Podcasts about interpol red notice

** There are less than 10 tickets remaining for the live recording of Uncommons with Catherine McKenna on Thursday Oct 2nd. Register for free here. **On this two-part episode of Uncommons, Nate digs into Bill C-2 and potential impacts on privacy, data surveillance and sharing with US authorities, and asylum claims and refugee protections.In the first half, Nate is joined by Kate Robertson, senior researcher at the University of Toronto's Citizen Lab. Kate's career has spanned criminal prosecutions, regulatory investigations, and international human rights work with the United Nations in Cambodia. She has advocated at every level of court in Canada, clerked at the Supreme Court, and has provided pro bono services through organizations like Human Rights Watch Canada. Her current research at Citizen Lab examines the intersection of technology, privacy, and the law.In part two, Nate is joined by Adam Sadinsky, a Toronto-based immigration and refugee lawyer and co-chair of the Canadian Association of Refugee Lawyers' Advocacy Committee. Adam has represented clients at every level of court in Canada, including the Supreme Court, and was co-counsel in M.A.A. v. D.E.M.E. (2020 ONCA 486) and Canadian Council for Refugees v. Canada (2023 SCC 17).Further Reading:Unspoken Implications A Preliminary Analysis of Bill C-2 and Canada's Potential Data-Sharing Obligations Towards the United States and Other Countries - Kate Robertson, Citizen LabKate Robertson Chapters:00:00 Introduction & Citizen Lab03:00 Bill C-2 and the Strong Borders Act08:00 Data Sharing and Human Rights Concerns15:00 The Cloud Act & International Agreements22:00 Real-World Examples & Privacy Risks28:00 Parliamentary Process & Fixing the BillAdam Sadinsky Chapters:33:33 Concerns Over Asylum Eligibility in Canada36:30 Government Goals and Fairness for Refugee Claimants39:00 Changing Country Conditions and New Risks41:30 The Niagara Falls Example & Other Unfair Exclusions44:00 Frivolous vs. Legitimate Claims in the Refugee System47:00 Clearing the Backlog with Fair Pathways50:00 Broad Powers Granted to the Government52:00 Privacy Concerns and Closing ReflectionsPart 1: Kate RobertsonNate Erskine-Smith00:00-00:01Kate, thanks for joining me.Kate Robertson00:01-00:01Thanks for having me.Nate Erskine-Smith00:02-00:15So I have had Ron Debert on the podcast before. So for people who really want to go back into the archive, they can learn a little bit about what the Citizen Lab is. But for those who are not that interested, you're a senior researcher there. What is the Citizen Lab?Kate Robertson00:16-01:00Well, it's an interdisciplinary research lab based at University of Toronto. It brings together researchers from a technology standpoint, political science, lawyers like myself and other disciplines to examine the intersection between information and communication technologies, law, human rights, and global security. And over time, it's published human rights reports about some of the controversial and emerging surveillance technologies of our time, including spyware or AI-driven technologies. And it's also really attempted to produce a thoughtful research that helps policymakers navigate some of these challenges and threats.Nate Erskine-Smith01:01-02:50That's a very good lead into this conversation because here we have Bill C-2 coming before Parliament for debate this fall, introduced in June, at the beginning of June. And it's called the Strong Borders Act in short, but it touches, I started counting, it's 15 different acts that are touched by this omnibus legislation. The government has laid out a rationale around strengthening our borders, keeping our borders secure, combating transnational organized crime, stopping the flow of illegal fentanyl, cracking down on money laundering, a litany of things that I think most people would look at and say broadly supportive of stopping these things from happening and making sure we're enhancing our security and the integrity of our immigration system and on. You, though, have provided some pretty thoughtful and detailed rational legal advice around some of the challenges you see in the bill. You're not the only one. There are other challenges on the asylum changes we're making. There are other challenges on lawful access and privacy. You've, though, highlighted, in keeping with the work of the Citizen Lab, the cross-border data sharing, the challenges with those data sharing provisions in the bill. It is a bit of a deep dive and a little wonky, but you've written a preliminary analysis of C2 and Canada's potential data sharing obligations towards the U.S. and other countries, unspoken implications, and you published it mid-June. It is incredibly relevant given the conversation we're having this fall. So if you were to at a high level, and we'll go ahead and some of the weeds, but at a high level articulate the main challenges you see in the legislation from the standpoint that you wrote in unspoken implications. Walk us through them.Kate Robertson02:51-06:15Well, before C2 was tabled for a number of years now, myself and other colleagues at the lab have been studying new and evolving ways that we're seeing law enforcement data sharing and cross-border cooperation mechanisms being put to use in new ways. We have seen within this realm some controversial data sharing frameworks under treaty protocols or bilateral agreement mechanisms with the United States and others, which reshape how information is shared with law enforcement in foreign jurisdictions and what kinds of safeguards and mechanisms are applied to that framework to protect human rights. And I think as a really broad trend, what is probably most, the simplest way to put it is that what we're really seeing is a growing number of ways that borders are actually being exploited to the detriment of human rights standards. Rights are essentially falling through the cracks. This can happen either through cross-border joint investigations between agencies in multiple states in ways that essentially go forum shopping for the laws and the most locks, that's right. You can also see foreign states that seek to leverage cooperation tools in democratic states in order to track, surveil, or potentially even extradite human rights activists and dissidents, journalists that are living in exile outside their borders. And what this has really come out of is a discussion point that has been made really around the world that if crime is going to become more transient across borders, that law enforcement also needs to have a greater freedom to move more seamlessly across borders. But what often is left out of that framing is that human rights standards that are really deeply entrenched in our domestic law systems, they would also need to be concurrently meaningful across borders. And unfortunately, that's not what we're seeing. Canada is going to be facing decisions around this, both within the context of C2 and around it in the coming months and beyond, as we know that it has been considering and in negotiation around a couple of very controversial agreements. One of those, the sort of elephant in the room, so to speak, is that the legislation has been tabled at a time where we know that Canada and the United States have been in negotiations for actually a couple of years around a potential agreement called the CLOUD Act, which would quite literally cede Canada's sovereignty to the United States and law enforcement authorities and give them really a blanket opportunity to directly apply surveillance orders onto entities, both public and private in Canada?Nate Erskine-Smith06:16-07:46Well, so years in the making negotiations, but we are in a very different world with the United States today than we were two years ago. And I was just in, I was in Mexico City for a conference with parliamentarians across the Americas, and there were six Democratic congressmen and women there. One, Chuy Garcia represents Chicago district. He was telling me that he went up to ICE officials and they're masked and he is saying, identify yourself. And he's a congressman. He's saying, identify yourself. What's your ID? What's your badge number? They're hiding their ID and maintaining masks and they're refusing to identify who they are as law enforcement officials, ostensibly refusing to identify who they are to an American congressman. And if they're willing to refuse to identify themselves in that manner to a congressman. I can only imagine what is happening to people who don't have that kind of authority and standing in American life. And that's the context that I see this in now. I would have probably still been troubled to a degree with open data sharing and laxer standards on the human rights side, but all the more troubling, you talk about less democratic jurisdictions and authoritarian regimes. Well, isn't the U.S. itself a challenge today more than ever has been? And then shouldn't we maybe slam the pause button on negotiations like this? Well, you raise a number of really important points. And I think thatKate Robertson07:47-09:54there have been warning signs and worse that have long preceded the current administration and the backsliding that you're commenting upon since the beginning of 2025. Certainly, I spoke about the increasing trend of the exploitation of borders. I mean, I think we're seeing signs that really borders are actually, in essence, being used as a form of punishment, even in some respects, which I would say it is when you say to someone who would potentially exercise due process rights against deportation and say if you exercise those rights, you'll be deported to a different continent from your home country where your rights are perhaps less. And that's something that UN human rights authorities have been raising alarm bells about around the deportation of persons to third countries, potentially where they'll face risks of torture even. But these patterns are all too reminiscent of what we saw in the wake of 9-11 and the creation of black sites where individuals, including Canadian persons, were detained or even tortured. And really, this stems from a number of issues. But what we have identified in analyzing potential cloud agreement is really just the momentous decision that the Canadian government would have to make to concede sovereignty to a country which is in many ways a pariah for refusing to acknowledge extraterritorial international human rights obligations to persons outside of its borders. And so to invite that type of direct surveillance and exercise of authority within Canada's borders was a country who has refused for a very long time, unlike Canada and many other countries around the world, has refused to recognize through its courts and through its government any obligation to protect the international human rights of people in Canada.Nate Erskine-Smith09:56-10:21And yet, you wrote, some of the data and surveillance powers in Bill C-2 read like they could have been drafted by U.S. officials. So you take the frame that you're just articulating around with what the U.S. worldview is on this and has been and exacerbated by obviously the current administration. But I don't love the sound of it reading like it was drafted by AmericanKate Robertson10:22-12:43officials. Well, you know, it's always struck me as a really remarkable story, to be frank. You know, to borrow Dickens' tale of two countries, which is that since the 1990s, Canada's Supreme Court has been charting a fundamentally different course from the constitutional approach that's taken the United States around privacy and surveillance. And it really started with persons looking at what's happening and the way that technology evolves and how much insecurity people feel when they believe that surveillance is happening without any judicial oversight. And looking ahead and saying, you know what, if we take this approach, it's not going to go anywhere good. And that's a really remarkable decision that was made and has continued to be made by the court time and time again, even as recently as last year, the court has said we take a distinct approach from the United States. And it had a lot of foresight given, you know, in the 1990s, technology is nowhere near what it is today. Of course. And yet in the text of C2, we see provisions that, you know, I struggle when I hear proponents of the legislation describe it as balanced and in keeping with the Charter, when actually they're proposing to essentially flip the table on principles that have been enshrined for decades to protect Canadians, including, for example, the notion that third parties like private companies have the authority to voluntarily share our own. information with the police without any warrant. And that's actually the crux of what has become a fundamentally different approach that I think has really led Canada to be a more resilient country when it comes to technological change. And I sometimes describe us as a country that is showing the world that, you know, it's possible to do both. You can judicially supervise investigations that are effective and protect the public. And the sky does not fall if you do so. And right now we're literally seeing and see to something that I think is really unique and important made in Canada approach being potentially put on the chopping block.Nate Erskine-Smith12:44-13:29And for those listening who might think, okay, well, at a high level, I don't love expansive data sharing and reduced human rights protections, but practically, are there examples? And you pointed to in your writing right from the hop, the Arar case, and you mentioned the Supreme Court, but they, you know, they noted that it's a chilling example of the dangers of unconditional information sharing. And the commission noted to the potentially risky exercise of open ended, unconditional data sharing as well. But that's a real life example, a real life Canadian example of what can go wrong in a really horrible, tragic way when you don't have guardrails that focus and protect human rights.Kate Robertson13:31-14:56You're right to raise that example. I raise it. It's a really important one. It's one that is, I think, part of, you know, Canada has many commendable and important features to its framework, but it's not a perfect country by any means. That was an example of just information sharing with the United States itself that led to a Canadian citizen being rendered and tortured in a foreign country. Even a more recent example, we are not the only country that's received requests for cooperation from a foreign state in circumstances where a person's life is quite literally in jeopardy. We have known from public reporting that in the case of Hardeep Najjar, before he was ultimately assassinated on Canadian soil, an Interpol Red Notice had been issued about him at the request of the government of India. And the government had also requested his extradition. And we know that there's a number of important circumstances that have been commented upon by the federal government in the wake of those revelations. And it's provoked a really important discussion around the risks of foreign interference. But it is certainly an example where we know that cooperation requests have been made in respect of someone who's quite literally and tragically at risk of loss of life.Nate Erskine-Smith14:57-16:07And when it comes to the, what we're really talking about is, you mentioned the Cloud Act. There's also, I got to go to the notes because it's so arcane, but the second additional protocol to the Budapest Convention. These are, in that case, it's a treaty that Canada would ratify. And then this piece of legislation would in some way create implementing authorities for. I didn't fully appreciate this until going through that. And I'd be interested in your thoughts just in terms of the details of these. And we can make it as wonky as you like in terms of the challenges that these treaties offer. I think you've already articulated the watering down of traditional human rights protections and privacy protections we would understand in Canadian law. But the transparency piece, I didn't fully appreciate either. And as a parliamentarian, I probably should have because there's... Until reading your paper, I didn't know that there was a policy on tabling of treaties That really directs a process for introducing treaty implementing legislation. And this process also gets that entirely backwards.Kate Robertson16:09-17:01That's right. And, you know, in researching and studying what to do with, you know, what I foresee is potentially quite a mess if we were to enter into a treaty that binds us to standards that are unconstitutional. You know, that is a diplomatic nightmare of sorts, but it's also one that would create, you know, a constitutional entanglement of that's really, I think, unprecedented in Canada. But nevertheless, that problem is foreseen if one or both of these were to go ahead. And I refer to that in the cloud agreement or the 2AP. But this policy, as I understand it, I believe it was tabled by then Foreign Affairs Minister Maxime Bernier, as he was at the time, by Prime Minister Harper's government.Nate Erskine-Smith17:02-17:04He's come a long way.Kate Robertson17:07-18:12I believe that the rationale for the policy was quite self-evident at the time. I mean, if you think about the discussions that are happening right now, for example, in Quebec around digital sovereignty and the types of entanglements that U.S. legal process might impact around Quebec privacy legislation. Other issues around the AI space in Ontario or our health sector in terms of technology companies in Ontario. These treaties really have profound implications at a much broader scale than the federal government and law enforcement. And that's not even getting to Indigenous sovereignty issues. And so the policy is really trying to give a greater voice to the range of perspectives that a federal government would consider before binding Canada internationally on behalf of all of these layers of decision making without perhaps even consulting with Parliament First.Nate Erskine-Smith18:12-19:15So this is, I guess, one struggle. There's the specific concerns around watering down protections, but just on process. This just bothered me in particular because we're going to undergo this process in the fall. And so I printed out the Strong Borders Act, Government of Canada Strengthens Border Security and the backgrounder to the law. And going through it, it's six pages when I print it out. And it doesn't make mention of the Budapest Convention. It doesn't make mention of the Cloud Act. It doesn't make mention of any number of rationales for this legislation. But it doesn't make mention that this is in part, at least, to help implement treaties that are under active negotiation. not only gets backwards the policy, but one would have thought, especially I took from your paper, that the Department has subsequently, the Justice Department has subsequently acknowledged that this would in fact help the government implement these treaties. So surely it shouldKate Robertson19:15-19:57be in the background. I would have thought so. As someone that has been studying these treaty frameworks very carefully, it was immediately apparent to me that they're at least relevant. It was put in the briefing as a question as to whether or not the actual intent of some of these new proposed powers is to put Canada in a position to ratify this treaty. And the answer at that time was yes, that that is the intent of them. And it was also stated that other cooperation frameworks were foreseeable.Nate Erskine-Smith19:59-20:57What next? So here I am, one member of parliament, and oftentimes through these processes, we're going to, there's the objective of the bill, and then there's the details of the bill, and we're going to get this bill to a committee process. I understand the intention is for it to be a pretty fulsome committee hearing, and it's an omnibus bill. So what should happen is the asylum components should get kicked to the immigration committee. The pieces around national security should obviously get kicked to public safety committee, and there should be different committees that deal with their different constituent elements that are relevant to those committees. I don't know if it will work that way, but that would be a more rational way of engaging with a really broad ranging bill. Is there a fix for this though? So are there amendments that could cure it or is it foundationally a problem that is incurable?Kate Robertson20:58-21:59Well, I mean, I think that for myself as someone studying this area, it's obvious to me that what agreements may be struck would profoundly alter the implications of pretty much every aspect of this legislation. And that stems in part from just how fundamental it would be if Canada were to cede its sovereignty to US law enforcement agencies and potentially even national security agencies as well. But obviously, the provisions themselves are quite relevant to these frameworks. And so it's clear that Parliament needs to have the opportunity to study how these provisions would actually be used. And I am still left on knowing how that would be possible without transparencyNate Erskine-Smith22:00-22:05about what is at stake in terms of potential agreements. Right. What have we agreed to? If thisKate Robertson22:05-24:57is implementing legislation what are we implementing certainly it's a significantly different proposition now even parking the international data sharing context the constitutional issues that are raised in the parts of the bill that i'm able to study within my realm of expertise which is in the context of omnibus legislation not the entire bill of course yeah um but it's hard to even know where to begin um the the the powers that are being put forward you know i kind of have to set the table a bit to understand to explain why the table is being flipped yeah yeah we're at a time where um you know a number of years ago i published about the growing use of algorithms and AI and surveillance systems in Canada and gaps in the law and the need to bring Canada's oversight into the 21st century. Those gaps now, even five years later, are growing into chasms. And we've also had multiple investigative reports by the Privacy Commissioner of Canada being sent to Parliament about difficulties it's had reviewing the activities of law enforcement agencies, difficulties it's had with private sector companies who've been non-compliant with privacy legislation, and cooperating at all with the regulator. And we now have powers being put forward that would essentially say, for greater certainty, it's finders keepers rules. Anything in the public domain can be obtained and used by police without warrant. And while this has been put forward as a balancing of constitutional norms, the Supreme Court has said the opposite. It's not an all or nothing field. And in the context of commercial data brokers that are harvesting and selling our data, including mental health care that we might seek online, AI-fueled surveillance tools that are otherwise unchecked in the Canadian domain. I think this is a frankly stunning response to the context of the threats that we face. And I really think it sends and creates really problematic questions around what law enforcement and other government agencies are expected to do in the context of future privacy reviews when essentially everything that's been happening is supposedly being green lit with this new completely un-nuanced power. I should note you are certainly not alone in theseNate Erskine-Smith24:57-27:07concerns. I mean, in addition to the paper that I was talking about at the outset that you've written as an analyst that alongside Ron Deaver in the Citizen Lab. But there's another open letter you've signed that's called for the withdrawal of C2, but it's led by open media. I mean, BCCLA, British Columbia Civil Liberties Association, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, the Canadian Council for Refugees, QP, International Civil Liberties Monitoring Group, Penn Canada, the Center for Free Expression, privacy experts like Colin Bennett, who I used be on the Privacy Committee and that were pretty regular witnesses. You mentioned the Privacy Commissioner has not signed the open letter, but the Privacy Commissioner of both Canada and the Information Commissioner of Ontario, who's also responsible for privacy. In the context of the treaties that you were mentioning, the Budapest Convention in particular, they had highlighted concerns absent updated, modernized legislation. And at the federal level, we have had in fits and starts attempts to modernize our private sector privacy legislation. But apart from a consultation paper at one point around the Privacy Act, which would apply to public sector organizations, there's really been no serious effort to table legislation or otherwise modernize that. So am I right to say, you know, we are creating a myriad number of problems with respect to watering down privacy and human rights protections domestically and especially in relation to foreign governments with relation to data of our citizens here. And we could potentially cure those problems, at least in part, if we modernize our privacy legislation and our privacy protections and human rights protections here at home. But we are, as you say, a gap to chasm. We are so woefully behind in that conversation. It's a bit of an odd thing to pass the open-ended data sharing and surveillance piece before you even have a conversation around updating your privacy protections.Kate Robertson27:07-28:13Yeah, I mean, frankly, odd, I would use the word irresponsible. We know that these tools, it's becoming increasingly well documented how impactful they are for communities and individuals, whether it's wrongful arrests, whether it's discriminatory algorithms. really fraught tools to say the least. And it's not as if Parliament does not have a critical role here. You know, in decades past, to use the example of surveillance within Quebec, which was ultimately found to have involved, you know, years of illegal activity and surveillance activities focused on political organizing in Quebec. And that led to Parliament striking an inquiry and ultimately overhauling the mandate of the RCMP. There were recommendations made that the RCMP needs to follow the law. That was an actual recommendation.Nate Erskine-Smith28:14-28:16I'm sorry that it needs to be said, but yeah.Kate Robertson28:16-29:05The safeguards around surveillance are about ensuring that when we use these powers, they're being used appropriately. And, you know, there isn't even, frankly, a guarantee that judicial oversight will enable this to happen. And it certainly provides comfort to many Canadians. But we know, for example, that there were phones being watched of journalists in Montreal with, unfortunately, judicial oversight not even that many years ago. So this is something that certainly is capable of leading to more abuses in Canada around political speech and online activity. And it's something that we need to be protective against and forward thinking about.Nate Erskine-Smith29:05-29:58Yeah, and the conversation has to hold at the same time considerations of public safety, of course, but also considerations for due process and privacy and human rights protections. These things, we have to do both. If we don't do both, then we're not the democratic society we hold ourselves out as. I said odd, you said irresponsible. You were forceful in your commentary, but the open letter that had a number of civil society organizations, I mentioned a few, was pretty clear to say the proposed legislation reflects little more than shameful appeasement of the dangerous rhetoric and false claims about our country emanating from the United States. It's a multi-pronged assault on the basic human rights and freedoms Canada holds dear. Got anything else to add?Kate Robertson30:00-30:56I mean, the elephant in the room is the context in which the legislation has been tabled within. And I do think that we're at a time where we are seeing democratic backsliding around the world, of course, and rising digital authoritarianism. And these standards really don't come out of the air. They're ones that need to be protected. And I do find myself, when I look at some of the really un-nuanced powers that are being put forward, I do find myself asking whether or not those risks are really front and center when we're proposing to move forward in this way. And I can only defer to experts from, as you said, hundreds of organizations that have called attention towards pretty much every aspect of this legislation.Nate Erskine-Smith30:57-31:44And I will have the benefit of engaging folks on the privacy side around lawful access and around concerns around changes to the asylum claim and due process from the Canadian Association of Refugee Lawyers. But as we do see this move its way through Parliament, if we see it move its way through Parliament in the fall, if they're recognizing that the call was for withdrawal, but also recognizing a political reality where if it is to pass, we want to make sure we are improving it as much as possible. If there are amendments along the way, if there are other people you think that I should engage with, please do let me know because this is before us. It's an important piece of legislation. And if it's not to be withdrawn, we better improve it as much as possible.Kate Robertson31:46-32:02I appreciate that offer and really commend you for covering the issue carefully. And I really look forward to more engagement from yourself and other colleagues in parliament as legislation is considered further. I expect you will be a witness at committee,Nate Erskine-Smith32:02-32:06but thanks very much for the time. I really appreciate it. Thanks for having me.Part 2: Adam SadinskyChapters:33:33 Concerns Over Asylum Eligibility in Canada36:30 Government Goals and Fairness for Refugee Claimants39:00 Changing Country Conditions and New Risks41:30 The Niagara Falls Example & Other Unfair Exclusions44:00 Frivolous vs. Legitimate Claims in the Refugee System47:00 Clearing the Backlog with Fair Pathways50:00 Broad Powers Granted to the Government52:00 Privacy Concerns and Closing ReflectionsNate Erskine-Smith33:33-33:35Adam, thanks for joining me.Adam Sadinsky33:35-33:36Thanks for having me, Nate.Nate Erskine-Smith33:36-33:57We've had a brief discussion about this, by way of my role as an MP, but, for those who are listening in, they'll have just heard a rundown of all the concerns that the Citizen Lab has with data surveillance and data sharing with law enforcement around the world. You've got different concerns about C2 and you represent the Canadian Association of Refugee Lawyers. What are your concerns here?Adam Sadinsky33:57-35:31I mean, our biggest concern with this bill is new provisions that create additional categories of folks ineligible to claim asylum in Canada. And specifically to have their hearings heard at the Immigration and Refugee Board. The biggest one of those categories is definitely, a bar on individuals making refugee claims in Canada one year after they have arrived in Canada, and that's one year, whether they have been in Canada for that whole year or they left at some point and came back. Those folks who have been here, who came more than a year ago, if they now fear persecution and want to make a claim for refugee protection, this bill would shunt them into an inferior system where rather than having a full hearing in their day in court.Their application will be decided by an officer of immigration, alone, sitting in the cubicle, probably, with some papers in front of them. That person is going to make an enormous decision about whether to send that person back home where they feared persecution, torture, death. Our position is that this new form of ineligibility. Is unfair. it doesn't meet the government's goals, as we understand them, and we share, we share the views of organizations like, Citizen Lab, that the bill should be withdrawn. There are other ways to do this, but this bill is fundamentally flawed.Nate Erskine-Smith35:31-35:57Let's talk about government goals. Those looking at the influx of temporary residents in Canada specifically, and I don't, and I don't wanna pick on international students, but we've seen a huge influx of international students just as one category example. And they've said, well, if someone's been here for a year and they didn't claim right away, they didn't come here to claim asylum. Because they would've claimed within that first year, presumably, you know, what's the problem with, uh, with a rule that is really trying to tackle this problem.Adam Sadinsky35:57-38:33The issue is, I mean, Nate, you had mentioned, you know, people who had come to Canada, they didn't initially claim and it didn't initially claim asylum, temporary residents. What do we do about it? I wanna give a couple of examples of people who would be caught by this provision, who fall into that category. But there's legitimate reasons why they might claim more than a year after arriving in Canada. The first is someone who came to Canada, student worker, whatever. At the time they came to Canada, they would've been safe going back home they didn't have a fear of returning back home. But country conditions change and they can change quickly. The Taliban takeover of Afghanistan in 2021, was a stark example there may have been people who came to Canada as students planning to go back to Afghanistan and rebuild their country. As the bill is currently written. If there were to be a situation like that, and there will be some other Afghanistan, there will be some other situation down the line. Those people who weren't afraid when they originally came to Canada and now have a legitimate claim, will have an inferior, process that they go through, one that is riddled with issues, examples of unfairness compared to the refugee, the regular refugee system, and a lack of protection from deportation, pending any appeal.So that's one category. A second category is people who were afraid of going back home when they came to Canada but didn't need to claim asylum because they had another avenue to remain in Canada. So the government advertised, Minister Frazier was saying this often come to Canada, come as a student and there's a well-established pathway. You'll have a study permit, you'll get a post-graduation work permit. This is what the government wanted. The rug has been pulled out from under many of those people. Towards the end of last year when Canada said, okay, it's enough, too many temporary residents. But what about the temporary residents who had a fear of returning home when they came? They went through the system the “right way,” quote unquote. They didn't go to the asylum system. they went through another path. And now they're looking at it. They say, well, you know, I came to Canada to study, but also I'm gay and I'm from a country where, if people know about that, you know, I'll be tortured. Maybe since they've been in Canada, that person in that example, they've been in a relationship, they've been posting on social media with their partner. It is very dangerous so why, why shouldn't that person claim refugee protection through regular means?Nate Erskine-Smith38:33-39:06Is this right on your read of the law as it is written right now, if someone were to come with their family when they're a kid and they were to be in Canada for over a year and then their family were to move back to either the home country or to a different country, and, they wake up as a teenager many years later, they wake up as an adult many years later and their country's falling apart, and they were to flee and come to Canada. By virtue of the fact they've been here for a year as a kid, would that preclude them from making a claim?Adam Sadinsky39:06-39:10It's even worse than that, Nate.Nate Erskine-Smith39:09-39:10Oh, great.Adam Sadinsky39:10-39:47In your example, the family stayed in Canada for more than a year. Yes, absolutely. That person is caught by this provision. But here's who else would be someone comes when they're five years old with their family, on a trip to the United States. during that trip, they decide we want to see the Canadian side of Niagara Falls. They either have a visa or get whatever visa they need, or don't need one. They visit the falls, and at that point that they enter Canada, a clock starts ticking. That never stops ticking. So maybe they came to Canada for two hours.Nate Erskine-Smith39:44-39:45Two hours and you're outta luck.Adam Sadinsky39:45-39:47They go back to the USNate Erskine-Smith39:47-39:47Oh man.Adam Sadinsky39:47-40:09They never come back to Canada again. The way that the bill is written, that clock never stops ticking, right? Their country falls apart. They come back 15 years later. That person is going to have a very different kind of process that they go through, to get protection in Canada, than someone who wouldn't be caught by this bill.Nate Erskine-Smith40:09-40:34Say those are the facts as they are, that's one category. There's another category where I've come as a student, I thought there would be a pathway. I don't really fear persecution in my home country, but I want to stay in Canada we see in this constituency office, as other constituency offices do people come with immigration help or they've got legitimate claims. We see some people come with help with illegitimate claimsAdam Sadinsky40:34-42:46We have to be very careful when we talk about categorizing claims as frivolous. There is no question people make refugee claims in Canada that have no merit. You'll not hear from me, you'll not hear from our organization saying that every 100% of refugee claims made in Canada, are with merit. The issue is how we determine. At that initial stage that you're saying, oh, let's, let's deal quickly with frivolous claims. How do you determine if a claim is frivolous? What if someone, you know, I do a lot of appeal work, we get appeals of claims prepared by immigration consultants, or not even immigration consultants. And, you know, there's a core of a very strong refugee claim there that wasn't prepared properly.Nate Erskine-Smith42:46-42:46Yeah, we see it too. That's a good point.Adam Sadinsky42:46-42:46How that claim was prepared has nothing to do with what the person actually faces back home. We have to be very careful in terms of, quick negative claims, and clearing the decks of what some might think are frivolous claims. But there may be some legitimate and very strong core there. What could be done, and you alluded to this, is there are significant claims in the refugee board's backlog that are very, very strong just based on the countries they come from or the profiles of the individuals who have made those claims, where there are countries that have 99% success rate. And that's not because the board is super generous. It's because the conditions in those countries are very, very bad. And so the government could implement policies and this would be done without legislation to grant pathways for folks from, for example, Eritrea 99ish percent success rate. However, the government wants to deal with that in terms of numbers, but there's no need for the board to spend time determining whether this claim is in the 1%, that doesn't deserve to be accepted. Our view is that 1% being accepted is, a trade off for, a more efficient system.Nate Erskine-Smith42:46-43:30Similarly though, individuals who come into my office and they've been here for more than five years. They have been strong contributors to the community. They have jobs. They're oftentimes connected to a faith organization. They're certainly connected to a community based organization that is going to bat for them. There's, you know, obviously no criminal record in many cases they have other family here. And they've gone through so many appeals at different times. I look at that and I go, throughout Canadian history, there have been different regularization programs. Couldn't you kick a ton of people not a country specific basis, but a category specific basis of over five years, economic contributions, community contributions, no criminal record, you're approved.Adam Sadinsky43:30-44:20Yeah, I'd add to your list of categories, folks who are working in, professions, that Canada needs workers in. give the example of construction. We are facing a housing crisis. So many construction workers are not Canadian. Many of my clients who are refugee claimants waiting for their hearings are working in the construction industry. And the government did that, back in the COVID pandemic, creating what was, what became known as the Guardian Angels Program, where folks who were working in the healthcare sector, on the front lines, combating the pandemic, supporting, folks who needed it, that they were allowed to be taken again out of the refugee queue with a designated, pathway to permanent residents on the basis of the work and the contribution they were doing. All of these could be done.Adam Sadinsky44:20-45:05The refugee system is built on Canada's international obligations under the refugee convention, to claim refugee protection, to claim asylum is a human right. Every person in the world has the right to claim asylum. Individuals who are claiming asylum in Canada are exercising that right. Each individual has their own claim, and that's the real value that the refugee board brings to bear and why Canada has had a gold standard. The refugee system, replicated, around the world, every individual has their day in court, to explain to an expert tribunal why they face persecution. This bill would take that away.Nate Erskine-Smith45:05-46:18Yeah, I can't put my finger on what the other rationale would be though, because why the, why this change now? Well, we have right now, a huge number over a million people who are going to eventually be without status because they're not gonna have a pathway that was originally, that they originally thought would be there. The one frustration I have sometimes in the system is there are people who have come into my office with, the original claim, being unfounded. But then I look at it, and they've been here partly because the process took so long, they've been here for over five years. If you've been here for over five years and you're contributing and you're a member of the community, and now we're gonna kick you out. Like your original claim might have been unfounded, but this is insane. Now you're contributing to this country, and what a broken system. So I guess I'm sympathetic to the need for speed at the front end to ensure that unfounded claims are deemed unfounded and people are deported and legitimate claims are deemed founded, and they can be welcomed. So cases don't continue to come into my office that are over five or over six years long where I go, I don't even care if it was originally unfounded or not. Welcome to Canada. You've been contributing here for six years anyway.Adam Sadinsky46:18-46:33But if I can interject? Even if the bill passes as written, each of these individuals is still going to have what's called a pre-removal risk assessment.Nate Erskine-Smith46:31-46:33They're still gonna have a process. Yeah, exactly.Adam Sadinsky46:33-46:55They're still gonna have a process, and they're still going to wait time. All these people are still in the system. The bill is a bit of a shell game where folks are being just transferred from one process to another and say, oh, wow. Great. Look, we've reduced the backlog at the IRB by however many thousand claims,Nate Erskine-Smith46:53-46:55And we've increased the backlog in the process.Adam Sadinsky46:55-48:25Oh, look at the wait time at IRCC, and I'm sure you have constituents who come into your office and say, I filed a spousal sponsorship application two and a half years ago. I'm waiting for my spouse to come and it's taking so long. IRCC is not immune from processing delays. There doesn't seem to be, along with this bill, a corresponding hiring of hundreds and hundreds more pro officers. So, this backlog and this number of claims is shifting from one place to another. And another point I mentioned earlier within the refugee system within the board, when a person appeals a negative decision, right? Because, humans make decisions and humans make mistakes. And that's why we have legislative appeal processes in the system to allow for mistakes to be corrected. That appeal process happens within the board, and a person is protected from deportation while they're appealing with a pro. With this other system, it's different. The moment that an officer makes a negative decision on a pro that person is now eligible to be deported. CBSA can ask them to show up the next day and get on a plane and go home. Yes, a person can apply for judicial review in the federal court that does not stop their deportation. If they can bring a motion to the court for a stay of removal.Nate Erskine-Smith48:19-48:25You're gonna see a ton of new work for the federal court. You are gonna see double the work for the federal courtAdam Sadinsky48:25-48:39Which is already overburdened. So unless the government is also appointing many, many new judges, and probably hiring more Council Department of Justice, this backlog is going to move from one place to another.Nate Erskine-Smith48:39-48:41It's just gonna be industry whack-a-mole with the backlog.Adam Sadinsky48:41-48:52The only way to clear the backlog is to clear people out of it. There's no fair way to clear folks out of it in a negative way. So the only way to do that is positively.Nate Erskine-Smith48:52-49:37In the limited time we got left, the bill also empowers the governor and council of the cabinet to cancel documents, to suspend documents. And just so I've got this clearer in my mind, so if, for example: say one is a say, one is a student on campus, or say one is on a, on a work permit and one is involved in a protest, and that protest the government deems to be something they don't like. The government could cancel the student's permit on the basis that they were involved in the protest. Is that right? The law? Not to say that this government would do that. But this would allow the government to legally do just that. Am I reading it wrong?Adam Sadinsky49:37-50:46The bill gives broad powers to the government to cancel documents. I think you're reading it correctly. To me, when I read the bill, I don't particularly understand exactly what is envisioned. Where it would, where the government would do this, why a government would want to put this in. But you are right. I would hope this government would not do that, but this government is not going to be in power forever. When you put laws on the books, they can be used by whomever for whatever reason they can they want, that's within how that law is drafted. You know, we saw down south, you know, the secretary of State a few months ago said, okay, we're gonna cancel the permits of everyone from South Sudan, in the US because they're not taking back people being deported. It's hugely problematic. It's a complete overreach. It seems like there could be regulations that are brought in. But the power is so broad as written in this law, that it could definitely be used, for purposes most Canadians would not support.Nate Erskine-Smith50:46-51:07And, obviously that's a worst case scenario when we think about the United States in today's political climate. But, it's not clear to your point what the powers are necessary for. If we are to provide additional powers, we should only provide power as much as necessary and proportionate to the goal we want to achieve. Is there anything else you want to add?Adam Sadinsky51:07-51:43I just wanna touch, and I'm sure you got into a lot of these issues, on the privacy side but. The privacy issues in this bill bleed over into the refugee system with broad search powers, um, particularly requiring service providers to provide information, we are concerned these powers could be used by CBSA, for example, to ask a women's shelter, to hand over information about a woman claiming refugee protection or who's undocumented, living in a shelter, we have huge concerns that, you know, these powers will not just be used by police, but also by Canada Border Services and immigration enforcement. I'm not the expert on privacy issues, but we see it we see the specter of those issues as well.Nate Erskine-Smith51:43-52:22That's all the time we got, but in terms of what would help me to inform my own advocacy going forward is, this bill is gonna get to committee. I'm gonna support the bill in committee and see if we can amend it. I know, the position of CARL is withdraw. The position of a number of civil society organizations is to withdraw it. I think it's constructive to have your voice and others at committee, and to make the same arguments you made today with me. Where you have. I know your argument's gonna be withdrawn, you'll say then in the alternative, here are changes that should be made. When you've got a list of those changes in detailed, legislative amendment form, flip them to me and I'll share the ideas around the ministry and around with colleagues, and I appreciate the time. Appreciate the advocacy.Adam Sadinsky52:22-52:24Absolutely. Thank you. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.uncommons.ca

Red Notice: Und plötzlich droht die Auslieferung? In der aktuellen Folge spricht Dr. Rosinus mit Rechtsanwalt Sören Schomburg über die internationale kriminalpolizeiliche Organisation Interpol. Herr Schomburg erläutert, wie Interpol organisatorisch und finanziell aufgestellt ist und welche Ziele die Organisation verfolgt. Im Anschluss gibt er einen Überblick über die wichtigsten Instrumente, insbesondere das Ersuchen um Festnahme mit dem Ziel der Auslieferung (Red Notice). Gemeinsam erörtern sie, welche konkreten Folgen eine Red Notice für betroffene Mandanten haben kann und welche Verteidigungsstrategien in Betracht kommen. Zum Abschluss geht es um Kritikpunkte an Interpol, etwa politische Instrumentalisierung und strukturelle Defizite, sowie mögliche Reformansätze. Hier geht‘s zur Interpol-Website: https://www.interpol.int Hier geht‘s zu den wichtigsten rechtlichen Regelungen zur Arbeit von Interpol, z.B. die „Constitution of ICPO–Interpol“, die „Interpol General Regulations“ und die „Rules on the Processig of Data“: https://www.interpol.int/Who-we-are/Legal-framework/Legal-documents Hier geht´s zur Folge Rechtsprechungsupdate Wirtschaftsstrafrecht – Europäisches Verbot der Doppelbestrafung und Interpol Red Notice: https://criminal-compliance.podigee.io/55-cr Hier geht´s zur Folge Die Europäische Staatsanwaltschaft: https://criminal-compliance.podigee.io/72-cr Hier geht´s zur Folge Rechtshilfe und Auslieferung: https://criminal-compliance.podigee.io/227-cr Dr. Rosinus im Gespräch mit: Rechtsanwalt Sören Schomburg ist Partner der Kanzlei Knauer& und Strafverteidiger im internationalen Wirtschafts- und Steuerstrafrecht. Er verteidigt Mandanten in Auslieferungsverfahren, bei Interpol-Fahndungen und im Rahmen internationaler Rechtshilfe. Ein besonderer Schwerpunkt seiner Tätigkeit liegt in der Begleitung grenzüberschreitender interner Untersuchungen sowie der strafprozessualen Beratung bei Durchsuchungen und IT-Beschlagnahmen. Neben seiner anwaltlichen Praxis ist er als Fachautor und Referent zu Themen wie Interpol, Europäischer Haftbefehl und internationaler Strafrechtshilfe aktiv. Sören Schomburg ist erreichbar unter schomburg[@]knauer-partner.de oder unter +49 30 94852070-0. https://www.rosinus-on-air.com https://rosinus-partner.com

FTX loses a court battle to Three Arrows Capital, raising its claim to $1.53B. ZKsync ends its Ignite rewards early. Ethereum launches Hoodi testnet Pectra upgrade. BlackRock's BUIDL token surpasses $1B in assets. Argentina seeks an Interpol Red Notice for Hayden Davis over a memecoin linked to President Milei.RESOURCEShttps://www.theblock.co/post/346298/us-court-allows-3ac-to-expand-ftx-claim-to-1-5-billion?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rsshttps://www.theblock.co/post/346312/zksync-sunsets-ignite-token-rewards-for-defi-ecosystem-cites-market-conditions-and-focus-on-elastic-network?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rsshttps://www.theblock.co/post/346273/ethereum-developers-to-launch-new-hoodi-testnet-ahead-of-much-anticipated-pectra-upgrade?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rsshttps://www.coindesk.com/business/2025/03/13/blackrock-s-buidl-fund-tops-usd1b-with-ethena-s-usd200m-allocationhttps://fortune.com/crypto/2025/03/13/hayden-davis-javier-milei-interpol-red-notice-prosecutor-asked-judge-melania/https://www.theblock.co/post/346212/sec-vs-ripple-nears-conclusion-as-xrp-eth-comparison-takes-center-stage-report?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rssSecure your Business & Digital Life with Cyber Strategy Institute https://www.thegrowmeco.com/course/https://cyberstrategyinstitute.com/warden/ https://csi-store.samcart.com/products/wardenguard-personal-1device-annual/?coupon=DCN_Warden WHERE TO FIND DCNDailyCryptoNews.Net https://twitter.com/DCNDailyCrypto Trader Cobb X: @TraderCobbEditing Services https://www.contentbuck.com——————————————————————***NOT FINANCIAL, LEGAL, OR TAX ADVICE! JUST OPINION! I AM NOT AN EXPERT! I DO NOT GUARANTEE A PARTICULAR OUTCOME I HAVE NO INSIDE KNOWLEDGE! YOU NEED TO DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH AND MAKE YOUR OWN DECISIONS! THIS IS JUST EDUCATION & ENTERTAINMENT! ©Copyright 2024 Matthew Aaron Podcasts LLC Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Live from Bitcoin Beach in El Zonte, El Salvador, in this episode, I sit down with Enrique Ho, a former traditional finance executive turned full-blown Bitcoin advocate. Enrique's story is wild. One day, he was living the high life as a private equity guy in Panama. The next, he was on the run, hit with an Interpol Red Notice, accused of crimes he didn't commit, and forced into exile. But here's where it gets interesting, Bitcoin saved him.With his assets at risk of being frozen, Enrique remembered something his wife had told him years before: Bitcoin can't be confiscated. So, he moved his savings into BTC, not as an investment, but as financial insurance. That decision changed everything. He went down the rabbit hole, realized what Bitcoin really means, and is now dedicating his life to helping others gain financial sovereignty, especially in places where governments can seize everything overnight.We talk about how Panama missed its chance with Bitcoin while El Salvador is making all the right moves. Enrique shares his firsthand experience with the dangers of government-controlled money, something people are waking up to even in the US. He explains why he's now working with Blink (formerly Bitcoin Beach Wallet) to push Bitcoin adoption and how Latin America and Africa are about to see a massive wave of financial transformation. This one's packed with insight, real-world lessons, and a powerful story about why Bitcoin matters beyond just number go up. Don't miss it!- MikeSupport and follow Bitcoin Beach:https://twitter.com/Bitcoinbeachhttps://www.instagram.com/bitcoinbeach_sv/https://www.tiktok.com/@livefrombitcoinbeachWeb: https://www.bitcoinbeach.com/Follow Enqrique:X: https://x.com/abelitopanama / https://x.com/ho_fernandezSubstack: https://substack.com/@enriquehoLive From Bitcoin Beach

This is the Catchup on 3 Things by The Indian Express and I'm ichha Sharma.Today is the 28th of November and here are the headlines.The Lok Sabha passed a resolution today to extend the tenure of the Joint Committee on the Waqf (Amendment) Bill till the last day of the Budget session next year. Jagdambika Pal, Chairman of the Joint Committee, moved a motion stating, “That this House do extend time for the presentation of the Report of the Joint Committee on the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2024, up to the last day of the Budget Session, 2025.” The Lok Sabha approved the motion with a voice vote. The Centre had referred the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, tabled on 8th of August, to the Committee to scrutinise the Bill following the Opposition's objections. The panel's tenure was set to conclude on November 29. The CBI in an operation with the NIA and Interpol has brought from Rwanda a member of Pakistan-based terror group Lash-kar-e-Taiba who had an Interpol Red Notice against him for a terror offence in Bengaluru today. The officials said, Salman Rehman Khan, an alleged member of the internationally proscribed terrorist organisation, had assisted in providing arms, ammunition and explosives to further terrorist activities in Bengaluru. A CBI spokesperson said in a statement quote “The Global Operations CBI has closely coordinated with the NIA and Interpol National Central Bureau – Key gali for the return to India from Rwanda of Salman Rehman Khan, wanted by the NIA for terror-related offences,” unquote.West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee today condemned the arrest of Hindu ISKCON monk Chinmay Krishna Das in Bangladesh, saying that she will support whatever decision the Centre takes on the issue. Banerjee said, quote “Attacks on any religion are condemnable, we always condemn that. I talked to the ISKCON head of this state twice after the incident. But it is an international matter. We can't interfere with the Centre's decision… but we can condemn this attack,” unquote. The West Bengal BJP also started demonstrations against the arrest, with party MLAs marching to the Bangladesh Deputy High Commission office and meeting officials. The state unit also announced that they will block all the Indo-Bangla borders in West Bengal next Monday.The ceasefire deal between Israel and Lebanon based Hezbollah militant group has come into effect and thousands of people from war-torn southern Lebanon have started to return to their homes as fear looms on both sides whether the ceasefire will hold. Israel continued its barrage of attacks on Beirut and in southern Lebanon on Tuesday, killing at least 42 people until a ceasefire came into effect at 4am on Wednesday. Displaced people of Lebanon were seen driving stacked cars with personal belongings and returning to the southern part of the country, despite warnings from the Israeli army that they should stay away from the area until the Israeli forces remain over there. After the Maha Vikas Aghadi's dismal performance in the Maharashtra Assembly elections, the Shiv Sena (UBT) in Pune is likely to insist that the party contest the long-delayed civic polls alone. The city units of the Congress and the NCP, however, are keen on continuing the alliance. Elections to the Pune Municipal Corporation were last held in 2017. With the new government set to be sworn in soon, the long-delayed civic elections are likely to be held in the next few months. Though the MVA enjoyed success in the Lok Sabha elections by winning 31 of the 48 seats in the state, it only won 46 seats in the Assembly elections. Despite the poor performance, however, Prashant Jagtap, Pune NCP chief, said that he believed the Congress, NCP and Shiv Sena (UBT) should contest the PMC elections as MVA.This was the Catch Up on 3 Things by The Indian Express.

In this captivating episode of Warsaw Confidential, host Kamal Jahid sits down with Marek Zmysłowski, a Polish entrepreneur whose life story reads like a thrilling novel. From being wrongfully placed on an Interpol Red Notice to embarking on the ambitious project of building a sustainable city in the Dominican Republic, Marek's journey is a testament to resilience, determination, and visionary thinking. Can one man's journey from adversity to ambition inspire a new generation of entrepreneurs? Join us as we delve deep into Marek's life, exploring the lessons he's learned and the obstacles he's overcome.

In May 2024, a prison van was attacked at a highway toll in Normandy, France. In dramatic footage shared on social media, a black SUV, driving the wrong direction, rammed into the prison van just as it went through the barriers. Then gunmen, dressed head-to-toe in black and armed with Kalashnikov rifles got out and started shooting at the van, killing two prison officers.They opened the van and freed the prisoner, a man named Mohamed Amra, aka "The Fly", who escaped with the gunmen. There is now an Interpol Red Notice out for Amra.The attack took place in broad daylight and sheds light on the dramatic increase in gang violence over the last few years in France. Mohamed Amra had connections to the city that has been at the forefront of this violence, Marseille, on the Mediterranean coast.Speaker(s):Iris Oustinoff Leroux, YPN Coordinator and Analyst, Global Initiative against Transnational Organized CrimeLinks:(GI article) France in the crossfire: Prisoner escapes in Normandy amid rise in organized crime(GI Paper) Smoke on the horizon: Trends in arms trafficking from the conflict in Ukraine(GI Article) The Western Balkans is still the criminals' choice for weapons.Global Initiative Against Transnational Organized CrimeGlobal Organized Crime IndexSenate Report FAIT au nom de la commission d'enquête (1) sur l'impact du narcotrafic en France et les mesures à prendre pour y remédier, Additional...

Raffaele Imperiale is a high-profile Italian criminal associated with the Camorra, an organized crime syndicate. He was arrested in Dubai in August 2021 based on an INTERPOL Red Notice. Imperiale was wanted for drug trafficking and organized crime activities, having been a significant figure in the international drug trade and associated with notorious criminals like Daniel Kinahan.Following his arrest, Imperiale was extradited to Italy in March 2022. Recently, reports indicate that Imperiale has decided to cooperate with authorities. This cooperation involves providing valuable information about the criminal networks he was involved with, which is expected to have significant implications for ongoing investigations into organized crime activities.(commercial at 8:13)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Kinahan Cartel: Raffaele Imperiale has spills beans on super-cartel, leaked memos reveal - SundayWorld.com

Raffaele Imperiale is a high-profile Italian criminal associated with the Camorra, an organized crime syndicate. He was arrested in Dubai in August 2021 based on an INTERPOL Red Notice. Imperiale was wanted for drug trafficking and organized crime activities, having been a significant figure in the international drug trade and associated with notorious criminals like Daniel Kinahan.Following his arrest, Imperiale was extradited to Italy in March 2022. Recently, reports indicate that Imperiale has decided to cooperate with authorities. This cooperation involves providing valuable information about the criminal networks he was involved with, which is expected to have significant implications for ongoing investigations into organized crime activities.(commercial at 8:13)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Kinahan Cartel: Raffaele Imperiale has spills beans on super-cartel, leaked memos reveal - SundayWorld.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Raffaele Imperiale is a high-profile Italian criminal associated with the Camorra, an organized crime syndicate. He was arrested in Dubai in August 2021 based on an INTERPOL Red Notice. Imperiale was wanted for drug trafficking and organized crime activities, having been a significant figure in the international drug trade and associated with notorious criminals like Daniel Kinahan.Following his arrest, Imperiale was extradited to Italy in March 2022. Recently, reports indicate that Imperiale has decided to cooperate with authorities. This cooperation involves providing valuable information about the criminal networks he was involved with, which is expected to have significant implications for ongoing investigations into organized crime activities.(commercial at 8:13)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Kinahan Cartel: Raffaele Imperiale has spills beans on super-cartel, leaked memos reveal - SundayWorld.com

Am 23. Mai 2024 wurde das 75-jährige Bestehen des Grundgesetzes gefeiert. Das nimmt Herr Dr. Christian Rosinus zum Anlass, um sich in der heutigen Folge mit der Frage zu beschäftigen, wie das Grundgesetz das Wirtschaftsstrafrecht beeinflusst. Zunächst erläutert er dazu im Gespräch mit Volker Pietzsch exemplarisch, wie bestimmte Grundrechte – als Abwehrrechte des Bürgers gegen den Staat – Beschuldigte im Strafverfahren vor unverhältnismäßigen staatlichen Eingriffen schützen. Anschließend bespricht er anhand der sogenannten Justizgrundrechte und des Gesetzlichkeitsprinzips den Einfluss des Grundgesetzes auf das Wirtschaftsstrafverfahren. Abschließend gibt Herr Dr. Rosinus einen Ausblick, wie sich der Einfluss des Grundgesetzes auf die Gesetzgebung und Rechtsprechung in Zukunft entwickeln könnte. Der Beschluss des Bundesverfassungsgerichts vom 21. September 2016 (Az.: 2 BvL 1/15) zum Rindfleischetikettierungsgesetz ist abrufbar unter: https://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/SharedDocs/Entscheidungen/DE/2016/09/ls20160921_2bvl000115.html Hier geht's zur Folge Nr. 55 Rechtsprechungsupdate Wirtschaftsstrafrecht – Europäisches Verbot der Doppelbestrafung und Interpol Red Notice: https://criminal-compliance.podigee.io/55-rosinusonair Hier geht's zur Folge Nr. 128 Strafklageverbrauch im Sommermärchenverfahren: https://criminal-compliance.podigee.io/128-cr Hier geht's zur Folge Nr. 148 Rechtsprechungsupdate - EuGH-Entscheidung zum Doppelbestrafungsverbot https://criminal-compliance.podigee.io/148-cr Hier geht's zur Folge Nr. 173 Rechtsprechungsupdate: EuGH-Entscheidung zum ne bis in idem-Grundsatz: https://criminal-compliance.podigee.io/173-cr Hier geht's zur Folge Nr. 204 Rechtsprechungsupdate: Ne bis in idem: https://criminal-compliance.podigee.io/204-cr https://www.rosinus-on-air.com https://rosinus-partner.com

In der heutigen Folge gibt Dr. Rosinus ein Rechtsprechungsupdate zum Thema ne bis in idem. Nach einer kurzen Einführung zum Doppelbestrafungsverbot und den wichtigsten Voraussetzungen, erörtert Dr. Rosinus im Gespräch mit Volker Pietzsch die EuGH-Entscheidungen vom 19. Oktober 2023 (C 147/22). Darin hat der EuGH sich vor allem intensiv mit den Fragen befasst, wann eine endgültige Entscheidung einer Staatsanwaltschaft auf einer „Prüfung der Sache“ beruht und unter welchen Umständen dies im Rahmen eines späteren Strafverfahrens noch einmal überprüft werden kann. Dabei geht Herr Dr. Rosinus besonders darauf ein, welche (unterlassenen) Ermittlungsmaßnahmen als Indizien auf das Fehlen von eingehenden Ermittlungen hinweisen. Die Entscheidung des EuGH vom 19. Oktober 2023 (C 147/22) ist abrufbar unter: https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=278794&pageIndex=0&doclang=DE&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=3264955 Hier geht's zur Folge Nr. 55 Rechtsprechungsupdate Wirtschaftsstrafrecht – Europäisches Verbot der Doppelbestrafung und Interpol Red Notice: https://criminal-compliance.podigee.io/55-rosinusonair Hier geht's zur Folge Nr. 128 Strafklageverbrauch im Sommermärchenverfahren: https://criminal-compliance.podigee.io/128-cr Hier geht's zur Folge Nr. 148 Rechtsprechungsupdate - EuGH-Entscheidung zum Doppelbestrafungsverbot https://criminal-compliance.podigee.io/148-cr Hier geht's zur Folge Nr. 173 Rechtsprechungsupdate: EuGH-Entscheidung zum ne bis in idem-Grundsatz: https://criminal-compliance.podigee.io/173-cr https://www.rosinus-on-air.com https://rosinus-partner.com

Anlässlich der Entscheidung des EuGH vom 14. September 2023 (C-27/22) steht in der heutigen Folge der ne bis in idem-Grundsatz im Fokus. Der EuGH hat in diesem Vorabentscheidungsverfahren klare Grundsätze zur Anwendbarkeit und zur möglichen Einschränkbarkeit des Doppelbestrafungsverbotes vorgegeben. Nach einem kurzen allgemeinen Überblick zum ne bis in idem-Grundsatz geht Herr Dr. Rosinus im Detail auf das EuGH-Urteil ein. Die Entscheidung beschäftigt sich zunächst mit der Anwendbarkeit des Art. 50 Grundrechte-Charta auf Verwaltungssanktionen. Im Rahmen der zweiten Vorlagefrage geht der EuGH auf die zeitliche Reichweite des ne bis in idem-Grundsatzes ein. Besonders interessant sind schließlich die Ausführungen zur dritten Vorlagefrage. Der EuGH hält Einschränkungen des ne bis in idem-Grundsatzes unter bestimmten Voraussetzungen für gerechtfertigt. Herr Dr. Rosinus erläutert diese und rundet die Folge mit einem Fazit ab. Die Entscheidung des EuGH vom 14. September 2023 finden Sie hier: https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf;jsessionid=ADA69655ABD88E7B1C2C4EEEDD5DF417?text=&docid=277409&pageIndex=0&doclang=de&mode=req&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=26305 Hier geht's zur Folge Nr. 55 Rechtsprechungsupdate Wirtschaftsstrafrecht – Europäisches Verbot der Doppelbestrafung und Interpol Red Notice: https://criminal-compliance.podigee.io/55-rosinusonair Hier geht's zur Folge Nr. 128 Strafklageverbrauch im Sommermärchenverfahren: https://criminal-compliance.podigee.io/128-cr Hier geht's zur Folge Nr. 148 Rechtsprechungsupdate - EuGH-Entscheidung zum Doppelbestrafungsverbot https://criminal-compliance.podigee.io/148-cr

Sky News has a new podcast series called Dirty Work - investigating Interpol red notices, which allow police forces to flag their most wanted persons at international borders around the world. In episode two, reporter Sahar Zand continues to follow Brian Glendinning's story - whose Interpol Red Notice raises significant questions about how the system works. Sahar also speaks to Interpol Secretary General Jurgen Stock, who has given a rare interview talking about why it was his priority to reform a system that had let so many people down.Presenter: Sahar Zand Producer: Heidi PettSenior Producer: Sarah BurkeSound Designer: James Bradshaw Editor: Paul Stanworth

Luka Rocco Magnotta is one of Canada's most vile killers. His despicable actions prompted an Interpol Red Notice. The entire world was looking for the dirtbag who murdered a man and then did unthinkable things with the remains. While causing havoc to those around him, Luka was more concerned with his vanity than anything else. This man truly is ugly to the core. Follow us on FaceBook: https://m.facebook.com/Buried-Motives-107918331555188/ Follow us on Instagram: https://instagram.com/buriedmotives Email us: buriedmotives@gmail.com Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In this video, we're sharing a scam alert involving a British man who was scammed out of 15 million Thai baht (USD $385,000) in a condo deal in Phuket.Be aware of scams when looking to buy or sell a condo in Phuket, Pattaya, or Koh Samui. Keep your eyes open for suspicious characters, high-pressure sales tactics, and unverifiable offers. If you're ever feeling uncomfortable about a condo deal, don't hesitate to reach out to us for help!--Thaksin says he will return to Thailand in July, despite potential consequencesFormer prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra is determined to return to Thailand in July, after about 17 years of living in exile, regardless of the risk that he will be forced to serve the 10-year prison term from which he fled.Source – Thai PBS World Interpol fugitive wanted for killing Brit in Phuket surfaces in NorwayRoger Bullman, an international fugitive wanted on an Interpol Red Notice for the murder of British tourist Amiptal Bajaj at a Phuket resort in 2019, has resurfaced in his home country of Norway.Source – The Phuket News – Thaiger NewsBritish Man Says He Was Scammed for Ownership of Koh Samui CondoA 70-year-old British man has filed a report to the Thai Central Investigation Bureau (CIB) after he bought a 15-million-baht luxury condominium on Koh Samui many years ago but still has not received legal documents confirming his ownership.Source – The Pattaya NewsGovt intervenes to rescue emaciated, sick Thai elephant from Sri LankaThe Department of National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation is preparing to bring Plai Sak Surin, one of three Thai elephants in Sri Lanka, back to Thailand in early July after an outcry in the country about his mistreatment.Source – The Nation Thailand --Want to support the show? Then why not buy me a coffee! You can do so by following the link belowhttps://www.buymeacoffee.com/thaiexpatshow--Interested in starting your own podcast like the Thai Expat Daily Show? I use Buzzsprout and I can't recommend it highly enough. It makes everything super easy. Sign up today to get on the path to making great podcasts!https://www.buzzsprout.com/?referrer_id=1751572--Check out our website and forum - https://www.thaiexpatdailyshow.com--LIKE & SUBSCRIBE for new videos every dayhttps://www.youtube.com/channel/UCB8khQ_NapVMDiW09oqL-rw--Listen to our podcast on Spotify, Apple, and Amazon or on our podcast website: https://thaiexpatdailyshow.buzzsprout.com--Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/thaiexpatdailyshow--#thaiexpatdailyshow #thailandnews #phuketnewsSupport the show

05th April: Crypto & Coffee at 8

The weird thing about financial fraud is --- they can't be spotted immediately. Or worse, sometimes they take YEARS to be known to the public. This means a perpetrator of financial fraud usually has a decent amount of time to cover their tracks. Or successfully run away.  And that's what Nausha Kadeejath did! At the age of 35 years old, Nausha became one of the youngest criminals to receive an Interpol Red Notice, making her the equivalent of a "most wanted" criminal. Charged with criminal conspiracy and cheating, she is presumed to have started scamming investors at the age of 22 years. The company she started with her husband called 'Cee Vee Global Trade Solutions' ended up defrauding over 4,500 investors from south India, with the total scam resulting in about INR 4 billion. Yep. Billion with a 'B".  Also, she's still at large. No one has any clue where she is. And we presume she wants to remain that way.  Find out more at -https://episodes.ivmpodcasts.com/miss-conduct-blog  You can follow our hosts on Instagram: Miss Conduct: https://instagram.com/missconductpod Ragavi: https://www.instagram.com/ragi.dosai/ Nisha: https://www.instagram.com/just.nishful.thinking/ Do follow IVM Podcasts on social media: We are @IVMPodcasts on Facebook, Twitter, & Instagram. Follow the show across platforms: Spotify, Apple Podcasts, JioSaavan, Gaana, Google Podcasts, Amazon MusicSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The international criminal police organization Interpol turns 100 this year. Time to look at how it's helped make our world safer from crimes by catching global perpetrators — and where its so-called red notices have helped authoritarian regimes clamp down on the innocent.

In this episode, we sit with a true Titan of direct environmental defense, Paul Watson! Best known for founding the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society, Paul has spent the last several decades facilitating direct action against companies that engage in illegal and destructive operations in the ocean. We talk through Paul's journey of starting his own organization and building it into an international organization with nearly two dozen chapters across the globe! Have you ever wondered what it's like to have an Interpol Red Notice out for you? Well Paul gives us some insight into that particular experience as well! If you'd like to learn more about Sea Shepherd, click here: www.SeaShepherd.org If you'd like to learn more about our organization, click here: www.LastChanceEndeavors.com

BREAKING! Jerome Powell joins a LIVE panel to talk about crypto and what he sees necessary for Bitcoin, Altcoins and Stablecoins in 2022 & 2023! Join Cryptoman Ran in today's Crypto Banter Watch Party and be amongst the first to find out what's coming next in the crypto market! Don't miss this show! - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BEWARE OF SCAMMERS IN OUR COMMENTS AND COMMUNITY CHANNELS Disclaimer: Crypto Banter is a social podcast for entertainment purposes only. All opinions expressed by the hosts, guests and callers should not be construed as financial advice. Views expressed by guests and hosts do not reflect the views of the station. Listeners are encouraged to do their own research. #Bitcoin #Crypto #Altcoins - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 00:00 Show Summary & Intro 03:48 Bitcoin Bounce Today 04:30 NASDAQ & DYX 09:01 Bitcoin Open Interest & Leverage 09:45 GMX Shorts vs Longs Ratio 11:02 Midterm Elections 12:00 October - Bear Market Breaker 13:53 Why Does Bitcoin Pump? 17:37 Global Currency Collapse Against USD 24:29 Why This Market Cycle is Different 28:00 Interpol Red Notice for Do Kwon? 31:30 Crypto News Today 33:10 Jerome Powell Watch Party Live 36:19 Augustin Carstens Speaks About Crypto 43:25 Jerome Powell Speaks About DeFi 45:53 Ravi Menon Speaks About Stablecoins 51:19 Christine Lagarde Speaks About Bitcoin 55:20 Christine Lagarde Speaks About CBDC 1:05:30 Jerome Powell Speaks About Blockchain 1:12:00 CBDC Explained 1:15:43 $1000 ByBit Airdrop

BREAKING! Jerome Powell joins a LIVE panel to talk about crypto and what he sees necessary for Bitcoin, Altcoins and Stablecoins in 2022 & 2023! Join Cryptoman Ran in today's Crypto Banter Watch Party and be amongst the first to find out what's coming next in the crypto market! Don't miss this show! - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BEWARE OF SCAMMERS IN OUR COMMENTS AND COMMUNITY CHANNELS Disclaimer: Crypto Banter is a social podcast for entertainment purposes only. All opinions expressed by the hosts, guests and callers should not be construed as financial advice. Views expressed by guests and hosts do not reflect the views of the station. Listeners are encouraged to do their own research. #Bitcoin #Crypto #Altcoins - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 00:00 Show Summary & Intro 03:48 Bitcoin Bounce Today 04:30 NASDAQ & DYX 09:01 Bitcoin Open Interest & Leverage 09:45 GMX Shorts vs Longs Ratio 11:02 Midterm Elections 12:00 October - Bear Market Breaker 13:53 Why Does Bitcoin Pump? 17:37 Global Currency Collapse Against USD 24:29 Why This Market Cycle is Different 28:00 Interpol Red Notice for Do Kwon? 31:30 Crypto News Today 33:10 Jerome Powell Watch Party Live 36:19 Augustin Carstens Speaks About Crypto 43:25 Jerome Powell Speaks About DeFi 45:53 Ravi Menon Speaks About Stablecoins 51:19 Christine Lagarde Speaks About Bitcoin 55:20 Christine Lagarde Speaks About CBDC 1:05:30 Jerome Powell Speaks About Blockchain 1:12:00 CBDC Explained 1:15:43 $1000 ByBit Airdrop

Today's blockchain and cryptocurrency news Bitcoin is up slightly at $18,884 Ethereum is down slightly at $1296 Binance Coin down .5% at $272 Red Notice issued for Do Kwon. Vanity address exploited for $1M. Australia's CBDC pilot should finish by mid-2023. Sifu's UwU forks off of AAVE. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Welcome to The ohmTown Daily News Show (ODNS). The show is held live on https://www.twitch.tv/ohmTown/ at 6PM Eastern. I cover a selection of aggregated news articles and discuss them briefly with a perspective merging business, technology, and society. Episode: Uber Hack, 1400 Deposit Boxes, Interpol Red Notice, TRACON from Home, DARTs in Space Articles Discussed: https://www.ohmtown.com/groups/mobble/f/d/the-uber-hack-exposes-more-than-failed-data-security/ (https://www.ohmtown.com/groups/mobble/f/d/the-uber-hack-exposes-more-than-failed-data-security/) https://www.ohmtown.com/groups/hatchideas/f/d/lawsuit-filed-after-fbi-agents-raided-1400-deposit-boxes-at-a-us-private-vaults-branch-claims-owners-items-have-still-not-been-returned/ (https://www.ohmtown.com/groups/hatchideas/f/d/lawsuit-filed-after-fbi-agents-raided-1400-deposit-boxes-at-a-us-private-vaults-branch-claims-owners-items-have-still-not-been-returned/) https://www.ohmtown.com/groups/warcrafters/f/d/five-new-steam-games-you-probably-missed-september-26-2022/ (https://www.ohmtown.com/groups/warcrafters/f/d/five-new-steam-games-you-probably-missed-september-26-2022/) https://www.ohmtown.com/groups/hatchideas/f/d/brent-crude-slides-below-85-a-barrel-as-dollar-surges/ (https://www.ohmtown.com/groups/hatchideas/f/d/brent-crude-slides-below-85-a-barrel-as-dollar-surges/) https://www.ohmtown.com/groups/the-word-in-tech/f/d/widening-participation-in-stem-requires-an-attitude-change/ (https://www.ohmtown.com/groups/the-word-in-tech/f/d/widening-participation-in-stem-requires-an-attitude-change/) https://www.ohmtown.com/groups/warcrafters/f/d/interpol-issues-red-notice-for-terra-co-creator-behind-40-billion-crypto-crash/ (https://www.ohmtown.com/groups/warcrafters/f/d/interpol-issues-red-notice-for-terra-co-creator-behind-40-billion-crypto-crash/) https://www.ohmtown.com/groups/warcrafters/f/d/ultima-online-has-a-special-shield-if-youve-been-playing-for-25-years/ (https://www.ohmtown.com/groups/warcrafters/f/d/ultima-online-has-a-special-shield-if-youve-been-playing-for-25-years/) https://www.ohmtown.com/groups/the-word-in-tech/f/d/researchers-determine-bright-magnetic-relationship-for-decaying-sunspots/ (https://www.ohmtown.com/groups/the-word-in-tech/f/d/researchers-determine-bright-magnetic-relationship-for-decaying-sunspots/) https://www.ohmtown.com/groups/hatchideas/f/d/american-airlines-passengers-report-unnerving-groans-and-moaning-noises-from-pa-system-that-sound-somewhere-between-an-orgasm-and-vomiting/ (https://www.ohmtown.com/groups/hatchideas/f/d/american-airlines-passengers-report-unnerving-groans-and-moaning-noises-from-pa-system-that-sound-somewhere-between-an-orgasm-and-vomiting/) https://www.ohmtown.com/groups/mobble/f/d/while-youre-in-the-air-pilots-key-partners-may-be-working-from-home/ (https://www.ohmtown.com/groups/mobble/f/d/while-youre-in-the-air-pilots-key-partners-may-be-working-from-home/) https://www.ohmtown.com/groups/mobble/f/d/watch-the-first-asteroid-defense-test-in-history-happen-live-in-space-tonight/ (https://www.ohmtown.com/groups/mobble/f/d/watch-the-first-asteroid-defense-test-in-history-happen-live-in-space-tonight/)

Today's blockchain and cryptocurrency news Bitcoin is up slightly at $18,746 Ethereum is up slightly at $1314 Binance Coin up slightly at $262 South Korean authorities ask Interpol or Red Notice for Do Kwon. Etherum Name Service says they've regained control of eth.link Hacker/s lifts 3M from vanity wallets. EVGA will stop making graphics cards. SEC/Ripple call for immediate ruling.

Gonzalez-Castillo v. Garland, No. 21-70112 (9th Cir. Aug. 31, 2022) ·       Interpol Red Notice; Article 13 of the Salvadoran Code; MS-13; serious reason to believe; serious nonpolitical crime; probable cause; burdens; Matter of W-E-R-B-; Salvadoran Art. 13; MS-13; IJ duty to develop the record Romero-Millan v. Garland, No. 16-73915 (9th Cir. Aug. 29, 2022) ·       law relating to a controlled substance; categorical approach; divisibility; certification; Arizona; A.R.S. § 13-3415; drug paraphernalia; A.R.S.§ 13-3408(A)(2); drug possession for sale Singh v. Garland, No. 19-73107 (9th Cir. Aug. 30, 2022) ·       changed country condition motion to reopen; credibility; Matter of F-S-N-; establish identity; Sikh; Mann Party; India  Casas v. Garland, No. 20-1739 (7th Cir. Aug. 29, 2022) ·       Reinstatement; reasonable fear interview; regulatory notice requirements; intent to reinstate; kidnapping; Mexico  Domingo-Mendez v. Garland, No, 21-1029 (1st Cir. Aug. 31, 2022) ·       non-LPR cancellation of removal; exceptional and extremely unusual hardship; clear error review; Guatemala Parada v. Garland, No. 19-60425 (5th Cir. Sept. 1, 2022) ·       Deficient NTA; stop time rule; motion to reopen; non-LPR cancellation of removal*Sponsors and friends of the podcast!Kurzban Kurzban Tetzeli and Pratt P.A.Immigration, serious injury, and business lawyers serving clients in Florida, California, and all over the world for over 40 years.Docketwise"Modern immigration software & case management"Want to become a patron?Click here to check out our Patreon Page!CONTACT INFORMATIONEmail: kgregg@kktplaw.comFacebook: @immigrationreviewInstagram: @immigrationreviewTwitter: @immreviewAbout your host!More episodes!Case notes!Top 15 immigration podcast in the U.S.!Featured in San Diego Voyager!DISCLAIMER:Immigration Review® is a podcast made available for educational purposes only. It does not provide legal advice. Rather, it offers general information and insights from publicly available immigration cases. By accessing and listening to the podcast, you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the host. The podcast should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed attorney in your state.MUSIC CREDITS:"Loopster," "Bass Vibes," "Chill Wave," and "Funk Game Loop" Kevin MacLeod - Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 4.0 Support the show

The National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) announced on Wednesday that it is acting in full compliance with domestic and international legal obligations in the extradition of Atul and Rajesh Gupta to South Africa. The Gupta brothers fled the country as the news surfaced during the State Capture Commission, led by Justice Raymond Zondo, that they allegedly looted State funds under the Jacob Zuma administration, dubbed the “nine wasted years”. The brothers were arrested as a result of an Interpol Red Notice issued at the request of the South African government earlier this year. The NPA explained that it is on track to finalise the process of extradition in close consultation with relevant authorities in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Interpol. “The diplomatic and political aspects are being dealt with in parallel by our colleagues in the Ministry, Department of Justice and Department of International Relations and Cooperation,” the NPA said. It has also submitted requests for provisional arrest warrants for the Gupta brothers, which the NPA said was a formality that needed to be complied with. In terms of the extradition treaty between South Africa and the UAE, South Africa has 60 days from the date of arrest to submit the formal extradition application. The NPA leadership expressed confidence in its team of experienced and highly skilled prosecutors working on the legal aspects of the Gupta extradition process. “We have previously explained why we will not be commenting on the legal dimensions of the case at this early stage, and this remains our position for important legal and case-specific reasons. However, we note with concern the widespread misinformation and speculation about how the NPA and its leadership are handling this complex legal process. While we recognise the public interest in this matter, we must focus on delivering on our constitutional mandate and responsibilities without distraction, and without fear or favour,” it said.

Minister in the Presidency Mondli Gungubele said on Thursday there is no guarantee that Atul and Rajesh Gupta will be brought to South Africa following their arrest in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Gungubele briefed the media on the outcomes of Wednesday's Cabinet meeting. “I wouldn't say there is a guarantee because that is not a simple process by the way,” he said. Gungubele explained while negotiations between the UAE and South Africa were under way, until they were concluded, the South African government did not know whether the Gupta brothers would be extradited to face charges. The brothers fled South Africa to Dubai following Jacob Zuma's recall as President in 2018. The government has said at least R500-billion was stolen during Zuma's nine-year presidency. The kingpins behind State capture during Zuma's Presidency were arrested as a result of an Interpol Red Notice issued at the request of the South African government earlier this year. “I will be surprised, taking into account the principles and the code of the Interpol Red Notice, because Interpol is to make sure that countries work together in dealing with crime, I will be surprised if it does not lead to [the Gupta brother's] coming to South Africa. I will also be surprised if they are not arrested on the basis of exactly what they did in South Africa,” said Gungubele. RAMAPHOSA'S FARM THEFT Gungubele said Cabinet had given the go-ahead to law enforcement agencies to investigate the theft of an alleged $4-million from President Cyril Ramaphosa's Limpopo farm. Former spy boss Arthur Fraser has laid criminal charges against Ramaphosa for allegedly contravening the Prevention of Organised Crime Act for failing to report the theft in 2020. Fraser alleged that $4-million was stolen and that the thieves were kidnapped, interrogated and paid to stay silent about the ordeal. Gungubele said Cabinet would deal with the matter when there was clarity on the outcomes. “We were briefed because already the matter of the robbery in the President's precinct is under the law enforcement agencies, they are actually investigating the matter. Financial institutions are investigating the matter and the approach is that let's leave it to all those institutions until we are clarified what the outcome is going be, then we can actually cross that bridge when we reach it,” said Gungubele. Economic Freedom Fighters leader Julius Malema has called on Ramaphosa to take a leave of absence and step aside as per the rules of the African National Congress, to allow for investigations into the matter. Public Protector Busisiwe Mkhwebane has started a probe into whether Ramaphosa violated the Executive Members Ethics Act after a complaint was laid against him by African Transformation Movement leader Vuyolwethu Zungula for allegedly breaching the code by not reporting the robbery.

Guests: Bernadine Benson is an associate professor, police practice (UNISA) Gary Eisenberg, immigration attorney See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Gonzalez Aguilar v. Garland, No. 18-9570 (10th Cir. Mar. 29, 2022)asylum; transgender woman; transgender adults; pattern or practice of persecution; Department of State country condition report; corruption; law enforcement efforts; unable or unwilling; corruption; HondurasMatter of S. Wong, 28 I&N Dec. 518 (BIA 2022)definition of conviction under INA § 101(a)(48)(A); constitutional floor; disorderly persons offense of theft by deception in violation of N.J. Stat. § 2C:20-4(a); CIMT; fraud; forgery in the second degree in violation of N.Y. Pen. L. § 170.10 Jama v. Garland, No. 21-1585 (8th Cir. Mar. 30, 2022)CAT; Awrtable tribe; pidgin Somali; Somali Christian; mental illness; Somalia Paredes Gonzales v. Garland, No. 20-2964 (8th Cir. Apr. 1, 2022)CAT; Interpol Red Notice; business disputes; prison conditions and torture; Bolivia Kakar v. USCIS, No. 20-1512 (2d Cir. Mar. 28, 2022)INA § 212(a)(3)(B)(iii)(V); asylum; terrorism; APA; weapons bar; material support bar; duress exception; Chenery; estoppel; res judicata; Taliban; Afghanistan  *Sponsors and friends of the podcast!Kurzban Kurzban Tetzeli and Pratt P.A.Immigration, serious injury, and business lawyers serving clients in Florida, California, and all over the world for over 40 years.Docketwise"Modern immigration software & case management"Want to become a patron?Click here to check out our Patreon Page!CONTACT INFORMATIONEmail: kgregg@kktplaw.comFacebook: @immigrationreviewInstagram: @immigrationreviewTwitter: @immreviewLearn about your host!More episodes!Case notes!Top 15 immigration podcast in the U.S.!DISCLAIMER:Immigration Review® is a podcast made available for educational purposes only. It does not provide legal advice. Rather, it offers general information and insights from publicly available immigration cases. By accessing and listening to the podcast, you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the host. The podcast should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed attorney in your state.MUSIC CREDITS:"Loopster," "Bass Vibes," "Chill Wave," and "Funk Game Loop" Kevin MacLeod - Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 4.0 Support the show (https://www.patreon.com/immigrationreview)

The Two hitmen in the Jimmy Sandhu murder case in Phuket have been living in fear in Canada since being exposed by the Royal Thai Police on February 12th last after an Interpol Red Notice was sought for the pair following the cold-blooded killing on February 4th last. One has already been arrested in Alberta on February 20th but the evidence collected by police in Thailand has led to Canadian police opening their own conspiracy to murder probe which could see those who paid for the hit and the two gunmen face justice on Canadian soil.https://www.thaiexaminer.com/thai-news-foreigners/2022/03/01/canadian-hitmen-suicidal-as-justice-looms/James Morris reports from Phuket, Edmonton and Vancouver.

[2:16] Germain v. U.S. Att'y General, No. 20-11419 (11th Cir. Aug. 18, 2021)aggravated felony; INA § 101(a)(43)(P); relating to document fraud; 18 U.S.C. § 1546(a); cancellation of removal;[9:22] Lopez-Marroquin v. Garland, No. 18-72922 (9th Cir. Aug. 18, 2021)Cal. Veh. Code § 10851(a); categorical approach; divisibility; aggravated felony; 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(G); Duenas-Alvarez v. Holder; Mathis v. United States[16:59] Guerrier v. Garland, No. 20-70115 (9th Cir. Aug. 16, 2021) jurisdiction; credible fear determination; expedited removal; colorable constitutional claim; due process; DHS v. Thuraissigiam[24:16] Flores-Rodriguez v. Garland, No. 19-70177 (9th Cir. Aug. 16, 2021)False claim to U.S. citizenship; INA § 212(a)(6)(C)(ii); adjustment of status; due process; prejudice[31:41] Dai v. Garland, No. 15-70776 (9th Cir. Aug. 20, 2021)Garland v. Dai; adverse credibility; presumption of credibility; deemed credible; persuasiveness[34:15] Liang v. Garland, No. 18-2257 (2d Cir. Aug. 19, 2021)Asylum; withholding of removal; Convention Against Torture; credibility; factual omission; factual inconsistency; substantial evidence[42:18] Sharma v. Garland, No. 20-70238 (9th Cir. Aug. 17, 2021)Asylum; withholding of removal; reasonable fear of persecution; Convention Against Torture; voluntary departure; jurisdiction[46:29] Villalobos Sura v. Garland, No. 20-71839 (9th Cir. Aug. 17, 2021)Withholding of removal; serious nonpolitical crime bar; probable cause; INTERPOL Red Notice; Convention Against Torture; government acquiescence; El Salvador[53:09] Plancarte Sauceda v. Garland, No. 19-73312 (9th Cir. Aug. 20, 2021) particular social group; immutable characteristic; asylum; withholding of removal; Convention Against Torture; government acquiescence; venue*Sponsors and friends of the podcast!Kurzban Kurzban Tetzeli and Pratt P.A.www.kktplaw.com/Immigration, serious injury, and business lawyers serving clients in Florida, California, and all over the world for over 40 years.Docketwisewww.docketwise.com/immigration-review"Modern immigration software & case management"DISCLAIMER: Immigration Review® is a podcast made available for educational purposes only. It does not provide specific legal advice. Rather, the Immigration Review® podcast offers general information and insights regarding recent immigration cases from publicly available sources. By accessing and listening to the podcast, you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the podcast host. The Immigration Review® podcast should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state. MUSIC CREDITS: "Loopster," "Bass Vibes," "Chill Wave," and "Funk Game Loop" Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com) Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 4.0 License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.Support the show (https://www.patreon.com/immigrationreview)

Der EuGH hat vor kurzem entschieden, dass das europäische Verbot der Doppelbestrafung einer Festnahme entgegenstehen kann, die ein außereuropäischer Staat über ein Interpol-Ersuchen verfolgt – sofern ein Gericht festgestellt hat, dass dieses Verbot zugunsten der Betroffenen eingreift. Bislang liefert die deutsche Rechtsordnung aber keinen Rechtsbehelf, um an eine entsprechende „Bescheinigung“ zu gelangen. In der neuen Folge des Criminal Compliance Podcasts erfahren Sie, welche Folgen die Entscheidung des EuGH für die EU-Mitgliedsstaaten und die Praxis bringt und was der EuGH hierbei zur Datenspeicherung entschieden hat. Dr. Christian Rosinus liefert dabei auch einen Überblick zu einigen der wichtigsten Begriffe des internationalen Wirtschaftsstrafrechts, wie dem der Interpol Red Notice und des transnationalen Strafklageverbrauchs.

Fate, misfortune and opportunity entangle three rivals in a quick-paced suspense thriller.CEO Suzanne Simpson fends off accusations of corporate money laundering on two continents as a global pandemic wreaks havoc on Multima Supermarkets. Fugitive Howard Knight flees from the Caribbean to Asia, trying desperately to elude both an Interpol Red Notice and a dangerous criminal outfit called The Organization.Fidelia Morales stakes her role as head of a powerful criminal element on an outrageous cyber scheme to steal millions from corporations around the globeSupport this show http://supporter.acast.com/houseofmysteryradio. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Good Morning Monaco Tuesday, January 12, 2021 published by NEWS.MC Subscribe to our daily email newsletter SBM whistleblower still the target of Monaco prosecutors Despite an international outcry, Jonathan Taylor, the lawyer who blew the whistle on corrupt practices at SBM Offshore in Monaco, remains the target of an Interpol Red Notice issued by Monaco. Additional coronavirus-related death in Monaco The death of a 72 year-old patient has been reported overnight from Sunday to Monday. Scientific Centre takes stake in coral pioneer The Monaco Scientific Centre (CSM) has taken a stake in the startup Coraliotech. A signing ceremony was held on Monday, January 11, to mark the financial agreement. Top Marques Monaco postponed until September Initially planned to take place in June, 2021, the Top Marques Monaco supercar show has been postponed and is now set to go ahead on September 1 to September 5. Copyright © 2020 NEWS SARL. All rights reserved. North East West South (NEWS) SARL. RCI: 20S08518 - NIS: 6312Z21974 --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/monacodailynews/message

#COVID19 Special Coverage: On this episode we have Mayer Mizrachi, the co-founder of Criptext. Criptext launched in 2014 originally as an encryption extension for Gmail that enabled users to have more security.In 2015 during a trip to Colombia with friends, Mayer was arrested and served an Interpol Red Notice. He served 5 months in a Colombian prison, and is to date unable to travel outside of Panama. The government’s interference with Mayer and the company’s private data is what inspired the company to shift focus and create today’s version of CripText which is an open source, end to end encrypted email service. Since then, the company has expanded and reached 100,000 users, and just a few weeks ago launched their revenue model. The transparency of the CripText model has encouraged other competing services to release their code publicly. In this conversation Mayer talks about what makes him uniquely wired to endure trying situations, how building legos helps him think, managing remote teams … from prison, the role he sees himself playing within his organization, how he approaches goal setting for Criptext, and so much more. This episode is definitely worth a listen.

We speak to Geoffrey Robertson QC of Doughty Street Chambers. He discusses the Interpol Red Notice for former CIA agent Anne Sacoolas, who is wanted for the death of Harry Dunn, a 19yo British teenager. He also discusses the case of Julian Assange and the birth of his 2 children, the coronavirus crisis in Britain, and his calls for a royal commission to investigate why Britain wasn’t sufficiently prepared, Brazilian President Bolsonaro’s response to the Covid-19 pandemic, legal rights in the UK during the pandemic and more! Finally, we speak to Richard Murray, chief executive of the King’s Fund, about the UK’s response to coronavirus. He discusses the impact of austerity on the country’s ability to cope with the effects of Covid-19, the lack of PPE for NHS frontline staff, the poor being hit hardest by the economic effects of coronavirus, how NHS privatisation has left the NHS worse off, whether he believes there has been a ‘war on the elderly’ due to the care homes crisis during coronavirus and more!

In this episode of The Tefo Mohapi Show, I speak to Marek Zmyslowski, a Polish entrepreneur who packed up his bags in 2013 to go to Nigeria to start an online travel startup. Having met with the Samwer brothers, founders of Rocket Internet, Marek was recruited to be the co-founder and Managing Director of Jovago in Nigeria. Jovago initially focussed on servicing customers in Nigeria with a vision to expand across Africa. However, things didn't go as Marek planned. Africa Internet Holdings (which would later rename and rebrand to Jumia), the group company under which Jovago and other Rocket Internet startups in Africa operated under, decided that it was best to consolidate all of its startups in Africa under the Jumia brand. Marek disagreed with this and it led to a fall-out with the executives at Rocket Internet and Africa Internet Holdings. However, that was the least of his troubles in doing business in Nigeria as he would later experience after having an Interpol Red Notice on his passport.

Launching your startup on a waterproof phone from a Colombian prison. It sounds like something out of a movie. But in this case, it's the true story of Criptext, an encrypted email service, founded by Panamanian entrepreneur Mayer Mizrachi. How did Mayer end up in a Colombian prison? What was it like? How did he continue working and keeping his team together? How did he raise money and even do an angel investment himself from his prison cell? We cover these questions and many more. In this podcast Mayer, tells his story in his own words. How he believes a $200k contract with the Panamanian government, political persecution and an unfortunate series of events led him to spend 5 months in a Colombian prison and the past two years stuck in Panama, unable to travel. Through it all, he's raised money and continues to build his business. We also talk about what he learned during his childhood overcoming a previously untreatable disease, studying in Europe and the US and of course encrypted email and what it's important. Lessons Learned Overcoming A Childhood Illness  Mayer was diagnosed with a rare illness that caused him to be on chemotherapy drugs from a very young age until he was 17. We talk about what it was like growing up in hospitals in a foreign country, what he learned and how this experience shaped him and how it might have helped prepare him for his Colombia prison stint. Launching A Startup From Colombian Prison Mayer was living in New York and decided to take a new years vacation with friends to Cartagena. When he got off the plane, he was arrested and presented with an Interpol Red Notice. We talk about how all of this happened, his time in a Colombian prison and why he thinks all of this happened. Panama claims he stole millions and bribed his way out of prison, Mayer says he had a $200k contract that he delivered, but a change in Presidential administration and some family connections led to political persecution. Opportunities For Doing Business in Latin America After such a difficult experience, maybe people would assume that Mayer wouldn't be interested in doing business in Latin America. But he's still bullish on opportunities and has made multiple angel investments in the region. We talk about some of the advantages and how it fits into the Magma Partners investment thesis. Show Notes: 2:30 - What are you working in Panama? 4:15 - Do you think that there's a potential security cluster for tech in Panama? 6:23 - How did you get interest in Cyber Security? 10:30 - Growing up in Panama 11:23 - Mayer's childhood illness, getting better, living in London 13:23 - What would you say if anything that you learned or that you used or that changed your perspective that is still with you today based on that childhood? 15:20 - What did you do after your came out of the hospital? 17:19 - Where did you study? 19:30 - What did your family think about taking an entrepreneurship path? 21:40 - The start of Mayer's story about Colombia Prison 28:40 - Getting arrested in Colombia on an Interpol Red Notice 31:25 - Mayer tells stories about what it was like in a Colombian maximum security prison 37:45 - What is your favorite story from prison? 49:38 - What do you think happened that Panama and Colombia went after you? 54:26 - Why Mayer ended up back in Panama 58:06 - You are taking a risk by telling the story like this, aren't you? 1:00:08 - Issues and potential solutions for keeping your communication secure 1:02:51 - What's next for Mayer and Criptext 1:04:27 - How did you keep the team together while you were in prison? 1:09:14 - Do you have any advice for why people should  look at Latin America? 1:12:33 - Some advantages for operating and investing in Latin America 1:13:43 - Books Mayer recommends 1:17:55 - Advice Mayer would give to his younger self Links: Original Forbes Coverage Forbes Follow up Coverage

Bill Browder (@Billbrowder) pioneered a brand-new market after the fall of The Iron Curtain while making powerful enemies -- including Vladimir Putin. He is the author of Red Notice: A True Story of High Finance, Murder, and One Man's Fight for Justice. "I made a vow on that morning to Sergei Magnitsky's memory, to his family, and to myself, that I was going to go after the people who killed him and make sure that they face justice." -Bill Browder What We Discuss with Bill Browder: How someone who grew up in a family of communist academics became one of today's most successful capitalists. How Bill Browder saw and continues to see and profit from opportunities that others discount as foolish. How Russian oligarchs rip off and defraud minority and foreign shareholders. How an Interpol Red Notice could mean arrest and extradition to Russia to face torture. Who was Sergei Magnitsky, and how is Bill seeking justice for his murder by the Russian state? And much more... Sign up for Six-Minute Networking -- our free networking and relationship development mini course -- at jordanharbinger.com/course! Like this show? Please leave us a review here -- even one sentence helps! Full show notes and resources can be found here.

Alison Azer continues to demand that Prime Minister Trudeau keep his promise to her, and do everything in his power to return Alison's Canadian children to her. Last weekend, Alison detailed how PM Trudeau is not only failing to keep his promise, but how his government is actively standing in the way of her four children being returned from Iran. The government appeared to be prepared to do exactly that following an INTERPOL Red Notice concerning the abduction of the Azer children. Alison Azer joins Roy Green, on the Roy Green Show... See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The latest in the U.S. election campaign - earlier in the week, Donald Trump told "Second Amendment people" they could deal with Hillary Clinton if she's elected POTUS and nominates left wing judges. Many in the Clinton campaign or its orbit interpreted Trump's statement as a direct threat to Clinton. On Wednesday, Trump announced Barack Obama to be "the founder of ISIS”. Meanwhile, Hillary Clinton had additional emails surface, as well as evidence which seems to indicate individuals who contributed generously to the Clinton Foundation were then granted favourable access to the State Department. Meanwhile, at a Clinton's rally in Orlando, the father of the gay nightclub mass murderer sat just behind Hillary Clinton and subsequently told media he'd been invited by the Clinton campaign. And last night in Milwaukee rioting after police shot and killed a black man who refused to drop a firearm. Is Trump too proactively supporting police?  Is Clinton kicking police to the curb? Guest: Dr. Zuhdi Jasser, former U.S. Navy Lt. Commander and founder of the American Islamic Forum for Democracy - How does a 2008 Democratic Party Super Delegate and 2016 Senator Bernie Sanders view election developments of this past week? Guest: Toby Condliffe, 2008 Democratic Party Super delegate - Alison Azer continues to demand Prime Minister Trudeau keep his promise to her and do everything in his power to return Alison's Canadian children to her. Last weekend, Alison detailed how Trudeau is not only failing to keep his promise, but how his government is actively standing in the way of her four children being returned from Iran, whose government appeared prepared to do exactly that following an INTERPOL Red Notice concerning the abduction of the Azer children. What has happened in the ensuing six days? The Government of Canada has abdicated responsibility to the Iranian government to act and is accusing (someone) of "grandstanding." Guest: Alison Azer - Last Sunday, a Calgary man called in while Roy was talking about the responsibility men have to protect wives, sisters, daughters, or mothers if they are victims of bullying and/or sexual harassment/abuse.  The man told us his wife is a Calgary police officer of 14 years and is on sick leave because of the bullying and harassment she experiences on the job. Roy asked him if he had gone to the police station to confront the officers bullying his wife, but he revealed that he too is a Calgary police officer. Guests: The caller/police officer (Tim) and his wife the police officer on leave because of bullying and sexual harassment (Amy) - The women police officers who have until now spoken about being sexually harassed/abused/assaulted and otherwise bullied have been mainly RCMP members and civilian employees. Now, Roy speaks with a male 28 year veteran of the RCMP (retired), who is also the media relations director for the Mounted Police Professional Association, the union for RCMP members. Rob Creasser does not dispute that sexual harassment and bullying happen in the RCMP. In fact, he saw it while he was a police officer.  Creasser blames this situation on RCMP Commissioner Bob Paulson and senior officers who turn a blind eye to the toxic workplace the RCMP has become. He argues the RCMP needs an accredited Association to assure transparency and accountability. He also calls for collective bargaining for the RCMP, without the right to strike. Guest: Rob Creasser See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Alison Azer continues to demand that Prime Minister Trudeau keep his promise to her, and do everything in his power to return Alison's Canadian children to her. Last weekend, Alison detailed how PM Trudeau is not only failing to keep his promise, but how his government is actively standing in the way of her four children being returned from Iran. The government appeared to be prepared to do exactly that following an INTERPOL Red Notice concerning the abduction of the Azer children. Alison Azer joins Roy Green, on the Roy Green Show... See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Vancouver police investigate a possible hate crime.  A man in Vancouver is punched in the mouth on a restaurant patio for speaking a foreign language (Turkish) and being shouted at by his alleged assailant that he was speaking in a “[bleep]ing foreign language.” The punch appears to have followed a vocal exchange at Starbucks on Thursday. The punched individual says he was not disturbing anyone. In the U.K. failure by immigrants to learn the English language means being cut off government services. Does it bother you to hear people in Canada not speaking English (or French)? Ever feel like telling them to speak English, or if they won't, then go back where they came from? In Quebec it's not unheard of for some Francophones to demand an Anglophone speak French. Are we that angry over the language spoken in public? - Global News reports a "notorious repeat convicted rapist has been released back onto the streets of Calgary. The release is terrifying one of his victims. James Alexander Pratt has been let out prison on 'statutory release according to the Parole Board of Canada. Parent has been in and out of prison for decades. In 1987, Parent broke into a house, tied up the woman owner and repeatedly raped her over a period of hours. That woman is now terrified at the news of Parent's release. How did Parent earn his release? The PBC quoted release is mandated by law when two-thirds of sentence is served. Calgary police opposed Parent's release. Guest: Scott Newark, former Alberta Crown Attorney and former senior policy advisor to the federal Solicitor General. - What do you do when you lose your significant other? What steps do you take to recover? How do you go about meeting someone new? Guest: Becky Aikman, author of the bestselling book "Saturday Night Widows: The Adventures of Six Friends Remaking their Lives” - the story of six young widows who decide to form a pack of friends and support each other as they rebuild their lives. - Alison Azer continues her desperate quest to be reunited with her four Canadian children. This after Prime Minister Justin Trudeau met personally with Alison in May and promised he would do everything he possibly can to reunite the mother with her four children, abducted by their father, Dr. Saren Azer, and for whom a Canada-wide warrant and Interpol warrant exist. Now Iran, which had arrested Saren Azer on the INTERPOL Red Notice issued by Canada has released Azer and cleared him because Canada did not follow up on its own INTERPOL Red Notice. Alison Azer is convinced Justin Trudeau lied to her and that his government intentionally refused to take an available step to see her illegally abducted Canadian children returned to her. Guest: Alison Azer - Pokémon Go craze - millions of children and adults are taking to the streets in pursuit of rare Pokémon. Before summer vacation children missed school, parents have missed work, others have abandoned careers to pursue Pokémon full time. What is going on? Are people increasingly blurring the line between virtual reality and reality? Guest: Dr. Mari Swingle, neurotherapist,clinical psychologist in Vancouver and author of "I-minds: How Cell Phones, Computers, Gaming and Social Media are Changing our Brains, our Behaviour,and the Evolution of our Species." See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In 2003, he began to appear in gay ographic movies, occasionally working as a dancer and escort. In 2005 he appeared as a pin-up model in an issue of Toronto's Fab magazine. In 2007, he was an unsuccessful competitor in a reality series CoverGuy and underwent numerous cosmetic surgeries, auditioning for a reality show Plastic Makes Perfect 2 in 2008 and set up at least 70 Facebook pages and 20 websites under various aliases. On May 25, 2012, an 11-minute video titled 1 Lunatic 1 Ice Pick was uploaded to a gore site, depicting a naked male tied to a bed frame being repeatedly stabbed with an ice pick and a knife, then dismembered, followed by acts of necrophilia and cannibalism. The perpetrator uses a knife and fork to cut off some of the flesh and gets a dog to chew on the body. On May 29, a janitor discovered the decomposing torso of Chinese foreign student Lin Jun inside a suitcase, in the alley behind an apartment building in Montreal. A package containing a foot was delivered to the national headquarters of the Conservative party, another containing a hand was addressed to the Liberal party. Packages containing severed limbs were later sent to elementary schools. Magnotta fled Canada, becoming the subject of an Interpol Red Notice and prompting an international manhunt. He was apprehended June 4, at an Internet cafe in Berlin reading news about himself. Materials promoting the video appeared online 10 days before the murder. The high profile trial in Montreal lasted 10 weeks. Luka Rocco Magnotta pleaded Not Guilty By Reason of Insanity. First Degree Murder or Insanity? PSYCHO KILLER SUPERSTAR-The Luka Magnotta Debacle-Dan Zupansky.