Podcasts about Correctness

In this week's Beyond Sunday, Josh is joined by Paxton, Michael, and the legendary Paul Goodman—one of New Work's original worship culture builders and long-time elder. The team dives into an unforgettable round of "Bible or Breakup Ballad?"—a lyric guessing game that blurs the line between Song of Solomon and Shawn Mendes, complete with coffee wagers and surprise reveals. Their hilarious and heartfelt reflections remind us just how moving, misunderstood, and musically rich the Bible can be. Then, the focus shifts to Paxton's message from the “Before You Go” series, walking through the "Four C's" that build our confidence in Scripture's truth: Continuity, Content, Consistency, and Correctness. The conversation gets real about wrestling with doubt, bad theology we may have inherited, and the Bible's prophetic power. With insightful stats on prophecy fulfillment, personal stories of rediscovery, and Paul's encouragement about revival among the youth, this episode is both intellectually stirring and spiritually uplifting.  

(07:40) Brought to you by Swimm.io.⁠⁠⁠⁠Start modernizing your mainframe faster with Swimm.Understand the what, why, and how of your mainframe code.Use AI to uncover critical code insights for seamless migration, refactoring, or system replacement.What if everything you've been taught about software architecture is fundamentally at odds with how the real world works?Dive into my conversation with Barry O'Reilly, a veteran architect and former Chief Architect at Microsoft, as we explore a radical rethinking of software architecture that embraces uncertainty and complexity. Discover how to design systems that survive in an ever-changing world.Key topics discussed:The Architect's Paradox: Why rigid logic fails when applied to human systems and business complexity.The Failures of Traditional Architecture: Why requirements engineering and rigid models often fall short.Residuality Theory: A revolutionary approach focused on how systems collapse and adapt over time.Correctness vs. Criticality: Designing architectures that survive off-spec scenarios rather than aiming for perfection.Philosophy in Architecture: Unpacking hidden “default” philosophies that shape how we build software–and why they need to change.Essential Mindset for Architects: Humility, pessimism, and embracing uncertainty as tools for success.  Whether you're a developer, architect, or business stakeholder, this episode will challenge your assumptions and inspire new ways of thinking about software architecture.Timestamps:(02:00) Career Turning Points(10:02) The Architect's Paradox(15:54) Barry's Definition of Architecture(20:24) The Challenges of Time and Change(24:09) The Danger of Software Abstractions(29:41) Understanding Our Architecture Philosophy(37:05) Residue as the Unit of Software Architecture(46:31) Practical Way of Applying Residuality(49:03) The Goal of Architecture is Criticality(52:17) Bridging the Gap Between Architecture and Stakeholders(55:09) 3 Tech Lead Wisdom_____Barry O'Reilly's BioBarry is a veteran Architect who has held Chief Architect positions at Microsoft among others. He has also been a startup CTO, the Worldwide Lead for the Solutions Architecture Community at Microsoft, and founder of the Swedish Azure User Group. He is also a PhD candidate in software design and complexity science.Barry is a regular speaker at international conferences and events, where he shares his insights and expertise. He is the Founder of Black Tulip Technology and the creator of Residuality Theory, which seeks to redefine architecture as the management of complexity.Follow Barry:LinkedIn – linkedin.com/in/barry-o-reilly-b924657/

SUMMARY In this episode, Master Audrey Hussey discusses various aspects of martial arts, including the importance of community, learning from mistakes, and the balance between structure and fun in training. She emphasizes creating a welcoming environment for students and the significance of humor in martial arts. The conversation also touches on the nuances of correctness in martial arts training and the idea of layering knowledge rather than replacing it. She also focuses on the importance of lineage, teaching styles, and the balance between rank progression and personal growth. The conversation shifts to the significance of understanding techniques over mere memorization, the creation of a supportive training environment, and the implementation of innovative teaching methods to engage students. The conversation emphasizes a holistic approach to black belt standards and the flexibility of curriculum to cater to individual student needs. Master Hussey emphasizes the importance of empowerment, adaptation, and community. She discusses her unique experiences as a martial artist and instructor, particularly focusing on the challenges faced during the pandemic and her determination to open a school despite those obstacles. The conversation highlights the holistic approach to martial arts, the significance of personal growth, and the mission to empower others, especially women and children, through martial arts training. TAKEAWAYS Community is essential in martial arts. Learning from mistakes is a key part of growth. Humor can enhance the training experience. Creating a welcoming environment encourages participation. Structure in training should not stifle fun. Correctness in martial arts can be subjective. Layering knowledge allows for personal growth in martial arts. Students should feel comfortable approaching instructors. Martial arts can be a lifelong journey. The culture of martial arts should be inclusive and supportive. Lineage in martial arts can be important but should not be restrictive. Teaching should adapt to the maturity and skill level of students. Not all students will progress at the same rate; individual needs must be recognized. Rank should not be the sole focus; personal growth is essential. Promoting understanding of techniques is more valuable than rote memorization. Creating a supportive environment encourages students to thrive. Flexibility in curriculum allows for dynamic and engaging classes. A holistic approach to black belt standards acknowledges individual strengths and weaknesses. Innovative training techniques can enhance student engagement and learning. It's important to recognize that not every student will excel in every area. Your story as a martial artist is more than just facts. Empowerment is a key mission in martial arts. Adapting to challenges is crucial for success. Opening a school during a pandemic requires resilience. Martial arts can provide confidence and skills to children. Community support is vital for overcoming obstacles. Teaching martial arts is about more than just fighting. Patience is essential in the journey of growth. Every child deserves the opportunity to learn self-defense. Listening to intuition can lead to positive outcomes in teaching. This episode is sponsored by Kataaro. Please check out their site at www.kataaro.com and use the code WK10 to save 10% off your first order. And be sure to ask them about a wholesale account for school owners! All orders for Autism Awareness belts in March and April will see 50% of the PROFITS donated to the International Society for Autism Research!

Zawia Ebrahim 1 March 2025

Recent video game trailers and releases are being trashed online and in comment sections. Naughty Dog's “Intergalactic” was criticized so heavily for their protagonist, a shaved head unidentifiable, the company turned off comments on the trailer. Games like “Concord” lost $400-million and were completely shut down. Countless gamers are furious how Ciri from “The Witcher” has had her look completely changed from female to, maybe female, while others are equally furious over “Dragon Age Veilgaurd” and its totally amateur production. Turns out its director is no surprise, an activist. “Assassin's Creed Shadows” was delayed until February 2025 due to criticism and a Japanese petition to cancel the game due to its cultural insensitivity to Japan. Why? Because Yasuke, a real black man who lived as a vassal to the warlord Oda Nobunaga, was turned into a full-fledged Samurai as the main protagonist of a game set in Japan. It doesn't help that half the staff have literally never made a game before. Defenders of the game say it must be racism, because Japanese didn't care that the other character, Naoe, a female Ninja, wasn't real - yeah, but she's also Japanese, not black. This is the same type of argument made by Corrine Busche of Dragon Age and by the outgoing CEO of Sony, Tony Vinciquerra, over Madame Webb: these things failed because people hated them, largely because of hate campaigns directed at minorities. Or, people hated them because they sucked. On the other hand, there were Onna-Bugeisha in Japan, noble female Samurai warriors. In some battles, up to a third of the warriors were female, though it was uncommon. So the same anger directed as AC-Shadows is not justified when we look at “Ghost of Tsushima 2,” which features of a female Japanese Samurai. Whatever your option is, however, the fact is AAA games are on average failing with massive budgets, often incompetent staff, and inflated promises. That's why games such as MiSide are totally dominating with virtually no budget or staff. -FREE ARCHIVE (w. ads)SUBSCRIPTION ARCHIVEX / TWITTER FACEBOOKWEBSITEPAYPALCashApp: $rdgable EMAIL: rdgable@yahoo.com / TSTRadio@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/tst-radio--5328407/support.

Arif and James are back to first discuss the victory over the Packers. We then preview the NFC #1 seed showdown between the Vikings and the Lions with friend of the show Jeremy Reisman of Pride of Detroit. All this and a fantastic mailbag featuring a discussion on kickers that you won't find anywhere else!    You can become a sustaining member of the show and access exclusive content at  Arif - @Arifhasannfl James - @bigmono Please send any questions or feedback to  or tweet to @norsecodeDN. If you like our show please donate to We have merch! You can visit our shop at: Also a special thank you to DrawPlayDave for our new logo and merchandise design! You can follow him @drawplaydave and visit his main comic page here:

If you want to celebrate your mechanical success before you've succeeded, don't expect much success - Hostus Maximus Justin Fort and Ryan the BMWery Guy test their livers with a debate of all the excellent mistakes they've made when the sips start before the work stops. From the Perrin charge tube that's supposed to take a half-hour to install, not a half-week, to the little things we miss like which way the brake pads go (and what sort of sparks they throw), there's a way to do it and a way you shouldn't (and we've tried both). Not to get too far afield, there's more gearhead goodness to be had: thinking out tube bumpers, sliding your truck into a snow drift before you crash into it, loud and noisy thug trucks, SVT's good old days, verbicide, Mitsubishi Outlanders, vintage Garage Hour cohosts, plus tasting Bushmills and Breckenridge whiskeys, Peach Crown Royal, Absolut Vodka and High Country Lager.  There's also a host of tunes from Karma to Burn, 16 Volt and Deadbolt.

If you want to celebrate your mechanical success before you've succeeded, don't expect much success - Hostus Maximus Justin Fort and Ryan the BMWery Guy test their livers with a debate of all the excellent mistakes they've made when the sips start before the work stops. From the Perrin charge tube that's supposed to take a half-hour to install, not a half-week, to the little things we miss like which way the brake pads go (and what sort of sparks they throw), there's a way to do it and a way you shouldn't (and we've tried both). Not to get too far afield, there's more gearhead goodness to be had: thinking out tube bumpers, sliding your truck into a snow drift before you crash into it, loud and noisy thug trucks, SVT's good old days, verbicide, Mitsubishi Outlanders, vintage Garage Hour cohosts, plus tasting Bushmills and Breckenridge whiskeys, Peach Crown Royal, Absolut Vodka and High Country Lager.  There's also a host of tunes from Karma to Burn, 16 Volt and Deadbolt.

Part 2 with Brooke as she passionately exclaims that political correctness does not equal Christian compassion or courtesy. Why not? Find out how she uses STS to quickly create a bond of trust and enhance camaraderie. Links: Simply the Story … Upcoming workshops … God's Story: From Creation to Eternity …  Moment for Eternity - Training for Evangelism Follow us on Twitter ~ Feedback ~ Facebook ~ iTunes Podcast ~ Vimeo ~ STS Youtube ~ God's Story Youtube

How can mastering the balance between force and skill in Jiu Jitsu transform not only your training but your life? In today's fast-paced world, achieving alignment and mental clarity can seem elusive—this episode can help you find balance, consistency, and efficiency both on and off the mat. Understand how organized spaces and mindful practices enhance your focus and improve your Jiu Jitsu technique. Discover the secret to maximizing efficiency by applying minimal force, saving energy while mastering the art.  Learn how ancient sutras offer profound life lessons that can boost your mental clarity and resilience. Don't miss out on these transformative insights—listen now and start applying these timeless principles to your practice and daily life! Light on the Gentle Art: The Jiu Jitsu Sutras   In this solo-hosted episode of 'The Jiu Jitsu Mindset,' Pete Deeley welcomes Professor Jason Hawkins to discuss his book, 'Light on the Gentle Art: The Jiu Jitsu Sutras.' They delve into the concept of sutras, their historical context, and their purpose in guiding students through a dialogue with their teachers. The conversation then shifts to the practical application of these principles in jiu jitsu and life, including the importance of physical and mental alignment, the value of orderly spaces, and the transformative power of disciplined practice. They explore specific sutras from Hawkins' book, focusing on ideas like the impact of outer space on inner well-being and the concept of 'force absent of skill is brutality.' The discussion touches on the deeper philosophical aspects of jiu jitsu, encouraging listeners to integrate their training into broader life principles for personal growth. 00:00 Introduction and Host Update 00:32 Introducing Professor Jason Hawkins 01:15 Understanding Sutras in Jiu Jitsu 03:46 The Importance of Clean and Organized Training Spaces 06:19 Exploring the Concept of Inner and Outer Space 16:55 The Hollow Body and Internal Configuration 26:05 Force Absent of Skill is Brutality 28:27 Developing Self-Awareness in Jiu-Jitsu 29:34 The Balance Between Force and Technique 29:43 The Concept of Self-Study (Svidhyaya) 31:28 The Feeling of Correctness in Techniques 34:07 Ego and Injuries in Training 36:30 Stages of Life and Training 41:33 Alignment and Misalignment in Practice 41:58 The Importance of Soft Work 42:14 The Role of the Uke in Training 46:11 Applying Jiu-Jitsu Principles Beyond the Mat 47:40 Conclusion and Book Promotion   Join our mailing list here.

In this episode, we welcome Victor Marx to the show. He is a high risk humanitarian, evangelist, author, speaker, filmmaker, and philanthropist. He has done humanitarian work in active war zones in Iraq, Syria, North Africa, and Southeast Asia. He is the Founder of All Things Possible Ministries and has the world record for fastest gun disarm. His autobiography is called The Victor Marx Story and he has a new book out now called The Dangerous Gentleman: A Call for Christian Men to Be Courageous in a Culture of Correctness. In this interview, we discuss the significant abuse he experienced as a child, the difference between physical/sexual abuse and psychological abuse, how he was able to overcome his horrific childhood and not perpetuate the same behavior, how and why he became a Christian, how men can seek their Heavenly Father even though they had/have a terrible earthly father, the problem with passivity and wimpiness in the modern Christian church, why men should strive to become Dangerous Gentleman, how cowardice manifests itself in our modern culture, and much more. Let's get into it…  Episode notes and links HERE. Donate to support our mission of equipping men to push back darkness. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Luke Akehurst, the professional apartheid/genocide lobbyist director of "We Believe In Israel" and influential Labour right functionary, is likely to be handpicked by Keir Starmer's dictatorial leadership to run as MP in a very safe seat in the current UK election. In this extract from a much longer episode from 2018, we go through the mad ideological correctness test off his blog, which he apparently still updates and can be found here: https://lukeakehurst.blogspot.com Recording our first episode proper of the election tomorrow!

In a feedback-fuelled episode, we chat about heresy, gratitude, and the circuit board of love. Is heresy just speculation that is not the official speculation? Do we have to score 100% on our exams to get into heaven? Also, we think about whether sin is better viewed as separation and Nick gets rather agitated about how we read the Bible. Again. Support the podcast Contact the podcast through your email machine Mentioned in this episode: Spotted Flycatcher Eurovision Song Contest Pilgrimage Positive News The Good News Hub Do You Have a Stepford God? The Stepford Wives Sara Pascoe reads a hilarious letter asking for clarity on God's Law

The Morning Show is joined by Journalist Natarsha Belling and Podcast Host, Ryan Jon to discuss an Instagram-famous bakery asking customers not to post images of their staff on social media and Jerry Seinfeld blaming 'political correctness' for the lack of on-screen comedy. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In der heutigen Folge, welche in Kooperation mit shortfilm.de, dem Kurzfilm Magazin der AG Kurzfilm entstanden ist, dreht sich alles um den diskriminierungskritischen Umgang bei der Entwicklung und der Produktion von Kurz- wie Langfilmen. Mit unseren Gästen Arpana Aischa Berndt (Drehbuchautorin und Sensitivity Readerin), Eugene Boateng (Schauspieler) und Sophya Frohberg (Producerin und Sensitivity Readerin) reden wir darüber, was der Begriff “political Correctness” im Bezug auf Film eigentlich bedeutet, wie wir die Wirkungsmacht des Films auf die Gesellschaft sehen und schauen uns die Möglichkeiten an, die ein frühzeitiger diskriminierungskritischer Umgang dem Filmemacher*innen bieten kann. **Zum gesamten Beitrag:** https://indiefilmtalk.de/episodes/04-shortfilm-x-indiefilmtalk-was-darf-film/ ---------- Social Media - @indiefilmtalk Steady - https://steadyhq.com/de/indiefilmtalk/about Paypal - https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/Indiefilmtalk Webseite - https://indiefilmtalk.de/

#motivation #Jesus #bible #subscribers --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/mydisciplecoach/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/mydisciplecoach/support

Sendungshinweis: FM4 Morning SHow, 31.1.2024, 6 Uhr

SHOW #1339 Christian Crafts Xmas Special, Scandals, Vibrational Correctness, Holiday DeStressing --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/bigjujumedia/support

Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: Originality vs. Correctness, published by alkjash on December 6, 2023 on LessWrong. I talk with Alkjash about valuing original thinking vs getting things right. We discuss a few main threads: What are the benefits of epistemic specialisation? What about generalism? How much of the action in an actual human mind is in tweaking your distribution over hypotheses and how much over making sure you're considering good hypotheses? If your hope is to slot into an epistemic process that figures out what's correct in part by you coming up with novel ideas, will processes that are out to get you make you waste your life? Intellectual generals vs supersoldiers Over time I've noticed that I care less and less about epistemic rationality - i.e. being correct - and more and more about being original. Of course the final goal is to produce thoughts that are original AND correct, but I find the originality condition more stringent and worth optimizing for. This might be a feature of working in mathematics where verifying correctness is cheap and reliable. Huh that feels like an interesting take. I don't have a super strong take on originality vs. correctness, but I do think I live my life with more of a "if you don't understand the big picture and your environment well, you'll get got, and also the most important things are 10000x more important than the median important thing, so you really need to be able to notice those opportunities, which requires an accurate map of how things work in-aggregate". Which like, isn't in direct conflict with what you are saying, though maybe is. I think I have two big sets of considerations that make me hesitant to optimize for originality over correctness (and also a bunch the other way around, but I'll argue for one side here first): The world itself is really heavy-tailed and having a good understanding of how most of the world works, while sacrificing deeper understanding of how a narrower slicer of the world works, seems worth it since behind every part of reality that you haven't considered, a crucial consideration might lurk that completely shifts what you want to be doing with your life The obvious example from an LW perspective is encountering the arguments for AI Risk vs. not and some related considerations around "living in the most important century". But also broader things like encountering the tools of proof and empirical science and learning how to program. The world is adversarial in the sense that if you are smart and competent, there are large numbers of people and institutions optimizing to get you to do things that are advantageous to them, ignoring your personal interests. Most smart people "get got" and end up orienting their lives around some random thing they don't even care about that much, because they've gotten their OODA loop captured by some social environment that makes it hard for them to understand what is going on or learn much about what they actually want to do with their lives. I think navigating an adversarial environment like this requires situational awareness and broad maps of the world, and prioritizing originality over correctness IMO makes one substantially more susceptible to a large set of attacks. Some quick gut reactions that I'll reflect/expand on: I think the world is not as heavy-tailed for most human utility functions as you claim. Revealed preferences suggest that saving the world is probably within an OOM as good (to me and most other people) as living ten years longer, or something like this. Same with the difference between $1m and $1b. One of the core heuristics I have is that your perspective (which is one that seems predominant on LW) is one of very low trust in "the intellectual community," leading to every individual doing all the computations from the ground up for themselves. It feels to...

Link to original articleWelcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: Originality vs. Correctness, published by alkjash on December 6, 2023 on LessWrong. I talk with Alkjash about valuing original thinking vs getting things right. We discuss a few main threads: What are the benefits of epistemic specialisation? What about generalism? How much of the action in an actual human mind is in tweaking your distribution over hypotheses and how much over making sure you're considering good hypotheses? If your hope is to slot into an epistemic process that figures out what's correct in part by you coming up with novel ideas, will processes that are out to get you make you waste your life? Intellectual generals vs supersoldiers Over time I've noticed that I care less and less about epistemic rationality - i.e. being correct - and more and more about being original. Of course the final goal is to produce thoughts that are original AND correct, but I find the originality condition more stringent and worth optimizing for. This might be a feature of working in mathematics where verifying correctness is cheap and reliable. Huh that feels like an interesting take. I don't have a super strong take on originality vs. correctness, but I do think I live my life with more of a "if you don't understand the big picture and your environment well, you'll get got, and also the most important things are 10000x more important than the median important thing, so you really need to be able to notice those opportunities, which requires an accurate map of how things work in-aggregate". Which like, isn't in direct conflict with what you are saying, though maybe is. I think I have two big sets of considerations that make me hesitant to optimize for originality over correctness (and also a bunch the other way around, but I'll argue for one side here first): The world itself is really heavy-tailed and having a good understanding of how most of the world works, while sacrificing deeper understanding of how a narrower slicer of the world works, seems worth it since behind every part of reality that you haven't considered, a crucial consideration might lurk that completely shifts what you want to be doing with your life The obvious example from an LW perspective is encountering the arguments for AI Risk vs. not and some related considerations around "living in the most important century". But also broader things like encountering the tools of proof and empirical science and learning how to program. The world is adversarial in the sense that if you are smart and competent, there are large numbers of people and institutions optimizing to get you to do things that are advantageous to them, ignoring your personal interests. Most smart people "get got" and end up orienting their lives around some random thing they don't even care about that much, because they've gotten their OODA loop captured by some social environment that makes it hard for them to understand what is going on or learn much about what they actually want to do with their lives. I think navigating an adversarial environment like this requires situational awareness and broad maps of the world, and prioritizing originality over correctness IMO makes one substantially more susceptible to a large set of attacks. Some quick gut reactions that I'll reflect/expand on: I think the world is not as heavy-tailed for most human utility functions as you claim. Revealed preferences suggest that saving the world is probably within an OOM as good (to me and most other people) as living ten years longer, or something like this. Same with the difference between $1m and $1b. One of the core heuristics I have is that your perspective (which is one that seems predominant on LW) is one of very low trust in "the intellectual community," leading to every individual doing all the computations from the ground up for themselves. It feels to...

231206PC Leonard Bernstein Mensch Mahler am 06.12.2023Bradley Cooper und Lady Gaga – das Traumpaar im Film A Star is born. Sie wissen schon: In a Shallow .... Jetzt ist der Rockmusiker Bradley Cooper über sich hinausgewachsen. Er spielt den legendären Dirigenten Leonard Bernstein – und er macht es unglaublich gut. Morgen kommt der Film in die Kinos. Es gibt nur ein kleines Problem: Leonard Bernstein war Jude. Bradley Cooper ist das nicht. Was soll das für ein Problem sein? Nun – Cooper trägt eine Nasenprothese und bedient damit ein jüdisches Klischee. Dass Bernstein bisexuell gewesen ist, fällt nicht so sehr ins Gewicht. Aber die Judennase ... Ich meine, dass hier wieder mal deutlich zu viel interpretiert wird. Ist es gleich antisemitisch, wenn man versucht, als Nicht-Jude auszusehen, wie Leonard Bernstein, der Jude, nun mal ausgesehen hat?Lasst uns doch einfach mal die political Correctness tiefer hängen. Ein Schauspieler hat die Aufgabe, sich in die Rolle dessen, den er mimt hineinzugeben. Cooper hat jahrelang dragieren gelernt – und er macht es großartig und dem Majestro angemessen. Das allein zählt. Ich freue mich auf den Film, der in dieser Woche in die Kinos kommt und ich werde ihn genießen. Egal, welchen Glauben Bernstein hatte oder nicht hatte – egal, wer Bradley Cooper im wahren Leben ist. Er ist in seiner Rolle Bernstein, einer der genialsten Komponisten, der je den Taktstock geschwungen hat. Lasst die Philo- und die Anti Semitisten diskurrieren – Ich genieße den Film, schwelge in der Musik von Mahler – ja – mein Namensvetter spielt auch eine große Rolle und freue mich über Cooper. So genial hat bisher keiner den Bernstein gegeben. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

London's SOAS once had room for students protesting Margaret Thatcher hosting Israeli PM Yitzhak Shamir. Now it suspends them for demonstrating in support of Palestinians.

Real-time data has many applications but one place where it's extremely valuable is with usage tracking, billing, and generating reports. Ensuring the freshness and availability of this data is not only essential for financial success but also for establishing a more challenging aspect—trust. That's precisely why Orb chose Apache Druid and Imply as the backbone of their advanced pricing platform. This platform encompasses invoicing, usage monitoring, and comprehensive reporting. On this episode, Kshitij Grover, co-founder and CTO at Orb, guides us through their innovative utilization of Druid, allowing their users to assess metrics across queries and beyond. He also gives some great advice for those just starting on their real-time data journey. Definitely worth a listen...or two!

I feel that opera should be inclusive and tell the stories of ordinary people and not just European aristocracy and so I am sketching an opera in which the soprano is furious at the tenor and showing him the proper way to clean a bathroom — “Apri gli occhi, guarda dietro le cose” (Open your eyes, look behind things) — and to calm her he proclaims his love for her — “Farò di tutto per renderti felice” (I will do anything to make you happy) — and as he does his pantaloons start to slide and she points at them but in his passion he doesn't notice and the pants fall to the floor. I was wearing underwear when my pants fell but I leave it to the director to decide. The tenor's back is to the audience and personally I think opera could use a pair of what the Italians would call “glutei nudi.”Garrison KeillorJason Keillor, EngineerJason Keillor, Original Music This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit garrisonkeillor.substack.com/subscribeThis show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5893629/advertisement

This podcast is a commentary and does not contain any copyrighted material of the reference source. We strongly recommend accessing/buying the reference source at the same time. ■Reference Source https://www.ted.com/talks/sally_kohn_let_s_try_emotional_correctness ■Post on this topic (You can get FREE learning materials!) https://englist.me/53-academic-words-reference-from-sally-kohn-lets-try-emotional-correctness-ted-talk/ ■Youtube Video https://youtu.be/pykqdRYTuQs (All Words) https://youtu.be/95J1FBC3tk0 (Advanced Words) https://youtu.be/D-xqMDysypg (Quick Look) ■Top Page for Further Materials https://englist.me/ ■SNS (Please follow!)

A new movie called ‘Essential Church' documents the resistance of some churches to state mandated lockdowns in 2020 and onward. Although the movie is very Christian, it has received very little attention, pro or anti, from any media, as opposed to movies like Sound of Freedom. Why is that? The main premise is whether or not Caesar or God has the ultimate authority of spiritual matters - referencing Romans 13. Mark 12:13-17 is also referenced in the film: “Give back to Caesar what is Caesar's and to God what is God's.” But this line refers more to Buddhist philosophy than some political statement that is applicable today. Christians need to learn that quoting the Bible will not win them battles against the state. The whole issue of power is a matter of precedent, legality, lawfulness, and proof. The Sound of Freedom also took Matthew 18:6 out of context to mean only ‘children' when the verse refers to all of God's children as “little ones” who should not be led astray by sin: “Whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in Me to sin, it would be better for him if a millstone were hung around his neck, and he were drowned in the depth of the sea.” School districts in Utah, Colorado, and Florida are also being bombarded with demands from single individuals, usually working for political groups like Freedom from Religion, to ban the Bible if other books are also going to be banned. After all, the Bible is filled with violence and sex. But there is a major difference between the two. Books like Flamer is a graphic pornographic display of homosexual acts between young boys, Gender Queer is an explicit pornographic display of sex, and This Book is Gay literally teaches the ‘ins and outs of gay sex'. Of the 175 books banned in Florida, 87% were pornographic and in violation of statute 847.012, a law which makes it a felony penalty to distribute porn to children. The Bible, on the other hand, is probably not age appropriate for some little ones in the same way that adults take it as the harshest literal gospel. But if the Bible should be banned for vulgarity or sex, then what about Leviticus 20:13, which must be one of the verse of proof: “‘If a man also lie with mankind as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination.” Christians refer to this as the proof of God's anger with homosexuals, when in fact ‘mankind' could reference all people, and instead refer to promiscuous behavior rather than homosexuality. To advocate for banning the Bible on these grounds is also an advocacy for the destruction of a text based on its perverse homosexual content, which makes the whole thing very ironic.This show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5328407/advertisement

Six years ago, I had the pleasure of interviewing Jordan Peterson. This was when he'd just entered the public sphere with a video criticizing political correctness. Now, at the time the interview didn't get much traction as it was before I had “Crossroads” and before Mr. Peterson became as well known as he is now. But those ideas that we discussed—the underlying problems of postmodernism, how it relates to the communist agenda, the destruction of higher education, and the subversion of the values of the West—have only become more relevant now as society becomes more divided. So I've decided to re-release the interview, I hope you all enjoy! ⭕️

We discuss how mistakes are essential to learning. Hear a story about how a music teacher encouraged a little girl to make mistakes to help her learn; and how trying to do something correctly limits our success.  Visit: https://AchievingExcellence.com and https://DonnaRay.com to learn more about Donna and Al and to explore our class and product offerings.

This week we're talking to AJ Bermudez about her new book, Stories No One Hopes Are About Them, which was nominated for the LAMBDA Literary Award in Bisexual Fiction! We also get into the queer writing process, queer media representation, and hot people we have crushes on. You can find Stories No One Hopes Are About Them here: https://uipress.uiowa.edu/books/stories-no-one-hopes-are-about-them You can follow A.J. on Instagram @a.j.bermudez You can follow A.J. on Twitter @AmandajbermudezYou can find A.J.'s website here: https://amandajbermudez.comYou can submit your own writing to The Maine Review here: https://www.mainereview.com/ You can read more about A.J.'s film, My Dead Friend Zoe, here: https://deadline.com/2023/05/ed-harris-sonequa-martin-green-natalie-morales-join-my-dead-friend-zoe-1235365416/  Support us on Patreon and get exclusive access to cool stuff here: https://www.patreon.com/thebipodFor more content sent right to your inbox every month, subscribe to The Bi Pod Bulletin. Prefer to get social first? Follow us on Instagram @TheBiPod.Want to be included in future mail bag episodes, or just give us your thoughts? You can leave us a voicemail at (480) Hi Bi Pod (480-442-1763) or email us at hey@thebipod.com.The Bi Pod is hosted by Evan Chelsee and Christina Brown. This episode was edited and produced by Evan Chelsee. Our theme song is Coming Home by Snowflake (c) copyright 2020 Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial  (3.0) license. http://dig.ccmixter.org/files/snowflake/61307 Ft: Analog By Nature

The crew commemorates Daniel not trusting Purdue during the College Basketball season with a banner-raising ceremony, and Daniel tries to make sense of the Minnesota Timberwolves' spectacular court-side implosion on the final day of the NBA regular season.

Stand-up comedian, political pundit, and podcast host Geoff Norcott joins Paul Boross to discuss the intersection of humour and politics. He shares his insights on the expectations of audiences and how comedy can bring people together regardless of their political party. “It's good to acknowledge the funny thought about you that they (the audience) may have had. It is a legitimate comedic device of walking out and addressing what people's first thought about you might be. It clears the elephant in the room, and it also shows them that you know what you're doing.” Hear Geoff Norcott discuss the comedy on both sides of the political aisle and provide his thoughts on what makes politicians truly likeable. Learn how humour can help humans combat the division that comes with our modern-day politics only on The Humourology Podcast. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this Spiritual Fire In Fellowship Series ORRA is joined by Take-1 to discuss the many causes of division within freindships, relationships, and dysfunctional families dynamics that stems from evil discord usually sowed by one or more persons.

In this Spiritual Fire In Fellowship Series ORRA is joined by Take-1 to discuss the many causes of division within freindships, relationships, and dysfunctional families dynamics that stems from evil discord usually sowed by one or more persons.

Part riff, part wonder, Joe and Vince talk about how we might be domesticated by our roles to be right and want to let everyone else know we're right, too! And these days, we are more divided than ever. Do we really have the full picture because of our profession, family position, degree and lifelong adventures? Is there such a thing as critical thinking? How do we navigate those times when opinions and viewpoints are running rampant? Can we turn the division into meaningful listening and conversation -- how can you help?  www.friendsinwonder.com#PositionalCorrectness#FamilyGatherings#SocialEtiquette#MeaningfulListening

Boris Sofman is a cryptographist and grace and favour recipient who talks about landraces and their correctness.

HR3 3 Year Old Trans? | PC Correctness & First Amendment | Are You in the Club? 08/02/22 by John Rush

In this week's episode, Anna (https://twitter.com/annarrose) and Kobi (https://twitter.com/kobigurk) chat with guest Jens Groth (https://twitter.com/JensGroth3), Director of Research at DFINITY (https://twitter.com/dfinity) and previously a professor in the Department of Computer Science at UCL. Jens Groth is a leading ZK researcher and is behind a number of advances in the field of ZK in the last few years such as the popular proving system Groth16. The conversation covers his earlier career, the cryptographic problems he tackled in his research, how he solved these, the results of this work as well as his move from research into industry and what he works on today. Here are some links for this episode: * Episode 232: Cutting Edge ZK Research with Mary Maller (https://zeroknowledge.fm/232-2/) * Jens Groth's research (http://www0.cs.ucl.ac.uk/staff/j.groth/) * Efficient Zero-Knowledge Argument for Correctness of a Shuffle (https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-29011-4_17) * Subversion-zero-knowledge SNARKs GGPR (https://eprint.iacr.org/2017/587) * DFINITY (https://dfinity.org) * Internet Computer Protocol (https://internetcomputer.org/) Check out the Zero Knowledge Podcast linktree (https://linktr.ee/zeroknowledge) to stay up-to-date on all the ZK-focused channels and events in our ecosystem Today's episode is sponsored by Anoma (https://anoma.net/) Anoma is a suite of protocols that enable self-sovereign coordination. Their unique architecture facilitates efficiently the simplest forms of economic coordination such as two parties transferring an asset to each other. As well as more sophisticated ones like an asset agnostic bartering system involving multiple parties without direct “coincidence of wants”; or even more complex ones such as “N-party” collective commitments to solve multipolar traps – where any interaction can be performed with adjustable zero-knowledge privacy. Visit Anoma (https://anoma.net/) to learn more! If you like what we do: * Find all our links here! @ZeroKnowledge | Linktree (https://linktr.ee/zeroknowledge) * Subscribe to our podcast newsletter (https://zeroknowledge.substack.com) * Follow us on Twitter @zeroknowledgefm (https://twitter.com/zeroknowledgefm) * Join us on Telegram (https://zeroknowledge.fm/telegram) * Catch us on Youtube (https://zeroknowledge.fm/) * Head to the ZK Community Forum (https://community.zeroknowledge.fm/) * Support our Gitcoin Grant (https://zeroknowledge.fm/gitcoin-grant-329-zkp-2)

Biden says as he pledges support for Ukraine: "We will not fight a war against Russia in Ukraine. Direct confrontation between NATO and Russia is World War 3." How long will the media be carrying the Ukraine news? The confiscation of private Russian citizens is a slippery slope. Correctness of confiscating longtime privately owned Russian sports team? Biden foreign policy is based on TikTok. Journalist Ivory Hecker joins C&B with an update on Biden's border disaster. You know it's bad for Biden when comedians Bill Maher and Trevor Noah praise Donald Trump. Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com

Leland is fascinated by a Chinese dissident who throws the most unexpected curve ball at a typical corporate media reporter on PBS, shutting down the idea that President Trump was an authoritarian - and suggesting it's something else about American culture that we should be worried about.

Bertrand Cooper writes freelance essays that draw on personal experience and social statistics to address conflicts between popular and academic descriptions of America's poor. You can view his work in Current Affairs, People's Policy Project, or follow him on Twitter @_BlackTrash

We review episodes 86-87 of the 2011 anime, with comparisons to chapters 200-204 of the manga. Bisky's back and she's got new drip! Also we meet some fun new characters, like Knuckle, and Shaiapouf, and absolutely nobody else. Our show's Social Media: Twitter | Tumblr Find the hosts elsewhere online: Devon's Twitter | Devon's Tumblr | The Sonic Shuffle Skye's Twitter | Skye's Tumblr Emory's FurAffinity

Jose couldn't make it today so friend of the show Marcus Williams is stepping in.

We often hear of the phrase "political correctness" and how it can create a divide among people.  In Christianity, there is a term that creates that same division called "Biblical Correctness" or people that use the Bible against others for the wrong reasons.  I share in my life what has happened recently with the above term and how we need to find ways to create conversations and not generate divides. 

Blyss and I discuss current topics affecting the birth world. Risks of cesarean section, Covid-19 vaccination in pregnancy update, another loss of choice for LA moms, and intermittent monitoring are on the breakfast table.

There's a way of speaking German that's existed for barely a few decades, but has caused quite the stir in the German public with debates over what it really should be considered. Linguistics has offered the answer: it's Kiezdeutsch, a fully systematic multiethnolect complete with grammatical rules and a unique lexicon. In this episode, join Aaron as he discusses how he learned about Kiezdeutsch, our understanding of right and wrong in terms of language, and why he thinks Kiezdeutsch is a particularly insightful topic that requires further investigation.

Comedian, Podcast, and Relationship banter guru Kristen Carney is here as we countdown to the pending apocalypse in America. Josh has recently gone viral for railing against cancel culture (again), and Kristen weighs in. We have NO idea why things go viral. What do you do with your junk when you transition? We ponder life's bigger questions. We talk about how wild the internet has gotten, and how each day it pushes both of us further to the right (side note: the “right" is just having common sense).

In this episode of the IPPS-A Podcast, we discuss the Army's challenge with data correctness in current personnel systems and how IPPS-A is systematically addressing this for the Total Army. Listen to the subject matter experts take a deep dive into the modernization effort, hosted by COL Gregory Johnson, IPPS-A Functional Management Division Chief, along with MAJ Eric Kim and CW3 Nicholas Rimmer.

Are we living through an era of madness? Stephen Blackwood sits down with best-selling author Douglas Murray to discuss manifestations of madness in contemporary culture. They explore the metaphysical system sustaining present ideologies, consider the necessity of meaning and forgiveness, and move beyond to discuss the transcendent values and works of art that enlighten, and perhaps offer an antidote for, the madness of the present. Works mentioned: Literature: T. S. Eliot, especially The Four Quartets; Philip Larkin; C. Day-Lewis; Shakespeare Music: Palestrina; Orlando Gibbons; Thomas Tallis, especially Spem in Alium and Lamentations of Jeremiah; Gustav Mahler, especially Symphony No. 3; Igor Stravinsky; Olivier Messiaen; Johannes Brahms, piano; Benjamin Britten; Michael Tippett

Richard speaks with a Harvard Medical School professor who warns America is at a crossroads, and its future success or decline will depend on whether its citizens are sufficiently informed about what is driving the current conflicts in society. As a psychoanalyst, he has grown increasingly convinced that Americans— especially those on the Progressive left—are succumbing to neuroticobsessional and quasi-delusional modes of thought. v GUEST:  Dr. Richard Kradin is a physician at the Massachusetts General Hospital, a psychoanalyst with certification in both psychoanalysis and Jungian analysis and professor at Harvard Medical School. He holds graduate degrees in Chemical Physics and Religion. Dr. Kradin is the author of more than 200 articles in the scientific  literature and six textbooks including the Herald Dream (Karnac), The Placebo Response (Routledge), Pathologies of the Mind-Body Interface (Routledge), and the Parting the Ways: Esoteric Judaism in the Psychologies of Freud and Jung (Academic Studies Press). He lectures in the U.S. and internationally. He maintains a private practice in psychoanalysis in Boston, MA. His latest book is titled Out of Control; Apocalyptic Psychology in the Age of Trump.