Podcast appearances and mentions of Sean Combs

Sean "Diddy" Combs' legal team has firmly denied allegations involving a second victim in his purported sex trafficking activities. They assert that these claims are baseless and part of a broader effort to tarnish Combs' reputation. His attorneys emphasize that the accusations lack credible evidence and are driven by individuals seeking financial gain or media attention.Combs, who has pleaded not guilty to all charges, remains in custody after being denied bail. His defense team is actively preparing for the upcoming trial, maintaining that the allegations are unfounded. They argue that the prosecution's case relies on unsubstantiated claims and that Combs will be exonerated once all evidence is presented in court.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Diddy's lawyers slam claims of a SECOND victim in alleged sex trafficking operation | Daily Mail Online

This filing, submitted on behalf of Sean Combs and his co-defendants in the case English v. Combs et al., opposes the plaintiff's renewed request for a 60-day extension to secure a third set of legal counsel. The defense argues that the plaintiff has already cycled through two legal teams—both of whom withdrew due to serious breakdowns in the attorney-client relationship, including what they described as “self-destructive conduct,” refusal to follow legal advice, and irreconcilable differences. The filing outlines a timeline of delays and extensions already granted, emphasizing that the plaintiff's behavior has repeatedly stalled progress and wasted the court's and defendants' time and resources.The defendants urge the court to deny any further delay, asserting that the plaintiff's complaint is fatally flawed and that she is unlikely to retain new counsel willing to continue litigating what they call “baseless claims.” They argue that granting another extension would prolong an already mismanaged case that has made little progress nearly a year after being filed. Moreover, the defense indicates it is prepared to file a motion to dismiss all eight of the plaintiff's claims with prejudice and warns that continued adjournments serve only to avoid scrutiny of the case's legal shortcomings. Ultimately, the defense calls for the case to move forward without further delay, with or without new representation for the plaintiff.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.624352.74.0.pdf

In the case of Doe v. Combs et al., No. 1:24-cv-01457-JPO, the plaintiff, Jane Doe, filed a lawsuit against Sean Combs and associated entities, alleging personal injury. The court issued a Memorandum and Order addressing several key motions. Firstly, the court granted the plaintiff's motion to proceed under a pseudonym, allowing her to maintain anonymity due to the sensitive nature of the allegations. Secondly, the court denied the defendants' motion to dismiss the case, finding that the plaintiff's claims were sufficiently plausible to proceed to discovery.Additionally, the court addressed the defendants' motion to strike certain allegations from the complaint, which was denied. The court found that the contested allegations were relevant to the plaintiff's claims and did not prejudice the defendants. The Memorandum and Order concluded by setting a schedule for discovery and encouraging both parties to consider settlement discussions. This decision allows the case to move forward, with both sides preparing for the next stages of litigation.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:24cv1457 Jones v. Combs Sanctions Order.pdf

China has been imposing export controls on several minerals for the past two years--as the leading producer of critical minerals, it holds significant leverage over other countries. A substantial part of the Trump administration's discussions with China earlier this year focused on minerals, particularly after the Chinese Communist Party halted the flow of several critical minerals following President Trump's increase in tariffs. Although the U.S. is still engaged in negotiations with China, they continue to look for solutions within the United States. Oklahoma Governor Kevin Stitt joins the Rundown to discuss his state's efforts to attract companies involved in critical mineral mining and refining to the state.  Sean 'Diddy' Combs was arrested on September 16th, 2024, and now his trial is underway as he faces several charges. These serious allegations detail what prosecutors say was a decade-long scheme to run a criminal enterprise and fuel Diddy's sexual desires. The jurors have heard graphic, explicit details about Diddy's personal life, and now they will begin deliberations this week. FOX News National Correspondent CB Cotton joins the podcast to discuss what she has observed within the courtroom and evaluates the defenses' argument.   Plus, commentary from presidential historian and author of “The Power and the Money,” Tevi Troy.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Odds of Diddy Going Down? Which Of the Three Charges Could Stick? We Break It Down! Sean “Diddy” Combs is staring down some of the most serious federal charges imaginable—racketeering conspiracy, sex trafficking, and interstate prostitution—and now the jury is preparing to decide his fate. But how strong is the government's case really? In this episode, we break down exactly what Diddy's facing, what each charge requires under federal law, and—most importantly—which ones the jury is most likely to convict on. We walk you through the complex RICO charge, which alleges that Combs ran a criminal enterprise through manipulation, bribery, and violence. It's a hard charge to prove, and the defense hammered that in their closing. But sex trafficking? That might be a different story. With disturbing video evidence, graphic testimony, and a pattern of control over alleged victims like Cassie Ventura and others, this could be where prosecutors land their biggest hit. And then there's the sleeper: transportation for prostitution. It's narrowly defined, well-documented, and doesn't require the emotional nuance of the other charges. If Diddy goes down, this could be the count that does it. In this true crime breakdown, we don't speculate—we map out the legal thresholds, the courtroom facts, and the likely jury reasoning based on what's been presented over the last few weeks. Whether Diddy walks, runs, or falls hard, this episode explains what really matters now that the trial has hit its final moments. Stay tuned, subscribe for verdict updates, and drop your thoughts in the comments: Will Diddy be found guilty? And if so, on what? Hashtags: #SeanCombs #DiddyTrial #RICOCase #SexTrafficking #TrueCrimeAnalysis #CelebrityJustice #FederalCharges #LegalBreakdown #JuryDeliberation #HighProfileTrial Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872 

Sean Combs' Trial Secrets: Why Some Charges Suddenly Vanished In a shocking courtroom twist during Sean "Diddy" Combs' federal trial, prosecutors abruptly dropped critical charges of kidnapping and arson. Why did these serious allegations suddenly vanish from the prosecution's strategy? Was it a carefully planned move to streamline their case or a desperate response to losing key witnesses and evidence? In this detailed video, legal expert Eric Faddis—a defense attorney and former prosecutor experienced in high-profile cases—pulls back the curtain on these surprising trial developments. Eric carefully analyzes the possible motives behind prosecutors narrowing their case mid-trial, discussing how jurors might perceive such sudden shifts. Could dropping these charges cast doubt on the overall credibility of the prosecution's narrative, or does it sharpen their remaining allegations, making it easier for jurors to follow? Furthermore, Eric dives into the broader implications of this strategy, dissecting the complexities of proving charges under federal RICO statutes. With the prosecution now focusing tightly on sex trafficking by coercion and interstate prostitution, Faddis evaluates whether this streamlined approach could actually strengthen their chances or leave jurors questioning the case's validity. Additionally, Eric addresses critical behind-the-scenes considerations, like witness credibility issues, missing testimonies, and the psychological impact of sudden strategic pivots on jury deliberations. Could prosecutors have miscalculated their strategy, ultimately damaging their own case, or was this an unavoidable move due to insufficient evidence? As viewers follow every twist in this intense trial, Eric Faddis offers indispensable insider analysis, clearly explaining why certain charges disappeared and how this could dramatically influence the jury's upcoming decision. Watch now to uncover the hidden dynamics at play in one of the most high-profile celebrity trials in recent years. Hashtags: #SeanCombsSecrets #FederalTrial #DiddyChargesDropped #CourtroomStrategy #EricFaddis #TrueCrimeSecrets #LegalBreakdown #CelebrityJustice #TrialTwists #RICOTrial  Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872 

On the third day of Sean "Diddy" Combs' federal sex trafficking and racketeering trial, Cassie Ventura delivered harrowing testimony detailing years of alleged abuse during their 11-year relationship. She recounted being coerced into drug-fueled sexual encounters, termed "freak-offs," often involving male escorts and filmed by Combs for blackmail purposes. Ventura described suffering physical injuries, including a 2013 incident where Combs threw a vase at her, resulting in a cut to her eyebrow. She also testified about a 2016 assault captured on hotel surveillance footage, where Combs was seen attacking her in a hallway. Despite settling a civil lawsuit in 2023 for $20 million, Ventura chose to testify in the criminal trial to confront the truth and end her silence.Ventura further alleged that Combs raped her in 2018 after their breakup, during a visit to her home following a lunch meeting intended for closure. She described the assault as swift and traumatic, stating she cried and said "no," but Combs proceeded regardless. Additionally, Ventura testified about the psychological toll of the abuse, revealing she suffered from PTSD and had contemplated suicide before seeking therapy in 2023. Her testimony also included claims that Combs threatened others, including rapper Kid Cudi, and used explicit videos to manipulate and control her. Combs has pleaded not guilty to all charges and remains in custody; if convicted, he faces up to life in prison.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:May 14, 2025 - Day 3 of testimony in the Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial | CNNshow less

On the fourth day of Sean "Diddy" Combs' federal sex trafficking and racketeering trial, Cassie Ventura faced intense cross-examination from the defense. Attorney Anna Estevao sought to portray Ventura as a consenting participant in their tumultuous relationship, highlighting text messages and emails that suggested mutual affection and willingness to engage in the so-called "freak-offs"—drug-fueled group sex encounters central to the prosecution's case. The defense emphasized instances where Ventura appeared to plan these events, referencing messages where she expressed anticipation and involvement in organizing them. They also delved into her past relationships, including with rapper Kid Cudi and actor Michael B. Jordan, to suggest mutual jealousy and complexity in her relationship with Combs.Ventura, who is currently eight months pregnant, maintained that her participation in these events was driven by fear and manipulation. She testified that Combs exerted control over her, using threats and violence to coerce her into compliance. When questioned about their drug use, Ventura acknowledged that they both used substances but asserted that Combs became angry if she used drugs without him, indicating a controlling dynamic. She also recounted incidents of violence, including an episode where Combs allegedly threw a wooden hanger at her friend, leading to the end of that friendship. Despite the defense's efforts to challenge her credibility, Ventura remained composed, reiterating that her actions were often a result of coercion and fear.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:May 15, 2025 - Day 4 of testimony in the Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial | CNN

The Sean “Diddy” Combs federal trial has concluded with both sides resting, leaving the jury to decide whether the music mogul was a charismatic entertainer or the orchestrator of a criminal empire. Over six weeks, the prosecution laid out a chilling case of racketeering, sex trafficking, and prostitution violations, painting Combs as a man who used his fame and power to abuse women, orchestrate drug-fueled “freak-offs,” and silence dissent through intimidation and bribes. Witnesses described a coordinated effort to traffic victims like Cassie Ventura and “Jane,” transport male escorts across state lines, and suppress damaging evidence. The government argued that even one coerced sex act, arranged and concealed as part of a long-standing pattern, was enough to convict. Their narrative was cohesive, graphic, and deeply corroborated.The defense, meanwhile, called no witnesses and leaned entirely on cross-examination and closing arguments to argue that Combs was guilty only of bad behavior—not federal crimes. They insisted the sexual encounters were consensual, that witnesses had financial motives, and that the government was criminalizing a lifestyle. Now, the jury must interpret a trial that balanced disturbing detail with questions of consent, coercion, and credibility. While the Mann Act charges are seen as more straightforward, the RICO and trafficking counts carry heavier weight—and if the jury finds the government met its burden, Combs could face a life-altering conviction. Either way, the trial marks a major reckoning not just for Diddy, but for the unchecked power of celebrity. the federal trial of Sean “Diddy” Combs—a case that has spanned weeks, rocked the music industry, and laid bare allegations that stretch far beyond the headlines. With all the evidence now heard, no more witnesses left to take the stand, and both sides having delivered their closing arguments, this is the moment to step back and assess the damage—and the danger—for Combs. In this episode, we'll go charge by charge, breaking down what the prosecution was able to prove, how the defense responded, and where I believe the jury is most likely to land when that verdict is finally read. From racketeering to sex trafficking, from manipulation to power and fear—this is where it all comes together.In this episode, we're left with our final impressions from the courtroom—after weeks of raw testimony, graphic allegations, and a legal chess match that's now officially over. The evidence is in. The witnesses have spoken. The attorneys have made their last appeals. And now, all that's left is the verdict. So in this episode, we're taking a close, unflinching look at where things truly stand for Sean “Diddy” Combs—not in the court of public opinion, but in the eyes of twelve jurors. We'll walk through each count he's facing, break down the strength of the evidence, and I'll give you my take on whether I think he'll be convicted or walk free. Let's dive in!to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

The Sean “Diddy” Combs federal trial has concluded with both sides resting, leaving the jury to decide whether the music mogul was a charismatic entertainer or the orchestrator of a criminal empire. Over six weeks, the prosecution laid out a chilling case of racketeering, sex trafficking, and prostitution violations, painting Combs as a man who used his fame and power to abuse women, orchestrate drug-fueled “freak-offs,” and silence dissent through intimidation and bribes. Witnesses described a coordinated effort to traffic victims like Cassie Ventura and “Jane,” transport male escorts across state lines, and suppress damaging evidence. The government argued that even one coerced sex act, arranged and concealed as part of a long-standing pattern, was enough to convict. Their narrative was cohesive, graphic, and deeply corroborated.The defense, meanwhile, called no witnesses and leaned entirely on cross-examination and closing arguments to argue that Combs was guilty only of bad behavior—not federal crimes. They insisted the sexual encounters were consensual, that witnesses had financial motives, and that the government was criminalizing a lifestyle. Now, the jury must interpret a trial that balanced disturbing detail with questions of consent, coercion, and credibility. While the Mann Act charges are seen as more straightforward, the RICO and trafficking counts carry heavier weight—and if the jury finds the government met its burden, Combs could face a life-altering conviction. Either way, the trial marks a major reckoning not just for Diddy, but for the unchecked power of celebrity. the federal trial of Sean “Diddy” Combs—a case that has spanned weeks, rocked the music industry, and laid bare allegations that stretch far beyond the headlines. With all the evidence now heard, no more witnesses left to take the stand, and both sides having delivered their closing arguments, this is the moment to step back and assess the damage—and the danger—for Combs. In this episode, we'll go charge by charge, breaking down what the prosecution was able to prove, how the defense responded, and where I believe the jury is most likely to land when that verdict is finally read. From racketeering to sex trafficking, from manipulation to power and fear—this is where it all comes together.In this episode, we're left with our final impressions from the courtroom—after weeks of raw testimony, graphic allegations, and a legal chess match that's now officially over. The evidence is in. The witnesses have spoken. The attorneys have made their last appeals. And now, all that's left is the verdict. So in this episode, we're taking a close, unflinching look at where things truly stand for Sean “Diddy” Combs—not in the court of public opinion, but in the eyes of twelve jurors. We'll walk through each count he's facing, break down the strength of the evidence, and I'll give you my take on whether I think he'll be convicted or walk free. Let's dive in!to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

The Sean “Diddy” Combs federal trial has concluded with both sides resting, leaving the jury to decide whether the music mogul was a charismatic entertainer or the orchestrator of a criminal empire. Over six weeks, the prosecution laid out a chilling case of racketeering, sex trafficking, and prostitution violations, painting Combs as a man who used his fame and power to abuse women, orchestrate drug-fueled “freak-offs,” and silence dissent through intimidation and bribes. Witnesses described a coordinated effort to traffic victims like Cassie Ventura and “Jane,” transport male escorts across state lines, and suppress damaging evidence. The government argued that even one coerced sex act, arranged and concealed as part of a long-standing pattern, was enough to convict. Their narrative was cohesive, graphic, and deeply corroborated.The defense, meanwhile, called no witnesses and leaned entirely on cross-examination and closing arguments to argue that Combs was guilty only of bad behavior—not federal crimes. They insisted the sexual encounters were consensual, that witnesses had financial motives, and that the government was criminalizing a lifestyle. Now, the jury must interpret a trial that balanced disturbing detail with questions of consent, coercion, and credibility. While the Mann Act charges are seen as more straightforward, the RICO and trafficking counts carry heavier weight—and if the jury finds the government met its burden, Combs could face a life-altering conviction. Either way, the trial marks a major reckoning not just for Diddy, but for the unchecked power of celebrity. the federal trial of Sean “Diddy” Combs—a case that has spanned weeks, rocked the music industry, and laid bare allegations that stretch far beyond the headlines. With all the evidence now heard, no more witnesses left to take the stand, and both sides having delivered their closing arguments, this is the moment to step back and assess the damage—and the danger—for Combs. In this episode, we'll go charge by charge, breaking down what the prosecution was able to prove, how the defense responded, and where I believe the jury is most likely to land when that verdict is finally read. From racketeering to sex trafficking, from manipulation to power and fear—this is where it all comes together.In this episode, we're left with our final impressions from the courtroom—after weeks of raw testimony, graphic allegations, and a legal chess match that's now officially over. The evidence is in. The witnesses have spoken. The attorneys have made their last appeals. And now, all that's left is the verdict. So in this episode, we're taking a close, unflinching look at where things truly stand for Sean “Diddy” Combs—not in the court of public opinion, but in the eyes of twelve jurors. We'll walk through each count he's facing, break down the strength of the evidence, and I'll give you my take on whether I think he'll be convicted or walk free. Let's dive in!to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

​Sean "Diddy" Combs' legal team has filed a motion to exclude a 2016 surveillance video from his upcoming federal trial, arguing that the footage—released by CNN in 2024—has been altered and is not a reliable representation of events. The video depicts Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura, at the InterContinental Hotel in Los Angeles. Combs, who has previously apologized for his actions in the video, is currently facing charges including racketeering, sex trafficking, and coercion. His lawyers claim that the video was manipulated, with distortions and speed alterations that exaggerate his actions, and that the original tape was destroyed, making it inadmissible as evidence. ​The defense has requested a hearing to allow expert testimony on the video's alleged inaccuracies. They argue that the government's inability to authenticate the footage, due to the destruction of the original and the presence of technical inconsistencies, renders it inadmissible. Prosecutors have previously used the video to argue for Combs' detention, citing the threat he poses to women. Combs remains in custody at MDC-Brooklyn, with his trial scheduled to begin on May 5, 2025.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Diddy requests 'distorted' Cassie videos not be shown at trial

Odds of Diddy Going Down? Which Of the Three Charges Could Stick? We Break It Down! Sean “Diddy” Combs is staring down some of the most serious federal charges imaginable—racketeering conspiracy, sex trafficking, and interstate prostitution—and now the jury is preparing to decide his fate. But how strong is the government's case really? In this episode, we break down exactly what Diddy's facing, what each charge requires under federal law, and—most importantly—which ones the jury is most likely to convict on. We walk you through the complex RICO charge, which alleges that Combs ran a criminal enterprise through manipulation, bribery, and violence. It's a hard charge to prove, and the defense hammered that in their closing. But sex trafficking? That might be a different story. With disturbing video evidence, graphic testimony, and a pattern of control over alleged victims like Cassie Ventura and others, this could be where prosecutors land their biggest hit. And then there's the sleeper: transportation for prostitution. It's narrowly defined, well-documented, and doesn't require the emotional nuance of the other charges. If Diddy goes down, this could be the count that does it. In this true crime breakdown, we don't speculate—we map out the legal thresholds, the courtroom facts, and the likely jury reasoning based on what's been presented over the last few weeks. Whether Diddy walks, runs, or falls hard, this episode explains what really matters now that the trial has hit its final moments. Stay tuned, subscribe for verdict updates, and drop your thoughts in the comments: Will Diddy be found guilty? And if so, on what? Hashtags: #SeanCombs #DiddyTrial #RICOCase #SexTrafficking #TrueCrimeAnalysis #CelebrityJustice #FederalCharges #LegalBreakdown #JuryDeliberation #HighProfileTrial Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872 

Firefighters shot and ambushed while responding to an Idaho brushfire, the celebrity guests are leaving Venice following Jeff Bezos' $50M wedding, Trump is set to open "Alligator Alcatraz" tomorrow, Diddy's son releases new song called "Diddy Free", and a creepy family set up fake dental clinic for years...

VLOG June 30 US v Sean Combs Day 33, jury charge and deliberations, Week 7 book: https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=fBppEQAAQBAJ…Inner City Press covers https://matthewrussellleeicp.substack.com/p/extra-in-combs-trial-agnifilo-says…Docs https://patreon.com/posts/diddy-docket-as-132654556…"Big Beautiful Bill," Tillis. Do Kwon 7/15. UN @AntonioGuterres censor in Spain

VLOG June 30 US v Sean Combs Day 33, jury charge and deliberations, Week 7 book: https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=fBppEQAAQBAJInner City Press covers https://matthewrussellleeicp.substack.com/p/extra-in-combs-trial-agnifilo-saysDocs https://www.patreon.com/posts/diddy-docket-as-132654556"Big Beautiful Bill," Tillis. Do Kwon 7/15. UN @AntonioGuterres censor in Spain

Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.       This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.       Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.  Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime, or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week in Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872  

Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.       This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.       Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.  Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime, or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week in Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872  

Alice Red Pill returns to Paranoi Radio with raw updates on the explosive Diddy trial. From possible trial dismissal to the silenced voices of victims, she exposes what mainstream media won't touch — including the famous names being protected behind the scenes. A powerful deep dive into the dark underbelly of celebrity justice.// FOLLOW Alice Red Pill// FOLLOW ALICE RED PILL ORIGINAL ALERT OPERATIONS: CRYPTID WARFARE GET CLEAN: DETOX AND MAKE KIDS HEALTHY AGAIN// // GET 15% OFF AT CHECK OUT USING "PARANOI" at FLAVORS OF THE FOREST⬆️⬆️⬆️// STRUGGLING WITH MENTAL HEALTH? GET $50 OFF  YOUR NEXT LIFE CHANGING TREATMENT AT MENTAL WARIOR by Dr Atwell& VISIT ParanoiRadio.com ☂️

Israel Florez, a former security supervisor at the InterContinental Hotel in Los Angeles, testified on the first day of Sean "Diddy" Combs' federal trial and described a 2016 incident involving Combs and Cassie Ventura. Florez told the jury he witnessed security footage showing Combs physically assaulting Ventura in a hotel hallway. According to his account, the footage captured Combs throwing a glass object at Ventura, dragging her by her hair, kicking her while she was on the ground, and later slamming her into a wall near the elevator. Florez said the footage disturbed him enough that he reported it to hotel management and saved a copy, fearing the original would be deleted.Florez further testified that Combs later confronted him about the tape and attempted to silence him by offering a bribe. He said Combs handed him an envelope filled with cash and instructed him to get rid of the footage. Florez refused and claimed he interpreted the encounter as an effort to cover up the incident. The government presented this testimony as part of a broader narrative that Combs used violence and then relied on money and influence to conceal it. The surveillance footage itself — previously leaked to the public — was played in full for the jury, reinforcing the prosecution's claim that this was not an isolated outburst but part of a larger pattern of coercive behavior.Daniel Phillip, a former male escort, took the stand as the second witness on Day One of Sean "Diddy" Combs' federal sex trafficking trial. Phillip testified that he was hired multiple times to engage in sexual acts with Cassie Ventura while Combs allegedly watched. According to his account, the encounters were arranged through intermediaries working for Combs, and he was paid thousands of dollars in cash after each meeting. Phillip said the settings were often private hotels or residences, and that the sessions were not casual — they were specific, orchestrated, and in some cases involved explicit instructions from Combs regarding what was to take place.Phillip also testified that over time, the nature of the encounters became more controlled. He recalled moments when Ventura appeared detached or uncomfortable and described the environment as one where Combs held clear dominance. He told the jury that he was warned not to speak about the arrangements, and that the overall experience felt more like an assignment than a consensual interaction. Prosecutors used his testimony to support the core of their trafficking charges — arguing that Combs not only arranged for sex acts to occur, but financially facilitated them in a manner that meets the threshold of federal sex trafficking statutes. The defense, meanwhile, worked to undermine Phillip's credibility, implying he had personal motives and highlighting the consensual framing of adult relationships. Still, Phillip's account added a layer of specificity to the government's claim that Combs used his wealth and status to structure and control exploitative sexual scenarios.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Male escort was paid 'thousands of dollars' to have sex with Cassie while Diddy watched, he testifies on day 1 of trial

In a letter submitted via ECF to Judge Arun Subramanian, attorney Robert Balin, representing a coalition of major media outlets—including The Associated Press, ABC News, NBC News, The New York Times, The Washington Post, CBS News, NPR, Reuters, and others—raised concerns over the government's failure to provide timely public access to exhibits introduced during the testimony of the pseudonymous witness known as “Jane” in United States v. Combs. The government had previously assured both the Court and the News Organizations that such access would be granted in a manner consistent with open court proceedings and First Amendment protections.However, the letter asserts that those assurances were not honored, and the media was effectively prevented from reviewing exhibits contemporaneously with the witness's testimony. The News Organizations argue that this delay undermines both the principles of transparency and the public's constitutional right to observe judicial proceedings in real time. They request that the Court ensure immediate access to all future exhibits admitted into evidence, including those associated with sensitive or pseudonymous witnesses, barring any compelling and legally justified reason for delay.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Combs Trial - Letter re Delays re Jane Doe Exhibits 4913-4050-8751 v.2

In the amended complaint filed under case number 1:24-cv-07977-VSB, plaintiff Shareka Sherrod accuses Sean Combs and a network of his affiliated companies—including Daddy's House Recordings, Combs Global, and multiple Bad Boy Entertainment entities—of engaging in a pattern of egregious misconduct that she alleges amounts to sex trafficking, assault, battery, and other civil rights violations. Sherrod claims she was manipulated, exploited, and abused while under the influence and control of Combs and his enterprise, which she describes as operating with a coordinated structure designed to lure, intimidate, and silence victims. The complaint also names numerous “Organizational Does” and “Individual Does,” suggesting additional perpetrators and enablers whose identities may be revealed through discovery.Sherrod's lawsuit demands a jury trial and asserts that the abuse she suffered was not incidental, but part of a broader, systematized operation of exploitation embedded within Combs' business empire. The complaint details alleged psychological and physical harm, and frames her experience as one of many involving women recruited and harmed under similar circumstances. Through this civil action, Sherrod seeks not only monetary damages but legal accountability for what she claims was a deliberate and sustained campaign of abuse and cover-up enabled by corporate infrastructure and protected by power.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.630246.64.0.pdf

The Prosecution:   During the opening statements of Sean "Diddy" Combs's federal sex trafficking trial, prosecutors portrayed him as a powerful figure who led a criminal enterprise over two decades. Assistant U.S. Attorney Emily Johnson described Combs as having a "larger than life" public persona with a darker side that involved coercing women into drug-fueled sexual encounters and using violence to maintain control. The prosecution alleged that Combs's inner circle, including bodyguards and high-ranking employees, assisted in committing and concealing crimes such as kidnapping, arson, bribery, and obstruction of justice. Key evidence includes testimonies from three women—ex-girlfriend Cassie Ventura, a woman referred to as "Jane," and a former assistant named "Mia"—as well as surveillance footage from a 2016 incident showing Combs assaulting Ventura in a Los Angeles hotel hallway.Prosecutors detailed disturbing allegations, including Combs orchestrating events known as "freak-offs," where women were allegedly forced into degrading acts with male sex workers. One specific claim involved Combs instructing a sex worker to urinate in Ventura's mouth during such an event. The prosecution contends that these acts were part of a broader pattern of abuse and exploitation facilitated by Combs's entertainment empire. Combs has pleaded not guilty to all charges, which include racketeering conspiracy, sex trafficking, and transportation to engage in prostitution, and faces the possibility of life imprisonment if convicted.The  Defense:During the opening statements of Sean "Diddy" Combs's federal sex trafficking trial, his defense team, led by attorney Teny Geragos, acknowledged Combs's history of violence and temper but firmly denied that his actions constituted sex trafficking, racketeering, or prostitution. Geragos portrayed the case as one centered on "love, jealousy, infidelity, and money," arguing that the relationships in question were consensual adult interactions, including participation in a "swinger's lifestyle." She emphasized that while Combs may have exhibited abusive behavior, the prosecution's attempt to classify these personal relationships as criminal enterprises was a mischaracterization.The defense also sought to humanize Combs, reminding jurors that he is not on trial for being "mean" or a "jerk," but for specific criminal charges that they argue are unfounded. Geragos highlighted that the government's case intrudes into Combs's private life without sufficient legal basis, asserting that the alleged victims were capable individuals who made their own choices. She contended that the prosecution's narrative was an overreach, attempting to criminalize consensual activities and personal flawsto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:(4) Live updates: Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial opening statements | CNN

In the amended complaint filed under case number 1:24-cv-07977-VSB, plaintiff Shareka Sherrod accuses Sean Combs and a network of his affiliated companies—including Daddy's House Recordings, Combs Global, and multiple Bad Boy Entertainment entities—of engaging in a pattern of egregious misconduct that she alleges amounts to sex trafficking, assault, battery, and other civil rights violations. Sherrod claims she was manipulated, exploited, and abused while under the influence and control of Combs and his enterprise, which she describes as operating with a coordinated structure designed to lure, intimidate, and silence victims. The complaint also names numerous “Organizational Does” and “Individual Does,” suggesting additional perpetrators and enablers whose identities may be revealed through discovery.Sherrod's lawsuit demands a jury trial and asserts that the abuse she suffered was not incidental, but part of a broader, systematized operation of exploitation embedded within Combs' business empire. The complaint details alleged psychological and physical harm, and frames her experience as one of many involving women recruited and harmed under similar circumstances. Through this civil action, Sherrod seeks not only monetary damages but legal accountability for what she claims was a deliberate and sustained campaign of abuse and cover-up enabled by corporate infrastructure and protected by power.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.630246.64.0.pdf

DescriptionDuring her testimony in Sean "Diddy" Combs's federal sex trafficking trial, Cassie Ventura detailed a decade-long relationship marked by control, abuse, and coercion. She described how Combs exerted dominance over her personal and professional life, dictating aspects such as her clothing choices and daily interactions. Ventura recounted being subjected to physical violence for minor infractions, including being beaten for making "the wrong face." She also testified about being forced to carry a firearm for Combs, which she believed was intended to intimidate her .Ventura's testimony included accounts of being compelled to participate in "freak-offs," which she described as drug-fueled, multi-day sex parties involving male escorts, orchestrated and filmed by Combs. She alleged that during these events, she was forced into degrading acts, such as being urinated on, and was left to clean up afterward. Ventura expressed feelings of humiliation and worthlessness, stating that she engaged in these acts out of fear and a sense of obligation. She also recounted a 2016 incident, captured on surveillance video, where Combs assaulted her in a hotel hallway. Throughout her testimony, Ventura emphasized the pervasive control and abuse she endured, which she said led her to abandon her music career .to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:May 13, 2025 - Day 2 of testimony in the Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial | CNN

In the case United States v. Combs, Inc., 24-cr-542 (AS), the defense submitted a letter to Judge Subramanian further supporting their requested edits to the Court's proposed jury charge. The defense elaborated on certain issues that were referenced in comment bubbles within their proposed edits, which are aimed at modifying the jury instructions to better align with their legal arguments. These proposed edits highlight key areas where the defense believes the current jury charge may mislead or improperly influence the jury's decision-making process.Additionally, the defense also addressed objections to the government's redline edits, which likely included the prosecution's own proposed modifications to the jury instructions. The letter emphasized specific points of contention where the defense felt the prosecution's edits were either incomplete or insufficient in ensuring that the jury received a fair and accurate legal framework for deliberation. The correspondence from the defense represents a critical step in refining the instructions that the jury will follow when ultimately deciding the outcome of the case.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.421.0.pdf

Sean “Diddy” Combs, also known as Puff Daddy, is at the center of one of the biggest racketeering trials in hip hop history. Accused of running a criminal organization tied to RICO charges, sex trafficking, drug trafficking, bribery, forced labor, kidnapping, and witness tampering, Diddy faces a high-stakes jury deliberation that could bring down his entire empire.Anita Marks and Nevin Shapiro team up with top South Florida criminal defense attorney Mark Eiglarsh to break down every explosive detail of the trial. They explore how federal prosecutors portrayed Diddy as the ruthless leader of a racketeering enterprise, why his legal team chose to call zero defense witnesses, and what the jury must decide next. Could this be the ultimate downfall of Puff Daddy, or will the defense's gamble pay off?If you're following every twist in this case — from the Cassie Ventura settlement to witness intimidation claims — this episode gives you a front-row seat to the legal drama gripping the nation. Stay tuned for our upcoming reaction to the verdict and what it means for the future of hip hop.Timestamps: 00:00 Closing Arguments Wrap 00:20 Jury Set to Deliberate 02:22 Jury Instructions and Legal Standards 03:42 The “Criminal Kingdom” Theory 04:11 RICO and Racketeering Explained 06:24 Prosecution's Performance 09:10 No Defense Witnesses Surprise 10:25 Why Zero Witnesses? 17:56 $100K Hotel Payment — Bribe or Not?Follow the Hosts: Anita Marks: https://www.instagram.com/anita_marks Nevin Shapiro: https://www.instagram.com/nevinshapiro/Produced by: Michael Lazo: https://www.instagram.com/digilazo/

Prosecutors in Sean "Diddy" Combs' federal sex trafficking trial have encountered a significant challenge: they are unable to locate a key witness, identified as "Victim-3." This witness was expected to provide crucial testimony regarding allegations that Combs coerced her into sexual acts. During court proceedings on May 7, 2025, Assistant U.S. Attorney Maurene Comey informed the judge that both the witness and her attorney have been unresponsive, and there's uncertainty about her appearance even if subpoenaed. This development raises concerns about the prosecution's ability to present a comprehensive case.Despite this setback, the prosecution plans to proceed with testimonies from other accusers, including Combs' ex-girlfriend Cassie Ventura. The absence of Victim-3's testimony could impact the prosecution's strategy, but they remain committed to presenting the available evidence. Combs faces serious charges, including sex trafficking and racketeering, and has pleaded not guilty. The trial continues as both sides prepare for opening statements scheduled for May 12.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Sean 'Diddy' Combs' prosecutors admit they may go to trial without key witnessBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The New York Post has reported viewing videos from Sean "Diddy" Combs' parties that allegedly depict explicit activities involving guests and hired performers. These recordings are said to show sexual acts and suggestive behavior, raising concerns about potential exploitation and misconduct at these events.The content of these videos has led to further scrutiny of Combs' personal conduct and the nature of his gatherings. While the Post has not released the videos publicly, their descriptions have contributed to the ongoing discussions and legal considerations surrounding Combs' actions and the broader implications for the entertainment industry.In this episode, we dive in!(commercial at 9:52)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Exclusive | Diddy mixed A-list parties with 'Freak Off' sex shows: tapesBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Defense attorney Marc Agnifilo argued that Cassie Ventura was the winner of her relationship with Combs. "She is sitting somewhere in the world with $30 million," he said. "He's in jail." And he tried to make the prosecution of Combs relatable. "They take yellow crime scene tape, figuratively, and they wrap it around his bedroom," he said. "The crime scene is your private sex life." In its rebuttal, the prosecution said the defense "just spent a whole lot of energy trying to blame his victims and the U.S. government for his lies, his threats, and his violence."If you want to read NBC's coverage of the trial, check out our newsletter, “Diddy On Trial”: NBCNews.com/Diddy 

The greatest pod in the world opens up its latest episode with homie court (3:05) before Joe shares about going to his brother's graduation and parenting kids who may or may not want to go to college (21:00). The JBP then reacts to Jeff Bezos having a $50 million wedding in Venice (39:30), the 2025 NBA Draft (1:04:37), and T-Pain comments about Drake not taking his own advice to exit gracefully from the music industry (1:16:45). In new music, a record from Rick Ross & Pharrell (1:39:48) and Wale releases a new freestyle (1:45:48). Also, July 4th is around the corner (2:06:40), closing arguments in the Diddy case (2:18:44), The New York Times releases its 100 best movies of the 21st Century (2:37:55), and much more!  Become a Patron of The Joe Budden Podcast for additional bonus episodes and visual content for all things JBP! Join our Patreon here: http://www.patreon.com/joebudden  Sleeper Picks:  Joe | TheARTI$t (feat. Kaliii) - “Red Light Special” Ice | Pusha T (feat. Labrinth & Malice) - “I Pray For You” Parks | Nick Grant - “It Ain't Personal” Ish | Elijah Waters - “Lose Control”  Melyssa | Maray - “Gemini”

Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.       This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.       Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.  Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime, or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week in Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872  

Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.       This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.       Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.  Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime, or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week in Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872  

Full show - FrYiday | Uber | News or Nope - The end-of-week Nope-off | Feel Good Friday | Party foul | Slacker wants to bring back "The Diary" | Erica's ColoraDO List - The Rockies game and what's planned for this weekend | Occasional Diddy Dirt | Mind the gap, Slacker! | Stupid stories www.instagram.com/theslackershow www.instagram.com/ericasheaaa www.instagram.com/thackiswack www.instagram.com/radioerin

First look at Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sanchez's wedding in Venice. Plus, nearly 30 years after her death, the market for Princess Diana's personal belongings remains red hot. And  the defense attorneys for Sean Combs argue for their client's innocence on all charges. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

In the case of United States v. Sean Combs (24 Cr. 542), federal prosecutors have filed an opposition to the defense's motions requesting a hearing, a bill of particulars, and a gag order. The defense sought a hearing to investigate alleged government leaks of evidence, specifically a 2016 video purportedly showing Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. Prosecutors refuted these claims, stating they did not possess the video prior to its public release and had no involvement in its dissemination. They argued that the defense's allegations are baseless and represent a strategic attempt to suppress critical evidence that is highly probative of Combs' alleged criminal conduct.Regarding the request for a bill of particulars, the defense sought detailed information about the charges to prepare for trial. Prosecutors contended that the indictment already provides sufficient detail, outlining the nature of the charges and the alleged criminal activities. They maintained that additional specifics are unnecessary and could compromise ongoing investigations or witness safety. Concerning the motion for a gag order to prevent public statements by potential witnesses and attorneys, prosecutors argued that existing court orders already address these concerns, rendering the defense's request redundant. They emphasized the importance of balancing the defendant's right to a fair trial with the public's right to information, asserting that current measures are adequate to maintain this balance.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:diddy.pdf

In the case of United States v. Sean Combs (24 Cr. 542), federal prosecutors have filed an opposition to the defense's motions requesting a hearing, a bill of particulars, and a gag order. The defense sought a hearing to investigate alleged government leaks of evidence, specifically a 2016 video purportedly showing Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. Prosecutors refuted these claims, stating they did not possess the video prior to its public release and had no involvement in its dissemination. They argued that the defense's allegations are baseless and represent a strategic attempt to suppress critical evidence that is highly probative of Combs' alleged criminal conduct.Regarding the request for a bill of particulars, the defense sought detailed information about the charges to prepare for trial. Prosecutors contended that the indictment already provides sufficient detail, outlining the nature of the charges and the alleged criminal activities. They maintained that additional specifics are unnecessary and could compromise ongoing investigations or witness safety. Concerning the motion for a gag order to prevent public statements by potential witnesses and attorneys, prosecutors argued that existing court orders already address these concerns, rendering the defense's request redundant. They emphasized the importance of balancing the defendant's right to a fair trial with the public's right to information, asserting that current measures are adequate to maintain this balance.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:diddy.pdf

Last fall, the Justice Department unveiled a series of shocking allegations against Sean Combs, the music mogul known as Diddy.Prosecutors charged Mr. Combs with sex trafficking and racketeering, and for the past seven weeks, they have argued their case in a Manhattan courtroom.Ben Sisario, who has been covering the trial, explains the ins and outs of the proceedings and discusses the media circus surrounding it.Guest: Ben Sisario, a reporter for The New York Times covering music and the music industry.Background reading: Read four takeaways from the closing argument at Mr. Combs's trial.Here's a timeline of Mr. Combs's career, including his rise in hip-hop, controversies and legal disputes.For more information on today's episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday. Photo: Paras Griffin/Getty Images Unlock full access to New York Times podcasts and explore everything from politics to pop culture. Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify.

"He won't take no for an answer," said prosecutor Christy Slavik. She said it over and over during a summation that lasted more than four hours. She argued that the "common purpose" of Combs and his "inner circle" -- his chief of staff, his bodyguards, and some of his assistants -- was to protect him from bad press and law enforcement. And she recounted the dramatic stories told in the courtroom in the past six weeks: Goodfellas-type scenes of alleged bribery, arson, and kidnapping.If you want to read NBC's coverage of the trial, check out our newsletter, “Diddy On Trial”: NBCNews.com/Diddy

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth blasts the media for downplaying the success of US strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, accusing reporters of anti-Trump bias and relying on misleading leaks. The Trump administration plans to restrict Congress's access to classified intel. Prosecutors in the Sean "Diddy" Combs trial tell jurors the rapper led a criminal enterprise, pointing to drug distribution, arson, and sex trafficking as predicate crimes. Republican consultant Ryan Girdusky gives an exclusive deep dive on 33-year-old Muslim democratic socialist Zohran Mamdani, Democrat nominee for NYC mayor. Cozy Earth: Luxury shouldn't be out of reach. Go to https://cozyearth.com/MEGYNfor up to 40% off Cozy Earth's best-selling temperature-regulating sheets, apparel, and more. FYSI: https://FYSI.com/Megyn or call 800-877-4000

Megyn Kelly celebrates three major victories for the rule of law at the Supreme Court, including on nationwide injunctions, birthright citizenship, and parental rights.Then she's joined by Dave Aronberg and Will Chamberlain, legal experts, to discuss the wins for conservatives in three massive 6-3 rulings at the Supreme Court today, the legal argument between Justice Amy Coney Barrett and Justice Ketanji Brown, and more. Then Maureen Callahan, host of "The Nerve with Maureen Callahan," joins to discuss the closing argument from prosecutors laying out the depth of Diddy's utter depravity, the overwhelming evidence against Diddy, their new "Megyn O" parody of "Misery" Obama's terrible podcast, Michelle Obama's latest complaints trashing her husband Barack and children, the secrets of morning television, the falsity of their supposed happiness, what major TV hosts are like behind-the-scenes, the ridiculous wedding of Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sanchez, the exclusive guest list packed with A-list celebrities and also the Kardashians, the truth about their bizarre relationship, Anna Wintour's decades-long politicization of Vogue, her CNN interview praising Michelle Obama's "heroism" and ignoring Melania Trump, her exit from the spotlight now, and more. Subscribe to Maureen's new show The Nerve: https://TheNerveShow.com/Apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-nerve-with-maureen-callahan/id1808684702Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/4kR07GQGQAJaMNtLc9Cg2oYouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@thenerveshow Aronberg- https://www.amazon.com/Fighting-Florida-Shuffle-Corruption-Treatment/dp/1964686482Chamberlain- https://www.article3project.org/ DailyLook: https://dailylook.com to take your style quiz and use code MEGYN for 50% off your first order.Firecracker Farm: Visit https://firecracker.FARM & enter code MK at checkout for a special discount!Grand Canyon University: https://GCU.eduHerald Group: Learn more at https://GuardYourCard.com

It's Rachel's last day in Paris, and Van's dropping loaves (gross)! They talk about the closing statements from the Diddy trial with Yodit Tewolde before getting into quick hitters, Zohran Mamdani's victory, and the use of the n-word by That Mexican OT. 00:00 - Welcome! 03:47 - Rachel's Paris call 14:37 - Yodit Tewolde joins us! 43:06 - The NBA draft 51:22 - Chuck Schumer is Hospitalized During the Heat Wave 57:05 - Trump is called "daddy" by NATO's secretary-general 1:11:50 - Zohran Mamdani's victory in the New York primary 1:24:02 - Draymond Green and the punch 1:33:25 - That Mexican OT Saying the N-word 1:44:31 - Thanks for watching! Hosts: Van Lathan and Rachel Lindsay Guest: Yodit Tewolde Producers: Donnie Beacham and Ashleigh Smith Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Diddy closing arguments begin, Livvy Done, NFL suspends unemployed Justin Tucker, the Bezos/Sanchez/Gonzalez wedding, Eric Menedez finally graduates, Maz's newest failure, and Jim's Picks: Top War Songs.  Bentley doubles down on his athletic feats... and adds a new whopper. Unemployed Justin Tucker is FINALLY suspended from a job he doesn't have. Andy Green is still posting and he's still having issues with his "mediocre" content. Chuck the Freak had a very cryptic tweet last night. Drew has been watching too much Catfish. Erik Menendez got a college degree in prison. It only took him 35 years. New internet hot girl alert! Alicia Huggins is breaking the internet after she made an appearance at the College World Series. Danny Wolf's older brother cried like a baby at the NBA Draft. Hopefully Danny doesn't have his genes. We call Maz early because he's got a graduation party. Maz almost caught a foul ball yesterday, but Kathy got it instead. The Detroit Tigers won another series. Caitlin Clark is the most despised person in the WNBA. Maz hates Pam Ward too. Maz goes even deeper on random WNBA stuff. Drew & Maz get off over the "Rick Camp Game." We had to go first. Bye, Maz. Breaking News: Former Tampa Bay Ray Wander Franco found guilty. Ayatollah Khamenei declared victory over America. Whatever, you win. Donald Trump is expected to meet with Iran next week. He doesn't care if there's a deal or not. The Bezos/Sanchez/Gonzalez wedding is underway. Yay! Diddy closing statements started up today. The circus is finally almost over. The new Golden Bachelor is part of "the cult." And he doesn't want any old bags. Adam Sandler is touring. He'll be at Little Caesars Arena in October. Sydney Sweeney looks gross in her new movie. A new Bonerline. Jim's Picks: Top Ten Songs About War If you'd like to help support the show… consider subscribing to our YouTube Channel, Facebook, Instagram and Twitter (Drew Lane, Marc Fellhauer, Trudi Daniels, Jim Bentley and BranDon).

Episode 1740 - brought to you by our incredible sponsors: Cash App: For a limited time only, new Cash App users can use our exclusive code to earn some additional cash. Just download Cash App & sign up! Use our exclusive referral code HARDFACTOR in your profile, send $5 to a friend within 14 days, and you'll get $10 dropped right into your account.  Inocogni - Take your personal data back with Incogni! Get 60% off an annual plan at ⁠incogni.com/HARDFACTOR⁠ and use code HARDFACTOR at checkout. Lucy - Let's level up your nicotine routine with Lucy.  Go to ⁠Lucy.co/HARDFACTOR⁠ and use promo code (HARDFACTOR) to get 20% off your first order. Lucy has a 30-day refund policy if you change your mind. Factor Meals - The Best Premade Meal Delivery Service on Earth - Get started at factormeals.com/hardfactor50off and use code hardfactor50off to get 50% off your first box plus free shipping. Timestamps: (00:00:00) - Florida Strip Clubs and US National Team Soccer (00:09:07) - Man tragically lightninged to death on his honeymoon in Florida (00:13:19) - Diddy gettin Slippery - is he gonna get off,, again?? (00:27:24) - Beach Lifeguard survives being IMPALED by her tower umbrella (00:33:25) - Armenian PM exposes priest and offers to expose his pen!s as proof (00:40:31) - The Frog of War: Daddy Trump edition THANK YOU for listening and supporting the pod. Join the official Hardo Hive community at patreon.com/hardfacor: bonus pods, discord chat, trivia with the hosts, and sometimes a little bit more. We love you, HAGFD/W!! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

After six weeks of intense testimony and cross-examination, the trial of Sean “Diddy” Combs is coming to a close. This week, both the prosecution and defense rested their cases and delivered closing arguments. Soon the case will be in the jury's hands.Today, style reporter Anne Branigin gives us an update on the defense's closing arguments, which will wrap up Friday. Then, court reporter Shayna Jacobs breaks down the potential strategy behind Combs's minimal defense presentation earlier in the week, how prosecutors approached closing arguments and the possible outcomes once the case is handed over to the jury. Today's show was produced by Peter Bresnan. It was edited by Reena Flores and mixed by Sean Carter. Thanks to Carla Spartos.Follow our coverage of the trial of Sean “Diddy” Combs on Spotify here.Subscribe to The Washington Post here.

Stef talks about a party she went to at her friend Ronnie Karem's house - yes, THAT Ronnie! Then they discuss their kids needing jobs and how they found jobs back in the day. Plus, they wonder how these kids are doing their drinking and who is supplying their alcohol. Before they rap, they talk about the P. Diddy trial which may be over by the time you listen.SkylightCal.com/FCOL for $30 off their 15 inch calendars.

After a delayed start to the defense’s closing arguments, things heated up quickly when Diddy’s lead attorney Marc Agnifilo began addressing jurors. Pacing and animated, Angifilo essentially mocked the prosecution point by point saying Diddy is on trial for his private sex life, keeping the streets of America safe from boxes of astroglide.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The defense wrapped its four-hour closing arguments this afternoon. It was their final attempt to sway the jury to find Diddy innocent of the five charges he is facing that, if convicted, could send him to prison for the rest of his life. Defense attorney Marc Agnifilo told jurors it takes courage to acquit and asked them to summon that courage, to do the right thing.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Dave and Chuck the Freak talk about Jason chairs in hotel rooms, Craigslist ad of guy needing help around the house posted picture of his penis, Mega Babe anti-chafing stick, woman who created Miracle Mop auctioning off her estate, what’s your ‘I do this now so future me doesn’t suffer’ thing?, guy beat a dude with a plunger, mobile home lifted by tornado, woman had 52 cats in motel room, undercover sting discovers dirty kitchen conditions, couple stranded on lake, gators arrive after jet ski broke down, Rays shortstop found guilty, Justin Tucker suspended, Jason Kelce stripped down to Speedo, Marlins player took ball to junk, Gronk invested in Apple, Brad Pitt has home robbed, Diddy trial closing arguments, Scarlett Johansson kisses co-star, Dune and Blade Runner director will direct next Bond movie, new Social Network movie, F1 opens in theaters, new Golden Bachelor, most expensive Star Wars toys, Sarah McLachlan can’t watch the dog commercials either, cop resigned after getting busted pick pocketing during traffic stop, Patches Magickbeans, plane passenger threw tantrum, Prime Minister offered to show his penis to prove religion, nightmare neighbor, what’s the biggest food mistake you’ve made?, woman who shoved nachos down wife’s pants during fight, Ask Dave & Chuck The Freak, why does his aunt keep bringing up aunt porn?, buddy wanted to borrow suit jacket, guy wants to reclaim the pineapple, GF won’t start family unless married, old driver crashed into liquor store, utility worker’s truck hit by truck while up in cherry picker, and more!

 Iran cracks down on alleged dissidents, the Supreme Court rules against Planned Parenthood, and the Abrego Garcia saga continues. Get the facts first on Evening Wire.