Podcasts about Qualitative

What if the most honest data in marketing is what people type into a search bar at 2 AM? In this episode of the Podfather Podcast, we sit down with Stephan Bajaio, a 20-year veteran of the search industry who has helped giants like FedEx, Comcast, and Siemens navigate the digital landscape. Stephan, a co-founder of a half-billion-dollar SEO company, shares his incredible journey—from surviving a WeWork acquisition to buying his company back before the implosion. We dive deep into the "alphabet soup" of modern marketing (SEO, AEO, GEO, AIO) and why the "O" for optimization is the only thing that truly matters. Stephan also reveals his secrets for LinkedIn networking, the power of genuine recommendations, and why trying to "game" the new AI search models is a fool's errand.     Timestamps Timestamp Topic Description 0:00 Welcome & Introduction to Stephan Bajaio 1:16 The LinkedIn Name Pronunciation Hack: A tip for hard-to-say names 2:22 The Power of 80+ LinkedIn Reviews: Quantitative vs. Qualitative validation 4:10 How to Ask for Recommendations: The "Kind Words" script 5:34 Using Reviews as a Career Asset: The 40-page printout that landed a co-founder role 7:03 Reciprocal Reviews vs. Earned Credibility: Why your reputation is on the line 9:22 The "Other" Inbox: Dealing with the aggressive spam of podcast promoters 11:37 Burning Bridges: Why sales aggressiveness ruins potential partnerships 13:40 PodMatch and the Reality of "Mic and a Computer" Podcasts 15:04 Vibe Logic: Stephan's new mission in digital marketing and technical SEO 27:51 The Alphabet Soup of Search: SEO, AEO, GEO, and AIO explained 30:46 The "Couch vs. Sofa" Data Trap: Why your ignorance is someone else's market share 31:58 Web Presence Intelligence (WPI): Placing your bets on the digital roulette table 33:40 The Unpredictability of LLMs: Why the same prompt gives different results 35:56 Personalization in AI: How your search history shapes your future answers 38:05 The 2000 Internet Boom Parallel: Overvaluations and the "Dial-Up" phase of AI 41:32 The Gold Rush Fallacy: Why the money is in the "picks and pans," not the gaming 43:08 Needs-Based Personas: Moving beyond "Paul the Pauper" to real consumer intent 69:16 How to Connect with Stephan: Cutting through the noise in his inbox 69:40 Outro: RoyCoughlan.com and the PodFather Network      

Following last weeks expanded conversation with Chris Scanlon about the Henderson Hospital Dr Fiona Warren discusses her journey through her research career which involved personality disorders, therapeutic communities, and service effectiveness. This episode, an expanded version of the original from 2021 explores the historical context, research challenges, and the future of treatment approaches. It complements the conversation with Dr Chris Scanlon. ' I have worked in the NHS and academic psychology teaching and researching “Personality Disorders” and related aspects such as impulsive behaviours and self-harm; offending; attachment styles and mentalization; treatment outcomes and staff training since early 1990s, including ten years in Clinical Psychology Training. Having trained more recently in coaching, I am also interested in contributing to the evidence base in coaching psychology. I have taught and examined both quantitative and qualitative methodologies. Doing much of my "growing up" as a psychologist and researcher in a Democratic Therapeutic Community, I am committed to the involvement of those with "lived experience" in Clinical Training, research and service development.' Key topics: Fiona Warren's career path from Henderson Hospital to university research and coaching. The significance of Henderson Hospital in pioneering personality disorder treatment. Challenges and ethics of conducting research in sensitive settings. Qualitative versus quantitative research methods in mental health. Cost-effectiveness studies of Henderson Hospital and their implications. Evolving understanding of trauma-informed care and its impact on research. The influence of therapeutic community principles like democratization and reality confrontation. Political, social, and structural factors affecting mental health service provision. The debate around what defines a therapeutic community and research standardization. Personal reflections on growth, healing, and the importance of nature and literature. Timestamps: 00:00 - Fiona Warren's background and career journey 02:23 - Heritage and research at Henderson Hospital 04:33 - Balancing research independence and clinical activity 06:58 - The importance of familiarity in research settings 07:52 - Using qualitative methods in personality disorder research 10:14 - Impact of trauma-informed conceptualizations on research 11:37 - Cost effectiveness of Henderson Hospital 13:03 - Service use reduction and economic implications 15:10 - Trauma, challenging behaviors, and the role of therapeutic environments 16:37 - Therapeutic pessimism and education in mental health treatment 17:42 - Gender differences in trauma disclosure and treatment receptivity 20:11 - Factors influencing the longevity and impact of research 21:15 - Political and social influences on Henderson's closure 23:23 - Challenges of replicating and scaling therapeutic communities 30:47 - Fiona Warren's review of treatment for personality disorder 35:32 - Debates around defining therapy and research standards in therapeutic communities 40:49 - Reflections on Henderson Hospital's closure and its legacy 55:06 - Personal sources of nourishment and resilience outside workResources & Links:

The Learning Leader Show with Ryan Hawk Read my NEW BOOK -- The Price of Becoming -  www.LearningLeader.com/Becoming Eric Ries is the author of The Lean Startup, one of the most influential business books of the past 25 years, and the founder of the Long-Term Stock Exchange, the first new U.S. exchange to both list and trade multiple stocks since NASDAQ launched 50 years ago. His new book is Incorruptible. Key Learnings The more successful a company becomes, the more valuable it is as a target. Companies are worth stealing and taking over. Most founders are naive about this and don't understand what's coming for them. They've been following the so-called best practices about how companies should be built, structured, and governed. Most of those best practices are value-destroying. Sol Price was a lawyer before he became an entrepreneur. He believed a lawyer had a fiduciary duty to put the client's interests before his own. So when he became a retailer, he asked: "Who's my client?" The customer. He treated the customer as the person he would rather die than betray. When competitors sold a product for less, he'd put up signs in his own store: "Don't buy this from me. You can get it cheaper somewhere else." He capped his margins at 14 percent. He paid above-market wages. It is so much easier to destroy than to create. One day, Sol came into work and couldn't get into his office because the locks had been changed. Investors had pushed him out and forced Fedmart to practice retail best practices. Within seven years, they bankrupted the company. We've built an economy that rewards people for cost-cutting without holding them accountable for the consequences to trustworthiness, brand, or culture. The origin story of Costco: Sol took two weeks off, then leased the office upstairs from Fedmart and started Price Club. One of the young guys who left with him, Jim Sinegal, had worked his way up from stock boy. Jim eventually started his own company using the Sol ethos. A few years later, their companies merged to form what we now call Costco. Wall Street routinely calls Costco the exception to every rule. Wall Street analysts say things like: "At Costco, they take money that rightfully belongs to shareholders and instead invest it in the customer experience." As if that's a criticism. Costco endures because it's protected by a governance fortress. A series of worst practices that resist outside pressure structurally. The $1.50 hot dog has been the same price since 1986. A McDonald's Big Mac was $1.60 in 1986. Today that same Big Mac in California is over $7. Costco sells more hot dogs than every Major League Baseball stadium in America combined. If they raised the combo to $7, it would be a billion dollars of extra net income. They could do it. They choose not to. "If you raise the price of the effing hot dog, I will kill you. So figure it out." Jim Sinegal said it to his COO in 2008 when costs were rising. Figure it out. Costco vertically integrated the hot dog supply chain. They own hot dog production plants in multiple cities. They worked deals with soda vendors. They did all that extra work for the privilege of not making more money on the hot dog. Harder is easier. "When you take the hard road, when you make a principled commitment, you get these almost unbelievable values. Because you're generating the most underrated and most valuable asset in all of business: trustworthiness." "Easy choices, hard life. Hard choices, easy life." Jerzy Gregorek, Olympic weightlifter. "Everybody wanna be a bodybuilder. Nobody wanna lift these heavy ass weights." Ronnie Coleman, eight-time Mr. Olympia. Everyone wants the outcome. Nobody wants to do the actual thing. Culture and mission can be cultivated, not commanded. Most leaders get this wrong. They say "I'm in charge of my team." But can you command your team to have integrity? Can you command it to have a particular culture? You have to make consistent, responsible choices, just like cultivating health in your body. Get reps. Eric gave practice talks at a Hobee's restaurant at 7 AM to six people just to get the reps. Caring and trying to do a good job is so unbelievably rare. That alone is a competitive advantage. Feedback tells you something about the person giving it, not about yourself. If someone reads Eric's manuscript and says, "This book sucks," he hasn't learned anything about the book. He's learned this person doesn't like this kind of book. When he stopped arguing with negative customer reviews and started studying who they came from, he noticed patterns. People 16 and younger loved the product. People 16 and older hated it. He learned who his product was for. Separate qualitative from quantitative feedback. Qualitative is for hypothesis generation. Quantitative is for hypothesis validation. When test readers told him a chapter wasn't working, that was qualitative. When the platform data showed nobody was getting past that chapter, that was quantitative. You need both to know what to fix. It is always too early until it's too late. Eric tells the story of a multibillion-dollar founder he warned before his IPO. The founder talked to his bankers, lawyers, and CFO. They told him Eric was a downer. The founder went public anyway with conventional governance. Five months later, his stock dropped 90 percent, and he was ousted. The best time to plant a tree is 40 years ago. The second-best time is today. Eric's checklist for building an incorruptible company: Encode your mission into the corporate charter. Most founders have never read their charter. If your mission statement says one thing but your legal charter says another, you're lying. The easiest fix: file a public benefit corp filing (PBC). Two pages. 44 states. Your lawyer can do it tomorrow. Identify your fiduciary commitments. Who would you rather die than betray? Is it your customers? Your employees? Product quality? You decide. If your answer is nobody, you're a sociopath. The whole book is for the people who actually want to accomplish something. Align your employees to that mission. Make sure everybody on the team is committed to the same fiduciary priority. Create a director's oath. Like the Hippocratic Oath for doctors, but for your board. They must pledge to commit to the company's mission. Board betrayal and investor pressure are leading causes of death of companies in the modern world. Make the directors accountable to somebody. Power without accountability is corrosive to the human spirit. Novo Nordisk is governed by a nonprofit foundation. Patagonia is governed by a perpetual purpose trust. John Lewis Partnership in the UK is governed by an employee ownership trust. IKEA, Vanguard, and REI all have these structures. The data shows these companies are dramatically more stable and higher performing than conventional structures. You are not stuck in traffic. You are traffic. People love to blame the system. But you're not just a passenger. You're part of what creates the system. Where you work. What you buy. What you give your attention to. Every one of those choices is fueling somebody's company, somebody's algorithm, somebody's bonus. The richest people in the world spend billions on PR because they know your individual choices matter. Use that power. Eric's champagne moment a year from now: a grassroots movement around Incorruptible. This book won't get wall-to-wall media coverage. It's antagonistic to people in power. So Eric hopes readers will hand it to their founders, their bosses, their friends. If consumers and employees start demanding, "I want to work in an incorruptible company," that's the toast. Reflection Questions What is your equivalent of Costco's hot dog? The one commitment you'd defend even when it's financially painful, even when the easy move would be to abandon it? Have you ever read your corporate charter, or the foundational document of your team or department? Does what's actually written match what you say you stand for? Where in your work or life would the harder short-term path build something more durable in the long run? Are you willing to lift the heavy weights? More Learning #258: Jesse Itzler: Creating Your Life Resume & Living Outside the Box #529: James Clear: Setting Up Your Future Self & Becoming an Optimist #565: Noah Kahan: The Art of Asking For What You Want Podcast Chapters 00:00 The Price of Becoming - Pre-Order Now!  01:03 Meet Eric Ries  02:55 Is It Possible to Build an Incorruptible Company?  04:04 Why Culture Alone Won't Save You  05:13 Sol Price, Fedmart, and the Locks That Got Changed  07:56 Why Wall Street Calls Costco the Exception  09:11 The $1.50 Hot Dog Story  13:59 Harder Is Easier: The Principle Behind It All  16:48 Why Governance Is Just Soul Craft  19:50 Building the First New Stock Exchange Since Nasdaq  22:33 Eric's Communication Style: Reps, Not Talent  30:52 The Opportunity Hiding in Broken Markets  31:59 How to Know Which Feedback to Listen To  35:39 Qualitative vs. Quantitative: Why You Need Both  37:23 The Whole Foods Cautionary Tale  40:25 The Founder's Checklist for Building Something Durable  43:44 Encode Your Mission Into the Corporate Charter  47:35 You Are Not Stuck in Traffic. You Are the Traffic.  52:37 The Champagne Question: A Grassroots Movement  55:27 James Clear, Author's Equity, and the Future of Publishing 56:43 EOPC

The user-agent string in the HTTP header has been there since the 1990s. The web was built with software navigating it on someone's behalf. For thirty years that someone was a human. That changes now. Matt Biilmann, CEO and co-founder of Netlify, was one of the first to take seriously what it means when the "user" navigating the web is an AI agent. He published the foundational essay on Agent Experience in January 2025, pivoted his entire company around it, and recently shipped netlify.ai as a separate entry point built for agents. We cover the four pillars of Agent Experience, why every product already has an agent experience whether you designed one or not, content negotiation as a way to tell agents to go to a different URL than humans, why SaaS is in real trouble (with a story from inside Netlify about ripping out vendor contracts), how the data-structure assumption that has defined software for fifty years is breaking, and the one thing every website owner should start doing this week.About the GuestMatt Biilmann is the CEO and co-founder of Netlify, the platform that started the Jamstack movement and is leading the shift from developer experience to agent experience. His January 2025 essay on Agent Experience is the foundational text for the discipline. Chapters00:00 Every product has an agent experience (cold open)00:35 The architectural question01:46 Welcome Matt to No Hacks02:15 When AX became a design constraint, not a concept06:44 The January 28 2025 essay and who got it first10:22 Why netlify.ai was built as a separate website12:44 Content negotiation: telling agents to go to a different URL13:54 Qualitative data and the Axis eval framework17:12 Does AX apply to e-commerce and content websites?20:59 The cumulative media argument (TV did not kill radio)25:00 User-agent in HTTP and Al Gore-era agent commerce laws26:33 SaaS business model is dead: build-vs-buy is shifting30:44 The end of structured content as a hard constraint40:25 One thing every website owner should do now43:08 Where to find Matt onlineKey TakeawaysEvery website already has an agent experience. Agent Experience is how AI agents currently interact with your product, whether through computer use, fetching, or working around the barriers you put up. It is not a feature you add. The only question is whether the experience is good or bad.The four pillars: Access, Context, Tools, Orchestration. Matt's framework for thinking about AX systematically. Access answers whether agents can reach your product at all. Context is the prompt-engineering equivalent for agents. Tools are the concrete capabilities you expose. Orchestration covers how agents string those tools together inside your product.Build a separate entry point for agents. netlify.ai is purpose-built for agents while netlify.com remains the human entry point. Content negotiation tells agents to go to one URL, humans see the other. The blessed-path approach beats trying to make one URL serve both.SaaS economics are shifting structurally. The build-vs-buy floor is dropping fast as AI lowers the cost of software. Traditional 90%-margin seat-based SaaS is in real trouble. Dev tool companies have upside because companies need more tools. Everyone else is going to be ripping out vendor contracts and building internally.The data-structure paradigm is breaking. Software engineering has operated on the Linus Torvalds principle that data structures matter more than code. LLMs are not built around data structures. Building software around LLMs means rethinking the assumption that drove fifty years of computer science.Notable Quotes"Every product has an agent experience because all of these agents, whether through computer use or through fetching your website or through working around the barriers you put up from them, have some agent experience right now. It is just a question of is it good or bad.""There is a reason it is called a user agent in the header. It was forward-looking.""We have been ripping out SaaS contracts. Sometimes it is heartbreaking. The rep calls to right-size the contract and the customer reacts with 'let me see if I can build it with an agent.' Then they call back and cancel instead.""The context and the flows and your creativity are probably more important than both the data structures and the code."What To Do NextOpen your website in Claude Code or ChatGPT and ask the agent to complete a real task. Watch where it stalls. That is your AX baseline.Check your traffic logs for AI assistant visitors (ChatGPT-User, Claude-Web, PerplexityBot, GPTBot). The number is rising whether you measure it or not. Cloudflare reports AI assistants are now 5.5% of all internet traffic, up from 3.9% six months ago.Read Matt's January 28 2025 essay on Agent Experience at biilmann.blog as the starting point. Then read the one-year retrospective for the four pillars framework.If you operate a developer tool or any product with a clear automation surface, start a simple eval scenario: take a fresh agent, give it a task, score whether it succeeds. Axis from Netlify will give a proper framework when it ships open source.Resources Mentionednetlify.ai (the agent-built entry point Matt and team shipped recently)netlify.com (the human entry point)Matt's original Agent Experience essay, January 28 2025: biilmann.blogMatt's "AI in the CLI: The Humanoid Robot of the Web" (August 2025)Claude Code (the agent that flipped broad accessibility for CLI coding agents)Connect with Matt BiilmannBlog: biilmann.blogLinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mathias-biilmann-christensen-a5a3805Twitter/X: @biilmann (x.com/biilmann)Bluesky: bsky.app/profile/did:plc:grjr4il5dredrsuj7nosb4pqMastodon: mastodon.social/@biilmannNetlify: netlify.com and netlify.aiConnect with No HacksWebsite: nohacks.coSubscribe to the newsletter: nohacks.co/subscribeMachine-First Architecture: machinefirstarchitecture.comNo Hacks is a podcast about web performance, technical SEO, and the agentic web. Hosted by Slobodan "Sani" Manic.

What if the biggest problem in senior living isn't the care — it's the culture?In Part 1 of this special role-reversal episode of Tips from Trestle, host Aaron Fish gets interviewed by Trestle Hospitality”s Kelsey Wilkinson — and the result is one of the most candid conversations the show has ever produced. Aaron shares the origin story behind Trestle Hospitality Concepts, including the now-legendary bathroom mirror moment that brought the brand to life. He unpacks the philosophy of "elevating the experience" in senior living and makes the case that the industry has been operating through only two pillars, while it truly is a three-legged stool. This episode is a must-listen for any senior living operator, culinary director, or community leader ready to think differently about how they serve residents.Tips from Trestle is sponsored by:- WiseOx: https://bit.ly/TFT_WiseOx- AdvantageTrust GPO: https://bit.ly/TFTAdvTrust- Dining With Dementia: https://bit.ly/TFT_DwD- 100% Leader: https://bit.ly/TFT_10000:01:30 — Why This Episode Is Different00:02:00 — The Origin Story of Trestle Hospitality Concepts00:04:00 — The Bathroom Mirror Moment00:06:30 — What Trestle Represents00:07:00 — From the Broadmoor to Senior Living00:08:00 — Where "Elevate the Experience" Came From00:09:30 — Every Touchpoint Counts00:10:30 — The Moments That Crystallized the Philosophy00:12:00 — The Pureed Meal Nobody Recognized00:13:30 — When Dining Sells the Apartment00:15:00 — Why Senior Living Resists Hospitality00:16:00 — The Three-Legged Stool Framework00:17:00 — Where the Time Actually Goes00:18:00 — Qualitative vs. Quantitative Metrics#TFT514 #SeniorLiving #SeniorLivingLeadership #ElevateTheExperience #HospitalityInSeniorLiving #SeniorLivingOperators #ResidentExperience #AssistedLiving #AgingWithDignity #SeniorCare #FoodServiceLeadership #ThreeLeggedStool #DiningExperience #SeniorLivingConsulting #HospitalityLeadership #TipsFromTrestle

Listen to Andrew Duckworth, Colin Forde and David Keene discuss the paper 'Supervised versus self-managed rehabilitation for patients with an acute first-time or recurrent patellar dislocation: the Physiotherapy Rehabilitation Post Patellar Dislocation (PRePPeD) external pilot randomized controlled trial and embedded qualitative study' published in the March 2026 issue of The Bone & Joint Journal.Click here to read the paper.If you'd like to get involved with the main trial if it is funded, please contact prepped@ndorms.ox.ac.uk.To find out more about the 2026 Annual Scientific Meeting of ISHA, visit www.ishasoc.net.Find out as soon as the next episode is live by following us on X (Twitter), Instagram, LinkedIn, Tik Tok or Facebook!

Cybersecurity practitioners face a persistent methodological problem: how should we reason about intelligent adversaries who observe our defenses, adapt their tactics, and choose targets based on our vulnerabilities? The field has responded with a fragmented toolkit. Quantitative risk assessment borrowed from safety engineering treats threat, vulnerability, and consequence as independent terms. Threat modeling frameworks such as STRIDE and attack trees emphasize structure but rarely quantify uncertainty. Game-theoretic models assume rationality and common knowledge that real attackers do not exhibit. Qualitative heat maps compress uncertainty into colored cells that cannot support budget optimization.This talk surveys these approaches critically, examining what each method commits you to and what it quietly sets aside. A common thread emerges: the alternatives can be understood as approximations to a Bayesian decision-theoretic ideal, each relaxing one or more assumptions for tractability. Modeling an adversary requires addressing four dimensions of uncertainty (what they want, what they know, what they can do, and how they decide) and the standard critiques of probabilistic cyber risk analysis (information asymmetry, correlated inputs, adaptation, the absence of objective base rates) turn out to be errors of naive practice rather than indictments of the methodology itself. Threat intelligence feeds, indicator matches, and shifts in attacker tradecraft fit naturally as Bayesian updates rather than as awkward inputs to frequentist frameworks. The survey closes not with a prescription but with a diagnostic question for practitioners and researchers alike: are the assumptions embedded in your chosen method appropriate for the decision you are trying to support? About the speaker: Pragathi Jha is a doctoral researcher in Industrial Engineering at Purdue University, where her work focuses on optimization, stochastic modeling, and game-theoretic approaches to decision-making under uncertainty. Her research lies at the intersection of operations research, applied probability, and strategic interaction, with an emphasis on developing rigorous mathematical frameworks for complex, adversarial systems.Her academic interests include multi-stage stochastic optimization, game theory, and the modeling of strategic behavior in dynamic environments. In the context of cybersecurity, she is particularly interested in adversarial decision-making, risk-aware resource allocation, and the design of resilient systems that account for uncertainty and strategic threats. Her work aims to bridge theoretical advances in optimization and game theory with practical applications in security, infrastructure protection, and data-driven decision support.Pragathi brings a strong foundation in quantitative methods and is committed to advancing research that is both mathematically rigorous and operationally impactful. Through her work, she seeks to contribute to the development of robust, scalable frameworks for analyzing and mitigating risks in complex, high-stakes environments.

SummaryIn this episode, I'm joined by Büşra Coşkuner, a product management coach and trainer who helps teams move from project thinking to product thinking.We explore how she approaches product discovery and testing. From building zero-to-one products at Doodle to coaching teams across B2B and B2C environments, Büşra shares how to actually operationalize experimentation beyond just A/B tests.We also dig into how to test when you don't have much data, how to combine qualitative and quantitative insights, and why many teams get stuck thinking they're doing product work when they're really just managing tickets.If you're trying to build a stronger testing culture or just want to make better decisions this episode will challenge how you think about product metrics and experimentation.TakeawaysProduct transformation is a leadership decision - If leadership isn't backing the shift from projects to products, it won't happen, bottom-up enthusiasm isn't enough.Most “product orgs” aren't actually product orgs - Adopting Scrum and calling someone a product owner doesn't mean you're doing product, many teams are still just managing tickets.You can't test what you can't measure - Without proper data instrumentation, teams fall into a “build, build, build” loop instead of build–measure–learn.Metrics frameworks are a starting point, not the system - Pirate metrics (AARRR) or customer factory models help, but real insight comes from adapting them to your actual business model.Qualitative data is not optional - Quant tells you what is happening, qual tells you why. In low-data environments, qual becomes your primary signal.“No data” is usually an excuse - Even in B2B, you can extract directional insights, from sales teams, customer conversations, and patterns across feedback.A/B testing is over-indexed and often misused - Experimentation goes beyond A/B testing. Many teams default to it even when it's impractical or irrelevant.Sometimes building is the test - For low-risk features, the fastest way to learn is to ship and observe behavior, treat the release itself as the experiment.B2B testing requires creativity, not scale - From sales-assisted experiments to prototype validation and even WhatsApp groups, testing in small markets is possible if you rethink the approach.AI changes the cost of being wrong - When building becomes cheap, you don't always need heavy upfront validation, you can test the problem through the solution, as long as you're willing to kill what doesn't work.Guest LinksLinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/busra-coskuner/Website: https://busra.co/ If your leadership team is about to make a big strategic bet, the real risk usually isn't the idea, it's the assumptions behind it that haven't been surfaced yet. A Decision Sprint is a focused 6–12 week engagement where we extract, map, and test those risks so leaders can make a clear Commit, Correct, or Cut decision before major capital moves. Learn more or apply at precoil.com.

This episode features Dr Catriona Mayland (University of Sheffield, UK. Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK. Palliative Care Unit, University of Liverpool, UK).   What is already known on this topic? The disease trajectory for people with incurable head and neck cancer is unpredictable. This cancer subgroup has high healthcare utilisation even in the last months of life.   What this paper adds Patients, caregivers and healthcare professionals consistently reported systemic variability in healthcare experiences for those with incurable head and neck cancer. Improving access to symptom relieving medications, helping more with advocacy, and developing ways to improve caregivers' preparedness reflect areas for improvement across the disease trajectory. Information needs change over time, with initial overload, but then complexities relating to advance care planning developing later due to the unpredictable nature of the disease.   Implications for practice, theory or policy Solutions include cancer centres adopting more accessible, inclusive means of communication and providing patients and families with reliable contact points for key healthcare professionals. Developing strategies or interventions to improve caregivers' preparedness should incorporate both caregivers and relevant healthcare professionals to ensure the technical aspects of care can be addressed.   Full paper available from:     https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/02692163261416267   If you would like to record a podcast about your published (or accepted) Palliative Medicine paper, please contact Dr Amara Nwosu:  a.nwosu@lancaster.ac.uk

People will let AI be their therapist but not their partner, their assistant but not their manager. Gillian Katz of Hannah Grey VC joins Phillip and Brian to unpack the firm's newest Cultural Vibrations journal and the qualitative study behind it: a read on how people are actually negotiating AI's role in their lives, domain by domain, role by role; from anthropology to sommelier frameworks to Goodhart's Law. You Can Manage AI, but AI Can't Manage You Key Takeaways: People accept AI in almost every domain, but reject it in specific roles within them. Naming a cultural signal may be what stops it from moving. Qualitative research captures what dashboard culture flattens. The next frontier isn't the technology, it's the governance around it. Key Quotes: [00:11:04] "No one wants to be managed by a machine, but they're okay to sort of put control over one." — Gillian Katz [00:27:08] "It's exactly like the way you wish every person interacted. But if you did actually have that experience time and time again, you would be so frustrated." — Gillian Katz, on AI sycophancy [00:29:22] "We give people the benefit of the doubt, but we expect a hundred percent accuracy from AI." — Gillian Katz [00:40:56] "If you only use AI to go build your business, you're gonna lose the discernment that's required to actually use AI well in the first place." — Brian Lange In-Show Mentions: Learn more at hannahgrey.com Read the latest issue of Cultural Vibrations, featuring Brian Lange Associated Links: Check out Future Commerce on YouTube Check out Future Commerce Plus for exclusive content and save on merch and print Subscribe to Insiders and The Senses to read more about what we are witnessing in the commerce world Listen to our other episodes of Future Commerce Have any questions or comments about the show? Let us know on futurecommerce.com, or reach out to us on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, or LinkedIn. We love hearing from our listeners! Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

In this podcast, Simona Giorgi discusses her paper 'Seizures in children with Dravet syndrome in extreme heat: A qualitative study of parental perspectives'. The paper is available here: https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.70162   Follow DMCN on Podbean for more: https://dmcn.podbean.com/ ___ Watch DMCN Podcasts on YouTube: https://bit.ly/2ONCYiC __ DMCN Journal: Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology (DMCN) has defined the field of paediatric neurology and childhood-onset neurodisability for over 60 years. DMCN disseminates the latest clinical research results globally to enhance the care and improve the lives of disabled children and their families. DMCN Journal - https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/14698749 ___ Find us on Twitter! @mackeithpress - https://twitter.com/mackeithpress

Host David Johnson interviews Lakshmi Bondu, MDS, MPH, regarding her JMR article What Makes an Experience Positive in a Regulatory Complaint Management Process? A Qualitative Study.

This episode features Ehsan Ehsani, an investor at Crescendo Partners in New York and an adjunct professor at Columbia Business School. We discuss his book 'Finding Value in Numbers', in which Ehsan emphasizes the importance of building a personalized investment framework.—————————————Our conversation with Ehsan Ehsani was recorded on 9 March 2026.—————————————For more info about the podcast, make sure to follow us on X/Twitter. We love to hear your thoughts, so please rate and review us. And feel free to tell us about great authors, books, and investors. Thank you. /Eddie with team—————————————Episode Chapters(00:00) Intro by Eddie(00:46) Welcoming Ehsan (02:52) Introducing Ehsan's book ‘Finding Value in Numbers'(05:23) Foreword by Mario Gabelli(06:30) Part 1: Is the opportunity investable?(08:44) Part 2: Is the valuation attractive?(16:23) Part 3: Is there a path to profits?(18:21) Soft vs. hard catalysts(24:42) Part 4: Do we have a winning game plan?(26:07) System dynamics(31:21) Intangible value(33:40) Building your framework(35:06) Qualitative aspects – people(37:38) Ehsan's role at Crescendo Partners(40:45) Ehsan's work at Columbia Business School(42:16) Personal investing(44:50) Having a process vs. following it – RPF(49:52) Ehsan's reading suggestions(51:42) Writing ambitions(52:19) Concluding remarks—————————————Books MentionedFinding Value in Numbers – Ehsan EhsaniExpectations Investing – Alfred Rappaport & Michael MauboussinThe Power Broker – Robert CaroEndurance – Alfred LansingThe Essays of Warren Buffett – Lawrence Cunningham—————————————Companies MentionedGEGoogle (Alphabet)MetaAccentureMcKinseyEinride—————————————More on Ehsan EhsaniLinkedIn Newsletter ‘Value Hedgehog': https://www.linkedin.com/newsletters/7099112971280203776/Columbia Business School: https://business.columbia.edu/faculty/people/ehsan-ehsani—————————————About the PodcastIntro episode: https://www.redeye.se/podcast/investing-by-the-books/817383/0-intro-to-investing-by-the-books—————————————What is Investing by the Books?Investing by the Books was founded by Henrik Andersson, Bo Börtemark, Mats Larsson and Michael Persson. It has published hundreds of book reviews in the past 10 years and operates on a non-profit basis. Visit the website: http://www.investingbythebooks.com/Follow on Twitter/X: https://twitter.com/Investbythebook—————————————What is Redeye?Redeye is a research-centered boutique investment bank from Stockholm. Founded in 1999, Redeye cultivates investors through timeless knowledge, a humble attitude, and a strong focus on quality. Visit the website: https://www.redeye.se/Follow on Twitter/X: https://twitter.com/Redeye_—————————————DisclaimerNotice that the content in this podcast is not, and shall not be construed as investment advice. This information is meant to be informative and for general purposes only. For full disclaimer, visit Redeye.se

Dr. Marvette Lacy shares proven strategies to help doctoral students finish their qualitative proposals without burning out. She emphasizes mindset shifts, practical steps, and the importance of investing in support to achieve graduation goals. Finish Your Proposal Bundle: https://qualscholars.com/ Qual Scholars Community: https://qual-scholars.circle.so/ Qual Scholars' Instagram: https://instagram.com/qual_scholars/      

Mein Buch bestellen: Amazon DE: https://amzn.eu/d/02rVlFQM Thalia DE: https://tidd.ly/3MDloMK Thalia AT:  https://tidd.ly/4kJIfDg Orellfuessli CH: https://tidd.ly/4qKvGJ7   Herzlich willkommen zu einer neuen Podcast Folge. Hast du schon mein neues Programm? Nein? Hol es dir hier: DAS ERSTE DATE ➡️ https://www.menschmitwert.de/daserstedate All In Mega Bundle: https://copecart.com/shops/598c239c   -------- Discord-Kanal: https://discord.gg/Y7SW9Q2js6 Shirts und Pullis: https://menschmitwert.myspreadshop.de/

In this podcast, Marietta Kersalé discusses her paper 'Perspectives of young people with neuromotor disabilities on shared digital portals in paediatric rehabilitation: A descriptive–interpretive qualitative study'. The paper is available here: https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.70203   Follow DMCN on Podbean for more: https://dmcn.podbean.com/ ___ Watch DMCN Podcasts on YouTube: https://bit.ly/2ONCYiC __ DMCN Journal: Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology (DMCN) has defined the field of paediatric neurology and childhood-onset neurodisability for over 60 years. DMCN disseminates the latest clinical research results globally to enhance the care and improve the lives of disabled children and their families. DMCN Journal - https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/14698749 ___ Find us on Twitter! @mackeithpress - https://twitter.com/mackeithpress

Feeling like you can't do anything because you don't know where to start'—Parents' Perspectives of Barriers and Facilitators to Accessing Early Detection for Children at Risk of Cerebral PalsyAbstractBackground: Early detection of cerebral palsy (CP) risk is possible from 12 weeks corrected gestational age (CGA) using standardised assessments; however, up to half of children at risk are not referred early, missing out on early intervention. We investigated the barriers and facilitators to accessing early intervention from the perspective of parents of children who did not receive services by 6 months CGA.Methods: Parents of children with CP were invited to participate in qualitative semistructured interviews. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyse the data and develop themes.Results: Eight mothers of children who did not receive standardised screening participated in interviews, from which three themes, 'responding to delays', 'systemic barriers' and 'complexities of diagnosis', were developed from the data.Conclusions: Parents require more support to access and engage in early detection services; health system processes are difficult to navigate, and health professionals require education and training to recognise risk factors for CP in all health settings and refer promptly. Improving system processes, education and training and partnering early with parents to improve their experience when interacting with the health system may increase early engagement and optimise long-term outcomes for children at risk of CP and their families.Keywords: cerebral palsy; diagnosis; mothers; paediatrics; qualitative.Child: care, health and development (Open Access)https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40435382/

This episode highlights data from a qualitative substudy of the AV Access trial, a randomized controlled trial studying outcomes of older adults who are receiving hemodialysis with a central venous catheter.

Resource sector investor Erik Wetterling (a.k.a. The Hedgeless Horseman) shares insights about current conditions in gold and silver equities, market corrections, jurisdictional risk, and how he sizes positions. Erik shares his perspective of risk/reward set-ups and when he bets big on undervalued junior mining stocks. Furthermore, Erik discusses market psychology, volatility, some stock picks and what he looks for in a quality junior mining stock opportunity. 0:00 Intro 1:04 Market Correction After VRIC: Staying Fully Invested & Value Shuffling 2:46 Why Juniors Still Look Cheap: Patience, Boredom, and the ‘Wall of Worry' 4:23 Sentiment Whiplash: Buying Misery vs. Hot Metals Markets 7:21 Beyond Gold & Silver: Copper, Nickel, and Macro Uncertainty (AI, Economy) 9:39 How to Play Base Metals: Producers vs. Developers + The Importance of Teams 12:29 Conference Circuit: First Vancouver Trip, PDAC Plans, and Why Events Matter Again 15:11 PDAC Talk Preview: Psychology, Volatility, and Being Comfortable Looking Stupid 18:03 Filtering the Noise: Social Media, Discipline, and Holding a 2-Year Thesis 22:12 Technicals vs. Fundamentals: Charts as Entertainment, Position Size as the Real Tool 25:58 People Matter: Evaluating CEOs, Communication, and Execution Ability 27:03 Why ‘Good People' Beat ‘Hidden Gems' in Mining Investing 28:50 Due Diligence Shortcuts: Third-Party Validation & Knowing What Success Looks Like 29:43 Vision Matters: 1–3 Year Roadmaps and 10-Year Mine Plans 31:19 People vs. Project: When the Asset Speaks for Itself 33:32 Low-Maintenance, Long-Term Portfolios (and Why People Matter More Over Time) 34:42 Jurisdictional Risk Spotlight: Mexico After the Tragedy 38:22 Positioning Through Metal Cycles: Invest Like It's a Perpetual Bear Market 41:34 Concentration & Conviction: No Hard Rules on Position Size 45:01 Qualitative vs Quantitative Conviction: Choosing the Right Team Over ‘Cheap' Numbers 49:06 Top Pick Breakdown 51:32 Wrap-Up, Where to Follow Erik's website: https://www.thehedgelesshorseman.com/ Sign up for our free newsletter and receive interview transcripts, stock profiles and investment ideas: http://eepurl.com/cHxJ39 Mining Stock Education (MSE) offers informational content based on available data but it does not constitute investment, tax, or legal advice. It may not be appropriate for all situations or objectives. Readers and listeners should seek professional advice, make independent investigations and assessments before investing. MSE does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of its content and should not be solely relied upon for investment decisions. MSE and its owner may hold financial interests in the companies discussed and can trade such securities without notice. If you buy stock in a company featured on MSE, for your own protection, you should assume that it is MSE's owner personally selling you that stock. MSE is biased towards its advertising sponsors which make this platform possible. MSE is not liable for representations, warranties, or omissions in its content. By accessing MSE content, users agree that MSE and its affiliates bear no liability related to the information provided or the investment decisions you make. Full disclaimer: https://www.miningstockeducation.com/disclaimer/

How did telehealth reshape GP training in Australia? This study found it disrupted in-consultation learning, reduced feedback, and limited clinical exposure—highlighting the need for telehealth-specific training. #MedEd #Telehealth #GPTraining Read the accompanying article here: https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.70061Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Fathom was built on the assumption that transcription would become commoditized and generative models would steadily improve. Rather than training proprietary models, Richard focused on building the infrastructure around them and waiting for model capabilities to reach the right threshold.In this conversation, he explains why AI has made effort and impact harder to predict, and why that shifts product development from roadmap execution toward experimentation. He describes separating an exploratory AI team from core engineering, structuring that team to prototype and write specs, and expecting a meaningful portion of experiments not to work.Richard introduces his Jenga model for AI development, testing different models and use cases to find where resistance is lowest. He also discusses the operational realities of rapid model updates, hallucination rates, and what he calls the LLM treadmill.The discussion explores qualitative QA, organizational design, buy versus build decisions, and why leadership taste plays an increasingly important role as AI lowers the barrier to generating outputs.Key takeaways: Estimating effort and impact is becoming harderAs model capabilities improve quickly, features that require months today may take far less time in the near future. This makes traditional planning assumptions less stable.Product development increasingly resembles R&DWith shifting capabilities and uncertain outcomes, teams must experiment, prototype, and iterate rather than rely solely on long term roadmaps.Organizational structure must reflect experimentationSeparating exploratory AI work from core engineering can allow faster iteration while maintaining stability elsewhere.Rapid model updates create operational pressureFrequent improvements and changing performance levels can require teams to revisit and adjust features more often than in traditional software cycles.Qualitative judgment plays a larger roleAs AI lowers the cost of generating outputs, evaluating quality and deciding what to ship becomes increasingly important.Fathom: fathom.aiFathom LinkedIn: linkedin/company/fathom-video/Richard's LinkedIn: linkedin/in/rrwhite/00:00 Intro: Why AI Breaks Roadmaps00:19 Meet Richard White (Fathom AI)02:16 From Roadmaps to R&D04:49 Designing AI Teams for Speed07:11 The Jenga Model09:56 Failing 50% & AI Team Psychology13:40 LLMs as Interns & Anti-Planning21:01 QA, Data Pain & Developing Taste24:59 Executive Taste & Culture Rules27:20 Reacting to AI Waves28:50 Fathom's 4-Step Product Plan30:47 What New Models Unlock32:13 From Scribe to Second Brain40:32 Build vs Buy in AI45:32 The Debrief

Three-year Qualitative Study: A Life Was Changed by Dental TreatmentBy Today's RDH ResearchOriginal article published on Today's RDH: https://www.todaysrdh.com/three-year-qualitative-study-a-life-was-changed-by-dental-treatment/Need CE? Start earning CE credits today at ⁠⁠https://rdh.tv/ce⁠⁠ Get daily dental hygiene articles at ⁠⁠https://www.todaysrdh.com⁠⁠ Follow Today's RDH on Facebook: ⁠⁠https://www.facebook.com/TodaysRDH/⁠⁠Follow Kara RDH on Facebook: ⁠⁠https://www.facebook.com/DentalHygieneKaraRDH/⁠⁠Follow Kara RDH on Instagram: ⁠⁠https://www.instagram.com/kara_rdh/⁠

In This Episode of Business Lunch: Roland Frasier and Ryan Deiss discuss the evolving landscape of business in the age of AI, emphasizing the shift from task-oriented work to purpose driven services. They explore the implications of AI on job markets, the importance of customer experience, and strategies for business owners to adapt and thrive. The conversation highlights the need for businesses to focus on delivering value beyond mere tasks, ensuring they remain competitive in a rapidly changing environment.Chapters:00:00 Introduction to the Death of the Task Economy01:51 The Shift from Task to Purpose06:09 Understanding Jevons Paradox in AI12:42 Qualitative vs Quantitative Work20:47 Valuation and Purpose in Business25:10 Transforming Services with Purpose32:27 Customer Experience and the Future of ServicesConnect with me on social:TikTok: Check out my TikTok HereInstagram: Check out my Instagram HereFacebook: Check out my Facebook HereLinkedIn: Check out my LinkedIn HereSubscribe to my YouTube

What happens when a student/trainee has been involved in a serious patient safety event? The complexity of “what happens next” tells us a lot about how clinical learning environments are organized. Read the accompanying article here: https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.70026Digital Object Identifier (DOI)  

Due to the enormous QUANTITATIVE advantage held by the Soviet Union during the Cold War, US policy shifted to maximizing the QUALITATIVE advantages of Western technology when it came to weapon systems. And so the US Army built what was unquestionable the best tank in the world: The M1A1 Abrams, also known as The Beast due to its battlefield dominance. But that was 1980. So what now? Meet the M1E3. And baby, The Beast is Back!

In this insightful episode, we welcome Jason Rogers, Marketing Communications Manager at Noldus. Noldus is a leading provider of hardware and software solutions for behavioral research across various species. Jason shares how Noldus empowers researchers to improve data quality and make the world a better place. He discusses their global presence, diverse customer base, and the challenges of marketing to a niche scientific audience. Jason offers valuable insights on website lead generation, the importance of authenticity in marketing, and balancing global messaging. He also shares his unique journey from behavioral neuroscientist to marketer and provides advice for aspiring marketers.

In this episode of The Liquidity Event, AJ and Shane kick off the new year by breaking down why leaving New York to avoid taxes is far harder than many high earners expect. Using a recent New York Times article as a starting point, they explain how New York residency audits actually work, the difference between quantitative and qualitative tests, and why most people who try to leave the state ultimately fail. They then shift to OpenAI's decision to finally allow employees to donate equity to charity, why the move matters in the ongoing AI talent war, and how equity structure and tax timing play into charitable planning. The episode wraps with a deep dive into IPO scams, explaining how regulatory carveouts meant to encourage public listings instead enabled a wave of fraudulent foreign companies — and why retail investors are often the ones left holding the bag. Taxes, equity, audits, and a classic Reddit money question to close out the year. Key Timestamps (00:00) Welcome, New Year timing, and recording Episode 170 in December (02:00) New Year's plans, hosting fatigue, and seafood traditions (04:00) The grill disaster and calling an audible on a holiday party (06:50) Rich New Yorkers threatening to leave and why it's harder than it sounds (08:15) New York residency audits and the two tests you must pass (10:10) Qualitative residency rules: holidays, dogs, storage units, and intent (13:30) Why most people fail New York tax exit strategies (19:50) OpenAI allows employees to donate equity to charity (22:30) IPO scams, the JOBS Act, and why fake companies keep slipping through (26:45) Reddit question: what to do with $1.8M in liquid assets at a young age  

Send us a Positive Review!Series title: Mormon Faith Crisis—Progression, Not Pathology [Part I of III] The data is rolling in and Wow…if you want to know what's really on the hearts and minds of many active Latter-day Saints, this 3-part series is a GOLD MINE. Join Val and colleague Jeff Strong, prominent researcher on Mormon faith crisis as they begin to look at some of Jeff's team's large-scale surveys and in-depth interviews that detail how many active members quietly wrestle with internal conflict, misalignment, and a lack of belonging in their current LDS experience . Don't miss this intro to a fascinating series! Timestamps:00:00 Introduction and Welcome00:19 Guest Introduction: Jeff Strong01:00 Jeff's Support and Early Conversations01:37 Jeff's Background and Experience03:00 Clarifying Jeff's Professional and Research Credentials04:26 Research on Disaffiliation06:30 Personal Journey and Insights08:04 The Start of the Research Journey09:45 Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methods14:00 The Role of Culture in Missionary Experience16:30 Returning Home and Continuing the Research18:00 The Importance of Data in Understanding Faith Journeys20:00 The Demographic of Faithful Questioners23:30 Data Collection and Analysis25:00 Key Themes: Testimony, Community, and Belonging27:00 The Spectrum of Activity and Belief29:00 Conflict Among Active Members31:00 Exploring Discomfort in Church Culture35:22 Quantifying Discomfort and Belonging36:22 Comfort Levels with Church Culture37:25 Culture vs. Doctrine: A Real Example38:21 Personal vs. Cultural Priorities39:30 Tension in Cultural and Personal Priorities40:35 Navigating Faith Beyond Checklists42:00 Stages of Faith and Cultural Tension43:17 The Impact of Leadership and Tradition45:00 Orthodox vs. General Membership Comfort48:36 The Importance of Awareness and Inclusion51:00 Normalizing Faith Transitions53:00 The Role of Community in Faith Journeys56:36 Concluding Thoughts and Future DiscussionsSupport the showSupport the show Listen, Share, Rate & Review EPISODES Friday Episodes Annual Access $89 Friday Episodes Monthly Access $10 Valerie's Support & Processing Groups Gift a Scholarship Download Free Resources Visit our Website

This episode features Lily Man Lee Chan (School of Nursing, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR).   What is already known about the topic?   Progressive neurologic diseases involve complex, fluctuating symptoms and function decline. Palliative care aims to improve quality of life and symptom control. Access to palliative services is often limited to advanced disease stages or based on prognosis. Palliative care needs among people with progressive neurological diseases are understudied in Asian contexts.   What this paper adds? People with progressive neurological diseases experience significant palliative care needs related to physical, psychosocial, and spiritual concerns from the early stages of illness, highlighting the necessity of early palliative care based on individual needs rather than prognosis. Patients with progressive neurological diseases navigated complex psychospiritual distress, transitioning from negativity to life renegotiation by fostering acceptance, focusing on the present, and embracing a positive outlook despite ongoing disease progression and future uncertainties. Findings underscore the importance of adopting a person-centered holistic approach that incorporates psychospiritual support, suggesting a symptom-based palliative care approach.   Implications for practice, theory or policy Palliative care services should proactively assess and address the multidimensional needs of people with progressive neurological diseases from diagnosis onward, not only at advanced stages. Health professionals need to integrate psychospiritual care and facilitate timely, open conversations about future care preferences before cognitive decline occurs. Policy and service development should enable needs-based, flexible access to palliative care for people with progressive neurological diseases, and promote education for patients, families, and providers on the benefits of early palliative involvement.   Full paper available from:     https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/02692163251394908   If you would like to record a podcast about your published (or accepted) Palliative Medicine paper, please contact Dr Amara Nwosu:  a.nwosu@lancaster.ac.uk

Last week, I talked about building credibility by looking outside your organization for validation. External benchmarking, expert opinions, and industry recognition all help shift internal perception. But validation only works if people understand the actual value you're delivering. That brings us to today's topic: measuring and communicating UX success in ways that resonate with stakeholders.Because, unless you can demonstrate value clearly, the rest of the organization won't recognize it.Fortunately, decision makers across your company have an inherent need to improve the metrics they see. By establishing the right metrics, you'll influence their behavior. It's a weird phenomenon, but if you give people something to measure, they will want to improve that thing.Two ways to quantify successThere are basically two ways to demonstrate the benefit of what you're doing.Qualitative data can be incredibly powerful. A compelling story generates empathy among stakeholders in ways that raw numbers sometimes can't. Testimonials, videos, and user feedback help people understand the human impact of your work.But quantitative data is even more powerful because people believe in hard numbers in a way they don't believe anything else. Ideally, this data should tie to some kind of financial return for the organization.There is something about hard data and having hard numbers you can track that really resonates with people and makes them want to start moving that needle.Deciding on your metricsThe first step is to have metrics based around organizational goals. Right back at the beginning of this course, I talked about getting that company strategy and identifying the organizational goals. Now we need to translate those into something measurable.Depending on what kinds of products and digital services your organization offers will impact how you go about doing this. Essentially, you're taking the company objectives and translating those to the website, app, or digital service that you're running. For example, "increase revenue" might be a company goal for the year, so your website's role might be to generate more leads. Then you need to get specific about key performance indicators. What metric are we going to measure? Maybe we're measuring the number of people completing an online form or visiting a contact page. You need to make those metrics very tangible because otherwise, you can't track them easily.Vary your metricsHowever, be careful. Many organizations end up focusing on a single metric like conversion, which often ends up undermining their long-term success. For example, if you only care about conversion, you end up using pop-up overlays and attention-grabbing things, especially if you're thinking about conversion over the next quarter rather than longer term. You'll do anything to meet that target for that particular month. But what you're also doing is alienating people who won't come back because your website is hard to use or annoying.It's much better to have a variety of metrics that you measure rather than focusing on just one area so that you approach things in a more rounded way.I typically try to have metrics in three broad areas:Engagement metrics assess if users find your design delightful, if the content is interesting, and if it's relevant to their needs. You might put out a quarterly survey on the website or measure dwell time (although sometimes that can be a sign that people are lost on the website) or track how much of a video they watch.Usability metrics answer whether users can find answers to their questions and use features effectively. Periodic usability testing can bring those metrics in. You can measure things like task success rate, time to complete tasks, error rates, and the system usability scale I mentioned earlier.Conversion metrics show whether the right users take action on the site and what the financial value of those actions is. You've got the conversion rate, average order value, average lifetime value, number of repeat customers, and so on.Tie metrics to dollar valueThe most important thing is to try and tie these metrics to a dollar value if possible. Let me give you an example of how powerful this can be.I was at a restaurant called Pizza Express here in the UK. My wife and I were sitting there when the server came over to take our order. However, they took forever to input the order into an iPhone app. I glanced at my wife, who immediately rolled her eyes at me because she knew exactly what I was thinking. That the app had a bad user experience and needed improvement. The server went away, and my poor wife had to listen to me go on about how annoying these apps can be. I then became obsessed and ruined our lunch by starting some calculations.I calculated that if we could save 10 seconds per order, with about 350 orders placed per day in an average restaurant, that would save 58 minutes every day. Pizza Express is open about 364 days a year, meaning we could save 351 hours per year per restaurant. With 450 restaurants worldwide, that equates to nearly 158,000 hours that could be saved by fixing this app. According to ChatGPT, the average server in the UK earns about £9.90 per hour, so fixing the app could save the company over £1.5 million a year.Now, you might think I made up these numbers, and that would be the kind of feedback you'd get if you did something similar. You're right. People will say the numbers are made up, and yes, I did make them up. But it shows the potential. You can use that as a case to run a proof of concept project to work out the real cost savings. It's okay to make educated guesses, and the power of linking a usability or user experience problem to a financial value cannot be overstated. That is where you'll really get people's attention and begin to show the organization the value you can provide.If you want to make similar calculations, I've created a UX ROI calculator on my website that helps you work out the financial impact of UX improvements. Whether you're trying to increase your conversion rate, improve user retention and engagement, or boost productivity and efficiency, it walks you through the math and gives you numbers you can take to stakeholders.Report your successHowever, we can't just calculate these numbers. We also need to report them back. There are several techniques I use for demonstrating this value across the organization.I use storytelling quite a lot. Creating an engaging story that demonstrates how UX enhancements can address issues and achieve measurable business results. That's where your qualitative feedback becomes valuable because you've got all these stories of different users and their experiences. I could have just given you the hard numbers about the Pizza Express example, but by telling you how I ruined our lunch and alienated my wife, I made that story more interesting.I'm also a great fan of dashboards. Providing UX metrics in a dashboard will demonstrate how changes in the user experience help meet business objectives in a very tangible, visual way that people can instantly understand.I also produce impact reports either quarterly, half-yearly, or annually which report back to the organization about the impact that user experience changes have had on the long-term goals of the business.And then there are demos. Host demo days to showcase recent successes, what you changed, what it was like before and after, and the tangible difference that made.Reporting success is really an important part of the equation, and that means you need to be measuring success and tying that back to a financial benefit if you possibly can.Outie's AsideIf you're a freelancer or agency working with clients, demonstrating value becomes even more critical. Your client relationships depend on proving ROI.When you start a project, agree on the metrics you'll track upfront. Don't wait until the end to figure out how you'll demonstrate success. Build measurement into your proposal. If your client says "increase conversions," get specific about which conversions, by how much, and over what timeframe.Document the baseline before you start work. Take screenshots, record the current metrics, and note the user complaints. This gives you a clear before state to compare against.During the project, create a simple dashboard that your client can check anytime. Share wins as they happen. Don't save everything for the final report.When you're calculating potential value, be conservative. Underpromise and overdeliver. If your rough calculation suggests £100,000 in savings, present it as "potentially £50,000 or more." This protects you from overpromising while still showing meaningful impact.Finally, make your impact reports visual. Before-and-after screenshots, simple charts showing metric improvements, and short video clips of users struggling with the old design versus succeeding with the new one. These make your case far more compelling than a spreadsheet full of numbers.So that is it for this time. Next week, I'll wrap up this course with some final thoughts and a summary of everything we've covered. I'll pull together the key lessons and give you a framework for moving forward with confidence.

In this conversation, Dr. Lacy discusses the critical role of a well-structured literature review in research, particularly in qualitative studies. She emphasizes the common pitfalls researchers face in articulating their methods and the importance of clarity in data collection and analysis. Takeaways A solid literature review is foundational for research success. Many qualitative researchers struggle with articulating their methods. Reading others' work can lead to confusion rather than clarity. Understanding your own research needs is crucial before diving into literature. Qualitative research often lacks clear methodological descriptions. Researchers should focus on their unique data needs. The literature should inform, not dictate, your research direction. Clarity in research questions leads to better data collection. Avoid the trap of following trends without understanding them. Effective research requires a balance between literature and original thought.   Dissertation Information Qual Scholars Community: https://qual-scholars.circle.so/ 10 Pages In 2 Days Writing Retreat: https://qualscholars.com/10pages/ The Finish Your Dissertation Institute: https://qualscholars.com/theinstitute/  Qual Scholars Website: https://qualscholars.com/  Qual Scholars' Instagram: https://instagram.com/qual_scholars/ Book An Astrology Reading: https://www.qualscholars.com/offers/8q2V7xF3/checkout     

Podcast recorded at BELMAS conference

Overview Evelyn Eddy Shoop PMHNP-BC joins Psychedelics Today to share her journey from Division I athlete to psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner and psilocybin research participant. In this conversation, she explains how sports injuries, OCD, and intensive treatment led her into psychiatry and eventually into a psilocybin clinical trial at Yale. Her story weaves together lived experience, clinical training, and a call for more humane systems of care and better qualitative data in psychedelic science. Early Themes: Injury, OCD, and Choosing Psychiatry Early in the episode, Evelyn Eddy Shoop PMHNP-BC describes how multiple season ending injuries in college and serious mental health stressors in her family pushed her to rethink her life path. Originally pre vet, she stepped away from veterinary medicine after realizing she could not tolerate that environment. During a semester off for surgery and mental health, she completed intensive outpatient treatment and family therapy. That time showed her how powerful psychological work could be. It also reawakened a long standing curiosity about the brain, consciousness, and human experience. This led her to switch her major to psychology and later pursue psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner training at the University of Pennsylvania. At Penn, she felt supported academically and personally. Her interest in psychedelics grew as she realized that standard OCD treatments and high dose SSRIs were not giving her the level of functioning or happiness she knew was possible. Core Insights: Psilocybin Trials, Qualitative Data, and Clinical Skepticism In the middle of the episode, Eddy shares the story of finding a psilocybin trial on ClinicalTrials.gov just as she was about to start ketamine therapy. She received placebo first, then open label psilocybin, and describes the dosing day as one of the hardest days of her life, with benefits that emerged slowly over months through integration. She uses her experience to highlight why qualitative data matters. Numbers alone cannot capture the depth of a psychedelic journey or the slow unfolding of meaning over time. She argues that subjective stories, even difficult ones, are essential for clinicians, researchers, and policymakers. Key themes include: The central role of integration support in turning a crisis level session into lasting growth How trial environments on inpatient psychiatric units can feel like prison instead of healing spaces The limits of double blind placebo trials when participants become desperate for active treatment The need for more nuanced language around psychosis and psychedelic harms Eddy also addresses skepticism in psychiatry. Many providers fear substance induced psychosis and feel uneasy with medicines whose mechanisms are not fully understood. She suggests that more lived experience stories and careful education can help bridge that gap. Later Discussion and Takeaways In the later part of the episode, Eddy and Joe discuss harm reduction, ketamine risks, and how poorly designed systems can create harm even when the medicine itself is helpful. Eddy describes being treated as "just another psych patient" once the research team left for the day, including being denied basic comforts like headache relief after an emotionally intense session. She calls for: More humane hospital and research environments Required psychedelic education in psychiatric training Honest, nonjudgmental conversations about substance use with patients Stronger public education for students and festival communities Eddy also invites listeners in Wilmington, Delaware and nearby regions to connect if they need a psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner for psychedelic related research. She hopes to bring her lived experience and clinical skills into the emerging field as psilocybin and other treatments move toward approval. Frequently Asked Questions Who is Evelyn Eddy Shoop PMHNP-BC? She is a psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner trained at the University of Pennsylvania, a former Division I athlete, and a psilocybin trial participant who now advocates for more humane and data informed psychedelic care. What did Eddy learn from her psilocybin clinical trial experience? She learned that the hardest sessions can lead to deep change when integration support is strong and when there is time to unpack insights, rather than rushing to rate symptoms on a scale. Why does she care so much about qualitative data in psychedelic research? Eddy believes that numbers cannot capture the full human impact of psychedelic therapy. Stories show how people actually live with their disorders and integrate change, which is vital for ethical practice and policy. How does she view psychedelic harms and psychosis risk? She acknowledges real risks, especially for people with certain histories, but also notes that some psychotic experiences are not distressing. She calls for more precise language, better containers, and honest harm reduction education. What role does a psychiatric nurse practitioner like Evelyn play in psychedelic care? Practitioners like Evelyn can assess risk, prescribe within legal frameworks, provide preparation and integration, and help bridge the gap between traditional psychiatry and emerging psychedelic therapies. Psychedelic care is evolving fast, and this episode shows why voices like Evelyn Eddy Shoop PMHNP-BC are essential in the current psychedelic resurgence. Her blend of lived experience, clinical training, and critical thinking points toward a future where data and story, safety and possibility, can finally grow together.

Product marketing—marketing's favorite misunderstood stepchild or just expensive project management in disguise? Pranav Piyush (ex-Dropbox, ex-Bill, founder of Paramark) joins the crew to drop some inconvenient truths: most PMMs are stuck doing thankless work because nobody knows who actually runs the business. We're talking hypothesis-driven thinking, why talking to customers isn't optional, the statistical traps that make your research garbage, and why that rebrand probably won't save your pipeline. Also:The "HIPPO problem" destroying 90% of PMM effectivenessThe three data pitfalls that make your research worthless (cherry-picking is just the start)Why statistics courses should be mandatory for every marketerThe hypothesis-based approach that turns opinions into provable strategiesWhy measuring creative team productivity is a complete waste of timeThe incrementality blind spot: 99% of B2B orgs have no clue about their marketing ROIActivity metrics you should ignore vs. the engagement signals that actually matterIf you've ever felt like a glorified PowerPoint factory or wondered why your data never wins arguments, this episode will either validate your existence or make you question everything. Either way, you'll finally understand why the role exists in the first place.TIMESTAMPS:00:00 Introduction and Host Intros00:37 Introducing the Guest: Pranav Piyush00:46 Pranav's Background and Career Highlights01:25 Personal Anecdotes and Adventures02:40 Origins of the Podcast03:37 The Role of Product Marketers07:04 Challenges in Product Marketing17:40 The Importance of Data in Marketing24:00 Understanding Positioning and Messaging24:45 Qualitative vs Quantitative Research in Messaging25:04 The Role of Customer Research30:13 Activity Metrics: What Really Matters?34:29 Creative Work and Measurement37:31 The Importance of Incrementality43:58 Rebrands: Are They Worth It?47:11 Final Thoughts and Podcast PromotionSNOW NOTES:Pranav's LinkedIn ParamarkElena VernaStatistical significanceHosted by Ausha. See ausha.co/privacy-policy for more information.

Introduction: In this episode, we are joined by Molly Whiteside, a psychology student at Nottingham Trent University, to discuss her recent research report, "Am I Being Served?" which explores emotional exploitation in the hospitality industry. With lived experience in the field, Molly delves into the prevalence of economic and verbal exploitation, unsafe working conditions, and the lack of psychological safety faced by young employees. We explore the surprising and often shocking findings from her research, which combines quantitative and qualitative data to paint a vivid picture of the challenges faced by 16-25 year olds in the workplace. From unfair pay and a lack of job security to the gendered nature of harassment, this episode uncovers the root causes of these issues and offers practical advice for young people, managers, and the industry as a whole. Show Notes: Welcome and an Unexpected Question (00:09 - 05:25): We welcome Molly Whiteside to the podcast and kick things off with our signature unexpected question: "What kind of person makes a good seat companion on an aeroplane?". The Motivation Behind the Research (05:26 - 07:50): Molly explains what prompted her to research emotional exploitation in the hospitality industry, drawing from her personal experiences and observations of a lack of psychological safety in the workplace. Surprising Findings and Statistics (07:51 - 12:01): We dive into the most surprising findings from Molly's research, including the high prevalence of exploitation, with around 70% of people having experienced some form of it. We also discuss the demographic focus of the survey, which was on 16 to 25-year-olds. Qualitative vs. Quantitative Data (12:02 - 16:25): Molly breaks down the differences between what the numbers and the stories revealed. While quantitative data showed middle-of-the-road satisfaction with treatment, the qualitative data uncovered a wealth of personal experiences, particularly highlighting the different types of exploitation faced by women compared to men. Job Security, Pay, and Communication (16:26 - 19:56): We explore the statistics around job security, with 35% of participants feeling confident they wouldn't be unfairly dismissed, but 10% feeling the complete opposite. Molly also touches on the disconnect between employees feeling comfortable talking to colleagues but not managers. Recommendations for a Better Workplace (19:57 - 23:43): Molly offers actionable recommendations for young people, managers, and the hospitality industry as a whole. For young people, it's about education and knowing your rights. For employers, it's about creating psychological safety and not letting biases control employee treatment. For the industry, it's a call for more robust policies and training, especially in smaller businesses. What's Next for Molly? (23:44 - 26:12): Molly shares her exciting future plans, including her role in the "Women in Business" society, becoming a "Consent is Everything" workshop facilitator, and starting her own podcast aimed at students. Wrapping Up (26:13 - 28:00): We thank Molly for her invaluable contributions to the podcast and her work with us. Resources: Read the full research report, "Am I Being Served?": https://emotionatwork.co.uk/behind-the-smile-the-hidden-cost-of-hospitality-for-young-workers/ Contact Us: If you're looking to create a more psychologically safe and emotionally intelligent workplace, get in touch with us at hello@emotionatwork.co.uk. You can also connect with Molly here: https://www.linkedin.com/in/mollywhiteside/

Dr. Robin Carhart-Harris is a neuroscientist and professor of neurology and psychiatry at the University of California, San Francisco, where he leads the Psychedelics Division. He is internationally recognized for pioneering research on psychedelics, brain function, and mental health. His studies have revealed how substances like psilocybin and LSD can “reset” brain networks and offer therapeutic potential for conditions such as depression and anxiety. Dr. Carhart-Harris is a leading voice in the renaissance of psychedelic science, making groundbreaking neuroscience accessible to both scientific and public audiences.In our conversation we discuss:(00:00) Misunderstandings people have about psychedelics(02:27) Differentiating psychedelics from drugs like ketamine, MDMA(08:39) Why people group all drugs together(14:57) History of ancestral use of psychedelics(21:46) Visions or insights during dark retreat(23:17) Biohacks for psychedelic experiences without compounds(29:10) Natural vs synthetic psychedelics and effects(32:28) Albert Hoffman's discovery of LSD(37:45) Findings from legal LSD human studies(45:55) Comparing SSRIs and psychedelics for depression(46:27) Clarification on psilocybin as treatment(48:49) Qualitative vs quantitative measures in trials(51:34) No difference between SSRIs and psychedelics?(54:21) Hesitations about psychedelics despite effectiveness(54:56) Why clinicians hesitate to provide both options(58:04) Downsides of SSRIs versus psychedelics(1:03:46) Dependency risk of SSRIs vs psychedelics(1:07:49) Personality traits suited for SSRIs vs psychedelics(1:12:54) Microdosing versus single high psychedelic doses(1:14:48) Placebo or real effects of microdosing(1:18:57) Brian Johnson's blueprint and psychedelics(1:20:32) Psychedelics and potential longevity benefits(1:26:01) Key takeaway and misconception to forget(1:29:04) Where to follow for book updatesLearn more about Dr. Robin:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robin_Carhart-Harrishttps://profiles.ucsf.edu/robin.carhart-harris@CarhartharrislabWatch full episodes on: https://www.youtube.com/@seankimConnect on IG: https://instagram.com/heyseankim

Struggling with overloaded discussion guides in qualitative research? In this episode of Conversations for Research Rockstars, Kathryn Korostoff shares practical ways to handle clients, colleagues, and stakeholders who want to pack too much into a focus group or IDI guide. Learn how to: Keep discussion guides aligned with project objectives Push back—professionally—when feedback risks data quality Use strategies like pre-surveys, split guides, and online exercises to balance content Whether you're running focus groups or in-depth interviews, these tips will help protect data quality and keep your research process rock solid. Have you ever seen a Franken-guide? (Skip to 2:22) For adding interactivity to online focus groups and webcam IDIs, we can either use qualitative research platforms with built-in interactive features, or use Zoom (and similar video platforms) with integrated apps that add interactivity. Qualitative research platforms with built-in interactivity features: Recollective – Supports collage, drag-and-drop image tasks, ranking/sorting, polls.

Today, Trek launched a bike that's sure to spark debate in comments sections. It's called the CheckOut. It features a new 60 mm travel front suspension fork, courtesy of the RockShox Rudy XL, and 55 mm rear travel to match. It fits gravel-width cranks and has official clearance for up to 56 mm tyres (about a 29x2.25in).However, it's the design and testing of this bike that brings our fascination up to a boiling point. Trek published a white paper explaining how it used a rolling road with 3D motion capture, on bike sensors, and a metabolic mask to understand the benefits of having suspension on typical gravel terrain. We had questions.So with that, Alex Bedinghaus (Lead Design Engineer) and Kyle Russ (Analysis team) jumped on to geek out with Escape's Dave Rome. The conversation covers the design of the bike, what modern off-road efficiency testing looks like, why gravel bikes continue to go where mountain bikes have been, and plenty more.Meanwhile, head over to Escape Collective.com to see Dave Rome's early coverage of the new Check Out.Those on the free feed for Geek Warning get the first 25 minutes free. Meanwhile, members of Escape Collective get the whole thing, which frankly, includes the best parts.Time stamps:3:00 - Introductions6:00 - The design goal of the CheckOut10:00 - Why not a mountain bike?15:30 - Designing for bikepacking20:00 - Longer suspension and stack heights25:00 - Suspension layout versus Trek's IsoTrust27:00 - Testing explained (Escape Members Only from here on)35:00 - Body is a damper and a spring37:00 - Suspension versus bigger tyres44:00 - Measuring steering compensation49:00 - Qualitative versus quantitative data53:30 - Is smoother always faster?57:00 - CheckOut versus a gravel race bike

Welcome to the Health Marketing Collective, where strong leadership meets marketing excellence.In today's episode, Sara Payne is unpacking the real power—and challenge—of emotional storytelling in health marketing. Joined by Lindsey Wehking, Chief Investigative Strategy Officer at Nonfiction Research, their conversation dives deep into why most healthcare brands only scratch the surface when it comes to understanding their audience, and what it really takes to access the raw, honest emotional truths that resonate and drive behavioral change.Lindsey brings a wealth of experience leading immersive research projects that have inspired everything from new products to major media coverage and even new company divisions. Her team is known for uncovering lived realities in places most research never ventures: hospital bedsides, prisons, and subcultures across America. Together, Sarah and Lindsey challenge today's marketers to move past the clichés and limitations of “safe” storytelling and to courageously commit to connecting at a more vulnerable, human level.This episode explores both the philosophy and practical techniques of immersive research and emotional realism. Sarah and Lindsey discuss how brands can navigate workplace culture barriers, use ethnographic methods to build intimacy, and shift from universal-but-bland messages to powerful, specific truths that genuinely reflect their audience's lives. They share moving real-world examples—from fathers navigating shame and engagement, to women coping with sensation loss after mastectomy—and examine how these insights translate into marketing that drives impact.Thank you for being part of the Health Marketing Collective, where strong leadership meets marketing excellence. The future of healthcare depends on it.Key Takeaways:Emotional Storytelling Demands Courage and Commitment: True emotional storytelling requires brands to move beyond lip service and commit to revealing the messy, uncomfortable truths that define real human experience. Lindsey stresses that while many marketers talk about going deep, few are willing to break from professional norms and workplace safety to actually do so. Emotional realism doesn't mean being dark or depressing—but it does mean daring to ask, witness, and reflect the truths that make audiences feel truly seen.Immersive Research Uncovers Diary-Level Insights: Traditional market research often falls short because it relies on contrived environments—focus groups, phone interviews, scripted questions—where people rarely reveal their authentic selves. Nonfiction's immersive research, by contrast, seeks out “diary-level” insights by engaging with people directly in their environments, observing real experiences, and listening for confessions and contradictions. This approach provides unmatched depth, surfacing the complex emotions and idiosyncrasies that make people human.Specificity Drives Universal Resonance: A common marketing pitfall is trying to appeal to everyone with generic, “universal” messages. Lindsey argues that the opposite is true: It's only through deeply specific, nuanced stories that audiences can find themselves and connect on a meaningful level. Great advertising, like great literature, makes the universal accessible by starting with the particular—making even uncommon stories relatable.Mixing Quantitative and Qualitative for Maximum Impact: While immersive qualitative research delivers powerful, intimate insights, quantitative data is essential for validating those experiences at scale. Lindsey shares how Nonfiction's research for Axogen on post-mastectomy sensation loss combined real-world qualitative insights with large-scale quantitative surveys—resulting in compelling, statistically grounded storytelling that changed the conversation and enabled new marketing approaches.Emotional Realism in Action: From Fathers to Motherhood: The episode...

One of the big topics at the conference this summer was the use of large language models in the research process, especially in qualitative studies. We expand this discussion by asking: can qualitative research be automated—or augmented? Yes and no. Some of the advantages LLMs bring to the table are hard to ignore. LLMs can act as critical reviewers, as a consistency checker, as a provider of alternative perspectives on unstructured data, or to break path dependencies in the process of data analysis. They can also help find interesting outcomes that qualitative insights could explain. At the same time, the use of LLMs comes with thorny pitfalls. We know they are unreliable and hallucinate. And the output they create is… average at best. So if you use LLMs, make sure you are not using it for automation—do not lose touch with your craft or your data. Whatever tool you use, make sure you remain a virtuous scholar. Episode reading list Noblit, G. W., & Hare, R. D. (1988). Meta-Ethnography: Synthesising Qualitative Studies. Sage. Recker, J. (2021). Improving the State-Tracking Ability of Corona Dashboards. European Journal of Information Systems, 30(5), 476-495. Rynes, S., & Gephart Jr., R. P. (2004). Qualitative Research and the "Academy of Management Journal". Academy of Management Journal, 47(4), 454-462. Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation Of Cultures. Basic Books. Boland, R. J. (2001). The Tyranny of Space in Organizational Analysis. Information and Organization, 11(1), 3-23. Weber, R. (2004). Editor's Comments: The Rhetoric of Positivism Versus Interpretivism: A Personal View. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), iii-xii. Lehmann, J., Hukal, P., Recker, J., & Tumbas, S. (2025). Layering the Architecture of Digital Product Innovations: Firmware and Adapter Layers. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 26, . Lindberg, A., Berente, N., Howison, J., & Lyytinen, K. (2024). Discursive Modulation in Open Source Software: How Communities Shape Novelty and Complexity. MIS Quarterly, 48(4), 1395-1422. Ragin, C. C. (1987). The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. University of California Press. Goodhue, D. L., Lewis, W., & Thompson, R. L. (2012). Comparing PLS to Regression and LISREL: A Response to Marcoulides, Chin, and Saunders. MIS Quarterly, 36(3), 703-716. Goodhue, D. L., Lewis, W., & Thompson, R. L. (2007). Statistical Power in Analyzing Interaction Effects: Questioning the Advantage of PLS With Product Indicators. Information Systems Research, 18(2), 211-227.  

Want to help your clients grow revenue? We ask Heather Osgood, CEO of True Native Media, to share how Podcast Editors and Podcast Managers can work with sponsorships and advertising. Heather shares her expertise on what podcasters want from sponsorships, what works best to get a better ROI, and how podcast editors can work with agencies like True Native Media.Key learnings:The different types of podcast ads and which ones generate the most incomeHow to determine if a podcast is ready for sponsorships, and what to do if it's notTactical things to consider for managing sponsorships, such as tracking downloads and communicating with brandsHeather also touches on the importance of dynamic ad insertion, pixel tracking, and how to avoid ad overload. For more information, check out TrueNativeMedia.com or connect with Heather Osgood on LinkedIn.Key moments:(00:00) Heather Osgood from True Native Media(03:45) Expectations of Podcasters Regarding Sponsorships(06:07) The Role of Podcast Editors in Monetization(10:08) Download Numbers and Sponsorship Viability(12:49) Affiliate Ads as a Starting Point(16:29) Tracking Affiliate Performance(19:51) Qualitative vs. Quantitative Metrics in Sponsorships(24:01) Managing Sponsorships and Tracking SuccessResources mentioned in the show:Heather's Representative Agency: TrueNativeMedia.comHeather on LinkedIn (check out her URL): LinkedIn.com/in/podcastadvertising/About Heather Osgood:Heather is the Founder and CEO of True Native Media, a leading podcast representation agency that connects high-quality podcasts with major brands. With a background in radio and a focus on authentic brand partnerships, she's helped shape the future of podcast advertising. Heather is also the host of The Podcast Advertising Playbook and a frequent speaker at industry events like Podcast Movement and SXSW.Our EditorThis episode of the Podcast Editors Mastermind was edited by Alejandro Ramirez. You can find him on LinkedIn if you're interested in talking with him about editing your show.______________________________Tools we used:*Riverside.fm to RECORDWe used Riverside to record this episode and create marketing assets for the show. Their Ai editing tools saved about 3 hours of work and created the video version you'll find on YouTube.*WhisperTranscribe for SHOW NOTESWhisperTranscribe assisted in the crafting of this episode description. It probably saved me 30 minutes by providing a summary and a list of chapters. *Captivate.fm for our podcast MEDIA HOSTWe use Captivate to host the podcast. Captivate offers amazing features for a low monthly price, including full control of dynamic insertion, embedded chapters, and Blocks/Shortcodes to quickly add content to show notes (either static or dynamic!)*Use of the above affiliate links may earn us a commission, which is used to support the efforts of this show. Thank you in advance for your...

Send us a textIn this episode of the Private Practice Survival Guide Podcast, we explore how practice owners can effectively measure success through KPIs. Brandon breaks down both quantitative and qualitative key performance indicators and why both are essential for growth. We discuss how to build a KPI dashboard that makes tracking simple and actionable. You'll learn how to align your measurement tools with your practice goals. Welcome to Private Practice Survival Guide Podcast hosted by Brandon Seigel! Brandon Seigel, President of Wellness Works Management Partners, is an internationally known private practice consultant with over fifteen years of executive leadership experience. Seigel's book "The Private Practice Survival Guide" takes private practice entrepreneurs on a journey to unlocking key strategies for surviving―and thriving―in today's business environment. Now Brandon Seigel goes beyond the book and brings the same great tips, tricks, and anecdotes to improve your private practice in this companion podcast. Get In Touch With MePodcast Website: https://www.privatepracticesurvivalguide.com/LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/brandonseigel/Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/brandonseigel/https://wellnessworksmedicalbilling.com/Private Practice Survival Guide Book

Dr. Benjamin Hardy is an organizational psychologist, author, and speaker known for his work on the psychology of exponential growth and transformation. He has mastered a highly unique form of strategic psychology and is known for his ability to rapidly scale companies to seemingly impossible levels. The author of several books and cofounder of his rigorous scaling company, Scaling.com, Benjamin helps companies scale 10x or more within three years. His innovative psychological and strategic frameworks are unlike anything else in business right now and are seeking to disrupt both the fields of psychology and business. Benjamin and his wife Lauren have seven children and live in Orlando. Links The Science of Scaling: Grow Your Business Bigger and Faster Than You Think Possible Scaling.com/Audiobook Share your thoughts in the Leading Saints community Transcript coming soon Get 14-day access to the Core Leader Library Highlights Benjamin introduces the idea that setting ambitious goals can lead to more effective pathways for growth. He explains that when organizations aim for significantly higher targets—such as a tenfold increase in growth—they are compelled to streamline their efforts and eliminate unnecessary complexities. This principle is particularly relevant for church leaders who may feel constrained by traditional metrics of success. Benjamin emphasizes the importance of aligning daily actions with a higher purpose. He discusses the concept of "raising the floor," which refers to the necessity of letting go of lower standards and practices that no longer serve the organization's goals. By doing so, leaders can create a more focused and effective environment for achieving their objectives. The conversation also delves into the psychological aspects of goal-setting, highlighting how the future should shape present actions rather than being dictated by past performance. He shares a compelling story about an audacious missionary baptism goal and how adjusting adjusting and filtering ultimately achieved the goal—illustrating the power of high aspirations and the need for leaders to be willing to say no to less-impactful activities. Benjamin explores the challenges church leaders face in maintaining focus amidst competing priorities and discusses the tendency to add more initiatives rather than simplifying and prioritizing efforts. He encourages leaders to define clear, measurable goals that can guide their actions and decision-making processes, along with a call to embrace ambitious goals. By focusing on fewer, higher goals and raising their standards, leaders can unlock the potential within their wards and organizations, ultimately leading to greater success in their missions. 00:04:00 - Applying Scaling Principles to the Church 00:05:20 - The Goal Shapes the Path and System 00:05:50 - The Power of 10x Goals and Short Timelines 00:08:40 - Missionary Work as an Example of Scaling 00:10:50 - The Past and Future as Lenses for the Present 00:14:10 - Operating From the Goal, Not Toward It 00:14:40 - Raising the Floor and Saying No 00:15:30 - Blake's Missionary Experience and Filtering 00:19:40 - Overcoming the Influence of the Past in Organizations 00:21:50 - Simplicity vs. Complexity 00:23:10 - The Challenge of Too Many Goals in Church Councils 00:24:50 - Focusing on Key Priorities in Leadership 00:28:00 - Defining and Owning Roles in Church Leadership 00:28:50 - Understanding and Raising the Floor 00:31:30 - The Floor as a Standard of Accountability 00:33:30 - Avoiding Guilt from Too Many To-Dos 00:36:10 - Setting Clear, Numeric Goals 00:40:20 - The Future Shapes the Present 00:42:50 - Repentance and Reorienting Towards the Future 00:44:50 - Distancing from Past Self and Growth Mindset 00:48:50 - Measuring Impact and Qualitative vs. Quantitative Goals 00:53:00 - Accountability in Systems and Leadership

Seller Sessions Special Episode: Conversion Optimization Mastery with Andri Sadlak  

In this episode of The Data Minute, Peter is joined by Beezer Clarkson, Partner at Sapphire Ventures and co-host of the acclaimed Origins podcast, for a candid, rapid-fire look inside the minds of LPs, the realities of fundraising, and why venture isn't broken, but is being reshaped.They cover the biggest questions emerging managers are asking right now: How do you stand out in a market filled with sameness? Do mega-funds really distort early-stage deals? And how should GPs talk to LPs about secondaries, exits, and… failure? Beezer also dives into how newer GPs are using content, transparency, and AI tools to differentiate, and why Sapphire has taken a public voice when so many LPs have stayed quiet.If you've ever asked “What do LPs really care about?” or “How can I build enduring conviction with institutional investors?” — this episode has the answers.Subscribe to Carta's weekly Data Minute newsletter: https://carta.com/subscribe/data-newsletter-sign-up/Explore interactive startup and VC data, with Carta's Data Desk: https://carta.com/data-desk/Chapters:01:14 – Are mega-funds distorting early-stage VC?03:38 – Why nimble managers can win the best early deals05:04 – The myth of aiming for a “base hit” in venture06:57 – Will the best founders always land at the biggest funds?08:08 – Repeat founders vs first-timers in the AI age08:55 – Why Sapphire is still bullish on emerging managers09:28 – How LPs think about adding a new GP to their portfolio11:04 – Relationship inertia: it's not just about the numbers12:14 – The real reasons LPs don't shift allocations more13:36 – Why reporting is fundamentally harder in venture14:03 – Hidden strengths of today's emerging managers15:03 – Better reporting formats: from Notion pages to CEO videos16:24 – Reimagining the Annual General Meeting (AGM)18:18 – The risk of communicating only in failures19:53 – Self-regulating GPs: what long-term LPs really look for21:20 – Learning from anti-portfolio decisions23:49 – Qualitative qualities LPs remember: insight and differentiation25:33 – Generalist funds in an AI-driven market26:22 – How pattern recognition drives better decision-making28:15 – Scouting, accelerators, and thoughtful experimentation29:07 – Why it's gotten harder to stand out as a new manager30:17 – The liquidity crisis: is this the worst it's ever been?32:14 – Normalizing secondaries: opportunity or stigma?33:34 – Why secondaries are often still so uncomfortable36:52 – Founder secondaries and aligning incentives38:20 – Term sheet innovation and collaborative norm-setting39:39 – Is venture broken? Or just economically challenged?41:51 – The core issue: it's not innovation—it's liquidity42:43 – Why funding pathways must evolve for the long private cycle44:45 – What does professionalized venture look like post-2021?45:58 – What LPs can learn from participating in content47:12 – The unexpected upside of LP-led thought leadership49:16 – Content as a learning engine: why Sapphire shares publicly51:21 – Motivation, value, and the Origins podcast origin story52:31 – What going “above and beyond” looks like for today's GPsThis presentation contains general information only and eShares, Inc. dba Carta, Inc. (“Carta”) is not, by means of this publication, rendering accounting, business, financial, investment, legal, tax, or other professional advice or services, and is for informational purposes only.  This presentation is not a substitute for such professional advice or services nor should it be used as a basis for any decision or action that may affect your business or interests. © 2024 eShares, Inc., dba Carta, Inc. All rights reserved.

Though the steps involved in developing a good, evidence-based treatment plan are well documented on our podcast, what good is any of that hard work if the families you purport to use it with kinda, sorta hate your plan. Well, this week, rather than complaining about how unappreciated your procedures are, why not take a step back and ask yourself, “How can I better learn from families I work with what will meet their needs?” We take a run down to explore the ever-confusing and complex world of family services, take a qualitative look at social validity in treatment planning, and review some key contexts that spell the difference between a good plan and a plan that works. This episode is available for 1.0 CULTURAL (ETHICS) CEU. Articles discussed this episode: Russa, M.B., Matthews, A.L., & Owen-DeSchryver, J.S. (2015). Expanding supports to improve the lives of families of children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 17, 95-104. doi: 10.1177/1098300714532134 Moes, D.R. & Frea, W.D. Using family context to inform intervention planning for the treatment of a child with autism. (2000). Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 2, 40-46. doi: 10.1177/109830070000200 Guinness, K.E., Atkinson, R.S., & Feil, E.G. (2024). Evaluating social validity to inform intervention development: Qualitative analysis of caregiver interviews. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 17, 870-879. doi: 10.1007/s40617-023-00899-6 If you're interested in ordering CEs for listening to this episode, click here to go to the store page. You'll need to enter your name, BCBA #, and the two episode secret code words to complete the purchase. Email us at abainsidetrack@gmail.com for further assistance.

Spring has sprung on us with a bunch of freezing rain. So what better time than now to get set for a cozy crop of new podcasts for April. First up, as visit from our favorite mythical bunny with a grab bag of goodies in the form of new articles to discuss. Then finally wrap up our (winter!) Listener Choice episode with a tutorial on token economies before coming up with new ways to finish our paperwork and create meaningful family supports. Then, for patrons-only, our Spring Book Club looking at the female neurodivergent-supporting book, Divergent Mind. By the time you've listened to all of these episodes, the flowers will definitely be in bloom. Articles for April 2025 Hoppin' Down the Grab Bag Trail (Spring 2025 Grab Bag) Nevill, R.E., Crawford, M.F., Zarcone, J.R., Maquera, E., Rooker, G.W., Schmidt, J.D. (2024). A retrospective consecutive controlled case series analysis of the assessment and treatment of elopement in children with autism in an inpatient setting. Behavior Analysis in Practice. doi: 10.1007/s40617-024-00979-1 Santa Cruz, H. A. C.,  MIltenburger, R. G. & Baruni., R. R. (2024). Evaluating remote behavioral skills training of online gaming safety skills. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 17, 246-256. doi: 10.1007/s40617-023-00830-z Kelly-Sisken, S., Reeve, K. F., McPheters, C. J., Vladescu, J. C, Reeve, S. A., & Jennings, A. M. (2025). Comparing equivalence-based instruction to a PowerPoint video lecture to teach differential reinforcement descriptors to college students. Behavioral Interventions, 40, online first publication. doi: 10.1002/bin.70002 Tutorial: Token Economies (Spring 2025 Listener Choice) Ackerman, K. B., Samudre, M., & Allday, R. A. (2020). Practical components for getting the most from a token economy.Teaching Exceptional Children, 52(4), 242-249. doi: 10.1177/0040059919892022 Kazdin, A.E. (1982). The token economy: A decade later. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 15, 431-445. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1982.15-431. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1982.15-431 Degli Espinosa, F. & Hackenberg, T.D. (2024). Token economies: Evidence-based recommendations for practitioners. Behavioral Interventions. doi: 10.1002/bin.2051 You Forgot to Do Your Paperwork Luna, O. & Rapp, J.T. (2019). Using a checklist to increase objective session note writing: Preliminary results. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 12, 622-626. doi: 10.1007/s40617-018-00315-4 Halbur, M., Reidy, J., Kodak, T., Cowan, L., & Harman, M. (2024). Comparison of enhanced and standard data sheets on treatment fidelity and data collection for tact training. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 17, 533-543. doi: 10.1007/s40617-023-00869-y Brown, K.J. (2022). The use of a pictorially enhanced self-instruction packet ot improve weekly time sheet completion in an ABA clinic. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management. doi: 10.1080/01608061.2022.2063221 Family Supports and Contextualized Treatment Planning Russa, M.B., Matthews, A.L., & Owen-DeSchryver, J.S. (2015). Expanding supports to improve the lives of families of children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 17, 95-104. doi: 10.1177/1098300714532134 Moes, D.R. & Frea, W.D. Using family context to inform intervention planning for the treatment of a child with autism. (2000). Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 2, 40-46. doi: 10.1177/109830070000200 Guinness, K.E., Atkinson, R.S., & Feil, E.G. (2024). Evaluating social validity to inform intervention development: Qualitative analysis of caregiver interviews. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 17, 870-879. doi: 10.1007/s40617-023-00899-6 Divergent Mind Book Club (PATRONS ONLY) Nerenberg, J. (2020). Divergent mind: Thriving in a world that wasn't designed for you. Harper One.  

Noah Healy is a market designer and game theorist working on better economic systems. #financialsystem #blockchain #crypto ================ All Episodes can be found at www.thecryptopodcast.org   All about Roy / Brain Gym & Virtual Assistants at https://roycoughlan.com/ ------------------    About my Guest Noah Healy: Noah Healy is a market designer and game theorist working on better economic systems. After training in nuclear engineering he worked for tech startups at the peak of the dot com boom. Becoming fascinated by the mathematics of information and computation led to patent work on a better commodity market design. What we Discussed:   00:00 Who is Noah Healy 03:30 His Blockchain Journey 08:00 The Bitcoin failure issues 11:50 Coordisc 16:05 Stopping the Corruption 22:30 The Basic Economic Assumptions 24:00 Mathematical Foundations 26:05 The Solution 28:50 The Chaos of commodities from Wars 32:05 Qualitative arguments 34:30 What Happens to Speculators with a disaster 37:30 Regulations for the Commodities Markets 40:40 His Patent and his experience with the Patent Office 46:10 Time & money Suck from Government 49:15 The Difficulty of getting International Patents 55:10 What he need to make this work How to Contact Noah Healy : https://coordisc.com/ linkedin https://www.linkedin.com/in/noah-healy/ YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v8aOEcDV7MA   ------------------ All about Roy / Brain Gym & Virtual Assistants at ⁠https://roycoughlan.com/⁠  ___________________

Noah Healy is a market designer and game theorist working on better economic systems.#financialsystem #blockchain #crypto================All Episodes can be found at www.thecryptopodcast.org All about Roy / Brain Gym & Virtual Assistants athttps://roycoughlan.com/------------------   About my Guest Noah Healy:Noah Healy is a market designer and game theorist working on better economic systems. After training in nuclear engineering he worked for tech startups at the peak of the dot com boom. Becoming fascinated by the mathematics of information and computation led to patent work on a better commodity market design.What we Discussed: 00:00 Who is Noah Healy03:30 His Blockchain Journey08:00 The Bitcoin failure issues11:50 Coordisc16:05 Stopping the Corruption22:30 The Basic Economic Assumptions24:00 Mathematical Foundations26:05 The Solution28:50 The Chaos of commodities from Wars32:05 Qualitative arguments34:30 What Happens to Speculators with a disaster37:30 Regulations for the Commodities Markets40:40 His Patent and his experience with the Patent Office46:10 Time & money Suck from Government49:15 The Difficulty of getting International Patents55:10 What he need to make this workHow to Contact Noah Healy :https://coordisc.com/linkedin https://www.linkedin.com/in/noah-healy/YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v8aOEcDV7MA ------------------All about Roy / Brain Gym & Virtual Assistants at ⁠https://roycoughlan.com/⁠ ___________________

Noah Healy is a market designer and game theorist working on better economic systems.#financialsystem #blockchain #crypto================All Episodes can be found at www.thecryptopodcast.org All about Roy / Brain Gym & Virtual Assistants athttps://roycoughlan.com/------------------   About my Guest Noah Healy:Noah Healy is a market designer and game theorist working on better economic systems. After training in nuclear engineering he worked for tech startups at the peak of the dot com boom. Becoming fascinated by the mathematics of information and computation led to patent work on a better commodity market design.What we Discussed: 00:00 Who is Noah Healy03:30 His Blockchain Journey08:00 The Bitcoin failure issues11:50 Coordisc16:05 Stopping the Corruption22:30 The Basic Economic Assumptions24:00 Mathematical Foundations26:05 The Solution28:50 The Chaos of commodities from Wars32:05 Qualitative arguments34:30 What Happens to Speculators with a disaster37:30 Regulations for the Commodities Markets40:40 His Patent and his experience with the Patent Office46:10 Time & money Suck from Government49:15 The Difficulty of getting International Patents55:10 What he need to make this workHow to Contact Noah Healy :https://coordisc.com/linkedin https://www.linkedin.com/in/noah-healy/YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v8aOEcDV7MA ------------------All about Roy / Brain Gym & Virtual Assistants at ⁠https://roycoughlan.com/⁠ ___________________