Podcasts about Pareto

La idea central del episodio es el Límite WIP tres: produce más haciendo menos a la vez. Para verlo, piensa en los hermanos Wright: sin gran presupuesto, redujeron variables y probaron una cosa a la vez con un túnel de viento. Al limitar lo que estaban haciendo, avanzaron más rápido, aprendieron mejor y corrigieron temprano. No se trató de hacer muchas cosas, sino de elegir tres proyectos clave y terminarlos uno tras otro. En este marco, se fusionan Pareto, la ley de Parkinson, Pomodoro y trucos como plantillas y atajos para acelerar sin perder el enfoque.El método se despliega con un tablero mínimo (Por hacer, En curso, Enviado) y seis pasos prácticos: priorizar con Pareto, mantener En curso en tres tarjetas, dar a cada tarea un entregable concreto, reservar tres bloques de cuarenta y cinco minutos con cierre de diez para enviar y medir, usar plantillas y el botón duplicar para avanzar rápido, y gestionar el correo en dos tandas. Una historia real ilustra el impacto: un SaaS pasó de múltiples tareas abiertas a tres entregas diarias y un incremento en ingresos al aplicar Límite WIP tres. ¿Qué pasaría si lo pruebas mañana con tres tareas que mueven euros y un bloque de foco sin distracciones?Conviértete en un seguidor de este podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/productividad-maxima--5279700/support.Newsletter Marketing Radical: https://marketingradical.substack.com/welcomeNewsletter Negocios con IA: https://negociosconia.substack.com/welcomeMis Libros: https://borjagiron.com/librosSysteme Gratis: https://borjagiron.com/systemeSysteme 30% dto: https://borjagiron.com/systeme30Manychat Gratis: https://borjagiron.com/manychatMetricool 30 días Gratis Plan Premium (Usa cupón BORJA30): https://borjagiron.com/metricoolNoticias Redes Sociales: https://redessocialeshoy.comNoticias IA: https://inteligenciaartificialhoy.comClub: https://triunfers.com

Este episodio presenta la Agenda KISS 3-1-1: una estrategia de productividad que demuestra que la simplicidad impulsa el crecimiento sin complicarte la vida. Nace de la experiencia del Skunk Works de Lockheed y del principio KISS (Keep It Simple, Simple): cuanto más simple es el sistema, menos fallos y más velocidad. En el negocio real se traduce en tres pilares claros: tres bloques de crecimiento, una venta diaria y una mejora operativa, todo medible y enfocado en lo esencial.La guía práctica propone organizar el día en tres bloques de 45 minutos para crecimiento (con Pomodoro y un cierre de 10 minutos para documentar), una venta diaria que termine en enviar o proponer, y una mejora operativa pequeña pero perceptible (plantillas, duplicar una landing, una checklist). Apoyada en Pareto, Parkinson y GTD, la rutina se potencia con herramientas simples y atajos que ahorran tiempo. El episodio ofrece ejemplos, una historia de éxito y señales de progreso, y cierra invitándote a unirte al Club de Emprendedores Triunfers para avanzar junto a una comunidad que acompaña el camino.Conviértete en un seguidor de este podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/productividad-maxima--5279700/support.Newsletter Marketing Radical: https://marketingradical.substack.com/welcomeNewsletter Negocios con IA: https://negociosconia.substack.com/welcomeMis Libros: https://borjagiron.com/librosSysteme Gratis: https://borjagiron.com/systemeSysteme 30% dto: https://borjagiron.com/systeme30Manychat Gratis: https://borjagiron.com/manychatMetricool 30 días Gratis Plan Premium (Usa cupón BORJA30): https://borjagiron.com/metricoolNoticias Redes Sociales: https://redessocialeshoy.comNoticias IA: https://inteligenciaartificialhoy.comClub: https://triunfers.com

How To Lower Your ACoS in Amazon PPC starts here on That Amazon Ads Podcast.If Amazon PPC and Amazon Ads are draining profit, learn the two levers that cut ACoS fast without killing sales.Stephen and Andrew show a click-by-click system: lower CPC with precise bid and placement controls, and raise RPC by pruning non-converting traffic and reallocating to what converts.You'll see why sorting by highest ACoS fails, how to follow the spend, and where Top of Search multipliers, auto/broad, and negatives fit.We demo CPC vs RPC diagnostics (e.g., CPC up 10%, RPC down 10% → ~20% ACoS surge) and a Pareto workflow that fixes the few campaigns driving most spend.Watch now to master Amazon PPC inside That Amazon Ads Podcast, and bookmark this if you need a refresher on How To Lower Your ACoS in Amazon PPC with Amazon Ads.

My guest this week is Andrew Hulbert, founder of Pareto FM, who started his business from his bedroom at 27 with no name, network, or funding and grew it to a £42 million turnover before exiting less than a decade later.Andrew's story is one of calculated risk, relentless focus, and smart scaling. From landing his first £200,000 contract with the Bulgari Hotel to winning major clients like Twitter, ASOS, and Deliveroo, his approach to business growth was simple: do what big companies get wrong, and do it exceptionally well.In this episode, we discuss the realities of starting from zero, why being “too small” can become your biggest advantage, and how creating sweet equity helped him retain every senior hire across nine years. Andrew also shares what life looks like post-exit. Family, friends, and purpose and what it truly takes to let go without losing identity.If you're at the stage where you're thinking of starting, scaling, or selling, this conversation will help you think more strategically about risk, people, and purpose.Key Takeaways:Start with One Win: Focus on getting your first deal, not the perfect business plan. Momentum starts with movement.People Are Everything: Hire for motivation, not CVs. Pareto's 17 senior leaders stayed through to exit because they shared the vision and had skin in the game.Be Willing to Bet on Growth: Andrew's decision to reinvest £1 million into overheads helped double the company's value in two years.Know When to Step Back: The biggest challenge isn't starting, it's letting go. Learning to trust others is what takes a founder from operator to leader.Redefine Success After Exit: Freedom doesn't come from a payout, it comes from presence—being there for family, friends, and yourself.

Bienvenido al episodio de Productividad Máxima, donde la Ruta Crítica Personal 45 transforma una idea de gestión de proyectos en un hábito diario. El concepto viene de la Ruta Crítica creada a finales de los años cincuenta por ingenieros de DuPont y James Kelley: unos pocos pasos pueden decidir la fecha de entrega; si esos pasos se atrasan, todo lo demás importa menos. La gran lección para emprendedores es simple pero poderosa: identifica hoy tus dos o tres pasos críticos o tu negocio caminará con un freno de mano puesto. En este episodio te enseño a convertir esa lección en músculo diario usando Pareto, Parkinson, Pomodoro y GTD, junto con plantillas, atajos y el botón duplicar para avanzar sin perder calidad.El método se resume en cinco movimientos: 1) define el objetivo del día con verbo, objeto y medida; 2) mapea las dependencias y marca los pasos que, si fallan, retrasan todo; 3) bloquea 45 minutos de foco y cierra con 15 para enviar, medir y documentar; 4) avanza sin fricción mediante plantillas y duplicar para acelerar; 5) gestiona la comunicación en dos ventanas de 15 minutos para evitar la ansiedad. La historia de Marta, una consultora que pasó de diez tareas abiertas a tres entregables diarios y un incremento de ingresos gracias a este enfoque, ilustra el impacto. Si quieres probarlo, escribe hoy tu objetivo con verbo/objeto/medida y señala dos pasos críticos, bloquea el tiempo y usa la plantilla duplicada para iniciar mañana; verás cómo menos ruido se traduce en resultados tangibles.Conviértete en un seguidor de este podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/productividad-maxima--5279700/support.Newsletter Marketing Radical: https://marketingradical.substack.com/welcomeNewsletter Negocios con IA: https://negociosconia.substack.com/welcomeMis Libros: https://borjagiron.com/librosSysteme Gratis: https://borjagiron.com/systemeSysteme 30% dto: https://borjagiron.com/systeme30Manychat Gratis: https://borjagiron.com/manychatMetricool 30 días Gratis Plan Premium (Usa cupón BORJA30): https://borjagiron.com/metricoolNoticias Redes Sociales: https://redessocialeshoy.comNoticias IA: https://inteligenciaartificialhoy.comClub: https://triunfers.com

En este episodio de Productividad Máxima se presenta Working Backwards Diario, una estrategia que empieza por el final: se escribe una nota de prensa ficticia y una página de preguntas frecuentes como si el producto ya existiera, y luego se revisa con un memo de seis páginas para pensar mejor. La clave es definir el resultado con verbo, objeto y medida desde el inicio para evitar meses de trabajo que nadie pagará. Cada mañana, se redacta en tres párrafos el anuncio del avance del día, se ejecuta en un bloque de cuarenta y cinco minutos y se cierra con quince minutos de envío, medición y documentación. Este ciclo convierte tareas borrosas en objetivos concretos y accionables, reduciendo la procrastinación y el perfeccionismo.El método se apoya en Pareto para priorizar lo que realmente genera ingresos, reduce riesgos o impulsa el crecimiento; se protege el foco con bloques de tiempo y plantillas/atajos que facilitan la repetición. Además, se aplica GTD en comunicaciones con la regla de dos minutos y se evita revisar correo hasta terminar el primer párrafo de la nota. El episodio ilustra todo con un caso práctico: Jorge, tras tres semanas, dejó mil pestañas abiertas y firmó dos mil setecientos euros extra gracias a tres avances reales diarios. ¿Qué podría avanzar mañana si te atreves a probar este enfoque y cierras cada bloque con envío y medición?Conviértete en un seguidor de este podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/productividad-maxima--5279700/support.Newsletter Marketing Radical: https://marketingradical.substack.com/welcomeNewsletter Negocios con IA: https://negociosconia.substack.com/welcomeMis Libros: https://borjagiron.com/librosSysteme Gratis: https://borjagiron.com/systemeSysteme 30% dto: https://borjagiron.com/systeme30Manychat Gratis: https://borjagiron.com/manychatMetricool 30 días Gratis Plan Premium (Usa cupón BORJA30): https://borjagiron.com/metricoolNoticias Redes Sociales: https://redessocialeshoy.comNoticias IA: https://inteligenciaartificialhoy.comClub: https://triunfers.com

Bienvenido al podcast Productividad Máxima. Hoy te presento una estrategia de productividad llamada Cierre de Bucles Zeigarnik: aprovechar el efecto Zeigarnik para liberar tu cabeza y producir mejor. La historia de Bluma Zeigarnik en un café de Viena muestra que lo que quedó pendiente se mantiene activo en nuestra mente, mientras lo ya hecho se borra. Esa observación se transforma en un sistema práctico: lo que no cierras ocupa espacio mental y, al cerrarlo, tu foco se expande. Combina GTD, Pomodoro, la ley de Parkinson y automatizaciones para terminar más y pensar menos.El método se ejecuta en bloques de 45 minutos con un cierre claro al final (enviar, calendarizar, delegar o descartar) y se apoya en pasos como barrido mental rápido, convertir cada idea en una acción con verbo y medida, y dos ventanas diarias para respuestas. En la historia de Andrés, quien tenía quince pestañas abiertas, cerrar tres bloques le permitió enviar trabajos y, en tres semanas, sumar 2.500 euros extra sin trabajar más horas. Si te intriga, prueba mañana: haz un barrido de cabeza de cinco minutos, identifica tres tareas con impacto Pareto y programa tres bloques de cuarenta y cinco minutos; prepara una plantilla duplicable para empezar el primer bloque con un objetivo en verbo, objeto y medida. Y si buscas acompañamiento, el episodio sugiere un club de emprendedores para no emprender en solitario.Conviértete en un seguidor de este podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/productividad-maxima--5279700/support.Newsletter Marketing Radical: https://marketingradical.substack.com/welcomeNewsletter Negocios con IA: https://negociosconia.substack.com/welcomeMis Libros: https://borjagiron.com/librosSysteme Gratis: https://borjagiron.com/systemeSysteme 30% dto: https://borjagiron.com/systeme30Manychat Gratis: https://borjagiron.com/manychatMetricool 30 días Gratis Plan Premium (Usa cupón BORJA30): https://borjagiron.com/metricoolNoticias Redes Sociales: https://redessocialeshoy.comNoticias IA: https://inteligenciaartificialhoy.comClub: https://triunfers.com

Bienvenido al episodio sobre el Protocolo Bletchley: una misión prioritaria por día, un bloque profundo de cincuenta minutos y un cierre con envío real. En la historia de Bletchley Park, criptoanalistas descubrieron que cambiar de tarea desconcentraba al equipo; al estandarizar pasos, trabajar por lotes y entregar en ventanas fijas, la información llegaba a tiempo y se salvan vidas. La gran lección para emprendedores: sin foco, tu mejor talento se dispersa; con foco, incluso un equipo pequeño puede vencer al caos.El protocolo se sostiene en tres movimientos: definir una misión con filtro Pareto, reservar un bloque de cincuenta minutos (40 para producir y 10 para cerrar y enviar) y terminar con un envío medible o una siguiente acción delegada. Acelera con duplicar lo maestra y usar atajos, y añade dos micro-ventanas de soporte para aplicar la regla de dos minutos. Historias como la Paula realzan el método: más entregables y ingresos extra sin trabajar más horas. Mañana, escribe tu misión, reserva el bloque Bletchley y prepara un checklist de cierre en cinco pasos. Si quieres apoyo continuo, el Club de Emprendedores Triunfers ofrece coworking, formación y una comunidad para mantener el foco.Conviértete en un seguidor de este podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/productividad-maxima--5279700/support.Newsletter Marketing Radical: https://marketingradical.substack.com/welcomeNewsletter Negocios con IA: https://negociosconia.substack.com/welcomeMis Libros: https://borjagiron.com/librosSysteme Gratis: https://borjagiron.com/systemeSysteme 30% dto: https://borjagiron.com/systeme30Manychat Gratis: https://borjagiron.com/manychatMetricool 30 días Gratis Plan Premium (Usa cupón BORJA30): https://borjagiron.com/metricoolNoticias Redes Sociales: https://redessocialeshoy.comNoticias IA: https://inteligenciaartificialhoy.comClub: https://triunfers.com

En este episodio se revela MVE: Mínimo Viable Enviado, una estrategia para facturar antes y aprender más rápido. La premisa es simple pero poderosa: produce y envía cada día una pieza pequeña y útil, sin perderte en el perfeccionismo. La historia de Drew Houston, fundador de Dropbox, ilustra el truco: un video corto que mostraba cómo funcionaría su producto hizo despegar la lista de espera. Si no envías, no cobras; si no cobras, no aprendes; y sin aprendizaje, te quedas en bucle. El método se desglosa en cinco pasos: definir la pieza enviable, priorizar con Pareto, fijar un contenedor de tiempo, acelerar con plantillas y atajos, y cerrar con una documentación mínima para poder repetir.En la práctica, el caso de Sergio, freelance de anuncios, demuestra el efecto: tres semanas aplicando MVE y resultados reales, con ingresos extras y una rutina de entregas diarias. Dos pomodoros por día, una pieza enviada y un resumen para documentar ya generan progreso. La guía propone una acción para hoy: escribir tres piezas enviables, elegir una, reservar dos pomodoros y un cierre de diez minutos para enviar y registrar el avance. El énfasis está en entregar valor rápido, no en buscar la perfección. ¿Te animas a probar MVE y convertir cada día en un avance concreto para tu negocio?Conviértete en un seguidor de este podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/productividad-maxima--5279700/support.Newsletter Marketing Radical: https://marketingradical.substack.com/welcomeNewsletter Negocios con IA: https://negociosconia.substack.com/welcomeMis Libros: https://borjagiron.com/librosSysteme Gratis: https://borjagiron.com/systemeSysteme 30% dto: https://borjagiron.com/systeme30Manychat Gratis: https://borjagiron.com/manychatMetricool 30 días Gratis Plan Premium (Usa cupón BORJA30): https://borjagiron.com/metricoolNoticias Redes Sociales: https://redessocialeshoy.comNoticias IA: https://inteligenciaartificialhoy.comClub: https://triunfers.com

Bienvenido al episodio de Productividad Máxima, donde aparece la estrategia SPRINT 45-15: tres bloques de cuarenta y cinco minutos de foco intenso, seguidos de quince para convertir el trabajo en valor enviado, medido o delegado. Arrancamos con la historia de Apollo 13, un equipo bajo presión que ordenó el caos priorizando lo vital y cerrando cada tarea con un envío real. Ese mismo principio guía cada jornada: elegir lo crucial, cortar lo accesorio y diseñar procesos que conviertan energía en resultados. En menos, te ofrecen una ruta práctica que junta hábitos atómicos, la ley de Pareto y Parkinson para hacer del tiempo una palanca de progreso. ¿Qué pasaría si cada día fuera una serie de 45-15, con foco claro y cierre operativo?Se desglosan cinco pasos para hacer del sprint una rutina: anclajes breves que activan el modo foco, selección por impacto utilizando Pareto, ejecución de 45 sin distracciones, cierre de 15 con envío, docu-mentación y delegación, y una higiene de velocidad basada en atajos. Casos reales, como Nuria, muestran cómo tres sprints pueden generar ingresos extra y dejar tres avances concretos al día. Además, hay una guía lista para mañana: definir la tarea grande y dos medianas con verbo, objeto y medida, y planear qué se enviará exactamente en cada quince. Si buscas avanzar sin trabajar más horas, este episodio propone transformar impulso en resultados tangibles y, quizás, despertar la curiosidad sobre cuánto podría crecer tu negocio con un simple cambio de ritmo.Conviértete en un seguidor de este podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/productividad-maxima--5279700/support.Newsletter Marketing Radical: https://marketingradical.substack.com/welcomeNewsletter Negocios con IA: https://negociosconia.substack.com/welcomeMis Libros: https://borjagiron.com/librosSysteme Gratis: https://borjagiron.com/systemeSysteme 30% dto: https://borjagiron.com/systeme30Manychat Gratis: https://borjagiron.com/manychatMetricool 30 días Gratis Plan Premium (Usa cupón BORJA30): https://borjagiron.com/metricoolNoticias Redes Sociales: https://redessocialeshoy.comNoticias IA: https://inteligenciaartificialhoy.comClub: https://triunfers.com

No cenário dinâmico do marketing digital e das vendas, a busca pela previsibilidade e eficiência tornou-se uma obsessão. Empresas de todos os portes anseiam por transformar o processo de vendas de uma “arte” intuitiva e, por vezes, caótica, em uma “ciência” replicável e escalável. Mas, seria essa transição meramente técnica? Ou há um profundo embate cultural e psicológico em jogo? O episódio do podcast Growth Diaries, com a participação de Daniel Lestinge, fundador da Blue Forecast, desvenda as complexidades dessa jornada, expondo a tensão entre a natureza humana dos vendedores e a frieza implacável dos dados. Mais do que um mero relatório de vendas, o que emerge é um manifesto sobre como a gestão de dados pode, paradoxalmente, humanizar e otimizar a máquina de receita, desde que se compreenda a intrincada dança entre pessoas, processos e algoritmos.A Evolução da Gestão Comercial: Do Grito ao AlgoritmoA história da gestão comercial é uma jornada fascinante, pontuada por transformações radicais. Houve um tempo em que o sucesso em vendas era sinônimo de carisma, persuasão e, muitas vezes, de uma boa dose de “gritos e motivação” por parte dos gestores. Era uma era onde a intuição reinava soberana, e a performance individual era celebrada, mas dificilmente replicável ou escalável. Max Weber, o sociólogo alemão, já observava no início do século XX a tendência da sociedade moderna à racionalização, onde a eficiência e a calculabilidade suplantariam a tradição e a emoção (Weber, 1978). Essa racionalização, que ele via nas burocracias, hoje se manifesta na busca incessante por métricas e processos no universo das vendas.Daniel Lestinge, com sua trajetória que migra de vendas para dados, é um testemunho vivo dessa evolução. Ele representa a nova guarda, que entende que a paixão e a motivação continuam sendo cruciais, mas precisam ser ancoradas em um arcabouço de dados e processos. O modelo artesanal, onde o “feeling” do vendedor era o KPI supremo, cede lugar a uma gestão que busca transformar a operação de vendas em uma “fábrica de receita” previsível. Não se trata de desumanizar, mas de otimizar. Como argumenta Peter Drucker, “o que não pode ser medido, não pode ser gerenciado” (Drucker, 1954). E no mundo das vendas, gerenciar significa entender o que funciona, por que funciona, e como replicar esse sucesso em escala.O Calcanhar de Aquiles Humano: Vendedores e o CRMApesar da inegável lógica por trás da gestão de vendas baseada em dados, o maior desafio reside, ironicamente, no elemento humano. Vendedores, por sua própria natureza, são movidos pela emoção, pela conexão pessoal e pela liberdade de ação. A ideia de preencher meticulosamente um CRM, seguir roteiros rígidos ou aderir a processos padronizados pode soar como uma camisa de força para muitos. Essa resistência não é meramente uma questão de preguiça ou má vontade; é um reflexo de vieses cognitivos e da aversão à perda, conceitos explorados por Daniel Kahneman e Amos Tversky em sua Teoria da Perspectiva (Kahneman & Tversky, 1979). A mudança de um método familiar para um novo, mesmo que comprovadamente mais eficiente, é percebida como uma perda de autonomia ou de um “jeito de fazer” que já trouxe resultados.A Blue Forecast, ao se deparar com essa realidade, precisou desenvolver uma abordagem que não apenas implementasse ferramentas de dados, mas que também promovesse uma profunda mudança cultural. A solução não está em impor, mas em demonstrar o valor. Quando os vendedores percebem que o CRM não é um instrumento de controle, mas uma ferramenta que os ajuda a fechar mais negócios, a gerenciar melhor seu pipeline e a identificar oportunidades que antes passariam despercebidas, a resistência diminui. É uma questão de traduzir a linguagem dos dados para a linguagem dos resultados tangíveis na vida do vendedor. Como Lestinge aponta, a gestão comercial precisa de visibilidade e controle, especialmente em ambientes remotos, e essa visibilidade só é alcançada com dados confiáveis, gerados por processos bem definidos.Data as a Service: O Modelo Blue Forecast e a Democratização da AnáliseA complexidade de montar e manter uma equipe de dados interna é um obstáculo significativo para muitas empresas, especialmente as de médio porte que faturam acima de 10 milhões por ano, mas que ainda não possuem a maturidade para um departamento de dados robusto. É nesse vácuo que o modelo “time de dados por assinatura” da Blue Forecast se posiciona como uma solução estratégica. Esse modelo reflete uma tendência econômica mais ampla: a “economia de serviços” ou “as-a-service” (SaaS, PaaS, IaaS), onde empresas podem acessar expertise e infraestrutura de ponta sem os custos fixos e os desafios de recrutamento e retenção de talentos.Ao oferecer times de dados por assinatura, a Blue Forecast democratiza o acesso à inteligência de negócios avançada. Empresas como Embracon e Ser Ronda, que talvez hesitassem em investir em uma estrutura de dados própria, podem agora alavancar análises sofisticadas para otimizar suas operações de vendas. Isso permite que se concentrem em seu core business, enquanto especialistas gerenciam a complexidade dos dados. É uma terceirização estratégica que não apenas reduz custos, mas também acelera a curva de aprendizado e a implementação de melhores práticas, conforme o conceito de vantagem competitiva de Michael Porter (Porter, 1985).A “Fábrica de Receita”: Previsibilidade em um Mundo IncertoA visão de transformar a operação de vendas em uma “fábrica de receita” é o cerne da proposta da Blue Forecast e um conceito poderoso para o marketing digital. Em um mercado cada vez mais volátil e competitivo, a previsibilidade é um ativo inestimável. Uma “fábrica de receita” implica um sistema onde as entradas (leads, atividades de vendas) são processadas de forma consistente para gerar saídas (vendas, receita) com uma taxa de conversão conhecida e gerenciável. Isso exige a aplicação de princípios de gestão de processos, como os popularizados pelo Lean Manufacturing e Six Sigma na indústria, adaptados para o universo das vendas (Womack & Jones, 2003).A chave para essa previsibilidade é a definição clara de processos e a medição constante de KPIs. Sem dados confiáveis, a “fábrica” operaria no escuro, sujeita a flutuações e ineficiências. Com eles, é possível identificar gargalos, otimizar etapas e prever resultados com maior acurácia. A previsibilidade não elimina a necessidade de inovação ou de adaptação a mudanças de mercado, mas fornece uma base sólida para a tomada de decisões, permitindo que as empresas reajam de forma proativa, e não apenas reativa.Governança de Dados: O Alicerce InvisívelUm dos pontos cruciais levantados por Lestinge é a necessidade de homologação dos dados. Em muitos casos, as empresas sequer possuem uma definição clara do que constitui uma “venda” ou um “lead qualificado”. Sem essa padronização, qualquer análise de dados será falha, construída sobre areia movediça. A governança de dados, portanto, torna-se o alicerce invisível sobre o qual toda a “fábrica de receita” é construída.A homologação envolve alinhar critérios, criar campos padronizados no CRM e garantir que todos os membros da equipe compreendam e sigam esses padrões. É um trabalho minucioso, mas essencial. Filosoficamente, pode-se traçar um paralelo com a busca pela verdade e consistência na epistemologia. Para que o conhecimento (neste caso, os insights de dados) seja válido, ele precisa ser fundamentado em premissas claras e consistentes. Dados inconsistentes levam a conclusões equivocadas e, consequentemente, a decisões de negócios erradas. Como alertam Davenport e Dyché, sem uma boa governança, os dados podem se tornar um passivo, não um ativo (Davenport & Dyché, 2013).Além dos Dashboards: A Cultura Data-Driven na PráticaTer dashboards bonitos é um bom começo, mas a verdadeira transformação acontece quando os dados permeiam a cultura organizacional. Daniel Lestinge destaca como as reuniões se transformam após a implementação das soluções da Blue Forecast. De debates improdutivos focados em atribuição de culpa, elas evoluem para sessões focadas em soluções e acompanhamento de iniciativas, utilizando ferramentas como PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) e 5W2H.Essa mudança de cultura é um desafio sociológico e psicológico complexo. Requer que os líderes modelem o comportamento desejado, que a equipe seja treinada para interpretar e agir com base nos dados, e que haja um ambiente de segurança psicológica onde os erros sejam vistos como oportunidades de aprendizado, não de punição. Edgar Schein, renomado teórico da cultura organizacional, enfatiza que a cultura é moldada por artefatos, valores e pressupostos básicos, e que a mudança cultural é um processo lento e deliberado (Schein, 2017). Ao transformar a forma como as reuniões são conduzidas, a Blue Forecast está, de fato, reescrevendo os rituais e as normas que sustentam a cultura de vendas de seus clientes.O Dilema da Imagem vs. Entrega: Lições do Ecossistema DigitalUm dos insights mais provocadores do episódio do Growth Diaries foi a reflexão sobre a influência das redes sociais e os “influenciadores corporativos”. Daniel e Victor observaram que, muitas vezes, há um foco excessivo na imagem dos fundadores e na retórica inspiradora, em detrimento da entrega real de valor estruturado. Essa crítica ressoa com a teoria da “sociedade do espetáculo” de Guy Debord, que descrevia uma sociedade onde as relações sociais são mediadas por imagens e o consumo de representações se sobrepõe à experiência direta e autêntica (Debord, 1994).No contexto do marketing digital e da educação corporativa, essa tendência pode ser perigosa. Empresas e indivíduos que constroem sua reputação apenas na imagem, sem a substância de processos sólidos e resultados concretos, correm o risco de se tornar “castelos de areia”. A mensagem de Daniel é clara: a entrega de resultados tangíveis e a transformação contínua são o que realmente fidelizam o cliente. Em uma era de excesso de informação e de “gurus” instantâneos, a autenticidade e a capacidade de gerar valor real são os diferenciais competitivos mais poderosos.A Autonomia do Cliente: Infraestrutura e FlexibilidadeUm aspecto técnico, mas de grande impacto estratégico, é a decisão da Blue Forecast de implantar todas as soluções na infraestrutura do cliente. Essa abordagem, que pode parecer mais trabalhosa à primeira vista, é fundamental para garantir a autonomia do cliente e evitar a chamada “dependência de fornecedor” (vendor lock-in). Ao hospedar os dados e as ferramentas na própria infraestrutura do cliente (seja AWS, GCP ou outra), a Blue Forecast assegura que o cliente mantém a posse e o controle de seus ativos digitais.Essa estratégia reflete uma compreensão profunda do valor a longo prazo para o cliente. Não se trata apenas de entregar uma solução, mas de capacitar o cliente. Em um mundo onde a segurança e a soberania dos dados são cada vez mais críticas, essa escolha técnica se traduz em um benefício estratégico, reforçando a confiança e a parceria. Além disso, a flexibilidade em adaptar-se à stack tecnológica do cliente demonstra uma abordagem centrada no cliente, um pilar fundamental para o sucesso de qualquer empresa de serviços, como ressaltado por autores como Frederick Reichheld sobre a lealdade do cliente (Reichheld, 1996).O ROI da Transparência: Casos de Sucesso e RetençãoO valor da análise de dados em vendas é mais bem ilustrado pelos casos de sucesso. Lestinge citou o exemplo de uma empresa de Telecom do Espírito Santo que, após a implementação de dashboards e processos estruturados, viu sua retenção (Customer Success) saltar de 27% para 54%. Esse é um testemunho poderoso do ROI da transparência e da governança de dados. A retenção de clientes é, muitas vezes, mais lucrativa do que a aquisição de novos, um princípio econômico bem estabelecido no marketing.O aumento da retenção não é um resultado mágico; é a consequência direta de uma melhor compreensão do cliente, da identificação proativa de riscos de churn e da capacidade de agir com base em insights. Quando a equipe de CS tem acesso a dados confiáveis sobre o comportamento do cliente, o uso do produto e o histórico de interações, ela pode intervir de forma mais eficaz, oferecendo soluções personalizadas e fortalecendo o relacionamento. Esse é o poder de transformar dados em ações estratégicas que impactam diretamente o resultado final.O Caminho à Frente: Priorizando o EssencialA mensagem final de Daniel Lestinge é um lembrete valioso em um mundo saturado de informações e soluções complexas: comece simples. Ele orienta focar inicialmente em construir processos claros, definir poucos KPIs essenciais e garantir que o time de vendas funcione de forma coesa, antes de buscar soluções excessivamente complexas. Essa abordagem minimalista e pragmática ecoa o Princípio de Pareto (80/20), onde a maioria dos resultados advém de um número limitado de causas (Koch, 1998).No contexto do marketing digital e da gestão de vendas, isso significa resistir à tentação de implementar todas as ferramentas e métricas disponíveis de uma vez. Em vez disso, a prioridade deve ser estabelecer uma base sólida de dados confiáveis e processos operacionais eficientes. A jornada é gradual, e o principal é progredir com foco e “mão na massa”. É um convite à ação deliberada e estratégica, em vez de uma corrida desenfreada por todas as inovações tecnológicas.Conclusão: A Sinfonia de Dados e HumanidadeO bate-papo no Growth Diaries com Daniel Lestinge transcendeu a mera discussão sobre análise de dados e vendas. Ele nos convidou a uma reflexão profunda sobre a natureza do trabalho, a psicologia humana e a evolução da gestão na era digital. A “fábrica de receita” não é um ideal frio e desumano; é a materialização da busca por eficiência e previsibilidade, que, quando bem implementada, pode liberar os vendedores para se concentrarem no que fazem de melhor: conectar-se com pessoas.A verdadeira maestria reside em orquestrar a sinfonia entre a precisão dos algoritmos e a intuição humana, entre a rigidez dos processos e a flexibilidade da criatividade. O futuro das vendas e do marketing digital não é apenas sobre coletar dados, mas sobre interpretá-los com sabedoria, aplicar essa sabedoria com propósito e, acima de tudo, lembrar que, no final das contas, estamos lidando com pessoas. A jornada é contínua, os desafios são constantes, mas a promessa de uma operação de receita mais eficiente e previsível, que respeita e amplifica o potencial humano, é um horizonte que vale a pena perseguir. É hora de salvar, reparar e decidir: vamos construir fábricas de receita que nutrem a alma humana ou nos perderemos na busca incessante por métricas vazias? A escolha é nossa.Referências (Estilo MLA)Davenport, Thomas H., and Jill Dyché. The New IT: How Technology Leaders Are Shaping the Digital Future. McGraw-Hill Education, 2013.Debord, Guy. The Society of the Spectacle. Translated by Donald Nicholson-Smith, Zone Books, 1994.Drucker, Peter F. The Practice of Management. Harper & Row, 1954.Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk.” Econometrica, vol. 47, no. 2, 1979, pp. 263–91.Koch, Richard. The 80/20 Principle: The Secret to Achieving More with Less. Doubleday, 1998.Porter, Michael E. Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. Free Press, 1985.Reichheld, Frederick F. The Loyalty Effect: The Hidden Force Behind Growth, Profits, and Lasting Value. Harvard Business School Press, 1996.Schein, Edgar H. Organizational Culture and Leadership. 5th ed., Wiley, 2017.Weber, Max. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Edited by Guenther Roth and Claus Wittich, University of California Press, 1978.Womack, James P., and Daniel T. Jones. Lean Thinking: Banish Waste and Create Wealth in Your Corporation. Free Press, 2003. To hear more, visit victormignone.substack.com

En este episodio de Productividad Máxima se revela la Regla 1-3-5 Pareto: enfocar cada día en lo que realmente mueve euros. La idea arranca con la típica observación de Pareto: no todas las tareas pesan igual, así que si tratas todo como si valiera lo mismo, tu agenda se llena y tu negocio no avanza. El método es claro y práctico: escribe todo lo que tienes en la cabeza y en tus apps sin filtros, marca con una estrella las acciones que impactan ingresos, crecimiento o reducción de riesgos, elige una tarea grande e irrenunciable, tres medianas de apoyo y cinco microtareas, y cúbrelo en tres bloques de 45 minutos con Pomodoro para foco, descanso y revisión. La clave está en la entrega: empezar está bien, pero lo importante es cerrar y enviar.El episodio añade trucos como duplicar en tus herramientas, usar plantillas y aplicar la regla de dos minutos para las microtareas, y lo ilustra con un caso real: Diego, una agencia pequeña, logró ingresos extra en dos semanas simplemente cambiando cómo elegía y bloqueaba su trabajo. También se señalan señales de progreso y se propone una rutina lista para mañana. Si buscas mantener el foco y obtener resultados consistentes, hay una comunidad de apoyo y recursos que te esperan. ¿Qué veinte por ciento de acciones debes elegir mañana para que tu negocio avance más con menos esfuerzo?Conviértete en un seguidor de este podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/productividad-maxima--5279700/support.Newsletter Marketing Radical: https://marketingradical.substack.com/welcomeNewsletter Negocios con IA: https://negociosconia.substack.com/welcomeMis Libros: https://borjagiron.com/librosSysteme Gratis: https://borjagiron.com/systemeSysteme 30% dto: https://borjagiron.com/systeme30Manychat Gratis: https://borjagiron.com/manychatMetricool 30 días Gratis Plan Premium (Usa cupón BORJA30): https://borjagiron.com/metricoolNoticias Redes Sociales: https://redessocialeshoy.comNoticias IA: https://inteligenciaartificialhoy.comClub: https://triunfers.com

Bienvenido a un resumen que despierta curiosidad: Productividad Máxima propone convertir el caos en un cockpit de mando con Checklists de Alto Impacto. La idea nace de una historia real de aviación: un despegue con varias palancas en orden incorrecto demostró que no basta con habilidad, hace falta simplicidad. Desde entonces, la clave es seguir listas claras para cada fase del día y emprender con un sistema, no con la memoria. Te explico cómo adaptar este enfoque al negocio sin torres de control ni casco de piloto.El plan se apoya en tres checklists cortas y potentes: arranque, producción y cierre. Arranque: dos minutos para preparar el terreno; producción: bloques de 45 minutos con un objetivo concreto y un pomodoro para mantener foco; cierre: dos minutos para archivar y diseñar la mañana siguiente. Potencias simples como duplicar lo que funciona, plantillas y atajos, y el principio Pareto para priorizar lo que mueve euros. Ejemplos reales y una invitación al Club de Emprendedores Triunfers muestran cómo, con estas tres listas, la velocidad de entrega se traduce en resultados. ¿Te gustaría que te acompañe en ese viaje con herramientas, soporte y comunidad?Conviértete en un seguidor de este podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/productividad-maxima--5279700/support.Newsletter Marketing Radical: https://marketingradical.substack.com/welcomeNewsletter Negocios con IA: https://negociosconia.substack.com/welcomeMis Libros: https://borjagiron.com/librosSysteme Gratis: https://borjagiron.com/systemeSysteme 30% dto: https://borjagiron.com/systeme30Manychat Gratis: https://borjagiron.com/manychatMetricool 30 días Gratis Plan Premium (Usa cupón BORJA30): https://borjagiron.com/metricoolNoticias Redes Sociales: https://redessocialeshoy.comNoticias IA: https://inteligenciaartificialhoy.comClub: https://triunfers.com

La regla LPD—Lotes, Pareto y Duplicar—surge de la experiencia de Toyota tras la Segunda Guerra Mundial, cuando Taiichi Ohno demostró que casi todo lo que hacemos no aporta valor si el cliente no pagaría por ello. Identificaron desperdicios, trabajaron en lotes pequeños y paraban para corregir el origen de los problemas. El mensaje clave para emprendedores: lo que no añade valor es lastre. Con LPD consigues elegir bien, ejecutar más rápido y repetir sin fricción.En la práctica, LPD se divide en tres movimientos: Lotes para reducir cambios de contexto, Pareto para priorizar las acciones que generan ingresos y Duplicar para aprovechar plantillas y recursos ya probados. Se traduce en dos bloques de 45 minutos (producción y distribución), una disciplina de no multitarea, entregables mínimos y atajos de teclado para duplicar rápido. Un ejemplo real: Laura, creadora de cursos, aplicó LPD y en tres semanas incrementó su facturación y cerró su día con entregables enviados. ¿Qué pasaría si pruebas esto en tus próximos tres proyectos y ves tus resultados subir en tiempo récord?Conviértete en un seguidor de este podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/productividad-maxima--5279700/support.Newsletter Marketing Radical: https://marketingradical.substack.com/welcomeNewsletter Negocios con IA: https://negociosconia.substack.com/welcomeMis Libros: https://borjagiron.com/librosSysteme Gratis: https://borjagiron.com/systemeSysteme 30% dto: https://borjagiron.com/systeme30Manychat Gratis: https://borjagiron.com/manychatMetricool 30 días Gratis Plan Premium (Usa cupón BORJA30): https://borjagiron.com/metricoolNoticias Redes Sociales: https://redessocialeshoy.comNoticias IA: https://inteligenciaartificialhoy.comClub: https://triunfers.com

Aaron Benanav discusses the first part of his ‘Beyond Capitalism' essay series in the New Left Review. In this part he lays the groundwork for his proposal of a multi-criterial economy. SASE - Society for the Advancement of Socio-Economics: https://sase.org/ SASE Network I: Alternatives to Capitalism (including CfP): https://sase.org/networks/i-alternatives-to-capitalism/     Shownotes Aaron at Cornell University: https://cals.cornell.edu/people/aaron-benanav Aaron's personal website: https://www.aaronbenanav.com/ Access to Aaron's paywalled publications: https://www.aaronbenanav.com/papers Mailing List to join the Movement for Multi-Dimensional Economics: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSeUF7MZ2jQJXY_wHKn5xSIo-_L0tkMO-SG079sa5lGhRJTgqg/viewform Benanav, A. (2025). Beyond Capitalism—1. New Left Review, Issue 153, 65–128. https://newleftreview.org/issues/ii153/articles/aaron-benanav-beyond-capitalism-1 Benanav, A. (2025). Beyond Capitalism—2. New Left Review, Issue 154, 97–143. https://newleftreview.org/issues/ii154/articles/aaron-benanav-beyond-capitalism-2 Benanv, A. (2020). Automation and the Future of Work. Verso. https://www.versobooks.com/products/2682-automation-and-the-future-of-work on economic stagnation, see especially chapter 3, “In the Shadow of Stagnation”. on Marx's concept of the Value-Form: https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1867-c1/appendix.htm Moore, J.W. & Patel, R. (2020). A History of the World in Seven Cheap Things. A Guide to Capitalism, Nature, and the Future of the Planet. Verso. https://www.versobooks.com/products/817-a-history-of-the-world-in-seven-cheap-things on the abstract domination of capitalism: Postone, M. (1993). Time, Labor and Social Domination. A Reinterpretation of Marx's Critical Theory. Cambridge University Press. https://files.libcom.org/files/Moishe%20Postone%20-%20Time,%20Labor,%20and%20Social%20Domination.pdf Mau, S. (2023). Mute Compulsion. A Marxist Theory of the Economic Power of Capital. Verso. https://www.versobooks.com/products/2759-mute-compulsion Leipold, B. (2024). Citizen Marx. Republicanism and the Formation of Karl Marx's Social and Political Thought. Princeton University Press. https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691205236/citizen-marx on GDP (Gross Domestic Product): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gross_domestic_product on the Five-Year Plans in the Soviet Union: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five-year_plans_of_the_Soviet_Union Katsenelinboigen, A. (1977). Coloured Markets in the Soviet Union. Soviet Studies. Vol. 29, No.1. 62-85. https://www.jstor.org/stable/150728 Uvalić, M. (2018). The Rise and Fall of Market Socialism in Yugoslavia. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331223694_The_Rise_and_Fall_of_Market_Socialism_in_Yugoslavia on Friedrich Hayek: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friedrich_Hayek Hayek, F. A. (1945). The Use of Knowledge in Society. The American Economic Review, 35(4), 519–530. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1809376 on the Pareto Optimum: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareto_efficiency on Rational Choice Theory: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rational_choice_model on Behavioral Economics: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Behavioral_economics on Otto Neurath: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Otto_Neurath on Neurath's technocratic tendencies: https://jacobin.com/2023/02/technocratic-socialism-otto-neurath-utopianism-capitalism on Joseph Raz: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Raz on Utilitarianism: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilitarianism on the Capability Approach by Amartya Sen and Martha Nussbaum: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capability_approach on the Human Development Index (HDI): https://hdr.undp.org/data-center/human-development-index#/indicies/HDI on the Sustainability Development Goals (SDGs): https://sdgs.un.org/goals on Multi-Objective Optimization: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multi-objective_optimization Saros, D. E. (2014). Information Technology and Socialist Construction. The End of Capital and the Transition to Socialism. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Information-Technology-and-Socialist-Construction-The-End-of-Capital-and-the-Transition-to-Socialism/Saros/p/book/9780415742924 on Neoclassical Economics: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoclassical_economics on Citizen Assemblies and Sortition: https://www.sortitionfoundation.org/ on John Stuart Mill: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Stuart_Mill Mill, J. S. (2011). On Liberty. Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/on-liberty/62EC27F1E66E2BCBA29DDCD5294B3DE0 McCabe, H. (2021). John Stuart Mill, Socialist. McGill-Queen's University Press. https://www.mqup.ca/john-stuart-mill--socialist-products-9780228005742.php on Degrowth: https://degrowth.info/ on Nick Land and Right Accelerationism: https://youtu.be/lrOVKHg_PJQ?si=Q4oFbaM1p4fhcWP0 on Left Accelerationism: https://criticallegalthinking.com/2013/05/14/accelerate-manifesto-for-an-accelerationist-politics/ Devine, P. (2002). Participatory Planning through Negotiated Coordination. Science & Society, Vol. 66, No. 1, 72-85. https://guilfordjournals.com/doi/abs/10.1521/siso.66.1.72.21001?journalCode=siso on Oskar R. Lange: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oskar_R._Lange on Lange's neoclassical approach to Socialism: https://jacobin.com/2022/10/oskar-lange-neoclassical-marxism-limits-of-capitalism-economic-theory Kowalik, T. (1990). Lange-Lerner Mechanism. In: Eatwell, J., Milgate, M., Newman, P. (eds). Problems of the Planned Economy. Palgrave Macmillan. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-349-20863-0_21 on Joseph Schumpeters concept of Creative Destruction: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creative_destruction Shaikh, A. (2016). Capitalism. Competition, Conflict, Crises. Oxford Academic. https://academic.oup.com/book/1464 Kornai, J. (1980). “Hard” and “Soft” Budget Constraint. Acta Oeconomica, 25(3/4), 231–245. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40728773 on the Cobb-Douglas Production Function: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cobb%E2%80%93Douglas_production_function on Adam Smith: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Smith Lutosch, H. (2025). Embracing the Small Stuff. Caring for Children in a Liberated Society. In: Groos, J., & Sorg, C. (Eds.). (2025). Creative Construction. Democratic Planning in the 21st Century and Beyond. Bristol University Press. https://bristoluniversitypress.co.uk/creative-construction Hahnel, R. (2021). Democratic Economic Planning. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Democratic-Economic-Planning/Hahnel/p/book/9781032003320 Cockshott, P. & Cottrell, A. (1993). Towards a New Socialism. Spokesman. https://users.wfu.edu/cottrell/socialism_book/new_socialism.pdf on Universal Basic Services (UBS): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_basic_services https://autonomy.work/ubs-hub/ Fraser, N. & Sorg, C. (2025). Socialism, Planning and the Relativity of Dirt. In: Groos, J., & Sorg, C. (Eds.). (2025). Creative Construction. Democratic Planning in the 21st Century and Beyond. Bristol University Press. https://bristoluniversitypress.co.uk/creative-construction on Milton Friedman: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milton_Friedman on John Maynard Keynes: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Maynard_Keynes Aaron on what to learn from radical Keynesianism for a transitionary Program: Benanav, A. & Henwood, D. (2025). Behind the News. Beyond the Capitalist Economy w/ Aaron Benanav. https://open.spotify.com/episode/2diIiFkkM4x7MoZhi9e0tx on Socializing Finance: McCarthy, M. A. (2025). The Master's Tools. How Finance Wrecked Democracy (And a Radical Plan to Rebuild It). Verso. https://www.versobooks.com/products/755-the-master-s-tools Future Histories Episodes on Related Topics S3E47 | Jason W. Moore on Socialism in the Web of Life https://www.futurehistories.today/episoden-blog/s03/e47-jason-w-moore-on-socialism-in-the-web-of-life/ S03E29 | Nancy Fraser on Alternatives to Capitalism https://www.futurehistories.today/episoden-blog/s03/e29-nancy-fraser-on-alternatives-to-capitalism/ S03E04 | Tim Platenkamp on Republican Socialism, General Planning and Parametric Control https://www.futurehistories.today/episoden-blog/s03/e04-tim-platenkamp-on-republican-socialism-general-planning-and-parametric-control/ S02E33 | Pat Devine on Negotiated Coordination https://www.futurehistories.today/episoden-blog/s02/e33-pat-devine-on-negotiated-coordination/ S03E10 | Aaron Benanav on Associational Socialism and Democratic Planning https://www.futurehistories.today/episoden-blog/s02/e10-aaron-benanav-on-associational-socialism-and-democratic-planning/ S01E32 | Daniel E. Saros on Digital Socialism and the Abolition of Capital (Part 2) https://www.futurehistories.today/episoden-blog/s01/e32-daniel-e-saros-on-digital-socialism-and-the-abolition-of-capital-part-2/ S02E31 | Daniel E. Saros on Digital Socialism and the Abolition of Capital (Part 1) https://www.futurehistories.today/episoden-blog/s01/e31-daniel-e-saros-on-digital-socialism-and-the-abolition-of-capital-part-1/ --- If you are interested in democratic economic planning, these resources might be of help: Democratic planning – an information website https://www.democratic-planning.com/ Sorg, C. & Groos, J. (eds.)(2025). Rethinking Economic Planning. Competition & Change Special Issue Volume 29 Issue 1. https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/ccha/29/1 Groos, J. & Sorg, C. (2025). Creative Construction - Democratic Planning in the 21st Century and Beyond. Bristol University Press. [for a review copy, please contact: amber.lanfranchi[at]bristol.ac.uk] https://bristoluniversitypress.co.uk/creative-construction International Network for Democratic Economic Planning https://www.indep.network/ Democratic Planning Research Platform: https://www.planningresearch.net/ --- Future Histories Contact & Support If you like Future Histories, please consider supporting us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/join/FutureHistories Contact: office@futurehistories.today Twitter: https://twitter.com/FutureHpodcast Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/futurehpodcast/ Mastodon: https://mstdn.social/@FutureHistories English webpage: https://futurehistories-international.com   Episode Keywords #AaronBenanav, #JanGroos, #Interview, #FutureHistories, #FutureHistoriesInternational, #futurehistoriesinternational, #Transition, #DemocraticPlanning, #Keynes, #Efficiency, #Economics, #NeoclassicalEconomics, #NeoclassicalSocialism, #OttoNeurath, #DemocraticEconomicPlanning, #Capitalism, #Economics, #Socialism, #Socialisation, #Investment, #Degrowth, #UniversalBasicServices, #CareWork

Bienvenido al podcast Productividad Máxima. Hoy te traigo la Fórmula PPP, una mezcla de Pareto, Parkinson y Pomodoro que promete hacer más en menos horas. La historia de Parkinson muestra por qué el tiempo tiende a expandirse: si das tres horas a una tarea, ocuparás esas tres horas; si das cuarenta y cinco minutos, decidirás lo esencial y avanzarás. En la práctica, empieza con Pareto: captura todas las tareas y señala las que realmente empujan ingresos, crecimiento o riesgo, buscando ese 20% que genera el 80% de los resultados. Después, aplica Parkinson: tres bloques de 45 minutos con entregables mínimos claros. Y dentro de cada bloque usa Pomodoro: 25 minutos de foco, 5 de descanso y 15 para cerrar y enviar. Así, no solo vas a avanzar rápido, sino en la dirección correcta.El episodio narra ejemplos y pasos prácticos para empezar ya: atajos de teclado, duplicar contenidos en tus herramientas y plantillas para propuestas o respuestas rápidas. Un caso real, Marcos, demuestra que adaptar la mañana a tres bloques PPP y entregar diariamente puede subir la rentabilidad sin perder foco. También hay señales de progreso y una microregla conductual para evitar fugas de atención: no abrir correo ni chat hasta terminar el primer bloque. ¿Te gustaría probarlo hoy? Únete al Club de Emprendedores Triunfers para rodearte de personas que ya lo aplican, con coworking online, cursos y recursos; prueba gratis en triunfers.com.Conviértete en un seguidor de este podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/productividad-maxima--5279700/support.Newsletter Marketing Radical: https://marketingradical.substack.com/welcomeNewsletter Negocios con IA: https://negociosconia.substack.com/welcomeMis Libros: https://borjagiron.com/librosSysteme Gratis: https://borjagiron.com/systemeSysteme 30% dto: https://borjagiron.com/systeme30Manychat Gratis: https://borjagiron.com/manychatMetricool 30 días Gratis Plan Premium (Usa cupón BORJA30): https://borjagiron.com/metricoolNoticias Redes Sociales: https://redessocialeshoy.comNoticias IA: https://inteligenciaartificialhoy.comClub: https://triunfers.com

En este episodio se revela cómo la Matriz de Eisenhower puede ayudarte a decidir como un general: divide tus tareas en cuatro cuadrantes y, sobre todo, entiende que no todo lo que es urgente es importante. El giro clave es que el crecimiento real suele estar en el cuadrante 2: lo importante pero no urgente, donde nacen la estrategia, las alianzas y mejoras que impulsan tu negocio. Para potenciarlas, se incorporan dos palancas: la ley de Pareto (el 20% de las tareas genera el 80% de los resultados) y la ley de Parkinson (las tareas ocupan exactamente el tiempo que les das). Con este marco, ya tienes un plan práctico para empezar a sacar trueno a tu agenda, no solo a apagar fuegos.El ejemplo de Marta, diseñadora freelance, ilustra lo que puede cambiar en semanas: bloquear las mañanas para lo importante no urgente y externalizar el soporte por horas le duplicó la facturación y redujo su carga de trabajo dominical. Pasos simples: captura todas las tareas y asígnales I/U o N/NU, reserva dos bloques de 45 minutos para lo crucial, crea plantillas para lo urgente no importante y elimina lo que no mueve la aguja. Si quieres, puedes ampliar con una comunidad de emprendedores que ya aplica estas ideas y comenzar hoy mismo con un reto de diez minutos para dar el primer paso. ¿Te atreves a gobernar tu agenda en lugar de dejar que ella te gobierne?Conviértete en un seguidor de este podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/productividad-maxima--5279700/support.Newsletter Marketing Radical: https://marketingradical.substack.com/welcomeNewsletter Negocios con IA: https://negociosconia.substack.com/welcomeMis Libros: https://borjagiron.com/librosSysteme Gratis: https://borjagiron.com/systemeSysteme 30% dto: https://borjagiron.com/systeme30Manychat Gratis: https://borjagiron.com/manychatMetricool 30 días Gratis Plan Premium (Usa cupón BORJA30): https://borjagiron.com/metricoolNoticias Redes Sociales: https://redessocialeshoy.comNoticias IA: https://inteligenciaartificialhoy.comClub: https://triunfers.com

Oro för en ny finanskris får världens börser på fall och ett antal tunga rapportbesvikelser adderar ytterligare till nedgången på börsen idag.Med oss i Börslunch-studion har vi idag Anders Roslund, analytiker på Pareto och Mattias Isakson, chefstrateg på Swedbank som bjuder på sina bästa spaningar från rapportströmmen.  Dessutom tar vi tempen på den viktiga verkstadssektorn.

You've likely heard of Pareto's Principle or the 80/20 rule. Is there a way to achieve most of the benefits of crypto-agility with minimal effort? Palo Alto Networks has undoubtedly made its mark with firewalls and security detection and response offerings. We learn how they can also provide a rapid head start to PQC migration, covering everything from cryptographic inventory to creating wrappers for legacy app communications that need to remain secure against quantum computing threats. Even the latest version of their PAN-OS is PQC enabled. And you won't believe what they're seeing in network traffic: PQC used to hide hacking attacks? Join host Konstantinos Karagiannis for a wide-ranging chat with Rich Campagna from Palo Alto Networks where they cover practical ways to get your company ready for tomorrow.    For more information on Palo Alto Networks, visit https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/.   Visit Protiviti at www.protiviti.com/US-en/technology-consulting/quantum-computing-services  to learn more about how Protiviti is helping organizations get post-quantum ready.  Follow host Konstantinos Karagiannis on all socials: @KonstantHacker and follow Protiviti Technology on LinkedIn and X: @ProtivitiTech.             Questions and comments are welcome!  Theme song by David Schwartz, copyright 2021.  The views expressed by the participants of this program are their own and do not represent the views of, nor are they endorsed by, Protiviti Inc., The Post-Quantum World, or their respective officers, directors, employees, agents, representatives, shareholders, or subsidiaries.  None of the content should be considered investment advice, as an offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or as an endorsement of any company, security, fund, or other securities or non-securities offering. Thanks for listening to this podcast. Protiviti Inc. is an equal opportunity employer, including minorities, females, people with disabilities, and veterans.  

Vous êtes parent et vous cherchez des astuces pour gagner du temps en post-partum ? Entre la charge mentale, les nuits courtes et l'organisation du quotidien, il est facile de se sentir débordé. Pourtant, il existe des méthodes simples pour prioriser vos tâches et retrouver de la sérénité : la matrice Eisenhower et la loi de Pareto, aussi appelée la règle des 80/20.Dans cet épisode, on répond à vos questions :- Comment s'organiser après l'accouchement sans s'épuiser ?- Quelles tâches déléguer pour gagner une heure par jour ?- Peut-on vraiment appliquer la loi de Pareto à la vie de parent ?On explore aussi :- La matrice Eisenhower, un outil pour distinguer l'urgent de l'important et éviter de se noyer dans les détails.- Des exemples concrets pour appliquer ces méthodes au quotidien : repas, ménage, gestion du stress.- Un défi simple pour identifier une tâche à arrêter dès aujourd'hui.Parce que le post-partum est déjà assez intense, autant le vivre sans culpabilité et avec plus de temps pour soi.Le défi de la semaine : identifiez une tâche à arrêter ou déléguer, et partagez-la en commentaire !A écouter en couple, pour ouvrir la discussion

In this episode, Dan and Mason break down what it really takes to thrive in today's land market — one that rewards skill, patience, and systems more than ever before. Gone are the days when anyone could throw a mailer and make a deal. What's left are the operators who understand how to outlast the market by mastering the fundamentals of direct-to-seller marketing, building credibility, and turning conversations into conversions.You'll hear how the best in the business are refining every lever — from mailer copy to data, from sales scripts to online reputation — to create a repeatable pipeline that produces real, qualified sellers. Our guests reveal how handwritten mailers still outperform at scale, why persistence with the same prospects builds trust, and how pairing outbound tactics with a strong digital presence turns cold leads into inbound calls.They also share the psychology behind why experienced investors sell below market value, the compounding value of time in the market, and why the Pareto principle still defines who survives each market cycle. From bank relationships and credit strategies to managing seller expectations and reading local markets, this conversation pulls back the curtain on what the most consistent land operators are really doing differently.Tune in to learn how to build a resilient, reputation-driven land business that compounds over time — one deal, one seller, and one market at a time.===Key Topics:-Direct to seller marketing strategies-Building strong online presence-Effective handwritten mailer campaigns-Cold calling and lead follow-up systems-Long-term market selection and persistence===

Work with Jordan personally at ⁠⁠www.ecommerceos.co⁠⁠Work with social commerce club at ⁠⁠www.socialcommerceclub.com⁠⁠Get 27 strategies in 27 days at ⁠⁠https://socialcommerceclub.com/pages/27-strategies⁠⁠Join Tiktok shop elites mastermind at ⁠⁠https://www.skool.com/tiktokshopelite/aboutUnlock the power of TikTok Shop as your ultimate top-of-funnel engine. In this video, Jordan West reveals the proven system his agency uses to turn TikTok Shop into a content machine that fuels Meta ads, Amazon, DTC, and retail growth. Learn how to harvest winning creator content, whitelist it, scale it, and syndicate it everywhere—so you never run out of high-performing ads again.Whether you're running a DTC brand or managing enterprise-level campaigns, this strategy will help you stop guessing which ads will work and start scaling with precision.

Are you drowning in “to-dos” that don't actually move the needle? In this episode, Alex Greenwood breaks down how the 80/20 rule—Pareto's Principle—can rescue PR pros from busywork hell. Learn why most press releases, vanity rankings, and ribbon cuttings belong in the bottom 80%, and how to focus on the few efforts that truly build trust, awareness, and credibility.

Bienvenido al podcast Productividad Máxima. Hoy traigo una estrategia de productividad sobre La Hora Pareto: sesenta minutos para el veinte por ciento que mueve el ochenta por ciento.La idea es directa y muy potente. Si eliges de antemano una sola acción que produzca la mayoría del impacto en tu negocio y le das un recipiente claro de sesenta minutos, activas la Ley de Pareto y domas la Ley de Parkinson al mismo tiempo. Es como usar una lupa con sol: la luz siempre estuvo ahí, pero solo quema cuando la concentras en un punto.Te cuento una historia. Diego tiene un estudio de diseño. Trabajaba muchas horas, pero su facturación no subía. Su día eran correos, revisiones y pequeñas tareas que parecían urgentes. Probamos La Hora Pareto durante una semana. Cada mañana, al abrir el portátil, sesenta minutos para un único objetivo de resultado, no de actividad. El primer día fue enviar dos propuestas firmables. El segundo, publicar la versión uno de su página de servicios. El tercero, llamar a tres clientes antiguos con una oferta clara. ¿Qué pasó? El día uno cerró una reunión nueva. El tercer día recuperó a un cliente que llevaba meses sin comprar. Y, sobre todo, dejó de terminar la jornada con la sensación de “he hecho mucho, pero no avancé”. Empezó a ver entregas, no solo movimiento.Sé que suena simple, y lo es, pero la clave está en cómo lo ejecutas. Primero, eliges tu aguja principal del día. Pregúntate: si solo pudiera terminar una cosa hoy que mejorara ingresos, retención o producto, ¿cuál sería? Segundo, conviertes esa cosa en un resultado visible con verbo de entrega. En lugar de “trabajar en propuestas”, es “enviar dos propuestas firmables”. En lugar de “mejorar web”, es “publicar página de servicios versión uno”. Tercero, blindas el bloque. Cierra notificaciones, avisa a tu equipo, y deja a mano una hoja de aparcamiento para anotar cualquier idea o interrupción y seguir. Cuarto, divide tu hora en cuarenta minutos de creación o decisión, quince de empaquetado y cinco de cierre. Creación es producir lo esencial. Empaquetado es enviar, publicar o programar. Cierre es anotar el siguiente paso y registrar un aprendizaje.Piensa en tu día como una pista de aeropuerto. Si no reservas la franja para el avión más grande, los aviones pequeños llenan todo el espacio y el grande no aterriza. La Hora Pareto es esa franja reservada para lo importante de verdad. La diferencia entre estar ocupado y progresar.Este episodio está patrocinado por Systeme, la herramienta de marketing todo en uno gratuita con la que puedes crear tu web, blog, landing page y tienda online, crear automatizaciones y embudos de venta, realizar tus campañas de email marketing, vender cursos online, añadir pagos online e incluso crear webinars automatizados. Puedes empezar a usar Systeme gratis entrando en borjagiron.com/systeme o desde el link de la descripción. Y ahora continuamos con el episodio.Para que te salga redondo desde hoy, te dejo un guion sencillo. Al arrancar, escribe una sola frase: “Al terminar esta hora habré…” y completa con un verbo de entrega, como enviar, publicar, firmar, decidir, programar o llamar. Prepara lo imprescindible antes de empezar, como un chef con su mise en place: abre solo la herramienta necesaria, ten la plantilla y los datos a mano, y cierra todo lo demás. Inicia el temporizador de sesenta minutos y repítete una regla de oro: versión uno hoy, versión mejorada mañana. Cuando te atasques, reduce el objetivo a la pieza más pequeña que desbloquea el resto, por ejemplo escribir solo el titular y la llamada a la acción. En los últimos cinco minutos, entrega, registra el estado y define el siguiente paso concreto. Así mañana no empezarás con una página en blanco, sino con una pista clara.Una similitud más para que se quede grabado. Imagina que tu negocio es un jardín. Las pequeñas tareas son hojas secas; parece que hay mucho por hacer, pero no cambia la vida del jardín. La Hora Pareto es regar las raíces. No hace ruido, no luce en redes sociales, pero sostiene todo. Riegas primero, barres después. Si inviertes el orden, el jardín se ve bonito un rato, pero se seca.Si dudas por dónde empezar, aquí tienes ideas habituales para esa hora de alto impacto. En ventas, enviar tres propuestas reales o hacer cinco seguimientos con mensaje personalizado. En producto, publicar la versión uno de una nueva página o grabar un vídeo corto de onboarding. En retención, llamar a tres clientes para entender una fricción y resolver una hoy. En contenido, escribir y programar un post con una llamada a la acción clara. En finanzas, revisar una métrica clave y tomar una decisión, por ejemplo subir precios, eliminar una oferta o duplicar la que mejor funciona. Hazlo cinco días seguidos y evalúa. Si no notas más claridad y mejores resultados, cambia la pregunta con la que eliges tu aguja, no abandones la estrategia.Y ahora, si además de ejecutar con foco quieres decidir mejor, te recomiendo el Club de Emprendedores Triunfers, al que puedes unirte desde Triunfers.com. Deja de tomar malas decisiones en tu negocio. Club Privado de Emprendedores que nos ayudamos a solucionar dudas y problemas para tomar mejores decisiones de negocio. Una mala decisión puede hundir tu negocio, además de hacerte perder mucho tiempo y dinero. Sin olvidar la frustración, ansiedad, tener que cerrar tu negocio y abandonar tu sueño de emprender con libertad. Deja de tomar malas decisiones. Antes de hacer algo pregunta a los expertos del club. Dentro tendrás criterio, acompañamiento y respuestas prácticas para elegir bien a la primera y avanzar con seguridad. Únete hoy desde Triunfers.com.Hasta aquí el episodio de hoy. Gracias por compartirlo con esa persona que lo pueda necesitar. Te espero mañana en el próximo episodio. Un fuerte abrazo.Conviértete en un seguidor de este podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/productividad-maxima--5279700/support.Newsletter Marketing Radical: https://marketingradical.substack.com/welcomeNewsletter Negocios con IA: https://negociosconia.substack.com/welcomeMis Libros: https://borjagiron.com/librosSysteme Gratis: https://borjagiron.com/systemeSysteme 30% dto: https://borjagiron.com/systeme30Manychat Gratis: https://borjagiron.com/manychatMetricool 30 días Gratis Plan Premium (Usa cupón BORJA30): https://borjagiron.com/metricoolNoticias Redes Sociales: https://redessocialeshoy.comNoticias IA: https://inteligenciaartificialhoy.comClub: https://triunfers.com

In this episode of the Always On Podcast, host Duncan McPherson sits down with Jeff Ambrose, a Pareto certified business consultant and innovative recruiter, to discuss the “advisor flight plan.” This strategic framework is designed to help financial advisors transition smoothly to new environments. Jeff shares his expertise on the evolving financial landscape and the … Continue reading Navigating Transitions: The Advisor Flight Plan with Jeff Ambrose (Ep. 84) →

https://www.astralcodexten.com/p/sources-say-bay-area-house-party [previously in series: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7] Something is off about this Bay Area House Party. There are . . . women. “I've never seen a gender balance like this in the Bay Area,” you tell your host Chris. “Is this one of those fabled ratio parties?” “No - have you heard of curtfishing? It's the new male dating trend. You say in your Bumble profile that you're a member of the Dissident Right who often attends parties with Curtis Yarvin. Then female journos ask you out in the hopes that you'll bring them along and they can turn it into an article.” “What happens when they realize Curtis Yarvin isn't at the party?” “Oh, everyone pools their money and hires someone to pretend to be Curtis. You can just do things. Today it's Ramchandra.” You follow his gaze, and there is Ramchandra, hair greased back, wearing a leather jacket, surrounded by a crowd of young women. “When I say I'm against furries,” he's explaining, staccato, at 120 wpm, “I mean the sort of captured furries you get under the post-Warren-G-Harding liberal order, the ones getting the fat checks from the Armenians at Harvard and the Department of Energy. I love real furries, the kind you would have found in 1920s New Mexico eating crocodile steaks with Baron von Ungern-Sternberg! Some of my best friends are furries, as de Broglie-Bohm and my sainted mother used to say! Just watch out for the Kikuyu, that's my advice! Hahahahahaha!” Some of the women are taking notes. “But enough about me. When I was seventeen, I spent seven weeks in Bensonhurst - that's in the Rotten Apple, in case you can't tell your Nepalis from your Neapolitans. A dear uncle of mine, after whom I was named…” “Ramchandra is pretty good,” you admit. “Still, if it were me I would have gone with a white guy.” “It's fine,” says Chris. “Curtis describes himself as a mischling, and none of the journos know what that means.” Ramchandra is still talking. “Of course, strawberries have only been strawberries since after the Kronstadt Rebellion. Before that, strawberries were just pears. You had to get them hand-painted red by Gypsies, if you can believe that. Gypsies! So if you hear someone from west of Pennsylvania Avenue mention ‘strawberries', that's what we in the business call il significanto.” “I admit he has talent,“ you say. “But this curtfishing thing - surely at some point your date realizes that you're not actually a high-status yet problematic bad boy who can further her career just by existing, and then she ghosts you, right?” “That's every date in San Francisco. But when you curtfish, sometimes she comps your meal from her expense account. It's a strict Pareto improvement!” After some thought, you agree this is a great strategy with no downsides, maybe the biggest innovation in dating since the invention of alcohol. Having failed to bring your own journo to the party, you look for one who seems unattached. You catch the eye of a blonde woman who introduces herself as Gabrielle, and you try to give her the least autistic “Hello” of which you are capable.

Key Highlights from the Episode:0:00 – Introduction3:21 – Professional scarcity: why focusing on fewer clients creates greater impact5:12 – Shifting from book of business to real business7:10 – Why client experience outweighs investment performance9:15 – The law of familiarity and loyalty fatigue14:23 – How to reset client relationships during a transition18:16 – Fee worthiness and setting rules of engagement25:03 – How processes and intellectual property drive valuation29:12 – Depersonalizing your practice to build enterprise value31:40 – The role of AI in practice management34:17 – Balancing high-tech with high-touch in client relationships40:23 – Breaking the status quo to unlock potentialResources:Elite Consulting Partners | Financial Advisor Transitions: https://eliteconsultingpartners.com  Elite Marketing Concepts | Marketing Services for Financial Advisors: https://elitemarketingconcepts.com  Elite Advisor Successions | Advisor Mergers and Acquisitions: https://eliteadvisorsuccessions.com  JEDI Database Solutions | Data Intelligence for Advisors: https://jedidatabasesolutions.com  Connect with Duncan Macpherson on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/duncanmacpherson  Visit Pareto Systems: https://www.paretosystems.com  Download Duncan's AI Whitepaper: https://paretosystems.com/ai-strategies-for-financial-professionals.html  Listen to more Advisor Talk episodes: https://eliteconsultingpartners.com/podcasts/  Follow us on LinkedIn: https://linkedin.com/company/eliteconsultingpartners   

Tom Drummond, Managing Partner at Heavybit, joins the show to break down what it takes to build and scale AI “picks and shovels” companies for the enterprise. We dive into the realities of selling into one of the hardest markets to reach, why differentiation matters more than ever, and how startups can wedge their way into massive opportunities despite fierce competition.Key Takeaways• Enterprise attention is more competitive than ever—breaking through requires clarity and category creation.• Cold email and traditional outbound are saturated—startups must iterate quickly on channels and messaging.• Landing enterprise deals often starts with developers and end users, not CIOs—grassroots adoption is powerful.• Narrow wedges matter—solve one painful, high-value problem better than anyone else, then expand.• Timing the industry cycle is critical—knowing when markets fragment and when they consolidate can define outcomes.Timestamped Highlights02:03 — Why enterprise attention has never been harder to win04:55 — Differentiation in a sea of lookalike AI infrastructure startups07:34 — Cold email vs content, billboards, and unconventional channels08:35 — The Pareto rule of enterprise revenue and why developer adoption is key11:47 — Competing with big tech incumbents: the power of the narrow wedge21:03 — Where the market is headed: cycles of expansion, contraction, and consolidationA line that stuck“You don't win by being another tool—you win by defining the category everyone else has to fit into.”Call to ActionIf you enjoyed this conversation, share it with a founder or tech leader who's navigating the enterprise market. Make sure to follow the show for more unfiltered conversations with people shaping the future of software and AI.

My fellow pro-growth/progress/abundance Up Wingers,Artificial intelligence may prove to be one of the most transformative technologies in history, but like any tool, its immense power for good comes with a unique array of risks, both large and small.Today on Faster, Please! — The Podcast, I chat with Miles Brundage about extracting the most out of AI's potential while mitigating harms. We discuss the evolving expectations for AI development and how to reconcile with the technology's most daunting challenges.Brundage is an AI policy researcher. He is a non-resident fellow at the Institute for Progress, and formerly held a number of senior roles at OpenAI. He is also the author of his own Substack.In This Episode* Setting expectations (1:18)* Maximizing the benefits (7:21)* Recognizing the risks (13:23)* Pacing true progress (19:04)* Considering national security (21:39)* Grounds for optimism and pessimism (27:15)Below is a lightly edited transcript of our conversation. Setting expectations (1:18)It seems to me like there are multiple vibe shifts happening at different cadences and in different directions.Pethokoukis: Earlier this year I was moderating a discussion between an economist here at AEI and a CEO of a leading AI company, and when I asked each of them how AI might impact our lives, our economists said, ‘Well, I could imagine, for instance, a doctor's productivity increasing because AI could accurately and deeply translate and transcribe an appointment with a patient in a way that's far better than what's currently available.” So that was his scenario. And then I asked the same question of the AI company CEO, who said, by contrast, “Well, I think within a decade, all human death will be optional thanks to AI-driven medical advances.” On that rather broad spectrum — more efficient doctor appointments and immortality — how do you see the potential of this technology?Brundage: It's a good question. I don't think those are necessarily mutually exclusive. I think, in general, AI can both augment productivity and substitute for human labor, and the ratio of those things is kind of hard to predict and might be very policy dependent and social-norm dependent. What I will say is that, in general, it seems to me like the pace of progress is very fast and so both augmentation and substitutions seem to be picking up steam.It's kind of interesting watching the debate between AI researchers and economists, and I have a colleague who has said that the AI researchers sometimes underestimate the practical challenges in deployment at scale. Conversely, the economists sometimes underestimate just how quickly the technology is advancing. I think there's maybe some happy middle to be found, or perhaps one of the more extreme perspectives is true. But personally, I am not an economist, I can't really speak to all of the details of substitution, and augmentation, and all the policy variables here, but what I will say is that at least the technical potential for very significant amounts of augmentation of human labor, as well as substitution for human labor, seem pretty likely on even well less than 10 years — but certainly within 10 years things will change a lot.It seems to me that the vibe has shifted a bit. When I talk to people from the Bay Area and I give them the Washington or Wall Street economist view, to them I sound unbelievably gloomy and cautious. But it seems the vibe has shifted, at least recently, to where a lot of people think that major advancements like superintelligence are further out than they previously thought — like we should be viewing AI as an important technology, but more like what we've seen before with the Internet and the PC.It's hard for me to comment. It seems to me like there are multiple vibe shifts happening at different cadences and in different directions. It seems like several years ago there was more of a consensus that what people today would call AGI was decades away or more, and it does seem like that kind of timeframe has shifted closer to the present. There there's still debate between the “next few years” crowd versus the “more like 10 years” crowd. But that is a much narrower range than we saw several years ago when there was a wider range of expert opinions. People who used to be seen as on one end of the spectrum, for example, Gary Marcus and François Chollet who were seen as kind of the skeptics of AI progress, even they now are saying, “Oh, it's like maybe 10 years or so, maybe five years for very high levels of capability.” So I think there's been some compression in that respect. That's one thing that's going on.There's also a way in which people are starting to think less abstractly and more concretely about the applications of AI and seeing it less as this kind of mysterious thing that might happen suddenly and thinking of it more as incremental, more as something that requires some work to apply in various parts of the economy that there's some friction associated with.Both of these aren't inconsistent, they're just kind of different vibe shifts that are happening. So getting back to the question of is this just a normal technology, I would say that, at the very least, it does seem faster in some respects than some other technological changes that we've seen. So I think ChatGPT's adoption going from zero to double-digit percentages of use across many professions in the US and in a matter of high number of months, low number of years, is quite stark.Would you be surprised if, five years from now, we viewed AI as something much more important than just another incremental technological advance, something far more transformative than technologies that have come before?No, I wouldn't be surprised by that at all. If I understand your question correctly, my baseline expectation is that it will be seen as one of the most important technologies ever. I'm not sure that there's a standard consensus on how to rate the internet versus electricity, et cetera, but it does seem to me like it's of the same caliber of electricity in the sense of essentially converting one kind of energy into various kinds of useful economic work. Similarly, AI is converting various types of electricity into cognitive work, and I think that's a huge deal.Maximizing the benefits (7:21)There's also a lot of value being left on the table in terms of finding new ways to exploit the upsides and accelerate particularly beneficial applications.However you want to define society or the aspect of society that you focus on — government businesses, individuals — are we collectively doing what we need to do to fully exploit the upsides of this technology over the next half-decade to decade, as well as minimizing potential downsides?I think we are not, and this is something that I sometimes find frustrating about the way that the debate plays out is that there's sometimes this zero-sum mentality of doomers versus boomers — a term that Karen Hao uses — and this idea that there's this inherent tension between mitigating the risks and maximizing the benefits, and there are some tensions, but I don't think that we are on the Pareto frontier, so to speak, of those issues.Right now, I think there's a lot of value being left on the table in terms of fairly low-cost risk mitigations. There's also a lot of value being left on the table in terms of finding new ways to exploit the upsides and accelerate particularly beneficial applications. I'll give just one example, because I write a lot about the risk, but I also am very interested in maximizing the upside. So I'll just give one example: Protecting critical infrastructure and improving the cybersecurity of various parts of critical infrastructure in the US. Hospitals, for example, get attacked with ransomware all the time, and this causes real harm to patients because machines get bricked, essentially, and they have one or two people on the IT team, and they're kind of overwhelmed by these, not even always that sophisticated, but perhaps more-sophisticated hackers. That's a huge problem. It matters for national security in addition to patients' lives, and it matters for national security in the sense that this is something that China and Russia and others could hold at risk in the context of a war. They could threaten this critical infrastructure as part of a bargaining strategy.And I don't think that there's that much interest in helping hospitals have a better automated cybersecurity engineer helper among the Big Tech companies — because there aren't that many hospital administrators. . . I'm not sure if it would meet the technical definition of market failure, but it's at least a national security failure in that it's a kind of fragmented market. There's a water plant here, a hospital administrator there.I recently put out a report with the Institute for Progress arguing that philanthropists and government could put some additional gasoline in the tank of cybersecurity by incentivizing innovation that specifically helps these under-resourced defenders more so than the usual customers of cybersecurity companies like Fortune 500 companies.I'm confident that companies and entrepreneurs will figure out how to extract value from AI and create new products and new services, barring any regulatory slowdowns. But since you mentioned low-hanging fruit, what are some examples of that?I would say that transparency is one of the areas where a lot of AI policy experts seem to be in pretty strong agreement. Obviously there is still some debate and disagreement about the details of what should be required, but just to give you some illustration, it is typical for the leading AI companies, sometimes called frontier AI companies, to put out some kind of documentation about the safety steps that they've taken. It's typical for them to say, here's our safety strategy and here's some evidence that we're following this strategy. This includes things like assessing whether their systems can be used for cyber-attacks, and assessing whether they could be used to create biological weapons, or assessing the extent to which they make up facts and make mistakes, but state them very confidently in a way that could pose risks to users of the technology.That tends to be totally voluntary, and there started to be some momentum as a result of various voluntary commitments that were made in recent years, but as the technology gets more high-stakes, and there's more cutthroat competition, and there's maybe more lawsuits where companies might be tempted to retreat a bit in terms of the information that they share, I think that things could kind of backslide, and at the very least not advance as far as I would like from the perspective of making sure that there's sharing of lessons learned from one company to another, as well as making sure that investors and users of the technology can make informed decisions about, okay, do I purchase the services of OpenAI, or Google, or Anthropic, and making these informed decisions, making informed capital investment seems to require transparency to some degree.This is something that is actively being debated in a few contexts. For example, in California there's a bill that has that and a few other things called SB-53. But in general, we're at a bit of a fork in the road in terms of both how certain regulations will be implemented such as in the EU. Is it going to become actually an adaptive, nimble approach to risk mitigation or is it going to become a compliance checklist that just kind of makes big four accounting firms richer? So there are questions then there are just “does the law pass or not?” kind of questions here.Recognizing the risks (13:23). . . I'm sure there'll be some things that we look back on and say it's not ideal, but in my opinion, it's better to do something that is as informed as we can do, because it does seem like there are these kind of market failures and incentive problems that are going to arise if we do nothing . . .In my probably overly simplistic way of looking at it, I think of two buckets and you have issues like, are these things biased? Are they giving misinformation? Are they interacting with young people in a way that's bad for their mental health? And I feel like we have a lot of rules and we have a huge legal system for liability that can probably handle those.Then, in the other bucket, are what may, for the moment, be science-fictional kinds of existential risks, whether it's machines taking over or just being able to give humans the ability to do very bad things in a way we couldn't before. Within that second bucket, I think, it sort of needs to be flexible. Right now, I'm pretty happy with voluntary standards, and market discipline, and maybe the government creating some benchmarks, but I can imagine the technology advancing to where the voluntary aspect seems less viable and there might need to be actual mandates about transparency, or testing, or red teaming, or whatever you want to call it.I think that's a reasonable distinction, in the sense that there are risks at different scales, there are some that are kind of these large-scale catastrophic risks and might have lower likelihood but higher magnitude of impact. And then there are things that are, I would say, literally happening millions of times a day like ChatGPT making up citations to articles that don't exist, or Claud saying that it fixed your code but actually it didn't fix the code and the user's too lazy to notice, and so forth.So there are these different kinds of risks. I personally don't make a super strong distinction between them in terms of different time horizons, precisely because I think things are going so quickly. I think science fiction is becoming science fact very much sooner than many people expected. But in any case, I think that similar logic around, let's make sure that there's transparency even if we don't know exactly what the right risk thresholds are, and we want to allow a fair degree of flexibility and what measures companies take.It seems good that they share what they're doing and, in my opinion, ideally go another step further and allow third parties to audit their practices and make sure that if they say, “Well, we did a rigorous test for hallucination or something like that,” that that's actually true. And so that's what I would like to see for both what you might call the mundane and the more science fiction risks. But again, I think it's kind of hard to say how things will play out, and different people have different perspectives on these things. I happen to be on the more aggressive end of the spectrumI am worried about the spread of the apocalyptic, high-risk AI narrative that we heard so much about when ChatGPT first rolled out. That seems to have quieted, but I worry about it ramping up again and stifling innovation in an attempt to reduce risk.These are very fair concerns, and I will say that there are lots of bills and laws out there that have, in fact, slowed down innovation and certain contexts. The EU, I think, has gone too far in some areas around social media platforms. I do think at least some of the state bills that have been floated would lead to a lot of red tape and burdens to small businesses. I personally think this is avoidable.There are going to be mistakes. I don't want to be misleading about how high quality policymakers' understanding of some of these issues are. There will be mistakes, even in cases where, for example, in California there was a kind of blue ribbon commission of AI experts producing a report over several months, and then that directly informing legislation, and a lot of industry back and forth and negotiation over the details. I would say that's probably the high water mark, SB-53, of fairly stakeholder/expert-informed legislation. Even there, I'm sure there'll be some things that we look back on and say it's not ideal, but in my opinion, it's better to do something that is as informed as we can do, because it does seem like there are these kind of market failures and incentive problems that are going to arise if we do nothing, such as companies retrenching and holding back information that makes it hard for the field as a whole to tackle these issues.I'll just make one more point, which is adapting to the compliance capability of different companies: How rich are they? How expensive are the models they're training, I think is a key factor in the legislation that I tend to be more sympathetic to. So just to make a contrast, there's a bill in Colorado that was kind of one size fits all, regulate all the kind of algorithms, and that, I think, is very burdensome to small businesses. I think something like SB-53 where it says, okay, if you can afford to train an AI system for a $100 million, you can probably afford to put out a dozen pages about your safety and security practices.Pacing true progress (19:04). . . some people . . . kind of wanted to say, “Well, things are slowing down.” But in my opinion, if you look at more objective measures of progress . . . there's quite rapid progress happening still.Hopefully Grok did not create this tweet of yours, but if it did, well, there we go. You won't have to answer it, but I just want to understand what you meant by it: “A lot of AI safety people really, really want to find evidence that we have a lot of time for AGI.” What does that mean?What I was trying to get at is that — and I guess this is not necessarily just AI safety people, but I sometimes kind of try to poke at people in my social network who I'm often on the same side of, but also try to be a friendly critic to, and that includes people who are working on AI safety. I think there's a common tendency to kind of grasp at what I would consider straws when reading papers and interpreting product launches in a way that kind of suggests, well, we've hit a wall, AI is slowing down, this was a flop, who cares?I'm doing my kind of maybe uncharitable psychoanalysis. What I was getting at is that I think one reason why some people might be tempted to do that is that it makes things seem easier and less scary: “Well, we don't have to worry about really powerful AI enabled cyber-attacks for another five years, or biological weapons for another two years, or whatever.” Maybe, maybe not.I think the specific example that sparked that was GPT-5 where there were a lot of people who, in my opinion, were reading the tea leaves in a particular way and missing important parts of the context. For example, at GPT-5 wasn't a much larger or more expensive-to-train model than GPT-4, which may be surprising by the name. And I think OpenAI did kind of screw up the naming and gave people the wrong impression, but from my perspective, there was nothing particularly surprising, but to some people it was kind of a flop that they kind of wanted to say, “Well, things are slowing down.” But in my opinion, if you look at more objective measures of progress like scores on math, and coding, and the reduction in the rate of hallucinations, and solving chemistry and biology problems, and designing new chips, and so forth, there's quite rapid progress happening still.Considering national security (21:39)I want to avoid a scenario like the Cuban Missile Crisis or ways in which that could have been much worse than the actual Cuban Missile Crisis happening as a result of AI and AGI.I'm not sure if you're familiar with some of the work being done by former Google CEO Eric Schmidt, who's been doing a lot of work on national security and AI, and his work, it doesn't use the word AGI, but it talks about AI certainly smart enough to be able to have certain capabilities which our national security establishment should be aware of, should be planning, and those capabilities, I think to most people, would seem sort of science fictional: being able to launch incredibly sophisticated cyber-attacks, or be able to improve itself, or be able to create some other sort of capabilities. And from that, I'm like, whether or not you think that's possible, to me, the odds of that being possible are not zero, and if they're not zero, some bit of the bandwidth of the Pentagon should be thinking about that. I mean, is that sensible?Yeah, it's totally sensible. I'm not going to argue with you there. In fact, I've done some collaboration with the Rand Corporation, which has a pretty heavy investment in what they call the geopolitics of AGI and kind of studying what are the scenarios, including AI and AGI being used to produce “wonder weapons” and super-weapons of some kind.Basically, I think this is super important and in fact, I have a paper coming out that was in collaboration with some folks there pretty soon. I won't spoil all the details, but if you search “Miles Brundage US China,” you'll see some things that I've discussed there. And basically my perspective is we need to strike a balance between competing vigorously on the commercial side with countries like China and Russia on AI — more so China, Russia is less of a threat on the commercial side, at least — and also making sure that we're fielding national security applications of AI in a responsible way, but also recognizing that there are these ways in which things could spiral out of control in a scenario with totally unbridled competition. I want to avoid a scenario like the Cuban Missile Crisis or ways in which that could have been much worse than the actual Cuban Missile Crisis happening as a result of AI and AGI.If you think that, again, the odds are not zero that a technology which is fast-evolving, that we have no previous experience with because it's fast-evolving, could create the kinds of doomsday scenarios that there's new books out about, people are talking about. And so if you think, okay, not a zero percent chance that could happen, but it is kind of a zero percent chance that we're going to stop AI, smash the GPUs, as someone who cares about policy, are you just hoping for the best, or are the kinds of things we've already talked about — transparency, testing, maybe that testing becoming mandatory at some point — is that enough?It's hard to say what's enough, and I agree that . . . I don't know if I give it zero, maybe if there's some major pandemic caused by AI and then Xi Jinping and Trump get together and say, okay, this is getting out of control, maybe things could change. But yeah, it does seem like continued investment and a large-scale deployment of AI is the most likely scenario.Generally, the way that I see this playing out is that there are kind of three pillars of a solution. There's kind of some degree of safety and security standards. Maybe we won't agree on everything, but we should at least be able to agree that you don't want to lose control of your AI system, you don't want it to get stolen, you don't want a $10 billion AI system to be stolen by a $10 million-scale hacking effort. So I think there are sensible standards you can come up with around safety and security. I think you can have evidence produced or required that companies are following these things. That includes transparency.It also includes, I would say, third-party auditing where there's kind of third parties checking the claims and making sure that these standards are being followed, and then you need some incentives to actually participate in this regime and follow it. And I think the incentives part is tricky, particularly at an international scale. What incentive does China have to play ball other than obviously they don't want to have their AI kill them or overthrow their government or whatever? So where exactly are the interests aligned or not? Is there some kind of system of export control policies or sanctions or something that would drive compliance or is there some other approach? I think that's the tricky part, but to me, those are kind of the rough outlines of a solution. Maybe that's enough, but I think right now it's not even really clear what the rough rules of the road are, who's playing by the rules, and we're relying a lot on goodwill and voluntary reporting. I think we could do better, but is that enough? That's harder to say.Grounds for optimism and pessimism (27:15). . . it seems to me like there is at least some room for learning from experience . . . So in that sense, I'm more optimistic. . . I would say, in another respect, I'm maybe more pessimistic in that I am seeing value being left on the table.Did your experience at OpenAI make you more or make you more optimistic or worried that, when we look back 10 years from now, that AI will have, overall on net, made the world a better place?I am sorry to not give you a simpler answer here, and maybe think I should sit on this one and come up with a kind of clearer, more optimistic or more pessimistic answer, but I'll give you kind of two updates in different directions, and I think they're not totally inconsistent.I would say that I have gotten more optimistic about the solvability of the problem in the following sense. I think that things were very fuzzy five, 10 years ago, and when I joined OpenAI almost seven years now ago now, there was a lot of concern that it could kind of come about suddenly — that one day you don't have AI, the next day you have AGI, and then on the third day you have artificial superintelligence and so forth.But we don't live to see the fourth day.Exactly, and so it seems more gradual to me now, and I think that is a good thing. It also means that — and this is where I differ from some of the more extreme voices in terms of shutting it all down — it seems to me like there is at least some room for learning from experience, iterating, kind of taking the lessons from GPT-5 and translating them into GPT-6, rather than it being something that we have to get 100 percent right on the first shot and there being no room for error. So in that sense, I'm more optimistic.I would say, in another respect, I'm maybe more pessimistic in that I am seeing value being left on the table. It seems to me like, as I said, we're not on the Pareto frontier. It seems like there are pretty straightforward things that could be done for a very small fraction of, say, the US federal budget, or very small fraction of billionaires' personal philanthropy or whatever. That in my opinion, would dramatically reduce the likelihood of an AI-enabled pandemic or various other issues, and would dramatically increase the benefits of AI.It's been a bit sad to continuously see those opportunities being neglected. I hope that as AI becomes more of a salient issue to more people and people start to appreciate, okay, this is a real thing, the benefits are real, the risks are real, that there will be more of a kind of efficient policy market and people take those opportunities, but right now it seems pretty inefficient to me. That's where my pessimism comes from. It's not that it's unsolvable, it's just, okay, from a political economy and kind of public-choice perspective, are the policymakers going to make the right decisions?On sale everywhere The Conservative Futurist: How To Create the Sci-Fi World We Were PromisedMicro Reads Faster, Please! is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit fasterplease.substack.com/subscribe

Summary In this episode, Clayton Cuteri explores the concept of momentum in personal growth and spirituality, drawing on teachings from Jesus and the Pareto principle. He emphasizes the importance of focusing on positive thoughts and actions to create momentum in life and how this can lead to significant transformations. The conversation also touches on the interconnectedness of individuals in their spiritual journeys and the importance of supporting one another.Clayton's Social MediaLinkTree | TikTok | Instagram | Twitter (X) | YouTube | RumbleTimecodes00:00 - Intro01:04 - The Power of Momentum in Life03:51 - Understanding the Pareto Principle06:04 - Creating Positive Momentum12:00 - Transforming Your Life Through Focus15:40 - Supporting Each Other's Spiritual JourneysIntro/Outro Music Producer: Don KinIG: https://www.instagram.com/donkinmusic/Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/artist/44QKqKsd81oJEBKffwdFfPSuper grateful for this guy ^Send Clayton a text message!Support the showNEWSLETTER - SIGN UP HERE

What would you do if your company had just 90 days to survive? That's the reality turnaround expert Bill Canady has faced more than once. In this episode of the Business Leader Podcast, we speak with him to unpack the three drivers of business transformation: growth, fear and exit. Canady shows how focusing on profitability first, leveraging the Pareto 80/20 principle and taking tough but necessary decisions can set a business back on course.From restructuring teams to repricing products, his insights cut through complexity with actionable advice. Whether you're battling cash flow problems, stalled growth or preparing for a strategic exit, this conversation will help you reframe your challenges as opportunities. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this episode of The Conference Room, host Simon is joined by serial entrepreneur  Kasim Aslam.  Kasim shares his inspiring journey from humble beginnings in Albuquerque to building multiple seven and eight-figure businesses, including the top-ranked Google ad agency Solutions 8, which he sold in 2022. He discusses his entrepreneurial origin story, the challenges he faced, and how he cracked the code on hiring exceptional talent globally.  Kasim introduces his upcoming book Higher, a step-by-step framework for hiring top remote talent, and dives deep into why most businesses struggle to attract extraordinary employees and how to fix that. He also shares practical hiring strategies, including how to find, vet, and retain the best people worldwide, especially in emerging markets. This episode is a must-listen for entrepreneurs and business leaders looking to scale with high-impact talent.Key Moments:Introduction to  Kasim Aslam: Serial entrepreneur, author, and founder of Solutions 8, with multiple successful exitsCassim's entrepreneurial origin story: Growing up in poverty, early business lessons selling candy, and the impact of his upbringing.Overcoming adversity: From losing everything in the banking collapse to starting over with web work and building Solutions 8.Building and selling Solutions 8: Growing the largest dedicated Google ad agency and lessons learned from the exit.Post-exit ventures and passion for offshore staffing: How  Kasim builds multiple service businesses and his focus on empowering talent in emerging markets.The Higher book and hiring philosophy: Why treating people as commodities is wrong and the power of the Pareto (80/20) distribution in talent.Why most businesses repel top talent: Fear of competence, mediocrity, and the importance of paying more to attract exceptional employees.Global talent arbitrage: How hiring internationally can provide access to highly skilled, motivated workers at competitive rates.Practical hiring framework: Writing compelling job posts, using “fly traps” to filter candidates, paying for trial projects, and testing real job skills.Final tips and book launch: Top three hiring tips—be a place people want to work, have high expectations, and trust your team. How to get the Higher book and connect with Cassim.To learn more about  Kasim Aslam please visit her Linkedin ProfileTo learn more about  Pareto Talent please visit her websiteYOUR HOST - SIMON LADER    Simon Lader is the host of The Conference Room, Co-Founder of global executive search firm Salisi Human Capital, and lead generation consultancy Flow and Scale. Since 1997, Simon has helped cybersecurity vendors to build highly effective teams, and since 2022 he has helped people create consistent revenue through consistent lead generation.      Get to know more about Simon at:    Website: https://simonlader.com/  Twitter: https://twitter.com/simonlader  LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/headhuntersimonlader/    The Conference Room is available onSpotifyApple podcastsAmazon MusicIHeartRadio

The Pareto principle states that for many outcomes, roughly 80% of consequences come from 20% of causes. In other words, a small percentage of causes have an outsized effect. This concept is important to understand because it can help you identify which initiatives to prioritize so you can make the most impact.

Dr. Shannon Flumerfelt, Founder of Charactership Lean Consulting and Endowed Professor of Lean at Oakland University, joined host Jamie Flinchbaugh to discuss her systematic approach to coaching leaders through difficult situations and complex problem-solving challenges. Dr. Flumerfelt shared her framework for handling difficult coaching situations, which begins with understanding whether the challenge stems from external factors or internal issues. She explains that external problems—such as skill gaps or training needs—are often easier to address through coaching and mentoring. However, internal challenges require a deeper analysis using what she calls the "head, heart, and hands" approach: examining a person's knowledge, disposition, and actual capabilities. When faced with complex situations, Dr. Flumerfelt advocates for creating an Ishikawa diagram to break down all contributing factors. She emphasizes the power of co-creating these visual tools with clients, noting that self-reflection becomes most powerful when people can see their challenges mapped out concretely. This approach helps remove emotional drama from the situation and enables more logical, analytical thinking while still respecting people's feelings and perspectives. Regarding prioritization when multiple problems exist, she stresses that the approach must be organic and context-dependent, true to lean principles. She suggests several methods for determining where to start: ensuring strategic alignment with organizational goals through Hoshin Kanri planning, conducting quality function deployment analysis to understand customer requirements, or using Pareto analysis to tackle the most significant causes first. However, she cautions that sometimes the biggest problems are beyond an individual's scope of influence, requiring a more realistic assessment of what can be accomplished. Dr. Flumerfelt also recommends using interrelationship diagrams to identify which issues have the most connections to other problems, as addressing these can create the greatest ripple effect of positive change. The key is understanding your level of power, influence, and authority within the organization and working within those realistic boundaries. When discussing how to tap into people's intuition alongside analytical tools, she acknowledges that lean thinking often appears heavily engineering-focused and black-and-white. However, she emphasizes that successful lean implementation requires understanding the complete framework of lean thinking, not just selecting individual tools. She advocates for using personality assessments like Myers-Briggs to understand team members' strengths and whether they tend toward intuitive or logical approaches. She highlights the concept of social capital as a competitive advantage, referencing Michael Porter's work. She believes organizations drastically underutilize their human potential, comparing it to how individuals only use a small percentage of their brain capacity. When you multiply underutilized brains across an entire organization, the untapped potential becomes enormous. This perspective drives her approach to individualizing and customizing development for each person, recognizing that people aren't robots and have unique strengths and weaknesses that deserve respect. Throughout the conversation, the importance of visual management tools and moving beyond just thinking or journaling to drawing out and visualizing problems and solutions was emphasized. This structured approach helps transform messy, complex situations into manageable challenges that can be systematically addressed. For those interested in experiencing her approach firsthand, Dr. Flumerfelt offers consulting services through Charactership Lean Consulting and teaches in Oakland University's graduate Lean Leadership program—a rare opportunity in higher education. To learn more about Dr. Flumerfelt's work, visit charactershiplean.org or connect with her on LinkedIn

President Donald Trump has been using the phrase “common sense” a lot. But it turns out that this is nothing new for politicians. This hour, we look at how common sense is used in politics. Plus, is there really such a thing as common sense? We dig into what it means and if it’s possible to teach it to artificial intelligence. GUESTS: Sophia Rosenfeld: Walter H. Annenberg Professor of History and Chair of the Department of History at the University of Pennsylvania; she is the author of multiple books, including Common Sense: A Political History and her new book, The Age of Choice: A History of Freedom in Modern Life Mark Whiting: Research fellow at the Computational Social Science lab at the University of Pennsylvania and chief technology officer of the startup Pareto.AI; you can find the common sense survey here Mayank Kejriwal: Research professor and principal scientist at the University of Southern California The Colin McEnroe Show is available as a podcast on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Amazon Music, TuneIn, Listen Notes, or wherever you get your podcasts. Subscribe and never miss an episode! Subscribe to The Noseletter, an email compendium of merriment, secrets, and ancient wisdom brought to you by The Colin McEnroe Show. Join the conversation on Facebook and Twitter. Colin McEnroe, Angelica Gajewski, and Dylan Reyes contributed to this show, which originally aired on March 6, 2025.Support the show: http://www.wnpr.org/donateSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Send us a textJoin us as Mark Goldhart and Trevor Crump explore the critical importance of creative velocity and diversity in digital advertising. They dive into how uploading varied content more frequently can lead to lower CPMs and better overall ad performance. The duo shares insights on leveraging user-generated content, the value of static ads, and why aiming for "lightning in a bottle" isn't a sustainable strategy. They also touch on the Pareto principle in advertising and draw parallels with sports to illustrate the need for consistent, predictable outcomes in marketing.Follow  ⁨@unstoppablemarketerpodcast⁩ on instagram and youtube for daily marketing insights and direct feedback.

La comunidad del Club de Lectura ya es una realidad, creamos un CANAL en Whatsapp para todos los amantes de los libros

On this episode of Next Level CRE, Matt Faircloth interviews Paul Moore. Paul shares his remarkable journey from selling his first company and chasing “shiny objects” that left him $2.5M in debt, to giving his way out during the 2008 crash, and eventually pivoting into real estate. He explains why multifamily wasn't the “perfect investment,” how Wellings Capital now focuses on fund-of-funds strategies using Pareto's principle to back only top-tier operators, and why diversification across operators, geographies, and asset classes is key. Paul also highlights how private equity firms vet operators, what passives should know about due diligence (including NOI audits), and how Wellings has raised over $800K to fight human trafficking through AIM Paul Moore Current role: Founder & Managing Partner, Wellings Capital Based in: Lynchburg, Virginia Say hi to them at: LinkedIn| Wellings Capital| AIM Free Get 50% Off Monarch Money, the all-in-one financial tool at www.monarchmoney.com with code BESTEVER Join the Best Ever Community  The Best Ever Community is live and growing - and we want serious commercial real estate investors like you inside. It's free to join, but you must apply and meet the criteria.  Connect with top operators, LPs, GPs, and more, get real insights, and be part of a curated network built to help you grow. Apply now at ⁠www.bestevercommunity.com⁠ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In this episode of The Tech Leader's Playbook, Avetis Antaplyan sits down with Andrew McVeigh, veteran technology leader and Chief Architect, whose career spans transformations at Hulu, Riot Games, and beyond. Andrew has navigated multi-billion-dollar shifts across industries from finance to gaming and healthcare, leaving behind architectures that still power companies today.The conversation dives deep into some of the most pressing questions in modern tech leadership: What matters most—EQ, IQ, or AI? Should organizations rebuild systems from scratch or evolve incrementally? Andrew shares candid stories, including lessons from Riot Games, the pitfalls of full rewrites, and the importance of balancing optimism with realism.Listeners will gain insight into how domain expertise and generalist skills complement one another, why EQ becomes more critical than IQ at senior levels, and how AI is reshaping engineering work without eliminating the need for human craft. Andrew also reflects on personal resilience, leadership missteps (like literally flipping a table), and the value of building systems and cultures that endure. This episode offers a rare inside look into decades of architectural wisdom and leadership lessons applicable to anyone guiding teams through complexity and changeTakeawaysEQ often outweighs IQ at senior leadership levels when managing large teams.Losing emotional control may feel satisfying in the moment but erodes long-term trust and outcomes.Generalists and specialists both play vital roles—large-scale architecture requires a mix of both.Domain expertise is valuable but shouldn't be an absolute barrier to hiring strong engineers.Successful engineers learn to work at the level of intention rather than just tasks.Psychological safety fuels better performance and innovation in teams.AI augments, not replaces—engineers must learn to collaborate with it effectively.Craft and fundamentals (e.g., programming) remain essential even as AI automates repetitive work.The Pareto principle (80/20) applies broadly—focus on high-leverage outcomes, not perfection.Full rewrites often fail; incremental evolution with a defined “North Star” strategy is safer.Optimism in leadership can shift cultures and reframe challenges as opportunities.Balancing results with humanity ensures people want to work with you again.Chapters00:00 Intro: EQ, IQ, or AI?01:15 Guest Introduction: Andrew McVeigh's career at Hulu, Riot Games, and more02:30 Industry Crossovers: From finance to gaming to healthcare04:10 Specialists vs. Generalists in large-scale systems05:20 The rising importance of EQ in leadership07:10 Riot Games culture and the “must be a gamer” debate11:20 What makes great engineers stand out13:40 Leadership, personal resilience, and the humanity factor17:50 How AI reshapes engineering work22:30 Applying the Pareto principle in tech leadership24:50 The rewrite dilemma: Start over or evolve?31:20 Preserving value while modernizing legacy systems36:10 Final thoughts: EQ, IQ, or AI? Andrew's choice37:30 Book recommendations and sources of inspiration38:40 Closing advice: Attitude, optimism, and ownership39:45 Outro and how to connect with AndrewAndrew McVeigh's Social Media Links:https://www.linkedin.com/in/andrewmcveigh/Andrew McVeigh's Website:https://www.suvoda.com/Resources and Links:https://www.hireclout.comhttps://www.podcast.hireclout.comhttps://www.linkedin.com/in/hirefasthireright

Hello, welcome to the Safety Culture Excellence podcast, hosted by Shawn Galloway, CEO of ProAct Safety.    This week's podcast is about "Aiming at the Right Target." Does your Pareto analysis confirm your focus? https://proactsafety.com/solutions/consulting/transformational-pareto-analysis          I hope you enjoy the podcast.  Have a great week!    Shawn M. Galloway   Unlock the potential of engagement in your organization with Shared Ownership: Engaging the Subcultures.

Built primarily for institutional-grade clients,  Pareto delivers customizable on-chain credit markets designed to expand DeFi liquidity and TradFi tokenization through structured yield strategies tailored to diverse risk profiles. Pareto allows its users to construct individualized credit lines in specific risk-ajusted tranches, with custom: interest rates, lockup periods, withdrawal cycles, reserve ratios, etc. In addition, Pareto's USP is an yield-bearing synthetic stablecoin, fully backed by major stablecoins, that can be deployed into a diversified portfolio of liquid, short- and long-term credit, thus increasing capital efficiency.Topics covered in this episode:Matteo's backgroundIdle Finance yield optimizationPivoting to ParetoInstitutional borrowers in early DeFiCompetitive advantage of ParetoOutsourcing underwritingManaging defaultsCustomized lendingKYC requirementsTimeline terms ‘marketplace'USP, Pareto's synthetic yield-bearing dollarLegal framework & credit allocatorsUSP yield, liquidity & integrations‘Opaque' credit vs. DeFiPareto smart contracts and redeemsSuccess in on-chain credit marketsEpisode links:Matteo Pandolfi on XParetoPareto on XIdle Finance on XSponsors:Gnosis: Gnosis builds decentralized infrastructure for the Ethereum ecosystem, since 2015. This year marks the launch of Gnosis Pay— the world's first Decentralized Payment Network. Get started today at - gnosis.ioChorus One: one of the largest node operators worldwide, trusted by 175,000+ accounts across more than 60 networks, Chorus One combines institutional-grade security with the highest yields at - chorus.oneThis episode is hosted by Friederike Ernst.

Hello, welcome to the Safety Culture Excellence podcast, hosted by Shawn Galloway, CEO of ProAct Safety.    This week's podcast is about "SIF All or Nothing Thinking." Are your Pareto analysis top precautions the same between all data and SIF data? https://proactsafety.com/solutions/consulting/transformational-pareto-analysis       I hope you enjoy the podcast.  Have a great week!    Shawn M. Galloway   All of our books are available in all formats on Amazon.

In this powerful solo episode, Chris Craddock breaks down how real estate professionals can achieve more by doing less. Drawing from Pareto's Principle—also known as the 80/20 Rule—Chris explains how focusing on your highest-value activities can lead to increased income and a more balanced, stress-free life. If you're feeling overwhelmed or stuck in your business, this episode is your blueprint for working smarter—not harder.What You'll Learn:What the 80/20 Rule really means in a real estate contextWhy most agents are busy but not productive—and how to break out of the trapHow to identify your highest-dollar-producing activitiesChris's favorite delegation strategies and toolsTime-blocking tips that can double your outputHow to shift from “reactive” to “proactive” business buildingA mindset shift that reduces stress and increases profitabilityResources Mentioned:The book The ONE Thing by Gary Keller & Jay PapasanThe Eisenhower Matrix (for task prioritization)Virtual Assistant services (Chris mentions how he uses them for delegation)Connect with Chris:

In this episode, Jared Quincy Davis, founder and CEO at Foundry, introduces the concept of "compound AI systems," which allows users to create powerful, efficient applications by composing multiple, often diverse, AI models and services. We discuss how these "networks of networks" can push the Pareto frontier, delivering results that are simultaneously faster, more accurate, and even cheaper than single-model approaches. Using examples like "laconic decoding," Jared explains the practical techniques for building these systems and the underlying principles of inference-time scaling. The conversation also delves into the critical role of co-design, where the evolution of AI algorithms and the underlying cloud infrastructure are deeply intertwined, shaping the future of agentic AI and the compute landscape. The complete show notes for this episode can be found at https://twimlai.com/go/740.

Learn the essential quality tools every manufacturer needs, including control charts, Pareto analysis, and root cause methods. Discover how to distinguish between normal and special cause variation.

Nate Littlewood, fractional CFO and mentor, is on today's episode to shed some light on the 3 most common financial challenges that affects most e-commerce entrepreneurs and talks about how to fix them. He talks about the ways you can optimize inventory, cash flow, and reduce overhead costs.  Get mystery shopped for your brand and 2 competitors of your choice FOR FREE! Stord will provide a detailed report that outlines the specific areas you are out performing your competitors and where your competitors are outperforming you. Learn how your consumers truly experience your brand today! Cash flow is king when it comes to e-commerce businesses.  More often than not business owners need to use debt to order more inventory, while keeping the price the same.  Does that really make sense if all your profit ends up going to your SBA loan leaving you with nothing?  It doesn't.  That's why in today's episode we have Nate Littlewood on the podcast. He's a fractional CFO with a background in finance, and he helps e-commerce entrepreneurs figure out how they can improve their finance literacy. He's on the podcast today to talk about the 3 ways e-commerce businesses can improve their profit margins so they  can start feeling their bank accounts grow.    The Big Takeaways Many entrepreneurs have most of their cash flow tied up in inventory, making business cash flow a huge struggle.  Fixing inventory can be an easy way to gain back some cash flow which makes your business more nimble and adaptable. Every now and then, you should assume that your SaaS budget is zero and make a case for why certain tools need to be purchased again. The 80-20 rule or The Pareto principle should help you with deciding which products to axe and which to keep. Offering more product variations does not lead to linear increased sales. Having low cash flow stops your business from growing faster than it could. Investing in supply chain optimization can also free up cash flow for your business. Timestamps 00:00 - Introduction to Financial Challenges in E-commerce 03:02 - Understanding Inventory Management and Cash Flow 18:48 - Optimizing Indirect and Overhead Costs 25:02 - Negotiating Discounts and Customer Retention 26:29 - Identifying Overspending in SaaS and Marketing 28:23 - The Importance of Inventory Management 30:40 - The Unsexy Side of Business Operations 32:00 - Applying the Pareto Principle to Product Portfolios 39:00 - The Dangers of Overcomplicating Product Offerings 41:03 - Focusing on Strengths and Delegating Tasks 44:28 - Helping Founders Achieve Financial Clarity Guest Resources Nate Littlewood's Website Nate's Free Cash Flow Improvement Course Nate LinkedIn Page As always, if you have any questions or anything that you need help with, leave a comment down below if you're interested. Don't forget to leave us a review on iTunes if you enjoy our content. Thanks for listening! Until next time, happy selling!

Do you ever feel like there's just too much to do and not enough time? Let's chat about the 80-20 rule, also known as the Pareto principle, and how it can actually become your secret weapon in conquering life's endless to-do lists. You may have heard about the 80-20 rule in a business setting—like how 80% of your revenue might come from 20% of your customers. However, did you know that it can also significantly impact how you manage your daily tasks? By identifying the 20% of tasks that bring you 80% of the results, you can finally take control and declutter your life. Here's a sad twist: while the principle itself is golden, it's often misused. Think of the exaggerations like claiming 80% of life happens to only 20% of people! Ridiculous, right? The truth is, the rule can't be boxed into rigid statistics, but it serves as a useful mental model for prioritizing what truly matters. What's important is figuring out what tasks are your mission-critical ones each day. As you pare down the non-essential, focus intensifies and progress follows. Even big names like Elon Musk swear by this approach. While it might not provide a magical one-size-fits-all solution, applying the 80-20 rule could very well be the life hack you've been searching for. For more information of LB&B, check out the links below, and if you found this useful, consider buying me a coffee below.       Life Passion & Business Podcast is about finding answers to life's big questions through weekly interviews with guest speakers. The Shortcast is my ongoing commitment to staying inquisitive and passionate about life, with whatever is alive for me each week. Follow the links below to discover what else is on offer.     The Five Questions eBook: https://lifepassionandbusiness.com/the-five-questions Focus Coaching: https://lifepassionandbusiness.com/focus-coaching/ Support The Podcast:https://www.buymeacoffee.com/lifeandpassion Midlife Survey: https://lifepassionandbusiness.com/midlife-challenge/                                    

Dream of raising a "Renaissance man or woman" who can do almost anything? Dr. Roger Smith from Parenting Matters Now shares a crucial skill: mastering the to-do list. Discover how applying the Pareto principle (the 80/20 rule) to prioritize tasks can boost productivity for both you and your children, helping them develop essential life skills and focus on what truly matters. Visit me at: https://rogersmithmd.com/ This has been a production of ThePodcastUpload.com 

Conversamos con Milly Cabán, ingeniera y coach, quien presenta su nuevo libro, De Sueños a Proyectos: Cómo Construir la Mejor Versión de Ti. Exploramos cómo aplicar conceptos de la ingeniería en la vida diaria para transformar ideas en acciones concretas. Millie comparte su enfoque en la cultura organizacional y el clima de trabajo, resaltando la metodología de Kaizen para implementar mejoras sostenibles. Durante la charla, destacamos la importancia de la disciplina y herramientas prácticas, como la metodología DMAIC, para facilitar cambios significativos. Milly enfatiza el principio de Pareto y cómo decisiones intencionales en hábitos diarios pueden impactar nuestros objetivos. El episodio se adentra en la integración de la vida profesional y personal, motivando a los oyentes a construir relaciones significativas que trasciendan los logros profesionales.