Podcasts about Revocation

The fraudulent claims amounted to approximately 7 million yen in total, disbursed across 17 municipalities in four prefectures: Ibaraki, Chiba, Saitama, and Tokyo. The respective local governments will demand the return of approximately 9.8 million yen, which includes surcharge penalties. This marks the fifth time since July 2025 that Ibaraki prefecture has revoked a facility's designation due to fraudulent benefit claims and document forgery. Episode notes: ‘Ibaraki Prefecture Announces Revocation of Welfare Facility's License Over 7 Million Yen Fraudulent Benefit Claims': https://barrierfreejapan.com/2026/05/18/ibaraki-prefecture-announces-revocation-of-welfare-facilitys-license-over-7-million-yen-fraudulent-benefit-claims/

The "grace period" for unpaid child support is officially over. In this episode of Chaos Culture Radio, we're breaking down the State Department's massive enforcement pivot that began on May 8, 2026. If you owe more than $2,500 in past-due child support, your valid U.S. passport is now subject to immediate revocation—even if you aren't currently traveling or applying for a renewal.In this episode, we discuss:The "Proactive" Shift: Moving from "renewal denial" to active revocation. Why the government is now hunting down existing passport holders in the HHS database.The $100K Founders Club: Breaking down the first wave of revocations targeting the roughly 2,700 people who owe over $100,000, and the timeline for the expansion to the $2,500 threshold.The Notification Process: How you'll be notified (hint: it's via the email or mail on your last application) and why you shouldn't ignore that "Notice of Revocation."The "Abroad" Nightmare: What to do if your passport is yanked while you're outside the U.S. (The answer involves emergency one-way travel documents and a trip to the Embassy).The Road to Reinstatement: Why paying the debt doesn't mean you get your old passport back. We explain the 2–3 week "clearing" process and why you'll have to apply—and pay—for a brand-new book.Legal Recourse: Can you fight it? We look at administrative reviews and payment plans that might save your ability to travel.Key Fact: Once a passport is revoked, it is dead. Even after you pay your arrears to $0, that specific document can never be used for travel again.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/chaos-culture-radio--3078307/support.Follow Chaos Culture Radio for real conversations that move culture forward.New episodes every week.Share this episode with someone who needs to hear it.

Story of the Week (DR):Apple names John Ternus as CEO to replace Tim Cook, who will become chairmanApple CEO Tim Cook is stepping downMeet John Ternus, the 51-year-old former swimming champ who will succeed Tim Cook as Apple CEOTim Cook to step down as Apple CEO. In letter, describes 15 years of emailsTim Cook's exit is part of a CEO reckoning sweeping Corporate AmericaAre internal CEOs the way to go?Best Buy taps insider Jason Bonfig as new CEO, Corie Barry steps downShe's actually leaving the boardLululemon names former Nike exec Heidi O'Neill as CEO MMLululemon CEO Pick Heidi O'Neill Faces Skeptical Wall Street AND Lululemon shares dive on new CEO pick — as investors fear she may not have chops to save struggling companyO'Neill brings more than 30 years of experience in performance apparel, footwear, and sports, including over 25 years at Nike, where she was credited with transforming their women's business from a side-project into a global juggernaut. Her leadership spanned product creation, brand strategy, marketing, and global operations, making her one of the most influential executives in the company's modern era. Most recently, she served as President, Consumer, Product & Brand, overseeing Nike's global consumer and product engineGolden hello: $7M equity, $2M cashRoughly 75% of Lululemon's customers are womenLululemon board: 7 of 11 FChair Martha MorfittCommittees:Audit: 2 of 3 F, including chairNomination: 3 of 5Pay: 3 of 5 F, including chairAlso: CFO, Chief Merchandising Officer, Chief People & Culture Officer, Chief Legal and Compliance Officer, Chief Brand & Product Activation OfficerNow we get why Chip is so mad: Chip Wilson, Lululemon's founder, largest shareholder and chief agitator, has not weighed in on the pick yet, although he previously advocated for waiting to name a new CEO until the board could be resetBest Buy taps insider Jason Bonfig as new CEO, Corie Barry steps downBest Buy taps insider Bonfig to succeed veteran Barry as CEO amid demand slowdownOil giant BP suffers shareholder revolt over climate transparency at tense AGM“BP suffered a shareholder revolt at its AGM over the election of a new chair and resolutions that included dropping some climate disclosure obligations”BP failed to get majority shareholder approval on two highly anticipated motions, which would have permitted online-only AGMs and retired two company-specific climate disclosure obligations. Each resolution received around 47% support, far short of the required 75% required to pass.Ahead of the AGM, BP's board blocked a motion tabled by Follow This that would have required the company to share plans on creating value for shareholders under future scenarios of falling oil and gas demand.Resolution 1: Annual Report and Accounts – 98% For / 2% AgainstResolution 2: Directors' remuneration report – 95% For / 5% AgainstResolution 3: Directors' remuneration policy – 95% For / 5% AgainstResolution 4: To elect Albert Manifold as a director – 82% For / 18% AgainstSome activist investors had said even a 5% vote against Manifold, who has only been in post as chair since October, would represent a severe reprimand, particularly after a historic 24% vote against outgoing chair Helge Lund last year.Resolution 5: To elect Meg O'Neill as a director – 97% For / 3% AgainstResolution 6: To re-elect Kate Thomson as a director – 96% For / 4% AgainstResolution 7: To re-elect Dame Amanda Blanc as a director – 95% For / 5% AgainstResolution 8: To re-elect Tushar Morzaria as a director – 96% For / 4% AgainstResolution 9: To re-elect Ian Tyler as a director – 96% For / 4% AgainstResolution 10: To re-elect Satish Pai as a director – 92% For / 8% AgainstResolution 11: To re-elect Dr Johannes Teyssen as a director – 89% For / 11% AgainstResolution 12: To re-elect Hina Nagarajan as a director – 96% For / 4% AgainstResolution 13: To elect Dave Hager as a director – 97% For / 3% AgainstResolution 14: Reappointment of auditor – 100% For / 0% AgainstResolution 15: Remuneration of auditor – 100% For / 0% AgainstResolution 16: Political donations and political expenditure – 98% For / 2% AgainstResolution 17: Directors' authority to allot shares – 96% For / 4% AgainstResolution 18: Special resolution: Authority for disapplication of pre-emption rights – 99% For / 1% AgainstResolution 19: Special resolution: Additional authority for disapplication of pre-emption rights – 99% For / 1% AgainstResolution 20: Special resolution: Share buyback – 100% For / 0% AgainstResolution 21: Special resolution: Notice of general meetings – 94% For / 6% AgainstResolution 22: Special resolution: New Articles of Association – 47% For / 53% AgainstResolution 23: Special resolution: Revocation of previous 2015 and 2019 resolutions – 47% For / 53% AgainstResolution 24: Special resolution: ACCR shareholder resolution – 26% For / 74% AgainstNetflix authorizes $25 billion share buyback after stock dropPopulist Math Time:Employees: As of 2026, Netflix employs roughly 16,000 people. If you took that $25 billion and distributed it directly to the workforce = $1,562,500 per employeeAlternatively: They could fund a $100,000 annual salary for 250,000 new people for an entire year.Customers: Netflix has roughly 325 million subscribers globally. If they decided to use that money to subsidize the service instead of buying back stock: $77 per person.Netflix could give every subscriber on the planet roughly 4 to 5 months of service for free.Or, they could lower the price of every subscription by about $6.40 per month for a full year.Social impact:Various estimates (including from HUD) suggest that ending homelessness in the US would cost roughly $20 billion to $30 billion.It could provide a full four-year scholarship (at an average cost of $100k total) to 250,000 students.It could fund the eradication of several neglected tropical diseases or provide clean water infrastructure for tens of millions of people globally.For perspective, the entire annual budget for NASA in 2025 was around $25 billion. Netflix is essentially spending one "National Space Program" worth of cash just to tweak its stock price.Shareholders:If Netflix successfully retires that 6.4% of shares and the market maintains its current valuation, the stock price should mathematically rise by about 7% to compensate for the reduced supply.If the price jumps 7% (from $93 to roughly $99.50), here is the wealth jump:Vanguard: $2.5BBlackRock: $2.1BFidelity: $1.4BReed Hastings: $138MGoodliest of the Week (MM/DR):DR: Lufthansa Cuts 20,000 Flights to Save Fuel Amid Iran War Price SurgeMM: The Onion Says It Has Again Struck a Deal to Take Over InfowarsMM: Texas Capital stays incorporated in Delaware after shareholders reject 'Dexit' voteAre investors waking up??? They rejected TEXAS CAPITAL redomestication to TEXAS!Assholiest of the Week (MM):White guy victimhood DR‘The disfavored groups, No. 1, obviously, would be white males': Ron DeSantis is still signing anti-DEI legislationWhite males are…70% of governors70% of congress60% of US corporate boards31% of US populationWhat percentage of DEI programs for companies were designed by white male CEOs? 90% of CEOs in Fortune 500 are white guys - so ALL OF THEMSo when we read: White House study says DEI policies cost US economy by promoting unqualified managers…Even if the premise and math and methodology and concepts are literally all make believe, we SHOULD take away that “white men pretending to do DEI are bad for the economy” right?Federal Job Cuts Hit Black Women Hard—a Year Later, Unemployment Is UpDonald Trump 'Honours' UGA Women's Tennis Champions With Bizarre Photo Featuring Only Men In The ForegroundThe anti DEI, white male victimhood movement should entirely OWN DEI itself - this is the great blame transfer - somehow manage to blame black women and gays for the fact that white men running the world instituted shitty policies not meant to distribute equal opportunity, just meant for press releases - anti DEI is actually anti white male leaders. Make every company CEO a black woman and then see what DEI looks likeWhite guy manifestosPalantir published a mini manifesto calling some cultures ‘harmful' and ‘middling' and said Silicon Valley has ‘a moral debt' to the U.S.Why are tech bros so insistent we listen to everything they think? Were you not listened to as a child? Did no one ever validate you? Is this just about sex? Could you not get laid, and now because you have money you need to get everything you ever thought off your chest?Here are snippets of what Alex Karp, man who couldn't get laid, thought so important that we know:The postwar neutering of Germany and Japan must be undone.The culture almost snickers at Musk's interest in grand narrative, as if billionaires ought to simply stay in their lane of enriching themselves . . . . Any curiosity or genuine interest in the value of what he has created is essentially dismissed, or perhaps lurks from beneath a thinly veiled scorn.The ruthless exposure of the private lives of public figures drives far too much talent away from government service.Man who exposes private lives as a business model says it's badWe, in America and more broadly the West, have for the past half century resisted defining national cultures in the name of inclusivity.All very important points from a man we should clearly listen to about everything - the lane I want you to stay in is “shut the fuck up” lane where, BECAUSE you have billions, I'm not forced to listen to you as if you matterWhite guy philanthropyJeff Bezos and Lauren Sánchez Bezos Donate $34 Million in Fashion GrantsMacKenzie Scott's latest donation takes her HBCU giving to well over $1 billionMacKenzie Scott has donated more than $26 billion—but it's barely made a dent in her net worth because of the power of Amazon sharesHeadliniest of the WeekDR: The blowhards:Sam Altman opens up about the Molotov cocktail attack on his home: 'The way Anthropic talks about OpenAI doesn't help'Nvidia CEO says that AI agents will make workers busier than ever—they'll ‘harass' and ‘micromanage' you, instead of take your jobMcDonald's boss on abuse claims: 'I don't want to talk about the past'Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang says you won't lose your job to AI—you'll lose it to your coworker who uses it‘I think it's a mistake': Delta CEO Ed Bastian refuses to call it ‘artificial intelligence' because it scares peopleAI will boost productivity so ServiceNow won't have to backfill open jobs, CEO saysDR: The Nutter Chutter Butter Double: Morgan Stanley biotech banker Jessica Chutter joins Tectonic board AND Tectonic Therapeutic Appoints Jessica Chutter to Board of DirectorsI screwed up: blanked and thought that was two different companies. But then I did 3 seconds of research and found that she had joined a second board: PTC Therapeutics on March 24, 2026.MM: Apple's New CEO Needs to Be a ‘Cowboy' — But Can He With Tim Cook Still There?MM: SEC Imposes Strict Nine-Year Cap on Independent DirectorsPhillipinesWho Won the Week?DR: Jessica ChutterMM: The Philippines, whose corporate boards will no longer be allowed to have Edward Sylvester of WestAmerica Bancorp, born in 1938 and on the board for 47 yearsPredictionsDR: Nobody ever talks about Jason BonfigMM: Edward Sylvester steps down as Lead Independent Director of WestAmerica Bancorp to take the role of Non Executive Advisor to the Lead Independent Director Emeritus of WestAmerica Bancorp, says the rise of AI calls fresh blood on the board

Christopher war im Urlaub - also ist einiges aufzuarbeiten. In Abwesenheit des Co-Hosts hat die AI große und unerwartete Fortschritte bei der Suche nach Sicherheitslücken gemacht, was Sylvester an einem Beispiel im populären Editor vim nacherzählt. Der KI-Firma Anthropic ist Quellcode für Claude Code, der durch Claude Code gecoded wurde, entfleucht und offenbart allerlei humorige Details. Weniger humorig waren die Osterfeiertage für Kunden der CA D-Trust, die wegen einer fatalen Formalität ihre TLS-Zertifikate austauschen mussten. Und für dreißig Routerbesitzer in Deutschland, die durch die Behörden, allen voran Verfassungsschutz und BSI, auf die Sicherheitslücken in ihren Geräten angesprochen wurden. Und dann waren da noch zwei Forschungsaufsätze zum Thema Quantencomputer, die die Fachwelt aufscheuchen. So gibt es nun weitere Details über theoretische Durchbrüche, die den Wechsel zu quantensicheren Verfahren deutlich dringender machen. Bei Christopher ist der Ton ab und zu etwas ungleichmäßig, weil er den Kopf ein paar Mal fahrlässigerweise vom Mikro weggedreht hat. Wir bitten die Schwankungen zu entschuldigen und werden Christophers Kopf bei künftigen Aufnahmen mit technischen Mitteln fixieren.

CHRONEPSIS UNLEASHES DEBUT EP WEIGHT OF ETERNITY — OUT NOW! For fans of Arsis, The Black Dahlia Murder, and Revocation South Jersey's rising force in extreme metal, Chronepsis , has just dropped their debut EP, Weight of Eternity — a blistering, blood-soaked offering of melodic technical death metal that is equal parts chaos and precision. Formed in 2023, Chronepsis has quickly carved a name for themselves with a sound that merges the brutality of guttural vocals , ground-shaking bass , and scorching technical riffs with razor-sharp precision and dark emotional depth. Their debut EP captures the essence of despair, fury, and manic intensity—balancing melodic intricacy with unrelenting aggression. “ Weight of Eternity is our first statement to the world,” says the band. “This is everything we are. Organized chaos, technicality, intensity, and a deep dive into the darkest corners of the human mind.” Track after track delivers a pummeling yet calculated assault that's sure to resonate with fans of acts like Arsis , The Black Dahlia Murder , and Revocation . The EP was written, recorded, and produced entirely by the band , showcasing their DIY ethos and uncompromising vision. It was mixed and mastered by Erik Johnson at Dark Prophet Audio , with album artwork and logo design handled by vocalist Chris Curtis . EP Credits: Eric Cuffari – Drums Torr Walker – Rhythm Guitars Chris Curtis – Vocals, Backing Vocals Mike Kelliher – Lead Guitars Gavin Miele – Bass, Backing Vocals (Live) Listen now and feel the Weight of Eternity:

The mission of the Alcohol License Review Committee is to serve City's residents, businesses & visitors by thoroughly & conscientiously reviewing license applications, establishing & maintaining standards, addressing violations, developing alcohol-related policies, & making recommendations to the Common Council.

Honeypot Session Lifetime https://isc.sans.edu/diary/DShield%20%28Cowrie%29%20Honeypot%20Stats%20and%20When%20Sessions%20Disconnect/32840 Let s Encrypt Tests Mass Revocation https://community.letsencrypt.org/t/lets-encrypt-2026-mass-revocation-simulation/245960 https://www.certkit.io/blog/ari-solves-mass-certificate-revocation https://www.certkit.io/blog/lets-encrypt-mass-revocation-simulation F5 Vulnerability Re-Classified (and already exploited) as RCE https://my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K000156741

The mission of the Alcohol License Review Committee is to serve City's residents, businesses & visitors by thoroughly & conscientiously reviewing license applications, establishing & maintaining standards, addressing violations, developing alcohol-related policies, & making recommendations to the Common Council.

Join the leadership of the Subcommittee on Human Rights and Immigration (part of the D.C. Bar International Law Community) for a timely discussion of India's Citizenship Amendment Act (the CAA), a law that expressly conditions migrants' access to citizenship rights on their religious affiliation. Implemented in March 2024, the CAA threatens the country's longstanding commitment to secularism and equality under the Indian Constitution. The law also magnifies existing tensions between religious communities through rendering certain individuals (primarily Muslims) legal and societal outsiders, or--to quote the law's architects and supporters--“infiltrators.” To date, more than 200 constitutional challenges to the law are pending before India's Supreme Court. Our guests are Aashish Yadav, a legal scholar who has published widely on citizenship and the related topic of statelessness in India, and Ankita M. Kumar, a journalist and documentary filmmaker whose short documentary, Far From Home, centers on an Afghan Muslim woman and her family who fled Afghanistan in early 2021 only to find themselves ineligible to naturalize in India or obtain resettlement in a third country. Resources: "A new immigration law reflects India's rising paranoia over the ‘undesirable outsider”', Aashish Yadav with Angshuman Choudhury (The Indian Express, 23 May 2025)"CAA will not help persecuted Hindus, Sikhs from neighbouring countries", Aashish Yadav with Mohsin Alam Bhat (The Indian Express, 22 March 2024)"On the verge: Revocation and denial of citizenship in India", Aashish Yadav with Mohsin Alam Bhat (Emilien Fargues and Iseult Honohan (eds), Revocation of Citizenship: The New Policies of Conditional Membership, EUI Working Papers) ‘Seeking Refuge: The Story of Two Women I Know', Ankita Kumar (Winner of the AFPC's Professional Excellence Award)Afghan Refugee Doc ‘Far From Home' Adds Indian Thespian Naseeruddin Shah as Executive Producer in Oscar Push (Variety) Director Ankita Kumar on new documentary 'Far From Home' (The Afghanistan Project Podcast) "The Story Behind Far From Home Will Surprise You!" (American Documentary Film Festival)  Far From Home: Shedding Light On The Unseen Lives Of Afghan Refugees In India (Outlook India)Aashish Yadav is currently pursuing a doctoral degree in Australia at the Melbourne Law School's Peter McMullin Centre on Statelessness focusing on nationality in the context of displacement caused by climate change disasters.  Aashish previously served as an Assistant Professor and Assistant Director of the Centre for Public Interest Law at the Jindal Global Law School in India, where he led India's first clinic on statelessness.  Ankita M. Kumar is an Indian-origin journalist and documentary filmmaker based in the U.S.  She is the recipient of the SF Press Club award and the Professional Excellence Award from the Association of Foreign Press Correspondents (AFPC-USA). Her first film, Far from Home, a short documentary about Afghan refugees in India, has screened at the Academy award-qualifying American Documentary and Animation Film Festival and the Tasveer Film Festival.  Ankita is the founder of Akiray Pictures, a San Francisco-based production company.  Please note, the positions and opinions expressed by the speakers are strictly their own, and do not necessarily represent the views of their employers, nor those of the D.C. Bar, its Board of Governors or co-sponsoring Communities and organizations.

A round-up of the main headlines in Sweden on March 18th 2026. You can hear more reports on our homepage www.radiosweden.se, or in the app Sveriges Radio. Presenter/producer: Kris Boswell.

A quiet revolution just reshaped estate planning in North Carolina: a properly certified, attorney‑stored electronic copy of your will can now be probated like the original. We unpack what that means in real life—fewer frantic searches for paper, fewer hearings over missing originals, and a smoother path for families when they need clarity most. With all 100 counties live on e‑courts, the shift from pen and ink to secure digital storage isn't a trend; it's the new backbone of reliable probate.We walk through the essential safeguards that make e‑wills work. A North Carolina attorney must certify that the digital file is a full and complete copy of your attested will, confirm that you authorized electronic storage, and advise you that tearing up paper no longer revokes a converted will. Revocation still belongs to you—but it now happens in writing, often via a new will that expressly revokes prior wills and codicils, or a written revocation filed alongside the stored record. This paper trail removes guesswork and helps courts honor intent without costly detours.You'll also hear how our secure “vault” system protects documents with bank‑level encryption and strict access controls, why this reduces the risk of “slip‑sheet” tampering, and how families benefit from a simple “click, click, file” experience when it's time to open probate. Have an older will? You don't need to start from scratch. Bring it to a North Carolina attorney to certify, convert, and store, so the court can rely on a secure digital copy if the original is lost or destroyed. We also touch on updating plans over time with new wills and codicils and keeping a clean history that's easy for executors to follow.Ready to future‑proof your estate plan with less stress and more certainty? Subscribe, share this episode with someone who handles family documents, and leave a review with your top question about going digital—what would give you the most peace of mind?

SBPC Metal Reviews #5:1) Dead Heat "Process of Elimination"2) Condition Critical "Degeneration Chamber"3) Death From Above "Reckoning of the Damned"4) Total Annihilation "Mountains of Madness"5) Revocation "New Gods, New Masters"(c)2026 Scatterbrain Productions.Thanks for listening!Always.

Most people underestimate how complex and strict the rules around making a will really are. Fail to follow even a tiny formal detail—signatures, witnesses, line of sight—and your loved one's final wishes could be invalidated. But what if the law's obsession with formalities is just a shield against fraud, or is it ultimately about respecting true human intent? This episode uncovers the deep tensions, surprising doctrines, and crucial frameworks that test your understanding of testamentary law—because protecting human finality isn't simple, and getting it wrong could mean your loved one's voice is lost forever.Dive into the secret inner workings of wills—what mental state is needed before signing, and how the law's low threshold for capacity surprisingly allows the elderly or mentally challenged to leave clear final wishes. You'll discover: the four essential elements of testamentary capacity, including understanding property, family, and the nature of the act—all assessed at that one critical moment of signing. We break down the innovative concept of lucid intervals, meaning even someone with mental illness can craft a valid will during moments of clarity, and clarify the key difference: capacity for a will isn't the same as for a business contract.Next, you'll explore the intricate formalities designed to safeguard your final wishes—what it means to properly sign, witness, and be in the correct physical and mental presence. We dissect the old-school line of sight rule versus the modern conscious presence test, highlighting how courts guard against identity fraud and how modern approaches recognize sensory awareness over geometry. You'll learn the significance of interested witnesses—saving beneficiaries from self-serving pitfalls—and how the law's “purging doctrine” avoids invalidating an estate just because a beneficiary signed as a witness.But formalities aren't foolproof. The episode reveals flexible doctrines like holographic Wills—handwritten, un-witnessed documents—recognized by most states for that very reason. Plus, the revolutionary harmless error doctrine: despite technical mistakes, courts now may uphold a will if clear evidence shows that the decedent truly intended it, shifting the old rigid approach. You'll understand: when formalities fail, the real question is always intent.The episode then navigates the tricky world of revocation—how wills are revoked by new documents, physical destruction, or operation of law (like divorce). We explain the importance of both act and intent, and the presumption that a lost will was destroyed with intent to revoke, a rule that can be rebutted with evidence. We examine innovative doctrines like revival—can an old will come back?—and the apex: the doctrine of dependent relative revocation (“DRR”), which treats certain mistakes as reversible if the testator's real intent was to avoid intestacy.We close with a powerful step-by-step framework: a systematic checklist to analyze any will-related problem, from mental capacity to formalities, revocations, and possible reinstatement. It's the essential roadmap for exam success—and for ensuring that your loved one's voice echoes accurately in the legal system long after they're gone.This episode is perfect for law students, estate planners, or anyone interested in how the law balances strict rules with the compassionate goal of honoring human intent. Because behind every final document is a last act of human ego—fiercely protected by a complex web of rules designed to hear you, even when you're gone. Hit play to master the essentials of wills law and ensure your estate plans stand up in court—and in the test of true human intentions.Key TopicsTestamentary capacity and intentFormalities of executing a willHolographic wills and material provisionsHarmless error doctrine and exceptionswills, testamentary capacity, formalities, revocation, holographic wills, harmless error doctrine, legal estate planning, law of wills, estate law

The respondents in these applications for leave to appeal, Mr. Walter and Mr. Gobeil, were recognized as representative plaintiffs for the class covered by a class action brought against the applicants/interveners in these applications for leave to appeal, that is, the Québec Major Junior Hockey League, now doing business as the Quebec Maritimes Junior Hockey League Inc., and the impleaded hockey teams that are members of the League. In the class action, the respondents submitted that the applicants/interveners were refusing to recognize major junior hockey players as having employee status, with the result that the players had no access to the protection provided by legislation governing working conditions. Two other similar class actions were authorized, one in Ontario against the Ontario Hockey League and one in Alberta against the Western Hockey League. In total, 4,286 major junior hockey players, including 1,702 in Quebec, are covered by the class actions. On March 31, 2020, the parties to the three class actions reached a settlement agreement. The agreement was submitted to the superior courts in each of the three provinces through a joint hearing. The superior courts rejected the agreement in October 2020 solely on the basis that the scope of the release provided for was overly broad. In June 2023, after the releases were renegotiated, all of the parties, including the respondents, signed an amendment to the initial settlement agreement in order to replace the release provisions. However, it appears that, shortly after the signing, the respondents disavowed their signature and announced that they would oppose the submission of the amended agreement for judicial approval. Despite the instructions given by the respondents, Mr. Savonitto, a member of one of the firms that are applicants/interveners in these applications for leave to appeal, nevertheless submitted the amended settlement agreement to the Superior Court judge for her approval. In response, the respondents filed notices with the Superior Court formally revoking the mandate of the law firms that are applicants/interveners in this case and announced that they were retaining the services of other lawyers. The applicant/intervener law firms opposed the notices of revocation and asked the Superior Court to determine the conditions for approving the amended settlement agreement. The Superior Court recorded the revocation of the mandate of the applicants/interveners as far as the respondents were concerned, but it confirmed that the applicants/interveners still continued to represent the members of the class covered by the class action. The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal and set aside the Superior Court's decision. Argued Date 2026-02-16 Keywords Civil procedure – Class action – Lawyer client relationship in context of class action –Lawyer's ethical obligations to client in context of class action – Protection for class members – Revocation of legal mandates given to firms by class representatives – Whether Court of Appeal erred in law in ordering that agreement to settle authorized class action be submitted to court by applicants/defendants for approval, thereby placing their lawyers in conflict of interest and in situation that compromised their ethical obligations – Whether Court of Appeal erred in ruling that lawyer who acts for plaintiffs in class action: (i) has lawyer client relationship only with class representative; (ii) does not represent class members; and (iii) has no duty to act in best interests of class where those interests conflict with instructions of class representative – Whether Court of Appeal erred in breaching its own duty to protect interests of absent members, especially where those interests conflict with interests of class representatives – Whether Court of Appeal erred in law in holding that art. 2633 of Civil Code of Québec and art. 528 of Code of Civil Procedure concerning homologation of transaction under ordinary law apply to process for approval of transaction in class action, and thus in asking defendants to submit amended settlement agreement for approval if Mr. Gobeil and Mr. Walter refused to do so – Code of Civil Procedure, CQLR, c. C 25.01, arts. 87, 528, 571, 575, 586, 589 and 590 – Code of Professional Conduct of Lawyers, CQLR, c. B 1, r. 3.1, ss. 20, 23, 71, 72 and 120. Notes (Quebec) (Civil) (By Leave) Language English Audio Disclaimers This podcast is created as a public service to promote public access and awareness of the workings of Canada's highest court. It is not affiliated with or endorsed by the Court. The original version of this hearing may be found on the Supreme Court of Canada's website. The above case summary was prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch).

The respondents in these applications for leave to appeal, Mr. Walter and Mr. Gobeil, were recognized as representative plaintiffs for the class covered by a class action brought against the applicants/interveners in these applications for leave to appeal, that is, the Québec Major Junior Hockey League, now doing business as the Quebec Maritimes Junior Hockey League Inc., and the impleaded hockey teams that are members of the League. In the class action, the respondents submitted that the applicants/interveners were refusing to recognize major junior hockey players as having employee status, with the result that the players had no access to the protection provided by legislation governing working conditions. Two other similar class actions were authorized, one in Ontario against the Ontario Hockey League and one in Alberta against the Western Hockey League. In total, 4,286 major junior hockey players, including 1,702 in Quebec, are covered by the class actions. On March 31, 2020, the parties to the three class actions reached a settlement agreement. The agreement was submitted to the superior courts in each of the three provinces through a joint hearing. The superior courts rejected the agreement in October 2020 solely on the basis that the scope of the release provided for was overly broad. In June 2023, after the releases were renegotiated, all of the parties, including the respondents, signed an amendment to the initial settlement agreement in order to replace the release provisions. However, it appears that, shortly after the signing, the respondents disavowed their signature and announced that they would oppose the submission of the amended agreement for judicial approval. Despite the instructions given by the respondents, Mr. Savonitto, a member of one of the firms that are applicants/interveners in these applications for leave to appeal, nevertheless submitted the amended settlement agreement to the Superior Court judge for her approval. In response, the respondents filed notices with the Superior Court formally revoking the mandate of the law firms that are applicants/interveners in this case and announced that they were retaining the services of other lawyers. The applicant/intervener law firms opposed the notices of revocation and asked the Superior Court to determine the conditions for approving the amended settlement agreement. The Superior Court recorded the revocation of the mandate of the applicants/interveners as far as the respondents were concerned, but it confirmed that the applicants/interveners still continued to represent the members of the class covered by the class action. The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal and set aside the Superior Court's decision. Argued Date 2026-02-16 Keywords Civil procedure – Class action – Lawyer client relationship in context of class action –Lawyer's ethical obligations to client in context of class action – Protection for class members – Revocation of legal mandates given to firms by class representatives – Whether Court of Appeal erred in law in ordering that agreement to settle authorized class action be submitted to court by applicants/defendants for approval, thereby placing their lawyers in conflict of interest and in situation that compromised their ethical obligations – Whether Court of Appeal erred in ruling that lawyer who acts for plaintiffs in class action: (i) has lawyer client relationship only with class representative; (ii) does not represent class members; and (iii) has no duty to act in best interests of class where those interests conflict with instructions of class representative – Whether Court of Appeal erred in breaching its own duty to protect interests of absent members, especially where those interests conflict with interests of class representatives – Whether Court of Appeal erred in law in holding that art. 2633 of Civil Code of Québec and art. 528 of Code of Civil Procedure concerning homologation of transaction under ordinary law apply to process for approval of transaction in class action, and thus in asking defendants to submit amended settlement agreement for approval if Mr. Gobeil and Mr. Walter refused to do so – Code of Civil Procedure, CQLR, c. C 25.01, arts. 87, 528, 571, 575, 586, 589 and 590 – Code of Professional Conduct of Lawyers, CQLR, c. B 1, r. 3.1, ss. 20, 23, 71, 72 and 120. Notes (Quebec) (Civil) (By Leave) Language Floor Audio Disclaimers This podcast is created as a public service to promote public access and awareness of the workings of Canada's highest court. It is not affiliated with or endorsed by the Court. The original version of this hearing may be found on the Supreme Court of Canada's website. The above case summary was prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch).

On this new episode of THE POLITICRAT daily podcast Omar Moore on two very important things that aren't being talked about enough: the SAVE Act (voting) and the Trump regime's plan to mass revoke your U.S. citizenship, naturalized or otherwise.WARNING: This episode contains foul language. Listener discretion is advised.Recorded February 12, 2026.READ THESE BOOKS:"One Person, No Vote", by Prof. Carol Anderson"Our Unfinished March", by Eric Holder"Racial Innocence" by Tanya Kateri HernandezNEWS STORIES:Trump regime looking to strip your citizenship especially if you are naturalized (NBC News, Feb 12, 2026)https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/immigration/trump-administration-working-expand-effort-strip-citizenship-foreign-b-rcna255427Trump regime aiming to strip more foreign-born US citizens of their citizenship (NY Times, Dec 17, 2025) https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/17/us/politics/trump-immigration-citizenship-denaturalization.htmlSUBSCRIBE: https://mooreo.substack.com - please be a paid subscriber (or a free subscriber)SUBSCRIBE: https://youtube.com/@thepoliticratpodBUY MERCH FROM THE POLITICRAT STORE: https://the-politicrat.myshopify.comBUY BLACK!Patronize Black-owned businesses on Roland Martin's Black Star Network: https://shopblackstarnetwork.comBLACK-OWNED MEDIA MATTERS: (Watch Roland Martin Unfiltered daily M-F 6-8pm Eastern)https://youtube.com/rolandsmartin

Climate experts warn of the implications of US President Donald Trump’s revocation of a landmark climate ruling that declared greenhouse gases a threat to public health. John Maytham unpacks what this means with Climate expert Professor Guy Midgley. Presenter John Maytham is an actor and author-turned-talk radio veteran and seasoned journalist. His show serves a round-up of local and international news coupled with the latest in business, sport, traffic and weather. The host’s eclectic interests mean the program often surprises the audience with intriguing book reviews and inspiring interviews profiling artists. A daily highlight is Rapid Fire, just after 5:30pm. CapeTalk fans call in, to stump the presenter with their general knowledge questions. Another firm favourite is the humorous Thursday crossing with award-winning journalist Rebecca Davis, called “Plan B”. Thank you for listening to a podcast from Afternoon Drive with John Maytham Listen live on Primedia+ weekdays from 15:00 and 18:00 (SA Time) to Afternoon Drive with John Maytham broadcast on CapeTalk https://buff.ly/NnFM3Nk For more from the show go to https://buff.ly/BSFy4Cn or find all the catch-up podcasts here https://buff.ly/n8nWt4x Subscribe to the CapeTalk Daily and Weekly Newsletters https://buff.ly/sbvVZD5 Follow us on social media: CapeTalk on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CapeTalk CapeTalk on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@capetalk CapeTalk on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ CapeTalk on X: https://x.com/CapeTalk CapeTalk on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@CapeTalk567 See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

AP's Lisa Dwyer reports California is paying a hefty fee for a delay in revoking thousands of commercial licenses.

TODAY ON THE ROBERT SCOTT BELL SH0W: CHD Petitions FDA for Revocation, Breast Milk Autism Theory, Chiropractors MAHA Backbone, Saponaria, Copper Protocol, "Experts" Defy CDC, Ty Bollinger, Medical Cult Exposed, Cancer Deaths Double by 2050, FDA Probes RSV Shot, Pet Weight-Loss Implant, and MORE! https://robertscottbell.com/chd-petitions-fda-for-revocation-breast-milk-autism-theory-chiropractors-become-backbone-of-maha-saponaria-question-about-copper-protocol-experts-defy-cdc-vote-medical-cult-exposed-cancer-death/https://boxcast.tv/view/chd-petitions-fda-breast-milk-autism-chiropractors-maha-backbone-saponaria-ty-bollinger-medical-cult-exposed---the-rsb-show-12-10-25-z5dyhc1pfiltzenffddn Purpose and Character The use of copyrighted material on the website is for non-commercial, educational purposes, and is intended to provide benefit to the public through information, critique, teaching, scholarship, or research. Nature of Copyrighted Material Weensure that the copyrighted material used is for supplementary and illustrative purposes and that it contributes significantly to the user's understanding of the content in a non-detrimental way to the commercial value of the original content. Amount and Substantiality Our website uses only the necessary amount of copyrighted material to achieve the intended purpose and does not substitute for the original market of the copyrighted works. Effect on Market Value The use of copyrighted material on our website does not in any way diminish or affect the market value of the original work. We believe that our use constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you believe that any content on the website violates your copyright, please contact us providing the necessary information, and we will take appropriate action to address your concern.

John and Derek were a little late to the party for this album but had to talk about the power that Dave Davidson and the boys in Revocation brought with their latest outing New Gods, New Masters. They delve into the musicianship of the band, particularly highlighting guitarist Dave Davidson's skills, and reflect on the cultural commentary regarding technology and AI.www.shittalkreviews.comSpotify - https://tinyurl.com/STR-SpotifyApple Podcasts - https://tinyurl.com/STR-Apple-Podcasts#revocation#revocationband#davedavidson#daviddavidson#ashweber#harrylannon#alexweber#alexrudinger#deathmetal#technicaldeathmetal#techdeath#progressivemetal#thrashmetal#extrememetal #metalbladerecords#newgodsnewmastersDrop us a line! What bands do you want us to review? Who should we interview next?

Welcome back to the Bar Exam Toolbox podcast! In this episode, we explain the ways in which a validly executed will can be revoked (by a subsequent document, by a physical act, and by operation of law), and analyze examples illustrating these concepts.   In this episode, we discuss: The requirements for a valid will Revocation by a subsequent document Revocation by a physical act Revocation by operation of law Doctrine of dependent relative revocation A few hypotheticals and examples Resources: "Listen and Learn" series (https://barexamtoolbox.com/bar-exam-toolbox-podcast-archive-by-topic/bar-exam-toolbox-podcast-explaining-individual-mee-and-california-bar-essay-questions/#listen-learn) California Bar Examination – Essay Questions and Selected Answers, July 2021 (https://www.calbar.ca.gov/Portals/0/documents/admissions/Examinations/July-2021-CBX-Essay-Qs-and-Selected-Answers.pdf) California Bar Examination – Essay Questions and Selected Answers, July 2012 (https://www.calbar.ca.gov/Portals/0/documents/admissions/Examinations/CBXJuly2012_Selected_Answers_Essays_R.pdf) Podcast Episode 27: Tackling and MEE Question: Wills and Trusts (https://barexamtoolbox.com/podcast-episode-27-tackling-an-mee-question-wills-and-trusts/) Podcast Episode 326: Listen and Learn – Intestate Distribution (Wills and Trusts) (https://barexamtoolbox.com/podcast-episode-326-listen-and-learn-intestate-distribution-wills-and-trusts/) Podcast Episode 336: Listen and Learn – Will Formation and Execution (https://barexamtoolbox.com/podcast-episode-336-listen-and-learn-will-formation-and-execution/) SpacedRepetition.com (https://spacedrepetition.com/) Download the Transcript (https://barexamtoolbox.com/episode-337-listen-and-learn-will-revocation/) If you enjoy the podcast, we'd love a nice review and/or rating on Apple Podcasts (https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/bar-exam-toolbox-podcast-pass-bar-exam-less-stress/id1370651486) or your favorite listening app. And feel free to reach out to us directly. You can always reach us via the contact form on the Bar Exam Toolbox website (https://barexamtoolbox.com/contact-us/). Finally, if you don't want to miss anything, you can sign up for podcast updates (https://barexamtoolbox.com/get-bar-exam-toolbox-podcast-updates/)! Thanks for listening! Alison & Lee

In this episode we discuss the value for enterprises in running mass revocation drills and compare the merits of tabletop exercises versus voluntary revocation events.

Patreon Free Cashback We're back dropping bombs! This time we get into Gridiron, Dead Heat, Rage, Igorrr, Testament, Tribal Gaze, Revocation & Dark Angel. This Is Old Bollocks.  Show Video

A newly released report from a national security watchdog confirms what Islamic charities and civil liberties advocates have long argued: that the Canada Revenue Agency's approach to countering terrorist financing is deeply flawed. The report from the National Security and Intelligence Review Agency was triggered by years of allegations that the CRA's Review and Analysis Division unfairly targets Islamic charities due to bias and Islamophobia. Steven Zhou is Media and Communication Lead with the National Council of Canadian Muslims.

Join us as we discuss our favourite releases from September - C4, Castle Rat, Cult Burial, Heruvim, Last Retch, Paradise Lost, Revocation, Species, Violator, Werewolves, plus EP's from Lake Of Maggots, Missing Link & Peeling Flesh.We're also on Youtube - drop us a follow and subscribe for cool interviews and fun shows - https://www.youtube.com/@bangersmoshpodcast

Sponsors! -Crypto.com: Head to https://crypto.com today and be part of this historic move! That's https://crypto.com. Don't wait! -Perplexity! Download Perplexity's new AI-web browser, Comet, by heading to https://pplx.ai/Viva and let your browser work for you. Plus, right now when you download Comet - you get a month of Rumble Premium for free! -Gold! Go to https://goldsafeexchange.com/viva-frey-rumble-audience/#form & claim an additional $1,500 in FREE gold or silver with qualifying purchases

Patreon Cool Stuff Dave is back on the show and this time it's to chat about their latest album New Gods, New Masters. We get into how it all came together and also about the up coming 25th anniversary of the band. Then it's off to the news and there's plenty to get through including amazing tours, amazingly bad tours and what promises to be the worst metal Xmas album in history. This Is Armed & Harmless Bollocks. Video Interview Neil Turbin Live

REVOCATION will unleash their new album New Gods, New Masters on September 26th courtesy of Metal Blade Records. Guitarist, vocalist, and creative force behind the band, David Davidson, sits down for a conversation about the band, record, and more on this episode.Music by:Blindfolded And Led To The WoodsRevocationSpeciesIntro music by:Hot ZonePatreon: https://www.patreon.com/GettingitoutpodcastEmail: dan@gettingitout.netWebsite: http://gettingitout.net/Instagram: @getting_it_out_podcastFacebook: www.facebook.com/gettingitoutpodcastX: @GettingItOutPodSupport this show http://supporter.acast.com/getting-it-out. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this episode, Cary the Metal Geek and crew dive deep into a packed slate of metal and geekery. We kick things off with highlights and stories from ProgPower 2025, then pay heartfelt tributes to three legends we've recently lost: Robert Redford, Brent Hinds, and Tomas Lindberg. On the film and TV front, we unleash our thoughts on upcoming and cult-favorite projects, including Deathgasm 2, The Toxic Avenger, Nobody 2, Weapons, Peacemaker, Alien: Earth, The Long Walk, and Lego Voyagers. Along the way, we also discuss the phenomenon of Disney Adults and revisit the galaxy far, far away with Star Wars: Rebels. The gaming side of geekery levels up as we explore the new adventure Indiana Jones and the Great Circle: The Order of Giants, dive into the announcement of Borderlands 4, and slash our way through the cyber mayhem of Turbo Overkill. To wrap things up, George takes the mic for another round of George Hates Metal, with this episode's metal targets being In Mourning and Urne. We also dive into discussions on a wide range of bands, including Green Carnation, Arjen Anthony Lucassen, Novembers Doom, Sanguisugabogg, Krigsgrav, Nailed to Obscurity, Helstar, Coroner, Hooded Menace, Gjallhorn's Wrath, Revocation, Helloween, Amorphis, Baest, Between the Buried and Me, Der Weg einer Freiheit, and Falling Leaves. Packed with riffs, laughs, tributes, and geeky goodness, Episode 270 proves that wherever metal meets fandom, the Metal Geeks are there to preside over the Order of Geekery!

SUBSCRIBE TO JORDAN'S FREE NEWSLETTER. Get the facts, without the spin. UNBIASED offers a clear, impartial recap of US news, including politics, elections, legal news, and more. Hosted by lawyer Jordan Berman, each episode provides a recap of current political events plus breakdowns of complex concepts—like constitutional rights, recent Supreme Court rulings, and new legislation—in an easy-to-understand way. No personal opinions, just the facts you need to stay informed on the daily news that matters. If you miss how journalism used to be, you're in the right place. In today's episode: Prosecutors Officially Charge Robinson; Here's What We Found Out; Here's What You Need to Know About the Death Penalty in Utah (0:07) Judge Drops Terrorism-Related Charges Against Luigi Mangione; Here's Why (19:49) AG Bondi Draws Bipartisan Criticism for Saying DOJ Will Target Hate Speech; Here's What You Need to Know About First Amendment Protections (23:20) Disney and ABC Pull 'Jimmy Kimmel Live!' "Indefinitely"; Here's What You Need to Know About the First Amendment and Possible Government Coercion (28:38) Quick Hitters: Mississippi Hanging Deaths, Pennsylvania Officers Ambushed, Trump Tackles Crime in Memphis, ANTIFA to be Designated Terrorist Organization, Fed Cuts Interest Rates, Turning Point USA Names New CEO (41:06) Rumor Has It: Will a New Bill Allow the Revocation of U.S. Passports Based on Views and Speech? Did the DOJ Delete Its Own Study on Right Wing Violence? (44:47) Critical Thinking Segment (48:47) SUBSCRIBE TO JORDAN'S FREE NEWSLETTER. Watch this episode on YouTube. Follow Jordan on Instagram and TikTok. All sources for this episode can be found here.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

This week's Loaded Radio podcast features an exclusive, in-depth conversation with Dave Davidson of technical death metal titans Revocation, discussing their new album, New Gods, New Masters. We also sit down with Gwyn Strang and Sean Bilovecky from the atmospheric doom duo Frayle to get the full story behind their latest release, Heretics & Lullabies. Both albums showcase a significant evolution for the respective bands, making this episode an essential listen for fans of extreme and ethereal metal. Featured Artists: Revocation New Album: New Gods, New Masters (Out September 26, 2025)   Frayle New Album: Heretics & Lullabies (Out October 10, 2025)   Connect with Loaded Radio: Website: loadedradio.com Facebook: facebook.com/loadedradioofficial X (Twitter): twiter.com/loadedradio Instagram: instagram.com/loaded.radio Subscribe to the Loaded Radio Podcast: Keep it heavy!

Garza sits down in-person with Dave Davidson. Vocalist, guitar player & founder of death metal band REVOCATION. New album “New Gods, New Masters” out September 26th! https://linktr.ee/revocationofficialSPONSORS:Sweetwater - https://imp.i114863.net/rnrmVBDistroKid - https://distrokid.com/vip/garza 30% OFF!00:00 - New Album02:52 - Aerosmith08:22 - Boston Latin School/Art School14:12 - Attending/Teaching at Berklee15:20 - Karate & Childhood Hobbies17:56 - Boston Accent20:01 - Playing Jazz Guitar24:35 - Wes Montgomery25:57 - Expensive Vintage Guitars35:17 - Jackson Warriors46:46 - Riff: Warm Up Riffs53:39 - Riff: Cronenberged & Gallop Picking1:00:02 - Favorite Revocation Riffs1:04:17 - Dave's Morning Routine1:05:43 - Meditation1:08:29 - Jogging/Exercising1:11:06 - Intro to Jazz Chords1:21:27 - Dave Breaking His Wrist1:24:31 - Illinois Tornado Incident1:32:06 - Top 5 Movies1:34:30 - Jazz // Counter Culture1:36:30 - Miles Davis1:42:33 - Riff: Freestyle Jam1:45:08 - Best Guitar/Kicks Combo1:46:15 - Gorguts & Pallid Veil1:52:21 - Carlo's in Boston

This week, the legendary Kristian “Gaahl” Espedal makes his return to Into The Necrosphere. I had the opportunity to sit down with him face-to-face at his art gallery in Bergen during this year's Beyond The Gates Festival, and we set the world to rights—discussing everything from the state of modern society to the recent Gaahl's Wyrd record, the sequel-in-progress to the last Trelldom album, and, of course, we drank some wine. On the Weekly News rant, the latest singles by Despised Icon, Innumerable Forms, Author & Punisher, Revocation, and others are rounded up for judgment. PLUS, I answer your questions, including my take on the upcoming Dricus du Plessis vs. Khamzat Chimaev bout at UFC 319, how I manage to juggle a podcast with a career and normal life, the possibility of a live Into The Necrosphere event, and more.   Please support the bands featured on this episode: Gaahls Wyrd:  https://gaahlswyrd.bandcamp.com/  Trelldom:  https://trelldom.bandcamp.com/     Subscribe for weekly black and death metal interviews, news rants, and track reviews! Follow me on X, Instagram and Facebook, and check out the other podcasts by the Horsemen Of the Podcasting Apocalypse:  Horrorwolf 666, Iblis Manifestations, Everything Went Black, Necromaniacs and The Sol Nox Podcast.

A Chinese man wanted by Interpol for bribery claims Cypriot authorities didn't notify him of his passport's revocation, but the court found no ‘irreparable harm.'View the full article here.Subscribe to the IMI Daily newsletter here. 

We continue our discussion of CPS misalignment by discussing the reasons for revocation as a remedy, its disadvantages, and the possibility of another solution that provides the same benefits at less cost.

Is your organization struggling with secret management across bare metal, hybrid, and multi-cloud environments? Standard cloud-native tools often fall short when you need a single, standardized solution that bridges all your infrastructure.Dan Popescu, Senior Site Reliability Engineer at Booking.com joins us to share how they built a cloud-agnostic secret management strategy using HashiCorp Vault. We dive deep into the technical challenges of providing identity to bare metal machines, rotating dynamic secrets in legacy and modern applications, and why a central "broker" for authentication is critical for security at scale.Guest Socials -⁠⁠ Dan 's Linkedin Podcast Twitter - ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠@CloudSecPod⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠If you want to watch videos of this LIVE STREAMED episode and past episodes - Check out our other Cloud Security Social Channels:-⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Cloud Security Podcast- Youtube⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠- ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Cloud Security Newsletter ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠- ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Cloud Security BootCamp⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠If you are interested in AI Cybersecurity, you can check out our sister podcast -⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ AI Cybersecurity PodcastQuestions asked:(00:00) Introduction(02:13) Dan's Background: From Cloud (AWS, GCP) to Bare Metal(03:06) The Core Challenges: Secret Exposure, Rotation & Access Control(04:45) Why Cloud-Native Fails at Scale: The Cost of 500k Requests/Min(07:32) What is a "Secret"? (It's More Than Just Passwords)(09:12) The Secret Lifecycle: Rotation, Revocation & Caching Issues(10:33) Securing Bare Metal: The Unique Challenge of On-Prem Secrets(15:44) Kubernetes & Container Secrets: Sidecars vs. Operators(18:36) The Pain of Moving from Static to Dynamic Secrets(20:40) How Do Machines Get an Identity? (Cloud IAM vs. Bare Metal)(24:28) A Practical Roadmap: Where to Start Standardizing Secrets(26:53) Key Learnings & Technical Pitfalls to Avoid(28:59) The Fun Section

What drives our daily choices? Jesse Cope challenges listeners to examine their priorities and how they align with their professed values. Do we truly make time for God and Scripture first, or are other things consuming our attention? This honest self-assessment sets the stage for a wide-ranging exploration of faith's role in personal and national life.The podcast delves into the biblical warning about being "unequally yoked" in marriage—a principle with profound implications beyond relationships. When spouses don't share fundamental spiritual commitments, the foundation becomes unstable. This concept extends to our national character, where America's founders recognized that while religious freedom was essential, the nation's survival depended on citizens voluntarily embracing biblical principles.Through powerful historical examples, Jesse illustrates how character should always trump denominational identity. Abraham Lincoln's presidential oath, taken with his hand on Matthew 7:1, reminds us that moral clarity doesn't require harsh judgment. The forgotten story of Frank Dwight Baldwin, a double Medal of Honor recipient who risked everything to save innocent lives, stands in stark contrast to our cultural reluctance to confront modern evils like human trafficking.A sobering reading from Fox's Book of Martyrs recounts the horrific persecution of French Protestants after the Revocation of the Edict of Nantes in 1685. The brutal methods used by Catholic authorities under Louis XIV demonstrate what happens when religious institutions claim infallibility and when political powers suppress truth. These historical lessons find modern parallels in authoritarian regimes that similarly silence dissent.The episode concludes with Mercy Otis Warren's insights on Thomas Hutchinson, whose religious appearance masked his betrayal of American liberties. Her analysis reveals the danger of valuing religious affiliation over genuine character—a warning that resonates powerfully today. As we face mounting cultural challenges, will we choose leaders based on substance rather than style? Will we prioritize Christ's teachings above denominational or partisan loyalties?Join the conversation and share this episode with someone who needs encouragement in their faith journey. Together, we can rediscover the principles that made America great and will sustain us through these challenging times.Support the showThe American Soul Podcasthttps://www.buzzsprout.com/1791934/subscribe

Hadwan v. Dept. of State, No. 22-1624 (2d Cir. June 3, 2025)revocation of Consular Report of Birth Abroad (CRBA); revocation of passport abroad; CRBA revocation hearing; APA; due process; signed statement where signatory does not speak English; Office of Inspector General report against State Department officer Matter of B-N-K-, 29 I&N Dec. 96 (BIA 2025)administrative closure; 8 C.F.R. § 1003.18; Matter of W-Y-U; recalendaring; TPS; persuasive reason for removal proceedings to  be resolved on the merits Singh v. Bondi, No. 22-6077 (2d Cir. June 3, 2025)credibility; border interview; REAL ID Act; I-213; Ramsameachire factors; Sikh; India Linares-Rivas v. Bondi, 24-60186 (5th Cir. June 3, 2025)no jurisdiction to review non-LPR cancellation of removal discretion finding; exhaustion; issue raised in notice of appeal but not in BIA brief Hsieh v. Bondi, No. 24-1013 (4th Cir. June 4, 2025)sexual abuse of a minor; coercion or enticement of a minor under 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b); crime of child abuse; Esquivel-Quintana; mens rea; attemptSponsors and friends of the podcast!Kurzban Kurzban Tetzeli and Pratt P.A.Immigration, serious injury, and business lawyers serving clients in Florida, California, and all over the world for over 40 years.Cerenade"Leader in providing smart, secure, and intuitive cloud-based solutions"Demo Link!Click me too!Stafi"Remote staffing solutions for businesses of all sizes"Promo Code: STAFI2025Click me!Gonzales & Gonzales Immigration BondsP: (833) 409-9200immigrationbond.com Want to become a patron?Click here to check out our Patreon Page!CONTACT INFORMATIONEmail: kgregg@kktplaw.comFacebook: @immigrationreviewInstagram: @immigrationreviewTwitter: @immreviewAbout your hostCase notesRecent criminal-immigration article (p.18)Featured in San Diego VoyagerDISCLAIMER & CREDITSSee Eps. 1-200Support the show

Send us a textJamey Jasta Joins the Vulgar Display of Podcast to Talk Milwaukee Metal Fest, Summer Slaughter, and the Future of Metal

Alysa Z. Hutnik, Jennifer Rodden Wainwright On April 7, 2025, the FCC's Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau (CGB) released an order announcing a one-year delay of a new implementing rule for the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) related to consumers' ability to revoke consent to receive autodialed and/or prerecorded calls and texts. The order was issued just days before the rule was scheduled to take effect on April 11. Below we summarize CGB's action and explain what it means for businesses going forward.

First, The Indian Express Deeptiman Tiwary discusses Mehul Choksi, a key accused in the Punjab National Bank loan fraud, was arrested in Belgium.Second, we talk to The Indian Express' Vidheesha Kuntamalla about the frequent US visa revocations of the Indian students and its implications. (10:59)Lastly, we speak about why BJP MP Nishikant Dubey is again at the center of a controversy. (18:55)Hosted by Ichha SharmaProduced and written by Shashank Bhargava, Niharika Nanda and Ichha SharmaEdited and mixed by Suresh Pawar

significant changes and playoffs surface around the association, Revocation of visas to prevent players from being everywhere they want to be. Mental health amongst collegiate athletes.

Columbia University grad student Mahmoud Khalil is considered a leader in anti-Israel protests on campus. ICE arrested him on Saturday and revoked his green card. Activists are calling this an attack on free speech. On Friday, several Native American tribes sued the federal government over staff cuts at Native colleges. They claim the cuts violate the government’s unique legal and moral responsibility to the tribes. U.K. natives Ned Franc and Jon Moody blend soul songwriting with analog synthesizers and disco grooves to produce dancefloor euphoria. Their fourth album is “Chewing the Fat.” The cheap American egg was the product of billions of dollars of investment in industrial agriculture. Now those technologies are spreading bird flu — and hiking egg prices.   

In this episode of Bionic Planet, Season 10, Episode 115, we dive into the significant environmental implications of the executive orders signed by President Donald Trump on his first day in office. Originally, we had planned to focus this season on Africa, but the rapid changes in U.S. environmental policy prompted us to shift gears. I connected with Tim Male last week. Tim, who founded the Environmental Policy Innovation Center in 2017, has a wealth of experience in environmental policy, having worked in various capacities, including at the White House and with organizations like Defenders of Wildlife. Both Tim and I share a commitment to addressing climate challenges, despite our differing perspectives on party policies. In our discussion, we unpack Tim's recent LinkedIn post, where he meticulously breaks down the ten executive actions that target environmental regulations. We explore the unprecedented number of executive orders issued in such a short time frame and the potential consequences of these actions. Tim emphasizes that while executive orders can set priorities for federal agencies, they must still align with existing laws, which can lead to legal challenges. We delve into specific orders, starting with the requirement for the "God squad" under the Endangered Species Act to meet more frequently and expedite reviews of projects that could impact endangered species. Tim explains the historical context of this committee and its potential to prioritize development over environmental protections. Next, we discuss directives to the Army Corps of Engineers to expedite permitting processes under the Clean Water Act and the Endangered Species Act, raising concerns about the implications for environmental safeguards. Tim provides insights into the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and its role in ensuring that federal actions minimize environmental harm. We also examine the revocation of President Carter's executive order aimed at making environmental impact statements more accessible to the public, which Tim argues could lead to confusion and inconsistency across federal agencies. The episode continues with a discussion on the rescinding of protections for ancient forests and the withdrawal from international efforts to combat deforestation. Tim highlights the significance of ecosystem service valuation and the potential loss of guidance that could have helped quantify the benefits of environmental services. We touch on the broader implications of these actions, including the potential for increased energy production at the expense of environmental protections. As we wrap up, we reflect on the long-term consequences of these executive orders and the potential for legal challenges. Tim expresses concern about the sweeping nature of these actions and the message they send to communities affected by energy projects. This episode serves as a critical examination of the intersection between politics and environmental policy, providing listeners with a deeper understanding of the current landscape and the challenges ahead in the fight against climate change. Timestamps 00:00:00 - Introduction to Season 10 and Episode Overview 00:02:09 - Trump's Executive Orders on Environmental Policies 00:03:29 - The Role of Executive Orders in U.S. Government 00:04:01 - Critique of Trump's Environmental Actions 00:05:01 - Legal Challenges to Executive Orders 00:06:19 - Endangered Species Act and the God Squad 00:10:11 - Clean Water Act and Emergency Procedures 00:13:42 - Understanding NEPA (National Environmental Policy Act) 00:16:03 - Revocation of Carter's NEPA Executive Order 00:19:12 - Rescinding Protections for Ancient Forests 00:21:49 - International Cooperation on Deforestation 00:23:09 - Ecosystem Service Valuation Guidance Rescinded 00:28:05 - Nature-Based Solutions and Their Importance 00:29:59 - Action Plans for Energy Production Regulations 00:32:19 - Suspension of Policies Related to Energy in Alaska 00:34:27 - Impact of Schedule F on Federal Employment 00:38:11 - DOJ Teams and Federal Workforce Changes 00:41:00 - The Role of Professionals in Government 00:44:25 - Conclusion and Future Implications Quotes "On his very first day in office, President Donald Trump signed 78 executive actions, and 10 of them targeted environmental policies." - 00:02:09 "It's pretty hard to find the wheat among the chaff in this set of actions from the environment." - 00:04:01 "What this order is foreshadowing is a bunch of people who are much more likely to prioritize a development project are going to get the final say on conflicts involving endangered species." - 00:09:33 "This is really just we're not going to do it." - 00:04:33 "The law is pretty limited in terms of who can, you know, ask for an appeal of the decision." - 00:10:21 "This is a part of that same executive order from President Biden that is being rescinded." - 00:20:25 "It's a broad and messy brush that they're painting across the forest landscape in a way that is pretty harmful." - 00:21:18 "This is a White House that's showing great interest in expanding the power of the White House." - 00:18:00 "There's people across the federal government who are very creative at saying, well, you've told me to do it this way, and that's not legal." - 00:42:19 "At the end of the day, I don't know what your philosophy is on how democracy is supposed to work, but, you know, at some level, the winner is supposed to get to decide what happens next." - 00:36:38 Keywords Bionic Planet Season 10 Episode 115 Donald Trump Tim Mayle Environmental Policy Innovation Center White House Defenders of Wildlife Nairobi LinkedIn Endangered Species Act Alaska Clean Water Act National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) Obama administration Biden administration Anthropocene Steve Zwick snail darter whooping cranes Trans-Alaskan pipeline liquefied natural gas (LNG) Tongass National Forest U.S. Digital Service Virginia Youngkin ecosystem services climate emergency energy dominance fossil fuels Native Alaskans Paris Accord Washington, D.C. environmental impact statements mitigation banking biodiversity carbon sequestration emergency procedures federal workforce Schedule F Department of Justice (DOJ)

In this episode of the "How to Protect the Ocean" podcast, host Andrew Lewin discusses the significant executive actions Donald Trump took on his first day in office that will impact ocean policies. The episode highlights several key policies that were revoked or altered, which pose threats to the ocean environment: Revocation of Biden's Executive Orders: Trump rescinded multiple executive orders from the Biden administration to protect public health and the environment and address the climate crisis. This included orders that directed federal agencies to confront climate change and protect marine ecosystems. Removal of Offshore Exploration Protections: Trump's actions included the removal of protections against offshore oil and natural gas exploration on the outer continental shelf. This could lead to increased drilling activities, which are detrimental to marine environments. National Energy Emergency Declaration: Trump declared a national energy emergency, which expedited the review and permitting processes for new oil and gas production. This declaration is seen as favoring fossil fuels over renewable energy sources, despite the latter being more cost-effective and environmentally friendly. Halting Offshore Wind Projects: In a contradictory move, Trump issued a temporary withdrawal of all areas on the outer continental shelf from offshore wind leasing. This decision undermines the development of renewable energy sources that could help mitigate climate change. Dismantling of the Civil Service: The reinstatement of Schedule F allows for the conversion of career civil servants into political appointees, which could weaken the scientific integrity and effectiveness of agencies like NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) and BOEM (Bureau of Ocean Energy Management). Withdrawal from the Paris Climate Accord: Trump's decision to pull out of the Paris Agreement removes the U.S. from international climate negotiations, limiting its ability to influence global climate policy and potentially exacerbating ocean-related issues. The episode emphasizes the importance of public engagement and advocacy to counter these policies, urging listeners to contact their representatives to express support for ocean protection initiatives. Link to article: https://www.southernfriedscience.com/how-donald-trumps-day-1-executive-actions-impact-the-ocean/  Follow a career in conservation: https://www.conservation-careers.com/online-training/ Use the code SUFB to get 33% off courses and the careers program.   Do you want to join my Ocean Community? Sign Up for Updates on the process: www.speakupforblue.com/oceanapp   Sign up for our Newsletter: http://www.speakupforblue.com/newsletter   Facebook Group: https://bit.ly/3NmYvsI Connect with Speak Up For Blue: Website: https://bit.ly/3fOF3Wf Instagram: https://bit.ly/3rIaJSG TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@speakupforblue Twitter: https://bit.ly/3rHZxpc YouTube: www.speakupforblue.com/youtube  

Viana Guedes, et al., v, Mayorkas, et al., No. 24-1228 (1st Cir. Dec. 16, 2024)I-140 revocation; Bouarfa; jurisdiction; Patel; EB-2 NIW; discretion  Salomon-Guillen v. Garland, No. 23-1723 (4th Cir. Dec. 18, 2024)temporary Appellate Immigration Judge; substantive vs. internal housekeeping regulations; agency following regulations where rights are affected; INA § 103(g); discretionary findings; extreme hardship; Patel Albayero-Gomez v. Garland, No. 23-3549 (8th Cir. Dec. 20, 2024)asylum; Matter of Burbano; unable or unwilling to protect; Guatemala  Luna v. Garland, No. 21-60195 (5th Cir. Dec. 17, 2024)in absentia motion to reopen; Campos-Chavez; deficient NTA; Rodriguez; non-receipt of notice of hearing; sworn affidavit; presumption of delivery Cuenca-Arroyo v. Garland, No. 23-60100 (5th Cir. Dec. 18, 2024)exceptional and extremely unusual hardship; Wilkinson; jurisdiction to review voluntary departure; review of request for continuance  Sponsors and friends of the podcast!Kurzban Kurzban Tetzeli and Pratt P.A.Immigration, serious injury, and business lawyers serving clients in Florida, California, and all over the world for over 40 years.Docketwise"Modern immigration software & case management"Cerenade"Leader in providing smart, secure, and intuitive cloud-based solutions"Click me!Stafi"Remote staffing solutions for businesses of all sizes"Promo Code: stafi2024Get Started! Promo Code: FREEImmigration Lawyer's Toolboxhttps://immigrationlawyerstoolbox.com/immigration-reviewWant to become a patron?Click here to check out our Patreon Page!CONTACT INFORMATIONEmail: kgregg@kktplaw.comFacebook: @immigrationreviewInstagram: @immigrationreviewTwitter: @immreviewAbout your hostCase notesRecent criminal-immigration article (p.18)Featured in San Diego VoyagerDISCLAIMER & CREDITSSee Eps. 1-200Support the show

Case round up:United States v. Burwell, No. 16-3009 (D.C. Cir. Dec. 9, 2024) – crime of violence; divisibility; Federal bank robbery in violation of U.S.C. § 2113(a); common law robbery; Mathis peek; jury instructionsTreez, Inc. v. DHS, Case No. 22-cv-07027 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 3, 2024) – marijuana dispensary; H-1B; aiding and abetting controlled substance act violation Bouarfa v. Mayorkas, et al., No. 23-583 (U.S. Dec. 10, 2024)revocation of I-130 petition; INA § 204(c); jurisdiction; discretion; may; INA § 242(a)(2)(B)(ii) Matter of Dominguez Reyes, 28 I&N Dec. 878 (BIA 2024)amount of loss; circumstance specific approach; INA § 101(a)(43)(D); certification of criminal documents  Quito-Guachichulca v. Garland, No. 23-1069 (8th Cir. Dec. 9, 2024)aggravated felony rape; INA § 101(a)(43)(A); sexual abuse; digital penetration; statutory interpretation; survey of state case law; res judicataMondzali Bopaka v. Garland, No. 21-1384 (1st Cir. Dec. 13, 2024)adverse credibility; motion to reopen to submit new evidence; I-589 errors and omissions; inconsistencies; ineffective assistance of counsel motion to reopen; Republic of the Congo Lopez-Quinteros v. Garland, No. 23-1890 (1st Cir. Dec. 13, 2024)family based particular social group; business owners; mixed motive; gang extortion; El SalvadorSponsors and friends of the podcast!Kurzban Kurzban Tetzeli and Pratt P.A.Immigration, serious injury, and business lawyers serving clients in Florida, California, and all over the world for over 40 years.Docketwise"Modern immigration software & case management"Cerenade"Leader in providing smart, secure, and intuitive cloud-based solutions"Click me!Stafi"Remote staffing solutions for businesses of all sizes"Promo Code: stafi2024Get Started! Promo Code: FREEImmigration Lawyer's Toolboxhttps://immigrationlawyerstoolbox.com/immigration-reviewWant to become a patron?Click here to check out our Patreon Page!CONTACT INFORMATIONEmail: kgregg@kktplaw.comFacebook: @immigrationreviewInstagram: @immigrationreviewTwitter: @immreviewAbout your hostCase notesRecent criminal-immigration article (p.18)Featured in San Diego VoyagerDISCLAIMER & CREDITSSee Eps. 1-200Support the show

The Peace Officers Standards and Training (POST) Commission has revoked the police certification of William Farwell, a former Stoughton officer, following his involvement in the Sandra Birchmore case. William is the twin brother of Matthew Farwell, who has been charged with Birchmore's murder. William agreed to voluntarily give up his certification as a law enforcement officer in Massachusetts, according to POST commission documents. The decision comes after he was accused of misleading state police investigators regarding the nature of his relationship with Birchmore, who died at the age of 23. The POST also added William's name to the National Decertification Index (NDI), a national registry of officers who have had their credentials revoked. **Background on the Case** Sandra Birchmore first met the Farwell brothers through the Stoughton Police Department's Explorers Program in 2011, where both William and Matthew served as guest instructors. Investigations revealed that Matthew Farwell groomed Birchmore from a young age, leading to a years-long sexual relationship. Authorities allege that Matthew killed Birchmore when she became pregnant with his child in 2021 and staged her death to appear as a suicide. "Matthew Farwell has been federally indicted for killing Sandra Birchmore, and prosecutors may pursue the death penalty," reported Boston 25 News. **William Farwell's Involvement** William's inappropriate conduct extended beyond his brother's relationship with Birchmore. Investigators uncovered evidence that William had exchanged sexually explicit messages, including photos and videos, with Birchmore when she was about 22. Additionally, he conducted 26 unauthorized searches for Birchmore in a police database and 24 searches for himself, all without official law enforcement justification. A 2022 internal investigation by Stoughton Police revealed that William, Matthew, and another officer, Robert C. Devine, had inappropriate relationships with Birchmore. As part of his agreement with the POST, William has been barred from ever working in law enforcement in Massachusetts again. The commission stated, "Revocation of certification ensures accountability for officers who engage in misconduct, protecting the integrity of law enforcement." Birchmore's tragic death continues to shake the Stoughton community, especially as more details emerge about the involvement of multiple officers who held positions of authority in her life. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

The Peace Officers Standards and Training (POST) Commission has revoked the police certification of William Farwell, a former Stoughton officer, following his involvement in the Sandra Birchmore case. William is the twin brother of Matthew Farwell, who has been charged with Birchmore's murder. William agreed to voluntarily give up his certification as a law enforcement officer in Massachusetts, according to POST commission documents. The decision comes after he was accused of misleading state police investigators regarding the nature of his relationship with Birchmore, who died at the age of 23. The POST also added William's name to the National Decertification Index (NDI), a national registry of officers who have had their credentials revoked. **Background on the Case** Sandra Birchmore first met the Farwell brothers through the Stoughton Police Department's Explorers Program in 2011, where both William and Matthew served as guest instructors. Investigations revealed that Matthew Farwell groomed Birchmore from a young age, leading to a years-long sexual relationship. Authorities allege that Matthew killed Birchmore when she became pregnant with his child in 2021 and staged her death to appear as a suicide. "Matthew Farwell has been federally indicted for killing Sandra Birchmore, and prosecutors may pursue the death penalty," reported Boston 25 News. **William Farwell's Involvement** William's inappropriate conduct extended beyond his brother's relationship with Birchmore. Investigators uncovered evidence that William had exchanged sexually explicit messages, including photos and videos, with Birchmore when she was about 22. Additionally, he conducted 26 unauthorized searches for Birchmore in a police database and 24 searches for himself, all without official law enforcement justification. A 2022 internal investigation by Stoughton Police revealed that William, Matthew, and another officer, Robert C. Devine, had inappropriate relationships with Birchmore. As part of his agreement with the POST, William has been barred from ever working in law enforcement in Massachusetts again. The commission stated, "Revocation of certification ensures accountability for officers who engage in misconduct, protecting the integrity of law enforcement." Birchmore's tragic death continues to shake the Stoughton community, especially as more details emerge about the involvement of multiple officers who held positions of authority in her life. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

Sitting Ducks DNS attack A Bad RCE in another Microsoft server SinkClose The CLFS.SYS BSoD IsBootSecure Rethinking Revocation Show Notes - https://www.grc.com/sn/SN-987-Notes.pdf Hosts: Steve Gibson and Leo Laporte Download or subscribe to this show at https://twit.tv/shows/security-now. Get episodes ad-free with Club TWiT at https://twit.tv/clubtwit You can submit a question to Security Now at the GRC Feedback Page. For 16kbps versions, transcripts, and notes (including fixes), visit Steve's site: grc.com, also the home of the best disk maintenance and recovery utility ever written Spinrite 6. Sponsors: joindeleteme.com/twit promo code TWIT bigid.com/securitynow vanta.com/SECURITYNOW 1password.com/securitynow