Podcasts about Pareto

Work with Jordan personally at ⁠⁠www.ecommerceos.co⁠⁠Work with social commerce club at ⁠⁠www.socialcommerceclub.com⁠⁠Get 27 strategies in 27 days at ⁠⁠https://socialcommerceclub.com/pages/27-strategies⁠⁠Join Tiktok shop elites mastermind at ⁠⁠https://www.skool.com/tiktokshopelite/aboutUnlock the power of TikTok Shop as your ultimate top-of-funnel engine. In this video, Jordan West reveals the proven system his agency uses to turn TikTok Shop into a content machine that fuels Meta ads, Amazon, DTC, and retail growth. Learn how to harvest winning creator content, whitelist it, scale it, and syndicate it everywhere—so you never run out of high-performing ads again.Whether you're running a DTC brand or managing enterprise-level campaigns, this strategy will help you stop guessing which ads will work and start scaling with precision.

Are you drowning in “to-dos” that don't actually move the needle? In this episode, Alex Greenwood breaks down how the 80/20 rule—Pareto's Principle—can rescue PR pros from busywork hell. Learn why most press releases, vanity rankings, and ribbon cuttings belong in the bottom 80%, and how to focus on the few efforts that truly build trust, awareness, and credibility.

In this episode of the Always On Podcast, host Duncan McPherson sits down with Jeff Ambrose, a Pareto certified business consultant and innovative recruiter, to discuss the “advisor flight plan.” This strategic framework is designed to help financial advisors transition smoothly to new environments. Jeff shares his expertise on the evolving financial landscape and the … Continue reading Navigating Transitions: The Advisor Flight Plan with Jeff Ambrose (Ep. 84) →

https://www.astralcodexten.com/p/sources-say-bay-area-house-party [previously in series: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7] Something is off about this Bay Area House Party. There are . . . women. “I've never seen a gender balance like this in the Bay Area,” you tell your host Chris. “Is this one of those fabled ratio parties?” “No - have you heard of curtfishing? It's the new male dating trend. You say in your Bumble profile that you're a member of the Dissident Right who often attends parties with Curtis Yarvin. Then female journos ask you out in the hopes that you'll bring them along and they can turn it into an article.” “What happens when they realize Curtis Yarvin isn't at the party?” “Oh, everyone pools their money and hires someone to pretend to be Curtis. You can just do things. Today it's Ramchandra.” You follow his gaze, and there is Ramchandra, hair greased back, wearing a leather jacket, surrounded by a crowd of young women. “When I say I'm against furries,” he's explaining, staccato, at 120 wpm, “I mean the sort of captured furries you get under the post-Warren-G-Harding liberal order, the ones getting the fat checks from the Armenians at Harvard and the Department of Energy. I love real furries, the kind you would have found in 1920s New Mexico eating crocodile steaks with Baron von Ungern-Sternberg! Some of my best friends are furries, as de Broglie-Bohm and my sainted mother used to say! Just watch out for the Kikuyu, that's my advice! Hahahahahaha!” Some of the women are taking notes. “But enough about me. When I was seventeen, I spent seven weeks in Bensonhurst - that's in the Rotten Apple, in case you can't tell your Nepalis from your Neapolitans. A dear uncle of mine, after whom I was named…” “Ramchandra is pretty good,” you admit. “Still, if it were me I would have gone with a white guy.” “It's fine,” says Chris. “Curtis describes himself as a mischling, and none of the journos know what that means.” Ramchandra is still talking. “Of course, strawberries have only been strawberries since after the Kronstadt Rebellion. Before that, strawberries were just pears. You had to get them hand-painted red by Gypsies, if you can believe that. Gypsies! So if you hear someone from west of Pennsylvania Avenue mention ‘strawberries', that's what we in the business call il significanto.” “I admit he has talent,“ you say. “But this curtfishing thing - surely at some point your date realizes that you're not actually a high-status yet problematic bad boy who can further her career just by existing, and then she ghosts you, right?” “That's every date in San Francisco. But when you curtfish, sometimes she comps your meal from her expense account. It's a strict Pareto improvement!” After some thought, you agree this is a great strategy with no downsides, maybe the biggest innovation in dating since the invention of alcohol. Having failed to bring your own journo to the party, you look for one who seems unattached. You catch the eye of a blonde woman who introduces herself as Gabrielle, and you try to give her the least autistic “Hello” of which you are capable.

Key Highlights from the Episode:0:00 – Introduction3:21 – Professional scarcity: why focusing on fewer clients creates greater impact5:12 – Shifting from book of business to real business7:10 – Why client experience outweighs investment performance9:15 – The law of familiarity and loyalty fatigue14:23 – How to reset client relationships during a transition18:16 – Fee worthiness and setting rules of engagement25:03 – How processes and intellectual property drive valuation29:12 – Depersonalizing your practice to build enterprise value31:40 – The role of AI in practice management34:17 – Balancing high-tech with high-touch in client relationships40:23 – Breaking the status quo to unlock potentialResources:Elite Consulting Partners | Financial Advisor Transitions: https://eliteconsultingpartners.com  Elite Marketing Concepts | Marketing Services for Financial Advisors: https://elitemarketingconcepts.com  Elite Advisor Successions | Advisor Mergers and Acquisitions: https://eliteadvisorsuccessions.com  JEDI Database Solutions | Data Intelligence for Advisors: https://jedidatabasesolutions.com  Connect with Duncan Macpherson on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/duncanmacpherson  Visit Pareto Systems: https://www.paretosystems.com  Download Duncan's AI Whitepaper: https://paretosystems.com/ai-strategies-for-financial-professionals.html  Listen to more Advisor Talk episodes: https://eliteconsultingpartners.com/podcasts/  Follow us on LinkedIn: https://linkedin.com/company/eliteconsultingpartners   

Tom Drummond, Managing Partner at Heavybit, joins the show to break down what it takes to build and scale AI “picks and shovels” companies for the enterprise. We dive into the realities of selling into one of the hardest markets to reach, why differentiation matters more than ever, and how startups can wedge their way into massive opportunities despite fierce competition.Key Takeaways• Enterprise attention is more competitive than ever—breaking through requires clarity and category creation.• Cold email and traditional outbound are saturated—startups must iterate quickly on channels and messaging.• Landing enterprise deals often starts with developers and end users, not CIOs—grassroots adoption is powerful.• Narrow wedges matter—solve one painful, high-value problem better than anyone else, then expand.• Timing the industry cycle is critical—knowing when markets fragment and when they consolidate can define outcomes.Timestamped Highlights02:03 — Why enterprise attention has never been harder to win04:55 — Differentiation in a sea of lookalike AI infrastructure startups07:34 — Cold email vs content, billboards, and unconventional channels08:35 — The Pareto rule of enterprise revenue and why developer adoption is key11:47 — Competing with big tech incumbents: the power of the narrow wedge21:03 — Where the market is headed: cycles of expansion, contraction, and consolidationA line that stuck“You don't win by being another tool—you win by defining the category everyone else has to fit into.”Call to ActionIf you enjoyed this conversation, share it with a founder or tech leader who's navigating the enterprise market. Make sure to follow the show for more unfiltered conversations with people shaping the future of software and AI.

Succesul in antreprenoriat nu tine doar de munca sau investitii. Multi muncesc mult, dar fara rezultate, din cauza deciziilor gresite. Altii gandesc strategic, actioneaza rapid si cresc. Totul tine de cateva principii esentiale — in acest material iti prezint cinci dintre ele, care m-au ajutat si pot face diferenta si in afacerea ta. Ramai cu noi pana la final! Hai sa tinem legatura: Academia Gomag: https://academia.gomag.ro/  Blog: https://www.gomag.ro/blog/  Comunitatea Gomag: https://www.facebook.com/groups/gomagro/  Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/gomag.ro/  TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@gomag.ro 1. Regula lui Pareto: 80/20 Cea mai cunoscuta este regula lui Pareto, care spune ca 80% din rezultate vin din 20% din actiunile noastre. Ce invatam din asta? Sa ne concentram pe ceea ce conteaza cu adevarat, nu pe task-uri inutile, micromanagement sau un stil pompieristic de lucru. Daca ai un business in eCommerce, sigur ai observat ca cele mai multe vanzari vin de la un numar mic de produse. In platforma poti vedea rapid care sunt acestea — analizeaza-le, imbunatateste-le cu poze si testimoniale, iar produsele care nu se vand le poti combina in pachete pentru a reduce stocul. Aplica acest principiu si la canalele de marketing. Nu este suficient sa fii prezent pe toate, ci sa investesti acolo unde conteaza. Restul... le testezi, le evaluezi si adaptezi in functie de rezultate. Tot acest principiu se aplica si segmentarii clientilor. Uita-te in date. Business-ul tau trebuie sa fie "data-driven". Vezi cine cumpara recurent, creeaza segmente de clienti si fidelizeaza-i. Trimite coduri de reducere, ofera preturi speciale si dezvolta relatii profitabile. 2. Gandirea „de la zero” In loc sa iti dai cu parerea sau sa copiezi alti jucatori din piata, opreste-te si reconstruieste gandirea de la zero. Descopera elementele fundamentale ale problemei si vezi cum poti aborda totul cu o perspectiva noua. De ex, daca vanzarile scad, nu da vina pe design sau pe agentie. Uita-te la produse, la paginile cu cel mai mare trafic. Intreaba-te sincer: de ce nu ai cumpara chiar tu acel produs? Compara cu competitia. Ce fac altii mai bine? Prezentare? Poze? Beneficii clare? Businessul se bazeaza pe date, cifre si logica. Nu pe intuitii si preferinte personale. 3. Gandirea pe termen lung Nu te opri la decizii cu efect imediat. Analizeaza impactul lor pe termen lung — atat pozitiv, cat si negativ. Decizia de a aduce o noua gama de produse sau de a intra pe un marketplace poate parea buna pe moment, dar iti poate distrage atentia de la esenta: brandul tau. Cresterea este rezultatul actiunilor constante, sustinute pe termen lung. Inclusiv strategiile de ofertare — nu totul se rezuma la a scadea pretul. Ofertele pot include beneficii, livrare gratuita, extra servicii. Pretul mic fara strategie duce la profit scazut. Poti folosi o strategie in care ai produse "locomotiva" — accesibile, care atrag clienti. Apoi faci upsell cu produse mai scumpe. Dar aici ai nevoie de funneluri si de o strategie clara. 4. Realitatea vs. Planul Poti avea cele mai bune planuri si tooluri. Dar, cum se spune, „planul de acasa nu se potriveste cu cel din targ”. Realitatea din piata este diferita si deseori mai complexa decat orice strategie scrisa. Fii pregatit sa testezi, sa adaptezi si, mai ales, sa schimbi directia rapid, in functie de feedbackul primit. Asculta vocea clientilor, uita-te in date si ia decizii logice. Nu lasa lucrurile la voia intamplarii. Adaptarea este cheia. Ce functioneaza pentru mine poate sa nu functioneze pentru tine. Trebuie sa adaptezi totul la businessul tau, la audienta ta si la nivelul tau de cunostinte. 5. Gandirea inversa Stiu ca vrem sa fim pozitivi, dar e important sa vedem si ce ar putea merge rau. Cand lansezi un produs, intreaba-te: ce riscuri exista? Ce blocaje pot aparea? Ce faci daca se intampla X sau Y? Daca pleaca un angajat-cheie? Daca vine competitia cu o oferta mai buna? Daca se schimba legislatia? Ai proceduri? Ai un plan B? Aceste intrebari iti vor reduce riscurile. Si mai important: te vor ajuta sa nu fii luat prin surprindere. Gandirea strategica inlocuieste impulsivitatea. Flexibilitatea si capacitatea de reactie rapida sunt cruciale. Revizuieste lunar modelele, mai ales cand iti planifici strategia si bugetul. Vezi ce functioneaza, ce nu si adapteaza in functie de realitate. Vrei sa-ti lansezi sau sa-ti cresti afacerea online? In cartea de mai jos gasesti strategii clare si modele utile in eCommerce — la un super pret, cu bonusuri si transport gratuit! Link:  https://bit.ly/carte-ecommerce

Eigentlich sollte Meinungsfreiheit in einer freiheitlichen Gesellschaft selbstverständlich sein. Doch was, wenn eine Gruppe die Regeln bricht? Soll man Gleiches mit Gleichem vergelten? Radikalenerlass: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radikal... Die 36 Strategeme: Print: https://www.amazon.de/exec/obidos/ASI... Als Hörbuch: https://payhip.com/b/4nBZl ►WEITERE INFORMATIONEN VON TEAM RIECK Spieltheorie: Vom Gefangenendilemma (GD) zur Kooperation Das GD zeigt den Konflikt zwischen individueller und kollektiver Rationalität: Defektion ist für den Einzelnen vorteilhaft, führt aber gemeinsam zum schlechteren Ergebnis (Nash-Gleichgewicht 1/1 statt 3/3). In wiederholten Spielen ermöglicht Tit-for-Tat (TfT) Kooperation: startend kooperativ, anschließend Spiegelung des letzten Zugs. Vorteile: nicht ausbeutbar (sofortige Sanktion), versöhnlich (sofortige Rückkehr), einfach. Risiko: Eskalation durch Fehlwahrnehmungen. Übertragen auf gesellschaftliche Konflikte: Polarisierung und „Cancel Culture“ funktionieren wie ein iteriertes GD. „Defektion“ ist der Versuch, die Gegenseite mundtot zu machen – kurzfristig bringt das Deutungshoheit, langfristig schadet es dem Diskurs. Gleiches gilt in der Außenpolitik: Reziprozität fördert Vertrauen. Cancel Culture: spieltheoretisch-historisch „Cancel Culture“ entstand um 2010 im afroamerikanischen Aktivismus als Entzug von Unterstützung bei problematischem Verhalten. Heute ist der Begriff politisiert und bezeichnet die strategische Anwendung sozialer oder beruflicher Sanktionen gegen unliebsame Meinungen. Historische Vorläufer zeigen: Der Mechanismus ist nicht neu. In der McCarthy-Ära (USA, 1950er) führten Verdächtigungen („Blacklisting“) zu sozialer und beruflicher Ächtung. Der deutsche Radikalenerlass (1972) zielte auf „Verfassungsfeinde“ im öffentlichen Dienst („Berufsverbote“). Gemeinsam ist die Verschiebung vom Argument zur Existenzebene. Abgrenzung zu legitimer Kritik: Kritik greift Argumente an und bleibt im Diskurs. Systematisches „Canceln“ zielt auf Status, Beruf und soziale Integration – also auf Ausschluss aus dem Diskursraum. Es ist die strategische Defektion im gesellschaftlichen GD. Lösungsansätze: Von Defektion zu Kooperation Ziel ist ein stabiles, Pareto-superiores Gleichgewicht: Meinungsfreiheit + Respekt. • Dialog & Mediation: Formate des konstruktiven Journalismus verbinden Probleme mit Lösungen und wirken wie Moderation. • Digitale Diskurskultur: Plattform-Design und Moderation sollten Anreize verschieben. Nicht bloß Engagement belohnen (Empörung), sondern sachlichen Austausch. • Internationale Beispiele: Skandinavische Länder setzen auf starke, unabhängige ÖRR als vertrauenswürdige Instanzen – eine „übergeordnete Autorität“, die GD-Dynamiken zähmt. Kanada betont Medienkompetenz und Normen des respektvollen Diskurses – eine Verpflichtung zu wechselseitiger Kooperation. Fazit Freie Rede braucht Regeln der Reziprozität. Wer Defektion mit Defektion beantwortet, stabilisiert Polarisierung. Besser sind transparente Regeln, schnelle, proportionale Sanktionen bei Regelbruch und die Bereitschaft zur Rückkehr in die Kooperation. ►WEITERES VON CHRISTIAN RIECK ○ Instagram: /profrieck ○ Twitter: /profrieck ○ LinkedIn: /profrieck #profrieck #cancelculture #politik

My fellow pro-growth/progress/abundance Up Wingers,Artificial intelligence may prove to be one of the most transformative technologies in history, but like any tool, its immense power for good comes with a unique array of risks, both large and small.Today on Faster, Please! — The Podcast, I chat with Miles Brundage about extracting the most out of AI's potential while mitigating harms. We discuss the evolving expectations for AI development and how to reconcile with the technology's most daunting challenges.Brundage is an AI policy researcher. He is a non-resident fellow at the Institute for Progress, and formerly held a number of senior roles at OpenAI. He is also the author of his own Substack.In This Episode* Setting expectations (1:18)* Maximizing the benefits (7:21)* Recognizing the risks (13:23)* Pacing true progress (19:04)* Considering national security (21:39)* Grounds for optimism and pessimism (27:15)Below is a lightly edited transcript of our conversation. Setting expectations (1:18)It seems to me like there are multiple vibe shifts happening at different cadences and in different directions.Pethokoukis: Earlier this year I was moderating a discussion between an economist here at AEI and a CEO of a leading AI company, and when I asked each of them how AI might impact our lives, our economists said, ‘Well, I could imagine, for instance, a doctor's productivity increasing because AI could accurately and deeply translate and transcribe an appointment with a patient in a way that's far better than what's currently available.” So that was his scenario. And then I asked the same question of the AI company CEO, who said, by contrast, “Well, I think within a decade, all human death will be optional thanks to AI-driven medical advances.” On that rather broad spectrum — more efficient doctor appointments and immortality — how do you see the potential of this technology?Brundage: It's a good question. I don't think those are necessarily mutually exclusive. I think, in general, AI can both augment productivity and substitute for human labor, and the ratio of those things is kind of hard to predict and might be very policy dependent and social-norm dependent. What I will say is that, in general, it seems to me like the pace of progress is very fast and so both augmentation and substitutions seem to be picking up steam.It's kind of interesting watching the debate between AI researchers and economists, and I have a colleague who has said that the AI researchers sometimes underestimate the practical challenges in deployment at scale. Conversely, the economists sometimes underestimate just how quickly the technology is advancing. I think there's maybe some happy middle to be found, or perhaps one of the more extreme perspectives is true. But personally, I am not an economist, I can't really speak to all of the details of substitution, and augmentation, and all the policy variables here, but what I will say is that at least the technical potential for very significant amounts of augmentation of human labor, as well as substitution for human labor, seem pretty likely on even well less than 10 years — but certainly within 10 years things will change a lot.It seems to me that the vibe has shifted a bit. When I talk to people from the Bay Area and I give them the Washington or Wall Street economist view, to them I sound unbelievably gloomy and cautious. But it seems the vibe has shifted, at least recently, to where a lot of people think that major advancements like superintelligence are further out than they previously thought — like we should be viewing AI as an important technology, but more like what we've seen before with the Internet and the PC.It's hard for me to comment. It seems to me like there are multiple vibe shifts happening at different cadences and in different directions. It seems like several years ago there was more of a consensus that what people today would call AGI was decades away or more, and it does seem like that kind of timeframe has shifted closer to the present. There there's still debate between the “next few years” crowd versus the “more like 10 years” crowd. But that is a much narrower range than we saw several years ago when there was a wider range of expert opinions. People who used to be seen as on one end of the spectrum, for example, Gary Marcus and François Chollet who were seen as kind of the skeptics of AI progress, even they now are saying, “Oh, it's like maybe 10 years or so, maybe five years for very high levels of capability.” So I think there's been some compression in that respect. That's one thing that's going on.There's also a way in which people are starting to think less abstractly and more concretely about the applications of AI and seeing it less as this kind of mysterious thing that might happen suddenly and thinking of it more as incremental, more as something that requires some work to apply in various parts of the economy that there's some friction associated with.Both of these aren't inconsistent, they're just kind of different vibe shifts that are happening. So getting back to the question of is this just a normal technology, I would say that, at the very least, it does seem faster in some respects than some other technological changes that we've seen. So I think ChatGPT's adoption going from zero to double-digit percentages of use across many professions in the US and in a matter of high number of months, low number of years, is quite stark.Would you be surprised if, five years from now, we viewed AI as something much more important than just another incremental technological advance, something far more transformative than technologies that have come before?No, I wouldn't be surprised by that at all. If I understand your question correctly, my baseline expectation is that it will be seen as one of the most important technologies ever. I'm not sure that there's a standard consensus on how to rate the internet versus electricity, et cetera, but it does seem to me like it's of the same caliber of electricity in the sense of essentially converting one kind of energy into various kinds of useful economic work. Similarly, AI is converting various types of electricity into cognitive work, and I think that's a huge deal.Maximizing the benefits (7:21)There's also a lot of value being left on the table in terms of finding new ways to exploit the upsides and accelerate particularly beneficial applications.However you want to define society or the aspect of society that you focus on — government businesses, individuals — are we collectively doing what we need to do to fully exploit the upsides of this technology over the next half-decade to decade, as well as minimizing potential downsides?I think we are not, and this is something that I sometimes find frustrating about the way that the debate plays out is that there's sometimes this zero-sum mentality of doomers versus boomers — a term that Karen Hao uses — and this idea that there's this inherent tension between mitigating the risks and maximizing the benefits, and there are some tensions, but I don't think that we are on the Pareto frontier, so to speak, of those issues.Right now, I think there's a lot of value being left on the table in terms of fairly low-cost risk mitigations. There's also a lot of value being left on the table in terms of finding new ways to exploit the upsides and accelerate particularly beneficial applications. I'll give just one example, because I write a lot about the risk, but I also am very interested in maximizing the upside. So I'll just give one example: Protecting critical infrastructure and improving the cybersecurity of various parts of critical infrastructure in the US. Hospitals, for example, get attacked with ransomware all the time, and this causes real harm to patients because machines get bricked, essentially, and they have one or two people on the IT team, and they're kind of overwhelmed by these, not even always that sophisticated, but perhaps more-sophisticated hackers. That's a huge problem. It matters for national security in addition to patients' lives, and it matters for national security in the sense that this is something that China and Russia and others could hold at risk in the context of a war. They could threaten this critical infrastructure as part of a bargaining strategy.And I don't think that there's that much interest in helping hospitals have a better automated cybersecurity engineer helper among the Big Tech companies — because there aren't that many hospital administrators. . . I'm not sure if it would meet the technical definition of market failure, but it's at least a national security failure in that it's a kind of fragmented market. There's a water plant here, a hospital administrator there.I recently put out a report with the Institute for Progress arguing that philanthropists and government could put some additional gasoline in the tank of cybersecurity by incentivizing innovation that specifically helps these under-resourced defenders more so than the usual customers of cybersecurity companies like Fortune 500 companies.I'm confident that companies and entrepreneurs will figure out how to extract value from AI and create new products and new services, barring any regulatory slowdowns. But since you mentioned low-hanging fruit, what are some examples of that?I would say that transparency is one of the areas where a lot of AI policy experts seem to be in pretty strong agreement. Obviously there is still some debate and disagreement about the details of what should be required, but just to give you some illustration, it is typical for the leading AI companies, sometimes called frontier AI companies, to put out some kind of documentation about the safety steps that they've taken. It's typical for them to say, here's our safety strategy and here's some evidence that we're following this strategy. This includes things like assessing whether their systems can be used for cyber-attacks, and assessing whether they could be used to create biological weapons, or assessing the extent to which they make up facts and make mistakes, but state them very confidently in a way that could pose risks to users of the technology.That tends to be totally voluntary, and there started to be some momentum as a result of various voluntary commitments that were made in recent years, but as the technology gets more high-stakes, and there's more cutthroat competition, and there's maybe more lawsuits where companies might be tempted to retreat a bit in terms of the information that they share, I think that things could kind of backslide, and at the very least not advance as far as I would like from the perspective of making sure that there's sharing of lessons learned from one company to another, as well as making sure that investors and users of the technology can make informed decisions about, okay, do I purchase the services of OpenAI, or Google, or Anthropic, and making these informed decisions, making informed capital investment seems to require transparency to some degree.This is something that is actively being debated in a few contexts. For example, in California there's a bill that has that and a few other things called SB-53. But in general, we're at a bit of a fork in the road in terms of both how certain regulations will be implemented such as in the EU. Is it going to become actually an adaptive, nimble approach to risk mitigation or is it going to become a compliance checklist that just kind of makes big four accounting firms richer? So there are questions then there are just “does the law pass or not?” kind of questions here.Recognizing the risks (13:23). . . I'm sure there'll be some things that we look back on and say it's not ideal, but in my opinion, it's better to do something that is as informed as we can do, because it does seem like there are these kind of market failures and incentive problems that are going to arise if we do nothing . . .In my probably overly simplistic way of looking at it, I think of two buckets and you have issues like, are these things biased? Are they giving misinformation? Are they interacting with young people in a way that's bad for their mental health? And I feel like we have a lot of rules and we have a huge legal system for liability that can probably handle those.Then, in the other bucket, are what may, for the moment, be science-fictional kinds of existential risks, whether it's machines taking over or just being able to give humans the ability to do very bad things in a way we couldn't before. Within that second bucket, I think, it sort of needs to be flexible. Right now, I'm pretty happy with voluntary standards, and market discipline, and maybe the government creating some benchmarks, but I can imagine the technology advancing to where the voluntary aspect seems less viable and there might need to be actual mandates about transparency, or testing, or red teaming, or whatever you want to call it.I think that's a reasonable distinction, in the sense that there are risks at different scales, there are some that are kind of these large-scale catastrophic risks and might have lower likelihood but higher magnitude of impact. And then there are things that are, I would say, literally happening millions of times a day like ChatGPT making up citations to articles that don't exist, or Claud saying that it fixed your code but actually it didn't fix the code and the user's too lazy to notice, and so forth.So there are these different kinds of risks. I personally don't make a super strong distinction between them in terms of different time horizons, precisely because I think things are going so quickly. I think science fiction is becoming science fact very much sooner than many people expected. But in any case, I think that similar logic around, let's make sure that there's transparency even if we don't know exactly what the right risk thresholds are, and we want to allow a fair degree of flexibility and what measures companies take.It seems good that they share what they're doing and, in my opinion, ideally go another step further and allow third parties to audit their practices and make sure that if they say, “Well, we did a rigorous test for hallucination or something like that,” that that's actually true. And so that's what I would like to see for both what you might call the mundane and the more science fiction risks. But again, I think it's kind of hard to say how things will play out, and different people have different perspectives on these things. I happen to be on the more aggressive end of the spectrumI am worried about the spread of the apocalyptic, high-risk AI narrative that we heard so much about when ChatGPT first rolled out. That seems to have quieted, but I worry about it ramping up again and stifling innovation in an attempt to reduce risk.These are very fair concerns, and I will say that there are lots of bills and laws out there that have, in fact, slowed down innovation and certain contexts. The EU, I think, has gone too far in some areas around social media platforms. I do think at least some of the state bills that have been floated would lead to a lot of red tape and burdens to small businesses. I personally think this is avoidable.There are going to be mistakes. I don't want to be misleading about how high quality policymakers' understanding of some of these issues are. There will be mistakes, even in cases where, for example, in California there was a kind of blue ribbon commission of AI experts producing a report over several months, and then that directly informing legislation, and a lot of industry back and forth and negotiation over the details. I would say that's probably the high water mark, SB-53, of fairly stakeholder/expert-informed legislation. Even there, I'm sure there'll be some things that we look back on and say it's not ideal, but in my opinion, it's better to do something that is as informed as we can do, because it does seem like there are these kind of market failures and incentive problems that are going to arise if we do nothing, such as companies retrenching and holding back information that makes it hard for the field as a whole to tackle these issues.I'll just make one more point, which is adapting to the compliance capability of different companies: How rich are they? How expensive are the models they're training, I think is a key factor in the legislation that I tend to be more sympathetic to. So just to make a contrast, there's a bill in Colorado that was kind of one size fits all, regulate all the kind of algorithms, and that, I think, is very burdensome to small businesses. I think something like SB-53 where it says, okay, if you can afford to train an AI system for a $100 million, you can probably afford to put out a dozen pages about your safety and security practices.Pacing true progress (19:04). . . some people . . . kind of wanted to say, “Well, things are slowing down.” But in my opinion, if you look at more objective measures of progress . . . there's quite rapid progress happening still.Hopefully Grok did not create this tweet of yours, but if it did, well, there we go. You won't have to answer it, but I just want to understand what you meant by it: “A lot of AI safety people really, really want to find evidence that we have a lot of time for AGI.” What does that mean?What I was trying to get at is that — and I guess this is not necessarily just AI safety people, but I sometimes kind of try to poke at people in my social network who I'm often on the same side of, but also try to be a friendly critic to, and that includes people who are working on AI safety. I think there's a common tendency to kind of grasp at what I would consider straws when reading papers and interpreting product launches in a way that kind of suggests, well, we've hit a wall, AI is slowing down, this was a flop, who cares?I'm doing my kind of maybe uncharitable psychoanalysis. What I was getting at is that I think one reason why some people might be tempted to do that is that it makes things seem easier and less scary: “Well, we don't have to worry about really powerful AI enabled cyber-attacks for another five years, or biological weapons for another two years, or whatever.” Maybe, maybe not.I think the specific example that sparked that was GPT-5 where there were a lot of people who, in my opinion, were reading the tea leaves in a particular way and missing important parts of the context. For example, at GPT-5 wasn't a much larger or more expensive-to-train model than GPT-4, which may be surprising by the name. And I think OpenAI did kind of screw up the naming and gave people the wrong impression, but from my perspective, there was nothing particularly surprising, but to some people it was kind of a flop that they kind of wanted to say, “Well, things are slowing down.” But in my opinion, if you look at more objective measures of progress like scores on math, and coding, and the reduction in the rate of hallucinations, and solving chemistry and biology problems, and designing new chips, and so forth, there's quite rapid progress happening still.Considering national security (21:39)I want to avoid a scenario like the Cuban Missile Crisis or ways in which that could have been much worse than the actual Cuban Missile Crisis happening as a result of AI and AGI.I'm not sure if you're familiar with some of the work being done by former Google CEO Eric Schmidt, who's been doing a lot of work on national security and AI, and his work, it doesn't use the word AGI, but it talks about AI certainly smart enough to be able to have certain capabilities which our national security establishment should be aware of, should be planning, and those capabilities, I think to most people, would seem sort of science fictional: being able to launch incredibly sophisticated cyber-attacks, or be able to improve itself, or be able to create some other sort of capabilities. And from that, I'm like, whether or not you think that's possible, to me, the odds of that being possible are not zero, and if they're not zero, some bit of the bandwidth of the Pentagon should be thinking about that. I mean, is that sensible?Yeah, it's totally sensible. I'm not going to argue with you there. In fact, I've done some collaboration with the Rand Corporation, which has a pretty heavy investment in what they call the geopolitics of AGI and kind of studying what are the scenarios, including AI and AGI being used to produce “wonder weapons” and super-weapons of some kind.Basically, I think this is super important and in fact, I have a paper coming out that was in collaboration with some folks there pretty soon. I won't spoil all the details, but if you search “Miles Brundage US China,” you'll see some things that I've discussed there. And basically my perspective is we need to strike a balance between competing vigorously on the commercial side with countries like China and Russia on AI — more so China, Russia is less of a threat on the commercial side, at least — and also making sure that we're fielding national security applications of AI in a responsible way, but also recognizing that there are these ways in which things could spiral out of control in a scenario with totally unbridled competition. I want to avoid a scenario like the Cuban Missile Crisis or ways in which that could have been much worse than the actual Cuban Missile Crisis happening as a result of AI and AGI.If you think that, again, the odds are not zero that a technology which is fast-evolving, that we have no previous experience with because it's fast-evolving, could create the kinds of doomsday scenarios that there's new books out about, people are talking about. And so if you think, okay, not a zero percent chance that could happen, but it is kind of a zero percent chance that we're going to stop AI, smash the GPUs, as someone who cares about policy, are you just hoping for the best, or are the kinds of things we've already talked about — transparency, testing, maybe that testing becoming mandatory at some point — is that enough?It's hard to say what's enough, and I agree that . . . I don't know if I give it zero, maybe if there's some major pandemic caused by AI and then Xi Jinping and Trump get together and say, okay, this is getting out of control, maybe things could change. But yeah, it does seem like continued investment and a large-scale deployment of AI is the most likely scenario.Generally, the way that I see this playing out is that there are kind of three pillars of a solution. There's kind of some degree of safety and security standards. Maybe we won't agree on everything, but we should at least be able to agree that you don't want to lose control of your AI system, you don't want it to get stolen, you don't want a $10 billion AI system to be stolen by a $10 million-scale hacking effort. So I think there are sensible standards you can come up with around safety and security. I think you can have evidence produced or required that companies are following these things. That includes transparency.It also includes, I would say, third-party auditing where there's kind of third parties checking the claims and making sure that these standards are being followed, and then you need some incentives to actually participate in this regime and follow it. And I think the incentives part is tricky, particularly at an international scale. What incentive does China have to play ball other than obviously they don't want to have their AI kill them or overthrow their government or whatever? So where exactly are the interests aligned or not? Is there some kind of system of export control policies or sanctions or something that would drive compliance or is there some other approach? I think that's the tricky part, but to me, those are kind of the rough outlines of a solution. Maybe that's enough, but I think right now it's not even really clear what the rough rules of the road are, who's playing by the rules, and we're relying a lot on goodwill and voluntary reporting. I think we could do better, but is that enough? That's harder to say.Grounds for optimism and pessimism (27:15). . . it seems to me like there is at least some room for learning from experience . . . So in that sense, I'm more optimistic. . . I would say, in another respect, I'm maybe more pessimistic in that I am seeing value being left on the table.Did your experience at OpenAI make you more or make you more optimistic or worried that, when we look back 10 years from now, that AI will have, overall on net, made the world a better place?I am sorry to not give you a simpler answer here, and maybe think I should sit on this one and come up with a kind of clearer, more optimistic or more pessimistic answer, but I'll give you kind of two updates in different directions, and I think they're not totally inconsistent.I would say that I have gotten more optimistic about the solvability of the problem in the following sense. I think that things were very fuzzy five, 10 years ago, and when I joined OpenAI almost seven years now ago now, there was a lot of concern that it could kind of come about suddenly — that one day you don't have AI, the next day you have AGI, and then on the third day you have artificial superintelligence and so forth.But we don't live to see the fourth day.Exactly, and so it seems more gradual to me now, and I think that is a good thing. It also means that — and this is where I differ from some of the more extreme voices in terms of shutting it all down — it seems to me like there is at least some room for learning from experience, iterating, kind of taking the lessons from GPT-5 and translating them into GPT-6, rather than it being something that we have to get 100 percent right on the first shot and there being no room for error. So in that sense, I'm more optimistic.I would say, in another respect, I'm maybe more pessimistic in that I am seeing value being left on the table. It seems to me like, as I said, we're not on the Pareto frontier. It seems like there are pretty straightforward things that could be done for a very small fraction of, say, the US federal budget, or very small fraction of billionaires' personal philanthropy or whatever. That in my opinion, would dramatically reduce the likelihood of an AI-enabled pandemic or various other issues, and would dramatically increase the benefits of AI.It's been a bit sad to continuously see those opportunities being neglected. I hope that as AI becomes more of a salient issue to more people and people start to appreciate, okay, this is a real thing, the benefits are real, the risks are real, that there will be more of a kind of efficient policy market and people take those opportunities, but right now it seems pretty inefficient to me. That's where my pessimism comes from. It's not that it's unsolvable, it's just, okay, from a political economy and kind of public-choice perspective, are the policymakers going to make the right decisions?On sale everywhere The Conservative Futurist: How To Create the Sci-Fi World We Were PromisedMicro Reads Faster, Please! is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit fasterplease.substack.com/subscribe

Summary In this episode, Clayton Cuteri explores the concept of momentum in personal growth and spirituality, drawing on teachings from Jesus and the Pareto principle. He emphasizes the importance of focusing on positive thoughts and actions to create momentum in life and how this can lead to significant transformations. The conversation also touches on the interconnectedness of individuals in their spiritual journeys and the importance of supporting one another.Clayton's Social MediaLinkTree | TikTok | Instagram | Twitter (X) | YouTube | RumbleTimecodes00:00 - Intro01:04 - The Power of Momentum in Life03:51 - Understanding the Pareto Principle06:04 - Creating Positive Momentum12:00 - Transforming Your Life Through Focus15:40 - Supporting Each Other's Spiritual JourneysIntro/Outro Music Producer: Don KinIG: https://www.instagram.com/donkinmusic/Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/artist/44QKqKsd81oJEBKffwdFfPSuper grateful for this guy ^Send Clayton a text message!Support the showNEWSLETTER - SIGN UP HERE

What would you do if your company had just 90 days to survive? That's the reality turnaround expert Bill Canady has faced more than once. In this episode of the Business Leader Podcast, we speak with him to unpack the three drivers of business transformation: growth, fear and exit. Canady shows how focusing on profitability first, leveraging the Pareto 80/20 principle and taking tough but necessary decisions can set a business back on course.From restructuring teams to repricing products, his insights cut through complexity with actionable advice. Whether you're battling cash flow problems, stalled growth or preparing for a strategic exit, this conversation will help you reframe your challenges as opportunities. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this episode of The Conference Room, host Simon is joined by serial entrepreneur  Kasim Aslam.  Kasim shares his inspiring journey from humble beginnings in Albuquerque to building multiple seven and eight-figure businesses, including the top-ranked Google ad agency Solutions 8, which he sold in 2022. He discusses his entrepreneurial origin story, the challenges he faced, and how he cracked the code on hiring exceptional talent globally.  Kasim introduces his upcoming book Higher, a step-by-step framework for hiring top remote talent, and dives deep into why most businesses struggle to attract extraordinary employees and how to fix that. He also shares practical hiring strategies, including how to find, vet, and retain the best people worldwide, especially in emerging markets. This episode is a must-listen for entrepreneurs and business leaders looking to scale with high-impact talent.Key Moments:Introduction to  Kasim Aslam: Serial entrepreneur, author, and founder of Solutions 8, with multiple successful exitsCassim's entrepreneurial origin story: Growing up in poverty, early business lessons selling candy, and the impact of his upbringing.Overcoming adversity: From losing everything in the banking collapse to starting over with web work and building Solutions 8.Building and selling Solutions 8: Growing the largest dedicated Google ad agency and lessons learned from the exit.Post-exit ventures and passion for offshore staffing: How  Kasim builds multiple service businesses and his focus on empowering talent in emerging markets.The Higher book and hiring philosophy: Why treating people as commodities is wrong and the power of the Pareto (80/20) distribution in talent.Why most businesses repel top talent: Fear of competence, mediocrity, and the importance of paying more to attract exceptional employees.Global talent arbitrage: How hiring internationally can provide access to highly skilled, motivated workers at competitive rates.Practical hiring framework: Writing compelling job posts, using “fly traps” to filter candidates, paying for trial projects, and testing real job skills.Final tips and book launch: Top three hiring tips—be a place people want to work, have high expectations, and trust your team. How to get the Higher book and connect with Cassim.To learn more about  Kasim Aslam please visit her Linkedin ProfileTo learn more about  Pareto Talent please visit her websiteYOUR HOST - SIMON LADER    Simon Lader is the host of The Conference Room, Co-Founder of global executive search firm Salisi Human Capital, and lead generation consultancy Flow and Scale. Since 1997, Simon has helped cybersecurity vendors to build highly effective teams, and since 2022 he has helped people create consistent revenue through consistent lead generation.      Get to know more about Simon at:    Website: https://simonlader.com/  Twitter: https://twitter.com/simonlader  LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/headhuntersimonlader/    The Conference Room is available onSpotifyApple podcastsAmazon MusicIHeartRadio

In dieser Folge gibt es spannende Neuigkeiten aus Sörens Welt: Sein neues Fahrrad ist endlich angekommen! Außerdem reden wir über Sport im Allgemeinen – warum er uns antreibt, wo er uns an Grenzen bringt und wie wir Motivation finden. Ein besonderes Highlight ist der Rückblick auf den beeindruckenden Erfolg von Kim Gottwald, der beim „Last Man Standing“-Lauf unglaubliche 282 Kilometer geschafft hat.Locker, persönlich und mit einer Portion Humor – wie immer bei Konsens 2 Go.

The Pareto principle states that for many outcomes, roughly 80% of consequences come from 20% of causes. In other words, a small percentage of causes have an outsized effect. This concept is important to understand because it can help you identify which initiatives to prioritize so you can make the most impact.

I det senaste avsnittet av Börsmäklarna slår sig programledare Pavas Mehra ner med analytikerna Filip Wiberg och Dan Akschuti dagen efter Pareto Securities 16:e Healthcare Conference i Stockholm. Tillsammans går de igenom de viktigaste insikterna från konferensen och sektorn. Från turbulensen på FDA till Kinas snabba framväxt inom medicinsk forskning. Dessutom blickar de framåt mot vilka trender investerare bör ha extra koll på framåt.Pareto Securities är ett oberoende mäklarhus med en ledande position på den nordiska kapitalmarknaden. Vi har en stark internationell närvaro och global placing power. Vårt mål är att vara Nordens föredragna leverantör av finansiella tjänster, genom att erbjuda solida finansieringslösningar och attraktiva investeringsmöjligheter för företag och investerare. Läs mer: ⁠https://www.paretosec.se/om-oss/om-pareto-securities/om-pareto-securities⁠  Disclaimer: Pareto Securities' podcasts innehåller inga professionella råd och ska inte betraktas som investeringsrådgivning. Handel med värdepapper innebär alltid en risk och historisk avkastning är ingen garanti för framtida avkastning. Pareto Securities är varken juridiskt eller ekonomiskt ansvarigt för direkta eller indirekta förluster, eller andra kostnader som kan uppstå genom att använda informationen i denna podcast.

Dr. Shannon Flumerfelt, Founder of Charactership Lean Consulting and Endowed Professor of Lean at Oakland University, joined host Jamie Flinchbaugh to discuss her systematic approach to coaching leaders through difficult situations and complex problem-solving challenges. Dr. Flumerfelt shared her framework for handling difficult coaching situations, which begins with understanding whether the challenge stems from external factors or internal issues. She explains that external problems—such as skill gaps or training needs—are often easier to address through coaching and mentoring. However, internal challenges require a deeper analysis using what she calls the "head, heart, and hands" approach: examining a person's knowledge, disposition, and actual capabilities. When faced with complex situations, Dr. Flumerfelt advocates for creating an Ishikawa diagram to break down all contributing factors. She emphasizes the power of co-creating these visual tools with clients, noting that self-reflection becomes most powerful when people can see their challenges mapped out concretely. This approach helps remove emotional drama from the situation and enables more logical, analytical thinking while still respecting people's feelings and perspectives. Regarding prioritization when multiple problems exist, she stresses that the approach must be organic and context-dependent, true to lean principles. She suggests several methods for determining where to start: ensuring strategic alignment with organizational goals through Hoshin Kanri planning, conducting quality function deployment analysis to understand customer requirements, or using Pareto analysis to tackle the most significant causes first. However, she cautions that sometimes the biggest problems are beyond an individual's scope of influence, requiring a more realistic assessment of what can be accomplished. Dr. Flumerfelt also recommends using interrelationship diagrams to identify which issues have the most connections to other problems, as addressing these can create the greatest ripple effect of positive change. The key is understanding your level of power, influence, and authority within the organization and working within those realistic boundaries. When discussing how to tap into people's intuition alongside analytical tools, she acknowledges that lean thinking often appears heavily engineering-focused and black-and-white. However, she emphasizes that successful lean implementation requires understanding the complete framework of lean thinking, not just selecting individual tools. She advocates for using personality assessments like Myers-Briggs to understand team members' strengths and whether they tend toward intuitive or logical approaches. She highlights the concept of social capital as a competitive advantage, referencing Michael Porter's work. She believes organizations drastically underutilize their human potential, comparing it to how individuals only use a small percentage of their brain capacity. When you multiply underutilized brains across an entire organization, the untapped potential becomes enormous. This perspective drives her approach to individualizing and customizing development for each person, recognizing that people aren't robots and have unique strengths and weaknesses that deserve respect. Throughout the conversation, the importance of visual management tools and moving beyond just thinking or journaling to drawing out and visualizing problems and solutions was emphasized. This structured approach helps transform messy, complex situations into manageable challenges that can be systematically addressed. For those interested in experiencing her approach firsthand, Dr. Flumerfelt offers consulting services through Charactership Lean Consulting and teaches in Oakland University's graduate Lean Leadership program—a rare opportunity in higher education. To learn more about Dr. Flumerfelt's work, visit charactershiplean.org or connect with her on LinkedIn

President Donald Trump has been using the phrase “common sense” a lot. But it turns out that this is nothing new for politicians. This hour, we look at how common sense is used in politics. Plus, is there really such a thing as common sense? We dig into what it means and if it’s possible to teach it to artificial intelligence. GUESTS: Sophia Rosenfeld: Walter H. Annenberg Professor of History and Chair of the Department of History at the University of Pennsylvania; she is the author of multiple books, including Common Sense: A Political History and her new book, The Age of Choice: A History of Freedom in Modern Life Mark Whiting: Research fellow at the Computational Social Science lab at the University of Pennsylvania and chief technology officer of the startup Pareto.AI; you can find the common sense survey here Mayank Kejriwal: Research professor and principal scientist at the University of Southern California The Colin McEnroe Show is available as a podcast on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Amazon Music, TuneIn, Listen Notes, or wherever you get your podcasts. Subscribe and never miss an episode! Subscribe to The Noseletter, an email compendium of merriment, secrets, and ancient wisdom brought to you by The Colin McEnroe Show. Join the conversation on Facebook and Twitter. Colin McEnroe, Angelica Gajewski, and Dylan Reyes contributed to this show, which originally aired on March 6, 2025.Support the show: http://www.wnpr.org/donateSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Send us a textJoin us as Mark Goldhart and Trevor Crump explore the critical importance of creative velocity and diversity in digital advertising. They dive into how uploading varied content more frequently can lead to lower CPMs and better overall ad performance. The duo shares insights on leveraging user-generated content, the value of static ads, and why aiming for "lightning in a bottle" isn't a sustainable strategy. They also touch on the Pareto principle in advertising and draw parallels with sports to illustrate the need for consistent, predictable outcomes in marketing.Follow  ⁨@unstoppablemarketerpodcast⁩ on instagram and youtube for daily marketing insights and direct feedback.

Idag sänder Börslunch live från Pareto Healthcare Conference! Vi får ta del av de senaste spaningarna från konferensen och bjuds på spännande aktiecase inom hälsovårdssektorn. Dagens gäster är Astrid Samuelsson, förvaltare på Healthinvest och Filip Wiberg, analytiker på Pareto. Programmet leds av Jesper Norberg och Gabriel Mellqvist.

La comunidad del Club de Lectura ya es una realidad, creamos un CANAL en Whatsapp para todos los amantes de los libros

¿Se puede preparar oposiciones a bombero en Vizcaya en solo 8 meses viniendo de otra oposición? En este episodio del podcast de Formación Ninja, David Fuentes conversa con Julen, un opositor que tras ser interino en policía ha decidido perseguir su verdadera vocación: ser bombero. Una entrevista llena de aprendizajes prácticos sobre cómo organizar el temario, mantener la motivación y preparar una oposición de forma realista cuando el tiempo apremia.¿Quieres prepararte con nosotros?https://formacion.ninja/?utm_source=podcastNuestro Canal de WhatsApp:https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VaDKoSOCcW4tN3Cuh10QSi te ha gustado el vídeo, dale 5 estrellas

Every attempt at a utopia seems to run into the problem of fundamental inequality. Christ suggests a self-interested way to serve others that solves the problem for the individual.

On this episode of Next Level CRE, Matt Faircloth interviews Paul Moore. Paul shares his remarkable journey from selling his first company and chasing “shiny objects” that left him $2.5M in debt, to giving his way out during the 2008 crash, and eventually pivoting into real estate. He explains why multifamily wasn't the “perfect investment,” how Wellings Capital now focuses on fund-of-funds strategies using Pareto's principle to back only top-tier operators, and why diversification across operators, geographies, and asset classes is key. Paul also highlights how private equity firms vet operators, what passives should know about due diligence (including NOI audits), and how Wellings has raised over $800K to fight human trafficking through AIM Paul Moore Current role: Founder & Managing Partner, Wellings Capital Based in: Lynchburg, Virginia Say hi to them at: LinkedIn| Wellings Capital| AIM Free Get 50% Off Monarch Money, the all-in-one financial tool at www.monarchmoney.com with code BESTEVER Join the Best Ever Community  The Best Ever Community is live and growing - and we want serious commercial real estate investors like you inside. It's free to join, but you must apply and meet the criteria.  Connect with top operators, LPs, GPs, and more, get real insights, and be part of a curated network built to help you grow. Apply now at ⁠www.bestevercommunity.com⁠ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Jeroen Leenders Experience Live 14 Augustus 2025, Fort 4, Mortsel. Word lid op YouTube en kijk de video. Log in met jouw persoonlijke YouTube-account vanop een laptop of PC en volg deze link: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCl7CNw3jWIMP_Ctk-7n13Sw/join Tickets voor de volgende live- show in Antwerpen https://www.jeroenleenders.be #JeroenLeendersExperience #standup #standupcomedy #comedy #antwerpen #comedytrain (0:00) Promo (0:46) Thee in Retie (5:51) Ramen en Deuren in een Hittegolf (7:06) Handgeschakeld (9:09) Team Burgemeester Zemst (Nikki S) (9:39) Veritas (10:31) Echte Supreme Leader (10:50) Te Kaperen varen (11:46) Onvriendelijke Vlaamse Winkels (13:30) Oude Liften (16:46) Realisten (18:22) Zand (Jentel Vaelen FBm) (19:35) Epstein (20:10) Wet van Pareto (23:28) Herverdeling Rijkdom (25:49) Vijand van mijn Vijand (RagnaMusic S) (26:35) ADHD Geschenk voor Luie Ouders (30:18) Verlies Privilege (37:14) BiB (42:20) Burn- Out (45:50) Wielrennen (51:12) Lotto winnen (57:41) Betalen voor de W.C. (58:56) Kindersurprise (1:07:26) Medicijnmannen YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCl7CNw3jWIMP_Ctk-7n13Sw/join Speellijst & info: http://www.jeroenleenders.be Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/the_jeroen_leenders_experience/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/www.jeroenleenders.be Twitter: https://twitter.com/jeroen_leenders Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/5I6B88nVw4wyxWqh331899 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCl7CNw3jWIMP_Ctk-7n13Sw/join iTunes: https://podcasts.apple.com/nl/podcast/jeroen-leenders-experience/id1370129605

In this episode of The Tech Leader's Playbook, Avetis Antaplyan sits down with Andrew McVeigh, veteran technology leader and Chief Architect, whose career spans transformations at Hulu, Riot Games, and beyond. Andrew has navigated multi-billion-dollar shifts across industries from finance to gaming and healthcare, leaving behind architectures that still power companies today.The conversation dives deep into some of the most pressing questions in modern tech leadership: What matters most—EQ, IQ, or AI? Should organizations rebuild systems from scratch or evolve incrementally? Andrew shares candid stories, including lessons from Riot Games, the pitfalls of full rewrites, and the importance of balancing optimism with realism.Listeners will gain insight into how domain expertise and generalist skills complement one another, why EQ becomes more critical than IQ at senior levels, and how AI is reshaping engineering work without eliminating the need for human craft. Andrew also reflects on personal resilience, leadership missteps (like literally flipping a table), and the value of building systems and cultures that endure. This episode offers a rare inside look into decades of architectural wisdom and leadership lessons applicable to anyone guiding teams through complexity and changeTakeawaysEQ often outweighs IQ at senior leadership levels when managing large teams.Losing emotional control may feel satisfying in the moment but erodes long-term trust and outcomes.Generalists and specialists both play vital roles—large-scale architecture requires a mix of both.Domain expertise is valuable but shouldn't be an absolute barrier to hiring strong engineers.Successful engineers learn to work at the level of intention rather than just tasks.Psychological safety fuels better performance and innovation in teams.AI augments, not replaces—engineers must learn to collaborate with it effectively.Craft and fundamentals (e.g., programming) remain essential even as AI automates repetitive work.The Pareto principle (80/20) applies broadly—focus on high-leverage outcomes, not perfection.Full rewrites often fail; incremental evolution with a defined “North Star” strategy is safer.Optimism in leadership can shift cultures and reframe challenges as opportunities.Balancing results with humanity ensures people want to work with you again.Chapters00:00 Intro: EQ, IQ, or AI?01:15 Guest Introduction: Andrew McVeigh's career at Hulu, Riot Games, and more02:30 Industry Crossovers: From finance to gaming to healthcare04:10 Specialists vs. Generalists in large-scale systems05:20 The rising importance of EQ in leadership07:10 Riot Games culture and the “must be a gamer” debate11:20 What makes great engineers stand out13:40 Leadership, personal resilience, and the humanity factor17:50 How AI reshapes engineering work22:30 Applying the Pareto principle in tech leadership24:50 The rewrite dilemma: Start over or evolve?31:20 Preserving value while modernizing legacy systems36:10 Final thoughts: EQ, IQ, or AI? Andrew's choice37:30 Book recommendations and sources of inspiration38:40 Closing advice: Attitude, optimism, and ownership39:45 Outro and how to connect with AndrewAndrew McVeigh's Social Media Links:https://www.linkedin.com/in/andrewmcveigh/Andrew McVeigh's Website:https://www.suvoda.com/Resources and Links:https://www.hireclout.comhttps://www.podcast.hireclout.comhttps://www.linkedin.com/in/hirefasthireright

Hello, welcome to the Safety Culture Excellence podcast, hosted by Shawn Galloway, CEO of ProAct Safety.    This week's podcast is about "Aiming at the Right Target." Does your Pareto analysis confirm your focus? https://proactsafety.com/solutions/consulting/transformational-pareto-analysis          I hope you enjoy the podcast.  Have a great week!    Shawn M. Galloway   Unlock the potential of engagement in your organization with Shared Ownership: Engaging the Subcultures.

Built primarily for institutional-grade clients,  Pareto delivers customizable on-chain credit markets designed to expand DeFi liquidity and TradFi tokenization through structured yield strategies tailored to diverse risk profiles. Pareto allows its users to construct individualized credit lines in specific risk-ajusted tranches, with custom: interest rates, lockup periods, withdrawal cycles, reserve ratios, etc. In addition, Pareto's USP is an yield-bearing synthetic stablecoin, fully backed by major stablecoins, that can be deployed into a diversified portfolio of liquid, short- and long-term credit, thus increasing capital efficiency.Topics covered in this episode:Matteo's backgroundIdle Finance yield optimizationPivoting to ParetoInstitutional borrowers in early DeFiCompetitive advantage of ParetoOutsourcing underwritingManaging defaultsCustomized lendingKYC requirementsTimeline terms ‘marketplace'USP, Pareto's synthetic yield-bearing dollarLegal framework & credit allocatorsUSP yield, liquidity & integrations‘Opaque' credit vs. DeFiPareto smart contracts and redeemsSuccess in on-chain credit marketsEpisode links:Matteo Pandolfi on XParetoPareto on XIdle Finance on XSponsors:Gnosis: Gnosis builds decentralized infrastructure for the Ethereum ecosystem, since 2015. This year marks the launch of Gnosis Pay— the world's first Decentralized Payment Network. Get started today at - gnosis.ioChorus One: one of the largest node operators worldwide, trusted by 175,000+ accounts across more than 60 networks, Chorus One combines institutional-grade security with the highest yields at - chorus.oneThis episode is hosted by Friederike Ernst.

Hello, welcome to the Safety Culture Excellence podcast, hosted by Shawn Galloway, CEO of ProAct Safety.    This week's podcast is about "SIF All or Nothing Thinking." Are your Pareto analysis top precautions the same between all data and SIF data? https://proactsafety.com/solutions/consulting/transformational-pareto-analysis       I hope you enjoy the podcast.  Have a great week!    Shawn M. Galloway   All of our books are available in all formats on Amazon.

It's time to toss the notion of having a “work ethic” into the dustbin of the 20th century. It misled generations to devote their lives to their jobs, and everything else — family, dreams, the fun stuff — had to scramble for scraps. The better option is to embrace what Mark Reinisch calls a “wellness ethic” — working hard for your well-being. Mark shares his simplified, actionable approach in his new book, The Wellness Ethic. I would be happy to send you a complimentary copy of The Wellness Ethic in consideration of promoting it on your blog or other social media sites. Please refer to the press release below for additional information. FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE A Simplified Approach to Wellness Using the 80/20 Rule: New Book Shares Game-Changing Method for Thriving in Life CHARLESTON, SC, June 16, 2025 — Like a lot of folks, Mark Reinisch had oodles of conviction at the dawn of each new year when he announced the resolutions that were supposed to fix his life. And just like a lot of folks, his best-laid plans fizzled as soon as life interfered. Then, in 2018, he had an epiphany: write a book to unlock the secrets to wellness and the meaning of life. “My breakthrough idea was to write a book about wellness and apply the wisdom to my own life to become happier and more fulfilled,” said Reinisch, a life coach, humorist and former corporate executive. “If I could learn how to eclipse the blinding daylight between inspired living and my actual existence, I knew I could help others do the same.” His new book, The Wellness Ethnic, is NOT a typical self-help book. Reinisch isn't a Harvard-educated psychologist or a multi-millionaire living a charmed life. Reinisch is relatable, vulnerable and hilarious as he simplifies complex wellness topics like mind, body, spirit and relationships to make wellness accessible, actionable and engaging. So, what is a “wellness ethic”? “It means you're committed to wellness because you know that it improves your life and makes the world better,” Reinisch explained, adding, “When you have a wellness ethic, you thrive no matter how unpredictable the world gets.” What makes Reinisch's approach stand out from the legions of other self-help books is his remarkably simple approach: the 80/20 rule, also known as the Pareto principle, derived from the work of Italian economist Vilfredo Pareto. It states that approximately 80% of the results (outcomes) are driven by 20% of the actions (inputs). “When you apply the 80/20 rule to your life, it can be a game changer,” Reinisch said. “For example, the 80/20 rule suggests that 80% of the benefits of spirituality can be attained by embracing the most vital 20% of spiritual practices. Similarly, 80% of the benefits of taking care of your body can be realized by simply adopting the most vital 20% of physical wellness practices. It's the key to making wellness attainable and sustainable.” Written to be the antidote to self-help books that are “too damn boring,” The Wellness Ethic is a compelling, fun-to-read book with humor and personal stories that make the wellness concepts spring to life. “It is the rare self-help book that you won't be able to put down, unless the sheer bulk of it tires your arms and you drop it,” Reinisch quipped. The Wellness Ethic: How to Thrive in an Unpredictable World (Where Stupid Things Can Happen) Release Date: February 15, 2025 ISBN-13: 979-8-9916049-1-8 (hardcover) ISBN-13: 979-8-9916049-0-1 (softcover) ISBN-13: 979-8-9916049-2-5 (eBook)

In this powerful solo episode, Chris Craddock breaks down how real estate professionals can achieve more by doing less. Drawing from Pareto's Principle—also known as the 80/20 Rule—Chris explains how focusing on your highest-value activities can lead to increased income and a more balanced, stress-free life. If you're feeling overwhelmed or stuck in your business, this episode is your blueprint for working smarter—not harder.What You'll Learn:What the 80/20 Rule really means in a real estate contextWhy most agents are busy but not productive—and how to break out of the trapHow to identify your highest-dollar-producing activitiesChris's favorite delegation strategies and toolsTime-blocking tips that can double your outputHow to shift from “reactive” to “proactive” business buildingA mindset shift that reduces stress and increases profitabilityResources Mentioned:The book The ONE Thing by Gary Keller & Jay PapasanThe Eisenhower Matrix (for task prioritization)Virtual Assistant services (Chris mentions how he uses them for delegation)Connect with Chris:

In this episode, Jared Quincy Davis, founder and CEO at Foundry, introduces the concept of "compound AI systems," which allows users to create powerful, efficient applications by composing multiple, often diverse, AI models and services. We discuss how these "networks of networks" can push the Pareto frontier, delivering results that are simultaneously faster, more accurate, and even cheaper than single-model approaches. Using examples like "laconic decoding," Jared explains the practical techniques for building these systems and the underlying principles of inference-time scaling. The conversation also delves into the critical role of co-design, where the evolution of AI algorithms and the underlying cloud infrastructure are deeply intertwined, shaping the future of agentic AI and the compute landscape. The complete show notes for this episode can be found at https://twimlai.com/go/740.

Learn the essential quality tools every manufacturer needs, including control charts, Pareto analysis, and root cause methods. Discover how to distinguish between normal and special cause variation.

Nate Littlewood, fractional CFO and mentor, is on today's episode to shed some light on the 3 most common financial challenges that affects most e-commerce entrepreneurs and talks about how to fix them. He talks about the ways you can optimize inventory, cash flow, and reduce overhead costs.  Get mystery shopped for your brand and 2 competitors of your choice FOR FREE! Stord will provide a detailed report that outlines the specific areas you are out performing your competitors and where your competitors are outperforming you. Learn how your consumers truly experience your brand today! Cash flow is king when it comes to e-commerce businesses.  More often than not business owners need to use debt to order more inventory, while keeping the price the same.  Does that really make sense if all your profit ends up going to your SBA loan leaving you with nothing?  It doesn't.  That's why in today's episode we have Nate Littlewood on the podcast. He's a fractional CFO with a background in finance, and he helps e-commerce entrepreneurs figure out how they can improve their finance literacy. He's on the podcast today to talk about the 3 ways e-commerce businesses can improve their profit margins so they  can start feeling their bank accounts grow.    The Big Takeaways Many entrepreneurs have most of their cash flow tied up in inventory, making business cash flow a huge struggle.  Fixing inventory can be an easy way to gain back some cash flow which makes your business more nimble and adaptable. Every now and then, you should assume that your SaaS budget is zero and make a case for why certain tools need to be purchased again. The 80-20 rule or The Pareto principle should help you with deciding which products to axe and which to keep. Offering more product variations does not lead to linear increased sales. Having low cash flow stops your business from growing faster than it could. Investing in supply chain optimization can also free up cash flow for your business. Timestamps 00:00 - Introduction to Financial Challenges in E-commerce 03:02 - Understanding Inventory Management and Cash Flow 18:48 - Optimizing Indirect and Overhead Costs 25:02 - Negotiating Discounts and Customer Retention 26:29 - Identifying Overspending in SaaS and Marketing 28:23 - The Importance of Inventory Management 30:40 - The Unsexy Side of Business Operations 32:00 - Applying the Pareto Principle to Product Portfolios 39:00 - The Dangers of Overcomplicating Product Offerings 41:03 - Focusing on Strengths and Delegating Tasks 44:28 - Helping Founders Achieve Financial Clarity Guest Resources Nate Littlewood's Website Nate's Free Cash Flow Improvement Course Nate LinkedIn Page As always, if you have any questions or anything that you need help with, leave a comment down below if you're interested. Don't forget to leave us a review on iTunes if you enjoy our content. Thanks for listening! Until next time, happy selling!

Do you ever feel like there's just too much to do and not enough time? Let's chat about the 80-20 rule, also known as the Pareto principle, and how it can actually become your secret weapon in conquering life's endless to-do lists. You may have heard about the 80-20 rule in a business setting—like how 80% of your revenue might come from 20% of your customers. However, did you know that it can also significantly impact how you manage your daily tasks? By identifying the 20% of tasks that bring you 80% of the results, you can finally take control and declutter your life. Here's a sad twist: while the principle itself is golden, it's often misused. Think of the exaggerations like claiming 80% of life happens to only 20% of people! Ridiculous, right? The truth is, the rule can't be boxed into rigid statistics, but it serves as a useful mental model for prioritizing what truly matters. What's important is figuring out what tasks are your mission-critical ones each day. As you pare down the non-essential, focus intensifies and progress follows. Even big names like Elon Musk swear by this approach. While it might not provide a magical one-size-fits-all solution, applying the 80-20 rule could very well be the life hack you've been searching for. For more information of LB&B, check out the links below, and if you found this useful, consider buying me a coffee below.       Life Passion & Business Podcast is about finding answers to life's big questions through weekly interviews with guest speakers. The Shortcast is my ongoing commitment to staying inquisitive and passionate about life, with whatever is alive for me each week. Follow the links below to discover what else is on offer.     The Five Questions eBook: https://lifepassionandbusiness.com/the-five-questions Focus Coaching: https://lifepassionandbusiness.com/focus-coaching/ Support The Podcast:https://www.buymeacoffee.com/lifeandpassion Midlife Survey: https://lifepassionandbusiness.com/midlife-challenge/                                    

Dream of raising a "Renaissance man or woman" who can do almost anything? Dr. Roger Smith from Parenting Matters Now shares a crucial skill: mastering the to-do list. Discover how applying the Pareto principle (the 80/20 rule) to prioritize tasks can boost productivity for both you and your children, helping them develop essential life skills and focus on what truly matters. Visit me at: https://rogersmithmd.com/ This has been a production of ThePodcastUpload.com 

Conversamos con Milly Cabán, ingeniera y coach, quien presenta su nuevo libro, De Sueños a Proyectos: Cómo Construir la Mejor Versión de Ti. Exploramos cómo aplicar conceptos de la ingeniería en la vida diaria para transformar ideas en acciones concretas. Millie comparte su enfoque en la cultura organizacional y el clima de trabajo, resaltando la metodología de Kaizen para implementar mejoras sostenibles. Durante la charla, destacamos la importancia de la disciplina y herramientas prácticas, como la metodología DMAIC, para facilitar cambios significativos. Milly enfatiza el principio de Pareto y cómo decisiones intencionales en hábitos diarios pueden impactar nuestros objetivos. El episodio se adentra en la integración de la vida profesional y personal, motivando a los oyentes a construir relaciones significativas que trasciendan los logros profesionales.

¿Sabías que el 80% de tus resultados vienen solo del 20% de tus acciones?La mayoría de los emprendedores pasa el día ocupado… pero no productivo.En este video te explico cómo aplicar la Ley de Pareto (20/80) para transformar tu negocio y multiplicar tus ingresos sin desgastarte.

La fuente principal es una publicación de blog de Borja Girón, titulada "Las 9 leyes de la Productividad", escrita en abril de 2025. Este artículo explica diversas leyes y principios que impactan la eficiencia personal y profesional, ofreciendo consejos prácticos para optimizar el tiempo y los resultados. Entre los conceptos abordados se encuentran la Ley de Pareto (enfoque en el 20% de acciones que generan el 80% de resultados) y la Ley de Párkinson (la tarea se expande al tiempo disponible), además de la Ley de Murphy y la Ley de Illich, que subraya la necesidad de descanso. También se menciona la Ley de Fraisse sobre la relatividad del tiempo y la Ley de Carlson que sugiere agrupar tareas similares para aumentar la productividad. Finalmente, se exploran la Ley de Hofstadter, que advierte que las tareas siempre toman más tiempo de lo esperado, y la Ley de Laborit, que aconseja abordar primero las tareas difíciles. El contenido tiene como objetivo ayudar a los emprendedores a ser más productivos. Artículo completo: https://borjagiron.com/leyes-productividad/ Únete a la Newsletter de Marketing Radical: https://borjagiron.com/newsletterConviértete en un seguidor de este podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/productividad-maxima--5279700/support.

In today's age of authoritarian plutocracy, the UCLA political theorist Natasha Piano argues that we need to rethink the supposed “elitist” school of Italian thinkers like Vilfredo Pareto and Gaetano Mosca. In her intriguing new book, Democratic Elitism, Piano suggests Pareto, Mosca and even the Marxist Antonio Gramsci were actually "democratic theorists of elitism" who warned that electoral institutions can often enhance elite domination. Piano contends that American political science created a "founding myth" by misrepresenting these Italian thinkers to legitimize electoral democracy during the Cold War. And in our current political climate she says, their warnings about plutocracy are particularly prescient. Five takeaways1. Flipped Interpretation of Italian Elite TheoristsPareto, Mosca, and Gramsci weren't "elite theorists of democracy" but rather "democratic theorists of elitism" - they studied elite power to expose its dangers, not endorse it.KEY QUOTE: "They investigated elitism not to endorse it, but to study it and figure out how democracy could actually create genuine accountable leaders."2. Elections ≠ DemocracyEquating democracy with competitive elections creates two major threats: it conceals plutocratic domination (rule by the wealthy) and enables demagogic manipulation by those claiming to represent "the people."KEY QUOTE: "Elections are actually representative mechanisms, they're not democratic mechanisms."3. American Political Science's "Founding Myth"The discipline misrepresented these Italian thinkers during the Cold War to legitimize electoral democracy as superior to communist alternatives, covering up their warnings about plutocracy.KEY QUOTE: "My book kind of tries to understand why we lost the extent to which plutocracy can undermine electoral institutions, as the Italians warned, and why American political science kind of covered this study of plutocracy up."4. Democracy as "Good Government"Piano advocates redefining democracy not as elections but as good government with three attributes: popular support, actively anti-plutocratic measures, and genuine pluralistic competition with majoritarian pressure from below.KEY QUOTE: "What I've understood or what I think we should take from them is that perhaps a redefinition of democracy, not as election, but as good government is in order."5. Elite Self-Recognition is EssentialContemporary "coastal elites" must acknowledge their own elite status and impose limits on their power - the solution requires elites to honestly assess their role, not blame "the mob" for democratic failures.KEY QUOTE: "They would really encourage all elites on the left or right to look within themselves and ask themselves if they're genuine aristocrats and what that would mean vis-a-vis the resurrecting the polity."Keen On America is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit keenon.substack.com/subscribe

Send us a textYou just closed a big deal. The Zoom call ends… and 20 minutes later, you're serving lasagna to your kids.No, it's not magic. It's not luck either. It's strategy.Let's be honest, corporate leadership as a woman often means wearing all the hats. The professional. The mum. The partner. The go-to problem solver.Want more time and less stress? Download my Work-Life Balance Guide (including the More Time Prioritisation Matrix)If you're ready to stop doing it all alone and become the confident, strategic leader you know you're meant to be, join the 3SIXTY Leaders Club waitlist.Podcast Details: In this episode of the 360 LeadHERship Podcast, I am pulling back the curtain on the exact five-step system she uses to run a thriving business with 60+ high-level clients, maintain executive-level leadership, and still be home with her kids for dinner without burning out.If you've ever said, “I don't have time,” this episode will show you how to create it.Tune in to Discover:Why results-focused thinking is the #1 mindset shift you need to make nowHow to finally let go of perfectionism with Lucy's 80% delegation frameworkThe power of Pareto's Principle for increasing impact while doing lessWhy strategic self-investment in mindset, nutrition, fitness, and self-care is non-negotiableHow to leverage AI and automation to save time, scale faster, and stay saneRecommended Next Steps

Send us a textTransaction costs are the friction in the gears of society, but the worst transaction costs are the ones that reflect government failure. You can see it in ever cliche about government, from the dreaded DMV lines to the passport control bottleneck. Drawing on Milton Friedman's "Barking Cats" essay from 1973, I explore why bureaucracy remains fundamentally immune to reform efforts, regardless of which political party holds power.The frustrating reality is that bureaucracies operate with completely different incentives than private businesses. While companies balance money costs against convenience to attract customers, government agencies focus solely on their budgets while taxing citizens with enormous "trouble costs." North Carolina's DMV perfectly illustrates this dysfunction—appointments require six-month waits while the state proudly touts its budget savings. Most maddening is that these aren't even genuine services, but rather artificial permission requirements the government imposes before allowing us to live our lives.This represents a textbook government failure—what economists call a Pareto inferior outcome. Most citizens would gladly pay slightly more in fees or taxes to avoid wasting hours (or months) of their lives in bureaucratic purgatory. That additional revenue could easily fund more staff and faster service. Yet the system has no mechanism to capture these preferences or respond to them.The problem isn't partisan, and it can't be fixed by shuffling leadership or staff. As Chris Rock might say about bureaucracy—"that tiger ain't go crazy, that tiger went tiger." Bureaucracy simply acts according to its nature. Reformers who believe they can fundamentally change how these institutions function are like people who want cats that bark—they fundamentally misunderstand the beast they're dealing with.Listen in for insights on why bureaucratic inefficiency persists despite our best efforts, complete with revealing (but not really funny) quotes from political thinkers ranging from Schumpeter to Trotsky. Have your own bureaucratic horror story to share? Let me know in the comments or on social media.Links:Friedman article 1973Keech and Munger article 2015Chris Rock, "Tiger!"Parkinson's LawMichael Munger: The "Trouble Tax"If you have questions or comments, or want to suggest a future topic, email the show at taitc.email@gmail.com ! You can follow Mike Munger on Twitter at @mungowitz

Aprende cómo el unitasking supera al multitasking, elimina distracciones y lleva tu productividad y enfoque diario al siguiente nivel. -Introducción: ¿y si el problema de la procrastinación no es tu voluntad, sino cómo organizas tu entorno y tus hábitos? (00:00:00) -La magia de hacer las cosas en el momento correcto y enfocados (00:05:12) -Venciendo el enemigo #1: Elimina la procrastinación con el Unitasking (00:05:58) -¿Qué es el unitasking y por qué va más allá del “no multitasking"? (00:08:19) -Multitasking, distracción, y la diferencia fundamental con el enfoque verdadero (00:09:26) -El estado de flow: cómo el unitasking multiplica tu productividad y creatividad (00:10:42) -¿Qué resultados tienen los bloques de flow? Menos horas, más impacto. (00:17:23) -El trabajo de calidad y cómo cambia el resultado de tu semana (00:18:00) -De lo simple a lo extraordinario: rutina diaria de avanzar una tarea a la vez (00:19:45) -Cuadrantes de la procrastinación: análisis rápido para desarmar excusas (00:20:48) -Herramientas prácticas para combatir la procrastinación: hazlo más fácil y disfrutable (00:23:39) -La ciencia detrás del foco en la ejecución diaria (00:24:15) -Economía de la atención: por qué la industria quiere robarte el foco (00:28:37) -Pausas intencionales vs. distracción tóxica: qué hacer cuando tu cerebro necesita un break (00:33:15) -Multiplicadores que facilitan (¡y hacen divertido!) ser productivo (00:36:40) -Aprendizaje eficiente: los 3 caminos y cómo elegir el que realmente te suma (00:37:28) -Objetivos de aprendizaje y el principio de Pareto en tu desarrollo personal (00:40:26) -Multiplicadores de resultados y hábitos: cuándo sientes que “haces trampa” por ser más efectivo (00:47:48) -La importancia de objetivos claros para aprender y avanzar rápido (00:52:10) -Súper Pregunta de la comunidad: ¿qué hacer cuando no puedes deshacerte de tus libros? (00:52:20) -Cierre del episodio. (00:56:04)  

Rediffusion d'un des épisodes les plus écoutés du Podcast du Marketing.Ne travailler que quatre heures par semaine et apprendre à consacrer du temps aux choses importantes de votre vie.Ca semble impossible.  Et bien selon Tim Ferriss, ce n'est pas un rêve. Il existe une recette que tout le monde peut suivre - y compris vous - pour y parvenir. Il en a fait un livre : la semaine de quatre heures, que je vous résume dans cet épisode. Vous y apprendrez :comment créer votre liberté même si vous êtes salariécomment utiliser les principes de Pareto et de Parkinson à votre avantage et comment créer un flux de revenus passif>> Recevoir le livre "La Semaine de 4 Heures"Autre livre résumé sur le Podcast du Marketing :Commencer par le pourquoi de Simon Sinek---------------

Pareto's Principle might sound like dry economic theory, but it's actually one of the most powerful tools cleaning business owners can harness to transform their operations and profitability. In this eye-opening conversation, we dive deep into how the 80-20 rule (first observed by Italian economist Vilfredo Pareto in 1896) applies specifically to cleaning businesses today.Ever wonder why some cleaning companies struggle while others thrive with seemingly less effort? The answer often lies in recognizing that 80% of your results come from just 20% of your inputs. We unpacks how this manifests across every aspect of your business—from discovering which clients truly drive your revenue to identifying which marketing channels actually deliver customers.The most fascinating (and perhaps uncomfortable) revelation? Your legacy clients—those who've been with you since day one—might actually be your most expensive relationships to maintain. We challenge the emotional attachments that keep you tied to underperforming accounts with a simple thought experiment: "If you broke your leg tomorrow, would these clients continue paying you while you recover?" The answer reveals the true nature of these business relationships.Beyond client management, we explore practical applications of the principle to marketing, time management, service offerings, and team building. You'll learn why specialized add-on services (like $35 sheet changes) can be gold mines, how to identify which 20% of your efforts produce 80% of your complaints, and why building a truly scalable cleaning business requires recognizing these patterns.Ready to work smarter rather than harder? Listen now to discover how to analyze your business through the Pareto lens and make strategic decisions that dramatically increase profitability while reducing unnecessary work. Your future self—and your bank account—will thank you!Send us a text It can be crowed when trying to figure out who you are going to learn from Up your cleaning game, join over 6000 Cleaning Business Owners most of whom are located here in the United States. Support the showQuestions? Feel free to reach out!Shannon Miller: cleaningbusinesslife@gmail.com Join my FB Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/1583362158497744YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCIjMz_-9YyiFvNVIgb61iYgSee Shannon's latest courses: www.KleanFreaksUnversity.com

If you are thinking about strategic planning, this episode is for you! Host Sarah Olivieri and special guest Doug Paul talk strategy and impact combining their 40+ years of strategy experience. They cover strategic planning, execution, and maintaining a balance between passion-driven goals and practical actions and go into some key concepts like the Pareto principle, assumptions mapping, and the difference between process goals and outcome goals. This episode is packed with actionable advice for ambitious nonprofit leaders! Episode Highlights 02:12 Challenges and Strategies in Nonprofit Leadership 04:36 The Importance of Integrating Strategy and Execution 05:52 Balancing Passion and Discipline 08:42 Developing and Implementing Effective Strategies 24:02 The Role of Boards and Stakeholders Meet the Guest Doug Paul is a Managing Partner and Innovation Strategist of Catapult, an organization that helps leaders build successful non-profits that scale. In addition to working with more than 1300 nonprofits over the course of his career, he's written the bestselling book Ready or Not and lives in Richmond, Virginia, along with his wife, Elizabeth, three kids, and great Dane Oliver. Connect with Doug: https://wearecatapult.org/ Sponsored Resource Join the Inspired Nonprofit Leadership Newsletter for weekly tips and inspiration for leading your nonprofit! Access it here >> Be sure to subscribe to Inspired Nonprofit Leadership so that you don't miss a single episode, and while you're at it, won't you take a moment to write a short review and rate our show? It would be greatly appreciated! Let us know the topics or questions you would like to hear about in a future episode. You can do that and follow us on LinkedIn.

In this episode of the YouTube Creators Hub podcast, Dusty Porter interviews Cara Nicole, a full-time YouTuber known for her educational video essays that blend personal finance with pop culture. Kara shares her journey from sporadic video creation in high school to establishing a successful channel with over 250,000 subscribers. She discusses the structure of her video essays, the challenges of predicting viral content, and her transition to full-time content creation. What We Offer Creators Join Creator Communities. A place to gather with other creators every single day. This provides access to Our Private Discord Server, Monthly Mastermind Group, and MORE!  Hire Dusty To Be Your YouTube Coach Subscribe to our weekly newsletter: Each week I document what I'm doing in my business and creative journey, share new things I've discovered, mistakes I've made, and much more!  

Where else can you get a discussion about the football spring portal, animal fights, college baseball, Pareto's principle, how the cost of customer acquisition relates to NIL, and a ranking of the best college football programs in Texas? The time is now for your new mortgage or refi with Gabe Winslow at 832-557-1095 or MortgagesbyGabe. Then get your financial life in order with advisor David McClellan 312-933-8823 with a free consult: dmcclellan@forumfinancial.com. Read his retirement tax bomb series at Kiplinger! https://www.kiplinger.com/retirement/retirement-planning/605109/is-your-retirement-portfolio-a-tax-bomb Need a great CenTex realtor? Contact Laura Baker at 512-784-0505 or laura@andyallenteam.com.

This time around, we have a bit of a different format, featuring the book that started it all for me, The 4-Hour Workweek. Readers and listeners often ask me what I would change or update, but an equally interesting question is: what wouldn't I change? What stands the test of time and hasn't lost any potency? This episode features one of the most important chapters from the audiobook of The 4-Hour Workweek. It includes tools and frameworks that I use to this day, including Pareto's Law and Parkinson's Law. The chapter is narrated by the great voice actor Ray Porter. If you are interested in checking out the rest of the audiobook, which is produced and copyrighted by Blackstone Publishing, you can find it on Audible, Apple, Google, Spotify, Downpour.com, or wherever you find your favorite audiobooks.Sponsors:ExpressVPN high-speed, secure, and anonymous VPN service: https://www.expressvpn.com/tim (get 3 or 4 months free on their annual plans) Momentous high-quality supplements: https://livemomentous.com/tim (code TIM for 20% off)Helix Sleep premium mattresses: https://HelixSleep.com/Tim (Between 20% and 27% off all mattress orders and two free pillows)*For show notes and past guests on The Tim Ferriss Show, please visit tim.blog/podcast.For deals from sponsors of The Tim Ferriss Show, please visit tim.blog/podcast-sponsorsSign up for Tim's email newsletter (5-Bullet Friday) at tim.blog/friday.For transcripts of episodes, go to tim.blog/transcripts.Discover Tim's books: tim.blog/books.Follow Tim:Twitter: twitter.com/tferriss Instagram: instagram.com/timferrissYouTube: youtube.com/timferrissFacebook: facebook.com/timferriss LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/timferrissPast guests on The Tim Ferriss Show include Jerry Seinfeld, Hugh Jackman, Dr. Jane Goodall, LeBron James, Kevin Hart, Doris Kearns Goodwin, Jamie Foxx, Matthew McConaughey, Esther Perel, Elizabeth Gilbert, Terry Crews, Sia, Yuval Noah Harari, Malcolm Gladwell, Madeleine Albright, Cheryl Strayed, Jim Collins, Mary Karr, Maria Popova, Sam Harris, Michael Phelps, Bob Iger, Edward Norton, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Neil Strauss, Ken Burns, Maria Sharapova, Marc Andreessen, Neil Gaiman, Neil de Grasse Tyson, Jocko Willink, Daniel Ek, Kelly Slater, Dr. Peter Attia, Seth Godin, Howard Marks, Dr. Brené Brown, Eric Schmidt, Michael Lewis, Joe Gebbia, Michael Pollan, Dr. Jordan Peterson, Vince Vaughn, Brian Koppelman, Ramit Sethi, Dax Shepard, Tony Robbins, Jim Dethmer, Dan Harris, Ray Dalio, Naval Ravikant, Vitalik Buterin, Elizabeth Lesser, Amanda Palmer, Katie Haun, Sir Richard Branson, Chuck Palahniuk, Arianna Huffington, Reid Hoffman, Bill Burr, Whitney Cummings, Rick Rubin, Dr. Vivek Murthy, Darren Aronofsky, Margaret Atwood, Mark Zuckerberg, Peter Thiel, Dr. Gabor Maté, Anne Lamott, Sarah Silverman, Dr. Andrew Huberman, and many more.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.