Podcasts about overshoot day

E Méindeg war et also nees esou wäit: Lëtzebuerg hat säin Overshoot Day – an dat dëst Joer nach dräi Deeg méi fréi wéi zejoert. De Grand-Duché ass domat nees dat zweet Land op der Welt, nom Katar, an éischt Land an Europa, dat all seng natierlech Ressourcen fir dëst Joer schonn opgebraucht huet. An der Theorie op d'mannst. Well den Overshoot Day ass virun allem ee symboleschen Datum an net wierklech gräifbar. A genee dat ass de Problem, mengt d'Marlène Clement a sengem Commentaire.

E' oggi 1 agosto la data dell'Earth Overshoot Day 2024, il giorno del sovrasfruttamento della Terra. A calcolarlo ogni anno è Global Footprint Network e questa data indica come in soli 7 mesi l'umanità abbia già utilizzato ciò che la Terra impiega 12 mesi per rigenerare.

Si halen näischt vu Rumeuren a Couloires- oder Béierdeckelsgespréicher. Si hunn hir Informatiounen aus éischter Hand oder bal. Soss gouf ëmmer gesot 'béis Zong behaapten', an elo hunn se e Numm. Beim Christiane Kremer sinn den Al Ginter, Jacques Kapp, Lucien Czuga an de Gérard Valerius.

Møde nr. 58 i salen 1) Besvarelse af oversendte spørgsmål til ministrene (spørgetid). SPØRGSMÅL: 2) 1. behandling af lovforslag nr. L 108: Forslag til lov om socialt frikort. Af social- og boligministeren (Pernille Rosenkrantz-Theil). (Fremsættelse 07.02.2024). 1) Til indenrigs- og sundhedsministeren af: Susie Jessen Hvad er ministerens holdning til den lokale V-kandidat Iben Krogs meldinger i Lolland-Falsters Folketidende den 5. februar 2024 om at sikre en bedre lægedækning i hele landet ved at give praktiserende læger et større økonomisk incitament til at praktisere uden for de store byer, og agter ministeren på den baggrund at iværksætte initiativer, der kan sikre, at flere stillinger som praktiserende læge og uddannelsesstillinger som speciallæge i almen medicin besættes i Region Sjælland, Syddanmark og Nordjylland? (Spm. nr. S 512, skr. begr.). 2) Til indenrigs- og sundhedsministeren af: Mads Olsen Vil regeringen i forlængelse af den store kritik, som Rigsrevisionen lægger op til i forhold til ventetider til udredning og behandling i børne- og ungepsykiatrien, indføre en akutpakke svarende til den, de har indført på kræftområdet, så man på sigt både kan få sikret tilstrækkelig støtte og behandling, men også hjælp til de forpinte børn og unge og deres pårørende, før de er tilstrækkeligt udredt? (Spm. nr. S 533, skr. begr.). 3) Til indenrigs- og sundhedsministeren af: Peter Kofod Hvad er ministerens holdning til at revurdere kommunalreformen fra 2007 og lade borgerne tage stilling til, om kommunegrænserne blev trukket rigtigt ved reformen? (Spm. nr. S 580 Medspørger: Morten Messerschmidt (DF)). 4) Til indenrigs- og sundhedsministeren af: Peter Kofod Er ministeren enig i, at beslutninger skal træffes så tæt på borgeren som muligt, og at kommunalreformen fra 2007 i mange tilfælde har ført til, at borgerne ikke føler sig hørt? (Spm. nr. S 582 Medspørger: Morten Messerschmidt (DF)). 5) Til indenrigs- og sundhedsministeren af: Morten Messerschmidt Hvad vil ministeren gøre for at modvirke den tendens, som kommunalreformen i 2007 har medført, nemlig at udvikling og initiativer samler sig om kommunens største by, mens de mindre byer inden for en kommune bliver ladt i stikken? (Spm. nr. S 583. Medspørger: Peter Kofod (DF)). 6) Til indenrigs- og sundhedsministeren af: Morten Messerschmidt Hvorfor mener ministeren, at der er behov for så store kommunale enheder, når udviklingen siden 2007 har vist, at der ikke er sammenhæng mellem en kommunes befolkningsmæssige størrelse og kommunens økonomiske holdbarhed? (Spm. nr. S 584. Medspørger: Peter Kofod (DF)). 7) Til justitsministeren af: Mikkel Bjørn Vil ministeren forklare, hvorfor ministeren med henvisning til Danmarks sikkerhed gennem koranloven har begrænset danskernes ytringsfrihed, mens ministeren stadig mener, at det skal være lovligt at kalde til jihad på åben gade i Danmark, og har ministeren ikke dermed stadfæstet et princip om, at ytringsfriheden for muslimske jihadister til at opfordre til massemord skal være større end for danskere, der ønsker at ytre kritik af Koranen? (Spm. nr. S 531). 8) Til miljøministeren af: Kenneth Fredslund Petersen Hvordan vil ministeren fremadrettet sikre en markant kortere samlet sagsbehandlingstid på miljøtilladelser i erhvervshavnene særligt i forhold til klapning, der er en essentiel del af den løbende havnedrift i langt de fleste erhvervshavne? (Spm. nr. S 475 (omtrykt)). 9) Til miljøministeren af: Theresa Scavenius Vil ministeren foranlediget af Nordic Waste-sagen tage initiativ til, at der igangsættes en undersøgelse af, hvorvidt tilsynet med listevirksomheder er tilstrækkeligt, heriblandt om lovgivningen og vejledningerne stemmer overens med de EU-direktiver, der er lovramme for tilsynet, og om tilsynsmyndigheden har tilstrækkelige midler til at prioritere og kvalificere tilsynet med listevirksomheder? (Spm. nr. S 574, skr. begr.). 10) Til miljøministeren af: Theresa Scavenius Vil ministeren tage initiativ til, at der udarbejdes lovforslag, der korrekt implementerer de relevante miljøretlige EU-direktiver i dansk lovgivning, så Danmark i højere grad følger de rammer, EU har sat for vores miljølovgivning, og at risikovilligheden for miljøkatastrofer for fremtiden minimeres? (Spm. nr. S 576, skr. begr.). 11) Til social- og boligministeren af: Aki-Matilda Høegh-Dam Mener ministeren, at det er rimeligt, at initiativet vedrørende en oversættelse og tilpasning af psykologiske tests til grønlandske forældre, som var fastsat i finansloven 2023, nu er blevet forsinket på ubestemt tid, og hvordan vil ministeren forhindre yderligere forsinkelser af initiativet? (Spm. nr. S 565). 12) Til beskæftigelsesministeren af: Victoria Velasquez Vil ministeren svare på det rimelige i, at mindsteudbetalingsreglen i dagpengesystemet straffer bygningsarbejderne, når de hyres og fyres så tilfældigt, som de gør? (Spm. nr. S 575, skr. begr.). 13) Til børne- og undervisningsministeren af: Karina Adsbøl Hvad er ministerens svar til de bekymrede forældre på Borup Skole, der i et brev til ministeren spørger, om det er rimeligt, at offeret skal gå på samme skole som krænkeren efter at have været udsat for slemme forbrydelser? (Spm. nr. S 585, skr. begr.). 14) Til børne- og undervisningsministeren af: Karina Adsbøl Hvad er ministerens holdning til at iværksætte initiativer, der fremover tydeliggør, hvordan kommunalbestyrelser og skoler kan skærme børn, som har udvist grænseoverskridende adfærd og begået overgreb på andre børn, fra de krænkede børn med henblik på at iværksætte de rette indsatser for børnene, der har krænket og er blevet krænket, såvel som deres forældre? (Spm. nr. S 586, skr. begr.). 15) Til udlændinge- og integrationsministeren af: Susie Jessen Hvad agter ministeren at gøre for at bekæmpe det, som Socialdemokratiets udlændinge- og integrationsordfører Frederik Vad Nielsen i et interview med Berlingske kalder for »herskerattitude« blandt ikkevestlige indvandrere? (Spm. nr. S 481, skr. begr. (omtrykt)). 16) Til udlændinge- og integrationsministeren af: Mette Thiesen Hvordan agter ministeren at komme ulovlige islamiske vielser af mindreårige til livs, når politiet, som i en sag, der er omtalt i Berlingske den 1. februar 2024, afstår fra at rejse sigtelse i et tilfælde, hvor et barn er blevet islamisk gift, og når ingen er dømt for at have overtrådt loven, siden den blev indført i 2021? (Spm. nr. S 490, skr. begr. (omtrykt) Medspørger: Mikkel Bjørn (DF)). 17) Til udlændinge- og integrationsministeren af: Mikkel Bjørn Hvad er ministerens holdning til, at Flygtningenævnet nu har vurderet, at folk fra Gaza, der kommer til Danmark, vil have ret til midlertidig beskyttelse i Danmark, og at statsløse palæstinensere vil blive anerkendt som konventionsflygtninge? (Spm. nr. S 567). 18) Til skatteministeren af: Hans Kristian Skibby Hvad er ministerens holdning til, at Skattestyrelsen, Udbetaling Danmark m.fl. sender opkrævninger til borgere på helt ned til 9 øre og tilmed truer med at sætte Gældsstyrelsen til at inddrive beløbet, hvis der ikke betales rettidigt, og vil ministeren være indstillet på at indføre en generel minimumsgrænse for opkrævninger, og i bekræftende fald, hvad ville niveauet for denne grænse, ifølge ministeren, med fordel kunne sættes til? (Spm. nr. S 526, skr. begr.). 19) Til uddannelses- og forskningsministeren af: Lotte Rod Hvad er ministerens holdning til, at en ny pædagoguddannelse skal give meget mere legemod? (Spm. nr. S 525, skr. begr.). 20) Til uddannelses- og forskningsministeren af: Lotte Rod Hvad er ministerens holdning til at give pædagogstuderende pædagogik og kreative fag på alle semestre? (Spm. nr. S 527, skr. begr.). 21) Til klima-, energi- og forsyningsministeren af: Samira Nawa Hvad er ministerens holdning til, at vi i Danmark står til at have opbrugt vores andel af jordens ressourcer den 16. marts 2024, hvilket betyder, at Danmarks såkaldte Overshoot Day, der på dansk kan forklares som dagen, hvor menneskehedens efterspørgsel efter økosystemressourcer og -tjenester i et givet år overstiger, hvad jorden kan regenerere i det år, i år indtræffer 12 dage, før den gjorde sidste år? (Spm. nr. S 573, skr. begr.).

Møde nr. 58 i salen 1) Besvarelse af oversendte spørgsmål til ministrene (spørgetid). SPØRGSMÅL: 2) 1. behandling af lovforslag nr. L 108: Forslag til lov om socialt frikort. Af social- og boligministeren (Pernille Rosenkrantz-Theil). (Fremsættelse 07.02.2024). 1) Til indenrigs- og sundhedsministeren af: Susie Jessen Hvad er ministerens holdning til den lokale V-kandidat Iben Krogs meldinger i Lolland-Falsters Folketidende den 5. februar 2024 om at sikre en bedre lægedækning i hele landet ved at give praktiserende læger et større økonomisk incitament til at praktisere uden for de store byer, og agter ministeren på den baggrund at iværksætte initiativer, der kan sikre, at flere stillinger som praktiserende læge og uddannelsesstillinger som speciallæge i almen medicin besættes i Region Sjælland, Syddanmark og Nordjylland? (Spm. nr. S 512, skr. begr.). 2) Til indenrigs- og sundhedsministeren af: Mads Olsen Vil regeringen i forlængelse af den store kritik, som Rigsrevisionen lægger op til i forhold til ventetider til udredning og behandling i børne- og ungepsykiatrien, indføre en akutpakke svarende til den, de har indført på kræftområdet, så man på sigt både kan få sikret tilstrækkelig støtte og behandling, men også hjælp til de forpinte børn og unge og deres pårørende, før de er tilstrækkeligt udredt? (Spm. nr. S 533, skr. begr.). 3) Til indenrigs- og sundhedsministeren af: Peter Kofod Hvad er ministerens holdning til at revurdere kommunalreformen fra 2007 og lade borgerne tage stilling til, om kommunegrænserne blev trukket rigtigt ved reformen? (Spm. nr. S 580 Medspørger: Morten Messerschmidt (DF)). 4) Til indenrigs- og sundhedsministeren af: Peter Kofod Er ministeren enig i, at beslutninger skal træffes så tæt på borgeren som muligt, og at kommunalreformen fra 2007 i mange tilfælde har ført til, at borgerne ikke føler sig hørt? (Spm. nr. S 582 Medspørger: Morten Messerschmidt (DF)). 5) Til indenrigs- og sundhedsministeren af: Morten Messerschmidt Hvad vil ministeren gøre for at modvirke den tendens, som kommunalreformen i 2007 har medført, nemlig at udvikling og initiativer samler sig om kommunens største by, mens de mindre byer inden for en kommune bliver ladt i stikken? (Spm. nr. S 583. Medspørger: Peter Kofod (DF)). 6) Til indenrigs- og sundhedsministeren af: Morten Messerschmidt Hvorfor mener ministeren, at der er behov for så store kommunale enheder, når udviklingen siden 2007 har vist, at der ikke er sammenhæng mellem en kommunes befolkningsmæssige størrelse og kommunens økonomiske holdbarhed? (Spm. nr. S 584. Medspørger: Peter Kofod (DF)). 7) Til justitsministeren af: Mikkel Bjørn Vil ministeren forklare, hvorfor ministeren med henvisning til Danmarks sikkerhed gennem koranloven har begrænset danskernes ytringsfrihed, mens ministeren stadig mener, at det skal være lovligt at kalde til jihad på åben gade i Danmark, og har ministeren ikke dermed stadfæstet et princip om, at ytringsfriheden for muslimske jihadister til at opfordre til massemord skal være større end for danskere, der ønsker at ytre kritik af Koranen? (Spm. nr. S 531). 8) Til miljøministeren af: Kenneth Fredslund Petersen Hvordan vil ministeren fremadrettet sikre en markant kortere samlet sagsbehandlingstid på miljøtilladelser i erhvervshavnene særligt i forhold til klapning, der er en essentiel del af den løbende havnedrift i langt de fleste erhvervshavne? (Spm. nr. S 475 (omtrykt)). 9) Til miljøministeren af: Theresa Scavenius Vil ministeren foranlediget af Nordic Waste-sagen tage initiativ til, at der igangsættes en undersøgelse af, hvorvidt tilsynet med listevirksomheder er tilstrækkeligt, heriblandt om lovgivningen og vejledningerne stemmer overens med de EU-direktiver, der er lovramme for tilsynet, og om tilsynsmyndigheden har tilstrækkelige midler til at prioritere og kvalificere tilsynet med listevirksomheder? (Spm. nr. S 574, skr. begr.). 10) Til miljøministeren af: Theresa Scavenius Vil ministeren tage initiativ til, at der udarbejdes lovforslag, der korrekt implementerer de relevante miljøretlige EU-direktiver i dansk lovgivning, så Danmark i højere grad følger de rammer, EU har sat for vores miljølovgivning, og at risikovilligheden for miljøkatastrofer for fremtiden minimeres? (Spm. nr. S 576, skr. begr.). 11) Til social- og boligministeren af: Aki-Matilda Høegh-Dam Mener ministeren, at det er rimeligt, at initiativet vedrørende en oversættelse og tilpasning af psykologiske tests til grønlandske forældre, som var fastsat i finansloven 2023, nu er blevet forsinket på ubestemt tid, og hvordan vil ministeren forhindre yderligere forsinkelser af initiativet? (Spm. nr. S 565). 12) Til beskæftigelsesministeren af: Victoria Velasquez Vil ministeren svare på det rimelige i, at mindsteudbetalingsreglen i dagpengesystemet straffer bygningsarbejderne, når de hyres og fyres så tilfældigt, som de gør? (Spm. nr. S 575, skr. begr.). 13) Til børne- og undervisningsministeren af: Karina Adsbøl Hvad er ministerens svar til de bekymrede forældre på Borup Skole, der i et brev til ministeren spørger, om det er rimeligt, at offeret skal gå på samme skole som krænkeren efter at have været udsat for slemme forbrydelser? (Spm. nr. S 585, skr. begr.). 14) Til børne- og undervisningsministeren af: Karina Adsbøl Hvad er ministerens holdning til at iværksætte initiativer, der fremover tydeliggør, hvordan kommunalbestyrelser og skoler kan skærme børn, som har udvist grænseoverskridende adfærd og begået overgreb på andre børn, fra de krænkede børn med henblik på at iværksætte de rette indsatser for børnene, der har krænket og er blevet krænket, såvel som deres forældre? (Spm. nr. S 586, skr. begr.). 15) Til udlændinge- og integrationsministeren af: Susie Jessen Hvad agter ministeren at gøre for at bekæmpe det, som Socialdemokratiets udlændinge- og integrationsordfører Frederik Vad Nielsen i et interview med Berlingske kalder for »herskerattitude« blandt ikkevestlige indvandrere? (Spm. nr. S 481, skr. begr. (omtrykt)). 16) Til udlændinge- og integrationsministeren af: Mette Thiesen Hvordan agter ministeren at komme ulovlige islamiske vielser af mindreårige til livs, når politiet, som i en sag, der er omtalt i Berlingske den 1. februar 2024, afstår fra at rejse sigtelse i et tilfælde, hvor et barn er blevet islamisk gift, og når ingen er dømt for at have overtrådt loven, siden den blev indført i 2021? (Spm. nr. S 490, skr. begr. (omtrykt) Medspørger: Mikkel Bjørn (DF)). 17) Til udlændinge- og integrationsministeren af: Mikkel Bjørn Hvad er ministerens holdning til, at Flygtningenævnet nu har vurderet, at folk fra Gaza, der kommer til Danmark, vil have ret til midlertidig beskyttelse i Danmark, og at statsløse palæstinensere vil blive anerkendt som konventionsflygtninge? (Spm. nr. S 567). 18) Til skatteministeren af: Hans Kristian Skibby Hvad er ministerens holdning til, at Skattestyrelsen, Udbetaling Danmark m.fl. sender opkrævninger til borgere på helt ned til 9 øre og tilmed truer med at sætte Gældsstyrelsen til at inddrive beløbet, hvis der ikke betales rettidigt, og vil ministeren være indstillet på at indføre en generel minimumsgrænse for opkrævninger, og i bekræftende fald, hvad ville niveauet for denne grænse, ifølge ministeren, med fordel kunne sættes til? (Spm. nr. S 526, skr. begr.). 19) Til uddannelses- og forskningsministeren af: Lotte Rod Hvad er ministerens holdning til, at en ny pædagoguddannelse skal give meget mere legemod? (Spm. nr. S 525, skr. begr.). 20) Til uddannelses- og forskningsministeren af: Lotte Rod Hvad er ministerens holdning til at give pædagogstuderende pædagogik og kreative fag på alle semestre? (Spm. nr. S 527, skr. begr.). 21) Til klima-, energi- og forsyningsministeren af: Samira Nawa Hvad er ministerens holdning til, at vi i Danmark står til at have opbrugt vores andel af jordens ressourcer den 16. marts 2024, hvilket betyder, at Danmarks såkaldte Overshoot Day, der på dansk kan forklares som dagen, hvor menneskehedens efterspørgsel efter økosystemressourcer og -tjenester i et givet år overstiger, hvad jorden kan regenerere i det år, i år indtræffer 12 dage, før den gjorde sidste år? (Spm. nr. S 573, skr. begr.).

Themen: Gaza-Maniff, Feier um Belval, Propositioune vun der Caritas, Wollef zu Jonglënster, Overshoot Day, Café-Restaurant Waldhaff, Nawalny-Protester a Sport.

Themen: Gaza-Maniff, Feier um Belval, Propositioune vun der Caritas, Wollef zu Jonglënster, Overshoot Day, Café-Restaurant Waldhaff, Nawalny-Protester a Sport.

Claudius Schulze spricht mit Christoph Wellner unter anderem über seine Funktion als künstlerischer Leiter der ersten Klimabiennale Wiens. Eröffnet wird die Biennale am Overshoot Day Österreichs. Dem Tag, an dem Österreich alle natürlich zur Verfügung stehenden Ressourcen verbraucht hat.  So viel vorab: im Fokus der Biennale stehen folgende Fragen: Was kann Kunst für unsere Zukunft tun? Was kann Kunst im Zusammenhang mit der Klimakrise tun? Wie können wir uns mit Kunst mit dem Leben in der Zukunft auseinandersetzen?

Mercoledì 2 agosto è stato l'Earth Overshoot Day per il 2023, cioè il giorno nel quale l'umanità ha consumato interamente le risorse prodotte dal pianeta nell'intero anno e ha cominciato a intaccare le riserve future. Una data che ogni anno cade un po' prima. In questa puntata si parla di economia lineare e circolare, di sviluppo sostenibile e di altra roba forte come l'impronta ecologica e un piccolo incidente capitato all'equipaggio dell'Apollo 10 mentre girava attorno alla luna nel 1969. Con le voci di Gianpiero Kesten e Davide Gorla. Il libro "Energia per l'astronave Terra" di Vincenzo Balzani e Nicola Armaroli, Zanichelli 2017. Altre fonti. Il bagno della Stazione Spaziale Internazionale. L'incidente dell'Apollo 10. Overshoot Day. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Who is responsible for the climate crisis? And how safe is it actually for everyone when we keep within established planetary boundaries? Wouter Mulders and Neha Mungekar are very honoured to get to wrap up this season by discussing such questions with Joyeeta Gupta. She is a professor of Environment and Development in the Global South at the University of Amsterdam and a 2023 winner of the Spinoza Prize, which is like the Dutch Nobel Prize for science.We talk about the novels of Perry Mason being an early inspiration, about how she managed to make climate law interesting for a diverse group of students and about the relation between gender, wealth distribution and climate action.And Joyeeta wonders: how do we get to a storyline of more global equality? And why is it normal for engineers and pharmaceutical scientists to set standards and make recommendations, but not for climate scholars?Handy links: ‘Prestigious Spinoza Prize for UvA professor Joyeeta Gupta': https://www.uva.nl/en/content/news/news/2023/06/prestigious-spinoza-prize-for-uva-professor-joyeeta-gupta.html‘Earth System Boundaries must include justice': https://www.uva.nl/en/shared-content/faculteiten/en/faculteit-der-maatschappij-en-gedragswetenschappen/news/2023/03/how-to-include-earth-system-justice-within-earth-system-boundaries.htmlThe nine planetary boundaries: https://www.stockholmresilience.org/research/planetary-boundaries/the-nine-planetary-boundaries.htmlFor more transition know-how and how-to, please go to https://drift.eur.nl/    Thanks to: Audrey Wientjes for voice-over, Marius Kooij for editing, Igno Notermans for producing, Walvisnest for music, Lieven Heeremans for all sorts of advice and all our DRIFT colleagues for support and inspiration.

Elezioni in Turchia: si andrà al ballottaggio tra due settimane. Sentiamo Eleonora Tafuro, analista ISPI per l'area Russia e Caucaso. Oggi per l'Italia è il cosiddetto Overshoot Day, cioè il giorno in cui il nostro paese finisce le risorse per il 2023 e inizia a utilizzate quelle che dovrebbero essere capitale naturale per il futuro. Con noi Stefano Caserini, docente di mitigazione dei cambiamenti climatici al Politecnico di Milano.

Oggi, 15 maggio 2023, è l'Overshoot day per l'Italia, ossia il giorno in cui abbiamo consumato le risorse che siamo in grado di rigenerare entro l'anno: più di un terzo di questa impronta deriva dalle abitudini alimentari.Leila Belhadj Mohamed, esperta di geopolitica, ci racconta dello sciopero della fame di 400 donne condannate a Baghdad per l'appartenenza allo Stato islamico.Gli articoli citati oggi:Il 15 maggio l'Italia finisce tutte le risorse che la Terra ha da offrirle per il 2023: è l'Overshoot day, Valentina Neri È scaduto il Titolo 42, migliaia di migranti al confine tra Messico e Stati Uniti, Simone Santi

Wir Deutschen und Schweizer bräuchten für unseren Lebensstil eigentlich fast drei Planeten. Das zeigt uns der Overshoot Day. Warum der Overshoot Day uns aber nicht bedrücken soll, sondern uns hilft, bessere Entscheidungen zu treffen, erklären in diesem Podcast der Erfinder des ökologischen Fussabdrucks, Mathis Wackernagel und FiBL Forscherin Anita Frehner.Der Overshoot Day fällt dieses Jahr für die Schweiz auf den 13. Mai und für Deutschland auf den 4. Mai. Das heisst, zwischen dem 1. Januar und diesem Datum hätte die Menschheit schon mehr verbraucht, als die Erde im ganzen Jahr erneuern kann – wenn alle so leben würden, wie wir in der Schweiz oder in Deutschland. Alles zusammengerechnet ist also ab Mitte Mai bis zum Ende des Jahres unser Verbrauch pro Kopf mehr, als was sich in einem Jahr regeneriert, also zum Beispiel Holz, Meeresfische, Fleisch, Weizen, CO2-Emissionen, Kleidungsfasern, und so weiter. Was dies auf wirtschaftlicher, landwirtschaftlicher und persönlicher Ebene bedeutet, erläutern Mathis Wackernagel und Anita Frehner im Gespräch mit der FiBL Focus Redaktorin Franziska Hämmerli. Anita forscht am FiBL zu nachhaltiger und gesunder Ernährung. Mathis ist der Gründer und Präsident des Global Footprint Networks. Das ist eine Non-Profit-Organisation die mit dem ökologischen Fussabdruck arbeitet, einem Buchhaltungssystem für natürliche Ressourcen. Bei Anregungen, Fragen oder Kritik meldet euch auf podcast@fibl.org. Bis zum nächsten Mal, wir freuen uns auf euch, euer FiBL-Focus-Team.Folge 42/Hochdeutsch /23 Min 47 Sec LinksOvershoot Day Website: www.overshootday.orgOvershoot Day Schweiz: www.overshootday.org/schweizOvershoot Day Deutschland: www.overshootday.org/deutschlandDen eigenen Fussabdruck berechnen: www.footprintcalculator.org GästeMathis Wackernagel, Global Footprint Network  Anita Frehner, FiBLModeration und RedaktionFranziska Hämmerli, FiBLAn- und AbmoderationAnke Beermann, FiBLE-Mailpodcast@fibl.orgInstagram@fibl_focusWebsitewww.fibl.orgFiBL Focus ist der Podcastkanal des FiBL Schweiz, einem der weltweit grössten Forschungsinstitute für biologischen Landbau.

Die Väter Lars, ehemals angehender Gymnasiallehrer für Mathematik und Informatik und Andi aka Crocodileandy, gelernter Architekt, sind auf Umwegen zu Social Media Stars geworden. Mit Kreativität und dem Willen anderen etwas beizubringen haben sie mit Hilfe von Minecraft ihre Reichweite gewonnen. In dem Podcast "Besser als Nackt" dreht sich alles um die unverblümte Wahrheit des Lebens. Viel Spaß beim Anhören!

Een item in het NOS-Journaal waarin sociaal wetenschapper Laurens Buijs duiding gaf over het toenemende homofobe geweld, liet afgelopen week een storm aan kritiek losbarsten. Zijn optreden leidde tot veel onbegrip op sociale media. Cocky begrijpt deze ophef, waar Talitha dit onbegrijpelijk vindt en het ‘extreem sensitief' noemt.  In hoeverre moeten wij en media op een heuvel van de geaccepteerde mening blijven of de randen van de discussie opzoeken? En wie bepaalt welke mening wel of niet mag? Ook de taalgids van het Landelijk Aktie Komitee Scholieren (LAKS) deed online de rondte. Het gaat om een opsomming van tips om genderverschillen binnen het onderwijs weg te werken en meer inclusief taalgebruik te stimuleren.   Gaat deze ontwikkeling voorbij aan emancipatie en schemert er een ideologie doorheen? En wat ligt ten grondslag aan de kritische geluiden over de taalgids? Afgelopen woensdag Dutch Overshoot Day: de dag waarop Nederlanders de biocapaciteit hebben verbruikt die de aarde in één jaar tijd kan produceren en aan afvalstoffen kan verwerken.   Hoe bewust zijn we ons van deze Overshoot Day? En hoe kunnen we nog bijdragen aan de oplossing van dit probleem?

Påsklov och dags för ett bonusavsnitt om ungefär vad som helst. Högt och lågt, fotbollsbråk och IPCC, media, aprilskämt och Sustainable Brand Index.I bonusavsnittet "Äggstra allt" tar vi ett grepp om nuläget i april 2023 – där allt från greenwashing och Overshoot Day till regeringssågningar av Klimatpolitiska rådet får plats. Emma berättar varför hon helst tar ut lönen i jämna tusenlappar och bara kollar på termometern när det är jämna gradantal, och Maria lyckas med ett extrainsatt aprilskämt som fastnar på band. Glad påsk! I Plan B-podden vill vi utforska hur livet 2.0 kan bli. Det göttiga livet efter omställningen, som håller sig inom planetens gränser och där normer och status bygger på helt andra värden än pengar, flashiga prylar och flotta yrkestitlar. Om vi fabriksåterställer världen och börjar om, vad ska vi då satsa på för att plan B-livet inte bara ska bli hållbart utan till och med bättre än det fossilstinkande plan A-livet?PODDARE Emma Sundh & Maria SoxboKONTAKT Mail, Facebook & Instagram. Get bonus content on Patreon Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Hvad har reaktionerne været på Netanyahus beslutning om sætte regeringens omstridte retsreform på pause? Hvad betyder "Overshoot Day" i praksis for klimakrisen? Hvilke konsekvenser vil regeringen tage af Amnestys kritik om, at Danmark ikke overholder menneskerettighederne? Dagens værter: Jan Falkentoft & Maria Dohn.

Demokratie oder wat eigentlech? D'Schrëftstellerin Elise Schmit mécht sech Gedanken iwwert d'Konsequenze vum demografesche Wandel.

Earth's history has known five great mass extinctions. The sixth is in progress and this time, it is the man who is the cause. What is the impact of our way of life and consumption on the environment? What are the avenues for a more sustainable use of natural resources? How to protect biodiversity in order to regain an ecological balance? This week, Luxembourg arrived at Overshoot Day - the day of the year when a country depletes the last of its unreplenishable resources for the year - faster than any country in the world (apart from Quatar). A new exhibition at the Natural History Museum of Luxembourg explores the avenues that Luxembourg can take to achieve a more sustainable and greener future. For Culture Matters, Ben George Coles interviews curator of the exhibition Monique Kirsch.

On EP01 - So You Want to be an Environmentalist? the girls mentioned Overshoot Day but in this episode, they are giving you all the nuts & potatoes… in detail. Not only do the girls define overshoot, but they also explain how it is calculated, dive into how overshoot varies by country, and they put themselves in the hot seat by revealing their own Overshoot date. Find out yours at: https://www.footprintcalculator.org/home/en https://www.overshootday.org http://www.footprintnetwork.org https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/ab5f96/pdf https://www.footprintcalculator.org/home/en

➡ Reminder: I will be writing much less frequently and much shorter in November — and November only. So for this month, I have paused payment from paid subscribers.Also, I'm making all new content free without a paywall. In December, however, everything will be back to normal: typically three meaty essays and two enlightening Q&As a week, along with a pro-progress podcast like this one several times a month (including transcript). And, of course, a weekly recap over the weekends.Melior Mundus“Generations of people throughout the world have been taught to believe that there is an inverse relationship between population growth and the availability of resources, which is to say that as the population grows, resources become more scarce.” That's how Marian Tupy and Gale Pooley open their new book, Superabundance: The Story of Population Growth, Innovation, and Human Flourishing on an Infinitely Bountiful Planet. It's also the central premise of much of today's Down Wing, zero-sum thinking. And it happens to be wrong. Tupy and Pooley:It is free people, not machines or deities, who generate new ideas, and it is free people who test those new ideas against other people's ideas in the marketplace. The process of knowledge and value creation is at the heart of humanity's moral and material progress. It is what enables our civilization to bend towards goodness and superabundance.What is superabundance? The authors again: “[A]bundance occurs when the nominal hourly income increases faster than the nominal price of a resource,” meaning resources become cheaper (more abundant!) in real terms. Superabundance occurs “when the abundance of resources grows at a faster rate than population increases.” And that's exactly what we see in the world today.Cato Institute senior fellow and HumanProgress.org editor Marian Tupy joins me in this episode of Faster, Please! — The Podcast to discuss superabundance, Hollywood's Malthusianism, and more.In This Episode* Will we ever run out of Earth? (1:33)* Can our planet sustain billions of people living like Americans? (5:13)* The burden of proof is on the doomsayers (12:12)* The more people, the better (18:04)Below is an edited transcript of our conversation.Will we ever run out of Earth?James Pethokoukis: There's only so much Earth, so eventually, aren't we going to run out of Earth and its bounty?Marian Tupy: It's certainly true that the Earth has a finite number of atoms, but the amount of value that we can get from those atoms is basically infinite. Look at something as simple as sand that has been on Earth for billions of years. At some point thousands of years ago, people realize that they could turn sand into glass jars and later into windows. And now we are using sand in order to create fiber optic cables, which are carrying information around the world at very high speeds and a lot of volume in order to power our civilization's communication networks. So from something as simple as a grain of sand, you can get ever more value.If you are somebody who thinks economic growth is a good thing, who wants the global economy to keep growing—and, gee, it'd be great if it grew even faster—at some point it's going to hit a limit. Aren't we already seeing that with lithium shortages? I hear that lithium shortages are going to slow the green transition. So aren't people who are pro-growth, pro-progress, or pro-abundance—even pro-superabundance—isn't that just kind of a temporary state and eventually, I don't know, 50 years, 100, that's not a tenable position over the really long, long run?No, because knowledge continues to expand. As long as we have more people on Earth, and hopefully one day in cooperation with AI or advanced computing, we'll be able to create evermore knowledge. And it is that knowledge which allows us to get around problems of scarcity. Lithium is a perfect example. Lithium-ion batteries are a massive advance in terms of storage of electricity. But who is to say whether batteries in the future will be powered by lithium? Maybe we'll come up with a different compound, which will allow us to store energy at a much cheaper price. In fact, people are already working on basically creating batteries out of, not lithium-ion, but sodium-ion, which apparently is going to last even longer and will be massively cheaper. So it's not only a question of efficiency gains—instead of using three ounces of tin or aluminum for a can of Coke, you are now using only half an ounce—and it's not just about technological breakthroughs like, for example, GMO foods so that you can increase the yield of plants for an acre of land; it's also about substitution. This is very important. It's about substitution. You are using something in order to get to a certain goal, but you may realize 10 years, 100 years from now that you don't actually need it, that you need something completely different. And humanity has been through this very often. Two-hundred years ago, the great discovery was of course coal and steam. And people immediately started wondering, what is going to happen by the year 1900 or 1950 when we are all going to run out of coal? And then oil and gas came on board and displaced coal to a great extent. So substitution will play its role, and lithium is not going to be a problem.Can our planet sustain billions of people living like Americans?There was certainly a time where people were—and some people still are—worried very much about overpopulation. This really became a thing in the early 1970s, where we worried that we had too many people. We were worried about natural resource constraints. We were going to be running out of oil and just about everything else. How much is your thesis is based on the idea that global population will continue to grow to maybe 10 or 11 billion and then it stops? Would you still have this thesis if we were going to have a population of 30 billion people, all of whom would like to live like Americans do today, if not better? Is the idea of a constrained population key to this forecast?You started by pointing to the 1970s, and whilst it is true that many academics have departed from the basic Malthusian premise that more people will lead to an exhaustion of resources, what we found writing this book was very disturbing, which is that Malthusian ideas are much more widespread than we originally thought amongst the common public, amongst the ordinary people. In fact, as far as we can tell, a disproportionate number of mass shooters in America and also around the world, especially in developed countries, have been people driven by Malthusian ideas. This goes back to Anders Breivik in Norway, then the guy called Tarrant in New Zealand, all the way to the mass shooters in the United States, the guy who killed 22 people in El Paso in Walmart a couple of years ago—all of these people have been driven by the notion that there are far too many people in the world using far too many resources. The Malthusian notions are still very much present. You can also get them from multi-national organizations like the United Nations. You have these websites like the Overshoot Day and things like that still. So people still buy into it, and that's deeply worrying because obviously we think that population growth is…Overshoot, meaning that we're overshooting the capacity of our resources and that for everyone to live like Americans, we would need 10 Earths—and obviously we don't have 10 Earths.The current calculations say that we are already using 1.7 planets in order to maintain our standards of living, which is ridiculous because we still only have one planet. How can we already be using 1.7 planets? It doesn't make any sense.Wouldn't they say this isn't sustainable? People who are very worried about running out of everything, when they talk about growth, it's never just growth, it's “sustainable growth.” What they mean is sustainable environmentally.And when it comes to that, then of course we have to ask, how would this unsustainability present itself in the real world? People are living longer. People are living richer lives. The very fact that longevity had been expanding until COVID suggests that we are also living healthier lives. We are better fed. And not just that: As countries become richer, they have much more money to spend on environmental protection. The extraordinary lengths that Western societies go through in order to protect their oceans and their land and their biomass and biodiversity—nothing like this has been done by humans before. Where is this apocalypse going to come from? Another way of looking at it is the question of existential threat. Well, existential threat to whom? Existential threat to humanity? But how are we going to measure it? The only way we can measure it is by looking at how many people a year are dying due to extreme weather. And that particular statistic has been reduced by 99.8 percent over the last 100 years. So even though the language of the extreme environmentalist movement is getting more and more apocalyptic, the number of people who are dying due to extreme weather is continuing to collapse.Let me ask that question in a simpler way: Do we have the ability, do we have the resources, for everyone on this planet to have at least the standard of living as Americans and Western Europeans do today? Can we do that? That's the response I often get on social media: They'll say that we cannot afford to have eight billion people living the way 300 million Americans do. Is that possible?If the basic premise of the book is correct, then yes, not just for eight billion, but potentially substantially more for the following reason: Ideas are not constrained by the laws of physics. Yes, the planets, atoms are constrained by the laws of physics, but not the ideas produced by the human brain. So long as you have more people living in freedom, communicating together, exchanging ideas—in the words of Matt Ridley, “ideas having sex”—then you can always come up with a solution to shortages, which would be, in that case, temporary, driving up prices, therefore incentivizing people to look for solutions. The essence of the book is, there are no physical limits to abundance; and therefore, it should be possible for the world to have the living standards of Americans.Is this a faith-based premise, based on a fairly short period in human existence? That you're assuming that we can still do it, that humanity is ingenious enough that we can continue to be more efficient and come up with new ways of doing things infinitely?Is it faith-based? Thomas Sowell has that great quote that the caveman had exactly the same amount of resources that we have in the world today. And the difference between their standard of living and our standard of living is the knowledge that we bring to bear onto the resources that we have. In fact, you might argue that the only reason why any resources are valuable is because of the ability of human beings to interact with them and produce value out of them. If you think about the immense difference between our standards of living and those of people in the Stone Age—again, the resources haven't gone anywhere, they're still with us; except for a few tons of metal that we have shot into space, everything else is still here: the same amount of copper, the same amount of iron—there is no reason to think that people 200 years from now who are much richer than us couldn't utilize those resources in a similarly beneficial fashion.The burden of proof is on the doomsayersLet me ask you this: Who should the burden of proof be on? People who are worried about the sustainability of growth, who think there's no way this Earth can tolerate eight or 10 billion people living like Western Europeans: Should the burden of proof be on them, or should the burden of proof be on you to say that, yes, we've done it in the past and we can continue to do it in the future?I think the burden should be on them in the following sense: This is not the first time that this particular concept has been proposed. The famous wager between Simon and Ehrlich was essentially…Explain that wager just very briefly for people. What is that wager?Paul Ehrlich is the famous biologist from Stanford University. He wrote the 1968 Population Bomb book, which became an international bestseller. He was on Johnny Carson's show like 20 times, scared and scarred generations of Americans into believing that the world was going to end because of lack of natural resources. In fact, it was based on his work that you've got Soylent Green, the famous 1973 movie with Charlton Heston. And that movie basically culminates in 2022—it's this year that the movie is supposed to happen. And of course, we never got anything like that. On the East Coast, Julian Simon at the University of Maryland basically challenged him to a bet. He said, “Look, Ehrlich, you pick any commodities you want and a time period of more than a year. We are going to put $1000 on it, and if the prices go up whilst the population expands, I'm going to pay you. If the prices go down, then you pay me.” And in fact, Ehrlich lost that bet and had to write Simon a check for $576. These believers in the apocalypse have been at this for so long that I feel that it's time for them to start convincing us that the apocalypse is coming, rather than us trying to remind them of all the previous predictions of apocalypse which didn't come true. I'm willing to go and do a bet like that.The other thing that you ask is, is this possible? Is it feasible for us to continue like that? I believe that it is feasible so long as we have at least part of the world that is still free economically and politically. I don't think that we can expect cutting-edge research from China, which is increasingly restrained politically and economically where people are not free to speak, interact with ideas. But so long as we are free in Western countries, be it the United States or some other country if freedom of speech comes to an end here, then we can still produce research, we can still produce progress. But of course, my belief, part of the book, is that the more people who are free, the better. It's not just about population, it's population times freedom. Freedom is incredibly important. China has been the most populous country for a very long time, but they were dirt poor until they started liberalizing. So the freedom component is very important.Why is this belief so persistent? I still hear people who still think that we are headed toward a population of 30 billion, who think that's a big issue, who are very surprised to learn that there are countries where if the population isn't already shrinking, it's very close. Do we naturally want to believe these kinds of stories? Was Julian Simon ever on the Tonight Show with Johnny Carson?No, of course not. He never got any professional award in his entire life. And you are right to say that there was always an opposition to these Malthusian thoughts. Shortly after Malthus died, there was a big debate in Britain over who was right. Then they revisited the whole concept of shortage of natural resources in the late 19th century. So it goes through ups and downs.But there's something in that story. Have we identified what that is?There's something in that story, and the big question is what it is. I think that this particular problem could have many fathers, so to speak. One of them is that people have been traditionally not numerate. And we have a problem with the notion of exponential growth and compounding. Paul Romer put his finger on it, and that is that ideas do not add up; they multiply. And so he's got that famous example of the periodic table. Once you start interacting with compounds consisting of 10 elements on the periodic table, which has 100 elements in it, you're talking about more possible combinations, more possible calculations, more possible recipes for future progress, than there are number of seconds since the beginning of the Big Bang, 14.5 billion years ago. There's just so much knowledge which can still be discovered. We have only scratched the surface of knowledge. I think that's part of the reason why people are so pessimistic: They do not understand the potential for creation of new knowledge. The other reason, probably, is that the world really is finite. That is absolutely true. It's also irrelevant, because it's what you do with those resources that matters. As I've mentioned with the example of sand and fibers, you can use resources in evermore valuable ways.The more people, the betterI know this isn't key to your thesis, but we do live in a universe. So if you say, “Maybe you're right today, but in 1000 years you'll be wrong.” Well, a lot can happen in 1000 years. If I'm betting on 1000 years, I would also guess that if we somehow hit some constraint here on Earth, we have a whole universe of stuff that we could draw upon.Well, absolutely. Can you imagine, if wealth continues to expand at the current rate, what sort of species we would encounter in 1000 years and their technological abilities?A lot of asteroids out there!What worries me is actually that there won't be enough people to explore all those possible avenues for creation of new knowledge. You mentioned population growth: Population is below replacement level in 170 countries out of 190. We are going to peak in 2060 and then start declining. Instead of worrying about 30 billion people, we are going to have to worry about a population that is going to be basically as big in 2100 as it is today. And that really constrains the knowledge horizon and how fast we get there. And that brings with it all sorts of other problems. When people say—and I was actually speaking to somebody yesterday about this—that perhaps we have enough wealth, I cannot help but think, imagine all the possible problems that we could encounter in the future, all the other existential threats: be it asteroids, or a new pathogen, or something like that. I want our society to be super rich so that if we need to shut down the economy for another year, we can afford to do so rather than do it with that. Or if we do encounter an asteroid that's hurling towards Earth, we have a super powerful laser powered by mega fusion power stations that can blast it out of the sky. We never know what the future is going to hold, but I would much rather have a wealthier society deal with it than a poorer and more technologically primitive society dealing with it.Despite the fact that these predictions that were made a half century ago have not panned out, that these bets have been lost, if there's any example of the continued power of this idea, it's really the movie Avengers and the Infinity War series. The key villain, Thanos—and this is a multi-billion-dollar franchise—and his entire plot is to kill half of all life everywhere in the universe because we're running out of space. Apparently plenty of people signed off on the idea and said, “Yes, the audience will accept that.” And the audience did accept that.In the book we talk about that movie, and I think that one in five Americans saw it. But it was just one of the movies made based on Malthusian principles. There was Kingsman and there was also Inferno, and they were all based on Malthusian ideas.I believe that one of the James Bond films was based on the peak oil theory, too. I would doubt that there was anyone at a Hollywood studio who said “This is an absurd idea.”I don't know whether you would call it genetic or cultural, but this notion of limits must be deeply embedded in our psyche. And the key to breaking with that thinking has to be the embrace of knowledge, understanding that knowledge can solve all of our problems. Just about everything that you see around you in the world today that you bemoan is due to lack of knowledge. People are dying of cancer because of lack of knowledge. Babies are dying in Africa from malaria because of lack of knowledge, although that's being fixed already by vaccines. The more knowledge, the better. Currently it's only the human mind that is capable of producing new knowledge, so we still need people. Maybe at some point in the future we are going to have a super smart AI that is going to produce its own new knowledge. But right now that's not a realistic option. I think that there is something to be said for population growth. Now, what we are certainly not suggesting is that people should be forced to have more babies. The book's goal…Are there people who suggested that's what you're saying?I hope not. That's certainly not something. The goal of the book is much less ambitious. The goal of the book is to say to all those parents around the world who are worried about bringing a new child into the world because it'll be a drag on resources, because it'll be a cancer on the planet: You don't have to worry about that. Your child has the potential of contributing to the scope and stock of human knowledge. We are basically just tackling one aspect of this anti-nativist, anti-natalist, and anti-humanist worldview, which is the issue with resources. If we can convince people that it's still okay to have children, the question famously posed by Alexandria Ocasio Cortez, then we will have done something good. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit fasterplease.substack.com/subscribe

Raising Kids, Naturally is a part of the EcoParent Podcast Network: https://www.ecoparent.ca/podcastsThis episode was generously sponsored by Orange Naturals. www.orangenaturals.comAbout the EpisodeThe standard of living currently enjoyed in the Global North is simply not sustainable. In order for our children (and all children) to have a healthy future, it is critical that we raise them to consume less. In this inspiring conversation, Leslie and Jennifer Hetzel, host of the podcast “Sustainably Geeky” explore the reasons for and the joy of making more sustainable choices in our families.Guest Bio & LinksJennifer is an activist and lifelong learner with a passion for social justice and the environment. She is currently a grad student at the National University of Ireland-Galway (NUIG), with the goal to work in sustainability full time after graduating. You can hear her on the podcast Sustainably Geeky or the Centex Planeteers show on KNCT 91.3 FM. She enjoys hiking, reading, and is mom to many plants and always taking in strays.https://www.epicallygeeky.com/sustainably-geeky Host Bio & LinksLeslie is a mother, doctor, and human who seeks to help individuals and communities reach their fullest potential. As a naturopathic doctor, Leslie will help you explore how your kids' health and wellbeing reciprocally intersect with the health of their communities and the planet, and offer practical strategies to optimize both.http://lesliesolomonian.weebly.com/about-me.htmlWorks in Progress Collective https://works-in-progress-collective.weebly.com/ Works-in-Progress is an artist collective based in Toronto and Hamilton.We make art out of garbage, co-host swaps and do workshops. We use recycled materials in art-making because up-cycling inspires creativity.Overshoot Day information: https://www.overshootday.org/ Earth Overshoot Day is hosted and calculated by Global Footprint Network, an international research organization that provides decision-makers with a menu of tools to help the human economy operate within Earth's ecological limits.About the EcoParent Podcast NetworkThe EcoParent Podcast Network helps busy families live a healthier, greener lifestyle. Our host experts are imperfect, real, busy parents just like you who share ways to lower our collective carbon footprint and practical strategies that make a difference to your family's health, the planet and to our children's future. We offer raw, honest conversations and actionable advice across our six podcasts: pregnancy & birth, pediatric wellness, kids' nutrition, green beauty, healthy home, and raising greener teens. Join us and get inspired to live a more sustainable, healthy life! www.ecoparent.ca/podcastsFeedback?What questions do you have for Leslie or her guests? What would you like to hear about?This program discusses ideas that sometimes run counter to what is considered typical, or perhaps even acceptable. We invite you to reflect on that before listening with impressionable people - interpret that as you will.PartnershipsAny advertising within this podcast does not imply endorsement of the product or company by the podcast host. Listeners are encouraged to talk to their healthcare provider about if and which natural healthcare products are appropriate for them and their families.Audio magic on this episode was performed by Carlay Ream-Neal. This episode was edited by Emily Groleau.

Freakin' weekend! Jet Blue x Spirit merger, Overshoot Day was yesterday, and and update on the PACT Act. Head to TheMorningShowPodcast.com for EVERYTHING we talk about.Sign up to play Two-Second Tunes or Cover Lovers https://forms.gle/Bf6aPVTbEqmo4QoS6WHAT'S TRENDING: https://amzn.to/3OIGHYgJOIN OUR FREE DISCORD: https://discord.gg/A2gSbFWQjTSEATTLE GUMMY COMPANY CODE CMA: https://bit.ly/2ZicpEOCARLA MARIE AND ANTHONY SHOW ⬇️Newsletter Signup: https://view.flodesk.com/pages/5f516ae62c60490027b9ec20Watch Live on Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/CarlaMarieandAnthonyCatch up on our show on YouTube: http://youtube.com/carlamarieanthonyshowFollow us on Instagram: http://instagram.com/carlamarieandanthonyFollow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/CMandAnthonyFollow us on Facebook: https://facebook.com/CarlaMarieandAnthony/Follow Carla Marie on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/thecarlamarie/Follow Anthony on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/worstanthony/ See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

1971 was the first time Earth Overshoot Day was calculated. It signified the day on which human consumption of raw materials can no longer be covered by the formation of new resources. In other words: every day after it, we incur ecological debt. When calculated in 1971 this date fell on 25 December – i.e. humanity consumed more resources than were available for only six calendar days – in just over 50 years, this date now falls on 28 July; 150 days earlier. In 2006, the first global Earth Overshoot Day campaign was launched together with the Global Footprint Network, and since 2007 the WWF, the world's largest nature conservation organisation, has been involved. “This year, from the 29th of July onwards, we will already be ecologically in debt to our children and grandchildren,” says Peter Windischhofer, CEO and Co-Founder of refurbed. “For 156 days this year, we will consume resources that do not belong to us. This is like my salary being used up on the 17th of the month and living on credit for the remainder,” says the founder of the green tech scale-up and online marketplace for sustainable consumption. “ The COVID-19 Pandemic has highlighted humanity's ecological impact Since 2018, Earth Overshoot Day has been a regular visitor in the month of July with the exception of 2020 when it occurred on August 22nd. This was due to global lockdowns. “2020 showed how much influence we could have as a society and how it is possible to move the date back again,” says Windischhofer. “Now we have to learn to find ways to move the date further back, even without COVID-19.” Ireland's 2022 Overshoot Day was worryingly on April 21st, much earlier than the world average According to the Central Statistics Office, in 2018 alone, Ireland had the 3rd worst emissions per capita in Europe, with 53% higher emissions per person than the EU average (12.6 tonnes vs. 8.2 tonnes). “If everyone in the world lived the way we Irish do, we would have celebrated Earth Overshoot Day on the 21st of April this year,” says Pádraig Power, Ireland's marketing manager for refurbed, about the unpleasant date. “This concrete figure will hopefully help us recognise Ireland's exuberant consumer behaviour, and help us realise that now is the time to put the steps in place for a greener future. Change has to be easy, otherwise it is not long-term” “It is simply not true that the individual can do nothing,” Founder Windischhofer knows from his own experience. “Everything we do has effects – some stop eating meat, others switch from the car to the train. The pandemic has shown that remote working is possible across the board and that many kilometres in our everyday lives are also simply superfluous,” the committed entrepreneur is convinced. “It is important that we make changes in behaviour easy, pleasant and attainable, only then will they be permanent. Our consumer behaviour is changing. The concept of ‘reuse – recycle – repair' is slowly catching on in people's minds, but every person is different, every person can save CO2 somewhere else. The Earth doesn't care where we save, it only cares that we do it.” Refurbed is a CO2 negative and an environmentally positive organisation – for every product sold, refurbed plants a tree to offset carbon emissions created during the refurbishing process. The trees are planted in countries such as Haiti, Madagascar, Kenya, Indonesia and Mozambique or Nepal through their partnership with Eden Reforestation Projects. The company also plants native trees in woodlands across Ireland as part of their partnership with Reforest Nation. See more stories here. More about Irish Tech News Irish Tech News are Ireland's No. 1 Online Tech Publication and often Ireland's No.1 Tech Podcast too. You can find hundreds of fantastic previous episodes and subscribe using whatever platform you like via our Anchor.fm page here: If you'd like to be featured in an upcoming Podcast email us at Simon@IrishTechNews.ie now to discuss. Irish Tech News have a...

Ab jetzt leben wir auf Pump (Autorin: Susanne Henn)

Informationen, Hintergründe und Meinungen zum tagesaktuellen Geschehen - in Zürich, der Schweiz und international. Kompakt, schnell, aktuell.

We're living as if we had 1.75 planets to work from. Our ecosystems can't regenerate in line with the amount of resources we're using. So, how do we change that and create truly circular societies. In this podcast, we put the focus on what cities can do to stop ‘overshoot day.' In this podcast, the Stockholm Resilience Centre is calling on cities and countries to appoint Chief Engineers to put together the best engineering and design minds together with the finance community to speed up the transformation. We hear from the city of Glasgow, the UN17 village in Copenhagen and also hear about how Turku in Finland has found a way to ensure collaboration across the city thanks to support from ICLEI, a global network of local governments working towards sustainability. Episode guest apperancesAndreas Gyllenhammar, Chief Sustainability Officer, SwecoOwen Gaffney, Director of International Media and Strategy, Stockholm Resilience CentreMarion Guenard, Senior Officer, Circular Development, ICLEI Alison McRae, Senior Director, Glasgow Chamber of CommerceMartin Schultz-Nielsen, Investment Director, NREPAmanda Borneke, Circular economy specialist, SwecoColm O'Callaghan, moderator, Brid Agency About the Urban Insight podcastThe Urban Insight mission is to share solutions for future city planning and initiate a dialogue about sustainable urban development. Since 2018, Sweco's Urban Insight initiative has reached more than 31 million people through news, press and media. During 2022, the Urban Insight podcast will focus on circularity and the key role of cities in achieving this. https://www.swecourbaninsight.com/ See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

The planet is undeniably at risk, and we all have a part to play in ensuring its survival, particularly in our businesses' supply chains.Future Planet is leveraging AI to speed up our essential shift to sustainability, and at the heart of Founder Donal Daly's mission is one question from his son - Will the planet still be OK when I'm your age?Tune in to The Company Doctor this week to find out how the steps to sustainability are both an ethical necessity and a competitive advantage.Key takeaways from this episode:Consider the impact of every actionAdvocate and be an activist in your businessLobby your elected officials to make a change

Dalla live Twitch del 16 maggio.A livello mondiale l' Overshoot Day è previsto solitamente per luglio. Se tutto il mondo vivesse come noi, servirebbero 2,7 Terre per arrivare al 31 dicembre.Il 15 maggio per l'Italia è l'Overshoot Day, uno di quegli anniversari che non vorresti ricordare. Per vedere il video completo di Barbascura X citato nella diretta: https://vm.tiktok.com/ZML3UjFa9/?k=1

Serkan Abrecht und Dominik Feusi (Bern Bundeshaus) vom Nebelspalter diskutieren täglich, was in der Schweiz und der Welt aktuell ist und was es für uns bedeutet.

Informationen, Hintergründe und Meinungen zum tagesaktuellen Geschehen - in Zürich, der Schweiz und international. Kompakt, schnell, aktuell.

Hier erfahrt ihr, was diese Woche alles passiert ist (01.05. - 06.05.)

Kai Chan, professor in the institute for resources, environment and sustainability at UBC.

E Sonndeg am Presseclub waren d'Dani Schumacher vum Wort, de Peter Feist vum Land an de Richard Graf vun der Woxx.

Lëtzebuerg féiert alt nees e ganz besonnesche Vältesdag. Ausserdeem: Wéi ass déi lëtzebuergesch Positioun zum Konflikt an der Ukrain a wéi beaflossen d'wirtschaftlech Relatiounen tëscht Lëtzebuerg a Russland dës Positioun?

Eng Carte Blanche vum woxx-Journalist Richard Graf zu engem Exploit, dee Lëtzebuerg guer net gutt zu Gesiicht steet.

July 29th came in just like another day   People went through their daily lives, like just another day...    But after 155 days in 2021, we have reached Earth Overshoot day   (a day that marks the moment in time when demand for earth's ecological resources exceeds what the planet can regenerate.)   And each year, this day comes in earlier and earlier...   Its halfway through the year, and humans have already surpassed what global resources can sustain in a single year   The lumber we can sustainably harvest, the fisheries we fish, the ore we mine, the pollution we put in our waters...   Our planet needs a break…    Here's how we can make a difference    Think about our demand for stuff. Is it necessary?  Is it resource intensive?  Can we shift your demand toward the “reuse” economy?   Advocate for initiatives that your employer can take. Ask: Do we have a sustainability and equity commitment and are we actively executing on it? How do we source our products? Are there alternatives? How are we tracking and reducing our carbon footprint?   Show up at the ballot box. Look up your local, state, and federal leadership and put the pressure on. Support and elect leadership strong on climate and environmental justice.   Call, email, tag, tweet at your leaders. They see these messages. Have a relationship with your leaders and demand actions. Hold them accountable, but also give praise where praise is due.   Engage at whatever level you can manage This translates to pushing the overshoot date back and ultimately reestablishing ecosystem balance.    Our planet needs us.    #overshootday cop26 #UNClimateConference     ☀️ If you enjoyed this episode, please share with a friend!   Connect with Sháán díín Cedar  Hosted by Frank Oscar Weaver Soundscapes by Movix Productions

Een wild gevarieerde tafel met allerlei onderwerpen gaande van Overshoot Day, Zoom-dismorfie. Ook gaat Philip uitgebreid in op een aantal commentaren (zodat u dat niet hoeft). Kijk voor alle info en links op de praattafel.be --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/praattafel/message

This episode discussed world overshoot day, what it means, offers various examples, includes how calculating overshoot day is possible, why this is a problem and discusses sustainable solutions! --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/icebreakerpodcast/message

Everything your friends, family, colleagues, journalists and elected representatives need to know about Earth Overshoot Day. Every other week, another scientific report is added to the stack of evidence human civilization has outgrown the planet. What are we doing about it? Earth Overshoot Day is the point in time during the year at which we've already burned through the renewable resources it takes the Earth a year to regenerate. Earth Overshoot Day in 2021 is July 29. Global Footprint Network continuously analyzes UN data and satellite imagery to estimate the planet's capacity to meet our needs (biocapacity), and humankind's footprint - or demand (ecological footprint) - on that capacity. According to their analysis, we're demanding almost twice what the planet can sustainably provide. In the U.S. and a few other nations, we're engaged in 5-planet living (U.S. Overshoot Day was March 14). Every year as Earth Overshoot Day approaches, we dedicate an episode of the GrowthBusters podcast to playing an audio documentary we produced in 2019. Welcome to Overshoot: Have a Nice Day explores overshoot's causes, effects, and possible solutions, as well as some of the barriers to solving the problem. LINKS: Earth Overshoot Day https://www.overshootday.org/ The Limits to Growth http://donellameadows.org/the-limits-to-growth-now-available-to-read-online/ Conversation Earth - Radio Series/Podcast http://www.conversationearth.org/episode-list Reported by: Dave Gardner Interviews: William Catton, author of Overshoot: The Ecological Basis of Revolutionary Change Brian Czech, author of Supply Shock: Economic Growth at the Crossroads and the Steady State Solution, and executive director of the Center for the Advancement of the Steady State Economy Herman Daly, author of Beyond Growth: The Economics of Sustainable Development Paul Ehrlich, Stanford Biologist, author of The Population Bomb Kerryn Higgs, author of Collision Course: Endless Growth on a Finite Planet Ian Johnson, former World Bank vice president, former secretary general of Club of Rome Bill McKibben, environmental journalist, author of Falter: Has the Human Game Begun to Play Itself Out?, co-founder of 350.org. Dennis Meadows, lead scientist, The Limits to Growth Kate Raworth, author of Doughnut Economics: 7 Ways to Think Like a 21st Century Economist William Rees, co-originator of ecological footprint analysis Bill Ryerson, President of Population Media Center and Chair of Population Institute Juliet Schor, Professor of Sociology at Boston University and author of Plenitude: The New Economics of True Wealth John Seager, CEO of Population Connection Gus Speth, former chair, White House Council on Environmental Quality Mathis Wackernagel, founder of Global Footprint Network and co-author of Ecological Footprint: Managing Our Biocapacity Budget Rex Weyler, environmental journalist On the GrowthBusters podcast, we come to terms with the limits to growth, explore the joy of sustainable living, and provide a recovery program for our society's growth addiction (economic/consumption and population). This podcast is part of the GrowthBusters project to raise awareness of overshoot and end our culture's obsession with, and pursuit of, growth. Dave Gardner directed the documentary GrowthBusters: Hooked on Growth, which Stanford Biologist Paul Ehrlich declared “could be the most important film ever made.” Join the conversation on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/GrowthBustersPodcast/ Make a donation to support this non-profit project. https://www.growthbusters.org/donate/ Archive of GrowthBusters podcast episodes http://www.growthbusters.org/podcast/ Subscribe to GrowthBusters email updates https://lp.constantcontact.com/su/umptf6w/signup See the film – GrowthBusters: Hooked on Growth http:www.growthbustersmovie.org Explore the issues at http://www.growthbusters.org View the GrowthBusters channel on YouTube Follow the podcast so you don't miss an episode:

Happy (or not-so-happy) Earth Overshoot Day. July 29 is 2021's Overshoot Day. What does that mean? Learn about #MovetheDate, how to calculate your own ecological footprint, and global resource depletion. Visit overshootday.org and footprintnetwork.org for more information. Check us out at climatefocusedfuture.org.

Greta nos cuenta más sobre el overshoot day y además sobre la nueva normativa para verdulerias y otros negocios que deben dejar el plastico de un solo uso.

Global Footprint Network, entro fine anno servono 2,7 Terre.

Verräterische Email - Verbrecherjagd durch Sprachanalyse / Corona-Impfung - Auch Kinder und Schwangere immunisieren? / Leben auf Pump durch Ressourcenverbrauch - German Overshoot Day.

Australia ranks 12th in the date it uses its natural resource allowance for the year. What is the underlying logic of this that we need to repent of? How does an organization like Extinction Rebellion show the way forward?

Ever wondered how you can get involved in the climate crisis discussion? Charlotte and Fernanda take you along their own environmental journeys. Listen as the pair exchange personal stories and also reminisce about shared memories. Follow us on Instagram! @4cornersproject Check out the Extinction Rebellion project here. Learn more about Overshoot Day here. Check out the climate justice article by The New Yorker here. Check out the Kansas University study here.

Overshoot Day — the day when our resource consumption exceeds planetary capacity — fell on August 22 this year. In other words, we’re living on borrowed time and starting to pay the price with climate change, sea-level rise, and biodiversity loss. The date is calculated by the Global Footprint Network (GFN), a key ally in advancing the steady state economy. In this episode of The Steady Stater, Brian Czech interviews his first guest on the podcast, GFN CEO Laurel Hanscom.

Last Saturday, the 22nd of August, was Earth Overshoot Day 2020. It marked the day humanity consumed a year’s worth of the Earth's resources - more than what can be regenerated in a year. We give you the 411 on what this day is all about, and discuss what steps need to be taken, to #MoveTheDate back. Image Source: Pxfuel

Ma il 22 agosto avremo esaurito le risorse annuali del Pianeta

Am 8. Mai ist Schweizer «Overshoot Day». Es ist der Tag des laufenden Jahres, an dem die menschliche Nachfrage nach nachwachsenden Rohstoffen die Kapazität der Natur zur Erneuerung dieser Ressourcen innerhalb eines Jahres übersteigt. Madame Frigo versucht, den Overshoot Day mit öffentlichen Kühlschränken nach hinten zu verschieben.

Vergilius "Georgica" är en cirka 2050 år gammal guide till att bruka jorden. Dan Jönsson använder den för att utforska vår djupa relation till marken vi går på. ESSÄ: Detta är en text där skribenten reflekterar över ett ämne eller ett verk. Åsikter som uttrycks är skribentens egna. En bekant till mig brukar säga att det är nyttigt att få i sig lite jord ibland. Det ska vara bra för metabolismen och dessutom är det ju en känd sak att gravida kvinnor ofta blir sugna på just att äta jord. Faktum är att jag tror det finns ett djupare skäl till det där suget, något som inte bara har att göra med att kroppen signalerar brist på vissa mineraler utan bottnar i något långt mer primitivt, en urdrift. Njutningen i att ligga och rensa en rabatt eller ett trädgårdsland handlar ju bara delvis om att skapa ordning bland perenner och köksväxter den består minst lika mycket i att släppa på den inpiskade rädslan för att smutsa ner sig, få känna leran kladda mellan fingrarna, jorden tränga in under naglarna och skiten torka in i hudens porer. Jag tänker att vad det i grunden handlar om är att överskrida den där gränsen som vi kommit överens om separerar kropp och värld, på nytt bli det lilla barnet som man var en gång, när gränsen fortfarande inte existerade, eller rättare sagt, när den var obegriplig, och man smakade på och körde fingrarna i allt. För att förstå. Men förstå vad? Den romerske poeten Vergilius undrar i sin lärodikt om jordbruket, Georgica: Säg, varför/ skyr vi de mödor det innebär att plantera och odla? Frågan ställs lite ut i det blå, mitt i ett prydligt redovisande avsnitt om skogsbruk och fruktodling, som om Vergilius plötsligt stannat upp i präntandet, kanske distraherad av en fluga, och kastat en blick genom fönstret när det slagit honom att detta arbete han beskriver i vår civilisation är något vi i själva verket helst vill undslippa och komma bort från fast vi sällan erkänner det, ens för oss själva. Och mycket riktigt, redan i nästa strof är han tillbaka i arbetsetiken, lägger ut texten om de vilda trädens nyttofunktioner, beskriver hur man tar tillvara ved och byggmaterial från stormfällen. Jag får ett intryck av vad som i psykoanalysen brukar kallas sublimering: den präktiga arbetsbeskrivningen som undanmanöver, runt ett tomrum, en avgrund, av mörka, ociviliserade begär. Eller kanske en urskräck. När jag ligger där med fingrarna i myllan kommer jag att tänka på en hemsk passage i David Grossmans roman På flykt från ett sorgebud där Avram, en av huvudpersonerna minns hur han under sin krigsfångenskap en gång tvingades utstå en tortyr som innebar att bli begravd levande. Grossman beskriver proceduren i detalj: den hårda stöten av en jordkoka som träffar honom mitt i ansiktet, svedan i ögonen, jordsmulorna som snabbt rinner ner bakom öronen därefter den förlamande dödsångesten, en ring av kall skräck slöt sig runt hans hjärta, skriver Grossman och fortsätter den minutiösa beskrivningen; munnen stängdes för att hålla jorden ute, och munnen slets upp för att andas jord, och halsen är jord och lungorna jord och tårna sträcks för att andas in och ögonen tränger ut ur sina hålor Åkern, graven. Mellan två sår i marken utspelar sig den civiliserade människans liv. Åkern och graven: jorden lånar oss av sin livskraft i utbyte mot att en gång få sluka och smälta oss. Det kan låta som ett hårt och grymt kontrakt men utan det skulle civilisationen och kulturen inte vara möjlig. I Georgica förklarar Vergilius hur bonden ska gå tillväga för att pröva om hans jord är lämpad för en viss gröda nämligen genom att knåda och smaka på den: jord som inte går att odla säd i är omisskännlig, skriver han: den är besk, och alla som provar/ skall med en äcklad grimas förvrida strax sina munnar. Mer än tvåtusen år har gått sedan dess, men när jag läser de raderna ser jag Vergilius bonde för mig alldeles livs levande, där han står med jord på tungan och grimaserar. Jag har svårt att tänka mig en mänskligare scen, något som skarpare får människan att avteckna sig mot sina grundvillkor: mitt i kretsloppet, mitt i livets grymma cirkel. Och människan vore väl inte människa om hon inte genom hela sin historia hade försökt överlista jorden. Bryta cirkeln. Från mitten på 1800-talet, när jordbruket började mekaniseras, har de genomsnittliga skördarna i den rika världen tiodubblats, samtidigt som arbetsinsatsen per hektar har minskat till ungefär en trettiondel från 150 timmar till 5. Säga vad man vill: det är en makalös utveckling, som har fört med sig att där nio tiondelar av Sveriges befolkning arbetade i jordbruket i slutet på 1800-talet, är den siffran idag nere på några enstaka procent. Nästan ingenting av det vi idag förstår som det moderna livet av materiell trygghet och välfärd, men också av politisk frihet och ökad jämlikhet hade varit möjligt utan den. I den meningen är cirkeln faktiskt bruten. Men i och med det har vi istället påbörjat en ny. No man made the land, skrev John Stuart Mill; det stämmer inte längre. Ingen annan naturkraft förflyttar idag så mycket jord-, sand- och stenmassor som människan. Redan Karl Marx talade om bortschackrandet av jorden: tendensen att den levande jorden blir en ekonomisk resurs, att biologins processer begreppsmässigt blandas ihop med kapitalismens vinstprinciper. Näring som näring gröda blir detsamma som avkastning, något som skapar föreställningen om en tillväxt utan gräns. Idag börjar vi se vart den har lett oss. Den så kallade Overshoot Day, dagen när jordens resurser för året anses förbrukade, firas numera i slutet av juli. Ännu så sent som på sjuttiotalet inföll den i mellandagarna mellan jul och nyår; hela vår ekologiska skuld har alltså byggts upp på bara något halvsekel. Och jorden svarar på människans kontraktsbrott läcker tungmetaller, vägrar låta haven absorbera våra plastsopor, får öknarna att sprida sig och insekterna att försvinna. Av allt detta anade förstås Vergilius ingenting. Men även i Georgica, som i mycket annan antik litteratur, hörs alltså en underton av civilisationskritik. Subtil, men distinkt. Precis som i den bibliska historien, där odlandets vedermödor drabbar människan som Herrens straff för syndafallet, lever genom den klassiska kulturen myten om Guldåldern, ett fjärran förflutet när människorna under Saturnus milda regim levde i harmoni med sin omvärld och arbetet på fälten inte förde till ödeläggelse och krig. Som Vergilius skriver: ingen/ hade då ännu hört trumpeter mana till drabbning/ ingen dånet från hårda städ när man hamrade svärden. Någonstans i vårt undermedvetna bär vi på det gemensamma minnet av Paradiset, Guldåldern. Kan det vara därför, kanske, som vi skyr odlandets mödor? Så onödigt, egentligen. Även om dagens jordbruk bara var hälften så effektivt det vill säga, om det var helt och hållet ekologiskt så hade den saturniska guldåldern kunnat vara återinförd för länge sedan. Istället sprider sig öknarna. Jag tror det är det här vi måste förstå, om en annan och bättre civilisation ska vara möjlig: den brutna cirkeln är en illusion, vår ekologiska skuld är inget annat än en gigantisk ekonomisk bubbla, alla bubblors moder, som när den brister kommer att låta kontraktet slå igen om oss med full kraft. Som filosofen Martin Heidegger undrade: Finns jorden i vårt huvud? Eller är jorden något vi står på? Att svara på den frågan är att, konkret, ta ställning. Prova hur det känns när man rör vid marken. Kanske rentav se till att få lite jord i munnen då och då. Dan Jönsson, författare och essäist Litteratur Vergilius: Georgica. Tolkad av Ingvar Björkeson. Natur & kultur, 2019.

Sedan 50-talet har mänsklighetens och samhällets tillväxt ökat exponentiellt. Man brukar prata om ”Den Stora Accelerationen”. Men samtidigt har naturligtvis konsekvenserna också ökat exponentiellt. Trots mycket prat om att frikoppla vår ekonomiska tillväxt från resursanvändningen pekar alla kurvor på en fortsatt nästan ”skenade” ökning av resursanvändningen. I det här avsnittet tittar vi lite övergripande på mänsklighetens resursanvändning. Vi tittar på jordens kapacitet att producera resurser. Vi pratar om ekologiska fotavtryck, ”overshoot day”, globala hektar och den svenska livsstilen. Läs mer på www.thefuture.se

En simpel maträtt som innehåller bra med goda egenskaper? Såklart snackar vi om hummus! Vilka är våra favoritrecept? Har vi några extra bra hummus-minnen? I avsnittet tar vi också upp allvarligare ämnen: kampanjen "Gilla Gris" och "Overshoot Day".

El overshoot day es el día en que nos demuestra en cuánto tiempo consumimos los recursos disponibles para un año. El tiempo nos ha demostrado que estamos excediendo lo que el planeta nos puede dar y solo nos queda preguntarnos ¿Cuánto tiempo aguantará el planeta antes de colapsar por completo? Sígueme en mis redes sociales: Perfil Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/charlasverdes/?hl=es-la Perfil Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/FelipePuerto6/?ref=bookmarks Perfil Twitter: https://twitter.com/Felipe_Puerto6 --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/felipe-puerto0/message

Overshoot Day 2010 var min "tipping point". Nu är vi här 9 år senare och Overshoot Day 2019 sker tidigare än någonsin. Följ på instagram:https://www.instagram.com/hallbarprofilpodcast/ Håll Hållbarprofil podcast reklamfri! Stötta via paetron: https://www.patreon.com/hallbarprofilpodcast 

Premiär Overshoot Day 29 juli 2019!  Tack för att du lyssnar på Hållbarprofil podcast! Stötta mitt arbete på Patreon.com/hallbarprofilpodcast.

L’overshoot day è il giorno in cui l’umanità ha consumato interamente le risorse che la Terra riesce a rigenerare in un anno è stato il 10 maggio 2019. Che cosa succede ora? E come facciamo a rimediare?Martina Ottaviano, Napoli

Seit Dienstag 7. Mai 2019 leben wir in der Schweiz auf Kosten der kommenden Generationen.

Vi snackar om Overshoot Day - dagen då vi förbrukat årets resurser. Magnus har en lösning! Lyssna på vad den skulle innebära. Olle pratar om att aldrig mer köpa kläder. In och lyssna, dela och gilla!

Did you know we are in overshoot? What does that mean, and what should we do about it? Also in this episode, which has a smaller footprint – milk, or milk alternatives like almond milk? Dana informs us that, “Eating food is one of the worst things you can do for the environment.” Are some health departments preventing bulk filling of reusable containers? Carrying reusable utensils and napkin on your travels. And choosing carefully the trash can in which to deposit your refuse. August 1, 2018 is Earth Overshoot Day. Data collected and analyzed by the Global Footprint Network tells us this is the date when humanity’s annual demand on nature begins to exceed what Earth’s ecosystems can regenerate in the entire year. If it falls anytime before December 31, it means we’re using more ecological resources and services than nature can regenerate - through activity like overfishing, overharvesting forests, and emitting more carbon dioxide into the atmosphere than ecosystems can absorb. According to Global Footprint Network’s co-founder, Mathis Wackernagel, “Our current economies are running a Ponzi scheme with our planet…. We are borrowing the Earth’s future resources to operate our economies in the present. Like any Ponzi scheme, this works for some time. But as nations, companies, or households dig themselves deeper and deeper into debt, they eventually fall apart.” Dana and Dave interview random people to find out: Are they aware of Earth Overshoot Day? Do they know we’re in overshoot and what that is? What are their ideas for delaying the date? Check out our Overshoot Day interview video here. Please share it, and let us know what you’re doing to #movethedate. We welcome your comments, emails and tweets. And watch the GrowthBusters podcast Facebook page or Global Footprint Network’s page for the #MoveTheDate live stream on August 1 at noon U.S. Eastern Daylight Time. LINKS: Overshoot Day Website GrowthBusters Earth Overshoot Day Video Video: Earth Overshoot Day Falls on August 1, 2018 Footprint Data Solutions Share your actions Footprint calculator The Four Lifestyle Choices that Most Reduce Your Carbon Footprint (Lund University study) When It Comes to Nut Milk, What’s the Most Sustainable Option?  Is Almond Milk Bad for the Planet? Environmental & Social Impacts of Soy Benefits of Pea Milk Drink Pea Milk and Save the World: But What If The Peas are Shipped from France?

Depois de mais de mais uma pausa forçada, os 28 minutos mais verdes da rádio regressam para a penúltima emissão desta temporada!Para o regresso, o Hugo e a Laura prepararam uma compilação das mais recentes novidades sobre o plástico. O tema não é novo mas teve bastante em discussão no inicio do mês de Junho, em especial durante as comemorações do Dia Mundial do Ambiente. Mas não só de plástico se faz esta emissão. Portugal atingiu o seu "Overshoot Day" de 2018 no passado dia 16 de Junho e discutimos o consumo de recursos dos portugueses! Não sabem o que é o "Overshoot Day"?! Fiquem a saber nesta emissão.Se estiveram desatentos as novidades, fiquem a saber tudo na emissão desta semana!Notícias da semana:- Bruxelas quer banir a venda de cotonetes e palhinhas em plástico;- Zero diz que medidas contra plásticos são interessantes, mas faltam metas específicas;- Parlamento aprova projecto de lei do PAN para sistema de incentivo e depósito de embalagens;- Portugal esgota recursos naturais de 2018 e começa a usar "cartão de crédito ambiental";

President Trump’s ban on letting transgender people serve in the military is not very popular among voters. Transcripts of phone calls from early in Trump’s presidency show he knew Mexico would never pay for his border wall. World Overshoot Day fell on August 2 this year, earliest it’s ever been. Links: • Voters broadly support transgender people serving in the military, poll finds • 5 of the most damning quotes from Trump’s conversations with the leaders of Mexico, Australia • World Overshoot Day: Humans have used up a year’s worth of natural resources in just 7 months See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Gary Holthaus