Podcasts about scientist rebellion

(02:00): Biolog: Når klimaaktivister kaster maling på kunst, "gør de det retfærdigvis eneste rigtige. Medvirkende: Tim Wodskou, biolog, medlem af Klimabevægelsen og Scientist Rebellion. (20:00): En enorm kinesisk øvelse har sendt Taiwan i alarmberedskab: »Ligner forstadierne til en blokade,« siger korrespondent. Medvirkende: Alexander Sjöberg, Berlingskes Asienkorrespondent bosat i Taiwan. (30:00): Hvis færre nyuddannede lærere skal falde fra, skal lærerstuderende med til de svære samtaler med forældrene. Medvirkende: Anneline Larsen, lærerstuderende, afgående forperson for Lærerstuderendes Landskreds og næstforperson i Dansk Ungdoms Fællesråd. (48:00): Politikere står i kø for at tage æren for høj beskæftigelse. Hvem har ret? Medvirkende: Gustav Elias Dahl, senioranalytiker i Arbejdernes Erhvervsråd. Værter: Anne Phillipsen & Mathias Wissing See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

(01:00): Tidligere topchef kritiserer titel-debat: 'Det er noget pjat'. Medvirkende: Leif Tullberg, stifter af transportvirksomheden DSV. (16:00): Simultantolkning i Folketinget "unødvendigt" og "hamrende dyrt". Medvirkende: Karina Adsbøl, 2. næstformand i Præsidiet og MF, Danmarksdemokraterne. (32:00): Ukraine sender droner til oprørsgruppe i Syrien. Hvorfor? Medvirkende: Rasmus Brun Pedersen, lektor i internationale relationer ved Aarhus Universitet. (40:00): Biolog: Når klimaaktivister kaster maling på kunst, "gør de det retfærdigvis eneste rigtige”. Medvirkende: Tim Wodskou, biolog, medlem af Klimabevægelsen og Scientist Rebellion. Værter: Anne Phillipsen & Mathias WissingSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Steeds meer wetenschappers roeren zich in het klimaatdebat. Eén op de drie spreekt zich er actief over uit en de helft is zelfs bereid om mee te doen aan protesten. Deze aflevering in het kort:⇨ Hittesterfte gaat flink toenemen⇨ Wetenschappers op de barricade⇨ Consensus over opwarming wordt onderschapDeze actiebereidheid onder wetenschappers blijkt uit internationaal onderzoek dat is uitgevoerd onder leiding van de Universiteit van Amsterdam. Reyer Gerlagh is één van hen. Hij is als hoogleraar verbonden aan Tilburg University en heeft zich aangesloten bij Scientist Rebellion, een zusterorganisatie van Extinction Rebellion. In 2014 schreef hij mee aan het IPCC-rapport. Door druk vanuit China en Brazilië met name werd een belangrijke passage uit dat rapport geschrapt. Dat frustreerde hem dusdanig, dat hij besloot om van zich af te bijten. Naast onderzoek doen en colleges geven, voert hij nu ook actie tegen de fossiele industrie.Luister ook | Klimaatverandering, kijk je weg of kom je in actie?Het overgrote merendeel van de wetenschappers windt er geen doekjes om: klimaatverandering wordt veroorzaakt door menselijk handelen. Toch onderschatten veel burgers die eensgezindheid, blijkt uit hetzelfde UVA-onderzoek. Zij denken dat die mondiale overeenstemming binnen de wetenschap veel kleiner is, zo schrijven de onderzoekers in het blad Nature Human Behaviour. De ongeveer 10.000 respondenten houden het op 85 procent consensus, terwijl het werkelijke percentage op meer dan 97 procent ligt. Volgens Reyer Gerlagh is dat opnieuw het bewijs dat de wetenschap zich moet laten horen.Luister ook | De planeet gaat richting 2,5 graden in het roodHarm windt zich intussen op over de EU Taxonomy, de nieuwe standaard voor eerlijke en duurzame beleggingen. Zo weten banken, pensioenfondsen en andere financiële instellingen waarin ze groen kunnen beleggen. De EU maakt in die richtlijnen ook plaats voor vliegtuigen die iets minder CO2 uitstoten. Een groep NGO's wil daar een stokje voor steken en stapt naar de rechter.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Steeds meer wetenschappers roeren zich in het klimaatdebat. Eén op de drie spreekt zich er actief over uit en de helft is zelfs bereid om mee te doen aan protesten. Deze aflevering in het kort: ⇨ Hittesterfte gaat flink toenemen ⇨ Wetenschappers op de barricade ⇨ Consensus over opwarming wordt onderschap Deze actiebereidheid onder wetenschappers blijkt uit internationaal onderzoek dat is uitgevoerd onder leiding van de Universiteit van Amsterdam. Reyer Gerlagh is één van hen. Hij is als hoogleraar verbonden aan Tilburg University en heeft zich aangesloten bij Scientist Rebellion, een zusterorganisatie van Extinction Rebellion. In 2014 schreef hij mee aan het IPCC-rapport. Door druk vanuit China en Brazilië met name werd een belangrijke passage uit dat rapport geschrapt. Dat frustreerde hem dusdanig, dat hij besloot om van zich af te bijten. Naast onderzoek doen en colleges geven, voert hij nu ook actie tegen de fossiele industrie. Luister ook | Klimaatverandering, kijk je weg of kom je in actie? Het overgrote merendeel van de wetenschappers windt er geen doekjes om: klimaatverandering wordt veroorzaakt door menselijk handelen. Toch onderschatten veel burgers die eensgezindheid, blijkt uit hetzelfde UVA-onderzoek. Zij denken dat die mondiale overeenstemming binnen de wetenschap veel kleiner is, zo schrijven de onderzoekers in het blad Nature Human Behaviour. De ongeveer 10.000 respondenten houden het op 85 procent consensus, terwijl het werkelijke percentage op meer dan 97 procent ligt. Volgens Reyer Gerlagh is dat opnieuw het bewijs dat de wetenschap zich moet laten horen. Luister ook | De planeet gaat richting 2,5 graden in het rood Harm windt zich intussen op over de EU Taxonomy, de nieuwe standaard voor eerlijke en duurzame beleggingen. Zo weten banken, pensioenfondsen en andere financiële instellingen waarin ze groen kunnen beleggen. De EU maakt in die richtlijnen ook plaats voor vliegtuigen die iets minder CO2 uitstoten. Een groep NGO's wil daar een stokje voor steken en stapt naar de rechter.

Wetenschappers klimmen steeds vaker op de barricaden. Ze organiseerden woonprotesten, stonden in toga op de A12, en bezetten universiteitsgebouwen uit protest tegen banden met fossiele industrie en met Israëlische universiteiten. Ze spraken zich uit over het vaccinatiebeleid en mengden zich in debatten over migratie en stikstof. Is wetenschapsactivisme een noodzakelijke reactie op onrecht, desinformatie, en de politisering van wetenschappelijke kennis? Of ondermijnt het de autoriteit van de wetenschap? Met vier wetenschappers die zich uitspreken over urgente kwesties - van klimaat en ecologie tot mensenrechten en gezondheid - ontleden we het fenomeen wetenschapsactivisme tot op het bot. Op zondagavond 21 juli ging Lara Billie Rense live op NPO Radio 1 (https://www.nporadio1.nl/uitzendingen/npo-radio-1-special/9bd0c490-410a-4c01-ad9e-0332dd799ed8/2024-07-21-npo-radio-1-extra) in gesprek met: * Efraïm Hart, arts en adviseur medische opleidingen bij het OLVG, is politiek actief voor de ChristenUnie en promoveert op ‘zorgactivisme' aan de Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam; * Yolande Jansen, universitair hoofddocent Sociale en Politieke Filosofie aan de Universiteit van Amsterdam, betrokken bij Scientist Rebellion en Dutch Scholars for Palestine; * Erik van Sebille, hoogleraar oceanografie en public engagement aan de Universiteit Utrecht, werkt aan een methode om de verantwoordelijken voor plasticvervuiling op te sporen; * Martijn Duineveld, universitair hoofddocent culturele geografie aan de universiteit van Wageningen, betrokken bij Scientists4Future en mede-oprichter van het onderzoeksplatform Climate Obstruction NL. Links naar besproken onderwerpen: * Boek: Merchants of Doubt, Naomi Oreskes (https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/merchants-of-doubt-9781608193943/) * Boek: Parasiet der kwetsbaren, Wanda de Kanter (https://uitgeverijpluim.nl/parasiet-der-kwetsbaren) * Boeken van schrijver: Ilan Pappe (https://www.simonandschuster.com/authors/Ilan-Pappe/167493452) * Netwerk Climate Obstruction NL (https://www.climateobstruction.nl/nl/nederlands-netwerk-voor-onderzoek-naar-klimaatobstructie/) Podcast Focus wordt gemaakt op de NTR wetenschapsredactie door: Host: Lara Billie Rense Redactie: Corlijn de Groot, Marieke Drost Techniek: Matthijs Lukassen, Stijn Goossens, Gerda Bosman Eindredactie: Gerda Bosman Vragen? Mail de redactie: wetenschap@ntr.nl (mailto:wetenschap@ntr.nl) Wil je op de hoogte blijven van onze programma's? Abonneer je dan op de NTR Wetenschap Nieuwsbrief (https://ntr.dmd.omroep.nl/x/plugin/?pName=subscribe&MIDRID=S7Y1BwAA04&pLang=nl&Z=1317075972)

Jeannette Eggers lever som hon lär. Förutom att forska om hållbart skogsbruk på Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet, är hon klimataktivist och engagerad i Scientist Rebellion, som består av forskare som gör civil olydnad för att förmå makthavarna att lyssna på klimatforskningen och agera. Jeannette är också aktiv i Rebellmammorna, en rörelse som växer så det knakar över hela världen, med det självklara kravet att våra barn ska få en rimlig framtid på en beboelig planet. Om du du vill stötta arbetet med att göra Klimatpodden så kan du sätta in en valfri summa på Klimatpoddens Swishkonto: 123-279 86 92. Tack!

Magnuz är docent i meteorologi och säger själv att han har radikaliserats. Nu kallar han sig klimataktivist. Han är en av allt fler forskare världen över som blir aktivister. Lyssna på alla avsnitt i Sveriges Radio Play. Med vita labbrockar lämnar de skrivbord och laboratorium för att gå ut och bli en del av ”gatans parlament” i protest mot att de som styr inte tar klimatkrisen på allvar.En klimatforskare som tagit steget mot att bli aktivist är luftföroreningsexperten och meteorologen Magnuz Engardt. Efter mycket övervägande följde han med de andra forskaraktivisterna upp på barrikaderna som en Scientist Rebellion. Reportern Catharina Ericsson Ulfves har följt honom och de andra aktivisterna under ett års tid för att förstå hur de resonerar och för att se vad de gör.Ett program från 2024Av: Catharina Ericsson UlfvesProducent: Ylva LindgrenSlutmix: Jakob LalérMusiken i programmet:Trentemöller ”Miss you”Ulfves/Redman ”Withering”

Forskare över hela världen har gått samman för att som miljöaktivister kämpa för att begränsa klimatförändringarna. Men engagemanget ställer etiska frågor på sin spets. Lyssna på alla avsnitt i Sveriges Radio Play. Drivna av frustration över att insatserna mot klimathotet är otillräckliga är flera beredda att inte bara demonstrera utan även bryta mot lagen genom civil olydnad i samband med protestaktioner.-– Våra beslutsfattare lyssnar inte på det vi har att säga, så jag ville göra mer.Det säger Jeannette Eggers, en av forskarna som anslutit sig till den internationella miljöaktivistgruppen Scientist Rebellion. Hon är själv nu misstänkt för flygplatssabotage i samband med en protestaktion vid Bromma flygfält.I programmet medverkar bland annat även professorn i miljövetenskap, Björn Hassler, som är kritisk till det sätt på vilket gruppen arbetar. Han anser att forskares trovärdighet kan försvagas om de även går ut som aktivister. MEDVERKANDEJeannette Eggers - forskar om hållbart skogsbruk vid Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet.Petter Kallioinen - doktorand och forskningsassistent på Institutionen för lingvistik vid Stockholms universitet.Katrin Uba - forskar om aktivism. Docent och lektor i statskunskap vid Uppsala universitetAlasdair Skelton – professor i geokemi och petrologi vid Stockholms universitet,Björn Hassler - professor i miljövetenskap vid Södertörns Högskola.James Hansen – klimatforskare. Tidigare forskningschef på NASA.Daniel Värjö - reporterNiklas Zachrisson - programledareAnders Wennersten - producent

We can't do this without taking power back.But with the systems of power so effectively tied up in the complex system of unelected officials, hidden relationships and the ownership of natural resources, there seems to be no clear strategy for taking power back. One theory of change is putting pressure on the system until it caves—becoming ungovernable at scale.Fabian Dablander, an energy transition researcher at the University of Amsterdam, and a member of the activist group Scientist Rebellion joins me to discuss that strategy: Is it possible? How do we do it? We also discuss nonviolence vs sabotage, hope and denial, and the tipping points of social change. We then confront power: Where does power lie? How much is power willing to give up? And should we recognise that power is not willing to come to the table to negotiate?© Rachel DonaldPlanet: Critical investigates why the world is in crisis—and what to do about it. Support the project with a paid subscription. Get full access to Planet: Critical at www.planetcritical.com/subscribe

In this episode of the Speaking Out of Place podcast, Professor David Palumbo-Liu interviews climate activist, astrophysicist and co-founder of Scientist Rebellion Tim Hewlett.Scientist Rebellion is a growing climate activist group with 1000+ scientists and academics across 32 countries. Members range from science students and professors to IPCC contributors and leading climate-related scientists. Through disruptive nonviolent action, Scientist Rebellion demands emergency decarbonization via economic degrowth. During acts of civil resistance, members wear lab coats, and volunteers organize the vast majority of the campaign activity."I think the more pernicious aspect is the way that science as a set of institutions fits into a paradigm that is doomed from the outset. For instance, if you look at the framing of the science within the IPCC reports and how that informs the construction of policy related to the climate around the globe, well, it's foundationally dishonest.If you frame an entire report around the need to keep temperatures below 1.5 degrees or 2 degrees, and all of the efforts that societies are going to make to do that, and you omit from the public discussion the fact that we have no chance whatsoever of achieving those goals...there's a really commonly used measure within climate science called the equilibrium climate sensitivity sample, which says basically how much heating do you expect per doubling of greenhouse gas and concentrations in the atmosphere? It's a robust metric, and that suggests that if you double the greenhouse gas concentrations, you should get at least two and a half, probably closer to five degrees of heating.So we're double impacting the world. We've doubled greenhouse gas concentration. So in what scientific world is it reasonable to construct your arguments around a fantasy like 1.5 degrees? So that's the kind of more pernicious aspect of it that allows corporations, the fossil fuel industry, and the government to keep on polluting, and the idea that the scientific community is saying, yeah, we can still reach these goals.”http://scientistrebellion.orgwww.palumbo-liu.com https://speakingoutofplace.comhttps://twitter.com/palumboliu?s=20

In this episode of the Speaking Out of Place podcast, Professor David Palumbo-Liu interviews climate activist, astrophysicist and co-founder of Scientist Rebellion Tim Hewlett.Scientist Rebellion is a growing climate activist group with 1000+ scientists and academics across 32 countries. Members range from science students and professors to IPCC contributors and leading climate-related scientists. Through disruptive nonviolent action, Scientist Rebellion demands emergency decarbonization via economic degrowth. During acts of civil resistance, members wear lab coats, and volunteers organize the vast majority of the campaign activity."I believe in the UK there have been over a hundred cases in the last year, many of them ending in jail, and that's a massive escalation in recent history. And yet we had one in February that was dating back to the founding action at the Royal Society, but we were being tried for there. And we did win that case. But I think all around the world, what we're seeing is a convergence of institutions of power to try to shut out truthtellers, to try to shut out activists and people who would hold those powerful actors to account.I suspect it's because they recognize that they are committing heinous crimes, and if there were to be true accountability, they would be the ones being prosecuted.We've seen top-down directives from the government which are blocking activists and people in court from making legal arguments. In our case, for instance, we weren't allowed to refer to human rights legislation. We weren't allowed to argue the defense of necessity that we're trying to avoid greater harm. There's a long-established principle in case law, but you're not allowed to make those arguments anymore because activists kept on winning. And that's extremely inconvenient to the government. So the government dictated they shouldn't be able to do that. And that's not something that's meant to happen in a separation of powers. So we're seeing this convergence, coalescence of these institutions to try to protect the powerful and to protect the status quo even though that status quo inevitably leads to the breakdown of society."http://scientistrebellion.orgwww.palumbo-liu.com https://speakingoutofplace.comhttps://twitter.com/palumboliu?s=20

In this episode of the Speaking Out of Place podcast, Professor David Palumbo-Liu interviews climate activist, astrophysicist and co-founder of Scientist Rebellion Tim Hewlett.Scientist Rebellion is a growing climate activist group with 1000+ scientists and academics across 32 countries. Members range from science students and professors to IPCC contributors and leading climate-related scientists. Through disruptive nonviolent action, Scientist Rebellion demands emergency decarbonization via economic degrowth. During acts of civil resistance, members wear lab coats, and volunteers organize the vast majority of the campaign activity."I think the more pernicious aspect is the way that science as a set of institutions fits into a paradigm that is doomed from the outset. For instance, if you look at the framing of the science within the IPCC reports and how that informs the construction of policy related to the climate around the globe, well, it's foundationally dishonest.If you frame an entire report around the need to keep temperatures below 1.5 degrees or 2 degrees, and all of the efforts that societies are going to make to do that, and you omit from the public discussion the fact that we have no chance whatsoever of achieving those goals...there's a really commonly used measure within climate science called the equilibrium climate sensitivity sample, which says basically how much heating do you expect per doubling of greenhouse gas and concentrations in the atmosphere? It's a robust metric, and that suggests that if you double the greenhouse gas concentrations, you should get at least two and a half, probably closer to five degrees of heating.So we're double impacting the world. We've doubled greenhouse gas concentration. So in what scientific world is it reasonable to construct your arguments around a fantasy like 1.5 degrees? So that's the kind of more pernicious aspect of it that allows corporations, the fossil fuel industry, and the government to keep on polluting, and the idea that the scientific community is saying, yeah, we can still reach these goals.”http://scientistrebellion.orgwww.palumbo-liu.com https://speakingoutofplace.comhttps://twitter.com/palumboliu?s=20

In this episode of the Speaking Out of Place podcast, Professor David Palumbo-Liu interviews climate activist, astrophysicist and co-founder of Scientist Rebellion Tim Hewlett.Scientist Rebellion is a growing climate activist group with 1000+ scientists and academics across 32 countries. Members range from science students and professors to IPCC contributors and leading climate-related scientists. Through disruptive nonviolent action, Scientist Rebellion demands emergency decarbonization via economic degrowth. During acts of civil resistance, members wear lab coats, and volunteers organize the vast majority of the campaign activity."I believe in the UK there have been over a hundred cases in the last year, many of them ending in jail, and that's a massive escalation in recent history. And yet we had one in February that was dating back to the founding action at the Royal Society, but we were being tried for there. And we did win that case. But I think all around the world, what we're seeing is a convergence of institutions of power to try to shut out truthtellers, to try to shut out activists and people who would hold those powerful actors to account.I suspect it's because they recognize that they are committing heinous crimes, and if there were to be true accountability, they would be the ones being prosecuted.We've seen top-down directives from the government which are blocking activists and people in court from making legal arguments. In our case, for instance, we weren't allowed to refer to human rights legislation. We weren't allowed to argue the defense of necessity that we're trying to avoid greater harm. There's a long-established principle in case law, but you're not allowed to make those arguments anymore because activists kept on winning. And that's extremely inconvenient to the government. So the government dictated they shouldn't be able to do that. And that's not something that's meant to happen in a separation of powers. So we're seeing this convergence, coalescence of these institutions to try to protect the powerful and to protect the status quo even though that status quo inevitably leads to the breakdown of society."http://scientistrebellion.orgwww.palumbo-liu.com https://speakingoutofplace.comhttps://twitter.com/palumboliu?s=20

Today on Speaking Out of Place we talk with Dr. Tim Hewlett, co-founder of the international protest organization Scientist Rebellion.  With more than a thousand members in more than 25 countries, Scientist Rebellion stages non-violent protests, organizes events and talks, and lobbies other scientists and national leaders to draw attention to the need for immediate and meaningful action with regard to the climate crisis.In today's show Tim talks about the genesis of Scientist Rebellion, its tactics and strategies, and the blowback the organization is facing from governments seemingly more concerned about protest than the crisis itself.Tim Hewlett obtained his PhD in astrophysics in 2018 from the University of St Andrews, followed by a postdoctoral fellowship at the Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, researching cosmological relations between galaxies and supermassive black holes. In 2020 he returned to the UK and co-founded Scientist Rebellion, an international climate activist collective which focuses on organising academics in civil disobedience, arguing that if those who study the crisis do not act like they are in a struggle for survival the wider public cannot be expected to do so.  

Skal vi have en klimapolitik, som 80 procent af danskerne kan se sig i? Må ingen miste sit job som en konsekvens af den grønne omstilling? Eller skal klimapolitikken gøre ondt, før den gør godt? Medvirkende: Karin Liltorp, klimaordfører (M), Linea Søgaard-Lidell, klimaordfører (V), Franciska Rosenkilde, politisk leder (Å), Lea Korsgaard, chefredaktør, Zetland, Nikoline Borgermann, Scientist Rebellion, Emil Fannikke Kiær, politisk direktør Dansk Industri, Jannick Schmidt, professor, Institut for Bæredygtighed og Planlægning. Vært: Mathias Pedersen.

Skal vi have en klimapolitik, som 80 procent af danskerne kan se sig i? Må ingen miste sit job som en konsekvens af den grønne omstilling? Eller skal klimapolitikken gøre ondt, før den gør godt? Medvirkende: Karin Liltorp, klimaordfører (M), Linea Søgaard-Lidell, klimaordfører (V), Franciska Rosenkilde, politisk leder (Å), Lea Korsgaard, chefredaktør, Zetland, Nikoline Borgermann, Scientist Rebellion, Emil Fannikke Kiær, politisk direktør Dansk Industri, Jannick Schmidt, professor, Institut for Bæredygtighed og Planlægning. Vært: Mathias Pedersen.

Skal vi have en klimapolitik, som 80 procent af danskerne kan se sig i? Må ingen miste sit job som en konsekvens af den grønne omstilling? Eller skal klimapolitikken gøre ondt, før den gør godt? Medvirkende: Karin Liltorp, klimaordfører (M), Linea Søgaard-Lidell, klimaordfører (V), Franciska Rosenkilde, politisk leder (Å), Lea Korsgaard, chefredaktør, Zetland, Nikoline Borgermann, Scientist Rebellion, Emil Fannikke Kiær, politisk direktør Dansk Industri, Jannick Schmidt, professor, Institut for Bæredygtighed og Planlægning. Vært: Mathias Pedersen.

“The ways in which we really value property, that to me is an extremely infinite growth capitalism, hyper-masculine and extractive and colonialist thought — this idea that property is as important as like the lives and comfort and kindness that we show people. We must show that same love and kindness and respect to property. And so in that way, I think that we could redefine nonviolence to include property destruction, destruction of specific property, which is essentially doing violence upon future generations or present generations of people in the global south.”Are we really going to protect private property at all costs?That's the question myself and Rose Abramoff, an earth scientist and activist, circle around this week. We live in a violent world, one in which profiteering infrastructure kills, millions, threatens billions, and is tipping our planet over the edge. In the face of such violence, would sabotaging fossil fuel infrastructure really be an equivalent act of violence? Or would it be a necessary act of sabotage to protect life on earth? Rose is one of the first earth scientists to be fired for protesting against the climate crisis. We discuss the reality of the emergency, how to view taking action as a science experiment, the different kinds of action around the world, and the ethics of property destruction. Rose began her career as a forest ecologist and now studies the effect of climate change and land use change on the land carbon cycle, with a focus on plants and soil. As an activist, she works on a variety of environmental justice issues with Scientist Rebellion and other groups. She has engaged in nonviolent civil disobedience targeting colonial resource extraction, luxury emissions, and fossil fuel expansion and funding. Follow her on Twitter, Instagram and Mastodon at @ultracricket© Rachel DonaldPlanet: Critical investigates why the world is in crisis—and what to do about it. Support the project with a paid subscription. Get full access to Planet: Critical at www.planetcritical.com/subscribe

Peter Kalmus is a US climate scientist who's fed up with inaction. In April 2022, he chained himself to a bank in protest with a group called Scientist Rebellion. Now, during yet another hot summer, with Russia's war in Ukraine and the ensuing global energy crisis, are growing protests like Peter's the future? We hear from people demanding – and taking – radical action from around the globe. In this episode:  Peter Kalmus (@ClimateHuman), climate scientist at NASA Anote Tong, former president of Kiribati Lucia Newman (@lucianewman), Latin America editor for Al Jazeera English   ​​Monica Villamizar (@monica_vv), journalist with Al Jazeera's Fault Lines Karim Elgendy (@NomadandSettler), fellow at Chatham House Saleemul Huq (@SaleemulHuq), Director of the International Centre for Climate Change and Development Nisar Majid, research associate at the London School of Economics To hear more from the people in this episode, check out our climate playlist on Spotify. Episode credits: This episode was updated by Alexandra Locke, who produced this episode in August 2022 with Chloe K. Li, Negin Owliaei, Amy Walters, Ruby Zaman, Ney Alvarez, and Malika Bilal. Alex Roldan is our sound designer. Tim St. Clair mixed this episode. Aya Elmileik and Adam Abou-Gad are our engagement producers. Alexandra Locke is The Take's executive producer and Ney Alvarez is Al Jazeera's head of audio. Connect with us: @AJEPodcasts on Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook

Protest Delays MS Zuiderdam is the lead story this morning on Thursday Travel and Cruise Industry News, June 15, 2023 with Chillie Falls. About 60 rebels from Extinction Rebellion and Scientist Rebellion blocked the departure of the cruise ship Zuiderdam, which was docked at the Cruise Terminal in Rotterdam. Also today, Lack of Fresh Water on Carnival Elation; MSC Expands Shore Power Plan; CSSC Moves To Adora Cruises; Leno Names Carnival Venezia; Del Rio Liquidates Shares; and much more LIVE at 11 AM EDT. CLICK HERE to access video feed #scootaround #zuiderdam #hollandamerica #extinctionrebellion #scientistrebellion #carnivalelation #cruise #hollandamerica #nieuwstatendam #cruisenews #cruiseshipnews #cruise #chilliefalls #chilliescruises #travel #nieuwamsterdam #noordam #rotterdam #eurodam #koningsdam #Cruiseship #cruisetoc #westerdam #vacation #volendam Thanks for visiting my channel. Unsold inside, ocean view and balcony cabins for Labor Day Sapphire Princess Alaska Cruise. Details here: https://bit.ly/3XSeLWw NYTimes The Daily, the flagship NYT podcast with a massive audience. "Vacationing In The Time Of Covid" https://nyti.ms/3QuRwOS To access the Travel and Cruise Industry News podcast; https://cms.megaphone.fm/channel/travelcruisenews or go to https://accessadventure.net/ To subscribe: http://bit.ly/chi-fal As always, I appreciate super chats or any other donation to support my channel. For your convenience, please visit: https://paypal.me/chillie9264?locale.x=en_US Chillie's Cruise Schedule: https://accessadventure.net/chillies-trip-calendar/ For your special needs, contact me or Scootaround, https://www.scootaround.com/mobility-rentals, 1.888.441.7575. Use SRN11137 Check out my streaming partner: https://streamyard.com?pal=4889083533852672 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ChilliesCruises Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/chillie.falls Twitter: https://twitter.com/ChillieFalls Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/chilliefalls/ TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@chilliescruises Business Email: chillie@chilliefalls.com Accessible Travel Blog: https://accessadventure.net/ Chillie Chats With Sue Bryant, London Times Cruise Editor About Emerald Azzurra https://youtu.be/_bnrkqPf2gE Chillie Chats With Disability Advocate Kristy Durso https://youtu.be/EY3ZxxYGPCw Chillie Chats with Sylvia Longmire, Ambassador for Scootaround and WHILL Powerchairs https://youtu.be/VovRJ5Fh1I8 Chillie Chats With Special Guest Kevin Martin, 30 And A Wake Up https://youtube.com/live/7Q5AFPDD0YY Chillie Chats with Mark Chilutti on Accessibility of Oasis of the Seas https://youtu.be/ibuJe7sfvrA Chillie Chats With Kelly Narowski, Disability Rights Advocate and Avid Traveler https://youtu.be/NFB7LhkJ7go and https://youtu.be/LxbC5UW-Lsk Casino Loyalty Programs with Sue Sherer https://youtu.be/p0SsewJC_cE Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In this episode, we explore the intersection of science and activism in the fight against climate change. We delve into the growing movement of scientist activists, who are using their expertise and research to advocate for climate action through unconventional means, like civil disobedience. Our guest is Angeline Bruls, a PhD candidate at NTNU's Department of Biology. Bruls is part of the group Scientist Rebellion, who have an active group here in Trondheim. Together, we discuss the role of universities in the fight against climate change, where Brulss shares her experiences with NTNU, how Scientist Rebellion is influencing the university, and future goals. — The NTNU Energy Transition Podcast aims to function as a knowledge hub that empowers individuals and organizations in Europe and beyond to tackle climate change and move our global society toward carbon neutrality. New episodes every other Thursday. The NTNU Energy Transition Initiative was established to deliver world-leading research on energy transition strategies, to achieve the Paris ambitions in an efficient and realistic way. Every March we organize the NTNU Energy Conference in Trondheim, Norway. You can find us on ⁠⁠Twitter⁠⁠, ⁠⁠LinkedIn⁠⁠, and on our ⁠⁠webpage⁠⁠. Please reach out by mail to ⁠⁠julius.wesche@ntnu.no⁠⁠.

* Trump & GOP Embrace of Political Violence Threatens to Extinguish Democracy; Rachel Bitecofer, political strategist, analyst and author; Producer: Scott Harris. * After 51 Years Campaign Continues to Ratify Equal Rights Amendment; Bettina Hager, Washington, D.C. Director of the ERA Coalition; Producer: Scott Harris. * Senior Climate Activists Protest ‘Dirty Banks' Financing of Fossil Fuel Projects; Ebony Martin co-Executive Director of Greenpeace USA & Rose Abramoff of Scientist Rebellion; Producer: Melinda Tuhus.

Ernst-Jan Kuiper obtained his Master's degree in Climate Physics In 2014, after which he focused on research into the dynamics of the Greenland ice sheet. After 5 years, including 6 weeks of fieldwork on the Greenland ice sheet, he obtained his doctorate (PhD) in 2019. Ernst-Jan currently works at Milieudefensie on the appeal against oil giant Shell. He also writes articles about climate change for the Dutch program Tegenlicht and gives lectures about climate change. He also spends time on climate activism, especially with Extinction Rebellion where he is part of the Scientist Rebellion group.   The day before we recorded this interview he was at an Extinction Rebellion protest with 80 other scientists, where he was arrested with about 700 other protestors. I asked him to explain the climate science that is so worrying that he takes to the streets to tell the truth about climate science. And also about the fact that he, as a scientist still has hope that we can do something against climate change. I also want to know why as a climate scientist he sees the court case of Milieudefensie against Shell as the most impactful thing that he could be working on right now.   Sources:  TED talk by Ernst-Jan: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KxRLQ-WDlRw  Ernst-Jan asks the Minister of Climate if he believes the science and if so, when he is going to update the policies for reducing The Netherlands' emissions to reflect the science: https://dezwijger.nl/programma/rob-jetten    I published my first article as an independent researcher. It is about my vision on the climate crisis, and you can read it here: https://futurebased.org/topics/earthucation-using-interdisciplinary-philosophy-education-and-science-communication-to-understand-the-climate-crisis/  For Dutch readers: I publish a column about climate madness on Joop: https://www.bnnvara.nl/joop/personen/V/mario-veen    This is an independent educational podcast.   I hope you enjoy the episode! Mario http://lifefromplatoscave.com/    I'd love to hear your questions or comments: Leave me a voicemail: https://www.speakpipe.com/LifeFromPlatosCave   Twitter: https://twitter.com/lifeplatoscave  Insta: https://www.instagram.com/lifefromplatoscave/  Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/lifefromplatoscave  Illustration © by Julien Penning, Light One Art: https://www.instagram.com/light_one_art/

EXPERTS PHILIPPE DESSERTINE Directeur de l'institut de Haute Finance NATHALIE SAINT-CRICQ Éditorialiste politique « France Télévisions » ARNAUD GOSSEMENT Avocat en droit de l'environnement Professeur associé à Paris 1 FLAVIEN NEUVY Économiste – Directeur de l'Observatoire Cetelem Si les zones à faibles émissions se sont multipliées ces dernières années dans les grandes villes d'Europe, en France la mise en place des ZFE fait de plus en plus polémique. De quoi parle-t-on ? L'idée au départ est de bannir les véhicules polluants des 43 plus grandes villes de façon progressive d'ici 2025. Dans un premier temps, sont interdits sous peine d'amende (68 euros) les véhicules au-dessus de "Crit'Air 3" (les diesels d'avant 2011, les "essence" d'avant 2006, soit 40 % du parc automobile actuel), puis ce sera au tour des "Crit'Air 2" (tous les diesels, ainsi que les "essence" d'avant 2011, soit 70 % du parc). L'objectif officiel est de faire baisser le niveau des particules fines qui tuent des milliers de personnes chaque année et d'inciter les ménages à passer à des voitures moins polluantes et notamment à l'électrique. Depuis le 1er janvier, en théorie, dans les villes de plus de 150 000 habitants existent donc des zones à faibles émissions. Mais les exceptions et les décalages se multiplient car le dispositif crée trop d'inégalités, la colère gronde chez les automobilistes et les oppositions se font entendre. Ainsi pour le secrétaire national du Parti Communiste Fabien Roussel, "c'est une bombe sociale parce qu'il y a aujourd'hui dix millions d'automobilistes qui vont être interdits de se déplacer". De son côté, la leader d'Europe Écologie-Les Verts Marine Tondelier déplore le manque d'accompagnement de l'Etat. Dans ces conditions, et parce que "le gouvernement n'a rien anticipé", elle juge nécessaire de "prendre son temps" pour déployer le dispositif. C'est ce qu'a d'ailleurs décidé la métropole lyonnaise gérée par l'écologiste Bruno Bernard qui vient d'annoncer le report de deux ans, à 2028, de l'interdiction de la circulation des véhicules diésel (Crit'air 2). A Toulouse et à Montpellier les élus Nupes-LFI demandent "la suspension de la ZFE". A Perpignan, le maire RN a fait voter une motion contre l'application de la ZFE dans la préfecture catalane en 2025. Et maintenant c'est au tour de 40 millions d'automobilistes de tirer à boulet rouge sur le dispositif. Prenant l'exemple de nos voisins allemands, précurseurs en matière de ZFE mais en train de faire marche arrière, l'association réclame son abandon pur et simple, dénonçant dans un communiqué une "mesure environnementale obsolète" et "une bombe sociale à retardement". Il faut dire que lorsqu'il s'agit de la voiture, le risque politique est toujours très fort : l'écotaxe sur les poids lourds avaient entrainé le mouvement des Bonnets rouges, la taxe carbone et le passage aux 80 km/h heure celui des gilets jaunes… Alors dans cette période déjà marquée par l'inflation et la contestation de la réforme des retraites, la grogne des automobilistes est scrutée par le gouvernement qui tente d'apaiser les esprits en se disant ouvert "au dialogue". Evoquant "14 pays en Europe où il y a des zones à faibles émissions", le ministre de la Transition écologique Christophe Bechu met en avant le fait lorsque "la qualité de l'air s'améliore, il y a des endroits où ces ZFE sont supprimées" comme en Allemagne. Car "cette mesure est prise pour des raisons de santé publique" rappelle-t-il. "La France a été condamnée par trois fois pour des dépassements de seuils de pollution." Mais cela implique aussi que "les villes qui ne sont pas en dépassement de seuil n'ont aucune obligation d'aller durcir, multiplier les règles" explique-t-il. Revenant, par ailleurs, sur la fin des motorisations thermiques dans l'Union européenne qui vient de connaître un revers majeur avec le refus de l'Allemagne de signer le texte, pourtant adopté au Parlement européen, le ministre estime qu'il s'agit là d'une "crise politique interne à l'Allemagne". "À l'intérieur de la coalition allemande, le plus petit des partenaires est aujourd'hui en train de remettre en cause la position allemande" mais "décarboner notre parc de véhicules, c'est le seul moyen de lutter contre le réchauffement climatique" juge-t-il. Le ministre chargé des Transports a exhorté de son côté l'Allemagne à soutenir à nouveau l'interdiction de la vente de voitures neuves à moteur thermique dans l'Union européenne en 2035, regrettant une "forme de fronde" de Berlin. "Si on ne garde pas cette ambition nous serons balayés sur le plan industriel et écologique (...) ce n'est pas en donnant des contre-signaux que l'on va réussir à créer cette voiture électrique accessible à tous" a déclaré Clément Beaune alors que le patron de Stellantis, groupe réunissant PSA-Citroën et Fiat Chrysler, s'inquiète d'une transition trop rapide vers l'électrique qui profiterait à la Chine. Alors les ZFE, une polémique française ? L'UE est-elle allée trop vite en voulant interdire les moteurs thermiques à partir de 2035 afin de réduire les émissions de CO2 ? Enfin qui sont ces scientifiques d'une vingtaine de pays, réunis au sein de Scientist Rebellion, qui lancent des actions de désobéissance civile afin de souligner l'urgence à agir pour le climat ? DIFFUSION : du lundi au samedi à 17h45 FORMAT : 65 minutes PRÉSENTATION : Caroline Roux - Axel de Tarlé REDIFFUSION : du lundi au vendredi vers 23h40 RÉALISATION : Nicolas Ferraro, Bruno Piney, Franck Broqua, Alexandre Langeard, Corentin Son, Benoît Lemoine PRODUCTION : France Télévisions / Maximal Productions Retrouvez C DANS L'AIR sur internet & les réseaux : INTERNET : francetv.fr FACEBOOK : https://www.facebook.com/Cdanslairf5 TWITTER : https://twitter.com/cdanslair INSTAGRAM : https://www.instagram.com/cdanslair/

EXPERTS PHILIPPE DESSERTINE Directeur de l'institut de Haute Finance NATHALIE SAINT-CRICQ Éditorialiste politique « France Télévisions » ARNAUD GOSSEMENT Avocat en droit de l'environnement Professeur associé à Paris 1 FLAVIEN NEUVY Économiste – Directeur de l'Observatoire Cetelem Si les zones à faibles émissions se sont multipliées ces dernières années dans les grandes villes d'Europe, en France la mise en place des ZFE fait de plus en plus polémique. De quoi parle-t-on ? L'idée au départ est de bannir les véhicules polluants des 43 plus grandes villes de façon progressive d'ici 2025. Dans un premier temps, sont interdits sous peine d'amende (68 euros) les véhicules au-dessus de "Crit'Air 3" (les diesels d'avant 2011, les "essence" d'avant 2006, soit 40 % du parc automobile actuel), puis ce sera au tour des "Crit'Air 2" (tous les diesels, ainsi que les "essence" d'avant 2011, soit 70 % du parc). L'objectif officiel est de faire baisser le niveau des particules fines qui tuent des milliers de personnes chaque année et d'inciter les ménages à passer à des voitures moins polluantes et notamment à l'électrique. Depuis le 1er janvier, en théorie, dans les villes de plus de 150 000 habitants existent donc des zones à faibles émissions. Mais les exceptions et les décalages se multiplient car le dispositif crée trop d'inégalités, la colère gronde chez les automobilistes et les oppositions se font entendre. Ainsi pour le secrétaire national du Parti Communiste Fabien Roussel, "c'est une bombe sociale parce qu'il y a aujourd'hui dix millions d'automobilistes qui vont être interdits de se déplacer". De son côté, la leader d'Europe Écologie-Les Verts Marine Tondelier déplore le manque d'accompagnement de l'Etat. Dans ces conditions, et parce que "le gouvernement n'a rien anticipé", elle juge nécessaire de "prendre son temps" pour déployer le dispositif. C'est ce qu'a d'ailleurs décidé la métropole lyonnaise gérée par l'écologiste Bruno Bernard qui vient d'annoncer le report de deux ans, à 2028, de l'interdiction de la circulation des véhicules diésel (Crit'air 2). A Toulouse et à Montpellier les élus Nupes-LFI demandent "la suspension de la ZFE". A Perpignan, le maire RN a fait voter une motion contre l'application de la ZFE dans la préfecture catalane en 2025. Et maintenant c'est au tour de 40 millions d'automobilistes de tirer à boulet rouge sur le dispositif. Prenant l'exemple de nos voisins allemands, précurseurs en matière de ZFE mais en train de faire marche arrière, l'association réclame son abandon pur et simple, dénonçant dans un communiqué une "mesure environnementale obsolète" et "une bombe sociale à retardement". Il faut dire que lorsqu'il s'agit de la voiture, le risque politique est toujours très fort : l'écotaxe sur les poids lourds avaient entrainé le mouvement des Bonnets rouges, la taxe carbone et le passage aux 80 km/h heure celui des gilets jaunes… Alors dans cette période déjà marquée par l'inflation et la contestation de la réforme des retraites, la grogne des automobilistes est scrutée par le gouvernement qui tente d'apaiser les esprits en se disant ouvert "au dialogue". Evoquant "14 pays en Europe où il y a des zones à faibles émissions", le ministre de la Transition écologique Christophe Bechu met en avant le fait lorsque "la qualité de l'air s'améliore, il y a des endroits où ces ZFE sont supprimées" comme en Allemagne. Car "cette mesure est prise pour des raisons de santé publique" rappelle-t-il. "La France a été condamnée par trois fois pour des dépassements de seuils de pollution." Mais cela implique aussi que "les villes qui ne sont pas en dépassement de seuil n'ont aucune obligation d'aller durcir, multiplier les règles" explique-t-il. Revenant, par ailleurs, sur la fin des motorisations thermiques dans l'Union européenne qui vient de connaître un revers majeur avec le refus de l'Allemagne de signer le texte, pourtant adopté au Parlement européen, le ministre estime qu'il s'agit là d'une "crise politique interne à l'Allemagne". "À l'intérieur de la coalition allemande, le plus petit des partenaires est aujourd'hui en train de remettre en cause la position allemande" mais "décarboner notre parc de véhicules, c'est le seul moyen de lutter contre le réchauffement climatique" juge-t-il. Le ministre chargé des Transports a exhorté de son côté l'Allemagne à soutenir à nouveau l'interdiction de la vente de voitures neuves à moteur thermique dans l'Union européenne en 2035, regrettant une "forme de fronde" de Berlin. "Si on ne garde pas cette ambition nous serons balayés sur le plan industriel et écologique (...) ce n'est pas en donnant des contre-signaux que l'on va réussir à créer cette voiture électrique accessible à tous" a déclaré Clément Beaune alors que le patron de Stellantis, groupe réunissant PSA-Citroën et Fiat Chrysler, s'inquiète d'une transition trop rapide vers l'électrique qui profiterait à la Chine. Alors les ZFE, une polémique française ? L'UE est-elle allée trop vite en voulant interdire les moteurs thermiques à partir de 2035 afin de réduire les émissions de CO2 ? Enfin qui sont ces scientifiques d'une vingtaine de pays, réunis au sein de Scientist Rebellion, qui lancent des actions de désobéissance civile afin de souligner l'urgence à agir pour le climat ? DIFFUSION : du lundi au samedi à 17h45 FORMAT : 65 minutes PRÉSENTATION : Caroline Roux - Axel de Tarlé REDIFFUSION : du lundi au vendredi vers 23h40 RÉALISATION : Nicolas Ferraro, Bruno Piney, Franck Broqua, Alexandre Langeard, Corentin Son, Benoît Lemoine PRODUCTION : France Télévisions / Maximal Productions Retrouvez C DANS L'AIR sur internet & les réseaux : INTERNET : francetv.fr FACEBOOK : https://www.facebook.com/Cdanslairf5 TWITTER : https://twitter.com/cdanslair INSTAGRAM : https://www.instagram.com/cdanslair/

Compleanno Parenziano ma editoriale crucianiano sul partito della Ztl. Pregliasco? Non eletto. Parenzo paragona Spatalino allo scovolino del water. Sergio da Trieste, già amante delle prostitute, ha appeso il pene al chiodo. "Ora solo per fare pipì"Vittorio Feltri, neoeletto in consiglio regionale, dichiara di divertirsi a offendere Parenzo. "13 mila euro di indennità? Per me non sono un c***o".Luca Trivellone di Ultima Generazione e Luca Masini di Scientist Rebellion difendono le azioni dimostrative contro i Jet privati. Cruciani molto arrabbiato. Lady Eva è una mistress, no vax e antigovernativa. Basta cosi per ascoltarla.

 This week is City Limits' Energy episode! First up, we listen to an excerpt from Democracy Now! featuriing earth scientist, ecologist, and activist Rose Abramoff, who was fired by her employer, the US Government, after incidents of high profile protesting, calling for her colleagues take direct action against climate change. Rose is a member of Scientist Rebellion, an organisation advocating for actions such as civil disobedience, and obvious policy solutions backed by data.  Kevin and Zeb follow this interview with a general comment and discussion with Dave Sweeney (nuclear-free campaigner, Australian Conservation Foundation), who discusses the disturbing and pervasive power of industry, at direct odds with irrefutable scientific fact. He describes the work of the ACF in tracking democracy, when "dark money in Australian politics is on the rise". Dave echoes Abramoff's sentiment to "remove the power, legitimacy and funding of the fossil fuel sector", drawing parallels with nuclear sector Australia: "justifications" for the push for nuclear energy & weaponry, muddying the waters, severity and longevity of risk-factors, and heaps more.  To find out more and get involved, check out the anti-nuclear webpages of Friends of the Earth and the Australian Conservation Foundation, as well as 3CR's own Radioactive Show.

"Das Klima”, der Podcast zur Wissenschaft hinter der Krise. Wir lesen den aktuellen Bericht des Weltklimarats und erklären den aktuellen Stand der Klimaforschung. In Folge 76 sind wir am Ende! Nämlich mit unserer Besprechung des 6. Sachstandberichts des IPCC. Ganz zum Schluss werfen wir noch einen Blick in die offizielle Zusammenfassung des dritten Teils. Und auf das “Technical Summary”. Und vor allem auf die Anfang des Jahres geleakte Version der offiziellen Zusammenfassung. Wir stellen fest: Da scheinen doch ein paar sehr relevante Stellen zu fehlen. Wir schließen die Folge mit einer Geschichte über die französische Käsekrise, was relevanter ist als es klingt.

We need drastic action to protect our planet — there's no question about that. The question is whether disruptive acts of civil disobedience cause that to happen more quickly or more slowly.

Grazie Gemmato, resisti. E' questo l'editoriale Crucianiano. Parenzo non ne vuole parlare. Cruciani poi abbraccia il dottore Envolo di Fagnano Olona per il trattamento ricevuto e invita il Premier Meloni a ritirare la querela a Saviano. Stefano da Piacenza, invece, vuole querelarci per le frasi dette da Parenzo sulla Flottiglia XMas. Il dottor Trovarelli dice che Gesù Cristo è vicino al ritorno. Lo dice la Bibbia. Convinto lui, convinti tutti. Il Prof.Gianluca Grimalda di Scientist Rebellion è uno di quelli che si è incatenato a Linate contro i Jet Privati. Lui andrà in Papa Nuova Guinea, ma senza aereo. Comodo e veloce. Stefano da Lucca urla. Contro chi non prende posizione, pure suo padre. Alessandro Veschini, venditore di cimeli militari fascisti parla della vicenda Montesano. Decima Mas? Lui ha tutto. Parenzo? Un terrone.

durée : 00:58:22 - Cultures Monde - par : Julie Gacon - Des œuvres d'art aspergées de soupe, des blocages de route, des sabotages de trains... Les actions “coup de poing” de mouvements comme Extinction Rebellion, Just stop oil, Dernière génération ou Scientist Rebellion se multiplient sur le terrain et sur les réseaux, provoquant le débat. - invités : Manuel Cervera-Marzal Sociologue et chercheur à l'Université de Liège et chercheur associé à l'EHESS; Fanny Lajarthe Chercheuse au Socio-Environmental Dynamics Research Group de l'Université Libre de Bruxelles; Clémence Demay Chercheuse en droit

Charlie Gardner is a conservationist, activist and writer. An outspoken member of Scientist Rebellion, Charlie left academia last year to focus on raising the climate alarm through civil disobedience and science communication.Charlie joins me to discuss why scientists feel forced to choose activism. After decades of ignored data, warnings and suggestions, these same scientists who have been fighting to understand the crisis are taking to the streets to be heard.We discuss ecological systems, energy policy, corrupt politics, media, Extinction Rebellion, how to engage the public and how people can get involved in the face of disastrous inaction. Just this week, a new report on the state of climate action looked at 40 indicators of change and found not a single one is on track to keep the world from heating to the level at which world leaders promised to try to stop global warming.© Rachel Donald Get full access to Planet: Critical at www.planetcritical.com/subscribe

Wed, 02 Nov 2022 16:21:33 +0000 https://muenchenbriefing.podigee.io/701-neue-episode 7b24000cee0dcc354426c72908d47821 full Bier, Tischtennis und ein Totschlag in Neuperlach UND Wo in München die „Scientist Rebellion“ als nächstes zuschlagen könnte no Heiko Seeringer, Alexander Eisenreich, Christoph Kreisz

Slavery becomes freedom. Diplomacy becomes treason. Food stuffs become climate activism, again. And more!Commiserate on Discord: discord.gg/aDf4Yv9PrYSupport: patreon.com/heatdeathpodNever Forget: standwithdanielhale.orgGeneral RecommendationsJD's Recommendations: 1) Decision to Leave 2) Spy × FamilyJNM's Recommendations: 1) Broker 2) r/antiwork 3) r/ABoringDystopiaFurther Reading, Viewing, ListeningI Took an Amazon Warehouse Job to Cure My BurnoutTesla faces U.S. criminal probe over self-driving claimsRailroad workers want more time off, don't like agreementsParis Baguette Is Being Boycotted After a Factory Worker Was Found Crushed in a MachineMexico is ending daylight savings time, America should do the sameHaiti Isn't Asking for US Intervention30 House Democrats sent a letter to Biden urging him to seek peace talks to end the conflict in Ukraine. Less than 24 hours later, they retracted it under pressure. The letter, which called for the most basic diplomacy to avoid nuclear war, was met with extreme backlash and condemnation by their fellow Democrats:HOUSE PROGRESSIVES FLOAT DIPLOMATIC PATH TOWARD ENDING WAR IN UKRAINE, GET ANNIHILATED, QUICKLY “CLARIFY”Diplomacy Becomes Treason: Tepid Dissent on Ukraine Crushed in D.C. w/ Medea BenjaminInsane: Progressives WITHDRAW Letter Urging Diplomacy with RussiaThe War in Ukraine Could Lead to Nuclear War18 members of Scientist Rebellion are in custody overnight for the crime of speaking the truth to the public, of requesting governments to act upon Climate Failure.Why Are Climate Activists Throwing Food at Million-Dollar Paintings?Locationless Locationsheatdeathpod.comEvery show-related link is corralled and available here.Twitter: @heatdeathpodPlease send all Letters of Derision, Indifference, Inquiry, Mild Elation, et cetera to: heatdeathoftheuniversepodcast@gmail.com

My guest is Dr. Alexander Grevel, a German climate activist. He is a board member of Klimaliste, a new party in Germany that advocates for climate action to achieve the Paris Agreement goal of limiting warming to 1.5 degrees. Alexander holds a Bachelor of Science, a Master of Science and a PhD in Biology and he is an active supporter of the Last Generation and Scientist Rebellion - two climate protection movements that use civil disobedience to spur political negotiations on much needed climate action. On this episode, we talk to Alexander about how Klimaliste was founded and what their goal is. We learn about Alexander's experience as a scientist who is involved in the climate protection movement and what challenges the movement is facing in Germany. Support the podcast and our featured changemakers by rating and reviewing it on Apple Podcasts or on your favorite listening app. Thanks for your support! --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/meet-the-changemakers/message

Scientists have been warning about the dangers of climate change for decades, but with little success at convincing society to slow the rate of greenhouse gas emissions. Why? What is wrong with the conventional academic's theory of change, that providing information to key stakeholders will enable more effective climate policymaking? These questions have been central to Dr Charlie Gardner's career and development, and this conversation tracks his experiences moving from a leading Conservation Scientist in Madagascar working right on the frontier of biodiversity loss, through to being one of the leading figures in Scientist Rebellion. Edited by Aidan Knox.

As pandemic restrictions ease in many places, street protests are starting up again. But what happens when the public takes climate action into their own hands, from sticking themselves to diggers to bunking off school? Mass protests and demonstrations can be an effective way to gain media attention but do they lead to lasting change? Kate Lamble and Neal Razzell are joined by: Disha Ravi, climate activist, India Dan Hooper, (Swampy), climate activist, UK Mel, member of Scientist Rebellion, Mexico Dana R. Fisher, Professor of Sociology at the University of Maryland, USA Ruud Wouters, researcher Media, Movements & Politics, University of Antwerp, Belgium Contact us: theclimatequestion@bbc.com Team: Reporter: Imran Qureshi, India Producer: Lizzy McNeill Researcher: Natasha Fernandes Series Producer: Alex Lewis Production Co-ordinators: Helena Warwick-Cross, Siobhan Reed Sound engineer: Tom Brignall

Straßenblockaden verärgern Mitbürger, der Kanzler reagiert genervt und bei Demos bleiben die Leute weg. Gleichzeitig werden Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftler aktiv. Wie steht es aktuell um die Klimabewegung, darum geht es in dieser Gradmesser-Folge.

Supreme Court Limits EPA's Greenhouse Gas Regulating Ability This week, in its final round of opinions for the term, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Congress had not explicitly given the Environmental Protection Agency the power to regulate carbon dioxide emissions from power plants under the terms of the Clean Air Act.  “Capping carbon dioxide emissions at a level that will force a nationwide transition away from the use of coal to generate electricity may be a sensible ‘solution to the crisis of the day.' But it is not plausible that Congress gave EPA the authority to adopt on its own such a regulatory scheme in Section 111(d). A decision of such magnitude and consequence rests with Congress itself, or an agency acting pursuant to a clear delegation from that representative body,” wrote Chief Justice Roberts in the majority opinion in the case, West Virginia v. EPA.   The ruling could hinder efforts globally to combat climate change, and could also affect regulations issued by other federal agencies dealing with "major questions" that would dramatically affect the economy. Timothy Revell, deputy U.S. Editor at New Scientist, joins Ira to talk about the decision and other stories from the week in science, including new studies of the canine evolutionary tree, a look back at 10 years of the CRISPR gene-editing technique, the launch of the CAPSTONE mission, and what our nose can tell us about potential relationships.   The Scientist Rebellion: “We're Not Exaggerating” About The Climate Crisis Earlier this year, more than 1,000 scientists in 26 countries risked arrest during protests against climate change inaction. In Washington D.C., Rose Abramoff and other demonstrators chained themselves to the White House fence before being arrested. Across the country, Peter Kalmus chained himself to the doors of a JPMorgan Chase & Co. Bank in Los Angeles and gave an impassioned speech: “The scientists of the world are being ignored. And it's got to stop. We're going to lose everything. And we're not joking. We're not lying. We're not exaggerating.” Just recently, the Supreme Court recently cut the Environmental Protection Agency's power (EPA) to regulate carbon emissions, a major step back in the climate movement. Abramoff, a global change ecologist based in Knoxville, Tennessee, and Kalmus, a climate scientist at NASA's Jet Propulsion Lab based in Los Angeles, California, are members of an international group of scientists called Scientist Rebellion, who committed to sounding the alarms about the climate crisis. They join Ira to talk about the state of the climate movement, what it's like to be a climate activist in the United States, and the power of disruption.   Drought In Western Kansas Exacerbates Global Wheat Shortage Russia's war in Ukraine has disrupted global food supplies, driving up demand and prices for wheat. But after months of drought, many western Kansas farmers won't have a crop to sell. This time of year, the wheat growing in this part of western Kansas should be thigh-high and lush green.But as a months-long drought continues to parch the region, many fields tell a different story. “There's nothing out there. It's dead,” farmer Vance Ehmke said, surveying a wheat field near his land in Lane County. “It's just ankle-high straw.” Across western Kansas, many fields planted with wheat months ago now look like barren wastelands. The gaping spaces between rows of brown, shriveled plants reveal hardened dirt that's scarred with deep cracks from baking in the sun. Of all the years for drought to hit western Kansas wheat farmers, it couldn't have come at a worse time. Even with wheat selling for near-record-high prices as the war in Ukraine disrupts the world's food supplies, a lot of farmers in western Kansas won't have any to sell. And those who made it through the drought with enough crop to harvest will likely end up with far fewer bushels than they had last year, a downturn that limits the state's ability to help ease the global food crisis. Read the rest at sciencefriday.com.   See Science In Motion At “Twitch, Pop, Bloom” It's not unusual for people to crowd into a theater to see a big blockbuster about science. But when's the last time you saw people clamoring for seats for an educational film made by scientists? The answer is likely never. But this was not unusual in the early 1900s, when film was an up-and-coming medium and science was capturing the public's imagination. This summer, the Museum of the Moving Image (MOMI) in Queens, New York, is highlighting science education films of the past in the new exhibit “Twitch, Pop, Bloom: Science in Action.” SciFri producer Kathleen Davis speaks to Sonia Epstein, MOMI's associate curator of science and film, about how these early videos and research went hand-in-hand at the dawn of cinema, and the historical significance of some of the videos in the exhibit.   Transcripts for each segment will be available the week after the show airs on sciencefriday.com.

Gaslit Nation podcast co-host Sarah Kendzior : Will Jan. 6 House Investigation Lead to Accountability for Trump and Coup Co-Conspirators?Scientist Rebellion ecologist Malik Morrison: Environmental Scientist Joins Campaign to Stop Mountain Valley Fracked Gas PipelinePoor People's Campaign Co-Chair Rev. Dr. Liz Theoharis: June 18th March on Washington Demands Action on Rising U.S. PovertyBob Nixon's Under-reported News SummaryNonviolent independent Kashmir activist sentenced to life in prisonDoes inflation or abortion matter more in swing statesTrailer park residents take on venture capitalists

* Will Jan 6th House Investigation Lead to Accountability for Trump and Coup Co-Conspirators?; Sarah Kendzior author and co-host of the Gaslit Nation weekly podcast; Producer: Scott Harris. * Scientist Rebellion Fights Mountain Valley Fracked Gas Pipeline; Malik Morrison, a young wetlands ecologist and member of Scientist Rebellion; Producer: Melinda Tuhus. * June 18th March on Washington Demands Action to Address Rising US Poverty; Liz Theoharis, Reverend, Co-Chair of the Poor People's Campaign; Producer: Scott Harris.

Gaslit Nation podcast co-host Sarah Kendzior: Will Jan. 6 House Investigation Lead to Accountability for Trump and Coup Co-Conspirators?Scientist Rebellion ecologist Malik Morrison: Environmental Scientist Joins Campaign to Stop Mountain Valley Fracked Gas PipelinePoor People's Campaign Co-Chair Rev. Dr. Liz Theoharis: June 18th March on Washington Demands Action on Rising U.S. PovertyBob Nixon's Under-reported News SummaryNonviolent independent Kashmir activist sentenced to life in prisonDoes inflation or abortion matter more in swing statesTrailer park residents take on venture capitalists

In this episode of the podcast, we reflect back on the year that has passed since we started making this podcast. What happened in the green lab landscape this past year? What changed in our professional lives? What are our reflections on the podcast, and which are our personal favorite episodes so far?! Join us on our mission towards more sustainable research as we discuss obstacles and solutions, talk to other caring scientists, and try to figure out how to make scientific research more sustainable. One thing is certain: Mission Sustainable isn't a Mission Impossible! Your hosts are: Adriana Wolf Perez, Ph.D., working as a program manager at the University of Cambridge, UK Nikoline Borgermann, Ph.D., working as an independent green lab consultant at Ava Sustain and a sustainable labs advisor at the University of Copenhagen, Denmark ... and both are passionate about the planet and people! Reach out if you have questions or comments! podcast@avasustain.com Useful links related to this episode: SELs - a new European green lab network: https://www.sels-network.org/ Scientist Rebellion: https://scientistrebellion.com/ Episode on The Thoughtful Travel Campaign Episode on the climate impact of computational science Episode on starting a national green lab network Twitter: @caringscientist Instagram: @thecaringscientist Nikoline's website: www.avasustain.com You can find Nikoline's social media accounts under @avasustain (Twitter, LinkedIn, Instagram) Special thanks to: Joana Duro Fernandes (Podcast Cover) Laurie Pattison (Music)

The year is 2250, and the participation of humanity in the global ecosystem is shaped by a council of scientists contemplating, with considerable reverence and humility, the various paths before us. How did we get here from the exceptionally stupid place we are in now? In this series, we will examine the relationship of science to power--this time, we'll examine the ideological discipline that prevented climate and ecological scientists from speaking up and acting out sooner, and the rupture of that discipline as our crisis deepens. Our guide to that discipline will be the brilliant book Disciplined Minds: A Critical Look at Salaried Professionals and the Soul-Battering System that Shapes Their Lives by physicist Jeff Schmidt. We'll examine the ways that professional training of all varieties, including in the physical sciences, is ideological, requiring a narrowing of focus and a willingness to perform alienated labor in hierarchies; how science needs a revolution reintegrating the observer and the observed; and how ultimately the civil resistance model being employed by groups like Scientist Rebellion cannot withstand scrutiny: a scientific description of the nature of the current power structure has yet to be articulated. 

With the troubling content of the latest IPCC report leaked to the world, we talk with environmental scientist Malik Morrison about the new movements to bring much needed attention to the challenge climate changes poses. Learn more about Scientist Rebellion on their website! Check out Malik's YouTube channel, Ecotainment!

Wednesday Breakfast with Claudia and Jacob // 7.10AM: Lurion De Mello from Macquarie Business School spoke with Evan Wallace about the international energy crisis and the risk that fuel shortages and surging fossil fuel prices present to decarbonising efforts. // 7:18AM: Loy Yang coal industry worker Tony Wolfe advocates for the transition to renewables speaking at last week's Workers for Climate Action event. // 7.35AM: Voyteck Michael Bereza from Scientist Rebellion spoke with Jacob about climate misinformation, the climate crisis, and the organisation. // 7.55AM: Kristin O'Connell from the Antipoverty Centre spoke with Claudia about welfare, housing affordability, and the cycle of poverty. Details of their event tonight 'The politician's role in dismantling the poverty machine' can be found here. // 8.15AM: Artemis Muñoz spoke with Jacob about their upcoming play Artemis: Utter Mess happening at La Mama Theatre May 17-22. Artemis: Utter Mess explores labels and the difference between the words that confine us and the words that set us free. Tickets available here. //  Songs:Jive Baby on a Saturday Night, The JelliesLittle Sunflower, Dorothy AshbyPay the Rent, La Battue

durée : 00:04:15 - Social Lab - par : Valère Corréard - Ils ont rejoint un mouvement international né à Glasgow lors de la COP 26 : « Scientist Rebellion ». Ce mouvement s'est récemment installé en France avec des groupes locaux dans plusieurs régions.

durée : 00:04:15 - Social Lab - par : Valère Corréard - Ils ont rejoint un mouvement international né à Glasgow lors de la COP 26 : « Scientist Rebellion ». Ce mouvement s'est récemment installé en France avec des groupes locaux dans plusieurs régions.

Thanks to Steph's keen attention to the news, we become aware of the recent Scientist Rebellion which protests against corporations observed to be major contributors to climate change. The incident got us questioning, how should we react? What can we do about climate change? How do non-scientists fit into this dynamic? --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app

Mehr als 440 Tote, Zehntausende obdachlos: Die Flutkatastrophe in Südafrika ist grauenhaft. Die Klima- und Außenpolitik-Expertin der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Auswärtige Politik, Kira Vinke, erklärt, wie es zu dieser Katastrophe kommen konnte und kritisiert, dass solche Desaster hierzulande als fast normal wahrgenommen werden. Bayerns Ministerpräsident Söder will die umstrittene und umweltgefährdende Erdgasgewinnung Fracking „ergebnisoffen prüfen“. Luisa Neubauer von Fridays for Future erinnert sich beim Thema Fracking an frühe Jugend Debattiert-Wettbewerbe und durchleuchtet diese Nebelkerze von Söder. Am Ostersonntag wurden bei Klima-Protesten in London mehrere Wissenschaftler:innen von „Scientist Rebellion“ festgenommen. Zuvor hatten sich NASA-Wissenschaftler:innen in Los Angeles aus Protest angekettet. In Berlin blockierten Klima-Expert:innen im Regierungsviertel eine Brücke. Ob die Proteste eine neue Qualität erreichen, fragt Unternehmer und Politik-Berater David Wortmann. Abonniert uns ab sofort für eine wöchentliche Einordnung der wichtigsten Ereignisse in Politik und Wirtschaft und ihre Auswirkungen auf die Klimakrise. Über Euer Feedback und Themenvorschläge freuen wir uns unter PODSTEHUNSBEI@studio-bummens.de

Da questa puntata inizio con una struttura meglio definita delle puntate di Che clima fa che saranno organizzate in quattro storie a puntata:Copertina: la protesta dei Scientist Rebellion dal 4 al 9 aprile.Che clima fa: l'inondazione a Durban in Sud AfricaItalia: gli accordi del gas con l'AlgeriaTech: il nuovo aggeggio di Dyson sarà in vendita dall'autunno.Le fonti e i link per approfondire gli argomenti di questo podcast:https://www.instagram.com/scientistrebellion/?hl=en https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/apr/06/climate-scientists-are-desperate-were-crying-begging-and-getting-arrested https://www.nytimes.com/2022/04/12/world/africa/floods-mudslides-south-africa.html https://www.linkiesta.it/2022/04/gas-italia-algeria-russia-energia/ https://www.linkiesta.it/2022/04/russia-ucraina-gas-energia/ https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/politics/europes-other-problem-algeria https://twitter.com/ira_joseph/status/1513546089143676930https://www.repubblica.it/tecnologia/2022/03/30/news/lultima_invenzione_di_dyson_le_cuffie_che_purificano_laria-343339614/La pagina di Che clima fa su LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/19026854

La neurocientífica y Catedrática en Fisiología, Raquel Martín, se ha asomado a La Ventana para hablar de lo que nos ocurre cuando damos besos. Miguel Ángel Campos nos cuenta las últimas novedades del caso de la estafa de las mascarillas. Hablamos de inflación con Santiago Niño Becerra. Y conocemos el movimiento Scientist Rebellion con Fernando Valladares. Investigador del CSIC y profesor de ecología en la Universidad Rey Juan Carlos

Full Episode 4-11-22 - In this episode, we do our weekly Netflix roundup, we discuss the epic badassery of Scientist Rebellion, and Sparkle teaches us art. 

Afrontando la crisis climática y ecológica

"Das Klima”, der Podcast zur Wissenschaft hinter der Krise. Wir lesen den aktuellen Bericht des Weltklimarats und erklären den aktuellen Stand der Klimaforschung. In Folge 31 vertreiben wir uns noch ein letztes Mal die Wartezeit bevor es mit Teil II des 6. Sachstandsberichts losgeht. Claudia erklärt, wie man sich an der Arbeit des IPCC beteiligen kann und wir rätseln, was ein “IPCC Outreach Event” ist. Florian stellt die Arbeit von Eunice Newton Foote vor, die im 19. Jahrhundert als erste wissenschaftlich beschrieb, wie CO2 die Erdatmosphäre erwärmt. Und am Ende diskutieren wir darüber, was wir davon halten, dass “Scientist Rebellion” einen Teil des Sachstandsberichts geleakt hat.

Kyle Topfer is back for part 2 to continue where we left our conversion on the state of the climate in part 1. To refresh you, Kyle is an Environmental Scientist & and member/activist of Scientist Rebellion. Scientist Rebellion, sister organization to Extinction Rebellion, are the group responsible for the recent earth-shaking leak of Part 3 of the upcoming Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Sixth Assessment report. You can find more about Kyle and Scientist Rebellion on Kyle's Linkdin and Scientist Rebellion's Official Website, Youtube, Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram. Show Notes:Judge issues protest warning as Paralympian jailed for plane stunt | The GuardianUK climate protesters face tougher penalties for blocking roads | ReutersLawyer who sued Chevron sentenced to six months in contempt case | ReutersThe 10 Most Important Crops In The World | Business InsiderWhy Are Haitian Migrants Gathering at the U.S. Border? | Council on Foreign RelationsThe Silicon Valley wealthy have become super doomsday preppers by buying remote New Zealand properties, getting eye surgeries, and stockpiling ammo and food | Business InsiderWindshield Phenomenon | WikipediaA giant insect ecosystem is collapsing due to humans. It's a catastrophe | The GuardianInvasive species in Australia | Australian Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment Undaunted Courage: Meriwether Lewis, Thomas Jefferson, and the Opening of the American West by Stephen Ambrose | AmazonIs The Secret To A Healthier Microbiome Hidden In The Hadza Diet? | NPRLynx | WikipediaClimate tipping points — too risky to bet against | NatureA Major Ocean Current May Be Hurtling Towards Collapse | Gizmodo

Today we are joined by Kyle Topfer. Kyle is an Environmental Scientist & and member/activist of Scientist Rebellion. Scientist Rebellion, sister organization to Extinction Rebellion, are the group responsible for the recent earth-shaking leak of Part 3 of the upcoming Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Sixth Assessment report. With so much vital information to cover, this will be a RMP Special 2 part episode. You can find more about Kyle and Scientist Rebellion on Kyle's Linkdin and Scientist Rebellion's Official Website, Youtube, Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram. As a quick note, be sure to subscribe to our new Youtube! We will be posting our weekly episodes there as well in video format. Check back in weekly for a new visualizer episode! And who knows? Maybe there might be some video episodes coming too ;)Show Notes:Scientist Rebellion | Official WebsiteExtinction Rebellion | Official WebsiteIntergovernmental Panel on Climate Change | Official WebsiteIPCC Sixth Assessment Report. Part III Leak| Full Document Why Milankovitch (Orbital) Cycles Can't Explain Earth's Current Warming | NASA Jet Propulsion LaboratoryVenus was once more Earth-like, but climate change made it uninhabitable | The ConversationThe US military is a bigger polluter than more than 100 countries combined | QuartzEnvironmental impacts of hydropower | EnergrySageBreeder Reactor | Encyclopedia BritannicaSir David King (Chemist) | WikipediaOSU Divest to meet with foundation | Corvallis Gazette TimesNo, Oregon State University Did Not Divest | Divestment Facts

Are we really ready for what is coming, Hunter S. Thompson a week after 9/11, Yale study - climate change in the American mind, this summer was hotter than the Dust Bowl summer, & leaked IPCC report. Written by Hunter S. Thompson a week after 9/11 - "We are At War now, according to President Bush, and I take him at his word. He also says this War might last for "a very long time." Generals and military scholars will tell you that eight or 10 years is actually not such a long time in the span of human history -- which is no doubt true -- but history also tells us that 10 years of martial law and a war-time economy are going to feel like a Lifetime to people who are in their twenties today. The poor bastards of what will forever be known as Generation Z are doomed to be the first generation of Americans who will grow up with a lower standard of living than their parents enjoyed. That is extremely heavy news, and it will take a while for it to sink in. The 22 babies born in New York City while the World Trade Center burned will never know what they missed. The last half of the 20th century will seem like a wild party for rich kids, compared to what's coming now. The party's over, folks." Yale study - climate change in the American mind - source "46% of Americans still believe climate change is "natural" or "not happening." 25% are worried about it. A mere 15% think they will be harmed from the fallout, and just 10% have put any real effort into changing their lifestyle. 63% of people have made no lifestyle changes since 2008." This summer was hotter than the Dust Bowl summer, NOAA says - source "The period from June through August this year was the hottest on record in the United States, exceeding even the Dust Bowl summer of 1936, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration said on Thursday." "We leaked the upcoming IPCC report!" - Scientist Rebellion - source "We have leaked part III of the upcoming IPCC report. There's no time to wait around, there's no time for continued inaction – the people deserve to know NOW what our corporate owned politicians have done to them. The greatest crime ever has already been carried out – the perpetrators are still at liberty, but the victims are starting to pile up. We leaked the report because governments – pressured and bribed by fossil fuel and other industries, protecting their failed ideology and avoiding accountability – have edited the conclusions before official reports were released in the past. We leaked it to show that scientists are willing to disobey and take personal risk to inform the public. We plead with people to go into serious nonviolent resistance. To join us in the streets to apply unbearable pressure on this genocidal system – to take it down before it takes us all down with it." What's happening in America and are we ready for what is coming?- my little rant Produced by The Wild 1 Media. Check out our other podcasts- https://darksidediaries.sounder.fm https://anchor.fm/ttmygh https://crypto101.sounder.fm/