Podcasts about nutri score

Je sais que ça peut surprendre, mais c'est pourtant la réalité : sur le bulletin de notes nutritionnel que représente le Nutriscore, la plupart des cassoulets arborent donc un A tout vert... Ecoutez Olivier Dauvers : les secrets de la conso du 01 septembre 2025.Hébergé par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

Ist deine Lieblingscreme umweltfreundlich? Und wie erkennst du das überhaupt? In dieser Folge von „5 Tassen täglich“ geht es um den EcoBeautyScore – ein neues Bewertungssystem, das die Umweltauswirkungen von Kosmetikprodukten sichtbar macht. Ähnlich wie beim Nutri-Score für Lebensmittel reicht die Skala von A (sehr gut) bis E (hohe Belastung). So kannst du Cremes, Seren & Co. endlich transparent miteinander vergleichen. Host Ralf Podszus besucht dafür unsere „Schwesterkolleg*innen“ bei Beiersdorf in Hamburg-Eimsbüttel. Dort trifft er: Dorle Bahr, Head of Sustainability Strategy & Reporting. Sie treibt bei Beiersdorf die Nachhaltigkeitsagenda voran, segelt mit Leidenschaft – und trinkt mindestens fünf Tassen Kaffee am Tag. Und Anke Pilzner, Global Claim Advisor & Expertin für Green Claims. Sie sorgt dafür, dass Nachhaltigkeitskommunikation ehrlich bleibt – und puzzelt am liebsten, um den Kopf freizubekommen. Die beiden erzählen, wie über 70 Unternehmen weltweit einen Branchenstandard für nachhaltige Kosmetik geschaffen haben, welche 16 Umweltindikatoren in die Bewertung einfließen und warum sogar kleine Start-ups profitieren können. Und sie stellen die Frage: Was machst du, wenn dein Lieblingsprodukt plötzlich nur ein „D“ bekommt? Mehr Infos zum EcoBeautyScore findest du hier bei Beiersdorf. https://www.beiersdorf.de/nachhaltigkeit/consumer/eco-beauty-score

Wie lesen wir Inhaltsstoffe von Lebensmitteln richtig? In dieser Folge erklärt euch Achim, was die Hyroglyphen auf der Rückseite wirklich bedeuten, wie ihr erkennt, wie viel Zucker oder Fett ein Lebensmittel enthält und wie ihr den Nutri Score richtig interpretiert. Außerdem erfahrt ihr im Ernährungsmythos der Woche, ob Gluten wirklich immer ungesund ist.

Avec : Richard Ramos, député MoDem du Loiret. - Tous les matins à 8h10, le parti pris argumenté d'un invité sur un sujet d'actualité, avec les témoignages et les réactions des auditeurs de RMC en direct au 3216.

Nestlé verzichtet künftig auf den Nutri-Score in der Schweiz – ein Label, das Konsumentinnen und Konsumenten beim Einkauf eine schnelle Einschätzung der Nährwerte ermöglicht. Undine Lehmann von der Berner Fachhochschule betont im Gespräch, dass dies die Vergleichbarkeit erschwert und politischer Rückhalt fehle. Während in Genf eine Petition für eine verpflichtende Einführung läuft, bleibt unklar, wie es mit der Lebensmittelampel weitergeht.

Sources: Intelligence artificielle : NielsenIQ et VusionGroup s'associent pour optimiser l'assortiment, lemerchandising, la promotion, les prix… / Publication spécialisée / Yves Puget• NielsenIQ and VusionGroup Launch Strategic Alliance to Transform Physical Retail ThroughAdvanced Data and Cutting-Edge AI-Powered Solutions / Page d'actualités entreprises / Nonspécifié• NielsenIQ et VusionGroup s'associent pour transformer le commerce physique grâce à la data etl'IA / Actusnews Wire / Non spécifié• VusionGroup dévoile une alliance stratégique avec NielsenIQ / Option Finance / AOF• VusionGroup dévoile une alliance stratégique avec NielsenIQ / Bourse Direct / AOF• Alimentation : parmi les 150 plats cuisinés analysés par l'association CLCV, 17 % ont pouringrédient principal de l'eau / franceinfo / Non spécifié• Composition des plats cuisinés : peut mieux faire selon la CLCV / Linéaires / Ludivine Canard• Enquête – Plats cuisinés frais et surgelés 2020-2025 : affichage du Nutri-Score en hausse,recettes à revoir / Étude CLCV / Non spécifié• Nutri-Score : les plats préparés épinglés par la CLCV / Capital / Solina Prak• Plats industriels : l'ingrédient n° 1 pourrait vous surprendre (et vous tromper) / Doctissimo / LouiseBallongue & Julie Boët• Carrefour et Intermarché mènent la danse en avril selon Nielsen IQ / NielsenIQ (rapport PDF) /Non spécifié• Parts de marché P4 : Carrefour, Les Mousquetaires et Auchan, toujours le vent dans le dos (grâceà l'effet de parc) / Document PDF interne / Olivier DauversVous souhaitez me retrouver ailleurs qu'en podcast?Vous avez l'embarras du choix!

RTL publie ce mardi une enquête menée par l'association CLCV (Consommation logement et cadre de vie ). Cette étude a été menée sur 150 plats cuisinés frais et surgelés, vendus en grande distribution. Elle révèle une hausse de l'affichage du Nutriscore par rapport à 2020 sur ce type de produits ( 87% affichent le Nutri-Score en 2025 ). 10% des plats cuisinés ont vu leur nutri-score s'améliorer.Distribué par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

RTL publie ce mardi une enquête menée par l'association CLCV (Consommation logement et cadre de vie ). Cette étude a été menée sur 150 plats cuisinés frais et surgelés, vendus en grande distribution. Elle révèle une hausse de l'affichage du Nutriscore par rapport à 2020 sur ce type de produits ( 87% affichent le Nutri-Score en 2025 ). 10% des plats cuisinés ont vu leur nutri-score s'améliorer.Distribué par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

Zahlungsmittel mit Anachronismus, zu viel Arbeit im Homeoffice, zu viele Menschen in der Außenwelt und zu hoher Nutri-Score für meinen Bikini.

durée : 00:47:36 - Grand bien vous fasse ! - par : Ali Rebeihi - Prôné par les scientifiques, décrié par les industriels de la malbouffe, le Nutri-score informe les consommateurs sur les apports nutritionnels de leurs assiettes. Pourquoi la fameuse échelle qui classe les aliments de A à E, du vert au rouge, provoque-t-elle une telle discorde ?

V'là les bonnes nouvelles du lundi 7 avril 2025 Alors qu'en Suisse on se mobilise pour sauver le Nutri-Score, ce système de notation sur le score de santé des aliments, les Etats-Unis devraient sérieusement commencer à se mobiliser pour le maintien de la démocratie. Preuve de plus de la dangerosité […] The post Le Nutri-Score bientôt sauvé? #JDBN first appeared on Radio Vostok.

V'là les bonnes nouvelles du lundi 7 avril 2025 Alors qu'en Suisse on se mobilise pour sauver le Nutri-Score, ce système de notation sur le score de santé des aliments, les Etats-Unis devraient sérieusement commencer à se mobiliser pour le maintien de la démocratie. Preuve de plus de la dangerosité […] The post Le Nutri-Score bientôt sauvé? #JDBN first appeared on Radio Vostok.

Superfoods, Smoothies, Supplements: der Markt der vermeintlich gesunden Produkte boomt seiteinigen Jahren. Überall poppen superteure Bowl-Läden auf, Influencer bewerben Wellness Produkte und im Supermarkt tauchen angebliche Gesundheits Labels wieder Nutri Score immer häufiger auf. Auch in der Politik ist das Thema Gesundheit gerade sehr aktuell, der neue Gesundheitsminister Robert F. Kennedyplant sein neues „Make America Healthy Again“ Programm und in Österreich wurde bei der Budgetkonsolidierung über eine Zuckersteuer diskutiert.Doch was steckt hinter dem ganzen Hype? Die riesige Industrie hinter unseren Lebensmitteln ist schwer zu durchblicken. Mit raffinierten Marketingstrategien spielt sie mit einem Grundbedürfnis der Menschen und holt dabei enorme Profite ein. Die Verantwortung für die Gesundheit wird dabei unter der Illusion, sie sei lediglich eine Frage von Disziplin und Konsum, auf das Individuum abgewälzt.Doch:Was sind hochverarbeitete Lebensmittel?Wie profitieren Konzerne mit ihnen von unserem stressigen Arbeitsalltag? Ist regional einkaufen wirklich besser für die Umwelt? 

Un nouveau Nutri-Score va apparaître sur les emballages. Cette version améliorée permet une meilleure différenciation des produits en prenant en compte des avancées scientifiques sur la nutrition. Les aliments riches en sel, en sucre et en graisses saturées seront plus sévèrement notés, tandis que les huiles saines et les poissons gras seront mieux valorisés. Malgré ces avancées, son affichage reste facultatif, ce qui limite son impact.

Le 14 mars, le nouveau mode de calcul du Nutri-Score, plus sévère à l'égard de certains produits transformés, a été validé par le gouvernement après quatorze mois de flottement et plusieurs semaines de blocage.Ce système d'information sur les qualités nutritives des aliments a été lancé en 2018. Non obligatoire, il est basé sur le volontariat des entreprises de l'agro-alimentaire qui choisissent d'indiquer ou non une classification qui va du « A » vert au « E » orange foncé, en fonction de la teneur en sel, en sucre et en gras de leurs produits. Les industriels ont deux ans pour répercuter le nouveau mode calcul sur les emballages, et certains ont déjà annoncé qu'ils ne l'afficheront plus.Code source fait le point sur le Nutri-Score avec Gwenael Bourdon, journaliste au service économie du Parisien.Écoutez Code source sur toutes les plates-formes audio : Apple Podcast (iPhone, iPad), Amazon Music, Podcast Addict ou Castbox, Deezer, Spotify.Crédits. Direction de la rédaction : Pierre Chausse - Rédacteur en chef : Jules Lavie - Reporter : Barbara Gouy - Production : Thibault Lambert et Clara Garnier-Amouroux - Réalisation et mixage : Theo Albaric - Musiques : François Clos, Audio Network - Archives : France 24. Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

Le nouveau nutri-score est en train de se mettre en place : les produits alimentaires sont toujours notés entre A et E, mais avec des critères plus sévères. Les entreprises ont 2 ans pour mettre à jour leurs emballages, mais avec Martin y a pas d'attente. Le nouveau nutri-score, c'est maintenant, et c'est évidemment n'importe quoi.

Le nouveau nutri-score est en train de se mettre en place : les produits alimentaires sont toujours notés entre A et E, mais avec des critères plus sévères. Les entreprises ont 2 ans pour mettre à jour leurs emballages, mais avec Martin y a pas d'attente. Le nouveau nutri-score, c'est maintenant, et c'est évidemment n'importe quoi.

« L'arrêté est à ma signature. Je n'ai pas encore signé. Je ne sais pas quelles sont mes marges de manœuvre pour en corriger les effets négatifs. » Mercredi 5 mars, au Sénat, la ministre de l'agriculture et de la souveraineté alimentaire française, Annie Genevard, assume le fait de bloquer l'entrée en vigueur de la nouvelle version du Nutri-Score en France. En 2021, alors députée (Les Républicains) du Doubs, elle avait déjà qualifié cet indice nutritionnel de « péril mortel » pour la filière du comté, importante dans sa circonscription.Neuf jours après sa prise de parole à la chambre haute du Parlement, la ministre a fini par entériner la nouvelle version du Nutri-Score, sous la pression de ses homologues de l'économie et de la santé.Pourquoi son mode de calcul a-t-il été révisé ? Comment se fait-il qu'il ait semé la division parmi les responsables politiques et les industriels ? Quels sont les effets concrets du Nutri-Score depuis son adoption en France et ailleurs en Europe ? Dans cet épisode du podcast « L'Heure du Monde », Manon Romain et Romain Geoffroy, journalistes des Décodeurs au Monde, répondent à toutes ces questions.Un épisode de Marion Bothorel. Réalisation : Thomas Zeng. Musiques : Amandine Robillard. Présentation et rédaction en chef : Jean-Guillaume Santi. Dans cet épisode : extraits d'une interview d'Agnès Buzyn, le 31 octobre 2017, et d'une prise de parole d'Annie Genevard, le 5 mars 2025, au Sénat.Cet épisode a été publié le 20 mars 2025.---Pour soutenir "L'Heure du Monde" et notre rédaction, abonnez-vous sur abopodcast.lemonde.fr Hébergé par Audion. Visitez https://www.audion.fm/fr/privacy-policy pour plus d'informations.

Dans cette édition :Vladimir Poutine continue de jouer la montre et ne prend pas la paix au sérieux, malgré les appels à un cessez-le-feu de la part d'Emmanuel Macron et de Donald Trump qui espère des signaux positifs de la Russie.L'enquête sur la disparition du petit Emile dans les Alpes de Haute-Provence est peut-être relancée, avec le retour des gendarmes sur les lieux et la saisie d'une jardinière au cœur des investigations.Le collège du Bois d'Aulne à Conflans-Saint-Honorin a été rebaptisé collège Samuel Paty, en hommage au professeur d'histoire-géographie assassiné il y a 4 ans.Le nouveau Nutri-Score, plus sévère, va entrer en vigueur dans les prochains mois, avec des changements notables pour certains produits alimentaires comme les céréales du petit-déjeuner.Le Tournoi des 6 Nations de rugby reprend ce soir avec le match France-Écosse, et la saison de Formule 1 démarre avec le Grand Prix d'Australie.Notre équipe a utilisé un outil d'Intelligence artificielle via les technologies d'Audiomeans© pour accompagner la création de ce contenu écrit.Distribué par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

Dans cette édition :Vladimir Poutine continue de jouer la montre et ne prend pas la paix au sérieux, malgré les appels à un cessez-le-feu de la part d'Emmanuel Macron et de Donald Trump qui espère des signaux positifs de la Russie.L'enquête sur la disparition du petit Emile dans les Alpes de Haute-Provence est peut-être relancée, avec le retour des gendarmes sur les lieux et la saisie d'une jardinière au cœur des investigations.Le collège du Bois d'Aulne à Conflans-Saint-Honorin a été rebaptisé collège Samuel Paty, en hommage au professeur d'histoire-géographie assassiné il y a 4 ans.Le nouveau Nutri-Score, plus sévère, va entrer en vigueur dans les prochains mois, avec des changements notables pour certains produits alimentaires comme les céréales du petit-déjeuner.Le Tournoi des 6 Nations de rugby reprend ce soir avec le match France-Écosse, et la saison de Formule 1 démarre avec le Grand Prix d'Australie.Notre équipe a utilisé un outil d'Intelligence artificielle via les technologies d'Audiomeans© pour accompagner la création de ce contenu écrit.

Ecoutez Le débat du jour avec Amandine Bégot et Thomas Sotto du 12 mars 2025.

Ecoutez Le débat du jour avec Amandine Bégot et Thomas Sotto du 12 mars 2025.

Tous les matins à 7h20, les petits secrets de l'actualité, les infos que vous n'avez pas vues ailleurs. Les journalistes des rédactions de RMC et RMC Sports se mobilisent pour vous raconter les coulisses de l'actualité.

Devant le Sénat, la ministre de l'Agriculture Annie Genevard a dit ne pas vouloir de la nouvelle version du Nutri-score, nouvelle version qui renforce les règles et qui allait dégrader certains produits d'un ou deux crans. Olivier Dauvers se fâche tout rouge : une ministre à la fois clientéliste et faible devant les lobbies. Ecoutez Olivier Dauvers : Les secrets de la conso du 11 mars 2025.

Devant le Sénat, la ministre de l'Agriculture Annie Genevard a déclaré bloquer la nouvelle version du Nutri-score, nouvelle version supposée renforcer les règles et ainsi dégrader certains produits d'un ou deux crans. Olivier Dauvers se fâche tout rouge : une ministre à la fois clientéliste et faible devant les lobbies. Cette saison dans "RTL Matin", Olivier Dauvers part à la quête des bonnes affaires et vous livre ses secrets pour éviter les arnaques et devenir un consommateur avisé !

Tu veux lancer un business en ligne mais tu ne sais pas par où commencer ? Attention, tous les modèles ne se valent pas ! Dans cette vidéo, je te dévoile mon classement Nutri-Score des 5 business models pour générer des revenus pasifs pour les débutants, du pire au meilleur, pour générer des revenus scalables sans te brûler les ailes.

Welkom bij De Derde Helft, de Eredivisie door de ogen van een stelletje amateurs én FRESIA COUSIÑO ARIAS. Met hen blikken we terug op speelronde 25.

+++ Alle Rabattcodes und Infos zu meinen Werbepartnern findet ihr hier: https://linktr.ee/machenoderlassen +++Seit dem 10. Februar steht der Mehlwurm offiziell auf der Liste der „neuartigen Lebensmittel“ der EU-Kommission. Aber wie gesund sind sie wirklich? Zudem nutzen immer mehr Hersteller die freiwillige farbige Nährwertkennzeichnung auf der Vorderseite ihrer Lebensmittel. Was genau bedeutet diese Kennzeichnung?+++Unsere allgemeinen Datenschutzrichtlinien finden Sie unter https://datenschutz.ad-alliance.de/podcast.html +++Unsere allgemeinen Datenschutzrichtlinien finden Sie unter https://art19.com/privacy. Die Datenschutzrichtlinien für Kalifornien sind unter https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info abrufbar.

durée : 00:37:34 - Secrets d'info - par : Benoît COLLOMBAT, Cellule investigation de Radio France - Il y a 5 ans, le Nutri-score avait le vent dans le dos. Il était en passe d'être généralisé et rendu obligatoire en Europe. Mais d'après les informations de la cellule investigation de Radio France, la Commission européenne y a renoncé, sous la pression des lobbies et de l'Italie. - réalisé par : Christophe IMBERT

L'Agence nationale de sécurité sanitaire de l'alimentation de l'environnement et du travail (Anses) propose un étiquetage façon "Nutri-Score" qui indiquerait aux consommateurs à quel point un produit ménager est dangereux pour la santé et l'environnement. Cécilia Solal, coordinatrice du rapport de l'Anses sur la catégorisation des produits ménagers, est l'invitée pour tout comprendre dans RTL Soir. Ecoutez L'invité pour tout comprendre avec Yves Calvi du 06 février 2025.

L'Agence nationale de sécurité sanitaire de l'alimentation de l'environnement et du travail (Anses) propose un étiquetage façon "Nutri-Score" qui indiquerait aux consommateurs à quel point un produit ménager est dangereux pour la santé et l'environnement. Cécilia Solal, coordinatrice du rapport de l'Anses sur la catégorisation des produits ménagers, est l'invitée pour tout comprendre dans RTL Soir. Ecoutez L'invité pour tout comprendre avec Yves Calvi du 06 février 2025.

À l'instar de l'étiquetage Nutri-score, les législations dans le domaine alimentaire sont censées protéger les consommateurs des dérives et leur permettre d'adopter plus facilement une alimentation saine. Cependant, derrière cette étiquette aux cinq couleurs, une guerre économique se joue dans l'ombre. Pourquoi est-il important, sur le plan de la santé, de rendre accessibles les données nutritionnelles, de manière simple et lisible aux consommateurs ? Comment le Logo Nutri-score oriente-t-il les choix des consommateurs ? Pr Serge Hercberg, nutritionniste et épidémiologiste, professeur à l'université Sorbonne Paris-Nord. Auteur de l'ouvrage Mange et tais-toi, un nutritionniste face au lobby agroalimentaire, aux éditions humenSciences Retrouvez l'émission en entier ici : La réglementation dans le domaine de l'alimentation est-elle une garantie pour la santé?

Cet épisode un peu spécial de Chaleur humaine est un extrait du premier Festival des idées organisé par l'équipe du podcast le 14 décembre 2024 au théâtre de la Ville, à Paris. Pendant dix jours, je vous propose dix épisodes avec les invités du Festival, pour se donner des idées pour commencer l'année 2025. Dans cette conversation, le médecin épidémiologiste Jean-David Zeitoun a défendu une généralisation du Nutri-Score, pour améliorer en même temps notre santé et notre environnement. Son conseil : privilégier les distributeurs et les marques qui affichent le Nutri-Score.-------------------Ces épisodes ont été produits par Cécile Cazenave et réalisé par Amandine Robillard, qui a également composé la musique originale.Le Festival Chaleur humaine a été organisé par une équipe de choc : Adèle Ponticelli, Josefa Lopez, Amandine Robillard, Estelle Lavielle, Yoanna Sultan, Kevin Hurtaud et Cécile Cazenave. Un grand merci aussi à celles et ceux qui ont rendu tout cela possible, toutes les équipes du Théâtre de la Ville à Paris, la Maif mais aussi les inestimables Elisa Bellanger, Thomas Steffen, Arnaud Aubron, Alexis Delcambre, la compagnie Zygomatic le label Mangroove Music et la dessinatrice Morgane Guerry.« Chaleur humaine » est un podcast hebdomadaire de réflexion et de débat sur les manières de faire face au défi climatique. Ecoutez gratuitement chaque mardi un nouvel épisode, sur Lemonde.fr, Apple Podcast ou Spotify. Retrouvez ici tous les épisodes.Chaleur humaine c'est aussi un livre qui reprend 18 épisodes du podcast en version texte, que vous pouvez retrouver dans votre librairie favorite.C'est toujours une infolettre hebdomadaire à laquelle vous pouvez vous inscrire gratuitement ici. Vous pouvez toujours m'écrire et poser vos questions à l'adresse chaleurhumaine@lemonde.fr Hébergé par Audion. Visitez https://www.audion.fm/fr/privacy-policy pour plus d'informations.

Gesund einzukaufen ist leichter gesagt als getan, denn die Werbeindustrie hat jede Menge Tricks, um uns in die Irre zu führen. Wer Gesundheits-Claims, Zutatenlisten, NutriScore & Co. richtig zu interpretieren weiß, ist also klar im Vorteil - und wie das klappt, verrät uns Sport-Ernährungswissenschaftlerin Dr. Christina Steinbach. Von ihr erfahren wir, worauf wir für einen gesunden Einkauf wirklich achten müssen und welche Protein-, Carb- und Fettquellen sich für Läufer:innen und gesundheitsbewusste Menschen am besten eignen. Wir diskutieren E-Nummern, NutriScore, Zuckerersatzmittel, Glutenverzicht und vieles mehr - viel Spaß mit der Folge!(00:01:36) - Intro Ende(00:04:56) - Vorsätze einhalten: "Gesünder essen"(00:09:38) - Welche typischen Fehler machen Sportler:innen beim Einkaufen?(00:13:12) - Wo sollten wir einkaufen?(00:17:54) - Worauf sollten wir auf Lebensmittelverpackungen achten?(00:20:24) - Tricks der Werbeindustrie(00:23:03) - Zutatenlisten und Nährwerttabellen - wie sollten sie aussehen?(00:30:01) - Was sind E-Nummern?(00:32:56) - „No-Gos“ auf der Zutatenliste(00:36:10) - Sind Süßungsmittel gesünder als Zucker? (00:39:41) - Was sagt der Nutri-Score aus?(00:47:32) - Die besten Proteinquellen für Sportler:innen(00:57:41) - Die besten Kohlenhydratquellen(01:00:08) - Sollten wir auf Gluten verzichten?(01:05:15) - Die besten Fettquellen(01:09:10) - Produkte für die Darmgesundheit(01:11:12) - Top „Superfoods“(01:12:49) - Abschließende Tipps für Essen & EinkaufenHier geht es zu Christinas Website.Hier findet ihr Christina auf Instagram!Foto: Christine SteinbachMusik: The Artisian Beat - Man of the CenturyHier findet ihr alle aktuellen Gewinnspiele & Rabatt-Aktionen! Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Reprezentanții statelor membre în Comitetul Special pentru Agricultură susțin propunerea Comisiei Europene de a le permite țărilor UE să folosească fondurile de dezvoltare rurală neangajate din perioada 2014-2020, pentru a sprijini de urgență fermierii, deținătorii de păduri și întreprinderile mici și mijlocii care au înregistrat pierderi din cauza fenomenelor climatice extreme din acest an. Resursele disponibile ar trebui să fie direcționate de statele membre către beneficiarii afectați de distrugerea a cel puțin 30% din producția potențială și în funcție de sprijinul pe care aceștia l-au primit în cadrul altor instrumente, ca răspuns la impactul dezastrelor naturale.Propunerea Comisiei va modifica Regulamentul care stabilește cadrul de funcționare a Fondului European pentru Dezvoltare Rurală (FEADR) și ar trebui să intre în vigoare până la sfârșitul anului curent, potrivit unui comunicat emis de Consiliul Uniunii Europene. Urmează votul în Parlamentul European, adoptarea în mod oficial de către Consiliu și publicarea în Jurnalul Oficial.Comisia Europeană lansează observatorul de piață pentru măsline și uleiul de măslineComisia Europeană lansează un observator de piață pentru sectorul uleiului de măsline și măslinelor de masă. Observatorul va servi drept platformă pentru discuții și colaborare între experți care acoperă întregul lanț de aprovizionare, de la producători la exportatori, și va fi modelat după observatoarele de piață deja existente pentru mai multe sectoare agricole, în special lapte, culturi, fructe și legume. Platforma va produce rapoarte și va oferi informații de piață accesibile publicului, transmite DG Agri.Prima reuniune a grupului de experți a avut loc săptămâna trecută la Bruxelles. Pe agenda discuțiilor s-au aflat teme precum situația pieței, proiecții ale producției pe termen mediu, provocări și oportunități comerciale în sector. Perspectivele pentru producția de ulei de măsline se îmbunătățesc în anul de comercializare 2024/2025, însă provocările actuale vor mai menține probabil prețurile ridicate timp de câteva luni, mai arată sursa citată.Carrefour Franța pune accent pe valorile nutriționale ale alimentelorRetailerul francez Carrefour le solicită furnizorilor săi de alimente să aplice sistemul de etichetare nutrițională Nutri-Score pentru produsele destinate vânzărilor online. Cererea a fost transmisă către 550 de producători, printr-o scrisoare semnată de directorul general al lanțului comercial, Alexandre Bompard. „Dacă nu fac acest lucru, vom calcula Nutri-Score pentru ei și îl vom publica pe site-ul nostru, cu excepția cazului în care se opun în mod oficial”, a scris Bompard pe rețeaua LinkedIn.Nutri-Score, sistemul cu coduri de culori ușor de înțeles de către consumatori, a fost lansat în Franța în 2017. Mai multe state europene l-au introdus pentru a ghida consumatorii către alegeri alimentare sănătoase, precum Belgia, Țările de Jos, Luxemburg, Germania, Spania și Elveția, altele au rămas adversari înverșunați, cum ar fi Italia. Producătorul de lactate Danone a fost printre primele companii alimentare care au adoptat sistemul în 2017, dar după revizuirea algoritmului a anunțat că va elimina treptat eticheta de pe toate produsele sale lactate de băut și alternativele pe bază de plante, motivând că sunt asimilate în mod nejustificat categoriei băuturilor răcoritoare.Folosirea etichetei Nutri-Score nu este obligatorie, producătorii o folosesc în mod voluntar.Gripa aviară, pe agenda Comitetului PAFFDatele înregistrate la Organizația Mondială pentru Sănătatea Animalelor indică focare de gripă aviară înalt patogenă în cel puțin nouă state membre: Ungaria, care înregistrează cea mai mare creștere a cazurilor, Austria, Bulgaria, Franța, Italia, Polonia, România, Slovacia și Republica Cehă, scrie Euractiv. În perioada epidemică din 2021 și 2022, 48 de milioane de păsări au fost sacrificate în Uniunea Europeană, dintre care 21 de milioane doar în Franța. Virusul gripei aviare afectează în primul rând păsările de curte și păsările sălbatice, dar ocazional a fost transmis la mamifere. Anul acesta, Statele Unite ale Americii au raportat 45 de cazuri de muncitori agricoli infectați cu virusul contractat de la bovine sau păsări de curte, potrivit sursei citate. În perioada 18 – 19 noiembrie a.c., în cadrul Comitetului permanent pentru plante, animale, alimente și furaje, Comisia Europeană și statele membre discută despre gripa aviară și despre alte afecțiuni ale animalelor din blocul comunitar.Restricții mai puțin dure pentru țările UE angajate în dezvoltarea fondului forestierParlamentul European a votat propunerea Executivului blocului comunitar de amânare cu un an a intrării în vigoare a legii UE privind defrișările pădurilor, însă cu amendamente propuse de grupurile politice, iar proiectul de regulament intră acum în negocieri interinstituționale. O modificare semnificativă pe care eurodeputații au adus-o textului Comisiei este crearea unei noi categorii de țări, care nu prezintă risc în privința defrișărilor, pe lângă cele trei existente deja, respectiv cu risc „scăzut”, „standard” și „ridicat”. Statele clasificate ca fiind „fără risc”, considerate că au o dezvoltare stabilă sau în creștere a suprafețelor de pădure, ar beneficia de cerințe mult mai puțin stricte decât restul țărilor, potrivit unui comunicat emis de legislativul european.ONG-urile de mediu solicită Comisiei și statelor membre interzicerea flufenacetului49 de organizații neguvernamentale au transmis săptămâna trecută o scrisoare Comisiei Europene și statelor membre prin care solicită interzicerea erbicidului pe bază de flufenacet înainte de luna iunie 2025, când expiră perioada de autorizare a acestuia în spațiul comunitar. Cererea vine după ce Agenția europeană pentru siguranța alimentară (EFSA) a constatat că substanța are potențialul de a provoca tulburări endocrine pentru oameni și risc ridicat pentru mediu. ONG-urile au recomandat Comisiei să prezinte o propunere de retragere a erbicidului de pe piața UE în timpul viitoarei reuniuni a Comitetului permanent pentru plante, animale și furaje din 4 și 5 decembrie a.c., iar statelor membre să susțină, de asemenea, interzicerea flufenacetului.Organizațiile de mediu amintesc că substanța chimică a fost aprobată pentru 10 ani în ianuarie 2004, apoi pentru încă 11 ani și jumătate, până în iunie 2025, în contextul amânării unei evaluări a riscului. În prezent, erbicidul pe bază de flufenacet este autorizat în 25 de state membre, fiind utilizat, în principal, pentru culturile de iarnă: grâu, secară și orz.

Ecoutez Olivier Dauvers : Les secrets de la conso avec Olivier Dauvers du 13 novembre 2024.

Aujourd'hui, Flora Ghebali, Emmanuel de Villiers et Charles Consigny débattent de l'actualité autour d'Alain Marschall et Olivier Truchot.

Aujourd'hui, Flora Ghebali, Emmanuel de Villiers et Charles Consigny débattent de l'actualité autour d'Alain Marschall et Olivier Truchot.

Ecoutez Olivier Dauvers : Les secrets de la conso avec Olivier Dauvers du 13 novembre 2024.

durée : 00:06:45 - L'invité de 6h20 - Les attaques des géants de l'agroalimentaire envers le Nutri-score n'ont jamais cessé depuis sa création en 2017. Mais la dernière entrave en date est politique. L'arrêté ministériel qui doit valider le nouveau mode de calcul de cet indicateur nutritionnel n'a toujours pas été publié.

Tous les matins à 7h50, Laurent Neumann prend le temps d'expliquer simplement un phénomène d'actualité complexe. Un rendez-vous pédagogique indispensable pour trouver les réponses aux questions soulevées par l'actualité du jour.

durée : 00:05:48 - Le Journal de l'éco - par : Anne-Laure Chouin - Frontales ou détournées, les attaques des lobbys de l'agro-alimentaires contre le Nutri-score, restent fortes et répétées. Attaqué avec virulence dès sa création en 2017, le Nutri-score a finalement été adopté par environ 1 200 marques même parmi les plus grandes. Pour autant, il reste volontaire.

durée : 00:06:10 - L'invité de 6h20 - Danone abandonne le Nutri-score : pourquoi une telle décision et quelles conséquences pour le géant de l'agro-alimentaire et pour le consommateur ? Le docteur Arnaud Cocaul, nutritionniste, est l'invité du 6h20 pour en parler.

In dieser Episode nehmen wir uns zwei spannende Themen vor: Essig und der Nutri-Score. Du erfährst, was Essig – besonders Apfelessig – wirklich kann und ob die Behauptungen rund um seine Gesundheitsvorteile gerechtfertigt sind. Ist Apfelessig wirklich ein Schlankmacher? Außerdem werfen wir einen Blick auf den Nutri-Score, das Lebensmittelkennzeichnungssystem, das dir helfen soll, gesündere Entscheidungen zu treffen. Aber wie nützlich ist er wirklich? Und welche Kritik gibt es? Hast du Fragen oder Feedback? Schreib mir gern! ✉️ Mail: kontakt@fitlaura.de Folge mir, [@fit__laura](https://www.instagram.com/fit__laura/), auf Instagram, um tägliche Tipps, Motivation und Rezepte zu erhalten. Kennst du schon meine [App](https://www.fitlaura.de/membership/)? Das All in One Paket für DEINE Gesundheit! Teste sie gerne für 1 Monat, jederzeit kündbar & dich erwarten wöchentlich neue Inhalte zu den Bereichen BODY MIND FOOD. Gesunde Ernährung ohne Verzicht: Bestelle dir hier [mein Nutrition Bundle](https://www.fitlaura.de/produkt/nutrition-bundle-bowl-kochbuch-ernaehrungsplan/) aus meinem beliebten Bowl Kochbuch mit passendem Ernährungsplan!

Marlana Malerich from Adapted Co, is the Co-Founder and Sustainable Food Systems Researcher at the Rooted Research Collective (RRC). Marlana, poised to begin her PhD at Sussex University, has spent the last six months focused on ultra-processed foods and plant-based meat alternatives. She joins the show to unpack the complexities of defining and understanding ultra-processed foods through systems like NOVA and Nutri-Score. In this episode, you'll hear about:The NOVA nutritional framework vs the Nutri-score system The history behind hyper palatability of ultra-processed foods – and its link with tobacco companiesIssues with moisture sorting affecting shelf life and texturePros and cons between plant-based and animal-based productsBalancing your diet while navigating the complexity of food classification systemsJump to:(03:50) Negative effects of globally distributed junk food.(08:18) Focus on alternative proteins, and challenges with food advertising.(11:07) Media focusing on ultra-processed foods labeling.(14:38) Ultra-processed foods are designed for overconsumption.(20:07) Plant-based options vary in nutrition quality.(23:39 Reminding myself to appreciate being here alive.(26:50) Featured artist and song(29:09) This episode's MantraFeatured Artist and Song:Deep Mind by ROBMONLinks mentioned in this episode:‘Nutrition and health. The issue is not food, nor nutrients, so much as processing' by Carlos A Monteiro‘The Impact of Transnational ‘‘Big Food'' Companies on the South: A View from Brazil' by Carlos A Monteiro‘Ultra-processed foods: how functional is the NOVA system?' by Véronique Braesco, et alIs the Ultra-processed Food (UPF) concept useful, and for what goals?‘Ultra-processed food exposure and adverse health outcomes: umbrella review of epidemiological meta-analyses' by Melissa M Lane et al‘Food Politics' by Marion NesselAlabora (Foxall Pale Blue Remix) by Beyhude, music was chosen by Marlana MalerichConnect with the showAQUALABZachary Cartwright, PhD

REDIFF - Vous connaissez sans doute le nutri-score : un logo que l'on trouve sur certains produits alimentaires, et qui reflète la qualité nutritionnelle du produit en question. Pour l'indiquer, il y 5 lettres possibles de A à E. Et 5 couleurs, de vert foncé à rouge foncé. Pourtant, vous ne trouvez pas ce nutri-score sur tous les produits de votre supermarché. Pourquoi ? Bons plans, anecdotes insolites, décryptages... Cet été, du lundi au vendredi, Olivier Dauvers vous propose de redécouvrir sa chronique "Les pourquoi de la conso" dans laquelle il dévoile les secrets des produits et des marques du quotidien.

REDIFF - Vous connaissez sans doute le nutri-score : un logo que l'on trouve sur certains produits alimentaires, et qui reflète la qualité nutritionnelle du produit en question. Pour l'indiquer, il y 5 lettres possibles de A à E. Et 5 couleurs, de vert foncé à rouge foncé. Pourtant, vous ne trouvez pas ce nutri-score sur tous les produits de votre supermarché. Pourquoi ? Bons plans, anecdotes insolites, décryptages... Cet été, du lundi au vendredi, Olivier Dauvers vous propose de redécouvrir sa chronique "Les pourquoi de la conso" dans laquelle il dévoile les secrets des produits et des marques du quotidien.

Across a fair chunk of Europe, we've grown used to seeing little traffic light symbols on our food packets that supposedly rate the healthiness of our food. But why might Dominic's chamomile tea get a Nutri-Score rating of C, when a diet cola gets an A? And does Giorgia Meloni have a point in claiming that the ratings are biased against Italians? This week we ring up Alie de Boer, an expert on all things food labelling, to demystify the Nutri-Score system once and for all. We're also talking about why Georgia's at a crossroads between Russia and the EU, and why it's such a scary moment in German politics.  Alie is an assistant professor of nutrition and food law at Maastricht University's Venlo campus. You can watch her excellent video about Nutri-Score here. This week's Inspiration Station offerings: Marina Abramović's new exhibition and Desert Island Discs interview; Gugelhupf.  Thanks for listening! If you enjoy our podcast, we'd love it if you'd consider chipping in a few bucks a month at ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠patreon.com/europeanspodcast⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ (many currencies are available). You can also help new listeners find the show by ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠leaving us a review⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ or giving us five stars on Spotify.  Other resources for this episode:  'Is Georgian Dream Digging Its Own Grave?' - Transitions, May 2024 https://tol.org/client/article/is-georgian-dream-digging-its-own-grave.html 'Are right-wing populists more likely to justify political violence?' - European Consortium for Political Research, March 2024 https://ejpr.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1475-6765.12668?af=R 'How Italian "food nationalism" has blocked Nutri-Score nutrition labelling system in Europe' - Mediapart, January 2024 https://www.mediapart.fr/en/journal/international/060124/how-italian-food-nationalism-has-blocked-nutri-score-nutrition-labelling-system-europe  00:23 A delicious, digestible bowl of European news 02:52 Good week: Georgia's brave protesters 09:43 Bad week: German democracy 21:10 Interview: Alie de Boer on how those Nutri-Score labels on your food actually work 37:51 The Inspiration Station: Marina Abramović and gugelhupf 42:52 Happy Ending: The European Seagull Screeching Championship Producers: Morgan Childs and Katy Lee Mixing and mastering: Wojciech Oleksiak Music: Jim Barne and Mariska Martina ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Instagram⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ |⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Threads⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ |⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠Twitter⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ | ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Mastodon⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ | ⁠Bluesky⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠hello@europeanspodcast.com⁠

The first nutrition labels mandated by the Food and Drug Administration appeared on food packages in 1994. A key update occurred in 2016, informed by new science on the link between diet and chronic disease. Along the way, things like trans fats and added sugars were required, but all along, the labels have been laden with numbers and appear on the back or side of packages. There has long been interest in more succinct and consumer-friendly labeling systems that might appear on the front of packages. Such systems exist outside the US, but for political reasons and lobbying by the food industry, have been blocked in the United States. There's new hope, however, described in a recent opinion piece by Christina Roberto, Alyssa Moran, and Kelly Brownell in the Washington Post. Today, we welcome Dr. Christina Roberto, lead author of that piece. She is the Mitchell J. Blutt and Margot Krody Blutt Presidential Associate Professor of Health Policy in the School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania. Interview Summary This is a really important topic, and if the nation gets this right, it really could make a difference in the way people make product decisions as they're in the supermarket. So, let's talk first about the importance of labeling on the front of the package. Why is that important when all the information is somewhere else, namely on the side or the back? I think there's a couple of key reasons why it's good to do front of packaging food labeling specifically. So, as you mentioned, it was a huge deal in 1994 to get this information mandated to be on food packaging to begin with, right? All of a sudden, there was much more transparency about what's in our food supply, but that being said, when you think about the nutrition facts label, it's pretty dense. There's a lot of percentages, there's a lot of numbers, there's a lot of information to process. And when people are actually in the supermarket shopping, they're making these split-second decisions, right? So, it's not to say that some consumers are turning it around and inspecting that packaging, but the reality is, for most people, it's a very habitual behavior. And so, we want to be in a place where that information is prominent, it's easily accessible, and it's easy to understand so that when you're making those snap judgements, they can be informed judgments. So, you're not talking about taking what's on the back and just moving it to the front. You're talking about a different set of information and symbols that might be available? That's right. Yeah. What front of package labeling is designed to do is just take some of the key bits of information that we know from science is going to be most important for consumers to base their nutritional decisions on. That's things like saturated fat, sodium, added sugars, right? And moving that to the front of the package and communicating about it in a very simple, clear way. So, no numbers, no percentages, just very straightforward language. And ideally some sort of icon, like an exclamation point, that would draw attention to that symbol and just quickly let consumers know that this product is high in those nutrients that you need to be concerned about and you need to try to limit. Why is it an important time to be thinking about this issue in the US? It's an important and it's an exciting time because the FDA right now is highly interested in actually moving forward on a policy that would require these types of front of package labels. And that hasn't been true, as you noted, for about a decade. But last year, the White House convened a very significant conference that hadn't happened in 50 years about nutrition, health, and hunger. And front of package labeling actually made it into their report in that conference as a key objective for this country in terms of a food policy that, under the Biden administration, they want to achieve. What we're seeing the FDA do now is actually undertake a series of research studies to try to understand what should this label look like, and how should it be designed to be consumer friendly. With the hope that actually we'll get a proposed rule on this potentially by June, and even if not by June. There's clear momentum that it looks like this is going to be happening in the near future. In a few minutes, I'd like to ask you about what's taken place in other countries, but what's been the history of this in the US? Front of package labeling really came to a head back in 2009. And it's actually quite a delight to share this with you, Kelly, because you and I were doing some research around it at the time. So, what played out then is a labeling system was introduced called Smart Choices. At its face, it seemed to make sense, right? It was going to be a check mark that was going to be put on products that were deemed to be healthy as a smart choice. So, a consumer could look at that and select something they wanted to eat that was relatively healthy. The reality is when that labeling system came out, it was on Fudgesicles and it was on Cookie Crisp cereal, and there was a lot of kind of concern about whether this type of labeling system was systematically problematic and was going to mislead consumers. And at that time, Kelly, I was a grad student at the Rudd Center and you really taught me quite a bit about how to make things happen and how to have a public health impact. Because we were quite concerned about that system, we actually did a study where we randomly sampled 100 products from Smart Choices and we applied an objective nutrition standard - an algorithm to score those products. What we found is that 64% of those Smart Choices products would not meet healthy by this objective nutrition standard. And so, you had the vision to reach out to the New York Times and alert the media to this. And we started to see a lot of kind of concerning reports in the media, like Smart Choices, what's going on? This doesn't seem very smart. We had done this little bit of science, and then at the Rudd Center, you had reached out to the attorney general of Connecticut at the time, Dick Blumenthal, who was quite interested in consumer protection issues and worked a lot on tobacco. And he took this up as a real public health champion to say this is concerning, we have some of this science, and he came out and threatened legal investigation into that program. What was so remarkable to see in that story, particularly for me as a grad student, was wow you can get these different actors coming together, right? Some of that media attention, science playing the role it needs to play, a public health champion who can really make a difference in the attorney general, and all of that can come together and this program literally halted, they stopped it. And I should say, that was a great public health victory. But immediately after that, the Institute of Medicine, so now the National Academy of Medicine, was charged with writing two reports on front of package labeling. And they came out with one that was focused on the nutrition criteria that should underlie a system like that, and one about the design of the label. And they had some great recommendations, very consistent with what you and I have seen in the science, right? It needs to be accessible, simple, easy to understand. Well, what ended up happening is not much. The industry at that point then released their voluntary labeling system that they call Facts Up Front, which is what we have to this day. And as you might imagine, it has percentages and it has grams and milligrams and it's confusing, and they can also highlight positive nutrients on there. So you can have a Cookie Crisp cereal that's also touting the amount of fiber, the amount of protein. And so that's really what we've been stuck with. It's now only over a decade later that we are at this moment where we're finally seeing this progress, and we're at a place where we might get a labeling system that does a really good job of communicating this information to the consumer. I guess one sort of ironic form of evidence that such a system is likely to really help consumers make decisions is how hard the industry has fought against having such a system. And not to mention the science that exists suggesting that these things might be helpful. A lot of activity has occurred outside the US. Can you describe some of that? Over 40 countries have front of package labeling systems. Now, some are mandatory, some are voluntary. The mandatory ones, as you might imagine, produce better effects. They range. And many of them are designed really well. So, let's take some of the best examples. Chile, for example, has warning labels that alert consumers to whether products are high in saturated fat, sugars, sodium, and calories, and those symbols are designed in a very intuitive way. They're stop sign shaped, so they really leverage the automatic associations consumers have. They're prominent, they're black, they stand out from the packaging. And these well-designed labels, we now have evidence from scientific evaluations that they're producing effects, right? They're leading consumers to purchase less of these unhealthy nutrients. They're also leading to some reformulation. And by that, I mean the industry is trying to figure out, 'well, can we lower the sodium, so we don't get one of those labels?' The other thing that I think is often overlooked with labeling but is so important is once you decide to label the food supply and you have an agreed upon system, that can support other policies. And that's what we see in Chile as well. Now all of a sudden, you can't market foods with these warning labels to kids, right? And you can't sell those foods with these warning labels to kids in schools. So, it really has even a broader impact than just the behavior change you see from the labeling, and so many other countries have followed suit. Mexico has a very similar labeling system. One thing that they've learned from Chile is, and this is a concern, that as the industry brings down the levels of sugar, for example, in foods in response to labeling, they're increasing the levels of non-sugar sweeteners, right? Things like Sucralose or Stevia or monk fruit, and so that's a worry. Mexico has, in addition, also labeled those non-sugar sweeteners on the food packaging. And then you see other examples. France has a really nice system. It's called Nutri-Score. Very intuitive. There are letter grades. I myself had the chance to go to France. I was trying to buy some turkey for my son. I don't speak a bit of French, and I'm standing in the supermarket and I just see the letter grade A and I think, oh, okay, I'll pick that one.   Great, great example. Yes, very intuitive systems around the world. So, are there studies showing which of these systems work and what sort of effects they have? And I know you've done additional work beyond what you mentioned earlier. Absolutely, and there are a whole range of studies, whether they're randomized controlled trials, lab studies, or online experiments. And then the more compelling, convincing evidence, which comes from natural experiments that are done around the globe, or even research we have from stores that have voluntary implemented these labels and we can look at changes in sales data. And what all that boils down to is labeling will produce behavioral effects. They will get people to purchase healthier foods, they will get people to purchase less of the unhealthy foods. Labels inform consumers, which I think is kind of the first order goal, right? Like let's just make sure people understand what's in the food supply, and then we see this reformulation. And that's been true, even if you look back to trans fat labeling, like requiring trans fat on the labels was also associated with trans fat coming out of the food supply. So, I think we can feel really good and solid that labeling can help people make healthier choices. And as anyone who's worked on issues related to chronic diseases, we're going to need a suite of policies, right? Labels are never going to be the silver bullet. They're not designed to be, but it's a policy that makes a lot of sense. It's a very cost effective policy. It's not very expensive to do labeling, and it can help support many other policies that might produce bigger effects. So, given the different options, the different kind of systems that have been proposed or are out there in use, do you have a sense of what ultimately might be the best system? I think the FDA has some good options in front of them. Now, if I were to wave a magic wand, I would do warning labels. I would make them more similar to what's done in Chile, just because we have good evidence that warnings in particular, and these kinds of symbols like a stop sign, are probably going to be more effective at educating consumers and shaping behavior. Now, that being said, we have some unique legal challenges in the US for getting a system like that. The FDA is proposing, I think, a totally reasonable, science-based label that essentially would have what it's high in and then indicate whether it's high in added sugar or saturated fat or sodium. I would love to see that label also have some sort of icons, some eye-catching exclamation point or something like that, but that label is great, it's a great option. Let's compare it now to what the industry is pushing for, which is basically what we have now, facts upfront. And as I said earlier, this is a label that has percent daily values, that has grams, that has milligrams, that can highlight positive nutrients that are going to appear on unhealthy foods. I think when you look at those two options, it's just a no-brainer to go with this very simple, very straightforward, high-end label that lists the nutrients and let's put some sort of icon on it. So are you optimistic about where things might go? Well, I'm a glass half full kind of person. I would say yes, I try to be very optimistic, but I think there's reason to be. I think we have some good options on the table, FDA is moving forward, research is being done, scientists and others are highly engaged in this process and giving feedback to FDA. And so many other countries have done this. So yes, I am feeling optimistic. So at the end of the day, a lot of this will come down to how much the FDA can resist pressure from the food industry. Right, so many things in food policy do come down to that. That's really true. So true. It's interesting, one of the things that you highlighted, but I'd like to even bring a little more attention to is the issue of the industry reformulating its products so that they don't have to show these negative labels. That's such a potentially powerful public health consequence of this, that it needs to be focused on even more. I'm hoping the valuations are being done of the impact of that on public health. Because you can make an argument, couldn't you, that if these labels don't affect the purchasing behavior of a single individual, they still could have enormous public health benefit just because of the reformulation, do you agree? Oh, 100%. Yes, absolutely. I would even argue that we have very few mechanisms to hold industry accountable, and to me is just a fundamental right of consumers. Like they have the right to know, there needs to be transparency, and great that they are likely to produce behavior change and great that they are likely to make the industry reformulate, but I just feel like that there's so many reasons to do labeling that it just feels like an obvious policy to pursue. Hopefully, any system that comes into place can be nimble as much as they can be in these government regulations to take into account new science that occurs. Like at some point, maybe a symbol that notes whether a product is ultra processed would be in order, or as you said, in France, I think it was, where they've labeled the addition of the artificial sweeteners. Was it France or was it another place? Mexico. Yes. That's right. Okay. Yeah, thanks for clearing that up. Something like that might enter the system, so having a system that can adjust to the science as it goes forward would be really important too. Kelly, it's such an important point. I think part of any labeling strategy needs to be monitoring and evaluation, and particularly with the non-sugar substitutes. Like right now, we don't know, it's a very hard thing to track. It's only on the ingredient list. We can't quantify how much is in the food supply. And so I would love to see coupled with labeling some way that that gets disclosed so we can really monitor and ensure how that might be changing in the food supply over time and evaluate, to your point, what's happening in terms of reformulation. As an aside, we've done a cluster of podcasts on the influence of these artificial sweeteners and the sugar substitutes and the available science on this, on what goes on in the brain, what happens to the microbiome, the impact of health overall is really concerning, so I totally agree with you that having that information disclosed could be really helpful. Yes, 100%.     BIO Christina A. Roberto, PhD is the Mitchell J. Blutt and Margo Krody Blutt Presidential Associate Professor of Health Policy at the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania. She is also an Associate Director of the Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics (CHIBE) at Penn. Dr. Roberto is a psychologist and epidemiologist who studies policies and interventions to promote healthy eating habits and help create a more equitable and just food system. In her work, she draws upon the fields of psychology, behavioral economics, epidemiology, and public health to answer research questions that provide policymakers and institutions with science-based guidance. Dr. Roberto earned a joint-PhD at Yale University in Clinical psychology and Chronic Disease Epidemiology. Dr. Roberto completed her clinical internship at the Yale School of Medicine and was a Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Health and Society Scholar at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health.