Podcasts about privacy paradox

La Francia introduce una nuova legge obbligando Pornhub, Youporn, Xvideos e altri siti per adulti a verificare rigorosamente l'età degli utenti tramite documenti ufficiali o video-selfie.La normativa entrerà pienamente in vigore nei prossimi mesi e Arcom, l'autorità francese, minaccia il blocco totale delle piattaforme che non rispetteranno le nuove regole.Questo solleva quesiti cruciali: come tutelare realmente i minorenni senza compromettere irrimediabilmente la privacy e l'anonimato degli utenti? Creare un database centralizzato per la verifica dell'età potrebbe portare con sé enormi rischi di data leak e violazioni della privacy, lasciando informazioni sensibili in mano a governi e grandi aziende.Si tratta dell'eterno Privacy Paradox: difendere i minori dalle minacce online senza eliminare uno dei principi fondanti di Internet, l'anonimato e la riservatezza dell'identità personale.È giusto sacrificare l'anonimato online per tutelare i minori, oppure rischiamo di perdere per sempre la libertà digitale?~~~~~ INGAGGI E SPONSORSHIP ~~~~~ Per contatti commerciali: sales@matteoflora.comPer consulenze legali: info@42LawFirm.it~~~~~ SOSTIENI IL CANALE! ~~~~~Con la Membership PRO puoi supportare il Canale » https://link.mgpf.it/proSe vuoi qui la mia attrezzatura » https://mgpf.it/attrezzatura~~~~~ SEGUIMI ANCHE ONLINE CON LE NOTIFICHE! ~~~~~» CANALE WHATSAPP » https://link.mgpf.it/wa» CANALE TELEGRAM » https://mgpf.it/tg» CORSO (Gratis) IN FUTURO » https://mgpf.it/nl» NEWSLETTER » https://mgpf.it/nl~~~~~ CIAO INTERNET E MATTEO FLORA ~~~~~ Questo è “Ciao Internet!” la prima e più seguita trasmissione di TECH POLICY in lingua italiana, online su YouTube e in Podcast.Io sono MATTEO FLORA e sono:» Professore in Fondamenti di Sicurezza delle AI e delle SuperIntelligenze (ESE)» Professore ac in Corporate Reputation e Crisis Management (Pavia).Sono un Imprenditore Seriale del digitale e ho fondato:» The Fool » https://thefool.it - La società italiana leader di Customer Insight» The Magician » https://themagician.agency - Atelier di Advocacy e Gestione della Crisi» 42 Law Firm » https://42lf.it - Lo Studio Legale per la Trasformazione Digitale » ...e tante altre qui: https://matteoflora.com/#aziendeSono Future Leader (IVLP) del Dipartimento di Stato USA sotto Amministrazione Obama nel programma “Combating Cybercrime (2012)”.Sono Presidente di PermessoNegato, l'associazione italiana che si occupa di Pornografia Non- Consensuale e Revenge Porn.Conduco in TV “Intelligenze Artificiali” su Mediaset/TgCom.

Marketing often involves navigating a very thin line between privacy and personalization. Can we have our privacy and still enjoy those personalized, serendipitous experiences too?  In this episode of Data Dialogues, we are joined by data experts Michelle Taves and Kristin Jones to discuss the "Privacy Paradox.” We explore the contrasting reality, which is that we all want brands to be protecting our personal information while the allure of tailored recommendations (and earning freebies and rewards) is undeniable. Now, let's discover why 73% of adults feel they lack control over how their data is used along with the ways marketers can create unique experiences without crossing the line…

Is observing people in a public space from the privacy of your home an infringement of their rights? Can the widespread use of CCTV cameras be justified, or does it violate their privacy? And how do technological developments affect the delicate balance between safety and privacy? [00:00] Introduction [00:18] The Case of Mrs. A [02:06] Privacy and Public Surveillance [08:28] The Networking Effect [11:18] Tracking and Rights Violations [13:48] Real-Life Implications [14:18] Challenging the First Premise [22:56] Networking and Privacy Concerns [30:08] The Hidden Dangers of Private Spaces [32:13] The Right to Privacy Debate [35:18] The Superhuman Surveillance Argument [48:04] The Role of Intent in Surveillance [54:20] Balancing Privacy and Security [01:00:29] Concluding Thoughts on Surveillance

Apple's Privacy Paradox, Broadcom's VMware Shakeup, FBI's Encryption Advocacy, and Tesla Cybertruck Fail In today's Hashtag Trending, host Jim Love dives into Apple's privacy paradox and its potential impact on workplace privacy. We examine Broadcom's aggressive pricing strategy for VMware, its implications, and customer reactions. The FBI and CISA now advocate for encryption, warning against cross-platform messaging vulnerabilities. Finally, we explore a Tesla Cybertruck's failure in harsh Canadian weather, raising questions about EVs' cold-weather readiness. Join us for these pressing tech updates! 00:00 Introduction and Overview 00:26 Apple's Privacy Paradox 02:37 Broadcom's VMware Pricing Strategy 05:01 FBI's New Stance on Encryption 07:26 Tesla Cybertruck's Cold Weather Woes 09:18 Conclusion and Sign Off

You set up an assumption, you have a theory, you analyze your data, and you show that the assumption does not hold. Doing good qualitative research is that simple. Except that it's not, of course. On the ground, in the research and writing process, these basic rules can be quite tricky to implement. So we discuss some heuristics researchers can use to limit their conversants, settle on suitable theoretical lenses to examine their data, and collecting more data than what they thought was necessary.   References Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation Of Cultures. Basic Books. Goodall, J. (1986). The Chimpanzees of Gombe: Patterns of Behavior. Harvard University Press. Popper, K. R. (1959). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Basic Books. Durkheim, E. (1895). The Rules of Sociological Method. Free Press. Giddens, A. (1976). New Rules of Sociological Method. Hutchinson. Barley, S. R. (1986). Technology as an Occasion for Structuring: Evidence from Observations of CT Scanners and the Social Order of Radiology Departments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(1), 78-108. Kellogg, K. C. (2022). Local Adaptation Without Work Intensification: Experimentalist Governance of Digital Technology for Mutually Beneficial Role Reconfiguration in Organizations. Organization Science, 33(2), 571-599. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.1445 Mertens, W., Recker, J., Kummer, T.-F., Kohlborn, T., & Viaene, S. (2016). Constructive Deviance as a Driver for Performance in Retail. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 30, 193-203. Markus, M. L. (1983). Power, Politics, and MIS Implementation. Communications of the ACM, 26(6), 430-444. Berente, N., Lyytinen, K., Yoo, Y., & King, J. L. (2016). Routines as Shock Absorbers During Organizational Transformation: Integration, Control, and NASA's Enterprise Information System. Organization Science, 27(3), 551-572. Alashoor, T., Keil, M., Smith, H. J., & McConnell, A. R. (2023). Too Tired and in Too Good of a Mood to Worry about Privacy: Explaining the Privacy Paradox through the Lens of Effort Level in Information Processing. Information Systems Research, 34(4), 1415-1436. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (4th ed.). Sage. Berente, N., Recker, J., & Leonardi, P. (2023). . This IS Research podcast, 13 September 2023. Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research: Notes on the Gioia Methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15-31. Lebovitz, S., Levina, N., & Lifshitz-Assaf, H. (2021). Is AI Ground Truth Really “True”? The Dangers of Training and Evaluating AI Tools Based on Experts' Know-What. MIS Quarterly, 45(3), 1501-1525. Ryle, G. (1949). The Concept of Mind. University of Chicago Press. Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691-711. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis (2nd ed.). Sage. Cramton, C. D., & Hinds, P. J. (2014). An Embedded Model of Cultural Adaptation in Global Teams. Organization Science, 25(4), 1056-1081. 

This podcast episode explores various tech-related topics, including the limitations of CarPlay devices, Apple's privacy policies, and the challenges of finding a lost iPhone. The hosts discuss their experiences with a CarPlay after-market device, Tesla's lack of CarPlay support, and the impact of privacy prompts on user experience. They also provide tips for finding a lost device and discuss alternative password managers.

Do our children see themselves as having a spy in their pocket when we use tech to see their location? Are they right? PJ talks to Mary McCarthy about how kids now might see themselves as living in the panopticon Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Andrew Mayne and Justin Robert Young dissect Apple’s approach to integrating AI into its ecosystem with a strong emphasis on privacy. They speculate on the implications of Apple’s strategy to handle AI processing on-device as much as possible, while also offering cloud processing with user permission. The trio discusses the technical hurdles, Apple’s historical stance […]

Is observing people in a public space from the privacy of your home an infringement of their rights? Can the widespread use of CCTV cameras be justified, or does it violate their privacy? And how do technological developments affect the delicate balance between safety and privacy?

In this Sidebar episode, we explore what draws AI researchers to the work that they do. Amii Fellow Bailey Kacsmar talks with Amii's Director of Scientific Operations Adam White about her research into human-centred privacy, why it's more important than ever to think about how we protect data in AI and what the paradox privacy is. Production Credits: Lynda Vang - Producer, Chris Onciul - Video Production, Jen Tomski - Social Media Music Credits: Main Theme - Brooklyn Bridge by Lunareh

In 2018, the Supreme Court created a revolution in the Fourth Amendment. In Carpenter v. United States, the Court found that the government needed a warrant to obtain data about the cell phone towers to which a person connected when using their phone. That data can reveal the digital breadcrumbs of a person's life – including where they went and how long they stayed. But cell phone users give that location data to their phone providers, third-party companies like AT&T and Verizon. Those companies don't have the legal ability to challenge a government's request for the user's data. In fact, the companies often can't even notify the user about a request for information. This creates a paradox. Cell phone users, the people who have a Fourth Amendment right to challenge the government's request for information, don't know the government is requesting it and third-party companies know about the request but can't challenge it in court. The third-party paradox has massive implications for privacy rights and raises important questions about how to challenge the government's request for information that might be protected by the Fourth Amendment. Joining the show to discuss the third-party paradox and the Fourth Amendment is Michael Dreeben. Michael argued Carpenter and over 100 other cases before the Supreme Court on behalf of the government. He is now a partner at the law firm O'Melveny & Myers, a Distinguished Lecturer from Government at Georgetown University Law Center, and a Lecturer on Law at Harvard Law School. Show Notes: Michael DreebenParas Shah (@pshah518) Resolving Carpenter's Third-Party Paradox (Part I and Part II) Just Security's Fourth Amendment coverageMusic: “The Parade” by “Hey Pluto!” from Uppbeat: https://uppbeat.io/t/hey-pluto/the-parade (License code: 36B6ODD7Y6ODZ3BX)Music: “The Clock is Ticking” by Simon Folwar from Uppbeat: https://uppbeat.io/t/simon-folwar/the-clock-is-ticking (License code: FY1TG2G1ESDYMSHF)

Are you tired of feeling helpless and exposed when using IoT devices? Have you been told to simply 'be careful' without any real solutions? In this episode, we get our ears on some expert insights and practical solutions to help you take control of your privacy. From understanding the risks and vulnerabilities to mastering cybersecurity challenges and envisioning a safer future - this episode is a must-listen for every privacy-conscious individual using IoT devices.In this episode, you will hear:Valuable insights into privacy risks and vulnerabilities within IoT devices and discover expert solutions to tackle them.The importance of increasing consumer awareness for preserving privacy while using IoT devices.The complexities of cybersecurity challenges and integrating security measures within IoT devices and regulations.The technical aspects of IoT devices, such as encryption, protocols, and shared infrastructure.Future plans by empowering users and cooperating with protection authorities and organizations for a more secure IoT environment.Our guest in this episode is Anna Maria Mandalari.Brian and John talk with Anna Maria Mandalari, a talented IoT privacy and security expert who has dedicated her career to understanding and addressing the vulnerabilities of IoT devices. Beginning her education journey in Italy, Anna specialized in Telematics before pursuing a Ph.D. in Internet measurements in Madrid. Her expertise in networking eventually led her to London's Imperial College, where she began focusing on IoT privacy and security. Now, Anna works at University College London, where she collaborates with other experts to develop innovative solutions for safeguarding consumer privacy in the IoT space. Let's get into Things on the IoT Security Podcast!Follow Brian Contos on LinkedIn at https://www.linkedin.com/in/briancontosAnd you can follow John Vecchi at https://www.linkedin.com/in/johnvecchiThe IoT Security Podcast is powered by Phosphorus Cybersecurity. Join the conversation for the IoT Security Podcast — where xIoT meets Security. Learn more at https://phosphorus.io/podcast

"If Tor is an anonymous remailer, meaning a protocol facilitating the anonymous forwarding and receiving of messages between peers, Nostr can function as an anonymous bulletin board. CoinJoin coordinators can publish their services via a Nostr event type, and CoinJoin wallets can be enabled to automatically pull from those relays to display within their clients." — L0LA L33TZ Today we dive into a really cool topic on how major privacy concerns can be thought of in relation to our interactions with a combination of information protocols and networks that we interact with, and why Nostr can bring significant privacy improvements to Bitcoin, despite it not being a privacy protocol. L0LA L33TZ brings us an article at Bitcoin Magazine that breaks it all down, which we dive into the impact of in the Guy's Take to follow. If you care about privacy in a Bitcoin future, don't miss this episode! Check out the original article at: https://bitcoinmagazine.com/technical/how-nostr-can-improve-bitcoin-privacy Guy's Nostr Pubkey: npub1h8nk2346qezka5cpm8jjh3yl5j88pf4ly2ptu7s6uu55wcfqy0wq36rpev Code BITCOINAUDIBLE gets 10% off your Bitcoin2023 tickets! Don't forget to check out our amazing sponsors: • The Swan IRA is live! Follow the link to find out how to get your tax free retirement funds, securely allocated to Bitcoin! The best place to onboard a true Bitcoiner - Stack sats automatically, withdraw automatically, and learn or get help from the best team of Bitcoiners out there with Swan Bitcoin. (https://swanbitcoin.com/guy) • Gets sats back every time you dump fiat at a store, to pay your bills, everything in your fiat life pays you sats with the Fold Debit Card and FoldApp. 20,000 FREE SATS! at (https://bitcoinaudible.com/fold) • Dive into the Bitcoin only wallet, the cypherpunk calculator, with the NEW Coldcard Q1! A company that has built secure Bitcoin products for nearly a decade. Code BITCOINAUDIBLE gets 9% off the ColdCard! (https://bitcoinaudible.com/coldcard) ------------------------ "The universe, our physical universe, has that property that makes it possible for an individual or a group of individuals to reliably, automatically, even without knowing, encipher something, so that all the resources and all the political will of the strongest superpower on earth may not decipher it. And the paths of encipherment between people can mesh together to create regions free from the coercive force of the outer state. Free from mass interception. Free from state control." — Julian Assange Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

"If Tor is an anonymous remailer, meaning a protocol facilitating the anonymous forwarding and receiving of messages between peers, Nostr can function as an anonymous bulletin board. CoinJoin coordinators can publish their services via a Nostr event type, and CoinJoin wallets can be enabled to automatically pull from those relays to display within their clients." — L0LA L33TZ Today we dive into a really cool topic on how major privacy concerns can be thought of in relation to our interactions with a combination of information protocols and networks that we interact with, and why Nostr can bring significant privacy improvements to Bitcoin, despite it not being a privacy protocol. L0LA L33TZ brings us an article at Bitcoin Magazine that breaks it all down, which we dive into the impact of in the Guy's Take to follow. If you care about privacy in a Bitcoin future, don't miss this episode! Check out the original article at: https://bitcoinmagazine.com/technical/how-nostr-can-improve-bitcoin-privacy Guy's Nostr Pubkey: npub1h8nk2346qezka5cpm8jjh3yl5j88pf4ly2ptu7s6uu55wcfqy0wq36rpev Code BITCOINAUDIBLE gets 10% off your Bitcoin2023 tickets! Don't forget to check out our amazing sponsors: • The Swan IRA is live! Follow the link to find out how to get your tax free retirement funds, securely allocated to Bitcoin! The best place to onboard a true Bitcoiner - Stack sats automatically, withdraw automatically, and learn or get help from the best team of Bitcoiners out there with Swan Bitcoin. (https://swanbitcoin.com/guy) • Gets sats back every time you dump fiat at a store, to pay your bills, everything in your fiat life pays you sats with the Fold Debit Card and FoldApp. 20,000 FREE SATS! at (https://bitcoinaudible.com/fold) • Dive into the Bitcoin only wallet, the cypherpunk calculator, with the NEW Coldcard Q1! A company that has built secure Bitcoin products for nearly a decade. Code BITCOINAUDIBLE gets 9% off the ColdCard! (https://bitcoinaudible.com/coldcard) ------------------------ "The universe, our physical universe, has that property that makes it possible for an individual or a group of individuals to reliably, automatically, even without knowing, encipher something, so that all the resources and all the political will of the strongest superpower on earth may not decipher it. And the paths of encipherment between people can mesh together to create regions free from the coercive force of the outer state. Free from mass interception. Free from state control." — Julian Assange Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/bitcoinaudible/message

Vielen von uns ist Datenschutz wichtig – und trotzdem geben wir unsere Daten freigiebig preis. Experten nennen das Phänomen “Privacy-Paradox”. Aber welche Mechanismen verbergen sich dahinter? Und: Gibt es dieses Phänomen auch in der analogen Welt? Martin Emmer von der Freien Universität Berlin kennt die Antwort. "Aha! Zehn Minuten Alltags-Wissen" ist der Wissenschafts-Podcast von WELT. Wir freuen uns über Feedback an wissen@welt.de. Produktion: Serdar Deniz Redaktion: Jakob Gierth Moderation: Elisabeth Krafft +++ Werbung +++ Du möchtest mehr über unsere Werbepartner erfahren? [Hier](https://www.mediaimpact.de/de/unkategorisiert/unsere-werbepartner-welt-podcast) findest du alle Infos und Rabatte. Impressum: https://www.welt.de/services/article7893735/Impressum.html Datenschutz: https://www.welt.de/services/article157550705/Datenschutzerklaerung-WELT-DIGITAL.html

A conversation with Juan Baron. In this episode, I am joined by another Juan…. Juan Baron! Juan is the Director of Business Development and Strategy for media and advertising at Decentriq. Decentriq calls itself The “Switzerland” of data that is coincidentally also headquartered in Switzerland..... Founded in 2018, the company is inventing novel technology to enable publishers, brands, researchers, platforms, and advertisers to collaborate data in a way that ensures privacy and security. Decentriq works with companies such as Roche, Microsoft and Intel to enable more privacy-focused data collaboration and audience matching. In a world where privacy is becoming an increasing focus across marketing and advertising, data clean rooms play an interesting role in the growth of first-party data sharing as third-party tracking is slowly becoming a thing of the past. In this episode, we have a fascinating discussion about the privacy paradox: balancing privacy and utility, the role of trust in data collaboration & sharing, how inventions in cryptography and ML are changing the Adtech ecosystem, and the scalability of data clean rooms in an increasingly saturated market. Go here for show notes, links, and resources. Follow Juan Mendoza on LinkedIn and Twitter. Listen on Apple, Spotify, Google, and everywhere else. You can find Juan on LinkedIn and Twitter.

Wenn man uns fragt, geben wir meist an, dass uns Datenschutz wichtig ist und wir Sorge bzgl. der Sicherheit unserer Daten haben. Aber irgendwie verhalten wir uns dann doch häufig absolut konträr dazu. Wir sprechen über Studien zu unserem komischen Verhältnis zum Datenschutz.Timestamps & Quellen:Begrüßung & Einführung (00:00)Teil 1: Wie wichtig ist uns Datenschutz (00:41)Umfragen zu Datenschutz und diesbezügliche Sorgen (1, 2, 3, 4)Social-Media NutzungTeil 2: Privacy Paradox (03:34)Studie von hpReviews zum Privacy Paradox (1, 2)Teil 3: Unser Verhältnis zu Datenschutz (08:50)Studie 1: entsperrtes Handy übergebenStudie 2: Geld für weniger DatenschutzFazit und Verabschiedung (16:39)

Die DSGVO und Datenschutz sind nicht unbedingt inspirierende Themen. Dennoch werden Daten die Zukunft maßgeblich bestimmen und vieles verändern und es hilft, die Rahmenbedingungen dafür zu kennen. In dieser Episode geben Timo und Michael den perfekten Überblick über Datenschutz aber auch Big Data und damit verbundenen Innovationen. Wenn du Begriffe wie Interoperabilität, das Privacy Paradox oder Smart Data bisher nicht kennst, solltest du diese Episode nicht verpassen.

Vielen von uns ist Datenschutz wichtig – und trotzdem geben wir unsere Daten scheinbar freigiebig preis. Darüber spricht der Mediennutzungsforscher Martin Emmer in seinem Vortrag.

Canada's Top Data Protection Expert Reveals The One Area Where She Is Completely TornSharon Bauer dedicated her career to privacy based on her strong belief that we all have a right to privacy, we all should be in control of our information, and free from interference in our private lives, especially from government and law enforcement. Sharon explains how the very tools that privacy and security pros get excited about, such as end-to-end encryption are the same tools that child abusers rely on to share images of child sexual abuse. Sharon sheds the light on Apple's announcement that it plans to scan iPhones for images of child sexual abuse and match them to known images in a database. She explains how Apple plans to scan users' encrypted messages for sexually explicit content as a child safety measure. Whilst we support a proactive approach to preventing such heinous crimes and commend Apple for trying to solve a problem that too many people are scared to talk about, Sharon explores whether this is a slippery slope to a surveillance state, whether the system will be accurate, and whether innocent users will be implicated due to incorrect predictions. Discover: What tech companies doing to combat Child Sexual Abuse Why privacy and security professionals are outraged by Apple How to deal with this ethical dilemma And so much more… Sharon Bauer is a privacy consultant. She is also a lawyer. She is the founder of Bamboo Data Consulting. Her firm specialises in privacy, security, data strategy and a range of cutting-edge technology ethics work. She provides strategic risk management and privacy compliance advisory services. Sharon works with diverse companies, from startups to multinational corporations, in industries such as technology, financial services, telecommunication, healthcare, sports, marketing, and retail. Sharon implements global privacy programs and acts as a virtual Chief Privacy Officer for various companies where she provides ongoing privacy advisory services. Before founding Bamboo, Sharon was a litigator for 10 years and then worked at KPMG in the national privacy team. Sharon is a sought-out speaker on privacy matters and emerging technologies and frequently publishes about privacy issues. Listen Now... Follow Jamal on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmjahmed/ (https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmjahmed/) Connect with Sharon on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/sharonbauerlawyer/ (https://www.linkedin.com/in/sharonbauerlawyer/) Join the Privacy Pros Academy Private Facebook Group for: • Free Weekly LIVE Training • Free Data Privacy ‘How To' Guides • Latest Data Protection Updates • Reports on GDPR Enforcement Action • Your Questions Answered by The King of Data Protection Apply to join here whilst it's still free: https://www.facebook.com/groups/privacypro (https://www.facebook.com/groups/privacypro)

Dr. Eric Perakslis, PhD is the Chief Science and Digital Officer at the Duke Clinical Research Institute.  In this incisive discussion, Eric exposes the curious nature of healthcare data. He proposes treating data like a digital specimen: one that requires clear consent and protection against misuse. Expanding our view beyond the doctor's office, Eric shows why adverse effects from data misuse can be much harder to cure than a rash. As well as our innate human tendency to focus on technology's potential while overlooking patient vulnerabilities. While discussing current data protections, Eric lays the foundation for a shift from privacy toward non-discrimination. Along the way, Kimberly and Eric discuss the many ways anonymous data can compromise patient privacy and the research it underpins. In doing so, a critical loophole in existing institutional review boards (IRB) and regulatory safeguards is exposed. An avid data advocate, Eric adroitly argues that proper patient and data protection will accelerate innovation and life-saving research. Finally, Eric makes a case for doing the hard things first and why the greatest research opportunities are rooted in equity.  A transcript of this episode can be found here. Our next episode features Yonah Welker. They are a ‘tech explorer' and leading voice regarding the need for diversity and zero exclusion in AI as well as the role of social AI. Subscribe now so you don't miss it.  

Standing in line at an airport is a bad experience. Shuffling through your wallet once you reach the front of that line only to realize you don't have your driver's license, that's a worse experience. From boarding airplanes to purchasing alcohol, the technology that enables digital driver's licenses already exists, but with adoption levels still so slow, the question is what's the hold up?“I always liken it to chess and checkers — checkers, super easy to play. And giving access to people is playing checkers. Giving access to people based upon them being who they say they are, that they're doing what they're supposed to be doing, that they are where they're supposed to be, that they've been given approval for those assets, that's chess.There's this notion of authentication authorization approval, and today it's expanded into verification and proofing. So four key components and just like chess, you learn how to play it relatively quickly, but you spend the rest of your life mastering it.”At least 17 states in the continental US have considered or implemented digital driver's licenses, but few have been able to create a system that leads to widespread adoption across the population and in government offices alike. On this episode ofIT Visionaries, Richard Bird, the Chief Customer Information Officer at Ping Identity, explains what the hold up is in getting digital driver's licenses to all 50 states, and he sheds light on the biggest obstacle that is stalling the adoption process.Main TakeawayThe Privacy Paradox: From GDPR to CCPA, all data privacy legislation requires companies to protect consumers from harm that could come by way of using its product or services. But there are few or no rules or guidelines that protect users from their own digital identities. This means that companies must take on a larger role in not only making sure that users' digital identities are secure, but that they are educating users on the proper ways to protect themselves.You're So Predictable: Digital identity experiences need a vessel to live on such as smartphones or wearable devices, but one of the big concerns from implementing these pieces of equipment is the amount of data that will be gathered from these events. What is the appropriate level of data aggregation and how much is too much when it comes to being able to predict things such as human behaviors and predictability patterns?A More Inclusive Environment: Digital identity has the power to be a key driver to globalgrowth and digital transformation, but at the same time it can also lead to data biases that are collected from these. If someone fails to update an address on their driver's license, that information could lead to misrepresentation of population.---IT Visionaries is brought to you by the Salesforce Platform - the #1 cloud platform for digital transformation of every experience. Build connected experiences, empower every employee, and deliver continuous innovation - with the customer at the center of everything you do. Learn more at salesforce.com/platform

ZDNet Security Update: Danny Palmer talks to BAE Systems Applied Intelligence's Holly Armitage about how organizations can use data they collect while also being ethical about it at the same time. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Join host Cameron D'Ambrosi and Chief Customer Information Officer at Ping Identity, Richard Bird as they discuss safeguarding remote workplaces as a huge shift of activity has been driven to the cloud due to the pandemic, vaccine passports, portable medical results, and records being something that humans are empowered to hold and manage, and the privacy paradox from GDPR to CCPA. Get your questions answered in this can't miss podcast!

Joined (for a 2nd time) by guest host Jake Teeny (28:39), Adam and Jake discuss the current hullabaloo surrounding the misinformation associated with the origins of COVID-19 (04:23) and what the latest patent approval by Spotify could mean for the future of playlist recommendations (34:44). Enjoy!   Learn more about Jake's charity of choice, PAWS Chicago. “PAWS Chicago is a national model in animal sheltering, committed to bringing an end to the killing of homeless cats and dogs”.   [News Story]   The Media's Lab Leak Debacle Shows Why Banning “Misinformation” Is A Terrible Idea   Spotify Patents Tech To Monitor Your Speech, Infer Emotion   [Episode Links]   Jake Teeny (www.EverydayPsych.com)   Our Website (www.WaterCoolerTalkPod.com)   Artwork (www.Kohney.com)

In the final segment of the interview Adam gives his views on why privacy is important, the privacy paradox, and why the UI behind apps that include privacy by default is usually not the most user-friendly, and about what we can do to improve the UI of privacy tools. Adam also briefly speaks about other projects, and also about the correlation between age and willingness to learn how to use new tools. It's an insightful interview you'll want to watch! Part 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=svn2uBamBXY&t=6s Part 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XFhMwsEkheE Part 3: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dsE2_yYihXQ Part 4: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uwnL_8Y5YnA Download Wasabi Wallet: https://wasabiwallet.io/#download Follow Adam on Social Media: https://twitter.com/nopara73 Download Wasabi Wallet: https://wasabiwallet.io/#download Follow Adam on Social Media: https://twitter.com/nopara73 Welcome to the 14th episode of Bitrefill's To The Moon Podcast. To The Moon is Bitrefill's new weekly podcast to discuss Bitcoin, altcoins, adoption, news & current events, and all things crypto. Join host Lawrence Ray, along with Jerry Okai, and Ricardo Martinez, for a light-hearted and humorous weekly discussion about the latest developments in the crypto economy. Join our Sphinx.Chat Tribe: https://tribes.sphinx.chat/t/bitrefillstothemoonpodcast Follow To The Moon Podcast on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ToTheMoonPod Follow Bitrefill on Twitter: https://twitter.com/bitrefill Browse Bitrefill's catalog of gift cards and mobile refills: https://www.bitrefill.com/ Sign up for a Bitrefill account: https://www.bitrefill.com/signup Download the Bitrefill app: iOS - https://apps.apple.com/us/app/bitrefill/id1378102623 Android - https://play.google.com/store/apps/detail…pp&hl=en_US&gl=US To the Moon on Anchor FM: https://anchor.fm/bitrefill Where the Moon Shines Bright by Kara Square (c) copyright 2020 Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (3.0) license. http://dig.ccmixter.org/files/mindmapthat/62227 Ft: Mr_Yesterday, Stefan Kartenberg

Is Apple being bullied by China? Does Apple really care about your privacy or is it all a lie? Is Apple helping the Chinese government to monitor its citizens? Why can't Apple move out of China? We answer all these questions and more in this episode. Read more about this topic here Please SHARE this episode on your social media platforms. We'd love to get your feedback, you can send an email to supreme.ndubisi@gmail.com Click here to send a voice message or wa.me/2348071312082. See you in the next episode! --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thesupreme/message

Can big data strengthen global inclusivity and trust? Information exchange has historically been the most powerful tool at humanity's disposal, so what makes data different? Dr. Long Chen (Luohan Academy) discusses his latest report "Understanding Big Data: Data Calculus In The Digital Era" which is available for download at https://www.luohanacademy.com/researc...

In this episode we discuss the two divides of the privacy matter, and how Apple is establishing itself as the ethical big brother of its customers and how it affects their relationship with Facebook, but most importantly, we discuss how this affects YOU. Do you care about your privacy? What do you think about how Facebook collects data from its users? Please we'd love to get your feedback, you can send an email to supreme.ndubisi@gmail.com and send a voice message to https://anchor.fm/thesupreme/message or wa.me/2348071312082. See you in the next episode! --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thesupreme/message

How many private details are you revealing online – and how valuable is that information? And more importantly what steps can you take to protect your data?

Future Tense a look at how we might be revealing more private details online than we think and the value in the information that’s being mined - and you’ll hear how you could protect your data by actually revealing more than you already are.

✘ Werbung: https://www.Whisky.de/shop/ Alle sprechen über Datenschutz. Die Wenigsten haben sich darum professionell gekümmert. Was in der DSGVO genau steht, wissen die Wenigsten. Ich habe vor etlichen Jahren meinen IHK geprüften Datenschutzbeauftragten gemacht. War alles für die Katz‘. Warum? Weil dann die DSGVO kam und das BDSG a.F. gegen das n.F. ausgetauscht wurde. Da wurde Bestimmungen gelöscht, hinzugefügt und ins Gegenteil verkehrt. Irre. Was passiert, wenn Sie heute eine Webseite aufrufen? Zuerst müssen Sie die Angaben zu Cookies wegklicken. Dann kommt meist eine Push-Nachricht, ob Sie einen Newsletter o.ä. empfangen wollen. Dann poppt eine Werbung auf. Manchmal kommt auch die Werbung zuerst und dann erst die Push-Nachricht. Und bei den meisten Abfragen ignorieren wir den Datenschutz. Was die Menschen sich so dabei denken ... oder auch nicht ... beschreibt die folgende Studie The privacy paradox – Investigating discrepancies between expressed privacy concerns and actual online behavior – A systematic literature review von Asusanne Barth Menno D.T. de Jong University of Twente, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, Services, Cybersecurity and Safety Research Group, PO Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands ► https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0736585317302022#! Datenkrake Tesla ► https://youtu.be/2XoSRikBC_Q

Episode Agenda:     1) Reading Session     a) David Baldacci- The Fix- Chapter 3     2) Education and Sports   a) Live 3rd Test-India vs Australia-Day 2     b)  The Privacy paradox          3) Song     a)  I want it that way       Next Episode- Episode 311-Unsettled- 11th January 2021 Sports Specials Every Monday     Global Broadcast timings: 11:00 AM (IST)/ 5:30 AM (UK)/ 4:30 PM (Sydney)/ 9:30 PM (Los Angeles)/ 12:30  AM ( New York)/ 2:30 PM (Tokyo)/ 6:30 AM ( Europe)/ 7:30 AM (South Africa)/ 1:30 PM (Singapore)

In this episode, we discuss the topic of privacy in general. Specifically, we discuss the paradox we all have between sharing information and our very own privacy concerns. Later in the episode, an important topic that is covered is the future of privacy and related consumer privacy laws. This is a very interesting topic for anyone who uses the internet (which is everyone) because we have explained the different ways internet information is being gathered and being used. For comments and feedback, Tweet to us @PesuvomPodcast , to send a voice message, please use the link in this episode description. You can also follow us on Instagram instagram.com/pesuvompodcast --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/pesuvom/message

Episode 103 of the EdTech Loop podcast has Danelle braking out the oversized scissors to help you cut through the digital clutter.Cut Through the Email Clutter: GmailIncrease productivity by sorting (star before folder names)*Action Required - green tagged*Waiting for Response - yellow taggedSettingsShow “send and archive” button in replySmart Compose (predictive writing suggestions appear as you compose an email)Smart reply (three suggestions for replies)Templates - “save draft as template”Cut Through the Grading Clutter: Streamline grading processCatlin Tucker high school English teacher and a featured speaker for MACUL 2020 - video:LIVE at Fall CUE 2019: She talks about the struggles with grading. “It’s time to rethink our workflow.  The teacher is doing the lion share of the work in the classroom. We know that the person doing the work is the person who is doing the learning.  Why would we rob our students of the opportunity to learn. We have to reimagine our workflow so that our students are doing the work in the classroom.”  Her example of a student led workflow:Student completes assignment.Student corrects mechanics using Grammarly before it’s “done.”Teacher gives students an exemplar and a rubric.Student is asked to look at what they did, compare it to the exemplar, assess their own skills using the rubric.Student reflects in a learning log.In this scenario, the students are doing the heavy cognitive lifting.  They are doing the learning. Instead of asking “How can I”....reframe the question as “How can the students…”  She shares some pretty awesome key shifts in the YouTube video - Teach students to track, monitor, and reflect on their progress, provide timely actionable feedback in class AS students work, make time to grade student projects with the students sitting next to you, partner with students and prioritize their agencyResearch to support student directed learning - it’s all throughout the ISTE Standards for Educators and Students. Cut Through the Distraction Clutter: New Year, New You, Digital Wellness - https://istedigcitpln.wixsite.com/home/digital-wellness (go here during pod), based off Manoush Zomoradi’s book: Bored and Brilliant:How Spacing Out Can Unlock Your Most Productive and Creative Self builds on that experiment to demonstrate how to rethink our gadget use to live better and smarter in this new digital ecosystem. Zomorodi explains the connection between boredom and original thinking, exploring how we can harness boredom’s hidden benefits to become our most productive and creative selves without totally abandoning our gadgets in the process. Grounding the book in the neuroscience and cognitive psychology of “mind wandering,” she illuminates what our brains do when we’re doing nothing at all. Also a TED talk 5 days - Keep phone in pocket, photo free day, delete that app, take a “fauxcation”, one small observation, dream house (creativity exercise)Data Savvy Project: https://istedigcitpln.wixsite.com/home/data-savvy-seriesFYI-Manoush is coming to MACUL 2020 and has two awesome podcasts, also started The Privacy Paradox (take back your digital data): IRL - “Online Life is Real Life.  Privacy breaches, closed platforms, hacking, fake news, or cyber bullying, we the people have the power to change the course of the Internet, keeping it ethical, safe, wierd, and wonderful for everyone.” Note to Self - “Is your phone watching you? Can texting make you smarter? Note to Self explores these and other essential quandaries facing anyone trying to preserve their humanity in the digital age.”  Cut Through The Edtech Noise Use your experts - everyone has a site online that will “help your students flourish” and will be the “gamechanger”.  Use your experts and ask their advice! They have studied this stuff, they know the research, and if they don’t, it’s their job to do the digging for you….EdTech CoachTech DeptREMC/ISDAnother Useful Link: https://www.ted.com/talks/yves_morieux_as_work_gets_more_complex_6_rules_to_simplify?language=en#t-4333Tech tool of the Week:New Year, New You, Digital Wellness - https://istedigcitpln.wixsite.com/home/digital-wellness https://medium.com/@whenifeellike/what-ive-learnt-as-a-17-year-old-who-deleted-all-social-media-d282274d4eddTranscripts will be coming.

Future Tense a look at how we might be revealing more private details online than we think and the value in the information that’s being mined - and you’ll hear how you could protect your data by actually revealing more than you already are.

This is Briefly, a production of the University of Chicago Law Review. Today we’re discussing some legal concerns related to the collection and use, or misuse, of personal data. Today’s podcast features interviews with Professor Lior Strahilevitz and Professor Omri Ben-Shahar, from the University of Chicago Law School. Check us out on Twitter at uchilrev, and our website at https://lawreviewblog.uchicago.edu/ This episode was produced by Yosef Schaffel. Music from bensound.com

Does privacy even exist?

Gini Dietrich, Martin Waxman and Joseph Thornley discuss the Privacy Paradox highlighted by Mary Meeker in her Internet Trends 2018 presentation. And we look at WeMo, just one mo' social network.Continue Reading → The post Inside PR 510: People over data appeared first on FIR Podcast Network.

You send us a lot of questions about managing tech-life. This week, Manoush has the answers.   Is there a secret to managing the overload of information coming at us every day? What about all those random accounts you’ve signed up for over the years - can we EVER make them go away? And how do we stay plugged in with friends and family if we decide to break up with social media? It’s the first-ever Note to Self advice show.   WE HAVE LINKS While researching this show we compiled a list of tools to help you manage information overload and your digital privacy, and ditch FOMO for JOMO. Setting an information goal. Manoush has some tips for resetting how you read, post, and browse online. No need to feel icky about Instagram. But when discipline and diligence don’t work out, it’s okay to seek help. Our favorites: airplane mode (sorry), Moment for iOS, Freedom, and Self Control. Also, try some DIY adjustments to your app permissions - turn off your cellular data for Instagram, Twitter, Facebook, and you can’t browse when you’re out and about. Oh, also check out Infomagical - a week’s worth of challenges, with Manoush’s moral support, to help you manage infomania. Bonus: Manoush recommends some of her favorite newsletters in the show. What makes it past her info-management threshold? The Ann Friedman Weekly, Axios, Quartzy, REDEF, and Dave Pell’s Next Draft. Reclaiming your digital self. Digital privacy matters - even if you don’t have something to hide. That’s why we dedicated a whole project to it last year: The Privacy Paradox. Good for first timers, and even worth a refresher. Other things the team loves: from the EFF, a tool to help you track what’s tracking you online Deseat.me, to delete the random accounts you’ve accumulated over the years DeleteMe, a service you can pay to opt you out of data brokers Julia Angwin’s DIY guide/report on opting out of over 200 data brokers and JustDelete.me, to find the cancellation pages for the services you’ve signed up for. Bonuses: our friend Mike Rogers, the developer we mention in the show, made a Chrome extension for JustDelete.me, and it’s open source. We also found this page, where Facebook lists the data brokers it buys from and provides their opt-out pages. Pretty helpful.     Also, we mention the quest for a perfect oatmeal cookie recipe in this episode, and how opening your phone for that can send you down a rabbit hole. So, to save you that one hunt, here.  

You send us a lot of questions about managing tech-life. This week, Manoush has the answers.   Is there a secret to managing the overload of information coming at us every day? What about all those random accounts you’ve signed up for over the years - can we EVER make them go away? And how do we stay plugged in with friends and family if we decide to break up with social media? It’s the first-ever Note to Self advice show.   WE HAVE LINKS While researching this show we compiled a list of tools to help you manage information overload and your digital privacy, and ditch FOMO for JOMO. Setting an information goal. Manoush has some tips for resetting how you read, post, and browse online. No need to feel icky about Instagram. But when discipline and diligence don’t work out, it’s okay to seek help. Our favorites: airplane mode (sorry), Moment for iOS, Freedom, and Self Control. Also, try some DIY adjustments to your app permissions - turn off your cellular data for Instagram, Twitter, Facebook, and you can’t browse when you’re out and about. Oh, also check out Infomagical - a week’s worth of challenges, with Manoush’s moral support, to help you manage infomania. Bonus: Manoush recommends some of her favorite newsletters in the show. What makes it past her info-management threshold? The Ann Friedman Weekly, Axios, Quartzy, REDEF, and Dave Pell’s Next Draft. Reclaiming your digital self. Digital privacy matters - even if you don’t have something to hide. That’s why we dedicated a whole project to it last year: The Privacy Paradox. Good for first timers, and even worth a refresher. Other things the team loves: from the EFF, a tool to help you track what’s tracking you online Deseat.me, to delete the random accounts you’ve accumulated over the years DeleteMe, a service you can pay to opt you out of data brokers Julia Angwin’s DIY guide/report on opting out of over 200 data brokers and JustDelete.me, to find the cancellation pages for the services you’ve signed up for. Bonuses: our friend Mike Rogers, the developer we mention in the show, made a Chrome extension for JustDelete.me, and it’s open source. We also found this page, where Facebook lists the data brokers it buys from and provides their opt-out pages. Pretty helpful.     Also, we mention the quest for a perfect oatmeal cookie recipe in this episode, and how opening your phone for that can send you down a rabbit hole. So, to save you that one hunt, here.  

You send us a lot of questions about managing tech-life. This week, Manoush has the answers.   Is there a secret to managing the overload of information coming at us every day? What about all those random accounts you’ve signed up for over the years - can we EVER make them go away? And how do we stay plugged in with friends and family if we decide to break up with social media? It’s the first-ever Note to Self advice show.   WE HAVE LINKS While researching this show we compiled a list of tools to help you manage information overload and your digital privacy, and ditch FOMO for JOMO. Setting an information goal. Manoush has some tips for resetting how you read, post, and browse online. No need to feel icky about Instagram. But when discipline and diligence don’t work out, it’s okay to seek help. Our favorites: airplane mode (sorry), Moment for iOS, Freedom, and Self Control. Also, try some DIY adjustments to your app permissions - turn off your cellular data for Instagram, Twitter, Facebook, and you can’t browse when you’re out and about. Oh, also check out Infomagical - a week’s worth of challenges, with Manoush’s moral support, to help you manage infomania. Bonus: Manoush recommends some of her favorite newsletters in the show. What makes it past her info-management threshold? The Ann Friedman Weekly, Axios, Quartzy, REDEF, and Dave Pell’s Next Draft. Reclaiming your digital self. Digital privacy matters - even if you don’t have something to hide. That’s why we dedicated a whole project to it last year: The Privacy Paradox. Good for first timers, and even worth a refresher. Other things the team loves: from the EFF, a tool to help you track what’s tracking you online Deseat.me, to delete the random accounts you’ve accumulated over the years DeleteMe, a service you can pay to opt you out of data brokers Julia Angwin’s DIY guide/report on opting out of over 200 data brokers and JustDelete.me, to find the cancellation pages for the services you’ve signed up for. Bonuses: our friend Mike Rogers, the developer we mention in the show, made a Chrome extension for JustDelete.me, and it’s open source. We also found this page, where Facebook lists the data brokers it buys from and provides their opt-out pages. Pretty helpful.     Also, we mention the quest for a perfect oatmeal cookie recipe in this episode, and how opening your phone for that can send you down a rabbit hole. So, to save you that one hunt, here.  

You send us a lot of questions about managing tech-life. This week, Manoush has the answers.   Is there a secret to managing the overload of information coming at us every day? What about all those random accounts you’ve signed up for over the years - can we EVER make them go away? And how do we stay plugged in with friends and family if we decide to break up with social media? It’s the first-ever Note to Self advice show.   WE HAVE LINKS While researching this show we compiled a list of tools to help you manage information overload and your digital privacy, and ditch FOMO for JOMO. Setting an information goal. Manoush has some tips for resetting how you read, post, and browse online. No need to feel icky about Instagram. But when discipline and diligence don’t work out, it’s okay to seek help. Our favorites: airplane mode (sorry), Moment for iOS, Freedom, and Self Control. Also, try some DIY adjustments to your app permissions - turn off your cellular data for Instagram, Twitter, Facebook, and you can’t browse when you’re out and about. Oh, also check out Infomagical - a week’s worth of challenges, with Manoush’s moral support, to help you manage infomania. Bonus: Manoush recommends some of her favorite newsletters in the show. What makes it past her info-management threshold? The Ann Friedman Weekly, Axios, Quartzy, REDEF, and Dave Pell’s Next Draft. Reclaiming your digital self. Digital privacy matters - even if you don’t have something to hide. That’s why we dedicated a whole project to it last year: The Privacy Paradox. Good for first timers, and even worth a refresher. Other things the team loves: from the EFF, a tool to help you track what’s tracking you online Deseat.me, to delete the random accounts you’ve accumulated over the years DeleteMe, a service you can pay to opt you out of data brokers Julia Angwin’s DIY guide/report on opting out of over 200 data brokers and JustDelete.me, to find the cancellation pages for the services you’ve signed up for. Bonuses: our friend Mike Rogers, the developer we mention in the show, made a Chrome extension for JustDelete.me, and it’s open source. We also found this page, where Facebook lists the data brokers it buys from and provides their opt-out pages. Pretty helpful.     Also, we mention the quest for a perfect oatmeal cookie recipe in this episode, and how opening your phone for that can send you down a rabbit hole. So, to save you that one hunt, here.  

You send us a lot of questions about managing tech-life. This week, Manoush has the answers.   Is there a secret to managing the overload of information coming at us every day? What about all those random accounts you’ve signed up for over the years - can we EVER make them go away? And how do we stay plugged in with friends and family if we decide to break up with social media? It’s the first-ever Note to Self advice show.   WE HAVE LINKS While researching this show we compiled a list of tools to help you manage information overload and your digital privacy, and ditch FOMO for JOMO. Setting an information goal. Manoush has some tips for resetting how you read, post, and browse online. No need to feel icky about Instagram. But when discipline and diligence don’t work out, it’s okay to seek help. Our favorites: airplane mode (sorry), Moment for iOS, Freedom, and Self Control. Also, try some DIY adjustments to your app permissions - turn off your cellular data for Instagram, Twitter, Facebook, and you can’t browse when you’re out and about. Oh, also check out Infomagical - a week’s worth of challenges, with Manoush’s moral support, to help you manage infomania. Bonus: Manoush recommends some of her favorite newsletters in the show. What makes it past her info-management threshold? The Ann Friedman Weekly, Axios, Quartzy, REDEF, and Dave Pell’s Next Draft. Reclaiming your digital self. Digital privacy matters - even if you don’t have something to hide. That’s why we dedicated a whole project to it last year: The Privacy Paradox. Good for first timers, and even worth a refresher. Other things the team loves: from the EFF, a tool to help you track what’s tracking you online Deseat.me, to delete the random accounts you’ve accumulated over the years DeleteMe, a service you can pay to opt you out of data brokers Julia Angwin’s DIY guide/report on opting out of over 200 data brokers and JustDelete.me, to find the cancellation pages for the services you’ve signed up for. Bonuses: our friend Mike Rogers, the developer we mention in the show, made a Chrome extension for JustDelete.me, and it’s open source. We also found this page, where Facebook lists the data brokers it buys from and provides their opt-out pages. Pretty helpful.     Also, we mention the quest for a perfect oatmeal cookie recipe in this episode, and how opening your phone for that can send you down a rabbit hole. So, to save you that one hunt, here.  

Welcome to day 12 of the 12 Days of Podcasts! Today's final recommendation comes from Stacey.

Pictured above is Alexander Nix, CEO of Cambridge Analytica, speaking in November 2017.  David Carroll is hunting for information. About himself. He knows himself pretty well. And so does a controversial marketing firm. Cambridge Analytica claims it holds up to 5,000 data points on over 230 million American voters. The company implied it was the secret sauce in the Trump campaign (then they took that back.)   But this company may share your online marketing profile with political campaigns, retailers, and potentially foreign governments. What if you, the profiled, wanted to have a look too? David, father of two, professor of tech-design and online ad researcher, made that request and now is suing for further information. This week, what David found. And didn’t find in his file. And what it could mean for our democracy.   You can request your own file from Cambridge Analytica. Let us know if you do and what you find. Feeling super creeped out about what marketing firms know about you? Turn that creepy feeling to action with the Privacy Paradox. Our series designed to help you reclaim your digital identity with easy, daily action-steps and podcasts.

Pictured above is Alexander Nix, CEO of Cambridge Analytica, speaking in November 2017.  David Carroll is hunting for information. About himself. He knows himself pretty well. And so does a controversial marketing firm. Cambridge Analytica claims it holds up to 5,000 data points on over 230 million American voters. The company implied it was the secret sauce in the Trump campaign (then they took that back.)   But this company may share your online marketing profile with political campaigns, retailers, and potentially foreign governments. What if you, the profiled, wanted to have a look too? David, father of two, professor of tech-design and online ad researcher, made that request and now is suing for further information. This week, what David found. And didn’t find in his file. And what it could mean for our democracy.   You can request your own file from Cambridge Analytica. Let us know if you do and what you find. Feeling super creeped out about what marketing firms know about you? Turn that creepy feeling to action with the Privacy Paradox. Our series designed to help you reclaim your digital identity with easy, daily action-steps and podcasts.

Pictured above is Alexander Nix, CEO of Cambridge Analytica, speaking in November 2017.  David Carroll is hunting for information. About himself. He knows himself pretty well. And so does a controversial marketing firm. Cambridge Analytica claims it holds up to 5,000 data points on over 230 million American voters. The company implied it was the secret sauce in the Trump campaign (then they took that back.)   But this company may share your online marketing profile with political campaigns, retailers, and potentially foreign governments. What if you, the profiled, wanted to have a look too? David, father of two, professor of tech-design and online ad researcher, made that request and now is suing for further information. This week, what David found. And didn’t find in his file. And what it could mean for our democracy.   You can request your own file from Cambridge Analytica. Let us know if you do and what you find. Feeling super creeped out about what marketing firms know about you? Turn that creepy feeling to action with the Privacy Paradox. Our series designed to help you reclaim your digital identity with easy, daily action-steps and podcasts.

Pictured above is Alexander Nix, CEO of Cambridge Analytica, speaking in November 2017.  David Carroll is hunting for information. About himself. He knows himself pretty well. And so does a controversial marketing firm. Cambridge Analytica claims it holds up to 5,000 data points on over 230 million American voters. The company implied it was the secret sauce in the Trump campaign (then they took that back.)   But this company may share your online marketing profile with political campaigns, retailers, and potentially foreign governments. What if you, the profiled, wanted to have a look too? David, father of two, professor of tech-design and online ad researcher, made that request and now is suing for further information. This week, what David found. And didn’t find in his file. And what it could mean for our democracy.   You can request your own file from Cambridge Analytica. Let us know if you do and what you find. Feeling super creeped out about what marketing firms know about you? Turn that creepy feeling to action with the Privacy Paradox. Our series designed to help you reclaim your digital identity with easy, daily action-steps and podcasts.

Pictured above is Alexander Nix, CEO of Cambridge Analytica, speaking in November 2017.  David Carroll is hunting for information. About himself. He knows himself pretty well. And so does a controversial marketing firm. Cambridge Analytica claims it holds up to 5,000 data points on over 230 million American voters. The company implied it was the secret sauce in the Trump campaign (then they took that back.)   But this company may share your online marketing profile with political campaigns, retailers, and potentially foreign governments. What if you, the profiled, wanted to have a look too? David, father of two, professor of tech-design and online ad researcher, made that request and now is suing for further information. This week, what David found. And didn’t find in his file. And what it could mean for our democracy.   You can request your own file from Cambridge Analytica. Let us know if you do and what you find. Feeling super creeped out about what marketing firms know about you? Turn that creepy feeling to action with the Privacy Paradox. Our series designed to help you reclaim your digital identity with easy, daily action-steps and podcasts.

This program was originally broadcast May 9, 2017. Today, a discussion about what we might call the privacy paradox. We say one thing when it comes to online privacy, but many of us act in decidedly un-private ways when we're on the internet. What do we mean by that? We often say that we don't want to be spied on -- by big government or by big data, the companies that collect and sell information about every place we go online. But our behavior suggests that we don't really care about our privacy as much as we say we do. We post all sorts of intimate details about our lives and our families. We voluntarily allow apps to know exactly where we are at all times. That information is valuable to all sorts of companies, and sometimes to certain government agencies. Do we, perhaps, care about privacy in some abstract way -- but not enough to behave online in a way that would keep our information more secure? And if we say we value privacy, are we, as a society, able to articulate what's wrong

Data mining is nothing new in presidential campaigns. But in 2016, the Trump team took voter research to a new level. They hired consultants called Cambridge Analytica, which says it has thousands of data points on every American. They also claim they can use that data to create personality profiles. Assessments of each of our hopes, fears, and desires - and target us accordingly. This is the science of psychometrics. And, as the story went, Cambridge Analytica’s dark digital arts helped Trump win, with ads designed to ring every reader’s individual bell. Or, did they? Over the past few weeks, reporters and data experts started asking questions. Where did this data come from? Could the Trump campaign really execute a micro-targeted social media strategy? Did they have a secret sauce? Or was it just more ketchup? This week, psychometrics and the future of campaign data-mining. With Matt Oczkowski of Cambridge Analytica, psychometrics pioneer Michal Kosinski, and Nicholas Confessore of the New York Times. And if you're curious about Apply Magic Sauce, the psychometric tool we all tried during the Privacy Paradox, you can find it right here.   Support Note to Self by becoming a member today at NotetoSelfRadio.org/donate.    

Data mining is nothing new in presidential campaigns. But in 2016, the Trump team took voter research to a new level. They hired consultants called Cambridge Analytica, which says it has thousands of data points on every American. They also claim they can use that data to create personality profiles. Assessments of each of our hopes, fears, and desires - and target us accordingly. This is the science of psychometrics. And, as the story went, Cambridge Analytica’s dark digital arts helped Trump win, with ads designed to ring every reader’s individual bell. Or, did they? Over the past few weeks, reporters and data experts started asking questions. Where did this data come from? Could the Trump campaign really execute a micro-targeted social media strategy? Did they have a secret sauce? Or was it just more ketchup? This week, psychometrics and the future of campaign data-mining. With Matt Oczkowski of Cambridge Analytica, psychometrics pioneer Michal Kosinski, and Nicholas Confessore of the New York Times. And if you're curious about Apply Magic Sauce, the psychometric tool we all tried during the Privacy Paradox, you can find it right here.   Support Note to Self by becoming a member today at NotetoSelfRadio.org/donate.    

Data mining is nothing new in presidential campaigns. But in 2016, the Trump team took voter research to a new level. They hired consultants called Cambridge Analytica, which says it has thousands of data points on every American. They also claim they can use that data to create personality profiles. Assessments of each of our hopes, fears, and desires - and target us accordingly. This is the science of psychometrics. And, as the story went, Cambridge Analytica’s dark digital arts helped Trump win, with ads designed to ring every reader’s individual bell. Or, did they? Over the past few weeks, reporters and data experts started asking questions. Where did this data come from? Could the Trump campaign really execute a micro-targeted social media strategy? Did they have a secret sauce? Or was it just more ketchup? This week, psychometrics and the future of campaign data-mining. With Matt Oczkowski of Cambridge Analytica, psychometrics pioneer Michal Kosinski, and Nicholas Confessore of the New York Times. And if you're curious about Apply Magic Sauce, the psychometric tool we all tried during the Privacy Paradox, you can find it right here.   Support Note to Self by becoming a member today at NotetoSelfRadio.org/donate.    

Data mining is nothing new in presidential campaigns. But in 2016, the Trump team took voter research to a new level. They hired consultants called Cambridge Analytica, which says it has thousands of data points on every American. They also claim they can use that data to create personality profiles. Assessments of each of our hopes, fears, and desires - and target us accordingly. This is the science of psychometrics. And, as the story went, Cambridge Analytica’s dark digital arts helped Trump win, with ads designed to ring every reader’s individual bell. Or, did they? Over the past few weeks, reporters and data experts started asking questions. Where did this data come from? Could the Trump campaign really execute a micro-targeted social media strategy? Did they have a secret sauce? Or was it just more ketchup? This week, psychometrics and the future of campaign data-mining. With Matt Oczkowski of Cambridge Analytica, psychometrics pioneer Michal Kosinski, and Nicholas Confessore of the New York Times. And if you're curious about Apply Magic Sauce, the psychometric tool we all tried during the Privacy Paradox, you can find it right here.   Support Note to Self by becoming a member today at NotetoSelfRadio.org/donate.    

Have you been to a testing conference? Wanted to go? Wondered which ones you should attend? Matt Heusser, Jessica Ingrassellino, and Michael Larsen have been to more than a few as participants and presenters. We discuss our favorites, the pros and cons of various conferences, and what makes each of them worthy destinations to consider.   Also, putting a different spin on the News Segment this time around, Michael shares his enthusiasm for and about “The Privacy Paradox”. Resourced by QualiTest Group

Data mining is nothing new in presidential campaigns. But in 2016, the Trump team took voter research to a new level. They hired consultants called Cambridge Analytica, which says it has thousands of data points on every American. They also claim they can use that data to create personality profiles. Assessments of each of our hopes, fears, and desires - and target us accordingly. This is the science of psychometrics. And, as the story went, Cambridge Analytica’s dark digital arts helped Trump win, with ads designed to ring every reader’s individual bell. Or, did they? Over the past few weeks, reporters and data experts started asking questions. Where did this data come from? Could the Trump campaign really execute a micro-targeted social media strategy? Did they have a secret sauce? Or was it just more ketchup? This week, psychometrics and the future of campaign data-mining. With Matt Oczkowski of Cambridge Analytica, psychometrics pioneer Michal Kosinski, and Nicholas Confessore of the New York Times. And if you're curious about Apply Magic Sauce, the psychometric tool we all tried during the Privacy Paradox, you can find it right here.   Support Note to Self by becoming a member today at NotetoSelfRadio.org/donate.    

Libraries have always been places for free and unfettered intellectual exploration. But how is this threatened by the inherent leakiness and insecurity of the networks we use to access information these days? In this episode we talk to Alison Macrina, Bill Marden, Melissa Morrone, Chuck McAndrew, and Phoebe Stein about privacy policies, CryptoParties, Tor relays, and other adventures. CORRECTION: The episode says that Chuck's surveillance self-defense courses can be found at leblibrary.org -- the website is actually leblibrary.com. Here is a link: https://leblibrary.com/online-self-defense Related Articles and Resources: BPL's Digital Privacy Curriculum: http://www.dataprivacyproject.org/ Protecting Patron Privacy, Library Journal, July 14, 2016 by Alison Macrina http://lj.libraryjournal.com/2016/07/digital-resources/protecting-patron-privacy/ ALA Questions and Answers on Privacy and Confidentiality http://www.ala.org/Template.cfm?Section=interpretations&Template=/ContentManagement/ContentDisplay.cfm&ContentID=15347 Library Patron Privacy in 2014 - Honoring the Legacy of Zoia Horn, CUNY School of Law, 2014, by Sarah Landon http://academicworks.cuny.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1060&context=cl_pubs A Flaw in the Design, by Craig Timberg, May 30, 2015, The Washington Post: http://www.washingtonpost.com/sf/business/2015/05/30/net-of-insecurity-part-1/?utm_term=.036cf687d2ce Library Freedom Project: https://libraryfreedomproject.org/ State Privacy Laws Regarding Library Records http://www.ala.org/advocacy/privacyconfidentiality/privacy/stateprivacy EFF's Surveillance Self-Defense: https://ssd.eff.org/en Tactical Tech's Security-in-a-box: https://tacticaltech.org/projects/security-box Down the Security Rabbit Hole: http://podcast.wh1t3rabbit.net/ Privacy Paradox podcast: https://project.wnyc.org/privacy-paradox/ TechSNAP podcast: http://www.jupiterbroadcasting.com/show/techsnap/ Music and Soundtracks: Opening and closing track: “Magic” by Otis MacDonald This podcast uses these sounds from freesound: probe1gain by pheonelai (http://www.freesound.org/people/phoenelai/) Intro 1L72 by Setuniman (http://www.freesound.org/people/Setuniman/) etc.. Tools used to record this podcast: Blue Yeti microphone: www.bluemic.com/products/yeti/ Transcribe: transcribe.wreally.com/app Reaper: www.reaper.fm/ Izotope: https://www.izotope.com/en/products/repair-and-edit/rx-plug-in-pack.html

So, the C.I.A. has a back door to your phone. At least, according to the Vault 7 data dump from WikiLeaks. The documents—as yet unproven—say that if your device is connected to the internet, the American government wants in. And has a few tricky tools to do it. But they’ve had some sneaky tools for a while now. Just ask Daniel Rigmaiden. In 2008, Rigmaiden was arrested for filing fraudulent tax returns. And he couldn’t figure out how he was caught. He was careful. He stayed anonymous online, he used pre-paid debit cards and fake IDs. So he developed what his attorneys thought was a pretty crazy theory about government surveillance. And it turned out he was right. This week we revisit Daniel’s story. What he uncovered was more than a theory—it was a balancing act. The technology the government used to catch him was hidden to allegedly keep us safe. If criminals didn't know about it, they wouldn't be able to hack it. But does that secrecy actually open us up to other dangers? We hear from Nate Freed Wessler, staff attorney with the ACLU Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project, about a movement to give us a bigger say in how law enforcement does surveillance. Because things are moving fast. For more on what we know about the leaked documents, which WikiLeaks is calling “Vault 7,” read our round-up of the news here. And if these revelations have you thinking about privacy in a whole new way, try our Privacy Paradox challenges. You can start them any time. Support Note to Self by becoming a member today at NotetoSelfRadio.org/donate.   

So, the C.I.A. has a back door to your phone. At least, according to the Vault 7 data dump from WikiLeaks. The documents—as yet unproven—say that if your device is connected to the internet, the American government wants in. And has a few tricky tools to do it. But they’ve had some sneaky tools for a while now. Just ask Daniel Rigmaiden. In 2008, Rigmaiden was arrested for filing fraudulent tax returns. And he couldn’t figure out how he was caught. He was careful. He stayed anonymous online, he used pre-paid debit cards and fake IDs. So he developed what his attorneys thought was a pretty crazy theory about government surveillance. And it turned out he was right. This week we revisit Daniel’s story. What he uncovered was more than a theory—it was a balancing act. The technology the government used to catch him was hidden to allegedly keep us safe. If criminals didn't know about it, they wouldn't be able to hack it. But does that secrecy actually open us up to other dangers? We hear from Nate Freed Wessler, staff attorney with the ACLU Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project, about a movement to give us a bigger say in how law enforcement does surveillance. Because things are moving fast. For more on what we know about the leaked documents, which WikiLeaks is calling “Vault 7,” read our round-up of the news here. And if these revelations have you thinking about privacy in a whole new way, try our Privacy Paradox challenges. You can start them any time. Support Note to Self by becoming a member today at NotetoSelfRadio.org/donate.   

So, the C.I.A. has a back door to your phone. At least, according to the Vault 7 data dump from WikiLeaks. The documents—as yet unproven—say that if your device is connected to the internet, the American government wants in. And has a few tricky tools to do it. But they’ve had some sneaky tools for a while now. Just ask Daniel Rigmaiden. In 2008, Rigmaiden was arrested for filing fraudulent tax returns. And he couldn’t figure out how he was caught. He was careful. He stayed anonymous online, he used pre-paid debit cards and fake IDs. So he developed what his attorneys thought was a pretty crazy theory about government surveillance. And it turned out he was right. This week we revisit Daniel’s story. What he uncovered was more than a theory—it was a balancing act. The technology the government used to catch him was hidden to allegedly keep us safe. If criminals didn't know about it, they wouldn't be able to hack it. But does that secrecy actually open us up to other dangers? We hear from Nate Freed Wessler, staff attorney with the ACLU Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project, about a movement to give us a bigger say in how law enforcement does surveillance. Because things are moving fast. For more on what we know about the leaked documents, which WikiLeaks is calling “Vault 7,” read our round-up of the news here. And if these revelations have you thinking about privacy in a whole new way, try our Privacy Paradox challenges. You can start them any time. Support Note to Self by becoming a member today at NotetoSelfRadio.org/donate.   

So, the C.I.A. has a back door to your phone. At least, according to the Vault 7 data dump from WikiLeaks. The documents—as yet unproven—say that if your device is connected to the internet, the American government wants in. And has a few tricky tools to do it. But they’ve had some sneaky tools for a while now. Just ask Daniel Rigmaiden. In 2008, Rigmaiden was arrested for filing fraudulent tax returns. And he couldn’t figure out how he was caught. He was careful. He stayed anonymous online, he used pre-paid debit cards and fake IDs. So he developed what his attorneys thought was a pretty crazy theory about government surveillance. And it turned out he was right. This week we revisit Daniel’s story. What he uncovered was more than a theory—it was a balancing act. The technology the government used to catch him was hidden to allegedly keep us safe. If criminals didn't know about it, they wouldn't be able to hack it. But does that secrecy actually open us up to other dangers? We hear from Nate Freed Wessler, staff attorney with the ACLU Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project, about a movement to give us a bigger say in how law enforcement does surveillance. Because things are moving fast. For more on what we know about the leaked documents, which WikiLeaks is calling “Vault 7,” read our round-up of the news here. And if these revelations have you thinking about privacy in a whole new way, try our Privacy Paradox challenges. You can start them any time. Support Note to Self by becoming a member today at NotetoSelfRadio.org/donate.   

So, the C.I.A. has a back door to your phone. At least, according to the Vault 7 data dump from WikiLeaks. The documents—as yet unproven—say that if your device is connected to the internet, the American government wants in. And has a few tricky tools to do it. But they’ve had some sneaky tools for a while now. Just ask Daniel Rigmaiden. In 2008, Rigmaiden was arrested for filing fraudulent tax returns. And he couldn’t figure out how he was caught. He was careful. He stayed anonymous online, he used pre-paid debit cards and fake IDs. So he developed what his attorneys thought was a pretty crazy theory about government surveillance. And it turned out he was right. This week we revisit Daniel’s story. What he uncovered was more than a theory—it was a balancing act. The technology the government used to catch him was hidden to allegedly keep us safe. If criminals didn't know about it, they wouldn't be able to hack it. But does that secrecy actually open us up to other dangers? We hear from Nate Freed Wessler, staff attorney with the ACLU Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project, about a movement to give us a bigger say in how law enforcement does surveillance. Because things are moving fast. For more on what we know about the leaked documents, which WikiLeaks is calling “Vault 7,” read our round-up of the news here. And if these revelations have you thinking about privacy in a whole new way, try our Privacy Paradox challenges. You can start them any time. Support Note to Self by becoming a member today at NotetoSelfRadio.org/donate.   

FEATURED CONTENTYour Professional Personal Learning Network (PLN) is an invaluable resource to both your career in education as well as your private life outside the walls of your school. In the third episode of PodcastPD, Chris, AJ, and I discuss the people you should include in our PLN and how to go about building a PLN of your own (step 1-include US!).Personally, we like to build our PLN with people who are: like-minded, share the same interests, share ideas, positive and upbeat, and push our learning and thinking. We connect in a variety of ways and a variety of platforms, from Twitter and Voxer to Facebook and CoffeeEdu (be brave-start your own!). We even discuss less traditional but more fun ways to connect with you PLN, like DinerEdu, EdCampOut, and BoardGameEdu! What would be your entry point for building your PLN? Who would you connect with?LINKS AND RESOURCESOur favorite Twitter chats:#BFC530#SSTLAP#TLAPFind a chat that will help you grow your PLNVoxer Walkie Talkie AppOvercast.fmInnovator's Mindset MOOCWHAT WE'RE LEARNINGAJ is currently reading Blended Learning in Action: A Practical Guide Toward Sustainable Change by Catlin Tucker, Jason Todd Green and Tiffany Wyckoff.Chris recommended a podcast from WNYC (NPR) called Note to Self. His wife recently turned him on to this podcast and his jumping off point was a series of episodes called The Privacy Paradox.What is the Privacy Paradox? It's the term behavioral economists use to describe the disconnect between our feelings about digital privacy (we value it!) and how we act online (we give privacy away!).Stacey is back to listening to podcasts (YAY!) after a really long affair with the OverDrive app! She recently listened to NPR's Hidden Brain, specifically episodes 59 and 60. Each of these episodes deal with current events and have a place in any SS, political science, psychology, or humanities class.PodcastPD MailbagShout out to Bruce Reicher (@breicher), fellow NJ educator who is enjoying the podcast and let us know by tweeting to us @PodcastPD. Thanks for listening Bruce!Shout out to Tina Monteleone (@tinamonte), another NJ educator, she's a MS technology teacher and college professor who has enjoyed the launch and beginnings of this podcast! See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

On this week’s Inside PR, Martin Waxman and Joseph Thornley talk about: Note to Self's Privacy Paradox series We recommend that you click over to Privacy Paradox, a project of WNYC's excellent Note to Selfpodcast. Register to participate and each day for five days you will receive and email with links to a special podcast episode, personal challenges... Continue Reading → The post Inside PR 467: No time for sleep appeared first on FIR Podcast Network.

On this week’s Inside PR, Martin Waxman and Joseph Thornley talk about: Note to Self’s Privacy Paradox series We recommend that you click over to Privacy Paradox, a project of WNYC’s excellent Note to Selfpodcast. Register to participate and each day for five days you will receive and email with links to a special podcast episode, personal challenges... Continue Reading → The post Inside PR 467: No time for sleep appeared first on FIR Podcast Network.

#04 De Privacy Paradox: je hebt zeker iets te verbergen by Natalie, Kim & Esther

This week, the results are in. Tens of thousands of people joined the Privacy Paradox challenge. And it changed you. Before the project, we asked if you knew how to get more privacy into your life—43 percent said you did. After the project, that number went up to 80 percent. Almost 90 percent of you also said this project showed you privacy invasions you didn’t know existed. When we asked you what this project made you want to do, only 7 percent of you said “give up.” Sorry guys! Don’t. Fully 70 percent of you said you want to push for protection of our digital rights. We have ideas for that in our tip sheet. A third of you said you’ll delete a social media profile. Another third said this project made you want to meditate. And just one more stat. We tallied your answers to our privacy personality quiz and gave you a personality profile. One-fifth of us were true believers in privacy before the project. Now half us are. Manoush says that includes her. In this episode, we talk through the results, and look to the future of privacy. With Michal Kosinski, creator of Apply Magic Sauce, and Solon Barocas, who studies the ethics of machine learning at Microsoft Research. Plus, reports from our listeners on the good, the bad and the ugly of their digital data. Support Note to Self by becoming a member today at NotetoSelfRadio.org/donate.    

This week, the results are in. Tens of thousands of people joined the Privacy Paradox challenge. And it changed you. Before the project, we asked if you knew how to get more privacy into your life—43 percent said you did. After the project, that number went up to 80 percent. Almost 90 percent of you also said this project showed you privacy invasions you didn’t know existed. When we asked you what this project made you want to do, only 7 percent of you said “give up.” Sorry guys! Don’t. Fully 70 percent of you said you want to push for protection of our digital rights. We have ideas for that in our tip sheet. A third of you said you’ll delete a social media profile. Another third said this project made you want to meditate. And just one more stat. We tallied your answers to our privacy personality quiz and gave you a personality profile. One-fifth of us were true believers in privacy before the project. Now half us are. Manoush says that includes her. In this episode, we talk through the results, and look to the future of privacy. With Michal Kosinski, creator of Apply Magic Sauce, and Solon Barocas, who studies the ethics of machine learning at Microsoft Research. Plus, reports from our listeners on the good, the bad and the ugly of their digital data. Support Note to Self by becoming a member today at NotetoSelfRadio.org/donate.    

This week, the results are in. Tens of thousands of people joined the Privacy Paradox challenge. And it changed you. Before the project, we asked if you knew how to get more privacy into your life—43 percent said you did. After the project, that number went up to 80 percent. Almost 90 percent of you also said this project showed you privacy invasions you didn’t know existed. When we asked you what this project made you want to do, only 7 percent of you said “give up.” Sorry guys! Don’t. Fully 70 percent of you said you want to push for protection of our digital rights. We have ideas for that in our tip sheet. A third of you said you’ll delete a social media profile. Another third said this project made you want to meditate. And just one more stat. We tallied your answers to our privacy personality quiz and gave you a personality profile. One-fifth of us were true believers in privacy before the project. Now half us are. Manoush says that includes her. In this episode, we talk through the results, and look to the future of privacy. With Michal Kosinski, creator of Apply Magic Sauce, and Solon Barocas, who studies the ethics of machine learning at Microsoft Research. Plus, reports from our listeners on the good, the bad and the ugly of their digital data. Support Note to Self by becoming a member today at NotetoSelfRadio.org/donate.    

This week, the results are in. Tens of thousands of people joined the Privacy Paradox challenge. And it changed you. Before the project, we asked if you knew how to get more privacy into your life—43 percent said you did. After the project, that number went up to 80 percent. Almost 90 percent of you also said this project showed you privacy invasions you didn’t know existed. When we asked you what this project made you want to do, only 7 percent of you said “give up.” Sorry guys! Don’t. Fully 70 percent of you said you want to push for protection of our digital rights. We have ideas for that in our tip sheet. A third of you said you’ll delete a social media profile. Another third said this project made you want to meditate. And just one more stat. We tallied your answers to our privacy personality quiz and gave you a personality profile. One-fifth of us were true believers in privacy before the project. Now half us are. Manoush says that includes her. In this episode, we talk through the results, and look to the future of privacy. With Michal Kosinski, creator of Apply Magic Sauce, and Solon Barocas, who studies the ethics of machine learning at Microsoft Research. Plus, reports from our listeners on the good, the bad and the ugly of their digital data. Support Note to Self by becoming a member today at NotetoSelfRadio.org/donate.    

This week, the results are in. Tens of thousands of people joined the Privacy Paradox challenge. And it changed you. Before the project, we asked if you knew how to get more privacy into your life—43 percent said you did. After the project, that number went up to 80 percent. Almost 90 percent of you also said this project showed you privacy invasions you didn’t know existed. When we asked you what this project made you want to do, only 7 percent of you said “give up.” Sorry guys! Don’t. Fully 70 percent of you said you want to push for protection of our digital rights. We have ideas for that in our tip sheet. A third of you said you’ll delete a social media profile. Another third said this project made you want to meditate. And just one more stat. We tallied your answers to our privacy personality quiz and gave you a personality profile. One-fifth of us were true believers in privacy before the project. Now half us are. Manoush says that includes her. In this episode, we talk through the results, and look to the future of privacy. With Michal Kosinski, creator of Apply Magic Sauce, and Solon Barocas, who studies the ethics of machine learning at Microsoft Research. Plus, reports from our listeners on the good, the bad and the ugly of their digital data. Support Note to Self by becoming a member today at NotetoSelfRadio.org/donate.    

You've made it. It's final chapter of the 5-day Privacy Paradox challenges. We hear from the one and only Sir Tim Berners-Lee, the inventor of the World Wide Web. And we set some terms for ourselves about how we want to live online, and what we—all of us, together—can do to create the web we really want. And while you're thinking about the future, take our Exit Strategy Quiz to find out how far you’ve come, and get a tip sheet with actions—big and small, individual and collective—to re-invent the internet to work for us.  Sir Tim thinks we can do it. And hey, he already did it once, right? And if you haven't already—sign up for the 5-day newsletter here to get details on each day's action step. Don't worry if you're signing up after February 10th, we'll get you the challenges on your schedule. The project lives on! Support Note to Self by becoming a member today at NotetoSelfRadio.org/donate.   

Sometimes, technology just doesn't work. Whether it's files not downloading correctly or the internet crashing, technology issues can interrupt the flow of your law firm or business. In this episode of the Kennedy-Mighell Report, Dennis Kennedy and Tom Mighell discuss troubleshooting, including their own four step approach to fixing technology problems. They also talk about the importance of backing up your files and what to do when absolutely nothing else works. In their second segment, they answer an audience question about artificial intelligence and its potential in the professional world. This episode's parting shots include the call to listen to the Note to Self podcast, specifically their privacy initiative entitled the Privacy Paradox, and a list of the top ten ways to extend your laptop's battery life. Special thanks to our sponsor, ServeNow.

You've made it. It's final chapter of the 5-day Privacy Paradox challenges. We hear from the one and only Sir Tim Berners-Lee, the inventor of the World Wide Web. And we set some terms for ourselves about how we want to live online, and what we—all of us, together—can do to create the web we really want. And while you're thinking about the future, take our Exit Strategy Quiz to find out how far you’ve come, and get a tip sheet with actions—big and small, individual and collective—to re-invent the internet to work for us.  Sir Tim thinks we can do it. And hey, he already did it once, right? And if you haven't already—sign up for the 5-day newsletter here to get details on each day's action step. Don't worry if you're signing up after February 10th, we'll get you the challenges on your schedule. The project lives on! Support Note to Self by becoming a member today at NotetoSelfRadio.org/donate.   

You've made it. It's final chapter of the 5-day Privacy Paradox challenges. We hear from the one and only Sir Tim Berners-Lee, the inventor of the World Wide Web. And we set some terms for ourselves about how we want to live online, and what we—all of us, together—can do to create the web we really want. And while you're thinking about the future, take our Exit Strategy Quiz to find out how far you’ve come, and get a tip sheet with actions—big and small, individual and collective—to re-invent the internet to work for us.  Sir Tim thinks we can do it. And hey, he already did it once, right? And if you haven't already—sign up for the 5-day newsletter here to get details on each day's action step. Don't worry if you're signing up after February 10th, we'll get you the challenges on your schedule. The project lives on! Support Note to Self by becoming a member today at NotetoSelfRadio.org/donate.   

You've made it. It's final chapter of the 5-day Privacy Paradox challenges. We hear from the one and only Sir Tim Berners-Lee, the inventor of the World Wide Web. And we set some terms for ourselves about how we want to live online, and what we—all of us, together—can do to create the web we really want. And while you're thinking about the future, take our Exit Strategy Quiz to find out how far you’ve come, and get a tip sheet with actions—big and small, individual and collective—to re-invent the internet to work for us.  Sir Tim thinks we can do it. And hey, he already did it once, right? And if you haven't already—sign up for the 5-day newsletter here to get details on each day's action step. Don't worry if you're signing up after February 10th, we'll get you the challenges on your schedule. The project lives on! Support Note to Self by becoming a member today at NotetoSelfRadio.org/donate.   

Welche Rolle spielen Big Data und Machine Learning in der heutigen Medizin? Daten-Methoden könnten im "Heiligen Gral" der Diagnostik helfen, zu präziseren Aussagen zu kommen. Die Auswertung der Behandlungsdaten könnte viel über die Wirksamkeit von Medikamenten oder Prozeduren verraten. Aber meist sind die Verfügbarkeit und Qualität der Daten der Bremsklotz. Und wir geraten ins "Privacy Paradox" - geben wir unsere individuellen Daten preis, um zusammen von besseren Methoden zu profitieren?

You've made it. It's final chapter of the 5-day Privacy Paradox challenges. We hear from the one and only Sir Tim Berners-Lee, the inventor of the World Wide Web. And we set some terms for ourselves about how we want to live online, and what we—all of us, together—can do to create the web we really want. And while you're thinking about the future, take our Exit Strategy Quiz to find out how far you’ve come, and get a tip sheet with actions—big and small, individual and collective—to re-invent the internet to work for us.  Sir Tim thinks we can do it. And hey, he already did it once, right? And if you haven't already—sign up for the 5-day newsletter here to get details on each day's action step. Don't worry if you're signing up after February 10th, we'll get you the challenges on your schedule. The project lives on! Support Note to Self by becoming a member today at NotetoSelfRadio.org/donate.   

We've heard so many stories from you, listeners. You love the convenience of living online. But you want more control over where your personal information goes and who can see it. Researchers call this the Privacy Paradox.  Our 5-day plan, starting February 6th, is here to solve that digital dilemma. This week, we're laying the groundwork. What it'll take to resolve the privacy paradox -- and how it starts with you. In this episode, we'll hear from behavioral economist Alessandro Acquisiti, retired Harvard professor Shoshana Zuboff, who coined the term “Surveillance Capitalism," and -- of course -- more of you, dear listeners. Stories of ex-wives hacking social media accounts, stolen social security numbers, and (from a lot of you) that vague creeped out feeling.  Then, after you listen, join us and start resolving your paradox.  Sign up for the Privacy Paradox newsletter here. And, take our quiz to find your Privacy Personality.  From February 6th to 10th, we'll send you a daily newsletter, with an action step and a short podcast on the science, psychology, and technology behind that day’s challenge. You’ll learn where your digital information goes. You’ll weigh the tradeoffs you're making with each new app or service. And you’ll learn how to make digital choices that are in line with your values. We can do this. We can do it together. And it starts today.  Learn a little more about our upcoming challenges: day one, two, three, four, and five.    PS - If you're already signed up for the Note to Self newsletter, (a) thank you and (b) you also need to sign up for the Privacy Paradox newsletter. They're separate. The Privacy Paradox newsletter is time-limited and just for these challenges.  Support Note to Self by becoming a member today at NotetoSelfRadio.org/donate.    

We've heard so many stories from you, listeners. You love the convenience of living online. But you want more control over where your personal information goes and who can see it. Researchers call this the Privacy Paradox.  Our 5-day plan, starting February 6th, is here to solve that digital dilemma. This week, we're laying the groundwork. What it'll take to resolve the privacy paradox -- and how it starts with you. In this episode, we'll hear from behavioral economist Alessandro Acquisiti, retired Harvard professor Shoshana Zuboff, who coined the term “Surveillance Capitalism," and -- of course -- more of you, dear listeners. Stories of ex-wives hacking social media accounts, stolen social security numbers, and (from a lot of you) that vague creeped out feeling.  Then, after you listen, join us and start resolving your paradox.  Sign up for the Privacy Paradox newsletter here. And, take our quiz to find your Privacy Personality.  From February 6th to 10th, we'll send you a daily newsletter, with an action step and a short podcast on the science, psychology, and technology behind that day’s challenge. You’ll learn where your digital information goes. You’ll weigh the tradeoffs you're making with each new app or service. And you’ll learn how to make digital choices that are in line with your values. We can do this. We can do it together. And it starts today.  Learn a little more about our upcoming challenges: day one, two, three, four, and five.    PS - If you're already signed up for the Note to Self newsletter, (a) thank you and (b) you also need to sign up for the Privacy Paradox newsletter. They're separate. The Privacy Paradox newsletter is time-limited and just for these challenges.  Support Note to Self by becoming a member today at NotetoSelfRadio.org/donate.    

We've heard so many stories from you, listeners. You love the convenience of living online. But you want more control over where your personal information goes and who can see it. Researchers call this the Privacy Paradox.  Our 5-day plan, starting February 6th, is here to solve that digital dilemma. This week, we're laying the groundwork. What it'll take to resolve the privacy paradox -- and how it starts with you. In this episode, we'll hear from behavioral economist Alessandro Acquisiti, retired Harvard professor Shoshana Zuboff, who coined the term “Surveillance Capitalism," and -- of course -- more of you, dear listeners. Stories of ex-wives hacking social media accounts, stolen social security numbers, and (from a lot of you) that vague creeped out feeling.  Then, after you listen, join us and start resolving your paradox.  Sign up for the Privacy Paradox newsletter here. And, take our quiz to find your Privacy Personality.  From February 6th to 10th, we'll send you a daily newsletter, with an action step and a short podcast on the science, psychology, and technology behind that day’s challenge. You’ll learn where your digital information goes. You’ll weigh the tradeoffs you're making with each new app or service. And you’ll learn how to make digital choices that are in line with your values. We can do this. We can do it together. And it starts today.  Learn a little more about our upcoming challenges: day one, two, three, four, and five.    PS - If you're already signed up for the Note to Self newsletter, (a) thank you and (b) you also need to sign up for the Privacy Paradox newsletter. They're separate. The Privacy Paradox newsletter is time-limited and just for these challenges.  Support Note to Self by becoming a member today at NotetoSelfRadio.org/donate.    

We've heard so many stories from you, listeners. You love the convenience of living online. But you want more control over where your personal information goes and who can see it. Researchers call this the Privacy Paradox.  Our 5-day plan, starting February 6th, is here to solve that digital dilemma. This week, we're laying the groundwork. What it'll take to resolve the privacy paradox -- and how it starts with you. In this episode, we'll hear from behavioral economist Alessandro Acquisiti, retired Harvard professor Shoshana Zuboff, who coined the term “Surveillance Capitalism," and -- of course -- more of you, dear listeners. Stories of ex-wives hacking social media accounts, stolen social security numbers, and (from a lot of you) that vague creeped out feeling.  Then, after you listen, join us and start resolving your paradox.  Sign up for the Privacy Paradox newsletter here. And, take our quiz to find your Privacy Personality.  From February 6th to 10th, we'll send you a daily newsletter, with an action step and a short podcast on the science, psychology, and technology behind that day’s challenge. You’ll learn where your digital information goes. You’ll weigh the tradeoffs you're making with each new app or service. And you’ll learn how to make digital choices that are in line with your values. We can do this. We can do it together. And it starts today.  Learn a little more about our upcoming challenges: day one, two, three, four, and five.    PS - If you're already signed up for the Note to Self newsletter, (a) thank you and (b) you also need to sign up for the Privacy Paradox newsletter. They're separate. The Privacy Paradox newsletter is time-limited and just for these challenges.  Support Note to Self by becoming a member today at NotetoSelfRadio.org/donate.    

We've heard so many stories from you, listeners. You love the convenience of living online. But you want more control over where your personal information goes and who can see it. Researchers call this the Privacy Paradox.  Our 5-day plan, starting February 6th, is here to solve that digital dilemma. This week, we're laying the groundwork. What it'll take to resolve the privacy paradox -- and how it starts with you. In this episode, we'll hear from behavioral economist Alessandro Acquisiti, retired Harvard professor Shoshana Zuboff, who coined the term “Surveillance Capitalism," and -- of course -- more of you, dear listeners. Stories of ex-wives hacking social media accounts, stolen social security numbers, and (from a lot of you) that vague creeped out feeling.  Then, after you listen, join us and start resolving your paradox.  Sign up for the Privacy Paradox newsletter here. And, take our quiz to find your Privacy Personality.  From February 6th to 10th, we'll send you a daily newsletter, with an action step and a short podcast on the science, psychology, and technology behind that day’s challenge. You’ll learn where your digital information goes. You’ll weigh the tradeoffs you're making with each new app or service. And you’ll learn how to make digital choices that are in line with your values. We can do this. We can do it together. And it starts today.  Learn a little more about our upcoming challenges: day one, two, three, four, and five.    PS - If you're already signed up for the Note to Self newsletter, (a) thank you and (b) you also need to sign up for the Privacy Paradox newsletter. They're separate. The Privacy Paradox newsletter is time-limited and just for these challenges.  Support Note to Self by becoming a member today at NotetoSelfRadio.org/donate.    

This is the 32nd episode of the Social Media Security Podcast sponsored by SecureState.  This episode was hosted by Tom Eston and Scott Wright recorded April 25, 2013.  Below are the show notes, links to articles and news mentioned in the podcast: A Little Privacy, Please! Your Rights and Social Media Policies.  Tom and Scott discuss why you should be […] The post Social Media Security Podcast 32 – The Privacy Paradox, Twitter Hacks, Facebook Home appeared first on The Shared Security Show.

Talks from the Center for Internet and Society. The topics span a variety of topics relating to civil rights and technological innovation. CIS is housed at the Stanford Law School.

Talks from the Center for Internet and Society. The topics span a variety of topics relating to civil rights and technological innovation. CIS is housed at the Stanford Law School.

Talks from the Center for Internet and Society. The topics span a variety of topics relating to civil rights and technological innovation. CIS is housed at the Stanford Law School.

Talks from the Center for Internet and Society. The topics span a variety of topics relating to civil rights and technological innovation. CIS is housed at the Stanford Law School.