Podcasts about verres

Imperien? Diese Zeit ist doch lange vorbei. So haben vermutlich viele gedacht. Spätestens nach dem Zusammenbruch der Sowjetunion und dem Ende des Kalten Krieges schien das Zeitalter der Imperien und des Imperialismus endgültig Geschichte. Aber Staaten wie die USA oder China verfolgen schon seit Jahrzehnten eine imperialistische Handelspolitik. Sie bauen ihre Macht und ihren Einfluss in vielen Weltregionen aus. Staaten wie Russland machen auch nicht davor halt, ihr Territorium gewaltsam zu erweitern. Das wurde spätestens mit dem Angriffskrieg Russlands auf die Ukraine Anfang 2022 klar. Aber was bedeutet dieser Neo-Imperialismus für unsere Welt? Welchen historischen Vorbildern folgen Putin, Trump und Xi? Wann entwickelte sich das erste Imperium der Geschichte? Und warum sind das Persische Reich, das Imperium Romanum und das Mongolenreich am Ende doch untergegangen? Ein Podcast über vergangene und gegenwärtige Imperien und die Frage: war der Imperialismus wirklich jemals Geschichte? Gesprächspartner*innen: Mark C. Elliott Nadin Hée Ulrike von Hirschhausen Bernhard Linke Sönke Neitzel Literatur Asimov, Isaac (2017): Die Foundation-Trilogie. Axworthy, Michael (2014): A History of Iran: Empire of the Mind. Blank-Sangmeister, Ursula (1991): Valerius Maximus, Facta et dicta memorabilia: lateinisch/deutsch = Denkwürdige Taten und Worte. Blösel, Wolfgang (2015): Die römische Republik: Forum und Expansion. Cicero, Tullius M. (70 v. Chr): Reden gegen Verres. Lateinische Bibliothek des Landesbildungsservers Baden-Württemberg. Dabringhaus, Sabine (2009): Geschichte Chinas 1279 – 1949. Elliott, Mark C. (2009): Emperor Qianlong: Son of Heaven, Man of the World. Menzel, Ulrich (2024): Die Ordnung der Welt. Münkler, Herfried (2010): Imperium und Imperialismus. Docupedia-Zeitgeschichte. Neitzel, Sönke (2000): Weltmacht oder Untergang. Die Weltreichslehre im Zeitalter des Imperialismus. Nolte, Hans-Heinrich (2009): Weltgeschichte des 20. Jahrhunderts. Hawkins, Angus (2020): Benjamin Disraeli, Speech of the Right Hon. B. Disraeli, MP, at the Banquet of the National Union of Conservative and Constitutional Associations at the Crystal Palace, on Monday June 24, 1872. Heé, Nadin (2012): Imperiales Wissen und koloniale Gewalt. Japans Herrschaft in Taiwan 1895-1945. Hirschhausen von, Ulrike/ Leonhard, Jörn (2023): Empires: Eine globale Geschichte 1780-1920. Kennedy, Paul (1989): The Rise and Fall of Great Powers. Linke, Bernhard (2015): Die römische Republik von den Gracchen bis Sulla. Linke, Bernhard (2000): Untersuchungen zu den religiösen Rahmenbedingungen für Herrschaftslegitimation im archaischen Griechenland. Rollinger, Robert et al. (2014): Imperien und Reiche der Weltgeschichte. Epochenübergreifende und globalhistorische Vergleiche. Internetquellen https://millercenter.org/the-presidency/presidential-speeches/september-5-1901-speech-buffalo-new-york https://www.civiced.org/quotations-about-democracy https://zeitgeschichte-digital.de/doks/frontdoor/deliver/index/docId/585/file/docupedia_muenkler_imperium_v1_de_2010.pdf https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/tag/imperialism https://www.tordesillas.net/descubre-tordesillas/historia/el-tratado-de-tordesillas https://www.geo.de/wissen/weltgeschichte/mongolisches-reich--dschingis-khan-legte-die-saat-fuer-innere-machtkaempfe-35166740.html https://www.projekt-gutenberg.org/cicero/verres/chap007.html http://academics.wellesley.edu/Polisci/wj/China/208/READINGS/qianlong.html https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA399126.pdf

Ecoutez Vous allez en entendre parler avec Tom Lefevre du 26 mars 2025.Distribué par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

Ecoutez Vous allez en entendre parler avec Tom Lefevre du 26 mars 2025.Distribué par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

Les 4 verres de vin by Rav David Touitou

Pour la sixième fois de son histoire, Duralex s'est retrouvée en 2024 en redressement judiciaire. Cette fois-ci, les salariés eux-mêmes ont proposé de reprendre l'entreprise, sous la forme d'une Scop, une coopérative. Les 226 emplois ont été conservés. La mutation de l'entreprise est toutefois un défi économique, dans une France qui peine à faire face à la désindustrialisation. RFI a suivi les salariés de la Scop Duralex pendant près de six mois.   « Les verres Duralex rebondissent en coopérative », un Grand reportage de Justine Fontaine, réalisé par Pauline Leduc.En images

A l'occasion de la publication des résultats annuels du groupe, Paul du Saillant, directeur général délégué d'EssilorLuxottica, leader mondial franco-italien de l'optique, était l'invité de l'émission Ecorama du 25 février 2025, présentée par David Jacquot sur Boursorama.com. Hébergé par Audion. Visitez https://www.audion.fm/fr/privacy-policy pour plus d'informations.

Découvrez avec GLOUGLOU ce que le vin dit de Jules Gaubert-Turpin

C’est encore le party à la FTQ Construction. Tarifs: la date du 1er février tient toujours. Un premier revers pour Donald Trump. Annonce de la Banque du Canada et de la FED. Michel Barrette espère percer le mystère de JFK. Le CH perd sa partie. Tout savoir en quelques minutes avec Alexandre Dubé, Isabelle Perron et Mario Dumont.Pour de l'information concernant l'utilisation de vos données personnelles - https://omnystudio.com/policies/listener/fr

C’est encore le party à la FTQ Construction. Tarifs: la date du 1er février tient toujours. Un premier revers pour Donald Trump. Annonce de la Banque du Canada et de la FED. Michel Barrette espère percer le mystère de JFK. Le CH perd sa partie. Tout savoir en quelques minutes avec Alexandre Dubé, Isabelle Perron et Mario Dumont.Pour de l'information concernant l'utilisation de vos données personnelles - https://omnystudio.com/policies/listener/fr

On aborde les différentes étapes de l'apprentissage de l'utilisation des couverts et des ustensiles, ainsi que des recommandations pratiques pour les parents et les éducatrices. APERÇU DU CONTENU Quand et comment présenter la cuillère, la fourchette, le couteau, les verres et les pailles ? Les attentes en autonomie par âge ? Les erreurs courantes en liées à l'introduction des couverts Idées d'activités de motricité fine pour promouvoir l'autonomie avec les outils Et plus Tout ça de la perspective de l'ergothérapie

4 verres de vin pour annoncer la Gueoula (selon le Rabbi) by Rav David Touitou

Où l'on parle de Duralex, mais aussi d'assiettes creuses.

Aux "Grosses Têtes", Pierre Benichou avait toujours deux verres d'eau : mais pourquoi ? Retrouvez tous les jours le meilleur des Grosses Têtes en podcast sur RTL.fr et l'application RTL.

This Day in Legal History: Cicero is BornOn January 3, 106 BC, Marcus Tullius Cicero, one of ancient Rome's most influential lawyers, orators, and statesmen, was born in Arpinum, a small town southeast of Rome. Cicero's life and work laid the foundations for modern legal and political thought, intertwining law, philosophy, and rhetoric. As a novus homo (the first in his family to achieve senatorial rank), Cicero rose through the Roman cursus honorum, eventually serving as consul in 63 BC. His tenure is most remembered for his decisive action in quelling the Catiline Conspiracy, a plot to overthrow the Republic.Cicero's legal career was marked by his exceptional eloquence and emphasis on justice. His speeches, such as those in defense of Sextus Roscius and against Verres, revealed his dedication to exposing corruption and advocating for fairness. Beyond his courtroom success, Cicero's philosophical treatises, including De Legibus (On the Laws), explored the nature of justice and the rule of law. His writings profoundly influenced thinkers of the Enlightenment and modern legal systems.In one of his letters, Cicero wrote to his friend – one of his most famous quotes:“What is morally wrong can never be advantageous, even if it enables you to rule the world.”This succinct insight captures his belief in the universality of law as a moral and societal cornerstone.Cicero's life was not without turmoil. His opposition to Julius Caesar's dictatorship and later to Mark Antony cost him dearly. He was executed in 43 BC during the proscriptions. Cicero endures not only as a towering figure in law and politics but also as one of those ancient philosophers whose works people skim through, extract a handful of pithy quotes, and then relentlessly share at dinner parties or on social media. His knack for universal truths ensures his words still resonate, even as they occasionally overstay their welcome in the mouths of exhausting folks.President Biden plans to issue an executive order permanently banning new offshore oil and gas development in specific U.S. coastal waters. This move, based on the 1953 Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, is intended to be difficult for future administrations to reverse and comes as Biden seeks to solidify his environmental legacy in the final weeks of his presidency. The protections aim to safeguard marine ecosystems, protect vulnerable coastal communities, and combat climate change, aligning with calls from environmental groups and congressional Democrats. While Biden's actions will not affect existing leases, the scope of the new protections is expected to include key areas like parts of the Pacific near California and the eastern Gulf of Mexico near Florida. Conservationists have praised the move as a necessary step to protect U.S. waters, while oil industry advocates argue it jeopardizes energy independence. Former President Donald Trump is likely to attempt reversing the order, though previous court rulings suggest such efforts may face significant legal hurdles. Offshore drilling remains a contentious issue, with opposition particularly strong in coastal regions reliant on tourism.Biden to Ban More Offshore Oil Drilling Before Trump Arrives (1)A group of Tesla shareholders is appealing a Delaware Chancery Court decision that voided Elon Musk's $56 billion pay package, which would have been the largest CEO compensation in U.S. history. Filed on December 31, the appeal also challenges Chancellor Kathaleen St. J. McCormick's $345 million award in attorneys' fees. McCormick had ruled that Tesla's board and Musk breached fiduciary duties to investors when approving the massive compensation plan. Despite shareholder approval votes in 2018 and 2024, the court found the deal unfairly tilted in Musk's favor. The plaintiffs, including ARK Investment Management LLC and individual investors, argue the appeal is necessary to restore shareholder voting rights and accountability.Attorneys for the shareholders assert that over 70% of investors supported the pay package in two separate votes, emphasizing the high level of approval. Legal representation for Musk, the board, and opposing shareholders have yet to respond to requests for comment. The appeal seeks to overturn a ruling that has intensified debates about executive compensation and corporate governance.Elon Musk Pay Deal Decision Appealed to Delaware High Court (1)The U.S. Supreme Court's 2025 docket includes pivotal labor and employment cases addressing workplace discrimination, wage law exemptions, and employee benefits. Among the key issues is whether workers from "majority backgrounds," like white or heterosexual individuals, face higher hurdles in proving discrimination claims under Title VII. The Court's decision could reshape lawsuits challenging diversity policies. Another case will decide if retirees can sue former employers for disability bias, as exemplified by a Florida firefighter denied benefits. This issue has divided lower courts on whether retirees meet the Americans with Disabilities Act's requirements. Wage law exemptions are also under review, with the Court considering the evidentiary standard employers must meet to prove workers are exempt from overtime protections.Additionally, justices will address the standards for lawsuits under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), involving allegations of excessive fees in retirement plans. These cases could have broad implications for labor law, corporate practices, and workplace equity, shaping the rights of employees and obligations of employers across the nation.Reverse bias, wage law exemptions top US Supreme Court's 2025 labor docket | ReutersThe U.S. Judicial Conference declined to refer Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas to the Department of Justice over allegations of ethics violations related to unreported gifts and luxury travel from a wealthy benefactor. The Conference cited amendments Thomas made to his financial disclosure reports, addressing issues raised by Democratic lawmakers. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson faced similar scrutiny over omissions in her reports but had also filed corrections, leading to the rejection of a referral request against her.Democratic lawmakers argued that Thomas's failure to disclose violated the Ethics in Government Act of 1978, but Thomas stated he was advised such disclosures were unnecessary for "personal hospitality." He committed to following updated guidelines in future filings. The Judicial Conference pointed to its recent efforts to clarify financial disclosure rules and noted Thomas's compliance with the new standards.The body also raised constitutional concerns about its authority to refer the matter to the DOJ, further noting the issue was moot since lawmakers had already requested an investigation directly from Attorney General Merrick Garland. Critics accused the judiciary of failing to hold Thomas accountable, while the judiciary emphasized the ongoing improvements to ethical oversight.US Supreme Court's Thomas will not be referred to Justice Department | ReutersThis week's closing theme is by Johann Strauss Jr. This week's closing theme celebrates Johann Strauss Jr., affectionately known as the "Waltz King," whose music epitomizes the charm and elegance of 19th-century Vienna. Born in 1825 into a musical dynasty, Strauss Jr. surpassed his father's legacy, becoming one of the most celebrated composers of light music. His works captured the spirit of Viennese high society, turning the waltz from a simple dance into an art form beloved across Europe.Strauss's compositions, such as The Blue Danube and Tales from the Vienna Woods, are synonymous with refinement and festivity, making him a perennial favorite for New Year's concerts worldwide. His waltzes are not merely music for dancing; they evoke vivid imagery, from shimmering ballrooms to idyllic countryside scenes. Known for his melodic genius and rhythmic vitality, Strauss's music remains a joyful celebration of life and beauty.This week, we highlight a medley of Strauss Jr.'s waltzes, a perfect encapsulation of his artistry and his gift for weaving together effervescent themes. It's a chance to immerse yourself in the glittering world of 19th-century Vienna and to reflect on the enduring magic of his music. Whether as a tribute to the New Year or simply an appreciation of Strauss's timeless melodies, this medley invites us to waltz into the weekend with grace and exuberance.Without further ado, a waltz medley by the Waltz King – Johann Strauss Jr.  This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

Vu sur VERRES DE JAZZ A VERDELAIS Thomas Fonteyraud est vigneron-trompettiste à Verdelais (33). Chaque premier vendredi du mois, il transforme son chais en marché et en scène musicale. Avec la participation de Patrick, spécialiste du car de ton ? Une émission proposée par Didier Houde Photo Didier Houde Cet article provient de Radio AlterNantes FM

Boire de l'eau entre deux verres de vin, permet-il vraiment d'éliminer l'alcool plus rapidement ? C'est le vrai ou faux de la semaine ! Tous les samedis, retrouvez Flavie Flament en compagnie de Jimmy Mohamed dans l'émission "Ça va beaucoup mieux", votre magazine santé et bien-être.

Tous les matins, à 6h45, un récit d'actualité, contextualisé et raconté avec toute l'expérience journalistique de Matthieu Belliard.

Toutes les réponses à tes questions ! Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

Toutes les réponses à tes questions ! Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

La municipalité de Blois a commandé 4 000 verres "Cigogne" de la marque Duralex qui sont actuellement en cours de déploiement dans l'ensemble des cantines de la ville. Reportage parmi les premiers enfants à en bénéficier au sein de l'école Simone Weil.

Tous les matins à 8H10, Salomé nous donne des infos aléatoires du monde.

Tu veux que je te raconte l'histoire des chiffres au fond des verres? Ok mais par contre moi, je ne raconte mes histoires qu'aux enfants qui se lavent les dents. Donc attrape ta brosse à dents, ton dentifrice, et tu frottes, jusqu'à ce que l'histoire soit terminée!

John 19:38 ¶ After this, Joseph of Arimathea, being a disciple of Jesus, but secretly, for fear of the Jews, asked Pilate that he might take away the body of Jesus; and Pilate gave him permission. So he came and took the body of Jesus. 39 And Nicodemus, who at first came to Jesus by night, also came, bringing a mixture of myrrh and aloes, about a hundred pounds. 40 Then they took the body of Jesus, and bound it in strips of linen with the spices, as the custom of the Jews is to bury. 41 Now in the place where He was crucified there was a garden, and in the garden a new tomb in which no one had yet been laid. 42 So there they laid Jesus, because of the Jews' Preparation Day, for the tomb was nearby.   Here we see the secret disciples come forward when all the others have forsaken Jesus and are hiding. These guys come at the perfect time so the last of the prophecies can be fulfilled Isaiah 53:9 And they made His grave with the wicked-But with the rich at His death. These two men give Jesus a burial fit for a King using 100 pounds of very expensive spices, because He is King Jesus and one day will come back to rule and reign. They are running out of time to get Jesus in the grave before the Sabbath starts and also so the 3 days and 3 nights can be fulfilled, so they use the closest available tomb which happens to be Joseph of Arimathea's. It is done, it is finished, all that is left is for Jesus to come out of the grave and show that He is truly God as if all the miracles He has done is not enough. Romans 10:9 that if you confess with your mouth the Lord Jesus and believe in your heart that God has raised Him from the dead, you will be saved. 10 For with the heart one believes unto righteousness, and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation. 11 For the Scripture says, "Whoever believes on Him will not be put to shame." Trust in Him today.   38 After this, Joseph of Arimathea, being a disciple of Jesus, but secretly, for fear of the Jews, asked Pilate that he might take away the body of Jesus; and Pilate gave him permission. So he came and took the body of Jesus. Mt 27:57; Mr. 15:42; Lu 23:50; Joh 9:22; 12:42 All four evangelists mentioned Joseph of Arimathea but only with Jesus' burial. The Synoptics tell us that he was a God-fearing rich member of the Sanhedrin who was a follower of Jesus and who had not voted to condemn Jesus. Only John identified him as a secret disciple who feared the Jews, namely, the unbelieving Jewish leaders. Jesus had warned His disciples about trying to hide their allegiance to Him (12:42-43). Finally Joseph "broke his cover" by courageously requesting Jesus' body from Pilate. Jesus'  corpse  would  have  ended  up  in  the  grave  of  a  common criminal but for Joseph's intervention. Pilate probably granted his request for Jesus' body because he realized that Joseph wanted to give Jesus' an honorable burial. That would have humiliated the Jews further. Joseph's courageous act doubtless alienated him from many of his fellow Sanhedrin members. We do not know what the ultimate consequences of his action were for him. Evidently it was Jesus' death that made him face up to his responsibility to take his stand for Jesus. I think that he worked up the courage to request an audience with Pilate and then made his request, but not with the arrogance and smugness with which the Jewish religious leaders had dealt with him. His was a humble request, but a reasonable one. Unlike the crucifixion of our Lord, it does not appear to be something that Pilate begrudgingly granted. Indeed, if he felt guilty over condemning an innocent man, he may have felt good that Jesus (this “righteous man,” as Pilate's own wife had referred to Him—Matthew 27:19) was given an honorable burial. And if the other religious leaders happened not to like it, so much the better. Gave him leave. According to Roman law. Ulpian, a Roman jurist of the third century, says: “The bodies of those who are capitally punished cannot be denied to their relatives. At this day, however, the bodies of those who are executed are buried only in case permission is asked and granted; and sometimes permission is not given, especially in the cases of those who are punished for high treason. The bodies of the executed are to be given for burial to anyone who asks for them.” Greedy governors sometimes sold this privilege. Cicero, in one of his orations against Verres, has a terribly graphic passage describing such extortions. After dwelling upon the tortures inflicted upon the condemned, he says: “Yet death is the end. It shall not be. Can cruelty go further? [i] 39 And Nicodemus, who at first came to Jesus by night, also came, bringing a mixture of myrrh and aloes, about a hundred pounds. Joh 3:1-2; 7:50 This was usually the amount used for a King and He is King Jesus Can you imagine the cost for that much spices? The contrast is marked between Nicodemus' first and his second coming.[ii] 40 Then they took the body of Jesus, and bound it in strips of linen with the spices, as the custom of the Jews is to bury. While the Synoptics speak very favorably of Joseph, John is not quite as complimentary in his description of this man. John does not mention that Joseph was a member of the Jewish Sanhedrin or that he opposed their efforts to kill Jesus. John describes Joseph only as a disciple who kept his allegiance to Jesus a secret, for fear of the Jews. It looks as though John wants us to view Joseph as a pretty unlikely candidate to bring about what the Scriptures require, so far as our Lord's burial is concerned. Added to this is the fact that Nicodemus is just as unlikely. Who can pull off what is required here, and in such a short period of time? From what I know of Nicodemus, and from what little I know of Joseph of Arimathea, these two men would not be at the top of my “most likely to be helpful” list. So far as their loyalty to our Lord in the past is concerned, these two men are not impressive. But so far as their ability to accomplish the task (of burying Jesus in a kingly fashion), they are well qualified. This is not the time for a family member or a close follower of Jesus to request His body for burial. But Joseph of Arimathea is a member of the Sanhedrin and a very wealthy man. He offers Pilate the opportunity to rid himself of the responsibility for burying the body of Jesus. Joseph of Arimathea is not alone in his efforts to obtain the body of Jesus and to give Him a proper burial. He is working with Nicodemus, another very prominent member of the Sanhedrin. These two men must have begun their association as colleagues on the Council of the Sanhedrin. When Nicodemus objected to the way the Council was proposing to deal with Jesus, Joseph must have taken notice. They may have talked privately and discovered that they were of like mind regarding Jesus. They may have attempted to support each other as they objected to the course the Sanhedrin seemed bent on taking. While Jesus was being crucified, they seem to have mutually agreed upon a plan to obtain His body in order to give Him a proper burial. One cannot discern from the Gospels just when Joseph and Nicodemus agreed to work together, or when they commenced their efforts to prepare for the burial of Jesus. It may be that Joseph agreed to ask Pilate for permission to remove and bury the Lord's body. At the same time, Nicodemus could have begun to acquire the necessary spices and material to prepare the body of Jesus for burial. Working together, these two men are able to accomplish something that none of our Lord's family or His eleven disciples could achieve—they are able to gain access to Pilate and to gain possession of the body of Jesus. 41 Now in the place where He was crucified there was a garden, and in the garden a new tomb in which no one had yet been laid. John is the only evangelist who recorded that there was a garden and an unused new tomb near the place of Jesus' crucifixion. The tomb was probably an artificial cave in the limestone, many examples of which are observable in Palestine. Matthew noted that the garden and its tomb belonged to Joseph (Matt. 27:60). John's mention of the garden prepares for his reference later to a gardener (20:15). His reference to the tomb being new and unused prepares for the Resurrection in which no other corpse was in the tomb (20:8, 12). "The fall of the first Adam took place in a garden; and it was in a garden that the second Adam redeemed mankind from the consequences of Adam's transgression Look at Isaiah fifty-three verse nine.  His grave was assigned with wicked man, Yet He was a rich man in His death, because he had done no violence, nor was there any deceit in His mouth. We might even say that Jesus was given a burial “fit for a king.” In his account of the burial of Jesus, John gives us some very important details. He not only mentions Joseph of Arimathea, he tells us about Nicodemus. It is only from John's Gospel that we even know of Nicodemus. No other Gospel mentions this fellow. Nicodemus is the same man who “came to Jesus by night,” as we read in John 3:1-2, and as he reminds us in 19:39. It is John's mention of Nicodemus in chapter 7 of his Gospel that now catches my attention. You will remember that Jesus had come to Jerusalem for the Feast of Tabernacles (7:1-10ff.). The Pharisees and chief priests decided it was time to arrest Jesus, so they sent the temple police to bring Jesus to them (7:32). When these men returned empty-handed, the Pharisees were incensed. The officers explained that they had never heard anyone speak as Jesus did (7:45-49). Nicodemus then sought to speak a word (cautiously, it would seem) on Jesus' behalf. He did not openly defend Jesus and His teachings, but he did question his fellow Pharisees about the legality of the method by which they proposed to deal with Him. John 7:50-52- 50 Nicodemus, who had gone to Jesus before and who was one of the rulers, said, 51 “Our law doesn't condemn a man unless it first hears from him and learns what he is doing, does it?” 52 They replied, “You aren't from Galilee too, are you? Investigate carefully and you will see that no prophet comes from Galilee!” In today's legal terminology, Nicodemus is objecting that Jesus is not being given “due process of the law.” Jewish law required that charges against Jesus first be substantiated and, after this, that Jesus be given the chance to speak in His own defense. This had not been done, Nicodemus pointed out, and no one seemed to be heading in the direction of making things right. His peers were not at all gentle in the way they responded to his objections. Here was a highly respected teacher of the law, a Pharisee, a member of the Sanhedrin, and yet he was dealt with as though he were an incoming freshman. “You are not a Galilean, too, are you?” This was no compliment. It was like saying, “How could you be so ignorant?” And then, adding insult to injury, they challenged Nicodemus to look into this subject more carefully, implying that his grasp of the issues was shallow and superficial. I must admit that I had nearly written Nicodemus off in chapter 3, but after reading about Nicodemus in chapter 7, I had totally given up on this man. I assumed that he just sort of wilted under the criticism of his peers, never to be heard from again. I now must rethink my hasty conclusion. I believe that Nicodemus rose to the challenge. I think that he did investigate more thoroughly and found that the Scriptures did point to Jesus as the Messiah. Furthermore, I think that as Nicodemus became more convinced that Jesus was the Messiah, he spoke out more openly, and at least one other person on the Council agreed with him—Joseph of Arimathea. I am willing to go even farther. I wonder if it was not because of the objections of Nicodemus (and perhaps Joseph as well) that the Sanhedrin felt compelled to modify the way they sought to deal with Jesus, so that they at least appeared to be following Jewish law. Is this why Jesus was first brought before Annas, and then Caiaphas, and then finally brought before the whole Council? Is this why the assistance of Rome was requested? If this is the case, then Nicodemus contributed greatly to the process which led to our Lord's crucifixion rather than to death by stoning, as the Jews seemed to prefer. It would also seem that the Sanhedrin voted to hand Jesus over to Pilate, but not without hearing objections from both Joseph and Nicodemus (if, indeed, they were both present). This act of requesting the body of Jesus and giving Him a proper burial may have been a public protest on the part of these two members of the Sanhedrin. All of this would mean that Joseph and Nicodemus were not as passive in their disagreement with their peers on the Sanhedrin as assumed. It is John's Gospel alone that informs us of these two men's lavish use of spices in their preparation of Jesus' body for burial (19:39-40). From the accounts of the Synoptic Gospels, we might have assumed that our Lord's body was not even properly prepared for burial. We read there only that the body of Jesus was “wrapped in a clean linen cloth” (Matthew 27:59; see also Mark 15:46; Luke 23:53). We read also in the Synoptics of the intent of the women to return to the tomb and to prepare the Lord's body with spices (Mark 16:1; Luke 23:55-56; 24:1). It was almost as though the women were unaware of the fact that 100 pounds of spices had been used by Joseph and Nicodemus. Or, perhaps they just felt they could not trust these men to do it right, and they would have to come back later to improve on the work of these two men. The thing that strikes me in John's account is that no mention is made of the fact that the tomb in which Jesus was laid was the one that Joseph had custom-built for himself (Matthew 27:60). From a reading of John's account, one would assume they were carrying the Lord's body away from the cross and through a garden (only John mentions the garden). It was getting late, and they had no time to lose. There was an available tomb nearby, in the garden, and they made use of it. It appears the reason for using this tomb was not because it belonged to Joseph, but because it was close, and it seemed expedient to use it because they had run out of time. This makes sense to me. The question which the reader must ask is, “How was it possible for Jesus to be given a rich man's burial, when none of His eleven disciples were present, and when the time was so short?” Putting together all of the data from the four Gospels, I would conclude that something like this occurred. Joseph and Nicodemus had opposed the Sanhedrin's plan to kill Jesus. At some time during the crucifixion process, they determined to acquire the body of Jesus to give Him a proper burial. Joseph went to Pilate and obtained the body while Nicodemus acquired the necessary spices and cloth. They both went to the cross, took down the Lord's body, and wrapped it in a clean linen sheet. They were carrying the body through the garden, noting the lateness of the hour, and wondering what they should do. Joseph may have looked up and seen the freshly-hewn tomb which he had acquired for his own burial (and perhaps for the use of his family as well). Realizing they were out of time, Joseph told Nicodemus that they would stop right here and bury the body of Jesus in his own tomb. There was no time to do anything else. I am assuming here that Joseph had intended from the beginning to give Jesus a proper burial, but that he had not necessarily planned to bury Jesus in his own tomb. As nightfall approached, Joseph realized that he was in trouble, time-wise. He looked about, and his eyes fixed on his own personal burial place. There was really no other choice, given the time, and so this is the place where they chose to lay the body of Jesus. John tells the story in such a way that the reader sees, once again, the sovereign hand of God, orchestrating these events so that they fulfill the prophecies of old. Jesus was put to death with criminals, but in the final analysis, He was buried with the rich. The One who seemed destined to be buried on “boot hill” is now buried on “snob hill.” And in so doing, prophecy is once again fulfilled. Note, incidentally, that John does not tell us every time that a prophecy is fulfilled. Three times in his account of our Lord's death he indicates that the details of Jesus' death fulfilled prophecy. But here he does not tell us that the Scriptures were fulfilled, even though they were. I believe John expects his readers to figure some things out for themselves. A good teacher does not give the student the answer to every question. A good teacher teaches the student how to find the answers to his questions. John is a good teacher. 42 So there they laid Jesus, because of the Jews' Preparation Day, for the tomb was nearby. Isa 53:9; Joh 19:31 Preparation Day - the day immediately before the Sabbath and other Jewish festivals. Preparation Day always fell on Friday among the Jewish people, because all religious festivals began on the Sabbath, or Saturday (Matt. 27:62; John 19:14, 31). With a week of holidays ahead, the Preparation Day for the Passover was especially busy. The details for preparing the Passover supper had to be completed by afternoon. Preparations included baking the unleavened bread, gathering festive garments to wear for the occasion, and taking a ceremonial bath. But above all, the Passover lamb had to be slain. Slaughtering began an hour or more earlier than for the usual daily evening sacrifice. At the Temple, the priests slaughtered thousands of lambs brought in by the people. Their blood was poured at the foot of the altar. Then the lambs were roasted whole in preparation for the Passover meal in each home that evening.[iii] The chronological reckoning between John's gospel and the Synoptics presents a challenge, especially in relation to the time of the Last Supper (13:2). While the Synoptics portray the disciples and the Lord at the Last Supper as eating the Passover meal on Thursday evening (Nisan 14) and Jesus being crucified on Friday, John's gospel states that the Jews did not enter into the Praetorium “lest they should be defiled, but that they might eat the Passover” (18:28). So, the disciples had eaten the Passover on Thursday evening, but the Jews had not. In fact, John (19:14) states that Jesus' trial and crucifixion were on the day of Preparation for the Passover and not after the eating of the Passover, so that with the trial and crucifixion on Friday Christ was actually sacrificed at the same time the Passover lambs were being slain (19:14). The question is, “Why did the disciples eat the Passover meal on Thursday?” The answer lies in a difference among the Jews in the way they reckoned the beginning and ending of days. From Josephus, the Mishna, and other ancient Jewish sources we learn that the Jews in northern Palestine calculated days from sunrise to sunrise. That area included the region of Galilee, where Jesus and all the disciples, except Judas, had grown up. Apparently most, if not all, of the Pharisees used that system of reckoning. But Jews in the southern part, which centered in Jerusalem, calculated days from sunset to sunset. Because all the priests necessarily lived in or near Jerusalem, as did most of the Sadducees, those groups followed the southern scheme. That variation doubtlessly caused confusion at times, but it also had some practical benefits. During Passover time, for instance, it allowed for the feast to be celebrated legitimately on two adjoining days, thereby permitting the temple sacrifices to be made over a total period of four hours rather than two. That separation of days may also have had the effect of reducing both regional and religious clashes between the two groups. On that basis the seeming contradictions in the gospel accounts are easily explained. Being Galileans, Jesus and the disciples considered Passover day to have started at sunrise on Thursday and to end at sunrise on Friday. The Jewish leaders who arrested and tried Jesus, being mostly priests and Sadducees, considered Passover day to begin at sunset on Thursday and end at sunset on Friday. By that variation, predetermined by God's sovereign provision, Jesus could thereby legitimately celebrate the last Passover meal with His disciples and yet still be sacrificed on Passover day. Once again one can see how God sovereignly and marvelously provides for the precise fulfillment of His redemptive plan. The MacArthur Study Bible. 1997 (J. MacArthur, Jr., Ed.) (electronic ed.). DOCETISM : a belief opposed as heresy in early Christianity that Christ only seemed to have a human body and to suffer and die on the cross God is not interested in outward religion Mt 15:8 'These people draw near to Me with their mouth, And honor Me with their lips, But their heart is far from Me.  Mr. 7:6 He answered and said to them, "Well did Isaiah prophesy of you hypocrites, as it is written: 'This people honors Me with their lips, But their heart is far from Me. You must decide whether to choose the favor of God or of men Joh 12:43 for they loved the praise of men more than the praise of God. Joh 7:13 However, no one spoke openly of Him for fear of the Jews Is Jesus the real Messiah You have to decide, there are 300 plus prophecies fulfilled.  The evidence is overwhelming.      Mark 8:36 "For what will it profit a man if he gains the whole world, and loses his own soul?              John 14:6 Jesus said to him, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me. Have you trusted Him as your Savior? He can Save you if You ask Him based on His death, burial, and resurrection for your sins. Believe in Him for forgiveness of your sins today.               “And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.”  -John 8:32             Our mission is to spread the gospel and to go to the least of these with the life-changing message of Jesus Christ; We reach out to those the World has forgotten.              hisloveministries.podbean.com #HLMSocial hisloveministries.net https://www.instagram.com/hisloveministries1/?hl=en His Love Ministries on Itunes Don't go for all the gusto you can get, go for all the God (Jesus Christ) you can get. The gusto will get you, Jesus can save you. https://www.facebook.com/His-Love-Ministries-246606668725869/?tn-str=k*F             The world is trying to solve earthly problems that can only be solved with heavenly solutions [i] Vincent, M. R. (1887). Word studies in the New Testament (Jn 19:38). New York: Charles Scribner's Sons. [ii] Vincent, M. R. (1887). Word studies in the New Testament (Jn 19:39). New York: Charles Scribner's Sons. [iii] Nelson's new illustrated Bible dictionary. 1995 (R. F. Youngblood, F. F. Bruce, R. K. Harrison & Thomas Nelson Publishers, Ed.). Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson, Inc.

Saturday, 1 June 2024   Now when they had escaped, they then found out that the island was called Malta. Acts 28:1   A literal rendering of the Greek would be, “And, having been saved, then they knew that the island is called Malta.” (CG).   The last verse of the previous chapter noted that all had come to shore safely. With that, Chapter 28 begins with, “And, having been saved.”   The same word that was used to end Chapter 27 is again used here, diasózó. In that verse, it was an aorist verb, now it is an aorist participle –   And thus it was all were saved upon the land. And, having been saved...   The task is complete, all having been brought safely and securely to the shores of the island. With that now complete, it next says, “then they knew that the island is called Malta.”   The Alexandrian text (NIV e.g.) says “we” rather than “they.” At the end of the previous chapter, the NIV says “everyone” instead of “they.” As Luke was present and he obviously survived, one would think that he would include himself in this and say “we.” However, he may be making himself an outside evaluator of the events at this time. Or he may still be referring to Julius and the other soldiers who were in charge of ensuring that all came to the island safely.   Either way, and regardless of this, all made it ashore and came safely to what they found out was the island of Malta. Although it is evident this is the true spot of landing, there is one other claim to the location of the wreck. In order to give all of the details, the lengthy commentary of Charles Ellicott is provided -   “There is no ground for questioning the current belief that this was the modern Malta, It was the only island known as Melita by the Greeks and Romans. The gale, which had been blowing for fourteen days since the ship left Crete, would drive her in that direction. The local features of St. Paul's Bay agree closely, as has been seen, with the narrative in the Acts. There has from a very early date been a local tradition in favour of the belief. The Bay bears St. Paul's name. A cave is pointed out as having given him shelter. There has, however, been a rival claimant. In the Gulf of Venice, off the coast of Illyria, there is a small island, Meleta (now Meleda), which has been identified by some writers with the scene of St. Paul's shipwreck. The view is first mentioned by Constantino Porphyrogenitus, a Greek writer of the tenth century, and was revived in the last century by Padre Georgi, an ecclesiastic of the island. There is, however, not a shadow of evidence in its favour, beyond the similarity (riot identity) of name, and the mention of Adria in Acts 27:27. It has been shown, however, that that term was used with far too wide a range to be decisive on such a question; and against the view there are the facts (1) that it would almost have required a miracle to get the ship, with a north-east gale blowing strongly, up to the Illyrian coast of the Gulf of Venice; (2) that a ship would not naturally have wintered on that coast on its way from Alexandria to Puteoli (Acts 28:11); (3) that there has been no local tradition in its favour, as at Malta. The island of Malta was originally a Phoenician colony. It came under the power of Carthage in B.C. 402, and was ceded to Rome in B.C. 242. Its temple, dedicated to Juno, was rich enough to be an object of plunder to Verres, the Prætor of Sicily (Cic. In Verr. vv. 46).”   Life application: People naturally want things to apply to themselves if they are notable in some manner. It is certain that Malta is where the ship ran aground and there are few who would question this. And yet, there is a challenge to this because someone wanted to appear to have discovered something others didn't know, or maybe because there was pride in those in a different location that they were the focus of the biblical narrative.   This happens all the time. People in various cultures claim that they are the true Israelites who were exiled from the land. This is claimed by Mormons. It is claimed by British Israelism. It is claimed by various sects of the Church of God. And so forth. None of these are even close to reality, and yet the claims are made.   Also, it is often argued, even vehemently, that the New Testament was originally written in Hebrew or Aramaic despite there being no sound reason to claim this. And more, internal clues abound that it is not so.   These and ten thousand other such claims are made because people want to identify with one thing or another that they want to be true. This is unsound. It causes real problems with doctrine, and it causes divisions that should not exist.   We should be willing to objectively evaluate such things and come to reasonable conclusions concerning them. If we do, for sure our doctrine will be more properly aligned with God's intent, and we will not grow into the cult-like mentality that so easily permeates our minds, our lives, and even controls our destinies.   Be wise and discerning and check out the things you hear, lest you get caught up into the strange doctrines that are warned against in the word (see Hebrews 13:9).   Heavenly Father, may we not be led astray by odd, goofy, and irregular teachings that have no bearing on reality. Rather, may we be guided by Your Spirit and willing also to check all things and test them for accuracy. May it be so to Your glory! Amen.

Tous les matins, l'œil malicieux de Charles Magnien se pose sur un sujet tabou ou gênant. Le rendez-vous pour débattre à la machine à café.

Tous les matins, l'œil malicieux de Charles Magnien se pose sur un sujet tabou ou gênant. Le rendez-vous pour débattre à la machine à café.

Marceau refait l'info, c'est du lundi au vendredi à 7h30, 8h30 et 9h30 dans le Morning du rire avec Bruno Roblès

Marceau refait l'info, c'est du lundi au vendredi à 7h30, 8h30 et 9h30 dans le Morning du rire avec Bruno Roblès

En France, la célèbre verrerie Duralex de la Chapelle-Saint-Mesmin, près d'Orléans, a été placée en redressement judiciaire mercredi. Ce n'est pas la première fois que ce fleuron français se retrouve au bord de la faillite. Jusqu'à présent, le groupe a toujours gardé sa réputation d'être incassable, comme ses verres. Il a désormais six mois pour trouver une solution. Retour sur la saga Duralex. 

Pourquoi les verres à vin ont un pied ? Bah oui tiens, on pourrait boire du vin dans des verresnormaux, pourquoi cette boisson, particulièrement, mérite un verre spécial rien que pour elle ?Imaginez la scène : un dîner élégant, une table dressée avec soin, et au centre, unemajestueuse bouteille de petrus se tenant à côté d'un gobelet à bière genre Ecocup de festival.Ça le fait pas, hein ? Eh ben sachez que non, le verre à pied, ce n'est pas juste pour faire joli oupour tester votre stabilité après quelques verres. Le pied du verre à vin est un chef-d'œuvre defonctionnalité et d'élégance.

Focus sur le marché de la lunette et des verres optiques, avec le directeur général des opticiens Krys, Jean Pierre Champion. Ecorama du 15 avril 2024, présenté par Aude Kersulec sur Boursorama.com

Une Québécoise aurait été violée et battue au Mexique. D'autres épisodes de violence armée à Montréal au cours du week-end. 10 suspects arrêtés pour un méga-vol dans une bijouterie de Pointe-Claire. Discussion faits divers de Maxime Deland, journaliste à l'Agence QMI.Pour de l'information concernant l'utilisation de vos données personnelles - https://omnystudio.com/policies/listener/fr

Cours Halakha Time du Vendredi 12 Avril 2024 (durée : 5 minutes) donné par Rav Emmanuel BENSIMON.

La Mitsva des 4 verres de vin

Le psychiatre et addictologue qui intervient régulièrement dans «Ça commence aujourd'hui» sur France 2 avec Faustine Bollaert sort un livre sur les addictions et nos comportements du quotidien. Rencontre sur le plateau du «Buzz TV».

Cette semaine, je vous propose de partir à la rencontre d'un grand nom de la sommellerie française : Fabrice Sommier. Fabrice est meilleur ouvrier de France en sommellerie et président de l'UDSF. Au delà de son parcours, Fabrice a un engagement : celui d'ajouter de la conscience dans ce qu'on mange et ce qu'on boit. Au travers de notre échange, nous avons évoqué de nombreux sujets sur la sommellerie bien sûr mais aussi sur les études, sur la place du goût, la place des concours et sur beaucoup d'autres sujets. Je vous laisse découvrir cette interview et j'espère que vous y prendrez autant de plaisir que moi. Bonne écoute !▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬

Difficile à comprendre : Pierre Benichou se retrouve avec deux verres d'eau devant lui. Mais qu'est ce que cela veut dire ? Tous les samedis et dimanches, retrouvez 3 archives des meilleurs moments des Grosses Têtes de Laurent Ruquier.

A vos papilles, prêts, savourez ! Plongeons dans le cœur des vin liquoreux, moelleux… Leur élaboration reste un défi. Enfants du gel, du passerillage, de champignons … Egrappons le propos avec notre Eminence es Vins : Fabrizio Bucella ! Merci pour votre écoute Bientôt à table, c'est également en direct tous les samedi de 11h à 12h sur www.rtbf.be/lapremiere Retrouvez bien plus de contenus de Bientôt à table sur notre plateforme Auvio.be : https://auvio.rtbf.be/emission/23648 Et si vous avez apprécié ce podcast, n'hésitez pas à nous donner des étoiles ou des commentaires, cela nous aide à le faire connaître plus largement.

En dépit des nombreux adages français qui louent les vertus de l'alcool, comme le célèbre « Pour la toussaint, tout le vin est saint », les recommandations officielles gouvernementales vont plutôt vers la moindre consommation. Mais y a-t-il un seuil limite à partir duquel l'alcool devient véritablement dangereux pour la santé ?Les effets de l'alcool sur l'organismeCommençons par étudier la façon dont l'alcool influe sur nos mécanismes physiologiques. L'éthanol présent dans les boissons alcoolisées résulte d'une fermentation de levures par des sucres. Antiseptique, il exerce surtout un effet dépresseur sur le système nerveux central : cela signifie qu'il réduit l'activité neuronale. Les informations sont donc transmises plus lentement que d'habitude. La personne qui a bu peut avoir du mal à faire preuve de coordination motrice, son temps de réaction est allongé et sa capacité à prendre des décisions affectée.Bien que l'alcool procure une sensation d'apaisement et d'euphorie, il altère donc notre faculté de raisonnement et de jugement. Une fois ingéré, l'éthanol est absorbé rapidement au niveau digestif et se retrouve dans le sang. Son élimination par le foie se fait à une vitesse très variable, en fonction du sexe, du poids et de l'état de santé de la personne.Recommandations de consommation d'alcool en FranceSi chaque pays fixe ses propres limites en termes de consommation d'alcool, la France a opté pour un maximum recommandé de 10 verres standards d'alcool par semaine, et jamais plus de deux verres par jour. Elle conseille également de pratiquer des jours d'abstinence dans la semaine. Un verre standard contient en moyenne 10 grammes d'éthanol pur, et correspond par exemple à 25 cl de bière ou 10 cl de vin.Les études en faveur de l'alcool à dose modéréeLa consommation légère ou modérée d'alcool, c'est-à-dire respectant les recommandations officielles, a prouvé son intérêt dans certains cas. Des études ont ainsi démontré que l'alcool pouvait protéger les personnes de plus de 40 ans des maladies coronariennes, en aidant à limiter les plaques qui se forment dans les artères et en favorisant le bon cholestérol dans le sang.D'autres recherches ont établi que la consommation légère d'alcool pouvait protéger des accidents ischémiques grâce à son action antiplaquettaire. L'éthanol empêche les plaquettes de s'agréger, limitant ainsi le risque de formation d'un caillot qui bloquerait l'artère. Les polyphénols présents dans le vin rouge offriraient également une action anti-inflammatoire favorable au maintien de la santé.La bonne limite : à adapter selon son sexe et son poidsEn se basant sur les recommandations de Santé Publique France, il semble approprié de consommer une quantité modérée d'alcool sans risque pour la santé. Il faut toutefois penser à adapter la limite à chaque cas. Par exemple, les femmes présentent une composition corporelle différente de celle des hommes, avec davantage d'eau, ce qui explique pourquoi leur concentration sanguine est plus élevée avec la même consommation d'alcool. Elles devraient idéalement se cantonner à un verre standard d'alcool par jour. Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

En dépit des nombreux adages français qui louent les vertus de l'alcool, comme le célèbre « Pour la toussaint, tout le vin est saint », les recommandations officielles gouvernementales vont plutôt vers la moindre consommation. Mais y a-t-il un seuil limite à partir duquel l'alcool devient véritablement dangereux pour la santé ? Les effets de l'alcool sur l'organisme Commençons par étudier la façon dont l'alcool influe sur nos mécanismes physiologiques. L'éthanol présent dans les boissons alcoolisées résulte d'une fermentation de levures par des sucres. Antiseptique, il exerce surtout un effet dépresseur sur le système nerveux central : cela signifie qu'il réduit l'activité neuronale. Les informations sont donc transmises plus lentement que d'habitude. La personne qui a bu peut avoir du mal à faire preuve de coordination motrice, son temps de réaction est allongé et sa capacité à prendre des décisions affectée. Bien que l'alcool procure une sensation d'apaisement et d'euphorie, il altère donc notre faculté de raisonnement et de jugement. Une fois ingéré, l'éthanol est absorbé rapidement au niveau digestif et se retrouve dans le sang. Son élimination par le foie se fait à une vitesse très variable, en fonction du sexe, du poids et de l'état de santé de la personne. Recommandations de consommation d'alcool en France Si chaque pays fixe ses propres limites en termes de consommation d'alcool, la France a opté pour un maximum recommandé de 10 verres standards d'alcool par semaine, et jamais plus de deux verres par jour. Elle conseille également de pratiquer des jours d'abstinence dans la semaine. Un verre standard contient en moyenne 10 grammes d'éthanol pur, et correspond par exemple à 25 cl de bière ou 10 cl de vin. Les études en faveur de l'alcool à dose modérée La consommation légère ou modérée d'alcool, c'est-à-dire respectant les recommandations officielles, a prouvé son intérêt dans certains cas. Des études ont ainsi démontré que l'alcool pouvait protéger les personnes de plus de 40 ans des maladies coronariennes, en aidant à limiter les plaques qui se forment dans les artères et en favorisant le bon cholestérol dans le sang. D'autres recherches ont établi que la consommation légère d'alcool pouvait protéger des accidents ischémiques grâce à son action antiplaquettaire. L'éthanol empêche les plaquettes de s'agréger, limitant ainsi le risque de formation d'un caillot qui bloquerait l'artère. Les polyphénols présents dans le vin rouge offriraient également une action anti-inflammatoire favorable au maintien de la santé. La bonne limite : à adapter selon son sexe et son poids En se basant sur les recommandations de Santé Publique France, il semble approprié de consommer une quantité modérée d'alcool sans risque pour la santé. Il faut toutefois penser à adapter la limite à chaque cas. Par exemple, les femmes présentent une composition corporelle différente de celle des hommes, avec davantage d'eau, ce qui explique pourquoi leur concentration sanguine est plus élevée avec la même consommation d'alcool. Elles devraient idéalement se cantonner à un verre standard d'alcool par jour. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Si l'on est en droit d'attendre d'un établissement estampillé de l'enseigne «bar à vin» qu'il soit à la hauteur de nos attentes vineuses, force est de constater que certains d'entre eux ne méritent pas que l'on s'y abreuve. Voici comment les repérer à coup sûr. Dans ce nouvel épisode de Parlons Vin, Alicia Dorey, responsable éditoriale du Figaro Vin, vous parle de carte à trous, de désinvolture et de chouette effarouchée. Et n'oubliez pas : parlons peu mais Parlons Vin ! Vous pouvez écouter cet épisode sur Figaro Radio, le site du Figaro et sur les plateformes d'écoutes : Apple Podcast, Spotify, Amazon Music, Deezer. Montage : Antoine Lion Ranty

Thursday, 18 May 2023   But Paul said to them, “They have beaten us openly, uncondemned Romans, and have thrown us into prison. And now do they put us out secretly? No indeed! Let them come themselves and get us out.” Acts 16:37   In the previous verse, the jailor told Paul that the magistrates had sent word to let them go. With that, Luke now records, “But Paul said to them.”   As noted in the comments of the previous verse, the rod bearers were obviously with the jailor when he gave them the news of their release because the address is now in the plural. Paul is speaking to the jailor and the rod bearers. In his response, he says, “They have beaten us openly, uncondemned Romans.” The word “openly” is more appropriately translated as “publicly.” They were shamed before other citizens and even non-citizens in a manner that was considered wholly intolerable to the laws of Rome.   Of this, Charles Ellicott says –   “By the Lex Porcia (B.C. 247), Roman citizens were exempted from degrading punishment, such as that of scourging. It was the heaviest of all the charges brought by Cicero against Verres, the Governor of Sicily, that he had broken this law.”   As Paul uses the plural, us, it indicates that Silas was also a Roman. It would be wholly inappropriate to speak the plural in this manner if it were not so. How Silas obtained his citizenship is unknown. However, in Acts 22:28 we find that Paul was born a Roman citizen. That carried an exceptional mark. Others became citizens in various ways, but to be born a Roman meant that his father was a citizen before him as well.   In having beaten Paul and Silas, three extremely serious charges could be raised. The first is that it was a violation of Roman law to do so. Second, Paul notes that they were beaten publicly. Third, and certainly most egregiously, they had been disgraced in this manner without any trial having been held. They were stripped of their clothing while at the same time, they were stripped of their rights as Romans. Further, along with these disgraces, Paul says, “and have thrown us into prison.”   Vincent's Word Studies, citing a scholar named Hackett, says “that almost every word in this reply contains a distinct allegation. It would be difficult to find or frame a sentence superior to it in point of energetic brevity.” Paul's noting of their being thrown into prison carries with it the cumulation of all the injustices explicitly stated along with those that went unstated.   They would have been deprived of food. They would not have been properly treated regarding the wounds they received. They were bound like animals in the filth of a Roman cell. These and other injustices would have all come together in their incarceration, heaping up guilt upon those who had allowed the events to occur. Because of this, Paul now contrasts the word “openly” by saying, “And now do they put us out secretly?”   The magistrates had violated the law in an open and disgraceful manner. No matter what reason they had for releasing them from prison so early in the morning, it certainly carried with it a desire to secretly hide away what had occurred. Paul was adamantly not going to allow that to happen. Thus, he says, “No indeed!”   Throughout the ages, the same idea has been communicated in various abrupt but poignant ways. In modern English, we might say, “No way Jose,” “I think not,” or “Not gonna happen.” The succinct nature of the words provides its own emphasis. Such is the case with Paul's words. With that uttered, he next says, “Let them come themselves and get us out.”   Of this demand of Paul, Albert Barnes provides five valid points to consider –   (1) Because they had been illegally imprisoned, and the injustice of the magistrates should be acknowledged.   (2) because the Roman laws had been violated, and the majesty of the Roman people insulted, and honor should be done to the laws.   (3) because injustice had been done to Paul and Silas, and they had a right to demand just treatment and protection.   (4) because such a public act on the part of the magistrates would strengthen the young converts, and show them that the apostles were not guilty of a violation of the laws.   (5) because it would tend to the honor and to the furtherance of religion. It would be a public acknowledgement of their innocence, and would go far toward lending to them the sanction of the laws as religious teachers.   Life application: As noted in the previous verse, it is ridiculous for Christians to not use the rights allowed to them within their society when they are unfairly treated. For example, Christians are expected to pay taxes. Taxes are used for the various social and legal protections provided by the law. Christians are required to conform to the laws, rules, regulations, and statutes of the land in which they live. These things are imposed on all citizens of a nation to ensure things run smoothly and to ensure people are treated fairly while also being held accountable when they do not conform to the standards of society.   To submit to such things as these, but then not use those same rights and benefits when it is opportune to do so – such as in voting – is, frankly, foolish. If a citizen will be directed in these things by whoever is elected to office, but he is unwilling to vote when he has the right to do so, it means that he may be setting himself up to lose the very protections that he is granted.   This is the state of the United States today. Those on the left are actively working to take away the rights of citizens in general and those of Christians in particular. And yet, weak-kneed, unthinking Christians fail to use their rights and to exercise their responsibilities within the nation they live. When those rights are taken away from them, they will only have themselves to blame. Paul would find their peevishness and absurd self-piety appalling, as is evidenced by his remarks recorded in Acts 16:37.   Heavenly Father, may we use right thinking concerning our lives within our society. If we fail to do so, we will be overcome by tragedy when we find we have squandered our responsibilities and lost our rights as citizens of the nations in which we live. Help us not to be reckoned as peevish examples of folly and foolishness. Amen.

Rejoignez toute l'équipe PPG sur le Discord: Ca se passe ici!  On vous attend pour échanger sur les différentes émissions, le JV en général, les machines et même pour jouer en coop! Retrouvez "Le temps d'une bande annonce" sur Youtube : CLIQUEZ!  Pour Une Poignée de Gamers - La Chaîne Podcast JV Console & Culture Geek Saloon PPG: L'impact du JV Indé  Emission Libre Antenne  de l'équipe PPG Vous pouvez nous retrouver sur Itunes, Ausha, PodCloud, Deezer, Spotify, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram & Youtube.  Si vous appréciez l'émission et que vous souhaitez nous encourager à poursuivre, merci de laisser un commentaire étoilé sur Apple-podcast ou sur votre application podcast... Bonne écoute à tous! Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Pour-une-Poign%C3%A9e-de-Gamers-1909069955882373/ Twitter:  https://twitter.com/PPGlePodcast  Ausha:  https://podcast.ausha.co/pour-une-poignee-de-gamers Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ppglepodcast/  Youtube:  https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC9ZmfGDokSlv-8dpzENO4BQ  

durée : 00:05:53 - La Chronique vin de Jérôme Gagnez - par : Jérôme Gagnez - Jérôme Gagnez est partie à la découverte des brasseries Montréalaises et des vins québecois

Tous les jours à 09H10, Valou répond aux questions que personne ne se pose et que vous lui posez !

Yannick et Pierre-Luc se rencontrent pour parler d’amitié, de l’efficacité comique des Simpsons mais vous prient de ne pas voler l’identité de quiconque! ? Billets pour le show de Pierre-Luc ? Billets pour la FINALE de 3 Bières

Yannick et Pierre-Luc se réunissent aux Verres Stérilisés pour discuter des événements de la semaines et de vos sujets!

durée : 00:25:59 - Les Nuits de France Culture - 5e étape : "La halte chez Madame Gertrude à Epinal". Classique de la culture populaire, "Le Tour de la France par deux enfants" de G. Bruno (1877) est raconté par Michel Bouquet dans une adaptation radiophonique de 1976. Deux frères, fuyant l'annexion de la Lorraine, voyagent en France à pied. Dans l'adaptation radiophonique du Tour de la France par deux enfants que France Culture proposait à ses auditeurs de 1976, chacun des épisodes regroupait tout ou partie de plusieurs chapitres du mythique manuel de lecture. Ainsi l'épisode 5 réunissait-il les chapitres 23 à 26 du livre, qu'Augustine Fouillée avait publié sous le pseudonyme de G. Bruno en 1877. "On regarde une chose avec plus d'intérêt quand on sait d'où elle vient et qui l'a faite" À ce stade de leur périple, après avoir quitté leur ville de Phalsbourg dans la partie de la Lorraine annexée par l'Allemagne, André et Julien Volden étaient à Épinal, dans un département des Vosges demeuré presque intégralement français. Les chapitres réunis dans l'épisode que nous écoutons vantent le savoir-faire de la Lorraine dans la verrerie, la broderie, le papier peint, la lutherie et reflètent l'image d'une région des Vosges visiblement prospère. Il est vrai que le département connut un réel développement après la défaite de 1870, notamment dans le secteur textile, avec l'arrivée de nombreux industriels alsaciens qui avaient fui l'annexion de leur région par l'Allemagne. Illustration musicale :  Octonaire de la vanité et Inconstance du monde de Claude Lejeune par l'Ensemble Jacques Feuillie. De G. Bruno (Augustine Fouillée) Adaptation Sylvie Albert - Interprétation Michel Bouquet et Nathalie Nerval Réalisation : Guy Delaunay Le Tour de la France par deux enfants 5/24 : Les moyens que l'homme emploie pour mettre en mouvement ses machines - Un ouvrier inventeur (1ère diffusion : 06/08/1976) Edition Web : Anne de Biran Archive Ina-Radio France

Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is The Methods of Rationality, Part 15: Chapter 15: Conscientiousness, published by Eliezer Yudkowsky. Love as thou Rowling. Today's historical tidbit: The ancient Hebrews considered the boundary of a day to be sunset rather than dawn, so they said "evening and morning" not "morning and evening". (And as many reviewers noted, modern Jewish halacha asserts the same.) "I'm sure I'll find the time somewhere." "Frigideiro!" Harry dipped a finger in the glass of water on his desk. It should have been cool. But lukewarm it was, and lukewarm it had stayed. Again. Harry was feeling very, very cheated. There were hundreds of fantasy novels scattered around the Verres household. Harry had read quite a few. And it was starting to look like he had a mysterious dark side. So after the glass of water had refused to cooperate the first few times, Harry had glanced around the Charms classroom to make sure no one was watching, and then taken a deep breath, concentrated, and made himself angry. Thought about the Slytherins bullying Neville, and the game where someone knocked down your books every time you tried to pick them up again. Thought about what Draco Malfoy had said about the ten-year-old Lovegood girl and how the Wizengamot really operated... And the fury had entered his blood, he had held out his wand in a hand that trembled with hate and said in cold tones "Frigideiro!" and absolutely nothing had happened. Harry had been gypped. He wanted to write someone and demand a refund on his dark side which clearly ought to have irresistible magical power but had turned out to be defective. "Frigideiro!" said Hermione again from the desk next to him. Her water was solid ice and there were white crystals forming on the rim of her glass. She seemed to be totally intent on her own work and not at all conscious of the other students staring at her with hateful eyes, which was either (a) dangerously oblivious of her or (b) a perfectly honed performance rising to the level of fine art. "Oh, very good, Miss Granger!" squeaked Filius Flitwick, their Charms Professor and Head of Ravenclaw, a tiny little man with no visible signs of being a past dueling champion. "Excellent! Stupendous!" Harry had expected to be, in the worst case, second behind Hermione. Harry would have preferred for her to be rivalling him, of course, but he could have accepted it the other way around. As of Monday, Harry was headed for the bottom of the class, a position for which he was companionably rivalling all the other Muggle-raised students except Hermione. Who was all alone and rivalless at the top, poor thing. Professor Flitwick was standing over the desk of one of the other Muggleborns and quietly adjusting the way she was holding her wand. Harry looked over at Hermione. He swallowed hard. It was the obvious role for her in the scheme of things... "Hermione?" Harry said tentatively. "Do you have any idea what I might be doing wrong?" Hermione's eyes lit up with a terrible light of helpfulness and something in the back of Harry's brain screamed in desperate humiliation. Five minutes later, Harry's water did seem noticeably cooler than room temperature and Hermione had given him a few verbal pats on the head and told him to pronounce it more carefully next time and gone off to help someone else. Professor Flitwick had given her a House point for helping him. Harry was gritting his teeth so hard his jaw ached and that wasn't helping his pronunciation. I don't care if it's unfair competition. I know exactly what I am doing with two extra hours every day. I am going to sit in my trunk and study until I am keeping up with Hermione Granger. "Transfiguration is some of the most complex and dangerous magic you will learn at Hogwarts," said Professor McGonagall. There was no trace of any levity upon the face of the stern old w...