Podcasts about small modular reactors

In un'epoca di trasformazione digitale capillare, gli stadi sportivi si stanno trasformando da semplici infrastrutture per ospitare spettatori a ecosistemi tecnologici. Con l'inizio dei Mondiali di Calcio 2026, il mondo dello sport professionistico ha attivato simultaneamente un vasto ecosistema di innovazioni mai implementato prima: palloni intelligenti dotati di sensori, sistemi di rilevamento ottico del fuorigioco semi-automatico, intelligenza artificiale per l'analisi tattica e infrastrutture digitali che permettono di riconfigurare gli spazi in tempo reale. Ma come si sono evoluti gli stadi più famosi del mondo? E quali sono le sfide tecnologiche e strutturali affrontate dai club europei e americani per modernizzare impianti storici densamente inseriti in contesti urbani? In questa puntata proviamo a capirlo.Nella sezione delle notizie parliamo di un nuovo passo verso il nucleare in Italia grazie agli Small Modular Reactors, della città costruita dall'FBI per simulare attacchi informatici e infine delle icone europee per marcare i contenuti generati dall'intelligenza artificiale.--Indice--00:00 - Introduzione00:56 - Un nuovo passo verso il nucleare in Italia (IlPost.it, Matteo Gallo)02:19 - La finta città dell'FBI per le indagini informatiche (TheVerge.com, Davide Fasoli)03:33 - L'UE spiega come marcare i contenuti IA (DDay.it, Luca Martinelli)05:32 - L'evoluzione tecnologica degli stadi sportivi (Matteo Gallo)18:43 - Conclusione--Testo--Leggi la trascrizione: https://www.dentrolatecnologia.it/S8E25#testo--Contatti--• www.dentrolatecnologia.it• Instagram (@dentrolatecnologia)• Telegram (@dentrolatecnologia)• YouTube (@dentrolatecnologia)• redazione@dentrolatecnologia.it--Brani--• Ecstasy by Rabbit Theft• Never Give Up by Steve Hartz

Stay informed on current events, visit www.NaturalNews.com  - Nvidia's AI-Empowered Laptops and Privacy Concerns (0:10) - Nvidia's New Chip and Its Implications (7:07) - Microsoft's Recall Feature and Privacy Concerns (13:41) - Linux as a Safe Alternative (20:05) - The Bubble in the Semiconductor Market (26:34) - Nvidia's Role in the Surveillance State (33:11) - The AI Backlash and Its Implications (40:01) - The Depopulation Agenda and AI's Role (46:45) - The Role of Gold and Silver in a Crash (53:12) - The Importance of Breaking Spells (1:00:19) - Breaking Spells and AI Concerns (1:06:38) - Fourth Industrial Revolution and AI Military Value (1:13:08) - Introduction of Zach Voorhees and AI Concerns (1:19:03) - Government Lawfare and Open Source Repositories (1:25:35) - Taxation and Regulation of AI Services (1:31:43) - Cognitive Control and AI Programming (1:37:39) - Data Centers and Energy Infrastructure (1:43:35) - Small Modular Reactors and Energy Solutions (1:49:51) - The Fourth Industrial Revolution and Human Impact (1:55:55) - Education and Parenting in the AI Age (2:02:02) - The Zach Adams Effect and Local AI (2:07:56) - Qigong Dong Discussion and Physical Fitness (2:14:07) - Transition to Zach Voorhees and UNA (2:20:29) - Promotion of Recommended Partners and Ancient Computing Technology (2:27:58) - Final Remarks and Health Ranger Store Promotion (2:35:35) Watch more independent videos at http://www.brighteon.com/channel/hrreport  ▶️ Support our mission by shopping at the Health Ranger Store - https://www.healthrangerstore.com ▶️ Check out exclusive deals and special offers at https://rangerdeals.com ▶️ Sign up for our newsletter to stay informed: https://www.naturalnews.com/Readerregistration.html Watch more exclusive videos here:

Tschechien plant Europas erstes Mini-AKW auf dem Kontinent. Start-ups werben in Frankreich für den Bau von Small Modular Reactors. In einigen EU-Staaten erlebt die Atomkraft ein politisches Comeback. Doch wie realistisch sind die Projekte wirklich? Marianne Allweiss, Suzanne Krause, Katja Bigalke www.deutschlandfunkkultur.de, Weltzeit

Wenn das so weitergeht mit der KI-Entwicklung, dann wird in nahezu jedem Geschäftsmodell ein AI-Modell stecken - und damit auch Kosten für die Token. Sie sind die kleinste Einheit und Berechnungsbasis für alles, was LLMs heute und künftig leisten, und werden voraussichtlich mitbestimmen, was künftig wie viel kosten wird - sei es die Überarbeitung eines Buches oder der Handgriff eines Roboters.In der neuen Folge von "Wasner + Steinschaden" sprechen Jakob Steinschaden, Mitgründer von newsrooms und Trending Topics, und Clemens Wasner, CEO von EnliteAI und Vorsitzender von AI Austria, über folgende Themen:

Send us Fan MailWhat if you could ship a nuclear power plant like a container - and run it for years without refueling?Josef Freundorfer is the CEO of Nuclea Energy ( https://www.nuclea.energy/ ), where he is leading the development of next-generation nuclear microreactors designed to bring reliable, zero-carbon power to some of the world's most challenging environments.An engineer by training, Josef brings hands-on experience across reactor design, fuel handling, and nuclear operations - having worked at Bruce Power and Candu Energy - combined with a strategic perspective shaped by his role as founder and president of Nuclear Potential Canada, where he has been an active voice in advancing nuclear innovation and public understanding.At Nuclea, Josef is spearheading the development of the Morpheus Reactor - a lead-cooled, graphite-moderated microreactor platform aimed at powering remote communities, mining operations, defense installations, and energy-intensive infrastructure like data centers.With a growing patent portfolio in nuclear plant design and a career spanning engineering, policy advocacy, and entrepreneurship, Josef sits at the intersection of technology, regulation, and market deployment - working to redefine how nuclear energy is built, deployed, and scaled in the 21st century.#nuclearenergy #microreactors #smallmodularreactors #SMR #advancednuclear #cleanenergy #energytransition #nuclearpower #HALEU #nextgenerationenergy #energydisruption #climatetech #deepphysics #energysecurity #AIinfrastructure #datacenters #miningenergy #offgridpower #leadcooledreactor #nuclearinnovation #canadanuclear #futureenergySupport the show

This show has been flagged as Clean by the host. -------------------- 01 Introduction This is a follow up to my 8 part series on nuclear power. In this episode I will answer questions posed by listeners in the comments to the series. I would like to start by thanking these people for taking the time to submit interesting questions. -------------------- Costs of Small Versus Large Reactors 02 brian-in-ohio asked two questions The first was for a cost comparison between large and small reactors. The second was for nuclear plant safety compared to conventional power plants. 03 Answer I think that any answer to the second question is going to be perceived by some people as politically controversial, so it's probably not a good topic for HPR to address. 04 The first question though about cost of small versus large reactors is an interesting one, although not one that is easy to give an answer to. I will restrict the answer to just grid scale electric power production and ignore use cases such as industrial process heat or power for remote mines and communities. 05 This question comes down to economies of scale versus economies of replication. Economies of scale centre around increased efficiencies of use of materials and labour when making something bigger. For example, the amount of steel used by a pipe increases linearly with its diameter, but the amount of fluid that it transports increases with the square. 06 Economies of replication come from increasing efficiencies which result from serial production. As you repeat the same design over and over again, you learn how to do things better and make fewer mistakes. 07 The exact same principles apply to shipbuilding. Indeed, a lot of the inspiration for Small Modular Reactors comes from the shipbuilding industry. If you build a series of identical ships, then each subsequent ship will cost less and be built faster. There are of course diminishing returns to this process, so the improvements are less with each additional unit and after a sufficient number of units the cost and time reductions level off. 08 However, this doesn't discount the benefits of economies of scale. What it does mean is that there are two ways of approaching the problem, and which way works in any given scenario depends on such conditions as how big the local electricity market is how fast the demand for electricity is growing, the ownership and financing structure of the electricity market, and the geography of the area, which may pose limits on the number of sites. 09 According to the finance people who have crunched the numbers, there are two sizes of reactor which make the most sense in the above context. These are 300 MW and 1000 MW. However, take those as very rough numbers rather than immutable laws of nature and other sizes may work as well. 10 The key point is that there are cases to be made for both small and large reactors, with the large reactor being several times the size of the small one. 11 An additional factor is that building only one reactor does not reap the benefits of efficiency of replication. You need to build a series of them on the same site. So if you are building a power plant, you don't build a power plant that has just one reactor unless you are in a small market which can only use that much power. Instead, you should build between 4 and 6 reactors in sequence next to one another. 12 If you are supply a large population with a growing demand for electricity, then 4 or 6 large 1000 MW reactors gains both economies of scale and economies of replication. If you are supplying a smaller population with slow growth in demand for electricity, then 4 or 6 300 MW reactors at least gets you economies of replication. 13 There is what could be viewed as an interesting example in terms of the above taking place just east of Toronto. There they are building four 300 MW SMRs on a site next to an existing nuclear power plant. 14 Here are the cost estimates from the Government of Ontario. All costs are in Canadian dollars. Unit 1 is $6.1 billion, plus $1.6 billion in costs which are shared by all four unit.s Unit 2 is $4.9 billion. Unit 3 is $4.2 billion. Unit 4 is $4.1 billion. 15 As you can see, building a series of reactors sequentially on the same site results in declining overall costs. They are very confident in these costs as they used data from a series of major nuclear power plant refurbishment projects in Ontario which have been coming in on time and on budget. 16 Construction began last year and the plant is expected to have a 65 year operating life. 17 However, the province of Ontario also has plans for expansion of electrical generation by about 15,000 MW by 2050 in order to meet net zero targets. 18 Given the heavy concentration of population in the Toronto region, and the very high cost and difficulty of building long distance transmission lines, and the limited number of sites which could host new power generation facilities of any sort, I suspect it is quite likely that subsequent reactors will be large 1,000 MW ones rather than SMRs. 19 The Wesleyville site (which is further east of Toronto) is tentatively scheduled for a 10,000 MW nuclear power plant. That would seem to make ten 1,000 MW reactors more likely than 34 300 MW reactors. 20 I don't have a comparable set of numbers for building large reactors to give an exact apples to apples comparison of costs. Different countries use different accounting and financing systems, and finance makes a huge difference to overall costs for nuclear power as operating costs are a relatively small share of the total. 21 Now to look at another side of this equation, the provinces of Saskatchewan and New Brunswick wish to replace their coal fired power plants with nuclear power plants. The populations of these provinces are too small to absorb a large new power plant into their grids, and studies assuming large reactors have foundered on this issue. 22 New Brunswick already have a nuclear power plant, but it was build in the days when reactors were much smaller. Both provinces however are very interested in small reactors, even individual ones, in order to replace the coal fired plants that are of similar size. 23 I think this covers the cost versus size issue. The more I look into it, the more it becomes apparent that there is no simple one size fits all answer but rather there are a series of trade-offs which must be taken in light of local circumstances. -------------------- MOX Fuel in the USA 24 The next question comes from mnw who asked about the use of MOX fuel in the USA. 25 mnw asked I am enjoying and look forward to the rest of the series. Do you think the US will ever wake up and start recycling its spent fuel? It seems like such a huge waste just to try and keep a small amount of fuel away from"the bad guys" or whatever they are imagining. Answer 26 My answer to this is as follows. I think I've addressed this in the original series, although not directly with respect to the US so I can provide some more detail on that aspect of it. 27 First though I will review what plutonium-uranium mixed oxide (MOX) fuel is. As mentioned in previous episodes, military grade plutonium is not the same as the plutonium which comes out of commercial power reactors. Just as military grade uranium requires nearly pure U-235 isotope, military grade plutonium requires nearly pure Pu-239 isotope. 28 What comes out of a commercial power reactor as spent fuel is not usable for weapons purposes as the proportion of Pu-239 is much too low. However, plutonium recovered from spent fuel can be used as fuel for nuclear reactors in place of uranium 235 when mixed with uranium 238 either left over from enrichment or extracted from spent fuel. This is what is known as MOX fuel. 29 To look at the US history of this however, here's the sequence of events. The US banned fuel reprocessing in 1976. However, this ban was repealed in 1981. 30 In 2005, the US began building a mixed-oxide (MOX) fuel plant at Savannah River in the state of South Carolina. However, this plant was not intended as a normal commercial operation and it was not intended to recycle commercial nuclear power plant fuel. It was instead intended to convert surplus military grade plutonium into commercial fuel in order to get rid of it as part of an arms control program. 31 The program was suspended in 2018. There were apparently many complex political issues involved in these on-again off-again decisions and I won't pretend to have the time or interest to explore all the details nor do I think most listeners would be interested in hearing abou them. 32 As of March 2026, the US are looking at reviving part of the Savannah River plant to produce limited amounts of fuel for testing of advanced reactors. The issue driving this is the shortage of uranium enriched to just below 20%. This fuel is used in certain types of small SMR. 33 The main commercial supplier of this material was a plant in Russia, but "certain events in Europe in recent years" shall we say, have resulted in that supply no longer being available to commercial operations in the US. MOX fuel based on surplus weapons grade plutonium is intended as a short term quick fix for that problem. 34 Another driving force is legal requirements following from domestic commitments for the US government to dispose of certain stockpiles of weapons grade plutonium from certain sites in the US where it is "temporarily" stored, and the solution to that is seen as burning it up in power reactors. 35 So the history is the US banned fuel reprocessing. Then a few years later they un-banned it. Then the US government started building a MOX plant which was intended to get rid of surplus weapons grade material by burning it up in power reactors. Then they decided they didn't want to do that. Then they decided they may want to make MOX fuel after all to replace supplies of special grades of fuel for experimental or prototype reactors. 36 What is missing from the above history is any actual interest from the US commercial nuclear industry in MOX fuel. The reason for this is, as mentioned in the previous episodes, uranium is so cheap and abundant that fuel made from fresh uranium is cheaper than MOX fuel. 37 Some countries such as France wish to recycle spent fuel to reduce their dependence upon imports. Recall that France's drive to build nuclear power plants was in response to the 1970s era energy crisis when oil imports from the Middle East were suddenly cut off. However, the US are not concerned about this issue and so do not make it national security policy as France did. 38 As a result, US commercial demand is for cheaper fuel made from fresh uranium rather than for MOX fuel. Until such time as fresh uranium greatly increases in price there is little economic incentive for the use of MOX fuel in the US. 39 However, there is another aspect to this. If you recall in previous episodes I described molten salt reactors which used dissolved uranium fuel. These reactors inherently reprocess fuel as part of their normal operation. They just do it as part of maintaining the molten salt chemistry at the correct values rather than doing it as a separate process. 40 If these types of reactors become widely used then they would be achieving the same thing as creating MOX fuel, but without an explicit separate step. 41 As a final footnote to the above, the US has almost exclusively use enriched uranium light water reactors. As mentioned in previous episodes, there are ways of recycling spent fuel from light water reactors which do not involve chemically reprocessing it to make MOX fuel. 42 Experiments have been done involving South Korea, China, and Canada which take spent fuel from light water reactors and repackage it to fit it into natural uranium heavy water reactors. What is used up or "spent" fuel for a light water reactor is high grade fuel to a natural uranium reactor. However, the US has, for whatever reason, never built commercial natural uranium reactors such as are used in a number of other countries around the world. 43 If they were to do so, then nuclear fuel could be used twice, once in a light water reactor, and again in a natural uranium reactor, all without having to turn it into MOX fuel in a separate reprocessing step. However, this particular alternative would likely face the same issue in the sense that fresh fuel would still be cheaper than reusing spent fuel. -------------------- A Variety of Questions from Clinton 44 Next we have a variety of questions from Clinton. Clinton asked I would like some commentary in the current situation, why has hinkley gone off the rails, the new american approach, the odd things done after fukushima, the new radiation rules in the states. 45 Question 1 why has hinkley gone off the rails, 46 Answer The question refers to cost overruns at the Hinkley Point nuclear power project in the UK. The UK government looked into this issue in a more general sense in 2025. They published a report on it titled Nuclear Regulatory Review 2025 Enabling nuclear delivery through regulatory reform John Fingleton There is a link to the report in the show notes. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/692080f75c394e481336ab89/nuclear-regulatory-review-2025.pdf 47 As the report is 162 pages long, I won't try to cover it all in this answer. I will however give a few simple examples. The report focuses on civilian nuclear power and the defence nuclear industry as well. However it also draws examples from outside the nuclear industry to show that the problem is not limited to nuclear. It shows that the same problems exist in the offshore wind industry, and in the HS2 High Speed Rail project. 48 In the view of the authors of the report, the essence of the problem seems to be a lack of any degree of proportionality in terms of mitigating negative effects from any project. Big nuclear projects make the headlines because they are inherently big projects, but as I have just mentioned, they affect things like wind power development and rail transport as well. 49 I will pick one example from Hinkley Point specifically. This is "Case Study: Hinkley Point C Fish Protection" A summary of this is that they spent £700 million of additional money on the cooling water intakes to protect an estimated 0.083 salmon per year, along with 0.028 sea trout, 6 river lamprey, 18 Allis shad, and somewhere between 100 and 528 twaite shad. The report points out that there are ways to protect far more fish for far less money by spending it in other areas, and gives some examples. Again, this problem is not limited to nuclear power, and they give similar examples connected with offshore wind development and HS2 High Speed Rail. 50 I would like to emphasize that I am not expressing an opinion on whether or not any of these decisions were good or bad ones or whether the money was well spent. I am just summarizing the report's explanation of why large projects of all sorts initiated and approved by the UK parliament were not turning out as initially expected. I will leave it up to people in the UK to decide whether or not they are satisfied with the current situation. 51 Question 2 the new american approach, 52 Answer The US have apparently announced changes to their regulatory system. I don't know enough about the subject to really judge the practical effects of regulation within the US. However, I have read and listened to many interviews of people from both the industry and the regulatory side of things who are from outside the US but are familiar with it. They generally contrast two different approaches to regulation. On the one hand there is the US approach, which they see as being more of a box ticking exercise than an in depth safety review. This makes it very hard to get a design other than a traditional PWR or BWR approved in the US. 53 It has the advantage from the regulator side of things though in that it reduces the amount of work required as it primarily requires just following a set of defined procedures. These people then contrast that approach with the one used in the UK and in Canada, both of which they see as being very similar to one another. In those two countries, regulators work with industry to review designs from basic principles rather than just seeing if it meets a pre-defined list of criteria. This is a results oriented system rather than a process oriented system as used in the US. 54 As a result of this, designers of new nuclear reactors are going to the UK and Canada first to go through preliminary review there, and only going to the US later. What designers are looking for is feedback on their design as they go along in order to align the design with what safety regulators see as being required from their standpoint. They want to go into a review process before the design is finalized so they can get guidance on how they should approach things rather than trying to add safety as additional features on top of a finished design. 55 It would take someone with deep familiarity with nuclear regulation systems to understand the practical effects of recent changes in US regulatory systems, but it is quite possible that people within the regulatory structure in the US have been taking the above on board and trying to adapt to current circumstances. However, I can only speculate on that. This is about the best answer that I can give. 56 Question 3 the odd things done after fukushima, 57 Answer This covers a lot of topics, some of which are probably political and so are not suited to HPR. I will try to list a few events however. As a brief summary if the Fukushima events go however, a historic scale earthquake and tsunami in Japan in 2011 caused huge loss of life and widespread damage. About 20,000 people were killed by the earthquake and tsunami. Three nuclear reactors based on 1960s era GE BWR designs were seriously damaged by hydrogen explosions caused by loss of power to backup generators when they were flooded by the tsunami. However, there were no radiation related deaths or cases of radiation sickness. 58 Following events in Japan was a general review of designs around the world, with various improvements made in some areas, particularly backup generators and hydrogen management. It seems to be conventional wisdom that the Fukushima event caused a number of countries to decide to phase out nuclear power. 59 However, when I tried to make a list of such countries for this episode I found things were not as is often heard. The countries which decided to get rid of nuclear power had largely started down that road at least a decade before then and generally for reasons unrelated to any specific events outside of their own country. In other cases they reversed that decision or are in the process of doing so. Japan itself has restarted many of their nuclear power plants and plant to replace decommissioned nuclear power plants with new ones, although many of the older and smaller ones were considered not economically worth upgrading at this point in their life to restart them. 60 The one possible exception to this may be Taiwan which decided to phase out nuclear power in 2016. However, I don't know enough about Taiwanese politics to state with any confidence that their decision in 2016 was based on anything related to events in Japan, or whether in fact they were a byproduct of other political changes within Taiwan and the shut down of nuclear plants happened to be carried along with those. Currently Taiwan get their electricity primarily from natural gas and coal. 61 Meanwhile across mainland Asia from Turkey to China, large numbers of nuclear power plants were built or are under construction. Taken together on a global scale, did anything really change after Fukushima, or did the countries which had already decided to close down their nuclear power plants simply continue to do so, and those countries who decided they wanted more of them continue to build them? That's a good question for which I don't think anyone has the perspective to answer at this point. 62 Another side of this which is hard to disentangle from it though is the increased use of natural gas for electric power generation which was happening at around the same time. Increased use of fracking in a number of countries, plus increased supplies from Russia and LNG from the Middle East and other places resulted in falls in natural gas prices in many places. Since combined cycle natural gas turbines form the main competitor to nuclear power, anything which improves the economics of natural gas will act to reduce demand for nuclear power. This makes it hard to decide to what degree the reduction in the number of reactors being built was due to the political effects of the earthquake and tsunami and to what degree it was due to cheaper natural gas through fracking and other means. I'll leave that question at that. 63 Question 4 the new radiation rules in the states. 64 Answer I'm not deeply familiar with US radiation rules, but I will attempt to answer the question. Apparently there are wide variety of different things being addressed, only some of which have any relevance to the nuclear power industry. One of these is an epidemiological study on the current exposure limits for workers in the nuclear industry. This study will take place over about 5 years. In the end it may not result in any changes. This is for a number of reasons. 65 One is that US exposure thresholds for workers are currently aligned with international standards. It would be difficult for the US industry to operate on a different basis than the rest of the world when supply chains are global and kit is designed to meet currently recognized standards. Another is that apparently the nuclear industry are not, so far as I can discern, asking for any changes to limits. They instead are looking for changes to how some of the details are being applied, such as for example the criteria for deciding when respirators are required in low risk environments. 66 Some point to recent changes in UK regulations as an example of what they are looking for. I will post a link to the new (November of 2025) UK regulations in the show notes. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/nuclear-industry-principles-to-guide-the-application-of-as-low-as-reasonably-practicable-alarp-and-best-available-techniques-bat/ways-of-working-principles-to-guide-the-application-of-alarp-and-bat-in-the-nuclear-industry-accessible-webpage This is about as much detail as I think I can comment on when it comes to this question, as I think it is a subject that requires a fair bit more practical knowledge of than I have in order to give a thorough and balanced answer. -------------------- 67 Question from Antoine Were/are the designs patented? Hi, Whiskeyjack. Nice ep. You said AGR, based on Magnox, was a nuclear reactor type that did not sell well outside the UK. I then started thinking if it were (is) possible to another countries to develop by themselves based on that project, or if it had (has) a commercial restriction for exploration of the technology. I have yet to listen to the following episodes (doing little by little) and may learn better on the choices, but I felt free to present the question by now... Thanks! 68 Answer This is a very good question because it offers the opportunity to talk about a number of interesting things that haven't been touched on yet. Let's cover a bit of background first. 69 A patent is a time limited right to exploit a defined bit of valuable technical knowledge. Patents were involved from the very earliest days of commercial nuclear power, and I will give an example of this later. A key point to keep in mind though is that the nuclear power field moves very slowly and it takes a long time for new knowledge to make it from the lab to commercial application. Patents will often expire before they reach the point where they can be used. 70 Contracts on the other hand are legally enforceable agreements between two parties. A contract may have a time limited life, but that is an arrangement between the parties. A commercial nuclear power plant is a very large and complex bit of kit and not easily copied in detail. It can be far more effective to cover designs under contracts and licenses than to rely on patents. If a country wished to build their own nuclear power plants rather than buying them from someone else, there are a large number of companies who have commercial designs they are willing to license to third parties for them to build themselves. Indeed a number of these companies base their business around licensing of designs or have other reasons for wishing to do so. 71 From a licensee perspective, it could take decades of work and hundreds of millions or even billions of dollars to take a design from first principle to the ready to build state, wheras licensing a design give you a proven design right away. As mentioned in previous episodes, there many types of reactor in the world. The selection of what sort of reactor a country decides to buy often depends more on commercial considerations revolving around licensing terms and conditions than it does with respect to any technical considerations. Here's an example which shows how South Korea decided to license a design, build it for themselves, and then export it to other countries. 72 KunMo Chung - Professor at the Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, stated in an interview in 2019 that South Korea wanted to standardize on a single reactor technology in the early 1980s. They had reactors from multiple different vendors, but wanted to license an existing successful design to produce for themselves and for the export market. One of the major factors in deciding to standardize was to allow them to improve operator training by focusing on one design. Professor Chung stated that one of the key factors in selecting a design from ABB-Combustion Engineering was that he personally knew and had a good relationship with the Chief Technical Officer of ABB-Combustion Engineering going back to a time when Professor Chung had been studying and working in the USA. 73 On their side, ABB-Combustion Engineering were having financial problems and they needed a partner to help further develop their new PWR design. Also they stood to gain revenue from this partnership as well. Based on this relationship, the two sides came to a business agreement and South Korea began producing reactors based on this design, while also continuing to develop and improve it further. 74 Here's an example of a case where the developers of a promising technology decided that they had more to gain by not patenting their technology. Instead they decided to freely share their information in order to get other researchers elsewhere to help to advance the technology so that all could benefit from it. 75 In an interview Wacław Gudowski - Prof. Emeritus, Royal Institute of Technology KTH Stockholm stated that the Soviets and later the Russian were the leaders in lead-bismuth cooled reactors. These reactors use lead-bismuth liquid metal alloy as a coolant. In the 1990s the Russian institute working on commercializing this technology were working with Western partners on nuclear technology in general. They considered patenting this technology, but in the end decided to simply publish it openly. 76 Professor Gudowski had even smuggled $60,000 in cash into Russia to finance the patent application in order to get the Russian institute to publish their technology, but the money was not needed. They based this decision on the judgment that it would take 20 years of R&D before the technology was ready for the commercial market, so they wouldn't see a penny on any patents anyway. They were right on this, as it was another 20 years of R&D in Europe, Russia, China, and Korea before lead-bismuth technology was ready for commercial use. 77 It had already seen use in submarine reactors, but the commercial market demanded a more thoroughly developed technology to satisfy commercial needs. By deciding to not patent the technology, the original developers gained from shared R&D rather than chasing the illusary gains from patent licenses on technology that was not ready for the commercial market anyway. 78 I said that patents were involved in nuclear technology from the very earliest days, and I will now turn to that story. When I say the earliest days, I mean probably earlier than you are imaging. I am talking about before WWII. 79 First though I need to give some background information. France and Britain were working on nuclear weapons from the very earliest days of WWII. In Britain's case this was called Tube Alloys. Canada also was conducting nuclear experiments, including building an "atomic pile", but it's not clear if this had any clear practical goals or was done to understand the physics better. 80 If you read the Wikipedia version of history, it states that Tube Alloys was merged into the Manhattan Project. However, participants have stated in interviews that this was not the case, and the Quebec Agreement which supposedly merged them makes no such mention of any merger of the projects, just the setting up of a board to coordinate efforts between the three countries, that is the US, UK, and Canada. In fact the two projects didn't get along that well, and as we shall see below, a big part of that was disputes over patents. ### 81 The following is based on a paper written by Bertrand Goldschmidt, a French nuclear scientist. Two of his colleagues, Hans Halban and Lew Kowarski played a critical role in early nuclear research. Halban in particular was one of the greatest scientific names in nuclear fission. In March of 1939 Halban conducted an experiment showing that neutrons were emitted by the fissioning of uranium. 82 In April Joliot, Halban, Kowarski and Perrin had a pretty good idea of how to use nuclear fission to produce energy and to make an explosive device and decided to file patents on their invention. Each of the four would receive a 5% share of any benefits and the other 80% would go to the research instittute they worked at in Paris. I will now quote from Goldschmidt's paper. 83 The first two patents concerned energy production and were entitled "Device for energy production" and "Method for stabilizing a device for energy production." They roughly defined the principles of the main components of our present power reactors: moderator in heterogeneous or homogeneous arrangements, cooling fluid, control rods, protection shield. The third patent called "Method for perfecting explosive charges" was less brilliant from a foresight point of view though it proposed valid solutions for the trigger, the tamper, and the rapid obtainment of the critical assembly of a possible explosive device. Finally, nearly a year later, after Alfred Nier's experimental confirmation in March 1940 of Niels Bohr's theoretical prediction that uranium 235, the rare isotope of the mixture in natural uranium, was responsible for fission by slow neutrons, the French took out an additional patent on the advantage of using enriched uranium for the chain reaction. End of quote. 84 In May of 1940, the CNRS, the French research institute in Paris, negotiated an agreement with Belgian mining company Union Miniere, who were the world's biggest producer of uranium, at the time a byproduct of radium mining, about a partnership for the world wide exploitation of these patents. However the agreement was not finalized due to the ongoing events in the war. At the beginning of the war, the French government had approved the development of an energy generator - or a nuclear reactor as we would say today, with the intention of creating an engine for submarines. 85 With the fall of France, Halban and Kowarski travelled to the UK with their supply of heavy water where they were received by their UK counterparts, James Chadwick and John Cockroft. The British were already working on an atomic bomb. In the UK the two conducted an experiment showing that it was possible to create nuclear energy using natural uranium and heavy water. In 1941 the British nuclear project was reorganized and given the name Tube Alloys. In 1942 it was decided to move the work on a plutonium bomb to Canada, and Canada would pay for the project. A lab was set up in Montreal and Halban was put in charge of the project. 86 Halban had negotiated this arrangement by offering to arrange to have the French patents for world wide rights outside of France and the French empire transferred to the UK. In return the French team were to be given a key role in the British nuclear project. The author of the paper I am referencing, Bertrand Goldschmidt, was a section leader in Montreal and a colleague of Halban from France. The Montreal group cooperated with the American Manhattan Project and the two shared information and exchanged visits. 87 However, relations between the two began to break down, with a major cause of this being the Americans being unhappy about the French patents and Halban's arrangement to give the British world wide rights to them. The postwar commercial potential for nuclear power was seen to be huge, and this was a major bone of contention. The extensive participation of ICI (Imperial Chemical Industries) engineers in the Tube Alloys project was also objectionable to the Americans. Presumably this had something to do with potential for ICI being involved in future commercialization of the technology. The American Dupont company, a commercial rival of ICI, was also heavily involved in the American atomic bomb project. The eventual result of this was that the US cut off cooperation with the UK-Canada nuclear project. 88 Finally Halban was forced out of the project at the insistence of the Americans, and he was replaced by John Cockroft who moved to Montreal to take charge of the project. The Americans now restore limited cooperation. Kowarski was put in charge of building a heavy water moderated natural uranium reactor at a new site north of Ottawa at Chalk River. This reactor was turned on on the 5th of September, 1945, three days after Japan's surrender. So in what was supposedly a titanic war for survival, key allies were falling out with respect to their ultimate weapon over issues of patents covering post war commercialization. 89 With the end of the war, the nuclear weapons project in Montreal and Chalk River was wound up. Halban, Kowarski, and Goldschmidt returned to France and Cockroft to the UK where they all played senior roles in the nuclear programs of their respective countries. John Cockroft played an important role in the development of the Magnox reactors which Antoine asked about. The Chalk River Site remains as Canada's main nuclear research centre to this day, and Canada was to continue development of heavy water moderated natural uranium reactors. 90 The first commercial nuclear power plant was commissioned in the UK in 1956, roughly 17 years after the original French nuclear patents. At that time, UK patents had a term of 16 years. While I am not a patent lawyer, it would appear that these patents would likely have expired before nuclear power was ever commercialized. So to answer the question about patents, the first patents on nuclear energy date to before WWII started, and the very first two were about nuclear power plants and it was only the third one which covered nuclear weapons. -------------------- 91 Thanks to other listeners. A number of other listeners made comments saying they were really enjoying the series. I would like to thank the following for their kind words of encouragement. They helped make the work required to do this worthwhile. They are brian-in-ohio mnw Clinton Antoine bjb Kevin O'Brien Trey L'andrew Archer72 Jim DeVore If you have commented but I have forgotten your name, or if the show was recorded before I got a chance to read your comment, I would still like to thank you. 92 Conclusion I would like to thank all the listeners for their kind comments and insightful questions. I hope that I have answered these questions to the satisfaction of everyone. I look forward to hearing from all of you in future podcast episodes including those on other topics. -------------------- Proceedings of the 29th annual conference of the Canadian Nuclear Association and 10th annual conference of the Canadian Nuclear Society. V. 1-3 https://inis.iaea.org/records/m2s41-40917 This has a paper by Bertrand Goldschmidt about the work of the French scientists in Canada. -------------------- Provide feedback on this episode.

40 Jahre nach Tschernobyl wird Atomkraft wieder diskutiert. EU-Kommissionspräsidentin Ursula von der Leyen nennt den Ausstieg einen "strategischen Fehler". Zurecht? Ein Interview mit Volker Quaschning, Professor für Regenerative Energiesysteme. Von WDR 5.

Dr. Daniel Stelter warnt vor dem wirtschaftlichen Absturz Deutschlands: Im Interview zu seinem neuen Buch „Absturz“ erklärt der Ökonom, warum Deutschland wirtschaftlich immer weiter zurückfällt – und welche Sofortmaßnahmen jetzt nötig sind, um Industrie, Wohlstand und Energieversorgung zu retten. Warum befindet sich Deutschlands Wirtschaft in der Krise? Was macht die Politik falsch? Warum geraten Industrie, Mittelstand und Standort Deutschland immer stärker unter Druck? Und was müsste jetzt passieren, um den Absturz noch zu stoppen? Im Gespräch spricht Dr. Daniel Stelter Klartext über die größten wirtschaftlichen Fehlentwicklungen in Deutschland und beschreibt konkret, welche Maßnahmen er als Kanzler sofort ergreifen würde. Dabei geht es unter anderem um Wirtschaftspolitik, Energieversorgung, Atomkraft, Small Modular Reactors (SMR), Industriepolitik, Wettbewerbsfähigkeit, Bürokratie, Wachstum und die Zukunft Deutschlands. Dieses Interview zeigt, warum Deutschland aus Sicht von Daniel Stelter an einem entscheidenden Wendepunkt steht – und was jetzt geschehen muss, damit unser Land nicht weiter an Wohlstand, wirtschaftlicher Stärke und internationaler Wettbewerbsfähigkeit verliert. Themen im Interview:

This show has been flagged as Explicit by the host. New hosts There were no new hosts this month. Last Month's Shows Id Day Date Title Host 4586 Mon 2026-03-02 HPR Community News for February 2026 HPR Volunteers 4587 Tue 2026-03-03 UNIX Curio #1 - Shell Archives Vance 4588 Wed 2026-03-04 HPR Beer Garden 11 - Belgian Scotch Ale Kevie 4589 Thu 2026-03-05 YouTube Subscriptions 2025 #15 Ahuka 4590 Fri 2026-03-06 Playing Civilization V, Part 9 Ahuka 4591 Mon 2026-03-09 A Bit of Git Lee 4592 Tue 2026-03-10 Happy by shower # 2 Antoine 4593 Wed 2026-03-11 Nuclear Reactor Technology - Ep 8 Generation Four Reactors Whiskeyjack 4594 Thu 2026-03-12 Hackerpublic Radio New Years Eve Show 2026 Episode 2 Honkeymagoo 4595 Fri 2026-03-13 WATER WATER EVERYWHERE! operat0r 4596 Mon 2026-03-16 Adding voice-over audio track created using text to speech on the movie subtitles Ken Fallon 4597 Tue 2026-03-17 UNIX Curio #2 - fgrep Vance 4598 Wed 2026-03-18 Recording good audio using open source tools Shane - StrandedOutput 4599 Thu 2026-03-19 Women in digital and games event Dave Hingley 4600 Fri 2026-03-20 The First Doctor, Part 5 Ahuka 4601 Mon 2026-03-23 How to be a better writer enistello 4602 Tue 2026-03-24 Hackerpublic Radio New Years Eve Show 2026 Episode 3 Honkeymagoo 4603 Wed 2026-03-25 On the Erosion of Freedom in Open Source Software HopperMCS 4604 Thu 2026-03-26 Quick Tips for January 20 26 operat0r 4605 Fri 2026-03-27 Lee locks down his wifey poo Elsbeth 4606 Mon 2026-03-30 My Nerdy Childhood: From Floppy Disks to Dial-Up Dreams Trollercoaster 4607 Tue 2026-03-31 UNIX Curio #3 - basename and dirname Vance Comments this month Past shows hpr3711 (2022-10-24) "Cars" by Zen_Floater2. m0dese7en said: "Additional details on cars" (2026-03-13 16:44:12) hpr4333 (2025-03-12) "A Radically Transparent Computer Without Complex VLSI" by Marc W. Abel. Marc said: "New online home for Dauug|36 and Dauug|18" (2026-03-25 15:18:15) hpr4424 (2025-07-17) "How I use Newsboat for Podcasts and Reddit" by Archer72. أحمد المحمودي said: "Not fixed" (2026-03-31 00:54:19) hpr4509 (2025-11-13) "HPR Beer Garden 5 - Heferweisen" by Kevie. Gan Ainm said: "Hefeweizen" (2026-03-04 06:47:39) Kevie said: "Thanks Gan" (2026-03-13 15:28:45) hpr4553 (2026-01-14) "Nuclear Reactor Technology - Ep 4 Less Common Reactor Types" by Whiskeyjack. Antoine said: "Were/are the designs patented?" (2026-03-18 12:41:35) Whiskeyjack said: "Reply to Antoine" (2026-03-19 03:31:50) Antoine said: "I will" (2026-03-21 02:30:29) hpr4565 (2026-01-30) "HPR Beer Garden 9 - Barley Wine" by Kevie. Aleman said: "Beer Garden" (2026-03-06 19:25:26) hpr4571 (2026-02-09) "Data processing retrospective" by Lee. Archer72 said: "previous generation" (2026-03-03 15:44:12) hpr4573 (2026-02-11) "Nuclear Reactor Technology - Ep 6 Thorium Reactors" by Whiskeyjack. Archer72 said: "Interesting series" (2026-02-28 16:59:15) Whiskeyjack said: "Reply to Archer72" (2026-02-28 23:06:46) Clinton said: "Modern situation." (2026-03-07 11:30:14) Whiskeyjack said: "Reply to Clinton" (2026-03-07 18:42:23) hpr4574 (2026-02-12) "UNIX Curio #0 - Introduction" by Vance. murph said: "Great show, looking forward to more." (2026-03-01 19:21:46) hpr4575 (2026-02-13) "Making First Contact" by Ken Fallon. Archer72 said: "Good to hear 73's" (2026-02-28 15:51:52) hpr4576 (2026-02-16) "Responce to Lee/Elsbeth eps" by operat0r. candycanearter07 said: "relatable episode" (2026-03-10 01:39:18) hpr4577 (2026-02-17) "HPR Beer Garden 10 - Scotch Ale/Wee Heavy" by Kevie. Kevie said: "Upcoming beers" (2026-02-26 18:14:16) hpr4583 (2026-02-25) "Nuclear Reactor Technology - Ep 7 Small Modular Reactors" by Whiskeyjack. brian-in-ohio said: "good shows" (2026-03-02 21:10:12) Whiskeyjack said: "Response to brian-in-ohio for HPR4583 Small Modular Reactors" (2026-03-03 23:38:55) hpr4584 (2026-02-26) "Recording a show, and crappy audio" by Archer72. Dave Lee (thelovebug) said: "Audio quality" (2026-02-27 08:33:24) Kevin O'Brien said: "The Zoom was perfect" (2026-02-27 17:29:43) Archer72 said: "Bad mic" (2026-03-03 15:08:13) jezra said: "false advertising! " (2026-04-03 17:28:05) hpr4585 (2026-02-27) "mpv util scripts" by candycanearter. Windigo said: "mpv fanclub" (2026-02-28 01:55:28) Windigo said: "Re: mpv fanclub" (2026-03-01 05:07:24) Archer72 said: "Second in mpv fanclub" (2026-03-01 08:52:41) candycanearter07 said: "updated script" (2026-03-01 22:35:38) This month's shows hpr4586 (2026-03-02) "HPR Community News for February 2026" by HPR Volunteers. candycanearter07 said: "41:40" (2026-03-01 23:39:18) Whiskeyjack said: "HPR Commnity News discussion on audio" (2026-03-03 23:11:25) hpr4587 (2026-03-03) "UNIX Curio #1 - Shell Archives" by Vance. Archer72 said: "Continuing series" (2026-03-03 15:15:19) xmanmonk said: "uuencode/uudecode on Solaris" (2026-03-05 01:47:53) Vance said: "Thanks, and Solaris" (2026-03-07 20:10:08) Jim DeVore said: "Thanks for the trip down memory lane!" (2026-03-17 01:19:46) hpr4591 (2026-03-09) "A Bit of Git" by Lee. candycanearter07 said: "anecdotal teaching is the best kind" (2026-03-09 04:58:24) hpr4592 (2026-03-10) "Happy by shower # 2" by Antoine. candycanearter07 said: "interesting!" (2026-03-10 04:20:16) Antoine said: "Sharing (response to candycanearter07)" (2026-03-21 02:27:17) hpr4593 (2026-03-11) "Nuclear Reactor Technology - Ep 8 Generation Four Reactors" by Whiskeyjack. Jim DeVore said: "Great series!" (2026-03-17 01:13:51) Whiskeyjack said: "Response to Jim DeVore" (2026-03-17 13:46:31) hpr4596 (2026-03-16) "Adding voice-over audio track created using text to speech on the movie subtitles" by Ken Fallon. folky said: "Interesting solution, but annoying " (2026-02-05 11:54:36) Carsten said: "Amazing project" (2026-02-25 00:29:08) candycanearter07 said: "interesting!!" (2026-03-16 13:38:03) hpr4597 (2026-03-17) "UNIX Curio #2 - fgrep" by Vance. Ken Fallon said: "Time to active use" (2026-03-05 05:58:31) L'andrew said: "Nice job explaining *grep features." (2026-03-18 03:34:11) candycanearter07 said: "informative" (2026-03-18 03:52:52) Vance said: "Expressions" (2026-03-20 18:16:09) hpr4598 (2026-03-18) "Recording good audio using open source tools" by Shane - StrandedOutput. Archer72 said: "Great tips!" (2026-03-19 10:39:24) Ole Aamot said: "GarageJam 6.0.1" (2026-03-24 01:50:51) hpr4600 (2026-03-20) "The First Doctor, Part 5" by Ahuka. Kevie said: "Great series" (2026-03-21 15:22:59) Kevin O'Brien said: "I think I will" (2026-03-21 21:23:38) Archer72 said: "Great series and 2nd continuation " (2026-03-21 22:35:05) hpr4605 (2026-03-27) "Lee locks down his wifey poo" by Elsbeth. Ken Fallon said: "Congratulations" (2026-03-18 11:09:45) Elsbeth said: "Thank you!" (2026-03-27 11:10:10) Trollercoaster said: "Congrats - and now we want all the fun puns!" (2026-03-27 12:58:38) Antoine said: "=)" (2026-03-29 22:39:06) ClaudioM said: "Congratulations to You Both!" (2026-03-30 13:22:43) Paulj said: "Congratulations" (2026-04-04 19:52:01) hpr4606 (2026-03-30) "My Nerdy Childhood: From Floppy Disks to Dial-Up Dreams" by Trollercoaster. Trey said: "Trip down memory lane..." (2026-03-30 14:24:54) xmanmonk said: "Great Episode!" (2026-03-30 16:23:43) Trollercoaster said: "Back to you..." (2026-03-31 08:24:58) Trollercoaster said: "Not to janitors" (2026-03-31 08:26:06) ClaudioM said: "Nerdy Nostalgia!" (2026-03-31 17:20:34) hpr4607 (2026-03-31) "UNIX Curio #3 - basename and dirname" by Vance. xmanmonk said: "Great episode!" (2026-03-31 14:19:12) Mailing List discussions Policy decisions surrounding HPR are taken by the community as a whole. This discussion takes place on the Mailing List which is open to all HPR listeners and contributors. The discussions are open and available on the HPR server under Mailman. The threaded discussions this month can be found here: https://lists.hackerpublicradio.com/pipermail/hpr/2026-March/thread.html Events Calendar With the kind permission of LWN.net we are linking to The LWN.net Community Calendar. Quoting the site: This is the LWN.net community event calendar, where we track events of interest to people using and developing Linux and free software. Clicking on individual events will take you to the appropriate web page. Provide feedback on this episode.

This hour, Dave Cohen has on John Flake, Professor of chemical engineering and Associate Vice Chancellor of Research at LSU, to discuss the benefits and risks of nuclear power in Louisiana.

4. Zubrin discusses technological frontiers, starting with small modular reactorsdesigned for factory assembly to improve competitiveness. He emphasizes that nuclear power is "absolutely key" to the human future in space, providing essential energy for Mars bases and propulsion where solar energy is insufficient. Regarding fusion, Zubrin expresses optimism that private startups may achieve ignition this decade by bypassing stagnant government programs. He concludes that the U.S. must revitalize its nuclear industrial base to ensure economic independence and national security, warning that current restrictive energy policies threaten Americanprosperity. (4)1953 ATOMIC CANNON.

In Folge 208 des Dachthekenduetts sprechen André F. Lichtschlag und Martin Moczarski über die Baden-Württemberg-Wahl, den Absturz der FDP, Deindustrialisierung und Auto-Krise, den Irankrieg samt Öl-Schock, Atomkraft, Ost-Wahlen und die Schweizer ÖRR-Abstimmung.Alle erwähnten Links finden Sie hier:https://freiheitsfunken.info/2026/03/12/23865-dachthekenduett-folge-208-tv-merz-kapituliert-trump-eskaliert-jetzt-fliegt-uns-alles-um-die-ohrenBildquelle Foto Friedrich Merz: penofoto / Shutterstock.comhttps://www.shutterstock.com/de/image-photo/kiel-germany-june-26-2023-portrait-2409151483Möchten Sie unsere Arbeit unterstützen?––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––Spenden Sie Werkzeuge für die libertäre GlücksschmiedePayPal (auch Kreditkarte) / Überweisung / Bitcoin / Monero:

This show has been flagged as Clean by the host. 01 Introduction This episode is the seventh in an 8 part series on nuclear reactor technology. In this episode we will describe a topic which has been in the news in recent years, which is "small modular reactors", or SMRs for short. 03 What is an SMR? Basic Definition A small modular reactor is a nuclear reactor that is designed to be largely built in a factory and subject to as little on-site assembly as possible. The main goal is to lower costs by reducing construction times and allowing a more rapid start of return on investment. 04 Sized Based Definition Some people put a numerical size limit on SMRs, saying that they must be no larger than 300 MW to qualify as an SMR. However this limit is not universally accepted, and not all SMR designs fall within this arbitrary limit. I will ignore this numerical limit and just consider anything to be an SMR if it meets the criteria of being largely built in a factory with minimal on-site assembly. 05 The Actual Goal of the SMR Idea The actual goal of the SMR idea is to build reactors rapidly and efficiently on more or less an assembly line basis rather than hand crafting each one. One engineer in the nuclear industry has compared building reactors to building ships. Traditional shipbuilding techniques involved assembling each ship from the keel up on the slipways from individual components. 06 Newer shipbuilding techniques assemble ships as separate "blocks" inside factory-like buildings and then join completed blocks together in a final assembly stage. This requires careful planning and tight quality control, but it results in building ships much more rapidly and economically. This engineer said that SMRs are attempting to bring this newer way of doing things to the nuclear reactor industry as well. 07 SMR Categories - Small Versus Micro 08 Small SMRs 09 Small SMRs and Small Grids 10 Micro SMRs for Micro Loads 13 Micro SMRs for Large Industry 14 SMRs to Power Data Centres 15 What's This Nonsense About "Micro Small Modular Reactor" You Ask? 17 Small Reactors and Modular Reactors That Are Not SMRs 20 Standard Versus Proprietary Fuel 23 Where SMRs are Currently Being Built 24 HTR-PM in China 28 Repurposed Ship Reactors in Russia 31 300 MW BWR in Canada 33 470 MW PWR in UK 35 25 MW PWR in Argentina 37 Various Experimental SMRs 38 Modular Large Reactors 40 Conclusion SMRs are a new trend in nuclear reactor design. However, they are really two different things which fill two different needs. One style is intended to adopt designs which allow for more rapid construction with more of the work being done in the factory and less on the construction site, with the overall goal of reducing costs. The other style is to provide very small reactors to power remote communities and mines, or to provide process heat to large industries. The first SMRs are in operation or under construction. The most promising grid scale designs at present are simply scaled down and simplified conventional designs that use standard commercial fuel. Larger reactors will incorporate modular construction techniques, blurring the lines between them and SMRs. In the next episode we will talk about future reactor technologies, particularly what are referred to as "Generation IV" reactors. Provide feedback on this episode.

Clean Energy equities have comfortably outperformed the major indices in 2025.  Laurent and Gerard are joined by friend of the show Shanu Mathew, an equity portfolio manager everyone in the sector knows to unpack what's really driving this performance.  We begin by putting recent returns into a longer-term context — and by flagging an important caveat: some of the strongest results are coming from highly concentrated portfolios.  Shanu makes a critical distinction that often gets blurred in market commentary: equipment providers versus sellers of electrons. On one side sit companies like GE Vernova, Siemens Energy, Schneider Electric, Caterpillar — and the surprise guest, Bloom Energy. On the other are utilities and IPPs. The divergence is striking. Equipment manufacturers have gone ballistic; utilities have performed, but at a far more pedestrian pace.  The difference, unsurprisingly, is pricing power. Equipment suppliers — particularly those insulated from Chinese competition — have been able to push through aggressive price increases, turbocharged by surging demand from Hyperscalers. Utilities, by contrast, remain constrained by regulation, public scrutiny, and political pressure.  The result? Hyperscalers are increasingly looking to self-generation: reciprocating engines, fuel cells, and a growing enthusiasm for frontier technologies such as Enhanced Geothermal and Small Modular Reactors.  We walk through these alternatives, examine how public markets are valuing them today, and end where every cycle eventually leads us: Are we in a bubble? Or, as Chuck Prince, then CEO of Citigroup, famously put it on the eve of the 2008 financial crisis:“As long as the music is playing, you've got to get up and dance.”

Man kann es gut finden oder auch nicht, Fakt ist: Geht es nach den Hyperscalern Meta, Amazon, Google und Microsoft, dann wird AI ab etwa 2030 zu großen Teilen von Atomkraft angetrieben. Die AI Talk Hosts ⁠⁠⁠Jakob Steinschaden⁠⁠⁠ (Trending Topics, ⁠⁠⁠newsrooms⁠⁠⁠) und ⁠⁠⁠Clemens Wasner⁠⁠⁠ (⁠⁠⁠enliteAI⁠⁠⁠, ⁠⁠⁠AI Austria⁠⁠⁠) diskutieren im Podcast, warum das so ist - die Themen:⚡ Energiekrise der KI: Trainingsleistung verdoppelt sich alle sechs Monate – von GPT-3 mit unter 10 Megawatt bis zu künftigen Modellen mit einem Gigawatt und mehr

Marknaden byter skinn! Vi har samlat fem härliga personer som på olika sätt jobbar med energi, AI, krypto finans och investeringar. Marknaden består av: - *Petter Hjertstedt* - f.d. CFO Tethys Oil - *Johan Isaksson* - privatinvesterare och poddlegend från Börspodden. - *Lars Jörnow* - medgrundare EQT Ventures. - *Jacob Bursell* - ekonomijournalist & poddare, Monopol Media. - *Hampus Brodén* - medgrundare & VD på Stabelo. - *Viktor Fritzén* - styrelseproffs, (tf) CFO på Montrose. I veckans avsnitt: Hampus, Viktor Johan och Jacob diskuterar OpenAI:s överraskande beslut att börja sälja annonser, konkurrensen med Google, de hysteriska investeringarna i datahallar och AI-infrastruktur. Är allt en enorm bubbla, eller är det försvarbara investeringar. --- ## *TIDSSTÄMPLAR* *00:00:00** - Intro: Marknaden är tillbaka i ny skepnad *00:03:00** - OpenAI börjar sälja annonser – varningssignal? *00:05:00** - Hampus: OpenAI:s utmanande situation mot Google *00:07:00** - Viktor: Lock-in-effekten när AI "känner dig" *00:11:00* - 400-500 miljarder dollar i AI-investeringar *00:14:00* - Vinstpotential vs kapitalkostnader *00:17:00* - Var hamnar värdet i AI-kedjan? *00:20:00* - Applikationslaget och VC-finansiering *00:24:00* - Spotify-parallellen: Reklamfinansiering vs prenumeration *00:27:00* - World Models och framtida compute-behov *00:31:00* - Michael Burry kritik: Avskrivningstider och chiplivslängd *00:36:00* - Chipens ekonomiska livslängd och nyttjandegrad *00:39:00* - Varför investeras det så snabbt? 3000 miljarder på tre år *00:42:00* - Prisoner's dilemma: Alla måste hänga med *00:47:00* - Energifrågan: AI:s växande elbehov *00:52:00* - SMR:er och hyperscalers *00:57:00* - Kärnkraft vs förnybart *01:02:00* - Tyskland vs Frankrike i energipolitik *01:07:00* - Trump 2.0 och handelspolitik *01:12:00* - Europa: Draghi-rapporten och konkurrenskraft --- ## *FEEDBACK & TIPS* Twitter: @marknaden_podd Mail: kontakt [a] monopol.se --- ## *ÄMNEN SOM DISKUTERAS* • *OpenAI & Annonsmodellen* - Varför börjar ChatGPT sälja annonser? Är det ett tecken på finansiell press eller smart affär? • *AI-konkurrensen* - Google vs OpenAI: Vem har bäst förutsättningar? Diskussion om GPU:er, molntjänster, IP-rättigheter och distribution • *Lock-in-effekter* - Hur AI-modeller "lär känna" användare och skapar stickiness • *Energifrågan* - AI:s enorma energibehov och kärnkraftens roll i framtiden • *SMR:er och hyperscalers* - Small Modular Reactors som lösning för datacenter • *Geopolitik & Energi* - Tyskland vs Frankrike, Kina bygger 150 reaktorer • *Västs infrastrukturproblem* - Varför tar det decennier att bygga här? • *Trump 2.0* - Förändrad handelspolitik och tullar • * Europa vs Kina/USA* - Draghi-rapporten och konkurrenskraft • *Reglering som hinder* - AI Act och överreglering i Europa • *Tech-jättar* - Varför misslyckades Europa skapa sina egna FAANG? • *Riskkapital & Exits* - Strukturella problem i Europas tech-ekosystem • *Investeringsläget* - AI-bubbla eller inte? Diskussion om värderingar • *Google som investering* - Deep value eller fundamental risk? • *IT-bubblan som parallell* - Lärdomar från år 2000 --- #marknaden #ekonomi #ai #openai #google #energi #kärnkraft #finans #investering #tech #europa #kina #usa #trump #podcast #svenska

CES 2026 Just Showed Us the Future. It's More Practical Than You Think.CES has always been part crystal ball, part carnival. But something shifted this year.I caught up with Brian Comiskey—Senior Director of Innovation and Trends at CTA and a futurist by trade—days after 148,000 people walked the Las Vegas floor. What he described wasn't the usual parade of flashy prototypes destined for tech graveyards. This was different. This was technology getting serious about actually being useful.Three mega trends defined the show: intelligent transformation, longevity, and engineering tomorrow. Fancy terms, but they translate to something concrete: AI that works, health tech that extends lives, and innovations that move us, power us, and feed us. Not technology for its own sake. Technology with a job to do.The AI conversation has matured. A year ago, generative AI was the headline—impressive demos, uncertain applications. Now the use cases are landing. Industrial AI is optimizing factory operations through digital twins. Agentic AI is handling enterprise workflows autonomously. And physical AI—robotics—is getting genuinely capable. Brian pointed to robotic vacuums that now have arms, wash floors, and mop. Not revolutionary in isolation, but symbolic of something larger: AI escaping the screen and entering the physical world.Humanoid robots took a visible leap. Companies like Sharpa and Real Hand showcased machines folding laundry, picking up papers, playing ping pong. The movement is becoming fluid, dexterous, human-like. LG even introduced a consumer-facing humanoid. We're past the novelty phase. The question now is integration—how these machines will collaborate, cowork, and coexist with humans.Then there's energy—the quiet enabler hiding behind the AI headlines.Korea Hydro Nuclear Power demonstrated small modular reactors. Next-generation nuclear that could cleanly power cities with minimal waste. A company called Flint Paper Battery showcased recyclable batteries using zinc instead of lithium and cobalt. These aren't sexy announcements. They're foundational.Brian framed it well: AI demands energy. Quantum computing demands energy. The future demands energy. Without solving that equation, everything else stalls. The good news? AI itself is being deployed for grid modernization, load balancing, and optimizing renewable cycles. The technologies aren't competing—they're converging.Quantum made the leap from theory to presence. CES launched a new area called Foundry this year, featuring innovations from D-Wave and Quantum Computing Inc. Brian still sees quantum as a 2030s defining technology, but we're in the back half of the 2020s now. The runway is shorter than we thought.His predictions for 2026: quantum goes more mainstream, humanoid robotics moves beyond enterprise into consumer markets, and space technologies start playing a bigger role in connectivity and research. The threads are weaving together.Technology conversations often drift toward dystopia—job displacement, surveillance, environmental cost. Brian sees it differently. The convergence of AI, quantum, and clean energy could push things toward something better. The pieces exist. The question is whether we assemble them wisely.CES is a snapshot. One moment in the relentless march. But this year's snapshot suggests technology is entering a phase where substance wins over spectacle.That's a future worth watching.This episode is part of the Redefining Society and Technology podcast's CES 2026 coverage. Subscribe to stay informed as technology and humanity continue to intersect.Subscribe to the Redefining Society and Technology podcast. Stay curious. Stay human.> https://www.linkedin.com/newsletters/7079849705156870144/Marco Ciappelli: https://www.marcociappelli.com/ Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Kurt Terrani is CEO of Standard Nuclear, a company focused on a part of nuclear energy that gets far less attention than reactor designs but can become the true bottleneck: fuel.In this episode, Kurt provides a nuclear fuels 101, walking through the front end of the fuel cycle from uranium processing and enrichment to fabrication. He explains in plain terms what makes TRISO fuel different, why it appears so frequently in next-generation reactor designs, and how fuel performance shapes reactor economics, safety, and scalability.The conversation also unpacks Standard Nuclear's origin story, which emerged from a Chapter 11 restructuring of UltraSafe Nuclear, and explores a future where reactor-agnostic fuel suppliers replace vertically integrated fuel strategies to unlock faster deployment across advanced nuclear technologies.Episode recorded on Dec 4, 2025 (Published on Jan 6, 2026)In this episode, we cover: [1:53] An overview of Standard Nuclear[3:26] Nuclear's history in Oak Ridge, TN[6:07] The nuclear fuel cycle [8:35] US involvement and ownership in this cycle[10:17] TRISO fuel or coated particle fuel[17:56] Why enrichment access constrains deployment [21:43] Government's role bridging fuel supply gaps[24:03] Why reactor companies try vertical integration[26:26] Standard Nuclear's origin story [28:51] Why fuel must become a commodity[33:42] The case for standardizing TRISO specs[39:20] Challenges of building a fuels company Enjoyed this episode? Please leave us a review! Share feedback or suggest future topics and guests at info@mcj.vc.Connect with MCJ:Cody Simms on LinkedInVisit mcj.vcSubscribe to the MCJ Newsletter*Editing and post-production work for this episode was provided by The Podcast Consultant

Comments/ideas: theasiaclimatecapitalpodcast@gmail.com Stephen Edkins, CEO of Koya Nuclear, examines how TRISO fuel and small modular reactors could reshape Asia's decarbonisation pathways. The discussion explains what TRISO is, why its high-temperature resilience and safety profile matter, and how it changes the economics of SMR projects. Stephen also explores government policy, financing hurdles, supply-chain needs, and why he expects a significant SMR build-out once a handful of designs reach commercial scale in the 2030s.ABOUT STEPHEN: Stephen Edkins is the Chief Executive Officer of Koya Nuclear, a company that focuses on producing and supplying TRISO nuclear fuel for small modular reactors. He has been working and investing in the clean energy space for over 20 years. He was part of the team that took solar and battery companies to the New York Stock Exchange (ticker symbol SOL) and the London Stock Exchange (ticker symbol IKA) respectively, and was also involved in the early stages of Envision Energy. Prior to that, he was an investment banker in New York covering Latin America with Banco Santander. Originally from the United Kingdom, he holds a Master of Arts degree in Philosophy, Politics and Economics from the University of Oxford.FEEDBACK: Email Host | HOST, PRODUCTION, ARTWORK: Joseph Jacobelli | MUSIC: Ep0-29 The Open Goldberg Variations, Kimiko Ishizaka Ep30-50 Orchestra Gli Armonici – Tomaso Albinoni, Op.07, Concerto 04 per archi in Sol - III. Allegro. | Ep51 – Brandenburg Concerto No. 4 in G, Movement I (Allegro), BWV 1049 Kevin MacLeod. Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 4.0 License

In the news, why the UK appears to be betting big on small modular nuclear reactors. Also, Iran seeds the skies in bid to end its worst drought in decades. And moss grows fat on a rolling stone - but a new study claims it can survive in space. We'll explore the significance. Like this podcast? Please help us by supporting the Naked Scientists

In this episode of Crazy Wisdom, host Stewart Alsop talks with Kevin Smith, co-founder of Snipd, about how AI is reshaping the way we listen, learn, and interact with podcasts. They explore Snipd's vision of transforming podcasts into living knowledge systems, the evolution of machine learning from finance to large language models, and the broader connection between AI, robotics, and energy as the foundation for the next technological era. Kevin also touches on ideas like the bitter lesson, reinforcement learning, and the growing energy demands of AI. Listeners can try Snipd's premium version free for a month using this promo link.Check out this GPT we trained on the conversationTimestamps00:00 – Stewart Alsop welcomes Kevin Smith, co-founder of Snipd, to discuss AI, podcasting, and curiosity-driven learning.05:00 – Kevin explains Snipd's snipping feature, chatting with episodes, and future plans for voice interaction with podcasts.10:00 – They discuss vector search, embeddings, and context windows, comparing full-episode context to chunked transcripts.15:00 – Kevin shares his background in mathematics and economics, his shift from finance to machine learning, and early startup work in AI.20:00 – They explore early quant models versus modern machine learning, statistical modeling, and data limitations in finance.25:00 – Conversation turns to transformer models, pretraining, and the bitter lesson—how compute-based methods outperform human-crafted systems. 30:00 – Stewart connects this to RLHF, Scale AI, and data scarcity; Kevin reflects on reinforcement learning's future. 35:00 – They pivot to Snipd's podcast ecosystem, hidden gems like Founders Podcast, and how stories shape entrepreneurial insight. 40:00 – ETH Zurich, robotics, and startup culture come up, linking academia to real-world innovation. 45:00 – They close on AI, robotics, and energy as the pillars of the future, debating nuclear and solar power's role in sustaining progress.Key InsightsPodcasts as dynamic knowledge systems: Kevin Smith presents Snipd as an AI-powered tool that transforms podcasts into interactive learning environments. By allowing listeners to “snip” and summarize meaningful moments, Snipd turns passive listening into active knowledge management—bridging curiosity, memory, and technology in a way that reframes podcasts as living knowledge capsules rather than static media.AI transforming how we engage with information: The discussion highlights how AI enables entirely new modes of interaction—chatting directly with podcast episodes, asking follow-up questions, and contextualizing information across an author's full body of work. This evolution points toward a future where knowledge consumption becomes conversational and personalized rather than linear and one-size-fits-all.Vectorization and context windows matter: Kevin explains that Snipd currently avoids heavy use of vector databases, opting instead to feed entire episodes into large models. This choice enhances coherence and comprehension, reflecting how advances in context windows have reshaped how AI understands complex audio content.Machine learning's roots in finance shaped early AI thinking: Kevin's journey from quantitative finance to AI reveals how statistical modeling laid the groundwork for modern learning systems. While finance once relied on rigid, theory-based models, the machine learning paradigm replaced those priors with flexible, data-driven discovery—an essential philosophical shift in how intelligence is approached.The Bitter Lesson and the rise of compute: Together they unpack Richard Sutton's “bitter lesson”—the idea that methods leveraging computation and data inevitably surpass those built from human intuition. This insight serves as a compass for understanding why transformers, pretraining, and scaling have driven recent AI breakthroughs.Reinforcement learning and data scarcity define AI's next phase: Stewart links RLHF and the work of companies like Scale AI and Surge AI to the broader question of data limits. Kevin agrees that the next wave of AI will depend on reinforcement learning and simulated environments that generate new, high-quality data beyond what humans can label.The future hinges on AI, robotics, and energy: Kevin closes with a framework for the next decade: AI provides intelligence, robotics applies it to the physical world, and energy sustains it all. He warns that society must shift from fearing energy use to innovating in production—especially through nuclear and solar power—to meet the demands of an increasingly intelligent, interconnected world.

Nuclear Proliferation Concerns Regarding Small Modular Reactors and Weapons Testing. Henry Sokolski raises proliferation concerns about Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) using High-Assay Low-Enriched Uranium (HALEU) fuel (20% enriched). Declassified cables from 1954 and 1977 suggested that uranium above 10% requires special concern, demanding a review before SMRs are exported. Sokolski also clarifies that US maintenance of its nuclear arsenal relies on non-critical tests and simulations, not full-yield explosions, though adversaries may be conducting critical tests.

Nuclear Proliferation Concerns Regarding Small Modular Reactors and Weapons Testing. Henry Sokolski raises proliferation concerns about Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) using High-Assay Low-Enriched Uranium (HALEU) fuel (20% enriched). Declassified cables from 1954 and 1977 suggested that uranium above 10% requires special concern, demanding a review before SMRs are exported. Sokolski also clarifies that US maintenance of its nuclear arsenal relies on non-critical tests and simulations, not full-yield explosions, though adversaries may be conducting critical tests.

PREVIEW. Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) and Nuclear Proliferation Risk. Henry Sokolski discusses declassified communications indicating that 20% enriched uranium is sufficient to build a bomb, which is the enrichment level proposed for Small Modular Reactors (SMRs). SMRs are embraced by the political class because they provide the massive electricity required by AI and tech centers. Both political parties are criticized for indiscriminately supporting nuclear generation.

Oct 31, 2025 – Curious about the future of energy, small modular reactors, and the impact of AI on utilities? Energy expert Robert Rapier discusses the global shale revolution, OPEC's strategies, and why U.S. energy stocks are outperforming...

Texas Talks host Brad Swail sits down with Reed Clay, President of the Texas Nuclear Alliance, to discuss how nuclear energy could reshape Texas' power future. Clay explains why the state hasn't built a new plant in over 30 years, the myths and politics that sidelined nuclear in the 1990s, and how AI data centers and small modular reactors (SMRs) are driving a modern nuclear renaissance. From Winter Storm Uri to House Bill 14 and the creation of the Texas Nuclear Energy Office, this episode explores how Texas can stay competitive, reliable, and carbon-free through a smart mix of nuclear and natural gas. Watch Full-Length Interviews: https://www.youtube.com/@TexasTalks

Mike Walsh, IMEG Senior Director of Industrial, joins this episode to discuss small modular reactors (SMRs) and their potential for becoming an integral source of power for manufacturers and industrial campuses. SMRs typically produce 50 to 300 megawatts of power, unlike traditional nuclear plants that generate between 1,000 and 1,500 megawatts. Mike is quick to clarify, however, that the adjective “small” is relative in comparison to traditional reactors. “They're not small—they're just smaller,” he says of SMRs. “They're still large, sophisticated facilities. But their modular construction changes everything.” SMRs work on the same basic principle as traditional reactors: nuclear fission heats water into steam, which drives a turbine to produce electricity. Unlike traditional reactors, the reactor portion is manufactured within a factory—where conditions are controlled and quality assurance is consistent—and are then shipped to a location. They require significant real estate—typically 10 to 100 acres, but still far less than the 250 to 400 acres for a traditional nuclear plant. Their smaller footprint makes SMRs particularly well suited for industrial campuses. And while roughly two-thirds of a traditional nuclear plant's thermal energy is lost as waste heat, SMRs can capture and reuse that excess energy. “If we can use that heat for industrial processes or building systems, overall efficiency on an industrial site could reach 80 or 90 percent,” Mike says. The 24/7 on-site generation of power also will be highly beneficial to industries as the reliability and strain on the grid continue to worsen, energy costs rise, and owners begin to see high demand factors on utility bills. With few new nuclear plants built in the U.S. since the 1970s, the path forward for SMRs is murky. “No one really knows yet how these will be regulated,” Mike says. “You can't apply the same rules that were written for massive, one-of-a-kind nuclear facilities. This is new territory.” Economics also is a factor. Early SMRs will be expensive, but Mike draws a parallel to renewable energy's evolution. “Solar was once prohibitively costly too,” he says. “Then technology improved, production scaled, and prices fell. The same thing will happen here.” The general perception of nuclear power will also need to be overcome. ”It's the not-in-my-backyard syndrome kind of thing,” Mike says. “There are reasons why nuclear accidents happened in the past, but it's highly improbable that that would happen with these newer facilities and the way they have some passive ability, if they lost all power to the site, to still cool that reactor and not have a meltdown. Despite the challenges, Mike believes nuclear power will be an essential part of a diversified energy mix of the future, which will also include wind, solar, hydro-electric, and, for some time at least, coal. “There are a lot of pieces of the puzzle for how we are going to create energy now and into the future.” Several companies are now building various versions of SMRs. One of them, Kairos Power, is constructing a demonstration reactor in Tennessee; IMEG is collaborating with HDR on the project. The facility is expected to be online in 2027 and will provide essential data on performance, safety, and cost, laying the groundwork for future deployment. Compared to traditional nuclear plants that take decades to bring online, Mike believes that the faster production and startup of SMRs will be key to addressing current and future energy needs. “SMRs are made to help with a problem we have right now, not a problem we're going to have in 30 years.”

In this episode, Simon Smith from Frazer-Nash Consultancy joins the Podbite series to discuss the realities of industrial decarbonization. The conversation explores the role of small modular reactors (SMRs), the opportunities and limits of existing carbon technologies, and the commercial hurdles facing heavy industry as it moves toward net zero.Simon shares both technical insights and industry perspectives from their roundtable discussion held at Decarb Connect UK in Manchester.Why Tune InHear how Frazer-Nash supports heavy industry with decarbonization assessments, emissions evaluations and technology integration strategies.Get the latest on carbon technologies: CCUS is gaining traction, hydrogen adoption faces price concerns, and direct air capture is starting to scale in the US.Explore the potential of Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) to integrate into industrial sites, supported by government planning reforms.Understand the commercial viability challenges: economics and lead times are the real barriers to deploying new technologies.Learn what industry leaders are saying: insights from Frazer-Nash's roundtable on practical challenges and real-world progress.Recorded live at Decarb Connect UK Summit, March 2025.Show links: -          Connect with Simon Smith and the team at Frazer-Nash Consultancy-          Follow Melissa Chew on LinkedIn and find how to get involved with the membership and work of Decarb ConnectWant to learn more about Decarb Connect?We provide insights and introductions that derisk decision-making and support industrial leaders in deploying decarbonization and low carbon product strategy. Our global membership platform, events and facilitated introductions support commercial decarb planning and business models around the world. Our clients include the most energy-intensive industrials from cement, metals and mining, glass, ceramics, chemicals, O&G and many more along with technology disruptors, investors and advisors. If you enjoyed this conversation, find out about our portfolio of events in US, Canada, UK and Europe – or explore our Decarbonisation Leaders Network (DLN), and learn why more than 200 members from the energy-intensive sectors have joined to share insights, meet partners who can accelerate their net zero plans and why it's the fastest growing network of its kind.     (00:00) - Introduction and background (00:43) - - How Frazer-Nash supports clients with decarbonization (01:13) - - Technology trends: carbon capture, hydrogen, and direct air capture (02:21) - - SMR roundtable discussion and government planning reforms (03:19) - - Industry interest and main concerns about SMR adoption (03:44) - - Business case challenges and carbon pricing (04:33) - - Key takeaways from Decarb Connect UK 2025 (05:05) - - Wrap up

Preview: Small Modular Reactors. Colleague Henry Sokolski comments on the quandary that the US is weighing export of the ability to construct what we just bombed in Iran. More tonight. 1890 TEHRAN

- FDA Advisory on Contaminated Shrimp (0:11) - Cesium Eliminator and Its Benefits (4:17) - Alternative Solutions and Warnings (12:59) - FDA's Role and Prussian Blue (23:50) - Additional Blue Dyes and Their Benefits (27:41) - Photo-Activated Nutrition and Fluorescence (33:49) - Health Ranger Store's Macaroni and Cheese (41:30) - Data Center Wars and Power Grid Vulnerabilities (49:05) - Modular Nuclear Reactors and Cold Fusion (1:14:45) - Government's Role in Energy Suppression (1:19:42) - Small Modular Reactors and Nuclear Power Advocacy (1:23:59) - Government Depopulation Agenda and Technological Advancements (1:28:17) - Human Extermination and Technological Singularity (1:36:32) - Economic Implications of Depopulation and Technological Advancements (1:48:13) - Interview with Tom Woods on Historical Narratives and Government Influence (1:49:06) - The Role of AI in the Future of Work and Human Society (2:37:16) - Impact of AI on Personal Services and Human Connection (2:38:43) - Historical Context and Human Identity (2:43:39) - AI in Agriculture and Decentralization (2:46:25) - Ethical and Privacy Concerns (2:51:02) - Future of AI and Human Reaction (2:53:56) For more updates, visit: http://www.brighteon.com/channel/hrreport NaturalNews videos would not be possible without you, as always we remain passionately dedicated to our mission of educating people all over the world on the subject of natural healing remedies and personal liberty (food freedom, medical freedom, the freedom of speech, etc.). Together, we're helping create a better world, with more honest food labeling, reduced chemical contamination, the avoidance of toxic heavy metals and vastly increased scientific transparency. ▶️ Every dollar you spend at the Health Ranger Store goes toward helping us achieve important science and content goals for humanity: https://www.healthrangerstore.com/ ▶️ Sign Up For Our Newsletter: https://www.naturalnews.com/Readerregistration.html ▶️ Brighteon: https://www.brighteon.com/channels/hrreport ▶️ Join Our Social Network: https://brighteon.social/@HealthRanger ▶️ Check In Stock Products at: https://PrepWithMike.com

Electricity demand is soaring, and some think the answer isn’t building bigger, but smaller. That’s the idea behind small modular reactors (SMRs): take a large-scale nuclear plant that’s hard to build, and shrink it down to something that’s more manageable, cheaper and easier to replicate. Instead of one huge nuclear plant, you build 10 small ones. Right now these kinds of small modular reactors are in the startup phase, with only two in commercial operation in Russia and China. So how viable is the business for these small modular reactors? And will SMRs ever become a scaled up solution for our energy needs? Rachel Slaybaugh joins Akshat Rathi on Zero to discuss. Explore further: What Are Small Nuclear Reactors and How Do SMRs Help Solve Climate Change? - Bloomberg Canada to Build $15 Billion Modular Nuclear Plant, First in G-7 - Bloomberg UK Selects Rolls-Royce to Build First Small Modular Reactors - Bloomberg China is Home to World's First Small Modular Nuclear Reactor Zero is a production of Bloomberg Green. Our producer is Oscar Boyd. Special thanks to Eleanor Harrison Dengate, Siobhan Wagner, Sommer Saadi and Mohsis Andam. Thoughts or suggestions? Email us at zeropod@bloomberg.net. For more coverage of climate change and solutions, visit https://www.bloomberg.com/green.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

U.S. per capita energy usage peaked in 1973. Since then? Flat. Meanwhile, China's per capita energy use has grown 9x.Today, AI, EVs, manufacturing, and data centers are driving demand for more electricity than ever—and our grid can't keep up.In this episode, a16z general partners David Ulevitch and Erin Price-Wright, along with investing partner Ryan McEntush from the American Dynamism team, join us to unpack:– How America's grid fell behind– Why we "forgot how to build" power infrastructure– The role of batteries, solar, nuclear, and software in reshaping the grid– How AI is both stressing and helping the system– What it'll take to build a more resilient, decentralized, and dynamic energy futureWhether you're a founder, policymaker, or just someone who wants their lights to stay on, this conversation covers what's broken—and how to fix it.Resources: Find David on X: https://x.com/daviduFind Erin on X: https://x.com/espricewrightFind Ryan on X: https://x.com/rmcentushTimestamps: 00:00 Introduction01:05 Challenges and Solutions for Modernizing the Grid 01:56 Decentralized Energy and Technological Innovations 02:34 Grid Capacity and Transformer Issues 04:10 The Role of AI and Software in Energy Management 04:55 Policy and Workforce Challenges 08:44 Texas vs. New York: A Tale of Two Grids 10:31 The Importance of Battery Technology 13:11 Balancing Energy Sources: Solar, Nuclear, and More 14:54 The Future of Energy Consumption and Grid Management 19:45 Wind Power: The Forgotten Energy Source 20:53 Challenges in Grid Monitoring and Communication 22:19 Load Forecasting and Weather Impact 23:49 Nuclear Energy: Current State and Future Prospects 26:44 Small Modular Reactors and Micro Reactors 30:55 Technological Innovations in Grid Management 35:41 The Role of AI in Regulatory Processes 41:39 National Security and the Electrical GridStay Updated: Let us know what you think: https://ratethispodcast.com/a16zFind a16z on Twitter: https://twitter.com/a16zFind a16z on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/a16zSubscribe on your favorite podcast app: https://a16z.simplecast.com/Follow our host: https://x.com/eriktorenbergPlease note that the content here is for informational purposes only; should NOT be taken as legal, business, tax, or investment advice or be used to evaluate any investment or security; and is not directed at any investors or potential investors in any a16z fund. a16z and its affiliates may maintain investments in the companies discussed. For more details please see a16z.com/disclosures.

In today' podcast we are focusing on the UK's new nuclear power ambitions and specifically, exploring the Sizewell C project.As I said a few weeks ago on the podcast, it's perhaps one of the most significant moments for the UK's nuclear industry in over a generation.Last month, the government announced a multi-billion investment to drive forward this ambition with £14.2 billion committed to accelerate construction of the Sizewell C project. Alongside this comes backing for Small Modular Reactors and investment in fusion research - all part of a landmark commitment to clean energy, jobs, and long-term energy security. So the message is clear: this is the start of what the government calls a "golden age of nuclear." Discuss.Well Sizewell C certainly sits at the heart of this new ambition - a twin-reactor power station on the Suffolk coast - a carbon copy of the Hinkley Point C reactor now under construction in Somerset – sitting alongside the Sizewell B station which was, of course,  intended as the start of the last nuclear golden age 30 years ago.When operational in the mid 2030s, Sizewell C will power six million homes with low-carbon energy for the next 60 plus years as the UK's first fully British-owned nuclear project in decades – and apparently a keystone in delivering both net zero energy and national resilience. But ambition is just the beginning of course. Turning that vision into reality will mean overcoming a long list of challenges — from regulatory hurdles and construction risk, to workforce capacity and public trust.Joining me today to unpack all of this is Julia Pyke, Managing Director of the Sizewell C project. Lot's to talk about when it comes to identifying what the government's investment really means in practice and how Sizewell C fits into the wider nuclear revival.And of course, what it will take to deliver this project on time, on budget. So let's crack on…ResourcesSizewell C project websiteGovernment press release on Sizewell CHinkley Point C websiteGreat British Energy - NuclearNuclear Industry Association release on nuclear investment The Stewart Review: The HS2 Experience

US REP JAMIE RASKIN & THE ATTACK ON US DEMOCRACY & ECOLOGY We begin GREEP Zoom #229 with citations for  “The Choreography of War” by our Poet Laureate MIMI GERMAN, whose latest poem is compacted into a brilliant three lines. Green Party Presidential nominee HOWIE HAWKINS discusses the nitty-gritties of Ranked Choice Voting & instant runoff. The great MARIANNE WILLIAMSON gives us a brief hello & a promise to come visit us again soon. Beyond Nuclear's KEVIN KAMPS reminds us about how powerful is the rise of renewables worldwide along with the demise of nuke power. Co-host MIKE HERSH gives us a stellar introduction for US REP JAMIE RASKIN. Rep. Raskin provides a brief excursion into the dire damage being done to our electoral system through the widespread assault on the Voting Rights Act, emphasizing the powerful impact of the No Kings Day marches.. The great RAY MCCLENDON of the Georgia-based Communities United for Justice connects with Rep. Raskin, sharing concerns about the mass disenfranchisement being imposed on the national electorate. In response Rep. Raskin warns of the anti-democracy provisions of the SAVE Act, aiming to keep millions of women from voting. Progressive Democrats of America's great Executive Director ALAN MINSKY emphasizes that Progressive activists are the true patriots. Rep. Raskin argues that the Founders' legacies are being assaulted because of their timeless commitment to democracy. A request for help comes from MAYOR HEIDE LAMPERT of Waldport, Oregon, who proclaims herself to be a Warrior for Democracy in the face of a fascist assault. Howie Hawkins & Kevin Kamps chime in with demands for real democracy & an end to subsidies for nuke power. Agricultural activist legend RUDY ARREDONDO warns of the dismemberment of the US Department of Agriculture & the breaking federal commitments to American farming. Rep. Raskin supports Rudy by underscoring the damage being done by ICE raids to the agricultural workers and the farms that depend on them. Green activist HEIDI VERTHALLER plugs for renewables and asks Jamie if he will run for president, to which Rep. Raskin answers in the affirmative. We hear from DONALD SMITH about a book called UNCHECKED that blames Nancy Pelosi for the failure of the impeachments of Trump. LA's JOHN SEELEY supports rank choice voting, but warns against it in the final NYC election. Frequent commentator NICOLE UNG warns that Amazon, Microsoft, Facebook et. al. are unifying for more nuke power. From MYLA RESON we hear of New York Lieutenant Governor Antonio DelGado, who opposes nuke power. Minnesotan HEDY TRIPP calls in from Malaysia to wonder about the threat to have NY Mayoral candidate Mamdani deported. Engineer STEVE CARUSO warns that the threat to de-naturalize would-be Mayor  Mamdani is being used nationwide. Ohio eco-activist VINA COLLEY illuminates the push for Small Modular Reactors' horrendous waste & Trump's sinister mis-use of radiation victims while slashing their compensation. Phone activist NINA SINGER urges everyone to call their Senators about the Big Bill and the destruction of the Everglades. No Nukes legend KARL GROSSMAN talks about the importance of meeting with a NY Governor candidate who's against nuke power. An emphasis for “boots on the ground comes from HOWIE DUIT. KPFK Board Chair TATANKA BRICCA emphasizes the long history of farmworker activism in CA... and its forever impact.  Frequent GREEPster DONALD SMITH introduces us to the work on nuke waste at Hanford coming from Jerry Politt, who we'll track down…. But in honor of Independence weekend, we will not meet on July 7….so please celebrate & work for at least two more centuries of American democracy.     

Nuclear is back, baby! But there's a catch: the world is hungry for uranium, and we're running short. Turns out, countries like China, India, and Saudi Arabia aren't waiting around—they're ramping up reactors faster than you can say "energy crisis." Small Modular Reactors (think mini but mighty) could totally flip the script on how we power cities, AI data centers, and your neighborhood coffee shop. Our guest knows the ins and outs of uranium investments, the weird logistics of mining, and why nuclear might just be the unsung hero of clean energy, controversial, sure, but impossible to ignore.Digital Wildcatters brings the energy community together through events, cutting-edge content, and powerful tools. Join our online community at collide.io. Engage with experts, level up your career, and ask Collide AI your toughest technical questions.Click here to watch a video of this episode. Click here to view the episode transcript. 00:00 - Intro02:06 - What is Uranium: Basics and Importance07:04 - Uranium Production Today: Current Trends08:00 - Uranium Enrichment: Process and Techniques12:39 - Uranium Market: Analysis and Insights17:27 - Cost Inflation: Impact on Uranium Industry20:51 - Talent Drain: Challenges in the Sector23:08 - Nuclear Energy Demand: Future Projections27:07 - Small Modular Reactors (SMRs): Innovations in Nuclear31:50 - Uranium's Role in the Energy Sector: Key Contributions37:48 - Uranium's Role in the Military: Strategic Importance40:13 - How to Invest in Uranium: Tips and Strategies47:50 - Who Should Call You: Networking in the Industry48:35 - What About the Solar Panels: Comparing Energy Sources50:20 - What About the Nat Gas Guys: Industry Comparisons51:18 - Eric's Final Thoughts: Closing Insightshttps://www.instagram.com/digitalwildcattershttps://www.tiktok.com/@digitalwildcattershttps://www.facebook.com/digitalwildcattershttps://www.linkedin.com/company/digitalwildcattershttps://twitter.com/DWildcattershttps://www.youtube.com/@digitalwildcatters

On today's episode John leans on his year of experience working in the nuclear industry to provide an overview of the market movers in SMR space. Companies discussed: NuScale Power X-Energy Kairos Power TerraPower Holtec International Westinghouse OKLO None of this is investment advice. Do your own research. Consult with your financial professional. Subscribe to John's Finding Freedom Show solo feed to listen to “Pursuit of Freedom,” which is a new podcast series where John shares the highs and lows of his entrepreneurial journey. Listen and Subscribe on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. Follow the Lions of Liberty: Twitter Rumble YouTube Instagram Telegram Get access to all of our bonus audio content, livestreams, behind-the-scenes segments and more for as little as $5 per month by joining the Lions of Liberty Pride on Patreon OR support us on Locals! Check out our merchandise at the Lions of Liberty Store for all of our awesome t-shirts, mugs and hats! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

On today's episode John leans on his year of experience working in the nuclear industry to provide an overview of the market movers in SMR space. Companies discussed: NuScale Power X-Energy Kairos Power TerraPower Holtec International Westinghouse OKLO None of this is investment advice. Do your own research. Consult with your financial professional. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

On today's episode John leans on his year of experience working in the nuclear industry to provide an overview of the market movers in SMR space. Companies discussed: NuScale Power X-Energy Kairos Power TerraPower Holtec International Westinghouse OKLO None of this is investment advice. Do your own research. Consult with your financial professional. Subscribe to John's Finding Freedom Show solo feed to listen to “Pursuit of Freedom,” which is a new podcast series where John shares the highs and lows of his entrepreneurial journey. Listen and Subscribe on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. Follow the Lions of Liberty: Twitter Rumble YouTube Instagram Telegram Get access to all of our bonus audio content, livestreams, behind-the-scenes segments and more for as little as $5 per month by joining the Lions of Liberty Pride on Patreon OR support us on Locals! Check out our merchandise at the Lions of Liberty Store for all of our awesome t-shirts, mugs and hats! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In this edition of Our Burning Planet on CapeTalk’s Afternoon Drive, Graeme Raubenheimer is joined by environmental journalist Ethan van Diemen to unpack Eskom’s controversial new direction for South Africa’s coal-fired power stations. Departing from its original Just Energy Transition (JET) commitments, Eskom is now exploring plans to repurpose ageing coal plants to run on gas, nuclear, or even so-called 'clean coal' technology.  Afternoon Drive with John Maytham is the late afternoon show on CapeTalk. Presenter John Maytham is an actor and author-turned-talk radio veteran and seasoned journalist. His show serves a round-up of local and international news coupled with the latest in business, sport, traffic and weather. The host’s eclectic interests mean the program often surprises the audience with intriguing book reviews and inspiring interviews profiling artists. A daily highlight is Rapid Fire, just after 5:30 pm. CapeTalk fans call in, in an attempt to stump the presenter with their general knowledge questions. Another firm favourite is the humorous Thursday crossing with award-winning journalist Rebecca Davis, called “Plan B”. Thank you for listening to a podcast from Afternoon Drive with John Maytham Listen live – Afternoon Drive with John Maytham is broadcast weekdays between 15:00 and 18:00 (SA Time) https://www.primediaplus.com/station/capetalk Find all the catch-up podcasts here https://www.primediaplus.com/capetalk/afternoon-drive-with-john-maytham/audio-podcasts/afternoon-drive-with-john-maytham/ Subscribe to the CapeTalk daily and weekly newsletters https://www.primediaplus.com/competitions/newsletter-subscription/ Follow us on social media: CapeTalk on Facebook: www.facebook.com/CapeTalk   CapeTalk on TikTok: www.tiktok.com/@capetalk   CapeTalk on Instagram: www.instagram.com/capetalkza  CapeTalk on X: www.x.com/CapeTalk  CapeTalk on YouTube: www.youtube.com/@CapeTalk567  See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Join CFC's Brian Sloboda to learn how factory-built and scalable small modular reactors could provide utility-scale baseload power as licensing is modernized and the sector receives substantial U.S. investment. Find out what electric cooperatives need to know today.

In this episode of NUCLECAST, host Adam Lowther engages with Dr. Robert Kittinger to discuss various aspects of nuclear policy, including the importance of tritium production, the role of small modular reactors in military applications, and the interconnectedness of nuclear energy and weapons. They explore the implications of denuclearization and the need for a dedicated supply chain for nuclear components, while also addressing the historical context of nuclear deterrence and its significance in maintaining global peace.Dr. Kittinger, is a Senior Fellow at the National Institute for Deterrence Studies (NIDS). He spent 10 years at Sandia National Laboratories, culminating in the Nuclear Threat Science department and working in Nuclear Emergency Support and Counterterrorism & Counter-Proliferation (CTCP). During his time at Sandia, he was also a 2017 graduate of the prestigious Weapon Intern Program (WIP).Before joining Sandia, Dr. Kittinger spent over five years as a civilian in the U.S. Navy and was part of a five-person tech startup, BookLamp, which was acquired by Apple in 2013. Following his tenure at Sandia, he served as a senior researcher at Amazon and currently holds the role of Chief Research Officer at a MedTech company.Chapters00:00 Introduction to NUCLECAST and Guest Introduction01:14 Presidential Address and Nuclear Policy Discussion03:40 Tritium Production and Its Importance12:10 Challenges in Nuclear Supply Chain and Future Needs13:01 Small Modular Reactors and Their Military Applications18:04 Nuclear Energy and Weapons Interconnection20:31 Denuclearization and Global Peace Perspectives28:50 Wishes for the Future of Nuclear Energy and DeterrenceSocials:Follow on Twitter at @NucleCastFollow on LinkedIn: https://linkedin.com/company/nuclecastpodcastSubscribe RSS Feed: https://rss.com/podcasts/nuclecast-podcast/Rate: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/nuclecast/id1644921278Email comments and topic/guest suggestions to NucleCast@anwadeter.org

Interview with Adam Russell; News Items: Congestion Pricing, AI Therapists, Redefining Dyslexia, Small Modular Reactors for Cargo Ships; Who's That Noisy; Science or Fiction

Interview with Adam Russell; News Items: Congestion Pricing, AI Therapists, Redefining Dyslexia, Small Modular Reactors for Cargo Ships; Who's That Noisy; Science or Fiction

Is nuclear power the key to sustainability? With data centers consuming massive amounts of energy, can we keep up? Neil deGrasse Tyson, Gary O'Reilly & Paul Mecurio discuss the physics, safety, and future of nuclear reactors in a world of increasing power demands with nuclear engineer Kathryn Huff.NOTE: StarTalk+ Patrons can listen to this entire episode commercial-free here: https://startalkmedia.com/show/solving-ais-energy-problem-with-kathryn-huff/Thanks to our Patrons Diokindacute, Wheeler Weise, coryb440, Tim Itoi, Curiosidad científica podcast, Deborah Wales, nahar najjar, Scott Jewell, richard ravelo, Samuel Tomka, zackery Cool, Alexis Schad, Sean Smith, KEO LYPENG, Simon Tang, Thomas Coppola, Joseph, Monchelle Hicks, Paul Nowosielcki, Andrei Sirbu, bgbng, Neil Juanillo, Neal Beaton, Vic, PENE WILSON, Brendan Gombosi, Chad Jubyna, Jacob Narr, Mike, Nick H. is AllDamgeNoCntrol, Suliman, and Christoph Hermann for supporting us this week. Subscribe to SiriusXM Podcasts+ to listen to new episodes of StarTalk Radio ad-free and a whole week early.Start a free trial now on Apple Podcasts or by visiting siriusxm.com/podcastsplus.

The exponential growth of data center energy demand, particularly driven by advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI), has emerged as one of the most pressing challenges for energy infrastructure globally.  However, existing grid infrastructure is increasingly constrained, particularly in regions with concentrated data center activity. Transmission bottlenecks, aging infrastructure, and long timelines for grid upgrades present significant challenges for meeting this explosive demand. Podcast takeaways: How Microgrids, powered by Distributed Energy Resources (DERs) offer a promising solution by reducing dependency on centralized grids, integrating generation from multiple fuels and storage, and providing load flexibility.  The benefits of a strategy that includes and prepares for Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) when they become commercially available. The immediate and long-term benefits of this multi-year approach through real-world data center examples in Santa Clara, California and Ashburn, Virginia, USA  How to optimize your energy investments, reduce OPEX costs by 60-80%, and significantly reduce CO₂ emissions by using Xendee's advanced Microgrid Modeling platform to design the right site-specific multi-year strategy.

PREVIEW: NUCLEAR POWER: ROSATOM's global supremacy; Argentina seeking nuclear plant investors; Small Modular Reactors for AI dreams. With Henry Sokolski, Nonproliferation Policy Education Center. https://www.ft.com/content/4e78c20a-dad8-4ce5-b2c9-90106c5bea31?accessToken=zwAGKkLI7cIokc9OeMIK2thM5dOyyZAQbFvqMQ.MEYCIQCGZITGGX4Ejbvnc_Ea5xjkOrAuVd2TF2QBvPcLX5jnkQIhAP1m0WDRMWSDIpDvDg2FqN0r2HjqC8S-Q515pOF0m0gV&sharetype=gift&token=fd642934-4991-4fdf-971d-3acf0009a8db https://www.ft.com/content/6e0ad76b-02e8-447d-afe1-da41be52d708?accessToken=zwAGKkLJ3qoIkc9uCtdrAuhEfdOv4dpBvlLXCA.MEUCIQDKWTCrAzLPMy5Py4dODQ8LNenk3JQxbZ9Hx1BHMkUubwIgOjid3A-JHEYqfRg2R8212h3RazynUyEoiPDmu872fj4&sharetype=gift&token=5bb7003b-3178-47d3-8d2d-7ef12a340e01 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oklo_Inc. 1951

Bryan Armour, director of passive strategies research for North America for Morningstar Research Services, talks about the best way for most retail investors to leverage and which leveraged ETFs look promising. Travis Miller, strategist for Morningstar Research Services, discusses how tech companies are looking to nuclear energy to fuel data centers' surging demand.Why Leverage Has a Debatable Reputation in InvestingVolatility Drag and Leveraged ETFsWhy Does Leverage Kill ETFs?What Are ETPs?A Better Way for Investors to Use Leverage in Their PortfolioHow Can Investors Add Leverage to Their Portfolio Without Volatility Drag?Costs of Leveraged ETFsHow Most Investors Should Gain Exposure to LeverageDo Leveraged ETFs Show Promise?What's Coming Up in the Markets?How Much Energy Does a Data Center Need to Run?Why Small Modular Reactors Could Be Key to Powering Data CentersAre Carbon-Free Pledges Driving Companies Toward Nuclear Energy?Which Utilities Companies Are Next to Sign Data Center Deals?Is This Shift Toward Nuclear Energy Larger Than Just AI?What to Look for in Utilities Companies' EarningsUtilities Stock Picks Read about topics from this episode.  Subscribe to Morningstar's ETFInvestor Newsletter. The AI Revolution Is Ready to Power Up. It Just Needs Electricity Utilities: Falling Interest Rates, Growth Outlook Boosting Stocks What to watch from Morningstar.Apple Earnings Are on Deck. Will Apple Intelligence Help Drive iPhone Sales? Is Your Portfolio Built to Withstand a Market Rotation? Inherited IRA Rules: What You Need to Know Before 2025How to Find the Best Health Savings Account Read what our team is writing:Bryan Armour Travis Miller Ivanna Hampton Follow us on social media.Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/MorningstarInc/X: https://x.com/MorningstarIncInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/morningstar... LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/5161/

Do you prefer multistory episodes, single story episodes, or a mix? Let us know! In this episode of Discover Daily, we begin with a discussion of TikTok's shift towards AI-driven content moderation, which has raised concerns about job displacement and the effectiveness of automated systems in understanding cultural nuances. The hosts then delve into Google's groundbreaking deal with Kairos Power to acquire nuclear energy from small modular reactors (SMRs) for powering its data centers, a move that reflects a growing trend among tech giants to embrace nuclear power for meeting their increasing energy demands while reducing carbon emissions.The episode's main focus is on the expansion of Operation Olympic Defender, a U.S.-led multinational space defense initiative that France and Germany have recently joined. The hosts explain how this collaboration aims to enhance space security by optimizing space operations, improving mission assurance, strengthening deterrence against hostile actors, and reducing orbital debris. They discuss the importance of Space Domain Awareness (SDA) in monitoring potential threats, such as anti-satellite weapons being developed by China and Russia, and highlight the role of advanced radar systems and sensors contributed by participating nations.From Perplexity's Discover Feed:https://www.perplexity.ai/page/tiktok-pivots-to-ai-moderators-p1G35bAaSricJbjI4eTfDQhttps://www.perplexity.ai/page/google-signs-nuclear-deal-RnngGm_MRQipbVwi3oYyCAhttps://www.perplexity.ai/page/olympic-defender-space-warfigh-.pc4DnVmRQ6CrtjtXPnK1gPerplexity is the fastest and most powerful way to search the web. Perplexity crawls the web and curates the most relevant and up-to-date sources (from academic papers to Reddit threads) to create the perfect response to any question or topic you're interested in. Take the world's knowledge with you anywhere. Available on iOS and Android Join our growing Discord community for the latest updates and exclusive content. Follow us on: Instagram Threads X (Twitter) YouTube Linkedin

#Nuclear Weapons: Small Modular Reactors for sale and the risk of bomb-making HALEU. Henry Sokolski, Nonproliferation Policy Education Center. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.ado8693 1953 ATOMIC CANNON TRANSPORT

PREVIEW-#NPEC: #NUCLEAR: In conversation with colleague Henry Sokolski about the costs and risks of nuclear power plants -- re NuScale that builds small modular reactors, first rate technology, and yet has not yet found success in the marketplace -- and what is the alternative to investors? More later. 1979 Three Mile Island