Podcasts about Ressentiment

What can JD Vance's arguments with Pope Francis teach us about selfishness, altruism, and the morality of the modern world?Join the team at the IAI for four articles about egoism, self-sacrifice, and everything in between, analysing a range of subjects, including: Friedrich Nietzsche and his rivalry with former maestro Arthur Schopenhauer; the 10 Commandments and their relationship to jealousy; why God might be "stupid, indifferent, and evil"; and of course the aforementioned showdown between JD and the Pope.These articles were written by Slavoj Žižek, Steven D. Hales, Kristján Kristjánsson, and Guy Elgat.Slavoj Žižek is a Hegelian philosopher, a Lacanian psychoanalyst, and a Communist. He is the author of 'Christian Atheism: How to Be a Real Materialist'. Steven D. Hales is Professor of Philosophy at Bloomsburg University of Pennsylvania, and author of 'The Myth of Luck: Philosophy, Fate and Fortune'. Kristján Kristjánsson is Professor of Character Education and Virtue Ethics at the University of Birmingham. His work spans topics in moral philosophy, moral psychology, and moral education. He is also the editor of the Journal of Moral Education. Guy Elgat is a lecturer at the School of the Art Institute of Chicago. He is the author of 'Nietzsche's Psychology of Ressentiment' and 'Being Guilty: Freedom, Responsibility, and Conscience in German Philosophy from Kant to Heidegger'.And don't hesitate to email us at podcast@iai.tv with your thoughts or questions on the episode!To witness such debates live buy tickets for our upcoming festival: https://howthelightgetsin.org/festivals/And visit our website for many more articles, videos, and podcasts like this one: https://iai.tv/You can find everything we referenced here: https://linktr.ee/philosophyforourtimesSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Vanaf 2006 was Patty Pontier achttien jaar lang docent Filosofie bij de ArtEZ Academie voor Art & Design in Zwolle. Bij haar pensionering laat zij de studenten van ArtEZ een wel heel bijzonder cadeau na: de tweedelige podcastreeks Kunst als wapen tegen ongelijkheid. Pontier vroeg zich af hoe het mogelijk is dat er in de decennia dat zij professioneel actief is geweest zo weinig veranderd is. Hoe kan het dat er nog steeds zoveel verborgen ongelijkheid is?   “Het blijft schokkend hoe vaak je als vrouw nog moet vechten om serieus genomen te worden. Daarom wil ik met deze podcast studenten bemoedigen en laten zien hoe krachtig kunst kan zijn als vorm van verzet.” Patty Pontier   In de podcastreeks gaat Patty onder meer te rade bij Simone de Beauvoir, de iconische filosoof die al in de jaren vijftig vrouwenongelijkheid op briljante wijze aan de orde stelde in De tweede sekse. Ook spreekt ze met de bevriende actrice Jacqueline Blom. Naast haar werk als acteur, onder meer in de tv-serie Oogappels, is zij mede-oprichter van het platform Point of VieW, dat kennis verzamelt over machtsstructuren en stereotypen in de kunsten en deze vanuit een vrouwelijk perspectief belicht.   Patty haalt bijzondere verhalen aan waarin kunst functioneert als wapen tegen ongelijkheid. Daarbij gaat zij in gesprek met oud-studenten van ArtEZ Rachelle Jeuring, Nicky Kuis en Nova de Hoo: jonge kunstenaars die zich uitspreken, die belangrijke verhalen brengen, die de kwetsbaarheid van vrouwen agenderen.   Patty Pontier steekt de luisteraars een hart onder de riem: ‘Deze voorbeelden laten zien: kunst kan echt iets veranderen. Verzet is nodig juist nu de wereld steeds onverdraagzamer lijkt te worden.'   Deze serie werd samengesteld door Patty Pontier en Dennis Gaens in opdracht van Mirjam Zegers, ArtEZ Studium Generale. Met dank aan Jacqueline Blom, Rachelle Jeuring, Nova de Hoo en Nikki Kuis. Bekijk ook het filminterview door Irene Constandse en lees Patty Pontiers tekst over Spinoza als inspiratiebron voor de kunst. Tune door Daan van Haren.  Aamvullende muziek van HARBRS. Referenties   Brinkgreve, C. Beladen huis, Atlas Contact, 2025   De Beauvoir, S. De tweede sekse, Bijleveld, 2023, Nawoord. Simone de Beauvoir - Existentialist en feminist - Filosofie Magazine Denker der Nederlanden David van Reybrouck   Reybrouck, D. Fascisme, veel mensen hebben er gewoon zin in. Trouw, 14 maart 2025. ‘Het fenomeen Trump komt niet uit de lucht vallen: het past in een trend die we de laatste jaren overal zien, de terugkeer van een rancuneuze, masculiene, autocratische, populistische en in simplismen grossierende politieke cultuur. De narcistische bullebak als leidersfiguur. Ressentiment als motor van persoonlijke ambitie en maatschappelijk project. Woede als waarde. Onbeschaamdheid als deugd. Stompzinnigheid als trots.'   https://www.nationalgeographic.nl/geschiedenis-archeologie/a62730160/wet-handelingsonbekwaamheid-1956   Wijziging abortuswet | Tweede Kamer stemt voor afschaffen bedenktermijn abortus | Corinne Ellemeet. Fragment Dolle Mina actievoerder   Podcast Reformatorisch Dagblad ‘Debat bedenktermijn abortus roept emotionele reacties op' | RDactueel #29. Fragmenten Chris Stoffer (SGP) en Caroline van der Plas (BBB)   Paula Rego, Abortion as a subject matter in my pictures, Web of Stories – Life Stories of Remarkable People                               Podcast De Bitch en de Hoer, Jacqueline Blom en Corien van der Zwaag   Jacqueline Blom           Point of View | Team Point of VieW                   Point of View | Home https://www.instagram.com/pointofview.nu/   Alice Guy-Blaché         Alice Guy-Blaché - Wikipedia Be Natural: The Untold Story of Alice Guy-Blaché (2018) Lucretia van Merken https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucretia_Wilhelmina_van_Merken Wijziging abortuswet | Tweede Kamer stemt voor afschaffen bedenktermijn abortus | Corinne Ellemeet   Mary Ann Sieghart – Official website of English journalist​, radio presenter and former assistant editor of The Times Mary Ann Sieghart. Sieghart, M., The Authority Gap, Black Swan, 2022   Mary Ann Sieghart: Why are women still taken less seriously than men? TED Women October 2023   Rachelle Jeuring, Femicide, de meest voorspelbare moord, 2024   Rachelle Jeuring   Opleiding Graphic Design     

durée : 00:39:02 - France Culture va plus loin (l'Invité(e) des Matins) - par : Guillaume Erner, Isabelle de Gaulmyn - Le quotidien Ouest-France publie une enquête sociologique intitulée "Paroles de campagne. Imaginaires et réalités de la ruralité française" qui révèle les revendications des populations en milieu rural. Décryptage. - réalisation : Félicie Faugère - invités : Salomé Berlioux Entrepreneure social et essayiste, fondatrice et Directrice générale de l'association Rura (ex "Chemins d'avenirs"); Eric Charmes Sociologue, directeur de recherches à l'Ecole nationale des travaux publics de l'Etat.

This lecture discusses key ideas from the 20th century German philosopher, sociologist of knowledge, and phenomenologist, Max Scheler's work Ressentiment, which provides an interpretation of Friedrich Nietzsche's concept of that same name. It focuses on his discussion near the end of the third part of the work "Christian Morality and Ressentment", about whether Christian morality, based upon love, can be adequately brought within the scope of secular moralities focused upon justice, fairness, and welfare To support my ongoing work, go to my Patreon site - www.patreon.com/sadler If you'd like to make a direct contribution, you can do so here - www.paypal.me/ReasonIO - or at BuyMeACoffee - www.buymeacoffee.com/A4quYdWoM You can find over 3000 philosophy videos in my main YouTube channel - www.youtube.com/user/gbisadler Purchase Max Scheler's Ressentiment - amzn.to/4f3mv18

This lecture discusses key ideas from the 20th century German philosopher, sociologist of knowledge, and phenomenologist, Max Scheler's work Ressentiment, which provides an interpretation of Friedrich Nietzsche's concept of that same name. It focuses on his discussion in the third part of the work "Christian Morality and Ressentment" providing an assessment of Nietzsche's criticisms of and charges against Christianity, understood primarily as a system of morality. To support my ongoing work, go to my Patreon site - www.patreon.com/sadler If you'd like to make a direct contribution, you can do so here - www.paypal.me/ReasonIO - or at BuyMeACoffee - www.buymeacoffee.com/A4quYdWoM You can find over 3000 philosophy videos in my main YouTube channel - www.youtube.com/user/gbisadler Purchase Max Scheler's Ressentiment - amzn.to/4f3mv18

This lecture discusses key ideas from the 20th century German philosopher, sociologist of knowledge, and phenomenologist, Max Scheler's work Ressentiment, which provides an interpretation of Friedrich Nietzsche's concept of that same name. It focuses on his discussion in the third part of the work "Christian Morality and Ressentment" of the difference between Christian love and modern "altruism" as motivations when it comes to helping others in need To support my ongoing work, go to my Patreon site - www.patreon.com/sadler If you'd like to make a direct contribution, you can do so here - www.paypal.me/ReasonIO - or at BuyMeACoffee - www.buymeacoffee.com/A4quYdWoM You can find over 3000 philosophy videos in my main YouTube channel - www.youtube.com/user/gbisadler Purchase Max Scheler's Ressentiment - amzn.to/4f3mv18

This lecture discusses key ideas from the 20th century German philosopher, sociologist of knowledge, and phenomenologist, Max Scheler's work Ressentiment, which provides an interpretation of Friedrich Nietzsche's concept of that same name. It focuses on his discussion in the third part of the work "Christian Morality and Ressentment" of whether the teachings and example of Jesus of Nazareth is motivated or not by the dynamic of ressentiment. Scheler provides reasons for judging that this is not the case. To support my ongoing work, go to my Patreon site - www.patreon.com/sadler If you'd like to make a direct contribution, you can do so here - www.paypal.me/ReasonIO - or at BuyMeACoffee - www.buymeacoffee.com/A4quYdWoM You can find over 3000 philosophy videos in my main YouTube channel - www.youtube.com/user/gbisadler Purchase Max Scheler's Ressentiment - amzn.to/4f3mv18

Pierre-Michel MengerCollège de FranceAnnée 2023-2024Sociologie du travail créateurColloque - Boulez : l'invention au pouvoir ? Les années 1975-1995 - L'opposition à Boulez, entre ressentiment personnel et contestation d'un modèleSession 5 : Le musicien sur tous les frontsIntervenant :Christian MerlinUniversité de Lille-Nord de FranceColloque organisé pour le centenaire de la naissance de Pierre Boulez par le Pr Pierre-Michel Menger, chaire Sociologie du travail créateur, et Nicolas Donin, professeur de musicologie à l'université de Genève.Avec le soutien de la Fondation du Collège de France et de son grand mécène LVMH.RésuméRien d'étonnant à ce que celui qui s'est construit dans la désobéissance et le refus de l'autorité, ait très tôt vu la sienne contestée. La virulence de l'opposition à Boulez fut à la mesure de l'intransigeance de l'homme et du pouvoir, réel ou fantasmé, qu'on lui prêtait. Nous reviendrons sur les ressorts d'une polarisation de la vie musicale française.Dès les concerts du Domaine musical, fondés en 1954, se dessine une opposition esthétique dont le chef de file le plus actif et brillant est le journaliste du Figaro Bernard Gavoty. L'opposition esthétique s'accompagne d'une opposition institutionnelle : refus de subvention publique au Domaine musical, hostilité du Conseil national de la musique. L'imbrication entre divergences esthétiques, conflit institutionnel et inimitié personnelle culminera dans l'affrontement avec André Jolivet.De lutte entre l'institution (radio, instances gouvernementales) et l'underground (la niche privée du Domaine musical), l'opposition prend dans les années 1960 l'allure d'une lutte au sein-même de l'institution, lorsque, à la suite du ralliement d'André Malraux, Boulez est écouté au ministère, grâce à des relais d'influence comme Gaëtan Picon ou Emile Biasini. Se constitue alors au sein-même du ministère un courant « contre-révolutionnaire », autour de Marcel Landowski. La victoire de celui-ci aboutit en 1966 au départ de Boulez, qui renonce à toute fonction en France.À son retour, dans les années 1970, à l'initiative de Georges Pompidou, l'opposition prend une autre dimension. Jusqu'ici, Boulez contre l'institution, c'était David contre Goliath. Désormais, l'IRCAM, financé par la puissance publique mais aux frontières de l'appareil d'Etat, Boulez ayant posé comme condition de ne pas dépendre directement du ministère, sera non plus dénoncé comme le jouet d'un agitateur culturel à l'influence somme toute circonscrite, mais celui d'un autocrate détenant tous les leviers de la création. L'hostilité ne vient plus seulement de milieux conservateurs attachés à la tonalité, mais aussi d'avant-gardistes s'estimant lésés, comme Iannis Xenakis ou Jean-Claude Eloy.Se rejoignent alors les deux oppositions : celle de l'institution qui entend garder le contrôle de son administration et fustige ce qu'elle considère comme son détournement à des fins personnelles, et celle des anti-modernes, qui prônent un retour à une esthétique plus consonante et dénoncent désormais en Boulez un homme de pouvoir et un compositeur officiel.

This lecture discusses key ideas from the 20th century German philosopher, sociologist of knowledge, and phenomenologist, Max Scheler's work Ressentiment, which provides an interpretation of Friedrich Nietzsche's concept of that same name. It focuses on his discussion in the third part of the work "Christian Morality and Ressentment" of the differing possible motivations for engaging in ascetic actions and judgements, which range from dynamics of ressentiment rightly identified as such by Nietzsche, to educating members of a society for activities like war, to an overflow and abundance of life, to love of one's spiritual self and the desire to perfect and hallow it. To support my ongoing work, go to my Patreon site - www.patreon.com/sadler If you'd like to make a direct contribution, you can do so here - www.paypal.me/ReasonIO - or at BuyMeACoffee - www.buymeacoffee.com/A4quYdWoM You can find over 3000 philosophy videos in my main YouTube channel - www.youtube.com/user/gbisadler Purchase Max Scheler's Ressentiment - amzn.to/4f3mv18

This lecture discusses key ideas from the 20th century German philosopher, sociologist of knowledge, and phenomenologist, Max Scheler's work Ressentiment, which provides an interpretation of Friedrich Nietzsche's concept of that same name. It focuses on his discussion in the third part of the work "Christian Morality and Ressentment" of the connections Scheler sees between the modern conception of "altruism" and the dynamic of ressentiment, which he thinks is involved in modern "altruism". Both altruism and egoism as opposites are often used by modern thinkers as a conceptual framework that Christian love does not neatly fit into, and the reduction of Christian love to "altruism", Scheler thinks, is a mistake. To support my ongoing work, go to my Patreon site - www.patreon.com/sadler If you'd like to make a direct contribution, you can do so here - www.paypal.me/ReasonIO - or at BuyMeACoffee - www.buymeacoffee.com/A4quYdWoM You can find over 3000 philosophy videos in my main YouTube channel - www.youtube.com/user/gbisadler Purchase Max Scheler's Ressentiment - amzn.to/4f3mv18

This lecture discusses key ideas from the 20th century German philosopher, sociologist of knowledge, and phenomenologist, Max Scheler's work Ressentiment, which provides an interpretation of Friedrich Nietzsche's concept of that same name. It focuses on his discussion in the third part of the work "Christian Morality and Ressentment" of the Christian conception of God by contrast to earlier conceptions of God, specifically as infinite love. To support my ongoing work, go to my Patreon site - www.patreon.com/sadler If you'd like to make a direct contribution, you can do so here - www.paypal.me/ReasonIO - or at BuyMeACoffee - www.buymeacoffee.com/A4quYdWoM You can find over 3000 philosophy videos in my main YouTube channel - www.youtube.com/user/gbisadler Purchase Max Scheler's Ressentiment - amzn.to/4f3mv18

This lecture discusses key ideas from the 20th century German philosopher, sociologist of knowledge, and phenomenologist, Max Scheler's work Ressentiment, which provides an interpretation of Friedrich Nietzsche's concept of that same name. It focuses on his discussion in the third part of the work "Christian Morality and Ressentment" of what he calls the "urge to sacrifice" that is an aspect of a healthy vitality and a recognition of strength in vital values. To support my ongoing work, go to my Patreon site - www.patreon.com/sadler If you'd like to make a direct contribution, you can do so here - www.paypal.me/ReasonIO - or at BuyMeACoffee - www.buymeacoffee.com/A4quYdWoM You can find over 3000 philosophy videos in my main YouTube channel - www.youtube.com/user/gbisadler Purchase Max Scheler's Ressentiment - amzn.to/4f3mv18

This lecture discusses key ideas from the 20th century German philosopher, sociologist of knowledge, and phenomenologist, Max Scheler's work Ressentiment, which provides an interpretation of Friedrich Nietzsche's concept of that same name. It focuses on his discussion in the third part of the work "Christian Morality and Ressentment" of the transformation of the conception of love brought about by genuine Christianity, that is, the movement oriented by the teachings and example of Jesus of Nazareth. He contrasts this against the pre-Christian conceptions of love found in Greek and Roman culture. To support my ongoing work, go to my Patreon site - www.patreon.com/sadler If you'd like to make a direct contribution, you can do so here - www.paypal.me/ReasonIO - or at BuyMeACoffee - www.buymeacoffee.com/A4quYdWoM You can find over 3000 philosophy videos in my main YouTube channel - www.youtube.com/user/gbisadler Purchase Max Scheler's Ressentiment - amzn.to/4f3mv18

This lecture discusses key ideas from the 20th century German philosopher, sociologist of knowledge, and phenomenologist, Max Scheler's work Ressentiment, which provides an interpretation of Friedrich Nietzsche's concept of that same name. It focuses on his discussion in the third part of the work "Christian Morality and Ressentment" of pre-Christian Greek and Roman viewpoints on the nature and value of love, looking particularly to philosophers and poets. To support my ongoing work, go to my Patreon site - www.patreon.com/sadler If you'd like to make a direct contribution, you can do so here - www.paypal.me/ReasonIO - or at BuyMeACoffee - www.buymeacoffee.com/A4quYdWoM You can find over 3000 philosophy videos in my main YouTube channel - www.youtube.com/user/gbisadler Purchase Max Scheler's Ressentiment - amzn.to/4f3mv18

This lecture discusses key ideas from the 20th century German philosopher, sociologist of knowledge, and phenomenologist, Max Scheler's work Ressentiment, which provides an interpretation of Friedrich Nietzsche's concept of that same name. It focuses on the very short part 2 of the work, in which Scheler discusses how entire moralities can emerge from ressentiment, and frames issues that will be discussed in the next two parts, namely ressentiment's relation with Christian morality and with modern bourgeois morality To support my ongoing work, go to my Patreon site - www.patreon.com/sadler If you'd like to make a direct contribution, you can do so here - www.paypal.me/ReasonIO - or at BuyMeACoffee - www.buymeacoffee.com/A4quYdWoM You can find over 3000 philosophy videos in my main YouTube channel - www.youtube.com/user/gbisadler Purchase Max Scheler's Ressentiment - amzn.to/4f3mv18

This lecture discusses key ideas from the 20th century German philosopher, sociologist of knowledge, and phenomenologist, Max Scheler's work Ressentiment, which provides an interpretation of Friedrich Nietzsche's concept of that same name. It focuses on his discussion at the end of the first section of how the ressentiment attitude develops by stages into a reversal and perversion of values which contravenes what Scheler calls an eternal hierarchy of values. To support my ongoing work, go to my Patreon site - www.patreon.com/sadler If you'd like to make a direct contribution, you can do so here - www.paypal.me/ReasonIO - or at BuyMeACoffee - www.buymeacoffee.com/A4quYdWoM You can find over 3000 philosophy videos in my main YouTube channel - www.youtube.com/user/gbisadler Purchase Max Scheler's Ressentiment - amzn.to/4f3mv18

This lecture discusses key ideas from the 20th century German philosopher, sociologist of knowledge, and phenomenologist, Max Scheler's work Ressentiment, which provides an interpretation of Friedrich Nietzsche's concept of that same name. It focuses on what Scheler calls "situations charged with the danger of ressentiment", and the ones he considers are women in relation to men, older people in relation to younger, interfamilial and intermarital relations, criminality (with some exceptions), and the situations of many priests. To support my ongoing work, go to my Patreon site - www.patreon.com/sadler If you'd like to make a direct contribution, you can do so here - www.paypal.me/ReasonIO - or at BuyMeACoffee - www.buymeacoffee.com/A4quYdWoM You can find over 3000 philosophy videos in my main YouTube channel - www.youtube.com/user/gbisadler Purchase Max Scheler's Ressentiment - amzn.to/4f3mv18

This lecture discusses key ideas from the 20th century German philosopher, sociologist of knowledge, and phenomenologist, Max Scheler's work Ressentiment, which provides an interpretation of Friedrich Nietzsche's concept of that same name. It focuses on what Scheler identifies as "spiritual varieties of ressentiment, two varieties of which he identifies at the beginning of his discussion, the "apostate" and the "romantic"state of mind. He also discusses ressentiment as involved in "every way of thinking which attributes creative power to mere negation and critique" To support my ongoing work, go to my Patreon site - www.patreon.com/sadler If you'd like to make a direct contribution, you can do so here - www.paypal.me/ReasonIO - or at BuyMeACoffee - www.buymeacoffee.com/A4quYdWoM You can find over 3000 philosophy videos in my main YouTube channel - www.youtube.com/user/gbisadler Purchase Max Scheler's Ressentiment - amzn.to/4f3mv18

This lecture discusses key ideas from the 20th century German philosopher, sociologist of knowledge, and phenomenologist, Max Scheler's work Ressentiment, which provides an interpretation of Friedrich Nietzsche's concept of that same name. It focuses on the ways in which comparison and valuation between oneself and others figures into ressentiment. Scheler thinks that practically everyone engages in comparison with others, but the ways in which one compares oneself and values oneself is very different between the "noble" and "common" types of persons. The latter can also be divided into the arriviste type and the person of ressentiment To support my ongoing work, go to my Patreon site - www.patreon.com/sadler If you'd like to make a direct contribution, you can do so here - www.paypal.me/ReasonIO - or at BuyMeACoffee - www.buymeacoffee.com/A4quYdWoM You can find over 3000 philosophy videos in my main YouTube channel - www.youtube.com/user/gbisadler Purchase Max Scheler's Ressentiment - amzn.to/4f3mv18

This lecture discusses key ideas from the 20th century German philosopher, sociologist of knowledge, and phenomenologist, Max Scheler's work Ressentiment, which provides an interpretation of Friedrich Nietzsche's concept of that same name. It focuses on the connection Scheler analyses between repression and ressentiment. The repression is complex, beginning with repression of the original object of the emotion and leading to changing the emotion and directing it inward to the person feeling it. To support my ongoing work, go to my Patreon site - www.patreon.com/sadler If you'd like to make a direct contribution, you can do so here - www.paypal.me/ReasonIO - or at BuyMeACoffee - www.buymeacoffee.com/A4quYdWoM You can find over 3000 philosophy videos in my main YouTube channel - www.youtube.com/user/gbisadler Purchase Max Scheler's Ressentiment - amzn.to/4f3mv18

This lecture discusses key ideas from the 20th century German philosopher, sociologist of knowledge, and phenomenologist, Max Scheler's work Ressentiment, which provides an interpretation of Friedrich Nietzsche's concept of that same name. It focuses on on his discussion about how "value blindness" and "value delusion" figure into the dynamic of ressentiment. In the course of this discussion, Scheler references his earlier work Formalism in Ethics and Non-Formal Ethics of Values, where he develops these concepts in relation to hierarchies of values. To support my ongoing work, go to my Patreon site - www.patreon.com/sadler If you'd like to make a direct contribution, you can do so here - www.paypal.me/ReasonIO - or at BuyMeACoffee - www.buymeacoffee.com/A4quYdWoM You can find over 3000 philosophy videos in my main YouTube channel - www.youtube.com/user/gbisadler Purchase Max Scheler's Ressentiment - amzn.to/4f3mv18

What can Frantz Fanon and Friedrich Nietzsche teach us about the Israeli/Palestinian conflict?[NOTE: This episode originally aired on October 11, 2024.]This week, we're joined by Zahi Zalloua (Whitman College) to discuss the final chapter of his most recent book The Politics of the Wretched: Race, Reason, and Ressentiment (Bloomsbury, 2024)-- entitled "Zionist ressentiment, the Left, and the Palestinian Question"-- which offers a fresh lens through which to understand the complex affects and power dynamics that continue to fuel this ongoing struggle by focusing on what 19th C. German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche called ressentiment—a deep-seated feeling of injustice and grievance.Zalloua unpacks how a collective sense of moral outrage on the part of Zionists has been deployed to shield Israel from criticism by accusing pro-Palestinian advocates, and the Left more generally, of a “new anti-Semitism.” He contrasts this with Palestinian ressentiment, which he frames as a legitimate response to the ongoing reality of settler-colonialism and displacement. His work both critiques the complicity of liberal Zionism in maintaining the status quo and challenges us to reframe the way we understand both Zionist and Palestinian anger.Full episode notes available at this link:https://hotelbarpodcast.com/podcast/episode-155-the-palestinian-question-with-zahi-zalloua-------------------If you enjoy Hotel Bar Sessions podcast, please be sure to subscribe and submit a rating/review! Better yet, you can support this podcast by signing up to be one of our Patrons at patreon.com/hotelbarsessions!Follow us on Twitter/X @hotelbarpodcast, on Facebook, on TikTok, and subscribe to our YouTube channel!  ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

This lecture discusses key ideas from the 20th century German philosopher, sociologist of knowledge, and phenomenologist, Max Scheler's work Ressentiment, which provides an interpretation of Friedrich Nietzsche's concept of that same name. It focuses on Scheler's analysis of two main sources of ressentiment, namely the desire for revenge, on the one hand, and envy, jealousy, and the competitive impulse. There are other affects that can figure into ressentiment as well, that Scheler identifies, such as hatred, malice, spite, the urge to detract, and schadenfreude. To support my ongoing work, go to my Patreon site - www.patreon.com/sadler If you'd like to make a direct contribution, you can do so here - www.paypal.me/ReasonIO - or at BuyMeACoffee - www.buymeacoffee.com/A4quYdWoM You can find over 3000 philosophy videos in my main YouTube channel - www.youtube.com/user/gbisadler Purchase Max Scheler's Ressentiment - amzn.to/4f3mv18

This lecture discusses key ideas from the 20th century German philosopher, sociologist of knowledge, and phenomenologist, Max Scheler's work Ressentiment, which provides an interpretation of Friedrich Nietzsche's concept of that same name. It focuses on the initial phenomenological description that Scheler develops of the affect and dynamic of ressentiment. To support my ongoing work, go to my Patreon site - www.patreon.com/sadler If you'd like to make a direct contribution, you can do so here - www.paypal.me/ReasonIO - or at BuyMeACoffee - www.buymeacoffee.com/A4quYdWoM You can find over 3000 philosophy videos in my main YouTube channel - www.youtube.com/user/gbisadler Purchase Max Scheler's Ressentiment - https://amzn.to/4f3mv18

Frieder Vogelmann zu den medialen und ökonomischen Bedingungen, politischen Effekten und epistemischen Aspekten demokratischer Öffentlichkeit. Diese Aufnahme fand im Rahmen der Tagung „Politische Öffentlichkeit: Strukturen und Strategien“ an der Universität Erfurt statt. Die Website der Tagung inklusive Programm findet ihr hier: https://www.poloeff.de/ Shownotes Frieder Vogelmanns Website (inklusive einer Liste seiner Publikationen): https://www.frieder-vogelmann.net/public/ Frieder Vogelmann am University College Freiburg: https://www.ucf.uni-freiburg.de/people/chair-in-epistemology-and-theory-of-science/prof-dr-frieder-vogelmann Sektion "Politische Theorie und Ideengeschichte" der Deutschen Vereinigung für Politikwissenschaft: https://www.dvpw.de/gliederung/sektionen/politische-theorie-und-ideengeschichte Website der Doppeltagung "Politische Öffentlichkeit: Strukturen und Strategien": https://www.poloeff.de/ der Account der Doppeltagung auf Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/poloeff.bsky.social Vogelmann, F. (2023). Umkämpfte Wissenschaften – zwischen Idealisierung und Verachtung. Reclam Verlag. https://www.reclam.shop/detail/978-3-15-014359-9/Vogelmann__Frieder/Umkaempfte_Wissenschaften_____zwischen_Idealisierung_und_Verachtung Vogelmann, F. (2022). Die Wirksamkeit des Wissens: Eine politische Epistemologie. Suhrkamp. https://www.suhrkamp.de/buch/frieder-vogelmann-die-wirksamkeit-des-wissens-t-9783518299722 Das erste Zitat im Podcast stammt aus dem Gespräch „Öffentlichkeit - was ist das eigentlich?“ zwischen Theodor W. Adorno und Arnold Gehlen, welches am 18. März 1964 zum ersten Mal gesendet wurde. https://youtu.be/K7WokFmA2kw?si=xC_3K0L3eEk5p4ah Vogl, J. (2021). Kapital und Ressentiment. Eine kurze Theorie der Gegenwart. C.H.Beck. https://www.chbeck.de/vogl-kapitalismus-ressentiment/product/32045602 zu Rupert Murdoch: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rupert_Murdoch die taz: https://taz.de/ Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1992). Tausend Plateaus: Kapitalismus und Schizophrenie. Merve Verlag. https://www.merve.de/index.php/book/show/211 zu Carl Schmitt: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Schmitt Jäger, A. (2023). Hyperpolitik. Extreme Politisierung ohne politische Folgen. Suhrkamp. https://www.suhrkamp.de/buch/anton-jaeger-hyperpolitik-t-9783518127971 Paul, M. (2025). Faschismus als Lustgewinn. Berlin Review. https://blnreview.de/ausgaben/2025-03/morten-paul-faschismus-als-lustgewinn Brown, W. (2023). Nihilistische Zeiten. Denken mit Max Weber. Suhrkamp. https://www.suhrkamp.de/buch/wendy-brown-nihilistische-zeiten-t-9783518588031 Loick, D., & Thompson, V. E. (Hrsg.). (2022). Abolitionismus: Ein Reader. Suhrkamp. https://www.suhrkamp.de/buch/abolitionismus-t-9783518299647 Kurt, Ş. (2023). Hass. Von der Macht eines widerständigen Gefühls. HarperCollins. https://www.harpercollins.de/products/hass-von-der-macht-eines-widerstandigen-gefuhls-9783365001585 Comey, J. (2019). How Trump Co-opts Leaders Like Bill Barr. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/01/opinion/william-barr-testimony.html Löwenthal, L. (2021). Falsche Propheten: Studien zur faschistischen Agitation. Suhrkamp. https://www.suhrkamp.de/buch/leo-loewenthal-falsche-propheten-t-9783518587621 Landa, I. (2021). Der Lehrling und sein Meister. Liberale Tradition und Faschismus. Dietz Verlag. https://dietzberlin.de/produkt/der-lehrling-und-sein-meister/ Ronge, B. (2015). Eine Genealogie des Liberalismus. Michel Foucaults Vorlesungen zur Geschichte der Gouvernementalität. In: Das Adam-Smith-Projekt. Edition Theorie und Kritik. Springer VS. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-658-06027-5_2#citeas von Redecker, E. (2020). Revolution für das Leben: Philosophie der neuen Protestformen. S. Fischer. https://www.fischerverlage.de/buch/eva-von-redecker-revolution-fuer-das-leben-9783596708048   Thematisch angrenzende Folgen S03E28 | Sylke van Dyk zu alternativer Gouvernementalität https://www.futurehistories.today/episoden-blog/s03/e28-silke-van-dyk-zu-alternativer-gouvernementalitaet/ S03E19 | Wendy Brown on socialist Governmentality https://www.futurehistories.today/episoden-blog/s03/e19-wendy-brown-on-socialist-governmentality/ S02E56 | Şeyda Kurt zu strategischem Hass https://www.futurehistories.today/episoden-blog/s02/e56-seyda-kurt-zu-strategischem-hass/ S02E54 | Alex Demirovic zu zu sozialistischer Gouvernementalität, (Re-)produktion und Rätedemokratie (Teil 2) https://www.futurehistories.today/episoden-blog/s02/e54-alex-demirovic-zu-sozialistischer-gouvernementalitaet-re-produktion-und-raetedemokratie-teil-2/ S02E53 | Alex Demirovic zu zu sozialistischer Gouvernementalität, (Re-)produktion und Rätedemokratie (Teil 1) https://www.futurehistories.today/episoden-blog/s02/e53-alex-demirovic-zu-sozialistischer-gouvernementalitaet-re-produktion-und-raetedemokratie-teil-1/ S02E08 | Thomas Biebricher zu neoliberaler Regierungskunst https://www.futurehistories.today/episoden-blog/s02/e08-thomas-biebricher-zu-neoliberaler-regierungskunst/ S02E03 | Ute Tellmann zu Ökonomie als Kultur https://www.futurehistories.today/episoden-blog/s02/e03-ute-tellmann-zu-oekonomie-als-kultur/ S01E37 | Eva von Redecker zur Revolution für das Leben https://www.futurehistories.today/episoden-blog/s01/e37-eva-von-redecker-zur-revolution-fuer-das-leben/ S01E29 | Thorsten Thiel zu Demokratie in der digitalen Konstellation https://www.futurehistories.today/episoden-blog/s01/e29-thorsten-thiel-zu-demokratie-in-der-digitalen-konstellation/ S01E25 | Joseph Vogl zur Krise des Regierens https://www.futurehistories.today/episoden-blog/s01/e25-joseph-vogl-zur-krise-des-regierens/ S01E11 | Frieder Vogelmann zu alternativen Regierungskünsten https://www.futurehistories.today/episoden-blog/s01/e11-frieder-vogelmann-zu-alternativen-regierungskuensten/ S01E09 | Susanne Grof-Korbel zu PR, Warhheit & Journalismus https://www.futurehistories.today/episoden-blog/s01/e09-susanne-grof-korbel-zu-pr-wahrheit-journalismus/ Future Histories Kontakt & Unterstützung Wenn euch Future Histories gefällt, dann erwägt doch bitte eine Unterstützung auf Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/join/FutureHistories   Schreibt mir unter: office@futurehistories.today Diskutiert mit mir auf Twitter (#FutureHistories): https://twitter.com/FutureHpodcast auf Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/futurehistories.bsky.social auf Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/futurehpodcast/ auf Mastodon: https://mstdn.social/@FutureHistories   Webseite mit allen Folgen: www.futurehistories.today English webpage: https://futurehistories-international.com   Episode Keywords #FriederVogelmann, #JanGroos, #FutureHistories, #Podcast, #Interview, #Öffentlichkeit, #Adorno, #Medien, #KritischeTheorie, #FrankfurterSchule, #JosephVogl, #Faschismus, #Faschisierung, #Ressentiment, #Liberalismus, #Kapitalismus, #Ökonomie, #PolitischeÖkonomie, #FakeNews, #Journalismus, #Demokratie, #Demokratietheorie

durée : 00:48:27 - Grand bien vous fasse ! - par : Ali Rebeihi - Jalousie, mensonge, colère, paresse, envie, ressentiment, haine, peur… Les "passions dangereuses" sont au cœur du nouvel ouvrage de Guillaume Le Blanc, le philosophe l'affirme : c'est le monde dans lequel nous vivons qui nous rend tristes.

Ryder Richards discusses the evolution and degradation of the concept of "good" in moral language, referencing Nietzsche, Shell, and McIntyre. Nietzsche argues that "good" originated as a term for nobility but was inverted by the oppressed into a virtue of meekness. Shell suggests that modern morality has been corrupted by utility, aligning with capitalism and democracy. McIntyre claims that modern society suffers from moral fragmentation, rendering ethical discussions incoherent. Richards ties these ideas to Orwell's 1984, emphasizing the structural collapse of language and the futility of moral progress in modern culture wars. He concludes that the concept of "good" has lost its original meaning and is now used without clear definition. 

Intellectuels, chefs d'entreprises, artistes, hommes et femmes politiques… Frédéric Taddeï reçoit des personnalités de tous horizons pour éclairer différemment et prendre du recul sur l'actualité de la semaine écoulée le samedi. Même recette le dimanche pour anticiper la semaine à venir. Un rendez-vous emblématique pour mieux comprendre l'air du temps et la complexité de notre monde.

Chaque jour dans l'Heure des pros, Pascal Praud livre son édito sur l'actualité du moment. Aujourd'hui, il revient sur les propos de Patrick Cohen qui s'est attaqué à CNews. Vous voulez réagir ? Appelez-le 01.80.20.39.21 (numéro non surtaxé) ou rendez-vous sur les réseaux sociaux d'Europe 1 pour livrer votre opinion et débattre sur grandes thématiques développées dans l'émission du jour.

The Politics of the Wretched: Race, Reason, and Ressentiment (Bloomsbury 2024) argues for ressentiment's generative negativity, prompting a shift from ressentiment as a personal expression of frustration to ressentiment as a collective “No”. Inspired by Kant and Nietzsche's philosophy, Zalloua identifies two modes of deploying ressentiment – private and public use – by substituting ressentiment for reason. This reinterpretation argues for a public use of ressentiment, for the wretched to universalize their grievances, to see their antagonism as cutting across societies, and to turn personal trauma into a common cause. A public use of ressentiment rails against the ideology of identity and victimhood and insists on ressentiment's generative negativity, its own rationality, prompting a shift from ressentiment as a personal expression of frustration to ressentiment as a collective “No”. Reframing ressentiment as a tool to oppose the evils of capitalism, anti-Blackness, and neocolonialism, it both alarms the liberal gatekeepers of the status quo and promises to energize the anti-racist Left in its ongoing struggles for universal justice and emancipation. Zahi Zalloua is Cushing Eells Professor of Philosophy and Literature and a Professor of Indigeneity, Race, and Ethnicity Studies at Whitman College and Editor of The Comparatist. His most recent work includes Solidarity and the Palestinian Cause: Indigeneity, Blackness, and the Promise of Universality (2023), Being Posthuman: Ontologies of the Future (2021), Žižek on Race: Toward an Anti- Racist Future (2020), Theory's Autoimmunity: Skepticism, Literature, and Philosophy (2018), and Continental Philosophy and the Palestinian Question: Beyond the Jew and the Greek (2017). Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

The Politics of the Wretched: Race, Reason, and Ressentiment (Bloomsbury 2024) argues for ressentiment's generative negativity, prompting a shift from ressentiment as a personal expression of frustration to ressentiment as a collective “No”. Inspired by Kant and Nietzsche's philosophy, Zalloua identifies two modes of deploying ressentiment – private and public use – by substituting ressentiment for reason. This reinterpretation argues for a public use of ressentiment, for the wretched to universalize their grievances, to see their antagonism as cutting across societies, and to turn personal trauma into a common cause. A public use of ressentiment rails against the ideology of identity and victimhood and insists on ressentiment's generative negativity, its own rationality, prompting a shift from ressentiment as a personal expression of frustration to ressentiment as a collective “No”. Reframing ressentiment as a tool to oppose the evils of capitalism, anti-Blackness, and neocolonialism, it both alarms the liberal gatekeepers of the status quo and promises to energize the anti-racist Left in its ongoing struggles for universal justice and emancipation. Zahi Zalloua is Cushing Eells Professor of Philosophy and Literature and a Professor of Indigeneity, Race, and Ethnicity Studies at Whitman College and Editor of The Comparatist. His most recent work includes Solidarity and the Palestinian Cause: Indigeneity, Blackness, and the Promise of Universality (2023), Being Posthuman: Ontologies of the Future (2021), Žižek on Race: Toward an Anti- Racist Future (2020), Theory's Autoimmunity: Skepticism, Literature, and Philosophy (2018), and Continental Philosophy and the Palestinian Question: Beyond the Jew and the Greek (2017). Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science

The Politics of the Wretched: Race, Reason, and Ressentiment (Bloomsbury 2024) argues for ressentiment's generative negativity, prompting a shift from ressentiment as a personal expression of frustration to ressentiment as a collective “No”. Inspired by Kant and Nietzsche's philosophy, Zalloua identifies two modes of deploying ressentiment – private and public use – by substituting ressentiment for reason. This reinterpretation argues for a public use of ressentiment, for the wretched to universalize their grievances, to see their antagonism as cutting across societies, and to turn personal trauma into a common cause. A public use of ressentiment rails against the ideology of identity and victimhood and insists on ressentiment's generative negativity, its own rationality, prompting a shift from ressentiment as a personal expression of frustration to ressentiment as a collective “No”. Reframing ressentiment as a tool to oppose the evils of capitalism, anti-Blackness, and neocolonialism, it both alarms the liberal gatekeepers of the status quo and promises to energize the anti-racist Left in its ongoing struggles for universal justice and emancipation. Zahi Zalloua is Cushing Eells Professor of Philosophy and Literature and a Professor of Indigeneity, Race, and Ethnicity Studies at Whitman College and Editor of The Comparatist. His most recent work includes Solidarity and the Palestinian Cause: Indigeneity, Blackness, and the Promise of Universality (2023), Being Posthuman: Ontologies of the Future (2021), Žižek on Race: Toward an Anti- Racist Future (2020), Theory's Autoimmunity: Skepticism, Literature, and Philosophy (2018), and Continental Philosophy and the Palestinian Question: Beyond the Jew and the Greek (2017). Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/critical-theory

The Politics of the Wretched: Race, Reason, and Ressentiment (Bloomsbury 2024) argues for ressentiment's generative negativity, prompting a shift from ressentiment as a personal expression of frustration to ressentiment as a collective “No”. Inspired by Kant and Nietzsche's philosophy, Zalloua identifies two modes of deploying ressentiment – private and public use – by substituting ressentiment for reason. This reinterpretation argues for a public use of ressentiment, for the wretched to universalize their grievances, to see their antagonism as cutting across societies, and to turn personal trauma into a common cause. A public use of ressentiment rails against the ideology of identity and victimhood and insists on ressentiment's generative negativity, its own rationality, prompting a shift from ressentiment as a personal expression of frustration to ressentiment as a collective “No”. Reframing ressentiment as a tool to oppose the evils of capitalism, anti-Blackness, and neocolonialism, it both alarms the liberal gatekeepers of the status quo and promises to energize the anti-racist Left in its ongoing struggles for universal justice and emancipation. Zahi Zalloua is Cushing Eells Professor of Philosophy and Literature and a Professor of Indigeneity, Race, and Ethnicity Studies at Whitman College and Editor of The Comparatist. His most recent work includes Solidarity and the Palestinian Cause: Indigeneity, Blackness, and the Promise of Universality (2023), Being Posthuman: Ontologies of the Future (2021), Žižek on Race: Toward an Anti- Racist Future (2020), Theory's Autoimmunity: Skepticism, Literature, and Philosophy (2018), and Continental Philosophy and the Palestinian Question: Beyond the Jew and the Greek (2017). Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/intellectual-history

The Politics of the Wretched: Race, Reason, and Ressentiment (Bloomsbury 2024) argues for ressentiment's generative negativity, prompting a shift from ressentiment as a personal expression of frustration to ressentiment as a collective “No”. Inspired by Kant and Nietzsche's philosophy, Zalloua identifies two modes of deploying ressentiment – private and public use – by substituting ressentiment for reason. This reinterpretation argues for a public use of ressentiment, for the wretched to universalize their grievances, to see their antagonism as cutting across societies, and to turn personal trauma into a common cause. A public use of ressentiment rails against the ideology of identity and victimhood and insists on ressentiment's generative negativity, its own rationality, prompting a shift from ressentiment as a personal expression of frustration to ressentiment as a collective “No”. Reframing ressentiment as a tool to oppose the evils of capitalism, anti-Blackness, and neocolonialism, it both alarms the liberal gatekeepers of the status quo and promises to energize the anti-racist Left in its ongoing struggles for universal justice and emancipation. Zahi Zalloua is Cushing Eells Professor of Philosophy and Literature and a Professor of Indigeneity, Race, and Ethnicity Studies at Whitman College and Editor of The Comparatist. His most recent work includes Solidarity and the Palestinian Cause: Indigeneity, Blackness, and the Promise of Universality (2023), Being Posthuman: Ontologies of the Future (2021), Žižek on Race: Toward an Anti- Racist Future (2020), Theory's Autoimmunity: Skepticism, Literature, and Philosophy (2018), and Continental Philosophy and the Palestinian Question: Beyond the Jew and the Greek (2017). Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/politics-and-polemics

In der aktuellen Folge des Podcast „Deutschland, Du kannst das.“ spricht Host Holger Klein mit dem Literatur- und Medienwissenschaftler Joseph Vogl über den Einfluss von Plattformunternehmen wie Meta, X oder Amazon auf politische Entscheidungsprozesse. Vogl erkennt vor allem in den USA eine gefährliche Verflechtung zwischen privaten finanzwirtschaftlichen Interessen und öffentlichen Institutionen, die jedoch auch für Europa stilbildend werden könnte. Es gehe „diesen Unternehmungen nicht darum, den Staat schlanker zu machen“, so Vogl, sondern „es geht darum, mehr staatliche Aufgaben zu privatisieren.“ Es sei damit eine quasi vierte Gewalt aufgetreten. „Neben der Legislative, neben der Judikative und neben der Exekutive kann man, wenn man so will, eine monetative Gewalt erkennen“, so Vogl, „die nicht zuletzt auch durch die Stützung und die Mitwirkung von Zentralbanken eine vierte Gewalt innerhalb des Regierungssystems darstellt.“ Eine derartige Entwicklung könne zu einer Erosion von Demokratie und sozialer Verantwortung führen, warnt Vogl. Soziale Medien werden immer mehr zur Hauptquelle der Information für die Gesellschaft. Traditionelle Medien geraten zusehends in die Defensive. Beides - der Einfluss privater Unternehmen im politischen Bereich, kombiniert mit der Monopolbildung in der Medienlandschaft – ,wirft Fragen über die Zukunft der demokratischen Gesellschaft und des Sozialstaats auf. Es sei daher entscheidend, den gesellschaftlichen Diskurs zu verändern und strikter gegen die Erosion sozialer Sicherheitsnetze vorzugehen. Vogl fordert permanente öffentliche Diskussion, Reflexion und Engagement, um zu einem ausgewogenen Sozialstaat zurückkehren zu können. Eine große Bedeutung kommt für Joseph Vogl dem Ressentiment als politische Ressource zu. Aktuelle Debatten um Migrationsfragen belegen dies. Vogl weist aber auch darauf hin, dass „die ‚Ausländerwahlkämpfe‘ keine Erfindung von Rechtsextremen, sondern die Erfindung der sogenannten christlichen Parteien in Deutschland waren.“ Eine Entwicklung, die bis in die Gegenwart des derzeitigen Wahlkampfs hineinführt, „in der die Positionen auf diesem Gebiet von Unionsparteien einerseits und der AfD auf der anderen Seite vollständig verwechselbar geworden sind.“

Le doute, la rumeur, le ressentiment. C'est à cause de ce cocktail toxique qu'est morte au printemps 2012 Maeva Rousseau, une jeune maman innocente. Tuée sous les yeux de son tout petit garçon, âgé seulement de onze mois. Dans cette affaire, les enquêteurs vont se demander pourquoi cette femme avait été ainsi massacrée. Pas de vol, pas de viol, pas de mobile apparent. Jusqu'à ce qu'ils découvrent les mécanismes cachés de cet assassinat. Une vieille histoire, tragique, qui n'avait cesser de bouillonner et venait soudain de remonter à la surface. Retrouvez tous les jours en podcast le décryptage d'un faits divers, d'un crime ou d'une énigme judiciaire par Jean-Alphonse Richard, entouré de spécialistes, et de témoins d'affaires criminelles. Ecoutez L'heure du Crime avec Jean-Alphonse Richard du 14 novembre 2024.

In 18th century America, this book was second in popularity only to the Bible.It was a favorite of many thinkers and leaders throughout history, including Emerson, Napoleon, Machiavelli, Nietzsche, and even President Truman.Yet, you probably haven't read it.It's Plutarch's Parallel Lives.If you're not familiar with Plutarch's Lives, you're in for a treat, as today's episode offers a great intro. My guest, Alex Petkas, found that even though he's a former classicist and professor, Plutarch's Lives is still a tough read, which is why he started a podcast, The Cost of Glory, to make it more accessible to people. He does the same thing on today's episode, sharing the background on Plutarch's set of biographies and its major themes. Alex explains why Plutarch thought that biography was a powerful way to transmit morals and how the Homeric virtue he had in mind differed from that of just having good, upstanding character. Alex then gives us a taste of Plutarch as we discuss the lives of two obscure Greek and Roman figures. We end our conversation with how to get started studying Plutarch yourself.Resources Related to the PodcastCost of Glory websiteAlex's resource on how to read Plutarch's Lives, with links to the mentioned Penguin editionsAlex's recommended episodes of the Cost of Glory podcast:Pompey I: Kid ButcherCrassus I: Richest Man in RomeAoM Article: An Intro to EnvyAoM Article: Envy, Ressentiment, and the Inversion of ValuesAoM Podcast #949: Unpacking The Emotion No One Likes to Talk AboutSullaEumenesSertoriusBlood and Thunder: The Epic Story of Kit Carson and the Conquest of the American West by Hampton Sides + AoM podcast episode about the bookConnect with Alex PetkasAlex on LinkedInAlex on XAlex on IG

To celebrate Halloween, Jason goes on the Keen On show hosted by friend of the Disorder Pod, Andrew Keen, to talk about America's spooky election and the crazy conspiracy theories that are floating around this election cycle. What does it really mean when people say the 2020 election was stolen or that Bill Gates implants people with microchips via their Covid Vaccines?      Conspiracy theories are not only, not new, they are a core part of how campaigns of social change are articulated. The more radical the change – the French Revolution, the rise of Hitler, or Trump's election—the more paramount the need for conspiracy theories to motivate the required action need to bring it about. Given his recent study of the phenomenon, Jason articulates his view that the conspiratorial rhetoric around this election embodies a new ‘us vs. them' turn in American political life. He urges Andrew and listeners to Read beneath the surface! And Unpack the True hidden meaning of the conspiracy!    Pointing to his New European Article (published this week), Jason concludes: Conspiracy theories are a socially acceptable way of articulating a Politics of Ressentiment – of pitting groups against each other. Just like Brexit, Trump has signalled that he will ‘take back control' from the minorities, Jews, uppity feminists, transgender activists, immigrants, urban lawyers, and all the other groups you hate and feel have too much power. Spooky indeed!    Show Notes Links    Read Jason's New European Article here: https://www.theneweuropean.co.uk/a-lizard-persons-guide-to-us-election-conspiracy-theories/     And revisit last week's Disorder episode 76, ‘The System is Rigged: Conspiracy theories and the revenge of the losers' with Joe Uscinski here:  https://open.spotify.com/episode/2nvlI3hR1VFyMbgKaZddyi    Check out Andrew Keen's Substack here: https://keenon.substack.com/     Listen to Andrew podcast on Spotify here: https://open.spotify.com/show/1kkWdvi3xdG7JvTbQ0l9Ho     And one of his fun episodes on Intellectual Objectivity here: https://keenon.substack.com/p/in-defense-of-geeky-intellectuals   Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

What can Frantz Fanon and Friedrich Nietzsche teach us about the Israeli/Palestinian conflict?This week, we're joined by Zahi Zalloua (Whitman College) to discuss the final chapter of his most recent book The Politics of the Wretched: Race, Reason, and Ressentiment (Bloomsbury, 2024)-- entitled "Zionist ressentiment, the Left, and the Palestinian Question"-- which offers a fresh lens through which to understand the complex affects and power dynamics that continue to fuel this ongoing struggle by focusing on what 19th C. German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche called ressentiment—a deep-seated feeling of injustice and grievance.Zalloua unpacks how a collective sense of moral outrage on the part of Zionists has been deployed to shield Israel from criticism by accusing pro-Palestinian advocates, and the Left more generally, of a “new anti-Semitism.” He contrasts this with Palestinian ressentiment, which he frames as a legitimate response to the ongoing reality of settler-colonialism and displacement. His work both critiques the complicity of liberal Zionism in maintaining the status quo and challenges us to reframe the way we understand both Zionist and Palestinian anger.Full episode notes available at this link:https://hotelbarpodcast.com/podcast/episode-155-the-palestinian-question-with-zahi-zalloua-------------------If you enjoy Hotel Bar Sessions podcast, please be sure to subscribe and submit a rating/review! Better yet, you can support this podcast by signing up to be one of our Patrons at patreon.com/hotelbarsessions!Follow us on Twitter/X @hotelbarpodcast, on Facebook, on TikTok, and subscribe to our YouTube channel! 

Gary discusses the economic nonsense being discussed and "promised" by a certain presidential campaign. Socialists breed envy and what Herbert Schlossberg called "ressentiment" (see Idols for Destruction pp. 51-54) by encouraging voters to go after the "rich" and big businesses. This tactic ultimately hurts the very people is claims to help by causing both higher taxes and prices.  Read Leonard Read's important article "I, Pencil" here: https://fee.org/ebooks/i-pencil/  

Die sogenannte deutsch-französische ‘Erbfeindschaft‘ – in den frühen Jahren der Weimarer Republik stand sie in schrecklicher Blüte. Spätestens seit der französischen Ruhrbesetzung im Frühjahr 1923 fungierte Franzosenhass als kleinster gemeinsamer politischer Nenner bis weit in die bürgerliche Mitte und brach sich nahezu täglich auch in ungezählten Zeitungsartikeln Bahn. Nach anderen Erzählungen über Frankreich muss man selbst in der sozialdemokratischen Presse eher suchen – aber am 16. August 1924 wurden wir im Hamburger Echo fündig! Der Autor Kurt Lenz blickt dort nach Reims und erinnert nicht nur an die brutale Zerstörung dieser alten französischen Krönungsstadt durch deutsche Truppen zu Beginn des Ersten Weltkrieges. Er berichtet auch über den mühseligen Wiederaufbau – und trifft hier auf erstaunlich wenig anti-deutsches Ressentiment. Es liest Frank Riede.

Cliquez ici pour accéder gratuitement aux articles lus de Mediapart : https://m.audiomeans.fr/s/P-UmoTbNLs Une campagne douloureuse, une défaite qui l'est encore plus, le retour brutal à la vie normale… D'anciens députés de la majorité présidentielle racontent à Mediapart comment ils ont vécu cette période… Et n'épargnent plus celui par qui tout est arrivé. Un article de Pauline Graulle, publié le 16 juillet 2024, lu par Christine Pâris.

In gesellschaftlichen und politischen Diskursen ist aktuell wieder viel von Ressentiments die Rede. Ressentiments haben eine gesellschaftliche und eine politische Bedeutung. Welche Rolle spielen Ressentiments in Diskursen? Darüber diskutiert Jürgen Wiebicke mit dem Philosophen Jürgen Große. Von Ulrich Noller.

Today the Pugs react to an article in New Oxford Review entitled, "How Cowardice, the Herd Mind & Twitter Mobs Threaten Academia by Jason M. Morgan and Mark Ramseyer. If you're still under the impression that higher education is a disinterested pursuit of truth, think again. It has been reduced to political advocacy and ressentiment. (Yes, that's spelled correctly--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ressentiment.) Morgan and Ramseyer had the temerity to correct conventional wisdom on something known as "the Comfort Women" of World War 2. There's no space here to treat this fully, but suffice it to say their scholarship was not received warmly by academic feminists. This resulted in a campaign to get them both cancelled. We're happy to report the cancelation failed. But the whole sorry episode has at least given the Pugs something to reflect upon. Article Referenced: https://www.newoxfordreview.org/documents/how-cowardice-the-herd-mind-twitter-mobs-threaten-academia/ Support the Pugcast on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/thetheologypugcast?fbclid=IwAR17UHhfzjphO52C_kkZfursA_C784t0ldFix0wyB4fd-YOJpmOQ3dyqGf8 The Theology Pugcast is a ministry of Trinity Reformed Church in Huntsville Alabama. To view more media from TRC, visit their website: https://trinityreformedkirk.com/trc-media/

Today the Pugs react to an article in New Oxford Review entitled, "How Cowardice, the Herd Mind & Twitter Mobs Threaten Academia by Jason M. Morgan and Mark Ramseyer. If you're still under the impression that higher education is a disinterested pursuit of truth, think again. It has been reduced to political advocacy and ressentiment. (Yes, that's spelled correctly--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ressentiment.) Morgan and Ramseyer had the temerity to correct conventional wisdom on something known as "the Comfort Women" of World War 2. There's no space here to treat this fully, but suffice it to say their scholarship was not received warmly by academic feminists. This resulted in a campaign to get them both cancelled. We're happy to report the cancelation failed. But the whole sorry episode has at least given the Pugs something to reflect upon. Article Referenced: https://www.newoxfordreview.org/documents/how-cowardice-the-herd-mind-twitter-mobs-threaten-academia/ Support the Pugcast on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/thetheologypugcast?fbclid=IwAR17UHhfzjphO52C_kkZfursA_C784t0ldFix0wyB4fd-YOJpmOQ3dyqGf8 The Theology Pugcast is a ministry of Trinity Reformed Church in Huntsville Alabama. To view more media from TRC, visit their website: https://trinityreformedkirk.com/trc-media/

Today the Pugs react to an article in New Oxford Review entitled, "How Cowardice, the Herd Mind & Twitter Mobs Threaten Academia by Jason M. Morgan and Mark Ramseyer. If you're still under the impression that higher education is a disinterested pursuit of truth, think again. It has been reduced to political advocacy and ressentiment. (Yes, that's spelled correctly--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ressentiment.) Morgan and Ramseyer had the temerity to correct conventional wisdom on something known as "the Comfort Women" of World War 2. There's no space here to treat this fully, but suffice it to say their scholarship was not received warmly by academic feminists. This resulted in a campaign to get them both cancelled. We're happy to report the cancelation failed. But the whole sorry episode has at least given the Pugs something to reflect upon. Article Referenced: https://www.newoxfordreview.org/documents/how-cowardice-the-herd-mind-twitter-mobs-threaten-academia/ Support the Pugcast on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/thetheologypugcast?fbclid=IwAR17UHhfzjphO52C_kkZfursA_C784t0ldFix0wyB4fd-YOJpmOQ3dyqGf8 The Theology Pugcast is a ministry of Trinity Reformed Church in Huntsville Alabama. To view more media from TRC, visit their website: https://trinityreformedkirk.com/trc-media/

La médisance est un phénomène extrêmement répandu, auquel pourtant les philosophes s'intéressent assez peu. Or, se pourrait-il que notre besoin de rabaisser les autres nous renseigne sur notre identité philosophique et sur notre rapport au monde ? C'est en tout cas l'hypothèse proposée par Nietzsche, qui voit dans la médisance l'expression d'une tendance humaine fondamentale : le ressentiment. Analyse de cette conception.

In this second part of our exploration of Deleuze, we go straight into the Deleuzian understanding of ressentiment, and the significance of Nietzsche's distinction between ressentiment and the bad conscience. Deleuze's interpretation is predominantly psychological/physiological, and he sees the origins of ressentiment in the "inverted image" produced by reactive forces. Ressentiment therefore does not emerge from a historical power relationship, but from the disruption, degeneration or failures of the active force of memory to regulate the reactive consciousness and unconsciousness. Deleuze describes four forms of nihilism in Nietzsche: negative, reactive, passive and active, and we'll examine how they progress and relate to one another. Towards the end of the talk, we'll consider the camel, lion and child but with fresh eyes, given all that Deleuze has established. Of chief concern is how the triumph of reactive forces can be reversed, and the great becoming-reactive that characterizes human history turned into a becoming-active. This episode will not make much sense unless you've listened to the first part, in episode #79, as the concepts contained here depend on an understanding of active and reactive, sense and value, genealogy, and differential metaphysics, all of which are covered in that episode.

Of all the emotions, there's one that people are arguably the most reluctant to talk about and admit to feeling.Envy.Not only is there very little social discussion of envy, but there's also been very little academic scholarship on the topic. As a result, few people really understand this emotion — what it is, why they feel it, and what it means in their life.Today we'll reveal the fascinating dimensions of the green-eyed monster with one of the few people who has given a lot of thought and study to this oft-neglected but important subject: Sara Protasi, a professor of philosophy and the author of The Philosophy of Envy. Today on the show, Sara defines envy and explains how it's different from jealousy and why people are more comfortable admitting to feeling jealous than envious. Sara then unpacks what she thinks are the four types of envy, and we work our way from the worst type to a kind that is actually redeemable and potentially beneficial. We end our conversation with how envy, something that's often considered the worst kind of vice, can, in fact, be used to achieve more excellence in your life.Resources Related to the PodcastAoM Article: An Intro on EnvyAoM Article: Envy, Ressentiment, and the Inversion of ValuesAoM Article: The Insidious Disguises of EnvyScene from Mississippi Burning — My Daddy Killed That MuleConnect With Sara ProtasiSara's websiteSara's faculty pageSara on PhilPapersSara on FacebookSara on X

Pastor Alan R. Knapp discusses the topic of "Beware of Ressentiment: The Bitter Root" in his series entitled "Hebrews 2020: We See Jesus" This is Increment 319 and it focuses on the following verses: Hebrews 12:15