American economist (1918-2002)
POPULARITY
4 episodes with James Tobin
2 episodes with James Tobin
2 episodes with James Tobin
2 episodes with James Tobin
2 episodes with James Tobin
3 episodes with James Tobin
3 episodes with James Tobin
2 episodes with James Tobin
2 episodes with James Tobin
In this episode, of Leadership Odysseys, we have the pleasure of sitting down with James Tobin, an iconic face in Australian television. With a career spanning over two decades, James has engaged audiences as the weather presenter on Weekend Sunrise, a tech and motoring expert on Better Homes and Gardens, and the host of beloved shows like Beauty and the Geek. From his early days in radio to exploring diverse roles across the Seven Network, James shares the twists and turns of his media journey, his love for travel, and his commitment to meaningful causes. Key Highlights: Journey from Radio to Television: James reflects on his start in radio and how it laid the groundwork for his success on TV. Adventures on the Road: Discussing his travel experiences for Weekend Sunrise and The Great Outdoors, James offers insights into the unforgettable locations and communities he's connected with. Embracing Uncertainty in Media: James shares how he navigates the unpredictability of the media industry with openness and a passion for the work. Passion for Philanthropy: As an ambassador for charities like Tour de Cure and the McGrath Foundation, James explains his commitment to giving back and using his platform for good. Words of Wisdom for Future Leaders: James leaves listeners with memorable advice on authenticity, kindness, and making a positive impact. Join us as James Tobin brings his unique perspective on leadership, resilience, and community. From his engaging travel stories to his meaningful advice for aspiring leaders, this episode is full of inspiration and insights. Tune in to hear more from James and the unforgettable journey that has shaped him. Connect with James Tobin: Instagram Charities: Tour de Cure | McGrath Foundation Connect with Kirsty Gee: LinkedIn | Instagram Sponsorship: Naturally Glutenfree website
Welcome to the Instant Trivia podcast episode 1194, where we ask the best trivia on the Internet. Round 1. Category: And The Award Goes To... 1: This nutty comic won a 1996 National Society of Film Critics award for his role as "The Nutty Professor". Eddie Murphy. 2: Barbara Walters' "20/20" co-host, in 1998 he was awarded the Children's Champion Award from UNICEF. Hugh Downs. 3: While president of the Philippines, she received the Martin Luther King, Jr. Nonviolent Peace Prize. Corazon Aquino. 4: Category for which James Tobin, Gary Becker and Milton Friedman all won Nobel Prizes. Economics. 5: This Spanish cellist was among the first recipients of the Presidential Medal of Freedom. Pablo Casals. Round 2. Category: The Old Testament 1: Potiphar's wife tries to seduce this dream translator, who resists and ends up being sent to jail. Joseph. 2: Recipient of God's bad news "Thou shalt see the land before thee; but thou shalt not go thither". Moses. 3: One lie he told was "If they bind me with 7 green withs that were never dried, then shall I be weak". Samson. 4: He interpreted the "handwriting on the wall" for Belshazzar. Daniel. 5: In Exodus 21, 2 of the 4 body parts that follow "Thou shalt give life for life...". (2 of) an eye, a tooth, a hand and a foot. Round 3. Category: 20Th C. Quotes 1: A remark attributed to Eldridge Cleaver states, "You're either part of the solution or part of" this. the problem. 2: In a 1969 speech, he was 1st to refer to "The Great Silent Majority". Richard Nixon. 3: This clergyman wrote from a Birmingham jail, "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere". Martin Luther King, Jr.. 4: Establishing scholarships in his will he said, "Educational relations make the strongest tie". Cecil Rhodes. 5: This famed WWII correspondent stated, "I write from the worm's-eye point of view". Ernie Pyle. Round 4. Category: Let'S Go For A Spin. With Spin in quotes 1: "Melrose Place" was one for "Beverly Hills 90210". a spin-off. 2: Here are the rules: if the soda container stops rotating and faces you, it's time to pucker up. spin the bottle. 3: It can be a yarn maker, or a woman who never married. a spinster. 4: It's the rotating skid of a car losing control. a spinout. 5: The bowman on a yacht is there to set this sail. a spinnaker. Round 5. Category: Tools Of The Kitchen 1: Different types of these can remove hot stuff from the oven or catch baseballs. a mitt. 2: A pair of hinged metal griddles with a honeycombed interior make up one of these. a waffle iron. 3: Both a product such as Adolph's and a kitchen tool have this name, referring to what they do to meat. a tenderizer. 4: You'll be draining without straining using a Williams-Sonoma one of these holey items. a colander. 5: The name of this perforated pasta prep bowl is from the Latin for "strain". a colander. Thanks for listening! Come back tomorrow for more exciting trivia!Special thanks to https://blog.feedspot.com/trivia_podcasts/ AI Voices used
La renta básica universal (RBU) es un ingreso periódico que el Estado concede sin condiciones a sus ciudadanos. Se trata de una política social redistributiva que busca garantizar que todos puedan optar a un nivel mínimo de ingresos para cubrir las necesidades básicas y reducir la desigualdad. A diferencia de las prestaciones públicas, no depende de las circunstancias personales. Sin embargo, estas sí pueden determinar la cuantía. Existe un debate en torno al concepto y aún no están claros sus beneficios. Distintos autores han propuesto ideas similares a la RBU desde hace siglos. Algunos fueron el británico Thomas Spence, el político estadounidense Thomas Paine o el belga Joseph Charlier en los siglos XVIII y XIX. Esa línea la siguieron otros economistas desde el socialismo, el keynesianismo, como James Tobin, o el liberalismo, como Milton Friedman con el impuesto negativo sobre la renta. La propuesta de una RBU recobró fuerza con la crisis de 2008 y a raíz de la plandemia. Visita elkombo.com Síguenos en Telegram t.me/ElKomboOficial --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/elkombo-oficial/support
Big show today, we walked from Sorrento to Scarborough. And we picked up a few guests along the way. Any Middleton from SAS, Ryan Daniel's, James Tobin from 7 News and Marc Lecras. Enjoy. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
This week we're joined by @jimstogram. James is a photographer Dublin photographer, and a long-time friend of Ryan's. We talk shop about what's going on in the world and Ryan's slight OCD when it comes to notifications & we talk about how much Dublin has changed since we were young'uns! Massive shoutout to Liquid Death for quenching our thirst and delivering a rake of cans to the pod! Like, Follow, Share, and all that good stuff! Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Invité exceptionnel dans Eco d'ici Eco d'ailleurs : l'économiste français Gabriel Zucman, récent lauréat de la médaille John Bates Clark. Cette récompense prestigieuse est décernée chaque année par l'American Economic Association à un (e) chercheur (e) de moins de 40 ans qui a apporté une contribution significative à la pensée et à la connaissance économique, des travaux originaux et influents. Dans l'histoire de ce prix, on retrouve de très grands noms, surtout des Américains, comme Milton Friedman, James Tobin, Joseph Stiglitz ou la franco-américaine Esther Duflo, devenue prix nobel d'économie, comme de nombreux membres de cette liste. NOTRE INVITÉ :Gabriel Zucman, 36 ans, enseigne à l'université de Californie à Berkeley, professeur d'économie à l'Ecole Normale Supérieure et à Paris School of Economics où il dirige l'observatoire européen de la fiscalité. Cette émission réalisée par Guillaume Munier nous mènera aussi au Tchad avec une interview du ministre des Finances, du Budget et des Comptes Publics Tahir Hamid Nguilin ; en Zambie après la tournée en Europe du président Hichilema ; en Turquie à l'occasion des élections sur fond d'inflation et au sein la stratégie de Google, géant américain du numérique qui tente de rattraper son retard dans le développement de l'intelligence artificielle.
Invité exceptionnel dans Eco d'ici Eco d'ailleurs : l'économiste français Gabriel Zucman, récent lauréat de la médaille John Bates Clark. Cette récompense prestigieuse est décernée chaque année par l'American Economic Association à un (e) chercheur (e) de moins de 40 ans qui a apporté une contribution significative à la pensée et à la connaissance économique, des travaux originaux et influents. Dans l'histoire de ce prix, on retrouve de très grands noms, surtout des Américains, comme Milton Friedman, James Tobin, Joseph Stiglitz ou la franco-américaine Esther Duflo, devenue prix nobel d'économie, comme de nombreux membres de cette liste. NOTRE INVITÉ :Gabriel Zucman, 36 ans, enseigne à l'université de Californie à Berkeley, professeur d'économie à l'Ecole Normale Supérieure et à Paris School of Economics où il dirige l'observatoire européen de la fiscalité. Cette émission réalisée par Guillaume Munier nous mènera aussi au Tchad avec une interview du ministre des Finances, du Budget et des Comptes Publics Tahir Hamid Nguilin ; en Zambie après la tournée en Europe du président Hichilema ; en Turquie à l'occasion des élections sur fond d'inflation et au sein la stratégie de Google, géant américain du numérique qui tente de rattraper son retard dans le développement de l'intelligence artificielle.
When Franklin Roosevelt contracted polio at 38, his career seemed over. 12 years later he was elected president -- strengthened, not weakened, by his battle with polio to lead the nation through the Great Depression and World War II. Award-winning author James Tobin tells his story. https://www.jamestobinwrites.com/For info about the book or this podcast please visit our website:http://www.letthemleadbybacon.comhttp://www.johnubacon.comYou can connect with John via these platforms:https://www.facebook.com/johnubaconhttps://twitter.com/Johnubacon
Today's podcast is titled, “Keynesian Economics.” Keynesian Economics w/ Prof. James Tobin, Sterling Professor Emeritus-Economics, Yale University and the winner of the 1981 Nobel Prize in Economics and Robert Shiller, Stanley B. Resor Professor of Economics, Yale University. Listen now, and don't forget to subscribe to get updates each week for the Free To Choose Media Podcast.
What a Friday edition of the show, we spoke to James Tobin from channel 7, Michelle has a big decision to make, we heard your golfing injuries and Xav saw a stranger on his way to work. 14:30 - Xav's neighborhood watch 16:58 - Producer Shaan broke up to what song? 19:00 - Around the grounds 22:37 - Sports report 26:30 - Big Don's drama 30:03 - Crickets or tickets 33:33 - Breaking Blink 182 news 35:12 - Should Michelle get a dog? 43:14 - James Tobin 50:24 - Parking fines have gotten insane 52:38 - What happened on the golf course? See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
James Tobin, representante ciudadano de la Mesa de Seguridad, mencionó que aún hay muchos retos, pero destacó que la administración de Carlos Joaquín González tuvo buenos resultados en cuanto a la disminución de delitos como los homicidios.
As the old nut goes, “To the victor go the spoils.” But if each round of play consolidates the spoils into fewer hands, eventually it comes to pass that wealthy special interests twist the rules so much it undermines the game itself. When economic power overtakes the processes of democratic governance, growth stagnates, and the rift between the rich and poor becomes abyssal. Desperate times and desperate measures jeopardize the fabric of society. How might nonpartisan approaches to this wicked problem help us walk the system back into a healthy balance?Welcome to COMPLEXITY, the official podcast of the Santa Fe Institute. I'm your host, Michael Garfield, and every other week we'll bring you with us for far-ranging conversations with our worldwide network of rigorous researchers developing new frameworks to explain the deepest mysteries of the universe.This week on Complexity we speak with Steven Teles, political scientist at Johns Hopkins University and SFI External Professor Rajiv Sethi, Professor of Economics at Barnard College, Columbia University about how self-serving economic actors intervene in regulation to stifle innovation, increase inequality, and contribute to the conditions in which violence can flourish. Referencing Teles' aisle-crossing book The Captured Economy with co-author Brink Lindsey, we link the problem of regulatory capture in its myriad forms to Sethi's work on race, inequality, and crime, which we discussed in Episode 7 (Rajiv Sethi on Crime, Stereotypes, and The Pursuit of Justice). At the interface between the left and right, public and private, our guests shed light on the forces that divide — and may help reunite — the USA and other modern nations.Be sure to check out our extensive show notes with links to all our references at complexity.simplecast.com. Note that applications are now open for our Complexity Postdoctoral Fellowships! Tell a friend. And if you value our research and communication efforts, please subscribe, rate and review us at Apple Podcasts or Spotify, and consider making a donation — or finding other ways to engage with us — at santafe.edu/engage.Thank you for listening!Join our Facebook discussion group to meet like minds and talk about each episode.Podcast theme music by Mitch Mignano.Follow us on social media:Twitter • YouTube • Facebook • Instagram • LinkedInMore on the Emergent Political Economies SFI Research Theme:SFI launches new research theme on emergent political economiesComplexity 82 - David Krakauer on Emergent Political Economies and A Science of Possibility (EPE 01)Complexity 83 - Eric Beinhocker & Diane Coyle on Rethinking Economics for A Sustainable & Prosperous World (EPE 02)Complexity 84 - Ricardo Hausmann & J. Doyne Farmer on Evolving Technologies & Market Ecologies (EPE 03)Referenced in (or related to) this episode:The Captured Economy: How The Powerful Enrich Themselves, Slow Down Growth, and Increase Inequalityby Brink Lindsey and Steven TelesShadows of Doubt: Stereotypes, Crime, and the Pursuit of Justiceby Brendan O'Flaherty and Rajiv SethiComplexity 19 - David B. Kinney on the Philosophy of ScienceCommon as Airby Lewis HydeSignalling architectures can prevent cancer evolutionby Leonardo Oña & Michael LachmannScaling of urban income inequality in the USAby Elisa Heinrich Mora, Cate Heine, Jacob J. Jackson, Geoffrey B. West, Vicky Chuqiao Yang and Christopher P. KempesCrime and Punishment in a Divided Societyby Rajiv SethiRajiv Sethi discusses gun violence, critical race theory, and bezzleson The Glenn Loury Show (video)(audio-only podcast link)The Gun Deal by Rajiv Sethi (Substack)Rajiv Sethi reviews Boldrin/Levine's Against Intellectual MonopolySteven Teles and Brink Lindsey on EconTalk with Russ RobertsIs Nothing Sacred? Rajiv Sethi on Salman Rushdie (Substack)Rajiv Sethi with Bari Weiss and David French on gun violenceRajiv Sethi on James Tobin's Hirsch Lecture on Functional Inefficiency in Finance (Substack)
This is the first of a two-part episode on modern macro-economics. In today's episode we talk about a distinguished and well rounded British economist Sir John Hicks who got the prize in 1972. We continue with James Tobin who actually got the prize for finance theory, more specifically portfolio selection theory – but he will be mentioned because his many ideas were highly influential on macro, particularly as he was skeptical of rational expectations. We also cover Robert Emerson Lucas Jr. who's work on rational expectations are very important to the field. In season 1 (Danish) we reviewed the history of economic thought before WWII. The coming seasons are dedicated to the Nobel Price in Economics, and I am joined by economist Otto Brøns-Petersen. The Nobel prize is a good benchmark for how the field and profession of economics developed after WWII. We will focus both on the scientific contributions and on the people behind them. These are all star economists and worthy of your time and attention. Some will mainly feature in one episode, others in several. We therefore advice that you listen in the thematic order we propose – but it is up to you. Rest assured, we will cover all… Eventually. References: Hicks banquet speech (1972): www.nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/1972/hicks/speech/ Hicks Nobel lecture: www.nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/1972/hicks/lecture/ Tobin banquet speech (1981): https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/1981/tobin/speech/ (www.nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/1981/tobin/speech/ ) Tobin prize lecture: www.nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/1981/tobin/lecture/ Lucas banquet speech (1995): www.nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/1995/lucas/speech/ Lucas prize lecture: www.nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/1995/lucas/lecture/
TESTO DELL'ARTICOLO ➜ www.bastabugie.it/it/articoli.php?id=2052LE SOCIETA' SEGRETE A CUI APPARTIENE MARIO MONTI: INSIEME A ENRICO LETTA E MARIO DRAGHI... E IN PASSATO BILL CLINTON E TONY BLAIR di Gianfranco AmatoNel suo stellare curriculum il Professor Mario Monti vanta anche studi esteri. Trascorre un anno presso la prestigiosa Università di Yale (U.S.A.), dove diventa allievo di James Tobin, Premio Nobel per l'economia nel 1981. Non abbiamo prove di una sua affiliazione alla Skull and Bones, la celeberrima e potente società segreta di ispirazione mondialista che dal 1832 ha sede presso quel prestigioso ateneo statunitense. Abbiamo però la prova che il professore varesino rappresenti un autentico apostolo del pensiero mondialista.Tre inequivocabili circostanze lo attestano.Mario Monti è membro del Bilderberg Group. La notizia è passata sui media con una certa nonchalance, dovuta più che altro alla non conoscenza, da parte del pubblico comune, della natura di tale sodalizio. Istituito nel 1954 presso castello olandese di Bilderberg, questo esclusivissimo club si ritrova segretamente ogni anno per decidere del futuro dell'umanità. Si tratta dei centrotrenta uomini più potenti e influenti del mondo riuniti in una stessa stanza, che guardie armate tengono lontana da occhi indiscreti.In più di cinquant'anni d'incontri è sempre stata vietata la presenza della stampa, non sono mai state rilasciate dichiarazioni sulle conclusioni degli intervenuti, e non è mai stato svelato l'ordine del giorno. A prescindere da cosa realmente accada in quel segreto consesso, il solo fatto di come si svolga e di chi lo componga lascia alquanto perplessi, e non risponde certo ad una logica di democrazia e trasparenza.Fino all'ultimo momento resta occulto il luogo degli incontri e si interviene solo su espresso invito, che non può essere pubblicamente divulgato, pena la mancata partecipazione Per comprendere meglio di cosa si tratti è sufficiente leggere quanto sul tema ha scritto William Vincent Shannon, non esattamente un paranoico complottista, ma un prestigioso giornalista, redattore del New York Times e ambasciatore degli Stati Uniti in Irlanda durante la Presidenza Carter (1977-1981): «I membri del Bilderberg stanno costruendo l'era del post-nazionalismo: quando non avremo più paesi, ma piuttosto regioni della terra circondate da valori universali.Sarebbe a dire, un'economia globale; un governo mondiale (selezionato piuttosto che eletto) e una religione universale. Per essere sicuri di raggiungere questi obiettivi, i Bilderbergers si concentrano su di un "approccio maggiormente tecnico" e su di una minore consapevolezza da parte del pubblico in generale».Del resto, lo stesso fondatore del Bilderberg Group, il principe Bernardo d'Olanda, sul punto era stato chiaro: «E' difficile rieducare gente allevata al nazionalismo all'idea di rinunciare a parte della loro egemonia a favore di un potere sopranazionale». Onesto, a suo modo, è stato pure David Rockfeller – altro Bilderberg di razza –, il quale ha lasciato scritto nelle sue Memorie (2002): «Alcuni credono che facciamo parte di una cabala segreta che manovra contro gli interessi degli Stati Uniti, definendo me e la mia famiglia come "internazionalisti", e di cospirare con altri nel mondo per costruire una più integrata struttura politico-economica globale, un nuovo mondo, se volete. Se questa è l'accusa, mi dichiaro colpevole, e sono orgoglioso di esserlo».Il giornale londinese The Times, che non può certo definirsi un foglio complottista, nel 1977 descrisse i membri del Bilderberg Group come «una congrega dei più ricchi, dei più economicamente e politicamente potenti e influenti uomini nel mondo occidentale, che si incontrano segretamente per pianificare eventi che poi sembrano accadere per caso». A conferma di quanto avesse ragione l'autorevole quotidiano britannico si possono elencare alcune singolari coincidenze (per citare i casi più noti e più recenti) dovute a fatti accaduti dopo gli incontri del Bilderberg.Bill Clinton partecipa al meeting del 1991; vince le primarie del Partito Democratico, e da oscuro governatore dell'Arkansas diventa Presidente degli Stati Uniti nel 1992. Tony Blair partecipa al meeting del 1993; diventa il leader del Partito Laburista nel luglio del 1994, e viene eletto Primo Ministro nel maggio del 1997. George Robertson partecipa al meeting del 1998; viene nominato Segretario Generale della NATO nell'agosto del 1999. Romano Prodi partecipa al meeting del 1999; riceve l'incarico di Presidente dell'Unione Europea nel settembre del 1999, ricoprendo tale incarico fino a gennaio 2005; nel 2006 viene eletto Presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri italiano.Sembra confermata ancora una volta la saggia conclusione del Barone Denis Winston Healey, ex Ministro britannico della Difesa (1964-1970) e delle Finanze (1974-1979): «Quel che accade nel mondo non avviene per caso; si tratta di eventi fatti succedere, sia che abbiano a che fare con questioni nazionali o commerciali, e la maggioranza di questi eventi sono inscenati da quelli che maneggiano la finanza».Per chi volesse saperne di più, consiglio la lettura di un ottimo testo intitolato The true story of the Bilderberg Group, di Daniel Estulin, un libro di 340 pagine – corredato da una preziosa documentazione – che raccoglie i risultati di una indagine durata anni sull'intoccabile gruppo elitario di cui la stampa ufficiale appare sempre reticente.La seconda prova dell'indole mondialista del nostro esimio professor Monti, risiede nel fatto che egli faccia anche parte della Trilateral Commission. Anzi, per essere precisi, ricopre la carica di Presidente per l'Europa nel triennio 2010-2012. Chi ha l'avventura di accedere al sito ufficiale di quella istituzione (www.trilateral.org), troverà, infatti, una lettera di presentazione sottoscritta da Mario Monti, quale European Chair, da Joseph S. Nye, Jr., quale North American Chair, e da Yotaro Kobayashi, quale Pacific Asian Chair, con tanto di fotografia.Ufficialmente si tratta di un think-tank fondato nel 1973 da David Rockfeller con forte impronta mondialista. Il Professor Piergiorgio Odifreddi (lontanissimo per idee da chi scrive) ha invece liquidato il prestigioso pensatoio internazionale definendolo, su Repubblica (9.11.2011), «una specie di massoneria ultraliberista statunitense, europea enipponica ispirata da David Rockefeller e Henry Kissinger». Quella di Odifreddi non rappresenta, ovviamente, l'unica voce critica nei confronti della Trilateral.Nel 1979 l'ex governatore repubblicano Barry Goldwater la descriveva come «un abile e coordinato sforzo per prendere il controllo e consolidare i quattro centri di potere: politico, monetario, intellettuale ed ecclesiastico grazie alla creazione di una potenza economica mondiale superiore ai governi politici degli Stati coinvolti».Lo scrittore francese Jacques Bordiot, sosteneva, inoltre, che per far parte della Trilateral, era necessario che i candidati fossero «giudicati in grado di comprendere il grande disegno mondiale dell'organizzazione e di lavorare utilmente alla sua realizzazione», e precisava che il vero obiettivo della Trilaterale fosse quello «di esercitare una pressione politica concertata sui governi delle nazioni industrializzate, per portarle a sottomettersi alla loro strategia globale».Il canadese Gilbert Larochelle, professore di filosofia politica presso l'Università del Quebec, nel suo interessante saggio L'imaginaire technocratique, pubblicato a Montreal nel 1990, ha definito, più semplicemente, la Trilateral come una privilegiata elite tecnocratica: «La cittadella trilaterale è un luogo protetto dove la téchne è legge e dove sentinelle, dalle torri di guardia, vegliano e sorvegliano. Ricorrere alla competenza non è affatto un lusso, ma offre la possibilità di mettere la società di fronte a se stessa. Il maggiore benessere deriva solo dai migliori che, nella loro ispirata superiorità, elaborano criteri per poi inviarli verso il basso». Il connotato resta sempre il medesimo: poca democrazia e poca trasparenza. Piccolo inciso legato all'attualità della cronaca politica: un altro italiano membro della Trilateral è l'onorevole Enrico Letta, al centro di una polemica per uno strano biglietto inviato al consociato Professor Monti.La terza prova della visione mondialista di Super Mario sta nel fatto di essere un uomo Goldman Sachs, la celebre banca d'affari fondata nel 1869 da Marcus Goldman, un tedesco di origini ebraiche immigrato negli Stati Uniti, e dal genero Samuel Sachs. Per comprendere la reale natura di tale istituzione non occorre addentrarsi nei siti complottisti. E' sufficiente leggere un autorevole quotidiano come Le Monde del 16 novembre 2011 (proprio il giorno dell'investitura di Monti a Capo del Governo), ed in particolare l'articolo del giornalista Marc Roche, corrispondente da Londra, dal titolo sintomatico: La "franc-maçonnerie" européenne de Goldman Sachs.Si tratta di una vera e propria requisitoria contro la potente banca d'affari. [...] «Confratelli, maestri e gran maestri chiamati a "spandere nell'universo la verità acquisita nella loggia"».
"Sing to the Colors: A Writer Explores Two Centuries at the University of Michigan" is published by the University of Michigan Press.Music in this episode includes:The Yellow and BlueVarsityI Wanna Go Back to Michigan
Entrevista James Tobin 01 Jul 21 Entrevista James Tobin 01 Jul 21 Entrevista James Tobin 01 Jul 21 Entrevista James Tobin 01 Jul 21 Entrevista James Tobin 01 Jul 21 Entrevista James Tobin 01 Jul 21 Entrevista James Tobin 01 Jul 21 Entrevista James Tobin 01 Jul 21 Entrevista James Tobin 01 Jul 21
This episode is sponsored by Masterworks. Charles Goodhart CBE is Emeritus Professor of Banking and Finance at the LSE, having previously been its Deputy Director. Previously, he had worked at the Bank of England for seventeen years including as Chief Adviser and later In 1997 as independent members of the Bank of England's new Monetary Policy Committee until May 2000. He is the developer of Goodhart's law, an economic law named after him. He has written numerous books including the graduate monetary textbook, 'Money, Information and Uncertainty', ‘The Regulatory Response to the Financial Crisis' (2009) and most recently ‘The Great Demographic Reversal: Ageing Societies, Waning Inequality, and an Inflation Revival' (2020). In the podcast, we talk about: Importance of understanding money demand and the money multiplier Should central banks target monetary aggregates and house prices? The problem with the Fed's new inflation targeting objectives. Understanding China's integration to the global economy The challenges of an ageing population Factors that depressed inflation are now turning Why didn't ageing Japan see inflation Why demographics in the US are inflationary Can India and Africa provide the necessary demographic boost to offset DM ageing? Can Tech replace the missing working age population? How to fix the global debt problem Books that influenced Charles: A Monetary History of the United States (Friedman, Schwartz), Golden Fetters (Eichengreen), the works of Dennis Robertson, James Tobin, Charles Kindleberger, and Robert Eisler
5 MART 2021 HERKESE MERHABA. BUGÜN 5 MART 2021. TÜRKİYE VE DÜNYA TARİHİNDE NELER YAŞANMIŞ GELİN HEP BİRLİKTE GÖZ ATALIM DÜNYA TARİHİNDE BUGÜN YAŞANANLAR 1912 - İtalyan Ordusu, hava balonlarını askeri amaçlarla kullanan ilk ordu oldu. İtalyanlar bu hava taşıtlarını, Türk savunma hatlarının gerisine keşif yapmak amacıyla gönderdiler. 1933-Büyük Buhran patlak verdi. ABD başkanı Roosevelt, bütün bankaları kapattı ve finansal işlemleri durdurdu. 1946 - II. Dünya Savaşı'nda ortaya çıkan ve Sovyetler Birliği ile Doğu Avrupa ülkelerini simgeleyen Demirperde kavramı; ilk kez İngiltere Başbakanı Winston Churchill'in bir konuşmasında kullanıldı. TÜRKİYE TARİHİNDE BUGÜN YAŞANANLAR 1920 - Türkiye Yeşilay Cemiyeti kuruldu. 1924 - İstanbul'da Maarif Müdürlüğü, Tevhid-i Tedrisat Kanunu gereğince medreselere el koydu. 1942 - Okul bahçelerine patates, yerelması ve fasulye gibi sebzeler dikilmeye başlandı. 1969 - Balıkesir'de Akbaşlak Köyü Muhtarı, "aminli düğün tüzüğü" hazırladı ve mevlit okutmayan damatlara ceza kesileceğini açıkladı. 1972 - Ağustos 1971'de Sultanahmet'te esrar satarken yakalanan ve 6 yıl hapse mahkûm edilen 14 yaşındaki İngiliz çocuk, Türkiye ile İngiltere arasında sorun oldu. İngiliz basını, "Gaddar Türkler" diye manşetler attı. Bunun üzerine Başbakan Nihat Erim, programında olmasına rağmen, ABD'ye giderken Londra'ya uğramadı. BUGÜN DOĞANLAR 1898 - Japon kadın 2013 yılından ölümüne kadar "Yaşayan En Yaşlı Kişi" unvanı sahibi Misao Ōkawa, dünyaya geldi. 1918 - Amerikalı ekonomist ve Nobel Ödülü sahibi James Tobin, doğdu. BUGÜN ÖLENLER 1953 - 1929'dan beri SSCB liderliğini elinde tutan Sovyetler Birliği Komünist Partisi Birinci Sekreteri Josef Stalin öldü
Michael Spence (MS): The economic outlook is a little grim and tough in the short to medium run. There are two things going on. One is the pandemic, which forced us to conduct experiments in the economy that we normally would have conducted at a much slower pace. And some of those experiments are going to result in learning that changes the whole pattern of work - maybe more working from home, maybe a lot more collaboration, and maybe less international travel. But the flip side is that the pandemic economy both domestically and internationally has suffered an adverse shock with respect to distribution. I looked at a study done at the University of Chicago by a couple of professors early on in the pandemic, and they asked the question, “What fraction of work can be done at home in the United States?” Their answer is (an approximation, because they did it really quickly) was one-third. They also looked at it by geography and then by sector, which is really striking, ranging from around 80% in the tech and financial sectors down to 4% in hospitality, which we've had to mostly shut down in the pandemic. Then there's a serious question that none of us knows the answer to: how fast they can come back? That, I think, depends primarily not on policy so much as how fast we can get the pandemic under control, meaning the prevalence down to the point that people's risk aversion doesn't cause them simply not to go places. And that looks like it is a process that varies across countries. The Chinese have done it more aggressively using tools, including digital ones, that we are not willing to use. And in the west, it is pretty clear the process is not going well. Certainly, there are a set of sectors that are going to struggle to come back.Driving Change (DC): Let's talk first about Europe versus America, where different approaches were taken to the question of, “Can we keep people in jobs for as long as possible, and hope that we come through the pandemic with as much of the existing economy and workforce in place that when things do start to grow, again, we're not having to rebuild from scratch?” How are those experiments and different policies playing out?MS: There are real differences, but the similarity is that everybody basically decided they had to buffer the economy, meaning the household sector and lots of businesses that weren't going to make it. The shock - and most people don't think of it this way - is to the balance sheet. There are a bunch of parts of every economy where the people's balance sheets are fragile and thin enough that they are not much of a shock absorber. So what governments in general have done, basically, is run big deficits and transfer some fairly substantial amount to the sovereign balance sheet, where it's not perfect, but certainly easier to manage. After that, it gets more complicated. In the United States, we had a bunch of programs and unemployment insurance, which is not new, we had programs to support businesses keeping people on and so on. The Europeans were further down that road well before the pandemic, having used this kind of technique in the great financial crisis of 2008/09 and even before, most obviously in Germany and some of the northern countries. But it is also true in Italy, where I live some of the time, which has a program that's similar, where the state absorbs some of the costs. What these economies do is encourage businesses to partner with the state, basically to redistribute the costs around. So jobs get slimmed down, but fewer people are unemployed - they kind of spread the work around. I think that is actually a pretty sensible way to do it. But it is hard to implement. So if you haven't put such a scheme in place beforehand, you can't you can't snap your fingers and get it done overnight.DC: So do you think that America is going to suffer from prolonged higher rates of unemployment because it hasn't had that kind of job sharing scheme? Or at some point, as the furloughs and other job-sharing schemes reach their time limits and stop in Europe, will the unemployment rate there eventually soar too?MS: Yes, we have too many variables! I would say that, if you held everything else constant, American unemployment would be higher. But there are elements in the American economy that might produce faster growth. Where I am in Italy, we have grown essentially negligibly since the year 2000. So that factors in as well. While I'm not wildly pessimistic, I think there are going to be pockets of real distress, people in sectors that really do struggle to come back. That will make unemployment higher than we would like. Especially as it will be a struggle to move those people into other sectors as the economy recovers. There will be a challenge of structural transition of a certain type.DC: There's an ongoing debate about what shape the economic recovery will be: V, W, square root shaped, even a K, where half the economy goes up and the other half goes down. What is your default prediction for how the economy grows from here?MS: The square root is the one that's been used most often in the United States, or as the French call it, the wing of a bird. So you get a sudden very big contraction across countries, then you get a flat period where you're trying to get the virus under control. (I'm speaking now mostly about the developed countries just for a moment.) And then you get things that can come back fairly rapidly, so you get something that starts to look like the start of a W after the after the trough. And then you get ones where the headwinds are a lot bigger, like international air travel: I don't know when people are going to feel safe and comfortable doing that or when all of the bilateral international restrictions are removed (which doesn't look like it will be very fast). So you go down, back up fairly fast, and then start to level out: that's where the square root square root idea comes from. I think that pattern is a reasonable guess.DC: In terms of job creation, normally economists would say just get the economy growing again. Is that the right policy at this point? Or is there more that can be done beyond the stimulus packages there have been so far?MS: The thing we lost track of in America is that the other best thing you can do is get the pandemic under control. I think the differences we see across countries are mainly attributable to that. So a widely available vaccine, provided people actually have it administered to them, would produce a V very quickly, but there's hurdles, even there. I'm appalled at surveys that I read, that a third of the people say they are unwilling to have the vaccine injected. I'm not terribly aggressive about this, but there's a balance between individual freedoms and rights on the one hand and collective interests. My friend, Mohamed El-Erian, put it well. He said, in finance, everybody knows what counterparty risk is. And, if it is big enough, the system stops because nobody trusts the other party. What we have now is individual human counterparty risk: as long as the prevalence of the virus is pretty high, everybody is a risk to everybody else. So we need to do things that reduce that risk, to restore confidence that you can safely engage in ordinary economic activity, like riding the subway to work, and stuff like that. We'll talk more about China later - but China uses digital tools in a way that we probably can't, because of concerns about data and privacy and even trust in the government. So the Chinese are walking around with mobile health certificates that are color coded. So if you're in circulation in China that means that a system powered by a fair amount of data thinks that your probability of being infectious is relatively low. We basically can't do that. Put it into crude terms: we are all yellow.DC: To what extent has a mask become a sort of proxy for that? If people are wearing masks, does that overcome the counterparty risk sufficiently that normal life can resume some extent?MS: It certainly helps. I'm no expert on the medical and epidemiological side of this. Social distancing, I think, is helpful. Being outside is certainly helpful. It seems pretty clear that the most dangerous situation is lots of people in an enclosed space with poor ventilation. So if you're outside, you're not gathering in large crowds, and you're wearing a mask, while it is not a perfect substitute for what we were just talking about, it certainly helps if everybody complies.DC: You brought up China. It started there, but they got on top of it pretty quickly. What is the economy doing in China? What happened to job losses and then job creation after they started to get the pandemic under control? And what does that tell us about what might happen elsewhere?MS: China's recovering pretty quickly. It basically took the hit in the first quarter, mainly, whereas we took the hit in the early part of the second quarter. So they are ahead of us. But because they were so aggressive about it, they literally locked down a whole city of 11m people and didn't let anybody go in and out, China is looking more like a V shaped recovery. But even there, you know, there are sectors that are going to be stubborn with respect to recovery. And China is still an economy, like many others, that is dependent on the state of the rest of the global economy. And there's nothing they can do about that except live with it. So it's a faster recovery than we're seeing in some other places, but it's not just snapping back.DC: We have been talking mostly about the developed economies. What are you seeing in the developing economies? Does this set back the path of development for a lifetime?MS: I think it does, for a while. So if you think of the resources the developed countries went into this with, we're richer, our balance sheets are a little bigger. The sovereign fiscal space is bigger in developed countries than in than in many developing countries. And the medical situation is, they have less capacity. In terms of the kind of basic economic policy tools that you need to use, they are less well armed. If you look at the tracking data for India, the economy is coming back but it's coming back with the virus still growing at a pretty rapid rate. I'm not sure the data are all that good to make significant comparisons across, especially, the poorer countries, but what I'm worried about is that the health/ livelihood trade-off is much starker in the poorer parts of developing countries, or in just plain poor developing countries, and that they'll be forced open up the economy, and then just have to accept the consequences in terms of health, because the alternative, which is locking down the economy for extended period, is worse. That's not necessarily an economic catastrophe. But it's not something that from a health and human welfare standpoint you would wish to see. A vaccine, or some other therapeutic that really works, if it's widely available, would help. There is some international support on all those fronts, medical, financial, and so on. But I don't think it is big enough to blunt the blow to a number of countries.DC: If so, will they continue to be isolated from the global economy, to some extent?MS: They will and they will have to deal too with the unknown consequences of a fragmenting global international infrastructure. For much of the postwar period, these poor countries lived under the big multilateral tent that the United States and others built. It was an important opportunity for growth for many of them - and they still need it, especially the poorer countries. So we don't know, at this point, whether tensions between the US and China and other tensions - Europe is not getting along all that well with China right now, either - will produce some kind of fragmentation that diminishes the opportunity for smaller developing countries, I'm not saying the whole thing is collapsing, to the point that the opportunities are gone, but it is getting there. The other thing they have to deal with is that digital technology is moving so fast, in the area of automation, vision, robotics, and so on. Labor-intensive process-oriented manufacturing as a source of competitive advantage may not be as powerful a driver of the export side of growth as it was in the past. That means not that the global economy is unimportant, but that they have to invent or discover other ways of leveraging the global economy, other sources of comparative advantage.DC: So the old Chinese model of making lots of cheap stuff for the West is not going to work anymore?MS: I think a lot of countries are hoping that the baton will get passed, and the opportunity won't collapse so fast that that it cuts them off. But it looks like it is at least a threat.DC: So we have these two big policy challenges in terms of what we do about the future workforce and getting people jobs. One is the pandemic-related concern about industries where there's high human counterparty risk, as you put it: tourism, travel, etc. The other is where these digital trends have been accelerated by everyone being stuck at home. What policies should governments be adopting to deal with those two quite different shocks in terms of equipping people to get back to work?MS: You are right. They are different. I don't think there's a magic bullet, other than vaccines, that are a substitute for getting the virus under control. So on that one, I'm pretty clear. If you are in an industry that is reliant on basically having trust and low human counterparty risk, such as tourism, your only strategy is to convince potential visitors that it's a virus-free safe place, and you have to convince domestic folks that it's safe to let them in.On the other one, digital and jobs, the lion's share of the discussion, which is not misguided, has to do with really ramping up our capacity for helping people change what they do, their skills and so on. Actually, digital tools are showing, partly as a result of the pandemic experience, that they're really quite useful in doing that. But we are going to need more collaboration that involves business, educational institutions and government. You know, we thought that before and it's even more true now, but can we get it done?DC: What do you have in mind, specifically?MS: Everybody has pieces of the puzzle, right? Businesses know how their business model is evolving and they have a pretty good sense of what skills they need. Armed with the right tools, they can be pretty good educators or partners with educational institutions to get the job done. There's a reasonable amount of evidence that done at a local level, with state governments or local institutions, that these partnerships actually kind of work. A second piece of the puzzle, that nobody I know, is wildly enthusiastic about, is the current scattershot approach to international relations and international trade. We could have a strategy for dealing with China and for dealing with international trade and institutions and so on. We know all that has to change; we are not going to go back to where we were before. That strategy could include domestic employment, around where jobs reside geographically. Done stupidly, that doesn't really help, but done smartly, I think it could. The part that seems to me hard I wrote about recently. In the publicly-traded equity markets, an increasing part of the value that is being created is in is being created by intangible capital. And the entities that are creating it are doing it with a relatively small number of employees. If you stand back from it – and I'm overstating it for simplicity - employment is diverging from value creation measured in that way. Then you ask the question, “Who owns that capital?” The answer is, it is a highly concentrated set of people at the upper end of the wealth distribution, and a bunch of institutions. I think, to fully solve this problem, we are going to have to figure out a way to have broader participation in value creation, the turbocharged parts of the economic value creation process. We don't have that now; actually, nobody has it. This is a challenge that no country I know of has actually addressed effectively. DC: This crisis has brought about an acceleration of a lot of the trends towards greater concentration of wealth amongst a small part of the population. As you say, this does open up some very big questions. Firstly, if most people aren't going to be in jobs that are high in value creation, or there won't be any jobs at all, do we need to provide some kind of universal basic income or equivalent of that to keep people in a decent standard of living? And do we need much heavier taxation of the wealth - and how easy would that be to do politically and practically? Is there a need for nationalizing chunks of the value creating part of the economy, maybe into a common or sovereign wealth fund of some kind?MS: Well, these are things that, if you get them wrong, can really screw up the economy. On the other hand, the trajectory of the distribution of balance sheets in the economy is not very promising from the point of view of political and social cohesion. I think the most promising avenue to explore (and I don't want to pretend that this is a worked-out solution), is to have the public broadly, maybe through the government, be passive owners of the growing parts of the economy. DC: How would it be different from more taxation, the traditional way that we've done that?MS: Given the outcome of the election, I think we're going to do more taxation. But I think exploring this other avenue as a complement to that is a worthwhile idea. We've discussed bits and pieces of this. The late James Tobin put forward a widely discussed, but not implemented, proposal to finance college essentially with loans you pay back based on what you later earn. You would basically pre-commit to a very small fraction of your future income. So people who become artists and musicians, for instance, those who become fabulously wealthy would pay a lot, while others who go into the nonprofit sector and do a lot for their fellow human beings wouldn't pay so much. The mechanics of these things need to be worked out. There's all kinds of moral hazard and other problems that have to be thought through. But I think this is the right time for creativity in these dimensions, as well as the responsible, effective use of the existing tax system.DC: Are you optimistic that we are going to see that? People have been aware for years of the threat that digital posed to a lot of traditional jobs, traditional middle-class employment. Yet there didn't seem to be much policy reaction to that. Might the pandemic shock the world's governments into doing something more ambitious and creative?MS: It depends on where you are, I think, because the exact challenge varies. In the United States, we still have reasonably powerful engines for generating innovative new economic activity, and we don't want to destroy those. But we need to address the problem that a significant subset of the population feels, with some good reason, that they were abandoned over the last few decades, and they don't - I'm going to put this mildly - like their leaders, and the people on the coasts. and so on. It's a little hard to see that, regardless of electoral outcomes, turning into something that, at least in the short run, looks like a constructive dialogue about how to achieve inclusiveness. I'm just trying to be realistic. In Europe, at least on digital, the challenge perceived here is that the industry is way behind. They need more platform companies, they need a cloud computing system, that goes along with their policies with respect to data. They need opportunities for very talented, innovative young people to build companies with supportive ecosystems around them, so they don't have to go to New York or California. So the challenge is to modernize, digitize and get to somewhere near the forefront of innovation. And that has consequences for growth. This is a slightly different perception of the challenges in Europe, which if you look at Gini coefficients, is a more egalitarian operation. It is not exempt from the pressures that we've seen in the United States. David Autor and others have documented that job and income polarization to varying degrees is occurring across a broad swath of the developed world. But we've had policies in Europe that have muted the impacts of that to a greater extent than, say, in the UK or the US.DC: Europe hasn't had a great record of catching up on these sort of innovation deficits. In two or three years, however we think about the relative effectiveness of the policy response to the pandemic in America and Europe, how likely is it that America will emerge with stronger economic prospects than Europe for the decades ahead?MS: People in Europe are a little more optimistic because of the new emergency fund financed with European debt. They are saying this is the first time, unlike in the great financial crisis, that Europe has taken the position that we're in this together, as opposed to “If you're in trouble, it's your fault, get out of it”. It remains to be seen if that turns into more momentum on a broader front. Europe's economy is still fragmented. It needs European level institutions - not bureaucratic ones, but ones that really pump energy into the system. This is bottom line: Europe is pretty far behind.DC: What is the number one policy recommendation you have for policymakers around the world as they think about how to give their people the best chance of getting good work in the years ahead? MS: On the work question, I would first get the virus under control. We need to recognize we have a common problem and cooperate with each other on finding solutions to the pandemic, including technological ones, and then focus on skills, job creation and retraining.
Hillary and Tina cover the Teapot Dome scandal and the New Hampshire Phone Jamming Scandal. For show notes and links to our sources, please click here (https://themuckpodcast.fireside.fm/articles/ep47notes).
Did you know that more than 3 million Domestic Violence incidents are reported each year in the US? But an estimated 10 million go un-reported. This week on BullyBuster, my guest is Sergeant James Tobin, a highly honored police officer, and a big fan of community policing. He's especially concerned about Domestic Violence… where the vast majority of victims are women and children. Sergeant Tobin discusses with me the many ways that women can choose not to stay a victim, which is the beginning of our Triangle of Triumph, Then they can survive this illness in our society and finally become the leader (of their own selves, first). He also talks about how we can all help raise up our women and children, together, because it does take a village.
I welcome James Tobin and Henry Smith on the air as we discuss our passion for soccer, players and clubs of the Premier League and what defenders clubs would want to sign in the current market. A very special thank you to James Tobin with his insight into soccer and his experiences attending games overseas. Thank you to Rentacrate, TitleVest, Phi Kappa Sigma McDaniel, Dan Bokol, Alexa Ray, Kyle Cholokian, Corey Glocker and all of my supporters of SchecSports Podcast.
En este episodio Jesús Mateu, junto con Pedro Trueba y James Tobin hablan acerca del coronavirus (COVID-19) y su impacto en el sector inmobiliario de México. Debido a la contingencia por coronavirus, partes de este episodio están grabadas mediante teléfono móvil, esperamos no lo notes.
Episode 157: Deval Patrick has become very, very rich since leaving the post of Massachusetts governor. That's what happens when you become a managing director of Bain Capital, one of the behemoths in the private equity industry. Patrick became rich working for a company—being a managing director of a company—that has screwed thousands of workers, especially 30,000 workers for Toys R Us who don't have a job today because Bain Capital, with Patrick in the leadership, drove that company into liquidation. I talk about Bain Capital's role in the demise of Toys R Us with Jim Baker, executive director of the Private Equity Stakeholder Project. Over a decade ago, I started reading about something called a “Financial Transactions Tax”. It's often also called a “Tobin Tax” after its creator, economist James Tobin, and it originally focused on taxing currency speculation. But a broader idea is popular: each time a Wall Street trade is made, a very, very, very, tiny tax is levied—which could raise hundreds of billions of dollars, perhaps $1.5 trillion over the next decade. Rep. Peter DeFazio (D-OR) proposed the tax way back in 2008; Bernie Sanders has been for it, and made it part of his 2016 presidential campaign—and both of them are pushing some version of the tax right now in Congress. Jessica Schieder of the Institute for Taxation and Economic Policy, who recently co-authored a paper on the financial transaction tax, chats with me about what the heck it is. -- Jonathan Tasini Follow me on Twitter @jonathantasini Sign up for The Working Life Podcast at: www.workinglife.org Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/jonathan.tasini.3
Episode 157: Deval Patrick has become very, very rich since leaving the post of Massachusetts governor. That's what happens when you become a managing director of Bain Capital, one of the behemoths in the private equity industry. Patrick became rich working for a company—being a managing director of a company—that has screwed thousands of workers, especially 30,000 workers for Toys R Us who don't have a job today because Bain Capital, with Patrick in the leadership, drove that company into liquidation. I talk about Bain Capital's role in the demise of Toys R Us with Jim Baker, executive director of the Private Equity Stakeholder Project.Over a decade ago, I started reading about something called a “Financial Transactions Tax”. It's often also called a “Tobin Tax” after its creator, economist James Tobin, and it originally focused on taxing currency speculation. But a broader idea is popular: each time a Wall Street trade is made, a very, very, very, tiny tax is levied—which could raise hundreds of billions of dollars, perhaps $1.5 trillion over the next decade. Rep. Peter DeFazio (D-OR) proposed the tax way back in 2008; Bernie Sanders has been for it, and made it part of his 2016 presidential campaign—and both of them are pushing some version of the tax right now in Congress. Jessica Schieder of the Institute for Taxation and Economic Policy, who recently co-authored a paper on the financial transaction tax, chats with me about what the heck it is.-- Jonathan TasiniFollow me on Twitter @jonathantasiniSign up for The Working Life Podcast at: www.workinglife.orgFacebook: http://www.facebook.com/jonathan.tasini.3
Episode 157: Deval Patrick has become very, very rich since leaving the post of Massachusetts governor. That’s what happens when you become a managing director of Bain Capital, one of the behemoths in the private equity industry. Patrick became rich working for a company—being a managing director of a company—that has screwed thousands of workers, especially 30,000 workers for Toys R Us who don’t have a job today because Bain Capital, with Patrick in the leadership, drove that company into liquidation. I talk about Bain Capital’s role in the demise of Toys R Us with Jim Baker, executive director of the Private Equity Stakeholder Project. Support the podcast here: www.patreon.com/WorkingLifePodcast Over a decade ago, I started reading about something called a “Financial Transactions Tax”. It’s often also called a “Tobin Tax” after its creator, economist James Tobin, and it originally focused on taxing currency speculation. But a broader idea is popular: each time a Wall Street trade is made, a very, very, very, tiny tax is levied—which could raise hundreds of billions of dollars, perhaps $1.5 trillion over the next decade. Rep. Peter DeFazio (D-OR) proposed the tax way back in 2008; Bernie Sanders has been for it, and made it part of his 2016 presidential campaign—and both of them are pushing some version of the tax right now in Congress. Jessica Schieder of the Institute for Taxation and Economic Policy, who recently co-authored a paper on the financial transaction tax, chats with me about what the heck it is. Support the podcast here: www.patreon.com/WorkingLifePodcast -- Jonathan Tasini Follow me on Twitter @jonathantasini Sign up for The Working Life Podcast at: www.workinglife.org Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/jonathan.tasini.3
This episode was inspired by some of the things we heard while at Xerocon San Diego in June 2019. A major topic of the conference was advisory, and while it has become increasing popular to talk about this opportunity, there aren’t many resources dedicated to putting a plan into action to take it on. So Brooke Roberts and James Tobin sat down to talk about what advisory means, six specific cash flow drivers accountants can monitor to kick-start their services, and some examples of what this looks like in an actual business-accountant relationship. If you have questions please contact us at support@myprofitsee.com or learn more at www.myprofitsee.com
Growing services revenue is imperative for today’s accounting firms, but it is not an easy change to make. The core of advisory is the ability to have proactive conversations with your clients and to help them understand fiscal management. On this episode of Building Your Multi-Million Dollar Practice, we listen to ProfitSee’s Director of Australian Operations, James Tobin, discuss how to create more value when you can’t create more time. This session was originally presented at the Accounting Business Expo in Sydney. Learn more at www.myprofitsee.com
Welcome to another episode of “Building your Multi-Million Dollar Business.” James Tobin, the Director of ProfitSee Operations in Australia, joins us today to discuss “Who’s answering your phone?” After calling multiple accounting firms and seeing their general phone protocols, James shares some of the opportunities that were missed, which ultimately could have brought on new clients.
Sure, we know the War of 1812, but how about the War of 1817? It happened right here at U-M – in 1929. Listen in, as James Tobin recounts more bizarre history of the University. Later in the episode we hear from Aaron Dworkin, former dean of the School of Music, Theatre & Dance. Read full story at Michigan Today How Frank H. Culver changed history
In the critical period of China’s opening in the 1980s, Chinese policymakers invited Western economists to learn and debate the way forward for China, and that’s the subject of fascinating research by Julian Gewirtz in his book “Unlikely Partners: Chinese Reformers, Western Economists, and the Making of Global China” Gewirtz is currently a Fellow in History and Public Policy at the Harvard Kennedy School. He completed doctorate in history at the University of Oxford, and he is interviewed by Charlie Vest, a Master’s Candidate in Chinese Political and Economic Affairs here at the School of Global Policy & Strategy, and he is the Editor-in-Chief for the China Focus blog. This episode was recorded at UC San Diego Editor: Samuel Tsoi Production Support: Mike Fausner Music: Dave Liang/Shanghai Restoration Project
In Episode 98, we welcome a true market veteran, Dr. Ed Yardeni. The episode starts with a fun story about Ed’s school days, studying off Janet Yellen’s notes in James Tobin’s class. But Meb soon brings up Ed’s new book, Predicting the Markets. In it, he writes that if books had theme songs, the appropriate song for his would be the 80s hit, “Don’t Worry Be Happy.” Ed explains this is because, when looking back over the past 40 years, the market has been extraordinarily bullish as a whole. There were plenty of reason to worry along the way, but all in all, the market rewarded brave investors. This eventually leads into a conversation about valuations today that appear somewhat grim, and what Ed’s thoughts are looking forward. Ed tells us it’s okay to be bearish, but don’t forget to get back into the market. He says, “history shows the smartest thing to do is just to invest over the years as you’re getting old, keep putting more money into the markets…recognizing that sometimes you’re going to get bargains and sometimes you’re not.” The conversation drifts toward making macro predictions and the effect of Washington DC on the market. Ed tells us we’re overwhelmed with information and news, which is all the more reason to try to find the fundamental truth that’s out there. Washington doesn’t matter as much as Washington likes to think it matters. Ed gives us more of his thoughts on the market response to Obama, Trump, and the Fed, as well as what he believes actually creates jobs. The conversation turns toward bonds, with Meb asking why bond movements can be challenging to predict. Ed points toward inflation, taking us back to the 50s to discuss bond yields and how they’ve moved in the years since. He brings in nominal GDP and central bankers into the mix. A conversation about negative yielding sovereigns brings various central bankers into the spotlight. Ed walks us through a look back at some of the effects of Fed involvement. He has some interesting thoughts on what the Fed does well – and not so well. This is a great show, melding market history, implementable market wisdom, and Ed’s fascinating career. There’s way more, including where Ed sees the biggest changes coming in technology, and how it will affect markets… Ed’s favorite three indicators… which period over Ed’s 40-year career stands out the most… Ed’s movie reviews… and of course, his most memorable trade. What are the details? Find out in Episode 98.
On this episode of Building Your Multi Million Dollar Practice, our Director of Australian Operations, James Tobin, sat down with Aaron Lane and Kyle Jenkins from Nav CFO in Sydney to talk about the real impact of providing their clients advisory services and how ProfitSee has helped them improve their processes and grow the value they provide. “What ProfitSee brings is a real time reporting that can look backwards and forwards. A lot of the software solutions we looked at previously basically just looked backwards, and if they look forwards it’s in a really rudimentary way,” explains Aaron Lane. Don’t just take our word for it; Listen to this episode to learn how Navigate Virtual CFOs are truly succeeding at becoming their clients’ personal CFO, and how cloud accounting and tools like ProfitSee make it easier. Learn more about their practice, or contact them at https://www.navcfo.com
Mission encre noire Tome 22 Chapitre 275 Le temps présent de Maxime Catellier paru en 2018 aux éditions Boréal Collection Liberté Grande. « Horloge ! dieu sinistre, effrayant, impassible / Dont le doigt nous menace et nous dit: Souviens-toi ! »(Baudelaire). Non, Maxime Catellier ne surgit pas de son terrier affublé d'une montre gigantesque qui court après le temps. Il veut au contraire penser le monde autrement dans cet essai poétique publié dans la nouvelle collection des éditions Boréal dirigée par Robert Lévesque. Empruntez-donc ces ruelles de Montréal, arpentez ces contre-allées de la mémoire dans les pas de l'auteur ! Maxime Catellier bricole une mécanique des mots pour se saisir de l'air du temps, tantôt poète, chantre de l'amitié, parfois pamphlétaire. Empruntez ces lignes de désir, devenez un vagabond magnifique de bord de fleuve ou des villes, le temps d'un flânage par des sentes de fleurs fanées et odorantes. À nous ! nos jeunes années ! À nous ! Nelligan ! À nous ! Maxime Catellier ! L'auteur est notre invité, à Mission encre noire. Extrait:« Ils sont rares les anges qui continuent d'errer par les ruelles oubliés de la ville, les yeux occupés à trouver les pépites d'or dans le tas de métal rouillé. Ils passent pour des chiffonniers, des gueux, des recycleurs que l'avenir n'intéresse pas. Ils fouillent pourtant le présent sans le laisser pourrir dans le réel. Les autres laissent passer ces songes à moitié morts pour se préoccuper des choses vivantes: c'est une erreur qui ne va pas sans fausser les chemins qui les auraient capturés pour sortir ces êtres ailés de leur supplice. Je continue de les suivre, quand ils s'endorment pour fuir la mésaventure. Je me dis que ces anges ont oublié d'ouvrir leurs ailes.» Blues et féminisme noir Angela Davies paru en 2017 aux éditions Libertalia (traduit par Julien Bordier). Gertrude « Ma » Rainey, Bessie Smith et Billie Holiday habitent cet essai publié par la célèbre militante des Black Panthers. Livré dans un magnifique écrin cartonné bleu nuit, un CD accompagnera votre lecture. C'est un splendide voyage intellectuel et historique auquel vous convie l'auteure. Prenant le contre-pied de bien des spécialistes du blues et du jazz, des hommes blancs pour la plupart, Angela Davies s'empare des textes des chansons et de la biographie des trois blues women pour les remettre en perspective historique dans un contexte féministe. Héritière des spirituals, des gospels et des chants des esclaves, ce blues féminin va très vite prendre le contre-pied de la culture dominante et de la domination masculine. L'auteure, figure américaine incontournable, met en évidence les prémices du féminisme noir et affirme déjà les signes annonciateurs des luttes à venir. Extrait:« Un défi tout aussi audacieux est lancé, sur un ton merveilleusement humoristique, dans le Barrel house Blues (« Blues du Barrel House ») de Ma Rainey. Ce morceau clame haut et fort que les femmes veulent boire et passer du bon temps, et revendique leur prérogative, en tant qu'égales des hommes, à se montrer infidèles: Papa likes his sherry, mama likes her port/Papa likes to shimmy, mama likes to sport/Papa likes his bourbon, mama likes her gin/Papa likes his outside women, mama likes her outside men. » Utopies réalistes de Rutger Bregman paru en 2017 aux éditions du Seuil (traduit par Jelia Amrali). Historien, essayiste et journaliste néerlandais, Rutger Bregman veut révolutionner notre mode de vie. Oui, il est possible de vivre mieux, consommer différemment, rêver plus grand et pour tout le monde. Cela vous paraît-il si inatteignable ? tant mieux ! Cet essai se propose de vous sortir de votre prison de pensée. «Monsieur Revenu de base» comme on le surnomme aux Pays-Bas, défriche les meilleurs exemples de projets qui fonctionnent, à travers le monde, pour vous convaincre. Nous avons les moyens de lutter contre l'extrème pauvreté, de tourner à notre profit collectif la numérisation du travail, de ne plus voir l'immigration comme une menace mais comme un atout, de concentrer nos efforts vers les véritables défis à relever du 21 ème siècle. Auriez-vous un besoin urgent de booster votre imaginaire ? Ce discours alternatif sert à ça, et en plus il pourrait bien rallumer vos rêves enfuis de monde meilleur. À vos utopies camarades ! L'international des rêveurs pragmatiques est en marche ! L'avenir nous appartient ! Extrait:« « C'est possible! la pauvreté peut être éradiquée en Amérique d'ici à l'année 1976 », écrivait, confiant, le prix Nobel d'économie James Tobin en 1967. À cette époque, près de 80% d'Américains étaient en faveur de l'idée d'un revenu de base garanti. des années plus tard, on s'en souvient, Ronald Reagan ricanerait:« Dans les années soixante, nous avons déclaré la guerre à la pauvreté et la pauvreté a gagné.» Dans leurs prémisses, les grands moments de l'histoire de la civilisation sont toujours entourés d'un halo d'utopie. D'après le célèbre économiste Albert Hirschman, les utopies sont attaquées sous trois prétextes: C'est vain (ce n'est pas possible), dangereux (trop risqué) et pervers (ça dégénérera en dystopie). Mais Hirschman écrivait aussi qu'il suffit souvent qu'une utopie se réalise pour qu'elle soit presque immédiatement perçue comme un lieu commun.»
Mission encre noire Tome 22 Chapitre 275 Le temps présent de Maxime Catellier paru en 2018 aux éditions Boréal Collection Liberté Grande. « Horloge ! dieu sinistre, effrayant, impassible / Dont le doigt nous menace et nous dit: Souviens-toi ! »(Baudelaire). Non, Maxime Catellier ne surgit pas de son terrier affublé d'une montre gigantesque qui court après le temps. Il veut au contraire penser le monde autrement dans cet essai poétique publié dans la nouvelle collection des éditions Boréal dirigée par Robert Lévesque. Empruntez-donc ces ruelles de Montréal, arpentez ces contre-allées de la mémoire dans les pas de l'auteur ! Maxime Catellier bricole une mécanique des mots pour se saisir de l'air du temps, tantôt poète, chantre de l'amitié, parfois pamphlétaire. Empruntez ces lignes de désir, devenez un vagabond magnifique de bord de fleuve ou des villes, le temps d'un flânage par des sentes de fleurs fanées et odorantes. À nous ! nos jeunes années ! À nous ! Nelligan ! À nous ! Maxime Catellier ! L'auteur est notre invité, à Mission encre noire. Extrait:« Ils sont rares les anges qui continuent d'errer par les ruelles oubliés de la ville, les yeux occupés à trouver les pépites d'or dans le tas de métal rouillé. Ils passent pour des chiffonniers, des gueux, des recycleurs que l'avenir n'intéresse pas. Ils fouillent pourtant le présent sans le laisser pourrir dans le réel. Les autres laissent passer ces songes à moitié morts pour se préoccuper des choses vivantes: c'est une erreur qui ne va pas sans fausser les chemins qui les auraient capturés pour sortir ces êtres ailés de leur supplice. Je continue de les suivre, quand ils s'endorment pour fuir la mésaventure. Je me dis que ces anges ont oublié d'ouvrir leurs ailes.» Blues et féminisme noir Angela Davies paru en 2017 aux éditions Libertalia (traduit par Julien Bordier). Gertrude « Ma » Rainey, Bessie Smith et Billie Holiday habitent cet essai publié par la célèbre militante des Black Panthers. Livré dans un magnifique écrin cartonné bleu nuit, un CD accompagnera votre lecture. C'est un splendide voyage intellectuel et historique auquel vous convie l'auteure. Prenant le contre-pied de bien des spécialistes du blues et du jazz, des hommes blancs pour la plupart, Angela Davies s'empare des textes des chansons et de la biographie des trois blues women pour les remettre en perspective historique dans un contexte féministe. Héritière des spirituals, des gospels et des chants des esclaves, ce blues féminin va très vite prendre le contre-pied de la culture dominante et de la domination masculine. L'auteure, figure américaine incontournable, met en évidence les prémices du féminisme noir et affirme déjà les signes annonciateurs des luttes à venir. Extrait:« Un défi tout aussi audacieux est lancé, sur un ton merveilleusement humoristique, dans le Barrel house Blues (« Blues du Barrel House ») de Ma Rainey. Ce morceau clame haut et fort que les femmes veulent boire et passer du bon temps, et revendique leur prérogative, en tant qu'égales des hommes, à se montrer infidèles: Papa likes his sherry, mama likes her port/Papa likes to shimmy, mama likes to sport/Papa likes his bourbon, mama likes her gin/Papa likes his outside women, mama likes her outside men. » Utopies réalistes de Rutger Bregman paru en 2017 aux éditions du Seuil (traduit par Jelia Amrali). Historien, essayiste et journaliste néerlandais, Rutger Bregman veut révolutionner notre mode de vie. Oui, il est possible de vivre mieux, consommer différemment, rêver plus grand et pour tout le monde. Cela vous paraît-il si inatteignable ? tant mieux ! Cet essai se propose de vous sortir de votre prison de pensée. «Monsieur Revenu de base» comme on le surnomme aux Pays-Bas, défriche les meilleurs exemples de projets qui fonctionnent, à travers le monde, pour vous convaincre. Nous avons les moyens de lutter contre l'extrème pauvreté, de tourner à notre profit collectif la numérisation du travail, de ne plus voir l'immigration comme une menace mais comme un atout, de concentrer nos efforts vers les véritables défis à relever du 21 ème siècle. Auriez-vous un besoin urgent de booster votre imaginaire ? Ce discours alternatif sert à ça, et en plus il pourrait bien rallumer vos rêves enfuis de monde meilleur. À vos utopies camarades ! L'international des rêveurs pragmatiques est en marche ! L'avenir nous appartient ! Extrait:« « C'est possible! la pauvreté peut être éradiquée en Amérique d'ici à l'année 1976 », écrivait, confiant, le prix Nobel d'économie James Tobin en 1967. À cette époque, près de 80% d'Américains étaient en faveur de l'idée d'un revenu de base garanti. des années plus tard, on s'en souvient, Ronald Reagan ricanerait:« Dans les années soixante, nous avons déclaré la guerre à la pauvreté et la pauvreté a gagné.» Dans leurs prémisses, les grands moments de l'histoire de la civilisation sont toujours entourés d'un halo d'utopie. D'après le célèbre économiste Albert Hirschman, les utopies sont attaquées sous trois prétextes: C'est vain (ce n'est pas possible), dangereux (trop risqué) et pervers (ça dégénérera en dystopie). Mais Hirschman écrivait aussi qu'il suffit souvent qu'une utopie se réalise pour qu'elle soit presque immédiatement perçue comme un lieu commun.»
James Tobin nació el 5 de marzo de 1918, en Champaign, Illinois. Su madre era trabajadora social y su padre director de información deportiva en la Universidad de Illinois. Su adolescencia estuvo marcada por la Gran Depresión de los años 30 que vivió Estados Unidos. En una entrevista para The New York Times, tras recibir el Premio Nobel de Economía en 1981, Tobin citó su experiencia de crecer en esa época como una inspiración para el estudio de la economía. Música: Hans Atom - Independence Day
Dec. 6, 2014. In commemoration of composer Irving Fine's centennial, Wayne Shirley, R. James Tobin, Yehudi Wyner and Susan Davenny Wyner discuss the Boston Group of composers and the American Neoclassical school of composition. Speaker Biography: R. James Tobin is author of "Neoclassical Music in America: Voices of Clarity and Restraint." Speaker Biography: Susan Davenny Wyner is a conductor. Speaker Biography: Yehudi Wyner is professor of music emeritus at Brandeis University. Speaker Biography: Wayne Shirley is retired from the music division of the Library of Congress. For transcript, captions, and more information, visit http://www.loc.gov/today/cyberlc/feature_wdesc.php?rec=7062
January 8, 2016 - Today, James Tobin -- winner of the National Book Critics Circle Award in biography -- shares one of the greatest stories of defiance and overcoming infirmity in: The Man He Became: How FDR Defied Polio to Win the Presidency. When polio robbed Franklin Delano Roosevelt of his legs at age 39, the conventional wisdom agreed that his political career was over. Certainly nobody thought he'd rise to the office of his distant cousin, Eleanor's uncle Theodore Roosevelt. But Roosevelt kept trying treatments, methods and exercises to cope with his disability -- a method of never giving up and continuing to try that helped him confront the Great Depression, and the Second World War. History in Five Friday. It’s the perfect way to kick off your modern weekend… with people from the past.
“‘That’s what presidents do these days,’ we think nowadays, ‘They cover things up.'” James Tobin, professor of Media, Journalism and Film at Miami University and speaker of the above quotation, offers The Man He Became: How FDR Defied Polio to Win … Continue reading →
Yoram Bauman is considered the world's first and only stand-up economist and uses cartoons to explain economic concepts and theories. He has a PhD from the University of Washington and a BA in Mathematics from Reed College. Yoram lectured environmental and health economics at both Whitman College and University of Washington and was a visiting research scholar at the University of International Business and Economics in Beijing. Yoram has swapped the lecture hall for the comedy club and is on a mission to spread joy to the world and to reform economics education. Every year Yoram organizes the Humor Session at the American Economic Association annual meeting. Yoram is an advocate for carbon pricing and other economic approaches to protecting the environment. Yoram has written extensively on these issues but has also published numerous micro and macro books with comedy and entertainment as its central theme. They include The Cartoon Introduction to Economics, The Cartoon Introduction to Climate Change and Stand-Up Economics: The Micro Textbook. Some of these books have been translated into over 10 languages. In this interview, Yoram mentions and discusses: adverse selection, portfolio selection theory, the invisible hand, environmental economics, environmental taxes, market power, monopoly, corruption, opportunity cost, free market, revenue-neutral carbon taxes, consumption tax, tragedy of the commons, externalities, correlation, hyperinflation, population growth, economic growth, monetary base and rational expectations. In this interview, Yoram mentions: George Akerlof, James Tobin, Adam Smith, Gregory Mankiw and Paul Krugman. Find out: about revenue-neutral carbon taxing if we should keep economics serious or is there room for comedy? why it's important to motivate people to open a textbook and how humor and comedy can do this. how cartoons and humor can bring so much detail and understanding to economic concepts. where it all began for Yoram when writing a cartoon economics textbook. about the cartoon books written by Yoram that document the annals of economic theory. how Yoram humorously depicts why some economists have won the Nobel Prize in Economics in a simplified and memorable manner. how Adam Smith calls the winners of the Nobel Prize in Economics to interview them. Spooked? Find out how. how Yoram found his true calling while reading Mankiw's economics textbook. how Yoram uses cartoons and comedy to teach us economics and to inform us of the need for environmental taxes, something he is passionate about. and much much more. You can find more content and all the books and links mentioned on this podcast episode at www.economicrockstar/yorambauman
From award-winning biographer James Tobin comes the story of the greatest comeback in American political history. A saga long buried in half-truth, distortion and myth, Tobin's latest book, "The Man He Became," explores Franklin Roosevelt's ten-year climb from paralysis to the White House. (Audio recording courtesy of MetroTV)
From award-winning biographer James Tobin comes the story of the greatest comeback in American political history. A saga long buried in half-truth, distortion and myth, Tobin's latest book, "The Man He Became," explores Franklin Roosevelt's ten-year climb from paralysis to the White House. (Audio recording courtesy of MetroTV)
Une série de 3 épisodes, encore une foi significativement plus long que les 12 minutes affichées (mais je me permet d’être plus long dès que j’ai un invité) suite de discussions avec Stanislas Jourdan autours du revenu de vie/de base. Vous pouvez retrouver Stanislas sur twitter ou sur son blog. Si vous voullez en savoir plus sur la question de l’inflation (liée au RDB) vous pouvez aussi consulter cet article de Stanislas Jourdan. Quelques liens pour en savoir davantage ou pour participer : Une interview de Yoland Bresson sur le revenu d’existance Une interview de Baptiste Mylondo sur rfi et son livre en vente sur eBay L’appel de Philippe Van Parijs pour une allocation universelle L’appel pour un revenue de vie Enfin la liste des prix nobel favorable à l’allocation universelle dont parlait Stanislas : James Meade, James Tobin, Jan Tinbergen, Milton Friedman et Herbert Simon. Vous pouvez me retrouver sur twitter (https://twitter.com/Xilrian) et vous abonner sur : notre flux RSS (http://feeds.feedburner.com/12minutesdeMP3), iTunes (http://itunes.apple.com/fr/podcast/12-minutes-de-.../id482495745), Youtube (http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCq_RSzto0rW5-Gg2693Jylw/videos) et soundcloud (https://soundcloud.com/xilrian).
Une série de 3 épisodes, encore une foi significativement plus long que les 12 minutes affichées (mais je me permet d’être plus long dès que j’ai un invité) suite de discussions avec Stanislas Jourdan autours du revenu de vie/de base. Vous pouvez retrouver Stanislas sur twitter ou sur son blog. Si vous voullez en savoir plus sur la question de l’inflation (liée au RDB) vous pouvez aussi consulter cet article de Stanislas Jourdan. Quelques liens pour en savoir davantage ou pour participer : Une interview de Yoland Bresson sur le revenu d’existance Une interview de Baptiste Mylondo sur rfi et son livre en vente sur eBay L’appel de Philippe Van Parijs pour une allocation universelle L’appel pour un revenue de vie Enfin la liste des prix nobel favorable à l’allocation universelle dont parlait Stanislas : James Meade, James Tobin, Jan Tinbergen, Milton Friedman et Herbert Simon. Vous pouvez me retrouver sur twitter (https://twitter.com/Xilrian) et vous abonner sur : notre flux RSS (http://feeds.feedburner.com/12minutesdeMP3), iTunes (http://itunes.apple.com/fr/podcast/12-minutes-de-.../id482495745), Youtube (http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCq_RSzto0rW5-Gg2693Jylw/videos) et soundcloud (https://soundcloud.com/xilrian).
Une série de 3 épisodes, encore une foi significativement plus long que les 12 minutes affichées (mais je me permet d’être plus long dès que j’ai un invité) suite de discussions avec Stanislas Jourdan autours du revenu de vie/de base. Vous pouvez retrouver Stanislas sur twitter ou sur son blog. Si vous voullez en savoir plus sur la question de l’inflation (liée au RDB) vous pouvez aussi consulter cet article de Stanislas Jourdan. Quelques liens pour en savoir davantage ou pour participer : Une interview de Yoland Bresson sur le revenu d’existance Une interview de Baptiste Mylondo sur rfi et son livre en vente sur eBay L’appel de Philippe Van Parijs pour une allocation universelle L’appel pour un revenue de vie Enfin la liste des prix nobel favorable à l’allocation universelle dont parlait Stanislas : James Meade, James Tobin, Jan Tinbergen, Milton Friedman et Herbert Simon. Vous pouvez me retrouver sur twitter (https://twitter.com/Xilrian) et vous abonner sur : notre flux RSS (http://feeds.feedburner.com/12minutesdeMP3), iTunes (http://itunes.apple.com/fr/podcast/12-minutes-de-.../id482495745), Youtube (http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCq_RSzto0rW5-Gg2693Jylw/videos) et soundcloud (https://soundcloud.com/xilrian).
Une série de 3 épisodes, encore une foi significativement plus long que les 12 minutes affichées (mais je me permet d’être plus long dès que j’ai un invité) suite de discussions avec Stanislas Jourdan autours du revenu de vie/de base. Vous pouvez retrouver Stanislas sur twitter ou sur son blog. Si vous voullez en savoir plus sur la question de l’inflation (liée au RDB) vous pouvez aussi consulter cet article de Stanislas Jourdan. Quelques liens pour en savoir davantage ou pour participer : Une interview de Yoland Bresson sur le revenu d’existance Une interview de Baptiste Mylondo sur rfi et son livre en vente sur eBay L’appel de Philippe Van Parijs pour une allocation universelle L’appel pour un revenue de vie Enfin la liste des prix nobel favorable à l’allocation universelle dont parlait Stanislas : James Meade, James Tobin, Jan Tinbergen, Milton Friedman et Herbert Simon. Vous pouvez me retrouver sur twitter (https://twitter.com/Xilrian) et vous abonner sur : notre flux RSS (http://feeds.feedburner.com/12minutesdeMP3), iTunes (http://itunes.apple.com/fr/podcast/12-minutes-de-.../id482495745), Youtube (http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCq_RSzto0rW5-Gg2693Jylw/videos) et soundcloud (https://soundcloud.com/xilrian).
Une série de 3 épisodes, encore une foi significativement plus long que les 12 minutes affichées (mais je me permet d’être plus long dès que j’ai un invité) suite de discussions avec Stanislas Jourdan autours du revenu de vie/de base. Vous pouvez retrouver Stanislas sur twitter ou sur son blog. Si vous voullez en savoir plus sur la question de l’inflation (liée au RDB) vous pouvez aussi consulter cet article de Stanislas Jourdan. Quelques liens pour en savoir davantage ou pour participer : Une interview de Yoland Bresson sur le revenu d’existance Une interview de Baptiste Mylondo sur rfi et son livre en vente sur eBay L’appel de Philippe Van Parijs pour une allocation universelle L’appel pour un revenue de vie Enfin la liste des prix nobel favorable à l’allocation universelle dont parlait Stanislas : James Meade, James Tobin, Jan Tinbergen, Milton Friedman et Herbert Simon. Vous pouvez me retrouver sur twitter (https://twitter.com/Xilrian) et vous abonner sur : notre flux RSS (http://feeds.feedburner.com/12minutesdeMP3), iTunes (http://itunes.apple.com/fr/podcast/12-minutes-de-.../id482495745), Youtube (http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCq_RSzto0rW5-Gg2693Jylw/videos) et soundcloud (https://soundcloud.com/xilrian).
Une série de 3 épisodes, encore une foi significativement plus long que les 12 minutes affichées (mais je me permet d’être plus long dès que j’ai un invité) suite de discussions avec Stanislas Jourdan autours du revenu de vie/de base. Vous pouvez retrouver Stanislas sur twitter ou sur son blog. Si vous voullez en savoir plus sur la question de l’inflation (liée au RDB) vous pouvez aussi consulter cet article de Stanislas Jourdan. Quelques liens pour en savoir davantage ou pour participer : Une interview de Yoland Bresson sur le revenu d’existance Une interview de Baptiste Mylondo sur rfi et son livre en vente sur eBay L’appel de Philippe Van Parijs pour une allocation universelle L’appel pour un revenue de vie Enfin la liste des prix nobel favorable à l’allocation universelle dont parlait Stanislas : James Meade, James Tobin, Jan Tinbergen, Milton Friedman et Herbert Simon. Vous pouvez me retrouver sur twitter (https://twitter.com/Xilrian) et vous abonner sur : notre flux RSS (http://feeds.feedburner.com/12minutesdeMP3), iTunes (http://itunes.apple.com/fr/podcast/12-minutes-de-.../id482495745), Youtube (http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCq_RSzto0rW5-Gg2693Jylw/videos) et soundcloud (https://soundcloud.com/xilrian).
When Bill Clinton ran for President in 1992, and came in second in the New Hampshire primary, he dubbed himself “the comeback kid.” The idea being that , Americans loved and admired the story of resurgence. The ability and the character to come back from seeming defeat. Perhaps no President's story embodies that more than FDR. Struck down with polio at age thirty-eight, his polio not only further shaped his character, and honed what Oliver Wendell Holmes called “his first class temperament.” but perhaps it also taught him skills that he would need as he taught the nation to deal with and recover from the twin crises of war and depression.James Tobin captures this essence of Roosevelt in The Man He Became: How FDR Defied Polio to Win the PresidencyMy conversation with James Tobin:
The Sidekicks are back to bring you the latest in geeky news, reviews and anything else they can get their grubby little hands on. Welcome to the new companion to Australia's #1 geek culture podcast and TV series, Geek Speak Live! GIANT SIZE Geek Speak Sidekick Issue 5 - Pt.2:- - This issue was so big, we had to make it two parts! - - Brendan gets his 'Batman '66' review, and even slips in one for 'Superman: Secret Identity'. - - The Sidekicks follow up with a more in-depth review of 'Supreme Power' now that Brendan's read it. - - What? Even more comic reviews!? That's right, the boys delve into the fantastic world of Vertigo's 'Fables'. - - Steve unloads about PAX, and find out why he's officially put James Tobin on The List. - For more coverage on all things geeky head along to http://www.facebook.com/geekspeaktv
The sidekicks are back to bring you the latest in geeky news, reviews and anything else they can get their grubby little hands on. Welcome to the new companion to regular podcast, Geek Speak Live! Join Steve and Brendan as they drop some MASSIVE news regarding Oz Comic-Con (which leaves Brendan torn as to which costume to wear next year); discuss new reality show 'Heroes of Cosplay' and cosplay in general, which ends up with Steve calling out TV presenter James Tobin; kneel before newly released 'Injustice' character, General Zod; try to determine 'Guardians of the Galaxy' news or rumour; and Brendan channels his inner Disney geek to bring a review of 'Monsters University'. Steve's slowly teaching Brendan the ways of being more than just the Batman/Bond correspondent, even if it means threatening his prized possessions..... For more coverage on all things geeky head along to http://www.facebook.com/geekspeaktv
To help promote my upcoming gig at the Paramount/Crown & Anchor during Bear Week in Provincetown I put together this light, fun, summery set. It features my remix with LFB of the fantastic new cover of King Of Wishful Thinking by Letta. Enjoy! 1. Rihanna - Stay (Liam Keegan & Anton Powers Remix) 2. Pink feat Nate Ruess - Just Give Me A Reason (Liam Keegan Remix) 3. Kamaliya - I'm Alive (Moto Blanco Club Mix) 4. Samuele Sartini feat. Katherine Ellis - Jumping (Bimbo Jones Remix) 5. Christina Aguilera - Let The Be Love (Bit Error vs. Audien Wayfarer Mash-up) 6. Cahill feat. Kimberley Lock - Feel The Love (Toy Armada & DJ Grind White Party Anthem) 7. Letta - King Of Wishful Thinking (John LePage & LFB Club Mix) 8. Daft Punk feat. Pharrell Williams - Get Lucky (Ranny's Disco Booty Mix) 9. Mia Martina - Heartbreaker (Ralphi Rosario Club Mix) 10. Ce Ce Peniston - Finally (Danny Verde Mash-up) 11. Cher - Woman's World (Danny Verde Club Mix) 12. Freemasons feat Joel Edwards - Dirty Organ (Club Mix) 13. Armin Van Buren feat. Trevor Guthrie - This Is What It Feels Like (Extended Mix) 14. Rihanna - Right Now (Ralphi Rosario Club Mix) 15. Mr. Black - Wake Up (Offer Nissim Remix) 16. James Tobin vs. Carlotta Chadwick - Keep It Coming (Big Room Mix) 17. Kelly Clarkson - People Like Us (Paulo & Jackinsky United Club Mix) 18. Eric Tyrell - World Moves On (Niels Van Gogh vs. Sunloverz Remix) 19. Tegan & Sara - Closer (Sultan & Ned Club Mix) 20. Lawson - Brokenhearted (Seamus Haji Club Mix) 21. Henrik B - Echoes (Extended Mix)
Episode 12 of the Trash Disco Podcast is here! Over an hour of great house music, this month featuring lots of funky stuff! As always, you can get in touch via our Twitter @trashdisco or @kevgreen99. In the mix this month we have: 1. Jamie Lewis ft. Michelle Weeks - Step Up (Jamie Lewis Super Stereo Mix) 2. Carlotta Chadwick, James Tobin, Murray Hood - Keep It Coming (Murray Hood Mix) 3. Lady Lago - The Love I Couldn't Share (Delicious Clubmix) 4. Husky ft. Natalie Conway - Magic In You (Original Mix) 5. Rafael Chavez - For You (Babysitters Remix) 6. Lauer & Canard ft. Max Williams - Looks Like Love (Original Mix) 7. Joey Negro pres. Doug Willis - Spread Love (Alex Kenji Future Disco Mix) 8. Black Connection, Corrado Rizza - Give Me Rhythm (Jay Vegas Remix) 9. Miguel Picasso, Ivan Pica - Dream (Rene Amesz Re-work) 10. Mickael Davis - Zona Vancacy (Original Mix) 11. Woody Bianchi pres. Disconnection - Music (Speaker Buster Remix)
New R&B artist Teri Tobin stops bye to dicuss her career and to Debut her new album "LOVE INFINITY" Teri performed demos and background vocals for artists such as Joe, Chico DeBarge, Coolio, Chante Moore, Korea-based Uptown, Coco Lee and Mica Paris has prepared her for her moment to shine as a solo artist. She also appears on James Tobin's sophomore release entitled " Late Nite" and co-wrote the title track. Upon the release of the independent film Fathers of the Sport, one of the songs she co-wrote can be heard as a backdrop to this powerful film. Although most of her influences are male singers like Stevie Wonder, Luther Vandross, Marvin Gaye, Prince, and Donny Hathaway, Tobin is reminiscent of the sultry sounds and richness of R&B or Jazz singers of yesterday. In the second hour of the show The Legendary leadsinger of R&B Group ENCHANTMENT Mr Emanuel "EJ"Johnson stops bye to discuss his illustrious career and upcoming projects
© 2020-2025 Ivy Podcast Discovery LLC
