Confiscation of assets by the state
POPULARITY
Zelensky's booted from the White House in a meme-fueled meltdown, while the EU's army dreams vanish like CO2 — can't have a military industrial complex when you've de-industrialized. Starmer's UK brags ‘boots and planes,' but Russia has to wipe off a smirk-ov. Musk and & Massie push a NATO exit. Crypto's a con—$200M bets and Fort Knox audits mask a cash grab. English-only? Money's the real language of US govt. Fentanyl lies fuel tariffs, cops rob drivers blind for “smuggling cash, and Texas hides 2,300 pedo-teachers as the CIA pimps trans clinics in India.2:00White House Meltdown as Trump Kicks Out Ukraine's ‘Comedian Puppet' After a heated clash filled with insults, lies, and a humiliating ejection, the ‘little guy' comedian—whose ‘jokes' stink worse than his war games—saw his dreams of endless American handouts crumble. And the entertainment doesn't stop there — the memes are flying—think pacifiers and T-shirts, capped off with the hilarious expressions on the faces of Rubio and the Ukrainian Ambassador. There may be a shortage of eggs, but NOT of egos 34:13EU Dream of an EU Army: Is It Too Late for the Declining Continent?Zelensky is demanding EU microwave Russia's frozen assets for him to feast on — far more than the $177B he stole from USA ($100B of which he doesn't know the whereabouts). After pampering their citizens with welfare and being pampered with state welfare from USA for 80 years, can they get it together? Even IF they could summon the will, the “green” deindustrialization has them deep within the hole they dug for themselves 46:09“Boots on the Ground, Planes in the Air”?Bravado from UK PM Keir Starmer. But how does UK stack up against Russia militarily? 53:13Musk, Massie, and Mike Lee Plot U.S. Exit from NATO“Toss the cold war relic into the Smithsonian dumpster”. If we don't exit NATO, will the EU warmongers drag us into yet another European World War? 57:56 LIVE comments from audience1:05:25Robert E Lee vs Zelensky: Is the Ukraine War a “Just War”?Yes, there's a right to self-defense but that's NOT THE ONLY CRITERIA 1:09:16Trump's Crypto CurveBall: “Bitcoin Reserve” is NOT About BTC Ignoring Bitcoin Trump hyped XRP, Solana, and Cardano for a U.S. strategic reserve, only to backtrack and crown BTC and ETH the ‘heart' after a firestorm. - So what's he and his crypto-conspirators up to? - And what about that $200 MILLION insider bet? CBDC is turning into PPP-DC (Public Private Partnership Digital Currency) 1:28:14What's the PURPOSE for the CIRCUS? How Will Trump and Musk Use the Ft Knox “Audit”? Swiss banker scoffs at Bitcoin as a reserve for SEVERAL very good reasons. But Fort Knox audit and $200 trillion land grabs expose the chaos plan to trash trust in everything but Musk and Trump. 1:44:38 LIVE comments from audience 1:54:15 Trump's “English Only” Exec Order: MONEY is the REAL Language of Government, Especially the Trump AdministrationActually the pushback against Bill Clinton's mandate to use non-English is a LOT more nuanced. While hockey fans boo Canada over tariffs and influencers peddle fentanyl lies, Trump and Musk are shredding the rule of law for profit. Is this America's last stand or a chaotic con to auction it all off?" 2:10:39 Trump's Lying About the Canadian Fentanyl Crisis as an Excuse for TariffsSo who is the biggest supplier of fentanyl? 2:12:28“Smuggling Cash” is a Crime. Should It Be?Cops snatch ‘cartel cash' from drivers whose crime is “smuggling cash”. They want us to believe that after 54 yrs of a failed “War on Drugs”, we're winning? This isn't a Drug War—it's a war on, the Constitution, your God-given rights protected by the Constitution, and your wallet! “Civil Forfeiture”? Cops are not to be involved in “civil” procedures and “forfeiture” is just another name for THEFT WITHOUT DUE PROCESS 2:25:49 LIVE comments from audience 2:30:15Texas Hides 2,300 Pedophile Teachers, CIA Pushes Trans Chaos in India, Thieves Snag Ten CommandmentsTexas schools hiding 2,300 predator teachers and abortion pills driving women to despair. The CIA/USAID is up to darker deeds, funding transgender clinics in India to spread demonic chaos.If you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-show Or you can send a donation throughMail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Zelle: @DavidKnightShow@protonmail.comCash App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Money should have intrinsic value AND transactional privacy: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silverFor 10% off Gerald Celente's prescient Trends Journal, go to TrendsJournal.com and enter the code KNIGHTFor 10% off supplements and books, go to RNCstore.com and enter the code KNIGHTBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.
Zelensky's booted from the White House in a meme-fueled meltdown, while the EU's army dreams vanish like CO2 — can't have a military industrial complex when you've de-industrialized. Starmer's UK brags ‘boots and planes,' but Russia has to wipe off a smirk-ov. Musk and & Massie push a NATO exit. Crypto's a con—$200M bets and Fort Knox audits mask a cash grab. English-only? Money's the real language of US govt. Fentanyl lies fuel tariffs, cops rob drivers blind for “smuggling cash, and Texas hides 2,300 pedo-teachers as the CIA pimps trans clinics in India.2:00White House Meltdown as Trump Kicks Out Ukraine's ‘Comedian Puppet' After a heated clash filled with insults, lies, and a humiliating ejection, the ‘little guy' comedian—whose ‘jokes' stink worse than his war games—saw his dreams of endless American handouts crumble. And the entertainment doesn't stop there — the memes are flying—think pacifiers and T-shirts, capped off with the hilarious expressions on the faces of Rubio and the Ukrainian Ambassador. There may be a shortage of eggs, but NOT of egos 34:13EU Dream of an EU Army: Is It Too Late for the Declining Continent?Zelensky is demanding EU microwave Russia's frozen assets for him to feast on — far more than the $177B he stole from USA ($100B of which he doesn't know the whereabouts). After pampering their citizens with welfare and being pampered with state welfare from USA for 80 years, can they get it together? Even IF they could summon the will, the “green” deindustrialization has them deep within the hole they dug for themselves 46:09“Boots on the Ground, Planes in the Air”?Bravado from UK PM Keir Starmer. But how does UK stack up against Russia militarily? 53:13Musk, Massie, and Mike Lee Plot U.S. Exit from NATO“Toss the cold war relic into the Smithsonian dumpster”. If we don't exit NATO, will the EU warmongers drag us into yet another European World War? 57:56 LIVE comments from audience1:05:25Robert E Lee vs Zelensky: Is the Ukraine War a “Just War”?Yes, there's a right to self-defense but that's NOT THE ONLY CRITERIA 1:09:16Trump's Crypto CurveBall: “Bitcoin Reserve” is NOT About BTC Ignoring Bitcoin Trump hyped XRP, Solana, and Cardano for a U.S. strategic reserve, only to backtrack and crown BTC and ETH the ‘heart' after a firestorm. - So what's he and his crypto-conspirators up to? - And what about that $200 MILLION insider bet? CBDC is turning into PPP-DC (Public Private Partnership Digital Currency) 1:28:14What's the PURPOSE for the CIRCUS? How Will Trump and Musk Use the Ft Knox “Audit”? Swiss banker scoffs at Bitcoin as a reserve for SEVERAL very good reasons. But Fort Knox audit and $200 trillion land grabs expose the chaos plan to trash trust in everything but Musk and Trump. 1:44:38 LIVE comments from audience 1:54:15 Trump's “English Only” Exec Order: MONEY is the REAL Language of Government, Especially the Trump AdministrationActually the pushback against Bill Clinton's mandate to use non-English is a LOT more nuanced. While hockey fans boo Canada over tariffs and influencers peddle fentanyl lies, Trump and Musk are shredding the rule of law for profit. Is this America's last stand or a chaotic con to auction it all off?" 2:10:39 Trump's Lying About the Canadian Fentanyl Crisis as an Excuse for TariffsSo who is the biggest supplier of fentanyl? 2:12:28“Smuggling Cash” is a Crime. Should It Be?Cops snatch ‘cartel cash' from drivers whose crime is “smuggling cash”. They want us to believe that after 54 yrs of a failed “War on Drugs”, we're winning? This isn't a Drug War—it's a war on, the Constitution, your God-given rights protected by the Constitution, and your wallet! “Civil Forfeiture”? Cops are not to be involved in “civil” procedures and “forfeiture” is just another name for THEFT WITHOUT DUE PROCESS 2:25:49 LIVE comments from audience 2:30:15Texas Hides 2,300 Pedophile Teachers, CIA Pushes Trans Chaos in India, Thieves Snag Ten CommandmentsTexas schools hiding 2,300 predator teachers and abortion pills driving women to despair. The CIA/USAID is up to darker deeds, funding transgender clinics in India to spread demonic chaos.If you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-show Or you can send a donation throughMail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Zelle: @DavidKnightShow@protonmail.comCash App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Money should have intrinsic value AND transactional privacy: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silverFor 10% off Gerald Celente's prescient Trends Journal, go to TrendsJournal.com and enter the code KNIGHTFor 10% off supplements and books, go to RNCstore.com and enter the code KNIGHTBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-real-david-knight-show--5282736/support.
On this week's episode, Kyla Lee and Paul Doroshenko explore vehicle-related crimes, the role of apps like Turo in violent acts, and two wild snake-in-car stories that steal the show. Check out the "Lawyer Told Me Not To Talk To You" T-shirts and hoodies at Lawyertoldme.com and "Sit Still Jackson" at sitstilljackson.com Follow Kyla Lee on Twitter: twitter.com/IRPlawyer Follow Kyla Lee on Instagram: instagram.com/kylaleelawyer
The Rich Zeoli Show- Hour 2: 4:00pm- Amy Sterner Nelson—Attorney, Entrepreneur, and Writer/Founder of the Riveter—joins The Rich Zeoli Show to discuss her latest article for The Blaze, “Civil Forfeiture Turns Lives Upside Down, Ruins Families—Just Like Mine.” She explains that her husband was never ultimately charged with any crimes, however, the government confiscated her family's possessions and savings anyway. She heartbreakingly reveals that her “children could have starved” as a consequence of the government's unjust actions. You can read the article here: https://www.theblaze.com/columns/opinion/civil-forfeiture-turns-lives-upside-down-ruins-families-just-like-mine 4:30pm- Jack Ciattarelli—Republican Candidate for Governor of New Jersey & Former New Jersey State Representative—joins The Rich Zeoli Show to talk about the New Jersey Gubernatorial race.
When the FBI searched hundreds of safe deposit boxes, they kept the contents of safes containing more than $5000 in cash or valuables. A challenge is now in federal circuit court in Washington, DC. Tommy Berry explains what the court should do. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
In Mississippi. https://www.lehtoslaw.com
“The bad guys are going to continue to find ways to hide money in plain sight.”In this episode, Asset Reality's US Compliance Officer David Tyree shares his experiences with asset seizures while working as a Resident Agent in Charge at the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA).David explores the complexities of non-conviction-based forfeiture with our host Aidan Larkin, emphasising the importance of tracing the assets back to criminal activities and the influence of adverse media on law enforcement decisions.They also delve into the global challenges in asset recovery, consider how public and private sector partnerships can help tackle future obstacles in the field, explore the social reuse of seized assets and discuss why criminals prefer jail time over asset confiscation. Timestamps00:00 - Special Announcement - Register for Seize: London00:00 - Special Announcement - Virtual Assets Transfer Fundamentals Certification04:30 - Fighting Crime Through Asset Forfeiture07:40 - Navigating Controversies in Civil Asset Forfeiture18:00 - The Challenges of Seizing Cash24:00 - Civil Forfeiture Process Explained29:30 - Opportunities in Global Asset Recovery36:00 - Reinvesting Seized Assets for Community Benefit40:30 - Solutions in Crypto Asset Seizure and ForfeitureResources MentionedUnited States v. Gonzales, No. 18-8017 (10th Cir. 2019) :: JustiaMan indicted on money laundering, marijuana charges | Wyoming | gillettenewsrecord.comColorado, Wyoming restaurants accused of laundering drug money (denverpost.com)UNODC Factsheet: Money-laundering and related illicit financial activities About our GuestDavid Tyree is the US Compliance Officer for Asset Reality, following a 25-year career as a Special Agent for the United States Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA). Throughout his service, David specialised in identifying, disrupting and dismantling sophisticated money laundering networks around the world, with a strong emphasis on investigating Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs) which resulted in the forfeiture of over $80 million in criminal proceeds.Since 2004, David has been a regular instructor for the Department of Justice's Money Laundering and Asset Recovery Section (MLARS), the United States Attorney's Office and the United States Department of Justice. Based on David's successful contributions to asset forfeiture in the US, he was designated in Federal Court as a money laundering detection and prevention subject matter expert and also consults as a subject matter expert for assetforfeiturelaw.us.DisclaimerOur podcasts are for informational purposes only. They are not intended to provide legal, tax, financial, and/or investment advice. Listeners must consult their own advisors before making decisions on the topics discussed. Asset Reality has no responsibility or liability for any decision made or any other acts or omissions in connection with your use of this material.The views expressed by guests are their own and their appearance on the program does not imply an endorsement of them or any entity they represent. Views and opinions expressed by Asset Reality employees are those of the employees and do not necessarily reflect the views of the company. Asset Reality does not guarantee or warrant the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, suitability or validity of the information in any particular podcast and will not be responsible for any claim attributable to errors, omissions, or other inaccuracies of any part of such material. Unless stated otherwise, reference to any specific product or entity does not constitute an endorsement or recommendation by Asset Reality.
Topics Include: - Ref ball - Explosive plays - Civil Forfeiture
“No one's taking action without a court order.”In this special episode, we explore the complexities of cryptocurrency seizures with Joanna Summers, our SVP of Client Relations and resident seized asset specialist, after an extended introduction from David Tyree, our US Compliance Officer and former Resident Agent in Charge at the DEA.Aidan and Joanna unpack the latest asset seizure headlines and discuss the nuances of dealing with seized assets, including the legal and operational challenges of maintaining their value for eventual disposal or return.They also touch on the speculative nature of cryptocurrency, the ongoing debate around privacy coins, and the potential future of cryptocurrency seizure and management policies.Don't forget to register for Asset Reality's seized asset webinar on Thursday, 29th August, at 3pm BST (10am ET) to join us as we review the latest industry best practices and discover practical ways to enhance asset seizure, management and disposal processes in the public sector.Register to secure your spot today: https://us06web.zoom.us/webinar/register/7217245339671/WN_8AkKbl-LQEm-xLkS3kksGg Timestamps00:00 - Register for Asset Reality's Seized Asset Webinar01:00 - Extended Introduction from David Tyree06:00 - Aidan's introduction07:00 - Joanna's background08:30 - Legalities of handling seized assets11:00 - Complexities of government seizures16:45 - US attitudes towards privacy coins25:30 - Civil forfeiture vs criminal forfeiture29:00 - Safely disposing of cryptocurrencies37:40 - Social reuse of seized assets39:45 - Extended outro from David TyreeResources MentionedTrump's Plan for US Bitcoin Stockpile Alarms Forfeiture Experts - BloombergCzech police turn seized Ferrari into patrol car | Czech Republic | The GuardianWhy the presidential election could be decided by young crypto voters NAVIGATING THE PATH TO RESPECTABILITY: Crypto Assets Report - UK Finance 'Privacy coin' Monero offers near total anonymity | Reuters The German government owns around $2 billion in bitcoin — and it's freaking out crypto investors. About our GuestJoanna Summers is the Senior Vice President of Client Relations and resident seized asset specialist at Asset Reality.As the former Assistant Chief of the Asset Forfeiture Division Complex Assets Unit at the U.S. Marshals Service (USMS) Joanna led her team to build the USMS Cryptocurrency program, beginning with the landmark Silk Road Bitcoin seizure.Under her guidance, the program oversaw the custody, management, and disposal of all ongoing business and complex financial instruments that are subject to forfeiture, evolving from conducting sealed bid auctions to implementing a streamlined liquidation process via cryptocurrency exchanges.DisclaimerOur podcasts are for informational purposes only. They are not intended to provide legal, tax, financial, and/or investment advice. Listeners must consult their own advisors before making decisions on the topics discussed. Asset Reality has no responsibility or liability for any decision made or any other acts or omissions in connection with your use of this material.The views expressed by guests are their own and their appearance on the program does not imply an endorsement of them or any entity they represent. Views and opinions expressed by Asset Reality employees are those of the employees and do not necessarily reflect the views of the company. Asset Reality does not guarantee or warrant the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, suitability or validity of the information in any particular podcast and will not be responsible for any claim attributable to errors, omissions, or other inaccuracies of any part of such material. Unless stated otherwise, reference to any specific product or entity does not constitute an endorsement or recommendation by Asset Reality.
“You have to fight AI with AI.” In this episode, we take a slight detour from our planned look at Consensus 24 to bring you a special conversation with Matt O'Neil, co-founder and partner at 50H Consulting and former Deputy Special Agent in Charge of Cyber at the @US Secret Service.Matt shares his unique insights and experiences with our host, Aidan Larkin. Together, they delve into the challenges of asset recovery and forfeiture, especially those concerning cyber-enabled fraud. They discuss why the Secret Service investigates financial crimes, the importance of leveraging emerging technologies like AI to combat sophisticated transnational cybercrime and the necessity for enhanced information-sharing practices between the public and private sectors.Timestamps00:00 - Matt's journey with the US Secret Service05:00 - Using asset seizures to fight cyber-enabled fraud09:30 - The Secret Service's role in investigating financial crime12:00 - Challenges in asset recovery and forfeiture15:00 - Operation Shamrock and enhancing cross-sector information-sharing22:30 - Reimagining regulations for technology and finance29:00 - Understanding a typical scam case31:30 - Leveraging AI to combat transnational crime35:30 - Future trends in financial crime and asset recoveryResources Mentioned:Operation ShamrockErin West and Pig Butchering on Seize & DesistAbout our Guest:Matt O'Neil has over 25 years of experience disrupting and dismantling financially motivated transnational organised criminal groups with the US Secret Service.As the former Managing Director of the USSS Global Cyber Investigative Operations Center (GIOC) and Cyber Intelligence Section (CIS), Matt was instrumental in coordinating international takedowns of digital money laundering networks and dark web marketplaces. His efforts led to the prosecution of globally notorious cybercriminals responsible for stealing and laundering billions. He also led their Asset Forfeiture Branch to successfully recover more than US$2 billion in seized assets in just 2 years. Since retiring from the Secret Service, Matt has dedicated himself to raising awareness for the threats posed by transnational organised crimes like pig butchering, ransomware and phishing.DisclaimerOur podcasts are for informational purposes only. They are not intended to provide legal, tax, financial, and/or investment advice. Listeners must consult their own advisors before making decisions on the topics discussed. Asset Reality has no responsibility or liability for any decision made or any other acts or omissions in connection with your use of this material.The views expressed by guests are their own and their appearance on the program does not imply an endorsement of them or any entity they represent. Views and opinions expressed by Asset Reality employees are those of the employees and do not necessarily reflect the views of the company. Asset Reality does not guarantee or warrant the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, suitability or validity of the information in any particular podcast and will not be responsible for any claim attributable to errors, omissions, or other inaccuracies of any part of such material. Unless stated otherwise, reference to any specific product or entity does not constitute an endorsement or recommendation by Asset Reality.
Under the 14th Amendment, "No state shall...deprive any person of...property, without due process of law." This principle was at the heart of the matter of the 2023 Supreme Court case of Culley v. Marshall, in which two women had respectively loaned their cars to others only to have the cars seized under an Alabama civil forfeiture law following each lendee's arrest for drug offenses. The petitioners claimed that, absent a preliminary hearing, their 14th Amendment rights had been violated. Justice Kavanagh wrote for the majority stating that “In civil forfeiture cases, the Due Process Clause requires a timely forfeiture hearing, but does not require a separate preliminary hearing.” In this episode, Craig is joined by Attorney Kirby Thomas West from the Institute for Justice to discuss the recent SCOTUS decision in Culley v. Marshall. Craig & Kirby spotlight civil forfeiture and the potential impact of this ruling.
Under the 14th Amendment, "No state shall...deprive any person of...property, without due process of law." This principle was at the heart of the matter of the 2023 Supreme Court case of Culley v. Marshall, in which two women had respectively loaned their cars to others only to have the cars seized under an Alabama civil forfeiture law following each lendee's arrest for drug offenses. The petitioners claimed that, absent a preliminary hearing, their 14th Amendment rights had been violated. Justice Kavanagh wrote for the majority stating that “In civil forfeiture cases, the Due Process Clause requires a timely forfeiture hearing, but does not require a separate preliminary hearing.” In this episode, Craig is joined by Attorney Kirby Thomas West from the Institute for Justice to discuss the recent SCOTUS decision in Culley v. Marshall. Craig & Kirby spotlight civil forfeiture and the potential impact of this ruling.
“The speed at which this happens is faster than anything we've seen before.”In this episode, Seize & Desist host Aidan Larkin is joined by Jarod Koopman, the Executive Director of Cyber and Forensic Services at IRS Criminal Investigations.As the only federal law enforcement agency to focus completely on fighting financial crimes, IRS Criminal Investigations has seized more digital assets than any other agency in the world. Aidan and Jarod discuss the secret to IRS-CI's status as a world leader in digital currency investigations, the reliability of blockchain analytics data in court and the lasting impact of asset seizures on criminal behaviour.Jarod shares his thoughts on the legitimacy of cryptocurrency transactions, the necessary compliance guidelines, and the parallels between Brazilian jiu-jitsu and cryptocurrency investigations.Timestamps01:00 - IRS's Expertise in Cybercrime and Asset Seizures05:30 - Unveiling the Success Behind Major Investigations07:00 - Revolutionizing Transactional Analysis with Blockchain Tools11:30 - Collaborative Innovation in Cybercrime Investigations13:30 - Evaluating FATF's Effectiveness in Asset Recovery16:00 - Balancing Privacy and Crime Prevention19:30 - Explaining Cryptocurrency Mixers and Blockchain Laundering20:00 - Legitimate Uses of Cryptocurrency Amongst the Illicit Activity25:30 - The Impact of Asset Seizure in Fighting Crime30:00 - Law Enforcement and the Evolving Digital Landscape33:00 - Fostering Resilience and Innovation36:00 - Why Martial Arts Promotes Success in the Investigative Services41:00 - Civil Forfeiture in Asset Recovery44:00 - Validating Blockchain Analytics in Legal JudgmentsResources Mentioned:Jarod on the TRM Talks PodcastSamourai Wallet Founders Arrested and Charged With Money Laundering IRS Criminal Investigations on LinkedIn About our Guest:Jarod Koopman is the Executive Director of Cyber and Forensic Services at IRS Criminal Investigations and a black belt in Brazillian Jiu-Jitsu.He joined the IRS directly after college, rising through the ranks to become the agency's first director of cybercrime. In this role, Jarod oversees all global operations involving cyber and forensic activities, including policy, procedures, budget and investigative services. He also oversees the operation of their new centralised Advanced Collaboration and Data Center (ACDC) which specialises in training and support for crypto compliance.DisclaimerOur podcasts are for informational purposes only. They are not intended to provide legal, tax, financial, and/or investment advice. Listeners must consult their own advisors before making decisions on the topics discussed. Asset Reality has no responsibility or liability for any decision made or any other acts or omissions in connection with your use of this material.The views expressed by guests are their own and their appearance on the program does not imply an endorsement of them or any entity they represent. Views and opinions expressed by Asset Reality employees are those of the employees and do not necessarily reflect the views of the company. Asset Reality does not guarantee or warrant the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, suitability or validity of the information in any particular podcast and will not be responsible for any claim attributable to errors, omissions, or other inaccuracies of any part of such material. Unless stated otherwise, reference to any specific product or entity does not constitute an endorsement or recommendation by Asset Reality.
It would have to be a future case more specifically on point. https://www.lehtoslaw.com
“Crypto exposed every crack in an undereducated, underutilised system.”In this episode, recorded on the 15th of February, Aidan and Amanda delve into the world of digital asset recovery, exploring the complexities of civil forfeiture and the use of cryptocurrency to finance terrorism.Drawing from her extensive background in policy, enforcement and legal affairs, Amanda offers valuable insights into how these experiences have shaped her perspective on cryptocurrency and the future of decentralisation.Their conversation also touches on why the significance of initiatives like the Association for Women in Cryptocurrency, as Amanda emphasizes the need to improve inclusivity and empowerment across the digital finance ecosystem.Timestamps02:00 | Amanda's background as a federal prosecutor06:30 | Civil vs criminal burden of proof09:30 | The pros and cons of non-conviction-based forfeiture18:00 | Cryptocurrency exposes the flaws in the existing asset recovery system25:00 | Crime and innovation on the path to development 31:00 | The importance of optics in targeting crypto terrorist financing41:00 | Why we need an Association for Women in Cryptocurrency43:30 | #UnmanelYourPanel and other advocacy initiatives46:00 | The importance of male allies to improve inclusion for womenResources Mentioned:WomeninCrypto.orgAssociation for Women in Cryptocurrency on LinkedInAssociation for Women in Cryptocurrency on Twitter (X)Women in Crypto Podcast: Decrypting Asset Recovery in Crypto with Joanna SummersAbout our Guest:Amanda Wick is a prominent figure in the world of cryptocurrency and digital finance with an extensive background in policy enforcement and legal affairs.Having served as the Senior Investigative Counsel for the US House of Representatives, Senior Policy Advisor for the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) and the Chief of Legal Affairs at Chainalysis, Amanda has been a driving force behind some of the key policies shaping our financial landscape. As the founder of the Association for Women in Cryptocurrency, Amanda is dedicated to fostering inclusivity and empowerment within the digital finance ecosystem, championing initiatives like ‘UnManel Your Panel' that aim to break down barriers and pave the way for a more diverse industry.DisclaimerOur podcasts are for informational purposes only. They are not intended to provide legal, tax, financial, and/or investment advice. Listeners must consult their own advisors before making decisions on the topics discussed. Asset Reality has no responsibility or liability for any decision made or any other acts or omissions in connection with your use of this material.The views expressed by guests are their own and their appearance on the program does not imply an endorsement of them or any entity they represent. Views and opinions expressed by Asset Reality employees are those of the employees and do not necessarily reflect the views of the company. Asset Reality does not guarantee or warrant the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, suitability or validity of the information in any particular podcast and will not be responsible for any claim attributable to errors, omissions, or other inaccuracies of any part of such material. Unless stated otherwise, reference to any specific product or entity does not constitute an endorsement or recommendation by Asset Reality.
The Nebraska Legislature argued over civil forfeiture, fentanyl penalties and who can be sued for child sexual abuse.
Billy Binion is an associate editor at Reason magazine, where he writes about criminal justice and government accountability. He has been published in Newsweek, the San Francisco Chronicle, HuffPost, The Saturday Evening Post, and the Washington Examiner, among other publications, and his work has been cited by The New York Times, The Atlantic, National Review, Fox News, and CNN.Billy's Writing for ReasonIf You Liked This Conversation, You'll Probably Like These Episodes of Where We Go Next:90: In Defense of an Eternally Radical Idea, with Greg Lukianoff91: Free Speech Isn't Just for People We Like, with Kat Rosenfield50: America Has Failed Its Working Poor, with Joanne Goldblum and Colleen Shaddox37: A Better Way to Police Communities, with Peter Moskos21: Defending the Rights of the Incarcerated, with Samuel WeissFollow Billy on X: @BillyBinion----------Are you a fan of Where We Go Next? Listen to the very end of this episode for details.Email: michael@wherewegonext.comInstagram: @wwgnpodcast
Their supreme court said it is something they are entitled to. https://ij.org/
The Supreme Court of Canada's recent decision pertains to the Hells Angels' appeal against the forfeiture of three of their clubhouses. This decision is significant as it validates British Columbia's efforts to combat organized crime through asset forfeiture. Guest: Kim Bolan, Crime Reporter for the Vancouver Sun Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Between 2000 and 2019, the US Federal and State Governments pocketed 68.8 billion according to the Institute for Justice. Civil forfeiture, which is different than criminal forfeiture, is encroaching on citizen's rights. We look at the details of this little-known practice nationwide. We also examine the crime surge in blue cities that is destroying communities.
Sometimes referred to as Civil Asset Forfeiture, today's episode is an examination of the legalized theft that is civil forfeiture. Joining Hunter to unpack the intricacies of this topic, is Dan Alban. In his role at the Institute for Justice, Dan is one of the people at the forefront of people pushing back against the practice that flips the concept of innocent until proven guilty on its head. As you will hear on this episode, the complex legal nature of this topic masks a process that most Americans, when exposed to it, will viciously oppose. Guests: Dan Alban, Senior Attorney at the Institute for Justice/Co-Director of the Campaign to end Forfeiture Abuse Resources: Richardson v. $20,771.00 U.S. Currency https://ij.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Initial-Brief-of-Respondents-FINAL-TO-FILE-07.15.20-IJ115663xA6322.pdf More on Richardson Case https://ij.org/report/policing-for-profit-3/pfp3content/evidence-suggests-forfeiture-doesnt-work/south-carolina-high-court-weighs-forfeiture-and-the-constitution/ Policing for Profit Report https://ij.org/report/policing-for-profit-3/ End Forfeiture Abuse https://endforfeiture.com/ Contact Hunter Parnell: Publicdefenseless@gmail.com Instagram @PublicDefenselessPodcast Twitter @PDefenselessPod www.publicdefenseless.com Subscribe to the Patron www.patreon.com/PublicDefenselessPodcast Donate on PayPal https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted_button_id=5KW7WMJWEXTAJ Donate on Stripe https://donate.stripe.com/7sI01tb2v3dwaM8cMN
#HELLSANGELS #HELLSANGELSMC #MOTORCYCLECLUBS The legal fight for the Hells Angels clubhouses doesn't appear to be over yet. Angel Acres Recreation and Festival Property, the owners of Nanaimo, Kelowna and East Vancouver clubhouses that were seized last week, filed an application in Canada's highest court on April 18 for leave to appeal a decision involving the Director of Civil Forfeiture. Whether the Supreme Court will decide to hear the case or not remains to be seen. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/motorcyclemadhouse/message
This week on Legally Speaking with Michael Mulligan:Unlike in the United States, where property rights are constitutionally protected, there is no similar protection in the Canadian Charter. Various provinces, including British Columbia, have set up civil forfeiture regimes that permit property to be seized absent any criminal conviction. Civil forfeiture can occur based on a civil standard of a balance of probabilities, rather than proof beyond a reasonable doubt. In British Columbia property can be seized if the government can prove that it's probably the “proceeds of unlawful activity” or an “instrument of unlawful activity”. In a recent decision, the BC Court of Appeal found that it was permissible for the provincial government to seize property on the basis that it would probably be used, in the future, for unlawful purposes even if there was no evidence that it had been used for unlawful purposes in the past. While seizing property on the basis that it is “likely to be used to engage in unlawful activity” in the future, on a civil standard of probably, may be constitutionally permissible, the public policy question that should be asked is whether this is fair or appropriate.When courts review legislation, they are not deciding if a law is fair or a good idea. The standard of review is whether the legislation is constitutionally permissible. Also, on the show, a case involving a sentence imposed by a judge for manslaughter, after a jury acquitted an accused of murder, but convicted of this lesser included offence is discussed. The case involved a 74-year-old man, with no criminal record, who shot a roommate who had engaged in frequent violent, threatening and unpredictable behaviour. On the evening in question the roommate had a dispute over rent and said that he would be dealing with the accused at midnight. When, at midnight, the roommate announced that the accused's time had come, and did not stop, the accused shot and killed him with a revolver. When a jury renders a verdict, the judge hearing the case needs to make findings of fact consistent with the verdict and sentence the accused accordingly. In the case discussed, the Crown asked the judge to find that the case was a “near murder” while the defence urged the judge to conclude it was “near self-defence”. The trial judge took a middle position and sentenced the then 77-year-old to 7 years in jail.The 7-year sentence was upheld on appeal. Finally, on the show, a man who was blocking a road to prevent logging was acquitted on a charge of contempt of court because the Crown didn't prove that the man had knowledge of the court order he was alleged to be in contempt of. The RCMP, who were enforcing the injunction, read only a summary of the injunction to the man before arresting him.The Crown argued that the doctrine of wilful blindness was applicable. The judge concluded that this was not applicable as there wasn't evidence to support this. Wilful blindness could apply if, for example, someone plugged their ears or closed their eyes when an injunction was read or provided to them in writing. The judge hearing the case pointed out that it's a criminal offence to obstruct a highway for the purpose of compelling another person to abstain from doing anything they have a lawful right to do, and that knowledge of the law is presumed. Because the prosecution was for contempt, rather than breaching section 423(1)(g) of the Criminal Code, the accused was found not guilty. Follow this link for links to the cases discussed.
This week the fellas talk personal Medkits, giving honest opinions or not, police stealing money from citizens, dad jokes and remembering layaway.
It's been a legal fight for seven years. A secretive IRS database detailing the size and scope of federal civil forfeiture will finally receive outside scrutiny. Kathy Sanchez, a researcher at the Institute for Justice, explains what they might find. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.
Dan Greenberg of the Competitive Enterprise Institute discusses five myths of civil forfeiture. Cash seizures are typically hundreds or thousands of dollars, not hundreds of thousands. People typically don't get their day in court and without due process. People are not convicted or even charged for wrong doing.
The UK announced new sanctions yesterday relating to the Russian invasion of Ukraine, targeting seven oligarchs with links to Vladimir Putin. Among them is Roman Abramovich, the owner of Chelsea FC.In today's video we try to answer three questions: Who owns Chelsea FC right now? What happens with the other Russian assets being seized around the world? And, what happens with Russian financial assets like stocks and bonds that westerners own that have stopped trading due to the new sanctions?Patrick's Books:Statistics For The Trading Floor: https://amzn.to/3eerLA0Derivatives For The Trading Floor: https://amzn.to/3cjsyPFCorporate Finance: https://amzn.to/3fn3rvC Patreon Page: https://www.patreon.com/PatrickBoyleOnFinanceVisit our website: www.onfinance.orgFollow Patrick on Twitter Here: https://twitter.com/PatrickEBoylePatrick Boyle On Finance YouTube Channel Support the show (https://www.patreon.com/PatrickBoyleOnFinance)
In this episode we are talking with Arif Panju, a managing attorney with the Institute for Justice, who tells us about the ordeal of his client Ameal Woods and why innocent people are having money taken from them in a practice known as civil forfeiture.
The "White Supremacy" Scapegoat, Civil Forfeiture, Unwarranted Self-Importance, Anti Anti-Israel Boycotts
Dallas police used civil forfeiture laws at Love Field to seize $106k from a woman. In Massachusetts a woman lost her car for six years over civil forfeiture laws. In Philadelphia the authorities took a man's car and over $500 because he was talking to someone they were surveilling. These are just three examples of civil forfeiture laws being used to hurt people and fund local governments. And this isn't fake. It's really happening. Dan and Producer-Wife Beth dig into this issue and raise awareness of just how scary this overreach has become.
Did you know that sometimes the government can take something from you without ever charging you with a crime? The practice is called “civil forfeiture” and in this episode, join co-hosts (and lawyers) Maclen and Ashleigh Stanley as they discuss a smelly case involving approximately 64,695 Pounds of Shark Fins. This unbelievable story will teach you about the history of civil forfeiture and the fair and unfair times it's been used in the past. About the Hosts Maclen and Ashleigh Stanley are lawyers who are both passionate about making the law accessible and fun, which they do regularly on their show, The Law Says What. (Check it out on TikTok). Maclen is the author of the book The Law Says What?: Stuff You Didn't Know About the Law (but Really Should!). Laura is a corporate attorney specializing in entertainment, sports, media, and music law. For two lawyers, they argue less than you'd think. About Honest History Honest History creates award-winning books, magazines, and this show for young historians across the world. Our mission is to inspire kids to create a positive impact on history themselves. Learn more at honesthistorymag.com and @honesthistory. Credits This episode was written by Heidi Coburn and produced by Randall Lawrence. Original theme music was written and recorded by Luke Messimer. More Enjoy this episode? Share with your friends and don't forget to rate and review. See you next time!
This week on Legally Speaking with Michael Mulligan The Provincial and Supreme Court in British Columbia recently introduced practice directives requiring lawyers to indicate the proper gender pronoun for themselves, and their clients, before each hearing. Lawyers have been directed to indicate if they, and the client, wish to be referred to as he/him/his, she/her/hers or they/them/their.This was the subject of controversy at the recent BC Law Society annual general meeting where some lawyers were calling for more debate with respect to this direction. Of interest, in the BC Supreme Court, judges are referred to as either My Lady or My Lord and the practice direction doesn't require judges to advise which they prefer. In the BC Provincial Court, all judges are referred to as Your Honour. Several years ago, some BC Supreme Court Judges attempted to adopt Your Honour but were directed to return to either My Lady or My Lord. Also on the show, the provincial government is seeking the civil forfeiture of a $3 million Vancouver penthouse that was being used as a nightclub in violation of COVID-19 rules. The owner of the penthouse is alleged to have had hundreds of unmasked people in the penthouse, on multiple occasions.The police attended the penthouse on multiple occasions and seized things including DJ equipment, a dance pole, and a $5 bill found at the base of the dance pole. Unlike in criminal cases, civil forfeiture proceedings only require proof on a balance of probabilities.If the civil forfeiture proceedings are successful, the province could take the penthouse and things seized from it by the police. Similar proceedings are also possible for businesses that are failing to abide by the requirement to check the vaccine status of customers. Legally Speaking with Michael Mulligan is live on CFAX 1070 every Thursday at 10:30 am. It's also available on Apple Podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts.Follow this link for a transcript of the show and links to the cases discussed.
Can the government seize your house, car and cash, even if you've done nothing wrong? Unfortunately, the shocking answer is yes! Steve Forbes on civil asset forfeitures, and on how this process is being grossly abused and why it should be promptly ruled unconstitutional.Steve Forbes shares his What's Ahead Spotlights each Tuesday, Thursday and Friday.
Massachusetts is the only state where police and prosecutors can confiscate - and keep indefinitely - property based merely on reasonable suspicion. It's a process called "civil forfeiture," and it's the subject of a new WBUR investigation in partnership with ProPublica.
Plus, we discuss the bill that requires testing over 6,000 backlogged rape kits in Massachusetts with its sponsor, State Representative Natalie Higgins, and take listener calls on the changing workplace and future of work with a roundtable of business experts.
Questions on Protecting Wealth with Gold & Silver? Call 877-410-1414 or Schedule a Call for Later Here: ↓ https://calendly.com/itmtrading/youtube?utm_source=YouTube __________ Eric sources questions from Lynette's viewers and Lynette responds with organic and unrehearsed answers. If you have a question for Lynette and Eric, please either submit your question though YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, or email to questions@itmtrading.com. If you enjoyed the Q&A with Lynette Zang, please like, subscribe, and share in order to help Lynette fight the fiat money disease! Have questions for the Q&A, email us at questions@itmtrading.com. Have questions about acquiring gold and silver? Call: 877-410-1414 To see Lynette's slides, research links or questions from this video: https://www.itmtrading.com/blog/gold-price-control-3-resets-hyperinflationqa-with-lynette-zang-eric-griffin/ Viewer Submitted Questions: Question 1: 0:43 Lynette often talks about "you don't hold it you don't own it" and also about 3rd party risk and hence private storage companies. However, it seems the following Youtube video titled "Class Action Against FBI For Abusive Seizure and CIVIL FORFEITURE! Viva & Barnes" suggests even private vaults have third party State Agency (FBI) risk. Is this a risk from your perspective or an aberration? Question 2: 2:36 I am fairly well qualified in technical fields such as mathematics, sciences etc. I cannot understand how inflation equates to a covert tax? Question 3: 3:58 How do you know this reset will happen? There are others who are not so sure. Question 4: 8:24 Can the Federal Government ever go bankrupt? Question 5: 8:40 Can you give an example on how junk silver or American Eagles might be used to barter during hyperinflation? How does a person go about determining the value of the product (i.e. eggs or milk) in silver if during hyperinflation the value of silver in terms of fiat is constantly changing? Follow Lynette Zang ⬇️ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/lynettezang/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/itmtrading_zang __________ Find out if you're properly protected today... ITM TRADING: Helping Build Your Future, Freedom, and Legacy Call Today for Your 1st Strategy Session: 877-410-1414 You can also email us at: Services@ITMtrading.com All Our Videos and Research: https://www.ITMTrading.com/Blog Homepage: https://www.ITMTrading.com ITM Trading Twitter: https://twitter.com/itmtrading Lynette Zang Twitter: https://twitter.com/itmtrading_zang Facebook: https://facebook.com/ITMTrading By ITM Trading's Lynette Zang Call Us Direct for Long-Term Gold & Silver Strategies: 877-410-1414 ITM Trading Inc. © Copyright, 1995 - 2021 All Rights Reserved.
This episode is also available as a blog post: http://donnyferguson.com/2017/03/13/clarence-thomas-casts-doubt-on-the-constitutionality-of-civil-forfeiture/ --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/donny-ferguson/message
New Mexico ended civil forfeiture in 2015. What's happened in policing since then? Jennifer McDonald of the Institute for Justice crunched the numbers. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.
From a seized payloader to North Dakota's poor national rating in civil asset forfeiture laws, your Straight Talk hosts Emmery Mehlhoff and Seth Estenson take up the issues surrounding civil asset forfeiture in our state and Rep. Rick Becker's idea of a three-pronged approach to reforming civil asset forfeiture in North Dakota.
Our guest this week is attorney Bob Nersesian. Bob is one our favorite guests. He is a gaming attorney and author of The Law for Gamblers.We welcome your questions - send them to us at gamblingwithanedge@gmail.com, or you can find me at @RWM21 on Twitter or https://www.facebook.com/GamblingWithAnEdge.podcastClick to listen - Alt click to downloadShow Notes[00:00] Introduction of gaming attorney and author of The Law for Gamblers, Bob Nersesian[00:37] Virgin Hotel and Casino Las Vegas[03:03] Do casinos have to read the trespass act before 86'ing someone?[06:11] Caesars and El Dorado merger effect on previous trespass warnings[11:15] Multiple people playing on the same card[15:10] Civil Forfeiture[17:55] Collecting abandoned credits[23:39] Paying Caesars attorney's fee in the event of a loss[26:30] When can casino security search a player's hotel room?[29:35] South Point Casino March promotions - $500k Swipe, Spin, and Win[30:34] Predictit.org/promo/edge - place small wagers on various political events, $20 deposit match for GWAE listeners[31:19] VideoPoker.com/gwae - Gold Membership offers correction on most games[32:45] Casino comps expired a day early[39:50] Phone usage and device law in casinos[42:19] Are casinos required to cash out expired slot tickets?[46:25] Are slot tickets the same as chips?[50:02] Are sportsbooks limits legal?[52:50] Can a sportsbook require a customer to show ID to cash a ticket?[57:21] Hache on Netflix, Last Tango in HalifaxSponsored Links:SouthPointCasino.comPredictit.org/promo/edgeVideoPoker.com/gwae Books Referenced:The Law for Gamblers by Bob Nersesian https://amzn.to/3rZiAKlWebsites Referenced:Usa.gov/unclaimed-moneyRecommended:Hache Netflix.com/title/80241387Last Tango in Halifax Netflix.com/title/70281023
There are a lot of problems for us to work out in society, but these things go unnoticed by most until it happens to them. One can lose their money in a traffic stop, or their house over a lawn that is too long. This kind of nonsense has to be addressed, and it is up to all of us to vote these clowns out, and speak up when we see others affected.
Today on WDYTAX we're joined by Jonathan Rose, Associate Professor in Politics and Research Methodology. He's guiding us through a fascinating conversation on the nature of corruption. We talk about definitions and the history of the word and some of the current research on the topic. If you'd like to check out Jonathan's work his profile is here: https://www.dmu.ac.uk/about-dmu/academic-staff/business-and-law/jonathan-rose/jonathan-rose.aspx And the Last Week Tonight episode on Civil Forfeiture can be seen on YouTube here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3kEpZWGgJks
In 2015, New Mexico abolished a controversial practice known as civil forfeiture. Critics of the reform claimed it would be a gift to criminals, increasing […] The post This Is What Happens When States Abolish Civil Forfeiture appeared first on Institute for Justice.
In 2015, New Mexico abolished a controversial practice known as civil forfeiture. Critics of the reform claimed it would be a gift to criminals, increasing crime and making it harder for police to do their jobs. In this episode, we talk about what things look like in New Mexico now, five years post-reform. We also… The post This Is What Happens When States Abolish Civil Forfeiture appeared first on Institute for Justice.
This week on Frown Town, Vee and J read the Justice for Victims of Trafficking Act of 2015 where they discover that children are anyone under 24 and that $28.5M of money ear marked for the ACA is going to law enforcement officers, prosecutors, and courts salaries. Don't worry, we have sources! Act https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/senate-bill/178 Referenced Links: Average age of sex workers: https://abolitionistmom.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Complete_CSEC_0estes-weiner.pdf Prostitution and Human Trafficking in Nine Countries: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/254381847_Prostitution_and_Trafficking_in_Nine_Countries In Thailand, sex workers are detained and forced to undergo occupational retraining: https://www.nswp.org/sites/nswp.org/files/Hit%20and%20Run%20%20RATSW%20Eng%20online.pdf VIctims of Sex Trafficking Act of 2000 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-106publ386/pdf/PLAW-106publ386.pdf John Oliver's Take on Civil Forfeiture: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3kEpZWGgJks Special thank you to FCON for loaning us their song Liquid Fury for our intro! Their bandcamp: https://fcon206.bandcamp.com/track/fcon.
We all know that the Constitution says that the government cannot deny anyone of life liberty or property without due process of law. But did you know that the government may be able to seize your property - even if you're not accused of a crime? It's true. Federal and state statutes allow authorities to take your property through a process called civil forfeiture. Many taxpayers are unclear on the laws and guidelines that support civil forfeiture. In this week’s podcast, Kelly and her guest Dan Alban, a fighting and pro-bono defense attorney for similar cases discuss the ins, outs, dos, and don’ts of civil forfeiture. Hope for Civil Forfeiture Progression and Reform Sadly, there have been many innocent victims who have experienced and are still experiencing Civil Forfeiture issues. Dan helps Kelly unfold many grey areas of Civil Forfeiture as well as tips and resources on how Taxpayers and other innocent victims can forgo their litigations or prevent future incidents. They share real life cases and how civil forfeiture has progressed, as well as the hopes and optimism for reform in the future. Listen to Kelly and Dan cover many topics on Civil Forfeiture, such as: The History of Civil Forfeiture How Civil Forfeiture has transitioned Structuring and the challenges with structuring The expenses and process behind Civil Forfeiture Litigations Pending Cases and Resolutions The unknown air traveling with money rules and laws Rules and Tips for Taxpayers IRS Seizure Laws Attorney Assistance and Legal Proceedings Violations and Due Process Hopes for progression and reforms More About Kelly Phillips Erb: Kelly is the creator and host of the new Taxgirl podcast series. Kelly is a practicing tax attorney with considerable experience and knowledge. She works with taxpayers like you every day. One of the things that she does is help folks out of tax jams, and hopefully, keep others from getting into them. Links Mentioned: Kelly’s Website – Taxgirl Steve Forbe’s – What’s Ahead Structuring and Bank Information -Fincen Clyde Hirsch Sowers Respect Act End Forfeiture Dan Alban - LinkedIn form for potential clients: https://www.ij.org/report-abuse civilforfeiture, danalban, filingtaxes, forfeiture, irs, kellyerb, kellyphillipserb, smallbusinesses, tax, taxdeadline, taxgirl, taxgirlpodcast, taxpolicy, taxseason
Philip Ingram MBE chats with Max Hobbs a Solicitor with Macfarlanes LLP and Racheal Muldoon a Barrister with the 36 Commercial Crime team about money laundering regulations using the Commerzbank London fine as a basis. This is Part 2 and examines what could be done to protect institutions from falling foul of the regulations.36 Commercial Crime is a specialist team within 36 Commercial focusing in White Collar, Fraud, Investigations, financial Crime and more. Racheal has a diverse practice encompassing Financial Crime and Regulation, White Collar Crime, Art and Cultural Heritage Law, Civil Forfeiture and Condemnation, Licensing and Regulatory. She defends Fraud and POCA matters and also assists the Serious Fraud Office with ongoing high-profile investigations. Racheal has worked directly with the Financial Conduct Authority where she was an Associate within the Criminal Prosecution Team focussing predominately on investigations. Max is an associate in the corporate crime and investigations team at Macfarlanes, which is where he trained and qualified. His team advises individuals and corporate clients across the full spectrum of white collar crime, and his particular area of expertise and interest is money laundering; as such advising clients on the quirks of the Proceeds of Crime Act or assisting companies with their anti-money laundering arrangements.Macfarlanes is a London-based law firm but the majority of its work has an international dimension. Traditionally known for corporate and private client work, in recent years the firm's litigation team has grown significantly and in late 2018 it established a new corporate crime and investigations team that has been notably active, winning The Legal 500 award for Regulatory Investigations and Corporate Crime – Team of the Year.
Philip Ingram chats with Max Hobbs a Solicitor with Macfarlanes LLP and Racheal Muldoon a Barrister with the 36 Commercial Crime team about money laundering regulations using the Commerzbank London fine as a basis. This Part 1 of a more in depth look at the detail in Part 2.36 Commercial Crime is a specialist team within 36 Commercial focusing in White Collar, Fraud, Investigations, financial Crime and more. Racheal has a diverse practice encompassing Financial Crime and Regulation, White Collar Crime, Art and Cultural Heritage Law, Civil Forfeiture and Condemnation, Licensing and Regulatory. She defends Fraud and POCA matters and also assists the Serious Fraud Office with ongoing high-profile investigations. Racheal has worked directly with the Financial Conduct Authority where she was an Associate within the Criminal Prosecution Team focussing predominately on investigations. Max is an associate in the corporate crime and investigations team at Macfarlanes, which is where he trained and qualified. His team advises individuals and corporate clients across the full spectrum of white collar crime, and his particular area of expertise and interest is money laundering; as such advising clients on the quirks of the Proceeds of Crime Act or assisting companies with their anti-money laundering arrangements.Macfarlanes is a London-based law firm but the majority of its work has an international dimension. Traditionally known for corporate and private client work, in recent years the firm's litigation team has grown significantly and in late 2018 it established a new corporate crime and investigations team that has been notably active, winning The Legal 500 award for Regulatory Investigations and Corporate Crime – Team of the Year.
hey everyone, welcome back to another episode! today we chat about Liza’s new boat, Liv’s night panics, lifeguarding, getting piercings, and answering questions from a prestige group chat. enjoy :)
Did you know law enforcement can seize your property if they suspect it’s involved in a crime? Steve Forbes on civil asset forfeiture, a procedure claimed to target the illicit proceeds of organized crime has evolved as a revenue source for a number of government entities. As congress aims pass a major police reform bill few are talking about a critical law enforcement reform that disproportionately hurts low income communities and minorities. Should Police be able to seize and keep your property even if you haven’t been committed of a crime? Steve Forbes shares his What’s Ahead Spotlights each Tuesday, Thursday and Friday.
In this episode, Dan Alban, Senior Attorney at the Institute for Justice, discusses civil forfeiture, and the complaint he and IJ recently filed in Brown v. TSA. Rebecca Brown was carrying $82,373 in cash given to her by her ailing father, in order to deposit it in a Boston bank and pay for his dental care, when the cash was confiscated by the TSA and DEA for no coherently articulated reason. IJ filed this action to help Brown recover her father's money, and filed it as a class action to help the thousands of other people who the TSA and DEA have similarly wronged. More information about the case is available here. Alban is on Twitter at @DanAlban.This episode was hosted by Brian L. Frye, Spears-Gilbert Associate Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky College of Law. Frye is on Twitter at @brianlfrye. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.
No one suffers more from civil forfeiture than people too poor to fight it. Alan Clemmons is a Republican lawmaker in South Carolina working to impose the most basic level of oversight on the process. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.
The British Columbia Director of Civil Forfeiture ordered to return $2 million in cash that was seized as part of the largest money-laundering case in BC history, due to misconduct at an ex parte hearing. The decision can be found here and the reasons on the original ex parte hearing here. "The Court must take the misconduct very seriously, because misleading statements in an ex parte hearing undermine the integrity of the process, and may even obliterate it. Misleading statements are of all the greater concern when they are made on behalf of a state actor carrying public authority and trust, whose actions have significant implications for individual rights and interests."The Court of Appeal requires a new certificate be issued by the British Columbia Minister of Environment and Minister of Natural Gas for the Trans Mountain Pipeline, even though the province cannot prevent or impede construction or operation of the pipeline.And one more example of why you shouldn't try to conduct your own trial without a lawyer, as the Court of Appeal denies an after the fact application to unseal the youth court record of a complainant.
Civil forfeiture laws allow federal, State, and local police departments to seize cash, cars, homes, and property that are suspected of being involved in criminal activity. And here is the crazy thing, the property owner doesn't have to be charged with, let alone convicted of, a crime to permanently lose this property. Alabama's civil forfeiture laws are some of the worst in the nation. In this episode, Matt Green breaks down the ins and outs of this judicial and government overreach. Plus, Matt shares some real-life cases fighting this injustice and offers some suggestions on how the State should balance the scales of justice of this controversial issue. Need A Consultation with Matt Green?Click here to schedule an appointment with Matt or call the Law Offices of Matt Green at 251-434-8500. ///////// If you haven't already, please rate and review us on the Apple Podcast App or anywhere else you get your favorite podcasts. It's an important way to help new listeners find the Channeling Atticus Podcast. Stay connected with us: twitter and Facebook This podcast is sponsored by The Law Office of Matt Green and produced by Johnny Gwin at Deep Fried Studios located in Mobile, Alabama.
To raise revenue and make up for budget shortfalls, cities, states, courts, and prosecutors levy hefty fines at nearly every stage of the criminal justice system. People leaving prison owe on average $13,607 in fines and fees. For those who are poor, these fees can be catastrophic. An inability to pay can lead to a suspended license, additional fees, and even jail. In this Explainer, we explore all the ways the poor are regressively taxed in the justice system, and what can be done to stop these practices. --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/nonseqshow/message
Aaron Freiwald, Managing Partner of Freiwald Law and host of the weekly podcast, Good Law | Bad Law, is joined by University of Pennsylvania Law Professor Louis Rulli, to discuss a landmark Supreme Court case on the issue of civil forfeiture. Imagine being pulled over and having the police take all of your money before sending you on your way. It doesn’t sound like something that would happen here in America but it does. It’s called civil forfeiture and our guest, University of Pennsylvania Law Professor Louis Rulli, joins us today to talk about it. Aaron and Professor Rulli discuss the ins and outs of civil forfeiture including a recent Supreme Court case that examined the law under the 8th and 14th Amendments. The Supreme Court case specifically looked at a case where a man, Tyson Timbs, was convicted of selling $225 worth of heroin to undercover police officers. In addition to one year of house arrest, five years of probation, and $1,200 in fees and fines, Mr. Timbs’ $42,000 Land Rover was confiscated even though it was purchased with the inheritance from his father’s life insurance policy. There are also concerns that asset forfeiture has a racial component because minorities are more often subjected to these “fines.” This is a fascinating, albeit scary, discussion with Professor Rulli about Civil Forfeiture and the role it plays in our criminal justice system. Host: Aaron FreiwaldGuest: Louis Rulli Follow Good Law | Bad Law:YouTube: Good Law | Bad LawInstagram: @GoodLawBadLawWebsite: https://www.law-podcast.com
Bibhas Vaze is a criminal defence lawyer in Vancouver. In this episode we discuss British Columbia's civil forfeiture regime and how it relates to immigration. Did you know that in British Columbia the government can seize and forfeit your car if you speed? Or that police can "seize first ask later" for property that is less than $75,000? This was a fascinating look at an area of law that receives little scrutiny.
Cannabis activist Dana Larsen talks about 4/20 and cannabis-impaired driving laws. Paul Doroshenko is also on the podcast to discuss BC's controversial civil forfeiture laws as well as discrimination and place of residency in auto insurance. Follow Kyla Lee on Twitter: twitter.com/IRPlawyer Follow Paul Doroshenko on Twitter: twitter.com/PaulDoroshenko Follow Dana Larsen on Twitter: twitter.com/DanaLarsen www.acumenlaw.ca www.vancouvercriminallaw.com
The LAVA Flow | Libertarian | Anarcho-capitalist | Voluntaryist | Agorist
The US Supreme Court has delivered a blow to civil asset forfeiture. What does this mean for you and me? What's in the News with stories on Houston bad boys update, arrested for not saying the pledge, government DNA database, another Houston bad boys update, TSA drug smugglers, and a judge ignores jury. Finally, and Ask Me Anything segment on property rights versus individual rights, best area of study for anarchists, and what motivates me. This episode is brought to you by NordVPN, the easiest, cheapest, and fastest way to get secure and private access to the internet I've ever seen, and I use it every single day. Also, brought to you by Tom Woods's Liberty Classroom, helping you to become a smarter and more informed libertarian than ever before, for just 24 cents a day. WHAT'S RUSTLING MY JIMMIES The United States Supreme Court, in a unanimous decision, actually upheld the Constitution for a change, specifically the excessive fines clause in the Eight Amendment. The decision, which united the court's conservatives and liberals, makes clear that the Eighth Amendment's prohibition against "excessive fines" applies to states and localities as well as the federal government. WHAT'S IN THE NEWS In a bad boys update, the Houston Police Department will end its use of controversial no-knock warrants in most situations, Chief Art Acevedo said during a contentious town hall meeting three weeks after a deadly Pecan Park drug raid that left two people dead and five officers injured. In government indoctrination centers news, an eleven-year-old Florida boy was arrested after refusing to recite the Pledge of Allegiance in class. In unreasonable searches news, a bill introduced in the Arizona State Senate would create the largest DNA database in the country. In another bad boys update from Houston, the Houston officer bad apple who lied about the informant that led to two people dead, Houston Police Officer Gerald Goines, had a troubling history of allegations against him. In security theater news, federal employees, including several TSA baggage screeners and security personnel, are facing 10 years to life in prison for conspiracy to possess with the intent to distribute after being indicted for using their posts to smuggle over 100 million dollars of cocaine into the U.S. from Puerto Rico. In circling the wagons news, a Baltimore County judge on Thursday overturned a jury decision that granted $38 million to the family of a 23-year-old woman who was killed by police in 2016. ASK ME ANYTHING Questions on property rights versus individual rights, best area of study for anarchists, and what motivates me.
John experiences a first! We follow up on our headphones chat and using money when you travel. Also, the first almost-$2,000.00 phone is introduced, and civil forfeiture takes a big hit!
On this episode of Court Appointed, Mike and Tommy discuss the recent ruling by the Supreme Court concerning Civil Forfeiture .... or is it ?? Does the 8th Amendment concerning excessive fines mean the same thing ?? The Court is now in Session with music, "Doctor, Lawyer, Indian Chief" by MCRB.
Episode 141 is here! This week we talk Blake loving Deadpool 2, Casey Anthony going to pose nude, Elizabeth Warren calls for reparations, Jussie Smollet is a phony, Civil Forfeiture dying in the Supreme Court, and Black History Month. Then Paul defends going vegan to starve out the animals. Enjoy!
The case of Timbs v. Indiana poses a very outcome dependent question of whether or not civil forfeiture is unfair and poorly managed, so to keep this podcast interesting, Brett and Nazim go through each argument for and against and assign a numerical value to really see what they think at the end of the day. The law was supposed to start at (05:06), but it gets side-tracked with DMV stories and truly starts at (09:18).
In this episode, host Justin Bullock, chats with Bush School students Kassie Jones, Harrison Gregg, Emma Alexander, Nick Partipilo, and Zachary Wimer about their work on civil forfeiture.
Today's deep-dive Tuesday tackles a viral oral argument before the Supreme Court in Timbs v. Indiana regarding civil forfeiture -- and a delightful question (that inspired the graphic for the show notes) about whether the state can seize your Bugatti for speeding. Oh, and we check back in on the Ann Coulter v. Berkeley lawsuit that was recently settled. What happened? Listen and find out! We begin with the Berkeley settlement, and break down exactly what the University did (and didn't) promise to do going forward. Is this a "big win" for the right wing? (Hint: no.) Then, it's time to delve deeply into Timbs v. Indiana and discuss the law of civil asset forfeiture, the doctrine of proportionality, and even the concept of incorporation. Yes, it's a crazy Civ Pro kinda day.. you won't want to miss it! Then, it's time for a BRAND NEW SEGMENT -- "Yodel Mountain Remembers!" We think you're gonna love it! Oh, and we also tackle a terrific listener question about the "apology doctrine" and the nation that made apologies famous -- Canada (of course). After all that, it's time for the answer to Thomas Takes The Bar Exam #104 regarding government action and the warrant requirement of the Fifth Amendment. As always, remember to follow our Twitter feed (@Openargs) and like our Facebook Page so that you too can play along with #TTTBE! Appearances None! If you'd like to have either of us as a guest on your show, drop us an email at openarguments@gmail.com. Show Notes & Links Click here to read the Berkeley settlement. This is a link to the oral argument in Timbs v. Indiana. Finally, you can check out Maryland's "apology law," Maryland Code, Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article, § 10-920(b), by clicking here. This is the delightfully demented Corsi lawsuit against Mueller, Support us on Patreon at: patreon.com/law Follow us on Twitter: @Openargs Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/openargs/ Don't forget the OA Facebook Community! For show-related questions, check out the Opening Arguments Wiki And email us at openarguments@gmail.com
John Longworth chair of Leave Means Leave talks Brexit. Bryor Snefjella of McMaster University on Canadian Tweets. Wade McEntire of Utah Lions Eye Bank discusses cornea transplants. Beth Colgan of UCLA on civil forfeiture. Matthew Wallenstein of Colorado State University reveals the benefits of milk byproducts on agriculture. Kirsten Hawkes of Parent Previews reviews The Grinch and other Christmas films.
Topics included: Civil Forfeiture, Public Interest Law, Economic Liberty, History of Constitutional interpretation, New Supreme Court AppointmentsLarry Salzman is a Senior Attorney litigating cases involving property rights and economic liberty. He is also an adjunct clinical professor at Chapman University’s Fowler School of Law, in Orange County, Calif., where PLF’s Liberty Clinic project sponsors a trial litigation program for students. He was previously an attorney at the Institute for Justice and a judicial clerk at the U.S. Court of Federal Claims. In addition to his career in law, Larry co-founded an e-commerce company and served for four years as its CEO.More on Larry can be found at https://pacificlegal.org/staff/larry-salzman/.Like what you hear? Become a Patreon member, get exclusive content and support the creation of more videos like this! Or support the show direct through PayPal: paypal.me/YaronBrookShow.Want more? Tune in to the Yaron Brook Show on YouTube. Connect with Yaron via Tweet @YaronBrook or follow him on Facebook @ybrook and YouTube (/YaronBrook).Want to learn more about Objectivism? Check out the Ayn Rand Institute.
A new podcast from Libertarianism.org digs into the twin issues of civil forfeiture and eminent domain. Tess Terrible is the host and producer of the show. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.
Attorney Lee McGrath joins Justice and Drew in-studio to discuss civil forfeiture. Later, they discuss California painting their roads white, the dumpster fire that is MNLARS, and more.
When Congress passed that big spending plan, an anticipated reform to civil forfeiture had been curiously abandoned. Darpana Sheth of the Institute for Justice comments. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.
"nor excessive fines imposed..." - 8th Amendment So what happens when a young man sells four grams of heroin to an undercover cop? Obviously, he gets busted, does a year on house arrest, and pays a fine. Then he decided to get his life back together and heads out to find a new job. But... The cops weren't done. They used civil forfeiture laws to seize his car, valued at $40,000. Don't read too much into that value, there is a valid reason that he had the money to buy it in the first place. He sued, and the lower State Court held that he should get his car back. After all, it was only 4 ounces of heroin, and he had paid the fine the Court had imposed... The Law Enforcement agencies appealed it to the State Supreme Court...
The Attorney General has expanded the abuse of due process known as civil forfeiture. Clark Neily explains how the process harms low income and disenfranchised people. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.
Hey guys, it’s me, Brent! I don’t usually write these things, but Travis is at San Diego Comic Con this week, so it’s up to me to tell you what’s going on in this episode. And WHAT AN EPISODE IT IS! We have Beyond the Headlines with Brent and Travis, but then we’re joined by Gizmodo Science Editor Maddie Stone to catch up on trending science stories from the past few weeks. And we also have Rachel Stine returning to fill us in on some trending political stories in a rare Travis-less Politics Roundup! INTRO 0:28 Bevs Like These McElroy bros on @midnight Headline of the Week “Dæ-lek” vs. “Dah-lek” BEYOND THE HEADLINES 6:52 Ann Coulter’s Bad Flight Way Too many Contact Lenses Found In One Eye Is R Kelly Running A Sex Cult? Doctor Who’s New Doctor SCIENCE CORNER W/MADDIE STONE 48:43 Snortable Chocolate Larsen C Iceberg Breaks Off NASA’s Juno Spacecraft Reaches Jupiter NY Magazine’s Scary Climate Change Article Tips & Tricks For Reading Science Journalism POLITICS ROUNDUP W/RACHEL STINE 1:27:40 WI-FIVE 1:53:53 OUTRO 1:55:44
On this episode of Court Appointed, Mike and Tommy cover the Civil Forfeiture. You know, where they take your stuff, even if no crime is involved ? Say What ??? You've got to be kidding !!! We are not, so come and wander into Court and find out when a Safe is not a Safe. The Court is now in Session with music, "Doctor, Lawyer, Indian Chief" by MCRB.
This week we discuss Civil Forfeiture, War on Science, and Sep. of Church & State.
Jason Pye is the Director of Messaging and the Director of Justice Reform at FreedomWorks. We will be discussing the state's abusiveness in civil asset forfeiture, or better known as the state's silent crime against its citizens for the enrichment of the well connected. Before joining FreedomWorks, Jason served as editor of United Liberty, a blog dedicated to promoting free markets, individual liberty, and limited government. Please join us by calling in with your questions, or comments, 646-652-4620. Look forward to hearing from you.
Renaissance Revolution We help You to become a Renaissance Man/ Woman and take back Every area of your life and Ditch the Middle Men! Making Common Sense common once again.... Opendoorslimited.org, Book signing, I met Joseph Smith!, fighting in Texas, Internment, Homeless in my yard, Open Hearts & Minds as important as Open Doors.... National call to end Civil Forfeiture, Shell No...
More and more Canadians are being victimized by laws that allow authorities to seize assets that are suspected of being the proceeds of crime. In several provinces, property and other assets can be seized even without formal charges being laid, let alone a conviction in the case. Authorities only have to prove, based on a balance of probabilities, that property was acquired by illegal means or was used to help commit a crime. Such laws were originally created to help fight organized crime, but many now argue that the net is far too wide. An example is the story of Chad Squire who was stopped by the RCMP near Brooks Alberta in 2010. Police seized $27,000 from him, claiming that it must have been acquired illegally. In fact it was money he received from selling his house, but it took two years and an expensive court fight before it was returned. 74 year old Elizabeth Thomson of Calgary, watched as Alberta Justice obtained an order against her condo, accusing her son of using the property for criminal purposes. Later, it was revealed that the son had used her address on business documents without her knowledge. Such cases show that all law-abiding Canadians should receive the same protection against search and seizure which is found in the Criminal Code and the Charter of Rights. I’m Roger Currie. Join us again next week for more thoughts on the Frontier. For more on property rights, visit our website www.fcpp.org.
Tune into this episode to hear why Mac prefers a nomadic lifestyle, and why he couldn’t care less about hockey. Later, Max Rivlin-Nadler, writer for Gothamist, explains civil forfeiture, and how it is affecting NYC citizens.