Podcasts about ricoeur

Emiliana Mangone, Guido Gili"Speranza. Passione del possibile"Vita e Pensierowww.vitaepensiero.itCi sono parole che crediamo di conoscere perfettamente perché indicano realtà che fanno parte della nostra esperienza quotidiana. Una di queste è speranza. Come hanno detto in tanti, da Aristotele a oggi, la speranza è un bisogno universale e una struttura della stessa vita umana, perché senza speranza non possiamo vivere. Come esperienza soggettiva essa si esprime in forma di emozione, sentimento, tratto della personalità, abito di azione, virtù. Non è però solo qualcosa che accade ‘nelle' persone, ma anche ‘tra' le persone. Speriamo non solo per noi stessi, ma anche per gli altri, con gli altri e a volte contro gli altri. Persone e gruppi diversi ripongono la loro speranza in realtà diverse: nella vita oltre la morte, nella felicità in questo mondo, nella sicurezza materiale, nell'amore, nella salute del corpo o nel benessere spirituale… E ci sono poi anche le ‘grandi' speranze delle classi sociali, delle generazioni, delle nazioni o dell'intera umanità.Facendo riferimento alle scienze umane e sociali, alla letteratura e alla storia dell'arte, i due sociologi Guido Gili ed Emiliana Mangone percorrono a tutto tondo il tema della speranza interrogandosi, ad esempio, sui suoi caratteri propri; sul rapporto con il desiderio o l'attesa; sulle forme della sua relazione con la trascendenza. E ancora: perché in certe epoche e luoghi la speranza nasce o risorge prepotente, mentre in altri si isterilisce e sembra sparire dall'orizzonte della vita personale e associata? E soprattutto, perché oggi c'è bisogno di speranza, la «passione del possibile», come la definiscono Jürgen Moltmann e Paul Ricoeur.Guido Gili è docente di Sociologia nell'Università Gregoriana e di Teoria della comunicazione nell'Università della Santa Croce. Già preside e prorettore nell'Università del Molise, ha anche insegnato nelle Università di Bologna e LUISS «Guido Carli» di Roma. I suoi principali interessi di ricerca riguardano la teoria della comunicazione e la sociologia della cultura e dell'educazione. Tra le sue più recenti pubblicazioni: The History and Theory of Post-Truth Communication (con Giovanni Maddalena, 2020), La credibilità politica (con Massimiliano Panarari, 2020), Comunicare. Persone, relazioni, media (con Giovanni Boccia Artieri e Fausto Colombo, 2022), La differenza che arricchisce. Comunicazione e transculturalità (con Alberto Gil, 2022).Emiliana Mangone è professoressa ordinaria di Sociologia dei processi culturali e comunicativi presso il Dipartimento di Scienze Politiche e della Comunicazione dell'Università degli Studi di Salerno. Dirige il Narratives and Social Changes-International Research Group (NaSC-IRG, 2020-2026). I suoi interessi di ricerca si rivolgono ai sistemi culturali e istituzionali, con particolare attenzione alle rappresentazioni sociali, ai processi relazionali, alla conoscenza e alla narrazione come elementi chiave dell'azione, agli studi sulle migrazioni, nonché allo studio del pensiero di Pitirim A. Sorokin. Recentemente ha pubblicato: Pitirim A. Sorokin: Rediscovering a Master of Sociology (2023).IL POSTO DELLE PAROLEascoltare fa pensarewww.ilpostodelleparole.itDiventa un supporter di questo podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/il-posto-delle-parole--1487855/support.

durée : 00:51:11 - Les Nuits de France Culture - par : Philippe Garbit - En avril 2000, l'émission "Le bien commun" avait invité le philosophe Paul Ricoeur. A propos du thème "La justice et le pardon", il répondait à la question suivante : "comment passe-t-on de la guerre à la paix et en quoi la justice peut-elle nous aider à sortir de cette terreur ?" - réalisation : Mydia Portis-Guérin - invités : Paul Ricœur Philosophe (1913-2005)

Recorded 13th February 2025. A hybrid seminar by Prof Cathriona Russell (School of Religion, Theology and Peace Studies) as part of the Medical and Health Humanities Seminar Series. Healthcare faces comparable challenges to those of every other sector in society in the context of a changing climate. In relation to ongoing international agreements, healthcare will, for example, have to enact mitigation strategies for net-zero in its contributions to emissions, currently c.4.5% of global GHG emissions. More significantly however healthcare will need to design strategies for adaptation, aiming at resilience in ongoing provision and effectiveness in securing justice; resilience in the face of more extensive and more frequent temperature and precipitation extremes, sea level rise, changes in land-use and food production; and resilience in social conditions, in housing provision, in providing access to health care, in disease prevention, all while demographies continually shift (age and gender, poverty, and displacement)[1]. The expected continuing increase in intensity and frequency of adverse events will worsen health outcomes and health inequalities, which themselves are drivers of climate change. If healthcare contributes to the ‘good life' through its impact on health, then a key measure of its effectiveness will be its commitment to building capability e.g. for preventative medicine (A. Sen), and for ‘living with and for each other in just institutions' (P. Ricoeur). [1] IPCC, 2023 Summary for Policy Makers, https://www.ipcc.ch/report/sixth-assessment-report-cycle/ Learn more at www.tcd.ie/trinitylongroomhub

Is magic inherently evil, or is this a cultural construct shaped by power, religion, and philosophy? In this video, we explore the historical and theological framing of magic as 'evil,' from ancient texts like The Book of Enoch to the European witch trials and the controversial ideas of Aleister Crowley. We'll examine the concept of evil itself, from Augustine's privatio boni to Nietzsche's critique of moral binaries, and explore how magic has been interpreted in monotheistic, polytheistic, and modern esoteric traditions. Join us as we challenge the assumptions surrounding magic and evil and uncover their complex interplay across cultures and time. CONNECT & SUPPORT

[NOUVELLE SERIE] "Ma famille" en compagnie de Nicole Prieur, philosophe, psy, hypnothérapeute et experte dans les relations familiales. Dans ce deuxième épisode, Anne Ghesquière et Nicole Prieur abordent un sujet au cœur des relations familiales : le besoin d'amour, de reconnaissance, ses illusions et ses limites. Comment cet amour familial, aussi essentiel soit-il, peut-il parfois fragiliser au lieu de soutenir ?Durant 6 semaines, Anne et Nicole explorent dans cette série ce qui nous relie, nous construit et parfois nous freine dans nos sphères familiales. Découvrons quelle est notre place dans la famille, ce que les lieux disent de nous, comment gérer les conflits, les silences et les blessures pour en faire des forces d'évolution.Avant-propos et précautions à l'écoute du podcastRecevez un mercredi sur deux l'inspirante newsletter Métamorphose par Anne GhesquièreFaites le TEST gratuit de La Roue Métamorphose avec les 9 piliers de votre vie !Suivez nos RS : Insta, Facebook & TikTokAbonnez-vous gratuitement sur Apple Podcast / Spotify / Deezer / CastBox/ YoutubeSoutenez Métamorphose en rejoignant la Tribu MétamorphoseQuelques citations avec Nicole Prieur : "L'amour tout puissant, c'est une invention de nos siècles récents.""Quand on s'est senti aimé, soutenu, reconnu, on a plus de force.""La souffrance vient quand on ne se sent pas suffisamment reconnu."Thèmes abordés lors du podcast avec Nicole Prieur : 00:00 Introduction02:36 L'amour est-il automatique quand on a des enfants ?06:03 Qu'est-ce qu'aimer véritablement ?08:28 Les dangers d'un amour maternel excessif.10:37 L'importance de se reconnaitre soi-même.12:31 Les 5 étapes du parcours de la reconnaissance définies par Ricoeur.20:25 Comment échapper à notre besoin de reconnaissance ?À écouter : Nos places et nos rôles dans la famille (Ep.1)Retrouvez les ouvrages de Nicole Prieur dont Ces trahisons qui nous libèrent aux éditions Robert Laffont, et le titre de son dernier livre chez Ernster Editions L'argent, poison ou trésor. On peut aussi retrouver toute son actualité et ses livres sur son site internet, www.parolesdepsy.com.Photo DR Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

In this episode we discuss a few sections in Ricoeur's collection of essays titled "The Conflict of Interpretation". We discuss why Ricoeur sees Marx, Nietzsche, and Freud as masters of suspicion and how that should help us think about religion, ourselves, and our modern world. Intro (00:00:45) From Descartes to Marx, Nietzsche, and Freud (00:04:45) The Function of Religion in Marx, Nietzsche, and Freud (00:19:19) We are All Armchair Psychologists (00:38:05)

Foundations of Hermeneutics:1.1 Definition and origins of hermeneutics1.2 Historical development: from biblical exegesis to general theory of interpretation1.3 Key figures in early hermeneutics (Schleiermacher, Dilthey)1.4 The hermeneutic circle: understanding parts and wholes Contemporary Hermeneutic Theories:2.1 Heidegger's ontological turn in hermeneutics 2.2 Gadamer's philosophical hermeneutics 2.3 Ricoeur's critical hermeneutics2.4 Habermas and the hermeneutics of suspicion 2.5 Feminist and postcolonial approaches to hermeneuticsApplications and Implications of Hermeneutics:3.1 Hermeneutics in literary theory and criticism3.2 Legal hermeneutics and constitutional interpretation3.3 Hermeneutics in social sciences and cultural studies3.4 The role of hermeneutics in intercultural communication3.5 Challenges and critiques of hermeneutic approaches3.6 Future directions: digital hermeneutics and AI interpretationBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/philosophy-acquired--5939304/support.

Dans cet épisode, on se demande comment on devient soi-même et on explore des réponses proposées par des penseurs et penseuses de l'Antiquité à nos jours.Au programme :• Être à la fois la pierre et le sculpteur avec Friedrich Nietzsche• La maxime “Connais-toi toi-même” du temple de Delphes• L'influence des réseaux sociaux sur la construction de notre identité personnelle• Comment nos actions révèlent notre identité avec Hannah Arendt• L'importance de l'introspection avec Socrate• Accepter son destin avec les Stoïciens• Découvrir son potentiel latent avec l'Alchimiste de Paulo Coelho• Comment les valeurs morales sont à la base de qui nous sommes avec Vaclav Havel• L'autodétermination avec le développement personnel• Trouver l'équilibre avec le concept d'Ikigai• Explorer l'identité narrative avec Paul RicœurRejoignez-moi pour cette exploration philosophique et découvrez des perspectives fascinantes sur la construction de notre identité.

Våren 2023 gav Øystein Brekke, professor ved OsloMet, ut boka Religionshermeneutikk. I boka argumenterer han for ei fleirfagleg, konglomerativ, tilnærming til religion og livssyn i skulen - og for at skulefaget må ha ein livssynsopen fagontologi. Denne episoden er den andre samtalen Øystein har med Inge om tankane i boka. Målet er både å opne opp diskusjonane i boka for fleire, og å kunne gå djupare inn på det som vert diskutert. Dersom du har spørsmål, innspel, kritikk eller kommentarar til episoden kan du sende dei til krlepodden@outlook.com *Her er eit knippe lenker og lesetips for lyttarar som vil gå meir inn i stoffet frå episoden * Store norske leksikon om Paul Ricoeur. (https://snl.no/Paul_Ricoeur) Andreassen, Øyvind Soltun og Jørgensen, Camilla Stabel (2022). «Et ressursperspektiv på uenighet. Analyse av kjerneelementet Utforsking av religioner og livssyn med ulike metoder.» Prismet, 73(2–3), 23–49. https://doi.org/10.5617/pri.9696 Anker, Trine (2018). «Hvordan utforme kjerneelementer i KRLE / Religion og etikk?» Religion og livssyn. Tidsskrift for religionslærerforeningen i Norge, 30(1), 2–3. Brekke, Øystein (2016). «Arkeologi og teleologi. Paul Ricoeurs dialektiske kulturteori.» I M.P. Clausen og L. Sandbeck (red.), Og teologi. Festskrift til Carsten Pallesen (51–73), Eksistensen. https://oda.oslomet.no/oda-xmlui/handle/10642/4274 Brekke, Øystein og Æsøy, Knut Ove (2023). «Livsmeistring og livsmeining: KRLE som undringspraksis.», side 87-100 I: Folkehelse og livsmestring - med utgangspunkt i fagene (https://www.universitetsforlaget.no/folkehelse-og-livsmestring). Universitetsforlaget. Krogseth, Otto (2009). «Religion og kultur. Forsøk på en forholdsbestemmelse.» I A. Brunvoll mfl. (red.)_ Religion og kultur. Ein fleirfagleg samtale_ (32–45). Universitetsforlaget. Gilhus, Ingvild Sælid (2009). «Hva er religion i dag? Religionsbegrep og religionsvitenskap.» I A. Brunvoll mfl. (red.) Religion og kultur. Ein fleirfagleg samtale (19–31). Universitetsforlaget. Skeie, Geir (2006). «What do we mean by ‘religion' in education? On disciplinary knowledge and knowledge in the classroom.» I K. Tirri (red.) Religion, spirituality and identity (85–100). Peter Lang Publishing Group. Øystein si bok finn du her: https://www.universitetsforlaget.no/religionshermeneutikk Øystein har og laga ei religionsfagleg og religionsdidaktisk studentordliste (https://www.academia.edu/103426850/Religionsfagleg_og_religionsdidaktisk_studentordliste?fbclid=IwAR1h4TFYOv9OSUDR_RLAiTqZHdDVUCR3XuNdETEQpGZmeMgxqfTj2b8llYg). Der kan du finne forklaringar på mange av omgrepa vi brukar i samtalen. Sitatet som opnar episoden er frå side 164 i boka til Øystein, der han siterer Otto Krogseth frå kapittelet "Religion og kultur. Forsøk på en forholdsbestemmelse". Her er sitatet i sin heilskap: "Kultur og religioner er ikke «første ordens»-størrelser, der begreper avbilder eller representerer foreliggende forhold, tilgjengelig for direkte observasjon. I stedet har vi å gjøre med abstrakte, konstruerte «andre ordens»-størrelser, diskursbegreper der meningsinnholdet ikke er tilgjengelig uavhengig av «sekundære», forskjellige og kontekstbaserte forhandlinger omkring begrepene." (Krogseth 2009: 33) Musikk av Lee Rosevere «Thought Bubbles» https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ «All the Answers» https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

durée : 00:51:11 - Les Nuits de France Culture - par : Philippe Garbit - En avril 2000, l'émission "Le bien commun" avait invité le philosophe Paul Ricoeur. A propos du thème "La justice et le pardon", il répondait à la question suivante : "comment passe-t-on de la guerre à la paix et en quoi la justice peut-elle nous aider à sortir de cette terreur ?" - réalisation : Mydia Portis-Guérin - invités : Paul Ricœur Philosophe (1913-2005)

durée : 00:55:00 - Les Nuits de France Culture - par : Philippe Garbit, Antoine Garapon - En avril 2000, l'émission "Le bien commun" avait invité le philosophe Paul Ricoeur. A propos du thème "La justice et le pardon", il répondait à la question suivante : "comment passe-t-on de la guerre à la paix et en quoi la justice peut-elle nous aider à sortir de cette terreur ?" - invités : Paul Ricœur Philosophe (1913-2005)

Falls euch cogitamus gefällt, lasst bitte ein Abo da und/oder empfehlt uns weiter. Abonnieren könnt ihr uns auch auf YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC2YdZ5ryFQ32Zd75m2AW5cw Unterstützen könnt ihr uns ebenfalls: paypal.me/cogitamus oder cogitamus@posteo.de. Schaut auch mal auf UNCUT vorbei: https://www.uncut.at/. Paul Ricœur (1913-2005) ist zusammen mit Emmanuel Levinas einer der bedeutsamsten frankophoner Vertreter der Phänomenologie-Rezipienten. Der hier wiedergegebene Aufsatz „Phänomenologie der Religion“ beinhaltet Grenzen der phänomenologischen Religionsphilosophie und die sogenannten hermeneutischen Zirkel. Nächste Folgen: Die Farbe Lila, Leibniz und der Wiener Kreis; Jean-Jaques Rosseau; Weibliches Körperbewusstsein; Oscar-Predictions Timemarker 00:00 Intro 04:08 Biographie Ricoeur 07:20 Drei Grenzen der Religionsphilosophie 25:16 Fazit & Schluss Literatur/Links/Quellen Vorlesungen Uni Wien, wikipedia Paul Ricoeur – An den Grenzen der Hermeneutik Bildnachweise: https://partiallyexaminedlife.com/wp-content/uploads/RICOEUR.jpg; https://philitt.fr/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/ricoeur.jpg; https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/41ukRWHtaiL.jpg; https://pixabay.com/get/g3ef6f00c9e6e11f89ab8db7d385ef30699249cb5d1d43c3ed9e1c7dcdca05bc4c882127b91a101555b591bdbcf76a06ecd830ea8c3e49c6c4c45883f2c21eefcbb8ae29ca18c58a83f0045d87152ff3d_640.jpg

durée : 00:19:58 - Les Nuits de France Culture - par : Philippe Garbit - Le philosophe Paul Ricoeur exposait dans une émission radiodiffusée le 18/12/1957 comment la pensée d'Edmund Husserl, philosophe allemand, avait marqué une rupture dans l'histoire de la philosophie. L'émission s'appelait "Connaissance de l'homme : La phénoménologie" par Paul Ricoeur. - invités : Paul Ricœur Philosophe (1913-2005)

durée : 00:59:58 - Les Nuits de France Culture - par : Philippe Garbit - "Croyez-vous que l'angoisse du temps présent a des caractères spécifiques ?" C'est la question à laquelle tentait de répondre Paul Ricœur dans sa première apparition radiophonique. Dans une seconde occasion, dix ans plus tard, c'est sur le rapport entre Freud et l'art qu'il s'exprime.

durée : 03:05:00 - Les Nuits de France Culture - par : Albane Penaranda -

Steven DeLay earned his PhD in philosophy at Oxford in 2017 and is the author of several books of philosophy and fiction, including a handful now with Wipf and Stock. In this standalone interview, Steven talks Kierkegaard, phenomenology, philosophy for Protestants, and the relationship between theology and fiction. PODCAST LINKS: Blog post: https://wipfandstock.com/blog/2023/02/07/standalone-episode-steven-delay-kierkegaard-phenomenology-and-the-relationship-between-philosophy-and-theology-and-fiction/ Steven's author page: https://wipfandstock.com/author/steven-delay/ Steven's website: https://stevendelay.com/ Steven's academia.edu page: https://oxford.academia.edu/StevenDeLay Temple Coffee Roasters: https://templecoffee.com/ CONNECT: Website: https://wipfandstock.com/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/wipfandstock Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/wipfandstock Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/wipfandstock/ YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCvht9V0Pndgvwh5vkpe0GGw SOURCES MENTIONED: Bergo, Bettina. Anxiety: A Philosophical History. Chrétien, Jean-Louis. Conscience et roman 1: La conscience au grand jour. Clemente, Matthew. “As If It Were True: An Interview with Richard Kearney.” DeLay, Steven. In the Spirit: A Phenomenology of Faith. ———. Phenomenology in France: A Philosophical and Theological Introduction. Dostoevsky, Fyodor. Crime and Punishment. Falque, Emmanuel. Crossing the Rubicon: The Borderlands of Philosophy and Theology. Fowles, John. The Magus: A Novel. Graves, Adam J. The Phenomenology of Revelation in Heidegger, Marion, and Ricoeur. Heidegger, Martin. Being and Time. Hopp, Walter. Phenomenology: A Contemporary Introduction. Kierkegaard, Soren. Fear and Trembling. Marion, Jean-Luc. Being Given: Toward a Phenomenology of Givenness. ———. A Brief Apology for a Catholic Moment. ———. God Without Being: Hors-Texte. ———. The Idol and Distance: Five Studies. ———. Negative Certainties. ———. Reduction and Givenness: Investigations of Husserl, Heidegger, and Phenomenology. Pascal, Blaise. Pensées. Plantinga, Alvin. Warranted Christian Belief. Rudd, Anthony. Painting and Presence: Why Paintings Matter. Sellars, Wilfrid. Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind. OUTLINE: (01:28) – Decaf coffee, black coffee (04:14) – Favorite books of 2022 (07:09) – Rice University – Oxford University (09:43) – A conversion via Kierkegaard (12:35) – Literature – philosophy – phenomenology – theology (16:52) – Barth, Bultmann, and Rudolf Otto (18:46) – Why should Christians read philosophy? (23:05) – The merits of reading atheists and agnostics (29:13) – Heidegger, onto-theology, and negative theology (32:45) – Phenomenology a Catholic science? (39:38) – Philosophy for Protestants (41:30) – The GOAT of phenomenology (44:16) – The hermeneutical critique of phenomenology (47:41) – Desert island: phenomenology books (49:38) – Philosophy and fiction (59:31) – Steven's forthcoming work

Have you ever been so moved by watching a film that you'd call it a religious experience? Jay & Joel take a look at the movies that refuse to adhere to our common labels of "sacred" and "secular", yet still have potential to move us closer to God and truth. Tune in to hear how watching a certain movie helped Joel realize his familial identity; stick around for "beginner" movie recommendations from a real film critic.Dr. Jay David Miller teaches English at George Fox University and serves as an associate editor for the journal Quaker Religious Thought.Dr. Joel Mayward teaches theology and Christian ministries & arts at George Fox University.If you enjoy listening to the George Fox Talks podcast and would like to watch, too, check out our channel on YouTube! We also have a web page that features all of our podcasts, a sign-up for our weekly email update, and publications from the George Fox University community.

“De mens wenst goed te leven, met en voor anderen, in rechtvaardige instituties” Dit is volgens de twintigste-eeuwse Franse filosoof Paul Ricoeur het streven van het menselijk handelen. Wie bedoelde Ricoeur met de meesters van het wantrouwen en hoe beoordeelde hij hen? Hoe keek hij aan tegen dat het feit dat instituties snel vooral om zichzelf gaan draaien? En zien we in de politiek van Emmanuel Macron – die zijn student-assistent was – iets terug van het denken van Ricoeur? Te gast is Henk den Uijl De denker die centraal staat: Ricoeur

While Heidegger and Derrida both contributed groundbreaking reflections on hospitality (and “hostipitality”), they failed to recognize that the host-guest relationship can only succeed if it is correlated with the notion of mutual guardianship. The lecture will describe historic guardian civilizations and then turn to Ricoeur's linguistic hospitality as a possible blueprint for future cultural hospitality. However, the latter scenario will have no need for a third party, i.e., a “translator” who mediates between host and guest. The challenge consists of designing a host-guest relationship in which both parties become each other's translators - and guardians.Tamara Albertini is a professor and department chair at the university of Hawai‘i at Manoa. Professor Albertini's research in Renaissance philosophy focuses on Nicholas of Cusa (mathematics, cosmology), Marsilio Ficino (metaphysics, aesthetics) and Charles de Bovelles. Within Islamic philosophy, Professor Tamara Albertini's publications aim at reintroducing the vigor and vision of Muslim intellectual contributions from the classical period. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Comment devient-on l'historien des penseurs et de leurs idées ? François Dosse, professeur émérite à l'Université Paris XII, a, notamment, rédigé une biographie intellectuelle de Paul Ricoeur. Proche du philosophe protestant, cet homme de science publie « Macron ou les illusions perdues », (Le Passeur, 409 p. 21 €). Pour Fréquence Protestante, il évoque son parcours personnel et propose une analyse de notre époque.

It seems more than ever that our present era is one of misunderstanding others—their motives, their reasons, their practices, and their beliefs. Is there a quick remedy to this, such as being more objective? Is objectivity even possible, especially given how incomplete our knowledge of others is? Constantine Sandis (University of Hertfordshire, UK) is Professor of Philosophy, with a special interest in ethics, action, and understanding others. He discusses the importance of shared practices and has some surprising thoughts about the role of empathy.Living Philosophy is brought to you by Philosophy2u.com.Host:Dr Todd MeiSponsors:Philosophy2u.comHillary Hutchinson, Career and Change Coach at Transitioning Your LifeHermeneutics in Real LifeGeoffrey Moore, author of The Infinite Staircase     Links Related to this Episode:Constantine Sandis (personal website)Akrasia (Weakness of the Will)Argument from Illusion (Wikipedia)“Eyebrows on Fleek Vine by Peaches Monroee” (YouTube)Prejudice and Bias (YouTube)Ludwig Wittgenstein (Wikipedia)Paul Ricoeur (Wikipedia)Music: Earth and the Moon, by KetsaLogo Art: Angela Silva, Dattura Studios

Enrico Filippini, negli anni più importanti del secondo Novecento, ha attraversato il pensiero filosofico, le turbolenze politiche, la critica letteraria, le neoavanguardie culturali.Erano tempi in cui le avanguardie storiche europee, si dedicavano alla ricerca di nuovi linguaggi e il senso di discussione e collettività, orientava ogni movimento artistico e culturale.Filippini, quando lasciò la Svizzera, in età giovanile, esprimeva già in pieno le sue qualità a tutto campo. A partire dai primi studi intrisi di cultura mitteleuropea: dalla traduzione di Husserl "La crisi delle scienze europee", fino ad arrivare all'intenso anno di studi a Parigi tra il '61 e il '62, dove frequentò il "Collège de France", con Ricoeur e Merleau- Ponty e il gruppo "Tel Quel", con Barthes e Derrida, fino ad arrivare all'interesse che coltivò per il pensiero di Jacques Lacan.La sua intensa attività di traduttore, non si limitava ad introdurre opere e autori nuovi, ma agiva nello scenario editoriale italiano, in modo estremamente acuto.Il suo primo testo narrativo, "Settembre", venne pubblicato sul Menabò 5, di Vittorini e Calvino.Questa pubblicazione, poteva aprire la strada a nuove conquiste letterarie, ma “Nani" sembrava evitare tutto quello che avrebbe potuto rappresentarlo compiutamente, così, mantenne sempre un rapporto aperto e controverso con la scrittura.Le importanti collaborazioni di Filippini con alcune case editrici italiane, prima di tutto la Feltrinelli - in cui il suo lavoro si espresse con travolgente vitalità - mostrano la sua notevole capacità di incarnare la spinta giovanile che intendeva cambiare la cultura, e attraverso questa, il mondo.Nel ruolo di traduttore, Filippini agiva secondo un'ottica militante, in quello di redattore culturale, divulgatore mediatico e critico letterario, agiva secondo una visione che intendeva come lui stesso ha scritto: "rompere le croste ideologiche imposte", per "portare l'uomo alla coscienza dell'inautenticità". Tutto questo, oltre l'illusione, per mirare allo "smascheramento" come esigenza della cultura contemporanea.Intanto, nel clima di dissoluzione dello storicismo marxista, Enrico Filippini fondava insieme ad altri il Gruppo '63, sulle tracce del Gruppo '47, che conobbe da vicino su invito di Gunter Grass. Dal 1976, intraprese un'intensa attività giornalistica come redattore delle pagine culturali di "Repubblica", scrivendo circa 500 articoli.Una collaborazione che durò fino al 1988, anno della sua scomparsa.In questo documentario, il percorso narrativo si muove dagli aspetti più umani e intimi, affidati ai ricordi della figlia Concita - che evocano la presenza profondamente percettiva e seduttiva di “Nani” - alla costruzione del testo per il lavoro teatrale “l'ultimo viaggio”, basato sui diari di Concita Filippini e da lei curato insieme a Giuliano Compagno, con la regia e l'interpretazione di Marco Solari.Gli effetti storici del pensiero e dell'azione di “Nani” - così veniva chiamato a Milano, o Nanni, così veniva chiamato a Roma - in questo lavoro diventano l'indicatore per "decifrare i moti più segreti, più pericolosi e inevitabili del tempo", intrecciandosi con le testimonianze di Giacomo Marramao, Paolo Mauri e Gianni Emilio Simonetti, che in circostanze diverse, hanno conosciuto e collaborato intensamente con “Nani”.Così il racconto, che si snoda in due episodi, attraversa l'Italia delle avanguardie intellettuali milanesi e gli anni trascorsi a Roma, svelando una complessa riflessione sulla scrittura e sul linguaggio, evidenziata dalla speciale relazione di “Nani”con gli aspetti filosofici e psicoanalitici, sollecitati anche dalle esperienze del periodo parigino, sulle tracce di Jacques Lacan.In questo modo emerge lo “sguardo obliquo” di “Nani” e l'azione di “infinito corteggiamento della vita, dell'altro/a, ma anche della morte”, come ha scritto Paolo Mauri, nella prefazione al libro che riprende la sceneggiatura mai rappresentata: Byron & Shelley.

Enrico Filippini, negli anni più importanti del secondo Novecento, ha attraversato il pensiero filosofico, le turbolenze politiche, la critica letteraria, le neoavanguardie culturali.Erano tempi in cui le avanguardie storiche europee, si dedicavano alla ricerca di nuovi linguaggi e il senso di discussione e collettività, orientava ogni movimento artistico e culturale.Filippini, quando lasciò la Svizzera, in età giovanile, esprimeva già in pieno le sue qualità a tutto campo. A partire dai primi studi intrisi di cultura mitteleuropea: dalla traduzione di Husserl "La crisi delle scienze europee", fino ad arrivare all'intenso anno di studi a Parigi tra il '61 e il '62, dove frequentò il "Collège de France", con Ricoeur e Merleau- Ponty e il gruppo "Tel Quel", con Barthes e Derrida, fino ad arrivare all'interesse che coltivò per il pensiero di Jacques Lacan. La sua intensa attività di traduttore, non si limitava ad introdurre opere e autori nuovi, ma agiva nello scenario editoriale italiano, in modo estremamente acuto.Il suo primo testo narrativo, "Settembre", venne pubblicato sul Menabò 5, di Vittorini e Calvino.Questa pubblicazione, poteva aprire la strada a nuove conquiste letterarie, ma “Nani “sembrava evitare tutto quello che avrebbe potuto rappresentarlo compiutamente, così, mantenne sempre un rapporto aperto e controverso con la scrittura.Le importanti collaborazioni di Filippini con alcune case editrici italiane, prima di tutto la Feltrinelli - in cui il suo lavoro si espresse con travolgente vitalità - mostrano la sua notevole capacità di incarnare la spinta giovanile che intendeva cambiare la cultura, e attraverso questa, il mondo. Nel ruolo di traduttore, Filippini agiva secondo un'ottica militante, in quello di redattore culturale, divulgatore mediatico e critico letterario, agiva secondo una visione che intendeva come lui stesso ha scritto: "rompere le croste ideologiche imposte", per "portare l'uomo alla coscienza dell'inautenticità". Tutto questo, oltre l'illusione, per mirare allo "smascheramento" come esigenza della cultura contemporanea. Intanto, nel clima di dissoluzione dello storicismo marxista, Enrico Filippini fondava insieme ad altri il Gruppo '63, sulle tracce del Gruppo '47, che conobbe da vicino su invito di Gunter Grass. Dal 1976, intraprese un'intensa attività giornalistica come redattore delle pagine culturali di "Repubblica", scrivendo circa 500 articoli.Una collaborazione che durò fino al 1988, anno della sua scomparsa.In questo documentario, il percorso narrativo si muove dagli aspetti più umani e intimi, affidati ai ricordi della figlia Concita - che evocano la presenza profondamente percettiva e seduttiva di “Nani” - alla costruzione del testo per il lavoro teatrale “l'ultimo viaggio”, basato sui diari di Concita Filippini e da lei curato insieme a Giuliano Compagno, con la regia e l'interpretazione di Marco Solari.Gli effetti storici del pensiero e dell'azione di “Nani” - così veniva chiamato a Milano, o Nanni, così veniva chiamato a Roma - in questo lavoro diventano l'indicatore per "decifrare i moti più segreti, più pericolosi e inevitabili del tempo", intrecciandosi con le testimonianze di Giacomo Marramao, Paolo Mauri e Gianni Emilio Simonetti, che in circostanze diverse, hanno conosciuto e collaborato intensamente con “Nani”. Così il racconto, che si snoda in due episodi, attraversa l'Italia delle avanguardie intellettuali milanesi e gli anni trascorsi a Roma, svelando una complessa riflessione sulla scrittura e sul linguaggio, evidenziata dalla speciale relazione di “Nani”con gli aspetti filosofici e psicoanalitici, sollecitati anche dalle esperienze del periodo parigino, sulle tracce di Jacques Lacan.In questo modo emerge lo “sguardo obliquo” di “Nani” e l'azione di “infinito corteggiamento della vita, dell'altro/a, ma anche della morte”, come ha scritto Paolo Mauri, nella prefazione al libro che riprende la sceneggiatura mai rappresentata: Byron & Shelley.

durée : 03:05:00 - Les Nuits de France Culture - par : Philippe Garbit - Par Emmanuel Hirsch - Avec Paul Ricoeur, Cornelius Castoriadis (historien), André Dumas (pasteur), Emmanuel Levinas (philosophe), Olivier Mongin et Jean-Marc Ferry - Réalisation Arlette Dave

Il est probablement le plus grand philosophe de la fin du XXe siècle et plus d'une dizaine d'années après sa mort, son influence sur la philosophie ne se dément pas. Philosophe, Paul Ricoeur a fortement infuencé l'éthique et la morale, la manière dont on lit les textes bibliques, et la manière dont on se comprend soi-même. Protestant, il a favorisé le dialogue entre la philosophie et la religion. Qui était donc Ricoeur et pourquoi sa pensée est-elle si cruciale pour le chistianisme du XXIe siècle ? Avec Olivier Abel et Pierre-Olivier Monteil.

Il est probablement le plus grand philosophe de la fin du XXe siècle et plus d'une dizaine d'années après sa mort, son influence sur la philosophie ne se dément pas. Philosophe, Paul Ricoeur a fortement infuencé l'éthique et la morale, la manière dont on lit les textes bibliques, et la manière dont on se comprend soi-même. Protestant, il a favorisé le dialogue entre la philosophie et la religion. Qui était donc Ricoeur et pourquoi sa pensée est-elle si cruciale pour le chistianisme du XXIe siècle ? Avec Olivier Abel et Pierre-Olivier Monteil.

We cry out for faith. The prayer of the parent for the child's salvation is the truest prayer we know. What if your church could be the safest place in the world to confess doubt, with a softness of heart that allows the possibility of belief? What if we could practice, together, Ricoeur's dual vows, the “vow of rigor” and the “vow of obedience”? To tell us your thoughts on this sermon, click through to the web posting and leave us a comment. Or, find us on social media: Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram. Or, email us the old-fashioned way: info@galileochurch.org. To contribute financially to the ongoing ministry of Galileo Church, find us on Venmo, Patreon, or PayPal, or just send a check to 6563 Teague Rd., Fort Worth, TX 76140.

This episode of "The Quest / How We Know," explores the great French Philosopher Paul Ricoeur's idea of a of knowledge that moves through three stages, or what I see as three levels of spiritual thought––precritical, critical, and postcritical. The third stage leads to what Ricoeur intriguingly called "the second naiveté" and what I refer to as "the second innocence" or "the second simplicity." The place of knowledge through authority is explored here. It is also proposed that Ricoeur's work leads to the reasonable conclusion that there are multiple ways of knowing.

Are there any prerequisites for claiming a right or liberty? Vexation over personal liberties may be caused by a fundamental misunderstanding about what a right is and how it works. Dr. David Utsler (North Central College, Texas) discusses how our identities are formed by the environment and how recognition of individual identities is a key requirement for possessing rights and liberties.Living Philosophy is brought to you by Philosophy2u.com. Host:Dr Todd MeiSponsors:Philosophy2u.comHillary Hutchinson, Career and Change Coach at Transitioning Your LifeMartin Bunzl, author of Thinking while WalkingHermeneutics in Real LifeLinks Related to this Episode:David Utsler (Discursive Dialectics)David's Blog on RightsHermeneuticsInternational Association for Environmental Philosophy (IAEP)Politics and the Other (Blog by Clarissa Muller)Robert FigueroaHans Georg-GadamerAxel HonnethRichard KearneyEmmanuel LevinasPaul RicoeurKenji Haroutunian and Access to the OutdoorsMusic: Earth and the Moon, by KetsaLogo Art: Angela Silva, Dattura Studios

durée : 00:19:58 - Les Nuits de France Culture - par : Philippe Garbit, Albane Penaranda, Mathilde Wagman - Le philosophe Paul Ricoeur exposait dans une émission radiodiffusée le 18/12/1957 comment la pensée d'Edmund Husserl, philosophe allemand, avait marqué une rupture dans l'histoire de la philosophie. L'émission s'appelait "Connaissance de l'homme : La phénoménologie" par Paul Ricoeur. - réalisation : Virginie Mourthé - invités : Paul Ricœur Philosophe (1913-2005)

Bien sabido es que la hermenéutica como temática de estudio y como herramienta esencial para la investigación ha sido ampliamente desarrollada a lo largo del siglo XX, representada en grandes pensadores como M. Heidegger, H. G. Gadamer y P. Ricoeur, quienes son antecedidos fundamentalmente por F. Schleiermacher y W. Dilthey. Pese a esto, en el siguiente trabajo nos proponemos rastrear los pasos que la hermenéutica o la teoría de la interpretación ocultamente fue dando a lo largo de la historia, sobre todo en el ocaso de la antigüedad y mucho antes de que estos filósofos la bautizaran como tal. Para ello nos adentraremos en el pensamiento de una de las figuras más importantes no solo de este período sino también de toda la filosofía cristiana: Agustín de Hipona. Por tanto, intentaremos exponer qué entendía el Hiponense por lo que hoy llamamos “hermenéutica”, qué lugar y valor le otorgaba dentro de todo su pensamiento y en la formación personal de cada hombre, y en qué rubros o ámbitos solía hacer uso de la misma como una teoría de la interpretación. Realizado esto, intentaremos mostrar cómo muchos rasgos agustinianos se encuentran implícitamente en la hermenéutica contemporánea

Season five of our podcast continues with another presentation from our 2020 annual conference: ‘Engaged Phenomenology' Online. This episode features Bence Peter Marosan, Budapest Business School, Pazmany Peter Catholic University.   ABSTRACT: In my presentation, I will attempt to show how a phenomenologically consequent interpretation of narrative identity would lead to eco-ethical and eco-political consequences. In particular, I will try to show the outlines of an eco-socialist theory, which implies an egalitarian approach of all living beings, and which is motivated by a phenomenological understanding of narrative identity. My presentation consists of two main parts. In the first part, I would like to treat the relationship between freedom, responsibility and – narratively conceived – personal identity, from a phenomenological point of view. The main authors of this part will be Husserl, Heidegger, Ricoeur, Lévinas and László Tengelyi. For Husserl, the narrative aspect of personal identity was already an important topic. For Heidegger, our own decisions constitute our identity. But in my opinion, there is a decisive factor, which was marginal for Heidegger, in regard of our identity and freedom: the Other. The Other's problem became central for Lévinas, and also for Ricoeur. László Tengelyi modified Ricoeur's account of narrative identity on a decisive point: he draws the attention to the role of “events of fate”; events that change the course of our lives fundamentally. In the second part I would like to show the ethical and political implications of the first part. The way in which we treat in fact the Other shows the best, who we are in real.  But the Other must not just be a human being; she or he can be a living being whatsoever. Here I would like to emphasize the eco-phenomenological motifs in Husserl (to this see also: Erazim Kohák); and I will try to show how such motifs lead to an egalitarian, eco-socialist view of everything which lives.   BIO: Bence Peter Marosan's PhD Studies were on Philosophy and Phenomenology, and conducted at the institutes of Eötvös Loránd University (Hungary), University College Dublin (Ireland), Bergische Universität Wuppertal (Germany), Université Paris 1, Panthéon-Sorbonne, École Normale Supérieure, (France). His affiliations are now with the Budapest Business School, Pázmány Péter Catholic University. His more important publications include two monographies on Husserl (in Hungarian), and he has edited two volumes on Marx and on László Tengelyi (in Hungarian). His research interests are Phenomenology (Husserl in particular), Hermeneutics, Philosophy of Mind, Political Philosophy, Eco-ethics, Eco-politics.   This recording is taken from the BSP Annual Conference 2020 Online: 'Engaged Phenomenology'. Organised with the University of Exeter and sponsored by Egenis and the Wellcome Centre for Cultures and Environments of Health. BSP2020AC was held online this year due to global concerns about the Coronavirus pandemic. For the conference our speakers recorded videos, our keynotes presented live over Zoom, and we also recorded some interviews online as well. Podcast episodes from BSP2020AC are soundtracks of those videos where we and the presenters feel the audio works as a standalone: https://www.britishphenomenology.org.uk/bsp-annual-conference-2020/   You can check out our forthcoming events here: https://www.britishphenomenology.org.uk/events/ The British Society for Phenomenology is a not-for-profit organisation set up with the intention of promoting research and awareness in the field of Phenomenology and other cognate arms of philosophical thought. Currently, the society accomplishes these aims through its journal, events, and podcast. Why not find out more, join the society, and subscribe to our journal the JBSP? https://www.britishphenomenology.org.uk/

In this episode, I'll be talking all about Paul Ricoeur's approach to texts known as his 'hermeneutics of suspicion'. Enjoy! If you'd like to request an episode, or even do an episode yourself, please contact me on Instagram (@fiveminutephilosophy) or Twitter (@fiveminutephil1).

Season five of our podcast continues with another presentation from our 2020 annual conference: ‘Engaged Phenomenology’ Online. This episode features Pablo Andreu, University of Zaragoza (Spain).   ABSTRACT: George Canguilhem has affirmed that pathology, far from being a state of abnormality, should be considered as another way of life (Canguilhem, 1978, p. 45). According to Canguilhem, being healthy is not the same as being “normal”, what he considers to be an inapplicable concept to biology, but normative, this is, making of a way of life a norm. If accepted, such consideration not only affects what we take to be “pathological”, it also questions what the nature of medical practice is, and what this praxis should be to start. Specifically, if illness is not something that bursts into existence and interrupts it, but rather a new mode of existence properly speaking, then what role, if any, does a patient play in the understanding we have of their illness, and what importance should be attributed to this role during the medical treatment. To this aim, an approach to pathology and medical praxis from a phenomenological point of view seems promising. Martin Heidegger’s notion of care (Sorge) and Paul Ricoeur’s concept of narrative identity could explain the existential shift on a patient’s existence. But tracing illness as a continuity rather than an interruption could be problematic, questioning our very understanding of recovery. In other words, to what extent would a phenomenological approach to medical practice entail a methodological and epistemological differentiation between medically treating a patient and healing a person, and, more importantly, would this demarcation be constructive for the patient’s wellbeing to begin with? The task, hence, is double: on the one hand, to state the benefits phenomenology can bring to medicine; on the other, its plausibility. The following article aims to do so by following the personal account of a cancer fighter, evaluating it through the lens of Heidegger’s notion of care and Ricoeur’s concept of narrative identity.   BIO: Pablo Andreu is a PhD Student at the University of Zaragoza, Spain. Mainly focused on phenomenology, and specifically the phenomenology of death, Pablo Andreu has also approached analytic philosophy through the Master’s program offered by the University of Barcelona.   This recording is taken from the BSP Annual Conference 2020 Online: 'Engaged Phenomenology'. Organised with the University of Exeter and sponsored by Egenis and the Wellcome Centre for Cultures and Environments of Health. BSP2020AC was held online this year due to global concerns about the Coronavirus pandemic. For the conference our speakers recorded videos, our keynotes presented live over Zoom, and we also recorded some interviews online as well. Podcast episodes from BSP2020AC are soundtracks of those videos where we and the presenters feel the audio works as a standalone: https://www.britishphenomenology.org.uk/bsp-annual-conference-2020/   You can check out our forthcoming events here: https://www.britishphenomenology.org.uk/events/ The British Society for Phenomenology is a not-for-profit organisation set up with the intention of promoting research and awareness in the field of Phenomenology and other cognate arms of philosophical thought. Currently, the society accomplishes these aims through its journal, events, and podcast. Why not find out more, join the society, and subscribe to our journal the JBSP? https://www.britishphenomenology.org.uk/

Notre réflexion s'appuiera sur la lecture du dernier ouvrage de Paul Ricoeur, La Mémoire, l'histoire, l'oubli (Editions du Seuil, 2000).Si la mémoire est, comme on la représente souvent, un magasin localisé dans le cerveau où sont inscrites les traces des impressions laissées en nous par les événements passés, comment ces traces peuvent-elles les représenter alors qu'ils ne sont plus ? Présenter des traces cérébrales comme des traces « mnésiques », ce n'est pas résoudre cette énigme, c'est la supposer déjà résolue. Une réflexion philosophique sur la mémoire doit au contraire s'y confronter.1- La double énigme de la mémoirea/ L'énigme de la représentation présente d'une chose absenteLa métaphore de l'empreinte d'un sceau dans un bloc de cire, utilisée par Platon dans le Théétète, présuppose que le souvenir est comme l'image d'une chose qui a été gravée dans l'âme et laisse ainsi son empreinteb/ L'énigme du rapport de l'image du souvenir à une expérience antérieure « Chaque fois que l'on fait acte de mémoire parce qu'on a déjà vu, entendu ou appris telle chose, on perçoit que cela s'est produit antérieurement », Aristote dans De la mémoire et de la réminiscence, « Le souvenir est quelque chose qui tranche sur le présent, c'est ainsi que nous le reconnaissons comme souvenir », Bergson dans Matière et mémoire.c/ L'examen de cette double énigme permet de distinguer deux types de défaillance de la mémoire : 1-elle prétend connaître le passé, or sa représentation peut être infidèle ; 2- elle prétend le retrouver, or l'impression qui en a été laissée peut s'effacer, et l'effort de remémoration peut échouer à l'atteindre2- L'oubli est-il l'ennemi de la mémoire ? a/ La mémoire comme lutte contre l'oubli, voir la préface d'Hérodote à ses Enquêtesb/ Une mémoire parfaite serait un mémoire morte (voir la fiction de Borgès, Funès ou la mémoire) ; l'oubli est la condition de sa vitalité (on ne devrait pas parler d'une « mémoire » de l'ordinateur)c/ Ses défaillances ne peuvent entamer notre confiance : elle est notre seul mode d'accès au passé (l'histoire ne peut s'en passer : elle présuppose le témoignage)d/ Le « petit miracle de la reconnaissance » (Ricoeur) permet de donner une solution pratique à l'énigme que constitue la représentation présente d'une chose antérieure et absente : elle permet de présupposer rétrospectivement que l'image du passé (le souvenir) n'a pas disparu mais a survécu pour pouvoir être maintenant reconnuee/ Cette analyse permet d'opposer deux figures de l'oubli : soit un oubli destructeur qui s'explique par l'effacement des traces, soit un oubli qui n'est qu'un empêchement provisoire et laisse espérer un recouvrement du passé3- La survivance du souvenir : examen de la notion de « trace »a/ Trace psychique (=le souvenir comme impression vécue) et trace cérébrale (voir les neurosciences)b/ Le caractère problématique de la notion de « trace mnésique » : une trace matérielle peut-elle signifier un passé ?c- La trace psychique (le souvenir) a par elle même le pouvoir de survivre (voir Matière et mémoire de Bergson) : la mémoire est ainsi le passé qui se conserve tout entier en moi ; elle n'est pas une faculté de conservation qu'il faudrait localiser dans le cerveau. d- Dans cette perspective, l'oubli désigne le caractère inaperçu (inconscient) de la persévérance du souvenir, il met le passé en réserve (c'est un « oubli de réserve » , Ricoeur). Il faut distinguer deux formes de pathologie : la mémoire détruite (la maladie d'Alzheimer), et la mémoire blessée (l'exemple de l'hystérie, voir la 1ère leçon sur la psychanalyse de Freud)Lectures conseillées :La mémoire, l'histoire, l'oubli de Paul Ricoeur, Editions du Seuil 2000Psychopathologie de la vie quotidienne et 1ère leçon sur la psychanalyse de FreudMatière et mémoire de Bergson, chapitres 2 et 3 Funès ou la mémoire de Borgès

So you want to read the Bible, but you’re not sure how to do it well. What does it really mean? How is the Bible understood?” As Bill Kynes addresses these questions in this article, he emphasizes that “[t]o read the Bible rightly, one must submit to the Master, who alone holds the key to meaning. Jesus Christ and His gospel must guide our understanding of the Bible, even as our reading of the Bible will refine our understanding of Jesus and His work. To read the full article go to https://www.cslewisinstitute.org/How_to_Read_the_Bible_Part2 Recommended Reading; Robert L. Plummer, 40 Questions About Interpreting the Bible (Kregel Academic & Professional, 2010) In 40 Questions about Interpreting the Bible, New Testament Professor Dr. Robert L. Plummer tackles the major questions that persons ask about reading and understanding the Bible. https://www.christianbook.com/questions-about-interpreting-bible-2nd-edition/robert-plummer/9780825446665/pd/44666X?event=ESRCG Kevin J. Vanhoozer, Is There a Meaning in This Text?: The Bible, the Reader, and the Morality of Literary Knowledge The introduction of this burgeoning classic into paperback and the Landmarks in Christian Scholarship collection is much welcomed. Kevin Vanhoozer's Is There Meaning in this Text is the seminal contribution of Evangelical scholarship to the field of Hermeneutics. Vanhoozer lucidly and directly critiques trends in postmodern literary criticism (deconstruction) and thinkers (Ricoeur, Fish), while providing Evangelicals with a critical methodology upon which "texts"--and most especially biblical texts--can be confidently interpreted. https://www.christianbook.com/meaning-bible-reader-morality-literary-knowledge/kevin-vanhoozer/9780310324690/pd/324690?event=ESRCG

durée : 00:19:58 - Les Nuits de France Culture - par : Philippe Garbit, Albane Penaranda, Mathilde Wagman - Le philosophe Paul Ricoeur exposait dans une émission radiodiffusée le 18/12/1957 comment la pensée d'Edmund Husserl, philosophe allemand, avait marqué une rupture dans l'histoire de la philosophie. L'émission s’appelait "Connaissance de l'homme : La phénoménologie" par Paul Ricoeur. - réalisation : Virginie Mourthé - invités : Paul Ricœur Philosophe (1913-2005)

Denne episoden handler om begrepet mimesis. Dette er en serie knyttet til studiet Muntlig fortellerkunst ved OsloMet – storbyuniversitet. Episodene følger studiets progresjon. Du er velkommen til å lytte selv om du ikke er student ved det studiet. Episodene følger emner i undervisningen. Hver episode vil inneholde tradisjonell eller personlig fortelling, i tillegg til teori. Er du interessert i å kunne mer, kan du sjekke ut boken min her: http://www.fortellerkunstner.no/fortellerboken-deg-selv-og-andre-fortalt/ Referanser i episoden: Andersson, D. T. (2017). Erfaring og mimesis Et redningsmotiv i Walter Benjamins filosofi. AGORA NR. 2–3. Gu, M. D. (2005). Is Mimetic Theory in Literature and Art Universal? Poetics Today 26:3. Halliwell, S. (2013, 9 12). Diegesis – Mimesis. Hentet fra the living handbook of narratology : https://www.lhn.uni-hamburg.de/node/36.html Nyrnes, A. (2002). Det didaktiske rommet Didaktisk topologi i Ludvig Holbergs Moralske Tanker. Bergen: Universitetet i Bergen. Verhesschen, P. (2003). The poem's invitation: Ricoeur's concept of Mimesis and its Consequences for Narrative Educational Research. The Journal of Philosophy of Educational Society of Great Britain .

In this episode Chris and Courtney talk with Marc Trabsky, author of "Law and the Dead: Technology, Relations and Institutions". They discuss the changing role of the coroner across history, relationship between record-keeping and law, and Trabsky's undisciplined approach to legal scholarship. Music & ArtAudio clip - WPBF 25 News + Coroner's Report: Black PlagueImage - "Poets' Wit and Humour. Selected by W. H. W. Illustrated, etc"

durée : 00:59:05 - Avoir raison avec... - par : Géraldine Mosna-Savoye - Paul Ricoeur (1913-2005), qui se décrivait comme un "obsédé textuel", est un philosophe majeur du 20ème siècle, pourtant moins connu que Foucault ou Deleuze. Son œuvre monumentale embrasse tout le siècle et échappe à tous les courants de son temps. Comment faire bon usage de sa pensée aujourd'hui ? - réalisation : Thomas Beau - invités : François Dosse historien, spécialiste de l’histoire intellectuelle, professeur à l’Université Paris-Est Créteil et Sciences Po, chercheur à l’IHTP (Institut d’histoire du temps présent); Pierre-Olivier Monteil chercheur associé au Fonds Ricoeur, enseignant en éthique à l’Université Paris Dauphine

Elian Cuvillier relit ces deux philosophes dans leur approche du mal. Contre toute forme de théodicée, la souffrance n'a pas d'autre but qu'elle même. Il faut peut-être donner une place au mal, le nommer pour qu'il ne prenne pas tout l'espace. Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

Felsefe ve Bellek “Paul Ricoeur'de Bellek ve Kendilik” Ricoeur'ün Başkası Olarak Kendisi kitabında ele aldığı kimlik meselesinin temel sorusu, öznenin değişime rağmen, hatta değişim sayesinde, kendisi olabilmesidir. Bu değişen kimlik algısında bellek merkezi bir konumdadır. Kendilik, bir taraftan, aynılıktan, bir belleğe sadakatten ileri gelir, diğer taraftan sürekli değişimdir. Ricoeur bu ikilemi Parcours de la reconnaissance kitabında, bellek (mémoire) ile verilen söz (promesse) arasındaki ayrımda ele alır. Canlı bir kimlik hem bellekle geçmişe hem de verilen söz sayesinde geleceğe yönelir ve kendini yeniler. Ancak bu yine verilen sözü sürekli hatırlamayı gerektirir ve belleği gerekli kılar. Genel olarak konuşmamızın amacı, Ricoeur'de sürekli ama farklı biçimlerde karşımıza çıkan ve her iki boyutu da gerekli olan, arkhe ve telos, sadakat ve ihanet gerilimini kişisel bellek bağlamında ele almaktır.

durée : 00:58:47 - Une vie, une oeuvre - par : Matthieu Garrigou-Lagrange - Philosophe de l'engagement, du sujet "capable", d'une éthique pragmatique face aux obstacles de l'existence, Paul Ricoeur a tissé ensemble des traditions philosophiques multiples pour proposer une approche renouvelée de l'agir humain. - invités : François Dosse historien, spécialiste de l’histoire intellectuelle, professeur à l’Université Paris-Est Créteil et Sciences Po, chercheur à l’IHTP (Institut d’histoire du temps présent); Olivier Mongin essayiste , directeur de la publication de la revue Esprit; Olivier Abel philosophe, professeur de philosophie éthique à l’Institut Protestant de Théologie, Faculté de Montpellier, créateur du Fonds Ricoeur; Michaël Foessel philosophe, spécialiste de la philosophie allemande et de la philosophie contemporaine, et professeur à l'école Polytechnique

In our continuing apocalypse series, Anne Carpenter (St. Mary's College of California) joins Jon to discuss Hans Urs von Balthasar's Theo-Drama IV: The Action and especially the opening sections on the book of Revelation. But first we talk a bit about the new challenge of teaching online in the age of COVID-19. Then Anne gives us an outline of Balthasar's life and the "trilogy" in which his central project consists. Then she explains where Theo-Drama in general and Vol. 4 specifically fit into the scheme of that project. From there, we talk about how the victory of God in Christ initiates the existential conflict at the heart of theo-dramatics. We draw on Blondel and Ricoeur to help try to unpack the character of this conflict and struggle and how it relates the fate of humanism in the 20th century. We have a Patreon! Check out the page at www.patreon.com/systematically Our theme music is “14 Ghosts II” by Nine Inch Nails, available at archive.org/details/nineinchnails_ghosts_I_IV “14 Ghosts II” is used under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share Alike license. We would like to thank Trent Reznor and Nine Inch Nails for the use of this track. Follow and chat with us on Twitter @SystematicPod Email us at SystematicallyPodcast@gmail.com Subscribe and Review us on Apple Podcasts: Systematically Podcast Lastly, if you enjoy our conversations, please share them with your friends!

En este episodio nos adentramos en la modernidad y sus principales críticos: Nietzsche, Marx y Freud, quienes fueron bautizados como los Maestros de la Sospecha por el filósofo francés Paul Ricoeur.Contactofasmacine@gmail.comMúsicaLito Nebbia - La BalsaRockdrigo González - No tengo tiempo

Neste episódio 3/3, o prof. Dr. Rui Josgrilberg expõe, de maneira acessível e prática, os conceitos básicos do Vol. 3 de "Tempo e Narrativa" de Ricoeur. O prof. Dr. Rui Josgrilberg estudou com Ricoeur em Estrasburgo, no começo da década de 70, onde doutorou-se em Sciences Religieuses.

Neste episódio 2/3, o prof. Dr. Rui Josgrilberg expõe, de maneira acessível e prática, os conceitos básicos do Vol. 2 de "Tempo e Narrativa" de Ricoeur. O prof. Dr. Rui Josgrilberg estudou com Ricoeur em Estrasburgo, no começo da década de 70, onde doutorou-se em Sciences Religieuses.

Sé come altro di Paul Ricoeur è presentato nella sua teoria della soggettività, con attenzione ai contesti culturali attraverso i quali tale teoria viene introdotta. Francesca Brezzi Sé come altro di Ricoeur festivalfilosofia 2019 | persona Venerdì 13 settembre 2019 Carpi

Neste episódio 1/3, o prof. Dr. Rui Josgrilberg expõe, de maneira acessível e prática, os conceitos básicos do Vol. 1 de "Tempo e Narrativa" de Ricoeur. O prof. Dr. Rui Josgrilberg estudou com Ricoeur em Estrasburgo, no começo da década de 70, onde doutorou-se em Sciences Religieuses.

durée : 00:59:05 - Avoir raison avec... - par : Géraldine Mosna-Savoye - Paul Ricoeur (1913-2005), qui se décrivait comme un "obsédé textuel", est un philosophe majeur du 20ème siècle, pourtant moins connu que Foucault ou Deleuze. Son œuvre monumentale embrasse tout le siècle et échappe à tous les courants de son temps. Comment faire bon usage de sa pensée aujourd'hui ? - réalisation : Thomas Beau - invités : François Dosse historien, spécialiste de l’histoire intellectuelle, professeur à l’Université Paris-Est Créteil et Sciences Po, chercheur à l’IHTP (Institut d’histoire du temps présent); Pierre-Olivier Monteil chercheur associé au Fonds Ricoeur, enseignant en éthique à l’Université Paris Dauphine

Today’s episode is a lovely chat with our very interesting and talented friends Erin Kidd, Assistant Professor of Theology and Religious Studies at St. John’s University (Queens, NY), and Jakob Karl Rinderknecht, Assistant Professor of Religious Studies and Director of the Pastoral Institute at University of the Incarnate Word (San Antonio, TX). After a lively discussion of Erin’s most recent culinary catastrophes and the wild/wonderful Riverwest neighborhood of Milwaukee, we learn about Erin and Jakob’s new edited volume: Putting God on the Map: Theology and Conceptual Mapping (Fortress Press, 2018). The volume is an interdisciplinary work in theology and cognitive science, and our conversation covers the basics of cognitive linguistics and conceptual mapping. We also introduce the wide-ranging implications of their intersections and applications in theological discourse. Jon shares his Treasures Old & New, and then we say goodbye. Erin and Jakob are very generously offering our listeners a 30% discount on Putting God on the Map! Enter promotional code LEX30AUTH18 when you checkout at https://rowman.com/ISBN/9781978703964/Putting-God-on-the-Map-Theology-and-Conceptual-Mapping TITLES NAMED IN MAIN SEGMENT Johnson, Elizabeth. She Who Is: The Mystery of God in Feminist Theological Discourse. 10th Anniversary Edition. New York: Crossroad, 2002. Jong, Jonathan, Christopher Kavanagh, and Aku Visala. “Born Idolaters: The Limits of the Philosophical Implications of the Cognitive Science of Religion.” Neue Zeitschrift für Systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie 57, no. 2 (2015): 244–66. Kidd, Erin. “The Subject of Conceptual Mapping: Theological Anthropology across Brain, Body, and World.” Open Theology 4, no. 1 (2018): 117–35. Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980. Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books, 1999. Masson, Robert. Without Metaphor, No Saving God: Theology after Cognitive Linguistics. Leuven: Peeters Publishers, 2014. Ricoeur, Paul. Interpretation Theory: Discourse and the Surplus of Meaning. Fort Worth: Texas Christian University Press, 1976. Ricoeur, Paul. The Rule of Metaphor: Multi-Disciplinary Studies in the Creation of Meaning in Language. Translated by Robert Czerny with Kathleen McLaughlin and John Costello. London: Routledge, 1978. Rinderknecht, Jakob Karl. Mapping the Differentiated Consensus of the Joint Declaration. New York: Palgrave, 2016. “TREASURES OLD AND NEW” Schleiermacher, Friedrich. Christian Faith (Two-Volume Set): A New Translation and Critical Edition. Translated by Terrence N. Tice, Catherine L. Kelsey, and Edwina Lawler. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 2016. Our theme music is “14 Ghosts II” by Nine Inch Nails, available at https://archive.org/details/nineinchnails_ghosts_I_IV “14 Ghosts II” is used under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share Alike license. We would like to thank Trent Reznor and Nine Inch Nails for the use of this track. Follow us on Twitter @SystematicPod Email us at SystematicallyPodcast@gmail.com Subscribe and Review us on iTunes: Systematically Podcast Exciting reminder: We are now on iTunes! Please search for Systematically Podcast, hit the “Subscribe” button, and—if you’re feeling so inclined—leave us a review. As Jon points out, five is a good number of stars! Lastly, if you enjoy our conversations, please share them with your friends!

In literature, evil can appear in a broad spectrum of shapes, images and motifs. For Endō Shūsaku, the problem of evil is central to the reality of human existence, and it has to be accepted as such. In Hermeneutics of Evil in the Works of Endō Shūsaku. Between Reading and Writing (Peter Lang, 2016), Justyna Weronika Kasza starts from the assumption that the notion of evil informs many of Shūsaku’s most renowned novels; on the other hand, she argues that Shūsaku’s body of work should be treated and analyzed as a whole, as his essays and critical texts are in fact complementary to his works of fiction. Kasza’s book is, on the one hand, an attempt to trace Shūsaku’s line of thinking and, on the other hand, to apply certain categories of Ricoeur’s hermeneutics to literary studies in order to better understand his body of work. Kasza concludes that evil as a problem was, for Shūsaku, closely intertwined with the Christian faith and with Western culture, which represented for him an “otherness” that manifested itself in multiple forms. The book also includes the first English translation of five of Endō Shūsaku’s critical texts. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In literature, evil can appear in a broad spectrum of shapes, images and motifs. For Endō Shūsaku, the problem of evil is central to the reality of human existence, and it has to be accepted as such. In Hermeneutics of Evil in the Works of Endō Shūsaku. Between Reading and Writing (Peter Lang, 2016), Justyna Weronika Kasza starts from the assumption that the notion of evil informs many of Shūsaku’s most renowned novels; on the other hand, she argues that Shūsaku’s body of work should be treated and analyzed as a whole, as his essays and critical texts are in fact complementary to his works of fiction. Kasza’s book is, on the one hand, an attempt to trace Shūsaku’s line of thinking and, on the other hand, to apply certain categories of Ricoeur’s hermeneutics to literary studies in order to better understand his body of work. Kasza concludes that evil as a problem was, for Shūsaku, closely intertwined with the Christian faith and with Western culture, which represented for him an “otherness” that manifested itself in multiple forms. The book also includes the first English translation of five of Endō Shūsaku’s critical texts. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In the first, "preview" episode of Systematically, we do some introductions and then settle into a discussion of the conceptual and moral questions around forgiveness. Then we recommend way too many books. Show notes below: TITLES NAMED IN MAIN SEGMENT Derrida, Jacques. “To Forgive: The Unforgivable and the Imprescriptible.” In Questioning God, edited by John Caputo, Mark Dooley, and Michael Scanlon. 21-51. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 2001. Derrida, Jacques. “On Forgiveness,” in On Cosmopolitanism and Forgiveness. New York: Routledge, 2001. Heaps, Jonathan. “Tweeting the Impossible Forgiveness: Some Resources from Continental Philosophy for Thinking about Charleston, Mercy, and Social Media.” The Other Journal 25 (2015): 77-83. http://theotherjournal.com/2015/11/09/tweeting-the-impossible- forgiveness-some-resources-from-continental-philosophy-for-thinking-about-charleston- mercy-and-social-media/. Lonergan, Bernard J.F. Insight: A Study of Human Understanding. Edited by Frederick E. Crowe and Robert M. Doran. 5th Edition. Collected Works of Bernard Lonergan, Volume 3. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1992. Lonergan, Bernard J.F. Method in Theology. Edited by Robert M. Doran and John D. Dadosky. Collected Works of Bernard Lonergan, Volume 14. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2017. Ricoeur, Paul. Memory, History, Forgetting. Translated by Kathleen Blamey and David Pellauer. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2009. Volf, Miroslav. Free of Charge: Giving and Forgiving in a Culture Stripped of Grace. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2006. Walsh, J. P. M. The Mighty from Their Thrones: Power in Biblical Tradition. Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock, 2004. “TREASURES OLD AND NEW” Blondel, Maurice. Action: Essay on a Critique of Life and a Science of Practice. Translated by Oliva Blanchette. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame, 1984. Boersma, Hans. Seeing God: The Beatific Vision in Christian Tradition. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2018. Byrne, Patrick H. The Ethics of Discernment: Lonergan’s Foundations for Ethics. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2017. Kirk, Kenneth E. Vision of God. New edition. Ingram Publisher Services, 2001. Peguy, Charles. The Portal of the Mystery of Hope. Translated by David Louis Schindler Jr. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2005. Our theme music is “14 Ghosts II” by Nine Inch Nails, available at https://archive.org/details/nineinchnails_ghosts_I_IV “14 Ghosts II” is used under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share Alike license. We would like to thank Trent Reznor and Nine Inch Nails for the use of this track. Follow us on Twitter @SystematicPod

  In this episode we talk with Wallace scholar Clare Hayes-Brady about her new book The Unspeakable Failures of David Foster Wallace. http://www.bloomsbury.com/us/the-unspeakable-failures-of-david-foster-wallace-9781501313530/ She is Lecturer in American Literature at University College, Dublin. We discuss a variety of issues in this episode including bad endings, DFW Studies, Ricoeur, love, Their Eyes Were Watching God, and assorted other things. You can find her on Twitter https://twitter.com/ClareHayesBrady    Show notes 00:30 - Byzantine Erotica right off the bat 01:30 - Spelling of Quebecois 02:30 - UCD vs TCD 04:01 - The Unspeakable Failures 05:01 - Noncompletion, the lack of closure 05:45 - A Failed Entertainment 08:30 - Short Story Theory, resistance to closure 10:39 - We don't have neat narratives 13:00 - How can you be done with something? 14:26 - Starting IJ again 15:20 - The peripheral stuff 16:27 - Was IJ/DFW narcissistic? 19:10 - The empathetic connection with readers 20:38 - Incoherent need to communicate 22:21 - The problem with romantic relationships--and Anne Geddes 25:21 - Misogyny from a place of fear 26:36 - The Granola Cruncher 30:53 - The silencing of female characters 31:02 - The Lionel Shriver issue 35:18 - A poorly disguised avatar 35:45 - Hungerford piece 37:02 - The Joycean Boys Club 39:59 - The C-word 44:42 - Inhabiting other minds 45:29 - Hurston not explaining things 47:26 - White male protagonists. . . groan 48:46 - VIDA count and the equivalent awareness 50:01 - Separating the artist from the art 51:29 - Ferrante & Knausgaard 55:36 - Writing beyond his own perspective 56:20 - Hardcore Theory Weenies 58:41 - Conflating a couple of paradoxes 59:59 - A fascinating disaster of a book 1:01:54 - The conclusions of the failures 1:04:40 - First attempt in Learning 1:05:08 - Post on Poor Yorick's Summer 1:05:30 - Honest Ulsterman and motherhood 1:08:40 - Easter Egg

We're getting hermeneutical with Dan Stiver and Paul Ricoeur. Dan Stiver is an accomplished Ricoeur scholar and a Baptist theologian. This rare combination means that we have a treat of an episode! He is also the Cook-Derrick Professor of Theology in the Logsdon School of Theology. In this episode Tripp and Dan will tackle the relationship between philosophy and theology in the free church tradition and what it means to be a Christian theologian after Ricoeur. Plus a discussion on how Ricouer understands: the nature of truth how narrative functions in meaning making the idea of self the problem of evil There are quite a lot of books mentioned in this episode, so here is a list for your enjoyment: Theology After Ricoeur by Dan Stiver The Conflict of Interpretations by Paul Ricoeur Thinking Biblically by Paul Ricoeur Essays of Biblical Interpretation by Paul Ricoeur Lectures on Ideology and Utopia by Paul Ricoeur Freedom and Nature by Paul Ricoeur Phenomenology of Perception by Maurice Merleau-Ponty Carnal Hermeneutics by Richard Kearney Theology in the Flesh by John Sanders Follow the podcast, drop a review, send feedback/questions or become a member of the HBC Community. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

À propos du Livre Histoire des protestants en France Les protestants français, les huguenots, formaient 10 % de la population en 1560, 2 % à partir du XVIIIe siècle. Aujourd’hui, ils représentent un peu plus avec les évangéliques. Leur histoire a été celle d’un échec, puisque la patrie de Calvin n’est pas devenue protestante. Mais elle a dû apprendre à vivre avec une minorité tenace, riche d’élites, enracinée dans des villes phares – La Rochelle, Montauban, Nîmes – et des sanctuaires ruraux – les Cévennes, le Vivarais, le Poitou. Ce long apprentissage du pluralisme religieux a marqué la nation, avec ses avancées (l’édit de Nantes) et ses reculs (la Révocation). Les protestants ont subi une violence multiforme et séculaire, et beaucoup d’entre eux ont choisi de quitter la France : leur diaspora a compté en Europe et en Amérique. Les autres ont fait de ce passé tragique le coeur d’une identité douloureuse et fière. Mais ils ont également connu le bonheur, surtout depuis 1789 et leur réintégration. Renforcés par leurs coreligionnaires de Mulhouse et les luthériens d’Alsace et de Montbéliard, ils ont contribué à fonder l’État et la société modernes, notamment au moment d’établir la laïcité républicaine. Leur influence a été disproportionnée, et reste parfois forte comme dans l’industrie (Peugeot, Hermès ou Seydoux), la politique (Rocard, Jospin) ou la culture (Gide, Ricoeur, Godard). Dans cet ouvrage appelé à faire date, Patrick Cabanel nous raconte l’histoire d’une minorité qui n’a cessé d’interroger la nation et d’infléchir son destin : une autre histoire de la France, en quelque sorte. Patrick Cabanel est professeur d’histoire contemporaine à l’Université de Toulouse-Le Mirail et dirige la revue Diasporas. Histoire et sociétés. Il a publié notamment Histoire des Cévennes (PUF), Les protestants et la République (Complexe), Le Dieu de la République. Aux sources protestantes de la laïcité (1860-1900) (PUR), Juifs et protestants en France, les affinités électives XVIe-XXIe siècle (Fayard). Ouvrage publié avec le concours du Centre National du Livre

On Paul Ricoeur's "The Critique of Religion" and "The Language of Faith" (1973), with guest Law Ware. How can we apply hermeneutics to the Bible?

If you experience any technical difficulties with this video or would like to make an accessibility-related request, please send a message to digicomm@uchicago.edu. To attempt to capture something of his unique intellectual spirit, the sessions aim to think with Ricoeur toward an enhanced understanding of religion via the themes of ethics, philosophy, and culture. Sponsored by the France Chicago Center and the Martin Marty Center at the University of Chicago Divinity School. Participants: Pamela Anderson, Professor of Modern European Philosophy of Religion, University of Oxford; Fellow in Philosophy, Regent's Park College, and Richard A. Rosengarten, University of Chicago. Chair: Sarah Hammerschlag, University of Chicago

If you experience any technical difficulties with this video or would like to make an accessibility-related request, please send a message to digicomm@uchicago.edu. To attempt to capture something of his unique intellectual spirit, the sessions aim to think with Ricoeur toward an enhanced understanding of religion via the themes of ethics, philosophy, and culture. Sponsored by the France Chicago Center and the Martin Marty Center at the University of Chicago Divinity School. Participants: Pamela Anderson, Professor of Modern European Philosophy of Religion, University of Oxford; Fellow in Philosophy, Regent's Park College, and Richard A. Rosengarten, University of Chicago Chair: Sarah Hammerschlag, University of Chicago

If you experience any technical difficulties with this video or would like to make an accessibility-related request, please send a message to digicomm@uchicago.edu. To attempt to capture something of his unique intellectual spirit, the sessions aim to think with Ricoeur toward an enhanced understanding of religion via the themes of ethics, philosophy, and culture. Sponsored by the France Chicago Center and the Martin Marty Center at the University of Chicago Divinity School. Participants: Pamela Anderson, Professor of Modern European Philosophy of Religion, University of Oxford; Fellow in Philosophy, Regent's Park College, and Richard A. Rosengarten, University of Chicago. Chair: Sarah Hammerschlag, University of Chicago

If you experience any technical difficulties with this video or would like to make an accessibility-related request, please send a message to digicomm@uchicago.edu. To attempt to capture something of his unique intellectual spirit, the sessions aim to think with Ricoeur toward an enhanced understanding of religion via the themes of ethics, philosophy, and culture. Sponsored by the France Chicago Center and the Martin Marty Center at the University of Chicago Divinity School. Participants: Pamela Anderson, Professor of Modern European Philosophy of Religion, University of Oxford; Fellow in Philosophy, Regent's Park College, and Richard A. Rosengarten, University of Chicago Chair: Sarah Hammerschlag, University of Chicago

If you experience any technical difficulties with this video or would like to make an accessibility-related request, please send a message to digicomm@uchicago.edu. This is the first in a series of occasional sessions at the University of Chicago Divinity School to commemorate the centenary of Paul Ricoeur’s birth. To attempt to capture something of his unique intellectual spirit, the sessions aim to think with Ricoeur toward an enhanced understanding of religion via the themes of ethics, philosophy, and culture.

If you experience any technical difficulties with this video or would like to make an accessibility-related request, please send a message to digicomm@uchicago.edu. This is the first in a series of occasional sessions at the University of Chicago Divinity School to commemorate the centenary of Paul Ricoeur’s birth. To attempt to capture something of his unique intellectual spirit, the sessions aim to think with Ricoeur toward an enhanced understanding of religion via the themes of ethics, philosophy, and culture.

“Isn’t it funny?” once mused Buck O’Neil, the sage of Negro League baseball. “Everybody remembers going to their first baseball game with their father. They might not remember going to their first day of school, . . . or their first Thanksgiving dinner. But they always remember going to the baseball game with their father.” O’Neil’s observation applies to me (the game was between the Twins and Angels, at Met Stadium in 1977), as it does to Lee Congdon (a game at Wrigley Field in 1948). The starting point of Lee’s book is this understanding of the important place that baseball holds in the memories of its fans. Baseball and Memory: Winning, Losing, and the Remembrance of Things Past (St. Augustine’s Press, 2011) is filled with recollections of wins and losses, of moments comic and tragic, from all eras of baseball history. As Lee explains, these remembered visits to the ballpark or great plays seen on television point to larger questions of the ways that memory shapes us and the ways that we understand larger periods of history. As a scholar of European intellectual history, Congdon takes a somewhat different approach to baseball, and names like Ricoeur, Kundera, and even Nietzsche figure into our conversation. Certainly, this is a baseball book, and Lee revisits many of the well-known and lesser-known moments and characters of baseball history. But it also a more philosophical, personal reflection on how Americans view the nation’s pastime and the nation’s past. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

“Isn’t it funny?” once mused Buck O’Neil, the sage of Negro League baseball. “Everybody remembers going to their first baseball game with their father. They might not remember going to their first day of school, . . . or their first Thanksgiving dinner. But they always remember going to the baseball game with their father.” O’Neil’s observation applies to me (the game was between the Twins and Angels, at Met Stadium in 1977), as it does to Lee Congdon (a game at Wrigley Field in 1948). The starting point of Lee’s book is this understanding of the important place that baseball holds in the memories of its fans. Baseball and Memory: Winning, Losing, and the Remembrance of Things Past (St. Augustine’s Press, 2011) is filled with recollections of wins and losses, of moments comic and tragic, from all eras of baseball history. As Lee explains, these remembered visits to the ballpark or great plays seen on television point to larger questions of the ways that memory shapes us and the ways that we understand larger periods of history. As a scholar of European intellectual history, Congdon takes a somewhat different approach to baseball, and names like Ricoeur, Kundera, and even Nietzsche figure into our conversation. Certainly, this is a baseball book, and Lee revisits many of the well-known and lesser-known moments and characters of baseball history. But it also a more philosophical, personal reflection on how Americans view the nation’s pastime and the nation’s past. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The first e* post of the new academic year is a first in another sense. Previously, all my postings here have been research lectures, about my own work. This post is of a lecture I gave on October 17th, 2006 as part of a Theoretical Philosophy course on the pioneering Consciousness Studies Program at the University of Skövde, Sweden. That is, it is a teaching lecture (that I have been giving for a few years), aimed at third-year undergraduate students on a course primarily on Modern European (read "Continental") Philosophy. As such, it is not primarily my own work. However, given my rather skewed and limited knowledge of this area, proper scholars of this kind of philosophy will probably see more of me in this lecture than they see of the work of Derrida, Foucault, Gadamer, Habermas, Ricoeur, etc.The lecture is almost entirely based on the Introduction chapter of After Philosophy: End or Transformation?, edited by Kenneth Baynes, James Bohman, and Thomas McCarthy, and so they deserve credit for most of the ideas presented. My contributions consist primarily in giving examples, and an extended, perhaps laboured, Bernstein-influenced musicological metaphor, that can be summarized in the slogan: "Kant is the Mahler of Philosophy".This lecture makes poor use of the PodSlide format, going through only 6 slides in 40 minutes. It is actually only the first part of the lecture; part two, which is shorter, will be posted soon.Media:PodSlides: iPod-ready video (.mp4; 67.1 MB; 40 min 17 sec)Audio (.mp3; 9.3 MB; 40 min 12 sec)PowerPoint file (.ppt; 72 KB)