Podcasts about ilc

Audio from our live panel on Saturday, July 25 at Woodbine where we go deeper on Varn & Tutt's new book The People Are Not One, starting with some normie vs. Marxist LARPing and ending with a spirited Q&A featuring Ross Wolfe, Greg Butler, Platypus, Donald Parkinson, and more! For the full episode, support the show at http://patreon.com/c/thiswreckageThe event was sponsored by ILC of NYC Song: Run the Jewels - Goonies vs. E.T.

You know your stuff. You've solved the exact problem your clients are stuck in. So why does a piece of paper from someone else's certification program still feel like the missing piece?In this episode, Adam Roach and Jess Webber take on certifications directly, and they don't hold back. Adam opens with a blunt take: certifications build authority that isn't actually yours. Jess agrees, pulling from her background in education, where she had to certify across grade levels and subjects just to be allowed to teach, even though the certificate never measured whether she was actually good at it.The conversation moves quickly from certifications into something bigger: the difference between framework and authority. Adam draws a comparison to buying a blueprint to build a house. Paying for a framework to build your coaching business makes sense. But the blueprint isn't your authority. Your authority is what Adam calls your "problem solution cycle," the actual life and business problems you've already lived through and solved. Jess extends the idea with her own analogy: walking into a room as an experienced plumber and being handed a welder's toolkit. You can learn the tools, but that doesn't make welding your authority.Both hosts get personal here. Adam shares the story of chasing a John Maxwell certification early in his leadership career and feeling like an imposter performing someone else's material. Jess talks about scrapping an entire brand she built before Big Ideas Made Simple, once she realized she was borrowing authority instead of standing in her own.What you'll learn:Why a certification can build your knowledge without ever becoming your authorityThe difference between "framework buying" and borrowed authorityHow to spot borrowed authority in the way someone introduces themselvesWhy high achievers are especially prone to what Adam calls an "identity crisis"What actually builds client trust, and why it has nothing to do with letters after your nameWhy dependent coaching models create the same borrowed-authority trap as certificationsHow shifting from "mirror" thinking to "window" thinking changes the way you show up publiclyThe big idea in this episode is simple but hard to sit with: nobody is buying your certificate. They're buying the problem you've already solved and the clarity you can hand them because of it. The moment you lead with a credential instead of your lived experience, you're telling people, even if you don't mean to, that you don't fully trust yourself yet.Notable quote:"Nobody is buying your piece of paper on the wall. They're buying your experience and your expertise in the things that you've lived and the things that you've overcome." — Jess WebberResources mentioned:I Love Coaching Co. Sellable Offer Challenge and the four Ps pedestal framework referenced from the challengeThe REAL Coach Blueprintilovecoachingco.comInstagram: @ilovecoachingco / @adamrroach / @thejesswebberYouTube: youtube.com/@ilovecoachingcoTimestamps:[00:00] Intro: "Certifications suck" [00:46] Jess's education background and the certification trap [02:03] Framework buying versus authority: the blueprint analogy [03:10] Certifications as an imposter-syndrome crutch [05:07] The plumber and welder analogy [06:14] Adam's John Maxwell certification story [07:38] Certifications as "participation trophies" [09:05] You've already been certified by life [13:00] Jess on scrapping her old brand and building Big Ideas Made Simple [14:08] Why borrowed authority takes longer to earn trust [17:04] How people introduce themselves reveals borrowed authority [18:04] High achievers and "identity crisis" [20:02] Why credentials don't automatically build trust [23:02] Dependent coaching models and borrowed brand authority [24:11] Mirror versus window: nobody cares about you [25:46] How to tell if your content is actually landing [28:01] Wrap-up and what's coming in Part 5Join the community:Ready to build a coaching business you're proud of, on your own authority instead of someone else's? The ILC community is where coaches go to stop guessing and start growing. ilovecoachingco.com

You've got clients on your calendar right now who don't actually feel like a fit. Maybe you like them fine, maybe the check clears, but something about the work feels harder than it should. If you've ever caught yourself hoping a client doesn't cancel instead of hoping they book again, this episode is for you.Adam and Jess are three episodes deep into their "Is This Actually Yours?" series, and this one turns the lens on the client sitting across from you. Adam opens with his own story of coaching an avatar he'd inherited from a past container, the recruiters and leaders he was "supposed" to coach because that's who he'd always coached, whether or not there was any real passion behind it. Jess flips the coin and names the other version of this trap: coaches who build their avatar around who they want to become someday instead of who they've actually gotten results for. Both point to the same root problem. When you coach from an identity that isn't fully yours, whether inherited or aspirational, the mismatch shows up in your calendar.The conversation builds toward the Avatar Fit Filter, three questions Adam and Jess use to audit a client roster: do you like them, can you and will you help them with the specific outcome you've defined, and can they actually afford you. Jess adds a bonus filter on top: do your current clients reflect who you are at your best, or who you were willing to settle for before you had confidence in your pricing and your process.What you'll learn:Why coaching to an old professional identity keeps you stuck with the wrong clientsThe difference between inheriting an avatar and reaching for one you haven't earned yetThe three-question Avatar Fit Filter for auditing your current rosterWhy discounting your price is usually a sign you've got the wrong client, not the wrong priceJess's BEAT method (Break, Examine, Audit, Tune) for slowing down before you scaleA red light, green light exercise for your calendar that makes the wrong clients easier to spotWhy "inviting" beats "convincing" every time you're signing a new clientThe big idea here is simple but uncomfortable: your calendar is currently full of information about what you actually believe about your business, whether or not that matches what you'd say out loud. Every client you're afraid to lose, chasing to close, or discounting for is telling you something about a mismatch between your defined outcome and who you're actually letting onto your calendar. The fix isn't dramatic. It's an audit, not a demolition.Notable quote: "If you ever have to feel like you're selling or convincing, it's not the right client." — Adam RoachResources mentioned:Rory Vaden (referenced as a recurring influence on positioning and strategic client selection)Donald Miller's jar and label metaphor (referenced, though Adam misremembered the exact line, which Jess corrected: you cannot read the label from inside the jar)Graham Cochrane's "I will invite you, but I'm not gonna chase you" framingILC community: ilovecoachingco.comInstagram: @ilovecoachingco / @adamrroach / @thejesswebberYouTube: youtube.com/@ilovecoachingcoTimestamps: [00:00] Intro: Part 3 of 5, is the avatar actually yours [01:10] Why this is the most timely conversation in their world right now [02:29] Coaching to an old identity: Adam's "that guy that built" story [06:00] The "founder" title trend and inherited containers [07:33] Peeling off borrowed labels, the jar and label metaphor [10:36] Jess's BEAT method: slow down to speed up [11:42] The three-question Avatar Fit Filter [13:55] Naming the framework and why outcome-fit matters more than liking someone [16:15] Discounting price as a signal you have the wrong client [18:48] The red light, green light calendar exercise [20:55] Whys vs. whos vs. whats [22:26] Wrap-up and where to find moreReady to build a coaching business you're proud of? The ILC community is where coaches go to stop guessing and start growing. ilovecoachingco.com/discover

Američani so na začetku meseca praznovali 250 let samostojnosti. Ko so se pred četrt stoletja uprli britanski kroni, so svojo odločitev za osamosvojitev filozofsko utemeljili v Deklaraciji o neodvisnosti, kjer so med drugim zapisali, da smo vsi ljudje enakopravni in da ima prav vsakdo pravico do življenja, svobode ter zasledovanja sreče. To je gotovo smela, revolucionarna misel, ki že dolgo razgibava borce za svobodo, enakost in bratstvo po vsem svetu. Nerodno pa je, da Američanom samim potem ni uspelo ustvariti družbe, ki bi bila zares na ravni idealov, izraženih v Deklaraciji. Zakaj neki ne? O vlogi, ki so jo ZDA doslej igrale v svetovni zgodovini, pa tudi o izzivih in težavah, s katerimi se Amerika sooča danes, vnovič v tokratnem Studiu ob 17-ih. Gostje: dr. Blaž Kosovel, kulturolog; dr. Irena Šumi, antropologinja; dr. Blaž Vrečko Ilc, politolog.

Audio from June 27, 2026 ILC of NYC panel and town hall event for pride month on LGBTQ workers self-organizing, past and present. Watch and subscribe on ILC's Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dVfkabZCR04&t=4sWith the increase in anti-LGBTQ (and especially anti-trans) sentiment among American legislators, the Independent Labor Club views it as pressing to host a public conversation on issues facing LGBTQ workers. We are inviting historians and organizers in order to discuss the history of autonomous struggles and what lessons can the working class at large learn from their efforts. Featured Panelists: Maggie Schreiner (CUNY Grad Center) Garrison Davis (It Could Happen Here) April M. (Reform and Revolution DSA) Carla González (CUNY Grad Center) Moderated by Matt Brim (College of Staten Island)

You don't need a bigger following. You need one real conversation with the right person.That's the uncomfortable truth new coaches avoid, because it's easier to post another Instagram Reel than to sit across from someone and ask what they're actually struggling with. Adam sits down with Candy Motzek, a coach for coaches who left a high-pressure corporate leadership role (and a severe burnout that once made her forget her own phone number) to build a business helping professionals and senior leaders become coaches without quitting their identity in the process.Candy's story doesn't start with a business plan. It starts on a cruise ship headed toward Cape Horn, terrified of waters she'd built up in her head as dangerous, only to sail through them flat calm and sunny. That single moment cracked open a bigger question: how many other things had she talked herself out of before ever testing whether the fear was real? Two weeks later she was in her first coach training.What makes this conversation useful isn't the origin story, though. It's what Candy does with new coaches once they've made the leap. She doesn't send them straight to social media. She has them run a research project or survey with the exact people they want as clients, which does two things at once: it hands the new coach language and authority they didn't have to invent, and it puts them in direct conversation with future clients before they've built anything to sell.What you'll learn:Why the fear you're avoiding is usually bigger in your head than in reality, and how to test it instead of managing around itHow to build authority as a brand new coach using research conversations and surveys instead of a followingWhy one-on-one clients are the right starting point before group programs or mastermindsThe real math behind coaching pricing, and why your old salary has nothing to do with what you should chargeWhy "coach goes first" isn't a slogan, it's the actual reason coaches need coachesHow to reconnect with what you loved before titles and responsibility buried itCandy's clearest reframe: most new coaches think they need permission or visibility before anyone will pay them. What actually signs clients is a real, curious conversation with someone who already trusts you, which means the exposure-first approach most new coaches default to is solving the wrong problem entirely.Notable quote:"If you believe that people should pay you to be a coach, then you should be investing in your own coaching too." — Candy MotzekGuest bio:Candy Motzek is a coach for coaches who helps professionals and senior leaders build coaching businesses without abandoning their existing expertise. She hosts the podcast She Coaches Coaches and previously spent years in corporate leadership as an engineer before a severe burnout redirected her path.Resources mentioned:She Coaches Coaches podcast (Candy Motzek's show)Candy's free 8-part mini training: candysfreegift.comILC community: ilovecoachingco.comInstagram: @ilovecoachingco / @adamrroach / @thejesswebberYouTube: youtube.com/@ilovecoachingcoTimestamps:[00:00] Intro, welcoming Candy[00:39] Candy's origin story: corporate leadership to coaching[02:53] The burnout that made her forget her own phone number[06:02] The Antarctica cruise and the fear that wasn't real[08:07] Coaching professionals and senior leaders through the "real job" stigma[12:44] Finding purpose: "coming home to who you are"[15:10] Building authority through research conversations and surveys[17:17] How to reconnect with what lights you up[19:36] Why one-on-one comes before group coaching[23:18] Pricing: business owner math vs. employee wage[26:49] Why coaches need coaches[29:17] Where to find Candy: She Coaches Coaches + free giftJoin the community:Ready to build a coaching business you're proud of? The ILC community is where coaches go to stop guessing and start growing. ilovecoachingco.com/discover

You can spend years building a coaching business on language that was never yours to begin with. You absorbed it from the program you joined, the mentor you followed, the framework you bought — and because it worked for them, you kept using it. The problem isn't that you learned from someone else. The problem is that you never stopped to check whether what you're saying is actually what you believe. That's what this episode is about. Adam and Jess kick off a new five-part series by naming the thing nobody in the coaching industry wants to say out loud: a lot of coaches are operating inside someone else's identity. Not because they're dishonest, but because borrowing confidence from a borrowed message feels safer than standing fully in your own. And it works, right up until the moment it doesn't, and your audience can feel the gap between what you're saying and who you actually are. The conversation moves between Adam's experience as a tennis coach (where he created his now-legendary "armed forces forehand" framing for full-body swing technique) and Jess's background as a classroom educator, where she learned early that the difference between teaching and regurgitating is whether you actually own the material. Both threads land in the same place: when the messaging is yours, trust builds. When it isn't, people can feel it, even if they can't name it. What you'll take away from this episode:Why borrowing someone else's message means borrowing someone else's belief — and why that shows up more than you think The difference between learning from a framework and actually owning one (there's a specific moment the transition happens, and most coaches skip it) How the information age gave way to the implementation age, and what that means for how you position yourself now Why the AI era is accelerating a crisis of authenticity — and how coaches who do the identity work will be the ones people trust What "AI slop" actually signals to your audience and how to make sure your messaging doesn't read like it A simple reframe: leverage every tool you have to become more human, not less The tactical next step: slowing down to audit your language before you accelerate your growth The Main Idea:Most coaches aren't lacking content or strategy. They're lacking language that's actually theirs. And until you sit down and identify which parts of your messaging fit and which parts belong to someone else's worldview, you'll keep feeling like you're performing a version of coaching instead of living it. The coaches who break through are the ones who did the slow, uncomfortable work of converting borrowed language into owned belief. Notable Quote:"Leverage the tools to be more human." — Jess Webber Resources Mentioned:Dan Henry's course (referenced as an example of learning a framework, then building your own — not an endorsement) Graham Cochrane's concept of a "premise" as a universal belief in your space The ILC Blueprint: ILC's proprietary methodology for building a process that's uniquely yours ILC community and events: ilovecoachingco.com Instagram: @ilovecoachingco / @adamrroach / @thejesswebber YouTube: youtube.com/@ilovecoachingco Join the Community:If this hit and you're ready to stop operating inside someone else's framework, this is exactly what ILC is built for. Challenges, intensives, membership — find what fits where you are right now at ilovecoachingco.com.

You already know your stuff. You've built the credentials, done the work, put in the hours. So why does it still feel shaky the moment someone challenges you, doubts you, or the moment you step into a space you haven't occupied before?This conversation with Nassim Ebrahimi is not a motivation talk. It's a masterclass on what confidence actually is, where it comes from, and why so many coaches and athletes are building it on the wrong foundation.Nassim came from one of the most linear, high-achievement career paths you'll find, earning a psychology background (neurobiology, physiology, developmental psych) and rising to one of the youngest vice presidencies in her state. Then COVID hit, and instead of taking the next logical step toward a college presidency, she stopped. She sat in the discomfort of not knowing what was next. And from that pause, an entirely different career emerged, one grounded in mental performance coaching for athletes, executives, and coaches who want to stop cracking under pressure.Adam and Nassim cover a lot of ground in Part 1 of this two-part conversation, including the emotional reality of a major career pivot, why your title is not your identity, and a surprisingly simple equation for building confidence that doesn't depend on everything going right.What you'll learn from this conversation:Why the first day after a major life pivot is the hardest one (and what to actually do with it)How Nassim defines mental toughness, and why it has nothing to do with hiding your emotionsThe exact confidence equation she coaches athletes and executives with: Confidence = Trusting Your Skills + Owning Your RoleWhy unshakable confidence isn't about staying at a constant high, it's about knowing which variable to lean into when one dropsHow she went from volunteering at her daughter's soccer practice to coaching pro athletes (and why the transition was less random than it looks)What coaches can learn from the way athletes handle adversity, and vice versaWhat Adam means when he says "borrowing confidence" from your coach, and why authentic confidence is the only kind worth borrowingThe big idea:Confidence is not a fixed character trait. It's a math problem. Nassim teaches it as an equation: trust your skills plus own your role. When one side of that equation dips (as it will, because you're human), you lean harder on the other side to keep the whole structure stable. That's not a mindset hack. That's a system. And for coaches who work with athletes, clients, or anyone in transition, this reframe changes what coaching confidence actually looks like in practice.Notable Quote:"Mental toughness brings mental clarity. If you can keep your physiology, your language, and your focus productive simultaneously, that is a stronger mind." -- Nassim EbrahimiGuest Bio:Nassim Ebrahimi is a mental performance coach, former higher-education executive, and founder of Becoming My Stronger Me. She coaches athletes from youth to professional level, executives in transition, and coaches looking to integrate mental performance techniques into their work. She's also the author of The Stronger Mind, available through her website at www.becomingmystrongerme.com.Resources Mentioned:The Stronger Mind by Nassim Ebrahimi -- www.becomingmystrongerme.comBaller Goals by Nassim Ebrahimi (soccer-specific training book)Nassim's coaching program for coaches: quarterly cohort launching mid-June 2026 (email nasim@becomingmystrongerme.com for next cohort info)ILC community: ilovecoachingco.comInstagram: @ilovecoachingco / @adamrroach / @thejesswebberYouTube: youtube.com/@ilovecoachingcoNassim on Instagram: @strongerme | LinkedIn: Nassim Ebrahimi | TikTok: @becomingmystrongermeTimestamps: [00:00] Intro and welcome -- Adam introduces Nassim[00:39] You were born, and then what happened? -- Nassim's origin story[04:48] From psychology to the lecture hall to VP -- the linear path[09:19] The moment of pause: do I love it enough?[13:07] The first day after resignation (and why she cried for hours)[16:40] Getting off the couch: how Nassim built back[17:38] "I trusted me" -- the decision before the decision[19:44] Who are you without your title?[21:09] Volunteering everywhere and finding the coaching path by accident[27:38] Adam reflects: transferable skills and borrowed confidence[30:48] The confidence equation: Trusting Your Skills + Owning Your Role[34:58] Nassim's business: one-on-one, teams, keynotes, and the coach program[39:27] The Stronger Mind book origin story[41:46] Baller Goals and what's next[42:19] Adam's giveaway: first 10 DMs get a free book[43:23] Nassim's book club offer: 10 friends + a free hour with Nassim[44:51] What mental toughness actually looks like on the other side of coaching[47:27] The cliffhanger: Part 2 is coming[49:46] Closing reflections and mutual appreciationJoin the Community:If today's conversation stirred something for you, whether about your own identity, your confidence, or the coaches and clients you serve, the ILC community is where that conversation continues. Come build with us at ilovecoachingco.com.

You finally nailed your messaging. Your offer makes sense. People are signing up. And then you launch your group program, or step on a stage, or start a podcast, and suddenly none of it works anymore. What happened?This is the final episode in our seven part Maslow's Mountain series, and it might be the most important one. Adam and Jess close out the series by naming the exact thing that trips up coaches right after they've had success: they treat what they learned like a checklist. Check the box, move on, forget it ever happened. Then they step into a new space, a new offer, a new stage, and they climb right back to the top of the mountain they just spent six episodes learning to climb down from.Adam calls it language creep. Jess calls it the now what problem. Either way, it's the same pattern. You build a one to one practice using Maslow's hierarchy to meet your avatar where they are. It works. Then you launch a group program, or get invited to speak, or start a podcast, and you go right back to summit language. "I built this incredible framework." "Here's everything I've accomplished." And the audience you're now in front of doesn't speak that language, because they're standing somewhere completely different on the mountain than you are.What You'll Learn:Why "checklist thinking" is the most common reason coaches lose momentum right after a winThe difference between the mountain you climbed and the mountain you're climbing next, and why your messaging has to reset for each oneWhy authority on a stage doesn't come from sounding smart, and why over explaining actually loses your audienceHow to use Maslow's hierarchy as an audit tool for slide decks, ad copy, funnels, and anything else you put in front of your avatarThe real difference between being an educator and being an influencer, and why neither should be your identityA practical way to use AI to prepare for podcast guest appearances, keynotes, or any new platform by feeding it your messaging and asking for an audit, not a generic summaryWhy this entire seven part series comes down to one sentence: it's not about youThe Big Idea:Every time you move to a new "mountain," whether that's launching a group program, stepping on a stage, or starting a podcast, your avatar resets to their own base camp. Your framework, your payoff, even your credibility can stay the same. But your language has to meet them where they are, not where you are. The coaches who keep winning are the ones who keep auditing their messaging against Maslow's hierarchy every single time they show up somewhere new.Notable Quote:"You don't have to look good and be right to gain authority. Your feet being on the stage already give you authority." - Jess WebberResources Mentioned:Story Brand and Hero on a Mission by Donald Miller, referenced as ongoing filters for hero vs. guide positioningGet Paid to Coach free guide at ilovecoachingco.com/get-paid-to-coach$10K+ Coaching Offer Challenge at ilovecoachingco.com/challengeREAL Coach Method Membership at ilovecoachingco.com/discoverInstagram: @ilovecoachingco / @adamrroach / @coachjesswebberYouTube: youtube.com/@ilovecoachingcoJoin the Community:If you're building a coaching business, already running one, or just starting to think about it, ILC has resources for wherever you are. Free guides, live and virtual events, and a community built specifically for coaches who want something that's actually theirs. Find it all at ilovecoachingco.com.

We talk to Tony and Pat from the Independent Labor Club about resisting the Delaney Hall detention facility in Newark. But first, some basketball, California elections and 60 Minutes updates. Check out the ILC: https://ilclabor.com/ Cosecha: lahuelga.com Paid Protest: https://www.instagram.com/paidprotestcomedy/ Subscribe to our bonus feed at Patreon.com/poddamnamerica

You built something that works. You know it works because clients have told you so. But when it comes time to share that proof, something freezes up. It feels like bragging. It feels like selling. So you say nothing, or you bury the win in data and credentials nobody asked for, and the person on the other side of the table leaves without knowing you could actually help them.That's exactly what Adam and Jess dig into in this episode, the sixth in their seven-part Maslow Mountain series. And the answer is simpler than most coaches expect: one story, told from the right place on the mountain, does more than a hundred polished sales calls ever could.The whole premise of "Proof That Works" is that testimonials and case studies aren't marketing tools. They're relationship tools. When you frame a client win as a story, told from the client's perspective and anchored at the level of the problem they were actually experiencing, the right avatar can see themselves in it. They stop evaluating you and start imagining what's possible for them. That's the shift from a sales call to a discovery call where they end up asking you how to work together.Jess shares a real example from a recent introductory call: one client story, one clearly articulated outcome, and every objection the prospect had was handled before it was ever spoken. No pitch, no close, just proof told as narrative. Adam builds on that with the flywheel framework: one offer, one conversion, one payoff, one testimonial, one story that keeps repeating as you continue to attract the same avatar.The conversation also addresses the coaches who hesitate to share wins because they don't want to come across as self-promotional. Adam and Jess are clear on this distinction: promotion is about you, proof is about your client. When the story centers the avatar as the one who did the work and achieved the outcome, you are not the hero of that story. You're the guide. And that framing changes how people receive it entirely.What you'll take away from this episode:Why one well-told client story outperforms a library of testimonials no one readsHow to tell a story that lands at the right level on Maslow's Mountain, so it actually connects with the person you want to attractThe storytelling framework: context, emotion, obstacle, resolution, and how to sequence them so your avatar sees themselves before you ever mention your offerWhy proof and promotion are two completely different things, and how to tell which one you're doingHow pre-handling objections through story means you never have to answer them directly on a callThe specialist vs. generalist distinction and why generalist coaches struggle to build any proof that actually convertsHow to turn a single client result into a flywheel that keeps attracting the right people consistentlyThe big idea: Coaches who struggle to attract clients usually have enough proof. What they don't have is a story. The proof exists in their work. The story is what makes it land with the next person who needs it. When you stop trying to convince and start telling the truth about what happened for someone else, you move from selling to serving. And the close takes care of itself.Notable quote:"I don't ever feel like I'm promoting. I just feel so confident in the outcome that I've gotten people that it makes it easy to connect." -- Jess WebberResources Mentioned:StoryBrand framework (Donald Miller) -- referenced as context for guide vs. hero languageILC community and events: ilovecoachingco.comInstagram: @ilovecoachingco / @adamrroach / @thejesswebberYouTube: youtube.com/@ilovecoachingcoReady to stop guessing and start growing? The ILC community is where coaches build real, aligned businesses grounded in their actual expertise. Join us at ilovecoachingco.com.

You've got the message. You know who you're talking to. So why isn't the marketing working?That's the exact question Adam Roach and Jess Webber dig into in Part 4 of the Maslow Mountain series. This is the episode where the internal work you've done on messaging finally has to go public, and it turns out that's where most coaches hit a wall they didn't see coming.The conversation starts with a distinction that sounds simple but cuts deep: marketing versus performing. If you've been tweaking your message to fit the room, adjusting your language based on who's watching, or changing what you lead with depending on the platform, that's performance. Marketing is something different. It's a clear, consistent message people start to associate with you before you ever show up. It's reputation built in advance. And the gap between those two things is costing coaches real opportunity every single day.Adam and Jess also get into the owned versus borrowed media question, and they're not gentle about it. Borrowed media, your social platforms, your Instagram followers, your TikTok audience, works until it doesn't. You don't own any of it, and one algorithm change or account suspension can erase years of effort overnight. The more durable play is building something you own, getting consistent there first, and then using borrowed platforms to invite people into it, not the other way around.What you'll learn in this episode:Why most coaches are performing instead of marketing, and exactly what the difference looks like in practiceThe "see vs. seek" framework: why you want people actively looking for your solution, not just noticing you existWhy you get tired of your marketing before your market does, and what to do about itThe owned vs. borrowed media strategy ILC uses to control their marketing machineHow Adam and Jess grew ILC's email open rates from under 20% to nearly 67% by fixing message-to-avatar alignmentWhat a lead magnet actually needs to do (and why a simple Google Doc outperformed a professionally designed one)How to build marketing that keeps running even when you're not in the roomThe big idea here is the machine. When your messaging is accurate, when it lands with the right avatar at the right place on the mountain, marketing stops being something you have to push. It starts being something that pulls people toward you while you're doing everything else. That's not a dream state. Adam and Jess are living it right now, and they show the receipts."You want people to seek you versus just see you. And that's a big difference." — Adam RoachResources Mentioned:ILC Community + New Lead Magnet: ilovecoachingco.comUpcoming Sellable Offers Challenge: ilovecoachingco.com/challengeInstagram: @ilovecoachingco / @adamrroach / @thejesswebberYouTube: youtube.com/@ilovecoachingcoTimestamps:[00:00] Intro + Series Recap (Parts 1–3)[03:11] Marketing vs. Performing: What's the Difference?[05:39] See vs. Seek: The Framework[07:06] Why Coaches Quit Marketing Too Soon[09:02] Owned vs. Borrowed Media[13:18] The Dangers of Building Only on Social (Real Story)[15:34] ILC's Email Data: Open Rates from Sub-20% to 67%[18:54] How to Build a Lead Magnet from What You Already Do[23:39] The Machine: Marketing That Runs Without You[27:03] ILC's New Lead Magnet + Sellable Offers Challenge Teaser[28:04] Sneak Peek: Episode 5 — The Avatar ProblemReady to stop guessing and start growing? The ILC community is where coaches build businesses they're actually proud of. Head to ilovecoachingco.com to check out the new lead magnet and the upcoming Sellable Offers Challenge.

Summer can either become a missed opportunity, or a powerful season of growth.In this episode, I share a clip from a class for students who have already completed the Ivy League Challenge. After students finish the ILC, they continue meeting weekly to stay connected, keep building, and grow inside a positive community.In this class, Wes shares his simple summer planning system: choose the areas of your life you want to develop, set a few meaningful goals, and create small routines that keep you moving without over-scheduling every hour.You'll hear how students are thinking about research, writing, podcasts, fitness, impact projects, friendships, and even fried chicken.The goal isn't to have the busiest summer.The goal is to design a summer that helps you grow-----To register for the Ivy League Challenge, visit our websiteTo follow on Instagram:  @TheIvyLeagueChallengeTo join us on our Facebook group for parents

You've worked on your messaging. You've used AI to help clean it up. You've rewritten your bio three times. And still, the right people aren't responding.Here's the problem Adam and Jess zero in on in this episode: most coaches are writing from where they are, not from where their people are. That gap is costing you conversations, clients, and trust.This is Part 3 of the Maslow Mountain series, and it's probably the one you've been waiting for. Parts 1 and 2 built the foundation of understanding your avatar and nailing your payoff. This episode is where it all lands, because if your messaging doesn't meet your person on the level of the mountain they're actually standing on, none of the rest of it matters.The conversation gets specific fast. Jess flags the "I help blank do blank" formula as the single most common messaging mistake coaches make, not because the structure is wrong but because the language is always too generic, too aspirational, and too far from where the person actually is right now. Adam pulls in the psychographic lens: what does your avatar think, feel, and need at this exact moment? Those are the three questions that need to drive every piece of messaging you put into the world.They also get honest about AI. It's a great thought partner. It's a lousy content creator unless you've done the foundational human work first. And in a world where people can now feel the difference between a real person's message and a generated one, leaning on AI without that foundation isn't just ineffective. It actively erodes trust.What you'll take away from this episode:Why "I help [avatar] achieve [outcome]" is killing your conversions and what to replace it withThe specific question you need to answer before writing a single word of messaging: where is your avatar on the mountain right now?Why aspirational language repels the very people you're trying to attractHow to remove ego from your messaging without removing yourself from itThe difference between specificity and complexity (and why your audience wants one, not both)What Taki Moore gets right that most coaches get completely wrong about authentic messagingWhy storytelling outperforms information dumping every single time, on social, on stage, and everywhere elseThe big idea:Your messaging has nothing to do with you. It has everything to do with them. The coaches who land clients consistently aren't the most credentialed or the most polished. They're the ones whose words make their ideal client think, "How did they know that's exactly where I am right now?" That feeling is trust. And trust is what closes.Notable quote:"Stop the peacocking and just really start being you. Even if you're a manatee." — Jess WebberResources Mentioned:Building a StoryBrand by Donald Miller (referenced: guide vs. hero positioning)Taki Moore — go watch his recent reels for a masterclass in authentic, avatar-first messagingILC Community: ilovecoachingco.comInstagram: @ilovecoachingco / @adamrroach / @thejesswebberYouTube: youtube.com/@ilovecoachingcoTimestamps:[00:00] Opening: Episode 3 of Maslow Mountain and the messaging problem[00:29] Why AI is a copilot, not a content creator[02:37] What happens when you rely solely on AI for messaging[04:10] The "I help blank do blank" trap[05:30] Think and feel: the two messaging filters that build trust[06:36] Why specificity is the trust builder (and it doesn't mean fancy language)[08:26] Push pause: your one action item from this episode[09:01] Active cringe face and why aspirational language misses the mark[11:00] Social media is not about you, full stop[12:53] The hero vs. guide shift (Donald Miller reference)[14:00] Jess's keynote story: what happened when she removed the info dump[15:50] Taki Moore as a case study in authentic positional messaging[18:28] Authenticity vs. ego: the distinction that changes everything[20:57] The peacocking problem and the permission to stop[22:43] Preview: Part 4 is coming, and it's about letting your message work without youJoin the Community:Ready to build a coaching business where the right people actually find you? The ILC community is where coaches stop guessing at their messaging and start building something that works. Head over to ilovecoachingco.com.

In this solo episode, Cody breaks down the top hospitality conferences and networking events every hotel owner, operator, and hospitality professional should have on their radar this year.Whether you're looking to grow your network, discover new technology, stay ahead of industry trends, or simply surround yourself with other passionate hospitality leaders—these events can completely change the trajectory of your business.Cody shares where he'll be, what makes each event unique, and how to maximize the value of attending.

In this episode, host David Millili brings listeners inside Indie Cultivate Boston, hosted in partnership with ILC. David sits down with leading vendors and innovators including Airbnb, Watermelon Ghost, Direct Booker, Stash Rewards, Cloudbeds, Directful, and Canary Technologies. Across these conversations, a clear theme emerges: the independent hotel space is at a turning point driven by AI, evolving guest expectations, and the ongoing battle for direct bookings versus OTAs.Guests discuss how AI is reshaping discoverability, guest engagement, and operations, while also raising critical questions about visibility in AI-driven search. From loyalty programs and retention platforms to booking infrastructure and guest experience tools, each guest shares how they're helping independent hotels compete, differentiate, and thrive.You'll hear perspectives on: How AI is changing hotel discovery and booking behavior  The future of direct bookings and OTA dependency  Experiential stays and evolving guest expectations  Why independent hotels have a unique opportunity in the AI era Watch the FULL EPISODE on YouTube: https://youtu.be/wZUi1eIuS5ALinkedIn Links:Audrey Yates - VP of Hotel Partnerships, Stash RewardsAdam Harris - CEO, CloudbedsTim Kinsella - Global Sales - Strategy, Canary TechnologiesRon Sandel - Director of Hotels, AirbnbGeorgie Downie - Co-Founder & CEO, Watermelon GhostLindsay Wenger - VP of Sales, DirectfulSanjay Vakil - Co-Founder & CEO, Direct BookerMeg Gutowski - ILCFor full show notes head to: https://themodernhotelier.com/episode/272Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-..Join the conversation on today's episode on The Modern Hotelier LinkedIn pageConnect with Steve and David:Steve: https://www.linkedin.com/in/%F0%9F%8E...David: https://www.linkedin.com/in/david-mil.

In this special episode, host David Millili takes listeners inside Indie Cultivate Boston in partnership with ILC, capturing candid conversations with some of the most forward-thinking leaders in hospitality.Across the discussions, a common theme emerges while AI and automation are transforming back-of-house operations, the future of hospitality remains deeply human—rooted in creativity, storytelling, and meaningful guest connection. Leaders also reflect on the importance of independence in hotel development, the value of intimate industry gatherings like ILC, and how new models are reshaping ownership, management, and guest experience.In this episode, you'll learn: How leading hotel operators are thinking about AI—not as a replacement for people, but as a tool to automate and augment hospitality operations while keeping guest experience human-first  Why independent hotels continue to thrive through creativity, storytelling, and strong emotional connection with guests  How technology platforms like integrated PMS systems and “hospitality operating systems” are helping smaller hotel brands scale more efficiently  What “Powered by Kasa” and similar models mean for hoteliers looking to build brands faster without losing creative control  The emerging balance between technology-driven efficiency and analog, human-centered hospitality experiencesWatch the FULL EPISODE on YouTube: https://youtu.be/A6U4jtjfbpg LinkedIn Links:Roman Pedan: https://www.linkedin.com/in/roman-pedan-594897325/Steven Rubin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/stevenmrubin/Jen Parks: https://www.linkedin.com/in/jenniferfigariparks/Jason August: https://www.linkedin.com/in/jaugust/Brian Meyer: https://www.linkedin.com/in/brian-meyer-b004832b6/John Flannigan: https://www.linkedin.com/in/john-flannigan-73550a1/Jen Barnwell: https://www.linkedin.com/in/jennifer-barnwell-a8689ba/Matt Schwartz: https://www.linkedin.com/in/matthewaschwartz/Andrew Benioff: https://www.linkedin.com/in/llenrockgroupbenioff/For full show notes head to: https://themodernhotelier.com/episode/270Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-..Join the conversation on today's episode on The Modern Hotelier LinkedIn pageConnect with Steve and David:Steve: https://www.linkedin.com/in/%F0%9F%8E...David: https://www.linkedin.com/in/david-mil.

audio from the Independent Labor Club of New York City's 03/21 panel at the NYU Games Center featuring JD Calvelli, Nathan Greyson, and Goran, Svorcan-Mercola. Moderated by Alexander King. To find more info about the ILC check out ILCLabor.com to sign up.Become a supporter of our podcast at www.patreon.com/thiswreckageSong: LDR - Video Games (Live at Stagecoach)

Episode SummaryMost coaches want to build a group offer. Very few sit down and do the math first. That's exactly why this episode exists.This is Step 2 in our 7-part series on scaling your coaching business from one-to-one into a one-to-many model. If you haven't listened to Step 1 on defining your payoff, start there first. The math in this episode won't land without it.Adam and Jess break down the actual numbers behind transitioning from one-to-one into group coaching, and why skipping this step is the reason so many coaches burn out instead of scaling up.What You'll LearnWhy $15K/month in one-to-one revenue is the benchmark before group makes strategic senseThe replacement math rule: your group must equal or exceed the one-to-one slot it replacesWhy pricing your group at $97 to "make it accessible" creates a harder lift, not an easier oneHow to use group to buy back your time without sacrificing incomeWhat the ascension model actually looks like when you build it in the right order (hint: it's backwards from what most people teach)The difference between independent coaching and being a delivery vehicle for someone else's payoffWhy imposter syndrome around pricing almost always points back to a payoff problem, not a confidence problemPareto's Principle applied: why you may only need 25 real conversations to fill a group of fiveTimestamps00:00 Why we're talking about math (and why it's not as scary as it sounds)01:12 Where you should be before building a group: the one-to-one foundation03:06 The $15K/month benchmark and what it actually requires in time05:49 The replacement math rule explained07:05 Why low-ticket group pricing creates a bigger problem than it solves08:02 Playing with the math: replacing all your one-to-ones vs. some of them09:40 What "ascension" actually means and why ILC builds it backwards13:21 Why group creates pricing power in your one-to-one14:41 Dollar-per-hour productivity and how group changes the equation16:36 The dependent coaching model and why it's costing you more than money18:29 How to know if your pricing fear is actually a payoff problem27:40 Pareto's Principle: the 25 conversations framework for filling your group30:19 Why time is the only non-renewable asset in this businessQuotes From This Episode"The numbers inform the decision. Most people will get so excited by the opportunity and they'll have big vision and they'll want to build something, and yet they won't know the numbers behind it." - Jess"Your group coaching has to be equal to or greater than one one-on-one coaching client. Equal or greater than." - Adam"If you're in a dependent model, you are not actually coaching. You are the vehicle to deliver the payoff defined by the company you're coaching for." - Jess"I truly believe that if you're gagging on the idea of charging somebody $5,000, you don't know your payoff. That's why you have imposter syndrome around these numbers." - Jess"Time is the only non-renewable asset. You can spend money, you can lose money, you can make it back. But if you spend time, you can't get it back." - Jess"You don't have to know everybody. You don't have to get everybody in your group. You only need a percentage, a fraction of the people you think you need to fill that group." - JessResources + Next StepsDownload the free Get Paid to Coach guide at ilovecoachingco.com (start here if you haven't already)Join the $10K+ Coaching Offer ChallengeBecome a member of the REAL Coach Method communityMissed Step 1? Go back and listen to the payoff episode before this one

You don't need a better funnel to launch your group coaching program. You need one sentence. And if you can't say it clearly to a stranger at a dinner table, your offer isn't ready — no matter how good your coaching actually is. This is Part 1 of a 7-part series on scaling from one-on-one to one-to-many, and Adam and Jess are starting with the thing almost every coach skips.What You'll LearnWhat "payoff language" means and why vague, aspirational promises like "build a legacy" are costing you clientsThe one-sentence formula for a coaching offer that attracts buyers and filters out everyone elseWhy leading with your credentials is the fastest way to lose someone who actually needs you right nowThe difference between an attainable payoff and an aspirational one — and why only one of them convertsHow getting crystal clear on your offer transformation is the fastest cure for imposter syndromeEpisode SummaryThis is Part 1 of ILC's 7-step framework for transitioning your coaching business from one-on-one to a group or one-to-many model. And Adam and Jess are starting at the foundation most coaches never build: your payoff.Your payoff is the specific, one-sentence answer to: who do you help, what is their problem, and what is your solution? Think headache relief — not "become the best version of yourself." If someone is in pain and shopping for a solution, they need to hear plain, explicit language that tells them you have what they need. Flowery, idealized language doesn't land when someone's head hurts.Adam and Jess walk through a simple three-part payoff formula: start with your avatar (almost always a past version of yourself), name the exact problem they have, and articulate the solution you have already delivered — not one you aspire to deliver someday. That last distinction matters. A payoff rooted in your own lived experience is what gives you the competence and confidence to show up without constantly second-guessing yourself.They also bring in Donald Miller's StoryBrand framework here — the shift from being the hero of your own story to becoming the guide. When your payoff is grounded in empathy and proven experience, imposter syndrome loses its grip. You stop trying to prove yourself and start pointing people toward the outcome you already know how to deliver.Everything in a one-to-many offer is built from the payoff. This is where it starts.Key Quote"Everything is built from the payoff. It's not everything is built from the person." — JessResources + LinksBuilding a StoryBrand by Donald Miller (hero vs. guide framework, cognitive dissonance) amzn.to/3N9coPTREAL Coach Method Blueprint — ILC's Phase 2 Checklist: "My payoff is specific, realistic, and easy to explain in one sentence."Get Paid to Coach PDF ilovecoachingco.com/get-paid-to-coachILC Call to ActionIf your payoff isn't clear yet, start here. Grab the free Get Paid to Coach PDF at ilovecoachingco.com/get-paid-to-coach — it walks you through this exact process whether you're still in one-on-one or ready to build something bigger. Clear payoff, clear business. That's where everything starts.

À qui appartient réellement la terre dans le monde ? Un nouveau rapport publié par la FAO, en collaboration avec le CIRAD et la Coalition internationale pour l'accès à la terre (ILC), dresse un état des lieux préoccupant des droits fonciers à l'échelle mondiale.Selon l'étude, seulement 35 % des terres dans le monde sont aujourd'hui formellement documentées. Une situation qui alimente une insécurité foncière massive : près de 1,1 milliard de personnes, soit environ 23 % de la population adulte mondiale, craignent de perdre leurs terres dans les cinq prochaines années.Pourtant, des progrès ont été accomplis sur le plan politique. « Le rapport montre qu'au cours des deux dernières décennies, des progrès ont été réalisés, particulièrement en matière de politiques publiques », explique Ward Anseeuw, responsable de l'équipe foncière de la FAO.Mais sur le terrain, l'insécurité foncière persiste. Lorsque les droits sont flous ou contestés, les risques d'expulsions, d'accaparement des terres et de conflits augmentent, souligne le rapport, qui appelle à accélérer la sécurisation des droits fonciers dans le monde.(Interview : Ward Anseeuw, responsable de l'équipe foncière de la FAO; propos recueillis par Cristina Silveiro)

JCO PO author Dr. Foldi at UPMC Hillman Cancer Center and University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine shares insights into the JCO PO article, "Personalized Circulating Tumor DNA Testing for Detection of Progression and Treatment Response Monitoring in Patients With Metastatic Invasive Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast." Host Dr. Rafeh Naqash and Dr. Foldi discuss how serial ctDNA testing in patients with mILC is feasible and may enable personalized surveillance and real-time therapeutic monitoring. TRANSCRIPT Dr. Rafeh Naqash: Hello, and welcome to JCO Precision Oncology Conversations, where we bring you engaging conversations with authors of clinically relevant and highly significant JCO PO articles. I am your host, Dr. Rafeh Naqash, podcast editor for JCO Precision Oncology and Associate Professor at the OU Health Stephenson Cancer Center at the University of Oklahoma. Today, we are thrilled to be joined by Dr. Julia Foldi, Assistant Professor of Medicine in the Division of Hematology-Oncology at University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and the Magee-Womens Hospital of the UPMC. She is also the lead and corresponding author of the JCO Precision Oncology article entitled "Personalized Circulating Tumor DNA Testing for Detection of Progression and Treatment Response Monitoring in Patients with Metastatic Invasive Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast." At the time of this recording, our guest's disclosures will be linked in the transcript. Julia, welcome to our podcast, and thank you for joining us today. Dr. Julia Foldi: Thank you so much for having me. It is a pleasure. Dr. Rafeh Naqash: Again, your manuscript and project address a few interesting things, so we will start with the basics, since we have a broad audience that comprises trainees, community oncologists, and obviously precision medicine experts as well. So, let us start with invasive lobular breast carcinoma. I have been out of fellowship for several years now, and I do not know much about invasive lobular carcinoma. Could you tell us what it is, what some of the genomic characteristics are, why it is different, and why it is important to have a different way to understand disease biology and track disease status with this type of breast cancer? Dr. Julia Foldi: Yes, thank you for that question. It is really important to frame this study. So, lobular breast cancers, which we shorten to ILC, are the second most common histologic subtype of breast cancer after ductal breast cancers. ILC makes up about 10 to 15 percent of all breast cancers, so it is relatively rare, but in the big scheme of things, because breast cancer is so common, this represents actually over 40,000 new diagnoses a year in the US of lobular breast cancers. What is unique about ILC is it is characterized by loss of an adhesion molecule, E-cadherin. It is encoded by the CDH1 gene. What it does is these tumors tend to form discohesive, single-file patterns and infiltrate into the tumor stroma, as opposed to ductal cancers, which generally form more cohesive masses. As we generally explain to patients, ductal cancers tend to form lumps, while lobular cancers often are not palpable because they infiltrate into the stroma. This creates several challenges, particularly when it comes to imaging. In the diagnostic setting, we know that mammograms and ultrasounds have less sensitivity to detect lobular versus ductal breast cancer. When it comes to the metastatic setting, conventional imaging techniques like CT scans have less sensitivity to detect lobular lesions often. One other unique characteristic of ILC is that these tumors tend to have lower proliferation rates. Because our glucose-based PET scans depend on glucose uptake of proliferating cells, often these tumors also are not avid on conventional FDG-PET scans. It is a challenge for us to monitor these patients as they go through treatment. If you think about the metastatic setting, we start a new treatment, we image people every three to four cycles, about every three months, and we combine the imaging results with clinical assessment and tumor markers to decide if the treatment is working. But if your imaging is not reliable, sometimes even at diagnosis, to really detect these tumors, then really, how are we following these patients? This is really the unique challenge in the metastatic setting in patients with lobular breast cancer: we cannot rely on the imaging to tell if patients are responding to treatment. This is where liquid biopsies are really, really important, and as the field is growing up and we have better and better technologies, lobular breast cancer is going to be a field where they are going to play an important role. Dr. Rafeh Naqash: Thank you for that easy-to-understand background. The second aspect that I would like to have some context on, to help the audience understand why you did what you did, is ctDNA, tumor informed and non-informed. Could you tell us what these subtypes of liquid biopsies are and why you chose a tumor informed assay for your study? Dr. Julia Foldi: Yes, it is really important to understand these differences. As you mentioned, there are two main platforms for liquid biopsy assays, circulating tumor DNA assays. I think what is more commonly used in the metastatic setting are non-tumor informed assays, or agnostic assays. These are generally next-generation sequencing-based assays that a lot of companies offer, like Guardant, Tempus, Caris, and FoundationOne. These do not require tumor tissue; they just require a blood sample, a plasma sample, essentially. The next-generation sequencing is done on cell-free DNA that is extracted from the plasma, and it is looking for any cell-free DNA and essentially, figuring out what part of the cell-free DNA comes from the tumor is done through a bioinformatics approach. Most of these assays are panel tests for cancer-associated mutations that we know either have therapeutic significance or biologic significance. So, the results we receive from these tests generally read out specific mutations in oncogenic genes, or sometimes things like fusions where we have specific targeted drugs. Some of the newer assays can also read out tumor fraction; for example, the newest generation Guardant assay that is methylation-based, they can also quantify tumor fraction. But the disadvantage of the tumor agnostic approach is that it is a little bit less sensitive. Opposed to that, we have our tumor informed tests, and these require tumor tissue. Essentially, the tumor is sequenced; this can either be whole exome or whole genome sequencing. The newer generation assays are now using whole genome sequencing of the tumor tissue, and a personalized, patient-specific panel of alterations is essentially barcoded on that tumor tissue. This can be either structural variants or it can be mutations, but generally, these are not driver mutations, but sort of things that are present in the tumor tissue that tend to stay unchanged over time. For each particular patient, a personalized assay, if you want to call it a fingerprint or barcode, is created, and then that is what then is used to test the plasma sample. Essentially, you are looking for that specific cancer in the blood, that barcode or fingerprint in the blood. Because of this, this is a much more sensitive way of looking for ctDNA, and obviously, this detects only that particular tumor that was sequenced originally. So, it is much more sensitive and specific to that tumor that was sequenced. You can argue for both approaches in different settings. We use them in different settings because they give us different information. The tumor agnostic approach gives us mutations, which can be used to determine what the next best therapy to use is, while the tumor informed assay is more sensitive, but it is not going to give us information on therapeutic targets. However, it is quantified, and we can follow it over time to see how it changes. We think that it is going to tell us how patients respond to treatment because we see our circulating tumor DNA levels rise and fall as the cancer burden increases or decreases. We decided to use the tumor informed approach in this particular study because we were really interested in how to determine if patients are having response to treatment versus if they are going to progress on their treatment, more so than looking for specific mutations. Dr. Rafeh Naqash: When you think about these tumor informed assays and you think about barcoding the mutations on the original tumor that you try to track or follow in subsequent blood samples, plasma samples, in your experience, if you have done it in non-lobular cancers, do you think shedding from the tumor has something to do with what you capture or how much you capture? Dr. Julia Foldi: Absolutely. I think there are multiple factors that go into whether someone has detectable ctDNA or not, and that has to do with the type of cancer, the location, right, where is the metastatic site? This is something that we do not fully understand yet: what are tumors that shed more versus not? There is also clearance of ctDNA, and so how fast that clearance occurs is also something that will affect what you can detect in the blood. ctDNA is very short-lived, only has a half-life of hours, and so you can imagine that if there is little shedding and a lot of excretion, then you are not going to be detecting a lot of it. In general, in the metastatic setting, we see that we can detect ctDNA in a lot of cases, especially when patients are progressing on treatment, because we imagine their tumor burden is higher at that point. Even with the non-tumor informed assays, we detect a lot of ctDNA. Part of this study was to actually assess: what is the proportion of patients where we can have this information? Because if we are only going to be able to detect ctDNA in less than 50 percent of patients, then it is not going to be a useful method to follow them with. Because this field is new and we have not been using a lot of tumor informed assays in the metastatic setting, we did not really know what to expect when we set out to look at this. We did not know what was going to be the baseline detection rate in this patient population, so that was one of the first things that we wanted to answer. Dr. Rafeh Naqash: Excellent. Now going to this manuscript in particular, what was the research question, what was the patient population, and what was the strategy that you used to investigate some of these questions? Dr. Julia Foldi: So, we partnered with Natera, and the reason was that their Signatera tumor-informed assay was the first personalized, tumor-informed, really an MRD assay, minimal residual disease detection assay. It has been around the longest and has been pretty widely used commercially already, even though some of our data is still lacking. but we know that people are using this in the real world. We wanted to gather some real-world data specifically in lobular patients. So, we asked Natera to look at their database of commercial Signatera testing and look for patients with stage 4 lobular breast cancer. The information all comes from the submitting physicians sending in pathologic reports and clinical notes, and so they have that information from the requisitions essentially that are sent in by the ordering physician. We found 66 patients who were on first-line or close to first-line endocrine-based therapies for their metastatic lobular breast cancer and had serial collections of Signatera tests. The way we defined baseline was that the first Signatera had to be sent within three months of starting treatment. So, it is not truly baseline, but again, this is a limitation of looking at real-world data is that you are not always going to get the best time point that you need. We had over 350 samples from those 66 patients, again longitudinal ctDNA samples, and our first question was what is the baseline detection rate using this tumor informed assay? Then, most importantly, what is the concordance between changes in ctDNA and clinical response to treatment? That is defined by essentially radiologic response to treatment. Dr. Rafeh Naqash: Interesting. So, what were some of your observations in terms of ctDNA dynamics, whether baseline levels made a difference, whether subsequent levels at different time points made a difference, or subsequent levels at, let us say, cycle three made a difference? Were there any specific trends that you saw? Dr. Julia Foldi: So, first, at baseline, 95 percent of patients had detectable ctDNA, which is, I think, a really important data point because it tells us that this can be a really useful test. If we can detect it in almost all patients before they start treatment, we are going to be able to follow this longitudinally. And again, these were not true baseline samples. So, I think if we look really at baseline before starting treatment, almost all patients will have detectable ctDNA in the metastatic setting. The second important thing we saw was that disease progression correlated very well with increase in ctDNA. So, in most patients who had disease progression by imaging, we saw increase in ctDNA. Conversely, in most patients who had clinical benefit from their treatment, so they had a response or stable disease, we saw decrease in ctDNA levels. It seems that what we call molecular response based on ctDNA is tracking very nicely along with the radiographic response. So, those were really the two main observations. Again, this is a small cohort, limited by its real-world nature and the time points that ctDNA assay was sent was obviously not mandated. This is a real-world data set, and so we could not really look at specific time points like you asked about, let us say, cycle three of therapy, right? We did not have all of the right time points for all of the patients. But what we were able to do was to graph out some specific patient scenarios to illustrate how changes in ctDNA correlate with imaging response. I can talk a little bit about that. Dr. Rafeh Naqash: That was going to be my question. Did you see patients who had serial monitoring using the tumor informed ctDNA assay where the assay became positive a few months before the imaging? Did you have any of those kinds of observations? Dr. Julia Foldi: Yes, so I think this is where the field is going: are we able to use this technology to maybe detect progression before it becomes clinically apparent? Of course, there are lots of questions about: does that really matter? But it seems like, based on some of the patient scenarios that we present in the paper, that this testing can do that. So, we had a specific scenario, and this is illustrated in a figure in the paper, really showing the treatment as well as the changes in ctDNA, tumor markers, and also radiographic response. So, this particular patient was on first-line endocrine therapy and CDK4/6 inhibitor with palbociclib. Initially, she had a low-level detectable ctDNA. It became undetectable during treatment, and the patient had a couple of serial ctDNA assays that were negative, so undetectable. And then we started, after about seven months on this combination therapy, the ctDNA levels started rising. She actually had three serial ctDNA assays with increasing level of ctDNA before she even had any imaging tests. And then around the time that the ctDNA peaked, this patient had radiographic evidence of progression. There was also an NGS-based assay sent to look for specific mutations at that point. The patient was found to have an ESR1 mutation, which is very common in this patient population. She was switched to a novel oral SERD, elacestrant, and the ctDNA fell again to undetectable within the first couple months of being on elacestrant. And then a very similar thing happened: while she was on this second-line therapy, she had three serial negative ctDNA assays, and then the fourth one was positive. This was two months before the patient had a scan that showed progression again. Dr. Rafeh Naqash: And Julia, like you mentioned, this is a small sample size, limited number of patients, in this case, one patient case scenario, but provides insights into other important aspects around escalation or de-escalation of therapy where perhaps ctDNA could be used as an integral biomarker rather than an exploratory biomarker. What are some of your thoughts around that and how is the breast cancer space? I know like in GI and bladder cancer, there has been a significant uptrend in MRD assessments for therapeutic decision making. What is happening in the breast cancer space? Dr. Julia Foldi: So, super interesting. I think this is where a lot of our different fields are going. In the breast cancer space, so far, I have seen a lot of escalation attempts. It is not even necessarily in this particular setting where we are looking at dynamics of ctDNA, but in the breast cancer world, of course, we have a lot of data on resistance mutations. I mentioned ESR1 mutation in a particular patient in our study. ESR1 mutations are very common in patients with ER-positive breast cancer who are on long-term endocrine therapy, and ESR1 mutations confer resistance to aromatase inhibitors. So, that is an area that there has been a lot of interest in trying to detect ESR1 mutations earlier and switching therapy early. So, this was the basis of the SERENA-6 trial, which was presented last year at ASCO and created a lot of excitement. This was a trial where patients had non-tumor-informed NGS-based Guardant assay sent every three to six months while they were on first-line endocrine therapy with a CDK4/6 inhibitor. If they had an ESR1 mutation detected, they were randomized to either continue the same endocrine therapy or switch to an oral SERD. The trial showed that the population of patients who switched to the oral SERD did better in terms of progression-free survival than those who stayed on their original endocrine therapy. There are a lot of questions about how to use this in routine practice. Of course, it is not trivial to be sending a ctDNA assay every three to six months. The rate of detection of these mutations was relatively low in that study; again, the incidence increases in later lines of therapy. So, there are a lot of questions about whether we should be doing this in all of our first-line patients. The other question is, even the patients who stayed on their original endocrine therapy were able to stay on that for another nine months. So, there is this question of: are we switching patients too early to a new line of therapy by having this escalation approach? So, there are a lot of questions about this. As far as I know, at least in our practice, we are not using this approach just yet to escalate therapy. Time will tell how this all pans out. But I think what is even more interesting is the de-escalation question, and I think that is where tumor informed assays like Signatera and the data that our study generated can be applied. Actually, our plan is to generate some prospective data in the lobular breast cancer population, and I have an ongoing study to do that, to really be able to tease out the early ctDNA dynamics as patients first start on endocrine therapy. So, this is patients who are newly diagnosed, they are just starting on their first-line endocrine therapy, and measure, with sensitive assays, measure ctDNA dynamics in the first few months of therapy. In those patients who have a really robust response, that is where I think we can really think about de-escalation. In the patients whose ctDNA goes to undetectable after just a few weeks of therapy with just an endocrine agent, they might not even need a CDK4/6 inhibitor in their first-line treatment. So, that is an area where we are very interested in our group, and I know that other groups are looking at this too, to try to de-escalate therapy in patients who clear their ctDNA early on. Dr. Rafeh Naqash: Thank you so much. Well, lots of questions, but at the same time, progress comes through questions asked, and your project is one of those which is asking an interesting question in a rarer cancer and perhaps will lead to subsequent improvement in how we monitor these individuals and how we escalate or de-escalate therapy. Hopefully, we will get to see more of what you are working on in subsequent submissions to JCO Precision Oncology and perhaps talk more about it in a couple of years and see how the space and field is moving. Thanks again for sharing your insights. I do want to take one to two quick minutes talking about you as an investigator, Julia. If you could speak to your career pathway, your journey, the pathway to mentorship, the pathway to being a mentor, and how things have shaped for you in your personal professional growth. Dr. Julia Foldi: Sure, yeah, that is great. Thank you. So, I had a little bit of an unconventional path to clinical medicine. I actually thought I was going to be a basic scientist when I first started out. I got a PhD in Immunology right out of college and was studying not even anything cancer-related. I was studying macrophage signaling in inflammatory diseases, but I was in New York City. This was right around the time that the first checkpoint inhibitors were approved. Actually, some of my friends from my PhD program worked in Jim Allison's lab, who was the basic scientist responsible for ipilimumab. So, I got to kind of first-hand experience the excitement around bringing something from the lab into the clinic that actually changed really the course of oncology. And so, I got very excited about oncology and clinical medicine. So, I decided to kind of switch gears from there and I went back to medical school after finishing my PhD and got my MD at NYU. I knew I wanted to do oncology, so I did a research track residency and fellowship combined at Yale. I started working early on with the breast cancer team there. At the time, Lajos Pusztai was the head of translational research there at Yale, and I started working with him early in my residency and then through my fellowship. I worked on several trials with him, including a neoadjuvant checkpoint inhibitor trial in triple-negative breast cancer patients. During my last year in fellowship, I received a Conquer Cancer Young Investigator Award to study estrogen receptor heterogeneity using spatial transcriptomics in this subset of breast cancers that have intermediate estrogen receptor expression. From there, I joined the faculty at the University of Pittsburgh in 2022. So, I have been there about almost four years at this point. My interests really shifted slowly from triple-negative breast cancers towards ER-positive breast cancers. When I arrived in Pittsburgh, I started working very closely with some basic and translational researchers here who are very interested in estrogen signaling and mechanisms of resistance to endocrine therapy, and there is a large group here interested in lobular breast cancers. During my training, I was not super aware even that lobular breast cancer was a unique subtype of breast cancers, and that is, I think, changing a little bit. There is a lot more awareness in the breast cancer clinical and research community about ILC being a unique subtype, but it is not even really part of our training in fellowship, which we are trying to change. But I have become a lot more aware of this because of the research team here and through that, I have become really interested also on the clinical side. And so, we do have a Lobular Breast Cancer Research Center of Excellence here at the University of Pittsburgh and UPMC, and I am the leader on the clinical side. We have a really great team of basic and translational researchers looking at different aspects of lobular breast cancers, and some of the work that I am doing is related to this particular manuscript we discussed and the next steps, as I mentioned, a prospective study of early ctDNA dynamics in lobular patients. I also did some more clinical research work in collaboration with the NSABP looking at long-term outcomes of patients with lobular versus ductal breast cancers in some of their older trials. And so, that is, in a nutshell, a little bit about how I got here and how I became interested in ILC. Dr. Rafeh Naqash: Well, thank you for sharing those personal insights and personal journey. I am sure it will inspire other trainees, fellows, and perhaps junior faculty in trying to find their niche. The path, as you mentioned, is not always straight; it often tends to be convoluted. And then finding an area that you are interested in, taking things forward, and being persistent is often what matters. Dr. Julia Foldi: Thank you so much for having me. It was great. Dr. Rafeh Naqash: It was great chatting with you. And thank you for listening to JCO Precision Oncology Conversations. Don't forget to give us a rating or review, and be sure to subscribe so you never miss an episode. You can find all ASCO shows at asco.org/podcasts. The purpose of this podcast is to educate and to inform. This is not a substitute for professional medical care and is not intended for use in the diagnosis or treatment of individual conditions. Guests on this podcast express their own opinions, experience, and conclusions. Guest statements on the podcast do not express the opinions of ASCO. The mention of any product, service, organization, activity, or therapy should not be construed as an ASCO endorsement.  

Sean and Varn tackle the important question regarding the release of the much-vaunted 'Epstein Files': which ones of 'our faves' might be implicated? How do we avoid the 'socialism of fools' after this and Gaza? What does the Epstein story tell us about the rot at the heart of our ruling class? What do the files tell us about the absolute state of barbarism we currently live in and must find some way to work ourselves out of?N.B. at one point in the main episode Sean, in reference to diversity within Judaism, mentions the Satmar Hasidic community in NYC but neglects to mention why he brought it up which is because they one of the main sects that rejects Zionism on religious principle. To listen to the paywalled section where Sean and Varn elaborate more on these questions become a patron at www.patreon.com/thiswreckage and to watch the video recording of the whole thing become a patron of Varn at www.patreon.com/varnvlogThose interested in information about the Independent Labor Club can go to ILClabor.com and sign up.If you are in the Philadelphia area the ILC is having a first meetup for the Greater Philly chapter at Wissahickon Brewing Company on American Street Saturday, February 21st from 7pm to 8:30pm. For more info you can email ILCofPhilly at gmail dot com. Hope to see you there!Song: Gary Numan - This Wreckage

Welcome back to Fintech Recap. I'm Alex Johnson, joined (as always) by my partner in recapping, Jason Mikula. Even if we aren't sailing to BaaS Island, the news keeps flooding in. We kick off with crypto market structure, which nearly cleared Congress before imploding. The Clarity Act would've locked in broad crypto rules, including limits on stablecoin yield. Banks had momentum to close a key Genius Act loophole (until Coinbase pulled support at the last second). The backlash was swift: other crypto firms were blindsided, lawmakers were furious, and Brian Armstrong ended up in Davos, facing off with Jamie Dimon (who, reportedly, told him to stop lying on TV).  Then it's onto banking charters. NewBank got conditional OCC approval. Ford, GM, and PayPal all made ILC moves. Affirm filed in Nevada, citing "flexibility and diversification," but this is about control. With rising scrutiny on partner banks and consent orders in the air, a charter gives Affirm cleaner economics and regulatory insulation. Like Square and LendingClub before it, the goal is clear: own the balance sheet, shift volume gradually, and keep options open. From there, Capital One's surprise acquisition of Brex for $5B. Most commentary focused on the exit. More interesting is what CapOne wants: startup spend volume and a wedge into high-growth business banking. Integration will take time, and as Ramp scales faster on a leaner model, pressure around ROI will be mounting. Plus, in our Can't Let It Go corner, we look at fintech's dumbest lawsuit: Prism v. TomoCredit. A fake cash flow underwriting product. A stolen trademark. Fabricated and backdated blog posts. An agreed settlement … that Tomo then refused to sign or memorialize. Meanwhile, the site still takes credit card details from consumers who can't unsubscribe. And somehow, it's still going! This episode is brought to you by Plaid.  Plaid helps lenders approve more creditworthy borrowers without taking on more risk, combining real-time cash flow data with behavioral insights. It's a fast, familiar experience people trust, and that actually converts. Learn more at www.plaid.com/ftt Sign up for Alex's Fintech Takes newsletter for the latest insightful analysis on fintech trends, along with a heaping pile of pop culture references and copious footnotes. Every Monday and Thursday: https://workweek.com/brand/fintech-takes/  And for more exclusive insider content, don't forget to check out my YouTube page. Follow Jason: Newsletter: https://fintechbusinessweekly.substack.com/ LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/jasonmikula/   Follow Alex:  YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJgfH47QEwbQmkQlz1V9rQA/videos LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/alexhjohnsonTwitter: https://www.twitter.com/AlexH_Johnson

Listen and subscribe on Apple Podcasts | SpotifyHey all, Jason here.Alex Johnson, creator of the Fintech Takes newsletter, and I are happy to bring you the latest episode of our monthly podcast, Fintech Recap, where we unpack some of the biggest stories in fintech, banking, and crypto.In this episode, Alex and I had the chance to discuss:* The HBO drama “Industry” tackles banking and fintech and it gets dark (SPOILER WARNING)* Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong rug pulls crypto market structure legislation* Are proposals for a 10% credit card cap and the re-emergence of the Credit Card Competition Act mere bargaining chips?* Affirm applies for an ILC charter* Capital One to acquire expense management and corp card startup Brex* And, as always, what Alex and I just can't let go of Get full access to Fintech Business Weekly at fintechbusinessweekly.substack.com/subscribe

In this episode of One Vision — FinTech Fuse, we took a deep dive into Walmart with Finovate's very own Julie Muhn. We started with Walmart's bold move to apply for an ILC charter in 2005, their foray into fintech with OnePay, and the wide array of services they now provide beyond retail. The conversation explored Walmart's integration of emerging technologies like AI and agentic commerce, as well as potential future developments and implications for traditional banks in retaining customer loyalty and trust in an increasingly digital financial landscape.00:00 Introduction and Guest Welcome01:07 Walmart's Evolution in Financial Services02:43 Walmart's Super App Ambitions03:41 Walmart's Diverse Service Offerings07:15 Challenges and Limitations of Walmart's App11:01 Agentic Commerce and Future Prospects18:31 Behavioral Data and Consumer Trust26:23 Conclusion and Final Thoughts

In this episode of One Vision — FinTech Fuse, we took a deep dive into Walmart with Finovate's very own Julie Muhn. We started with Walmart's bold move to apply for an ILC charter in 2005, their foray into fintech with OnePay, and the wide array of services they now provide beyond retail. The conversation explored Walmart's integration of emerging technologies like AI and agentic commerce, as well as potential future developments and implications for traditional banks in retaining customer loyalty and trust in an increasingly digital financial landscape.00:00 Introduction and Guest Welcome01:07 Walmart's Evolution in Financial Services02:43 Walmart's Super App Ambitions03:41 Walmart's Diverse Service Offerings07:15 Challenges and Limitations of Walmart's App11:01 Agentic Commerce and Future Prospects18:31 Behavioral Data and Consumer Trust26:23 Conclusion and Final Thoughts

Sean and Varn are back to talk current events, discuss theory and gripe about everyone and everything. On the tumbrils this week: artificial intelligence, the DSA, sovereign debt, multipolarity and how not to debate with Colin Drumm online. In the second half we talk about 'The Mamdani Moment', Varn's recent ascension to Chief Fly-in-the-Ointment in the DSA, the pre-political theories of the ILC and how the ruling class are dragging us all into the hellfire.For the full episode, and all past Divings into the Wreckage, support this show at http://patreon.com/thiswreckageSong: Gary Numan - This Wreckage

While researchers work to improve lobular breast cancer screening, innovative treatments are improving outcomes for patients with a condition diagnosed in more than 40,000 Americans each year. Ohio State medical oncologist Arya Roy, MD, shares details about lobular breast cancer, also called invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC), including risks, symptoms and treatments.

Evropska unija želi z Aktom o umetni inteligenci spodbuditi zanesljiv in varen razvoj umetne inteligence, ki bo spoštoval temeljne človekove pravice, hkrati pa podpiral inovacije in zagotovil, da bo Evropa postala vodilna na tem področju. Nova zakonodaja naj bi v celoti začela veljati prihodnje leto. Kje je Slovenija na poti regulacije, kaj pomeni za regulacijo iniciativa »Stop-the-Clock«? Kateri sistemi umetne inteligence države že uporabljajo in zakaj bi potrebovali register umetne inteligence? Kako avtomatizacija vpliva na življenja ljudi in ali je visokotehnološki kapitalizem združljiv z demokracijo in varovanjem človekovih pravic? Pogovor je bil prvič objavljen v oddaji Intelekta. Gostje: Jasmina Ploštajner, Inštitut Danes je nov dan; Darja Petric Štrbenk, Ministrstvo za digitalno preobrazbo; dr. Ana Sobočan, Fakulteta za socialno delo Univerze v Ljubljani; dr. Blaž Vrečko Ilc, Fakulteta za družbene vede Univerze v Ljubljani. Avtorica oddaje Urška Henigman.

The Jacksonville Jumbo Shrimp won the International League Championship after defeating the Scranton/Wilkes-Barre RailRaiders 2-1 in the ILC series. Next, they play for the AAA National Championship Saturday evening in Las Vegas. Harold Craw, Exeutive Vice President & General Manager of the Jumbo Shrimp, joins JMN to recap yesterday's game and promote this weekend's national title shot. It's one game, winner takes all, and you can hear it on ESPN690 or watch it on ESPN. First pitch is at 10:05pm EST!

Scott Kornberg, the Voice of the Jumbo Shrimp, joins JMN. The ILC series is split 1-1, and tonight's Game-3 vs. Scranton/Wilkes-Barre RailRaiders winners will be crowned the International League Champions. No pressure, right? But wait, there's more -- tonight's winners will face off against the Pacific Coast League champions in the AAA National Championship game Sept 27 in Las Vegas. The last time Jacksonville won the AAA championship was in 1968. The Jumbo Shrimp have a chance to make history for the Crustacean Nation!

Evropska unija želi z Aktom o umetni inteligenci spodbuditi zanesljiv in varen razvoj umetne inteligence, ki bo spoštoval temeljne človekove pravice, hkrati pa podpiral inovacije in zagotovil, da bo Evropa postala vodilna na tem področju. Nova zakonodaja naj bi v celoti začela veljati prihodnje leto. Kje je Slovenija na poti regulacije, kaj pomeni za regulacijo iniciativa »Stop-the-Clock«? Kateri sistemi umetne inteligence države že uporabljajo in zakaj bi potrebovali register umetne inteligence? Kako avtomatizacija vpliva na življenja ljudi in ali je visokotehnološki kapitalizem združljiv z demokracijo in varovanjem človekovih pravic? Odgovore smo iskali v tokratni oddaji Intelekta, kjer so se nam pridružili Jasmina Ploštajner z Inštituta Danes je nov dan, Darja Petric Štrbenk z Ministrstva za digitalno preobrazbo, izr. prof. dr. Ana Sobočan s Fakultete za socialno delo Univerze v Ljubljani in politolog doc. dr. Blaž Vrečko Ilc s Fakultete za družbene vede Univerze v Ljubljani.

In our 102nd episode, Mike Couillard and Jeremy Brewer discuss the how the trade deadline has impacted the fantasy futures of players dealt along with those stepping into new roles before diving into the standard injury and callup news and notes. Then we make select cards to enter the pod PC for the July Players of the Month.You can find us on bluesky at @cardscategories.bsky.social, @mcouill7.bsky.social, and @jbrewer17.bsky.social. Email the pod at cardscategories@gmail.com.We have Cards & Categories swag for purchase here!Links to things discussed in the pod:TRADE DEADLINE FALLOUTAll of the trades around the 2025 deadlineMLBTR's trade tracker by teamBiggest trades discussed:Carlos Correa shipped back to HoustonEugenio Suarez rejoins the M'sPadres acquire Mason Miller and JP Sears for package that includes Leo De VriesPadres also add Ramon Laureano and Ryan O'HearnRangers acquire Merrill KellyBlue Jays add Shane BieberMets trade for Cedric MullinsRisersJesus Sanchez & Jakob MarseeNew closers (Jose Ferrer, JoJo Romero, Randy Rodriguez, Dennis Santana)Kyle FinneganFreddy FerminKhal StephenDylan BeaversFallersEugenio SuarezOld closers (David Bednar, Camilo Doval, Ryan Helsley, Mason Miller)Incumbent closers losing role (Will Vest)Former starting-ish bats heading to part-time roles (Willi Castro, Jose Caballero, Will Wagner)Gavin SheetsNews & Notes Discussion (1:02:45)A tibia contusion shelves Jacob MisiorowskiJackson Chourio heads to IL with hamstring strainJonathan Aranda breaks wrist on collision in the field, possibly done for seasonGrayson Rodriguez undergoing elbow debridement surgeryAustin Riley returns to IL with same abdominal injury from last monthMichael Soroka leaves first Cubs start with bum shoulder, lands on ILRight ankle sprain sends Tommy Edman to ILC.J. Kayfus promoted to the big leaguesContentious meeting in Phillies clubhouse between players and Rob Manfred sets stage for labor negotiationsTopps officially will allow Chrome Update cards for the MVP Buyback programUpcoming baseball card release schedule:8/6: 2025 Topps Archives Signature Series Active Players Edition8/12: 2025 Topps Finest8/13: 2025 Panini Prizm8/15: 2025 Panini Boys Of Summer8/29: 2025 Panini ImpeccableCARDS DISCUSSION (1:44:10)July POTM PC (link to Razzball post)MLB article on July's winnersC&C Pod PC listNick KurtzJ: 2025 Choice Las Vegas AviatorsM: 2025 Topps Now #464Kyle StowersJ: 2025 Topps Series 2 Golden Mirror Image Variation #399 M: 2025 Topps Now #ODB14 Road To Opening Day BonusNathan EovaldiJ: 2024 Topps Chrome Sapphire Red /5 #258 M: 2011 Bowman Chrome #BCP165 first autoPaul SkenesJ: 2023 Bowman Draft Mood Ring #MR-1M: 2024 Bowman Spotlights #BS1 gold refractor #/50Isaac CollinsJ: 2025 Topps Chrome #92 Frozen Fractor -1/0M: 2021 Choice Spokane Indians Isaac Collins

In this episode, hosts welcome back Jeremy Wells, author, brand strategist, and co-owner of The Ozarker Lodge and the newly reimagined Parker Hotel in Colorado.Jeremy shares what it's been like since opening The Ozarker Lodge—lessons learned, community wins, and how indie spirit fuels every project. He also dives into his second book, Indie Hotels, a heartfelt blend of memoir and hospitality insights that's already making waves across the industry.Joining the conversation is Stephen Chan, co-founder of Eagle Point Hotel Partners, the investment group behind both The Ozarker Lodge and Parker Hotel. Stephen gives us a behind-the-scenes look at the $24M Parker property acquisition and talks trends in boutique hotel investing, including their new stealth-mode venture, Arbus Hospitality.We explore:How Jeremy and Stephen approach branding, design, and repositioningThe importance of community integration for boutique propertiesLessons from growing a hotel brand post-COVIDWhy the independent hotel scene continues to thriveThe future of ILC and its mission to inspire collaborationWatch the FULL EPISODE on YouTube: https://youtu.be/KuAExHR7BHAJoin the conversation on today's episode on The Modern Hotelier LinkedIn pageThe Modern Hotelier is produced, edited, and published by Make More MediaLinks:Jeremy WellsJeremy on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/wellsjeremy/ Longitude°: https://longitudedesign.com/INDIE HOTEL: Why Hoteliers Are Breaking Free from Chains and Choosing Independence Book: https://www.amazon.com/INDIE-HOTEL-Hoteliers-Breaking-Independence/dp/B0CHL4713KStephen ChanStephen on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/stephen-chan-1b70142b/Eagle Point Hotel Partners: https://www.eaglepointhotels.com/For full show notes head to: https://themodernhotelier.com/episode/189Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-...Connect with Steve and David:Steve: https://www.linkedin.com/in/%F0%9F%8E...David: https://www.linkedin.com/in/david-mil.

In this episode, hosts David Millili and Steve Carran sit down with the dynamic Meg Gutowski, Executive Director of the Independent Lodging Congress (ILC), live from ILC CONfab in Chicago. Meg shares her unconventional journey from catering weddings to leading one of the most vibrant communities in independent hospitality.She opens up about what makes ILC truly special—from building real partnerships with host properties to curating events where business gets done, but fun is never far behind. From rooftop cocktails to Miami shenanigans, you'll hear how Meg and the ILC team are redefining what it means to connect in this industry.Whether you're an independent hotelier, event producer, or just love hospitality done differently, this episode is packed with insight, laughs, and a whole lot of heart.Watch the FULL EPISODE on YouTube: https://youtu.be/DmZ_h4o24KMJoin the conversation on today's episode on The Modern Hotelier LinkedIn pageThe Modern Hotelier is produced, edited, and published by Make More MediaLinks:Meg on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/meg-gutowski-09b33972/ILC: https://ilcongress.com/For full show notes head to: https://themodernhotelier.com/episode/188Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-...Connect with Steve and David:Steve: https://www.linkedin.com/in/%F0%9F%8E...David: https://www.linkedin.com/in/david-mil.

I was joined this week by Murtaza Ali, CEO & Co-Founder of Symphony (YC F24), for a conversation about how he's tackling some of the biggest challenges in the insurance industry with cutting-edge voice AI — without losing sight of the human touch.A bit of context: Murtaza's journey insurtech journey started at McKinsey before joining Tractable to build out their platform. He's seen firsthand how AI can transform industries — but also where it can fall short without humanity in the loop. That insight became the driving force behind Symphony AI.What we covered in this episode:

Michael Starr (New York Post) kicks off the show to talk about his new book Nothin' Comes Easy: The Life of Rodney Dangerfield. Starr has also written biographies of Don Rickles, Bob Newhart, Bobby Darin, Raymond Burr, William Shatner, Redd Foxx and Ringo Starr among others. Randy Wenger, Chief Counsel with Independence Law Center, gives insight into the U.S. Supreme Court ruling on the Medina v Planned Parenthood South Atlantic case as well as the work of ILC. Ziggy Marley also jumps in to share about his new children's book Pajammin' (a play on the title of his father Bob Marley's song "Jammin'"), his September concerts in Pennsylvania & Maryland and his U.R.G.E. Foundation. Theodora DeMoss, the youngest of the DeMoss children, helps put the finishing touches on the show by assisting dear ol' dad with Now THAT'S Punny!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Il a découvert la voile à l'adolescence, entre Toulouse et Gruissan, dans une famille baignée par l'aéronautique - loin des capitales de la régate. C'est aux côtés de son père Ortwin, pionnier d'Airbus, que Stephan Kandler fait ses premières armes, en croisière puis en course, avant de professionnaliser cette passion au sein de K Yachting. Très actif dans les années 1990 sur les circuits ILC 40, Mumm 30 ou Corel 45, il construit des programmes ambitieux en équipage, repère de futurs grands noms (Juan Kouyoumdjian, Guillaume Verdier) et attire les meilleurs navigateurs français des circuits inshore.En 2001, à 30 ans, il se lance dans l'aventure Coupe de l'America avec la création de K-Challenge. Six ans plus tard, son équipe représente la France à Valence sous le nom Areva Challenge, après avoir frôlé la banqueroute. Le défi français se classe sixième de la Louis Vuitton Cup et parvient à rivaliser avec des écuries bien mieux dotées. L'avenir s'annonce prometteur - Stephan Kandler assure avoir alors réuni un budget de 60 millions d'euros grâce à un mécène et un partenaire -, mais le conflit judiciaire entre Oracle et Alinghi gèle tout projet de suite et tout s'effondre.Il rebondit en TP52 avec All4One durant trois saisons, sans parvenir à revenir dans la Coupe et prend ce qu'il pense être sa retraite de la voile pour se tourner vers les vignes pendant près de huit ans. Kandler revient à la voile en 2021, motivé par l'évolution technologique des supports et l'essor de SailGP. Il s'associe à Bruno Dubois et relance K-Challenge, avec l'objectif de concourir à la 37e America's Cup à Barcelone. C'est le groupe Accor, via sa marque Orient Express, qui relance définitivement la machine fin 2022. En deux ans à peine, un AC75 est construit chez Multiplast, issu du design package des Kiwis et l'équipe s'aligne dans les délais.Sur le plan sportif, Quentin Delapierre et les siens créent la surprise en remportant la première régate officielle à Villanova en AC40. Mais le manque d'entraînement sur l'AC75 et l'inexpérience de ce type de support pénalisent la suite du parcours. Malgré une victoire symbolique contre Alinghi, le défi tricolore ne se qualifie pas pour les demi-finales. Une "déception" sportive, Kandler ne s'en cache pas.Aujourd'hui, K-Challenge poursuit l'aventure à travers sa présence en SailGP, où elle aligne le même équipage qu'en America's Cup. L'équipe s'est ancrée à Lorient, via des activités technologiques (hydrogène, software embarqué, simulateur) qui nourrissent à la fois la performance et des débouchés industriels.Alors que la 38e édition de la Coupe se profile à Naples en 2027, Stéphane Kandler affiche son ambition : capitaliser sur l'expérience de Barcelone pour construire une équipe encore plus compétitive. La France a (re)pris pied dans la Coupe. Il reste désormais à s'y imposer. Et Stephan Kandler en est sûr : jamais cela n'a été aussi possible.Diffusé le 30 Mai 2025Générique : In Closing – Days PastPost-production : Grégoire LevillainHébergé par Ausha. Visitez ausha.co/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

In this episode of FinTech Layer Cake, host Reggie Young speaks with Michele Alt, Co-Founder of Klaros Group, about new opportunities in fintech bank charters.They unpack the recent SmartBiz approval, what it signals for the industry, and the realities of the charter process—from regulatory hurdles to risk management. Michele also shares why now might be the best time in years to act—and why ILC charters could be the next big thing.If you're thinking about chartering, partnering, or future-proofing your fintech, this episode is a must-listen.

When it comes to fintechs getting bank charters we are entering a golden age. With zero fintech-oriented bank applications approved in the Biden administration we already have several fintechs with shiny new bank charters just a few months into the new administration. So, if you are a fintech and are thinking about bank charters now is the time.To break all this down, I was delighted to chat recently with Michele Alt, Co-Founder and Managing Director at Klaros Group. She was last on the show in 2021 and certainly a lot has changed since then. Michele takes us through the different types of charters and explains the different options for fintech companies seeking charters.On this podcast you will learn:The fundamental change in attitude for bank charters with the new administration in DC.The two paths that fintechs can take to get a bank charter.The pros and cons for each of these paths.Michele's thoughts on the SmartBiz acquisition of Centrust Bank.Why she thinks the timelines for bank acquisitions will be shorter from now on.The difference between an ILC charter and a regular bank charter.Why most ILC banks are located in Utah.Why some of the big names in fintech are applying for the MALPB charter in Georgia.Why Wyoming created the SPDI charter.How the Federal Reserve is reacting to this change in the new bank formation environment.Why some of the crypto companies are looking for federal bank charters.Michele's perspective on the big tech companies getting bank charters.What she would say if Amazon came calling looking to explore an ILC charter.What the fintech banking landscape might look like at the end of the Trump administration.Connect with Fintech One-on-One: Tweet me @PeterRenton Connect with me on LinkedIn Find previous Fintech One-on-One episodes

Join us for an episode recorded in August 2024, with Huw Llewellyn, the former Director of the Codification Division of the United Nations Office of Legal Affairs and former Secretary to the International Law Commission (ILC), in a conversation about the evolution of international law. We cover the history of the ILC, its role in the evolution of international law, and its relationship with the UN Sixth Committee. Huw shares insights from his 42-year career, revealing the Commission's approach to codification and progressive development of the law. The episode also explores the historical milestones that shaped international law, from the Peace of Westphalia in 1648 to the League of Nations. Huw talks about how stability and change in international relations is reflected in the work of the ILC, tells us more about the Commission's achievements over 75 years, and new areas of work on the agenda including the topic of sea level rise. We conclude with a personal glimpse into Huw's retirement plans and his recommendations for crime thriller enthusiasts (Lee Child and Martin Walker)! Resources: Ask a Librarian! International Law Commission: https://legal.un.org/ilc/ Resource guide: https://libraryresources.unog.ch/legal/legal/ILC   Where to listen to this episode  Apple podcasts:  https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-next-page/id1469021154 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/10fp8ROoVdve0el88KyFLy YouTube: https://youtu.be/FZX3y3SADV4 Content    Guest: Huw Llewellyn Host: Amy Smith, UN Library & Archives Geneva Production and editing: Amy Smith Recorded & produced at the United Nations Library & Archives Geneva 

This is a recording of the ILC's fourth public assembly at Woodbine Space in Queens on March 29th, 2025 featuring Cyrus Cappo of John Jay College CUNY, Daniel Jacobs of Sublation/Platypus Affiliated and Ryan Castello of the Maoist Communists Union.For more info on the Independent Labor Club of North America-including upcoming events, how to join, how to start a chapter, etc-visit the website at https://ilclabor.com/Song: Dodos - Trades and Tariffs

Is there power behind organized chaos? Today, Dan Ryan engages with Meg Gutowski, Vice President of the Independent Lodging Congress (ILC). They discuss the essence of hospitality, the role of ILC in fostering connections among industry professionals, and the unique blend of events hosted by ILC that emphasize genuine human interactions over transactional relationships. Meg shares insights from her extensive experience in the hospitality industry, including planning initiatives, organizing events, and the importance of creating meaningful experiences for attendees. They also delve into personal anecdotes and the intricacies of balancing organized chaos in event planning. The episode emphasizes the transformative power of hospitality and the vital role of independent lodging in the industry.Takeaways: Emphasize the mission of hospitality to care for people on their journeys. This core purpose should guide all actions and decisions.Strive to create experiences that blend the unexpected with fulfilling guest expectations, making their stays magical but ensuring they feel taken care of.Use unique and less formalized settings, like walk-and-talks, immersive experiences, and local tours, to encourage organic interactions and deeper connections among attendees.Building authentic relationships is crucial. In the hospitality industry, human connection and genuine interactions can set your business apart.Engage with local businesses and community members to enhance the collective experience for visitors.Choose venues and spaces that are comfortable and stimulating for guests, considering their comfort during events and interactions.Quote of the Show:“ Trying to figure out the right combination so that it feels very magical, but also you feel like you're taken care of. That's how hospitality has been running through my brain.” - Meg GutowskiLinks:LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/meg-gutowski-09b33972/ Website: https://ilcongress.com/ Shout Outs:0:48 - Corinthian Yacht Club https://www.corinthianyc.org/ 1:47 - Bashar Wali https://www.linkedin.com/in/basharwali/ 5:45 - Andrew Benioff https://www.linkedin.com/in/llenrockgroupbenioff/ 7:18 - Cavallo Point Lodge https://www.cavallopoint.com/ 16:50 - Elyse Kirby https://www.linkedin.com/in/jelysekirby/ 17:25 - Sage Hotels https://sagehospitalitygroup.com/ 21:57 - Marquise Stilwell https://www.linkedin.com/in/quise/ 24:01 - Morris Adjmi Architects https://ma.com/ 24:05 - MethodCo https://www.methodco.com/ 25:07 - Alexis Lanman https://www.linkedin.com/in/alexis-lanman-b0b39487/ 25:08 - Jen Parks https://www.linkedin.com/in/jenniferfigariparks/ 32:35 - Highgate https://www.highgate.com/ 38:38 - Paul Tamburello https://www.linkedin.com/in/paul-tamburello-80638512/ 39:16 - Little Man Ice Cream https://www.littlemanicecream.com/ 46:27 - Amy Michaelson Kelly https://www.linkedin.com/in/amy-michaelson-kelly-a547a717/ 46:30 - Lark https://www.larkhotels.com/ 46:41 - Shelton Steele https://www.linkedin.com/in/shelton-steele-39521566/ 46:42 - Wrong Way Campground https://www.wrongwaycampground.com/ 

Nine years with no evidence of disease—yet Megan-Claire Chase's cancer journey isn't over. As she once fought cancer alongside her mother, she now faces something even harder: losing her. In this episode, Megan-Claire shares a deeply vulnerable side—a daughter losing her mother. Facing your own mortality is one thing, but facing the mortality of your loved ones—friends, family, fellow cancer patients, and survivors—and the hole they leave behind is something entirely different. Key Highlights: Witnessing her mother's cancer progression brings anticipatory grief, yet despite that grief, Megan strives to learn as much about her mother as possible, including fond memories from her childhood. Despite the anticipatory grief, Megan and her mother engage in a bonding exercise using question cards, and she records their conversations. One of the most meaningful things she learned was that her mother reflects on her life with joy—ultimately, the greatest goal is to leave this world happy. Facing your own mortality can unearth many emotions: the need to be confident and not tolerate disrespect, the desire to live life on your own terms and to the fullest, yet also a deep sense of loneliness and isolation. About our guest: Check out the first episode Megan-Claire Chase appeared in here.  Megan-Claire Chase, also known as Warrior Megsie, is the Breast Cancer Program Director and host of the Our BC Life podcast at SHARE Cancer Support. As an invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) breast cancer survivor and passionate patient advocate based in Atlanta, GA, Megan-Claire is a dedicated champion for the needs of breast cancer patients, particularly in addressing the disparities faced by minoritized communities and those in the adolescent and young adult (AYA) communities. In addition to her pivotal role at SHARE, she serves on Bayer Oncology's Digital Patient Council, is a patient advocate for the Oncology Data Advisor Editorial Board, and recently joined the Worth the Wait Charity advisory board. She also contributes as a writer and advisory board member for Patient Power, amplifying the voices of breast cancer patients. Megan-Claire's advocacy efforts include participating as a panelist on Leveraging Technology to Support Patient-Centered Multidisciplinary Oncologic Care at the 2024 ASCO Quality Care Symposium, co-authoring a podcast and infographic on genetic testing in metastatic breast cancer, collaborating with Pfizer on the Action Guide to Disrupt Inequitable Health Outcomes, and sharing her personal journey on PBS's Beyond Cancer through Stories from the Stage. Her work has been spotlighted in notable publications like The New York Times, People Magazine, Cancer Health, Cancer Today, and CURE Magazine. Beyond her cancer advocacy, Megan-Claire is a versatile voiceover actor, a dedicated social justice activist, and a proud cat mom to Phoebe. Disclaimer: All content and information provided in connection with Manta Cares is solely intended for informational and educational purposes only.  This content and information is not intended to be a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition. Looking for tools to help you take control of your cancer experience? Check out My Cancer GPS™, a step-by-step map that guides you through the entire cancer experience.

In this episode, the team reflects on an exceptional year for the Modern Hotelier podcast, which gained recognition as a top hospitality podcast and more than doubled its follower base across LinkedIn, YouTube, and Instagram.The hosts reminisce about attending key industry events like HITEC, ILC in Sausalito, and the Hospitality Show, sharing their favorite moments and interviews. They also discuss the biggest lessons learned over the year and express gratitude to their guests, sponsors, and followers, teasing exciting announcements for 2025.Happy Holidays and Merry Christmas from the Modern Hotelier team!Join the conversation on today's episode on The Modern Hotelier LinkedIn pageThe Modern Hotelier is produced, edited, and published by Make More MediaLinks:For full show notes head to: https://themodernhotelier.com/episode/126Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-...Connect with Steve and David:Steve: https://www.linkedin.com/in/%F0%9F%8E...David: https://www.linkedin.com/in/david-mil...

Dr. Linda Chu is joined by Dr. Matthew Covington and Dr. Regina Rosenthal to discuss the challenges in diagnosing and treating invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) of the breast. They explore imaging difficulties, unique metastatic patterns, and strategies for improving detection and patient care. Sponsored by GE HealthCare.

On November 9th, 2024 the Independent Labor Club of NY hosted a panel at Woodbine in Ridgewood, Queens. Sean moderated this discussion between:Aaron Lelonde of the International Longshoremen's AssociationSou Mi of WGA-East and Left VoiceGregory Butler of Int'l Union of Operating Engineers and Gangbox NewsEllie Pfeffer of Maoist Communist Union, formerly of Amazonians UnitedWhat accounts for the realignment seen in 2024? Did large swathes of workers (including Black and Hispanic) vote Trump solely from racism and misogyny? What was the role of organized labor in the recent election? What effects might the results of the election have on the prospects for organizing labor in the future?If you like what you hear, support our podcast and access great bonus content: www.patreon.com/theantifadaIf you're interested in joining the ILC, we have chapters across the country and in Australia: https://ilclabor.com/The event was held @woodbine.nyc in Ridgewood, Queens Saturday November 9th. Contribute to Woodbine's Fall Fundraiser drive.Song - Capital STEEZ x Joey Bada$$ - Survival Tactics

Independent hotels are the creative spark for the Hospitality Industry. So, what's the current state of the Independent Hospitality sector?In this episode, David and Steve head to the Independent Lodging Congress in Sausalito, CA to talk about the latest insights and challenges happening in the Independent hotel space. On this episode, we hear from Dan Jacobs, the Chef/Owner, of award-winning restaurants, Dandan & EsterEv, in Milwaukee, Gaurav (GB) Sharma, Founder of MOSAIC, Audrey Yates, the VP of Hotel Partnerships at Stash Hotel Rewards, and Brian Polster the Creative Director at THREE SIXTY.Key Topics:What is the company's role in the hospitality industryHow does ILC compare to other industry eventsWhat makes ILC unique in terms of networking and atmosphereHow are businesses preparing for upcoming industry changesThe Industry Innovation The Modern Hotelier is the official podcast of the Independent Lodging CongressJoin the conversation on today's episode on The Modern Hotelier LinkedIn pageThe Modern Hotelier is produced, edited, and published by Make More MediaLinks:Dan Jacobs: https://www.linkedin.com/in/dan-jacobs-ba774327b/Gaurav Sharma: https://www.linkedin.com/in/gbnewyork/Audrey Yates: https://www.linkedin.com/in/audrey-yates-0b5331b4/Brian Polster: https://www.linkedin.com/in/brianpolster/  EsterEv | Milwaukee Private Dining Restaurant: https://chefdanjacobs.com/MOSAIC: https://mosaicinabox.com/Stash Hotel Rewards: https://www.stashrewards.com/THREE SIXTY: https://threesixtymke.com/For full show notes head to: https://themodernhotelier.com/episode/103Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-...Connect with Steve and David:Steve: https://www.linkedin.com/in/%F0%9F%8E...David: https://www.linkedin.com/in/david-mil...

Audio from ILC's first Independent Labor Assembly July 7th, 2024 assembly at Talon Bar in Brooklyn with guest Gregory ButlerFor the full episode, Discord access, and all our bonus content, support the show at http:///patreon.com/theantifadaThe Independent Labor Club is an organization that seeks to bring workers together from all over to build bonds of free association and strengthen the power of labor. Our guest speaker Gregory A. Butler is a lifelong New Yorker as well as a carpenter in local 608, United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America. With decades of experience in the trades, he focuses on the history of working class struggle and union organizing in New York. He is the author of Disunited Brotherhood: Race, Racketeering and the Fall of the New York Construction Unions and is owner and moderator of Gangbox: Construction Workers News Service on the yahoo groups network.Song: Johnny Cash - One Piece At A Time