Podcast appearances and mentions of anders breivik

On July 22nd, 2011, Norwegian alt-right gamer Anders Behring Breivik carried out the deadliest attack on Norwegian soil since WW2, when he detonated a car bomb in Oslo and then snuck onto the nearby island of Utoya and opened fire on a large group of teenagers attending a political summer camp. Why did he do this? And how was no one able to stop him? Merch and more: www.badmagicproductions.com Timesuck Discord! https://discord.gg/tqzH89vWant to join the Cult of the Curious PrivateFacebook Group? Go directly to Facebook and search for "Cult of the Curious" to locate whatever happens to be our most current page :)For all merch-related questions/problems: store@badmagicproductions.com (copy and paste)Please rate and subscribe on Apple Podcasts and elsewhere and follow the suck on social media!! @timesuckpodcast on IG and http://www.facebook.com/timesuckpodcastWanna become a Space Lizard? Click here: https://www.patreon.com/timesuckpodcast.Sign up through Patreon, and for $5 a month, you get access to the entire Secret Suck catalog (295 episodes) PLUS the entire catalog of Timesuck, AD FREE. You'll also get 20% off of all regular Timesuck merch PLUS access to exclusive Space Lizard merch.

Sígeme en:  YouTube: Araknne Twitter: @Araknne1 Distribuido por: Web: Genuina Media  IG: @genuinamedia

Avec Mathias Roux, philosophe. Anders Breivik, le terroriste d'extrême droite norvégien qui a assassiné 77 jeunes en 2011 reçoit 800 lettres d’amour par mois. Il existe un joli mot pour désigner cette passion pour les criminels : “hybristophilie”. Bien sûr, on pourrait considérer ce genre d’héroïsation des tueurs comme un trouble pathologique, mais on peut aussi le voir comme la manifestation extrême d’une fascination largement partagée pour le crime.  Cette attraction repose certes en grande partie sur nos pulsions voyeuristes, mais pour le philosophe Mathias Roux, les vraies affaires criminelles représentent plus que de simples faits divers. Dans “Le goût du crime” (Actes Sud, 2023), l’essai qu’il a coécrit avec son frère Emmanuel Roux, il montre que non seulement ces affaires donnent matière à penser notre époque, mais elles soulèvent de grandes questions philosophiques. Pourquoi les affaires criminelles nous fascinent-elles ? Que nous enseigne l’événement criminel sur la question de la vérité et du mal ? Quelle est la raison du crime ? Un épisode des Idées Larges avec Mathias Roux, philosophe, et Matthieu Béra, sociologue.  Références : - Marcel Proust, "Contre Sainte-Beuve", Gallimard, 1954- Pierre Bourdieu, "Sur la télévision", Liber Éditions, 1996- Roland Barthes, "Essais critiques", Seuil, 1964- Émile Durkheim, "Les règles de la méthode sociologique", la Revue philosophique, 1894- Émile Durkheim, "Leçons de sociologie criminelle", éd. par Matthieu Béra, Flammarion, 2022 (1892-1893)- Michel Foucault, "Du gouvernement des vivants – Cours au Collège de France". 1979-1980, Gallimard, Seuil, 2012 Archives sonores : - RTL INFO - Landru, Fourniret, Dutroux, Abdeslam… ils ont tous reçus des lettres d'amour: comment expliquer cette attirance pour les criminels? - 2022- La Voix du Nord - Il y a cinquante ans éclatait l’affaire de Bruay-en-Artois - 2022- Office national de radiodiffusion télévision française (ORTF) - Meurtre de Brigitte Dewèvre à Bruay-en-Artois - 1972- Global Entertainment Productions GmbH & Company Medien KG - Kevin Bacon, Elisabeth Shue, Josh Brolin - HOLLOW MAN - 2000- AXIS TV - Colloque GYPSY XXII - Pierre-Olivier SUR : Je jure de dire la vérité... - 2022- Federation Entertainment France Télévisions Versus Production What's Up Films - Sambre - Episode 6 - Jean-Xavier de Lestrade - 2023 Musique Générique :« TRAHISON » Musique de Pascal Arbez-Nicolas © Delabel Editions, Artiste : VITALIC,(P) 2005 Citizen Records under Different Recording licence ISRC : BEP010400190,Avec l’aimable autorisation de [PIAS] et Delabel Editions.  Episode vidéo publié le 24 mai 2024 sur arte.tv Autrice Laura Raim Réalisateur Jean Baptiste Mihout Son Alban Lejeune Montage Antoine Dubois Mixage et sound design Jean-Marc Thurier Une co-production UPIAN Margaux Missika, Alexandre Brachet, Auriane Meilhon, Emma Le Jeune, Karolina Mikos avec l'aide de Nancy-Wangue Moussissa ARTE France Unité société et culture

Zahlídla jsem článek o tom, na co všechno si stěžuje Anders Breivik, který sedí ve vězení za nejhorší teroristický útok spáchaný jednotlivcem v Norsku od 2.světové války. Má prý špatný Playstation. Tak jsem se jala rekonstruovat jeho běsnění před 12 lety. Do současnýho počasí venku ideální vyprávění.

Oslo, Norvegia, 22 luglio 2011. Un uomo vestito da poliziotto sbarca sull'isola di Utøya, dove si sta svolgendo il campo estivo della gioventù laburista. In 69 minuti uccide a sangue freddo 69 persone, la maggior parte adolescenti. Poche ore prima, una bomba era esplosa nel centro di Oslo, uccidendo altre 8 persone. Dietro entrambi gli attacchi c'è un solo uomo: Anders Breivik. Ma come si è arrivati a questo punto? E perché la polizia norvegese non è riuscito a fermalo? Lo scopriremo nella seconda parte de Il Caso Breivik. Iscriviti al Patreon per ascoltare UN EPISODIO IN PIÙ a settimana: patreon.com/NAQP Seguici su Instagram per video esclusivi e molto altro: @nonapritequellapodcast Compra il nostro merch: merch.nonapritequellapodcast.com Per sponsor, collaborazioni o semplici mail: nonapritequellapodcast@gmail.com Segui Matteo su Instagram: @matteo.lenardon Segui Pedar su Instagram: @iosonopedar Segui J-Ax su Instagram: @j.axofficial Grazie ai nostri flex producer: Alessandro Micheli, Andrea Salvadori, Antonio Cassese, Baiocchi In Brodo, Bugman, Dario D'Amico, Dr. Amido Di Patata, Gamesreplay.Net, Giovanni Mazzoleni, La Ele, Mauro Zaccone, Michele Battistella, Mimmo, Nick Franco, Ric, Salvo Greg, Shedly The Mad Hatter, Svizzerotto Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Joris van Casteren schreef een boek vol zeer ongewone verhalen van ogenschijnlijk zeer gewone mensen. Allemaal maken ze de geschiedenis mee, van Vietnamoorlog tot de val van de Muur. Maar eigenlijk gaat dat allemaal langs ze heen. Hun bestaan draait om hun eigen sores en gedachtenspinsels. Van Casteren stuitte in een dagboekarchief op persoonlijke verhalen van ‘gewone' Nederlanders en tekende die op in De mensheid zal nog van mij horen. Zijn plegers van massamoorden, terroristische aanslagen en andere misdaden beangstigend normaal? Dat vraagt de Nederlandse hoogleraar Alette Smeulers zich af in haar nieuwe boek Pepretrators of Mass Atrocities. Haar verontrustende antwoord is dat dit vaak het geval is. Ze geeft een typologie van verschillende soorten daders, van Jozef Stalin tot Adolf Eichmann en Anders Breivik. Volgens Historisch Nieuwsblad-hoofdredacteur Bas Kromhout moet dit boek hoognodig in het Nederlands vertaald worden. Ze zagen zichzelf als de erfgenamen van Gods geuzen uit de Tachtigjarige Oorlog en als hoeders van het vaderland. Officieel heetten de kleine luyden van Abraham Kuyper de gereformeerden, maar ze noemden zichzelf de mannenbroeders. Ze waren overal tegen; ‘vleeschkleurige' kousen, de bioscoop en de danszaal. Recensent Wim Berkelaar bespreekt de klassieker De parade der mannenbroeders van Ben van Kaam, een boek over een welhaast uitgestorven mensensoort in Nederland.

Anders Breivik ficou conhecido em 2011 ao cometer dois ataques terroristas no mesmo dia na Noruega. Ao total foram 77 vítimas fatais.

Delaware Citizens Opposed to the Death Penalty Vice President Kristin Froehlich joins Rob in the bunker to talk about the most recent attempts to officially abolish the death penalty in Delaware, and how the morality of crime and punishment applies to the case of Anders Breivik, the far-right Norwegian terrorist.Show Notes:Delaware Citizens Opposed to the Death PenaltyThe Anders Breivik StoryHB70 and HB301

The boys conclude the story of Norwegian Mass Killer and Gold Star Loser Anders Breivik with the 2011 Norway Attacks, also known as 22 July, and the brutal massacre that injured over 300 and abruptly took the lives of 77 innocent men, women, and children.

Robert Misik im Gespräch mit Peter Neumann LOGIK DER ANGST Die FPÖ liegt in den Umfragen voran und bekundet, die Zeit „der Mäßigung“ sei vorbei; ihre Jugendorganisation wächst mit den rechtsextremen Identitären zusammen. Mit der AfD könnte in Deutschland demnächst eine „gesichert rechtsextreme“ Partei als stärkste Kraft in Landtage einziehen. Und in anderen europäischen Ländern sieht es nicht viel anders aus.Die Mordserie des NSU (2000-2006), der Terroranschlag von Anders Breivik (2011), das Attentat in München (2016), das Massaker von Christchurch (2019), der Mord an Walter Lübcke (2019), die Anschläge von Halle (2019) und Hanau (2020), zuletzt ein vereitelter Putschplan deutscher Reichsbürger (2022): Rechtsextreme Gewalt beschäftigt uns schon lange – und in den letzten Jahren besonders massiv. Im Zuge sozialer Proteste könnten extreme Gruppierungen zu einer umfassenden Bewegung zusammenfinden. Peter R. Neumann, einer der weltweit profiliertesten Experten, zeigt, wie real diese Gefahr ist – und wo ihre tieferen, ideologischen Wurzeln liegen. Statt nur einzelne Gruppen zu beschreiben, legt er das Wesen, die Logik des Rechtsextremismus frei – ebendas, was all diese Gruppen verbindet, ob Alte oder Neue Rechte, Neoreaktionäre oder Identitäre, Reichsbürger oder Verschwörungstheoretiker, AfD oder Rassemblement National. Anhand zahlreicher Beispiele, von der völkischen Bewegung im 19. Jahrhundert bis zum Populismus der Gegenwart, zeigt Neumann: Am Anfang steht nicht der Hass, sondern eine Logik der Angst. Ein Psychogramm des Rechtsextremismus – das zugleich eine dringende Warnung ist. Peter Neumann, Politikwissenschaftler, Journalist und Publizist Robert Misik, Autor und Journalist Peter R. Neumann, geboren 1974 in Würzburg, ist Professor für Sicherheitsstudien am King's College London und leitete dort lange das International Centre for the Study of Radicalisation (ICSR). Als international gefragter Experte war Neumann 2014 Berater der USA bei den Vereinten Nationen, 2017 Sonderbeauftragter der Organisation für Sicherheit und Zusammenarbeit in Europa (OSZE). Daneben schreibt er u.a. für den «Spiegel» und die «New York Times». Zuletzt erschien sein vielgelobtes Buch «Die neue Weltunordnung».

The boys dive right back into the story of Anders Breivik, his exhausting manifesto, and the final days leading up to the devastating 2011 Norway Attacks.

This week the boys take a glimpse into the early life of Norwegian neo-Nazi, Mass Killer - Anders Breivik and learn how his skewed upbringing and sense of superiority would inevitably lead him to commit the most deadly attack in Norway since WWII.

Breivik mener, at den norske stat bryder loven ved ikke at lade ham have social kontakt. Skyggesiden møder en overlevende fra Utøya, der har tilgivet ham.Værter: Janni Pedersen og Carsten NortonMedvirkende: Patrick Piscot, musikproducer og overlevende fra massakren på UtøyaLyddesign: Leo Peter LarsenRedaktør: Amanda Heiberg Boberg Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Anders Behring Breivik, es un terrorista noruego de extrema derecha​ autor de los ataques de Noruega de 2011 y culpable del asesinato de 77 personas.En la comunidad de Nithari, cerca de Nueva Delhi, los niños desaparecían a un ritmo de uno al mes durante casi dos años. Surinder Koli, un chico de pueblo con una mente depravada los había secuestrado

Nous commencerons la première partie de notre émission par une discussion sur l'actualité. Tout d'abord, nous parlerons de la formation d'un nouveau parti en Allemagne et des conséquences que cela pourrait avoir sur le paysage politique. Ensuite, nous verrons pourquoi un tueur de masse, Anders Breivik, accuse la Norvège d'avoir violé ses droits fondamentaux. L'article scientifique de la semaine sera consacré à une étude publiée dans la revue Communications Chemistry qui présente un modèle informatique permettant d'analyser la composition chimique des vins. Enfin, nous nous intéresserons à une version numérique d'Elvis Presley qui va bientôt se produire sur scène à Londres.    Nous parlerons de la fréquentation exceptionnelle des musées français en 2023. Nous discuterons pour finir de la création d'un nouveau label par un éditeur français, qui vise à certifier qu'un livre a été écrit par un humain et non par l'Intelligence artificielle. - Un nouveau parti populiste modifie le paysage politique allemand - Le tueur Anders Breivik poursuit la Norvège pour traitement inhumain - Un modèle informatique confirme les affirmations des vignerons sur les propriétés spécifiques des vins - Elvis Presley va se produire à Londres en novembre 2024 - Les musées français enregistrent un nombre record de visites - Un label pour garantir qu'un livre a été écrit par un humain

Nella prima parte del programma commenteremo due notizie di attualità. La prima riguarda la formazione di un nuovo partito politico in Germania e cercheremo di capire come questo influenzerà l'intero panorama politico. La seconda notizia, invece, ha come protagonista il pluriomicida, Anders Breivik, che ha pensato bene di fare causa alla Norvegia per violazione dei diritti umani. Nel segmento scientifico parleremo di uno studio pubblicato sulla rivista Communications Chemistry che descrive il funzionamento di un modello informatico in grado di analizzare la composizione chimica dei vini. Infine, conosceremo la versione digitale di Elvis Presley che si esibirà a Londra il prossimo autunno.    Inizieremo commentando il discorso di fine anno del Presidente della Repubblica Sergio Mattarella. Stiamo parlando di uno dei momenti più attesi dello scenario socio-politico italiano, perché riprende molti dei temi che hanno animato il dibattito pubblico nell'anno appena trascorso. Successivamente, ci occuperemo di una curiosa polemica che nelle ultime settimane ha animato il panorama della gastronomia italiana: la pizza all'ananas introdotta dalla nota pizzeria napoletana, Sorbillo. - Un nuovo partito populista cambia il panorama politico tedesco - Il pluriomicida Anders Breivik fa causa alla Norvegia per violazione dei diritti umani - Un modello computerizzato supporta le affermazioni dei viticoltori sulle proprietà uniche del vino - Elvis Presley si esibirà a Londra nel novembre 2024 - Il messaggio di fine anno di Sergio Mattarella - Scandalo e polemiche per la pizza all'ananas della pizzeria Sorbillo

Comenzamos la primera parte del programa discutiendo la actualidad. Primero hablaremos de la formación de un nuevo partido en Alemania, y de cómo podría cambiar el panorama político. Después discutiremos por qué un asesino de masas, Anders Breivik, ha puesto una demanda contra Noruega por violar sus derechos humanos. La noticia de ciencia de la semana la dedicamos a un estudio publicado en la revista Communications Chemistry, que describe un modelo computacional que analiza la composición química del vino. Y, para acabar, hablaremos de una versión digital de Elvis Presley que actuará en Londres. En la segunda parte del programa, Trending in Spain, hablaremos de dos errores monumentales. En la primera noticia, discutiremos las consecuencias de un nuevo accidente medioambiental en las costas gallegas. En la segunda noticia, comentaremos el vídeo navideño que ha enviado la administración de Madrid a las familias que lo solicitaron. En él, el rey Baltasar tiene un aspecto muy peculiar. Un nuevo partido populista cambia el panorama político alemán El asesino de masas Anders Breivik demanda a Noruega por violar sus derechos humanos Un modelo computacional apoya la afirmación de los productores de vino sobre las propiedades únicas del vino Elvis Presley actuará en Londres en noviembre de 2024 Nuevo accidente medioambiental en Galicia Un rey Baltasar muy peculiar

Wir beginnen den ersten Teil unseres Programms mit einer Diskussion über aktuelle Ereignisse. Als Erstes werden wir über die Gründung einer neuen Partei in Deutschland sprechen und darüber, wie sie die politische Landschaft verändern könnte. Anschließend diskutieren wir, warum der Massenmörder Anders Breivik Norwegen wegen der Verletzung seiner Menschenrechte verklagt. Im Wissenschaftsteil unseres Programms geht es heute um eine in der Zeitschrift Communications Chemistry veröffentlichte Studie, die ein Computermodell zur Analyse der chemischen Zusammensetzung von Weinen beschreibt. Und zum Schluss sprechen wir über den Auftritt einer digitalen Version von Elvis Presley im November in London. Weiter geht es mit dem zweiten Teil unseres Programms, „Trending in Germany“. Wir werden über die Aktion der Stadt Wiesbaden sprechen, die Anzahl von Tauben mit einem Sterilisationsprogramm zu reduzieren. Außerdem sprechen wir über eine Bewegung in Deutschland, deren Mitglieder ihre Waren nach dem Bezahlen an der Supermarktkasse bewusst sehr langsam einpacken. Aber nicht, um mehr Achtsamkeit und Ruhe in den Alltag zu bringen, sondern als Kritik am Kapitalismus. Eine neue populistische Partei verändert die politische Landschaft in Deutschland Massenmörder Anders Breivik verklagt Norwegen wegen Verletzung seiner Menschenrechte Computermodell bestätigt Aussagen von Winzern über besondere Eigenschaften ihrer Weine Auftritt von Elvis Presley im November 2024 in London Wiesbadens humaner Kampf gegen Tauben Mit Absicht langsam einpacken?

Wir beginnen den ersten Teil unseres Programms mit einer Diskussion über aktuelle Ereignisse. Als Erstes werden wir über die Gründung einer neuen Partei in Deutschland sprechen und darüber, wie sie die politische Landschaft verändern könnte. Anschließend diskutieren wir, warum der Massenmörder Anders Breivik Norwegen wegen der Verletzung seiner Menschenrechte verklagt. Im Wissenschaftsteil unseres Programms geht es heute um eine in der Zeitschrift Communications Chemistry veröffentlichte Studie, die ein Computermodell zur Analyse der chemischen Zusammensetzung von Weinen beschreibt. Und zum Schluss sprechen wir über den Auftritt einer digitalen Version von Elvis Presley im November in London. Weiter geht es mit dem zweiten Teil unseres Programms, „Trending in Germany“. Wir werden über die Aktion der Stadt Wiesbaden sprechen, die Anzahl von Tauben mit einem Sterilisationsprogramm zu reduzieren. Außerdem sprechen wir über eine Bewegung in Deutschland, deren Mitglieder ihre Waren nach dem Bezahlen an der Supermarktkasse bewusst sehr langsam einpacken. Aber nicht, um mehr Achtsamkeit und Ruhe in den Alltag zu bringen, sondern als Kritik am Kapitalismus. Eine neue populistische Partei verändert die politische Landschaft in Deutschland Massenmörder Anders Breivik verklagt Norwegen wegen Verletzung seiner Menschenrechte Computermodell bestätigt Aussagen von Winzern über besondere Eigenschaften ihrer Weine Auftritt von Elvis Presley im November 2024 in London Wiesbadens humaner Kampf gegen Tauben Mit Absicht langsam einpacken?

An Anders Breivik appeal Norway's mass murderer wants more freedom. A faulty lunar probe the moon mission won't be going to the moon.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

An Anders Breivik appeal Norway's mass murderer wants more freedom. A faulty lunar probe the moon mission won't be going to the moon.  See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

An Anders Breivik appeal Norway's mass murderer wants more freedom. A faulty lunar probe the moon mission won't be going to the moon.  See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Facts & Spins for January 09, 2024 Top Stories: Congressional negotiators agree to a $1.6T 2024 spending cap, NASA's first moonlander launch in decades suffers a rocky start, the US grounds Boeing 737s after a door falls off mid-flight, German football start Franz Beckenbauer dies aged 78, Bangladesh's Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina is re-elected, Antony Blinken meets with Middle Eastern leaders, multiple explosions rock Ukraine following renewed Russian attacks, SCOTUS rejects X's challenge to disclose surveillance requests, Lloyd Austin faces scrutiny over a secretive hospital stay and mass killer Anders Breivik sues Norway over his prison isolation. Sources: https://www.verity.news/

durée : 00:02:09 - Le monde est à nous - En 2011, ce néonazi a abattu 69 personnes sur l'île norvégienne d'Utoya. Condamné à 21 ans de prison, il n'a reçu aucune visite depuis 12 ans, ses avocats dénoncent des conditions d'incarcération "inhumaines et dégradantes".

Today's West Coast Cookbook & Speakeasy Podcast for our especially special Daily Special, River City Hash Mondays is now available on the Spreaker Player!Starting off in the Bistro Cafe, a series of upcoming bombshell court decisions could signal disaster for the Republican party.Then, on the rest of the menu, right wing election integrity activists want a federal judge to rule that Georgia's use of Dominion Voting machines is unconstitutional; at Florida's only public historically Black university, students and faculty fear DeSantis' new “anti-woke” laws will censor race education; and, the Alaska Airlines in-flight emergency is almost an exact repeat of what happened to a Boeing flight from Arizona to California in 2011.After the break, we move to the Chef's Table where Anders Breivik, the Norwegian right-wing extremist who killed seventy-seven young people in a bomb and gun rampage in 2011, will try for a second time to sue the Norwegian state for allegedly breaching his human rights; and, after a sixteen-year restoration, Greece has unveiled the palace where Alexander the Great became king.All that and more, on West Coast Cookbook & Speakeasy with Chef de Cuisine Justice Putnam.Bon Appétit!The Netroots Radio Live Player​Keep Your Resistance Radio Beaming 24/7/365!"I was never a spy. I was with the OSS organization. We had a number of women, but we were all office help."-- Julia ChildBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/show/west-coast-cookbook-speakeasy/support.

Anders Breivik wordt al elf jaar alleen opgesloten, apart van andere gevangenen. Hij is van mening dat dit een schending is van zijn mensenrechten. De massa moordenaar, neo-nazi en terrorist zit al elf jaar opgesloten, afgescheiden van andere gedetineerden. Dat isolement is in strijd met de Europese Conventie van Mensenrechten, klaagde zijn advocaat in augustus vorig jaar. In 2016 klaagde Breivik de staat al eens aan over zijn detentievoorwaarden. Toen verloor hij. Maar hoe zit dat met detentierecht? Hoeveel recht heeft een gedetineerde? En waar heb je recht op? Te gast: Strafrechtadvocaat Zahra Boufadiss

Na ostrově Utøya, kde Anders Breivik 22. července 2011 postřílel 69 lidí v průměrném věku 20 let, se znovu pořádají tábory. Ve veřejném prostoru kolem norských institucí přibyla ostraha. Každý třetí Nor zná osobně někoho, kdo byl zasažen útokem ultrapravicového teroristy. Vyrovnávání se s kolektivním i osobním traumatem zachytil Lukáš Houdek ve své nové podcastové sérii.

Ma usun, et see lugu on tuttav kõigile. Norras aastal 2011 toimunud terroriakt raputas korralikult kogu riiki, kogu Euroopat. Esimeses osas räägin detailselt terroriaktist. Millise sihikindluse ja stoilise rahuga Anders Breivik oma operatsiooni läbi viis. Teises osas võtan ma Breiviku isiku ette, et vähekenegi mõista, mis teda sellise laiaulatusliku teoni viis.Head kuulamist!Siin saab mulle motivatsioonisüsti anda:https://www.buymeacoffee.com/kurjategijajakaristus?fbclid=PAAabGL1LUeNVJ6uAlp-wz-8ehUzS6lpw70F3lyWb86dtM3q2HPDvOG9qWDvc_aem_AQ0Hqi-4f5_zI_1RoXQmSi44vbSx2VeH8hUJc7ZkO3OlNqD6_2JSu1SianMRFFvsBSo Instagram: @kurjategijajakaristus_podcast E-mail: kurjategijajakaristus@gmail.com Muusika: zapsplat

Ma usun, et see lugu on tuttav kõigile. Norras aastal 2011 toimunud terroriakt raputas korralikult kogu riiki, kogu Euroopat. Esimeses osas räägin detailselt terroriaktist. Millise sihikindluse ja stoilise rahuga Anders Breivik oma operatsiooni läbi viis. Teises osas võtan ma Breiviku isiku ette, et vähekenegi mõista, mis teda sellise laiaulatusliku teoni viis.Head kuulamist!Siin saab mulle motivatsioonisüsti anda:https://www.buymeacoffee.com/kurjategijajakaristus?fbclid=PAAabGL1LUeNVJ6uAlp-wz-8ehUzS6lpw70F3lyWb86dtM3q2HPDvOG9qWDvc_aem_AQ0Hqi-4f5_zI_1RoXQmSi44vbSx2VeH8hUJc7ZkO3OlNqD6_2JSu1SianMRFFvsBSo Instagram: @kurjategijajakaristus_podcast E-mail: kurjategijajakaristus@gmail.com Muusika: zapsplat

We are joined by Bjørn Ihler from Glitterpill and the Khalifa-Ihler Institute to discuss how to promote peace and inclusivity in our communities, and how to reach people with an alternative to hate.Find this episode on your favorite podcast player here: https://pod.link/1647010767/Here are some of the sources and references we used to create this episode:The Khalifa Ihler Institutehttps://www.khalifaihler.orgGlitterpill, "The Counter Terrorism Company"https://www.glitterpill.ioBjørn Magnus Jacobsen Ihler - The Forgiveness Projecthttps://www.theforgivenessproject.com/stories-library/bjorn-magnus-jacobsen-ihler/I Survived a Far Right Terror Attack in 2011. Here's What We're Still Getting Wrong About Extremismhttps://time.com/5552534/new-zealand-utoya-far-right-extremism/Mass killer Anders Breivik threatens hunger strike for better video games, end of "torture"https://www.euronews.com/2014/02/14/far-right-terrorist-breivik-threatens-hunger-strike-for-better-video-games-end-#:~:text=Breivik%20requests%20the%20Playstation%202,35%2Dyear%2Dold%20wrote.Email us: didnothingwrongpod@protonmail.com This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.didnothingwrongpod.com/subscribe

It's been just over two years since four members of the Afzaal family were killed after a truck drove into them on a summer evening in London, Ontario. Now, 22-year-old Nathaniel Veltman is on trial for four counts of first-degree murder, one count of attempted murder and terrorism charges for what prosecutors are calling an attack motivated by “white nationalism”. An earlier version of this episode incorrectly stated that Anders Breivik killed 77 people in Norway in 2021. That date is incorrect. The killings happened in 2011. So far, the jury has heard testimonies from the detective that interviewed him, arresting officers, audio of the 911 call and have seen footage Veltman's statements to police hours after the attack. Kate Dubinski of CBC London takes us through the details of the trial, what members of the Muslim community are saying about the case and the impact it could have on the country's terrorism laws.

Kristian Lundø Laursen var 18 år gammel, da han var på sommerlejr på Utøya i Norge den 22. juli 2011. Det var et fantastisk arrangement, øen summede af forventning, og Kristian var afsted med flere gode venner og bekendte. I dette særafsnit fortæller han om, hvad der skete, efter at de første skud pludselig brød al fryd og fred. Anders Breivik var gået i land, og i mere end en time skød han koldt og målrettet så mange som muligt. Kristian forklarer, hvordan minutterne forløb for ham og de andre unge mennesker, han gemte sig for Breivik og kuglerne sammen med, og så fortæller han om den svære tid i dagene og årene efter, hvor han både kæmpede med PTSD og skyldfølelse, og en gevaldig nedtur ramte. Vi taler også om hans syn på Anders Breivik i dag, om straf, tilgivelse og retsfølelse, og om hvorfor det stadig er vigtigt at huske historien, selvom den er så umådeligt barsk. Assisterende klip: Anders Eske Musik: Bensound.com

IT'S A REQUEST!!! AGAIN! Hey, everyone! This week, Kenna brings you a case from Norway that was requested by one of our lovely listeners. This case is wild from the start, with Anders experiencing a horrible childhood with nobody being willing to help remove him from his abuser. Join us as we talk through his life, crimes, and many diagnoses.Check out diagnosingakiller.com for awesome merch! :)Support the show by joining our Patreon!Interested in some feel good products? Check out Trusted Health Products! https://www.pntra.com/t/3-297319-293495-241701How about some Coffee Bean and Tea Leaf discounts? -> https://www.pntrs.com/t/3-297358-293495-145574We love you, YOU ARE NOT ALONE!!! National Suicide Prevention Lifeline: (800) 273-8255The Trevor Project: (212) 695-8650 https://www.thetrevorproject.org

Oslo, Norvège, vendredi 22 juillet 2011. Il est 15h10. Dans le quartier d'affaires de la capitale, les employés s'apprêtent à quitter les bureaux pour le week-end. En Norvège, on arrête de travailler à 16H. Et parfois, le vendredi, un peu plus tôt.Le ciel est couvert, mais l'air est chaud. Une journée d'été typique dans ce pays du grand nord.Une camionnette se gare aux pieds de la tour qui abrite le siège du Premier ministre, le travailliste Jens Stoltenberg, Au volant, de la camionnette, Anders Breivik. 32 ans. Chevelure blonde mi-longue, yeux bleu clair.  À l'arrière du véhicule, une bombe artisanale d'1 tonne qu'il a confectionnée, seul.  Car aujourd'hui, Anders Breivik a prévu de tuer.Tuer beaucoup…Un massacre.Texte : Laurent LatappyVoix : Marie ZidiEncore plus de Podcast à écouter ici sur PODCAST STORY

Die heutige Folge ist die Fortsetzung des letzten Täterprofils zu einem Mann, der die ganze Welt schockierte: Anders Behring Breivik. Der Mann, der am 22. Juli 2011 77 Menschen tötete, davon 69 auf der Insel Utøya bei Oslo in Norwegen, wo gerade ein Sommercamp für Jugendliche stattfand. Wie so viele vor uns haben nun auch wir uns gefragt: Wieso? Was treibt einen Menschen an, so viele unschuldige Mitmenschen zu töten, kaltblütig zu ermorden? Was steckt hinter all dem Hass, den Anders Behring Breivik in sich trug und vermutlich immer noch trägt? In diesem zweiten Teil der Doppelfolge zu der Psychologie des Anders Breivik schauen wir uns ganz genau die Tat, den Gerichtsprozess, die Inhalte seines Manifests und die Aussagen und Diagnosen der Gutachter an. Wir fragen uns: war Anders Breivik krank? War er zurechnungsfähig? Oder waren all diese radikalen Überzeugungen und die daraus resultierende Tat doch Teile einer Psychose? Wie immer bitten wir euch auch heute darum, auf euch und eure Emotionen zu achten. Sollte es zu viel werden, schaltet die Folge besser ab. Liebe Grüße und einen schönen Sonntag euch, Maxi & Babsy

Es ist Sonntag - und mal wieder Zeit für ein Täterprofil. Eines wurde sowohl in der Umfrage auf Patreon als auch in einigen Nachrichten mehrfach von euch gewünscht und angefragt: Anders Behring Breivik. Der Mann, der am 22. Juli 2011 77 Menschen tötete, davon 69 auf der Insel Utøya bei Oslo in Norwegen, wo gerade ein Sommercamp für Jugendliche stattfand. Wie so viele vor uns haben nun auch wir uns gefragt: Wieso? Was treibt einen Menschen an, so viele unschuldige Mitmenschen zu töten, kaltblütig zu ermorden? Was steckt hinter all dem Hass, den Anders Behring Breivik in sich trug und vermutlich immer noch trägt? In diesem ersten Teil der Doppelfolge zu der Psychologie des Anders Breivik schauen wir uns ganz genau die Biografie, besonders die Kindheit des Täters an. Auch die Geschichte seiner Familie, genauer gesagt die seiner Mutter, und die besondere Beziehung zu ihr spielt dabei für uns eine zentrale Rolle. Wie immer bitten wir euch auch heute darum, auf euch und eure Emotionen zu achten. Sollte es zu viel werden, schaltet die Folge besser ab. Alles Liebe, Maxi & Babsy

On a summer's day in July 2011, Oslo was subjected to two horrific terror attacks, acts of mass murder, perpetrated by one man – someone who believed in male superiority, Christian fundamentalism and a white Europe, and who was vehemently opposed to the Labour government's stance on immigration and multiculturalism. It was the worst attack on Norwegian soil since the Second World War and claimed the lives of 77 people – many of them teenagers. This is what happens when nature and nurture creates a monster without empathy or remorse. This is the case of Anders Breivik,

Tanja erzählt von Elisabeth die direkt aus ihrem Kinderzimmer entführt wurde, wird sie überleben? Matze erzählt von Anders Breivik, der mehr als 70 Menschen tötete.., darunter fast nur Jugendliche. Triggerwarnung: Generell haben unsere Folgen immer etwas von Gewalt im Detail. Jeder kann sich von der erzählten Abfolge getriggert fühlen. HörerInnen die bereits Gewalt am eigenen Körper erfahren haben, raten wir vom hören unserer Folgen ab!

Nos siga lá no youtube para vídeos mais recentes, com a qualidade que você merece e não esqueça de dar uma olhadinha na nossa Lolja: https://bio.link/cdossos

➡ Reminder: I will be writing much less frequently and much shorter in November — and November only. So for this month, I have paused payment from paid subscribers.Also, I'm making all new content free without a paywall. In December, however, everything will be back to normal: typically three meaty essays and two enlightening Q&As a week, along with a pro-progress podcast like this one several times a month (including transcript). And, of course, a weekly recap over the weekends.Melior Mundus“Generations of people throughout the world have been taught to believe that there is an inverse relationship between population growth and the availability of resources, which is to say that as the population grows, resources become more scarce.” That's how Marian Tupy and Gale Pooley open their new book, Superabundance: The Story of Population Growth, Innovation, and Human Flourishing on an Infinitely Bountiful Planet. It's also the central premise of much of today's Down Wing, zero-sum thinking. And it happens to be wrong. Tupy and Pooley:It is free people, not machines or deities, who generate new ideas, and it is free people who test those new ideas against other people's ideas in the marketplace. The process of knowledge and value creation is at the heart of humanity's moral and material progress. It is what enables our civilization to bend towards goodness and superabundance.What is superabundance? The authors again: “[A]bundance occurs when the nominal hourly income increases faster than the nominal price of a resource,” meaning resources become cheaper (more abundant!) in real terms. Superabundance occurs “when the abundance of resources grows at a faster rate than population increases.” And that's exactly what we see in the world today.Cato Institute senior fellow and HumanProgress.org editor Marian Tupy joins me in this episode of Faster, Please! — The Podcast to discuss superabundance, Hollywood's Malthusianism, and more.In This Episode* Will we ever run out of Earth? (1:33)* Can our planet sustain billions of people living like Americans? (5:13)* The burden of proof is on the doomsayers (12:12)* The more people, the better (18:04)Below is an edited transcript of our conversation.Will we ever run out of Earth?James Pethokoukis: There's only so much Earth, so eventually, aren't we going to run out of Earth and its bounty?Marian Tupy: It's certainly true that the Earth has a finite number of atoms, but the amount of value that we can get from those atoms is basically infinite. Look at something as simple as sand that has been on Earth for billions of years. At some point thousands of years ago, people realize that they could turn sand into glass jars and later into windows. And now we are using sand in order to create fiber optic cables, which are carrying information around the world at very high speeds and a lot of volume in order to power our civilization's communication networks. So from something as simple as a grain of sand, you can get ever more value.If you are somebody who thinks economic growth is a good thing, who wants the global economy to keep growing—and, gee, it'd be great if it grew even faster—at some point it's going to hit a limit. Aren't we already seeing that with lithium shortages? I hear that lithium shortages are going to slow the green transition. So aren't people who are pro-growth, pro-progress, or pro-abundance—even pro-superabundance—isn't that just kind of a temporary state and eventually, I don't know, 50 years, 100, that's not a tenable position over the really long, long run?No, because knowledge continues to expand. As long as we have more people on Earth, and hopefully one day in cooperation with AI or advanced computing, we'll be able to create evermore knowledge. And it is that knowledge which allows us to get around problems of scarcity. Lithium is a perfect example. Lithium-ion batteries are a massive advance in terms of storage of electricity. But who is to say whether batteries in the future will be powered by lithium? Maybe we'll come up with a different compound, which will allow us to store energy at a much cheaper price. In fact, people are already working on basically creating batteries out of, not lithium-ion, but sodium-ion, which apparently is going to last even longer and will be massively cheaper. So it's not only a question of efficiency gains—instead of using three ounces of tin or aluminum for a can of Coke, you are now using only half an ounce—and it's not just about technological breakthroughs like, for example, GMO foods so that you can increase the yield of plants for an acre of land; it's also about substitution. This is very important. It's about substitution. You are using something in order to get to a certain goal, but you may realize 10 years, 100 years from now that you don't actually need it, that you need something completely different. And humanity has been through this very often. Two-hundred years ago, the great discovery was of course coal and steam. And people immediately started wondering, what is going to happen by the year 1900 or 1950 when we are all going to run out of coal? And then oil and gas came on board and displaced coal to a great extent. So substitution will play its role, and lithium is not going to be a problem.Can our planet sustain billions of people living like Americans?There was certainly a time where people were—and some people still are—worried very much about overpopulation. This really became a thing in the early 1970s, where we worried that we had too many people. We were worried about natural resource constraints. We were going to be running out of oil and just about everything else. How much is your thesis is based on the idea that global population will continue to grow to maybe 10 or 11 billion and then it stops? Would you still have this thesis if we were going to have a population of 30 billion people, all of whom would like to live like Americans do today, if not better? Is the idea of a constrained population key to this forecast?You started by pointing to the 1970s, and whilst it is true that many academics have departed from the basic Malthusian premise that more people will lead to an exhaustion of resources, what we found writing this book was very disturbing, which is that Malthusian ideas are much more widespread than we originally thought amongst the common public, amongst the ordinary people. In fact, as far as we can tell, a disproportionate number of mass shooters in America and also around the world, especially in developed countries, have been people driven by Malthusian ideas. This goes back to Anders Breivik in Norway, then the guy called Tarrant in New Zealand, all the way to the mass shooters in the United States, the guy who killed 22 people in El Paso in Walmart a couple of years ago—all of these people have been driven by the notion that there are far too many people in the world using far too many resources. The Malthusian notions are still very much present. You can also get them from multi-national organizations like the United Nations. You have these websites like the Overshoot Day and things like that still. So people still buy into it, and that's deeply worrying because obviously we think that population growth is…Overshoot, meaning that we're overshooting the capacity of our resources and that for everyone to live like Americans, we would need 10 Earths—and obviously we don't have 10 Earths.The current calculations say that we are already using 1.7 planets in order to maintain our standards of living, which is ridiculous because we still only have one planet. How can we already be using 1.7 planets? It doesn't make any sense.Wouldn't they say this isn't sustainable? People who are very worried about running out of everything, when they talk about growth, it's never just growth, it's “sustainable growth.” What they mean is sustainable environmentally.And when it comes to that, then of course we have to ask, how would this unsustainability present itself in the real world? People are living longer. People are living richer lives. The very fact that longevity had been expanding until COVID suggests that we are also living healthier lives. We are better fed. And not just that: As countries become richer, they have much more money to spend on environmental protection. The extraordinary lengths that Western societies go through in order to protect their oceans and their land and their biomass and biodiversity—nothing like this has been done by humans before. Where is this apocalypse going to come from? Another way of looking at it is the question of existential threat. Well, existential threat to whom? Existential threat to humanity? But how are we going to measure it? The only way we can measure it is by looking at how many people a year are dying due to extreme weather. And that particular statistic has been reduced by 99.8 percent over the last 100 years. So even though the language of the extreme environmentalist movement is getting more and more apocalyptic, the number of people who are dying due to extreme weather is continuing to collapse.Let me ask that question in a simpler way: Do we have the ability, do we have the resources, for everyone on this planet to have at least the standard of living as Americans and Western Europeans do today? Can we do that? That's the response I often get on social media: They'll say that we cannot afford to have eight billion people living the way 300 million Americans do. Is that possible?If the basic premise of the book is correct, then yes, not just for eight billion, but potentially substantially more for the following reason: Ideas are not constrained by the laws of physics. Yes, the planets, atoms are constrained by the laws of physics, but not the ideas produced by the human brain. So long as you have more people living in freedom, communicating together, exchanging ideas—in the words of Matt Ridley, “ideas having sex”—then you can always come up with a solution to shortages, which would be, in that case, temporary, driving up prices, therefore incentivizing people to look for solutions. The essence of the book is, there are no physical limits to abundance; and therefore, it should be possible for the world to have the living standards of Americans.Is this a faith-based premise, based on a fairly short period in human existence? That you're assuming that we can still do it, that humanity is ingenious enough that we can continue to be more efficient and come up with new ways of doing things infinitely?Is it faith-based? Thomas Sowell has that great quote that the caveman had exactly the same amount of resources that we have in the world today. And the difference between their standard of living and our standard of living is the knowledge that we bring to bear onto the resources that we have. In fact, you might argue that the only reason why any resources are valuable is because of the ability of human beings to interact with them and produce value out of them. If you think about the immense difference between our standards of living and those of people in the Stone Age—again, the resources haven't gone anywhere, they're still with us; except for a few tons of metal that we have shot into space, everything else is still here: the same amount of copper, the same amount of iron—there is no reason to think that people 200 years from now who are much richer than us couldn't utilize those resources in a similarly beneficial fashion.The burden of proof is on the doomsayersLet me ask you this: Who should the burden of proof be on? People who are worried about the sustainability of growth, who think there's no way this Earth can tolerate eight or 10 billion people living like Western Europeans: Should the burden of proof be on them, or should the burden of proof be on you to say that, yes, we've done it in the past and we can continue to do it in the future?I think the burden should be on them in the following sense: This is not the first time that this particular concept has been proposed. The famous wager between Simon and Ehrlich was essentially…Explain that wager just very briefly for people. What is that wager?Paul Ehrlich is the famous biologist from Stanford University. He wrote the 1968 Population Bomb book, which became an international bestseller. He was on Johnny Carson's show like 20 times, scared and scarred generations of Americans into believing that the world was going to end because of lack of natural resources. In fact, it was based on his work that you've got Soylent Green, the famous 1973 movie with Charlton Heston. And that movie basically culminates in 2022—it's this year that the movie is supposed to happen. And of course, we never got anything like that. On the East Coast, Julian Simon at the University of Maryland basically challenged him to a bet. He said, “Look, Ehrlich, you pick any commodities you want and a time period of more than a year. We are going to put $1000 on it, and if the prices go up whilst the population expands, I'm going to pay you. If the prices go down, then you pay me.” And in fact, Ehrlich lost that bet and had to write Simon a check for $576. These believers in the apocalypse have been at this for so long that I feel that it's time for them to start convincing us that the apocalypse is coming, rather than us trying to remind them of all the previous predictions of apocalypse which didn't come true. I'm willing to go and do a bet like that.The other thing that you ask is, is this possible? Is it feasible for us to continue like that? I believe that it is feasible so long as we have at least part of the world that is still free economically and politically. I don't think that we can expect cutting-edge research from China, which is increasingly restrained politically and economically where people are not free to speak, interact with ideas. But so long as we are free in Western countries, be it the United States or some other country if freedom of speech comes to an end here, then we can still produce research, we can still produce progress. But of course, my belief, part of the book, is that the more people who are free, the better. It's not just about population, it's population times freedom. Freedom is incredibly important. China has been the most populous country for a very long time, but they were dirt poor until they started liberalizing. So the freedom component is very important.Why is this belief so persistent? I still hear people who still think that we are headed toward a population of 30 billion, who think that's a big issue, who are very surprised to learn that there are countries where if the population isn't already shrinking, it's very close. Do we naturally want to believe these kinds of stories? Was Julian Simon ever on the Tonight Show with Johnny Carson?No, of course not. He never got any professional award in his entire life. And you are right to say that there was always an opposition to these Malthusian thoughts. Shortly after Malthus died, there was a big debate in Britain over who was right. Then they revisited the whole concept of shortage of natural resources in the late 19th century. So it goes through ups and downs.But there's something in that story. Have we identified what that is?There's something in that story, and the big question is what it is. I think that this particular problem could have many fathers, so to speak. One of them is that people have been traditionally not numerate. And we have a problem with the notion of exponential growth and compounding. Paul Romer put his finger on it, and that is that ideas do not add up; they multiply. And so he's got that famous example of the periodic table. Once you start interacting with compounds consisting of 10 elements on the periodic table, which has 100 elements in it, you're talking about more possible combinations, more possible calculations, more possible recipes for future progress, than there are number of seconds since the beginning of the Big Bang, 14.5 billion years ago. There's just so much knowledge which can still be discovered. We have only scratched the surface of knowledge. I think that's part of the reason why people are so pessimistic: They do not understand the potential for creation of new knowledge. The other reason, probably, is that the world really is finite. That is absolutely true. It's also irrelevant, because it's what you do with those resources that matters. As I've mentioned with the example of sand and fibers, you can use resources in evermore valuable ways.The more people, the betterI know this isn't key to your thesis, but we do live in a universe. So if you say, “Maybe you're right today, but in 1000 years you'll be wrong.” Well, a lot can happen in 1000 years. If I'm betting on 1000 years, I would also guess that if we somehow hit some constraint here on Earth, we have a whole universe of stuff that we could draw upon.Well, absolutely. Can you imagine, if wealth continues to expand at the current rate, what sort of species we would encounter in 1000 years and their technological abilities?A lot of asteroids out there!What worries me is actually that there won't be enough people to explore all those possible avenues for creation of new knowledge. You mentioned population growth: Population is below replacement level in 170 countries out of 190. We are going to peak in 2060 and then start declining. Instead of worrying about 30 billion people, we are going to have to worry about a population that is going to be basically as big in 2100 as it is today. And that really constrains the knowledge horizon and how fast we get there. And that brings with it all sorts of other problems. When people say—and I was actually speaking to somebody yesterday about this—that perhaps we have enough wealth, I cannot help but think, imagine all the possible problems that we could encounter in the future, all the other existential threats: be it asteroids, or a new pathogen, or something like that. I want our society to be super rich so that if we need to shut down the economy for another year, we can afford to do so rather than do it with that. Or if we do encounter an asteroid that's hurling towards Earth, we have a super powerful laser powered by mega fusion power stations that can blast it out of the sky. We never know what the future is going to hold, but I would much rather have a wealthier society deal with it than a poorer and more technologically primitive society dealing with it.Despite the fact that these predictions that were made a half century ago have not panned out, that these bets have been lost, if there's any example of the continued power of this idea, it's really the movie Avengers and the Infinity War series. The key villain, Thanos—and this is a multi-billion-dollar franchise—and his entire plot is to kill half of all life everywhere in the universe because we're running out of space. Apparently plenty of people signed off on the idea and said, “Yes, the audience will accept that.” And the audience did accept that.In the book we talk about that movie, and I think that one in five Americans saw it. But it was just one of the movies made based on Malthusian principles. There was Kingsman and there was also Inferno, and they were all based on Malthusian ideas.I believe that one of the James Bond films was based on the peak oil theory, too. I would doubt that there was anyone at a Hollywood studio who said “This is an absurd idea.”I don't know whether you would call it genetic or cultural, but this notion of limits must be deeply embedded in our psyche. And the key to breaking with that thinking has to be the embrace of knowledge, understanding that knowledge can solve all of our problems. Just about everything that you see around you in the world today that you bemoan is due to lack of knowledge. People are dying of cancer because of lack of knowledge. Babies are dying in Africa from malaria because of lack of knowledge, although that's being fixed already by vaccines. The more knowledge, the better. Currently it's only the human mind that is capable of producing new knowledge, so we still need people. Maybe at some point in the future we are going to have a super smart AI that is going to produce its own new knowledge. But right now that's not a realistic option. I think that there is something to be said for population growth. Now, what we are certainly not suggesting is that people should be forced to have more babies. The book's goal…Are there people who suggested that's what you're saying?I hope not. That's certainly not something. The goal of the book is much less ambitious. The goal of the book is to say to all those parents around the world who are worried about bringing a new child into the world because it'll be a drag on resources, because it'll be a cancer on the planet: You don't have to worry about that. Your child has the potential of contributing to the scope and stock of human knowledge. We are basically just tackling one aspect of this anti-nativist, anti-natalist, and anti-humanist worldview, which is the issue with resources. If we can convince people that it's still okay to have children, the question famously posed by Alexandria Ocasio Cortez, then we will have done something good. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit fasterplease.substack.com/subscribe

Une journée d'horreur en Norvège. Le 22 juillet 2011, un attentat a lieu à Oslo : une explosion tue huit personnes. Derrière cet acte se cache Anders Breivik, un militant d'extrême droite. Ce dernier prend ensuite la fuite vers l'île d'Utoya. Une fois sur place, le terroriste ouvre le feu pendant 72 minutes. Au total, ce sont 69 personnes, pour la plupart âgées entre 14 et 25 ans, qui seront abattues.

Þessi þáttur tengist þættinum um hryðjuverkin í Útey.Hér er farið yfir skýrslur geðlækna og sálfræðinga um Anders Breivik, hryðjuverkamanninn sem drap 77 einstaklinga, mest unglinga. Er Breivik geðveikur? Er hann ósakhæfur? Er hann bara vondur?Þetta er aukaþáttur fyrir áskrifendur Poppsálarinnar. Hægt er að gerast áskrifandi og nálgast fleiri aukaþætti hér: https://www.patreon.com/Poppsalin

11 ár eru frá hryðjuverkunum í Noregi þar sem Anders Breivík drap 77 einstaklinga, mest unglinga. Í þessum þætti verður sögð  ótrúleg saga eins eftirlifanda, Adrian Pracon. Hægt er að nálgast aukaþátt um hryðjuverkamanninn Anders Breivík á Patreon. https://www.patreon.com/Poppsalin

Traits of the Active shooter 18-22 years old #ActiveShooter #MassShootings #HighlandPark #Shooter Traits of the Active shooter 18-22 years old #ActiveShooter #MassShootings #HighlandPark #ShooterMass shootings have increased significantly in the United States, according to the most recent data available from the FBI. Statistics show that from 2000 to 2007, mass shooting incidents averaged 6.4 incidents annually, while from 2008 to 2013, they increased to 16.4. As a result of this increase, several studies have looked at the individual motivations and psychological “micro-foundations” that drive targeted violence–everything from video games to religious beliefs–in an effort to help law enforcement officials understand mass shooting, hate crimes, terrorism, and violence not only in the United States but also abroad. A 2015 study published in Behavioral Sciences and the Law, “The Concept of Identification in Threat Assessment,” examines the relationship between psychological “identification”–or the process by which an unstable person subsumes his or her own identity and models themselves after a violent aggressor–and acts of targeted violence. The researchers are based at the University of California-San Diego and the State University of New York Upstate Medical University as well as the San Diego Psychoanalytic Center, the firm Operational Consulting International and the Institute of Psychology and Threat Management in Germany. The authors drew on information from reviews and indirect assessment of evidence of criminal cases, as well as consultation with psychiatrists, psychologists and judicial officials who had direct access to primary investigative evidence on the cases. They also examined four detailed case studies on perpetrators of targeted violence: Antares Wong, Seung-Hui Cho, Joseph Paul Franklin and Anders Breivik. In analyzing the psychology of the four “active shooters,” the study authors drew on the work of psychiatrists Sigmund and Anna Freud and Erik Erikson on psychosocial development. The study's findings include: The four perpetrators committed different acts of targeted violence, at different points in time, killing and injuring innocent people in the United States and abroad. Despite their differences, they all evidenced common expressions of “identification.” “In the context of threat assessment, identity becomes embedded in aggressive identifications, if not extremely violent images of the self in action, most often apparent in the fantasies of the young adult as a perpetrator of homicide against another.” Identification is characterized by one or more of five characteristics: pseudo-commando, warrior mentality, close association with weapons or other law-enforcement/military paraphernalia, identification with other attackers/assassins, and becoming an agent to advance a particular cause or belief system. Authors identified eight warning behaviors, including: Pathway warning behavior: research, planning, preparation, or implementation of an attack Fixation warning behavior: an increasingly pathological preoccupation with a person or a cause Identification warning behavior: a psychological desire to be a “pseudo-commando,” have a “warrior mentality,” closely associate with weapons or other military or law enforcement paraphernalia Novel aggression warning behavior: an act of violence that appears unrelated to any targeted violence pathway behavior which is committed for the first time Energy burst warning behavior: an increase in the frequency or variety of any noted activities related to the target Leakage warning behavior: the communication to a third party of intent to do harm to a target through an attack Last resort warning behavior: evidence of a violent “action/time imperative” Directly communicated threat warning behavior: the communication of a direct threat to the target or to law enforcement before at attack.

Part 2 of 4. Personality disorders: dimensional vs categorical. Biology and mental health. Insanity, IQ, and criminal responsibility. Reality and delusion. Rorschach. Malingering. Rosenhan experiment. Delusional disorder. Schizophrenia. QAnon. Pizzagate. Timothy McVeigh. UNABomber. Anders Breivik. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

From The Desk of Tim Ozman 5/15/22: The MSM uses fear and shock to deter scrutiny. I overcame the shock of their agitprop after the Christchurch shooting. Here are my observations so far which constitute a preponderance of the evidence justifying my claims of hoaxery. My initial impression upon hearing of this latest shooter was how it was clearly patterned off previous fake shooters like Brenton Tarrant, Anders Breivik, Patrick Crusius, Dylan Roof, and Nick Cruz. The shooter was compared to Kyle Rittenhouse (who was trending today) because he traveled for several hours to get to the location. Like the El Paso Wal-Mart shooter Patrick Crusius, he was motivated by anti-immigrant sentiment learned on the Internet. His Manifesto is plagiarized from Anders Breivik and Brenton Tarrant. The MSM had an immediate and unified response: this was an Internet radicalized terrorist and a product of Fox News, specifically Tucker Carlson. The agenda-driven response was immediate: the Government needs to act, Minority Report-style, to stop these preventable shootings. Preventable, of course, by monitoring "free speech" on social media. The timing of this event with the election cycle is too perfect. It's especially convenient that Tucker Carlson can be effectively scapegoated here. We witnessed here an example of "Scooby-doo justice": the villain was caught, exposed, deconstructed, and in court in the span of one episode of Scooby-doo. There is no need for the presumption of innocence because the MSM is the judge and jury in the court of public opinion. Brenton Tarrant and Payton Gendron need to get refunds on their GoPro lenses. Gendron's camera pixelated and made it very easy to cover up the fakery. There is little reason to think it wasn't pre-produced and streamed as though live. The glitchiness of the video is part of the ruse to make it appear live. It was exaggeratedly and comically glitchy. The platform Twitch is obviously in the crosshairs of big censorship. One of the victims magically appears from the pixelation only to fall headfirst, only he stops moving and falling, as though frozen in time. His hat floats down but then freezes in mid-air before debris appears all around this levitating/ suspended presumably dead person, and then the pixels wash it all away. Others were already posed on the ground. There was a "squibbyness" to the bullet impacts. The bodies were left for live streaming witnesses to broadcast. None of the responders decided to roll one of them onto her back to check a pulse. The bodies weren't covered and no efforts were made to check for signs of life. (Did NASA produce this?) This shooting was in part retaliation for the Waukesha truck attack, which itself was retaliation for Kenosha. This mirrors the Boulder King Super's supermarket shooting which was retaliation for the Christchurch shooting. On October 19, 2021, the Buffalo shooter Tweeted "Q sent me" from the account @Qanon1062021. This is a reference to 1/06/2021, and the Qanon Shaman who proclaimed "Q sent me." Even more interesting: the Qanon Shaman had "buffalo" horns. Tim Ozman, IPR Host -- Watch live at https://www.twitch.tv/infiniteplane --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/infinite-plane-radio/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/infinite-plane-radio/support

There are two types of terrorists: those who die/are killed in their attacks and those who are not.  The latter usually end up in prison for long periods of time.  Then what?  Borealis talks once again with Norwegian CT analyst Atle Mesoy on the infamous Anders Breivik case from 2011.►Listen to my previous podcast with Atle Mesoy: Episode #126 - Is it time to revisit the mental illness/terrorism nexus? Atle Mesoy is the founder of U-Turn, an Oslo-based NGO working to prevent violent extremism. U-Turn is based on research and fieldwork within terrorism and political violence and consists of experts from different backgrounds providing a holistic and critical approach to CVE (Countering Violent Extremism).Phil Gurski is the President and CEO of Borealis Threat and Risk Consulting Ltd. and Programme Director for the Security, Economics and Technology (SET) hub at the University of Ottawa's Professional Development Institute (PDI). He worked as a senior strategic analyst at CSIS (Canadian Security Intelligence Service) from 2001-2015, specializing in violent Islamist-inspired homegrown terrorism and radicalisation.►Check Phil's latest book ''The Peaceable Kingdom'' - https://borealisthreatandrisk.com/the-peaceable-kingdom/►Website - https://borealisthreatandrisk.com/►Twitter - https://twitter.com/borealissaves►LinkedIn - https://www.linkedin.com/in/phil-gurski-8942468/►Email - borealisrisk@gmail.com

This episode we talk about the heinous terror act commited by Anders Breivik in Norway in 2011 where he killed 77 people and his request to be released. Twitter: https://twitter.com/at_randompod Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/at.random.podcast/ Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC0CpGU3dqJ4LLREYj-eovrg Discord Server: https://discord.gg/xwBWtkW

Journalist Andrew Gold and forensic psychiatrist Dr. Sohom Das from A Psych for Sore Minds take a look inside the minds of perpetrators in three scary and fascinating true crime cases. We start with Anders Breivik, who killed 77 people - the most ever fatalities by a single gunman.  Dr. Sohom Das links: A Psych for Sore Minds YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CU2T2mo13y0&ab_channel=APsychForSoreMinds http://www.drdas.co.uk https://twitter.com/Dr_S_Das Andrew Gold links: http://youtube.com/andrewgold1 http://instagram.com/andrewgold_ok http://twitter.com/andrewgold_ok http://andrewgoldpodcast.com Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Am 22. Juli 2011 ermordete Anders Breivik 77 Landsleute, die meisten von ihnen junge Menschen. Damals schwor sich Norwegen auf einen Weg der Liebe und des Zusammenhalts ein. Was ist davon übrig? Alexandra Rojkov und Dietmar Pieper haben mit Überlebenden des Massakers auf der Insel Utøya darüber gesprochen. Im Podcast erzählen Sie von ihren Erkenntnissen.  ANZEIGE Wer kombiniert hat alle Vorteile: vodafone.de/gigakombi oder in deinem Vodafone Shop. Finde heraus wie du profitieren kannst auf vodafone.de/gigakombi oder in deinem Vodafone Shop. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.