Podcast appearances and mentions of max scheler

Un saludo queridos amigos y oyentes. Hoy comparto con vosotros la primera parte del pensamiento de Max Scheler, un filósofo nacido en Baviera en el siglo XIX y que hizo interesantes contribuciones en el campo de la ética, criticando con especial tesón a Kant. 📗ÍNDICE 0. Resúmenes. 1. VIDA Y OBRA. 2. CRÍTICA DE KANT. 3. JERARQUÍA DE LOS VALORES MATERIALES. AQUÍ https://go.ivoox.com/rf/136448677 puedes escuchar una introducción a la Fenomenología. 🎼Música de la época: 📀 Variaciones para orquesta Op. 31 de Arnold Schoenberg, estrenada en diciembre de 1928, el mismo año en que falleció Scheler. 🎨Imagen: Max Scheler (Múnich -Reino de Baviera- 22 de agosto de 1874-Fráncfort del Meno -república de Weimar- 19 de mayo de 1928) fue un filósofo alemán conocido por sus trabajos sobre fenomenología, ética y antropología filosófica. 👍Pulsen un Me Gusta y colaboren a partir de 2,99 €/mes si se lo pueden permitir para asegurar la permanencia del programa ¡Muchas gracias a todos!

Bienvenid@s al tercer episodio de la saga “Una historia con propósito”. Hoy hablaré sobre los 6 escenarios que plantea Max Scheler para encontrarle valor al sentido de la vida. Cualquier escenario es correcto, podemos diversificar o escoger uno donde nos sintamos más cómodos, pero mi recomendación es: NO PONGAS tu escenario en una sola canasta, ¿Qué pasara mañana si ella llegara a quebrarse?, tu sentido de vida seguramente se perdería, es por ello que tener varias canastas que llenen nuestra vida de todo lo valioso nos permitirá a seguir disfrutando de la vida cuando falte una. Disfruta los otros episodios de la saga aquí

ueria saber sobre o Marx Scheller, ele é filosofo cristão?

Welcome to Lily: The Voice of Alice von Hildebrand. In this episode, Lily discusses her book, The Soul of a Lion, a marvelous telling of her husband Dietrich von Hildebrand's life, including his intellectual development under Adolf Reinach, Edmund Husserl, and Max Scheler, as well as his Catholic conversion, and public anti-Nazi resistance. To purchase a copy of The Soul of a Lion, click here: https://amzn.to/2VOfJUg. Get our newsletter and other important updates: https://hildebrandproject.org/#newsletter Become a monthly donor! Visit hildebrandproject.org/giving Follow us on Social Media Instagram: instagram.com/hildebrand_project YouTube: youtube.com/@TheHildebrandLegacy Twitter: twitter.com/HildebrandPrj Facebook: facebook.com/Hildebrandproject #DietrichVonHildebrand #Phenomenology #Personalism #Philosophy #EdmundHusserl #MaxScheler #AdolfReinach #AntiNazism #AntiNationalism

Convegno annuale dell'Associazione Italiana di Storia del Pensiero Politico “Le forme e le culture della guerra”(29 - 30 settembre 2023)In collaborazione con la Scuola Superiore di Studi Storici Università di San MarinoResponsabili scientifici Francesco Tuccari, Paulo Butti de Lima, il Direttivo AISPPALBERTO CASTELLI - MAX SCHELER E LA PRIMA GUERRA MONDIALEPodcast a cura di Giuseppe GiardiUna produzione Usmaradio - Centro di Ricerca per la RadiofoniaUniversità deglli Studi della Repubblica di San MarinoAssociazione Italiana di Storia del Pensiero Politico

Welcome to Lily: The Voice of Alice von Hildebrand. In this episode, Lily discusses Dietrich von Hildebrand's book The Heart with Doug Keck on EWTN Bookmark. In The Heart, Dietrich makes one of his most significant contributions to philosophy via phenomenology: a thorough look at human and divine affectivity. Lily discusses the spiritual emotions in the context of Dietrich's personalism, showing how the heart—the center of affective life—is the most revelatory, truest part of the human person. To purchase a copy of The Heart, click here: amzn.to/2u6k89n (available in Paperback or Kindle) To learn more about Dietrich von Hildebrand's philosophy of affectivity, including corresponding lectures on Max Scheler, John Henry Newman, and Thomas Aquinas, watch the videos from our 2020 Summer Seminar: https://hildebrandproject.org/the-heart-summer-seminar/ Become a monthly donor! Visit hildebrandproject.org/giving Follow us on Social Media Instagram: instagram.com/hildebrand_project YouTube: youtube.com/@TheHildebrandLegacy Twitter: twitter.com/HildebrandPrj Facebook: facebook.com/Hildebrandproject #Affectivity #AffectiveTheory #Phenomenology #Personalism #Philosophy

This episode of the Moral Imagination Podcast is a talk I gave at AmPhil's Center for Civil Society conference in November, 2023 on the “Rise of the Nones.”   According to Pew Research, those who declare no religious affiliation - None -  are now the largest religious category in the United States. In this talk I address several overarching reasons for the decline of Christianity and address how five dominant visions of the human person including person as a cog or scourge, transhumanism & transgenderism, plastic anthropology, and the person as a commodity — also play a key role not only in despair and anxiety, but contribute both to the decline of Christian belief and the rise of secularism and pantheism/new paganism. This talk is a thematic overview and distillation of two longer lectures I give on five false anthropologies and 10 reasons for unbelief and the decline of Christianity. Some of the topics I address include Breakdown of the Family - specifically decrease in fatherhood participation, and its impact on religious practice Sexual Revolution  - disorients the person and relationships between men and women Feminism & Smashing the Patriarchy — “Flight from Woman” Egalitarianism and Pantheism - Tocqueville's prediction of the rise of pantheism in democratic societies Technology + Technological Society: Practical: use of technology and propaganda Theoretical: Empiricist rationality is incoherent and severs relationship between affectivity and reason Scientism: vision of a technical solution to evil, sin, suffering Humanitarianism and what I call “Almost Christianity” Failures of the Church: scandal, corruption, assimilation, and failure to teach and catechize Loss of non-linguistic catechesis When people are leaving Christianity today, do they know what they are leaving?  Confusion about the nature and destiny of the human person and what it means to be an embodied person   Plastic Anthropology —malleable based on feelings Transhumanism / Transgenderism - combination of biology and technology Person as Cog Person as Scourge Person as Commodity — Everything becomes an object of trade. Del Noce's concept of Pure Bourgeois Conclude with several suggestions to address the loss of faith and confusions over anthropology Re-affirm that Being is good and intelligible - Our bodies are good Each person is a subject and not simply an object Defend Reason and Freedom We are embodied and Embedded Persons— our bodies are not accidental Thinkers I address include Augusto Del Noce, Joseph Ratzinger, C.S. Lewis, Henri DeLubac, Carrie Gress, Karl Stern, Christopher Palmer, Jaron Lanier, Max Scheler, Joseph Pieper, John Paul II See www.themoralimagination.com for book links and related podcasts.   AmPhil Center For Civil Society - Nonprofit Educational Leader Leading educational provider for nonprofit fundraising learning the Center for Civil Society is the go to for major gifts, campaigns, strategy, and... Time to read 8 minutes Dec 22nd, 2022   AmPhil Rise Of The Nones Nonprofit Conference Nov 7-8 Scottsdale. AZ Leading scholars, philanthropists, and nonprofit leaders will discuss the rise in secularism, decline in church attendance, and other related trends, and... (352 kB) https://amphil.com/event/c4cs-riseofnones/     Pew Research Center's Religion & Public Life Project Religious ‘Nones' in America: Who They Are and What They Believe 28% of U.S. adults are religiously unaffiliated, describing themselves as atheists, agnostics or “nothing in particular” when asked about their religion. Written by Gregory A. Smith, Patricia Tevington, Justin Nortey, Michael Rotolo, Asta Kallo and Becka A. Alper

Czym właściwie są wartości? Skąd wiemy, że coś jest wartościowe, i co to w ogóle znaczy? Co na ten temat mówili wybitni polski filozof Roman Ingarden oraz niemiecki filozof Max Scheler? O tym rozmawiam dzisiaj z dr Pauliną Seidler – filozofką i wykładowczynią Państwowej Akademii Nauk oraz Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, członkinią Polskiego Towarzystwa Logiki i Filozofii Nauki, oraz autorką książek popularno-filozoficznych pt. „O tym, co w życiu ważne – filozofia praktyczna” oraz „Po prostu spokój – jak żyć po stoicku”. Jej główne pola zainteresowań to popularyzacja filozofii i aplikacja jej do życia codziennego, stoicyzm, filozofia nauki, filozofia przyrody, ontologia, i literatura piękna. Paulina prowadzi także zajęcia na Uniwersytecie Otwartym UW – idea Uniwersytetu Otwartego polega na tym, że każdy – niezależnie od tego co robił i robi w życiu, może się zapisać na profesjonalne wykłady z interesującej go tematyki. U Pauliny można uczyć się m.in. o poglądach na dobre życie w historii filozofii, o emocjach w stoicyzmie, o myśli Marka Aureliusza, o filozoficznym self-care czy o filozofii nauki. KURSY PAULINY NA UNIWERSYTECIE OTWARTYM UW: https://www.uo.uw.edu.pl/biogram/1991 KSIĄŻKI PAULINY: „O tym, co w życiu ważne – filozofia praktyczna” – Paulina Seidler https://sklep.zwierciadlo.pl/produkt/ksiazki/psychologia-i-rozwoj-osobisty/rozwoj-osobisty/o-tym-co-w-zyciu-wazne „Po prostu spokój – jak dobrze żyć po stoicku" Paulina Seidler https://sklep.zwierciadlo.pl/produkt/ksiazki/psychologia-i-rozwoj-osobisty/psychologia-psychologia-i-rozwoj-osobisty/po-prostu-spokoj Podcast powstaje dzięki niesamowitym Patronom i Patronkom – dziękuję! Jeżeli ty też lubisz to, co robię, możesz wesprzeć Filozofię Po Prostu na Patronite – To niezwykle pomocne i motywujące :) Patronite: https://patronite.pl/filozofiapoprostu/description Zapraszam też na sociale: Instagram: @filozofia_po_prostu https://www.instagram.com/filozofia_po_prostu/?hl=en Facebook: Filozofia Po Prostu https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100068611986622 Kontakt e-mail: filozofia.po.prostu.podcast@gmail.com

Eine Frage ist leicht gestellt und oftmals reicht dafür ein Fragezeichen aus, doch was bedeutet eigentlich das Fragen? Für Erwin Straus ist der Mensch das fragende Wesen und Max Scheler sieht hierin den Unterschied zum Tier. Was es bedeutet zu fragen, ist der Gegenstand des Gesprächs zwischen Hannes Wendler und Alexander Wendt.Die 117. Folge des Podcasts Fipsi, in dem Alexander Wendt und Hannes Wendler den Dialog zwischen Philosophie und Psychologie entwickeln.Auf YouTube finden Sie alle Episoden von Fipsi unter https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLpIT6jK3mKTiQcXbinapKRbf39mLEpKWmAuf Spotify finden Sie Fipsi unter https://open.spotify.com/show/0il832RRDoPZPaNlC7vams?si=5KbdEcF1TImSHexKYGccfw&dl_branch=1Die Website der Arbeitsgemeinschaft: https://www.phi-psy.deMelden Sie sich mit Rückmeldungen und Anmerkungen gerne unter fipsi@phi-psy.deDiskutieren Sie mit uns auf Telegram: https://t.me/FipsiPPP oder https://t.me/PhiundPsyFür das Intro bedanken wir uns bei Estella und Peter: https://www.instagram.com/elpetera

Die 115. Episode von Fipsi bietet einem Gespräch zwischen drei Kennern und Bewunderern des Philosophen Max Scheler Raum. Im Kern des Austauschs zwischen Hannes Wendler und Alexander Wendt mit ihrem Gast Bernhard Geißler steht die Frage, was Scheler der Psychotherapie und Psychopathologie zu sagen hat.Die 115. Folge des Podcasts Fipsi, in dem Alexander Wendt und Hannes Wendler den Dialog zwischen Philosophie und Psychologie entwickeln.Auf YouTube finden Sie alle Episoden von Fipsi unter https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLpIT6jK3mKTiQcXbinapKRbf39mLEpKWmAuf Spotify finden Sie Fipsi unter https://open.spotify.com/show/0il832RRDoPZPaNlC7vams?si=5KbdEcF1TImSHexKYGccfw&dl_branch=1Die Website der Arbeitsgemeinschaft: https://www.phi-psy.deMelden Sie sich mit Rückmeldungen und Anmerkungen gerne unter fipsi@phi-psy.deDiskutieren Sie mit uns auf Telegram: https://t.me/FipsiPPP oder https://t.me/PhiundPsyFür das Intro bedanken wir uns bei Estella und Peter: https://www.instagram.com/elpetera

Don Antonio propone la sustitución del término bien común por el término bien social. El exministro de transportes, Enrique Barón, afirmaba que él era un bien de Estado. Referencias filosóficas a Aristóteles, Santo Tomás de Aquino y Max Scheler. Antonio García-Trevijano Forte y Dalmacio Negro Pavón, 3 de marzo del 2016. https://www.ivoox.com/rlc-2016-03-02-pedro-sanchez-aquino-sostiene-contra-audios-mp3_rf_10643253_1.html Música: Andante sinfonía nº94 de Haydn. ---------------------------- Escucha la lista de reproducción de los florilegios de Trevijano: https://go.ivoox.com/bk/9608366 ---------------------------- ----------- ¡APÓYANOS! - Vía iVoox: haz clic en APOYAR (botón de color azul). - Vía Paypal: https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=Y4WYL3BBYVVY4 - Vía Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/MCRC_es ------------ mcrc.es diariorc.com yonovoto.info

Un día como hoy, 19 de mayo: Acontece: 1909: en el Théâtre du Châtelet, en París (Francia) se estrena una gira dirigida por Serguéi Diáguilev, con 55 bailarines, entre ellos Vaslav Nijinsky. Es la primera vez que el ballet ruso es llevado al mundo occidental. Nace: 1762: Johann Gottlieb Fichte, filósofo alemán (f. 1814). 1932: Elena Poniatowska, escritora, activista y periodista mexicana. 1947: David Helfgott, pianista australiano. Fallece: 1864: Nathaniel Hawthorne, escritor estadounidense (n. 1804). 1928: Max Scheler, filósofo alemán (n. 1874). Conducido por Joel Almaguer. Una producción de Sala Prisma Podcast. 2023

Die 108. Folge des Podcasts Fipsi, der als erster seiner Art den Dialog zwischen Philosophie und Psychologie anstrebt. In dieser Episode diskutieren Hannes Wendler und Alexander Wendt über die Frage, warum - wenn überhaupt - man studieren sollte. In diesem Zusammenhang kommen sie unter anderem auf Friedrich Schleiermacher, Max Scheler und Thiemo Breyer zu sprechen. Auf YouTube finden Sie alle Episoden von Fipsi unter https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLpIT6jK3mKTiQcXbinapKRbf39mLEpKWm Auf Spotify finden Sie Fipsi unter https://open.spotify.com/show/0il832RRDoPZPaNlC7vams?si=5KbdEcF1TImSHexKYGccfw&dl_branch=1 Die Website der Arbeitsgemeinschaft: https://www.phi-psy.de Melden Sie sich mit Rückmeldungen und Anmerkungen gerne unter fipsi@phi-psy.de Diskutieren Sie mit uns auf Telegram: https://t.me/FipsiPPP oder https://t.me/PhiundPsy Für das Intro bedanken wir uns bei Estella und Peter: https://www.instagram.com/elpetera 

Gemeinsam mit dem Philosophen, Mathematiker und Unternehmer Jobst Landgrebe tritt Matussek heute den Transhumanismus in die Mülltonne und vernichtet dessen Posterboy Yuval Harari, der von der Vergottung des Menschen (im Buch „Homo Deus“) träumt. Die beiden räumen auf mit dem Hype um die Künstliche Intelligenz (KI), die soeben mit dem Programm Chat GPT Schlagzeilen macht. Sie entdecken in der KI eine dürftige Ersatzreligion, und rufen Sachverständige wie Papst Benedikt und Max Scheler in den Zeugenstand. Die Musik liefern Maschinen.

In this episode I speak with Jonathan Bi about the ideas of Rene Girard, social pressure, authentic and false desires, victims and scapegoats, persecution, and Girardian theories on imitation and violence. We also discuss how Girard's work sheds light on woke capitalism, right and left totalitarianism, Max Scheler, Hannah Arendt, Alexis de Tocqueville, and more. We discuss many themes including: Christianity and Girard's theory and the secularization and falsification of Christian values such as how humanitarianism and pacificism replace charity and peace and justice and more. Evangelical Counsels and The Rule of St. Benedict as a response to metaphysical desire Different views of the problem of evil: Hegel, Rousseau, Ratzinger, Solzhenitsyn, Girard Human Perfectibility and Utopianism Hope and Progress Benedict XVI Spe Salvi On the goodness of being in the Hebrew Bible, New Testament, and St. Augustine. There is no technical solution to the problems of evil, suffering, of death Embedded complexity, the dignity of labor, linear time, and how we live in a Christian civilization Girard's explanation of how scapegoating others for their behavior reveals that we too would be guilty — and why it is folly to think with confidence that we would not go along with the crowd if we lived under the Nazis or a slaveholding society We begin a discussion on the atonement, Girard's views and how to think about sacrifice — that we'll have to finish in more detail We also have a discussion about Christianity and Buddhism and religious belief. I hope you enjoy. Biography Jonathan Bi is an entrepreneur working on a startup in FinTech and a philosopher focusing on Buddhist philosophy, Continental philosophy, and specifically the work of Rene Girard. Among his many projects he and David Perell have created a seven session video course on the ideas of Rene Girard. Originally from China, Jonathan also grew up in Canada, and studied computer science at Columbia.   https://johnathanbi.com/   Resources Jonathan Bi and David Perell Lectures on Girard On the Atonement — we just got into this briefly, but didn't have enough time or preparation to address it sufficiently. I am going to have another episode on the atonement, and also on Girard and the atonement, but here are two links to Catholic resources view of the atonement  New Advent Catholic Catechism    

Vortrag von Prof. Hanna-Barbara Gerl-Falkovitz im Festsaal im Erzbischöflichen Palais am 29.10.2022. Ein Vortrag der Tagung "Ich will Dich sehen, wie Du bist".Eine Veranstaltung von:Edith Stein Gesellschaft Österreich http://www.edith-stein-gesellschaft.atKarmeliten in Österreich http://www.karmel.atWenn Sie die Edith Stein Gesellschaft und ihre Arbeit finanziell unterstützen möchten, können Sie Ihre Spende auf untenstehendes Konto überweisen.Die Edith Stein Gesellschaft Österreich bedankt sich herzlich für Ihre Spende.Bitte verwenden Sie als Verwendungszweck: Tagung2022YTEdith Stein Gesellschaft ÖsterreichIBAN: AT11 3200 0000 1166 8209BIC: RLNWATWWKreditinstitut: RLB NOE-WIEN AG, 1190 Wien, Saarplatz 11-13.Sie können aber auch per PayPal spenden:https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=AGF45AP78PEPCSupport the show

Die 84. Folge des Podcasts Fipsi, der als erster seiner Art den Dialog zwischen Philosophie und Psychologie anstrebt. In dieser Episode diskutieren Hannes Wendler und Alexander Wendt über den Bildungsbegriff. In diesem Zusammenhang kommen sie unter anderem auf Max Scheler und Guido Cusinato zu sprechen.Auf YouTube finden Sie alle Episoden von Fipsi unter https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLpIT6jK3mKTiQcXbinapKRbf39mLEpKWmAuf Spotify finden Sie Fipsi unter https://open.spotify.com/show/0il832RRDoPZPaNlC7vams?si=5KbdEcF1TImSHexKYGccfw&dl_branch=1Die Website der Arbeitsgemeinschaft: https://www.phi-psy.deMelden Sie sich mit Rückmeldungen und Anmerkungen gerne unter fipsi@phi-psy.deDiskutieren Sie mit uns auf Telegram: https://t.me/FipsiPPP oder https://t.me/PhiundPsyFür das Intro bedanken wir uns bei Estella und Peter: https://www.instagram.com/elpetera

ST. EDITH STEIN l PATRON OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH AND ONE OF SIX PATRON SAINTS OF EUROPE Feast Day: October 11 To be a Jew is to belong to the Chosen People, to the race of Abraham and finally of Jesus Christ. But the Jews did not recognize Jesus and until now they are still waiting for the Messiah. Our saint for today is Edith Stein, now St. Teresa Benedicta of the Cross, a Jew who was converted to Catholicism, became a Carmelite and was martyred during the German persecution. Edith Stein was born in Breslau, Germany (now Wroclaw, Poland) on October 12, 1891. The youngest of eleven children, her mother loved her more than her siblings for she was born on the day the Jews were celebrating “Yom Kippur”, the Jewish Day of Atonement. When she was two years old, her father died and her mother took upon herself the family business and the duty of raising her children. Consequently she neglected the spiritual life of her children and Edith lost her faith in God. In 1911 she enrolled in a university to study German and history, but her real interest was philosophy. She transferred to another university and met philosopher Edmund Husserl, who initiated her knowledge about Christianity. She became Husserl's teaching assistant and through tutorage received in 1917 her doctorate “summa cum laude. Later, he met Max Scheler, who instructed her about Catholicism. At the beginning of World War I she took up nursing and served in an Austrian field hospital. Meanwhile, her attraction to Catholicism became strong. She read the New Testament, the Spiritual Exercises of St. Ignatius of Loyola, St. Thomas Aquinas and Kierkegaard. When she read the life of St. Teresa of Avila she was finally convinced that Catholicism has the Truth. And she decided to follow her footsteps. Edith was baptized as a Catholic on January 1st, 1922. On the feast of the Purification, she was confirmed. After the ceremony, she went to her mother: “Mother, I am a Catholic.” They embraced and wept. Edith wanted immediately to enter Carmel, but her spiritual director told her to wait. She took a teaching job and translated the diaries of Cardinal Newman and St. Thomas Aquinas. In 1933 the persecution of the Jews began. Edith lost her teaching job. Her mother cried: “Why did you become acquainted with Christianity? I don't say anything against him (Jesus Christ). He may have been a good man, but why did he make himself a God?” Edith's mother remained in her Jewish faith until death. On October 14, 1933, Edith entered Carmel. The following year, she made her temporary vows. She made her perpetual vows on April 21, 1938. Meanwhile the Jewish persecution by the Germans increased. Synagogues were burned, properties were confiscated and people were arrested and killed. Edith's superior wanted to send her to a far convent but Edith refused: “If I cannot share the lot of my brothers and sisters, my life in a certain sense is destroyed. Edith was arrested by the Gestapo, together with her blood sister Rosa who was working in the convent, on August 2, 1942. They were brought to a temporary camp, then on August 7 to Auschwitz. Two days later, they were killed in the gas chamber. After World War II, a gat clamor for her recognition as a martyr of the faith arose. Miracles also confirmed the people's wish. In 1987, she was beatified by Pope John Paul II and proclaimed martyr and a saint on October 11, 1988. Can I stand for the truth in the face of conflict and oppressive treatment?

Acompaña a Ricardo Cartas en una emisión más de la revista cultural De eso se trata, espacio de ciencia, de cultura, de gastronomía, de libros y más, de lunes a viernes de 08:30 a 10:00 horas. En El territorio del nómada, el Mtro. Juan Carlos Canales, profesor e investigador de la Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, reflexiona sobre la película: Atenea de Romain Gavras del año 2022, cuya historia narra la trágica muerte del menor de tres hermanos musulmanes, conflicto que sume a París en el caos. En esta cinta se plantea el reto de cómo gobernar en un mundo fragmentado. Se recomienda leer el libro: El resentimiento en la moral de Max Scheler.

Die 79. Folge des Podcasts Fipsi, der als erster seiner Art den Dialog zwischen Philosophie und Psychologie anstrebt. Im Gespräch mit ihrem Gast Sebastian Luft setzen sich Hannes Wendler und Alexander Wendt mit der Frage auseinander, ob Phänomenologie und Pragmatismus in einem fruchtbaren Verhältnis zueinander stehen. Dabei kommen sie auf Adolf Reinach und Max Scheler zu sprechen.Die Kontaktadresse von Prof. Dr. Luft für eventuelle Kommentare und Rückfragen: sebastian.luft@marquette.eduAuf YouTube finden Sie alle Episoden von Fipsi unter https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLpIT6jK3mKTiQcXbinapKRbf39mLEpKWmAuf Spotify finden Sie Fipsi unter https://open.spotify.com/show/0il832RRDoPZPaNlC7vams?si=5KbdEcF1TImSHexKYGccfw&dl_branch=1Die Website der Arbeitsgemeinschaft: https://www.phi-psy.deMelden Sie sich mit Rückmeldungen und Anmerkungen gerne unter fipsi@phi-psy.deDiskutieren Sie mit uns auf Telegram: https://t.me/FipsiPPP oder https://t.me/PhiundPsyFür das Intro bedanken wir uns bei Estella und Peter: https://www.instagram.com/elpetera

Die 70. Folge des Podcasts Fipsi, der als erster seiner Art den Dialog zwischen Philosophie und Psychologie anstrebt. In dieser Episode diskutieren Hannes Wendler und Alexander Wendt über ihrem Gast Eugene Kelly über die Bedeutung von Max Schelers Werk. In diesem Zusammenhang legen sie eine besonderen Fokus auf den transatlantischen Dialog in der Schelerforschung.Auf YouTube finden Sie alle Episoden von Fipsi unter https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLpIT6jK3mKTiQcXbinapKRbf39mLEpKWmAuf Spotify finden Sie Fipsi unter https://open.spotify.com/show/0il832RRDoPZPaNlC7vams?si=5KbdEcF1TImSHexKYGccfw&dl_branch=1Die Website der Arbeitsgemeinschaft: https://www.phi-psy.deMelden Sie sich mit Rückmeldungen und Anmerkungen gerne unter fipsi@phi-psy.deDiskutieren Sie mit uns auf Telegram: https://t.me/FipsiPPP oder https://t.me/PhiundPsyFür das Intro bedanken wir uns bei Estella und Peter: https://www.instagram.com/elpetera

Within the Western tradition, it was the philosophers Henri Bergson and Max Scheler who laid out and explored the nonrational power of "intuition" at work in human beings that plays a key role in orienting their thinking and action within the world. As author Adriana Alfaro Altamirano notes, Bergon's and Scheler's philosophical explorations, which paralleled similar developments by other modernist writers, artists, and political actors of the early twentieth century, can yield fruitful insights into the ideas and passions that animate politics in our own time. The Belief in Intuition: Individuality and Authority in Henri Bergson and Max Scheler (U Pennsylvania Press, 2021) shows that intuition (as Bergson and Scheler understood it) leads, first and foremost, to a conception of freedom that is especially suited for dealing with hierarchy, uncertainty, and alterity. Such a conception of freedom is grounded in a sense of individuality that remains true to its "inner multiplicity," thus providing a distinct contrast to and critique of the liberal notion of the self. Focusing on the complex inner lives that drive human action, as Bergson and Scheler did, leads us to appreciate the moral and empirical limits of liberal devices that mean to regulate our actions "from the outside." Such devices, like the law, may not only carry pernicious effects for freedom but, more troublingly, oftentimes "erase their traces," concealing the very ways in which they are detrimental to a richer experience of subjectivity. According to Alfaro Altamirano, Bergson's and Scheler's conception of intuition and personal authority puts contemporary discussions about populism in a different light: It shows that liberalism would only at its own peril deny the anthropological, moral, and political importance of the bearers of charismatic authority. Personal authority thus understood relies on a dense, but elusive, notion of personality, for which personal authority is not only consistent with freedom, but even contributes to it in decisive ways. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

Within the Western tradition, it was the philosophers Henri Bergson and Max Scheler who laid out and explored the nonrational power of "intuition" at work in human beings that plays a key role in orienting their thinking and action within the world. As author Adriana Alfaro Altamirano notes, Bergon's and Scheler's philosophical explorations, which paralleled similar developments by other modernist writers, artists, and political actors of the early twentieth century, can yield fruitful insights into the ideas and passions that animate politics in our own time. The Belief in Intuition: Individuality and Authority in Henri Bergson and Max Scheler (U Pennsylvania Press, 2021) shows that intuition (as Bergson and Scheler understood it) leads, first and foremost, to a conception of freedom that is especially suited for dealing with hierarchy, uncertainty, and alterity. Such a conception of freedom is grounded in a sense of individuality that remains true to its "inner multiplicity," thus providing a distinct contrast to and critique of the liberal notion of the self. Focusing on the complex inner lives that drive human action, as Bergson and Scheler did, leads us to appreciate the moral and empirical limits of liberal devices that mean to regulate our actions "from the outside." Such devices, like the law, may not only carry pernicious effects for freedom but, more troublingly, oftentimes "erase their traces," concealing the very ways in which they are detrimental to a richer experience of subjectivity. According to Alfaro Altamirano, Bergson's and Scheler's conception of intuition and personal authority puts contemporary discussions about populism in a different light: It shows that liberalism would only at its own peril deny the anthropological, moral, and political importance of the bearers of charismatic authority. Personal authority thus understood relies on a dense, but elusive, notion of personality, for which personal authority is not only consistent with freedom, but even contributes to it in decisive ways. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/german-studies

Within the Western tradition, it was the philosophers Henri Bergson and Max Scheler who laid out and explored the nonrational power of "intuition" at work in human beings that plays a key role in orienting their thinking and action within the world. As author Adriana Alfaro Altamirano notes, Bergon's and Scheler's philosophical explorations, which paralleled similar developments by other modernist writers, artists, and political actors of the early twentieth century, can yield fruitful insights into the ideas and passions that animate politics in our own time. The Belief in Intuition: Individuality and Authority in Henri Bergson and Max Scheler (U Pennsylvania Press, 2021) shows that intuition (as Bergson and Scheler understood it) leads, first and foremost, to a conception of freedom that is especially suited for dealing with hierarchy, uncertainty, and alterity. Such a conception of freedom is grounded in a sense of individuality that remains true to its "inner multiplicity," thus providing a distinct contrast to and critique of the liberal notion of the self. Focusing on the complex inner lives that drive human action, as Bergson and Scheler did, leads us to appreciate the moral and empirical limits of liberal devices that mean to regulate our actions "from the outside." Such devices, like the law, may not only carry pernicious effects for freedom but, more troublingly, oftentimes "erase their traces," concealing the very ways in which they are detrimental to a richer experience of subjectivity. According to Alfaro Altamirano, Bergson's and Scheler's conception of intuition and personal authority puts contemporary discussions about populism in a different light: It shows that liberalism would only at its own peril deny the anthropological, moral, and political importance of the bearers of charismatic authority. Personal authority thus understood relies on a dense, but elusive, notion of personality, for which personal authority is not only consistent with freedom, but even contributes to it in decisive ways. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/intellectual-history

Within the Western tradition, it was the philosophers Henri Bergson and Max Scheler who laid out and explored the nonrational power of "intuition" at work in human beings that plays a key role in orienting their thinking and action within the world. As author Adriana Alfaro Altamirano notes, Bergon's and Scheler's philosophical explorations, which paralleled similar developments by other modernist writers, artists, and political actors of the early twentieth century, can yield fruitful insights into the ideas and passions that animate politics in our own time. The Belief in Intuition: Individuality and Authority in Henri Bergson and Max Scheler (U Pennsylvania Press, 2021) shows that intuition (as Bergson and Scheler understood it) leads, first and foremost, to a conception of freedom that is especially suited for dealing with hierarchy, uncertainty, and alterity. Such a conception of freedom is grounded in a sense of individuality that remains true to its "inner multiplicity," thus providing a distinct contrast to and critique of the liberal notion of the self. Focusing on the complex inner lives that drive human action, as Bergson and Scheler did, leads us to appreciate the moral and empirical limits of liberal devices that mean to regulate our actions "from the outside." Such devices, like the law, may not only carry pernicious effects for freedom but, more troublingly, oftentimes "erase their traces," concealing the very ways in which they are detrimental to a richer experience of subjectivity. According to Alfaro Altamirano, Bergson's and Scheler's conception of intuition and personal authority puts contemporary discussions about populism in a different light: It shows that liberalism would only at its own peril deny the anthropological, moral, and political importance of the bearers of charismatic authority. Personal authority thus understood relies on a dense, but elusive, notion of personality, for which personal authority is not only consistent with freedom, but even contributes to it in decisive ways. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/european-studies

Within the Western tradition, it was the philosophers Henri Bergson and Max Scheler who laid out and explored the nonrational power of "intuition" at work in human beings that plays a key role in orienting their thinking and action within the world. As author Adriana Alfaro Altamirano notes, Bergon's and Scheler's philosophical explorations, which paralleled similar developments by other modernist writers, artists, and political actors of the early twentieth century, can yield fruitful insights into the ideas and passions that animate politics in our own time. The Belief in Intuition: Individuality and Authority in Henri Bergson and Max Scheler (U Pennsylvania Press, 2021) shows that intuition (as Bergson and Scheler understood it) leads, first and foremost, to a conception of freedom that is especially suited for dealing with hierarchy, uncertainty, and alterity. Such a conception of freedom is grounded in a sense of individuality that remains true to its "inner multiplicity," thus providing a distinct contrast to and critique of the liberal notion of the self. Focusing on the complex inner lives that drive human action, as Bergson and Scheler did, leads us to appreciate the moral and empirical limits of liberal devices that mean to regulate our actions "from the outside." Such devices, like the law, may not only carry pernicious effects for freedom but, more troublingly, oftentimes "erase their traces," concealing the very ways in which they are detrimental to a richer experience of subjectivity. According to Alfaro Altamirano, Bergson's and Scheler's conception of intuition and personal authority puts contemporary discussions about populism in a different light: It shows that liberalism would only at its own peril deny the anthropological, moral, and political importance of the bearers of charismatic authority. Personal authority thus understood relies on a dense, but elusive, notion of personality, for which personal authority is not only consistent with freedom, but even contributes to it in decisive ways. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/french-studies

What does Max Scheler have to do with me?

Publicado el 20 sept 2019 Alicja Gescinska es una reconocida filósofa y escritora polaco-belga. Nacida en Varsovia en 1981, a los siete años migró con su familia a Bélgica escapando del comunismo. En 2012 obtuvo su doctorado en ciencias morales por la Universidad de Ghent presentando la tesis "Una investigación filosófica sobre el significado de agencia humana en el pensamiento de Max Scheler y Karol Wojtyla". En 2013-2014 realiza un postdoctorado en la Universidad de Princeton y en 2014-2016 trabaja como Profesora Asistente en Amherst College dictando cursos sobre filosofía y política europea. Alicja ha escrito varios libros de ficción y no ficción que han sido muy bien recibidos por la crítica. Destacan "La conquista de la libertad" y "Un tipo de amor" así como diversos ensayos y trabajos académicos. En 2016 y 2017 condujo el programa Wanderlust para el canal belga Canvas teniendo como entrevistados a grandes personajes de la filosofía y la cultura como Raymond Tallis, Theodore Darlymple, Sara Maitland, Youssou N'Dour y Roger Scruton. Actualmente se desempeña como profesora de filosofía en las universidades de Ghent y Buckingham (Reino Unido). Alicja Gescinska en redes sociales / Alicja Gescinska in Social Media Página web personal / Personal website https://gescinska.com/en/ Twitter https://twitter.com/Gescinska Instagram https://www.instagram.com/gescinska/ Sígueme en / Follow me on Twitter https://twitter.com/mlukacs Facebook https://www.facebook.com/miklos.lukacs.8 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/m_lukacs/ Música/Music Epidemic Sound and Soundstripe - Active Licenses

The very coincidental moment war breaks out in Ukraine, unleashing tidal waves of propaganda and fake sentiment across the globe, Aimee Terese jumps on the wire for a deep discussion on the hatred at the heart of so much "humanitarianism," inspired by Max Scheler's important book "Ressentiment" (1912). This is the first hour preview. For the full 4 hours, subscribe to our Patreon at patreon.com/filthyarmenian   Follow Aimee Terese on Twitter @aimeeterese and subscribe to her excellent podcast What's Left co-hosted by Oliver Bateman.   Follow us on Twitter and Instagram @filthyarmenian

Die 17. Folge des Podcasts Fipsi, der als erster seiner Art den Dialog zwischen Philosophie und Psychologie anstrebt. In dieser Episode diskutieren Hannes Wendler und Alexander Wendt das Problem der Fremderfahrung und berücksichtigen dabei insbesondere die Empathie. In diesem Zusammenhang kommen sie unter anderem auf Theodor Lipps und Max Scheler zu sprechen.In der Episode wird auf das goldene Rechteck (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldenes_Rechteck) und auf das Symbol "|_" verwiesen.Auf YouTube finden Sie alle Episoden von Fipsi unter https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLpIT6jK3mKTiQcXbinapKRbf39mLEpKWmAuf Spotify finden Sie Fipsi unter https://open.spotify.com/show/0il832RRDoPZPaNlC7vams?si=kxx8G-Q8TpC2rxNUJmpckQDie Website der Arbeitsgemeinschaft: https://www.phi-psy.de Melden Sie sich mit Rückmeldungen und Anmerkungen gerne unter fipsi@phi-psy.deDiskutieren Sie mit uns auf Telegram: https://t.me/FipsiPPP oder https://t.me/PhiundPsy Für das Intro bedanken wir uns bei Estella und Peter: https://www.instagram.com/elpetera

Die 15. Folge des Podcasts Fipsi, der als erster seiner Art den Dialog zwischen Philosophie und Psychologie anstrebt. Diese Episode schließt unmittelbar an die vorhergehende 14. Episode an, indem sie erneut die Frage nach dem Menschen stellt. Genauer gesagt diskutieren Hannes Wendler und Alexander Wendt darüber, ob es so etwas wie ein Paradigma der Philosophischen Anthropologie gibt und was darunter zu verstehen ist. Dabei kommen sie unter anderem auf Matthias Wunsch, Joachim Fischer, Max Scheler, Helmuth Plessner und Arnold Gehlen zu sprechen.Auf YouTube finden Sie alle Episoden von Fipsi unter https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLpIT6jK3mKTiQcXbinapKRbf39mLEpKWmAuf Spotify finden Sie Fipsi unter https://open.spotify.com/show/0il832RRDoPZPaNlC7vams?si=kxx8G-Q8TpC2rxNUJmpckQDie Website der Arbeitsgemeinschaft: https://www.phi-psy.de     Melden Sie sich mit Rückmeldungen und Anmerkungen gerne unter fipsi@phi-psy.deDiskutieren Sie mit uns auf Telegram: https://t.me/FipsiPPP   oder https://t.me/PhiundPsy   Für das Intro bedanken wir uns bei Estella und Peter: https://www.instagram.com/elpetera

Die 14. Folge des Podcasts Fipsi, der als erster seiner Art den Dialog zwischen Philosophie und Psychologie anstrebt. In dieser Episode diskutieren Hannes Wendler und Alexander Wendt das anthropologische Verhältnis zwischen Mensch und Tier. Dabei kommen sie auf Max Scheler und Giorgio Agamben zu sprechen.Auf Youtube finden Sie Fipsi unter https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLpIT6jK3mKTiQcXbinapKRbf39mLEpKWmDie Website der Arbeitsgemeinschaft: https://www.phi-psy.de​​​​​​​​Melden Sie sich mit Rückmeldungen und Anmerkungen gerne unter fipsi@phi-psy.deDiskutieren Sie mit uns auf Telegram: https://t.me/FipsiPPP​​​​ oder https://t.me/PhiundPsy​​​​Für das Intro bedanken wir uns bei Estella und Peter: https://www.instagram.com/elpetera​

Un día como hoy, 19 de mayo: Acontece: 1909: en el Théâtre du Châtelet, en París (Francia) se estrena una gira dirigida por Serguéi Diáguilev, con 55 bailarines, entre ellos Vaslav Nijinsky. Es la primera vez que el ballet ruso es llevado al mundo occidental. Nace: 1762: Johann Gottlieb Fichte, filósofo alemán (f. 1814). 1932: Elena Poniatowska, escritora, activista y periodista mexicana. 1947: David Helfgott, pianista australiano. Fallece: 1864: Nathaniel Hawthorne, escritor estadounidense (n. 1804). 1928: Max Scheler, filósofo alemán (n. 1874). Una producción de Sala Prisma Podcast. 2021

Season five of our podcast continues with another presentation from our 2020 annual conference: ‘Engaged Phenomenology’ Online. This episode features Lewis Coyne, University of Exeter.   ABSTRACT: In recent years the phenomenological approach to bioethics has been rejuvenated and reformulated by, amongst others, the Swedish philosopher Fredrik Svenaeus. Building on the now-relatively mainstream phenomenological approach to health and illness, Svenaeus has sought to bring phenomenological insights to bear on the bioethical enterprise, with a view to critiquing and refining the ‘philosophical anthropology’ presupposed by the latter. In this talk I will offer a critical but sympathetic analysis of Svenaeus’ efforts, focusing on both his conception of the aims of phenomenological bioethics and the broadly Heideggerian methods he employs. Doing so reveals certain problems with both. I argue that the main aim of phenomenological bioethics as set out by Svenaeus needs to be reformulated, and that there are important oversights in his Heideggerian approach to reaching this end. I will conclude by arguing that to overcome the latter problem we should draw on the works of Max Scheler and Hans Jonas in future research.   BIO: I am an associate lecturer and honorary research fellow in philosophy at the University of Exeter, working at the intersection of existential phenomenology, practical ethics, and philosophical anthropology. My overarching interests are in the phenomena of life and death, and the ethics of technologically appropriating (human and non-human) nature. My publications on these topics include being co-editor of Moral Enhancement: Critical Perspectives (Cambridge University Press, 2018), and author of Hans Jonas: Life, Technology and the Horizons of Responsibility (Bloomsbury, 2020).   This recording is taken from the BSP Annual Conference 2020 Online: 'Engaged Phenomenology'. Organised with the University of Exeter and sponsored by Egenis and the Wellcome Centre for Cultures and Environments of Health. BSP2020AC was held online this year due to global concerns about the Coronavirus pandemic. For the conference our speakers recorded videos, our keynotes presented live over Zoom, and we also recorded some interviews online as well. Podcast episodes from BSP2020AC are soundtracks of those videos where we and the presenters feel the audio works as a standalone: https://www.britishphenomenology.org.uk/bsp-annual-conference-2020/   You can check out our forthcoming events here: https://www.britishphenomenology.org.uk/events/   The British Society for Phenomenology is a not-for-profit organisation set up with the intention of promoting research and awareness in the field of Phenomenology and other cognate arms of philosophical thought. Currently, the society accomplishes these aims through its journal, events, and podcast. Why not find out more, join the society, and subscribe to our journal the JBSP? https://www.britishphenomenology.org.uk/

Hoy, en el vigésimo séptimo capítulo de «La cátedra de Dalmacio» (CátD), presentado y conducido por Enrique Baeza, Dalmacio Negro Pavón (catedrático de Ciencias Políticas y autor de numerosos artículos y libros) disertará sobre la relación del mal con el poder. Se utiliza como punto de partida una presentación del libro de Antonio Hidalgo Diego «El minotauro en Alcácer». Libros: - «Aforismos» Nicolás Gómez Dávila. - «Nietzsche, destructor o renovador del cristianismo» Eugen Biser. - «Erótica del poder» Jesús Fuello. - «Friedrich Nietzsche: antología» Hans Urs Von Balthasar. Referencias a: - Presentación del libro de Antonio Hidalgo Diego, «El minotauro en Alcácer»: https://youtu.be/p-ZG26Yqek0. - Marqués de Sade. - Friedrich Nietzsche. - Simone de Beauvoir. - Max Scheler. - Siméon Denis Poisson. - Jacobo Burhart. - Gregorio Marañón. - General Prim. mcrc.es diariorc.com yonovoto.info

در این قسمت به بررسی افکار و اندیشه های کارل مانهایم (1893-1947) در زمینه جامعه شناسی معرفت Sociology of Knowledge می پردازیم همچنین با مثال هایی از کارل مارکس Karl Marx ماکس شلر Max Scheler

In this episode, I speak with Luke Burgis about Rene Girard, the mimetic cycle, imitation, desire, and scapegoating, and how these things play out in business, commerce and everyday life. We discuss his forthcoming book, Wanting: The Power of Mimetic Desire in Everyday Life. Themes include how are desires our shaped by others, the leveling of desire through social media, the problem of scapegoating including not only scapegoating of the innocent, but how the the guilty be scapegoated to distract attention from other guilty parties. We also discuss positive and negative mimesis, and a number of writers and entrepreneurs including Max Scheler, Alexis De Tocqueville, Peter Thiel, Nassim Taleb, and why Rene Girard’s insights have much to say about commerce, our contemporary political economy, and our everyday life. We did this interview earlier this year while he was in the midst of writing, but the book is now finished and will be out in Spring of 2021. Visit https://www.themoralimagination.com/episodes/luke-burgis for show notes and resources.

Desmond Wong (a 34 year-old Singaporean) and I discuss the opportunities that Singapore presents to the world as an emerging Asian model for an economy of well-being. Having visited Singapore twice in 2018 I came to a deep appreciation of the the potential of this small Asian nation to become one of the most successful working models of an economy of well-being. We also cover the important influence of German philosopher Max Scheler (1874-1928) whose writings on ethics and values influenced the thinking of Pope John Paul II. on his own notion of a Civilization of Love. Who is Desmond Wong? He is a Singaporean Catholic who pursued his calling into the plural sector, from “grassroots and boots” to consulting for charities, government, and philanthropists. He has presented case studies on community operational research (OR) in China, Japan, Singapore, Thailand, and the United Kingdom. Desmond believes that purpose must inform our apparatus and actions, and that only people have phenomenal value, in every sense of the phrase. Rather than Pilatian listening to the crowds, we would do better by revisiting what is meaningful to us as living communities. Rather than ideology, we would do better in the light of both faith and reason, and the experience of love that takes us out of our comfort zone and sends us into the world. Desmond holds an Executive Masters of Business Administration, University of Hull, United Kingdom, a Bachelor and Master of Arts degrees in Psychology, Executive Education from Harvard University, United States, and is Full Member of the Singapore Psychological Society. “If we do not face our wounds, we will inflict wounds on others … We need to be found and carried … by someone who will leave the 99 … why? The shepherd says … ‘You may be a wounded sheep or a lost, useless coin, but … Here I AM … have no fear … your wounds, your sins can never diminish your worth for me'.” – Cardinal Luis Antonio Tagle --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/mark-anielski/message

En este episodio hablaremos de una de las principales influencias de Viktor Frankl, Max Scheler, como homenaje al filósofo de Munich en su aniversario 146 de su nacimiento.

Our podcast turns to a paper from Pablo Andreu, University of Zaragoza, Spain, and University College Dublin (UCD), Ireland.. The recording is taken from our 2019 Annual Conference, ‘The Theory and Practice of Phenomenology’.   ABSTRACT: The following paper aims to open the reader to a comprehension of death from a phenomenological and hermeneutical point of view. Set against the background work of Max Scheler and Martini Heidegger’s analysis of the phenomenon, we adopt Paul Louis Landsberg’s interpretation of death as an “ontological infidelity”. Such definition of death deals with a fundamental and original predisposition to believe, which we recognize as faith. This faith, which stand as a complete openness to the other, is an essential constituent of human existence, without which we cannot understand Heidegger’s Angst. As such, we postulate that this faith is ontologically prior to Heidegger’s anxiety. As Landsberg says, “the anguish of death, and not only the pain of dying, would be incomprehensible of the fundamental structure of our being did not include the existential postulate of something beyond” (Landsberg, 2009, p. 25). We defend that by the braking of the connections entangled through this essential openness, the person is striped from the meaning of her existence and therefore thrown to a state of dead. This implies that there is no possible understanding of the phenomenon of death without a comprehension of our relation with and to the other. As a result, first, we aim to give a specific reading on the phenomenon of death, that is not to be confused with our mortal condition – so in Scheler and Heidegger – and, second, shed some light unto the actual medical debate concerning the state of being of patients in situations that cannot be clearly determined neither as alive nor dead.   BIO: Pablo Ilian Toso Andreu is a PhD Student at the University of Zaragoza, Spain, currently staying at University College Dublin (UCD) in Ireland. Mainly focused on phenomenology, and specifically the phenomenology of death, Mr. Andreu has also approached analytic philosophy through the Master’s program offered by the University of Barcelona.   The ‘British Society for Phenomenology Annual Conference 2019 – the Theory and Practice of Phenomenology’ was held at the International Anthony Burgess Foundation, Manchester, UK, 5 – 7 September, 2019: https://www.britishphenomenology.org.uk/conference/   You can check out our forthcoming events here: https://www.britishphenomenology.org.uk/events/   The British Society for Phenomenology is a not-for-profit organisation set up with the intention of promoting research and awareness in the field of Phenomenology and other cognate arms of philosophical thought. Currently, the society accomplishes these aims through its journal, events, and podcast. Why not find out more, join the society, and subscribe to our journal the JBSP? https://www.britishphenomenology.org.uk/

En este episodio hablaremos de la revolución de 1923, la entrevista de ingreso a la Sociedad de Psicoanálisis, su encuentro con Freud y su acercamiento a las ideas de Max Scheler.

Season 18, Episode 1. Ngaji FIlsafat - Dr. Fahruddin Faiz Edmund Gustav Albrecht Husserl (lahir di Prostějov (Prossnitz), Moravia, Ceko, 8 April 1859 – meninggal di Freiburg, Jerman, 26 April 1938 pada umur 79 tahun) adalah seorang filsuf Jerman, yang dikenal sebagai bapak fenomenologi. Karyanya meninggalkan orientasi yang murni positivis dalam sains dan filsafat pada masanya, dan mengutamakan pengalaman subyektif sebagai sumber dari semua pengetahuan kita tentang fenomena obyektif. Husserl dilahirkan dalam sebuah keluarga Yahudi di Prostějov (Proßnitz), Moravia, Ceko (yang saat itu merupakan bagian dari Kekaisaran Austria). Husserl adalah murid Franz Brentano dan Carl Stumpf; karya filsafatnya memengaruhi, antara lain, Edith Stein (St. Teresa Benedicta dari Salib), Eugen Fink, Max Scheler, Martin Heidegger, Jean-Paul Sartre, Emmanuel Lévinas, Rudolf Carnap, Hermann Weyl, Maurice Merleau-Ponty, dan Roman Ingarden. Pada 1887 Husserl berpindah agama menjadi Kristen dan bergabung dengan Gereja Lutheran. Ia mengajar filsafat di Halle sebagai seorang tutor (Privatdozent) dari 1887, lalu di Göttingen sebagai profesor dari 1901, dan di Freiburg im Breisgau dari 1916 hingga ia pensiun pada 1928. Setelah itu, ia melanjutkan penelitiannya dan menulis dengan menggunakan perpustakaan di Freiburg, hingga kemudian dilarang menggunakannya - karena ia keturunan Yahudi - yang saat itu dipimpin oleh rektor, dan sebagian karena pengaruh dari bekas muridnya, yang juga anak emasnya, Martin Heidegger.

Reconquest Episode 232: What’s Wrong with Personalism? Episode 232 debuts on June 3, at 8:00 PM Eastern. Rebroadcasts will take place according to the Crusade Channel programming schedule (note: all times listed are Central time). The topic is What’s Wrong with Personalism? What’s Wrong with Personalism and ‘Theology of the Body’? An Interview with Dom Pietro Leone — by Brother André Marie, M.I.C.M., at catholicism.org The Family Under Attack — book by Dom Pietro Leone at store.catholicism.org  Max Scheler — at Wikipedia.com  Edmund Husserl — at Wikipedia.com  Personalism — at plato.stanford.edu  Phenomenology — at plato.stanford.edu  Phenomenology (philosophy) — at Wikipedia.com   “Reconquest” is a militant, engaging, and informative Catholic radio program featuring interviews with interesting guests as well as commentary by your host. It is a radio-journalistic extension of the Crusade of Saint Benedict Center. Each weekly, one-hour episode of Reconquest will debut RIGHT HERE on Wednesday night at 8:00 PM Eastern (7:00 PM Central). It will then be rebroadcast according to the Crusade Channel programming schedule (note: all times listed are Central time).   What Is The Crusade Channel? The CRUSADE Channel, The Last LIVE! Radio Station Standing begins our LIVE programming with our all original CRUSADE Channel News hosted by 28 year radio ace, Stacey Cohen. Coupled with Mike “The King Dude” Church entertaining you during your morning drive and Rick Barrett giving you the news of the day and the narrative that will follow during your lunch break!  We’ve interviewed over 200 guests, seen Brother Andre Marie notch his 200th broadcast of Reconquest; the The Mike Church Show over 900 episodes; launched an original LIVE! News Service; written and produced 4 Feature Length original dramas including The Last Confession of Sherlock Holmes and set sail on the coolest radio product ever, the 5 Minute Mysteries series! We are the ONLY outlet to cover the Impeachment of President Trump from gavel to gavel!  The Crusade Channel is an open forum for the great thinkers of our time, those who accept the REALITY that Truth is higher than opinion and are willing to speak it with clarity, courage and charity.  Now that you have discovered The Crusade, get 30 days for FREE of our premium service just head to: https://crusadechannel.com OR download our FREE app: https://apps.appmachine.com/theveritasradionetworkappIti- Did you know about Personalism? If you are interested in supporting small business, be sure to check out the official store of the Crusade Channel, the Founders Tradin Post! Not to mention our amazing collection of DVD’s, Cigars, T-Shirts, bumper stickers and other unique selection of items selected by Mike Church! 

Was ist der Mensch eigentlich? Die Antwort auf diese Frage drängt sich gerade in Zeiten einer Pandemie, wie sie auch durch das Virus Sars-CoV-2 ausgelöst wird, auf. Ist der Mensch nur der Natur ausgeliefert oder nicht doch zur Kultur befähigt? Das ist eine Zumutung, aber ein heilsame. Ob man nun glaubt oder nicht: Der Mensch hat es in der Hand, dem Anspruch gerecht zu werden, ein Kulturwesen zu sein.

In this episode, Drs. Smith and Bulzacchelli discuss envy and vanity. They cover: 1. The place of envy in the list 2. Envy in the Parables 3. St Thomas and envy – habit of grieving over the good of another 4. Being Conscious of sins 5. Detraction 6. Vanity and praise 7. Whose opinion matters? 8. Vanity and Modernity Mentioned in this podcast - Max Scheler’s Book “Ressentiment” https://www.amazon.com/Ressentiment-Marquette-Studies-Philosophy-Scheler/dp/0874626021/ref=sr_1_2?keywords=max+scheler&qid=1584980701&sr=8-2

Questo testo è stato tratto dal libro di don Pietro Leone “Il matrimonio sotto attacco”.

Here is the latest of our recordings from The British Society for Phenomenology’s 2018 Annual Conference ‘The Theory and Practice of Phenomenology’. Jack Price is from Cardiff University / the University of Exeter, and the paper is titled ‘Adorno and Scheler on Action and Experience’.   Abstract: “T.W Adorno’s work includes sustained critical engagement with phenomenology. While sympathetic to the attempt to engage with the ‘heterogenous’ and with the world of objects, Adorno argues that traditional phenomenology ultimately fails: Husserl relies too much on constitutive subjectivity and is unable to break from idealism. Perhaps as a result, Adorno tends to pass over much of the work of Max Scheler. Despite this, this paper argues that Scheler’s materialist phenomenology could engage with Adorno’s critical theory to mutual benefit.   Adorno’s work speaks to phenomenological attempts to understand experience. Emphasising the limitations of concepts, the primacy of the object and the value of embodied affective experience, Adorno builds a broad social critique emphasising mediation and the need for moving beyond traditional conceptual thought. But Adorno’s methodological negativity means that his account of the role of embodied subjectivity tends to be laconic, working more as a counterblast to transcendental idealism than as an articulated alternative.   Scheler’s model of the human being is drawn from a twofold distinction between ‘life’ and ‘spirit’, in which ‘life’ represents pre-rational and instinctual drives and behaviours and ‘spirit’ the rational and self-reflective element. The human being is thus not a singular entity ruled by reason, but a creature of conflicting drives, passions, and interests of which reason is a late and by no means omnipotent part. This model of the human being, however, is situated at times quite abstractly. Scheler lacks the critical resources needed to thoroughly interrogate the role of subjectivity under contemporary social conditions.   Dialogue between the two could therefore be very productive. While tensions undeniably exist, Max Scheler’s work, when brought together with Adorno’s critique of constitutive subjectivity and contemporary society, could present a plausible and phenomenologically-minded account of human action and experience under the current social order.”   The British Society for Phenomenology’s Annual Conference took place at the University of Kent, in Canterbury, UK during July, 2018. It gathered together philosophers, literary scholars, phenomenologists, and practitioners exploring phenomenological theory and its practical application. It covered a broad range of areas and issues including the arts, ethics, medical humanities, mental health, education, technology, feminism, politics and political governance, with contributions throwing a new light on both traditional phenomenological thinkers and the themes associated with classical phenomenology. More information about the conference can be found at: https://www.britishphenomenology.org.uk/conference-2018/   The British Society for Phenomenology is a not-for-profit organisation set up with the intention of promoting research and awareness in the field of Phenomenology and other cognate arms of philosophical thought. Currently, the society accomplishes these aims through its journal, conferences and other events, and its podcast. You can support the society by becoming a member, for which you will receive a subscription to our journal: https://www.britishphenomenology.org.uk/about/

DDDr. Peter Egger, Brixen In dieser Sendung geht es um die Phänomenologie und Max Scheler (1874-1928)

António Castro Caeiro é várias pessoas numa só: no mesmo corpo, dentro da mesma cabeça, vive alguém que foi membro da mítica banda punk-rock Mata-Ratos - que lançou músicas como ‘A Minha Sogra é um Boi’ -, alguém que pratica muay thai - porque “gosta de andar à pancada” e depois de ter feito 36 anos de karaté -, ...e, ao mesmo tempo, alguém que é um dos maiores especialistas portugueses em Filosofia Antiga e Contemporânea, que cita directamente do grego clássico e do alemão. Preparem-se, portanto, para uma conversa com um convidado que é tão descontraído quanto erudito.  Apoie o podcast a partir de 2€! https://www.patreon.com/quarentaecincograus Inquérito de feedback dos ouvintes: https://pt.surveymonkey.com/r/GNWLB97 Agradecimentos a patronos do podcast: Gustavo Pimenta; João Vítor Baltazar; Salvador Cunha; Ana Mateus; Ricardo Santos; Nelson Teodoro e Paulo Ferreira João Gil; Vasco Sá Pinto; “Falcão Milenar”; David; Pedro Vaz; Luís Ferreira; Helena Teixeira Créditos da fotografia: Hoje Macau Links: Edmund Husserl: https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edmund_Husserl Fenomenologia: https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fenomenologia Husserl sobre Buda: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232968344_Husserl_on_the_Teachings_of_the_Buddha Heiddeger “Ser e Tempo”: https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ser_e_Tempo Husserl e Heidegger: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KR1TJERFzp0 Autenticidade: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GfkJEWnsNy4 Gottlob Frege: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gottlob_Frege Caetano Veloso ‘Língua’ (“só é possível filosofar em alemão”): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tX7cqBreLUY Democrito, “O Filósofo que ri”: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AiOgFiDSXrM O julgamento de Sócrates: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trial_of_Socrates#Historical_descriptions_of_the_trial Ryan Holiday - ‘The Obsticle is the Way’: https://www.amazon.com/Obstacle-Way-Timeless-Turning-Triumph/dp/1591846358 Dieta cetogénica: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ketogenic_diet Livro sugerido: Isabela Figueiredo - ‘Caderno de memórias coloniais’ Bio: António de Castro Caeiro (n. Lisboa, 1966) é membro da Unidade de Ensino e Investigação "Linguagem, Interpretação e Filosofia" da Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) e membro da Sociedade Ibérica de Filosofia Grega. Obteve o grau de mestre em Filosofia Contemporânea com a tese A doutrina da redução fenomenológica nos Grundprobleme der Phänomenologie de Husserl (1990), pela Faculdade de Ciências Sociais e Humanas (FCSH) da Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), e o grau de doutor em Filosofia Antiga com a tese A Areté como possibilidade extrema do Humano, fenomenologia da práxis em Platão e Aristóteles (1998), pela mesma Universidade. Estudou em Freiburg i. Br. com F.-W. von Herrmann, foi Visiting Scholar na University of South Florida, onde colaborou com Charles Guignon, e ensina na FCSH desde 1990, dedicando-se à Filosofia Antiga e à Filosofia Contemporânea e, em especial, às fenomenologias de Edmund Husserl, Max Scheler e Martin Heidegger. Desde então, também ministra seminários de tradução de textos de teor filosófico em alemão, grego antigo e latim.

This is one of the papers from our 2017 Annual Conference. Information and the full conference booklet can be found at www.britishphenomenology.org.uk A careful reading and interpretation of Max Scheler’s work highlights a thinker concerned with the diversity and multiplicity of human life. As a vehement critic of reductionism, determinism and the focus of phenomenology on the individual subject, Scheler offers trenchant insights and arguments which retain their power today. This paper begins by outlining Scheler’s conception of the human being, highlighting its distinction from a classical Husserlian model. For Scheler, it is wrong to conceive of the mind as reason alone. Instead, he offers a broadly tripartite division of mind into the drives and instincts common to the lowest forms of life, habitual and adaptive intelligent behaviours developed by higher animals, and finally self-reflective, rational spirit as the specifically human achievement. Perceptions, and especially intentions, operate on a pre-rational level. Pure experience, free of intentionality and interpretation, is therefore impossible: meanings are hardwired into any conscious experience and any attempt to bracket them away will fail. Sympathy likewise works at a pre-rational level; it is, for Scheler, the means through which we come to know ourselves. We recognise the other as an individual, and it is through our interaction with them (in particular, through love) that we come to be an individual ourselves. ‘Our’ world is therefore not our own. It is given form and substance by our social–cultural environment and the interactions we have with others. The problem of other minds, which so plagued Husserl, is thereby dissolved. We have, for Scheler, simply got it the wrong way around. Evaluating Scheler’s arguments, I conclude that it is important not only to see Scheler as a contributor to the grand phenomenological tradition, but to appreciate his role as an original and insightful critic of that tradition, with much to contribute to current problems.

Als Phänomenologie wird eine der maßgeblichen philosophische Strömungen des 20. Jahrhunderts bezeichnet, die vor allem von Edmund Husserl (1859-1938) ausgearbeitet wurde. Bekannte Phänomenologen sind z.B. Max Scheler, Martin Heidegger, Jean-Paul Sartre, Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Emmanuel Lévinas, Paul Ricoeur und Jaques Derrida. Diesen Beitrag als 35minütigen Audio-Podcast anhören: Die Phänomenologie hat Denker wie Theodor W. Adorno, Jaques […]