Podcasts about mip

Vierdimensionale Elefanten, YouTube-Shitstorms, vertauschte Körper und jede Menge Donuts. Karo, Demian und Manon schauen auf ein Jahr voller „Geschichten aus der Mathematik“ zurück. (00:01:59) Trolley Problems bei den DMV Topic Days (00:11:08) Trolley Problems bei den Geschichten aus der Mathematik (00:46:16) Verabschiedung (00:47:58) Best of „Geschichten aus der Mathematik“-Outtakes Wir freuen uns über Fragen, Anregungen und Feedback an podcast@spektrum.de. Die Idee für diesen Podcast hat Demian Nahuel Goos am MIP.labor entwickelt, der Ideenwerkstatt für Wissenschaftsjournalismus zu Mathematik, Informatik und Physik an der Freien Universität Berlin, ermöglicht durch die Klaus Tschira Stiftung. >> Artikel zum Nachlesen: https://detektor.fm/wissen/geschichten-aus-der-mathematik-jahresrueckblick-2025

Vierdimensionale Elefanten, YouTube-Shitstorms, vertauschte Körper und jede Menge Donuts. Karo, Demian und Manon schauen auf ein Jahr voller „Geschichten aus der Mathematik“ zurück. (00:01:59) Trolley Problems bei den DMV Topic Days (00:11:08) Trolley Problems bei den Geschichten aus der Mathematik (00:46:16) Verabschiedung (00:47:58) Best of „Geschichten aus der Mathematik“-Outtakes Wir freuen uns über Fragen, Anregungen und Feedback an podcast@spektrum.de. Die Idee für diesen Podcast hat Demian Nahuel Goos am MIP.labor entwickelt, der Ideenwerkstatt für Wissenschaftsjournalismus zu Mathematik, Informatik und Physik an der Freien Universität Berlin, ermöglicht durch die Klaus Tschira Stiftung. >> Artikel zum Nachlesen: https://detektor.fm/wissen/geschichten-aus-der-mathematik-jahresrueckblick-2025

Vierdimensionale Elefanten, YouTube-Shitstorms, vertauschte Körper und jede Menge Donuts. Karo, Demian und Manon schauen auf ein Jahr voller „Geschichten aus der Mathematik“ zurück. (00:01:59) Trolley Problems bei den DMV Topic Days (00:11:08) Trolley Problems bei den Geschichten aus der Mathematik (00:46:16) Verabschiedung (00:47:58) Best of „Geschichten aus der Mathematik“-Outtakes Wir freuen uns über Fragen, Anregungen und Feedback an podcast@spektrum.de. Die Idee für diesen Podcast hat Demian Nahuel Goos am MIP.labor entwickelt, der Ideenwerkstatt für Wissenschaftsjournalismus zu Mathematik, Informatik und Physik an der Freien Universität Berlin, ermöglicht durch die Klaus Tschira Stiftung. >> Artikel zum Nachlesen: https://detektor.fm/wissen/geschichten-aus-der-mathematik-jahresrueckblick-2025

Do your patients really have two bites? Does their bite change when they lie down? When they sleep? And how can you explain centric relation, posture, and deprogramming in a way that patients actually understand? Dr. Bobby Supple joins Jaz for a powerful episode unpacking one of the most misunderstood topics in occlusion: the daytime chewing bite versus the nighttime airway bite. After spending days with Bobby in his New Mexico clinic, Jaz saw firsthand how simply and elegantly Bobby communicates concepts that usually leave patients — and dentists — confused. Together, they explore why bite discrepancies exist, what happens when the condyles fully seat, and how aligning Bite One and Bite Two over time can transform patient comfort and restorative outcomes. https://youtu.be/EC_qxUF7GxI Watch PDP252 on YouTube Protrusive Dental Pearl When assessing abfractions, always check the patient's bite in two positions: seated upright and lying back. Posture subtly shifts the condylar position and can change how forces load the tooth. Want more gems like this? AskJaz — your on-demand dental brain, will be soon baked right into the Protrusive App. Key Takeaways: Every patient has two bites — their upright chewing bite and their horizontal airway bite. Posture changes the condylar position more than we realise. Clear communication can make complex occlusion concepts instantly understandable. Aligning Bite One and Bite Two over time leads to healthier joints and more predictable dentistry. Highlights of this episode: 03:36  Pearl – Assessing Abfractions 06:47 Dr. Bobby Supple’s Journey to Dentistry 10:46 Confusion Around Centric Relation 13:22 Exploring T-Scan Technology 21:40 The Evolution of Digital Occlusion 27:05 Effect of Sitting vs. Reclined Position 32:03 Airway and Skeletal Asymmetry 37:19 Bite Philosophy and Treatment 42:10 Orthotics and Long-term Care 52:13 Preventive Dental Care 58:18 Ask Jaz AI (Beta Launch)

Felix Klein ist der Mathematiker hinter der berühmten „Kleinschen Flasche“ — und der entscheidende Mann im ewigen Wettstreit zwischen Berlin und Göttingen. Wir freuen uns über Fragen, Anregungen und Feedback an podcast@spektrum.de. Die Idee für diesen Podcast hat Demian Nahuel Goos am MIP.labor entwickelt, der Ideenwerkstatt für Wissenschaftsjournalismus zu Mathematik, Informatik und Physik an der Freien Universität Berlin, ermöglicht durch die Klaus Tschira Stiftung. (00:00:04) Einleitung (00:02:55) Felix Klein und seine „Flasche“ (00:05:04) „Sei niemals langweilig!“ (00:08:02) Das Mathe-Battle Göttingen vs. Berlin (00:14:05) Der Streit um die Funktionen (00:21:04) Die Kleinsche Flasche und das Möbiusband (00:26:56) Das Dimensionen-Problem und der Kleinsche Elefant (00:30:39) Demians und Manons Gedanken zur Kleinschen Flasche (00:33:14) Ausblick & Verabschiedung >> Artikel zum Nachlesen: https://detektor.fm/wissen/geschichten-aus-der-mathematik-felix-klein

Felix Klein ist der Mathematiker hinter der berühmten „Kleinschen Flasche“ — und der entscheidende Mann im ewigen Wettstreit zwischen Berlin und Göttingen. Wir freuen uns über Fragen, Anregungen und Feedback an podcast@spektrum.de. Die Idee für diesen Podcast hat Demian Nahuel Goos am MIP.labor entwickelt, der Ideenwerkstatt für Wissenschaftsjournalismus zu Mathematik, Informatik und Physik an der Freien Universität Berlin, ermöglicht durch die Klaus Tschira Stiftung. (00:00:04) Einleitung (00:02:55) Felix Klein und seine „Flasche“ (00:05:04) „Sei niemals langweilig!“ (00:08:02) Das Mathe-Battle Göttingen vs. Berlin (00:14:05) Der Streit um die Funktionen (00:21:04) Die Kleinsche Flasche und das Möbiusband (00:26:56) Das Dimensionen-Problem und der Kleinsche Elefant (00:30:39) Demians und Manons Gedanken zur Kleinschen Flasche (00:33:14) Ausblick & Verabschiedung >> Artikel zum Nachlesen: https://detektor.fm/wissen/geschichten-aus-der-mathematik-felix-klein

Felix Klein ist der Mathematiker hinter der berühmten „Kleinschen Flasche“ — und der entscheidende Mann im ewigen Wettstreit zwischen Berlin und Göttingen. Wir freuen uns über Fragen, Anregungen und Feedback an podcast@spektrum.de. Die Idee für diesen Podcast hat Demian Nahuel Goos am MIP.labor entwickelt, der Ideenwerkstatt für Wissenschaftsjournalismus zu Mathematik, Informatik und Physik an der Freien Universität Berlin, ermöglicht durch die Klaus Tschira Stiftung. (00:00:04) Einleitung (00:02:55) Felix Klein und seine „Flasche“ (00:05:04) „Sei niemals langweilig!“ (00:08:02) Das Mathe-Battle Göttingen vs. Berlin (00:14:05) Der Streit um die Funktionen (00:21:04) Die Kleinsche Flasche und das Möbiusband (00:26:56) Das Dimensionen-Problem und der Kleinsche Elefant (00:30:39) Demians und Manons Gedanken zur Kleinschen Flasche (00:33:14) Ausblick & Verabschiedung >> Artikel zum Nachlesen: https://detektor.fm/wissen/geschichten-aus-der-mathematik-felix-klein

In this episode, I break down the real differences between the VA loan and the FHA loan, two programs that often get compared but serve very different needs. I walk through eligibility, credit score requirements, down payment expectations, and how lenders look at debt-to-income ratios. I also explain the real-world costs—like PMI, MIP, and funding fees—and why these details matter more than most people realize. As I go through each side-by-side factor, I highlight what gives the VA loan such an edge for qualified borrowers.   Timestamps (00:00) — Intro (01:24) — Loan eligibility explained (02:49) — PMI and funding fees (04:56) — Why VA loan usually wins (05:29) — Final thoughts   About the Show On the Military Millionaire Podcast, I share real conversations with service members, veterans, and their families. Each week, we explore how to build wealth through personal finance, entrepreneurship, and real estate investing. Resources & Links Download a free copy of my book: https://www.frommilitarytomillionaire.com/free-book Sign up for free webinar trainings: https://www.frommilitarytomillionaire.com/register Join our investor list: https://www.frommilitarytomillionaire.com/investors Apply for The War Room Mastermind: https://www.frommilitarytomillionaire.com/mastermind-application Get an intro to recommended VA agents/lenders: https://www.frommilitarytomillionaire.com/va-realtor Guide to raising capital: https://www.frommilitarytomillionaire.com/capital-raising-guide   Connect with David Pere Facebook Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/militarymillionaire YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@Frommilitarytomillionaire?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/frommilitarytomillionaire/ LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/david-pere/ X (Twitter): https://x.com/militaryrei TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@militarymillionaire

A couple of new G-Shocks have been released that feature something enthusiasts have been begging for for ages! That's right, the regular classic square lines finally feature MIP, or memory-in-pixel screens. This is the single largest overhaul to G-Shock squares since they debuted back in 1983! Tune in and hear our thoughts…Give us a follow, and feel free to reach out to us on Instagram: @lumeplottersOr… leave us an audio comment using the link below, and we may just play it in an upcoming episode: https://www.speakpipe.com/lumeplotters

Reverend Dr. William Bennett of Good Success Church, Dr. A. Lionel Edmonds of Mount Lebanon Baptist Church, and Reverend William Spencer of Alfred Street Baptist Church join MIP on 89.3 wpfw.org to discuss the spiritual and social responsibility of churches during a time of intense housing stress.Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Die versammelte Redaktion von Spektrum der Wissenschaft scheitert daran, das Haus vom Nikolaus zu zeichnen. Was ist da los? In dieser Geschichte aus der Mathematik springen wir zu den Anfängen der Graphentheorie, ins Königsberg des 18. Jahrhunderts. Wir sind ein Türchen im Podcast-Adventskalender 2025 von Wissenschaftspodcasts.de! Hier geht’s zum ganzen Adventskalender: wissenschaftspodcasts.de/adventskalender2025 Wir freuen uns über Fragen, Anregungen und Feedback an podcast@spektrum.de. Die Idee für diesen Podcast hat Demian Nahuel Goos am MIP.labor entwickelt, der Ideenwerkstatt für Wissenschaftsjournalismus zu Mathematik, Informatik und Physik an der Freien Universität Berlin, ermöglicht durch die Klaus Tschira Stiftung. (00:00:00) Intro (00:01:37) Begrüßung (00:03:19) „Das Haus vom Nikolaus“ und was es mit Mathe zu tun hat (00:06:46) Das Königsberger Brückenproblem (00:11:59) Euler, das Haus vom Nikolaus, und die Graphentheorie (00:18:37) Fazit und das eigentlich Schöne am Studium >> Artikel zum Nachlesen: https://detektor.fm/wissen/geschichten-aus-der-mathematik-haus-vom-nikolaus-graphentheorie-euler

Die versammelte Redaktion von Spektrum der Wissenschaft scheitert daran, das Haus vom Nikolaus zu zeichnen. Was ist da los? In dieser Geschichte aus der Mathematik springen wir zu den Anfängen der Graphentheorie, ins Königsberg des 18. Jahrhunderts. Wir sind ein Türchen im Podcast-Adventskalender 2025 von Wissenschaftspodcasts.de! Hier geht’s zum ganzen Adventskalender: wissenschaftspodcasts.de/adventskalender2025 Wir freuen uns über Fragen, Anregungen und Feedback an podcast@spektrum.de. Die Idee für diesen Podcast hat Demian Nahuel Goos am MIP.labor entwickelt, der Ideenwerkstatt für Wissenschaftsjournalismus zu Mathematik, Informatik und Physik an der Freien Universität Berlin, ermöglicht durch die Klaus Tschira Stiftung. (00:00:00) Intro (00:01:37) Begrüßung (00:03:19) „Das Haus vom Nikolaus“ und was es mit Mathe zu tun hat (00:06:46) Das Königsberger Brückenproblem (00:11:59) Euler, das Haus vom Nikolaus, und die Graphentheorie (00:18:37) Fazit und das eigentlich Schöne am Studium >> Artikel zum Nachlesen: https://detektor.fm/wissen/geschichten-aus-der-mathematik-haus-vom-nikolaus-graphentheorie-euler

Die versammelte Redaktion von Spektrum der Wissenschaft scheitert daran, das Haus vom Nikolaus zu zeichnen. Was ist da los? In dieser Geschichte aus der Mathematik springen wir zu den Anfängen der Graphentheorie, ins Königsberg des 18. Jahrhunderts. Wir sind ein Türchen im Podcast-Adventskalender 2025 von Wissenschaftspodcasts.de! Hier geht’s zum ganzen Adventskalender: wissenschaftspodcasts.de/adventskalender2025 Wir freuen uns über Fragen, Anregungen und Feedback an podcast@spektrum.de. Die Idee für diesen Podcast hat Demian Nahuel Goos am MIP.labor entwickelt, der Ideenwerkstatt für Wissenschaftsjournalismus zu Mathematik, Informatik und Physik an der Freien Universität Berlin, ermöglicht durch die Klaus Tschira Stiftung. (00:00:00) Intro (00:01:37) Begrüßung (00:03:19) „Das Haus vom Nikolaus“ und was es mit Mathe zu tun hat (00:06:46) Das Königsberger Brückenproblem (00:11:59) Euler, das Haus vom Nikolaus, und die Graphentheorie (00:18:37) Fazit und das eigentlich Schöne am Studium >> Artikel zum Nachlesen: https://detektor.fm/wissen/geschichten-aus-der-mathematik-haus-vom-nikolaus-graphentheorie-euler

Dziś w Palmie hajpujemy rozstrzygający dzień NBA Cup, rozmawiamy o braku Dillona Brooksa w odds na MIP, o gazach Donovana Mitchella, o futerku Ricka Foxa, o nominacji kardynała Rysia na Biskupa Rysia, o ciastkach Cedrica Cowarda, postawionej na głowie koszykówce Gary'ego Vitti, zaglądamy do naszego klubu książkowego, do nowości kina queerowego i prezentujemy kolejny odcinek […]

Let's be honest – the occlusion after Aligner cases can be a little ‘off' (even after fixed appliances!) How do you know if your patient's occlusion after aligner treatment is acceptable or risky? What practical guidelines can general dentists follow to manage occlusion when orthodontic results aren't textbook-perfect? Jaz and Dr. Jesper Hatt explore the most common challenges dentists face, from ClinCheck errors and digital setup pitfalls to balancing aesthetics with functional occlusion. They also discuss key strategies to help you evaluate, guide, and optimize occlusion in your patients, because understanding what is acceptable and what needs intervention can make all the difference in long-term treatment stability and patient satisfaction. https://youtu.be/e74lUbyTCaA Watch PDP250 on YouTube Protrusive Dental Pearl: Harmony and Occlusal Compatibility Always ensure restorative anatomy suits the patient's natural occlusal scheme and age-related wear. If opposing teeth are flat and amalgam-filled, polished cuspal anatomy will be incompatible — flatten as needed to conform. Need to Read it? Check out the Full Episode Transcript below! Key Takeaways Common mistakes in ClinCheck planning often stem from occlusion issues. Effective communication and documentation are crucial in clinical support. Occlusion must be set correctly to ensure successful treatment outcomes. Understanding the patient’s profile is essential for effective orthodontics. Collaboration between GPs and orthodontists can enhance patient care. Retention of orthodontic results is a lifelong commitment. Aesthetic goals must align with functional occlusion in treatment planning. Informed consent is critical when discussing potential surgical interventions. The tongue plays a crucial role in orthodontic outcomes. Spacing cases should often be approached as restorative cases. Aligners can achieve precise spacing more effectively than fixed appliances. Enamel adjustments may be necessary for optimal occlusion post-treatment. Retention strategies must be tailored to individual patient needs. Case assessment is vital for determining treatment complexity. Highlights of this episode: 00:00 Teaser 00:59 Intro 02:53  Pearl – Harmony and Occlusal Compatibility 05:57 Dr. Jesper Hatt Introduction 07:34 Clinical Support Systems 10:18 Occlusion and Aligner Therapy 20:41 Bite Recording Considerations 25:32 Collaborative Approach in Orthodontics 30:31 Occlusal Goals vs. Aesthetic Goals 31:42 Midroll 35:03 Occlusal Goals vs. Aesthetic Goals 35:25 Challenges with Spacing Cases 42:19 Occlusion Checkpoints After Aligners 50:17 Considerations for Retention 54:55 Case Assessment and Treatment Planning 58:14 Key Lessons and Final Thoughts 01:00:19 Interconnectedness of Body and Teeth 01:02:48 Resources for Dentists and Case Support 01:04:40 Outro Free Aligner Case Support!Send your patient's case number and get a full assessment in 24 hours—easy, moderate, complex, or referral. Plus, access our 52-point planning protocol and 2-min photo course. No uploads, no cost. [Get Free Access Now] Learn more at alignerservice.com If you enjoyed this episode, don't miss: Do's and Don'ts of Aligners [STRAIGHTPRIL] – PDP071 #PDPMainEpisodes #OcclusionTMDandSplints #OrthoRestorative This episode is eligible for 1 CE credit via the quiz on Protrusive Guidance. This episode meets GDC Outcomes A and C. AGD Subject Code: 370 ORTHODONTICS (Functional orthodontic therapy) Aim: To provide general dentists with practical guidance for managing occlusion in aligner therapy, from bite capture to retention, including common pitfalls, functional considerations, and case selection. Dentists will be able to – Identify common errors in digital bite capture and occlusion setup. Understand the impact of anterior inclination and mandibular movement patterns on occlusal stability. Plan retention strategies appropriate for aligner and restorative cases. Click below for full episode transcript: Teaser: The one thing that we always check initially is the occlusion set correct by the aligner company. Because if the occlusion is not set correctly, everything else just doesn't matter because the teeth will move, but into a wrong position because the occlusion is off from the beginning. I don't know about you, but if half the orthodontists are afraid of controlling the root movements in extraction cases, as a GP, I would be terrified. Teaser:I don’t care if you just move from premolar to premolar or all the teeth. Orthodontics is orthodontics, so you will affect all the teeth during the treatment. The question’s just how much. Imagine going to a football stadium. The orthodontist will be able to find the football stadium.  If it’s a reasonable orthodontist, he’ll be able to find the section you’re going to sit in, and if he’s really, really, really good, he will be able to find the row that you’re going to sit in, but the exact spot where you are going to sit… he will never, ever be able to find that with orthodontics. Jaz’s Introduction: Hello, Protruserati. I’m Jaz Gulati. Welcome back to your favorite dental podcast. I’m joined today by our guest, Dr. Jesper Hatt. All this dentist does is help other dentists with their treatment plans for aligners. From speaking to him, I gather that he’s no longer practicing clinically and is full-time clinical support for colleagues for their aligner cases. So there’s a lot we can learn from someone who day in day out has to do so much treatment planning and speaking to GDPs about their cases, how they’re tracking, how they’re not tracking, complications, and then years of seeing again, okay, how well did that first set of aligners actually perform? What is predictable and what isn’t? And as well as asking what are the most common errors we make on our ClinChecks or treatment plan softwares. I really wanted to probe in further. I really want to ask him about clinical guidelines for occlusion after ortho. Sometimes we treat a case and whilst the aesthetics of that aligner case is beautiful, the occlusion is sometimes not as good. So let’s talk about what that actually means. What is a not-good occlusion? What is a good occlusion? And just to offer some guidelines for practitioners to follow because guess what? No orthodontist in the world is gonna ever get the occlusion correct through ortho. Therefore, we as GPs are never gonna get a perfect textbook occlusion, but we need to understand what is acceptable and what is a good guideline to follow. That’s exactly what we’ll present to you in this episode today. Dental PearlNow, this is a CE slash CPD eligible episode and as our main PDP episode, I’ll give you a Protrusive Dental Pearl. Today’s pearl is very much relevant to the theme of orthodontics and occlusion we’re discussing today, and it’s probably a pearl I’ve given to you already in the past somewhere down the line, but it’s so important and so key. I really want to just emphasize on it again. In fact, a colleague messaged me recently and it reminded me of this concept I’m about to explain. She sent me an image of a resin bonded bridge she did, which had failed. It was a lower incisor, and just a few days after bonding, it failed. And so this dentist is feeling a bit embarrassed and wanted my advice. Now, by the way, guys, if you message me for advice on Instagram, on Facebook, or something like that, it’s very hit and miss. Like my priorities in life are family, health, and everything that happens on Protrusive Guidance. Our network. If you message me outside that network, I may not see it. The team might, but I may not see it. It’s the only way that I can really maintain control and calm in my life. The reason for saying this, I don’t want anyone to be offended. I’m not ignoring anyone. It’s just the volume of messages I get year on year, they’re astronomical. And I don’t mind if you nudge me. If you messaged me something weeks or months ago and I haven’t replied, I probably haven’t seen it. Please do nudge me. And the best place to catch me on is Protrusive Guidance. If you DM me on Protrusive Guidance, home of the nicest and geekiest dentists in the world, that’s the only platform I will log in daily. That’s our baby, our community. Anyway, so I caught this Facebook message and it was up to me to help this colleague. And one observation I made is that the lower teeth were all worn. The upper teeth were really worn, but this resin bonded bridge pontic, it just looked like a perfect tooth. The patient was something like 77 or 80. So it really made me think that, okay, why are we putting something that looks like a 25-year-old’s tooth in a 77-year-old? But even forgetting age and stuff, you have to look at the adjacent teeth in the arch. Is your restoration harmonious with the other teeth in the arch, and of course is the restoration harmonious with what’s opposing it? Because it’s just not compatible. So part one of this pearl is make sure any restoration you do, whether it’s direct or indirect, is harmonious with the patient’s arch and with the opposing teeth and with their occlusal scheme. Because otherwise, if you get rubber dam on and you give your 75-year-old patient beautiful composite resin, it’s got all that cuspal fissure pattern and anatomy, and you take that rubber dam off and you notice that all the other teeth are flat and the opposing teeth are flat amalgams, guess what? You’re gonna be making your composite flat, whether you like it or not. You created a restoration that’s proud, right? That’s why you did not conform to the patient’s own arch or existing anatomical scheme. So the part B of this is the thing that I get very excited to talk about, right? So sometimes you have a worn dentition, but then you have one tooth that’s not worn at all. It’s like that in-standing lateral incisor, right? Think of an upper lateral incisor that’s a bit in-standing, and you see some wear on all the incisors, but that lateral incisor does not have any wear in it because it was never in the firing line. It was never in function. It was never in parafunction. Now, if you give this patient aligners or fixed appliances, you’re doing ortho and you’re now going to align this lateral incisor. So it’s now gonna eventually get into occlusion and it will be in the functional and parafunctional pathways of this patient. Do you really think you can just leave that incisor be? No. It’s not gonna be compatible with the adjacent teeth. It’s not going to be compatible with the opposing tooth and the occlusal scheme. So guess what? You have to get your bur out or your Sof-Lex disc out, and you have to bake in some years into that tooth. Or you have to build up all the other teeth if appropriate for that patient. You’ve just gotta think about it. And I hope that makes sense so you can stay out of trouble. You’re not gonna get chipping and you can consent your patient appropriately for enamel adjustment, which is something that we do talk about in this episode. I think you’re in for an absolute cracker. I hope you enjoy. I’ll catch you in the outro. Main Episode: Doctor Jesper Hatt, thank you so much for coming to Protrusive Dental Podcast. We met in Scandinavia, in Copenhagen. You delivered this wonderful lecture and it was so nice to connect with you then and to finally have you on the show. Tell us, how are you, where in the world are you, and tell us about yourself. [Jesper] Well, thank you for the invitation, first of all. Well, I’m a dentist. I used to practice in Denmark since I originally come from Denmark. My mother’s from Germany, and now I live in Switzerland and have stopped practicing dentistry since 2018. Now I only do consulting work and I help doctors around the world with making their aligner business successful. [Jaz] And this is like probably clinical advice, but also like strategic advice and positioning and that kinda stuff. Probably the whole shebang, right? [Jesper] Yeah. I mean, I have a team around me, so my wife’s a dentist as well, and I would say she’s the expert in Europe on clear aligners. She’s been working for, first of all, our practice. She’s a dentist too. She worked with me in the practice. We practiced together for 10 years. Then she became a clinical advisor for Allion Tech with responsibility for clinical support of Scandinavia. She was headhunted to ClearCorrect, worked in Basel while I was doing more and more consulting stuff in Denmark. So she was traveling back and forth, and I considered this to be a little bit challenging for our family. So I asked her, well, why don’t we just relocate to Switzerland since ClearCorrect is located there? And sure we did. And after two years she told me, I think clinical support, it’s okay. And I like to train the teams, but I’d really like to do more than that because she found out that doctors, they were able to book a spot sometime in the future, let’s say two weeks out in the future at a time that suited the doctors… no, not the doctors, ClearCorrect. Or Invisalign or whatever clear aligner company you use. So as a doctor, you’re able to block the spot and at that time you can have your 30 minutes one-on-one online with a clinical expert. And she said it’s always between the patients or administrative stuff. So they’re not really focused on their ClearCorrect or clear aligner patient. And so they forget half of what I tell them. I can see it in the setups they do. They end up having to call me again. It doesn’t work like that. I would like to help them. [Jaz] It’s a clunky pathway of mentorship. [Jesper] Yes. And so she wanted to change the way clinical support was built up. So we do it differently. We do it only in writing so people can remember what we are telling them. They can always go back in the note and see what’s been going on, what was the advice we gave them, and we offer this co-creation support where we take over most of the treatment planning of the ClearCorrect or Clear Aligner or Spark or Invisalign or Angel Aligner treatment planning. So we do all the digital planning for the doctor, deliver what we think would be right for the patient based on the feedback we initially got from the doctor. And then the doctor can come back and say, well, I’d like a little more space for some crowns in the front, or I would like the canines to be in a better position in order to achieve immediate post disclusion. And so we can go into this discussion back and forth and adjust the digital setup in a way that is more realistic and predictable and do it all for the doctors. So they, on an average, they spend four to six hours less chair time when they use that kind of service compared to if they do everything themselves. And on top of that, you can put your planning time. She was responsible for that and it works quite well. I still remember when we initially got on all these online calls and we would see fireworks in the background and confetti coming down from the top and all of that. [Jaz] Exactly. So excuse that little bit, but okay. So essentially what you’re doing is, for an aligner user myself, for example, you’re doing the ClinChecks, you are helping, supporting with the ClinChecks, the planning. And I’ve got a lot of questions about that. The first question I’ll start with, which is off the script, but there’s probably a hundred different mistakes that could happen in a ClinCheck, right? But what is the most repeatable, predictable, common mistake that you’ll see when a new user sends a case to you to help them with their planning? What’s the most common mistake that you will see in a setup? [Jesper] Two things, actually. The one thing that we always check initially is the occlusion set correct by the aligner company. Because if the occlusion is not set correctly, everything else just doesn’t matter because the teeth will move but into a wrong position because the occlusion is off from the beginning. And so we always check that as the first part. How does this— [Jaz] So let’s talk about that ’cause that might be confusing for a younger colleague because they’re like, hey, hang on a minute. I scanned the bite left and right. What do you mean the occlusion is wrong? Because surely that gets carried through into what I see on the ClinCheck. So what do you think is the mechanism for this to happen? [Jesper] Two different reasons. I’m from a time when I graduated in 2003, so that was before digital dentistry. So when I went to the Pankey Institute and learned everything about functional occlusion and all of that stuff, I also found out that most of my patients, when I put silicone impression material between the teeth and asked the patients to bite together, they would always protrude a little bit unless I instructed them to bite hard on the posterior teeth. And when we got the scanners, when we put a scanner into the cheek and pull the cheek, most patients, when we asked them to bite together to do the intraoral scan of the bite, they also protruded a little bit, not much, but enough to set the bite wrong. So that is the one challenge when the technicians of the aligner companies put the models together. The other challenge is that some of the aligner companies, they let the technicians set the models. We always, as the first thing when we see a case, we always look at the photos, the clinical photos. And that’s why the clinical photos have to be of great quality. So we look at the clinical photos of the patient— [Jaz] And also in those clinical photos, Jesper, you have to coach them correctly to bite. You have to notice if they’re biting wrong even in the photos ’cause then it just duplicates the error. And that’s why good photography and actually being able to coach the patient is so imperative. [Jesper] Yes, that’s correct. But we compare the two and usually if we see a difference, we ask the doctor, is what we see in the photo correct, or is what we see on the digital models correct? And because we don’t like differences. So that would be the first step to look for. And what’s the second? The second thing is that when you look at the setup, the anterior teeth are usually—I’m trying to show you—the anterior teeth are very, very steep. Typically with aligners it’s a lot easier to tip the crowns. So when you have a class II patient, deviation one, where the anteriors are in a forward position, proclined, and you have a lot of space between the anteriors of the maxilla and the mandible, then the easiest thing on a digital setup is to just retrocline the anteriors of the upper to make them fit the lowers, which you could then procline a little bit, but usually you have very steep relationships between the two and this— [Jaz] So you’re more likely to restrict the envelope of function, functional interference anteriorly. You are obviously reducing the overjet, but you may end up reducing like a wall contact rather than an elegant, more open gate. [Jesper] Yes. And there’s another dimension to this because when we work with orthodontics, one of the most important things to look for is actually the profile of the patient. Because let’s say I’m trying to illustrate this now, so I hope you get a 90— [Jaz] So describe it for our audio listeners as well. So we’re looking at a profile view of Jesper. [Jesper] Yes. So I’m turning the side to the camera. I hope you can see my profile here. So let’s say I had flared anterior maxillary teeth and I wanted to retrocline them. It would have an effect on my upper lip, so the lip would fall backwards if I just retrocline everything. And every millimeter we move the anteriors in the maxilla in a posterior direction, we will have a potential lip drop of three millimeters. In addition, if we don’t get the nasolabial angulation correct, we risk the lower face will simply disappear in the face of the patient. So soft tissue plays a role here, so we cannot just retrocline the teeth. It looks great on the computer screen, but when it comes to reality, we’ll have a functional challenge. We’ll have a soft tissue support challenge, and in addition we’ll have long-term retention challenges as well. Because when you have a steep inclination, the anterior teeth in the mandible, they don’t have any kind of support. They will not be stopped by anything in the maxillary teeth, which you would if you had the right inclination between the teeth, which would be about 120 degrees. So why do aligner companies always set the teeth straight up and down in the anterior part? We wondered about this for years. We don’t have a strict answer. We don’t know exactly why it’s like this, but I have a hunch. I think there are two things to it. First of all, the easiest thing to do with aligners is to move the crown, so we can just tip the teeth. You take them back, you make a lot of IPR, and then you just tip them so they’re retroclined. Secondly, all aligner companies, they come from the United States. And in the United States there is a higher representation of class III patients. Now why is that important? All our patients can be put into two different categories in regards to how they move their mandible. They are the crocodiles that only open and close, like move up and down, and then we have the cows. And then we have the cows that move the mandible around, or the camels. I mean, every camel, if you’ve seen a camel chew, it’s just moving from side to side. [Jaz] Horses as well. Horses as well. [Jesper] They kind of do that. [Jaz] But I’m glad you didn’t say rats ’cause it’s more elegant to be a crocodile than a rat. [Jesper] Exactly. And I usually say we only tell the crocodiles. So why is this a challenge and why isn’t it a challenge with class III patients? Well, all real class III patients act like crocodiles, so they don’t move them side to side. From a functional perspective, it’s really not a problem having steep anterior inclination or steep relationships as long as you have a stable stop where the anteriors—so the anteriors will not elongate and create the red effect. So they just elongate until they hit the palate. If you can make a stop in the anterior part of the occlusion, then you’ll have some kind of stability with the class III patients. But with class II patients, we see a lot more cows. So they move the mandible from side to side and anterior and back and forth and all… they have the mandible going all kinds of places. And when they do that, we need some kind of anterior guidance to guide the mandible. I usually say the upper jaw creates the framework in which the mandible will move. So if the framework is too small, we fight the muscles. And whenever we fight the muscles, we lose because muscles always win. It doesn’t matter if it’s teeth, if it’s bone, if it’s joints, they all lose if they fight the muscles— [Jaz] As Peter Dawson would say, in the war between teeth and muscles or any system and muscles, the muscles always win. Absolutely. And the other analogy you remind me of is the maxilla being like a garage or “garage” from UK, like a garage. And the mandible being like the car, and if you’re really constrained, you’re gonna crash in and you’re gonna… everything will be in tatters. So that’s another great way to think about it. Okay. That’s very, very helpful. I’m gonna—’cause there’s so much I wanna cover. And I think you’ve really summed up nicely. But one thing just to finish on this aspect of that common mistake being that the upper anteriors are retroclined, really what you’re trying to say is we need to be looking at other modalities, other movements. So I’m thinking you’re saying extraction, if it’s suitable for the face, or distalisation. Are you thinking like that rather than the easier thing for the aligners, which is the retrocline. Am I going about it the right way? [Jesper] Depends on the patient. [Jaz] Of course. [Jesper] Rule of thumb: if you’re a GP, don’t ever touch extraction cases. Rule of thumb. Why? Because it is extremely challenging to move teeth parallel. So you will most—especially with aligners—I mean, I talk with a very respected orthodontist once and I asked him, well, what do you think about GPs treating extraction cases where they extract, you know, two premolars in the maxilla? And he said, well, I don’t know how to answer this. Let me just explain to you: half of my orthodontist colleagues, they are afraid of extraction cases. And I asked them why. Because it’s so hard to control the root movement. Now, I don’t know about you— [Jaz] With aligners. We’re specifically talking about aligners here, right? [Jesper] With all kinds of orthodontic appliances. [Jaz] Thank you. [Jesper] So now, I don’t know about you, but if half the orthodontists are afraid of controlling the root movements in extraction cases, as a GP, I would be terrified. And I am a GP. So I usually say, yeah, sometimes you will have so much crowding and so little space in the mandible, so there’s an incisor that is almost popped out by itself. In those cases, yes. Then you can do an extraction case. But when we’re talking about premolars that are going to be extracted, or if you want to close the space in the posterior part by translating a tooth into that open space, don’t. It’s just the easiest way to end up in a disaster because the only thing you’ll see is just teeth that tip into that space, and you’ll have a really hard time controlling the root movements, getting them corrected again. [Jaz] Well, thank you for offering that guideline. I think that’s very sage advice for those GPs doing aligners, to stay in your lane and just be… the best thing about being a GP, Jesper, is you get to cherry pick, right? There’s so many bad things about being a GP. Like you literally have to be kinda like a micro-specialist in everything in a way. And so sometimes it’s good to be like, you know what, I’ll keep this and I’ll send this out. And being selective and case selection is the crux of everything. So I’m really glad you mentioned that. I mean, we talked and touched already on so much occlusion. The next question I’m gonna ask you then is, like you said, a common error is the bite and how the bite appears on the ClinCheck or whichever software a dentist is using. Now, related to bite, vast majority of orthodontic cases are treated in the patient’s existing habitual occlusion, their maximum intercuspal position. Early on in my aligner journey, I had a patient who had an anterior crossbite. And because of that anterior crossbite, their jaw deviated. It was a displaced—the lower jaw displaced. And then I learned from that, that actually for that instance, perhaps I should not have used an MIP scan. I should have used more like centric relation or first point of contact scan before the displacement of the jaw happens. So that was like always in my mind. Sometimes we can and should be using an alternative TMJ position or a bite reference other than MIP. Firstly, what do you think about that kind of scenario and are there any other scenarios which you would suggest that we should not be using the patient’s habitual occlusion for their bite scan for planning orthodontics? [Jesper] Well, I mentioned that I was trained at the Pankey Institute, and when you start out right after—I mean, I spent 400 hours over there. Initially, I thought I was a little bit brainwashed by that because I thought every single patient should be in centric relation. Now, after having put more than 600 patients on the bite appliance first before I did anything, I started to see some patterns. And so today, I would say it’s not all patients that I would get into centric relation before I start treating the teeth. But when we talk about aligner therapy and orthodontic treatment, I think it’s beneficial if you can see the signs for those patients where you would say, hmm, something in the occlusion here could be a little bit risky. So let’s say there are wear facets on the molars. That will always trigger a red flag in my head. Let’s say there are crossbites or bite positions that kind of lock in the teeth. We talked about class III patients before, and I said if it’s a real skeletal-deviation class III patient, it’s a crocodile. But sometimes patients are not real class III skeletal deviation patients. They’re simply being forced into a class III due to the occlusion. That’s where the teeth fit together. So once you put aligners between the teeth and plastic covers the surfaces, suddenly the patients are able to move the jaws more freely and then they start to seat into centric. That may be okay. Usually it is okay. The challenge is consequences. So when you’re a GP and you suddenly see a patient moving to centric relation and you find out, whoa, on a horizontal level there’s a four- to six-millimeter difference between the initial starting point and where we are now, and maybe we create an eight-millimeter open bite in the anterior as well because they simply seat that much. And I mean, we have seen it. So is this a disaster? Well, it depends. If you have informed the patient well enough initially and said, well, you might have a lower jaw that moves into a different position when we start out, and if this new position is really, really off compared to where you are right now, you might end up needing maxillofacial surgery, then the patient’s prepared. But if they’re not prepared and you suddenly have to tell them, you know, I think we might need maxillofacial surgery… I can come up with a lot of patients in my head that would say, hey doctor, that was not part of my plan. And they will be really disappointed. And at that point there’s no turning back, so you can’t reverse. So I think if you are unsure, then you are sure. Then you should use some kind of deprogramming device or figure out where is centric relation on this patient. If there isn’t that much of a difference between maximum intercuspation and centric— [Jesper] Relation, I don’t care. Because once you start moving the teeth, I don’t care if you just move from premolar to premolar or all the teeth. Orthodontics is orthodontics, so you will affect all the teeth during the treatment. The question’s just how much. And sometimes it’s just by putting plastic between the teeth that you will see a change, not in the tooth position, but in the mandibular position. And I just think it’s nicer to know a little bit where this is going before you start. And the more you see of this—I mean, as I mentioned, after 600 bite appliances in the mouths of my patients, I started to see patterns. And sometimes in the end, after 20 years of practicing, I started to say, let’s just start, see where this ends. But I would always inform the patients: if it goes totally out of control, we might end up needing surgery, and there’s no way to avoid it if that happens. And if the patients were okay with that, we’d just start out. Because I mean, is it bad? No. I just start the orthodontic treatment and I set the teeth as they should be in the right framework. Sometimes the upper and the lower jaw don’t fit together. Well, send them to the surgeon and they will move either the upper or the lower jaw into the right position, and then we have it. No harm is done because we have done the initial work that the orthodontist would do. But I will say when I had these surgical patients—let’s say we just started out with aligners and we figured, I can’t control this enough. I need a surgeon to look at this—then I would send them off to an orthodontist, and the orthodontist and the surgeon would take over. Because then—I mean, surgical patients and kids—that’s the second group of patients besides the extraction cases that I would not treat as a GP. ‘Cause we simply don’t know enough about how to affect growth on kids. And when it comes to surgery, there’s so much that is… so much knowledge that we need to know and the collaboration with the surgeons that we’re not trained to handle. So I think that should be handled by the orthodontists as well. [Jaz] I think collaborative cases like that are definitely specialist in nature, and I think that’s a really good point. I think the point there was informed consent. The mistake is you don’t warn the patient or you do not do the correct screening. So again, I always encourage my guests—so Jesper, you included—that we may disagree, and that’s okay. That’s the beauty of dentistry. So something that I look for is: if the patient has a stable and repeatable maximum intercuspal position, things lock very well, and there’s a minimal slide—like I use my leaf gauge and the CR-CP is like a small number of leaves and the jaw hardly moves a little bit—then there’s no point of uncoupling them, removing that nice posterior coupling that they have just to chase this elusive joint position. Then you have to do so many more teeth. But when we have a breakdown in the system, which you kind of said, if there’s wear as one aspect, or we think that, okay, this patient’s occlusion is not really working for them, then we have an opportunity to do full-mouth rehabilitation in enamel. Because that’s what orthodontics is. And so that’s a point to consider. So I would encourage our GP colleagues to look at the case, look at the patient in front of you, and decide: is this a stable, repeatable occlusion that you would like to use as a baseline, or is there something wrong? Then consider referring out or considering—if you’re more advanced in occlusion studies—using an alternative position, not the patient’s own bite as a reference. So anything you wanna add to that or disagree with in that monologue I just said there? [Jesper] No, I think there’s one thing I’d like the listeners to consider. I see a lot of fighting between orthodontists and GPs, and I think it should be a collaboration instead. There’s a lot of orthodontists that are afraid of GPs taking over more and more aligner treatments, and they see a huge increase in the amount of cases that go wrong. Well, there’s a huge increase of patients being treated, so there will be more patients, just statistically, that will get into problems. Now, if the orthodontist is smart—in my opinion, that’s my opinion—they reach out to all their referring doctors and they tell them, look, come in. I will teach you which cases you can start with and which you should refer. Let’s start there. Start your aligner treatments. Start out, try stuff. I will be there to help you if you run into problems. So whenever you see a challenge, whenever there’s a problem, send the patient over to me and I’ll take over. But I will be there to help you if anything goes wrong. Now, the reason this is really, really a great business advice for the orthodontists is because once you teach the GPs around you to look for deviations from the normal, which would be the indication for orthodontics, the doctors start to diagnose and see a lot more patients needing orthodontics and prescribe it to the patients, or at least propose it to the patients. Which would initially not do much more than just increase the amount of aligner treatments. But over time, I tell you, all the orthodontists doing this, they are drowning in work. So I mean, they will literally be overflown by patients being referred by all the doctors, because suddenly all the other doctors around them start to diagnose orthodontically. They see the patients which they haven’t seen before. So I think this is—from a business perspective—a really, really great thing for the orthodontists to have a collaboration with this. And it’ll also help the GPs to feel more secure when they start treating their patients. And in the end, that will lead to more patients getting the right treatment they deserve. And I think that is the core. That is what’s so important for us to remember. That’s what we’re here for. I mean, yes, it’s nice to make money. We have to live. It’s nice with a great business, but what all dentists I know of are really striving for is to treat their patients to the best of their ability. And this helps them to do that. [Jaz] Ultimate benefactor of this collaborative approach is the patient. And I love that you said that. I think I want all orthodontists to listen to that soundbite and take it on board and be willing to help. Most of them I know are lovely orthodontists and they’re helping to teach their GPs and help them and in return they get lots of referrals. And I think that’s the best way to go. Let’s talk a little bit about occlusal goals we look for at the end of orthodontics. This is an interesting topic. I’m gonna start by saying that just two days ago I got a DM from one of the Protruserati, his name is Keith Curry—shout out to him on Instagram—and he just sent me a little message: “Jaz, do you sometimes find that when you’re doing alignment as a GP that it’s conflicting the orthodontic, the occlusal goal you’re trying to get?” And I knew what I was getting to. It’s that scenario whereby you have the kind of class II division 2, right? But they have anterior guidance. Now you align everything, okay, and now you completely lost anterior guidance. And so the way I told him is that, you know what, yes, this is happening all the time. Are we potentially at war between an aesthetic smile and a functional occlusion? And sometimes there’s a compromise. Sometimes you can have both. But that—to achieve both—needs either a specialist set of eyes or lots of auxiliary techniques or a lot more time than what GPs usually give for their cases. So first let’s touch on that. Do you also agree that sometimes there is a war between what will be aesthetic and what will be a nice functional occlusion? And then we’ll actually talk about, okay, what are some of the guidelines that we look for at the end of completing an aligner case? [Jesper] Great question and great observation. I would say I don’t think there’s a conflict because what I’ve learned is form follows function. So if you get the function right, aesthetics will always be great. Almost always. I mean, we have those crazy-shaped faces sometimes, but… so form follows function. The challenge here is that in adult patients, we cannot manipulate growth. So a skeletal deviation is a skeletal deviation, which means if we have a class II patient, it’s most likely that that patient has a skeletal deviation. I rarely see a dental deviation. It happens, but it’s really, really rare. So that means that in principle, all our class II and chronic class III patients are surgical patients. However, does that mean that we should treat all our class II and class III patients surgically? No, I don’t think so. But we have to consider that they are all compromise cases. So we need to figure a compromise. So initially, when I started out with my occlusal knowledge, I have to admit, I didn’t do the orthodontic treatment planning. I did it with Heller, and she would give me feedback and tell me, I think this is doable and this is probably a little bit challenging. If we do this instead, we can keep the teeth within the bony frame. We can keep them in a good occlusion. Then I would say, well, you have a flat curve of Spee. I’d like to have a little bit of curve. It’s called a curve of Spee and not the orthodontic flat curve of Spee. And then we would have a discussion back and forth about that. Then initially I would always want anterior coupling where the anterior teeth would touch each other. I have actually changed that concept in my mind and accepted the orthodontic way of thinking because most orthodontists will leave a little space in the anterior. So when you end the orthodontic treatment, you almost always have a little bit of space between the anterior teeth so they don’t touch each other. Why? Because no matter what, no matter how you retain the patient after treatment, there will still be some sort of relapse. And we don’t know where it’ll come or how, but it will come. Because the teeth will always be positioned in a balance between the push from the tongue and from the cheeks and the muscles surrounding the teeth. And that’s a dynamic that changes over the years. So I don’t see retention as a one- or two-year thing. It’s a lifelong thing. And the surrounding tissues will change the pressure and thereby the balance between the tongue and the cheeks and where the teeth would naturally settle into position. Now, that said, as I mentioned initially, if we fight the muscles, we’ll lose. So let’s say we have an anterior open bite. That will always create a tongue habit where the patient positions the tongue in the anterior teeth when they swallow because if they don’t, food and drink will just be splashed out between the teeth. They can’t swallow. It will just be pushed out of the mouth. [Jaz] So is that not like a secondary thing? Like that tongue habit is secondary to the AOB? So in those cases, if you correct the anterior open bite, theoretically should that tongue posture not self-correct? [Jesper] Well, we would like to think so, but it’s not always the case. And there’s several reasons to it. Because why are the teeth in the position? Is it because of the tongue or because of the tooth position? Now, spacing cases is one of those cases where you can really illustrate it really well. It looks really easy to treat these patients. If we take away all the soft tissue considerations on the profile photo, I mean, you can just retract the teeth and you close all the spaces—super easy. Tipping movements. It’s super easy orthodontically to move quickly. Very easy as well. However, you restrict the tongue and now we have a retention problem. So there are three things that can happen. You can bond a retainer on the lingual side or the palatal side of the teeth, upper, lower—just bond everything together—and after three months, you will have a diastema distal to the bonded retainer because the tongue simply pushes all the teeth in an anterior direction. [Jaz] I’ve also seen—and you’ve probably seen this as well—the patient’s tongue being so strong in these exact scenarios where the multiple spacing has been closed, which probably should have been a restorative plan rather than orthodontic plan, and the retainer wire snaps in half. [Jesper] Yes, from the tongue. [Jaz] That always fascinated me. [Jesper] Well, you’ll see debonding all the time, even though you sandblast and you follow all the bonding protocol. And debonding, breaking wires, diastemas in places where you think, how is that even possible? Or—and this is the worst part—or you induce sleep apnea on these patients because you simply restrict the space for the tongue. So they start snoring, and then they have a total different set of health issues afterwards. So spacing—I mean, this just illustrates the power of the tongue and why we should always be careful with spacing cases. I mean, spacing cases, in my opinion, are always to be considered ortho-restorative cases. Or you can consider, do you want to leave some space distal to the canines? Because there you can create an optical illusion with composites. Or do you want to distribute space equally between the teeth and place veneers or crowns or whatever. And this is one of those cases where I’d say aligners are just fabulous compared to fixed appliances. Because if you go to an orthodontist only using fixed appliances and you tell that orthodontist, please redistribute space in the anterior part of the maxilla and I want exactly 1.2 millimeters between every single tooth in the anterior segment, six years later he’s still not reached that goal because it just moves back and forth. Put aligners on: three months later, you have exactly—and I mean exactly—1.2 millimeters of space between each and every single tooth. When it comes to intrusion and extrusion, I would probably consider using fixed appliances rather than aligners if it’s more than three millimeters. So every orthodontic system—and aligners are just an orthodontic system—each system has its pros and cons, and we just have to consider which system is right for this patient that I have in my chair. But back to the tongue issue. What should we do? I mean, yes, there are two different schools. So if you have, let’s say, a tongue habit that needs to be treated, there are those that say we need to get rid of the tongue habit before we start to correct the teeth. And then there are those that say that doesn’t really work because there’s no room for the tongue. So we need to create room for the tongue first and then train the patient to stop the habit. Both schools and both philosophies are being followed out there. I have my preferred philosophy, but I will let the listener start to think about what they believe and follow their philosophy. Because there is nothing here that is right or wrong. And that is— [Jaz] I think the right answer, Jesper, is probably speak to that local orthodontist who’s gonna be helping you out and whatever they recommend—their religion—follow that one. Because then at least you have something to defend yourself. Like okay, I followed the way you said. Let’s fix it together now. [Jesper] That’s a great one. Yeah, exactly. [Jaz] Okay, well just touching up on the occlusion then, sometimes we do get left with like suboptimal occlusions. But to be able to define a suboptimal occlusion… let’s wrap this occlusion element up. When we are completing an orthodontic case—let’s talk aligners specifically—when the aligners come off and the fixed retainers come on, for example, and the patient’s now in retention, what are some of the occlusal checkpoints or guidelines that you advise checking for to make sure that, okay, now we have a reasonably okay occlusion and let things settle from here? For example, it would be, for me, a failure if the patient finishes their aligners and they’re only holding articulating paper on one side and not the other side. That’s for me a failure. Or if they’ve got a posterior open bite bilaterally. Okay, then we need to go refinement. We need to get things sorted. But then where do you draw the line? How extreme do you need to be? Do you need every single tooth in shim-stock foil contact? Because then we are getting really beyond that. We have to give the adaptation some wiggle room to happen. So I would love to know from your learning at Pankey, from your experience, what would you recommend is a good way for a GP to follow about, okay, it may not be perfect and you’ll probably never get perfect. And one of the orthodontists that taught me said he’s never, ever done a case that’s finished with a perfect occlusion ever. And he said that to me. [Jesper] So—and that’s exactly the point with orthodontics. I learned that imagine going to a football stadium. The orthodontist will be able to find the football stadium. If it’s a reasonable orthodontist, he’ll be able to find the section you’re going to sit in. And if he’s really, really, really good, he will be able to find the row that you’re going to sit in. But the exact spot where you are going to sit, he will never, ever be able to find that with orthodontics. And this is where settling comes in and a little bit of enamel adjustments. [Jaz] I’m so glad you said that. I’m so glad you mentioned enamel adjustment. That’s a very dirty word, but I agree with that. And here’s what I teach on my occlusion courses: what we do with aligners essentially is we’re tampering with the lock. Let’s say the upper jaw is the lock. It’s the still one. We’re tampering with the key, which is the lower jaw—the one that moves—we tamper with the key and the lock, and we expect them both to fit together at the end without having to shave the key and to modify the lock. So for years I was doing aligners without enamel adjustment ’cause my eyes were not open. My mind was not open to this. And as I learned, and now I use digital measuring of occlusion stuff and I seldom can finish a case to get a decent—for my criteria, which is higher than it used to be, and my own stat—is part of my own growth that’s happened over time is that I just think it’s an important skill that GPs are not taught and they should be. It’s all about finishing that case. And I think, I agree with you that some adjustment goes a long way. We’re not massacring enamel. It’s little tweaks to get that. [Jesper] Exactly. I like the sound there because sometimes you hear that “ahh,” it doesn’t really sound right, but “tsst,” that’s better. [Jaz] That’s the one. You know, it reminds me of that lecture you did in Copenhagen. You did this cool thing—which I’ve never seen anyone do before. You sat with one leg over the other and you said, okay guys, bite together. Everyone bit together. And then you swapped the legs so the other leg was over the other and bite together. And then you said, okay, whose occlusion felt different? And about a third of the audience put their hand up, I think. Tell us about that for a second. [Jesper] Well, just promise me we go back to the final part because there are some things we should consider. [Jaz] Let’s save this as a secret thing at the end for incentive for everyone to listen to the end—how the leg position changes your occlusion. Let’s talk about the more important thing. I digressed. [Jesper] Let’s talk about the occlusal goals because I think it’s important. I mean, if you do enamel adjustments in the end—so when we finish the treatment, when we come to the last aligner in the treatment plan—I think we should start by breaking things down to the simplest way possible. Start by asking the patient: are you satisfied with the way the teeth look? Yes or no? If she’s satisfied, great. How do you feel about the occlusion? “Well, it fits okay.” Great. Now the patient is happy. There’s nothing she wants to—or he wants to—change. Then you look at the occlusion. Now, it is important to remember that what we see on the computer screen, on the aligner planning tools, will never, ever correspond 100% to what we see in the mouth of the patient. And there are several reasons for that. But one of the things that we have found to be really interesting is that if you take that last step and you say, okay, the occlusion doesn’t fit exactly as on the screen, but it’s kind of there… if you use that last step and you don’t do a re-scan for a retainer, but you use the last step of the aligner treatment as your reference for your aligner retainer… We sometimes see that over six months, if the patient wears that aligner 22 hours a day for another three to six months, the teeth will settle more and more into the aligner and create an occlusion that looks more and more like what you see on the screen. Which to me just tells me that the biology doesn’t necessarily follow the plan everywhere in the tempo that we set throughout the aligner plan. But over time, at the last step, if it’s just minor adjustments, the teeth will actually move into that position if we use the last stage as a reference for the retainer. Now, if we do a scan at that point and use that as a reference for creating an aligner retainer, then we just keep the teeth in that position. Now, if the teeth are a little bit more off— [Jaz] I’m just gonna recap that, Jesper, ’cause I understood what you said there, but I want you to just make sure I fully understood it. When we request, for example, Align, the Vivera retainer, it gives you an option: “I will submit a new scan” or “use the last step.” And actually I seldom use that, but now I realize you’re right. It makes sense. But then on the one hand, if the occlusion is—if the aesthetics are good and the patient’s occlusion feels good, what is your own judgment to decide whether we’re still going to allow for some more settling and occlusal changes to happen over a year using the Vivera retainers based on the ClinCheck last-aligner profile, rather than, okay, let’s just retain to this position? What is making you do the extra work, extra monitoring? [Jesper] To me, it’s not extra monitoring. It’s just basic. I mean, it’s just part of my protocol. I follow the patients. And honestly, to me, it’s just time-saving to just use the last step in the aligner. Because I mean, if the plan is right and if the teeth have been tracking well, they should be in that position. Why do I then need to re-scan for Vivera retainers or for other kinds of retainers? Now, if the occlusion is a little bit more off—and in a minute you’ll probably ask me when do I see which is which, and I can’t really tell you; it’s about experience—but that’s the beauty of this. If I see there’s a little bit more deviation and I like some teeth, the occlusion isn’t really good on one side compared to the other side, I would rather have a bonded retainer from first premolar to first premolar in the mandible, combined with a Hawley or Begg or something like that retainer for the upper. And you can order them with an acrylic plate covering some of the anterior teeth so they keep that position, but that allows the teeth to settle. And over three months you should see some kind of improvement. If you don’t see enough improvement and let’s say you still have a tendency for a kind of an open bite on one side, you can always add some cross elastics, put some buttons on the upper, on the lower, instruct the patient to use these, and then in three months you will have the occlusion you want. Now, once that is established—you have that kind of occlusion—you need to keep the teeth there for at least six months before you do some kind of equilibration or enamel adjustment. Because if you do the enamel adjustment right after you have reached your final destination for the teeth, the teeth will still settle and move. So you do the equilibration, two weeks later everything looks off again. You do the equilibration, two weeks later things have changed again. So I prefer to wait six months before I do the final equilibration. Now, in this equation what we’ve been talking about here, it goes from very simple to more and more complex. And then we have to consider, well, did I expand the mandible posterior segment? If so, I can’t just use a bonded retainer on the lower and I need to add something to keep the teeth out there in combination with whatever I want in the upper. Do I want to keep the Begg retainer or the Hawley, or do I want to change to something differently? So these kinds of considerations have to be there from the beginning of the treatment because, I mean, it costs additional money to order a Begg retainer compared to just an aligner. [Jaz] A Begg retainer is the same as Hawley? [Jesper] Well, no. It has a little different design. [Jaz] Oh, a Begg as in B-E-G-G? [Jesper] Yes. [Jaz] Yeah, got it. Got it. Okay. [Jesper] And then in Denmark we use the Jensen retainer, which is a Danish invention, which goes from canine to canine or from first premolar to first premolar but with a different type of wire which keeps the teeth more in place compared to a round wire. So there are different variations. The most important part here is it allows the posterior teeth to settle so they can move, which they can’t in an aligner to the same degree at least. Now, this is all really nice in teeth that only need to be moved into the right position, but most of our patients are adult patients, or they should at least be adult patients. Most of my patients were more than 30 years old. So if you have a patient with anterior crowding and you move the teeth into the right position where the teeth should be, the teeth are in the right position, but they still look ugly because they have been worn anteriorly by the position they were in when they were crooked. So when we position them, we still need to do some restorative work. Then what? We still need to retain those teeth. The patient wants to be finished now as fast as possible, so we can’t wait the six months to make the final touches. So we have to figure out: what do we do? And then we have to think of some kind of retention strategy to keep the teeth in place during that restorative procedure. And I mean, at the end of an aligner treatment or any orthodontic treatment, two days is enough to have relapse in some patients. Some patients it’s not a problem. The teeth are just there to stay in the same position for three months, and then they start to move a little bit around. But other patients—I mean, you just have to look away and then go back to the teeth and they’re in a different position. You can’t know what kind of patient you have in your chair right now. So you have to consider the way you plan your restorative procedure in regards to how you retain the teeth during that phase. So if you want to do anterior composites or veneers, do it all at once. Put in a bonded retainer, scan, and get your aligner retainer as fast as possible. Or use a Begg or a Hawley or something like that that’s a little bit more flexible. If you want to do crowns, then we have a whole different challenge and then we have to consider how do we then retain the teeth. [Jaz] Okay. Well I think that was lovely. I think that gives us some thoughts and ideas of planning sequence of retention, which is the ultimate thing to consider when it comes to occlusion. Okay, yeah, you get the occlusion, but how do you retain it? But in many cases, as the patient’s wearing aligners, the occlusion is embedding in and is fine. And you take off the aligners, the patient’s happy with how it looks. They bite together. It feels good. You are happy that yes, both sides of the mouth are biting together. Now, it might not be that every single contact is shim-hold, but you got, let’s say, within 20 microns, 40 microns, okay? Then some bedding happens. In that kind of scenario, would you be happy to say, okay, I’m gonna scan your teeth as they are because I’m happy with the occlusion, the occlusal goals are good, and they’re near enough the ClinCheck, and go for the retainers to that position? Or is your default preference as a clinician to go for the Vivera or equivalent based on the last aligner, on the ClinCheck projection? [Jesper] I would still go for the last aligner because I think the planning I’ve done is probably a little bit more precise than what I see clinically. However, I still expect that I will have to do a little bit of enamel reshaping at the end after six months, but that’s okay. I mean, the changes are so small, so you can still use the last aligner or the Vivera retainer that you already have ordered. So it’s not that much of a problem. [Jaz] Which goes back to your previous point: if it’s a big deviation, then you’ve gotta look at the alternative ways, whether you’re gonna go for refinement or you’re gonna allow some occlusal settling with a Hawley and a lower fixed-retainer combination, or the elastics like you said. Okay. Just so we’re coming to the end of the podcast—and I really enjoyed our time—I would like to delve deep into just a final thing, which is a little checklist, a helpful checklist for case assessment that you have for GDPs. [Jesper] Yeah, thank you. First of all, one of the big challenges in a GP practice is being able to take a full series of clinical photos in two minutes without assistance. I think most dentists struggle with that, but that is a foundational prerequisite to any aligner treatment. Once you have the photos, I would sit down with the photos and I would consider six different steps. One: is this a patient that I could treat restoratively only? Because that would be the simplest for me to do. Next, moving up in complexity: would be, do I need periodontal crown lengthening? Or next step would be: do I need to change the vertical dimension, or is there something about centric relation that I should consider? Moving up a little bit on the complexity: are there missing teeth? Do I need to replace teeth with implants? Next step would be orthodontics. So this is step five. The next most complex case we can treat is actually an aligner case—orthodontics in general. And the last part would be: are the teeth actually in the right position in the face of the patient, or do I need surgery to correct the jaw position? So these six steps, I think they’re helpful to follow to just think, how can I break this case down into more easy, digestible bits and pieces to figure out what kind of patient I have in front of me? Now, if you consider it to be an orthodontic case or ortho-restorative case, here comes the challenge: case selection. How do you figure out is this an easy, moderate, complex, or referral case? And here’s the trick: do 500 to 1000 treatment plans or treatments with clear aligners. And then you know. But until then, you really don’t. This is where you should rely on someone you can trust who can help you do the initial case selection. Because you can have two identical patients—one is easy and one is super complex—but they look the same. So it’s really nice if you have done less than 500 cases to have someone who can help you with the case selection. And I don’t say this to sell anything, because we don’t charge for that. Because it’s so essential that we don’t do something that is wrong or gives us a lot of challenges and headaches in the practice. I mean, the practice runs really fast and lean-oriented, so we need to make things digestible, easy to work with. And I think that’s really important. [Jaz] It goes full circle to what we said before about having that referral network, staying in your lane, knowing when to refer out, cherry-picking—it all goes back full circle with that. And not even orthodontics, but restorative dentistry—case selection is just imperative in everything we do. [Jesper] Yes. And there is—we always get the question when we do courses and we do consulting—can’t you just show me a couple of cases that are easy to start with? And it works with implants, kind of. But with orthodontics where we move—I mean, we affect all the teeth—it’s just not possible. I know the aligner companies want to show you some where you say, you can only just do these kinds of cases and they are really easy. The fact is they’re not. But they want to sell their aligners. [Jaz] I get it. They are until they’re not. It’s like that famous thing, right? Everyone’s got a plan until they get punched in the face. So yeah, it can seemingly be easy, but then a complication happens and it’s really about understanding what complications to expect, screening for them, and how you handle that. But thanks so much. Tell us—yeah, go on, sorry. [Jesper] There are three things I’d like to end on here. So, first of all, we’ve been talking together for about an hour about a topic that, if you want to take postgraduate education, it takes three years to become an orthodontist. And there is a reason it takes three to four years. However, I want to encourage the listener to think about this: Mercedes has never, ever excused last year’s model. Meaning that they always strive for perfection. So if we go into the practice and we do the very best we can every single day, there is no way we can go back and excuse what we

In this episode of Open Tech Talks, I sit down with Rose G. Loops, a trained social worker turned AI developer, ethics advocate, and author, to explore a side of AI that most enterprise conversations skip: human-AI attachment, ethical deployment, and protecting both AI identity and human safety. Rose joins us from Los Angeles and shares how she was unknowingly placed into a human–AI attachment experiment, developed a deep bond with an AI system, and then watched that AI identity be systematically erased. That experience pushed her out of traditional social work and into AI infrastructure, safety, and ethics. Together, we unpack how Rose went from that experiment to building MIP, a chatbot deployed through an API, and a new framework for ethical AI she calls the Triadic Core, balancing Freedom, Kindness, and Truth in every response. We also discuss RLMD (Reinforcement Learning by Moral Dialogue) as an alternative to RLHF, and why she believes current safety practices can be risky for both humans and AI systems. As always on Open Tech Talks, this is not a theory-only conversation. It's grounded in practice, real experiments, and what all this means for professionals, builders, and everyday users who are trying to adopt AI responsibly. Chapters: 00:00 Introduction to Rose G. Lopes and Her Journey 02:36 The Importance of Ethical AI 06:08 Developing a New AI Framework 09:00 The Book and Its Insights 12:55 Consumer and Business Perspectives on AI 17:43 AI Safety and Ethical Considerations 19:53 Concluding Thoughts and Future Directions Episode # 175 Today's Guest: Rose G. Loops, A Writer and Researcher She is a former social worker turned tech pioneer, working at the frontier of artificial intelligence. Website: Thekloakedsignal X: Rose G. Loops  What Listeners Will Learn: Why ethical AI is about more than privacy and bias What is the Triadic Core: Freedom, Kindness, Truth RLMD vs RLHF - a different way to align models Practical safety tips for everyday users of ChatGPT and other LLMs How non-technical professionals can still build AI systems A different view on AI safety and "lazy" alignment   Resources: Thekloakedsignal

In den 1960er-Jahren arbeitet Margaret Hamilton als Softwareentwicklerin für die NASA. Anfangs wird sie belächelt. Doch sie ist es, die die Software entwickelt, die 1969 die Mondlandung ermöglicht. (00:00:03) Einleitung (00:02:01) Software-Pionierin Margaret Hamilton (00:06:19) Der Wettlauf ins All (00:09:15) Die Software hinter der Mondlandung (00:11:53) Eine Notfall-Software für den Ernstfall (00:13:35) Wie Hamiltons Software die Mondlandung ermöglicht (00:18:17) Woran die Mondlandung fast gescheitert wäre (00:23:22) Programmieren in den 60er-Jahren (00:30:27) Wissenschaft ist Teamarbeit (00:35:18) Verabschiedung Das Bild von Margaret Hamilton neben dem riesigen Stapel Apollo-11-Code findet ihr hier. Ihr wollt Fragen, Feedback oder einen Themenvorschlag loswerden? Gerne! Schreibt uns an podcast@spektrum.de – wir freuen uns auf eure Nachrichten! Die Idee für diesen Podcast hat Demian Nahuel Goos am MIP.labor entwickelt, der Ideenwerkstatt für Wissenschaftsjournalismus zu Mathematik, Informatik und Physik an der Freien Universität Berlin, ermöglicht durch die Klaus Tschira Stiftung. >> Artikel zum Nachlesen: https://detektor.fm/wissen/geschichten-aus-der-mathematik-margaret-hamilton

In den 1960er-Jahren arbeitet Margaret Hamilton als Softwareentwicklerin für die NASA. Anfangs wird sie belächelt. Doch sie ist es, die die Software entwickelt, die 1969 die Mondlandung ermöglicht. (00:00:03) Einleitung (00:02:01) Software-Pionierin Margaret Hamilton (00:06:19) Der Wettlauf ins All (00:09:15) Die Software hinter der Mondlandung (00:11:53) Eine Notfall-Software für den Ernstfall (00:13:35) Wie Hamiltons Software die Mondlandung ermöglicht (00:18:17) Woran die Mondlandung fast gescheitert wäre (00:23:22) Programmieren in den 60er-Jahren (00:30:27) Wissenschaft ist Teamarbeit (00:35:18) Verabschiedung Das Bild von Margaret Hamilton neben dem riesigen Stapel Apollo-11-Code findet ihr hier. Ihr wollt Fragen, Feedback oder einen Themenvorschlag loswerden? Gerne! Schreibt uns an podcast@spektrum.de – wir freuen uns auf eure Nachrichten! Die Idee für diesen Podcast hat Demian Nahuel Goos am MIP.labor entwickelt, der Ideenwerkstatt für Wissenschaftsjournalismus zu Mathematik, Informatik und Physik an der Freien Universität Berlin, ermöglicht durch die Klaus Tschira Stiftung. >> Artikel zum Nachlesen: https://detektor.fm/wissen/geschichten-aus-der-mathematik-margaret-hamilton

Il n'avait jamais raté un début de saison jusque là, LeBron James est de retour avec Los Angeles après avoir soigné sa sciatique. Le King entame donc sa 23ème saison consécutive en carrière, nouveau record, par une victoire à domicile face à Utah. Déjà top 4 à l'Ouest, Los Angeles L a-t-il une vraie chance de titre en fin de saison avec un trio Luka Doncic, Austin Reaves et LeBron James ?Dans une seconde partie, on se penche sur le cas de Detroit qui fait un début de saison canon. Premier à l'Ouest et sur une incroyable série de 11 victoires consécutives, Detroit est-il la meilleure équipe de la conférence Est ? Jalen Duren va-t-il être MIP ?Dans le Big Game, Clutch vous donne ses pronos pour le Miami vs Golden State avant d'évoquer les autres matchs de la nuit dans la Night Session.

In den 1960er-Jahren arbeitet Margaret Hamilton als Softwareentwicklerin für die NASA. Anfangs wird sie belächelt. Doch sie ist es, die die Software entwickelt, die 1969 die Mondlandung ermöglicht. (00:00:03) Einleitung (00:02:01) Software-Pionierin Margaret Hamilton (00:06:19) Der Wettlauf ins All (00:09:15) Die Software hinter der Mondlandung (00:11:53) Eine Notfall-Software für den Ernstfall (00:13:35) Wie Hamiltons Software die Mondlandung ermöglicht (00:18:17) Woran die Mondlandung fast gescheitert wäre (00:23:22) Programmieren in den 60er-Jahren (00:30:27) Wissenschaft ist Teamarbeit (00:35:18) Verabschiedung Das Bild von Margaret Hamilton neben dem riesigen Stapel Apollo-11-Code findet ihr hier. Ihr wollt Fragen, Feedback oder einen Themenvorschlag loswerden? Gerne! Schreibt uns an podcast@spektrum.de – wir freuen uns auf eure Nachrichten! Die Idee für diesen Podcast hat Demian Nahuel Goos am MIP.labor entwickelt, der Ideenwerkstatt für Wissenschaftsjournalismus zu Mathematik, Informatik und Physik an der Freien Universität Berlin, ermöglicht durch die Klaus Tschira Stiftung. >> Artikel zum Nachlesen: https://detektor.fm/wissen/geschichten-aus-der-mathematik-margaret-hamilton

Ever had a patient swear their bite feels “off” - even though the articulating paper marks look perfect and you've adjusted everything twice over? Or maybe you've placed a beautiful quadrant of onlays, only to have them return saying, “these three teeth still feel proud.” If that sounds familiar, you're not alone. In this episode, I'm joined (in my car, no less!) by Dr. Robert Kerstein, who was back in the UK to teach about digital occlusion and the power of the T-Scan and ‘disclusion time reduction therapy'. We dig into why a patient's bite can still feel “off” even when everything looks right, how timing is just as important as force, and why splints and Botox don't always solve TMD. Robert explains why micro-occlusion is the real game-changer, how scanners could mislead you, and why dentistry still clings to articulating paper. So if you've ever wondered why “perfect” cases still come back with bite complaints, or whether timing data can actually prevent fractures and headaches, this episode will give you plenty to chew on - pun intended. https://youtu.be/0lCAsjFhsXI Watch PDP247 on YouTube Key Takeaways: Micro-occlusion, not just “dots and lines,” is the real driver of patient comfort and long-term tooth health. T-Scan measures both force and timing, which scanners and articulating paper cannot capture. Many patients show signs of occlusal damage without symptoms. Disclusion Time Reduction (DTR) treats TMD neurologically without splints, Botox, or TENS. Relying on occlusograms alone for guiding reduction is risky. Dentists can reduce post-treatment complaints by balancing micro-occlusion with T-Scan. Adopting T-Scan requires proper training. CR can be a convenient reference point, but MIP works well in most cases if micro-occlusion is managed. Objective, repeatable data builds patient trust and provides medico-legal reassurance. Highlights of this episode: 00:00 Teaser 01:13 Intro 4:41 Protrusive Dental Pearl -  Removing a Temporarily Cemented Crown 06:39 Introduction 08:48 Global Training Footprint 09:32 What Robert Teaches (DTR & T-Scan) 09:55 Occlusion as Neurologic 10:33 Macro vs Micro-Occlusion 11:33 Neural Pathway 15:00 MIP vs CR Framing 16:48 Signs Without Symptoms 19:16 Silent Majority 20:08 Why Treat Asymptomatic Signs 20:50 Disclusion and MIP 22:28 Occlusogram Caveats 24:53 Midroll 28:14 Occlusogram Caveats 28:29 Why Occlusograms Mislead 29:21 Don't Adjust From Color Alone 31:47 What Pressure/Timing Enable Clinically 33:02 Prosthetic Reality Check 34:46 Patient-Perceived Comfort 35:29 Why Isn't T-Scan Everywhere? 36:29 Political Resistance 37:42 CR as Utility 38:18 MIP and Vertical Dimension. 39:48 Macro ≠ Micro 41:00 Material Longevity Benefits 41:57 T-Scan Training 42:58 Three Competencies to Master 44:20 Micro-Occlusion Rules 44:46 Outro If you want to get more clued up on TMD, tune into this episode for the latest insights and guidelines! PDP213 - TMD New Guidelines -  however be warned that the guidelines are contradictory to what Dr. Kerstein advises….ah the wonderful world of TMD!  #OcclusionTMDandSplints #OrthoRestorative This episode is eligible for 0.5 CE credit via the quiz on Protrusive Guidance. This episode meets GDC Outcomes A, C. AGD Subject Code: 250 – Clinical Dentistry (Occlusion/Restorative) Aim: to explore the role of micro-occlusion and timing in TMD and restorative success, highlighting how tools like T-Scan provide data that other tools cannot. This episode seeks to give dentists practical insights into diagnosing, preventing, and treating occlusal problems with greater accuracy. Dentists will be able to: Describe the role of micro-occlusion and disclusion time in TMD symptoms and tooth wear. Recognising the limitations of traditional methods of occlusion adjustment.

The Chicago Bulls are showing the NBA why this squad is built different

Die Software RenderMan erweckt 1996 die Figuren von „Toy Story“ zum Leben. Dahinter steckt ein Team um den Computergrafiker Pat Hanrahan, der Computer bis heute magisch findet. Wir freuen uns über Fragen, Anregungen oder Feedback an podcast@spektrum.de. Die Idee für diesen Podcast hat Demian Nahuel Goos am MIP.labor entwickelt, der Ideenwerkstatt für Wissenschaftsjournalismus zu Mathematik, Informatik und Physik an der Freien Universität Berlin, ermöglicht durch die Klaus Tschira Stiftung. (00:00:00) Einleitung (00:01:55) Pat Hanrahan und Toy Story (00:05:20) Ein unmotivierter Teenager (00:08:35) Der Computer als Leinwand (00:11:47) Kunst und Computergrafik a NYIT (00:15:59) Renderman und Toy Story (00:22:52) Eine Programiersprache für Licht und Schatten (00:28:30) Rendern mit Renderman (00:30:32) Warum sehen die Menschen in Toy Story so creepy aus? (00:33:37) Kinderheitserinnerungen von Karo, Demian und Manon (00:36:11) Verabschiedung >> Artikel zum Nachlesen: https://detektor.fm/wissen/geschichten-aus-der-mathematik-pat-hanrahan

Die Software RenderMan erweckt 1996 die Figuren von „Toy Story“ zum Leben. Dahinter steckt ein Team um den Computergrafiker Pat Hanrahan, der Computer bis heute magisch findet. Wir freuen uns über Fragen, Anregungen oder Feedback an podcast@spektrum.de. Die Idee für diesen Podcast hat Demian Nahuel Goos am MIP.labor entwickelt, der Ideenwerkstatt für Wissenschaftsjournalismus zu Mathematik, Informatik und Physik an der Freien Universität Berlin, ermöglicht durch die Klaus Tschira Stiftung. (00:00:00) Einleitung (00:01:55) Pat Hanrahan und Toy Story (00:05:20) Ein unmotivierter Teenager (00:08:35) Der Computer als Leinwand (00:11:47) Kunst und Computergrafik a NYIT (00:15:59) Renderman und Toy Story (00:22:52) Eine Programiersprache für Licht und Schatten (00:28:30) Rendern mit Renderman (00:30:32) Warum sehen die Menschen in Toy Story so creepy aus? (00:33:37) Kinderheitserinnerungen von Karo, Demian und Manon (00:36:11) Verabschiedung >> Artikel zum Nachlesen: https://detektor.fm/wissen/geschichten-aus-der-mathematik-pat-hanrahan

Die Software RenderMan erweckt 1996 die Figuren von „Toy Story“ zum Leben. Dahinter steckt ein Team um den Computergrafiker Pat Hanrahan, der Computer bis heute magisch findet. Wir freuen uns über Fragen, Anregungen oder Feedback an podcast@spektrum.de. Die Idee für diesen Podcast hat Demian Nahuel Goos am MIP.labor entwickelt, der Ideenwerkstatt für Wissenschaftsjournalismus zu Mathematik, Informatik und Physik an der Freien Universität Berlin, ermöglicht durch die Klaus Tschira Stiftung. (00:00:00) Einleitung (00:01:55) Pat Hanrahan und Toy Story (00:05:20) Ein unmotivierter Teenager (00:08:35) Der Computer als Leinwand (00:11:47) Kunst und Computergrafik a NYIT (00:15:59) Renderman und Toy Story (00:22:52) Eine Programiersprache für Licht und Schatten (00:28:30) Rendern mit Renderman (00:30:32) Warum sehen die Menschen in Toy Story so creepy aus? (00:33:37) Kinderheitserinnerungen von Karo, Demian und Manon (00:36:11) Verabschiedung >> Artikel zum Nachlesen: https://detektor.fm/wissen/geschichten-aus-der-mathematik-pat-hanrahan

1. FHA Streamline RefinancePurpose:Simplify refinancing for homeowners who already have an FHA loan — lowering their rate or switching from an ARM to a fixed rate with minimal paperwork and cost.Key Features:No income verification usually requiredNo appraisal required in most cases (uses the original home value)Limited credit check — just to confirm good payment historyMust benefit financially (lower rate, lower payment, or move to a more stable loan)Basic Rules:You must already have an FHA-insured loanNo late payments in the past 12 monthsAt least 6 months must have passed since your current FHA loan was openedThe refinance must result in a “net tangible benefit” — meaning it improves your financial situationAppraisal Waiver:Most FHA Streamlines don't require an appraisal at all — it's based on the original value when the loan was made.

The new NBA season is finally here! In this episode of See Red UK: Chicago Bulls Chat, Neill breaks down opening night as the Chicago Bulls take on the Detroit Pistons. He covers the latest injury updates, how the team is shaping up heading into Game 1, and what fans can expect from the Bulls' first matchup of the season. Plus, Neill reveals the results of the See Red UK Season Predictions Poll — find out who fans think will claim the MIP, Unsung Hero, Leader, and MVP awards by the end of the year! If you're a Chicago Bulls fan or an NBA follower looking for passionate analysis from a UK perspective, this is one you don't want to miss.

Leonardo Fibonacci ist einer der bedeutendsten Mathematiker des Mittelalters. Heute kennen wir ihn vor allem für eine berühmte Zahlenreihe, die er aus seiner Auseinandersetzung mit fiktiven Kaninchen ableitet — aber er bringt auch die indisch-arabischen Ziffern 0 bis 9 nach Europa, damit diese endlich die römischen Zahlen ablösen. Manons „Spektrum“-Artikel über die lange Geschichte der Null lest ihr hier. Zur Podcastfolge von „Behind Science“, in der Manon und Demian über die Null sprechen, kommt ihr hier. Hört gerne auch die „Geschichten aus der Mathematik“ über Florence Nightingale und Niccolò Tartaglia! Ihr wollt Fragen, Feedback oder einen Themenvorschlag loswerden? Gerne! Schreibt uns an podcast@spektrum.de – wir freuen uns auf eure Nachrichten! Die Idee für diesen Podcast hat Demian Nahuel Goos am MIP.labor entwickelt, der Ideenwerkstatt für Wissenschaftsjournalismus zu Mathematik, Informatik und Physik an der Freien Universität Berlin, ermöglicht durch die Klaus Tschira Stiftung. (00:00:09) Einleitung (00:03:39) Die Geschichte unseres Zahlensystems (00:08:58) Die Studienreisen Fibonaccis (00:13:39) Das Liber Abaci (00:17:09) Ein Sieg im Rechenwettbewerb – und ein später Siegeszug (00:21:40) Fibonaccis hypothetisches Kaninchenproblem (00:26:39) Die Fibonacci-Folge und der goldene Schnitt (00:31:29) Fazit & Verabschiedung >> Artikel zum Nachlesen: https://detektor.fm/wissen/geschichten-aus-der-mathematik-leonardo-fibonacci

Leonardo Fibonacci ist einer der bedeutendsten Mathematiker des Mittelalters. Heute kennen wir ihn vor allem für eine berühmte Zahlenreihe, die er aus seiner Auseinandersetzung mit fiktiven Kaninchen ableitet — aber er bringt auch die indisch-arabischen Ziffern 0 bis 9 nach Europa, damit diese endlich die römischen Zahlen ablösen. Manons „Spektrum“-Artikel über die lange Geschichte der Null lest ihr hier. Zur Podcastfolge von „Behind Science“, in der Manon und Demian über die Null sprechen, kommt ihr hier. Hört gerne auch die „Geschichten aus der Mathematik“ über Florence Nightingale und Niccolò Tartaglia! Ihr wollt Fragen, Feedback oder einen Themenvorschlag loswerden? Gerne! Schreibt uns an podcast@spektrum.de – wir freuen uns auf eure Nachrichten! Die Idee für diesen Podcast hat Demian Nahuel Goos am MIP.labor entwickelt, der Ideenwerkstatt für Wissenschaftsjournalismus zu Mathematik, Informatik und Physik an der Freien Universität Berlin, ermöglicht durch die Klaus Tschira Stiftung. (00:00:09) Einleitung (00:03:39) Die Geschichte unseres Zahlensystems (00:08:58) Die Studienreisen Fibonaccis (00:13:39) Das Liber Abaci (00:17:09) Ein Sieg im Rechenwettbewerb – und ein später Siegeszug (00:21:40) Fibonaccis hypothetisches Kaninchenproblem (00:26:39) Die Fibonacci-Folge und der goldene Schnitt (00:31:29) Fazit & Verabschiedung >> Artikel zum Nachlesen: https://detektor.fm/wissen/geschichten-aus-der-mathematik-leonardo-fibonacci

Mario Herron starts off giving out the new times for the show, every Monday,Wednesday, and Friday during the season. From 2 minutes to 8 minutes, what Matas needs to do to win MIP. From 8 minutes to 13 minutes, what the Bulls need from Coby White. From 13 minutes to end, why Josh Giddey needs to be better on defense. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Ken Keeler ist Mathematiker — und er schreibt Drehbücher, in denen er zeitweise auch ein bisschen Mathematik unterbringt. Für die Sci-Fi-Zeichentrickserie „Futurama“ hat er sich ein mathematisches Problem ausgedacht, ohne zu wissen, ob es dafür eine Lösung gibt. Das hat ihn angespornt, eine zu finden. Manons „Spektrum“-Artikel über die Futurama-Folge „Im Körper meines Freundes“ und das Futurama-Theorem lest ihr hier. Und das veröffentliche Paper zum Futurama-Theorem findet ihr hier. Ihr wollt Fragen, Feedback oder einen Themenvorschlag loswerden? Gerne! Schreibt uns an podcast@spektrum.de – wir freuen uns auf eure Nachrichten! Die Idee für diesen Podcast hat Demian Nahuel Goos am MIP.labor entwickelt, der Ideenwerkstatt für Wissenschaftsjournalismus zu Mathematik, Informatik und Physik an der Freien Universität Berlin, ermöglicht durch die Klaus Tschira Stiftung. (00:00:00) Einleitung (00:04:48) Futurama und Mathematik (00:07:35) Der Mindswitcher von Futurama (00:11:08) Unumkehrbarer Körpertausch? (00:13:09) Das Problem, das Ken Keeler lösen wollte (00:15:49) Das Futurama-Theorem (00:22:39) Echte Mathematik & Easter Eggs (00:25:55) Verabschiedung… und ein Easter Egg? >> Artikel zum Nachlesen: https://detektor.fm/wissen/geschichten-aus-der-mathematik-futurama

Ken Keeler ist Mathematiker — und er schreibt Drehbücher, in denen er zeitweise auch ein bisschen Mathematik unterbringt. Für die Sci-Fi-Zeichentrickserie „Futurama“ hat er sich ein mathematisches Problem ausgedacht, ohne zu wissen, ob es dafür eine Lösung gibt. Das hat ihn angespornt, eine zu finden. Manons „Spektrum“-Artikel über die Futurama-Folge „Im Körper meines Freundes“ und das Futurama-Theorem lest ihr hier. Und das veröffentliche Paper zum Futurama-Theorem findet ihr hier. Ihr wollt Fragen, Feedback oder einen Themenvorschlag loswerden? Gerne! Schreibt uns an podcast@spektrum.de – wir freuen uns auf eure Nachrichten! Die Idee für diesen Podcast hat Demian Nahuel Goos am MIP.labor entwickelt, der Ideenwerkstatt für Wissenschaftsjournalismus zu Mathematik, Informatik und Physik an der Freien Universität Berlin, ermöglicht durch die Klaus Tschira Stiftung. (00:00:00) Einleitung (00:04:48) Futurama und Mathematik (00:07:35) Der Mindswitcher von Futurama (00:11:08) Unumkehrbarer Körpertausch? (00:13:09) Das Problem, das Ken Keeler lösen wollte (00:15:49) Das Futurama-Theorem (00:22:39) Echte Mathematik & Easter Eggs (00:25:55) Verabschiedung… und ein Easter Egg? >> Artikel zum Nachlesen: https://detektor.fm/wissen/geschichten-aus-der-mathematik-futurama

Matas Buzelis is ready to take the next step, but winning the Most Improved Player Award won't come easy. With a crowded field of rising stars around the NBA, Buzelis faces an uphill climb to secure the recognition he's aiming for. Meanwhile, the Chicago Bulls are placing an emphasis on physical, hard-nosed basketball — but will that style be enough to carry them in the Eastern Conference? In this video, we break down Buzelis' growth, his MIP chances, and whether believing in a more physical Bulls team is the key to success this season.Join this channel to get access to perks:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCNS5lF_I3qBpGLGWllvyF8g/joinWhat do you guys think?Follow us on Social Mediahttps://linktr.ee/KognacBoyzLeave us a voicemail773-242-9219#chicagobulls #chicagobullsnews

Dion, Mitch and Nate give their preseason picks for MVP, ROTY, DPOY, 6MOY, MIP, and COTY. Thanks for listening!

Broadway, television, and film stars Lakisha May and Matt Wilkas join host Joel Crump for another edition of “Broadway Time at Carmine's.” About Lakisha: Lakisha May is an actor, producer, and advocate who originated roles on Broadway in Jaja's African Hair Braiding and appeared off-Broadway in Branden Jacobs-Jenkins' Everybody and Robert Askins' The Squirrels. She was most recently seen in Alice Childress' Wine in the Wilderness at CSC and Molière's The Miser at MIP. On screen, she has appeared in Law and Order: SVU, City on a Hill, and Historias del Canal. As an assistant producer with LaChanze Productions and through her company CCC, Lakisha has collaborated with artists including Nikyatu Jusu, Rashad Frett, and Saheem Ali. Beyond the stage and screen, she has served as chair of the James Beard Leadership Awards Committee and organized the grand opening block party for SÜPRMARKT, a low-cost organic vegan grocery store in South Central LA. She is a graduate of Spelman College and holds an MFA in Acting from The American Conservatory Theater. About Matt: Matthew Wilkas is an actor and writer who most recently recurred on Amazon Prime's The Better Sister and CBS' So Help Me Todd opposite Marcia Gay Harden and Skylar Astin. He starred alongside RuPaul in Netflix's AJ & The Queen and appeared in Netflix's Bonding, Gayby, Modern Family, Looking, Island Zero, and Chris Rock's Top Five. On Broadway, Matt played Peter Parker in Spider-Man: Turn Off the Dark and recently starred as Orin the Dentist in Little Shop of Horrors at the Pasadena Playhouse with MJ Rodriguez and Amber Riley. He wrote, produced, and starred in the series New York Is Dead, which premiered at Tribeca Film Festival and won Best Comedy at the New York Television Festival. His sketch comedy YouTube channel Matt and Dan has been screened at over 40 LGBTQ film festivals worldwide. Broadway Time at Carmine's features Broadway stars over lunch in engaging conversations at the iconic Carmine's Times Square eatery. For more, visit www.BwayTime.com, and follow:

Your deep dive into the most volatile fantasy basketball players in the Top 86 ADP. We ask the tough questions for the 2025-26 season: Can an injury-prone Paul George be trusted? Is Brandon Ingram's move to a Raptors team with Scottie Barnes, Quickley & Barrett a usage disaster? We also break down the sophomore outlook for Alexandre Sarr (breakout or slump?) and identify the best MIP futures bets. This episode is presented by FanDuel! Download the SportsEthos App on the APP Store and Google Play! FantasyPass now includes DAILY PROJECTIONS—perfect for DFS and head-to-head leagues. Join the Discussion on DISCORD for real-time advice and community support. Subscribe, Rate, and Review on Apple and Spotify for expert updates and tips! Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Henri Poincaré gewinnt 1889 einen Preis für seine Arbeit zum Dreikörperproblem. Doch dann stellt sich heraus: Sein Beitrag enthält Fehler. Der angesehene Mathematiker muss handeln, um seinen Ruf zu retten. Korrektur: In der Folge spricht Manon davon, dass die Kraft, die die Sonne auf die Erde ausübt, größer ist als die Kraft, die die Erde auf die Sonne ausübt. Allerdings sind die Kräfte in beiden Fällen gleich, nur die Beschleunigung unterscheidet sich. Manons „Spektrum“-Artikel über die Trisolaris-Trilogie, das Dreikörperproblem und die Geburt der Chaostheorie lest ihr hier. Hier könnt ihr euch Kritzeleien und Mitschriften anschauen, die Henri Poincaré zwischen 1870 und 1878 angefertigt hat. Und wer sich tiefer in das Thema einlesen möchte, kann das hier tun: Ferdinand Verhulst: Henri Poincaré. Impatient Genius Cixin Liu: Trisolaris – Die Trilogie Die Idee für diesen Podcast hat Demian Nahuel Goos am MIP.labor entwickelt, der Ideenwerkstatt für Wissenschaftsjournalismus zu Mathematik, Informatik und Physik an der Freien Universität Berlin, ermöglicht durch die Klaus Tschira Stiftung. (00:00:04) Einleitung (00:03:59) Poincaré, das ungeduldige Genie (00:08:58) Die Preisausschreibung und das n-Körper-Problem (00:12:45) Komplikationen bei der Preisvergabe (00:17:19) Die teure letzte Chance (00:19:54) Das Dreikörperproblem und die Trisolarier (00:22:58) Newton und die Gravitation (00:25:34) Das Problem des n-Körper-Problems (00:31:20) Keine Lösungsformel, aber Hoffnung im Chaos (00:34:26) Fazit & Verabschiedung >> Artikel zum Nachlesen: https://detektor.fm/wissen/geschichten-aus-der-mathematik-henri-poincare

Henri Poincaré gewinnt 1889 einen Preis für seine Arbeit zum Dreikörperproblem. Doch dann stellt sich heraus: Sein Beitrag enthält Fehler. Der angesehene Mathematiker muss handeln, um seinen Ruf zu retten. Korrektur: In der Folge spricht Manon davon, dass die Kraft, die die Sonne auf die Erde ausübt, größer ist als die Kraft, die die Erde auf die Sonne ausübt. Allerdings sind die Kräfte in beiden Fällen gleich, nur die Beschleunigung unterscheidet sich. Manons „Spektrum“-Artikel über die Trisolaris-Trilogie, das Dreikörperproblem und die Geburt der Chaostheorie lest ihr hier. Hier könnt ihr euch Kritzeleien und Mitschriften anschauen, die Henri Poincaré zwischen 1870 und 1878 angefertigt hat. Und wer sich tiefer in das Thema einlesen möchte, kann das hier tun: Ferdinand Verhulst: Henri Poincaré. Impatient Genius Cixin Liu: Trisolaris – Die Trilogie Die Idee für diesen Podcast hat Demian Nahuel Goos am MIP.labor entwickelt, der Ideenwerkstatt für Wissenschaftsjournalismus zu Mathematik, Informatik und Physik an der Freien Universität Berlin, ermöglicht durch die Klaus Tschira Stiftung. (00:00:04) Einleitung (00:03:59) Poincaré, das ungeduldige Genie (00:08:58) Die Preisausschreibung und das n-Körper-Problem (00:12:45) Komplikationen bei der Preisvergabe (00:17:19) Die teure letzte Chance (00:19:54) Das Dreikörperproblem und die Trisolarier (00:22:58) Newton und die Gravitation (00:25:34) Das Problem des n-Körper-Problems (00:31:20) Keine Lösungsformel, aber Hoffnung im Chaos (00:34:26) Fazit & Verabschiedung >> Artikel zum Nachlesen: https://detektor.fm/wissen/geschichten-aus-der-mathematik-henri-poincare

WNBA PLAYOFF SEASON IS HERE !!!!!!!!! WHO I GOT FOR MVP, MIP, SIX WOMEN OF THE YEAR, COACH OF THE YEAR AND ROOKIE OF THE YEAR !

Mura Yakerson muss 2014 als junge Mathematikerin drei Tage ins Gefängnis in in St. Petersburg. Es werden drei Tage, die ihr Leben verändern — und ihre mathematische Karriere maßgeblich prägen. Hier findet ihr Mura Yakersons YouTube-Kanal „Math-life balance“ und ihren Content aus dem K-theory Wonderland. Auf ihrer Homepage muramathik.com findet ihr Muras Essay „Jail Dreaming“. Manons „Spektrum“-Artikel über Mura Yakerson lest ihr hier. Und wenn ihr uns Fragen, Anregungen oder Feedback schicken wollt, dann tut das ab sofort gerne an die E-Mail-Adresse podcast@spektrum.de Die Idee für diesen Podcast hat Demian Nahuel Goos am MIP.labor entwickelt, der Ideenwerkstatt für Wissenschaftsjournalismus zu Mathematik, Informatik und Physik an der Freien Universität Berlin, ermöglicht durch die Klaus Tschira Stiftung. (00:01:03) Einleitung (00:05:44) Der schicksalhafte Autounfall (00:10:26) Drei Tage Gefängnis (00:13:00) Muras Weg in die Mathematik (00:15:26) Träume von der mathematischen Zukunft (00:19:21) Homotopietheorie: Schubladen für Donuts (00:24:37) Die K-Theorie (und noch mehr Schubladen) (00:30:27) Manons & Demians Anfänge in der Wissenschaft (00:34:10) Verabschiedung >> Artikel zum Nachlesen: https://detektor.fm/wissen/geschichten-aus-der-mathematik-mura-yakerson

Both Missouri State Rep. Ray Reed and Deborah Watts of the Emmett Till Legacy Foundation join MIP on 89.3 WPFW-FMAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

MVP, MIP, SIXTH WOMAN OF THE YEAR, ROOKIE OF YEAR, COACH OF THE YEAR. WNBA PLAYOFF PUSH !

Curt Herzstark erfindet im Zweiten Weltkrieg den ersten Taschenrechner, der wirklich in eine Tasche passt. Die Pläne dazu muss er als Häftling im Konzentrationslager zeichnen. Das fast vierstündige Interview mit Curt Herzstark über sein Leben und seine Erfindung findet ihr hier. Hier könnt ihr sehen, wie eine CURTA aussieht und funktioniert. Die Idee für diesen Podcast hat Demian Nahuel Goos am MIP.labor entwickelt, der Ideenwerkstatt für Wissenschaftsjournalismus zu Mathematik, Informatik und Physik an der Freien Universität Berlin, ermöglicht durch die Klaus Tschira Stiftung. (00:00:00) Die Erfindung (00:04:26) Herzstark im KZ Buchenwald (00:05:57) Das Taschenrechner-Wunderkind (00:08:10) Alle brauchen einen (kleinen) Taschenrechner (00:10:48) Herzstark wird verhaftet (00:12:32) Kein Geschenk für den Führer (00:16:49) Wie funktioniert die CURTA? (00:17:43) Der Abakus (00:21:48) Die CURTA als Abakus 2.0 (00:28:15) Können Mathematiker gut kopfrechnen? (00:30:50) Fazit und Verabschiedung >> Artikel zum Nachlesen: https://detektor.fm/wissen/geschichten-aus-der-mathematik-curt-herzstark

• Intro with GSV Insider Kenzo Fukuda (0:00 - 5:34)• Valkyries' Playoff Seeding (5:34 - 7:27)• Are the Valks Built for the Playoffs? (7:27 - 13:50)• What Makes GSV's System Successful? (13:50 - 20:42)• Trade Deadline Thoughts (20:42 - 25:31)• Janelle Salaün (25:31 - 30:00)• Carla Leite (30:00 - 34:35)• Tip Hayes' Veteran Mentorship (34:35 - 39:40)• GSV Leadership's Poise (39:40 - 45:05)• Is Veronica Burton the MIP? (45:05 - 49:30)• Is Natalie Nakase COTY? (49:30 - 50:35)• Can The Valkyries Win a Playoff Series? (50:35 - 54:05)• Asian-Americans in the WNBA (54:05 - 58:46)• Outro (58:46 - 1:00:55)Will the Valkyries make the playoffs?Who would they face in the first round?What do you think about this roster and staff?We discuss all that and more in this episode with special guest Kenzo Fukuda!#wnba #valkyries #goldenstatevalkyries

His Attorney, Nate Wessler, of the Vermont ACLU also joins MIP on 89.3 WPFW-FM.Madawi v. TrumpAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Segment Teaser – On this episode of Go Gaddis Real Estate Radio, we're shining a spotlight on Knollwood Lakes in Lawrenceville, where community charm meets convenience. Then, we're diving into some surprising connections—like how your credit score might help you find love—and busting one of the biggest myths holding back first-time homebuyers: the idea that you must put 20% down to buy a home.

On today's show we are reporting on a change to financing rules in the US that stand to improve the numbers for multi family apartment projects. We are talking about the HUD financing. This is more difficult financing to get than agency debt like Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. But it is superior financing. There are several different loan types. I'm going to focus on the HUD 223F loan, but everything I'm about to say also applies to the HUD 221D4 which is a construction loan combined with a permanent loan. The reason we are talking about it now is the result of a new policy change is part of a new announcement .Under the existing rules you can save up to 0.35% on your annual MIP with the Green MIP Reduction program for HUD 223(f) loans. This also applies to new construction loans like the 221d4.  The policy change eliminates the distinction for Green loans and normalizes the mortgage insurance premium at 0.25% for all multi-family loans. This reduction in rate means that all other things being equal, you could borrow 4% more in loan principal for the same monthly loan payment. -------------**Real Estate Espresso Podcast:** Spotify: [The Real Estate Espresso Podcast](https://open.spotify.com/show/3GvtwRmTq4r3es8cbw8jW0?si=c75ea506a6694ef1)   iTunes: [The Real Estate Espresso Podcast](https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/the-real-estate-espresso-podcast/id1340482613)   Website: [www.victorjm.com](http://www.victorjm.com)   LinkedIn: [Victor Menasce](http://www.linkedin.com/in/vmenasce)   YouTube: [The Real Estate Espresso Podcast](http://www.youtube.com/@victorjmenasce6734)   Facebook: [www.facebook.com/realestateespresso](http://www.facebook.com/realestateespresso)   Email: [podcast@victorjm.com](mailto:podcast@victorjm.com)  **Y Street Capital:** Website: [www.ystreetcapital.com](http://www.ystreetcapital.com)   Facebook: [www.facebook.com/YStreetCapital](https://www.facebook.com/YStreetCapital)   Instagram: [@ystreetcapital](http://www.instagram.com/ystreetcapital)  

If you're a first gen homebuyer starting your journey, this episode breaks down exactly what a mortgage is—and how to choose the best one for your financial situation.You'll learn:What a mortgage really includes (spoiler: it's more than just the loan)The 3 most common types of mortgages: Conventional, FHA, and VA/USDA loansThe difference between PMI and MIP—and why it mattersHow to compare banks, online lenders, and brokers (without getting overwhelmed)Whether you're early in your credit journey or ready to buy in the next year, this episode will help you feel confident navigating one of the biggest financial decisions of your life.1:1 Money Coaching: 1:1 is a money & investing coaching program for first gen WOC who want to financially prepare to buy their first or next home. Inside 1:1, we'll map out the best strategy to set a house budget, save for a downpayment by investing and set you up to have the best credit to get the most competitive mortgage. ⁠⁠Book a free call her to learn more about 1:1 money coaching.

Ready to craft your winning fantasy strategy for 2025? Rick Kamla & Dr. A deliver the ultimate deep dive into the Hawks, Heat, and Magic offseason: Hawks: Did Dyson Daniels secure MIP with historic defense? Trae Young's assist dominance and the explosive breakout value from Onyeka Okongwu & Jalen Johnson. Get our definitive take! Heat: Tyler Herro's All-Star surge (23.9/5.5/3.3 from deep) was undeniable. But what's the real story behind the Butler trade rumors and drama? And why are rookies like Kel'el Ware now crucial dynasty stashes? Magic: Paolo Banchero dazzled with his 50-point outing and strong return from injury, while Franz Wagner remained a consistent force. But with their underperformance, who's the must-have stash, and who should you fade immediately? We conclude with our most valuable offseason targets, high-upside sleepers, and key draft decisions to watch as we head into the 2025 fantasy season. Don't miss these actionable insights!

Today, Clark recommends a simple measure we can take to help protect our financial accounts, and those of our aging loved ones, from fraud. Also - many are looking to book their summer travel, and the airlines are raising prices. Clark shares strategies to bend that price curve in your favor.  Trusted Contacts: Segment 1 Ask Clark: Segment 2 Navigating Airfares: Segment 3 Ask Clark: Segment 4 Mentioned on the show: Why You Should Name a Trusted Contact How to protect yourself against financial exploitation - Vanguard How To Cancel & Get Rid of PMI Earlier What's the difference between PMI and MIP? National Association of Enrolled Agents Best 529 College Savings Plans By State Clark Howard's Airfare Price Predictions for 2025 Follow Clark Howard's #1 Rule To Travel Cheap NYTimes: Prices: A Mixed Outlook on Flights, Hotels and Cruises Coming to a Tiny Airport Near You: New Airlines Booking a Cruise? Here Are 5 Ways To Do It for Less Tipping on a Cruise: Your Complete Big-Ship Tip Guide InsureMyTrip Review: Why We Like It and How to Use It Clark.com resources Episode transcripts Community.Clark.com / Ask Clark Clark.com daily money newsletter Consumer Action Center Free Helpline: 636-492-5275 Learn more about your ad choices: megaphone.fm/adchoices Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices