Podcasts about Fukushima

Detailing the odd Japanese case of the Fukushima Toilet Death and the conspiracy theories that followed, ranging from village and work tensions to a political coverup.Support us directly: https://www.redwebpod.comOn a cold, winter day in Japan, a woman settled into her quarters after a long day of teaching. However, her evening would be anything but peaceful. In her toilet, she would find a floating shoe, one that she would discover belonged to the deceased man trapped inside her septic tank. What unfolded after that led to local unrest and conspiracy theories denying the official story. Today, we're investigating the Fukushima Toilet Death.Sensitive topics: Mentions of suicide, voyeurismOur sponsors:Factor - Head to http://Factormeals.com/redweb50off and use code redweb50off to get 50% off and free daily greens per box!Rocket Money - Let Rocket Money help you reach your financial goals faster. Join at http://rocketmoney.com/REDWEBQuince - Go to http://quince.com/redweb for free shipping and 365-day returns.This show is brought to you by BetterHelp. Sign up and get 10% off at http://BetterHelp.com/redweb Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

On this episode of Japan Station, we're talking about Fukushima Prefecture! We're focusing on the geography, cultural quirks, language and food.

On this episode of The Unfinished Print: A Mokuhanga Podcast, I have the opportunity to speak with Kazuko Hioki, Head of Preservation and Preservation Librarian/Conservator at the University of Hawai'i at Mānoa. We discuss how washi was used in book preservation during the Edo period in Japan, its connection to mokuhanga, and the many ways washi was used during this period of Japanese paper history, including recycled paper practices, traditional papermaking methods, and the role of washi in book creation. Notes: may contain a hyperlink. Simply click on the highlighted word or phrase. Kazuko Hioki - here are some of Kazuko Hioki's articles where you can read and get a real understanding of her work.  Investigation of Historical Japanese Paper: An Experiment to Recreate Recycled Paper from 18th-19th Century Japan   Characteristics of Japanese Block Printed Books in the Edo Period: 1603–1867 Tamarind Institute - was originally founded in Los Angeles in 1960 by June Wayne, and is a world renowned center for fine art lithography. Established to revive and sustain the art of lithography, which was in decline in the United States, Tamarind quickly became a leader in the education and promotion of lithographic techniques. In 1970, the institute moved to the University of New Mexico in Albuquerque, where it continues to thrive as a key institution in the printmaking world. Dedicated to advancing the lithographic arts through rigorous education, collaborative projects, and the production of high-quality prints, the Tamarind Institute's influence extends globally, contributing significantly to the development and appreciation of lithography as a vibrant art form. More info, here.    Edo Bakufu, also known as the Tokugawa Bakufu, was the military government that ruled Japan from 1603 to 1868. During this period, Japan experienced remarkable political stability and economic growth, maintained through a strict social hierarchy and a system that required regional lords (daimyo) to alternate their residence between their domains and Edo. The Edo Bakufu fostered an environment in which culture, education, literature, theatre, and urban centres flourished. The bakufu came to an end with the Meiji Restoration in 1868, which restored imperial rule and marked the beginning of Japan's modernization.   Tohoku Region - is a region in Northern Japan which consists of six prefectures which are Aomori, Akita, Iwate, Yamagata, Miyagi and Fukushima.    Tosa, Kōchi - is a city located on Shikoku island, in the prefecture of Kōchi. Ki no Tsurayuki (872-945) was a court noble promoted as provincial governor of Tosa and promoted washi. More info can be found, here.    Eta -  were one of the outcaste groups of Edo-period Japan. Associated with occupations involving animal carcasses, leather production, butchery, and executions, they were marginalized within the social hierarchy. Their descendants are today generally referred to as Burakumin.   kusazōshi - were popular illustrated books made during the Edo Period combining text and imagery.    gōkan - were a type of kusazōshi popular in late Edo-period Japan. Longer and more complex than earlier forms, they featured historical tales, adventure stories, romances, and popular fiction. Their illustrations also highlighted the craftsmanship of the artists, carvers, and printmakers who produced them.   © Popular Wheat Productions logo designed and produced by Douglas Batchelor and André Zadorozny  Introduction music while working - Lester Young / Oscar Peterson  Disclaimer: Please do not reproduce or use anything from this podcast without shooting me an email and getting my express written or verbal consent. I'm friendly :)  

WBS: New Studio For Me #363 -- The gang is at it again. Brimstone is joined by his wing-man Alex DaPonte and his wife Danielle as they chat about Hell being up for sale, why they should buy it, and how Brim would run in. They chat about the new updates in the studio, mutant super pigs near Fukushima Japan, and the Disney guest who jumped off the Kilimanjaro Safari to take a leak. They discuss the Jim Henson Creature Workshop being open to the public now and Stephen Colbert trolls Trump with new Monroe Public Access show. Brim explains what gets Within Brim's Skin.

Documentary filmmaker Ivy Meeropol (“Bully. Coward. Victim.: The Story of Roy Cohn”, “After The Bite”) returns for her 3rd visit to the podcast. Her latest film “Ask E. Jean” which recently had a very successful festival run and is currently in theaters. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SgyI8GStcao Ivy Meeropol is the Director and Producer of “Ask E. Jean”, a feature documentary film about the advice columnist and journalist E. Jean Carroll who sued Donald Trump for rape and defamation and won. In 2023, she completed “After The Bite” (HBO), a feature documentary about the explosion of great white sharks and seals on Cape Cod. She premiered her HBO documentary “Bully. Cward. Victim.: The Story of Roy Cohn” at the 2019 New York Film Festival and in 2020 the film was nominated for an Emmy for Outstanding Historical Documentary. She was the Senior Story Producer on the CNNFilms documentary “The End: Inside the Last Days of the Obama White House” , which premiered at the National Archives in Washington, DC. She directed and produced the feature “Indian Point”, about an aging nuclear power plant close to New York City, which was honored with the Frontline Award for Journalism in a Documentary Film and aired on NHK during the anniversary of Fukushima in Japan. Ivy created and directed the 6-part nonfiction series “The Hill” (Sundance Channel), about Congressman Robert Wexler (D-FL) and his young staff (nominated for best series by the International Documentary Association). She produced the feature documentary “Museum Town”, which premiered at SxSW, and has produced and directed for the Emmy Award winning climate change series “Years of Living Dangerously” (National Geographic) and for “Death Row Stories” (CNN). Ivy's debut film, “Heir to an Execution” (HBO), explored the legacy of her grandparents Ethel and Julius Rosenberg. It premiered at Sundance and was shortlisted for an Academy Award. She is a member of the Academy of Motion Pictures Arts & Sciences and serves on the Professional Advisory Board of The Jacob Burns Film Center.

aixe o material deste episódio: https://forms.gle/hT5RCd4985R5ueej8Seja bem-vindo ao Geopolítica em Campo, o podcast dedicado a analisar o mundo através das quatro linhas. Por aqui, geopolítica, história, cultura e atualidades são exploradas a fundo, revelando as relações de poder que movem o planeta.Se você deseja uma visão ainda mais aprofundada sobre a geopolítica mundial e assuntos da atualidade – seja você estudante, educador, professor ou entusiasta – considere apoiar o nosso trabalho. Nossos assinantes têm acesso a aulas e materiais exclusivos dentro do curso Geopolítica e Atualidades, um conteúdo riquíssimo e aprofundado.Acesse https://pay.hotmart.com/P104984502P?checkoutMode=10 e junte-se a nós!Neste episódio, o nosso Airbus da geopolítica decola para desvendar os segredos do Grupo F, analisando a fundo dois gigantes globais da tecnologia, da história e do futebol: os Países Baixos e o Japão. Embarque conosco nessa viagem onde cruzamos as quatro linhas para entender como os holandeses desafiaram o oceano com uma engenharia admirável, construíram o porto de Rotterdam e se tornaram uma potência agrícola e tecnológica com a gigante dos chips ASML. Também relembramos as grandes batalhas históricas da seleção laranja contra o Brasil em 94 e 98, a genialidade tática de Johan Cruyff e a mística da "Laranja Mecânica", consolidada como uma verdadeira potência do futebol mesmo sem levantar uma taça de Copa do Mundo. Do outro lado do mapa, desvendamos o renascimento econômico do Japão no pós-guerra através do modelo toyotista, do Plano Colombo e de uma automação industrial cirúrgica criada para enfrentar seus complexos desafios demográficos. Por fim, debatemos a impressionante resiliência da sociedade japonesa diante de vulcões, tufões e abalos tectônicos, analisando os desdobramentos geopolíticos globais provocados pelo desastre nuclear de Fukushima nas matrizes energéticas mundiais.Prepare o seu bilhete alaranjado e venha "farmar aura" de conhecimento com os professores João Marcelo, Juninho Lopes e Bernardo Mesquita.

Our guests on the podcast today are two leading experts of Asia security issues, in Wellington NZ for the Asia Symposium hosted by the Asia New Zealand Foundation. This episode's a deep dive on Asia politics, and replete with the various associated acronyms. So if you aren't familiar with The IP4, The Quad, or ASEAN and Japan's OSA - a quick Google of the terms will make for a more rewarding listen.Tweet us at @AsiaMediaCentreWebsite asiamediacentre.org.nz Email us at media@asianz.org.nzWhakawhetai mo te whakarongo .. thanks for listening !

BEST OF: With the exception of military records or a few popular cases, UFO research often gets drawn into an America-centric sphere. Because of this, or other reasons too, the phenomenon is received internationally with heavy reliance on US news and reports. But according to the US Department of Defense in 2023, Japan is a leading hotspot for UFOs as well. In June 2024, the Japanese government launched an 80-person nonpartisan group, including former defense ministers, to study UAP. Japan has three major UFO cases, named after regional areas - Kofu, Kochi, and Hokkaido - but also has mysterious stories like the Utsuro-Bune and the abundance of objects spotted over the Daiichi power plant after the 2011 disaster. Japan also has a Roswell, and a Sedona, in regard to UFO popularity and vortexes. The town is called Iinomachi in Fukushima Prefecture, just outside Fukushima city. Objects and lights have been seen here since at least the 1970s. Just north of the town in the dense forest is the IINO UFO MUSEUM, home to documents, replicas, and books on the subject. Outside is a flying saucer bus stop. Above the museum is Mount Senganmori, which features magnetic anomalies and little alien carvings along its trail. Few know that the Roswell research center and museum, founded in 1991, was not the first of its kind; Kinichi Arai, a Japanese man, formerly in the military, who died in 2002, began the first of its kind museum and research facility in 1979.*The is the FREE archive, which includes advertisements. If you want an ad-free experience, you can subscribe below underneath the show description.

Alina Voss from NX Atomics stops by the Energy News Beat PodcastThe title “The Math Ain't Mathing: Why America Needs Nuclear Now” was derived from a comment Alina made on the podcast. I was very impressed, and as we talked, she made some great points. I am going to follow up with her company and introduce them to some folks.We need to have more nuclear reactors online tomorrow, and we need real solutions.1. Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) and NX AtomicsThe core focus of the conversation centers on NX Atomics' development of small modular nuclear reactors. Key points include:NX Atomics aims to produce the cheapest SMRs on the market (targeting $20 per megawatt hour vs. $90 for traditional Gen 3 reactors)They're targeting a prototype by 2030 and first-of-a-kind deployment in the early 2030sThe company employs German nuclear engineers with 10-15 years of research backgroundThey're using innovative 3D metal printing technology to manufacture reactor components more efficiently and affordably2. Data Centers and Energy DemandA significant discussion about the explosive growth of data centers and their energy requirements:Data centers are increasingly competing with farmland for space in the MidwestTexas ERCOT has 220 gigawatts of applications for new data center power, but only 54 gigawatts of peak capacityData centers are using eminent domain to acquire land, displacing long-time residentsSMRs and data centers are positioned as complementary solutions (”go together like PB&J”)3. Nuclear Energy's Public Perception and MarketingAlina discusses the challenge of rebranding nuclear energy:Older generations associate nuclear with bombs and warGen X often thinks of disasters (Three Mile Island, Fukushima, Chernobyl)Younger generations, especially men, are more pro-nuclearLiving near a nuclear plant exposes you to less radiation than eating a banana annuallyNuclear plants have high approval ratings among nearby residents4. Energy Policy and SubsidiesCritical examination of current U.S. energy policies:Wind and solar have been artificially inflated by subsidies and can't compete on their own meritsWind turbines last only 8 years; solar panels last ~15 years and 95% end up in landfillsThe farm bill subsidizes ethanol, which is counterproductive (takes more energy to produce than it yields)Ethanol damages vehicles and reduces fuel efficiency by ~4 miles per gallonThe need to reform subsidies to support more sustainable, long-term energy solutions5. Global Energy Competition and ChinaDiscussion of geopolitical energy dynamics:China is rapidly expanding nuclear capacity (50+ reactors with 20+ more planned)The U.S. has 94 reactors and is falling behindIP theft and supply chain vulnerabilities are critical concernsEnergy independence and dominance are central to future global competitivenessSecretary Chris Wright's pro-nuclear stance is seen as crucial for U.S. energy policy6. Transmission Infrastructure and Grid ChallengesThe underlying infrastructure problem:Aging transmission infrastructure is a bottleneck for moving power from generation to demandThis is a bigger issue than just generation capacitySMRs offer distributed generation that can bypass some transmission challenges7. Regenerative Agriculture and Land UseBrief but important discussion about sustainable farming:Current agricultural policies favor monoculture corn production with heavy chemical inputsRegenerative agriculture and sustainable land management are better for both economics and healthThe tension between subsidizing farmland for food vs. for energy productionWe are seeing that Data Centers, AI, Wind, Solar, and Agriculture are more closely aligned than you can imagine. Land and water grabs are ongoing in the U.S., and they are second only to the political corruption we are seeing in our systems.We covered the Levelized Cost of Energy and the importance of its design. I loved the fact that they are 3D printing and getting the system designed faster rather than laterCheck out their website: https://www.nxatomics.com/Connect with Alina on her LinkedIn here: https://www.linkedin.com/in/alinavoss/It would be fun to get Alina and Grace Vanderhei (Stankie), who was on the podcast as a former Miss America and a nuclear engineer, together to discuss the future of nuclear.This week, I reached out to John Rich to get him on the podcast. While it is a long shot, we need all of the air cover we can get to protect our farmers, farmland, and people's homes from the Wild West of Data centers being overrun by eminent domain on people's homes and farms.We need more future leaders and companies like Alina and NX Atomics.Check out the Energy News Beat SubStack https://theenergynewsbeat.substack.com/A shout-out to Steve Reese and the Reese Energy Consulting group for sponsoring the Podcast https://reeseenergyconsulting.com/.Data2 if you have any business systems, can you trust A? Well, they have the patent on validation. . https://data2.zoholandingpage.com/energyAnd we have WellDatabase rolling in as a new sponsor. https://welldatabase.com/

durée : 00:30:00 - Au rythme du vivant - par : Aurélie Luneau - Comment la vie sauvage résiste-t-elle à la radioactivité à Fukushima ? L'éthologue Matthieu Lihoreau partage ses recherches sur les abeilles et les frelons dans cet environnement contaminé, révélant des altérations de leurs capacités cognitives. - réalisation : Charlotte Roux, Célestine Babinet, Annelise Signoret, Olivier Martinaud Vous aimez ce podcast ? Pour écouter tous les épisodes sans limite, rendez-vous sur Radio France

Julien Villeret dirige l'innovation du groupe EDF, on s'est retrouvés un jour de pluie, ce qui tombait plutôt bien pour parler d'énergie. Julien est l'un de ces rares interlocuteurs capables de parler du mix énergétique français sans perdre la nuance ni tomber dans le discours institutionnel. Il connaît le sujet de l'intérieur, et il n'a pas peur d'aller là où ça grince.Dans cet épisode, nous parlons de nucléaire, bien sûr, mais aussi de ce qu'on ne comprend pas sur l'électricité en général. J'ai questionné Julien sur les déchets nucléaires (leur volume réel vous va surprendre), sur les compétences qu'on a perdues en arrêtant de construire des centrales, sur pourquoi une voiture électrique en Allemagne, c'est techniquement une voiture au charbon, et sur l'hydrogène, qu'on nous vend comme la grande révolution alors que la réalité est beaucoup plus complexe.On parle aussi de fusion nucléaire, de SMR, de la panne en Espagne, du compteur Linky, de l'IA et de sa consommation d'énergie, et des SAF, ces carburants d'aviation qui permettent de voler à neutralité carbone dès aujourd'hui.Ce qui m'a frappé dans cet échange, c'est la posture. Julien ne survend pas, il ne minimise pas. Il essaie juste de remettre des faits là où il y a trop souvent des fantasmes.CITATIONS MARQUANTES1. "Si on n'a plus d'énergie, on n'a plus de plastique. Et si on n'a plus de plastique, on n'a plus d'hôpitaux." (Julien Villeret, ~0:03:44)2. "Tous les déchets nucléaires produits par le parc français depuis les années 60, c'est en gros deux piscines olympiques en volume." (Julien Villeret, ~0:17:25)3. "Une centrale nucléaire, ça ne peut pas exploser. C'est un fantasme." (Julien Villeret, ~0:36:26)4. "Les plus grandes batteries du monde aujourd'hui, ce sont des barrages." (Julien Villeret, ~0:11:15)5. "On a arrêté de construire des centrales pour des raisons idéologiques. Les gens qui savaient faire sont partis à la retraite." (Julien Villeret, ~0:26:25)IDÉES MARQUANTES1. L'énergie est consubstantielle à la civilisation, pas optionnelle Timestamp : ~0:02:51 L'énergie n'est pas un confort ou un luxe, c'est le socle de tout : la santé, la nourriture, la fabrication industrielle, la vie moderne dans son entier. Le rejet d'une écologie radicale par les populations vient en partie de là : on leur demande de renoncer à quelque chose qui est aussi fondamental que l'air qu'ils respirent. Pourquoi c'est important : tant qu'on ne pose pas ce cadre, on ne peut pas avoir un débat énergétique honnête.2. L'électricité propre ou sale dépend de comment elle est produite, pas de comment elle est consommée Timestamp : ~0:07:00 Une voiture électrique en France est l'une des plus propres au monde. La même voiture en Allemagne fonctionne au charbon. Ce n'est pas l'usage qui définit l'empreinte carbone, c'est la chaîne de production entière. Pourquoi c'est important : ça remet en question beaucoup de discours simplistes sur la mobilité électrique et force à penser en systèmes.3. Les barrages hydrauliques sont les plus grandes batteries du monde Timestamp : ~0:10:18 L'eau stockée dans un barrage, c'est de l'électricité en réserve. On ouvre ou on ferme selon le besoin. C'est une batterie géante, naturelle, disponible immédiatement. La France l'utilise pour réguler son réseau depuis des décennies. Pourquoi c'est important : cette réalité physique remet en question l'idée que le stockage d'électricité est un problème sans solution.4. Les compétences nucléaires se perdent quand on arrête de construire Timestamp : ~0:26:08 La France a arrêté de construire des centrales pour des raisons politiques. Résultat : les ingénieurs et soudeurs spécialisés ont vieilli et pris leur retraite, et les jeunes ne se sont pas formés sur des métiers qu'on disait sans avenir. Aujourd'hui, EDF recrute 10 000 personnes par an pour rattraper le retard. Pourquoi c'est important : les décisions politiques sur l'énergie ont des conséquences industrielles qui prennent des décennies à corriger.5. Penser l'énergie en statique est une erreur de raisonnement Timestamp : ~0:47:53 Il y a 15 ans, on prédisait que les data centers représenteraient 10% de la consommation mondiale d'électricité. Aujourd'hui on est à 2,2%. Pourquoi ? Parce que les technologies deviennent plus efficaces au fur et à mesure. Tirer la droite et extrapoler lineairement est une erreur systématique dans tous les grands débats énergétiques. Pourquoi c'est important : c'est le même réflexe qu'on applique aujourd'hui à l'IA, et probablement avec les mêmes erreurs de projection.6. La fusion nucléaire : entre le Graal et la promesse impossible Timestamp : ~1:01:58 La fusion produirait une énergie presque illimitée, décarbonée, peu coûteuse et quasi sans déchets. C'est la centrale nucléaire idéale sur le papier. Sauf qu'on ne sait pas encore si on arrivera à la construire, et que les horizons varient de 2035 (optimistes) à 2070 (scientifiques). Les premières centrales en production : probablement 2080-2100. Pourquoi c'est important : ça relativise les discours apocalyptiques sur l'énergie et rappelle qu'on a des décennies pour construire, pas juste quelques années.7. L'hydrogène vert : trop cher, trop dangereux pour la mobilité légère Timestamp : ~1:07:41 EDF ne croit pas à l'hydrogène pour les voitures particulières. Trop cher à produire, trop dangereux à stocker sous pression, infrastructure à construire from scratch. En revanche, pour les bus et les camions approvisionnés depuis une station centralisée, ça peut faire du sens. Les avions, eux, se tournent vers les SAF (Sustainable Aviation Fuels), qui sont opérationnels dès aujourd'hui. Pourquoi c'est important : l'hydrogène est massivement sur-promu dans le débat public, et la réalité industrielle est beaucoup plus about de niche use cases que de révolution générale. QUESTIONS POSÉES DANS L'INTERVIEWQu'est-ce que les gens ne comprennent pas sur l'énergie, et ce serait bien qu'ils comprennent ?Est-ce que le rejet de l'écologie radicale vient du fait qu'on demande aux gens d'arrêter quelque chose de consubstantiel à leur vie ?Comment chez EDF observez-vous l'évolution de la consommation d'énergie, notamment la tension entre développement des usages et efficacité énergétique ?Quelle est l'intermittence réelle des éoliennes et des panneaux solaires, en chiffres concrets ?Qu'est-ce que le compteur Linky exactement, et pourquoi a-t-il généré autant de fantasmes ?Où en est-on de l'innovation sur les déchets nucléaires, et peut-on les recycler ?La France a-t-elle perdu des compétences nucléaires en arrêtant de construire ? Lesquelles ?Est-ce que les SMR (Small Modular Reactors) peuvent accélérer le déploiement du nucléaire ?Est-ce que l'IA et la blockchain vont créer une pénurie d'électricité, ou est-ce une projection trop statique ?Pourquoi l'hydrogène ne fonctionnera probablement pas pour la mobilité légère, et où peut-il avoir du sens ?RÉFÉRENCES CITÉESSites / DonnéesOur World in Data (mentionné comme "The World in Data") : site recommandé par Julien pour visualiser l'évolution du bien-être mondial sur 100-300 ans. (~1:16:20)Agence mondiale de l'énergie (AIE) : citée sur les prévisions de consommation électrique liée à l'IA. (~0:49:30)Institutions / OrganismesANDRA (Agence nationale pour la gestion des déchets radioactifs) : gestion des déchets nucléaires en France. (~0:17:25)Autorité de Sûreté Nucléaire (ASN) : régulation et surveillance du parc nucléaire français. (~0:17:25)ITER : projet international de fusion nucléaire basé en France. (~1:03:30)Enedis : opérateur du réseau de distribution électrique, gestionnaire du compteur Linky (distinct d'EDF). (~0:14:44)RTE : réseau de transport d'électricité française. (~0:44:12)ANSI / ANSSI : agence nationale de sécurité des systèmes d'information, mentionnée pour la cybersécurité des infrastructures. (~0:46:45)Projets / TechnologiesCIGEO : projet d'enfouissement des déchets nucléaires dans des couches géologiques profondes, mené par l'ANDRA. (~0:18:30)Flamanville 3 : prochain réacteur nucléaire français, sur le point d'être raccordé au réseau. (~0:21:03)Hinkley Point C : réacteur en construction au Royaume-Uni par EDF. (~0:28:18)Sizewell : projet de réacteur au Royaume-Uni. (~0:28:18)New World (projet EDF) : SMR développé par EDF. (~0:42:17)SAF / e-fuel (Sustainable Aviation Fuels) : carburant d'aviation bas carbone, obligation réglementaire croissante en Europe. (~1:12:32)ÉvénementsAccident de Fukushima : analysé en détail comme tsunami avant d'être un accident nucléaire, utilisé comme base d'apprentissage mondial. (~0:19:00)Panne électrique en Espagne et Portugal : analysée comme "orage parfait" lié à la nature analogique de l'électricité. (~0:51:33)Record d'exportation d'électricité EDF : 90 TWh exportés, record historique. (~0:48:11)Découverte scientifiqueHydrogène blanc : gisement potentiellement record découvert en France, hydrogène naturel présent dans le sol. (~1:06:40)TIMESTAMPS CLÉS (YouTube)00:00 Introduction : et si on se réjouissait à nouveau du futur ? 01:55 Présentation de Julien Villeret, directeur de l'innovation EDF02:05 L'énergie, c'est quoi au fond ? Ce que les gens ne comprennent pas L'énergie est consubstantielle à la civilisation depuis toujours. Sans électricité aujourd'hui, on perd tout : la santé, la nourriture, la fabrication industrielle. C'est le cadre que pose Julien avant d'aborder quoi que ce soit.04:18 Pourquoi l'écologie radicale ne passe pas dans l'opinion publique Le rejet du discours radical vient d'une réalité simple : on ne peut pas demander aux gens d'arrêter quelque chose d'aussi fondamental que l'énergie. La vraie question n'est pas d'arrêter, c'est comment produire et consommer différemment.06:29 Le pic du charbon et la réalité du mix énergétique mondial On continue de brûler beaucoup de charbon pour produire de l'électricité, notamment en Allemagne et en Pologne. Ce qui explique directement le sujet suivant.06:51 Voiture électrique en Allemagne = voiture au charbon ? Si l'électricité est produite au charbon, une voiture électrique n'est pas vertueuse. La chaîne complète de production compte, pas seulement le mode de transport. La France à 98% sans CO2 est une exception mondiale.08:37 Peut-on imaginer 100% d'énergie renouvelable ? Techniquement oui, économiquement non. Le problème de l'intermittence (les renouvelables produisent environ 25-30% du temps) et du coût du stockage rendrait la facture 10 à 20 fois plus élevée qu'aujourd'hui.10:18 Les barrages : les plus grandes batteries du monde L'eau stockée dans un barrage, c'est de l'électricité en réserve. Un lac, c'est une batterie géante naturelle. Les barrages hydroélectriques sont aussi des outils de régulation du réseau, activés ou coupés selon les besoins du moment.13:30 L'intermittence des renouvelables en chiffres concrets Éoliennes et panneaux solaires produisent à pleine puissance environ 25 à 30% du temps. Le pic de production solaire est autour de midi, soit rarement au moment des pics de consommation (matin, soir).14:34 Le compteur Linky : derrière les fantasmes, la réalité Linky ne surveille personne. Il envoie l'index de consommation une fois par jour, pendant 10 secondes, via les fils électriques, sans aucune émission d'ondes. Le détail au quart d'heure est opt-in. Ce sont surtout des fraudeurs que Linky a gênés.17:05 Les déchets nucléaires : vraiment deux piscines olympiques depuis les années 60 Tout le parc nucléaire français depuis le début des années 60 a produit environ 4 000 m3 de déchets à longue vie, soit deux piscines olympiques. Ils sont stockés à La Hague dans de l'eau (meilleur protecteur contre les radiations), avec un projet d'enfouissement géologique profond (CIGEO).21:47 Peut-on recycler les déchets nucléaires ? Oui, une partie du combustible usé est retraitée et réinjectée dans les centrales. Des recherches sont en cours pour fermer complètement le cycle : des réacteurs qui réutilisent en permanence le même combustible sans presque générer de déchets. Horizon : 2050-2070.22:53 Dépendances géopolitiques : uranium, gaz, pétrole, panneaux solaires Le pétrole et le gaz viennent du Moyen-Orient, de Russie et des États-Unis. Les panneaux solaires viennent quasi-exclusivement de Chine. L'uranium, lui, est présent dans de nombreux pays, n'est pas cher, et est stocké sur plusieurs années par sécurité.26:08 Les compétences nucléaires perdues et les 10 000 recrutements par an En arrêtant de construire des centrales pour des raisons politiques, la France a perdu des savoir-faire spécifiques : béton nucléaire, générateurs de vapeur, soudure qualifiée. EDF recrute maintenant 10 000 personnes par an pour reconstruire ces compétences. Un soudeur nucléaire gagne entre 3 000 et 4 000 euros par mois.32:04 Où seront construits les 6 nouveaux réacteurs français ? Sur les terrains déjà acquis à côté des centrales existantes (ex : Penly). Les riverains d'une centrale sont généralement très favorables : emplois, taxes locales, vie locale développée. Une centrale qui ne tourne pas, c'est un million d'euros de pertes par jour.36:21 Une centrale peut-elle exploser ? Les accidents nucléaires démystifiés Non, les centrales françaises ne peuvent pas exploser. Fukushima était d'abord un tsunami, pas un accident nucléaire au sens strict. Depuis, toutes les centrales françaises ont été équipées de générateurs diesel en hauteur et de récupérateurs (les "cendriers") pour le cas où le coeur fondrait.41:42 Les SMR (Small Modular Reactors) : l'avenir du nucléaire ou juste une promesse ? Aucun SMR n'est encore construit à ce jour. L'idée : des petits réacteurs plus rapides à déployer, moins coûteux, qui peuvent remplacer une centrale charbon en plug and play. Les Américains y croient surtout pour décarboner leur vieux parc charbon.45:13 Cybersécurité des centrales : isolées d'internet par principe physique Les systèmes qui font fonctionner les centrales nucléaires ne sont pas connectés à internet. C'est une barrière physique, pas logicielle. EDF mobilise plusieurs centaines de personnes à temps plein sur la cybersécurité.46:45 IA et consommation d'énergie : une vraie menace ou un raisonnement trop statique ? Il y a 15 ans, on prédisait que les data centers allaient représenter 10% de la consommation mondiale d'électricité. On en est à 2,2%. Les projections en ligne droite tombent toujours à côté parce qu'elles ignorent les gains d'efficacité technologique. En France, la marge est très large : EDF a exporté un record historique de 90 TWh l'année dernière.51:33 La panne en Espagne-Portugal : l'analogique contre le numérique L'électricité est analogique : production doit en permanence égaler consommation. Un écart provoque l'effondrement. En Espagne, une suite de problèmes improbables arrivés en même temps (un "orage parfait") a déstabilisé le réseau. La France s'est déconnectée pour éviter d'être entraînée dans la chute.56:41 Géothermie : pourquoi elle n'a pas décollé en France La géothermie dépend des choix de subvention publique. L'Allemagne l'a financée, la France non. En France, l'électricité est peu chère et faiblement carbonée, donc l'incentive est quasi nul. Installer de la géothermie en retrofit exige de tout creuser. La géothermie profonde pose en plus des risques sismiques.1:01:58 Fusion nucléaire : le Graal énergétique, entre 2035 et 2070 La fusion produirait une énergie quasi-illimitée, décarbonée, peu coûteuse et presque sans déchets. Les scientifiques parlent de premiers prototypes vers 2060-2070, les start-ups d'une dizaine d'années plus tôt. On a récemment réussi pour la première fois à produire plus d'énergie qu'on n'en consomme dans une réaction de fusion. Même si ça arrive, les premières centrales en production seront probablement vers 2080-2100.1:06:40 Hydrogène : blanc, vert, gris. Ce que chacun veut dire vraiment L'hydrogène gris (produit industriellement) est très polluant. Le vert (via électrolyse) est très cher. Le blanc (naturel, dans le sol) est encore expérimental. EDF ne croit pas à l'hydrogène pour les voitures particulières : trop dangereux, trop cher, réseau à construire from scratch. Pour les bus et camions sur station centralisée, ça peut avoir du sens.1:11:23 Aviation à hydrogène et SAF : ce qu'on peut espérer vraiment Airbus a repoussé son projet d'avion hydrogène à 2050. L'aviation mise aujourd'hui sur les SAF (Sustainable Aviation Fuels) : des carburants produits à partir de CO2 capté dans l'air, déjà présents dans les réservoirs des avions Air France. C'est l'horizon réaliste, avant peut-être un avion électrique pour les courtes distances (Paris-Berlin, lignes régionales), d'ici 2030.1:15:50 Pourquoi il y a quand même des raisons d'espérer Julien conclut sur une conviction : en regardant sur le temps long, le monde va mieux. The World in Data le montre sur 200 ans. Dans l'énergie, on est passé des voitures à particules des années 50 à l'électricité bas carbone d'aujourd'hui, en 60-70 ans. Et on surestime toujours les transformations à court terme tout en les sous-estimant à long terme.1:19:44 Clap de fin : ouvrir la porte à la nuance Suggestion d'autres épisodes à écouter : #391 L'indépendance énergétique est-elle sous nos pieds? Avec Pierre Brossolet (https://audmns.com/fcRUEpN) #187 Energy Observer: envisager le futur de l'énergie avec Louis Noel Viviès (https://audmns.com/vJdRdXI) Vlan #131 Transition énergétique: ce qu'un adulte devrait savoir avec Matthieu Auzanneau (https://audmns.com/SPHszOf)Hébergé par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

Julien Villeret dirige l'innovation du groupe EDF, on s'est retrouvés un jour de pluie, ce qui tombait plutôt bien pour parler d'énergie. Julien est l'un de ces rares interlocuteurs capables de parler du mix énergétique français sans perdre la nuance ni tomber dans le discours institutionnel. Il connaît le sujet de l'intérieur, et il n'a pas peur d'aller là où ça grince.Dans cet épisode, nous parlons de nucléaire, bien sûr, mais aussi de ce qu'on ne comprend pas sur l'électricité en général. J'ai questionné Julien sur les déchets nucléaires (leur volume réel vous va surprendre), sur les compétences qu'on a perdues en arrêtant de construire des centrales, sur pourquoi une voiture électrique en Allemagne, c'est techniquement une voiture au charbon, et sur l'hydrogène, qu'on nous vend comme la grande révolution alors que la réalité est beaucoup plus complexe.On parle aussi de fusion nucléaire, de SMR, de la panne en Espagne, du compteur Linky, de l'IA et de sa consommation d'énergie, et des SAF, ces carburants d'aviation qui permettent de voler à neutralité carbone dès aujourd'hui.Ce qui m'a frappé dans cet échange, c'est la posture. Julien ne survend pas, il ne minimise pas. Il essaie juste de remettre des faits là où il y a trop souvent des fantasmes.CITATIONS MARQUANTES1. "Si on n'a plus d'énergie, on n'a plus de plastique. Et si on n'a plus de plastique, on n'a plus d'hôpitaux." (Julien Villeret, ~0:03:44)2. "Tous les déchets nucléaires produits par le parc français depuis les années 60, c'est en gros deux piscines olympiques en volume." (Julien Villeret, ~0:17:25)3. "Une centrale nucléaire, ça ne peut pas exploser. C'est un fantasme." (Julien Villeret, ~0:36:26)4. "Les plus grandes batteries du monde aujourd'hui, ce sont des barrages." (Julien Villeret, ~0:11:15)5. "On a arrêté de construire des centrales pour des raisons idéologiques. Les gens qui savaient faire sont partis à la retraite." (Julien Villeret, ~0:26:25)IDÉES MARQUANTES1. L'énergie est consubstantielle à la civilisation, pas optionnelle Timestamp : ~0:02:51 L'énergie n'est pas un confort ou un luxe, c'est le socle de tout : la santé, la nourriture, la fabrication industrielle, la vie moderne dans son entier. Le rejet d'une écologie radicale par les populations vient en partie de là : on leur demande de renoncer à quelque chose qui est aussi fondamental que l'air qu'ils respirent. Pourquoi c'est important : tant qu'on ne pose pas ce cadre, on ne peut pas avoir un débat énergétique honnête.2. L'électricité propre ou sale dépend de comment elle est produite, pas de comment elle est consommée Timestamp : ~0:07:00 Une voiture électrique en France est l'une des plus propres au monde. La même voiture en Allemagne fonctionne au charbon. Ce n'est pas l'usage qui définit l'empreinte carbone, c'est la chaîne de production entière. Pourquoi c'est important : ça remet en question beaucoup de discours simplistes sur la mobilité électrique et force à penser en systèmes.3. Les barrages hydrauliques sont les plus grandes batteries du monde Timestamp : ~0:10:18 L'eau stockée dans un barrage, c'est de l'électricité en réserve. On ouvre ou on ferme selon le besoin. C'est une batterie géante, naturelle, disponible immédiatement. La France l'utilise pour réguler son réseau depuis des décennies. Pourquoi c'est important : cette réalité physique remet en question l'idée que le stockage d'électricité est un problème sans solution.4. Les compétences nucléaires se perdent quand on arrête de construire Timestamp : ~0:26:08 La France a arrêté de construire des centrales pour des raisons politiques. Résultat : les ingénieurs et soudeurs spécialisés ont vieilli et pris leur retraite, et les jeunes ne se sont pas formés sur des métiers qu'on disait sans avenir. Aujourd'hui, EDF recrute 10 000 personnes par an pour rattraper le retard. Pourquoi c'est important : les décisions politiques sur l'énergie ont des conséquences industrielles qui prennent des décennies à corriger.5. Penser l'énergie en statique est une erreur de raisonnement Timestamp : ~0:47:53 Il y a 15 ans, on prédisait que les data centers représenteraient 10% de la consommation mondiale d'électricité. Aujourd'hui on est à 2,2%. Pourquoi ? Parce que les technologies deviennent plus efficaces au fur et à mesure. Tirer la droite et extrapoler lineairement est une erreur systématique dans tous les grands débats énergétiques. Pourquoi c'est important : c'est le même réflexe qu'on applique aujourd'hui à l'IA, et probablement avec les mêmes erreurs de projection.6. La fusion nucléaire : entre le Graal et la promesse impossible Timestamp : ~1:01:58 La fusion produirait une énergie presque illimitée, décarbonée, peu coûteuse et quasi sans déchets. C'est la centrale nucléaire idéale sur le papier. Sauf qu'on ne sait pas encore si on arrivera à la construire, et que les horizons varient de 2035 (optimistes) à 2070 (scientifiques). Les premières centrales en production : probablement 2080-2100. Pourquoi c'est important : ça relativise les discours apocalyptiques sur l'énergie et rappelle qu'on a des décennies pour construire, pas juste quelques années.7. L'hydrogène vert : trop cher, trop dangereux pour la mobilité légère Timestamp : ~1:07:41 EDF ne croit pas à l'hydrogène pour les voitures particulières. Trop cher à produire, trop dangereux à stocker sous pression, infrastructure à construire from scratch. En revanche, pour les bus et les camions approvisionnés depuis une station centralisée, ça peut faire du sens. Les avions, eux, se tournent vers les SAF (Sustainable Aviation Fuels), qui sont opérationnels dès aujourd'hui. Pourquoi c'est important : l'hydrogène est massivement sur-promu dans le débat public, et la réalité industrielle est beaucoup plus about de niche use cases que de révolution générale. QUESTIONS POSÉES DANS L'INTERVIEWQu'est-ce que les gens ne comprennent pas sur l'énergie, et ce serait bien qu'ils comprennent ?Est-ce que le rejet de l'écologie radicale vient du fait qu'on demande aux gens d'arrêter quelque chose de consubstantiel à leur vie ?Comment chez EDF observez-vous l'évolution de la consommation d'énergie, notamment la tension entre développement des usages et efficacité énergétique ?Quelle est l'intermittence réelle des éoliennes et des panneaux solaires, en chiffres concrets ?Qu'est-ce que le compteur Linky exactement, et pourquoi a-t-il généré autant de fantasmes ?Où en est-on de l'innovation sur les déchets nucléaires, et peut-on les recycler ?La France a-t-elle perdu des compétences nucléaires en arrêtant de construire ? Lesquelles ?Est-ce que les SMR (Small Modular Reactors) peuvent accélérer le déploiement du nucléaire ?Est-ce que l'IA et la blockchain vont créer une pénurie d'électricité, ou est-ce une projection trop statique ?Pourquoi l'hydrogène ne fonctionnera probablement pas pour la mobilité légère, et où peut-il avoir du sens ?RÉFÉRENCES CITÉESSites / DonnéesOur World in Data (mentionné comme "The World in Data") : site recommandé par Julien pour visualiser l'évolution du bien-être mondial sur 100-300 ans. (~1:16:20)Agence mondiale de l'énergie (AIE) : citée sur les prévisions de consommation électrique liée à l'IA. (~0:49:30)Institutions / OrganismesANDRA (Agence nationale pour la gestion des déchets radioactifs) : gestion des déchets nucléaires en France. (~0:17:25)Autorité de Sûreté Nucléaire (ASN) : régulation et surveillance du parc nucléaire français. (~0:17:25)ITER : projet international de fusion nucléaire basé en France. (~1:03:30)Enedis : opérateur du réseau de distribution électrique, gestionnaire du compteur Linky (distinct d'EDF). (~0:14:44)RTE : réseau de transport d'électricité française. (~0:44:12)ANSI / ANSSI : agence nationale de sécurité des systèmes d'information, mentionnée pour la cybersécurité des infrastructures. (~0:46:45)Projets / TechnologiesCIGEO : projet d'enfouissement des déchets nucléaires dans des couches géologiques profondes, mené par l'ANDRA. (~0:18:30)Flamanville 3 : prochain réacteur nucléaire français, sur le point d'être raccordé au réseau. (~0:21:03)Hinkley Point C : réacteur en construction au Royaume-Uni par EDF. (~0:28:18)Sizewell : projet de réacteur au Royaume-Uni. (~0:28:18)New World (projet EDF) : SMR développé par EDF. (~0:42:17)SAF / e-fuel (Sustainable Aviation Fuels) : carburant d'aviation bas carbone, obligation réglementaire croissante en Europe. (~1:12:32)ÉvénementsAccident de Fukushima : analysé en détail comme tsunami avant d'être un accident nucléaire, utilisé comme base d'apprentissage mondial. (~0:19:00)Panne électrique en Espagne et Portugal : analysée comme "orage parfait" lié à la nature analogique de l'électricité. (~0:51:33)Record d'exportation d'électricité EDF : 90 TWh exportés, record historique. (~0:48:11)Découverte scientifiqueHydrogène blanc : gisement potentiellement record découvert en France, hydrogène naturel présent dans le sol. (~1:06:40)TIMESTAMPS CLÉS (YouTube)00:00 Introduction : et si on se réjouissait à nouveau du futur ? 01:55 Présentation de Julien Villeret, directeur de l'innovation EDF02:05 L'énergie, c'est quoi au fond ? Ce que les gens ne comprennent pas L'énergie est consubstantielle à la civilisation depuis toujours. Sans électricité aujourd'hui, on perd tout : la santé, la nourriture, la fabrication industrielle. C'est le cadre que pose Julien avant d'aborder quoi que ce soit.04:18 Pourquoi l'écologie radicale ne passe pas dans l'opinion publique Le rejet du discours radical vient d'une réalité simple : on ne peut pas demander aux gens d'arrêter quelque chose d'aussi fondamental que l'énergie. La vraie question n'est pas d'arrêter, c'est comment produire et consommer différemment.06:29 Le pic du charbon et la réalité du mix énergétique mondial On continue de brûler beaucoup de charbon pour produire de l'électricité, notamment en Allemagne et en Pologne. Ce qui explique directement le sujet suivant.06:51 Voiture électrique en Allemagne = voiture au charbon ? Si l'électricité est produite au charbon, une voiture électrique n'est pas vertueuse. La chaîne complète de production compte, pas seulement le mode de transport. La France à 98% sans CO2 est une exception mondiale.08:37 Peut-on imaginer 100% d'énergie renouvelable ? Techniquement oui, économiquement non. Le problème de l'intermittence (les renouvelables produisent environ 25-30% du temps) et du coût du stockage rendrait la facture 10 à 20 fois plus élevée qu'aujourd'hui.10:18 Les barrages : les plus grandes batteries du monde L'eau stockée dans un barrage, c'est de l'électricité en réserve. Un lac, c'est une batterie géante naturelle. Les barrages hydroélectriques sont aussi des outils de régulation du réseau, activés ou coupés selon les besoins du moment.13:30 L'intermittence des renouvelables en chiffres concrets Éoliennes et panneaux solaires produisent à pleine puissance environ 25 à 30% du temps. Le pic de production solaire est autour de midi, soit rarement au moment des pics de consommation (matin, soir).14:34 Le compteur Linky : derrière les fantasmes, la réalité Linky ne surveille personne. Il envoie l'index de consommation une fois par jour, pendant 10 secondes, via les fils électriques, sans aucune émission d'ondes. Le détail au quart d'heure est opt-in. Ce sont surtout des fraudeurs que Linky a gênés.17:05 Les déchets nucléaires : vraiment deux piscines olympiques depuis les années 60 Tout le parc nucléaire français depuis le début des années 60 a produit environ 4 000 m3 de déchets à longue vie, soit deux piscines olympiques. Ils sont stockés à La Hague dans de l'eau (meilleur protecteur contre les radiations), avec un projet d'enfouissement géologique profond (CIGEO).21:47 Peut-on recycler les déchets nucléaires ? Oui, une partie du combustible usé est retraitée et réinjectée dans les centrales. Des recherches sont en cours pour fermer complètement le cycle : des réacteurs qui réutilisent en permanence le même combustible sans presque générer de déchets. Horizon : 2050-2070.22:53 Dépendances géopolitiques : uranium, gaz, pétrole, panneaux solaires Le pétrole et le gaz viennent du Moyen-Orient, de Russie et des États-Unis. Les panneaux solaires viennent quasi-exclusivement de Chine. L'uranium, lui, est présent dans de nombreux pays, n'est pas cher, et est stocké sur plusieurs années par sécurité.26:08 Les compétences nucléaires perdues et les 10 000 recrutements par an En arrêtant de construire des centrales pour des raisons politiques, la France a perdu des savoir-faire spécifiques : béton nucléaire, générateurs de vapeur, soudure qualifiée. EDF recrute maintenant 10 000 personnes par an pour reconstruire ces compétences. Un soudeur nucléaire gagne entre 3 000 et 4 000 euros par mois.32:04 Où seront construits les 6 nouveaux réacteurs français ? Sur les terrains déjà acquis à côté des centrales existantes (ex : Penly). Les riverains d'une centrale sont généralement très favorables : emplois, taxes locales, vie locale développée. Une centrale qui ne tourne pas, c'est un million d'euros de pertes par jour.36:21 Une centrale peut-elle exploser ? Les accidents nucléaires démystifiés Non, les centrales françaises ne peuvent pas exploser. Fukushima était d'abord un tsunami, pas un accident nucléaire au sens strict. Depuis, toutes les centrales françaises ont été équipées de générateurs diesel en hauteur et de récupérateurs (les "cendriers") pour le cas où le coeur fondrait.41:42 Les SMR (Small Modular Reactors) : l'avenir du nucléaire ou juste une promesse ? Aucun SMR n'est encore construit à ce jour. L'idée : des petits réacteurs plus rapides à déployer, moins coûteux, qui peuvent remplacer une centrale charbon en plug and play. Les Américains y croient surtout pour décarboner leur vieux parc charbon.45:13 Cybersécurité des centrales : isolées d'internet par principe physique Les systèmes qui font fonctionner les centrales nucléaires ne sont pas connectés à internet. C'est une barrière physique, pas logicielle. EDF mobilise plusieurs centaines de personnes à temps plein sur la cybersécurité.46:45 IA et consommation d'énergie : une vraie menace ou un raisonnement trop statique ? Il y a 15 ans, on prédisait que les data centers allaient représenter 10% de la consommation mondiale d'électricité. On en est à 2,2%. Les projections en ligne droite tombent toujours à côté parce qu'elles ignorent les gains d'efficacité technologique. En France, la marge est très large : EDF a exporté un record historique de 90 TWh l'année dernière.51:33 La panne en Espagne-Portugal : l'analogique contre le numérique L'électricité est analogique : production doit en permanence égaler consommation. Un écart provoque l'effondrement. En Espagne, une suite de problèmes improbables arrivés en même temps (un "orage parfait") a déstabilisé le réseau. La France s'est déconnectée pour éviter d'être entraînée dans la chute.56:41 Géothermie : pourquoi elle n'a pas décollé en France La géothermie dépend des choix de subvention publique. L'Allemagne l'a financée, la France non. En France, l'électricité est peu chère et faiblement carbonée, donc l'incentive est quasi nul. Installer de la géothermie en retrofit exige de tout creuser. La géothermie profonde pose en plus des risques sismiques.1:01:58 Fusion nucléaire : le Graal énergétique, entre 2035 et 2070 La fusion produirait une énergie quasi-illimitée, décarbonée, peu coûteuse et presque sans déchets. Les scientifiques parlent de premiers prototypes vers 2060-2070, les start-ups d'une dizaine d'années plus tôt. On a récemment réussi pour la première fois à produire plus d'énergie qu'on n'en consomme dans une réaction de fusion. Même si ça arrive, les premières centrales en production seront probablement vers 2080-2100.1:06:40 Hydrogène : blanc, vert, gris. Ce que chacun veut dire vraiment L'hydrogène gris (produit industriellement) est très polluant. Le vert (via électrolyse) est très cher. Le blanc (naturel, dans le sol) est encore expérimental. EDF ne croit pas à l'hydrogène pour les voitures particulières : trop dangereux, trop cher, réseau à construire from scratch. Pour les bus et camions sur station centralisée, ça peut avoir du sens.1:11:23 Aviation à hydrogène et SAF : ce qu'on peut espérer vraiment Airbus a repoussé son projet d'avion hydrogène à 2050. L'aviation mise aujourd'hui sur les SAF (Sustainable Aviation Fuels) : des carburants produits à partir de CO2 capté dans l'air, déjà présents dans les réservoirs des avions Air France. C'est l'horizon réaliste, avant peut-être un avion électrique pour les courtes distances (Paris-Berlin, lignes régionales), d'ici 2030.1:15:50 Pourquoi il y a quand même des raisons d'espérer Julien conclut sur une conviction : en regardant sur le temps long, le monde va mieux. The World in Data le montre sur 200 ans. Dans l'énergie, on est passé des voitures à particules des années 50 à l'électricité bas carbone d'aujourd'hui, en 60-70 ans. Et on surestime toujours les transformations à court terme tout en les sous-estimant à long terme.1:19:44 Clap de fin : ouvrir la porte à la nuanceHébergé par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

Grant Isaac, President and COO of Cameco, joins Decouple to explain why uranium behaves unlike any other commodity. With essentially zero fundamental in-year demand, a spot market that reports prices rather than discovering them, and a long-term contracting structure that ties producers directly to the utilities using the fuel, uranium operates by rules that confound anyone who approaches it through the lens of oil, gas, or base metals. Grant walks through Cameco's history as an integrated nuclear fuel company spanning mining, milling, conversion, and now fuel fabrication and reactor services through its Westinghouse partnership, explaining why that vertical integration reflects genuine customer intimacy rather than financial engineering.The conversation covers the full sweep of uranium market cycles from the post-Atoms for Peace inventory buildup through the post-Fukushima bear market, Cameco's decision to curtail 70% of its production rather than sell into a floor, and what is structurally different about the current cycle. The historic secondary supply buffer that held prices down for 30 years is gone, Kazakhstan has learned the lesson that producing more into a weak market destroys national asset value, and geopolitical fragmentation is bifurcating what was once a seamlessly globalized commodity into distinct western and non-western supply chains. Grant argues that the long-term price signal, steady rather than saw-toothing, reflects a more durable demand base than any previous cycle.Listen to Decouple on:• Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/6PNr3ml8nEQotWWavE9kQz• Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/decouple/id1516526694?uo=4• Overcast: https://overcast.fm/itunes1516526694/decouple• Pocket Casts: https://pca.st/ehbfrn44• RSS: https://anchor.fm/s/23775178/podcast/rssWebsite: https://www.decouple.media

On April 14, President Trump signed an executive order telling the Department of War and NASA to put a nuclear power plant in low Earth orbit by 2028 and one on the lunar surface by 2030. Lt Gen (Ret.) Steven L. Kwast unpacks why that is not the start of weaponized space, but the catch up move America cannot afford to skip. Kwast walks through the case calmly and clearly. We already have a nuclear navy steaming the oceans safely for decades, so why not a nuclear powered space force? He tackles the Fukushima fear directly, explains how Elon Musk style cheap launch lets us send spent uranium rods into the sun, and shows how robotic mechanics, AI, and laser comms make astronauts unnecessary for reactor operations. Then he zooms out. China and Russia are already racing for space nuclear power. Whoever gets there first gets the high ground of energy, communications, and resources. Distributed mobile reactors in orbit work like the internet or a blockchain ledger, every node has to be killed to kill the network. The homework: read up, vote smart, and stop letting lobbyists scare your members of Congress into standing still.

This show has been flagged as Clean by the host. -------------------- 01 Introduction This is a follow up to my 8 part series on nuclear power. In this episode I will answer questions posed by listeners in the comments to the series. I would like to start by thanking these people for taking the time to submit interesting questions. -------------------- Costs of Small Versus Large Reactors 02 brian-in-ohio asked two questions The first was for a cost comparison between large and small reactors. The second was for nuclear plant safety compared to conventional power plants. 03 Answer I think that any answer to the second question is going to be perceived by some people as politically controversial, so it's probably not a good topic for HPR to address. 04 The first question though about cost of small versus large reactors is an interesting one, although not one that is easy to give an answer to. I will restrict the answer to just grid scale electric power production and ignore use cases such as industrial process heat or power for remote mines and communities. 05 This question comes down to economies of scale versus economies of replication. Economies of scale centre around increased efficiencies of use of materials and labour when making something bigger. For example, the amount of steel used by a pipe increases linearly with its diameter, but the amount of fluid that it transports increases with the square. 06 Economies of replication come from increasing efficiencies which result from serial production. As you repeat the same design over and over again, you learn how to do things better and make fewer mistakes. 07 The exact same principles apply to shipbuilding. Indeed, a lot of the inspiration for Small Modular Reactors comes from the shipbuilding industry. If you build a series of identical ships, then each subsequent ship will cost less and be built faster. There are of course diminishing returns to this process, so the improvements are less with each additional unit and after a sufficient number of units the cost and time reductions level off. 08 However, this doesn't discount the benefits of economies of scale. What it does mean is that there are two ways of approaching the problem, and which way works in any given scenario depends on such conditions as how big the local electricity market is how fast the demand for electricity is growing, the ownership and financing structure of the electricity market, and the geography of the area, which may pose limits on the number of sites. 09 According to the finance people who have crunched the numbers, there are two sizes of reactor which make the most sense in the above context. These are 300 MW and 1000 MW. However, take those as very rough numbers rather than immutable laws of nature and other sizes may work as well. 10 The key point is that there are cases to be made for both small and large reactors, with the large reactor being several times the size of the small one. 11 An additional factor is that building only one reactor does not reap the benefits of efficiency of replication. You need to build a series of them on the same site. So if you are building a power plant, you don't build a power plant that has just one reactor unless you are in a small market which can only use that much power. Instead, you should build between 4 and 6 reactors in sequence next to one another. 12 If you are supply a large population with a growing demand for electricity, then 4 or 6 large 1000 MW reactors gains both economies of scale and economies of replication. If you are supplying a smaller population with slow growth in demand for electricity, then 4 or 6 300 MW reactors at least gets you economies of replication. 13 There is what could be viewed as an interesting example in terms of the above taking place just east of Toronto. There they are building four 300 MW SMRs on a site next to an existing nuclear power plant. 14 Here are the cost estimates from the Government of Ontario. All costs are in Canadian dollars. Unit 1 is $6.1 billion, plus $1.6 billion in costs which are shared by all four unit.s Unit 2 is $4.9 billion. Unit 3 is $4.2 billion. Unit 4 is $4.1 billion. 15 As you can see, building a series of reactors sequentially on the same site results in declining overall costs. They are very confident in these costs as they used data from a series of major nuclear power plant refurbishment projects in Ontario which have been coming in on time and on budget. 16 Construction began last year and the plant is expected to have a 65 year operating life. 17 However, the province of Ontario also has plans for expansion of electrical generation by about 15,000 MW by 2050 in order to meet net zero targets. 18 Given the heavy concentration of population in the Toronto region, and the very high cost and difficulty of building long distance transmission lines, and the limited number of sites which could host new power generation facilities of any sort, I suspect it is quite likely that subsequent reactors will be large 1,000 MW ones rather than SMRs. 19 The Wesleyville site (which is further east of Toronto) is tentatively scheduled for a 10,000 MW nuclear power plant. That would seem to make ten 1,000 MW reactors more likely than 34 300 MW reactors. 20 I don't have a comparable set of numbers for building large reactors to give an exact apples to apples comparison of costs. Different countries use different accounting and financing systems, and finance makes a huge difference to overall costs for nuclear power as operating costs are a relatively small share of the total. 21 Now to look at another side of this equation, the provinces of Saskatchewan and New Brunswick wish to replace their coal fired power plants with nuclear power plants. The populations of these provinces are too small to absorb a large new power plant into their grids, and studies assuming large reactors have foundered on this issue. 22 New Brunswick already have a nuclear power plant, but it was build in the days when reactors were much smaller. Both provinces however are very interested in small reactors, even individual ones, in order to replace the coal fired plants that are of similar size. 23 I think this covers the cost versus size issue. The more I look into it, the more it becomes apparent that there is no simple one size fits all answer but rather there are a series of trade-offs which must be taken in light of local circumstances. -------------------- MOX Fuel in the USA 24 The next question comes from mnw who asked about the use of MOX fuel in the USA. 25 mnw asked I am enjoying and look forward to the rest of the series. Do you think the US will ever wake up and start recycling its spent fuel? It seems like such a huge waste just to try and keep a small amount of fuel away from"the bad guys" or whatever they are imagining. Answer 26 My answer to this is as follows. I think I've addressed this in the original series, although not directly with respect to the US so I can provide some more detail on that aspect of it. 27 First though I will review what plutonium-uranium mixed oxide (MOX) fuel is. As mentioned in previous episodes, military grade plutonium is not the same as the plutonium which comes out of commercial power reactors. Just as military grade uranium requires nearly pure U-235 isotope, military grade plutonium requires nearly pure Pu-239 isotope. 28 What comes out of a commercial power reactor as spent fuel is not usable for weapons purposes as the proportion of Pu-239 is much too low. However, plutonium recovered from spent fuel can be used as fuel for nuclear reactors in place of uranium 235 when mixed with uranium 238 either left over from enrichment or extracted from spent fuel. This is what is known as MOX fuel. 29 To look at the US history of this however, here's the sequence of events. The US banned fuel reprocessing in 1976. However, this ban was repealed in 1981. 30 In 2005, the US began building a mixed-oxide (MOX) fuel plant at Savannah River in the state of South Carolina. However, this plant was not intended as a normal commercial operation and it was not intended to recycle commercial nuclear power plant fuel. It was instead intended to convert surplus military grade plutonium into commercial fuel in order to get rid of it as part of an arms control program. 31 The program was suspended in 2018. There were apparently many complex political issues involved in these on-again off-again decisions and I won't pretend to have the time or interest to explore all the details nor do I think most listeners would be interested in hearing abou them. 32 As of March 2026, the US are looking at reviving part of the Savannah River plant to produce limited amounts of fuel for testing of advanced reactors. The issue driving this is the shortage of uranium enriched to just below 20%. This fuel is used in certain types of small SMR. 33 The main commercial supplier of this material was a plant in Russia, but "certain events in Europe in recent years" shall we say, have resulted in that supply no longer being available to commercial operations in the US. MOX fuel based on surplus weapons grade plutonium is intended as a short term quick fix for that problem. 34 Another driving force is legal requirements following from domestic commitments for the US government to dispose of certain stockpiles of weapons grade plutonium from certain sites in the US where it is "temporarily" stored, and the solution to that is seen as burning it up in power reactors. 35 So the history is the US banned fuel reprocessing. Then a few years later they un-banned it. Then the US government started building a MOX plant which was intended to get rid of surplus weapons grade material by burning it up in power reactors. Then they decided they didn't want to do that. Then they decided they may want to make MOX fuel after all to replace supplies of special grades of fuel for experimental or prototype reactors. 36 What is missing from the above history is any actual interest from the US commercial nuclear industry in MOX fuel. The reason for this is, as mentioned in the previous episodes, uranium is so cheap and abundant that fuel made from fresh uranium is cheaper than MOX fuel. 37 Some countries such as France wish to recycle spent fuel to reduce their dependence upon imports. Recall that France's drive to build nuclear power plants was in response to the 1970s era energy crisis when oil imports from the Middle East were suddenly cut off. However, the US are not concerned about this issue and so do not make it national security policy as France did. 38 As a result, US commercial demand is for cheaper fuel made from fresh uranium rather than for MOX fuel. Until such time as fresh uranium greatly increases in price there is little economic incentive for the use of MOX fuel in the US. 39 However, there is another aspect to this. If you recall in previous episodes I described molten salt reactors which used dissolved uranium fuel. These reactors inherently reprocess fuel as part of their normal operation. They just do it as part of maintaining the molten salt chemistry at the correct values rather than doing it as a separate process. 40 If these types of reactors become widely used then they would be achieving the same thing as creating MOX fuel, but without an explicit separate step. 41 As a final footnote to the above, the US has almost exclusively use enriched uranium light water reactors. As mentioned in previous episodes, there are ways of recycling spent fuel from light water reactors which do not involve chemically reprocessing it to make MOX fuel. 42 Experiments have been done involving South Korea, China, and Canada which take spent fuel from light water reactors and repackage it to fit it into natural uranium heavy water reactors. What is used up or "spent" fuel for a light water reactor is high grade fuel to a natural uranium reactor. However, the US has, for whatever reason, never built commercial natural uranium reactors such as are used in a number of other countries around the world. 43 If they were to do so, then nuclear fuel could be used twice, once in a light water reactor, and again in a natural uranium reactor, all without having to turn it into MOX fuel in a separate reprocessing step. However, this particular alternative would likely face the same issue in the sense that fresh fuel would still be cheaper than reusing spent fuel. -------------------- A Variety of Questions from Clinton 44 Next we have a variety of questions from Clinton. Clinton asked I would like some commentary in the current situation, why has hinkley gone off the rails, the new american approach, the odd things done after fukushima, the new radiation rules in the states. 45 Question 1 why has hinkley gone off the rails, 46 Answer The question refers to cost overruns at the Hinkley Point nuclear power project in the UK. The UK government looked into this issue in a more general sense in 2025. They published a report on it titled Nuclear Regulatory Review 2025 Enabling nuclear delivery through regulatory reform John Fingleton There is a link to the report in the show notes. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/692080f75c394e481336ab89/nuclear-regulatory-review-2025.pdf 47 As the report is 162 pages long, I won't try to cover it all in this answer. I will however give a few simple examples. The report focuses on civilian nuclear power and the defence nuclear industry as well. However it also draws examples from outside the nuclear industry to show that the problem is not limited to nuclear. It shows that the same problems exist in the offshore wind industry, and in the HS2 High Speed Rail project. 48 In the view of the authors of the report, the essence of the problem seems to be a lack of any degree of proportionality in terms of mitigating negative effects from any project. Big nuclear projects make the headlines because they are inherently big projects, but as I have just mentioned, they affect things like wind power development and rail transport as well. 49 I will pick one example from Hinkley Point specifically. This is "Case Study: Hinkley Point C Fish Protection" A summary of this is that they spent £700 million of additional money on the cooling water intakes to protect an estimated 0.083 salmon per year, along with 0.028 sea trout, 6 river lamprey, 18 Allis shad, and somewhere between 100 and 528 twaite shad. The report points out that there are ways to protect far more fish for far less money by spending it in other areas, and gives some examples. Again, this problem is not limited to nuclear power, and they give similar examples connected with offshore wind development and HS2 High Speed Rail. 50 I would like to emphasize that I am not expressing an opinion on whether or not any of these decisions were good or bad ones or whether the money was well spent. I am just summarizing the report's explanation of why large projects of all sorts initiated and approved by the UK parliament were not turning out as initially expected. I will leave it up to people in the UK to decide whether or not they are satisfied with the current situation. 51 Question 2 the new american approach, 52 Answer The US have apparently announced changes to their regulatory system. I don't know enough about the subject to really judge the practical effects of regulation within the US. However, I have read and listened to many interviews of people from both the industry and the regulatory side of things who are from outside the US but are familiar with it. They generally contrast two different approaches to regulation. On the one hand there is the US approach, which they see as being more of a box ticking exercise than an in depth safety review. This makes it very hard to get a design other than a traditional PWR or BWR approved in the US. 53 It has the advantage from the regulator side of things though in that it reduces the amount of work required as it primarily requires just following a set of defined procedures. These people then contrast that approach with the one used in the UK and in Canada, both of which they see as being very similar to one another. In those two countries, regulators work with industry to review designs from basic principles rather than just seeing if it meets a pre-defined list of criteria. This is a results oriented system rather than a process oriented system as used in the US. 54 As a result of this, designers of new nuclear reactors are going to the UK and Canada first to go through preliminary review there, and only going to the US later. What designers are looking for is feedback on their design as they go along in order to align the design with what safety regulators see as being required from their standpoint. They want to go into a review process before the design is finalized so they can get guidance on how they should approach things rather than trying to add safety as additional features on top of a finished design. 55 It would take someone with deep familiarity with nuclear regulation systems to understand the practical effects of recent changes in US regulatory systems, but it is quite possible that people within the regulatory structure in the US have been taking the above on board and trying to adapt to current circumstances. However, I can only speculate on that. This is about the best answer that I can give. 56 Question 3 the odd things done after fukushima, 57 Answer This covers a lot of topics, some of which are probably political and so are not suited to HPR. I will try to list a few events however. As a brief summary if the Fukushima events go however, a historic scale earthquake and tsunami in Japan in 2011 caused huge loss of life and widespread damage. About 20,000 people were killed by the earthquake and tsunami. Three nuclear reactors based on 1960s era GE BWR designs were seriously damaged by hydrogen explosions caused by loss of power to backup generators when they were flooded by the tsunami. However, there were no radiation related deaths or cases of radiation sickness. 58 Following events in Japan was a general review of designs around the world, with various improvements made in some areas, particularly backup generators and hydrogen management. It seems to be conventional wisdom that the Fukushima event caused a number of countries to decide to phase out nuclear power. 59 However, when I tried to make a list of such countries for this episode I found things were not as is often heard. The countries which decided to get rid of nuclear power had largely started down that road at least a decade before then and generally for reasons unrelated to any specific events outside of their own country. In other cases they reversed that decision or are in the process of doing so. Japan itself has restarted many of their nuclear power plants and plant to replace decommissioned nuclear power plants with new ones, although many of the older and smaller ones were considered not economically worth upgrading at this point in their life to restart them. 60 The one possible exception to this may be Taiwan which decided to phase out nuclear power in 2016. However, I don't know enough about Taiwanese politics to state with any confidence that their decision in 2016 was based on anything related to events in Japan, or whether in fact they were a byproduct of other political changes within Taiwan and the shut down of nuclear plants happened to be carried along with those. Currently Taiwan get their electricity primarily from natural gas and coal. 61 Meanwhile across mainland Asia from Turkey to China, large numbers of nuclear power plants were built or are under construction. Taken together on a global scale, did anything really change after Fukushima, or did the countries which had already decided to close down their nuclear power plants simply continue to do so, and those countries who decided they wanted more of them continue to build them? That's a good question for which I don't think anyone has the perspective to answer at this point. 62 Another side of this which is hard to disentangle from it though is the increased use of natural gas for electric power generation which was happening at around the same time. Increased use of fracking in a number of countries, plus increased supplies from Russia and LNG from the Middle East and other places resulted in falls in natural gas prices in many places. Since combined cycle natural gas turbines form the main competitor to nuclear power, anything which improves the economics of natural gas will act to reduce demand for nuclear power. This makes it hard to decide to what degree the reduction in the number of reactors being built was due to the political effects of the earthquake and tsunami and to what degree it was due to cheaper natural gas through fracking and other means. I'll leave that question at that. 63 Question 4 the new radiation rules in the states. 64 Answer I'm not deeply familiar with US radiation rules, but I will attempt to answer the question. Apparently there are wide variety of different things being addressed, only some of which have any relevance to the nuclear power industry. One of these is an epidemiological study on the current exposure limits for workers in the nuclear industry. This study will take place over about 5 years. In the end it may not result in any changes. This is for a number of reasons. 65 One is that US exposure thresholds for workers are currently aligned with international standards. It would be difficult for the US industry to operate on a different basis than the rest of the world when supply chains are global and kit is designed to meet currently recognized standards. Another is that apparently the nuclear industry are not, so far as I can discern, asking for any changes to limits. They instead are looking for changes to how some of the details are being applied, such as for example the criteria for deciding when respirators are required in low risk environments. 66 Some point to recent changes in UK regulations as an example of what they are looking for. I will post a link to the new (November of 2025) UK regulations in the show notes. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/nuclear-industry-principles-to-guide-the-application-of-as-low-as-reasonably-practicable-alarp-and-best-available-techniques-bat/ways-of-working-principles-to-guide-the-application-of-alarp-and-bat-in-the-nuclear-industry-accessible-webpage This is about as much detail as I think I can comment on when it comes to this question, as I think it is a subject that requires a fair bit more practical knowledge of than I have in order to give a thorough and balanced answer. -------------------- 67 Question from Antoine Were/are the designs patented? Hi, Whiskeyjack. Nice ep. You said AGR, based on Magnox, was a nuclear reactor type that did not sell well outside the UK. I then started thinking if it were (is) possible to another countries to develop by themselves based on that project, or if it had (has) a commercial restriction for exploration of the technology. I have yet to listen to the following episodes (doing little by little) and may learn better on the choices, but I felt free to present the question by now... Thanks! 68 Answer This is a very good question because it offers the opportunity to talk about a number of interesting things that haven't been touched on yet. Let's cover a bit of background first. 69 A patent is a time limited right to exploit a defined bit of valuable technical knowledge. Patents were involved from the very earliest days of commercial nuclear power, and I will give an example of this later. A key point to keep in mind though is that the nuclear power field moves very slowly and it takes a long time for new knowledge to make it from the lab to commercial application. Patents will often expire before they reach the point where they can be used. 70 Contracts on the other hand are legally enforceable agreements between two parties. A contract may have a time limited life, but that is an arrangement between the parties. A commercial nuclear power plant is a very large and complex bit of kit and not easily copied in detail. It can be far more effective to cover designs under contracts and licenses than to rely on patents. If a country wished to build their own nuclear power plants rather than buying them from someone else, there are a large number of companies who have commercial designs they are willing to license to third parties for them to build themselves. Indeed a number of these companies base their business around licensing of designs or have other reasons for wishing to do so. 71 From a licensee perspective, it could take decades of work and hundreds of millions or even billions of dollars to take a design from first principle to the ready to build state, wheras licensing a design give you a proven design right away. As mentioned in previous episodes, there many types of reactor in the world. The selection of what sort of reactor a country decides to buy often depends more on commercial considerations revolving around licensing terms and conditions than it does with respect to any technical considerations. Here's an example which shows how South Korea decided to license a design, build it for themselves, and then export it to other countries. 72 KunMo Chung - Professor at the Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, stated in an interview in 2019 that South Korea wanted to standardize on a single reactor technology in the early 1980s. They had reactors from multiple different vendors, but wanted to license an existing successful design to produce for themselves and for the export market. One of the major factors in deciding to standardize was to allow them to improve operator training by focusing on one design. Professor Chung stated that one of the key factors in selecting a design from ABB-Combustion Engineering was that he personally knew and had a good relationship with the Chief Technical Officer of ABB-Combustion Engineering going back to a time when Professor Chung had been studying and working in the USA. 73 On their side, ABB-Combustion Engineering were having financial problems and they needed a partner to help further develop their new PWR design. Also they stood to gain revenue from this partnership as well. Based on this relationship, the two sides came to a business agreement and South Korea began producing reactors based on this design, while also continuing to develop and improve it further. 74 Here's an example of a case where the developers of a promising technology decided that they had more to gain by not patenting their technology. Instead they decided to freely share their information in order to get other researchers elsewhere to help to advance the technology so that all could benefit from it. 75 In an interview Wacław Gudowski - Prof. Emeritus, Royal Institute of Technology KTH Stockholm stated that the Soviets and later the Russian were the leaders in lead-bismuth cooled reactors. These reactors use lead-bismuth liquid metal alloy as a coolant. In the 1990s the Russian institute working on commercializing this technology were working with Western partners on nuclear technology in general. They considered patenting this technology, but in the end decided to simply publish it openly. 76 Professor Gudowski had even smuggled $60,000 in cash into Russia to finance the patent application in order to get the Russian institute to publish their technology, but the money was not needed. They based this decision on the judgment that it would take 20 years of R&D before the technology was ready for the commercial market, so they wouldn't see a penny on any patents anyway. They were right on this, as it was another 20 years of R&D in Europe, Russia, China, and Korea before lead-bismuth technology was ready for commercial use. 77 It had already seen use in submarine reactors, but the commercial market demanded a more thoroughly developed technology to satisfy commercial needs. By deciding to not patent the technology, the original developers gained from shared R&D rather than chasing the illusary gains from patent licenses on technology that was not ready for the commercial market anyway. 78 I said that patents were involved in nuclear technology from the very earliest days, and I will now turn to that story. When I say the earliest days, I mean probably earlier than you are imaging. I am talking about before WWII. 79 First though I need to give some background information. France and Britain were working on nuclear weapons from the very earliest days of WWII. In Britain's case this was called Tube Alloys. Canada also was conducting nuclear experiments, including building an "atomic pile", but it's not clear if this had any clear practical goals or was done to understand the physics better. 80 If you read the Wikipedia version of history, it states that Tube Alloys was merged into the Manhattan Project. However, participants have stated in interviews that this was not the case, and the Quebec Agreement which supposedly merged them makes no such mention of any merger of the projects, just the setting up of a board to coordinate efforts between the three countries, that is the US, UK, and Canada. In fact the two projects didn't get along that well, and as we shall see below, a big part of that was disputes over patents. ### 81 The following is based on a paper written by Bertrand Goldschmidt, a French nuclear scientist. Two of his colleagues, Hans Halban and Lew Kowarski played a critical role in early nuclear research. Halban in particular was one of the greatest scientific names in nuclear fission. In March of 1939 Halban conducted an experiment showing that neutrons were emitted by the fissioning of uranium. 82 In April Joliot, Halban, Kowarski and Perrin had a pretty good idea of how to use nuclear fission to produce energy and to make an explosive device and decided to file patents on their invention. Each of the four would receive a 5% share of any benefits and the other 80% would go to the research instittute they worked at in Paris. I will now quote from Goldschmidt's paper. 83 The first two patents concerned energy production and were entitled "Device for energy production" and "Method for stabilizing a device for energy production." They roughly defined the principles of the main components of our present power reactors: moderator in heterogeneous or homogeneous arrangements, cooling fluid, control rods, protection shield. The third patent called "Method for perfecting explosive charges" was less brilliant from a foresight point of view though it proposed valid solutions for the trigger, the tamper, and the rapid obtainment of the critical assembly of a possible explosive device. Finally, nearly a year later, after Alfred Nier's experimental confirmation in March 1940 of Niels Bohr's theoretical prediction that uranium 235, the rare isotope of the mixture in natural uranium, was responsible for fission by slow neutrons, the French took out an additional patent on the advantage of using enriched uranium for the chain reaction. End of quote. 84 In May of 1940, the CNRS, the French research institute in Paris, negotiated an agreement with Belgian mining company Union Miniere, who were the world's biggest producer of uranium, at the time a byproduct of radium mining, about a partnership for the world wide exploitation of these patents. However the agreement was not finalized due to the ongoing events in the war. At the beginning of the war, the French government had approved the development of an energy generator - or a nuclear reactor as we would say today, with the intention of creating an engine for submarines. 85 With the fall of France, Halban and Kowarski travelled to the UK with their supply of heavy water where they were received by their UK counterparts, James Chadwick and John Cockroft. The British were already working on an atomic bomb. In the UK the two conducted an experiment showing that it was possible to create nuclear energy using natural uranium and heavy water. In 1941 the British nuclear project was reorganized and given the name Tube Alloys. In 1942 it was decided to move the work on a plutonium bomb to Canada, and Canada would pay for the project. A lab was set up in Montreal and Halban was put in charge of the project. 86 Halban had negotiated this arrangement by offering to arrange to have the French patents for world wide rights outside of France and the French empire transferred to the UK. In return the French team were to be given a key role in the British nuclear project. The author of the paper I am referencing, Bertrand Goldschmidt, was a section leader in Montreal and a colleague of Halban from France. The Montreal group cooperated with the American Manhattan Project and the two shared information and exchanged visits. 87 However, relations between the two began to break down, with a major cause of this being the Americans being unhappy about the French patents and Halban's arrangement to give the British world wide rights to them. The postwar commercial potential for nuclear power was seen to be huge, and this was a major bone of contention. The extensive participation of ICI (Imperial Chemical Industries) engineers in the Tube Alloys project was also objectionable to the Americans. Presumably this had something to do with potential for ICI being involved in future commercialization of the technology. The American Dupont company, a commercial rival of ICI, was also heavily involved in the American atomic bomb project. The eventual result of this was that the US cut off cooperation with the UK-Canada nuclear project. 88 Finally Halban was forced out of the project at the insistence of the Americans, and he was replaced by John Cockroft who moved to Montreal to take charge of the project. The Americans now restore limited cooperation. Kowarski was put in charge of building a heavy water moderated natural uranium reactor at a new site north of Ottawa at Chalk River. This reactor was turned on on the 5th of September, 1945, three days after Japan's surrender. So in what was supposedly a titanic war for survival, key allies were falling out with respect to their ultimate weapon over issues of patents covering post war commercialization. 89 With the end of the war, the nuclear weapons project in Montreal and Chalk River was wound up. Halban, Kowarski, and Goldschmidt returned to France and Cockroft to the UK where they all played senior roles in the nuclear programs of their respective countries. John Cockroft played an important role in the development of the Magnox reactors which Antoine asked about. The Chalk River Site remains as Canada's main nuclear research centre to this day, and Canada was to continue development of heavy water moderated natural uranium reactors. 90 The first commercial nuclear power plant was commissioned in the UK in 1956, roughly 17 years after the original French nuclear patents. At that time, UK patents had a term of 16 years. While I am not a patent lawyer, it would appear that these patents would likely have expired before nuclear power was ever commercialized. So to answer the question about patents, the first patents on nuclear energy date to before WWII started, and the very first two were about nuclear power plants and it was only the third one which covered nuclear weapons. -------------------- 91 Thanks to other listeners. A number of other listeners made comments saying they were really enjoying the series. I would like to thank the following for their kind words of encouragement. They helped make the work required to do this worthwhile. They are brian-in-ohio mnw Clinton Antoine bjb Kevin O'Brien Trey L'andrew Archer72 Jim DeVore If you have commented but I have forgotten your name, or if the show was recorded before I got a chance to read your comment, I would still like to thank you. 92 Conclusion I would like to thank all the listeners for their kind comments and insightful questions. I hope that I have answered these questions to the satisfaction of everyone. I look forward to hearing from all of you in future podcast episodes including those on other topics. -------------------- Proceedings of the 29th annual conference of the Canadian Nuclear Association and 10th annual conference of the Canadian Nuclear Society. V. 1-3 https://inis.iaea.org/records/m2s41-40917 This has a paper by Bertrand Goldschmidt about the work of the French scientists in Canada. -------------------- Provide feedback on this episode.

Mise sous pression par le blocage du détroit d'Ormuz, Taïwan tente de relancer son programme nucléaire. La petite île au large de la Chine importe plus de 95% de son énergie et est en temps normal sous pression, notamment vis-à-vis de son industrie de semi-conducteurs très gourmande en énergie. Pour assurer à Taïwan une meilleure autonomie, le président taïwanais, dont le parti était le fer de lance antinucléaire du pays, annonce vouloir relancer les centrales nucléaires taïwanaises, à peine un an après leur fermeture. De notre correspondant à Taipei, Le petit port de pêche touristique de YeLiu, au nord de Taïwan, est situé à quelques kilomètres seulement de l'une des deux centrales nucléaires concernées par le projet de réouverture. Son dernier réacteur a été mis hors service il y a seulement trois ans, mais ces habitants attablés pour le déjeuner pensent que le remettre en route est la seule solution viable. « Pourquoi est-ce qu'ils veulent relancer le nucléaire ? Parce qu'à Taïwan, on manque d'électricité ! Le charbon, ça pollue. L'éolien n'est pas assez efficace. Le nucléaire, par contre, si c'est bien géré, aucun problème », assure un homme. Pragmatiques, ces Taïwanais pensent moins aux risques d'accidents nucléaires qu'aux opportunités d'emploi dans la région. « Ça fait aussi plus de travail pour notre communauté, il y a plus d'avantages que d'inconvénients », complète-t-il. L'annonce de relance de centrale n'enchante guère les associations opposées au nucléaire Mais à Taïwan, le nucléaire est loin de faire l'unanimité. Pour la secrétaire générale de la plus importante association citoyenne opposé au nucléaire, le traumatisme de l'accident de Fukushima ne doit pas être oublié : « Le séisme de 2011 qui a provoqué l'accident nucléaire de Fukushima a eu beaucoup d'impact sur Taïwan. Taïwan et le Japon sont des régions similaires, avec de nombreux séismes. Il faut continuer à tirer les leçons de cet événement. Quand on a la preuve de nouvelles failles géologiques, on ne devrait pas relancer le nucléaire. » Après l'accident de Fukushima, des centaines de milliers de personnes ont manifesté plusieurs années dans les rues, au prix d'une victoire : celle de l'arrêt total de tous les réacteurs du pays. La dernière centrale a fermé ses portes en mai 2025. Avec cette annonce de relance, le mouvement antinucléaire est prêt à s'opposer une nouvelle fois au gouvernement. « Nous espérons pouvoir cette fois encore gagner, car en réalité, les problèmes d'hier et ceux d'aujourd'hui n'ont pas changé. Taïwan est toujours une région à forte activité sismique. Et les centrales nucléaires de Taïwan sont toujours situées dans des zones urbaines densément peuplées. Nous estimons que les conditions n'ont pas changé. Nos inquiétudes restent les mêmes », poursuit-elle. À lire aussiTaïwan: manifestation de rejet du nucléaire La Chine veut « offrir à Taïwan une garantie fiable pour sa sécurité énergétique » Bien consciente des difficultés de Taïwan pour assurer son autonomie énergétique, la Chine tente elle aussi de s'immiscer dans le débat, via son porte-parole des affaires taiwanaises, quelques semaines après le début de la guerre en Iran. « Après une réunification pacifique, nous pourrions tout à fait compenser les pénuries de Taïwan en électricité, en gaz naturel, en pétrole brut... et offrir à Taïwan une garantie fiable pour sa sécurité énergétique », alimente le porte-parole. Pour ne dépendre ni du détroit d'Ormuz, ni de la Chine, le gouvernement taïwanais espère pouvoir relancer deux de ses centrales nucléaires d'ici 2029. À lire aussiTaiwan : l'île des Orchidées, un paradis radioactif

Der Tschernobyl-Jahrestag offenbart die Risiken emotionaler Politik. Den „Tagesanbruch" gibt es auch zum Nachlesen unter [t-online.de/tagesanbruch](https://www.t-online.de/tagesanbruch) Anmerkungen, Lob und Kritik gern an podcasts@t-online.de Den „Tagesanbruch“-Podcast gibt es immer montags bis freitags ab 6 Uhr zum Start in den Tag vorgelesen von einer freundlichen KI-Stimme – am Wochenende mit einer tiefgründigeren Diskussion. Verpassen Sie keine Folge und abonnieren Sie uns bei [Spotify] https://open.spotify.com/show/3v1HFmv3V3Zvp1R4BT3jlO?si=klrETGehSj2OZQ_dmB5Q9g), [Apple Podcasts](https://itunes.apple.com/de/podcast/t-online-tagesanbruch/id1374882499?mt=2), [Amazon Music](https://music.amazon.de/podcasts/961bad79-b3ba-4a93-9071-42e0d3cdd87f/tagesanbruch-von-t-online) oder überall sonst, wo es Podcasts gibt. Wenn Ihnen der Podcast gefällt, lassen Sie gern eine Bewertung da.

40 ans après l'explosion du réacteur 4 de la centrale ukrainienne, la prise en charge de l'accident et de ses conséquences continue de faire débat, reportage en Ukraine et retour sur les réactions en Allemagne. Également dans cette émission : La revue sonore des médias européens ; L'Italie offre une prime aux juges qui convaincront les migrants de quitter le pays ; La Moldavie célèbre les Pâques des Bienheureux.  Le 26 avril 1986, le monde sous le choc de Tchernobyl En Ukraine  La plus grande catastrophe nucléaire civile à ce jour, devant celle de Fukushima, est survenue à Tchernobyl, en URSS, le 26 avril 1986. Elle a entraîné l'évacuation de dizaines de milliers de personnes. Il a fallu des années, et l'intervention de plusieurs centaines de milliers de personnes au fil du temps, pour contenir et atténuer les conséquences de l'accident, que ce soit sur le site lui-même et dans la zone d'exclusion, d'un rayon de 30 km autour de la centrale. Habitants, employés de la centrale, liquidateurs et leurs familles ont souvent été relogés autour de la capitale ukrainienne, où la catastrophe entre aujourd'hui en résonnance avec la guerre. Emmanuelle Chaze y a retrouvé des familles qui témoignent et racontent leurs souvenirs. En Allemagne  Cet accident qui a eu des retombées mondiales, qu'elles soient sanitaires, économiques ou politiques, a été tout d'abord dissimulé puis minimisé par les autorités soviétiques. Ce n'est que deux jours après l'explosion que la Suède, constatant des radiations élevées autour de l'une de ses centrales civiles, comprend que des particules radioactives arrivent de l'Est. Le fameux nuage si controversé a touché de très nombreux pays à des degrés divers, dont l'Allemagne, alors divisée entre RFA et RDA ; deux entités qui n'ont pas répondu aux événements de la même façon, Delphine Nerbollier.   Dans les médias européens, par Franceline Beretti Tchernobyl encore : en France, les autorités se sont démarquées de leurs voisins ; quatre jours après le vote en Bulgarie, la presse européenne a tranché sur la personnalité de Roumen Radev ; à Katyn, la Russie réécrit encore l'histoire à sa façon.   En Italie, le monde de la justice est en ébullition depuis 48h : le Sénat italien a approuvé le nouveau décret sécurité du gouvernement ; il stipule que les avocats qui aideront les migrants en situation irrégulière à demander leur rapatriement toucheront une prime payée par l'État. Les précisions de Cécile Debarge. À lire aussiItalie: l'État condamné à dédommager un migrant transféré illégalement en Albanie En Moldavie, les Pâques des « Bienheureux », autrement nommée Pâques des morts, est une tradition dans plusieurs pays slaves, mais elle est particulièrement importante en Moldavie, où elle est d'ailleurs marquée par un jour férié. Une semaine après la Pâque orthodoxe, cette fête du même nom est l'occasion de rendre hommage aux disparus, et ça se passe donc dans les cimetières, où les familles se rassemblent pour partager un repas presque sacré dans la religion orthodoxe, et pour célébrer les souvenirs et la vie des personnes qui ne sont plus. Reportage de notre correspondante en Moldavie, Marine Leduc.

Más secreto que el desastre de 1986, el complejo nuclear de Mayak protagonizó en 1957 una explosión química que liberó enormes cantidades de radiación. El accidente, conocido como Kyshtym, contaminó miles de kilómetros cuadrados y afectó a cientos de miles de personas. Aunque la Unión Soviética lo ocultó durante décadas, es considerado el tercer peor desastre nuclear, solo por detrás de Chernóbil y Fukushima. Y descubre más historias curiosas en el canal National Geographic y en Disney +. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

40 ans après l'explosion du réacteur 4 de la centrale ukrainienne, la prise en charge de l'accident et de ses conséquences continue de faire débat, reportage en Ukraine et retour sur les réactions en Allemagne. Également dans cette émission : La revue sonore des médias européens ; L'Italie offre une prime aux juges qui convaincront les migrants de quitter le pays ; La Moldavie célèbre les Pâques des Bienheureux.  Le 26 avril 1986, le monde sous le choc de Tchernobyl En Ukraine  La plus grande catastrophe nucléaire civile à ce jour, devant celle de Fukushima, est survenue à Tchernobyl, en URSS, le 26 avril 1986. Elle a entraîné l'évacuation de dizaines de milliers de personnes. Il a fallu des années, et l'intervention de plusieurs centaines de milliers de personnes au fil du temps, pour contenir et atténuer les conséquences de l'accident, que ce soit sur le site lui-même et dans la zone d'exclusion, d'un rayon de 30 km autour de la centrale. Habitants, employés de la centrale, liquidateurs et leurs familles ont souvent été relogés autour de la capitale ukrainienne, où la catastrophe entre aujourd'hui en résonnance avec la guerre. Emmanuelle Chaze y a retrouvé des familles qui témoignent et racontent leurs souvenirs. En Allemagne  Cet accident qui a eu des retombées mondiales, qu'elles soient sanitaires, économiques ou politiques, a été tout d'abord dissimulé puis minimisé par les autorités soviétiques. Ce n'est que deux jours après l'explosion que la Suède, constatant des radiations élevées autour de l'une de ses centrales civiles, comprend que des particules radioactives arrivent de l'Est. Le fameux nuage si controversé a touché de très nombreux pays à des degrés divers, dont l'Allemagne, alors divisée entre RFA et RDA ; deux entités qui n'ont pas répondu aux événements de la même façon, Delphine Nerbollier.   Dans les médias européens, par Franceline Beretti Tchernobyl encore : en France, les autorités se sont démarquées de leurs voisins ; quatre jours après le vote en Bulgarie, la presse européenne a tranché sur la personnalité de Roumen Radev ; à Katyn, la Russie réécrit encore l'histoire à sa façon.   En Italie, le monde de la justice est en ébullition depuis 48h : le Sénat italien a approuvé le nouveau décret sécurité du gouvernement ; il stipule que les avocats qui aideront les migrants en situation irrégulière à demander leur rapatriement toucheront une prime payée par l'État. Les précisions de Cécile Debarge. À lire aussiItalie: l'État condamné à dédommager un migrant transféré illégalement en Albanie En Moldavie, les Pâques des « Bienheureux », autrement nommée Pâques des morts, est une tradition dans plusieurs pays slaves, mais elle est particulièrement importante en Moldavie, où elle est d'ailleurs marquée par un jour férié. Une semaine après la Pâque orthodoxe, cette fête du même nom est l'occasion de rendre hommage aux disparus, et ça se passe donc dans les cimetières, où les familles se rassemblent pour partager un repas presque sacré dans la religion orthodoxe, et pour célébrer les souvenirs et la vie des personnes qui ne sont plus. Reportage de notre correspondante en Moldavie, Marine Leduc.

After the Fukushima disaster shut down Japan's nuclear reactors, the coal industry rushed in to fill the energy gap. As climate advocate Kimiko Hirata watched dozens of new coal plant proposals quietly surface across the country — each one locking in decades of future emissions — she resolved to make them impossible to ignore. She shares how a small, scrappy civil society movement took on a fossil-fuel-dependent economy and got people to say "yes" to a renewable future.Learn more about our flagship conference happening this April at attend.ted.com/podcast Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

This week Howie is joined by Linda Pentz Gunter, Executive Director of Beyond Nuclear, for a discussion about her just-published book: No to Nuclear: Why Nuclear Power Destroys Lives, Derails Climate Progress and Provokes War.Links Shared During the Stream:Linda Pentz Gunter, No to Nuclear: Why Nuclear Power Destroys Lives, Derails Climate Progress and Provokes War (Pluto Press, 2026), https://www.plutobooks.com/product/no-to-nuclear/Beyond Nuclear, https://beyondnuclear.org/Howie Hawkins, "Fighting Radioactive Wastewater Dumping from New York to Fukushima,” June 21, 2023, https://howiehawkins.us/project/report-back-from-the-global-greens-congress/https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2026/02/putin-tried-to-freeze-ukraine-instead-he-sparked-an-energy-revolution/https://howiehawkins.us/reverse-the-new-nuclear-arms-race/https://clamshellalliance.com/Streamed on 4/18/26Watch the video at: https://youtube.com/live/Os3LtrRBfEgGreen Socialist Notes is a weekly livestream/podcast hosted by 2020 Green Party/Socialist Party presidential nominee, Howie Hawkins.  Started as a weekly campaign livestream in the spring of 2020, the streams have continued post elections and are now under the umbrella of the Green Socialist Organizing Project, which grew out of the 2020 presidential campaign.  Green Socialist Notes seeks to provide both an independent Green Socialist perspective, as well as link listeners up with opportunities to get involved in building a real people-powered movement in their communities.Green Socialist Notes PodcastEvery Saturday at 3:00 PM EDT on Facebook, YouTube, and Twitch.Every Monday at 7:00 AM EDT on most major podcast outlets.Music by Gumbo le FunqueIntro: She Taught UsOutro: #PowerLoveFreedom

What does it take to turn crisis into a leadership framework others can actually use? In this episode, Bill Sherman talks with John Lentini, President of Culture, Strategy, Learning & Development at Crestcom International, about how defining moments can become disciplined thinking, practical models, and a mission that is bigger than one person's story. John's path to thought leadership did not begin in theory. It began in high-stakes moments. He reflects on surviving 9/11, leading through the Fukushima crisis, and learning firsthand that character is not an abstract idea. It is revealed under pressure. More importantly, he argues it can be built with intention. At the center of the conversation is John's six-dial framework for what he calls engineering character, which can be found in his upcoming book Engineering Character: Six Dials to Build Better Leaders releasing March 2027. He explains how discipline, mindset, and resilience help leaders lead themselves first. Then integrity, empathy, and influence help them lead others in ways that build trust. The result is a model designed to make character practical, teachable, and repeatable. This episode also goes deeper than framework talk. Bill and John explore the personal cost of leadership, the difference between good leadership and bad leadership, and the tension leaders feel when corporate expectations collide with personal values. John is candid about where he got it right, where he got it wrong, and why those lessons now shape his work as a speaker, facilitator, and leadership thinker. There is also a powerful thread on authenticity. John shares why he ultimately chose to step outside corporate life and use thought leadership to express ideas more fully and more honestly. For him, this work is not about visibility for its own sake. It is about impact. It is about getting a message into the world that helps people lead with more courage, more empathy, and more character. Listeners will also hear John talk about the writing journey behind his forthcoming book on engineering character, the emotional work of putting real life on the page, and why he chose a hybrid publishing path. No previously published book by John is named in the transcript, but this episode clearly positions his upcoming book as the foundation of his thought leadership platform and future speaking work. If you care about leadership under pressure, values in action, and the challenge of turning lived experience into a message that scales, this conversation delivers. It is honest. It is practical. And it shows how thought leadership is often built not from abstract ideas, but from moments that test who we are. Three Key Takeaways: • Character can be built on purpose. The episode centers on the idea that leadership character is not just innate. It can be developed through intentional habits like discipline, mindset, resilience, integrity, empathy, and influence. • Crisis reveals what leadership really looks like. High-pressure moments expose whether leaders act with preparation, courage, empathy, and trust. The conversation shows how extreme events can shape a lasting leadership philosophy. • Authenticity matters more as leadership grows. A major theme is the tension between corporate expectations and personal values, and how thought leadership can become a way to express ideas more honestly and create broader impact. If John Lentini's episode made you think about how character is tested in moments of crisis, then "Thought Leadership for Crisis Management | Helio Fred Gracia" is the perfect next listen. Where John explores leadership through resilience, integrity, empathy, and trust under pressure, Helio extends that conversation by showing how leaders can prepare for crises before they happen, protect trust when things go wrong, and respond with clarity instead of emotion. Together, the two episodes create a powerful one-two combination on crisis, character, and the disciplined leadership choices that matter most when the stakes are high.

Dizem que de Espanha nem bom vento nem bom casamento, mas a boa música passa fronteiras. Tiago Crispim é o nosso correspondente em Madrid.

The Elephant’s Foot – Chernobyl’s melted radioactive core Arnie Gundersen on New Safe Confinement Problems, Fukushima Comparison Russian drone attack punches hole in New Safe Confinement structure; $2 billion minimum to fix! Bulgarian Chernobyl Survivor Bonnie Kouneva The Nuclear Resister with Jack Cohen-Joppa

In this FocusCore podcast episode, host David Sweet interviews Yuri Kageyama, an Associated Press reporter who grew up in both the US and Japan, attended international school and Huntsville High, and became bilingual through her father's engineering career with NASA and IHI. Kage recounts being hired on the spot by The Japan Times, learning newspaper reporting and production, then choosing AP over other offers to write her own stories; AP sent her to Detroit during peak Japan-bashing, where she covered autos, crime, and policing and learned to focus on telling people's stories despite prejudice.She discusses thinking and writing primarily in English, the cultural complexity of Japanese politeness, and AP's fact-based standards amid today's fragmented media environment.Yuri describes covering the Fukushima nuclear disaster and creating the multimedia performance/film “News from Fukushima,” including AP script review, then reads her poem “Fukushima” and reflects on the disaster's ongoing impact, collaboration with artists, and balancing journalism with poetry.The 2026 FocusCore Salary Guide is here: 2026 Salary GuideIn this episode you will hear:Yuri's journey to becoming a bilingual reporter with the Associated PressThe cultural and language challenges she navigated between Japan and the USInsights into the creative process behind "News from Fukushima" and its impactHer experiences covering pivotal events like the Fukushima disasterThe blend of journalism and poetry in exploring complex narrativesAbout Yuri:Yuri Kageyama is a reporter with the Associated Press.She grew up in the US and in Japan, and is a graduate of Cornell University, and she holds an MA in interdisciplinary field of sociology, anthropology, and social psychology from the University of California Berkeley.She is also an outstanding polymath as a celebrated poet fiction writer, essays journalist, filmmaker, and songwriter.Connect with Yuri:LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/yurikageyama/Website: http://yurikageyama.com/Connect with David Sweet:LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/drdavidsweet/Twitter: https://twitter.com/focuscorejpFacebook: :https://www.facebook.com/focuscoreasiaInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/focuscorejp/Website: https://www.japan.focuscoregroup.com/This podcast was proudly produced by Lisa Yasuda.“Doin' the Uptown Lowdown,” used by permission of Christopher Davis-Shannon. To find out more, check out www.thetinman.co. Support independent musicians and artists.

With NASA's Artemis II mission sending humans around the Moon for the first time since the 70s, we're bringing back one of our favorite episodes from 2024. The Krewe sat down with Dr. Kate Kitagawa of JAXA for a fascinating look at Japan's role in the global space race: from SLIM's pinpoint lunar landing to Japan's partnership in the Artemis program and beyond. If the Moon is on your mind right now, this one's for you. ++++++ OG Show Notes ++++++ Prepare for lift off as the Krewe sits down with returning guest Dr. Kate Kitagawa of JAXA to look deep into the past, present, and future of Japan's space program! From pencil rockets & SLIM landers to international collaborative efforts, discover Japan's role in exploring the far reaches of outer space. ------ About the Krewe ------ The Krewe of Japan Podcast is a weekly episodic podcast sponsored by the Japan Society of New Orleans. Check them out every Friday afternoon around noon CST on Apple, Google, Spotify, Amazon, Stitcher, or wherever you get your podcasts.  Want to share your experiences with the Krewe? Or perhaps you have ideas for episodes, feedback, comments, or questions? Let the Krewe know by e-mail at kreweofjapanpodcast@gmail.com or on social media (Twitter: @kreweofjapan, Instagram: @kreweofjapanpodcast, Facebook: Krewe of Japan Podcast Page, TikTok: @kreweofjapanpodcast, LinkedIn: Krewe of Japan LinkedIn Page, Blue Sky Social: @kreweofjapan.bsky.social, Threads: @kreweofjapanpodcast & the Krewe of Japan Youtube Channel). Until next time, enjoy! ------ Support the Krewe! Offer Links for Affiliates ------ Use the referral links below & our promo code from the episode! Support your favorite NFL Team AND podcast! Shop NFLShop to gear up for football season! Zencastr Offer Link - Use my special link to save 30% off your 1st month of any Zencastr paid plan!  ------ Past Episodes with Dr. Kate Kitagawa ------ The Age of Lady Samurai (S01E12) ------ Links about JAXA & Dr. Kate Kitagawa ------ JAXA (English) on Twitter JAXA (Japanese) on Twitter JAXA on Instagram JAXA (English) on Facebook JAXA (Japanese) on Facebook JAXA Website (Japanese) JAXA Website (English) ISAS (English) on Twitter ISAS (Japanese) on Twitter ISAS on Instagram JAXA on YouTube JAXA Space Education Center Website (English) MMX Game Lunarcraft Game SLIM The Pinpoint Moon Landing Game Kate's Book "The Secret Lives of Numbers" Kate's Website ------ JSNO Upcoming Events ------ JSNO Event Calendar Join JSNO Today!

核能 hé néng - nuclear energy風險 fēng xiǎn - risk核能發電 hé néng fā diàn - nuclear power generation儲存 chǔ cún - to store原子核 yuán zǐ hé - atomic nucleus能量 néng liàng - energy商業化 shāng yè huà - commercialization核分裂 hé fēn liè - nuclear fission原理 yuán lǐ - principle中子 zhōng zǐ - neutron撞擊 zhuàng jí - to collide with / impact重原子核 zhòng yuán zǐ hé - heavy atomic nucleus輕 qīng - light (in weight)釋放 shì fàng - to release巨大 jù dà - huge / enormous熱能 rè néng - thermal energy / heat energy高壓蒸氣 gāo yā zhēng qì - high-pressure steam推動 tuī dòng - to push / drive汽輪機 qì lún jī - turbine旋轉 xuán zhuǎn - to rotate / spin帶動 dài dòng - to drive / to set in motion發電機 fā diàn jī - generator高效率 gāo xiào lǜ - high efficiency燒水發電 shāo shuǐ fā diàn - power generation by heating water科學界 kē xué jiè - the scientific community核融合 hé róng hé - nuclear fusion模擬 mó nǐ - to simulate太陽 tài yáng - the sun無窮 wú qióng - endless / infinite無放射性 wú fàng shè xìng - non-radioactive廢料 fèi liào - waste material清潔能源 qīng jié néng yuán - clean energy低碳排放 dī tàn pái fàng - low carbon emissions二氧化碳 èr yǎng huà tàn - carbon dioxide淨零排放 jìng líng pái fàng - net-zero emissions密度 mì dù - density燃料 rán liào - fuel供電 gōng diàn - power supply運轉 yùn zhuǎn - to operate / run電網 diàn wǎng - power grid頻率 pín lǜ - frequency低廉 dī lián - inexpensive / low cost核電廠 hé diàn chǎng - nuclear power plant長期運轉 cháng qí yùn zhuǎn - long-term operation核廢料 hé fèi liào - nuclear waste存放 cún fàng - to store / keep衰變 shuāi biàn - radioactive decay永久處置 yǒng jiǔ chǔ zhì - permanent disposal廢料 fèi liào - waste material核災 hé zāi - nuclear disaster事故 shì gù - accident車諾比 chē nuò bǐ - Chernobyl福島 fú dǎo - Fukushima集體 jí tǐ - collective / group創傷 chuàng shāng - trauma退役 tuì yì - to retire from service拆解 chāi jiě - dismantling土地復育 tǔ dì fù yù - land restoration地震帶 dì zhèn dài - earthquake zone非核家園 fēi hé jiā yuán - nuclear-free homeland半導體產業 bàn dǎo tǐ chǎn yè - semiconductor industry台積電 tái jī diàn - TSMC (Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company)通貨膨脹 tōng huò péng zhàng - inflation連年調漲 lián nián tiáo zhǎng - to increase year after yearFollow me on Instagram: fangfang.chineselearning !

Join our Patreon to access early releases, ad-free episodes, and tons of bonus content, including all 25 episodes of Ash Learns the Bible!Back in February 2023, Ash was joined by hosts of Live, Laugh, Larceny, Amanda and Trevin to discuss the 2011 tsunami in Japan. It was the second most destructive tsunami of the 21st century... leaving 18,000 people dead or missing. It also caused the infamous disaster at the Fukushima power plant.March 11, 2026 marked the 15th anniversary of that devastating tragedy and the 2026 HBO documentary Fukushima: A Nuclear Nightmare chronicled those events incredibly well. 10/10 highly recommend!Listen to Amanda and Trevin on Live, Laugh, Larceny here:Listen on Apple https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/live-laugh-larceny/id1559664170Listen on Spotify:https://open.spotify.com/show/07BHoPqsPlOt4z8du7aX3O?si=6IaCIO18SkaX_x16ZcuNOAFollow Live, Laugh, Larceny on:Instagram: www.instagram.com/livelaughlarcenypodcastFacebook: www.facebook.com/livelaughlarcenypodcastTiktok: www.tiktok.com/@livelaughlarcenyIf you'd like to support my escape to Indonesia, check out the GOFUNDME :)Follow us on Instagram, where Ash is actually starting to post again!We'd love to see you in our Discord, come hang out!Audio editing by Malissa Coulson.Research assistance by Celi Riojas.

Em setembro de 1987, a cidade de Goiânia foi palco da maior tragédia radiológica do Brasil e uma das maiores do mundo. O que começou com a curiosidade diante de um pó azul que brilhava no escuro revelou-se uma sentença de morte para famílias inteiras. Neste programa, investigamos a sucessão de erros e negligências que permitiram que uma cápsula de Césio-137, abandonada em uma clínica desativada, fosse aberta em um ferro-velho. Analisamos o impacto humano devastador, desde o drama da pequena Leide das Neves até o estigma social enfrentado pelos sobreviventes. Exploramos também o contexto global, comparando o desastre brasileiro a eventos como Chernobyl e Fukushima, e discutimos como essa substância ainda está presente no nosso dia a dia, sob rígidos protocolos de segurança. Uma análise profunda sobre responsabilidade, tecnologia e a busca pela verdade histórica.

Power demand is rising faster than the systems meant to support it.AI, electrification, and industry all need stable energy, but the dominant story sold to the public was far simpler than reality. In this episode, Bret Kugelmass explains why the real bottleneck was never just climate ambition, but how the West misunderstood energy itself.For years, nuclear was framed as too dangerous, too slow, too expensive, and politically untouchable. Meanwhile, electricity demand kept rising, industrial resilience became strategic again, and the gap between energy ambition and physical reality widened.This conversation gets underneath the narrative. (Recorded November 2023)Bret Kugelmass, Founder and CEO of Last Energy, argues that the nuclear debate was never only about science or safety. It was also about incentives, regulation, public perception, delivery models, and the failure to distinguish what is inherent to the technology from what is imposed by the system around it.Drawing on his path from Silicon Valley entrepreneurship into deep energy infrastructure, Bret explains why he believes the West solved for the wrong variables, why wind and solar alone cannot carry modern industrial societies in many regions, and why the real breakthrough in nuclear may not come from reinventing the reactor, but from reinventing how power plants are built, sold, and deployed.As he puts it: (00:33:11) “Solve the wrong problem brilliantly and you'll be the only one who cares.”This episode is not just about nuclear energy. It is about first-principles thinking, product-market fit in deep tech, and the kind of contrarian founder logic required to build where politics, infrastructure, and capital collide.What You'll Learn in This Episode 1️⃣ Why Bret says the West misunderstood the real energy bottleneck 2️⃣ Why net zero may be the wrong framing for climate ambition 3️⃣ What most people still get wrong about nuclear waste, safety, and Fukushima 4️⃣ Why nuclear's real challenge is cost and construction, not physics 5️⃣ How Last Energy reframed the business by selling electricity, not reactors 6️⃣ What founders can learn from solving the right problem before scalingSelected Timestamps (00:04:29) Introduction (00:04:29) Defining climate goals beyond net zero (00:13:46) Bret discovers nuclear mission and truth (00:19:44) Chernobyl versus Fukushima what truly matters (00:21:39) Nuclear's unmatched physics for abundant energy (00:30:08) Ideal world nuclear plants in 18 months (00:36:02) Solving the right problem before building (00:42:58) First principles simplicity as Last Energy's edge (00:51:16) Securing 30 billion through true product market fit (00:54:05) Last Energy vision for tens of thousands of gigawatts (00:56:12) Taking ultimate responsibility to drive massive global progress

Welcome to your weekly UAS News Update. We have four stories for you this week. The Avata 360 is out, Second, DJI sues Insta360 just days before a major product launch, BRINC launches their new Guardian drone with Starlink integration, And micro-drones finally reach the bottom of the Fukushima nuclear reactor. Let's get to it.First up, the Avata 360 is out! It comes with 8K, 360° imaging, a 1 inch equivalent sensor, and 8K/60FPS in HDR! The Avata 360 also comes with the ability to fly the drone as a normal Avata, capturing 4K60FPS in single lens mode. Other features include obstacle avoidance in 360 mode, 23 minutes of flight time, integrated propeller guards, 42GB of internal storage, and replaceable front lenses! And the question that everyone will ask in the live on Monday: Compatible goggles include the Goggles 3 or Goggles N3 when using the Motion controller 3 or the FPV controller. In addition, the Avata 360 is compatible with the RC 2, RC-N2 and RC-N3.Speaking of, DJI has filed a patent ownership lawsuit against Insta360's parent company in China. They are targeting six patents that cover core drone technologies like flight control systems, structural design, and image processing.DJI is using a specific Chinese intellectual property law for this case, claiming these are "service inventions" created by former DJI engineers who went to work for Insta360. But Insta360's founder is pushing back hard. He stated that the main flight control patent in question is just a one-button "building dive" feature that isn't even used in their products. He also pointed out that Insta360 actually holds 28 patents that DJI products allegedly infringe upon.New up, BRINC has unveiled the Guardian, their next-generation Drone as First Responder, or DFR, platform. They also announced a new Seattle manufacturing facility to scale up production. The Guardian is the world's first Starlink-connected drone built for 911 response.BRINC claims the Guardian has an operational range of 8 mile and a flight time of 62 minutes! The drone features IP55 weather resistance, making it great for flying in the rain. The camera features 4K video with a 640x total zoom and dual HD thermal zoom cameras. In addition, BRINC has released the Guardian Station, a robotic charging nest that automatically swaps batteries and reloads payloads like Narcan or flotation devices without any human intervention.Last up, we have a real-world drones-for-good story! Fifteen years after the devastating earthquake and tsunami, palm-sized micro-drones have successfully flown inside the Unit 3 reactor at Fukushima and finally reached the bottom of the reactor pressure vessel.These tiny drones measure just 5.1 by 4.7 by 1.6 inches and weigh only 3.3 ounces, including the battery. Despite their small size, they carry a 2.7K camera shooting at 60 frames per second, two LED lights producing 380 lumens, and built-in radiation sensors. The airframes are IP52 rated and built to withstand up to 200 Gray of cumulative radiation exposure. During 13-minute flights, the drones mapped the pedestal floor and captured images of displaced control rod guide tubes and melted fuel debris. To keep the area completely airtight, crews used a custom seal box system to deploy and recover the drones without breaking containment. This is an absolutely incredible engineering achievement. A drone the size of a paperback book just mapped one of the most dangerous environments on earth, serving as a perfect reminder of why this technology is so important.Join us later in the community for Post Flight, where we'll discuss these stories and share our opinions that might not be suitable for YouTube. And we'll see you on Monday for the live.https://dronexl.co/2026/03/24/brinc-guardian-drone-starlink-911-response/https://dronexl.co/2026/03/23/dji-sues-insta360-patent-lawsuit-avata-360/https://dronexl.co/2026/03/23/drones-fly-fukushima-reactor/

Tras el desastre nuclear de Accidente nuclear de Fukushima, comenzaron a surgir relatos que van más allá de lo explicable.En este episodio de Lugares Misteriosos, exploramos los testimonios reales sobre los llamados fantasmas de Fukushima: apariciones, encuentros inexplicables y experiencias narradas por quienes aseguran haber visto lo que quedó después de la tragedia.¿Son manifestaciones paranormales, efectos del trauma colectivo o algo que aún no logramos comprender?Dale play y acompáñanos en este recorrido por uno de los casos más inquietantes donde la realidad y lo desconocido se cruzan.Si te interesan los misterios reales, el true crime y los fenómenos paranormales, sigue el canal y activa las notificaciones para no perderte ningún episodio.Conviértete en un supporter de este podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/lugares-misteriosos-casos-paranormales-y-crimenes-reales--4744170/support.

Chuck Todd opens with the two stories dominating the weekend: the Iran war's cascading economic consequences and Trump's vile celebration of Robert Mueller's death. On Iran, Chuck warns that rising energy costs with oil above $100 a barrel are not politically neutral — they function as a tax on existence that directly breaches the contract Trump's own voters signed up for — and that Trump is visibly panicking about gas prices because they disproportionately hurt his base. He argues that killing the Ayatollah was never going to topple the regime because the Iranian leadership doesn't operate as rational actors who can be deterred by suffering, that Trump made the same catastrophic miscalculation Putin made in Ukraine by assuming it would be easy, and that nobody in Trump's orbit will deliver bad news because there is now a North Korea-level sycophancy around the president. He then turns to Trump's Truth Social post celebrating the death of Mueller — a Bronze Star combat veteran, 12-year FBI director, and lifelong public servant who died at 81 from Parkinson's disease — in which Trump wrote "Good, I'm glad he's dead." Chuck notes that even Fox News' Brit Hume tweeted that this is why people don't merely oppose Trump but actively hate him. He argues that character matters in politics more than any policy position, and that Trump is fundamentally incapable of showing grace or knowing when to shut up He revisits the Mueller investigation itself, arguing that the real failure wasn't the probe's legal conclusions — which confirmed Russia took action to help elect Trump and that the campaign expected to benefit from stolen information — but that there were no consequences, and that Trump's refusal to acknowledge Russian help was never about innocence but about protecting the legitimacy of his presidency, with the entire GOP going along because copping to it would have been politically fatal. Finally, Chuck hops into the ToddCast Time Machine to revisit the nuclear meltdown incident at Three Mile Island and argues that it derailed a massive transition to nuclear energy that could have led to energy independence and potentially avoided multiple wars in the middle east. He also answers listeners’ questions in the “Ask Chuck” segment. Link in bio or go to https://getsoul.com & enter code TODDCAST for 30% off your first order. Take your personal data back with Incogni! Use code CHUCKTODDCAST at the link below and get 60% off an annual plan: https://incogni.com/chucktoddcast Thank you Wildgrain for sponsoring. Visit http://wildgrain.com/TODDCAST and use the code "TODDCAST" at checkout to receive $30 off your first box PLUS free Croissants for life! Timeline: (Timestamps may vary based on advertisements) 00:00 Chuck Todd’s introduction 04:15 Launching a new sports history podcast on Tuesday! 08:30 Noosphere interview with Joseph Allbriton 09:45 Providing local news services to the Washington D.C. area 11:30 Bezos didn’t live in DC, didn’t understand WaPo’s mission 12:45 The war in Iran is impacting everything. Everything else is downstream 13:15 Rising energy costs are not politically neutral, a tax on existing 14:15 Rising costs is a breach of the contract Trump voters signed up for 15:45 Iranian regime isn’t going to fight as rational actors, suffering doesn’t deter them 17:00 Killing the Ayatollah was never going to topple the regime 17:45 Nobody will give Trump bad news, he only hears what he wants to hear 19:00 There is a North Korea level of sycophancy around Trump 20:00 Trump made same mistake Putin made in Ukraine… thought it’d be easy 21:15 Trump alienated America’s allies, they want no part of his war 22:00 America is isolated and alone, but really need help from allies 23:45 Trump is finding out the hard way why other presidents didn’t hit Iran 25:15 Trump vacillates on his positions & messaging from day to day 26:15 Trump is panicking about gas prices, affects his voters the most 28:00 Trump celebrates Robert Mueller’s death in Truth Social post 29:45 The levels Trump will stoop to are truly sad 30:30 Brit Hume tweets “This is why people don’t just oppose Trump, they hate him” 31:15 Trump is incapable of ever showing grace or knowing when to shut up 32:15 Character matters in politics more than a policy position 33:15 Failure of Mueller investigation was no consequences for Russian meddling 34:30 Mueller report confirmed that Russia took action to help elect Trump 35:15 Wikileaks releases were very well curated & required American knowledge 37:30 Collusion wasn’t the crime, it was that Trump put himself above the country 39:15 Copping to Russian help would have delegitimized Trump, so GOP went along 40:30 People in Trump’s orbit were fine with Russian meddling since it helped them 41:30 Bob Mueller lived a life of public service, did not deserve Trump’s vile words 42:45 Trump’s supporters were mad about people mocking Charlie Kirk’s death 47:30 ToddCast Time Machine - March 28th, 1979 - Three Mile Island 48:30 It was the fear, not the details that defined the story of Three Mile Island 49:15 In the 60’s and 70’s the U.S. was rapidly building nuclear power plants 50:15 Operators at Three Mile Island acted logically, but warning system was flawed 52:30 Event happened near population center, which increased the panic 53:30 Jimmy Carter shown visiting site in protective gear, which shifted the psychology 55:45 US stopped building a nuclear future, and was dependent on foreign oil 56:45 Nuclear industry tried to recover in the 80s… then Chernobyl happened 58:15 Three Mile Island, Chernobyl and Fukushima all failed for different reasons 59:00 Without Three Mile Island, America’s energy system could look very different 1:01:00 Three Mile Island became a symbol of doubt in nuclear energy 1:01:45 Could we have avoided multiple wars in the Middle East? 1:02:00 Ask Chuck 1:02:15 Is Trump’s vilification of political opponents more extreme than other presidents? 1:11:00 Can you recommend some books on James Garfield? 1:13:15 What issues can Democrats moderate on to appeal to independent voters? 1:16:45 Why are Republicans so much better than Democrats at messaging? 1:20:00 Any organizations to help TSA agents affected by shutdown? See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Chuck Todd opens with the two stories dominating the weekend: the Iran war's cascading economic consequences and Trump's vile celebration of Robert Mueller's death. On Iran, Chuck warns that rising energy costs with oil above $100 a barrel are not politically neutral — they function as a tax on existence that directly breaches the contract Trump's own voters signed up for — and that Trump is visibly panicking about gas prices because they disproportionately hurt his base. He argues that killing the Ayatollah was never going to topple the regime because the Iranian leadership doesn't operate as rational actors who can be deterred by suffering, that Trump made the same catastrophic miscalculation Putin made in Ukraine by assuming it would be easy, and that nobody in Trump's orbit will deliver bad news because there is now a North Korea-level sycophancy around the president. He then turns to Trump's Truth Social post celebrating the death of Mueller — a Bronze Star combat veteran, 12-year FBI director, and lifelong public servant who died at 81 from Parkinson's disease — in which Trump wrote "Good, I'm glad he's dead." Chuck notes that even Fox News' Brit Hume tweeted that this is why people don't merely oppose Trump but actively hate him. He argues that character matters in politics more than any policy position, and that Trump is fundamentally incapable of showing grace or knowing when to shut up He revisits the Mueller investigation itself, arguing that the real failure wasn't the probe's legal conclusions — which confirmed Russia took action to help elect Trump and that the campaign expected to benefit from stolen information — but that there were no consequences, and that Trump's refusal to acknowledge Russian help was never about innocence but about protecting the legitimacy of his presidency, with the entire GOP going along because copping to it would have been politically fatal. Suzanne Kianpour — the Emmy-nominated journalist, Semafor columnist, and Iran specialist who joins the Chuck Toddcast for an extraordinarily personal and deeply informed conversation about what's actually happening inside Iran as the war enters its third week. Kianpour paints a picture of a country where people are terrified and staying home, where Persian New Year will not be a celebration, and where the fabric of the regime is visibly falling apart — yet there was no pre-war effort by the U.S. to organize a viable opposition, meaning the question of who replaces the regime remains dangerously unanswered. She examines whether President Pezeshkian could serve as a transitional figure, notes that the former foreign minister has gone conspicuously quiet, discusses the role of Reza Pahlavi and the women's movement, and reveals that sources inside Iran believe the new Supreme Leader, Mojtaba Khamenei, may already be dead. Kianpour delivers the stark bottom line: the regime wins simply by staying intact, and without boots on the ground or a coordinated opposition, air and naval power alone cannot finish the job. The conversation broadens into a candid assessment of the geopolitical landscape that complicates any clean resolution. Kianpour argues that the U.S. lost the moral high ground when Trump ripped up the Obama nuclear deal a deal she defends as strategically sound even if imperfect — and that Western media has become so reflexively anti-Trump that some outlets almost want the war to fail, which is inadvertently helping the Iranian regime win the information war. She notes that Gulf states were supportive when they thought the strikes would work quickly but are now distancing themselves, that China — which brokered the Iran-Saudi détente — may end up playing the key diplomatic role. Kianpour offers a striking vision of what could emerge from the ashes: a future Iran and Israel could be close allies and co-leaders of a thriving Middle East, tut she cautions that geopolitical forgiveness must be part of any post-regime transition. Finally, Chuck hops into the ToddCast Time Machine to revisit the nuclear meltdown incident at Three Mile Island and argues that it derailed a massive transition to nuclear energy that could have led to energy independence and potentially avoided multiple wars in the middle east. He also answers listeners’ questions in the “Ask Chuck” segment. Link in bio or go to https://getsoul.com & enter code TODDCAST for 30% off your first order. Take your personal data back with Incogni! Use code CHUCKTODDCAST at the link below and get 60% off an annual plan: https://incogni.com/chucktoddcast Thank you Wildgrain for sponsoring. Visit http://wildgrain.com/TODDCAST and use the code "TODDCAST" at checkout to receive $30 off your first box PLUS free Croissants for life! Timeline: (Timestamps may vary based on advertisements) 00:00 Chuck Todd’s introduction 04:15 Launching a new sports history podcast on Tuesday! 08:30 Noosphere interview with Joseph Allbriton 09:45 Providing local news services to the Washington D.C. area 11:30 Bezos didn’t live in DC, didn’t understand WaPo’s mission 12:45 The war in Iran is impacting everything. Everything else is downstream 13:15 Rising energy costs are not politically neutral, a tax on existing 14:15 Rising costs is a breach of the contract Trump voters signed up for 15:45 Iranian regime isn’t going to fight as rational actors, suffering doesn’t deter them 17:00 Killing the Ayatollah was never going to topple the regime 17:45 Nobody will give Trump bad news, he only hears what he wants to hear 19:00 There is a North Korea level of sycophancy around Trump 20:00 Trump made same mistake Putin made in Ukraine… thought it’d be easy 21:15 Trump alienated America’s allies, they want no part of his war 22:00 America is isolated and alone, but really need help from allies 23:45 Trump is finding out the hard way why other presidents didn’t hit Iran 25:15 Trump vacillates on his positions & messaging from day to day 26:15 Trump is panicking about gas prices, affects his voters the most 28:00 Trump celebrates Robert Mueller’s death in Truth Social post 29:45 The levels Trump will stoop to are truly sad 30:30 Brit Hume tweets “This is why people don’t just oppose Trump, they hate him” 31:15 Trump is incapable of ever showing grace or knowing when to shut up 32:15 Character matters in politics more than a policy position 33:15 Failure of Mueller investigation was no consequences for Russian meddling 34:30 Mueller report confirmed that Russia took action to help elect Trump 35:15 Wikileaks releases were very well curated & required American knowledge 37:30 Collusion wasn’t the crime, it was that Trump put himself above the country 39:15 Copping to Russian help would have delegitimized Trump, so GOP went along 40:30 People in Trump’s orbit were fine with Russian meddling since it helped them 41:30 Bob Mueller lived a life of public service, did not deserve Trump’s vile words 42:45 Trump’s supporters were mad about people mocking Charlie Kirk’s death 48:45 Suzanne Kianpour joins the Chuck ToddCast 50:30 What Sparked the Protests in Iran 52:15 Suzanne's background in Iran, how she became a conflict journalist 56:15 Reporting on the Iran nuclear deal 58:15 Could the Regime Have Fallen on Its Own? 1:00:45 People in Iran are afraid and are staying at home 1:02:45 Persian New Year will not be a celebration this year 1:05:15 Can the Regime Survive? What Would Change It? 1:07:15 There was no pre-war effort to organize opposition 1:10:15 Pahlavi and the Women's Movement 1:13:15 President Pazeshkian as a potential transitional figure 1:16:00 Former foreign minister has gone quiet 1:17:45 Regime wins if it stays intact 1:19:15 Was the Obama Deal naive or strategic? 1:20:45 U.S. lost moral high ground after Trump ripped up the deal 1:22:45 Western and European media is so anti-Trump that they almost want him to fail 1:25:15 The Iranian regime is winning the information war 1:28:15 Joe Kent's resignation is being framed as a "wartime defection" 1:30:00 Air and naval power alone can't guarantee safe passage in Strait of Hormuz 1:31:30 Gulf states were supportive when they thought it would work, now they're distancing 1:34:00 China's Role China brokered the Iran-Saudi détente and may play a diplomatic role 1:36:15 Social media broke the regime’s control over the Iranian public 1:38:45 The fabric of the regime is now visibly falling apart 1:41:00 Israel wanted to permanently eliminate Iran's proxy war capability post-October 7 1:43:15 A future Iran and Israel could be close allies and co-leaders of a thriving Middle East 1:46:00 Geopolitical forgiveness has to be part of any post-regime transition 1:48:30 Conflict will back into intelligence and covert operations after the kinetic phase 1:49:45 Sources inside Iran believe the new Supreme Leader may already be dead 1:53:15 Where to find Suzanne’s work 1:54:30 ToddCast Time Machine - March 28th, 1979 - Three Mile Island 1:55:30 It was the fear, not the details that defined the story of Three Mile Island 1:56:15 In the 60’s and 70’s the U.S. was rapidly building nuclear power plants 1:57:15 Operators at Three Mile Island acted logically, but warning system was flawed 1:59:30 Event happened near population center, which increased the panic 2:00:30 Jimmy Carter shown visiting site in protective gear, which shifted the psychology 2:02:45 US stopped building a nuclear future, and was dependent on foreign oil 2:03:45 Nuclear industry tried to recover in the 80s… then Chernobyl happened 2:05:15 Three Mile Island, Chernobyl and Fukushima all failed for different reasons 2:06:00 Without Three Mile Island, America’s energy system could look very different 2:08:00 Three Mile Island became a symbol of doubt in nuclear energy 2:08:45 Could we have avoided multiple wars in the Middle East? 2:09:00 Ask Chuck 2:09:15 Is Trump’s vilification of political opponents more extreme than other presidents? 2:18:00 Can you recommend some books on James Garfield? 2:20:15 What issues can Democrats moderate on to appeal to independent voters? 2:23:45 Why are Republicans so much better than Democrats at messaging? 2:27:00 Any organizations to help TSA agents affected by shutdown?See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

2. Zubrin addresses public fears by analyzing historical nuclear incidents: Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, and Fukushima. He clarifies that Three Mile Island caused no injuries, and Fukushima demonstrated reactor resilience even during a catastrophic tsunami. While acknowledging Chernobyl's specific design flaws, he argues that coal-fired plants cause far more annual deaths. Regarding nuclear waste, Zubrin asserts that safe storage methods, such as salt caverns used by the Navy, exist but are politically obstructed by activists seeking to dismantle the industry. He concludes that nuclear energy remains remarkably safe compared to conventional power. (2)1903 SANTA BARBARA

Über 18 Jahre sass Eric Nussbaumer für die Baselbieter SP im Nationalrat. Nun tritt er vorzeitig zurück. Nach seinem letzten Auftritt im Parlament ist er zu Gast bei Simone Hulliger. Energie- und Europapolitik waren die beiden Schwerpunkt-Themen von Eric Nussbaumer. Als «EU-Turbo» wurde er bezeichnet, nicht immer passte sein Kurs der Partei. Nach der Katastrophe von Fukushima profilierte sich Nussbaumer als Energiepolitiker und war einer der prägenden Figuren hinter der Energiestrategie 2050. Nun will der Bundesrat den Bau neuer AKWs wieder zulassen. Bricht sein politisches Vermächtnis zusammen? Nussbaumer spricht über Erfolge und Niederlagen, über die Bedeutung seines Glaubens in der Politik und über ein bedeutendes Telefonat mit Beat Jans.

Irán no se achanta ante los continuos ataques de Israel y de EEUU que están intentando descabezar al régimen de la república islámica. El nuevo ayatolá, Mojtada Khamenei, ha prometido represalias tras el asesinato por parte de Israel de tres de sus asesores más cercanos. Entre ellos, el veterano Ali Larijani, al que hoy miles de iraníes han rendido homenaje en un funeral celebrado en Teherán. La semana está siendo dura para Irán, que hoy ha visto como los israelíes, con la presunta connivencia de Washington, han bombardeado una instalación gasística de enorme importancia que comparte con Qatar.Estaremos en Líbano con el enviado especial Santiago Echevarría donde continua la ofensiva. Al menos 10 personas han muerto en Beirut, donde un edificio de 10 plantas cerca del centro de la capital ha sido completamente destruído por los bombardeos iraelíes.Hablaremos de la decisión de El Salvador donde la Asamblea Legislativa ha aprobado una reforma constitucional que permite la cadena perpetua de prisión para "homicidas, violadores y terroristas". Todavía tiene que ser ratificada.También de Francia porque el gobierno tiene como proyecto estrella la construcción de un nuevo portaaviones nuclear que sustituirá al Charles de Gaulle como emblema de su armada. Les vamos a contar más detalles. Vamos a estar en Japón, porque la compañía eléctrica Tokyo Electric Power Company, operadora de la accidentada central nuclear de Fukushima, ha detectado un fallo eléctrico en una planta por lo que ha vuelto a posponer su suministro comercial. Y también en Ecuador porque cuatro provincias están bajo toque de queda nocturno. El gobierno ha tomado la medida para combatir a los grupos criminales. Va a estar con nosotros Billy Navarrete, director del Comité Permanente por la Defensa de los Derechos Humanos.Escuchar audio

Your hosts are shocked to find a massive AI data center planned for their backyard. What it means for their neighbours, their grid and their planet.  Honda is facing its first annual loss in nearly 70 years after falling behind on EVs. Support The Clean Energy Show on Patreon for exciting perks including a monthly bonus podcast, early access to our content, behind the scenes looks, access to our members-only Discord community and thank-yous in the credits of videos and shoutouts on our podcast!  Main Topics Honda is was late to E.V.s then botched it an their bottom line https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/honda-shares-slide-more-than-5-automaker-faces-first-annual-loss-2026-03-13/ The U.S. may pay nearly $1 billion to cancel offshore wind projects The Lightning Round Cuba blackout affects 11 million people. U.S. EV search traffic up 20% amid oil tensions. Paris making streets near 300 schools car-free. Nuclear proximity study (post-Fukushima): home values down 4.2%. https://theconversation.com/accepter-ou-non-de-vivre-a-proximite-dune-centrale-nucleaire-une-question-loin-detre-reglee-275150 Contact Us cleanenergyshow@gmail.com or leave us an online voicemail: http://speakpipe.com/clean Support The Clean Energy Show Join the Clean Club on our Patreon Page to receive perks for supporting the podcast and our planet! Our PayPal Donate Page offers one-time or regular donations. Store Visit The Clean Energy Show Store for T-shirts, hats, and more!. Copyright 2026 Sneeze Media.

Zion Lights used to be deep inside the environmental movement: protests, arrests, road blockades, the whole thing. Then she started looking closely at the evidence around nuclear power and found that much of what she'd been told about energy, risk, and climate solutions didn't hold up. In this conversation with Michael Shermer, she explains why anti-nuclear politics has done real damage, and why reliable energy matters far beyond moral posturing. She speaks from experience about Extinction Rebellion, energy policy in Germany and France, fear around Fukushima and Chernobyl, energy poverty, overpopulation, and why modern environmentalism so often attacks the very technologies that could help both people and the planet. Zion Lights is a British science communicator, writer, author, and former environmental activist known for her pivot to advocacy of evidence-based environmental policy, particularly her support for nuclear energy as a tool for decarbonisation. She is a prominent voice in debates about climate change, energy policy, humanism, and the role of scientific reasoning in public discourse. Her new book is Energy is Life: Why Environmentalism Went Nuclear.

Die Stimmbevölkerung hat sich für die Individualbesteuerung ausgesprochen. Doch die Mitte lässt offen, ob sie an ihrer Volksinitiative festhält, die Eheleute weiterhin gemeinsam besteuern will. Fraktionspräsidentin Yvonne Bürgin nimmt Stellung zur Kritik, ihre Partei sei eine schlechte Verliererin. Das Steuer-Duell zwischen der FDP und der Mitte haben am Wochenende die Freisinnigen für sich entschieden. Mit 54% Ja-Stimmen haben die Stimmberechtigten das Bundesgesetz über die Individualbesteuerung angenommen, mit dem ein langjähriges Anliegen der FDP umgesetzt wird. Der Entscheid bringt die Mitte in eine ungemütliche Lage. Ihre Volksinitiative «Ja zu fairen Bundessteuern auch für Ehepaare» verlangt, dass die sogenannte «Heiratsstrafe» beseitigt wird. Eheleute sollen aber weiterhin gemeinsam veranlagt werden, was der Individualbesteuerung widerspricht. In der «Samstagsrundschau» erklärt die Präsidentin der Mitte-Fraktion, die Zürcher Nationalrätin Yvonne Bürgin, weshalb ihre Partei das Volksbegehren nicht sofort zurückzieht und sich damit dem Vorwurf aussetzt, das Ergebnis der Volksabstimmung nicht akzeptieren zu wollen. Zweites Thema in der Sendung ist der Entscheid des Ständerats, den Neubau von Kernkraftwerken in der Schweiz wieder ermöglichen zu wollen. Er ist dank zahlreicher Stimmen der Mitte-Partei zustande gekommen. Torpediert die Partei damit den Ausbau der erneuerbaren Energien, den die damalige Mitte-Bundesrätin Doris Leuthard nach der Nuklearkatastrophe von Fukushima vor 15 Jahren eingeleitet hat? Mitte-Fraktionspräsidentin Yvonne Bürgin stellt sich den Fragen von Philipp Burkhardt. Ergänzend zum Tagesgespräch finden Sie jeden Samstag in unserem Kanal die aktuelle Samstagsrundschau.

MJ and Jackie are back for another scoop of Second Helpings, Jackie and Natalie couldn't find a good radio station in Dallas, but Travis sure knows the (contemporary christian alt rock) hits. MJ's lookin' 2 find god or at least a choir that doesn't JUDGE. The "Desperate Housewives" watch along is bringin' up memories of the college admissions scandal with plotline that is dead on the same, Felicity Huffman's kid is gonna be in "Rooster" with Apple Paltrow, and we can all watch Steve Carrel play a daddy character who must CHANGE...again.... Jackie and MJ finally watched THE Buffy episode and you can join the Patreon to see their real-time reactions PLUS a much needed talkback that happened right after!  The new reality show "Age of Attraction" has piqued the interest of both Jackie and MJ, and then we gotta talk about the Megxit that's beginning with Netflix and Meghan Markle. Jackie's keepin' up with “House of Villains”, at least until New York gets kicked, MJ's comin' around on Rob Rausch now that “Traitors” has ended and they've spent that time learnin' more about ol' Snakeman and his Muscle Zaddy. Then it's goin' right from Birkin bags into the new Fukushima doc she just watched that she def recommends more than the other radioactive mess, “The Bride.” Ryan Gosling keeps derailing an interview about his new scifi movie "Project Hail Mary" 'cause the interviewer was trapped on the side of the road near what looked like Dr Evil's volcano lair. More people need to be talking about Matthew McConaughey's part in the interview where Timtim shoved his foot fully down his throat and how he just "yes and"ed him and Doja Cat just reveals she was just “virtue signaling” for “clicks, likes, and approval”. P!nk found out she was gettin' divorced from the tabloids, and to finish out this Second Helpings, Donna Kelce is going through a...HOME RENOVATION!! Plus even more! Want even more Page 7? Support us on Patreon! Patreon.com/Page7Podcast Subscribe to SiriusXM Podcasts+ to listen to new episodes of Page 7 ad-free.Start a free trial now on Apple Podcasts or by visiting siriusxm.com/podcastsplus. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

From a dam that killed 450 people to ghost passengers vanishing mid-ride across Japan, March 12 is darker than your morning coffee. | The Morning Weird Darkness*No AI Voices Are Used In The Narration Of This Podcast*WeirdDarkness® is a registered trademark. Copyright ©2026, Weird Darkness.EPISODE PAGE: https://WeirdDarkness.com/MWD20260312NOTE: Some of this content may have been created with assistance from AI tools, but it has been reviewed, edited, narrated, produced, and approved by Darren Marlar, creator and host of #WeirdDarkness — who, despite popular conspiracy theories, is NOT an AI voice.

Overnight, the Pentagon said it “eliminated” 16 Iranian mine-laying ships, raising further jitters about the global impact of the war in Iran. Fifteen years after a tsunami caused the Fukushima nuclear disaster, Japan is restarting reactors. And our correspondent meets Jafar Panahi, the Iranian director whose film is nominated for two Oscars this weekend.Guests and host:Rachana Shanbhogue, business and finance editorNoah Sneider, East Asia bureau chiefAndrew Miller, “Back Story” columnistRosie Blau, host of “The Intelligence”Topics covered: Iran, oil prices, Donald Trump, Strait of Hormuz, Brent crude, International Energy Agency, RussiaJapan, nuclear, Fukushima, tepcoOscars, “It Was Just An Accident”, Jafar PanahiListen to what matters most, from global politics and business to science and technology—Subscribe to Economist Podcasts+For more information about how to access Economist Podcasts+, please visit our FAQs page or watch our video explaining how to link your account. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Overnight, the Pentagon said it “eliminated” 16 Iranian mine-laying ships, raising further jitters about the global impact of the war in Iran. Fifteen years after a tsunami caused the Fukushima nuclear disaster, Japan is restarting reactors. And our correspondent meets Jafar Panahi, the Iranian director whose film is nominated for two Oscars this weekend.Guests and host:Rachana Shanbhogue, business and finance editorNoah Sneider, East Asia bureau chiefAndrew Miller, “Back Story” columnistRosie Blau, host of “The Intelligence”Topics covered: Iran, oil prices, Donald Trump, Strait of Hormuz, Brent crude, International Energy Agency, RussiaJapan, nuclear, Fukushima, tepcoOscars, “It Was Just An Accident”, Jafar PanahiListen to what matters most, from global politics and business to science and technology—Subscribe to Economist Podcasts+For more information about how to access Economist Podcasts+, please visit our FAQs page or watch our video explaining how to link your account. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Kate discusses what to watch this week including Love is Blind: Reunion (Netflix), Twisted Yoga (Apple TV+), Dynasty: The Murdochs (Netfix), Fukushima: A Nuclear Nightmare (HBO), and Top Chef (Bravo). Reality Life with Kate Casey What to Watch List: https://katecasey.substack.com Patreon: http://www.patreon.com/katecasey Twitter: https://twitter.com/katecasey Instagram: http://www.instagram.com/katecaseyca Tik Tok: https://www.tiktok.com/@itskatecasey?lang=en Facebook Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/113157919338245 Amazon List: https://www.amazon.com/shop/katecasey Like it to Know It: https://www.shopltk.com/explore/katecaseySee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

This week, Taylor, Sandy, Doug Jordan and Taddea Richard discuss a recent email from the Saudi government, 2004's hit movie The Aviator, the assassination of Ayatollah Khamenei, Jeff Daniels' obstruction, Fukushima's radioactive pig problem, Pink and Carey Hart's fracturing and much, much more! An all new edition of the popular segment Our Week's: Sight Unseen features Wuthering Heights and Psycho Killer!

There is one truth that has followed every major technological revolution in human history. Energy demand always rises to meet technological capability. When we industrialized, coal consumption exploded. When we built the modern transportation system, oil demand reshaped global geopolitics. When we entered the digital age, electricity quietly became the backbone of the global economy. And now we are entering the AI era. What most people don't appreciate is that AI is not just a software revolution. It is an electricity revolution. Training a single advanced AI model can consume as much electricity as tens of thousands of homes use in an entire year. And once trained, these models continue to run inside data centers filled with specialized hardware operating 24 hours a day. A single large AI data center can require over 1 gigawatt of power. To put that into perspective, that's enough electricity to power roughly 700,000 homes. One building consuming the equivalent of a major city. Now consider that companies like Microsoft, Google, Meta, and Amazon are planning dozens of these facilities. Suddenly, you begin to see the scale of what's happening. Even individual AI queries consume more power than traditional computing tasks meaningfully. One estimate suggests an AI query can use roughly 10 times the electricity of a traditional search query. That difference seems trivial until you multiply it by billions of interactions per day. This is why, for the first time in decades, electricity demand in the United States is accelerating again. For nearly 20 years, electricity demand was relatively flat. Efficiency gains offset economic growth. But AI, electrification of transportation, and domestic manufacturing are reversing that trend. And here's where the story becomes even more interesting. China understands this. China is building power infrastructure at a pace that is difficult to comprehend. They are adding entire national-scale power capacity every few years. In 2023 alone, China added more new coal power capacity than the rest of the world combined. At the same time, they are installing solar and wind at record rates, becoming the global leader in renewable deployment. They are not choosing one energy source. They are choosing all of them. Because they understand that energy availability determines technological leadership. Meanwhile, in the United States, building new power plants and transmission infrastructure can take a decade or more due to regulatory hurdles, permitting delays, and political resistance. This creates a very real risk. The country that can generate the most reliable, scalable energy will have a structural advantage in AI, manufacturing, and economic growth. Energy is becoming the limiting factor. And whenever something becomes a bottleneck, investment opportunities emerge. We are entering a period where trillions of dollars will be spent on power generation, grid modernization, nuclear energy, solar, battery storage, geothermal, and technologies that most people have never even heard of. Some of the biggest fortunes of the next decade will likely be tied directly or indirectly to solving this energy constraint. In today's episode, we explore alternative energy sources, the challenges we face, and the technologies that may power the future. Because understanding energy is no longer optional if you want to understand where the world is going. And as investors, those who see these shifts early have the opportunity to position themselves ahead of the crowd. Watch on YouTube: https://youtu.be/D0Lpmq0SAvo Listen on Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/548-ai-is-about-to-trigger-an-energy-crisis-most/id718416620?i=1000752299883 Listen on Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/episode/5l4674hFIJPWkz0spMq4YL Transcript Disclaimer: This transcript was generated by AI and may not be 100% accurate. If you notice any errors or corrections, please email us at phil@wealthformula.com.  Welcome everybody. This is Buck Joffery, the Wealth Formula podcast. And today, before we begin, I wanna remind you as always, there is a website associated with this podcast, wealthformula.com. That’s where you want to go. If you have, uh, an interest in uh, ing more in the community in particular, there is a, a credit investor club. AKA investor club, which you need to sign up for. Uh, go to wealthformula.com and see some private deal flow at, uh, no cost to you, uh, that, uh, you might have an interest in. Uh, let’s talk about today’s show. It’s a little bit about, uh, something. You know, that is, uh, on I think, a, a major issue, uh, going into the next decade. Um, you know, there’s one truth that’s followed. Every major technological revolution in human history. Energy demand is always rise, uh, to meet technological capability. You know, when we industrialize, uh, coal consumption exploded, obviously when we built modern transportation system oil. Demand, uh, reshaped global geopolitics. And when he entered the digital age, electricity became the backbone of the global economy, and now we’re entering the era of artificial intelligence. Now, what most people don’t appreciate is that AI is not just a software revolution, it’s an electricity revolution. Uh, training a single advanced AI model can consume as much electricity as literally tens of thousands of homes in an entire year. And once trained, these models continue to run inside data centers filled with specialized hardware operating 24 hours a day. A single large AI data center can require what’s called a entire one gigawatt of power. Now, what’s a gigawatt? Well, to put this all into perspective, that’s enough electricity to power. Roughly 700,000 homes, one building consuming the equivalent of a major city. Now, consider that companies like Microsoft, Google Meta, Amazon, they’re applying to build dozens of these facilities, and suddenly you begin to see the scale of what’s happening. Uh, even individual AI queries when you do them, they consume a lot more power than traditional computing tasks. Um, there’s an estimate that suggests that an AI query. Can use roughly 10 times the electricity of a traditional, uh, search query. The difference seems trivial until you multiply that by like billions of these interactions per day. And that is why for the first time in decades, electricity demand in the United States is accelerating again and doing so quickly. Now you might ask, well, you know, what’s been happening for the last 20 years? Well, electricity demand was actually relatively. Flat. And a lot of that is because of efficiency gains, offsetting economic growth, but ai, electrification of transportation, domestic manufacturing, they’re all gonna reverse that trend. And, and here’s where the story becomes even more interesting, because we know that China already understands this. China’s building power infrastructure at a pace that’s difficult to really even comprehend. They’re adding entire national skill, power, capacity every few years. In 2023 alone, China added more new coal power capacity than the rest of the world combined. And at the same time, they’re installing solar, wind, all these things at record rates becoming really the global leader in re renewable deployment. So you don’t think of China is that way, but they are. They’re not choosing one energy source. They’re choosing all of them. And because they understand that energy availability will determine technological leadership. Meanwhile, in the US things are kind of slower. Building a, a new power plant and transmissions infrastructure can take a decade or more. We got lots of regulatory hurdles and permitting delays in political resistance that the Chinese don’t have, and that creates a lot of risk. The country that can generate the most reliable, scalable energy, we’ll have a structural advantage in AI manufacturing and economic growth. And that is a big, big deal because energy at the end of the day is becoming. The limiting factor for growth, and whenever something becomes a bottleneck, you also get investment opportunities that emerge. So we’re entering a period where trillions of dollars will be spent on power generation, grid modernization, nuclear energy, solar battery, geothermal, you name it. And a lot of those things you’ve never heard of. Some of the biggest fortunes of the next decades will be tied directly or indirectly to solving these energy constraints. That is why in today’s episodes we’re gonna explore these alternative energy sources, kind of get an idea of what’s going on with them. I know it doesn’t sound super exciting or sexy, but understanding energy right now is, is not optional. If you wanna understand where the world is going, and as investors, those who see these shifts early are gonna have an opportunity to position themselves ahead of the crowd, and we’re gonna have. A conversation to highlight all of that right after these messages. Wealth formula banking is an ingenious concept powered by whole life insurance, but instead of acting just as a safety net, the strategy supercharges your investments. First, you create a personal financial reservoir that grows at a compounding interest rate much higher than any bank savings account. As your money accumulates, you borrow from your own. Bank to invest in other cash flowing investments. Here’s the key. Even though you’ve borrowed money at a simple interest rate, your insurance company keeps paying. You compound interest on that money even though you’ve borrowed it at result, you make money in two places at the same time. That’s why your investments get supercharged. This isn’t a new technique, it’s a refined strategy used by some of the wealthiest families in history, and it uses century old rock solid insurance companies as its back. Turbocharge your investments. Visit wealthformulabanking.com. Again, that’s wealthformulabanking.com. Welcome back to the short rewind, uh, energy demand is, uh, rising, not just from ai but from electrification. Population growth, economic activity itself. At the same time, we’re trying to transition how energy’s produced, which creates, uh, real trade-offs around cost, reliability, and scale. Today’s conversation isn’t about, uh, ideology necessarily, but it’s about the economics of energy and what’s realistic as demand continues to grow. And to help us think this through. I’m joined by Dr. Ga Hockman, professor of Environmental and Resource Economics, with the PhD from Columbia University Gall. Welcome to the show. Good morning. So let’s just start very basic here. In your view, why does economic growth almost always translate into higher energy demand? Because production is very dependent on energy. And so whenever you wanna expand production, you wanna expand food, you need more energy. And this is actually what we’re trying to decouple, to create production processes that are less energy intensive. So as we grow, as we become happier, more viable, we don’t necessarily need more energy. So, uh, setting, uh, ai, artificial intelligence aside for a second, are we already in a path where electricity demand has to rise, you know, meaningfully over the next decade? I mean, what, what kind of projections do we look at there? We need to decouple growth from energy. We didn’t do that yet. As long as we don’t do it. Uh, growth will be associated with an increase in energy demand, not as much as AI has been introducing. And that is, uh, uh, uh, jumping to a higher step. Right. Now, you’ve mentioned this a couple times in the decoupling idea how in the big picture, like how do you do that? Uh, does the low hanging fruit that the US implemented from the 1980s, 1990s, and that is energy efficiency. It, which creates a win-win. Uh, it just changed the light bulbs in your, in your house. You save electricity, but you also save money ’cause these bulbs last much longer. Assuming their cost is not high enough. Is not too high. Uh, industry is the same thing. Introducing more efficient processes. Can result endless need for energy, but we need to go a step further to make it more meaningful and to introduce production processes that simply depend less on energy or depend less on energy that is polluting. Give us another example. I mean, the light bulb is an easy one, but, um, I mean, what are some large scale ideas for that energy efficiency issue? That you’ll think about when you think about these kind of decoupling ideas. Uh, another thing, just, uh, the appliances at home, uh, you want them to, uh, be more energy efficient and the windows you put on your houses, you want it to be double blast, maybe even triple in some cases that blocks the sun and helps I, uh, isolate the house better so you don’t need to heat it as much. Insulation is very important. Uh, very similar things exist in the commercial sector. Uh, if you look at the big retail stores, they’re using a lot of light bulbs. They’re using a lot of insulation to reduce their, uh, heating costs. If they are wanting to become more energy efficient. So these are not very complicated things that can really make a change in residential, in commercial. And you can then expand it further into production process in the manufacturing. And there are different examples also there. There’s also this big driver of energy in the next couple of decades, uh, which, you know, people talk about how many more terabytes we’re gonna need just to support the artificial intelligence revolution. Do you think it’s realistic, you know, just to focus on these efficient levels? Is that enough for, for how much energy we need? No, no. And we need to expand the energy. Uh, it’s important to expand it in ways that is cleaner energy, so it does not create harm. So you don’t create a good with a bad, uh, you wanna introduce energy that is cleaner so you don’t increase, uh, pollution. Uh, impact greenhouse gases. Um, so it is also the fuel mix that you’re using. The fuel sources. Will you use solar? Will you use hydro? Will you use, uh, wind, uh, bio bioenergy, same thing. Bioenergy crops. So you wanna exp expand, you wanna. Introduce a more diverse set of feedstocks that many of them are much more, uh, cleaner than the existing one. Uh, so the movement to renewable is important. Uh, and again, you don’t need to decrease the existing infrastructure, but the new infrastructure at least needs to come from a cleaner sources. You need to improve our use of batteries. Yeah. Let, let’s break down some of the things that you’ve talked about. So, solar, okay. Um, what did, what does solar do well and where does it struggle? Solar, people forget, in 2005 it was $10. Now it’s below $1. So we need to understand that there is a transition in the transition. Many times costly, but we need to learn and bring it down that. Learning came in terms of installation. The installation became much more efficient, uh, much less costly, much faster, and that brought the price of solar down. Uh, solar has been performing very well in many places. Uh, eh, solar today is cheaper than many of the most polluting, uh, infrastructure for power in the world. If I remember correctly, the number, it’s around 500 gigawatts, which is a big number. Uh, they can, that solar can outcompete the existing, uh, energy sources. Uh, where it’s struggling is that, um. Silicon will be is is in high demand and that is a creating a floor that prevents solar from going even lower, but it can also create a constraint in the future as you expand it further. Can you explain for, for us just the silicon issue? ’cause is that. So it’s just a, a silicon is a major component and we don’t have enough, is that what you’re saying? Yes. Yes, exactly. And then doesn’t that drive up the price of silicon? Yes, but we, we didn’t hit that. We, we we’re, we’re, uh, but there are actually various entities working on alternatives. From MIT to companies, uh, that are offering interesting solutions. Yes. You mentioned storage as well. Um, energy storage. Um, how close are we to storage being really viable at scale? I mean, this is, um, you know, we certainly, battery technology has improved, but, you know, how, how, how close are we to it? Becoming something that is, is really, really helping the issues. Uh, it’s challenging ’cause right now it makes it more expensive. But if the more we use it, the more we learn, the more we understand, the more, uh, efficient and cost efficient we can introduce it. Cost will go down. So it’s like the, how do you push it forward? How do you adopt these technologies? Now, we should always remember that there are, in some places, it is already very viable. But it demands certain, uh, uh, circumstances. For example, uh, the Southwest has a location where it has, uh, underground water and solar. The solar heats the underground water. So the underground water becomes the storage that, uh, then the steam becomes the electricity in the night. And that is a very viable process. Hydro with wind goes also very well, and again, uh, they manage to store, uh, use the wind to bring water upstream, and then when there’s no wind, the water flows downstream and through hydro creates electricity. Batteries, it’s technology. Uh, will a breakthrough come one day? I believe so, but again, I, I can’t predict it. Um, we can talk about, um, you know, natural gas, right? I mean, natural gas doesn’t get much attention, uh, in the transition narrative, but how important is it today in maintaining grid stability in supporting renewables? Reliability is more important than prices to many of us. No one likes blackout and if you talk with the, those that monitor and and manage the electricity markets, that’s their top priority, not the price. Uh, we don’t like it when we don’t have electricity. We we’re very dependent on it. So reliability is definitely be, uh, uh, uh, a must before you even move towards renewables. Absolutely. Before prices even, uh, uh, for anyone in the us. Um, so NA Gas has the potential, uh, it has less. CO2. The problem with NA gas is that the infrastructure is leaking. That means that the pipeline are emitting and methane because of leaks. Uh, I believe that needs to be addressed. Uh, uh, natural gas has the potential to be used, but. You need to not use it with an infrastructure that is, uh, resulting in more damage than good. It kind of defeats the purpose of it. What would do you look at natural gas as a short term bridge or something that, you know, the, the system may rely on, you know, in, in a much longer, uh, timeframe, even with other renewables. I would be careful in creating a bridge because that this infrastructure is very expensive. Once you put the amount of money needed to create infrastructure, it’s very hard to change it. Having said that, you will have solutions that will use fossil fuels, which includes natural gas, even in the long run, simply because the cost and the benefits will add up in a way that. It won’t make any sense moving away from fossils. In my opinion, not everyone will agree with me. Yeah, but, and, and you do have technologies that can make fossil fuels much, much cleaner. Like carbon capture used in storage. Uh, that technology has a huge potential. You can recycle the hydrogen and recycle other components in the refinery process that results in a cleaner fuel. But it’s something that we need to incentivize the companies to do. Uh, a company will not do it independently ’cause it’s more costly and that’s important. How about nuclear? I mean, nuclear. Offers reliable carbon free, you know, power. Yet it hasn’t scaled the way many people expected. Um. Why is that people are afraid of nuclear. Look at the three Mile Island and, and look at Fukushima and Chernobyl for that matter. People remember those stories and that really resonates with them badly. And there’s also a problem in the accounting of nuclear. Even the most safest countries in the world like Japan will everyone considered super safe. Even they have an accounting problem. So there is the concern that. Even small amounts get leaked out to the wrong hands. That can be a very bad outcome. Eh? Having said that, there is, I don’t know. I don’t follow it too much, but I do know there is a drive to create small nuclear plants, mobile plants, eh, from my recollection for two, three years ago, the company that I heard of was very successful at that. Eh, Japan went back to nuclear different than Germany. By the way. Germany did not try to, uh, divest from nuclear. So there are some places that nuclear becomes very important. I think it’s also becomes important in some areas that work in ai. So it has been introduced as a source of electricity. Can you tell us a little bit about small modular reactors? There’s a lot of buzz about that. What, what exactly are they? I mean, how small are they? You know, safety wise, uh, they’re mobile, they’re not very big. And, uh, that makes them, uh, much more easier to manage and control as opposed to the very big nuclear plans. Nuclear is a base load. So you use it, you, once you turn it on, you don’t want to turn it off. It’s too expensive. The on and off, it takes it a long time to, to uh, ramp up. Uh, and, uh, mobile, uh, nuclear plants are addressing many of these concerns that exist with the big plants. So they are solving it in, in what I saw pretty well in some circumstances. How small are they? I mean, are they, so would you. Would a, you know, one of these AI data centers, or what would they just, would they have one small modular react or they’ll need more than that? They’ll need more than that. Oh, they need more, more than one. Yeah. Yeah, yeah. So they’re, they’re pretty small or they like, you know, the size of a car or they. How, how small are these things? No, they’re bigger than the car, but they’re not too big. If you know of a nuclear plant, the old one, you see these big round, uh, domes, uh, they’re, they’re not that big. They’re, they’re much smaller, but they’re not as small as a car. Yeah. And so you could run maybe, uh, a, an AI center with a couple of those or something like that. Is that the idea? They have, you can see some of them. There are examples in Texas where you have the, the center basically is surrounded by small units. Are they generally safer to use, and if so, why is that? Uh, I’m not a nuclear guy. I’m not a physic. I should be careful in it, but I, I, what I understood, they’re safer to use. Also, the material i, i I is not reaching, uh, levels that safer levels than you would need for, for example, for bumps and, and stuff like that. So they’re keeping everything at a safer level. When you step back and look at the whole system and think about. What’s gonna happen in the future? Do you think it’s more likely to be dominated by one energy source or like a diversified mix as we’ve been going through? I believe a diversified mix. I also believe that in some places you will always have fossil fuels. In some places you’ll have a very quick transition to renewables. Uh. Uh, we need to look at the system view. In some places it’s easier to clean the dirty fuel. In some places it’s just easier to introduce the, the clean fuel. Uh, some places I do believe you see, for example, developing world does not have the capacity to electrify. We talk about electrification and some people are very enthusiastic about it. You don’t see it in the development world. They don’t, they lack even the US And there is a study in Princeton that came, I think three years ago. Um, if you electrify the whole US today, you need to almost triple the grid capacity. Just understand what the magnitude of money that needs to be invested to get there. Is huge. Now developing countries definitely don’t have it. Even the US doesn’t have that capacity. So, uh, developing countries, I think you might see a lot more biofuels, a lot more, uh, other, uh, substitutes that exist that are easier for them to manage. And then a system view or a more complete view is needed ’cause it’s not. What is the most efficient process? Is what process fits best in a certain area, and, and that will create a lot of heterogeneity, I think. Do you have a sense in the us I mean, what, what do you think ends up being? There’s gotta probably be one, you know, dominant source that it will, will kind of come to friction based on our own. Economics in our own situation. Do you think that’s in the, in the near future? Is that solar, you think? I mean, what, what dominates in the future here? I don’t think you’ll dominate, even in the us you won’t dominate, uh uh. You have regions in the US that are very, uh, windy. Wind farms will be the optimal path. There are places that don’t have any clouds, 350 days a YA year. So solar is perfect there. Solar also creates employment and live view for certain communities so that the employment component is an important part. So you create. Income and, and, and, uh, in, in, in life, in, in economic variability in regions with the renewables, there are other regions that have, uh, a lot of supply of, uh, excess biomass or the capacity to produce a lot of biomass, and that creates them an alternative to use biomass ’cause that’s what brings them. Again, income, which is always important, but it also brings them a feedstock that might be of a, a lot of benefits. Um, and you will have regions that are heavily so heavily invested in fossils that it will never make sense to move away from fossils, but it will make sense to create cleaner fossils through carbon capture and storage in other ways. So I don’t think the US will move into one place or another. Yeah. Um, you know, you often hear discussions about, in the US about, um, our grid being outdated. Tell us sort of at, at a high level, if you wouldn’t mind explaining the issues with the grid and, you know, what, what kind of issues that brings up as we need more energy sources. Just look at the power plants. They were, look at their ages, the age of power plants. Look at and, and then there are a few that were supposed to be retired and now have been extended, but just. That by itself is sufficient to create problems whenever you encounter a natural, uh, extreme event that, uh, stresses the system. Uh, we saw with Sandy in the northeast. The northeast was, a lot of the infrastructure was outdated. Sandy came, the system collapsed. They fixed it now, so they upgraded it. There is, uh, uh. Some of the utility. Again, I’m not, I’m following anecdotal evidence and news, not beyond that, but some of the companies are striving to improve their grid and they are trying to, uh, introduce a more sustainable and reliable system again, ’cause reliability is so important. What does, what does it mean really to even update the grid? I mean, just for people who are not in this space, what does that even mean to upgrade it? You, you, you change the equipment, you upgrade the equipment, you better manage the inter, uh, interaction of trees and, and, and the electricity lines. Uh, you bring electricity lines underground. You also improve a lot of the infrastructure, uh, of the power plants and how they distribute the energy. So this whole infrastructure is being upgraded so it can support. For example, the ai. And that actually is something that the AI might bring as a very positive thing. So it will force the system to, uh, upgrade, to introduce more efficient processes, uh, distribution mechanisms that are more resilient, which I think is important. I hear we’re kind of behind when it comes to this, when you compare it to China. Can you talk a little bit about that? China has a different structure of, or economic structure. So a lot of the, uh, driver, the driver in China is the government and money that the government allocates to these alternative technologies, and that creates a very strong drive for renewables. Eh, China is also a big driver in coal in China, so. It’s basically where the government decides to put the money, and that’s where you see the industry flourish. If you look at the numbers, the investment numbers, China outpaces any country in the world in terms of the value invested per year in the recent years, and, and they’re producing a lot more, a lot more energy than us too. Isn’t that correct? I mean, I, I’ve just been, just in terms of following the AI news, I keep hearing about it. China has no. So many more terabytes than us, uh, of energy, uh, ability. Is is that true? Uh, that I don’t know. I don’t know exactly ’cause, uh, I know they’re producing a lot. I know they are expanding a lot, and I know that in the solar space, for example, they dominate because of that. They’re already, they’re also starting to dominate in the electric vehicle space. Uh, they’re becoming to leaders in those areas. Yes. Um, big picture, I think if you wanted to sort of sum up some of the, you know, major issues that you think that, you know, people like us who are. Investors or you know, just people wanna know what’s happening in the future. Like what, what’s, what’s the message for, for people? I would, I would try to make my house more efficient. I would try to, uh, and it’s important to understand this is not only about, it is about greenhouse gases, but it’s also about if your house is more efficient, you are also paying less money. And that has a lot of benefits to it. Similar logic can follow to the industries and how they work, how, and, and conserving energy is not necessarily coming at the cost of being more or less productive. That’s what we need to understand. You can conserve energy and still produce more. You can become more efficient and you can still, and you can reduce your dependencies on, uh, energy, which I think is important. Dr. Ga Hoffman, thank you so much for being on Wealth Formula Podcast today. Thank you for inviting me. You make a lot of money but are still worried about retirement. Maybe you didn’t start earning until your thirties. Now you’re trying to catch up. Meanwhile, you’ve got a mortgage private school to pay for, and you feel like you’re getting further and further behind. A good news. If you need to catch up on retirement, check out a program put off by some of the oldest and most prestigious life insurance companies in the world. It’s called Wealth Accelerator, and it can help you amplify your returns quickly, protect your. And money from creditors and provide financial protection to your family if something happens to you. The concepts here are used by some of the wealthiest families in the world, and there’s no reason why they can’t be used by you. Check it out for yourself by going to wealthformulabanking.com. Welcome back to the show everyone. Hope you enjoyed it. And, uh, yeah, again, you know, the goal of this show is really to give you, you know, a, a macro look at what’s going on in the world and one of the things that is. Clearly an issue for the United States is energy production. And so, um, you know, stay on top of this stuff. This is, you know, this is where the puck is headed, right? Um, ai, all these things that are, are really, uh, driving the next decade of growth. Really depend on it. Anyway, that is it for me. This week on Wealth Formula Podcast. This is Buck Joffrey signing off. If you wanna learn more, you can now get free access to our in-depth personal finance course featuring industry leaders like Tom Wheel Wright and Ken McElroy. Visit wealthformularoadmap.com.

Nuclear fuel is nothing like the coal or gas it replaces. Where fossil fuels are destroyed in combustion, nuclear fuel must survive years of continuous fission inside a reactor and come out the other end looking almost exactly as it went in. In this episode, fuel engineer Michael Seely breaks down how uranium dioxide pellets are made, why the fuel rod is one of the most sophisticated manufactured objects in the world, and how an industry that once ran more than half its fleet on leaking fuel pins methodically engineered its way to near-zero failure rates by 2010.We also get into enrichment economics, the bespoke nature of reactor fuel design, the post-Fukushima push toward accident-tolerant and higher-burnup LEU Plus fuel, and why high-assay low-enriched uranium (HALEU), the feedstock required by most advanced reactor concepts, requires 40 kilograms of natural uranium and six times the separative work of conventional fuel just to produce a single kilogram. If you want to understand why nuclear plants are built the way they are, why the water cooled reactor won, and what the fuel supply chain challenge really means for the advanced reactor industry, this is the episode to start with.Listen to Decouple on:• Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/6PNr3ml8nEQotWWavE9kQz• Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/decouple/id1516526694?uo=4• Overcast: https://overcast.fm/itunes1516526694/decouple• Pocket Casts: https://pca.st/ehbfrn44• RSS: https://anchor.fm/s/23775178/podcast/rssWebsite: https://www.decouple.media

Nuclear power could save the planet — so why are we terrified of it? Here, Rad Future author Isabelle Boemeke breaks down the science behind the stigma.Full show notes and resources can be found here: jordanharbinger.com/1277What We Discuss with Isabelle Boemeke:Nuclear energy is the cleanest major power source available — producing no greenhouse gas emissions or particulate matter during electricity generation — yet public perception remains trapped in Cold War-era fears and Hollywood disaster imagery rather than modern scientific reality.The math on safety is staggering: fossil fuels cause roughly four million premature deaths annually from air pollution, while even the most generous estimates attribute around 4,000 deaths to history's worst nuclear accident at Chernobyl — meaning you'd need 200 Chernobyls every year for nuclear to match fossil fuel fatalities.Nuclear fuel is approximately one million times more energy dense than coal — a gummy bear-sized pellet of uranium contains the same energy as 2,000 pounds of coal — which translates to dramatically less mining, less land use, and a lifetime of personal energy consumption producing only a soda can's worth of spent fuel.Germany's post-Fukushima decision to phase out nuclear power backfired spectacularly, leaving the country dependent on Russian gas (effectively funding the Ukraine war), while China's critiques of Fukushima's tritium release were pure theater — their own nuclear plants routinely emit more tritiated water during normal operations.The infrastructure for a nuclear transition already exists — coal plants share nearly identical turbine and cooling systems with nuclear facilities, meaning workers can be retrained and sites repurposed, creating jobs in communities devastated by fossil fuel shutdowns while building genuine energy independence.And much more...And if you're still game to support us, please leave a review here — even one sentence helps! Sign up for Six-Minute Networking — our free networking and relationship development mini course — at jordanharbinger.com/course!Subscribe to our once-a-week Wee Bit Wiser newsletter today and start filling your Wednesdays with wisdom!Do you even Reddit, bro? Join us at r/JordanHarbinger!This Episode Is Brought To You By Our Fine Sponsors: BetterHelp: 10% off first month: betterhelp.com/jordanFitbod: 25% off: fitbod.me/jordanHexClad: 10% off: hexclad.com/jordanProgressive: Free online quote: progressive.comHomes.com: Find your home: homes.comSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.