Dialogue intended to reach an agreement
POPULARITY
Categories
Ready to squeeze more profit out of your wholesaling business — without doubling your workload? Todd Toback reveals the secret sauce to pulling an extra $40K–$50K a month from the deals and leads you already have. From sharpening your negotiation game to labeling leads like a pro, this episode is your roadmap to doing less busy work and making way more money.---------Show notes:(0:48) Beginning of today's episode(2:19) Investing in marketing(3:52) You always need to sharpen your skills(4:23) Label your leads on your database (hot, warm, follow up) (5:52) Getting back to the fundamentals(7:40) Extracting more leads(8:07) Negotiate right(8:20) Compress your timeline----------Resources:Faster Seller LeadsTo speak with Brent or one of our other expert coaches call (281) 835-4201 or schedule your free discovery call here to learn about our mentorship programs and become part of the TribeGo to Wholesalingincgroup.com to become part of one of the fastest growing Facebook communities in the Wholesaling space. Get all of your burning Wholesaling questions answered, gain access to JV partnerships, and connect with other "success minded" Rhinos in the community.It's 100% free to join. The opportunities in this community are endless, what are you waiting for?
In this powerful interview, Rebecca Zung and Dr. Ingrid Clayton expose the hidden trauma response known as fawning—the disease to please. Learn how people-pleasing, codependency, and boundary collapse are actually survival responses to deep relational trauma. Discover how to heal, set boundaries, and reclaim your authentic power from narcissists and toxic dynamics. What you'll learn: The fawn response — the hidden fourth trauma response beyond fight, flight, and freeze. How fawning develops in childhood as a survival mechanism in unsafe or abusive environments. Why people-pleasers and codependents aren't weak — they're trauma survivors seeking safety. How narcissists exploit fawners through guilt, obligation, and fear of abandonment. The connection between fawning, complex PTSD (CPTSD), and chronic relationship patterns. Practical healing tools from somatic therapy and self-regulation to rebuild inner safety. How to identify trauma reenactment and stop attracting narcissistic or manipulative partners. Why setting boundaries and “taking up space” is not mean — it's healthy and necessary. Steps to transform from appeasement and fear into authentic self-worth and empowerment. About the guests: Rebecca Zung – Top 1% attorney turned narcissism negotiation expert, author of SLAY the Bully, and creator of the SLAY method for reclaiming power in toxic relationships. Dr. Ingrid Clayton – Clinical psychologist, trauma specialist, and author of Believing Me, who brings deep insight into fawning, CPTSD, and somatic healing. Watch if you're: Recovering from narcissistic abuse, codependency, or people-pleasing. Tired of always apologizing or walking on eggshells. Ready to take your power back and stop living for others' approval.
Before we can negotiate with others, we must first learn to negotiate with ourselves — to balance our inner voices, our fears, and our dreams. Imagine if children were taught early on to recognize their emotions, to pause before reacting, and to choose compassion over self-criticism. How different might their futures be? In a world that often rushes them to grow up too fast, teaching children to understand and value themselves may be one of the most powerful life lessons we can offer. In this episode, Cindy Watson sits down with the inspiring Armida Espinoza to explore “Teaching Our Children To Negotiate With Themselves.” Armida, a first-generation Mexican American and retired bilingual teacher, has dedicated her life to empowering young minds. As an author and advocate for children's emotional and cognitive development, she brings a powerful message about nurturing self-awareness, confidence, and inner dialogue from an early age. Through her work, Armida encourages children to find their voice, recognize their worth, and understand that no matter their age, they have the power to make a meaningful impact in the world. This conversation with Armida Espinoza reminds us that self-negotiation isn't just a skill — it's a foundation for resilience, empathy, and authentic confidence. In this episode, you will learn: Why it's critical to start learning at a very young age. How can parents or educators support kids in developing their skills? How does the book help children negotiate with fears and uncertainties when they are faced with unfamiliar experiences or environments to learn new things. How can hope be a part of a child's internal negotiation process. How to recognize which voice to listen to. How to negotiate your own inner critic. And many more! Learn more about Armida: Website: https://www.armidaespinoza.com/ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/armiespinoza/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ArmidaEspinozaAuthor/ Get her book! Amazon US Amazon Canada If you're looking to up-level your negotiation skills, I have everything from online to group to my signature one-on-one mastermind & VIP experiences available to help you better leverage your innate power to get more of what you want and deserve in life. Check out our website at www.artofFeminineNegotiation.com if that sounds interesting to you. Get Cindy's book here: Amazon https://www.amazon.com/Art-Feminine-Negotiation-Boardroom-Bedroom-ebook/dp/B0B8KPCYZP?inf_contact_key=94d07c699eea186d2adfbddfef6fb9e2&inf_contact_key=013613337189d4d12be8d2bca3c26821680f8914173f9191b1c0223e68310bb1 EBook https://www.amazon.com/Art-Feminine-Negotiation-Boardroom-Bedroom-ebook/dp/B0B8KPCYZP?inf_contact_key=94d07c699eea186d2adfbddfef6fb9e2&inf_contact_key=013613337189d4d12be8d2bca3c26821680f8914173f9191b1c0223e68310bb1 Barnes and Noble https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/the-art-of-feminine-negotiation-cindy-watson/1141499614?ean=9781631959776 CONNECT WITH CINDY: Website: www.womenonpurpose.ca Website: www.practicingwithpurpose.org Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/womenonpurposecommunity/ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/womenonpurposecoaching/ LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/thecindywatson Show: https://www.womenonpurpose.ca/media/podcast-2/ X(Twitter): https://twitter.com/womenonpurpose1 YouTube:https://www.youtube.com/@hersuasion Email: cindy@womenonpurpose.ca
The discard phase is the most dangerous stage of narcissistic abuse — and the easiest to miss until it's already underway. In this deep dive, I walk you through clear early signs, the smear-campaign setup, and how hoovering keeps you trauma-bonded. Then we map the seven real reasons narcissists discard, the top 10 lies they say after, how to spot a fake discard, and the steps to rebuild emotional autonomy and protect your leverage. You'll learn: ✅ 10 early discard signs and 5 warning phrases you must not ignore ✅ How trauma bonding is created and why hoovering works ✅ 7 reasons they discard (and how to turn the last one into leverage) ✅ Top 10 things narcissists say after discarding you — decoded ✅ Real vs fake discard — how to tell and what to do next ✅ Boundaries, documentation, and the SLAY method to stay in control
#633 Ever wondered how creators turn brand deals into serious revenue? In this episode, host Brien Gearin sits down with Justin Moore, founder of Creator Wizard and author of Sponsor Magnet, to uncover the secrets behind landing, pricing, and negotiating high-value sponsorships. Justin shares how he and his wife went from free product collaborations to earning over $5 million through brand partnerships — and how he now teaches creators and business owners to do the same without giving up a percentage to agencies or managers. From understanding sponsor goals to crafting irresistible pitches and maximizing negotiation leverage, this episode is packed with actionable insights for anyone looking to monetize their platform through strategic partnerships! What we discuss with Justin: + Turning free products into paid deals + Building a $5M brand partnership business + Why most creators don't need managers + Understanding sponsor goals (ARC framework) + Pricing based on awareness vs. conversions + Negotiation strategies that increase payouts + The DUE rule: deliverables, usage, exclusivity + Crafting pitches with the ROPE method + How small creators can land sponsors + Transitioning from one-off deals to retainers Thank you, Justin! Check out Creator Wizard at CreatorWizard.com. Subscribe to Justin's newsletter. Buy a copy of Sponsor Magnet. Listen to Sponsor Magnet. Follow Justin on Instagram, LinkedIn, TikTok, Twitter, and YouTube. Watch the video podcast of this episode! To get access to our FREE Business Training course go to MillionaireUniversity.com/training. And follow us on: Instagram Facebook Tik Tok Youtube Twitter To get exclusive offers mentioned in this episode and to support the show, visit millionaireuniversity.com/sponsors. Want to hear from more incredible entrepreneurs? Check out all of our interviews here! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
About this EpisodeThis episode is a little different from the usual Think Like a Game Designer conversation. Instead of a freeform discussion, I came prepared with a curated list of questions to guide the conversation, giving us a structured look into Jordan's creative process, his philosophies on innovation, and the lessons he's learned over decades of building worlds. The result is a fast-paced, insight-packed episode that feels like sitting in on a masterclass in game design.About Jordan WeismanJordan Weisman is a legendary figure in interactive entertainment, whose career spans tabletop games, video games, theme parks, and beyond. As the creator of Battletech, Shadowrun, and Crimson Skies, and the founder of iconic companies like FASA and WizKids, Jordan has shaped generations of players and creators alike. His work is defined by boundless curiosity, fearless experimentation, and a lifelong commitment to collaborative storytelling.In this episode, Jordan and I explore what it means to think small, fail boldly, and keep learning no matter how much success you've had. We discuss how curiosity drives innovation, why emotional courage is more important than financial risk, and how respect—for yourself, your team, and your audience—is at the heart of great creative work. Whether you're just starting your design journey or looking to rekindle your passion after decades in the industry, Jordan's insights offer a masterclass in staying creative for life.Think Like A Game Designer is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.Justin's QuestionsWhat's something that you're passionate about outside of your career, and what do you love about it? (00:01:33)* During the pandemic, he rediscovered model building and diorama crafting, a childhood hobby that brings him therapeutic joy.* He enjoys it because it's tangible, visual storytelling where you can actually see progress, a much different process than game design, which often feels abstract or slow.What do you love about that kind of model building and creating? (00:04:05)* It aligns with Jordan's love of world-building and storytelling when creating small, detailed scenes that tell a story visually.* It's satisfying because each session produces visible progress, reinforcing creativity and immersion.What is advice that you would give to someone that's just starting out in your industry? (00:04:06)* Think small. Beginners often aim for massive projects like the ones they admire.* Start with something you can finish using your own limited resources.* Completion and execution teach more than ideas ever will.* Focus on learning through doing, not imagining.Now let's flip to the other side of the equation: what do you see as an important lesson that industry veterans need to learn? Or put another way, what advice do you think your older self might give to you? (00:06:30) * Avoid hubris. Experience can blind you. Everything you know might be wrong.* Listen to young minds. Youth brings creativity because it hasn't learned what's supposedly impossible.* Over time, past failures make people too cautious; veterans must keep their beginner's mindset.* Innovation demands courage to look foolish publicly; fear of embarrassment kills creativity.* Stay humble, keep experimenting, and reassess old assumptions regularly.Are there any practices or rituals or ways that you try to keep yourself in that beginner's mind? How can one get the advantages of experience and minimize the disadvantages? (00:08:09)* You must be willing to “go face first into the mud.”* As he said in the previous question, public embarrassment is the price of innovation.* Surround yourself with young thinkers, question assumptions, and resist dismissing ideas based on past failures.* Always check whether past lessons still apply, because markets and contexts change. Jordan gives an example of a failed company born from his overconfidence, where he didn't re-research the market because he assumed he already knew it.What do you consider the most important skills to cultivate for your profession, and how do you cultivate these skills? (00:15:13)* Endless curiosity: Study adjacent fields like comics, fiction, tech—anything that feeds creative cross-pollination.* Build a box: Instead of “thinking outside the box,” define constraints clearly to evaluate ideas. For example: He designed Mage Knight by creating a checklist of problems (ease of entry, low cost, retailer needs) and solving within that “box.”* He values self-education: when he didn't know toy manufacturing, he paid a small company to teach him the process.So let's get to the areas where the industry or you have been dead wrong. What common advice do you hear about your industry that is dead? (00:24:26)* “Nothing is ever dead.” Genres, mechanics, and IPs always come back (vinyl, RPGs, etc.) * When people say something's over, it's actually ready for reinvention.* He used to believe in-person collaboration was essential, but remote work proved him wrong.* He often misjudged products (like thinking Funko Pops would flop).* Absorb wisdom but not edicts.* Success and failure are cyclical, making timing and humility matter more than certainty.What books, articles, or learning resources have had the biggest impact on you? And if there are any key takeaways that stuck with you that come to mind? (00:30:53)* Mentions Reed Hastings' book (Netflix culture) and Creativity, Inc. by Ed Catmull (Pixar). The value here is the small-team principles and leadership lessons, though he's skeptical of the “find five geniuses” model.* His biggest lessons came from mentors, not books: Mark Miller (creator of Traveller): taught him kindness and professionalism. His father, Mort Weissman: joined FASA, ran the business side, and kept it alive.* He emphasizes mentorship, respect, and kindness as lasting business principles.What is the right way to find a partner? (00:33:14)* Finding a partner is like finding a life mate: talk about goals, work habits, expectations.* Negotiate the “prenup” early, meaning you should decide how you'll split if things go wrong.* Avoid the naive approach he took (asking friends at the table).What about systems, software, and tools that have had a big impact on your workflow?(00:38:18)* Internal tool: his “box” process for evaluating ideas.* Software: Slack (no internal email, all communication centralized), Google Docs (collaboration), ClickUp/Jira (task tracking).* Avoid “Not Invented Here” syndrome: don't build tools you can buy.* Focus on your core innovation; outsource or use existing solutions for everything else.* Reuse mechanics unless your innovation demands new ones.* Let your team choose tools bottom-up instead of enforcing top-down.What's your favorite project, and what lessons did you learn from it? (00:45:46)* His favorite is always the one he's working on now, but emotionally, Shadowrun and Crimson Skies stand out. Shadowrun came from trying to differentiate from Cyberpunk and combining fantasy with cyberpunk via the Mayan calendar. Crimson Skies was born from personal burnout after his wife pushed him to rediscover his passion. It led to reinvention and eventually Microsoft's acquisition of his company.* His lesson here is that passion and reinvention are crucial; listen to loved ones and know when to move on from stale success.You can find the previous episode with Jordan below: This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit justingarydesign.substack.com/subscribe
In Episode 14 of Negotiate X in Rewind, hosts Nolan Martin and Aram Donigian explore the art of uncovering interests in negotiation and why it's essential for lasting success. They break down how identifying both organizational and individual motivations—beyond surface-level positions—leads to stronger collaboration and smarter outcomes. Using real-world examples, they illustrate how strategic, operational, and personal goals intertwine in every deal. From managing risks and relationships to understanding human needs through Maslow's hierarchy, the episode reveals how empathy and curiosity transform negotiations into meaningful, mutually beneficial problem-solving conversations rather than positional battles.
In this in-depth episode, Rebecca Zung dive into the ultimate guide for handling narcissists in mediation, divorce, and custody battles. You'll learn exactly how to prepare, protect yourself, and win against manipulative tactics used by narcissists in court. From legal leverage to emotional boundaries and self-empowerment, this masterclass breaks down every stage of the fight — and how to reclaim your power with clarity, strategy, and strength. What You'll Learn How to Handle Narcissists in Mediation and Legal Battles — preparation, strategy, leverage, and negotiation psychology. How narcissists distort communication — twisting words, gaslighting, and manipulating evidence to gain control. Essential leverage techniques that force narcissists to settle or comply without giving in to emotional games. Why emotional control and confidence are your greatest weapons during mediation or court. What to do when narcissists violate court orders or ignore agreements — effective legal steps that hold them accountable. Understanding narcissistic supply and how to cut it off to regain your power. Why early mediation, collaborative law, or “being nice” doesn't work with narcissists. Documentation mastery — the exact kind of evidence judges believe and how to build your case strategically. Rebecca Zung's SLAY Method — Strategy, Leverage, Anticipate, and focusing on YOU to turn the tables on narcissists. The truth about the family court system — how to recognize bias, expose manipulation, and fight smartly for your rights. Real success stories and tactical steps to outsmart narcissists legally and emotionally. Key Takeaways Mediation with narcissists isn't about fairness — it's about leverage and boundaries. The courtroom is a psychological battlefield — preparation and emotional neutrality win. Narcissists will delay, obstruct, and twist facts — but documentation, calm strategy, and a strong legal team turn the tables. Your recovery and mindset are just as vital as your legal approach — clarity equals power. #RebeccaZung #DrRamani #NarcissistDivorce #NarcissisticAbuseRecovery #NarcissistMediation #HighConflictDivorce #FamilyCourt #CustodyBattle #NarcissistLaw #NarcissisticParent #LegalStrategy #SLAYProgram #NarcissistLeverage #DivorceRecovery #TraumaBond #NarcissisticAbuse #NarcissismAwareness #EmotionalAbuse #PsychologicalAbuse #Boundaries #CovertNarcissist #OvertNarcissist #NarcissistSurvivor
For many years, researchers categorized sex as a biological drive like thirst, hunger, sleep or temperature control. But the question lingered, “what if you don't have sex? What will happen to you?” Unlike thirst or hunger, individuals will survive without sex, says Dr. Adrienne Rowland, an AASECT-certified sex therapist specializing in sexual health and LGBTQIA+ affirming care. During this Smart Sex, Smart Love podcast, she discusses the difference between spontaneous desire and responsive desire and why both are normal, how to manage desire discrepancies, and what to do about male patriarchy systems that remain present today. “When I talk with couples, many still follow the traditional male patriarchy system: a man's sexual desire is a woman's responsibility,” Dr. Rowland finds. “In our patriarchal society, women often grow up learning that sex is not for them; it is their role to pleasure their male partner. It is important to empower primarily women to feel confident with their body autonomy, and to not feel guilty for saying ‘no' to a sexual encounter they don't want,” she asserts. “We are responsible for our own pleasure. Normalize it. Negotiate your desires, and the result will be very freeing,” Dr. Rowland announces. “No one should give permission to explore their own pleasure.”
In this powerful interview, Rebecca Zung and Dr. John Gray dive deep into the biological and emotional dynamics between men and women. Learn how hormones, communication styles, and emotional needs shape love, attraction, and long-term connection. Discover how women can reclaim balance, reduce stress, and reignite polarity through simple yet transformative relationship techniques based on John Gray's groundbreaking Mars and Venus principles. Description: Discover the truth about how hormones impact attraction, communication, and emotional connection between men and women Learn why asking men how they feel can actually hurt relationships — and what to do instead Understand how testosterone and estrogen shape stress, happiness, and intimacy John Gray reveals how women can reduce overwhelm by receiving help and embracing their feminine energy Why men feel successful when appreciated, and women feel loved when heard How to use small, confident requests to raise estrogen and rebuild connection Explore the concept of the “Venus Talk” — a 10-minute exercise that deepens love without blame or fixing Understand why postmenopausal women often feel more independent and how hormone balance shifts emotional needs The biology behind polarity, passion, and why attraction fades if not consciously nurtured How modern relationships can thrive by honoring differences instead of resenting them Insights from John Gray's books Be Happy With or Without a Man and Men Are from Mars, Women Are from Venus: For Women Only Learn about his Mars Venus Heart Space App and new six-book series on modern love and connection Hosted by Rebecca Zung, attorney, bestselling author, and narcissism negotiation expert #RebeccaZung #JohnGray #MarsAndVenus #RelationshipAdvice #WomensEmpowerment #FeminineEnergy #MasculineEnergy #EmotionalIntelligence #CommunicationInRelationships #HormoneHealth #LoveAndConnection #BeHappyWithOrWithoutAMan #MenAreFromMarsWomenAreFromVenus #RelationshipCoaching #RebeccaZungInterview
Let's go back to macroeconomics class! In this episode of Financial Clarity for Doctors, hosts Rachelle Vanderzanden and Corey Janoff discuss the basics of inflation. Why do prices continue increasing? We'd rather pay 25 cents for milk too! Unfortunately, capitalism and supply and demand make price stability pretty much impossible. And that's not always a bad thing. Some Basics on Inflation: Generally measured in the United States by something called the Consumer Price Index (CPI) which tracks the costs of goods and services. Sky-rocketed coming out of covid times with supply chain issues, cheap money (low interest rates), a tight labor market which generally means higher pay, and stimulus funds. Lots of demand because people had money, but supply was low, so prices went up. Now hovering around 3%, but still dealing with the effects of large increases over the past few years. Wages generally increase over time, which is another upward pressure on price through supply and demand. The Federal Reserve has a dual mandate to keep inflation in check and keep unemployment low. That does NOT mean zero inflation. They have a target inflation rate of 2%. One of the biggest ways they do this is by increasing interest rates, therefore making it harder for people to purchase things they would need to finance. To protect against inflation: Keep short-term savings in something like a high-interest savings account where you can earn interest. Negotiate pay increases based on your cost of living. Retirement money should be invested so that it has a chance to grow and outpace inflation – although we know this is not a guarantee, inflation is the bigger risk to long-term money. Inflation is a part of the global economy! We can't get rid of it, so the best we can do is protect our personal finances as best we can from its effects. Listen to the full episode to hear more. For more financial planning tips from Corey and Rachelle, you can reach out to them at podcast@thefinitygroup.com. They would love to hear your questions and ideas for upcoming episodes. Discussions in this show should not be construed as specific recommendations or investment advice. Always consult with your investment professional before making important investment decisions. Securities offered through Registered Representatives of Cambridge Investment Research, Inc., a broker-dealer, member FINRA/SIPC. Advisory services offered through Cambridge Investment Research Advisors, Inc., a Registered Investment Adviser. Finity Group, LLC and Cambridge are not affiliated. Cambridge does not offer tax or legal advice.
Send us a textSign up for one of our negotiation courses at ShikinaNegotiationAcademy.comThanks for listening to Negotiation with Alice! Please subscribe and connect with us on LinkedIn and Instagram!
Another Monday means it's time for another installment of our “5 Ways To Monday” series… Today Rich is talking about negotiating those media deals. This topic is on his mind because he's been working with some of Level 10's staff on media negotiations recently… and he made a few notes on some things he's been helping them with. So it's not exactly like being a fly on the wall for a personal training from Rich–but it's pretty darn close.
Want to know what actually makes a narcissist panic? This episode shows you the exact pressure points narcissists can't handle and how to use them safely and strategically. We'll cover calm power moves like no emotional engagement, boundary setting, and exposure-based leverage so you stop reacting and start leading. You'll learn: ✅ Why supply drives everything they do and how to turn it off ✅ Panic triggers: brutal honesty, pushback, loss of control, exposure ✅ Seven tactics to make them lose control without losing yours ✅ What truly drives them crazy and how to protect your peace ✅ How to convert triggers into leverage using the SLAY method
Do you get nervous when talking about your prices, fees or negotiating a higher salary?Tune in to my conversation with John Gates and learn:How to negotiate your salary/fee.How to fight the anxiety when negotiating higher salary or fee.How to answer the questions about salary or fee expectations.What “silence vacuum” is and why it's important.How to understand the psychology of negotiations. The biggest mistake people make during negotiations. John Gates is an author and founder of Salary Coach, where he helps C-suite executives and senior leaders negotiate higher compensation packages without risking their job offers or future relationships. John's unique approach, born from his extensive experience in corporate recruiting, consistently helps his clients secure 10-20% more in their pay packages, even in challenging job markets.Get John's book "Act Your Wage": https://www.amazon.com/Act-Your-Wage-possible-package-ebook/dp/B0CBGL636VConnect with John:https://salary.coach/https://www.amazon.com/Act-Your-Wage-possible-package-ebook/dp/B0CBGL636Vhttps://www.linkedin.com/in/johngates-salarycoach/Email: John@Salary.coach
History doesn't always repeat, but it echoes loudly. In today's episode, "Who Gets to Decide What Your Labor is Worth?", host Jacquette dives into the overlooked legacy of Black labor activists who fought for equity while being denied it themselves. Despite pushing for justice for all workers, they were excluded from the very movements they helped build, leading to the creation of The Colored National Labor Union (CNLU) in 1869. Through this retelling, Jacquette implores listeners to rethink pricing and pay—not just as numbers, but as acts of self-advocacy. Whether you're negotiating a raise or setting your rates, claiming your worth is a radical, personal form of activism. And no one is better positioned to lead that charge than you.Also check out: Pricing Made Human Experiencewww.jacquettetimmons.comwww.jacquettetimmons.com/digital-productswww.instagram.com/jacquettemtimmonsBuyMeACoffee.com/JacquetteSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
In this episode of Negotiate X in Rewind, hosts Aram Donigian and Nolan Martin sit down with negotiation strategist Keld Jensen to explore the intersection of Trust, Strategy & the Science of Negotiation. Keld reveals why negotiation isn't instinct—it's a learned discipline grounded in research and structure. Additionally, he introduces his SMARTnership approach, explaining how trust, clear strategy, and measurable value creation transform deals into true collaborations. From redefining partnership to using data-driven insights that uncover hidden value, this episode challenges professionals to approach negotiation scientifically—balancing analytical rigor with human connection for lasting results.
Summary In this episode, Elizabeth Dodson and John Bodrozic share their harrowing experience with a water damage emergency in their home. They recount the chaotic moments when they were awakened by screaming smoke detectors, leading to the discovery of water pouring from their light fixtures. The couple discusses the immediate actions they took, including shutting off the water, documenting the damage, and navigating the insurance claims process. They emphasize the importance of preparation, teamwork, and understanding the intricacies of home insurance and repair processes. Throughout the conversation, they provide valuable tips for homeowners on how to handle similar emergencies effectively. Takeaways Always know where your water shutoff valve is located. Document all damage with photos and videos immediately. Have a go-bag ready for emergencies. Teamwork is essential during a crisis; divide tasks effectively. Understand your insurance policy and what it covers. Water remediation is crucial to prevent further damage. Be prepared for the repair process to take time. Negotiate with contractors to ensure all needs are met. Stay organized and keep communication open with all parties involved. Invest in smart home technology to prevent future leaks. Sound bites "We woke up to this screaming alarm." "We had a huge water leak issue." "Teamwork makes the dream work." Chapters 00:00 The Awakening: A Morning of Chaos 13:01 The Response: Quick Thinking and Action 24:01 The Aftermath: Navigating Insurance and Remediation 28:36 Understanding Insurance Responsibilities 31:01 Navigating Temporary Housing Solutions 34:02 The Plumbing Dilemma 37:31 Identifying Defective Piping 40:42 Investing in Smart Home Solutions 45:32 Managing the Claims Process 51:35 Contracting and Negotiation Strategies 56:57 Final Thoughts on Home Repairs
With the recent student loan repayment changes, many veterinarians are facing a much bigger bill than before.Whether you're moving from SAVE to PAYE, preparing for Old IBR in a couple of years, or switching plans and suddenly seeing your payment double, the jump can feel overwhelming. You're not alone in this — and you can prepare.In this episode, I'll walk you through five key steps to help you get ready for higher student loan payments:Know your next steps: Which plan are you eligible for, and what payment can you expect? If you're married, could you save money by switching your tax filing status? Get clear on your budget: Use Monarch Money, a spreadsheet, or whatever works - awareness is key. Build breathing room: Practice your higher payment now to avoid a cash-flow shock later. Be intentional with your compensation: Negotiate for higher pay, stronger production, or better benefits. And if you're picking up extra shifts, make sure they're in alignment with your goals — not just a reaction to student loan stress. Shift your perspective: Remember, the COVID pause was unusual — higher payments are tough, but you can adapt. If you've been feeling stressed or blindsided by your new payment, this episode will give you both the tools and perspective to move forward.Mentioned in this episode:Episode 67: What the new Student Loan Bill Means for VeterinariansDebt-Free Vets Facebook GroupInterested in vet-specific financial planning? Schedule a free intro call or email meredith@allvetfinancial.com
Negotiate another league-winning deal with our top 6 fantasy football trade targets to buy-low and sell-high before Week 6 of the 2025 NFL season! Can Jacksonville Jaguars WR Travis Hunter be the hero your roster needs? Plus, is it time to cash out on Dallas Cowboys WR George Pickens? Seth, Eric & Steve return to the auction house on a new edition of tbe podcast! ⏰ Time Stamps: 00:00:00 Introduction 00:03:33 IBT Football Family Promo 00:04:08 PropDecks Promo 00:05:24 Front & Center: Week 6 Fantasy Football Trade Targets 00:06:08 Sell: Tee Higgins (WR, Cincinnati Bengals) 00:07:27 Sell: Ja'Marr Chase (WR, Cincinnati Bengals) 00:14:16 Sell: George Pickens (WR, Dallas Cowboys) 00:17:23 Sell: Rico Dowdle (RB, Carolina Panthers) 00:19:14 Buy: Travis Hunter (WR, Jacksonville Jaguars) 00:24:21 Sell: Rico Dowdle (RB, Carolina Panthers) 00:28:25 Listener Questions No. 1 00:36:04 In the Scope: Week 6 Waiver Wire Stashes 00:36:33 Mason Taylor (TE, New York Jets) | 8.0% 00:37:52 AJ Barner (TE, Seattle Seahawks) | 1.o% 00:40:40 Kyle Monangai (RB, Chicago Bears) | 3.7% 00:42:25 Listener Questions No. 2 00:51:17 Between Bets: NFL Week 6 Picks & Predictions 00:53:51 Chicago Bears +4.5 vs. Washington Commanders (-105 via DraftKings) 00:55:09 Cleveland Browns +6.5 vs. Pittsburgh Steelers (-110 via Fanatics) 00:56:48 Dallas Cowboys -3.5 vs. Carolina Panthers (-105 via DraftKings) 00:58:23 Jacksonville Jaguars -1.5 vs Seattle Seahawks (-108 via DraftKings) 00:59:33 Los Angeles Chargers vs. Miami Dolphins OVER 43.5 (-105 via ESPN BET) 01:00:38 Denver Broncos vs. New York Jets OVER 43.5 (-105 via ESPN BET) 01:01:37 Philadelphia Eagles vs. New York Giants OVER 40.5 (-112 via DraftKings) 01:03:30 Seattle Seahawks ML (+105 ESPN BET) vs. Jacksonville Jaguars 01:06:09 Tennessee Titans ML (+195 via DraftKings) vs. Las Vegas Raiders 01:08:06 Josh Jacobs Over Rushing Attempts 01:08:43 Travis Hunter Over Receptions 01:09:30 Tyler Warren Over Receptions 01:10:11 Puka Nacua Over Receptions 01:10:53 Touchdown Calls of the Week & Leaderboard Update 01:12:01 De'Von Achane Anytime TD (+105 via DraftKings) 01:12:25 Calvin Ridley Anytime TD (+245 via DraftKings) 01:12:40 Puka Nacua or Davante Adams Anytime TD (NL) 01:13:07 Saquon Barkley Anytime TD (-160 via FanDuel) 01:13:53 Tetairoa McMillan Anytime TD (+175 via DraftKings) 01:15:23 Hassan Haskins Anytime TD (+120 via bet365) 01:16:23 Listener Questions No. 2 01:21:35 Plugs + Outro
A federal judge allows the Trump administration's National Guard deployment to Chicago to move forward as state officials decry it as political overreach. Israeli and Hamas officials meet in Egypt to finalize Trump's proposed peace deal on the two-year anniversary of the October 7 terror attack. Paramount acquires Bari Weiss's Free Press in a $150 million deal and names her Editor-in-Chief of CBS News, signaling a major editorial shift. The Supreme Court declines to hear Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal, effectively ending her bid to overturn her sex-trafficking conviction. Geviti: Go to https://gogeviti.com/megyn and get 20% off with code MEGYN. Masa Chips: Get 25% off your first order | Use code MK at https://MASAChips.com/MK Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
This is a fan fav episode. What up homie! I've got a powerful two-part episode that's going to expose everything you need to know before you negotiate your time, your affection, or your peace of mind with a narcissist. Today we have the top globally recognized attorney who specializes in narcissistic negotiations joining us to spill the tea. It's not enough to just spot red flags in your personal and professional lives, I want you to understand the danger of missing them and Rebecca Zung is delivering what you need to beat the narcissist at home and in the office. Spot the narcissists hiding among us and get what you need out of them on your terms in the first part of today's episode: *Turn the tables and learn how to ETHICALLY manipulate the manipulator *Discover the narcissist's scam that's leaving high-value women like yourself feeling undervalued and worthless. *Genius phrases that'll disarm your narcissist, protect you, and give you the leverage you need to beat them at their own game. After this power packed episode you'll know the secret to beating narcissists and getting them to shrink in any situation. All of this is unfolding now! This is for my homies aiming for success and balance in life. Learn how to navigate a toxic partner at home and in the corporate world, because when you know the game, you can actually win! Check out Rebecca's book, Slay the Bully, How to Negotiate with a Narcissist & Win: https://www.amazon.com/SLAY-Bully-How-Negotiate-Narcissist/dp/1637586868 Original air date: 1-5-2023 REBECCA ZUNG QUOTES: “You have to be really clear about what you want in a negotiation or you're not going to be able to get there.” “All narcissists are driven by one thing and one thing only. That is narcissistic supply.” “Not only is the narcissist not rational and reasonable when you're dealing with them in negotiation, also the target person has been traumatized too…” Follow Rebecca Zung: Website: https://www.rebeccazung.com/ YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@RebeccaZungEsq Twitter: https://twitter.com/rebeccazung Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/rebeccazung/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rebeccazung/ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Hey guys, what you are about to listen to is basically a “what if” Japan performed Hokushin-ron instead of Nanshin-ron, ie: What if Japan invaded the USSR during WW2? Before I jump into it I just want to thank all of you that signed up for the patreon, you guys are awesome. Please leave a comment on this episode to let me know what more you want to hear about in the future. With all of that said and done lets jump right into it. Part 1 The Geopolitical context Ok so, one of the questions I get the most is, what if Japan invaded the USSR. I've actually already tackled this subject, albeit lightly with Cody from AlternatehistoryHub and once with my friend Eric. Its too complicated to give a real answer, a lot of this is guess work, though I really will try to provide hard numbers. I think off the bat something needs to be made clear since we are dealing with alternate history. I am not doing a “what if Japan developed completely different, or what if the IJA got their way in the early 1930's” no no, this is going to be as realistic as possible…even though this is batshit crazy. Japan faced the decision of whether to go to war with the USSR in 1941 during Operation Barbarossa. They held meetings, made plans, and ultimately it was decided they would not engage the Soviets. Our scenario will follow exactly what they did to a T, but when the made the decision not to go to war, we will see them go to war. Now before I jump into our this timeline, I think its very important to explain the actual situation Japan faced in 1941. There were two major strategies that emerged during the 1930's within the Japanese military. Many junior officers in the IJA favored the Hokushin-ron “northern strike” strategy against the USSR. Many officers in the IJN with some in the IJA favored the Nanshin-ron “southern strike” strategy, to seize the resource rich dutch east indies by invading Southeast Asia and the Pacific. The idea of Hokushin-ron was to perform an invasion into Southern Siberia and outer mongolia ending around Lake Baikal where they would set up defenses. They had already tried to establish this during the Russian civil war as part of the Siberian Intervention, but failed to create a buffer state. From 1935-1939 there were 108 border clashes between the USSR and Japan. In 1938 one of these border clashes turned into quite a catastrophe, it was called the battle of Lake Khasan. The Soviets suffered nearly 800 deaths, more than 3000 wounded, perhaps nearly 50 tanks were destroyed with another 100 damaged. The Japanese suffered about 600 deaths with 2500 wounded. The result ultimately was a ceasefire, but for the Kwantung army it seemed to them like a victory. In May of 1939 they had a much larger and more famous battle known as the battle of Khalkhin Gol. During the early part of the battle the IJA sent 80 tanks crossing over Khalkhin Gol, driving the Soviets back towards Baintsagan Hill. Zhukov was waiting for the attack and sent 450 tanks and armored cars unsupported by infantry to attack the IJA from three sides. The IJA were practically encircled and lost half their armored units as they struggled to fight back as it withdrew. The two armies spared for the next 2 weeks along the east bank of the Khalkhin Gol. Problem was the Japanese were having issues getting their supplies to the area as they lacked motor transport while Zhukov whose army was over 460 miles away from its base of supply had 2600 trucks supplying them. On july 23rd the Japanese launched attacks supported by artillery and within two days they had consumed half their ammunition stores. The situation was terrible, they suffered 5000 casualties and made little progress breaking the Soviet lines. Zhukov then unleashed an offensive on august 20th using over 4000 trucks to transport supplies from Chita base. He assembled around 500 tanks, 550 fighters and bombers and his 50,000 infantry supported by armored cars. This mechanized force attacked the Japanese first using artillery and the aircraft as his armor and infantry crossed the river. The IJA were quickly flanked by the fast moving Soviet armor and encircled by August 25th. The IJA made attempts to break out of the encirclement but failed. They refused to surrender despite overwhelming artillery and aerial bombardment; by the 31st the Japanese forces on the Mongolian side of the border were destroyed. The Japanese suffered nearly 20,000 casualties, the lost 162 aircraft, 29 tanks, 7 tankettes, 72 artillery pieces a large number of vehicles. The Soviets took a heavy hit also suffering almost 25,000 casualties, 250 aircraft, 250 tanks, 133 armored cars, almost 100 artillery pieces, hundreds of vehicles. While these numbers make it seem the Japanese did a great job, you need to consider what each party was bringing to this fight. The Japanese brought roughly 30,000 men, 80 tanks and tankettes, 400 aircraft, 300 artillery pieces, 1000 trucks. The Soviets brought nearly 75,000 men, 550 tanks, 900 aircraft, 634 artillery pieces, 4000 trucks. There are some sources that indicate the IJA brought as many artillery rounds as they could muster from Japan, Manchuria and Korea, roughly 100,000 rounds for the operation. The Soviets fired 100,000 rounds per day. A quick look at wikipedia numbers, yes I know its a no no, but sometimes its good for quick perspectives show: USSR: Bomber sorties 2,015, fighter sorties 18,509; 7.62 mm machine gun rounds fired 1,065,323; 20 mm (0.80 in) cannon rounds expended 57,979; bombs dropped 78,360 (1,200 tons). Japan: Fighter/bomber sorties 10,000 (estimated); 7.7 mm (0.30 in) machine gun rounds fired 1.6 million; bombs dropped 970 tons. What I am trying to say is there was an enormous disparity in military production. And this is not just limited to numbers but quality. After the battle the Japanese made significant reforms. They increased tank production from 500 annually to 1200. The Japanese funded research into new anti-tank guns, such as the Type 1 47 mm. They mounted this gun to their Type 97 Chi-Ha tanks, the new standard medium tank of the IJA. Because of the tremendous defeat to Soviet armor they send General Yamashita to Germany to learn everything he could about tank tactics. But they simply could not produce enough tanks to ever hope to match 10% of the USSR. The Soviets had mostly been using T-26's, BT-5's and BT-7's who were crudely made, but made en masse. The Japanese would find most of their tank models with less effective range, less armor and some with less penetration power. It took the Japanese a hell of a lot more time to produce tanks, they were simply not on par with the Soviets in quantity or quality. Their tank tactics, albeit improved via Yamashita after 1939, were still nothing compared to the Soviets. The major outcome of the battle of Lake Khasan and Khalkhin Gol was the abandonment of the hokushin-ron strategy and adoption of the nanshin-ron strategy. But, that didnt mean Japan did not have a plan in case they had to go to war with the USSR. Part 2 Kantōgun Tokushu Enshū Kantōgun Tokushu Enshū or the Kwantung Army Special Maneuvers was an operational plan created by the General Staff of the IJA for an invasion of the Russian Far East to capitalize on Operation Barbarossa. Here our story truly begin. Between 1938-1939 the IJA General Staff and Kwantung Army formed two “Hachi-Go” plans. Variants A and B examined the possibility of an all out war with the USSR beginning in 1943. In both plans they expected to be facing 60 Soviet divisions, while they could deliver 50 divisions, delivered incrementally from China and Japan. Plan A called for attacks across the eastern and northern borders of Manchuria while maintaining a defensive stance in the west. Plan B, much more ambitious, called for striking into the vast steppe between the Great Khingan Mountains and Lake Baikal, hoping to cut off the trans-siberian railway. If this was done successfully it was believed the whole of European Russia would be doomed to be defeated in detail. Defeated in detail means to divide and conquer. This battle would take place over 5000 kilometers with Japan's final objective being to advance 1200 km into the USSR. That dwarves Operation Barbarossa in distance, let that sink in. Both plans faced impossible odds. First of all the railway networks in Manchuria were not sufficiently expanded for such far reaching offensives, especially for plan B. Furthermore the 50 divisions required for them would be impossible to come by, since 1937 Japan was bogged down in a war with China. When Japan went to war with the west in 1941 she had 51 divisions. She left the base minimum in China, 35 divisions and tossed nearly 20 into southeast asia and the pacific. On top of not having the men, the IJA estimated a fleet of 200,000 vehicles would be necessary to sustain an offensive to Lake Baikal. That was twice the number of military vehicles Japan had at any given time. After the battle of Khalkhin Gol, plan B was completely abandoned. Planning henceforth focused solely on the northern and eastern fronts with any western advance being limited in scope. Now Japan formed a neutrality pact with the USSR because of her defeat at Khalkhin Gol and Molotov Ribbentrop pact between Germany and the USSR. The Molotov Ribbentrop Pact came as a bitter and complete surprise to Japan. It pushed Japan to fully adopt the Nanshin-ron strategy and this began with her invasion of French IndoChina, which led the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and United States to embargo her. The Netherlands Dutch East Indies refused to sell oil to Japan, the UK refused to sell oil from Burma and the US gradually cut off selling oil to Japan, with her oil exports alone being 80% of Japans supply, the rest from the Dutch east indies. The United States also placed an embargo on scrap-metal shipments to Japan and closed the Panama Canal to Japanese shipping. 74.1% of Japan's scrap iron came from the United States in 1938, and 93% of Japan's copper in 1939. Other things like Rubber and tin were also off the table, as this was mostly acquired from British held Malaya and the Dutch East Indies. Now the crux of everything is the China War. Japan was stuck, she needed to win, in order to win she needed the resources she was being denied. The only logical decision was to attack the places with these resources. Thus until 1941, Japan prepared to do just that, investing in the Navy primarily. Then in June of 1941, Hitler suddenly informs the Japanese that he is going to invade the USSR. The Japanese were shocked and extremely angry, they nearly left the Tripartite Pact over the issue. This unprecedented situation that ushered in the question, what should Japan do? There were those like Foreign Minister Yosuke Matsuoka who argued they must abandon the neutrality pact and launch a simultaneous offensive with the Germans against the USSR. The IJA favored this idea….because obviously it would see them receiving more funding as the IJN was currently taking more and more of it for the Nanshin-ron plans. But this is not a game of hearts of Iron IV, the Japanese government had to discuss and plan if they would invade the USSR….and boy it took awhile. I think a lot of you will be very disappointed going forward, but there is no grand unleashing of a million Japanese across the borders into the Soviet Far East, in the real world there is something called logistics and politics. The Japanese military abided by a flexible response policy, like many nations do today. Theres was specifically called the Junbi Jin Taisei or “preparatory formation setup”. Japan would only go to war with the USSR if favorable conditions were met. So in our timeline the Junbi Jin encountered its first test on June 24th when the IJA/IJN helped a conference in the wake of operation barbarossa. A compromise was made allowing the IJA to prepare an invasion plan if it did not impede on the nanshin-ron plans. There was those in the IJA who argued they should invade the USSR whether conditions were favorable or not, there were those who only wanted to invade if it looked like the USSR was on the verge of collapse. One thing agreed upon was if Japan unleashed a war with the USSR, the hostilities needed to be over by mid-October because the Siberian climate would hit winter and it would simply be impossible to continue. The IJA needed 60-7 days to complete operational preparations and 6-8 weeks to defeat the Soviets within the first phase of the offensive. Here is a breakdown of what they were thinking: 28 June: Decide on mobilization 5 July: Issue mobilization orders 20 July: Begin troop concentration 10 August: Decide on hostilities 24 August: Complete readiness stance 29 August: Concentrate two divisions from North China in Manchuria, bringing the total to 16 5 September: Concentrate four further divisions from the homeland, bringing the total to 22; complete combat stance 10 September (at latest): Commence combat operations 15 October: Complete first phase of war The plan called for 22 divisions (might I add my own calculations of 20 divisions were pretty spot on), with roughly 850,000 men, including Manchukuo allies, supported by 800,000 tons of shipping. The Japanese hoped the Soviets would toss at least half their forces in the Far East, perhaps 2/3rd of their armor and aircraft against the Germans giving them a 2-1 superiority. Even the 22 divisions was questionable, many in the war ministry thought only 16 divisions could be spared for such a venture, something only suitable for mop up operations in the aftermath of a German victory along the eastern front. It was clear to all, Japan needed perfect conditions to even think about performing such a thing. The War hawks who still sought to perform Hokushin-ron tried to persaude Hideki Tojo on july 5th to go through with a new plan using a total of 25 divisions. This plan designated “Kantogun Tokushu Enshu or Kantokuen” would involve 2 phases, a buildup and readiness phase and an offensive phase. On July 7th they went to Hirohito for his official sanction for the build up. Hirohito questioned everything, but gradually relented to it. The plan was nearly identical to the former plans, banking on the Soviets being unable to reinforce the Far East because of Germany's progress. The level of commitment was scaled down somewhat, but still enormous. Again a major looming issue was the Manchurian railways that would need to be expanded to accomodate the movement of men and supplies. This meant the construction of port facilities, military barracks, hospitals and such. Kantokuen would begin with a initial blow against the Ussuri front, targeting Primorye and would be followed up by a northern attack against Blagoveshchensk and Kuibyshevka. The 1st area army, 3rd and 20 armies with the 19th division of the Korean army would penetrade the border south of Lake Khanka to breach the main soviet defensive lines, thus threatening Vladivostok. The 5th army would strike south of Dalnerechensk to complete the isolation of the maritime province, sever the trans-sierian railway and block Soviet reinforcements. The 4th army would attack along the Amur river before helping out against Blagoveshchensk. Two reinofrced divisions would invade Sakhalin from land and sea. The second phase would see the capture of Khabarovsk, Komsomolsk, Skovorodino, Sovetskaya Gavan, and Nikolayevsk. Additionally, amphibious operations against Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky and other parts of the Kamchatka Peninsula were contemplated. It was agreed the operation could only afford 24 divisions, with 1,200,000 men, 35,000 vehicles, 500 tanks, 400,000 horses and 300,000 coolies. The deployment of thse forces would mean the western front facing Mongolia and the Trans-baikal region would be pretty much open, so delaying actions would have to be fought if the soviets performed a counter offensive there. Air forces were critical to the plan. They sought to dispatch up to roughly 2000 aircraft cooperating with 350 naval aircraft to launch a sudden strike against the Soviet Far East Air Force to knock them out early. The Soviet Far East had two prominent weaknesses to be exploited. Number 1 was Mongolia's 4500 km long horeshoe shaped border. Number 2 was its 100% dependency on European Russia to deliver men, food and war materials via the trans-siberian railway. Any disruption of the trans-siberian railway would prove fatal to the Soviet Far East. Now as for the Soviets. The 1930's and early 1940's saw the USSR take up a defensive policy, but retained offensive elecments as well. Even with the German invasion and well into 1942, the Soviets held a strategy of tossing back the IJA into Manchuria if attacked. The primary forces defending the Far east in 1941 were the Far Eastern and Trans-Baikal Fronts, under the command of Generals Iosif Apanasenko and Mikhail Kovalyov. The Trans-Baikal front held 9 divisions, including 2 armored, a mechanized brigade and a heavily fortified region west of the Oldoy River near Skovorodino had a garrison. The Far Eastern Front had 23 divisions including 3 armored, 4 brigades and 11 heavily fortified regions with garrisons including Vladivostok. Altogether they had 650,000 men, 5400 tanks, 3000 aircraft, 57,000 vehicles, 15,000 artillery pieces and nearly 100,000 horses. By 1942 the Vladivostok sector had 150 artillery pieces with 75 -356 mm calibers organized into 50 batteries. As you can imagine after Operation Barbarrosa was unleashed, things changed. From June to December, roughly 160,000 men, 3000 tanks, 2670 artillery pieces, 12,000 vehicles and perhaps 1800 aircraft were sent to deal with the Germans. Despite this, the Soviets also greatly expanded a buildup to match the apparent Japanese buildup in Manchuria. By July 22nd 1941 the Far Eastern and Trans-Baikal Fronts were to be raised by 1 million men for august. By December it was nearly 1.2 million. Even the Soviet Far East Navy saw an increase from 100,000 men to 170,000 led by Admiral Yumashev. The Soviet Mongolian allies were capable of manning about 80,000, though they lacked heavy equipment. Thus if this war broke out in September the Soviets and Mongolians would have just over a million men, with 2/3rds of them manning the Amur-Ussuri-Sakhalin front, the rest would defend Mongolia and the Trans-Baikal region. Even though the war against the Germans was dire, the Soviets never really gave up their prewar planning for how to deal with the Japanese. There would be an all-out defense over the border to prevent any breach of Soviet territory. The main effort would see the 1st and 25th armies holding a north-south axis between the Pacific ocean and Lake Khanka; the 35th army would defend Iman; the 15th and 2nd Red Banner armies would repel the Japanese over the Amur River; and other forces would try to hold out on Sakhalin, Kamchatka and the Pacific coast. The Soviets had constructed hundreds of fortified positions known as Tochkas along the border. Most of these were hexagonal concrete bunkers contained machine gun nests and 76 mm guns. The fortified regions I mentioned were strategically placed forcing the Japanese to overcome them via frontal attacks. This would require heavy artillery to overcome. Despite the great defensive lines, the Soviets did not intend to be passive and would launch counteroffensives. The Soviet air force and Navy would play an active role in defeating a Japanese invasion as well. The air force's objetice would be to destroy the Japanese air force in the air and on the ground, requiring tactical ground attack mission. They would also destroy key railways, bridges and airfields within Manchuria and Korea alongside intercepting IJN shipping. Strategic bombing against the home islands would be limited to under 30 DB-3's who could attack Tokyo, Yokosuka, Maizuru and Ominato. The Soviet Navy would help around the mouth of the Amur River, mine the Tatar Strait and try to hit any IJN ships landing men or materials across the Pacific Coasts. Japan would not be able to continue a land war with the USSR for very long. According to Japanese military records, in 1942 while at war they were required to produce 50 Kaisenbun. A Kaisenbun is a unit of measurement for ammunition needed for a single division to operate for 4 months. Annual production never surpassed 25 kaisenbun with 100 in reserve. General Shinichi Tanaka estimated for an operation against the USSR 3 Kaisenbun would be needed per divisions, thus a total of 72 would be assigned to 24 divisions. This effectively meant 2/3rds of Japans ammunition stockpile would be used on the initial strike against the USSR. Japan would have been extremely hard pressed to survive such a war cost for 2 years. Now in terms of equipment Japan had a lot of problems. During the border battles, Japanese artillery often found itself outranged and grossly under supplied compared to the Soviet heavier guns. Despite moving a lot of men and equipment to face the Germans, the Red Army maintained a gross superiority in armor. The best tank the Kwantung Army had in late 1941 was the Type 97 Chi-Ha, holding 33mm armor with a low velocity 57 mm gun. There was also Ha-Go and Te-Ke's with 37 mm guns but they had an effective range less than 1 km. The Soviet T-26, BT-5 and BT-7's had 45 mm guns more than capable of taking out the Japanese armor and the insult to injury was they were crudely made and very expendable. Every Japanese tank knocked out was far greater a loss, as Japan's production simply could not remotely match the USSR. For aircraft the Japanese were a lot better off. The Polikarpov I-16 was the best Soviet fighter in the Far East and performed alright against the Nakajima Ki-27 at Khalkhin Gol. The rest of the Soviet air arsenal were much older and would struggle. The Soviets would have no answer to the IJN's Zero fighter or the IJA's high speed KI-21 bomber that outraced the Soviet SB-2. Japanese pilots were battle hardened by China and vastly experienced. Another thing the Japanese would have going for them was quality of troops. The Soviets drained their best men to fight the Germans, so the combat effectiveness in the far east would be less. Without the Pacific War breaking out, some of Japan's best Generals would be brought into this war, of course the first one that comes to mind for me is General Yamashita, probably the most armor competent Japanese general of ww2. Come August of 1941 those who still sought the invasion of the USSR were facing major crunch time. The IJA planners had assumed the Soviets would transfer 50% or more of their power west to face the Germans, but this was not the case. By August 9th of 1941, facing impossible odds and with the western embargos in full motion, in our timeline the Japanese Hokushin-Ron backers gave up. But for the sake of our story, for some batshit insane reason, the Japanese military leadership and Hirohito give the greenlight for an invasion on August 10th. Part 3 the catastrophe So to reiterate the actual world plan had 10 August: Decide on hostilities 24 August: Complete readiness stance 29 August: Concentrate two divisions from North China in Manchuria, bringing the total to 16 5 September: Concentrate four further divisions from the homeland, bringing the total to 22; complete combat stance 10 September (at latest): Commence combat operations 15 October: Complete first phase of war So what is key to think about here is the events of September. The Battle for Moscow is at the forefront, how does a Japanese invasion in the first week or two of September change things? This is going to probably piss off some of you, but Operation Typhoon would still fail for Germany. In our time line the legendary spy Richard Sorge sent back information on Japan's decision to invade the USSR between August 25th to September 14th. On the 25th he informed Stalin the Japanese high command were still discussing whether to go to war or not with the USSR. On September 6th Stalin was informed the Japanese were beginning preparations for a war against the west. Then on September 14th, the most important message was relayed to Stalin "In the careful judgment of all of us here... the possibility of [Japan] launching an attack, which existed until recently, has disappeared...."[15] With this information on hand from 23 June to 31 December 1941, Stalin transferred a total of 28 divisions west. This included 18 rifle divisions, 1 mountain rifle division, 3 tank divisions, 3 mechanized divisions and 3 mountain cavalry divisions. The transfers occurred mainly in June (11 divisions) and October (9 divisions). Here we come to a crossroads and I am going to have to do some blunt predictions. Let's go from the most optimistic to the most pessimistic. Scenario 1) for some insane reason, Stalin abandons Moscow and moves his industry further east, something the Soviets were actively preparing during Operation Typhoon. This is not a defeat of the USSR, it certainly would prolong the war, but not a defeat. Now that seems rather silly. Scenario 2) Stalin attempts transferring half of what he did in our time line back to Moscow and the Germans fail to take it. The repercussions of course is a limited counteroffensive, it wont be as grand as in our timeline, but Moscow is saved. Scenario 3) and the most likely in my opinion, why would Stalin risk moscow for the Far East? Stalin might not transfer as many troops, but certainly he would have rather placed his chips in Moscow rather than an enemy literally 6000 km's away who have to cross a frozen desert to get to anything he cares about. Even stating these scenarios, the idea the German army would have taken Moscow if some of the very first units from the far east arrived, because remember a lot of these units did not make it in time to defend moscow, rather they contributed to the grand counteroffensive after the Germans stalled. The German armies in front of Moscow were depleted, exhausted, unsupplied and freezing. Yes many of the Soviet armies at Moscow were hastily thrown together, inexperienced, poorly led and still struggling to regain their balance from the German onslaught. Yet from most sources, and by sources I mean armchair historian types argue, the Germans taking Moscow is pretty unlikely. And moscow was not even that important. What a real impact might have been was the loss of the Caucasus oil fields in early 1942, now that could have brought the USSR down, Moscow, not so much, again the Soviets had already pulled their industry further east, they could do it again. So within the context of this Second Russo-Japanese War, figure the German's still grind to a halt, they don't take Moscow, perhaps Soviets dont push them back as hard, but the USSR is not collapsing by any means. Ok now before we talk about Japans invasion we actually need to look at some external players. The UK/US/Netherlands already began massive embargoes against Japan for oil, iron, rubber, tin, everything she needed to continue her war, not just against the USSR, but with over 35 divisions fighting in China. President Roosevelt was looking for any excuse to enter WW2 and was gradually increasing ways to aid Britain and the Soviets. Now American's lend-lease program seriously aided the USSR during WW2, particularly the initial stages of the war. The delivery of lend-lease to the USSR came through three major routes: the Arctic Convoys, the Persian Corridor, and the Pacific Route. The Arctic route was the shortest and most direct route for lend-lease aid to the USSR, though it was also the most dangerous as it involved sailing past German-occupied Norway. Some 3,964,000 tons of goods were shipped by the Arctic route; 7% was lost, while 93% arrived safely. The Persian Corridor was the longest route, and was not fully operational until mid-1942. Thereafter it saw the passage of 4,160,000 tons of goods, 27% of the total. The most important was the Pacific Route which opened up in August of 1941, but became affected when Japan went to war with America. The major port was Vladivostok, where only Soviet ships could transport non-military goods some 8,244,000 tons of goods went by this route, 50% of the total. Vladivostok would almost certainly be captured by the Japanese in our scenario so it won't be viable after its capture. Here is the sticky part, Japan is not at war with the US, so the US is pretty much free to find different Pacific paths to get lend-lease to the Soviets, and to be honest there's always the Arctic or Persian corridors. Hell in this scenario America will be able to get supplies easily into China as there will be no war in Burma, hong kong, Malaya and such. America alone is going to really ruin Japans day by increasing lend-lease to the UK, China and the USSR. America wont be joining the war in 1941, but I would strongly wager by hook or by crook, FDR would pull them into a war against Germany, probably using the same tactic Woodrow Wilson did with WW1. This would only worsen things for Japan. Another player of course is China. Late 1941, China was absolutely battered by Japan. With Japan pulling perhaps even more troops than she did for the Pacific war to fight the USSR, Chiang Kai-Shek would do everything possible to aid his new found close ally Stalin. How this would work out is anyone's guess, but it would be significant as I believe America would be providing a lot more goodies. Ok you've all been patient, what happens with the war? Japan has to deliver a decisive knock out blow in under 4-6 months, anything after this is simply comical as Japan's production has no resources. The oil in siberia is not even remotely on the table. The Japanese can't find it, would not be able to exploit it, let alone quick enough to use it for the war. Hell the Italians were sitting on oil in Libya and they never figured that out during WW2. So Kantokuen is unleashed with an initial blow against the Primorye in the Ussuri Front followed by an assault against Blagoveshchensk and Kiubyshevka. The main soviet lines south of Lake Khanka are attacked by the Japanese 1st area army, 3rd and 20th armies and the 19th Korean division. This inturn threatens Vladivostok who is also being bombarded by IJA/IJN aircraft. The 5th Ija army attacks south of Dalnerechensk in an attempt to sever the trans-siberian railway, to block Soviet reinforcements and supplies. The 4th IJA army fords the Amur river to help with the assault of Blagoveshchensk. Meanwhile Sakhalin is being attacked from land and sea by two IJA divisions. Despite the Soviets being undermanned the western front facing Mongolia and the Trans-Baikal region is wide up to an attack as its only defended by the 23rd IJA division, so a limited counteroffensive begins there. The Japanese quickly win air superiority, however the heavily fortified Tochkas are not being swept aside as the Japanese might have hoped. A major problem the Japanese are facing is Soviet artillery. The Japanese artillery already placed along the borders, initially performed well, crushing Tochkas in range, but when the Japanese begin advancing and deploying their artillery units they are outgunned perhaps 3-1, much of the Soviet artillery outranges them and the Soviets have a much larger stockpile of shells. Airpower is failing to knock out soviet artillery which is placed within Tochkas and other fortified positions with anti-aircraft guns. Without achieving proper neutralization or counter battery fire, the Japanese advance against the fortified Soviet positions. The Soviets respond shockingly with counterattacks. The 15th and 35th Soviet armies with the Amur Red Banner Military Flotilla toss limited counterattacks against both sides of the Sungari River, harassing the Japanese. While much of the soviet armor had been sent west, their light tanks which would be useless against the Germans have been retained in the far east and prove capable of countering the IJA tanks. The Soviets inflict tremendous casualties, however General Yamashita, obsessed with blitzkrieg style warfare he saw first hand in the west, eventually exploits a weak area in the line.Gradually a blitzkrieg punches through and begins to circle around hitting Soviet fortified positions from the rear. The Soviets knew this would be the outcome and had prepared to fight a defense in depth, somewhat managing the onslaught. The trans-siberian railway has been severed in multiple locations close to the border area, however this is not as effective as it could be, the Japanese need to hook deeper to cut the line further away. In the course of weeks the Soviets are gradually dislodged from their fortified positions, fighting a defense in depth over great stretches of land. Vladivostok holds out surprisingly long until the IJN/IJA seize the city. Alongside this Sakhalin is taken with relative ease. The Soviet surface fleet is annihilated, but their large submarine force takes a heavy toll of the IJN who are attempting Pacific landings. Kantokuen phase 1 is meeting its objectives, but far later than expected with much more casualties than expected. The Japanese are shocked by the fuel consumption as they advance further inland. Each truck bearing fuel is using 50% of said fuel to get to the troops, something reminiscent of the north african campaign situation for Rommel. The terrain is terrible for their vehicles full of valleys, hills, forests and mountains. Infrastructure in the region is extremely underdeveloped and the Soviets are burning and destroying everything before the Japanese arrive. All key roads and cities are defended until the Japanese can encircle the Soviets, upon which they depart, similar to situations the Japanese face in China. It is tremendously slow progress. The IJA are finding it difficult to encircle and capture Soviet forces who have prepared a series of rear lines to keep falling back to while performing counterattacks against Japanese columns. As the Japanese advance further into the interior, the IJN are unable to continue supporting them with aircraft and much of the IJA aircraft are limited in operations because of the range. The second phase of Kantokuen calls for the capture of Khabarovsk, Komsomolsk, Skovorodino, Sovetskaya Gavan, and Nikolayevsk. Additionally, amphibious operations against Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky and other parts of the Kamchatka Peninsula are on standby as the IJN fears risking shipping as a result of Soviet submarine operations. The sheer scope of the operation was seeing the tide sides stretching their forces over a front nearly 5000 km in length. At some points the Japanese were attempting to advance more than 1000 km's inland, wasting ungodly amounts of fuel and losing vehicles from wear and tear. So what does Japan gain? Within the span of 4 months, max 6 months Japan could perhaps seized: Sakhalin, the Primorsye krai including Vladivostok, segments of the trans siberian railway, Blagoveshchensk, Kuibyshevka. If they are really lucky Khabarovsk, Komsomolsk, Skovorodino, Sovetskaya Gavan, Nikolayevsk. Additionally, Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky and other parts of the Kamchatka Peninsula. What does this mean? Really nothing. Pull out a map of manchuria during WW2, take a pencil and expand the manchurian border perhaps 1000 km if you really want to be generous, that's the new extent of the empire of the rising sun. The real purpose of attacking the USSR is not to perform some ludicrous dash across 6000 km's of frozen wasteland to whittle down and defeat the Soviets alongside the rest of the Axis. It was only to break them, in late 1941 at Moscow there was perhaps a fools chance, but it was a fool's chance for Japan. Japan has run out of its stockpiles of Kaisenbun, oil, iron, rubber, tin, all types of resources necessary for making war. Unlike in our timeline where Japan began exporting resources from its conquests in southeast asia and the pacific, here Japan spent everything and now is relying on the trickles it has within its empire. The China war will be much more difficult to manage. The lend-lease will increase every day to China. The US/UK/Netherlands will only increase pressure upon Japan to stop being a nuisance, Japan can't do anything about this as the US Pacific Fleet is operating around the Philippines always a looming threat. The Japanese are holding for a lack of better words, useless ground in the far east. They will build a buffer area to defend against what can only be described as a Soviet Invasion of Manchuria x1000. The Allies will be directing all of their effort against Germany and Italy, providing a interesting alternate history concept in its own right. After Germany has been dealt with, Japan would face a existential threat against a very angry Stalin. Cody from Alternate History Hub actually made an episode on this scenario, he believed the Soviets would conquer most of Japan occupied Asia and even invade the home islands. It would certainly be something on the table, taking many years, but the US/UK would most likely interfere in some way. The outcome would be so much worse for Japan. Perhaps she is occupied and a communist government is installed. Perhaps like in our timeline the Americans come in to bolster Japan up for the looming coldwar. But the question I sought to answer here was, Japan invading the USSR was a dumb idea. The few Japanese commanders who pushed it all the way until August 9th of 1941 simply had to give up because of how illogical it was. I honestly should not have even talked about military matters, this all came down to logistics and resources. You want to know how Japan could have secured itself a better deal in WW2? 1941, the China War is the number one problem Japan can't solve so they look north or south to acquire the means to solve the China problem? Negotiate a peace with China. That is the lackluster best deal right there. Sorry if this episode did not match your wildest dreams. But if you want me to do some batshit crazy alternate history stuff, I am more than happy to jump into it and have fun. Again thank all of you guys who joined the patreon, you guys are awesome. Until next time this is the Pacific War channel over and out.
10/7/2025 PODCAST Episode #3050 GUESTS: Eddie Yeranian, Todd Sheets, Sen. Marsha Blackburn+ YOUR CALLS! at 1-888-480-JOHN (5646) and GETTR Live! @jfradioshow #GodzillaOfTruth #TruckingTheTruth
This is a fan fav episode. What up homie! I've got a powerful two-part episode that's going to expose everything you need to know before you negotiate your time, your affection, or your peace of mind with a narcissist. Today we have the top globally recognized attorney who specializes in narcissistic negotiations joining us to spill the tea. It's not enough to just spot red flags in your personal and professional lives, I want you to understand the danger of missing them and Rebecca Zung is delivering what you need to beat the narcissist at home and in the office. Spot the narcissists hiding among us and get what you need out of them on your terms in the first part of today's episode: *Turn the tables and learn how to ETHICALLY manipulate the manipulator *Discover the narcissist's scam that's leaving high-value women like yourself feeling undervalued and worthless. *Genius phrases that'll disarm your narcissist, protect you, and give you the leverage you need to beat them at their own game. After this power packed episode you'll know the secret to beating narcissists and getting them to shrink in any situation. All of this is unfolding now! This is for my homies aiming for success and balance in life. Learn how to navigate a toxic partner at home and in the corporate world, because when you know the game, you can actually win! Check out Rebecca's book, Slay the Bully, How to Negotiate with a Narcissist & Win: https://www.amazon.com/SLAY-Bully-How-Negotiate-Narcissist/dp/1637586868 Original air date: 1-4-2023 REBECCA ZUNG QUOTES: “You have to be really clear about what you want in a negotiation or you're not going to be able to get there.” “All narcissists are driven by one thing and one thing only. That is narcissistic supply.” “Not only is the narcissist not rational and reasonable when you're dealing with them in negotiation, also the target person has been traumatized too…” Follow Rebecca Zung: Website: https://www.rebeccazung.com/ YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@RebeccaZungEsq Twitter: https://twitter.com/rebeccazung Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/rebeccazung/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rebeccazung/ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
We all carry wounds—some visible, others tucked away deep inside. But what if those very wounds could become the source of your greatest strength? What if the challenges you've encountered could be used as springboards to help you regain your voice, your purpose, and your power? Today's conversation is about that transformation—about rising from the ashes, embracing your inner warrior, and discovering how feminine negotiation can become a tool for healing and empowerment. In today's episode, Cindy Watson sits down with Tiffany Owen for a powerful and inspiring conversation on From Wounded to Warrior: Reclaiming Power Through Feminine Negotiation. Tiffany is a transformational health and mindset coach, a sought-after keynote speaker, and a published author whose mission is to help people rise from the ashes of their past and step fully into the lives they were meant to live. Together, Cindy and Tiffany will explore how embracing feminine negotiation principles can help you shift from a place of pain to one of strength, reclaiming your power and rewriting your story. Key takeaways: How to negotiate yourself and turn pain into purpose. What are some of the biggest mindset blocks? How to identify limiting beliefs and the things that you're saying to yourself that are holding you back. How to reclaim your power. The role forgiveness plays. How does the physical fitness piece intersect with that emotional or psychological empowerment? And many more! Learn more about Tiffany. Website: https://coachtiffanyowen.com/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/tiffany.owen.991325/ LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/tiffany-owen-texas/ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/coachtiffanyowen/ FREE GIFT!!! Send a DM to Tiffany to any of her platform to claim your free gift, the keyword is “Power”. If you're looking to up-level your negotiation skills, I have everything from online to group to my signature one-on-one mastermind & VIP experiences available to help you better leverage your innate power to get more of what you want and deserve in life. Check out our website at www.artofFeminineNegotiation.com if that sounds interesting to you. Get Cindy's book here: Amazon https://www.amazon.com/Art-Feminine-Negotiation-Boardroom-Bedroom-ebook/dp/B0B8KPCYZP?inf_contact_key=94d07c699eea186d2adfbddfef6fb9e2&inf_contact_key=013613337189d4d12be8d2bca3c26821680f8914173f9191b1c0223e68310bb1 EBook https://www.amazon.com/Art-Feminine-Negotiation-Boardroom-Bedroom-ebook/dp/B0B8KPCYZP?inf_contact_key=94d07c699eea186d2adfbddfef6fb9e2&inf_contact_key=013613337189d4d12be8d2bca3c26821680f8914173f9191b1c0223e68310bb1 Barnes and Noble https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/the-art-of-feminine-negotiation-cindy-watson/1141499614?ean=9781631959776 CONNECT WITH CINDY: Website: www.womenonpurpose.ca Website: www.practicingwithpurpose.org Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/womenonpurposecommunity/ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/womenonpurposecoaching/ LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/thecindywatson Show: https://www.womenonpurpose.ca/media/podcast-2/ X(Twitter): https://twitter.com/womenonpurpose1 YouTube:https://www.youtube.com/@hersuasion Email: cindy@womenonpurpose.ca
What's a Government Shutdown and Why Are We In One?A government shutdown happens when Congress fails to pass annual spending bills or a stopgap continuing resolution (CR) to keep agencies funded. No funding = no authority to operate = federal workers furloughed, services paused, and chaos for agencies and contractors.The House has passed a CR that would fund the government through November 21, but the Senate has rejected it three times. That CR keeps spending at current levels and buys Congress more time to negotiate a full budget. Think of it as saying, “We'll work out the details later, but in the meantime, keep the lights on.”So why the rejection? The sticking points are:* Democrats want the bill to include an extension of Affordable Care Act (ACA) subsidies, which are about to expire.* They also want to block the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) from continuing to cut previously appropriated funds—something they see as a power grab.* Senator Rand Paul is the only Republican joining Democrats in opposing the House CR, but most Senate Democrats have voted it down.What Has to Happen to End the Shutdown?There are four main steps to reopening the government:* Negotiate a compromise CR. Either Republicans agree to ACA and OMB language, or Democrats back off.* Secure bicameral agreement. If the Senate changes the bill, it has to go back to the House.* Presidential approval. Trump has hinted he won't sign anything that includes ACA subsidies or limits on the OMB.* Implementation. Once signed, agencies resume normal operations and furloughed workers return.Two likely paths out of the shutdown:* Republicans stand firm → Democrats allow a CR vote without ACA or OMB demands, hoping to negotiate later.* A compromise CR is passed → includes ACA subsidies and OMB limits → enough Senate Democrats back it → risk of Trump veto remains.Why Is This So Complicated?The shutdown highlights a procedural gap between the House and Senate:* In the House, Republicans have a majority and can pass CRs with zero Democratic votes.* In the Senate, most bills need 60 votes to end debate (invoke cloture) and move to a final vote. Republicans don't have the numbers.Republicans could try to change Senate rules—eliminate the filibuster for budget bills and go with a simple majority—but that would be a massive institutional shift with long-term consequences.Until a resolution is reached, the government remains partially closed and the policy fight over ACA funding and executive power continues.What Happens If Republicans Do Make the Change?If Senate Republicans decide to invoke the so-called “nuclear option”—changing the chamber's rules to eliminate the 60-vote threshold for spending bills—the legislative and political landscape could shift immediately and dramatically.Immediate consequences:Republicans could pass the House-approved continuing resolution with no Democratic support, reopening the government on their terms. That means no extension of ACA subsidies, no restrictions on the Office of Management and Budget, and no need to negotiate across the aisle.Medium-term effects:The rule change would permanently alter how Congress handles appropriations. Any party with a Senate majority and House control could pass funding bills unilaterally, sidestepping the need for bipartisan coalitions. This could speed up the process—but also deepen partisan divides in budget negotiations.Long-term implications:Effectively, it would mean the end of the filibuster for all spending legislation. Shutdowns might become less frequent, since fewer votes are needed to keep the government open—but funding priorities could swing wildly every time control of Congress changes hands. One Congress could expand programs and hike spending; the next could cut deeply, all with a simple majority.In short, while the nuclear option would solve the immediate standoff, it would reshape the Senate's role in fiscal policymaking—and shift power further toward the majority party.Why Can't Republicans Just Pass a Budget Bill?If you've been hearing people say, “Just pass it as a budget bill—no filibuster needed,” here's why that's not happening.The Senate does have a special process called budget reconciliation, which allows certain bills to pass with just 51 votes—no filibuster, no 60-vote threshold. But there are some important catches:* It can only be used once per fiscal year.Technically, reconciliation instructions can cover three areas—spending, revenue, and the debt limit—but Congress usually combines them into a single package. That bill has already been used this year (for the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act”), so the reconciliation tool is off the table until the next fiscal year.* The content of the bill is strictly limited.Under the Byrd Rule, reconciliation bills must directly relate to taxing or spending. Any provision that doesn't have a direct budgetary effect, or that increases the deficit beyond a 10-year window, gets stripped out—or the whole bill risks being disqualified.That's why the current CR probably couldn't go through reconciliation even if that option remained available this fiscal year. It likely includes provisions that violate the Byrd Rule—and certainly would if the OMB limitation Democrats want was included. Those elements either aren't strictly budgetary or would impact the long-term deficit.So even though Republicans hold a Senate majority, they can't simply slap a “budget” label on this bill and pass it with 51 votes. That procedural door is closed for now.If they want to bypass the filibuster, their only real option would be to change Senate rules—a dramatic move that would eliminate the 60-vote requirement for spending bills altogether. Otherwise, they'll need to cut a deal that clears the 60-vote threshold—or accept a prolonged shutdown.That is the current state of the shutdown – we'll see you back here on Monday for our usual daily news shows. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe
Trump and Netanyahu unveil a 20-point peace plan aimed at ending the Israel-Hamas war and rebuilding Gaza under a new transitional governance system. The proposal includes hostage exchanges, Gaza redevelopment, Hamas disarmament, and international oversight led by Trump and Tony Blair. The panel debates whether Hamas will comply, the risks of releasing prisoners, and if this sets the stage for future conflict with Iran.
President Trump says he is pledging to cut Democratic agencies. His energy secretary joins as we are now several hours away from day three of the partial federal government shutdown. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Congress did not meet on Thursday in part due to the Jewish holiday of Yom Kippur. But when the Senate returns Friday, the question is, what is the way out of this shutdown? There are some in the Senate trying to talk across the aisle and find a way forward. One of those is Republican Sen. Mike Rounds of South Dakota. He joined Lisa Desjardins to discuss those efforts. PBS News is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/funders. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy
As a teenager, Sir Richard Branson had already mastered the art of taking bold leaps to pursue opportunities. Dyslexic and struggling in school, he quit at age 15 to launch a youth magazine, a move that eventually led to Virgin Records, Virgin Atlantic, and the Virgin Group empire. In this LEAP Replay, Richard joins Ilana to share how he turned obstacles into opportunities, embraced fearless risk-taking, and uses his influence for international peace initiatives, all while showing that dyslexia can be a superpower. Sir Richard Branson is the founder of Virgin Group, spanning airlines, cruises, hotels, health, entertainment, and space travel. Known for his adventurous spirit and bold pursuits, he has not only transformed industries but also used his influence to champion global humanitarian causes. In this episode, Ilana and Richard will discuss: (00:00) Introduction (02:10) Quitting School at 15 to Run a Magazine (05:26) Launching Virgin Records with a Bold Move (09:20) The Funny Moment That Birthed Virgin Atlantic (11:37) Using His Influence to Negotiate with Saddam Hussein (15:54) The “Reserve Tank” Mindset for Mental Toughness (18:17) Why Dyslexic Thinking Is a Superpower in Business Sir Richard Branson is a serial entrepreneur and founder of the Virgin Group, a global conglomerate of more than 40 companies spanning industries from entertainment to aviation and space travel. Known for his adventurous spirit and bold approach to business, Richard built Virgin into one of the world's most recognized brands. Beyond entrepreneurship, he is a philanthropist, author of multiple bestsellers, and a passionate advocate for social and environmental causes. Connect with Richard: Richard's Website: https://www.virgin.com/branson-family/richard-branson Richard's LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/rbranson Resources Mentioned: Richard's Audiobook: Losing and Finding My Virginity: The Full Story: https://www.amazon.com/Losing-Finding-My-Virginity-Story/dp/B0CW8BS7W7 Leap Academy: Ready to make the LEAP in your career? There is a NEW WAY for professionals to fast-track their careers and leap to bigger opportunities. Check out our free training today at https://bit.ly/leap--free-training
In Episode 12 of Negotiate X in Rewind, organizational leader and stand-up comedian Courtney Bickert joins hosts Nolan Martin and Aram Donigian to reveal how humor eases negotiations. She explains the science behind laughter, showing how it reduces stress, sparks creativity, and strengthens bonds that foster collaboration. Courtney also shares practical tips on setting a positive tone, using humor authentically, and finding the right moments to lighten the mood. Through stories from corporate retreats to tense international encounters, she demonstrates that humor is more than entertainment—it is a powerful tool for trust, connection, and successful outcomes.
Congress did not meet on Thursday in part due to the Jewish holiday of Yom Kippur. But when the Senate returns Friday, the question is, what is the way out of this shutdown? There are some in the Senate trying to talk across the aisle and find a way forward. One of those is Republican Sen. Mike Rounds of South Dakota. He joined Lisa Desjardins to discuss those efforts. PBS News is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/funders. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy
Think company research has to take hours? Think again. Most job seekers either fall down endless rabbit holes or show up unprepared and it's costing them interviews, offers, and even salary.That's why in this episode, I bring in Olivia, our Director of Customer Success, to reveal the game-changing strategy for researching any company in just 15 minutes. We'll show you exactly what to look for (and what to skip), how to use resources like G2 reviews and SEC filings to your advantage, and the way smart research can even boost your compensation—all with real client stories and tangible takeaways you can implement today.You'll walk away with a research checklist that slices your prep time in half, surfaces the insights that matter, and most importantly, positions you as a standout candidate who's never caught off-guard. Want to know the research secrets that transform offers? Hit play and let's dive in.02:37 – How Spending Too Much (or Too Little) Time on Company Research Can Cost You the Job Offer 5:02 – Why Demonstrating Customer Success Skills in Your Research Sets You Apart from Other Candidates 8:20 – The Secret to Doing Effective 15-Minute Company Research Without Panic or Overwhelm 10:06 – Why Knowing a Company's Value Proposition Matters More Than Memorizing Their Mission Statement11:40 – The Fastest Way to Find a Company's Value Prop (Hint: Case Studies and AI Can Do the Work for You)14:05 – How to Quickly Analyze Financial Data Like SEC Filings Even if You're Not a Numbers Person17:20 – A Real-Life Example of How a Job Seeker Used G2 Reviews to Negotiate a Higher Base Salary18:54 – Why “Uncomfortable” Research Topics (Like Negative Reviews or WARN Notices) Can Help You Make Smart Career Choices22:53 – The Checklist and AI Playbook: How to Make Scalable Research a Repeatable Habit (Without the Rabbit Holes)24:46 – Why It's Crucial to Time Your Research (You Don't Need to Know Everything Before You Apply)
Hey Doc,Are you the problem? Not you alone, but us. Women physicians.Without realizing it, we uphold the very systems — patriarchy, sexism, racism — that keep us playing small. It shows up in the way we react when another woman asks for more, when we hesitate to negotiate, or when we discourage salary transparency, and when we are passing down outdated advice to younger women physicians.The truth is: the system of medicine was built in a different era, for a different demographic — and those old rules still shape how we show up today.This isn't about blame. It's about accountability. It's about unlearning what we were taught, and replacing them with a culture that actually serves us.In this episode you'll hear:Why asking for more should be celebrated, not criticizedThe danger of believing negotiation is “unprofessional”Why pay transparency matters (and who really benefits when we stay silent)How to hold yourself and other women physicians accountable in a way that opens conversation instead of shutting it downDoc, it's time to stop shrinking yourself to fit outdated expectations. Take back your power. Ask. Negotiate. Advocate. And support other women when they do the same.What did you think of the episode, doc? Let me know! Subscribe to ✨Stethoscopes and Strollers✨ on your favorite podcast platform so you never miss an episode. Apple Podcast | Spotify | YouTube Connect with me: Website | Instagram | Facebook Join my Email list to get tips on navigating motherhood in the medical field. If you are going through a transition -- becoming a parent, leaving a job, figuring out how manage it all, schedule a free coaching session. Free Coaching Session with Dr. Toya
Tonight on The Last Word: Donald Trump posts a racist fake video after a White House meeting with Democrats. Also, Senate Democrats press the Justice Department to release files on the border czar Tom Homan bribery investigation. Plus, The Wall Street Journal reports on new details about the Ghislaine Maxwell prison transfer after her Justice Department interview. And Oversight Democrats release a third batch of Epstein documents. Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, and Rep. Ro Khanna join Lawrence O'Donnell. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
Need help with a negotiation? Text us and we'll feature your question on the show.In this episode, we sit down with Mark Anthony McCray—one of the top sales leaders in global logistics—to unpack what really drives sales negotiations. Mark's core philosophy: remove friction. When you make it easy to do business with you—and help your buyer look good to their stakeholders—deals move. They discuss practical prep using a negotiation checklist, aligning cross-functional teams (pricing, legal, CS), and the underrated habit of simply asking for more. You'll hear daily tactics (Google Alerts, clear call purposes) and mindset shifts (everyone can win; ego and reputation drive decisions) you can apply today—even if you don't carry a sales title. If you want sharper conversations, faster cycles, and bigger outcomes, this one's for you. Get My Book: Negotiation Made SimpleSchedule a Live WorkshopSchedule a Private WorkshopGet Private Coaching from MeGain Access to My Online CourseFollow Me on LinkedIn
When rejection strikes, smart bets win. Mark Cuban knows that the biggest opportunities don't come from luck, they come from bold, calculated moves. In this episode of Hello Monday, Jessi Hempel sits down with Mark, the entrepreneur, investor, and Shark Tank star, to uncover how he turns setbacks into wins and spots opportunities before anyone else does. From negotiating high-stakes deals to pivoting careers in uncertain times, he shares the mindset and strategies that help him thrive when the future feels unpredictable. This conversation will leave you with tools to: Identify opportunities others overlook Make smarter bets that pay off Turn rejection and failure into momentum Negotiate with confidence and get what you're worth Stay resilient in a world that never stops changing Navigate career pivots, ageism, and salary conversations at any stage Don't just survive the changing world of work; learn how to turn uncertainty into your greatest advantage. Continue the conversation at Hello Monday Office Hours, Wednesdays at 3 PM ET on the LinkedIn News page. Watch the extended conversation with LinkedIn Premium.
Tonight on The Last Word: House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries says the GOP needs to cancel healthcare cuts. Also, prosecutors reportedly opposed charging James Comey in a memo to a Trump U.S. attorney, citing no probable cause. Plus, MSNBC reports the FBI recorded Trump border czar Tom Homan taking $50,000 from undercover agents last year. And an ad slams GOP Senate candidate Michael Whatley over FEMA's Hurricane Helene recovery in North Carolina. Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, Ken Dilanian, and fmr. Gov. Roy Cooper join Lawrence O'Donnell. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
President Donald Trump wants Harvard to cough up at least $500 million. Longtime Harvard professor Steven Pinker says it's extortion. And Harvard should do it anyway. Globe columnist Carine Hajjar, filling in for host Shirley Leung, talks to Steven Pinker about caving to the Trump administration and where to draw the line. Email us at saymore@globe.com.
Episode 11 of the Negotiate X in Rewind series brings Robert Wilkinson and Naseem Khuri into conversation with Aram Donigian and Nolan Martin to unpack the art of mastering constructive disagreement in negotiation. The guests explain why conflict is inevitable but not inherently destructive, emphasizing that leaders must learn to distinguish between harmful struggles and productive tensions. Additionally, they highlight the importance of slowing down before reacting, knowing when to provoke debate versus building unity, and modeling conflict skills at home and in professional life. This episode demonstrates how constructive disagreement fuels growth, innovation, and stronger connections.
High-performing teams don't happen by accident. In this episode of Millions Were Made, Jessica Marx breaks down how to architect incentive compensation that drives profitable growth quarter after quarter—without bloating base salaries or rewarding the wrong behavior.You'll learn exactly how to:Define “incentive comp” for W-2 roles (and when it can apply to select 1099s).Replace vague annual bonuses with 90-day, KPI-tied payouts that create focus and speed.Negotiate top talent you “can't afford” by holding base flat and layering an upside they can actually earn.Weight goals across 3–5 initiative buckets (e.g., margin protection, volume, cost control, culture/retention) so you're not bribing for unhealthy revenue.Set targets that are achievable but ambitious, and what it means if someone only hits 20% of the plan.Roll out a plan mid-year the right way (what to communicate and when).Use AI (yes, ChatGPT) the right way to draft plans you'll still refine to your business.Key TakeawaysQuarterly > annual. 90-day sprints increase focus, frequency of reward, and recall of what earned the bonus.Not just revenue. Tie upside to profitable growth and cost/quality leading indicators (retention, budget adherence, pipeline volume, deliverable quality).Pay mix is a lever. Use incentive comp to bridge a salary gap in hiring—only paying extra when the business wins.Clarity wins. Show the scorecard, weights (e.g., 30/25/20/15/10), how it's measured, and pay timing (mid-month following quarter close).Reality check. If targets are routinely missed, either the plan is unrealistic—or the person isn't the fit.Mini-Timeline00:02:29–04:33 What incentive comp is (beyond sales) & why quarterly works05:53–08:10 Hiring example: hold base steady, add $24k annual upside tied to ROI10:53–12:56 Why you must avoid “unhealthy revenue” targets16:49–19:05 When and how to roll out the plan (and what not to do)20:45–21:56 Calibrate difficulty; what persistent 20% attainment really signalsResourcesConnect with us on IG @MillionsWereMadeListen to episode #44 - How to Motivate How to Motivate Your Team and Build a Scalable Company Culture
HEADLINE: Mikoyan Negotiates the "Crisis of November" with Fidel Castro GUEST NAME: Professor Serhii Plokhy BOOK TITLE: Nuclear Folly TOPIC: Accidental War Warning SUMMARY: After the crisis resolution, Nikita Khrushchev rationalized his actions but faced internal criticism. Fidel Castro, who had advocated nuclear attack, felt insulted by the lack of consultation. Khrushchev sent Mikoyan to negotiate with Castro, who refused to allow inspections and sought to retain tactical nuclear weapons, leading to the "crisis of November." The eventual, humiliating Soviet withdrawal verified by US ships was cited in Khrushchev's later removal. 1899 HAVANA
Navigating relationships with narcissists can feel like stepping into a battlefield where the rules keep shifting. The constant push and pull, the gaslighting, and the emotional manipulation leave many feeling powerless, silenced, and unsure of how to move forward. Yet even in the most difficult dynamics, there is a way to reclaim your voice, protect your boundaries, and negotiate from a place of strength. In today's conversation, join your host, Cindy Watson, together we'll explore these challenges with someone who knows the terrain all too well. Dana S. Diaz has not only lived through the cycle of abuse and narcissistic control, but she has also turned her healing into a mission—empowering others to break free and rise stronger than ever. Through her bestselling memoirs and her work as a coach and speaker, Dana offers hope, strategies, and a roadmap for anyone facing the exhausting reality of negotiating with a narcissist. In this episode, we will uncover: The red flags of a narcissistic person. How to negotiate with a narcissist. How and what negotiation look like when there is no empathy and respect. What specific red flags people should watch for when it comes to gaslighting tactics? How to see those patterns showing up when people are negotiating, and what's one clear sign someone should be on the lookout for if gaslighting is at play? How to negotiate for your boundaries? And many more! Learn more about Dana: Website: https://danasdiaz.com/ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/danas.diaz/ LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/dana-s-diaz-208927298/ If you're looking to up-level your negotiation skills, I have everything from online to group to my signature one-on-one mastermind & VIP experiences available to help you better leverage your innate power to get more of what you want and deserve in life. Check out our website at www.artofFeminineNegotiation.com if that sounds interesting to you. Get Cindy's book here: Amazon https://www.amazon.com/Art-Feminine-Negotiation-Boardroom-Bedroom-ebook/dp/B0B8KPCYZP?inf_contact_key=94d07c699eea186d2adfbddfef6fb9e2&inf_contact_key=013613337189d4d12be8d2bca3c26821680f8914173f9191b1c0223e68310bb1 EBook https://www.amazon.com/Art-Feminine-Negotiation-Boardroom-Bedroom-ebook/dp/B0B8KPCYZP?inf_contact_key=94d07c699eea186d2adfbddfef6fb9e2&inf_contact_key=013613337189d4d12be8d2bca3c26821680f8914173f9191b1c0223e68310bb1 Barnes and Noble https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/the-art-of-feminine-negotiation-cindy-watson/1141499614?ean=9781631959776 CONNECT WITH CINDY: Website: www.womenonpurpose.ca Website: www.practicingwithpurpose.org Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/womenonpurposecommunity/ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/womenonpurposecoaching/ LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/thecindywatson Show: https://www.womenonpurpose.ca/media/podcast-2/ X(Twitter): https://twitter.com/womenonpurpose1 YouTube:https://www.youtube.com/@hersuasion Email: cindy@womenonpurpose.ca
You Cannot Negotiate Desire
Let's set the scene. You just toured four apartments with a broker. It's the end of the day and you're tired. You liked all of the apartments, but weren't crazy about any of them. Then, your broker says: “Actually, there's just one last apartment I want to show you.” And then, all of a sudden, you're there. In your dream apartment. There's just one tiny detail: it's out of your budget. Sound familiar? That's what one of our producers Mike is going through now. Today, Nicole helps him make his next move (literally). Originally aired 3/3/22
Do you ever wonder what really defines narcissism and high-conflict behavior — and how you can protect yourself when faced with it? In this episode, I sit down with Rebecca Zung to break it down in a way that's clear, empowering, and practical. Rebecca's journey is remarkable: once a college dropout and single mom, she went on to become one of the nation's most powerful attorneys and a bestselling author. She's now dedicated to helping people recognize toxic dynamics and learn how to negotiate with confidence. Her latest book, SLAY the Bully: How to Negotiate with a Narcissist and Win, offers proven strategies that have reached millions through her podcast, YouTube channel, and writing. Together, we explore the key traits of narcissism, what makes someone high-conflict, and most importantly, what you can do to reclaim your power in the face of manipulation. Whether you're navigating a difficult relationship, workplace conflict, or just want to better understand human behavior, this conversation will give you tools to feel stronger, clearer, and more free
In this episode of The President's Daily Brief: Despite opposition from local leaders, the Department of Homeland Security has launched a major offensive against criminal aliens in the city of Chicago. We'll have the latest details on Operation Midway Blitz. A deal brokered by the U.S. sees the release of dozens of political prisoners in Belarus. To listen to the show ad-free, become a premium member of The President's Daily Brief by visiting PDBPremium.com. Please remember to subscribe if you enjoyed this episode of The President's Daily Brief. YouTube: youtube.com/@presidentsdailybrief CBDistillery: Visit https://CBDistillery.com and use promo code PDB for 25% off your entire order!BRUNT Workwear: Get $10 Off at BRUNT with code PDB at https://www.bruntworkwear.com/PDB #BruntpodLean: Visit https://TakeLean.com & use code PDB for 20% off Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Charlie Kirk was assassinated yesterday (2:30). Nicky Smokes tried to expense cigarettes on the Beach House (17:30). Dave gives a Fox update and how he feels Wake Up Barstool is doing (18:30). T-Bob and Kayce got hammered in front of Dave during a live stream (21:45). Dave wants to be the spokesman for Imodium (24:00) Mut joins the show to pitch a job at Barstool (27:30). Mut brings up the negatives (36:00). Chris Klemmer's reaction to Mut's pitch (41:00).You can find every episode of this show on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or YouTube. Prime Members can listen ad-free on Amazon Music. For more, visit barstool.link/unnamedshow
CONTINUED John HardIe. Bill Roggio. Russia Intensifies Ukraine Barrage; Trump Faces Pressure for Stronger Sanctions. Russia launched a massive drone and missile attack on Ukraine, signaling Putin's refusal to negotiate. President Trumpfaces pressure to implement tougher sanctions on Russian oil revenue. Ukraine faces infantry shortages and porous lines but is improving air defenses. Russian advances are slow, struggling to exploit Ukrainian vulnerabilities on the battlefield. 1855 BRITISH CRIMEA