POPULARITY
11 episodes with Oliver Sacks
3 episodes with Oliver Sacks
6 episodes with Oliver Sacks
3 episodes with Oliver Sacks
5 episodes with Oliver Sacks
4 episodes with Oliver Sacks
2 episodes with Oliver Sacks
6 episodes with Oliver Sacks
4 episodes with Oliver Sacks
Memory runs deeper than facts—it's how we stay rooted in faith, identity, and love. Jesus promises the Holy Spirit as a living reminder, guiding us back to his words. From ancient genealogies to remembering cucumbers in Egypt, scripture shows how memory shapes desire, regret, and belonging. In moments of deep spiritual connection, like Jimmy in Oliver Sacks' account, memory transcends biology—soul and spirit align, and we remember who we truly are.Join the conversation in our FB Group: https://www.facebook.com/share/g/1CnqywVp9s/Become New is here to help you grow spiritually one day at a time.John's new book STEPS is out! Check it out here: https://becomenew.com/steps/Want to work the steps with a friend or small group? Visit: DoTheSteps.com
Ti do il benvenuto su Italiano bello, il podcast in italiano semplice pensato per chi vuole imparare l'italiano o semplicemente migliorare. Tutti gli episodi sono disponibili in formato video sul mio canale YouTube, dove puoi attivare i sottotitoli.Ecco cosa puoi fare dopo aver ascoltato l'episodio:
Hallucinationer är vanligare än vi tror. Varför ser och hör vi sådant som inte finns? Lyssna på alla avsnitt i Sveriges Radio Play. Vad händer i hjärnan när vi hallucinerar? Hur ska vi tolka intryck som inte har någon grund i världen utanför? Och hur förklarar man det till synes oförklarliga?Utifrån neurologen och författaren Oliver Sacks bok ”Hallucinations” från 2012 diskuterar vi allt från nära döden-upplevelser till LSD-trippar och hypnopompa uppenbarelser.Gäster är Lena Nordlund - vetenskapsradion, Pontus Wasling - neurolog och författare, och Rickard Sjöberg - professor i neurokirurgi och författare.Producent och programledare är Viktor Hariz.
“ I'm fascinated by the extremes of the human experience, partly because it is so far removed from our own experience of life. In another way, when you look at people who have neurological disorders or diseases, these are really nature's experiments. They are ways of trying to understand how the brain works for all of us. By extrapolation from looking at these extremes, we can learn about the workings of our own brains. That's very much the case across all the areas of my work, whether it be sleep disorders, neurology, or epilepsy—how we regulate our emotions, how we move, how we experience the world.I never intended to be a storyteller; I intended to be a story listener, which is what we do daily in our clinics. Telling these stories generates empathy, creates understanding, and hopefully inspires the next generation to pursue careers as doctors, psychologists, and healthcare professionals, fostering a fascination with the brain similar to what Oliver Sacks did for me.”Dr. Guy Leschziner is the author of The Nocturnal Brain, The Man Who Tasted Words, and other books. He is a consultant neurologist and a Professor of Neurology and Sleep Medicine at the Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London. He sees patients with a range of neurological and sleep disorders, and is actively involved in research and teaching. He has presented series on sleep and neurology for BBC World Service and Radio 4. His latest book is Seven Deadly Sins: The Biology of Being Human.Episode Websitewww.creativeprocess.info/podInstagram:@creativeprocesspodcast
“ I'm fascinated by the extremes of the human experience, partly because it is so far removed from our own experience of life. In another way, when you look at people who have neurological disorders or diseases, these are really nature's experiments. They are ways of trying to understand how the brain works for all of us. By extrapolation from looking at these extremes, we can learn about the workings of our own brains. That's very much the case across all the areas of my work, whether it be sleep disorders, neurology, or epilepsy—how we regulate our emotions, how we move, how we experience the world.I never intended to be a storyteller; I intended to be a story listener, which is what we do daily in our clinics. Telling these stories generates empathy, creates understanding, and hopefully inspires the next generation to pursue careers as doctors, psychologists, and healthcare professionals, fostering a fascination with the brain similar to what Oliver Sacks did for me.”Dr. Guy Leschziner is the author of The Nocturnal Brain, The Man Who Tasted Words, and other books. He is a consultant neurologist and a Professor of Neurology and Sleep Medicine at the Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London. He sees patients with a range of neurological and sleep disorders, and is actively involved in research and teaching. He has presented series on sleep and neurology for BBC World Service and Radio 4. His latest book is Seven Deadly Sins: The Biology of Being Human.Episode Websitewww.creativeprocess.info/podInstagram:@creativeprocesspodcast
“ I'm fascinated by the extremes of the human experience, partly because it is so far removed from our own experience of life. In another way, when you look at people who have neurological disorders or diseases, these are really nature's experiments. They are ways of trying to understand how the brain works for all of us. By extrapolation from looking at these extremes, we can learn about the workings of our own brains. That's very much the case across all the areas of my work, whether it be sleep disorders, neurology, or epilepsy—how we regulate our emotions, how we move, how we experience the world.I never intended to be a storyteller; I intended to be a story listener, which is what we do daily in our clinics. Telling these stories generates empathy, creates understanding, and hopefully inspires the next generation to pursue careers as doctors, psychologists, and healthcare professionals, fostering a fascination with the brain similar to what Oliver Sacks did for me.”Dr. Guy Leschziner is the author of The Nocturnal Brain, The Man Who Tasted Words, and other books. He is a consultant neurologist and a Professor of Neurology and Sleep Medicine at the Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London. He sees patients with a range of neurological and sleep disorders, and is actively involved in research and teaching. He has presented series on sleep and neurology for BBC World Service and Radio 4. His latest book is Seven Deadly Sins: The Biology of Being Human.Episode Websitewww.creativeprocess.info/podInstagram:@creativeprocesspodcast
A few musician friends were asking me how I grew my project. In this pod, I go through the mindset and perspective that worked well for me, as well as a bit of psychology I learned from Oliver Sacks' "This Is Your Brain on Music."For 30% off your first year with DistroKid to share your music with the world click DistroKid.com/vip/lovemusicmoreWant to hear my music? For all things links visit ScoobertDoobert.pizzaSubscribe to this pod's blog on Substack to receive deeper dives on the regular
The Jer talks to Emma Woods about a recent odd experience involving abduction-related and hallucinatory phenomena. Together, they discuss whether one's state of consciousness during an abduction differs if it's physical or nonphysical. If so, do phenomena surrounding an experience differ? All of this is couched in Oliver Sacks' book, Hallucinations. Then, The Jer gets into his meditative experience from just last night and discusses some new twists on Trickster and the abduction scenario. (originally aired: 03.01.2013)
Nicolas Carreau rencontre Catherine Clément, philosophe et écrivaine, dans sa bibliothèque. Elle partage sa passion pour les neurosciences, inspirée par Oliver Sacks, et évoque son roman "Léonore ou l'amour conjugal", inspiré de la vie de Beethoven.Notre équipe a utilisé un outil d'Intelligence artificielle via les technologies d'Audiomeans© pour accompagner la création de ce contenu écrit.Distribué par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.
Send us a textBob Ewing is the founder of the Ewing School and hosts a Substack called Talking Big Ideas (go check it out). He has also gifted me most of the great books that I've read. Today, we talk about how he got started and how many of the great lessons in life are learned. We talk about counter-intuitive ideas, how to find the answers to them, and how to effectively communicate them. He talks to us about kettle bells and quotes (almost) every great author under the sun. Support the showNever miss another AdamSmithWorks update.Follow us on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.
Jann Arden speaks with Lisa Genova, a renowned author and neuroscientist, about her unexpected pivot from studying the brain to writing impactful fiction that explores neurological conditions. They discuss Genova's personal experiences with Alzheimer's in her family, the importance of empathy in understanding mental illness, and her latest novel, 'More or Less Maddy,' which tackles bipolar disorder. The discussion also touches on the challenges of being a single parent and wisdom for aspiring writers. More About Lisa: Acclaimed as the Oliver Sacks of fiction and the Michael Crichton of brain science, Lisa Genova is the New York Times bestselling author of Still Alice, Left Neglected, Love Anthony, Inside the O'Briens, and Remember: The Science of Memory and the Art of Forgetting. Still Alice was adapted into an Oscar–winning film starring Julianne Moore, Alec Baldwin, and Kristen Stewart. Lisa graduated valedictorian from Bates College with a degree in biopsychology and holds a PhD in neuroscience from Harvard University. She is featured in the documentary films To Not Fade Away and Have You Heard About Greg. Her TED talks on Alzheimer's disease and memory have been viewed over eleven million times. https://www.lisagenova.com/ *Episode photo credit Greg Mentzer* Leave us a voicenote! https://jannardenpod.com/voicemail/ Get access to bonus content and more on Patreon: https://patreon.com/JannArdenPod Order ONLYJANNS Merch: https://cutloosemerch.ca/collections/jann-arden Connect with us: www.jannardenpod.com www.instagram.com/jannardenpod www.facebook.com/jannardenpod Chapters (00:00) Introduction to Lisa Genova (02:50) The Journey from Neuroscience to Fiction (05:59) Understanding Alzheimer's Through Personal Experience (09:01) The Power of Fiction in Creating Empathy (11:58) Breaking the Stigma of Memory Loss (14:49) Exploring Bipolar Disorder in 'More or Less Maddie' (17:54) Maddie's Journey: Identity and Mental Health (21:13) Writing with Accessibility and Emotion (22:45) The Influence of Acting on Writing (25:42) Growing Up and Parental Influence (28:57) Navigating Multiple Film Projects (30:30) Balancing Writing and Parenting (33:43) The Joys and Challenges of Book Tours (36:19) Finding Connection in Caregiving Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
As the Senate prepares to vote on the Republican budget, Harold Meyerson talks about what's at stake for Democrats who join Chuck Schumer in voting with Republicans, and the great majority in the opposition. Plus: unions take Trump to court over firings.Also: The Supreme Court ruled against Trump last week in the first test of his refusal to release money appropriated by Congress, and more than a dozen more similar cases are likely to come before the court –– probably including a challenge to his withholding hundreds of millions from research universities on the grounds that they have failed to protect Jewish students from antisemitism. Erwin Chemerinsky comments –– he's dean of the Law School at UC Berkeley.Plus: from the archives: Oliver Sacks recalls Tripping in Topanga (recorded in 2012, he died three years later).
Oliver Sacks, neurolog och bästsäljande författare, blev känd redan på 1980-talet. Men han väntade tills han var över 80 innan han berättade sanningen om sitt liv. Lyssna på alla avsnitt i Sveriges Radio Play. Oliver Sacks var älskad över hela världen för sitt speciella sätt att skriva om personer med ovanliga hjärnor, bland annat i boken Uppvaknanden och Mannen som förväxlade sin hustru med en hatt.Det är tio år sedan han dog men hans arv lever vidare. Nu är han aktuell igen, för en ny bok med hans brev som kommit ut postumt, och för en tv-serie som just nu visas i Sverige. Och både i den senaste boken och hans självbiografi som kom strax innan han dog får lära känna sidor av honom som han höll hemliga i hela livet.Lena Nordlund träffade Kate Edgar, VD för Oliver Sacks Foundation i New York, som jobbade med honom i 30 år och kanske är den som kände honom bäst.Reporter: Lena Nordlundlena.nordlund@sr.seProducent: Lars Broströmlars.brostrom@sr.se
The Strange Case of Jane O. by Karen Thompson Walker is a mesmerizing story about motherhood, memory and complicated family ties based on case notes from Oliver Sacks. Walker joins us to talk about returning to the theme of time in her work, her writing process, her teaching career and more with Miwa Messer, host of Poured Over. This episode of Poured Over was hosted by Miwa Messer and mixed by Harry Liang. New episodes land Tuesdays and Thursdays (with occasional Saturdays) here and on your favorite podcast app. Featured Books (Episode): The Strange Case of Jane O. by Karen Thompson Walker The Dreamers by Karen Thompson Walker The Age of Miracles by Karen Thompson Walker Blindness by José Saramago Station Eleven by Emily St. John Mandel Never Let Me Go by Kazuo Ishiguro The Buddha in the Attic by Julie Otsuka
In Episode 189, author Karen Thompson Walker talks with Sarah about her career to date and her newest novel, The Strange Case of Jane O. Karen discusses her writing journey, including each book's inspiration and research process. She also touches on the challenges of promoting her latest book without giving away too much and her current work in progress. Plus, Karen shares her book recommendations. This post contains affiliate links through which I make a small commission when you make a purchase (at no cost to you!). CLICK HERE for the full episode Show Notes on the blog. Highlights Books by Karen Thompson Walker: The Age of Miracles (2012), The Dreamers (2019), and The Strange Case of Jane O. (2025) Karen talks about going from working as an editor to a being published author The genre Karen feels her books best fit in The real-life inspiration for The Age of Miracles A peek into her research process and which book required the most work Karen's thoughts on writing about an epidemic (in The Dreamers) just before the real-life COVID-19 pandemic A brief spoiler-free overview of The Strange Case of Jane O. and the inspiration behind it Some of Oliver Sacks' interesting case histories that inspired Karen The difficulty in trying to promote and talk about a book like The Strange Case of Jane O. without giving too much away How Karen sees the relationship between her three published books A bit about Karen's current work in progress Karen's Book Recommendations [36:20] Two OLD Books She Loves The Virgin Suicides by Jeffrey Eugenides (1993) | Amazon | Bookshop.org[37:22] The Buddha in the Attic by Julie Otsuka (2011) | Amazon | Bookshop.org [39:26] Other Books Mentioned: The Swimmers by Julie Otsuka (2023) [40:51] Two NEW Books She Loves The Antidote by Karen Russell (March 11, 2025) | Amazon | Bookshop.org[41:20] The Light Eaters by Zoë Schlanger (2024) | Amazon | Bookshop.org [42:39] One Book She DIDN'T Love My Brilliant Friend by Elena Ferrante (2011) | Amazon | Bookshop.org [44:39] One NEW RELEASE She's Excited About Audition by Katie Kitamura (April 8, 2025) | Amazon | Bookshop.org [47:22] Other Books Mentioned: The Safekeep by Yael van der Wouden (2024) [49:20] A Separation by Katie Kitamura (2017) [49:35] Intimacies by Katie Kitamura (2021) [49:39] Last 5-Star Book Karen Read Trust by Hernan Diaz (2022) | Amazon | Bookshop.org [50:14] Books From the Discussion Brain on Fire by Susannah Cahalan (2012) [22:54] Awakenings by Oliver Sacks (1973) [24:16]
Dennis (43) wordt soms bovenmatig boos. Het uit zich in kinderlijke driftbuien of in nukkigheid. Hij merkt dat het vaak komt op momenten dat hij zich niet gezien voelt. Waar komt dat vandaan? En hoe kan hij hier anders naar kijken?
Acclaimed as the Oliver Sacks of fiction and the Michael Crichton of brain science, Lisa Genova is the New York Times bestselling author of More or Less Maddy, Still Alice, Left Neglected, Love Anthony, Inside the O'Briens, and Remember: The Science of Memory and the Art of Forgetting. Still Alice was adapted into an Oscar–winning film starring Julianne Moore, Alec Baldwin, and Kristen Stewart. Lisa graduated valedictorian from Bates College with a degree in biopsychology and holds a PhD in neuroscience from Harvard University. She is featured in the documentary films To Not Fade Away and Have You Heard About Greg. Her TED talks on Alzheimer's disease and memory have been viewed over eleven million times. Her latest novel is More or Less Maddy.
Jala is joined by Desirée to discuss types of trauma, methods of coping and more. They also discuss the book The Body Keeps the Score by Bessel van der Kolk, M.D. This episode is primarily a book report of: The Body Keeps the Score by Bessel van der Kolk, M.D. (https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/313183/the-body-keeps-the-score-by-bessel-van-der-kolk-md/) Links & Articles * Desirée recommends the works of Oliver Sacks (https://www.oliversacks.com/books-by-oliver-sacks/) * Trauma | Psychology Today (https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/basics/trauma) Related episodes: * Episode 3: Diversity, Equity, Inclusion & Belonging (DEIB) (https://www.jalachan.place/3) - discussion of Diversity, Equity, Inclusion & Belonging (DEIB): what it is, why it's important for everyone, how to approach it, what to do when you make a mistake, and more. * Episode 27: Death Positivity (https://www.jalachan.place/27) - discussion of the death positive movement, The Order of the Good Death, and that one time Cameron faceplanted directly into the chest cavity of an embalmed corpse. * Episode 42: Empathy & Emotional Intelligence (https://www.jalachan.place/42) - discussion of empathy, emotional intelligence, and why they are so crucial especially in these constantly-connected times. * Episode 58: Burnout (https://www.jalachan.place/58) - discussion of burnout, current work culture and the economy through the lens of history. Support this show via Ko-fi! Just like Patreon, there are subscription tiers (with bonus content!) in addition to the ability to drop us a one-time donation. Every little bit helps us put out better quality content and keep the lights on, and gets a shout out in a future episode. Check out ko-fi.com/fireheartmedia (https://ko-fi.com/fireheartmedia) for the details! Don't forget to rate & review us on your podcasting platform of choice~ Jala Prendes Bluesky - @jalachan (https://bsky.app/profile/jalachan.bsky.social), Bluesky - @fireheartmedia (https://bsky.app/profile/fireheartmedia.bsky.social) The Level (https://thelevelpodcast.com/hosts/jala) Desirée Neyens Bluesky (https://bsky.app/profile/dneyens.bsky.social) Twitter (https://twitter.com/dneyens) Special Guest: Desirée Neyens.
Welcome to For Your Listening Pleasure. In this episode, I sit down with writer and photographer Bill Hayes, whose memoir Insomniac City profoundly impacted me during a pivotal moment in my life. Bill shares his journey of love, loss, and new beginnings—from losing his longtime partner, Steve, to later falling in love with renowned neurologist Oliver Sacks.We explore the healing power of nighttime walks, music, and photography and the creative process behind adapting Insomniac City into a screenplay. With five books and a stunning photography collection, Bill's reflections on resilience, creativity, and embracing change are as moving as they are inspiring. Episode Resources:Bill HayesLink to purchase:FYLPxTracee Badway Merch CollaborationFYLPxWRDSMTH Merch Collaboration*suggestion is to size upDownload this episode of For Your Listening Pleasure wherever you get your podcasts! Make sure you follow us on Instagram @foryourlisteningpleasure Click here to listen to the For Your Listening Pleasure Theme Song Playlist on Spotify.To continue the conversation, feel free to DM me at https://www.instagram.com/foryourlisteningpleasure/ or email me at foryourlisteningpleasure@gmail.com.
This week we are joined by Lisa Genova! Acclaimed as the Oliver Sacks of fiction and the Michael Crichton of brain science, Lisa Genova is the New York Times bestselling author of Still Alice, Left Neglected, Love Anthony, Inside the O'Briens, and Remember: The Science of Memory and the Art of Forgetting. Her new novel is More Or Less Maddy. Still Alice was adapted into an Oscar–winning film starring Julianne Moore, Alec Baldwin, and Kristen Stewart. Lisa graduated valedictorian from Bates College with a degree in biopsychology and holds a PhD in neuroscience from Harvard University. She is featured in the documentary films To Not Fade Away and Have You Heard About Greg. Her TED talks on Alzheimer's disease and memory have been viewed more than eleven million times.In this discussion, Lisa Genova shares her journey from neuroscience to becoming a successful novelist, discussing her experiences with mental health, the challenges of self-publishing, and the importance of addressing complex topics like bipolar disorder through literature. She emphasizes the role of comedy in understanding mental health and the emotional rollercoaster that comes with both writing and performing. Genova's insights into the intersection of science and storytelling provide a unique perspective on how narratives can humanize and educate about neurological conditions. She also shares the challenges of adapting her work for film, and the significance of addressing serious topics like suicidal ideation in her writing. The discussion also touches on the influence of Taylor Swift in her latest book, 'More or Less Maddy.' Give This Episode a Listen! Recommendations From This Episode: Brain on Fire: My Month of Madness Miss Americana Gary Gulman - The Great DepreshGary Gulman - GrandiloquentFollow Lisa Genova: @authorlisagenovaFollow Carly: @carlyjmontagFollow Emily: @thefunnywalshFollow the podcast: @aloneatlunchpodPlease rate and review the podcast! Spread the word! Tell your friends! Email us: aloneatlunch@gmail.comSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Sant Pau fue un hospital revolucionario. El arquitecto modernista Lluís Domènech i Montaner visualizó un recinto con múltiples pabellones conectados por zonas verdes, para que los pacientes pudieran recuperarse respirando y paseando en un oasis en medio de la ciudad. Estuve ingresado en Sant Pau de pequeño y, aunque mi dolencia no presentaba gravedad, estoy convencido que me recuperé mejor gracias a la belleza y al buen diseño de esos edificios. Hoy, después de la reforma, Sant Pau es un hospital moderno sin alma, en el que los pacientes se sienten mal tan solo entrar. Arturo Goicoechea entiende la medicina desde la óptica biológica: los organismos reaccionan al entorno. Antes como jefe de neurología y ahora desde GoiGroup, Arturo ayuda a sus pacientes a interpretar las señales que manda un cuerpo que es siempre sabio. Kapital es posible gracias a sus colaboradores: lbo.legal. Asesoramiento jurídico para tu empresa Víctor López Jr. fue un invitado especial en el podcast de Kapital. De todo lo que dijo, dos cosas que se me quedaron grabadas. Que no es necesario marcharse de Sevilla para hacer grandes cosas. Y que un abogado debe poder adaptarse a un entorno cambiante. Víctor lleva desde 2012 al frente de lbo.legal, una firma que ofrece servicios de asesoría jurídica, fiscal, laboral y de protección de datos, en un servicio diseñado para resolver todas las necesidades legales que puedas necesitar. Si estás buscando servicios jurídicos para tu empresa, ya sabes a quién llamar. Smartick. El método online de matemáticas y lectura. ¿Quieres el mejor futuro para tus hijos? ¿Crees en la constancia y los buenos hábitos, en el desafío, en que existe un uso responsable de la tecnología? Si tienen entre 4 y 14 años, consigue que dominen los pilares de su educación, en el colegio y como personas: las matemáticas, la comprensión lectora, escribir bien, el pensamiento crítico. Smartick es el método online personalizado, basado en evidencias científicas, con solo 15 minutos al día por programa, que les ayudará a alcanzar su máximo potencial. Sin ayuda de los padres. Además, tendrás siempre disponible a expertos para consultar su evolución. Prueba 7 días gratis Smartick en este enlace y, si contratas, obtén un precio especial añadiendo el cupón KAPITAL. Patrocina Kapital. Toda la información en este link. Índice: 2:30 El dolor desde un punto de vista biológico. 13:04 Historias que construye el organismo. 20:28 Estupidez natural y estupidez artificial. 32:40 Tenemos la obligación de ser libres. 42:16 ¿Qué se siente siendo un murciélago? 49:11 Cotillear por maladaptación evolutiva. 55:12 El txikiteo como ritual diario. 59:44 ¿Existe el libre albedrío? 1:04:10 Futuros clientes de la medicina. 1:14:40 Padres carpinteros y padres jardineros. 1:21:34 Desactivar relatos perniciosos. 1:30:08 La newsletter de GoiGroup. 1:33:22 Mínimo una hora por visita. Apuntes: Tu cuerpo habla. Arturo Goicoechea. Sapiens, ma non troppo. Arturo Goicoechea. El dolor crónico no es para siempre. Arturo Goicoechea. Desaprender la migraña. Arturo Goicoechea & Inés Goicoechea. El origen de las especias. Charles Darwin. En movimiento. Oliver Sacks. Gratitud. Oliver Sacks. El mundo de ayer. Stefan Zweig. Los peligros de la moralidad. Pablo Malo. El miedo a la libertad. Erich Fromm. El azar y la necesidad. Jacques Monod. The painful truth. Monty Lyman. Relatos autobiográficos. Thomas Bernhard.
If you want to hear the story of a truly unstoppable person then listen to this episode and our guest, Tina Huang. To begin, Tina grew up with a hidden disability which still does not really have a name. Tina will tell us how she battled through school up through under graduate and graduate studies knowing she was different, but not getting any real support to find out why she had so many difficulties with the learning process. Even so, not only did Tina have challenges, but she found on her own ways to get by and even excel. In addition to her learning disability she lately has also had to battle what she calls “being environmentally sensitive”. She has had to face mold in three different homes which caused her to face serious illness. As she will tell us, however, she has come out the other side and is again open for business helping others who face similar difficulties as she has faced. Tina has not only learned pre-covid how to be a good healer, but due to all the challenges she has faced she has found improved healing methods that have helped her. She is using her newly learned skills to do even more to help her clients. Tina clearly is committed to living and being unstoppable. She has lots to offer as you will see. About the Guest: For the 1st half of my life, I struggled with learning disabilities, severe stomach pains, depression, anxiety, and horrific self-loathing. My father was always angry, and we were constantly walking on eggshells around him. I never could please him. We lived in Hong Kong for 4 years where my parents put me in a Chinese speaking school, and I hated it. I never was able to learn the language well enough to make friends. Life was better after returning to the US, but in high school I was starting to notice that I had to work a lot harder than my peers. In college I got my degree in computer science and then became a software engineer, but I had no love for computers. Meanwhile my ailments and concerns were either dismissed by doctors, or inadequately addressed, or I was told I had to just accept my limitations. This was fueling my depression and despair, so I decided for my own mental health, that I had to refuse to accept their limitations. I decided that if they didn't have answers, I had to find them. It was my only hope! I applied to get my Ph.D. in neuroscience and went to the University of Rochester. But in graduate school, we had lectures that would last for 4 hours and I couldn't keep up. There weren't any textbooks, and I kept missing key points. I constantly had to ask a classmate to help me fill in the gaps. I was having frequent panic attacks about whether I'd be able to stay in grad school. My peers seemed to be able to have relatively balanced lives, but I constantly had to turn down social activities to study. Several professors suggested that I consider doing something else, but they argued that if I couldn't handle the classes, the research was going to be infinitely harder. I disagreed. I'd always been good at projects. It was the memorization that I struggled with. I was finally diagnosed with a learning disability in my last academic class in grad school. My senior lab advisor dropped my funding when I told him I had been diagnosed with a learning disability. My only chance of staying in grad school was to write my own NIH grant. I did. The head of the Neurobiology & Anatomy program offered to read my grant the night before it was due. He told me it was the best NRSA grant he'd ever read, and that he had no suggestions for improvement! It got funded on my first submission! This was a first in all 3 neuroscience programs in my grad school (University of Rochester)! In my 5th year in grad school, I realized I wasn't great in the lab, and didn't love doing research on animals, so I took off for a badly needed vacation for a month in India. My travel partner mentioned wanting to get his Masters of Public Health, and I couldn't wait to learn more about it. When I got back, I discovered the field of epidemiology and realized that this was a MUCH better fit for me. So after getting my Ph.D. I went to Johns Hopkins for a postdoctoral fellowship in psychiatric epidemiology. I did a postdoc in nutritional epidemiology at Tufts University, some research with Transparent Corporation, and then ended up in a couple of postdocs that went south for various reasons, and I had to leave the field. I was devastated. I knew that if I had the support I needed, I would have been able to make a much bigger difference in Alzheimer's research, but apparently that wasn't my destiny. Out of my despair, I sought ways to heal from my trauma. I had already seen a psychiatrist at the best medical school, and counselors for decades, but I still hated almost everything about me. Things had to change! So I kept searching for anything that would help. And that is when I discovered energy medicine. I noticed that I was for the first time getting relief from my trauma for the first time in my life! When I felt like my research career had ended, I started my business as a holistic brain health practitioner when I realized that I could help clients address their root causes quickly and efficiently with my intuitive skills. Because I didn't have any business skills or support, it took a long time for me to have a full practice, but in 2021 I had a full practice with a waiting list. Then in early 2022 disaster struck. I had to evacuate from 3 homes over 5 months due to mold and toxins. The first 2 killed my beloved soulmate kitty. Then I bought a condo and had to evacuate 2 weeks later due to toxic mold and parasites. The toxic mold came from the attic and chimney, and the stress of having to compel the HOA to remediate, while I was having relentlessly terrifying symptoms and unable to live at home was too much. I was out of money and had to live with strangers while I was extremely sick and immunocompromised in the middle of COVID. I also got extremely environmentally sensitive and couldn't interact with paper, my clothes, bags, my computer or phone safely for about a year. While I was an excellent healer before this trauma, I've been forced to relentlessly search for better and better ways to heal safely. Luckily, it's been paying off, and I'm no longer environmentally sensitive and finally able to work again. I need to rebuild my business as quickly as possible to pay off my debts so I don't lose my home. I'm on a mission to help others with similar issues, so less people will have to endure the hell that I've been through. But I'm unstoppable. Ways to connect with Tina: https://tryholisticbrainhealth.com/ https://www.facebook.com/tryHolisticBrainHealth/ https://www.facebook.com/tina.huang.353 https://www.linkedin.com/in/tinalhuangphd/ www.youtube.com/@TinaHuangPhD About the Host: Michael Hingson is a New York Times best-selling author, international lecturer, and Chief Vision Officer for accessiBe. Michael, blind since birth, survived the 9/11 attacks with the help of his guide dog Roselle. This story is the subject of his best-selling book, Thunder Dog. Michael gives over 100 presentations around the world each year speaking to influential groups such as Exxon Mobile, AT&T, Federal Express, Scripps College, Rutgers University, Children's Hospital, and the American Red Cross just to name a few. He is Ambassador for the National Braille Literacy Campaign for the National Federation of the Blind and also serves as Ambassador for the American Humane Association's 2012 Hero Dog Awards. https://michaelhingson.com https://www.facebook.com/michael.hingson.author.speaker/ https://twitter.com/mhingson https://www.youtube.com/user/mhingson https://www.linkedin.com/in/michaelhingson/ accessiBe Links https://accessibe.com/ https://www.youtube.com/c/accessiBe https://www.linkedin.com/company/accessibe/mycompany/ https://www.facebook.com/accessibe/ Thanks for listening! Thanks so much for listening to our podcast! If you enjoyed this episode and think that others could benefit from listening, please share it using the social media buttons on this page. Do you have some feedback or questions about this episode? Leave a comment in the section below! Subscribe to the podcast If you would like to get automatic updates of new podcast episodes, you can subscribe to the podcast on Apple Podcasts or Stitcher. You can subscribe in your favorite podcast app. You can also support our podcast through our tip jar https://tips.pinecast.com/jar/unstoppable-mindset . Leave us an Apple Podcasts review Ratings and reviews from our listeners are extremely valuable to us and greatly appreciated. They help our podcast rank higher on Apple Podcasts, which exposes our show to more awesome listeners like you. If you have a minute, please leave an honest review on Apple Podcasts. Transcription Notes: Michael Hingson ** 00:00 Access Cast and accessiBe Initiative presents Unstoppable Mindset. The podcast where inclusion, diversity and the unexpected meet. Hi, I'm Michael Hingson, Chief Vision Officer for accessiBe and the author of the number one New York Times bestselling book, Thunder dog, the story of a blind man, his guide dog and the triumph of trust. Thanks for joining me on my podcast as we explore our own blinding fears of inclusion unacceptance and our resistance to change. We will discover the idea that no matter the situation, or the people we encounter, our own fears, and prejudices often are our strongest barriers to moving forward. The unstoppable mindset podcast is sponsored by accessiBe, that's a c c e s s i capital B e. Visit www.accessibe.com to learn how you can make your website accessible for persons with disabilities. And to help make the internet fully inclusive by the year 2025. Glad you dropped by we're happy to meet you and to have you here with us. Michael Hingson ** 01:21 Greetings once again, everyone. I am your host, Mike Hingson, and you are listening to unstoppable mindset today, we get to do one of those things that I always love, and that is, we get a guest who I met at a recent podapalooza event. And if you don't know what podaPalooza is? Because you haven't kept up with this here. PodaPalooza is an event that happens four times a year, and it is an event for people who are doing podcasts, who want to interview people, people who want to become podcasters, and are wanting to learn how and it's also for people who want to be interviewed by podcasters. I think that covers everything. So it really is all things podcasting. And we had one earlier in June. And out of that, I happened to meet this very interesting lady, Tina Huang, who said that she wanted to come on unstoppable mindset. And I thought that would be a good thing. So here we are, Tina, welcome to unstoppable mindset. We're really Tina Huang ** 02:24 glad you're here. Thank you for having me, Michael and Michael Hingson ** 02:28 I didn't tell her that we would be nice, but we will. Tina Huang ** 02:34 I'm always nice. Michael Hingson ** 02:35 Well, there you go. See that's what works. As I did tell Tina, I think I told you, if I didn't, then I'll tell you now that there's one hard and fast rule on this podcast, and that is, everyone has to have fun. So there sounds great. So that works. Tina Huang ** 02:51 I'm always up for fun. There you Michael Hingson ** 02:53 are. It's always a good idea to have fun. Well, let's start maybe by kind of learning a little about the earlier Tina, growing up and all that. Why don't you tell us a little bit about that, and then we can, and I know from reading your bio, we can then go into all sorts of things from there. Tina Huang ** 03:09 Yeah, well, thank you for asking. Michael. I actually had a pretty difficult childhood growing up. It's not a fun topic, but I'll kind of go into some some brief aspects about it. So I was born in the United States, but I moved to Hong Kong when we were when I was about six, seven years old, after first grade, and my parents put me in a Chinese speaking school, and I didn't speak Chinese at that time, and they my dad was like, you know, you got to learn Chinese by immersion. And I have to say that I really, really, really struggled. It was so hard for me. We had to memorize our Chinese lessons, and it would be only a paragraph, but the way I would memorize would be that, I mean, it was just I realized that just the standard, like repeating sentences over and over again wasn't working for me. So I finally went down to the method of memorizing one character and then adding another character and memorizing two characters and then memorizing three characters. I mean, it was so slow and so methodical. And at first grade, I was like, up till like, after midnight, studying for these stupid exams, these Chinese lesson exams. And my sister, my younger sister, was not having these kinds of problems at all, and so nobody picked up on something, that something was wrong, but that was kind of a beginning indicator that was something, that something wasn't going well for me. I hated Hong Kong, to be honest. It was just such a struggle. And I really miss speaking English, you know, I didn't. It was very hard to make friends when I was struggling so much with the language, and I get caught, get get, got put in different classrooms every year, because the way, my parents decided that to to keep us in school, they had a class that would go from morning to afternoon to morning to afternoon, but they want to keep me in the mornings. And so I had different, different classmates every. A year. So it was a real struggle. And I was very happy to get back to the United States, where I was like, oh my goodness, we're speaking English again. And and suddenly I went from being and I, and before I had left for Hong Kong, I was actually, like, grades ahead of everybody else. I was like, in third they, you know, even though I was in first grade, I kept getting put in, like, with the third graders. So this, you know, going from being the super smart kid to the super dumb kid was a real challenge. So when I came back to the United States again, I was a smart kid, but things my school schools got a lot harder as I got into high school, but especially undergraduate and then graduate school, where I was just really struggling in in classes in terms of absorbing information. And Michael Hingson ** 05:47 what year was this roughly Tina Huang ** 05:49 that I went to Hong Kong? Michael Hingson ** 05:51 No say, when you went to undergrad, when you started college. I started Tina Huang ** 05:55 college in 1986 Okay, Michael Hingson ** 05:58 okay. The reason I asked is that we've learned so much about learning disabilities and so on since that time, yes, so it's not too surprising. But anyway, go ahead, yeah, and Tina Huang ** 06:10 back in those days, for listeners who are younger, we knew hardly anything about learning disabilities, and we might have known about dyslexia when I was young. I don't know, we might have known about add but, you know, it was not something that was discussed. It was very rarely known about, right? So, yeah, and in fact, I went to graduate school in neuroscience, you know, I'm gonna skip move forward to that. And even in my neuroscience programs, we were not talking about learning disabilities back then, I was kind of appalled. I was like, we're not talking about learning disabilities and so, and that will apparently, was in the developmental biology section, but it wasn't in, or it wasn't actually in developmental biology. It was more like developmental psychology, yeah, where it was discussed, but it wasn't, it had not been brought into the neuroscience arena at all. Tina Huang ** 07:02 Well, when Michael Hingson ** 07:03 or let me rephrase it differently, what did you finally discover was your actual learning disability? Was it dyslexia? Or what was it? No, it wouldn't be dyslexia, because that wouldn't answer the issues of learning from an auditory standpoint, Chinese, although that's a language with a lot of nuances anyway, Tina Huang ** 07:24 yeah, that well, so the the learning disability that doesn't actually have a name, it was just called an accumulative learning disability. You know, some people have auditory deficits. Some people have visual deficits. I had everything deficit in terms of, well, everything they tested deficit. And I should say that I didn't actually get diagnosed with learning disability until my last year of classes in graduate school, and it was because of the times, really, because there was just so little known about it. But I had extensive testing with a clinical psychologist, and what they discovered was that that I was exceptionally brilliant in some ways and exceptionally handicapped in others. And what I was struggling with, and what I still struggle with, it's just accumulation of information, a lot of information. And in graduate school in neuroscience, we actually had classes that lasted for four hours. And imagine four hours of intense, yes, not conducive to learning at all. Michael Hingson ** 08:23 Disability notwithstanding, oh, Tina Huang ** 08:25 my goodness, yeah. And, and, you know, it's a little frustrating to me. You know, in a neuroscience program that they'd actually allow that, like, how do they not understand that, that a four hour lecture is not a good idea for anybody. But you know, of course, especially with people learning disabilities. But you know, they weren't here there to accommodate people learning disabilities, even though two of us had one, one of my friends, we only we. You know, graduate school programs aren't necessarily large. Mine was only seven. No right between seven and 13 people in each class, depending on the the the class. And so I think in our program officially, there were nine or 11 or something like that, because it varied a bit depending on the year. But one, one of the women had dyslexia, and then there was me, and I really the it's a cumulative learning disability. So basically it means that, you know, if there's a lot of if there's too much information being presented at once, I'm not going to be able to retain it all. And it really shows up a lot in languages. Like, because there's just languages are almost they come out from nowhere. I have a really hard time remembering names unless they're common. Like, I don't have a problem with Michael, but if you give me a Chinese name that I've never maybe a language like Arabic or something like that, that I don't know Well, I mean, that's going to be or I don't know at all, that could be a real challenge unless I've heard that name before, or if it's simple to pronounce. But the more complex a name is, and the more foreign it is, the harder it is for me to remember, right? So it's, it's an. It's a learning disability that sort of requires that really baseline learning and and you know, that idea that, like people, can just jump into a foreign country and absorb that is exactly what I can't do, right? There's no immersion aspect of of what I do just FYI, I'm not making these funny. All these strange symbols are coming up on zoom that I'm not making. So I'm going to see if I can stop that. But I'm not making those purposely. Michael Hingson ** 10:31 That's okay. And I'm not hearing and I'm not hearing them, so it's okay, okay. But the it's, it's interesting. So you went through most of of school, not really understanding why you were and you obviously observed that you were different, but you had no real understanding of why you were different or how you were different other than you just couldn't get material absorbed the same way most people did Tina Huang ** 11:00 Right, right. And yet it was very confusing, because I was often told, Oh, you're really smart. You're so smart, you know. And I know that, like in some ways I am, you know. And actually, right now, they're only talking about it, but there's this term called twice exceptional. And twice exceptional is when you are exceptionally brilliant and yet exceptionally handicapped at the same time, and that's, you know, when you and somebody asked me really recently, you know, so isn't everybody neurodivergent, right? Doesn't everybody have these differences in their learning? And my answer to them was, yes, we all have different brains, and some of us are stronger in some ways and weaker and other ways. But when you have a disability that's so severe that you cannot have a normal life, you can't you can't have any balance in your life, or you need accommodations, and you can't function. You can't survive with the way society is expecting you to survive based on your disabilities. That's when you have a quote, unquote disability, is when societies, the society is not geared to help you thrive. Michael Hingson ** 12:07 Course, the the issue with disabilities in general, and it's something that we talk about from time to time, on unstoppable mindset, when the opportunity arises, I submit that everyone on the planet has a disability, and the problem for most people is they're light dependent. Why is that a disability? Just watch the power suddenly go out where you are, especially at night, but even during the day, I've seen that happen during the day, power goes out, lights go out suddenly. Everybody's scrambling to try to find a smartphone or a flashlight to be able to see, because they're not used to functioning without light, and the reality is that their disability of light dependence is covered up because we have focused so heavily on making light on demand available. But it doesn't change the fact that the disability is still there, it's just covered up a lot, right? Tina Huang ** 13:04 But you don't need it to survive either, unless, unless we have a power outage, right? So you, you know, you are much more prepared if we all have a power outage than most of us. But, yeah, situation often, then, then you would be in better shape. But if we don't have power outages, if we live in a country where that's not a common problem, then you know, other people are an advantage because they can see, right? Michael Hingson ** 13:33 Oh, no, I understand that, but. But the point is, though, that if you want to level the playing field, the reality is, everyone has a disability of some sort. It's just that for most people, the disability is really covered up because we have light on demand. We don't have light on demand necessarily in Uganda and other places like that, where there isn't power or a lot of power. I actually talked with someone yesterday who's going to come on unstoppable mindset, and they offer to children solar powered lamps so that they can study because they don't have power to be able to have lights to study at night, but if they have solar powered lamps that charge up during the day, then in fact, they can continue to study at night, unless They take a different tact and learn braille or something like that, but sighted people aren't going to do that, and that's okay, but the bottom line is, it still proves that everyone has some sort of disability. What we don't tend to do nearly as much as we ought to is recognize that while everyone has different gifts. We shouldn't knock somebody just because their gifts are different than our gifts, right? Tina Huang ** 14:47 And actually, I want to expand on that quite a bit, because there is, if we think about this a little bit more broadly. Well, first of all, there's, I don't know if you're familiar with Oliver Sacks, books he wrote. A Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat. He's a famous neurologist, and he talks about people who are differentially abled. He himself, I think, would be considered twice exceptional. He is the kind of person that he has a facial AG, nausea, where he cannot recognize people when he sees them. And in fact, it's so bad. It is so bad that if he looks in the mirror, he doesn't even recognize himself. And that's just insane. That's that is extreme. So he, he is also absolutely a brilliant writer and a brilliant neurologist, and he writes a lot about people who are differentially abled. So he has, you know, he's written about amazing stories of like, for example, there's a drummer with Tourette's syndrome, and as soon as he takes his medication, so he's a absolutely brilliant drummer. And as soon as he takes his medication, he loses that, that profound ability to drum in the way that he normally does. It's just, it's fascinating about what you know, how things can be influenced by our disabilities or the drugs that we take and so forth. There are other stories like, I don't remember whether it was Oliver Sacks or somebody else who wrote about a man who could smell as well as a dog, right? And imagine having the sensory receptors of of pets, right? And if we think about disabilities, it's like, well, you know, if you compare, if we compare ourselves to our dogs and their olfactory senses, well, we, you know, in some ways, we could say we all have disabilities, right? Because there are dogs that can sniff out COVID Or, you know, help us figure out where mold is and so forth. And you know, most humans, the vast majority of humans, aren't built for that. You know, we have there are animals across the animal kingdom that can see a lot of things that we can't see or detect energies that we can't see. And so when we think about this, I mean, and within the human spectrum, there are people that are very right brained and have intuitive abilities that most of us don't have, right so you know that, and so we are all differentially abled. That is true, and sometimes our handicaps actually lead to our brilliances. There's a fascinating story, I think it was on a hidden brain where somebody had a head injury, and after the head injury, they developed these amazing, incredible musical skills that were just beyond imagination. You know, like, suddenly, this person, without training, became a professional musician. It's like, so the brain is absolutely fascinating, and it's one reason why I'm a neuroscienter. I have training in neuroscience is because these differential abilities that people have are mind blowing and mind you know, and it's just fascinating to realize that we are we're all limited in our ability to perceive truth. We are all limited. And I think if we recognize that and know that, like it's dependent on our experiences and our own sensory systems, which are they're limited because we're human and we're not necessarily, we don't have all the sensory system systems that exist. It's just good to know. It's very humbling, and it's also helps us realize that there's all this new stuff to learn in these perspectives, to to learn from. Tina Huang ** 18:24 And Michael Hingson ** 18:26 I have always been a proponent of the concept that in reality, we should always be learning. And if we ever decide we know all we need to know and stop learning, that's such a horrible thing to do, because there's always new stuff to learn, always, always, which is what makes life so fun. I was at the University of California at Irvine a week ago tomorrow, actually, so last Thursday, and so I was down there because I was inducted actually into phi beta, kappa as an alumni member, which is kind of cool, because I wasn't able to to join when I was in in college, because they were just forming the chapter when I was leaving. But I was visiting one of my thank you. I was visiting with one of my old physics professors, actually a couple of them. And I brought up, you know, we were talking about how, how physics has learned so much, but there's still so much to learn. And I said, Well, someday we'll finally figure out the unified field theory that combines everything. And one of the professors said something that's very interesting, and I think is very true. He said it may not even be unified field theory. It may go off in completely different directions, which is new from the way it used to be. But the fact is, we're learning so much that we are. We're learning and discovering that things we thought aren't necessarily the way they are, and we have to continue to grow. And I think it's so much fun to see that sort of thing happening. Yeah, Tina Huang ** 19:57 and I have to say, I mean, that's part of being an unstoppable. Having an unstoppable mindset, right? One thing that I talk about as a holistic brain health practitioner is that, you know, the reason why I'm a Holistic brain health practitioner, I should say, is because of my differential brain, my brain that doesn't, doesn't, isn't very, very conducive to an environment like medical school. So I basically did the PhD route and did postdoctoral training in epidemiology in order to to develop my expertise in root causes, which is what I'm an expert in. But as I talk to clients or the public in general, a lot of people struggle with symptoms that they don't understand or characteristics they don't understand. And Western medicine, you know, as brilliant as it is, and I'm not going to, you know, I'm not bad talking western medicine, but I think in the United States, we put a little bit too much faith in western medicine, and believe that it should be able to address everything. And right now it doesn't, and it may not ever get that way, until they start to open their mind up to look at what other cultures are doing. Chinese medicine, for example, has so much brilliance. Energy. Medicine has so much brilliance. The Amazon has so much brilliance. And if we stick to the idea that we need to think about it only in terms of the way that Western medicine is able to do it, and they are thinking about it in from a, you know, if you look at physics, they're looking at it from a It's not quantum mechanics, it's the other kind of mechanics. What is it? Classical Mechanics, right? It's a classical way of looking at things, but quantum mechanics is really like, that's where the magic happens, right? And if they're not incorporating that way of thinking, then they're going to think that everybody who's doing using methods, using quantum mechanics is crazy. But physics can prove that quantum that particles can be in two places at once. So in physics, can prove all these things that sound absolutely crazy, but work in energy medicine, and so the idea that like that, you know, I think I want to see, like Western medicine, just the whole field, be a little bit more humble in some ways. You know, when you go to a doctor, if somebody shows up with symptoms that that they don't understand, instead of calling them crazy, I want them to say, Oh, that's interesting. Let me, let me learn more about what's going on for you and see if I can figure out what those causes are or what to do about it. Yeah, you know, Michael Hingson ** 22:38 yeah. So it's so true, I mean, there's more to life than drugs, and yeah, and Western medicine focuses so much just on the drug part of it, and there's been so much evidence that any number of people, and we've had a number of people on unstoppable mindset, who had medical Problems that Western medicine didn't solve but reg a and energy medicines and Eastern medicines and other kinds of forms of medicine, if you will, helped, and they were able to get beyond what was deal, what they were, what they were feeling and what was hurting them, and they became better for it. Tina Huang ** 23:19 Yeah, exactly. And I think that the you know, it's not that you shouldn't look at Western medicine, it's that everything needs to be considered. And I think the more you merge it, and the more you consider the varieties of practices that involve, are involved, or that are possible, the better outcomes you can't get. Same time, it is very overwhelming. There's a lot of possibilities, of places you can go. So it's a matter of knowing, you know where the brilliance is, and and so forth. So that is a challenging and that's my life mission. Is figuring out, you know, what are those methods that are really effective and and helping people heal? Michael Hingson ** 23:56 One of the things when we started dealing with China back in the Nixon administration and beyond, acupuncture started being talked about. But even today, Western medicine doesn't embrace it fully and make it a traditional part of what it does, even though clearly it helps any number of people. Tina Huang ** 24:19 Yeah. And the thing about acupuncture is that, you know, they they used to say, and they're not saying it anymore, but they used to say, Oh, it's a placebo effect. And I would look at it and look at them like, this whole placebo argument is really kind of ridiculous when it comes to acupuncture, because it looks like torture. So it's like, Why would anything look like torture have a placebo effect? You know? Yeah, make any sense to me? Yeah. So, you know, I think, I think at least nowadays, Western medicine is a little bit more cautious about saying anything bad about acupuncture. And, in fact, more are willing to say, hey, you know, it's worth trying. It's worth trying. Exactly, good, yeah. Michael Hingson ** 24:55 Well, so for you, so you went through most of college. Knowledge and everything with a learning disability. What really finally caused you to I don't want, well, maybe the terminology isn't correct to say, feel comfortable with it, but what was it that finally got you to realize that you had a learning disability or were different, and you had to really do things in a different way, and how did that then start to affect what you did? Tina Huang ** 25:26 Yeah, I am, I actually was asked several times in graduate school, like professors took me aside. So I should say, in graduate school, I was having regular panic attacks. I was I had no life. I was studying like crazy. I remember, like sometimes feeling so much panic. I would just get on my bike and just bike as fast as I can, you know, just trying to get that panic out of me. I was pulled aside several times by professors who said to me, you know, I you, you know, you really seem to be struggling way too much. And you know, the classwork is the easy part. If you can't do the class work. How are you ever going to be able to, you know, do the research? And I would, I would look at them and say, look, the classwork is going to be the hardest part for me. This is definitely going to be the hardest part for me. But once I get to the projects, once I get to the research, I'm good with projects. I think I should be okay. And they would look at me like I had two heads, and then let me know. And finally, my my advisor, My Media Advisor, in the lab I was working with, said, you know, Tina, you asked too many questions. And I was like, well, so does this other person like? Why? How? Why is asking questions a bad idea? And he said, Well, yours are different. And so I knew that he really cared about me, and he wanted me to thrive. And so the way he phrased it made me start to think, Okay, I need to go see get a clinical, you know, clinical evaluation. Now, again, back then, this was not something like we only knew about, I think dyslexia, and add at a time, weren't names for other learning disabilities and and so, and very few people even like, he didn't suggest I go see one like. He didn't even really know much about that concept. He just said, something is different about you. And so I did some research and looked and found out that there was a Learning Disability Center. And so I went to them, talked to them, and I had looked into the, I think, briefly before, but nothing. The disabilities that were described weren't exactly what I had. So, you know, it was, I didn't know if they could help me, but they sent me off to clinical psychologist who gave me this evaluation I was talking about, that that, you know, actually found that I was like he was actually the clinical psychologist I saw was in his 70s, and he had been working in the field for, I don't know, 50 years or something like that, but some insanely long period of time. And he said, you know, your ability to accumulate information is like less than the 20th percentile. We're talking about general population. We're not talking about in comparison to graduate school peers. And then when it but when it comes to, like, this one math test, which is just sort of arithmetic, he's like you, not only did you score a perfect score, but you did it faster than anybody else I've seen in the history of my entire career. And also I knew that, like, you know, we took these graduate school record examinations. And we had a verbal section, we had a math section, we had a logic section, and I know that, like in the logic section, I actually scored in the 98th percentile for people who are taking this examination. In the math I was like, in the upper nine, like, not upper 90s, but I think like 90 or 92nd or something like that percentile and the verbal, I studied the verbal like crazy, and I was, like, in less the 40th percentile. But I studied, I could never get that up high, you know, at all. So that's, you know, again, another example of extreme. So anyways, differences in my my abilities. So in that last class in graduate school I did, I was able to ask for more time on my tests, but my senior advisor also told me that I had to tell I'm sorry. My junior advisor also told me I had to tell my senior advisor that I had a disability, and I really dreaded that, but he had, he was holding the key to my funding. I was on his grant, and so I told him, and he dropped me. He dropped my funding. 29:21 And did he say why? He Tina Huang ** 29:25 did not say why. Because, if he had said why, it would have been illegal. But, you know, he basically said he didn't think I could do the job right. Do, do the research. Luckily, my junior advisor believed in me, and my junior advisor was starting to get really worried about my senior advisor and not say he did not say that explicitly, but I could see in his actions there, the senior advisor was really well known, but there were some things about him that were of grave concern that were really getting revealed, partly from interactions with me. And so he dropped. To me, but Carrie o Banyan, who is my, was my advisor at the time, said, You know, you're, he didn't have the money at that time, and he's like, the only option we have is if you we write a grant, you know, and I had to write that. That was, that was an NIH grant called NRSA. And I wrote that grant, and with his support. And I remember the night before submission, the head of the neurobiology, anatomy Department said, Hey, Tina, would you like me to read your grant and give you just any last minute advice? And I was like, Sure. And so he calls me up the night before it's due. And he's like, okay, Tina, I want you to write. Sit down, grab a piece of paper and a pen, and I want you to write this down. And he's like, are you ready, you know, are you prepared for this? And I'm like, Yeah, give it to me, you know. And he goes, I want you to write I did an excellent job on my NRSA. And I was like, oh, okay, well, thank you. Do you have anything else? And he's like, No, I'm like, what? He goes, this is the best NRSA I've ever read. Tina Huang ** 31:05 I was like, oh, okay, thank you. He goes, Michael Hingson ** 31:08 What does NRSA stand for? And Tina Huang ** 31:10 NRSA is, oh, it's just, I can't remember. It's important, Michael Hingson ** 31:15 no, just curious. Anyway, go Tina Huang ** 31:17 ahead, yeah, but it is the it was at least that time. It was the premier NIH grant that you could get as a graduate student. It was the most prestigious and best NRSA ever read, yeah, yeah. And so it was the best NRSA you'd ever read. And he said, yeah, just submit it as is. It's as good as it gets. You don't need any improvement. And then so I submitted it, and I got funded on the first submission. And again, that was the first. That's very unusual too. Yeah, it was extremely unusual. It was the first in all three neuroscience departments at University of Rochester. Tina Huang ** 31:54 So I'm Tina Huang ** 31:56 the comeback kid. I mean, I got, you know, I love that. You know, here I am. People have asked me to leave graduate school three times, and I show them that I can do research, right, you know, and that I'm an excellent grant writer, which is exactly the biggest reason, the biggest fear, and what I had been told is that it's so hard to get grants, and here I am. I just nailed it on my first try. Michael Hingson ** 32:25 What did your senior academic advisor say about that? Oh, Tina Huang ** 32:29 he didn't. He was out of the picture. We just didn't. We stopped talking to him honestly. Okay, Michael Hingson ** 32:32 okay, Tina Huang ** 32:34 yeah. Better that way, yeah. I mean, Tina Huang ** 32:41 I am sure he heard about it, and I'm sure he was stumped. I know, I know that a lot of my professors that had asked me to leave were very confused by that, but I hope, I hope that seeing that enabled them to see that we need to start talking about learning distriments, differences in disabilities, and I, and I have seen that shift like I know that. I know that neuro learning disabilities, actually, what's really interesting is that I'm as I get these graduate school alumni magazines there are, there are actually conferences now in learning disabilities at University of Rochester, in the neuroscience you know that are heavily that neuro or the neuroscience department, is heavily involved. And I would like to think that what they saw with me helped them start to think about the importance of thinking about differential learning abilities. Tina Huang ** 33:36 And probably that is true. Tina Huang ** 33:41 I would, yeah, I just thought of that, but I think, I think that that probably got some heads turning. Michael Hingson ** 33:46 So you got your PhD, and then what did you do? Tina Huang ** 33:52 Well, I realized actually that I was not in love with lab work. I really am interested in mechanism of action, but I did not like the idea of working with animals in the way that we did in the labs, and I didn't like chemicals. And so I went on a trip to India during grad school years to kind of get away and and reframe and just think of it. And I was traveling with a friend who told me he wanted to get his master's in public health. And back then, I didn't know what that was, but I suddenly my ears perked up because that sounded really intriguing to me. And then I got back and and I was in the in a graduate student council, and somebody passed around the the pamphlet for public health, and I looked at it. And I saw this, this little description of a course in epidemiology, and I was like, Wow, this sounds really interesting. And it was about getting at root causes. And so I started digging into looking more the web was just a pretty new thing back then. And so I was like, searching, you know, the web, and trying to figure out. Um, more about this epidemiology, because it sound fascinating. And then I heard the John Snow story, which is about understanding like this. John Snow epidemiologist was what they call a shoestring epidemiologist, where there was a water pump that was the source of cholera, and how he found that made that discovery of how cholera started. And I was just like, This is what I want to do. I want to get at root causes. And so I actually decided, you know, I was advised to finish my PhD. I was in my fifth year at that time. I come pretty far at that point. So I was advised to just finish off my research and then apply for postdocs in epidemiology. So I actually applied. I, for some reason, I went to Johns Hopkins. I applied to Johns Hopkins, and I got accepted there as a postdoc. And so I did my postdoc at psychiatric in psychiatric Epidemiology at Johns Hopkins, and I loved it, because they actually and they let me take all the classes. I audited them, because otherwise I'd have to pay for them. I didn't have the money, so I audited classes in epidemiology and and bio stats and all the other things that I needed to Tina Huang ** 36:16 to work in that field. Michael Hingson ** 36:19 So you learned what you needed to, and that's kind of where you started focusing. Tina Huang ** 36:24 Yeah, yeah. So I wrote, I wrote some the work that I'm most proud of was in that field. I did some pretty made some pretty cool discoveries for in the field of Alzheimer's disease, discovered that early life actually impacts your risk of dementia. And I looked at a measure, an anthropometric measure, called knee knee height. So the height of our knees is actually indicative of our first two years of life. And specifically we were thinking it was nutrition, but now I think it might be more than nutrition. I think nutrition is a very important part of it, but I think also our adverse childhood experiences are contribute, contribute as well, but also our microbiome. So I was the first, not the first, paper to show that knee height was an indicator, indicative of or in knee height, or that those first two years of life was important and relevant for a risk, our future risk of dementia. I was the first person to show that in or first paper to show that in a western population. Michael Hingson ** 37:43 So how did you discover that? Or what exactly did you discover that makes somebody who's less likely to get dementia, as opposed to somebody who's more likely? Tina Huang ** 37:58 Yeah, so what I discovered is that people with shorter knee heights have a higher risk of dementia. Got it and the knee height is indicative. It's a reflection of what happened in the first two years of our life. Okay, Tina Huang ** 38:14 yeah, so Michael Hingson ** 38:15 partly nutrition, but partly other other things that come along that affect it, Tina Huang ** 38:23 right? And I And, and that's, you know, I didn't prove that in the paper. That's just knowledge that I've accumulated from watching the research. But we now know the importance of the microbiome, for example, that was not, we were not touching on that subject at all back then, right? And now there's a lot of research on adverse childhood experiences. You know how our early life experience, you know whether we got enough emotional support, whether we have a parent that's in jail or violent, all of that impacts our stress and our you know, for if we're undergoing if we are in the midst of extreme stress or neglect or anything like that, not getting the new the love and support we need that can impact our ability to impacts our microbiome and our ability to absorb nutrients, digest and absorb nutrients, and To get interest that brain health connection that's vital to success and thriving. Michael Hingson ** 39:24 I know that when, and I've told the story before here, but when I was born, and it was discovered about four months after I was born, that I was blind, I was born two months premature and put in an incubator and given too much oxygen, and that causes the retina not to develop properly, but the doctors told my parents to go off and send me to a home because a blind child could never grow up to be anything good in society. Essentially, couldn't be a contributor, would bring down the family and so on. And my parents said, Absolutely not. He can grow up to learn to do what. Whatever he wants. And that's why opportunity, which is, which is the point. Tina Huang ** 40:06 And I think you're unstoppable, you know, because you had that parental, you know, those parental cheerleaders that you so badly needed, and that's just, that's amazing, well, and the power that's, I mean, that that alone, really speaks to the about the power of parents and what they can do for their kids. I see great example of that. Michael Hingson ** 40:27 I've seen so many kids who are blind or were blind, who grew up and who weren't overly self confident, who didn't do as well as they could have, but it was because they were sheltered. Their parents didn't feel that they could do as much, and the result was they didn't do as much, yeah, and they didn't really learn to do the things that they could do, and they weren't challenged to be able to do the things that they ought to be able to do, like other people, and it's so unfortunate, but I've seen some, some children who grew up who were very good, very competent, very competent, but so many, oh, they're blind, they can't do anything, and that was how they were braced. And that's always a challenge, of course, and a problem, Tina Huang ** 41:17 yeah. And I agree, and the same thing with me. I mean, as a person with learning disabilities, I was often dismissed. I mean, I had, I worked in, you know, I was at Johns Hopkins for my first postdoc, but I had some other postdocs that I'm not going to name, where I was neglected pretty severely, and it's because they did not recognize my genius, or maybe they did and didn't want to to foster that because of my other challenges and didn't, didn't believe that I was worth their time. You know, it's, it's very frustrating to to be brilliant and to know that you can contribute in huge ways, but that you're not given that chance to do so. You know, because of people's perceptions, they're inaccurate perceptions about what you're able or, you know, capable of. It Michael Hingson ** 42:06 gets back to prejudice. It gets back so much to societal prejudice. Yeah, Tina Huang ** 42:10 and it's, it's, it may not be intentional, and I don't think it's intentional prejudice, but it is stereotypes. And it's, we have these stereotypes. You know, our brains are constructed in a way that we have to categorize people quickly and efficiently. And I have to say that I am grateful because our society is changing. I mean, I am seeing that there is more and more awareness about learning disabilities and neuro divergence and celebrating that. Sure so that is that's wonderful. I I actually have been watching a bit of America got America's Got Talent. And what's great, what I really appreciate about that program is they're starting to accept more and more people of more and more different flavors. I mean, at times, there were we didn't, you know, we shunned people who are who are trans or, you know, have different sexual preferences, or gay or whatever. And, and we're becoming more and more open to those people as well, you know. And maybe not everybody is, but African Americans were, you know, we had an African American president. We're seeing we, we got to see an example of of African Americans and what they can do, you know, and Trevor Noah's brilliance. And, you know, there's just so many, you know, I think it was Amanda Gorman who was the amazing poet, yes. And so, it's, it's, it's wonderful that stereotypes are being broken and, and it's about time, you know, I think it is, it's huge change in just the last few years, and with that, and I'm so grateful to finally see that happen, because I've gone through so much of life where that hasn't happened, but I don't, I wish they'd talk more about, you know, other disabilities as well, but, but it changes are happening. So you're you're a part of that. So thank you. Michael Hingson ** 44:03 The reality is that, in general, when we talk about diversity, we never talk about disabilities. It's not part of the conversation, and it should be, especially when the CDC says that up to 25% of all people in this country have some sort of a well, I'll call it traditional disability, as opposed to the other 75% who have light dependence, and it's still a disability, but 25% have a disability, and it's something that we don't talk about. There's a lot of fear involved in that, that, Oh, I could become like them. I don't want that. They're they're not as good as I am, they're less than I am, you know, and you talked about LGBTQ and so on. And I find it so interesting, how many people say in the Bible, it says that that's not a good thing, and you're you're going against the Bible if you're LGBTQ. But you know, Jesus also was the person who said, Judge not, lest you be judged and let. It, he or she, if you will, who is without sin cast the first stone. You know, the reality is that it's not my place to judge anyone, no matter who or what, even politicians, although they deserve it. But you know, we don't we. We don't judge people, because that's not our job. That's between them and God and it Well, Tina Huang ** 45:24 here's the thing is that is that, why would God make us so different and allow that to happen like we're choice, all part of, I mean, this universe produced us, you know, and, and sometimes, you know, if we have brains that don't feel like, you know, if I, if I were, you know, and I'm not this kind of person. But I was also very interested. I actually wrote a paper on the biological basis of homosexuality in graduate school because I thought it was absolutely fascinating of understanding, you know, why? Why do we have brains? Why? Why do we sometimes have brains that don't resonate with how, how we show up externally? You know, like, how come a female can feel like they, they, they should be a male, and a male can feel like, how they should, you know, they should be a female. And it's, it's absolutely fascinating. It's, it's, I'm, I'm very curious about it, but I don't see the defect. It's just a difference, and it's absolutely fascinating, but it's a part of who we are, and it's a part of spectrum of society and and, you know, just because people are different doesn't make them less than it just makes them different, you know, interesting. And even Michael Hingson ** 46:39 if it were true, even if it were true, which I don't think that it is, but even if it were true that, say being homosexual is is a horrible thing, it's still if, for especially religious people, if you think that goes against what God wants, that's still not your choice To make. Yeah, I agree, and people need to get over it. The reality is, it, is it? Mary, very well, may be choice. I don't know that. It's always choice. You're right. Brains are different, but it's still between the individual involved in God, and people need to leave that stuff alone and allow people to grow as they can, and it's okay to be different, but we, we don't generally tend to accept that collectively in our society, it's not okay to be different. You're supposed to really be like me, or you're less than me, right? And Tina Huang ** 47:39 I have to say, in terms of a choice, it's not like, Oh, I'm going to choose this flavor of ice cream. It's more like, you know, I mean, people who are trans are choosing, they're choosing who they really believe that they are. And it's a correct fundamental, like, it's, so it's, it's, it's, it's much more. It may be a choice, but it's kind of a choice to just reveal that their truth, that's the real issue. They think, who they feel, their reality of who they are. So it's it. It's kind of like asking them if to, if they're asked to deny that they're asking to deny who they feel they are. And that's, that's a that's a huge thing to ask of people. Huge thing that's not okay to ask people, you know, and I think that's, that's a huge has been a huge struggle of mine, you know, like, I actually grew up in an environment where very Christian, and I have to say that I'm I rebelled a lot because I kept getting told that I had to believe this and I had to believe that. And it wasn't, it wasn't jiving with me, you know, like the idea that God loves you, wasn't jiving with me because I had so much horrible experiences as a child, you know, I did not feel loved by God, and so I did not resonate with that, right? Um, well, that's not something I'm resonating with right now. You know, it's, it's, it's, it's, yeah, I've had a lot of challenges in my Michael Hingson ** 49:08 life. I, I am one of these people who do believe that God loves everyone, but that is, again, an issue between you and God, and so if you decide that that that's okay, that's okay. If it's if you decide it's not okay, God's not going to smite you down for it. God isn't going to execute you. Everyone. That's the beautiful part about the universe. Everyone has free will, Tina Huang ** 49:40 right, right. I do think it has a lot to do with our experiences, though. So well Michael Hingson ** 49:45 it does it, it does. And you know, something may come along to make you feel differently in the future, but that's it doesn't matter. That's still really the choice that you get to make as you are going through life and experiencing the adventure. Life, and life is an adventure by any standard, right, right? And it far be. It from me to tell you that you have to say that God loves you, Tina Huang ** 50:10 right? I appreciate that. Now, Michael Hingson ** 50:13 my dog, on the other hand, would sit in your lap if he could, but that's another story. He's, he's, he's a Tina Huang ** 50:21 I trust, I trust animals love me. I can have faith in that at least, at least the healthy ones. Well, yeah, but I am a, I'm a bit of an A kitty magnet, although I love them a lot too. So Michael Hingson ** 50:34 Well, we have a cat, or I have a cat, and she's probably waiting for this to end, so that I will go pet her while she eats. She loves to get petted while she eats, and she gets very irritated if she doesn't get attention when she wants it. Yeah, that's okay. That's part of love. How did you grow to be a holistic brain practitioner? Tina Huang ** 51:03 I so I think, you know, I've told you my backstory, learning disabilities and not doing traditional things. I I had severe depression, anxiety, stomach problems, and, of course, these learning disabilities that we've been talking about throughout my early life and kept going to doctors and getting dismissed by doctors. Or, yeah, getting getting dismissed. Or, you know, told I need to go see a psychologist or whatever, and and not really getting to the root of the problems. And I was fascinated by neuroscience, so, you know, I went, you know, did the neuroscience epidemiology route. I told you about that, but I had some bad postdocs, and these postdocs were career ruining for me. I discovered some fraud, and that ended up hurting me more than the person that committed the fraud, which was very upsetting, and I lost my job because I discovered their fraud. And so I had to find new methods to heal. And I had, when I discovered that there were ways that I could, through energy, medicine, intuitively detect root causes directly in people, I decided that that I really need to learn more about this. And when I discovered that the methods worked, I was like, Okay, I need to develop a career in this. You know, it's it was so much more efficient than doing the research. And I also was struggling. I know that, you know, I really was coming down to the or understanding the limitations of research, and some of the big limitations of research, especially when you're looking at data large scale data sets, is that you need to account for all the variables that are involved. And my research was an Alzheimer's disease. And if you look at all the different things are involved that cause Alzheimer's disease, you cannot fit it into a specific equation. You can only fit like, three or four, maybe five variables into a specific into an equation depending on the on your population size, and so it's not going to be able to count for all the very the individual differences. And there was just no way to do that in in epidemiology. And so there's real, I mean, that's just that points to a huge, huge limitation of research is that is really good for people who are the norm. But the problem is, is so many of us are not the norm. So many women. I mean, there's, there's not a lot of research in women, for example. So so much of the research is better for men, you know. And and if you have unusual symptoms, research is not going to cover you at this point, right? So, and I was, I was always in that category of having symptoms that doctors didn't understand. And so I was like, I've got to figure out root causes much more directly. And so when I figured out I could do that, I started to work on develop my own business, and that's how I became a holistic brain health practitioner. I absolutely Michael Hingson ** 54:06 love it. You made comments about the concept of first impressions. Tell me about that. Tina Huang ** 54:14 Yeah, I I don't like I think it's really important dangerous. It could be very dangerous to allow your first impressions to navigate your understanding or shape, not, not it will shape, it will always shape your understanding of a person. But if you let it be the sole contributor to your impressions of a person, it can be very dangerous, so let me just elaborate that on a bit. There are people who are very charming and likable when you first meet them, and oftentimes leaders. Lot of leaders are very likable and very charming and can be very popular and well loved. Tina Huang ** 54:57 But I. Tina Huang ** 55:01 They can also be very toxic to people who are close to them. And I'm specifically talking about people who are in the sociopathic, the sociopathic personality type, and narcissists are a great example of that. They can be very, very charming, and we can hold on, especially if we are an empath, and are the kind of person that wants to take care of others, we can hold on to those beliefs about this person, that they are wonderful, and that everybody loves them, and so forth, you know. Why? Why are they so? Why does everybody love them so much, you know? And then, and then this person, if you get to it into a relationship with them, if you get too close to them, they can end up being very toxic to especially empaths or people who are vulnerable. I'm not saying that everybody who is charming and likable is this way. I'm just saying that if you are, if you happen to encounter a narcissist, that that's what can happen these personality types, they can go from being just absolutely amazing and wonderful in certain stages and absolutely terrifyingly horrifically dangerous for you on the other side. And so making these assumptions is can be very dangerous, but it's also dangerous for the individuals who have disabilities that are hidden. So it is dangerous for people like me who have a hidden disability. People are not necessarily going to see that I have a disability. It is dangerous for people like me because, for example, I developed a severe environmental sensitivity due to Toxic Mold and doctors could never see even first depression can be like going to a doctor's office and they don't see anything wrong and they can't run anything in tests, so they've decided that you're fine. And so for me, I got, didn't get the diagnosis I needed, and I didn't get the support I need. So I'm actually in deep debt because of I wasn't able to work for two years because nobody was able to give me a diagnosis, and I couldn't get on disability. And so that's another example of first impressions that are dangerous. And they may not be dangerous for the person, if it's the doctor giving it to the patient, but it's very dangerous for those of us who struggle with toxic mold issues. Because I am not alone. There are tons of us who struggle with symptoms that nobody understands and are not getting disabilities or disability help because doctors refuse to understand or to look at the impacts of mold on our systems. Mo, you know, there's three types of mold. There is pathogenic mold, sorry, there's allogenic molds, pathogenic mold and toxigenic mold. And most doctors, if you ask them if they know about those three types, or if they know about different types of mold, they will not know. They only know about allergenic and that's a huge problem, because pathogenic mold, for one, can make you sick for months and make it impossible for you to work for months. Toxigenic mold can completely destroy your immune system and your detoxification systems and make you completely immunocompromised. And it can do it for your entire life, yeah. And it can make you that, that in parasites can make you extremely immunocompromised, and they don't know about that. You know, it's Michael Hingson ** 58:22 scary that not enough is being done to address the issue. It's like anything else. It takes some incredible, rude awakening somewhere before anyone starts to really focus on some of these issues. Tina Huang ** 58:36 Yeah, it's, it's a big reason why I was absolutely determined to get well is because I knew that I was going to have to get on stages and start to speak about this. I'm I'm not just trying to champion my own, my own experience, but my experience struggling with these toxic mold issues was absolutely horrific. It was hellish, beyond imagination, and there's not social support to help people like us, and it's just, it's horrific, and it needs to, it needs that needs to change.
Že sloviti Oliver Sacks je v eni od svojih knjig pisal o primeru bolnika, ki je zaradi jemanja zdravil (amfetaminov) doživel tri tedne izjemnih vohalnih zaznav in ojačanega vonja. Kaj se zgodi z možgani, ko pride do hiperozmije, kot s tujko poimenujemo intenzivne zaznave vonja? Kako pogoste so, kako jih prepoznajo? Ponavadi rinosinusitis povezujemo z zamašenim nosom in okrnjenim vohom, pa se lahko zgodi tudi obratno? O tem z dr. Juretom Urbančičem s klinike za otorinolaringologijo in cervikofacialno kirurgijo. Pripravlja: Mojca Delač.
A new book by the acclaimed neuroscientist Lisa Genova is always a big event. Genova, best known for her best-selling 2007 novel, Still Alice, has a new novel out this week, More or Less Maddy, which follows a 20-year-old aspiring stand-up comedian who is diagnosed with bipolar disorder. The protagonist, Maddy, grows up in affluent suburban Connecticut with a father who disappeared when she was young, leaving mysterious boats stranded on their front lawn – a hint at his own undiagnosed bipolar disorder. In our conversation, Genova emphasizes the importance of accurate representation in her fiction, having conducted extensive research with psychiatrists, psychologists, and people living with bipolar disorder. She explains that bipolar disorder affects about 2% of the general population and has a genetic component, with children of bipolar parents having a 10% chance of inheriting the condition. Our conversation explores how bipolar disorder manifests through episodes of mania and depression, with Genova noting that the average time to correct diagnosis is 7-10 years. She discusses the challenges of treatment, including medication side effects and the stigma associated with mental illness. Genova advocates for using the term "neurological disorder" rather than "mental illness" to reduce stigma. She explains that the new novel uses stand-up comedy as a backdrop, not just for its inherent ups and downs that mirror bipolar episodes, but also to explore themes of normalcy and identity. Genova stresses that while bipolar disorder is a serious condition, with proper treatment and support, individuals like the fictional standup comic Maddy can live functional and fulfilling lives.Acclaimed as the Oliver Sacks of fiction and the Michael Crichton of brain science, Lisa Genova has captured a special place in contemporary fiction, writing stories that are equally inspired by neurological conditions and our shared human condition. She is the New York Times bestselling author of the novels STILL ALICE, LEFT NEGLECTED, LOVE ANTHONY, andINSIDE THE O'BRIENS. Her first TED talk, "What You Can Do To Prevent Alzheimer's" has been viewed over eight million times. Her most recent TED talk, "How Memory Works--and Why Forgetting is Totally OK" was the sixth most watched TED talk of 2021. A sought-after speaker/edutainer, she has headlined in speaker series alongside Barack Obama, Joe Biden, Gloria Steinem, Jay Leno, Malala Yousafzai, Bryan Stevenson, and Goldie Hawn.Named as one of the "100 most connected men" by GQ magazine, Andrew Keen is amongst the world's best known broadcasters and commentators. In addition to presenting KEEN ON, he is the host of the long-running How To Fix Democracy show. He is also the author of four prescient books about digital technology: CULT OF THE AMATEUR, DIGITAL VERTIGO, THE INTERNET IS NOT THE ANSWER and HOW TO FIX THE FUTURE. Andrew lives in San Francisco, is married to Cassandra Knight, Google's VP of Litigation & Discovery, and has two grown children.Keen On is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit keenon.substack.com/subscribe
Dr. Sacks was a prodigious researcher, tireless clinician, voracious reader, competitive weight lifter, indefatigable traveler, influential neurologist, and long-winded correspondent. Host Jo Reed and AudioFile's Alan Minskoff discuss James Langton's narration of Sacks's letters, through which he seems to inhabit the great man's extraordinary mind. These revealing and erudite letters testify to Sacks's appetite for study, need to communicate, and insatiable yearning to solve problems. Read our review of the audiobook at our website. Published by Penguin Audio. Discover thousands of audiobook reviews and more at AudioFile's website. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
In this episode, I explore the intriguing condition of amnesia, the isolated loss of memory with the preservation of other cognitive disorders. I use remarkable patient anecdotes, such as those of musician Clive Wearing, and of Jimmie G, a patient of neurologist Oliver Sacks, to illustrate the diverse causes of amnesia, from herpes virus encephalitis to chronic alcoholism. I also narrate the clinical spectrum of amnesia with an emphasis on Korsakoff's syndrome and transient global amnesia or TGA. The podcast also goes back in time to review the case of Henry Molaison, the man whose profound amnesia, the consequence of experimental surgery for epilepsy, opened the way to our understanding of how memory works.
How to embrace life.Get all the news you need by listening to WBZ NewsRadio 1030 on the free #iHeartRadio app! Or ask Alexa to play WBZ NewsRadio on #iHeartRadio.
In this episode, I review the pathological and clinical dimensions of migraine, the most common disabling neurological disorder. I tried to capture migraine's diverse disabling recurrent symptoms, from its risk factors, triggers and prodrome to the aura, the headache, and multiple heightened sensitivities.To illustrate the lived experience of migraine, its classical manifestations, and its curious variants, I refer to such vivid patient memoirs as those of Monica Nelson titled Mere Sense, and Abby Reed titled The Color of Pain. I also cited Oliver Sacks classical book titled 'Migraine'.I also flavour the podcast with historical migraine patient anecdotes, such as those of Ann Conway, the enlightenment writer who was treated by the great physicians William Harvey and Thomas Willis, of Annie, who was treated with an astounding number of therapies by the famous Queen Square neurologist William Gowers, and of Alexander Pope who treated his migraines in a most unconventional way.In this regard, I relied on Migraine: A History, Katherine Foxhall's magnificent historical account of the medieval ideas and treatments of the disorder, and Soul Made Flesh, Carl Zimmer's exhilarating biography of Thomas Willis.The podcast also explores and the evolution of migraine's acute and preventative treatments, and how a better understanding of its pathology is leading to treatments such as those that influence the CGRP pathway.
Ravi dives into the extraordinary life of Dr. Oliver Sacks, the beloved neurologist and storyteller who humanized medicine. Joined by Bill Hayes – author, photographer, and Sacks' partner – they explore Sacks' groundbreaking career, his personal struggles, and the profound empathy he brought to his work that redefined how we understand the human mind. Bill then shares more about Sacks' creative process, the transformative power of their relationship, and Sacks' experimentation with psychedelics, part of a lifelong journey toward self-acceptance and love. Finally, Ravi and Bill reflect on Sacks' legacy, and what we can learn from his unique perspective on life, death, and the human experience. Leave us a voicemail with your thoughts on the show! 321-200-0570 --- Follow Ravi at @ravimgupta Follow The Branch at @thebranchmedia Notes from this episode are available on Substack: https://thelostdebate.substack.com/ Lost Debate is available on the following platforms: • Apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-lost-debate/id1591300785 • Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/7xR9pch9DrQDiZfGB5oF0F • YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ravimgupta • Google: https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly9mZWVkcy5tZWdhcGhvbmUuZm0vTERJNTc1ODE3Mzk3Nw • iHeart: https://www.iheart.com/podcast/269-the-lost-debate-88330217/ • Amazon Music: https://music.amazon.co.uk/podcasts/752ca262-2801-466d-9654-2024de72bd1f/the-lost-debate
Today, November 8, 2024, marks Science Friday's 33rd broadcast anniversary. One of the most beloved interviewees on Science Friday over the years was the late neurologist and author Dr. Oliver Sacks, who shared his insights into neuroscience, art, and what it means to be human. Recently, Sacks' long-time collaborator Kate Edgar published a book of Dr. Sacks' letters. And earlier this fall, the New York Public Library announced its acquisition of Sacks' entire archive.In this segment, Ira revisits a 2007 conversation with Oliver Sacks about his book Musicophilia. They talk about the way music and the brain interact, why music can sometimes remain in the brain long after other memories fade, and why a person with limited language abilities might still be able to sing unimpaired.Transcripts for each segment will be available after the show airs on sciencefriday.com. Subscribe to this podcast. Plus, to stay updated on all things science, sign up for Science Friday's newsletters.
Learn more at TheCityLife.org --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/citylifeorg/support
Zachary Quinto has played doctors before, but he's “never played a doctor like” the one he plays on NBC's Brilliant Minds (September 23). Quinto plays Dr. Oliver Wolf, “based on a real-life person called Oliver Sacks, who was a world renowned, iconic neurologist and prolific author, complex, interesting, dynamic, beautiful person.” One of the things that stood out to Quinto was how unique the show is. “There have been so many wonderful and influential medical dramas over the years, and a lot of them deal with cases that are easily identifiable or solvable...in our show, the mysteries don't often have a fix. I love living in that space of the unknown.” Quinto is most proud of being part of a show that often has a hopeful message. “It's looking toward the light. That's something I think we can all use a little bit more of.” But Quinto doesn't feel the pressure to sell the show, partly because it has “humor and heart and light and love, but also substance.” “I'm not really interested in having my experience or my life be dictated by things that I have no control over.”See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Rosh Hashanah, Jewish New Year, is approaching on October 2 to 4.The Gefilteria is the brainchild of Brooklyn NY residents Liz Alpern and Jeffrey Yoskowitz, champions of Jewish cuisine. Their specialty: gefilte fish that far surpasses the versions that have given this dish a bad name. I interviewed the authors of The Gefilte Manifesto in 2016; tune in to hear us talk about Jewish foods and a touching anecdote about the renowned neurologist Oliver Sacks' last meal: https://www.marionkane.com/podcast/brooklyn-duo-champions-gefilte/
As a former quant with six grandkids, my spidey-senses started tingling as soon as I heard about Ben Orlin's mission to make math fun. A native of St.Paul, Ben is a math educator and popularizer who is known for his “Math With Bad Drawing” blog and book series. Today's conversation revolves around his excellent, original new book Math for English Majors: A Human Take on the Universal Language, which reframes math as a language, complete with nouns, verbs and grammar. Like any mathematician worth his salt, Ben loves games, which he sees as ‘puzzle engines'. No wonder then that our conversation meandered and unfolded like a satisfying puzzle, touching upon rich concepts. We discussed making sense of sampling through fantasy towns where 70% of inhabitants are lawyers (not a town I'd like to be in), threw in a bit of Lewis Carroll to discuss the assumptions built into propositional logic (sometimes it really is turtles all the way down) and pitied the Welsh kids learning how to count (keep listening to know what that means). I hope you enjoy our conversation as much as I did! For more thoughts on the episode, the full transcript, and bucketloads of other stuff designed to make you go; “Hmm, that's interesting!” check out our Substack. Important Links: Ben's Blog Ben's Twitter Ben's LinkedIn Show Notes: A Mathematician's Obsession The Language of Algebra What the Tortoise Said to Achilles The Concrete and the Abstract Games As Puzzle Engines We're not Built to Understand Base Rates Why We Always Think About Samples Incorrectly Randomness and Wikipedia Rabbit-holing Counting in Different Languages The Concept of Zero Negatives as the Mathematical Language of Opposites Mathematical Escape Rooms Why Is the World Comprehensible? Discussing Infinity on Infinite Loops The Deep Mathematics of Music Ben As Emperor of the World Books Mentioned: Math for English Majors: A Human Take on the Universal Language; by Ben Orlin Math with Bad Drawings: Illuminating the Ideas That Shape Our Reality; by Ben Orlin Zero: The Biography of a Dangerous Idea; by Charles Seife Gödel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid; by Douglas Hofstadter Musicophilia: Tales of Music and the Brain; by Oliver Sacks
For the conclusion of Writers and Company, the tables are turned and author Madeleine Thien interviews Eleanor Wachtel. Recorded at the Blue Metropolis International Literary Festival in Montreal last spring, Thien speaks with Eleanor about her early life in Montreal, memorable moments from her career and more. They also look back on Eleanor's conversations with Antiguan American novelist and memoirist Jamaica Kincaid and British neurologist Oliver Sacks. Plus, Jeopardy! superchamp Mattea Roach joins Eleanor to talk about hosting CBC's new author interview show, Bookends.The entire Writers and Company archive will gradually be made available on the Simon Fraser University Library's Digitized Collections website. You can find it here: https://digital.lib.sfu.ca/writersandcompany-collection/writers-company
Tobias Picker, deemed “our finest composer for the lyric stage” by The Wall Street Journal, joins Devin Patrick Hughes on One Symphony. Tobias is a prolific composer in all genres. He has composed six operas, commissioned by Dallas Opera, LA Opera, Metropolitan Opera, San Francisco Opera, Santa Fe Opera, and Opera Theatre St. Louis. Tobias Picker has composed numerous symphonic works including three symphonies, concertos for violin, viola, cello, and oboe, as well as four piano concertos and a ballet. Picker's recent honors include the 2020 Grammy Award for Best Opera Recording of Fantastic Mr. Fox, and a lifetime membership at the American Academy of Arts and Letters. Thank you for joining us on One Symphony. Thanks to Tobias Picker for sharing his music and insights. Thank you to Visconti Arts for making this episode possible. You can find more info at https://tobiaspicker.com. Music Selections—all music by Tobias Picker, except for the first selection. Gian Carlo Menotti, Suite from Amahl and the Night Visitors. Performed by the Cleveland Pops Orchestra conducted by Louis Lane. First movement from Symphony No. 1; performed by the San Francisco Symphony. Edo de Waart, conductor. Awakenings, adapted from the non-fiction book by Oliver Sacks. Libretto by Aryeh Lev Stollman, produced by Odyssey Opera in 2023 of Boston in partnership with the Boston Modern Orchestra Project. Gil, Rose, Conductor. Directed by James Robinson. Commissioned by Opera Theatre of St. Louis. The Encantadas for narrator and orchestra. Based on the writings of Herman Melville. Sir John Geilgud, narrator; Christoph Eschenbach, conductor; Houston Symphony Orchestra. "Letter Aria" from Emmeline. Text by J.D. McClatchy Virginia Douglas, soprano Amir Farid, piano. Conducted by Modestas Pitrenas. Supported by Modestas Pitrenas. “I See A Woman” from Lili Elbe. Text by Aryeh Lev Stollman. Featuring Lucia Lucas as Lili. Performed by the St. Gallen Symphonic Orchestra. Old and Lost Rivers, for orchestra. Performed by the London Symphony Orchestra conducted by John Williams. Nova featuring Benjamin Hudson- Violin John Graham - Viola Fred Sherry - Cello Don Palma - Bass Tobias Picker – Piano. You can always find more info at OneSymphony.org including a virtual tip jar if you'd like to support the show. Please feel free to rate, review, or share the show! Until next time, thank you for being part of the music. https://tobiaspicker.com https://www.fox21news.com/business/press-releases/ein-presswire/674899601/devin-patrick-hughes-arapahoe-philharmonic-conductor-presents-a-new-discovery-concert-this-holiday-season/
How does someone with a movement disorder that effects executive functioning suddenly move to music with a dance tempo? Concetta M. Tomaino, Executive Director and Co-founder of the Institute for Music and Neurologic Function, and long-time collaborator with famed British neurologist Oliver Sacks, explores the power of music to reach those with dementia and other neurologic conditions. Tomaino dives into the research with host, Meryl Comer on ways to use music to awaken cognitive reserve in our loved ones deep into late-stage Alzheimer's disease. You won't want to miss this episode in BrainStorm's six-part series that showcases researchers & clinicians featured in Renee Fleming's anthology Music and Mind: Harnessing the Arts for Health. Support for BrainStorm by UsAgainstAlzheimer's is provided by Biogen and Genentech. Support the Show.
Welcome to Building Brand You™, the podcast that helps you accelerate your success by unlocking your greatest asset – you. KEY TAKEAWAYS: Talk is fundamental to human interaction, talk is inherently purposeful. There are ways of talking, and we all have them - some voices come harder to some people than others but there's no reason why we can't do them all. When meetings are viewed as chapters within a broader issue, it assists in dissecting the problem and engaging all participants in sharing their viewpoints. "To act wisely actually is to take responsibility for our own actions and their impacts on others" - Alan Robertson RESOURCES MENTIONED: On the Front Line: The Collected Journalism of Marie Colvin https://www.amazon.co.uk/Front-Line-Collected-Journalism-2012-04-26/dp/B01K3IQ44E An Anthropologist on Mars by Oliver Sacks; https://www.amazon.co.uk/Anthropologist-Mars-Oliver-Sacks/dp/0330343475 ABOUT OUR GUEST: Alan Robertson has committed his working life to facilitating personal, interpersonal and organisational development. In roles ranging from industrial relations negotiator to business psychologist, executive director to executive coach, visiting university teaching fellow to business entrepreneur, his interest throughout has been on how the quality of communication can improve human interactions, relationships, performance and fulfillment. The culmination of this work is his TalkWise project and his VoicePrint tools for other consultants to use in raising the awareness, skill and impact with which they and their clients talk and listen. CONNECT WITH ALAN ROBERTSON: Email: alan@businesscognition.co.uk Email: hello@talk-wise.com Website: https://letstalk.voiceprint.global/voiceprint-accreditation/ LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/alan-robertson-11010414/ Podcast: https://talk-wise.com/podcast/ ABOUT KYM HAMER: Kym Hamer is an international leadership, visibility and impact coach, a personal branding expert and serial entrepreneur, and the creator of Building Brand You™, a methodology helping organisations, teams, and individuals to build visibility and reputational rigor as essential building blocks for delivering sustained business value. In other words, accelerating results by unlocking your greatest asset - YOU! In 2020, just one year after launching her first business, she was nominated by Thinkers360 as one of the Top 100 Women B2B Leadership influencers and is currently in the Top 15 Personal Branding and Marketing Influencers in the world. For 4 years running Kym has also been one of Thinkers360's Top 10 Thought Leaders on Entrepreneurship and in 2023, was recognised as one of their Top Voices for 2023 globally. Kym is the Founder & CEO of Artemis Futures International, a Founding Board Member of the Customer Experience & Service Association Middle East, and co-founder of CXSA Group Ltd. She has been part of the faculty with Homeward Bound Projects, a global initiative reaching 1.8 billion people, equipping women and non-binary people with a STEMM background to lead conversations for a sustainable future. She voyaged to Antarctica in 2023 for 19 nights delivering the immersive component of the HB programme for more than 170 women, and was Faculty Lead for Homeward Bound's 8th leadership cohort. In between all of these things, you'll find her curled up in a corner with her nose in a book. Building Brand You™: JOIN the BBY Facebook Group - https://www.facebook.com/groups/buildingbrandyou SUBSCRIBE to the BBY Podcast on: (Apple) - https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/building-brand-you/id1567407273 (Spotify) - https://open.spotify.com/show/4Ho26pAQ5uJ9h0dGNicCIq SIGN UP to The BBY Bookshelf - https://bit.ly/BBYBookshelf CONNECT WITH KYM HAMER: LinkedIn - https://linkedin.com/in/kymhamer/ Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/kymhamerartemis/ Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/kymhamerartemis/ TikTok - https://www.tiktok.com/@kymhamer Thinkers360 - https://bit.ly/thinkers360-kymhamer-BBY Find out about BBY Coaching - https://calendly.com/kymhamer/bbychat/ HOSTED BY: Kym Hamer DISCLAIMER: The views, information, or opinions expressed during the Building Brand You™ podcast series are solely those of the individuals involved. They do not necessarily represent any other entities, agencies, organisations, or companies. Building Brand You™ is not responsible and does not verify the accuracy of any of the information in the podcast available for listening on this site. The primary purpose of this podcast is to educate and inform. This podcast does not constitute legal advice or services.
How can someone with supposedly no memory recognize a familiar melody? Concetta M. Tomaino, Executive Director and Co-founder of the Institute for Music and Neurologic Function, and long-time collaborator with famed British neurologist Oliver Sacks, dives into the research with host, Meryl Comer. Tomaino shares clinical techniques to help us reach and awaken cognitive reserve in our loved ones with music deep into late-stages of Alzheimer's disease. You won't want to miss this episode in BrainStorm's six-part series that showcases researchers & clinicians featured in Renee Fleming's anthology Music and Mind: Harnessing the Arts for Health.Support for BrainStorm by UsAgainstAlzheimer's is provided by Biogen and Genentech. Support the Show.
From the time of Eden, God continually invites his sons and daughters to experience fierce mastery in powerful acts of creation that bring beauty, life, and order to this world. In the second half of the series, John and Allen offer examples of how God-given creativity leads to human flourishing and restoration, including personal stories from their own writing careers.Show Notes: The book referenced is Musicophilia by Oliver Sacks. Discover more about Allen's coaching services for writers at withallen.com/coaching._______________________________________________There is more.Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Ask us at Questions@WildatHeart.orgSupport the mission or find more on our website: WildAtHeart.org or on our app.Apple: Wild At Heart AppAndroid: Wild At Heart AppEpisode Number 781Watch on YouTubeMore pauses available in the One Minute Pause app for Apple iOS and Android.Apple: One Minute Pause AppAndroid: One Minute Pause App
First aired back in 2013, we originally released this episode to celebrate the 80th birthday of one of our favorite human beings, Oliver Sacks. To celebrate, his good friend, and our former co-host Rober Krulwich, asks the good doctor to look back, and explain how thousands of worms and a motorbike accident led to a brilliant writing career.We have some exciting news! In the “Zoozve” episode, Radiolab named its first-ever quasi-moon, and now it's your turn! Radiolab has teamed up with The International Astronomical Union to launch a global naming contest for one of Earth's quasi-moons. This is your chance to make your mark on the heavens. Submit your name ideas now through September, or vote on your favorites starting in November: https://radiolab.org/moon.Our newsletter comes out every Wednesday. It includes short essays, recommendations, and details about other ways to interact with the show. Sign up (https://radiolab.org/newsletter)!Radiolab is supported by listeners like you. Support Radiolab by becoming a member of The Lab (https://members.radiolab.org/) today.Follow our show on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook @radiolab, and share your thoughts with us by emailing radiolab@wnyc.org.Leadership support for Radiolab's science programming is provided by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, Science Sandbox, a Simons Foundation Initiative, and the John Templeton Foundation. Foundational support for Radiolab was provided by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation.
EVEN MORE about this episode!Join us for the incredible story of Dr. Tony Cicoria, a retired orthopedic surgeon whose life changed dramatically after being struck by lightning at Sleepy Hollow Lake. He takes us through the chaotic moments of his out-of-body experience and his mother-in-law's desperate attempts to revive him. This event not only changed his outlook on life but also sparked an unexpected passion for classical piano music.Dr. Cicoria describes how he woke up with an unquenchable thirst for classical music, despite a lifelong love for rock and roll. A vivid dream of performing original compositions drove him to learn the piano from scratch, leading to a remarkable personal transformation. His story highlights the mysterious ways our minds adapt after traumatic experiences and proves that unexpected events can lead to profound growth.Beyond music, Dr. Cicoria talks about how his near-death experience affected his spirituality and personal relationships. He shares his journey from a Catholic upbringing to profound spiritual encounters, discussing his evolving beliefs and the balance between his personal and professional life. We also touch on the connection between music frequencies and spiritual communication, offering tips for tuning into your own spiritual frequency. This episode explores how a life-altering event can reshape your purpose, ignite new passions, and deepen your understanding of life's spiritual side.Guest Biography:Dr. Tony Cicoria is a retired, board-certified orthopedic surgeon who was Chief of Orthopedics at Chenango Memorial Hospital in Norwich, New York, and a Clinical Assistant Professor of Orthopedics at SUNY Upstate Medical School in Syracuse. He holds a BS in Biology from The Citadel and an MD, PhD from the Medical University of South Carolina. He completed his orthopedic surgery residency at the University of Virginia.Dr. Cicoria's musical career began in an extraordinary way when he was struck by lightning in 1994 while speaking on a public telephone during a family reunion near Albany. This incident led to a presumed cardiac arrest, near-death experience (NDE), and out-of-body experience (OBE). Shortly afterward, he developed an insatiable desire to hear and play the piano, and began composing music that first came to him in a dream. He taught himself piano from 1995 to 1997, and then received formal instruction from Sandra (Campbell) McKane starting in 1998.Due to his remarkable introduction to music, Dr. Cicoria was featured in the New Yorker article "A Bolt from the Blue" by Oliver Sacks, MD, and in Dr. Sacks' book "Musicophilia: Tales of Music and the Brain."Episode Chapters:(0:00:01) - Journey With Dr. Tony Cicoria(0:12:23) - Unexpected Passion for Classical Piano Music(0:21:14) - Spirituality and Near-Death Experiences(0:37:57) - Music and Spirit Communication Frequency(0:48:35) - Spiritual Awakening and HealingPlease join Julie next week with your question.Thursdays at 8pm ET, 7pm CT, 5pm PT.https://askjulieryanshow.comAnd, please leave a five-star review and subscribe so you can hear all the new episodes.Sponsors & RecommendationsDisclaimer: This show is for informational purposes only. It is not intended to be medical, psychological, financial or legal advice. Please contact a licensed professional. The Ask Julie Ryan show, Julie Ryan, and all parties involved in producing, recording and distributing it assume no responsibility for listener's actions based on any information heard on this or any Ask Julie Ryan shows or podcasts.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
A theocrat and a secularist duke it out in Louisiana. We ask whether Justice Samuel Alito should recuse himself. We report state/church complaints in Minnesota, California, Tennessee and Virginia. FFRF Legal Fellow Hirsh Joshi tells us how his letter to a Missouri school district successfully stopped prayers at graduation. Then we talk with neurology Professor Susan R. Barry about her new book, Dear Oliver: An Unexpected Friendship with Oliver Sacks.
Indomethacin-responsive headache disorders are rare conditions whose hallmark is an absolute response to the medicine and include paroxysmal hemicrania and hemicrania continua. In this episode, Gordon Smith, MD, FAAN, speaks with Peter Goadsby, MD, PhD, FRS, author of the article “Indomethacin-Responsive Headache Disorders,” in the Continuum® April 2024 Headache issue. Dr. Smith is a Continuum® Audio interviewer and professor and chair of neurology at Kenneth and Dianne Wright Distinguished Chair in Clinical and Translational Research at Virginia Commonwealth University in Richmond, Virginia. Dr. Goadsby is a professor of neurology at King's College London in London, United Kingdom and professor emeritus of neurology at the University of California, Los Angeles in Los Angeles, California. Additional Resources Read the article: Indomethacin-Responsive Headache Disorders Subscribe to Continuum: continpub.com/Spring2024 Earn CME (available only to AAN members): continpub.com/AudioCME Continuum® Aloud (verbatim audio-book style recordings of articles available only to Continuum® subscribers): continpub.com/Aloud More about the American Academy of Neurology: aan.com Social Media facebook.com/continuumcme @ContinuumAAN Host: @gordonsmithMD Guest: @petergoadsby Transcript Dr Jones: This is Dr Lyell Jones, Editor-in-Chief of Continuum, the premier topic-based neurology clinical review and CME journal from the American Academy of Neurology. Thank you for joining us on Continuum Audio, a companion podcast to the journal. Continuum Audio features conversations with the guest editors and authors of Continuum, who are the leading experts in their fields. Subscribers to the Continuum journal can read the full article or listen to verbatim recordings of the article by visiting the link in the Show Notes. Subscribers also have access to exclusive audio content not featured on the podcast. As an ad-free journal entirely supported by subscriptions, if you're not already a subscriber, we encourage you to become one. For more information on subscribing, please visit the link in the Show Notes. AAN members: Stay tuned after the episode to hear how you can get CME for listening. Dr Smith: This is Dr Gordon Smith. Today, I've got the great pleasure of interviewing Dr Peter Goadsby on indomethacin-responsive headache disorders, which is part of the April 2024 Continuum issue on headache. Dr. Goadsby is a Professor of Neurology at King's College London, in London, United Kingdom and a Professor Emeritus of Neurology at the University of California, Los Angeles, which is located in Los Angeles, California. Dr Goadsby, welcome to the podcast. Well Peter, I'm super excited to have the opportunity to talk to you. And I think, before we begin, we probably ought to expand on your introduction. I think there may be three or four neurologists who don't know who you are, and I think they should know who you are because you've got a really amazing story. These are exciting times in headache, right? And a lot of that's because of your work and you've been widely acknowledged for that; you received the appropriately named “Brain Prize,” which (if I'm correct) is the largest neuroscience award in the world; got to meet Danish royalty; you're - more recently, the ABF Scientific Breakthrough Award, which is super excited. So, particularly interested in hearing about your Continuum article. But before we get there, I think it would be really great to hear your story. How did you get into this in the beginning, and what's inspired you along the way to the many achievements you've had? Dr Goadsby: Why, it's a very kind introduction. People have been nice to me. It has to be said, Danish royalty were very nice, I have to say, and the very jolly chap, the Prince of Denmark. I got into neurology - I guess it's all about mentoring for me. I got into neurology because I got into medical school pretty much by accident. I really wasn't that interested and heard a lecture by James Lance, who was Professor of Neurology, University of New South Wales, at the time. He was talking about a nondominant parietal lobe. I'd seen the case as a medical student; it sort of just seemed weird to me and I wasn't that interested. But he set out this way of thinking about things to try and understand why a clinical presentation is what it is - what he described as a physiological approach to clinical neurology. He described a number of things, but he described that in this lecture and then gave a reference to some work that Mountcastle did on nondominant parietal recordings from awake behaving monkeys in the Journal of Neurophysiology. And I thought to myself, “Wow, this is really interesting - you could really get to the bottom of something,” and had that sort of “puzzle-y” thing going on. And I thought Lance was just wonderful, so I became interested in that. And then eventually I asked him about research - actually, I asked him about research after a lecture he gave on migraine, and the explanation of the time was some circulating substance - probably just as silly now. I went up to him afterwards and said to him, I thought the explanation he was giving was wrong. Like, here was a global person - he described Lance-Adams syndrome; this was someone who trained at Mass General, trained at Queen Square; was the first professor of neurology in Australia. I was just – like, it was a stupid thing to do. But I couldn't resist myself - I told him I thought it was wrong. And he's very polite, and he said, “Well, perhaps you could come and help us by doing some research.” And I thought, “Okay, that's a very nice response.” Interestingly, his daughter described him as unfailingly polite at his funeral. Of the many things you'd say about him, he was a kind person. Whether it's science or just the way you practice - that word (kind) - you can know as much about a subject as you like, but if you're not kind to patients, you're probably in the wrong game. He taught me to be curious about a problem and got me interested in headache, and to be kind in clinical practice - just kind – and I think they were very important lessons. So, I got into it because of excellent mentoring, and I'd like to think I've helped some others along the way. Dr Smith: Well, you certainly have helped a lot of people, Peter, and what a great story. I'm reflecting - I think the first vignette in The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat was a right parietal syndrome - wasn't it? You've read that book? Dr Goadsby: Yes, I have. And I've met Sacks. When Sacks came to Australia, he wanted to see Lance, and Lance said, “Fine, but you have to meet me between the morning round and the afternoon clinical meeting.” And he got him to come and have lunch with him in the hospital cafeteria at the Prince Henry Hospital and invited me to this lunch. And I sat there and watched them chat. But it was a measure of Lance and how people were interested in him that Oliver Sacks had to get in a taxi and come out to a hospital cafeteria to have lunch if you wanted to have a chat. Because it was - it was a privilege to train with the person. You know, I've done okay, but I only do okay if you've got – you know, you can work with patients, you've got great collaborators, and you've got someone you can get advice from (a great mentor). Dr Smith: Yeah, that's actually really great words of wisdom for the residents and fellows and junior faculty listening to this. Maybe we should actually talk about your article, which was really great. Your article was on indomethacin-responsive headaches - and we can maybe talk about some specific questions - but what's the main take-home point? If our listeners needed to take or were to take home one point from your article, what would it be, other than it's indomethacin-responsive (that's in the title)? Dr Goadsby: Yeah, it's what it says on the jar. Well, I think the one thing to take home is that there are forms of headache that seem relatively pedestrian, like one-sided headache that feels like it ought to be migraine that's strictly one-sided, and a small percentage of them respond almost like switching a light off to indomethacin. So, I think you have to have a high index of suspicion. And I'm sure I give indomethacin to ten, twenty times as many people - or thirty - who end up (or even more, probably) who end up having a response. But we do it for a short period of time. For those who get the response - I can tell you, when they come back, they're crying, their partners crying, or the other day I saw one, their child's crying, because all of a sudden, you've basically fixed the problem up. So, the message would be, if you've heard about something and it feels a bit “maybe, could be” - you've heard this indomethacin thing - just do it for a couple of weeks. The worst thing that can happen is nothing (nothing happens). For a couple of weeks, they're not going to have a problem with the tummy (and I'm not advocating taking people with a active gastric ulcer, trying to bump them off). But you cover them properly, you give them a short trial, and occasionally in your practice, you will be so rewarded by that - you will dance home. Dr Smith: Well, this is going to be my next question. There are very specific criteria, right, for defining cluster, SUNCT, SUNA (and there was a really great Continuum Audio conversation I had with Mark Burish I'll refer our listeners to about cluster, SUNCT, and SUNA), but the indomethacin-responsive headaches - and even migraine - that sounds to me, as someone who's not a headache person, like, that could be challenging to sort out. If you see someone who has consistent, unilateral headache, do you just do an indomethacin trial, or do you select based on other criteria from the classification system? Dr Goadsby: I'd like to think I was aware of the criteria, and I am. But the longer I practice, the more I'm inclined simply to give the indomethacin and get the question off the table because I don't think there's a sine qua non; there's nothing that will - apart from the indomethacin effect - there's nothing that will convince me 100% to be able to not do it. I've seen enough people who haven't clearly read the classification in detail (patients, I mean) and took indomethacin, and got a response where you wouldn't have predicted it, and they're very happy and the story ends well. So, I would advise people not to worry too much about whether it ought to or not respond, but find out if it does. Dr Smith: So, the obvious next question is, how does this work? It's pretty unusual in medicine, certainly in neurology, to have something that's so dramatically effective. What's the mechanism? Dr Goadsby: Well, that's the easiest question - we don't understand it. It is particular to indomethacin - it's weird. Some patients will say, “We'll give you a little bit of a hint by telling you (maybe) that ibuprofen was useful,” but most don't give you that much of a hint (some will even say aspirin is useful). But we haven't really gotten to the bottom of it. What are the current thoughts? It must be something that's not simply cyclo-oxygenase because other cyclo-oxygenase inhibitors don't do that – so, that's helpful. The other broad things people think about are whether there's a nitrergic aspect to it. We've got some basic science work that can show that nitrergically induced changes in experimental animal model of these trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias can be modified by indomethacin in one part of the model, where naproxen (for example) can't. So, we think there may be a nitrergic component to it. The other thing is the structure of the molecule makes you think about melatonin, if you put the two up – it's a work in progress. Of the things I would like to do in my life, I'd really like to get to the bottom of it, I have to tell you, because if we could work out what it is that's great about indomethacin and then get rid of the GI thing . . . Then, if you talk about cure - because when people get a response to this (you know, the oldest reported case with a response took it for thirty-seven years; they died of something else) - and continue to respond. It's one of the sort of upsides and downsides when you diagnose it - you can tell a person that they're going to continue to respond (take a breath) until they die basically, because unfortunately, the problem doesn't tend to settle down - at least the treatment stays consistent. If we could get rid of the tummy problem, that would be real progress. Dr Smith: So, what do you do with the patient who has the tummy problem? Is there another approach? Dr Goadsby: Well, there's a range of things you try and do; you use PPIs (proton pump inhibitors) and H2 blockers pretty liberally; you try to get the lowest dose, and that's usually best done by the patient. I give them the ordinary-release indomethacin; it's an impression that I have, over the years, that the slow-release indomethacin is not as efficient (just as a recommendation). I let patients - they take it three times a day, or twice - I let them work out what the littlest amount is that they need, having given them a regime to iron it out, because they can work it out for themselves. It's a partnership. It'll be very individual. If someone wants to take two in the morning and one at night and feels happy, have at it. If they want to take one three times a day, if they want to take one at lunchtime - whatever they - let them work out the minimal amount. And the other thing that we found useful - small percentage (maybe one in five) will find the coxibs useful (like celecoxib), but that's not universal at all; it generally takes the edge off. A palpable percentage will find adding melatonin in can be indomethacin sparing. Then the other (probably most important) thing is that the noninvasive vagal nerve stimulator can be very useful in reducing indomethacin dosing or even getting patients entirely off indomethacin dosing. How that works, of course, is as mysterious in the sense of these problems as is indomethacin. But that's something really worth thinking about - can be very, very useful in getting the doses down. Dr Smith: You've been doing this for a while, right? And you've seen a lot of – Dr Goadsby: Let's not emphasize that “for a while” side, right, okay? Dr Smith: For a while – just a little while, Peter. Dr Goadsby: A little while. Dr Smith: I'm just thinking - and I'm a neuromuscular guy, so give me a little latitude - but when I was a resident, our concept of headache was pretty simple; it was migraine, classic or common, and we knew a little bit about cluster. And no one talked about SUNCT or SUNA or all these other things, and wow, what an amazing several decades it's been. What's the future look like? And - maybe think big – so, is a cure for migraine in the foreseeable future? What's coming next? Dr Goadsby: If you think really big (and I'll think really big), if “cure” means that we could control it sufficiently that you wouldn't notice it, I think that's very much - it's almost here, for some. Now, I think of it like cholesterol - someone's got high cholesterol; they take a statin, and if they don't get any problems, the cholesterol normalizes. I'm simplifying things (I'm not a cardiologist), but you take your cholesterol tablet - you take it once a day; everything's fine and dandy. You never get “cured,” as such, but the effect is an effective cure from manifestations of the problem - and I am simplifying things a little bit. If I look at it like that, then I think we're getting to a place where some patients, we can treat them so well, and the problem is so suppressed, and they have so few problems with side effects (and some have none), that we're really getting there. We saw a study of the promontory phase of migraine using a gepant (ubrogepant), and we saw the ability (if you recognize the attack early enough) to treat and never have pain. Never have pain. Well, that's pretty close. It might sound crazy to think about it as a cure because someone will say, “Well, they've still got their genes,” and so on. Fine. But migraine is about disability, and if you can stop the disability and give a person full function in their life, well, you're pretty much there. And we're getting there, as we understand the disease. Dr Smith: Really amazing. I have another question that I've actually been really dying to ask you. I'm a peripheral nerve guy, and you may not be aware of this, but those of us who are interested in therapeutic development in peripheral neuropathy, or advocacy, or recognition of neuropathy as a substantive, meaningful entity, are inspired by the work of you and your colleagues in headache. Examples might be advocacy for federal funding or having CDMRP funding - things like this. But an area where - I'm just curious - we spent a lot of effort (and it seems like it's been really transformational for you guys) is having taxonomy, which isn't a particularly sexy topic. But maybe you can talk about the power of having a taxonomic classification and getting towards a cure. Because looking through this Continuum issue - it's really remarkable – it's just all sorts of things that I never would have thought of twenty years ago, and each of them is treated a bit differently. Dr Goadsby: Yes. As with all things in medicine, if you don't get the diagnosis, you can't get to the base - you've got to be able to get a diagnosis. And our taxonomy, the International Classification of Headache Disorders, has gone through three editions. We're working on the fourth. I have the privilege of being the chairman for the fourth edition (the first three were chaired by Jes Olesen). I do think it's one of the absolute achievements of our field (and Olesen needs to be really feted for doing this) that we have a definition system - it's operational; it's reasonably straightforward; it's been translated into, like, forty languages; that every government on the planet that I know of - and I'm talking about (I think I'd better mention no governments) but every big government you can think of, without exception, has adopted (‘cause I'll just get in trouble with the ones I've mentioned) have all adopted this classification; all the health technology assessments (the FDA, for example; the European Medicine, for another example), the Chinese government (People's Republic), Taiwan. Just, all over the world, people use one thing. So, if we do a randomized control trial - there's one recently came out; it doesn't really matter which gepant it is - but you look at the results in North America, and then you look at the results that were done by the Chinese and the South Koreans in a study, and the placebo rates and the active rates are more or less identical. Because what we've been able to do is homogenize who gets into clinical trials and understand what's happening. So, if I get up and talk about whatever we're going to talk about now, like, in rural India, people will know what we're talking about; all the neurologists will be on the same page and so we can make progress. And when we make progress, it's global progress because we sing from the same hymn sheets. I think the taxonomy has been really important for this. And, of course, if you get the diagnosis right, then you can start to begin to get the treatments right and you can bring all the knowledge from randomized controlled trials. There's no point having a whole lot of data if you can't apply it, and what's great about our taxonomy is we can apply it everywhere in the world. Dr Smith: Wow, what a cool answer. So, I have a follow up question for you, Peter, which has to do with reproducibility. This is a huge issue, right? In reproducibility and clinical trial evidence and in many fields, this has been a big issue - in psychiatry and other areas of neurology, where trials are nonreproducible. To what extent do you think this problem in other fields is a taxonomic problem, or a internal validity problem, in terms of the populations being recruited? I'm really impressed to hear that you don't have that problem in headache. Dr Goadsby: I do think one of the advantages that the International Classification of Headache Disorders has given us (International Headache Society being the proponent of that) is that there's clinical homogeneity, relatively speaking, in our clinical trial populations. This comes back to the clinic; good clinical trials are as much about the clinicians who are involved and the care they take in recruiting patients, and so on. Which is not to say that psychiatrists are not careful - not at all. But I do think that if you want to just test a question, everyone in the laboratory will tell you that you need to have - say you're doing work with rodents, for example; you want about the same weight, you want the same strain, they're eating about the same, they're up and down at night - everything is about the same. If you want to do good clinical trial work, you have to tidy up as much as you can so the only thing that's really impacting upon the question is the medicine, or the placebo, or whatever that you're testing. So, I think you're right. I think sometimes the pain people struggle with this because, as you say, a painful neuropathy can come from a lot of places. Well, if you just take all of those etiologies, you throw them into one study, and you test it against something, it doesn't surprise me that that's not so useful, compared to taking an individual thing that's really well defined - where you've understood the clinical side, you've understood the pathophysiology as much as you could - and just test that, one at a time. I think that's been a good lesson for us. And that's why there's nothing that's ever failed in a migraine clinical trial (a properly designed one) that ever was useful, and nothing that was ever successful that didn't continue to be successful. Now, some things were successful, and they produced, like, liver enzyme problems - so, that's “no win-no foul” situation. But the homogeneity's been quite important, I think. And it comes back to good clinical practice. Dr Smith: Well, thank you for the roadmap - that's really, really interesting. I'd like to finish up with another shift in gears, and to talk about workforce. Obviously, we have a national shortage of neurologists in the United States. We're never going to be able to train enough headache neurologists to take care of all headache patients, and we need to think about systems of care, which I guess we could talk about. But my question for you is, what would you say - a lot of residents listen to Continuum Audio, and hopefully, more medical students in the future and now - what do you say to them about a career in headache? Listening to this, I kind of feel like I want to go do a headache fellowship - it's pretty exciting. What's your pitch to them? Dr Goadsby: I'll tell you one small thing first before I say that; I did do twelve months in clinical neurophysiology, doing nerve conduction, muscle biopsies, evoked potentials. I actually did over ninety muscle biopsies (needle muscle biopsies) when I was training, so I understand your feeling. But I just got the feeling many years earlier than you've had it. What do I say to residents? Well, headache is an area where you can make a diagnosis, you can manage the patient, and you can make them better. I'd say to the resident, “Ask - just look in the mirror and ask yourself, why did you get into medicine?” You got into medicine to help people, and headache is an area where you can really help them. Plus, there's tens of millions of people with the problem, so you will always be in demand. And one of the great things about headache (I think it's probably true of neuromuscular) is it's also a very good lifestyle choice because our problems are generally with primary headache disorders - are not emergent (people don't tend to ring you up at night), and it's not really an on-call issue. You can have a proper balanced existence (work-life balance), and you can do it in a way that's really enjoyable. And then there's an extra bonus: there's all the wonderful neuroscience and neuropharmacology that's going on in headache. I just think if a resident looks in the mirror and says, “Why am I doing this?” most of them are going to look back at themselves and say, “Because I want to do good.” And they also want to do good in a way that they can have a proper life themselves. And if they're the two answers you got back when you look in the mirror (“I want to do good” and “I want to have some life myself”) - headache - that's the place to go, because there's plenty of room and you can do both. Dr Smith: Well Peter, that's great - sign me up. And I think people know where to find you to call for a recommendation. What a great conversation and a really great article. And again, I'll refer our listeners to Mark Burish's article on cluster, which is a really great companion to your article ‘cause it gives you the full spectrum of trigeminal autonomic cephalgias (which is pretty cool), and the rest of the issue is equally amazing. Peter, you don't disappoint. The next time you see the Danish Crown Prince, say “Hi” from me (I love Denmark - it's a lovely place to be). And thanks again for doing this. Dr Goadsby: Well, thank you, and thanks for the Academy for organizing. And the other thing about residents - if you want to stay in touch with neurology, stay in touch with the Academy; they're a pretty good bunch. Dr Smith: Couldn't agree more, couldn't agree more. Again, today we've been interviewing Dr. Peter Goadsby. His article on indomethacin-responsive headache disorders appears in the most recent issue of Continuum, on headache. Be sure to check out our Continuum Audio podcasts from this and other issues. And listeners, thank you very much for joining us today. Dr. Monteith: This is Dr Teshamae Monteith, Associate Editor of Continuum Audio. If you've enjoyed this episode, you'll love the journal, which is full of in-depth and clinically relevant information important for neurology practice. Right now, during our Spring Special, all subscriptions are 15% off. Go to Continpub.com/Spring2024, or use the link in the episode notes to learn more and take advantage of this great discount. This offer ends June 30, 2024. AAN members: go to the link in the episode notes and complete the evaluation to get CME. Thank you for listening to Continuum Audio.
In this episode, we explore the significance of those wild patches on our lawns and why they're crucial for our buzzing friends. We also navigate the emotional landscape of new mothers who find solace, challenge, and joy in their pet companions amid the transformational journey of parenthood.Ever been face to face with someone you've known for years, only to realize you can't quite place them? Imagine that being your constant reality. Joining us is Stephanie Duesing, a mother who shares the startling discovery of her son Sebastian's covert struggle with blindness and prosopagnosia, a condition that profoundly alters one's perception of the world. Together, we traverse the intricate pathways of the brain that give rise to visual recognition and the impact that conditions like Cortical Visual Impairment can have on everyday life. Her story is one of resilience, scientific intrigue, and the paramount importance of awareness.The tale of Sebastian, who navigated the world with topographical agnosia, challenges our understanding of perception and raises poignant questions about how we support those with unseen disabilities. Through this episode's intimate discussions, we gain insights into the power of the human brain and the unexpected pathways it can take, drawing parallels with the legendary neurologist Dr. Oliver Sacks. Prepare to embark on a narrative journey that offers both enlightenment and empathy, reminding us of the diverse tapestry of human experience.Stephanie's Links: https://stephanieduesing.com/Bunsen and Beaker's Links:30% off the first month at Zencastr - use the code in the show!https://zen.ai/3LXIX2UYb1RLXwtWHHjryXAutdr3HS5EpVHMW80BOKgSave 10% at Bark and Beyond with the coupon code BUNSEN!The Ginger Stuffie is on presale so check the link here!Join The Paw Pack to Support The Show!https://bunsenbernerbmd.com/pages/paw-pack-plus-communityOur Website!The Bunsen and Beaker Website has adorable merch with hundreds of different combinations of designs and apparel- all with Printful- one of the highest quality companies we could find!www.bunsenbernerbmd.comSign up for our Weekly Newsletter!Bunsen and Beaker on Twitter:Bunsen and Beaker on TikTok:Bunsen and Beaker on FacebookSupport the Show.For Science, Empathy, and Cuteness!Being Kind is a Superpower.https://twitter.com/bunsenbernerbmd
Remembering is a tricky, unstable business. This hour: a look behind the curtain of how memories are made...and forgotten. The act of recalling in our minds something that happened in the past is an unstable and profoundly unreliable process--it's easy come, easy go as we learn how true memories can be obliterated, and false ones added. Then, Oliver Sacks joins us to tell the story of an amnesiac whose love for his wife and music transcend his 7-second memory.Our newsletter comes out every Wednesday. It includes short essays, recommendations, and details about other ways to interact with the show. Sign up (https://radiolab.org/newsletter)!Radiolab is supported by listeners like you. Support Radiolab by becoming a member of The Lab (https://members.radiolab.org/) today.Follow our show on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook @radiolab, and share your thoughts with us by emailing radiolab@wnyc.org.Leadership support for Radiolab's science programming is provided by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, Science Sandbox, a Simons Foundation Initiative, and the John Templeton Foundation. Foundational support for Radiolab was provided by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation.
join us on a profound episode of "Interviews with Innocence with Marla Hughes" as we delve into the life-altering experiences of Dr. Tony Cicoria, an orthopedic surgeon with a unique twist of fate. Once a typical medical professional, Dr. Cicoria's life took an unexpected turn when he was struck by lightning in 1994, leading to a near-death experience that unveiled his unforeseen talent in classical piano music and composition. In this episode, Dr. Cicoria shares his astonishing transformation from a board-certified Orthopedic Surgeon to a sudden musical savant, unraveling how a lightning strike led him to discover his hidden prowess in music. We'll explore his journey from the initial shock and the subsequent near-death and out-of-body experiences to his unexpected emergence as a composer and pianist. Dr. Cicoria will take us through his talk at the IAND's International Conference, providing insights into his research and the spiritual aspects of human history that his experiences have illuminated. His story, featured in Dr. Oliver Sacks' "Musicophilia: Tales of Music and the Brain," showcases the incredible interplay between music, the brain, and the human spirit. Discover how Dr. Cicoria's compositions, featured in his CD "Notes From an Accidental Pianist" and his upcoming book "On the Other Side of Life," reflect his profound journey and the lessons he has gleaned about life, death, and the transcendent power of music. Tune in to this captivating episode as Dr. Cicoria takes us on a journey of resilience, transformation, and the undeniable impact of the unseen forces that shape our lives. Tags: #TonyCicoria #MusicSavant #NearDeathExperience #ClassicalMusic #TransformationStory #OrthopedicSurgeon #InspirationalJourney #HumanSpirit #MusicAndBrain #InterviewsWithInnocence
join us on a profound episode of "Interviews with Innocence with Marla Hughes" as we delve into the life-altering experiences of Dr. Tony Cicoria, an orthopedic surgeon with a unique twist of fate. Once a typical medical professional, Dr. Cicoria's life took an unexpected turn when he was struck by lightning in 1994, leading to a near-death experience that unveiled his unforeseen talent in classical piano music and composition. In this episode, Dr. Cicoria shares his astonishing transformation from a board-certified Orthopedic Surgeon to a sudden musical savant, unraveling how a lightning strike led him to discover his hidden prowess in music. We'll explore his journey from the initial shock and the subsequent near-death and out-of-body experiences to his unexpected emergence as a composer and pianist. Dr. Cicoria will take us through his talk at the IAND's International Conference, providing insights into his research and the spiritual aspects of human history that his experiences have illuminated. His story, featured in Dr. Oliver Sacks' "Musicophilia: Tales of Music and the Brain," showcases the incredible interplay between music, the brain, and the human spirit. Discover how Dr. Cicoria's compositions, featured in his CD "Notes From an Accidental Pianist" and his upcoming book "On the Other Side of Life," reflect his profound journey and the lessons he has gleaned about life, death, and the transcendent power of music. Tune in to this captivating episode as Dr. Cicoria takes us on a journey of resilience, transformation, and the undeniable impact of the unseen forces that shape our lives. Tags: #TonyCicoria #MusicSavant #NearDeathExperience #ClassicalMusic #TransformationStory #OrthopedicSurgeon #InspirationalJourney #HumanSpirit #MusicAndBrain #InterviewsWithInnocence
072 Mind Traveler When he moved to California in the early 1960s, he befriended the poet Thom Gunn, began entering weight-lifting competitions and joined the Hells Angels on motorcycle trips to the Grand Canyon. As a medical doctor and a writer, he achieved a level of popular renown rare among scientists. He first won widespread attention in 1973 for his book “Awakenings,” about a group of patients with an atypical form of encephalitis or “sleeping sickness” who responded to a new drug treatment with a partial rebirth. In the film adaptation his character was played by Robin Williams. Today's dead celebrity is Oliver Sacks Famous & Gravy is created and co-hosted by Amit Kapoor and Michael Osborne. This episode was produced by Evan Sherer. Play our mobile quiz game at deadoraliveapp.com and sign up for our newsletter at famousandgravy.com If you enjoyed this episode, you may also like Episode 26 “Wild Thing” (Maurice Sendak) and Episode 35 “Likable Villain” (Alan Rickman). Links: Transcript of this episode New York Times Obituary for Oliver Sacks Live interview with Radiolab's Robert Krulwich From Our Neurons to Yours podcast from Stanford Neuroscience 1989 PBS Newshour Profile of Oliver Sacks Famous & Gravy official website Famous & Gravy on Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter Dead or Alive Quiz Game Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Are rare diseases themselves rare? Neil deGrasse Tyson and comedian Chuck Nice learn about the science of gene therapy and how it can treat and potentially cure rare diseases with Gaurav Shah, CEO, Rocket Pharma.NOTE: StarTalk+ Patrons can listen to this entire episode commercial-free here: https://startalkmedia.com/show/unlocking-gene-therapy-with-gaurav-shah/Thanks to our Patrons Ernesto Rodriguez, James Lewandowski, Juan Cornejo, Shane, Hayden Christensen, jacob vine, and Calina Lungu for supporting us this week.
© 2020-2025 Ivy Podcast Discovery LLC
