Podcasts about Jeffrey Epstein

Today on Mea Culpa, I'm joined by Marcus Flowers, Army veteran, former congressional candidate, and outspoken defender of democracy, for a no-holds-barred conversation on the stakes in 2025. We dig into Trump's escalating authoritarianism, the GOP's abandonment of democratic norms, and how MAGA's culture wars are fueling division across the country. Flowers shares his take on the renewed focus on Jeffrey Epstein, Trump's upcoming meeting with Putin, and the controversy surrounding the BLS. We also unpack Trump's push to take over the D.C. police force, contrasting his heavy-handed tactics with the values service members swear to uphold. From ICE roundups to global instability, this episode is a call to stand up, speak out, and fight back before it's too late. Thanks to our sponsor: L-Nutra: Just visit https://ProlonLife.com/MEACULPA to claim your 15% discount and your bonus gift. Subscribe to Michael's Substack: https://therealmichaelcohen.substack.com/ Subscribe to Michael's YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@TheMichaelCohenShow Join us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/PoliticalBeatdown Add the Mea Culpa podcast feed: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/mea-culpa-with-michael-cohen Add the Political Beatdown podcast feed: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/political-beatdown Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Bill Gates has consistently framed his association with Jeffrey Epstein as a “huge mistake,” claiming he naively believed the convicted sex offender could help advance global health philanthropy—an aspiration that never materialized. In interviews with The Wall Street Journal, Gates described his behavior as “foolish,” emphasized that he had no personal or business relationship with Epstein, and cut off contact by 2014. He lamented granting Epstein credibility by being seen with him, calling it one of the worst judgment calls of his life.Yet critics remain unconvinced. The repeated denial of substance—despite documented visits to Epstein's Manhattan townhouse, including one with his wife—smacks of damage control, not candor. The aftermath of the revelation played a key role in his divorce, and even public figures like Elon Musk have ridiculed Gates's moral credibility, saying he wouldn't trust him to babysit his own children. Gates's repeated invocation of “mistake” now feels like a defensive script designed to deflect deeper scrutiny rather than a genuine reckoningto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:New photo shows Bill Gates posing with Epstein accuser years after his 2008 conviction: report (nypost.com)

As the lawsuit between the Epstein survivors and the USVI continues to take shape, we are getting a few hints about which way things are headed, especially considering that the USVI and their motion to dismiss has been denied, and they have now been hit with a second amended complaint.   Not only that, but they've been ordered by the Judge to respond.  In this episode, we take a trip back down to the USVI to get an update on the latest back and forth and to see where things currently stand with the lawsuit. to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Amended Complaint Alleges V.I. Officials Conspired with Epstein for Financial Gain | St. Thomas Source (stthomassource.com)

In the wake of revelations that Harvard accepted over $9 million from Jeffrey Epstein before his 2008 conviction—and even allowed him frequent access and an office on campus—students and alumni responded with justified outrage. The university's half-measures, like funneling $200,000 in unspent Epstein funds into trafficking-victim charities, felt more like reputational polishing than real reckoning. Epstein's persistent presence within Harvard's academic spaces—including visits from 2010 to 2018—highlighted a culture that prioritized prestige and funding over ethics. Disgusted alumni began calling out the institution's moral failures, demanding accountability instead of quiet internal reviews.The Epstein scandal shattered the illusion that elite institutions operate above reproach, prompting fierce criticism from inside Harvard's own ranks. Students and faculty, who already questioned the university's donor vetting and governance, used Epstein as emblematic of a broken system—one where donors wield undue influence and internal safeguards are reactive at best. Many alumni, alarmed by the optics and ongoing resistance to reform, lamented how “too big to fail” universities become complicit through silence—and now, through calculated distancing.To contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2020/5/13/hks-dubin-fellows-wexner-ties/

If you've been asking Pablo to discuss Jeffrey Epstein… this episode is for you. The NFLPA's election of a new executive director, David White, has brought a new level of spin, and denial, about a major scandal — and cover-up — during his tenure atop SAG-AFTRA. So PTFO summons Pro Football Talk's Mike Florio back for a fourth (!) installment of their endless NFL investigation. And with the help of a brave new character, we attempt to do what this union only says they did: tell the truth about the leadership they chose. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Have you ever wondered what the inside of Jeffrey Epstein's New York brownstone looked like? Well have no fear! The photos have been leaked and we are going through and analyzing each and every detail. Plus, cursed labubus and banned baby names!

If you've been asking Pablo to discuss Jeffrey Epstein… this episode is for you. The NFLPA's election of a new executive director, David White, has brought a new level of spin, and denial, about a major scandal — and cover-up — during his tenure atop SAG-AFTRA. So PTFO summons Pro Football Talk's Mike Florio back for a fourth (!) installment of their endless NFL investigation. And with the help of a brave new character, we attempt to do what this union only says they did: tell the truth about the leadership they chose. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Prince Andrew's ties to Jeffrey Epstein run far deeper than most people realise — and bestselling royal biographer Andrew Lownie joins me to reveal new evidence, shocking witness testimony, and disturbing details the Palace would rather you never heard. From claims Andrew visited Epstein's private island, to reports of 40 prostitutes sent to him on one trip, to the bizarre alleged rivalry with Epstein over women, this interview exposes the murky world of royalty, sex, and power. Sponsor: Make your AI video here: https://invideo.io/i/andrewgold Follow Andrew Lownie: https://andrewlownie.me/media UK: Buy Entitled!: https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/0008775451 Other countries: Link at bottom We discuss: Did Prince Andrew order Virginia Giuffre “from a catalogue”? Why Bill Clinton's name keeps coming up in Epstein investigations The surprising celebrities linked to Epstein — from Donald Trump to Stephen Hawking Whether the Royal Family protected Andrew from justice How Ghislaine Maxwell fits into the picture The mysterious deaths and threats surrounding this story And what really happened the night Jeffrey Epstein died Andrew Lownie, author of Traitor King and The Duke of York: The Turbulent Life of Prince Andrew, has spent years digging into the Prince's scandals — and in this no-holds-barred conversation, he pulls no punches. This is Heretics — where we ask the questions others won't. #epstein #trump #hereticspodcast Chapters: 0:00 Prince Andrew & Epstein Highlights 1:20 Entitled: Andrew, Sarah & Jeffrey Epstein 2:35 Andrew's Sex Rivalry With Epstein 4:50 The Evidence That Andrew Was On The Island 5:35 Bill Clinton's Name Came Up A Lot 8:20 Have The Royals Protected Andrew? 11:50 40 Prostitutes Sent To Andrew On His Trip! 12:50 Fight With Prince Harry 15:05 Is Andrew Lownie Scared For His Life? 17:20 Andrew & Epstein ‘Shared' Women 19:20 Andrew Ordered Virginia FROM A CATALOGUE 21:35 Ghislaine Maxwell & Trump Will Be Let Off 24:50 Was Andrew Involved in the Logistics 27:05 The Most Damning Thing About Andrew - Epstein 28:35 Trump & Andrew 31:20 Stephen Hawking Was On the List 32:20 What Really Happened to Epstein? 35:10 How the Palace Suppress Epstein - Andrew Ties 37:20 Jacob Rees-Mogg's FIGHT With Andrew Lownie 40:45 How Emily Maitlis STOLE The Andrew Interview 42:20 Clinton, Andrew & Epstein 45:20 Jimmy Savile, & Andrew's Harvey Weinstein Friendship 47:05 Sarah Ferguson Even CLOSER With Epstein 48:50 Why Doesn't Andrew Volunteer Information? 53:05 A Heretic Andrew Lownie Admires Buy the book: US: https://www.amazon.com/Entitled-Rise-... Australia: https://www.amazon.com.au/dp/B0F49YZ9QD Canada: https://www.amazon.ca/dp/B0FHKYTWF2 Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Lionel discusses various topics, beginning with a legal analysis of Melania Trump's potential lawsuit against Hunter Biden for defamation, specifically regarding claims about her introduction to Donald Trump through Jeffrey Epstein. Lionel explains the legal standards for defamation involving public figures, like proving malice. Lionel then goes into a detailed explanation of "chronophilia," defining various "philias" related to age-based attractions and distinguishing between attraction, which is a thought, and acting upon those attractions, which constitutes a crime.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Gov.  Gavin Newsom (D-CA) announces his state will redraw Congressional district lines with the express purpose of Democrats gaining five U.S. House seats to offset what is happening in Texas where republicans are trying to pass a new map to net five seats for their party.  Gov. Newsom calls it "liberation day for California"; President Donald Trump claims that the official crime data for Washington, DC is fake, and that crime in the nation's capital is the “worst it's ever been”,  as his deployment of federal law enforcement and National Guard troops is ramping up; President Trump signs a proclamation on this 90th anniversary of the creation of Social Security, saying his administration is protecting and strengthening those programs. Democrats say that is not true; Wholesale inflation comes in unexpectedly hot in July; President Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin on their meeting tomorrow in Anchorage, Alaska on the war in Ukraine; Israel announces a major expansion of settlements in the West Bank; Hunter Biden says he will not apologize for saying the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein introduced First Lady Melania Trump to President Trump, after Melania Trump threatens to sue for $1 billion in damages. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Today's show is sponsored by: Firecracker Farms Everything's better with HOT SALT. Firecracker Farms hot salt is hand crafted on their family farm with Carolina Reaper, Ghost and Trinidad Scorpion peppers. This is a balanced, deep flavor pairs perfect with your favorite foods. Whether it's eggs, steaks veggies or even your favorite beverage, Firecracker Farms hot salt is what you've been missing. Just head to https://firecracker.farm/ use code word: SEAN for a discount. Unlock the flavor in your food now! Delta Rescue Delta Rescue is one the largest no-kill animal sanctuaries. Leo Grillo is on a mission to help all abandoned, malnourished, hurt or suffering animals. He relies solely on contributions from people like you and me. If you want to help Leo to continue his mission of running one of the best care-for-life animal sanctuaries in the country please visit Delta Rescue at: https://deltarescue.org/ John Solomon bombshell drops, as the FBI found legitamite reason to investigate Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation, then Obama Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates told them to "shut it down!" The Clinton Foundation solicited hundreds of millions of dollars from foreign and U.S. interests while she was serving as Secretary of State. First Lady Melania threatens to sue Hunter Biden for $1 billion over claiming Jeffrey Epstein introduced her to President Trump. This sparked a brazen, defiant response from Hunter in an interview with Andrew Callaghan on Channel 5. Melania won her suit against the Daily Mail so I hope Hunter has been selling some paintings. President Trump was at the Kennedy Center last night to name is 2025 honorees. It was another display in taking back the culture from the Left. We will celebrate America, American culture, patriotism and have beautiful buildings and landmarks. A stark contrast from the $1 billion eyesore Obama just plopped down on the south side of Chicago. The meeting with Putin takes place tomorrow with Steve Witkoff and President Trump as they seek to broker a peace deal between Russia and Ukraine. Our panel is here to unpack it all, plus this week's winners and losers. Featuring: Steve Cortes Founder | League of American Workers https://www.amworkers.com/ Sara Gonzales Sara Gonzales Unfiltered | Blaze TV https://www.blazetv.com/series/0i0zVH9dit5S-sara-gonzales-unfiltered?channel=series David Strom Assistant Editor | Hot Air https://hotair.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------- 1️⃣ Subscribe and ring the bell for new videos: https://youtube.com/seanmspicer?sub_confirmation=1 2️⃣ Become a part of The Sean Spicer Show community: https://www.seanspicer.com/ 3️⃣ Listen to the full audio show on all platforms: Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-sean-spicer-show/id1701280578 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/32od2cKHBAjhMBd9XntcUd iHeart: https://www.iheart.com/podcast/269-the-sean-spicer-show-120471641/ 4️⃣ Stay in touch with Sean on social media: Facebook: https://facebook.com/seanmspicer Twitter: https://twitter.com/seanspicer Instagram: https://instagram.com/seanmspicer/ 5️⃣ Follow The Sean Spicer Show on social media: Facebook: https://facebook.com/seanspicershow Twitter: https://twitter.com/seanspicershow Instagram: https://instagram.com/seanspicershow Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Leaked correspondence between Jes Staley—former CEO of Barclays and long-time JPMorgan executive—and Jeffrey Epstein laid bare more than just casual business exchanges; they revealed a troubling bond rooted in intimacy, trust, and privilege. In one exchange, Staley mused, “That was fun. Say hi to Snow White,” to which Epstein replied, “What character would you like next?” Staley coyly responded, “Beauty and the Beast,” turning their relationship into a grotesque pantomime. More damningly, Staley described Epstein as “family” and spoke of a “profound” connection, while photos of young women were also swapped—all under the guise of everyday correspondence. Far from distancing himself, Staley sustained contact well past Epstein's 2008 conviction, even joining him on his private island in 2009—behavior that defied any claim of a “purely professional” relationship.The fallout was swift—and deserved. The UK's Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) concluded that Staley “recklessly misled” both Barclays and regulators by downplaying the closeness of his ties with Epstein. A £1.8 million fine (later reduced to £1.1 million) and a lifetime ban from senior financial roles followed. The Upper Tribunal upheld the sanctions, emphasizing that Staley knowingly took a calculated risk, hoping the truth would stay buried. But the emails, held up like digital incriminators, ensured his downfall. His denials, evasive demeanor in court, and attempt to frame the relationship as innocuous only magnified the breach of trust. In financial leadership, reputation is everything—and Staley burned his.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Epstein-Staley Emails Reveal Friendship Forged at JPMorgan (yahoo.com)

In Case No. 1:23-cv-06418, defendant Leon Black filed a memorandum supporting his motion for sanctions against Wigdor LLP and attorney Jeanne Christensen. Black contends that the plaintiff's legal team pursued baseless claims, lacking factual and legal merit, with the intent to damage his reputation and coerce a settlement. He argues that their actions constitute an abuse of the judicial process, warranting sanctions to deter such conduct and uphold the integrity of the court.Black's memorandum details instances where he believes Wigdor LLP and Christensen failed to conduct adequate investigations before filing the lawsuit, resulting in frivolous and defamatory allegations. He asserts that their behavior violates professional conduct standards and has caused him significant harm. Consequently, Black requests that the court impose appropriate sanctions, including financial penalties and disciplinary measures, to prevent similar misconduct in the future.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.602764.54.0.pdf

Ghislaine Maxwell filed a formal motion in January 2024 seeking sanctions under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 37(b) and 37(c), arguing that Virginia Giuffre had failed to comply with both a court-ordered discovery directive and Rule 26(a) disclosure requirements. Maxwell's team, led by attorney Laura Menninger, detailed repeated instances in which Giuffre withheld or failed to fully disclose critical medical records and the identities of treating health providers—information essential to assessing her claims for emotional and physical distress. They characterized these omissions as intentional and willful, highlighting Giuffre's failure to identify providers like Dr. Lightfoot in Australia, among others, despite clear court orders and confirmations made during an April 21, 2016 hearing.Maxwell contended these violations had prejudiced her defense and undermined the integrity of the discovery process—arguing that lesser sanctions would be insufficient. Her motion sought a range of potential consequences under Rule 37(b), such as preclusion of Giuffre's damages claims or striking portions of her case, as well as cost-shifting remedies available under Rule 37(c), including attorney's fees and possibly an adverse inference against Giuffre. The motion emphasized that Giuffre and her counsel were well aware of the consequences of non-compliance and that her continued delays and omissions should trigger serious sanctions.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:epstein-documents-943-pages - DocumentCloud

Jeffrey Epstein's interest in transhumanism went far beyond idle curiosity—he saw it as a personal blueprint for shaping humanity's future in his own image. Using his foundation and wealth, he funded research in genetics, neuroscience, AI, and evolutionary dynamics, forging ties with elite scientists and institutions. Publicly, this philanthropy framed him as a visionary; privately, it aligned with deeply narcissistic goals such as creating a genetically engineered bloodline via his “baby ranch” plan, preserving his brain and body through cryonics, and potentially merging his consciousness with advanced technology. These ambitions stripped transhumanism of its egalitarian ideals, twisting it into a vehicle for personal immortality, hereditary control, and dominance over human evolution.The scientific community's willingness to accept his money—despite his criminal history—allowed Epstein to launder both his reputation and his dystopian ideas. Exclusive conferences, research grants, and one-on-one engagements gave him influence in shaping discourse on the future of humanity. His involvement underscores how speculative, high-stakes technologies can be exploited by the wealthy to entrench inequality and impose self-serving visions. Though Epstein's death halted his plans, the infrastructure, relationships, and normalization of ethically perilous ideas he helped foster remain. His story stands as a cautionary tale: without strong ethical guardrails, the power to reshape life itself can slip into the hands of those driven not by the betterment of all, but by vanity, exploitation, and the desire to control the human future.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Leaked correspondence between Jes Staley—former CEO of Barclays and long-time JPMorgan executive—and Jeffrey Epstein laid bare more than just casual business exchanges; they revealed a troubling bond rooted in intimacy, trust, and privilege. In one exchange, Staley mused, “That was fun. Say hi to Snow White,” to which Epstein replied, “What character would you like next?” Staley coyly responded, “Beauty and the Beast,” turning their relationship into a grotesque pantomime. More damningly, Staley described Epstein as “family” and spoke of a “profound” connection, while photos of young women were also swapped—all under the guise of everyday correspondence. Far from distancing himself, Staley sustained contact well past Epstein's 2008 conviction, even joining him on his private island in 2009—behavior that defied any claim of a “purely professional” relationship.The fallout was swift—and deserved. The UK's Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) concluded that Staley “recklessly misled” both Barclays and regulators by downplaying the closeness of his ties with Epstein. A £1.8 million fine (later reduced to £1.1 million) and a lifetime ban from senior financial roles followed. The Upper Tribunal upheld the sanctions, emphasizing that Staley knowingly took a calculated risk, hoping the truth would stay buried. But the emails, held up like digital incriminators, ensured his downfall. His denials, evasive demeanor in court, and attempt to frame the relationship as innocuous only magnified the breach of trust. In financial leadership, reputation is everything—and Staley burned his.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Epstein-Staley Emails Reveal Friendship Forged at JPMorgan (yahoo.com)

The federal government's prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein was deliberately narrow, avoiding the use of RICO laws that could have exposed the full scope of his decades-long trafficking network and implicated powerful political, financial, and intelligence figures. Instead of treating the case like an organized crime operation, they focused on a small set of charges tied to a limited timeframe, ensuring the investigation stayed contained. RICO would have allowed prosecutors to seize assets, subpoena extensive records, and charge a broader circle of co-conspirators, but its omission kept damaging evidence sealed, high-profile names off the record, and the investigation safely within boundaries designed to prevent collateral fallout.This wasn't a mistake—it was a controlled demolition. Epstein's death, Maxwell's limited charges, and the selective handling of evidence ensured the network behind them remained intact. The courtroom became the real crime scene, where the scope was cut, witnesses were muted, and the public was fed a sanitized version of events. The outcome wasn't a reckoning but a strategic pause, a way to tidy up before returning to business as usual. In the end, justice wasn't served; the system protected itself, showing once again that the law is enforced where it's convenient, and shielded where it's dangerous.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

In Case No. 1:23-cv-06418, defendant Leon Black filed a memorandum supporting his motion for sanctions against Wigdor LLP and attorney Jeanne Christensen. Black contends that the plaintiff's legal team pursued baseless claims, lacking factual and legal merit, with the intent to damage his reputation and coerce a settlement. He argues that their actions constitute an abuse of the judicial process, warranting sanctions to deter such conduct and uphold the integrity of the court.Black's memorandum details instances where he believes Wigdor LLP and Christensen failed to conduct adequate investigations before filing the lawsuit, resulting in frivolous and defamatory allegations. He asserts that their behavior violates professional conduct standards and has caused him significant harm. Consequently, Black requests that the court impose appropriate sanctions, including financial penalties and disciplinary measures, to prevent similar misconduct in the future.(commercial at 7:46)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.602764.54.0.pdf

Courtney Wild, one of Jeffrey Epstein's underage victims, has waged a prolonged legal battle asserting that federal prosecutors violated her statutory rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act by secretly crafting a 2007 non-prosecution agreement (NPA) shielding Epstein and his co-conspirators without notifying or consulting her—her “right to confer” and be treated fairly were emphatically ignored. After the district court acknowledged the CVRA violation but declined to provide relief on jurisdictional grounds following Epstein's death, Wild pressed her case through the Eleventh Circuit. In a contentious en banc ruling, the court recognized the profound injustice yet held that the CVRA does not allow victims to enforce their rights via standalone legal action absent a formal criminal proceeding. Feeling thwarted by this interpretation, Wild and her attorneys petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to resolve this critical question of whether the CVRA's protections extend to pre‑charge, behind‑the‑scenes deals that effectively nullify accountability.Wild's Supreme Court petition presents what she and her legal team call a “now-or-never opportunity” for the Court to buttress victim protections and clarify that the government cannot clandestinely dispense with criminal accountability while ignoring victims entirely—especially when the accused wield immense wealth and influence. Without such reckoning, the Justice Department may continue negotiating secret deals that nullify the statutory rights Congress fought to grant crime victims. Despite the urgency and gravity of the case, the Supreme Court ultimately declined to hear the appeal—effectively allowing the Eleventh Circuit's restrictive interpretation to stand and signaling that victims in similar predicaments may remain legally powerless when prosecutors circumvent the formal charging process.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Epstein victim seeks US Supreme Court review of prosecutors' secret deal - ABC News

First Lady Melania Trump, via her lawyer Alejandro Brito, has demanded that Hunter Biden retract and publicly apologize for comments he made in an August interview with Andrew Callaghan—claims that convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein introduced her to Donald Trump. Brito's letter, sent August 6, called the remarks “false, defamatory and extremely salacious,” asserting they caused “overwhelming financial and reputational harm,” and warned that failure to comply by August 7 would prompt a lawsuit seeking more than $1 billion in damages.Next up...Attorney General Pam Bondi has come under scrutiny amid mounting accusations from House Democrats that the Justice Department orchestrated a suspiciously favorable transfer of Ghislaine Maxwell—from a high-security facility in Florida to a low-security prison camp in Texas—shortly after she met privately with Deputy AG Todd Blanche. Lawmakers allege this highly unusual move, combined with Blanche's post-meeting interaction and the firing of a key prosecutor on the Epstein-Maxwell case, raises serious concerns of potential witness tampering and political influence. The DOJ has been pressed for documents, including meeting transcripts and details of the transfer decision, while critics argue the move may have violated standard protocols and breached DOJ and federal prison policies...to close things out...House Republicans are moving to reopen the Jeffrey Epstein case in Congress, with Oversight Committee Chair James Comer issuing a subpoena to the Justice Department for all records tied to Epstein's 2007 non-prosecution agreement and the circumstances of his 2019 jailhouse death, demanding delivery by August 19. The push comes as an unusual bipartisan alliance—Republican Rep. Thomas Massie and Democrat Rep. Ro Khanna—plans to bring Epstein's accusers to Capitol Hill for public hearings in early September to press for passage of an “Epstein Files Transparency Act” that would require unsealing related documents. The effort has sharpened divisions within the GOP, as some members join Democrats in urging disclosure while former president Donald Trump and House Speaker Mike Johnson downplay the matterto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Melania Trump demands Hunter Biden retract 'extremely salacious' Epstein comments - ABC NewsPam Bondi accused of possible witness tampering with Ghislaine Maxwell's prison transfer - Raw StoryEpstein case to ignite Capitol Hill post-recess

According to reporting, government files detailing Prince Andrew's decade-long tenure as the UK's Special Representative for International Trade and Investment will stay locked away until 2065—some 105 years after his birth—under royal family exemptions to Freedom of Information laws. In practice, this means the public banished from scrutinizing any records tied to his taxpayer-funded diplomatic role, just when transparency should be their highest priority following the Epstein debacle. This isn't mere protocol; it's a stonewall, shielding a scandal-riddled prince from public accountability under the guise of "royal privilege."The timing couldn't be more suspect: Prince Andrew's ties to Jeffrey Epstein have already cost him public trust, official titles, and patronages. Yet with the government's cloak of secrecy firmly in place, the ability to question how and why Epstein-linked business trips were arranged—or what exactly Andrew was doing on the public dime—vanishes into the archives. It's not just a blackout—it's institutional cover-up by omissionto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Prince Andrew files locked away until 2065 as royal biographer slams 'culture of secrecy' | Royal | News | Express.co.uk

Jeffrey Epstein's interest in transhumanism went far beyond idle curiosity—he saw it as a personal blueprint for shaping humanity's future in his own image. Using his foundation and wealth, he funded research in genetics, neuroscience, AI, and evolutionary dynamics, forging ties with elite scientists and institutions. Publicly, this philanthropy framed him as a visionary; privately, it aligned with deeply narcissistic goals such as creating a genetically engineered bloodline via his “baby ranch” plan, preserving his brain and body through cryonics, and potentially merging his consciousness with advanced technology. These ambitions stripped transhumanism of its egalitarian ideals, twisting it into a vehicle for personal immortality, hereditary control, and dominance over human evolution.The scientific community's willingness to accept his money—despite his criminal history—allowed Epstein to launder both his reputation and his dystopian ideas. Exclusive conferences, research grants, and one-on-one engagements gave him influence in shaping discourse on the future of humanity. His involvement underscores how speculative, high-stakes technologies can be exploited by the wealthy to entrench inequality and impose self-serving visions. Though Epstein's death halted his plans, the infrastructure, relationships, and normalization of ethically perilous ideas he helped foster remain. His story stands as a cautionary tale: without strong ethical guardrails, the power to reshape life itself can slip into the hands of those driven not by the betterment of all, but by vanity, exploitation, and the desire to control the human future.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Leaked correspondence between Jes Staley—former CEO of Barclays and long-time JPMorgan executive—and Jeffrey Epstein laid bare more than just casual business exchanges; they revealed a troubling bond rooted in intimacy, trust, and privilege. In one exchange, Staley mused, “That was fun. Say hi to Snow White,” to which Epstein replied, “What character would you like next?” Staley coyly responded, “Beauty and the Beast,” turning their relationship into a grotesque pantomime. More damningly, Staley described Epstein as “family” and spoke of a “profound” connection, while photos of young women were also swapped—all under the guise of everyday correspondence. Far from distancing himself, Staley sustained contact well past Epstein's 2008 conviction, even joining him on his private island in 2009—behavior that defied any claim of a “purely professional” relationship.The fallout was swift—and deserved. The UK's Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) concluded that Staley “recklessly misled” both Barclays and regulators by downplaying the closeness of his ties with Epstein. A £1.8 million fine (later reduced to £1.1 million) and a lifetime ban from senior financial roles followed. The Upper Tribunal upheld the sanctions, emphasizing that Staley knowingly took a calculated risk, hoping the truth would stay buried. But the emails, held up like digital incriminators, ensured his downfall. His denials, evasive demeanor in court, and attempt to frame the relationship as innocuous only magnified the breach of trust. In financial leadership, reputation is everything—and Staley burned his.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Epstein-Staley Emails Reveal Friendship Forged at JPMorgan (yahoo.com)

AlabamaCindy Myers declared winner in Tuesday's GOP special primary runoff voteCongressman Moore says record in US house to be part of senate campaignAuburn University to sunset its "test optional" admissions process by 2027Hoover city council  members say oversight role bypassed by mayor BrocatoAerospace company Lockheed Martin to expand its facility in CortlandVideo of debate between Orange Beach mayoral candidates now on websiteNationalAn Appeals court rules in favor of Trump admin cutting foreign aid fundsTrump to meet with Russian president this Friday in Alaska for peace talksFBI busts human trafficking ring run out of  4 hotels in Omaha, NebraskaDoctor at OH Children's hospital charged with 150K child sex abuse images8th Circuit Court rules that AR can ban transgender surgeries for minorsA press conference set for 9.3 in DC with victims of Jeffrey Epstein

Welcome to Right On Radio with host Jeff. In this episode Jeff weaves a wide-ranging, provocative show that blends current headlines, historical curiosities, conspiracy theories, and personal updates. He opens with musical and cultural clips — including Sammy Hagar — to set themes about division, survival, and the coming year 2025. From there the program jumps into a discussion about tunnels and subterranean discoveries, citing a 1934 LA Times piece about alleged lizard-people catacombs under Fort Moore Hill and asking whether secret passageways might connect the Smithsonian to the White House and Capitol Hill.   Jeff plays short, memorable clips — Nancy Pelosi's ‘reptilian' soundbite, Peter Thiel interviews, parody news from JakeGTV, and an ex-CIA commander's commentary — and uses them to explore recurrent themes: reptilian/shape-shifter conspiracy lore, elite blackmail and honey-trap operations, and the long shadow of Jeffrey Epstein. The episode examines claims connecting Epstein to intelligence operations and Mossad, and it revisits provocative material about 9/11, including references to a U.S. Army report, Trump's earlier writings about bin Laden and terrorism, and allegations of false-flag operations.   The show digs into institutional power and accountability: Jeff reads and reacts to a recent White House letter directing an internal review of Smithsonian exhibitions and ties that to questions about hidden artifacts, national narratives, and elite influence. He also discusses FISA, Russiagate, subpoenas aimed at former officials (Barr, Comey, Garland, Holder), and newly reported links and coincidences — such as the Dalton School/Jeffrey Epstein connection and Bill Barr's family history — to argue a pattern of establishment complicity and cover-ups.   Scientific and cultural angles are included: Jeff plays a brief clip of Harvard scientist Avi Loeb talking about the societal implications of contact with extraterrestrial life — how an external threat or arrival could function as a unifying, messianic event — and invites listeners to reconsider how current narratives might align with older myths and songs. The program mixes serious claims with moments of entertainment and parody, asking listeners to 'connect the dots' but also laugh when needed.   Jeff closes with a personal channel update and plea for support: his father's health crisis will require time and may temporarily change the show's format, shifting toward shorter news hits and fewer long videos through September. He thanks listeners for prayers and support, promises to return to regular programming, and leaves listeners with a feel-good clip celebrating Southern hospitality and human kindness.   What to expect: a provocative, clip-driven episode that moves between mainstream reporting and fringe theories — UFOs and aliens, reptilian conspiracies, Epstein/Mossad allegations, 9/11 scrutiny, FISA/Russiagate developments, institutional reviews of the Smithsonian, and a candid host update about the channel's short-term future. Guests and sources heard or referenced include Sammy Hagar (music clip), Nancy Pelosi (archival audio), Peter Thiel (interview excerpts), JakeGTV (parody), an ex-CIA commander (commentary), Avi Loeb (Harvard scientist), and various archival news items and documents cited throughout. Thank you for Listening to Right on Radio. Prayerfully consider supporting Right on Radio. Click Here for all links, Right on Community ROC, Podcast web links, Freebies, Products (healing mushrooms, EMP Protection) Social media, courses and more... https://linktr.ee/RightonRadio Live Right in the Real World! We talk God and Politics, Faith Based Broadcast News, views, Opinions and Attitudes We are Your News Now. Keep the Faith  

As the lawsuit between the Epstein survivors and the USVI continues to take shape, we are getting a few hints about which way things are headed, especially considering that the USVI and their motion to dismiss has been denied, and they have now been hit with a second amended complaint.   Not only that, but they've been ordered by the Judge to respond.  In this episode, we take a trip back down to the USVI to get an update on the latest back and forth and to see where things currently stand with the lawsuit. to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Amended Complaint Alleges V.I. Officials Conspired with Epstein for Financial Gain | St. Thomas Source (stthomassource.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Adam kicks things off by sharing his excitement for the upcoming Rolex Historics at Monterey's Laguna Seca before chatting about his plans to spend time aboard Rick Caruso's massive superyacht. He then reacts to Stephen A. Smith's explanation of why Pete Buttigieg is polling at 0% among black voters despite leading the 2028 Democratic primary race overall, and weighs in on Denver's bid to host the Gay Games. Then, Adam and Jason “Mayhem” Miller dive into trending headlines, from Emma Raducanu wanting a crying baby removed during a tense 23-minute game, to Jannik Sinner's Wimbledon serve being interrupted by a rogue champagne cork, to Los Angeles officials cracking down on dangerous street takeover meet-ups with tougher penalties and possible jail time.Then, renowned attorney and author Alan Dershowitz calls in! Adam opens by asking about the importance of political balance in American governance before shifting focus to the growing challenges of living in California. Alan connects the homelessness crisis in major cities to policy decisions dating back to Ronald Reagan, while Adam voices concern over the increasing trend of corporations and publications blacklisting people for their political views. They also touch on the controversies surrounding Jeffrey Epstein—including Alan's own legal entanglements, Trump's alleged involvement, and the mystery of Epstein's wealth—before Alan shares his candid thoughts on the Democratic Party and the Obamas.Lastly, Adam recaps his recent fire vlog where he interviews Rick Caruso about how he successfully protected his properties during the Southern California wildfires. Adam and Jason Mayhem Miller discuss the value of trade work, with Adam arguing that college isn't always the best—or only—path to a successful career. They also point out Caltrans work trucks they always see on the freeway and imagine the nightmare of crashing into one. Finally, Adam vents his frustration over a Los Angeles tunnel being tagged with graffiti less than a day after it was repainted, using it as a jumping-off point to rant about modern parenting and the need to teach kids common sense.Get it on.FOR MORE WITH ALAN DERSHOWITZ:BOOK: The Preventive State: Challenge of Preventing Serious Harms While Preserving Essential LibertiesTWITTER: @AlanDershFOR MORE WITH JASON “MAYHEM” MILLER: INSTAGRAM & TWITTER: @mayhemmillerWEBSITE: www.mayhemnow.com Thank you for supporting our sponsors:BetOnlineHomes.comoreillyauto.com/ADAMOpenPhone.com/adamPluto.tvThriveMarket.com/ACSLIVE SHOWS: August 29 - Provo, UTAugust 31 - Torrance, CASeptember 6 - Charlotte, NCSeptember 12-13 - El Paso, TX (4 Shows)See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Saagar and Emily discuss Trump rescheduling Marijuana, an Orthodox Nun slams Israel with Tucker Carlson, and Zohran Mamdani slams Andrew Cuomo for ties to Jeffrey Epstein. To become a Breaking Points Premium Member and watch/listen to the show AD FREE, uncut and 1 hour early visit: www.breakingpoints.com Merch Store: https://shop.breakingpoints.com/See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Welcome to the premiere of 'Inside Trump's Head', a new twice-weekly deep dive from The Daily Beast into the most unpredictable, unsettling, and endlessly fascinating mind in modern politics. Host Joanna Coles teams up with best-selling Trump biographer Michael Wolff to explore what's really driving Donald Trump.In this inaugural episode, Wolff shares exclusive White House conversations suggesting Trump may be ready to give up large parts of Ukraine in a high-stakes meeting with Vladimir Putin — all to distract from the ceaseless Jeffrey Epstein scandal threatening his grip on the MAGA base. From the hidden hand of Jared Kushner to Steve Bannon's private doubts, from Putin's possible kompromat to the Epstein “drumbeat” that won't fade, Coles and Wolff go spelunking into the dark, dank cavern where all of Trump's decisions begin. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Vince Neil cash grab concert, bad band names, Bryan Kohberger hates prison, diarrhea shuts down a plane, Jennifer Aniston's Matthew Perry lies, rooting against Maz's Hot Takes, Cop Cam tug of war, and the World's Largest Penis breaks its owner's arm. Jim is getting his thumb fixed tomorrow. What are the worst band names of all-time? Maz's hot take is happily falling apart. Donald Trump will cancel The View sooner or later. Bill Maher isn't a fan. Rosie O'Donnell is trying not to be huge. Vince Neil lumbers through a show in New York. The drummer steals the show. Olivia Rodrigo brought David Byrne out onstage at the Governor's Ball. Taylor Swift's appearance on New Heights hits tonight. Andy Green was the subject of a death hoax. He's alive. Jennifer Aniston LIED about the well-being of Matthew Perry. Jonathan Schmitz was totally ambushed on Jenny Jones. The murder's out of prison now. Matt Barr IS his penis. Jonah Falcon's weiner is way bigger. Stuttering John's lawsuit against Karl will be dismissed. High Pitch Erik makes more on Cameo than most Howard Stern staffers. A woman has come forward to admit her diarrhea shut down an airplane. Inmates are making Bryan Kohberger's life a living hell. Leonardo DiCaprio was searched entering a party in Ibiza. Marc Maron won't stop complaining about podcasts. Derek Hough is replacing Billy Bush on Extra. LA Dodgers pitcher/DH Shohei Ohtani is in trouble again. JaMo got into a fight with a Miami Dolphin in preseason practice. Reminder that Jeffrey Epstein has an egg-shaped penis. Sydney Sweeney is back and looking good. Drew brings a cop cam featuring a tug-of-war. David Geffen fires back at BranDon's former neighbor. If you'd like to help support the show… consider subscribing to our YouTube Channel, Facebook, Instagram and Twitter (Drew Lane, Marc Fellhauer, Trudi Daniels, Jim Bentley and BranDon).

Tonight on The Last Word: Donald Trump is trying to distract from the Epstein scandal. Also, Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse says Trump's Justice Department “doesn't care about truth or law.” And Trump lashes out at criticism of his tariff chaos. Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse and Paul Krugman join Lawrence O'Donnell.

The Mega Group, Jeffrey Epstein, Mossad, Monica Lewinsky, and how it all ties together. 00:00 - Start. 00:52 - Epstein, Monica Lewinsky, and Mossad. 26:35 - The rise of Les Wexner. 35:31 - Judge rejects Trump's bid to unseal Ghislaine's records. 37:49 - Twitter user's "expose" on my secret wealth. 45:30 - Comments. PreBorn! Donate securely by calling 855-601-2229 or by visiting https://preborn.com/candace Masa Chips Get 25% off your order with promo code CANDACE at http://www.Masachips.com/Candace The Wellness Company Upgrade your oral care with SMILE! Visit http://twc.health/candace and use code CANDACE for 15% Off + Free Shipping on every order. American Financing Call American Financing today to find out how customers are saving an avg of $800/mo. 800-795-1210 or visit http://www.AmericanFinancing.net/owens NMLS 182334, https://www.nmlsconsumeraccess.org Candace Official Website: https://candaceowens.com Candace Merch: https://shop.candaceowens.com Candace on Apple Podcasts: https://t.co/Pp5VZiLXbq Candace on Spotify: https://t.co/16pMuADXuT Candace on Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/RealCandaceO Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Original air date: July 15, 2025 The MAGA movement has been in full meltdown ever since President Trump's Department of Justice concluded they have no evidence that sex offender Jeffrey Epstein kept a client list or was murdered in jail. This contradicted a major MAGA conspiracy theory, and MAGA influencers are screaming cover-up. Tucker Carlson just ratcheted this all up by attacking Trump: He faulted Trump's government for failing to take questions about the matter seriously. In another heresy, Carlson even criticized Trump himself for brushing off MAGA's anger over it. Carlson's broadside has some Republicans quietly grappling with why he is so successfully capturing MAGA anger about the Epstein fiasco. We talked to historian Nicole Hemmer, author of several major books about the right and its media networks. She expertly decodes the MAGA pathologies animating the Epstein drama, digs into their deeper sources on the right, and explains what it all says about today's Trumpified political world. Looking for More from the DSR Network? Click Here: https://linktr.ee/deepstateradio Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit www.politix.fmDonald Trump has commandeered Washington DC's police force and deployed federal agents and national guardsmen to patrol DC streets, on plainly pretextual grounds. In this episode we'll discuss:* What makes this affront to DC sovereignty unusually offensive;* Trump's stated reasons for seizing power, and how to see through them;* What, if anything, elected Democrats should say and do to defend district residentsThen, behind the paywall, there's good reason to suspect Trump hopes his DC invasion will distract us from less flattering news. So we're not going to let him! We discuss the latest indications that Trump has damaged the economy, the steps that can be taken in the event Trump tries to fabricate economic data, and the most recent developments in the Jeffrey Epstein scandal.All that, plus the full Politix archive are available to paid subscribers—just upgrade your subscription and pipe full episodes directly to your favorite podcast app via your own private feed.Further reading:* Matt on the actual policy obstacles to more effective policing in DC.* Brian on why DC residents are perfectly right to be frustrated with national Democrats for leaving us vulnerable to this unwelcome takeover.* Trump's hackish nominee to oversee government economic data wants to stop releasing government economic data.

Truth Be Told with Booker Scott – House Oversight compels Bill and Hillary Clinton, along with top political figures, to testify on Jeffrey Epstein. Bipartisan pressure mounts as over 80% of Americans demand the release of files. Subpoenas target key names and the Department of Justice, signaling potential revelations from a rare political consensus in a high-stakes investigation...

President Donald Trump speaks with European leaders & Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky about this his meeting Friday in Alaska with Russian President Vladimir Putin, warning of "severe consequences" if Putin does agree to end the war in Ukraine and saying that if the first meeting goes well, a second meeting with both Putin & Zelensky could happen soon; President Trump says he will ask Congress to extend beyond 30 days the federal takeover of the Washington, DC police force and suggests that he could extend it on his own by declaring a 'national emergency'; President goes to the Kennedy Center to announce this year's Kennedy Center Honorees that he says he had a large hand in choosing: singers George Strait & Gloria Gaynor, rock band KISS and actors Sylvester Stallone & Michael Crawford; Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent calls on the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates half a point in September; House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) speaks about the Democratic Party agenda at a meeting of Illinois Democratic Party officials in Springfield; survivors of the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein will speak at a news conference in Washington when Congress returns in September, invited by one Republican and one Democratic House Member, who are pushing for the president to releases all the files on the federal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Time Stamps:7:43 - Liberation Day in DC16:09 - Neuro-linguistic programming (NLP)22:29 - Subterranean Sex Abuse32:34 - McMartin Tunnels/Monarch Mind Control36:15 - One Nation Under Stockholm Syndrome41:41 - Waco--Ruby Ridge--9/1148:02 - The Jonestown Massacre56:30 - Postmortem/Call-in Portion1:07:38 - Natacha Jaitt's Suspicious Death1:13:20 - PragerU's White House Partnership1:25:00 - CDC Shooting/RFK Jr. Cancels $500 million in mRNA Vaccine Funding1:53:31 - Ghislaine Maxwell's Work Release Program2:10:23 - Jeffrey Epstein's HandlerVenture into the shadowy realms of power and secrecy with Already Dead, where hosts Jose Galison (@towergangjose) and Austin Picard (@theatrethugawp) dissect the intricate web of conspiracy, covert operations, and the underlying political machinations that might just be pulling the strings of our society.What to Expect:Live Listener Interaction: Call in to share your theories, ask burning questions, or discuss personal experiences related to the topics at hand. In-Depth Explorations: Each episode focuses on a different conspiracy or hidden aspect of political history, offering a platform to question and analyze what's often left unsaid. Thought-Provoking Guests: We invite individuals with insider knowledge or those who've taken the red pill to discuss topics that range from the fringe to the forefront of conspiracy culture. Critical Analysis of Current Affairs: We don't just report on events; we interpret them through the lens of parapolitics, looking for patterns and hidden agendas.Join Us:Every Tuesday at 9:30 PM ET, dive into the depths of the unknown with us. Subscribe, participate in our live call-ins, and be part of a community that seeks to understand the world beyond the surface narrative.Disclaimer: This podcast thrives on speculation, hypothesis, and the examination of alternative theories. It's meant to provoke thought and encourage personal research. Not all discussed is proven fact, but rather a call to question, explore, and understand.Warning: For those not ready to challenge their worldview, tread carefully. Once you enter the world of Already Dead, you might find that the truth is often already dead to the uninitiated. Welcome aboard, where curiosity is your guide.Please consider supporting our work-Austin's Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/c/TheUnderclassPodcastAustin's Spreaker: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-underclass-podcast--6511540Austin's Rumble: https://rumble.com/user/TheUnderclassPodcastAustin's YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@TheUnderclassPodcast#LiberationDay #ModernManchurian #ManchurianCandidate #NLP #NeurolinguisticProgramming #Nueralink #BigBalls #SubterraneanSexAbuse #McMartinTunnels #MonarchMindControl #StockholmSyndrome #Waco #RubyRidge #Jonestown #NatachaJaitt #PragerU #CDCShooting #mRNAVaccine #GhislaineMaxwell #JeffreyEpsteinBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-underclass-podcast--6511540/support.

The lawsuit filed by Jane Doe against billionaire Leon Black alleges that he raped her at Jeffrey Epstein's Manhattan townhouse when she was a vulnerable young woman in her early twenties. Filed in 2023 under New York's Adult Survivors Act, the civil suit claims Black used Epstein's residence—a known hub of abuse—as the setting for the assault, and that Epstein facilitated the encounter. Jane Doe alleges that she was trafficked and groomed within Epstein's network and that Black's actions were part of the larger pattern of abuse and exploitation that Epstein orchestrated for his powerful associates. The lawsuit accuses Black not only of rape, but also of intentional infliction of emotional distress and other civil claims tied to Epstein's broader trafficking enterprise.Black has denied the allegations and filed a countersuit against the accuser and her attorneys, claiming extortion and reputational harm. However, the civil complaint against him highlights a critical and recurring theme in the Epstein saga: the deep connections between Epstein and prominent men who allegedly used his network for their own gratification under the guise of friendship or philanthropy. The suit adds to the growing scrutiny of Black's long-standing ties to Epstein, including previous revelations that he paid Epstein over $150 million for undisclosed “financial advice” long after Epstein's 2008 conviction. Jane Doe's case underscores how Epstein's reach extended well beyond his own crimes, into the lives—and alleged actions—of the elite men he surrounded himself with.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.602764.152.0.pdf

In the case of Jane Doe v. Leon Black (Civil Action No.: 1:23-cv-06418-JGLC), Plaintiff Jane Doe has filed a memorandum opposing Defendant Leon Black's motion to compel her to publicly disclose her full name. Doe argues that revealing her identity would subject her to undue harassment and invasion of privacy, especially given the sensitive nature of the allegations, which include sexual assault. She emphasizes that proceeding under a pseudonym is essential to protect her from potential retaliation and to preserve her privacy.Doe further contends that maintaining her anonymity does not prejudice the defendant, as Black is already aware of her true identity and can adequately prepare his defense. She asserts that courts often permit plaintiffs to proceed pseudonymously in cases involving sexual assault to encourage victims to come forward without fear of public exposure. Therefore, Doe requests that the court deny Black's motion and allow her to continue using a pseudonym throughout the proceedings.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.602764.127.0.pdf

For years, Bill Clinton has managed to stay largely on the periphery of the Epstein scandal, despite documented flights on the financier's private jet and multiple photographs placing him in Epstein's orbit. His denials, combined with a media environment reluctant to press too hard on a former president, have allowed him to weather the storm with minimal direct scrutiny. While others in Epstein's circle faced lawsuits, depositions, and public disgrace, Clinton benefited from a mix of political insulation and a public narrative that treated his connections as incidental rather than integral.That protective bubble may now be at risk. With a subpoena in play, Clinton could be compelled to answer questions under oath—something that strips away the layers of carefully crafted statements and PR-managed denials. The risk isn't just reputational; sworn testimony opens the door to perjury charges if his answers contradict existing evidence or witness accounts. For a figure who has spent decades avoiding legal entanglement over Epstein, this moment could mark a sharp turn from calculated distance to unavoidable confrontation.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:The truth about Bill Clinton's cozy friendship with Jeffrey Epstein and his 'lovely girls' as House subpoenas testimony

In the mid-2000s, Jeffrey Epstein faced mounting allegations in Palm Beach, Florida, that he had sexually abused dozens of underage girls under the guise of paying them for massages. The case began in 2005 when the parents of a 14-year-old girl reported him to local police, prompting a months-long investigation that uncovered a network of young girls—many recruited by other minors—who said they were coerced into sexual acts at Epstein's Palm Beach mansion. Police gathered statements, physical evidence, and corroborating accounts, ultimately identifying over 30 potential victims. The Palm Beach Police Department recommended multiple felony charges, including unlawful sexual activity with minors and lewd and lascivious acts.Instead of proceeding to a state trial, the case was taken over by the U.S. Attorney's Office, leading to the controversial 2007 non-prosecution agreement (NPA). Brokered behind closed doors, the NPA allowed Epstein to plead guilty in state court to two lesser prostitution-related charges—one involving a minor—in exchange for federal prosecutors agreeing not to pursue broader sex trafficking charges. He served 13 months in the Palm Beach County jail under a work-release program that let him leave six days a week. The deal also granted immunity to “any potential co-conspirators,” effectively shielding alleged enablers from prosecution. This resolution, kept secret from victims in violation of the Crime Victims' Rights Act, became a flashpoint for public outrage and later federal litigation when it was revealed just how sweeping and lenient the agreement had been.In this episode, we see that corruption in action as we hear from one of Jeffrey Epstein's first accusers during a deposition given in 2008.to contact me:gov.uscourts.flsd.318730.1.0.pdf

Eileen Guggenheim, a former aide to then-Prince Charles and now leading the New York Academy of Art, emphatically denied any role in facilitating an introduction between Charles and Jeffrey Epstein. Her statement came in response to recurring tabloid insinuations suggesting that she had served as the conduit linking the future king to the disgraced financier. Her denial was swift and pointed: simply put, she had no involvement in bringing the two into contact.Yet this sort of sweeping, “nothing to see here” denial has become almost a reflex among those who orbited Epstein — a well-rehearsed performance of indignation that sidesteps the deeper questions. Guggenheim can insist she never introduced Charles to Epstein, but the problem is that these denials are often delivered in a vacuum, without transparency, documentation, or a willingness to open the books. In the Epstein ecosystem, too many people have tried to firewall their reputations with carefully worded statements, betting that the press won't dig past the headline. Whether her claim is true or not, it lands in the same well-worn pattern: elite figures distancing themselves from Epstein only when their names surface, and offering little more than their own word as proof.To contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8652923/Prince-Charles-former-aide-denies-introducing-student-Jeffrey-Epstein.html

In a long-overdue act of transparency, a federal judge ordered the names of roughly 170 individuals—once shaded behind the label “John Doe” or “Jane Doe”—to be unsealed in court filings stemming from Virginia Giuffre's defamation lawsuit against Ghislaine Maxwell. The documents revealed luminaries like Bill Clinton (previously “Doe 36”), Prince Andrew (“actually Jane Doe 162” in context of testimony), hedge fund titan Glenn Dubin, modeling mogul Jean-Luc Brunel, and others represented alongside Epstein's victims, employees, and passersby.Rather than simple exposure of identities, this unmasking lifted the curtain on how deeply entrenched Epstein's network was, reaching into the upper echelons of finance, royalty, and politics.But make no mistake: public exposure doesn't mean public accountability. Unsealing the names confirmed countless high‑profile connections, yet it stops short of revealing misconduct or initiating investigations. In many cases, the inclusion in these documents wasn't tied to wrongdoing—people merely appeared in correspondence or witness lists. Still, the moral stain lingers. If Epstein's proximity wasn't disqualifying, what is? That these names remained cloaked so long—until a lawsuit ended in 2024—speaks volumes about the protection privilege continues to afford the powerful.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Over 170 of Jeffrey Epstein's high-profile associates will be NAMED in court documents set to be unsealed in the first days of 2024 | Daily Mail Online

Prince Andrew's attempt to frame the infamous Sandringham “shooting weekend” with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell as some quaint countryside tradition is pure insult to the public's intelligence. This wasn't a friendly clay pigeon match with the neighbors — this was a royal estate opening its gates to a predator whose crimes were already whispered about in elite circles, alongside his chief enabler. By pretending it was just a harmless weekend, Andrew is asking the world to believe that seating a sex offender in the inner sanctum of the monarchy was normal, acceptable, and worthy of no further scrutiny. It's not just tone-deaf — it's a calculated rewriting of history designed to make the grotesque seem banal.The reality is that this “weekend” was more than just bad optics; it was a glaring act of validation. Royal invitations are currency, and Epstein cashed in on one of the most valuable of them all: a place inside the royal household's inner circle. The presence of Epstein and Maxwell at such an event didn't happen by accident — it happened because Andrew either didn't care about their reputations, or worse, didn't see them as disqualifying. His attempt to launder that decision into a “nothing to see here” anecdote isn't just dishonest, it's a direct example of how powerful people normalize predators and then act offended when questioned about it.To contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comSource:https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/16113252/prince-andrew-shooting-party-sexual-assault-court-hearing/

Virginia Roberts Giuffre forcefully praised Judge Loretta Preska's decision to unseal hundreds of documents from her 2015 defamation suit against Ghislaine Maxwell, emphasizing that the public's right to know was far more important than the shield of secrecy favored by the elite. Giuffre—whose suit formed the backbone of the Epstein revelations—welcomed the court's move to begin releasing names and redacted filings, saying that letting these documents remain buried was exactly the kind of suppression that protected predators and damaged survivors who dared to speak out.She made clear that the disclosures were far overdue, and that the people who sought to keep these documents sealed were the ones with something to lose. Giuffre argued that while pseudonymous third parties and powerful individuals lurked behind most sealing motions, transparency should never be sacrificed at the altar of privacy—especially when the crimes involved minors and high‑level enablers. By characterizing Preska's unsealing order as a minor yet vital victory, Giuffre signaled that sunlight remains the most powerful disinfectant in the Epstein saga.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Jeffrey Epstein victim Virginia Giuffre taunts those to be named in unsealed docs (nypost.com)

A former Gates Foundation staffer, speaking to The Daily Beast, claimed that Bill Gates pursued contact with Jeffrey Epstein—despite the latter's status as a convicted sex offender—because he believed Epstein had the connections to help him secure a Nobel Peace Prize. According to the source, Gates viewed the Nobel as something he “wanted more than anything else in the world,” and apparently tolerated the public relations risk because Epstein “could know the right people… to massage things.”utters away any sense of moral clarity. Gates's spokesperson categorically denied that he had ever campaigned for the Nobel, or regarded it as an ambition, and stated that he would have rebuffed any Epstein-backed efforts or schemes.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bill Gates is desperate for what he can't buy: a Nobel Prize (nypost.com)

Flanked by half his cabinet and citing crimes against a DOGE staffer, Donald Trump announces that he's deploying 800 National Guard troops to Washington and federalizing the city's police department. Jon and Lovett react to Trump's desperate show of force, then break down his new plan to negotiate a Russia-Ukraine peace deal and JD Vance's latest attempt to spin the Epstein files crisis as “full transparency.” Then, Lovett talks to The New Yorker's David Kirkpatrick about his big new investigation into how much the Trump family is profiting off of the presidency. For a closed-captioned version of this episode, click here. For a transcript of this episode, please email transcripts@crooked.com and include the name of the podcast.

Rep. James Comer (R-Ky.)  joins to discuss how Democrats and Republicans have voted together to subpoena Bill and Hillary Clinton to testify on Jeffrey Epstein. A Democrat whistleblower has revealed that Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) personally authorized the leaking of classified information to smear Donald Trump in what was described as an unethical, illegal, and treasonous act. Glenn and Stu discuss the rise of AI bots being used for interviews, and while it's easy to spot now, soon that line will be blurred. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

President Trump has his focus set on tackling the rising crime in Washington, D.C., yet somehow the Left is fighting him on it. The media is claiming that crime is down in D.C., but Glenn doesn't buy it. One ABC anchor broke the script and admitted that crime in D.C. is a massive problem. Could Trump's D.C. takeover lead to D.C. turning into a purple district? Rep. James Comer (R-Ky.)  joins to discuss how Democrats and Republicans have voted together to subpoena Bill and Hillary Clinton to testify on Jeffrey Epstein. A Democrat whistleblower has revealed that Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) personally authorized the leaking of classified information to smear Donald Trump in what was described as an unethical, illegal, and treasonous act. Glenn and Stu discuss the rise of AI bots being used for interviews, and while it's easy to spot now, soon that line will be blurred. Ilay David, whose younger brother is being held hostage by Hamas, joins to discuss the horrific video Hamas released of his brother digging his own grave.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is facing massive backlash — both domestic and international — over his government's decision late last week to take over Gaza City. Thousands marched in Tel Aviv Saturday to protest the decision, while the families of some of the remaining hostages called for a nationwide strike. On Monday, Australia became the latest country to announce plans to recognize a Palestinian state, while French President Emmanuel Macron called the Israeli plan 'a disaster of unprecedented gravity.' Already Palestinian health officials say 61,000 people in Gaza have died since the start of the war. Matthew Chance, chief global affairs correspondent for CNN, joins us from Jerusalem to talk about the latest in the war, the Israeli killing of five Al Jazeera journalists Sunday, and the risks that come with yet another escalation in the conflict.And in headlines: President Donald Trump ordered a federal takeover of Washington D.C.'s police, a federal judge blocked the release of Jeffrey Epstein co-conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell's grand jury transcripts, and AOL said it's ending its dial-up internet service.Show Notes:Check out Matthew's reporting – www.cnn.com/profiles/matthew-chanceCall Congress – 202-224-3121Subscribe to the What A Day Newsletter – https://tinyurl.com/3kk4nyz8What A Day – YouTube – https://www.youtube.com/@whatadaypodcastFollow us on Instagram – https://www.instagram.com/crookedmedia/For a transcript of this episode, please visit crooked.com/whataday