Podcasts about schillings

Vandaag het gesprek met Minou Schillings. Minou is een transformatie facilitator voor regeneratieve toekomsten. Ze ontwerpt ervaringen die uitnodigen tot het ontleren van oude manieren en wereldbeelden. Ze helpt individuen en gemeenschappen bij het inbeelden van radicaal andere toekomsten en het ontwikkelen van de capaciteiten die nodig zijn voor de transitie naar een bloeiende en leefbare wereld. Laten we beginnen… Wat ik zoal leerde van Minou: 00:00 intro 01:45 De mens moet regeneratief zijn om bij te dragen aan de toekomstigheid van het leven op aarde. 02:30 Regeneratief staat vast en toekomsten is heel breed. 03:25 Meer terug naar leven in een gemeenschap die samen bijdragen aan voedsel en de natuur. 04:30 Een nieuwe manier van educatie verkent die kinderen en volwassenen ontwikkelen. 05:15 Een beeld van wonen in de toekomst, een combinatie tussen Dune, Avatar en Pipi Langkous. 07:30 Waarom is een school nu zoals deze nu is? 09:20 Het doel van hyper optimalisatie, consumptie en productiviteit werkt misschien voor een klein deel van de maatschappij dat daar de vruchten van plukt. 10:30 Niet erkennen waarom de overstromingen nu zo vaak voorkomen is doodeng. 12:10 Waarom is samenleven en samen zo belangrijk voor Minou. Het gevaar van de meritocratie. 15:15 Meer mensen zouden dromer moeten zijn. 20:00 Hoe kunnen we ons gedrag veranderen terwijl we de pijn nog niet zelf ervaren. 23:00 We veranderen in zombies. 24:30 Zoeken naar de gedeelde verhalen voor compassie. 26:30 Het gedeelde verhaal zoeken voor een regenerative experience design. 29:35 Ze leeft het liefst in een wereld waar marketing als concept niet bestaat. 30:40 Marketing in de huidige vorm is een grote drijfveer van overconsumptie en overproductie. 31:25 De capaciteiten van marketeers kunnen enorm bijdragen aan regeneratieve toekomsten, maar niet meer vanuit competitie, tekort en verlangens. 39:15 De illusie van maakbaarheid en planbaarheid van de toekomst. 40:15 Loslaten en niet kunnen plannen is doodeng. 42:00 We maken de verhalen te groot. 44:00 Een korte uitleg over de geefeconomie. 45:05 Donatie gebaseerde winst. De echte kosten worden door berekend en achteraf bepaal je hoeveel extra je wil betalen voor de winst van de ondernemer. 50:15 Hoe kun je anders denken en de paden verkennen. 55:15 De oefening The bus within us. voor een betere besluitvorming. Meer over Minou Schillings: https://minouschillings.substack.com/  https://www.linkedin.com/in/minouschillings/ https://thegreensprint.com Andere bronnen: Goede uitleg over Regenerative https://www.mkbservicedesk.nl/duurzaam-ondernemen/duurzame-bedrijfsvoering/ondernemen-vanuit-een-regeneratieve-lens Dune, Avatar en Pipi Langkous 15-minute city From what is to what if Unleashing the power of imagination to create the future we want - Rob Hopkins Democratisch besluiten hoe we grondstoffen gaan gebruiken – Jolijn Hooghwinkel Initiatiefnemers Geefeconomie Petra Smolder en Robbert Vesseur Hospicing Modernity by Vanessa Machado de Oliveira Video van het gesprek met Minou Schillings https://youtu.be/F8voEPlQsHw Kijk hier https://youtu.be/F8voEPlQsHw

Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: Animal advocates should campaign to restrict AI precision livestock farming, published by Zachary Brown on June 18, 2024 on The Effective Altruism Forum. Here's a fairly safe prediction: most of the potential harm from AI is potential harm to nonhuman animals. It's a safe[1] prediction because there are so many more nonhuman animals than there are humans. Many of these animals presently live in conditions where their lives are influenced or controlled by human activity. Since AI will increasingly substitute for human activity, many animals' lives might therefore someday be controlled or influenced by AI. Indeed, while there are just over 8 billion people, there are around a zillion[2] animals farmed each year, the majority on factory farms, where their lives are nearly entirely determined by human choices. Factory farms, then, are an enormous and terrifying arena for AI-caused harm. Accordingly, when we talk about AI governance and risks from AI, risks to nonhuman animals should be a major part of that conversation, alongside e.g. biorisks and discrimination. Unfortunately, this is basically never the case. For instance, the mostly commendable recent International Scientific Report on the Safety of Advanced AI: Interim Report, a long and comprehensive document, with a long and comprehensive name, written by committee and designed to achieve global consensus on AI risks, does not even mention animal welfare risks - does not even mention animals, or agriculture, or anything like that - at all. This blog post is a small attempt to rectify the imbalance. I want to share my thoughts about a specific AI technology: precision livestock farming. I'll argue that, while I am uncertain about whether AI precision farming technology will be good or bad for animal welfare on a per-animal basis, I think we can be much more confident that it will be bad on a total population basis, since it will likely increase the total number of farmed animals. Largely in view of this argument, but also for political feasibility reasons, I think we should consider advocating for restrictions on precision livestock farming in industrial settings. 'AI' can mean a lot of different things When we talk about the effects of AI on animal welfare, it is essential to distinguish different types of AI systems. 'How will AI affect animals?' is uselessly broad. There are a number of different AI technologies we should distinguish between: precision livestock farming, AI genetics and breeding programs, language models used by the general public, AI adoption by activists, AI adoption by alternative protein producers, models used to decode animal thoughts, and others. All quite different, and it's hard to know what the aggregate effect of these technologies will be. A lot of these technologies are important, but my focus here is on precision livestock farming. What is precision livestock farming? Precision livestock farming (PLF), as I understand it, basically means putting in place a bunch of sensors and instruments that gather data about individual farmed animals, and then having some algorithm - this could be a neural network, but might be something much more basic - manage features of the animals' environment, based on the gathered data, in order to 'optimise' farming. The classic example is an automated feeding system, which gathers data about individual animals' feeding behaviour and health and stuff and automatically distributes food in response to the gathered data. In theory, systems like this can be designed to make sure all animals are having a great time. In practice, systems like this will often be designed, I expect, to further intensify animal agriculture. What do we know about the particular technologies that are currently being implemented? According to this paper (Schillings et al, 2021), the f...

Sarah Huebsch Schilling and Kelsey Schilling are spouses, early musicians and faculty members at the annual Renaissance Music Retreat from Interlochen's College of Creative Arts. The Schillings visited Studio A with pairs of recorders and crumhorns to demonstrate some of the music they're teaching and performing this week.

In the world of communications, it pays to be current. Whether you are working in-house or at an agency, being the first to say “But have you read that piece in the FT today?” makes you appear as though you have a finger on the media pulse. This week on the Little Questions Podcast, we attempt to sound like we're at the cutting edge of public discourse. Today we're going to chew the topical cud on:   Why have a Budget Statement when everything in it has already been publicised in the press? Getting cut through on a story – some contrasting examples from Tesco and Drax. The slugging match that is Huffy Henry Staunton vs Bruiser Badenoch. Mary Poppins and the use of inappropriate words. An amazing BP insider trading story. The nature of the worthless public apology. The legal firm Schillings going into PR ‘big time'. And a sad story of Flaco the eagle-owl. As ever, for you as a listener in the world of comms and beyond, we'll extract the lessons learnt from all these stories and deliver them in this episode of The Little Questions. Find out more about Apella Advisors at www.apellaadvisors.com and you can get in touch by emailing podcast@apellaadvisors.com and if you enjoy this episode, please consider leaving us a review. Matt Young is an Apella Advisors partner with 25 years of experience in corporate affairs. He was Corporate Affairs Director at Lloyds Banking Group, part of the senior team which rescued the bank and rebuilt its reputation following the financial crisis. Formerly communications director at Santander UK and board member of the BBA. Experienced in corporate communications; public affairs and policy; regulatory affairs and risk; industrial relations; crisis and complex issues management; reputation turnarounds; campaigns, competition; and ESG. Former Head of Public Affairs and Public Policy at TSB Bank. Previously a Partner at a global communications agency and has worked in the media and politics. Andrew Brown is an Apella Advisors partner, a former Director of Communications and Public Affairs at Ageas Insurance. He has more than ten years' experience leading the corporate affairs functions for global firms across a range of regulated and unregulated sectors, developing considerable experience in issues, crisis and change management. Formerly Director of Communications at Drax Group plc and Group Corporate Affairs Director at Regus plc.  This podcast is produced by The Podcast Coach.

Noise in Brief – a shorter offshoot of PRWeek's Beyond the Noise podcast – is released fortnightly and features PRWeek UK journalists discussing major issues from the previous seven days or so.Download the podcast via Apple, Spotify, or listen on your favourite platform.This week's edition is hosted by PRWeek UK news editor Siobhan Holt and features reporter Evie Barrett and PRWeek UK editor John Harrington.The trio discuss the major talking points behind recent industry hires, departures and promotions.They analyse promotions and departures at Burson (the new agency being formed from the merger of Hill & Knowlton and BCW) and Brunswick; and discuss whether law firm-owned agency Schillings Communications poses a real threat to big advisory firms.There's also a look at the Super Bowl 2024 campaigns, and the team asks if purpose marketing has entered a new era. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Woop! Woop! Auch heute etwas außer der Reihe, aber tagesaktueller den je eine Folge zu den Bauernprotesten mit Monologpart und Zahlen und Fakten zur deutschen Landwirtschaft und einem Gespräch mit dem Landwirt Willi Kremer-Schillings. Enjoy!^^

In Episode 44, Caroline Garnham talks to Rachel Atkins, a leading Reputation and Privacy lawyer and Partner at Schillings. Schillings is the only law firm with all the specialists to cater to every situation that affects privacy, reputation, and security. Rachel is the Head of the Legal Team at Schillings and is a highly skilled problem solver. Her clients say she is a 'ninja litigator that can see around corners' and 'She is fantastic at her job, and nothing fazes her.' She is featured in multiple industry rankings, including Spears' Best Reputation and Privacy Lawyers for High Net Worth Individuals in 2023 and the Citywealth Top 100 International Private Client Litigation Lawyers list.   CONNECT WITH RACHEL: ⁠Schillings⁠ ⁠⁠LinkedIn⁠   CONNECT WITH CAROLINE: Our club ⁠⁠newsletter⁠⁠ gives you real-life stories and examples of how our club professionals can guide you on ‘How to Keep Your Money' ⁠⁠Caroline's Club⁠⁠ ⁠⁠LinkedIn⁠⁠ caroline@carolines.club

Promotional Links: Seeds of Tao Incubation Cohort - Launching early 2024, enrollment is opening in October 2023 for our first incubation cohort designed to help regenerative businesses accomplish their goals, and have a consistent support network along the way.  

Big themes and stories in comms from the past week or so are put under the microscope in the latest edition of Noise in Brief, PRWeek UK's bite-sized podcast.Noise in Brief – a shorter offshoot of PRWeek's Beyond the Noise podcast – is released fortnightly and features PRWeek journalists discussing major issues from the previous seven days or so.Download the podcast via Apple, Spotify, or listen on your favourite platform.This week's episode features PRWeek UK news editor Siobhan Holt and reporters Evie Barrett and Elizabeth Wiredu.PRWeek UK has launched the results of its Generation Z survey, offering insight into what young PR practitioners want from their careers. In the podcast, the team discuss Gen Z's approach to AI technology and how often they want to be in the office.The team also focus on Edelman's latest Trust at Work Report and what that reveals about the next generation in PR.The trio also chat about the latest edition of PRWeek's Top 150 Monthly Trading Tracker, which asks UK agencies about how long clients are taking to pay and how many pitches agencies are taking part in.With law firm Schillings announcing plans to set up a comms agency last week, the three journalists debate the crossover between legal advisory and PR, and talk about the key job hires that caught their eye over the past week. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Dr. Wolfgang Schillings, Sportmediziner im Athleticum des Universitätsklinikums Hamburg-Eppendorf, spricht in der aktuellen Folge mit Team-Managerin Jule Bartsch über die fünf klassischen Läuferverletzungen, wie sie entstehen und was zu tun ist, wenn sie da sind. Außerdem gibt er Hinweise, wie der gesunde Wiedereinstieg in das Training gelingt.

 This week Meg is joined by Joint Managing Director Michael to discuss the recent departures from Kirkland & Ellis, ongoing developments at Axiom Ince and the news that Schillings is opening a PR arm. They also look ahead to what's coming up this quarter including the A&O and Shearman merger and what transactional practices should expect for the end of the year. 

Thu, 29 Jun 2023 12:32:59 +0000 https://omt-magazin.podigee.io/9324-neue-episode 87604bd6e342a9d852fdb171c639da4d ℹ️ Leonie Schillings beim OMT ℹ️ OMT-Webinare ℹ️ OMT Konferenz ℹ️ Agency Day 2023 9324 full no Carina Kreutner, Le

Podcast Sonderfolge mit Dr. Oliver Schillings über das #nft Projekt Kölner Dom.Oliver hat mit seiner Agentur das NFT Projekt aufgezogen und begleitet.Was es mit dem Projekt auf sich hat, wie der Start war und was noch kommen soll, erfahrt ihr hier.#köln #kölnerdom #web3 #metaverse #7art #podcast #allinnfthttps://www.domecolognenft.com/de-collection/index.html** weitere freiwillige Unterstützung:https://www.patreon.com/user?u=86396667Newsletter Barista Insights by Mic_Sebhttps://tab728b31.emailsys1a.net/247/735/e3ee874dc3/subscribe/form.html?_g=1695576545ALL IN NFT Homepage:https://www.allinnft.de/ALL IN NFT Merchandising Shop:https://all-in-nft.myshopify.com/Opensea Kollektion ALL IN NFT:https://opensea.io/assets/ETHEREUM/0x71608b3551895385637d59c3713e7369ecac2e97/0Linktree :https://linktr.ee/mic_sebDiscord: https://discord.gg/4js6Pg7FJkTwitter: @MicSeb91https://twitter.com/MicSeb91Twitch: https://twitch.tv/mic_sebYouTube: All in NFThttps://www.youtube.com/@Mic_Seb**Blockpit Code für deine einfache Steuererklärung mit Krypto und NFT Wallets:https://blockpit.cello.so/v7peWE3ssIIKontakt:Sebastian@allinnft.deGM Coffee Handy:+491733544148Bei den oben genannten Themen handelt es sich um keine Anlageberatungen. Der Podcast dient lediglich der Unterhaltung.Die mit ** gekennzeichneten Links sind sogenannte Affiliate-/ oder Unterstützungs-Links. Kommt über einen solchen Link ein Einkauf zustande, werde ich mit einer Provision beteiligt. Für Dich entstehen dabei keine Mehrkosten. Wo, wann und wie Du ein Produkt kaufst, bleibt natürlich Dir überlassen. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/sebastian-michels7/message

Tier- und umweltfreundliche Landwirtschaft muss bezahlt werden, sagt Dr. Willi Kremer-Schillings – bekannt als Blogger Bauer Willi. Der konventionelle Landwirt aus Rommerskirchen ist überzeugt: Nachhaltigkeit und günstige Preise gehen nicht zusammen. Moderation: Anja Backhaus Von WDR 5.

„Der Bauer ist der Sündenbock für Verbraucher, Politiker und Umweltlobbyisten“. Das sagt Landwirt, Agraringenieur und Blogger Dr. Willi Kremer-Schillings. Der Autor der Buchs „Satt und unzufrieden“ prangert absurde Bürokratie und unsinnige Gesetze der Politik an und glaubt, so werde die Versorgungssicherheit für Lebensmittel gefährdet. „Man muss alle Seiten kennen, um zu urteilen, so Kremer-Schillings. Ein Gespräch auch über Mafia-Methoden der Lebensmittelhändler, Insektensterben und Glyphosat.   Ich würde mich freuen, wenn ihr meine unabhängige journalistische Arbeit unterstützt, damit ich auch in Zukunft weitermachen kann. Vielen Dank! Ich möchte mich auch ganz herzlich bei allen bedanken, die mich bereits unterstützen. Milena Preradovic Name: Milena Preradovic IBAN: AT40 2070 2000 2509 6694 BIC: SPFNAT21XXX oder https://paypal.me/punktpreradovic   Buchbestellung: https://www.westendverlag.de/buch/satt-und-unzufrieden/ Blog: Blog: https://www.bauerwilli.com/ ------------------------- Website: https://punkt-preradovic.com Odysee: https://odysee.com/@Punkt.PRERADOVIC:f Telegram: https://t.me/punktpreradovic Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/milena-preradovic-4a2836147/?originalSubdomain=at Twitter: https://twitter.com/punktpreradovic Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/punktpreradovic/ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/punktpreradovic/ theplattform: https://theplattform.net     #landwirtschaft #bauern #politik #glyphosat #insekten #insektensterben #lebensmittelhandel #mafia #nutztiere #bürokratie #ngo #umwelt #naturschutz #klima #höfesterben

Plodroch, Inawww.deutschlandfunk.de, CorsoDirekter Link zur Audiodatei

Johnny Depp is reportedly dating a lawyer who represented him in his 2020 High Court libel trial. Depp, 59, is said to be getting ‘serious' with 37-year-old Joelle Rich — a partner at major international law firm Schillings — with them meeting ‘discretely' in hotels. “Their chemistry is off the charts,” a source told US Weekly. “It's serious between them. They are the real deal.” Ms Rich was not part of the legal team who represented Depp in his defamation trial against Amber Heard earlier this year, but she attended the trial in Fairfax, Virginia, to reportedly “support” the Pirates of the Caribbean actor.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Joelle Rich, de 59 años, trabaja para el bufete Schillings y defendió al actor estadounidense en su juicio contra el diario The Sun Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Joelle Rich, de 59 años, trabaja para el bufete Schillings y defendió al actor estadounidense en su juicio contra el diario The Sun Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Bill never imagined owning a business club, but that is where his journey took him. He has since sold the business and is now writing a book. In this episode, we discuss how he ended up owning the club, the culture he helped to create and how he dealt with the challenges of owning a business. 

WNBA star Brittney Griner has been "wrongfully detained" in Russia for over 150 days now. However, former three-time World Series champion Curt Schilling doesn't appear to see it that way. In the earliest hours of Sunday morning, Schilling shot back by quote tweeting LeBron James' comments on the BG situation, saying that the Phoenix Mercury center should "pay the penalty" for her actions. https://www.facebook.com/groups/10902... https://www.spreaker.com/episode/4972... Twitter.com Hardtalkradio Live in 4k Instagram Hardtalk79 Anchor.fm https://anchor.fm/red-pill-man https://cash.app/$HARDTRADIO Feel free to donate if you feel to do so and like the content. If you have any current event stories or videos that you want me to cover hit me up at Redpillman1988@gmail.com --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/red-pill-man/support

Astor Perkins cybersecurity panel with private family offices: Peter Yapp, Partner at Schillings, Owen Duckman, Managing Director at Wittington Investments, Frank Cress, CTO of Tawani Enterprises and Neel Mullick, CISO of Trusted Family.

Lily and Juliet are joined by Susan Kent, who advises hedge funds and companies on investment opportunities, legal claims and shareholder campaigns. This week they're talking about financial investigations including short selling.What is short selling? Well, according to Investopedia....Short selling (also known as “shorting,” “selling short” or “going short”) refers to the sale of a security or financial instrument that the seller has borrowed to make the short sale. The short seller believes that the borrowed security's price will decline, enabling it to be bought back at a lower price for a profit. The difference between the price at which the security was sold short and the price at which it was purchased represents the short seller's profit (or loss, as the case may be).Listen in to find out how firms like Schillings use experts like Susan to investigate possible cases of short selling.For more information about Schillings, click here and to contact the team, email Plainsight@schillingspartners.com.

In this episode Lily Kennett and Juliet Young talk to Schillings' Cyber expert Gurpreet Thathy - or G as he's known to his colleagues - to lift the lid on the world of metadata. Lily and Juliet explore how metadata can assist an investigation and Gurpreet quizzes them on what info is held in images and computer files.Gurpreet has extensive experience in digital forensic investigations and his experience includes investigations on computers and mobile devices as well as other computer peripherals for law enforcement, government agencies, corporates and HNWIs. Gurpreet also manages Technical Surveillance and Counter Measures (TSCM) sweeps where he has gone into organisations and looked for any physical evidence of any eavesdropping devices using various equipment and methodologies.For more information about Schillings, click here and to contact the team, email Plainsight@schillingspartners.com.

In episode three of Hidden in Plain Sight, Lily and Juliet talk to Antonia Kimbell from the Art Loss Register, the world's largest private database of stolen art, antiques and collectables, and explore how databases like that one can help investigations.They tackle international art theft as well as the challenges involved when trying to establish the provenance of a piece.For more information about Schillings, click here and to contact the team, email Plainsight@schillingspartners.com.

On this episode East Side Mas returns to the table! J'Lynn asks could you marry someone who behaves like you (3:45), Tyler got cut off (6:00), internet friends (12:35), Tyler talks co-parenting (17:30), DaBaby (25:15), dating with age (54:40) and more! Check out Ihlana's website www.ihlananiayla.com Stream the NEW single from The Phases Project "All Night Long" https://song.link/us/i/1573168072 Book with Marvelous Mynx IG: @marvelousmynxboutique East Side Mas' catalog Dear Therapy https://song.link/us/i/1572050522 Drug Lord https://song.link/us/i/1570660365 South Beach https://song.link/us/i/1569281646 Lost Summer https://album.link/us/i/1523701581 Lover's Only EP https://album.link/us/i/1536074086 Sunset Drive https://album.link/us/i/1473221431 Me EP https://album.link/us/i/1446228044 Keep up with us via social media! Tyler IG: @TopRopeTyler Tyler Twitter: TopRopeTyler De'Anna Twitter: @dntinsley De'Anna IG: @dntinsley J'Lynn Twitter: @insidethejai J'Lynn IG: @insidethejai Ihlana IG: @ihlananiayla

In episode two of Hidden in Plain Sight, Lily and Juliet talk us through how to get an investigation underway, why the client might be the best starting point and why it's best to remove the source that disappoints.They also talk about the value of a good Excel spreadsheet and give their top five tips for starting an investigation.For more information about Schillings, click here and to contact the team, email Plainsight@schillingspartners.com.

In the very first episode of Hidden in Plain Sight, Lily Kennett and Juliet Young introduce us to the world of legal investigations and why they wanted to start this podcast.They also explain how they ended up running the investigations team at Schillings and what's coming up in this brand new series.For more information about Schillings, click here and to contact the team, email Plainsight@schillingspartners.com.

The 50 second video that changed former health secretary Matt Hancock's life forever was published by The Sun on 25 June 2021. But before printing a scoop about a politician's private life, there are so many factors a news outlet needs to consider. In this episode, host Dermot Murnaghan is joined by Harry Cole, The Sun's political editor, who broke the Hancock scandal story, and Rachel Atkins, Partner at Schillings law firm and expert in privacy and reputation law.

Baby Lili is not yet a week old and already the media are gunning for bad news to spew about her. If this is how Lili's life is to be from now on,  this poor little child doesn't stand a chance. So what is the drama. The fuss is over Meghan and Harry's decision to give their daughter the first name Lilibet a nickname also used for the Queen by close family members.When the announcement of Lili's birth was made by Meghan and Harry on June 6th the whole world was cooing about how lovely it was,  for Meghan and Harry to have honoured the Queen by choosing Lilibet as their baby girl's first name and Diana as the middle name. There was a day of grace when it seemed that hardly anyone had anything bad to say about Meghan and Harry. Harry's Royal relatives were very happy for Meghan, Happy and Archie, with Kate and William and Princess Eugenie posting their well wishes on social media and even on the Queen's twitter account. The choice of name was acknowledged in the Queen's message saying “Congratulations to The Duke and Duchess of Sussex on the birth of Lilibet Diana! The Queen, The Prince of Wales and The Duchess of Cornwall and The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge are delighted with the news.” By then end of Friday the media claws started coming back out. True to form,  it was the UK Daily Mail newspaper who in their June 6th article written by Royal Commentator Richard Kay, first sewed a seed of doubt as to whether Meghan and Harry had sought the Queen's permission prior to naming their daughter Lilibet.  In his article, Mr. Kay throws in the little hint of controversy when he writes “Such is the closeness between grandmother and grandson many will assume Harry must have sought her permission to use such a private name.”This one sentence then set off a tsunami of media reports all now outright alledging either (1) that Harry did not seek the Queen's permission prior to naming his daughter Lilibet or (2) Prince Harry presented his request in such a way that the Queen had no choice but to agree. The story continued to grow and grow. Things really heated up when Jonny Dymond,  the Royal correspondent for the BBC news,  wrote an article saying  that according to unnamed Palace sources, the Queen was not asked by Meghan and Harry about naming their daughter Lilibet.Meghan and Harry brought in their official spokespeople & a statement was issued to say:  “The Duke spoke with his family in advance of the announcement,  in fact his grandmother was the first family member he called,” .. “During that conversation, he shared their hope of naming their daughter Lilibet in her honour. Had she not been supportive, they would not have used the name.”Sadly now the lawyers are all involved with law firm Schillings, which acts for Harry and Meghan, reportedly saying that the BBC report that the Queen was not asked for permission to use the name Lilibet was false and defamatory and should not be repeatedAnd Lili is not yet 7 days old at this point. And what of Mr. Kay at the Daily Mail the man whose comment started off the whole ruckus. Well in his article today he asks is there nothing Harry and Meghan do that doesn't involve a row? Mr. Kay adds how desperately sad that even something so uplifting as the birth of their new baby is accompanied by thundering controversy. So there we have it Mr. Kay blames Harry for creating the storm when Harry is merely reacting to the storm that Mr. Kay  helped cause. And that folks is how sneaky the UK press are.Please keep listening for future podcasts on all things Meghan, Harry , Archie and Lili. You can reach out to me though my blog at https://www.kindthoughtsformeghanmarkle.com/

In this episode, Anthony is joined by award-winning author and journalist Nina Burleigh, to discuss her new book ‘Virus: Vaccinations, the CDC and the Hijacking of America’s Response to the Pandemic,’ and what she’d say to the many people resisting the coronavirus vaccine.Walter Isaacson is a renowned author, journalist and professor and talks with Anthony about his new book, ‘The Code Breaker: Jennifer Doudna, Gene Editing, and the Future of the Human Race,’ his career as a biographer - and the common traits found in groundbreaking people. Finally, Tim Robinson, partner at Schillings and former major general in the British Army, illustrates how skills required in a war zone such as “action-oriented” leadership can be applied to the boardroom, and what steps we can take to deal with the impending threat of disinformation.  Follow our guests on Twitter:https://twitter.com/ninaburleigh https://twitter.com/WalterIsaacson Follow us:https://twitter.com/moochfm https://twitter.com/scaramucci  Sign up for our newsletter at:www.mooch.fm Created & produced by Podcast Partners:www.podcastpartners.com 

Autor: Hübert, Henning Sendung: @mediasres Hören bis: 19.01.2038 04:14

On the next Dallas Design Sprints podcast, we're very happy to showcase Minou Schillings. She’s the co-founder of the Green Sprint, sustainable innovation advocate and design sprint facilitator, living and working from the Netherlands. Listen to this episode on iTunes: https://apple.co/2C4yBHC Minou and I talk about creative versus lateral thinking, how human centered design influences the way we look at sustainability, and her upcoming sustainability session on circularity & consumerism. Hope you enjoy the show! ----- Meet Minou: “I have spent the last several years enriching my experience with design thinking, systems thinking and sustainable development. And I know focuses all my creative and innovative efforts on accelerating the global sustainability agenda. To empower the sustainable development movement we set up The Green Sprint,

Cybersecurity keynote by Peter Yapp, Partner at Schillings & Former Deputy Director of UK's National Cyber Security Centre.

In this episode I sit down with Victoria Anderson, CEO at Big Voice London and Associate at Schillings, to discuss the importance of social mobility and volunteering and how charities and firms can inspire the next generation of lawyers. You can connect with: Big Voice London at https://www.bigvoicelondon.co.uk/aboutbigvoicelondon and https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-big-voice-london Victoria at https://www.linkedin.com/in/victoria-anderson-01226278

It's been a big year for media lawyers. There's been the Johnny Depp libel trial, Harry and Meghan suing The Mail on Sunday, and the newsroom drama over Barnard Castle. Amol Rajan reunites the lawyers from both sides of the Depp case to debate press behaviour. Also in the programme, the backstory to the Mail's famous front page demanding justice for Stephen Lawrence, and how The Guardian came to trust Julian Assange as a source. Guests: Jenny Afia, Partner at Schillings; Louis Charalambous, head of the Media Content and Disputes Team at Simons Muirhead & Burton; Gill Phillips, Director of Editorial Legal Services for The Guardian; Eddie Young, former legal adviser to Associated Newspapers and contributor to Mail+ podcast The Murder That Shamed Britain. Producer: Hannah Sander

In this week's Family Office Connections, we are joined by Tim Robinson, Partner at Schillings, to discuss our family office risk survey findings. Listen now as he covers the impact of underestimation of cyber risks, insider threats, and common themes when family office security is attacked.

Online Smears and Cyber Attacks: Schillings partners Amy Pope, Rachel Atkins and Gillian Duffy join host Richard Levick to discuss the escalating war of online smears and cyber attacks and what companies and people can do to minimize risks and fight back.

Johnny Depp has lost his highly publicised libel case against the publisher of Britain's The Sun newspaper, whose claim that he was an abusive husband sparked a courtroom showdown between the Hollywood star and his ex-wife, actress Amber Heard, earlier this year.Depp sued News Group Newspapers and Dan Wootton — The Sun's executive editor — over an article that claimed the "Pirates of the Caribbean" star was violent toward Heard while they were together.But the UK's High Court ruled in the publisher's favor on Monday.Citing evidence, including photos, audio recordings and Depp's own text messages, lawyers for the newspaper group argued in court filings that Depp "beat his wife Amber Heard, causing her to suffer significant injury, and on occasion leading to her fearing for her life."Depp had admitted long-term problems with drugs and alcohol during the trial but said the tabloid's claims that he was violent toward Heard were "completely untrue."However, Judge Andrew Nicol said in his 129-page judgment Monday that the paper's claims had been shown to be "substantially true.""I have reached these conclusions having examined in detail the 14 incidents on which the defendants rely, as well as the over-arching considerations which the claimant submitted I should take into account," the judge said.The blockbuster trial included days of tense testimony in July from Depp, Heard and several of their acquaintances, with Heard telling the court that Depp threatened to kill her "many times."In their evidence, lawyers for the publisher detailed 14 separate alleged incidents of physical abuse by Depp, which took place in Los Angeles, Tokyo, Australia, and other locations between 2013 and 2016, according to the trial judgement. Depp has denied all incidents of abuse.In the first alleged incident in early 2013 in Los Angeles, the paper's lawyers claimed that Heard laughed at something Depp had said, and the actor responded by "repeatedly slapping Ms Heard across the face," and knocking her to the floor.The lawyers said Depp told Heard "he snaps sometimes into something he called 'the monster.'"Depp's lawyers said the actor didn't recall the specific conversation with Heard but "expressly denied" ever slapping or hitting her, according to the judgement.It remains unclear how severely the trial will damage the reputation of Depp, one of Hollywood's most recognizable and bankable stars.In a statement, Depp's law firm, Schillings, indicated he would contest the ruling, saying "the judgment is so flawed that it would be ridiculous for Mr Depp not to appeal this decision."It remains unclear how severely the trial will damage the reputation of Depp, one of Hollywood's most recognizable and bankable stars.In a statement, Depp's law firm, Schillings, indicated he would contest the ruling, saying "the judgment is so flawed that it would be ridiculous for Mr Depp not to appeal this decision."The Sun, which is owned by media mogul Rupert Murdoch's News Corp., said in a statement following the verdict: "The Sun has stood up and campaigned for the victims of domestic abuse for over 20 years. Domestic abuse victims must never be silenced and we thank the judge for his careful consideration and thank Amber Heard for her courage in giving evidence to the court."Heard's lawyer added in a statement to PA Media: "For those of us present for the London High Court trial, this decision and judgment are not a surprise."2018 article prompted legal actionThe case, which hinged in part on the veracity of testimony from Heard and several people close to the couple, shed light on the stars' volatile relationship and was covered intensely by international media.It centered around a 2018 column in The Sun that criticized author JK Rowling for supporting the casting of Depp in the "Harry Potter" spin-off film "Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald," referring to the actor as a "wife beater."The column, written by Wootton, was headlined: "GO...

MLB Tuesday RESULTS! Marlins sidelined til Sunday..... Phillies til Friday..... Yanks forced to patch together series with Orioles! Houston/Dodgers bench clearing, socially distanced, brawl after "exchanged words" between Dodgers Pitcher (Kelly) and Astros hitter (Corea) USA South to delay Football/Soccer to the SPRING! Why? How? What does it mean? NCAA gives "blanket waiver" to allow teams to play on "Week 0" Why such a difference from D-1 to D-3? MONEY! 38 DAYS TIL ITS FOOTBALL TIME IN TENNESSEE! Michels, Rodgers, Schillings, and more were GREAT #38s! Who were CHAMPS in 1938? #WednesdayGRIND www.THEGRINDONSPORTS.com

Minou Schillings and Pamela Smit are The Green Sprint ladies. They utilize the power of creative thinking/design thinking for sustainable business solutions so that people can think of new ways in which they can approach sustainability. They both are ready to empower the world with their mission. We talk about how they run Green Sprints, and one of the methodologies they use called S.C.A.M.P.E.R. Such powerful tools are useful for any business that either wants to jump the sustainability train or learn about how to evolve their current sustainable process. You can find Pamela Smit and Minou Schilling on below links: https://thegreensprint.com/ https://www.linkedin.com/in/pamelasmit/ https://www.linkedin.com/in/minouschillings/

Case Eighteen. Mat Ewins sits slack jawed as Peter Dumplings blows the lid on a disastrous attempt to create a fairground of cloned dinosaurs. How would cloning dinosaurs effect your business? Usually recorded in front of a live audience this episode was taped down the line owing to a worldwide pandemic that has infected over 10.8 million people (officially). This episode is sponsored by Steve Wright, Sunday Morning Love Songs and his lawyers at Schillings who have asked us to “cease and desist”.Want to help us solve more mysteries? Support Microscope at supporter.acast.com/microscopePerformed by Mat Ewins and John Kearns.Recorded by Naomi Parnell. Edited by Mat Ewins. Additional editing by Ben Williams. Researched by John Kearns.Theme music by Nicky Green.Photography by Paul Gilbey. Artwork by Mat Ewins.Produced by Plosive Productions.Follow Microscope on Twitter for details on future live shows: @microscopefun Support this show http://supporter.acast.com/microscope. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Take 2: Let’s get personal, it’s the get to know Salena and Terry episode. We take you along the journey of our early dating days and even chat a bit on the proposal (it was pretty amazing and guess what, it involved movies). Salena and Terry discuss one of their favorite trips together to Austin, Texas and how that connected with Friday Night Lights. They also discuss what it’s been like working from home in Chicago and how their creativity and productivity have increased. The category of “Look, Don’t Look” for movie watching was introduced. Let’s see where this goes. Notable Movies and shows discussed are as follow: Project X, Friday Night Lights Tiger King, Hook, Westworld

In this day and age, crises are becoming more frequent and the impact they have on reputations are longer-lasting. Our experts explore crises from a lawyer and communicators perspective. From handling the media to analysing the pitfalls for companies, boards and individuals, preparedness is key  when protecting reputations from a crisis. The risk of a crisis can not be eliminated but preparedness and proper management can help in protecting reputations. Rachel Atkins is a partner at Schillings. A specialist in safeguarding the reputations of prominent individuals and businesses, Rachel couples her experience in media law with a detailed knowledge of reputation threats that emanate from non-media sources. With a wealth of experience in this area - from disgruntled employees to black swan. Ralph Jackson, Director and Partner at Lansons. He has over 30 years consulting experience covering reputation management, corporate crises communications, and public policy advice. His experience spans a variety of sectors including financial services, energy, pharmaceutical, chemicals, manufacturing, and retail. Tony Langham is Lansons Chief Executive and Co-Founder with over 30 years front line experience building and protecting the reputations of companies, organisations and Governments. His book, ‘Reputation Management: The Future of Corporate Communications and Public Relations' is out now and available to order from Amazon: https://amzn.to/2zjFQJa Produced and recorded by Lansons at the Lansons studio in Farrigndon, London

Jenny Afia is a privacy lawyer and a partner at the renowned law firm Schillings Partners. Her reputation is one of the most sought after privacy lawyers in the UK. She is the Head of the Legal Team at Schillings and leads its entertainment practice. In addition to being ranked as a leader in her field in Chambers & Partners, the Spear's 500 and the Spear's Reputation Management index, Jenny was Spears' Reputation and Defamation Lawyer of the Year in 2015. Jenny is a member of the Children's Commissioner's Task Force on Growing Up in the Digital Age and on the Board of the Arts Depot, an award-winning arts centre in North London. We discuss what she does and how she does it. We talk about online security for children and how big tech is complicit in making devices extremely addictive.  You can find Jenny on twitter @jennyafia or on Linkedin. We'd love our listeners to recommend people for the show so if you know anyone please do send them our way. Please do leave us a review or a rating on iTunes as these are always greatly appreciated.  We want to hear your comments feedback & suggesstions -  email us at hello@engagefs.co.uk and or check out our website www.engagefs.co.uk  

From the 1924 book Reading and Living Book 2

Tim Robinson CBE is a partner at Schillings. Prior to joining the international law firm he served in the British Army for 25 years, most recently as a major general leading troops in Bosnia, Iraq and Northern Ireland. The multidisciplinary consultancy has experts from sectors including law, intelligence and government, and protects individuals from privacy and reputational threats. In this in-depth conversation, he illustrates how skills required in a war zone such as “action-oriented” leadership, empathy and conflict resolution can be applied to the commercial environment, argues the wealthy face more scrutiny which can lead to issues such as hacking and stalking, and explains how the internet can be a double-edged sword that can be used as a tool to rectify an online crisis – or create one.

Im Rahmen des Europaschwerpunkts soll auch ein EU-Kritiker zu Wort kommen. Robert Marschall ist Gründer und Vorsitzender der EU-Austrittspartei. Wie soll Österreich ohne die EU nach vorne kommen? Darüber hinaus ist Marschall ein großer Verfechter von (mehr) direkter Demokratie: Was hat er aus acht initiierten Volksbegehren gelernt? Ein Gespräch über die Freude und Vorbildwirkung des Brexits und mehr Demokratie. Hier lesen Sie drei Stichpunkte aus dem Gespräch: Gute Ideen und schlechte Umsetzung Robert Marschall war nicht immer ein erbitterter Kämpfer gegen die Europäische Union. Bei der Volksabstimmung im Jahr 1994 über einen Beitritt Österreichs stimmte er dafür: „Hauptsächlich aus wirtschaftlichen Gründen, auch die Idee eines großen und geeinten Europas wurde uns sehr nett verkauft“. Der Bruch kam langsam, nachdem immer mehr Versprechungen gebrochen wurden. Das begann mit der Abschaffung des Schillings, ging weiter mit „scheinbarer Neutralität“ und war komplett mit der Zustimmung zur ESM-Haftung. 2011 gründete Marschall die EU-Austrittspartei. Marschall spricht immer wieder von der Wichtigkeit des Rechtsstaats als Grund. „Wenn sich Länder nicht an Gesetze halten, wozu sind wir dann überhaupt in der Union?“ Das gelte für gebrochene Maastricht-Kriterien, die u.a. Schuldenstand und Haushaltsdefizit von EU-Ländern regeln, genauso wie für den Dublin III Vertrag. Dass die Gesetzgebung im Fall der Flüchtlingswelle 2015 nicht schnell genug handeln konnte, zählt für ihn nicht: „Entweder wir passen die Gesetze an, oder wir halten uns daran“. Schweiz28 statt EU28 Es darf aber nicht beim Schimpfen bleiben, meint Marschall. „Mir schwebt ein Europa der souveränen Nationen vor. Wie macht das die Schweiz? Die verhandelt auch allein mit China“. Seine Vision geht stark von selbstbestimmenden Staaten in politischen Fragen aus, und nur einer gemeinsamen Wirtschaftspolitik. „Raus aus der EU, aber im Europäischen Wirtschaftsraum (EWR) bleiben“, schlägt er vor. Zwar sei es ihm egal, was die Union ohne Österreich tue, langfristig sieht er aber eine geplante und schrittweise Auflösung als zielführend an. Vor der eigenen Tür kehren Österreich müsse im Zuge eines EU-Austritts aber die eigene Demokratie stärken. Auch hier schwebt ihm wieder die Schweiz als Beispiel vor: „Wir müssen ja nichts neu erfinden, wir sehen wie gut das in der Schweiz funktioniert. Vierteljährliche Abstimmungen als Gegengewicht zum Parlament. Wobei ich für Österreich schon mit jährlichen Abstimmungen zufrieden wäre“. Die direkte Demokratie liegt ihm am Herzen: Im März 2019 ging sein Volksbegehren für verbindliche Volksbegehren zu Ende, mit gut 28.000 Unterschriften. Nach Abfuhren für große Volksbegehren wie Don’t Smoke mit knapp 900.000 ein aussichtloses Unterfangen. „Wie soll man die Menschen davon überzeugen, wenn diese Bundesregierung außer Wirtschaft fördern nichts tut?“ Wieso er trotzdem weitermacht? „Was gibt es für Alternativen?“. Lehren aus acht Volksbegehren Insgesamt acht Volksbegehren hat er initiiert und folgende Dinge daraus gelernt: 1. Es braucht einen guten Zeitplan. Zwei Kalenderjahre hat man Zeit um zu sammeln. Die Anfangsphase ist laut ihm entscheidend für einen Erfolg. 2. Die Themenlage und öffentliche Meinung nicht unterschätzen. Im Zuge der Klimakrise sieht er hier eine gute Ausgangsposition für „weniger Fluglärm, weg mit der dritten Piste und mehr Klimaschutz“. 3. Die Rolle der Medien sieht er kritisch: „Zur Pressekonferenz für die ersten beiden VB ist kein einziger Journalist erschienen!“. Viele Menschen auf der Straße haben sich beschwert, dass sie nichts im Fernsehen oder in der Zeitung davon gehört hätten. Soll es eine Berichterstattungspflicht geben? Von Pflicht hält Marschall wenig, aber es muss einen Weg geben, Aufmerksamkeit auf Initiativen aus der Bevölkerung zu lenken ohne große Budgets.

Prose And Doms Episode 8 - From Schillings To Dollars by Prose and Doms

We had a great time talking with Mat Barbur about everything social media! Mat shares his experiences running Schillings’ social media, starting his own social media management company called Thursday Social Co, and gives the audience an incredible amount of information on the do’s and don’ts of social media. Honestly, if you’re a business owner or a person who’s looking for tips for their own pages, then do not miss this. You rarely get this type of insight for free. AUDIO ENGINEER: JOSH VANDYKE PRODUCER: ALAN MYSZKOWSKI

Jenny Afia is a senior media and privacy lawyer, and Partner at Schillings. In this in-depth interview, she discusses balancing an open society with the individual’s right to privacy; the legal mechanics of dealing with trolls and malicious online harassment; superinjunctions and the general direction of privacy law; explains the need for proactivity and compromise when managing the media; and argues against greater press regulation, despite her “contempt” for the paparazzi and the misery they cause her celebrity clients.

  This is a Native Opinion special episode: "Washington Post is Questionable". This is a commentary provided by Michael Kickingbear which is a follow up regarding the recent article published by the Washington Post, and it's assertion that 9-10 Native Americans do not find the name of the Washington "R" NFL team offensive. We feature an audio discussion from an episode of The Young Turks (See www.tytnetwork.com) which involves the questionable practices of the Washington Post. The take away from this episode we hope is this: 1.) The Washington Post is owned by Amazon's "Jeff Bezos" who contribute millions to various Democratic causes. This is one indication as to why the Washington post is biased towards the establishment. 2.) The Poll regarding the Washington Team is in itself flawed. 45 percent of the respondents the Post states are "Enrolled" with native American tribes. But they do not state which tribes they are. The REMAINING 55 percent are what they called "Self-Identified as Native American". Well, that can be any non-native that "thinks" they are native American but aren't sure.... 3.) A poll conducted by Vince Schilling (of the St. Regis Mohawk Tribe) through his own Twitter account show results that completely reverse the findings. (Take Poll, or see it's results: http://bit.ly/1YZiDBc) Defenders of the Washington poll have tried to discredit his poll stating that it is tainted because the bulk of Schillings followers are Native American. Well, what sense does that make? The Washington Post professes that they polled native American and people who "identify" as Native American. Which would you rather have? A poll that you aren't quite sure all or most of the respondents are Native people or one where you are pretty sure are?   Resources that you can use to balance what you are hearing from non-native defenders of the poll:   https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2013/08/07/the-politics-of-jeff-bezos/ https://twitter.com/VinceSchilling http://indiancountrytodaymedianetwork.com/2016/05/20/offended-redskins-indian-country-twitter-poll-164554 http://www.tytnetwork.com http://www.indianz.com/News/2016/05/23/vincent-schilling-mascot-poll-doesnt-ref.asp https://twitter.com/blackhorse_a   TO REACH OUR SHOW: Website: http://www.nativeopinion.com Twitter: @nativeopinion Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/nativeopinion Leave us a Voice Message!: https://www.speakpipe.com/nativeopinion    

In this podcast Dr Sonja Schillings explores how the use of the Latin term Hostis Humani Generis (the enemy of all mankind), which was originally applied to pirates, now creates an extralegal space which is being used to legitimise the assassination of international terrorists all over the world. This is just part of her forthcoming book, Hostis Humani Generis and the Narrative Construction of Legitimate Violence. Podcast presented and produced by Tatiana Prorokova. Tatiana Prorokova: Hello and welcome to Pod Academy. My name is Tatiana Prorokova and I am glad to have here Dr. Sonja Schillings to discuss her forthcoming book based on her dissertation titled Hostis Humani Generis and the Narrative Construction of Legitimate Violence. Before we proceed, however, I’d like to say a couple of words about Dr. Schillings’ academic career. She wrote her dissertation at the graduate school of North-American Studies at Freie-Universität Berlin in Germany, where she also held a position of a substitute junior professor for North-American Literature in summer semester 2014. And since October 2014, she is a post-doctoral researcher at the International Graduate Center for the Study of Culture at Giessen University in Germany. So, Sonja, in your dissertation, your main concern is the relationship between two criminal groups - pirates and terrorists. You argue that both have one thing in common and that is they can be characterized as Hostis Humani Generis. Could you elaborate on that and maybe explain your choice of these particular groups? Sonja Schillings:  My basic concern is about Hostis Humani Generis.  It is a legal term of arts,  a Latin term, which means “enemy of all human kind”,. It is, quite generally, a legal fiction that is assigned to perpetrators who are considered not just enemies but enemies of the law, of the normative order.  They are enemies so hostile and so extreme that you can  commit legitimate violence against them, just because you commit it against them. And it’s a term that was traditionally,  in legal history, equivalent or synonymous with the crime of piracy. And “the enemy of all” means that everybody, without distinction, is being attacked by them. This is why violence against them is said to be representative of the entire human race.  Or rather it’s claimed to be. The claims I look at are only ever in text. So much for that. So, pirates and terrorists. As I’ve been saying, Hostis Humani Generis was originally designated to describe pirates only, until the early nineteenth century when Hostis Humani Generis and the crime of piracy separated and Hostis Humani Generis was also used to describe slave traders – international slave traders. And then later, in the twentieth century, it was also used about perpetrators of crimes against humanity - the torturer is the most established example here. And now, what we see since the 1980s, is the political initiative to describe international terrorists as pirates. It is this link that originally spurred my interest in the topic of Hostis Humani Generis because other than the fiction itself, other than , the legal description of Hostis Humani Generis, and other than the characterization of what they do to society (i.e. the orders they attack), pirates and terrorists have very little in common.  Even so, they were constantly combined or associated with each other, despite the grave reservations of the entire maritime securities community. This is what the “pirate-terrorist nexus” refers to. T.P: So, you provide a brief historical overview of this “pirates-terrorists nexus”. But can you actually spot any difference between pirates and terrorists of the twentieth and twenty-first centuries? Was there any shift after 2000/2001? S.S.: Well, yes and no. There was certainly a shift of it being more do-able – first of all that. And, second of all, you suddenly had Somali pirates, which is why maritime security became seen as piracy -  mariti...

In this conversation (February 2012), Astrid Schillings talks about “The-Whole-Body-Focusing”, the place of grounded Being, Spirituality, Mindfulness, pathways of embodiment in her life. Astrid Schillings’ bio: Focusing came into my life in 1981 when studying psychology. It resonated deeply with my wondering what it is to be human, why we are here. I have been […]