Podcasts about scrum masters

Alf Dobbert-Baums: The Two-Country Scrum Team and the Rapport That Never Showed Up Read the full Show Notes and search through the world's largest audio library on Agile and Scrum directly on the Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast website: http://bit.ly/SMTP_ShowNotes.   "It did not quite go as planned. I was really humbled." - Alf Dobbert-Baums   Alf was new in the company. His boss walked over with a setup that already sounded like a warning: two development teams in two countries, two locations in Germany, a "difficult" Product Owner — and a quick "do you want to take it?" Alf said sure. Everything happened on video chat. Every meeting, every conversation, every attempt to read the room — through a window that closed the moment the call ended. The rapport never built. The PO stayed difficult. Alf eventually got pulled from the team. Looking back, he saw what the video chat had hidden: the crossed arms, the eyes drifting to email, the small in-between moments that turn coworkers into colleagues. The fix wasn't a tool — it was a flight. Visit the other location. Run a workshop with a real goal ("how do we want to work together?", "what's hard about our setup?"). Build a positive anchor before anything goes wrong, not after. And when you do go, don't lead with the failures — lead with what could be possible together.   In this episode, we refer to the practice of building team working agreements as a way to create rapport without putting people on the defensive.   Self-reflection Question: When was the last time you saw the people you work with face-to-face — and what conversations are you still postponing because they only happen well in person?   [The Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast Recommends]

Mirco Gerling: The Hydra Product Owner and the PO Who Made Trust Possible Read the full Show Notes and search through the world's largest audio library on Agile and Scrum directly on the Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast website: http://bit.ly/SMTP_ShowNotes. The Great Product Owner: Precision That Builds Team Trust Read the full Show Notes and search through the world's largest audio library on Agile and Scrum directly on the Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast website: http://bit.ly/SMTP_ShowNotes.   "He always had an answer, or if he didn't have the answer, he tried to ask the clients, the users, the stakeholders." - Mirco Gerling   In pharmaceutical software, the wrong dose can kill someone. So when Mirco worked with a PO in that domain, precision wasn't a virtue — it was a survival requirement. The PO wrote meticulous user stories in classic "As a user, I want… so that…" format with very good acceptance criteria. The developers always knew what done meant. And when, mid-sprint, the team spotted a gap — "Is 80% tolerance of 100% or 80% of all?" — the PO was there, asking the right people, refining or splitting the story, never letting ambiguity ship. Even when half the team was out sick in winter, the remaining developers could deliver because the user stories were clear enough to stand on their own. Stories linked to automated tests. Each acceptance criterion traceable to the test that proved it. The result: a team that trusted their PO. As Mirco puts it, that trust came from one thing — the PO had already done the work needed to help the team understand what to do and how they'd know it was done.   Self-reflection Question: What's the level of precision in your team's user stories signaling to your developers about how much you trust them — and how much you've prepared for them? The Bad Product Owner: The Hydra PO with Seven Heads Read the full Show Notes and search through the world's largest audio library on Agile and Scrum directly on the Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast website: http://bit.ly/SMTP_ShowNotes.   "If the developers had questions, the people said: 'it's not my ticket, it's not my story.'" - Mirco Gerling   Five Scrum teams. One Product Owner. Seven requirements engineers writing user stories alongside. Eight people doing the work of product ownership — and nobody owning any of it. Developers learned quickly that asking a question meant being bounced from one requirements engineer to another. "It's not my ticket." The eight-person PO group split into two sub-teams who, when they spoke about each other, used "you" and "they" instead of "we." Decisions made in week one collided with decisions made in week three. Mirco's intervention: treat the PO group like a Scrum team. Eight people is a team-sized group. Run retrospectives with them. Get them communicating as a unit instead of as parallel individuals. The one anchor that kept things from completely falling apart was the single PO at the top, who could still say "this feature we need at the end of the year, the other can wait." Without unified prioritization, the hydra has no direction — just seven heads pulling in seven ways.   Self-reflection Question: Where in your product organization are decision-makers proliferating without a shared mandate — and what's the cost in clarity for the teams downstream?   [The Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast Recommends]

Mirco Gerling: The Silence Test — How to Know Your Team Doesn't Need You Anymore Read the full Show Notes and search through the world's largest audio library on Agile and Scrum directly on the Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast website: http://bit.ly/SMTP_ShowNotes.   "Don't talk too much. And only talk if it's necessary." - Mirco Gerling   For Mirco, success as a Scrum Master starts with a simple rule he had to fight for: don't try to be someone else. Early in his career, when people kept saying "Mirco, you decide, you're the Scrum Master," he had to do the hard work of pushing back — "no, we decide together." That instinct shapes his whole definition of success. Be authentic. Wait before you speak. Ask before you instruct. And when a discussion stalls, sit with the silence — because in most cases, someone in the team has a better idea than you do. The cleanest test of whether a team is truly self-managing? Disappear. When Mirco took two months of parental leave, his team kept running every Scrum event without him. That's the signal. If you stop sending the sprint review invite, stop preparing the retrospective, stop nudging — and the team picks it up because they own it — your work is showing.   Self-reflection Question: What's one thing you currently do for your team that you suspect they would do themselves if you simply stopped doing it? Featured Retrospective Format for the Week: 1-2-4-All from Liberating Structures Mirco's universal tool is Liberating Structures, and within that toolbox, 1-2-4-All is his go-to. The pitch: "involve everybody, especially in large groups. And there's nearly no preparation needed." His proof point — facilitating a retrospective for 60 people at the Agile by Nature bar camp in just 20 minutes. The format scales from a team of five to a room of sixty without changing its shape: one minute alone, two minutes in pairs, four minutes in small groups, then a share-back with the whole group. During a 30°C COVID summer in Hamburg, Mirco even ran retros walking outdoors with his team — station to station, down to the lake for ice cream, then back. "It was a very good and constructive retrospective." The lesson: the right structure makes you portable.   [The Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast Recommends]

Mirco Gerling: Two Teams, One Sprint Cadence — The Hidden Cost of Synchronization Read the full Show Notes and search through the world's largest audio library on Agile and Scrum directly on the Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast website: http://bit.ly/SMTP_ShowNotes.   "The teams need to understand the advantage of the synchronization — but will they?" - Mirco Gerling   Two of Mirco's teams just got merged into one — and the brand-new, fused team is now part of a 10+ team organization trying to move from loose-coupled chaos to a standard process. Different sprint lengths. Different estimation methods. Different ticketing tools. The plan: align everyone to 4-week sprints, hold a global planning week every three months, and synchronize start and end dates across all teams. Mirco voted for 2-week sprints. The majority went with 4. And then the side effects started. Sprint reviews stack up on the same days, making it impossible for Scrum Masters to facilitate them all. Teams synchronize on paper, but interact organically across the four weeks anyway, so the cadence advantage doesn't materialize. And the merged team itself? Pushed back through Tuckman's stages by the merge — the Tuckman model reminded Mirco that "adjourning" is real, and a high-performing team starts over when its membership changes. Mirco's experiment: let faster-moving teams run two 2-week sprints inside the 4-week window, keeping organizational sync while restoring their own learning rhythm.   Self-reflection Question: Where in your organization is process standardization being mistaken for actual alignment — and what would it cost you to separate the two?   [The Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast Recommends]

Mirco Gerling: The Supermarket Team That Self-Destructed Trying to Help Everyone Read the full Show Notes and search through the world's largest audio library on Agile and Scrum directly on the Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast website: http://bit.ly/SMTP_ShowNotes.   "They tried to help, and finally, it... it self-destructed the team." - Mirco Gerling   The team was the supermarket of the organization. Cloud systems, versioning, developer machines, hardware — if another team needed infrastructure, this team built it. And when other teams asked, the answer was always the same: "We will try, we will try." Mirco watched what happened next play out in slow motion. The team escalated their overload to management. Management responded the way management often responds — sent in temporary help. The reinforcements solved problems quickly and left. But every system they built became permanent maintenance work for the original team. The pile grew. The team shrank. People left for other teams, or left the organization entirely. The escalation that was supposed to save them became the signal that broke them. As Mirco puts it: running to the higher level "sends a signal that self-organization or self-management does not work." Sometimes the help is the harm.   In this segment, we refer to the dynamic of team self-organization and how it can break down under pressure.   Self-reflection Question: When your team is overwhelmed, what does the act of escalating tell management about your ability to self-manage — and is that the signal you want to send? Featured Book of the Week: The Kanban Maturity Model In this episode, Mirco also recommends two books that shaped his thinking on process and estimation. The first is #NoEstimates by Vasco Duarte, which inspired Mirco to drop story-point estimation in some teams and simply count completed tickets per sprint. The second is the Kanban Maturity Model — a book Mirco uses to run workshops where teams discover their current level of process maturity. "The highest level says that you have a standardized process, and the result is always the same for the same type of work," he explains. Most teams start at level zero, but that's the point: knowing where you stand is the precondition for knowing where to go next.   [The Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast Recommends]

Mirco Gerling: When the Scrum Guide Isn't the Rulebook — A Scrum Master's First Conflict with Management Read the full Show Notes and search through the world's largest audio library on Agile and Scrum directly on the Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast website: http://bit.ly/SMTP_ShowNotes.   "I had to learn that the organization didn't know the Scrum Guide very exactly." - Mirco Gerling   In his first Scrum Master role — running hybrid as both developer and Scrum Master — Mirco walked in believing the Scrum Guide was the rulebook everyone played by. The team thought so too: they were self-managing now, so they would decide. Management hadn't read the same memo. When Mirco called time on a meeting, a manager said "It's my decision when the meeting is over." When Mirco asked the team if they were happy in a retrospective, the manager saw the flip chart afterward — and from that day on, Mirco started destroying anything from retrospectives that could attract attention. The conflict wasn't about Scrum. It was about who gets to decide what. Without an explicit conversation about the limits of self-management, the team and management each assumed authority the other thought was theirs. Mirco eventually found Management 3.0's Delegation Poker — a tool that makes those invisible boundaries visible and gives teams and managers a structured way to negotiate them. The lesson: raise the topic with management before the conflict, not after.   In this episode, we refer to the Delegation Poker practice from Management 3.0.   Self-reflection Question: Where in your team's work are the limits of self-management still unspoken — and what would change if you put them on the table this week?   [The Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast Recommends]

Aliu Adewale: The Over-Communicator vs. The Over-Ambitious—Two Patterns Every Scrum Master Should Recognize Read the full Show Notes and search through the world's largest audio library on Agile and Scrum directly on the Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast website: http://bit.ly/SMTP_ShowNotes. The Great Product Owner: The Over-Communicator Who Negotiated Every Scope Change Read the full Show Notes and search through the world's largest audio library on Agile and Scrum directly on the Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast website: http://bit.ly/SMTP_ShowNotes.   "This is a guy who over-communicates everything." - Aliu Adewale   The best Product Owner Aliu ever worked with did something simple that almost no PO does. Before each refinement, he'd pull up the Jira board, record himself walking through every user story, explaining acceptance criteria, talking through the end goal one ticket at a time—and post the video to the team a day or two ahead. This was before Loom existed. The result: refinement felt less like discovery and more like "walking it back"—the team arrived already prepared, with real questions, ready to engage. He still attended every refinement and never missed a comment in Jira. But the second skill Aliu names matters even more: negotiation. This PO never let scope creep into a sprint mid-stride without consulting the team first. "If we add these two requests from leadership, what's the impact? Do we need to take something out?" And if the team said no, he didn't force it. He went back to leadership and named the consequence: "If we add this, here's what happens. Are you okay with that?" Over-communication and negotiation—two skills that protect the team and the product at the same time.   Self-reflection Question: When was the last time your PO asked the team's permission before adding work mid-sprint? The Bad Product Owner: The Over-Ambitious PO Who Never Said No Read the full Show Notes and search through the world's largest audio library on Agile and Scrum directly on the Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast website: http://bit.ly/SMTP_ShowNotes.   "Every yes to something unimportant is a no to what matters." - Aliu Adewale   The Product Owner Aliu names as the anti-pattern is the over-ambitious PO—the one who never says no. Never to stakeholders, never to the business, never to a new feature request. He never considered the size of the team or the capacity of the team. He was blind to it. Underneath the behavior, Aliu sees a pattern: POs who want to keep their job by saying yes, stakeholders who keep asking because they think they have to, and a team on probation that doesn't feel safe pushing back. The damage compounds—more features delivered, less value per feature, and eventually the team itself starts to break. Aliu's framing is sharp: "More features don't equal more value. Sometimes more is just less." The job of the Scrum Master here is to coach the PO on when to say no, when to say yes, and how to recognize that on the phone in front of you right now, 90% of the features in that app you're staring at—you never use them. Built. Shipped. Ignored.   In this segment, we refer to Product Owner anti-patterns and the courage required to challenge stakeholder demands.   Self-reflection Question: Is your PO measuring success by features shipped, or by features used?   [The Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast Recommends]

Aliu Adewale: Success Is Living the Five Scrum Values—And Asking the Team If You Are Read the full Show Notes and search through the world's largest audio library on Agile and Scrum directly on the Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast website: http://bit.ly/SMTP_ShowNotes.   "Trust is the foundation of empowerment. When you trust your team, they will deliver beyond your expectation." - Aliu Adewale   For Aliu, success as a Scrum Master is concrete: the team is living the five Scrum values—commitment, focus, openness, respect, and courage—and the organization is getting real value from their work. Commitment shows up in how the team holds itself to a Sprint goal. Focus shows up in how they protect that goal from noise. Openness reduces conflict because nothing festers in the dark. Respect, Aliu reframes powerfully: respect for someone's background comes before respect for their skill set—because in a team where people come from different countries, religions, and skill sets, that's the foundation everything else sits on. And courage shows up when a team can tell a Product Owner or a stakeholder that no, this can't be done in this Sprint, and we need to talk about it. But the values alone aren't success—the test is whether the team is delivering value frequently to the organization. The way Aliu keeps himself honest is uncomfortable but simple: he sends a survey to his team and asks them to tell him how he's doing on communication, on risk mitigation, on empowering them to reach stakeholders directly. He starts the assessment cycle the moment he joins—asking the organization what success looks like in this role in the next three months—and he refuses to "get carried away" and stop asking.   Self-reflection Question: Have you ever sent your team a survey asking them to rate you—and acted on what they said? Featured Retrospective Format for the Week: Start, Stop, Continue Aliu's go-to retrospective is the classic Start, Stop, Continue. Three questions—What should we start doing? What should we stop doing? What should we continue doing?—and the team has the structure they need to pinpoint their own shortcomings and decide what to do about them. The reason it works so well, Aliu argues, is the psychological safety the simplicity creates. There's no jargon, no clever framework, no facilitator gimmick to hide behind. Experienced and self-organizing teams especially thrive with it because they can name what's not working without you having to call it out for them. As a Scrum Master, when your team starts pointing at their own gaps without your prompt, that's the moment you should applaud yourself—you coached them into the space where they can do it.   [The Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast Recommends]

Aliu Adewale: When Everything Is a "Must-Have," Nothing Is—Prioritization for Real-World Teams Read the full Show Notes and search through the world's largest audio library on Agile and Scrum directly on the Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast website: http://bit.ly/SMTP_ShowNotes.   "Every yes to something unimportant is a no to what matters." - Aliu Adewale   Aliu's current challenge isn't from his day job—it's from a volunteer project for his local Parent-Teacher Association. The group wants to build a centralized app for school announcements, PTA updates, volunteer coordination, event reminders. The first meeting produced 250 ideas, all of them framed as must-haves, all of them needed before school resumes. The window: three months. Vasco names two traps that most Scrum Masters fall into. First, MoSCoW and similar frameworks aren't prioritization—they're categorization. The moment everything ends up in the "must" bucket, you're still stuck. Second, prioritizing a feature list assumes features are independent. They almost never are: a login blocks a dozen things downstream; front-end depends on back-end; dependencies decide the order more than desirability does. Aliu's experiment with the PTA group is a focusing constraint: stop asking "what do we need this year?" and start asking "what do we need in the first three months when school resumes?" The 50-item must-have list collapsed to five or six features. Vasco pushes it further with his own favorite question: "What's preventing us from releasing tomorrow?" That's the question that exposes what really matters—and it almost never returns a list of features.   Self-reflection Question: If your team had to release tomorrow, which of your "must-haves" would you actually need?   [The Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast Recommends]

If Your ScrumMaster Only Runs Meetings... You're Wasting Your Best LeaderAsk ten people what a ScrumMaster does, and you're likely to hear ten different answers."They run the Daily Stand-up.""They schedule Sprint Planning.""They update Jira.""They remove impediments.""They're the Agile coach.""They're the team's project manager."Some of those answers are partially correct.Most of them are incomplete.And that's becoming one of the biggest challenges facing Agile organizations today.Somewhere along the way, many companies unintentionally shrank one of the most influential leadership roles on an Agile team into something much smaller.A meeting facilitator.A calendar manager.A process referee.Someone who reminds everyone when the Sprint Review starts.That's not what the ScrumMaster role was designed to be.In fact, if that's all your ScrumMaster is doing...You're probably missing the greatest opportunity that role has to offer.Let's imagine two ScrumMasters.The first arrives every morning with a checklist.Start the Daily Scrum.Update the board.Send reminders.Schedule Retrospectives.Close completed stories.Generate reports.Stay organized.Nothing wrong with those activities.They're important.But now let's look at a second ScrumMaster.This person notices that two team members have stopped collaborating.They coach a Product Owner struggling to prioritize competing stakeholder requests.They help leadership understand why multitasking is slowing delivery.They facilitate a difficult conversation before it becomes a lasting conflict.They identify organizational policies that create unnecessary delays.They mentor new leaders.They build trust across departments.They help people solve problems they didn't even realize existed.Which ScrumMaster creates greater long-term value?The answer seems obvious.Yet many organizations still spend far more time measuring the first set of activities than the second.Why?Because administration is visible.Leadership often isn't.You can see a meeting on a calendar.You can't always see trust being built.You can count completed ceremonies.It's much harder to measure improved communication.You can track whether a Retrospective happened.It's much more difficult to quantify whether people actually feel safe speaking honestly during it.That's the challenge.The most valuable work ScrumMasters perform often happens between the ceremonies.Not during them.- [website] ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.agiledad.com/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠- [instagram] ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.instagram.com/agile_coach/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠- [facebook] ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.facebook.com/RealAgileDad/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠- [Linkedin] ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.linkedin.com/in/leehenson/

Welkom bij een gloednieuwe aflevering van de Product Owner podcast, dé plek voor jouw wekelijkse dosis product-inspiratie. Vandaag duiken we diep in de praktijk met twee absolute rotten in het vak. Jochem gaat deze week met Henny en Dolf van de Product Owner Group in gesprek. In deze aflevering bespreken ze: Hoe 'product owner land' er momenteel écht voorstaat in Nederland. Wat jij als startende PO kunt leren van doorgewinterde freelancers met ervaring bij meer dan 10 verschillende organisaties. Of het traditionele agile team op de schop gaat en we straks überhaupt nog wel Scrum Masters hebben. Een must listen voor iedere PO die sneller wil groeien door de ultieme inside tips en fouten van ervaren rotten te stelen. De Product Owner podcast is een initiatief van productowner.nl

Aliu Adewale: The Counterintuitive Fix—How Collapsing the Jira Board Sparked Collaboration Read the full Show Notes and search through the world's largest audio library on Agile and Scrum directly on the Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast website: http://bit.ly/SMTP_ShowNotes.   "Collaboration is the foundation of a successful Scrum team." - Aliu Adewale   Aliu walked into a team where the daily standup was theater. Developers delivered their tickets and forgot about them. QA picked up "their" column. Front-end, back-end, senior architect, junior developer—everyone was a champion of their own silo. Nobody engaged during refinement. Nobody called anything out. The board had close to ten columns, one per specialty, and it was working exactly as designed: as a handoff system. Aliu's diagnosis is sharp—the foundation of the team's problem wasn't the people; it was the tool. The Jira board was visualizing silos and the team was living up to it. The fix was counterintuitive: he collapsed the board from nine columns to three—To Do, In Progress, Done. Once "In Progress" was the only place where work lived, nobody could hide. A QA needing to know when a ticket would be ready had to talk to the developer. A stakeholder asking for status meant everyone on the ticket had to communicate. The team had no choice but to collaborate. As Vasco frames it in the episode: by creating the smaller problem of "hiding status," Aliu solved the bigger problem of "no collaboration." Sometimes you have to make things a little worse so they can get much better.   In this segment, we refer to the Agile value individuals and interactions over processes and tools, and to the recognition that the tools we choose shape the behaviors we get.   Self-reflection Question: Is your Jira board designed to enable collaboration, or to enable handoffs? Featured Book of the Week: Surrounded by Idiots by Thomas Erikson For Aliu, the book that most inspired him as a Scrum Master is Surrounded by Idiots by Thomas Erikson—a book he discovered through a recommendation on this very podcast. The provocative title pulled him in; the content gave him something he could use every day. As a Scrum Master, you work with people from different backgrounds, different communication styles, different ways of seeing the world. The book maps four personality patterns and, as Aliu puts it, "it might not be a hundred over a hundred, but at least ninety over a hundred about personality and human relation." For someone already working on his emotional intelligence, it became a tool for understanding why a message that landed clearly with one team member completely missed another—and what to do about it.   [The Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast Recommends]

Aliu Adewale: The New Scrum Master Trap—Being In Everyone's Business to Look Busy Read the full Show Notes and search through the world's largest audio library on Agile and Scrum directly on the Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast website: http://bit.ly/SMTP_ShowNotes.   "Sometimes the best architecture and design comes from a self-organizing team." - Aliu Adewale   When Aliu first became a Scrum Master, he wanted to be everywhere. New to the role, new to the organization, with a new team relying on him to deliver, he scheduled extra check-ins, sat in on everything, and made sure his manager could see him working. The result wasn't visibility—it was suffocation. The team felt he was in their business, and the deliveries he was trying to protect got worse, not better. Aliu's wake-up call came from his coach, who told him a sentence he still carries: "Stepping back gives your team the space to take ownership and unlock their true potential." The hardest thing a new Scrum Master can do is let things roll on their own for a Sprint or two and adjust through the retrospective. But once Aliu did it, the team started self-organizing, owning their day-to-day, and delivering beyond his expectations. The lesson he names is Agile principle number 5: build projects around motivated individuals, give them the support they need, and trust them to get the job done. The deeper insight from Vasco in this episode: when we want to be in our team's business, it's usually because we don't trust ourselves to know enough—so we try to know everything.   In this episode, we refer to Turn the Ship Around! by David Marquet, which Vasco recommends for any Scrum Master learning to step back, and to the Agile Manifesto.   Self-reflection Question: What are you doing this week to "be visible" that the team would actually be better off without?   [The Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast Recommends]

Gunnar Fischer: From Staying in Your Line to The Connected Product Owner—Two Patterns Every Scrum Master Should Recognize The Great Product Owner: The Connected PO Who Makes Information Flow Read the full Show Notes and search through the world's largest audio library on Agile and Scrum directly on the Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast website: http://bit.ly/SMTP_ShowNotes.   "This Product Owner didn't need to be the smartest person in the room, but everybody knew, okay, this is a really smart guy." - Gunnar Fischer   The best Product Owner Gunnar ever worked with was what he calls the connected PO. This person had a deep professional network—inside the company and with the customer—and could talk to anyone: a colleague, the client, a brand-new team member they were onboarding. They were socially sharp without being shallow. They could disagree clearly, even harshly, and then turn around and say, "now let's talk about something else," with kindness. When this PO said no, it was a no people respected; when they said yes, it was a yes people trusted, because everyone knew the PO could push back. The praise behind their back matched the praise in the room. They had a private life, too—not married to the job, which made them a more well-rounded human. But the specifically Product Owner skill Gunnar names is this: they could look at the product across different time horizons—what does it need to do in one month, three months, one year—and they kept juggling functionality, contracts, customer situation, and economic reality at the same time. Their technical background helped, but they understood the line: "It's not my job to be the technically most savvy guy, but I'm willing to share my knowledge with everybody." As Gunnar puts it, the difference between a subject matter expert and a Product Owner is that the Product Owner makes the information flow.   Self-reflection Question: Does your Product Owner make information flow across the team, the customer, and management—or are they hoarding context as the "expert"? The Bad Product Owner: The Stay-in-Your-Line, Accept-Your-Fate PO Read the full Show Notes and search through the world's largest audio library on Agile and Scrum directly on the Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast website: http://bit.ly/SMTP_ShowNotes.   "You manage the backlog, you do the customer calls, you write the user stories—but you were not involved in any of the bigger decisions." - Gunnar Fischer   The anti-pattern Gunnar sees most often isn't malice—it's resignation. Most Product Owners aren't given the access or the permissions they need to be successful, and so they accept their fate. They manage the backlog, take the customer calls, write the user stories, sometimes talk to management—but they aren't part of the bigger decisions: ROI on a feature, whether to build it at all, the product vision a year out. Management keeps those decisions to itself, and the accept-your-fate PO doesn't challenge that arrangement. They stay in their line. They don't push back when sales drops in an urgent request that ruins the plan. They don't challenge the developers when an estimate feels wrong. They become very protective of the things they can control—their privileges, their processes, the artifacts—and when the bad times come, they get thrown under the bus. Gunnar's diagnosis is direct: the role of a great PO is to have constructive, respectful disagreements at every level—with the client, with management, with the team—and to be okay disappointing people. "Once you see that people go down to the mechanics, then it's a really bad smell, I would say." Saying yes to everything doesn't make you safe; it makes you replaceable.   In this segment, we refer to Geoff Watts' Scrum Mastery and its line about the great Scrum Master being dispensable and wanted—a frame that applies to Product Owners just as well.   Self-reflection Question: Where in the past month did your Product Owner say "yes" when the right answer was a respectful "no, not yet"?   [The Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast Recommends]

Gunnar Fischer: Healthy Flow of Value in a Healthy Work Environment—The Ecosystem Definition of Success Read the full Show Notes and search through the world's largest audio library on Agile and Scrum directly on the Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast website: http://bit.ly/SMTP_ShowNotes.   "A successful Scrum Master is healthy flow of value in a healthy work environment." - Gunnar Fischer   Gunnar's definition of success comes in one phrase that hides a lot of work: healthy flow of value in a healthy work environment. The work environment, he says, is an ecosystem—it doesn't have tigers, but it has plenty of layers and forces that can throw the balance off. You start at the team: are we reaching our goals most of the time? (If always, you might be playing too safe.) Then you move outward to the customer: who are we doing this work for, and are they succeeding? Then to the company: what's good for the customer might still be bad for the financials. And finally back to the individual: a team can be hitting its goals, the customer can be happy, the company can be making money, and a person on the team can still be quietly under-challenged and ready to leave. Gunnar measures the flow side with the four Kanban guide metrics—cycle time, throughput, work item age, and work in progress—but he keeps reminding himself that finishing isn't the same as getting feedback. Did the customer use what we built? He's been demotivated more than once by seeing a "very important" piece of work go untouched after delivery. And then there's the social side: the level of healthy, constructive disagreement, and reading the room when colleagues from a culture that doesn't say "no" go silent.   In this episode, we refer to Kanban flow metrics (cycle time, throughput, work item age, WIP) and the importance of treating the backlog as options, not promises.   Self-reflection Question: When was the last time you measured not whether the team finished something, but whether the customer actually used it? Featured Retrospective Format for the Week: What, So What, Now What? Gunnar's favorite retrospective format is What, So What, Now What?, one of the Liberating Structures (and free to read up on online). He used it after a tense production deployment that succeeded but left the team rattled. Instead of jumping to "we need to do exactly this," he forced the team to split their thinking: what are the facts we can describe, so what is our interpretation of those facts, and now what are the possible options going forward. Sounds simple. But the brain hates incomplete pictures—it auto-completes them with speculation. That instinct kept our ancestors alive when they couldn't see the full tiger behind the bushes; it ruins our reasoning at work. By making the team distinguish hard between fact and interpretation, the format produced three concrete ideas. Within three months, the team had implemented all three, and things improved. Gunnar's broader takeaway about retrospectives: don't run them right after the event ("get a coffee, step away from your desk for fifteen minutes"), don't wait two months either, and—above all—"people need to look like winners when they're going into a difficult retrospective." Then honor their time by following up. If nobody else does the follow-up, the Scrum Master has to be the reminder.   [The Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast Recommends]

Bad Agile Is Dying... And That's the Best News Agile Has Had in YearsAgile isn't dying.Bad Agile is.And honestly...that's fantastic news.For nearly two decades, organizations around the world raced to become "Agile."Some invested heavily in coaching.Others purchased new software.Many reorganized entire departments.Unfortunately, somewhere along the journey, a surprising number of organizations confused Agile with process.Stand-ups became status meetings.Sprint Planning became project planning.Retrospectives became complaint sessions.Story points became performance metrics.Velocity became a management scorecard.Scrum Masters became meeting coordinators.Product Owners became backlog administrators.The framework remained.The mindset quietly disappeared.Over time, employees became frustrated.Executives questioned the investment.Teams felt overwhelmed by ceremonies that no longer seemed connected to delivering value.Then something predictable happened.Organizations didn't reject Agile.They rejected bad experiences disguised as Agile.That's an important distinction.- [website] ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.agiledad.com/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠- [instagram] ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.instagram.com/agile_coach/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠- [facebook] ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.facebook.com/RealAgileDad/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠- [Linkedin] ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.linkedin.com/in/leehenson/

AI Won't Replace ScrumMasters... Or Will It?Will artificial intelligence replace the ScrumMaster?It's a headline that keeps resurfacing. Social media is full of bold predictions. Industry blogs continue debating it. Conference sessions are packed with people looking for answers. And if you've spent any time on LinkedIn recently, you've probably seen more than a few posts claiming that AI is either the greatest thing to happen to Agile—or the beginning of the end.- [website] ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.agiledad.com/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠- [instagram] ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.instagram.com/agile_coach/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠- [facebook] ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.facebook.com/RealAgileDad/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠- [Linkedin] ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.linkedin.com/in/leehenson/

Gunnar Fischer: The Anti-Pattern Bingo Team—When Success Is a Zero-Sum Game Read the full Show Notes and search through the world's largest audio library on Agile and Scrum directly on the Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast website: http://bit.ly/SMTP_ShowNotes.   "This was neither Scrum, nor a team. It was more like the anti-pattern bingo team." - Gunnar Fischer   When Gunnar took his first job abroad, he walked straight into what he calls the "anti-pattern bingo team"—a supposed Scrum team that was neither Scrum nor a team. The company was in trouble, the team had a bad reputation and was used as a punching bag, the manager-of-manager treated them like a stepchild, and the new manager didn't seem to know what he had signed up for. The team members themselves didn't really want to work together. The goals slipped. Decisions were made in back rooms, outside the official meetings. And underneath it all sat the most corrosive belief Gunnar names: that success is a zero-sum game—if you win, I lose. With that mindset, there is no team, just individuals defending turf. One pattern stuck with him so clearly he gave it a name: sandcastle planning. The team would finish a Sprint planning, agree on a goal, and the manager would walk in right after the meeting and overturn the whole thing with his own priorities. Over time, the team stopped putting effort into planning. Why build the castle if someone will trample it? Even worse, when an escalation finally surfaced, Gunnar—an immigrant—was told that as a German, he must be "very authoritarian." A label, served up as analysis. That was the moment he knew the team would never have safe disagreements, never reach the right level of challenge, never recover.   In this segment, we talk about scrum master anti-patterns, the corrosive effect of treating people as labels, and how the absence of an explicit reason for the team's existence makes everything else collapse.   Self-reflection Question: Does your team have a clear, explicit reason for existing—or are you just a group that shares a technology, a building, or a reporting line? Featured Book of the Week: Scrum Mastery (2nd Edition) by Geoff Watts For Gunnar, the book that shaped him most as a Scrum Master is Scrum Mastery (2nd Edition) by Geoff Watts—what he calls "the noble knight of Scrum books." He first read it just after a Scrum course and thought, "What should I even do with this kind of wisdom?" Years later he came back to it and understood. A few years after that, he became modest about it: these are truths, but it's about making them true—and watching for when they aren't. The book is full of phrases like "a good Scrum Master is indispensable; a great Scrum Master is dispensable and wanted." That last line captured it perfectly for him: success isn't being unneeded, it's being chosen. As Gunnar puts it: "In times when everybody is challenged and people are making fun of agile practitioners, this brings back all of the ideals of what a Scrum Master is really about." You can also listen to our previous episodes with Geoff Watts on the podcast.   [The Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast Recommends]

Gunnar Fischer: Accepting Not Being Accepted—The People-Pleasing Trap That Broke a Scrum Master Read the full Show Notes and search through the world's largest audio library on Agile and Scrum directly on the Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast website: http://bit.ly/SMTP_ShowNotes.   "I accepted not being accepted, and that was a big failure." - Gunnar Fischer   Gunnar's biggest failure wasn't a single bad decision—it was an attitude he carried into work for far too long. As an Agile coach and Scrum Master, he watched a new high-ranking manager arrive who didn't like the team, didn't respect them, never even officially introduced herself. And Gunnar did the worst possible thing: he played along. He did the people-pleasing dance without ever getting feedback, recognition, or even a basic conversation. He formed ideas as a team, did the work, asked for nothing back—and accepted that nobody looked at the work. In hindsight, the Scrum value of respect was the missing piece. "The members of a Scrum team respect each other to be capable, independent people, and are also respected as such by the others." Gunnar respected others. He did not demand that respect for himself. The wake-up came in Ecuador—swimming with sharks in the open sea, he realized he felt safer there than in his own office. So he updated his CV, took an internal switch, and finally stepped out of victim mode. His real insight is uncomfortable: if you read about something good—getting time for your own development, being heard, being respected—and you instinctively deflect it or make excuses for why you can't have it, that's a very clear indicator you've internalized being small.   In this episode, we refer to The Coach's Casebook by Geoff Watts, specifically the chapter on people-pleasing.   Self-reflection Question: When was the last time someone described a healthy professional environment to you, and you found yourself making excuses for why you couldn't have it?   [The Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast Recommends]

Olaitan Fashanu: The PO Who Doesn't Care vs the PO Who Always Has the Answer Read the full Show Notes and search through the world's largest audio library on Agile and Scrum directly on the Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast website: http://bit.ly/SMTP_ShowNotes.   In this episode, we refer to a recurring theme in past podcast episodes—the proxy product owner who can't make decisions because they're not theirs to make. The Great Product Owner: Always Available, Always Decisive, Always Has the Context Read the full Show Notes and search through the world's largest audio library on Agile and Scrum directly on the Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast website: http://bit.ly/SMTP_ShowNotes.   "There was nothing you tell, any questions you have about a particular feature that this guy doesn't have an answer to. And that really moved the team so fast." - Olaitan Fashanu   The best PO Olaitan ever worked with was the mirror opposite of every anti-pattern he'd seen. Deeply involved in refinement. Took backlog management seriously. Always brought the context. Always available to the team. And—maybe most importantly—always ready to make a decision when devs surfaced trade-offs. The team could ask any question about any feature, and the answer was right there. Not "let me check," not "I'll get back to you," not "what do you think?"—a decision. That single quality, Olaitan says, was what moved the team faster than anything else. As a Scrum Master, when you see a great PO at work, you also see the amplifying waves of impact: motivation rises, quality rises, ownership grows. Olaitan's takeaway is sharp: the success of our job depends on how well the product owner does theirs.   Self-reflection Question: When was the last time your PO made a real-time decision that unblocked the team in a single conversation—and what's preventing that from being the norm? The Bad Product Owner: Doesn't Care About Impact, Can't Make Decisions Read the full Show Notes and search through the world's largest audio library on Agile and Scrum directly on the Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast website: http://bit.ly/SMTP_ShowNotes.   "The product owner cares about delivery. We just need to release to the customer. That is something I don't like." - Olaitan Fashanu   Olaitan describes two anti-patterns wrapped into one bad-PO type. The first: the PO who doesn't care about the impact of their work on the team. Tickets dropped without context. No refinement. No problem framing. Just "ship by end of month." The data shows up in Jira if you're paying attention—patterns of churn, quality issues, customer complaints, slow market response. Beyond the numbers, the team loses motivation, frustration creeps in, and eventually you lose the team entirely. The second anti-pattern, layered on top: the PO who can't make decisions. Developers come back with two options and the trade-offs—and the PO can't pick one. Vasco connects it to the proxy PO pattern explored in past episodes—a PO whose decisions aren't actually theirs to make. The cost is the same either way: the team stalls, ownership erodes, and stakeholder conflict grows.   In this segment, we refer to the proxy PO anti-pattern explored in earlier episodes of the podcast.   Self-reflection Question: Is your PO unable to decide—or unable to be allowed to decide? The difference changes which conversation you need to have, and with whom.   [The Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast Recommends]

Olaitan Fashanu: I Love Data—Why Success for a Scrum Master Means Doing the Hard Measurement Work Read the full Show Notes and search through the world's largest audio library on Agile and Scrum directly on the Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast website: http://bit.ly/SMTP_ShowNotes.   "You don't get better by not trying to be better." - Vasco Duarte (channeling Olaitan's own discipline)   For Olaitan, success as a Scrum Master comes down to two things—team effectiveness and team health—and he refuses to guess at either. Twice a year, in what he calls his winter and summer cycles, he runs a structured team health check survey to capture how confident people feel, whether they hold each other accountable, and whether psychological safety is real or theatrical. Between those checkpoints, he runs constant one-on-ones—and not just with developers. QAs, designers, the PO. Everyone gets the conversation. He pulls outside-in feedback from customers and partner teams too, because effectiveness measured only from the inside is fiction. "I love data. Maybe it's my background in mathematics. I love looking at patterns, comparing things." The work is real, the load is real—but for Olaitan, refusing to do it is the same as refusing to grow.   Self-reflection Question: If you had to prove to yourself today that your team is genuinely effective and healthy, what data would you actually have—and what would you only be guessing at? Featured Retrospective Format for the Week: Start / Stop / Continue (and a twist Vasco offers Olaitan) Olaitan's go-to is the simple Start / Stop / Continue format—the easiest way he's found to get even quiet developers to engage, especially at the start of a new iteration. Vasco offers him a twist mid-episode: what if you only used one of the three? When the team is overwhelmed, run a Stop-only retro. When a release just shipped and energy is high, run a Start-only retro. Breaking the format pattern creates a small spark of "wait, why is this different today?"—which is often exactly the energy a tired team needs. Olaitan also shares a second favorite: the Friction vs. Drivers (or Fuel) format—mapping what's slowing the team down on one side and what's actively energizing them on the other. The two sides of the same coin, made visible.   [The Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast Recommends]

As AI becomes embedded in software development workflows, many leaders assume the biggest changes will happen in coding. The reality may be very different. The future belongs to AI Team Systems—the structures, feedback loops, and operational practices that transform rapid development into meaningful business outcomes. During Building Better Developers Season 28 Episode 9, Dave Borzillo explored how Agile principles may evolve in an AI-powered environment and why human collaboration remains essential.   About David Borzillo David Borzillo is an Agile coach, author, speaker, and organizational improvement advocate with more than three decades of experience spanning software development, leadership, Agile transformation, and product delivery. Through his Better Ways of Working platform, he helps organizations improve collaboration, reduce operational friction, and create sustainable delivery systems. He is the author of Sanity at Scale and Who Killed Agile? (co-authored), and United Agility, and hosts the Better Ways of Working podcast. Follow David at: https://betterwaysofworking.com/about.htm Bonus: Free Kindle Promotion

For 17 years, the Give Thanks for Scrum (GTFS) event in Boston has reflected the evolution of Scrum itself, from early education and experience reports to scaling, business agility, and now AI integration.In this episode, Dave West sits down with GTFS founder and Managing Director of Improving Agility, Daniel Mezick to explore how the event began, sparked by bringing Jeff Sutherland and Ken Schwaber together during Thanksgiving week in Boston, and how its themes have evolved alongside the Agile movement.The 2025 event returned to an in-person format and centered on three critical themes:Delivering tangible resultsIncorporating AI into Scrum practiceThe evolving role of the Scrum MasterDaniel and Dave discuss why empiricism matters more than ever, how Scrum Masters must understand executive psychology, and what socio-technical design means in an AI-enabled world. They also explore whether large agile frameworks may give way to more focused, empirical approaches.Looking further into the future, the conversation turns to AI's expanding role, practical application over hype, and a blended in-person/online format to grow the global community.If you care about the future of Scrum, stakeholder delight, and navigating uncertainty with empiricism, this episode is for you.

Olaitan Fashanu: Three Teams, Three Backlogs, One Feature—Can You Make Them See Each Other? Read the full Show Notes and search through the world's largest audio library on Agile and Scrum directly on the Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast website: http://bit.ly/SMTP_ShowNotes.   "How do we ensure that these teams actually work together to show the same data?" - Olaitan Fashanu   Olaitan brings a problem most Scrum Masters in scaled environments will recognize. Three teams. Three separate backlogs. One product, accessed across app, web, and support channels. Leadership made a top-down team topologies decision: split the work to move faster. Predictable result—each team optimizes for their own backlog, blind to what the others are building, sometimes shipping the same feature twice with different behaviors. The product owners know there's overlap. The teams love the idea of linking tickets across backlogs. They just won't maintain the habit. Olaitan and Vasco walk through experiments together: a sync between POs, joint refinement sessions, linking tickets, putting "this is also being built by Team B" notes at the top of stories. The deeper insight: the Scrum Master's job is to keep surfacing information until a habit forms. As Vasco's old lifting coach put it—you find the imbalance, you get rid of the imbalance, one by one. That's how you get stronger.   In this episode, we refer to team topologies and the practice of surfacing information across team boundaries.   Self-reflection Question: Where in your organization are teams unknowingly building the same thing twice—and what's the smallest experiment you could run this week to make that visible?   [The Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast Recommends]

Olaitan Fashanu: When the New PO Stops Refining—and the Team Starts Self-Destructing Read the full Show Notes and search through the world's largest audio library on Agile and Scrum directly on the Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast website: http://bit.ly/SMTP_ShowNotes.   "If we're actually doing the job of refining this ticket properly, then we will not be creating this tension in the team." - Olaitan Fashanu   The team was working well. They had a strong PO who came to refinement with the problem clearly framed: this is what we want to solve, here's the context, here's the user story, here are the acceptance criteria. The team picked it up, refined it, ran with it. Then change came. A new PO joined—and the routine collapsed. The new PO cared about one thing: hitting the delivery date. Tickets dropped into Jira with no context, no problem statement, no acceptance criteria. Just "this needs to ship by end of month." Within weeks, Olaitan saw the symptoms cascade through the team. Developers asked designers what tickets even meant. QA struggled to maintain quality. Tension built. The diagnosis was clear: refinement had broken. His fix? Bring back the Definition of Ready as a non-negotiable shared standard, and introduce a product trio—business viability, technical feasibility, and design usability collaborating on every story before it reaches the rest of the team.   In this segment, we talk about the Definition of Ready and the product trio collaboration model.   Self-reflection Question: What's the symptom you're seeing in your team right now—and could the real source be how stories are getting refined, not how they're getting built? Featured Book of the Week: The Secrets of Facilitation by Michael Wilkinson Olaitan calls out The Secrets of Facilitation by Michael Wilkinson as the book that shaped how he handles difficult moments. The book teaches the power of asking the right question at the right time—clarifying questions, probing questions, the questions that drive a stuck group forward. "You will understand how, when to ask clarifying questions, ask really powerful questions that will help you drive or probably help you reach your goal in any session you find yourself." For Olaitan, the biggest payoff was learning to manage group dynamics in real time—what to do when something said in a meeting lands badly, when a comment threatens to derail the room. As a Scrum Master, you live in those moments. This book hands you a toolkit for them.   [The Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast Recommends]

Olaitan Fashanu: The Scrum Master Who Tried to Force His Way In—and Got Schooled Read the full Show Notes and search through the world's largest audio library on Agile and Scrum directly on the Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast website: http://bit.ly/SMTP_ShowNotes.   "When you want to make things work, you need to find a way to carry people along. Lead, not by forcing your way on the team, because you're working with smart people, you're working with professionals." - Olaitan Fashanu   When Olaitan transitioned from project management into the Scrum Master role, he carried his old habits with him: enforce, push, drive. Then he walked into a team of senior developers. In one retrospective, a team member casually suggested that someone could help set up Jira properly. Olaitan took it personally—wasn't that his job? The next day in the daily standup, he called it out publicly. The reaction told him everything. The team member shut down. The PO pulled him aside afterward to say, "We could have had a better discussion around this." That moment, Olaitan realized that having no formal authority isn't a weakness to compensate for with force—it's the whole point. The job is to influence, to nudge, to coach—even when the conversations are hard. Especially when they are hard.   Self-reflection Question: When was the last time you raised a difficult topic in a way that closed the conversation instead of opening it—and what would it have cost you to bring it up differently?   [The Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast Recommends]

“We have twelve scrum masters. Why is nothing working?” If you have ever asked some version of that question, this episode is for you.Kate Megaw, Anu Smalley and Ryan Smith dig into the challenge they hear in almost every class they teach, a real lack of role clarity. Companies send a strong project manager to a two day course, hand them a new title, and then wonder why nothing changes. The honest answer is that nobody ever defined what the role is actually accountable for. This episode unpacks the difference between roles and accountabilities, why a scrum master is not optional, and how to define seats around outcomes instead of titles. Along the way Kate and Anu have a friendly fight over RACI, whether it hardens into swim lanes or serves as a living guiding light, and what responsible really means at a startup versus a large enterprise.What we cover:“We have twelve scrum masters, why is nothing working?”Roles vs. accountabilities, and why the org chart liesThe RACI debate: swim lanes vs. guiding lightThe kitchen sink job description with 45 impossible dutiesStart with outcomes, not titles, and revisit at every kickoff

What happens when a team buys the board, holds the ceremonies, and completely misses the point?The team at EM Solutions Inc. officially went Agile. They have the Scrum board. They have the standups. They have the retrospectives. They even have an Elmo doll.What they don't have is the mindset.Meet Brett — the Product Owner who treats the backlog like a throne. Dina — the Scrum Master, five-foot-three and impossible to move. Henry — who eats half the croissants before anyone else arrives and grabs the cleanest stories before planning starts. Shri — who built a checklist for the checklist. Vlad — for whom everything is a fire alarm. Dominic — whose Daily Scrum updates reference events from 2019. Paula — who cannot write a single line of code without a pairing partner. Julia — who turns every sprint review into a three-course meal when everyone ordered a snack. And Barry — the VP who says he supports Agile and then tries to bribe Vlad in the parking lot.Into this beautifully broken team walks Phill — trainer, coach, and a man who has the laminated cards to prove he has seen all of this before.Agile Circus is a business fable built around twelve real dysfunctions that real teams live with every day. Every chapter delivers the chaos in full, hilarious detail — then lands the coaching lesson: Manifesto values, sprint mechanics, planning poker, velocity, user stories, retrospectives that produce real commitments, and the truth no certification exam covers: the badge is not the achievement. The behavior is.The Agile book that makes the learning stick because you will not stop laughing long enough to put it down.Perfect for: PMP® and PMI-ACP® candidates, Scrum Masters, Product Owners, Agile coaches, project managers, engineering leaders, and anyone who has ever survived a forty-seven-minute Daily Scrum.Phill Akinwale — OPM3, PMP®, PMI-ACP®, PMI-RMP®, CSM — trainer, coach, host of pmradio.org.Get your copy. Update your Elmo. Let's move on.

What happens when a team buys the board, holds the ceremonies, and completely misses the point?The team at EM Solutions Inc. officially went Agile. They have the Scrum board. They have the standups. They have the retrospectives. They even have an Elmo doll.What they don't have is the mindset.Meet Brett — the Product Owner who treats the backlog like a throne. Dina — the Scrum Master, five-foot-three and impossible to move. Henry — who eats half the croissants before anyone else arrives and grabs the cleanest stories before planning starts. Shri — who built a checklist for the checklist. Vlad — for whom everything is a fire alarm. Dominic — whose Daily Scrum updates reference events from 2019. Paula — who cannot write a single line of code without a pairing partner. Julia — who turns every sprint review into a three-course meal when everyone ordered a snack. And Barry — the VP who says he supports Agile and then tries to bribe Vlad in the parking lot.Into this beautifully broken team walks Phill — trainer, coach, and a man who has the laminated cards to prove he has seen all of this before.Agile Circus is a business fable built around twelve real dysfunctions that real teams live with every day. Every chapter delivers the chaos in full, hilarious detail — then lands the coaching lesson: Manifesto values, sprint mechanics, planning poker, velocity, user stories, retrospectives that produce real commitments, and the truth no certification exam covers: the badge is not the achievement. The behavior is.The Agile book that makes the learning stick because you will not stop laughing long enough to put it down.Perfect for: PMP® and PMI-ACP® candidates, Scrum Masters, Product Owners, Agile coaches, project managers, engineering leaders, and anyone who has ever survived a forty-seven-minute Daily Scrum.Phill Akinwale — OPM3, PMP®, PMI-ACP®, PMI-RMP®, CSM — trainer, coach, host of pmradio.org.Get your copy. Update your Elmo. Let's move on.

Aimé Flemm: When The Team Tells You You're Doing Too Much — That's The Success Signal Read the full Show Notes and search through the world's largest audio library on Agile and Scrum directly on the Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast website: http://bit.ly/SMTP_ShowNotes.   "It's when you know you're on the right track — when the teams start complaining that you're doing too much." - Aimé Flemm   Aimé got the feedback nobody wants to hear: "You're being too much in the front of the group." His first reaction was to take it personally. Then he saw it for what it was — the success signal. The team was telling him: let us do it. After months of helping them build self-managing capability, they hit a tipping point. They wanted the floor. He stepped back, started "actively doing nothing," sat down and crossed his arms. When they brought a problem, he asked: "What are you going to do about this? Have you tried that already?" But Aimé pushed back on himself in this conversation, and accepted the reframe: the Scrum Master isn't less needed at the tipping point — they're needed differently. The shift is from teaching and facilitating ceremonies to nudging with questions, helping the team reach out when they're stuck, surfacing issues with the PO and outside stakeholders. The focus shifts when you reach success. Don't take "you're doing too much" as offense — take it as your cue to change levels.   Self-reflection Question: When the team last pushed back on something you were doing, did you take it as feedback to defend — or as a signal that they're ready to take more ownership? Featured Retrospective Format for the Week: Retromat + Liberating Structures Aimé's favorite retro? "If I don't have to do it myself." Once teams reach the tipping point, he uses a pull system — they run their own retros, he checks in a few days later. But when he does facilitate, he layers two tools. First, Retromat — not just for the techniques, but for the flow: check-in, gather data, generate insights, decide what to do, checkout. Second, Liberating Structures on top of that flow. His favorite is Impromptu Networking — small groups answer a question, then re-form in different groups. "It's like a beehive. There's so much energy. It's bubbling." He's used it cross-org, his team and the client team in the same room. And his strong recommendation: do retrospectives on-site whenever you can.   [The Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast Recommends]

Aimé Flemm: Culture Follows Structure — Why Some Teams Self-Destruct By Design Read the full Show Notes and search through the world's largest audio library on Agile and Scrum directly on the Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast website: http://bit.ly/SMTP_ShowNotes.   "Culture follows structure. The destructive tendencies of a team are the consequence of how the organization is actually structured." - Aimé Flemm   Aimé doesn't blame teams when they go toxic. He looks at the org chart. At his first gig, the UX-only team grew bitter — making screens nobody used, blocked from talking to customers, drowning in dependencies. The team's behavior wasn't a coaching problem. It was a structural one. At his current company, building backend software for EV charging stations, he watched the opposite happen: leadership flipped seven component teams (backend, billing, etc.) into seven end-to-end feature teams with one Product Owner. Two-week sprints. Switching costs collapsed — they could decide on Wednesday to change direction, refine on Thursday, and have all seven teams pivot together by the next sprint. The org became truly adaptive. Aimé's question to every Scrum Master listening: is your organization fit for purpose? If the work is predictable and specialism-heavy, component teams can work. If you need adaptability, the structure has to match. Don't coach behavior that the structure forces.   In this segment, we talk about Larman's Laws of Organizational Behavior, the Star Model by Jay Galbraith, and Org Topologies.   Self-reflection Question: Look at the team you're coaching. Which of their "destructive habits" might actually be a rational response to the structure you've put them in? Featured Book of the Week: Large-Scale Scrum: More with LeSS by Bas Vodde and Craig Larman This week, Aimé recommends two books that complement each other. First — and his "holy bible" — is Large-Scale Scrum: More with LeSS by Bas Vodde and Craig Larman. "I remember reading this for the first time. It took me two weeks, the whole book. And I was just constantly texting people — 'this is it! It all makes sense now. I finally know what to do.'" For the how of organizational change — workshop ideas, possible structures, change tactics, and the people side — LeSS is the book. The companion book Aimé pairs with it is 10x Organization by Alexey Krevitsky, Roland Flemm, and Craig Larman — strong on the what and the why, with a 2x2 visual map that helps you explain to management where you are today, where the market needs you to be, and what should change. (You can also listen to our episode with Bas Vodde and our BONUS episode with Roland Flemm for a deeper view.)   [The Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast Recommends]

Aimé Flemm: Why Solo Scrum Masters Get Fired — The Coalition Of The Willing Read the full Show Notes and search through the world's largest audio library on Agile and Scrum directly on the Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast website: http://bit.ly/SMTP_ShowNotes.   "It doesn't make sense to try and change a system of 2,000 people on your own." - Aimé Flemm   Three months into his first gig out of consultancy, Aimé got the call: you're fired. He was at a Dutch pension fund — 2,000 people, deeply ingrained legacy structure — serving as Scrum Master to three component teams, including a UX-only team that couldn't ship anything end-to-end. Full of ambition and fresh ideas from a meetup, he pushed to restructure the teams to be cross-functional. His manager said "yeah, go for it." But Aimé was the only one pushing. He was, in his words, "poking and fighting the system way too much that they had built." So they didn't extend the contract. The lesson he carries from that firing reshaped how he approaches every change initiative since: do not try to do it alone. Find the coalition of the willing first — other Scrum Masters, other change agents, the volunteers — and build a network before you start pushing structural change. Use Scrum Master Syncs, communities of practice, even pizza budgets. Let the change spread like an oil spill. It takes time. It doesn't happen overnight. But you'll still have a job at the end of it.   In this episode, we refer to the coalition of the willing and change management tactics for Scrum Masters working in resistant systems.   Self-reflection Question: Where in your current organization are you trying to change the system alone — and who could become your first ally if you stopped pushing and started recruiting?   [The Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast Recommends]

Maria Skvortsova: The Yes-Man Product Owner and the Scrum Master Who Became a Proxy for the Proxy In this episode, we refer to User Story Mapping and the MoSCoW prioritization method. The Great Product Owner: Structure Over Gut Feeling — When a Well-Shaped Backlog Speaks for Itself Read the full Show Notes and search through the world's largest audio library on Agile and Scrum directly on the Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast website: http://bit.ly/SMTP_ShowNotes.   "The indicator of a good product owner is a well-shaped backlog — with priorities, with values, with efforts. You definitely know that you pull from the top, and it is the most valuable thing you should work on." — Maria Skvortsova   For Maria, the best product owners she's worked with share one trait: they bring structure. Not rigidity — structure. They use techniques like user story mapping to make priorities visual for everyone. They use value-effort matrices instead of gut feelings. They apply methods like MoSCoW to give the backlog a clear, unambiguous order. The result? A developer never has to ask "what should I work on next?" — the answer is always at the top of the backlog. Maria, drawing on her decade as a C++ developer, knows firsthand how frustrating it is to chase down a BA or PO just to figure out what to build next. A well-ordered backlog doesn't just help the team move faster — it also makes it easier for the product owner to communicate with the business, because every decision has data behind it, not just intuition.   Self-reflection Question: Could a new team member look at your product backlog right now and immediately know what to work on next — and why that item is the most valuable? The Bad Product Owner: The Yes-Man Who Sank the Ship — When Saying Yes to Everything Means Delivering Nothing Read the full Show Notes and search through the world's largest audio library on Agile and Scrum directly on the Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast website: http://bit.ly/SMTP_ShowNotes.   "He was always saying yes. And this led to the scope that grew and grew, until we realized we were not capable of delivering what we committed to." — Maria Skvortsova   Maria returns to her SAP migration experience for this anti-pattern. The team had a team lead acting as product owner — someone technical who saw everything as important. Every new requirement got a "yes." The scope ballooned while the iron triangle held firm: fixed cost, fixed time, no room to breathe. The team reached a breaking point where they had to admit, to each other and to the client, that delivery was impossible. Maria stepped in as what Vasco called "a proxy for the proxy" — she helped the team lead build a user story map on Miro, then facilitated a workshop with the business. Her question was disarmingly simple: "If we don't deliver this by go-live, will your product still function? If yes, it goes to release two." That reframing — not "no" but "yes, later" — gave the client clarity without triggering defensiveness. The team lead learned that business stakeholders aren't the enemy; they just need someone to help them make honest trade-offs. And saying "not now" is infinitely more useful than saying "yes" to everything and delivering nothing on time.   Self-reflection Question: When was the last time you or your product owner said "not now" to a stakeholder — and did it feel like a failure or a strategic decision?   [The Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast Recommends]

Maria Skvortsova: If Your People Feel Safe, You Succeed — Measuring What Matters as a Scrum Master Read the full Show Notes and search through the world's largest audio library on Agile and Scrum directly on the Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast website: http://bit.ly/SMTP_ShowNotes.   "If your people feel safe and comfortable in the environment you built, then you succeed. If not, that's something you should change in your ways of working." — Maria Skvortsova   For Maria, success as a Scrum Master has nothing to do with green reports or velocity charts. She's seen green dashboards masking miserable teams and sky-high velocity hiding terrible quality. Instead, her definition of success centers on one thing: can a developer honestly tell the product owner that a story isn't ready — and not be punished for it? That's psychological safety in action. Maria measures this through healthy conflict — the team's ability to disagree constructively, to challenge each other without fear. She uses the Vacation, Shopper, Prisoner, Explorer retrospective as a gauge: are people showing up as engaged shoppers and explorers, or as reluctant prisoners? She also emphasizes a practice that many Scrum Masters overlook — having regular one-on-ones with every team member. Not just for task alignment, but to understand their cultural background and personal context. Maria works with people from many different cultures and has learned that what feels like disengagement in one culture might be deep respect in another. Her tip: before assuming you understand someone's behavior, invest in learning where they come from. The cultural awareness you build through those conversations will make you a better Scrum Master than any framework ever could.   Self-reflection Question: How do you know whether the people on your team feel safe enough to say "no" or "this isn't ready"? When was the last time you checked? Featured Retrospective Format for the Week: Stinky Fish Maria's favorite retrospective format is the Stinky Fish. The metaphor is simple and vivid: a stinky fish represents the things a team is trying to hide, the elephants in the room that everyone avoids. The longer you hide the fish, the worse it stinks. The exercise asks team members to put their "stinky fish" on the table and admit that something smells. Maria doesn't use this format every sprint — she saves it for when she senses there's something the team is avoiding. She also structures all her retrospectives using the Derby-Larsen model: opening, objective data (burn-downs, defect counts), subjective data, insights, decisions, and closing with a ROTI (Return on Time Invested) vote. For large teams, she uses breakout rooms in pairs — because when you're in a pair, it's impossible not to talk. She also uses Mentimeter for interactive slides, letting people grab their phones, relax, and contribute without the pressure of speaking up in front of 17 people.   [The Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast Recommends]

Maria Skvortsova: Breaking the Factory Mindset — When a 17-Person Scrum Team Treats Development Like an Assembly Line Read the full Show Notes and search through the world's largest audio library on Agile and Scrum directly on the Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast website: http://bit.ly/SMTP_ShowNotes.   "They wait for the story to be pushed to them, then they hand it to QAs and say 'it's not my business anymore.' We have not a Scrum team, but a factory." — Maria Skvortsova   Maria's current challenge is one that many Scrum Masters will recognize: a large distributed team — 17 people, cameras always off, only four months together — that operates like a factory instead of a collaborative unit. In refinement sessions, only the Tech Lead, BAs, and QA speak. Everyone else stays silent. When the sprint starts, developers wait for the Tech Lead to assign stories, work on them in isolation, then toss them over the wall to QA with a "not my problem" attitude. Maria and Vasco explored this challenge through a coaching conversation, identifying information loss as the core issue. Every handoff between developer and tester destroys knowledge and slows the process. Maria had already introduced desk testing — pairing a developer with a QA before deployment to walk through the code on the developer's machine. It worked well in previous teams, but this team keeps forgetting, and in a recent retrospective they even proposed creating a "handover to QA" subtask — the exact opposite of what Maria is trying to build. The experiment that emerged: find a few early adopters willing to try a deeper collaboration model where developers participate in testing and testers participate in design — starting small, measuring what changes, and letting results speak louder than process mandates.   Self-reflection Question: Where are the biggest information loss points in your team's development process, and what experiment could you run this sprint to reduce them?   [The Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast Recommends]

Maria Skvortsova: When Agile Labels Hide Waterfall Reality — A Scrum Master's Wake-Up Call in SAP Migration Read the full Show Notes and search through the world's largest audio library on Agile and Scrum directly on the Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast website: http://bit.ly/SMTP_ShowNotes.   "I realized that even if I like Scrum and Agile, and I think they are really good ways of thinking, some areas cannot adapt them because they are completely different from the mindset and ways of working." — Maria Skvortsova   Maria came to Agile with the fire of a true believer. After a decade as a C++ developer, she'd found something that matched how she thought and felt about building software — something that went beyond controlling budgets and roadmaps. When a boutique SAP consulting company hired her as an Agile coach to transform their entire organization, she was all in. She built what she describes as a "really good" training for senior management, designed to sell them on Agile ways of working. But when she stepped out of the PMO role and into a real SAP migration project as delivery manager, the ground shifted beneath her. The iron triangle — fixed cost, fixed scope, fixed time — ruled everything. Teams ran "sprints" that were really just boxed iterations with no feedback loops, no value delivery, just a march toward a go-live date. Maria realized she was putting Agile labels on a fundamentally waterfall process. The hardest part wasn't the discovery — it was accepting that she needed to redirect her energy to environments where Agile could genuinely take root, rather than forcing it where the mindset simply didn't exist. Her advice: recognize when labels don't match reality as quickly as possible, and have the courage to choose environments that align with how you want to work.   Self-reflection Question: Are you putting Agile labels on processes that are fundamentally waterfall? How quickly would you recognize the mismatch — and what would you do about it?   [The Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast Recommends]

What Servant Leadership Actually MeansWhen I first heard the term “servant leader,” I pictured someone endlessly helpful. Always available. Always saying yes. Smoothing every edge, softening every message, making sure nobody was ever uncomfortable.I was wrong. And for a while, that misunderstanding made me a less effective Scrum Master.Here's the truth I had to learn the hard way: Servant leadership isn't about making everyone comfortable. It's about making everyone capable.How to connect with AgileDad:- [website] ⁠⁠⁠https://www.agiledad.com/⁠⁠⁠- [instagram] ⁠⁠⁠https://www.instagram.com/agile_coach/⁠⁠⁠- [facebook] ⁠⁠⁠https://www.facebook.com/RealAgileDad/⁠⁠⁠- [Linkedin] ⁠⁠⁠https://www.linkedin.com/in/leehenson/

Njegos Ilic: The "Painting by Numbers" Scrum Master vs. The Quiet Leader Who Made the Team Self-Sufficient In this episode, we refer to the concepts of Scrum Master as facilitator and team empowerment. The Bad Scrum Master: The "Painting by Numbers" Approach That Leaves Product Owners Working Alone Read the full Show Notes and search through the world's largest audio library on Agile and Scrum directly on the Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast website: http://bit.ly/SMTP_ShowNotes.   "You basically feel totally alone because you are trying to deliver value as a team, but if nobody asks anything and nobody challenges anything, you end up defining everything yourself." - Njegos Ilic   Njegos describes the worst Scrum Master anti-pattern he's witnessed: the "painting by numbers" Scrum Master who runs every ceremony by the book — dailies, refinements, plannings, retros, reviews — but without understanding the purpose behind any of them. The meetings become a reporting cycle: "What did you do yesterday?" with no interaction, no challenging, no real engagement. From the product owner's perspective, this is devastating. Njegos describes feeling completely alone — trying to deliver value as a team while nobody engages, nobody asks questions, nobody pushes back on assumptions. The downstream effect is predictable: gaps that could have been caught early with a single conversation only surface during development or after deployment. Worse, the lack of engagement creates doubt and overthinking — the product owner starts over-defining requirements because there's no feedback loop, which reinforces the very passivity that caused the problem.   Self-reflection Question: Are the ceremonies on your team creating genuine engagement and learning — or have they become a reporting cycle that nobody actually needs? The Great Scrum Master: The Quiet, Impactful Leader Who Made the Team Self-Sufficient Read the full Show Notes and search through the world's largest audio library on Agile and Scrum directly on the Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast website: http://bit.ly/SMTP_ShowNotes.   "The best Scrum Masters I worked with were invisible — they knew always when to speak, they sensed the pulse of the team, and they weren't afraid to jump in when needed." - Njegos Ilic   The best Scrum Masters Njegos has worked with share a common trait: they were almost invisible. They didn't dominate meetings or insert themselves where they weren't needed. But they were always present — sensing the team's pulse, knowing when to step in, unafraid to say "we're out of time, let's take this offline." They were knowledgeable about the product, which earned them genuine respect from developers. And perhaps most powerfully, they delegated facilitation itself. Njegos shares an example where a Scrum Master introduced a round-robin system: when new developers joined the team, everyone took turns facilitating meetings — planning, retros, dailies. This wasn't just delegation for efficiency; it was empowerment by design. Team members who facilitated a retrospective suddenly understood how hard it is to lead one. That empathy changed how they participated when someone else was facilitating. The Scrum Master remained the guide, but the team grew its own capacity to self-organize.   Self-reflection Question: If your Scrum Master disappeared tomorrow, would your team know how to facilitate its own ceremonies — and if not, what does that say about how the role is being used?   [The Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast Recommends]

Njegos Ilic: Why Measuring Your Product Bets Is the Key to Product Owner Success Read the full Show Notes and search through the world's largest audio library on Agile and Scrum directly on the Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast website: http://bit.ly/SMTP_ShowNotes.   "If you cannot measure what you build, you will just be depending on who is screaming the loudest and using your gut feeling — which is not a good thing long term." - Njegos Ilic   Njegos defines product owner success through three pillars: the ability to measure product bets, deep knowledge of the industry and product, and the humility to admit mistakes and be challenged. The measurement piece is central — without it, he argues, you're flying blind, making decisions based on opinions rather than evidence, reacting to whoever screams loudest rather than what the data shows. But Njegos is honest that not every environment makes measurement easy. Some companies lack the tooling, the culture, or the historical infrastructure to set up proper analytics. In those situations, he turns to user interviews as the next best thing — getting direct feedback from users, even though he acknowledges that opinions are still limited without data to fact-check them against. His most powerful suggestion: invite the whole team to user interviews, not just the product trio. When developers hear directly from users, they connect to real-world problems, and conversations during refinements become richer and more grounded.   In this episode, we refer to The Mom Test by Rob Fitzpatrick and Shift: From Product to People by Michael Dougherty and Pete Oliver-Kruger.   Self-reflection Question: How do you currently measure whether the features you shipped actually delivered the value you expected — and if you can't measure it, what's your fallback? Featured Retrospective Format for the Week: Start With a Relaxing Exercise Njegos doesn't advocate for a specific retrospective template — and that's the point. From his product owner perspective, he values retrospectives that begin with a relaxing, informal exercise to set the tone. Not everything needs to feel like business as usual. This casual opening allows people to connect as humans first, which opens them up to think differently about what they learned during the sprint. Njegos is candid about the reality: some teams love icebreakers, while others find them childish and just want to get to the point. His advice is to sense the pulse of the team and adapt. The format matters less than whether it creates an environment where people can be honest about what went well, what didn't, and what to improve. A Scrum Master who reads the team's vibe and adjusts accordingly — that's what makes the difference.   [The Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast Recommends]

Njegos Ilic: How a Miro Board Experiment Changed the Way His Team Understood the Big Picture Read the full Show Notes and search through the world's largest audio library on Agile and Scrum directly on the Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast website: http://bit.ly/SMTP_ShowNotes.   "Every feature is a product bet. I would call this a process bet — just try to see what works best for you." - Njegos Ilic   Njegos shares a change story from his time working with a tech lead who had previously been a Scrum Master — a partnership that made all the difference. Together, they introduced a simple but powerful change: visualizing the team's work on a Miro board instead of relying on a standard ticket board with cards and status columns. They mapped out concepts, connected ticket numbers to a visual representation of how different pieces of work fit together, and used this board during dailies and refinements to track progress in context. The change wasn't imposed top-down — Njegos and his tech lead simply said, "Give us one sprint to try this. If it doesn't work, we drop it." The result was immediate: dailies became more engaging, the team could see how their individual work connected to the bigger picture, and Njegos found it much easier to track progress as a visual thinker. His advice for Scrum Masters and product owners who want to introduce something similar is refreshingly simple — frame it as a "process bet," just like you'd frame a product bet. Try it, measure what happens, and if it doesn't work, drop it and try something else. The willingness to experiment with your own process is a prerequisite for experimenting with the product itself.   Self-reflection Question: What "process bet" has your team been avoiding — and what would it take to just try it for one sprint?   [The Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast Recommends]

Retrospectives are supposed to help teams improve, but for many teams they slowly become rushed, repetitive, or skipped altogether. In this episode, Brian Milner and Cort Sharp unpack why retrospectives lose their value and what Scrum Masters and leaders can do to make them useful again.   Overview When a team stops engaging in retrospectives, it is usually a symptom of something deeper. Sometimes the format has become stale. Sometimes the team no longer feels safe being honest. And sometimes the biggest issue is that retrospectives create plenty of discussion but very little meaningful change. In this conversation, Brian and Cort explore the most common reasons retrospectives begin to fail and how teams can rebuild trust in the process. They discuss the importance of psychological safety, why teams should focus on fewer actions instead of trying to fix everything at once, and how Scrum Masters can better tailor retrospectives to the personalities and working styles of their teams. They also share practical ideas for making retrospectives more engaging, more actionable, and more valuable over time.   References and resources mentioned in the show: Cort Sharp Amy Edmonson, Psychological Safety #139: The Retrospective Reset with Cort Sharp #141: Cooking Up a Killer Retrospective with Brian Milner The Empirical Retrospective Approach by Mike Cohn Subscribe to the Agile Mentors Podcast   Want to get involved? This show is designed for you, and we'd love your input. Enjoyed what you heard today? Please leave a rating and a review. It really helps, and we read every single one. Got an Agile subject you'd like us to discuss or a question that needs an answer? Share your thoughts with us at podcast@mountaingoatsoftware.com This episode's presenters are: Brian Milner is a Certified Scrum Trainer®, Certified Scrum Professional®, Certified ScrumMaster®, and Certified Scrum Product Owner®, and host of the Agile Mentors Podcast training at Mountain Goat Software. He's passionate about making a difference in people's day-to-day work, influenced by his own experience of transitioning to Scrum and seeing improvements in work/life balance, honesty, respect, and the quality of work. Cort Sharp is the Scrum Master of the producing team and the Agile Mentors Community Manager. In addition to his love for Agile, Cort is also a serious swimmer and has been coaching swimmers for five years.

Njegos Ilic: Why the Product Trio Breaks the Hand-Off Mentality That Kills Team Engagement Read the full Show Notes and search through the world's largest audio library on Agile and Scrum directly on the Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast website: http://bit.ly/SMTP_ShowNotes.   "I can't change people, but I can definitely involve them." - Njegos Ilic   Njegos describes a pattern he's encountered multiple times as a product owner: teams where engagement is almost nonexistent. He walks into a refinement session, presents ideas, asks for feedback — and gets crickets. Nobody pushes back, nobody asks questions, nobody challenges the assumptions. The result is a product owner working in isolation, defining everything alone, only to discover gaps during development that could have been caught early with a single conversation. Njegos is honest about the limits of what any one person can do — you can't change people's personalities, and expecting a Scrum Master to do so is unrealistic. But what you can do is involve people. His approach when joining a new team: don't come in announcing how things will work. Instead, learn how the team already works, meet them where they are, and then find ways to fit new concepts into their existing rhythm. For the non-negotiable things — the red lines — he's precise, open, and always provides an alternative rather than just pushing his way.   In this segment, we talk about Discovery and Delivery and the Product Trio concept.   Self-reflection Question: When you join a team meeting and get silence instead of feedback, do you assume agreement — or do you treat it as a signal that something deeper needs to change? Featured Book of the Week: Inspired by Marty Cagan Njegos recommends Inspired by Marty Cagan as the book that most shaped his approach to product ownership. He highlights the entire SVPG series — including Empowered and Transformed (available as the Product is Hard SVPG Box Set) — but points to the Product Trio concept as especially powerful. As Njegos puts it, the Product Trio — bringing together a product manager, a tech lead, and a designer — removes the hand-off mentality where each discipline works in isolation. Instead of the product owner defining everything alone and handing it to the team, the trio shapes problems together during discovery, so that by the time work reaches the team, there's shared understanding of why they're building something, not just what to build.   [The Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast Recommends]

Christian Thordal: The Jazz Duo Effect and The Absent PO — Two Sides of Agile Product Ownership The Great Product Owner: Clarity, Accountability, and a Partnership That Fills in the Blanks Read the full Show Notes and search through the world's largest audio library on Agile and Scrum directly on the Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast website: http://bit.ly/SMTP_ShowNotes.   "We kind of filled in the blanks for each other, and it felt very natural — it's grown organically into this partnership where we're extremely aligned on how we see and do things." - Christian Thordal   Christian describes his best Product Owner as someone he currently works with — a person who combines deep product clarity with genuine leadership. This PO is fully accountable for the backlog, sets clear expectations toward the teams, and isn't afraid to push them. What makes this PO stand out is how they use reporting as a communication tool: alongside the backlog, they proactively communicate to the product leader whether things are within or outside scope, always with a plan ready. Christian and this PO hold weekly follow-ups to discuss the team, the backlog, and the product direction. Over time, their alignment has become so strong that during facilitation sessions they naturally fill in blanks for each other — one picks up where the other leaves off. Vasco compared it to a jazz duo, where each musician picks up on the other's leads in real time. This kind of organic partnership in leadership direction reflects positively on the entire team, creating a sense of coherence and momentum that everyone can feel.   Self-reflection Question: How aligned are you with your Product Owner on leadership direction, and what would it take to build the kind of partnership where you naturally fill in the blanks for each other? The Bad Product Owner: When the PO Disappears and the Scrum Master Becomes the Glue Read the full Show Notes and search through the world's largest audio library on Agile and Scrum directly on the Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast website: http://bit.ly/SMTP_ShowNotes.   "You can inspire, you can motivate, but you can't really do the work for them." - Christian Thordal   Christian shares an experience from a larger logistics company in Denmark where the Product Owner was a great, likable person — but didn't understand the role. The backlog was high-level, consisting primarily of Epics with no acceptance criteria. Then the warning signs started: the PO became increasingly hard to get a hold of, started canceling refinement meetings (sometimes on the same day), began working more from home, and became physically more distant from the team. Christian and the team were left to navigate on their own, breaking down epics into stories and tasks without knowing if they were building the right product. Christian tried setting up weekly one-hour sessions to help the PO work through the backlog, but the fundamental problem remained — you cannot do the PO's work for them. Eventually, Christian found himself filling in for the PO, which is itself an anti-pattern: the Scrum Master becoming the glue that holds the product together. The symptoms to watch for are clear: a PO who starts missing meetings, backlog items that remain unrefined, a PO who becomes physically or remotely distant, and — the biggest red flag — a Scrum Master who feels compelled to step in and do the PO's job.   Self-reflection Question: Are there signs that your Product Owner is drifting away from the team, and have you caught yourself filling in gaps that aren't yours to fill?   [The Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast Recommends]

Christian Thordal: Structure Creates Freedom, How an Agile Coach Measures Success by Becoming Less Needed Read the full Show Notes and search through the world's largest audio library on Agile and Scrum directly on the Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast website: http://bit.ly/SMTP_ShowNotes.   "The less I shine and the more the team shines, the better I perform." - Christian Thordal   Christian shares how his definition of success has fundamentally shifted over the years. Early in his career, the question was "How can I shine?" Today, it is the opposite — success means becoming invisible. For Christian, a high-performing Scrum Master builds teams that no longer depend on them, much like raising a child to become a functional adult by eighteen. They can always call dad for coaching or to borrow money, but they can stand on their own. He illustrates this with a team he moved from what he calls "cowboy loose Kanban" to an adapted Scrum framework. The structure gave the team freedom: he can now miss dailies and planning sessions, and the team still produces a solid plan, sprint backlog, and sprint goal. He drops by to give pointers and encourage good behaviors. Christian also highlights the importance of the Scrum Master and Product Owner partnership — "the mom and dad of the team" — and how building predictability and flow matters more than heroics. A key tactical insight: he created a one-pager roadmap for his domain leader showing issues, plans, milestones, and metrics. This simple artifact gave leadership the comfort that things were under control, buying Christian the autonomy to do his best work. This proved critical when his team was decimated by departures in late 2025 — he hired new people, stabilized the group, and got them delivering again.   Self-reflection Question: What would it look like if your team could run a full sprint cycle without you present — and what is stopping that from happening today? Featured Retrospective Format for the Week: The Four-Box Retrospective Christian shares a retrospective format he calls the Four-Box Retrospective — a structured, pragmatic approach that resonates especially well with engineer-minded teams. The session begins with a team check-in to get the vibe in the room. Next, the team reviews last week's agreements: who was accountable, and are those items still alive or handled? Anything still alive moves forward automatically, ensuring nothing falls through the cracks. Then comes the core mechanic: topic creation divided into four boxes — Tech (tools and tech stacks), Team (issues within the team), Outside (external dependencies and blockers), and Parking Lot (everything else). Presenters explain their topics briefly to give context, and the group uses dot voting to surface the most pressing issues. Discussion follows, with clear accountability assignments and action items written down. The pre-grouping into four boxes saves significant time by giving topics a natural home before discussion begins. Named owners for every action item create real progress between retrospectives. Christian values this format because it is grounded in actual operational problems — people can see the direct application of every conversation, which keeps engagement high and outcomes tangible.   [The Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast Recommends]

Too many teams try to “do Agile” by adding layers of process before they understand the problem they're trying to solve. In this episode, Brian Milner and Cort Sharp discuss how to start Agile simply, avoid unnecessary complexity, and build practices that actually fit your team.   Overview When organizations first adopt Agile, they often make the same mistake: they start with frameworks, terminology, and process layers instead of focusing on visibility, feedback, and learning. The result is a system that feels heavy before it ever becomes useful. In this episode, Brian Milner and Cort Sharp explore a more practical approach to getting started with Agile. They discuss why teams should focus on foundational concepts like transparency, short feedback loops, and clear priorities before worrying about scaling frameworks or advanced practices. Brian and Cort also share the common “drag factors” that slow Agile adoption down, including process overload, coordination complexity, and measuring the wrong outcomes. If your team is trying to become more Agile without creating more bureaucracy, this episode offers a practical starting point.   References and resources mentioned in the show:   Cort Sharp Introducing An Agile Process to an Organization by Mike Cohn + Doris Ford Relationship between Definition of Done and Conditions of Satisfaction by Mike Cohn Why Agile Teams Put So Much Emphasis on Being Done Each Iteration by Mike Cohn Subscribe to the Agile Mentors Podcast    Want to get involved? This show is designed for you, and we'd love your input.   Enjoyed what you heard today? Please leave a rating and a review. It really helps, and we read every single one.   Got an Agile subject you'd like us to discuss or a question that needs an answer? Share your thoughts with us at podcast@mountaingoatsoftware.com This episode's presenters are: Brian Milner is a Certified Scrum Trainer®, Certified Scrum Professional®, Certified ScrumMaster®, and Certified Scrum Product Owner®, and host of the Agile Mentors Podcast training at Mountain Goat Software. He's passionate about making a difference in people's day-to-day work, influenced by his own experience of transitioning to Scrum and seeing improvements in work/life balance, honesty, respect, and the quality of work.  Cort Sharp is the Scrum Master of the producing team and the Agile Mentors Community Manager. In addition to his love for Agile, Cort is also a serious swimmer and has been coaching swimmers for five years.

Peter Merel: Leadership as a Service — Why Scrum Masters Should Work Themselves Out of a Job and How Quality Circles Make Learning Flow Read the full Show Notes and search through the world's largest audio library on Agile and Scrum directly on the Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast website: http://bit.ly/SMTP_ShowNotes.   "A Scrum Master is a self-defeating role. If you have worked yourself out of a job, then you've succeeded." - Peter Merel   Peter Merel challenges the very notion of the Scrum Master as a permanent organizational role. He argues that calling someone a "master" makes everyone else a servant — the opposite of what agile teams need. Instead, Peter advocates for leadership as a service, where every team member provides leadership to their team and every member of a swarm provides leadership to their swarm. He points to the Haudenosaunee Confederacy — the successful direct democratic republic that existed in North America before the USA, and which influenced the American founding fathers — as a model for distributed leadership. The protocol is simple enough to apply universally, regardless of organizational structure. Peter's practical approach to success measurement is equally compelling: build a thin steel thread of alignment, prove it works in 8 to 12 weeks, then split it and backfill with the most progressive people in the organization. He describes growing a group of 300 in just 9 months using this approach. The key insight is that coaches should not think of themselves as change agents, but rather as people who transform change participants into change leaders. Once a team can self-organize without you, your job is to move on to the next challenge — and that's what success looks like.   In this episode, we refer to the concept of leadership as a service and the XScale Alliance.   Self-reflection Question: If you stepped away from your team tomorrow, could they self-organize effectively — and if not, what's the one thing you could teach them this week that would bring them closer to not needing you? Featured Retrospective Format for the Week: Quality Circles Peter Merel recommends quality circles as a cross-team retrospective format drawn from the Toyota Production System. The concept is simple but powerful: take three teams of six people and break them into six quality circles of three — one person from each team in each circle. These circles meet regularly for 10 to 30 minutes, ideally before team planning sessions, to share problems, ideas, and ways they can help each other. The magic of three people is that while one person explains, another listens, and the third is already thinking about where the conversation goes next — creating what Peter calls "a beautiful hum." Each circle brings two kinds of ideas back to their team: proposals for work that would benefit the teams as a whole, and treaties — working agreements between teams. The teams remain autonomous and can decide how to respond. Peter emphasizes that this approach scales naturally — representatives from groups of teams can form quality circles at higher levels, keeping face-to-face communication alive across entire organizations. As Peter puts it, "Learnings flow across the organization — and that's more valuable than anything you can come up with in a retrospective by yourself."   [The Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast Recommends]

Peter Merel: When Telling a Manager "You Don't Have a Role" Backfires — A Lesson in Agile Coaching Humility Read the full Show Notes and search through the world's largest audio library on Agile and Scrum directly on the Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast website: http://bit.ly/SMTP_ShowNotes.   "A failure is not a failure. A failure is just the first step." - Peter Merel   Peter Merel became a Scrum Master by stealth — long before the title existed. Credited in Kent Beck's first XP book and present at the first agile conference, Peter was practicing lightweight processes at Hewlett Packard in the late 1990s. When he took a role at GMAC, the residential finance arm of General Motors, he brought XP practices with him and found early success. After six months of strong results, the project manager, Mike Alakom, sat Peter down and asked the most dangerous management question: "What do I do?" Peter gave what he now calls the stupidest answer possible — "You don't really have a role in this process." The next day, Mike called an all-hands meeting and calmly maneuvered Peter into crediting the entire way of working as Mike's idea. Peter stayed on for another six months, but at arm's length. In hindsight, Peter recognizes Mike did exactly what he should have done. The second failure came at Commonwealth Bank of Australia, where Peter was brought in to coach agile but was actually being set up to fail — a ripcord the organization could pull when it wasn't ready for change. The delivery manager, Des Webster, told Peter directly: "You were set up to fail." Peter walked away, thinking he'd never return. But six years later, every person he had coached had moved up in the organization, and Peter came back as principal coach for 50,000 people. The CIO declared Agile one of the bank's five pillars. Just because you hit the wall doesn't mean it's the end — it might be the beginning.   Self-reflection Question: When was the last time you failed at introducing change, and have you considered that the seeds you planted might still be growing in ways you can't yet see?   [The Scrum Master Toolbox Podcast Recommends]

BONUS: Why Your Agile Transformation Keeps Snapping Back — And What Systems Thinking Says About It Natalia Curusi co-authored a book that doesn't tell you what agile should look like — it tells you what actually happens when you try to transform an organization. Friday-night deployments, zombie teams going through the motions, transformations that met a wall of silence. In this episode, we unpack the real lessons from the front lines: how personal values drive the shift to agile, why some teams have all the ceremonies but none of the substance, and what systems thinking reveals about why transformations fail — or snap back. When Your Values Don't Match Your Ways of Working "I felt like there is a mismatch in my values, my moral values and principles, and customer-centric orientation. So when I found out about Agile around 2010, I understood — okay, this is the answer. Now I have the answer how I can map my moral values and principles with software delivery."   Natalia's journey to agile didn't start with a methodology — it started with a gut feeling that something was wrong. Working in large corporations in the early 2000s with fixed-scope contracts, late deployments, and scripts running directly in production, she sensed a disconnect between how work was done and how it should be done. When she moved to a smaller company around 2010 and experienced transparency, collaboration, and the freedom to ask any question without fear, she realized this was the agile mindset — even before she knew the term. The key insight: agile isn't something you adopt, it's something that aligns with values you may already hold. That alignment between personal principles and ways of working is what makes the difference between going through the motions and genuinely transforming how a team operates. Don't Be an Agile Zombie "The first thing I observe — if I go to some of the ceremonies and I see that stand-up becomes like a status meeting, and everybody is reporting to somebody. People are afraid to say some of the things, afraid to escalate risks or assumptions."   One of the strongest chapters in the book is titled "Don't Be an Agile Zombie." Natalia describes teams that have all the boards, all the roles, all the right meeting cadences — but nothing is actually changing. The Scrum Master becomes a secretary. The Product Owner is a proxy afraid to make decisions. The tell-tale signs? Fear and formality. When people report upward instead of collaborating sideways, when risks go unspoken because the environment punishes transparency, that's a watermelon project — green on the outside, red on the inside. Natalia's approach starts with observing the tone and dynamics in ceremonies. If the stand-up feels like a status report and not a coordination meeting, something deeper is broken. And her advice is direct: if an organization is delivering waterfall and happy with the predictability and value, that's fine — just call it what it is. Don't put lipstick on a pig. As Rebecca Homkes discussed on this podcast, the key is to communicate the truth with care, but communicate it nonetheless. Task-Driven vs. Value-Driven: The Real Spectrum "It's not right to say that you are agile if you are not. Just name the things how they are — name the things using the right word."   Rather than the old waterfall-vs-agile binary, a more useful lens is the spectrum between task-driven and value-driven product development. On the task-driven side, somebody creates the list of tasks — requirements, architecture document, design document — and a project manager distributes them. Teams execute but aren't asked to be creative or adaptable. On the value-driven side, what matters is the impact of what teams build. Value is discovered through the dynamic interaction of functionality with customers — it can't be predetermined. Most organizations sit somewhere on this spectrum, and many are slowly moving toward the value-driven end even if they don't call it agile. The practical takeaway: transformation should be tailored to where an organization actually is, not where a framework says it should be. The book argues for a pragmatic, hybrid approach rather than evangelical purity. Systems Thinking: Why Transformations Snap Back "We did a big agile transformation — five years of real transformation. Then the company was bought, merged with a bigger payment provider. And now they are working with SAFe. And that's the end of the story."   In the later part of the book, Natalia and her co-author move into systems thinking — Cynefin, the Iceberg Model, causal loop diagrams. Many agile practitioners stop before they get here because it feels academic. But Natalia argues it's essential, and she illustrates why with a real example: a payment company that went through five years of successful agile transformation using LeSS, only to be acquired by a larger organization that pushed SAFe — and the transformation snapped back. This is the basin of attraction concept: a system has to pass through a point of genuine disruption before it can settle into a new stable state. Without that, it returns to where it was. For practitioners looking to get started with systems thinking, Natalia recommends The Fifth Discipline by Peter Senge and learning to build causal loop diagrams — a practical tool that creates productive conversations about how organizational dynamics actually work. The Post-Agile Era: Beyond Labels "It's like comparing apples and orchestras. You cannot compare agile and AI — they are completely different things. Agile is not enough, but it's also not dead."   Natalia addresses the "Agile is dead" debate head-on. Her argument: comparing agile to AI is a category error. An apple cannot play an orchestra, and an orchestra cannot replace an apple — they serve entirely different purposes. AI can handle a significant portion of day-to-day tasks, but it lacks common sense, empathy, and the ability to read a room. Rather than declaring agile dead, Natalia sees a post-agile era — not one where agile disappears, but where we move beyond the label wars. The trends that matter aren't about whether agile is popular; they're about collaboration, adaptability, and understanding how teams and organizations actually work. We can finally talk about what matters in our industry without being pressured to label it. About Natalia Curusi Natalia Curusi is an Agile Coach at Endava with over 20 years in software delivery, specializing in agile transformations, delivery optimization, and systems thinking. She leads Asia Pacific initiatives driving business agility. She is co-author of From Resistance to Resilience: Practical Agile Lessons for Transformation.   You can link with Natalia Curusi on LinkedIn and visit her website at nataliacurusi.com. You can also join the Agile Continuum community on LinkedIn.

BONUS: Hard Hats and Standups — Why the Construction Industry Is Going Agile at GAS26 Felipe Engineer-Manriquez is one of the co-hosts of the Agile in Construction track at the Global Agile Summit 2026. In this preview episode, he and Vasco talk about why Agile belongs on the construction site, what the track's speakers discovered when they stopped following the plan, and why software people should pay close attention to an industry that builds hospitals, not apps. Construction Is 20 Years Behind — And That's the Opportunity "People don't realize that those ideas absolutely work in other industries. Agile's been successfully applied everywhere, and I think where it gets the least amount of publicity is in the construction sector."   When most people hear "Agile," they think standups in a tech office, not concrete and rebar. Felipe wants to change that. Construction, he says, is always about 20 years behind whatever process or technology the rest of the world adopts — a "very safe stock of keeping tradition." That gap is exactly what makes this track valuable. Agile is alive and growing in construction, and the translation turns out to be simpler than you'd expect. Most of what needs to change isn't the framework — it's the vocabulary. The sessions in this track show how practitioners made that jump with surprisingly small tweaks. The Speakers Don't Know How Good They Are "Half the speakers that I asked were like, 'what, me? Do I have a story to share?' I was like, yeah, you have this really amazing... people just don't realize how awesome they are."   One of the things that struck Felipe while assembling the track was how humble the speakers are. People who have transformed how their companies deliver work — including the keynote speaker, Brian, whose organization celebrated 10 years and saw dramatic before-and-after results — genuinely didn't think their stories were remarkable. They grew up in an industry with 100 years of project management tradition, where PMI-style thinking is the water they swim in. They don't see how different things look from the outside. Some of these practitioners couldn't even work across projects before adopting Agile — and now they're doing it routinely. That capacity shift alone is a data point worth paying attention to. Stop Following the Plan — Start Responding to Change "It's just ground into you, that thou shalt follow a plan. But in reality... they have to do heroic things to make those plans happen. Because the plans are just wrong."   Felipe zeroed in on the Agile value of responding to change over following a plan as the single biggest shift his speakers experienced. In construction, plan adherence is gospel — you follow the schedule, period. But in practice, teams were performing heroics just to make flawed plans appear to work. As speakers adopted Agile, they stopped forcing broken plans and started adapting. Felipe gives a nod to #NoEstimates — calling Vasco "the granddaddy of #NoEstimates" — as part of the same insight: the plans are wrong, and the sooner you accept that, the sooner you can respond to what's actually happening. The second pattern was equally powerful: for the first time, construction workers started thinking about who actually uses what they build. You'd think building a school or hospital makes the end user obvious, but Felipe says people in the industry can work for years and never once consider who receives their work. Agile forced that question, and the answers changed how they prioritize. What Software People Should Steal From Construction "Inside of every process are people. Everyone faces resistance to change... when I stopped trying to teach people, and I started inviting people, things changed."   Here's the cross-industry lesson Felipe wants software practitioners to hear: resistance to change is universal, and the breakthrough is the same everywhere. Every speaker in the track had a moment where they learned something new and didn't want to go back to the old way. That's the same moment every Scrum Master, product owner, and developer has lived through. The universal tactic that worked? Showing rather than telling. Case study after case study revealed that the real breakthroughs came not from training sessions or slide decks, but from demonstrating results and inviting people in. Stop teaching, start inviting — that's a principle that works whether you're pouring concrete or shipping code. Come Monday, You'll Ask Better Questions "The best thing you're gonna do on Monday after the summit is you're gonna start to ask really intelligent questions. That is gonna be priceless. That's something that AI doesn't even do for people."   Felipe's take on what attendees will walk away with isn't a new framework or a certification. It's a shift in the questions they ask. Twenty years into practicing Lean Construction, Agile, and Scrum, Felipe says asking better questions is the one thing that has stuck with him the entire time. Better questions melt away resistance, open up new perspectives, and make new ways of working accessible. The ideas in the track are, in his words, "not terribly complicated — they're actually quite simple, and I would even say elegant." And the speakers are approachable — Felipe personally vouches that every speaker in his track answers emails. There will also be live Q&A sessions during the summit for direct interaction. When Your AI Agent Tells You to Build a Website, You Listen "My chief orchestrator said, you should have your own website. So felipe.engineer was built."   In a delightful closing moment, Felipe shared that his personal website at felipe.engineer was built by his AI agent. Not suggested and then hand-coded — fully built, complete with a style guide the agent had strategically created two weeks earlier. Felipe jokes that the AI was setting him up: first planting the seed that he needed a style guide, then recommending it be applied to a brand-new personal site. Felipe also has a session in the track about building an AI bot for construction sites — another reason to check out the full lineup at globalagilesummit.com. About Felipe Engineer-Manriquez Felipe Engineer-Manriquez is a best-selling author, international speaker, and host of The EBFC Show. A force in Lean and Agile, he helps teams build faster with less effort. Felipe trains and coaches changemakers worldwide — and wrote Construction Scrum to make work easier, better, and faster for everyone.   You can link with Felipe Engineer-Manriquez on LinkedIn.   You can also find Felipe at thefelipe.bio.link, check out The EBFC Show podcast, and join the EBFC Scrum Community of Practice.

BONUS: Why the People Track Exists — And What It Will Help You See at GAS26 The Global Agile Summit kicks off on May 4th, and the People track is one of the most loaded lineups this year. In this episode, track co-hosts Pete Oliver-Krueger and Alina Thapliyal share the story behind the track, the sessions they're most excited about, and why — in a world increasingly focused on technology and AI — the people dimension is more critical than ever. The Story Behind the People Track "Every transformation still comes down to how people feel, how they communicate, how they work with each other, how decisions are made, and how leaders can create a space and conditions for them to thrive."   The People track isn't new to the Global Agile Summit — it's been part of the event for several years, sometimes combined with the Product track. But this year, the volume and quality of submissions made it clear that the topic deserves its own dedicated space. Alina frames it in terms of the VUCA world we operate in: volatility, uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguity make the people dimension more important, not less. Pete picks up the thread with a sharper edge — as AI and technology increasingly dominate the conversation, it's easy to lose sight of the people creating, designing, using, and selling the products. That tension is exactly why he wrote Shift: From Product to People with his co-author Michael. The book exists to pull practitioners out of product-as-a-thing thinking and into product-as-people thinking. Product as a Thing vs. Product as People "When we lose sight of the people around the product is when things start to suffer."   When Pete reviewed the track submissions, he noticed a telling pattern — a divergence that confirmed the track's reason for existing. Many submissions talked about product as an artifact, focused on deliverables and outcomes, with no connection to the humans involved. Then there was a second group that immediately saw themselves in the People track. Pete explains the dynamic: we all start by caring about people and solving problems, but at some point we pick a solution and the work of getting it done becomes all-consuming. The task becomes the goal and the people become objects. Unless we consciously leave space to think about relationships and human dynamics, we drift into laser focus on things. The sessions in this track are designed to be the antidote. Marcus Bullock's Keynote — A People-First Success Story "It's so inspiring to just listen to it and think that I can also do it. We can give people a second chance. We can focus on what's good and increase the good, rather than focus on what's bad."   Both Alina and Pete highlighted Marcus Bullock's keynote as a must-watch. Marcus, CEO of Flikshop, started from a deeply difficult place and built his way to leading a business and empowering others. What makes his story stand out isn't the arc from adversity to success — it's the honesty. Pete, who has known Marcus for over 15 years, points out that Marcus's story includes genuine ups and downs, and his people-first approach is what helped him weather all of them. Alina was struck by the energy Marcus brings and his focus on amplifying what's good in people rather than minimizing what's bad. It's a message that resonates whether you lead a team of five or an organization of five thousand. Usability Theater — The Courage to Shut Up and Listen "Take a product, give it to a customer, and don't say anything. Just let the customer try it, let the customer experience the product. We need to have the courage to shut up."   Alina's second highlight was the session on usability theater, where the core idea is deceptively simple: put your product in front of a customer and resist the urge to explain anything. No "look what we did here," no guided tour. Just observe how people actually interact with what you've built. It takes real courage, Alina says, because our instinct is to showcase and defend our work. But the insights you gain from silence and observation are worth far more than the comfort of narration. This is one of those sessions that sounds simple but could change how you run your next product review or demo. Agency — Breaking the Permission Loop "There is a necessity to understand ourselves and have some of this confidence, but that's true for everybody, even our leaders. They may be stuck in permission loops with their own bosses."   Tara Scott's session on agency and breaking the permission loop touched a nerve for both hosts. Alina shared that in companies she's worked for, drawn-out decision processes wasted resources and drove people to leave. Tara's session tackles how to empower people to actually make decisions. Pete adds a crucial nuance: the permission loop isn't just a top-down problem. Leaders are stuck in their own permission loops too. Everyone in the chain faces the same challenge, and the solution can't be found in a vacuum — it requires understanding where each person is coming from and building flexibility across the team and organization. If this topic hits close to home, Tara is also doing a live Q&A during the summit. Neurodiversity, Jeff Patton, and the Full Lineup "Every time I have a conversation with Jeff Patton, it just goes in all kinds of directions, and I have so much fun."   Pete flagged two more sessions worth watching. The neurodiversity session with Anita promises to open up a topic that deserves more airtime in the agile community — how different minds experience and contribute to team dynamics. And Jeff Patton, whose conversations with Pete apparently never follow a straight line, brings his signature blend of product thinking and people awareness. The full track covers a wide range: trust, leadership, inclusion, decision-making, neurodiversity. As Alina puts it, these topics are universal — they're about human behavior, and that's valuable in any field where you work with people. A New Lens for Monday Morning "I think people can take away from the track the ability to see other dynamics in their workplace that maybe they currently aren't spending a lot of time paying attention to, or didn't even realize were there."   When asked what attendees will walk away with, both Alina and Pete landed on the same metaphor: a new lens. Alina described it as a better understanding of how human dynamics shape culture and performance, paired with practical tips that can be applied immediately — no theory, just real-life stories from real practitioners. Pete took the metaphor further, comparing it to putting on night vision goggles. After watching these sessions, you'll start noticing dynamics you'd been walking past every day — relationship patterns, permission loops, communication gaps. And with that new visibility comes influence. You'll realize you have more ability to shape your environment than you thought, simply because you can now see what was always there. About Pete Oliver-Krueger Pete Oliver-Krueger is an Executive Coach with the Library of Agile, and co-author of the book "Shift: From Product to People", a novel that tells the complex story of how leading "people-first" is required to solve tomorrow's biggest problems.   You can link with Pete Oliver-Krueger on LinkedIn, and visit Pete OK's website at https://www.shiftingpeople.com/. About Alina Thapliyal Alina Thapliyal is the Scrum Master for a team within the public sector. Her aspiration is to become an agile coach. She grew up in Romania and has been living in Germany for 13 years. She loves jogging, reading and actively listening to people's life stories.   You can link with Alina Thapliyal on LinkedIn.