Podcasts about design science

Conceptual papers that offer new theories are hard to write and even harder to publish. You do not have empirical data to back up your arguments, which makes the papers easy to reject in the review cycle. We are also typically not well trained in theorizing, and there isn't even a clear process to theorizing we could learn or follow. Does that mean that we shouldn't even try to write theory papers? We ponder these questions, figure out what is so hard in writing conceptual papers – and share a few tricks that might help if you still wanted to write such a paper.  References Berente, N., Gu, B., Recker, J., & Santhanam, R. (2021). Managing Artificial Intelligence. MIS Quarterly, 45(3), 1433-1450. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine Publishing Company. Watson, R. T., Boudreau, M.-C., & Chen, A. J. (2010). Information Systems and Environmentally Sustainable Development:  Energy Informatics and New Directions for the IS Community. MIS Quarterly, 34(1), 23-38. Lee, A. S., & Baskerville, R. (2003). Generalizing Generalizability in Information Systems Research. Information Systems Research, 14(3), 221-243. Tsang, E. W. K., & Williams, J. N. (2012). Generalization and Induction: Misconceptions, Clarifications, and a Classification of Induction. MIS Quarterly, 36(3), 729-748. Yoo, Y., Henfridsson, O., & Lyytinen, K. (2010). The New Organizing Logic of Digital Innovation: An Agenda for Information Systems Research. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 724-735. Yoo, Y. (2010). Computing in Everyday Life: A Call for Research on Experiential Computing. MIS Quarterly, 34(2), 213-231. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of Perception Routledge. Baldwin, C. Y., & Clark, K. B. (2000). Design Rules, Volume 1: The Power of Modularity. MIT Press. Weick, K. E. (1989). Theory Construction as Disciplined Imagination. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 516-531. Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design Science in Information Systems Research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75-105. Sætre, A. S., & van de Ven, A. H. (2021). Generating Theory by Abduction. Academy of Management Review, 46(4), 684-701. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-291. Farjoun, M. (2010). Beyond Dualism: Stability and Change As a Duality. Academy of Management Review, 35(2), 202-225. Recker, J., & Green, P. (2019). How do Individuals Interpret Multiple Conceptual Models? A Theory of Combined Ontological Completeness and Overlap. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 20(8), 1210-1241. Jabbari, M., Recker, J., Green, P., & Werder, K. (2022). How Do Individuals Understand Multiple Conceptual Modeling Scripts? Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 23(4), 1037-1070. Cornelissen, J. P. (2017). Editor's Comments: Developing Propositions, a Process Model, or a Typology? Addressing the Challenges of Writing Theory Without a Boilerplate. Academy of Management Review, 42(1), 1-9. Recker, J., Lukyanenko, R., Jabbari, M., Samuel, B. M., & Castellanos, A. (2021). From Representation to Mediation: A New Agenda for Conceptual Modeling Research in a Digital World. MIS Quarterly, 45(1), 269-300. Haerem, T., Pentland, B. T., & Miller, K. (2015). Task Complexity: Extending a Core Concept. Academy of Management Review, 40(3), 446-460. Kallinikos, J., Aaltonen, A., & Marton, A. (2013). The Ambivalent Ontology of Digital Artifacts. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 357-370. Ho, S. Y., Recker, J., Tan, C.-W., Vance, A., & Zhang, H. (2023). MISQ Special Issue on Registered Reports. MIS Quarterly, . Simon, H. A. (1990). Bounded Rationality. In J. Eatwell, M. Milgate, & P. Newman (Eds.), Utility and Probability (pp. 15-18). Palgrave Macmillan. James, W. (1890). The Principles of Psychology. Henry Holt and Company. Watson, H. J. (2009). Tutorial: Business Intelligence - Past, Present, and Future. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 25(39), 487-510.  Baird, A., & Maruping, L. M. (2021). The Next Generation of Research on IS Use: A Theoretical Framework of Delegation to and from Agentic IS Artifacts. MIS Quarterly, 45(1), 315-341.

Did you know that when you spend time on an online platform, you could be experiencing between six to eight different experimental treatments that stem from several hundred A/B tests that run concurrently? That's how common digital experimentation is today. And while this may be acceptable in industry, large-scale digital experimentation poses some substantial challenges for researchers wanting to evaluate theories and disconfirm hypotheses through randomized controlled trials done on digital platforms. Thankfully, the brilliant has a new paper forthcoming that illuminates the orthogonal testing plane problem and offers some guidelines for sidestepping the issue. So if experiments are your thing, you really need to listen to what is really going on out there. References Abbasi, A., Somanchi, S., & Kelley, K. (2024). The Critical Challenge of using Large-scale Digital Experiment Platforms for Scientific Discovery. MIS Quarterly, . Miranda, S. M., Berente, N., Seidel, S., Safadi, H., & Burton-Jones, A. (2022). Computationally Intensive Theory Construction: A Primer for Authors and Reviewers. MIS Quarterly, 46(2), i-xvi. Karahanna, E., Benbasat, I., Bapna, R., & Rai, A. (2018). Editor's Comments: Opportunities and Challenges for Different Types of Online Experiments. MIS Quarterly, 42(4), iii-x. Kohavi, R., & Thomke, S. (2017). The Surprising Power of Online Experiments. Harvard Business Review, 95(5), 74-82. Fisher, R. A. (1935). The Design of Experiments. Oliver and Boyd. Pienta, D., Vishwamitra, N., Somanchi, S., Berente, N., & Thatcher, J. B. (2024). Do Crowds Validate False Data? Systematic Distortion and Affective Polarization. MIS Quarterly, . Bapna, R., Goes, P. B., Gupta, A., & Jin, Y. (2004). User Heterogeneity and Its Impact on Electronic Auction Market Design: An Empirical Exploration. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 21-43. Somanchi, S., Abbasi, A., Kelley, K., Dobolyi, D., & Yuan, T. T. (2023). Examining User Heterogeneity in Digital Experiments. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 41(4), 1-34. Mertens, W., & Recker, J. (2020). New Guidelines for Null Hypothesis Significance Testing in Hypothetico-Deductive IS Research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 21(4), 1072-1102. GRADE Working Group. (2004). Grading Quality of Evidence and Strength of Recommendations. British Medical Journal, 328(7454), 1490-1494. Abbasi, A., Parsons, J., Pant, G., Liu Sheng, O. R., & Sarker, S. (2024). Pathways for Design Research on Artificial Intelligence. Information Systems Research, 35(2), 441-459. Abbasi, A., Chiang, R. H. L., & Xu, J. (2023). Data Science for Social Good. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 24(6), 1439-1458. Babar, Y., Mahdavi Adeli, A., & Burtch, G. (2023). The Effects of Online Social Identity Signals on Retailer Demand. Management Science, 69(12), 7335-7346. Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design Science in Information Systems Research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75-105. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-291. Benbasat, I., & Zmud, R. W. (2003). The Identity Crisis Within The IS Discipline: Defining and Communicating The Discipline's Core Properties. MIS Quarterly, 27(2), 183-194. Gregor, S., & Hevner, A. R. (2013). Positioning and Presenting Design Science Research for Maximum Impact. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 337-355. Rai, A. (2017). Editor's Comments: Avoiding Type III Errors: Formulating IS Research Problems that Matter. MIS Quarterly, 41(2), iii-vii. Burton-Jones, A. (2023). Editor's Comments: Producing Significant Research. MIS Quarterly, 47(1), i-xv.  Abbasi, A., Dillon, R., Rao, H. R., & Liu Sheng, O. R. (2024). Preparedness and Response in the Century of Disasters: Overview of Information Systems Research Frontiers. Information Systems Research, 35(2), 460-468.

On this episode, I was joined by David Grosse-Wentrup, Research Director for Human Factors at Design Science Group. David walks through: David Grosse-Wentrup PhD is a Research Director at Design Science, a global human factors consultancy focused on advancing healthcare technology through user research and design evaluation. After his studies in biomedical engineering and postgraduate research at the University of Muenster, Germany, as well as work for the Centre for Global eHealth Innovation (Toronto) and GE Healthcare (Wuxi, China), he joined Design Science's U.S. office in 2016. At Design Science, David supports clients in developing and approving medical devices and combination products for the U.S and E.U. markets. He currently is leading efforts to open Design Science's first European office in Munich, Germany. He completed his PhD at the University of Münster in 2024.

is with us today. She has done some amazing theory construct research using computational methods before this was really an accepted thing. We discuss which work she built her research around to give it legitimacy, what good stopping rules are for authors or reviewers to know when enough is enough, and how we can engage in humble generalizations of interesting and general regularities. References Miranda, S. M., Kim, I., & Summers, J. D. (2015). Jamming with Social Media: How Cognitive Structuring of Organizing Vision Facets Affects IT Innovation Diffusion. MIS Quarterly, 39(3), 591-614. Walsh, I., Holton, J. A., Bailyn, L., Fernandez, W. D., Levina, N., & Glaser, B. G. (2015). What Grounded Theory Is ... A Critically Reflective  Conversation Among Scholars. Organizational Research Methods, 18(4), 581-599. Levina, N., & Vaast, E. (2015). Leveraging Archival Data from Online Communities for Grounded Process Theorizing. In K. D. Elsbach & R. M. Kramer (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Organizational Research: Innovative Pathways and Methods (pp. 215-224). Routledge. Berente, N., Seidel, S., & Safadi, H. (2019). Data-Driven Computationally-Intensive Theory Development. Information Systems Research, 30(1), 50-64. Miranda, S. M., Wang, D., & Tian, C. (2022). Discursive Fields and the Diversity-Coherence Paradox: An Ecological Perspective on the Blockchain Community Discourse. MIS Quarterly, 46(3), 1421-1452. Fügener, A., Grahl, J., Gupta, A., & Ketter, W. (2021). Will Humans-in-the-Loop Become Borgs? Merits and Pitfalls of Working with AI. MIS Quarterly, 45(3), 1527-1556. Lindberg, A., Schecter, A., Berente, N., Hennel, P., & Lyytinen, K. (2024). The Entrainment of Task Allocation and Release Cycles in Open Source Software Development. MIS Quarterly, 48(1), 67-94. Sahaym, A., Vithayathil, J., Sarker, S., Sarker, S., & Bjørn-Andersen, N. (2023). Value Destruction in Information Technology Ecosystems: A Mixed-Method Investigation with Interpretive Case Study and Analytical Modeling. Information Systems Research, 34(2), 508-531. Miranda, S. M., Berente, N., Seidel, S., Safadi, H., & Burton-Jones, A. (2022). Computationally Intensive Theory Construction: A Primer for Authors and Reviewers. MIS Quarterly, 46(2), i-xvi. Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design Science in Information Systems Research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75-105. Adamic, L. A., & Glance, N. (2005). The Political Blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. Election: Divided They Blog. Paper presented at the 3rd International Workshop on Link Discovery, Chicago, Illinois. Pentland, B. T., Vaast, E., & Ryan Wolf, J. (2021). Theorizing Process Dynamics with Directed Graphs: A Diachronic Analysis of Digital Trace Data. MIS Quarterly, 45(2), 967-984. Sarker, S., Xiao, X., Beaulieu, T., & Lee, A. S. (2018). Learning from First-Generation Qualitative Approaches in the IS Discipline: An Evolutionary View and Some Implications for Authors and Evaluators (PART 1/2). Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 19(8), 752-774. Lee, A. S., & Baskerville, R. (2003). Generalizing Generalizability in Information Systems Research. Information Systems Research, 14(3), 221-243. Tsang, E. W. K., & Williams, J. N. (2012). Generalization and Induction: Misconceptions, Clarifications, and a Classification of Induction. MIS Quarterly, 36(3), 729-748. Hume, D. (1748/1998). An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding [Reprint]. In J. Perry & M. E. Bratman (Eds.), Introduction to Philosophy: Classical and Contemporary Readings (3rd ed., pp. 190-220). Oxford University Press.   Exemplar Computationally-intensive Theory Construction Papers Bachura, E., Valecha, R., Chen, R., & Rao, H. R. (2022). The OPM Data Breach: An Investigation of Shared Emotional Reactions on Twitter. MIS Quarterly, 46(2), 881-910. Gal, U., Berente, N., & Chasin, F. (2022). Technology Lifecycles and Digital Innovation: Patterns of Discourse Across Levels of Abstraction: A Study of Wikipedia Articles. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 23(5), 1102-1149. Hahn, J., & Lee, G. (2021). The Complex Effects of Cross-Domain Knowledge on IS Development: A Simulation-Based Theory Development. MIS Quarterly, 45(4), 2023-2054. Indulska, M., Hovorka, D. S., & Recker, J. (2012). Quantitative Approaches to Content Analysis: Identifying Conceptual Drift Across Publication Outlets. European Journal of Information Systems, 21(1), 49-69. Lindberg, A., Majchrzak, A., & Malhotra, A. (2022). How Information Contributed After an Idea Shapes New High-Quality Ideas in Online Ideation Contests. MIS Quarterly, 46(2), 1195-1208. Nan, N. (2011). Capturing Bottom-Up Information Technology Use Processes: A Complex Adaptive Systems Model. MIS Quarterly, 35(2), 505-532. Pentland, B. T., Recker, J., Ryan Wolf, J., & Wyner, G. (2020). Bringing Context Inside Process Research With Digital Trace Data. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 21(5), 1214-1236. Vaast, E., Safadi, H., Lapointe, L., & Negoita, B. (2017). Social Media Affordances for Connective Action: An Examination of Microblogging Use During the Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill. MIS Quarterly, 41(4), 1179-1205. 

Peter will introduce an overview of his latest book, “An Informed Cosmos: Essays on Intelligent Design", examining the key theoretical and empirical claims of “ID” and reviewing the discussion about whether “ID” is “science”.To view a transcript of this lecture, listen here. For more resources, visit the L'Abri Ideas Library at labriideaslibrary.org. The library contains over one thousand lectures and discussions that explore questions about the reality and relevance of Christianity. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit englishlabri.substack.com

Specializing in designing science laboratories, Marilee is a registered architect and Senior Laboratory Planner at HED, one of the oldest and largest architecture and engineering firms in the country.   

On this episode, I was joined by Sara Waxberg MacNew, Chief Scientific Officer at Design Sciences. On this episode Sara and I discuss: New FDA Guidance: Critical Task Definition for Combination Products Pre-Clinical HF Studies in readiness for IND Submission URRA Human Factors Validation vs. Design Validation Sara Waxberg McNew is the Chief Scientific Officer at Design Science, a human factors firm that specializes in healthcare. Sara has held roles previously in user centered design leadership at Eli Lilly, Philips Healthcare, and Baxter Healthcare. She is an active member of AAMI where she has contributed to the development and revision of human factors technical information reports and international standards. Learn more about Design Science's impact on Healthcare Technology by following @designscience on all social media platforms.

V Ljubljani se danes začenja že tretja poletna šola Oblikovanje in znanost - ker je mednarodna torej "Design + Science " - na kateri bodo do petka govorili na temo "parainteligenca". Arhitekti, umetniki, oblikovalci, računalničarji in naravoslovci bodo iskali plodne povezave bodisi na robovih ali onstran ustaljenih razumevanj teh področij. Predstavnika organizatorja šole, prof. Boštjan Botas Kenda z ljubljanske Akademije za likovno umetnost in oblikovanje in Maja Drobne - KUD PiNA, pojasnjujeta podrobnosti srečanja dveh ducatov udeležencev. Prvo srečanje leta 2021 so pripravili na temo "sintetična hrana", lani pa so govorili o "kohabitaciji". Letos šolo organizirajo v sodelovanju s Fakulteto za kemijo in kemijsko tehnologijo (UL FKKT), z Oddelkom za oblikovanje vizualnih komunikacij Umetniške akademije v Splitu, z Inštitutom Joanneum Univerze uporabnih znanosti v Gradcu in s Cankarjevim domom. FOTO: 3.poletna šola Design+Science 2023 VIR: Tine Lisjak

Découvrez le livre NEUROSAPIENS, sorti le 26 janvier aux éditions Les Arènes ! Pour apprendre à créer rapidement et à moindre coût son podcast, c'est par ici ! Si vous passez un peu de temps sur les réseaux sociaux, vous êtes sûrement déjà tombé sur des fake news. Dans cet épisode je vais vous donner quelques conseils pour repérer les fake news et ne pas vous laisser avoir. Production, animation, réalisation et illustration : Anaïs Roux Instagram : https://www.instagram.com/neurosapiens.podcast/ Ecriture : Thaïs Marques Son Instagram : https://www.instagram.com/study_and_t/?hl=fr   Produit et distribué en association avec LACME Production. Audio :  Play-Doh meets Dora - Carmen María and Edu Espinal Sources :  Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2021). The psychology of fake news. Trends in cognitive sciences, 25(5), 388-402. Nguyen, V. C., Birnbaum, M., & De Choudhury, M. (2023). Understanding and Mitigating Mental Health Misinformation on Video Sharing Platforms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.07417. Yeung, A., Ng, E., & Abi-Jaoude, E. (2022). TikTok and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a cross-sectional study of social media content quality. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 67(12), 899-906. Geeng, C., Yee, S., & Roesner, F. (2020, April). Fake news on Facebook and Twitter: Investigating how people (don't) investigate. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1-14). Bago, B., Rand, D. G., & Pennycook, G. (2020). Fake news, fast and slow: Deliberation reduces belief in false (but not true) news headlines. Journal of experimental psychology: general, 149(8), 1608. Burkhardt, J. M. (2017). Combating fake news in the digital age(Vol. 53, No. 8, pp. 5-9). Chicago, IL, USA: American Library Association. Gilbert, D. T. (1991). How mental systems believe. American psychologist, 46(2), 107. Kannengiesser, U., & Gero, J. S. (2019). Design thinking, fast and slow: a framework for Kahneman's dual-system theory in design. Design Science, 5, e10.

Welcome back for another episode in the "22 Lessons on Ethics and Technology Series! In this episode of the series, I speak to Dr. Eric Katz, and we take on the common utopian mythology of technology as inherently progressive, focusing specifically on the frequent slide from utopianism into terror. We talk about the uses of technology during the Holocaust and the specific ways in which scientists, architects, medical professionals, businessmen, and engineers participated in the planning and operation of the concentration and extermination camps that were the foundation of the 'final solution'. How can we think about the claims of technological progress in light of the Nazi's use of science and technology in their killing operations? And what can we learn from the Nazi past about how our commitment to a vision of technological progress can go horrifically wrong?   Dr. Eric Katz is Professor Emeritus of Philosophy in the Department of Humanities at the New Jersey Institute of Technology.  He received a B.A. in Philosophy from Yale in 1974 and a Ph.D.in Philosophy from Boston Universityin 1983.  His research focuses on environmental ethics, philosophy of technology, engineering ethics, Holocaust studies, and the synergistic connections among these fields.  He is especially known for his criticism of the policy of ecological restoration.  Dr. Katz has published over 80 articles and essays in these fields, as well as two books: Anne Frank's Tree: Nature's Confrontation with Technology, Domination, and the Holocaust (White Horse Press, 2015) and Nature as Subject: Human Obligation and Natural Community (Rowman and Littlefield, 1997), winner of the CHOICE book award for “Outstanding Academic Books for 1997.” He is the editor of Death by Design: Science, Technology, and Engineering in Nazi Germany (Pearson/Longman, 2006).  He has co-edited (with Andrew Light) the collection Environmental Pragmatism  (London: Routledge, 1996) and (with Andrew Light and David Rothenberg) the collection Beneath the Surface: Critical Essays in the Philosophy of Deep Ecology (Cambridge: MIT Press, 2000). He was the Book Review Editor of the journal Environmental Ethics from 1996-2014, and he was the founding Vice-President of the International Society for Environmental Ethics in 1990.  From 1991-2007 he was the Director of the Science, Technology, and Society (STS) program at NJIT. His current research projects involve science, technology, and environmental policy in Nazi Germany.

It's late at night. Only because Jan has been asked to talk about something he knows very little about so we asked someone at the other side of the planet for help – the wonderful . With her on the show, it is finally time to talk about design science, clichés and stereotypes. We wonder whether more people write about doing design science than actually do design science, how scholarly design research has to be, and why might be the most successful design scientist of all time. As usual, the references to readings we mention are listed on .

Stephen Meyer vs. Peter Ward.  Is Intelligent Design Science? Intelligent Design and Darwinian Evolution. https://youtu.be/0gopgwYTkq0 3,933 views Jun 15, 2022 Stephen Meyer 29.4K subscribers Stephen Meyer squares off with University of Washington paleontologist Peter Ward in this Talk of the Times Debate in Seattle on April 26th, 2006. The topic? Is intelligent design science?  ====================================================== This is the official Youtube page of Dr. Stephen Meyer, director of Discovery Institute's Center for Science & Culture. Meyer received his Ph.D. in the philosophy of science from the University of Cambridge. His latest book is Return of the God Hypothesis: Three Scientific Discoveries that Reveal the Mind Behind the Universe (2021), see https://returnofthegodhypothesis.com/. Praise for Return of the God Hypothesis: "This book makes it clear that far from being an unscientific claim, intelligent design is valid science." BRIAN JOSEPHSON, NOBEL LAUREATE IN PHYSICS; FELLOW OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY; EMERITUS PROFESSOR OF PHYSICS, UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE Meyer is also the author of The New York Times best selling book Darwin's Doubt: The Explosive Origin of Animal Life and the case for Intelligent Design (HarperOne, 2013), and Signature In The Cell: DNA and the Evidence for Intelligent Design (2009). For more information about Dr. Meyer, his research, and his books visit https://stephencmeyer.org/. "No one else in my experience can explicate such complex material with the grace and clarity that seem so effortless to Stephen Meyer. With cold logic and meticulous rational analysis of the latest discoveries in cosmology, physics, and biology, Meyer confirms a truth that the ideologues find too frightening even to consider. By the ad hominem nature of their attacks on his brilliant work, they confirm its importance and suggest an eventual end to the scientism that warps our culture." DEAN KOONTZ, NEW YORK TIMES #1 BEST-SELLING AUTHOR The CSC is the institutional hub for scientists, educators, and inquiring minds who think that nature supplies compelling evidence of intelligent design. The CSC supports research, sponsors educational programs, defends free speech, and produce articles, books, and multimedia content. Visit other Youtube channels connected to the Center for Science & Culture Discovery Institute: https://www.youtube.com/user/Discover... The Magician's Twin - CS Lewis & Evolution: https://www.youtube.com/user/cslewisweb Darwin's Heretic - Alfred Russel Wallce: https://www.youtube.com/user/AlfredRW... For more information visit -- https://www.discovery.org/id/ -- http://www.evolutionnews.org/ -- http://www.intelligentdesign.org/ Follow the CSC on Facebook and Twitter: Twitter: @discoverycsc Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/discoverycsc/

This week Kirk & Kurtts sit down with Fernando Arendar (https://www.linkedin.com/in/fernandoarendar/), founder of Nitid Studio (https://www.nitidstudio.com/) , a branding agency specializing in the CPG space.Fernando shared his unique approach to design which involves the intersection of consumer psychology and science to create objective results. Enjoy y'all!Catch up on all episodes here: https://kirkkurtts.buzzsprout.comAbout Kirk and AndyKirk Visola is the Creative Director and Founder of MIND THE FONT™. He brings over 20 years of CPG experience to the packaging and branding design space, and understands how shelf aesthetics can make an impact for established and emerging brands. Check out their work at http://www.mindthefont.com.Andy Kurtts is the Creative Director and Founder of Buttermilk Creative. He loves a good coffee in the morning and a good bourbon at night. When he's not working on packaging design he's running in the backyard with his family. Check out Buttermilk's work at http://www.buttermillkcreative.com.

Today we continue what is going to be at least a 5 part series on the design science of Permaculture.  These will be both done as audio podcasts and in live feeds with support from power point slides.  This series … Continue reading →

Today we continue what is going to be at least a 5 part series on the design science of Permaculture.  These will be both done as audio podcasts and in live feeds with support from power point slides.  This series … Continue reading →

Today we continue what is going to be at least a 5 part series on the design science of Permaculture.  These will be both done as audio podcasts and in live feeds with support from power point slides.  This series … Continue reading →

Today we continue what is going to be at least a 5 part series on the design science of Permaculture.  These will be both done as audio podcasts and in live feeds with support from power point slides.  This series … Continue reading →

Today we continue what is going to be at least a 5 part series on the design science of Permaculture.  These will be both done as audio podcasts and in live feeds with support from power point slides.  This series … Continue reading →

Today's ID the Future from the vault brings listeners Part 2 of Nate Herbst of The God Solution and Casey Luskin of the Center for Science and Culture discussing intelligent design. Source

Today's ID the Future from the vault brings listeners Part 2 of Nate Herbst of The God Solution and Casey Luskin of the Center for Science and Culture discussing intelligent design. Here the two look at why some people conflate intelligent design with creationism, and what distinguishes the two. Luskin explains the positive argument for intelligent design from biological information. And he notes that various proponents of intelligent design take widely divergent views on religion, which he says tells us something important about ID's evidential basis. Tune in to learn more. Source

Today we are beginning what is going to be at least a 5 part series on the design science of Permaculture.  These will be both done as audio podcasts and in live feeds with support from power point slides.  This … Continue reading →

Chances are if you've heard anything about intelligent design, you've heard that it's faith-based, not science-based. Is that true? Or does modern science, in fact, point us in the direction of a designing intelligence?

Happy Holidays everyone! On this episode of the Combinate Podcast, we had Sara Waxberg McNew, Chief Scientific Officer at Design Science. Sara and I talk about her interest in Human Factors and her career, we discuss who is a user and how to get close to them, how to read the ANSI/AAMI HE75:2009 (R2018) and IEC 62366-1:2015 standards, the design validation process and how human factors formative and summative evaluations fit in, human factors considerations for combination products, and figuring out what users need vs. want. Sara Waxberg McNew is the Chief Scientific Officer at Design Science, a human factors firm that specializes in healthcare. Sara has held roles previously in user centered design leadership at Eli Lilly and Company, Philips Healthcare, and Baxter Healthcare. Throughout these experiences, she has led cross functional teams, selected and managed human factors consultants (and now is one), interacted with the FDA and international regulatory agencies, and executed on created corporate level strategic plans for human factors. At each of these organizations, she was accountable to ensure intended end-users are effectively represented and their needs are considered throughout the product lifecycle in order to reduce the potential for use error, satisfy target customers, and comply with regulatory requirements. Sara has a B.S. in Human Factors Engineering and Biomedical Engineering Design from Tufts University, where she has also completed her M.S. course work. She is an active member of the Association for Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) where she has contributed to the development and revision of human factors technical information reports and international standards.  Design Science is retained by the world's leading companies to assure that their products fit user needs. Design Science conducts rigorous research and design user interfaces to optimize usability, safety, and customer appeal of products. Founded in 1991, Design Science was one of the first consultancies to focus on the person/product interface. They have deep roots in those product categories where usability is mission critical—particularly medical devices, but also other products that are tools: commercial, industrial, or consumer.

Episode Summary:In today's episode of Cup of Confidence, we are joined by a special guest, Jenny Ambrose. She is an award-winning Science & Strategies Studio owner and Owner of “Puree Fantastico.” In today's episode, Jenny shares with us how she created the concept of design science and strategy. She believes that design is visual for everyone to see, but it's also a structure of how we feel and treat people through experiences. Jenny also shares her story about starting entrepreneurship at such a young age and the confidence it took to stand out on her own. Her belief is if people loved what they do, the world would be a positive environment. Such a beautiful and fun episode- stay tuned! Thanks for Listening:Thanks so much for listening to my podcast! If you enjoyed this episode and think that others could benefit from listening, please share it using the social media buttons on this page. Do you have some feedback or questions about this episode? Leave a comment in the section below!Subscribing to The Podcast:If you would like to get automatic updates of new podcast episodes, you can follow the podcast on Apple Podcasts or Stitcher. You can also give Cup of Confidence a follow on your favorite podcast app.Leave Us an Apple Podcasts Review:Ratings and reviews from our listeners are extremely valuable to us and greatly appreciated. They help our podcast rank higher on Apple Podcasts, which exposes our show to more awesome listeners like you.Guest Bio:Jenny Ambrose is the owner of “Puree Fantastico”, award-winning design science and strategy studio offering visual, verbal, strategic + mental experiences.  She is also an award-winning artist and innovative thinker. Jenny uses her background in design, anthropology, geometry, and philosophy to derive visual, verbal, and strategic development that makes you irresistible to your ideal client and market. She brings everything to the table to create a truly unique, creative, and safe environment for your circumstances. Jenny is beyond encouraging and the way she uses her creativity in sessions!Guest Links: Website:https://www.pureefantastico.com/ Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/pureefantastico  Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/pureefantastico/ 

On this show, Suzanne Lynn is joined by Herb G. Bennett, "Design Science in the new Paradigm Age;" Martha Rhodes, "3,000 Pulses Later;" Lou Hernandez; "Curse of the Cobalt Moon;" as well as Robin Skaggs, managing broker at Watson Realty Corp. Mount Dora, Florida.

Jofish Kaye is a computer scientist who aligns design, data, and qualitative exploration for human-centered product innovation.His superb track record as a scholar includes more than 100 publications and affiliations with MIT, Cornell, and Microsoft Research. Surprisingly, his career has been in corporations: following stints at Nokia, Yahoo, and Mozilla, he is now a director of AI and UX at Anthem.I have been a fan of his work for many years – he is a brilliant research writer whose takes are as entertaining as they are rigorous and instructive. In the longest episode of Design Disciplin to date, we had a massively wide-ranging conversation on pretty much all of our mutual interests: research, philosophy, social sciences, leadership, and more.https://designdisciplin.com/jofish-kaye# Books, Links, and Resources- Jofish Kaye on the Changing Academic Life Podcast by Geraldine Fitzpatrick: http://www.changingacademiclife.com/blog/2019/2/2/jofish-kaye- The Mundanity of Excellence: An Ethnographic Report on Stratification and Olympic Swimmers by Daniel F. Chambliss: https://academics.hamilton.edu/documents/themundanityofexcellence.pdf- The Structure of Scientific Revolutions by Thomas Kuhn: https://geni.us/structure-of-sci- Undisciplined disciples: everything you always wanted to know about ethnomethodology but were afraid to ask Yoda by Alan F. Blackwell, Mark Blythe, and Jofish Kaye: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-017-0999-z# Connect with Design Disciplin- Website: http://designdisciplin.com​​- Podcast: http://podcast.designdisciplin.com​​- Instagram: http://instagram.com/designdisciplin/​​- Twitter: http://twitter.com/designdisciplin/​​- YouTube: http://youtube.com/channel/UCtXM3JdnE...​- Bookstore: http://designdisciplin.com​/bookstore​# Connect with Jofish Kaye- Personal Website: http://jofish.com/- Twitter: https://twitter.com/jofish- LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/jofish# Episode Bookmarks00:00:00​ What does Jofish mean?00:02:00 Being a Scientist in Design00:06:05 Methods for Understanding Users00:10:17 Ethnomethodology00:13:04 Epistemology00:16:00 On Books and Papers00:18:53 On Videos, Documents, and Slide Decks00:25:52 Tactical Design00:28:13 New Job as Director of UX and AI00:33:49 Studying at MIT and Cornell00:38:00 Academia vs. Corporations, and the HCI Research Community00:43:32 Being a Scientist at a Corporation00:46:49 Productivity, Priorities, and Balance00:58:30 Publishing Research, at Corporations01:06:27 The Meaning of Design01:07:27 Places and Tools for Work01:08:33 Life Outside Work01:09:44 Closing

Roxi Shohadaee is the Director and ARTchitect of the Design Science Studio, a program of the Buckminster Fuller Institute and habRitual, a decade-long anticipatory art and design-driven accelerator inspiring a future that works for 100% of LIFE. To transform our collective capacity and create a harmonic future we must first envision it. As such, the studio empowers global creators, systems thinkers, organizations and initiatives to imagine, collaborate and create a regenerative future together. In addition to stewarding the Design Science Studio, Roxi is the Founder and CEO of habRitual: an interdisciplinary experiential design and immersive art studio, creating at the intersection of art, technology and nature to reach, educate, and inspire diverse groups of people. Her work traverses scales, from land based projects to civic installations. Some of her other notable projects include being the supervising producer for the Planet Home Village, advising End of You at Gray Area, co-producing LMNL at Onedome, co-founding Wild Vessel and Reimagine: End of Life, creative producing Interactive Art for Lighting in a Bottle and Symbiosis Music Festivals and co-producing the Burning Man Global Leadership Conference, Desert Arts Preview and Artists' Symposium. As an interdisciplinary designer, experiential producer, contemporary artist, and creative doula her mission is to catalyze social and systemic change through inclusive, cross-disciplinary collaborations for the regeneration of our planet and culture. Her path is grounded in a commitment to creating inspiring and embodied ways of learning together. She is a deep believer and practitioner in designing for states of being, having those states of being prime us for connection with ourselves, each other and our beautiful living planet! Support Julian & this Podcast: https://www.patreon.com/julianguderley --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/julian-guderley/support

№9 Page Chen, Remote LearnerMy guest for today's episode is Dr. Page Chen, President and Chief Innovation Officer of Remote Learner. Based in Denver, CO, Remote Learner continues to innovate in technology as well as the learning process itself.The services and solutions that Remote Learner delivers for their clients are built on a foundation of something Page calls Persuasive Design Strategies. Persuasive Design was the focus of Page's doctoral research and, as you'll hear in a few minutes, provide some very compelling strategies for achieving successful outcomes for learners and staff. You can find the full article Page and I discuss in the podcast below.I think you will find this conversation very persuasive, as Page and I talk about:Friction! And what can we do to radically simplify and remove as many steps as possible between a student and their learning outcomes.We also walk through the 7 elements of Persuasive Design that you can use today to start improving your course outcomes.The simple power of continuous reinforcement, and how Page's favorite plugin makes it dead easy and super engaging.This is the article Page and I discuss: Designing to Persuade a Learning State of Mind~

In this episode, I am highlighting the interdisciplinary work of Buckminster Fuller and his emphasis on whole systems design. His approach of doing more with less has had a huge impact on folks both within and outside of Permaculture Design practice - including myself long before I heard the word Permaculture, I learned about Bucky Fuller, Geodesic domes, the Whole Earth Catalog and the whole systems design movement of the early & mid 20th Century. I also really identified with his discipline of learning for oneself, from direct experience - He states that "man must learn to think for himself, rather than follow blindly what he has been taught." I hope enjoy another show digging into the roots of Permaculture...

Love this show? Join our Next Economy Now community on Patreon: http://patreon.com/nexteconomynow Love this episode? Let us know by leaving a tip with a note saying which episode you loved and why: https://venmo.com/code?user_id=2311213312638976823 www.paypal.me/baskinimpact For the show notes (guest bio, summary, resources, etc), go to: www.lifteconomy.com/podcast.

In this installment of the Detroit Worldwide Podcast, Marquis connects with emerging scholar, thought leader, engineer, and STEM advocate , Matthew Nelson about the importance of goal setting and what it means to persevere over life challenges.   Matthew also discusses his lived experience attending the University of Michigan as an adult learner as well as his transition into leadership roles within the world of STEM.    About Matthew:   Matthew Nelson is the National Chairperson Emeritus of the National Society of Black Engineers. As National Chair from 2018-2019, he led the efforts to increase the number of undergraduate engineering degrees earned by black students annually from roughly 3,500 to 10,000 by the year 2025. During his tenure, NSBE grew its membership base by 26%, significantly increased the number of NSBE Jr. chapters, improved its fiscal forecasting and management capabilities and successfully executed two of the highest attended Annual Conventions in the history of the Society.   A graduate of Frank Cody High School, Matthew's collegiate journey began at the University of Michigan in 2002, where he struggled just to maintain a below-average GPA. After falling out of the engineering pipeline, Matthew spent several years working to return to higher academia. Matthew returned to Lansing Community College in 2011, where he made the President's List with a 3.91 GPA and received induction to Phi Theta Kappa Honors Society. At that point, Matthew decided to return to Michigan to finish his journey and to share his testimony. Matthew earned University Honors, made the Dean’s List, earned the College of Engineering Distinguished Leadership Award, and was awarded the first-ever Center for Engineering and Outreach (CEDO) Legacy Award for his work in Engineering Diversity.   Matthew earned his Bachelor of Science in Industrial and Operations Engineering with a minor in Multidisciplinary Design and a Master of Science in Design Science, and is currently pursuing a PhD in the latter. As a Bridge to the Doctorate Fellow and Rackham Merit Fellow, Matthew researches the integration of design heuristics and data analytics into human capital management practices. Matthew currently works as a consultant for the Michigan Louis Stokes Alliance for Minority Participation as well as the Center for Socially Engaged Design and the Center for Education Design, Evaluation and Research.   Matthew continues to advocate for increased resources for non-traditional and minority students, as well as inspire those considering returning to college. Matthew frequently engages in public speaking, encouraging both young and old to pursue Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math professions. Matthew also works with a number of Fortune 500 organizations to improve their diversity recruitment and retention outcomes.   Matthew is a proud native Detroiter, and credits his success to early exposure to science and technology he received through Detroit Public Schools, as well as programs such as DAPCEP (Detroit Area Pre-College Engineering Program) and Generation of Promise. Matthew founded Orisa Design, a consulting firm that uses design principles to address organizational climate and culture issues. Matthew attends Northwest Unity Missionary Baptist Church, where he also serves as Trustee. Matthew and his beautiful wife Breanna, also a native Detroiter, have been married for eight years.   Connect with Matthew: Email: mnelson@orisadesign.com Twitter: @STEMLifestyle    Instagram: @TheSTEMLifestyle            LinkedIn:  www.linkedin.com/in/STEMLifestyle                                                                                                                                                                

This episode covers Cannabis Design, Science, Branding and Digital Marketing. We discuss the issues in researching cannabis science online, how design can be used to clarify your message and what digital marketing strategies can be used to find your ideal customer. Our guest is Charlie McElroy, Founder & Creative Officer of Goldleaf.

Six weeks ago I realized that we have not really dived deep into the topic of Permaculture I began this current series on Permaculture. So far we have completed part one, part two, part three and part four of this … Continue reading →

Four weeks ago I realized that we have not really dived deep into the topic of Permaculture I began this current series on Permaculture. So far we have completed part one, part two and part three of this series. If … Continue reading →

Three weeks ago I realized that we have not really dived deep into the topic of Permaculture I began this current series on Permaculture.  So far we have completed part one and part two of this series. If you have … Continue reading →

Headquartered in Singapore, Protiotype design science community is an open research lab and de-facto think-tank which tests ideas and serves as a proving ground for concepts with potential for industry adoption, scaling and commercialisation. Gregory Cornelius is the founder of Protiotype design science community and brings his expertise in web design, news corporation management and media to the new world of IoT, augmented reality and media and design.

Last week I realized that we have not really dived deep into the topic of Permaculture for a while so last Tuesday I did part one of this series.  If you have not listened to it you may want to … Continue reading →

We have not really dived deep into the topic of Permaculture for a while so we are going to do that today.  For those who have studied Permaculture for a while today might be just a bit remedial but I … Continue reading →

Today, Caleb sits down with Sean McDowell to talk about Intelligent Design

Hilary and Roger discuss Hilary's .Rprofile file, jury duty, R certification, and Chapter 6 of Nigel Cross's book Design Thinking. Show notes: DC R Conference Discount Code Design Discipline vs. Design Science by Nigel Cross Support us through our Patreon page Roger on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rdpeng Hilary on Twitter: https://twitter.com/hspter Get the Not So Standard Deviations book: https://leanpub.com/conversationsondatascience/ Subscribe to the podcast on Apple Podcasts: https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/not-so-standard-deviations/id1040614570 Subscribe to the podcast on Google Play: https://play.google.com/music/listen?u=0#/ps/Izfnbx6tlruojkfrvhjfdj3nmna Find past episodes: http://nssdeviations.com Contact us at nssdeviations@gmail.com

…on reflecting your life through your work. Illustrator and designer Margo Hurst describes her hours as “9 to 5 and 6 to 10,” working in-house at Design Science by day and creating posters and art by night. Her work is a visual diary, reflecting her life with an honest, distinctive style. She joins the podcast for a conversation about letting go of perfection, the challenge of drawing hands and finding the pinkest pink.

Episode three of the CreativeMornings Sheffield podcast features a talk by Patrick Walker, from Dust Collective, and Laura Higham, from FAI Farms. Patrick and Laura talk about how they’ve been collaborating to raise awareness and create real change for sustainable food production. Real thought-provoking stuff. CreativeMornings Sheffield: creativemornings.com/cities/shd Dust Collective: http://du.st FAI Farms: http://www.faifarms.com Sponsor... La Biblioteka: http://www.labiblioteka.co Partners... Make it Matte Black (video): http://makeitmatteblack.co.uk Very Meta (podcast): http://verymeta.com

Are you ready to take your UX design to the next level? Carl and Richard talk to Mark Miller about his latest research into the science of great design - and it's definitely a science! Mark walks through some core concepts related to user interface design and the design of the application as a whole, helping users stay focused on what they need to do without interrupting or confusing them along the way. The discussion also embraces a lot of design decisions in the non-digital world as well - how you walk and drive a car are impacted by the design of a number of things!Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/net-rocks/donations

Are you ready to take your UX design to the next level? Carl and Richard talk to Mark Miller about his latest research into the science of great design - and it's definitely a science! Mark walks through some core concepts related to user interface design and the design of the application as a whole, helping users stay focused on what they need to do without interrupting or confusing them along the way. The discussion also embraces a lot of design decisions in the non-digital world as well - how you walk and drive a car are impacted by the design of a number of things!Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/net-rocks/donations

I’ve been highlighting aspects of Design Thinking in several episodes and I continue with this episode that considers how idea generation can be improved using design heuristics. I discussed the topic with Seda Yilmaz,  a professor in the Department of Industrial Design at Iowa State University. She earned her PhD in Design Science from the University […]

I've been highlighting aspects of Design Thinking in several episodes and I continue with this episode that considers how idea generation can be improved using design heuristics. I discussed the topic with Seda Yilmaz,  a professor in the Department of Industrial Design at Iowa State University. She earned her PhD in Design Science from the University […]

In this podcast, Raphael Deluzio discusses the research he is conducting at the CI2 Lab, at the University of Southern Maine, which focuses on Design Science and Creative Intelligence.

No subject so sharply highlights the contrast between science and religion as evolution. Over 150 years ago Darwin wrote that all living things descended from one common ancestor through the process of natural selection. Later biologists found a mechanism for evolution in copying errors — or mutations — made during the reproductive process. But to […] The post Conversations Beyond Science and Religion – Is Intelligent Design Science? appeared first on WebTalkRadio.net.

This feature podcast is part of a series of interviews with science communicators about science communication. Today we are Speaking to… Lizzie Crouch Lizzie Crouch is a freelance science communicator working on a myriad of projects ranging from project managing Robert Winston’s website, to working to get designers and scientists to collaborate with the Design Science project. […]The post Speaking to…Lizzie Crouch appeared first on Speaking of Science » Podcast Feed.

Buckminster Fuller, inventor of the geodesic dome, was a futurist, technology visionary and explorer of the deepest principles at work in Nature. He considered himself to be a “comprehensive anticipatory design scientist,” and dedicated his life to making our modern civilization work – for all of humanity – and in harmony with the systems of the natural world. His work … Read more about this episode...

Fireflies, Dumpsters, Soft Power and the Design Science Revolution - The visionary designer and architect R. Buckminster Fullers remarkable legacy inspires new generations to create the Design Science Revolution he first called for in the 1960s. Elizabeth Thompson, executive director of the Buckminster Fuller Institute (BFI), brings to life Buckys vision, along with contemporary BFI Challenge Award recipients. Sheila Kennedy, Professor of Architecture at MIT, and John Edel, Director of the Chicago Sustainable Manufacturing Center, whose imaginative design innovations address humanitys most pressing problems.

One of the most difficult decisions I face in homeschooling is choosing a curriculum among the abundance of choices available. Ironically, it’s also one of the major “benefits” I see that Homeschooling offers! It is difficult for a few reasons. One is that I personally do best being able to put my hands on it […]

Hector Avalos, Prof. of Religious Studies, discusses Intelligent Design and the Gonzales tenure denial incident at ISU.