Podcasts about johanssen

This week on Fat Science, Dr. Emily Cooper, Andrea Taylor, and Mark Wright answer listener questions from around the world about metabolic health. This mailbag episode explores widely-debated topics like “starvation mode,” weight loss plateaus, the relationship between metabolism and cognitive health, cannabis and metabolism, metabolic effects of liposuction, and the latest on GLP-1 medications.Key Takeaways:Dr. Cooper dispels myths around “starvation mode,” citing research on the long-term metabolic impact of dieting and caloric restriction.Weight loss plateaus are often misunderstood—Dr. Cooper explains the natural adaptations behind them and how to assess true progress.Metabolic health plays a major role in brain function, cognitive decline, depression, and dementia prevention.Cannabis affects metabolic pathways in complex ways, with regular use potentially causing negative metabolic effects.Liposuction can trigger metabolic rebound and rapid fat regain for some patients, especially when leptin levels are low.Updates on GLP-1 meds: Liraglutide is available in generic form, but costs fluctuate. New oral and combination therapies are on the horizon.Personal Stories & Practical Advice:Andrea and Mark reflect on their own journeys with dieting, weight plateaus, and medication.Dr. Cooper shares clinical experiences with metabolic rebound after liposuction and ways to navigate pharmacologic treatments.Correction: Lilly has a lower cash pay for Medicare and Medicaid, but Novo Nordisk is not yet.References related to diet-induced metabolic adaptation, also called biological adaptation and defense of body weight. 1. Keys, A., Brozek, J., Henschel, A., Mickelsen, O., & Taylor, H. L. (1950). The Biology of Human Starvation. University of Minnesota Press.2. Dulloo, A. G. (2021). Physiology of weight regain: Lessons from the classic Minnesota Starvation Experiment on human body composition regulation. Obesity Reviews, 22, e13189.3. Müller, M. J., & Bosy-Westphal, A. (2013). Adaptive thermogenesis with weight loss in humans. Obesity, 21(2), 218-228.4. Rosenbaum, M., & Leibel, R. L. (2010). Adaptive thermogenesis in humans. International Journal of Obesity, 34(S1), S47-S55.5. Fothergill, E., Guo, J., Howard, L., Kerns, J. C., Knuth, N. D., Brychta, R., ... & Hall, K. D. (2016). Persistent metabolic adaptation 6 years after "The Biggest Loser" competition. Obesity, 24(8), 1612-1619.6. Johanssen, D. L., Knuth, N. D., Huizenga, R., Rood, J., Ravussin, E., & Hall, K. D. (2012). Metabolic slowing with massive weight loss despite preservation of fat-free mass. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 97(7), 2489-2496.7. Sumithran, P., Prendergast, L. A., Delbridge, E., Purcell, K., Shulkes, A., Kriketos, A., & Proietto, J. (2011). Long-term persistence of hormonal adaptations to weight loss. New England Journal of Medicine, 365(17), 1597-1604.8. MacLean, P. S., Bergouignan, A., Cornier, M. A., & Jackman, M. R. (2011). Biology's response to dieting: the impetus for weight regain. American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, 301(3), R581-R600Resources:Connect with Dr. Emily Cooper on LinkedIn.Connect with Mark Wright on LinkedIn.Connect with Andrea Taylor on Instagram.Fat Science is a podcast on a mission to explain where our fat really comes from and why it won't go and stay away. We are committed to creating a world where people are empowered with accurate information about metabolism and recognize that fat isn't a failure. This podcast is for informational purposes only and is not intended to replace professional medical advice.If you have a question for Dr. Cooper, email us at info@diabesityinstitute.org or dr.c@fatsciencepodcast.com.Fat Science is supported by the non-profit Diabesity Institute which is on a mission to increase access to effective, science-based medical care for those suffering from or at risk for diabesity. https://diabesityresearchfoundation.org/

Dame Lydia Ko has her first shot at a career grand slam this weekend and Rowing NZ has launched an independent inquiry into a recent US tour. 

Dana discusses the departure this week of Yachting NZ's long-time CEO David Abercrombie, the race for broadcast rights for NZ Rugby and a Kiwis star at centre of bidding war in the NRL

Would you have ever considered injection someone with mid-portion achilles tendinopathy 3 times in the space of 12 weeks? Johanssen et al (2022) did in todays paper and the results might surprise you! This is the closest we have come on having genuinely different views on a paper and was a fun conversation! Please note, this episode does not constitute medical advice.

Polo Ramírez comentó la actualidad. En Ruta Silvestre, conversó con Nicolás Johanssen y Lauren Tininenko, deportistas y creadores de Chileman16. Además, habló con el periodista Pablo Soto, sobre su nuevo libro Improbables.

The 37th America's Cup match gets underway this weekend, with defenders Team New Zealand taking on Ineos Brittania in the best-of-13 series. 

On this week's bonus episode Ophira chats with the hilarious Jake Johanssen about dropping his 19-year-old daughter off at college in Dublin, Ireland and his love of the Flowbee.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Players will be kitted out with new technology as Super Rugby Pacific kicks off tonight. Smart mouthguards will monitor head impact events, so doctors can identify who needs further assessment. And the battle between High Performance Sport NZ and the Mahe Drysdale-led Athletes' Cooperative is headed to the Employment Court. HPSNZ indicated this week it will appeal an ERA decision allowing New Zealand's top rowers and cyclists to engage in collective bargaining.

Polo Ramírez conversó con el atleta, Nicolás Johanssen, sobre su nuevo desafío Chileman16, donde debe completar 16 triatlones en Chile en 2 meses. Además, estuvo con el escritor nacional, Diego Zúñiga, quien se refirió a su nuevo libro, Tierra de Campeones, y de su pasión por las novelas.

I had the legend Alex Zahara for 5 minutes in front of the camera. What a time! Alex Zahara is a graduate of the Theatre Program at The University of British Columbia and has been a working actor for over 15 years. Based in Vancouver, Alex has over 100 credits in television and film and has appeared in numerous plays. Alex is a familiar face having guest starred in, Once Upon a Time as King Midas (recurring), Hell on Wheels, as Lt. Weston, (recurring) and as Dr. Renald in HORNS starring Daniel Radcliffe.  Alex can be seen as the handwriting analyst Eduardo Navarra in the Miramax feature, The 9th Life of Louis Drax, starring Jamie Dornan. Alex stars as Baron Von Awesome in the Nickelodeon comedy, SUCKERS. Alex also has a recurring role as Oberführer Oliver Diels in the much anticipated Amazon series, The Man In The High Castle, an adaptation of the Philip K. Dick novel.  Alex recently co-produced and starred in the feature Patterson's Wager, which won best Indie feature at the Winnipeg International Film Festival 2015 and won the Best Foreign Feature at the Big Island Film festival in Hawaii 2015. It was also featured in Variety Magazine.His varied screen credits include: A Viking in The Thirteenth Warrior, starring Antonio Banderas and Omar Sharif; a gunslinger in Open Range with Kevin Costner, A naval officer in 2012, directed by Roland Emmerich, a Swedish immigrant in the western Gunless, with Paul Gross; a detective in Fringe; a magician in Supernatural; and Lex Luthor's head scientist in Smallville. The credit Alex is most proud of, is his role as Karl Rademacher, in The Outer Limits episode “Tribunal” (based on holocaust survivor Leo Egan's life) where Alex played the real life Nazi officer who ran the barracks of Auschwitz.A familiar face to sci-fi fans, Alex has also appeared as 8 different characters on Stargate SG-1, more than any other actor, most of them in full prosthetic makeup. He's also known for portraying “Dulann” the lead Minbari warrior monk who serves as first officer aboard the starship Liandra in the Sci-Fi Channel's movie, Babylon 5 The Legend of The Rangers: To Live and Die in Starlight. Alex has also made guest appearances as "Johanssen" in James Cameron's Dark Angel (Red, Rising), Andromeda (Music of a Distant Drum), The Immortal (Forest for the Trees), Welcome to Paradox (Blue Champagne) and First Wave (The Purge).Alex also has many animation and video game credits including a number of commercials and industrial voice-overs: Gundam 00, Nana, The Girl Who Leapt Through Time, Iron Man: The Armored Adventures and The Roswell Conspiracies, Telus, Canfor, The Source and others.Alex has also received awards as a Producer for Patterson's Wager for best indie feature and foreign feature in Winnipeg and The Big Island Hawaii, a Leo nomination for Best Actor in the short film Evirati and Jessie Richardson nominations for his work in the plays Mojo (Ensemble) and The Promised Land (Lead Actor) winning a Best Ensemble Jessie Award for Mojo.

The CEO of one of the Warriors major sponsors has created a bit of a stir, Dana breaks down the brouhaha, and also looks at why netball bosses have been slow to address safety concerns in the game. Dana Johannsen is Stuff's National Correspondent specialising in sport.

This week we are thrilled to bring you another special live episode recorded at the world famous Hollywood Improv.Our guest is the truly inimitable comic genius Jake Johannsen. And a special thanks to the crew at the Improv who made this event possible. To get more of Jake's content, check him out here:Website: http://www.jakethis.com/Instagram:https://instagram.com/jakethis?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y=Twitter:https://twitter.com/jakethis?s=21&t=AI3cq9dOOxwtUrVNUObF5gFacebook:https://m.facebook.com/search_results/?q=jake+johannsen

As organisers marked 100 days until the FIFA World Cup this week, alarm bells are ringing in the Football Ferns camp, Brendon McCullum lands himself in hot water, and the resurgence of one of netball's most perplexing talents. Dana Johannsen is Stuff's National Correspondent specialising in sport.

Todd Ogasawara is joined by frequent guest panelists Sven Johannsen and Don Sorcinelli for this podcast. They discussed the new Communities for Microsoft Teams, expecting iPadOS 16.2 sometime this week, Apple's iPad app of 2022 - GoodNotes 5, the EU forcing Apple to use USB-C to charge all their devices, Sunbird Messaging's attempt to resolve the green vs. blue messaging bubbles war - part of the long line tech zealots brand/platform arguments.

Tause og ironiske vestlendinger skriver annerledes enn pratsomme og dumsnille østlendinger. I denne episoden diskuterer Marie Aubert fra Fetsund og Olaug Nilssen fra Solheimsdalen om litteratur fra Østlandet og Vestlandet kan settes i bås. I podkasten Olaug og Aubert på Litteraturhuset møtes forfatterne Olaug Nilssen og Marie Aubert for å snakke om bøker de liker. I subjektiv bokklubb-stil snakker de om blant annet romankarakterer, ungdom i litteraturen og å skrive om eller med musikk. Podkasten er produsert for Stiftelsen Litteraturhuset i 2022Vignett ved Hans Kristen HyrveCoverfoto Kristin Svanæs-SootLeseliste for denne episoden:Gjestene av Agnes Ravatn, Samlaget (2022)Tyl av Finn Tokvam, Halvor Folgerø, Samlaget (2005)Lavterskeltilbud av Jens M. Johanssen, Tiden (2019)Sveve over vatna av Ragnar Hovland, Samlaget (1982)Vestlandet av Erlend O. Nødtvedt, Aschehoug (2017)Diskursteori for barn og fulle folk av Atle Berge, Samlaget (2022)Mitt Abruzzo av Per Petterson, Oktober (2021)Det er her du har venna dine av Kyrre Andreassen, Gyldendal (1997)Vi er fem av Matias Faldbakken, Oktober (2019)Skyskraperengler av Tove Nilsen, J.W. Cappelens Forlag (1982)Elsi Lund-trilogien av Bjørg Vik (1988-1994) Alt er mitt av Ruth Lillegraven Kagge (2018) Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

The boys are joined by former Washington Tight End Rick Doc Walker to get his opinion on the $100k Fine, Warren Sapp, and Terry Mclaurins absence. Then we're joined by Ken Johannsen of Riggos Rag to answer fan questions!Getting Off Course PodcastThe golf world is filled with colorful characters. This podcast highlights their stories.Listen on: Apple Podcasts SpotifySupport the show

In his new book Fantasy, Online Misogyny and the Manosphere: Male Bodies of Dis/Inhibition (Routledge, 2021), Jacob Johanssen takes us on a journey into the dark masculinist recesses of the internet. He analyses original data from online communities of Involuntary Celibate (Incel) men, women-denigrating “Men Going Their Own Way”, anti-porn crusading NoFap users and the manifestos of mass shooters. By making use of the work of Willhelm Reich, Elisabeth Young-Bruehl and Klaus Theweleit, he is able to construct a convincing and sinister portrait of this dis/inhibited online culture, in which intermingling fantasies of victimhood and destructive annihilation of the feminine Other create a seething mélange of hatred and misogyny. It is testament to the power of the psychoanalytically informed approach of gathering “identificatory knowledge” that Johanssen does not stop at painting a damning picture of these men, but tries to grasp the psychodynamics at play in their polarized and fragmented world views and identities. As unlikely as it seems, there is even a glimmer of hope at the end of the book. Johanssen applies Jessica Benjamin's concept of recognition to the men discussed - a possible way out of the dead end of the obsessively intensified hate of the manosphere? We discuss this question and many more in the interview. Sebastian Thrul is a psychiatrist and psychoanalyst in training in Germany and Switzerland. He can be reached at sebastian.thrul@gmx.de. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In his new book Fantasy, Online Misogyny and the Manosphere: Male Bodies of Dis/Inhibition (Routledge, 2021), Jacob Johanssen takes us on a journey into the dark masculinist recesses of the internet. He analyses original data from online communities of Involuntary Celibate (Incel) men, women-denigrating “Men Going Their Own Way”, anti-porn crusading NoFap users and the manifestos of mass shooters. By making use of the work of Willhelm Reich, Elisabeth Young-Bruehl and Klaus Theweleit, he is able to construct a convincing and sinister portrait of this dis/inhibited online culture, in which intermingling fantasies of victimhood and destructive annihilation of the feminine Other create a seething mélange of hatred and misogyny. It is testament to the power of the psychoanalytically informed approach of gathering “identificatory knowledge” that Johanssen does not stop at painting a damning picture of these men, but tries to grasp the psychodynamics at play in their polarized and fragmented world views and identities. As unlikely as it seems, there is even a glimmer of hope at the end of the book. Johanssen applies Jessica Benjamin's concept of recognition to the men discussed - a possible way out of the dead end of the obsessively intensified hate of the manosphere? We discuss this question and many more in the interview. Sebastian Thrul is a psychiatrist and psychoanalyst in training in Germany and Switzerland. He can be reached at sebastian.thrul@gmx.de. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/psychology

In his new book Fantasy, Online Misogyny and the Manosphere: Male Bodies of Dis/Inhibition (Routledge, 2021), Jacob Johanssen takes us on a journey into the dark masculinist recesses of the internet. He analyses original data from online communities of Involuntary Celibate (Incel) men, women-denigrating “Men Going Their Own Way”, anti-porn crusading NoFap users and the manifestos of mass shooters. By making use of the work of Willhelm Reich, Elisabeth Young-Bruehl and Klaus Theweleit, he is able to construct a convincing and sinister portrait of this dis/inhibited online culture, in which intermingling fantasies of victimhood and destructive annihilation of the feminine Other create a seething mélange of hatred and misogyny. It is testament to the power of the psychoanalytically informed approach of gathering “identificatory knowledge” that Johanssen does not stop at painting a damning picture of these men, but tries to grasp the psychodynamics at play in their polarized and fragmented world views and identities. As unlikely as it seems, there is even a glimmer of hope at the end of the book. Johanssen applies Jessica Benjamin's concept of recognition to the men discussed - a possible way out of the dead end of the obsessively intensified hate of the manosphere? We discuss this question and many more in the interview. Sebastian Thrul is a psychiatrist and psychoanalyst in training in Germany and Switzerland. He can be reached at sebastian.thrul@gmx.de. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/sociology

In his new book Fantasy, Online Misogyny and the Manosphere: Male Bodies of Dis/Inhibition (Routledge, 2021), Jacob Johanssen takes us on a journey into the dark masculinist recesses of the internet. He analyses original data from online communities of Involuntary Celibate (Incel) men, women-denigrating “Men Going Their Own Way”, anti-porn crusading NoFap users and the manifestos of mass shooters. By making use of the work of Willhelm Reich, Elisabeth Young-Bruehl and Klaus Theweleit, he is able to construct a convincing and sinister portrait of this dis/inhibited online culture, in which intermingling fantasies of victimhood and destructive annihilation of the feminine Other create a seething mélange of hatred and misogyny. It is testament to the power of the psychoanalytically informed approach of gathering “identificatory knowledge” that Johanssen does not stop at painting a damning picture of these men, but tries to grasp the psychodynamics at play in their polarized and fragmented world views and identities. As unlikely as it seems, there is even a glimmer of hope at the end of the book. Johanssen applies Jessica Benjamin's concept of recognition to the men discussed - a possible way out of the dead end of the obsessively intensified hate of the manosphere? We discuss this question and many more in the interview. Sebastian Thrul is a psychiatrist and psychoanalyst in training in Germany and Switzerland. He can be reached at sebastian.thrul@gmx.de. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/science-technology-and-society

In his new book Fantasy, Online Misogyny and the Manosphere: Male Bodies of Dis/Inhibition (Routledge, 2021), Jacob Johanssen takes us on a journey into the dark masculinist recesses of the internet. He analyses original data from online communities of Involuntary Celibate (Incel) men, women-denigrating “Men Going Their Own Way”, anti-porn crusading NoFap users and the manifestos of mass shooters. By making use of the work of Willhelm Reich, Elisabeth Young-Bruehl and Klaus Theweleit, he is able to construct a convincing and sinister portrait of this dis/inhibited online culture, in which intermingling fantasies of victimhood and destructive annihilation of the feminine Other create a seething mélange of hatred and misogyny. It is testament to the power of the psychoanalytically informed approach of gathering “identificatory knowledge” that Johanssen does not stop at painting a damning picture of these men, but tries to grasp the psychodynamics at play in their polarized and fragmented world views and identities. As unlikely as it seems, there is even a glimmer of hope at the end of the book. Johanssen applies Jessica Benjamin's concept of recognition to the men discussed - a possible way out of the dead end of the obsessively intensified hate of the manosphere? We discuss this question and many more in the interview. Sebastian Thrul is a psychiatrist and psychoanalyst in training in Germany and Switzerland. He can be reached at sebastian.thrul@gmx.de. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/gender-studies

In his new book Fantasy, Online Misogyny and the Manosphere: Male Bodies of Dis/Inhibition (Routledge, 2021), Jacob Johanssen takes us on a journey into the dark masculinist recesses of the internet. He analyses original data from online communities of Involuntary Celibate (Incel) men, women-denigrating “Men Going Their Own Way”, anti-porn crusading NoFap users and the manifestos of mass shooters. By making use of the work of Willhelm Reich, Elisabeth Young-Bruehl and Klaus Theweleit, he is able to construct a convincing and sinister portrait of this dis/inhibited online culture, in which intermingling fantasies of victimhood and destructive annihilation of the feminine Other create a seething mélange of hatred and misogyny. It is testament to the power of the psychoanalytically informed approach of gathering “identificatory knowledge” that Johanssen does not stop at painting a damning picture of these men, but tries to grasp the psychodynamics at play in their polarized and fragmented world views and identities. As unlikely as it seems, there is even a glimmer of hope at the end of the book. Johanssen applies Jessica Benjamin's concept of recognition to the men discussed - a possible way out of the dead end of the obsessively intensified hate of the manosphere? We discuss this question and many more in the interview. Sebastian Thrul is a psychiatrist and psychoanalyst in training in Germany and Switzerland. He can be reached at sebastian.thrul@gmx.de. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/communications

In his new book Fantasy, Online Misogyny and the Manosphere: Male Bodies of Dis/Inhibition (Routledge, 2021), Jacob Johanssen takes us on a journey into the dark masculinist recesses of the internet. He analyses original data from online communities of Involuntary Celibate (Incel) men, women-denigrating “Men Going Their Own Way”, anti-porn crusading NoFap users and the manifestos of mass shooters. By making use of the work of Willhelm Reich, Elisabeth Young-Bruehl and Klaus Theweleit, he is able to construct a convincing and sinister portrait of this dis/inhibited online culture, in which intermingling fantasies of victimhood and destructive annihilation of the feminine Other create a seething mélange of hatred and misogyny. It is testament to the power of the psychoanalytically informed approach of gathering “identificatory knowledge” that Johanssen does not stop at painting a damning picture of these men, but tries to grasp the psychodynamics at play in their polarized and fragmented world views and identities. As unlikely as it seems, there is even a glimmer of hope at the end of the book. Johanssen applies Jessica Benjamin's concept of recognition to the men discussed - a possible way out of the dead end of the obsessively intensified hate of the manosphere? We discuss this question and many more in the interview. Sebastian Thrul is a psychiatrist and psychoanalyst in training in Germany and Switzerland. He can be reached at sebastian.thrul@gmx.de. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

In his new book Fantasy, Online Misogyny and the Manosphere: Male Bodies of Dis/Inhibition (Routledge, 2021), Jacob Johanssen takes us on a journey into the dark masculinist recesses of the internet. He analyses original data from online communities of Involuntary Celibate (Incel) men, women-denigrating “Men Going Their Own Way”, anti-porn crusading NoFap users and the manifestos of mass shooters. By making use of the work of Willhelm Reich, Elisabeth Young-Bruehl and Klaus Theweleit, he is able to construct a convincing and sinister portrait of this dis/inhibited online culture, in which intermingling fantasies of victimhood and destructive annihilation of the feminine Other create a seething mélange of hatred and misogyny. It is testament to the power of the psychoanalytically informed approach of gathering “identificatory knowledge” that Johanssen does not stop at painting a damning picture of these men, but tries to grasp the psychodynamics at play in their polarized and fragmented world views and identities. As unlikely as it seems, there is even a glimmer of hope at the end of the book. Johanssen applies Jessica Benjamin's concept of recognition to the men discussed - a possible way out of the dead end of the obsessively intensified hate of the manosphere? We discuss this question and many more in the interview. Sebastian Thrul is a psychiatrist and psychoanalyst in training in Germany and Switzerland. He can be reached at sebastian.thrul@gmx.de. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/psychoanalysis

Bergsteiger:innen, Freerider:innen, Alpinisten, Surfer:innen, sie alle reisen durch die Welt, sind trainiert und gut ernährt. Aber Anke Johanssen hat da etwas gefehlt. Was lässt man eigentlich in den Ländern? Eine Reise nach Kenia hat sie dazu gebracht, mit einem Freund KENIAL e.V. zu gründen. Gemeinsam mit Sportlern unterstütz der Verein Kinderhilfsprojekte überall auf der Welt. Ihr Mott: "Es ist Zeit, etwas zurück zu geben." Und mitmachen kann übrigens jeder, der gerne reist. Und wenn es nur das kleine Bergkissen ist, mit dem man ein Foto macht. Wie das funktioniert, erzählt Anke in diesem Gespräch.

It was Sophie Pascoe's final race in the pool last night and although she didn't win a medal in the 100m butterfly she has already cemented her place as New Zealand's most decorated paralympic athlete. These Games she has won 2 gold, a silver and a bronze. And the Football Ferns new coach is Czech-Kiwi Jitka Klimkova, the first woman to coach the team. Dana Johannsen is Stuff's National Correspondent specialising in sport.

Kristian Johanssen - Lørdag 28 August 2021 by Salem Stavanger

In this episode of “How To Survive the Modern World (or Gen X Isn’t Just A Fashion Statement)”, we dive deep into: Hard-hitting inspirational and motivational influencer Gary Vee (Vaynerchuk) Top 3 New Tech On the Horizon (Windows 11, Nanobots,...

Mr. Johanssen's stint as a supervillain didn't turn out too well, and now it's time to start a new business. He and Tassie are on the job, but they'll need Failure Crisp, and they'll need to think about lasagna as a way to marry your mouth. If you've ever leaked jewelry to the press, this one's for you!

Uli Mayer-Johanssen, Expertin für Visions- und Transformationsprozesse und Strategische Markenführung: "Es geht nicht darum anderen eine Botschaft hinzuhalten, sondern einen Denkraum zu eröffnen, indem er selbst erkennen kann ‚für mich sind andere Dinge wichtig"

Today I'm going to talk about H.P. Lovecraft, an author who is one of the great well-springs of the horror genre. And if you want tl/dr on the horror -- there's Poe then Lovecraft and then everybody else. I'm going to dive deep into two stories, Call of Cthulhu and Shadow Over Innsmouth. Shadow over Innsmouth is one of my favorites, but Cthulhu is really worth thinking about because it sparked the entire Mythos. In a nutshell here is how a Lovecraft story works. An Investigator seeks out secret knowledge.He finds truthWhich drives him mad.Someone is looking for trouble. Intellectual trouble, in fact. And they find truth, as much as they can understand, anyway. Which drives them mad in the end. Madness turns out to be the correct understanding of things. Because the Lovecraftian truth is a universe in which humanity is utterly insignificant. This is a very modern anxiety. We live in a time, the last 150-200 years or so when old belief systems have collapsed or are collapsing and nothing has replaced them. We don't have a good story of why we are here and what we are supposed to do. And every expansion of our knowledge in the physical sciences has pointed to our greater and greater irrelevance. The threat, the menace the thing that drives men mad -- the thing that dangles the thread that the investigators must follow deep into the maze of their own insanity -- is always one of the Great Old Ones. They are a pantheon of unpronouncables. Yog Sothoth, N'ylarlathotep, Azathoth, Shub-Niggurath, Ithaqua, Tsathoggua, Hastur (the Unspeakable) who, paradoxically, is the most speakable of all.Now, screenwriters like to talk about how important story is -- and it is -- if the story is broken in film, it doesn't work. That's because screenplays are blueprints. And if a blueprint doesn't work the house falls down. But a story or a novel is NOT a blueprint. It's the actual thing. It's a habitable structure constructed, not from light and sound, but from words and the creative response of the reader. So just outlining the story doesn't explain why Lovecraft is great. And that's why you should stick around for the rest of this video. Lovecraft is actually something like a prophet. He's not writing a saga. He's no poet. He's writing revelation -- wild and disturbing visions of how things really are, or could be. And it's at the level of the image that he succeeds. And why he's worth reading. And the thing that I get with Lovecraft, that I don't get anywhere else, is this lingering sense that madness is the correct understanding. Lovecraft doesn't scare me when I read him, not really. But Lovecraft scares me years later, when I see or hear something I don't understand and it suggests to me the hidden depths of chaos in which we all unwittingly dwell. And whatever other criticism you might level at the man and his writing -- lots of them are justified -- I don't know of anything else like that in literature.Lovecraft echoes through everybody who comes after him. And, as we will see, much of what came before him echoed through him. As the saying goes, "Good artists copy. Great artists steal."And, for me, it's tremendously worthwhile to go back to read the things that have inspired generations of people. I gain power as writer by going to the source of the river. But before we dive into the story we have to deal with two things. The Mythos and the Racism. They are tightly linked, and maybe not in the way that you think. The MythosSo, Lovecraft created what is known as the Cthulhu Mythos. It includes a pantheon of unpronouncables. Yog Sothoth, N'ylarlathotep, Azathoth, Shub-Niggurath, Ithaqua, Tsathoggua, Hastur (the Unspeakable) who, paradoxically, is the most speakable of these great old ones. The writers who wrote in this mythos after him started to take if very seriously, but Lovecraft didn't. He referred to it as "Yog Sothothery" (Jesus, Yog Sothothery! - it's like he made this whole thing up to troll dyslexics and people with speech impediments)The point is he didn't engage in obsessive "world-building". A term which I've always found to be a bit much, because if you scratch the surface of any fantasy "world" you will find an actual historical time/place/personage with dash of fresh paint and costume jewelry. At best you're mushing a few of those together. For example, Captain Kirk = Horatio Hornblower. And that's straight from the original pitch for Star Trek. And, in turn, Hornblower is based on Thomas Cochrane, the 10th Earl of Dundonald. Game of Thrones is the War of the Roses. Westeros is England. To become obsessed with the world or the mythos. Is to become distracted from the point of the stories. Nobody enjoys backstory, unless the backstory is also a great story. Don't believe me? I defy you to read The Silmarillion. In fact, I defy you to even skim the Wikipedia page without your eyes glossing over. But especially with Lovecraft, the Mythos isn't the point. It's how he conveys his point.The RacismAnd with Lovecraft, the racism isn't the point either. Oh, he was very racist. And I don't want to downplay it and disguise how very racist both he and the past were. I don't think it's good to downplay the colossal moral errors that things like slavery, racism, prejudice, tribalism, and bigotry really are. But, for Lovecraft, I don't see that racism is even a secondary concern in his stories. He uses the Other and the Unknown to display his primary concerns. And, whatever he felt personally, he's playing on the contemporary fears and stereotypes of his day to get the effect he wants. This isn't a justification, it's an explanation. And I can only observe, if you demand ideological purity and essential good hearteness from the artists you engage with, well, you are not going to get it. I mean, after you're done watching Mr. Rodgers and reading Neil Gaiman, who’s left? Saints are very rare. Good writers are also rare. And the intersection of the two is vanishingly small. For me, what Lovecraft seems to be worried about is two-fold:1) The universe is immensely vast and complicated and we don't matter in it at all. 2) The only thing that even somewhat protects us from this chaos is culture -- which is decaying and becoming corrupted. These two fears are quintessentially modern. Insignificance and lack of a grand narrative -- a structure of meaning - a myth to inhabit -- is our condition. And we're one of only a very few generations of humans that have lived like this. And I have to think it has something to do with the fact that 1 in 5 Americans are on antidepressants. And the CDC reports that 42.4% of Americans are obese. One way, or another, it seems an awful lot of anxiety is getting swallowed. And while I don’t thing the way Lovecraft uses race and the Other to symbolize degeneration and disintegration is appropriate, I have take #2 seriously. As Jung said, "Something we cannot see protects us from something we do not understand."And Lovecraft keenly felt the decay and collapse of that something we cannot see. You can partially track this as a collapse of the Church in the west. Tolkien felt this too in response to WWI. The old ways were shattered. In fact, the shock of this cultural change has created and inspired some of the greatest writers and thinkers of the 20th century. And whole philosophical movements, most notably existentialism. It's a valid concern. And it powers Lovecraft’s horror. To play cheap racist gotcha games with this, might signal virtue, and it is certainly right in places, but don't let it get in your way of understanding. Because all story uses one thing to symbolize another. And the question is: Do you use your symbols well or do you use them poorly?But still it's tough. Because yeah, you can read racism all over the place in his work. But Lovecraft is hugely influential and you can't pretend he doesn't exist. Lovecraft CountryI think author Mike Ruff did a great job of handling all of this, without slighting any of it, in his book Lovecraft Country ( I haven't seen the show). I really enjoyed the idea of the book and the book itself. It’s fine work. But I didn’t find it to be a Lovecraftian story. Nobody goes insane or dies and the character you become attached to survive and even triumph. Never happens in Lovecraft. It’s way more optimistic. But it is remarkable because it’s a horror tale told with the quintessentially American horror of slavery and racism. It’s also very interestingly structured, it's an interlinking series of short stories. Which is a form I really like and don’t know why we don’t see more of. Maybe Mike part of changing that. Anyway, you won’t go wrong if you check it out, but this video isn’t about Lovecraft Country, it’s about actual Lovecraft.Call of CthulhuThe story is like a Russian nesting doll. It’s told by Francis, but Francis does nothing but tells us the stories of Professor Angell, Inspector LeGrasse, and Mate Johansen. It’s a story within a story within a story. The best example of this kind of thing I find in Jorge Luis Borges the Argentinian Short story writer.— Who is truly amazing and 10x the writer Lovecraft was — he wrote these amazing stories within stories, and conveyed a depth of meaning even in the shortest of stories, that can be dizzying. And it turns out he was inspired, at least in part, by Lovecraft. And that’s the thing, Lovecraft inspired everybody as we shall see. This is the first line in the story.The most merciful thing in the world, I think, is the inability of the human mind to correlate all its contents. We live on a placid island of ignorance in the midst of black seas of infinity, and it was not meant that we should voyage far. The sciences, each straining in its own direction, have hitherto harmed us little; but someday the piecing together of dissociated knowledge will open up such terrifying vistas of reality, and of our frightful position therein, that we shall either go mad from the revelation or flee from the deadly light into the peace and safety of a new dark age.I could stop the video here because we’ve got all of it in the first sentence. An investigator of secret knowledge goes mad in the end because he’s learned too much about the truth of things. The start of the story is the death of Francis’ Great Uncle. Francis has to settle the estate. This would never fly today. And it’s strange that it worked in a pulp story. I mean really? It’s not very inciting. It really feels like the inciting incident in a tale called Adventures in Probate Court? But in that, there’s some horror too. Everyday, ordinary events lead people into madness. Now it seems like the old professor had a heart attack. But there is a weird hint here. …his passing at the age of ninety-two may be recalled by many. Locally, interest was intensified by the obscurity of the cause of death. The professor had been stricken whilst returning from the Newport boat; falling suddenly, as witnesses said, after having been jostled by a nautical-looking negro who had come from one of the queer dark courts on the precipitous hillside which formed a short cut from the waterfront to the deceased’s home in Williams Street. Physicians were unable to find any visible disorder but concluded after perplexed debate that some obscure lesion of the heart, induced by the brisk ascent of so steep a hill by so elderly a man, was responsible for the end. At the time I saw no reason to dissent from this dictum, but latterly I am inclined to wonder—and more than wonder.Francis allows that the professor was old so the most reasonable explanation is that his heart just gave out. But, at this point we do have two competing theories of death. Heart attack. The “Nautical-looking Negro” theory. Our narrator Francis dismisses the idea — at first. And that’s another feature of Lovecraft, his narrators argue for the most reasonable explanation, and when they fail in their argument, they go mad. So, Francis' Great Uncle Angell has died under mysterious or perhaps obvious circumstances and our man Francis leaps into action. Does he pursue this suspicious, nautical-looking negro? No. Because racism isn’t the point. Lovecraft is setting up a symbol to use later. At this point, even Francis doesn’t believe that there was anything untoward with his Great Uncle’s death when it happened. So he jumps right in and reads his uncle’s papers. Which is weird, because EVERY other thriller and detective story would have him chasing the murderer. And as he pursued the nefarious evildoer the story would unfold. But murder isn’t the point in this story. And neither is ACTION. Because in the second installment.HE READS MORE! But fear not, part three is where it gets really exciting for Francis. And by exciting I mean he stumbles across a newspaper clipping - reads it (obviously) goes to NZ finds nothing, Goes to Norway tracking a man named Johannsen, only to find that he’s already dead. This time the murder involves two Lascar sailors. And as Lascarii are Indian, we now have more nautical-looking brown people. Or brown-looking nautical people. Because after everything he’s read, and the strange cults he’s learned about, it’s all starting to fall into place. So now, having grasped the sinister outlines of the shadowy conspiracy, Francis, man of action, CONTINUES READING — he sits right down and reads Johannsen’s diary. And, at the end of all this reading, he’s left with marginal sanity at best.Who knows the end? What has risen may sink, and what has sunk may rise. Loathsomeness waits and dreams in the deep, and decay spreads over the tottering cities of men. A time will come—but I must not and cannot think! Let me pray that, if I do not survive this manuscript, my executors may put caution before audacity and see that it meets no other eye. So what we have is a guy who has uncovered knowledge. Written it all down. And now believes, because he knows too much, he will now be killed by a cult of sinister, degenerate nautical-looking foreigners, and DOESN’T WANT ANYBODY TO READ HIS STORY! What The Actual F’thgan? This is bizarre. On the surface, it seems, bad. Why is Lovecraft a thing? As we will see, in the second part of this series The Shadow Over Innsmouth is more conventionally structured story — and, I think, a better tale all around — but the structure isn’t what makes Lovecraft great. BECAUSE Lovecraft isn’t writing a thriller, he’s writing a revelation. Like a prophet. It’s apocalyptic literature. Not in the sense of the end of the world, but in the sense of the word we get apocalyptic from. The greek word Apocalupsis — which means an uncovering or a revelation. And Lovecraft stories, the truth is revealed to the characters — and the truth doesn’t set them free, it destroys them. He’s writing stories that work in part like religious texts, and this is especially true and easy to see with Call of Cthulhu since it’s not plotted like a conventional thriller. And the useful question to ask is, how does this oddly structured story pull the reader through it at all? What keeps someone interested?Because somehow it has to work. It was a serialized story, published in three consecutive issues of Weird Tales. So what makes us want to continue reading the story after the first part? Now, the answer could be “Because I heard Lovecraft was good” But that’s certainly wasn’t the answer this was first published.And what drives us here is not the interest in the murder of the Great Uncle, but in what the hell is going on below the surface of this story? Professor Angell must have employed a cutting bureau, for the number of extracts was tremendous and the sources scattered throughout the globe. Here was a nocturnal suicide in London, where a lone sleeper had leaped from a window after a shocking cry. Here likewise a rambling letter to the editor of a paper in South America, where a fanatic deduces a dire future from visions he has seen. A despatch from California describes a theosophist colony as donning white robes en masse for some “glorious fulfilment” which never arrives, whilst items from India speak guardedly of serious native unrest toward the end of March. Voodoo orgies multiply in Hayti, and African outposts report ominous mutterings. American officers in the Philippines find certain tribes bothersome about this time, and New York policemen are mobbed by hysterical Levantines on the night of March 22–23. The west of Ireland, too, is full of wild rumour and legendry, and a fantastic painter named Ardois-Bonnot hangs a blasphemous “Dream Landscape” in the Paris spring salon of 1926. And so numerous are the recorded troubles in insane asylums, that only a miracle can have stopped the medical fraternity from noting strange parallelisms and drawing mystified conclusions.How is this all connected? If this paragraph was a scene in a movie it would be straight conspiracy wall. Pictures, yarn, everything. And Francis’s story is merely the instrument of revelation. He’s John of Patmos. He’s receiving and relaying the message.And he’s skeptical. A weird bunch of cuttings, all told; and I can at this date scarcely envisage the callous rationalism with which I set them aside. But I was then convinced that young Wilcox had known of the older matters mentioned by the professor.He’s the character who, though he hints at awful things right from the word go, is skeptical enough to allow us access to this story. He allows the reasonable perspective and the simple answer the whole way through. Until he can’t anymore. So what does Francis read about that drives him nuts? Well, his uncle is obsessed with something called the Cthulhu Cult. And has been ever since a Police Inspector showed up an American Archeological Society meeting with a crazy statue. Described like thisIt represented a monster of vaguely anthropoid outline, but with an octopus-like head whose face was a mass of feelers, a scaly, rubbery-looking body, prodigious claws on hind and fore feet, and long, narrow wings behind. This thing, which seemed instinct with a fearsome and unnatural malignancy, was of a somewhat bloated corpulence, and squatted evilly on a rectangular block or pedestal covered with undecipherable characters. The aspect of the whole was abnormally life-like, and the more subtly fearful because its source was so totally unknown. Its vast, awesome, and incalculable age was unmistakable; yet not one link did it shew with any known type of art belonging to civilization’s youth—or indeed to any other time. Its very material was a mystery; for the soapy, greenish-black stone with its golden or iridescent flecks and striations resembled nothing familiar to geology or mineralogy. The characters along the base were equally baffling; and no member present, despite a representation of half the world’s expert learning in this field, could form the least notion of even their remotest linguistic kinship. They, like the subject and material, belonged to something horribly remote and distinct from mankind as we know it; something frightfully suggestive of old and unhallowed cycles of life in which our world and our conceptions have no part.So they ask the inspector, what is this thing. And where did it come from? So the Inspector tells a tale of raiding a strange cult in the swamps outside New Orleans. Including this -- In a natural glade of the swamp stood a grassy island of perhaps an acre’s extent, clear of trees and tolerably dry. On this now leaped and twisted a more indescribable horde of human abnormality than any but a Sime or an Angarola could paint. Void of clothing, this hybrid spawn were braying, bellowing, and writhing about a monstrous ring-shaped bonfire; in the centre of which, revealed by occasional rifts in the curtain of flame, stood a great granite monolith some eight feet in height; on top of which, incongruous with its diminutiveness, rested the noxious carven statuette. From a wide circle of ten scaffolds set up at regular intervals with the flame-girt monolith as a centre hung, head downward, the oddly marred bodies of the helpless squatters who had disappeared. It was inside this circle that the ring of worshippers jumped and roared, the general direction of the mass motion being from left to right in endless Bacchanal between the ring of bodies and the ring of fire.So good old Inspector LeGrasse hauls them down to the station. And learns all about the Great Old ones and Cthulhu. Including the meaning of this unpronouncable chant. “Ph’nglui mglw’nafh Cthulhu R’lyeh wgah’nagl fhtagn.”And the punchline to all of it?Only two of the prisoners were found sane enough to be hanged, and the rest were committed to various institutions.Which makes me (and the reader) want to know. What the hell is a cthuhlu anyway. And I don't mean within the context of the Cthuhlu Mythos. What I mean is what is this thing symbolically? Where did it come from? Why does it seem to resonate with everyone? The first answer I have is a poem called The Kraken, by TennysonBelow the thunders of the upper deep,Far, far beneath in the abysmal sea,His ancient, dreamless, uninvaded sleepThe Kraken sleepeth: faintest sunlights fleeAbout his shadowy sides; above him swellHuge sponges of millennial growth and height;And far away into the sickly light,From many a wondrous grot and secret cellUnnumbered and enormous polypiWinnow with giant arms the slumbering green.There hath he lain for ages, and will lieBattening upon huge sea worms in his sleep,Until the latter fire shall heat the deep;Then once by man and angels to be seen,In roaring he shall rise and on the surface die.Lovecraft sacked this poem like the Vandals and the Visigoths sacked Rome. The Kraken sleeps below the waters. Cthulhu sleeps below the waters. Tennyson even gives us polyps -- and, just like swimming in a swamp and getting leeches, you can't read very far in Lovecraft without getting polyps all over you. But the Kraken is a form of a much older water Dragon/sea serpent concept. In the Bible, we find it as Leviathan. This from the Book of the Prophet Isaiah Chapter 27 verse 1In that day the Lord will punish Leviathan the fleeing serpent,With His fierce and great and mighty sword,Even Leviathan the twisted serpent;And He will kill the dragon who lives in the sea.And this from Revelation Chapter 20 verse 2And he laid hold on the dragon, that old serpent, which is the Devil, and Satan, and bound him a thousand years, And cast him into the bottomless pit, and shut him up, and set a seal upon him, that he should deceive the nations no more, till the thousand years should be fulfilled: and after that he must be loosed a little season.And the threat of Cthulhu is that sooner or later, he's going to be loosed for a little season. But even before Leviathan, we have all kinds of Dragons who live in the sea. Jormungandr from Norse Mythology and Tiamat from the Enuma Elish -- the Babylonian Creation Epic. It's worth thinking of Lovecraft in Mythical terms, because I think that's where his stories really succeed -- at the level of the image. Using religious archetypes in strange new ways. In part three, Madness from the Sea, we get the story of Mate Johannsen — after he’s dead. So there’s zero suspense. R’yleh rises from the bottom of the ocean and they stumble across it. I suppose that only a single mountain-top, the hideous monolith-crowned citadel whereon great Cthulhu was buried, actually emerged from the waters. When I think of the extent of all that may be brooding down there I almost wish to kill myself forthwith.Johanssen survives this encounter by driving a ship through Cthulhu’s faceThe brave Norwegian drove his vessel head on against the pursuing jelly which rose above the unclean froth like the stern of a daemon galleon. The awful squid-head with writhing feelers came nearly up to the bowsprit of the sturdy yacht, but Johansen drove on relentlessly. There was a bursting as of an exploding bladder, a slushy nastiness as of a cloven sunfish, a stench as of a thousand opened graves, and a sound that the chronicler would not put on paper. For an instant the ship was befouled by an acrid and blinding green cloud, and then there was only a venomous seething astern; where—God in heaven!—the scattered plasticity of that nameless sky-spawn was nebulously recombining in its hateful original form, whilst its distance widened every second as the Alert gained impetus from its mounting steam.And then he goes mad. Which, in turn, drives Francis mad because he now knows what’s really going on. That was the document I read, and now I have placed it in the tin box beside the bas-relief and the papers of Professor Angell. With it shall go this record of mine—this test of my own sanity, wherein is pieced together that which I hope may never be pieced together again. I have looked upon all that the universe has to hold of horror, and even the skies of spring and the flowers of summer must ever afterward be poison to me. But I do not think my life will be long. As my uncle went, as poor Johansen went, so I shall go. I know too much, and the cult still lives.Cthulhu still lives, too, I suppose, again in that chasm of stone which has shielded him since the sun was young. His accursed city is sunken once more, for the Vigilant sailed over the spot after the April storm; but his ministers on earth still bellow and prance and slay around idol-capped monoliths in lonely places. He must have been trapped by the sinking whilst within his black abyss, or else the world would by now be screaming with fright and frenzy. Who knows the end? What has risen may sink, and what has sunk may rise. Loathsomeness waits and dreams in the deep, and decay spreads over the tottering cities of men. A time will come—but I must not and cannot think! Let me pray that, if I do not survive this manuscript, my executors may put caution before audacity and see that it meets no other eye.And that's it. Hardly even a story by modern standards of plot. Nothing happens to the main character. So why does this work? I see a couple of ways. One, this is more like a history channel show than a thriller. Secrets of the Ancient Egyptians. We found this crazy thing out. And then we found another crazy thing out. Could be on the verge of unlocking the lost secret of Tututkhamen? And you're drawn into the next part. It's informational suspense, rather than dramatic suspense. While we don't see this device much in fiction anymore, we see it all the time in non-fiction. And I've read some fantastic non-fiction books and listened to some great non-fiction podcasts that use this to propel you through the story. The second reason is the revelation. The true nature of the universe is revealed to the reader through Francis. And this kind of revelation story is strange to us now, because, in a way, things aren’t obscured in the same way. If this story happened now, wouldn't have to stumble on clippings to put it together, I could go to the USGS website and scrape earthquake data around the world to pinpoint where R’lyeh was, and exactly when it rose. And we'd probably have shaky cellphone video of the ship driving through Cthulhu's tentacle'd face. And somebody would have gotten the whole thing on an undersea survey, or a satellite photo. But the story and the revelation still work, because the underlying horror is our meaninglessness in the Universe. This is only more true, the more we can observe. I heard an interview with Neil De Grasse Tyson said, “Every new leap in understanding has made us less unique and less important in the universe.” And the interviewer asked, if you came across a theory that suggested that man was more important or unique than we think now. And with hesitation he said, I suspect it would be wrong. But in one sense it doesn’t matter what we think of this story of Lovecraft now. Call of Cthulhu rang people, and particularly, other writers like a bell.And I think this eerie, quasi-religious revelatory quality is the source of Lovecraft’s lasting impact. He gave people their myths and archetypes in a way they immediately recognize but yet manages to be totally new and speak to modern anxieties in a way nothing had before. He kicked off the conceptual driver of modern horror.The effect that Lovecraft has had upon imaginative fiction is immense. This story was the spark that set it off. Which is why it’s worth reading and studying. In part two of this series, I’m gong to look at the story where I think Lovecraft is at his absolute best — The Shadow Over Innsmouth. Get full access to How It's Written by Patrick E. McLean at patrickemclean.substack.com/subscribe

Geir Johanssen- Hans fotter paa bakken by Kveldsmøtet

Celebrity Sam In this episode: HEATHER MCDONALD'S JUICY SCOOP: heather drags ellendegenerate and anne heche. dancing with the old whoevers squeezed anne heche for gossip and threw her out after she opened up her juicebox, and heather scooped that juice right up. some bravo bs are here... with low humor. CHRIS FRANJOLA: peanuts? where are the sextoy reviews?????? the pure humor! WHO WEEKLY: comment episode. i cant. US WEEKLY: why are aliens wanting to abduct miley and demi? i mean why take those two talents? alien child tv acting? matthew mcconaughey was blackmailed, by a woman? or a man? or a trans woman? blackmailed into sex. i ask: anal sex? receiving? my favorite chris is chris rock. give him muscles and let's go. PEREZ HILTON and booker: perez says kyliejenner has corona, orange god trump has corona, cardi pardi party b has corona. doctor perez knows. CLEVVER: drags jusin bieber, he has no privacy. please. you still don't choose privacy... DLISTED: drags michael cera, cleopatra, and gal gadot. glal gladot? listen michael cera should absolutely play cleopatra. he must. why? who knows. i know, to prevent fake asian trees like scarlett johanssen from taking the role. gal gadooooot. WENDY WILLIAMS: wendy drags shonda rhimes. bill cosby. a pro tip: don't do old people anal, film it, and somebody leaks it. i cant take anythinfg from leslie jones, her old anal pics or her toilet rules. ew. RINGERDISH DISHRINGER: #prowoman thats all. plus drag tyrabanks. #whynot. - WEHEAR: missing in action _ WARNING. episode contains swear words _ ADS firefox - https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/new/ anti climate change - https://www.atmosfair.de/de/spenden _ LINKS https://anchor.fm/celebritysam WHO WEEKLY https://feeds.megaphone.fm/who-weekly US WEEKLY http://www.podcastone.com/podcast?categoryID2=1944 leather, sorry, HEATHER MCDONALD'S JUICY SCOOP: https://www.omnycontent.com/d/playlist/aaea4e69-af51-495e-afc9-a9760146922b/ff8beffb-1630-4cb7-b6ab-ab0500158cbf/6f7e32bf-0df0-4d48-b501-ab0500158cc4/podcast.rss HOLLYWOOD RAW https://hollywoodpipeline.libsyn.com/rss CRISS, SORRY, CHRIS FRANJOLA and... alex conn https://www.spreaker.com/show/3232200/episodes/feed PEREZ HILTON AND BOOKER: http://www.podcastone.com/podcast?categoryID2=1699 DLISTED https://dlisted.com/feed/podcast/ CELEBRITY SAM https://anchor.fm/s/3b4bbf3c/podcast/rss WE HEAR https://feeds.megaphone.fm/pagesix RINGERDISH wtf DINGALINGER DISHRINGER DINGDONGGIRLS RINGDINGDINGG https://rss.art19.com/ringer-dish WENDY WILLIAMS https://www.wendyshow.com _ Jokes of the week: US WEEKLY: why are aliens wanting to abduct miley and demi? i mean why take those two talents? alien child tv acting? matthew mcconaughey was blackmailed, by a woman? or a man? or a trans woman? blackmailed into sex. i ask: anal sex? receiving? my favorite chris is chris rock. give him muscles and let's go. PEREZ HILTON and booker: perez says kyliejenner has corona, orange god trump has corona, cardi pardi party b has corona. doctor perez knows. CLEVVER: drags jusin bieber, he has no privacy. please. you still don't choose privacy... DLISTED: drags michael cera, cleopatra, and gal gadot. glal gladot? listen michael cera should absolutely play cleopatra. he must. why? who knows. i know, to prevent fake asian trees like scarlett johanssen from taking the role. gal gadooooot. WENDY WILLIAMS wendy drags shonda rhimes. bill cosby. a pro tip: don't do old people anal, film it, and somebody leaks it. i cant take anythinfg from leslie jones, her old anal pics or her toilet rules. ew. DISHRINGER #prowoman

Joy and Danii cover the 3rd episode of the BSC Netflix show and discuss the modernized portrayal of diabetes and cyberbullying, the disappointing distance between Stacey and our fave Dr. Johanssen, Mary-Anne's incredible one-liners, and the importance of women supporting women...unless they want to put you out of business.

Uli Mayer-Johanssen ist Mitglied der deutschen Sektion des Club of Rome und eine der Zentralen Protagonisten der Deutschen Designszene. Sie war Mitbegründerin eines der größten Corporate Designbüros, MetaDesign. Sie hat Wirtschaftsimperien beim Wachstum begleitet, aber auch Abstürze und Krisen gesehen. Sie hat als Frau in einer Branche, die damals noch mehr als heute eine Männerdomäne war, Karriere gemacht. Ihr Fokus liegt heute mehr denn je auf der Frage, wie es uns gelingen kann, eine nachhaltige Welt zu schaffen. und insbesondre, wie dies JETZT geschehen kann.

If you watched HBO's The Watchmen, it probably filled you with rage, curiosity, confusion, and disappointment. Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons' original work deconstructed and destroyed the American super hero mythos. The work was complete and final.Or so we thought, until HBO and Damon Lindeloff came along.The resulting TV series is what happens when an ambitious work is handed to a showrunner without any discernible vision or any further comment on The Watchmen's themes.Here to help us piece together this latest entry into American pop culture's "Police Are Good, Actually" genre are two podcast veterans. "Podside Pete" Johannsen joins us from Podside Picnic, a podcast that discusses science fiction on a weekly basis. Learn more (and support them!) here: https://www.patreon.com/PodsidePicnicWe're also joined by Leslie Lee III of Struggle Session, a can't-miss-it podcast that focuses on pop culture critique from the left. Check 'em out (and support them!) here: https://www.patreon.com/strugglesessionAnd check out Leslie's piece on the Watchmen published in Truthdig: https://www.truthdig.com/articles/whitewashing-watchmen/If you enjoyed this podcast, please consider giving to us on Patreon: www.patreon.com/futureleftIf you enjoyed this podcast but can't support us with money, consider helping us get the word out by sharing us on social media or recommending us to a friend.

Sol-Jo joined the podcast form Bergen, Norway for a wide ranging conversation about astrology and healing in today tumultuous times. Sol shared fully matured astro-language focusing on self-worth rather than self-confidence, and understanding rather than control. This was a great talk with a fantastic astrologer, therapist, teacher, writer and healer. Links - https://sol-with.com/ - Twitter: @SolWith - IG: solwithjonassen

RYJ reviews 1917, Once Upon a time in Hollywood, Parasite, The Irishman, and Marriage Story with special guests Jeremiah and Cinthya Zabal, and Molly KarshFollow me on IG, and twitter - @ohitsbigronShow Art by Katie Helm, follow her on IG - @katieladybug3Theme Music by Breakmaster Cylinder(Check out Time Well Spent, another podcast from ohitsBigRon studios)

In this epsiode, we interview Conner Johanssen, a former Hilliard Davidson cross country runner. We ask him question to reflect on his high school experience with the team and about his ambitions as he heads to Dayton University to continue his running career.•Website: http://stridelive.co/•Intro Music: https://www.bensound.com/•Special Guest - Conner Johanssen: https://instagram.com/conbro_37?igshid=1oj3fsnhckskb••Support the show (https://stridelive.co/)

Sometimes you don't have one long idea. Sometimes you have two small ones. And you smash them together, like the gods did with the first Dagwood. Such is today's episode. First, Tassie and Mr. Johanssen return, this time preparing for their foray into the movie business. If you've ever received a statue with the inscription WORLD'S TALLEST GOLFING UNCLE, this one's for you. And then, it's Frank and Smacky, the morning zoo radio guys, giving out tickets to the the big Hot Babies in Tinfoil show at the amphitheater. So just take the easy donut, and watch out for that tanker full of knee paste. Enjoy!

Jacob Johanssen's research is influenced by media and communication studies, psychoanalysis, psychosocial studies and critical theory. His work revolves mainly around two themes: exploring Freudian psychoanalysis as a theory and method for digital media research with a particular focus on conceptualisations of affect, as well as using psychoanalysis to think critically about contemporary digital culture more broadly. He is Course Leader for the MA Data, Culture and Society, a new interdisciplinary course on datafication and big data, which launches in 2019. Dr. Johanssen's research interests include audience research, social media, digital labour, psychoanalysis and the media, affect theory, psychosocial studies, critical theory, as well as digital culture. His work has appeared in triple C; the International Journal of Cultural Studies; Information, Communication & Society; Journalism Studies and other journals. He is the author of the monograph Psychoanalysis and Digital Culture: Audiences, Social Media, and Big Data (Routledge, 2019). He is a Founding Scholar of the British Psychoanalytic Council. He is also member of the Executive Committee of the Association for Psychosocial Studies (APS) and serves as its Membership Secretary. Dr. Johanssen is convenor of the Psychoanalysis at Westminster reading group. From 2010-2013, he was Co-Editor of the journal Cyborg Subjects: Discourses on Digital Culture. It was an open access, open review journal on digital culture, politics and subjectivity. Selected papers and new chapters were published as a book in 2013. Before joining CAMRI in 2016 as Senior Lecturer, Dr. Johanssen was Hourly Paid Lecturer in Psychosocial Studies at the University of East London from 2012-2015. He holds a BA in Communication Studies (University of Salzburg), an MA in Media and Communications (Goldsmiths, University of London) and a PhD from the University of East London. The Skin Ego by Didier Anzieu is discussed in this episode.  Rendering Unconscious Podcast is hosted by psychoanalyst Dr. Vanessa Sinclair, who interviews psychoanalysts, psychologists, scholars, creative arts therapists, writers, poets, philosophers, artists & other intellectuals about their process, work, world events, the current state of mental health care, politics, culture, the arts & more. If you enjoy what we’re doing, please support the podcast at www.patreon.com/vanessa23carl For more info visit: www.drvanessasinclair.net www.trapart.net www.dasunbehagen.org The track playing at the end of the episode is titled “A Mirror of Nothing” from the album Message 23. Words by Vanessa Sinclair. Music by Damages. www.highbrow-lowlife.com Artwork by Vanessa Sinclair

On this week's news episode, we contemplate What Men Want... and find it isn't much. We also uncover: What can Taraji P Henson learn to win poker Green Book equals book two Oscars Beverly Luff Linn is confusing as sin A director wants a robo actor, can he get a SAG card? The highest paid actresses of 2018 has a new winner

Comedian Jake Johanssen is finishing up an international tour with Russell Peters. He talks about touring with that show and traveling around the world on what can be a brutal performance schedule.J. Elvis Weinstein joins and the two talk about audiences and politics and what it takes to be a successful comic today.Jake tells a story about how the talent coordinator for THE TONIGHT SHOW with JOHNNY CARSON thought Jake's style might be interpreted by Johnny as nervousness and it delayed his booking on that show.Jake and Mark go back to the 80s and Mark's a big fan of Jake's work but this is Jake's first appearance on the show.Jake has a podcast called JAKE THIS.J.Elvis Weinstein's podcast with Andy Kindler is called THOUGHT SPIRAL.We start the show with political analyst and hockey fanatic, Michael Shure, running into The Stanley Cup.Michael also discusses the crisis on the southern border and asks Mark a question about trophy hunting.To reach our show just drop us an email: edgewithmarkthompson@gmail.com00:00-2:10 Mark welcomes us2:10- 21:25 Michael Shure on Stanley Cup, Southern Border Drama21:25-1:38:00 Jake Johanssen

Comedian Jake Johanssen is finishing up an international tour with Russell Peters.  He talks about touring with that show and traveling around the world on what can be a brutal performance schedule. J. Elvis Weinstein joins and the two talk about audiences and politics and what it takes to be a successful comic today. Jake tells a story about how the talent coordinator for THE TONIGHT SHOW with JOHNNY CARSON thought Jake's style might be interpreted by Johnny as nervousness and it delayed his booking on that show. Jake and Mark go back to the 80s and Mark's a big fan of Jake's work but this is Jake's first appearance on the show. Jake has a podcast called JAKE THIS.   J.Elvis Weinstein's podcast with Andy Kindler is called THOUGHT SPIRAL. We start the show with political analyst and hockey fanatic, Michael Shure, running into The Stanley Cup. Michael also discusses the crisis on the southern border and asks Mark a question about trophy hunting. To reach our show just drop us an email: edgewithmarkthompson@gmail.com 00:00-2:10 Mark welcomes us 2:10- 21:25 Michael Shure on Stanley Cup, Southern Border Drama 21:25-1:38:00 Jake Johanssen

Comedian Jake Johanssen is finishing up an international tour with Russell Peters.  He talks about touring with that show and traveling around the world on what can be a brutal performance schedule. J. Elvis Weinstein joins and the two talk about audiences and politics and what it takes to be a successful comic today. Jake tells a story about how the talent coordinator for THE TONIGHT SHOW with JOHNNY CARSON thought Jake's style might be interpreted by Johnny as nervousness and it delayed his booking on that show. Jake and Mark go back to the 80s and Mark's a big fan of Jake's work but this is Jake's first appearance on the show. Jake has a podcast called JAKE THIS.   J.Elvis Weinstein's podcast with Andy Kindler is called THOUGHT SPIRAL. We start the show with political analyst and hockey fanatic, Michael Shure, running into The Stanley Cup. Michael also discusses the crisis on the southern border and asks Mark a question about trophy hunting. To reach our show just drop us an email: edgewithmarkthompson@gmail.com 00:00-2:10 Mark welcomes us 2:10- 21:25 Michael Shure on Stanley Cup, Southern Border Drama 21:25-1:38:00 Jake Johanssen

Dread it. Run From it. Destiny still arrives. That moment is here. Thanos has come, and the fate of Marvel-less Marian lies in the balance. Missy Ladiona joins us for the Marvel event of our lives. Infinity War is upon us, and Marian has been so excited — to see if Tony Stark dies. In […]

It’s the big one, everyone. Well, no. Not Avengers: Infinity War but the first movie that Marian may have been more excited for than Patrick or Myke, which is saying a lot because they were very excited too. T’Challa goes home in Black Panther and we follow him to Wakanda – and kind of don’t […]

The God of Thunder is back, and for the first time – he’s actually bringing the literal thunder. Since this special installment in the franchise brings in a major player from the MCU – we decided to bring in our own special guest: Casey Causley! We get into the third Thor movie, what we loved, […]

For our Homecoming episode, there was no better choice for a guest than our sister Missy – who happened to be home when Spider-Man came out (yes, we make this joke on the podcast – sue us). If you thought it was funny when Marian was baffled by seeing the MCU movies for the first […]

Alright, enough of superheroes fighting each other. It’s time for a good ol’ epic fight to save the world – er, wait, galaxy. For the second time. In order to give this space epic it’s due, we did another crossover with Myke’s other podcast, “The Geekdom Fancast” and had Derek on to talk about the […]

Gaby Wilson (MTV) returns for the second half of Ghost in the Shell. We cover the spider tank, Adwoa Aboah, transracialization, and our own mixed race heritage.      - Why Japan Won't Save GITS From Being A Box Office Flop  from The Hollywood Reporter  - Ghost in the Shell: The Major's Body from Women Writing About Comics   

A HERO IS BORN: PART THREE! You didn't think we'd actually do it, did you? We did two episodes of the superhero story without an actual, you know, "superhero" and you thought we'd just never get there. Well, get ready to be only barely more wrong than you thought you'd be, because it's time for SHY COW MAN! In a continuation of Part 2, Mr. Johanssen and Tassie are discussing...oh, I mean, you know what they're discussing. A report from Garfield the cat, a goose that has raised it's awareness of "telling about things". Usual big business stuff. But then...the hero rises from the pile of chemicals into which he dissolved. And he's got powers. Not great powers, but powers nonetheless! And now, the question is, will he use his powers for good, or for evil? Or will he use them to do good for a lamb named Staniel? Time probably won't tell.

Now back to our regular scheduled programming. We don’t have to tell you that Civil War has just been released upon the world – according to box office stats, you’ve found out. Maybe twice already. People have been ranting and raving about the film, but none of those people are Marvel (now full) Marian! We talk about […]

This week we get a new Coen Brothers movie to digest.  Can it live up to the hype of what the trailers have promised?  How does it fit within the canon of other Coen Brothers comedies?  All this and more on this week's episode.  Subscribe on iTunes:  https://itun.es/i6gB67Y  Check out our Facebook page:  www.facebook.com/actorandengineer and follow us on twitter @actorengineer.

To ring in the New Year (and so you don’t have to wait until Civil War to hear from us again) we’re bringing you a Marian-less Marvel-less Marian (say that five times fast). Since she only contractually agreed to watch all the Marvel movies (someone start a petition to make her watch the TV shows, too) […]

By this time you’ve probably already seen the trailer for Captain America: Civil War, but you haven’t heard Myke and Marian’s thoughts yet. We break down the trailer shot by shot and pontificate about what we’ll be seeing in Avengers 2.5. Is Marian excited? Is she lying? Find out in this quick recap. Let us know what […]

After a few months off we’re (finally) back. We went to the biggest screen we could find to watch Marvel’s SMALLEST hero (and other such Ant jokes). This movie had it all. Paul Rudd! Michael Pena! Ants! Did the movie live up to Marvel’s BIG expectations?! How many more size jokes can I make?! Since […]

It is Father's Day in the United States, and the Nighthawks sit down at the cafe diner for a piping hot cup of films about pabulum and patres familias, diet and dads, food and fathers. First up is the John Favreau passion vehicle CHEF, a heart-warming film about a man who must learn to sift his love of cooking, to find the ingredients of bonding with his son. Similarly, the documentary JIRO DREAMS OF SUSHI is about the world's greatest sushi chef who not only must perfect his craft, but pass his knowledge down to the next generation. Gang, fair warning: don't watch these films with an empty stomach.

His time has finally come. This week marks the first time all three members of our podcast venture into a Marvel movie for their first times. Yes, it’s finally here. Avengers: Age of Ultron. For the second big MCU crossover event, Marvel-less Marian needed to have a crossover event of our own so we brought on Derek […]

Misjon

Misjon

Wil is joined by "Guest Charlie" and 42-time David Letterman guest Jake Johanssen to talk about what you get David Letterman for his birthday, how the internet is racist against TV shows, and why you should never play word games with a New Zealander.