POPULARITY
4 episodes with korsgaard
6 episodes with korsgaard
3 episodes with korsgaard
2 episodes with korsgaard
5 episodes with korsgaard
2 episodes with korsgaard
2 episodes with korsgaard
2 episodes with korsgaard
2 episodes with korsgaard
ABSTRACT Christine Korsgaard famously argued that even if we accept the metaphysical theory that there are no selves or persons, the practical standpoint requires us to think of ourselves as unified over time. It is the ability to choose and deliberate, make plans and act that requires me to construct an identity for myself. This practical requirement is antithetical to the Buddhist no-self view. Buddhists argue that it is primarily ignorance about our identity that is responsible for suffering, and that this ignorance consists not just in having a false belief in a metaphysical self but also our ordinary self-conception as being unified across time: our ‘I'-sense, so to say. Buddhists claim that this ‘I'-sense is the real culprit and the source of existential suffering. The Buddhist project of eliminating, or at least reducing, suffering is concerned with arguments to show that there is no metaphysical self and that ‘I'-sense is an illusion that we must get rid of. If Korsgaard is right, it seems that the Buddhist project is in deep trouble. I shall argue that Korsgaard's requirement is too strong. The Buddhist project is sound and Buddhists at all stages of their practice can continue to choose and deliberate, make plans and act ABOUT MONIMA Monima Chadha is Professor of Indian Philosophy at the University of Oxford and Fellow and Tutor in Philosophy at Lady Margaret Hall. Her research interests are in metaphysics and philosophy of mind in classical Indian and contemporary Western traditions. In recent years, she has written a book Selfless Minds (OUP, 2023) and many articles on Buddhist no-self views and their implications for our concepts of subjectivity, agency, responsibility, and ethical life.
I den almene befolkning er Søren Korsgaard og Martin Lindberg Velling måske ikke de mest kendte sportsstjerner. Men det burde atleterne fra Holstebro og Hobro være. De har nemlig igen hentet VM-medaljer hjem til Danmark og dermed manifesteret Danmark som en af verdens allerbedste nationer til pløjning.
This program aims to recover Plato's idea of craft or art, Greek technê, in the expansive sense which includes not only the handicrafts but skilled practices from housebuilding to navigation. Rachel Barney, professor of philosophy at the University of Toronto, examines Plato and other Greek thinkers who were fascinated by the craft model: the idea that both the moral virtue of the good person and the political widom of the expert ruler are — or could be made into — skilled practices as reliable as shoemaking or carpentry. Similar ideas appear in classical Chinese philosophy, developed in very different ways by Daoist and Confucian thinkers. In our time, craft is in a bad way: marginalized in theory and everywhere endangered in practice. Ancient thinkers can help us to see what remains valuable and urgent about craft today, and what a reinvigorated understanding of it might contribute to our ethical and political thought. Crafts to be considered include carpentry, medicine, drawing, film editing, the ‘multicraft' of the restaurant, tennis, and traditional Polynesian navigation. Philosophical points of reference, in addition to Plato, Aristotle, Zhuangzi, and Xunzi, include Murdoch, MacIntyre, Korsgaard, and the Hart-Fuller debate, as well as literary reflections from Kazuo Ishiguro and Cormac McCarthy. Barney is joined by Adam Gopnik, Rachana Kamtekar, Christine Korsgaard, and Alexander Nehamas to discuss the topic of craft. Series: "Tanner Lectures on Human Values" [Humanities] [Business] [Show ID: 39865]
This program aims to recover Plato's idea of craft or art, Greek technê, in the expansive sense which includes not only the handicrafts but skilled practices from housebuilding to navigation. Rachel Barney, professor of philosophy at the University of Toronto, examines Plato and other Greek thinkers who were fascinated by the craft model: the idea that both the moral virtue of the good person and the political widom of the expert ruler are — or could be made into — skilled practices as reliable as shoemaking or carpentry. Similar ideas appear in classical Chinese philosophy, developed in very different ways by Daoist and Confucian thinkers. In our time, craft is in a bad way: marginalized in theory and everywhere endangered in practice. Ancient thinkers can help us to see what remains valuable and urgent about craft today, and what a reinvigorated understanding of it might contribute to our ethical and political thought. Crafts to be considered include carpentry, medicine, drawing, film editing, the ‘multicraft' of the restaurant, tennis, and traditional Polynesian navigation. Philosophical points of reference, in addition to Plato, Aristotle, Zhuangzi, and Xunzi, include Murdoch, MacIntyre, Korsgaard, and the Hart-Fuller debate, as well as literary reflections from Kazuo Ishiguro and Cormac McCarthy. Barney is joined by Adam Gopnik, Rachana Kamtekar, Christine Korsgaard, and Alexander Nehamas to discuss the topic of craft. Series: "Tanner Lectures on Human Values" [Humanities] [Business] [Show ID: 39865]
This program aims to recover Plato's idea of craft or art, Greek technê, in the expansive sense which includes not only the handicrafts but skilled practices from housebuilding to navigation. Rachel Barney, professor of philosophy at the University of Toronto, examines Plato and other Greek thinkers who were fascinated by the craft model: the idea that both the moral virtue of the good person and the political widom of the expert ruler are — or could be made into — skilled practices as reliable as shoemaking or carpentry. Similar ideas appear in classical Chinese philosophy, developed in very different ways by Daoist and Confucian thinkers. In our time, craft is in a bad way: marginalized in theory and everywhere endangered in practice. Ancient thinkers can help us to see what remains valuable and urgent about craft today, and what a reinvigorated understanding of it might contribute to our ethical and political thought. Crafts to be considered include carpentry, medicine, drawing, film editing, the ‘multicraft' of the restaurant, tennis, and traditional Polynesian navigation. Philosophical points of reference, in addition to Plato, Aristotle, Zhuangzi, and Xunzi, include Murdoch, MacIntyre, Korsgaard, and the Hart-Fuller debate, as well as literary reflections from Kazuo Ishiguro and Cormac McCarthy. Barney is joined by Adam Gopnik, Rachana Kamtekar, Christine Korsgaard, and Alexander Nehamas to discuss the topic of craft. Series: "Tanner Lectures on Human Values" [Humanities] [Business] [Show ID: 39865]
The New Yorker: The Writer's Voice - New Fiction from The New Yorker
Thomas Korsgaard reads his story “The Spit of Him” from the March 4, 2024, issue of the magazine. Korsgaard is the author of three novels and two story collections, as well as several works for children. In 2021, at age twenty-six, he became the youngest writer ever to receive Denmark's Golden Laurels prize.
This episode turns to Christine Korsgaard's Tanner lectures, "The Sources of Normativity," to explore how morality might be rationally vindicated from within the nature of practical rationality. Korsgaard's project is an iteration of the Enlightenment's attempt to ground morality in human nature. Korsgaard suggests that the correct moral theory will not merely provide an explanation of our moral natures, but also be justified in the light of our status as reflective animals. Her constructivist account of normativity will conceive of obligations as integral to our sense of identity, which in turn depends on our status as deliberative agents who must act upon some principle. Is the source of normativity a product of the correct application of moral concepts to the sphere of action? Are values the product of our self-legislating will? Can we understand unconditional obligations as derived from our shared identity as human beings?
Mediernes fokus på Barbara Bertelsens mulige involvering i FE-sagen er »konspiratorisk«, mener chefredaktør på Zetland, Lea Korsgaard. Statsministeriets departementschef er urimeligt blevet udråbt som skurk af unuancerede journalister, skrev Korsgaard i en kommentar sidste uge. Mandag i denne uge kunne Frihedsbrevet så afsløre, at Lea Korsgaard var til selvsamme Barbara Bertelsens 50-års fødselsdag, bare ni dage før hun skrev sin bredside mod medierne. Hvorfor nævnte hun ikke det i sin kommentar? Hvor efterlader det Lea Korsgaards egen troværdighed? Gæst: Lea Korsgaard, chefredaktør på Zetland. Vært: Kaare Svejstrup. Programmet er en genudsendelse. Sendt første gang 16. november 2023.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Fossende vandmasser, rekordhøje temperaturer, tørke og nu en bidende kold vinter, der rammer tidligere end normalt. Vejret i 2023 har været det mest ekstreme nogensinde målt.Også lidt udenfor Holstebro, hvor landmand Søren Korsgaard betaler prisen for det vanvittige vejr.Jyllands-Postens ”gamle ægtepar”, de erfarne klimajournalister Klaus Dohm og Lars From, beskriver årets ekstreme vejr gennem landmandens umulige kamp mod vejrguderne.Er 2023 et forvarsel om den fremtid, Søren Korsgaard og vi andre er nødt til at vænne os til?Gæster: Klaus Dohm og Lars From, klimajournalister på Jyllands-PostenVært: Jacob Grosen Hvis du vil vide mere er sponseret af OK Ladepakke
Mediernes fokus på Barbara Bertelsens mulige involvering i FE-sagen er »konspiratorisk«, mener chefredaktør på Zetland, Lea Korsgaard. Statsministeriets departementschef er urimeligt blevet udråbt som skurk af unuancerede journalister, skrev Korsgaard i en kommentar sidste uge. Mandag i denne uge kunne Frihedsbrevet så afsløre, at Lea Korsgaard var til selvsamme Barbara Bertelsens 50-års fødselsdag, bare ni dage før hun skrev sin bredside mod medierne. Hvorfor nævnte hun ikke det i sin kommentar? Hvor efterlader det Lea Korsgaards egen troværdighed? Gæst: Lea Korsgaard, chefredaktør på Zetland. Vært: Kaare Svejstrup. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
⬇️ Register for our brand new FREE live event: Become The Dream Coach Mastercla$$ ⬇️Become The Dream Coach Mastercla$$Today's guest, Lizzie Korsgaard, is an incredible QCA alumna who used to be all too familiar with being successful on the outside while feeling empty and unfulfilled on the inside. Lizzie found herself in a thriving corporate career in the financial industry, yet she yearned for something more. Navigating depression, anxiety, and burnout nudged Lizzie into making a courageous decision. After 10 years in the corporate world, Lizzie decided to prioritize herself and leave her corporate career. Soon after, she started her own business as a brand photographer before pivoting into her calling and becoming a coach.Now, Lizzie uses the power of asking better questions to help her clients gain clarity and overcome the fears that are holding them back so they can finally start their courageous journey toward a career and life they love.Everyone has the ability to dig deeper to reach their full potential, but none of us can do it alone. Coaching is a vehicle that can help everyone everywhere live with greater purpose, clarity, and passion.When we begin to fully realize our own power and experience change from within, we can acknowledge that we are the leaders of our own lives, and a world of possibility opens up for us.
Thomas Korsgaard har gått sin seiersgang i den danske litterære offentligheten siden han debuterte bare 21 år gammel i 2017. Han står i spissen for en ny generasjon forfattere som skriver om fattigdom, omsorgssvikt og klasse, og livet i utkanten av det danske velferdssamfunnet.Debutromanen Hvis det skulle komme et menneske ble etterfulgt av En dag vil vi le av det (begge til norsk ved Hilde Rød-Larsen), og Man skulle nok have været der. For sistnevnte vant Korsgaard den prestisjefulle prisen De Gyldne Laurbær, som yngste forfatter i prisens historie. Trilogien skildrer gutten Tue og hans oppvekst med en voldelig far og en psykisk syk mor på en gård utenfor den lille byen Skive, og veien hans vekk fra denne hverdagen. Historien tar utgangspunkt i Korsgaards eget liv, og beskriver en enorm sosial, kulturell og økonomisk omveltning: en klassereise – fra den fattige og ulykkelige oppveksten, til starten på et nytt liv som forfatter i København – og en sosial og eksistensiell reise i jakten på å finne seg selv.Korsgaard har et litterært slektskap med forfattere som Édouard Louis, Tove Ditlevsen og forfatterkollega Vigdis Hjorth, som også har tatt utgangspunkt i egen oppvekst og erfaring i flere romaner. Nå møtes Korsgaard og Hjorth til samtale om vanskelige familieforhold, fattigdom, klasse og å skrive utfra seg selv. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Rune and me are discussing the excuse of not being physically as strong as the international players. And after that, we are happy to have Henrik Heise Korsgaard, born 1996 and former college player as a guest, just home coming after two successful UTR tournaments in Japan. He explain how he looks at his own playing career at the moment.
Italien-Korrespondentin Helen Hecker traf auf dem International Journalism Festival in Perugia die Medien-Pionierin Lea Korsgaard. Sie ist ist eine der führenden Journalistinnen in Dänemark und die Mitbegründerin / Chefredakteurin des erfolgreichen digitalen Magazins Zetland. Das innovative Medienunternehmen konzentriert sich auf qualitativ hochwertigen Journalismus und eine enge Zusammenarbeit mit seiner Community. Mit ihrer Arbeit spielte Korsgaard eine wichtige Rolle dabei, die Art und Weise zu verändern, wie Nachrichten in Dänemark konsumiert werden. Im Interview haben wir mit ihr über Herausforderungen und Chancen gesprochen, die sich für den Journalismus im digitalen Zeitalter ergeben.
Sean C.W. Korsgaard welcomes Gregory Frost, Howard Andrew Jones, Marissa Wolf, and Monalisa Foster to Baen Books; and Cobra by Timothy Zahn, Part 53. View the podcast in video form at https://www.baen.com/podcastfiles/mp3/video-baen-free-radio-hour-New-Authors-Welcom-Cobra-part-53.mp4 and the Baen YouTube Channel.
On this episode of the Scale Up Valley Podcast, Mike Dias speaks with Anders Korsgaard, CEO at Blue World Technologies Key Takeaways Accelerating the green transition of the world by enabling the use of green fuel through high efficiency Lessons learned from migrating an entire team of 40 people to a new venture Fundraising lessons - from pre-seed to series B raising funds every 12 months Valuing partnership as a way to grow The experience of working with Bill Gates founded Breakthrough Energy fund
How do publishers promote their author's books, and what kind of decision-making goes into that? Why don't they just press the big red button marked "Instant Best Seller"? Wanting answers, we recorded Oliver's conversation about all this with Sean CW Korsgaard, who works on the promotion side of Baen Books in his roles as Assistant Editor and Media & Military Liason. Baen Books ( Facebook, Twitter) www.soimwritinganovel.com PATREON: www.patreon.com/soimwritinganovel BUY OLIVER'S BOOKS: https://www.oliverbrackenbury.com/store SO I'M WRITING A NOVEL... TWITTER: https://twitter.com/so_writing OLIVER'S TWITTER: https://twitter.com/obrackenbury Oliver's Link Tree (For everything else): https://linktr.ee/obrackenbury
In this episode of Behind Massive Screens, Petter and Dori sit down with Lead Game Designer Lau Korsgaard to talk about experimental game design, indie development versus AAA, what uses a regular controller can have beyond the norm, and how games without rules can encourage social interaction. From being a part of an indie development collective to working in AAA gaming, Lau has gone on quite the design journey. Join us as we find out more about how his past informs his present, and what impact the indie scene has had on the major development studios.
Sean C.W. Korsgaard talks to editor Stephen Lawson and contributors Sean Patrick Hazlett, Monalisa Foster, and Phillip Kramer about new anthology Robosoldiers: Thank You for Your Servos and Cobra by Timothy Zahn, Part 12. View the podcast in video form at https://www.baen.com/podcastfiles/mp3/video-baen-free-radio-hour-Robosoldiers-Cobra-part-12.mp4 and the Baen YouTube Channel.
In this reading group episode, we discuss Gary Watson's paper on Intelligible Moral Demand being a way to view the debate on moral responsibility. That paper is his Responsibility and the Limits of Evil: Variations on a Strawsonian Theme. Here's any links you'll need to dive deeper: https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/polopoly_fs/1.101515!/file/watson-responsibility-limits-of-evil.pdf Twitter: @JordanCMyers You can also get in contact by emailing me at platoscavepodcast@gmail.com Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCD1RiH1j-M6C59z1upPXkWw?disable_polymer=true Plato's Cave Website: https://platoscave.fireside.fm/ Special Guests: Adam (Reading Group Discussions) and Giffin (Reading Group Discussions).
In this reading group episode, we go deep into the weeds of PF Strawson's "Freedom and Resentment." Here's any links you'll need to dive deeper: PDF:http://www.filosofia.unimi.it/zucchi/NuoviFile/FreedomandResentment.pdf Twitter: @JordanCMyers You can also get in contact by emailing me at platoscavepodcast@gmail.com Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCD1RiH1j-M6C59z1upPXkWw?disable_polymer=true Plato's Cave Website: https://platoscave.fireside.fm/ Special Guests: Adam (Reading Group Discussions) and Giffin (Reading Group Discussions).
In this reading group discussion episode, we discuss Galen Strawson's "The Impossibility of Moral Responsibility" and Derk Pereboom's Four Case Argument against compatibilism. Here's any links you'll need to dive deeper: http://static1.squarespace.com/static/551587e0e4b0ce927f09707f/t/57b5d14de58c624a6d3a5e99/1471533403405/Strawson%2C+The+Impossibility+of+Moral+Responsibility.pdf https://philosophicaldisquisitions.blogspot.com/2015/01/perebooms-four-case-argument-against.html Twitter: @JordanCMyers You can also get in contact by emailing me at platoscavepodcast@gmail.com Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCD1RiH1j-M6C59z1upPXkWw?disable_polymer=true Plato's Cave Website: https://platoscave.fireside.fm/ Special Guests: Adam (Reading Group Discussions) and Giffin (Reading Group Discussions).
Steve is a philosopher and professor emeritus of philosophy at California State University, East Bay who specializes in animal ethics, environmental ethics and meta-ethics. He was co-founder in 1985 of the journal Between the Species: A Journal of Ethics and served as its initial co-editor. Steve was a member of the board of the American Philosophical Quarterly (1991–1994). In 1983, Steve founded, with his wife Jeanne, the Hayward Friends of Animals Humane Society. They now operate Second Chance, Helping the Pets of People in Need, in California. Steve wrote Morals, Reason, and Animals, in 1987, Subjective Morals, in 2011, and edited Food for Thought: The Debate over Eating Meat; published in 2004. In Sentientist Conversations we talk about the two most important questions: “what's real?” & “what matters?” Sentientism is "evidence, reason & compassion for all sentient beings." The video of our conversation is here on YouTube. We discuss: 00:00 Welcome 01:34 Steve's Intro - Getting out of the ivory tower "Put the values you espouse into effect & help the animals" - A seminal early voice in animal ethics 6:05 What's Real? - Growing up in Salt Lake City - Immigrant parents from war-torn Europe "focused on making sure they could make a living" - Greek Orthodox & Methodist Christian parents - Sunday School - Order of the Cross cult (vegetarian because of reincarnation) - "I was never interested in religion" "The story of Noah was really nuts" - "The story in the 1950's was you couldn't survive without meat... but my mother proved that wrong" - "We liked animals... didn't see the need to kill them for something totally unnecessary" - James vs. Bertrand Russell "It's immoral to believe something just because it makes you feel good" 17:03 What Matters? - Literature as a way into philosophy - Philosophy at Rice University (classical, medieval, existential) 22:52 Who Matters? - Singer's Animal Liberation - Animals "were my friends" - "The most basic principle of morality is not to cause suffering for no good reason" - "I was very much a Kantian" - Writing "Are Animals Moral Beings" - "Utilitarianism can tend to subordinate the indvidual... it tried to do a science of ethics" - "Kantianism has problems too" - Pluralism & pragmatism: Care ethics, Singer & utility, Regan & rights, Korsgaard & Kant... - "We need to build on history" - Anthropocentric & bio/ecocentric challenges - “A lot of environmental ethics… is nonsense” ...and much more. Full show notes at Sentientism.info. Sentientism is “Evidence, reason & compassion for all sentient beings.” More at Sentientism.info. Join our "I'm a Sentientist" wall via this simple form. Everyone, Sentientist or not, is welcome in our groups. The biggest so far is here on FaceBook. Come join us there! Thanks Graham.
David Afsharirad and Toni Weisskopf welcome the newest members of the Baen team: Sean C.W. Korsgaard and D.J. Butler; and Live Free or Die by John Ringo, Part 15. View the podcast in video form at https://www.baen.com/podcastfiles/mp3/video-baen-free-radio-hour-1637-the-coast-of-chaos-part-two-live-free-or-die-part-fourteen.mp4 and the Baen YouTube Channel.
Falls euch cogitamus gefällt, lasst bitte ein Abo da und/oder empfehlt uns weiter. Ihr könnt gerne bei YouTube in den Kommentaren oder über cogitamus@posteo.de mit uns diskutieren und argumentieren. Für neue Gedanken sind wir immer offen. Ihr dürft uns gerne bei YouTube abonnieren: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC2YdZ5ryFQ32Zd75m2AW5cw Unterstützen könnt ihr uns ebenfalls: paypal.me/cogitamus oder cogitamus@posteo.de Platon, Aristoteles, Kant, Nietzsche, Singer – die Geschichte ist voll von männlichen, allseits bekannten Philosophen. Es wird Zeit für die Vorstellung unbekannter Philosoph:innen! Von Zeit und Zeit werden wir deshalb im deutschsprachigen Raum weniger populäre philosophische Personen in einem kurzen, knackigen Beitrag präsentieren. Wir beginnen mit der US-amerikanischen Philosophin Christine Korsgaard, die sich zeitlebens mit Kant und Tierethik beschäftigt. Literatur/Links/Quellen Persönlicher Einblick: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jzBLPDt-Bl0 Christine Korsgaard – Fellow Creatures Christine M. Korsgaard - Tiere wie wir. Warum wir moralische Pflichten gegenüber Tieren haben. Eine Ethik (C.H. Beck, München 2021) Rezension zu Fellow Creatures: https://www.deutschlandfunkkultur.de/christine-m-korsgaard-tiere-wie-wir-nicht-nur-menschen.2162.de.html?dram:article_id=496816 Rezension zu Fellow Creatures mit tierethischem Theoriehintergrund: https://re-visionen.net/eckart-loehr-rezension-korsgaard-tiere-wie-wir/ Homepage von C. Korsgaard: https://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~korsgaar/index.html Bild: https://www.sarabizarro.net/shop-1/portrait-of-philosopher-christine-korsgaard-original
Learn how to protect your pets from the chemicals in your home; and why resilience is a process, not a fixed trait. More from Rodney Habib and Dr. Karen Shaw Becker: Pick up "The Forever Dog: Surprising New Science to Help Your Canine Companion Live Younger, Healthier, and Longer": https://foreverdog.com/about/ Dr. Karen Becker on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/doctor.karen.becker Rodney Habib on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rodneyhabib Follow @drkarenbecker on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/drkarenbecker/ Follow @RODNEYHABIB on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/RODNEYHABIB/ Follow @drkarenbecker on Twitter: https://twitter.com/drkarenbecker Follow @rodneyhabib on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rodneyhabib Rodney Habib on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXVR-WWoQ6J4kZNmPwdZkNQ/videos Resilience is a process that fluctuates over time, not a fixed trait by Cameron Duke Flynn, P. J., Bliese, P. D., Korsgaard, M. A., & Cannon, C. (2021). Tracking the Process of Resilience: How Emotional Stability and Experience Influence Exhaustion and Commitment Trajectories. Group & Organization Management, 46(4), 692–736. https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011211027676 Reynolds, E. (2021, August 23). Study Of Marching Band Shows That Resilience Is A Process, Not A Fixed Trait. Research Digest. https://digest.bps.org.uk/2021/08/23/study-of-marching-band-shows-that-resilience-is-a-process-not-a-fixed-trait/ Follow Curiosity Daily on your favorite podcast app to learn something new every day withCody Gough andAshley Hamer. Still curious? Get exclusive science shows, nature documentaries, and more real-life entertainment on discovery+! Go to https://discoveryplus.com/curiosity to start your 7-day free trial. discovery+ is currently only available for US subscribers. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Thomas Korsgaard skriver under et poetisk provinsielt alter ego på Facebook. I fem år har han holdt det hemmeligt, at han er Conny Kam Filtenborg - for nu hvor hemmeligheden er ude, er det ikke sikkert, at Conny kan leve videre. Korsgaard aflytter sammen med Sanne Cigale Benmouyal og Anders Lund Madsen programmets telefonsvarer og finder ud af, hvad lytterne bærer rundt på: En kvinde er blevet voldtaget og har ikke engang fortalt det til sin psykolog, en person afviser næsten alle telefonopkald på grund af telefonangst, og en kvinde skammer sig over sin ufaglærte mand. Ring med din hemmelighed på 28 54 40 00.
Mit "Tiere wie wir" hat die Harvard-Philosophin Christine M. Korsgaard ein interessantes Buch zur Tierethik vorgelegt, das im Jahr 2021 auf Deutsch erschienen ist. Dass wir Tieren gegenüber moralische Pflichten haben, begründet sie ausgerechnet mit Hilfe der moralischen Prinzipien von Immanuel Kant, der das eigentlich anders sah und für Tiere anscheinend nicht besonders viel übrig hatte. Eine Rezension
Hvad skete der egentlig for MTV og hvilken betydning har stationen haft for musikvideoen? I anledning af at det i år d. 1 august er 40 år siden musik-tv-stationen gik i luftet, så ser vi nærmere på den og dens status anno 2021. Daniel Cesar taler med Mathias Bonde Korsgaard musikvideoekspert og lektor i film- og medievidenskab ved Aarhus Universitet.
How a company treats employees is crucially important for employee wellness and performance. Did you know it also impacts how customers and other stakeholders feel about the company? Listen in as we breakdown new research around the PR implications of how employees are treated. Links: Steinbach, Kautz, & Korsgaard (2021) Treatment of Employees Matters! Article […] The post The PR Strategy of Employee Treatment appeared first on Workr Beeing | The Science Of Thriving Workplaces.
Introduction It cannot have escaped your attention that there is a small contingent of our nation that poses a threat to our way of life. They want us to stop farming our most prized delicacy on the grounds of their ‘moral concerns'. We must not let them push us around. As you well know, it has always been an important part of our culture. Why should we assume that this small group of radicals have got it right and that our ancestors have all been wrong? Think of all the memories we've shared when eating the meat around the table with our families. It is a wonderful thing. Secondly, I have yet to come across anyone who doesn't gain great satisfaction from the delicious taste of the meat. Whether it is in patties, ground mince or slices, it is enjoyed by billions every day. Imagine the backlash if we showed sympathy to the radicals! Think about all the businesses that rely on meat for their income. It would be political suicide. Finally, and most importantly, we must always remember the natural order of things. We are top of the food chain, and it is our right to exercise our dominion. Every test we have conducted on the creatures have proven them to be inferior, be it intelligence, strength, or a capacity to live what we'd all say is a fulfilling life. I know that you must feel the same; all I ask is for permission to deal with the radicals. Eating human meat should never be up for debate. Contents Part I. History Part II. Fellow Creatures Part III. Mere Instruments Part IV. Further Analysis and Discussion Links Carl Cohen, ‘Why Animals Have No Rights'. David DeGrazia, Animal Rights: A Very Short Introduction. Jonathan Safran Foer, Eating Animals. Lori Gruen, Entangled Empathy: An Alternative Ethic for Our Relationships with Animals. Christine M. Korsgaard, Fellow Creatures: Our Obligations to the Other Animals. Philip Lymbery, Farmageddon in Pictures: The True Cost of Cheap Meat. Mary Midgley, Animals and Why They Matter. Matthieu Ricard, A Plea for the Animals: The Moral, Philosophical, and Evolutionary Imperative to Treat All Beings with Compassion. Peter Singer, Animal Liberation.
Auch Menschen sind Tiere, lautet die provokante, aber philosophisch untermauerte These von Christine M. Korsgaard. Die Harvard-Professorin für Philosophie leitet daraus ein engagiertes Plädoyer gegen Massentierhaltung und Tierversuche ab. Rezension von Eva Karnofsky. Aus dem Englischen von Stefan Lorenzer C.H. Beck Verlag, 346 Seiten, 29,95 Euro ISBN 978-3-406-76545-2
Introduction It cannot have escaped your attention that there is a small contingent of our nation that poses a threat to our way of life. They want us to stop farming our most prized delicacy on the grounds of their ‘moral concerns'. We must not let them push us around. As you well know, it has always been an important part of our culture. Why should we assume that this small group of radicals have got it right and that our ancestors have all been wrong? Think of all the memories we've shared when eating the meat around the table with our families. It is a wonderful thing. Secondly, I have yet to come across anyone who doesn't gain great satisfaction from the delicious taste of the meat. Whether it is in patties, ground mince or slices, it is enjoyed by billions every day. Imagine the backlash if we showed sympathy to the radicals! Think about all the businesses that rely on meat for their income. It would be political suicide. Finally, and most importantly, we must always remember the natural order of things. We are top of the food chain, and it is our right to exercise our dominion. Every test we have conducted on the creatures have proven them to be inferior, be it intelligence, strength, or a capacity to live what we'd all say is a fulfilling life. I know that you must feel the same; all I ask is for permission to deal with the radicals. Eating human meat should never be up for debate. Contents Part I. History Part II. Fellow Creatures Part III. Mere Instruments Part IV. Further Analysis and Discussion Links Carl Cohen, ‘Why Animals Have No Rights'. David DeGrazia, Animal Rights: A Very Short Introduction. Jonathan Safran Foer, Eating Animals. Lori Gruen, Entangled Empathy: An Alternative Ethic for Our Relationships with Animals. Christine M. Korsgaard, Fellow Creatures: Our Obligations to the Other Animals. Philip Lymbery, Farmageddon in Pictures: The True Cost of Cheap Meat. Mary Midgley, Animals and Why They Matter. Matthieu Ricard, A Plea for the Animals: The Moral, Philosophical, and Evolutionary Imperative to Treat All Beings with Compassion. Peter Singer, Animal Liberation.
Introduction It cannot have escaped your attention that there is a small contingent of our nation that poses a threat to our way of life. They want us to stop farming our most prized delicacy on the grounds of their ‘moral concerns'. We must not let them push us around. As you well know, it has always been an important part of our culture. Why should we assume that this small group of radicals have got it right and that our ancestors have all been wrong? Think of all the memories we've shared when eating the meat around the table with our families. It is a wonderful thing. Secondly, I have yet to come across anyone who doesn't gain great satisfaction from the delicious taste of the meat. Whether it is in patties, ground mince or slices, it is enjoyed by billions every day. Imagine the backlash if we showed sympathy to the radicals! Think about all the businesses that rely on meat for their income. It would be political suicide. Finally, and most importantly, we must always remember the natural order of things. We are top of the food chain, and it is our right to exercise our dominion. Every test we have conducted on the creatures have proven them to be inferior, be it intelligence, strength, or a capacity to live what we'd all say is a fulfilling life. I know that you must feel the same; all I ask is for permission to deal with the radicals. Eating human meat should never be up for debate. Contents Part I. History Part II. Fellow Creatures Part III. Mere Instruments Part IV. Further Analysis and Discussion Links Carl Cohen, ‘Why Animals Have No Rights'. David DeGrazia, Animal Rights: A Very Short Introduction. Jonathan Safran Foer, Eating Animals. Lori Gruen, Entangled Empathy: An Alternative Ethic for Our Relationships with Animals. Christine M. Korsgaard, Fellow Creatures: Our Obligations to the Other Animals. Philip Lymbery, Farmageddon in Pictures: The True Cost of Cheap Meat. Mary Midgley, Animals and Why They Matter. Matthieu Ricard, A Plea for the Animals: The Moral, Philosophical, and Evolutionary Imperative to Treat All Beings with Compassion. Peter Singer, Animal Liberation.
Introduction It cannot have escaped your attention that there is a small contingent of our nation that poses a threat to our way of life. They want us to stop farming our most prized delicacy on the grounds of their ‘moral concerns'. We must not let them push us around. As you well know, it has always been an important part of our culture. Why should we assume that this small group of radicals have got it right and that our ancestors have all been wrong? Think of all the memories we've shared when eating the meat around the table with our families. It is a wonderful thing. Secondly, I have yet to come across anyone who doesn't gain great satisfaction from the delicious taste of the meat. Whether it is in patties, ground mince or slices, it is enjoyed by billions every day. Imagine the backlash if we showed sympathy to the radicals! Think about all the businesses that rely on meat for their income. It would be political suicide. Finally, and most importantly, we must always remember the natural order of things. We are top of the food chain, and it is our right to exercise our dominion. Every test we have conducted on the creatures have proven them to be inferior, be it intelligence, strength, or a capacity to live what we'd all say is a fulfilling life. I know that you must feel the same; all I ask is for permission to deal with the radicals. Eating human meat should never be up for debate. Contents Part I. History Part II. Fellow Creatures Part III. Mere Instruments Part IV. Further Analysis and Discussion Links Carl Cohen, ‘Why Animals Have No Rights'. David DeGrazia, Animal Rights: A Very Short Introduction. Jonathan Safran Foer, Eating Animals. Lori Gruen, Entangled Empathy: An Alternative Ethic for Our Relationships with Animals. Christine M. Korsgaard, Fellow Creatures: Our Obligations to the Other Animals. Philip Lymbery, Farmageddon in Pictures: The True Cost of Cheap Meat. Mary Midgley, Animals and Why They Matter. Matthieu Ricard, A Plea for the Animals: The Moral, Philosophical, and Evolutionary Imperative to Treat All Beings with Compassion. Peter Singer, Animal Liberation.
In this episode, we discuss Harry Frankfurt's landmark 1969 paper, "Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility Your support helps me make more videos and podcasts: Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/jordanmyers Twitter: @JordanCMyers Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCD1RiH1j-M6C59z1upPXkWw?disable_polymer=true That's BS Website: https://thatsbs.fireside.fm/ Contact me thatsbspodcast@gmail.com Check out my philosophy graduate school podcast here: https://platoscave.fireside.fm/ Above all, Thanks for watching.
In this episode, we discuss Harry Frankfurt's landmark 1969 paper, "Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility Your support helps me make more videos and podcasts: Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/jordanmyers Twitter: @JordanCMyers Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCD1RiH1j-M6C59z1upPXkWw?disable_polymer=true That's BS Website: https://thatsbs.fireside.fm/ Contact me thatsbspodcast@gmail.com Check out my philosophy graduate school podcast here: https://platoscave.fireside.fm/ Above all, Thanks for watching.
En lugar del énfasis utilitarista en el dolor y el placer, Korsgaard piensa en la vida animal como el origen mismo de toda forma de valor. Una mirada distinta al lugar de los animales en la reflexión ética.
Sein und Streit - Das Philosophiemagazin - Deutschlandfunk Kultur
Die US-amerikanische Moralphilosophin Christine M. Korsgaard ist der Überzeugung, dass wir keine Tiere zum Fleischkonsum halten sollten. Für ihre eigenen Katzen allerdings macht sie Ausnahmen. Von Florian Werner www.deutschlandfunkkultur.de, Sein und Streit Hören bis: 19.01.2038 04:14 Direkter Link zur Audiodatei
In this episode, we discuss Frankfurt's famous paper, Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person. Your support helps me make more videos and podcasts: Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/jordanmyers Twitter: @JordanCMyers Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCD1RiH1j-M6C59z1upPXkWw?disable_polymer=true That's BS Website: https://thatsbs.fireside.fm/ Contact me thatsbspodcast@gmail.com Check out my philosophy graduate school podcast here: https://platoscave.fireside.fm/ Above all, Thanks for watching.
In this episode, we discuss Frankfurt's famous paper, Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person. Your support helps me make more videos and podcasts: Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/jordanmyers Twitter: @JordanCMyers Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCD1RiH1j-M6C59z1upPXkWw?disable_polymer=true That's BS Website: https://thatsbs.fireside.fm/ Contact me thatsbspodcast@gmail.com Check out my philosophy graduate school podcast here: https://platoscave.fireside.fm/ Above all, Thanks for watching.
dgutspodcast.com https://soundcloud.com/usailorwillis/ Facebook: Don't Give Up The Ship Podcast Instagram: @dgutspodcast Email: dontgiveuptheshippodcast@gmail.com Store: dgutspodcast.com/shop Reddit: r/dgutspodcast u/dgutspodcast Weekly podcast for the professional and leadership development of junior enlisted Sailors and military members. Foundations No. 2 – Building Trust Second installment of the Foundations series presenting formal leadership development topics to educate, with Chief Andrew. This episode's topic is “Building Trust”. Contact us! (dontgiveuptheshippodcast@gmail.com) References: Serrat, O. (2017) Building Trust in the Workplace. In: Knowledge Solutions Springer, Singapore. Https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0983-9_69 Kramer 1999: 6 types of Trust Drescher, M. A., Korsgaard, M. A., Welpe, I. M., Picot, A., & Wigand, R. T. (2014). The dynamics of shared leadership: Building trust and enhancing performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(5), 771-783. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036474 Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709-734. DISCLAIMER: The views expressed by the speaker (DGUTS) and all guests are not those of the Department of Defense, United States Navy or any other government
Bearing with Strangers: Arendt, Education and the Politics of Inclusion (Routledge, 2018) looks at inclusion in education in a new way. By introducing the notion of the instrumental fallacy, it shows how this is not only an inherent feature of inclusive education policies, but also omnipresent in modern educational policy. It engages with schooling through an Arendtian framework, namely as a practice with the aim of mediating between generations. It outlines a didactic and pedagogical theory that presents inclusion not as an aim for education, but as a constitutive feature of the activity of schooling. Drawing on the work of Hannah Arendt, the book offers a novel and critical perspective on inclusive education, as well as a contribution to a growing literature re-engaging didactic and pedagogical conceptions of teaching and the role of the teacher. Schooling is understood as a process of opening the world to the young and of opening the world to the renewal that the new generations offer. The activity of schooling offers the possibility of becoming attentive towards what is common while learning to bear with that which is strange and those who are strangers. The book points to valuable metaphors and ideas - referred to in the book as 'pearls' - that speak to the heart of what schooling and teaching concerns, such as exemplarity, judgement, and enlarged thought. Kai Wortman is a PhD candidate at the Institute of Education, University of Tübingen, interested in philosophy of education. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/intellectual-history
Bearing with Strangers: Arendt, Education and the Politics of Inclusion (Routledge, 2018) looks at inclusion in education in a new way. By introducing the notion of the instrumental fallacy, it shows how this is not only an inherent feature of inclusive education policies, but also omnipresent in modern educational policy. It engages with schooling through an Arendtian framework, namely as a practice with the aim of mediating between generations. It outlines a didactic and pedagogical theory that presents inclusion not as an aim for education, but as a constitutive feature of the activity of schooling. Drawing on the work of Hannah Arendt, the book offers a novel and critical perspective on inclusive education, as well as a contribution to a growing literature re-engaging didactic and pedagogical conceptions of teaching and the role of the teacher. Schooling is understood as a process of opening the world to the young and of opening the world to the renewal that the new generations offer. The activity of schooling offers the possibility of becoming attentive towards what is common while learning to bear with that which is strange and those who are strangers. The book points to valuable metaphors and ideas - referred to in the book as 'pearls' - that speak to the heart of what schooling and teaching concerns, such as exemplarity, judgement, and enlarged thought. Kai Wortman is a PhD candidate at the Institute of Education, University of Tübingen, interested in philosophy of education. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network
Bearing with Strangers: Arendt, Education and the Politics of Inclusion (Routledge, 2018) looks at inclusion in education in a new way. By introducing the notion of the instrumental fallacy, it shows how this is not only an inherent feature of inclusive education policies, but also omnipresent in modern educational policy. It engages with schooling through an Arendtian framework, namely as a practice with the aim of mediating between generations. It outlines a didactic and pedagogical theory that presents inclusion not as an aim for education, but as a constitutive feature of the activity of schooling. Drawing on the work of Hannah Arendt, the book offers a novel and critical perspective on inclusive education, as well as a contribution to a growing literature re-engaging didactic and pedagogical conceptions of teaching and the role of the teacher. Schooling is understood as a process of opening the world to the young and of opening the world to the renewal that the new generations offer. The activity of schooling offers the possibility of becoming attentive towards what is common while learning to bear with that which is strange and those who are strangers. The book points to valuable metaphors and ideas - referred to in the book as 'pearls' - that speak to the heart of what schooling and teaching concerns, such as exemplarity, judgement, and enlarged thought. Kai Wortman is a PhD candidate at the Institute of Education, University of Tübingen, interested in philosophy of education. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/public-policy
Bearing with Strangers: Arendt, Education and the Politics of Inclusion (Routledge, 2018) looks at inclusion in education in a new way. By introducing the notion of the instrumental fallacy, it shows how this is not only an inherent feature of inclusive education policies, but also omnipresent in modern educational policy. It engages with schooling through an Arendtian framework, namely as a practice with the aim of mediating between generations. It outlines a didactic and pedagogical theory that presents inclusion not as an aim for education, but as a constitutive feature of the activity of schooling. Drawing on the work of Hannah Arendt, the book offers a novel and critical perspective on inclusive education, as well as a contribution to a growing literature re-engaging didactic and pedagogical conceptions of teaching and the role of the teacher. Schooling is understood as a process of opening the world to the young and of opening the world to the renewal that the new generations offer. The activity of schooling offers the possibility of becoming attentive towards what is common while learning to bear with that which is strange and those who are strangers. The book points to valuable metaphors and ideas - referred to in the book as 'pearls' - that speak to the heart of what schooling and teaching concerns, such as exemplarity, judgement, and enlarged thought. Kai Wortman is a PhD candidate at the Institute of Education, University of Tübingen, interested in philosophy of education. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/education
Bearing with Strangers: Arendt, Education and the Politics of Inclusion (Routledge, 2018) looks at inclusion in education in a new way. By introducing the notion of the instrumental fallacy, it shows how this is not only an inherent feature of inclusive education policies, but also omnipresent in modern educational policy. It engages with schooling through an Arendtian framework, namely as a practice with the aim of mediating between generations. It outlines a didactic and pedagogical theory that presents inclusion not as an aim for education, but as a constitutive feature of the activity of schooling. Drawing on the work of Hannah Arendt, the book offers a novel and critical perspective on inclusive education, as well as a contribution to a growing literature re-engaging didactic and pedagogical conceptions of teaching and the role of the teacher. Schooling is understood as a process of opening the world to the young and of opening the world to the renewal that the new generations offer. The activity of schooling offers the possibility of becoming attentive towards what is common while learning to bear with that which is strange and those who are strangers. The book points to valuable metaphors and ideas - referred to in the book as 'pearls' - that speak to the heart of what schooling and teaching concerns, such as exemplarity, judgement, and enlarged thought. Kai Wortman is a PhD candidate at the Institute of Education, University of Tübingen, interested in philosophy of education. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/critical-theory
In this episode, we discuss Gary Watson's paper on Intelligible Moral Demand being a way to view the debate on moral responsibility. That paper is his Responsibility and the Limits of Evil: Variations on a Strawsonian Theme. Your support helps me make more videos and podcasts: Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/jordanmyers Twitter: @JordanCMyers Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCD1RiH1j-M6C59z1upPXkWw?disable_polymer=true That's BS Website: https://thatsbs.fireside.fm/ Contact me thatsbspodcast@gmail.com Check out my philosophy graduate school podcast here: https://platoscave.fireside.fm/ Above all, Thanks for watching.
In this episode, we discuss Gary Watson's paper on Intelligible Moral Demand being a way to view the debate on moral responsibility. That paper is his Responsibility and the Limits of Evil: Variations on a Strawsonian Theme. Your support helps me make more videos and podcasts: Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/jordanmyers Twitter: @JordanCMyers Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCD1RiH1j-M6C59z1upPXkWw?disable_polymer=true That's BS Website: https://thatsbs.fireside.fm/ Contact me thatsbspodcast@gmail.com Check out my philosophy graduate school podcast here: https://platoscave.fireside.fm/ Above all, Thanks for watching.
In this episode, we go deep into the weeds of PF Strawson's Freedom and Resentment. PDF:http://www.filosofia.unimi.it/zucchi/NuoviFile/FreedomandResentment.pdf Your support helps me make more videos and podcasts: Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/jordanmyers Twitter: @JordanCMyers Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCD1RiH1j-M6C59z1upPXkWw?disable_polymer=true That's BS Website: https://thatsbs.fireside.fm/ Contact me thatsbspodcast@gmail.com Check out my philosophy graduate school podcast here: https://platoscave.fireside.fm/ Above all, Thanks for watching.
In this episode, we go deep into the weeds of PF Strawson's Freedom and Resentment. PDF:http://www.filosofia.unimi.it/zucchi/NuoviFile/FreedomandResentment.pdf Your support helps me make more videos and podcasts: Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/jordanmyers Twitter: @JordanCMyers Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCD1RiH1j-M6C59z1upPXkWw?disable_polymer=true That's BS Website: https://thatsbs.fireside.fm/ Contact me thatsbspodcast@gmail.com Check out my philosophy graduate school podcast here: https://platoscave.fireside.fm/ Above all, Thanks for watching.
In this episode, we discuss Galen Strawson's "The Impossibility of Moral Responsibility" and Derk Pereboom's Four Case Argument against compatibilism. Strawson: http://static1.squarespace.com/static/551587e0e4b0ce927f09707f/t/57b5d14de58c624a6d3a5e99/1471533403405/Strawson%2C+The+Impossibility+of+Moral+Responsibility.pdf Pereboom: https://philosophicaldisquisitions.blogspot.com/2015/01/perebooms-four-case-argument-against.html Your support helps me make more videos and podcasts: Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/jordanmyers Twitter: @JordanCMyers Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCD1RiH1j-M6C59z1upPXkWw?disable_polymer=true That's BS Website: https://thatsbs.fireside.fm/ Contact me thatsbspodcast@gmail.com Check out my philosophy graduate school podcast here: https://platoscave.fireside.fm/ Above all, Thanks for watching.
In this episode, we discuss Galen Strawson's "The Impossibility of Moral Responsibility" and Derk Pereboom's Four Case Argument against compatibilism. Strawson: http://static1.squarespace.com/static/551587e0e4b0ce927f09707f/t/57b5d14de58c624a6d3a5e99/1471533403405/Strawson%2C+The+Impossibility+of+Moral+Responsibility.pdf Pereboom: https://philosophicaldisquisitions.blogspot.com/2015/01/perebooms-four-case-argument-against.html Your support helps me make more videos and podcasts: Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/jordanmyers Twitter: @JordanCMyers Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCD1RiH1j-M6C59z1upPXkWw?disable_polymer=true That's BS Website: https://thatsbs.fireside.fm/ Contact me thatsbspodcast@gmail.com Check out my philosophy graduate school podcast here: https://platoscave.fireside.fm/ Above all, Thanks for watching.
Klimaforandringer kan påvirke den finansielle stabilitet, og Nationalbanken har derfor foretaget en klimastresstest af bankerne.Økonom Søren Korsgaard er en af hovedkræfterne stresstesten, og han fortæller her om konklusionerne.
Dagens gæst er Mette Korsgaard, forfatter og instruktør, og sammen med vicevært Jens Folmer Jepsen gennemgår hun dagens mest tankevækkende nyheder.
From farm to fork, nearly one-third of produce and cooked food is being thrown away. And the culprits are to be found everywhere: among manufacturers and producers, throughout logistics, in stores and restaurants, and among consumers, such as you and I. This fairly recent development amounts to a staggering waste of use of land, water, energy and calories. As a part of this year’s digital edition of the EatArt festival, Love Zero Waste is dedicating an episode of the podcast to dive into solutions helping to end waste throughout food production. Guests on the show are some of the most interesting initiatives out there, aiming to drastically reduce food waste and help save the planet. Listen to Ebbe Korsgaard, of Beyond Coffee, Estefania Coral Andrade of Vågen zero waste shop, and Anders Burman of Östersund municipality share their insights on food production, logistics, circular loops, and much more! Sources Farm to Fork strategy, the European Commission, https://ec.europa.eu/food/sites/food/files/safety/docs/f2f_action-plan_2020_strategy-info_en.pdf Eat Art Festival, https://www.eatart.se/ Vågen, https://www.vagenbutik.se/ Östersund Municipality, https://www.ostersund.se/ Beyond Coffee, http://www.beyondcoffee.eu/ Beyond the Bean: Turning Coffee Grounds Into Protein Powder, https://www.haaretz.com/world-news/impact-journalism-day-2018/MAGAZINE-beyond-the-bean-turning-coffee-grounds-into-protein-powder-1.6159229 Mycelium, Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mycelium#:~:text=Mycelium%20is%20the%20vegetative%20part,soil%20and%20many%20other%20substrates. Food Loss and Food Waste, FAO, http://www.fao.org/food-loss-and-food-waste/en/ Credits Idea, production and editing: The Good Tribe, www.thegoodtribe.com and Circulous, www.circulous.biz Hosts: Evelina Lundqvist and Malin Leth Jingle: Merlinn Sound, www.merlinnsound.com Initiators the Love Zero Waste community: Evelina Lundqvist and Alexandra Poetz
Rosa fortæller sine egne me-too oplevelser og taler med filmdokumentarist Mette Korsgaard som måtte opgive at lave en film om den manglende ligestilling på billedkunstscenen på grund af tavshed hos de medvirkende billedkunstnere. Korsgaard fortæller om den research hun har lavet om den ubevidste kønsbias og som hun opdagede også var hos hende selv, i hendes familie, og hos hendes mand som er vært på DR programmet Deadline. En opdagelse som resulterede i dokumentarfilmen ‘Min uimodståelige mand'.
Det här är det tredje avsnittet i en specialserie om Covid-19 och Koster. Serien innehåller ett antal avsnitt med olika perspektiv på hur viruset har påverkat livet på ön, eller alla de som inte har kunnat besöka sitt älskade Koster. I det här avsnittet pratar jag med Truls Korsgaard. Truls är Senior rådgivare på Direktoratet för e-helse och Senior rådgivare för Helsedirektoratet, och han är en av dem som jag haft förmånen att lärt känna på Koster. Avsnittet är inspelat över telefon, där Truls är i Norge och jag sitter på en klippa på Silletången på Nordkoster. Säg gärna hej till oss i sociala medier, sök på Kosterhavets Ekobod på Instagram, Facebook, Twitter eller TikTok. Vi finns där.
In this episode, I speak with Ben Burgis for a second time about free will compatiblism in a deterministic world. We speak about the metaphysics of free will and determinism, and what should constitude ground for moral responsibility. We also discuss my grad school writing sample and Christine Korsgaard's work. Here's any links you'll need to dive deeper: https://twitter.com/BenBurgis https://www.amazon.com/Give-Them-Argument-Logic-Left/dp/1789042100/ https://www.jstor.org/stable/2214250 https://soundcloud.com/user-761174326/41-jon-rosen-and-ben-burgis If you learned something from this episode, please consider supporting me here: https://www.patreon.com/jordanmyers Every dollar that comes in will go towards bettering the show or towards funding my Philosophy PhD. Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCtM5SXgyN93usom5vpRqlEQ/ You can also get in contact with me through Twitter: @JordanCMyers Or by emailing me at platoscavepodcast@gmail.com Plato's Cave is produced by a non-profit organization centered around public education on high-minded topics, Muckraker Media, which I co-founded. You can find out more by visiting muckrakermedia.org Special Guest: Ben Burgis.
In this episode, I discuss P.F. Strawson's landmark paper on moral responsibility, Freedom and Resentment, and its posing challenges towards those who believe free will and determinism have anything to do with responsibility. Here's any links you'll need to dive deeper: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/freewill/ https://letter.wiki/conversation/135 https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/determinism-causal/ https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-responsibility/ Strawson, Galen, 1994. “The Impossibility of Moral Responsibility,” Philosophical Studies, 75: 5–24. Strawson, Galen, 1986. Freedom and Belief, New York: Oxford University Press. Strawson, P. F., 1980. “Reply to Ayer and Bennett,” in van Stratten 1980. Strawson, P. F., 1962. “Freedom and Resentment,” Proceedings of the British Academy, 48: 1–25. Reprinted in Fischer and Ravizza, 1993. If you leanred something from this episode, please consider supporting me here: https://www.patreon.com/jordanmyers Every dollar that comes in will go towards bettering the show or towards funding my Philosophy PhD. Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCtM5SXgyN93usom5vpRqlEQ/ You can also get in contact with me through Twitter: @JordanCMyers Or by emailing me at platoscavepodcast@gmail.com
I denne episode sætter Ole og Katrine tænderne i Danmarkshistoriens mest ikoniske digitale produkt, MobilePay. Vi interviewer nemlig ”Mr. MobilePay”, Rasmus Korsgaard. Historien starter i 2014, hvor projektlederen Rasmus får stukket en powerpoint i hånden med en meget vag ide – og resten må I lytte til
Sidste år skete der det, der bare ikke måtte ske. Poul Nesgaard havde brugt hele december på at lave ét godt juleprogram, der skulle sendes juleaftensdag. Men udsendelsen blev sat for sent på, og alt gik i vasken på grund af en intern fejl. Derfor har DR givet Poul Nesgaard lov til at fortsætte udviklingen for åben mikrofon frem mod juleaften. Poul stoler ikke længere på DR's algoritmer og sætter i stedet i år sin lid til sine to medværter og en ny, intelligent superpult, der måske kan redde julen.
P.F. Strawson's landmark paper on moral responsibility, Freedom and Resentment, poses challenges towards those who believe free will and determinism have anything to do with responsibility. SHOW NOTES: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/freewill/ https://letter.wiki/conversation/135 https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/determinism-causal/ https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-responsibility/ Strawson, Galen, 1994. “The Impossibility of Moral Responsibility,” Philosophical Studies, 75: 5–24. Strawson, Galen, 1986. Freedom and Belief, New York: Oxford University Press. Strawson, P. F., 1980. “Reply to Ayer and Bennett,” in van Stratten 1980. Strawson, P. F., 1962. “Freedom and Resentment,” Proceedings of the British Academy, 48: 1–25. Reprinted in Fischer and Ravizza, 1993. We also have a Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCD1RiH1j-M6C59z1upPXkWw?disable_polymer=true Your support helps me make more videos and podcasts: Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/thatsbs _(We have rewards for supporters like bonus episodes & videos) _ Visit our Website: https://thatsbs.fireside.fm/ Share our conversation with a friend (or enemy) and help us get our name out. We record these conversation because we can't think of a more important way to expose bad ideas and promote good ones. Plus we're bored a lot and don't have that many friends. Help us keep doing what we're doing. Contact us --- thatsbspodcast@gmail.com Twitter: @ThatsBSPodcast Above all, Thanks for watching.
P.F. Strawson's landmark paper on moral responsibility, Freedom and Resentment, poses challenges towards those who believe free will and determinism have anything to do with responsibility. SHOW NOTES: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/freewill/ https://letter.wiki/conversation/135 https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/determinism-causal/ https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-responsibility/ Strawson, Galen, 1994. “The Impossibility of Moral Responsibility,” Philosophical Studies, 75: 5–24. Strawson, Galen, 1986. Freedom and Belief, New York: Oxford University Press. Strawson, P. F., 1980. “Reply to Ayer and Bennett,” in van Stratten 1980. Strawson, P. F., 1962. “Freedom and Resentment,” Proceedings of the British Academy, 48: 1–25. Reprinted in Fischer and Ravizza, 1993. We also have a Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCD1RiH1j-M6C59z1upPXkWw?disable_polymer=true Your support helps me make more videos and podcasts: Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/thatsbs _(We have rewards for supporters like bonus episodes & videos) _ Visit our Website: https://thatsbs.fireside.fm/ Share our conversation with a friend (or enemy) and help us get our name out. We record these conversation because we can't think of a more important way to expose bad ideas and promote good ones. Plus we're bored a lot and don't have that many friends. Help us keep doing what we're doing. Contact us --- thatsbspodcast@gmail.com Twitter: @ThatsBSPodcast Above all, Thanks for watching.
I dette afsnit af "Sådan gjorde jeg" besøger Trine Askholm forfatter, journalist og dokumentarist Mette Korsgaard til en snak om mænd og kvinder i medierne, tankerne bag filmen "Min uimodståelige mand" og kønsorienteret børneopdragelse.
Hvordan kan man bruge mekanismerne bag freestylerap til at blive bedre til at tænke og arbejde kreativt. Det sætter den nye bog 'Aktivt Kreativ' skarpt på, og i den forbindelse fik Martin Blicher besøg i studiet af forfatterne bag bogen: freestylerapperen Pede B og psykolog Mads Korsgaard til en snak og freestylerap om bogen.
Vi er alle mandschauvinister. Sådan siger Mette Korsgaard, der har skrevet debatbogen "Min uimodståelige mand". Og selv om du måske ikke mener, du er det, kommer du måske til at ændre mening, hvis du læser bogen. Mød Mette Korsgaard i Bogselskabet - hvor hun fortæller, at der er forskning, der viser, at der ikke er synderlig forskel på drenge og piger fra fødslen, men at det er vores måde at behandle de to køn forskelligt, der skaber forskellen. Vært: Anne Glad.
Thomas Kuhn upset both scientists and philosophers of science when he argued that transitions from one scientific framework (or “paradigm”) to another were irrational: the change was like a religious conversion experience rather than a reasoned shift from one theory to another based on the best evidence. But even if one disagrees with Kuhn, how can this change be shown to be rational? More generally, how can transitions from one set of normative standards to another be rational, given that there is no neutral position from which to criticize one’s own normative standards? In Creatively Undecided: Toward a History and Philosophy of Scientific Agency (University of Chicago Press, 2017), Menachem Fisch takes up this challenge, defending an account of framework change which accepts that we cannot be self-critical of our own standards, but we can be destabilized by external criticism. Some of those who are “ambivalated” in this way creatively attempt to tackle their ambivalence by developing hybrid theories that provide others in a scientific community with a means to critically assess their frameworks and develop new ones. Fisch, who is Professor of History and Philosophy of Science at Tel Aviv University, draws on work from Korsgaard, Friedman, Galison, McDowell and others in a rich discussion of the dynamics of normativity in science, illustrated with a case study of debates on the foundations of algebra in the 1830s. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Thomas Kuhn upset both scientists and philosophers of science when he argued that transitions from one scientific framework (or “paradigm”) to another were irrational: the change was like a religious conversion experience rather than a reasoned shift from one theory to another based on the best evidence. But even if one disagrees with Kuhn, how can this change be shown to be rational? More generally, how can transitions from one set of normative standards to another be rational, given that there is no neutral position from which to criticize one’s own normative standards? In Creatively Undecided: Toward a History and Philosophy of Scientific Agency (University of Chicago Press, 2017), Menachem Fisch takes up this challenge, defending an account of framework change which accepts that we cannot be self-critical of our own standards, but we can be destabilized by external criticism. Some of those who are “ambivalated” in this way creatively attempt to tackle their ambivalence by developing hybrid theories that provide others in a scientific community with a means to critically assess their frameworks and develop new ones. Fisch, who is Professor of History and Philosophy of Science at Tel Aviv University, draws on work from Korsgaard, Friedman, Galison, McDowell and others in a rich discussion of the dynamics of normativity in science, illustrated with a case study of debates on the foundations of algebra in the 1830s. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Thomas Kuhn upset both scientists and philosophers of science when he argued that transitions from one scientific framework (or “paradigm”) to another were irrational: the change was like a religious conversion experience rather than a reasoned shift from one theory to another based on the best evidence. But even if one disagrees with Kuhn, how can this change be shown to be rational? More generally, how can transitions from one set of normative standards to another be rational, given that there is no neutral position from which to criticize one’s own normative standards? In Creatively Undecided: Toward a History and Philosophy of Scientific Agency (University of Chicago Press, 2017), Menachem Fisch takes up this challenge, defending an account of framework change which accepts that we cannot be self-critical of our own standards, but we can be destabilized by external criticism. Some of those who are “ambivalated” in this way creatively attempt to tackle their ambivalence by developing hybrid theories that provide others in a scientific community with a means to critically assess their frameworks and develop new ones. Fisch, who is Professor of History and Philosophy of Science at Tel Aviv University, draws on work from Korsgaard, Friedman, Galison, McDowell and others in a rich discussion of the dynamics of normativity in science, illustrated with a case study of debates on the foundations of algebra in the 1830s. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Thomas Kuhn upset both scientists and philosophers of science when he argued that transitions from one scientific framework (or “paradigm”) to another were irrational: the change was like a religious conversion experience rather than a reasoned shift from one theory to another based on the best evidence. But even if one disagrees with Kuhn, how can this change be shown to be rational? More generally, how can transitions from one set of normative standards to another be rational, given that there is no neutral position from which to criticize one’s own normative standards? In Creatively Undecided: Toward a History and Philosophy of Scientific Agency (University of Chicago Press, 2017), Menachem Fisch takes up this challenge, defending an account of framework change which accepts that we cannot be self-critical of our own standards, but we can be destabilized by external criticism. Some of those who are “ambivalated” in this way creatively attempt to tackle their ambivalence by developing hybrid theories that provide others in a scientific community with a means to critically assess their frameworks and develop new ones. Fisch, who is Professor of History and Philosophy of Science at Tel Aviv University, draws on work from Korsgaard, Friedman, Galison, McDowell and others in a rich discussion of the dynamics of normativity in science, illustrated with a case study of debates on the foundations of algebra in the 1830s. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Jeg har forfatter og indehaver af Skriveværkstedet Heidi Korsgaard inde til en samtale om at skrive bøger. Heidi har 11 bøger på samvittigheden - mest indenfor ghostwriter og true life fortællinger - og har også skrevet 'Fra bogdrøm til bestseller' med Mette de Fine Licht. Heidi startede som redaktør på et forlag, hvor hun pludselig fik til opgave at skrive en bog på seks uger. Det var intenst og hårdt, og hun anbefaler bestemt, at man har mere tid, men hun blev bidt af skrive og nysgerrig efter, hvordan man kommer i mål med sin bog. Hør samtalen om den 'gode' bog, om skrivefællesskaber, om at dygtiggøre sig og at lige lave det ekstra arbejde, der skal til, for at prøve at undgå afslag hos forlag, der modtager flere manuskripter end nogensinde. Hun råder folk til at skrive den bog, man selv mangler, at gøre plads til fordybelsen og at huske at det skal være sjovt at skrive.
Morten Timmermann Korsgaard (phd.-studerende), Dirk Michel-Schertges (lektor) og Kirsten Hyldgaard (ph.d., lektor) giver hver deres bud på et svar. Korsgaard kommer bl.a. ind på begreber fra Hannah Arendts tænkning (Arbejde, Forestilling, Handling). Michel-Schertges snakker bl.a. om, at store værker er vigtige for den demokratiske proces og ender med at pointere, at vi ikke skal spørge om, hvorfor vi skal læse klassikere, men i stedet bør spørge: Hvorfor (overhovedet) læse det andet? Hyldgaard giver en mættet og spændende (som altid) udlægning af vigtigheden af de store værker i forhold til at skabe (fundamentale) nybrud indenfor forskningen. EN TIME I GODT SELSKAB.
Interview med Ove Korsgaard om demokrati
Many philosophers argue in favour of the welfare of animals because of their capacity for feeling pain. Harvard philosopher Christine Korsgaard is unusual in using Kantian arguments to defend the status of animals as ends in themselves. She discusses her approach with Nigel Warburton in this episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast.
Monopolet: Sangerinde Annette Heick Bestyrelsesformand Asger Aamund Håndboldspiller og Special Guest Star Joachim Boldsen Dilemmaer: 1. Skal Anne Sophie tage med til sin ekskærestes bryllup 2. Den konfliktsky ved ikke om hun skal sladre om sin kollega der fusker med sin flekstid. 3. Skal Henrik fælde sin ældste søns livstræ for at få plads til et havetelt til hans yngste søns konfirmationsfest. 4. Ida kan ikke lide hendes stedfar og har oven i købet opdaget at han skriver med andre kvinder på nettet 5. Andreas kan ikke finde ud af om hans søns skal hedde Korsgaard eller Laban til mellemnavn. 6. Marie vil aflive sin kat uden at fortælle det til sin mand fordi hun HADER katten 7. Karin ved ikke om han skal pille det blå tapet med gule knager ned fra entreen fordi hans mand det er kæmpe fck fan hader de her brøndby farver 8. Jesper var i tvivl om han og vennerne skal dække den ekstra udgift for vennen der er sprunget fra skiferien 9. Lone ved ikke om hun skal sende gaverne tilbage fra hendes barns far 10. Mathias har fået Slash billetter i julegave af sin kæreste men vil helst have sin kammerat med til koncerten
© 2020-2025 Ivy Podcast Discovery LLC
