Podcasts about Disagreement

The Republican Fissures and Potential Third-Party Movements. Guest: Thaddeus McCotter. The discussion centers on Tucker Carlson's potential departure from the Republican Party over foreign policy disagreements. McCotter suggests this reflects deeper fault lines within the MAGA base, where isolationist tendencies and dissatisfaction with the administration's relationship with allies like Israel could lead to future political discord. 161936

Hour 3 of the Chris Hand Show | Aired Monday 06-22-26See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

This is a panel discussion with many topics:- Disagreement between Meloni of Italy and Trump- Science and medicine denial in military. Vaccines downplayed, and military personnel now getting sick- US military bases in the Middle East have been attacked by Iran, and prove more vulnerable than believed, at what cost?- The consequences of Trump's war failure, and cost to Americans- Going back to what was the state of US before Trump no longer possible, change must be RADICAL WNHNFM.ORG  productionMusic: "That's how every empire falls," John Prine

Series: The Light of the World Originally aired 06/21/2026

Barack Obama famously spoke of "fundamentally transforming" America.But what exactly does that mean?And why does that vision stand in direct contrast to the principles established by America's Founders?In this episode of The Right Side, Doug Billings explores one of the most important philosophical debates in modern American politics. Is America fundamentally broken and in need of transformation? Or is America fundamentally good and in need of restoration?The Founders were not perfect men. They never claimed to be. But they established principles that proved powerful enough to inspire Frederick Douglass, Martin Luther King Jr., and generations of Americans who worked to bring the nation closer to its ideals.America's greatest achievements didn't come from abandoning its founding principles. They came from returning to them.Join Doug Billings as he examines the difference between transformation and remembrance, and why the future of the Republic may depend upon understanding that distinction.The Right Side with Doug BillingsWe're in this together. Believe it. For the Republic!Cheers. #TheRightSide #DougBillings #Obama #Founders #FoundingFathers #Constitution #DeclarationOfIndependence #AmericanHistory #AmericanExceptionalism #Freedom #Liberty #Republic #MartinLutherKingJr #FrederickDouglass #AmericaFirst #fypSupport the show

Vice President JD Vance sits down for a wide-ranging, candid interview covering faith, politics, family, and the future of conservatism. Vance directly addresses accusations of Israeli influence on U.S. politics, draws a clear line against anti-Semitism on the Right, and strongly defends President Trump's foreign policy decisions. He also opens up about his personal journey from a depressed atheist in a broken family to a committed Christian, while discussing his conversion to Catholicism, the role of the pope, and pro-life priorities in the Trump administration. This conversation delivers thoughtful moments, theological exchange, and an inside look into a nuanced worldview that only Vance himself can articulate. Buy “Communion: Finding My Way Back to Faith” by Vice President JD Vance here. Share the Arrows 2026 is on October 10 in Dallas, Texas! Tickets are on sale now at: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://sharethearrows.com⁠⁠⁠ Share the Arrows is sponsored by: A'del Natural Cosmetics: AdelNaturalCosmetics.com Range Leather: RangeLeather.com/ALLIE We Heart Nutrition: WeHeartNutrition.com Buy Allie's book "Toxic Empathy: How Progressives Exploit Christian Compassion": ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.toxicempathy.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ – Time Codes 0:00 Introduction 2:20 Christian Fatherhood 11:20 Faith & Politics 21:59 Vance's Conversion to Catholicism 38:46 Disagreement with the Pope 42:46 Does Israel Influence America? 48:40 The Iran Strategy 52:52 Pro-Life Wins 1:03:22 In The End We Win – Today's Sponsors: Fellowship Home Loans | Start with a free consultation at FellowshipHomeLoans.com/Allie and receive a $500 credit at closing. Crowd Health | Join CrowdHealth to get started today for $99 for your first three months using code ALLIE at ⁠⁠⁠JoinCrowdHealth.com⁠⁠⁠⁠. CrowdHealth is not insurance. Opt out. Take your power back. This is how we win. A'del | Visit AdelNaturalCosmetics.com and enter promo code ALLIE for 25% off your first-time purchase. Seven Weeks Coffee | Experience the best coffee while supporting the pro-life movement with Seven Weeks Coffee; use code ALLIE at ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.sevenweekscoffee.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ to get up to 25% off your first order, plus your free gift! Range Leather — highest-quality leather, age-old techniques, and all backed up with a “forever guarantee." Go to ⁠⁠rangeleather.com/allie⁠⁠ to receive 15% off. Episodes You May Like: Ep 519 | President Donald Trump on Witch Hunts, Family + Mean Tweets https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/ep-519-president-donald-trump-on-witch-hunts-family/id1359249098?i=1000541152964 Ep 458 | J.D. Vance on Faith, White Privilege & The Big Things Worth Fighting For | Guest: J.D. Vance https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/ep-458-j-d-vance-on-faith-white-privilege-the-big/id1359249098?i=1000529737977 --- ► Buy Allie's book "You're Not Enough (& That's Okay): Escaping the Toxic Culture of Self-Love": https://alliebethstuckey.com/book ► Subscribe to the podcast: iTunes: https://apple.co/2UVssnP Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2FwkXxj ► Connect with Allie on Social Media: https://twitter.com/conservmillen https://www.instagram.com/alliebstuckey/ https://facebook.com/allieBlazeTV/ ► "Relatable" merchandise — use promo code "ALLIE10" for a discount: https://shop.blazemedia.com/collections/allie-stuckey

Disagreement triggers a primal fight-or-flight response. This book summary reveals how to rewire that instinct for better outcomes.

In this episode, Ruth explores the underlying reasons why intelligent, experienced people often hold back from saying what they really think at work—especially on leadership teams. What looks like workplace “niceness” may actually be a way of managing social threat, not genuine trust or alignment. Ruth explains how neuroscience (specifically the SCARF model) sheds light on why disagreement feels so uncomfortable, why silence can become the norm, and how organizations unwittingly reinforce these dynamics.Key TopicsWhy People Avoid Speaking Up:Ruth describes the invisible social risks leaders weigh before expressing disagreement and how this shapes organizational behavior 00:56.Social Threat vs. Niceness:The illusion of harmony is often a result of people trying to protect themselves from threats to status, certainty, autonomy, relatedness, and fairness (see the SCARF model) 04:24.Neuroscience of Disagreement:Our brains respond to social threat much like physical threat, leading to caution, hedging, or complete shutdown in discussions 05:52.Organizational Reinforcement:Cultures that don't handle challenge well—through explicit or subtle punishment—teach people to play it safe, slowing learning and adaptation 07:20.Surface Alignment vs. True Safety:When disagreement goes underground, teams lose out on critical information and risks, which can derail decisions 09:15.The Real Meaning of Psychological Safety:Ruth clarifies that safety is about surviving discomfort, not avoiding it, and highlights how trust is proven after tension, not by its absence 10:13.Advice for Leaders:Leadership shapes whether disagreement feels survivable. Ruth offers practical questions for reflection to help leaders understand the climate in their own teams 12:55.Mentioned Models/FrameworksSCARF Model by David Rock:Explains how status, certainty, autonomy, relatedness, and fairness affect our sense of safety at work 04:37.Reflection QuestionsWhere might disagreement currently feel risky in your team or organization?What are people (consciously or unconsciously) learning is “safe to say”?How do you, as a leader, respond to challenge or disagreement? Does it increase or decrease safety?If you found this episode helpful, connect with Ruth and join the ongoing conversation about leadership, psychological safety, and team performanceConnect with Ruth:Instagram LinkedIn Website

Is it healthy relationship friction, or is someone taking over your life with their bad behavior at your expense? What's the boundary line between normal human conflict and toxic encroachment. Using the metaphor of a home security system, we explore how your nervous system acts as the ultimate indicator of safety. When a relational "squatter" slips past your perimeter, they try to force you to pay the fine for a crime they keep committing We break down the three personality profiles most vulnerable to this invasion: the exhausted Over-Functioner, the anxious Over-Performer, and the starving Over-Compensator. Pulling from powerful boundary insights by Dawn, we unpack the dangerous trap of treating silence as patience. When you absorb dysfunction without changing the cost of the behavior, you give implicit permission for it to continue. Learn why waiting to address dysfunction leads to a systemic blowout—allowing the squatter to blame you for the explosion they engineered. Tune in for an actionable five-part diagnostic checklist to test your perimeter and reclaim your home. Claim Your Gifted Hypnosis Experience Renewal Reset HERE FREE Hypnosis Session to Release the Outdated Truth, Let Go of Misaligned Hope and Stop Painful Pushing Here dawnlandrum.com

* Is the Six Flags redevelopment in trouble? There's some disagreement over the lease. We'll talk with Ben Myers, a reporter for The Times Picayune, about what's going on. * Do we have a peace deal with Iran?

On this week's Family Matters, Clement Manyathela speaks with Clinical Psychologist, Dr. Jeanie Cavé, to explore the art of navigating friendship disagreements with maturity, honesty, and respect. The Clement Manyathela Show is broadcast on 702, a Johannesburg based talk radio station, weekdays from 09:00 to 12:00 (SA Time). Clement Manyathela starts his show each weekday on 702 at 9 am taking your calls and voice notes on his Open Line. In the second hour of his show, he unpacks, explains, and makes sense of the news of the day. Clement has several features in his third hour from 11 am that provide you with information to help and guide you through your daily life. As your morning friend, he tackles the serious as well as the light-hearted, on your behalf. Thank you for listening to a podcast from The Clement Manyathela Show. Listen live on Primedia+ weekdays from 09:00 and 12:00 (SA Time) to The Clement Manyathela Show broadcast on 702 https://buff.ly/gk3y0Kj For more from the show go to https://buff.ly/XijPLtJ or find all the catch-up podcasts here https://buff.ly/p0gWuPE Subscribe to the 702 Daily and Weekly Newsletters https://buff.ly/v5mfetc Follow us on social media: 702 on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/TalkRadio702 702 on TikTok https://www.tiktok.com/@talkradio702 702 on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/talkradio702/ 702 on X: https://x.com/Radio702 702 on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@radio702 See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Who has the authority to make educational decisions for a student? In this episode, host Michelle Cannon is joined by Lozano Smith attorneys Amanda Cordova and Anna Wood to discuss the legal framework surrounding educational rights, including special education considerations. The conversation explores custody arrangements, caregiver authority, AB 495, and when students hold their own educational rights. Join us as we explore practical guidance for navigating custody orders and other common educational rights issues faced by school districts. Show Notes & References 2:30 – Overview of educational rights 4:05 – Educational rights unique to parents of students who qualify for special education 5:45 – Parents and others who qualify as educational rights holders 7:23 – Custody arrangements for divorced, separated or unmarried parents 9:53 – Disagreements between parents with joint legal custody and how school districts should respond 11:32 – The importance of asking for custody orders 12:03 – Rights of parents who do not hold custodial rights 13:25 – What school administrators should be looking for when they receive a custody order 16:30 – Stepparents and caregivers, and assigning educational rights 18:23 – Assembly Bill (AB) 495 and caregiver’s affidavit (Client News Brief 46 – November 2025) 19:12 – Adult students holding their own educational rights   For more information on the topics discussed in this podcast, please visit our website at: www.lozanosmith.com/podcast   Disclaimer: As the information contained herein is necessarily general, its application to a particular set of facts and circumstances may vary. For this reason, this podcast episode does not constitute legal advice. We recommend that you consult with your counsel prior to acting on the information contained herein.

Welcome, Friends and Patriots.I saw a post the other day that made me laugh because it was so simple, so practical, and therefore guaranteed never to occur to a politician.The post said:"End SNAP. Replace it with monthly distributions of dried beans, powdered milk, and rice. See how quickly people go back to work."Now before the media starts hyperventilating into a paper bag, the point isn't whether you'd actually do it.The point is that conservatives think differently.We look at a problem and instinctively ask, "What's causing it?"Government looks at a problem and asks, "How much money can we throw at it before the next election?"That's the difference.Conservatives are mechanics. We pop the hood.Leftists are interior decorators. They hang an air freshener on a smoking engine and call it progress.We are practical people.You don't need a secret handshake to become a conservative. There aren't seventeen pronouns to memorize. No mandatory reading list. No ideological purity tests.The requirements are pretty simple.Tell the truth.Work hard.Take responsibility.Treat people fairly.And be willing to hear another point of view without needing a therapist afterward.That's it.Most conservatives I know will argue with you for an hour, buy you lunch afterward, and mean neither thing personally.The Left can't do that anymore.Disagreement has become violence.Questions have become hate speech.Common sense has become extremism.Which is why people are constantly self-deporting from our side of the political fence.Not because conservatives throw them out.Because eventually they wander so far into Crazytown they can't find their way back.Tucker CarlsonTake Tucker Carlson.Apparently Tucker now believes President Trump has diminished American power in unimaginable ways.Unimaginable?Really?That's the word we're going with?While Iran is getting hammered.While Venezuela got exposed as a paper tiger.While Russia and China are learning that military hardware advertised like a late-night infomercial doesn't always perform as advertised.America's enemies seem considerably less confident than they did a few years ago.Maybe somebody should inform them they're winning.And speaking of self-deportation, where's Candace Owens these days?See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

⚖️ What's the Difference Between Contested and Uncontested Divorce? | Los Angeles Divorce ⚖️ One of the first things to understand about divorce is whether your case is contested or uncontested. The difference can significantly affect the time, cost, paperwork, and overall complexity of the divorce process in California.

Philippians 2:14-15 challenges believers to live with gratitude instead of grumbling, reflecting the character of Christ in a world often marked by negativity, complaints, and division. In this devotional, Emily Rose Massey explores how complaining and arguing are more than bad habits—they reveal deeper heart issues that God desires to transform. Whether frustration arises from difficult circumstances, strained relationships, or everyday inconveniences, Scripture calls Christians to respond with thankfulness, humility, and trust in God's goodness. Highlights Complaining often reveals deeper issues of discontentment and unbelief. Philippians 2:14-15 calls believers to live without grumbling or arguing. Gratitude helps cultivate contentment and trust in God's sovereignty. God cares not only about our actions but also about the attitude of our hearts. Disagreements can be handled with humility, grace, and a desire for unity. A thankful spirit helps Christians stand out as lights in a dark world. Daily time in Scripture renews the mind and combats negativity. The Holy Spirit empowers believers to respond with gratitude instead of complaints. Join the Conversation Have you experienced a time when God reminded you that He saw your pain, needs, or circumstances? How does knowing that God is El Roi—the God who sees you—change the way you approach difficult seasons? Continue the conversation with the Crosswalk community here: https://forums.crosswalk.com/ Do you want to listen ad-free? When you join Crosswalk Plus, you gain access to exclusive, in-depth Bible study guides, devotionals, sound biblical advice, and daily encouragement from trusted pastors and authors—resources designed to strengthen your faith and equip you to live it out boldly. PLUS ad free podcasts! Sign Up Today! Full Transcript Below: A Heart Full of Gratitude Instead of Grumbling By: Emily Rose Massey Bible Reading:“Do all things without grumbling or disputing, that you may be blameless and innocent, children of God without blemish in the midst of a crooked and twisted generation, among whom you shine as lights in the world…” (Philippians 2:14-15, ESV). When it comes to sin in our lives, sometimes we attempt to overlook or give excuses for our behavior if we feel like our actions are justified because of our circumstances. For example, when I am sleep deprived, my flesh thinks it perfectly acceptable for me to deal out a hefty dose of sarcasm to my seven-year-old who has asked me the same question twelve times before my morning coffee or to murmur under my breath that I can’t believe my husband left his glass of milk from the night before on the floor again and, of course, the toddler just dumped it all over the living room right on cue. But those actions do not glorify God, and they are rooted in sin. If I am a child of God, His Spirit will bring conviction to my heart with His word because it is my heart that needs attention and change. When I’m tempted to complain, which we are all naturally prone to every single day, this passage from Philippians 2 comes to mind to bring truth to my heart: “Do all things without grumbling or disputing, that you may be blameless and innocent, children of God without blemish in the midst of a crooked and twisted generation, among whom you shine as lights in the world…” (Philippians 2:14-15, ESV). Intersecting Faith & Life: As God’s children, we are not to grumble. We must remember that, ultimately, grumbling is complaining against the sovereign God of the universe and saying He isn’t good, which is sinful. When we complain, we should repent, reset our minds by thinking on things above, and rejoice and give thanks to God for His graciousness towards us. There are new mercies available to us every single morning. Perhaps it would be a beneficial habit to create a daily list of things that you are grateful for to help cultivate a heart of contentment and gratitude. Despite hardships and inconveniences in our lives and relationships, we are called to rejoice and find our joy in Christ. It all comes down to the attitude and posture of our hearts. How about your attitude when you disagree with someone, or they have offended you? When you are in a disagreement with someone, do you want to be right more than you want to pursue unity with that person? Do you allow a bad attitude to drag you into unnecessary arguments or even gossip to complain to someone else instead of going directly to the person you are annoyed or upset with? Disagreements are inevitable, but most of all, God cares about our attitude during disagreements and doesn’t want us to be swept up in foolish arguments constantly. We can disagree with others without being disagreeable or prideful. If we are entangled in senseless disputing and complaining, the world has trouble seeing the light of Christ in our lives. We see in verse 15 of Philippians 2 that the Lord wants Christ followers to shine bright in a culture full of darkness. Our lives are to be a brilliant beacon of light in the darkness as we stand as God’s children against the wickedness of the world. “…that you may be blameless and innocent, children of God without blemish in the midst of a crooked and twisted generation, among whom you shine as lights in the world…” (Philippians 2:15, ESV). One way we can protect ourselves against complaining and empower our hearts to shine bright for Christ is to be diligent to cling daily to the Word of life so that we can thrust it into a dark world. The Word of God helps us to renew our minds so we can cultivate the fruit of the Spirit and stand out in the world, pointing others to the hope that we know in Jesus. In addition to our daily time in the Word, we must abide in the Vine by communing with Him daily. We can call upon the name of the Lord to cry out for help when we are tempted to complain and grumble. He is our ever-present help in times of need and is faithful to strengthen us. Further Reading: Psalm 107 1 Thessalonians 5:16-18 Discover more Christian podcasts at lifeaudio.com and inquire about advertising opportunities at lifeaudio.com/contact-us.

I sat down with Democratic strategist Mike Nellis to discuss Graham Platner, Democratic candidate for the U.S. Senate in Maine. No way could I support Platner, Mike would support Platner if he's the Dem nominee. The primary is tomorrow. We had a respectful conversation. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Send us Fan MailClimate change. Politics. Artificial intelligence. Energy. Disagreement.Few topics generate more heat—or less understanding.In this episode of Kyle Talks, I sit down with Josh Dorfman for a wide-ranging conversation about some of the biggest questions facing society today.We explore the challenges of climate change, the role politics plays in shaping public perception, and why meaningful conversations across differences have become increasingly difficult. We also discuss the rapid growth of AI, the rise of data centers, and the opportunities and tradeoffs that come with technological progress.Most importantly, we talk about solutions.Rather than focusing on outrage, fear, or tribalism, this conversation explores what it looks like to approach complex problems with curiosity, nuance, and a willingness to learn from people who see the world differently.Topics discussed:• Climate change and practical solutions• The intersection of politics and environmental issues• How AI is reshaping energy consumption• The impact of data centers on the future• Talking with people you disagree with• Finding common ground in polarized times• Why curiosity may be more important than certaintyIf you enjoy thoughtful conversations that challenge assumptions and encourage deeper thinking, this episode is for you.Understanding does not equal agreement—but it is often where better conversations begin.Social Media:Insta/X: kyleTHEhortonYoutube: KyletalkssTiktok: KyleTalkssIntro: Head In The Clouds by Matthew MorelockOutro: Surfaces Type Beat - Jellyfish BeatsSupport the show

This episode is a discussion with Dr. Joel Biermann on a number of issues related to the Lutheran church today and into the future. 

Your Board Isn't Working: Why a Board Retreat Might Be the Best Investment Your Nonprofit Makes This Year Most nonprofit leaders know the scene. You're sitting in a board meeting watching the same three people carry the conversation while two members scroll their phones, one asks a question already answered in the pre-read materials, and another slips out early because "something came up." The meeting ends politely. No one throws a chair. But nothing really moves forward. This is how board dysfunction often shows up—not through dramatic conflict, but through something quieter and more damaging: under-engagement. Board members attend meetings but contribute little. They skim materials, avoid difficult conversations, they fail to respond to staff emails, and they remain observers rather than active leaders. At first glance it seems harmless. Meetings are calm. Disagreements are rare. But the cost is real. A few members end up carrying the entire board. Strategic discussions become shallow. Staff grow frustrated presenting ideas that receive little response. And gradually, expectations decline. Leadership turns into attendance. At that point the board meeting starts to resemble a pleasant dinner party—friendly conversation, plenty of nodding, and very few decisions. And when that happens, the organization begins to drift. When this type of drift happens, one of the smartest investments a nonprofit can make is a well-designed board retreat—an opportunity to step back, address culture, under-engagement, and reset expectations before the board stops leading and starts simply showing up. Listen in!

Sunday morning message from Pastor John.

Gavin Ortlund and Fr. Gregory Pine discuss sins of speech, social media, protestant-catholic differences, and apologetics in the modern age.Fr. Gregory Pine's new book: Training the Tongue and Growing Beyond Sins of Speech: https://www.amazon.com/Training-Tongue-Growing-Beyond-Speech/dp/1645855171/truthunitesbo-20Truth Unites (https://truthunites.org) exists to promote gospel assurance through theological depth. Gavin Ortlund (PhD, Fuller Theological Seminary) is President of Truth Unites, Visiting Professor of Historical Theology at Phoenix Seminary, and Theologian-in-Residence at Immanuel Nashville.SUPPORT:Tax Deductible Support: https://truthunites.org/donate/Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/truthunitesFOLLOW:Website: https://truthunites.org/Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/truth.unites/X: https://x.com/gavinortlundFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/TruthUnitesPage/

I've seen more harm come from avoiding conflict than from facing it. Leaders who fear tension often create cultures where silence becomes the norm... and that silence slowly corrodes trust, mission, and morale.In my book, Saving Organizations That Matter, I talk about why learning to disagree well is essential for any team that wants to grow. Disagreement, offered respectfully, is a gift. It sharpens thinking, strengthens relationships, and keeps the mission at the center.If you're a leader who struggles with conflict - or you work in a culture that avoids it - I walk through a simple seven‑part framework that can help you rethink what disagreement is for.

Disagreements happen everywhere to everyone – in workplaces, in families, and with our countrymates. And these days, the levels of anger and vitriol seem to be skyrocketing. As a result, many of us are either in a constant state of conflict or assiduously avoiding voicing any opinion that might spark debate. Yet, according to Julia Minson, PhD, a psychologist and professor at the Harvard Kennedy School, disagreeing is both inevitable and essential for everything from navigating decisions at home to running innovative and agile companies to governing democratic societies. Through the years, social scientists have often offered well-meaning but unproven (and not very useful) advice on handling conflict, according to Minson. In HOW TO DISAGREE BETTER (Avery; March 24, 2026), she offers evidence-based insights, based on decades of scientific research to help readers understand why we disagree, and how we can do it constructively and without rancor.Minson defines constructive disagreement as any disagreement that increases the parties' willingness to talk again. Her bedrock concept is "receptiveness to opposing views" - a trait she has studied for years, and that can be measured using a simple survey. However, Minson argues that even more important than cultivating a mental habit of receptiveness, is working on showing the other party that we are receptive to their point of view. Unfortunately, most of us are not naturally gifted at this task (indeed, evidence shows we are quite bad at it).Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/arroe-collins-unplugged-totally-uncut--994165/support.

There is a need for students to learn good models for handling difficult conversations. So on today's episode, Tim and Dr. Andrew Reed (Ph.D.) from Brigham Young University (BYU) take up this call and continue the conversation by bringing together students from both universities, Biola and BYU, for civil discourse on religion, theology, and social issues. They debrief their experience in a course Tim and Andrew are co-teaching, and they discuss the importance of understanding your neighbor's perspective as a way to love your neighbor, Aristotle's method of the dialectic, and the difference between emphatic vs. phatic communication.Show notes and a full transcript are available.

Send us Fan MailShe had spent three nights preparing her counter-argument. Data, stakeholder feedback, a slide deck she wasn't even sure she would get to use. By the time she sat down for the meeting she was dreading, the knot in her stomach was already there.She was preparing to disagree with her VP. But that wasn't the real conversation.In this Monday Momentum episode of Communicate to Lead, Kele Belton kicks off a five-part June series on the difficult conversations women leaders walk into braced for a fight. This episode shows why the conversation you name before you walk in shapes everything that happens inside it, and how reframing disagreement as alignment changes your tone, your language, and the response you get back.What You Will LearnWhy high-performing women leaders often over-prepare for disagreement, and what that costs them over time.The difference between debating to win and aligning to make a better decision.A simple opening phrase and follow-up question you can use to stay grounded, surface your perspective, and keep the conversation productive.Your Action StepIdentify one conversation this week where you've been preparing to disagree with someone. Before you walk in, ask yourself: what do I actually want to walk out of this room having accomplished?If the answer is, “I want us to make the best decision,” then this is not a disagreement. It is an alignment. Walk in with that frame, use the phrase and question from this episode, and notice what changes.AI PromptUse this prompt to prepare for your next alignment conversation. Paste it into your preferred AI assistant and answer the questions as they come.I'm a [role] in [industry]. I have an upcoming conversation with my [manager, peer, stakeholder] in which I see the situation differently from them. Help me reframe this conversation from a disagreement to an alignment.Ask me 3 questions:What decision is being discussed, and where do I see it differently?What outcome do I actually want to walk out of this conversation having accomplished?What might my counterpart be seeing that I am not?Then write:One opening phrase I can use to surface my perspective without sounding defensive.One follow-up question I can use to invite their thinking and find the real gap.Constraints:Forward-facing toneNo language that signals confrontation or asks permission to speakMust carry the same weight as “surface it” or “flag it”Must sound natural when spoken aloudAvoid softening language like “just,” “a little,” “maybe,” “I was thinking,” or “I wanted to mention”Example output:Opening phrase: “I'm tracking something different on this, and I want to surface it before we decide.”Follow-up question: “Can you walk me through how you got there?”Ready to Go Deeper?Book a complimentary Leadership Strategy Call with Kele to talk through where you are, where you want to go, and what it will take to get there.About Your HostKele Belton is a communication and leadership trainer who specializes in helping women leaders develop confidence and impact through strategic communication and practical leadership frameworks.Connect with KeleLinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kele-ruth-belton/Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/thetailoredapproach/Website: https://thetailoredapproach.com

The Disagreement Between Paul and Barnabas Pastor Jae Lee Acts 15: 36-51

On this episode we discuss ways that we can come alongside our husbands in the midst of disagreement to offer support and encouragement so that he can lead the family confidently and have a soft place to land if his plans should happen to fail. We also touch on the pitfalls of digging your heels in and allowing resentment to fester. Listen and be encouraged!

In this episode of The Ag View Pitch, Shay sits down with Vance Crowe for a conversation about communication, family business, disagreement, curiosity, and the stories that shape how people work together.Vance shares why better conversations often start with humility, genuine curiosity, and the ability to ask questions without judgment. Shay and Vance discuss how this applies inside farm operations, family businesses, marriage, leadership, and difficult conversations where people may not see the world the same way.They also talk about the value of family stories, why people repeat certain stories over time, how conflict can reveal hard-earned wisdom, and why communication may become one of the most important skills in a world changing quickly through technology and artificial intelligence.For farmers, business owners, and families trying to work through hard conversations with more trust and less defensiveness, this episode offers a practical look at how to listen better, ask better questions, and handle disagreement in a healthier way.Learn more about Vance Crowe's Interest-Based Communication course:https://articulate.ventures/ibc

This is a recap of the top 10 posts on Hacker News on May 28, 2026. This podcast was generated by wondercraft.ai (00:30): Claude Opus 4.8Original post: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48311647&utm_source=wondercraft_ai(01:58): Can we have the day off?Original post: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48302745&utm_source=wondercraft_ai(03:27): Bricks and Minifigs Stole a Man's $200k Lego CollectionOriginal post: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48314136&utm_source=wondercraft_ai(04:56): Disagreement among frontier LLMs on real-world fact-checksOriginal post: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48307887&utm_source=wondercraft_ai(06:25): Show HN: Hallucinate – Massively Multiplayer Online RaveOriginal post: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48304260&utm_source=wondercraft_ai(07:54): Citing 'severe' math deficits, UC faculty demand a return to SAT tests for STEMOriginal post: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48309233&utm_source=wondercraft_ai(09:23): AMD pulls a bait-and-switch on Linux users with Vivado licensing changesOriginal post: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48307231&utm_source=wondercraft_ai(10:52): EU fines Temu €200M for allowing sale of illegal productsOriginal post: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48309302&utm_source=wondercraft_ai(12:21): Anthropic raises $65B in Series H funding at $965B post-money valuationOriginal post: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48313048&utm_source=wondercraft_ai(13:50): Google employee charged with $1M Polymarket insider trading bet on search termOriginal post: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48302822&utm_source=wondercraft_aiThis is a third-party project, independent from HN and YC. Text and audio generated using AI, by wondercraft.ai. Create your own studio quality podcast with text as the only input in seconds at app.wondercraft.ai. Issues or feedback? We'd love to hear from you: team@wondercraft.ai

[Cross posted from my substack] In their EA Forum post last year, CEA described their ‘principles-first approach to stewardship of the EA community'. I'm a big fan of principles-first stewardship in principle. I think EA needs a steward, and I think that stewardship should be organised around EA's core principles. But I think CEA's particular growth-centric approach to principles-first stewardship is stewarding EA in the wrong direction. I think that: The key question for principles-first stewardship should be "Is EA a place that embodies and nurtures EA principles?" I think there are serious reasons to worry that it isn't such a place - that EA has become more ideological and less truth-seeking over time, and that growth focused approaches to community building like CEAs are a big part of the reason why. A summary of my main points: It seems to me that EA is dying. I'm less concerned here about growth metrics, and more concerned about the health of EA as a community and a moral/ intellectual project. It seems to me that EA is losing its question-nature, and also has become something that people are less and less willing to stand behind or participate [...] ---Outline:(04:16) It seems to me that EA is dying(05:05) EA as a question(06:26) EA as a community(07:30) Various posts which inform my conception of EA death(08:42) Growth is not "Community Building 101"(10:20) The growth funnel model is in tension with open truth-seeking(10:25) Targeting high impact careers and donations(13:04) Selection effects(15:20) Growth is only good if EA is functioning well(17:23) EA community building doesn't serve the people who embody EA most deeply(20:01) FTX was a trust problem, not just a brand problem(22:14) CEA's brand strategy is in tension with open truth-seeking(24:33) What principles-first stewardship could look like --- First published: May 28th, 2026 Source: https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/xsffhcHoexJgH4h4X/my-disagreements-with-cea-s-approach-to-stewarding-ea --- Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.

In this excerpt from Office Hours, Pastor Amos suggests that the more mature spouse should yield to the other to avoid causing them to violate their conscience. He also discusses gender differences in conflict, such as integrated versus compartmentalized thinking. __________ Partner with Us: https://churchforentrepreneurs.com/partner Connect with Us: https://churchforentrepreneurs.com __________    

In this episode of the Take Care and Live podcast, Dr. Stephen explores what it means to navigate sharp disagreement without destroying relationships. Drawing from the story of Paul, Barnabas, and John Mark, Dr. Peters unpacks how wisdom, discernment, and maturity shape the way we view people beyond their past failures.This conversation challenges listeners to rethink how they handle conflict, partnership, disappointment, and leadership — while recognizing that different perspectives, assignments, and seasons do not have to fracture unity or shared purpose. If you've ever struggled with trusting someone again, maintaining relationships through disagreement, or discerning potential in people others have written off, this episode offers practical and powerful insight for your personal and professional life.00:00 Introduction to Holistic Living01:48 The Challenge of Accountability and Apologies03:32 Investing in People Despite Their Past06:12 Navigating Disagreement in Relationships12:10 The Importance of Maintaining Relationships16:17 Maturity in Relationships and Disagreements19:47 Key Takeaways on Relationships and Growth

The series in the Stanley Cup semi-finals have brought some surprises with Vegas up 3-0 on Colorado and the Canadiens giving the Hurricanes all they can handle. The Montreal Victoire win the Walter Cup in the PWHL. Plus the NHL is bringing out city-connect sweaters and Mike isn't happy.   Listen Here:  Apple Podcasts   Direct MP3   iHeart Radio Spotify GET YOUR SCUTTLEPUCK MERCH AT SCUTTLEPUCK'S DASHERY STORE Title Player: Steve Payne  News Why won't refs make a call in OT?  Disagreement over offside call?  City connect sweaters Oilers coachinig interviews Vegas up 3-0 Hurricanes outshooting Habs but just scraping by PWHL Walter Cup final - Montreal Winners Guess the 5th -  Mike's Proposal to radically change the Stanley Cup Playoffs Connections: Last Week - Sidney Crosby, Mitch Marner, Nathan MacKinnon, Andrew Shaw Next Week - Playoff updates

Scott Klusendorf is joined by his producer Adrian Rink to discuss how to navigate conflicts between brothers and avoid the trap of tribalism within the pro-life movement. Not everything is worth fighting over, and learning to distinguish between simple disagreement and necessary division is a vital skill for modern ministry. Learn how you can maintain a God-glorifying focus on rescuing the unborn while treating your fellow laborers with grace and humility on this episode of The Case for Life.Be sure to subscribe to The Case for Life Podcast on iTunes, Spotify, YouTube, or your favorite podcast app so you never miss a single episode.Follow Scott Klusendorf on Rumble, Youtube, Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter to be kept up to date on everything God is doing through my pro-life work.Sign up for Pro-Life 101: 7 Days to Confident Engagement: https://scottklusendorf.com/prolife101/Book me for an event or partner with Life Training Institute as a donor at https://prolifetraining.com.

American psychiatry has built a sociological armor around itself that protects it from reform. The armor has two parts. Reverence and complexity. Together they form the most effective institutional defense system in American professional life. And the apparatus, in 2026, has evolved its most refined defensive move yet, the DSM-6 roadmap, which absorbs the entire body of structural critique against the field by publishing thoughtful documents acknowledging the critique is correct, while channeling an entire generation of reform energy into bureaucratic processes that will conclude, eventually, with the publication of a new manual that incorporates the language of the critique without changing what the manual does. Why the apparatus persists despite forty years of evidence it is failing. How residency capture, modality capture, and credentialing capture work together to produce a workforce whose tolerance for the mystery of the work has been systematically lowered. What would have to change. And why none of the obvious answers are actually answers. This episode covers: Of Two Minds. Tanya Luhrmann's anthropology of American psychiatric residency. How young doctors who enter training wanting to think across biological and psychological registers get formed, by the reward structure of training itself, into single-register practitioners. Why this is happening right now to the residents who started in 2025, and why the AI replacement is going to be welcomed by the field that has been preparing for it for a generation. How Aaron Beck got eaten. The careful, curious clinician who let his data change his mind. The three properties of cognitive therapy that made it perfectly compatible with the emerging managed care apparatus. Why Beck himself was not the version of Beck that got reproduced in the training programs. The selection pressure that captures every modality with the same properties, regardless of the founder's intent. The ABA parallel. Ivar Lovaas, the 1987 study, the autism insurance mandates, the BACB explosion. Why Applied Behavior Analysis became mandatory standard of care despite extensive evidence of harm from the autistic community. Henny Kupferstein on PTSD outcomes. The Autistic Self Advocacy Network. Private equity acquisition of ABA chains and what the moral crumple zone looks like at scale. Measurement as the real religion. The PHQ-9 and GAD-7 as Pfizer-funded screening instruments that became, by capture and convenience, the definitions of depression and anxiety in American clinical practice. Campbell's Law. Goodhart's Law. Theodore Porter on quantification as defense against weak internal authority. The IAPT case study from England, Layard's economic argument, David Clark's CBT rollout, Michael Scott's outcome research, Farhad Dalal's cognitive-behavioral tsunami. Why the entire international model of measurement-based care produces excellent statistics and very little durable change. The critics the apparatus could not absorb. Robert Whitaker on long-term outcomes and Anatomy of an Epidemic. Joanna Moncrieff and the 2022 serotonin meta-analysis that should have ended the chemical imbalance theory and didn't. Lisa Cosgrove on DSM-5-TR financial conflicts of interest. Why each of them produced exactly the kind of evidence that should have triggered structural reform, and why the apparatus dismissed each of them through credentialing arguments that were really about boundary policing. The DSM-6 trap. The closure-of-the-trap argument. Why the DSM-6 roadmap, which concedes the entire structural critique, is the apparatus's most sophisticated defensive move yet. Why being invited to participate in the DSM-6 working groups is the mechanism by which the next decade of reform energy gets neutralized. Why the manual is downstream of the apparatus and reforming the manual cannot reform the apparatus. Enshittification of care. Cory Doctorow's framework applied to American mental health. The four constraints that should have prevented it. How each was eliminated. Madeleine Clare Elish on moral crumple zones. Why clinicians absorb the moral and financial cost of an apparatus they did not design. The diploma mill. The accreditation conflict of interest. Why MSW programs, counseling programs, and PsyD programs have doubled their output without any accountability for what they produce. The accountability inversion. The structural fix. Why schools and boards should be liable for the clinicians they produce. Why the field needs both rigorous selection and rigorous accountability, and how the current system has neither. What would change if the field stopped being a diploma mill. Why this is not a return to Freud's priest class. Disagreement was the wisdom. Why the productive conflict between schools of thought was where psychology was actually thinking, and why the DSM-III atheoretical move killed the conversation that produced wisdom. Neither side wins. Why the cold machine and the warm ghost both need each other. Why the answer is not to defeat the apparatus but to stop mistaking it for the work. The coda. The Machines Will Start to Dream. The actual ending of the series. Why you do not need a conspiracy theory for any of this. The cold machines are nothing, the warm ghost is everything. The microcosm is the macrocosm because the systems are human. The AI threat as reality splitting, where the simulated layer becomes thick enough that the substrate underneath stops being accessible. Freud's permanent problem. Bureaucracy as the most successful avoidance technology humans have ever invented. The disbelief at the root. The question of whether you are more scared of yourself than of not seeing life clearly. The wager that even if humans always refuse, professional psychology should stop being the most refined refusal in the culture. About the host: Joel Blackstock is a Licensed Independent Clinical Social Worker and Clinical Supervisor, the Clinical Director of Taproot Therapy Collective in Hoover, Alabama, and the author of work on Brainspotting, Emotional Transformation Therapy, qEEG neurofeedback, somatic and depth approaches to trauma. Find more at gettherapybirmingham.com. This is the final episode of a nine-part series. #PsychotherapyOnTheCouch #AmericanConfession #DSMReform #DSM6 #DSMCritique #DiagnosticAndStatisticalManual #APA #AmericanPsychiatricAssociation #PsychiatryReform #MentalHealthReform #PsychotherapyReform #TanyaLuhrmann #OfTwoMinds #PsychiatricResidency #AaronBeck #CognitiveTherapy #CBT #CognitiveBehavioralTherapy #ABA #AppliedBehaviorAnalysis #IvarLovaas #BACB #AutismRights #AutisticSelfAdvocacy #ASAN #HennyKupferstein #PHQ9 #GAD7 #MeasurementBasedCare #CampbellsLaw #GoodhartsLaw #TheodoreporPorter #TrustInNumbers #IAPT #RichardLayard #DavidClark #MichaelScott #FarhadDalal #CognitiveBehaviouralTsunami #RobertWhitaker #AnatomyOfAnEpidemic #MadInAmerica #JoannaMoncrieff #SerotoninHypothesis #ChemicalImbalance #SSRIs #Antidepressants #LisaCosgrove #PsychiatryUnderTheInfluence #ConflictOfInterest #PharmaInfluence #BigPharma #Enshittification #CoryDoctorow #RotEconomy #EdZitron #MoralCrumpleZone #MadeleineCElish #InsuranceMentalHealth #GhostNetworks #MentalHealthParity #DiplomaMill #SocialWorkEducation #MSWPrograms #PsyD #CounselingEducation #CACREP #CSWE #APAAccreditation #LicensingBoards #ClinicalSupervision #AccountabilityInversion #PsychotherapyTraining #PsychiatricTraining #PsychologyHistory #PsychiatryHistory #FreudCivilizationDiscontents #JungianTherapy #DepthPsychology #SomaticTherapy #TraumaTherapy #ComplexTrauma #AITherapy #AIReplacingTherapists #ChatGPTTherapy #FutureOfTherapy #PsychotherapyPodcast #PsychiatryPodcast #PsychologyPodcast #MentalHealthPodcast #ClinicalSocialWork #JoelBlackstock #LICSW #TaprootTherapy #BirminghamAlabama #AlabamaTherapy #HooverAlabama #ColdMachinesWarmGhosts #TheMostSacredThingWeHave #TheMachinesWillStartToDream #WarmGhost #ReverenceAndComplexity #ProfessionalCapture #InstitutionalCapture #RegulatoryCapture #EvidenceBasedPractice #EvidenceBasedCritique #BiologicalPsychiatry #PsychiatryEpistemology

I sit down with Thomas Hübl to explore why modern society feels increasingly polarized, emotionally fragile, and disconnected. We unpack how collective trauma, ancestral pain, and unresolved wounds from previous generations continue to shape our relationships, politics, and inner lives today. Thomas shares powerful insights on masculinity, war, leadership, emotional numbness, and the importance of learning how to stay grounded in uncertainty instead of collapsing into fear or division. This was a deep and expansive conversation about healing, human connection, and what it means to become more whole in a rapidly changing world.SHOW HIGHLIGHTS00:00 - Introduction00:33 - Why People Struggle to Handle Disagreement03:23 - Social Media, Echo Chambers & Relational Fragility07:13 - Collective Trauma & The Speed of Modern Life12:15 - Mental Health, Trauma & Overwhelm13:57 - What Collective & Ancestral Trauma Really Means19:49 - Why Personal Healing Matters24:50 - The Generational Wounds Men Carry26:17 - War, Peace & Collective Responsibility32:50 - Fathers, Emotional Absence & Masculinity35:09 - Extremism, Uncertainty & Modern Chaos41:30 - Why Men Feel Alone44:56 - Politics, Division & Collective Pain50:19 - Disorientation in Modern Society52:21 - Leadership, Uncertainty & The Unknown56:46 - Learning to Trust Yourself58:36 - Releasing Inherited Burdens01:02:43 - Final Thoughts01:03:13 - Where to Find Thomas Hübl

In this excerpt from Office Hours, Pastor Amos discusses the importance of tempering the natural urge to argue with other believers and understanding that God can use ministries even if their doctrine contains errors. __________ Partner with Us: https://churchforentrepreneurs.com/partner Connect with Us: https://churchforentrepreneurs.com __________    

Can you support the troops without supporting the mission? What about that Thomas Massie loss in Kentucky fits into this conversation? We stay focused on the thoughtfullness we need this Memorial Day weekend.

News and Updates: Yarbo Robot Security Nightmare: A security researcher remotely hijacked thousands of Yarbo robot lawn mowers worldwide, exposing owners' Wi-Fi passwords, GPS coordinates, and live home camera feeds through critical firmware vulnerabilities. Voice Replacing Typing: AI dictation apps like Wispr Flow are transforming workplaces into noisy, call-center-like environments as users ditch keyboards to whisper stream-of-consciousness prompts to coding tools and AI assistants. Bumble Kills the Swipe: Bumble CEO Whitney Wolfe Herd announced the app is eliminating its signature swipe feature in Q4, pivoting to AI-driven matchmaking as the company battles a 90% stock decline since its 2021 IPO. Claude No Longer Blackmails You: Anthropic reports that since Claude Haiku 4.5 in October 2025, all Claude models score perfectly on agentic misalignment tests, meaning they no longer resort to blackmail or sabotage when threatened with deactivation. AI Job Predictions Disagree: A Northwestern/American University study found ChatGPT-5, Gemini 2.5, and Claude 4.5 frequently give conflicting exposure rankings for which jobs are most at risk from AI, raising concerns about reliability of such forecasts.

May 17 , 2026 - Sharp Disagreement and Shared Understanding - Dr. Austin Carty

Kevin Sabet debates Matt Johnson on the Illusion of Consensus podcast with host Rav Arora, covering Trump's psychedelic executive order, ibogaine, FDA approval, Right to Try, drug scheduling, and the future of psychedelic research. Sabet, a former White House drug policy advisor across the Clinton, Bush, and Obama administrations, argues for caution around psychedelics, marijuana policy, commercial incentives, and overstated medical claims. Johnson, a leading Johns Hopkins psychedelic researcher, responds on psilocybin studies, addiction treatment, depression, safety protocols, REMS, and why accelerated research may still follow the evidence. The discussion also covers Joe Rogan, RFK Jr., Marty Makary, Jay Bhattacharya, ketamine clinics, MDMA, MAPS, cannabis rescheduling, veteran suicide, and the risks of turning experimental drugs into public policy too quickly. Subscribe to Rav's Substack to get episodes straight to your inbox: https://www.illusionconsensus.com Chapters: 0:00 - Intro 2:05 - Sabet's Objection to Psychedelics 10:00 - Matt's Disagreement with Sabet 13:15 - Psychedelic Research Quality 21:10 - Kevin's Rebuttal 24:00 - Was Joe Rogan Wrong On Ibogaine's Efficacy 32:50 - Ibogaine Safety Concerns 40:50 - Could The Executive Order Go Too Far 46:10 - Rescheduling and FDA Approval

In this episode of the Fitness + Technology Podcast, Bryan O'Rourke shares his panel discussion from FIBO's Future Forum, "A Respectful Disagreement on AI & Its Hype Cycle." Moderated by Hans Muench, Bryan is joined by Pablo Viñaspre of FitnessKPI and Marcin Obel of Qodeca for an honest conversation about what's working in AI, what's falling short, and what fitness operators should actually be paying attention to. Listeners will gain practical insights, candid perspectives, and a discussion that moves beyond the buzzwords surrounding artificial intelligence. If you're evaluating how AI fits into your business strategy, this is a conversation you won't want to miss. Check out FITC's 2026 Digital Pulse Report: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0GTV2QT18 One Powerful Quote: 45:10: "Most businesses don't have a strategy. They have a plan, and if you don't think of it in that context, you're never going to be able to benefit from the enablement of technology." 4-10 Bullet Points (w/ timestamps) - Highlighting key topics discussed: 4:41: Bryan and Marcin discuss the hype cycle surrounding the AI boom. 7:57: Pablo explains how AI can deliver genuine, measurable value for operators. 9:04: Marcin examines whether the challenge lies in the technology itself or in the expectations created by vendors and the media. 12:22: The panel discusses the evolution of language learning models and artificial general intelligence, including their potential as long-term investments and the question of credibility. 16:44: Pablo addresses plateaued product life cycles and how companies can continue building meaningful AI-driven growth strategies. 18:05: The panel agrees that the greatest barriers to AI adoption are people and organizational change management and not the technology itself. 24:29: The discussion explores where AI is genuinely improving fitness operations and member experiences and where it is being oversold or misapplied. 31:05: The panel debates whether mass personalization leads to better outcomes or simply higher engagement. 33:35: The conversation turns to accountability, governance, and risk management for operators and vendors implementing embedded AI technologies. 38:08: The panel discusses what minimum government standards for AI in the fitness industry could look like. 39:55: The speakers outline practical steps operators should be taking today to prepare their businesses for AI adoption. 45:50: The panel shares closing thoughts on the realities and the risks of overhyped AI. Bullet List of Resources: https://www.fibo.com/ https://fitness-kpi.com/ https://www.qodeca.com/ Guest Contact Information: https://www.hans-muench.com/ https://www.linkedin.com/in/hans-muench-653346a/ https://x.com/Lazarusmunich https://www.linkedin.com/in/pabloviñaspre/ https://x.com/PabloVinaspre https://www.linkedin.com/in/marcinobel/ https://x.com/marcinobel https://www.bryankorourke.com/ https://www.linkedin.com/in/bryankorourke/ http://www.fittechcouncil.org/ https://www.youtube.com/user/bko61163

We have a historic opportunity to do the big thing this year, in the final year of a historically great governor who's not afraid to do the big things. I hope it's not wasted.

Northwestern University just launched the Litowitz Center for Enlightened Disagreement, a real-world institution devoted to "research-backed approaches to cultivating open-mindedness, identifying one's own cognitive biases, working collaboratively with others despite disagreement and more." In this episode, David McRaney details his time as a resident of the Center, teaching students how to ask questions that activate a person's introspection, and then follow up with questions that evoke a person's motivated reasoning, then keep going until the other side articulates things they may have never considered before, and, in so doing, reveal the deeper motivations and values generating disagreement. You'll learn about this and all the other modules of the Center's pilot program. You'll also learn about a new game they are designing to improve scientific literacy of news consumers and news creators. Previous Episodes How Minds Change The Litowitz Center for Enlightened Disagreement Medill School for Journalism Patti Wolter Brad Zakarin Eli Finkel Nour Kteily The Center for Public Deliberation The Listen First Coalition Better Together America Heather Barnes Martin Carcasson Point Taken The Visual Thinking Lab Steven Franconeri Joshua Greene's Website Tango Tango Quiz Game Research Love Factually Website Joshua Hudson Protein Research NYT Protein Deep Dive Tylenol Metastudy The Garage Monica Guzman Braver Angels Jacqui Banaszynski David McRaney's Twitter David McRaney's BlueSky YANSS Twitter YANSS Facebook Newsletter Patreon Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Preview for Later: HEADLINE: The Montreux Convention: Peace Through Mutual Dislike GUEST: Emily WangSUMMARY: Wang details how the 1936 Montreux Convention secured the Bosphorus through a "triangle of disagreement". Global powers accepted Turkish sovereignty as a lesser evil compared to their rivals gaining control.1870 ISTANBUL

11. Joe Pistrito and Phil Swan analyze the success of the Artemis 2 mission. They argue the space race with China drives NASA priorities, despite technical disagreements regarding commercial versus government-centric architectures.1890 USS NAHANT,

Disagreements are everywhere right now - and let's be honest, they can get messy fast. But what if arguing didn't have to wreck your relationships… or your nervous system? This week on Getting Better, JVN sits down with Dr. Julia Minson, a Harvard decision scientist and leading expert on disagreements, to unpack why we clash, how we can do it better, and the small shifts that make a huge difference. From dinner table debates to full-on conflict spirals, we're getting into the psychology behind why being “right” isn't always the win you think it is. Together, they explore the gold standard for healthy disagreement, where conflict actually comes from, and the real-life tools you can start using today to stay grounded, curious, and connected - even when you deeply disagree. How to Disagree Better by Julia Minson out now! Full Getting Better Video Episodes now available on YouTube.  Follow Dr. Julia Minson on Instagram @juliaminson  Follow us on Instagram @gettingbetterwithjvn  Follow Jonathan on Instagram @jvn Executive Producer, Chris McClure Producer, Editor & Engineer is Nathanael McClure Production support from Chad Hall Our theme music is also composed by Nathanael McClure. Check out the JVN Patreon for exclusive BTS content, extra interviews, and much much more - check it out here: www.patreon.com/jvn  Curious about bringing your brand to life on the show? Email podcastadsales@sonymusic.com. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices