maroc, certainement. Et aussi, plus chez eux que d'autres Corses « de souche » – si tant est que cela ait un sens – qui arriveraient d'une autre région de Corse dans le quartier. Et le fait de travailler sur cette question de l'identité du quartier met en relation avec la terre et le vivant. Donc ça, c'est plutôt le projet de cette année. C'est un peu un contrepoint de ce que j'ai fait l'an passé. RF : Jean-Marc Lange, on sent que finalement, cette notion d'Anthropocène, c'est un sujet politique, c'est éthique, c'est loin d'être seulement scientifique. Et on sait à quel point la posture des enseignants peut être compliquée dès qu'il y a ces mots « politique » ou « éthique ». Quelle posture de neutralité devrait être adoptée ? Est-ce que c'est une notion mal comprise ? Est-ce que ce devoir de neutralité entre en jeu ici ? Ou on est complètement dans autre chose ? JML : Les enseignants ont tendance à confondre deux choses en fait : ce qui est le politique et la politique. Et le politique, c'est comprendre la dimension de l'implication dans la cité. Polis, ça veut dire gérer la cité. C'est l'origine du mot. Entre le politique et [le fait d']être dans une démarche partisane, la neutralité a du mal à être comprise, à trouver sa place. Il y a cette tradition très fortement ancrée, et avec raison, de la neutralité républicaine chez les enseignants. Effectivement, ils ne doivent pas être partisans, mais une fausse neutralité qui serait d'ignorer les enjeux sociétaux de l'époque dans laquelle on est, c'est finalement être partisan à sa manière en fait. La neutralité, telle qu'elle est trop souvent admise, est une prise de position politico-technicienne. Il faut donc assumer la dimension politique au sens noble du terme, avec un grand « P », pour reconnaître que, derrière ce qui se passe, ce sont des choix de société, ce sont des choix de développement qui concernent tous les citoyens. C'est une barrière qui est très compliquée à faire comprendre. Il faut être impartial, ce qui n'est pas la même chose que d'être neutre, en tant qu'enseignant. On n'est effectivement pas là pour choisir un modèle de société ou une orientation politique. Mais on doit faire comprendre que ces enjeux, que ce soient le climat ou d'autres questions liées à l'Anthropocène, ce sont bien des enjeux politiques au sens ancien du terme. HA : Philippe Frasseto, vous déploriez un petit peu que les enseignants ne soient peut-être pas suffisamment engagés. Vous, finalement, c'est un engagement personnel que vous avez eu d'abord, et puis que vous avez traduit dans votre pratique professionnelle. Mais en même temps, vous n'étiez pas forcément à l'aise non plus avec l'idée de paraître militant dans votre posture d'enseignant. PF : Est-ce qu'il est possible d'être neutre ? Je ne crois pas moi. Je suis engagé dans l'enseignement des questions climatiques, ce qui n'est pas neutre. Par exemple, dans le quatrième chapitre, on donne des repères [au niveau] macro sur les bilans carbone : sur la moyenne des émissions mondiales, les émissions des pays riches, les émissions des pays pauvres. Et si on regarde de plus près, la moyenne française est environ de 10 tonnes d'émission de CO2 équivalent par personne et par an. Et si on regarde un peu plus près, on voit que les 10 % les plus pauvres en France émettent 800 kilos par an, et les 1 % les plus riches émettent 56 tonnes. Donc, c'est un écart qui est de 1 à 70. C'est un fait, qui pose la question de la justice climatique. Donc ce n'est pas neutre d'en parler, mais ce n'est pas neutre de la passer sous silence. Certains enseignants n'abordent pas les questions climatiques : est-ce que pour autant ils sont neutres ? Je rejoins vraiment ce que vous disiez tout à l'heure. Est-ce que ramener la question climatique au débat sur le nucléaire, c'est neutre ? Non. Donc, une fois qu'on a admis l'impossibilité d'une neutralité absolue, il appartient à chacun de placer le curseur. Est-ce que j'essaye d'être le plus neutre possible ? Ou est-ce que j'assume de ne pas être neutre du tout ? Dans l'exercice de mon métier, dans ce continuum relatif et pas absolu, je crois qu'il faut essayer d'être le plus neutre possible – parce qu'il n'est pas souhaitable que tous les gens qui ont des opinions se mettent à les distiller à leurs élèves en classe. On voit bien que ça ne pourrait pas marcher. Donc une neutralité relative… Mais ça n'exclut pas de s'appuyer sur des faits scientifiques et de hiérarchiser les priorités. HA : Des enseignants engagés pour des élèves qui s'engagent, on peut peut-être dire quelque chose comme ça. On arrive au temps d'inspiration. On vous a demandé, à chacun, de réfléchir à une inspiration que vous aimeriez partager avec nos auditeurs et nos auditrices. Je commence avec vous, Jean-Marc Lange. JML : Je pensais à un petit ouvrage qui a été écrit par un collègue suisse, Daniel Curnier, et qui s'appelle Vers une école éco-logique [Lormont, Éd. du Bord de l'eau, 2021], dans lequel il explique, à partir d'un travail de thèse de recherche qu'il a mené, que l'école doit entrer dans une nouvelle logique. C'est un peu cette idée-là, et ça serait un premier repère. Et pour ceux qui ont envie de s'intéresser à la question de l'Anthropocène, il y a un documentaire qu'on trouve facilement sur YouTube, qui a été diffusé par Arte, qui s'appelle L'Homme a mangé la Terre [Jean-Robert Viallet, 98 min, 2019]. C'est le premier documentaire qui a un point de vue sur l'Anthropocène. Ça peut être un point de départ pour discuter, pour explorer. Mais ce documentaire n'est pas à prendre au premier degré parce qu'il est très partisan. En tout cas, c'est une base qui illustre bien la complexité, le fait que tous ces éléments sont reliés entre eux. Et on entre en plein dans la question du développement et de sa durabilité. Voilà deux références que j'aurais envie de donner. HA : Merci. On les retrouvera dans le descriptif du podcast. Philippe ? PF : Alors moi, je recommanderais L'Atlas de l'Anthropocène [de François Gemenne] aux Presses de Sciences Po [2019] qui est vraiment magnifique. L'iconographie [est riche, c'est] très documenté, avec une postface de Bruno Latour. C'est vraiment super intéressant. Edgar Morin, Enseigner à vivre [Arles, Actes Sud, 2020] aussi. Le Petit Manuel de résistance contemporaine de Cyril Dion [Arles, Actes Sud, 2021], ça peut être utile. Les bouquins de François Taddei ; tous, et le dernier en particulier. Et après, je terminerais justement par François Taddei, quelqu'un qui m'a beaucoup inspiré. Quand il est venu en Corse, le Dasen – le directeur académique – lui a demandé : « Quels sont, d'après vous, les trois compétences les plus importantes à transmettre à nos élèves ? » Il a répondu : « Être empathique, collaborer et relever les défis. » Et donc, ça fait un moment que je tourne autour de ces trois notions en me disant : « Est-il possible d'aller plus loin ? Est ce qu'on peut démonter ce triptyque ? » Et aujourd'hui, j'ai envie d'ajouter : « Être empathique avec le vivant, collaborer avec le vivant et relever les défis de l'Anthropocène. » Si on va comme ça, peut-être que ça pourra aller. Et le dernier truc, peut-être, sur les questions d'éducation : on voit avec effarement que peut-être maintenant il faut commencer à travailler l'adaptation, et plus seulement l'atténuation. Il faudrait qu'on réfléchisse là-dessus. RF : On va tous réfléchir là-dessus. On encourage nos auditeurs à réfléchir là-dessus. Pour conclure cette émission, on vous encourage, au-delà de toutes ces ressources que vous allez retrouver dans les notes qui accompagnent cet épisode, [à consulter] les travaux de Jean-Marc Lange et le fameux MOOC – Soyez polis avec l'atmosphère de Philippe Frasseto, ça vaut vraiment le coup. Allez y jeter un œil, inscrivez-vous. C'est vraiment extraordinaire. Pour conclure, j'ai envie de dire qu'on a appelé cette émission « Ce que l'Anthropocène fait à l'École » et qu'on aimerait bien en faire une autre dans quelques années, qui serait plutôt « Ce que l'École a pu faire à l'Anthropocène » pour inverser la tendance, soyons fous. Un grand merci à tous les deux d'avoir participé à cet épisode. Merci beaucoup. JML et PF : Merci à vous.

We all go through life changes. How we feel about it on the inside is important, but how the world perceives our changes is important too. History and rhetoric show us that we as humans have built in mechanisms for understanding the changes we see in others. Whether or not your change fits those models will determine how well your community accepts or rejects your evolutions or your returns. For those seeking to effect political and cultural changes, these models can also shape to what extent political changes are understood, perceived, and/or adopted by the public. Dr. Adam Ellwanger is a professor who teaches rhetoric, philosophy, and history and he is the author of the book "METANOIA: Rhetoric, Authenticity, and the Transformation of Self." He joins me to discuss his book, current political rhetoric, the New Right, Frogs, and my own personal experiences with change.  Interesting, powerful, revealing, and educational - this is a another JML classic. -- Liminal-order.com twitter.com/jackmurphylive youtube.com/jackmurphylive Dr. Ellwanger's Book: Metanoia

The Mob, The Long Night, and the Path of Maximum Courage Jordan Hall: futurist, technologist, philosopher, sense maker. He returns to JML to discuss and wide range of topics including how the world has changed after the Russia invasion, open source network swarm, egregores, humility, sense making, personal sovereignty, propaganda, the end of history, spiritual journeys, web3, lorecraft, emergent phenomenon and more. Talks with Jordan are always worth the time.   - Russia / Ukraine - Fukiyama - What is War energy? - The death energy - Blood lust - Open source network swarm (re: John Robb) - Changing the niche of our own social environment - Collective intelligence - Emergent phenomenon - Oral tradition - printing press - internet - Coordination Capacity - Egregore - How do humans coordinate - Moloch - Ensoulment - Something so scary it feels like a lie - Victorian synthesis - Blue Church / Red Religion - Crossing the adaptive valley - There's no here to stay in - Adapt or die - Weimar Germany - Russia in the adaptive valley, blood lust, and collective intelligence. - Risk aversion - Courage - How to use digital to nudge behavior - Chinese Social Credit System - How to make small changes in the choice landscape - How to nudge the mob - Identity and control structures - Surrender - Soul, body, persona - Path of maximum courage - Niche adaption - The Mob, The Long Night, and the Path of Maximum Courage - Power vs Strength - Personal Sovereignty - How to listen to your gut, and why - The clean feedback of getting punched in the face - Self, Family, Community - How community can solve the world - DAO - web3 - lorecraft - ego death - transcendent design

This episode features the Indiana native John-Michael Liles. JML covers his career as a defenseman in the NHL for the Colorado Avalanche, Toronto Maple Leafs, Carolina Hurricanes and Boston Bruins.  He shares important life lessons from the AHL and even stories from the wine cellar.  We also talk about making tough guys cry with our most recent recipient, Joe Bradley who was recently declared cancer free from prostate cancer.    

Money Talks – a series of interviews with Liam Halligan, Economics and Business Editor of GB News. In this episode, Liam talks to John Mills, Founder and CEO of JML Ltd. JML employs hundreds of people, turns over tens of millions of pounds each year and sells mainly household goods, often via shopping channels, all over the world. Mills is one of the UK's most experienced and respected import-exporters. He's also a trained economist and his many essays and books on economic policy are highly influential across Westminster, Whitehall and beyond. On top of that, perhaps unusually for a business titan, John Mills is the Labour party's biggest private donor - only the trade unions fund the party to a greater extent. Having run a global business for many years, Mills supported Brexit and was Chairman of Vote Leave – the officially-designated group which campaigned for the UK to leave the European Union. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

This one requires very little preamble. Sacha Dunable of Dunable Guitars and Intronaut sat down with Jay and Thomas from JML guitars to talk about building guitars, and their collaboration building 8 one-of-a-kind guitars featuring Dunable's shapes, electronics, and finishes on top of JML's hand carved neck-through construction.Jeff got his grubby hands on of the guitars, but a couple are still out in the wild...check the links below. Also listened to a couple songs and went on random tangents, as per ususal.Dunable Guitarshttps://dunableguitars.com/Intronauthttps://www.metalblade.com/intronaut/JML Guitarshttps://www.jmlguitars.com/Available collaboration guitarsCoast Sonic: https://coastsonic.com/collections/dunable-guitars/products/dunable-x-jml-r2-natural-1https://coastsonic.com/collections/dunable-guitars/products/dunable-x-jml-cyclops-aquahttps://coastsonic.com/collections/dunable-guitars/products/dunable-guitars-x-jml-guitars-yeti-black-burstNortherner Guitars:https://northernerguitars.com/shop/ols/products/new-dunable-yeti-jml-collaboration-2021This week's SubmissionsSons of Morpheus Split, featuringOnyric Joy - https://onyricjoy.bandcamp.com/album/sons-of-morpheus-split-with-dos-brujos&Dos Brujos - https://dosbrujos.bandcamp.com/album/sons-of-morpheus-split-with-onyric-joyBandcamp PickClosure in Moscow - https://closureinmoscow.bandcamp.com/album/pink-lemonadeBands! Submit one song (preferably from Bandcamp) to blyndsub@gmail.com and we'll try to cover it on another episode. Find us on social media @blyndsubmyshynz.YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCi_8QVmx1ggBQHGKln88UNwTheme song by Francis Anger RobertsVO by Pete HollandLogo by Nick Fox

We are joined the The JML to talk about Stardom GP final, we also get a bit into Rev Pro and why britwres is still dead.

Get Instant Access to Francois's Handout https://www.ProctorOffer.com/agreement How to build and rebuild your business twice in one decade | Featuring Francois Mackay Father of 4 amazing children, François is passionate about real estate. After working briefly for the National Bank, he became a real estate agent at age 21. Now almost 24 years later he operate his own real estate agency with over 65 agents on the road and 12 people working in his administration. Is team was the first one to go above 400 sales in a year in 2013. In 2018, he appeared on TV for an Interior Designer show and this year 2021, was feature in TV show called Accepted Offer. He is highly involved in charity work. He has been honorary president of the Shelter for abused women, Muscular Dystrophy, CLSC, Popular soup for poor people, Kids in needs, kids sports team and has been and still is his VP of the Lachine Hospital Foundation for the past 9 years. His team, Groupe Mackay has been specializing in new construction and is now representing major builder such as JML, Vivenda, Prevel Alliance, Kastello and VillaNova, the biggest project in Quebec. He recently open a 2nd office and 2 more offices shall open within the next 24 months. Groupe Mackay also releases its Commercial division in 2020 to help business people make the appropriate decisions during the Covid-19 period. His goal is To be the first agent To hit 2000 sales within a team concept… And that is on the map for 2022!

It's "meet Jeff's favorite luthier" week as we welcome James and Thomas from JML Guitars. Lots of discussion about woodworking and guitar building, JML's collaboration with Dunable Guitars, and of course music (James and Thomas play in bands together, and have pretty eclectic taste come to find out). We wrap up by going down the fascinating rabbit hole that is the incredible bands and album art of Eastbreath Records! The audio quality for JML is a little rough, but improves about 30 minutes in!JML GuitarsWeb: https://www.jmlguitars.com/Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/JMLGuitars IG: https://www.instagram.com/jmlinstruments This Week's SubmissionsBlack Pantieshttps://blackpantiesband.bandcamp.com/album/let-down-knockoutWhen the Deadbolt Breakshttps://whenthedeadboltbreaks.bandcamp.com/album/angels-are-weeping-god-has-abandonedRed Onhttps://redonmusic.bandcamp.com/album/watersDagtumhttps://eastbreathrecords.bandcamp.com/album/revered-decadenceEastbreath Recordshttps://eastbreathrecords.bandcamp.com/musicBandcamp PickFroglordhttps://froglord.bandcamp.com/album/the-mystic-toadBands! Submit one song (preferably from Bandcamp) to blyndsub@gmail.com and we'll try to cover it on another episode. Find us on social media @blyndsubmyshynz. If you like the podcast, subscribe, share it with your friend, or head over to our to watch the video version!https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCi_8QVmx1ggBQHGKln88UNwTheme song by Francis Anger RobertsLogo by Nick Fox

CERTIFIED. Every Monday Night.On the 50th episode special of The Certified Platinum Show, the crew reminisces on the progress of the show, how the show originated, battles when beginning, and some tips for upcoming creators including content quality control and consistency… (04:25)Things get a bit serious when Kristo divulges some tragic family news that may explain some of the behind-the-scenes happenings at The Certified Platinum Network. Prayers go out to the deceased and all those that have passed so far in 2021...(15:45)50 episodes strong and we continue to thank you each and every episode for your continued support. Whether you're a first time listener OR even a last time listener, we appreciate you taking the time to join us on this audio experience. You could've been anywhere in the world, listening to anything in the world...yet you decided to be here with us, and we appreciate that. 50 down, many more to go!New Music: (34:58)Certified Tracks (51:20): (KDOT) Lullaby - Belly; (DANA) Do Bout It - Rooga; (MCDOWELL) Tears of Joy - Rick Ross ft. Cee-LoListen to all the songs from our Certified Tracks on Apple Music & Spotify!:certifiedplatinum.ca/listenFollow us on Instagram: @CertifiedPlatinumShow. Follow Us on Twitter: @CertifiedPod.Special Thanks To: Bijan C, Quentin O, Enykuwa M, JML, Kenneth S & Kudos NReleased: April 19th, 2021certifiedplatinum.ca/disclaimer

00:00 Kevin Trudea's book, The Natural Cures They Don't Want You To Know About! https://respectfulinsolence.com/2014/10/28/ebola-right-to-try-laws-and-placebo-legislation/ 03:00 Controversial TV Pitchman Kevin Trudeau Jailed, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ghlNVeQuWgA 20:00 The case against challenge trials, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=138131 24:00 Friday Sessions on JML with Curtis Yarvin and Michael Anton, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LrC0jWF42CI 25:00 Michael Anton Says He Does Not Know Who Truly Won The 2020 Election, But He's ‘Moved On', https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=137453 1:44:00 WSJ: ‘How a Census Bureau error led Democrats to assume they were on the right side of inexorable demographic trends', https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=136917 1:59:00 Racism, sexism and misogyny broadcast on the airwaves, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g147JobmqxE 2:12:00 Rogue Superpower: Why This Could Be an Illiberal American Century, https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2020-10-06/illiberal-american-century-rogue-superpower 2:28:40 Myth of Entangling Alliances — Michael Beckley on International Security Author Chats, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q0AJdO-c-RE 2:33:00 Daryl Davis: American Hero, https://fakenous.net/?p=2214 2:47:30 The case for and against anonymity Join this channel to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCSFVD7Xfhn7sJY8LAIQmH8Q/join https://odysee.com/@LukeFordLive, https://lbry.tv/@LukeFord, https://rumble.com/lukeford https://dlive.tv/lukefordlivestreams Listener Call In #: 1-310-997-4596 Superchat: https://entropystream.live/app/lukefordlive Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/lukeford/ Soundcloud MP3s: https://soundcloud.com/luke-ford-666431593 Code of Conduct: https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=125692 https://www.patreon.com/lukeford http://lukeford.net Email me: lukeisback@gmail.com or DM me on Twitter.com/lukeford Support the show | https://www.streamlabs.com/lukeford, https://patreon.com/lukeford, https://PayPal.Me/lukeisback Facebook: http://facebook.com/lukecford Feel free to clip my videos. It's nice when you link back to the original.

Beginning with Heidegger is an in-depth examination of the influence that Martin Heidegger's inceptual thought exerted on Leo Strauss, Richard Rorty, Jacques Derrida and Alexander Dugin. How did these vastly different thinkers employ Heideggerian concepts to define their own philosophies and often antagonistic politics? Join me and author Michael Millerman as we discuss his new book and a whole lot more. Michael Millerman with Jack Murphy in JML #046. Learn more about Michael's work at https://www.michaelmillerman.ca, and find his class on Leo Strauss at https://otherlife.co/strauss. Follow Jack Liminal Order: liminal-order.com Twitter: twitter.com/jackmurphylive Facebook: facebook.com/jackmurphylive Instagram: instagram.com/jackmurphylive

Filmmaker, journalist, activist, father, almost politician - Christopher Rufo is on the front lines of media, politics, and culture. We talk current events, Rufo's latest documentary, and 2021 - join us! Christopher Rufo with Jack Murphy in JML #045. Follow Chris at @realchrisrufo on Twitter.   Follow Jack Liminal Order: liminal-order.com Twitter: twitter.com/jackmurphylive Facebook: facebook.com/jackmurphylive Instagram: instagram.com/jackmurphylive

EP46: HOW TO JUMP START YOUR JOB SEARCH IN 2021: 6 Tips to Get You Seen & Hired Welcome back Chit Chatter!  In today's episode I am going deep in the steps of how to maximize your time while job searching. We all know that job searching can be very daunting, stressful and even boring.  My tips in this episode are here to make your life and your time efficient and easy. If you're on the hunt for a new position in 2021 make sure that you know what type of work you're seeking. This will help you understand what keywords to use when searching in the job boards such as LinkedIn and Indeed.  Here are my top 6 tips! Update Your Resume You want to make sure that your resume is screaming HIRE ME! This means going through your experience and professional development line by line. Tailor and Customize Your Resume to Match the Job The most important and critical document in your job search process is your resume. Yes, you need to change your resume EVERY TIME YOU APPLY. Trick #1: Create a master version of your resume that has all of your work experience of the past 7-10 years. Be sure to be detailed in every position you help and professional positions. This will help shorten your time in creating the custom resume for the new job you're applying to.  Go through the job description of the job you want to apply for. Highlight  every responsibility and qualification that you know you can do. Write an example of how you can perform these tasks and duties in the margin or in your word doc.  Use the keywords for the job description to add into your resume. These are searchable. Keywords are action words or phrases describing and action or event that are included in the description to help hiring managers and recruiters filter through applicants much quicker. You want these in your resume and cover letter.  Keep this in a safe space, I have every single version of a resume I've ever written since they invented flash drives! HA! You never know when it's time to pull up an old relic. Update Your LinkedIn Profile Your LinkedIn profile is your resume on steroids. It's your resume that never sleeps and it is the place where you can get seen by recruiters and potential employers.  Use keywords from your resume and the job descriptions you found to sprinkle throughout your profile.  Update your headline to “actively seeking employment in BLANK industry.” Look for similar headlines amongst other LinkedIn users The idea is that your profile needs to scream HIRE ME! HIRE ME! Start Engaging in Networking LinkedIn is the largest social media networking platform. With over 500 Million active users, LinkedIn is the place to stand out and get seen! Start to search for recruiters or people in the industry or field your interested in getting hired. This is how you can start to find people and then send them a customized invitation to join their network.  The connections you're establishing are going to help you develop relationships and learn from those individuals who are hiring or can connect you to folks who are.  Customizing your invitation is critical to getting accepted on someone's network. You will want to make sure you tailor a message to the person you want to connect with BEFORE YOU SEND THE INVITATION! Join Groups, Create Posts & Share Info Similar to other social media platforms, you want to get noticed. LinkedIn has an algorithm that allows its users to be visible. Create a post that catches your network's attention Share articles and resources that people share and comment on Comment on other people's posts so you can create engagement and draw attention to your profile The Cover Letter As annoying as they may be to write, a cover letter is an essential tool in the job search process. Writing one can be tedious, but if you follow the 4 steps I outlined in the podcast you should be a wiz at writing them in no time.  If you or someone you know needs assistance with their resume, their cover letter or LinkedIn profile, send them my way! My Job Search Pivot (JSP) program is a slam dunk to get you hired! Head over to my website, www.coachingwithjosemiguel.com for details on purchasing this package.  IF you found value in this episode, do me a favor, leave a review on Apple Podcast and now on Podchaser.com. It would mean the world to me! Until Next Time!   XO, JML   #bestisyettocome #millennials #NewYearNewYou #LifeCoach #CareerCoach #Goals  #podcast #podcasting #LinkedIn #Jobsearch #Resume #CoverLetter

For episode 13 we sat down and chatted with Christian Lembach, the charming singer and guitar player for pummeling noise rock outfit Whores. Turns out Christian is a chill homebody who has a side-hustle in Atlanta's film and television industry, and a cat named Taco. Taco Cat. We end up talking a lot about how important relationships are to DIY artists, and how strange a media empire eOne is, and what it was like to grow up on tiny Marco island in Florida. We dig back into the Bay Area's history of Noise Rock, including classic bands like Grotus. We discuss a recurring theme...that music is literal magic. He drops a little news bomb...that they've joined Nathan Carson's Nanotear booking agency...when shows happen again that is.At the merch table. Christian shows off his new Hanoi Rocks recorded, and Jeff flashes a couple of new Boss Keloid records, and his new bass built by JML custom guitars. It's a stunner.Christian informs who our new favorite old band is...the almighty Asschapel! And then we wrap up with a really touching discussion of Christian's favorite hometown band Smoke. Smoke was a legendary unique dark folk/funeral dirge indie rock band from Atlanta. Two members, who Christian was good friends with, have passed, and he talks about how the hopelessness they expressed touched him because they were a part of his wild youth and ultimately his sobriety. He talks about how he was lucky to get away from drugs, and how his gratitude for getting sober fuels his musical drive. Take a listen, and watch the documentary about Benjamin Smoke's life linked below.Whores: https://whores.bandcamp.com/Cornucopia from the MER Black Sabbath Comp: https://magneticeyerecords.bandcamp.com/track/whores-cornucopiaAsschapel: https://asschapelsl.bandcamp.com/releasesBenjamin Smoke Documentary: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_NW9hU4nPUwThis week's submissions:Sheenjek - UncleverFrack - One in the Chamber Blank Banshee - Mindtrap Ikarass - Blood heavenVexing Hex - RevenantDJ Earl - BAAAABands! Submit one song (preferably from Bandcamp) to blyndsub@gmail.com and we'll try to cover it on another episode. Find us on social media @blyndsubmyshynz. If you like the podcast, subscribe, share it with your friend, or head over to our to watch the video version!https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCi_8QVmx1ggBQHGKln88UNwTheme song by Francis Anger Roberts Logo by Nick Fox

This time I had Jean Michel Lemieux or short JML, the CTO of

In this podcast, The Critic's political editor, Graham Stewart, talks to the author of The Elephant in the Room, the entrepreneur John Mills, chairman of the consumer goods company JML and the Labour Party's largest individual donor, about how the UK's manufacturing base could be revived through policies designed to sustain a more competitive exchange rate. -- Don't forget to subscribe to the podcast on Spotify and iTunes to ensure you never you never miss an episode. Right now we're offering 3 months for just £5. Go to thecritic.imbmsubscriptions.com/ for details. __ Music: “Modern Jazz Samba” Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com) Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 4.0 License creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

In this podcast, The Critic's political editor, Graham Stewart, talks to the author of The Elephant in the Room, the entrepreneur John Mills, chairman of the consumer goods company JML and the Labour Party's largest individual donor, about how the UK's manufacturing base could be revived through policies designed to sustain a more competitive exchange rate. -- Don't forget to subscribe to the podcast on Spotify and iTunes to ensure you never you never miss an episode. Right now we're offering 3 months for just £5. Go to thecritic.imbmsubscriptions.com/ for details. __ Music: “Modern Jazz Samba” Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com) Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 4.0 License creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

It's just our luck to have two great co-hosts, Chantel and Craig, on this week's episode as we revisit McFly's theatrical debut in the 2006 cinematic masterpiece, Just My Luck. The four of us reminiscence about McFly's early days, British vs American reactions to the film, and Harry's facial piercings. Plus: There's a high-stakes song-ranking bracket where we put the songs from the JML album up against each other and force them to compete. Which one will come out on top?*A podcast all about McFly, McWho is hosted by best friends who've grown tired of other Americans asking who they mean when they mention their favorite band. They've always been alone with their love--until now! Following the evolution of McFly's music throughout the years, one hit single at a time, this podcast is by fans, for fans.*Twitter, Instagram, & Facebook: @McWhothePodcastEmail: mcwhothepodcast@gmail.com Intro/Outro credit: "La Bamba" by Jules Grandgagnage (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:La_bamba_chords_cfg7.ogg)

With the 2020/21 Season bearing down on us, the boys are joined by super charity marathon runner Nik Weeks to talk about the two pre-season wins against Bristol Manor Farm and Exeter City, as well as the signings of Zain Westbrooke and Jayden Mitchell-Lawson.With two games to discuss, the guys look over the new 3-4-3 shape Ben Garner seems to be favouring, as well as individual performances that have stood out so far.Duke talks JML in the #10 role, Nik thinks we still need another striker, and Max has a theory on why Saturday's ref refused to officiate beyond the 90 minutes.Donate to Nik's JustGiving page here: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/nik-weeksKahuna Flooring Kahuna Flooring offer deals on supplied & fitted carpets, vinyls, LVT, engineered wood and more! Support the show (https://patreon.com/gascast)

Original Air Date: 5/11/2016 Dave, Charlie and JML come back on the air for this new edition of Open Mic Wrestling Night! This edition we talk some RAW, SmackDown, NXT then we are joined by current reigning and defending WOW No Limits Champion, Darius Carter. This is a show you don't want to miss!