Podcasts about dryas

PICTISH TRAIL and LAURA are here once again with all the LOST MAP news YOU need for your earholes. This month's episode features new music from FIRESTATIONS, a brand-new single from Cornish collective BLIND YEO, an intro to the band OWEN & THE EYEBALLS, and news of a forthcoming album from FELL. Our featured interview is a deep-dive conversation with FAITH ELIOTT and producer/multi-instrumentalist ROBYN DAWSON, chatting about the making of Faith's new album Dryas.To support what we do at Lost Map, join our membership club – PostMap Club! Get postcards each month with download codes for new music, plus a badge, newsletter, and 15% off records, CDs, tapes, and merch. Digital memberships are available too. Visit lostmap.com/club for details.NEW MEMBERS in June 2025 will receive a bumper pack of postcards and a brand-new Lost Map CD compilation, featuring our best tracks from the past year.-SOME VERY USEFUL LINKS:Join PostMap Club: lostmap.com/clubFaith Eliott - dryasFirestations - Many White Horses LPAnother Evening On The Fringe with Pictish TrailVisit Good Vibes Record Store!Bobble hats, caps and T-shirtsIf you'd like to get in touch about anything, plop us an email: club@lostmap.com-This episode of the Lost Map Podcast was presented by Pictish Trail and Laura Doherty. Editing and additional production from Joe Cormack.

Episodio in collaborazione con Kear Finance. Vai su klearfinance.com per scoprire di cosa si tratta e per registrarti gratuitamente alla piattaforma! Alcuni studiosi ritengono che circa 12'500 anni fa ci sia stato un periodo di drastico abbassamento delle temperature, denominato appunto Dryas Recente - durato circa 1300 anni quindi troppo poco per essere considerato un'era glaciale - in cui eventi atmosferici estremi avrebbero decimato la popolazione umana sulla Terra. Questi fatti avrebbero portato a "dimenticare" almeno in parte le civiltà passate, costringendo le persone rimaste a ripartire quasi da zero. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Join Hugh Ross in this breaking News of the Day episode of Stars, Cells, and God. Hugh describes the discovery of microspherules and meltglass at three North American sites, consistent with low-altitude airbursts from a disintegrating comet, that explain the Younger Dryas cooling onset 12,800 years ago. Bolide Airbursts Trigger Recent Global Cooling Event During the younger Dryas (12,800–11,700 years ago), global mean temperatures plummeted by 10–15°C. This cooling event, in part, explains the unprecedented climate stability that persisted from 9,500 to 75 years ago. Geologists had cited the Hiawatha Impact Crater in northwestern Greenland as evidence for an asteroid impact that caused the younger Dryas cooling event. Recently, physicists disputed the claimed 12,800 years ago date for the Hiawatha Crater, citing argon-argon and uranium-lead dating of zircon crystals that yielded a melt date of 57.99±0.54 million years ago. 26 scientists report their discovery of microspherules, meltglass, nanodiamonds, and combustion aerosols, consistent with them being caused by low-altitude airbursts, at sites in New Jersey, Maryland, and South Carolina. The microspherules, meltglass, and nanodiamonds all have radiocarbon dates of 12,835—12,735 years ago. The implied melt temperatures range from 1,250°C to 3,053°C. The high-temperature, high-pressure shock waves generated by low-altitude airbursts from a disintegrating comet would explain the Younger Dryas Cooling Event and the accompanying multi-continent megafaunal extinctions but would not necessarily leave behind any discoverable impact craters. Links & Resources:  Platinum, Shock-Fractured Quartz, Microspherules, and Meltglass Widely Distributed in Eastern USA at the Younger Dryas Onset (12.8 ka) Hugh Ross, Weathering Climate Change (Covina, CA: RTB Press, 2020): 149–161, 187–191.

This was a live-to-youtube stream where we are joined in the Cube by Laura to talk about the Cosmic Summit, the many great speakers and presentations there, and to respond to listener communications and live chat questions.Thanks to all of you who joined the live show!This show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/4656375/advertisement

George Howard joins us to discuss his knowledge of the Alaskan Pleistocene bonebeds we were reading about in Path of the Pole. George has a lot of interesting information about these deposits, including a Comet Research Group study on cosmic material recovered from sediments embedded in the bones themselves.We also discuss a similar massive bonebed right here in Texas that George has known about for many years. For various reasons, these bonebeds haven't really been properly studied, but maybe that will change in the near future...Visit George's website, the Cosmic Tusk: https://cosmictusk.com/ Sign up for the Cosmic Summit 2023: https://cosmicsummit2023.com/

Esto es HistoCast. No es Esparta pero casi. Volvemos con otro episodio más de desastres naturales, esta vez vamos con periodos fríos y áridos junto a @LeoYElMedievo, Carlos Arteaga, @DeividNagan y @goyix_salduero. - Presentación de Carlos y LeonorSecciones Historia: - La crisis del Dryas y el lago Agassiz - 8:07 - Evento 4.2 - 34:25 - Caídas de meteoritos - 42:00 - Turismo Asturias: Covadonga y Cangas de Onís - 51:27 - Episodio Frío Altomedieval - 1:17:14 - Pequeña Edad de Hielo - 1:31:27 - Bibliografía - 2:17:53

Speaker 0 (0s): Yeah, our life, ladies and gentlemen, welcome back to the TrueLife podcast. We are here with the author of No Absolutes, a fascinating individual, and a friend of mine. I'm not afraid to call him a friend of mine. He's a great person. And we're going to get into some more ideas about No Absolutes in history and anything else that comes our way. Benjamin. Is there any, you want to introduce yourself and if you want to start off with, Speaker 1 (28s): Yeah, actually it looks like my livestream popped up and I'm getting a me in the background. So one second. Speaker 0 (50s): Sorry Speaker 1 (51s): About that. Speaker 0 (52s): No apologies, man. No Absolutes. No apologies. It Speaker 1 (55s): Happens right. There we go. Speaker 0 (58s): So we again, go ahead. I'm sorry. Speaker 1 (1m 1s): No, please go ahead. Speaker 0 (1m 3s): So we began our momentary conversation before the podcast talking about symbols, talking about it's almost like another language, these obtuse, but familiar ideas that seem to be implanted in us by being bombarded on us. And I know a little bit about them, but I think it's a, and you may think it's a nice segue into history. Can you tell me a little bit about what you know about symbols or what do you think about some of those ideas? Speaker 1 (1m 33s): Sure. Well, I mean, you know, symbology is all around us. It's, you know, our writing is simple, right? Which kind of goes back to, you know, words are important, how we think are important, you know, because that symbology is, it's very powerful. We're, we're attached to symbology inextricably, you know, you touched on it in a video that she made yesterday, I believe, but, you know, we have ancient symbols that have traversed the world, and yet we don't, we don't really have a good meaning of what they are. And w you know, one of those symbols is that swastika, the swastika symbol, which it happens in the one you showed was the, the east Indian one, but it occurs in indigenous tribes across the world. And from my understanding, a lot of those indigenous tribes use that as kind of like a signifier for the season and the changing of the seasons, the, for the hemispheres, you know, the segments of it. And then the dots would represent the equinoxes. And that was also a tool for how they constructed structures to orient them into the right directions to, and, you know, that's just one of how many hundreds, if not thousands of symbols that, that are all around us, another one you pointed to as the Starbucks one and recall, I'm not, it was a few years ago, but I think somebody did a dive on that. And it goes back to the restroom, I think, and it was the God and MENA goddess MENA the scene or something like that. So, you know, it's really interesting that we see a symbol like that pop-up today, and we see them all around, you know, CERN just turned on and they have a symbol of Shiva in front of CERN, you know, and then we have less familiar ones, of course, but our history is replete with symbols. And so I wanted to segue that into, you know, kind of the history of things in my book. I've just did a brief history of things. And since then, I've done a lot more research and, you know, it really seems to me that there's a cyclical kind of nature to what we call society, what we call our ancient societies are actually from the evidence that I've been exposed to. And I've researched, they're kind of a repop of civilization after the late, the last cataclysm, which I, how familiar are you with? Like the younger, Dryas curious, Speaker 0 (4m 21s): I'm pretty familiar with it. I've seen a lot of like Charles Hopkins work on catastrophism and, you know, I've seen some interesting maps in the ancient maps of the sea Kings. There's a great book by called the Adam and Eve story. That is all about cataclysms. So I'm kind of familiar, but I'm sure you can enlighten me and the audience with, with some of the younger Dryas information. Speaker 1 (4m 43s): Well, so a lot of like there's Randall Carlson and I, you know, he's a big proponent that there was an impact or event. The more and more I've researched into that. I think there definitely was an impact there, but I don't think it was caused from a common, I actually think it was ejected from my son. And it's really interesting when we start to look at like the oldest structures in the world, you know, you have all of these polygon walls, we have all of these pyramid structures, you know, they just discovered a huge pyramid under the water off the coast of Portugal heading towards DA's doors. And I noticed you have Atlantis and in your map back there, but when, and all, all we're finding is more and more evidence of this, and it's older and older and older, you know, you got , you're all, you know, dated two 11,800 years or BC. You have all of these really ancient sites that are just getting older and older and older. And then there's another phenomenon where some of the technology that is used to these sites is seemingly more and more advanced. You know, we, you know, there's a polygon of walls in, down in Peru, you know, even the great pyramid. We couldn't recreate those structures today, even with modern technology, you know, there might be some engineers who say I could do it, but by and large, you know, the other, the other side of that equation is could you get societal, will, could you get the funding? Could you, you know, could you orient the labor to do something like that for that kind of undertaking? And so what are the purpose of those things? And, you know, they're all claiming to be barrel chambers by what we're taught in textbooks from, you know, high school, the one thing that's consistent across all the world and wherever we find these things, these megalithic structures is there's no inscriptions, there's no writing on the wall. And if it was some sort of burial chamber religious thing, there's usually all sorts of adornments to those types of structures. And we just don't see that. So then that begs the question, well, why don't we see that? And my hypothesis is that these are actually more machines than they are just structures. You know, there's electric potential between different types of rocks that are used. There's all sorts of evidence that these things have some sort of greater purpose than just a giant monument to our God for, you know, a sacrificial chamber for a Pharaoh. And it's really interesting when you start to correlate that evidence with evidence of cyclic cyclical disasters on this planet, I did have a good point to that. No, I'm joking. So, and you know, now we're learning about all sorts of different cycles in this planet. There's a seven year oscillation in the core from a magnetism. We know that the magnetic poles are continually moving and they've started moving in certain directions and they haven't checked back. And now they're pretty far off kilter. There's a lot of hypothesis is of, you know, a whole flipping principle, this placement, all of these things. But when you look correlate that with chiro geologic records, we see magnetic shifts in the geologic record every 13, some thousand years, which is about the younger Dryas area. And then attached to that you had, so the hypothesis is this Atlanta says what it's typically called these days was a global civilization. There's genetic record to back that up. Now there's a lot of, you know, the mines in Wisconsin, where did all the copper go? You know, there's a lot, a lot of these pieces of evidence that are starting to stack up that really don't correlate with, oh yeah. History began, you know, 7,000 years ago. And here we are today. And I think this is an important aspect of kind of understanding our place in the world. Because if you don't know where you're, where you come from, it's kind of hard to know where you're going to. And so you have this global civilization that experiences a disaster, and then we see pockets of civilization, kind of a re-upped about, you know, 7,000 BC. And those pockets of civilization. My hypothesis is, is those were the remnants of a previous protocol culture that had already colonized the globe essentially. And I think that was a, and then when you start to look at like Sumerian Sumerian texts and like the, the ancient Kings list, you know, how long their rules were, it's kinda, you know, it's like, well, yeah, somebody could just make that up, but why would they inscribe it in stone? We have these pieces of evidence that continually are telling us that, oh, no, human life is quite a bit older than we subscribed to it. And it was actually potentially even more advanced than the past. And I think, you know, tying it back to the book, No Absolutes is that once you get that perspective that, oh, maybe, you know, we, aren't just kind of flittering in the sand here. We actually are part of a long lineage of things. And these events were not only known about, but they were inscribed across the world in these symbols. And so there's also some other interesting little things that we can segue. I'll just mention them, if you want a rabbit hole and, you know, sunspots on the sun, whenever the sun has these massive sunspots, we see them flaring on the backsides. We have the satellites up there now, but they have a really strong correlation of decreasing intensity whenever, whenever they're facing earth. So if you know, and this is getting really out there, but if I was to build a big global machine, that was to try to stop these, you know, the cyclical disaster, well, you need something that's monumental when you need it to be energetically driven. It needs to interact with the electromagnetic spectrum and it needs to create potentials and fields and all these things. And I suspect that at one point there was a group of people on this planet who understood that, and they built all those ancient megaliths and Manoa's to basically stabilize the earth. And I think that system broken, I think that's the story of the fall of Atlantis and, you know, combined with the other parts of it. And I, and I think we're kind of in a recovery mode since then kind of attaching back to the yoga cycles. And then you have the indigenous peoples across the world. You know, the ant people took them into the earth and brought them out. And this was the fourth time they had done it. We have a lot of these really old stories that kind of indicate that there is a cyclical disaster that impacts this planet. And I think, you know, that's kind of an important aspect to keep in mind when we look at the world, because the idea is that, oh, we already that's settled science. Right. They taught it to me in school, which settled science in itself is, you know, science is never settled. That's the whole point of it. But, you know, it's just like, it's right up there with trust the science. It's like, okay, you know, there's, there's a lot of problems inherent in our symbology. When we start to use words like that, use words are symbols. In those ways, it creates improper pictures. It creates division. It creates, you know, me verse you try verse tribe, all of these other things that we see playing in the world pretty consistently these days. Speaker 0 (13m 10s): Yeah. Yeah. I agree. I, I, it seems to me, well, let me, let me try to segue like this. You say in your book, If our observations consistently show the fluidity of existence and the constant fleetingness of rigidity, then why do we adhere to strongly to end perspectives that offer no flexibility. And when I apply that to history, the one thing about history that seems to be true is that we always get it wrong, but the planets are not in glass fears. We're not the center of the universe, you know, we, And if we always get it wrong, doesn't that probably mean that we're wrong now, you know, and it seems to me, if you look at humanity as a society, that's building back, it's all in the language. Like everything's in the language, that's built back better, the industrial revolution, like these are things that had already been done and we're just repeating them. It is that cycle. And I would add to your point that, you know, there's so much better ways to measure time than a clock. Like if you look at the planets in the book, I was reading the Adam and Eve story. They talk about a cataclysm happening like every 12,000 years. And when they look to the Zodiac, you know, you can see signs, for example, we're in the age of Aquarius, Aquarius is the water bear. And I always ask myself, if I am a society, like how do I come to the conclusion that I'm going to draw this giant person in the sky, dropping water, buckets of water, huge buckets of water. That seems to me like a flood is coming. Like we, we made this thing for you dummies in the future, and you're not even paying attention to it. You know, that that's a pretty intricate, incredible idea to, to create a lasting symbol or image that will last for eternity to tell people that is something that we can't do today, but it's there for us. So I would agree with your ideas on that. I, I, I, I believe Speaker 1 (15m 11s): And interesting on top of that, you know, the Zodiac, isn't just a single phenomenon. Like, you know, there's multiple indigenous tribes, there's multiple FA re foundings of society that all, you know, have a version of the Zodiac. And they're all very strongly consistent with the depictions. Even if the actual star arrangements are a little different, the, the, you know, the, what that entity is supposed to represent or what that symbology is supposed to represent is consistent. And so that would, you know, to me, suggests that that had to come from some sort of protocol culture that had a consistency. And then after it was fractured, you know, they tried to, with the resources that they had, because now all of your infrastructure is completely destroyed. They tried to reach refound society, but also at the same time, create a, you know, consistent symbology to try to explain the story, the human story as at work. Speaker 0 (16m 20s): Yeah. I think Vella Kowski has written quite a bit on this too. He talks about a people of the sea, which reminds me of, of, you know, that little bag, like quarto coddle carries it, the Egyptian pharaohs carry it. It seems to me like Maybe they hit up their own seed vault, wherever their seed vault was, and they're here. They are going and teaching people to, you know, to farm the land and teaching agriculture, which would be the first thing you do after a cataclysm. Right. And we have seed volts. Like we have that infrastructure, like, so it's not. And it just to add to that too, sometimes it seems to me that all this technology and the ideas they're, I, they're not original ideas that are ideas that people pick up on, whether it's a symbol, or if you listen to some of the greatest minds, they always say things like, oh, I heard a voice, or it was given to me, you know, and it seems like those symbols and those ideas have, have always been here. You know, I like what you said in the book too, about a river's route changes over time, and that change allows life to flourish. Why would our lives be any different? Explain that a little bit. Speaker 1 (17m 28s): Well, you know, and this goes into, as above. So below, like we mentioned a little bit before, but we have these systems all around us and these systems are, you know, even though we may not understand them at first observation, or even looking at them for 20 years, if you can view them from a, you know, an pull yourself back from a 10,000 foot perspective and look down at this thing, and then able to fast forward time at your will, you'd see a whole flourishing of, you know, life and death and regrown and all of these things. But along that pathway, there's a consistency of, you know, an ecosystem that's growing and evolve. And if you could stretch out even further and look down at humanity and in turn the time, dial up backward and forward, you would be able to see a similar pattern. We, you know, we're constantly ebbing and flowing with the river, multiple rivers as it were, but as the river of time, ultimately, and that cyclical nature plays into that. And it plays into everything that we observed. I mean, there's not a single system that you can observe that doesn't have a cyclical or a helical type nature to it. You know, even when we're talking about, you know, the smallest things like, you know, magnetic fields and things like that, you know, all of our electronics, they have spin. They have, you know, we have the toroidal fields around everything that we call magnets. We have toroidal fields that kind of encompass what our heliosphere is, what our solar system is, what, how, you know, the climate works on the planet. These are all can continual systems. And energy goes into these systems that north and south poles, there's a really interesting study from, you know, Neptune that went cold and then got hot. And you can actually see the heat radiate from the poles down Jupiter as well. And it's an induction from the sun. I mean, we got this giant ball of plasma up there generating, encountering, untold amounts of energy. It's really hard for humans to fathom these scales. Right. You know, for instance, at the equator, you're spinning a thousand miles an hour relative to the center of the earth. And then, you know, workers in about 67,000 miles an hour around the sun. And then the sun is cruising. You know, some like I think 227,000 miles an hour around the galactic plane, we don't even know what that is. Even though I just said the numbers, we can't envision that, you know, 60 miles an hour, things are going like this past the window. You know, you get to a hundred miles an hour and you feel like you've never moved faster in your life. We have no recollect, or we have no idea what a thousand miles are, let alone, you know, 27,000 miles an hour. And so our relative ability to understand these scales, I think really creates a big problem for a lot of people, especially if you don't have the time in life and all you can read is a headline because now relative to what's actually happening the scale of all this stuff, you know, people are like, they want to give you a personal carbon counter to count your carbon emissions. Whereas, you know, the idea that particulates in the atmosphere are governing this system that is so many orders of magnitude energetically, greater than you could pack the whole atmosphere with particulates. And you still wouldn't even scratch the surface that this is all the generator of everything is a really, to me I'm served no, you know, we have an in, we have a lot of evidence growing is just how absurd it is. But at the same time, you know, because of profits, mostly we're moving down a pathway where all of a sudden you're going to be counted for, you know, how often you, how often you pass gas and how many hamburgers you ate this week. Right. Which is, and, and so, you know, we have some, when we don't understand the scale of these things, we are very inclined to move down those pathways that are detrimental to us for one, but they remove us from that kind of ebb and flow of, of reality in nature and our, our relationship with nature. Speaker 0 (22m 17s): Yeah. I agree. I, I often think that the, the movement for, you know, some of the ridiculous climate change, people should be every breath you take, every breath, you we're going to charge you every breath you take, you Speaker 1 (22m 34s): Know, Speaker 0 (22m 36s): Like we don't do any studies on what the migration of the magnetic north pole does to climate. We don't do any studies on what space wind does. Like we don't the truth is we don't know. And I can understand that sometimes I think that the purpose of history and these type of cultural movements is to unite everybody, but they all, it never does. Like global warming is a beautiful idea. Like, Hey, let's all rally around. We all care about the planet we can get behind that. Kind of like, not if it's all bullshit, we can't because it's wrong. Speaker 1 (23m 9s): Well, that's the problem I think is, you know, we, and this is replete throughout society. Multiple levels is it's, Hey, look at this really good thing. And people say, well, heck you know, I'm a good person. So I like good things. But then, you know, the questions are never asked, who's doing a good thing. Who's, you know, where does the money actually go? Does the good thing actually happened a little kind of side. For instance, I started a nonprofit. And as I was going through all the details for the state of Colorado, it gets to align that it says you have to spend 5% of your declared charitable cause on your charitable cause per year, 5%. So, right. And then, you know, I know from, I went through our startup program thing and one of the startups in there was talking, I was working in a non-profit world, nonprofit worlds, 400 and some billion dollar business. Speaker 0 (24m 16s): Yeah. All the millionaires. They gave away all their money. They gave it away. They just gave it to themselves. Right. It's just a fancy way of not paying taxes. Speaker 1 (24m 23s): Right. And so all of a sudden, you know, if I only have to spend 5% of my declared, cause my goodness, my goodness. So that was just Colorado. I'm not, I'm not well-versed in all of that, but I mean, if that's one state, I can imagine they're all relatively similar because they're wanting to attract business and they want that tax money. Ultimately, even if these, you know, even if it's a tax-free charity, there's always that give kickbacks and that's, you know, that's a whole different rabbit hole. But so we, you know, we have all of these people who are pulling the strings and these declared groups and these causes and these spokes figures and all of this stuff, and it makes somebody feel good to be good. So they attach to these things in the meantime, there's other people who go look at well, who's actually pulling the shots. Who's calling the shots here. Who's, where's the money going? How's it being spent? Is there any long-term studies on, on benefits to this? Are there studies to the counter science? Are there, you know, how's all this working out. Most people don't have that time to go look at those things. Right? And so now they're subjected to headlines and propaganda and narratives and people who want to influence the world. And, and by and large, they're doing a really good job if you're objective about it. Speaker 0 (25m 49s): Yeah, absolutely. That's what happens when you have all the money and you have the, the power of media, it's such a powerful medium, which takes us full Bush, takes us right back to symbols. The idea that they can project a symbol into your living room when you're unconsciously watching or at specific times of the day where you, where they know your, you know, the rate at which you think, or what type of mood you're in and they can implant these ideas in you. It's, it's like a digital slavery almost, you know, in a weird sort of way. They've captured your mind in a weird sort of way Alex Jones was right. And that there's a war for your mind, you know? Speaker 1 (26m 29s): Well, I mean, they're absolutely, there always has been too, if we're looking at history, right. It's always, it's always the, the rulers trying to, if not placate, you know, subjugate their populaces respectively and it usually doesn't start out like that. It usually has benign beings. There's usually one person who's like, oh yeah, we're going to do great. The next generation. It usually falls out pretty consistently. So it's nothing new under the sun. The problem is, is that where we seem very inclined to want to repeat that cycle and tying this back to choice what we're talking about last time, you know, all of these things influence our are our relative choices, those symbols being injected into the room when you're feeling sad, or when you're feeling happy, they are, they are impacting what your potential, what your potential choices are. And you're not aware of it by and large, right? Sometimes you are because sometimes you're really engaged in focus, but most of the time you're not, you're, you know, we have the TV on, in the background, we have the radio on, in the background, an ad pops up in a YouTube video, you know, all of these things. And we know, you know, even though they don't like to admit it, all these companies are all tapped into these microphones. It's all being rammed through an algorithm you're being served up ads that are relevant to your, your experience and all of this other stuff, which on the surface, just like, again, all of these other ideas that sound good on the surface. Sure. This can be a fantastic thing. I would love to waste less time finding more relevant information and, and use that to better my life. Why not? I have more time to spend with family and friends and, and research and go do other things on the back. End of it. Again, who's pulling, who's pulling the trigger who's who is using this information, what are they using it for? And then, you know, we know that they sell it. Well, I didn't get a kickback for my information. I don't know about, you know, but I haven't seen a check from Google or apple or at and T or any of these other people who's blatantly sell the information whenever they can. In fact, it's a massive revenue stream for most of the stuff. Speaker 0 (28m 53s): Yeah. It, it reminds me of, of in some ways I like what you did with choice to me, you really laid out how it's not an absolute, it's not free will versus fate. It's both. And I, it reminds me, it kind of reminds me of that little Limerick that Alan Watts used to say that once was a man who said, damn four. It certainly seems that I am a being that moves in determinant grooves. I'm not even a bus, I'm a Tran, but that being said, I have the infographics of choice here and I want, maybe I thought I could bring them up and you could kind of walk people through it since we're on the idea of choice. Okay. So let's get to the, here's the book for everybody called No Absolutes, A framework for life. Just if get a chance go on there, the links will be down there. The books called No Absolutes. It's a framework for life it'll help. It'll help you make sense of a lot of questions. At least it did for me. So, okay. Let's get to here's here's we have for choice. Can you see that up on your side? Speaker 1 (29m 55s): I, I, I mean, I did create it, so I think I have a mental image of it, but it is pretty small on my screen there. Yeah. So, you know, the whole idea is how I see this grand tapestry of things is that there's an infinite sea of potentiality. As that potentiality moves closer and closer to reality, it becomes a set of probabilities. And as we move throughout our days, as we have the thoughts, we have speak the words we speak, make the choices we make that those probabilities fold down and reality is generated. And, you know, I, I like to, because a lot of people have deja VU experience. Right. And I, and I like to, you know, kind of use this to say, when you have all of those probabilities, you know, you're just one little movement away from, you know, taking a left or taking a right where the almost exact moment in time could have unfolded. It would have just been a little bit different. And we're kind of perceiving both of those at the same time. Now this gets into, you know, quantum physics a bit. And so they just redid the double slit experiment. You're familiar with the double slit experiment. Speaker 0 (31m 20s): Yeah. Where sometimes, yeah. Sometimes it's a wave. Sometimes it's a, a particle, but it just depends on who we're lying to. Right. Speaker 1 (31m 33s): Well, I think the way I kind of like to describe it is, is you're shooting electrons through two different slips. And on the back, there's a, there's a wall and where those electron hits that's called an interference pattern. And so when they noticed that the electrons would be almost traveling through both of the holes and then pick which one they were going to, and then they would, you know, the, the original experiment was it's a wave until there's an observation. And that observation collapses the wave form into a particle, similar to how kind of like a choice would collapse the probabilities into reality. They re they redid that experiment with neutrinos and they had a really, really sensitive setup. And they found that neutrinos were actually traveling through both slits at the same time. Wow. So, and then, you know, there would be an instant where one would completely just disappear and the other one was impacted detector, but they were able to detect the neutrino in both slits at the same time. So kind of folding back into how reality unfolds in, in my hypothesis here is, is that those probabilities that you see you get those, those deja VU, those are, those are right next to that sensor, right before it hits the sensor and is actually determined where it's going to be that observation effect it's both of them are still in the slit. Both of those probabilities of what could happen next are still a potential right in front of you. And then one of them happens and one of them doesn't, but our brains are these giant pattern recognition. And so it's always observing these patterns. And so sometimes, you know, at that pattern was close enough to how we compile reality, which there's an estimate I saw a long time ago. It takes some four seconds for us to kind of process reality. It's already happened. It's just kind of what are, you know, the, the function of our brain and it's the function of every brain. So we kind of all live on a pretty consistent reality, but that also gets into, you know, how, when you have very traumatic events or when your adrenaline starts pumping, we, we perceive these time dilations where time slows down in time. You know, it seems to almost stop sometimes or time speeds up whenever you're having fun. So there's, you know, there's related phenomenon, but from a physical level, this is how I see a physical reality kind of unfolding. And then after it unfolds, you know, our choice is reflected back out into the ether, if you will. And it interacts with all of the sea of potentiality falls into a category of the next probable moments. And then the next reality based upon our next choice and our next choice and our next choice and the Q and a, and the cumulative choices of everything in motion Speaker 0 (34m 51s): In your model, if we take it back one step in your model, what would the brain be like? The box that the slits are in? Like, how would that shape up? Speaker 1 (35m 2s): Well, the brain is going to, we're giant transceivers where, you know, we receive signals and we broadcasting them and, you know, various sets of brainwaves frequencies. What have you, those are, you know, well-documented, it's also well-documented that if you can induce those types of, of waves in the brain, you can induce sleep. You can induce, you know, lots of different types of physical phenomenon. So I think our brain is, you know, quantum at some, so it is picking up on this, but then it takes those signals and due to the structure of the brain then puts those signals and is kind of the, the collection detector at the, at the end of the experiment. So both. Yeah, Speaker 0 (35m 55s): Yeah, yeah. I was just going to take it there almost like if, if we can apply this model to us and, and, you know, part of the model is environment experience, per se perspective, thoughts and actions. And at the end of your explanation, you talked about how that reality ball goes out into the ether and then affects other choices and starts the process over again. It almost seems that the, and this tell me if this sounds crazy, but it seems to me that everything around us is also having a choice in some weird sort of way. Like we know that, you know, plants talk to each other and, and all these other life forms, talk to each other. Can your model be applied to the other forces of life out there? Speaker 1 (36m 39s): Oh, absolutely. I mean, that's all, that's all part of this interwoven tapestry of information, because everything that's in motion is, is impacting the next unfolding moment of reality. And you could call those choices. You know, sometimes we call them chemical reactions. Sometimes we call them pheromone. Sometimes we call them, you know, you know, acts of God, even, right. But all of these things that when they happen, they are going to be propelled out and they're going to influence all of the next happens of reality. Speaker 0 (37m 20s): Yeah. It, it, it brings me to a, another interesting jump-off point that takes us to psychedelics. I'm a huge fan of psychedelics. And I have found, at least for me in multiple people that I've talked to is there's this sort of communion with nature. If you take like even a small dose of mushrooms or most, most psychedelics, but for this particular argument, I'll use psilocybin on big dose of psilocybin. And if you, if you look back to the different tribes or indigenous people, you can see their connection with nature. And it seems to me that obviously plants can't speak English, but they can use different hormones and they can use different pheromones to communicate with each other. And when you're in a heightened state of awareness, I think you can pick up on those things. I think that in a weird sort of way, by consuming this type of, you know, chemical that is also present in plants in a weird sort of way, it gives you the ability to communicate with them. Is that just wacky? Or do you think that there's something to that? Speaker 1 (38m 21s): Oh, there's definitely something to it. You know, start with mushrooms, just themselves. It's the only thing that breeze oxygen and exhales carbon dioxide in the plant kingdom or fungus kingdom as it were, but you know what we can, we kind of consider mushrooms and kind of like plants, but they're actually much more similar to two mammals and, and this side of life than they are to the plant kingdom. And then you also have, so they have, are you familiar with Paul Stamets? I am, yes. So Paul's done some really interesting studies on, you know, just the effects of all the different mushrooms and whatnot, but also the effects on localized environments and fungus networks. The mycelium actually create a communication network under the ground between different species of plants and trees. And it's not just a communication at work. It's also a resource sharing network as they they'll share different resources throughout this, this fungal structure. So, and then when you fast forward that in humans, they've put people under FMRs when they're under, you know, psilocybin mushrooms or LSD and other psychoactive component. And they've actually detected novel pathways in the brain. So regions of the brain that typically aren't connected, all of a sudden they're connected. So now instead of your very, you know, your, your sensory data for your visual cortex, just hitting the visual cortex and being processed through that mechanism. Now, all of a sudden there's novel connections to your auditory complex. And so this is my idea. My hypothesis is this is where you get a lot of like synesthesia where people see colors here, you know, here, colors, things like that. But to your, to your point to your question, yeah, I think those connections are actually, you know, were giant transceivers in tennis. And so we're, we're receiving more information that sensory information is being processed in greater portions of our brain. And through that process, we are going to naturally pick up just more signals, more information, more data about our environment, about what's around us. You know, there's a lot of very interesting aspects of people having, you know, shared hallucination and not just, you know, all, I, I kind of saw something, but oh yeah, we all observed this thing clear as day. No question about it. Well, how could that happen? Well, you know, there, you could go into that pretty deep, but if you just look at those kind of bits of information, we just talked about if all of these novel connections are being made, it's going to be dictated and not just about the internal environment, but also the external environment. So all these people sharing the same external environment and this same, same abundance of information and being very attenuated to it, all, making their choices about how to proceed with this experience. Now, all of a sudden you have a symphony that starts to, to happen. You know, I, and then if we look at other cultures like a Sufi culture, for instance, they have this, this whirling dervish dance where they put themselves into a trance essentially, and it becomes a group event. So similar states can be, do, be induced without, you know, like a psychoactive substance, but we produce all those psych labs that psychoactive substances in our brain as well. Yeah. I'm five MEO, DMT, you know, seeps out of RPO glam. We have, you know, the ability, you know, we have all these serotonins and dopamine and norepinephrine and all these other things that when at high levels produce very interesting results and you can induce that via psychoactive substances. You can be, you know, extreme exercise. I've been wanting to train for an ultra marathon for a while, and I've gotten up to about 50 miles a week. And I'll tell you what, when you go on those big, long runs, it is, you know, people talk about the runner's high, but once you go on a really long run and you've really stressed your body, all of a sudden you get into just really hallucination. I mean, you know, people claim to see all sorts of stuff on some of these crazy 240 mile races. Speaker 0 (43m 9s): That is so crazy. This is a great point. Would you, you shared a story with me about psychedelics and running. Would you share that story with me and my audience? Sure. Thank you. Speaker 1 (43m 20s): Well, I decided one day down in the new Mexican desert with an open window of opportunities that I was going to have a bit of a vision quest and I was left to my own devices with a whole bunch of mushrooms. So I took the mushrooms and I was compelled to run. So I probably ate about five, six grams of mushrooms. And I just went out and started running. And all of a sudden I was, instead of the normal like hallucinatory state, I was in basically a flow state. My mind was working a million miles a second. My body was moving better than it ever did. I ended up running 30 some miles and getting sunburned that day. And then, you know, not that I woke up the next morning and everything heard of my body. And I was like, oh my goodness, what did I do to myself? You know, I had little water blisters, everything was sore. And so naturally I decided, well, let's do it again. See what happens Speaker 0 (44m 27s): Naturally Speaker 1 (44m 28s): Naturally. So I did it again. And to my surprise, as soon as I went out and started running, I felt great. The soreness started to go away. And all of a sudden I'm just running up Hills again and running around. And I did another 20 some miles. The second day, my water blisters popped. I was red as beat red as could be. And then the third day I woke up and I actually didn't feel bad. And so I said, well, naturally, let's do it again. And so I did it again, all told, I went through about announce a mushrooms or so in three days under the sun and a couple interesting takeaways, one, it allowed me to be very, very active with running and it put my, it reset my body. I went from being pretty overweight at the time to being able to just go out and run eight miles. And it's not a bad thing at all. And then I also don't get sunburnt anymore, which is fascinating. Speaker 0 (45m 35s): Fascinating. Speaker 1 (45m 37s): I had first heard of this from Paul Stamets. He had mentioned that on an epic mushroom dose down in the tropics or Mexico or something, he got sunburned and he hadn't been sunburned. And I was like, huh. And that was four years ago or so, and I have yet to encounter another summer. Speaker 0 (45m 56s): Wow. Speaker 1 (45m 58s): Yeah. Speaker 0 (45m 59s): It's, it's mind blowing to me to think about the potentials. There's a lot of, I can't think of the name of the book, but there's a book that talks about indigenous tribes in south America. Just all of a sudden they just do this, they just get up and then they'll go run like an ultra marathon and then they'll do it again. You know? So there's, there's plenty of evidence to support kind of a similar thing that happened to you. Have you, have you thought to yourself, man, maybe I should see if this was an anomaly or have you found some Guinea pigs to try it on or, or have you found a way to test out your theory? Speaker 1 (46m 35s): I have, I've performed a few mushroom ceremonies now for people and I was able to duplicate my results of, you know, just super energetic, not hallucinatory states, but flow states where, you know, you're able to accomplish just about anything you could imagine running up mountains and people who are out of shape or in less than great shape, you know, men, women. So yeah, it's a duplicatable process too, which I find fascinating as researcher and just somebody who is interested in human performance. Speaker 0 (47m 11s): Yeah. You know, it's, it's interesting to me that there are people out there who are skeptical about psychedelics, but it might be the, one of the only things in science that is definitely something that can be repeated. Like if you take X amount of mushrooms, you will have a trip. You know, you will have a thing. I was not aware. I've been aware of the feeling of clarity and visions and you know, almost different dimensions and the experiencing of time. But I have never attempted to try and push my body in a certain way. And I, I could see how it would work. It makes me, it makes me want to give it a whirl out there. It sounds fascinating. And I I've yet to read the part on statements where he about the sunburn and stuff like that, but there's plenty of evidence out there. It's a fascinating story. Speaker 1 (48m 3s): It was, it was on a Joe Rogan podcast. I think he mentioned it. Yeah. It's, it's a really fascinating thing because it does have a consistent duplicatable experience. And, you know, when you can, I mean, this is people who, you know, a couple of people who weren't really even able to walk all that well, where all of a sudden jogging up a mountain. So, you know, you could take any pharmaceutical drug in the world and you're not going to be able to do that. But the, the SIM the symbiotic nature of siliciden and the, in the human experience to me is clear as day now. I think there's also methods to that madness, right. People who are, you know, if you're just down in 12 grams of mushrooms and looking to go, you know, talk to whatever entity you have in your mind. Well, you know, there's something to be said about that. Sure. Because it is an experience, but I think, you know, much more to just everyday health longevity ability to, you know, beef, physical, adding in just a little bit of mushrooms combined with physical exercise and sunlight. It seems to be a very interesting recipe that I think definitely should be explored a lot more scientifically. And in through research, I think actually Paul just got a $60 million fundraise for his siliciden mushroom company. I think it's coming down the pike to, Speaker 0 (49m 53s): Yeah. I, it, it really makes sense if, if you look at the literature coming from these different siliciden experiments with PTSD or depression, and we take, we take those particular studies that most people have read, and we combine it with your, your ability to go from not being a runner at all, just to be being able to get up and go run. And we also add in the fact that it, it does end run around the default mode network and it changes these parts of the brain. Well that's I had a friend whose dad had a stroke and had to teach himself how to talk again. And the way that it was explained to me was like, okay, he had a stroke. So, you know, Broca's area or something was damaged, but if you practiced and he focused and he got, he found a way to talk again, to do an end run around that part of the brain. Well, mushrooms are already kind of doing that. They're if, if they are, you know, lighting up different centers and allowing for different connections to be made, it would make sense that you could get over depression. You could get over PTSD, you could move your arm again. You could go run, you could get over all of these things because you were engaging parts of the brain that help your body act in a certain way. And it's that mind, body connection that's maybe being healed or, or being connected for the first time in a long time or something like that. It's fascinating to think about. Speaker 1 (51m 15s): I agree. I, you know, I think, I think the demonization of those things is getting close to an end at the same time. It's going to be an uphill battle too, because once you start to, you know, sadly all of this comes back around to profit and money. Speaker 0 (51m 36s): Yeah. Speaker 1 (51m 38s): Why would, why would it, why would companies who are making billions of dollars in treatments want to find a cure for something? Speaker 0 (51m 50s): Yeah. There's no, there's nothing there Speaker 1 (51m 52s): You, right. I mean, yeah. You know, the people who are genuine healers and want good for people. Yeah. We all want the cure for something, but once again, you know, these good ideas who's behind him, who's, who's pulling the strings of what's their motivation. And I think that's, you know, we'll probably cycle back around to that often because that's just the state of our society right now. Is it not? Speaker 0 (52m 18s): Yeah, yeah. It is. It's you can see it happening right now. Like, I, I like to follow a lot of the companies and the people that are, I like to read the study to see what's happening. And it seems to me there's a pretty big divide beginning to happen in the world, especially of silicide, but, and it's like, we want to patent this particular way. We want to set and setting and you shouldn't be able to be a healer. You should come in for treatments, you know, and some people are like, you just need it once and learn how to do it yourself. And then that's the beauty of it, you know? And, but you can see that fight happened and you can see almost the level of greed and selfishness beginning to creep in under the guise of healing. It's a little sinister, Speaker 1 (52m 60s): The same thing happened with marijuana. Right. Speaker 0 (53m 2s): Right. Speaker 1 (53m 3s): And if you look at, if you look at the scope of the marijuana business, by and large, all of the people who are local farmers and all of these things have been pushed out of the business, you know, state regulations are so cumbersome for a lot of these people when it comes to testing and labeling and all this stuff that, you know, has been put in, put into play by the states that there's only a handful of companies who can actually pay to play. And I think, you know, everything runs that risk in our society, any, just because of the nature and the structure of how things are built. The reality of the situation is, is that the richest people are getting excessively richer while most everybody else is continuing to get poorer and poorer on a relative scale. And that's, that's just because of the structure of society that we have. You know, it's always geared towards making a dollar for one. And then whenever there is a great novel idea or a solution or a potential cure or anything like this, it always becomes commoditized, regulated, patented. And before, you know, it, the, you know, the it's, it becomes a double-edged sword. And the edge that you're getting is the edge that you really don't want. Speaker 0 (54m 38s): That's funny. Yeah. It's could you imagine if the wheel was patent like, okay, no one else can use this. You know what I mean? Speaker 1 (54m 48s): Well, you know, that happened in the tech world, pretty, pretty heavily there's patent trolls out there who are like, oh no, you can't send an electronic message without paying me money. So, you know, and those, those lawsuits are still happening today with all sorts of different things that it's all a nightmare, one in the patent process. And then, especially when you combine that with, you know, oh, we're just going to offshore it and ship it out to somebody who's going to steal the IP anyway and release a product for a fraction of the cost. Well, I mean, there's that old adage, you get what you pay for, but the whole patent process on it in and of itself is limiting to people. It, it empowers corporations and limits ingenuity in my personal opinion. Speaker 0 (55m 40s): Yeah. It just seems like, you know, imagine if everybody, if, if somebody came up with a great idea and then other people could make that idea better without any consequences, I think everybody would be better off. I don't have any patents. So maybe this is just some guy talking and complaining. He doesn't have patents, but it seems to me like there's a lot of great ideas out there that if we're allowed, could be built upon by other great people and it would just make our world better. That brings me to another slide. I'm sorry, go ahead. Speaker 1 (56m 11s): Well, I was going to say, and that's, you know, that's really kind of the, the advent of open source technology out in the world and, and it holds true. I mean, you know, because of open source technology, we've incredible, you know, programs and systems and things like blockchain technology and all this other stuff come out until the wide world with the potential to really change the world. So you're exactly right in your statement. Speaker 0 (56m 41s): Yeah. I, I think that's, I think what we're talking about is the breaking free of change. I think that that's why the world is in such chaos right now, because you can't put that genie back in the bottle, whether it's cryptocurrency or whether it's different types of energy, or whether it's the Meg shifting magnetic north pole, that's allowing people to wake up or where we are in space or as the age of Aquarius. Maybe it's all of these things combined, but like, that's what gets me excited is that I can see a different level of freedom being born and just, just you and I talking just the fact that we got to meet up and we've begun having this relationship and talking about things that we both have in common. We both find interesting. We're both being rewarded and we're on different parts of the planet. And there's freedom I think, is being born. And the children that are born today are going to be subjected to ideas and, and freedoms that our grandparents could only dream of. Speaker 1 (57m 44s): Absolutely. And on the other side of the fence trials and tribulations Speaker 0 (57m 50s): Yes. Speaker 1 (57m 52s): You know, again, I think looking at the system from a very objective and very large view, you know, we have a broken system at scale. We have, you know, it's, you know, from the top down the everybody's bought and paid for at some level of the game, you can't, you know, just because it costs so much money to play that game, you know, I've, I've been born witness to certain instances that I've heard others, but, you know, I've, I saw a person running for a local seat lose. And then what did they do? I was talking to him two weeks after the fact and all of a sudden, you know, they got a hundred thousand dollar offer for their next campaign so long as they decided to, you know, toe the line, so to speak, never heard from that person again, but they wonder next campaign. Speaker 0 (58m 51s): Imagine that. Speaker 1 (58m 53s): So, you know, that's kind of when you have that substructure, because, you know, at the root level structure kind of dictates what happens at the substructure dictates what happens at reality level, like the color of your eyes, for instance, color of your eyes is because the structure in there doesn't absorb the color of light that's reflected back. You know, so the substructures of how built have a grand grand influence on the final result, the end product. And when you have a system that you know, was designed to represent the will of the people in the west, and you have on top of that, another system that allows anybody to pay just about any amount. If you pull the right strings and cross the right eyes or dot their I's across right teeth, then all of a sudden you have a conflict. Well, who wins in that conflict, we know who wins money wins in that conflict, just because of the way that the world exists. And now all of a sudden money's pulling all of the strings. So who are those people with the money? What is their intent? What, why are they pulling the strings? It completely corrupts the process that's in place for one, but worse. It limits all of the future options to have these ideas, like an open source thing and limiting these patent protections and stuff. So we could actually have, like, you know, 3d printing is a great example. They used to call rapid prototyping machines because that was the, that was the path. The day that that patent finally expired was the day that 3d printers were born into the world. And the 3d printers are a fantastic tool where you have all these open source communities, making all of these CAD designs, people, making adjustments to them and wonderful prototyping is happening for all sorts of different, really cool things out there. And then because now I can have a $500 3d printer and I can stand on the shoulders of all these giants without having to cut red tape and jump over walls. All of a sudden I can experiment in my house and how many genius ideas are, you know, there used to be the old, it was born in the garage and then was a billion dollar company. And that was kind of the nineties Google story, right? You don't hear those stories anymore. Nothing's born in the garage anymore. The barrier to entry to all of these things has become so prohibited. And it stays prohibitive because the people who have already entered, they make a lot more money by keeping it prohibitive. And, you know, so we're, we're stuck in a bit of a catch 22 when it comes to that. But to your point, we also have this global communication. We have this abilities that we've never had before to have conversations, to actually, you know, take these ideas, flush them out, find like-minded people and to impact change. I feel, Speaker 0 (1h 2m 11s): Yeah. It brings me back to your book. Like, you know, you, you get into the, you both talk about fractals and you also elude to them and you make different examples that helped me to see the world different. And I'll give you an example of what, I mean, first off, I'll start with, there was a quote, I forgot who said it, but it was something along the lines of, you can see the entire universe in a grain of sand. And I think that we can see ourselves in other structures and it is fractal. You gave in your book, you gave the idea about how our lives are like the changing course of a river. And if you look, if you look at mankind as a river, it's flooding because, because there are these dams, there are these prohibitive rules and regulations are like dams on this river. But if you look at what's happening in the Netherlands right now, all these tractors like, oh, you're not going to let us farm. Okay. And we're going to block everything. It seems to me that the, like the pop you, the populous revolts that are happening around the world, whether it was the food cart, gentlemen in Tunisia, or the yellow vests in France, or the BLM here, or whatever label you want to put on it, it seems like there's this upswell of energy. This wa UpSpring of water that is about to flood over everything. And like the people in positions of authority like, oh no, the dam is about to break. But that's the idea that I, one of the ideas I get by reading your book is seeing the world as, or humankind as a floating river to see, see each one of us as our own little raindrop, that's eroding down the side of the mountain and following a path that water has gone before us. And I, I, I want to say thank you for that. Like, it helped me see the world differently. I really appreciate that. Is some, is that something that you had in mind when you were writing the book? Speaker 1 (1h 4m 13s): Yeah, it was. So, you know, you had mentioned last time about how a lot of this seemed original. You haven't read it anywhere. I would say a lot of reason for that is because I didn't, I didn't go down a traditional path. I didn't read every philosophy book before I decided to write something about philosophy. In fact, I read none of them pretty much. And, and it was all derived from personal experience, really on top of my, you know, research and passion for all sorts of different systems, you know, how, how the world works, how the human body works, how ecosystems work, all of that. And then combining it with, you know, really the underlying, how, how things work at, at just the general scale. I got to the point where, you know, I was able to just envision that, you know, and once you can see it, I think you can test it. You can kind of see it everywhere. And it just becomes this ubiquitous perspective that you can now harness to look at the world in a little bit of a different way. And that little bit of a different way has been exceptionally beneficial to me, not just to understand the world and pick apart what's happening, but how to deal with that on an emotional level, on a personal level. I mean, if you look at a lot what's going on right now, people are in a state of hysteria. You know, for years, the past couple of years they've been locked down. Everything that was good has been turned bad in one relative perspective or another, depending on where you are in the world and what your, your feelings towards a situation are. And on top of that, now you're now you're, it's one crisis after another. Well, if you don't deal with these things psychologically, if you don't have a mechanism, a process in understanding of the world, a way to dissect and view this at a healthy level, you're, we're, we're seeing it. You have, you have people who are falling off the rails, you have an uptake or mass shootings. You have all sorts of craziness and crazy responses that are overblown responses to things that people don't even understand what they're responding to. They're simply reacting because that's the only thing that you can do in this state of hysteria is just react. So you know, that from just a big general level, without having that ability to see that flow of humanity, to see the, how, you know, the different perspectives of how reality is driven to, to be able to understand this information, you're going to be lost a wash in that, in that river. And you're in, you're going to be stuck up against the dam and the pressure is going to build, and the pressure is going to build, and there will be a problem. The dam will break your, your little existence will be completely overwashed by the rush of the, the other, you know, the whole world essentially. And I think without having these conversations without, you know, reason being brought back in on the, to the table, we end up in a very, very detrimental and deleterious and dangerous state. Speaker 0 (1h 7m 49s): Yeah. It's that was really well put really well done. It, it makes me think that in, in, in your story, you use people being washed up against a dam and being caught. That seems to me a lot, like absolute thinking. Like if you're, if you have these absolutes and you're just washed up against this wall, and that's exactly what your book does, ladies and gentlemen, it's called No Absolutes. And here's why it's awesome. If you look at where we're at today, I have found. And I think if you get the bus book and read this book, you too will come to the conclusion that if you just take away the absolute, you take away that wall and you have this ability to, oh, well, maybe that's not true. In fact, that's probably not sure what about this? It's freeing, it's liberating. And I, I want to take us to another slide because I would really, really want to get your opinion on this one here. So, but it blows my mind to think about No Absolutes. And I, I know I keep saying it, but it's, it's awesome. I, I really appreciate the, the way that yeah. I think most people will. Can you check, can you tell us a little about this slide? Speaker 1 (1h 8m 56s): Yeah. So this is the logo of the book, and the idea is, you know, a framework, I'm not going to be able to see those because I am blind at a distance here, but you know, I'll start with the center because I know what that one is and it's balanced. And so, you know, at the center of all this stuff is, you know, it's very important and it just kind of tapers onto what we were just talking about is you need to find a balance and in order to find a balance, well, first you have to have a foundation that you can stand on. If you're standing in quicksand really hard to find some balance. However, if you can create a perspective of the world that gives you a solid foundation, not one that is absolute, but one that's a morphous. And one that changes as you gain more evidence, as you have more experiences, as you look at different perspectives, then you have a, a foundation that you can establish a state of balance. And being in a state of balance is, you know, people talk about it from multiple different perspectives and have methodologies about it and there's meditations and all of this. But I think fundamentally, most people understand what balance is and you don't need to get too metaphysical with it, to really kind of convey the idea that when you are balanced and when you can imagine yourself in life being balanced, while everything really moved along at a much more harmonious and synchronous pays, you know, you were happier. The, the past that you went down were more fruitful, you know, your relationships improve. It's when we get off kilter, when we let things affect us and we lose that balance is all of a sudden when we start to, you know, have very negative emotions, get angry, feel depressed, all of these types of, you know, what are mostly called mental, mental health disorders these days, which, you know, there's a lot to be said about that. But again, if we're looking at that as a perspective, it's going to be, you know, you have to take the totality of everything. Where does that all come from? It's an environmentally driven thing combined with a, a genetic thing. And, you know, just like setting the setting can, you know, change somebody from, you know, walking through hell on a trip or walking through a Disney movie, little fluffy jungle, those, you know, that perception of, of where we're at in life and, and how we got there is, you know, can very much impact our experience of reality. And then, you know, the tools around it, the points around it, we're just kind of little axioms that I've kind of just uncovered in my life. Or, you know, somebody said to me at random or something like that, like accept gifts with grades, which doesn't seem, you know, it's pretty innocuous. But when you really get into that, there is a lot to be said about that, because why does somebody give you something? Somebody gives you something because, you know, despite everything else that's happening in the world, despite all of their, you know, relationships, all of their dramas, all of this stuff, they thought of you and have the intention of giving you something to not honor that, to not accept that with grace is going to not only make that person feel bad, but not, you're not going to have the proper perspective of the gift. Now, how does that influence the future choice of both you and the person giving the gift? Well person giving the gifts, going to be less likely to give gifts and you as the receiver? Well, you're not bettering yourself by being aware that other people are thinking about you in this way. And so you're limiting your choices in the future of how you're going to act and operate in any given. Go ahead. Speaker 0 (1h 13m 19s): I, it's awesome. It's in, I'm going to read it just a couple other ones. Cause I, I wanna, I want to say something after I read some of the other ones and it's be aware don't prejudge, choose your words. Wisely. Truth is relative. Seek out new information mentioned, focus on the change that you can make, all things change, reflect, and I'm for those of the, for people that might just be listening. It's an incredible diagram. That's, there's a cube and inside the cube is a triangle. And then there's a line for balance. And what I want people who are watching this and listening to this to understand is the relevance

'The pastoral loves of Daphnis and Chloe'by LongusUsage Public Domain Mark 1.0#Creative #Commons #License#publicdomainTopics #librivox, #audiobooks, #romance, #Greek, #AncientLibriVox recording of The pastoral loves of Daphnis and Chloe by Longus. (Translated by #GeorgeMoore.)Read in English by #Anamika; #Rapunzelina; #BonitaDominguez#Daphnis and #Chloe is an #Ancient #Greek #prose #work, probably written during the second century EC, by #Longus. It tells the #story of two #young #people, Daphnis and Chloe, both #abandoned at birth along with some #identifying tokens. A #goatherd named #Lamon raises the boy #Daphnis as his son, and a shepherd called #Dryas finds #Chloe, and also decides to raise her. They both grow up as neighbors herding the flocks in the island of #Lesbos. They #fall in #love with each other, but have to go through many #adventures and #hardships, including #abduction and #pirate attacks, until they find their happy ending. (Summary by #Leni)Search our data bass https://www.listennotes.com/podcasts/tale-teller-kidstm-tale-teller-club-1Xgre0P-Ukh/ Have some fun with our new show Immersionwww.tale-teller.clubSearch our database herehttps://www.listennotes.com/podcasts/tale-teller-kidstm-tale-teller-club-1Xgre0P-Ukh/#searchGet immersed in words and video here www.tale-teller.club/immersion#story #freeaudio #freebooks #storytelling #taletellerclub #immersion #interactive #classicnovel #classics #history #historic #familyfriendly#costume #perioddrama #historicfiction #pasttimes #oldendays #traditional #historic #dramatic #filmic #goldenera #fashiondrama #costumedrama #history

'The pastoral loves of Daphnis and Chloe'by LongusUsage Public Domain Mark 1.0#Creative #Commons #License#publicdomainTopics #librivox, #audiobooks, #romance, #Greek, #AncientLibriVox recording of The pastoral loves of Daphnis and Chloe by Longus. (Translated by #GeorgeMoore.)Read in English by #Anamika; #Rapunzelina; #BonitaDominguez#Daphnis and #Chloe is an #Ancient #Greek #prose #work, probably written during the second century EC, by #Longus. It tells the #story of two #young #people, Daphnis and Chloe, both #abandoned at birth along with some #identifying tokens. A #goatherd named #Lamon raises the boy #Daphnis as his son, and a shepherd called #Dryas finds #Chloe, and also decides to raise her. They both grow up as neighbors herding the flocks in the island of #Lesbos. They #fall in #love with each other, but have to go through many #adventures and #hardships, including #abduction and #pirate attacks, until they find their happy ending. (Summary by #Leni)Search our data bass https://www.listennotes.com/podcasts/tale-teller-kidstm-tale-teller-club-1Xgre0P-Ukh/ Have some fun with our new show Immersionwww.tale-teller.clubSearch our database herehttps://www.listennotes.com/podcasts/tale-teller-kidstm-tale-teller-club-1Xgre0P-Ukh/#searchGet immersed in words and video here www.tale-teller.club/immersion#story #freeaudio #freebooks #storytelling #taletellerclub #immersion #interactive #classicnovel #classics #history #historic #familyfriendly#costume #perioddrama #historicfiction #pasttimes #oldendays #traditional #historic #dramatic #filmic #goldenera #fashiondrama #costumedrama #history

( To see the video of this show, click here: https://youtu.be/cC34GxXq1Zs ) Cristina's Instagram, Facebook, YouTube, Twitter and More > https://beacons.page/cristinagomez Patreon Club for Extras & Behind the Scenes: https://www.patreon.com/paradigm_shifts NEW information and some latest findings are discussed in this livestream episode of Mysteries with a History. Cristina Gomez and Jimmy Church look into the enigmatic ancient mystery of Göbekli Tepe that has sent shocks through mainstream Archeology and History establishments globally. GÖBEKLI TEPE REALITY SHOCK - Mysteries with a HistoryWhen looking at the development of Human civilization over the millennia, we can reasonably and logically expect to see a steady incline of progression. This has been a staple concept of established academic thought. The discovery of the 11,000 plus year old Göbekli Tepe on a Turkish mountaintop 25 years ago has turned that concept on it's head, as in fact when looking across the world archeologically it appears that there was a decline in skills and knowledge when comparing the level of sophistication of the people of Göbekli Tepe to the time period afterwards, before the rise of the first known ancient civilizations. Many academics and researchers are now asking if the makers of Göbekli Tepe were the remnants of an even older and more sophisticated civilization predating the Younger Dryas period nicknamed Civilization One. One such notable researcher and author is Graham Hancock who has written and spoken at length about a technology transfer between a remnant of Civilization One and the hunter gatherers of that area in ancient Turkey.Other theories include the assertion that Civilization One were the residents of Atlantis going even further back in time. As excavations have progressed over the last quarter century, it has become increasingly evident that man possessed skills in craftmanship and stonemasonry as well as concepts of civilized culture during an epoch of time that contradicts all notions we have about the progress of history. Excavations are still ongoing and many amazing discoveries are not getting the press exposure that they deserve, and the site keeps teasing with many more revelations to come. Some theories indicate the site could of been an ancient temple while others allude to it being an ancient astronomical observatory. The name Göbekli Tepe translates from Turkish as Potbelly Hill and spans an area of 20 acres plus. The sandy mud has been excavated to reveal many stone circles. On its oldest level, there are circular compounds⁠ ranging anywhere from ten to thirty meters in diameter. Within the stone circles are stunning features such as monolithic T-shaped stones that weigh up to fifty tons, which possess intricate sculptures of animal among other things.

2021 was a big year in science! Fossil discoveries introduced new relatives to our family tree, new findings added fascinating twists to the human story, and breakthroughs in research methods opened new worlds to explore. In this episode, five scientists discuss their favorite human origins discoveries of 2021. Click here for a transcript of this episode. Our guests: Scott A. Williams, New York UniversityJessica Thompson, Yale UniversityGiulia Gallo, University of California at DavisFernando Villanea, University of Colorado at BoulderErin Kane, Boston University Read more about their top discoveries: Dragon Man Late Middle Pleistocene Harbin cranium represents a new Homo species  Stunning ‘Dragon Man' skull may be an elusive Denisovan—or a new species of human 'Dragon man' claimed as new species of ancient human but doubts remain  SedaDNA Unearthing Neanderthal population history using nuclear and mitochondrial DNA from cave sediments Bacho Kiro Initial Upper Palaeolithic humans in Europe had recent Neanderthal ancestry Early Homo sapiens groups in Europe faced subarctic climates Like Neanderthals, Early Humans Endured a Frigid Europe White Sands footprints Evidence of humans in North America during the Last Glacial Maximum Ancient Footprints Push Back Date of Human Arrival in the Americas National Park Services White Sands Website Camera trap research on Dryas monkeys A natural history of Chlorocebus dryas from camera traps in Lomami National Park and its buffer zone, Democratic Republic of the Congo, with notes on the species status of Cercopithecus salongo  Using local knowledge and camera traps to investigate occurrence and habitat preference of an Endangered primate: the endemic dryas monkey in the Democratic Republic of the Congo- Picture Perfect: Camera Traps Find Endangered Dryas Monkeys  The Leakey Foundation Origin Stories is a project of The Leakey Foundation, a nonprofit organization dedicated to funding human origins research and outreach. This month, thanks to Jorge and Ann Leis and the Ann and Gordon Getty Foundation, all donations will be quadruple-matched. Click here to make a donation! Credits This episode was hosted and produced by Meredith Johnson and Ray Pang. Our editor is Audrey Quinn.  Music by Henry Nagle and Lee Roservere. Additional music by Blue Dot Sessions. Please send us your questions! Have a question about human evolution? Something you've always wondered about? We will find a scientist to answer it on a special episode of Origin Stories! There are three ways to submit your question: Leave a voicemail at +1(707)788-8582 Visit speakpipe.com/originstories and leave a message Record a voice memo on your phone and email it to us at originstories@leakeyfoundation.org Lunch Break Science Lunch Break Science is The Leakey Foundation's web series featuring short talks and interviews with Leakey Foundation grantees. Episodes stream live on the first and third Thursdays of every month. Sign up for event reminders and watch past episodes at leakeyfoundation.org/live

We are joined this week by friend of the show Kyle Delisle. We met Kyle on the trip we took to the channeled scablands in Washington State earlier this year with Randall Carlson. Kyle is a Native American of the Iroquois, of the Mohawk nation, and he has been researching Iroquois traditions, legends, and mythology regarding the creation of the world, the creation of humans, giants, and other strange beings that were said to exist long ago.Kyle tells us about the formation of the Iroquois Confederacy, and the possible travels of the ancestors of his people. We read and discuss some of their stories and traditions about encounters with giants. We talk about their detailed creation stories, and speculate on the possibility that some of the symbolism in the traditions may be referring to constellations, and past catastrophes, especially the Younger Dryas period. All in all, a fascinating and illuminating conversation!

Une entrevue sur la transmissibilité des variants, avec Nicolas Doucet; les détails de la théorie de l'impact cosmique du Dryas, avec Alexandre Touchette; des explications sur l'origine des médailles de bronze, avec Yannick Bergeron; une chronique sur la vie secrète des plantes, avec Simon Joly; des éclaircissements sur la signature génétique d'une épidémie du passé, avec Renaud Manuguerra; une chronique sur la couleur jaune, avec Mélissa Guillemette; un entretien sur la fusion de trous noirs et d'une étoile à neutrons, avec Frédérique Baron; un reportage sur l'Atlas climatique du Canada, avec Gino Harel.

Between 1972 and 1973, in modern-day Syria, archaeologists began an excavation of what they originally thought was an ancient farming village located in the Euphrates valley in an area known as Tell Abu Hureyra. The scientists were surprised to discover that there was another settlement from the Paleolithic era buried underneath the remains of the later settlement. Archaeologists were able to determine that the earlier village had been a society of hunter-gatherers who had perhaps settled in the valley more than 12,000 years ago. Around that same time period is when scientists have studied and determined there had been a dramatic climate shift that actually seemed to halt the Earth's exit from its last Ice Age. Even more fascinating, is that a new study of the soil and artifacts found at Abu Hureyra, revealed the settlement had been obliterated by a fragment of a comet. This finding seems to support the relatively new theory that this unusual climatic event may have been the result of a single or even multiple extraterrestrial impacts. Impacts that may have resulted in, as some academics believe, the destruction of a highly advanced human culture that existed prior to the event. This case file, join the Theorists as they trade in their Older two-door Dryas to get their hands on the newer, sleeker, and more spacious model of...The Younger Dryas Everything ATT here: https://linktr.ee/alientheoristspodcast --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/alientheoriststheorizing/message

Justin is joined by host of the Alchemical Mind Podcast, Martin Ferretti to discuss, mindfulness, normalizing perceived taboos, simulation Vs. simulacrum, the Younger Dryas cataclysm and lots more! Join us! It's not a cult, but it is occult. The Alchemical Mind The Alchemical Mind Twitter

In this special COVID-19 episode of the BG Ideas podcast, we talk with Dr. Lori Liggett, who researches popular images from the women's suffrage movement. Liggett is a Teaching Professor in the School of Media and Communication and a Spring 2020 Faculty Fellow.   Announcer : From Bowling Green State University and the Institute for the Study of Culture and Society, this is BG ideas. Musical Intro: I'm going to show him this with a wonderful experiment. Jolie: Welcome to the Big Ideas podcast, a collaboration between the Institute for the Study of Culture and Society, and the School of Media and Communication at Bowling Green State University. I'm Dr. Jolie Sheffer, Associate Professor of English and American Culture Studies, and the Director of ICS. This is a special episode of the podcast, which we are recording during the COVID-19 pandemic. That means we're not in the studio, but are talking via phone and computer. Our sound quality will be different as a result. Jolie: But now more than ever, I thought it was important to share with you some of the amazing work being done by members of the BGSU community. Even, or especially when conditions are challenging, we need to recognize and celebrate great ideas. As always the opinions expressed on this podcast are those of the individuals involved, and do not necessarily represent those of BGSU or its employees. Today I'm speaking with Dr. Lori Ligate, a Senior Lecturer at BGSU in the School of Media and Communication who's teaching and research focus on gender and visual culture. She's a spring of 2020 ICS faculty fellow who is doing public scholarship focused on images of womanhood in popular media during the era of women's suffrage. I'm really pleased to get to talk with you today, Lori. Thank you for being flexible and joining me, virtually. Lori: Thank you. I appreciate it. Jolie: To start off, could you tell us a little bit about how you got interested in studying the era of women's suffrage? And what have been some of the more interesting and surprising directions that this research has led you? Lori: Right. Well, basically I got involved in studying the suffrage movement about 25 years ago, and it wasn't my original intent. I was studying women's service magazines of the late 19th century. Women's service magazines are things like Godey's Ladies Book, which was one of the first one. Then you segue into things like Good Housekeeping. Lori: I was interested in motherhood, domesticity from a sociopolitical point of view. As I was doing decades of looking at literally every issue of Good Housekeeping, I started seeing this pivot from talking about new household technologies, and cooking procedures and new techniques for mothers, and into more political stuff. And immediately I was hooked. And of course, I knew a little bit about the suffrage movement, but I hadn't seen it within that context. And it shocked me, because there were actual literary essays that would appear in the service magazines. Lori: I also started seeing it in advertising, just references were popping up everywhere. And when I really got into it was probably around the, I would say, 1908, 1910 issues. When you started seeing, and remember this as Good Housekeeping, references to militarism, to women becoming militant, to radicalism. Now, this is Good Housekeeping. I guarantee you, if you were to go to the newsstand today and pick up a Good Housekeeping, you would not see anything on radicalism and militancy. I was shocked. Lori: This was largely due to what was going on in Great Britain at the time. And a leader in Great Britain, one of the leaders, is the famous or infamous Emmeline Pankhurst. And the British movement had become militant at that point. We started to see the beginnings of that in the American suffragist movement. I just never imagined I would see it in Good Housekeeping. So that's the origins of it. Jolie: And what were some of the elements of your research that surprised you most? You said that the language of militancy, but what about some of the visual iconography? Lori: Well, I expanded from there over the last 25 years, I guess I would consider myself a media scholar, but I really focus on visual culture and visual communication. I've always been attracted to the images of things. When I study media, I'm interested in mediated images. And so I was already studying advertising. Lori: This was a long way to get to the bicycling stuff that I'm doing now, but I am a fanatic about the art nouveau movement, which was late 1880s, at full steam in the 1890s, less popular, but still very prevalent up until the start of World War I. I started seeing images of women in advertising that was very much art nouveau style, but would have a political element. In a lot of those images, I noticed that they were using the bicycle. And so you would see women on bicycles, advertising everything from soap to cigars, to carpeting, to flour. Things that had nothing to do with bicycling, but you would see a woman and a bicycle. Lori: I was just fascinated by that. And I started collecting images of women on bikes. Basically, what I was doing, I was downloading JPEGs, and just keeping an archive, trying to figure out what to do with it. At some point, I would say probably in the 1970s, definitely by the eighties, and certainly the nineties and throughout, you started to see more scholarship on the suffrage movement that wasn't what we would call traditional history. Lori: I was a grad student in the nineties, and so looking at material culture and the sociopolitical angle of political culture, it sort of brought everything together for me. So we've got these visual images, we've got advertising, we've got women's politics, we've got for some reason the bicycle, which I didn't understand at that point. And really a couple of decades later, it leads me to the project that I'm working on now. Jolie: Tell us a little bit about some of that research, and what have you discovered was the role or the purpose of all of that focus on the bicycle? What is the connection to women's voting, and changing women's rights? Lori: I had to backtrack and learn a lot about bicycle history. I'm certainly not an expert, but I know a lot more about bicycle history than I did, let's say nine months ago, let's put it that way. And so the bicycle itself is just a fascinating global phenomenon. Today we would look at a bicycle and almost all of us, regardless of gender, of where you live in the world, the bicycle has been part of your life at some point. There's reason for that, which is that the bicycle represents the first device that permitted human beings to self mobilize. Lori: In the 1600's, there are images of people on these things that kind of look like a bike. People were imagining something along those lines. But it takes until about, I think the date is 1817, and you have a German guy, his name was Karl Von Drais, or Dryas probably. He developed this thing called a running machine. Now what was the running machine? They were also called hobby horses, or dandy horses. Another name based on his name was a Draisine. What it was is it was something that looked like a bicycle, two wheels. There was a plank that you would sit on. Lori: You would straddle it, sit on it. And then with your feet, almost like Fred Flinstone, you would move it along. It took decades of improvements until you get to the 1860s. And you have something that the French developed, which was called the boneshaker. The boneshaker was called that because it was incredibly hard on the cyclist's body. Lori: At the time these devices would have been made out of wood and steel. The tires, there was no tire the way we think of it. The wheels were made out of iron or steel. And so if you wrote it, it was just shaking every bone in your body, so it was called the boneshaker. And there was a woman's version, which was called the tricycle. They develop these three-wheel devices, extremely heavy, extremely expensive, not to be ridden in public. But only wealthy women who had private space, so garden space, would ride a tricycle. It said that Queen Victoria had a couple of them. And they were pretty popular amongst the wealthy. But you did not see women riding a tricycle out in public spaces. Jolie: Well, so fast forward a little bit to how does that get associated? How do these new technologies and improvements to this, get associated with ordinary middle-class and working-class women? Lori: It's interesting you say ordinary because the bicycle, the one we think of with the big wheel and the little back wheel, that was actually called the ordinary. And that was developed in the 1870s. It was called a high wheel or an ordinary, and it was considered an improvement on the boneshaker because it was light and it was fast. It was extremely difficult to maneuver. Riding schools were set up. Lori: But you actually had women, particularly in the beginning, French women who started almost performing on these high wheelers. They would come to the United States and perform as almost circus acts. And they were working women. They were women who were not from the upper classes. They tended to wear clothing that was considered back then a little scanty. And they were seen really as spectacle, as an oddity. Lori: In the late 1880s, you have something developed that's called the safety. The safety is really the progenitor of the bicycle today. And almost immediately due to a guy in American named Albert Pope, he imported the safety. He bought all the patents for it, and he started marketing like crazy. And Americans started buying the safety. Just a couple of years of the safety coming to the United States, bike manufacturers started doing something they called the drop frame so that women could get on to the bike. Lori: Women took to it like crazy. And in the 1890s, you have something that was called the bicycle craze. And it truly was this phenomenon. I don't want to bore you with details. But just to give you an example in 1885, you had six bicycle manufacturers in the United States, just six, and they were producing about 11,000 bikes a year. In 1895, there were 125 manufacturers. They were producing a half a million bikes a year. A year later, it was a million bikes. Lori: What happened is, oftentimes the bike is seen as this great democratic equalizer of the classes and gender. We had all these social reform movements. By the 1890s, the women's suffrage movement had been pretty much in full swing for almost 50 years, with peaks and valleys, of course. But things were different. Lori: There were new technologies. Technologies in communication, transportation, mass media. Newspapers were the most popular form of communication, and the price of a newspaper had dropped. The relationship there is that the ability to find out about these devices was available to almost everyone, whether you were in an urban area or a rural area. And bikes became prevalent in the streets. Lori: Now, not everyone liked them. A lot of cities imposed bans, and there were bands against women riding bikes. One of the things that ties to the suffrage movement is that during the 1890s, so you have the bicycle craze, but you also have probably the, I don't know if I'm would say the height, but the beginning of the strength of the suffrage press. Lori: And as there were mainstream and regional, national newspapers all across country, suffrage leaders started publishing their own works. And there were many. I think in the 1890s, there were something like 30 different suffrage publications. And these acted... Of course, they were political, but they were also quite social. And they serve the purpose of creating community amongst women who are geographically separated, and also maybe not have the same political mindset. Lori: A lot of women probably had not heard about the details of a lot of political organizing that was going on. Or perhaps it had always been treated as this anomaly, this strange thing on the side that was going on. But the way we do social media today, it's very difficult to think about, that someone would take the time to write a letter to the editor, then wait for a month, and get the response. But it was really the way that women communicated. Lori: They would write in a question to the editor and then people would respond with helpful tips in. It was really sort of an exchange of ideas. And you had things that within the suffrage press that certainly were talking about the issue of suffrage, and other social reform issues, but bicycling, or cycling in the 1890s became one of the major topics of conversation. Lori: That's what women wanted to know about. They wanted to know things like how do you ride a bike? How do I get a bike? How much do they cost? What do you do when people harass you, and jeer at you and throw things at you and call you names? Which were all things that happen with great frequency. And the suffrage press played this incredible role in bringing women together in a political way, in a community way. Lori: And also the specific thing, which was the bicycle. Jolie: 2020 marks, the hundredth anniversary of the passing of the 19th amendment, which granted women the right to vote. What are some of the things we might take for granted now that back then really posed major obstacles to the women fighting for suffrage? Lori: If we look at... The marker for the women's suffrage movement is 1848, the Seneca Falls convention, out of which Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Lucretia Mott, and a hundred other people created something called the Declaration of Sentiments. The purpose of that conference, or convention, initially was not for women to gain the right to vote, or even to advocate for the right to vote. It ended up, they discussed that. But it was really the whole women's rights in general. Things we take for granted. Lori: Women during that time period could not serve on a jury. They had no legal rights. They could not own property. They did not have the right to their own children. They did not have the right to divorce. And all of that is based on the United States, adopting a legal system which was based on the English common law system, which is called coverture. And basically what that says is when a man and a woman marry, they become one person and that one person is the male. Lori: The woman's identity was figuratively, but legally and economically merged into with the male. She really was the property if she was single, of her father, if she was married, her husband. And it was really that, that the women's rights movement began to address. And out of that, then the very soon realization was if you don't have the right to vote and you don't have any means to influence lawmakers. You don't have access. Without access you have nothing. Lori: And I think today we are still fighting for so many rights to access, but we don't realize that the most fundamental rights were not ours, except for the people who are part of the suffrage movement for 72 years. And of course today, again, it's people all over the world and people who identify all different ways, who are still fighting for access. Access to self-governance to a voice in governance, to the financial systems, economic systems. So there are a lot of parallels to today. It just seems very diffused today. You know, it's much more diffused and, but yeah, we owe them a lot. Jolie: Many of us have learned some of those major figures from the suffrage movement, but there are many more that are less well known. Do you have any particular figures or key moments in history that you'd like to draw our attention to that maybe don't get covered in the one chapter or that one paragraph in a given textbook? Lori: Right. There is a lot of work going on today to look at individual stories that have not been told about the suffrage movement, and to look at particular demographics within the suffrage movement that before this have not been discussed. Of course, African American women, Native American women, and women of color in general, Asian Americans, immigrants, people who were not fully Americans were part of the movement from its very inception. Lori: We know some of those famous names. We know Harriet Tubman. In fact, there was a movie that was just out about Harriet Tubman. A lot of the black women who were involved in the movement in the early years, came out of the abolitionist movement, as did almost all of the early white women came out out of the abolitionist movement. Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Lucretia Mott who's my ancestor, by the way, Susan B, Anthony. Lori: Those are the names that we know. They all started as abolitionists. They were anti-slavery reformers. Sojourner Truth, who gave the famous speech, "ain't I a woman," in Akron, Ohio. And she was really talking about rights in general. And I don't want to pare down what she said too much, but I encourage anyone to watch some of the reenactments that have been done. I think Alfre Woodard does one. There are quite a few famous black female actors who have reenacted, not necessarily in dress, but the voice, the speech of Sojourner Truth, it is powerful. Lori: You also have so many women who are involved that are much lesser-known, but not during the time period. Ida B Wells, she was a famous person, anti-lynching activist, and journalist. Mary Church Terrell who I believe got her degree at Oberlin College, and was an educator and very well known in the movement. Lori: And then there are all the women that you would see them as the set actors in a movie, in a documentary where you don't know their names, you don't know who they are. But the movement took just thousands and thousands and thousands of people. I mean the movement was 72 years long. It was multigenerational. The two of us, we would have been in the middle of those generations. We would have had mothers and grandmothers, and daughters, and nieces. It was multigenerational. The earliest women in the movement never lived to see the 19th amendment. That always makes me very sad. Lori: But Lucretia Mott died, I think, in 1893, I think that's the date. Elizabeth Cady Stanton, I want to say about 1904, something. Susan B. Anthony, a couple of years after that. Sojourner Truth, Harriet Tubman, all these people, they didn't actually... And this was their life work. This was their job. Lori: And so I think that we... I teach a narrative structure in scriptwriting for television and film. One of the principles that I always try to explain to my students is we never want to look at a movie and say, "Well, it's not as good as the book." The movie is a snapshot, and those snapshots are typically, they become engaging when we have what we call a representative character. And so what's happened is the most well known white women of the suffrage movement have become our representative characters that have taken us through the movement. And now in the last 20 years, it's been about expanding that snapshot. Let's go down all these different avenues. And I think when you study visual culture, you study material culture, you look at visual communication. You start to see that the snapshot is a very, very, very... It can be a very full portrait of all of the people who were involved, including men. of course. Jolie: We're going to take a quick break. Thanks for listening to the big ideas podcast. Announcer : If you are passionate about big ideas, consider sponsoring this program. To have your name or organization mentioned here, please contact ICS at ics@bgsu.edu. Jolie: Hello and welcome back to the Big Ideas podcast today. I'm talking to Dr. Lori Ligate about the Centenary of women's suffrage. Lori, we've been talking a lot about the past and about rediscovering this history. What relevance do you think this story has for our own times? Are there particular points of struggle that today really signify the challenges to women's participation in US politics and governance? Lori: Well, I want to answer that probably two ways. And I'll start with something that is on everyone's mind today, which is that the women's suffrage movement at its endpoint in 1918 was the great flu influenza pandemic. I'm not an expert in that by any means, but of course I've been reading about it recently with regards to the women's suffrage movement. It was sort of a light bulb one day when I realized, I'm doing all this work and I've got all this timeline in my head. And someone mentioned the 1918 influenza pandemic, which I knew that was the year, I was aware of that. I'd never put the two together and thought, "Wow, what did this do to the suffrage movement?" I mean, we have to remember that was a catastrophic global event. In United States, alone, 675000 people died, worldwide 50 million. Lori: And so I look to see what other scholars and journalists have written about this, and actually, Google it, there's some really interesting information to be learned about the women's suffrage movement, and the 1918 flu pandemic. It almost derailed the movement. I don't think it's too far fetched to say that we here in 2020, a hundred years ago, we are very lucky that somehow these women and men were so organized, and had such a machine in place that somehow they were able to overcome this catastrophic world event. And just two years later, less than two years later, 18 months, really the 36th state, Tennessee ratified the 19th amendment. But it almost derailed it. Lori: I read something recently. What it said is that one of the things that happened, we know that during World War I, just like World War II, many women moved into the workforce because the men were away. What I didn't realize was that because the flu pandemic, that also contributed women going into the workforce. Now that need seems antithetical to what we think. But so many men were away during World War II, and then you've got this pandemic. Lori: Women were working as nurses, even if they weren't nurses, they were doing nursing type work, moving into the workforce in a way that had never happened before. Soldiers were coming back from the battlefield and bringing the influenza with them. The death amongst American soldiers was higher than any other population. And so there's all this interconnection between this political movement that had been going on for 70 years and this global pandemic. I think about today when everything has stopped, it seems like. In reality it hasn't. There is still activism that's happening. Right now we're talking probably more than decades about the Equal Rights Amendment. The Equal Rights Amendment grew directly out of the women's suffrage movement. Lori: The sad thing about that now is that we have now surpassed the number of years that it took for women to gain the right to vote. We have not yet attained the Equal Rights Amendment. I think that's sort of a great parallel for today is that, we have so many more mechanisms in place. I mean, what we're doing today, looking at each other awkwardly, in real-time and using several devices to hopefully record this. Now we have devices, technology, means to communicate, and to have a voice that the women and the men back then did not. And the activism that's happening in terms of equal pay, equal access, and I guess just generally equal rights is continuing must continue. And however long this pandemic takes, we can't be derailed by it. Jolie: Talking about the current pandemic. You were on fellowship with ICS this semester, so you were already released from teaching and service, but how has your life changed? Granted, what was already supposed to be a restful, and research focused semester? What has happened to you? Lori: Anticipating that you might ask that question, I've run through many scenarios of how I would answer it in my head. Because the first thing I want to say from a very sincere and genuine place is how much I have appreciated being given this opportunity to do this fellowship. I started really last summer. I forget when it was announced that I got it. I think it was a semester before that. But really last summer I started putting the wheels in motion. I taught a class last semester on the women's suffrage movement. And I went at this full steam. Lori: This semester with not having to teach, and not doing service, the goal was to get out into some archives. I love doing archival research. I wanted to see the bicycle museum, which is located in New Bremen, Ohio. There are quite a few archives that are within driving distance. And so I think that was the first thing was the realization, and I'll be honest, it took me probably like a lot of this, quite a few weeks to realize that probably wasn't going to happen this semester. A lot of archival materials today, thank goodness, are digitized. When you really start looking at things specifically, you realize that a lot of things still are not digitized. So that's been difficult. Lori: As you know, the two primary requirements of the fellowship are the public community presentation, which for me was a scheduled for March 28th. And I would have been doing a very visual, public-friendly, community-friendly talk on the suffrage movement and the impact of the bicycle, and vice versa. Of course, that was canceled. Lori: And then the other thing that just breaks my heart is the Ohio Humanities for the last, I don't know how many years have sponsored a series of Chautauqua programs in Ohio. This was meant to be the last year of Ohio Chautauqua. And this year there were two planned, and one of them was in Rossford, Ohio, which of course is very close to us. And pure coincidence, the theme was Voting in America. I found out about this, I thought I was dreaming, I contacted them and basically forced myself upon them, and met with various people. So we started meeting, I was on the Chautauqua planning committee. I forget how many meetings we had. I think I had a preliminary meeting to meet the director. And then the committee met at least two times. Lori: And it was this great group of people. There were two of us educational types, or educator types on it. But we had the parks and rec guy, and we had the woman who is the local historian, and we had librarians, librarians are good for everything, librarians. Lori: And so this committee of about 10 people, and the Chautauqua was planned for, I think it was the second week, was a five-day event planned for the second week in June. We had five, I study documentaries, so we call them social actors. But I guess in the Chautauqua world, they are a re-enactors. They are the actors that play certain characters from history, coming from different parts of the country. I was working with the League of Women voters and they were going to... And I think I was going to do it too, I was sort of getting my nerve up to dress as suffragists, and to have a parade. And we were going to have voter education materials, and end of the story, it was canceled. Lori: So there is some hope that it could happen in the fall, but I don't know how much that's hope and how much that's reality. That's the way it is. And so I've had to pivot in the work that I'm doing, and go back to doing more secondary source staff, sort of get my wind back a little bit. And I'm going back and looking at some of the 1890s poster art that I love. I'm looking at that from perhaps a 19th-century taxonomy of women. There's still so much interesting work to be done, but it's been disappointing. But I've got a good compared to a lot of people. So I can't be overly disappointed. Jolie: We've talked about this a bit, but about how this movement overlapped with a world war, a different pandemic. As last thoughts for our conversation, is there any kind of lessons we can take, that you would want us to take away from the suffrage movement, managing to persevere in the face of long odds, and many internal and external challenges? Lori: I guess what I would say is that what history teaches us is that the reform movements, social and political, economic, whatever I'm using reform sort of broadly, they succeed if people don't give up. And we have to remember that there are always going to be ebbs and flows to everything. I try to tell myself this personally. There are ebbs and flows to everything, but if you keep going and your commitment is there, the success will eventually come. Lori: Now, whether or not the people who begin the movement live to see it, that's another thing that seems very sad. But what becomes most important is the work itself. And I have experience in labor organizing and that sort of thing, and what I will say is, and this is contrary to what we're taught from a self improvement, that every individual makes a difference. Lori: I think when we look at history, it is always the collective. It is always the collective. We see individuals who stand up, and they become our representative figures in that part of the history. But if you explore further, it's usually a collective that may come after that individual, who takes up the cause and keeps it going. And so power in numbers, I guess, is what I would say. And we will get through this pandemic. When you look at the numbers from 1918, you look at things going back to the black plague, bubonic plague, all those, they wiped out huge numbers in the population, and you wonder how the human race survived. We will get through this, hopefully with not the catastrophic events or the effects of 1918. And so the work has to continue. The activism has to continue, and we've got the tools and mechanisms to make that happen. Jolie: Thank you so much, Lori. It was really great to talk to you. Lori: It was nice to talk to too. Thanks. It was good to see you, too. Jolie: I know, lovely to see you. Yes, we can't be there in person, but this is as close as we can get. Lori: Yes, absolutely. Jolie: You can find the Big Ideas podcast on Apple podcasts, Google play Spotify, or wherever you like to listen. Our producers are Chris Cavera, and Marco Mendoza. Research assistance was provided by Rex Light with editing by Stevie Scheurich. Special thanks go out to Marco for his extraordinary sound editing in challenging conditions.  

La tertulia semanal en la que repasamos las últimas noticias de la actualidad científica. En el episodio de hoy: Actualidad del Covid-19 (min 5:00); El evento Dryas reciente: ¿un impacto catastrófico? (28:00); Vacío cósmico y la tensión de la constante de Hubble (51:00); La anomalía de KOTO (1:16:00); La actividad solar en los últimos 4,000 millones de años (1:40:00). En la foto, de arriba a abajo y de izquierda a derecha: Alberto Aparici, Francis Villatoro, Carlos Westendorp, Héctor Socas. Todos los comentarios vertidos durante la tertulia representan únicamente la opinión de quien los hace... y a veces ni eso. CB:SyR es una colaboración del Museo de la Ciencia y el Cosmos de Tenerife con el Área de Investigación y la UC3 del Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias.

La tertulia semanal en la que repasamos las últimas noticias de la actualidad científica. En el episodio de hoy: Actualidad del Covid-19 (min 5:00); El evento Dryas reciente: ¿un impacto catastrófico? (28:00); Vacío cósmico y la tensión de la constante de Hubble (51:00); La anomalía de KOTO (1:16:00); La actividad solar en los últimos 4,000 millones de años (1:40:00). En la foto, de arriba a abajo y de izquierda a derecha: Alberto Aparici, Francis Villatoro, Carlos Westendorp, Héctor Socas. Todos los comentarios vertidos durante la tertulia representan únicamente la opinión de quien los hace... y a veces ni eso. CB:SyR es una colaboración del Museo de la Ciencia y el Cosmos de Tenerife con el Área de Investigación y la UC3 del Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias.

Going way off topic with Peter Allen! 

RC brings forth more evidence of distinct YDB extraterrestrial event markers in lake cores from Central America. He presents oddities from the Boslough and Surovell self-supporting distraction papers, but they had the establishment PR working to present their incompetent work as the findings of “experts” that had debunked the YDIH. It’s critical for people to realize that humans were present during this period of catastrophe and were victims, not the instigators.  RC goes through the list of deficient testing procedures used by the Surovell team that resulted in the news stories that the “experts” had proven the YD impact evidence false – revealing their own lack of competence, and perhaps purposely not finding what they didn’t want to find. Is it laziness, ignorance, Freudian, or conspiratorial? This controversy may be the most important in the history of science, and we’re going to bring you the details!    Donate to this work thru our Patreon subscription/membership sites, and receive special perks: https://patreon.com/RandallCarlson  and https://patreon.com/geocosmicrex   Watch the series in sequence to get all the evidence presented as Randall builds his case:  https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLTRcDAFHjDSj4k17kQYrjtR0IhLsksYI8   You can also watch on https://youtube.com/kosmographia to see full-length, with extra scenes and extensive show notes in the description.   Kosmographia logo and design animation by Snake Bros: http://www.BrothersoftheSerpent.com/ Theme music by Fifty Dollar Dynasty: http://www.FiftyDollarDynasty.net/

Randall talks about the "Great 5" extinction events' severity and that all are now connected to impact events, then brings us back to the latest mass extinction at the YDB and whether we are now amidst a 6th. He reviews where we left off last episode and wants a report on Hall's Cave near the Snake Bros in Texas... Randall presents more evidence for catastrophe from studies in Mexico and Venezuela that confirm inter-hemispheric effects to the planet at the YDB. He then goes into some of the writings and sources of the critic Mark Boslough, who uses a paper by Yang et al. that actually point to their evidence being from a cosmic event. Lastly, the ever-present sun is considered as part of the complex puzzle - quoting from "Explosive Events on the Sun" and asking: "What is the trigger?"    Support Randall Carlson's efforts to discover and share pivotal paradigm-shifting information! Donate to this work thru our Patreon subscription/membership sites, and receive special perks: https://patreon.com/RandallCarlson  and https://patreon.com/geocosmicrex   Watch the series in sequence to get all the evidence presented as Randall builds his case:  https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLTRcDAFHjDSj4k17kQYrjtR0IhLsksYI8   You can also watch on https://youtube.com/RandallCarlson1440  to see full-length, with extra scenes and extensive show notes in the description.   Kosmographia logo and design animation by Snake Bros: http://www.BrothersoftheSerpent.com/ Theme music by Fifty Dollar Dynasty: http://www.FiftyDollarDynasty.net/

On New Year’s Eve, prior to a new decade 2020, RC recounts some previous missed predictions of catastrophe and the morals from the “Boy who Cried Wolf” story. Then digging into some scientific papers that reveal evidence for the Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis including the “black mat” and hexagonal nano-diamonds, he speculates with the authors on what kind of event(s) could produce these unique markers of catastrophe. Randall also reveals his vision of what may be the culprit for repeated catastrophes, and especially most recently the Younger Dryas Boundary events, then gets into the details of a couple of the early papers in support of the YDIH – from Hall’s Cave, Texas, and Santa Rosa of the Channel Islands off the coast of southern California, which were all one landmass with the Ice Age lowered sea level. In addition to mammoths, abundant impact proxies, and flood sediments, they found bones from a female that may have perished in the catastrophe… Donate to this work thru our Patreon subscription/membership sites, and receive special perks: https://patreon.com/RandallCarlson and https://patreon.com/geocosmicrex Watch the series in sequence to get all the evidence presented as Randall builds his case: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list... YDIH pro/con research collection at the CosmicTusk: https://cosmictusk.com/younger-dryas-... Kosmographia logo and design animation by Snake Bros: http://www.BrothersoftheSerpent.com/ Theme music by Fifty Dollar Dynasty: http://www.FiftyDollarDynasty.net/

During a loose review of topics from the previous episode with Cosmic Tusk George Howard, RC talks about discovering the mysterious Carolina Bays controversy, searching for Georgia tektites along the “fall line” south of Macon, the “Complex Theory” for the Bays’ formation and its downfall, and the location of the Hiawatha Crater in relation to the many documented flood features at the Ice Sheets’ margins. The geomorphic evidence is inconsistent with typical marginal recession, so we are considering melting epicenters hundreds of miles from the margins. Randall also talks about melting epicenters and sub-glacial drumlin formation, being obsessed with the sudden shift of the Younger Dryas since he learned about it in the mid-80's, the seminal paper introducing the carbon-rich layer - the "black mat", and looking to find an integrating theory. He also broaches Velikovsky, asking for some extraordinary proofs from the EU crowd, and then gives an extraordinary introduction to our upcoming series of episodes on the YDB. Cosmography101-4.1 https://youtu.be/YrYsNB-k5kM Antonio Zamora’s channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCM8b... Michael Davias LiDAR of the Carolina Bays https://www.cintos.org Donate to this work thru our Patreon subscription/membership sites, and receive special perks: https://patreon.com/RandallCarlson and https://patreon.com/geocosmicrex Watch the series in sequence to get all the evidence presented as Randall builds his case: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list... You can also watch on https://youtube.com/kosmographia to see full-length, with extra scenes and extensive show notes in the description. Kosmographia logo and design animation by Snake Bros: http://www.BrothersoftheSerpent.com/ Theme music by Fifty Dollar Dynasty: http://www.FiftyDollarDynasty.net/

Justin joins us for a swapcast to answer some of his questions about ancient history. We chat about some of his latest video’s on “placenta evolving from an ancient retrovirus” and the “Doggerland dredging”. We also chat about suspending belief, the Ancient Frontier Project, hidden hand of history, human evolution, conquistadors, genetics and his great youtube channel!    https://www.youtube.com/user/skdnmstr/videos   See links for stuff we talked about during the show   https://grimerica.ca/2017/07/15/ep232/ Macroevolution with Eugene McCarthy    https://www.pabproject.org    Please help support the show…. Grimerica’s DoBeDoBeDo List: Grimerica is fully and solely listener supported. We adhere to the Value for Value model.  0 ads, 0 sponsorships, 0 breaks, 0 portals and links to corporate websites… just many hours of unlimited content for free. Thanks for listening!!   https://www.13questionspodcast.com/ Our New Podcast - 13 Questions   Join the chat / hangout with a bunch of fellow Grimerican’s  www.grimerica.ca/chats   1-403-702-6083Call and leave a voice mail or send us a text   Support the show directly http://www.grimerica.ca/support https://www.patreon.com/grimerica     GrimericaFM  https://s2.radio.co/s053ed3122/listen Check out our next trip/conference/meetup - Contact at the Cabin   Leave a review on iTunes and/or Stitcher https://itunes.apple.com/ca/podcast/the-grimerica-show/id653314424?mt=2# http://www.stitcher.com/podcast/the-grimerica-show    Sign up for our newsletter http://www.grimerica.ca/news Leave a comment, ideas and guest/topic suggestions under any episode or blog http://www.grimerica.ca/   SPAM Graham = and send him your synchronicities, feedback, strange experiences and psychedelic trip reports!! graham@grimerica.com InstaGRAM  https://www.instagram.com/the_grimerica_show_podcast/    Tweet Darren https://twitter.com/Grimerica   Connect through other platforms: https://www.reddit.com/r/grimerica/  https://gab.ai/Grimerica    Purchase swag, with partial proceeds donated to the show www.grimerica.ca/swag Send us a postcard or letter http://www.grimerica.ca/contact/ Thanks to Wayne Darnell for help with the website. http://www.darnelldigitalink.com/ http://www.lostbreadcomic.com/ link to Napolean Duheme's site  Felix’s Site sirfelix.bandcamp.com   Christmas Carol Video   MUSIC Grimerica Theme - Lock & Key Disco Ball - Sir Felix Ortega II

On this edition of the Seven Ages Audio Journal, after news pertaining to the surprising results of DNA studies in West Africa and a Japanese experiment in search of answers about ancient seafaring, we turn our attention to one of the greatest controversies in modern science that unites the fields of archaeology, geology, and climate science: the Younger Dryas impact hypothesis. Joining us to discuss it are two leading experts on the topic--a geoarchaeologist and a planetary scientist--who offer their perspectives on the latest developments in support of this hotly debated theory. Christopher R. Moore, PhD, is a geoarchaeologist and Special Projects Director with the Savannah River Archaeological Research Program. His research interests include site formation processes and geochronology of stratified sites in the southeastern Coastal Plain, paleoenvironmental reconstruction, early hunter-gatherer adaptations, lithic technology, and immunological blood residue analysis of stone tools. Chris is also the lead researcher of the White Pond Human Paleoecology Project and has authored and coauthored numerous papers on the Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis including one documenting the presence of widespread Platinum anomalies at the Younger Dryas Boundary (YDB) as well as a recent paper on White Pond (near Elgin, SC) supporting the YD impact hypothesis. Malcolm Lecompte is a planetary scientist and remote sensing specialist. He holds a B.S. with Honors in Physics from the University of Wyoming and an MS in Astro-geophysics from the University of Colorado in Boulder. He received his Ph.D. in Astrophysical, Planetary and Atmospheric Sciences in 1984. Lecompte also became affiliated with the Naval Aviation reserve in 1980, and before ending his military flight career in 1991, compiled over 1,000 hours of military aircrew and private pilot time, officially retiring from the Naval Reserve as a Commander in 1998 after 23 years of active service. From 2004 until 2009, after a post-doctoral appointment at the Harvard College Observatory and Smithsonian Center Astrophysics (as well as a period managing DoD sponsored R&D projects), Lecompte held a faculty position as an Associate Professor and Research Director at Elizabeth City State University's Center of Excellence in Remote Sensing Education and Research. Now retired, LeCompte has since devoted himself to investigating earth impacts during the late Pleistocene and Holocene epochs by asteroid and comets. He is currently working in collaboration with colleagues at ECSU and other research organizations. Follow the Seven Ages Research Associates online:  Twitter     Instagram     Facebook Below are links to stories covered on this edition of the podcast:  'Ghost' DNA In West Africans Complicates Story Of Human Origins Early Modern Humans Could Sail, Archaeologists Confirm Music featured in this episode: "Horizon" MONIN  (YouTube) "Eva" – 失望した (Youtube)

We have George Howard on to talk about the Comet Research Group and the Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis, and new developments in the scientific conversation around this topic. He tells stories about being shunned at conferences, how the impact camp is growing and the resistance team shrinking, the huge news of the Hiawatha crater in Greenland and then the quick disappearance of coverage, and his own procurement and testing of a 11 foot-long mammoth tusk. He also rants about professional “science communicators” totally ignoring this momentous research, and the importance of speculation within science.   Support Randall Carlson's efforts to discover and share pivotal paradigm-shifting information! Improve the quality of the podcast and future videos. Allow him more time for his research into the many scientific journals, books, and his expeditions into the field, as he continues to decipher the clues that explain the mysteries of our past, and prepare us for the future... Visit George's excellent website and blog, The Cosmic Tusk, as well as The Bibliography of published papers related to the YDIH.   Donate to this work thru our Patreon subscription/membership sites, and receive special perks: https://patreon.com/RandallCarlson  and https://patreon.com/geocosmicrex   Watch the series in sequence to get all the evidence presented as Randall builds his case:  https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLTRcDAFHjDSj4k17kQYrjtR0IhLsksYI8   You can also watch on https://youtube.com/kosmographia to see full-length, with extra scenes and extensive show notes in the description.   Kosmographia logo and design animation by Snake Bros: http://www.BrothersoftheSerpent.com/ Theme music by Fifty Dollar Dynasty: http://www.FiftyDollarDynasty.net/

RC reviews the species loss and timings of the "Great Five" extinction events throughout Earth history, then provides more examples from the scientific literature regarding the taphonomic circumstances under which some of the recovered Pleistocene megafauna's remains have been found - first burned and then rolled into and buried with flood gravels/deposits.   Support Randall Carlson's efforts to discover and share pivotal paradigm-shifting information! Improve the quality of the podcast and future videos. Allow him more time for his research into the many scientific journals, books, and his expeditions into the field, as he continues to decipher the clues that explain the mysteries of our past, and prepare us for the future...   Donate to this work thru our Patreon subscription/membership sites, and receive special perks: https://patreon.com/RandallCarlson and https://patreon.com/geocosmicrex   Audio versions now available for download thru your favorite podcast vendors/apps! Watch the series in sequence to get all the evidence presented as Randall builds his case:  https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLTRcDAFHjDSj4k17kQYrjtR0IhLsksYI8   You can also watch on https://youtube.com/kosmographia to see full-length, with extra scenes and extensive show notes in the description.   Kosmographia logo and design animation by Snake Bros: http://www.BrothersoftheSerpent.com/ Theme music by Fifty Dollar Dynasty: http://www.FiftyDollarDynasty.net/

RC continues to show evidence for Younger Dryas extinction factors other than bands of roving hunters with spears – sudden catastrophic burial in most cases is the commonality for preservation of fossils, which builds the foundation for many episodes to come that will define the conditions and reveal the ultimate trigger for all these coeval shifts. Support this work thru our Patreon subscription/membership sites, and receive special perks: https://patreon.com/RandallCarlson and https://patreon.com/geocosmicrex Watch the series in sequence to get all the evidence presented as Randall builds his case: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list... You can also watch on https://youtube.com/kosmographia to see full-length, with extra scenes and extensive show notes in the description. Kosmographia logo and design animation by Snake Bros: http://www.BrothersoftheSerpent.com/ Theme music by Fifty Dollar Dynasty: http://www.FiftyDollarDynasty.net/ Editing and publishing by Bradley Young with YSI Productions LLC (copyrights)

We recorded this a few days after Halloween, so RC talks about Taurids, more on the Younger Dryas Boundary megafauna extinction, and the "Great 5" previous massive events, then some of the affects on civilization if another similar event happened today. We've been charmed with the Holocene's extended warm and stable climate, but we've still been through shifts that have stressed and modified our advancements. RC also shares graphs showing the sudden decline of the Clovis Culture. Randall defines the Quaternary period and shows some of the taphonomic circumstances in which mammoth and other megafauna remains have been found, observing that they all were preserved due to sudden and catastrophic burial, as described vividly and dramatically by anthropologist/explorer Frank C. Hibben.   Support this work thru our Patreon subscription/membership sites, and receive special perks: https://patreon.com/RandallCarlson and https://patreon.com/geocosmicrex Watch the series in sequence to get all the evidence presented as Randall builds his case: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list... You can also watch on https://youtube.com/kosmographia to see full-length, with extra scenes and extensive show notes in the description. Kosmographia logo and design animation by Snake Bros: http://www.BrothersoftheSerpent.com/ Theme music by Fifty Dollar Dynasty: http://www.FiftyDollarDynasty.net/ Editing and publishing by Bradley Young with YSI Productions LLC (copyrights) LeCompte et al. debunking the debunkers: https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/109... Cosmography101 Playlist (Halloween/Day of the Dead is Class 11, not 4-6 as guessed in video): https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list... Decrypting the Cosmic Origins of Halloween: https://youtu.be/75hVrv392BY

RC and crew continue to introduce the conditions and difficulties for life and the planet during the Pleistocene-Holocene transition, and evaluate the extinction of the mega-mammals at the Younger-Dryas Boundary, bringing in 19th century scientific journal articles that spell out the findings and evaluations in direct terms – making it clear that the way the animals were killed and the sheer quantity of the remains puts the question beyond the possibility of human hunters and into the broad realm of global catastrophe. Support this work thru our Patreon subscription/membership sites, and receive special perks: https://patreon.com/RandallCarlson and https://patreon.com/geocosmicrex  Watch the series in sequence to get all the evidence presented as Randall builds his case: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list... You can also watch on https://youtube.com/kosmographia to see full-length, with extra scenes and extensive show notes in the description. Kosmographia logo and design animation by Brothers of the Serpent http://www.brothersoftheserpent.com/ Intro music by Fifty Dollar Dynasty http://www.fiftydollardynasty.net Editing and publishing of the audio version by Russ and Kyle Allen with Holocene LLC (copyrights) Globalsealeveldrop110m map et al. https://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/mgg/topo/pi... Near Earth Asteroids census video: https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.ph...

Randall transitions into the first stages of the many-tiered discussions that will follow regarding the period that Plato pegged long ago as the time when the fabled Atlantis was destroyed – what scientists now refer to as the Younger-Dryas Boundary or Pleistocene/Holocene transition, when many sudden shifts to life and the planet are documented. Randall also displays some of the monstrous bestiary that lived through the Pleistocene Ice Age cycles, but all of these mega-mammal or "megafauna" species went extinct, along with many others and the Clovis culture too, about 12,000 years ago. Support this work thru our Patreon subscription/membership sites, and receive special perks: https://patreon.com/RandallCarlson and https://patreon.com/geocosmicrex A Watch the series in sequence to get all the evidence presented as Randall builds his case: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list... You can also watch on https://youtube.com/kosmographia to see full-length, with extra scenes and extensive show notes in the description.   Kosmographia logo and design animation by Brothers of the Serpent Intro music by Fifty Dollar Dynasty Editing and publishing of the video versions by Bradley Young with YSI Productions LLC (copyrights)     "Back to Bretz" scientific paper: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/8a12...

Randall reveals how the measurements stated for the Atlantis city plan “Inner Island” at 5 stades (and the Temple of Poseidon at 1x1/2 stade) directly links to the measure of the Earth and also of time.  We then go thru curious numerical and astronomical correlations as we transition out of the Atlantis-focused lessons and on to the “chronostratigraphic context” that is the dramatic and catastrophic events of the Younger-Dryas transition from the Pleistocene to the Holocene era. Precession and the Great Year; lunar numbers and baseball; Sexagesimal division of the circle; solar system oddities; Pole star navigation; Firestone, Kennett, West et al. present at the AGU re: Younger Dryas Boundary; YD impact hypothesis and the Comet Research Group. An “Instant Classic” episode that you’ll need to hear more than once!     Support this work thru our Patreon subscription/membership sites, and receive special perks: https://patreon.com/RandallCarlson  and https://patreon.com/geocosmicrex   Watch the series in sequence to get all the evidence presented as Randall builds his case:  https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLTRcDAFHjDSj4k17kQYrjtR0IhLsksYI8   You can also watch on https://youtube.com/kosmographia to see full-length, with extra scenes and extensive show notes in the description.   Kosmographia logo and design animation by Brothers of the Serpent Intro music by Fifty Dollar Dynasty

Randall goes through lots of published research from major journals, sonar scans and bathymetric data showing numerous and recent landslides from the Canary Islands, likely from seismic activity, and dated consistently around the Pleistocene/Holocene transition period. We also look at how many features in the Azores Islands match up with those described in the writings of Plato. Support this work thru our Patreon subscription/membership sites, and receive special perks: https://patreon.com/RandallCarlson and https://patreon.com/geocosmicrex Watch the series in sequence on GeoCosmicRex to get all the evidence presented as Randall builds his case: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list... You can also watch on https://youtube.com/kosmographia to see full-length, with extra scenes, including extensive show notes in the description. Kosmographia logo and design animation by Brothers of the Serpent  Intro music by Fifty Dollar Dynasty

RC reviews temperature graphs from ice core records that show the climatic swings that accompanied the sudden Younger-Dryas catastrophe - which correlated with Plato’s timing of the subsidence of Atlantis - and bring into question the modern assessments of a current climate crisis. Also links climate and cultural shifts during the Holocene. Support this work thru our Patreon subscription/membership sites, and receive special perks: https://patreon.com/RandallCarlson and https://patreon.com/geocosmicrex    Original graph from Dansgaard 1993 paper published in journal Nature: https://www.nature.com/articles/364218a0

Randall dives into the descriptions of eustasy and isostasy – the rising and lowering of the lands and the seas, on the continents and at the floor of the ocean. Evidence for “large and significant displacements” and large vertical movements of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge was identified in the 1970s. He discusses the transverse ridges and the reasons why these studies have been buried without recognition.   You too can support our efforts here: https://patreon.com/RandallCarlson and/or https://patreon.com/geocosmicrex More notes when released on the "Kosmographia" channel! Intro music and logos by the Brothers of the Serpent!

Lord Jesus, You are the Good Shepherd, without whom nothing is secure. Rescue and preserve us that we may not be lost forever but follow You, rejoicing in the way that leads to eternal life; for You live and reign with the Father and the Holy Spirit, one God, now and forever. Amen!

Lord Jesus, You are the Good Shepherd, without whom nothing is secure. Rescue and preserve us that we may not be lost forever but follow You, rejoicing in the way that leads to eternal life; for You live and reign with the Father and the Holy Spirit, one God, now and forever. Amen!

Recorded June 4th, 2019 www.patreon.com/conspirinormal Randall Carlson rejoins us on the show! We speak to Randall about his recent trip the Southwest. We talk specifically about his time spent in Mesa Verde and Chimney Rock and some of his ideas about how the landscapes were formed. We then discuss some more of his ideas about climate change and what he thinks the mechanisms may be. Plus what is the connection between the Holy Grail and a climate change in the Dark Ages. You can contact Randall at: https://sacredgeometryinternational.com/ www.conspirinormal.com https://www.facebook.com/pages/Conspirinormal/445112635502740

Recorded February 3rd, 2018 It's finally here! Episode 200 has cometh. We assembled a powerhouse trio of guests. Joshua Cutchin and Randall Carlson both came up from Atlanta to bre a part of the show. Dr. Future also appears and the discussion began to transcend time and space. Enough said guys please enjoy and a big thank you to all our listeners and supporters who have gotten us to 200 episodes!

https://www.patreon.com/conspirinormal Recorded February 6th, 2018 Micah Hanks triumphantly returns to the show and he is joined by his associates Jason Pentrail and James Waldo. We discuss with them their new venture the "Seven Ages Research Associates" Seven Ages specializes in archaelogy and historical mysteries. We look into the debate on a comet impact that caused the Younger Dryas, the various eras of human habitation in North America, and the Solutrean Hypotheis. Check out their website at: https://sevenages.org/ www.conspirinormal.com https://www.facebook.com/pages/Conspirinormal/445112635502740

If you would like to support our show by becoming a Patreon please visit: https://www.patreon.com/conspirinormal Recorded June 25th, 2017. We welcome Randall Carlson back to the show to discuss some of the themes covered in an earlier interview done on the Joe Rogan Podcast with Graham Hancock and Michael Shermer. Randall lets us know his feelings about the interview and some of the themes and ideas repersented. We than turn to discuss some of the different ideas about climate change and whether the current climate change paradigm is correct. Randall than discusses the Younger Dryas and the course of the various Ice Ages and the mechanisms that cause them. We also explore an event that occurred in Rob's home town and how it may be linked to comets and the Great Chicago Fire. You can contact Randall at: http://sacredgeometryinternational.com/randall-carlson and as always: www.conspirinormal.com https://www.facebook.com/pages/Conspirinormal/445112635502740

Aaron talks with Matthew Boeckman (@matthewboeckman, owner dryas.io, ex-VP of DevOps Craftsy) about life in the DevOps trenches at a high growth startup over the course of six years. Lessons learned, and a glimpse into what’s next in the industry. Show Links: Get a free eBook from O'Reilly media or use promo code PC20CLOUD for a discount - 40% off Print Books and 50% off eBooks and videos Dryas.io Website Craftsy Website Matthew's Articles on Dryas.io Matthew's Articles on DevOps.com VictorOps Blog Beyond Blame: Learning From Failure and Success Show Notes: Topic 1 - We first met at AWS Re:Invent a few years ago while you were still at Craftsy and I was fascinated by your journey to where you are now. You were doing DevOps before it was cool. Tell us a little about your history and your run up to opening your own consulting business? Topic 2 - What were your keys to success running both DevOps and Operations? Topic 3 - As a practitioner, how much do you follow the DevOps community? Are there certain people or trends that you follow? What is interesting to you these days? Topic 4 - Looking back, what would you have done differently? Topic 5 - We have a lot of listeners that are just starting out, how would you recommend they get started? Topic 6 - What made you decide to leave your role at Craftsy and hang out your own signpost? Feedback? Email:show at thecloudcast dot net Twitter:@thecloudcastnet or @serverlesscast YouTube:Cloudcast Channel

Noticias semanales de nuestro delicious.com/geocastaway