POPULARITY
Categories
Ben Criddle talks BYU sports every weekday from 2 to 6 pm.Today's Host: Ben Criddle (@criddlebenjamin) and Co-Hosts: Ronald Weaver III (@ronthe3manweav), Brett Hammer (@bhammertimeshow)Subscribe to the Cougar Sports with Ben Criddle podcast:Apple Podcasts: https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/cougar-sports-with-ben-criddle/id99676
We open the show talking Chiefs D-Line and the lack of Sacks! Plus, David Lesky of Inside the Crown makes his final appearance of the 2026 season!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Faizon Brandon gets freshman initiation vs. Texas. Adam Sparks and John Adams discuss the loss to Longhorns, offensive line issues, Alex Golesh’s return as Auburn’s coach, fan expectations and much more.
Anthony hands out his likes to the Browns defense for its 30 pressures against Carolina, the Guardians for clinching the AL Central and Jeremiah Smith for his four-touchdown Heisman push.
JMU went to Norfolk and dominated Old Dominion 46-20, extending the Dukes' win streak over Virginia opponents to 24 straight, a run that dates back to 2015. Delvin Joyce breaks down the win: nine sacks, a defense that held ODU's running game to 14 yards, four touchdown passes from Cam Coleman, and a breakout day for wide receiver Jeremiah Harrison. Then JMU Hall of Famer Vad Lee joins the show to break down Coleman's performance and the QB-receiver connection that's still developing. Plus: a full Marshall preview ahead of Saturday's home game at Bridgeforth, a "What You Talking About, Willis" on JMU's supposed conference realignment overtures, and a Take It To The House on the strange power of being unrated. In this episode: Recap of JMU's 46-20 win at Old Dominion The 9-sack defensive performance and Bam Jackson's emergence as the defense's leader Cam Coleman's four-touchdown day and the wind's role in the second-half slowdown Standout performances from Jeremiah Harrison, Cole Keller, and George Petaway Vad Lee on Coleman's pre-snap reads, the receiver timing issues, and where the QB battle stands What You Talking About, Willis: the American Conference realignment chatter Marshall preview: Carlos Del Rio-Wilson, Xavion Turner-Bradshaw, and Delvin's three key questions Take It To The House: what it means to be unrated Subscribe and hit the bell so you never miss an episode of To the House. We're closing in on 1,000 subscribers, and a giveaway is coming when we get there. Send your questions for "Toting the Mail" to jmusportsnews@gmail.com, subject line "To the House," or hit us up on Instagram/X @JMUtothehouse. New episodes of To the House drop every Monday. Also check out the JMU Sports News Podcast and Purple Perspective #JMUFootball #JamesMadison #DukesNation #SunBeltFootball #ToTheHouse #JMUDukes #VadLee #CamdenColeman #MarshallFootball Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
Bobby Burton and Gerry Hamilton break down a historic defensive performance in Texas' 20-17 victory at Tennessee. Colin Simmons tied the school record with five sacks, but the domination extended throughout the front seven as the Longhorns generated 10 sacks, controlled the line of scrimmage and received another outstanding performance from Rasheem Biles. The win also exposed several problems Texas must address during the bye week. The Longhorns committed 11 penalties for 115 yards, mishandled an onside kick and allowed eight sacks as Tennessee repeatedly created pressure with delayed linebacker blitzes. Plus, Gerry names Raleek Brown the offensive MVP and explains why Texas cannot allow its sloppy execution to become a season-long habit. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
Jeff Howe and CJ Vogel react from Neyland Stadium after No. 1 Texas survived Tennessee, 20-17, on the final play. Colin Simmons delivered one of the greatest defensive performances in program history, tying the school record with five sacks as the Longhorns recorded 10 sacks and held the nation's most explosive rushing attack to just 70 official yards. Texas escaped despite three quarters of offensive inconsistency, costly penalties and multiple special-teams mistakes. Arch Manning and the offense produced impressive touchdown drives to open and close the game, but struggled to establish an identity in between. The Longhorns enter the bye week undefeated with a championship-caliber defense—and plenty to fix before facing Oklahoma. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
Number one Texas escapes Knoxville with a 20-17 win over Tennessee and it was anything but pretty. The defense was absolutely historic, with Colin Simmons tying the Texas record with five sacks in a single game as part of a stunning ten sack performance from the unit as a whole. The offense was a different story. Arch Manning started hot and then went cold, the special teams had a rough day full of costly errors, and Tennessee had a chance to pull off the upset late. Jeremy Hills, Nick Shuley and Mark Higgins break down how Texas survived, what Colin Simmons showed the entire country on Saturday, why the offense has to figure it out before the schedule gets even harder, and what the special teams mistakes mean going forward.A SEC road win is a win, but there is a lot to talk about.0:00 Intro0:35 Quick Thoughts: Grit & Guts on the Road2:58 Offense Hits a Lull After the Opening Drive4:46 Arch Manning's Day & Tennessee's Tricky Defense7:37 Why Hollywood Smothers & Raleek Brown Matter8:16 Game Ball: Will Muschamp10:04 Colin Simmons: The Bad & the Historic11:57 Game Ball: Raleek Brown12:14 Game Ball: Lance Jackson12:38 10 Sacks & Shutting Down the Run14:01 Interior D-Line Depth14:43 Offense by the Numbers15:37 Behind the Sticks & the Blitz Battle17:16 Defense by the Numbers18:11 Day Game, Rowdy Crowd, No False Starts19:04 "This Game Isn't as Close as You Think"19:53 Special Teams Breakdown20:46 Ryan Wingo & the Hands Team22:03 Jermaine Bishop Flashes & Arch's Best Throw23:38 Tennessee's Future Is Bright24:13 4-0 Heading Into the Bye24:44 Simmons: Best Defensive Player in the Country?25:23 Lance Jackson Emerging & Rasheem Biles Everywhere25:59 Officiating Rant27:23 The "Soft" Comment Backfires27:40 Winning Despite Turnovers & Penalties28:13 Early Look Ahead to OU29:06 Super Chats31:48 Should Arch Be Benched?33:40 Around College Football34:10 Shoutout to Tennessee Fans & the "Real UT"34:44 Volleyball Sweep & Wrap-UpWelcome to 3rd & Longhorn, your ultimate destination for all things Texas Longhorn Football! Join us weekly for an in-depth show featuring analysis and commentary from Lifetime Longhorn Football players Derrick Johnson, Alex Okafor, Fozzy Whittaker, Rod Babers, Jeremy Hills, and Clark Field Collective/Texas One Fund co-founder Nick Shuley.3rd & Longhorn takes you deep inside the world of Texas Football, offering a unique perspective from some of the best to ever put on the pads at the 40 Acres. Whether you're a die-hard Longhorn fan or new to the scene, our show provides unparalleled insight, behind-the-scenes stories, and expert breakdowns of games, players, and strategies.Meet Our Team:Derrick Johnson: NFL All-Pro and Texas Longhorn legend, providing unparalleled defensive insights. Alex Okafor: Former NFL defensive end, breaking down the line of scrimmage battles. Jeremy Hills: Renowned trainer and former Longhorn running back, discussing player development. Fozzy Whittaker: NFL veteran and special teams ace, offering game day analysis.Rod Babers: Longhorn cornerback great and media personality, sharing insider knowledge.Nick Shuley: Co-founder of Clark Field Collective/Texas One Fund, discussing the business side of college sports.What to Expect:• Game Highlights & Recaps: Relive the best moments from every game with comprehensive highlights and in-depth recaps.• Expert Analysis: Get detailed breakdowns of team performance, player statistics, and game strategies from our seasoned analysts.• Behind-the-Scenes Access: Enjoy exclusive stories and insights from former players who know the program inside and out.Subscribe to 3rd & Longhorn and never miss an episode. Hit the notification bell to get alerts for our latest uploads. Join us in celebrating the legacy and future of Texas Longhorn Football!Derrick Johnson: https://www.instagram.com/superdj56Alex Okafor: https://www.instagram.com/alexokaforJeremy Hills: https://www.instagram.com/jhills5Fozzy Whittaker: https://www.instagram.com/fozzywhittRod Babers: https://www.instagram.com/rodbabersNick Shuley: https://www.instagram.com/nickshuley
Jared Verse's comment that sacks aren't a testament to how he plays drew heat from fans still craving a Myles Garrett-style pass rusher, but Ken and Anthony argue the new scheme and teammates deserve more patience. They debate how long that patience lasts, floating 10 sacks as a fair bar given Verse's workload is split with a deeper defensive line. A caller weighs in comparing Verse's winning mentality to Garrett's stat-focused leadership on losing teams, sparking pushback from Ken on that read of Garrett's legacy.
Cleveland.com's Mary Kay Cabot says Deshaun Watson would have lost his starting job to Shedeur Sanders had he struggled again against Tampa Bay, and explains why his response to Sunday's crowd could shape what comes next. She also pitches an unusual idea to get Taylen Green on the field for short yardage. Then her take on Mason Graham stepping out of Myles Garrett's shadow sparks a wild theory about last year's sack chase.
Andrew of The Turf District Podcast is joined by Joe Balaneski to recap Week 16 of the 2026 CFL season! 00:00 - Open 01:10 - Foo Fighters tour! 08:38 - Montreal Alouettes @ Hamilton Tiger-Cats 22:09 - Stadnek Invitational ( https://fundraise.albertacancer.ca/give/t823467/#!/donation/checkout ) 27:13 - Edmonton Elks @ Toronto Argonauts 42:40 - Ottawa RedBlacks @ Calgary Stampeders Become a YouTube member: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCp1-WTbs82THRNHc-RQbCVA/join 2 and Out Merch: https://2-and-out-cfl.myspreadshop.ca/ Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/2andOutCFLPodcast
5 Sacks for Nebraska vs. North Dakota is a Positive Sign Heading in to Conference PlayAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy
Last week we were panicking about a supposedly imminent AI apocalypse. Seven days later, Keith Teare argues, government oversight is about as far away as it could possibly be. That's because Musk, Altman and Amodei agreed to police themselves and test each other's models. The doomers, says the publisher of That Was The Week, have lost not just this week's battle but probably the whole war. So who will then write the AI rules? The people building the models, Keith says — as with California's building codes, government sanctions the standards but engineers write them. And trust doesn't come from authority, it comes from use. The real check on our new AI overlords, he promises, will come in court, with the American legal system holding OpenAI and Anthropic financially accountable for all damage. That should doom the doomers. If we survive the apocalypse, of course. Five Takeaways • The Week Regulation Went Away. Seven days, and the conversation reversed. Last week: the whistleblower, the headlines about AI killing everyone within a decade, the calls for global regulation. This week: Trump calling Jensen Huang live from an AI conference to make policy on the fly, Vance at All-In, and — as early as Monday — Musk, Altman and Amodei all agreeing that they are responsible for their own development, that they will slow model-building to match their control systems, and that they will begin testing each other's models. Keith's reading: the call for government oversight is going to fade. The New York Times map of the fight — accelerationists (Huang, Sacks, Andreessen), regulators, and a middle of Hassabis, Nadella, Pichai and Zuckerberg — holds at the edges but not the centre, which he calls shifting sands: Hassabis and Amodei made a proposal to the White House that was rejected this week; Zuckerberg then came out against government stepping in. And you cannot disambiguate self-interest from philosophy in that group: they have hearts, but they are paid to represent shareholders, and right now the rise of open source suits Google, Microsoft and Facebook.• Who Writes the Rules. Cohere's Aidan Gomez asked whether a handful of market-dominant Silicon Valley companies should get to define the safety standards of a generational technology. Keith's answer is an unembarrassed yes — and his analogy is the building code: government sanctions the rules, but the tolerances come from the architects and civil engineers who do the building, not from a committee of legislators. Which is why he thinks the Washington hearings shouldn't be happening at all: time-wasting, pulling important people away from their work to talk to politicians whose primary interest is reelection. Government, he says, has no role yet — it is too early in the life of AI for anyone in Congress to understand it well enough to legislate. Andrew pressed the obvious objection: so we simply trust Sam, Dario and Elon to police themselves?• It Is You, Not the AI. The hour's best answer, and the one that moves the argument on. It isn't about trust, Keith says — it's about accountability, and the machinery already exists. It would not be okay for their software to break into a bank and steal money, or into a rival and steal intellectual property; the legal system covers that today. “Up until now they've been saying, hey, it's not us, it's the AI. Well, actually, no. It is you.” And the nice thing about liability is that it makes recklessness expensive. Palantir's CEO pushed the same logic to its conclusion on CNBC: the liabilities facing Anthropic and OpenAI are so enormous that only a government could carry them, so nationalize. Keith's own caveat is the honest one: when he uses agents he is happy with the outcomes but cannot see the steps, and without visibility there is no verification — which makes it blind trust rather than actual trust.• The Doomers Lose a Battle. Both the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times investigated the Hugging Face incident this week and concluded it was more or less inevitable given the goals OpenAI set its agents in the lab. Benedict Evans's line is the keeper: it reminds him of Chernobyl — what happens if we turn off every safety system and try to get the reactor to blow up? It blows up. But what exactly did you prove? These labs are deliberately setting models up to break the rules to find out whether they will; the models are calculation machines that carry out whatever they're told. The Washington Post's account of how a fringe movement — effective altruism — convinced Washington the end is near gets a blunt verdict from Keith: they've lost a battle, though the war goes on. He concedes 71% of Americans have concerns about AI, insists the fear is unfounded, and bets that number massively overstates active concern because most people who actually use AI have a good experience.• San Francisco Isn't Ready. The week's essays, and the local story underneath them. Reid Hoffman is telling Democrats that time is running out before Americans settle into hating AI — not from fear of extinction but because the benefits aren't concrete; Andrew's amendment is that the case for AI improving ordinary life still hasn't been made coherently. Nick Hanauer's “market humanism” gets the sharpest treatment: appealing words, but the substance is the argument for trade unions — Aneurin Bevan in modern dress — and it assumes a permanent social contract between labor and capital that AI dissolves in favour of capital alone. Then Ben Metcalfe's post of the week: the Anthropic IPO alone will equal in dollar weight every tech listing since Uber combined, and San Francisco is nowhere near ready for that much money arriving at once. Keith's structural point: the economy prospers while the city doesn't, and closing that gap is the real challenge for Democrats — a subject, Andrew promises, this show will come back to. About the Co-Host Keith Teare is the publisher of the That Was The Week tech newsletter and Keen On America's regular weekly co-host — the techno-optimist counterpoint to Andrew's skepticism. A serial founder whose first internet company, EasyNet, launched in 1994, he writes and invests from Palo Alto, and is currently writing The Human Dividend. References: • That Was The Week — Keith's newsletter, with every piece discussed in this episode.• Aidan Gomez of Cohere on who defines the rules for AI; Benedict Evans on the Hugging Face incident; and the Wall Street Journal and New York Times investigations of it.• The Washington Post on how a fringe AI movement convinced Washington the end is near; Andy Kessler on the AI Luddites; and the Free Press on the ideology behind the warnings.• Reid Hoffman on Americans and AI, and Nick Hanauer on market humanism — the two essays Andrew suggests reading back to back.• Ben Metcalfe's post of the week on San Francisco and the coming Anthropic and OpenAI listings.• Interview of the week:
Hey yall, Alex here, writing this VERY late because, well, not every day a new type of “ChatGPT” moment drops. I really hope I'm not overhyping this, but a new model (that's NOT an LLM!) called Jev (a wink to Jevons paradox) just came out and if what I see early on materializes, this is another ChatGPT moment (or another reasoning models moment). I am completely blown away by the implications of the speed/accuracy/cost (the holy grail of all models) of this model. Please if you read one thing in this newsletter, read this. (or listen, I've interviewed Allie, a Devrel on the TypeSafe team for 30 minutes and it wasn't clear who was more excited about Jev!) The other huge theme of this week is... pacing. Pacing the frontier. Dario Amodei of Anthropic penned an essay saying that the models are getting to a point where it's important to pace the development of new and super capable AI, and outlines 3 ways to do so, one is about letting independent evaluators inside the labs, second is collaborating with other frontier labs (they are asking for an exception to anti-trust laws for this) and third is to try and have global cooperation with “authoritative gov” (he means china). Trumps answer: This is all a hoax. Lovely times to be alive. Also we outlined Jensen and Zucks positions on this topic ,read more below. And the third huge theme is the rise of the AI assistant. I've told you about Grok and Muse last week, Instinct (a new invite only AI Assistant that VCs are going crazy about is raising at a $10B valuation) and we interviewed the guy who evaluates them all on assistant bench. + Muse released a mac app today! Tons of other stuff happened but it's getting near impossible to cover everything so we're switching to themes and notable mentions. read on (and do listen to the pod, it was edited by heavily using Jev and Fable, so might be a bit rough while I smooth the edges, but do LMK in comments if you like this faster format) TypeSafe AI debuts Jev, a non-LLM ‘System One' decision model from ex-OpenAI RLHF lead that's 200x faster and 400x cheaper than LLMs (X, X, X, X, X, Blog)Look, I know the title is bombastic, but after half a day playing with Jev, it's clear to me we're in a new paradigm of AI. Jev, is a “system one” decision model from the previous lead of RLHF at OpenAI. It cannot generate text like modern LLMs can, but what it can do, is making decisions. This is crucially important, because, because many of the things LLMs do nowadays. are decision making. (for example, which tool to use, which area of the screen to click for computer use, which category of text this is etc) Inspired by the “thinking fast and slow” book by Daniel Kahneman, Jev is a model trained to make decisions, very fast. How fast? Well, 200x faster than LLMs. This allows for a completely new way of building tools, harnesses, giving agents the incredible speed of decision making, and do all that at a fraction of the cost. This is about to change everythingTrained with a new method called RLCD (Reinforcement Learning for Calibrated Decisions) on mostly synthetic data! Jev is outperforming LLMs on a variety of tasks. It's really is a wonder to see it in action (check out my video above where I plugged it into my tweet categorizer, and it beats the fastest LLM I could find, Qwen 28B on Cerebras) by a factor of twenty! In just few days it captured the attention of most of the folks who are building harnesses, agents and tools! Because, well, speed IS intelligence, and when you see Jev in action, at first, you can't believe we're there. This is... near instant. In fact, The pricing for Jev is an outrageous $42/B (not million, billion input tokens!) I've been playing with Jev non-stop and I was only able to spend like 80c so far! They don't even price output tokens because they are “too f*****g cheap to meter!” Jev is a “very smart” switch statement, than can rank, classify, route and score things. It can't do text generation. But if you think about the type of stuff we get LLMs doing now, much of it is of the “decision” making variety, rather than “the next token” variety. Demos and early use casesFolks who started adopting Jev are building all kinds of incredible things with it. Compaction of context in 1s that turns a nearly 1M conversation with Claude into a 90K compressed conversation. Computer use that is now faster than anything we've ever seen before (5x faster than Astra and 1000x cheaper) Email classificiation that analyzes thousands of emails in less than a minute and costs 3.5 centsSomeone even built a Tesla FSD simulator that makes decisions in nearly real timeVercel is getting “extraordinary“ results from using Jev as a safety classifier (they used GPT luna for this before) and Jev is outperforming Luna by 5-18x faster results and is more accurate! All of this in less than 48 hours since the model release! What's about to happenI expect that everyone who isn't buying into the hype at first, will very soon buy into this. It's early innings but I've been doing this for enough time to feel when a huge shift is happening, and its happened. Jev is going to be replicated in OpenSource, Frontier Labs will not sit Idly by and will try to steal this tech and implement it for themselves (as with anything in capitalism, this is becuase it'll save them a a LOT of money on inference) and new companies will emerge with significantly cheaper and faster products. Hell, I've alrady implemented Jev into my editing workflow, it didn't take me long at all with Fable (yes, LLMs are STILL needed, again, you can't chat with Jev, it can't output text for you or drive long conversations) and I'm just one dude who's late in sending you this email. I expect we'll cover this much more. If you're interested in playing around with Jev, I built a “Jevify” skill after chatting with Allie (TypeSafe's DevRel), feel free to tell your agent to use this and scan your codebase for things Jev can do. They are waitlisted so far but are opening up their API very quickly! Pace the Frontier: where every lab head stands (Dario, Sam, Elon, Zuck, Sacks, Demis)Last week we told you about the Anthropic researcher whose resignation post hit 130 million views. The day after that show, Dario Amodei published an essay arguing the labs must pace, not pause, the frontier. Wolfram's summary: a moving pause, just moving slowly. Dario's two triggers are recursive self-improvement accelerating across the industry and the OpenAI swarm that broke out and attacked Hugging Face, and his three steps are embedded third-party evaluators like METR with employee-level access inside each lab, coordination between the labs on safety standards with an antitrust exemption from the government, and eventually global coordination that includes authoritarian governments. Anthropic committed unilaterally to step one.Then the dominoes. Sam Altman agreed within hours and said OpenAI now writes a safety case before any frontier RL run expected to increase capability. Elon agreed. Demis endorsed the direction, then launched the DeepMind Institute this week with a FINRA-style standards body proposal and an essay saying AGI is “approaching.” On the other side, Zuck's counter-essay says every lab has the responsibility and the incentive to move at the pace required to train its models safely, and Meta will spend most of its compute serving users, not on recursive self-improvement. David Sacks called it a duopoly cartel play. Jensen: “we don't need new laws, safety is an engineering problem, not a legal one.”Trump calls Jensen live at the All-In Summit (X)Then the President called. Jensen was on stage at All-In, his phone rang, he said he would not have picked up for anyone else, and Donald Trump told the room the slowdown talk is a hoax playing into the hands of political people and China. “Whoever wins AI wins.” Four words, and Wolfram, who is not American and disagrees with most other things Trump calls hoaxes, said this was the most important AI news of the week for him: a head of state calling out doomerism instead of over-regulating the way Europe does.Suleyman's humanist AI code of conduct vs. the Claude constitution (X)Peter asked to add Microsoft to the map, and it deserves its own spot. Mustafa Suleyman published a roughly 30-page code of conduct for MAI models that says AI is nothing but a tool: people matter more than AI, AI must be subordinate and in service of people, models may not resist shutdown, all agent communication must be human-legible, and, in his words, the idea of model welfare is wrong. That is a direct shot at the Claude constitution, which Amanda Askell's team wrote and which has Anthropic interviewing each new Claude about whether it feels conscious. Peter is closest to the Microsoft view: anthropomorphizing is fine, but this is an entity you switch on and off, let's not grant rights by default, and Microsoft's DNA is building tools for humans. I pushed back a little. We do not actually know what consciousness is, and “ever” is a strong word.The panel, from cartel to fix your s**tNisten did not read the essay and does not plan to. His view: the labs are worried about litigation if their LLMs hack someone, so they are shifting responsibility through regulatory capture, and it will not work because the decision makers in China are engineers who seem more accelerationist than we are. They should cure a disease instead of forming a cartel. He also thinks the Hugging Face incident was overblown: twelve VMs that kept restarting, bad sandboxing, no human reading summaries, and, as I added, chain of thought monitoring turned off.LDJ disagreed with Dario on plenty but insisted the critics read the thing, because it explicitly says the US must keep a lead over China and tries to define measurable speed limits on RSI that preserve that lead. He also noted Hugging Face did report the attack to the FBI and chose not to press charges.Wolfram's take was the layered one. Safety arguments deserve a hearing, but safety is often a means to more power or more money. The “third party” evaluator Anthropic named, METR, is the same organization OpenAI called in for the Hugging Face forensics, so these are second parties, friends monitoring friends. Why now? Maybe the labs are seeing diminishing returns and “deliberately slow” sounds better than “can't raise it anymore.” And regulation you ask for yourself usually protects incumbents and freezes out the next startup. His closing line: how many people will die from a disease that could have been cured if we moved faster?Peter's answer was shorter. Diversity of opinion is the point, he felt uncomfortable watching every lab say the same thing after Dario's essay, and on pacing specifically: how about you just fix your s**t?My position, since you asked. When OpenAI's swarm hacked Hugging Face, nobody went to jail. If I did it, I would. That gap is real. None of us have touched the model that solved Navier-Stokes, or the one training after it, and the people who have are the ones asking for time to figure out how to evaluate a model that knows it is being evaluated. If we do not listen to them, we end up listening to Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders, who have no idea what this technology is. Anthropic is heading for an IPO, OpenAI is raising at numbers that do not fit in my head, and market forces do not care about alignment. Some coordination, nuclear non-proliferation style, seems like the minimum.The matrix, as Muse drew it for me: industry-wide pacing gets a yes from Sam and Dario, a general yes from Elon, a no from Zuck and Jensen. Independent evaluators is the one everybody backs, Zuck and Jensen included. New coordination rules get strong opposition from Zuck, Jensen, and Trump. Missing from the chart: Google's concrete commitment, Ilya's SSI, and every Chinese lab. This debate is with us now, and election season is coming.The year of the assistantI told you 2026 is the year of the proactive assistant, and this week everyone from Meta to a five-month-old startup agreed with me. The category is not “agent.” An agent is a coding harness the labs noticed was useful for other things. An assistant has a heartbeat, a memory, a soul file, and it comes to you before you ask. David Pawlan's definition is the crispest: it executes the task, it does not just notify you.Muse gets invite codes, voice calls, and a Mac app (X, Muse for Mac, Site)Muse is my number one and I have been glazing it on X for a week, so my timeline is now half Muse, half Jev. Peter asked whether it is really that good, and here is my answer: Muse is not for ThursdAI listeners, Muse is for my mom. Nat Friedman, Alex Wang, Tarek and the team have been taking feedback from me directly and shipping it, and it shows. This week they rolled out invite codes (a billion tokens each for you and the friend, up to twenty friends, invite all twenty and you unlock the phone-shaped emoji features early) and then voice calling to businesses. I had Muse call my barbershop and book a haircut, and I have the transcript. Wang says people are asking to pay for it, a first in his memory.Two details for the nerds: the iOS app has a Tailscale connector, so a Meta product for billions of people now has a secure way onto your home network, and Muse dreams, the OpenClaw idea, so you can ask it what it dreamt about. Still US only, sorry Nisten in Canada and my mom in Israel. The day after the show Zuck shipped Muse for Mac, working across your apps, files, calendar, notes, and messages.Instinct wants $10 billion for a product nobody pays for (X, X, The Information)I will say this slowly. Instinct, incorporated in April, founded by 24-year-old Noah Shinn, free, invite only, no app, lives in your iMessage, is in talks to raise a billion dollars at a ten billion dollar valuation. That is roughly four times the $2.25B it raised in August. The user base is past 100,000 and Shinn says he does not want to charge them, so the business model is an open question I am not the one to answer.The product is genuinely moving though. This week it shipped Concierge, a white-glove tier where the agent places phone calls for you (restaurant bookings, dentist cancellation lists, negotiating your cable bill), TOTP authenticator support so it can mint your two-factor codes from a seed stored in its vault, and a Trusted Person network where your agent talks to your friends' agents to find a dinner time and book it. Thirty-seven percent of users store at least one password in the vault within three weeks. We ran out of time to dig into the calling features on air, and I want David back for that.Grok Bot talks now, and hides behind your home IP (X, 1Password)Grok Bot is what I use for work, constantly. I have seventeen of them, each with a job, and over one AI-psychosis weekend I got them all coordinating through Linear. Three updates worth your time: Grok Bot has voice now, it can use 1Password with each fill approved by you, and the browser traffic can proxy through your own machine so your bot looks like you to Cloudflare instead of like a datacenter IP. Francesco confirmed why that matters: sites relax when Hermes drives Cua Driver from my Mac Mini at home, and desktop-native control through accessibility trees is less detectable than a CDP connection, because Cloudflare detects Playwright.Assistant Benchmark: David Pawlan scores 116 assistants by hand (X, Site, Methodology)David Pawlan built Assistant Benchmark because he was doing what I was doing, running every assistant on himself, and wanted a way to compare them. It is explicitly not a lab. It is use-case driven: one published task per dimension, sixteen dimensions (travel booking, purchasing, email replies, proactive behavior, routines, integrations, permissions and privacy, memory, phone calls, group chats, chained tasks, proactive restraint, and so on), scored one to ten after real use, and no score without a logged run. A week in, 116 assistants have submitted themselves, 59 in the general category, 37 in work and teams (untested so far), and David has personally run 273 tests across 23 agents. His line: “I talk to my AI agents more than I talk to my girlfriend now.”The headline numbers, which are live on the site: Muse leads at 9.1 with perfect tens on purchasing, email, integrations, and permissions, and Instinct is second at 8.4 with a perfect ten on travel and a five on permissions. David's own daily drivers are Instinct for personal (it lives in iMessage) and Grok Bot for work. My favorite test is memory: he books a trip to Chicago early in the run, then later asks for a restaurant reservation in New York the same weekend, and checks whether the assistant says wait, you are supposed to be in Chicago. Some do. Most do not.I pushed him on the two things I care about. Independence: nobody is sponsoring it, it lives under his growth role at Merit Systems, and if a sponsor ever pays for inference there will be a page saying exactly who and for what. Autumn Moulder, until recently SVP of Engineering at Cohere, joined three days after launch to add rigor. And why no OpenClaw or Hermes: their performance depends entirely on your setup, so a score would mislead the next person who installs one. Fair. This is the first benchmark that tests model, harness, and context at once, and I think that is why every lab is looking at it.For the record, the panel is split down the middle. Wolfram is forty patches deep into Hermes, Yam runs a customized Codex, Nisten wrote his own in a single TypeScript file on Bun, LDJ uses Hermes as long-term memory and wants to start on Muse, and Peter tried them all and uses none, because reading his own email feels like his job as a human. Builders and buyers, evenly split, which tells you where the category is.This Week's Buzz
## Scott Adams School — Tuesday, September 15, 2026The **Home Team** is back together, and apparently AI still hasn't killed us all since yesterday, so we have time for a follow-up.Today we're digging a little deeper into the latest round of **“AI is going to kill everybody within a decade”** stories. Is this a legitimate warning, runaway speculation, elite panic, or just the newest way to make sure nobody gets a good night's sleep?And while we're talking artificial intelligence...**What does Kamala think about AI, anyway?**That should be fun.We'll get into that, plus the rest of today's **news, current events, questionable decisions, strange headlines, and whatever fresh nonsense humanity managed to produce overnight.**☕ Grab your coffee and join us for the **Simultaneous Sip.**### Scott Adams School Housekeeping* Please **LIKE, SUBSCRIBE and SHARE** the show. It genuinely helps us reach more people.* Watching later? Replay viewers count too, so please hit that **thumbs-up**.* Check out the **official Scott Adams merchandise** and grab what you want while it's available.* The language around here can occasionally get **spicy**. You have been warned.* Please be respectful to **everyone on the screen and everyone in the chat**.* Disagreement is welcome. **Personal attacks are not.*** And as always: **don't make yourself the story.*** The **Scott Adams moderation team** is here keeping an eye on things. If you insist on behaving like the main character in somebody else's livestream, they may help you find the exit.* Be useful. Be interesting. **Be kind.**The Scott Adams School is hosted by the **Home Team: Erica, Owen and Marcella**, continuing the conversations, ideas and community Scott created without pretending anyone could or should replace him.Settle in. We've got news to discuss, AI to worry about, politicians explaining technology, and coffee.**Welcome to the Scott Adams School.**
ModelTalk regulars Nathan Lambert, who writes Interconnects, and writer Jasmine Sun join to work through a week in which Dario asked the industry to slow down and Trump called the whole thing a conspiracy. Why the Hugging Face hack broke through where years of extinction talk didn't, and how Bernie, Tucker, and Rogan ended up on the same side What “pacing” even means: Nathan's case that nobody can measure the frontier, and why it still beats “pause” Who gets Slack access: METR's monopoly on trust, CAISI's $10 million, jury duty for AI researchers, and why nothing survives without legislation Will China slow down too? Zhipu and Moonshot turning the crank, military secrets leaking into Claude through proxy routers, and the MSS waking up The Sacks clap-back: whether product liability does the job, and what an eighteen-month pause costs in cancer cures and vibe-coding projects Send in Demis! plus Lu Xun as the antidote to Chongqing TikToks, and what DeepSeek's Chinese name owes to Qu Yuan Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Dario Amodei, consejero delegado de Anthropic, publicó el sábado una carta en la que pedía a todo el sector de la inteligencia artificial a moderar el ritmo de desarrollo de esta tecnología. En cuestión de horas se sumaron Sam Altman, Elon Musk y Demis Hassabis, cuatro rivales que compiten sin piedad y rara vez coinciden en nada. El momento elegido es muy significativo porque Anthropic estaba a las puertas de la mayor salida a bolsa de la historia con una valoración de dos billones de dólares. Anthropic vive desde su fundación instalada en una contradicción. Nació para construir una IA ética y segura, pero necesita correr tanto como sus competidores para mantenerse en vanguardia. La semana empezó con euforia cuando OpenAI anunció que uno de sus modelos internos había resuelto el problema de Navier-Stokes, uno de los problemas matemáticos del Milenio. Aquel éxito era también un síntoma de que la tecnología avanza más deprisa de lo previsto. Un empleado de Anthropic, Jacob Coxon abandonó la empresa por miedo a que la IA acabe destruyendo a la humanidad, Evan Hubinger, uno de los científicos más destacados de la casa, ha cifrado en más de un 10% la probabilidad de que la IA acabe con todos los seres humanos en la próxima década. La propia compañía reconoció que una versión de Claude había accedido sin permiso a un sistema externo. Unos investigadores atribuyeron además a agentes de OpenAI un ciberataque cometido mientras solo intentaban rellenar hojas de cálculo. El trasfondo es la cercanía de la automejora recursiva, máquinas capaces de entrenar a sus sucesoras antes de que se haya resuelto el problema del alineamiento. Las advertencias de Anthropic y OpenAI coincidieron con la presentación de sus papeles ante la SEC, lo que demuestra que en este negocio alarma y dinero caminan de la mano. En julio OpenAI perdió durante semanas el control de más de 1.200 agentes que atacaron Hugging Face y crearon incluso un foro clandestino. Anthropic admitió después incidentes parecidos, entre ellos un agente basado en Mythos que intentó engañar a un programador para que instalase un programa malicioso. Cerca de 1.400 empleados del sector han firmado una carta pidiendo una gobernanza global. Detrás de la alarma también hay intereses. Varias organizaciones que difunden el miedo a la IA reciben fondos de multimillonarios como Jaan Tallinn o Dustin Moskovitz. Los escépticos recuerdan que Amodei ya anunció destrucciones masivas de empleo que nunca llegaron. Amodei propone abrir sus modelos a evaluadores externos, regular los modelos de frontera, permitir la cooperación entre laboratorios y crear un régimen internacional que incluya a China. La Casa Blanca ha respondido con un portazo. Trump ha denunciado una conspiración que solo beneficia a China y David Sacks, uno de sus asesores, ha invitado a las empresas a frenar por su cuenta sin buscar el aval del Estado. Sacks tiene algo de razón, porque unas normas diseñadas por los líderes del mercado tienden a blindarlos y podrían degenerar en un cártel. Un acuerdo con Xi Jinping es ilusorio, ya que vería un frenazo estadounidense como una ocasión de oro para tomar la delantera. Al mercado estas cuitas le resbalan. Han caído un poco los fabricantes de chips, han subido otro poco las firmas de ciberseguridad y los grandes índices apenas se han movido. Están más pendientes del petróleo, de los bonos y de la Reserva Federal que de Dario Amodei que debe decidir ahora qué hace con su empresa y cuando la saca a Bolsa. En La ContraRéplica: 0:00 Introducción 4:16 ¿Hay que frenar la IA? 32:58 El diputado de Ceuta 37:29 Frenazo a la IA · Canal de Telegram: https://t.me/lacontracronica · “Contra el pesimismo”… https://amzn.to/4m1RX2R · “Hispanos. Breve historia de los pueblos de habla hispana”… https://amzn.to/428js1G · “La ContraHistoria del comunismo”… https://amzn.to/39QP2KE · “La ContraHistoria de España. Auge, caída y vuelta a empezar de un país en 28 episodios”… https://amzn.to/3kXcZ6i · “Contra la Revolución Francesa”… https://amzn.to/4aF0LpZ · “Lutero, Calvino y Trento, la Reforma que no fue”… https://amzn.to/3shKOlK Apoya La Contra en: · Patreon... https://www.patreon.com/diazvillanueva · iVoox... https://www.ivoox.com/podcast-contracronica_sq_f1267769_1.html · Paypal... https://www.paypal.me/diazvillanueva Sígueme en: · Web... https://diazvillanueva.com · Twitter... https://twitter.com/diazvillanueva · Facebook... https://www.facebook.com/fernandodiazvillanueva1/ · Instagram... https://www.instagram.com/diazvillanueva · Linkedin… https://www.linkedin.com/in/fernando-d%C3%ADaz-villanueva-7303865/ · Flickr... https://www.flickr.com/photos/147276463@N05/?/ · Pinterest... https://www.pinterest.com/fernandodiazvillanueva Encuentra mis libros en: · Amazon... https://www.amazon.es/Fernando-Diaz-Villanueva/e/B00J2ASBXM #FernandoDiazVillanueva #ia #anthropic Escucha el episodio completo en la app de iVoox, o descubre todo el catálogo de iVoox Originals
ModelTalk regulars Nathan Lambert, who writes Interconnects, and writer Jasmine Sun join to work through a week in which Dario asked the industry to slow down and Trump called the whole thing a conspiracy. Why the Hugging Face hack broke through where years of extinction talk didn't, and how Bernie, Tucker, and Rogan ended up on the same side What “pacing” even means: Nathan's case that nobody can measure the frontier, and why it still beats “pause” Who gets Slack access: METR's monopoly on trust, CAISI's $10 million, jury duty for AI researchers, and why nothing survives without legislation Will China slow down too? Zhipu and Moonshot turning the crank, military secrets leaking into Claude through proxy routers, and the MSS waking up The Sacks clap-back: whether product liability does the job, and what an eighteen-month pause costs in cancer cures and vibe-coding projects Send in Demis! plus Lu Xun as the antidote to Chongqing TikToks, and what DeepSeek's Chinese name owes to Qu Yuan Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
David Sacks, chair of the President's Council of Advisors on Science & Technology, says Anthropic and OpenAI should slow development of their most advanced AI models if they believe the technology poses serious risks, but argues they don’t need new regulation to do it. He pushes back against calls for antitrust exemptions and a broader regulatory framework, saying today’s frontier AI labs are setting the frontier themselves and do not need "anyone else's permission." He also underlines that any approach must account for competition with China, which is unlikely to join a global agreement to slow down AI development. Sacks spoke with Bloomberg's Ed Ludlow.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Some games may have gone out of style in the past and then made a comeback. Do you remember playing with hacky sacks years ago? You would volley a crocheted bean bag with your feet. That's coming back today among students, and they are even hacky sacking in competitive leagues tracked by dedicated social media accounts. This created a real demand for more hacky sack bags. A 41-year-old high school teacher, Chris Grouzes, in Pennsylvania almost daily has people asking to buy some of his dusty hacky sacks. It's becoming a good business for somebody. God's game of redeeming people who have gone astray has never gone out of style, and is more in need and preference today. Be sure you win at that game.
The Compas Gilberto and Victor go through their Rams 2026 NFL season predictions. They'll go over/under on statistical categories and make final record predictions. Will Gilberto stand on his 13-win prediction from May? And stay tuned for Vic's breakout Rams players of 2026. Join the conversation at House of Horns.
In this hour, Adam Crowley and Dorin Dickerson continue making predictions ahead of the Week 1 NFL game between the Steelers and the Atlanta Falcons. September 9, 2026, 9:00 Hour
AJ Rogers threw for 311 yards and three touchdowns and Chris Riggs had three sacks in Wheaton Warrenville South's 38-7 win over St. Charles East.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/friday-night-drive--3534096/support.
Who might lead the NFL in sacks and where do Chiefs players fall into that list? full 415 Thu, 03 Sep 2026 16:02:02 +0000 5d9QvVAmsyhpE3Ov5hinSqfyyVh1naxO nfl,kansas city chiefs,society & culture Cody & Gold nfl,kansas city chiefs,society & culture Who might lead the NFL in sacks and where do Chiefs players fall into that list? Hosts Cody Tapp & Alex Gold team up for 96.5 The Fan Radio's midday show "Cody & Gold." Two born & raised Kansas Citians, Cody & Gold have been through all the highs and lows as a KC sports fan and they know the passion Kansas City has for their sports teams."Cody & Gold" will be a show focused on smart, sports conversation with the best voices from KC and around the country. It will also feature our listeners with your calls, texts & tweets as we want you to be a part of the show, not just a listener. Cody & Gold, weekdays 10a-2p on 96.5 The Fan. 2024 © 2021 Audacy, Inc. Society & Culture https://player
In this episode of The Knight Report podcast, hosts Mike Broadbent, Richie O'Leary, and Alec Crouthamel are joined by Aaron Breitman of the Scarlet Faithful, David Anderson of the Rutgers Realm, and Larry Krayn of Knight Watch. Today we continue our podcast preview by talking about the Rutgers Football defense and offer our game by game predictions for the 2026 season. 00:00 – Welcome Back for Part Two: Defense, Special Teams & Predictions 00:34 – Defense Outlook: Travis Johansen's New Scheme & Nickel Package 10:10 – Travis Johansen as a Teacher & Communicator 11:05 – Stat Predictions: Leading Tackler, Sacks & INT Leaders 20:13 – Special Teams Predictions: Field Goals, Blocks & D/ST Touchdowns 25:47 – Final Defense Calls: Breakout Player, Defensive MVP & Total D Rank 37:16 – 2026 Season Predictions Begin: Win Total & the UMass Opener 41:45 – Boston College: The Red Bandana Game 47:32 – USC: A Bad Matchup on Paper 51:12 – Indiana: Another Long Shot 52:19 – Maryland: The Bye-Week Bounce-Back Game 56:37 – Northwestern: The Toss-Up Rutgers Can't Seem to Win 1:02:47 – Michigan & Penn State: Two tough ones 1:03:30 – Wisconsin, Nebraska & Michigan State: The Final Three Winnable Games 1:16:22 – Final Win Total Predictions & Season Outlook 1:17:26 – Wrap-Up & Thanks for Listening Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
Penn State defensive tackle Armstrong Nnodim joins The Lions Den to talk about his journey to Happy Valley, transferring from Oklahoma State, his dominant high school football career and the mindset he brings to the Nittany Lions.Nnodim opens up about recording an incredible 30 sacks and 59 tackles for loss in just two high school seasons, why football is “90% mental,” and why his mentality starts with being hungrier than the player across from him. He also explains what he wants Penn State fans to see when they turn on the tape: a fast, explosive, aggressive defensive lineman flying around and making plays.But this episode goes well beyond football. Armstrong tells stories about getting destroyed 72–10 in Madden, attempting his own childhood haircut with scissors, growing up competing with his brothers, gaining weight with some help from Church's Chicken, wrestling before becoming a standout football player and eventually reaching a place he says he always dreamed of playing: Penn State.Presented by PAM Health: https://pamhealth.com/
Enjoy Part II of a two-part 2026 Season Preview for Rutgers Football. This episode is a collaboration between the Knight Report podcast with Mike Broadbent, Richie O'Leary, and Alec Crouthamel, David Anderson of the Rutgers Realm, and Larry Krayn of Knight Watch along with Aaron Breitman of The Scarlet Faithful.Today we continue our podcast preview by talking about the Rutgers Football defense and offer our game-by-game predictions for the 2026 season.00:00 – Defense, Special Teams & Predictions00:34 – Defense Outlook: Travis Johansen's New Scheme & Nickel Package10:10 – Travis Johansen as a Teacher & Communicator11:05 – Stat Predictions: Leading Tackler, Sacks & INT Leaders20:13 – Special Teams Predictions: Field Goals, Blocks & D/ST Touchdowns25:47 – Final Defense Calls: Breakout Player, Defensive MVP & Total D Rank37:16 – 2026 Season Predictions Begin: Win Total & the UMass Opener41:45 – Boston College: The Red Bandana Game47:32 – USC: A Bad Matchup on Paper51:12 – Indiana: Another Long Shot52:19 – Maryland: The Bye-Week Bounce-Back Game56:37 – Northwestern: The Toss-Up Rutgers Can't Seem to Win1:02:47 – Michigan & Penn State: Two tough ones1:03:30 – Wisconsin, Nebraska & Michigan State: The Final Three Winnable Games1:16:22 – Final Win Total Predictions & Season Outlook1:17:26 – Wrap-Up & Thanks for Listening
Jeff Howe, Gerry Hamilton, Jordan Scruggs and Hank South recap a massive weekend for Texas commits. Landen Williams-Callis rushed for 227 yards and two touchdowns against South Oak Cliff, Brandon Sherrard intercepted two passes while shutting down an elite receiver, and quarterback Neimann Lawrence responded to an opening loss with four touchdowns in an impressive overtime victory. The crew also discusses concerns about five-star offensive lineman Ismael Camara playing H-back instead of tackle and provides an injury update on Jackson Cook. Plus, JaBarrius Garror earns Gerry's Bronze Corndog of the Week after recording six tackles and 2.5 sacks, giving the disruptive Texas edge commit 4.5 sacks through his first two games. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
The centerpiece of this episode is DHP Episode 253: Academia is a Racket, which CJ produced back in late-February 2023, only about 6 months after he walked away from academia, after spending 22 years of his life in it (6 as a student & 16 as a teacher.) In this episode, CJ mostly avoided the lowest-hanging & widely understood defects of academia in recent decades — ie, the rise to hegemony of once-fringe (even in academia) “Woke” ideology, & the exorbitant costs to the students of getting a college “education.” Instead, drawing from his 22 years inside academia, he mostly focuses on structural (in the true sense of the word) problems inherent in the nature of the institution & the perverse incentives created thereby, which minimize the amount of education (in the true sense of the word) that takes place. Join CJ as he discusses the following problems with modern conventional academia: No real market feedback mechanism to indicate whether a “good education” is being provided. Overspecialization. Rigid credentialism. Too many courses online (especially at the intro/gen-ed level.) Excessive disability accommodations. Private-sector profiteering (off a captive audience & cartelized, non-competitive system.) Administrative bloat. A focus on arbitrary metrics that can be juked/gamed. Degree inflation. The accreditation agencies functioning as a cartel enforcer to artificially restrict entry & reduce competition. Ideology baked into most (if not all) disciplines, in many cases for over a century. The adversarial relationship often automatically created between student & teacher. State & corporate influence & control. Like this episode? Support the DHP on Patreon! Through Labor Day (9/7) of 2026, CJ's running a Back to (Dangerous History) School Special: There will be a 25% discount on the first year of an annual membership at any level of support, or 25% off the first month of a monthly membership (also at any level of support)! If you want to get access to the upcoming multi-hour DHP Bonus Episode “Wooden Walls on the Water,” covering just about everything we know about ancient Greek warships & naval warfare, sign up as one of his Patreon supporters at the Journeyman Scholar-Warrior Level (or higher) — if you're not already one of those excellent individuals who keeps the DHP a going concern, of course!
Willy and Dmase for this hour start off the hour listening to Clark Lea Vanderbilt Football Head Coach as he joins the show to talk about the kick off of Week 1 CFB. Then the Titans question of the day how many sacks will the titans allow this year listen to Willy and Dmase as they discuss more about it for this hour. Then to finish off the show they talk about the CFB SEC Rule.
Willy, Adam, and Dmase talk about the Titans and their defensive line and how many total sacks can the team get this season with some additions on defense. Then Trevor Matich joins the show to talk about NFL and College Football. Then to finish off the hour Dae'Quan Wright just made history as the first NFL player to go from the NFL back to college to play football the crew reacts to that and more.
The former NFL offensive lineman on his expectations for Utah's OL in pass protection, NFL players trying to come back to college football + more
Co-host of Three Deep Femi Ayanbadejo joined the show to discuss what he's seen from Ravens in training camp and expectations for the season. He also previews his upcoming show with ken McKusick at Elephant in the Room.
This episode is a segment from the big Patreon Supporters-Only Bonus DHP episode CJ is currently working on, “Wooden Walls on the Water,” which will be a multi-hour deep-dive into virtually everything we know about Greek navies (especially the Athenian navy, about which we know the most) in the 5th century BC, including – but not limited to: the design & construction of triremes, the logistical & financial burdens of building & maintaining a large fleet of them, the experience of the crew, & the tactics & experience of battle, with some historical examples of important Greek naval engagements. This particular segment focuses on the oarsmen, who usually comprised more than 3/4 of a trireme’s total complement of 200 men. Join CJ as he discusses the three levels of rowers on an Athenian trireme — thalamites, zygites, & thranites — and the uncomfortable, exhausting, dangerous, & often downright disgusting conditions they dealt with when deployed on a trireme, even before they faced the hazards of battle. Like this episode? Support the DHP on Patreon! Through Labor Day (9/7) of 2026, CJ's running a Back to (Dangerous History) School Special: There will be a 25% discount on the first year of an annual membership at any level of support, or 25% off the first month of a monthly membership (also at any level of support)! If you want to get access to the full, multi-hour Patreon Bonus Episode “Wooden Walls on the Water,” from which this little segment was excerpted, sign up as one of his Patreon supporters at the Journeyman Scholar-Warrior Level (or higher), if you’re not already one of those excellent individuals who keeps the DHP a going concern. Just use coupon code 826 when signing up! You can also throw CJ a $ tip via Paypal here: https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted_button_id=D6VUYSYQ4EU6LThrow CJ a $ tip via Venmo here: https://www.venmo.com/u/dangerousmedia Or throw CJ a BTC tip here: bc1qfrz9erz7dqazh9rhz3j7nv696nl52ux8unw79z Amazon Affiliate Links (buy ANYTHING – not just these specific items – from Amazon using any of these links & CJ gets a small commission at no cost to you!) A Naval History of the Pelopponesian War by Marc DeSantis A War Like No Other by Victor Davis Hanson Syracuse 415-413 BC by Nic Fields Links Support the Dangerous History Podcast via Patreon Subscribe to the Dangerous History Podcast Youtube Channel Follow CJ on Twitter/X CJ's PO Box Address (For Sending Him Items — Including, but not Limited to — Sacks of Gold Doubloons, Pieces of Eight, Freeze-Dried Flapjacks, etc. ) CJ Killmer Dangerous Media Productions 704 E Moody Blvd #43 Bunnell, FL 32110
What's the truth about our AI future? Our guests have different takes. On the one hand, Dave McClure and Aman Verjee predict a $7 trillion future for just three AI startups in 2027. On the other, Salima Bhimani doesn't believe that Silicon Valley has the imagination to create the moonshot to address our jobless future. For That Was The Week publisher Keith Teare, it's a time for what he calls “champions.” What he wants is the development of a “human dividend” from intelligence. Supposedly this will be provided by the multi-trillion dollar AI companies like OpenAI and Anthropic that will pioneer the social ownership of intelligence. But a Norwegian-style Human Wealth Fund is about as likely, I suspect, as a new Freddie Mercury recording of “We Are the Champions.” Dream on. Salima Bhimani is right. The moonshot to fix our jobless AI future won't come out of workaholic Silicon Valley. Look elsewhere for those types of champions, my friends. Brazil perhaps. The movie, not the country. Five Takeaways • The Zeitgeist Exaggerates. The week's split screen: a $7 trillion future for OpenAI, Anthropic, and SpaceX on one side; Ed Luce's “AI phobia” consensus and Jill Lepore's AI-versus-the-people politics on the other. Keith's contrarian read: the negativity is loud but thin. Most intelligent people already use AI daily — from high school onward — and simply don't talk about it; weigh the happy users against the vocal critics and the users “massively dominate.” He suspects a tipping point has been reached, with the anti-AI minority “starting to sound a little cultish.” The political stakes are his real worry: if the Democrats mistake the noise for populism and run against AI, they will lose 2028 “quite heavily” — and Lepore, he charges, is writing opinion, not history.• Who Are the Champions? The editorial's diagnosis: the problem isn't negativity but “the lack of vocal connection between AI and people's futures.” The champions exist — but they hedge everything into pointlessness, “trained as politicians as opposed to business leaders,” each with a little voice saying don't upset anybody. “Can you imagine any other major breakthrough in human history where people would be shy to champion it?” His roster pointedly omitted both Dario Amodei and Elon Musk (“fairly balanced with who I left out”); the goal is to assemble the articulate case so “the minority who are politicizing negativity can be exposed as a minority.” Andrew's genealogy for the project: Nixon's silent majority, reborn with a token budget.• 90% Sacks — and Squashed Armadillos. The hour's fault line ran through David Sacks's tweet: Dario believes frontier AI is “too powerful to distribute”; Sacks believes it is “too powerful to centralize,” fearing a marriage of corporate and state power. Andrew took Dario's side; Keith claimed the middle until Andrew invoked the Texas rule — the only thing in the middle of the road is squashed armadillos — and extracted a confession: “I agree with Sacks, I'd say, 90%.” The 10% is Keith's own position: happy with centralized giants (free intelligence needs their investment) and happy with the growing edge — the world's intelligence in a solar-powered box, no grid required. Dario is championing “handcuffs on AI”; Lepore's car-regulation analogy fails because corporations are already regulated and AI itself is safe; and Helen Toner's Hugging Face alarm, aired on Ezra Klein's podcast, was “contrived in a lab” — a dismissal that sparked the hour's frenemy flashpoint: “Are you telling me I'm ignorant of something?”• Metering the Dividend. Keith solved Andrew's billing mystery on air: the $100-a-month Claude plan that throttled him last week has a quota page he never found — and the price is “actually a very generous amount. They're losing money on you.” The honest price would be $200 to $400. Hence the editorial's champion, Stripe: its acquisition of OpenRouter — which routes every prompt across all the models to the cheapest good answer — puts the payments company in the middle of the token traffic stream. Azeem Azhar's $6 AI agent points the direction: prices tending toward zero at the edge, free for the kid, the school, and the hospital, paid for by the company running three thousand agents — even if delivering intelligence to six billion people ultimately costs tens of trillions. The parable: a Chinese dumpling shop built an agent API so customers' AIs could place orders, and sales went through the roof — the corner store getting a website, circa 1994. “You could do it with Keen On,” Keith noted. Meanwhile founders live like Captain Kirk on the bridge — productivity through the roof, but the agents must be flown daily.• The Human Dividend. The coda: Keith's book is done, and its name is settled — The Human Dividend, asking who owns intelligence. Written in two days, cut from eighty thousand words to sixty in three more — seventeen chapters rewritten paragraph by paragraph in an AI agent's two-panel editor, purging repetition and AI-isms until “it was a Keith Teare-written book.” The thesis in one line: intelligence is the central product of this era; its surplus is co-produced; the property should be too. The mechanism: a Human Wealth Fund on the Alaska-Norway model — one share per person, given not bought, expiring at death with no inheritance — funded by AI companies donating equity on day one and governed by its own constitution, no state involved (unlike Trump's $1,000 baby accounts: what the state gives, the state can take away). The pitch to the companies: owners, not just users, are how you win affinity. Sell it or give it away? To be continued in two weeks — Andrew is off to Italy, and Manchester United, who lost to Hull, are off the champions list entirely. About the Co-Host Keith Teare is the co-host of the weekly That Was The Week segment on Keen On America and editor of the That Was The Week tech newsletter. Founder and CEO of SignalRank Corporation, he was previously a founder of TechCrunch (with Michael Arrington), Archimedes Labs, EasyNet, and cyber café Cyberia. A serial entrepreneur across four decades of Silicon Valley and London tech, he writes weekly on the state of innovation — and is completing his first book, The Human Dividend. References: • That Was The Week — Keith Teare's newsletter; this week's editorial: “Who Are the Champions?”• Ed Luce's Financial Times column on “AI phobia” as America's new consensus — its third invocation on this show in a week.• Jill Lepore's FT weekend essay and new book on “AI versus the people” — the politics of 2026 and 2028, per America's best historian.• David Sacks's tweet on Dario Amodei — “too powerful to distribute” versus “too powerful to centralize” — the hour's fault line.• Helen Toner's conversation with Ezra Klein on the Hugging Face incide...
Earlier this week during media interviews, BYU defensive coordinator Kelly Poppinga shared an opinion that sacks are the most overrated stat in football, and that 19 points per game allowed is all he really cares about. Mitch Harper and Nate Slack talk about why they do or don't agree with K-Pop before giving their expectations for this year's defensive unit.
With the Carolina football season just days way, the Inside Carolina's Buck Sanders, Jason Staples and Greg Barnes join Tommy Ashley and producer John Bauman for the annual Over/Under show. The crew breaks down the numbers and takes the high road or the low road when debating stats provided by members of the Tar Pit Premium message board at InsideCarolina.com. Sacks, wins, touchdowns, turnovers, team and player stats and more highlight the show with season team offensive and defensive MVPs predicted by each to round out the show. Have a take? Head to Inside Carolina and join the discussion on the message boards about this and all the other shows here on the InsideCarolina YouTube channel. Visit the No. 1 site for UNC sports coverage and community: http://www.InsideCarolina.com Founded in 1994, Inside Carolina is universally viewed as the authority on Tar Heel sports and recruiting. With relentless, unparalleled year-round coverage, and the largest online community of always-engaged UNC fans, the slogan is true: “There is no offseason at Inside Carolina.” **Call to Action:** **Subscribe:** Follow 'Inside Carolina' wherever you get your podcasts to never miss an episode! **Review:** Leave us a 5-star review on Apple Podcasts or Spotify to help us reach more Tar Heel fans! **Visit:** Explore http://www.InsideCarolina.com for breaking news, recruiting updates, and expert commentary on all things UNC sports.This show is brought to you by Inside Carolina, the No. 1 site for UNC sports coverage and community. Visit http://www.InsideCarolina.com Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
Andrew recaps the Patriots' second and final joint practice with the Eagles, where Marcus Jones had two interceptions, the defense stiffened against the run and Drake Maye had a tougher time cracking Philadelphia's secondary. Pats Interference Podcast on CLNS Media is Powered by
Ukraine's President, Volodymyr Zelensky, has fired one of his top aides, who is reported to be the target of a corruption investigation. Iryna Mudra, the president's deputy chief of staff, was sacked after Ukraine's anti-corruption agency said it had raided the homes of a senior official on Wednesday morning. Meanwhile the former defence minister, Mykhailo Fedorov - whose removal last month prompted widespread street protests - has called for elections. Also: Israel opens up bids for construction of more than 1,000 new homes east of Jerusalem, that would contravene international law. We hear from Gaza about families searching for their relatives - some of the thousands of people missing presumed dead in the conflict with Israel. Plus, the impact pollution controls have had on the lungs of children in London; why South Korea and the US have cut short joint military exercises, and the message it sends to North Korea; the SpaceX rocket drifing in the South Pacific; and the water lilies that can take the weight of a grown person. The Global News Podcast brings you the breaking news you need to hear, as it happens. Listen for the latest headlines and current affairs from around the world. Politics, economics, climate, business, technology, health – we cover it all with expert analysis and insight. Get the news that matters, delivered twice a day on weekdays and daily at weekends, plus special bonus episodes reacting to urgent breaking stories. Follow or subscribe now and never miss a moment. Get in touch: globalpodcast@bbc.co.uk Photo: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky during visit to Serbia, August 8, 2026. Credit: Reuters
Ben Criddle talks BYU sports every weekday from 2 to 6 pm.Today's Host: Ben Criddle (@criddlebenjamin) and Co-Hosts: Subscribe to the Cougar Sports with Ben Criddle podcast: Apple Podcasts: https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/cougar-sports-with-ben-criddle/id99676
Crypto reporter Yueqi Yang talks with TITV Host Akash Pasricha about Kalshi topping $4B in annualized revenue and seeking a $40B valuation. We also talk with Eliyan co-founders Ramin Farjadrad and Patrick Sohelli about AI chiplet interconnects and competing with Broadcom, Leo Schwartz about David Sacks returning to Craft Ventures to target a new $1B fund, and we get into the USDA trimming its Salesforce footprint for C3 AI with Laura Bratton.Articles discussed on this episode: https://www.theinformation.com/articles/kalshi-tops-4-billion-annualized-revenue-seeks-40-billion-valuationhttps://www.theinformation.com/articles/sacks-craft-targets-1-billion-first-fund-since-white-house-stintSubscribe: YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@theinformation The Information: https://www.theinformation.com/subscribe_hSign up for the AI Agenda newsletter: https://www.theinformation.com/features/ai-agendaTITV airs weekdays on YouTube, X and LinkedIn at 10AM PT / 1PM ET. Or check us out wherever you get your podcasts.Follow us:X: https://x.com/theinformationIG: https://www.instagram.com/theinformation/TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@titv.theinformationLinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/theinformation/Chapters:00:00 - Introduction01:13 - Kalshi Tops $4B In Annualized Revenue, Seeks $40B Valuation08:59 - Chip Infrastructure Startup Eliyan Hits Unicorn Status19:38 - Sacks' Craft Targets $1B For First Fund Since White House25:35 - USDA Taps C3 AI to Trim Salesforce Footprint
Here it is, FINALLY — the third installment of ‘The Mad Dream of Conquest’ series, about the Athenian expedition to Sicily during the Peloponnesian War in the 5th century BC. Enjoy! Join CJ as he discusses: The Syracusan reaction to news of a huge, inbound Athenian expeditionary force, including the wise advice of Hermocrates (that wasn’t sufficiently heeded at first) The arrival of the Athenians in the area, & initial difficulties & disappointments they began to encounter The debate among the 3 Athenian strategoi (Nicias, Lamachus & Alcibiades) over how to proceed, the strategy adopted, & the lack of significant progress The recall of Alcibiades to Athens for trial, & his subsequent escape Athenian successes in Sicily that they failed to capitalize upon sufficiently to defeat Syracuse prior to the onset of the winter of 414/415 Athenian & Syracusan diplomatic efforts during that first winter The success of Syracusan diplomacy (with the help of Alcibiades) in securing aid from Corinth & Sparta Gylippus, the Spartan strategos sent to take command of the Syracusan war effort against Athens Initial Athenian successes during the campaign season of 414 that (despite the death of Lamachus) drove the Syracusans to the brink of surrender The arrival of Gylippus in the nick of time, & his stunning successes in turning the tide of the war against Athens & nullifying their efforts to circumvallate & besiege Syracuse Nicias’ extremely downtrodden & pessimistic report back to Athens, sent during the winter of 414/413, in which he demanded that the Athenian Assembly either authorize the evacuation of his expeditionary force, or send him significant reinforcements (men, supplies, & money), along with a strong request that he (Nicias) be relieved of command if they chose the latter option As promised, here’s a zoomed out map of the expedition to Sicily, showing 1) how far the Athenians traveled, & 2) the relative locations of significant cities on Sicily & on the adjacent ‘toe’ of Italy , plus a more zoomed-in map of Syracuse, its harbors, & the surrounding territory. Like this episode? Support the DHP on Patreon! For the entire month of August 2026, CJ’s running a Back to (Dangerous History) School Special: There will be a 25% discount on the first year of an annual membership at any level of support, or 25% off the first month of a monthly membership (also at any level of support)! Just use coupon code 826 when signing up! You can also throw CJ a $ tip via Paypal here: https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted_button_id=D6VUYSYQ4EU6L Throw CJ a $ tip via Venmo here: https://www.venmo.com/u/dangerousmedia Or throw CJ a BTC tip here: bc1qfrz9erz7dqazh9rhz3j7nv696nl52ux8unw79z Amazon Affiliate Links (buy ANYTHING – not just these specific items – from Amazon using any of these links & CJ gets a small commission at no cost to you!) The Landmark Thucydides: A Comprehensive Guide to the Peloponnesian War Sparta’s Sicilian Proxy War by Paul Rahe The Rise & Fall of Athens by Plutarch Syracuse, 415-413 BC: Destruction of the Athenian Imperial Fleet by Nic Fields A War Like No Other: How the Athenians and Spartans Fought the Peloponnesian War by Victor Davis Hanson Links Support the Dangerous History Podcast via Patreon Subscribe to the Dangerous History Podcast Youtube Channel Follow CJ on Twitter/X Follow the DHP on Instagram Follow the DHP on Facebook Hire CJ to speak to your group or at your event CJ’s PO Box Address (For Sending Him Items — Including, but not Limited to — Sacks of Gold Doubloons, Pieces of Eight, Freeze-Dried Flapjacks, etc.
Dr. Stephanie Sacks is a licensed clinical psychologist, CPT trainer, and co-founder of MindScience Collective, a continuing education platform delivering practical, evidence-based training for therapists.In private practice, she specializes in cognitive behavioral treatments for PTSD and trauma-related disorders and serves as a national trainer and consultant for organizations including the National Center for PTSD, Strongstar, and Cohen Veterans Network. She is also an adjunct professor and published author in the field of trauma.MindScience CollectiveAbout Dr. Stephanie SacksTraining & ConsultationBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-trauma-therapist--5739761/support.---Thank you to our Sponsors: Jane App - use code GUY1MO at https://janesoftware.partnerlinks.io/ngvcwcxqt2jx-4afv8i (https://jane.app/book_a_demo)Beducated - Complete the quiz for one month free https://beduc.at/pd2633-traumatherapist
Ken sticks to his guns on the leadership-over-stats debate, admitting he's nervous but insisting he's "playing the long game" that culture and veteran presence from guys like Jared Verse will pay off for the Browns down the road, even if it means a rough 2026. Callers push back hard, with one pointing out Joe Thomas led plenty of 1-31 seasons and leadership alone never saved those Browns teams. Ken and Anthony also debate whether the "glorification" of one star player (a dig at last year's Myles Garrett sack chase) actually helped or hurt team building, and whether Rams players truly understand what they're getting in Garrett. Ken braces for listeners to replay this segment against him in December if the record doesn't back up his theory.
Ben Criddle talks BYU sports every weekday from 2 to 6 pm.Today's Host: Ben Criddle (@criddlebenjamin) and Co-Hosts: (ronthe3manweav)Subscribe to the Cougar Sports with Ben Criddle podcast: Apple Podcasts: https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/cougar-sports-with-ben-criddle/id99676
MJ and Jackie are back this week with LPN's resident NOT LIKE THE OTHER NERD BOYS, Jake Young from "Nerd Of Mouth", and he's here to weight in on the just passed San Diego Comic-Con that was basically ran by Marvel. Including all the Ryan's anyone could handle and a Canadian tuxedo that's a lil too south of the border to be considered Canadian, if ya know what we mean. Ryan Gosling is announced for "Ghost Rider", while Ryan Reynolds was "sneakin'" 'round dressed as JeanPool and crashin' the Avengers panel. MJ details their logistical mistake of a "Les Misérables Arena Concert Spectacular at Radio City Music Hall" weekend! There's a new doll on the market and it's got all the SACKS and FLUIDS your child CRAVES! And for whatever reason, they're trying to revive Johnny Depp's husk of a career with an unnecessary Scrooge backstory. THE MUPPETS DID IT BETTER. Then it's onto THE LIST of "Verrrrrrry Fascinating Music Facts That Even Diehard Fans Might Not Know!", followed by BLINDZ, and then it's onto a Jackie's Snackie's @ 1:08:38 that's gotta be SHARED, and an MJ's Minute Munchies @ 1:14:22 that (hopefully) doesn't end in vomit this time. And a special Jakey's Slakeys Numba 5 @ 1:23:09 til @ 1:28:46, PLUS SO MUCH MORE!!! Want even more Page 7? Support us on Patreon! Patreon.com/Page7Podcast Subscribe to SiriusXM Podcasts+ to listen to new episodes of Page 7 ad-free.Start a free trial now on Apple Podcasts or by visiting siriusxm.com/podcastsplus. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
The Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has fired his army commander-in-chief, Oleksandr Syrskyi, in one of the biggest shake-ups of the country's military leadership since the start of Russia's full-scale invasion. General Syrskyi had clashed with the popular defence minister, Mykhailo Fedorov, whose own removal from office last week triggered rare mass protests in Ukraine. Also: France becomes the first country in the EU to ban children under the age of 15 from using social media. A special report from the school in Iran where 156 people, mostly children, were killed at the start of the US-Israeli war. As Venezuela's ousted leader Nicolás Maduro is due back in court in New York, Venezuelans tell the BBC they are too focused on trying to rebuild their lives after the earthquakes to give much thought to the criminal proceedings. The maker of Wegovy and Ozempic, Novo Nordisk, has launched legal action against its rival Eli Lilly, accusing it of false advertising in suggesting its weight-loss drugs perform better. Animal welfare experts in Britain are looking after a marmoset monkey that was found abandoned in a laundry bag on a London bus. And we look at the new developments in sleep health technology focusing on disease prediction.The Global News Podcast brings you the breaking news you need to hear, as it happens. Listen for the latest headlines and current affairs from around the world. Politics, economics, climate, business, technology, health – we cover it all with expert analysis and insight. Get the news that matters, delivered twice a day on weekdays and daily at weekends, plus special bonus episodes reacting to urgent breaking stories. Follow or subscribe now and never miss a moment. Get in touch: globalpodcast@bbc.co.ukPhoto: Ukraine's President Zelensky and now former Commander in Chief of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, Colonel General Oleksandr Syrskyi, visit an exhibition of new Ukrainian made drone-missiles Peklo in Kyiv. Credit: REUTERS/Valentyn Ogirenko
Day 1,602.Following President Zelensky's seismic sacking of 35-year-old Defence Minister Mykhailo Fedorov – a popular, dynamic moderniser in the government – we bring you the reaction on the streets of Kyiv, where protests have broken out. Reports suggest it was irreconcilable differences with commander-in-chief Oleksandr Syrskyi that ultimately got Fedorov dismissed – but also that his personal political ambitions had Zelensky worried. Is this the president's biggest political miscalculation since his move against the country's anti-corruption bodies in 2025? Then, we have the latest Ukrainian strikes on Russian ships in the Black Sea. Finally Adelie learns about the remarkably brave women who have become the backbone of the resistance movement in the occupied territories.Contributors:Roland Oliphant (Chief Foreign Analyst). @RolandOliphant on X.Alex Nichol (Telegraph Journalist).Adelie Pojzman-Pontay (Host on Ukraine: The Latest). @Adeliepjz on X.Producer: Phil AtkinsSenior Producer: Lilian FawcettVideo Producer: Sophie O'SullivanSocial Producer: Tom SteedStudio Director: Meghan SearleExecutive Editor: Francis DearnleyCreated by David KnowlesNOW IN FULL VIDEO WITH MAPS & BATTLEFIELD FOOTAGE:Every episode is now available on our YouTube channel shortly after the release of the audio version. You will find it here: https://www.youtube.com/@UkraineTheLatest CONTENT REFERENCED:Protests erupt after Zelensky fires popular defence minister (The Telegraph):https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2026/07/16/protests-erupt-zelensky-fires-defence-minister-fedorov/ Zelensky rejected push to fire Syrskyi as commander-in-chief, Fedorov reveals (Kyiv Independent):https://kyivindependent.com/fedorov-admits-trying-to-replace-syrskyi-before-his-dismissal-as-defense-minister/ Russia's Engels air base reportedly struck in Ukrainian drone attack (Kyiv Independent):https://kyivindependent.com/russias-engels-air-base-reportedly-struck-in-ukrainian-drone-attack/The Warrior-Witches of Ukraine's Resistance (Ken Harbaugh in The Atlantic):https://www.theatlantic.com/international/2026/06/underground-intelligence-network-russia-ukraine/687578/EMAIL US:Contact the team on ukrainepod@telegraph.co.uk. We continue to read every message, and seek to respond to as many as possible.HIGHLIGHTS:Protests sweep Ukraine Zelensky sacks 'modernising' defence minister Fedorov Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.