Podcasts about vaccinate

My fellow pro-growth/progress/abundance Up Wingers,Global population growth is slowing, and it's not showing any signs of recovery. To the environmentalists of the 1970s, this may have seemed like a movement in the right direction. The drawbacks to population decline, however, are severe and numerous, and they're not all obvious.Today on Faster, Please! — The Podcast, I talk with economist and demographer Dean Spears about the depopulation trend that is transcending cultural barriers and ushering in a new global reality. We discuss the costs to the economy and human progress, and the inherent value of more people.Spears is an associate professor of economics at Princeton University where he studies demography and development. He is also the founding executive director of r.i.c.e., a nonprofit research organization seeking to uplift children in rural northern India. He is a co-author with Michael Geruso of After the Spike: Population, Progress, and the Case for People.In This Episode* Where we're headed (1:32)* Pumping the breaks (5:41)* A pro-parenting culture (12:40)* A place for AI (19:13)* Preaching to the pro-natalist choir (23:40)* Quantity and quality of life (28:48)Below is a lightly edited transcript of our conversation. Where we're headed (1:32). . . two thirds of people now live in a country where the birth rate is below the two children per two adults level that would stabilize the population.Pethokoukis: Who are you and your co-author trying to persuade and what are you trying to persuade them of? Are you trying to persuade them that global depopulation is a real thing, that it's a problem? Are you trying to persuade them to have more kids? Are you trying to persuade them to support a certain set of pro-child or pro-natalist policies?Spears: We are trying to persuade quite a lot of people of two important things: One is that global depopulation is the most likely future — and what global depopulation means is that every decade, every generation, the world's population will shrink. That's the path that we're on. We're on that path because birth rates are low and falling almost everywhere. It's one thing we're trying to persuade people of, that fact, and we're trying to persuade people to engage with a question of whether global depopulation is a future to welcome or whether we should want something else to happen. Should we let depopulation happen by default or could it be better to stabilize the global population at some appropriate level instead?We fundamentally think that this is a question that a much broader section of society, of policy discourse, of academia should be talking about. We shouldn't just be leaving this discussion to the population scientists, demographic experts, not only to the people who already are worried about, or talking about low birth rates, but this is important enough and unprecedented enough that everybody should be engaging in this question. Whatever your ongoing values or commitments, there's a place for you in this conversation.Is it your impression that the general public is aware of this phenomenon? Or are they still stuck in the '70s thinking that population is running amok and we'll have 30 billion people on this planet like was the scenario in the famous film, Soylent Green? I feel like the people I know are sort of aware that this is happening. I don't know what your experience is.I think it's changing fast. I think more and more people are aware that birth rates are falling. I don't think that people are broadly aware — because when you hear it in the news, you might hear that birth rates in the United States have fallen low or birth rates in South Korea have fallen low. I think what not everybody knows is that two thirds of people now live in a country where the birth rate is below the two children per two adults level that would stabilize the population.I think people don't know that the world's birth rate has fallen from an average around five in 1950 to about 2.3 today, and that it's still falling and that people just haven't engaged with the thought that there's no special reason to expect it to stop and hold it to. But the same processes that have been bringing birth rates down will continue to bring them down, and people don't know that there's no real automatic stabilizer to expect it to come back up. Of the 26 countries that have had the lifetime birth rate fall below 1.9, none of them have had it go back up to two.That's a lot of facts that are not as widely known as they should be, but then the implication of it, that if the world's birth rate goes below two and stays there, we're going to have depopulation generation after generation. I think for a lot of people, they're still in the mindset that depopulation is almost conceptually impossible, that either we're going to have population growth or something else like zero population growth like people might've talked about in the '70s. But the idea that a growth rate of zero is just a number and then that it's not going to stop there, it's going to go negative, I think that's something that a lot of people just haven't thought about.Pumping the breaks (5:41)We wrote this book because we hope that there will be an alternative to depopulation society will choose, but there's no reason to expect or believe that it's going happen automatically.You said there's no automatic stabilizers — at first take, that sounds like we're going to zero. Is there a point where the global population does hit a stability point?No, that's just the thing.So we're going to zero?Well, “there's no automatic stabilizer” isn't the same thing as “we're definitely going to zero.” It could be that society comes together and decides to support parenting, invest more in the next generation, invest more in parents and families, and do more to help people choose to be parents. We wrote this book because we hope that there will be an alternative to depopulation society will choose, but there's no reason to expect or believe that it's going happen automatically. In no country where the birth rate has gone to two has it just magically stopped and held there forever.I think a biologist might say that the desire to reproduce, that's an evolved drive, and even if right now we're choosing to have smaller families, that biological urge doesn't vanish. We've had population, fertility rates, rise and fall throughout history — don't you think that there is some sort of natural stabilizer?We've had fluctuations throughout history, but those fluctuations have been around a pretty long and pretty widely-shared downward trend. Americans might be mostly only now hearing about falling birth rates because the US was sort of anomalous amongst richer countries and having a relatively flat period from the 1970s to around 2010 or so, whereas birth rates were falling in other countries, they weren't falling in the US in the same way, but they were falling in the US before then, they're falling in the US since then, and when you plot it over the long history with other countries, it's clear that, for the world as a whole, as long as we've had records, not just for decades, but for centuries, we've seen birth rates be falling. It's not just a new thing, it's a very long-term trend.It's a very widely-shared trend because humans are unlike other animals in the important way that we make decisions. We have culture, we have rationality, we have irrationality, we have all of these. The reason the population grew is because we've learned how to keep ourselves and our children alive. We learned how to implement sanitation, implement antibiotics, implement vaccines, and so more of the children who were born survived even as the birth rate was falling all along. Other animals don't do that. Other animals don't invent sanitation systems and antibiotics and so I think that we can't just reason immediately from other animal populations to what's going to happen to humans.I think one can make a plausible case that, even if you think that this is a problem — and again, it's a global problem, or a global phenomenon, advanced countries, less-advanced countries — that it is a phenomenon of such sweep that if you're going to say we need to stabilize or slow down, that it would take a set of policies of equal sweep to counter it. Do those actually exist?No. Nobody has a turnkey solution. There's nothing shovel-ready here. In fact, it's too early to be talking about policy solutions or “here's my piece of legislation, here's what the government should do” because we're just not there yet, both in terms of the democratic process of people understanding the situation and there even being a consensus that stabilization, at some level, would be better than depopulation, nor are we there yet on having any sort of answer that we can honestly recommend as being tested and known to be something that will reliably stabilize the population.I think the place to start is by having conversations like this one where we get people to engage with the evidence, and engage with the question, and just sort of move beyond a reflexive welcoming of depopulation by default and start thinking about, well, what are the costs of people and what are the benefits of people? Would we be better off in a future that isn't depopulating over the long run?The only concrete step I can think of us taking right now is adapting the social safety net to a new demographic reality. Beyond that, it seems like there might have to be a cultural shift of some kind, like a large-scale religious revival. Or maybe we all become so rich that we have more time on our hands and decide to have more kids. But do you think at some point someone will have a concrete solution to bring global fertility back up to 2.1 or 2.2?Look at it like this: The UN projects that the peak will be about six decades from now in 2084. Of course, I don't have a crystal ball, I don't know that it's going to be 2084, but let's take that six-decades timeline seriously because we're not talking about something that's going to happen next year or even next decade.But six decades ago, people were aware that — or at least leading scientists and even some policymakers were aware that climate change was a challenge. The original computations by Arrhenius of the radiative forcing were long before that. You have the Johnson speech to Congress, you have Nixon and the EPA. People were talking about climate change as a challenge six decades ago, but if somebody had gotten on their equivalent of a podcast and said, “What we need to do is immediately get rid of the internal combustion engine,” they would've been rightly laughed out of the room because that would've been the wrong policy solution at that time. That would've been jumping to the wrong solution. Instead, what we needed to do was what we've done, which is the science, the research, the social change that we're now at a place where emissions per person in the US have been falling for 20 years and we have technologies — wind, and solar, and batteries — that didn't exist before because there have been decades of working on it.So similarly, over the next six decades, let's build the research, build the science, build the social movement, discover things we don't know, more social science, more awareness, and future people will know more than you and I do about what might be constructive responses to this challenge, but only if we start talking about it now. It's not a crisis to panic about and do the first thing that comes to mind. This is a call to be more thoughtful about the future.A pro-parenting culture (12:40)The world's becoming more similar in this important way that the difference across countries and difference across societies is getting smaller as birth rates converge downward.But to be clear, you would like people to have more kids.I would like for us to get on a path where more people who want to be parents have the sort of support, and environment, and communities they need to be able to choose that. I would like people to be thinking about all of this when they make their family decisions. I'd like the rest of us to be thinking about this when we pitch in and do more to help us. I don't think that anybody's necessarily making the wrong decision for themselves if they look around and think that parenting is not for them or having more children is not for them, but I think we might all be making a mistake if we're not doing more to support parents or to recognize the stake we have in the next generation.But all those sorts of individual decisions that seem right for an individual or for a couple, combined, might turn into a societal decision.Absolutely. I'm an economics professor. We call this “externalities,” where there are social benefits of something that are different from the private costs and benefits. If I decide that I want to drive and I contribute to traffic congestion, then that's an externality. At least in principle, we understand what to do about that: You share the cost, you share the benefits, you help the people internalize the social decision.It's tied up in the fact that we have a society where some people we think of as doing care work and some people we think of as doing important work. So we've loaded all of these costs of making the next generation on people during the years of their parenting and especially on women and mothers. It's understandable that, from a strictly economic point of view, somebody looks at that and thinks, “The private costs are greater than the private benefits. I'm not going to do that.” It's not my position to tell somebody that they're wrong about that. What you do in a situation like that is share and lighten that burden. If there's a social reason to solve traffic congestion, then you solve it with public policy over the long run. If the social benefits of there being a flourishing next generation are greater than people are finding in their own decision making, then we need to find the ways to invest in families, invest in parenting, lift and share those burdens so that people feel like they can choose to be parents.I would think there's a cultural component here. I am reminded of a book by Jonathan Last about this very issue in which he talks about Old Town Alexandria here in Virginia, how, if you go to Old Town, you can find lots of stores selling stuff for dogs, but if you want to buy a baby carriage, you can't find anything.Of course, that's an equilibrium outcome, but go on.If we see a young couple pushing a stroller down the street and inside they have a Chihuahua — as society, or you personally, would you see that and “Think that's wrong. That seems like a young couple living in a nice area, probably have plenty of dough, they can afford daycare, and yet they're still not going to have a kid and they're pushing a dog around a stroller?” Should we view that as something's gone wrong with our society?My own research is about India. My book's co-authored with Mike Geruso. He studies the United States more. I'm more of an expert on India.Paul Ehrlich, of course, begins his book, The Population Bomb, in India.Yes, I know. He starts with this feeling of being too crowded with too many people. I say in the book that I almost wonder if I know the exact spot where he has that experience. I think it's where one of my favorite shops are for buying scales and measuring tape for measuring the health of children in Uttar Pradesh. But I digress about Paul Ehrlich.India now, where Paul Ehrlich was worried about overpopulation, is now a society with an average birth rate below two kids per two adults. Even Uttar Pradesh, the big, disadvantaged, poor state where I do my work in research, the average young woman there says that they want an average of 1.9 children. This is a place where society and culture is pretty different from the United States. In the US, we're very accustomed to this story of work and family conflict, and career conflicts, especially for women, and that's probably very important in a lot of people's lives. But that's not what's going on in India where female labor force participation is pretty low. Or you hear questions about whether this is about the decline of religiosity, but India is a place where religion is still very important to a lot of people's lives. Marriage is almost universal. Marriage happens early. People start their childbearing careers in their early twenties, and you still see people having an average below two kids. They start childbearing young and they end childbearing young.Similarly, in Latin America, where religiosity, at least as reported in surveys, remains pretty high, but Latin America is at an average of 1.8, and it's not because people are delaying fertility until they're too old to get pregnant. You see a lot of people having permanent contraception surgery, tubal obligations.And so this cultural story where people aren't getting married, they're starting too late, they're putting careers first, it doesn't match the worldwide diversity. These diverse societies we're seeing are all converging towards low birth rates. The world's becoming more similar in this important way that the difference across countries and difference across societies is getting smaller as birth rates converge downward. So I don't think we can easily point towards any one cultural for this long-term and widely shared trend.A place for AI (19:13)If AI in the future is a compliment to what humans produce . . . if AI is making us more productive, then it's all the bigger loss to have fewer people.At least from an economic perspective, I think you can make the case: fewer people, less strain on resources, you're worried about workers, AI-powered robots are going to be doing a lot of work, and if you're worried about fewer scientists, the scientists we do have are going to have AI-powered research assistants.Which makes the scientists more important. Many technologies over history have been compliments to what humans do, not substitutes. If AI in the future is a compliment to what humans produce — scientific research or just the learning by doing that people do whenever they're engaging in an enterprise or trying to create something — if AI is making us more productive, then it's all the bigger loss to have fewer people.To me, the best of both worlds would be to have even more scientists plus AI. But isn't the fear of too few people causing a labor shortage sort of offset by AI and robotics? Maybe we'll have plenty of technology and capital to supply the workers we do have. If that's not the worry, maybe the worry is that the human experience is simply worse when there are fewer children around.You used the term “plenty of,” and I think that sort of assumes that there's a “good enough,” and I want to push back on that because I think what matters is to continue to make progress towards higher living standards, towards poverty alleviation, towards longer, better, healthier, safer, richer lives. What matters is whether we're making as much progress as we could towards an abundant, rich, safe, healthy future. I think we shouldn't let ourselves sloppily accept a concept of “good enough.” If we're not making the sort of progress that we could towards better lives, then that's a loss, and that matters for people all around the world.We're better off for living in a world with other people. Other people are win-win: Their lives are good for them and their lives are good for you. Part of that, as you say, is people on the supply side of the economy, people having the ideas and the realizations that then can get shared over and over again. The fact that ideas are this non-depletable resource that don't get used up but might never be discovered if there aren't people to discover them. That's one reason people are important on the supply side of the economy, but other people are also good for you on the demand side of the economy.This is very surprising because people think that other people are eating your slice of the pie, and if there are more other people, there's less for me. But you have to ask yourself, why does the pie exist in the first place? Why is it worth some baker's while to bake a pie that I could get a slice of? And that's because there were enough people wanting slices of pie to make it worth paying the fixed costs of having a bakery and baking a whole pie.In other words, you're made better off when other people want and need the same things that you want and need because that makes it more likely for it to exist. If you have some sort of specialized medical need and need specialized care, you're going to be more likely to find it in a city where there are more other people than in a less-populated rural place, and you're going to be more likely to find it in a course of history where there have been more other people who have had the same medical need that you do so that it's been worthwhile for some sort of cure to exist. The goodness of other people for you isn't just when they're creating things, it's also when they're just needing the same things that you do.And, of course, if you think that getting to live a good life is a good thing, that there's something valuable about being around to have good experiences, that a world of more people having good experiences has more goodness in it than a world of fewer people having good experiences in it. That's one thing that counts, and it's one important consideration for why a stabilized future might be better than a depopulating future. Now, I don't expect everyone to immediately agree with that, but I do think that the likelihood of depopulation should prompt us to ask that question.Preaching to the pro-natalist choir (23:40)If you are already persuaded listening to this, then go strike up a conversation with somebody.Now, listening to what you just said, which I thought was fantastic, you're a great explainer, that is wonderful stuff — but I couldn't help but think, as you explained that, that you end up spending a lot of time with people who, because they read the New York Times, they may understand that the '70s population fears aren't going to happen, that we're not going to have a population of 30 billion that we're going to hit, I don't know, 10 billion in the 2060s and then go down. And they think, “Well, that's great.”You have to spend a lot of time explaining to them about the potential downsides and why people are good, when like half the population in this country already gets it: “You say ‘depopulation,' you had us at the word, ‘depopulation.'” You have all these people who are on the right who already think that — a lot of people I know, they're there.Is your book an effective tool to build on that foundation who already think it's an issue, are open to policy ideas, does your book build on that or offer anything to those people?I think that, even if this is something that people have thought about before, a lot of how people have thought about it is in terms of pension plans, the government's budget, the age structure, the nearer-term balance of workers to retirees.There's plenty of people on the right who maybe they're aware of those things, but also think that it really is kind of a The Children of Men argument. They just think a world with more children is better. A world where the playgrounds are alive is better — and yes, that also may help us with social security, but there's a lot of people for whom you don't have to even make that economic argument. That seems to me that that would be a powerful team of evangelists — and I mean it in a nonreligious way — evangelists for your idea that population is declining and there are going to be some serious side effects.If you are already persuaded listening to this, then go strike up a conversation with somebody. That's what we want to have happen. I think minds are going to be changed in small batches on this one. So if you're somebody who already thinks this way, then I encourage you to go out there and start a conversation. I think not everybody, even people who think about population for a living — for example, one of the things that we engage with in the book is the philosophy of population ethics, or population in social welfare as economists might talk about it.There have been big debates there over should we care about average wellbeing? Should we care about total wellbeing? Part of what we're trying to say in the book is, one, we think that some of those debates have been misplaced or are asking what we don't think are the right questions, but also to draw people to what we can learn from thinking of where questions like this agree. Because this whole question of should we make the future better in total or make the better on average is sort of presuming this Ehrlich-style mindset that if the future is more populous, then it must be worse for each. But once you see that a future that's more populous is also more prosperous, it'd be better in total and better on average, then a lot of these debates might still have academic interest, but both ways of thinking about what would be a better future agree.So there are these pockets of people out there who have thought about this before, and part of what we're trying to do is bring them together in a unified conversation where we're talking about the climate modeling, we're talking about the economics, we're talking about the philosophy, we're talking about the importance of gender equity and reproductive freedom, and showing that you can think and care about all of these things and still think that a stabilized future might be better than depopulation.In the think tank world, the dream is to have an idea and then some presidential candidate adopts the idea and pushes it forward. There's a decent chance that the 2028 Republican nominee is already really worried about this issue, maybe someone like JD Vance. Wouldn't that be helpful for you?I've never spoken with JD Vance, but from my point of view, I would also be excited for India's population to stabilize and not depopulate. I don't see this as an “America First” issue because it isn't an America First issue. It's a worldwide, broadly-shared phenomenon. I think that no one country is going to be able to solve this all on its own because, if nothing else, people move, people immigrate, societies influence one another. I think it's really a broadly-shared issue.Quantity and quality of life (28:48)What I do feel confident about is that some stabilized size would be better than depopulation generation after generation, after generation, after generation, without any sort of leveling out, and I think that's the plan that we're on by default.Can you imagine an earth of 10 to 12 billion people at a sustained level being a great place to live, where everybody is doing far better than they are today, the poorest countries are doing better — can you imagine that scenario? Can you also imagine a scenario where we have a world of three to four billion, which is a way nicer place to live for everybody than it is today? Can both those scenarios happen?I don't see any reason to think that either of those couldn't be an equilibrium, depending on all the various policy choices and all the various . . .This is a very broad question.Exactly. I think it's way beyond the social science, economics, climate science we have right now to say “three billion is the optimal size, 10 billion is the optimal size, eight billion is the optimal size.” What I do feel confident about is that some stabilized size would be better than depopulation generation after generation, after generation, after generation, without any sort of leveling out, and I think that's the plan that we're on by default. That doesn't mean it's what's going to happen, I hope it's not what happens, and that's sort of the point of the conversation here to get more people to consider that.But let's say we were able to stabilize the population at 11 billion. That would be fine.It could be depending on what the people do.But I'm talking about a world of 11 billion, and I'm talking about a world where the average person in India is as wealthy as, let's say this is in the year 2080, 2090, and at minimum, the average person in India is as wealthy as the average American is today. So that's a big huge jump in wealth and, of course, environmentalism.And we make responsible environmental choices, whether that's wind, or solar, or nuclear, or whatever, I'm not going to be prescriptive on that, but I don't see any reason why not. My hope is that future people will know more about that question than I do. Ehrlich would've said that our present world of eight billion would be impossible, that we would've starved long before this, that England would've ceased to exist, I think is a prediction in his book somewhere.And there's more food per person on every continent. Even in the couple decades that I've been going to India, children are taller than they used to be, on average. You can measure it, and maybe I'm fooling myself, but I feel like I can see it. Even as the world's been growing more populous, people have been getting better off, poverty has been going down, the absolute number of people in extreme poverty has been going down, even as the world's been getting more populous. As I say, emissions per person have been going down in a lot of places.I don't see any in principle, reason, if people make the right decisions, that we couldn't have a sustainable, healthy, and good, large sustained population. I've got two kids and they didn't add to the hole in the ozone layer, which I would've heard about in school as a big problem in the '80s. They didn't add to acid rain. Why not? Because the hole in the ozone layer was confronted with the Montreal Protocol. The acid rain was confronted with the Clean Air Act. They don't drive around in cars with leaded gasoline because in the '70s, the gasoline was unleaded. Adding more people doesn't have to make things worse. It depends on what happens. Again, I hope future people will know more about this than I do, but I don't see any, in principle reason why we couldn't stabilize at a size larger than today and have it be a healthy, and sustainable, and flourishing society.On sale everywhere The Conservative Futurist: How To Create the Sci-Fi World We Were PromisedMicro Reads▶ Economics* Generative AI's Impact on Student Achievement and Implications for Worker Productivity - SSRN* The Real China Model: Beijing's Enduring Formula for Wealth and Power - FA* What Matters More to the Stock Market? The Fed or Nvidia? - NYT* AI Isn't Really Stealing Jobs Yet. That Doesn't Mean We're Ready for It. - Barron's* Trump's Attacks on the Fed and BLS Threaten Key Source of Economic Strength - NYT* A Stock Market Crash Foretold - PS* The Macro Impact of AI on GDP - The Overshoot* Powell Sends Strongest Signal Yet That Interest Rate Cuts Are Coming - NYT* Big Announcements, Small Results: FDI Falls Yet Again - ITIF▶ Business* An MIT report that 95% of AI pilots fail spooked investors. But the reason why those pilots failed is what should make the C-suite anxious - Fortune* Alexandr Wang is now leading Meta's AI dream team. Will Mark Zuckerberg's big bet pay off? - Fortune* Amazon is betting on agents to win the AI race - The Verge* Intuit Earnings Beat Estimates as Company Focuses on Artificial Intelligence Growth Drivers - Barron's* Will Tesla Robotaxis Kill Auto Insurers? Hardly. - Barron's* Wall Street Is Too Complex to Be Left to Humans - Bberg Opinion* Meta Freezes AI Hiring After Blockbuster Spending Spree - WSJ* Trump Is Betting Big on Intel. Will the Chips Fall His Way? - Wired* Trump Says Intel Has Agreed to Give the US 10% Equity Stake - Bberg▶ Policy/Politics* Poll shows California policy influencers want harsher social media laws than voters - Politico* How Trump Will Decide Which Chips Act Companies Must Give Up Equity - WSJ* This Democrat Thinks Voters Seeking Order Will Make or Break Elections - WSJ* California Republicans trust tech companies as much as Trump on AI - Politico* The Japanese city betting on immigrants to breathe life into its economy - FT▶ AI/Digital* AI Is Designing Bizarre New Physics Experiments That Actually Work - Wired* Generative AI in Higher Education: Evidence from an Elite College - SSRN* AI Unveils a Major Discovery in Ancient Microbes That Could Hold the Key to Next Generation Antibiotics - The Debrief* A.I. May Be Just Kind of Ordinary - NYT Opinion* Is the AI bubble about to pop? Sam Altman is prepared either way. - Ars* China's DeepSeek quietly releases an open-source rival to GPT-5—optimized for Chinese chips and priced to undercut OpenAI - Fortune* The world should prepare for the looming quantum era - FT* Brace for a crash before the golden age of AI - FT* How AI will change the browser wars - FT* Can We Tell if ChatGPT is a Parasite? Studying Human-AI Symbiosis with Game Theory - Arxiv* Apple Explores Using Google Gemini AI to Power Revamped Siri - Bberg* The AI Doomers Are Getting Doomier - The Atlantic* State of AI in Business 2025 - MIT NANDA* Silicon Valley Is Drifting Out of Touch With the Rest of America - NYT Opinion* What Workers Really Want from Artificial Intelligence - Stanford HAI▶ Biotech/Health* A 1990 Measles Outbreak Shows How the Disease Can Roar Back - NYT* Corporate egg freezing won't break the glass ceiling - FT* How to Vaccinate the World - Asterisk* COVID Revisionism Has Gone Too Far - MSN* Securing America's Pharmaceutical Innovation Edge - JAMA Forum▶ Clean Energy/Climate* Trump's Global War on Decarbonization - PS* Aalo Atomics secures funding to build its first reactor - WNN* Trump's nuclear policy favors startups, widening industry rifts - E&E* How Electricity Got So Expensive - Heatmap* Nuclear fusion gets a boost from a controversial debunked experiment - NS* Google Wants You to Know the Environmental Cost of Quizzing Its AI - WSJ* Trump Blamed Rising Electricity Prices on Renewables. It's Not True. - Heatmap* Trump's Cuts May Spell the End for America's Only Antarctic Research Ship - NYT* How Bill McKibben Lost the Plot - The New Atlantis* Does it make sense for America to keep subsidising a sinking city? - Economist▶ Robotics/Drones/AVs* I'm a cyclist. Will the arrival of robotaxis make my journeys safer? - NS* Si chiplet–controlled 3D modular microrobots with smart communication in natural aqueous environments - Science▶ Space/Transportation* On the ground in Ukraine's largest Starlink repair shop - MIT* Trump can't stop America from building cheap EVs - Vox* SpaceX has built the machine to build the machine. But what about the machine? - Ars* 'Invasion' Season 3 showrunner Simon Kinberg on creating ''War of the Worlds' meets 'Babel'' (exclusive) - Space▶ Up Wing/Down Wing* The era of the public apology is ending - Axios* Warren Brodey, 101, Dies; a Visionary at the Dawn of the Information Age - NYT* Reality is evil - Aeon* The Case for Crazy Philanthropy - Palladium▶ Substacks/Newsletters* Claude Code is growing crazy fast, and it's not just for writing code - AI Supremacy* No, ‘the Economists' Didn't Botch Trump's Tariffs - The Dispatch* How Does the US Use Water? - Construction Physics* A Climate-Related Financial Risk Boondoggle - The Ecomodernist* What's up with the States? - Hyperdimensional▶ Social Media* On why AI won't take all the jobs - @Dan_Jeffries1* On four nuclear reactors to be built in Amarillo, TX - @NuclearHazelnut* On AI welfare and consciousness - @sebkrier Faster, Please! is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit fasterplease.substack.com/subscribe

Ever paused at a vaccine insert, googled an ingredient, or felt torn between fear and science? Dr. Elisabeth Marnik (@sciencewhizliz) wasn't vaccinated as a child. She grew up in an anti-vax household—but today, she's a scientist, professor, and mom who vaccinates her own children and helps others feel informed, not fearful.

In a rare blistering take down of "medicine" and "science," HHS Secretary RFK Jr pulls the plug on the obscenely unethical compensation of doctors who push vaccines on their patients receive - without doing any research or asking critical questions about safety. What he says about the HPV vaccine is something ALL parents need to hear. Jasmine Crockett slides deeper into the sewer and a brilliant Miranda Devine Op/Ed on why all the players who were weaponized against Trump and now feeling his crosshairs.

“Whether it's a pet cat, a feral cat, or a wildcat—they all deserve care and respect. TNVR isn't just about controlling populations; it's about preserving a legacy.” This episode is sponsored-in-part by Maddie's Fund and the Rescue Cleaners and Disinfectants. In this compelling episode of the Community Cats Podcast, host Stacy LeBaron speaks with Lara Semple, field team member of the Royal Zoological Society of Scotland's “Saving Wildcats” project. Based at the Highland Wildlife Park, this initiative is leading the charge in restoring the critically endangered European wildcat to the Scottish Highlands. Lara shares her lifelong passion for feline welfare, tracing her journey from growing up in a boarding cattery to spearheading cutting-edge conservation work. She dives into the complexities of hybridization between wild and domestic cats, the challenges of reintroducing a species on the brink of extinction, and how their team uses GPS collars, soft-release techniques, and intensive field monitoring to give wildcats a fighting chance. Listeners will also learn how TNVR (Trap, Neuter, Vaccinate, Return) practices are strategically used to prevent genetic dilution from domestic cats, a major threat to wildcat survival. Lara explains the licensing hurdles, community outreach, and behavioral assessments involved in identifying and managing feral cat populations. This episode is a must-listen for anyone interested in conservation, community cat management, and the delicate dance of coexistence between humans and wildlife. It's an inspiring look at science, compassion, and collaboration at work in one of the UK's most rugged and breathtaking landscapes. Press Play Now For: How European wildcats differ from domestic cats—and why it matters The story of Craig, a legendary feral cat with a 10 km² territory What it takes to breed and reintroduce wildcats into the Highlands How TNVR fits into saving a species from genetic extinction Strategies to mitigate conflict between wildcats and rural communities The unexpected challenges of identifying "owned" outdoor cats Resources & Links: Saving Wildcats Project Website (https://www.savingwildcats.org.uk/) Royal Zoological Society of Scotland (https://www.rzss.org.uk/) Cats Protection (UK) (https://www.cats.org.uk/) Highland Wildlife Park (https://www.highlandwildlifepark.org.uk/) Sponsor Links: Maddie's Fund (https://www.communitycatspodcast.com/maddies623) Rescue Cleaners and Disinfectants (https://www.communitycatspodcast.com/virox) Follow & Review We'd love for you to follow us if you haven't yet. Click that purple '+' in the top right corner of your Apple Podcasts app. We'd love it even more if you could drop a review or 5-star rating over on Apple Podcasts(https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-community-cats-podcast/id1125752101?mt=2). Select “Ratings and Reviews” and “Write a Review” then share a quick line with your favorite part of the episode. It only takes a second and it helps spread the word about the podcast.

Angel Studios https://Angel.com/ToddJoin the Angel Guild today and stream Testament, a powerful new series featuring the retelling of the book of Acts. Alan's Soaps https://www.AlansArtisanSoaps.comUse coupon code TODD to save an additional 10% off the bundle price.Bioptimizers https://Bioptimizers.com/toddEnter promo code TODD to get 10% off your order of Berberine Breakthrough today.Bizable https://GoBizable.comUntie your business exposure from your personal exposure with BiZABLE.  Schedule your FREE consultation at GoBizAble.com today.  Bonefrog https://BonefrogCoffee.com/toddThe new GOLDEN AGE is here!  Use code TODD at checkout to receive 10% off your first purchase and 15% on subscriptions.Bulwark Capital https://KnowYourRiskPodcast.comHear directly from Zach Abraham as he shares insights in this FREE “Halftime” Webinar, THIS Thursday, July 24th at 3:30 Pacific.  Register now at Know Your Risk Podcast dot com. Renue Healthcare https://Renue.Healthcare/ToddYour journey to a better life starts at Renue Healthcare. Visit https://Renue.Healthcare/ToddLISTEN and SUBSCRIBE at:The Todd Herman Show - Podcast - Apple PodcastsThe Todd Herman Show | Podcast on SpotifyWATCH and SUBSCRIBE at: Todd Herman - The Todd Herman Show - YouTubeCode is the new medicine. Silicon valley and big pharma have converged, which is why I still believe that the fight against the medical technocrat elite is the battle of our time.Episode Links:I still stand by my message and my warning, research us before we dieHHS Secretary RFK Jr. announces the Trump administration has rejected U.S. participation in the World Health Organization's IHR regulations and pandemic response measures:The press and others consistently shout out the vaccines are safe and effective. Vaccinate your family … We all vaccinated our families. Everybody sitting here bar two vaccinated their families with catastrophic results. Over 12,000 signatures on those two buses of death, death, death."Emily Tarsell, a retired psychotherapist, stood before Senate to share the heartbreaking story of her daughter, Christina—a vibrant, healthy 20-year-old whose life was cut short by the HPV vaccine.American surgeon records her peer-2-peer call with UnitedHealthcare trying to get a patients surgery approved they deniedThe infamous Letter. ~

Today, we're going to be talking about one of the most taboo and polarizing subjects out there—vaccines. We've had previous guests discuss this topic, but none as balanced, compassionate, and data-driven as today's guest, who presents both sides of this contentious debate. He's a board-certified pediatrician with a background in epidemiology and has become a trusted guide for parents seeking truthful, unbiased, evidence-based support.This is the Story of Between a Shot and a Hard Place with Dr. Joel "Gator" Warsh.   EPISODE HIGHLIGHTS ▪ Watch the Entire Episode ▪ A New Way to Talk About Vaccines: Facts Over Fear ▪ Are Adjuvants in Vaccines Like Aluminum and Thimerosal Toxic? ▪ Why Vaccine Trust Is Eroding: A Call for Better Research ▪ Why More Research Is Needed on Vaccines and Autism ▪ The Truth About Vaccine Studies: Gaps, Assumptions, and Risks ▪ Should Parents Worry About the MMR Vaccine? ▪ Is It Time to Reconsider Our Approach to Vaccination? ▪ Pressure to Vaccinate? How to Handle Pediatric Pushback ▪ How to Reduce Vaccine Risks and More ▪ Honest Answers to the Most Controversial Vaccine Questions CONNECT WITH DR. JOEL "GATOR" WARSH ▪ Website ▪ Instagram ▪ TwitterLEARN MORE ABOUT US ▪ Visit our website to learn more about Innovative Medicine ▪ Take our assessment and set up a free consult to learn more about becoming a patient ▪ Follow Innovative Medicine on Instagram ▪ Subscribe on YouTube ▪ ‘Your Health. Your Story.' Podcast: Follow on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, and Instagram ▪ Follow our podcast host, Caspar Szulc on Instagram ▪ Sign up for Caspar's newsletter LEARN MORE ABOUT NADOVIM Doctor-formulated, clinically-tested NAD+ supplement. Visit our website and save 10% on your first order by using code NADOVIM10. Disclaimer: The content presented on the podcast is for informational purposes only and is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease.

About this episode: For mothers questioning whether or not to vaccinate their children, the decision can be complicated by an overwhelming and, at times, conflicting information environment. In this episode: Health communication researcher Melissa Carrion explores how an onslaught of messaging is informing how mothers decide to vaccinate their kids and how public health experts can better communicate on these key decisions. Guest: Melissa Carrion, PhD, is an assistant professor of Writing and Rhetoric at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, where she researches rhetoric and health communication. Host: Lindsay Smith Rogers, MA, is the producer of the Public Health On Call podcast, an editor for Expert Insights, and the director of content strategy for the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. Show links and related content: How one mom is navigating vaccines' uncertain future—ScienceNews New Research: Childhood Vaccination Rates Drop Across 1,600 U.S. Counties—The 74 "I Don't Understand How These Two Things Go Together": Toward a Theory of Risk Ecologies—Health Communication “You need to do your research”: Vaccines, contestable science, and maternal epistemology—Public Understanding of Science Transcript information: Looking for episode transcripts? Open our podcast on the Apple Podcasts app (desktop or mobile) or the Spotify mobile app to access an auto-generated transcript of any episode. Closed captioning is also available for every episode on our YouTube channel. Contact us: Have a question about something you heard? Looking for a transcript? Want to suggest a topic or guest? Contact us via email or visit our website. Follow us: @‌PublicHealthPod on Bluesky @‌JohnsHopkinsSPH on Instagram @‌JohnsHopkinsSPH on Facebook @‌PublicHealthOnCall on YouTube Here's our RSS feed Note: These podcasts are a conversation between the participants, and do not represent the position of Johns Hopkins University.

Our next guest on A2 THE SHOW is Andrew Wakefield, the former British physician known for his controversial 1998 study suggesting a link between the MMR vaccine and autism. Although the study was later retracted and his medical license revoked, Wakefield remains a prominent voice in the vaccine safety debate.In this episode, Wakefield explains why he wouldn't give his own child vaccines, discusses the risks of the MMR vaccine in young children, and dives into his findings on the gut-brain connection in autism. He also shares how parental testimonies and real-world cases challenged the mainstream narrative, leading him from medicine to filmmaking.⭐Instagram: @andrewjwakefield⭐Please visit our website to get more information: https://a2theshow.com/a2-the-show/⏰Timestamps:00:00 – Introduction07:35 – MMR vaccine risks in young children15:02 – Wakefield's evolving vaccine stance21:54 – Gut-autism link & symptom improvement25:42 – Autism, inflammation, and parental insight30:48 – Autism spectrum & communication35:13 – Diet's impact on behavior42:04 – Funding & research background48:52 – From research to filmmaking

America Out Loud PULSE with Dr. Peter McCullough and Malcolm Out Loud – “Who was really giving the orders on vaccines?” Dr. McCullough said it appears to be someone above Trump and Biden. If Trump wanted to distinguish himself from Sleepy Joe, the boldest move he could make would be to pull the products of the market. Instead, Trump remains...

America Out Loud PULSE with Dr. Peter McCullough and Malcolm Out Loud – “Who was really giving the orders on vaccines?” Dr. McCullough said it appears to be someone above Trump and Biden. If Trump wanted to distinguish himself from Sleepy Joe, the boldest move he could make would be to pull the products of the market. Instead, Trump remains...

Wheeler's 3 very simple rules that could help nearly everybody in the Territory this spring/summer:1: Put out your fires.2: Vaccinate your kids.3: Don't be an idiot.

In this episode, Liz Wheeler breaks down the shocking story of a Massachusetts couple arrested after refusing to vaccinate their children. Is this really what it seems to be? Plus, Liz explains the harrowing story of a British mother who had to spend years in court fighting for her right to reject the COVID jab. And Liz explains the dangers of artificial intelligence after Grok (X and Elon Musk's AI program) labeled her as fake news. Liz also reacts to New York Democrat Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's newest accent. Who does she think she is? Former Vice President Kamala Harris? All that and more! SPONSORS: ALL FAMILY PHARMACY: Because you're part of this movement, use code LIZ10 at checkout for an exclusive discount. Check out https://allfamilypharmacy.com/LIZ, code: LIZ10. PREBORN: Your tax-deductible donation of twenty-eight dollars sponsors one ultrasound and doubles a baby's chance at life. How many babies can you save? Please donate your best gift today– just dial #250 and say the keyword, “BABY" or go to https://preborn.com/LIZ. AMERICAN HARTFORD GOLD: American Hartford Gold: Tell them I sent you, and they'll give you up to $15,000 dollars of FREE silver on your first order. So call them now! Click here https://offers.americanhartfordgold.com/liz or call 866-996-5172 or text LIZ to 998899. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

A safe alternative to clinician-administered tests, the self-test for HPV can help prevent cervical cancer. Synopsis: Every first Wednesday of the month, The Straits Times helps you make sense of health matters that affect you. HPV or the human papillomavirus is a common virus that is sexually transmitted, and while most HPV infections clear on their own, persistent infections with high-risk types can lead to cervical cancer. In March 2025, the Society for Colposcopy & Cervical Pathology of Singapore (SCCPS) published an updated set of national cervical cancer screening guidelines. The guidelines now recommend HPV self-sampling as an option to traditional cervical cancer screening methods. In Singapore, cervical cancer is currently the 11th most common cancer in women, with 309 new cases and 172 deaths in 2023, according to data from the Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO) and the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Information Centre on HPV and Cancer. However, cervical cancer is one of the most preventable and treatable forms of cancer, as long as it is detected early and managed effectively, said the World Health Organisation (WHO). It aims to eliminate cervical cancer as a public health problem by 2030, with the following strategy: Vaccinate 90 per cent of girls with preventive HPV vaccines by age 15; Screen 70 per cent of women with a high-performance test like HPV DNA screening by age 35, and again by age 45; Treat 90 per cent of women who have precancerous cells in the cervix or cervical cancer. In this episode, senior health correspondent Joyce Teo speaks to Dr Felicia Chin, an obstetrician and gynaecological oncologist at Gynae Onco Partners about HPV DNA self-testing, what it entails, and who should screen for cervical cancer. Until late last year, Dr Chin was a senior consultant at KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital. She sits on the SCCPS committee. Highlights (click/tap above) 1:54 Explaining the various tests for cervical cancers 3:14 Guidelines for cervical cancer screening in Singapore 4:32 How does HPV self-sampling work? 5:23 Difference between a self-test and a pap smear 13:42 Cervical cancer symptoms Read Joyce Teo's stories: https://str.sg/JbxN Host: Joyce Teo (joyceteo@sph.com.sg) Produced and edited by: Amirul Karim & Eden Soh Executive producers: Ernest Luis and Lynda Hong Follow Health Check Podcast here and get notified for new episode drops: Channel: https://str.sg/JWaN Apple Podcasts: https://str.sg/JWRX Spotify: https://str.sg/JWaQ Feedback to: podcast@sph.com.sg --- Follow more ST podcast channels: All-in-one ST Podcasts channel: https://str.sg/wvz7 ST Podcasts website: http://str.sg/stpodcasts ST Podcasts YouTube: https://str.sg/4Vwsa --- Get The Straits Times app, which has a dedicated podcast player section: The App Store: https://str.sg/icyB Google Play: https://str.sg/icyX --- #healthcheckSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

A safe alternative to clinician-administered tests, the self-test for HPV can help prevent cervical cancer. Synopsis: Every first Wednesday of the month, The Straits Times helps you make sense of health matters that affect you. HPV or the human papillomavirus is a common virus that is sexually transmitted, and while most HPV infections clear on their own, persistent infections with high-risk types can lead to cervical cancer. In March 2025, the Society for Colposcopy & Cervical Pathology of Singapore (SCCPS) published an updated set of national cervical cancer screening guidelines. The guidelines now recommend HPV self-sampling as an option to traditional cervical cancer screening methods. In Singapore, cervical cancer is currently the 11th most common cancer in women, with 309 new cases and 172 deaths in 2023, according to data from the Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO) and the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Information Centre on HPV and Cancer. However, cervical cancer is one of the most preventable and treatable forms of cancer, as long as it is detected early and managed effectively, said the World Health Organisation (WHO). It aims to eliminate cervical cancer as a public health problem by 2030, with the following strategy: Vaccinate 90 per cent of girls with preventive HPV vaccines by age 15; Screen 70 per cent of women with a high-performance test like HPV DNA screening by age 35, and again by age 45; Treat 90 per cent of women who have precancerous cells in the cervix or cervical cancer. In this episode, senior health correspondent Joyce Teo speaks to Dr Felicia Chin, an obstetrician and gynaecological oncologist at Gynae Onco Partners about HPV DNA self-testing, what it entails, and who should screen for cervical cancer. Until late last year, Dr Chin was a senior consultant at KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital. She sits on the SCCPS committee. Highlights (click/tap above) 1:54 Explaining the various tests for cervical cancers 3:14 Guidelines for cervical cancer screening in Singapore 4:32 How does HPV self-sampling work? 5:23 Difference between a self-test and a pap smear 13:42 Cervical cancer symptoms Read Joyce Teo's stories: https://str.sg/JbxN Host: Joyce Teo (joyceteo@sph.com.sg) Produced and edited by: Amirul Karim & Eden Soh Executive producers: Ernest Luis and Lynda Hong Follow Health Check Podcast here and get notified for new episode drops: Channel: https://str.sg/JWaN Apple Podcasts: https://str.sg/JWRX Spotify: https://str.sg/JWaQ Feedback to: podcast@sph.com.sg --- Follow more ST podcast channels: All-in-one ST Podcasts channel: https://str.sg/wvz7 ST Podcasts website: http://str.sg/stpodcasts ST Podcasts YouTube: https://str.sg/4Vwsa --- Get The Straits Times app, which has a dedicated podcast player section: The App Store: https://str.sg/icyB Google Play: https://str.sg/icyX --- #healthcheckSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

On this week's show, Beth talks with Brianne Barker, Associate Professor of Biology and Director of Undergraduate Research at Drew University. Dr Barker studies innate immune responses – these are the initial, non-specific actions taken by the immune system – to fight off retroviruses such as HIV (the AIDS virus). We discuss the measles virus, … Continue reading "Measles: To Vaccinate or Not?"

Send us a textAre pediatric vaccines as safe and necessary as we've been led to believe? Dr. Robert Jackson challenges conventional wisdom in this eye-opening episode, drawing on his 43 years of medical practice to answer pressing listener questions about childhood immunizations.Drawing back the curtain on vaccine history, Dr. Jackson reveals how measles, mumps, rubella, and other childhood illnesses largely disappeared before vaccines were introduced, thanks to improvements in public sanitation and hygiene. He shares striking statistics about measles - no child deaths in the US for over 20 years and a natural infection mortality risk of just 1 in 105 million, compared to vaccine adverse reaction risks of 1 in 168 children ending up in emergency rooms after their 12-month MMR shot.Most startling is Dr. Jackson's discussion of the MMR-autism connection, citing CDC whistleblower William Thompson who admitted to participating in research fraud by omitting data showing increased autism risk in vaccinated children. "I've heard dozens of mothers tell me their child was developing normally until receiving the MMR vaccine," Dr. Jackson shares, explaining why he advises parents against this particular immunization. He also deconstructs the 2014 Disneyland measles outbreak narrative, revealing that most cases occurred among vaccinated individuals or were caused by the vaccine strain itself.For concerned parents, Dr. Jackson offers practical advice on boosting children's immunity naturally and navigating college or military vaccination requirements through religious exemptions. He recommends resources including Dr. Paul Thomas's book "Vax Facts" and TheHealthyAmerican.com for those seeking exemptions based on First Amendment rights.Want to protect your children while making informed medical decisions? Listen to this episode to discover what the pharmaceutical industry and mainstream medicine aren't telling you about pediatric vaccines and the safer alternatives available.https://www.jacksonfamilyministry.comhttps://bobslone.com/home/podcast-production/

Dr. Paul Alexander Liberty Hour – We are near an H5N1 flu vaccine being deployed, so let us see how Kennedy Jr.'s declaration impacts this. It seems that ‘Elanco Animal Health and Medgene, a South Dakota-based animal health company focusing on vaccine technology, have entered into an agreement that includes the commercialization of a highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) H5N1 vaccine for dairy cattle developed by Medgene...

Vaccinations play an important role in both our individual and community health. They help to prevent serious and sometimes deadly diseases by strengthening our immune system. But in recent years this cost effective method of disease prevention has come under the spot light, drawing attention to some myths and misconceptions. In this episode, Dr Anne von Gottberg dives into the importance of vaccinations, how to handle missed vaccines, vaccine dos and don'ts and recent changes in the Extended Programme onIimmunzation(EPI) in South Africa.About our Guest: Dr Anne von Gottberg is currently the laboratory lead at the Centre for Respiratory Diseases and Meningitis at the National Institute for Communicable Diseases, Johannesburg, South Africa; and Associate Professor within the School of Pathology, Faculty of the Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg; and Honorary Professor, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town. She leads a laboratory team responsible for reference diagnostics for respiratory and meningitis pathogens nationally and regionally. The laboratory is the regional reference laboratory for the World Health Organization (WHO) Vaccine-preventable Invasive Bacterial Diseases (VP-IBD) Coordinated Global Surveillance Network for the southern African region; a National Influenza Centre (NIC); and a global WHO RSV and regional SARS-CoV-2 reference laboratory. She is currently a member of several committees and technical advisory groups for AFRO, Africa CDC and WHO. Her main interests include surveillance for meningitis and respiratory pathogens, assessing vaccine effectiveness where relevant. She has authored or co-authored more than 200 articles in peer-reviewed journals. In addition, she supervises a number of Masters and PhD students. Dr von Gottberg obtained her MBBCh and PhD at the University of the Witwatersrand, and trained for her specialisation in clinical microbiology (FC Path[SA] MICRO) at the National Health Laboratory Service (former South African Institute for Medical Research) and at the University of the Witwatersrand.WE'D LOVE YOUR FEEDBACK ON THIS EPISODE – Visit the Microbe Mail website to sign up for updates Follow on:Instagram: Microbe_MailX/Twitter: @microbemailFacebook: MicrobeMailTiktok: @microbe.mailWatch this episode on our new YouTube channel: Microbe MailE-mail us: mail.microbe@gmail.com

Send us a textWhat if the vaccines meant to protect your child could also pose significant risks? Join Dr. Robert Jackson as he unravels the controversial landscape of pediatric vaccines. We challenge the conventional wisdom surrounding these vaccines, questioning their safety due to the lack of placebo-controlled studies. Dr. Jackson shares his insights on the ramifications of the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, which provided legal immunity to vaccine manufacturers, leading to a spike in vaccine production. Listen as we critically examine the troubling rise in autism rates and discuss Robert F. Kennedy Jr's pivotal role in advocating against pediatric vaccines while unveiling potential conflicts of interest within health organizations.https://www.jacksonfamilyministry.comhttps://bobslone.com/home/podcast-production/

Welcome to "Thriving in Midlife Redefining Aging with Wellness" the podcast where we discuss how to live an extraordinary life in every aspect. I'm your host, Kellie Lupsha, a high-performance health coach, who is delighted to be your guide to vitality.In this episode, we talk about personal health choices and the importance of understanding your body. Dr. Heidi and I explore the blurred lines in health decisions, emphasizing the need for informed, conscious choices tailored to individual needs. Whether you're navigating lifestyle habits, preventive measures, or societal pressures, this episode offers insights to help you take charge of your well-being.Key Highlights:How discussions around vaccines have shifted over time.Why one-size-fits-all approaches may not work for everyone.Key factors to consider before making health-related decisions.How nutrition, rest, and hygiene play a critical role in supporting your immune system.Simple yet impactful ways to create a healthier living space.Breaking free from peer pressure and societal expectations to make decisions that align with your values.Key Takeaways"We can run out and get all the vaccines in the world, but they're not going to protect us as much—or at all—if we don't do these sorts of basics." —Dr. Heidi Iratcabal"You need to be able to understand your own body. Each one of us, our bodies are going through something different at a time. What's okay for me might not be okay for somebody else."—Kellie Lupsha*FREE GIFT

Arizona's largest egg producer has lost more than a million chickens to bird flu as the deadly virus spreads fast. He says the government has to allow them to vaccinate their flocks before it spreads to humans. Plus, the new dean of ASU's Herberger Institute argues for art in today's world.

Featured Guests Brigid Groves, PharmD, MS Mitch Rothholz, RPh, MBA, FAPhA Lucas Berenbrok, PharmD, MS, BCACP, FAPhA Key Takeaway Tools and techniques pharmacists can use to foster trust with patients regarding vaccines. CDC's "Vaccinate with Confidence" Initiative Protect Communities CDC is supporting partners to find and protect communities at risk through new investments and partnerships. Leverage CDC's Immunization and Vaccines for Children cooperative agreement to support efforts to identify and respond to areas with low vaccine coverage. Public trust in pharmacists and pharmacy teams helps reinforce vaccine messages. Collaboration with community leaders and influencers is crucial—messages must be evidence-based and credible. Best Practices for Pharmacists "Walk the talk"—if you or a family member received concomitant vaccines, share your experience. Example: "I received three vaccines at one visit (flu, COVID, and RSV), and I am here to talk about it (and I do)." Engage with patients by listening rather than lecturing. Acknowledge patient concerns and provide them with information to consider. Vaccine hesitancy is not the same as being anti-vaccine—many patients are "vaccine contemplators." Vaccine Effectiveness COVID-19 Vaccines Effectiveness Against Severe Outcomes Updated vaccines (September 2023 – January 2024) have been effective against XBB lineage and the new JN.1 variant. Waning Protection Booster doses are recommended as vaccine effectiveness declines over time. Population Variability Effectiveness varies based on age, underlying health conditions, and other factors (e.g., immunocompromised individuals may experience different levels of protection). General Vaccine Effectiveness Real-World Conditions Effectiveness is measured under real-world conditions, factoring in vaccine type, dosage, and timing. Monitoring & Updates The CDC continuously tracks vaccine effectiveness to adjust recommendations as needed. Impact of Vaccination Measles: Cases reduced from hundreds of thousands annually to only 49 in 2021. Polio: The U.S. has been polio-free since 1979. Hepatitis B: Routine vaccination significantly reduces liver cancer risk. Childhood Vaccinations: 100% reduction in cases of diphtheria, Hib, measles, mumps, polio, and rubella. Influenza incidence reduced by 17%. Overall Impact: Childhood immunizations have averted over 24 million cases of vaccine-preventable diseases in the U.S. Between 1994-2013, vaccinations prevented: 322 million cases of disease 21 million hospitalizations 732,000 deaths Public Health Strategies Use immunization data to identify areas of low vaccine coverage. Engage with local health departments to monitor vaccine-preventable disease trends. Strengthen immunization programs to enhance outbreak response. Encourage collaboration among healthcare providers—it shouldn't matter who vaccinates, the goal is increasing immunization rates. Empowering Families CDC is partnering with key organizations to strengthen vaccine conversations between providers and parents. Strategies Start vaccine conversations early, targeting parents of infants and pregnant women. Reduce hesitancy and improve access in community health centers. Develop provider toolkits to address parental concerns during outbreaks. Combating Misinformation CDC is working with local messengers and partners to stop vaccine myths. Challenges & Key Messages New administration statements have increased vaccine doubts, making conversations harder. There is no link between vaccines and autism, diabetes, or other diseases. Investments in Public Trust: Work with social media companies to promote trustworthy vaccine information. Provide accessible, accurate vaccine data to policymakers. Engage state and local health officials to counter misinformation effectively. Priorities for 2020 and Beyond CDC aims to ensure that every community is protected through: Data-driven strategies to identify vulnerable populations. Expanding local resources to strengthen vaccination efforts. Building a culture of immunization in healthcare settings. Improving public communication on vaccines. Enhancing partnerships to promote immunization initiatives. Ten Key Messages for Pharmacists Engaging with Vaccine-Hesitant Individuals Vaccines Save Lives – They prevent serious diseases and save millions of lives each year. Rigorous Testing – Vaccines undergo extensive trials and continuous monitoring to ensure safety and effectiveness. Community Immunity – Vaccination protects those who cannot be vaccinated, such as infants and immunocompromised individuals. Combating Misinformation – Rely on credible sources for vaccine facts. Misinformation fuels fear and hesitation. Mild Side Effects – Most side effects (e.g., sore arm, mild fever) are temporary. Severe side effects are extremely rare. Consult Healthcare Providers – Encourage patients to ask healthcare professionals for reassurance. Vaccines and Fertility – There is no evidence that vaccines, including COVID-19 vaccines, affect fertility. Herd Immunity – High vaccination rates protect entire communities. Rapid Vaccine Development Explained – COVID-19 vaccines were developed quickly due to unprecedented funding and collaboration—without compromising safety. Long-Term Benefits – Vaccination prevents future outbreaks and contributes to long-term public health. Pharmacists' Role in Addressing Hesitancy Provide accurate, evidence-based information. Listen actively to patients' concerns. Engage with community health workers to strengthen local vaccination efforts.

How should Christians think biblically about the hot-button issue of vaccines? In this episode, Elizabeth Urbanowicz walks us through biblical principles that help us approach this complex topic. She explains how disease, human responsibility, and sin fit into the discussion, while also offering guidance on interacting with those who hold different opinions. If you've ever felt conflicted about vaccines, big pharma, and government involvement, this episode will provide a helpful framework grounded in Scripture.

With apparently fewer parents choosing to have their children vaccinated, in this episode, host Tola-Doll Fisher and guests are considering how Christians should approach this decision. What's it like to be called an anti-vaxxer and is getting a vaccine loving your neighbour? Laura Brett is a former midwife and author of the book, Losing Liberty Finding Freedom. Laura says she has been called an 'anti vaxxer' and 'conspiracy theorist' for her position on vaccinations. Laura is also an Evangelism Consultant for The Filling Station Trust in Harrogate. Dr Oluseye Arikawe is a practising GP and advocates for routine vaccines for the collective health of society. You can find her on Instagram at a_word_for_her where she talks about women's health and faith. The Great Sexpectations dilemma this episode is '14 years after getting marrying as a virgin I have never had an orgasm.' GREAT SEXPECTATIONS: Fourteen years after marrying as a virgin, I have never had an orgasm. womanalive.co.uk/opinion/great-sexpectations-fourteen-years-after-marrying-as-a-virgin-i-have-never-had-an-orgasm/18440.article The producer of the Woman Alive podcast is Rachel Huston. Special offer! Podcast listeners get 50% off Woman Alive magazine: womanalive/podcast

“By creating this barrier to rabies between wildlife, pets, and people, it's not just about the well-being of the cats—it's about the well-being of the community.” This episode is sponsored-in-part by Maddie's Fund, The Community Cat Clinic, and the Whisker Tracker App. In this episode of the Community Cats Podcast, host Stacy LeBaron sits down with Dr. Bob Weedon, an expert in veterinary public health and a leading advocate for Trap-Neuter-Vaccinate-Return (TNVR) programs. Dr. Weedon shares insights into how TNVR programs are essential for managing cat populations and offer critical public health benefits. By vaccinating community cats, TNVR efforts create a vital “barrier” against diseases like rabies, protecting pets and humans. Dr. Weedon explains how public health officials can embrace TNVR as a community health strategy, emphasizing the power of collaboration between local governments, public health departments, and animal advocates. The conversation ventures into the science behind rabies immunity, debunking misconceptions about cat-related diseases like toxoplasmosis, and why cat advocates should focus on reducing misinformation. Dr. Weedon also gives a sneak peek into potential breakthroughs in non-surgical sterilization techniques, which could revolutionize community cat management. Whether you're a cat advocate, public health professional, or just interested in animal welfare, this episode sheds light on the multi-layered impact of TNVR programs on communities nationwide. Press Play Now For: The importance of vaccinating community cats to safeguard public health How TNVR programs help reduce rabies risks in local communities Strategies for presenting TNVR programs to town officials and addressing misconceptions Myths about toxoplasmosis and its connection to outdoor cats The potential future of non-surgical sterilization in community cat management Real-world examples of successful public-private partnerships in animal control Resources Mentioned: Cat Wars: The Devastating Consequences of a Cuddly Killer by Peter P. Marra and Chris Santella (2016) Response of Feral Cats to Vaccination at the Time of Neutering by S.M. Fischer et al. (2007) Compendium of Animal Rabies Prevention and Control, 2016. Handbook of Zoonoses: Identification and Prevention by Colville and Berryhill (2007). This handbook provides detailed information on zoonotic diseases, including identification and preventive measures. Alliance for Contraception in Cats and Dogs (ACC&D) United Spay Alliance Follow & Review: We'd love for you to follow us if you haven't yet. Click that purple '+' in the top right corner of your Apple Podcasts app. We'd love it even more if you could drop a review or 5-star rating over on Apple Podcasts. Select “Ratings and Reviews” and “Write a Review” then a quick line with your favorite part of the episode. It only takes a second and it helps spread the word about the podcast.

ICAN lead counsel, Aaron Siri, Esq., guides you through an exploration of the Hepatitis B vaccine, outlining the serious problems with this controversial vaccine given to newborn babies in their first days of life in the US, per the CDC. Hear why ICAN is fighting to have this shot removed from the childhood schedule. Further, ICAN is standing up to hospitals which vaccinate newborns without consent of the parents. You can support his effort at icandecide.org/legalmatch.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree--3620606/support.

Despite deadly new devastating strikes on public shelters in Gaza, UN aid teams confirmed that the second and final round of a mass polio vaccination campaign got off to a successful start on Monday.Just hours into the operation, the UN agency for Palestine refugees, UNRWA, said that thousands of children under 10 in the centre of the enclave had already been given another dose of the novel oral polio vaccine type 2 (nOPV2); the first oral shot was administered last month.The success of the campaign is bittersweet, though, after an UNRWA school in Nuseirat that was due to be used as a vaccination base was hit by a deadly strike on Sunday night that left 22 dead.Elsewhere, a pre-dawn strike at Al Aqsa hospital courtyard in Deir Al Balah set tented shelters ablaze and rescue workers searching for survivors among charred and mangled metal frames, as UNRWA spokesperson Louise Wateridge explains to UN News's Daniel Johnson.

Tom Woods joins me to discuss his latest book on the COVID mania, the education system, questioning the conventional narrative of American History, and much more. Find out more about Tom Woods and buy his books here: https://tomwoods.com Check out The Tom Woods History Courses here: https://www.woodshistory.com GoldCo Get up to 10% instant match in bonus silver at http://www.candacelikesgold.com The Wellness Company Save $30 on your kid's medical emergency kit with promo code CANDACE http://www.TWC.health/candace American Financing Act today! Call 800-795-1210 or visit http://www.AmericanFinancing.net/Owens NMLS 182334, nmlsconsumeraccess.org. APR for rates in the 4s start at APR 5.672% for well qualified borrowers. Call 800-795-1210 for details about credit costs and terms Candace on Apple Podcasts: https://t.co/Pp5VZiLXbq Candace on Spotify: https://t.co/16pMuADXuT Candace on Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/RealCandaceO Subscribe to Club Candace: https://www.clubcandace.com Join The Candace Community on Locals: https://candace.locals.com 00:00 - Start 01:20 - Covid and a Diary of a Psychosis 05:40 - How governments control people through fear 08:40 - The problem with our education system 13:04 - The cult of science 16:47 - Vaccines and controlling information 23:34 - The authority figures of scientism 32:40 - Atheism and how governments fill a spiritual void 36:38 - Those who stood up to the COVID regime 40:51 - What was the end goal of the COVID regime? 45:43 - Questioning conventional American history 55:19 - How to stay informed in the modern world #CandaceShow #Candace #CandaceOwens #News #Politics #Culture #PopCulture

AGREE TO DISAGREE: Rabbit virus. / Easy Street Record Shop flooded./ LeBron and nepotism. // Harvard students use Meta Ray-Bans for facial recognition. // WE HEAR YOU! and WORDS TO LIVE BY

Welcome to The Daily Wrap Up, a concise show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant independent news, as we see it, from the last 24 hours (10/6/24). As always, take the information discussed in the video below and research it for yourself, and come to your own conclusions. Anyone telling you what the truth is, or claiming they have the answer, is likely leading you astray, for one reason or another. Stay Vigilant.  !function(r,u,m,b,l,e){r._Rumble=b,r[b]||(r[b]=function(){(r[b]._=r[b]._||[]).push(arguments);if(r[b]._.length==1){l=u.createElement(m),e=u.getElementsByTagName(m)[0],l.async=1,l.src="https://rumble.com/embedJS/u2q643"+(arguments[1].video?'.'+arguments[1].video:'')+"/?url="+encodeURIComponent(location.href)+"&args="+encodeURIComponent(JSON.stringify([].slice.apply(arguments))),e.parentNode.insertBefore(l,e)}})}(window, document, "script", "Rumble");   Rumble("play", {"video":"v5fh5el","div":"rumble_v5fh5el"}); Video Source Links (In Chronological Order): (38) Brad Nitz on X: "I've been digging through the air quality data from last night. I found chlorine 22 times higher than the action level and oxygen concentration below 19.5%. It hit 14.7% and averaged 18.6%. A change in wind direction will blow smoke back into the heart of metro Atlanta tomorrow. https://t.co/PukwDmDUD0" / X Major Dioxin Risk In Georgia (East Palestine 2.0?) & How Israel/US Feigned Diplomacy To Make War Causes of Infertility: New Study Points to PFAS, or 'Forever Chemicals' (10) The Last American Vagabond on X: "@Kevin_McKernan It's also already verifiably having the opposite of the intended effect. As the tetracycline both in the bait they use (and oddly still seem to) and the pesticides they use to kill them, cause them to not only not die, but grow stronger and more resistant. https://t.co/UGbmwgocvH" / X (10) The Last American Vagabond on X: "Per an "Oxitec confidential information" document released via FOIA, they knew very early that 15% of the mosquitoes actually did not die but got stronger, which they then spread to their offspring (that they are not supposed to be able to have). https://t.co/gprSujDnJk https://t.co/GG0CMDzhMC" / X Obligatory Pesticide Spraying In NYC, GM Mosquitoes & Flying Vaccinators - Are They All Connected? US Gov's Toxic Pesticide Program Seems Deliberate & As US Farms Attacked The US Funds Ukraine Farms Israel Invades West Bank, Curfew In Mass. Due To Suspect Mosquito EEE Risk & The Monkeypox Deception A Deployable Mosquito Tech Can Execute, Incapacitate, or Vaccinate & The Age Of Emergency Governance New Tab (39) TeacherTwitting

A vaccine for bees? You're POLLEN my leg.

Send us a textDon't wait, vaccinate: evaluation of routine vaccination administration and reactogenicity in preterm infants.Abdelmessih E, Desai PV, Tracy J, Papadopoulos J, Bashqoy F.J Perinatol. 2024 Sep 10. doi: 10.1038/s41372-024-02111-1. Online ahead of print.PMID: 39256613As always, feel free to send us questions, comments, or suggestions to our email: nicupodcast@gmail.com. You can also contact the show through Instagram or Twitter, @nicupodcast. Or contact Ben and Daphna directly via their Twitter profiles: @drnicu and @doctordaphnamd. The papers discussed in today's episode are listed and timestamped on the webpage linked below. Enjoy!

Episode 176: Self-sampling for HPV screeningFuture Dr. Markarian explains the importance of HPV screening for the prevention of cervical cancer. Dr. Arreaza adds some insight about cervical cancer.Written by Chantal Markarian, MSIV, American University of the Caribbean. Editing and comments by Hector Arreaza, MD.You are listening to Rio Bravo qWeek Podcast, your weekly dose of knowledge brought to you by the Rio Bravo Family Medicine Residency Program from Bakersfield, California, a UCLA-affiliated program sponsored by Clinica Sierra Vista, Let Us Be Your Healthcare Home. This podcast was created for educational purposes only. Visit your primary care provider for additional medical advice.Insights into Cervical Cancer.Chantal: Cervical cancer stands as the most prevalent form of cancer in women globally costing the lives of approximately 350,000 women annually. About 4,000 women die of cervical cancer a year in the US. Cervical cancer is initially asymptomatic, allowing it to advance to a more severe stage if not detected early. The positive news is that cervical cancer is highly preventable through screening for precancerous lesions or the presence of HPV —the primary culprit behind most cases.The role of HPV: Human Papilloma Virus, according to the World Health Organization, caused an estimated 620,000 cancer cases in women and 70,000 cancer cases in men.Cervical cancer is more prevalent in certain regions. In regions with established screening initiatives, the incidence rate and mortality rate of cancer are lower than in resource-limited areas. This highlights that resource-constrained countries continue to bear a burden of this disease. In nations like the United States, access to the HPV vaccine along with routine screenings, like Pap smears and HPV tests has significantly decreased the prevalence of cervical cancer.Screening recommendations from the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) and the American Cancer Society (ACS).The U.S Preventive Services Task Force advises that women aged 21 to 29 undergo a Pap test every three years while those aged 30 to 65 should opt for co-testing (Pap and HPV tests) every five years. These examinations are usually conducted in outpatient facilities, where a medical professional collects a sample of cervical cells that are later examined under a microscope.A normal result states that the sample was adequate for evaluation, in other words, that endocervical/transformation zone components are present, and that the patient is “Negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy.” ACS recommends cervical cancer screening begin at age 25 for women and people with a cervix. Those aged 25 to 65 should have a primary HPV test every 5 years. (A primary HPV test means the HPV test is done without cytology; follow-up screening can be done with a Papanicolaou (Pap) test if needed.) If primary HPV testing is not available, screening may be done with either a co-test every 5 years, which combines an HPV test with a Papanicolaou (Pap) test, or a Pap test alone every 3 years. How is Cervical Cancer Classified?Two systems categorize lesions: the Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia (CIN) scale and the Bethesda system.The CIN scale categorizes lesions based on the degree of involvement of the cervical lining ranging from mild (CIN I) to moderate (CIN II) to severe dysplasia (CIN III).The Bethesda system emphasizes cytological findings organizing results into categories such as atypical squamous cells, low-grade lesions (LSIL), and high-grade lesions (HSIL).ASCUS (Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance) is the most common abnormality seen in pap smears. It may or may not indicate a problem, you have to make a decision based on the patient. Cervical cancer is largely linked to high-risk HPV (hrHPV), mostly HPV 16 and 18, and scientists are investigating tests that identify hrHPV DNA or RNA. These tests may provide a more accurate evaluation of cancer risk compared to traditional cytology. Examples include DNA amplification tests like Cobas test and the Xpert HPV test.Obstacles to Screening.Despite the efficacy of cervical cancer screening, many women face many obstacles to testing. In regions with limited resources, fear, embarrassment, lack of awareness, and restricted healthcare access pose challenges to screening.In Nigeria, a study revealed that women often avoid Pap smears due to a lack of awareness. Similarly, healthcare providers in Ecuador highlighted issues like the absence of screening programs and inadequate health promotion efforts. Women in Peru face obstacles such as long waiting times preferences for female healthcare providers and limited access to health facilities. In 2022, 31% of minority women in the US did not undergo Pap smears in the past three years; many of these women were uninsured, unemployed, or low-income. These challenges contribute to higher rates of cervical cancer among women who do not follow recommended screening guidelines.We must mention the cultural obstacle as well. Some cultures do not allow any kind of pelvic exams before marriage. They put a major emphasis on being a “virgin,” and placing a speculum in the vagina may be considered culturally unacceptable. In those cases, the doctor has to use their best persuasion skills to accomplish the goals of care. For example, they may suggest having the mother in the room during the pap smear, using the smallest speculum possible, or other techniques.Self-sampling.In 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) introduced a global initiative to combat cervical cancer worldwide. The initiative aims to:Vaccinate 90% of girls by age 15.Screen 70% of women by age 35.Treat 90% of women with lesions and invasive cancer by 2030.To achieve these goals, self-sampling for HPV testing has been introduced as a viable option for cervical cancer screening. Self-sampling for HPV testing is seen as an alternative for cervical cancer screening that addresses barriers associated with traditional methods. This approach enables women to take samples themselves using swabs or brushes removing the necessity for a pelvic examination. The option to mail in samples and receive results within two weeks enhances the convenience, privacy, and accessibility of the process giving individuals control over their health.While self-sampling for hrHPV detection is not currently standard practice in the United States, it has been successfully implemented in countries across Europe, Africa, and South America. Pilot studies are ongoing in nations like Canada and New Zealand to assess its effectiveness offering promise for its impact.In May 2024, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved primary HPV self-collection for cervical cancer screening in a health-care setting. That means, the patient still has to go to a clinic to self-collect her sample. How Effective is HPV Self-Sampling?Research supports the accuracy of HPV self-sampling. A study conducted by Polman et al., which involved a randomized controlled trial, demonstrated that HPV tests on self-collected samples were just as precise as those done on samples collected by clinicians in detecting high-grade lesions (CIN II and CIN III). Similarly, a meta-analysis conducted by Arbyn et al. showed no difference in sensitivity or specificity between self-sampled and clinician-sampled tests for detecting CIN grade II or higher.These results indicate that self-sampling could be an adequate screening method for cervical cancer. This reassurance may motivate women to partake in screenings knowing they have a convenient and effective option. Ok, let's say a patient has collected her sample or the sample was collected by a clinician, what is next?Management of Cervical Cancer Screening Results.The process of managing cervical cancer screening results involves evaluating a patient's immediate and five-year risk of developing cervical abnormalities (CIN 3+) following guidelines from the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology (ASCCP).The ASCCP app is the best investment you can make in primary care. It is only $9.99, but it can save you a lot of time in clinic. Estimating risk is a process that considers factors such as current HPV test results, past screening outcomes, the patients' age, and whether they've had a hysterectomy or not. When Risk is Elevated, Prompt Action.If a patient's immediate risk of developing CIN 3 exceeds 4%, expedited treatment is typically recommended. This treatment may entail one of several procedures aimed at removing abnormal cervical tissue.Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure (LEEP): A common method that removes tissue using an electric wire loop. Cold Knife Conization: In this procedure, a scalpel removes a cone-shaped section of the cervix.Laser Cone Biopsy: This technique involves removing a cone-shaped section of tissue using a laser.Alternatively, healthcare providers may opt for treatment methods such, as cryotherapy, thermos-ablation, and laser ablation to eliminate abnormal tissue.And those procedures are typically out of the scope of family medicine, but many family doctors may perform them with the proper training and experience.When the risk is deemed low, Surveillance.Patients with a risk of CIN 3 below 4% are typically advised to undergo surveillance with HPV testing every 1-5 years. If HPV testing is not available cytology alone (Pap test) is considered acceptable.Special considerations for women.For women under 25, a cautious approach is taken. If a low-grade lesion (LSIL) is identified through cytology, it is recommended to repeat the test annually for two years. If two consecutive tests show normal results the patient can resume screening intervals based on age. However, if a high-grade lesion (HSIL) is detected, a colposcopy and biopsy are recommended. It should be noted that expedited treatment is generally not advised for this age group since many high-grade lesions may resolve spontaneously.For women over 25, the presence of low-grade lesions or persistent high-risk HPV often leads to recommendations for colposcopy and cervical biopsy.When a cervical biopsy shows adenocarcinoma in situ it is suggested to perform an excisional procedure to rule out invasive cancer. The next steps depend on the margins of the excised tissue; If the margins show positive results (indicating abnormal tissue remains) further excision is necessary to ensure clear margins. This may be followed by a hysterectomy due to the risk of residual disease. For individuals who have been treated for high-grade lesions there is still a risk of developing cervical cancer. Therefore, long-term surveillance is essential. Women over 25 should undergo HPV testing six months after treatment, then annually until three consecutive negative tests are obtained. Subsequently testing every three years is advised for 25 years. As for women under 25, cervical cytology should be done six months post-treatment. Then at six-month intervals until three consecutive negative results are achieved. Once they reach 25 years old, they should switch to HPV testing.As summary, HPV is the most common cause of cervical cancer, and screening must be implemented no matter what your zip code is because adequate screening can lead to a lower mortality. Remember that self-collection is an alternative for your patients, and it is FDA-approved if it is done in a healthcare setting. The ASCCP guidelines are very useful but difficult to memorize, so you can invest in the ASCCP phone app to provide accurate care for your patients. Thanks!References: 1. World Health Organization. HPV and Cervical Cancer Fact Sheet. 2024. Available online: https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/human-papillomavirus-(hpv)-and-cervical-cancer (accessed on 10 August 2024).2. Arbyn M, Weiderpass E, Bruni L, et al. Estimates of incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in 2018: a worldwide analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2020;8(2):e191-e203.3. Serrano B, Ibáñez R, Robles C, Peremiquel-Trillas P, de Sanjosé S, Bruni L. Worldwide use of HPV self-sampling for cervical cancer screening. Preventive Medicine. 2022;154:106900.4. Gupta S, Palmer C, Bik EM, et al. Self-sampling for human papillomavirus testing: increased cervical cancer screening participation and incorporation in international screening programs. Front Public Health. 2018;6:345033.5. Ubah C, Nwaneri AC, Anarado AN, Iheanacho PN, Odikpo LC. Perceived barriers to cervical cancer screening uptake among women of an urban community in South-eastern Nigeria. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2022;23(6):1959-1965.6. Vega Crespo, B., Neira, V.A., Ortíz Segarra, J. et al.Barriers and facilitators to cervical cancer screening among under-screened women in Cuenca, Ecuador: the perspectives of women and health professionals. BMC Public Health 22, 2144 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14601-y7.Olaza-Maguiña AF, De la Cruz-Ramirez YM. Barriers to the non-acceptance of cervical cancer screenings (Pap smear test) in women of childbearing age in a rural area of Peru. Ecancermedicalscience. 2019;13:901.8. Sharma M, Batra K, Johansen C, Raich S. Explaining correlates of cervical cancer screening among minority women in the United States. Pharmacy. 2022 Feb 15;10(1):30.9. Polman NJ, Ebisch RMF, Heideman DAM, et al. Performance of human papillomavirus testing on self-collected versus clinician-collected samples for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of grade 2 or worse: a randomised, paired screen-positive, non-inferiority trial. The Lancet Oncology. 2019;20(2):229-238.10. Costa S, Verberckmoes B, Castle PE, Arbyn M. Offering HPV self-sampling kits: an updated meta-analysis of the effectiveness of strategies to increase participation in cervical cancer screening. British Journal of Cancer. 2023 Mar 23;128(5):805-13.11. Perkins RB, Guido RS, Castle PE, et al. 2019 ASCCP risk-based management consensus guidelines for abnormal cervical cancer screening tests and cancer precursors. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2020;24(2):102-131.12. Straughn, Jr, J Michael, and Catheryn Yashar. “Management of Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.” Www.uptodate.com, 2 Aug. 2024, https://www.uptodate.com/contents/management-of-early-stage-cervical-cancer. Accessed 13 Aug. 2024.13. AMBOSS GmbH.Cervical cancer screening. https://amboss.com/. Accessed August 18, 2024.14. Royalty-free music used for this episode: Lofi-Chilly by Gushito, downloaded on Nov 06, 2023, from https://www.videvo.net

There's a lot of fear out there concerning vaccines. Should we vaccinate our kids or not? Can you delay vaccines in infants? What are the disease risks if you decide not to get vaccinated? Which things should you vaccinate against? Is there a tie between autism and vaccines? Listen in as Shug sits down with Dr. Bob Sears, practicing pediatrician and author, to discuss the pros, cons, risks and side effects of vaccinations and the concern around losing our medical freedom. To learn more about our show, go to him4her.org. To watch our shows, go to our Women's Hot Topics with Shug Bury YouTube channel.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

AP correspondent Laurence Brooks reports on U.N.'s campaign to vaccinate Palestinian children in Gaza against polio began early, as fighting continues.

Dr Margaret Harris, Spokesperson for the World Health Organization, on the agreement to introduce humanitarian pauses in Gaza to allow for the vaccination of children against polio.

Nurses Out Loud with Melissa Schreibfeder, BSN, RN – Parents across the country are expressing concerns over the growing pressure to vaccinate their children to attend school. They cite issues such as the lack of placebo safety testing, the absence of liability from vaccine manufacturers, and the sheer volume of vaccines — over 72 doses — from ages 0 to 18. Many parents feel coerced into compliance despite their reservations...

Nurses Out Loud with Melissa Schreibfeder, BSN, RN – Parents across the country are expressing concerns over the growing pressure to vaccinate their children to attend school. They cite issues such as the lack of placebo safety testing, the absence of liability from vaccine manufacturers, and the sheer volume of vaccines — over 72 doses — from ages 0 to 18. Many parents feel coerced into compliance despite their reservations...

GET FREEZE DRIED BEEF HERE: https://wambeef.com/ Use Code WAMBEEF to save 25%! 10+ Year Shelf life & All Natural! GET HEIRLOOM SEEDS & NON GMO SURVIVAL FOOD HERE: https://heavensharvest.com/ USE Code WAM to save 5%! BUY GOLD HERE: https://firstnationalbullion.com/schedule-consult/ GET YOUR APRICOT SEEDS at the life-saving Richardson Nutritional Center HERE: https://rncstore.com/r?id=bg8qc1 Josh Sigurdson reports on the new rules being pushed forward by New Zealand as the US Department Of Homeland Security sends Dr. Peter Hotez around the world to demand NATO force vaccinate the population and essentially imprison those who refuse. The revised Civil Defense Emergency Management Act of 2002 in New Zealand has a 3 tiered system that involves the power to "detain, isolate or quarantine" people, animals, buildings, businesses, etc. If people do not accept pharmaceutical drugs or vaccines in a so-called "pandemic," they will face these consequences. The rule also allows the police to do "anything reasonably necessary including the use of force." They're prepping the world for total lockdown. While most are aware the previous lockdowns were nonsensical, people are still generally compliant and most still believe despite everything they've seen that covid was a real thing. As governments worldwide including in the United States claim that "covid is back" and force vaccinate cattle and chickens with mRNA under the guise of stopping "bird flu," we are now seeing a "Global Health Emergency Order" by the World Health Organization regarding "Monkeypox" or as the woke call it, "Mpox." They're already releasing mRNA injections for Monkeypox and are seeking approval in the European Union for Monkeypox vaccines for ages 12 to 17. This is an all-out war on humanity itself. Its goal? Total technocratic enslavement and the sacrifice of humanity. As former YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki dies of turbo cancer caused by covid injections which she censored others for warning about including us, countless new studies are coming out proving the connection between the injections and cancer, heart attacks and self assembling nano-particles. The "conspiracy theorists" were right. But that doesn't seem to stop the psychopaths that pretend to reign with an iron fist. The goal of all of this is to demoralize while creating false hero worship. To weaken and then offer bad solutions. From a CBDC with a digital ID attached to a social credit and carbon credit score determining food and energy rations to 15 Minute Cities. From WW3 and civil wars across the board to climate hysteria and new "pandemics." The script was written long ago. Do NOT fall for it. Stay tuned for more from WAM! ORDER QUALITY MEAT TO YOUR DOOR HERE: https://wildpastures.com/promos/save-20-for-life/bonus15?oid=6&affid=321 Save 20% and get $15 off your FIRST order! Support your local farms and stay healthy! HELP SUPPORT US AS WE DOCUMENT HISTORY HERE: https://gogetfunding.com/help-wam-cover-history/ PayPal: ancientwonderstelevision@gmail.com FIND OUR CoinTree page here: https://cointr.ee/joshsigurdson JOIN US on SubscribeStar here: https://www.subscribestar.com/world-alternative-media For subscriber only content! Follow us on Twitter here: https://twitter.com/WorldAltMedia Pledge here! Just a dollar a month can help us alive! https://www.patreon.com/user?u=2652072&ty=h&u=2652072 BITCOIN ADDRESS: 18d1WEnYYhBRgZVbeyLr6UfiJhrQygcgNU World Alternative Media 2024

In parts of the U.S., summer brings reports of anthrax in cattle. It hits…

(Re-Release) Ever have to speak loudly in public to clarify something your child said to people who may have overheard… we all have, right? Mel gives us the rundown on what we need to do about head lice. And Miranda takes a departure from her usual to talk about the fascinating topic of feral children. Spotlight - Feral Cat Helpershttps://www.feralcathelpers.com/ ​We are a non-profit cat rescue organization located in Mount Pleasant, SC. Founded in August 2015. Our program TVAAR (Trap, Vaccinate, Alter and Return/re-home) is set up for the feral and stray cats in our community enabling them to be Charleston County protected Free Roaming Cats.Sources - Mel - https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Head_louse https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/head-lice/symptoms-causes/syc-20356180 https://www.consumerreports.org/children-s-health/myths-and-facts-about-head-lice/ Miranda - https://www.goodtherapy.org/blog/psychpedia/feral-children https://www.urbo.com/content/modern-cases-of-feral-children-raised-in-the-wild/ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Send us a Text Message.Jeanette covers the importance of a puppy curriculum, how long and how often it should be done, why it may be wise to have a veterinarian vaccinate your puppies, and the considerations involved when a puppy is returned.Jeanette ForreyWebinars (classes and training) Badass Breeder Badass Breeder on Facebook Badass Breeder on Instagram Empowered Breeder Software The Ultimate Badass Breeder's GuideRaising the Empowered Puppy Guide for ClientsYouTube Playlist Jeanette Forrey Email

This month, the Department of Justice shut down nearly 1,000 pro-Russia social media bots masquerading as American citizens. Their goal was to promote stories that showed Russia and President Vladimir Putin in a favorable light while sowing discord here in the U.S. With the proliferation of fake news on social media, is it possible to vaccinate ourselves against untruths and lies? What is the psychology behind persuasion and influence that makes people fall prey to fake news? Sander van der Linden, professor of social psychology at the University of Cambridge, joins The Excerpt to discuss what it takes to resist persuasion on social media.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Based on the most current research, Dr. Roger discusses what diseases pet owners should be vaccinating their dogs and cats against and with what frequency. Dr. Roger Welton is a practicing veterinarian and media personality, CEO/attending veterinarian at ⁠⁠⁠Premier Veterinary Care⁠⁠⁠, and author of the top selling book, ⁠⁠⁠The Man In The White Coat⁠⁠⁠.  Dr. Roger selects listener emails to be addressed on the air, so if interested in having your voice heard on the podcast, email comments or questions to comments@web-dvm.net.  For more content from Dr. Roger visit his blog at ⁠⁠⁠Web-DVM.net⁠⁠⁠ and you can also follow his public Facebook profile by friend requesting "Roger Welton DVM".

Welcome to The Daily Wrap Up, a concise show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant independent news, as we see it, from the last 24 hours (6/28/24). As always, take the information discussed in the video below and research it for yourself, and come to your own conclusions. Anyone telling you what the truth is, or claiming they have the answer, is likely leading you astray, for one reason or another. Stay Vigilant. !function(r,u,m,b,l,e){r._Rumble=b,r[b]||(r[b]=function(){(r[b]._=r[b]._||[]).push(arguments);if(r[b]._.length==1){l=u.createElement(m),e=u.getElementsByTagName(m)[0],l.async=1,l.src="https://rumble.com/embedJS/u2q643"+(arguments[1].video?'.'+arguments[1].video:'')+"/?url="+encodeURIComponent(location.href)+"&args="+encodeURIComponent(JSON.stringify([].slice.apply(arguments))),e.parentNode.insertBefore(l,e)}})}(window, document, "script", "Rumble");   Rumble("play", {"video":"v520ix8","div":"rumble_v520ix8"}); Video Source Links (In Chronological Order): (47) Chris Hedges on X: "You Saved Julian Assange: Julian Assange was not released because the courts defended the rule of law and exonerated a man who had not committed a crime. He was not released because the Biden White House and the intelligence community have a conscience. He was not released…" / X New Tab (43) tinfoilhatgirl82 on X: "is anyone surprised? @TLAVagabond told us this from the beginning" / X (21) Ahjhi (aka: BILL COIN: BILLY to friends) on X: "@emgfind @TLAVagabond Ohio train crash toxic chems to Canada, yall go charge duty like when i order online

Uh-oh, things are getting really wild this week as the Gal Pals dig in and talk about pets!! Mel spins a yarn about her cat's urinary problems, which ends up with her crawling around doggy-style like a bloodhound following her trusty nose to find a pee-spot. Next, Miranda teaches us about the benefits and considerations of pet ownership... all those furry cuddles come at a cost, you know! Lastly, Mel discusses the confusing parasitic infection of toxoplasmosis. Spoiler alert, there's a good chance you have this infection and don't even know it! Throw the dog a bone and join us for this fun and informative episode! Spotlight: Feral Cat HelpersMt. Pleasant, SCA Non-Profit 501(C)(3) Organizationhttps://www.feralcathelpers.com / ​We are a non-profit cat rescue organization located in Mount Pleasant , SC. Founded in August 2015. Our program TVAAR (Trap, Vaccinate, Alter and Return/re-home) is set up for the feral and stray cats in our community enabling them to be Charleston County protected Free Roaming Cats.Sources:Mel-https://www.livescience.com/surprising-toxoplasma-gondii-facts https://www.cdc.gov/parasites/toxoplasmosis/index.htmlhttps://www.avma.org/resources/pet-owners/petcare/toxoplasmosisMiranda-https://mottpoll.org/reports/family-pets-pros-and-cons-kidshttps://www.verywellfamily.com/how-kids-benefit-from-pet-ownership-5201854https://newsinhealth.nih.gov/2018/02/power-pets Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Do we need to ready ourselves for the Bird Flu Virus? Could this create a food shortage? The impending WHO pandemic reforms to be voted on by WHO Member States at the 77th World Health Assembly (WHA) On COVID: Not just the COVID vaccine that does damage BUT, the very virus itself can. Hear why this could be an issue. Preventative procedures are discussed along with cocktail to fend off long covid offered. Vast majority of academic physicians who produce the medical manuscripts start from a pro-vaccine position, therefore there is publication bias. --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/rose-unplugged/support

Who fact checks the fact checkers? Attorney Tom Renz refutes a recent AP “fact check” and alleges that the real “disinformation” is calling COVID mRNA shots “vaccines” instead of “gene therapy” – and says the FDA itself admits this in documents from 2020. Sasha Latypova – a former pharmaceutical executive – returns to discuss why Dr. Drew continues to vaccinate elderly patients despite warning against mRNA use for younger people, resisting vaccine mandates, and fighting against lockdowns. Tom Renz is an attorney from Ohio conducting ‘Lawfare for Freedom' by fighting corruption surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic at state and federal levels. Find out more at https://renz-law.com and follow him at https://x.com/RenzTom Sasha Latypova is a former pharmaceutical R&D executive with over 25 years of experience in clinical trials, clinical technologies, and regulatory approvals. She owned and managed several contract research organizations and worked for more than 60 pharma companies worldwide. She interacted with the FDA as part of a scientific industry consortium on improving cardiac safety assessments in clinical trials. Follow her at https://x.com/sasha_latypova and read more at https://sashalatypova.substack.com 「 SUPPORT OUR SPONSORS 」 Find out more about the brands that make this show possible and get special discounts on Dr. Drew's favorite products at https://drdrew.com/sponsors  • PALEOVALLEY - "Paleovalley has a wide variety of extraordinary products that are both healthful and delicious,” says Dr. Drew. "I am a huge fan of this brand and know you'll love it too!” Get 15% off your first order at https://drdrew.com/paleovalley • COZY EARTH - Susan and Drew love Cozy Earth's sheets & clothing made with super-soft viscose from bamboo! Use code DREW to save up to 40% at https://drdrew.com/cozy • TRU NIAGEN - For almost a decade, Dr. Drew has been taking a healthy-aging supplement called Tru Niagen, which uses a patented form of Nicotinamide Riboside to boost NAD levels. Use code DREW for 20% off at https://drdrew.com/truniagen • GENUCEL - Using a proprietary base formulated by a pharmacist, Genucel has created skincare that can dramatically improve the appearance of facial redness and under-eye puffiness. Get an extra discount with promo code DREW at https://genucel.com/drew • THE WELLNESS COMPANY - Counteract harmful spike proteins with TWC's Signature Series Spike Support Formula containing nattokinase and selenium. Learn more about TWC's supplements at https://twc.health/drew 「 GEAR 」 • NANLITE - Dr. Drew upgraded his studio with Nanlite: the best lighting for film, TV, and live streaming podcasts. Bring your vision to life at https://drdrew.com/nanlite 「 MEDICAL NOTE 」 Portions of this program may examine countervailing views on important medical issues. Always consult your personal physician before making any decisions about your health. 「 ABOUT THE SHOW 」 Ask Dr. Drew is produced by Kaleb Nation (https://kalebnation.com) and Susan Pinsky (https://twitter.com/firstladyoflove). This show is for entertainment and/or informational purposes only, and is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. 「 ABOUT DR. DREW 」 Dr. Drew is a board-certified physician with over 35 years of national radio, NYT bestselling books, and countless TV shows bearing his name. He's known for Celebrity Rehab (VH1), Teen Mom OG (MTV), The Masked Singer (FOX), multiple hit podcasts, and the iconic Loveline radio show. Dr. Drew Pinsky received his undergraduate degree from Amherst College and his M.D. from the University of Southern California, School of Medicine. Read more at https://drdrew.com/about Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices