Israeli American professor of psychology and behavioral economics
POPULARITY
13 episodes with ariely
3 episodes with ariely
2 episodes with ariely
2 episodes with ariely
2 episodes with ariely
2 episodes with ariely
2 episodes with ariely
2 episodes with ariely
2 episodes with ariely
Something for nothingDo rewards and incentives damage our humanity?In much of our personal and professional lives, we receive rewards for good behaviour and carrying out our responsibilities. But, evidence now suggests there are risks to this approach. Studies show rewards can damage wellbeing, fostering dependence and undermining our own sense of control. And neuroscientists have shown those more prone to seeking reward have a 70% higher risk of addiction, with addictive behaviour now present in almost half of the U.S. population. So, should we move away from rewards-based systems, and instead learn to value doing the right thing simply for the sake of, well, doing the right thing?Paul Bloom is a Canadian-American psychologist, bestselling author, and celebrated speaker. Bloom has written widely on human nature, and he won the Klaus J. Jacobs Research Prize for his investigations into how children develop a sense of morality.Dan Ariely is a Professor of Psychology and Behavioural Economics at Duke University and best-selling author. Ariely is a scholar of irrationality and decision-making, explaining how we repeatedly and predictably make the wrong decisions in many aspects of our lives.Nancy Sherman is a Professor of Philosophy at Georgetown University who has conducted research in general ethics, moral psychology, and the history of philosophy with focus on the Stoic tradition. A New York Times Notable Author and sought-after speaker, her views on military ethics have been influential. Don't hesitate to email us at podcast@iai.tv with your thoughts or questions on the episode!To witness such debates live buy tickets for our upcoming festival: https://howthelightgetsin.org/festivals/And visit our website for many more articles, videos, and podcasts like this one: https://iai.tv/You can find everything we referenced here: https://linktr.ee/philosophyforourtimesSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Oatly, Tony's, Ecosia and more all use behavioural science to persuade you. Today, author and founder Chris Baker explains how. You'll learn about: Tony's viral advent calendar. Oatly's tiny change that transformed the coffee industry. Ecosia's smart nudge to keep users hooked. And one behavioural science principle Chris used to launch his brand. --- Use code Obsolete25 for 25% off Chris's book: https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/obsolete-9781399416658/ Follow Chris on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/cjpbaker/ Oatly's old and new packaging: https://im.ge/i/image.vcr5tq Sign up to my newsletter: https://www.nudgepodcast.com/mailing-list Connect on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/phill-agnew-22213187/ Watch Nudge on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@nudgepodcast/ --- Sources: Baker, C. (2024). Obsolete: How change brands are changing the world. Bloomsbury Business. Ferster, C. B., & Skinner, B. F. (1957). Schedules of reinforcement. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts. Mohan, B., Buell, R. W., & John, L. K. (2020). Lifting the veil: The benefits of cost transparency. Marketing Science, 39(6), 1048–1062. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2019.1200 Norton, M. I., Mochon, D., & Ariely, D. (2011). The IKEA effect: When labor leads to love. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(3), 453–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2011.08.002 Raghunathan, R., Naylor, R. W., & Hoyer, W. D. (2006). The unhealthy = tasty intuition and its effects on taste inferences, enjoyment, and choice of food products. Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 170–184. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.70.4.170
¿Puede un placebo mejorar tu rendimiento deportivo real, incluso si no tomaste nada? ¿Qué procesos biológicos se activan en tu cuerpo solo por creer que algo funciona? Tu cerebro puede hacerte rendir más, sentir menos dolor e incluso recuperarte antes… solo con creer que algo va a funcionar. ¿Dónde está el límite entre lo fisiológico y lo psicológico? ¿Y si la mente fuera el factor olvidado del rendimiento? _____________________________________________________ Newsletter para entrenadores: https://hijosdelaresistencia.com/para-entrenadores-que-quieren-dejar-un-legado/ ————————- Accede a la web de Fanté https://bit.ly/WebFant%C3%A9 Elige lo que prefieras: 10% descuento con el código PODCASTHDLR Acceso a regalos y formación exclusiva con el código REGALOHDLR ————————- Apúntate a nuestra Newsletter aquí: https://hijosdelaresistencia.com/un-email-semanal Entrena con nosotros: https://hijosdelaresistencia.com/formulario/ Accede a La Academia https://academia.hijosdelaresistencia.com/ ____________________________________________________________ También pueden seguirnos en nuestras redes sociales https://www.instagram.com/hijosdelaresistencia_oficial/ https://www.instagram.com/ruben.espinosa_/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Referencias científicas 1. Beecher, H. K. (1955). The powerful placebo. Journal of the American Medical Association, 159(17), 1602–1606. 2. Moseley, J. B., O'Malley, K., Petersen, N. J., Menke, T. J., Brody, B. A., Kuykendall, D. H., Hollingsworth, J. C., Ashton, C. M., & Wray, N. P. (2002). A controlled trial of arthroscopic surgery for osteoarthritis of the knee. The New England Journal of Medicine, 347(2), 81–88. 3. Beard, D. J., Rees, J. L., Cook, J. A., Rombach, I., Cooper, C., Merritt, N., ... & Carr, A. J. (2018). Arthroscopic subacromial decompression for subacromial shoulder pain (CSAW): a multicentre, pragmatic, parallel group, placebo-controlled, three-group, randomised surgical trial. The Lancet, 391(10118), 329–338. 4. Stone, M. R., Thomas, K., Wilkinson, M., Jones, A. M., St Clair Gibson, A., & Thompson, K. G. (2012). Effects of deception on exercise performance: Implications for determinants of fatigue in humans. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 44(3), 534–541. 5. Beedie, C. J., & Foad, A. J. (2009). The placebo effect in sports performance: a brief review. Sports Medicine, 39(4), 313–329. 6. Waber, R. L., Shiv, B., Carmon, Z., & Ariely, D. (2008). Commercial features of placebo and therapeutic efficacy. Journal of the American Medical Association, 299(9), 1016–1017. 7. Kaptchuk, T. J., Friedlander, E., Kelley, J. M., Sanchez, M. N., Kokkotou, E., Singer, J. P., Kowalczykowski, M., Miller, F. G., Kirsch, I., & Lembo, A. J. (2010). Placebos without deception: A randomized controlled trial in irritable bowel syndrome. PLoS ONE, 5(12), e15591.
Recomendados de la semana en iVoox.com Semana del 5 al 11 de julio del 2021
¿Puede un placebo mejorar tu rendimiento deportivo real, incluso si no tomaste nada? ¿Qué procesos biológicos se activan en tu cuerpo solo por creer que algo funciona? Tu cerebro puede hacerte rendir más, sentir menos dolor e incluso recuperarte antes… solo con creer que algo va a funcionar. ¿Dónde está el límite entre lo fisiológico y lo psicológico? ¿Y si la mente fuera el factor olvidado del rendimiento? _____________________________________________________ Newsletter para entrenadores: https://hijosdelaresistencia.com/para-entrenadores-que-quieren-dejar-un-legado/ ————————- Accede a la web de Fanté https://bit.ly/WebFant%C3%A9 Elige lo que prefieras: 10% descuento con el código PODCASTHDLR Acceso a regalos y formación exclusiva con el código REGALOHDLR ————————- Apúntate a nuestra Newsletter aquí: https://hijosdelaresistencia.com/un-email-semanal Entrena con nosotros: https://hijosdelaresistencia.com/formulario/ Accede a La Academia https://academia.hijosdelaresistencia.com/ ____________________________________________________________ También pueden seguirnos en nuestras redes sociales👇🏻https://www.instagram.com/hijosdelaresistencia_oficial/ https://www.instagram.com/ruben.espinosa_/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 📚 Referencias científicas 1. Beecher, H. K. (1955). The powerful placebo. Journal of the American Medical Association, 159(17), 1602–1606. 2. Moseley, J. B., O'Malley, K., Petersen, N. J., Menke, T. J., Brody, B. A., Kuykendall, D. H., Hollingsworth, J. C., Ashton, C. M., & Wray, N. P. (2002). A controlled trial of arthroscopic surgery for osteoarthritis of the knee. The New England Journal of Medicine, 347(2), 81–88. 3. Beard, D. J., Rees, J. L., Cook, J. A., Rombach, I., Cooper, C., Merritt, N., ... & Carr, A. J. (2018). Arthroscopic subacromial decompression for subacromial shoulder pain (CSAW): a multicentre, pragmatic, parallel group, placebo-controlled, three-group, randomised surgical trial. The Lancet, 391(10118), 329–338. 4. Stone, M. R., Thomas, K., Wilkinson, M., Jones, A. M., St Clair Gibson, A., & Thompson, K. G. (2012). Effects of deception on exercise performance: Implications for determinants of fatigue in humans. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 44(3), 534–541. 5. Beedie, C. J., & Foad, A. J. (2009). The placebo effect in sports performance: a brief review. Sports Medicine, 39(4), 313–329. 6. Waber, R. L., Shiv, B., Carmon, Z., & Ariely, D. (2008). Commercial features of placebo and therapeutic efficacy. Journal of the American Medical Association, 299(9), 1016–1017. 7. Kaptchuk, T. J., Friedlander, E., Kelley, J. M., Sanchez, M. N., Kokkotou, E., Singer, J. P., Kowalczykowski, M., Miller, F. G., Kirsch, I., & Lembo, A. J. (2010). Placebos without deception: A randomized controlled trial in irritable bowel syndrome. PLoS ONE, 5(12), e15591.
The Francesca Gino scandal shook the academic world, exposing fraudulent research practices at one of the world's most prestigious institutions, Harvard Business School. This episode unpacks the details of the case, from the initial discoveries to the implications for science. You'll learn: How a PhD student uncovered data manipulation in a high-profile study (feat. Zoe Xani's investigation). The critical role of whistleblowers in exposing fraud (feat. Data Colada's analysis). Key findings from Harvard's 1,300-page report on research misconduct. Which studies were faked and what they claimed to find. How self-correcting mechanisms can strengthen trust despite scandals. ---- Sign up to my newsletter: https://www.nudgepodcast.com/mailing-list Connect on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/phill-agnew-22213187/ Watch Nudge on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@nudgepodcast/ ---- Sources: Data Colada. (2023). [109] Data falsificada (Part 1): “Clusterfake”. https://datacolada.org/109 Data Colada. (2023). Data falsificada (Part 1): Evidence that Francesca Gino fabricated data. Data Colada. Retrieved from https://datacolada.org/110 Data Colada. (2023). Data falsificada (Part 3): The cheaters are out of order. Data Colada. Retrieved from https://datacolada.org/111 Data Colada. (2023). Data falsificada (Part 4): Forgetting the words. Data Colada. Retrieved from https://datacolada.org/112 Data Colada. (2024). [116] Our (first?) day in court. https://datacolada.org/116 Data Colada. (2024). [118] Harvard's Gino Report Reveals How A Dataset Was Altered, Data Colada. https://datacolada.org/118 Dalton, R. (2023, October 18). Embattled Harvard honesty professor accused of plagiarism. Science. Retrieved January 6, 2025, from https://www.science.org/content/article/embattled-harvard-honesty-professor-accused-plagiarism Dubner, S. J. (2024). Why is there so much fraud in academia? (Update) [Audio podcast episode]. In Freakonomics Radio. Freakonomics, LLC. https://freakonomics.com/podcast/why-is-there-so-much-fraud-in-academia-update/ Dubner, S. J. (2025). Can academic fraud be stopped? (Update) [Audio podcast episode]. In Freakonomics Radio. Freakonomics, LLC. https://freakonomics.com/podcast/can-academic-fraud-be-stopped-update/ Gino, F., Kouchaki, M., & Galinsky, A. D. (2015). The moral virtue of authenticity: How inauthenticity produces feelings of immorality and impurity. Psychological Science, 26(7), 983–996. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615575277 Gino, F., & Wiltermuth, S. S. (2014). Evil genius? How dishonesty can lead to greater creativity. Psychological Science, 25(4), 973–981. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614520714 Gino, F., Kouchaki, M., & Casciaro, T. (2020). Why connect? Moral consequences of networking with a promotion or prevention focus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2Fpspa0000226 Harari, Y. N. (2024). Nexus: A brief history of information networks from the Stone Age to AI. Fern Press. Judo, P. (2024). It's over – Gino vs Harvard fake data scandal [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/Q9tgyVPytBk Konnikova, M. (2023). They studied dishonesty. Was their work a lie? The New Yorker. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2023/10/09/they-studied-dishonesty-was-their-work-a-lie Lewis-Karus. (2024). How a scientific dispute spiraled into a defamation lawsuit. The New Yorker. https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/how-a-scientific-dispute-spiralled-into-a-defamation-lawsuit Shu, L. L., Mazar, N., Gino, F., Ariely, D., & Bazerman, M. H. (2012). Signing at the beginning makes ethics salient and decreases dishonest self-reports in comparison to signing at the end. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(38), 15197–15200. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1209746109
Looking to connect with a community of physician podcasters? We provide the tools, connections, and resources you need to amplify your voice and grow your audience. Be part of something exciting as we prepare to launch. Join the Doctor Podcast Network today!—---------Dr. John Schnieder and Professor Dan Ariely continue their analysis of healthcare and decision-making in the second part of their conversation, expanding on the points discussed earlier. They delve deeper into how doctors experience "moral injuries" when forced to make choices that conflict with what they know is best for their patients, often due to systemic rules and pressures. This can result in stress, frustration, and burnout.Professor Ariely explains how uncertainty and lack of control in healthcare—like unclear rules or too many forms—can harm trust and make it harder for everyone to do their best. They also talk about how giving people too many choices, like making parents decide on tough medical treatments, can cause unnecessary stress and regret.They also discussed the need to improve healthcare by prioritizing long-term patient care, reducing unnecessary burdens on doctors, and building systems that foster trust, mental health, and teamwork.BioDan Ariely is an Israeli-American professor and behavioral economist known for exploring irrational decision-making. A traumatic accident in his youth, which left him with severe burns, shaped his interest in human behavior. He earned degrees in philosophy, psychology, and business administration, including a Ph.D. from Duke University, where he is now the James B. Duke Professor of Psychology and Behavioral Economics. Ariely founded the Center for Advanced Hindsight, focusing on topics like money psychology, healthcare decisions, and ethics.He is a best-selling author of books such as Predictably Irrational and The Honest Truth About Dishonesty, which challenge traditional economic theories. Ariely has co-founded companies, including BEworks and Lemonade, applying behavioral insights to practical challenges. His work has garnered numerous accolades, including the Ig Nobel Prize in Medicine. Despite controversies, Ariely remains a leading voice in behavioral science, inspiring research, business innovations, and media projects like NBC's The Irrational. Website:Behavioral science | Behavioral economics | Center for advanced hindsightLinkedIn:https://www.linkedin.com/in/danariely?trk=contact-infoInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/danariely?igsh=YzljYTk1ODg3Zg== Dr. John Schnieder bio:https://www.physiciansguidetodoctoring.com/drschneider Did you know…You can also be a guest on our show ? Please email me at brad@physiciansguidetodoctoring.com to connect or visit www.physiciansguidetodoctoring.com to learn more about the show!Socials:@physiciansguidetodoctoring on FB@physicianguidetodoctoring on YouTube@physiciansguide on Instagram and Twitter Visit www.physiciansguidetodoctoring.com to connect, dive deeper, and keep the conversation going. Let's grow! Disclaimer:This podcast is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional medical, financial, or legal advice. Always consult a qualified professional for personalized guidance.
Looking to connect with a community of physician podcasters? We provide the tools, connections, and resources you need to amplify your voice and grow your audience. Be part of something exciting as we prepare to launch. Join the Doctor Podcast Network today!—-----In this episode, Professor Dan Ariely is interviewed by Dr John Schneider about the complexities of medicine, bureaucracy, and healthcare experiences. Professor Ariely discusses how rigid bureaucratic systems often disconnect from the core mission of patient care, leading to stress, reduced autonomy, and burnout among physicians. He also spoke about the "scarcity mindset," where limited resources like time and energy force rigid approaches, overwhelming both doctors and patients.He highlighted the importance of trust in healthcare. When physicians feel undervalued, it fosters frustration and burnout. Similarly, patients losing trust in providers may turn to alternative treatments that are less effective or harmful.To improve, Professor Ariely suggests collaboration between administrators and physicians to balance efficiency with compassion. By valuing expertise and fostering trust, healthcare systems can restore patients' confidence and make physicians' work more rewarding. BioDan Ariely is an Israeli-American professor and behavioral economist known for exploring irrational decision-making. His interest in human behavior was shaped by a traumatic accident in his youth, leaving him with severe burns. He earned degrees in philosophy, psychology, and business administration, including a Ph.D. from Duke University, where he is now the James B. Duke Professor of Psychology and Behavioral Economics. Ariely founded the Center for Advanced Hindsight, focusing on topics like money psychology, healthcare decisions, and ethics.He is a best-selling author of books such as Predictably Irrational and The Honest Truth About Dishonesty, which challenge traditional economic theories. Ariely has co-founded companies, including BEworks and Lemonade, applying behavioral insights to practical challenges. His work has garnered numerous accolades, including the Ig Nobel Prize in Medicine. Despite controversies, Ariely remains a leading voice in behavioral science, inspiring research, business innovations, and media projects like NBC's The Irrational. Website:Behavioral science | Behavioral economics | Center for advanced hindsightLinkedIn:https://www.linkedin.com/in/danariely?trk=contact-infoInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/danariely?igsh=YzljYTk1ODg3Zg== Dr. Dan Schnieders' bio:https://www.physiciansguidetodoctoring.com/drschneider Did you know…You can also be a guest on our show? Please email me at brad@physiciansguidetodoctoring.com to connect or visit www.physiciansguidetodoctoring.com to learn more about the show!Socials:@physiciansguidetodoctoring on FB@physicianguidetodoctoring on YouTube@physiciansguide on Instagram and Twitter Visit www.physiciansguidetodoctoring.com to connect, dive deeper, and keep the conversation going. Let's grow! Disclaimer:This podcast is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional medical, financial, or legal advice. Always consult a qualified professional for personalized guidance.
Value School | Ahorro, finanzas personales, economía, inversión y value investing
Con gran sentido del humor y profundos conocimientos de economía conductual Dan Ariely nos ayuda en este libro a entender nuestras finanzas personales y por qué tomamos tantas decisiones irracionales. para ayudar por qué tomamos algunas decisiones, muchas de ellas equivocadas. Junto con el divulgador y experto financiero Jeff Kreisler, Ariely analiza una amplia gama de ejemplos cotidianos para demostrar cómo nuestras ideas sobre la gestión del dinero a menudo están equivocadas y nos convierten en nuestros peores enemigos. Daniel Ariely Nació en Nueva York en 1968. De nacionalidad israelí, fue soldado y abandonó el ejército a causa de un accidente que le causó graves quemaduras. Estudió Física y Matemáticas en la Universidad de Tel–Aviv y después Filosofía. En Estados Unidos obtuvo un máster en Psicología cognitiva por la Universidad de Carolina del Norte y se doctoró en Negocios en la Universidad de Duke, donde luego fue profesor de Economía de la conducta. Es jefe del grupo de investigación eRationality en el Media Lab del Instituto Tecnológico de Massachussets. Publica en numerosas revistas académicas y en periódicos tales como The New York Times, Wall st. Journal, The New Yorker y Scientific American, e interviene en programas de radio y televisión en Nacional Public Radio, CNN y CNBC. Domingo Soriano Domingo Soriano es uno de los periodistas de información económica más conocidos de España. Es licenciado en Derecho y ADE por la Universidad Carlos III de Madrid y número uno de su promoción del máster de periodismo de la Universidad San Pablo-CEU y El Mundo Unidad Editorial. Presentador de programas tan populares como La pizarra de Domingo Soriano, Tu dinero nunca duerme y el «podcast» Economía para quedarte sin amigos, Domingo lleva más de una década escribiendo sobre economía en Libertad Digital, analizando medidas de política económica en esRadio y en tertulias de televisión, y enseñando economía a estudiantes de la Universidad Francisco Marroquín. Marcos Álvarez Marcos Álvarez es responsable de comunicación de Más Dividendos y responsable de relación con inversores de Adarve Gestión de Activos. Estudió Ingeniería Técnica Industrial por la Universidad Politécnica de Madrid y es consultor SAP e inversor autodidacta. Lleva más de 15 años practicando y defendiendo la inversión racional a largo plazo, las finanzas, y las relaciones de confianza. Defensor de la inversión racional a largo plazo, las finanzas, y las relaciones de confianza, Marcos es colaborador habitual en programas de divulgación financiera en radio, en prensa y en foros de inversión.
In this episode, I explore how architectural thinking enhances strategic decision-making with Adam Griff. Our conversation reveals how his architectural background shapes his approach to helping higher education institutions navigate complex decisions and create flexible space solutions. We dig into the challenges of designing spaces that can adapt to unknown futures and discuss how universities can better integrate with their communities. I particularly love how Adam frames flexibility in building design as creating platforms for future adaptations rather than just multi-purpose spaces. We also explore the tension between academic and organizational decision-making and how to create and decide while delivering innovation in higher education. Questions This Episode Helps You Answer How does thinking like an architect help organizations make better strategic decisions? What makes flexibility essential in both physical spaces and organizational processes, and how can we intentionally design for it from the beginning? What elements create environments where good decisions emerge, and how can we support better decision-making outcomes? How do we determine whether physical space is the best solution for achieving our organizational goals, and what questions should we ask before investing in space? How can we think about buildings as adaptable platforms that support evolving human needs rather than fixed structures with predetermined uses? How might universities and colleges create meaningful connections between campus development and community growth that benefit both? What strategies help organizations balance the need for scholarly rigor with efficient administrative decision-making, and how can these different approaches work together effectively? Episode Highlights [00:00] Introduction and background on Adam Griff [01:38] How architectural thinking shapes strategic problem-solving [04:17] Managing diverse stakeholders in higher education contexts [05:35] Understanding people's needs versus asking for solutions [07:31] Orchestrating organizational decision-making [09:13] The importance of decision-making culture in institutions [11:20] Building trust and managing participation in decisions [14:15] Creating shared understanding of evidence and good decisions [17:04] Balancing organizational conditions with decision quality [19:38] Making decisions with incomplete information [21:36] Academic versus administrative approaches to decisions [24:40] Rethinking flexibility in organizational strategy [25:25] Space as a medium for service delivery [26:51] Designing buildings as platforms for adaptation [29:14] Lifecycle costs and sustainable building design [30:48] Integration of campus and community development [33:31] Responding to demographic changes in higher education [35:33] Finding what is "uniquely possible" for institutions [39:12] Moving from master planning to scenario-based "playbooks" [41:09] Closing thoughts and connecting with Adam Questions to Help You Go Deeper Learning How does architectural thinking about constraints and systems change your approach to organizational challenges? What surprised you about our discussion of decision-making quality? Why? Leading How might you redesign decision-making environments in your organization? What would change if you approached strategic planning as creating a playbook rather than a rigid strategic plan? Applying What's one small experiment you could run next week to improve your team's decision-making space? Choose a current project or challenge. How might it benefit from thinking about systems and constraints like an architect? Practicing How will you incorporate the "Is space the right medium?" question into your solution development process? What is one idea from the episode that you will apply in the next two two weeks? Guest Resources Adam on LinkedIn Adam on Academia Gamification: How to Play Gensler Gensler Research & Insights Stewart Brand's "How Buildings Learn" The High Line, NYC Higher education demographic/enrollment cliff Scenario planning methodologies COM-B behavior change model Stranded assets Resources I Recommend DT101 Episodes Radical Participatory Design + Relationships in Complex Systems Inclusive Design with Victor Udoewa — DT101 E127 Talk to the Elephant: Design Learning for Behavior Change with Julie Dirksen — DT101 E131 Healthcare Design: Evidence-based, Business Fluent, and Change Prepared with Matt Van Der Tuyn — DT101 E140 Books Brown, Peter C., Henry L. Roediger, and Mark A. McDaniel. Make It Stick: The Science of Successful Learning. Cambridge, Mass: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2014. -- Orchestrating good decisions requires understanding how people learn. Before people can decide about something new they must learn the information they need to know to make a good decision and what constitutes a good decision in this context. Read chapter 8. Ariely, Dan. Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions. Revised and Expanded edition, First Harper Perennial edition published. Harper Business & Economics. New York: Harper Perennial, 2010. -- Ariely walks you through ways we make decisions that conflict with classic economic rationality, like: The Effect of Expectations: Our preconceptions and expectations significantly influence our experiences and decisions. For instance, people report greater pain relief from more expensive placebos, demonstrating how price can affect perceived value. The Cost of Ownership: Once we own something, we tend to overvalue it (the "endowment effect"). Heath, Chip, and Dan Heath. Decisive: How to Make Better Choices in Life and Work. New York: Random House Books, 2014. -- Don't trust your gut. It hates you. You'll learn how to slow down and avoid becoming a cautionary tale like the ones in this book. Kahneman, Daniel. Thinking, Fast and Slow. First paperback edition. Psychology/Economics. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2013. -- "Thinking, Fast and Slow" reveals how our minds use both quick instincts and careful analysis to make choices, helping innovators design solutions that work with human psychology rather than against it. Thaler, Richard H., and Cass R. Sunstein. Nudge: Improving Decisions about Money, Health, and the Environment. Final edition. New York: Penguin Books, an imprint of Penguin Random House LLC, 2021. -- Nudge "Nudge" reveals how small changes in how choices are presented can dramatically impact decision-making and behavior at scale, while preserving freedom of choice. I'd love to hear what insights you're taking away from this exploration of architecture, strategy, and organizational design. Share your thoughts and stay updated at https://fluidhive.com/design-thinking-101-podcast/ Stay lucky ~ Dawan
In this episode, I explore how architectural thinking enhances strategic decision-making with Adam Griff. Our conversation reveals how his architectural background shapes his approach to helping higher education institutions navigate complex decisions and create flexible space solutions. We dig into the challenges of designing spaces that can adapt to unknown futures and discuss how universities can better integrate with their communities. I particularly love how Adam frames flexibility in building design as creating platforms for future adaptations rather than just multi-purpose spaces. We also explore the tension between academic and organizational decision-making and how to create and decide while delivering innovation in higher education. Questions This Episode Helps You Answer How does thinking like an architect help organizations make better strategic decisions? What makes flexibility essential in both physical spaces and organizational processes, and how can we intentionally design for it from the beginning? What elements create environments where good decisions emerge, and how can we support better decision-making outcomes? How do we determine whether physical space is the best solution for achieving our organizational goals, and what questions should we ask before investing in space? How can we think about buildings as adaptable platforms that support evolving human needs rather than fixed structures with predetermined uses? How might universities and colleges create meaningful connections between campus development and community growth that benefit both? What strategies help organizations balance the need for scholarly rigor with efficient administrative decision-making, and how can these different approaches work together effectively? Episode Highlights [00:00] Introduction and background on Adam Griff [01:38] How architectural thinking shapes strategic problem-solving [04:17] Managing diverse stakeholders in higher education contexts [05:35] Understanding people's needs versus asking for solutions [07:31] Orchestrating organizational decision-making [09:13] The importance of decision-making culture in institutions [11:20] Building trust and managing participation in decisions [14:15] Creating shared understanding of evidence and good decisions [17:04] Balancing organizational conditions with decision quality [19:38] Making decisions with incomplete information [21:36] Academic versus administrative approaches to decisions [24:40] Rethinking flexibility in organizational strategy [25:25] Space as a medium for service delivery [26:51] Designing buildings as platforms for adaptation [29:14] Lifecycle costs and sustainable building design [30:48] Integration of campus and community development [33:31] Responding to demographic changes in higher education [35:33] Finding what is "uniquely possible" for institutions [39:12] Moving from master planning to scenario-based "playbooks" [41:09] Closing thoughts and connecting with Adam Questions to Help You Go Deeper Learning How does architectural thinking about constraints and systems change your approach to organizational challenges? What surprised you about our discussion of decision-making quality? Why? Leading How might you redesign decision-making environments in your organization? What would change if you approached strategic planning as creating a playbook rather than a rigid strategic plan? Applying What's one small experiment you could run next week to improve your team's decision-making space? Choose a current project or challenge. How might it benefit from thinking about systems and constraints like an architect? Practicing How will you incorporate the "Is space the right medium?" question into your solution development process? What is one idea from the episode that you will apply in the next two two weeks? Guest Resources Adam on LinkedIn Adam on Academia Gamification: How to Play Gensler Gensler Research & Insights Stewart Brand's "How Buildings Learn" The High Line, NYC Higher education demographic/enrollment cliff Scenario planning methodologies COM-B behavior change model Stranded assets Resources I Recommend DT101 Episodes Radical Participatory Design + Relationships in Complex Systems Inclusive Design with Victor Udoewa — DT101 E127 Talk to the Elephant: Design Learning for Behavior Change with Julie Dirksen — DT101 E131 Healthcare Design: Evidence-based, Business Fluent, and Change Prepared with Matt Van Der Tuyn — DT101 E140 Books Brown, Peter C., Henry L. Roediger, and Mark A. McDaniel. Make It Stick: The Science of Successful Learning. Cambridge, Mass: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2014. -- Orchestrating good decisions requires understanding how people learn. Before people can decide about something new they must learn the information they need to know to make a good decision and what constitutes a good decision in this context. Read chapter 8. Ariely, Dan. Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions. Revised and Expanded edition, First Harper Perennial edition published. Harper Business & Economics. New York: Harper Perennial, 2010. -- Ariely walks you through ways we make decisions that conflict with classic economic rationality, like: The Effect of Expectations: Our preconceptions and expectations significantly influence our experiences and decisions. For instance, people report greater pain relief from more expensive placebos, demonstrating how price can affect perceived value. The Cost of Ownership: Once we own something, we tend to overvalue it (the "endowment effect"). Heath, Chip, and Dan Heath. Decisive: How to Make Better Choices in Life and Work. New York: Random House Books, 2014. -- Don't trust your gut. It hates you. You'll learn how to slow down and avoid becoming a cautionary tale like the ones in this book. Kahneman, Daniel. Thinking, Fast and Slow. First paperback edition. Psychology/Economics. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2013. -- "Thinking, Fast and Slow" reveals how our minds use both quick instincts and careful analysis to make choices, helping innovators design solutions that work with human psychology rather than against it. Thaler, Richard H., and Cass R. Sunstein. Nudge: Improving Decisions about Money, Health, and the Environment. Final edition. New York: Penguin Books, an imprint of Penguin Random House LLC, 2021. -- Nudge "Nudge" reveals how small changes in how choices are presented can dramatically impact decision-making and behavior at scale, while preserving freedom of choice. I'd love to hear what insights you're taking away from this exploration of architecture, strategy, and organizational design. Share your thoughts and stay updated at https://fluidhive.com/design-thinking-101-podcast/ Stay lucky ~ Dawan
In the episode we explore why human beings sometimes behave irrationally. We discuss the irrationality of the middle east conflict, doctor patient decision making, self deception and a lot more with Dr. Dan Ariely.Dan Ariely (Hebrew: דן אריאלי; born April 29, 1967) is an Israeli-American professor and author. He serves as a James B. Duke Professor of psychology and behavioral economics at Duke University. He is the co-founder of several companies implementing insights from behavioral science.[1] Ariely wrote an advice column called "Ask Ariely" in The Wall Street Journal from June 2012 until September 2022.[2] He is the author of the three New York Times best selling books Predictably Irrational, The Upside of Irrationality, and The Honest Truth about Dishonesty.[3] He co-produced the 2015 documentary (Dis)Honesty: The Truth About Lies.[4]His laboratory at Duke, the Center for Advanced Hindsight, pursues research in subjects like the psychology of money, decision making by physicians and patients, cheating, and social justice
Dan Ariely is a famed behavioral economist who looks at the irrational, upside-down ways that humans think and act. His recent interests include resilience - something he's had to build up in his own life after a serious burn accident in his teens. Ariely is a professor at Duke University and the author of bestselling books like “The Upside of Irrationality.” Host Morra Aarons-Mele speaks to him about mental health, human behavior, and overcoming challenges. Watch Dan's Ted Talks: https://www.ted.com/speakers/dan_ariely How a Terrible Accident Inspired Dan Ariely's Career Path How an Injury Led Me to Irrationality
Dan Ariely is a renowned behavioral economist and the James B. Duke Professor of Psychology and Behavioral Economics at Duke University. He is a founding member of the Center for Advanced Hindsight, where he conducts research on decision-making, cognitive biases, and human behavior. Ariely is also an accomplished author, known for his best-selling books such as "Predictably Irrational" and "The Upside of Irrationality," which explore the hidden forces that shape our decisions. His latest book, "Misbelief," delves into the psychological mechanisms behind why people adopt irrational beliefs. TRANSCRIPT:https://share.transistor.fm/s/73b38f60/transcript.txtEPISODE LINKS:Dan's Website: https://danariely.comPODCAST INFO:YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCdpxjDVYNfJuth9Oo4z2iGQApple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/au/podcast/pop-culture/id1584438354Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/2gWvUUYFwFvzHUnMdlmTaIRSS: https://feeds.transistor.fm/popcultureSOCIALS:- Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/tysonpopplestone/- YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@tysonpopplestone9467
This week's guest turned tragedy into tech innovation with a platform designed to transform the way we all deal with death. Sam Grice, CEO and Founder of Octopus Legacy (formerly Guardian Angel) has created a platform that manages all aspects surrounding death; from will creation to bereavement support. Sam was always destined from entrepreneurial success, as both his parents were keen entrepreneurs, and he put his hereditary expertise to the test with a food and supplement side hustle. However, it wasn't until the tragic loss of his mum, did the full extent of Sam's passion for innovation flourish with the creation of Guardian Angel (now Octopus Legacy). Being a key player in propelling the death-tech industry forward, Sam is a tech leader that is paving the way in an industry that affects each and every one of us. This episode covers an incredibly inspirational entrepreneurial journey and is not to be missed!Time stamps What does good leadership mean to Sam? (02:10) Early exposure to life as an entrepreneur (03:25) Starting out with a side hustle (06:00) The tragedy that shaped Sam's tech career (08:18) Creating Guardian Angel (12:12) Overcoming the obstacles within death-tech (17:04) What is a founder's ‘kryptonite'? (22:00) Acquisition by Octopus Group (29:12) The Future of Octopus Legacy (33:31) How Sam achieves balance (43:10) Advice to young founders (44:43) Book recommendation: Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions, Dr, Dan Ariely - Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions: Amazon.co.uk: Ariely, Dr Dan: 9780061854545: Books
Dan Ariely Navigating Misinformation with Empathy: Misbelief with Dan Ariely This episode features Dan Ariely, author of 'Misbelief, what makes rational people believe irrational things', focusing on the psychology behind misinformation and belief in conspiracy theories. Ariely discusses how stress, personality traits, and social dynamics contribute to the spread of false beliefs, emphasising the importance of resilience and trust in combating misinformation. He shares personal experiences, including being targeted by disinformation, and highlights his role in the NBC show 'The Irrational' that combines social science with solving crimes. The conversation touches on various psychological concepts, the impact of cognitive biases, and the role of social context in shaping beliefs. Ariely proposes empathy and understanding over conflict in addressing belief in misinformation and discusses the broader implications of trust erosion in society. 00:00 Unraveling the Web of Misinformation 01:12 Welcome Dan Ariely: Exploring Misbelief 02:15 The Making of 'The Irrational': A TV Show Inspired by Real Science 06:13 Embracing Imperfections: The Philosophy of Kintsugi 12:22 The Personal Impact of Misinformation on Dan Ariely 18:39 The Psychological Journey into Misbelief 22:08 Navigating the Flood of Misinformation in the Digital Age 26:42 The Role of Stress in Cultivating Misbeliefs 33:49 Challenging Cognitive Biases and Misbeliefs 40:01 Navigating Societal Divides: The Abortion Debate 40:59 The Power of Uncertainty in Dialogue 41:25 Innovation and the 'Us vs. Them' Mentality 42:33 Exploring the Dunning-Kruger Effect 47:15 The Role of Memory in Shaping Beliefs 49:02 Personality Traits and Susceptibility to Misbelief 52:07 Social Dynamics: Ostracism and Its Effects 01:01:38 Understanding Cognitive Dissonance 01:07:13 The Importance of Resilience and Trust 01:15:52 Concluding Thoughts on Misbelief and Social Change Dan Ariely, Behavioral Economics, Misbelief, Misinformation, Social Media, Conspiracy Theories, Political Affiliation, Psychology, Fake News, Empathy, Cognitive Bias, Trust in Society, Resilience, Stress and Misbelief, Cognitive Dissonance, Shibboleth, Secure Attachment, Dunning-Kruger Effect, Innovation, Identity and Belief, AI and Misinformation Find Dan at www.DanAriely.com
Why do so many of us in the present day belief in conspiracy theories?Looking for a link we mentioned? It's here: https://linktr.ee/philosophyforourtimesJoin professor and psychologist Dan Ariely as he discusses the main tenets of his 2023 book 'Misbelief: What Makes Rational People Believe Irrational Things.' With great sympathy for those, including some of us, who tend to believe various unsubstantiated claims, Ariely assesses their personality traits, the effects on society, and what, if anything, can be done about an increasing tendency for misbelief. There are thousands of big ideas to discover at IAI.tv – videos, articles, and courses waiting for you to explore. Find out more: https://iai.tv/podcast-offers?utm_source=podcast&utm_medium=shownotes&utm_campaign=the-enigma-of-energySee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
SDU Show 87 features well-known data community member Ronen Ariely discussing why he thinks knowledge of SQL Server internals is important
Previously on Pretend, we dived deep into the murky waters of academic fraud. Celebrity behavioral scientist Dan Ariely of Duke University, alongside Francesca Gino from Harvard and other distinguished behavioral scientists, embarked on a series of experiments with a noble aim: to enhance honesty among individuals. Their investigation centered on whether positioning an honesty pledge at the top of a form, as opposed to the bottom, would discourage deceit. However, it emerged that two out of the three experiments underpinning the study were marred by fabricated data. I interviewed Dan Ariely about these troubling allegations, but our conversation was cut short. I assumed that was the last time I would hear from him. Surprisingly, Ariely reached out, proposing a second interview to directly address what he termed as "false accusations" on my podcast. He stipulated, "If you intend to add these false accusations to the podcast, maybe it's best to have another session and get my answers on the record, but I will ask you to promise me not to edit these. And to give my answers exactly as I present them. If you're up for this, let's schedule a sum If you're up for this, let's schedule something." And so, I agreed. You're going to listen to my follow-up interview with Dan Ariely. I will, however, interject here and there to add context. But rest assured, every moment of our 43-minute exchange will be presented. I'll upload the raw, unedited versions of both interviews on Patreon and Pretend Plus, accessible for free. You don't need a subscription to tune in. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Everything we believe about what drives us to be honest might be a lie. A scandal rocks the behavioral science world, casting shadows over renowned researcher Dan Ariely and the integrity of academic research on honesty. We all tell lies—it's a human thing. But can we modify behaviors to coax people into doing the right thing? Let's delve into what the research indicates. After all, facts and numbers don't lie, and academic researchers shouldn't lie either, right? But what happens when these so-called truth experts, the Ivy League researchers who literally wrote the book on dishonesty, are accused of lying and manipulating data? Who fact-checks the truth-tellers? Science stands as our final bastion of objectivity. However, the individuals behind the studies we're discussing are people. And people make mistakes. But what happens when errors are set aside and data is deliberately fabricated to create an illusion of truth? The consequences could be dire, undermining our trust in everything we hear or read. Today's story recaps a major scandal in behavioral science, one that's been spotlighted by The New Yorker, The Atlantic, NPR, and podcasts like Freakonomics and Planet Money. Each outlet brought attention to different aspects of the story, but they all missed one critical voice—Dan Ariely, a professor of psychology and behavioral economics at Duke University. In a rare interview, I confronted Ariely about the studies in question, and to my surprise, he answered all of my questions. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
In this enlightening episode, we delve into the complexities of human decision-making with Professor Dan Ariely, a leading figure in psychology and behavioral economics at Duke University. Through a series of probing questions, we explore the "Funnel of Misbelief" framework, the impact of stress on misbelief, and the influence of social cohesion on our beliefs. Ariely offers insights into the challenges posed by advanced AI in spreading misinformation, and outlines societal measures for rebuilding trust. We also discuss the pivotal role of education and discourse in enhancing critical thinking and resilience against misinformation, drawing from Ariely's extensive research and personal experiences.
Join Andrew Brill as he sits down with behavioral economist Dan Ariely to explore the psychological forces driving our financial decisions. This episode peels back the layers of human irrationality in wealth management, offering a deep dive into how our inherent biases and societal pressures skew our approach to investing, saving, and spending. From the allure of AI investments to the pitfalls of materialism, Ariely provides transformative insights on building resilience in an economy filled with unpredictability. Whether you're looking to refine your investment strategy or simply interested in the behavioral underpinnings of economic trends, this conversation is a must-watch for anyone serious about safeguarding and growing their wealth in today's complex financial landscape. SCHEDULE YOUR FREE PORTFOLIO REVIEW with Wealthion's endorsed financial advisors at https://www.wealthion.com. Timestamps: 01:11 - The Concept of Advanced Hindsight and Financial Predictions 03:02 - Unpredictability in the Stock Market and Economic Theories 05:34 - Irrationality in Financial Decisions: A Behavioral Perspective 12:16 - The Importance of Seeking Financial Advice in Times of Uncertainty 17:28 - Materialism, Happiness, and Financial Choices 22:06 - Behavioral Insights into Federal Reserve Decision-Making 27:49 - The Psychology Behind Stock Investments and Market Trends 31:00 - Understanding FOMO in Financial Markets 36:30 - Behavioral Economics and Housing Market Decisions 40:45 - Emerging Trends in Behavioral Economics and Their Impact on Personal Finance
Chapter 1 What's The Upside of Irrationality Book by Dan Ariely"The Upside of Irrationality" is a book by behavioral economist Dan Ariely that explores why humans often act in irrational ways and the potential benefits of this irrationality. Ariely argues that while irrational behavior can sometimes lead us astray, it can also have positive effects, such as helping us to make more creative decisions and fostering social connections. The book delves into various aspects of human behavior, such as motivation, decision-making, and relationships, and offers insights into how understanding our irrational tendencies can lead to personal and professional growth.Chapter 2 Is The Upside of Irrationality Book A Good BookDan Ariely's book "The Upside of Irrationality" has received positive reviews from readers and critics alike. It offers insights into human behavior and decision-making, discussing how our irrational tendencies can both hinder and benefit us. The book is well-written, engaging, and thought-provoking, making it a good choice for anyone interested in psychology, economics, and self-improvement. Overall, "The Upside of Irrationality" is considered a good book worth reading.Chapter 3 The Upside of Irrationality Book by Dan Ariely Summary"The Upside of Irrationality: The Unexpected Benefits of Defying Logic at Work and at Home" is a book by Dan Ariely that explores how irrational behavior can actually have positive outcomes in various aspects of our lives. Ariely, a professor of psychology and behavioral economics, presents research and real-life examples to illustrate how irrationality can lead to creativity, innovation, and better decision-making.One key point in the book is the idea that embracing our irrational behaviors can lead to greater happiness and fulfillment. Ariely argues that by understanding and accepting our flaws and biases, we can make better choices and improve our overall well-being.Another important concept in the book is the idea that irrationality can drive innovation and creativity. Ariely presents examples of how thinking outside the box and taking risks can lead to breakthrough ideas and solutions that may not have been possible through rational thinking alone.Overall, "The Upside of Irrationality" challenges traditional views of logic and rationality, suggesting that there are unexpected benefits to embracing our irrational tendencies. It encourages readers to embrace their imperfections and biases, and to use them as tools for personal growth and success. Chapter 4 The Upside of Irrationality Book AuthorDan Ariely is a professor of psychology and behavioral economics at Duke University. He is also the founder of The Center for Advanced Hindsight and co-founder of BEworks, a business and behavioral economics consultancy."The Upside of Irrationality" was released in 2010. It is a sequel to Ariely's previous book, "Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions," which was published in 2008 and became a New York Times bestseller.Some of Ariely's other books include "The Honest Truth About Dishonesty: How We Lie to Everyone - Especially Ourselves" (2012), "Dollars and Sense: How We Misthink Money and How to Spend Smarter" (2017), and "Payoff: The Hidden Logic That Shapes Our Motivations" (2016).In terms of editions and popularity, "Predictably Irrational" is generally considered Ariely's most successful book, having been translated into over 30 languages and sold over one million copies worldwide.Chapter 5 The Upside of Irrationality Book Meaning...
Hello Pole dancer and welcome to a new episode of The Evidence Based Pole Podcast, brought to you by Slink Through Strength with Rosy Boa. Today we are discussing how to make exercise enjoyable and the motivations to move. Lots of disciplines have looked at this; Panteleimon Ekkekakis at Iowa State is one of the main researchers working on this topic & developed the Affective-Reflective Theory of Exercise w/ Ralf Brand) One of the ways to keep the motivation up are to keep the intensity a bit lower. Medium intensity is more pleasurable than high intensity exercise, especially for folks who aren't already exercising often. If you are going for more intensity, don't go too long without a break OR decrease intensity over time. Research shows for men who weren't already very active, pleasure in exercise dropped off quickly the longer they did a high-intensity exercise and the ended up disliking it. Decreasing (rather than increasing) load over the period of exercise was waaaay more pleasure for participants--even though the total resistance was the same (put your hard tricks at the front!) Another form of motivation to exercise is through developing Self-efficacy. This means believing that you can achieve your goals/desires is especially important at lower intensities. For me as a teacher: making sure that there are interesting and fun options for different capacities and abilities. A huge factor in motivation is to exercise to music you enjoy! Slink Through Strength Email Sign Up: http://eepurl.com/iimjnX Join pole instructor & personal trainer Rosy Boa as she chats with experts about the evidence-based practices you can introduce to your pole journey to improve your pole journey and feel better. The Evidence-Based Pole Podcast aims to help pole dancers feel better on and off the pole by talking with experts and diving into relevant scientific research to find evidence-based insights we can apply to our pole journeys. It's a production of Slink Through Strength, the inclusive, evidence-based online pole studio, which can be found online at slinkthroughstrength.com. Edited by: Simone Rossette Simone.rossette77@gmail.com Sources: Stults-Kolehmainen, M. A., Blacutt, M., Bartholomew, J. B., Gilson, T. A., Ash, G. I., McKee, P. C., & Sinha, R. (2020). Motivation states for physical activity and sedentary behavior: desire, urge, wanting, and craving. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 568390. Decker, E. S., & Ekkekakis, P. (2017). More efficient, perhaps, but at what price? Pleasure and enjoyment responses to high-intensity interval exercise in low-active women with obesity. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 28, 1-10. Frazão DT, de Farias Junior LF, Dantas TCB, Krinski K, Elsangedy HM, et al. (2016) Correction: Feeling of Pleasure to High-Intensity Interval Exercise Is Dependent of the Number of Work Bouts and Physical Activity Status. PLOS ONE 11(4): e0153986. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153986 View correction Hutchinson, Jasmin C., et al. "Increasing the pleasure and enjoyment of exercise: a novel resistance-training protocol." Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology 42.2 (2020): 143-152. Zenko, Z., Ekkekakis, P., & Ariely, D. (2016). Can you have your vigorous exercise and enjoy it too? Ramping intensity down increases postexercise, remembered, and forecasted pleasure. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 38(2), 149-159. Ekkekakis, P. (2003). Pleasure and displeasure from the body: Perspectives from exercise. Cognition and emotion, 17(2), 213-239. Hutchinson, J. C., Jones, L., Vitti, S. N., Moore, A., Dalton, P. C., & O'Neil, B. J. (2018). The influence of self-selected music on affect-regulated exercise intensity and remembered pleasure during treadmill running. Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology, 7(1), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1037/spy0000115 --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/rosy-boa/support
Nghe trọn sách nói Lẽ Phải Của Phi Lý Trí trên ứng dụng Fonos: https://fonos.link/podcast-tvsn --Về Fonos:Fonos là Ứng dụng âm thanh số - Với hơn 13.000 nội dung gồm Sách nói có bản quyền, Podcast, Ebook, Tóm tắt sách, Thiền định, Truyện ngủ, Nhạc chủ đề, Truyện thiếu nhi. Bạn có thể nghe miễn phí chương 1 của tất cả sách nói trên Fonos. Tải app để trải nghiệm ngay!--Lẽ Phải Của Phi Lý Trí là sách nói tư duy được xây dựng và phát triển trên nền tảng sách Phi Lý Trí của nhà khoa học xã hội Dan Ariely. Nếu như trong Phi Lý Trí, Dan Ariely đã đưa ra những ảnh hưởng đa chiều dẫn tới việc con người đưa ra những quyết định thiếu khôn ngoan thì giờ đây trong Lẽ Phải Của Phi Lý Trí, ông hé lộ những ảnh hưởng đầy bất ngờ, cả tích cực lẫn tiêu cực, mà ‘phi lý trí' có thể tác động đến cuộc sống của chúng ta. Tập trung vào nghiên cứu những hành vi của chúng ta tại nơi làm việc và các mối quan hệ của chúng ta, ông đưa ra những hiểu biết mới và những sự thật đáng ngạc nhiên về những điều đang thôi thúc chúng ta làm việc, cách thức mà một hành động thiếu khôn ngoan có thể trở thành một thói quen, cách mà chúng ta học để yêu thương những người mà chúng ta sống cùng, và còn nhiều hơn thế nữa.Lẽ Phải Của Phi Lý Trí không phải là một cuốn sách hàn lâm khô khan chỉ toàn lý thuyết, mà nó được sử dụng dữ liệu từ những thí nghiệm thú vị và độc đáo dẫn đến những kết luận hấp dẫn về cách thức – và nguyên nhân tại sao chúng ta hành động như vậy. Từ những thái độ tại nơi làm việc của chúng ta, cho tới những mối quan hệ lãng mạn, tới việc chúng ta luôn tìm kiếm mục đích cuộc đời mình, Ariely lý giải cách thức phá vỡ những khuôn mẫu bi quan trong suy nghĩ và hành vi của chúng ta để đưa ra những quyết định tốt hơn. Cuốn sách kỹ năng này sẽ thay đổi cách thức chúng ta nhận thức bản thân trong công việc và trong gia đình – và soi xét các hành vi phi lý trí của chúng ta dưới một thứ sắc thái ánh sáng hoàn toàn mới mẻ.--Tìm hiểu thêm về Fonos: https://fonos.vn/Theo dõi Facebook Fonos: https://www.facebook.com/fonosvietnam/
Embark on a transformative journey with our esteemed guest, Dan Ariely, renowned professor and behavioural economist, as he fearlessly navigates disbelief, death threats, and profound challenges. In this riveting episode, Ariely shares insights on resilience, not merely as bouncing back, but as the art of walking through life. Drawing inspiration from luminaries, he reflects on finding ways to dance between life's raindrops, steering through adversity. From overcoming severe burns to contemplating the essence of a good end, Ariely touches on generosity, fairness, and enduring the human spirit. Ariely's shared insights offer hope for positive change, making this episode an unmissable exploration of transformative resilience.
We continue our series on belief…by looking at misbelief. We're back with our expert, Dan are-ee-elly, to see what drives him. And we'll give special attention to the beliefs that drive him. Dan again is an Israeli-American professor and author who serves as a James B. Duke Professor of psychology and behavioral economics at Duke University. Ariely is the co-founder of several companies implementing insights from behavioral science. His latest book, and our muse for this series is MISBELIEF: WHAT MAKES RATIONAL PEOPLE BELIEVE IRRATIONAL THINGS. You can watch this full episodes on YouTube - just search for “What Drives You with Kevin Miller” What Drives You is brought to you by Ziglar, your premier source for equipping Life and Leadership coaches. Visit Ziglar.com and let them inspire your true coaching performance. *This podcast is rated clean but the subject matter is adult themed and may not be suitable or relevant for children or those with fragile belief systems. Head to airdoctorpro.com and use promo code KEVIN and depending on the model receive UP TO 39% off or UP TO $300 off! Sign up today at butcherbox.com/selfhelpful and use code selfhelpful to get free chicken wings for a year. Sign up for a one-dollar-per-month trial period at shopify.com/kevin. Head to factormeals.com/whatdrivesyou50 and use code whatdrivesyou50 to get 50% off. Go to ShipStation.com and use code KEVIN today and sign up for your FREE 60-day trial. Visit Audible.com/whatdrivesyou or text whatdrivesyou to 500-500. Go to HelloFresh.com/drivefree and use code drivefree for FREE breakfast for life! Go to Seed.com/WHAT and use code WHAT to get 25% off your first month. Go to AquaTru.com and use code “KEVIN” to receive 20% OFF any AquaTru purifier! Visit BetterHelp.com/WHATDRIVESYOU today to get 10% off your first month Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
You've heard me talk often as of late about what I've grown to believe are the dangers of our individual and cultural beliefs. We all want to know what is and what is not and be able to count on it. That's human nature. But the more I've learned in my lifetime, the more of my past beliefs I no longer believe. I just assume then, that many of my current beliefs, I may also change as I continue to learn more. So then what value are beliefs? And how much trust do we put in our beliefs? This is a controversial topic, as we want to believe, our beliefs, are truth and fact. But…they are not. If you can't accept that, either run from this episode, or take a deep breath and open yourself to…freedom. Our guide for this series is Dan Arielly. Dan is an Israeli-American professor and author. He serves as a James B. Duke Professor of psychology and behavioral economics at Duke University. Ariely is the co-founder of several companies implementing insights from behavioral science. His latest book, and our muse for this conversation, is MISBELIEF: WHAT MAKES RATIONAL PEOPLE BELIEVE IRRATIONAL THINGS. You can watch this full episodes on YouTube - just search for “What Drives You with Kevin Miller” What Drives You is brought to you by Ziglar, your premier source for equipping Life and Leadership coaches. Visit Ziglar.com and let them inspire your true coaching performance. *This podcast is rated clean but the subject matter is adult themed and may not be suitable or relevant for children or those with fragile belief systems. Head to airdoctorpro.com and use promo code KEVIN and depending on the model receive UP TO 39% off or UP TO $300 off! Sign up today at butcherbox.com/selfhelpful and use code selfhelpful to get free chicken wings for a year. Sign up for a one-dollar-per-month trial period at shopify.com/kevin. Head to factormeals.com/whatdrivesyou50 and use code whatdrivesyou50 to get 50% off. Go to ShipStation.com and use code KEVIN today and sign up for your FREE 60-day trial. Visit Audible.com/whatdrivesyou or text whatdrivesyou to 500-500. Go to HelloFresh.com/drivefree and use code drivefree for FREE breakfast for life! Go to Seed.com/WHAT and use code WHAT to get 25% off your first month. Go to AquaTru.com and use code “KEVIN” to receive 20% OFF any AquaTru purifier! Visit BetterHelp.com/WHATDRIVESYOU today to get 10% off your first month Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
The Brainy Business | Understanding the Psychology of Why People Buy | Behavioral Economics
In this episode of The Brainy Business Podcast, you'll discover host Melina Palmer's favorite brainy books and why they're worth checking out. Melina begins by sharing how many listeners have reached out to her, thanking her for the book recommendations that have expanded their knowledge and understanding. She explains that as a behavioral economics enthusiast, she has the privilege of reading books before they hit the shelves and even getting to speak with the authors. Melina kicks off the episode by introducing her new series where she'll recommend books based on specific topics. She emphasizes the importance of understanding what you want to achieve with the information before diving into her book recommendations. In this episode, you will: Discover the fascinating world of behavioral economics and how it influences our decision-making processes. Gain valuable insights into the foundations of behavioral economics and how it can be applied to different areas of life. Learn about the power of nudges and choice architecture in shaping our behavior and decision-making. Explore the intersection of neuroscience, marketing, and branding to understand how our brains respond to promotional messages. Discover effective strategies for increasing productivity and minimizing distractions in an increasingly distracting world. Show Notes: 00:00:00 - Introduction, Melina introduces the episode and mentions how she often gets asked for book recommendations. She also mentions that this episode is the first in a series of book recommendations and asks for feedback from listeners. 00:03:00 - Daniel Kahneman's Thinking, Fast and Slow, Melina recommends Daniel Kahneman's Thinking, Fast and Slow as a foundational book in the field of behavioral economics. She describes it as a comprehensive guide to understanding behavioral science and highlights its importance for anyone interested in the field. 00:06:30 - Richard Thaler and Cass Sunstein's Nudge, Melina recommends Richard Thaler and Cass Sunstein's book Nudge as another foundational book in behavioral economics. She explains that it provides a great foundation in the concept of nudges and choice architecture, and shares examples related to money, health, and freedom. 00:09:42 - Dan Ariely's Predictably Irrational, Melina recommends Dan Ariely's Predictably Irrational as an introductory book to behavioral economics. She praises Ariely's conversational tone and relatable storytelling, making it an easy and enjoyable read for those interested in understanding the hidden forces that shape our decisions. 00:11:28 - A. K. Pradeep's The Buying Brain, Melina recommends A. K. Pradeep's "The Buying Brain" for those interested in consumer mindset, marketing strategy, and applying behavioral insights. 00:16:09 - Overview of Indistractable Book, Melina provides an overview of the book Indistractable and highlights its importance in understanding motivation, triggers, and focus. She explores tips for preventing distractions, making workplaces and relationships indistractable, and offers practical advice for hacking back external triggers. 00:16:51 - Hacking Back External Triggers, Part three of the book is discussed, focusing on hacking back external triggers such as notifications and interruptions. The chapter provides specific tips for managing work interruptions, email, group chat, meetings, smartphones, and online distractions. The information is actionable and easy to implement. 00:17:27 - Reducing Notifications, Melina shares personal experience of using the author's tips to reduce notifications, resulting in increased productivity. Removing push notifications for social media and email, except for text messages and phone calls, has made a significant difference. The book offers insights into understanding the brain and facilitates making behavioral shifts. 00:18:21 - Understanding Distraction and Traction, The section emphasizes the core insight of the book: distraction is the opposite of traction. It highlights the importance of identifying what distractions are pulling us away from and finding our traction. The book provides guidance on staying focused on what truly matters. 00:19:20 - Conclusion, Melina's top insights from the conversation. What stuck with you while listening to the episode? What are you going to try? Come share it with Melina on social media -- you'll find her as @thebrainybiz everywhere and as Melina Palmer on LinkedIn. Thanks for listening. Don't forget to subscribe on Apple Podcasts or Android. If you like what you heard, please leave a review on iTunes and share what you liked about the show. I hope you love everything recommended via The Brainy Business! Everything was independently reviewed and selected by me, Melina Palmer. So you know, as an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. That means if you decide to shop from the links on this page (via Amazon or others), The Brainy Business may collect a share of sales or other compensation. Let's connect: Melina@TheBrainyBusiness.com The Brainy Business® on Facebook The Brainy Business on Twitter The Brainy Business on Instagram The Brainy Business on LinkedIn Melina on LinkedIn The Brainy Business on Youtube Learn and Support The Brainy Business: Check out and get your copies of Melina's Books. Get the Books Mentioned on (or related to) this Episode: Thinking Fast and Slow, by Daniel Kahneman Nudge, by Richard Thaler and Cass Sunstein The Buying Brain, by AK Padreep Friction, by Roger Dooley Indistractable, by Nir Eyal Top Recommended Next Episode: Nir Eyal (ep 290) Already Heard That One? Try These: Dan Ariely (ep 101) NUDGES & Choice Architecture (ep 35) Incentives – The “N” In NUDGES (ep 272) Understanding Mapping: The “U” in NUDGES (ep 37) Defaults: The “D” in NUDGES (ep 38) Expect Error: The “E” in NUDGES (ep 39) Give Feedback: The “G” in NUDGES (ep 40) Sense of Sight (ep 24) Sense Of Smell (ep 298) Why You Actually Taste With Your Nose – On The Sense Of Taste (ep 26) Did You Hear That? – On The Sense of Hearing (ep 300) Power Of Touch (ep 302) Roger Dooley (ep 274) Nir Eyal (ep 290) Understanding the Problem (ep 126) Other Important Links: Brainy Bites - Melina's LinkedIn Newsletter 3 Ways You Can Limit Everyday Distractions, by Melina Palmer
Davranışsal ekonomi balonunu şişirdik şişirdik, artık indiriyoruz. Çeşit çeşit sahtekarlıktan oluşan bir dedektiflik hikayesi oldu. İki başrol oyuncumuz var, ben de finali iki kısma ayırdım: Bugünkü kısım Dan Ariely'nin dürüstlük çalışmalarına odaklı. Aynı zamanda tekrarlanabilirlik krizi üstünden bilimin nasıl düşe kalka ilerlediğini de göreceğiz. Tüm kaynaklar aşağıda her zamanki gibi, patronlarıma patroniçelerime teşekkürler..Konular:(00:05) Davranışsal Balon(02:05) Önceki bölümlerin özeti(04:20) Dan Ariely(06:41) 10 Emir çalışması(08:13) Tekrarlanabilirlik Krizi(11:57) p-hacking(15:50) Deri rengi ve kırmızı kartlar(17:28) Many Labs(19:15) Ariely'nin 10 Emir çalışmasının tekrarı(21:26) Patreon Teşekkürleri.Kaynaklar:Makale (pdf): The Dishonesty of Honest People (2008)Yazı: The Mind of a Con Man (Diederik Stapel hakkında)Video: The scientist who faked over 50 studiesMakale: The Reproducibility Project: Psychology (2015)Brian Nosek ve Many LabsVideo: The Fall of a Superstar PsychologistYazı: The replication crisis has engulfed economicsMakale: 10 Emir çalışmasının tekrarı.------- Podbee Sunar -------Bu podcast, Cambly hakkında reklam içerir.Cambly'de yılın en büyük indirimi %60'dan fular60 koduyla faydalanmak için tıklayınız.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Tickets for our December event available now: https://skeptic.com/event Shermer and Ariely discuss: What is disinformation and what should we do about it? • How do we know what is true and what to believe? • virtue signaling one's tribe as a misbelief factor • the role of complex stories in misbelief • emotions, personality, temperament, trust, politics, and social aspects of belief and misbelief • the funnel of belief • social proof and the influence of others on our beliefs • a COVID-23 pandemic • social media companies responsibility for disinformation • What would it take to change your mind? Dan Ariely is the bestselling author of Predictably Irrational, The Upside of Irrationality, and The (Honest) Truth About Dishonesty. He is the James B. Duke Professor of Psychology and Behavioral Economics at Duke University and is the founder of the Center for Advanced Hindsight. His work has been featured in the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, the Washington Post, the Boston Globe, and elsewhere.
Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: Linkpost: A Post Mortem on the Gino Case, published by Linch on October 24, 2023 on LessWrong. As a followup to my previous linkpost to the New Yorker article covering the Ariely and Gino scandals, I'm linking this statement by Zoe Ziani, the grad student who first discovered inconsistencies in Gino's papers. Here she gives a blow-by-blow retelling of her experience attempting to uncover fraud, as well as telling a fairly harrowing story about how higher-ups in her organization attempted to silence her. I find this story instructive both on the object-level, and as a case study both for a) how informal corrupt channels tries to cover up fraud and corruption, and b) for how active participation is needed to make the long arc of history bend towards truth. In her own words: ____ Disclaimer: None of the opinions expressed in this letter should be construed as statements of fact. They only reflect my experience with the research process, and my opinion regarding Francesca Gino's work. I am also not claiming that Francesca Gino committed fraud: Only that there is overwhelming evidence of data fabrication in multiple papers for which she was responsible for the data. On September 30th, 2023, the New Yorker published a long piece on "L'affaire Ariely/Gino" , and the role I played in it. I am grateful for the messages of support I received over the past few weeks. In this post, I wanted to share more about how I came to discover the anomalies in Francesca Gino's work, and what I think we can learn from this unfortunate story. What is The Story? How it all began I started having doubts about one of Francesca Gino's paper ( Casciaro, Gino, and Kouchaki, "The Contaminating Effect of Building Instrumental Ties: How Networking Can Make Us Feel Dirty", ASQ, 2014 ; hereafter abbreviated as "CGK 2014" ) during my PhD. At the time, I was working on the topic of networking behaviors, and this paper is a cornerstone of the literature. I formed the opinion that I shouldn't use this paper as a building block in my research. Indeed, the idea that people would feel "physically dirty" when networking did not seem very plausible, and I knew that many results in Management and Psychology published around this time had been obtained through researchers' degrees of freedom. However, my advisor had a different view: The paper had been published in a top management journal by three prominent scholars… To her, it was inconceivable to simply disregard this paper. I felt trapped: She kept insisting, for more than a year, that I had to build upon the paper… but I had serious doubts about the trustworthiness of the results. I didn't suspect fraud: I simply thought that the results had been "cherry picked". At the end of my third year into the program (i.e., in 2018), I finally decided to openly share with her my concerns about the paper. I also insisted that given how little we knew about networking discomfort, and given my doubts about the soundness of CGK 2014, it would be better to start from scratch and launch an exploratory study on the topic. Her reaction was to vehemently dismiss my concerns, and to imply that I was making very serious accusations. I was stunned: Either she was unaware of the "replication crisis" in psychology (showing how easy it is to obtain false-positive results from questionable research practices), or she was aware of it but decided to ignore it. In both cases, it was a clear signal that it was time for me to distance myself from this supervisor. I kept digging into the paper, and arrived at three conclusions: The paper presents serious methodological and theoretical issues, the most severe being that it is based on a psychological mechanism (the "Macbeth Effect") that has repeatedly failed to replicate. The strength of evidence against the null presented in study 1 of th...
Link to original articleWelcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: Linkpost: A Post Mortem on the Gino Case, published by Linch on October 24, 2023 on LessWrong. As a followup to my previous linkpost to the New Yorker article covering the Ariely and Gino scandals, I'm linking this statement by Zoe Ziani, the grad student who first discovered inconsistencies in Gino's papers. Here she gives a blow-by-blow retelling of her experience attempting to uncover fraud, as well as telling a fairly harrowing story about how higher-ups in her organization attempted to silence her. I find this story instructive both on the object-level, and as a case study both for a) how informal corrupt channels tries to cover up fraud and corruption, and b) for how active participation is needed to make the long arc of history bend towards truth. In her own words: ____ Disclaimer: None of the opinions expressed in this letter should be construed as statements of fact. They only reflect my experience with the research process, and my opinion regarding Francesca Gino's work. I am also not claiming that Francesca Gino committed fraud: Only that there is overwhelming evidence of data fabrication in multiple papers for which she was responsible for the data. On September 30th, 2023, the New Yorker published a long piece on "L'affaire Ariely/Gino" , and the role I played in it. I am grateful for the messages of support I received over the past few weeks. In this post, I wanted to share more about how I came to discover the anomalies in Francesca Gino's work, and what I think we can learn from this unfortunate story. What is The Story? How it all began I started having doubts about one of Francesca Gino's paper ( Casciaro, Gino, and Kouchaki, "The Contaminating Effect of Building Instrumental Ties: How Networking Can Make Us Feel Dirty", ASQ, 2014 ; hereafter abbreviated as "CGK 2014" ) during my PhD. At the time, I was working on the topic of networking behaviors, and this paper is a cornerstone of the literature. I formed the opinion that I shouldn't use this paper as a building block in my research. Indeed, the idea that people would feel "physically dirty" when networking did not seem very plausible, and I knew that many results in Management and Psychology published around this time had been obtained through researchers' degrees of freedom. However, my advisor had a different view: The paper had been published in a top management journal by three prominent scholars… To her, it was inconceivable to simply disregard this paper. I felt trapped: She kept insisting, for more than a year, that I had to build upon the paper… but I had serious doubts about the trustworthiness of the results. I didn't suspect fraud: I simply thought that the results had been "cherry picked". At the end of my third year into the program (i.e., in 2018), I finally decided to openly share with her my concerns about the paper. I also insisted that given how little we knew about networking discomfort, and given my doubts about the soundness of CGK 2014, it would be better to start from scratch and launch an exploratory study on the topic. Her reaction was to vehemently dismiss my concerns, and to imply that I was making very serious accusations. I was stunned: Either she was unaware of the "replication crisis" in psychology (showing how easy it is to obtain false-positive results from questionable research practices), or she was aware of it but decided to ignore it. In both cases, it was a clear signal that it was time for me to distance myself from this supervisor. I kept digging into the paper, and arrived at three conclusions: The paper presents serious methodological and theoretical issues, the most severe being that it is based on a psychological mechanism (the "Macbeth Effect") that has repeatedly failed to replicate. The strength of evidence against the null presented in study 1 of th...
Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: Linkpost: They Studied Dishonesty. Was Their Work a Lie?, published by Linch on October 2, 2023 on LessWrong. This is a linkpost for Gideon Lewis-Kraus's New Yorker article on the (alleged) Ariely and Gino data fraud scandals. I've been following this situation off-and-on for a while (and even more so after the original datacolada blog posts). The basic story is that multiple famous professors in social psychology (specializing in dishonesty) have been caught with blatant data fraud. The field to a large extent tried to "protect their own," but in the end the evidence became too strong. The suspects have since retreated to attempting to sue datacolada (the investigators). Despite the tragic nature of the story, I consider this material hilarious high entertainment, in addition to being quite educational. The writing is also quite good, as I've come to expect from Gideon Lewis-Kraus (who locals might have heard of from his in-depth profiles on Slate Star Codex, Will MacAskill, and the FTX crash). Some quotes: If you tortured the data long enough, as one grim joke went, it would confess to anything. They called such techniques "p-hacking." As they later put it, "Everyone knew it was wrong, but they thought it was wrong the way it's wrong to jaywalk." In fact, they wrote, "it was wrong the way it's wrong to rob a bank." Ziani [a young grad student] found Gino's results implausible, and assumed that they had been heavily p-hacked. She told me, "This crowd is used to living in a world where you have enough degrees of freedom to do whatever you want and all that matters is that it works beautifully." But an adviser strongly suggested that Ziani "build on" the paper, which had appeared in a top journal. When she expressed her doubts, the adviser snapped at her, "Don't ever say that!" Members of Ziani's dissertation committee couldn't understand why this nobody of a student was being so truculent. In the end, two of them refused to sign off on her degree if she did not remove criticisms of Gino's paper from her dissertation. One warned Ziani not to second-guess a professor of Gino's stature in this way. In an e-mail, the adviser wrote, "Academic research is like a conversation at a cocktail party. You are storming in, shouting 'You suck!' " A former senior researcher at the lab told me, "He assured us that the effect was there, that this was a true thing, and I was convinced he completely believed it." The former senior researcher said, "How do you swim through that murky area of where is he lying? Where is he stretching the truth? What is he forgetting or misremembering? Because he does all three of those things very consistently. So when it really matters - like with the auto insurance - which of these three things is it?" (Meme made by myself) Thanks for listening. To help us out with The Nonlinear Library or to learn more, please visit nonlinear.org
Chapter 1 What's Predictably Irrational"Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions" is a book written by Dan Ariely, a behavioral economist and professor at Duke University. It explores the irrational aspects of human decision-making and behavior, challenging the traditional assumption of human rationality. The book delves into various topics, such as the influence of emotions, social norms, and cognitive biases on our choices. Through engaging anecdotes and experiments, Ariely presents a new perspective on why we often make choices that go against our best interests and provides insights into how we can make better decisions in our personal and professional lives.Chapter 2 Why is Predictably Irrational Worth ReadThere are several reasons why "Predictably Irrational" by Dan Ariely is worth reading:1. Insight into human behavior: The book provides valuable insights into the hidden forces that shape human behavior and decision-making. It explores how human beings often act irrationally, contrary to traditional economic theories, and helps readers understand why people make the choices they do.2. Practical applications: Ariely's research findings have practical applications in various fields, including marketing, business, public policy, and personal development. Readers can learn how to recognize and overcome their own irrational behaviors, as well as understand and influence the behavior of others.3. Engaging storytelling: Ariely presents his research and ideas through engaging and relatable anecdotes, making the book easy to read and understand. He uses real-life examples to illustrate the concepts, making it interesting and relatable for readers.4. Thought-provoking content: "Predictably Irrational" challenges conventional wisdom and prompts readers to question their own assumptions about human behavior and decision-making. It encourages critical thinking and opens up new perspectives on how we understand and interact with the world.5. Relevant and timely: The book's exploration of irrational behavior is highly relevant in today's consumer-driven society, where individuals are constantly bombarded with choices, advertisements, and persuasive techniques. Understanding the underlying reasons behind our decisions can help individuals make more informed choices and resist manipulation.In summary, "Predictably Irrational" offers unique insights, practical applications, engaging narratives, thought-provoking content, and timely relevance, making it a valuable read for anyone interested in understanding human behavior and decision-making.Chapter 3 Predictably Irrational SummaryPredictably Irrational by Dan Ariely is a book that explores the various ways humans make irrational decisions and behave in unpredictable ways when it comes to economics, psychology, and our everyday lives.Ariely challenges the traditional economic theory that assumes people always act in a rational and self-interested manner. He argues that our decisions are often influenced by emotions, social norms, and unconscious biases. Through a series of experiments and real-life examples, he demonstrates how these irrational behaviors can have significant implications for our personal lives and the economy as a whole.The book covers a wide range of topics, including the concept of relativity and how our choices are influenced by the options presented to us. It also delves into the impact of emotions on decision-making, and how our desire for social approval can lead us to make irrational choices. Ariely also examines the role of money and its effect on motivation, showing how monetary incentives can sometimes backfire and lead to worse outcomes.Additionally, Ariely...
Can you lie, cheat, and steal and still be a good person? Behavioral economist Dan Ariely says we all do it. Thing is, we almost all do it just a little, not enough to ruin our self-image of being a good, honest person. In this 2012 interview Ariely explains the science behind our misbehaviors. Get The (Honest) Truth About Dishonesty by Dan Ariely You may also enjoy my interviews with Neil de Greasse Tyson and Rev. Jim Bakker For more vintage interviews with celebrities, leaders, and influencers, subscribe to Now I've Heard Everything on Spotify, Apple Podcasts. or wherever you listen to podcasts. Photo by Yael Zur for Tel Aviv University Alumni Organization #honesty #cheating #stealing #psychology
https://youtu.be/ef-EDYwNbKk Every flaw that people point out in consumer choice is present, but much worse, in political choice! - Asymmetric information about quality (where producers have more knowledge about the product than consumers)? Check. Consumers can look at ratings or Consumer Reports to learn about product quality. But it's very difficult to know when a politician is lying (unless you buy the old line that it's when her lips are moving). - Monopoly? Check. Yes, the cable company is pretty bad. But the state is the very definition of monopoly. Your only escape is to move… to some other monopoly. There is never competition, and the bureaucrats down at the Department of Motor Vehicles know that. That's why they treat you so badly. - Seductive and misleading advertising? Check. Maybe I do buy those new Nike kicks because they promise to make me like Mike, and maybe that Twix bar by the checkout counter is too tempting to resist. But at least I like Twix! Politicians “place” themselves in ads all over the place, like photo bombers from hell, and how often do we really get what we're promised? - Seduced by free stuff? Check. Ariely notes, rightly, that people will often (irrationally) choose the free alternative, and will fail to understand the other costs of free stuff, like waiting in line or filling out paperwork. Frankly, that sounds to me like a pretty good description of government programs ranging from our new healthcare system (“It's all free!”) to recycling programs, which conserve on everything except time, which is the one resource that is truly non-renewable. I've seen people waste 10 minutes and 50 cents worth of gas to recycle two plastic soft drink bottles and a cardboard box worth a total of a nickel. But since recycling gives us free resources, it must be worth it! - Michael Munger, Every Flaw in Consumers is Worse in Voters: Markets Aren't Perfect, But Politics is Worse Watch on BitChute
Dan Ariely and Francesca Gino are two of the biggest stars in behavioral science. Both have conducted blockbuster research into how to make people more honest, research we've highlighted on Planet Money. The two worked together on a paper about how to "nudge" people to be more honest on things like forms or tax returns. Their trick: move the location where people attest that they have filled in a form honestly from the bottom of the form to the top.But recently, questions have arisen about whether the data Ariely and Gino relied on in their famous paper about honesty were fabricated — whether their research into honesty was itself built on lies. The blog Data Colada went looking for clues in the cells of the studies' Excel spreadsheets, the shapes of their data distributions, and even the fonts that were used. The Hartford, an insurance company that collaborated with Ariely on one implicated study, told NPR this week in a statement that it could confirm that the data it had provided for that study had been altered prior to the research's publication: "It is clear the data was manipulated inappropriately and supplemented by synthesized or fabricated data." Ariely denies that he was responsible for the falsified data. "Getting the data file was the extent of my involvement with the data," he told NPR. Help support Planet Money and get bonus episodes by subscribing to Planet Money+ in Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org/planetmoney.
Welcome to the Social-Engineer Podcast: The Doctor Is In Series - where we will discuss understandings and developments in the field of psychology. In today's episode, Chris and Abbie are discussing: The Illusion of Rational Thought. We will discuss the positives and negatives of rational decision making, as well as the role our emotions play in our decision making processes. [March 6, 2023] 00:00 - Intro 00:22 - Dr. Abbie Maroño Intro 01:21 - Intro Links - Tuxcare – tuxcare.com - Social-Engineer.com - http://www.social-engineer.com/ - Managed Voice Phishing - https://www.social-engineer.com/services/vishing-service/ - Managed Email Phishing - https://www.social-engineer.com/services/se-phishing-service/ - Adversarial Simulations - https://www.social-engineer.com/services/social-engineering-penetration-test/ - Social-Engineer channel on SLACK - https://social-engineering-hq.slack.com/ssb - CLUTCH - http://www.pro-rock.com/ - innocentlivesfoundation.org - http://www.innocentlivesfoundation.org/ 06:00 - The Topic of the Day: The Illusion of Rational Thinking 08:18 - The Difference "Framing" Makes 12:53 - Why "FREE" Isn't Free 17:49 - Western Influence 20:02 - Having More, Feeling Less 22:00 - Analysis Paralysis 28:33 - Embodied Cognition 30:21 - You're Getting Warmer 33:59 - Excitation Transfer Theory 35:13 - Let the Countdown Begin 39:02 - Emotional Responses 42:31 - Incidental Emotions 45:45 - Wrap Up - www.social-engineer.com - www.innocentlivesfoundation.org 48:01 - Outro Find us online: - Twitter: https://twitter.com/abbiejmarono - LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/dr-abbie-maroño-phd-35ab2611a - Twitter: https://twitter.com/humanhacker - LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/christopherhadnagy References: Mano, H. (1990). Emotional states and decision making. ACR North American Advances. DellaVigna, S. (2009). Psychology and economics: Evidence from the field. Journal of Economic literature, 47(2), 315-372. Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of general psychology, 2(2), 175-220. Klein, N. H., & Oglethorpe, J. E. (1987). Cognitive reference points in consumer decision making. ACR North American Advances. Koop, G. J., & Johnson, J. G. (2012). The use of multiple reference points in risky decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 25(1), 49-62. Seiler, M. J., Seiler, V. L., & Lane, M. A. (2012). Mental accounting and false reference points in real estate investment decision making. Journal of Behavioral finance, 13(1), 17-26. Bottom, W. P., & Studt, A. (1993). Framing effects and the distributive aspects of integrative bargaining. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 56, 459–474 So, J., Achar, C., Han, D., Agrawal, N., Duhachek, A., & Maheswaran, D. (2015). The psychology of appraisal: Specific emotions and decision-making. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25(3), 359-371. Kristensen, H., & Ga¨ rling, T. (1997). Anchor points, reference points, and counteroffers in negotiations. Manuscript submitted for publication. Neale, M. A., Huber, V. L., & Northcraft, G. B. (1987). The framing of negotiations: Contextual versus task frames. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39, 228–241 Broniarczyk, Susan M., Hoyer, Wayne D., & McAlister, Leigh (1998). Consumers' perceptions of the assortment offered in a grocery category: The impact of item reduction. Journal of Marketing Research, 35(May), 166–176. Carpenter, Gregory S., & Nakamoto, Kent (1989). Consumer preference formation and pioneering advantage. Journal of Marketing Research, 26(August), 285–298 Andrade, E. B., & Ariely, D. (2009). The enduring impact of transient emotions on decision making. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 109(1), 1-8. Foglia, L., & Wilson, R. A. (2013). Embodied cognition. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 4(3), 319-325. Wilson, A. D., & Golonka, S. (2013). Embodied cognition is not what you think it is. Frontiers in psychology, 4, 58. Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 9, 625-636. Inagaki, T. K., & Eisenberger, N. I. (2013). Shared neural mechanisms underlying social warmth and physical warmth. Psychological science, 24(11), 2272-2280.
¿Por qué lanzar un fondo con asignación táctica? ¿Por qué producir un podcast sobre finanzas personales? Ambas preguntas atacan un mismo problema y tanto Javier como yo luchamos por cambiar las dinámicas negativas del sistema. Aunque el altavoz es pequeño si influye en la opinión de un solo inversor ya habrá merecido la pena. A eso nos agarramos para seguir haciendo lo que hacemos. El mejor marketing de GPM Asignación Táctica es la transparencia. Por eso comparte un Excel con sus posiciones. Este podcast está patrocinado por Dani Marín. Dani es un fisioterapeuta que un día descubrió que hablar se le daba mejor que tocar y que era capaz de transmitir ideas a las personas que las necesitaban. Ahora tiene un proyecto online, con un enfoque técnico pero a la vez entretenido sobre el funcionamiento del cerebro, y me manda este mensaje para los oyentes de Kapital: Si mientras lees esto estás con gente, busca a una persona y obsérvala durante 5 minutos, si estás solo abre la red social que quieras y mira cualquier post. En cualquier caso será más que suficiente para encontrar algún comportamiento que no te parezca ‘normal'. Me llamo Dani Marín y me dedico a enseñar cómo funciona el cerebro, la mente, las personas… que vendría a ser lo mismo. Lo hago en mi newsletter donde cuento cosas que te ayudan a comprender lo ‘anormal' del comportamiento humano o del tuyo mismo. Aprender, sentir dolor o vender algo depende del cerebro, entender cómo hacer para usarlo a tu favor depende de ti. Índice: 1.32. La psicología de las pérdidas. 8.38. Lecciones de vida en el póker. 24.20. No te compliques con tu estrategia de inversión. 53.42. Sacrificar rentabilidad a cambio de reducir volatilidad. 1.13.33. Los engranajes de la asignación táctica. 1.34.43. Comisiones de gestión activa en fondos indexados. 1.44.09. Ariely y la errónea percepción del valor. 1.59.26. Mourinho encontró la felicidad en Roma. Apuntes: La cartera permanente. Craig Rowland & J. M. Lawson. Expectativas racionales en inversión. William Bernstein. Common sense on mutual funds. John Bogle. The smartest investment book you'll ever read. Daniel Solin. Monte Carlo Millions. Phil Ivey. EPT Grand Final. Adrián Mateos. Predictably irrational. Dan Ariely.
¿Por qué lanzar un fondo con asignación táctica? ¿Por qué producir un podcast sobre finanzas personales? Ambas preguntas atacan un mismo problema y tanto Javier como yo luchamos por cambiar las dinámicas negativas del sistema. Aunque el altavoz es pequeño si influye en la opinión de un solo inversor ya habrá merecido la pena. A eso nos agarramos para seguir haciendo lo que hacemos. El mejor marketing de GPM Asignación Táctica es la transparencia. Por eso comparte un Excel con sus posiciones.Este podcast está patrocinado por Dani Marín.Dani es un fisioterapeuta que un día descubrió que hablar se le daba mejor que tocar y que era capaz de transmitir ideas a las personas que las necesitaban. Ahora tiene un proyecto online, con un enfoque técnico pero a la vez entretenido sobre el funcionamiento del cerebro, y me manda este mensaje para los oyentes de Kapital: Si mientras lees esto estás con gente, busca a una persona y obsérvala durante 5 minutos, si estás solo abre la red social que quieras y mira cualquier post. En cualquier caso será más que suficiente para encontrar algún comportamiento que no te parezca ‘normal'. Me llamo Dani Marín y me dedico a enseñar cómo funciona el cerebro, la mente, las personas… que vendría a ser lo mismo. Lo hago en mi newsletter donde cuento cosas que te ayudan a comprender lo ‘anormal' del comportamiento humano o del tuyo mismo. Aprender, sentir dolor o vender algo depende del cerebro, entender cómo hacer para usarlo a tu favor depende de ti.Índice:1.32. La psicología de las pérdidas.8.38. Lecciones de vida en el póker.24.20. No te compliques con tu estrategia de inversión.53.42. Sacrificar rentabilidad a cambio de reducir volatilidad.1.13.33. Los engranajes de la asignación táctica.1.34.43. Comisiones de gestión activa en fondos indexados.1.44.09. Ariely y la errónea percepción del valor.1.59.26. Mourinho encontró la felicidad en Roma.Apuntes:La cartera permanente. Craig Rowland & J. M. Lawson.Expectativas racionales en inversión. William Bernstein.Common sense on mutual funds. John Bogle.The smartest investment book you'll ever read. Daniel Solin.Monte Carlo Millions. Phil Ivey.EPT Grand Final. Adrián Mateos.Predictably irrational. Dan Ariely.
Would you help change a stranger's tire? How about if they offered you $20? Or, what if instead of money, they offered you some candy? We often think these types of exchanges are financial in nature - but this study explored how there is actually a different type of exchange going on here - a social exchange. When we help a friend move some furniture, invite friends over for dinner, help a stranger out who is in need - these are social exchanges in a social market, one that is separate from the financial market. And what's even more interesting is that if you bring money into the social exchange, it falls apart. James Heyman and Dan Ariely explored this phenomena in their landmark study called, “Effort for Payment: A Tale of Two Markets” and is the basis for Kurt and Tim taking a deep look in this Groove Track. Listen to find out the backstory to the study and the implications from the findings. You can also watch a special video recording of this Groove Track with Kurt and Tim on the Behavioral Grooves YouTube Channel. Links Heyman, J., & Ariely, D. (2004). Effort for Payment: A Tale of Two Markets. Psychological Science: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00757.x Behavioral Grooves on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jkmH8St_nsA&ab_channel=BehavioralGrooves
Em bate-papo com Leandro Vieira, o empreendedor em série Marcus Buaiz, famoso por suas parcerias em negócios que vão desde o entretenimento até gastronomia, explica como identificar oportunidades em diferentes segmentos, administrar os negócios e gerar valor. LIVROS DA SEMANA Em Previsivelmente Irracional, que já é um clássico na área de Marketing e Negócios, Ariely investiga as razões que guiam nossas decisões e desmonta o mito de que a racionalidade guia nossos julgamentos sobre tudo. Já em Positivamente Irracional, Ariely foca nos efeitos positivos e negativos que a irracionalidade pode ter nas nossas vidas pessoais e profissionais. > Ouça no Spotify e siga o Café com ADM no Instagram. Conteúdo patrocinado SEGURANÇA EM DOBRO O Itaú ajuda você a evitar os golpes no cartão de crédito, WhatsApp, PIX e muitos outros. Acesse o site da campanha e saiba como se proteger. Sobre o entrevistado Marcus Buaiz é sócio e conselheiro das empresas Spark, DryCat, Digia, Beedoo, B.Side, Studio Ventre, Geiko San, Azos e Jay 40. Também é embaixador do Banco BTG Pactual. Nascido no Espírito Santo, tem graduação em Administração pela Universidade Vila Velha e pós em marketing pela FGV. Marcus deu o “start” em sua carreira com o festival que foi fenômeno no estado – o “Vitória Pop Rock”, e estendeu seu currículo atuando em áreas desde o esporte, gastronomia e entretenimento. Já participou de grandes sociedades com nomes como Ronaldo e Pedro Paulo Diniz e chegou a administrar treze casas noturnas ao mesmo tempo, tendo vendido esses projetos no auge para fundos de investimento internacionais.
Hầu hết chúng ta đều nghĩ mình trung thực, nhưng trên thực tế, tất cả chúng ta đều dối trá. Từ Washington đến Phố Wall, từ lớp học đến nơi làm việc, hành vi phi đạo đức xuất hiện ở khắp mọi nơi. Không ai trong chúng là ngoại lệ, cho dù đó là một lời nói không gây hại (white lie) đến các báo cáo tài chính gian lận.Trong Bản Chất Của Dối Trá - cuốn sách từng đoạt giải thưởng lớn, tác giả sách bán chạy Dan Ariely giải thích tại sao một số điều dễ nói dối hơn những điều khác, làm thế nào có thể điềm tĩnh và tránh rủi ro nhất có thể khi bị lừa dối, cũng các cách hoạt động kinh doanh đã mở đường cho các hành vi phi đạo đức, cả cố ý lẫn vô ý như thế nào. Ariely khám phá cách thức hoạt động của các hành vi phi đạo đức trong cuộc sống cá nhân, công việc và chính trị, cũng như cách chúng gián tiếp hoặc trực tiếp ảnh hưởng tới chúng ta, ngay cả với những người có tiêu chuẩn đạo đức cao. Ariely cũng xác định những gì có thể giúp chúng ta trở nên trung thực hơn, hướng tới việc trở thành người có đạo đức hơn trong cuộc sống.--Về Fonos:Fonos là ứng dụng sách nói có bản quyền. Trên ứng dụng Fonos, bạn có thể nghe định dạng sách nói của những cuốn sách nổi tiếng nhất từ các tác giả trong nước và quốc tế. Ngoài ra, bạn được sử dụng miễn phí nội dung Premium khi đăng ký trở thành Hội viên của Fonos: Truyện ngủ, Nhạc thư giãn, Thiền định, Tóm tắt sách.--Tải ứng dụng Fonos tại: https://fonos.app.link/tai-fonosTìm hiểu về Fonos: https://fonos.vn/Theo dõi Facebook Fonos: https://www.facebook.com/fonosvietnam/Theo dõi Instagram Fonos: https://www.instagram.com/fonosvietnam/Đọc các bài viết thú vị về sách, tác giả sách, những thông tin hữu ích để phát triển bản thân: http://blog.fonos.vn/
Cette semaine, nous allons aborder le thème du mensonge. Pourquoi sait-on mentir ? A-t-on déjà vu d'autres espèces mentir ou est-ce le propre de l'Humain ? Que se passe-t-il dans notre cerveau lorsqu'on dit un mensonge ? A partir de quel âge un enfant arrive-t-il à mentir ? Le détecteur tel qu'on le connaît et voit dans les films est-il fiable ? Existe-t-il d'autres outils pouvant détecter un mensonge ? J'adore ce sujet du mensonge parce qu'on est réellement tous concernés. On ment tous un jour, un petit peu dans sa vie. Nous mentons pour sauver la face, pour éviter de blesser les autres, pour impressionner les autres, pour cacher des actions, pour éviter les conflits inutiles, pour pas aller à une soirée alors que la vraie raison c'est juste que t'as 30 ans et que t'es crevée H24, et bien d'autres raisons encore.Soutenir et s'abonner à NeurosapiensProduction, animation, réalisation et illustration : Anaïs RouxInstagram : https://www.instagram.com/neurosapiens.podcast/neurosapiens.podcast@gmail.comMusique d'intro KEEP ON GOINGMusique proposée par La Musique LibreJoakim Karud - Keep On Going : https://youtu.be/lOfg0jRqaA8Joakim Karud : https://soundcloud.com/joakimkarudSOURCESCues to Deception. B. M. DePaulo et al. in Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 129, No. 1, pages 74–118; January 2003.Patterns of Neural Activity Associated with Honest and Dishonest Moral Decisions. Joshua D. Greene and Joseph M. Paxton in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, Vol. 106, No. 30, pages 12,506–12,511; July 28, 2009.From Junior to Senior Pinocchio: A Cross-Sectional Lifespan Investigation of Deception. Evelyne Debey et al. in Acta Psychologica, Vol. 160, pages 58–68; September 2015.Lying Takes Time: A Meta-analysis on Reaction Time Measures of Deception. Kristina Suchotzki et al. in Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 143, No. 4, pages 428–453; April 2017.Garrett, N., Lazzaro, S., Ariely, D. et al. The brain adapts to dishonesty. Nat Neurosci 19, 1727–1732 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4426DePaulo BM, Kashy DA, Kirkendol SE, Wyer MM, Epstein JA. Lying in everyday life. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996 May;70(5):979-95. PMID: 8656340. Voir Acast.com/privacy pour les informations sur la vie privée et l'opt-out. Become a member at https://plus.acast.com/s/neurosapiens.
Today we're looking back at some of our most popular episode in the first half of 2022 covering a range of topics with some amazing guests. I know it's hard to listen to every episode, so we picked some clips from our most downloaded episodes for you. We already have a great lineup for 3Q22, so be sure to subscribe to the show or share with a friend who hasn't listened yet! (0:38) - Sponsor: Bonner Private Wine Partnership (1:50) - Intro (2:14) - John Arnold (8:59) - Whitney Baker (14:00) - Jeremy Grantham (20:12) - Ivy Zelman (24:28) - Gio Valiante (27:08) - Dylan Grice (30:49) - Antii Illmanen (36:20) - Chris Bloomstran (37:56) - Peter Zeihan (44:28) - Dan Ariely ----- Follow Meb on Twitter, LinkedIn and YouTube For detailed show notes, click here To learn more about our funds and follow us, subscribe to our mailing list or visit us at cambriainvestments.com ----- Today's episode is sponsored by the Bonner Private Wine Partnership. Founded in 2019 by Will Bonner, the Bonner Private Wine Partnership is a group of wine lovers who come together to import great, small batch wines that might otherwise get overlooked by large importers. Click here to get 4 bottles of wine for almost half off plus free shipping. ----- Interested in sponsoring the show? Email us at Feedback@TheMebFaberShow.com ----- Past guests include Ed Thorp, Richard Thaler, Jeremy Grantham, Joel Greenblatt, Campbell Harvey, Ivy Zelman, Kathryn Kaminski, Jason Calacanis, Whitney Baker, Aswath Damodaran, Howard Marks, Tom Barton, and many more. ----- Meb's invested in some awesome startups that have passed along discounts to our listeners. Check them out here!
In this episode, Manny and Dylan talk about a recent high-profile tenure decision involving Michael Kraus, a psychologist and Associate Professor at the Yale School of Management. Do Ivy League schools promote from within? Are tenure decisions based on merit, or based on ideological preferences of senior faculty? Then, we highlight some of Kraus's influential research, and specifically do a deep dive into some papers he's published on the psychology of inequality. Also mentioned in the episode: Dylan's NPR interview about the science of dreams, Dylan's Heterodox Academy interview about education and learning, and Manny's Master's Thesis. http://www.michaelwkraus.com/ Michal Kraus's publication record 2016 review of Yale's Faculty of Arts and Sciences Tenure Appointment Policy 25 Ways to Reduce the Cost of College - Center for College Affordability and Productivity Norton, M. I., & Ariely, D. (2011). Building a Better America—One Wealth Quintile at a Time. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 9–12. Kraus, M. W., & Tan, J. J. (2015). Americans overestimate social class mobility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 58, 101-111. Kraus, M. W., Rucker, J. M., & Richeson, J. A. (2017). Americans misperceive racial economic equality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(39), 10324-10331. Tan, J. J., Kraus, M. W., Carpenter, N. C., & Adler, N. E. (2020). The association between objective and subjective socioeconomic status and subjective well-being: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 146(11), 970. Recent op-ed by Kraus in LA Times about perceptions of inequality Photo by DS stories from Pexels
In this episode, we start at the Tokyo Olympics and end at a deep dive into why fringe internet communities such as 'incels' and 'femcels' are dissatisfied with their looks and dating by considering Leonhard Et al's paper on dating preferences based on one's own looks. This falls into the category of Festinger's dissonance theory, where couples in such one member is significantly dating down in physical attractiveness undergoes cognitive dissonance in an attempt to justify their reasoning for the large gap in physical attractiveness. As we go through the research in this episode, the results are actually quite surprising and not something you would guess intuitively.Lee, Leonard; Loewenstein, George; Ariely, Dan; Hong, James; Young, Jim (2008). If I'm Not Hot, Are You Hot or Not? Physical-Attractiveness Evaluations and Dating Preferences as a Function of One's Own Attractiveness. Psychological Science, 19(7), 669–677. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02141.x
Dan Ariely, expert in decision-making and behavioral economics, reveals the science behind online dating in part 2 of this life-changing episode of the Phil in The Blanks podcast. Plus, he shares how to make the most of the massive, destabilizing interruption to our daily lives and healthy routines COVID-19 has wrought. Ariely also teaches how to program your behaviors and empower your instincts to yield exciting, long-term benefits. For more information: www.drphilintheblanks.com Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
As more Americans get vaccinated against Covid-19, both President Biden and Gov. Scott are predicting that life will return to normal by this summer. But now a new public health threat is emerging: people who refuse to get vaccinated. Vaccine hesitancy may become a risk factor for getting infected by Covid-19. There is a striking partisan dimension to vaccine hesitancy: in a recent CBS News poll, a third of Republicans said that they would not be vaccinated — versus 10 percent of Democrats — and another 20 percent of Republicans said they were unsure. Why are some people reluctant to get vaccinated against a deadly disease? What works to change people's minds? For answers, we turned to Dan Ariely, professor of psychology and behavioral economics at Duke University and a founding member of the Center for Advanced Hindsight. He is also a columnist for the Wall Street Journal writing on behavior change. Ariely studies the irrational ways people behave and designs ways to make human behavior more rational.
© 2020-2025 Ivy Podcast Discovery LLC
