Podcasts about theorists

Brazil, 1966. Two men in suits were found dead on a hill, surrounded by odd notes, and wearing lead eye masks. With no sign of violence, police were baffled. Theorists linked the men to occult rituals, criminal conspiracy, and maybe even alien contact. Keep up with us on Instagram @theconspiracypod! Have a story to share? Email us at conspiracystories@spotify.com Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Welcome to episode 297 of The Cloud Pod – where the forecast is always cloudy! Justin, Ryan, and Matthew have beaten the black lung and are in the studio – ready to bring you all the latest and greatest in cloud and AI news! We've got Wiz buyouts (that security, it's so hot right now!) Gemma 3, Glue 5 (but not 3 or 4) and Gemini Robots – plus looking forward to AI Skills Fest and Google Next, all this week on The Cloud Pod.  Titles we almost went with this week: Google! Yer a WIZ—Ard Google Announces Network Security Integration… and that must include WIZ Gemini Robots…. What could go wrong  AI Data Studios … So Hot Right Now I want 32 Billion dollars Azure Follow AWS in bad life choices – mk Wait Glue is more than v2 What happened to Glue 3 and 4? 5th Try and AWS Glue still sucks A big thanks to this week's sponsor: We're sponsorless! Want to get your brand, company, or service in front of a very enthusiastic group of cloud news seekers? You've come to the right place! Send us an email or hit us up on our slack channel for more info.  Follow Up  01:05 Microsoft quantum computing claim still lacks evidence: physicists are dubious A MS researcher presented results behind the company's controversial claim to have created the first topological qubits – a long-sought goal of quantum computing.  Theorists said it’s a hard problem, and that it was a beautiful talk but the claims come without evidence, and people think they have gone overboard.  The Head of Quantum at Amazon was also highly skeptical: https://www.businessinsider.com/amazon-exec-casts-doubt-microsoft-quantum-claims-2025-3 02:09 Justin – “No one’s really buying Microsoft actually created a new topological qubit. There’s some doubt… basically they said that what they showed, which is a microscopic H-shaped aluminum wire on top of indium arsenide – a superconductor at ultra-cold temperatures, and the devices are designed to harness majoranas, previously undiscovered quasi-particles that are essential for topological qubits to work, and the goals for majoranas to appear at the four tips of the H-shaped wire emerging from reflective-behavior electrons, and these majorans in theory could be used to perform quantum computing that are resistant to information loss, but no proof, no evidence, and they think Microsoft’s full of it.” General News  04:12 Google + Wiz: Strengthening Multicloud Security Google has announced the signing of a definitive agreement to acquire Wiz. This will allow them to better provide business and governments with more choice in how they protect themselves.  Google answers why now… and that they have seen their

A very special episode featuring cutting-edge scientific theorist Mac Tonnies, who holds forth on all those ongoing Martian mysteries, the Phoenix Mars probe, the state of paranormal belief systems, and various theories on the reality of UFOs that often extend beyond the concept of visits by ET. Sadly Mac died in 2009.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-paracast-the-gold-standard-of-paranormal-radio--6203433/support.

* Live tweeting history* The importance of Jack * The “climate of hate”* Some of these goofballs are normal* RIP Manny* The fake ceasefire * If only were weren't a democracy…* Back to Gaza * Civil liberties, due process, and magicians * And a bunch more…. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.wethefifth.com/subscribe

Society often rewards conformity, making it easy to fall into patterns of safe, predictable thinking. Creativity gets buried under routine, and the fear of stepping outside the norm keeps people from exploring new ideas. But the most groundbreaking successes don't come from just being the smartest in the room—they come from being the most curious. When you start asking better questions, challenging assumptions, and embracing the unknown, real innovation begins. Craig Copeland is a researcher, author, and speaker focused on the mechanics of innovative thinking. With three personal development books, including Disruptors: The Gateway to Genius Level Thinking, he has spent 14 years studying what sets extraordinary minds apart. Through interviews and research, he explores the gap between intelligence and true creative genius. Today, he discusses the power of curiosity, childlike exploration, and ego-free thinking in unlocking creativity. He emphasizes the importance of challenging societal norms and embracing intuitive thinking as a path to groundbreaking innovation. Stay tuned! Resources Craig Copeland: A Simple System for Finding Your Genius Connect with Craig Copeland on LinkedIn Get a copy of Disruptors: The Gateway to Genius Level Thinking by Craig Copeland on Amazon

Conflict theory is the belief that political disagreements come from material conflict. So for example, if rich people support capitalism, and poor people support socialism, this isn't because one side doesn't understand economics. It's because rich people correctly believe capitalism is good for the rich, and poor people correctly believe socialism is good for the poor. Or if white people are racist, it's not because they have some kind of mistaken stereotypes that need to be corrected - it's because they correctly believe racism is good for white people. Some people comment on my more political posts claiming that they're useless. You can't (they say) produce change by teaching people Economics 101 or the equivalent. Conflict theorists understand that nobody ever disagreed about Economics 101. Instead you should try to organize and galvanize your side, so they can win the conflict. I think simple versions of conflict theory are clearly wrong. This doesn't mean that simple versions of mistake theory (the idea that people disagree because of reasoning errors, like not understanding Economics 101) are automatically right. But it gives some leeway for thinking harder about how reasoning errors and other kinds of error interact. https://readscottalexander.com/posts/acx-why-i-am-not-a-conflict-theorist 

Invited theorists: Ogi Ogas, Michael Hughes, David Ian Howe. Random theorists: James McGinn, Zarrin Leff, Austin Baldinger, Matthew Fox, Joe Cook, Shane SimonsenPanel: Doug Lee, Anastasia Bendebury, Michael Shilo DeLayLearn how to think, not what to think! Paradigm Drift is the show where we celebrate the principles of scientific anarchy. Anything goes, as long as you can make a coherent presentation about why your theory and why you think it's going to change the world. Each theorist gets 60 seconds, followed by an interview with us and our panelist. MAKE HISTORY WITH US THIS SUMMER:https://demystifysci.com/demysticon-2025PATREON https://www.patreon.com/c/demystifysciPARADIGM DRIFT SIGN UP FOR 3/25, 6:30p PDT:https://demystifysci.com/paradigm-drift-showPATREON: get episodes early + join our weekly Patron Chat https://bit.ly/3lcAasBMERCH: Rock some DemystifySci gear : https://demystifysci.myspreadshop.com/allAMAZON: Do your shopping through this link: https://amzn.to/3YyoT98SUBSTACK: https://substack.com/@UCqV4_7i9h1_V7hY48eZZSLw@demystifysci(00:00) Go! Welcome to Paradigm Drift #1(00:02:30) Ogi's Theory of Physics and Purpose(00:14:57) James' Theory Hydrogen Bonding Misunderstanding(00:26:28) Zarrin's Theory of Alexander the Great's Lost Tomb(00:36:48) Austin's Theory of Everything(00:46:45) Michael's Theory of Water as Bio-sensor & actuator(01:10:47) Matthew's Theory of Fine Structure Constant(01:14:10) Joe's Theory of Physical Dimensionality(01:30:33) Shane's Theory of Life's Double Origin(01:42:54) David's Theory of Cognitive Evolution and Tool-Making(01:57:26) Goodnight!#livepodcast, #ScientificTheories, #InnovativeIdeas, #CosmicCycle, #HydrogenBonding, #ArchaeologicalDiscoveries, #CellularBiology, #OsmoticPressure, #ExperimentalPhysics, #HistoricalMysteries, #AlternativeEnergy, #philosophypodcast , #sciencepodcast, #longformpodcastCheck our short-films channel, @DemystifySci: https://www.youtube.com/c/DemystifyingScience AND our material science investigations of atomics, @MaterialAtomics https://www.youtube.com/@MaterialAtomicsJoin our mailing list https://bit.ly/3v3kz2S PODCAST INFO: Anastasia completed her PhD studying bioelectricity at Columbia University. When not talking to brilliant people or making movies, she spends her time painting, reading, and guiding backcountry excursions. Shilo also did his PhD at Columbia studying the elastic properties of molecular water. When he's not in the film studio, he's exploring sound in music. They are both freelance professors at various universities. - Blog: http://DemystifySci.com/blog - RSS: https://anchor.fm/s/2be66934/podcast/rss- Donate: https://bit.ly/3wkPqaD- Swag: https://bit.ly/2PXdC2y SOCIAL: - Discord: https://discord.gg/MJzKT8CQub- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/DemystifySci- Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/DemystifySci/- Twitter: https://twitter.com/DemystifySciMUSIC: -Shilo Delay: https://g.co/kgs/oty671

The Illuminati For centuries, whispers of a secret society pulling the strings behind world events have persisted. From government control to pop culture manipulation, the Illuminati has become one of the most famous and enduring conspiracy theories of all time. But is there any truth to it? In this episode, we explore the real history of the Illuminati, its alleged modern influence, and the theories that claim the secret society never truly disappeared. Episode Highlights: The Origins of the Illuminati The Bavarian Illuminati (1776) – A real secret society founded by Adam Weishaupt in Germany, meant to promote Enlightenment ideals and challenge monarchies and religious control. Goals & Structure – Operated in strict secrecy, recruited powerful individuals, and sought to influence politics from behind the scenes. Suppression & Disbanding (1785) – Banned by the Bavarian government, but some believe it simply went underground and continued in secret. The Illuminati's Connection to Modern Conspiracies Freemasons & The New World Order – Theories suggest the Illuminati infiltrated the Freemasons and continued working behind the scenes. Major Historical Events – Some claim the French Revolution, U.S. Founding, and world wars were secretly influenced by Illuminati ideals. Symbols of Control – Alleged Illuminati symbols (like the All-Seeing Eye and pyramids) appear in currency, architecture, and corporate logos. Pop Culture & The Illuminati Mythos Music Industry Conspiracies – Stars like Jay-Z, Beyoncé, and Kanye West are rumored to be Illuminati members, using occult symbols in music videos. Hollywood & Mind Control – Theories about MK-Ultra, celebrity breakdowns, and hidden messages in films. Super Bowl, Awards Shows & Hidden Rituals – Large public events allegedly contain Illuminati symbolism, mass conditioning, and hidden messages. Real-Life Events Linked to the Illuminati The French Revolution (1789-1799) – Some believe the Illuminati orchestrated the fall of the monarchy. JFK Assassination (1963) – Theorists claim JFK was killed for challenging the secret elite. The Moon Landing (1969) – Alleged staged event to push a global control agenda. 9/11 & The War on Terror – Conspiracies suggest the event was designed to increase government surveillance. The Great Reset – A modern theory claiming the Illuminati is using economic and political crises to create a one-world government. The Big Question: Is the Illuminati Real? Why People Want to Believe – The idea of a secret elite pulling the strings makes the world feel more structured and explainable. The Power of Influence vs. Direct Control – Secret societies do exist, but are they really orchestrating world events or just powerful networking groups? Final Verdict? – There's no solid proof of a global Illuminati, but history has shown that small elite groups can and do influence world affairs. Thanks for listening, but remember, don't tell anyone about what you heard today, because This Podcast Is a Secret!

The theoretical physicist and media personality is our podcast guest

Send us a textDo you contemplate topics like climate change, biodiversity loss, and the risk of civilizational collapse? If so, then you probably understand something about bargaining – a psychological defense mechanism that's one of the five stages of grief. With just a wee bit of embarrassment, Asher, Jason, and Rob reveal damning episodes of bargaining from their personal histories (involving green consumerism and cult-like devotion to technology). Having admitted their sins, they discuss the allure of false solutions to our environmental predicaments and how even veteran environmental journalists can be susceptible to it. Stay to the end for thoughts on how to avoid getting hoodwinked by the horde of ecomodernist tech bros who continuously shove unworkable "solutions" down our throats. Originally recorded on January 16, 2025.Warning: This podcast occasionally uses spicy language.Sources/Links/Notes:Julia Musto, "The end of the world as we know it? Theorist warns humanity is teetering between collapse and advancement," Independent, January 13, 2025 (about Nahfeez Ahmed's take on superabundance versus collapse).Rob Dietz, "Chris Smaje Vs. George Monbiot and the Debate on the Future of Farming," Resilience, October 27, 2023.Crazy Town episode 32 on cognitive biasMegan Phelps-Roper's six questionsCrazy Town episode 45 on feedback loops, featuring an interview with Beth SawinPost Carbon Institute's Deep Dive on building emotional resilienceSupport the show

SummaryCarolina and Vidhya reflect on individualism and interrogate how it shows up in our personal lives and is built into our work—including NPIC and evaluation's training, practice, and literature as well as existing field-building and change efforts.⁠⁠Episode 7 TRANSCRIPTNotes02:17 “Utopia” asperceived or portrayed by dominating forces11:55 Concentric circles still center the individual and nuclear family, unlike the more web-like nature of many kinship structures around the world, including South Asia and West Africa.21:45 Others may counter that democratic governance structures had existed among peoples in Africa, the Americas, and Asia before the European Enlightenment. See more⁠here⁠.29:22 The programs that Roosevelt and Johnson instituted were systematically eroded throughout the 1980s as “personal responsibility” replaced “rugged individualism.” See morehere.38:36 The setup is that colonial and capitalist destruction of our lands, economies, and social structures leads us to seek opportunities to fulfill our dreams—or simply survive—elsewhere. See morehere.41:37 The artist did not want to ruin her child's innocence—it was an act of resistance and demonstration of sovereignty to have her child grow up in a way that was not defined by colonization and racism. See morehere.ResourcesThe Origins of “Pull Yourself Up By Your Bootstraps”The Dust BowlHuck's Ironic CircleIndividualism and Opposition to Redistribution in the USThere's No Such Thing as a “Self-Made Man”BootstrappedThe Role of Complexity Studies in the Emerging “Processual” WorldviewA Processual Approach to Political ViolenceTime and ProcessHistorical Determinism RevisitedSocial, Political and Cultural Dimensions of HealthUnderstanding the Connection Between Political and Social Determinants of HealthBronfenbrenner's Ecological Systems TheorySystems Thinking and RaceKinship pathways: Nurturing and Sustaining Resilient, Responsible, and Respected Indigenous EvaluatorsThe Moral Philosophy of IndividualismIndividualism, Innovation, and Long-Run GrowthIndividualism: A Deeply American PhilosophyPolitical PhilosophyIdeologies of the IndividualDefining SocialismCommunist ManifestoThe Interstate agePlessy's LegacyLand Acquisition and DispossessionThe Short‑Lived Promise of ‘40 Acres and a Mule'Natural RightsIndividualism vs CollectivismAge of ReasonThe Declaration of IndependenceJohn Stuart MillUnderstanding Power through Advocacy, Organizing, and ActivismLabor MovementThe 5 Basic Steps to Organizing a UnionDirect Action OrganizingThe Right to StrikeHistory of Successful BoycottsWhat Makes a Successful Protest?The Fight for RightsHerbert Hoover SpeechStock Market Crash of 1929From Rugged Individualism to Rugged CooperationRoosevelt and the New DealThe Rise of Antislavery ThoughtsYears of Adventure 1874-1914The rise and fall of Andrew MellonHow Three Families Shielded their Fortunes from Taxes for GenerationsWhy Social Security was the Cornerstone of FDR's New DealGreat Society Programs, Definition & LBJThe Unusual Ways Western Parents Raise ChildrenNorth American Culture: Undermining BreastfeedingThis is the Closest Thing We've Ever Had to a Hillary Clinton Political ManifestoMargaret ThatcherHealth Promotion and the Knowledge-Attitude-Behavior ContinuumSocial ContractExploring African Relational Ethic of UbuntuMarv AlkinEvaluation RootsEvaluation Roots: An International PerspectiveManifest DestinyEvaluation Roots: A Wider Perspective of Theorists' Views and InfluencesKinnectEmbedding the Graduate Education Diversity Internship Program Within a Larger SystemMusic“Inspired” Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com) ⁠⁠Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 4.0⁠⁠Contact:⁠⁠https://themay13group.net⁠⁠⁠Carolina:https://www.linkedin.com/in/carodela⁠⁠⁠Vidhya:https://www.linkedin.com/in/vidhyashanker⁠⁠Donate!https://the-may-13-group.raiselysite.com

Recreating Songs Quickly, Instrument Retirement, & Music Theory that Makes No Sense! Video Podcast: https://forum.ukuleleunderground.com/threads/trolling-music-nerds-sharp-1-the-ukulele-underground-podcast-151.167784/ How do we go from a Sitcom Opening to Enraging Music Theory Nerds? Along the way, Aldrine answers how he's able to give efficient feedback, and recreate a song after only seeing/hearing it once. Someone asks when should you retire an instrument, and Mike gives some examples of musicians "Retiring" their instruments out of sentimentality. Aldrine and Aaron show their own battle worn ukuleles. The guys offer some playing advice and general tips for how to self diagnose your own playing roadblocks. The crew discuss the benefits of learning to play instruments in the modern age, and why a guitar player disguised as a ukulele teacher is a red flag. At the end of the podcast, Aldrine derails the show with a "Music Theory" question to intentionally rile up Theorist.

123124 Scott Adams Show, Happy New Year, End of Woke, Speaker Johnson, Conspiracy Theorists vs Journalists

Farmer is the Baillie Gifford Professor of Complex Systems at Oxford's Institute for New Economic Thinking. Before joining Oxford in 2012, he worked at Los Alamos National Laboratory and the Santa Fe Institute, where he studied complex systems and economic dynamics. During the 1990s, he took a break from academia to run a successful quantitative trading firm using statistical arbitrage strategies.Farmer has been a pioneer in chaos theory and complexity economics, including the development of agent-based models to understand economic phenomena. His work spans from housing markets to climate change, and he recently authored Making Sense of Chaos exploring complexity science and economic modeling.In This Episode* What is complexity economics? (1:23)* Compliment or replacement for traditional economics (6:55)* Modeling Covid-19 (11:12)* The state of the science (15:06)* How to approach economic growth (20:44)Below is a lightly edited transcript of our conversation. What is complexity economics? (1:23)We really can model the economy as something dynamic that can have its own business cycles that come from within the economy, rather than having the economy just settle down to doing something static unless it's hit by shocks all the time, as is the case in mainstream models.Pethokoukis: What does the sort of economics that people would learn, let's say, in the first year of college, they might learn about labor and capital, supply-demand equilibrium, rational expectations, maybe the importance of ideas. How does that differ from the kind of economics you are talking about? Are you looking at different factors?Farmer: We're really looking at a completely different way of doing economics. Rather than maximizing utility, which is really the central conceptual piece of any standard economic model, and writing down equations, and deducing the decision that does that, we simulate the economy.We assume that we identify who the agents in the and economy are, who's making the decisions, what information do they have available, we give them methods of making the decisions — decision-making rules or learning algorithms — and then they make decisions, those decisions have economic impact, that generates new information, other information may enter from the outside, they make decisions, and we just go around and around that loop in a computer simulation that tries to simulate what the economy does and how it works.You've been writing about this for some time. I would guess — perhaps I'm wrong — that just having more data and more computer power has been super helpful over the past 10 years, 20 years.It's been super helpful for us. We take much more advantage of that than the mainstream does. But yes, computers are a billion times more powerful now than they were when Herb Simon first suggested this way of doing things, and that means the time is ripe now because that's not a limiting factor anymore, as it was in the past.So if you're not looking at capital and labor per se, then what are the factors you're looking at?Well, we do look at capital and labor, we just look at them in a different way. Our models are concerned about how much capital is there to invest, what labor is available. We do have to assign firms production functions that tells, given an amount of capital and labor and all their other inputs, how much can the firms produce? That part of the idea is similar. It's a question of the way the decision about how much to produce is made, or the way consumers decide how much to consume, or laborers decide at what price to provide their labor. All those parts are different.Another difference — if I'm understanding it correctly — is, rather than thinking about economies that tend toward equilibrium and focusing how outside shocks may put an economy in disequilibrium, you're looking a lot more at what happens internally. Am I correct?We don't assume equilibrium. Equilibrium, it has two senses in economics: One is supply equals demand. We might or might not run a model where we assume that. In many models we don't, and if that happens, that's great, but it's an outcome of the model rather than an assumption we put in at the beginning.There's another sense of equilibrium, which is that everybody's strategy is lined up. You've had time to think about what you're doing, I've had time to think about what I'm doing, we've both come to the optimal decision for each of us to make, taking the other one into account. We don't assume that, as standard models typically do. We really can model the economy as something dynamic that can have its own business cycles that come from within the economy, rather than having the economy just settle down to doing something static unless it's hit by shocks all the time, as is the case in mainstream models. We still allow shocks to hit our models, but the economy can generate dynamics even without those shocks.This just popped in my head: To whom would this model make more intuitive sense, Karl Marx or Adam Smith?Adam Smith would like these models because they really allow for emergent behavior. That is, Smith's whole point was that the economy is more than the sum of its parts, that we get far more out of specializing than we do out of each acting like Robinson Crusoes. Our way of thinking about this gets at that very directly.Marx might actually like it too, perhaps for a different reason. Marx was insightful in understanding the economy as being like, what I call in the book, the “metabolism of civilization.” That is, he really did recognize the analogy between the economy and the metabolism, and viewed labor as what we put together with natural resources to make goods and services. So those aspects of the economy are also embodied in the kind of models we're making.I think they both like it, but for different reasons.Compliment or replacement for traditional economics (6:55)There are many problems where we can answer questions traditional methods can't even really ask.The way I may have framed my questions so far is that you are suggesting a replacement or alternative. Is what you're suggesting, is it one of those things, or is it a compliment, or is it just a way of looking at the world that's better at answering certain kinds of questions?I think the jury is out to find the answer to that. I think it is certainly a compliment, and that we're doing things very differently, and there are some problems where this method is particularly well-suited. There are many problems where we can answer questions traditional methods can't even really ask.That said, I think time will tell to what extent this replaces the traditional way of doing economics. I don't think it's going to replace everything that's done in traditional economics. I think it could replace 75 percent of it — but let me put an asterisk by that and say 75 percent of theory. Economists do many different things. One thing economists do is called econometrics, where they take data and they build models just based on the data to infer things that the data is telling them. We're not talking about that here. We're talking about theories where economists attempt to derive the decisions and economic outcomes from first principles based on utility maximization. That's what we're talking about providing an alternative to. The extent to which it replaces that will be seen as time will tell.When a big Wall Street bank wants to make a forecast, they're constantly incorporating the latest jobless claims numbers, industrial production numbers, and as those numbers get updated, they change their forecasts. You're not using any of that stuff?Well, no. We can potentially could ingest any kind of data about what's going on.But they're looking at big, top-down data while you're bottom-up, you're sort of trying to duplicate the actual actors in the economy.That is true, but we can adjust what's at the bottom to make sure we're matching initial conditions. So if somebody tells us, “This is the current value of unemployment,” we want to make sure that we're starting our model out, as we go forward, with the right level of unemployment. So we will unemploy some of the households in our model in order to make sure we're matching the state of unemployment right now and then we start our simulation running forward to see where the economy goes from here.I would think that the advent of these large language models would really take this kind of modeling to another level, because already I'm seeing lots of papers on their ability to . . . where people are trying to run experiments and, rather than using real people, they're just trying to use AI people, and the ability to create AI consumers, and AI in businesses — it would have to be a huge advance.Yes. This is starting to be experimented with for what we do. People are trying to use large language models to model how people actually make decisions, or let's say, to simulate the way people make decisions, as opposed to an idealized person that makes perfect decisions. That's a very promising line of attack to doing this kind of modeling.Large language models also can tell us about other things that allow us to match data. For example, if we want to use patents as an input in our modeling — not something we're doing yet, but we've done a lot of studies with patents — one can use large language models to match patents to firms to understand which firms will benefit from the patents and which firms won't. So there are many different ways that large language models are likely to enter going forward, and we're quite keen to take advantage of those.Modeling Covid-19 (11:12)We predicted a 21.5 percent hit to UK GDP in the second quarter of 2020. When the dust settled a year later, the right answer was 22.1. So we got very close.Tell me, briefly, about your work with the Covid outbreak back in 2020 and what your modeling said back then and how well it worked.When the pandemic broke out, we realized right away that this was a great opportunity to show the power of the kind of economic modeling that we do, because Covid was a very strong and very sudden shock. So it drove the economy far out of equilibrium. We were able to predict what Covid would do to the UK economy using two basic ideas: One is, we predicted the shock. We did that based on things like understanding a lot about occupational labor. The Bureau of Labor Statistics compiles tables about things like, in a given occupation, how close together do people typically work? And so we assumed if they worked closer together than two meters, they weren't going to be able to go to their job. That combined with several other things allowed us to predict how big the shock would be.Our model predicted how that shock would be amplified through time by the action of the economy. So in the model we built, we put a representative firm in every sector of the economy and we assumed that if that firm didn't have the labor it needed, or if it didn't have the demand for its product, or if it didn't have the inputs it needed, it wouldn't be able to produce its product and the output would be reduced proportional to any of those three limiting factors.And so we started the model off on Day One with an inventory of inputs that we read out of a table that government statistical agencies had prepared for each sector of the economy. And we then just looked, “Well, does it have the labor? Does it have demand? Does it have the goods?” If yes, it can produce at its normal level. If it's lacking any of those, it's going to produce at a lower level. And our model knew the map of the economy, so it knew which industries are inputs to which other industries. So as the pandemic evolved day by day, we saw that some industries started to run out of inputs and that would reduce their output, which, in turn, could cause other industries to run out of their inputs, and so on.That produced quite a good prediction. We predicted a 21.5 percent hit to UK GDP in the second quarter of 2020. When the dust settled a year later, the right answer was 22.1. So we got very close. We predicted things pretty well, industry by industry. We didn't get them all exactly right, but the mistakes we made averaged out so that we got the overall output right, and we got it right through time.We ran the model on several different scenarios. At the time, this was in April of 2020, the United Kingdom was in a lockdown and they were trying to decide what to do next, and we tested several different scenarios for what they might do when they emerged from the full lockdown. The one that we thought was the least bad was keeping all the upstream industries like mining, and forestry, and so on open, but closing the downstream, customer-facing industries like retail businesses that have customers coming into their shop, or making them operate remotely. That was the one they picked. Already when they picked it, we predicted what would happen, and things unfolded roughly as we suggested they would.The state of the science (15:06)Mainstream models can only model shocks that come from outside the economy and how the economy responds to those shocks. But if you just let the model sit there and nothing changes, it will just settle down and the economy will never change.I'm old enough to remember the 1990s and remember a lot of talk about chaos and complexity, some of which even made it into the mainstream, and Jurassic Park, which may be the way most people heard a little bit about it. It's been 30 years. To what extent has it made inroads into economic modeling at central banks or Wall Street banks? Where's the state of the science? Though it sounds like you're really taking another step forward here with the book and some of your latest research.Maybe I could first begin just by saying that before Jurassic Park was made, I got a phone call and picked up the phone, and the other end of the line said, “Hi, this is Jeff Goldblum, have you ever heard of me?” I said, “Yeah.” And he said, “Well, we're making this movie about dinosaurs and stuff, and I'm going to play a chaos scientist, and I'm calling up some chaos scientists to see how they talk.” And so I talked to Jeff Goldblum for about a half an hour. A few of my other friends did too. So anyway, I like to think I had a tiny little bit of impact on the way he behaved in the movie. There were some parallels that it seemed like he had lifted.Chaos, it's an important underlying concept in explaining why the weather is hard to predict, it can explain some forms of heart arrhythmias, we use it to explain some of the irregular behavior of ice ages. In economics, it was tossed around in the '90s as something that might be important and rejected. As I described in the book, I think it was rejected for the wrong reasons.I'm proposing chaos, the role it plays in here is that, there's a debate about business cycles. Do they come from outside? The Covid pandemic was clearly a business cycle that came from outside. Or do they come from inside the economy? The 2008 financial crisis, I would say, is clearly one that came from inside the economy. Mainstream models can only model shocks that come from outside the economy and how the economy responds to those shocks. But if you just let the model sit there and nothing changes, it will just settle down and the economy will never change.In contrast, the kinds of models we build often show what we call endogenous business cycles, meaning business cycles that the model generates all on its own. Now then, you can ask, “Well, how could it do that?” Well, basically the only plausible way it can do that is through chaos. Because chaos has two properties: One is called sensitive dependence on initial conditions, meaning tiny changes in the present can cause large changes in the future; but the other is endogenous motion, meaning motion that comes from within the system itself, that happens spontaneously, even in very simple systems of equations.Would something like consumer pessimism, would that be an external shock or would something more internal where everybody, they're worried about the futures, then they stop spending as much money? How would that fit in?If the consumer pessimism is due to the fear of a nuclear war, I would say it's outside the economy, and so that's an external shock. But if it's caused by the fact that the economy just took a big nose dive for an internal reason, then it's part of the endogenous dynamicsI spent many years as a journalist writing about why the market's going up, the market's going down, and by the end of the day, I had to come up with a reason why the market moved, and I could — I wasn't always quite confident, because sometimes it wasn't because of a new piece of data, or an earnings report, they just kind of moved, and I had no real reason why, even though I had to come up . . . and of course it was when I was doing that was when people started talking about chaos, and it made a lot of intuitive sense to me that things seem to happen internally in ways that, at least at the time, were utterly unpredictable.Yeah, and in fact, one of the studies I discuss in the book is by Cutler, Poterba, and Summers — the Summers would be Larry Summers — where they did something very simple, they just got the 100 largest moves of the S&P index, they looked up what the news was the next day about why they occurred in the New York Times, and they subjectively marked the ones that they thought were internally driven, versus the ones that were real news, and they concluded they could only find news causes for about a third of them.There is always an explanation in the paper; actually, there is one day on the top 12 list where the New York Times simply said, “There appears to be no cause.” That was back in the '40s, I don't think journalists ever say that anymore. I don't think their paper allows them to do it, but that's probably the right answer about two-thirds of the time, unless you count things like “investors are worried,” and, as I point out in the book, if the person who invests your money isn't worried all the time, then you should fire them because investors should worry.There are internal dynamics to markets, I actually show some examples in the book of simple models that generate that kind of internal dynamics so that things change spontaneously.How to approach economic growth (20:44)I'm not saying something controversial when I say that technological change is the dominant driver of economic growth, at least for the economy as a whole. You recently founded a company, Macrocosm, trying to put some of these ideas to work to address climate change, which would seem to be a very natural use for this kind of thinking. What do you hope to achieve there?We hope to provide better guidance through the transition. We're trying to take the kind of things we've been doing as academics, but scale them up and reduce them to practice so they can be used day-in and day-out to make the decisions that policymakers and businesspeople need to make as the transition is unfolding. We hope to be able to guide policymakers about how effective their policies will be in reducing emissions, but also in keeping the economy going and in good shape. We hope to be able to advise businesses and investors about what investments to make to make a profit while we reduce emissions. And we think that things have changed so that climate change has really become an opportunity rather than a liability.I write a lot about economic growth and try to figure out how it works, what are the key factors. . . What insights can you give me, either on how you think about growth and, since I work at a think tank, the kind of policies you think policy makers should be thinking about, or how should they think about economic growth, since that seems to be on top-of-mind in every rich country in the world right now?I'm not saying something controversial when I say that technological change is the dominant driver of economic growth, at least for the economy as a whole. And we've spent a lot of time studying technological change by just collecting data and looking for the patterns in that data: What does the technology cost through time and how rapidly is it deployed? We've done this for 50 or 60 technologies where we look at past technological transitions, because typically, as a technology is coming in, it's replacing something else that's going out, and what we've seen are a couple of striking things:One is, many technologies don't really improve very much over time, at least in terms of cost. Fossil fuels cost about the same as they did 140 years ago once you adjust for inflation. In fact, anything we mine out of the ground costs about the same as it did a hundred years ago.In contrast, solar energy from solar photovoltaic panels costs 1/10,000th what it did when it was introduced in the Vanguard satellite in 1958. Transistors have been going down at 40 percent per year, so they cost about a billionth of what they did back in 1960. So some technologies really make rapid progress, and the economy evolves by reorganizing itself around the technologies that are making progress. So for example, photography used to be about chemistry and film. Photography now is about solid-state physics because it just unhitched from one wagon and hitched itself to another wagon, and that's what's happening through the energy transition. We're in the process of hitching our wagon to the technologies that have been making rapid progress, like solar energy, and wind energy, and lithium ion batteries, and hydrogen catalyzers based on green energy.I think we can learn a lot about the past, and I think that when we look at what the ride should be like, based on what we understand, we think the transition is going to happen faster than most people think, and we think it will be a net saving of moneySo then how do you deal with a wild card, which I think if you look at the past, nuclear power seems like it's super expensive, no progress being made, but, theoretically, there could be — at least in the United States — there could be lots of regulatory changes that make it easier to build. You have all these venture capital firms pouring money into these nuclear startups with small reactors, or even nuclear fusion. So a technology that seems like it's a mature technology, it might be easy to chart its future, all of a sudden maybe it's very different.I'm not arguing we should get rid of nuclear reactors until they run their normal lifetime and need to be gotten rid of, but I think we will see that that is not going to be the winning technology in the long run, just because it's going to remain expensive while solar energy is going to become dirt cheap.In the early days, nuclear power had faced a very favorable regulatory environment. The first nuclear reactors were built in the '50s. Until Three Mile Island and Chernobyl happened, it was a very regulatorily friendly environment and they didn't come down in cost. Other countries like France have been very pro-nuclear. They have very expensive electricity and will continue to do so.I think the key thing we need to do is focus on storage technologies like green hydrogen. Long-term storage batteries have already come down to a point where they're beginning to be competitive; they will continue to do so. And in the future, I think we'll get solid-state storage that will make things quite cheap and efficient, but I don't think small modular reactors are going to ever be able to catch up with solar and wind at this point.On sale everywhere The Conservative Futurist: How To Create the Sci-Fi World We Were PromisedMicro Reads▶ Economics* United States Economic Forecast - Deloitte* The Hidden Threat to National Security Is Not Enough Workers - WSJ▶ Business* DOGE Can't Do It All. Here's What It Can Do. - Politico* AI Startup Perplexity Closes Funding Round at $9 Billion Value - Bberg▶ Policy/Politics* US Homeland Security chief attacks EU effort to police AI - FT* The Trump Bump: The Republican Fertility Advantage in 2024 - IFS* House unveils AI ‘road map' but punts on setting priorities - Wapo* Did Tariffs Make American Manufacturing Great? - Cato▶ AI/Digital* Call ChatGPT from any phone with OpenAI's new 1-800 voice service - Ars* Homo-Silicus: Not (Yet) a Good Imitator of Homo Sapiens or Homo Economicus - SSRN* Is AI finally ready to replace your doctor? - NS* The Age of Quantum Software Has Already Started - WSJ* This is where the data to build AI comes from - MIT* The New AI Stock Pickers Are Destined to Disappoint - Bberg Opinion▶ Clean Energy/Climate* Fusion Start-Up Plans to Build Its First Power Plant in Virginia - NYT* Will the World's First Nuclear Fusion Power Plant Be Built in Virginia? Here's Why We're Skeptical - SciAm* The deepest hole on Earth: Inside the race to harness unlimited power from our planet's core - SF* Dubai transforms into walkable city with air-conditioned paths - New Atlas* Oklo inks record deal for using nuclear to power data centers - E&E▶ Robotics/AVs* AI Robots Are Coming, and They'll Be Made in Asia - Bberg Opinion▶ Space/Transportation* Boeing Starliner crew's long awaited return delayed to March - Wapo▶ Up Wing/Down Wing* What Could Go Right? The Best News of 2024 - The Progress Network▶ Substacks/Newsletters* Why Don't EU Firms Innovate? The Hidden Costs of Failure - Conversable Economist* Why Did the Industrial Revolution Happen? - Oliver Kim* One Down, Many To Go - Hyperdimensional* The Experience Curve - Risk & Progress* The case for clinical trial abundance - Slow Borin* Nuclear Waste: Yes, In (or Under) My Backyard - Breakthrough Journal* Answer Time: Can We Imagine Pluralistic Futures? - Virginia's Newsletter* What just happened - One Useful ThingFaster, Please! is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit fasterplease.substack.com/subscribe

Gene and Chris introduce John B. Alexander, Ph.D, author of “UFOs: Myths, Conspiracies, and Realities.” He'll discuss his ongoing research, and what the government knows and doesn't know about the subject. So in 1985, Alexander founded the Advanced Theoretical Physics Project, an informal cadre of "government officials" (including "people from the Army, Navy, and Air Force, plus several from the defense aerospace industries and some members from the Intelligence Community") who "took it upon themselves to find out whether there was a secret federal UFO project."Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-paracast-the-gold-standard-of-paranormal-radio--6203433/support.

Carl R. Trueman, a professor at Grove City College and author of "To Change All Worlds," joins us to discuss how the Church's inadequate response to the modern world has contributed to the rise of critical theory in our culture. - - -  Today's Sponsor: PreBorn! - Help save babies from abortion: https://www.preborn.com/Klavan

We finished Season 3 of the Big Bang Theory! We're going to recap and breakdown the Belarus knockoff "The Theorists" and then relive the glory moments of Season 3! 00:00:00 - Intro, emails00:13:00 - The Theorists recap00:45:56 - Season 3 superlatives01:12:34 - Point Talleys and Favorite IQ PointsFind us everywhere at: https://linktr.ee/theoreticalnonsense~~*CLICK THE LINK TO SEE OUR IQ POINT HISTORY TOO! *~~-------------------------------------------------Welcome to Theoretical Nonsense! If you're looking for a Big Bang Theory rewatch podcast blended with How Stuff Works, this is the podcast for you!  Hang out with Rob and Ryan where they watch each episode of The Big Bang Theory and break it down scene by scene, and fact by fact, and no spoilers! Ever wonder if the random information Sheldon says is true? We do the research and find out! Is curry a natural laxative, what's the story behind going postal, are fish night lights real? Watch the show with us every other week and join in on the discussion! Email us at theoreticalnonsensepod@gmail.com and we'll read your letter to us on the show! Even if it's bad! :) Music by Alex Grohl. Find official podcast on Apple and Spotify https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/theoretical-nonsense-the-big-bang-theory-watch-a/id1623079414

Mark McBride, author of "The Yonomicon" and inventor of 3A yo-yoing, discusses the pivotal transition from fixed axle to transaxle yo-yos, which allowed for longer and more complex tricks. He emphasizes the importance of cataloging tricks by breaking them down into fundamental components, introducing holds, moves, and a notation system in his pioneering book on yo-yo theory. The conversation explores adopting a "skateboarding mentality" in yo-yoing, encouraging players to embrace failure and foster creativity. Topics include the evolution of yo-yoing over the past 25 years, the development of new tricks and divisions like 3A, and the significance of symmetry and documentation. They discuss how originality emerges naturally through dedicated practice and the influence of other art forms on yo-yoing. The evolution of 3A is examined, including the yoyos used and the concept of the "five houses of 3A," illustrating how competition trick selection shaped the style's direction. The importance of style, flair, and the early role of contests and clubs in building the yo-yo community is highlighted. Emphasis is placed on grassroots organizing, encouraging individuals to create events and clubs independently without needing permission or significant funding, thereby enriching and expanding the community. Chapters 00:00 Mark's Journey into Yo-Yoing 06:46 The Rise of Fiend Magazine and Mark's Role in the Yo-Yo Community 13:50 Inventing the 3A Division: Mark's Contribution to Yo-Yoing 27:10 The Power of Symmetry and Exploring New Areas in Yo-Yoing 35:38 Mimicking and Replicating Tricks 39:52 The Influence of Scoring Systems 47:08 The Impact of the Internet 56:48 The Origins of 3A 01:10:38 The Evolution of Yoyo Design 01:12:35 The Five Houses of 3A Yoyoing 01:15:59 The Importance of Style and Panache 01:29:00 The DIY Nature of Yoyo Contests 01:37:41 Just Show Up and Do It 01:44:26 The Evolution of Yo-Yo Tricks 01:48:13 The Creation of the Yo-Namacon 01:54:31 The Importance of Community and Balance 02:25:56 Exploring the Stories and Insights of Old and International Yo-Yo Players (these notes are AI generated) --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/kill-your-yoyo/support

These days it can be risky for brands to take a stand on social issues or promote inclusiveness. But if marketers are able to honestly depict the diversity of society in their brand communications, their message has a far greater chance of being heard, according to cultural theorist Anastasia Karklina Gabriel.

On this episode of Nway Bway Micah Mooney and Phillip chat about how Musical Theatre and Worship music have similarities that could help you grow in your relationship with Jesus and breathe new life into your worship! Micah is a Composer and Theorist currently based in Ann Arbor, Michigan, where he is studying to receive his PhD in Music Theory from the University of Michigan. To learn more about Micah and his work check out his website! Website: https://micahmooney.com/ Website: nwaybway.com Instagram: @nwaybway --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/narrow-way-to-broadway/support

Website

**Discussion begins at 11:45**Have you ever seen a bunch of birds lined up on a power line?  Or had a bird poop on your car?   What if I told you that birds were really drones that the US government was using to spy on us?  That those birds lined up on a power line were just recharging?  That birds defecating were really a way for the Government to track them?  Theorists claim that the federal government exterminated 12 billion birds between 1959-1971 and replaced them with drones.  Another 4 billion have been exterminated since then. In fact, some theorists believe that JFKs assassination was actually a result of him refusing to kill the birds.Send us a Text Message.Support the Show.Theme song by INDA

Day 1 is entitled "James Baldwin as a Theorist of Crisis" and discusses how Baldwin's formulations of the crumbling of empire, safety and whiteness can help understand the current moment, engaging with Antonio Gramsci's concept of an interregnum.

Dom Joly is a multi-award winning comedian and the author of several books, including 'The Conspiracy Tourist.' In this episode of the Freedom Pact podcast, Lewis and Dom discuss the world of conspiracy theories and the psychology behind them. Dom shares his fascinating encounters with conspiracy theorists, including a flat earther who he travelled l to 'the edge of the earth' with, and discusses the allure of topics like UFOs and Bigfoot. He also delves into the psychology behind conspiracy theories and the impact of social media algorithms. The guys explore the challenges of debunking conspiracies and the role of experts in countering misinformation. They also touch on the tribalism and belonging that can drive conspiracy theorists, as well as the entertainment value of conspiracy content. Dom shares his experiences with conspiracy theorists during his tour and highlights the absurdity of some theories, including the belief that Finland doesn't exist. Timestamps: 0:00 The World of Conspiracy Theories 03:40 The Yeti & Bigfoot Obsession 05:30 Speaking To Flat Earthers 09:30 UFOs & Aliens 13:25 ‘Square Flat Earth' Theorists 17:40 The Conspiracy Rabbit Hole 20:50 Terrance Howard, Joe Rogan and Eric Weinstein 24:40 The People In Power 26:30 Tribalism & Conspiracy 30:00 Alex Jones 32:30 Taking A Flat Earther To ‘The Edge of The World' 34:00 Finland Doesn't Exist Theory 38:30 Being Heckled By Conspiracy Theorists 40:00 What Makes Life Worth Living? 40:55 Connect With Dom Joly More from Dom including the book and U.K. tour: https://www.domjoly.tv Connect with us: https://freedompact.co.uk/newsletter​ (Healthy, Wealthy & Wise Newsletter) twitter.com/freedompactpod Email: freedompact@gmail.com https://Tiktok.com/personaldevelopment

In this episode I look at Gregory Kavka's 'Hobbes's War of All Against All' in The Social Contract Theorists edited by Christopher W. Morris, with a special focus on the prisoner's dilemma and nation size.

Sean Carroll is a theoretical physicist and cosmologist specializing in dark energy, general relativity, and quantum mechanics. Sean is a research professor at Caltech and a prolific author known for his books "The Big Picture" and "Something Deeply Hidden," which explore the intersection of science, philosophy, and the mysteries of the universe. YouTube Link: https://youtu.be/9AoRxtYZrZo Become a YouTube Member Here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCdWIQh9DGG6uhJk8eyIFl1w/join Patreon: https://patreon.com/curtjaimungal (early access to ad-free audio episodes!) Join TOEmail at https://www.curtjaimungal.org Timestamps: 00:00 - Intro 01:23 - Sean's Current Work (Holographic Principle) 07:02 - Duality in De Sitter Spacetime 14:24 - “Let's Talk About Philosophy” 30:36 - The Crisis in Fundamental Physics 45:02 - Pseudoscience / Heterodox Ideas 50:30 - Unconventional Physics Theories 56:02 - Funding Unconventional Theories 01:00:58 - “The Experimenters Are Guided by Theorists” 01:02:45 - Sean's Latest Paper “Beyond Falsifiability” 01:11:17 - Poetic Naturalism 01:13:00 - Morals, Aesthetics, Philosophy 01:16:44 - Boltzman 01:22:25 - The Big Bang 01:24:58 - Holography / Quantum Gravity 01:28:40 - “Publish or Perish!” 01:33:30 - Dark Matter 01:36:05 - Something New to Blow Your Mind 01:39:22 - Loop Quantum Gravity 01:49:56 - Outro / Support TOE Links: •⁠ ⁠Peter Woit Podcast: https://youtu.be/9z3JYb_g2Qs •⁠ ⁠Peter Woit's Book on "Not Even Wrong" (URL missing) •⁠ ⁠Lee Smolin Podcast: https://youtu.be/uOKOodQXjhc •⁠ ⁠Neil Turok Podcast: https://youtu.be/ZUp9x44N3uE •⁠ ⁠Sean Carroll's "Crisis in Physics" Podcast (URL missing) •⁠ ⁠Sean Carroll's Podcast Channel (URL missing) •⁠ ⁠Sean Carroll's Book on "The Big Picture" (URL missing) •⁠ ⁠Julian Barbour Podcast with Michio Kaku (URL missing) •⁠ ⁠String Theory Iceberg Video: https://youtu.be/X4PdPnQuwjY •⁠ ⁠Economist Article on "Universe is Creaking" (URL missing) •⁠ ⁠Article on Quantum Microtubule Phenomenon: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jpcb.3c07936 •⁠ ⁠Sean Carroll's Article: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/blog/2008/03/06/being-a-heretic-is-hard-work •⁠ ⁠Sean Carroll's Beyond Falsifiability Article: https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.05016 Support TOE: - Patreon: https://patreon.com/curtjaimungal (early access to ad-free audio episodes!) - Crypto: https://tinyurl.com/cryptoTOE - PayPal: https://tinyurl.com/paypalTOE - TOE Merch: https://tinyurl.com/TOEmerch Follow TOE: - NEW Get my 'Top 10 TOEs' PDF + Weekly Personal Updates: https://www.curtjaimungal.org - Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/theoriesofeverythingpod - TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@theoriesofeverything_ - Twitter: https://twitter.com/TOEwithCurt - Discord Invite: https://discord.com/invite/kBcnfNVwqs - iTunes: https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/better-left-unsaid-with-curt-jaimungal/id1521758802 - Pandora: https://pdora.co/33b9lfP - Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/4gL14b92xAErofYQA7bU4e - Subreddit r/TheoriesOfEverything: https://reddit.com/r/theoriesofeverything Join this channel to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCdWIQh9DGG6uhJk8eyIFl1w/join #science #physics #sciencepodcast #science Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

John Milton isn't just the author of Paradise Lost! Raeffe Gibson makes a guest appearance to discuss his role in the English Civil War.

Today's episode is packed with M&A talk, how one YouTuber succeeded at the creator economy, why Twitch is still losing money and an autonomous vehicle company that is making a comeback.First up, Rebecca took a look at fintech giant Stripe's acquisition of four-year-old competitor Lemon Squeezy. The buy will allow Stripe to beef up its merchant of record selling “in a big way,” according to Stripe CEO Patrick Collison. Deal terms weren't disclosed, but Lemon Squeezy has a reputation for turning down other offers, including a $50 million Series A. The company's founder said he was holding out for the right partner to take the business to the next level, and apparently Stripe was it.This comment led Rebecca to explore the idea of M&A as an exit strategy. Does this practice create perverse incentives in venture capital, where investors are becoming more risk-averse and looking for a surer path to regaining capital, at the long-term expense of competition? Other startups have turned down such opportunities so they can go it alone. Just look at Wiz's decision not to get acquired by Google for $23 billion, something we discussed on last Friday's episode. Next, Rebecca touched on MatPat, the first big YouTuber to successfully exit his company, Theorist Media. Matthew Patrick turned his successful video series, The Game Theorists, into a full-fledged media business called Theorist, with 40 million subscribers across channels. But he was getting tired of the ceaseless content uploading, and found a way to convince investors that the business could go on without him. Now, he's in Capitol Hill educating politicians about what creators need to succeed as small businesses. Speaking of creators and acquisitions, Rebecca pulled up a Wall Street Journal report that found that after 10 years, Twitch is still losing Amazon money. Amazon bought Twitch for $1 billion in 2014, but the company still isn't profitable. And will it ever be? Twitch in 2023 generated about $667 million in ad revenue and $1.3 billion in commerce revenue, but that accounted for less than 0.5% of Amazon's total 2023 revenue. Amazon defended its buy, saying Twitch has a long-term path to profitability. But broader trends that seem to favor short-form videos over watching someone play an entire video game live say otherwise. Finally, while we're on the subject of comebacks, autonomous delivery startup Nuro is gearing up for one of its own. Nuro has been quiet for the past year or so after two big rounds of layoffs. Once the darling of the AV industry with over $2 billion in funding from high-profile investors, Nuro was burning money fast as it tried to scale and commercialize all at once. Now, Nuro is back with better AI and a new vehicle, the R3, which it will be testing later this year in the Bay Area and Houston.Equity is TechCrunch's flagship podcast, produced by Theresa Loconsolo, and posts every Monday, Wednesday and Friday. Subscribe to us on Apple Podcasts, Overcast, Spotify and all the casts. You also can follow Equity on X and Threads, at @EquityPod. For the full episode transcript, for those who prefer reading over listening, check out our full archive of episodes over at Simplecast. Credits: Equity is produced by Theresa Loconsolo with editing by Kell. Bryce Durbin is our Illustrator. We'd also like to thank the audience development team and Henry Pickavet, who manages TechCrunch audio products.

Dr. Alexander (Alex) Osterwalder is one of the world's most influential innovation experts, a leading author, entrepreneur and in-demand speaker whose work has changed the way established companies do business and how new ventures get started.Ranked No. 4 of the Thinkers50 list of the most influential management thinkers worldwide, Osterwalder is known for simplifying the strategy development process and turning complex concepts into digestible visual models. He invented the Business Model Canvas, Value Proposition Canvas, and Business Portfolio Map – practical tools that are trusted by millions of business practitioners from leading global companies.Strategyzer, Osterwalder's company, provides online courses, applications, and technology-enabled services to help organizations effectively and systematically manage strategy, growth, and transformation.His books include the international bestseller Business Model Generation, Value Proposition Design: How to Create Products and Services Customers Want, Testing Business Ideas and The Invincible Company. The Profitable NutritionistMore clients, more money, more impact and more freedom without relying on social mediaListen on: Apple Podcasts SpotifySupport the Show.

“concealed it at Mapleton” [SILV]    This month's Mr. Sherlock Holmes the Theorist episode goes back to 1949 to Volume 4, Number 1 of The Baker Street Journal and Jay Finley Christ's article "Silver Blaze: An Identification (as of 1893 A.D.).   Here Christ looks at what contemporary readers of the Strand would have thought of Watson's tale, specifically identifying which horse Silver Blaze was supposed to be. Oh, and for our Patreon and Substack supporters, we have a video version of this episode. It's just a Trifle.     All of our supporters are eligible for our monthly drawings for Baker Street Journals and certain tiers receive thank you gifts. Join our community on Patreon or Substack today. Find Trifles wherever you listen to podcasts.   Links / Notes Jay Finley Christ's article is available through the eBSJ. All of our social links: https://linktr.ee/ihearofsherlock Email us at trifles @ ihearofsherlock.com Join our community on Patreon or Substack to hear bonus material and be eligible for drawings.      Music credits Performers: Uncredited violinist, US Marine Chamber Orchestra  Publisher Info.: Washington, DC: United States Marine Band  Copyright: Creative Commons Attribution 3.0    

Dr. Conrad Webster is a CEO, mental health advocate, critical race theorist, writer, organizer, facilitator, and Professor of Education at the University of Washington Tacoma. Go to www.thejasoncavnessexperience.com for the full episode and other episodes of The Jason Cavness Experience on your favorite platforms. Sponsor CavnessHR delivers HR companies with 49 or fewer people with our HR platform and by providing you access to your own HRBP.  www.CavnessHR.com Partners  Message your customers - https://www.tawk.to/?pid=byo1znq Payroll - https://offers.everee.com/cavness-hr Sales CRM for small business - https://refer.close.com/100cqlbfcgg5 Health Insurance and Benefits - https://www.peoplekeep.com/refer Dr. Webster's Bio Dr. Conrad Webster is a CEO, mental health advocate, critical race theorist, writer, organizer, facilitator, and Professor of Education at the University of Washington Tacoma.  Dr.Webster is currently the Associate Director of TRIO at Seattle College and previously held the position of Racial Equity Advancement Advisor and Project Manager at Seattle Public Schools from 2020 – 2022. Before that, Dr. Webster worked in Washington State community colleges in various roles of retention specialist and racial equity coach from 2013-2016. His research focuses on the exploitation of Black bodies and theorizing and praxis broadly. Areas of specific interest include decolonizing educational leadership and schools and culturally responsive practices for restoring the community for the wounded to heal. Dr. Webster has published his work in leading journals and a number of articles and chapters including his most recent Black Bodies, Dueling Pandemics, and The Hidden Rules For White Profit in The NBA. He is the recipient of the NAMI Washington Bebe Moore Campbell BIPOC Mental Health Award for Distinguished Contributions for creating programs to address the systemic barriers faced by African American/Black identified males in the K-12 school system.  We talked about the following and other items Hurricane Harvey relief efforts and Houston's music scene. Hip-hop artists and their impact, including Tupac, Biggie, Scarface, and Kendrick Lamar.  Hobbies, writing process, and athletic career. Finding purpose and order in life through personal growth and competition. Race equity, Percy Harvin's NFL career, and social media dynamics. Economic inequality and historical oppression in the US. Exploitation of black athletes in the sports industry. Privilege, oppression, and education in various contexts. Teaching methods and reaching diverse students. Race equity and privilege in various communities. Race, adoption, and systemic inequality. Diversity and inclusion in the workplace, with a focus on performative actions and interest conversions. Protests and activism, with critiques of performative actions. Protests, social justice, and personal growth. AI's impact on education and society. Universal basic income, AI, and economic inequality. WNBA players' salaries and opportunities abroad. Healing black men through emotional support. The importance of diversity and uplifting marginalized communities. Educational injustice and marginalization of African Americans and other demographics. Education, toxic masculinity, and socialization. Pursuing a PhD, challenges faced by underrepresented groups in academia. College affordability and student loan debt. Job market and mental health in under 10 words: Mental health support in the workplace. Career goals, parenting, and trust issues. Grief, trauma, and healing after loss. Vulnerability and personal growth in a sensitive and emotionally charged context. Toxic relationships, masculinity, and personal growth. Parenting, success, and diversity in Houston. Community service and mentorship in African American community. Supporting African American boys' mental health. Personal growth, redemption, and urgency for change. Dr. Webster's Social Media  Dr. Webster's LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/conrad-trayvon-webster-edd/ Black Boy Heal: https://theblackboyheal.com/ Dr. Webster's Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/_dr_webster/ Black Boy Heal Apple App: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/black-boy-heal/id6446207633 Black Boy Heal Android App: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.black.blackboy&hl=en&gl=US&pli=1 Dr. Webster's Advice My last advice that I want to give people is, take your dream and put it into action. One of my students, his name is, Brian has an amazing, amazing, amazing story. One of his biggest things I want to show people is how to take that dream and put action behind that dream. But anything that you want to do you have to work for, it's not going to be just given to you. Some people are outliers where it is, but we don't live in an outlier society where 90% of that is happening. So think about your dream, the purpose behind your dream, know that there's going to be order behind that dream in order for you to really commit to it. Once you commit to it, there's gonna be a lot of white noise around you. But you have to learn how to treat that as surface level things and aim high. If you ever need resources, there are people out here for you, such as Black Boy Heal and other community resources.

Alex and Benjamin discuss the work of Michael Pettis, putting him in conversation with older theorists of imperialism like J.A. Hobson and Vladimir Lenin.

Theorists and theories abound in this continuation of Area 51 madness.Theme song written & performed by Miquela DeLeon and Gil Davis.

In 2018, a groundbreaking discovery elevated a fascinating hypothesis when scientists found complex organic molecules in the water plumes bursting from Enceladus, one of Saturn's icy moons. These molecules, essential building blocks for life, suggest that life's ingredients are potentially more widespread than we had previously thought..Imagine tiny organisms, the ultimate hitchhikers, traversing the vastness of space, enduring the cold vacuum and the fiery entry through our atmosphere, to kickstart biology on a blue speck in the universe. It's a theory that turns the origin of life into an intergalactic adventure, suggesting that we, and all life on Earth, might just be aliens after all.This case file, join the Theorists as they sling their primordial ooze and and pump the galaxy full of potential life with the scientific idea of…Panspermia

1987, a tranquil coastal town on the Florida panhandle became the center for one of the most controversial UFO incidents of the decade. Startling photographs taken by local contractor Ed Walters, captured the nation's attention and sparked a frenzy of both skepticism and belief. Walters' vivid images of strange hovering crafts lit by eerie lights became compelling evidence for a case of extraterrestrial visitation.As the story unfolded, more residents came forward with their own sightings, corroborating reports of unusual aerial phenomena over the sleepy town. These testimonies painted a picture of a community unwittingly thrust into the limelight of a UFO sensation, grappling with the implications of what they might truly have witnessed.This case file, join the Theorists as we load up on pocket sand and polish our spinning roundhouse kicks in... The Gulf Breeze UFO incident

1966, beneath the broad blue skies of Melbourne, Australia, a quiet suburb was thrust into the annals of UFO lore. This extraordinary day saw more than 200 students and teachers become inadvertent witnesses to an inexplicable spectacle—an eerie, silver object gliding silently above, then disappearing as quickly as it had appeared.The event sparked a frenzy of activity, with government agents descending on the scene, whispers of cover-ups, and frantic scrambles to explain away the unexplainable. Yet, the incident refuses to be dismissed or forgotten, lingering in the collective memory as a beacon of the unexplained and a symbol of the potential for otherworldly visitation.This case file, join the Theorists as they have a ripsnorter discussing schoolyard flying saucers in…The Westall UFO Event

This case file, join the Theorists tonight, tonight, tonight as they welcome to the show, David Race. The genesis and mastermind of “Monstrosity”, the podcast that navigates the land of confusion where celebrity meets the supernatural. From his time as a huge part of the Howard Stern show in its heyday to a comedy career in L.A. David will bring his invisible touch that will have you enthralled with tales ranging from conversations with showbiz starlets to stark Bigfoot terror. We're calling all stations to get entangled in our conversation with the man on the corner David Race and that's all.

In the shadowy waters of the early 20th century, amidst a world caught between wars and whispers of the mystical, emerged a figure as enigmatic as he was polarizing. A cult leader who would cast a spell over the hearts and minds of his followers, drawing them to the secluded shores of British Columbia, Canada. There, in a haven promised to be utopia, he formed a community rooted in theosophical teachings, esoteric wisdom, and the promise of salvation in tumultuous times.His magnetic charisma and prophetic visions attracted intellectuals, seekers, and adventurers, all thirsting for spiritual awakening and societal escape. But beneath the veneer of enlightenment and collective harmony lurked a darker narrative. Accusations of tyranny, manipulation, and treasures hidden and hoarded began to surface, painting a portrait of a paradise lost.This case file, join the Theorists as we live out our fantasies of dystopian dominatrixes in exploring the history and mystery of... Brother XI

In the gleaming era of modern aviation, a story emerges that casts a long, ominous shadow over the triumphs of technology and innovation. This saga unfurls as a stark exposition of corporate greed clashing with the sanctity of human life, where the relentless pursuit of market dominance and profit margins spirals into a catastrophic narrative.At the heart of this dark chapter lies the 737 Max, Boeing's flagship response to the competitive pressures of the aerospace industry. Yet, hidden beneath its cutting-edge façade, a sinister reality lurked: a fatally flawed flight control system, the consequence of a corporate ethos where expedience trumped safety, and crucial checks were bypassed in a rush to market.The tragic loss of 346 souls in two preventable disasters laid bare a chilling truth: a corporate colossus, once revered as a paragon of engineering excellence, had sacrificed integrity at the altar of ambition.This case file, join the Theorists as they prepare for takeoff and navigate through the turbulent skies of corporate conspiracy in…Boeing Down: The 737 Max Saga

Catch a weekly LIVE every Sunday at 630PM PST on all Alien Theorists Theorizing Socials!This week The Theorists discuss-A UK Ufo retrieval- Lake Lanier Waterpark- Reverend says Bear Fu****g Nephilim created bigfoot

Catch a weekly LIVE every Sunday at 630PM PST on all Alien Theorists Theorizing Socials!This week The Theorists discuss-The Greatest Discovery in History (Tridactyl Alien Mummies)-The Gruesome Twosome's Top 10 Cryptids-Kelly–Hopkinsville Cryptid* encounter

In the simmering heat of the 1950s, amidst the Cold War and the dawn of the Space Age, an ordinary man found himself at the center of an extraordinary tale that would become a cornerstone of UFO lore. This fantastical UFO encounter, marked by its detailed narratives and peculiar friendships, unfolded not only in the hidden depths of a remote desert, but in the vivid expanse of the man's everyday life, making it one of the most intriguing episodes of contactee history.He claimed to have been visited multiple times by beings from the planet that is invisible to Earth's telescopes due to its counter-Earth orbit. His accounts of conversations with the ship's captain, blurred the lines between personal revelation and interstellar diplomacy, offering insights into a world concerned with Earth's nuclear folly and advocating for peace and mutual understanding.This case file, joi the Theorists as they  journey back to a time of saucers and secrets, exploring the nuances and narratives of... The Truman Bethurum Encounter

Catch a weekly LIVE every Sunday at 630PM PST on all Alien Theorists Theorizing Socials!This week The Theorists discuss-Ryan Garcia Gin Fizzy fueled Boho Grove rant -The beast of Busco which is basically a 500lbs Snapping Turtle-This weeks guest Jaeger teaches us a bit about Jack Unterweger

In the tumultuous wake of a global pandemic, as societies grapple with unprecedented challenges and the call for transformative change echoes around the world, a concept emerges from the corridors of power and influence. This initiative, championed by the World Economic Forum, proposes a radical overhaul of the global economy, society, and our relationship with the planet, aiming to forge a path toward a more sustainable, equitable future.As the blueprint unfolds, it ignites a firestorm of debate and speculation. Proponents hail it as a visionary roadmap to avert climate catastrophe, redress economic disparity, and rebuild the social contract, while critics decry it as a blueprint for reshaping the world order under the guise of crisis management.This case file, join the Theorists on a journey into the depths of this pivotal moment in history, exploring the contours, critiques, and controversies of... The Great Reset

Catch a weekly LIVE every Sunday at 630PM PST on all Alien Theorists Theorizing Socials!This week The Theorists discuss-UFO Cow boys-Deer eating witches caught on tape-Dan's Danaconda

In the twilight of the 19th century, as the world stood on the precipice of the technological revolution, the skies above America became the canvas for one of the most captivating mysteries of the age. Before the Wright brothers took flight, before the modern age of aviation dawned, citizens across the country reported seeing strange vessels cruising the heavens, adorned with powerful searchlights and otherworldly designs.These sightings, emerging from the fog of history, paint a picture of a nation gripped by wonder and fear. Eyewitness accounts describe airships of fantastic proportions and capabilities, far beyond the era's known technological achievements.From California to Chicago, the sky was alive with tales of encounters and abductions, of mysterious pilots conveying messages of peace and warnings for humanity.This case file, join the Theorists as they ascend into the clouds of the past, navigating through the lore and legend of... The Great Airship Mystery

Nestled in the heart of Mexico, amidst the arid plains of Acámbaro, lies a mystery as perplexing as it is provocative. Discovered in the mid-20th century, a collection of thousands of ceramic artifacts challenged the very foundations of prehistoric chronology. Depicting a bizarre array of creatures that resemble dinosaurs, alongside humans in seemingly contemporary attire, these figures suggest an impossible coexistence that defies the established timeline of natural history.The discovery, initially met with intrigue and excitement, soon became the center of controversy and skepticism. Mainstream science dismisses the figures as elaborate hoaxes, yet certain enigmatic qualities of the collection resist such easy explanations.This case file, join the Theorists as we dig into the dirt and dust off the disbelief and enjoy some tasteful dino-erotica in…The Mystery of the Acámbaro Figures

Catch a weekly LIVE every Sunday at 630PM PST on all Alien Theorists Theorizing Socials! This week The Theorists discuss-Starship Troopers trending on X-Grafton Monster festival-Why you should always date up on the evolutionary chart

In the swirling turmoil of the 1960s, a narrative darker and more intricate than previously imagined begins to emerge, casting shadows over the era's most infamous of crimes. A web of intrigue that suggests the possibility of Charles Manson, the murderous cult leader, being manipulated by forces far more sophisticated than the traditional narrative leads us to believe.From the depths of MKUltra's mind-control experiments to shadowy figures operating behind the scenes, hints of a sinister confluence of interests, where the counterculture movement and covert government experiments on mind control eerily overlap. Were the horrific acts, perpetrated by Manson's followers the outcome of a twisted ideology, or were they manipulated by unseen hands, skilled in the art of psychological warfare?This case file, join the Theorists as they dig into the dark dialogue of this chilling chronicle, exploring the sinister symbiosis between cult dynamics and secret government projects, in…The MK Ultra-Charles Manson Connection

Catch a weekly LIVE every Sunday at 630PM PST on all Alien Theorists Theorizing Socials!This week The Theorists discuss-Bill Carson and the ultimate evil-Bendy Spoons-Friends of History