Podcasts about Naah

Como era bom ser criança! Sem cobranças, sem boletos para pagar apenas a obrigação de ser criança! Rebel Bia, Melina e Naah contam suas histórias de quando eram crianças Dá o play e confere! ---------------------------------------------------------------- Entre no nosso grupo de Wattsapp ⁠https://chat.whatsapp.com/KlJYOnAYSmlHyVYFfMFBcG⁠ É só entrar e bater um papo com a gente do Em Cólicas, a galera do Press Start, do Geek Wars, todos estão no grupo! Então acesse o link e faça parte do nosso grupo! ----------------------------------------------------------------

In this episode of Connecting the Dots, I dive into how U.S. foreign policy impacts major conflicts in Ukraine, China, and the Middle East. Rather than simply telling you what to think, my goal is to provide context and analysis so you can form your own conclusions about these complex issues. We'll look at the roots of the Ukraine conflict, the Nord Stream pipeline sabotage, and how these events ripple across Europe. I also examine U.S. military aid to Israel and its implications for the Gaza conflict, touching on questions of international law and diplomacy. Additionally, I explore the effects of significant events, like the deaths of Hassan Nasrallah and Qasem Soleimani, and what they mean for long-term stability in the region. Join me as I connect the dots and invite you to critically assess how U.S. policy shapes the global landscape today.   Find me and the show on social media. Click the following links or search @DrWilmerLeon on X/Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, Patreon and YouTube!   Hey everyone, Dr. Wilmer here! If you've been enjoying my deep dives into the real stories behind the headlines and appreciate the balanced perspective I bring, I'd love your support on my Patreon channel. Your contribution helps me keep "Connecting the Dots" alive, revealing the truth behind the news. Join our community, and together, let's keep uncovering the hidden truths and making sense of the world. Thank you for being a part of this journey!   Wilmer Leon (00:01): Hey folks. Look, when you understand what's happening in Ukraine, when you understand what's happening in China as it relates to the United States trying to start a war with China over Taiwan, when you look at the latest developments the Middle East, you have to ask yourself this. And has President Biden become a victim of his own rhetoric? Has he fallen into his own trap? Let's talk about this, Announcer (00:41): Connecting the dots with Dr. Wilmer Leon, where the analysis of politics, culture, and history converge. Wilmer Leon (00:49): Welcome to the Connecting the Dots podcast with Dr. Wilmer Leon and I am Wilmer Leon. Here's the point. We have a tendency to view current events as though they happen in a vacuum, failing to understand the broader historic context in which they take place. So today, looking at Ukraine, looking at China, looking what's happening in the Middle East, I decided that I would just take a few minutes and just give you some extemporaneous just off the top of the head kind of stuff. No guests on this segment. Y'all are just stuck with me. So let's start here. In his last address to the United Nations as President Joe Biden said, I recognize the challenges from Ukraine and Gaza to Sudan and beyond. War, hunger, terrorism brutality, record displacement of people, a climate crisis, democracy at risk, strains within our societies, the promise of artificial intelligence and its significant risks. The list goes on. (02:00): Well, when you start to unpack that knapsack, when you really pay attention to the list of things, the litany of conflicts and tensions that Joe Biden just articulated, you have to ask yourself this. He mentions Ukraine, who started the conflict in Ukraine? Why did it start? Well, it started in 2014, during the Obama administration went with what was known as the Maidan Coup. The United States went in. In 2014, Victoria Newland led the effort overthrew the democratically elected government of Victor Jankovich, and installed a Nazi based Ukrainian nationalist government led by the current President, Volodymyr Zelensky. It escalated during the Biden administration and it has become a full-blown military conflict that President Biden refuses to settle. In fact, one of the most recent speeches given by Vice President Harris talking about the Ukraine, she said, the Russian proposal is not a peace deal. It is not a settlement. (03:30): She said, it is a surrender. Well, if you look at the data, it is a surrender because the Ukraine has lost, they hardly have any artillery shells left. Just about all of their tanks have been blown to smithereens. The F-16's that they've just received, some of them were blown up before they even made it off the runway. And you have US generals saying that the F sixteens that the United States and NATO sent are no match for the Russian Air Force. Their army is totally depleted. They've had to go to their prisons, empty their prisons, and send prisoners to the front. They have what are called press gangs that are scouring the Ukrainian countryside kidnapping men of age, sending them to the front. (04:35): It's over, it's over. The fat lady just ain't sung yet. That's really what you're looking at in Ukraine. It's over, but they just haven't blown the whistle. So yeah, it's going to be a surrender. You might as well, you might as well fire up the USS Missouri resurrect Emperor Hirohito from World War II and have Ukraine surrender the same way Japan had to because that's the way this has gone. September 26th, 2022, a series of underwater explosions and consequent gas leaks occurred on three or four pipelines of the Nord Stream pipeline in the Baltic Sea. This occurred during and based upon the Sy Hersh reporting tells us that this was conducted during the Biden administration. The Biden administration blew up three of the four pipelines of the Nord Stream pipeline, which provided natural gas from Russia to Germany and Germany was the distribution point for low cost natural gas throughout Europe. (05:59): And since 2022, what has happened to the economy of Germany and what has happened to other economies of European countries? They've been decimated because they now are forced to buy natural gas from the United States because the United States blew up their pipeline cutting off their access to Russian natural gas. Why? Because if you remember, when the Ukraine conflict started, president Biden told us what we're going to turn the rubble into rubble. Y'all remember that We're going to turn the ruble into rubble. Has that happened? Not at all. In fact, the rubble, the rubble, the ruble, which is the currency in Russia, is now one of the most stable currencies in the world. The Russian economy is in the top five economies in the world. Why? Because the United States was not able to bring about regime change in Russia through the Ukraine conflict. The United States was not able through its sanctions regime to bring about crippling sanctions on the Russian economy. (07:18): They have been able to find workarounds, and they have been able to continue to engage in international business all around the world. Look at the BRIC's meeting that's about to take place in Russia. You've got China. Well, the BRIC's, the acronym for what? For Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa. And now you have a number of other countries that are joining this economic cooperative, and they are finding workarounds around the sanctions that the United States is imposing on all of these countries. In terms of Gaza, who's funding the genocide in Gaza, the Biden administration, of course, president Biden in May of 2024 said, he said what he would halt some of the shipments of American weapons to Israel, which he acknowledged had been used to kill civilians in Gaza. If Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu ordered a major invasion in the city of Rafa, well, Netanyahu did it. Biden did not honor his word. He still sent those weapons to Israel. And what do we find now? (08:47): $8.7 billion on their way of weapons and military aid are now on their way to Israel. Citizens have been killed in Gaza as a consequence of the bombs and other ways in which they go after population centers. Biden said this on CNN to Aaron Burnett back in May of 2024, civilians have been killed in Gaza as a consequence of those bombs and other ways in which they Israel go after population centers. He said that to CNN, and he still sends weapons to Gaza. He said, I made it clear that if they go into Rafa, and they haven't gone into Rafa yet, if they go into Rafa, this was May of 2024. I'm not supplying the weapons. They've been used historically to deal with Rafa to deal with the cities that deal with that problem. Where are we now? Four months later, Israel said in September, it had secured an $8.7 billion aid package from the United States to support its ongoing military efforts and to maintain a qualitative military edge in the region. (10:20): Folks for the United States to send military weapons into Israel violates international law. It violates American law. It violates the Arms Export Control Act. It violates American law for the United States government to send weapons to countries that are in the midst of oppressing their own people. Look up the arms. Export Control Act. $8.7 billion of your hard earned tax dollars are being sent to Israel to support genocide. This package includes three and a half billion dollars for essential wartime procurement, what they call essential wartime procurement, which has already been received and earmarked for critical military purchases. What does that mean? Well, in common parlance, we'd call that a money laundering scheme. So the United States sends $8.7 billion or earmarks or tags or identifies $8.7 billion for Israel for military weaponry. And what then happens? Well, that money goes to Lockheed Martin, that money goes to Boeing, that money goes to Raytheon. (11:52): That money goes to what Dwight Eisenhower told us in his 1959 farewell address to the American people, the military industrial complex. So the United States Funds genocide is backing the extermination, the elimination, the removal of innocent Palestinian people while American arms manufacturers make billions and billions of dollars. Oh, and by the bye, president Biden also said he's sending another $8 billion to Ukraine. So that's 8 billion to Ukraine. That's 8.7 to Israel. That's $16.7 billion, and they're sending almost 600 million to Taiwan. That's $17 billion in just one month that the United States is sending for militarism and the United States isn't being attacked. We're not under threat. (13:17): 8 billion to Ukraine. Ukraine is the proxy of the United States. The Ukraine is the proxy of NATO. Volodymyr Zelinsky, the president of Ukraine, he tried to negotiate a settlement with Vladimir Putin in April of 2022, right after two months after the damn thing started. And right as they were reaching an agreement, the United States had the former British Prime Minister, Boris Johnson, go to Ukraine and tell Zelensky, under no circumstances is the West going to accept a peace deal with Russia. Go figure. And now Kamala Harris says, oh, we won't tolerate this proposed peace plan because the peace plan is surrender. You had the opportunity in 2022 to bring a peaceful resolution to the conflict that you started, but you ignored it. You ignored it. Your hubris got in the way. Your ego got in the way. You were blinded by your ego to the realities that were right before you on the ground, and you ignored the opportunity. And now what has Russia done? They just keep saying, y'all want to drag this out? We'll keep fighting. When we keep fighting, we keep taking territory, and when we take territory, we don't give it back. (15:08): So yeah, it's going to be surrender. It's going to be surrender. The question simply becomes, how much of an ass whooping do you want to take? So now back to the Middle East. According to Middle East Eye on September 27th, Israeli fighters, they carried out a series of massive airstrikes on Beirut southern suburbs in what appeared to be the most intense bombardment of the Lebanese capitol. Since the 2006 war, at least 10 explosions rocked the capitol's southern suburbs, a densely populated area, colloquially known as Dahiyeh, with large clouds of blacksmith rising over the city. The result of that attack, Hezbollah leader, Hassan Nala, was assassinated. (16:08): Hassan Nasrallah, the leader of Hezbollah, was assassinated by the way, in violation of international law. Aaron Mate wrote one week after Israel began its US back campaign in a rampage in Gaza last October, Biden was asked by CBS news if fueling a Middle East conflict on top of the proxy war in Ukraine was more than the United States could take on at the same time. Basically, Hey, you're fighting wars on multiple fronts, and anybody that understands military history will tell you the more fronts you open up. This is my commentary, not mate, the more fronts you open up, the bigger problems you're going to have. What was Biden's answer to that question about is the United States taking on more than it can manage at the same time? No, Biden said, and he was incredibly indignant when he said it, we're the United States of America, for God's sake, the most powerful nation in the history, not in the world, in the history of the world. Not only does the US have the capacity to do this, Biden said, we have an obligation. We are the essential nation. And if we don't, who does? (17:38): Joe, you're reading your own press clippings, Joe, you're caught up in your own rhetoric, Joe. You've fallen victim of your own trap. It had overlooked comment. Biden gave his blessing not only to an Israel scorched earth campaign in Gaza, but Lebanon as well for Israel. Biden said, going in and taking out the extremists in Hezbollah up north along with Hamas down south is a necessary requirement. But what you got to understand, when you look at Hamas in the South, when you look at Hezbollah in the North, when you look at Ansar, Allah in Yemen, when you look at Iran, these are the forces of resistance. (18:43): They are resisting the occupation of historic Palestine. This isn't anti-Semitic rhetoric, it's fact. There's a reason why that area is referred to as the occupied territories. They don't use that language a lot in today's parlance because the West has now clearly come to understand that that narrative, that language contradicts the narrative that they're trying to present. But there's a reason why in the international criminal court, in the international Court of justice, in all kind of parliaments, in all kind of countries all over the world, they're referred to as the occupied territories. Who is the occupier? The Zionist government of Israel? Who is the occupied the Palestinians international law tells us? So when Vice President Harris steps to the podium at the DNC convention and says, Israel has the right to defend itself, nay, that's not true. When Joe Biden steps to the podium and says, at the un, Israel has the right to defend itself. That's not true. When Netanyahu steps to the podium and says, Israel has the right to defend itself, that's not true because international law is very clear. The UN is very clear. (20:53): The occupier, in this case, the Zionist government of Israel, does not have the right to defend itself against the interaction or the response by the occupied. In this instance, the Palestinians international law is, here's a very simple analogy. I can't walk into your house armed or unarmed, but I can't walk into your house armed, threaten you and your family, have you resist my aggression? And then I claim self-defense. I can't do it. It won't pass the laugh test. It won't pass the giggle test. It won't pass the smell test. I can't do that. I cannot walk into your home, take over your home, have you resist my aggression, shoot you in the process, and then claim I was defending myself. It's the same thing that's going on right now in the occupied territories. (22:25): So this isn't me being pouring haterade on Vice President Harris or Joe Biden. No, this is just the facts. So getting back to the recent assassination of Hassan Nasrallah, the IDF, the Israeli Defense Forces, they reportedly used 2000 pound bunker busting bombs supplied by the United States in the attack that in the assassination of Hassan Raah, they leveled several apartment buildings. They killed dozens of people. I mean scores with others still being believed, trapped in a rubble, which means you're going to have, they leveled a whole damn neighborhood. They leveled a neighborhood to kill one guy. (23:27): And here is an incredibly interesting revelation to all of this. The Lebanese foreign minister now says that Hassanah Raah agreed to a ceasefire, a 21 day ceasefire right before the IDF assassinated him. Abdullah Habib, the Lebanese foreign minister says, Naah agreed to the US and French proposal for a 21 day ceasefire. He said that to on CNN to Christian Yama aur. They told us that Mr. Netanyahu agreed to this. And so we also got the agreement of Hezbollah on that. And you know what happened after that? They assassinated the man. So let's trace this back. If the reporting is true, and I believe that it is Hezbollah leader, Hassan Nasrallah was ready to accept the proposed ceasefire, which by the way, the US via Vice President Kamala Harris and a number of others, president Biden claim that they're desperately working on a ceasefire. You've heard him say this, we are desperately working on a ceasefire. We are desperately working on a ceasefire. We're doing everything in our power to come up with a ceasefire. So the US and France propose to Hezbollah a 21 day ceasefire. (25:38): Nasra says, okay, not only will there be a ceasefire in Lebanon, as in between Lebanon and the Zionist colony of it, settler colony of Israel, that ceasefire also has to apply to Gaza as well. There will be a cessation of violence across the landscape because after all, why is Hezbollah fighting the IDF in defense of Hamas, in defense of the Palestinians? Why is Ansara Allah in Yemen sending missiles into Tel Aviv and other parts of Israel? Why is Ansara Allah, why have they shut down the Red Sea and not allowing Israeli flagged or ships that are delivering goods or receiving goods from Israel from the Zionist colony to transit the Red Sea in support of the Palestinians? So you can't have a ceasefire with Lebanon and not with Palestine. That wouldn't make any sense. (27:07): So the story is Hassan Nasrallah was told Netanyahu has agreed the United States and France, everybody's in sync. We can now work towards the ceasefire 21 day ceasefire. And what happens? They assassinate it. And this is what Netanyahu said at the un, his words last week, knowing he said this, knowing that they were going to assassinate the man to speak for my country to speak for the truth. And here's the truth. Israel seeks peace. Israel yearns for peace. Israel has made peace and will make peace again. Yet we face savage enemies who seek our annihilation, and we must defend ourselves against them. (28:17): That's what he said last week at the un. Israel seeks peace. Israel yearns for peace. If that is true, then why did you assassinate the guy you were negotiating with for peace after you had received the message that he agreed to your proposal? Yet we face savage enemies. So you are negotiating for a peace deal. You're on the verge of accomplishing a ceasefire, which can then get you to a peace deal, and you assassinate the guy you're negotiating with, who's the savage Bebe, you or them, and you claim that these savages seek your annihilation. Oh, show me evidence where they have been the aggressor. And please don't give me this noxious BS about October 7th because this conflict did not start on the 7th of October of 2023. That's just revisionist history. This conflict started damn near 80 years ago. October 7th was just the latest iteration of the Palestinians saying enough. October 7th was just the latest iteration of the Palestinians defending themselves. (30:22): And I go back to international law. The oppressed have the right to resist oppression and the oppressor through any means at their disposal. So please, Kamala Harris, don't tell me that this started October 7th. Please, governor Waltz, don't say at the vice presidential debate that this started on October 7th. Spare me of that bs. Spare me of that revisionist history because you're lying. And I say you're lying because you're wrong. You know you're wrong, and you are intentionally perpetrating a lie. So I ask Netanyahu again, who, by the way, his real name, his family name, his grandfather's name before his grandfather immigrated from Poland to Palestine was Milikowsky His family name is not Netanyahu. The family name is Milikowski. (31:40): They're Polish. They're European. They're not Arab. Remember, Jesus was a Palestinian Jew with skin of burnt bronze and hair of lambs wool, kind of like this. They weren't Polish, they weren't French, they weren't Russian. They're Palestinian. That's why it's called the occupied territory. Again, I digress. Nasrallah was ready to accept the proposed ceasefire and the US and Israel assassinated him. Go back to this past July. Hamas' top political leader, Ishmael Heah, was assassinated in Tehran. He was attending the installation of the Iranian president who was Ishmael Haniyeh. He was not a terrorist. He was not a military leader. He was the head of the political wing of Hamas. Understand Hamas has basically two factions. They have a military faction and they have a political faction. They started as a political group, but only when they were compelled to develop a military response to the genocide and oppression that the Zionist government of Israel was imposing upon them in the West Bank. And in that concentration camp called Gaza, did they develop a military response. But Ishmael was not part of the, he was a negotiator. (33:43): He was in the process of negotiating a ceasefire slash peace deal with Israel and the United States. And what did they do? Assassinated him. They assassinated the man. But Netanyahu stands before the world at the United Nations and says, he's speaking for truth. Israel seeks peace. Israel yearns for peace. That's what he said. Who's the savage? Joe Biden, who's the savage? BB Netanyahu. BB Milowski. Nasrallah was ready to accept a ceasefire. You assassinated him. Haniyeh was negotiating a ceasefire. You assassinated him. Let's switch gears. January 3rd, 2020. Remember General Soleimani, Qassem Soleimani, the Iranian major general who was assassinated by an American drone strike near Baghdad international airport in Iraq. Donald Trump pushed the button on Soleimani. (35:14): Why was Qassem Soleimani in Iraq? He had been lured there under the false pretense of a peace negotiation. The Saudis trying to make peace with the Iranians. You've got Sunni Muslims in Saudi Arabia. You've got Shia Muslims in Iran trying to find peace between the two. He General Soleimani was brought to Iraq under the pretext of bringing letters of negotiation between the two governments. False pretense. It was a lie. He was there on a peace mission and was assassinated. I'm connecting some dots here, folks. Are you starting to see the picture? I'm connecting some dots here, folks. Are you starting to see the picture? (36:39): Why is this going on? Oh, by the way, so Soleimani goes to Iraq. They assassinate him under the pretense of a peace deal. China steps in. And what does China do? China brokers a peace deal between who? The Saudis and Iran. So months later, the deal does get done. Even though Soleimani was assassinated, Donald Trump pushed the button on him at the behest of the Zionist government of Israel. But Netanyahu Millikowski wants to stand before you stand before the world and say, Israel yearns for peace, but these savages seek our annihilation. I ask again, Bebe, who's the savage? Joe Biden, who's the savage? Y'all tell me. (37:55): So what do we have? Well, at least in terms of the Middle East, we have Iran responds to the assassination of Haniyeh and a number of other incursions aggressions that they have been incredibly measured and incredibly calculating. And so they send some missiles into Israel, but they were very, very careful. They selected military targets, and most of the military targets that they selected were the targets that were either a, well, primarily, I won't even go to a, and let me just say they were responsible for the assassination of keeping these names in my head is a bit challenging of Hassan Nasrallah. So they decimated some F-35's at an Air Force base in near Tel Aviv. (39:23): They didn't strike any civilian centers, even though Israel has strategically placed a lot of its military, its intelligence operations and whatnot in densely populated civilian spaces. See, they're not like Israel. Israel blows up a whole damn neighborhood with 2000 pound bunker busting bombs. Israel didn't do that. They could have done that. They didn't. And they were very clear in explaining why, because they said, we aren't going to attack civilians. Also, the Holy Quran guides them in their tactics for war. They are guided as Muslims. They are guided by the Quran in terms of what is allowable in war and what is not. That is why, for example, they haven't developed a nuclear program because in their mind, by their belief, too many innocent people will be affected by the action. And when they get into a it kind of eye for an eye kind of deal, when they get into a conflict, they deal with those involved in the conflict. They don't have this idea of collateral damage. They don't sit back and calculate, well, our enemy is here, our target is here, and there are so many civilians in on the periphery, and we have an acceptable number of those that we can exterminate and still call it fair. They don't operate like that. (41:22): Their guide, the Holy Quran dictates how conflict will be managed. So that's why, for example, they sent a message to Iran and said, we are about to strike. They let 'em know they didn't have to do that. They let 'em know. See, people are making a huge mistake by confusing restraint with fear, whether it's Russia, whether it's China, whether it is Iran, because they have been so measured in their responses. They haven't just gone all out blast because that's not their tactic, that's not their way. They have a different understanding of time and what Dr. King called the moral arc of history, because their cultures are thousands of years old, unlike the United States. That's the new kid on the block. (42:30): So they have a totally different concept of time. So the adage, you have the watches, but we have the time. So they're not going to be baited into a knee jerk reaction to an attack. They're going to sit back, step back, evaluate the landscape, and then they retaliate on their terms, on their timeline through their methods. And that's why, for example, when I think it was when Hania was assassinated, the United States went to Iran and said, don't retaliate, don't respond. And Iran told Joe Biden, no, no, no, no, no, no, Joe, we got to respond to this. But understand, here's what we will do. And this is what they said. Here's what we will do. We will strike military targets. We won't strike civilian targets. And the military targets that we select will be those targets that we're responsible for engaging and planning the action that we are responding to. And here's the key that you all need to understand. They also said, Joe, once we respond, we will consider the matter settled. (44:04): Once we respond, once we retaliate, we will consider the matter settled unless you or them engage in further action. If you do that, then we are going to have to handle that business. We're going to have to do what we got to do. So they are, and I'm I'm speaking about the resistance in general. They are incredibly measured because not only do they have tactics, they have strategy. See what you see playing out from the Israeli side. There's no strategy here. There's no strategy, there's no plan. There's no long-term methodological. I think that's proper pronunciation plan. (45:08): They're just out there shooting first and asking questions later. They have tactics, but no strategy. So that takes you to the adage, if you don't know where you're going, any road will get you there. I mean, they know Annihilation, they know genocide is what they're after. But in terms of a planned, calculated strategy doesn't exist. That's why it's so hard for people to make sense out of what's happening. People keep going, what the hell are they doing? Why are they doing this? You don't know. They don't know. You don't know. They don't know. So look, that's kind of where we are now. (46:11): Israel is talking about, oh, the response is going to be horrific. Oh, the response is we are going to have a ground invasion into Lebanon. Well, they tried that and they're getting their butts kicked. They got their butts kicked. Israel got their butts kicked the last time they tried it in 2006. Israel tried to go into Lebanon in 2006, got their asses handed to 'em, and Hezbollah has only gotten stronger and smarter and even more determined if that is possible. I remember when George W. was getting ready to go into Iraq and Minister Farrakhan, and I guess I'll end with this. And Minister Farrakhan was trying to convince America that this was going to be a fool's errand. In fact, he called it the precipitant of greater tragedies to come. And one thing that he said to George W. in an open speech and letter, he said, you can't win this with your technology. (47:45): He said, the first week you got this, he says, your technology and your missiles. He said, the first week you got it, he said, but eventually you're going to have to bring your soldiers in here. And when you do that, they got something for you. He said, because you've never fought a soldier with the heart of a Muslim. He said, you're fighting God in a man. And so when you look at what the resistance is all about, when you look at what Hamas is all about, when you look at what Hezbollah is all about, when you look at what Ansar Allah is all about, do you know what anah means? (48:45): Servants of God. Would did Minister Farrakhan say you're fighting God in a man? That's not rhetoric. That's not rhetoric. My very rough limited understanding Ansar Allah means, and these are the folks in Yemen. You all know him as the Houthis servants of God. And where did that come from? When the prophet Muhammad may peace be upon him was in that region in what is now Yemen. There were a group of people that assisted him and protected him during his travels in, what were they called? Ansar Allah. So they have a history, long history of being anah servants of God. So when you have a people that have taken on that identity, this is who we are, this is what we do, you put them up against a group of 18, 19, 20-year-old Israelis that have been conscripted into military service because they are obligated by law to serve three or four years in the military. And so really all they're trying to do is get the hell out of town alive so that they can check that mark off of the list and say, okay, I did what I was supposed to do. I served my country. You put them kids up against these folks. (50:42): Sad day in Mudville, boys and girls. So I can tell you, when Casey came to bat, it was a sad day in Mudville. So hey folks, look, I thank you all for listening to my rant. Take some time, research what I've said, because what you'll find, I'm telling you all the truth. Thank you all for listening to the Connecting the Dots podcast with me, Dr. Wilmer Leon. Stay tuned for new episodes every week. Please follow and subscribe, leave a review, share the show, follow me on social media. You can find all the links below in the show description. And remember, this is where the analysis of politics, culture, and history converge because talk without analysis is just chatter, and we don't chatter here on connecting the dots. I'll tell you this. I ain't joking. I ain't playing. I'm just saying, Hey, see you allall again next time. Until then, I'm Dr. Woman Leon. Have a great one. Peace. I'm out Announcer (51:53): Connecting the dots with Dr. Wilmer Leon, where the analysis of politics, culture, and history converge.  

Welcome back to The Round 12 MOTIVATIONAL MASTERY Podcast Show! Episode #133 “STAY THE COURSE!” Episode Number 133 is entitled Stay the Course. Now guess what, I need to hear that too. This week's episode was posted later than usual after a busy day, busy week, active Saturday and a pending calendar still full tomorrow. But you know what, I took my own advice and stayed true to what I set out to do. Naah, maybe my little podcast isn't changing the world, but it sure is changing me! It's changing me into my truest self. The one who has analyzed and learned to understand who he is and how he is made up, and where his drive and determination comes from, and what matters to him most. We're all just plugging along anyway, so it's pretty-strong when we can absolutely “Hold Fast and Stay True!” BE SURE TO CLICK THE ATTACHED LINK TO SEE OUR DETAILED INFORMATIONAL EMAIL OR TO SUBSCRIBE: https://conta.cc/3XJ58fU Intro & Outro Music Provided by... Soul II Soul, Song: "Keep on Movin'!" Contributing perspective: Federick Brooks. Stay The Course, An Affirmation of Determination and Consistency.

Halloo mikersss!! Kebanyakan dari kita pasti masih bingung nih dan gak tau apa aja kegiatan ekstrakurikuler dan pengembangan diri, apalagi tentang kegiatan apasih yang harus kita lakuin buat pengembangan diri kita? Naah di episode kali ini kita bakal ngebahas tentang kegiatan ekstrakurikuler dan pengembangan diri bareng kak Wilona dan kak Ananda nihhh!! Menarikk bangett kan pembahasan kali ini, yuk langsung aja dengeriinn!!! ✨✨

If you enjoy the podcast then do like share and follow

Sejujurnya, ketika Mindem mendengar frasa Demokrasi di Tempat Kerja, maknanya kadang kepecah jadi dua Di Sesi 1 adalah makna yg pertama, yaitu kepemilikan dan hak atas profitnya bagi pekerja

Global Policy Watch: Chronicle Of A Crisis Foretold Reflections on global policy issues — RSJA major state election (Karnataka) is coming up this week. But there's hardly anything worth analysing. The Congress seemed to have a slight edge in the early opinion polls, but that's wearing thin. The BJP, always with its ears to the ground, has cranked up its poll machinery in the last couple of weeks drawing upon the star power of the PM in the urban areas of the state. The friendly media houses have been mobilised to pick up ‘emotive' issues that would tilt the scale in favour of the party in power. It is not too difficult to figure out what the average voter wants if you go by the opinion polls and surveys. But those substantive issues just don't feature in the public discourse. If you read the papers or media reports on what's being debated among parties in Karnataka, it is about who is a Hindu hater, who prostrates more often before deities and how going back to the OPS (old pension scheme) is such a wonderful idea. In the classical model of how representative democracy ought to work, the voters would have a limited view of how the world works, and it is the representative who owes the voters not only his labour but also his judgment on issues (to riff on Burke). That seems to be inverted here. One set of representatives has, over the last few years, instituted all kinds of targeted laws - hijaab ban, anti-conversion laws, scrapping minority quotas and cow slaughter ban - in the hope that they will yield electoral gains. The other set is talking of another set of bans convenient to them and some really bad economic policies. We often say that this newsletter attempts to change the demand side of the political equation by making people more aware of public policies and demanding better from their representatives. What we have here is the public demanding the right kind of things (if opinion polls are to go by), but their representatives are keen on dragging them back to divisive emotive issues. The Karnataka election will be a good test of what prevails eventually. I can almost see the straight line from these polls to the general elections due almost exactly 12 months from now. We will all be debating similar trivial issues than what really should matter to India. For some reason, that doesn't make for a good topic of debate. It makes any election analysis a waste of time, really. Switching gears, as I finished writing my last week's edition on what the US Fed refuses to learn from the SVB collapse, another mid-sized US bank, the First Republic Bank (FRB), went down and was sold to J.P. Morgan, the ultimate backstop in the US financial system. No amount of assurance from FDIC to the depositors of the bank nor the combined infusion of capital about a month back from a consortium of big banks into FRB was enough to stanch the outflow of deposits. Soon the bank was insolvent, the shareholders and bondholders lost everything, and J.P. Morgan was given enough of a sweet deal to pick up the pieces. I'm sure the Fed will come out with another report on the FRB collapse where it will blame the management for not hedging its treasury risks and being lax in its risk practices. There will be a light rap to the supervisors and staff from Fed who monitored FRB, and that will be that. I hope there's some more introspection by the Fed than that. Because as the shares of PacWest and Western Alliance have sunk over the last two days, it is clear that a number of mid-sized banks are going to collapse in slow-motion and end up in the lap of J.P. Morgan or FDIC very soon. The feeble Fed response was a 25 bps hike in rates last week with a strong indication that it will hit the pause button on hikes now. The question is if that's enough to structurally save many of these banks.I have argued for the past couple of months (just after the SVB collapse) that there are three problems for the Fed to contend with, and there are no real answers for them. It is Hail Mary time. Choose the best among the worst options and brace for the impact. I will lay out the three problems it faces before suggesting what looks like the best of the worst option that the Fed has chosen. First, the Fed continued raising interest rates to fight inflation without thinking through its impact on the banking system. This much is clear now. The surprises that have come up in the shape of SVB, Signature and FRB weren't anticipated at all. As the interest rates rose, the value of the long-term assets held by banks has fallen while their liabilities, in the form of deposits, which tend to be shorter in term, haven't fallen as much. The slowdown in the economy has meant there's not enough demand for credit at elevated rates, which means banks continue to invest in long-term US treasury bills. Every time the rates go up, these held-to-maturity (HTM) assets take a notional mark-to-market loss. A recent report by the Hoover Institution suggests that at this moment, the US Banking system's market value of assets is about $ 2 trillion below their book value. In an article on Yahoo Finance, Ambrose Evan-Pritchards writes:The second and third biggest bank failures in US history have followed in quick succession. The US Treasury and Federal Reserve would like us to believe that they are “idiosyncratic”. That is a dangerous evasion.Almost half of America's 4,800 banks are already burning through their capital buffers. They may not have to mark all losses to market under US accounting rules but that does not make them solvent. Somebody will take those losses.“It's spooky. Thousands of banks are underwater,” said Professor Amit Seru, a banking expert at Stanford University. “Let's not pretend that this is just about Silicon Valley Bank and First Republic. A lot of the US banking system is potentially insolvent.”The second problem, which kind of starts giving this a contagion feel, is the state of the commercial property market in the US. Interest rates have moved up too fast, the slowdown is real with many large employers laying off people, so there's no real need for commercial capacity, and the excess liquidity fuelled by the Fed during the pandemic meant additional capacity was built up cheaply, which now has no takers. What's worse, the rapid increase in rates means that a lot of these loans that will come up for refinancing soon (at higher rates) will face defaults. The mid-sized regional banks have a sizable exposure to commercial real estate, with estimates that about two-thirds of all commercial property borrowing comes from them. From the same Yahoo Finance article:Packages of commercial property loans (CMBS) are typically on short maturities and have to be refinanced every two to three years. Borrowing exploded during the pandemic when the Fed flooded the system with liquidity. That debt comes due in late 2023 and 2024.Could the losses be as bad as the subprime crisis? Probably not. Capital Economics says the investment bubble in US residential property peaked at 6.5pc of GDP in 2007. The comparable figure for commercial property today is 2.6pc.But the threat is not trivial either. US commercial property prices have so far fallen by just 4pc to 5pc. Capital Economics expects a peak to trough decline of 22pc. This will wreak further havoc on the loan portfolios of the regional banks that account for 70pc of all commercial property financing.Estimates vary, but it is likely that even a 10-15 per cent increase in default rates on commercial property when the refinancing chickens come home to roost could mean about $ 100 billion in losses for banks. And these are real losses, not the notional variety sitting on the books. Will the regional banks be able to weather this? And what happens if 4-5 of them catch a cold together in this portfolio? The risk of contagion flowing up the banking food chain is real.Lastly, the Fed, FDIC and the government took the extraordinary step of guaranteeing all deposits after the collapse of SVB to reassure depositors and not have further runs on mid-sized banks. But that didn't stop the ever-increasing deposit erosion for FRB during April. People can do the math, and they realise there's no way the government can fill a giant hole in case there's a real deposit run. The FDIC, after all, has a little over $ 100 billion to act as insurance for such an eventuality. That's loose change in the broader scheme of things. So, the depositors will flee the more you try and convince them all's well. Plus, the blanket deposit backstop has meant there's a moral hazard built right there for the management not to be too worried about the nature of deposits they bring or the risk of serious asset-liability mismatches. At the time of SVB collapse, I wrote in edition # 205:I guess one way to look at this is if you let fiscal dominance become the central canon of how you manage your economic policy, you will eventually reach the same place as other economies (mostly developing) that have indulged in the same for years. The monetary authorities in the U.S. have been accommodating the fiscal profligacy of the treasury for years. This was accentuated during the pandemic. Trillions of dollars were pumped in to save the economy. I'm not sure how much the economy needed saving then. But that bill has come now. First in the shape of inflation, followed by rapid, unprecedented rate hikes and the inevitable accidents that are showing up now. Almost certainly, a recession will follow. Isomorphic mimicry of Latin American monetary policy indeed.Now, back to Evans-Pritchard and his article in Yahoo Finance:The root cause of this bond and banking crisis lies in the erratic behaviour and perverse incentives created by the Fed and the US Treasury over many years, culminating in the violent lurch from ultra-easy money to ultra-tight money now underway. They first created “interest rate risk” on a galactic scale: now they are detonating the delayed timebomb of their own creation.Chris Whalen from Institutional Risk Analyst said we should be wary of a false narrative that pins all blame on miscreant banks. “The Fed's excessive open market intervention from 2019 through 2022 was the primary cause of the failure of First Republic as well as Silicon Valley Bank,” he said.Mr Whalen said US banks and bond investors (i.e. pension funds and insurance companies) are “holding the bag” on $5 trillion of implicit losses left by the final blow-off phase of the Fed's QE experiment. “Since US banks only have about $2 trillion in tangible equity capital, we have a problem,” he said.Going back to the original question I posed - what will Fed do given these problems on hand? I guess it has decided to choose what it thinks is the least worst option. It cannot let go of its fight against inflation. It has to find a way to avoid recession. So, all it can afford is a controlled banking crisis. An oxymoron if ever there was one. But that's where we are headed, where we will see things unfold in a slow but almost predictable manner. The Fed will try and boost the banks' capital in the meantime and hope the best of them brave through this without any risk of contagion. Anyway, in the worst case, there's always Jamie Dimon and his chequebook.Thanks for reading Anticipating the Unintended! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support our work.Numbers that Ought to Matter: In April 2023, the Union Health Minister reported that India has 108,000 MBBS seats in 660 colleges and 118,000 BSc nursing seats in approx 900 colleges. The total number of seats on offer is quite low, despite the large number of colleges. On average, each medical college has 163 seats, and each nursing college has just 131 seats. Government policy should focus on helping existing colleges increase their intake. For more context, read edition #159.India Policy Watch #1: Coal is Out? Naah.Insights on issues relevant to India— Pranay KotasthaneEarlier this week, I came across this Business Standard report:“India plans to stop building new coal-fired power plants, apart from those already in the pipeline, by removing a key clause from the final draft of its National Electricity Policy (NEP), in a major boost to fight climate change, sources said.”My prior assumption was that given coal-based power's lower costs, India would construct many more coal-powered plants over the next two decades to meet a growing economy's demand. Hence, this news item came as a bit of a surprise. So I went through the draft National Electricity Plan to understand the reasoning.Before we dive in, some bureaucratic knots that need untangling. The cited “final draft” of the National Electricity Policy is nowhere to be found on the Ministry of Power website. But I could find an earlier draft on the IIT Kanpur's Centre for Energy Regulation website! A Policy document such as this only lists the priorities and steers the sector. From it arises a Plan that's to be released every five years by the Central Electricity Authority. The Plan document is the real deal as it does demand projections through an ‘Electric Power Survey'. It then presents the energy generation mix required to meet the projected demand scenarios. A part of this elusive plan document was released, after many delays, in September 2022. Some relevant insights from the plan:* The current installed power capacity of ~400GW split looks as follows:* By FY32, it is projected that India's energy demand will be 2538 Billion Units, and peak power demand will be 363 GW, up from 1624 Billion Units and peak demand of 216 GW in FY23. * Coal+Lignite accounted for 52.7% of total installed capacity in FY23.* Using a planning tool that optimises for factors such as fuel availability, operational availability, and sustainability, the Plan throws up a required power generation capacity mix.* After taking all these constraints into account, the Plan finds that by FY32, India would need an additional installed coal capacity of 42.6 GW in the base case scenario and 53.6 GW in the increased-demand scenario. * Around 25.6 GW of capacity addition is already in various stages of execution.Now, we come to the report claiming a ban on additional coal capacity addition beyond the current in-progress projects. It essentially means that to meet the projected demand, India will have to find other sources to compensate for coal. In the best case, an additional 17 GW capacity will have to be conjured up; and in the worst-case scenario, nearly 28 GW capacity will have to be compensated. This additional capacity goes beyond the planned additions in clean energy generation. That's why I am sceptical about this news report. It's unlikely that government will make a blanket commitment.If we assume the report to be true, advancing the date of halting further coal power generation will require compensation by another reliable source to provide the base load. Only two options can be imagined with today's technology — nuclear energy and Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS).Nuclear energy accounts for just 2 per cent of the total power generation mix today. The current plan already assumes a threefold increase in nuclear power capacity addition. For it to absorb the slack of stopping further coal addition, it has to reach six to eight times the current capacity. Given that nuclear power generation faces the problem of high capital costs and invites protests, scaling it up is tough unless the Small Modular Reactor (SMR) technology breakthrough leads to mass adoption in India. Maybe for this reason, the government is “considering” overturning a ban on FDI in nuclear power. Expanding BESS capacity also depends on the ability to develop Lithium refining expertise and bring other options, such as Sodium-ion batteries, online. So, stopping the building of new coal-fired power plants requires far too many other pieces of the puzzle to fall into place. Keep watching this space.Tailpiece: check out this Puliyabaazi episode on the chemistry, geopolitics, and significance of Lithium-ion batteries.India Policy Watch #2: Lessons from Apple's India Journey Thus FarInsights on issues relevant to India— Pranay KotasthaneApple's quarterly results are out. Its India revenue registered double-digit growth, prompting Tim Cook to make the now-commonplace “India is at a tipping point” statement. The last seven years have been stunning for Apple's India business. From being shunned away by the government for their plan to import and sale of refurbished phones to becoming a poster child of electronics manufacturing in India, Apple's India strategy has come a long way.I've always wanted to know how Apple raised its India game and whether there are broader lessons for Indian public policy from this experience. So I was delighted to read Surajeet Das Gupta's Business Standard article narrating Apple's tryst with Indian public policy. Das Gupta identifies these milestones and speed-breakers:* In 2016, after denying the import-refurbish-sell request, Apple was told to start manufacturing in India if it wanted to set up Apple-owned retail stores.* In 2017, Apple put forward two pre-conditions for starting manufacturing in India:* “15-year duty concessions (on capital equipment, components, consumables for smartphones).. and a reduction in customs duty on completely knocked down and semi-knocked down devices to be assembled in India.” * relaxation of 30 per cent local sourcing directive for foreign direct investment (FDI) in single-brand retail stores.* After both its asks were rejected, it set up an India team to work with the government and mobile phone industry associations.* After three years of lobbying, the government relented by allowing the 30 per cent local norm to be met as an average for the first five-year period, not annually. Then the government agreed to qualify the value added by Apple's contract manufacturers in India—regardless of the destination of these products—as “local sourcing”.* The government allowed Apple to set up an online store before the physical store if it brought over $200 million FDI and extracted a commitment that the online store couldn't get into heavy discounting.* When PLI rules were modified to accommodate Samsung's entry, Apple went along with the change.* After the government made the entry of FDI from China in the Indian tech sector arduous due to the Galwan clash, Apple worked with the industry body to get 12 of its Chinese suppliers approved on the condition that they would enter into joint ventures with Indian partners who would have a majority stake. (We wrote about it in edition #199).Take a breath. And it has only been seven years. There are three ways of interpreting this journey from a public policy perspective.First, to the extent that the government has been able to capture Apple's China manufacturing—even if in a really small way—its approach can be called a limited success. The government can rightfully claim that Apple's supply chain has created over a lakh jobs in India. Grabbing some part of the manufacturing of the world's biggest company has a signalling effect as well. It will also help Apple's Indian partners upgrade technologically and raise their standards. Second, Apple's up-and-down journey also serves as a warning. If the world's most well-known company had to jump as many hoops, what chance does a smaller company have? How many other businesses will have the money and patience to set up India teams that negotiate with the government to remove roadblocks, one by one, calmly? And the approval of Apple's Chinese suppliers shows that the government is comfortable making pro-business exemptions but is uncomfortable making pro-market relaxations. There's a risk of going overboard with the “market access in return for manufacturing” approach. A policy analyst must also pop the opportunity cost question. Could the government have spent precious state capacity elsewhere by following a general easing of these constraints? How many companies did India lose in the process of playing hardball with Apple? And what about the Indian consumers - what did they lose as a result of these overbearing conditions? These are tough questions to answer.Third, this journey shows that technology policy is shaping up rather well in India. Industry associations and public advocacy departments of companies are now able to put forward their demands and grouses in front of governments in a far more transparent manner. Not just that, they are able to get governments to modify policies as well.In my view, all three interpretations are simultaneously true. But this is just the beginning of India's electronics manufacturing journey. The steps required to strengthen it might be drastically different from the approach required to start it.HomeWorkReading and listening recommendations on public policy matters* [Article] Here's a RestofWorld Q&A on the US-China chip war and its implications for India featuring one of us.* [Story] FT has an excellent visual explainer on quantum computing this week.* [Article] Niranjan Rajadhyaksha's Mint column comparing Asian countries when their median age was 28 like India's is today, is insightful. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit publicpolicy.substack.com

... --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/cover0crew/support

New Season Y'all.Team Desis is back with another season of our very hot, fun and sizzling with opinion on toast podcast.We know you will find it fun to download as you make your way to the gym to shed those extras but let us tell you one BIG Truth.It does not make a difference to us. We love you anyway!So this first week of the New Year - how about Cirkus? Naah! IT was bad. Hear what we thought abou this #RanveerSingh flick.Then there was Mr Hot in #TaraVBilal - yes folks the enigmatic #HarshvardhanRane. Gosh, he is so hot that we couldn't get our eyes off him. The movie is a super fun watch. We recommend.Pitchers S2 ? Hmmm... Okay but only if you have nothing else to do - the story needs to transition into an Office season - says Michael. Hear that #tvf? #zee5?#KathmanduConnectionS2 takes off where it ended in S1 but didn't get u gushing.Watch if you must on #Sonyliv.That's all from us for the week.Hope your New Year is everything you wish and hope for.LoveTeam Desis.Desislive podcast delivers the latest movie and show reviews to your devices. Wherever in the world you are, tune in to desislive.

W pierwszym odcinku Podcastexu o Mariuszu Maksie Kolonce rozmawialiśmy o tym, skąd wziął się jeden z najpopularniejszych polskich dziennikarzy lat dziewięćdziesiątych i zerowych. W drugim postanowiliśmy podyskutować z tym popularnym mitem na jego temat, że gość odpłynął dopiero w ostatnich latach. Naah – już kilkanaście lat temu widoczne były pewne… symptomy. I mamy na to dowód w postaci książki “Odkrywanie Ameryki. Zapiski w jeepie” z roku 2006. Nie jest to przewodnik po Ameryce, nie jest to też autobiografia. W sumie nie do końca wiadomo, co to jest. Max dzieli się z czytelnikami swoimi zaoceanicznymi przygodami – również erotycznymi – a poza tym szczegółowo opisuje różne historyczne zgony, chwali się, że wszędzie był pierwszy i dzieli się swymi przemyśleniami na temat upadku Ameryki oraz na temat piersi kobiet, które spotkał (i których nie spotkał też). Zapraszamy do 71. odcinka Podcastexu!

Om man älskar varandra ska man bo ihop och dela på allt, visst? Naah, många par trivs alldeles utmärkt med att ha separata hem. Mindre vardagsgnabb, bättre kommunikation och mindre nyfamiljs-rådd är några av de fördelar som nämns i breven podden fått. Men varför ses särboende av många som ett mindre seriöst upplägg än samboende?

Rudy Giuliani couldn't possibly make it to Atlanta today to chat with that special Fulton County Grand Jury because his heart condition prevented him from getting on a plane. So, a Fulton County judge, not wanting Giuliani to suffer a broken heart for missing that conversation, postponed his appearance 'til next week. And in a total, "Bless your heart!" momemnt, the judge said if he still can't get on a plane, they'll even sport him a bus ticket to get his rear to his second favorite city on Earth. (Can you imagine?!); Sen. Lindsey Graham's [R-SC] attorneys didn't even pull the doctor's note card, but instead just aruged that same U.S. Constitution thingy Trump is accused of trying to circumnavigate shields Graham from having to testify at all; and Georgia GOP officials (the same ones who re-drew districts that now dillute into oblivion any cohesive Black democratic voting block) tell a court, Naah, race has NOTHING to do with why it's impossible for Black people in Georgia to elect a fellow African-American to office. NOTHING. It's their fault, actually. Somehow. Just trust us. Oh, and will you please put the PSC race back on the ballot for November? You're the best!See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Attention everyone! The Royals coaches are in the house. Put on your earphones and gear up for a fun ride as the cricketing royalty takes centre stage.  Our Head of Academy Coaching Sid Lahiri is joined by Director of Cricket and Head Coach Kumar Sangakkara, Fast Bowling Coach Lasith Malinga and Assistant Coach Trevor Penney in a fresh new episode of The Royals Podcast.  Listen in as Sanga talks about his journey from being a cricketer to becoming a coach, and hear Lasith explain what goes into the making of a modern-day T20 bowler. And more importantly, we get closer to finding out how old Trevor really is. Naah, that's still a mystery! Ready to dive in?

Special guest this week JP. Hay learned some new things about the female anatomy, and his mind is blown…especially because the percentage of women who do not orgasm. JP gives us her definition of what a bad bitch is. How do you like your partner, medium ugly or Naah…and what even is medium ugly?Hay says he's a love doctor, but has no successful couples on his resume. JP doesn't like tall women with short guys, she thinks they look weird. Do you believe in destiny? Do you think that we live many lives in one lifetimes, or that we love many lifetimes? JP and Hay talk it all out. Have you ever wondered what people's idea of you are? Who are you? 30 years from now, how do you see yourself, and what would you put in a time capsule for yourself to open then? JP, and Hay gives us a sneak preview. Hay also tells JP about how he looked up to her older brother Peanut growin up. Don't ever let anyone tell you anything different, but hood dudes need love too. JP tells us why she loves being a Black woman, and talks about her views on life and mortality. 90's R&B and Rap remains undefeated. A message from JP, “Live life honorably”. --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/hayden-still/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/hayden-still/support

YouTube HQ Link: https://youtu.be/CXhuhw_icnI Alternate D/W Link: https://bit.ly/37M3C5e Give Your Valuable Feedbacks!

Full video interview available here: https://youtu.be/oJbZF1yiWvg  Guest Bio: Aino Vonge Corry (born 1971 in Aarhus, Denmark) is an independent consultant, who sometimes works as an agile coach. After gaining her Ph.D. in Computer Science in 2001 she spent the next 10 years failing to choose between being a researcher/teacher in academia, and being a teacher/facilitator in industry. She eventually squared the circle by starting her own company, Metadeveloper, which develops developers by teaching CS, teaching how to teach CS, inviting speakers to IT conferences, and facilitating software development in various ways. She has facilitated retrospectives and other meetings for the past 15 years during which time she has made all the mistakes possible in that field. Aino has lived in Stockholm, Lund, and Cambridge, but she is now back in Aarhus, Denmark, where she lives with her family, and a growing collection of plush cephalopods.   Social Media/ Website LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/in/aino-vonge-corry-9a23801 Twitter: @apaipi Website: https://metadeveloper.com   Books/ Resources Retrospectives Antipatterns by Aino Corry https://www.amazon.co.uk/Retrospectives-Antipatterns-Aino-Corry/dp/013682336X Coaching Agile Teams by Lyssa Adkins https://www.amazon.co.uk/Coaching-Agile-Teams-ScrumMasters-Addison-Wesley/dp/0321637704 Agile Retrospectives by Diana Larsen, Esther Derby https://www.amazon.co.uk/Agile-Retrospectives-Making-Pragmatic-Programmers/dp/0977616649 Retrospectives for Organisational Change by Echstein https://www.amazon.com/Retrospectives-Organizational-Change-Agile-Approach-ebook/dp/B07NS796KY Fearless Change Patterns by Linda Rysen https://www.amazon.com/Fearless-Change-Patterns-Introducing-Ideas-ebook/dp/B0054RGYNQ Prime Directive by Norm Kirk https://retrospectivewiki.org/index.php?title=The_Prime_Directive   Full Interview Transcript Ula Ojiaku: Many thanks Aino for making the time for this conversation and for being my guest on the Agile Innovation Leaders podcast. Aino Corry:  And thank you for inviting me, Ula. It was great to have you in the course, you had a lot of good questions. And that's how we met. And I've been looking very much forward to this day. Ula Ojiaku: So could you tell us a bit about yourself, you know, who is Aino Corry? Aino Corry: Yeah, so Aino Corry is 50 years old, she lives in Denmark, she's got three children. And she, she's always wanted to teach. Actually when I was in primary and secondary school, I wasn't so happy with mathematics teaching, so I decided after school, I wanted to be a mathematics teacher in secondary school. Actually, I thought about it and I thought I didn't really like school. So maybe I should be a teacher in high school instead. And so I decided to try to go to university to study mathematics to become a high school teacher. But then I had to do some programming in the mathematics course. And I really, really fell in love with that. So I changed subject to computer science. And then I did my Master's degree with a focus on design patterns, which was very new at the time. And when I finished, I wanted to continue working with design patterns. And that's why I applied for a Ph.D. I applied for a Ph.D., actually, just to prolong my university studies to make more of the fun thing that I've done. And then when I finished, I thought, I wanted to be a researcher and a teacher and I had a job at the university as an assistant professor. Aino Corry: And then I decided that I wanted to go out in industry instead, because I, I had a child already, and I wanted to have another child. And I really, I was dead poor, so I wanted to earn a lot of money, so I went down industry to get some money. And that worked, I got some money. And after a few years there, I went back to university to do some research and some teaching, because they had a research project, which was interesting. It was when Bluetooth was quite young and was about programming pervasive computing devices, what you would call IoT today, yes. And then I was there for a few years, and then went back to the industry, and was there for a few years. And then I went back to university. And then I did my research in how to teach computer science and how people learn. So that was also interesting. But then I wanted to stop again because then I was full-time at university and I also did some consulting in the IT industry. So I thought I would go back to the industry. Aino Corry: And then I thought, Naah, I want to do something else. I want to be my own boss, I don't want to work that much anymore. I had three children at the time. So I decided to be an independent IT consultant, thinking that then I would work less, that was a huge mistake. I, I like having my own company, but I wouldn't say that I work less because if you have a job and you have a boss, you can tell your boss ‘Oh, it's too much. I don't want to do that much. And please take some of the tasks away from me.' But when you're your own boss, and you're a time optimist, like I can be, you think ‘I can do that. And I can do that.' And especially now with COVID, it's even worse because at least prior to this, I had to calculate time in to get from one meeting to another, you know, from one client to another from one country to another. But now I can actually I can work with clients in four different countries in a day. And I've actually, one week I spoke at six different conferences in one week. So normally I would only be at one conference. So it's actually made me a little bit confused and looking very much forward to actually spending time on trains and planes and cars again, Ula Ojiaku: To have the downtime… Aino Corry:  Yes, I thought I'd never miss that, but I do, so I guess I guess that's my career. Ula Ojiaku:  Great. Now, just a little bit more about your research you did on teaching, on how to teach computer science. Now I would expect there would be an intersection of you know, disciplines; it wouldn't just be computer science itself. Was there an element of maybe psychology (of), you know, how people learn and all that? Aino Corry: Yeah, it was a lot of that it was about, well, the psychological aspects of how people react to different, being in different situations, and being spoken to in different ways. And there was something that I don't think maybe you call it neurology but thinking about how to model the brain in order to make it remember what you're saying. And just something like what does it actually mean to learn something? And in Danish, the word for teaching and learning is the same word, but in English teaching and learning are two different words. And that's actually a subtle difference, which is a big difference, which makes it maybe even harder for me as a Dane to start thinking about this because you think about it as the same process. Aino Corry: But it's two very different processes. And one of the biggest things that I learned when I started doing research and teaching, and that was after having taught for 16 years or something like that, the thing that I learned was that I was so immensely focused on how to condense this book into presentations and assignments so that the students could listen to me and do the assignments. I didn't think enough about the relation between the student and the material. So I was thinking more about the relation between me and the material, and me and the student. So the really important thing is that, when you have any sort of conversation with people, it's a student, or it's a presentation that you're doing, what you want to do is that you want to change their brains really, right. But you can't see the change in the brains. So you need to figure out how can I, how can I assess that they've changed the brain? So, the first thing you have to do is think about what is it actually that you want them to be able to do differently? Do you want them to say something else? Do you want them to be able to program, to design, to facilitate, what is it that you want them to do? Because then you can set up? What is the assessment? How do you assess what they can do? Do they actually have to look at the design at an oral exam? Do they have to process some words in a written exam? What is it that you want them to do? And then when you know what you want them to do to assess it, then you can figure out what is it that you want them to do while training do you want them to do the same when you're training them, that they have to do in the assessment. Aino Corry: So that the exam is actually what they have been doing for the past hour, month, year, instead of examining something completely different than what they have been doing. And then when you know all that, then you start thinking about okay, so what material do I need for them to read? And that's, that's actually the last thing. And prior to this, I would take a book and I would think, this is the thing that I want to put in their brains. And then at the exam, I would ask them, do you understand that? Can you explain that, but maybe they never explained it during the course, maybe they just did exercises or something like that. So that was one of the most surprising things is I guess, maybe it's neurology, maybe it's psychology, it's definitely different. It's lending, from different fields. And, and you can say that the computer science part of it is actually the least part. But the interesting part about computer science and teaching computer science or natural sciences is that it's mostly not so much about discussing things. It's more about being able to understand things and relate things and apply things. Now, I guess well, you can say that all issues, all subjects are like that. But with the natural sciences, it's much more about understanding the world, changing the world. So yeah, I think it's very interesting, but also trying to explain difficult subjects to people. How do you actually do that? Ula Ojiaku: So you've already mentioned that you, you know, started your business because you wanted to be an independent, and then you realized, oh, well, there are other things because as a business owner, you probably would do all the other admin tasks that someone else would have in person. Yeah. Now, am I right? In the understanding, you still run, you know, your business, which is the meta developer, right? Do you have employees right now? Aino Corry: No, I don't, and I don't want to. And I've had a lot of people asking me over the years if I want to employ somebody and I, I did try once for just a small gig that I needed a helping hand and I employed that person and that person was not a problem, but all the extra paperwork, with taxes and insurances, and what do I know. So if I'm working with people, now they have their own company, and then they can send me an invoice and then I can pay them like that because I really want to be independent and five, no six years ago, my family and I, we moved to Cambridge in the UK for a year. And it was so easy for me, I could just do it because even though I had to really work a lot less because I didn't have my network in England and I had three kids who had to move to a different country so I had to focus on them. I could just do it, I could just work less and not make any money or almost no money. Because I didn't, I wasn't responsible to anybody, I was only responsible to myself. That gives me the freedom that I want to have. And during COVID I lost everything in my book. My calendar just was empty. Wow. And I didn't know how to continue with the company. But I only had to worry about myself. I didn't have to worry about anybody that I employed. So that was nice. Ula Ojiaku: Yes, I completely agree. I mean, it would be a lot of responsibility, having other people's livelihood as well as yours to think about that. Yeah,  Aino Corry: Especially. I mean, this is such a fluid thing. It's difficult to promise anything. Ula Ojiaku: Now, but hopefully, with the, you know, lockdown restrictions on I mean, unfortunately, we're still not out, you know of the red and unfortunately, many lives have been lost, and many people have been affected but it seems like there is light at the end of the tunnel with the (covid) vaccination (roll-out) and all that. So would you say your calendar is filling up again? Aino Corry: Yes, it actually became overfilled, yeah during COVID. Because my book came out. So I had hoped that when my book came out, I would travel everywhere in the world and sign my books. Unfortunately, that couldn't happen because of COVID. But that's the least of the things that could happen to people during COVID. I've been very lucky. But my book came up... Ula Ojiaku: Retrospectives Antipatterns… Aino Corry: Yes. and, and that meant that there were a lot of people who wanted to talk to me about retrospectives, which was why I wrote the book. So that was great. So I don't know if it had filled up as easily without the book, but it definitely helped, I think. But I'm looking so much forward to getting out and speaking at conferences again. I taught at the university yesterday, and I will again tomorrow. And that was in real life. It was so nice, people were laughing and we were clapping. And we were like doing icebreaker exercises where we were standing up and moving towards each other. And it was really nice. Ula Ojiaku: Yeah, I mean, nothing can ever replace that, you know, face-to-face in-person interaction. Whilst we're grateful for technology, you know, for bridging the gap, you know, but once in a while, it's definitely important. Yeah. Great. Now, so since you've shown us your book, Retrospectives Antipatterns. And you've talked about it briefly, why don't we delve into that a bit. And for the audience who are listening either (via) audio or video only, there will be the links to the, you know, to the book, and other resources that we touch on in the show notes. So what you said people were, you know, asking you lots of questions about retrospectives, and asking for advice, which was one of the motivations for writing the book. Could you tell us the story behind that? Aino Corry: I love to tell the story behind the book. Thank you for asking, Ula. So I started facilitating Retrospectives because Linda Rising gave me a book by Norman Kerth called Project Retrospectives. And then I started facilitating them. And then Diana Larsen and Esther Derby wrote a book about Agile Retrospectives - Making Good Teams Great, which condensed all the retrospective activities into smaller bite-sized ones that you can use after each sprint. And I facilitated retrospectives at in the time I worked for a company called Trifle, inside Trifle with the customers. When I went back to university, I facilitated retrospectives there. And I just really, really liked it. I even facilitated retrospectives with my family and myself, and everybody basically who couldn't get away. And I, I got a lot of experience. And then once I was at a conference that I'd been part of organizing the conference and inviting speakers and what I do at these conferences is that if a speaker gets sick, or can't be there, then I fill in with a presentation. So they came to me and asked me is ‘Could you fill in with a presentation? Just 20 minutes?' ‘Okay, I said, When do you want it?' And they said ‘In 20 minutes, and we would want it to be a new talk, could you do that?' I was like, how can I? How can I prepare a new talk in 20 minutes for a 20-minute talk? And then I thought the only thing that I really, really know about that I can talk about for lengths, are all the mistakes that I'm continuously making when facilitating retrospectives So I thought this is definitely something I can talk about. So I just, I just, I think I drew some pictures, or I found some pictures online. And then I just spoke out from those I, I spoke about three different things that I called Antipatterns for Retrospectives, things that often go wrong for me and how to solve it. So not just explaining the problems, but also how to get out of the problem situation. And they really liked it. And then I started giving that talk. And I extended it to 45 minutes to an hour, I extended it to a day. And people kept asking me, ‘Where can we read more about this?' And I said you can't really because it's, it's in my head. And then somebody said ‘Maybe we you should write a book.' And so I thought I'm not going to write a book, I already did my Ph.D. dissertation, and I'm not doing that again. Not the best part of it for me. But then I started just writing, you know, first, it was just a few Word documents that I shared with people in my retrospective network. And they gave me feedback on that. And then I started a Leanpub book. And it turned out people wanted to buy the Leanpub book. So I thought, well, maybe I should add some more chapters. And then I thought it would be interesting to see if there's any publishers who would like to publish it. Aino Corry: And luckily, I have a very good network in IT, so I asked a lot of people who are already authors and, and Martin Fowler introduced me to somebody from Pearson, Greg Dench, and he, he read my book, the PDF that I sent from Leanpub, and he said that they thought they'd like to publish it. And there was a lot of back and forth and back and forth. And could you change the title? Because Antipatterns sounds so depressing and negative? And I said, but it is an Antipatterns, so I cannot. And then those things about I want this octopus, this big octopus? Ula Ojiaku: Yes, yes. Aino Corry: Well, it looks a little bit like a children's book, are you sure you want it to look like a children's book and I said actually, I'm, I'm really like a child myself. So I want it to be me. And then I said, and it has to be printed in color. Because I want all these Antipatterns to have not just a name, but also a picture. Because with Antipatterns, what you do is that you create an awareness, so I described, this is the context you're in, this is what normally happens, but that's the Antipattern solution. That's actually another good solution that gives you these drawbacks. But then you have the refactored solution, which gives you these benefits. And I want the patterns as well as Antipatterns, it sort of enables you to have a discussion and a higher level of extraction. So you can say, for instance, with patterns, you can say, then I use the observed or I implemented composite, and then you don't have to explain all the nitty gritty details. And it's the same with these Antipatterns. So instead of saying, ‘Well, we tried to vote, but then some people held up their vote, and I allowed them to do so. But maybe I could have done it differently', you can just say, well, then I ended in political votes. And there's also the name and then the picture because for some people, the name is easy to remember, but for other people, the picture. Ula Ojiaku: The pictures, yes. Aino Corry: I definitely am very visual. So I, I really remember pictures like that. And graphs, it really helps me understand I love UML, and when I work with architecture, it's very important for me to be able to draw these things. So that's how the book came about. And there were other publishers who didn't want it because they thought it was not technical enough or they didn't like the Antipatterns in the title or they thought it was too negative, but Pearson wanted it, so that's great. I'm very grateful for that. Ula Ojiaku: That's fantastic. Again, we'll have the link to the book in the show notes. And I mean, so I do identify with, you know, the things you said or where you kind of held your ground and in terms of how the book was meant to look for pictures. And if it's playful, it's easier to absorb. There is the saying in English, you know, a picture is worth more than a thousand words. Definitely. And in that way, you're kind of trying to cater for different people with different learning styles, because there are some of us who can read you know, but pictures kind of makes it, breaks it up and kind of, you know, conveys the message even more effectively in some instances. On that note though, are you, do you already have an audio version of it? Or do you think it would bode well as an audio version? Aino Corry: Yeah, that's a bit embarrassing, Ula, because I have narrated, I think five of the chapters. But then I stopped, but I will narrate it. I am doing it and it will happen, hopefully, yeah, but it turns out it's much more difficult to make an audiobook than you think I want to narrate it myself. I agree. Have you tried it? Ula Ojiaku: Well, no, just with, you know, starting the podcast and you know, kind of speaking, there is a whole lot to it. So I can imagine trying to bring a book to life, you know, kind of enunciating, and there'll be some places you need to emphasize. That's why I've never done it yet. But I can imagine. Aino Corry: Yeah, well, I could have hired an actor to do it, but I wanted it to be me, because it's my experience. It's, it's my voice that should be in this book. And then so I'm Danish and English is my second language. I normally think, Okay, I'm pretty good at English, I can speak fluent English, people understand what I'm saying I can express myself and the book is written in English. But then when you start recording it, and you'll listen to it afterwards, you make so many mistakes, or at least I do. So I have to repeat that again. So it just takes a lot longer than I thought, but it will be there, it's my plan. Ula Ojiaku: We'll be looking out for it, definitely, yeah. Okay, so, in your view, what are Retrospectives, and why are they important? Aino Corry: Well Retrospectives is a way for a team to set time aside to reflect on where they are, inspect, you'd say, and learn from, that, appreciate what happened, and see how can we improve going forward, the way that we communicate, the way that we work, the way that we program or design, or whatever we do. It's simply taking time aside to appreciate and inspect and then adapt to the situation. In a sense, it's the core of Agile, right, inspecting and adapting. And for a team to have regular Retrospectives, I think it's so important. Sometimes they'll think we don't have anything to talk about, we don't have any problems. But there's always something that can be improved, even if it's a small thing. And having those regular Retrospectives helps you remember, to continue to improve in all different aspects, but also, I think Retrospectives is a way to gain trust between team members, it's not the only thing you need to gain trust, but that sharing thing that showing, “Okay, that didn't go very well”, or “I need to learn this”, or “I got stuck with this”. But also, “I was really happy about this”, ”this made me so energetic, and really optimistic about these things”. It helps people understand each other as human beings and as sort of parts of the machinery or parts of the system, that's the team or even the organization. So I think it's important in all aspects. And for everybody. Ula Ojiaku: It's interesting, your definition of what a retrospective is, and I'd never really thought about it as a way for team members to, you know, build trust with themselves, so thanks for mentioning it, that really stood out for me, do you have any examples in your experience where, you know, this happened where there was maybe little or no trust and, you know, subsequently through the Retrospectives the team, started having more trust towards themselves? Aino Corry: I would like to say yes, but I have to say that when I realized in the retrospective that there's not enough trust, it is something that you have to work with also between the Retrospectives in a sense if there is not enough trust to share anything, then, then the retrospective will not be trust-building in itself, but it can help you reveal that there is not enough trust, and then you can start working with it, and to me trust is sort of the equation between relationships and that you can rely on people that you rely on people and you have a relationship. So if you have a relationship, if you know a little bit about each other as human beings, it makes it easy for you to trust people. And also if you can rely on other people, for instance, if they say, ‘Oh, I'll do this', then they'll do it. Or they'll say they can't do it, that's part of the trust as well. And if you understand, if you learn at the retrospective that there isn't enough trust, the retrospective can become a waste of time. Aino Corry: Because if they don't want to share the things that are really difficult, then you will just talk about the meal in the canteen, or whether we should have a meeting that's two hours long, or one hour long, or something like that, which is not really changing anything. It's usually things about how to give feedback or whether the code reviews can be done in this way or the other and whether we need to learn something more. So, but you can definitely be aware that there's trust issues that you can work on outside the retrospective, but then I think another important thing is that if they have already sufficient trust to be able to share things, then I've heard from a lot of people that it can, it can feel almost like team therapy to have a retrospective because they don't have to think about it, they can sort of relax and let the facilitator carry the conversation forward sometimes. And then if it can help them say, now, we talk about this, Now perhaps we've talked enough about this, now we should talk about this or could you see this from the other side, which is something that I sometimes do as well. So it can be a little bit conflict handling as well to be a facilitator to say what did you hear him say right now? Or can you imagine what his day was like yesterday or something like that? So it can be therapeutic if you want to, but that depends on the facilitator. You can also have a retrospective facilitator, which is perfectly fine, but only wants to talk about how we can improve the way that we actually design things, the architecture we make, the meetings we have, it can still be helpful, doesn't have to be therapy, but it can. Ula Ojiaku: Yeah. In running the retrospectives I would assume, I would imagine, there would be some sort of advanced preparation from a facilitative perspective. Now, would you when you get asked to do this by you know, other organizations and teams? Do you normally have a point person and you'd get the brief in terms of what they're trying to achieve from the point person, and that would set the agenda? So have you always found yourself sticking to the agenda? Or have you ever had to kind of flex depending on what you sense the team needs? Aino Corry: Yeah, I've definitely had to change my agenda. So if I get invited to facilitate a retrospective, I talk to the one who sponsors me to ask them why, why have you reached out? Do you already have Retrospectives? If you have Retrospectives, why do you need an external facilitator? What normally works for you in retrospective? What doesn't work? Is there any conflict? I should know about it? Is there anybody who's really quiet? Anybody who's really a loudmouth? Is there anything that can help me plan this retrospective in the right way? Then sometimes they say, oh, we'd really, really like this retrospective to focus on how they can learn as a team, or we'd really like this to focus on their communication with other teams. And then in some, sometimes I'll say, okay, so, so we'll say that's the theme for the retrospective. And then I'll let people know that that's a theme for the retrospective. But other times, if it's a new group, then I'll probably encourage that sponsor to allow me to make some, just a generic retrospective. So for a new group who has to work together, maybe he or she will allow me to create a futurespective for them, which is the kind of retrospective where you imagine that you're in the future, looking back at what happened. And then they say, okay, then we, then somebody got fired, or this didn't work, or the users hated it. Aino Corry: And the way that I have this futurespective, with the new team is that then I get to understand and they get to understand about each other. What do they hope and what do they feel will happen in this project, and then we can have action points, which will allow them to get the things that they hope and avoid the things that they fear. So sometimes I'll let the sponsor know, well, actually, we should do it a little bit different way. And sometimes I'll say, that's fine, we'll focus on that. But it is often so that you need to have an extra agenda when you prepare for a retrospective, at least a little bit. Because sometimes you suddenly end up in a situation where you have somebody who's speaking all the time or somebody who's really quiet. And then all the plenary discussions that you decided on, you can't have those because plenary discussions are not very nice if you have like a big difference in how much people wants to speak. And then you have to divide them into smaller groups, or you have to change it in writing. Or you have to make round robins where everybody takes turns in saying something, so just as an example. But it could also be that you notice that all the things that they're talking about are problematic, turns out to be things that we think are sort of out of their hands, not really something they can do anything about. And then if you spend all the time discussing things that you can't change, then it's just like a session where you're just complaining about everything. And in those cases, I sometimes get out the soup exercise that I learned from Diana Larsen where you make the three circles, things the team can do, things the team can influence, and then you have the soup outside. And then I say well out of all these problems that you're complaining about, how many of these are things you can do something about, how many of these things you can influence, how many of these things are in the soup, and for the things in the soup, you might just have to accept that this is the world we live in, like Corona right now. Yeah, It's what it is. Ula Ojiaku: Amazing. So, so what would you say would be, from what you've observed, I'm sure you've had a spectrum of or a continuum of teams from what you'd consider high performing to maybe people… I mean, a team that's still up and coming. What would be your view of the characteristics of a high-performing team? Aino Corry: Yeah, that's a good question. In my experience, it's not so much the individual's skill set that makes a high-performing team, an individual with the highest skill set can do a lot on its own. But if we talk about a high-performing team, it's about a team that can communicate, it's about a team where you feel there's psychological safety to say when you're stuck, or when you need help. Because if you're only working on what you want, first and foremost, and only helping other people, if you really have to, then it's not really high performing, and things will clot up and it'll be slow. One of the symptoms that I see in teams that are high-performing is that they're laughing together. So I evaluate sometimes teams based on how much they laugh, and not how much they laugh over each other, but how much they laugh together. And how, yeah, I think, I think it's a good litmus test. Because if they laugh together, then it makes them happier for each other, because the laughter starts, you know, all the happiness hormones in your brain and sensing around your body. So if you laugh together with somebody, you like them a bit more. And if you like them a bit more, you might trust them a bit more. And if you trust them a bit more, you might reach out and ask for help. Or you might offer help, when you see that somebody needs it. And if you are in an environment where you will you think that you can work freely, and you can speak freely, and you feel nice, then you're much more efficient together with other people. So that's what I see in high-performing teams. Ula Ojiaku: I mean, everything you've said because I was going to ask you to define for the benefit of the audience who might not be familiar with the term what psychological safety is? So would you say, you know, it's pretty much what you've broken down, you know, how much they laugh together, how safe they feel in asking for help, and, you know, yeah, being able to work together. Aino Corry: Yeah, I think that Gitte Klitgaard has, has taught me one of the most important things about psychological safety. And that is that it's actually not about being comfortable all the time, but it's about feeling comfortable about being uncomfortable. So even if you're saying something, which doesn't feel nice, you should still feel comfortable about it. And I think that's an interesting difference. So it's not just about making everybody feel good all the time and not having problems and only laughing and talking about positive things. That's not psychological safety. It's being okay to say I have a down day, or it's being okay to say that I don't understand what you're saying, or I feel negative, or I'm worried about this, or I don't think that this was done well enough, we could do it differently, that to me is psychological safety. Ula Ojiaku: Would you say that psychological safety, you know, having an environment that encourages the sense of psychological safety, is that only up to the team to foster? (If not) So who else would be involved, in your view? Aino Corry: I think that there's a culture in an organization and there can definitely be a culture of organizational safety and there can be a culture of non-psychological safety. And if, if the management is also showing that they're comfortable with saying uncomfortable things, I think that helps. If they're comfortable with saying, ‘Oh, we didn't do very well about that, or I made a mistake, or, if they're okay with telling people to do things differently, instead of making it really awkward or being very angry about it. That's, that's brilliant. And I remember one of the great managers, I had once that I made a huge mistake, that was really embarrassing. And when I noticed it, I felt so bad. I was beating myself up about it, but I had to tell my manager, and I had to come forward and say I messed up completely. And the way that he reacted was just wonderful. He said, ‘Well, we'll have to look into that. We'll have to figure out how we can change the process so that that doesn't happen again.' Because of course, I mean, I probably could have avoided that mistake if I thought about things in a different way. But what he said was that we should have a process where you know, that you should do this at this point in time, that should help you, support you. And I thought that was one of the things that created psychological safety for me because now I felt much safer about saying that I had a problem or made something wrong. Ula Ojiaku: In facilitating retrospectives, because you mentioned earlier that if there was anything you could talk about at length, you know, without needing preparation, it would be about the mistakes you've made in facilitating retrospectives. And hence, maybe they could also be some of you know, lead to some of the Antipatterns, could you share some of these Retrospective Antipatterns that you've observed? Aino Corry: So one of the Retrospective Antipatterns that I see most often or that I ran into most often myself is the one that I called Prime Directive Ignorance. So the Prime Directive is what Norman Kerth wrote about retrospectives. There was a longer text that states ‘everybody did the best they could at all times, and remember that before you enter a retrospective', but the problem is that, at least in some of the organizations that I've worked in with some of the people that have worked, they thought it was a bit ridiculous to expect that everybody did the best they could all the time. And to really believe that they couldn't have done any better, because they knew that somebody was slacking. They knew that somebody was being lazy. They also knew that they themselves didn't do the best they could. Aino Corry: So how could they really, genuinely believe that? So sometimes I've had retrospectives where I didn't, I didn't state that, I didn't say it out loud, I didn't state in an email or the invitation, I didn't say remember, this retrospective is not about finding a scapegoat or naming and blaming, it's about figuring out how we as a system of people can move on better together. And then I've had some awful retrospectives where some people had been made scapegoats, and they got really sad, and some of them left the retrospectives because they didn't feel safe. And then, and I think some of them may never have entered a retrospective again because it really ruined it for them because in their head now, the retrospective is a free for all, just sending arrows towards somebody, some poor person and shaming them and blaming them. So I think that the Prime Directive Ignorance Antipattern is one of the most important ones and the refactored solution, obviously, in the Prime Directive Ignorance is not to ignore the prime directive. So remember to bring it, put it on the poster in the wall, say it out loud, write it in the email, you can do it with your own words, it doesn't have to be in Kerth's words, if you like your own words better. But just make sure that people try to do that. Because the thing that Norman Kerth wanted to achieve with this was that people had the mindset of everybody did the best they could. But it's difficult to have that mindset. We're probably all brought up with our parents asking who left the milk out on the morning table? Who broke that vase, who started that fight, right? We're always trying to find a scapegoat and punish them. Although it's not very constructive, not even with children, and not even with grownups either to find that, it's, it's better to figure out how can they play? And where can they play so that they don't break the vase? How can we remind people to put milk into the refrigerator? Instead of saying you're stupid, you're forgetful, you're lazy, right. But I also appreciate that it might be a bit naive, that you might think, okay, but they could have just done a little better. But helping them out with processes, I think it's a good idea. Ula Ojiaku: With reference to the Prime Directive, you know, one of my mentors said something to me that also stuck which is that, you know, most people come to work wanting to do their best job, but sometimes it's the system that restricts them. So if we, like you said, you know, kind of move away from trying to find a scapegoat or someone to point the finger at, you know, to blame for what's going wrong, can we look at how we can shape the system in such a way that those things, you know, it would be hard to fall into those mistakes because the system is already shaped in a way that would help them focus on the right behaviours and practices and not fall into the wrong undesired ones? Yeah. Amazing. Any other Antipatterns you'd like to share? Aino Corry: Yeah, I think that the other one I'd like to share is one that I am becoming more and more aware of how important it is with so many people starting to facilitate retrospectives, because so many people are understanding how powerful it is. A lot of people who maybe aren't, let's say fully dressed, not very experienced in facilitating retrospectives are being thrown into facilitating retrospectives, by people thinking that it's easy. And it's not easy. It's really, really hard. It's hard to do it right. It's easy to understand, but it's difficult to do, it's like that one minute to learn, a lifetime to master. And a lot of people become disillusioned. So one of my retrospective anti-patterns is called the disillusioned facilitator. Because a lot of people are thrown into this role of oh, you can start facilitating retrospectives next week. And then they, maybe they hear something in a podcast like this, oh, this is an activity, you should definitely try it, or they read it online, and then they do it. But then probably they haven't done it before. They're doing it in real life the first time and they might be a bit, not really sure about it, not really having the heart in it. And people can feel that right away. And then they won't put their heart into it either, and then it will fall to the ground, you won't get what you expect to get out of it. So, I always encourage people when they start facilitating to try doing it in a sandbox, first, try out the activities with somebody that you trust and know, maybe you have some other people who want to learn how to facilitate retrospectives, and then you can try these activities out with them. Because explaining these activities can be difficult, coming up with examples that make people understand what they should do can be difficult. But also, really understanding what is the expected outcome, as we talked about right in the beginning Ula, the learning goals, what is it actually that you want to achieve? You're not doing the activity to do the activity, you're doing the activity to achieve something, to figure out what it is you want to achieve makes it easier to perform the right way. So with the disillusioned facilitator what I'm trying to say is, don't worry, you're doing your best the prime directive holds for you as well. Try it out with people, start with things that you're absolutely sure of, take boring activities for a start if you understand how to explain them. And if you understand what the expected outcome is. And we remember to debrief after the exercises to make sure that the people in the retrospective understand what they just got out of it. Because sometimes if you go just from one activity to the other, maybe they're wondering, why did we do that? Why did we spend half an hour on that? They don't understand that actually, what we got out of it was sharing this experience, or perhaps seeing the weight, how many people thought this or something like that? Ula Ojiaku Yeah, never assume, I guess is the cardinal rule there, don't assume, explain why you're doing what you're doing. You're carrying them along on a journey. And you have to (do so) like a good tour guide. This is what I, I tell the teams I coach or some of the coaches that I'm coaching: you're a tour guide, so you have to, you know you're saying ‘this is the destination we're going (to)' and as we get to some notable, you know, attraction points, call it out to them, because you can't assume that everyone is following. Aino Corry No, no Ula Ojiaku Amazing. Now what books, in addition to yours, can someone who wants to learn more about retrospectives and activities, ideas for activities to run during retrospectives? What books would you recommend to them? Aino Corry Well, the interesting thing about retrospectives is that there's a lot of different books that apply. Like when we talked about teaching computer science, it's not just computer science. It's also psychology, ethnography, neurology, things like that. And when you want to become a good retrospective facilitator, you also have to look at other things. You have to look at books about body language. A book that I keep returning to is the book Coaching Agile Teams (by) Lyssa Adkins. It's not necessarily about retrospectives, there is a little bit about that in there, but Coaching Agile Teams is about all the different ways of thinking about helping people coming from this place to this place. And that's actually what retrospectives is about. But also Jutta Eckstein has written the book Retrospectives for Organizational Change. And I think that's important as well to think about retrospectives in a different setting because then you might see that okay, so these retrospectives that you have been asked to do every sprint for a team, maybe that's actually something you can use for the whole organization to help a change or something like that. So I think sort of not just talking about the retrospective books, but other books in general about coaching or communication are very important. Ula Ojiaku: Fantastic. So are you on social media? And how can the audience who would want to get in touch with you do so? Aino Corry: Yeah, I'm on LinkedIn. LinkedIn, I think Aino Corry, just that link, and I'm on Twitter with my name, @apaipi. I'm also on Instagram, but I never use it. So that's the best place to reach me. And it's really easy to Google me because as with you, we probably have very unique names. Ula Ojiaku: Yes, yes, definitely. Aino Corry: And I have to say, Ula, thank you for that thing from the coaching that you said about pointing out the different parts of the landscape in the journey that people might not have noticed. I think that's a very, very good analogy that I'll use in my retrospective teaching as well. Ula Ojiaku: You're very welcome for that. Thank you for that. Thank you. You're welcome. Any final words before we just wrap this whole thing up? Aino Corry: Yeah, make sure you have something that you enjoy every day in your life. Ula Ojiaku: Amazing. Thanks again Aino.

Muy Buenas a mis MAMADÍSIMOS Como cada Jueves, Nuevo CAP del Podcast. Hoy en la batalla tenemos a Carlos @calistenia_eficiente para hablar de un tema que nunca pensaría que hablaría: LA CALISTENIA Sí, sí, esos flacos, que no están mamadísimos. También Carlos es uno de los fundadores de @bodybygymmastics junto a @pedrovivar_ o @nachogst entre otros. Naah fuera de coñas, la respeto bastante y ver lo que hacen es una pasada. Realmente no hablamos de la calistenia como deporte como tal, si no todo lo que hay o debería haber a su alrededor - Hipertrofia - OCR - Clubbell Nos escuchamos en siguientes CAP WARRIORS A los mandos del Laboratorio Edu Martos Puedes seguirme en Instagram @_workout.lab https://www.instagram.com/_workout.lab/ Boom 💪🧨

Ada seekor anjing yang tidak suka tinggal dirumah. Jadi dia hanya berjalan jalan kemana saja. Ketika tubuhnya sudah mulai tua, ia bermaksud untuk mempunyai rumah dah memasang iklan. Naah ada nggak yaa yang mau dia tinggal dirumahnya

Buuuuuuuuuu... Assutou? Naah? Nhaa. Variações de fantasmas é o que não faltam no cinema! Nesse episódio exploramos alguns dos tipos e suas principais características pela análise tropológica de 5 filmes. Esse é o quinto episódio especial sobre monxtrox. Escuta aí...

Podcasting bareng kawan? Sudah biasa.. Podcasting bareng kakak/abang? Sudah pernah.. Podcasting bareng murid sendiri? Naah ini yang buat beda deg-degannya! Yuk dengerin cerita muridku, Eka namanya.

Diet instan? Masa sih bisa? Perempuan dan diet adalah 2 hal yang erat. Penilain bahwa cantik haruslah cantik, membuat banyak perempuan berlomba² untuk diet. Baik dengan metode-metode yang populer, atau dengan metode mereka sendiri. Ada yang berhasil, tapi tidak jarang juga yang hasilnya yoyo (naik turun) atau bahkan gagal... Naah, kali ini, ngosting ngobrol soal diet, bareng pelaku diet yang berhasil. Dia menerapkan diet dengan metodenya sendiri, dan berhasil!! Dari angka 1xx hingga kini di angka 67-68 dalam 1 tahun. Mau tahu caranya? Yuk simak Ngosting kali ini, bareng Chelin Indra Susmitha. Seorang jurnalis, pecinta kuliner, jalan dan jajan. Happy listening! --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/solopos-fm/message

Come join me as I share my three best tips for maintaining strong friendships in adulthood. I almost went crazy when I had finished working with the audio but could not find it in my PC, luckily it had been saved just was not appearing on my explorer (small size). I had to enlarge it and there it was, " Ah I'm saved, thought I was not going to re-record and people would say I have broken my promise to see them today, " Naah, I have got you my friend, "do not worry about a thing" Fred sang.... "I'll be standing by..." Listen to us on: Spotify Apple Podcast Google Podcast Amazon Music Podcast addicts for web players Don't forget to rate us. Thank you. Email: sababydaddy@gmail.com

In this preview/reviewI talk about Arsenal's 3-0 win over Wimbledon and How important Sunday's game against Spurs is. Let's hope we can beat Spurs Sunday!Twitter: @OfficialelsamoInstagram: @sxmuddxnTikTok: @Officialelsamo

Diet instan? Masa sih bisa? Perempuan dan diet adalah 2 hal yang erat. Penilain bahwa cantik haruslah cantik, membuat banyak perempuan berlomba² untuk diet. Baik dengan metode-metode yang populer, atau dengan metode mereka sendiri. Ada yang berhasil, tapi tidak jarang juga yang hasilnya yoyo (naik turun) atau bahkan gagal... Naah, kali ini, ngosting ngobrol soal diet, bareng pelaku diet yang berhasil. Dia menerapkan diet dengan metodenya sendiri, dan berhasil!! Dari angka 1xx hingga kini di angka 67-68 dalam 1 tahun. Mau tahu caranya? Yuk simak Ngosting kali ini, bareng Chelin Indra Susmitha. Seorang jurnalis, pecinta kuliner, jalan dan jajan. Happy listening! --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/solopos-fm/message

Bismillah...tuh kan jd dibikinin epiaodenya.. Begini, di tradisi jawa biasanya tiap 1 muharram ada yg namanya bubur suro. Naah..bu2r ini punya makna yg baik spt doa2.. utk detailnya dengarin aja ya, santai....sambil manggut2 makan...

We don't need to tell you whats happening outside. Dar Ka Maahaul hai would be an apt phrase to use in this situation. But why such hullabaloo ? Is it because of Farm Laws protests ? Naah !! That's still going on but We have got a new reason to worry about and then make our lives toxic enough. Problem is that you can't escape from it because no matter if you are rich or poor , fark sabko padta hai...Budget se ! Are PSU's really on Sale ? What does that mean ? Apne ko kya milega ? Gone bonkers with such questions ? Fikar not folks !! Our bakchod squad is back with their organic and unfiltered perspective/opinions. This is our honest attempt to make everyone aware of whats going on and how does it impact Indians in general. We aren't bragging that We are budget experts but apni team did more Mehnat in the research and analysis of the Budget2021 than Nirmala Sitharaman #jk. Now you must be wondering Budget wali news got old so why now ? Well Budget came n went par Samjh me aaaya kya..... Bantai ? On this question We all feel the same so lets dive in and find out the andar ki baat with some bakchodi ka tadka sprinkled throughout the episode. Therefore ! Arz kiya hai that Listen to us on Spotify and other podcast apps and follow us and dm us on instagram (Instagram - u2_letstalk) with your doubts , issues and dillemmas so that We get the himmat to bring more episodes without delays and melodrama and just may be a pill to cure your mental lochas . Abhi tak yahi padh rahe ho ! Suno , right now ?

Hai haii sobat Daebak!! Apa kabar? Semoga sehat dan bahagia selalu yaaa. Dan buat teman-teman yang masih UAS semangaatt!! Semoga mendapatkan hasil yang terbaik. Naah akhirnya kita kembali lagii nih, setelah minggu lalu di part 1 dibuat penasaran sama jawaban Kak Yoyok dan Kak Nadia, kira kira apa yaa jawabannya? Biar nggak penasaran, langsung aja yuk kita dengar. Enjoy our podcast sob!!

Haaaaai, jadi 2 minggu ini gw lagi menjalani perawatan dengan obat-obatan dari psikiater. Naah! Di podcast episode ini, gw mau ceritain apa yang gw rasain ketika obat itu bekerja dalam hidup gw selama 2 minggu hehehe Buat kalian yang sedang mengalami gangguan cemas berlebih, depresi dll - ayo kita sehat dan sembuh sama-sama, datang ke psikiater dan psikolog untuk bisa sembuh bersama! Have a nice daaaay!

Siapa yang punya pengalaman di ghosting atau ngeghosting ? biasanya karna apa sih ghosting itu terjadi ? Naah di episode kali ini. Gue dan teman teman gue bercerita tentang pengalaman mereka yang di ghosting atau ngeghosting dan kali ini gue di temani oleh huswa selamat mendengarkan , ENJOY....... --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/teman-santai/message

CORONA (Coffe, Rokok, Makanan) yang pasti bukan Virus apalagi Bir Merk Corona. Naah di episode kali ini, Sarang Kodok Podcast membahas tentang CORONA dalam ruang publik. Kajian ruang publik ini dijelaskan sederhana dalam kebudayaan masyarakat berbudaya di Indonesia yang lekat dengan budaya tongkrongan di Warung Kopi atau kedai kopi. Yukk belajar kajian Ruang Publik Habermas di Sarang Kodok episode berikut. --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/radita/message

Waah, nggak kerasa ya tahun 2020 sudah hampir usai :( Selama pandemi #TemanSharing udah melakukan aktivitas positif dan bermanfaat apa aja nih? Memang betul, pandemi membuat kita terbatas dalam melakukan berbagai macam aktivitas. Ruang gerak kita jadi terbatas, ya nggak sih? Menyebalkan! Eitss, tapi tunggu... Tidak secara langsung kalian sadari kalau aktivitas yang keliatannya 'sepele', yang banyak dilakukan kebanyakan orang ketika masa pandemi ternyata bisa berpotensi menghasilkan cuan lhoo! Hah, apa aja tuh? Naah, langsung aja dengerin #Rekomendasi kali ini yang bahas mengenai 5 Aktivitas Berpotensi Cuan. *kalau urusan sama cuan menarik bukan?* Hahaha! Kalian bisa dengerin langsung di Spotify The Talkative Guy yaa! (tinggal klik link yang ada di bio Instagram The Talkative Guy aja kok repot) Yuk, kasih #Rekomendasi versi kalian melalui kolom komentar / DM di @thetalkative_guy --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/ttg-id/support

Clove's adventure of the new pillow and twisted neck. Sherley's theory of cheating. Without using google! What is the meaning of the word?: cordate [kawr-deyt]Montreal police issued more than $400,000 worth of tickets to anti-mask demonstrators. One of the Midwest's most influential newspapers apologized for what its top editor described as decades of racist coverage of Kansas City, Missouri. The illegal rave scene has spiked in popularity in the UK during the lockdown, with gatherings taking place from rural Wales to London warehouses, to school bathrooms with a 12-Year-Old DJ. On 'Bible Scriptures 90210' Book of Samuel, Chapter 18 - Am I the only one who thinks David is suss right now? With more than 137,000 people in the UK that have received the first dose of the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, we asked the ChoNilla group, who's taking the vaccine? Are you taking the vaccine? Yeah! or Naah! (S1-Ep31)Pass the plate & donate by visiting https://chonillanetwork.com/series/chonilla/ - To connect with us, join the group http://bit.ly/chonillagroup - Have a question? Or show feedback, leave it as a 5 stars review on apple podcasts and we'll read it on the show. Email us at chonillalove@gmail.com

Who made the best tune this year, who is the artist/MC of the year, bar of the year and more. The boys get together for the last time this year and reflect on 2020. They get political and add their few pennies on Trumps defeat in the election, we take about the global situation and what I means for us going forward and much much more.

Inget ga ada kaset jadul yang judul2nya Golden Love Song, Evergreen Hits, Mega Hit Bank, dll dsb dkk? Naah skrg kita dengerin lagi lagu2 yang biasanya muncul di kaset2 kompilasi tersebut... kemooon!!

Rabbi Avraham Kivelevitz has spent the last nine years writing and teaching for Dirshu International'sDaf Yomi B'Halacha,In general,every episode ofFine Tuned Halachadelves into an important Halachic textand extracts important nuggets of direction,history and most importantly,an understanding of how the Jewish legal system developed and continues to guide the lives of a committed people.While the learning tends to align with the seasons we find ourselves in,we are confident it will resonate well beyond the calendar into your consciousness.Please leave us a review or email us at ravkiv@gmail.com See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information. This podcast is powered by JewishPodcasts.org. Start your own podcast today and share your content with the world. Click jewishpodcasts.fm/signup to get started.

Rabbi Avraham Kivelevitz has spent the last nine years writing and teaching for Dirshu International's Daf Yomi B'Halacha,In general,every episode of Fine Tuned Halacha delves into an important Halachic text and extracts important nuggets of direction,history and most importantly,an understanding of how the Jewish legal system developed and continues to guide the lives of a committed people.While the learning tends to align with the seasons we find ourselves in,we are confident it will resonate well beyond the calendar into your consciousness.Please leave us a review or email us at ravkiv@gmail.com See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Welcome back to another week of the OYS podcast. On this episode the boys break down the term "Down Low" The boys also talk about the art of Boycotting.

This week we talk about some Scampy adventures, and about how we cant seem to rest, No matter how hard we try.

Milenials, miris yaa... kalau kita lihat pergaulan sekarang seperti nggak ada malu. Naah.. kenapa itu terjadi? Yuk simak podcast ini

Niih sohib gue, pengalaman nya jadi dokter banyak, udah malang melintang di berbagai pulau. Naah, gimana kisah lengkapnya, yuk dimonggoin ! Semoga menginspirasi ! --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/zonabhawir/support

Handphone bisa jadi adalah barang paling penting buat semua orang. Bahkan lebih penting dari apapun juga...haha, yeee kaan? Dan handphone adalah privacy seseorang. Naah, perlu ngga siy kita berbagi privacy sm pasangan??hhmmm...

Selain menjadi PPDS Objin, Ka Adit juga seorang polisi looohh, keren kan ! Naah disini doi cerita nii, kenapa pilih dokter polisi ketika lulus. Gimana kisah lengkapnya, yuk dimonggoin ! Semoga menginspirasi ! --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/zonabhawir/support

Dedengkot kosmo, bacim. Hobi pus-ap sebelum kuliah makanya ga heran sih sekarang jadi dirut, keren lu cim. Naah buat lisener yang kepo sama doi, yuk dimonggoin. Semoga menginspirasi ! --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/zonabhawir/support

ചോര കണ്ടു ബോധം പോകുന്നത് നിങ്ങളിൽ എത്ര പേർക്കാണ്? ആക്സിഡന്റ് കണ്ടു നില്ക്കാൻ എത്ര പേർക്ക് കേപ്പുണ്ട്. എനിക്കില്ല. എന്റെ ജീവിതത്തിൽ അങ്ങനെ നടന്ന ചില സംഭവങ്ങളാണ് ഇന്ന് ഓർമയിൽ വരുന്നത്. This series is a personal memoir of whatever I can remember now. Trying to get my Malayalam right and it almost gets perfect now. Listen if you can understand Malayalam. Previous Episode Links at anchor.fm/boilandsteam --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/boilandsteam/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/boilandsteam/support

Naah. Non fanno male, in realtà. Cioè, dipende ovviamente. Ma diciamo che non sempre il naturale è per forza meglio. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Di episode kali ini Adam Pratama ngobrol bareng sutradara mini seri "Sementara, Selamanya" yaitu Reza Rahadian. Banyak insight baru yang bisa kita dapatkan soal pendekatan kreatif Reza. Mulai dari visinya dalam menggambarkan jarak dan waktu, penuansaan yang ingin ditunjukkan, tantangan terbesar menjadi sutradara sekaligus pemeran utama, hingga pengakuan Reza akan kelemahan terbesarnya. Naah sambil dengerin obrolan kami, jangan lupa ya guys untuk tonton "Sementara, Selamanya", eksklusif hanya di Vidio(dot)com.

Hmm.. Memang pandemi Covid-19 ini berujung kebosanan yang HQQ! Akhlak jadi lemot, dan kaum rebahan meningkat. Naah... Situasi #dirumah aja ternyata membawa tingkat ke-anehan setiap dari kita justru semakin menjadi-jadi. Apa aja sih EROR 101 yang dialami tim NGOTAK? Cusss dengerin podcast yang satu ini!

Ada banyak pertanyaan seputar pensyariatan shalat Idulfitri di tengah pandemi Covid-19, karena shalat Id yang biasanya dikerjakan di masjid atau lapangan, mendadak harus dilakukan di rumah masing-masing demi mencegah penularan virus corona. Majelis Ulama Indonesia (MUI) pun akhirnya mengeluarkan fatwa tentang panduan shalat Id di tengah pandemi, namun masih saja timbul banyak pertanyaan di benak warganet. Naah, untuk memastikannya, berikut kami tanyakan beberapa pertanyaan seputar panduan shalat Id di tengah pandemi kepada ustadz Muhammad Abduh Tuasikal. Semoga bermanfaat :)

Pada era modern ini, banyak cara yang bisa ditempuh untuk menghasilkan pundi-pundi Rupiah. Lewat berbagai kreativitas dan jiwa entrepreneur, banyak pemuda yang sudah memiliki penghasilannya sendiri. Bahkan mereka sanggup untuk menafkahi seluruh keluarganya meski pada hakikatnya, nafkah mereka masih di bawah tanggung jawab orang tuanya. Naah, apakah para pemuda yang punya penghasilan seperti ini bisa membayar zakatnya sendiri?! Atau masih bolehkah seorang Ayah membayarkan zakat fitrah bagi anaknya yang sudah bekerja? Coba simak percakapan via telepon bersama ustadz Muhammad Abduh Tuasikal dalam audio berikut ini yang membahas masalah tersebut. Semoga bermanfaat :)

Leigh Diffey sits down with F1 McLaren driver Lando Norris to discuss his skill for sim racing, his victory and experience in the IndyCar iRacing Challenge, wanting to race in the real-world Indianapolis 500, expanding his versatility beyond F1 and the aftermath of the iRacing Challenge finale controversy at Indy and his attempts to mend fences with Graham Rahal and Simon Pagenaud and understand what happened.

#Episode9 - “Countries all have borders, LOVE knows none.“ Pasti pernah bermimpi punya pacar orang bule atau beda negara kan? (aku sih pernah pengen punya anak campuran, rasanya gemes banget!) Naah, kalian yang jauh-jauh dari Indo ke Taiwan harusnya kesempatan mendapatkan pacar beda negara lebih tinggi donk! In this episode, @JaneSetiadyy & @Jessicafsw0717 specially invited @WendyChang to share her love experience with abang Taiwan! Banyak sekali cerita-cerita lucu terjadi ketika pacaran, maybe is cultures differences, misunderstanding.... Di akhir episode ini kita juga ada “Fact check” mengenai percintaan dengan orang Taiwan! Kamu yang lagi pacaran/pdkt atau pengen pacaran orang Taiwan, don’t miss out this episode guys! ✌

FRIDAY FEVER PODCAST ALBUM BY DJ SAVAN TRACKLIST : BUZZ, DARU BADNAAM, PAAGAL, ILLEGAL WEAPON, KYA KARTE THE, NAAGIINN, PYAR TENU KARDA, SIP SIP, 3 PEG, NAAH, SHE MOVE IT LIKE, TURN DOWN FOR , NACHAN NU JEE, AAO KABHI, LOCA, GENDA PHOOL, MERE ANGNE MEIN ......... IF YOU LIKE PLS COMMENT AND REVIEW

The Clear Evidence Extract from “My Path to Islam: Australian Muslim Revert Stories” Chapter: “Abu Bakr's Way to Islam” Page: 15-20 Authors: Tuba Boz, Shifa L. Mustapha Publisher: Goodword, 2004 The following is the true account of an Australian revert taken from the honours thesis of Sister Tuba Boz. His name is Abu Bakr, and while his name, like many of those of his fellow-reverts, is chosen for its meaning and its nearness to some aspect of Islam, or that of the life of the Prophet of Arabia, Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him), his story is truly that of an Australian young man with all his Australianism intact. And though he, himself, does not wish to be seen as other than a Muslim, it is, for fellow-Australians, encouragement and living proof of the Qur'anic ayat: Surah 49: 13” O mankind, indeed We have created you from male and female and made you peoples and tribes that you may know one another. Indeed, the most noble of you in the sight of Allah is the most righteous of you. Indeed, Allah is Knowing and Acquainted. “ If one had told Abu Bakr earlier, that he would one day become a Muslim, his reply would most probably have been, “Naah! No way!!!” for like many Australians his perception of Muslims was that they were terrorists. However, there is no accounting for the Mercy and Graciousness of Allah who leads to His Path those whom He wills from all peoples upon the earth; and Abu Bakr was to find this in due course. When asked what had triggered his search to find the true meaning of life, for that was the primary aim of his quest, his response was this: “There were a couple of things. It was the year my parents said they were going to separate. It was not the year they formally divorced, but it was the year my Dad moved out of the house. I went a little off the rails. I (even) had trouble with the police… I was drinking alot.” It may be seen that this was a painful time for this young man. This was to be further compounded, for it was in this year that one of his friends died. Of this event he said: “That led me to think, ‘There's my mate. He just died, and he is only eighteen years old! Is he just worm food?' You know what I mean. That's when I started relating it to my life, thinking, ‘If I died tomorrow what would it matter? What would it matter except to the few who know me among the billions on this Earth?' So I started thinking, ‘No! There has to be more. There has to be more than just this!”' It was with these questions in mind that Abu Bakr commenced his journey, looking to religion for the meaning of existence. He describes his experiences in this way: “First, I mean, logically, I'm an Aussie, so I went straight to Christianity, and I thought I'd have that fish sticker on the back of my car, and “I love Jesus”. I was thinking I'd go buy them and see if they did something for my parking fine!” his waggish sense of humour bubbling to the fore. Then seriously he explains, “Honestly I went through all the (Christian) religions; well not all the religions, but the ones I had access to I investigated. Christianity, including Catholicism, I investigated quite a bit. But the problem was I just couldn't find the answer. While they were all nice, I couldn't sit there and say, “This is the religion for me! ' and ‘This sounds beautiful! '” His search continued: “I looked at Hinduism when I was working in a service station with some Hindu friends... Continue Reading: Video: An Australian Atheist's Journey to Islam - Abu Bakr (English)

Naah, udah mulai berasa kan, kalo makin nambah umur, makin keliatan tuh, mana orang yang kudu ditemenin, mana orang yang kudu ditinggalin. karena makin kesini, makin keliatan tuh orang yang mau temenan sama kita, karena cuma mau cari untung, dan yang mau temenan sama kita karena sincere dari hati bukan karena suatu tujuan yang basi.. 

Hari Minggu kemarin (26 Januari 2020) sudah diumumkan secara resmi satu lagi "superhero universe" yang akan meramaikan perfilman Indonesia, yaitu "Semesta Satria Dewa". Memodernisasi kisah mitologi pewayangan Jawa, Satria Dewa akan memulai "universe"-nya lewat film pertama mereka yaitu "Gatotkaca". Naah gimana pendapat kami soal "Semesta Satria Dewa" dan seberapa besar level antisipasi untuk "Satria Dewa: Gatotkaca" jika melihat dari apa yang sudah dikeluarkan sejauh ini? Dengerin sekarang!

Sering gak denger kata Ta'aruf? Gak asing yah, tapi tau gak arti nya apa, aturan nya gimana, cara nya kaya apa? Naah kebanyakan orang banyak yang belum faham juga nih tentang taaruf, mereka fikir seperti beli kucing dalam karung.. Eh tau-tau nya Zonk! Gak gitu dong... Yuk coba dengerin dulu, kali aja suka *ehhh

this shayari is your story, there is a moment, you have mentioned it in a few words, you may like it.

Tabik pun!!!!! Pernah gak sih kalian ngerasa kesel kalo gak dapet parkiran di mall? Pernah gak lagi jogging tapi di trotoar banyak banget pedagang yang bikin ngiler? Naah tau gak kalo fenomena kaya gitu sebenernya ada ilmunya loh! Cuss dengerin episode pertama dari Podcast Bahas Kota Sama Kita sekaligus kenalan dulu sama kita para pemeran dibalik microphone, ada Vito (yang suaranya kaya anak baru puber), Caca (yang abis putus), sama Haikal (pengejar cinta Caca). Kalau udah tau, jangan lupa berubah ya! #ultraman #gaskeun

Ich war in Düsseldorf bei Serge aka "Kreativ und Frei" und wir haben über die fünf häufigsten Fehler gesprochen, die Fotografen häufig am Anfang machen. All diese Fehler haben wir ebenfalls gemacht und machen manche teilweise heute noch. Fehler gehören zu jeder Entwicklung dazu! Ein kleines Kind was laufen lernt und hinfällt, sagt auch nicht: "Naah, ich glaube Laufen ist nichts für mich." Viel Spaß beim Reinhören ;-) ZUM VIDEO: https://youtu.be/0QXRFV9UHjA # KREATIV & FREI: Musikvideo: https://youtu.be/Kw3H3Fbbktg Homepage: https://kreativundfrei.de Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/kreativundfrei # FOLGE MIR: YOUTUBE http://www.youtube.com/user/Vitografie INSTAGRAM https://www.instagram.com/vitografie/ HOMEPAGE http://www.vitografie.com FACEBOOK https://www.facebook.com/vitografie Ich würde mich über Dein FEEDBACK und eine iTunes Bewertung sehr freuen!

In this episode I give my thoughts on the Elton John biopic, Rocketman. Is Saturday night alright for fighting or should you do the crocodile rock? Is it worth seeing with your tiny dancer or should you say goodbye yellow brick road? Can you tell everybody this is your song? Should I mention the circle of life? Naah that one wasn't in this movie...should I stop naming random Elton John songs? Give listen and find out what I thought! #Adam_Analyzes #IOHO_Sidetracked #IOHO #Rocketman #EltonJohn #Movies #Paramount #Music #Musical #Classic #Rock  --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/inourhonestopinion/support

Akhirnyaaa tiba juga bulan Ramadhan. Bulan yang selalu dinanti-nanti sama umat muslim! Naah di episode kali ini, gue akan cerita-cerita nih sama kalian semua tentang pengalaman seru yang pernah terjadi di sepanjang Ramadhan di hidup gue! Dari mulai serunya puasa jaman bocah, pas puasa kecelakaan sampe pas puasa jadi bidan! Coba dengerin deh! Cocok buat ngabuburit~

Quarter Life Crisis sering banget jadi obrolan podcast orang kebanyakan. Naah gue yang bentar lagi masuk ke usia yang konon Quarter Life juga gamau ketinggalan sama ombak obrolannya nih. Eh iya, episode ini udah ga panjang-panjang amat durasinya. Biar kalian ga kabur hehe

Naah.. Just listen...

EPISODE #170 WRATH OF KAHN TOP 20 TRACKS OF 2018 - MIXED BY DJ BABA KAHN Culture Shock Radio Presents THE FIX Sunday Nights 11pm-2am EST | 4am-7am GMT | 9am - 12pm IST Listen Live on G98.7FM Stream around the world www.g987fm.com  For DJ  Bookings email thebabakahn@gmail.com (weddings, clubs, private events) Please visit www.babakahn.com     **This podcast is dedicated to the Top 20 Tracks as voted by you on The Fix with Baba Kahn. Below is the Official TOP 20 Countdown and all these songs are featured in this mix. **  THE OFFICIAL TOP 20 COUNTDOWN ON THE FIX LISTING   1. Sidhu Moose Wala - Dollar2. Badsha - Tarrefans3  Drake - In my Feelings4. Jasmine Sandlas - Sip Sip5. Mickey Singh - YTL6. YoYo Honey Singh - Dil tu Chori7.  DJ Snake - Taki Taki 8.  Param Singh and Kamal Kahlon - Daru badman9.  Hardy Sandhu -  Naah10. Travis Scott - Sickomode11. Aastha Gill Kamariya12. Yo Yo Honey Singh Choti Choti 13 Gurnam Bhullar - Diamond14 Tyga -Taste15 Diljit Dosanj - Putt Jatt Da16 Veere Di Wedding -No one gives a damn17. Daddy Yankee - Dura18 Hello - Kes19. Zack Lnight Jasmin Walia - Bom Diggy20. Bruno Mars - Finese  

DJ Saquib a.k.a Saquib Wakankar, a awfully talented Mumbai based Music Producer and Composer Started back his carrier in 2015 as a DJ, Now working as Music Producer for well known industry artists. He mainly concentrates on Electronic Sub-Genre “Future Bass” which makes his excellence in it! Recently got his remixes featured on Times Music as well on National Radios and now looking forward for new opportunities along with some International Labels. Being a viral sensation for LoFi remixes on Spotify reaching milestone of 1 lakh streamers. He had also collaborated with many of the Talented Musicians of Industry named AKD, DJ Syrah, DJ Dackton, Dropboy and many more. Other than this, He says his inspiration among the artists are; Zedd, The Chainsmokers, R3hab.

A Mini Mashup of some of the Big names in the Bhangra scene right now including Jasmine Sandals, Garry Sandhu, Sunanda Sharma, Sidhu Moose Wala, Diljit Dosanjh, Hardy Sandhu, Guru Randhawa and Rajvir Jawanda. - TRACK LIST: Illegal Weapons, Jaani Teri Naa, Issa Jatt, Do You Know, Naah, High Rated Gabru, Kangani and Uchiyan Gallan

One again, we bless you with some great music from the Rappers I Know catalog, along with a discussion about thieves in the temple! This week's playlist: Jett I Masstyr - "Survival Of The Fittest" (Featuring Brew, Kashmere Don, and Damien) The Hue - "Fiyah Flies" (Featuring Chris Dave and Derrick Hodge) Scanz - "Crown Me" (Featuring MosEL) Ethos (Legendary KO + Kashmere Don) - "Naah" (Produced by Big Mon) Tiny Hearts - "Snow Cold" Eimaral Sol - "Royal" (Produced by Analogue Escape) Damien - "Once And The Future" (Produced by E Classic) Black Milk / Danny Brown - "Black and Brown" The Legendary KO - "The Science Pt. 1" (Featuring Kashmere Don and The Niyat) Follow us on Twitter / Instagram / Facebook: @fromhouwithlove www.rappersiknow.com www.illmanneredmedia.com www.allrealradio.com

"Det är klart det kommer bli så jävla sjukt att se truppen gå in på Tele2, det är Allsvenskan, och vi kan titta på varandra och bara... nu är vi här".  Blåsvarta Baksmällan firar in den största säsongen i IK Sirius historia (i alla fall sedan 1974) med ett riktigt mastodontavsnitt. Fem stycken allsvenska tips tragglas igenom innan alla lag synas i sömmarna med hjälp av kvällstidningarnas biblar. Sist men inte minst snackas den allsvenska premiären mot Djurgården, och hela säsongen, upp. Dessutom: Henningssons mäklaraura, AFC Support, Örebro-hatet mot Sirius, Janne Jönssons japanska, Divine? Naah, hur man gör isterband och supporter- och spelarförhoppningar. Medverkande: Axel Vinter Persson, Johann Bernövall, Lars Olsson, Oskar Bernövall, Tommy Tornberg. patreon.com/bsbaksmallan  

Today's Guest: Robert Schimmel, comedian, author, Cancer on Five Dollars a Day (chemo not included): How Humor Got Me Through the Toughest Journey of My Life Order from Amazon.com by clicking the book cover above (APRIL 2008) I tried my hand at stand-up comedy twice in college, once as a freshman at the University of Miami and again a year later at the University of Florida. And no, I wasn’t so bad at Miami that I was asked to leave. They were a lot more subtle than that. Anyway, I gave up that dream early. It’s a tough, humiliating life, not for me. Now, Robert Schimmel, on the other hand, is one of the best stand-up comedians of his generation. He, like Richard Belzer before him, is the guy other comedians watch and measure themselves against. He is naturally funny and naturally crude, rude, and not recommended for listeners under the age of 18. That’s my way of saying if you’re too young to drink or if you’re easily offended, tune out now. The button-down mind of Bob Newhart this definitely is not. These days, Schimmel is still out doing his job making people laugh, but there is a twist. In 2000, when his career was reaching new heights, he was diagnosed with Stage III non-Hodgkins Lymphoma, cancer. Not good. But he underwent aggressive therapy and routed the disease, even discovering a new source of material for his act in process. And he’s written a book, Cancer on $5 a Day: Chemo Not Included, How Humor Got Me Through the Toughest Journey of My Life. ROBERT SCHIMMEL audio excerpt: "I did find humor in it. When you’re in the hospital and you lose all your hair and everything, and your doctor comes in and says, “Would you be interested in a wig?” And he has like an 8 x 10 like a binder, a notebook with different headshots with wigs on them. I said to the guy, “Do you have one for my crotch?” And the guy says, “As a matter of fact, we do,” and he showed me pictures. I almost fell out of the bed. And he said, “Robert, they’re virtually undetectable,” and I’m thinking, Undetectable? I don’t have one eyelash, and then I’m gonna have a shrub between my legs, and that’s not gonna be detectable?"  BOB ANDELMAN/Mr. MEDIA: Robert, I’m kind of curious. You’ve written your first book. What was it like to see your material in such a permanent format? You’ve done CDs, and, subject matter aside for the moment, it’s Robert Schimmel’s voice on paper. What was that like for you? ROBERT SCHIMMEL: It was hard. I never had any intention of writing a book before because I have friends that are comedians that have books out and basically what their book is is it’s like their stand-up act that’s been transcribed and put into a book. And I never wanted to do anything like that because I know that there are some jokes that you can tell live on stage, and maybe it’s your delivery or your timing, your personality where all those things play into the way the joke works, and you look at it on a piece of paper, and it’s not the same thing. I used to write for “In Living Color.” There were sketches that you’d write that you knew were funny, but other people read them on a sheet of paper, and they go, “Naah, we’ve got to punch it up a little bit,” and it was perfect the way it was the first time. Robert Schimmel: Life Since Then. Order your copy today by clicking on the DVD cover above! I had somebody help me write this book. I’m not gonna deny that because I respect writers, and they usually don’t get any credit for when they help somebody else, but I have a picture of the guy in the inside flap of the book. His name is Alan Eisenstock, and the reason why I chose to have him help me was twofold. One, he interviewed me in 2000 when I was on top of the world career-wise for a Father’s Day issue of Variety magazine, and as we spoke, it wound up us getting kind of close, and he found out that I’d lost a son in 1992, and I found out that he lost a son. So when they offered me the book this year, I wanted to find someone that could help me because I knew that I wanted to have somebody else that shared that same experience as I did because they could help me express myself and maybe in some words that might not be in my vocabulary or a way to say it that I don’t. I also wanted someone that didn’t go through cancer the way I did because I wanted them not to be in my shoes for that because then he could be a good judge. I can talk about what I went through and some of the procedures and tests and all these other things, and to me, it’s like I might as well be reading a menu to you, but I talk to other people, and a lot of people get overwhelmed and they’re like, “Whoa, whoa, whoa, don’t tell me anymore!” So I needed someone to say, “You know what? You’re getting too heavy here, and you kind of said this in this other thing.” He helped guide me into putting it in order and making sure that the book was still light-hearted. That’s why I chose the title, Cancer on $5 a Day: Chemo Not Included, because I wanted people to know right up front that I’m not Deepak Chopra or Dr. Phil and that I am a comedian. This is about cancer, but there are light-hearted moments in it. The only other choice I had for a title…They wanted something like My Unplanned Journey, which that’s not me, but the other title was When Bad Things Happen to Seemingly Good People, but I like Cancer on $5 a Day. I think that that grabs you, and you look at it, and I’m very proud of it. I really am. First of all, it’s dedicated to my son, and I’d been waiting ever since that happened to find something that I can dedicate to him and leave that mark even after I’m not here anymore. And if people read this or someone reads it, and I know that people have heard my story before cause I talk about it on stage, if it gives somebody hope or inspiration or go wow, he’s seven years out from what he had, and I just started treatment now, I can do it, then what I went through wasn’t for nothing. I get to do what I love doing the most, which is make people laugh and entertain them and maybe touch them in a way that can help change their lives for the better, and I do believe that laughter is very healing, not only for the people laughing but for the people on the receiving end of the laughter, too. ANDELMAN: I have to say, as a guy who makes his living co-authoring books, that it was very nice, not only to hear just a minute ago you give Alan Eisenstock credit for helping you with this, but he actually wrote the introduction to the book, which was very touching in and of itself. It’s very unusual that way. SCHIMMEL: Yeah. I know he’s written other books for a couple other comedians he’s worked with where he told me that those guys never mention his name, that he’s gone to book signings with them where they don’t even acknowledge he’s in the room, and I just can’t do that. Maybe it’s because of what I went through versus somebody else where they’re just a comic, and they have a book out for something. I admire what he did, and I respect him, and he deserves the credit for what he did. I can’t lie and tell people that I did it all by myself cause it’s not true, and I just wouldn’t do it. And I mention him on the radio. I did now. Every interview I do, I bring his name up. I don’t see what’s wrong with it, and I can understand why writers would want to strike, and when they don’t get the credit that’s due to them because this guy basically had to go back into his own feelings about losing his child. We sat together for days and days and days. Every week, we got together like 3, 4 days a week at Taverna Tony, this Greek restaurant that’s in Malibu, and it’s like halfway between where he lives and I live. There were days that we were laughing. There were days when we were crying where we just had to stop, and we said we couldn’t do anymore that day because he started talking about things about his son, I would talk about mine, and then that was just it. And we knew that we weren’t going to get anything done that was going to be able to get on paper that day. So for him to do that, to me, that’s not just sitting down and writing a book with someone or transcribing or re-writing. He emotionally took that roller-coaster ride with me, and it’s a tough ride to take. It really is. I didn’t want to write about my son in the book, and I’ll tell you why. It’s so bizarre. I only want to have a positive effect on people with this book, not negative, and the fact that my son lost his battle, I didn’t want to put that in anybody’s head. I very rarely talk about my son in my act onstage unless it’s a fundraiser for a pediatric oncology thing. Otherwise, I don’t. I don’t want to use what happened to Derek… I don’t want to exploit what my son went through to elicit a certain response from the audience because honestly, I told Alan, “We both have the ultimate trump card. I could go onstage and bomb, and people can come over or the owner and say, ‘You really stunk,’ and I could say, ‘Yeah, yesterday was my son’s birthday and he would’ve been...’ That’s all you gotta say, and you’re off the hook right there, and I just won’t do it.” There are people that don’t make it. I want to be realistic also, but life is still beautiful no matter what. My life is as precious as his was, and I have other children, and I just didn’t want them to feel like second-class citizens to him. What would they have to do? Get really sick before they get the attention he got? And I did find humor in it. When you’re in the hospital and you lose all your hair and everything, and your doctor comes in and says, “Would you be interested in a wig?” And he has like an 8 x 10 like a binder, a notebook with different headshots with wigs on them. I said to the guy, “Do you have one for my crotch?” And the guy says, “As a matter of fact, we do,” and he showed me pictures. I almost fell out of the bed. And he said, “Robert, they’re virtually undetectable,” and I’m thinking, Undetectable? I don’t have one eyelash, and then I’m gonna have a shrub between m