Podcast appearances and mentions of Sean Combs

A memorandum in support of a request for dismissal of a complaint is a legal document submitted to a court that outlines the reasons why a complaint should be dismissed. This type of memorandum is typically prepared by the defendant or their legal counsel and presented to the court as part of the pre-trial proceedings.In this document, the defendant usually provides legal arguments and evidence to support their request for dismissal. This could include demonstrating that the complaint fails to state a valid legal claim, that there is a lack of jurisdiction, or that there are other legal grounds for dismissal.The memorandum serves as a persuasive tool for the court, aiming to convince the judge that the complaint does not have merit and should not proceed to trial. It is important for the memorandum to be well-researched, clearly written, and supported by relevant legal precedent.In this episode we begin our look at the UMG memorandum in support of dismissing the complaint filed against them by Rodney Jones.   to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.41.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)

A memorandum in support of a request for dismissal of a complaint is a legal document submitted to a court that outlines the reasons why a complaint should be dismissed. This type of memorandum is typically prepared by the defendant or their legal counsel and presented to the court as part of the pre-trial proceedings.In this document, the defendant usually provides legal arguments and evidence to support their request for dismissal. This could include demonstrating that the complaint fails to state a valid legal claim, that there is a lack of jurisdiction, or that there are other legal grounds for dismissal.The memorandum serves as a persuasive tool for the court, aiming to convince the judge that the complaint does not have merit and should not proceed to trial. It is important for the memorandum to be well-researched, clearly written, and supported by relevant legal precedent.In this episode we begin our look at the UMG memorandum in support of dismissing the complaint filed against them by Rodney Jones.   to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.41.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)

The allegations that Sean "Puff Daddy" Combs is currently facing are not new to him.   In fact, he's been accused of things similar many times in the past.   Now, with the dam breaking and many accusers coming forward, for those of us who have followed the Jeffrey Epstein case, the similarities are very, very apparent and when looking at the way things have transpired since these most recent allegations have been made, it's not hard to follow the thread connecting these civil allegations and the current criminal ones.   In this episode we get a look at those allegations for ourselves and why this is looking like it's going to be a major RICO case against Sean "Puff Daddy" Combs.The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) is a United States federal law enacted in 1970 to combat organized crime. RICO targets individuals or groups involved in illegal enterprises, known as "racketeering activities," such as bribery, extortion, fraud, and money laundering.Key features of RICO include:Criminalization of Racketeering Activity: RICO makes it a federal crime to participate in, or conspire to participate in, the affairs of an enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity.Enterprise: RICO applies to both legitimate and illegitimate enterprises, including corporations, partnerships, and other associations.Pattern of Racketeering Activity: A pattern is established by engaging in at least two instances of racketeering activity within ten years.Consequences: Individuals convicted under RICO can face substantial fines, forfeiture of assets, and imprisonment for up to 20 years per racketeering count, with potential enhancements for multiple offenses.RICO has been used extensively against organized crime syndicates, such as the Mafia, but it has also been employed in cases involving various other criminal enterprises, including drug trafficking, securities fraud, and corruption. Prosecutors often use RICO to dismantle criminal organizations by targeting not only the individuals directly involved in criminal activities but also those who facilitate or benefit from them, such as leaders, associates, and even legitimate businesses linked to the enterprise.To successfully prosecute under RICO, prosecutors must demonstrate the existence of an enterprise engaged in a pattern of racketeering activity, as well as the defendant's involvement in that enterprise and its illegal activities. RICO has been praised for its effectiveness in dismantling criminal organizations but has also faced criticism for its broad scope and potential for abuse in certain cases.In this episode, we get a look at the amended complaint that has been filed by Rodney Jones.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.30.1.pdf (courtlistener.com)

The allegations that Sean "Puff Daddy" Combs is currently facing are not new to him.   In fact, he's been accused of things similar many times in the past.   Now, with the dam breaking and many accusers coming forward, for those of us who have followed the Jeffrey Epstein case, the similarities are very, very apparent and when looking at the way things have transpired since these most recent allegations have been made, it's not hard to follow the thread connecting these civil allegations and the current criminal ones.   In this episode we get a look at those allegations for ourselves and why this is looking like it's going to be a major RICO case against Sean "Puff Daddy" Combs.The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) is a United States federal law enacted in 1970 to combat organized crime. RICO targets individuals or groups involved in illegal enterprises, known as "racketeering activities," such as bribery, extortion, fraud, and money laundering.Key features of RICO include:Criminalization of Racketeering Activity: RICO makes it a federal crime to participate in, or conspire to participate in, the affairs of an enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity.Enterprise: RICO applies to both legitimate and illegitimate enterprises, including corporations, partnerships, and other associations.Pattern of Racketeering Activity: A pattern is established by engaging in at least two instances of racketeering activity within ten years.Consequences: Individuals convicted under RICO can face substantial fines, forfeiture of assets, and imprisonment for up to 20 years per racketeering count, with potential enhancements for multiple offenses.RICO has been used extensively against organized crime syndicates, such as the Mafia, but it has also been employed in cases involving various other criminal enterprises, including drug trafficking, securities fraud, and corruption. Prosecutors often use RICO to dismantle criminal organizations by targeting not only the individuals directly involved in criminal activities but also those who facilitate or benefit from them, such as leaders, associates, and even legitimate businesses linked to the enterprise.To successfully prosecute under RICO, prosecutors must demonstrate the existence of an enterprise engaged in a pattern of racketeering activity, as well as the defendant's involvement in that enterprise and its illegal activities. RICO has been praised for its effectiveness in dismantling criminal organizations but has also faced criticism for its broad scope and potential for abuse in certain cases.In this episode, we get a look at the amended complaint that has been filed by Rodney Jones.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.30.1.pdf (courtlistener.com)

Sean "Diddy" Combs, a prominent music mogul and entrepreneur, has faced multiple allegations of sexual assault spanning several decades. One such allegation involves a woman identified as Jane Doe, who claims she was assaulted by Combs during an event related to the MTV reality show Making the Band.BackgroundIn 2004, Jane Doe, then 19 years old, was a college student in Brooklyn. She met Combs during a promotional event for Making the Band, a reality show he produced that aimed to form a new music group.According to Jane Doe's lawsuit:Invitation to Hotel Room: Combs invited her and a friend to his hotel room in Manhattan under the pretense of discussing potential opportunities in the music industry.Unwanted Advances: Once in the room, Combs allegedly made unsolicited sexual advances, including inappropriate touching and attempts to kiss her.Physical Resistance: Jane Doe resisted his advances, leading to a physical struggle where she was reportedly pushed onto the bed.Assault: She alleges that Combs then sexually assaulted her despite her protests.Following the alleged incident, Jane Doe states she experienced significant emotional distress, including feelings of shame and humiliation. She also claims to have faced professional setbacks as a result of the assault.Jane Doe filed a lawsuit against Combs, seeking compensatory and punitive damages for the alleged assault. The case is currently pending in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New YorkThis allegation is part of a series of accusations against Combs, with multiple individuals coming forward with claims of sexual assault and misconduct. Combs has denied these allegations, and his legal team has stated that he intends to defend himself against these claims.(commercial at 7:57)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:combs-da-band-photoshoot-complaint.pdf

The allegations that Sean "Puff Daddy" Combs is currently facing are not new to him.   In fact, he's been accused of things similar many times in the past.   Now, with the dam breaking and many accusers coming forward, for those of us who have followed the Jeffrey Epstein case, the similarities are very, very apparent and when looking at the way things have transpired since these most recent allegations have been made, it's not hard to follow the thread connecting these civil allegations and the current criminal ones.   In this episode we get a look at those allegations for ourselves and why this is looking like it's going to be a major RICO case against Sean "Puff Daddy" Combs.The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) is a United States federal law enacted in 1970 to combat organized crime. RICO targets individuals or groups involved in illegal enterprises, known as "racketeering activities," such as bribery, extortion, fraud, and money laundering.Key features of RICO include:Criminalization of Racketeering Activity: RICO makes it a federal crime to participate in, or conspire to participate in, the affairs of an enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity.Enterprise: RICO applies to both legitimate and illegitimate enterprises, including corporations, partnerships, and other associations.Pattern of Racketeering Activity: A pattern is established by engaging in at least two instances of racketeering activity within ten years.Consequences: Individuals convicted under RICO can face substantial fines, forfeiture of assets, and imprisonment for up to 20 years per racketeering count, with potential enhancements for multiple offenses.RICO has been used extensively against organized crime syndicates, such as the Mafia, but it has also been employed in cases involving various other criminal enterprises, including drug trafficking, securities fraud, and corruption. Prosecutors often use RICO to dismantle criminal organizations by targeting not only the individuals directly involved in criminal activities but also those who facilitate or benefit from them, such as leaders, associates, and even legitimate businesses linked to the enterprise.To successfully prosecute under RICO, prosecutors must demonstrate the existence of an enterprise engaged in a pattern of racketeering activity, as well as the defendant's involvement in that enterprise and its illegal activities. RICO has been praised for its effectiveness in dismantling criminal organizations but has also faced criticism for its broad scope and potential for abuse in certain cases.In this episode, we get a look at the amended complaint that has been filed by Rodney Jones.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.30.1.pdf (courtlistener.com)

The allegations that Sean "Puff Daddy" Combs is currently facing are not new to him.   In fact, he's been accused of things similar many times in the past.   Now, with the dam breaking and many accusers coming forward, for those of us who have followed the Jeffrey Epstein case, the similarities are very, very apparent and when looking at the way things have transpired since these most recent allegations have been made, it's not hard to follow the thread connecting these civil allegations and the current criminal ones.   In this episode we get a look at those allegations for ourselves and why this is looking like it's going to be a major RICO case against Sean "Puff Daddy" Combs.The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) is a United States federal law enacted in 1970 to combat organized crime. RICO targets individuals or groups involved in illegal enterprises, known as "racketeering activities," such as bribery, extortion, fraud, and money laundering.Key features of RICO include:Criminalization of Racketeering Activity: RICO makes it a federal crime to participate in, or conspire to participate in, the affairs of an enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity.Enterprise: RICO applies to both legitimate and illegitimate enterprises, including corporations, partnerships, and other associations.Pattern of Racketeering Activity: A pattern is established by engaging in at least two instances of racketeering activity within ten years.Consequences: Individuals convicted under RICO can face substantial fines, forfeiture of assets, and imprisonment for up to 20 years per racketeering count, with potential enhancements for multiple offenses.RICO has been used extensively against organized crime syndicates, such as the Mafia, but it has also been employed in cases involving various other criminal enterprises, including drug trafficking, securities fraud, and corruption. Prosecutors often use RICO to dismantle criminal organizations by targeting not only the individuals directly involved in criminal activities but also those who facilitate or benefit from them, such as leaders, associates, and even legitimate businesses linked to the enterprise.To successfully prosecute under RICO, prosecutors must demonstrate the existence of an enterprise engaged in a pattern of racketeering activity, as well as the defendant's involvement in that enterprise and its illegal activities. RICO has been praised for its effectiveness in dismantling criminal organizations but has also faced criticism for its broad scope and potential for abuse in certain cases.In this episode, we get a look at the amended complaint that has been filed by Rodney Jones.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.30.1.pdf (courtlistener.com)

The allegations that Sean "Puff Daddy" Combs is currently facing are not new to him.   In fact, he's been accused of things similar many times in the past.   Now, with the dam breaking and many accusers coming forward, for those of us who have followed the Jeffrey Epstein case, the similarities are very, very apparent and when looking at the way things have transpired since these most recent allegations have been made, it's not hard to follow the thread connecting these civil allegations and the current criminal ones.   In this episode we get a look at those allegations for ourselves and why this is looking like it's going to be a major RICO case against Sean "Puff Daddy" Combs.The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) is a United States federal law enacted in 1970 to combat organized crime. RICO targets individuals or groups involved in illegal enterprises, known as "racketeering activities," such as bribery, extortion, fraud, and money laundering.Key features of RICO include:Criminalization of Racketeering Activity: RICO makes it a federal crime to participate in, or conspire to participate in, the affairs of an enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity.Enterprise: RICO applies to both legitimate and illegitimate enterprises, including corporations, partnerships, and other associations.Pattern of Racketeering Activity: A pattern is established by engaging in at least two instances of racketeering activity within ten years.Consequences: Individuals convicted under RICO can face substantial fines, forfeiture of assets, and imprisonment for up to 20 years per racketeering count, with potential enhancements for multiple offenses.RICO has been used extensively against organized crime syndicates, such as the Mafia, but it has also been employed in cases involving various other criminal enterprises, including drug trafficking, securities fraud, and corruption. Prosecutors often use RICO to dismantle criminal organizations by targeting not only the individuals directly involved in criminal activities but also those who facilitate or benefit from them, such as leaders, associates, and even legitimate businesses linked to the enterprise.To successfully prosecute under RICO, prosecutors must demonstrate the existence of an enterprise engaged in a pattern of racketeering activity, as well as the defendant's involvement in that enterprise and its illegal activities. RICO has been praised for its effectiveness in dismantling criminal organizations but has also faced criticism for its broad scope and potential for abuse in certain cases.In this episode, we get a look at the amended complaint that has been filed by Rodney Jones.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.30.1.pdf (courtlistener.com)

A  plaintiff identified as Jane Doe filed a lawsuit against Sean "Diddy" Combs, alleging sexual assault during her participation in the reality television show "Making the Band." Concurrently, she submitted a motion to proceed anonymously, citing concerns for her safety and privacy. Doe argued that revealing her identity could lead to harassment, public scrutiny, and potential professional repercussions, given Combs' prominence in the entertainment industry. She emphasized that anonymity was crucial to protect her mental health and personal well-being.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.630450.15.0_1.pdf

The allegations that Sean "Puff Daddy" Combs is currently facing are not new to him.   In fact, he's been accused of things similar many times in the past.   Now, with the dam breaking and many accusers coming forward, for those of us who have followed the Jeffrey Epstein case, the similarities are very, very apparent and when looking at the way things have transpired since these most recent allegations have been made, it's not hard to follow the thread connecting these civil allegations and the current criminal ones.   In this episode we get a look at those allegations for ourselves and why this is looking like it's going to be a major RICO case against Sean "Puff Daddy" Combs.The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) is a United States federal law enacted in 1970 to combat organized crime. RICO targets individuals or groups involved in illegal enterprises, known as "racketeering activities," such as bribery, extortion, fraud, and money laundering.Key features of RICO include:Criminalization of Racketeering Activity: RICO makes it a federal crime to participate in, or conspire to participate in, the affairs of an enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity.Enterprise: RICO applies to both legitimate and illegitimate enterprises, including corporations, partnerships, and other associations.Pattern of Racketeering Activity: A pattern is established by engaging in at least two instances of racketeering activity within ten years.Consequences: Individuals convicted under RICO can face substantial fines, forfeiture of assets, and imprisonment for up to 20 years per racketeering count, with potential enhancements for multiple offenses.RICO has been used extensively against organized crime syndicates, such as the Mafia, but it has also been employed in cases involving various other criminal enterprises, including drug trafficking, securities fraud, and corruption. Prosecutors often use RICO to dismantle criminal organizations by targeting not only the individuals directly involved in criminal activities but also those who facilitate or benefit from them, such as leaders, associates, and even legitimate businesses linked to the enterprise.To successfully prosecute under RICO, prosecutors must demonstrate the existence of an enterprise engaged in a pattern of racketeering activity, as well as the defendant's involvement in that enterprise and its illegal activities. RICO has been praised for its effectiveness in dismantling criminal organizations but has also faced criticism for its broad scope and potential for abuse in certain cases.In this episode, we get a look at the amended complaint that has been filed by Rodney Jones.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.30.1.pdf (courtlistener.com)

Sean "Diddy" Combs, a prominent music mogul and entrepreneur, has faced multiple allegations of sexual assault spanning several decades. One such allegation involves a woman identified as Jane Doe, who claims she was assaulted by Combs during an event related to the MTV reality show Making the Band.BackgroundIn 2004, Jane Doe, then 19 years old, was a college student in Brooklyn. She met Combs during a promotional event for Making the Band, a reality show he produced that aimed to form a new music group.According to Jane Doe's lawsuit:Invitation to Hotel Room: Combs invited her and a friend to his hotel room in Manhattan under the pretense of discussing potential opportunities in the music industry.Unwanted Advances: Once in the room, Combs allegedly made unsolicited sexual advances, including inappropriate touching and attempts to kiss her.Physical Resistance: Jane Doe resisted his advances, leading to a physical struggle where she was reportedly pushed onto the bed.Assault: She alleges that Combs then sexually assaulted her despite her protests.Following the alleged incident, Jane Doe states she experienced significant emotional distress, including feelings of shame and humiliation. She also claims to have faced professional setbacks as a result of the assault.Jane Doe filed a lawsuit against Combs, seeking compensatory and punitive damages for the alleged assault. The case is currently pending in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New YorkThis allegation is part of a series of accusations against Combs, with multiple individuals coming forward with claims of sexual assault and misconduct. Combs has denied these allegations, and his legal team has stated that he intends to defend himself against these claims.(commercial at 7:57)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:combs-da-band-photoshoot-complaint.pdf

The allegations that Sean "Puff Daddy" Combs is currently facing are not new to him.   In fact, he's been accused of things similar many times in the past.   Now, with the dam breaking and many accusers coming forward, for those of us who have followed the Jeffrey Epstein case, the similarities are very, very apparent and when looking at the way things have transpired since these most recent allegations have been made, it's not hard to follow the thread connecting these civil allegations and the current criminal ones.   In this episode we get a look at those allegations for ourselves and why this is looking like it's going to be a major RICO case against Sean "Puff Daddy" Combs.The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) is a United States federal law enacted in 1970 to combat organized crime. RICO targets individuals or groups involved in illegal enterprises, known as "racketeering activities," such as bribery, extortion, fraud, and money laundering.Key features of RICO include:Criminalization of Racketeering Activity: RICO makes it a federal crime to participate in, or conspire to participate in, the affairs of an enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity.Enterprise: RICO applies to both legitimate and illegitimate enterprises, including corporations, partnerships, and other associations.Pattern of Racketeering Activity: A pattern is established by engaging in at least two instances of racketeering activity within ten years.Consequences: Individuals convicted under RICO can face substantial fines, forfeiture of assets, and imprisonment for up to 20 years per racketeering count, with potential enhancements for multiple offenses.RICO has been used extensively against organized crime syndicates, such as the Mafia, but it has also been employed in cases involving various other criminal enterprises, including drug trafficking, securities fraud, and corruption. Prosecutors often use RICO to dismantle criminal organizations by targeting not only the individuals directly involved in criminal activities but also those who facilitate or benefit from them, such as leaders, associates, and even legitimate businesses linked to the enterprise.To successfully prosecute under RICO, prosecutors must demonstrate the existence of an enterprise engaged in a pattern of racketeering activity, as well as the defendant's involvement in that enterprise and its illegal activities. RICO has been praised for its effectiveness in dismantling criminal organizations but has also faced criticism for its broad scope and potential for abuse in certain cases.In this episode, we get a look at the amended complaint that has been filed by Rodney Jones.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.30.1.pdf (courtlistener.com)

50 Cent (Curtis Jackson) is the executive producer of a new, multi-part Netflix documentary about Sean "Diddy" Combs, titled "Sean Combs: The Reckoning," which examines Diddy's career, controversies, and recent legal issues, featuring exclusive footage from leading up to his arrest. 50 Cent stated he stepped up to produce it because no one else in hip-hop would, aiming to address the culture's silence despite his long-standing feud with Combs Early Career & Origins: The episode details Combs' origins in Harlem/Mount Vernon and how he transformed into "Puff Daddy," focusing on his early work as an intern and talent scout at Uptown Records.The City College Stampede: The documentary explores the tragic events of a 1991 charity basketball event at the College of the City of New York, organized by Combs and Heavy D, which resulted in the deaths of nine people in a stampede. The series implicates Combs' negligence and push for more attendees in the tragedy.Founding Bad Boy Records: Following his firing from Uptown Records, the episode covers Combs' co-founding of Bad Boy Records and the signing of The Notorious B.I.G. (Christopher Wallace), which launched the label into prominence.Early Allegations: The episode introduces early, disturbing allegations, including Joi Dickerson-Neal's claim that in 1991, Combs drugged and raped her, filmed the assault, and showed the footage to others at his partiesBad Boy vs. Death Row: The episode details how Sean Combs' Bad Boy Records flourished, creating intense competition with Suge Knight's Death Row Records, culminating in the East Coast/West Coast hip-hop feud.Tupac & Biggie Murders: It explores the lingering questions surrounding the murders of Tupac and Biggie, featuring insights from the former LAPD detectives who handled their cases.Allegations of Violence & Bribery: The docuseries examines past incidents, including a 1995 shooting where Combs allegedly tried to bribe someone to take the blame for a gun, and allegations from Keffe D (related to Tupac's murder) about Combs offering money for deaths.The 1991 Stampede: The documentary revisits the tragic 1991 basketball event at City College, where a stampede led to nine deaths, questioning Combs' responsibility for poor planning and insurance issues, notes Netflix.Combs' Own Footage: The series uses extensive personal footage of Combs, showing him documenting his life, as he strategizes with legal teams amidst new accusations, even as he faces the consequences of the recent hotel assault videoSean Combs: The Reckoning Episode 3, "Official Girl," focuses on Combs' post-Biggie era, linking his skyrocketing fame with alleged abusive relationships, particularly with his artists and partners like Kim Porter, and introducing disturbing sex performance claims from former sex worker Clayton Howard, while exploring his potential role in the Tupac/Biggie murders alongside Keefe D's allegations and how Combs allegedly profited from the chaos

WATCH NOW: https://youtu.be/hKfjXCYrUJcFamily… this episode is one of those ones.Join Our Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/WillieMooreJrLiveI sat down with my brother, Yung Joc, and we got REAL about what most people hide: embarrassment, humility, and the pressure of being seen.We talked about:• how the streets really end for most people• what cameras and platforms do to your emotions• why embarrassment can make you spiral… or make you grow• and how faith teaches you to pivot without losing yourselfIf you've been trying to protect your image more than you've been protecting your peace… this conversation is for you.✅ Subscribe & join the family

Sean "Diddy" Combs, a prominent music mogul and entrepreneur, has faced multiple allegations of sexual assault spanning several decades. One such allegation involves a woman identified as Jane Doe, who claims she was assaulted by Combs during an event related to the MTV reality show Making the Band.BackgroundIn 2004, Jane Doe, then 19 years old, was a college student in Brooklyn. She met Combs during a promotional event for Making the Band, a reality show he produced that aimed to form a new music group.According to Jane Doe's lawsuit:Invitation to Hotel Room: Combs invited her and a friend to his hotel room in Manhattan under the pretense of discussing potential opportunities in the music industry.Unwanted Advances: Once in the room, Combs allegedly made unsolicited sexual advances, including inappropriate touching and attempts to kiss her.Physical Resistance: Jane Doe resisted his advances, leading to a physical struggle where she was reportedly pushed onto the bed.Assault: She alleges that Combs then sexually assaulted her despite her protests.Following the alleged incident, Jane Doe states she experienced significant emotional distress, including feelings of shame and humiliation. She also claims to have faced professional setbacks as a result of the assault.Jane Doe filed a lawsuit against Combs, seeking compensatory and punitive damages for the alleged assault. The case is currently pending in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New YorkThis allegation is part of a series of accusations against Combs, with multiple individuals coming forward with claims of sexual assault and misconduct. Combs has denied these allegations, and his legal team has stated that he intends to defend himself against these claims.(commercial at 7:57)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:combs-da-band-photoshoot-complaint.pdf

Another day, another Diddy lawsuit to dive into...In Case 1:24-cv-08810, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, involves a plaintiff identified as John Doe, who has lodged serious allegations against Sean "Diddy" Combs and affiliated entities, including Bad Boy Entertainment Holdings, Inc. and Bad Boy Records LLC. The lawsuit is classified under personal injury, alleging harm that stems from Combs' actions and potentially those of his associates. The plaintiff has requested to proceed anonymously, reflecting concerns over privacy and safety due to the sensitive nature of the claims.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.632026.1.0.pdf

Another day, another Diddy lawsuit to dive into...In Case 1:24-cv-08810, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, involves a plaintiff identified as John Doe, who has lodged serious allegations against Sean "Diddy" Combs and affiliated entities, including Bad Boy Entertainment Holdings, Inc. and Bad Boy Records LLC. The lawsuit is classified under personal injury, alleging harm that stems from Combs' actions and potentially those of his associates. The plaintiff has requested to proceed anonymously, reflecting concerns over privacy and safety due to the sensitive nature of the claims.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.632026.1.0.pdf

In the on going battle being waged by Diddy in the courtroom, his victories have been far and few between.   However, in his lawsuit with "Miami John Doe", Judge Kaplan has ordered that his accuser will have to unmask himself if he wants to move forward with his lawsuit.   In this episode, we take a look at that order.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.632026.17.0.pdf

Kathy and Jim discuss the 50cent documentary entitled Sean Combs: The Reconing, about his reign of terror and the trail of destruction he has left behind. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

er and cultural critic Christiana Mbakwe Medina joins Question Everything to dissect the strange, shifting logic of our current moment, from the collapse of celebrity mystique to our obsession with wealth, power, and proximity to influence. Christiana and Danielle, explore why “cancel culture” doesn’t really cancel anyone, how pop culture functions as soft power, and why so many modern myths, from the tradwife fantasy to the American Dream, are starting to crack. They also look ahead to what 2026 might bring: a more irreverent cultural mood shaped by fear fatigue, AI, and a hunger for something that feels human. In this episode, you’ll learn: Why pop culture is a mirror of society, not a distraction from it How celebrity lost its mystique in the age of access and social media Why cancel culture rarely has lasting consequences Why Lauren Sánchez Bezos may be one of the most important power brokers in culture right now What the Diddy verdict reveals about power, fame, and forgiveness How and why powerful men are so often culturally forgiven What “soft power” really means—and how culture shapes politics more than we think Why we confuse wealth with moral worth How the American Dream functions more like a myth than a reality What the tradwife / “soft life” fantasy is really selling to burned-out women Why staying home is far harder and riskier than TikTok makes it look How AI is quietly reshaping creativity and culture already Why culture may be entering a more irreverent, punk era after years of fear and caution What’s actually changing about fame, influence, and the influencer economy Why celebrity apologies rarely work (and never really have) How we should think about aging, relevance, and cultural exits (including Beyoncé) What we’re misreading about power, gender, and modern ambition Follow Christiana on Instagram @christianaama, and don’t miss her Substack and podcast, Pop Syllabus. Book recommendation: The Warmth of Other Suns by Isabel Wilkerson Substack: https://popsyllabus.substack.com/ Podcast: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/pop-syllabus/id1866754314See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In 2025, rapper and producer Sean "Diddy" Combs was convicted on two counts of transportation for prostitution in a trial that captured the attention of the nation. But while Combs was acquitted of the more serious charges leveled against him, more people have come forward to share their experiences with the controversial figure. The new documentary series "Sean Combs: The Reckoning" provides an in-depth look at the life and career of Combs, going back to his roots in Harlem, his role in the East Coast/West Coast rap battles of the 1990s, and his alleged abuse of women throughout his life. Director Alexandria Stapleton discusses the documentary, which is available to stream now on Netflix.

Diddy scored a significant partial win in April Lampros's civil suit after a judge dismissed most of her claims—covering alleged rape, battery, and emotional distress from the 1990s—as time-barred by New York's statute of limitations and lacking sufficient factual detail. Additionally, any claims against Bad Boy Records and Sony Music were dropped, narrowing the legal firestorm to focus almost exclusively on Combs himself.What's left is a single active allegation under New York's Gender‑Motivated Violence Protection Law. Lampros claims that in late 2000 or early 2001, Combs physically grabbed her and tried to force himself on her—a moment she says she resisted. With that as the only surviving allegation, both parties are now entering discovery. Diddy's legal team sees the much narrower case as a major strategic win, while Lampros's attorney emphasizes that the remaining claim keeps her pursuit of accountability alive.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Diddy team claims legal win in April Lampros' sexual assault lawsuit

Sean "Diddy" Combs has filed a $100 million defamation lawsuit against NBCUniversal, Peacock TV, and Ample Entertainment, alleging that their documentary, "Diddy: The Making of a Bad Boy," contains false and malicious accusations. The lawsuit claims the documentary portrays Combs as a "monster" comparable to Jeffrey Epstein, accusing him of heinous crimes such as serial murder, rape of minors, and sex trafficking, without any credible evidence. Specific allegations include insinuations of Combs' involvement in the deaths of his ex-partner Kim Porter and rapper The Notorious B.I.G., as well as unfounded claims of sexual misconduct with minors. Combs' legal team argues that these baseless assertions have caused severe reputational and economic harm, and that the defendants prioritized sensationalism over journalistic integrity.The lawsuit emphasizes that the documentary advances unfounded conspiracy theories, relying on speculative interviews and discredited sources. Combs' attorneys assert that the defendants were aware of the falsehoods yet proceeded with broadcasting the documentary, thereby exploiting public interest for profit. They contend that this reckless dissemination of unverified information not only damages Combs' reputation but also jeopardizes his right to a fair trial, as he is currently awaiting trial on unrelated federal charges. Through this legal action, Combs seeks to hold the defendants accountable for the substantial harm caused by their actions.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Diddy launches $100m lawsuit against NBCUniversal over documentary... ahead of sex trafficking trial | Daily Mail Online

Another day, another Diddy lawsuit to dive into...In Case 1:24-cv-08810, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, involves a plaintiff identified as John Doe, who has lodged serious allegations against Sean "Diddy" Combs and affiliated entities, including Bad Boy Entertainment Holdings, Inc. and Bad Boy Records LLC. The lawsuit is classified under personal injury, alleging harm that stems from Combs' actions and potentially those of his associates. The plaintiff has requested to proceed anonymously, reflecting concerns over privacy and safety due to the sensitive nature of the claims.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.632026.1.0.pdf

This week, Jordan, Darrell, and Anthony discuss the documentary series "Sean Combs: The Reckoning" and review the latest Knives Out movie, "Wake Up Dead Man."(If you notice a few seemingly outdated references to the holiday season, we recorded this in December, but Anthony failed to finish editing until now!)If you'd like to skip ahead, here's how the episode breaks down:0:00 Intro0:37 Sean Combs: The Reckoning discussion25:58 Wake Up Dead Man review41:20 Wake Up Dead Man spoiler discussion

In which Yer Boys review: Tanks and dedication to the role; Swords and sorcery and hot chicks; Scary clowns and prequels. Plus: Lake Jackson Lore and doing dirty honestly; doing the job no matter what; The dangers of being Diddy and why you should never take Curtis Jackson shopping; STREET FIGHTER TRAILER; Swapping logs with DAFFY DOOK

Welcome back for Episode 116 of The kPodcast! Today we'll be discussing some recent life updates & projects, my recent travels for the holidays, as well as new music from Mobb Deep, Tame Impala, Travis Barker, Hermanos Gutierrez & Jack Johnson, Khruangbin, Big KRIT, Nas & DJ Premier, and Pink Floyd. We're also going to be discussing Outkast being inducted into the Hall Of Fame, Cardo Got Wings being the leading platinum producer in hip-hop twice in a row, Robert Plant's NPR Tiny Desk performance, Comethazine rebranding into Frank Kole, J. Cole rolling out The Fall Off, Netflix's new documentary on Sean Combs, some new movies to check out, the NFL playoffs underway, Chauncey Billups caught up in a gambling situation, giant lizards taking over Florida, Americans protesting over Trump's presidency, the United States removing Venezuela's president from office, and AI content on the rise while becoming scarily realistic. Thank you so much for listening and please be sure to email therealkpodcast@gmail.com with any feedback, comments, suggestions, and/or questions! Also be sure to follow the show on socials @therealkpodcast

Burnz, VSOP, and Maxlo break down the documentary scene by scene, discussing the most shocking moments, key revelations, and unanswered questions surrounding one of hip hop's most powerful figures. We debate what the film got right, what felt one-sided, and what it means for Puff Daddy's legacy and hip hop culture as a whole. From power dynamics to accountability, media narratives, and the role of 50 Cent behind the scenes, this episode delivers a thoughtful, unfiltered conversation on one of the most talked-about hip hop docs in recent memory.Tap in, watch the debate unfold, and let us know where you stand.Puff Daddy documentary, The Reckoning Netflix, 50 Cent executive producer, Puff Daddy controversy, hip hop documentary review, GAHHDcast, hip hop debate podcast, Bad Boy Records history, Puff Daddy legacy, hip hop media analysis, rap culture discussion, hip hop news podcast, Netflix hip hop documentaries#PuffDaddy#TheReckoning#50Cent#HipHopDocumentary#GAHHDcast#HipHopDebate#RapCulture#BadBoyRecords#HipHopPodcast

Linktree: ⁠https://linktr.ee/Analytic⁠Join The Normandy For Additional Bonus Audio And Visual Content For All Things Nme+! Join Here: ⁠https://ow.ly/msoH50WCu0K⁠Join analytic dreamz on THE NOTORIOUS MASS EFFECT EPISODE 156 as he dives deep into whether Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 is the greatest game of all time after sweeping Game of the Year and eight other awards at The Game Awards 2025, including Best Narrative, Best Art Direction, Best Score and Music, Best RPG, Best Game Direction, Best Independent Game, Best Debut Indie Game, and Best Performance.Music Breakdown:21 Savage's latest drops and impact on the chartsTito Double P & Peso Pluma's rising collaboration heatPooh Shiesty's comeback tracks dominating playlistsEsedee's fresh sound shaking up the underground sceneIndustry News Updates:Netflix's blockbuster $82.7 billion acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery's streaming and studios division, including HBO Max and major franchises, shaking Hollywood amid the ongoing separation of Discovery GlobalBillboard's ongoing chart controversies amid YouTube pulling streaming data starting January 16, 2026 over disputes on ad-supported versus paid stream weightingFull recap of The Game Awards 2025 winners, with Expedition 33's record nine trophies leading the packFallout Season 2's weekly Prime Video drops heating up with record Rotten Tomatoes scores of 97% critic approval and strong audience love, plus New Vegas teasesGaming Deep Dives:Diablo IV's Season 11 overhaul with itemization revamps, Toughness system changes, the Tower endgame dungeon beta, Divine Gifts, and leaderboard returnsCS2's latest patches, winter rostermania roster shakes including major team rebuilds, and map updatesWhiteout Survival mobile's survival strategy meta, hero rallies with Generations 12-14 dominating, alliance showdowns, and frozen apocalypse gameplayKirby and the Forgotten Land's Nintendo Switch 2 Edition with Star-Crossed World expansion, enhanced resolution and frame rates, new Mouthful Modes, and upgraded 3D platforming adventureDrama Breakdowns:Call of Duty vs. Battlefield 6 player count wars, with BF6 topping early U.S. sales and Steam peaks but CoD reclaiming console engagement dominanceDiddy vs. 50 Cent's decades-long feud exploding with 50's Netflix docuseries Sean Combs: The Reckoning amid Diddy's prison stint and ongoing allegationsBillboard vs. YouTube chart data standoff, with YouTube withdrawing streams over weighting disputes set to reshape Hot 100 rankingsEbro vs. Drake beef reignites with leaked DMs including "Die slower pussy" after Ebro's Hot 97 show cancellation and public shotsTune in now for analytic dreamz's unfiltered takes on music, industry shifts, gaming metas, and the hottest beefs shaking entertainment. Stream THE NOTORIOUS MASS EFFECT EPISODE 156 wherever you get your podcasts.Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/analytic-dreamz-notorious-mass-effect/donationsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Linktree: ⁠https://linktr.ee/Analytic⁠Join The Normandy For Additional Bonus Audio And Visual Content For All Things Nme+! Join Here: ⁠https://ow.ly/msoH50WCu0K⁠Join analytic dreamz on THE NOTORIOUS MASS EFFECT EPISODE 156 as he dives deep into whether Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 is the greatest game of all time after sweeping Game of the Year and eight other awards at The Game Awards 2025, including Best Narrative, Best Art Direction, Best Score and Music, Best RPG, Best Game Direction, Best Independent Game, Best Debut Indie Game, and Best Performance.Music Breakdown:21 Savage's latest drops and impact on the chartsTito Double P & Peso Pluma's rising collaboration heatPooh Shiesty's comeback tracks dominating playlistsEsedee's fresh sound shaking up the underground scene Industry News Updates:Netflix's blockbuster $82.7 billion acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery's streaming and studios division, including HBO Max and major franchises, shaking Hollywood amid the ongoing separation of Discovery GlobalBillboard's ongoing chart controversies amid YouTube pulling streaming data starting January 16, 2026 over disputes on ad-supported versus paid stream weightingFull recap of The Game Awards 2025 winners, with Expedition 33's record nine trophies leading the packFallout Season 2's weekly Prime Video drops heating up with record Rotten Tomatoes scores of 97% critic approval and strong audience love, plus New Vegas teases Gaming Deep Dives:Diablo IV's Season 11 overhaul with itemization revamps, Toughness system changes, the Tower endgame dungeon beta, Divine Gifts, and leaderboard returnsCS2's latest patches, winter rostermania roster shakes including major team rebuilds, and map updatesWhiteout Survival mobile's survival strategy meta, hero rallies with Generations 12-14 dominating, alliance showdowns, and frozen apocalypse gameplayKirby and the Forgotten Land's Nintendo Switch 2 Edition with Star-Crossed World expansion, enhanced resolution and frame rates, new Mouthful Modes, and upgraded 3D platforming adventure Drama Breakdowns:Call of Duty vs. Battlefield 6 player count wars, with BF6 topping early U.S. sales and Steam peaks but CoD reclaiming console engagement dominanceDiddy vs. 50 Cent's decades-long feud exploding with 50's Netflix docuseries Sean Combs: The Reckoning amid Diddy's prison stint and ongoing allegationsBillboard vs. YouTube chart data standoff, with YouTube withdrawing streams over weighting disputes set to reshape Hot 100 rankingsEbro vs. Drake beef reignites with leaked DMs including "Die slower pussy" after Ebro's Hot 97 show cancellation and public shots Tune in now for analytic dreamz's unfiltered takes on music, industry shifts, gaming metas, and the hottest beefs shaking entertainment. Stream THE NOTORIOUS MASS EFFECT EPISODE 156 wherever you get your podcasts.Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/analytic-dreamz-notorious-mass-effect/donationsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

​On April 1, 2025, plaintiff Manzaro Joseph filed a federal lawsuit in the Southern District of Florida against Sean "Diddy" Combs and several associates, including Eric Mejias, Brendan Paul, Emilio Estefan, and Adria English. The complaint alleges that the defendants participated in a criminal enterprise involving human trafficking, sexual exploitation, kidnapping, and obstruction of justice. Joseph claims he was drugged, transported across state lines, and subjected to sexual violence orchestrated by Combs, with assistance from the other named individuals. The lawsuit invokes federal statutes such as the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPRA), the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), and the Civil Rights Act, as well as Florida's human trafficking laws.The complaint details each defendant's alleged role: Mejias is accused of drugging and threatening Joseph; Paul of coordinating transportation; Estefan of facilitating and approving the transport; and English of aiding in Joseph's targeting and concealment. Joseph also references unidentified individuals ("DOE Johns") who may have contributed to the alleged crimes. He seeks damages and injunctive relief, asserting that the defendants' actions violated multiple federal and state laws. The case brings renewed scrutiny to Combs, who has faced previous legal challenges, and raises questions about the involvement of high-profile individuals in alleged criminal activities.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.flsd.686843.1.0.pdf

​On April 1, 2025, plaintiff Manzaro Joseph filed a federal lawsuit in the Southern District of Florida against Sean "Diddy" Combs and several associates, including Eric Mejias, Brendan Paul, Emilio Estefan, and Adria English. The complaint alleges that the defendants participated in a criminal enterprise involving human trafficking, sexual exploitation, kidnapping, and obstruction of justice. Joseph claims he was drugged, transported across state lines, and subjected to sexual violence orchestrated by Combs, with assistance from the other named individuals. The lawsuit invokes federal statutes such as the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPRA), the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), and the Civil Rights Act, as well as Florida's human trafficking laws.The complaint details each defendant's alleged role: Mejias is accused of drugging and threatening Joseph; Paul of coordinating transportation; Estefan of facilitating and approving the transport; and English of aiding in Joseph's targeting and concealment. Joseph also references unidentified individuals ("DOE Johns") who may have contributed to the alleged crimes. He seeks damages and injunctive relief, asserting that the defendants' actions violated multiple federal and state laws. The case brings renewed scrutiny to Combs, who has faced previous legal challenges, and raises questions about the involvement of high-profile individuals in alleged criminal activities.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.flsd.686843.1.0.pdf

​On April 1, 2025, plaintiff Manzaro Joseph filed a federal lawsuit in the Southern District of Florida against Sean "Diddy" Combs and several associates, including Eric Mejias, Brendan Paul, Emilio Estefan, and Adria English. The complaint alleges that the defendants participated in a criminal enterprise involving human trafficking, sexual exploitation, kidnapping, and obstruction of justice. Joseph claims he was drugged, transported across state lines, and subjected to sexual violence orchestrated by Combs, with assistance from the other named individuals. The lawsuit invokes federal statutes such as the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPRA), the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), and the Civil Rights Act, as well as Florida's human trafficking laws.The complaint details each defendant's alleged role: Mejias is accused of drugging and threatening Joseph; Paul of coordinating transportation; Estefan of facilitating and approving the transport; and English of aiding in Joseph's targeting and concealment. Joseph also references unidentified individuals ("DOE Johns") who may have contributed to the alleged crimes. He seeks damages and injunctive relief, asserting that the defendants' actions violated multiple federal and state laws. The case brings renewed scrutiny to Combs, who has faced previous legal challenges, and raises questions about the involvement of high-profile individuals in alleged criminal activities.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.flsd.686843.1.0.pdf

Ghislaine Maxwell pleaded with the court for a lighter sentence by casting herself as a peripheral figure rather than a central architect of Jeffrey Epstein's trafficking operation. In her sentencing submission, she emphasized personal hardship, age, and family circumstances, portraying herself as someone who had already suffered enough through incarceration and public vilification. Her lawyers argued that she was being unfairly scapegoated for Epstein's crimes, stressing that she was not the primary beneficiary of the abuse and did not deserve a punishment that mirrored his notoriety. The plea leaned heavily on mitigation, urging the court to view her conduct as limited in scope and influence. It was a strategy aimed at shrinking her role, reframing years of recruitment and grooming as overblown or mischaracterized. The underlying message was clear: punish her, but gently.The court, however, was presented with a record that clashed sharply with that narrative. Prosecutors laid out evidence showing Maxwell's sustained, hands-on involvement in identifying, grooming, and delivering minors to Epstein, arguing that without her, the operation would not have functioned as it did. Her plea for leniency rang hollow against testimony from survivors who described coercion, manipulation, and lasting trauma. The attempt to recast herself as marginal only underscored the lack of accountability that defined her role for years. In asking for mercy, Maxwell avoided acknowledging the depth of harm or her abuse of power, focusing instead on her own discomfort and future prospects. The court ultimately rejected the premise of her appeal for leniency, concluding that the severity and duration of her conduct demanded a substantial sentence, not a reduced one.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

2:37 - The News 8:18 - Words Chris Hates 10:15 - Jerks of the Week 21:02 - The Man Who Wasn't There 24:52 - The Piano Teacher 27:13 - The Cat's Meow 30:10 - Zoolander 35:36 - Catch Me If You Can 37:33 - Capturing the Friedmans 40:00 - A Christmas Prince 41:12 - Bad Boys II 43:29 - Hundreds of Beavers 44:04 - Haha, You Clowns 45:08 - Wake Up Dead Man: A Knives Out Mystery 50:47 - The Treasure of Foggy Mountain 53:25 - Reflection in a Dead Diamond 56:03 - 10 Cloverfield Lane 58:06 - Killstreak 58:59 - Hit Man 1:00:23 - The Running Man (2025) 1:02:44 - the wrong P Diddy documentary 1:05:24 - Uzumaki 1:06:25 - Roofman 1:08:02 - Commando 1:09:18 - Santa Claus Is Coming to Town 1:12:06 - Superbad 1:13:14 - Van Wilder 1:27:43 - Van Wilder 2: The Rise of Taj 1:35:01 - Cyborg Cop 2 1:41:45 - Bloodfist

Episode Notes Gregs omnipotent predictions strike again! to called out Onision 14 years ago and P Diddy back in 2020! who's next? Greg's Onision vlog: [https://youtu.be/sHf0wAYIWMA?si=JYkLBU6FTEOCttlo ]( Support Zeitguys by contributing to their tip jar: https://tips.pinecast.com/jar/zeitguys Find out more at https://zeitguys.pinecast.co

(Season 3: Episode 10)We're closing out Season 3 the only way The Burner Syndicate knows how: loud takes, sharp debates, and a little chaos

00:00 — “I believed him.” Why believing in someone else's dream cost Roger his own.00:12 — When loyalty kills the dream How misplaced loyalty gives others control over your life.00:26 — Being added to Cassie's lawsuit The moment that forced Roger to speak — and why he stayed silent for years.00:40 — “I won't let anyone do that to my mother, sister, or daughter.”00:45 — Nine years with Diddy & prison time How loyalty, proximity, and survival shaped his choices.00:51 — Why most people didn't speak up00:58 — The biggest lesson from business, Puff, SR Boyz, and the streets Setting the stage for the full interview.01:20 — Ash Cash transition to sponsor message02:23 — Welcome to Inside the Vault Introducing Roger Bonds: high-level sales strategist, cultural marketer, former head of security, and leader of SR Boy South.02:35 — Who is Roger Bonds? Marketing, culture, influence, distribution, and street-level execution.03:14 — How products actually move & why trust converts to sales04:03 — Early years: Harlem, street influence & business lessons How the block became the foundation for brand domination.05:03 — Applying street marketing to corporate sales Understanding competition, consistency, and consumer behavior.06:04 — How SR Boy South was built Why Roger created a national network of B- and C-level influencers.08:01 — The conversation with Diddy that sparked SR Boy South09:23 — Multi-city expansion: Atlanta, Philly, Jersey, NYC, California10:21 — Roger's 10 years as Diddy's head of security The transition from security to brand ambassador.11:04 — Diabetes as the strategic exit Using illness as the only safe way to leave the situation.11:52 — When admiration for Puff faded Watching the shift from hero to hardship.12:52 — The second wind of fame & repeating toxic cycles13:57 — Behind the scenes: leaving quietly to survive financially14:55 — Sponsor message #215:44 — Public backlash: “Why is Barnes talking?” Losing friends and dealing with street opinions.17:01 — Why Cassie naming him changed everything “They don't know what I know.”18:09 — God's push to speak up now19:08 — The truth about the Cassie incident What really happened that night on Sunset Blvd.20:26 — Why nobody else's name was in the lawsuit21:10 — Loyalty, promises & broken trust22:00 — Roger's son in Africa The devastating story: wrongful charge, no evidence, 13 years awaiting trial.23:45 — Puff's broken promises to help24:53 — “I believed him.” How loyalty blinded his self-belief.25:50 — The power imbalance & why speaking mattered27:01 — Lack of credit for SR Boyz success Millions of cases sold — with no acknowledgment.28:21 — Puff's jealousy When the student becomes a threat.29:35 — Booking fees, disrespect, and the “I made you” moment31:04 — Street credibility vs corporate manipulation32:51 — Life lessons from the 20-year experience “Put yourself first.”34:10 — Blind loyalty vs strategic loyalty What he teaches the youth today.35:31 — Signs of character we ignore36:05 — Corporate gangsters vs street gangsters How to survive emotionally in business.37:40 — How faith helped him transition from rage to restraint38:54 — “If Puff called me today…” What Roger would say.40:06 — The future: domestic violence advocacy, anger management, certification work Turning pain into purpose.41:14 — Speaking to men: self-belief as a survival tool42:06 — Speaking to women: the “Cassie problem” & self-worth43:17 — How people sacrifice their dreams without realizing it44:12 — Legacy: what Roger wants his daughter to know45:06 — Why the streets are over46:10 — Ash Cash on Bonds' legacy beyond the Diddy story47:17 — Why this book is different Lessons + story = transformation.48:23 — Global interest: Russia, France, Italy & more49:15 — Publishing details: Amazon, Barnes & Noble, Walmart, Target50:10 — The audiobook is coming50:30 — Where to follow Roger Bonds IG: @TheRealRogerBonds FB: Roger Bonds YouTube: RogerBonds531751:09 — Closing the Vault Follow Inside the Vault: @InsideTheVault Follow Ash Cash: @IAmAshCash Join the Abundance Community.Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

​The U.S. government's motions in limine in the case against Sean "Diddy" Combs seek to shape the evidentiary landscape for the upcoming trial. Prosecutors aim to introduce corroborative materials such as text messages, diary entries from a former employee, and a 911 call to support the testimonies of alleged victims. They argue that these pieces of evidence are crucial to demonstrate patterns of behavior and to counter anticipated challenges to the credibility of witnesses. Additionally, the government requests the exclusion of certain defense evidence, including prior consensual sexual encounters Combs had with individuals not involved in the case, asserting that such information is irrelevant and could mislead the jury.Furthermore, the prosecution seeks to admit expert testimony from psychologist Dr. Dawn Hughes, who would explain how victims of abuse might remain in relationships with their abusers due to emotional manipulation or fear. This testimony is intended to provide context for the victims' continued association with Combs, which the defense might use to question their credibility. The motions also address the admissibility of a 2016 surveillance video allegedly showing Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. The defense contests this video's inclusion, claiming it has been altered and lacks authenticityto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.260.0_1.pdf

​The U.S. government's motions in limine in the case against Sean "Diddy" Combs seek to shape the evidentiary landscape for the upcoming trial. Prosecutors aim to introduce corroborative materials such as text messages, diary entries from a former employee, and a 911 call to support the testimonies of alleged victims. They argue that these pieces of evidence are crucial to demonstrate patterns of behavior and to counter anticipated challenges to the credibility of witnesses. Additionally, the government requests the exclusion of certain defense evidence, including prior consensual sexual encounters Combs had with individuals not involved in the case, asserting that such information is irrelevant and could mislead the jury.Furthermore, the prosecution seeks to admit expert testimony from psychologist Dr. Dawn Hughes, who would explain how victims of abuse might remain in relationships with their abusers due to emotional manipulation or fear. This testimony is intended to provide context for the victims' continued association with Combs, which the defense might use to question their credibility. The motions also address the admissibility of a 2016 surveillance video allegedly showing Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. The defense contests this video's inclusion, claiming it has been altered and lacks authenticityto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.260.0_1.pdf

​The U.S. government's motions in limine in the case against Sean "Diddy" Combs seek to shape the evidentiary landscape for the upcoming trial. Prosecutors aim to introduce corroborative materials such as text messages, diary entries from a former employee, and a 911 call to support the testimonies of alleged victims. They argue that these pieces of evidence are crucial to demonstrate patterns of behavior and to counter anticipated challenges to the credibility of witnesses. Additionally, the government requests the exclusion of certain defense evidence, including prior consensual sexual encounters Combs had with individuals not involved in the case, asserting that such information is irrelevant and could mislead the jury.Furthermore, the prosecution seeks to admit expert testimony from psychologist Dr. Dawn Hughes, who would explain how victims of abuse might remain in relationships with their abusers due to emotional manipulation or fear. This testimony is intended to provide context for the victims' continued association with Combs, which the defense might use to question their credibility. The motions also address the admissibility of a 2016 surveillance video allegedly showing Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. The defense contests this video's inclusion, claiming it has been altered and lacks authenticityto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.260.0_1.pdf

This week on the Mr. Throwback Thursday Podcast,we bring you if the Ramones were hip hop, the big guy squashing the little guy, Ice-T out of the weed business, Diddy not paying employees, Big Willy hits back, the Reverend Earl, new music from Mikey D, and a new single from Salt (minus Pepa). What else? Let's listen. Hip Hop High School Goliath Wins Again   Grand Opening, Grand Closing Speaking of ICE Working for Free? Will Strikes Back Pop Art Purchase Reverend Earl New School News   Wu Newsa. RZA-I b. Protect Yo Dad One and Done – The Wascals Record of the Week – Mikey D “Pop-n-Kim: Legends Don't Die” Artist of the Month – Madd Hatta  Old to the New – Cheryl “Salt” James “Kings & Queens” Bill Reads Lyrics And don’t forget to get over to Super7.com/MrThrowbackThursday ! Check us out on social media. Instagram: @mrthrowbackthursday | @bill_mr_tbtThreads: @mrthrowbackthursday | @bill_mr_tbtX (Twitter): @THE_Mr_TBT | @bill_mr_tbt Facebook: Mr. Throwback ThursdayYouTube: @mrtbt

Brittany Murphy, the talented actress known for Clueless, Girl, Interrupted, 8 Mile, and Uptown Girls, died at age 32 on December 20, 2009, in her Hollywood Hills home from accidental pneumonia, severe anemia, and prescription drug intoxication. Five months later, her husband Simon Monjack died in the same house from nearly identical causes. Official investigations ruled both deaths accidental and preventable, with no evidence of foul play, illegal drugs, toxic mold, or poisoning. Despite this, speculation continues around toxic mold, heavy metal poisoning (based on a disputed hair test), Sharon Murphy's possible role (as Brittany's devoted mother, sole heir, and close companion to Simon after the death), the home's eerie history (previous owners Madonna and Britney Spears reported unsettling “haunted” experiences), and even far-fetched links to Sean “P Diddy” Combs. As of 2026, experts maintain the deaths were tragic coincidences due to untreated illness and self-medication, with no credible evidence supporting conspiracy theories.   This episode supports The Branch of Hope Foundation January 2025 sponsored charity: The Honey & Barry Sherman Legacy Foundation -  A charitable organization established in 2020 by their daughter Alex Krawczyk to honor the memory and continue the philanthropic vision of Barry Sherman, the founder of Apotex, and his wife Honey, following their tragic deaths in 2017. Its primary purpose is to support charitable organizations focused on healthcare equity, human rights, scientific education and research, and Jewish community institutions, thereby furthering the couple's unfinished philanthropic aims. The foundation directs grants to initiatives that improve lives, advance medical care and accessibility (such as donations to hospitals and vision care programs), promote scientific discovery, and strengthen community organizations. By building on the Shermans' long-standing commitment to giving it creates a lasting legacy of impactful philanthropy.   Sources: Chubb, H., & Krauser, E. (2025, December 20). What Happened to Brittany Murphy's Home After Her Death? Inside the Dark History Behind the Hollywood Hills Mansion. People.com. https://people.com/what-happened-to-brittany-murphy-home-11873759 Sean Combs: The Reckoning - Netflix. (n.d.). https://www.netflix.com/title/81906780 Sager, J., & Rudolph, C. (2025, December 20). Brittany Murphy's death, 16 years later: revisiting her sudden passing and the questions that still linger. People.com. https://people.com/brittany-murphy-death-everything-to-know-11871547 ABC News. (2010, July 28). Brittany Murphy and husband Simon Monjack died of similar causes. https://abcnews.go.com/Health/Wellness/murphy-monjack-twin-deaths-mystery-mold-coroner/story?id=11259720 Tron, G. (2023, December 26). Three persistent rumors circulating since Brittany Murphy's mysterious death. Oxygen. https://www.oxygen.com/true-crime-buzz/three-rumors-circulating-since-brittany-murphys-death Inside the theories surrounding Brittany Murphy's tragic passing, exactly 16 years on. (n.d.). https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/inside-the-theories-surrounding-brittany-murphys-tragic-passing-exactly-16-years-on/ar-AA1SIJOA ABC News. (2010, July 28). Brittany Murphy and husband Simon Monjack died of similar causes. https://abcnews.go.com/Health/Wellness/murphy-monjack-twin-deaths-mystery-mold-coroner/story?id=11259720 Join The Dark Oak Discussion: Patreon The Dark Oak Podcast Website Facebook Instagram Twitter TikTok Youtube This episode of The Dark Oak was created, researched, written, recorded, hosted, edited, published, and marketed by Cynthia and Stefanie of Just Us Gals Productions with artwork by Justyse Himes and Music by Ryan Creep  

Go to https://www.squarespace.com/BOBANDSHERI to save 10% off your first purchase of a website or domain using code BOBANDSHERI.   Sheri is Melting. Morons in the News. The Best People Ever.   Everyone Needs a Laugh. Lamar watches “The Substance” Diddy has to Sell Private Jets.   Talkback Callers. Can You Believe This? Jury Duty.   From the Vault. Don’t Put That There.

The Netflix series Sean Combs: The Reckoning uses powerful interviews and behind-the-scenes footage to tell Sean “Puffy” Combs' story from restless kid to federal defendant. In this episode of You Can't Make This Up, host Rebecca Lavoie interviews former business partner Kirk Burrowes about what it was like to build a record label with Combs and his reaction to the hit documentary. SPOILER ALERT! If you haven't watched Sean Combs: The Reckoning yet, make sure to add it to your watch-list before listening on.  Dig deeper into all of your favorite Netflix documentaries and films at tudum.com.  Check our true crime hub at tudum.com/truecrime. Listen to more from Netflix Podcasts. 

Showbiz News: Danial Stern, Barry Manilow, Diddy, Keifer Sutherland, and more by 102.9 The Hog

California feels like a shoreline at dusk. Beautiful on the surface. Unsettled underneath. The tide keeps pulling back, exposing questions most people are told not to ask.In Episode 120 of ALLSMITH, Bryce sits down with Phil Mauriello Jr., attorney and host of California Underground, for a wide ranging conversation exploring power, policy, conspiracies, and the patterns shaping modern life.This is not a conversation about left versus right.It is a conversation about awareness versus autopilot.Together, Bryce and Phil explore California as a microcosm for the world. A state that often feels less governed and more tested. Policies roll out like experiments. Narratives change faster than outcomes. Citizens are left trying to reconcile intention with impact.Like standing inside a maze where every wall is painted with good intentions, this episode asks a simple but unsettling question.Are we being led, or are we being studied?From California politics to global power structures, this conversation moves through some of the most controversial topics of our time, not to provoke fear, but to sharpen discernment.⸻Topics Explored• The lingering unanswered questions surrounding 9/11.• The cultural flashpoint moments and assassination narratives surrounding Charlie Kirk.• The relationship between the United States and Israel, and how foreign policy shapes domestic life.• Antarctica, and why powerful nations are deeply interested in what lies beneath the ice.• Venezuela as a case study in government control, collapse, and currency manipulation.• The JFK files and what delayed truth reveals about institutions.• The COVID pandemic and how emergency powers reshape society long after the crisis fades.• Cloud seeding, weather modification, and where science ends and speculation begins.• George Soros and Bill Gates as symbols of influence, philanthropy, and fear.• The Epstein files and the erosion of public trust in accountability.• The Diddy trials and the intersection of celebrity, power, silence, and leverage.⸻Episode Time Stamps• 00:00 Opening reflections and why this conversation matters now.• 06:12 California as a political testing ground.• 14:45 Power, incentives, and narrative control.• 24:30 9/11, JFK files, and delayed truth.• 35:10 COVID, emergency powers, and long term consequences.• 46:20 Global influence, Israel, Venezuela, and Antarctica.• 58:40 Epstein, celebrity power, and institutional silence.• 01:10:15 Mindset, discernment, and personal responsibility.• 01:22:00 Final reflections on truth seeking and sovereignty.⸻Join the ALLSMITH CommunityIf this episode resonates, you are already part of the conversation.ALLSMITH is not about certainty.It is about pursuit.Pursuit of clarity. Strength. Agency. And peak expression.Ways to connect with ALLSMITH.• Lifestyle design coaching.• In person and remote training.• Apparel built for those forged through experience.• A community rooted in truth, movement, and meaning.Follow Phil Mauriello Jr. and California Underground on Instagram.https://www.instagram.com/californiaundergroundThank you for Listening! Learn more below.ALLSMITH IG ALLSMITH YouTubeBryce Smith IG

​The U.S. government's motions in limine in the case against Sean "Diddy" Combs seek to shape the evidentiary landscape for the upcoming trial. Prosecutors aim to introduce corroborative materials such as text messages, diary entries from a former employee, and a 911 call to support the testimonies of alleged victims. They argue that these pieces of evidence are crucial to demonstrate patterns of behavior and to counter anticipated challenges to the credibility of witnesses. Additionally, the government requests the exclusion of certain defense evidence, including prior consensual sexual encounters Combs had with individuals not involved in the case, asserting that such information is irrelevant and could mislead the jury.Furthermore, the prosecution seeks to admit expert testimony from psychologist Dr. Dawn Hughes, who would explain how victims of abuse might remain in relationships with their abusers due to emotional manipulation or fear. This testimony is intended to provide context for the victims' continued association with Combs, which the defense might use to question their credibility. The motions also address the admissibility of a 2016 surveillance video allegedly showing Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. The defense contests this video's inclusion, claiming it has been altered and lacks authenticityto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.260.0_1.pdf

​The U.S. government's motions in limine in the case against Sean "Diddy" Combs seek to shape the evidentiary landscape for the upcoming trial. Prosecutors aim to introduce corroborative materials such as text messages, diary entries from a former employee, and a 911 call to support the testimonies of alleged victims. They argue that these pieces of evidence are crucial to demonstrate patterns of behavior and to counter anticipated challenges to the credibility of witnesses. Additionally, the government requests the exclusion of certain defense evidence, including prior consensual sexual encounters Combs had with individuals not involved in the case, asserting that such information is irrelevant and could mislead the jury.Furthermore, the prosecution seeks to admit expert testimony from psychologist Dr. Dawn Hughes, who would explain how victims of abuse might remain in relationships with their abusers due to emotional manipulation or fear. This testimony is intended to provide context for the victims' continued association with Combs, which the defense might use to question their credibility. The motions also address the admissibility of a 2016 surveillance video allegedly showing Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. The defense contests this video's inclusion, claiming it has been altered and lacks authenticityto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.260.0_1.pdf

Emily and Shane are sitting down with Judge Elizabeth Scherer, who presided over the Parkland school shooter’s trial in 2022. Judge Liz faced controversy after this trial due to alleged biases towards the prosecution and unfair treatment of the defense. However, she’s here to set the record straight and tell us what led to this apparent “unethical” behavior. Plus, we’re discussing Nick Reiner and the sudden loss of his legal team, as well as the Diddy trial and where the prosecution went wrong…See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.