Podcasts about Electrolux

A série Talks Estadão Mídia & Mkt traz as trajetórias, desafios e inovações na voz das lideranças da comunicação e do marketing. A primeira temporada é dedicada a mulheres de impacto – profissionais que estão transformando o mercado e redefinindo o futuro dessa indústria. No segundo episódio, Rita Lisauskas e Igor Ribeiro entrevistam Ana Peretti, VP de marketing e sustentabilidade da Electrolux Latam.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this preview episode, Mark Graban talks with Sandro Casagrande of Electrolux about the upcoming KaiNexus webinar: “Unlock the Power of Leadership: The Electrolux Manufacturing System (EMS) Way.”Register for the full webinar (Dec 10, 1 pm ET):https://info.kainexus.com/unlock-the-power-of-leadership-the-electrolux-management-system-ems-way/webinarSandro shares insights from more than 30 years at Electrolux, including:• How continuous improvement started with Total Quality Management in Italy• The evolution of EMS from early pilots to a global system• Why strong leadership behavior—not just tools and training—determines sustainability• Lessons learned from uneven progress across sites• How EMS Way reframed the company's strategy to focus on culture, people development, and leader capabilityIf you're interested in Lean, leadership, cultural transformation, or sustaining improvement across a global enterprise, this discussion sets the stage for a powerful webinar.Learn more about KaiNexus webinars: https://www.kainexus.com/webinars

I am Rolf Claessen and together with my co-host Ken Suzan I am welcoming you to episode 169 of our podcast IP Fridays! Today's interview guest is Prof. Aloys Hüttermann, co-founder of my patent law firm Michalski Hüttermann & Partner and a true expert on the Unified Patent Court. He has written several books about the new system and we talk about all the things that plaintiffs and defendants can learn from the first decisions of the court and what they mean for strategic decisions of the parties involved. But before we jump into this very interesting interview, I have news for you! The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is planning rule changes that would make it virtually impossible for third parties to challenge invalid patents before the patent office. Criticism has come from the EFF and other inventor rights advocates: the new rules would play into the hands of so-called non-practicing entities (NPEs), as those attacked would have few cost-effective ways to have questionable patents deleted. The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) reports a new record in international patent applications: in 2024, around 3.7 million patent applications were filed worldwide – an increase of 4.9% over the previous year. The main drivers were Asian countries (China alone accounted for 1.8 million), while demand for trademark protection has stabilized after the pandemic decline. US rapper Eminem is taking legal action in Australia against a company that sells swimwear under the name “Swim Shady.” He believes this infringes on his famous “Slim Shady” brand. The case illustrates that even humorous allusions to well-known brand names can lead to legal conflicts. A new ruling by the Unified Patent Court (UPC) demonstrates its cross-border impact. In “Fujifilm v. Kodak,” the local chamber in Mannheim issued an injunction that extends to the UK despite Brexit. The UPC confirmed its jurisdiction over the UK parts of a European patent, as the defendant Kodak is based in a UPC member state. A dispute over standard patents is looming at the EU level: the Legal Affairs Committee (JURI) of the European Parliament voted to take the European Commission to the European Court of Justice. The reason for this is the Commission’s controversial withdrawal of a draft regulation on the licensing of standard-essential patents (SEPs). Parliament President Roberta Metsola is to decide by mid-November whether to file the lawsuit. In trademark law, USPTO Director Squires reported on October 31, 2025, that a new unit (“Trademark Registration Protection Office”) had removed approximately 61,000 invalid trademark applications from the registries. This cleanup of the backlog relieved the examining authority and accelerated the processing of legitimate applications. Now let's jump into the interview with Aloys Hüttermann: The Unified Patent Court Comes of Age – Insights from Prof. Aloys Hüttermann The Unified Patent Court (UPC) has moved from a long-discussed project to a living, breathing court system that already shapes patent enforcement in Europe. In a recent IP Fridays interview, Prof. Aloys Hüttermann – founder and equity partner at Michalski · Hüttermann & Partner and one of the earliest commentators on the UPC – shared his experiences from the first years of practice, as well as his view on how the UPC fits into the global patent litigation landscape. This article summarises the key points of that conversation and is meant as an accessible overview for in-house counsel, patent attorneys and business leaders who want to understand what the UPC means for their strategy. How Prof. Hüttermann Became “Mr. UPC” Prof. Hüttermann has been closely involved with the UPC for more than a decade. When it became clear, around 13 years ago, that the European project of a unified patent court and a unitary patent was finally going to happen, he recognised that this would fundamentally change patent enforcement in Europe. He started to follow the legislative and political developments in detail and went beyond mere observation. As author and editor of several books and a major commentary on the UPC, he helped shape the discussion around the new system. His first book on the UPC appeared in 2016 – years before the court finally opened its doors in 2023. What fascinated him from the beginning was the unique opportunity to witness the creation of an entirely new court system, to analyse how it would be built and, where possible, to contribute to its understanding and development. It was clear to him that this system would be a “game changer” for European patent enforcement. UPC in the Global Triangle: Europe, the US and China In practice, most international patent disputes revolve around three major regions: the UPC territory in Europe, the United States and China. Each of these regions has its own procedural culture, cost structure and strategic impact. From a territorial perspective, the UPC is particularly attractive because it can, under the right conditions, grant pan-European injunctions that cover a broad range of EU Member States with a single decision. This consolidation of enforcement is something national courts in Europe simply cannot offer. From a cost perspective, the UPC is significantly cheaper than US litigation, especially if one compares the cost of one UPC action with a bundle of separate national cases in large European markets. When viewed against the territorial reach and procedural speed, the “bang for the buck” is very compelling. China is again a different story. The sheer volume of cases there is enormous, with tens of thousands of patent infringement cases per year. Chinese courts are known for their speed; first-instance decisions within about a year are common. In this respect they resemble the UPC more than the US does. The UPC also aims at a roughly 12 to 15 month time frame for first-instance cases where validity is at issue. The US, by contrast, features extensive discovery, occasionally jury trials and often longer timelines. The procedural culture is very different. The UPC, like Chinese courts, operates without discovery in the US sense, which makes proceedings more focused on the written record and expert evidence that the parties present, and less on pre-trial disclosure battles. Whether a company chooses to litigate in the US, the UPC, China, or some combination of these forums will depend on where the key markets and assets are. However, in Prof. Hüttermann's view, once Europe is an important market, it is hard to justify ignoring the UPC. He expects the court's caseload and influence to grow strongly over the coming years. A Landmark UPC Case: Syngenta v. Sumitomo A particularly important case in which Prof. Hüttermann was involved is the Syngenta v. Sumitomo matter, concerning a composition patent. This case has become a landmark in UPC practice for several reasons. First, the Court of Appeal clarified a central point about the reach of UPC injunctions. It made clear that once infringement is established in one Member State, this will usually be sufficient to justify a pan-European injunction covering all UPC countries designated by the patent. That confirmation gave patent owners confidence that the UPC can in fact deliver broad, cross-border relief in one go. Second, the facts of the case raised novel issues about evidence and territorial reach. The allegedly infringing product had been analysed based on a sample from the Czech Republic, which is not part of the UPC system. Later, the same product with the same name was marketed in Bulgaria, which is within UPC territory. The Court of Appeal held that the earlier analysis of the Czech sample could be relied on for enforcement in Bulgaria. This showed that evidence from outside the UPC territory can be sufficient, as long as it is properly linked to the products marketed within the UPC. Third, the Court of Appeal took the opportunity to state its view on inventive step. It confirmed that combining prior-art documents requires a “pointer”, in line with the EPO's problem-solution approach. The mere theoretical possibility of extracting a certain piece of information from a document does not suffice to justify an inventive-step attack. This is one of several decisions where the UPC has shown a strong alignment with EPO case law on substantive patentability. For Prof. Hüttermann personally, the case was also a lesson in oral advocacy before the UPC. During the two appeal hearings, the presiding judge asked unexpected questions that required quick and creative responses while the hearing continued. His practical takeaway is that parties should appear with a small, well-coordinated team: large enough to allow someone to work on a tricky question in the background, but small enough to remain agile. Two or three lawyers seem ideal; beyond that, coordination becomes difficult and “too many cooks spoil the broth”. A Game-Changing CJEU Decision: Bosch Siemens Hausgeräte v. Electrolux Surprisingly, one of the most important developments for European patent litigation in the past year did not come from the UPC at all, but from the Court of Justice of the European Union. In Bosch Siemens Hausgeräte v. Electrolux, the CJEU revisited the rules on cross-border jurisdiction under the Brussels I Recast Regulation (Brussels Ia). Previously, under what practitioners often referred to as the GAT/LuK regime, a court in one EU country was largely prevented from granting relief for alleged infringement in another country if the validity of the foreign patent was contested there. This significantly limited the possibilities for cross-border injunctions. In Bosch, the CJEU changed course. Without going into all procedural details, the essence is that courts in the EU now have broader powers to grant cross-border relief when certain conditions are met, particularly when at least one defendant is domiciled in the forum state. The concept of an “anchor defendant” plays a central role: if you sue one group company in its home forum, other group companies in other countries, including outside the EU, can be drawn into the case. This has already had practical consequences. German courts, for example, have issued pan-European injunctions covering around twenty countries in pharmaceutical cases. There are even attempts to sue European companies for infringement of US patents based on acts in the US, using the logic of Bosch as a starting point. How far courts will ultimately go remains to be seen, but the potential is enormous. For the UPC, this development is highly relevant. The UPC operates in the same jurisdictional environment as national courts, and many defendants in UPC cases will be domiciled in UPC countries. This increases the likelihood that the UPC, too, can leverage the broadened possibilities for cross-border relief. In addition, we have already seen UPC decisions that include non-EU countries such as the UK within the scope of injunctions, in certain constellations. The interaction between UPC practice and the Bosch jurisprudence of the CJEU is only beginning to unfold. Does the UPC Follow EPO Case Law? A key concern for many patent owners and practitioners is whether the UPC will follow the EPO's Boards of Appeal or develop its own, possibly divergent, case law on validity. On procedural matters, the UPC is naturally different from the EPO. It has its own rules of procedure, its own timelines and its own tools, such as “front-loaded” pleadings and tight limits on late-filed material. On substantive law, however, Prof. Hüttermann's conclusion is clear: there is “nothing new under the sun”. The UPC's approach to novelty, inventive step and added matter is very close to that of the EPO. The famous “gold standard” for added matter appears frequently in UPC decisions. Intermediate generalisations are treated with the same suspicion as at the EPO. In at least one case, the UPC revoked a patent for added matter even though the EPO had granted it in exactly that form. The alignment is not accidental. The UPC only deals with European patents granted by the EPO; it does not hear cases on purely national patents. If the UPC were more generous than the EPO, many patents would never reach it. If it were systematically stricter, patentees would be more tempted to opt out of the system. In practice, the UPC tends to apply the EPO's standards and, where anything differs, it is usually a matter of factual appreciation rather than a different legal test. For practitioners, this has a very practical implication: if you want to predict how the UPC will decide on validity, the best starting point is to ask how the EPO would analyse the case. The UPC may not always reach the same result in parallel EPO opposition proceedings, but the conceptual framework is largely the same. Trends in UPC Practice: PIs, Equivalents and Division-Specific Styles Even in its early years, certain trends and differences between UPC divisions can be observed. On preliminary injunctions, the local division in Düsseldorf has taken a particularly proactive role. It has been responsible for most of the ex parte PIs granted so far and applies a rather strict notion of urgency, often considering one month after knowledge of the infringement as still acceptable, but treating longer delays with scepticism. Other divisions tend to see two months as still compatible with urgency, and they are much more cautious with ex parte measures. Munich, by contrast, has indicated a strong preference for inter partes PI proceedings and appears reluctant to grant ex parte relief at all. A judge from Munich has even described the main action as the “fast” procedure and the inter partes PI as the “very fast” one, leaving little room for an even faster ex parte track. There are also differences in how divisions handle amendments and auxiliary requests in PI proceedings. Munich has suggested that if a patentee needs to rely on claim amendments or auxiliary requests in a PI, the request is unlikely to succeed. Other divisions have been more open to considering auxiliary requests. The doctrine of equivalents is another area where practice is not yet harmonised. The Hague division has explicitly applied a test taken from Dutch law in at least one case and found infringement by equivalence. However, the Court of Appeal has not yet endorsed a specific test, and in another recent Hague case the same division did not apply that Dutch-law test again. The Mannheim division has openly called for the development of an autonomous, pan-European equivalence test, but has not yet fixed such a test in a concrete decision. This is clearly an area to watch. Interim conferences are commonly used in most divisions to clarify issues early on, but Düsseldorf often dispenses with them to save time. In practice, interim conferences can be very helpful for narrowing down the issues, though parties should not expect to be able to predict the final decision from what is discussed there. Sometimes topics that dominate the interim conference play little or no role in the main oral hearing. A Front-Loaded System and Typical Strategic Mistakes UPC proceedings are highly front-loaded and very fast. A defendant usually has three months from service of the statement of claim to file a full statement of defence and any counterclaim for revocation. This is manageable, but only if the time is used wisely. One common strategic problem is that parties lose time at the beginning and only develop a clear strategy late in the three-month period. According to Prof. Hüttermann, it is crucial to have a firm strategy within the first two or three weeks and then execute it consistently. Constantly changing direction is a recipe for failure in such a compressed system. Another characteristic is the strict attitude towards late-filed material. It is difficult to introduce new documents or new inventive-step attacks later in the procedure. In some cases even alternative combinations of already-filed prior-art documents have been viewed as “new” attacks and rejected as late. At the appeal stage, the Court of Appeal has even considered new arguments based on different parts of a book already in the file as potentially late-filed. This does not mean that parties should flood the court with dozens of alternative attacks in the initial brief. In one revocation action, a plaintiff filed about fifty different inventive-step attacks, only to be told by the court that this was not acceptable and that the attacks had to be reduced and structured. The UPC is not a body conducting ex officio examination. It is entitled to manage the case actively and to ask parties to focus on the most relevant issues. Evidence Gathering, Protective Letters and the Defendant's Perspective The UPC provides powerful tools for both sides. Evidence inspection is becoming more common, not only at trade fairs but also at company premises. This can be a valuable tool for patentees, but it also poses a serious risk for defendants who may suddenly face court-ordered inspections. From the perspective of potential defendants, protective letters are an important instrument, especially in divisions like Düsseldorf where ex parte PIs are possible. A well-written protective letter, filed in advance, can significantly reduce the risk of a surprise injunction. The court fees are moderate, but the content of the protective letter must be carefully prepared; a poor submission can cause more harm than good. Despite the strong tools available to patentees, Prof. Hüttermann does not view the UPC as unfair to defendants. If a defendant files a solid revocation counterclaim, the pressure shifts to the patentee, who then has only two months to reply, prepare all auxiliary requests and adapt the enforcement strategy. This is even more demanding than at the EPO, because the patentee must not only respond to validity attacks but also ensure that any amended claims still capture the allegedly infringing product. It is entirely possible to secure the survival of a patent with an auxiliary request that no longer covers the defendant's product. In that scenario, the patentee has “won” on validity but lost the infringement case. Managing this tension under tight time limits is a key challenge of UPC practice. The Future Role of the UPC and How to Prepare Today the UPC hears a few hundred cases per year, compared with several thousand patent cases in the US and tens of thousands in China. Nevertheless, both the court itself and experienced practitioners see significant growth potential. Prof. Hüttermann expects case numbers to multiply in the medium term. Whether the UPC will become the first choice forum in global disputes or remain one pillar in parallel proceedings alongside the US and China will depend on the strategies of large patentees and the evolution of case law. However, the court is well equipped: it covers a large, economically important territory, is comparatively cost-effective and offers fast procedures with robust remedies. For companies that may end up before the UPC, preparation is essential. On the offensive side, that means building strong evidence and legal arguments before filing, being ready to proceed quickly and structured, and understanding the specific styles of the relevant divisions. On the defensive side, it may mean filing protective letters in risk-exposed markets, preparing internal processes for rapid reaction if a statement of claim arrives, and taking inspection requests seriously. Conclusion The Unified Patent Court has quickly moved from theory to practice. It offers pan-European relief, fast and front-loaded procedures, and a substantive approach that closely mirrors the EPO's case law. At the same time, national and EU-level developments like the Bosch Siemens Hausgeräte v. Electrolux decision are reshaping the jurisdictional framework in which the UPC operates, opening the door for far-reaching cross-border injunctions. For patent owners and potential defendants alike, the message is clear: the UPC is here to stay and will become more important year by year. Those who invest the time to understand its dynamics now – including its alignment with the EPO, the differences between divisions, and the strategic implications of its procedures – will be in a much better position when the first UPC dispute lands on their desk. Here is the full transcript of the interview: Rolf Claessen:Today's interview guest is Prof. Aloys Hüttermann. He is founder and equity partner of my firm, Michalski · Hüttermann & Partner. More importantly for today's interview, he has written several books about the Unified Patent Court. The first one already came out in 2016. He is co-editor and author of one of the leading commentaries on the UPC and has gained substantial experience in UPC cases so far – one of them even together with me. Thank you very much for being on IP Fridays again, Aloys. Aloys Hüttermann:Thank you for inviting me, it's an honour. How did you get so deeply involved in the UPC? Rolf Claessen:Before we dive into the details, how did you end up so deeply involved in the Unified Patent Court? And what personally fascinates you about this court? Aloys Hüttermann:This goes back quite a while – roughly 13 years. At that time it became clear that, after several failed attempts, Europe would really get a pan-European court and a pan-European patent, and that this time it was serious. I thought: this is going to be the future. That interested me a lot, both intellectually and practically. A completely new system was being built. You could watch how it evolved – and, if possible, even help shape it a bit. It was also obvious to me that this would be a complete game changer. Nobody expected that it would take until 2023 before the system actually started operating, but now it is here. I became heavily interested early on. As you mentioned, my first book on the UPC was published in 2016, in the expectation that the system would start soon. It took a bit longer, but now we finally have it. UPC vs. US and China – speed, cost and impact Rolf Claessen:Before we go deeper into the UPC, let's zoom out. If you compare litigation before the UPC with patent litigation in the US and in China – in terms of speed, cost and the impact of decisions – what are the key differences that a business leader should understand? Aloys Hüttermann:If you look at the three big regions – the UPC territory in Europe, the US and China – these are the major economic areas for many technology companies. One important point is territorial reach. In the UPC, if the conditions are met, you can get pan-European injunctions that cover many EU Member States in one go. We will talk about this later in more detail. On costs there is a huge difference between the US and the UPC. The UPC is much cheaper than US litigation, especially once you look at the number of countries you can cover with one case if the patent has been validated widely. China is different again. The number of patent infringement cases there is enormous. I have seen statistics of around 40,000 infringement cases per year in China. That is huge – compared with roughly 164 UPC infringement cases in the first year and maybe around 200 in the current year. On speed, Chinese courts are known to be very fast. You often get a first-instance decision in about a year. The UPC is comparable: if there is a counterclaim for revocation, you are looking at something like 12 to 15 months for a first-instance decision. The US can be slower, and the procedure is very different. You have full discovery, you may have juries. None of that exists at the UPC. From that perspective, Chinese and UPC proceedings are more similar to each other than either is to the US. The UPC is still a young court. We have to see how influential its case law will be worldwide in the long run. What we already see, at least in Germany, is a clear trend away from purely national patent litigation and towards the UPC. That is inside Europe. The global impact will develop over time. When is the UPC the most powerful tool? Rolf Claessen:Let's take the perspective of a global company. It has significant sales in Europe and in the US and production or key suppliers in China. In which situations would you say the UPC is your most powerful tool? And when might the US or China be the more strategic battleground? Aloys Hüttermann:To be honest, I would almost always consider bringing a case before the UPC. The “bang for the buck” is very good. The UPC is rather fast. That alone already gives you leverage in negotiations. The threat of a quick, wide-reaching injunction is a strong negotiation tool. Whether you litigate in the US instead of the UPC, or in addition, or whether you also go to China – that depends heavily on the individual case: where the products are sold, where the key markets are, where the defendant has assets, and so on. But in my view, once you have substantial sales in Europe, you should seriously consider the UPC. And for that reason alone I expect case numbers at the UPC to increase significantly in the coming years. A landmark UPC case: Syngenta vs. Sumitomo (composition patent) Rolf Claessen:You have already been involved in several UPC cases – and one of them together with me, which was great fun. Looking at the last 12 to 18 months, is there a case, decision or development that you find particularly noteworthy – something that really changed how you think about UPC litigation or how companies should prepare? Aloys Hüttermann:The most important UPC case I have been involved in so far is the Syngenta v. Sumitomo case on a composition patent. It has become a real landmark and was even mentioned in the UPC's annual report. It is important for several reasons. First, it was one of the first cases in which the Court of Appeal said very clearly: if you have established infringement in one Member State, that will usually be enough for a pan-European injunction covering all UPC countries designated by the patent. That is a powerful statement about the reach of UPC relief. Second, the facts were interesting. The patent concerned a composition. We had analysed a sample that had been obtained in the Czech Republic, which is not a UPC country. Later, the same product was marketed under the same name in Bulgaria, which is in the UPC. The question was whether the analysis of the Czech sample could be used as a basis for enforcement in Bulgaria. The Court of Appeal said yes, that was sufficient. Third, the Court of Appeal took the opportunity to say something about inventive step. It more or less confirmed that the UPC's approach is very close to the EPO's problem-solution approach. It emphasised that, if you want to combine prior-art documents, you need a “pointer” to do so. The mere theoretical possibility that a skilled person could dig a particular piece of information out of a document is not enough. For me personally, the most memorable aspect of this case was not the outcome – that was largely in line with what we had expected – but the oral hearings at the appeal stage. We had two hearings. In both, the presiding judge asked us a question that we had not anticipated at all. And then you have about 20 minutes to come up with a convincing answer while the hearing continues. We managed it, but it made me think a lot about how you should prepare for oral hearings at the UPC. My conclusion is: you should go in with a team, but not too big. In German we say, “Zu viele Köche verderben den Brei” – too many cooks spoil the broth. Two or three people seems ideal. One of them can work quietly on such a surprise question at the side, while the others continue arguing the case. In the end the case went very well for us, so I can speak about it quite calmly now. But in the moment your heart rate definitely goes up. The CJEU's Bosch Siemens Hausgeräte v. Electrolux decision – a real game changer Rolf Claessen:You also mentioned another development that is not even a UPC case, but still very important for European patent litigation. Aloys Hüttermann:Yes. In my view, the most important case of the last twelve months is not a UPC decision but a judgment of the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU): Bosch Siemens Hausgeräte v. Electrolux. This is going to be a real game changer for European IP law, and I am sure we have not seen the end of its effects yet. One example: someone has recently sued BMW before the Landgericht München I, a German court, for infringement of a US patent based on acts in the US. The argument is that this could be backed by the logic of Bosch Siemens Hausgeräte v. Electrolux. We do not know yet what the court will do with that, but the fact that people are trying this shows how far-reaching the decision might be. Within the UPC we have already seen injunctions being issued for countries outside the UPC territory and even outside the EU, for example including the UK. So you see how these developments start to interact. Rolf Claessen:For listeners who have not followed the case so closely: in very simple terms, the CJEU opened the door for courts in one EU country to rule on patent infringement that took place in other countries as well, right? Aloys Hüttermann:Exactly. Before Bosch Siemens Hausgeräte v. Electrolux we had what was often called the GAT/LuK regime. The basic idea was: if you sue someone in, say, Germany for infringement of a European patent, and you also ask for an injunction for France, and the defendant then challenges the validity of the patent in France, the German court cannot grant you an injunction covering France. The Bosch decision changed that. The legal basis is the Brussels I Recast Regulation (Brussels Ia), which deals with jurisdiction in civil and commercial matters in the EU. It is not specific to IP; it applies to civil cases generally, but it does have some provisions that are relevant for patents. In Bosch, a Swedish court asked the CJEU for guidance on cross-border injunctions. The CJEU more or less overturned its old GAT/LuK case law. Now, in principle, if the defendant is domiciled in a particular Member State, the courts of that state can also grant cross-border relief for other countries, under certain conditions. We will not go into all the details here – that could fill a whole separate IP Fridays episode – but one important concept is the “anchor defendant”. If you sue a group of companies and at least one defendant is domiciled in the forum state, then other group companies in other countries – even outside the EU, for example in Hong Kong – can be drawn into the case and affected by the decision. This is not limited to the UPC, but of course it is highly relevant for UPC litigation. Statistically it increases the chances that at least one defendant will be domiciled in a UPC country, simply because there are many of them. And we have already seen courts like the Landgericht München I grant pan-European injunctions for around 20 countries in a pharmaceutical case. Rolf Claessen:Just to clarify: does it have to be the headquarters of the defendant in that country, or is any registered office enough? Aloys Hüttermann:That is one of the open points. If the headquarters are in Europe, then it is clear that subsidiaries outside Europe can be affected as well. If the group's headquarters are outside Europe and only a subsidiary is here, the situation is less clear and we will have to see what the courts make of it. Does the UPC follow EPO case law? Rolf Claessen:Many patent owners and in-house counsel wonder: does the UPC largely follow the case law of the EPO Boards of Appeal, or is it starting to develop its own distinct line? What is your impression so far – both on substantive issues like novelty and inventive step, and on procedural questions? Aloys Hüttermann:On procedure the UPC is, of course, very different. It has its own procedural rules and they are not the same as at the EPO. If we look at patent validity, however, my impression is that there is “nothing new under the sun” – that was the title of a recent talk I gave and will give again in Hamburg. Substantively, the case law of the UPC and the EPO is very similar. For inventive step, people sometimes say the UPC does not use the classical problem-solution approach but a more “holistic” approach – whatever that is supposed to mean. In practice, in both systems you read and interpret prior-art documents and decide what they really disclose. In my view, the “error bar” that comes from two courts simply reading a document slightly differently is much larger than any systematic difference in legal approach. If you look at other grounds, such as novelty and added matter, the UPC even follows the EPO almost verbatim. The famous “gold standard” for added matter appears all over UPC decisions, even if the EPO case numbers are not always cited. The same is true for novelty. So the rule-based, almost “Hilbertian” EPO approach is very much present at the UPC. There is also a structural reason for that. All patents that the UPC currently deals with have been granted by the EPO. The UPC does not handle patents granted only by national offices. If the UPC wanted to deviate from EPO case law and be more generous, then many patents would never reach the UPC in the first place. The most generous approach you can have is the one used by the granting authority – the EPO. So if the UPC wants to be different, it can only be stricter, not more lenient. And there is little incentive to be systematically stricter, because that would reduce the number of patents that are attractive to enforce before the UPC. Patent owners might simply opt out. Rolf Claessen:We also talked about added matter and a recent case where the Court of Appeal was even stricter than the EPO. That probably gives US patent practitioners a massive headache. They already struggle with added-matter rules in Europe, and now the UPC might be even tougher. Aloys Hüttermann:Yes, especially on added matter. I once spoke with a US practitioner who said, “We hope the UPC will move away from intermediate generalisations.” There is no chance of that. We already have cases where the Court of Appeal confirmed that intermediate generalisations are not allowed, in full alignment with the EPO. You mentioned a recent case where a patent was revoked for added matter, even though it had been granted by the EPO in exactly that form. This shows quite nicely what to expect. If you want to predict how the UPC will handle a revocation action, the best starting point is to ask: “What would the EPO do?” Of course, there will still be cases where the UPC finds an invention to be inventive while the EPO, in parallel opposition proceedings, does not – or vice versa. But those are differences in the appreciation of the facts and the prior art, which you will always have. The underlying legal approach is essentially the same. Rolf Claessen:So you do not see a real example yet where the UPC has taken a totally different route from the EPO on validity? Aloys Hüttermann:No, not really. If I had to estimate how the UPC will decide, I would always start from what I think the EPO would have done. Trends in UPC practice: PIs, equivalents, interim conferences Rolf Claessen:If you look across the different UPC divisions and cases: what trends do you see in practice? For example regarding timelines, preliminary injunctions, how validity attacks are handled, and how UPC cases interact with EPO oppositions or national proceedings? Aloys Hüttermann:If you take the most active divisions – essentially the big four in Germany and the local division in The Hague – they all try to be very careful and diligent in their decisions. But you can already see some differences in practice. For preliminary injunctions there is a clear distinction between the local division in Düsseldorf and most other divisions. Düsseldorf considers one month after knowledge of the infringement as still sufficiently urgent. If you wait longer, it is usually considered too late. In many other divisions, two months is still viewed as fine. Düsseldorf has also been the division that issued most of the ex parte preliminary injunctions so far. Apart from one special outlier where a standing judge from Brussels was temporarily sitting in Milan, Düsseldorf is basically the only one. Other divisions have been much more reluctant. At a conference, Judge Pichlmaier from the Munich division once said that he could hardly imagine a situation where his division would grant an ex parte PI. In his words, the UPC has two types of procedure: one that is fast – the normal main action – and one that is very fast – the inter partes PI procedure. But you do not really have an “ultra-fast” ex parte track, at least not in his division. Another difference relates to amendments and auxiliary requests in PI proceedings. In one recent case in Munich the court said more or less that if you have to amend your patent or rely on auxiliary requests in a PI, you lose. Other divisions have been more flexible and have allowed auxiliary requests. Equivalence is another area where we do not have a unified line yet. So far, only the Hague division has clearly found infringement under the doctrine of equivalents and explicitly used a test taken from Dutch law. Whether that test will be approved by the Court of Appeal is completely open – the first case settled, so the Court of Appeal never ruled on it, and a second one is still very recent. Interestingly, there was another Hague decision a few weeks ago where equivalence was on the table, but the division did not apply that Dutch-law test. We do not know yet why. The Mannheim division has written in one decision that it would be desirable to develop an autonomous pan-European test for equivalence, instead of just importing the German, UK or Dutch criteria. But they did not formulate such a test in that case because it was not necessary for the decision. So we will have to see how that evolves. On timelines, one practical difference is that Düsseldorf usually does not hold an interim conference. That saves them some time. Most other divisions do hold interim conferences. Personally, I like the idea because it can help clarify issues. But you cannot safely read the final outcome from these conferences. I have also seen cases where questions raised at the interim conference did not play any role in the main oral hearing. So they are useful for clarification, but not as a crystal ball. Front-loaded proceedings and typical strategic mistakes Rolf Claessen:If you look at the behaviour of parties so far – both patentees and defendants – what are the most common strategic mistakes you see in UPC litigation? And what would a well-prepared company do differently before the first statement of claim is ever filed? Aloys Hüttermann:You know you do not really want me to answer that question… Rolf Claessen:I do! Aloys Hüttermann:All right. The biggest mistake, of course, is that they do not hire me. That is the main problem. Seriously, it is difficult to judge parties' behaviour from the outside. You rarely know the full picture. There may be national proceedings, licensing discussions, settlement talks, and so on in the background. That can limit what a party can do at the UPC. So instead of criticising, I prefer to say what is a good idea at the UPC. The system is very front-loaded and very fast. If you are sued, you have three months to file your statement of defence and your counterclaim for revocation. In my view, three months are manageable – but only if you use the time wisely and do not waste it on things that are not essential. If you receive a statement of claim, you have to act immediately. You should have a clear strategy within maybe two or three weeks and then implement it. If you change your strategy every few weeks, chances are high that you will fail. Another point is that everything is front-loaded. It is very hard to introduce new documents or new attacks later. Some divisions have been a bit generous in individual cases, but the general line is strict. We have seen, for example, that even if you filed a book in first instance, you may not be allowed to rely on a different chapter from the same book for a new inventive-step attack at the appeal stage. That can be regarded as late-filed, because you could have done it earlier. There is also case law saying that if you first argue inventive step as “D1 plus D2”, and later want to argue “D2 plus D1”, that can already be considered a new, late attack. On the other hand, we had a revocation action where the plaintiff filed about 50 different inventive-step attacks in the initial brief. The division then said: this does not work. Please cut them down or put them in a clear hierarchy. In the end, not all of them were considered. The UPC does not conduct an ex officio examination. It is entitled to manage the case and to tell the parties to limit themselves in the interest of a fair and efficient procedure. Rolf Claessen:I have the feeling that the EPO is also becoming more front-loaded – if you want to rely on documents later, you should file them early. But it sounds like the UPC is even more extreme in that regard. Aloys Hüttermann:Yes, that is true. Protective letters, inspections and the defendant's perspective Rolf Claessen:Suppose someone from a company is listening now and thinks: “We might be exposed at the UPC,” or, “We should maybe use the UPC offensively against competitors.” What would you consider sensible first steps before any concrete dispute arises? And looking three to five years ahead, how central do you expect the UPC to become in global patent litigation compared to the US and China? Aloys Hüttermann:Let me start with the second part. I expect the UPC to become significantly more important. If we have around 200 cases this year, that is a good start, but it is still very small compared to, say, 4,000 to 5,000 patent cases per year in the US and 40,000 or so in China. Even François Bürgin and Klaus Grabinski, in interviews, have said that they are happy with the case load, but the potential is much larger. In my view, it is almost inevitable that we will see four or five times as many UPC cases in the not-too-distant future. As numbers grow, the influence of the UPC will grow as well. Whether, in five or ten years, companies will treat the UPC as their first choice forum – or whether they will usually run it in parallel with US litigation in major disputes – remains to be seen. The UPC would be well equipped for that: the territory it covers is large, Europe is still an important economy, and the UPC procedure is very attractive from a company's perspective. On sensible first steps: if you are worried about being sued, a protective letter can make a lot of sense – especially in divisions like Düsseldorf, where ex parte PIs are possible in principle. A protective letter is not very expensive in terms of court fees. There is also an internal system that ensures the court reads it before deciding on urgent measures. Of course, the content must have a certain quality; a poor protective letter can even backfire. If you are planning to sue someone before the UPC, you should be extremely well prepared when you file. You should already have all important documents and evidence at hand. As we discussed, it is hard to introduce new material later. One tool that is becoming more and more popular is inspection – not just at trade fairs, where we already saw cases very early, but also at company premises. Our firm has already handled such an inspection case. That is something you should keep in mind on both sides: it is a powerful evidence-gathering tool, but also a serious risk if you are on the receiving end. From the defendant's perspective, I do not think the UPC is unfair. If you do your job properly and put a solid revocation counterclaim on the table, then the patentee has only two months to prepare a full reply and all auxiliary requests. And there is a twist that makes life even harder for the patentee than at the EPO. At the EPO the question is mainly: do my auxiliary requests overcome the objections and are they patentable? At the UPC there is an additional layer: do I still have infringement under the amended claims? You may save your patent with an auxiliary request that no longer reads on the defendant's product. That is great for validity, but you have just lost the infringement case. You have kept the patent but lost the battle. And all of this under very tight time limits. That creates considerable pressure on both sides. How to contact Prof. Hüttermann Rolf Claessen:Thank you very much for this really great interview, Aloys. Inside our firm you have a nickname: “the walking encyclopedia of the Unified Patent Court” – because you have written so many books about it and have dealt with the UPC for such a long time. What is the best way for listeners to get in touch with you? Aloys Hüttermann:The easiest way is by email. You can simply write to me, and that is usually the best way to contact me. As you may have noticed, I also like to speak. I am a frequent speaker at conferences. If you happen to be at one of the conferences where I am on the programme – for example, next week in Hamburg – feel free to come up to me and ask me anything in person. But email is probably the most reliable first step. Rolf Claessen:Perfect. Thank you very much, Aloys. Aloys Hüttermann:Thank you. It was a pleasure to be on IP Fridays again. Some of your long-time listeners may remember that a few years ago – when you were not yet part of our firm – we already did an episode on the UPC, back when everything was still very speculative. It is great to be back now that the system is actually in place and working. Rolf Claessen:I am very happy to have you back on the show.

Ken Holland, the legendary hockey executive, joins the show to discuss his surprising move to become Vice President and General Manager of the Los Angeles Kings. After a distinguished career that included building championship teams in Detroit and Edmonton, Holland shares insights on his transition to LA, his philosophy on team building, and what it takes to construct a Stanley Cup contender in the modern NHL.IN THIS EPISODE:[00:00] - Ken Holland joins the show and discusses his unexpected move to become VP/GM of the Los Angeles Kings after a stint in the NHL's hockey operations department.[01:00] - The Western roots that made the LA opportunity attractive, and Holland's relationship with Luke Robitaille and the Anschutz ownership group.[02:00] - A lighthearted look back at Holland's near-career as an Electrolux vacuum salesman before Neil Smith and Jim Devellano recruited him as a scout in 1985.[03:00] - Holland's analysis of his former team, the Edmonton Oilers, and what makes them different in their current playoff run.[05:00] - The Stuart Skinner question: understanding goaltender consistency and the pressure of playing in Canada with elite forwards.[07:00] - Holland's first priorities as Kings GM: decisions on key unrestricted free agents including Matt Roy on defense and David Rittich in goal.[10:00] - How team building has evolved over 30 years in the NHL, from Holland's days with Detroit to the modern salary cap era.[12:00] - The most important decisions a GM makes: the coach and the goaltender, plus the critical role of defensive structure.[15:00] - Evaluating Darcy Kuemper and the Kings' goaltending situation moving forward.[17:00] - Building the perfect roster: size, speed, skill, compete level, and why it's a two-goalie league.[20:00] - Will the league shift toward physicality after Florida's success, or will skill players remain premium assets?[23:00] - Holland's thoughts on the remaining playoff teams and what makes championship-caliber organizations.[25:00] - Reflecting on the mentorship of Neil Smith and Jim Devellano, and how a phone call in 1985 changed everything.X: https://twitter.com/NHLWraparoundNeil Smith: https://twitter.com/NYCNeilVic Morren: https://www.linkedin.com/in/vic-morren-7038737/NHL Wraparound Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/nhlwraparound/#NHLWraparound #KenHolland #LosAngelesKings #EdmontonOilers #NeilSmith #VicMorren #NHL #DetroitRedWings #StuartSkinner #DarcyKuemper #LukeRobitaille #StanleyCup #HockeyGM #CalvinPickard #DrewDoughty #MattRoy #DavidRittich #RobBlake #BillRanford #WarrenFoegele #QuintonByfield #BrandtClarke #JimmyDevellano #ScottyBowman #ChrisChelios #Nicklidstrom #ConnorMcDavid #LeonDraisaitl #MattiaasEkholm #ChrisOsgood

How do you keep hotel laundry running when every minute counts? In today's episode, Steve Carran sits down on the trade show floor with Zach Yaeger, Business Development Manager at LaundryLux — a company making major waves in the hotel laundry and commercial laundry space.Zach shares how he went from college intern to spending 12+ years growing with LaundryLux, why their European-engineered Electrolux equipment is changing the game for hotels, and the biggest challenges they solve for hoteliers — especially fast lead times, reliability, and utility savings.What you'll learn in this episode: How LaundryLux stands out from other laundry companiesWhy technology and efficiency are becoming critical in hotel laundry roomsHow fast lead times and stocked equipment protect hotels from downtimeThe future of laundry in hospitality and growing demand nationwideWatch the FULL EPISODE on YouTube: https://youtu.be/WxkMXOo7Y2wLinks:Zach on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/zach-yaeger-77ab9499/LaundryLux: https://laundrylux.com/For full show notes head to: https://themodernhotelier.com/episode/228Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-...Join the conversation on today's episode on The Modern Hotelier LinkedIn pageConnect with Steve and David:Steve: https://www.linkedin.com/in/%F0%9F%8E...David: https://www.linkedin.com/in/david-mil.

Donald Trump sänker tullarna och hyllar Xi Jingping efter mötet i Sydkorea. Blandad utveckling i Asien. Försiktigt uttalande av Fed-chefen Jerome Powell pressade Wall Street efter räntesänkningen. Både rus och ras efter Mag 7-rapporternaPå hemmaplan har Electrolux släppt siffror

Nesse encontro reaprendi, atualizei e mudei minhas percepções sobre aposentadoria de recomeço voltada para quem planeja iniciar seu próprio negócio. Se antes tinha certezas, agora tenho muita curiosidade e vontade de ir mais a fundo. Este é meu convite para um instigante e didatico conteúdo com Maria Augusta Orofino, ou simplesmente “Guta”, que vem se destacando como uma influente especialista no tema Empreendedorismo e Inovação para o publico Senior 50+, com anos ministrando treinamentos, cursos, mentorias e consultorias a muitos executivos e empresarios no Brasil. Ela é Mestre em Gestão do Conhecimento com cursos de extensão realizados na Duke Universitye UC Berkeley –USA e Universidade de Barcelona -Espanha, considerada como um dos 50 nomes multiplicadores da criatividade no Brasil, em 2022, pela revista WiredFestival e premiada pela ABTD-PR como Personalidade do Ano em RH, em 2021 e Top ofMind HSM Academy2021 e 2022, com um portfólio que inclui empresas como: M. Dias Branco, Vale, TIM, Claro, Electrolux, Ultracargo, Mitutoyo, DOW Quimica, Abbot, Unilever entre outras. Autora do livro Liderança para Inovação. Co-autora dos livros Jornada Ágil, Business Model You, Estrategista Visual e #BoraInspirar. Professora da ESPM, HSM Academye Sustentare. Conteudista e apresentadora de programas de capacitação na UOL Edtech, Grupo Anima e HSM University. Após toda essa vivencia e experiencia ao longo de sua carreira desenvolveu um método único e constantemente atualizado, especialmente pensado para profissionais que passam anos adquirindo habilidades e conhecimento dentro das empresas, mas que em dado momento da vida sentem que chegou o momento de escrever um novo capítulo da sua história. Através da mentoria pelo MÉTODO SILVER - Empreende 50+, Guta auxilia diversas empresas a saírem do sonho distante para o mundo real ou digital! Atualmente seus projetos preparam empresas para os desafios do futuro do trabalho, aliando estratégia, cultura e desenvolvimento de pessoas. Sua crença se baseia em que a transformação das organizações começa por inspirar e fortalecer indivíduos, por isso, cada ação que conduz busca gerar não apenas resultados sustentáveis, mas também relações de confiança, engajamento e propósito. Vem conosco se questionar se este é um caminho possível para o seu futuro e validar se há novos dados, fatos, conhecimentos que possam acender a chama de inovação que despertará seu instinto de empresário Senior. Afinal de contas, parafraseando um dito popular: empreender e coçar, é só começar! Para contatar nossa convidada ou saber mais do tema: LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/mariaaugustaorofino/Site: www.mariaaugusta.com.brInstagram: @‌mariaaugustaorofino Ou contate diretamente através do e-mail falecom@mariaaugusta.com.br ! Acompanhe o Tábula Rasa nas redes sociais:– Facebook– Instagram– LinkedIn– Threads– X/Twitter– YouTube Ouça o Tábula Rasa nos principais agregadores:- Spotify- Apple Podcasts- Deezer- Amazon Music- PocketCasts O Tabula Rasa é produzido pela Rádiofobia Podcast e Multimídia e publicado pela Rádiofobia Podcast Network.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

 Bhavana Mittal | Co-Founder,  Executive Director, Chief Growth Officer Bert labs Awarded Marketing, Media, Digital professional, Speaker, Advisory Board Member and Jury member for various industry associations, Yoga teacher (YT200) with 25+ years of experience. At Bert Labs, Bhavana plays a crucial role with intertwined functions. She serves as the visionary leader, setting the strategic direction for the company and ensuring that its mission aligns with the rapidly evolving tech landscape. She provides overall guidance, supervises the executive team, and maintain a strong connection with the board of directors to secure support for innovative ventures.On the other hand, at Bert Labs Bhavana fuels growth in the dynamic environment. She identifies opportunities, forging strategic partnerships, and driving revenue through the introduction of Bert Platform Solution and products in the market. She keeps a keen eye on market trends, harnessing data analytics to inform product development and marketing strategies, and fostering customer engagement to ensure the company's offerings are precisely tailored to meet emerging requirements. Bhavana drives the leadership team that balances visionary direction with actionable growth initiatives, propelling Bert Labs to success in the competitive tech landscape.Her career trajectory prior to Bert Labs has been:VP (Head) – Media and Digital at RPSG Group where Bhavana worked across all the Group businesses, including Saregama Caravan, Too Yumm!, Naturali, Spencer's, Nature's Basket, Fortune India, Open, Hello! Magazine, RPSG Sports (including Lucknow SuperGiants)Regional Head – Media, Digital and Communication, South Asia at Reckitt Benckiser, working across Digital and Media for all brands including Dettol, Durex, Harpic, Lizol, Vanish, Veet etc. Was a part of the integration team for Mead Johnson into RB. India represenative for Digital CoEHead – Media and CSR, India Sub-continent for GSK Consumer Healthcare, working across all brands including Horlicks, Boost, Eno, Crocin, Iodex, etc. Launched Sensodyne in India successfully. Headed Indirect Procurement for the initial 2 years. Was a part of the integration team for Novartisinto GSKCH. Led Global taskforce for strategic initiatives Manager and Head, Media Audit as part of Accenture Consulting. Set up the practice for Indian and International ClientsMedia Director/Head of Media at Cheil Communications, for Samsung and Hyundai business. Launched Samsung Mobile phones and LEDs, Samsung Side-by-side refrigerators, Hyundai Tuscon and Hyundai Sonata during her stint Media Director at Initiative Media for LG, Revlon and Nestle business Manager at Maximize (GroupM) for NIIT, Electrolux, JK Tyres business Media Supervisor at Universal McCann for Reckitt Benckiser, Indiatimes Media Executive at Saatchi & Saatchi, launched Hyundai, Santro and Accent in India Industry  

Send us a textWelcome to another episode of Laundromat Resource! In this week's edition of Laundromat News Today, your New Anchor Jordan Berry dives into the latest happenings shaping the laundromat industry. From highlights at the recent Clean Show—including Maytag's Outstanding Distributor Awards and exciting innovation winners like Electrolux's new Tosai combo washer-dryer—to must-attend upcoming events like the Laundry CEO Forum in Dallas and the exclusive Laundromat Accelerator retreat in Hawaii, Jordan has you covered. Plus, get the scoop on celebrity encounters in laundromats (hello, Mike Tyson!), the growing impact of major brands like Tide and Kathy Ireland Laundry, and why building a strong laundromat brand is more crucial than ever. Tune in for industry insights, practical tips, and all the big news that's making real waves in the world of laundromats.Show notes: https://www.laundromatresource.com/laundromat-news-september-06-2025/Have news, big or small, about your laundromat or your laundromat industry-supporting business? Send your press release to news@laundromatresource.com to be featured on a future episode of Laundromat News Today.Don't Miss Out! Make sure you're subscribed to the Laundromat Resource Newsletter to catch all links, articles, and updates from this and every episode. If you have thoughts on AI folding robots—or anything else laundromat related—reply and let us know! We love hearing from you.Join us in Hawaii for the Laundromat Accelerator Hawaii!https://laundromatresource.com/hawaiiLaundry CEO Forum Returns to Dallas - October 5-7, 2025, with Exclusive CEO-Level Programming for Laundry Leadershttps://www.laundromatresource.com/laundry-ceo-forum-returns-to-dallas-october-57-2025-with-exclusive-ceo-level-programming-for-laundry-leaders/Connect With UsYouTubeInstagramFacebookLinkedInTwitterTikTok

Ana Vernaza, gerente general de Electrolux para la región Andina by Diario La república

Guest: Alex Smereczniak— Serial entrepreneur, former CEO of 2ULaundry & Laundry Lab (over $100M valuation, 118 franchises sold), founder of Franzy (30,000+ monthly users, $3M+ raised to help people buy “cash-flowing” businesses). Early Hustles & First Big Win: Started with classic entrepreneurial pursuits: trading cards, washing cars as a kid, and then running a laundry delivery business (“Wake Wash”) in college, which he bought for $30,000 and sold for nearly $300,000 after systematizing and scaling it. Learned about discounted cash flow, buy/sell agreements, and the real value of recurring cash flow and business structure early on. Scaling, Strategy, and Differentiation: Moved from a student business to working for a Big Four consulting firm (Ernst & Young), but quickly realized he needed to build businesses—not just advise them. Launched 2ULaundry in 2016: delivered laundry/dry cleaning to homes and businesses, quickly scaling through tech and operations, later vertically integrating by building brick-and-mortar laundromats with Electrolux, and ultimately franchising the model for rapid growth. Grew Laundry Lab to 118 franchise awards and 30 locations open as of 2025. Laundromats as a Business Model: Low failure rate due to essential, “recession proof” services—people always need clean clothes—combined with cash-flow and passive income advantages. The “Power Play”: Buy from retiring owners, retool equipment over time, tap into durable local demand. Challenges, Automation & Venture Backing: Success meant more than cash-flow: his companies required operational discipline, vertical integration, and large capital outlays (laundromat builds exceed $1M). Venture capital was attracted by the “Uber for Laundry” home-delivery angle, but Alex's model matured into a blend of tech, local infrastructure, and scalable franchising. Why Franchising Needs Disruption — Enter Franzy: Traditional franchise placement is “Wild West,” with brokers sometimes pocketing up to 60% of franchise fees, influencing which opportunities new entrepreneurs see. Franzy's mission: Take a “Zillow for Franchising” approach—leverage AI for franchise matching (across 4000+ brands), standardized fees, and transparency to empower more everyday people to buy real businesses. Focuses on each buyer's risk profile, lifestyle, and goals; not just “make the most money,” but “fit the best business to the person.” Franchise Trends & Business Models to Watch: Still bullish on laundromats for certain profiles (cash-flow, de-risked, lifestyle), but now sees huge growth in health & wellness, home services, and viral consumer brands (e.g. PopUp Bagels, HRT clinics, anything innovating with AI or “cult” followings). Anticipates continued “displacement” of white-collar jobs by AI; business ownership, franchising, and “betting on yourself” are the safest long-term play for income and autonomy. Connect with Alex & Learn More: https://franzy.com/ https://www.instagram.com/alexfromfranzy/

In today's high-volume service environments, the smallest misstep can erode both efficiency and customer trust. In this episode, Eric Rivas, Director for Service Repair at Electrolux, joins Emerj Editorial Director Matthew DeMello to share how frontline data and technician expertise can be better captured, organized, and applied to deliver consistent, first-visit success. Rivas advises service leaders on best practices for approaching the challenges of tribal knowledge transfer, skill development, and diagnostic accuracy in large service organizations. He also breaks down the build-versus-buy dilemma facing many service leaders when it comes to new technology—and why effective partnerships often prove more valuable than internal development. Listeners will gain insights into balancing efficiency with reliability, empowering frontline teams, and building long-term trust with customers at scale. Want to share your AI adoption story with executive peers? Click emerj.com/expert2 for more information and to be a potential future guest on the ‘AI in Business' podcast! This episode is sponsored by Aquant. Learn how brands work with Emerj and other Emerj Media options at emerj.com/ad1.

Swedbank sticker ut hakan och tror på två räntesänkningar till i år. Intervju med chefsekonom Mattias Persson i studion. • Di:s analytiker Magnus Dagel tror att Electrolux snart tvingas till nyemission. Programledare: Fredrik Lennander och Noel Henriksson

In dieser Episode begrüßt Host Florian Vette den E-Commerce-Experten Andreas Lotz, Director Amazon Europe bei der Electrolux Group, zu der bekannte Marken wie AEG und Electrolux gehören. Gemeinsam sprechen sie über die Herausforderungen und Strategien, um Haushaltsgeräte erfolgreich auf Marktplätzen wie Amazon zu verkaufen. Es geht um zentrale Themen wie die Abwägung zwischen Brand Awareness und Performance Marketing, die Rolle von Retail Media sowie den Einfluss von Marktplätzen auf die gesamte Customer Journey. Besonders spannend: Immer mehr Konsumenten beginnen ihre Produktsuche direkt auf Amazon, während sie für größere Anschaffungen nicht selten physische Touchpoints im Einzelhandel nutzen. Wie begegnet Electrolux diesem hybriden Kaufverhalten? Ein weiteres Kernthema ist die Bedeutung von Installationsservices im Online-Handel. Andreas erklärt, wie Electrolux gemeinsam mit Amazon die Services für Großgeräte optimiert hat – von der Lieferung über den Anschluss bis hin zur Verpackungsentsorgung. Dabei wird deutlich: Eine reibungslose Customer Experience ist entscheidend, um Kunden langfristig an die Marke zu binden. Abgerundet wird das Gespräch mit einem Blick auf die Organisationsstruktur von Electrolux im Marktplatzgeschäft: Wie sind Vendor- und Seller-Modelle aufgeteilt? Wie optimiert Electrolux die Supply Chain gemeinsam mit Amazon? Und wie sieht die Zukunft von Marktplätzen in der Haushaltsgerätebranche aus?

Vi gästas av Johan Säwensten, Sverigechef på Position Green, för ett samtal om ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) och framtidens hållbarhetsrapportering. Avsnittet belyser en avgörande förflyttning: från idealistiska eldsjälar till datadriven affärsstrategi. Vad är ESG, egentligen? Johan Säwensten, med 15 års erfarenhet i branschen, inleder med att bryta ner det komplexa begreppet ESG. Han förklarar det som ett skifte från Milton Friedmans klassiska idé om att "the business of business is doing business" till en modern syn där företag måste ta ansvar för sin bredare påverkan, på allt från medarbetare och lokalsamhälle till globala utsläpp. Det handlar om att se bortom den finansiella rapporten och förstå hela sitt avtryck. Från passion till press och compliance Utvecklingen inom hållbarhet har varit dramatisk. Johan beskriver resan från att vd:ar agerade utifrån dåligt samvete efter samtal med sina barn, till dagens verklighet där ESG drivs av: Marknadskrav: Kunder och investerare ställer högre krav. Affärsmöjligheter: Företag som Polestar och Electrolux använder proaktivt hållbarhetsarbete för att vinna marknadsandelar och till och med påverka lagstiftning. Regleringar: EU har de senaste åren skapat ett starkt tryck genom nya lagkrav, även om man just nu ser en viss osäkerhet och tillbakadragning i regleringstakten. "What gets measured gets managed" – Digitaliseringens nyckelroll En central punkt i samtalet är hur digitaliseringen blivit en förutsättning för modernt hållbarhetsarbete. Borta är tiden då tex en ensam miljöingenjör manuellt sammanställde data i Excel. Idag växer en helt ny bransch av "affärssystem för hållbarhet" fram. Farhågan finns om att rapporteringen nästan blivit viktigare än själva hållbarhetsarbetet. Johan håller med om att det varit en tendens under de senaste årens intensiva regleringsfokus, men ser nu en återgång till att använda data för att faktiskt förbättra verksamheten, inte bara för att fylla i rapporter. Insamling av data, från energiförbrukning och utsläpp från tjänsteresor till sjukfrånvaro och könsfördelning blir grunden för att kunna sätta mätbara mål och se trender. AI som den nya hållbarhetskollegan Framtiden för ESG-rapportering är smartare och mer effektiv. Johan Säwensten berättar hur AI och LLMs (Large Language Models) redan nu används för att: Automatisera datainsamling genom intelligenta agenter. Skapa första utkast av komplexa hållbarhetsrapporter, vilket kan spara upp till 70% av arbetstiden. Agera som en kunskapsbank, där medarbetare kan ställa "dumma frågor" och snabbt få stöd i ett komplext ämne. Johans checklista för att lyckas med ESG-arbetet För organisationer som vill ta sitt hållbarhetsarbete till nästa nivå, delar Johan med sig av några konkreta tips: Säkra förankring i ledningen: Utan stöd från styrelse och ledningsgrupp blir arbetet tungrott. Var datadriven: Använd data för att "skära igenom fluffet" och visa svart på vitt vilken påverkan ni har och vilka resultat era insatser ger. Koppla till affärsstrategin: Hållbarhet får inte vara en separat ö. Det måste integreras i kärnaffären för att vara långsiktigt hållbart – både ekonomiskt och miljömässigt. Addera storytelling: Komplettera den hårda datan med ett högre syfte. Berätta varför ni gör detta. Det engagerar både medarbetare och kunder. Vill du veta mer om hur ditt företag kan gå från manuell hantering till ett datadrivet och strategiskt hållbarhetsarbete? Lyssna på hela avsnittet med Johan Säwensten i podcasten Effekten, direkt i din poddspelare eller på effekten.se! Johan Säwensten , Jonas Jaani (21:57) Videoversion av avsnittet: https://youtu.be/IABnQ007UK4 Länkar / mer information: Om Position GreenPosition Green är ett internationellt SaaS-bolag inom hållbarhetstech som erbjuder en komplett lösning för företag som vill ta sitt hållbarhetsarbete till nästa nivå.

Veckans avsnitt av Stridh hos Frasse är en hyllning till språket – och till alla de missförstånd som får oss att både skratta och skaka på huvudet.  Vi pratar om klassiska översättningsfiaskon där företagens stora planer kraschade på grund av några olyckliga ordval. Som när Electrolux försökte charma USA med "Nothing sucks like an Electrolux", eller när Honda rullade in i Sverige med modellnamnet Fitta… ja, ni kan gissa hur det gick. Två modersmål i studion betyder dubbelt så många språkblunders att analysera – utan att vi påstår oss vara experter. Ni hittar våra målande exempel på språkfadäs i vår Facebook-grupp. Gå in och gilla gärna bilderna. Vill ni ge oss feedback eller komma med förslag på saker vi kan ta upp i vår podd? Maila oss till: stridhhosfrasse@gmail.com

Det finns många intressanta aktier där ute, trots lågkonjunktur och annan oro. Vi går igenom rapportfloden, amerikanska teknikjättar samt vad vi tror om börshösten och den långa trenden. I podden kommer ett bokerbjudande.Aktierna vi nämner i podden är i tur och ordning Sandvik, Atlas Copco, Alfa Laval, Nelly, Dynavox, Note, Betsson, ABB, Hexagon, Tele2, Electrolux, Indutrade, Vitec, Novo Nordisk, Nvidia, Tesla, Apple, Microsoft, Broadcom, SEB, Nordea, Addtech. Lagercrantz. Lundin Mining, Bonesupport, Camurus, I-tech, Plejd, Zinzino, Hansa, Intellego, Coinshare, VNV, VEF, Arjo, Medcap och Linc. Börspanelens alla sajter hittar du här:shows.acast.com/tresmarta/aboutHernhag.seBorspsykologen.seSternersforlag.se Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Inteligența artificială nu mai este doar un concept alviitorului – ea își face loc în viața noastră de zi cu zi, inclusiv în casele noastre. În acest episod din Sustainable Living Podcast, discutăm despre cum AI-ul revoluționează industria electrocasnicelor și contribuie la construirea unui viitor sustenabil.Invitata noastră este Teodora Juravle Mărăcineanu, Marketing Head Electrolux România și CEE Marketing Consumer Direct Interaction, Aftermarket Services. Alături de ea, explorăm cum tehnologiile inteligente dezvoltate de Electrolux sprijină optimizarea consumului de resurse, reducerea risipei alimentare și a energiei, prelungirea duratei de viață a produselor și educarea consumatorilor pentru alegeri mai responsabile.✔️ Descoperă cum funcționează electrocasnicele care învață obiceiurile utilizatorilor și își ajustează setările automat.✔️Află cum AI-ul ajută la integrarea produselor Electrolux cu rețelele inteligente și cum contribuie la economia circulară.✔️Vezi cum aplicațiile mobile, senzorii și inteligența artificială personalizează experiența din locuințele noastre și susțin sustenabilitatea în mod concret.✔️Discutăm și despre valorile nordice integrate în inovațiile Electrolux și modul în care Suedia setează un exemplu global pentru utilizarea responsabilă a AI-ului.Acest sezon al podcastului este susținut de Ambasada Suediei în România, în cadrul seriei AI for a Sustainable Future.#AI #Sustenabilitate #Electrolux #SmartHome #GreenTech#CircularEconomy #Romania #FutureOfLiving #SwedeninRomania#SustainableLivingPodcast 

Rapportsäsongen har nått sitt crescendo. Dagens podd är fylld av tankar och reflektioner från dagens kvartalsrapporter och aktierörelser. Bland annat avhandlas SKF, Epiroc, Betsson, Saab, Engcon, Electrolux, Invisio, Nordnet, Husqvarna, Dynavox, Lyko, Hemnet och Telias bud på Bredband2. Ett välfyllt program utlovas veckans sista handelsdag med Peter Hedlund, Ellinor Beckett, Daniel McPhee och Elin Wiker i poddstudion.Detta är Börslunch Rapportpodd. EFN:s sommarspecial under rapportsäsongen för att du ska kunna vara ledig men ändå få reda på allt du vill och borde om rapporterna.

Lola Akinmade Åkerström is an award-winning visual storyteller, international bestselling author, and travel entrepreneur. She has dispatched from over 80+ countries and her work has been featured in National Geographic, New York Times, The Sunday Times, The Guardian, BBC, CNN, Travel Channel, Travel + Leisure, Lonely Planet, Forbes, and many more. She has collaborated with commercial brands such as Dove, Getty Images, Mercedes Benz, Intrepid Travel, Electrolux, ASUS, and National Geographic Channel, to name a few. As a storyteller, Lola was featured on Condé Nast Traveler's Women Who Travel Power List. She was named one of the Most Influential Women in Travel by Travel Pulse, a 2022 Hasselblad Heroine and Bill Muster Travel Photographer of the Year. She was also honoured with a MIPAD 100 (Most Influential People of African Descent) Award within media and culture and a Newsweek Future of Travel Storytelling Award.  Her book, Due North, received the Lowell Thomas Gold Award for Best Travel Book, and she is also the author of international bestselling "LAGOM: The Swedish Secret of Living Well" available in over 15 foreign language editions.  Her internationally-acclaimed novel, "In Every Mirror She's Black", was a Good Morning America (GMA) Buzz Pick, Apple Editors' Pick, Amazon Editors' Pick,  Independent UK "Best Thought-provoking Story", and was shortlisted for the Bad Form Review Book of the Year. Her novel, EVERYTHING IS NOT ENOUGH, is an NAACP Image Award Nominee for Outstanding Literature, Jennette McCurdy Book Club Pick, a Washington Post, Sunday Times, and Amazon Editors' Pick, amongst others. Her latest novel, BITTER HONEY, was published in May 2025. As an entrepreneur, she runs Stockholm-based creative storytelling agency Geotraveler Media and online academy, Geotraveler Media Academy, which runs photography experiences around the world and is dedicated to visual storytelling and helping the next generation of travel storytellers put the heart back into the craft. To learn more about Lola Akinmade Akerström: Links - Media Kit  |  Portfolio Director, Geotraveler Media Social - LinkedIn | Instagram

Mais um episódio do podcast Caos Corporativo na área!

At the recent Treasury 360° Nordic 2025 conference in Stockholm, Eleanor Hill (TMI) sat down with Paulo Kubis (Electrolux Professional) to discuss how he built a treasury function from the ground up following the company's spin-off.  Paulo shares practical insights on simplifying processes, building a high-performance team, and delivering a standout debut in the Swedish debt capital markets.

O iPhone já é caro, mas ele deverá ficar ainda mais pesado para o nosso bolso. O Hoje no TecMundo desta segunda-feira traz informações sobre o possível aumento de preço do iPhone 17, da Amazon sendo obrigada a cortar os anúncios do Prime Video, do lançamento do Galaxy S25 Edge, da Apple sendo obrigada a abrir o iOS para mais lojas de apps no Brasil e do novo Papa Leão 14 que, segundo ele, escolheu o nome meio que por causa da IA.Vote no TecMundo para o prêmio iBest: https://app.premioibest.com/votacao/canal-de-tecnologia/679047832

Börspsykolog Boström går igen hur vi ska hantera situationen mentalt när allt känns maximalt osäkert. Vi avhandlar även rapportfloden och börstrenden samt hur vi ska hitta och vad som kännetecknar en aktie som 100-faldigas i kurs. En 100-bagger. Dessutom får du en rabattkod på SternersForlag.se.Aktierna vi nämner i aktiepodden är i tur och ordning Munters, Lime Technologies, Volvo, ABB, Atlas Copco, Sandvik, Handelsbanken, Swedbank, Holmen, Ericsson, Electrolux, Volvo Cars, Hexagon, Atlas Copco, Indutrade, Evolution, Xano, Addlife, Addtech, Avanza, Betsson, Embracer, Lifco, OEM, Swedbank, Tele2, Telia, Plejd, Lagercrantz, Zinzino, Betsson, Sdiptech, Momentum Group, Latour, Vitec Software, Hexagon, Beijer Ref och Fortnox.Börspanelens alla sajter hittar du här:shows.acast.com/tresmarta/aboutHernhag.seBorspsykologen.seSternersforlag.se Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Last year, Elon Musk's xAI set up its "Colossus" supercomputer in an old Electrolux manufacturing facility in Memphis, Tennessee. Now, the residents of nearby neighborhoods are pushing for facts and fair treatment as the company looks to expand its footprint amid questions about its environmental impact. Justin Hendrix considers the state of play with Dara Kerr, a reporter for The Guardian; Amber Sherman, a Memphis activist; and artifacts from local media reporting over the past year.

Japp, du läste rätt – den här veckan svarar vi även på en bonusfråga, och det är inte vilken fråga som helst. Hur gör man egentligen för att få till de där små beteendeförändringarna som ger stor effekt för en själv och andra? Och visste du att minimala ändringar i hur vi tvättar kan göra dramatisk skillnad till det bättre? I betalt samarbete med Electrolux. Vill du slippa reklamen? Prenumerera på Dumma Människor för 19 kr/månaden (ink moms). https://plus.acast.com/s/dummamanniskor. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

As notícias de hoje, que estão com os tempos marcados aqui embaixo são: Receita revela novo app para declarar o Imposto de Renda 2025, Lua de sangue: eclipse lunar total será visível no Brasil em março, Google se desculpa por falha no Chromecast e promete solução, WhatsApp vai ganhar novidade importante para organizar mensagens e Microsoft corrige 6 falhas 'dia zero' exploradas por criminosos no Windows.

Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@GenerativeAIMeetup   https://www.anthropic.com/news/the-anthropic-economic-index https://x.com/xai/status/1891699715298730482 - Grok 3 http://x.com/karpathy/status/1891720635363254772 https://news.microsoft.com/source/features/innovation/microsofts-majorana-1-chip-carves-new-path-for-quantum-computing/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Majorana_fermion https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=88vEsL5tgDI Grok 3 -Elon Musk new model - Seems to be a very brute-force approach (which is working) - Definitely a state of the art model - 40 dollars a month now - https://techcrunch.com/2025/02/19/x-doubles-its-premium-plan-prices-after-xai-releases-grok-3/ - 100,000 GPUs Majorana - Uses a particle called the Majorana - https://www.howtopronounce.com/ettore-majorana - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ettore_Majorana - Ettore Majorana disappeared soon after theorizing this particle in 1937 he disappeared in 1938 although thought to be alive - A majorana is a fermion that has its own antiparticle - this was originally theorized in 1937 - The particle has its own charge... and own antiparticle - it has a new topological state... which is a new state of matter - Has has 8 quibits - Is designed to scale to a million quibits - To break bitcoin you might need ~1500 to 5000 logical quibits - A quibit can be used to represent potentially infinite states Figure AI - Helix - https://www.figure.ai/news/helix - Vision-Language-Action (VLA) - Full-upper-body control - Multi Robot collaboration - Pick up anything - Single neural network to build this, no specific fine tuning - https://www.figure.ai/news/helix - Has a slow System 2 and a fast system 1 neural network - system 2 -- 7B - system 1 -- 80M   Get ready to explore the frontiers of technology in this exciting episode! We unpack the latest breakthroughs driving us toward Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) and beyond, with a mix of mind-blowing advancements and thought-provoking discussions: Grok 3 Unveiled: Elon Musk's xAI has dropped Grok 3, a powerhouse AI model dominating benchmarks and redefining what large language models can achieve. We dive into its stellar performance, its bold “no-filter” approach to information, and how it stacks up against heavyweights like Claude 3.5, OpenAI's offerings, and Google's latest.   Quantum Leap Forward: Microsoft's Majorana-based quantum chip is here, promising to scale quantum computing to a million qubits. We simplify the tech behind it, explore its potential to transform everything from cryptography to drug design, and ponder what it means for simulating reality itself.   Robots in Action: Figure AI's Helix brings us two humanoid robots teaming up to tackle chores like grocery unpacking. We marvel at their teamwork, laugh at their quirky moves, and discuss the hurdles and possibilities of general-purpose robotics in our everyday lives.   But it's not all tech demos and breakthroughs. We wrestle with the big stuff too: Are we inching closer to AGI? How do quantum computing, AI, and robotics fuel each other's progress? And what happens when unrestricted AI or quantum tech shakes up ethics—like privacy or security? Perfect for AI buffs, tech pros, or anyone curious about tomorrow, this episode blends sharp insights, lively debates, and a dash of humor. Jump in to stay ahead in the fast-moving world of generative AI! Listen now and join the discussion! Chapters:   0:00 - Introduction: The AGI RevolutionOpening remarks about how close we are to AGI and the recent breakthroughs 2:15 - Grok 3: The New AI BenchmarkDiscussion of Grok 3's capabilities and performance compared to other models 7:30 - Elon's 122-Day Data CenterHow Elon Musk converted an old Electrolux factory into a massive AI data center 11:45 - The Computing Power Behind GrokDetails about the 100,000+ GPUs and diesel generators powering Grok's training 15:20 - Why Grok "Just Feels Better"Analysis of what makes Grok 3 outperform other models in real-world use cases 19:40 - AI Guardrails: Freedom vs. SafetyThe ethical debate around AI content restrictions and guardrails 25:15 - The Cat and Mouse Game of AI SafetyHow users bypass AI safety measures and what it means for regulation 30:00 - Anthropic's Economic IndexSurprising data about how people actually use AI tools in practice 36:30 - Programming: AI's Killer AppWhy coding dominates AI usage and how models excel at verifiable tasks 42:15 - The $40 AI RevolutionGrok's pricing strategy and why it's disrupting the AI market 47:00 - Microsoft's Quantum Computing BreakthroughThe Majorana One and the mysterious physicist behind it 53:45 - The Path to One Million QubitsHow Microsoft plans to scale quantum computing in the next few years 58:30 - The Future of AI: Multiple Paths to AGIConcluding thoughts on how different technologies are converging toward AGI 1:02:15 - Final Thoughts: Tuesday Will Be InterestingClosing remarks on the rapid pace of AI development  

Så blir du en tvättexpert - steg för steg! Från att sortera och dosera rätt till varför 30 grader RÄCKER - Presenteras i stolt samarbete med Electrolux! Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Avalancha de resultados en Europa: Deutsche Bank, STMicroelectronics, Sanofi, Generali, KPN, Shell, ABB, Nokia, H&M y Electrolux. Con Xavier Brun, responsable de RV europea de Trea AM.

"...if we could put people in the water and teach them to surf, we'd actually have to force them to suck at something again...In business, you don't teach people to fail because failure is not an option. But our best learnings come from failure..." Chapters: 00:00 Introduction to Brian Formato and Groove Management 06:31 Innovative Learning Approaches in Leadership Development 15:01 Feedback and Impact of Leader Surf Program 20:54 Patience and Intensity in Leadership 27:04 Finding Your Groove 35:27 Rapid Fire Insights Episode Summary: In this conversation, Shannon Cassidy interviews Brian Formato, founder of Groove Management and creator of Leader Surf. Brian shares his journey from a challenging corporate career to establishing a unique leadership development program that combines surfing with personal growth. He emphasizes the importance of selfless leadership, the need for innovative learning approaches, and the impact of generosity in creating a ripple effect in leadership. The discussion also explores the parallels between surfing and leadership, highlighting the significance of patience, intensity, and celebrating success. In this conversation, Brian Formato discusses the significance of creating a culture of generosity within leadership and organizations. He emphasizes the importance of feedback, self-awareness, and the impact of small gestures in leadership. The discussion also touches on the value of time as a resource and how it can be used to foster relationships and personal growth. Brian shares personal anecdotes and insights on thriving in both personal and professional life, culminating in a rapid-fire segment that reveals his thoughts on various topics. R.O.G. Takeaway Tips: Groove Management focuses on what's right rather than what's wrong. Generosity in leadership creates a ripple effect that benefits others. Patience and intensity are crucial traits for effective leaders. Celebrating successes is vital for team morale and motivation. Learning to fail gracefully is an important part of growth. Finding one's groove is a personal and professional journey.   Creating a culture of generosity starts with intentionality. Time is a valuable resource that should be invested in others. Vulnerability in leadership is a strength, not a weakness. Investing in relationships is key to living a fulfilling life. Guest Bio: Brian Formato is the founder of Groove Management, an executive coaching, strategic planning and human capital consulting firm, and the creator of LeaderSurf, an adventurous development program for business leaders of all backgrounds, industries and corners of the world who want to break old habits and create lasting change. Brian has 25+ years of experience developing leaders and organizational capabilities inside of companies in a variety of industries including financial services, software, digital marketing, telecommunications, industrials, construction equipment and publishing as well as non-profit organizations. He has served in diverse roles including HR management, leadership and organizational development, corporate communications, and digital marketing. He launched Groove Management in 2014 to help first time CEOs step into new and uncharted waters inherent with their unique roles. He is known for his work with executive teams, taking them outside of their four walls to address tough business challenges, and create new experiences that build trust and prompt change. His practice offers executive coaching, leadership effectiveness and development, organizational development, behavior-based leader branding, and alignment during change (early change company growth, post-merger integration and venture capital) services. Brian pairs appreciative inquiry with a balanced leadership approach rooted in science, service and self to help leaders find their groove, learn to fail in order to succeed and adopt leadership practices centered on service to others and oneself. He often “sees the simple” that we can't see when we are too close, and turns the simple into actionable insights with questions like “Would I thrive working for me?” Brian coaches senior leaders and CEOs in a wide range of companies and industries. Coaching client organizations include Starbucks, Workday, Circle K, Electrolux, Propel, Toast, VisLink, Reltio, Databricks and several others. Brian earned a bachelor's degree in business administration from Eckerd College and a master's in organization development from American University. He is certified in REACH Quotient, Myers Briggs, Birkmann, TKI, Conflict Dynamics Profile, and Brand You. Resources: GrooveManagement.com www.leadersurf.com Where to find R.O.G. Podcast: R.O.G on YouTube R.O.G on Apple Podcasts R.O.G on Spotify How diverse is your network?  N.D.I. Network Diversity Index What is your Generosity Style?  Generosity Quiz Credits: Brian Formato, Sheep Jam Productions, Host Shannon Cassidy, Bridge Between, Inc. Coming Next: Please join us next week, Episode 213, Host, Shannon Cassidy.

Nell'ultimo triennio insieme all'occupazione è cresciuta la povertà assoluta. Rispetto al prepandemia, ovvero al 2019, nel 2023 l'occupazione è aumentata di 1 milione e 262mila unità di lavoro (+5,4%), raggiungendo il picco. I contributi più rilevanti sono venuti da servizi (+ 65%) e costruzioni (+29%), settori che più hanno contribuito alla ripresa dell'economia.Però, a fronte di questo andamento positivo del mercato del lavoro, le retribuzioni reali per occupato sono rimaste sotto i livelli pre-crisi e sono aumentati gli individui in povertà assoluta, passati dal 7,6% del 2019 al 9,7% del 2023. Sono, invece, diminuiti i working poor per la minor incidenza del part time involontario.È questo il quadro tracciato dal Monitor "L'occupazione aumenta, ma aumenta anche la povertà", realizzato da Area Studi Legacoop e Prometeia, che si focalizza sul periodo 2019-2023.Il commento di Mattia Granata, Direttore Area Studi Legacoop a Focus Economia.Beko chiude le fabbriche, la maledizione del settore del biancoDopo le chiusure di Merloni, Ariston, Indesit e Whirlpool, ora tocca a Beko. E la "maledizione del settore del bianco" si arricchisce di un nuovo capitolo. Una volta fiore all'occhiello dell'industria italiana con i marchi Merloni, Indesit, Ariston, da decenni è finito nelle mani di multinazionali estere - ci sono anche gli svedesi Electrolux - che delocalizzano dove il costo del lavoro è minore.Beko Europe ha presentato un "piano industriale" che prevede entro il prossimo anno e comporterà 1.935 esuberi. L'annuncio arriva dopo 12 anni di cassa integrazione tra ex Whirlpool e Beko Europe.Il marchio controllato dai turci di Arçelik, che solo da pochi mesi aveva acquisito cinque stabilimenti italiani da Whirlpool (non quello di Napoli, chiuso tre anni fa e demoralizzato in Polonia), ha proposto la chiusura degli stabilimenti di Siena (299 dipendenti che producono congelatori), di Comunanza in provincia di Ascoli Piceno (320 dipendenti che fanno lavatrici) e il ridimensionamento di uno dei tre poli produttivi di Cassinetta, Varese (940 dipendenti per la produzione di frigoriferi, il piano prevede il taglio di 540 posti). In più il taglio di 678 'colletti bianchi', quasi la metà dei 1.500 amministrativi e dirigenti di Beko Europe in Italia, oltre a 60 posti di lavoro cancellati a Melano, vicino Fabriano, e 40 a Carinaro, provincia di Caserta.Dalla multinazionale spiegano che lo scenario per il settore è difficile e che il piano è una soluzione concreta per l'Italia. Sono infatti previsti oltre 110 milioni di euro di investimenti e la ricerca di possibili reindustrializzazioni per Siena e Comunanza.L'intervento di Paolo Bricco de il Sole 24 Ore ai microfoni di Sebastiano Barisoni. A Parigi vertice Confindustrie per rilancio competitività UeUn incontro di ''maggiore importanza in un momento in cui l'Europa deve fronteggiare le sfide strategiche in materia di competitività'' al livello mondiale. E' questo l'intento del Forum economico trilaterale Francia-Germania-Italia, in corso oggi a Parigi e che durerà fino a domani, secondo quanto annunciato dal Medef, equivalente transalpino della Confinsutria. ''All'alba della nuova legislatura europea - sottolinea il Medef in una nota diffusa qualche giorno fa- è essenziale rafforzare il nostro mercato interno, finanziare la triplice transizione verde, digitale e demografica, risposizionando nel contempo l'Unione europea sulla scena internazionale".Il presidente del Medef, Patrick Martin,riceve gli omologhi del BDI tedesco, Tanja Gönner, e della Confindustria, Emanuele Orsini, oltre che figure di spicco della politica continentale: dal premier francese, Michel Barnier, al vicepresidente del consiglio, Antonio Tajani, fino alla presidente dell'Europarlamento, Roberta Metsola.Il racconto di Nicoletta Picchio - Il Sole 24 Ore.

Nyheter och fördjupning från Sverige och världen. Lyssna på alla avsnitt i Sveriges Radio Play.

Derren was a senior policy manager at the Personal Data Protection Commission, Regional data protection director is his current position. At Underwater World, the pink dolphins he would feed, Now he solves Electrolux's privacy needs!

What is the key to sustaining a 175-year legacy in business? How do you adapt to dramatic technological changes over generations? In this episode, Nicolai sits down with Marcus Wallenberg, Chair of SEB and Vice Chair of Investor AB, to delve into the remarkable history and enduring influence of the Wallenberg family. Since 1850, the Wallenberg dynasty has played a pivotal role in shaping Swedish industry, with stakes in global giants like Ericsson, Atlas Copco, and Electrolux. Marcus shares insights on the importance of adaptability, the family`s unique approach to long-term stewardship, and the values that have guided them throughgenerations. Discover how the Wallenberg foundations are driving innovation through cutting-edge research and education and learn about the challenges and opportunities in modern corporate governance. This episode is a deep dive into the principles of leadership, the power of a strong network, and the future of Swedish innovation. Tune in!The production team for this episode includes PLAN-Bs Pål Huuse and Niklas Figenschau Johansen. Background research was conducted by Isabelle Karlsson and Eirik Omre.Watch the episode on YouTube: Norges Bank Investment Management - YouTubeWant to learn more about the fund? The fund | Norges Bank Investment Management (nbim.no)Follow Nicolai Tangen on LinkedIn: Nicolai Tangen | LinkedInFollow NBIM on LinkedIn: Norges Bank Investment Management: Administrator for bedriftsside | LinkedInFollow NBIM on Instagram: Explore Norges Bank Investment Management on Instagram Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this episode of No Hacks podcast, we explore the concepts of fear, courage, and leadership with Luiza de Lange, a prominent figure in digital experimentation and CRO at LeoVegas. Luiza recounts her incredible journey of building in-house teams at major firms like Electrolux and Tele2 and working with a diverse array of clients at the award-winning agency, PrecisDigital.Luiza discusses the importance of vulnerability in leadership, especially as a woman in a male-dominated industry like data analytics. She shares her experiences of making bold career transitions, traveling to 45 countries, and living in six, all driven by a blend of fear and courage. Luiza emphasizes the value of mentors and a supportive network, advocating for diversity and inclusion in the workplace.Additionally, we explore how Luiza fosters a culture of experimentation, encouraging her teams to embrace failure as a learning opportunity. She shares tactics for motivating teams and ensuring everyone feels included and valued.On a personal level, we talk about how an experimenter's mindset is applied outside of work, whether it's learning a new language, tackling fears like the fear of flying, or even engaging in activities such as gaming. Luiza's insights on leadership, self-awareness, and personal growth offer a compelling and inspiring message for anyone looking to overcome their fears and lead with courage.Join us as we unpack Luiza's powerful message about leveraging fear and courage in both professional and personal realms, offering key takeaways that resonate beyond the workplace.Experimentation Elite is on December 10th in London, get your ticket at experimentationelite.com and use code NOHACKS10 to save 10%00:00 Welcome to No Hacks Podcast00:45 Meet Luiza de Lange01:13 Experimentation Elite02:05 Luiza's Journey and Career Transitions04:43 Embracing Fear and Courage06:37 Mentorship and Networking08:04 Fostering a Culture of Experimentation12:38 Leadership Insights and Diversity17:13 Applying Experimentation Mindset to Life19:50 Travel and Personal Growth24:48 Overcoming Fear of Flying30:46 Final Thoughts and Takeaways---If you enjoyed the episode, please share it with a friend!No Hacks websiteYouTubeLinkedInInstagramX

On this Live Greatly podcast episode, Kristel Bauer sits down with Willie Pietersen, author of  Leadership—The Inside Story: Time-Tested Prescriptions for Those Who Seek To Lead. Willie shares stories, experiences and the secret sauce of leadership learned from his time being CEO of multibillion-dollar businesses, a professor at Columbia University's Graduate School of Business, and a consultant to some of the world's biggest and best-known organizations.  Tune in now! Key Takeaways From This Episode How leadership is all about people Some big lessons Willie learned amid his leadership journey How to get better at receving feedback and why it is important Stories about what makes a great leader About Willie Pietersen: Willie Pietersen was raised in South Africa, and received a Rhodes Scholarship to Oxford University. After practicing law, he embarked on an international business career. Over a period of twenty years he served as the CEO of multibillion-dollar businesses such as Lever Foods, Seagram USA, Tropicana and Sterling Winthrop's Consumer Health Group. In 1998, Willie was named Professor of the Practice of Management at the Columbia University Graduate School of Business. He specializes in strategy and the leadership of change, and his methods and ideas, especially Strategic Learning, are widely applied within Columbia's executive education programs, and also in numerous corporations. He has served as a teacher and advisor to many global companies, including Aviva, Bausch & Lomb, Boeing, Chubb Corp., Deloitte, DePuy, Electrolux, Ericsson, ExxonMobil, Henry Schein, Inc., Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta, Novartis, Salt River Project, SAP, UGI, United Nations Federal Credit Union and also the Girl Scouts of the USA. Willie is the author of three books and numerous articles. His latest book is Leadership—The Inside Story: Time-Tested Prescriptions for Those Who Seek to Lead. Connect with Willie: Website: https://williepietersen.com/  LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/willie-pietersen-286b149/  Get Willie's Book: https://williepietersen.com/books/leadership-the-inside-story-time-tested-prescriptions-for-those-who-seek-to-lead/  About the Host of the Live Greatly podcast, Kristel Bauer: Kristel Bauer is a corporate wellness expert, popular keynote and TEDx speaker, and the host of top-rated self-improvement podcast “Live Greatly”.  Kristel is an Integrative Medicine Fellow & Physician Assistant with clinical experience in Integrative Psychiatry, giving her a unique perspective into optimizing mental well-being and attaining a mindset for more happiness and success in the workplace and beyond. Kristel decided to leave clinical practice in 2019 when she founded her wellness platform “Live Greatly” to share her message around well-being and success on a larger scale.  With a mission to support companies and individuals on their journeys for more happiness, success, and well-being, Kristel taps into her unique background in healthcare, business, and media, to provide invaluable insights into high power habits, leadership development, mental well-being, peak performance, resilience, sales, success, wellness at work, and a modern approach to work/life balance.  Kristel is the author of Work-Life Tango: Finding Happiness, Harmony and Peak Performance Wherever You Work (John Murray Business November 19, 2024).  Kristel is a contributing writer for Entrepreneur and she is an influencer in the business and wellness space having been recognized as a Top 10 Social Media Influencer of 2021 in Forbes. A popular speaker on a variety of topics, Kristel has presented to groups at APMP, Bank of America, Commercial Metals Company, General Mills, Northwestern University, Mazda, Santander Bank and many more. She has been featured in Forbes, Forest & Bluff Magazine, Authority Magazine & Podcast Magazine, has contributed to CEOWORLD Magazine & Real Leaders Magazine, and has appeared on ABC 7 Chicago, WGN Daytime Chicago, Fox 4's WDAF-TV's Great Day KC and Ticker News. Kristel lives in the Chicago area with her husband and their 2 children.  She can be booked for speaking engagements worldwide. To Book Kristel as a speaker for your next event, click here. Website: www.livegreatly.co  Follow Kristel Bauer on: Instagram: @livegreatly_co  LinkedIn: Kristel Bauer Twitter: @livegreatly_co Facebook: @livegreatly.co Youtube: Live Greatly, Kristel Bauer To Watch Kristel Bauer's TEDx talk of Redefining Work/Life Balance in a COVID-19 World click here. Click HERE to check out Kristel's corporate wellness and leadership blog Click HERE to check out Kristel's Travel and Wellness Blog Disclaimer: The contents of this podcast are intended for informational and educational purposes only. Always seek the guidance of your physician for any recommendations specific to you or for any questions regarding your specific health, your sleep patterns changes to diet and exercise, or any medical conditions.  Always consult your physician before starting any supplements or new lifestyle programs. All information, views and statements shared on the Live Greatly podcast are purely the opinions of the authors, and are not medical advice or treatment recommendations.  They have not been evaluated by the food and drug administration.  Opinions of guests are their own and Kristel Bauer & this podcast does not endorse or accept responsibility for statements made by guests.  Neither Kristel Bauer nor this podcast takes responsibility for possible health consequences of a person or persons following the information in this educational content.  Always consult your physician for recommendations specific to you.

As we stride into Episode 264 of the "Her Empire Builder Show," we're thrilled to feature the incredible Nicole Hatherley—a dynamic global brand strategist, professional speaker, executive coach, and inspiring entrepreneur! Nicole Hatherly is obsessed with Brand Strategy and Humans! She's an award-winning global brand strategist, accredited professional speaker, executive coach, board advisor, and international awards judge with over 30 years experience creating innovative strategies for powerhouse brands like CommBank, TikTok, Foxtel, Woolworths, Electrolux, JC Penny, and Yahoo. An international keynote speaker sharing her brand and thought leadership insights, Nicole has shared the stage with visionaries such as Arianna Huffington, Seth Godin, and Brené Brown. As an Industry Fellow and adjunct instructor at the Queensland University of Technology, Nicole leads successful programs for academics and industry to activate their vital thought leadership to positively impact the world. Her in-demand work ‘branding humans' (humanely

In this episode of Flavors Unknown, I sit down with Chef Corey Siegel, the North American Corporate Executive Chef and Director of Culinary Development at Electrolux Professional. Based in Charlotte, NC, Corey is a culinary innovator who has left a remarkable imprint on the industry. Known for his unique blend of culinary mastery and passion for music, Corey shares the influences that shaped his culinary style, his experiences in prestigious culinary competitions, and how music plays a pivotal role in his creative process. Whether you're an aspiring chef or a seasoned professional, Corey's insights are sure to inspire. What you'll learn from Chef Corey Siegel Food memories from Corey Siegel's childhood – A look back at the flavors that shaped Corey's love for food. [3:21]His journey from Albany to Electrolux – How Corey's career path led him to his current role as a culinary leader. [4:10]A day in the life of the Director of Culinary Development – What it's like to lead innovation at Electrolux Professional. [4:57]The most rewarding aspect of his job – Corey discusses what he finds most fulfilling in his role. [5:46]The impact of the right equipment on culinary success – How top-tier tools help businesses thrive. [6:59]Balancing creativity and leadership – Corey reflects on missing the hands-on creativity of the kitchen. [7:49]Launching new products – Insight into Corey's process for bringing new culinary innovations to life. [9:09]Sharing creativity through social media – The challenges and rewards of connecting with an online audience. [10:04]The challenge of content creation – How Corey navigates the demands of social media. [10:44]Creating within the ‘sandbox' of delicious simplicity – Corey's approach to mastering simple yet profound culinary creations. [12:36]A recent recipe Corey Siegel is proud of – Corey shares a dish that exemplifies his culinary philosophy. [14:46]Navigating the social media landscape – Strategies Corey Siegel uses to stay relevant in a digital world. [15:40]Reflections on his competition days – Lessons from competing at the highest levels, including the Culinary Olympics. [16:46]Training with culinary legends – The big names who've influenced Corey's career. [17:37]Competing with the US Culinary Olympics team – A deep dive into his experiences and takeaways. [18:22]Music as a reset tool – How Corey uses music to unwind and refocus after intense days. [18:52]Key lessons from competition – The valuable insights Corey Siegel gained from his competitive experiences. [20:05]His culinary education at the CIA – How his time at the Culinary Institute of America shaped his career. [22:30]Apprenticing at The Greenbrier – Corey's early experiences and the path to mastery. [24:15]The road to culinary mastery – The only path to true excellence in the kitchen. [25:33]Advice for aspiring chefs – What Corey wishes every culinary student knew. [27:06]His favorite culinary destinations – The places that inspire Corey's culinary journey. [28:14]Bucket list destinations – Where Corey Siegel dreams of traveling next for food inspiration. [31:37]The influence of music on his life – How music shapes Corey's personal and professional life. [32:57]Working with a vocal coach – Corey's journey into the world of music. [35:29]Musical aspirations – Corey's dreams beyond the kitchen. [36:43]Getting in touch with Corey – How listeners can connect with Chef Corey Siegel. [39:54]Top 5 food spots in Charlotte – Corey's must-visit eateries in his hometown. [40:48]The kitchen gadget he can't live without – Corey's essential tool for culinary success. [43:25]Favorite spices and condiments – What Corey Siegel always has in his pantry. [44:43]Mastering Hollandaise variations – Tips from Corey on perfecting this classic sauce. [46:02]His top musical companion in the kitchen – The tunes that keep Corey inspired while he cooks. [47:24] I'd like to share a potential educational resource,

Environmental L.A.W.S.In this episode, Heidi Friedman, a partner in our Environmental and Product Liability Litigation practice groups and co-chair of our ESG Collaborative, hosts a one-on-one conversation with Tara Helms, Director of Sustainability North America at Electrolux Group. Tara spearheads the organization's mission to revolutionize taste, care and well-being experiences, fostering innovative approaches to more enjoyable and sustainable living. This discussion originally took place as part of our Power Huddle: Inside the Minds of ESG Gurus series. These conversations examine how company executives from various industries are actively paving the way as ESG trendsetters and championing pragmatic ESG strategies to align with business values while building a sustainability framework to advance their company's ESG goals and practices.

Brett Townsend is the Senior Vice President of Strategy at insights and analytics firm Quester. His work has helped brands such as Pepsi, Doritos, Ruffles, Walmart, Frigidaire, and Lowe's innovate through better consumer insights. We discussed all of this and more this week on the On Brand podcast. About Brett Townsend Brett Townsend is SVP of Strategy at Quester and has had a successful career of generating sizable revenue on both the corporate and agency sides of consumer insights. Brett has worked in domestic and global branding and innovation for major brands like Pepsi, Doritos, Ruffles, Walmart, Frigidaire, and Lowe's. His work has led to successful innovations, brand extensions, product improvements, and marketing campaigns worth tens of billions of dollars globally. He has led insights teams at PepsiCo, Electrolux, and Lowe's and he has worked across all major industries like FMCG, retail, food & beverage, durable goods, restaurants, and clothing. Along Quester President Tim Hoskins, Brett is co-author of the new book "Insights on the Brink: Revitalizing the Market Research and Analytics Industry." From the Show What brand has made Brett smile recently? Brett smiled on the recent success of Modelo Especial and their use of the “fighter” story to overtake Bud Light as the best-selling beer in America. Connect with Brett on LinkedIn and the Quester website. As We Wrap … Listen and subscribe at  Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Amazon/Audible, Google Play, Stitcher, TuneIn, iHeart, YouTube, and RSS. Rate and review the show—If you like what you're hearing, be sure to head over to Apple Podcasts and click the 5-star button to rate the show. And, if you have a few extra seconds, write a couple of sentences and submit a review to help others find the show. Did you hear something you liked on this episode or another? Do you have a question you'd like our guests to answer? Let me know on Twitter using the hashtag #OnBrandPodcast and you may just hear your thoughts here on the show. On Brand is a part of the Marketing Podcast Network. Until next week, I'll see you on the Internet! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In a session from Future of Field Service Live in Cologne, Germany, host Sarah Nicastro talks with Jelle Coppens, Product Domain Expert of Service and Repair at Electrolux, about how the company is working smarter to maximize the impact of its workforce. Jelle has been with Electrolux for six years, starting as a resource planner for Electrolux Belgium and quickly becoming involved in the company's digital transformation. His expertise led him to join a project enhancing technical solutions across Belgium, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, and Denmark. If you enjoyed this episode, make sure to subscribe, rate, and review on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and Google Podcasts. Also, subscribe to our newsletter right here: https://www.futureoffieldservice.com/the-insider

Today's guest is known as "The Rapid Growth Guy." With a track record of overseeing five multimillion-dollar business success stories by the age of 30, he has earned accolades such as being named a Top 30 Sales Professional by Global Gurus and being recognized as the 2023 Sales Kickoff Speaker of the Year by Selling Power Magazine. He is also the founder of Introvertu.com and the bestselling author of The Introvert's Edge book series, which includes titles like "The Introvert's Edge to Networking: Work the Room. Leverage Social Media. Develop Powerful Connections." His books have sold over 100,000 copies and been translated into 15 languages. In addition to his literary success, he is the charismatic host of The Introvert's Edge Podcast and the Better Business Coach® Podcast, where he shares invaluable insights and strategies for business success. His expertise and insights have transformed thousands of struggling or plateaued small businesses, propelling them into momentum and growth. From working with major companies like Electrolux, Oracle, and Microsoft to launching the Small Business Festival, ranked as a Top-3 business conference by Inc., he is committed to sharing his Rapid Growth System with entrepreneurs and business owners worldwide. Please join me in welcoming Matthew Pollard.  Would you leave an honest rating and review on Apple Podcast? They are extremely helpful, and I read each and every one of them. Thanks for the inspiration!   Join us on On the Schmooze as Robbie Samuels interviews Matthew Pollard, the "rapid growth guy," in an insightful conversation about overcoming challenges, networking strategies, and achieving authentic leadership. In this episode, we discuss:

In this solo episode of the Unscripted Podcast, host Sarah Nicastro recaps the Future of Field Service Live event in Cologne, Germany, highlighting key insights from experts at Rolls Royce Power Systems, TOMRA Recycling, Thermo Fisher Scientific, and Electrolux on industry innovation, strategic vision, talent diversity, and service transformation. The conference emphasized the importance of attracting and retaining talent while maximizing existing resources to drive efficiency and innovation in the field service industry. Sarah Nicastro is the creator of Future of Field Service and VP, Customer Engagement at IFS. After completing her bachelor's degree in psychology and then her MBA, Sarah intended to get into the non-profit sector, but life had other plans. She began her career in the media with Field Technologies magazine never even having heard the term “field service.” Expecting to grow bored quickly, she was surprised to fall in love with the layers of evolution and innovation that have kept things interesting for all these years. If you enjoyed this episode, make sure to subscribe, rate, and review on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and Google Podcasts. Also, subscribe to our newsletter right here: https://www.futureoffieldservice.com/the-insider/  --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/future-of-field-service/message

This is Zack Fuss. Today we are breaking down Lifco, a Swedish conglomerate recognized amongst a group of notable Scandinavian serial acquirers. Lifco's business focus is to acquire and develop market-leading niche companies that run independently and are largely self-funded business units. Carl Bennet, the current chairman, is the architect behind Lifco and was the former CEO of the famed Electrolux in the 1980s. After acquiring a business out of Electrolux with a friend, Carl formed the group that is now today's Lifco. The roots of the business are in the medical sector, specifically dental, but have since grown into a diversified conglomerate as an acquirer of dental instruments, demolition equipment, and a wide array of specialized industrial businesses.  I'm joined by Adnan Hadziefendic, a portfolio manager at REQ Capital. We discuss the company's clear philosophy centered on constant long-term growth, a focus on profitability, and an intentionally decentralized organization. Please enjoy this breakdown of Lifco.  Register for the Business Breakdowns x Founders Conference. For the full show notes, transcript, and links to the best content to learn more, check out the episode page here. ----- This episode is brought to you by Public: Invest in stocks, bonds, options, crypto, and more in one place. A High-Yield Cash Account is a secondary brokerage account with Public Investing, member FINRA/SIPC. Funds from this account are automatically deposited into partner banks where they earn a variable interest and are eligible for FDIC insurance. Neither Public Investing nor any of its affiliates is a bank. US only. Learn more at public.com/disclosures/high-yield-account. ----- Business Breakdowns is a property of Colossus, LLC. For more episodes of Business Breakdowns, visit joincolossus.com/episodes. Follow us on Twitter: @JoinColossus | @ReustleMatt | @domcooke | @zbfuss  Editing and post-production work for this episode was provided by The Podcast Consultant (https://thepodcastconsultant.com). Show Notes (00:00:00) Welcome to Business Breakdowns  (00:05:27) Lifco's Business Model and History (00:06:29) Core Segments of Lifco's Business and Acquisition Strategy (00:07:14) Carl Bennett's Role and Lifco's Evolution (00:09:53) Lifco's Turnaround and Expanding Outside of Dental (00:13:47) M&A Strategy and Integration (00:16:53) Lifco Playbook for Post-Acquisition (00:22:41) Decentralization as Paramount to the Lifco Culture  (00:28:02) Aligning Incentives Across Acquisitions (00:34:31) The Recent Leadership Transition (00:38:56) Lifco's Capital Allocation Strategy (00:41:10) System Solutions and Future Growth (00:47:37) Lessons from Breaking Down Lifco's

Nuestra invitada en el episodio #262 es Ana Vernaza, una líder y ejecutiva con más de 25 años de experiencia en diversos sectores, y quien actualmente es la gerente general de la empresa sueca Electrolux en la región andina.Su capacidad para construir y guiar equipos efectivos, junto con su pensamiento estratégico, la ha llevado a sobresalir en empresas multinacionales de distintos sectores. Ana ha ganado reconocimiento por su integridad, innovación y enfoque en obtener resultados.Al unirse a Electrolux en 2021, Ana encontró una cultura corporativa que resonaba con sus valores fundamentales. En esta empresa sueca, el empoderamiento femenino, la diversidad y el cuidado por las personas son ejes centrales. Acompáñame a descubrir la inspiradora historia de Ana Vernaza.

News with Sean 5-20-2024 …Scary Recall for Electrolux Stoves

In today's episode, we have the privilege of hosting the one and only Matthew Pollard, a distinguished figure in the realm of sales and entrepreneurship. Matthew is widely recognized as "The Rapid Growth Guy" and is a Top 50 Keynote Speaker for 2020, according to Top Sales World Magazine.   Forbes has dubbed Matthew as "the real deal," and by the age of 30, he had already achieved the remarkable feat of spearheading five multi-million dollar business success stories. With a wealth of experience and insights, Matthew has worked with industry giants like Electrolux, Oracle, and Microsoft, delivering impactful training, keynotes, and workshops across the globe.   In this episode, Matthew shares his expertise on a topic that resonates with many - "Sales and Networking Secrets for Introverted Entrepreneurs." Despite being an introvert himself, Matthew has not only embraced his introversion but has also turned it into a strength. His bestselling book, "The Introvert's Edge," endorsed by Harvard, Princeton, Neil Patel, and over 50 global leaders, stands as a guide for introverted entrepreneurs looking to navigate the world of sales with confidence.   Matthew's journey extends beyond the stage and into the heart of small businesses. He has successfully transformed struggling or plateaued enterprises into beacons of growth. As the founder of the Small Business Festival, ranked as a Top-3 business conference by Inc, Matthew is dedicated to providing invaluable resources and events to empower entrepreneurs nationwide.   Join us as we uncover the secrets to sales success and effective networking for introverted entrepreneurs. Matthew Pollard's insights are sure to inspire and equip you with practical strategies to propel your business forward. Don't miss out on this opportunity to learn from "The Rapid Growth Guy" himself! Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this podcast are those of the host and guest and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any organization. Book your 15 minute FREE consultation here: https://calendly.com/trentclark Ready to take your game to the next level? Join the NIL movement and discover a world of new opportunities!   https://www.aim4nil.com/ Be sure to subscribe to our podcast for more inspiring interviews and valuable insights. If you enjoyed this episode, please leave us a review and share it with your network. Together, we can unlock success!   Connect with Coach Trent Clark: Trent@leadershipity.com Connect with  Matthew Pollard Website LinkedIn Leadershipity Social Links:   Youtube LinkedIn Instagram Fb Page