Podcasts about bankr

Ein Bankangestellter, der keinen Schmerz spüren kann, startet eine absurde Rettungsaktion gegen brutale Bankräuber – klingt erstmal nach einer überdrehten Action-Komödie, und genau das ist Mr. No Pain auch. In der neuen Folge des Filmmagazins besprechen wir einen Film, der zwischen Body Horror, Romcom und Amateur-John-Wick-Vibes pendelt – ohne dabei den Anspruch zu erheben, mehr sein zu wollen, als er ist: solide Unterhaltung mit einer interessanten Prämisse. Jack Quaid überzeugt als sympathischer Durchschnittstyp mit genetischer Schmerzunempfindlichkeit, der sich aus frischer Verliebtheit auf einen gefährlichen Pfad begibt. Warum „Mr. No Pain“ kein cineastisches Meisterwerk ist, aber dennoch Lust macht auf einen Filmabend ohne große Enttäuschung – das hört ihr in dieser Folge.

Fredag! I dagens rep blir det en oväntad dörrvakt, en väntad konferens, en snäll pappa, en olycksdrabbad tyngdlyftare, en sexig klippare och mycket annat. Har du ett skvaller som fler borde få höra? Maila det till kafferepetpod@gmail.comMissa inte vår månatliga systerpodd Cigarrummet. Bli prenumerant på www.underproduktion.se/cigarrummet10:24 - Deep throatern14:20 - En oväntad kedjereaktion28:40 - En natt på lasarettet 33:35 - Bankrånaren39:54 - Temporär shutdown43:54 - Jill Johnsons ben50:40 - Krüssningskonferens56:30 - Temu-Daniel och PET-flaskan1:05:30 - Snälla pappa Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Vil du kjøpe din første bolig, men er usikker på hele prosessen? Da er du kommet til riktig sted. Bankrådgiver i Sparebank1 Østlandet, Cecilie Sørli, deler hennes beste tips til ferske boligkjøpere. Dette er en annonsørepisode fra Sparebank1 Østlandet produsert av Schibsted Partnerstudio. Priseksempel: Eff.rente 5,70 %, 2 mill., o/25 år, kostnad kr 1.700.474, totalt kr 3.700.474.

Officer Kowalski gilt als der dümmste Polizist Kanadas und soll bald in den Ruhestand gehen. Bei einer Streife durch Toronto gelingt es ihm dennoch einen flüchtigen Bankräuber zu fassen. Allerdings lässt er ihn wieder laufen, als dieser ihm erzählt, er sei ein Fabelwesen und ihm einen Goldtopf verspricht. Kowalski wird zum Gespött der Kollegen und dennoch nimmt die Geschichte noch einen unfassbaren Lauf… Bastian Pastewka präsentiert: Kowalskis allerletzte Chance Von Leo Simpson Mit Horst Bollmann, Michael Habeck, Rainer Basedow u.a. Regie: Otto Düben BR 1981 Podcast-Tipp: Per Anhalter ins All – SciFi-Hörspiel-Klassiker https://1.ard.de/peranhalterinsall Hinweis: Der Hintergrund des Bildes wurde mit Hilfe von KI erstellt.

Die verflucht verblendeten Footballfans vom Fneakpod finden vielleicht sogar die ödeste, normalste Bankräubergeschichte spannend, wenn als Protagonist ein verkleideter Wolf und selbsternannter ChiefsAholic agiert. Uns hingegen hat es nur mäßig überzeugt, wenn auch weniger schmerzhaft bepeinlicht als Chantal im Märchenland. Stefan hat sich mit der zweiten Staffel von Night Agent seinem Lieblingsgenre hingegeben und Christoph vergleicht die Foundation-Serie mit der Buchvorlage, während Bob versucht, sein Auto ein erstes und letztes Mal am eigenen Stromanschluss zu laden.

Diese Folge wurde am Sonntag, 12. Januar 2025, live im Aschaffenburger Hofgarten Kabarett vor Publikum aufgezeichnet - als Teil der Reihe Jazz & Crime. Während seine Frau dachte, er ist auf Geschäftsreise, fährt ein Mann in einem Wohnmobil durch Deutschland und überfällt Banken - auch in Klingenberg im Kreis Miltenberg und in Lohr (Kreis Main-Spessart). Das Besondere: er bedrohte die Menschen zwar, war aber dabei höflich - und wünschte am Ende sogar noch einen schönen Tag. Sein Doppelleben flog dann vor Gericht auf. Main-Echo-Gerichtsreporterin Katrin Filthaus hat dies aus nächster Nähe verfolgt und berichtet über diese so skurrilen Fall. Hier lest ihr den Bericht über die Veranstaltung. Katrins Bericht über den Fall lest ihr hier. Zum Hofgarten Kabarett in Aschaffenburg geht es hier. Mehr zum Jazz & Crime-Festival. Foto: Armin Lerch Sprecher: Julian Goletzka

1UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXASHOUSTON DIVISIONIn re:INTRUM AB, et al.,1Debtors.Chapter 11Case No. 24-90575 (CML)(Jointly Administered)NOTICE OF APPEALPursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(a) and Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure 8002 and 8003,notice is hereby given that the Ad Hoc Committee of holders of 2025 notes issued by Intrum AB(the “AHC”) hereby appeals to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texasfrom (i) the Order Denying Motion of the Ad Hoc Committee of Holders of Intrum AB Notes Due2025 to Dismiss Chapter 11 Cases Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1112(b) and Federal Rule ofBankruptcy Procedure 1017(f)(1) (ECF No. 262) (the “Motion to Dismiss Order”) and (ii) theOrder (I) Approving Disclosure Statement and (II) Confirming Joint Prepackaged Chapter 11Plan of Intrum AB and Its Affiliated Debtor (Further Technical Modifications) (ECF No. 263) (the“Confirmation Order”). A copy of the Motion to Dismiss Order is attached as Exhibit A and acopy of the Confirmation Order is attached as Exhibit B. Additionally, the transcript of theBankruptcy Court's oral ruling accompanying the Motion to Dismiss Order and ConfirmationOrder (ECF No. 275) is attached as Exhibit C.Below are the names of all parties to this appeal and their respective counsel:1 The Debtors in these Chapter 11 Cases are Intrum AB and Intrum AB of Texas LLC. The Debtors'service address in these Chapter 11 Cases is 801 Travis Street, Ste 2101, #1312, Houston, TX 77002.Case 24-90575 Document 296 Filed in TXSB on 01/13/25 Page 1 of 62I. APPELLANTA. Name of Appellant:The members of the AHC include:Boundary Creek Master Fund LP; CF INT Holdings Designated Activity Company; CaiusCapital Master Fund; Diameter Master Fund LP; Diameter Dislocation Master Fund II LP; FirTree Credit Opportunity Master Fund, LP; MAP 204 Segregated Portfolio, a segregated portfolioof LMA SPC; Star V Partners LLC; and TQ Master Fund LP.Attorneys for the AHC:QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLPChristopher D. Porter (SBN 24070437)Joanna D. Caytas (SBN 24127230)Melanie A. Guzman (SBN 24117175)Cameron M. Kelly (SBN 24120936)700 Louisiana Street, Suite 3900Houston, TX 77002Telephone: (713) 221-7000Facsimile: (713) 221-7100Email: chrisporter@quinnemanuel.comjoannacaytas@quinnemanuel.commelanieguzman@quinnemanuel.comcameronkelly@quinnemanuel.com-and-Benjamin I. Finestone (admitted pro hac vice)Sascha N. Rand (admitted pro hac vice)Katherine A. Scherling (admitted pro hac vice)295 5th AvenueNew York, New York 10016Telephone: (212) 849-7000Facsimile: (212) 849-7100Email: benjaminfinestone@quinnemanuel.comsascharand@quinnemanuel.comkatescherling@quinnemanuel.comB. Positions of appellant in the adversary proceeding or bankruptcy case that isthe subject of this appeal:CreditorsCase 24-90575 Document 296 Filed in TXSB on 01/13/25 Page 2 of 63II. THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPEALA. Judgment, order, or decree appealed from:The Order Denying Motion of the Ad Hoc Committee of Holders of Intrum AB Notes Due2025 to Dismiss Chapter 11 Cases Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1112(b) and Federal Rule ofBankruptcy Procedure 1017(f)(1) (ECF No. 262); the Order (I) Approving Disclosure Statementand (II) Confirming Joint Prepackaged Chapter 11 Plan of Intrum AB and Its Affiliated Debtor(Further Technical Modifications) (ECF No. 263); and the December 31, 2024 Transcript of OralRuling Before the Honorable Christopher M. Lopez United States Bankruptcy Court Judge (ECFNo. 275).B. The date on which the judgment, order, or decree was entered:The Motion to Dismiss Order and the Confirmation Order were entered on December 31,2024. The Court issued its oral ruling accompanying the Motion to Dismiss Order and theConfirmation Order on December 31, 2024.III. OTHER PARTIES TO THIS APPEALIntrum AB and Intrum AB of Texas LLCMILBANK LLPDennis F. Dunne (admitted pro hac vice)Jaimie Fedell (admitted pro hac vice)55 Hudson YardsNew York, NY 10001Telephone: (212) 530-5000Facsimile: (212) 530-5219Email: ddunne@milbank.comjfedell@milbank.com–and–Andrew M. Leblanc (admitted pro hac vice)Melanie Westover Yanez (admitted pro hac vice)1850 K Street, NW, Suite 1100Washington, DC 20006Telephone: (202) 835-7500Facsimile: (202) 263-7586Email: aleblanc@milbank.commwyanez@milbank.com–and–PORTER HEDGES LLPJohn F. Higgins (SBN 09597500)Case 24-90575 Document 296 Filed in TXSB on 01/13/25 Page 3 of 64Eric D. Wade (SBN 00794802)M. Shane Johnson (SBN 24083263)1000 Main Street, 36th FloorHouston TX 77002Telephone: (713) 226-6000Facsimile: (713) 226-6248Email: jhiggins@porterhedges.comewade@porterhedges.comsjohnson@porterhedges.comIV. OTHER PARTIES THAT MAY HAVE AN INTEREST IN THIS APPEALThe following chart lists certain parties that are not parties to this appeal, but that may havean interest in the outcome of the case. These parties should be served with notice of this appealby the Debtors who are aware of their identities and best positioned to provide notice.All Other Creditors of the Debtors, Including, But Not Limited To:• Certain funds and accounts managed by BlackRock Investment Management (UK)Limited or its affiliates;• Capital Four;• Davidson Kempner European Partners, LLP;• Intermediate Capital Managers Limited;• Mandatum Asset Management Ltd;• H.I.G. Capital, LLC;• Spiltan Hograntefond; Spiltan Rantefond Sverige; and Spiltan Aktiefond Stabil;• The RCF SteerCo Group;• Swedbank AB (publ).Any Holder of Stock of the Debtors• Any holder of stock of the Debtors, including their successors and assigns.Case 24-90575 Document 296 Filed in TXSB on 01/13/25 Page 4 of 65Respectfully submitted this 13th day of January, 2025.QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &SULLIVAN, LLP/s/ Christopher D. PorterChristopher D. Porter (SBN 24070437)Joanna D. Caytas (SBN 24127230)Melanie A. Guzman (SBN 24117175)Cameron M. Kelly (SBN 24120936)700 Louisiana Street, Suite 3900Houston, TX 77002Telephone: (713) 221-7000Facsimile: (713) 221-7100Email: chrisporter@quinnemanuel.comjoannacaytas@quinnemanuel.commelanieguzman@quinnemanuel.comcameronkelly@quinnemanuel.com-and-Benjamin I. Finestone (admitted pro hac vice)Sascha N. Rand (admitted pro hac vice)Katherine A. Scherling (admitted pro hac vice)295 5th AvenueNew York, New York 10016Telephone: (212) 849-7000Facsimile: (212) 849-7100Email: benjaminfinestone@quinnemanuel.comsascharand@quinnemanuel.comkatescherling@quinnemanuel.comCOUNSEL FOR THE AD HOC COMMITTEE OFINTRUM AB 2025 NOTEHOLDERSCase 24-90575 Document 296 Filed in TXSB on 01/13/25 Page 5 of 6CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEI, Christopher D. Porter, hereby certify that on the 13th day of January, 2025, a copy ofthe foregoing document has been served via the Electronic Case Filing System for the UnitedStates Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas./s/ Christopher D. PorterBy: Christopher D. PorterCase 24-90575 Document 296 Filed in TXSB on 01/13/25 Page 6 of 6EXHIBIT ACase 24-90575 Document 296-1 Filed in TXSB on 01/13/25 Page 1 of 31IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURTFOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXASHOUSTON DIVISION)In re: ) Chapter 11)Intrum AB, et al.,1 ) Case No. 24-90575 (CML)))Jointly AdministeredDebtors. ))ORDER DENYING MOTION OF THE AD HOCCOMMITTEE OF HOLDERS OF INTRUM AB NOTES DUE 2025TO DISMISS CHAPTER 11 CASES PURSUANT TO 11 U.S.C. § 1112(B) ANDFEDERAL RULE OF BANKRUPTCY PROCEDURE 1017(F)(1)(Related to Docket No. 27)This matter, having come before the Court upon the Motion of the Ad Hoc Committee ofHolders of Intrum AB Notes Due 2025 to Dismiss Chapter 11 Cases Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §1112(b) and Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 1017(f)(1) [Docket No. 27] (the “Motion toDismiss”); and this Court having considered the Debtors' Objection to the Motion of the Ad HocCommittee of Holders of Intrum AB Notes Due 2025 to Dismiss Chapter 11 Cases Pursuant to 11U.S.C. § 1112(b) and Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 1017(f)(1) (the “Objection”) andany other responses or objections to the Motion to Dismiss; and this Court having jurisdiction overthis matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1334 and the Amended Standing Order; and this Court havingfound that this is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2); and this Court having foundthat it may enter a final order consistent with Article III of the United States Constitution; and thisCourt having found that the relief requested in the Objection is in the best interests of the Debtors'1 The Debtors in these Chapter 11 Cases are Intrum AB and Intrum AB of Texas LLC. The Debtors' serviceaddress in these Chapter 11 Cases is 801 Travis Street, STE 2101, #1312, Houston, TX 77002.United States Bankruptcy CourtSouthern District of TexasENTEREDDecember 31, 2024Nathan Ochsner, ClerkCCaassee 2 244-9-900557755 D Dooccuummeennt t2 29662-1 F Filieledd i nin T TXXSSBB o onn 1 021/3/113/2/245 P Paaggee 1 2 o of f2 32estates; and this Court having found that the Debtors' notice of the Objection and opportunity fora hearing on the Motion to Dismiss and Objection were appropriate and no other notice need beprovided; and this Court having reviewed the Motion to Dismiss and Objection and havingheard the statements in support of the relief requested therein at a hearing before this Court; andthis Court having determined that the legal and factual bases set forth in the Objectionestablish just cause for the relief granted herein; and upon all of the proceedings had beforethis Court; and after due deliberation and sufficient cause appearing therefor, it is HEREBYORDERED THAT:1. The Motion to Dismiss is Denied for the reasons stated at the December 31, 2024 hearing.2. This Court retains exclusive jurisdiction and exclusive venue with respect to allmatters arising from or related to the implementation, interpretation, and enforcement of this Order.DAeucegmubste 0r 23,1 2, 0210294CCaassee 2 244-9-900557755 D Dooccuummeennt t2 29662-1 F Filieledd i nin T TXXSSBB o onn 1 021/3/113/2/245 P Paaggee 2 3 o of f2 3EXHIBIT BCase 24-90575 Document 296-2 Filed in TXSB on 01/13/25 Page 1 of 135IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURTFOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXASHOUSTON DIVISION)In re: ) Chapter 11)Intrum AB et al.,1 ) Case No. 24-90575 (CML)))(Jointly Administered)Debtors. ))ORDER (I) APPROVINGDISCLOSURE STATEMENT AND(II) CONFIRMING JOINT PREPACKAGED CHAPTER 11PLAN OF INTRUM AB AND ITS AFFILIATEDDEBTOR (FURTHER TECHNICAL MODIFICATIONS)The above-captioned debtors and debtors in possession (collectively, the“Debtors”), having:a. entered into that certain Lock-Up Agreement, dated as of July 10, 2024 (asamended and restated on August 15, 2024, and as further modified,supplemented, or otherwise amended from time to time in accordance with itsterms, the “the Lock-Up Agreement”) and that certain Backstop Agreement,dated as of July 10, 2024, (as amended and restated on November 15, 2024 andas further modified, supplemented, or otherwise amended from time to time inaccordance with its terms), setting out the terms of the backstop commitmentsprovided by the Backstop Providers to backstop the entirety of the issuance ofNew Money Notes (as may be further amended, restated, amended and restated,modified or supplemented from time to time in accordance with the termsthereof, the “Backstop Agreement”) which set forth the terms of a consensualfinancial restructuring of the Debtors;b. commenced, on October 17, 2024, a prepetition solicitation (the “Solicitation”)of votes on the Joint Prepackaged Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization of IntrumAB and its Debtor Affiliate Pursuant to Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (asthe same may be further amended, modified and supplemented from time totime, the “Plan”), by causing the transmittal, through their solicitation andballoting agent, Kroll Restructuring Administration LLC (“Kroll”), to theholders of Claims entitled to vote on the Plan of, among other things: (i) the1 The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases are Intrum AB and Intrum AB of Texas LLC. The Debtors' serviceaddress in these chapter 11 cases is 801 Travis Street, STE 2102, #1312, Houston, TX 77002.United States Bankruptcy CourtSouthern District of TexasENTEREDDecember 31, 2024Nathan Ochsner, ClerkCCaassee 2 244-9-900557755 D Dooccuummeennt t2 29663-2 F Filieledd i nin T TXXSSBB o onn 1 021/3/113/2/245 P Paaggee 1 2 o of f1 133452Plan, (ii) the Disclosure Statement for Joint Prepackaged Chapter 11 Plan ofReorganization of Intrum AB and its Debtor Affiliate (as the same may befurther amended, modified and supplemented from time to time, the“Disclosure Statement”), and (iii) the Ballots and Master Ballot to vote on thePlan (the “Ballots”), (iv) the Affidavit of Service of Solicitation Materials[Docket No. 7];c. commenced on November 15, 2024 (the “Petition Date”), these chapter 11 cases(these “Chapter 11 Cases”) by filing voluntary petitions in the United StatesBankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas (the “Bankruptcy Court”or the “Court”) for relief under chapter 11 of title 11 of the United States Code(the “Bankruptcy Code”);d. Filed on November 15, 2024, the Affidavit of Service of Solicitation Materials[Docket No. 7] (the “Solicitation Affidavit”);e. Filed, on November 16, 2024 the Joint Prepackaged Chapter 11 Plan ofReorganization of Intrum AB and its Debtor Affiliate Pursuant to Chapter 11of the Bankruptcy Code (Technical Modifications) [Docket No. 16] and theDisclosure Statement for Joint Prepackaged Chapter 11 Plan of Intrum AB andits Debtor Affiliate [Docket No. 17];f. Filed on November 16, 2024, the Declaration of Andrés Rubio in Support of ofthe Debtors' Chapter 11 Petitions and First Day Motions [Docket No. 14] (the“First Day Declaration”);g. Filed on November 17, 2024, the Declaration of Alex Orchowski of KrollRestructuring Administration LLC Regarding the Solicitation of Votes andTabulation of Ballots Case on the Joint Prepackaged Chapter 11 Plan ofReorganization of Intrum AB and its Debtor Affiliate Pursuant to Chapter 11of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 18] (the “Voting Declaration,” andtogether with the Plan, the Disclosure Statement, the Ballots, and theSolicitation Affidavit, the “Solicitation Materials”);h. obtained, on November 19, 2024, the Order(I) Scheduling a Combined Hearingon (A) Adequacy of the Disclosure Statement and (B) Confirmation of the Plan,(II) Approving Solicitation Procedures and Form and Manner of Notice ofCommencement, Combined Hearing, and Objection Deadline, (III) FixingDeadline to Object to Disclosure Statement and Plan, (IV) Conditionally (A)Directing the United States Trustee Not to Convene Section 341 Meeting ofCreditors and (B) Waiving Requirement to File Statements of Financial Affairsand Schedules of Assets and Liabilities, and (V) Granting Related Relief[Docket No. 71] (the “Scheduling Order”), which, among other things: (i)approved the prepetition solicitation and voting procedures, including theConfirmation Schedule (as defined therein); (ii) conditionally approved theDisclosure Statement and its use in the Solicitation; and (iii) scheduled theCombined Hearing on December 16, 2024, at 1:00 p.m. (prevailing CentralCCaassee 2 244-9-900557755 D Dooccuummeennt t2 29663-2 F Filieledd i nin T TXXSSBB o onn 1 021/3/113/2/245 P Paaggee 2 3 o of f1 133453Time) to consider the final approval of the Disclosure Statement and theconfirmation of the Plan (the “Combined Hearing”);i. served, through Kroll, on November 20, 2025, on all known holders of Claimsand Interests, the U.S. Trustee and certain other parties in interest, the Noticeof: (I) Commencement of Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Cases; (II) Hearing on theDisclosure Statement and Confirmation of the Plan, and (III) Certain ObjectionDeadlines (the “Combined Hearing Notice”) as evidence by the Affidavit ofService [Docket No. 160];j. caused, on November 25 and 27, 2024, the Combined Hearing Notice to bepublished in the New York Times (national and international editions) and theFinancial Times (international edition), as evidenced by the Certificate ofPublication [Docket No. 148];k. Filed and served, on December 10, 2024, the Plan Supplement for the Debtors'Joint Prepackaged Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization [Docket 165];l. Filed on December 10, 2024, the Declaration of Jeffrey Kopa in Support ofConfirmation of the Joint Prepackaged Plan of Reorganization of Intrum ABand its Debtor Affiliate Pursuant to Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code [DocketNo. 155];m. Filed on December 14, 2024, the:i. Debtors' Memorandum of Law in Support of an Order: (I) Approving, on aFinal Basis, Adequacy of the Disclosure Statement; (II) Confirming theJoint Prepackaged Plan of Reorganization; and (III) Granting Related Relief[Docket No. 190] (the “Confirmation Brief”);ii. Declaration of Andrés Rubio in Support of Confirmation of the JointPrepackaged Plan of Reorganization of Intrum AB and its Debtor Affiliate.[Docket No. 189] (the “Confirmation Declaration”); andiii. Joint Prepackaged Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization of Intrum AB and itsDebtor Affiliate Pursuant to Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (FurtherTechnical Modifications) [Docket No. 191];n. Filed on December 18, 2024, the Joint Prepackaged Chapter 11 Plan ofReorganization of Intrum AB and its Debtor Affiliate Pursuant to Chapter 11of the Bankruptcy Code (Further Technical Modifications) [Docket No. 223];CCaassee 2 244-9-900557755 D Dooccuummeennt t2 29663-2 F Filieledd i nin T TXXSSBB o onn 1 021/3/113/2/245 P Paaggee 3 4 o of f1 133454WHEREAS, the Court having, among other things:a. set December 12, 2024, at 4:00 p.m. (prevailing Central Time) as the deadlinefor Filing objection to the adequacy of the Disclosure Statement and/orConfirmation2 of the Plan (the “Objection Deadline”);b. held, on December 16, 2024 at 1:00 p.m. (prevailing Central Time) [andcontinuing through December 17, 2024], the Combined Hearing;c. heard the statements, arguments, and any objections made at the CombinedHearing;d. reviewed the Disclosure Statement, the Plan, the Ballots, the Plan Supplement,the Confirmation Brief, the Confirmation Declaration, the SolicitationAffidavit, and the Voting Declaration;e. overruled (i) any and all objections to approval of the Disclosure Statement, thePlan, and Confirmation, except as otherwise stated or indicated on the record,and (ii) all statements and reservations of rights not consensually resolved orwithdrawn, unless otherwise indicated; andf. reviewed and taken judicial notice of all the papers and pleadings Filed(including any objections, statement, joinders, reservations of rights and otherresponses), all orders entered, and all evidence proffered or adduced and allarguments made at the hearings held before the Court during the pendency ofthese cases;NOW, THEREFORE, it appearing to the Bankruptcy Court that notice of theCombined Hearing and the opportunity for any party in interest to object to the DisclosureStatement and the Plan having been adequate and appropriate as to all parties affected or to beaffected by the Plan and the transactions contemplated thereby, and the legal and factual bases setforth in the documents Filed in support of approval of the Disclosure Statement and Confirmationand other evidence presented at the Combined Hearing establish just cause for the relief grantedherein; and after due deliberation thereon and good cause appearing therefor, the BankruptcyCourt makes and issues the following findings of fact and conclusions of law, and orders for thereasons stated on the record at the December 31, 2024 ruling on plan confirmation;2 Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein have meanings given to them in the Plan and/or theDisclosure Statement. The rules of interpretation set forth in Article I.B of the Plan apply to this CombinedOrder.CCaassee 2 244-9-900557755 D Dooccuummeennt t2 29663-2 F Filieledd i nin T TXXSSBB o onn 1 021/3/113/2/245 P Paaggee 4 5 o of f1 133455I. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAWIT IS HEREBY FOUND AND DETERMINED THAT:A. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law.1. The findings and conclusions set forth herein and in the record of theCombined Hearing constitute the Bankruptcy Court's findings of fact and conclusions of law underRule 52 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, as made applicable herein by Bankruptcy Rules7052 and 9014. To the extent any of the following conclusions of law constitute findings of fact,or vice versa, they are adopted as such.B. Jurisdiction, Venue, Core Proceeding.2. This Court has jurisdiction over these Chapter 11 Cases pursuant to28 U.S.C. § 1334. Venue of these proceedings and the Chapter 11 Cases in this district is properpursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1408 and 1409. This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 157(b)(2) and this Court may enter a final order hereon under Article III of the United StatesConstitution.C. Eligibility for Relief.3. The Debtors were and continue to be entities eligible for relief under section109 of the Bankruptcy Code and the Debtors were and continue to be proper proponents of thePlan under section 1121(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.D. Commencement and Joint Administration of the Chapter 11 Cases.4. On the Petition Date, the Debtors commenced the Chapter 11 Cases. OnNovember 18, 2024, the Court entered an order [Docket No. 51] authorizing the jointadministration of the Chapter 11 Case in accordance with Bankruptcy Rule 1015(b). The Debtorshave operated their businesses and managed their properties as debtors in possession pursuant toCCaassee 2 244-9-900557755 D Dooccuummeennt t2 29663-2 F Filieledd i nin T TXXSSBB o onn 1 021/3/113/2/245 P Paaggee 5 6 o of f1 133456sections 1107(a) and 1108 of the Bankruptcy Code. No trustee, examiner, or statutory committeehas been appointed in these Chapter 11 Cases.E. Adequacy of the Disclosure Statement.5. The Disclosure Statement and the exhibits contained therein (i) containssufficient information of a kind necessary to satisfy the disclosure requirements of applicablenonbankruptcy laws, rules and regulations, including the Securities Act; and (ii) contains“adequate information” as such term is defined in section 1125(a)(1) and used in section1126(b)(2) of the Bankruptcy Code, with respect to the Debtors, the Plan and the transactionscontemplated therein. The Filing of the Disclosure Statement satisfied Bankruptcy Rule 3016(b).The injunction, release, and exculpation provisions in the Plan and the Disclosure Statementdescribe, in bold font and with specific and conspicuous language, all acts to be enjoined andidentify the Entities that will be subject to the injunction, thereby satisfying Bankruptcy Rule3016(c).F. Solicitation.6. As described in and evidenced by the Voting Declaration, the Solicitationand the transmittal and service of the Solicitation Materials were: (i) timely, adequate, appropriate,and sufficient under the circumstances; and (ii) in compliance with sections 1125(g) and 1126(b)of the Bankruptcy Code, Bankruptcy Rules 3017 and 3018, the applicable Local Bankruptcy Rules,the Scheduling Order and all applicable nonbankruptcy rules, laws, and regulations applicable tothe Solicitation, including the registration requirements under the Securities Act. The SolicitationMaterials, including the Ballots and the Opt Out Form (as defined below), adequately informedthe holders of Claims entitled to vote on the Plan of the procedures and deadline for completingand submitting the Ballots.CCaassee 2 244-9-900557755 D Dooccuummeennt t2 29663-2 F Filieledd i nin T TXXSSBB o onn 1 021/3/113/2/245 P Paaggee 6 7 o of f1 1334577. The Debtors served the Combined Hearing Notice on the entire creditormatrix and served the Opt Out Form on all Non-Voting Classes. The Combined Hearing Noticeadequately informed Holders of Claims or Interests of critical information regarding voting on (ifapplicable) and objecting to the Plan, including deadlines and the inclusion of release, exculpation,and injunction provisions in the Plan, and adequately summarized the terms of the Third-PartyRelease. Further, because the form enabling stakeholders to opt out of the Third-Party Release (the“Opt Out Form”) was included in both the Ballots and the Opt Out Form, every known stakeholder,including unimpaired creditors was provided with the means by which the stakeholders could optout of the Third-Party Release. No further notice is required. The period for voting on the Planprovided a reasonable and sufficient period of time and the manner of such solicitation was anappropriate process allowing for such holders to make an informed decision.G. Tabulation.8. As described in and evidenced by the Voting Declaration, (i) the holders ofClaims in Class 3 (RCF Claims) and Class 5 (Notes Claims) are Impaired under the Plan(collectively, the “Voting Classes”) and have voted to accept the Plan in the numbers and amountsrequired by section 1126 of the Bankruptcy Code, and (ii) no Class that was entitled to vote on thePlan voted to reject the Plan. All procedures used to tabulate the votes on the Plan were in goodfaith, fair, reasonable, and conducted in accordance with the applicable provisions of theBankruptcy Code, the Bankruptcy Rules, the Local Rules, the Disclosure Statement, theScheduling Order, and all other applicable nonbankruptcy laws, rules, and regulations.H. Plan Supplement.9. On December 10, 2024, the Debtors Filed the Plan Supplement with theCourt. The Plan Supplement (including as subsequently modified, supplemented, or otherwiseCCaassee 2 244-9-900557755 D Dooccuummeennt t2 29663-2 F Filieledd i nin T TXXSSBB o onn 1 021/3/113/2/245 P Paaggee 7 8 o of f1 133458amended pursuant to a filing with the Court), complies with the terms of the Plan, and the Debtorsprovided good and proper notice of the filing in accordance with the Bankruptcy Code, theBankruptcy Rules, the Scheduling Order, and the facts and circumstances of the Chapter 11 Cases.All documents included in the Plan Supplement are integral to, part of, and incorporated byreference into the Plan. No other or further notice is or will be required with respect to the PlanSupplement. Subject to the terms of the Plan and the Lock-Up Agreement, and only consistenttherewith, the Debtors reserve the right to alter, amend, update, or modify the Plan Supplementand any of the documents contained therein or related thereto, in accordance with the Plan, on orbefore the Effective Date.I. Modifications to the Plan.10. Pursuant to section 1127 of the Bankruptcy Code, the modifications to thePlan described or set forth in this Combined Order constitute technical or clarifying changes,changes with respect to particular Claims by agreement with holders of such Claims, ormodifications that do not otherwise materially and adversely affect or change the treatment of anyother Claim or Interest under the Plan. These modifications are consistent with the disclosurespreviously made pursuant to the Disclosure Statement and Solicitation Materials, and notice ofthese modifications was adequate and appropriate under the facts and circumstances of the Chapter11 Cases. In accordance with Bankruptcy Rule 3019, these modifications do not require additionaldisclosure under section 1125 of the Bankruptcy Code or the resolicitation of votes under section1126 of the Bankruptcy Code, and they do not require that holders of Claims or Interests beafforded an opportunity to change previously cast acceptances or rejections of the Plan.Accordingly, the Plan is properly before this Court and all votes cast with respect to the Plan priorto such modification shall be binding and shall apply with respect to the Plan.CCaassee 2 244-9-900557755 D Dooccuummeennt t2 29663-2 F Filieledd i nin T TXXSSBB o onn 1 021/3/113/2/245 P Paaggee 8 9 o of f1 133459J. Objections Overruled.11. Any resolution or disposition of objections to Confirmation explained orotherwise ruled upon by the Court on the record at the Confirmation Hearing is herebyincorporated by reference. All unresolved objections, statements, joinders, informal objections,and reservations of rights are hereby overruled on the merits.K. Burden of Proof.12. The Debtors, as proponents of the Plan, have met their burden of provingthe elements of sections 1129(a) and 1129(b) of the Bankruptcy Code by a preponderance of theevidence, the applicable evidentiary standard for Confirmation. Further, the Debtors have proventhe elements of sections 1129(a) and 1129(b) by clear and convincing evidence. Each witness whotestified on behalf of the Debtors in connection with the Confirmation Hearing was credible,reliable, and qualified to testify as to the topics addressed in his testimony.L. Compliance with the Requirements of Section 1129 of the BankruptcyCode.13. The Plan complies with all applicable provisions of section 1129 of theBankruptcy Code as follows:a. Section 1129(a)(1) – Compliance of the Plan with Applicable Provisions of theBankruptcy Code.14. The Plan complies with all applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code,including sections 1122 and 1123, as required by section 1129(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code.i. Section 1122 and 1123(a)(1) – Proper Classification.15. The classification of Claims and Interests under the Plan is proper under theBankruptcy Code. In accordance with sections 1122(a) and 1123(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code,Article III of the Plan provides for the separate classification of Claims and Interests at each Debtorinto Classes, based on differences in the legal nature or priority of such Claims and Interests (otherCaCsaes e2 42-49-09507557 5 D oDcoucmumenetn 2t 9266-32 FFiilleedd iinn TTXXSSBB oonn 1021//3113//2245 PPaaggee 91 0o fo 1f 3143510than Administrative Claims, Professional Fee Claims, and Priority Tax Claims, which areaddressed in Article II of the Plan and Unimpaired, and are not required to be designated asseparate Classes in accordance with section 1123(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code). Valid business,factual, and legal reasons exist for the separate classification of the various Classes of Claims andInterests created under the Plan, the classifications were not implemented for any improperpurpose, and the creation of such Classes does not unfairly discriminate between or among holdersof Claims or Interests.16. In accordance with section 1122(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, each Class ofClaims or Interests contains only Claims or Interests substantially similar to the other Claims orInterests within that Class. Accordingly, the Plan satisfies the requirements of sections 1122(a),1122(b), and 1123(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Codeii. Section 1123(a)(2) – Specifications of Unimpaired Classes.17. Article III of the Plan specifies that Claims and Interests in the classesdeemed to accept the Plan are Unimpaired under the Plan. Holders of Intercompany Claims andIntercompany Interests are either Unimpaired and conclusively presumed to have accepted thePlan, or are Impaired and deemed to reject (the “Deemed Rejecting Classes”) the Plan, and, ineither event, are not entitled to vote to accept or reject the Plan. In addition, Article II of the Planspecifies that Administrative Claims and Priority Tax Claims are Unimpaired, although the Plandoes not classify these Claims. Accordingly, the Plan satisfies the requirements of section1123(a)(2) of the Bankruptcy Code.CCaassee 2 244-9-900557755 D Dooccuummeennt t2 29663-2 F Fileiledd i nin T TXXSSBB o onn 1 021/3/113/2/245 P Paaggee 1 101 o of f1 1334511iii. Section 1123(a)(3) – Specification of Treatment of Voting Classes18. Article III.B of the Plan specifies the treatment of each Voting Class underthe Plan – namely, Class 3 and Class 5. Accordingly, the Plan satisfies the requirements of section1123(a)(3) of the Bankruptcy Code.iv. Section 1123(a)(4) – No Discrimination.19. Article III of the Plan provides the same treatment to each Claim or Interestin any particular Class, as the case may be, unless the holder of a particular Claim or Interest hasagreed to a less favorable treatment with respect to such Claim or Interest. Accordingly, the Plansatisfies the requirements of section 1123(a)(4) of the Bankruptcy Code.v. Section 1123(a)(5) – Adequate Means for Plan Implementation.20. The Plan and the various documents included in the Plan Supplementprovide adequate and proper means for the Plan's execution and implementation, including: (a)the general settlement of Claims and Interests; (b) the restructuring of the Debtors' balance sheetand other financial transactions provided for by the Plan; (c) the consummation of the transactionscontemplated by the Plan, the Lock-Up Agreement, the Restructuring Implementation Deed andthe Agreed Steps Plan and other documents Filed as part of the Plan Supplement; (d) the issuanceof Exchange Notes, the New Money Notes, and the Noteholder Ordinary Shares pursuant to thePlan; (e) the amendment of the Intercreditor Agreement; (f) the amendment of the FacilityAgreement; (g) the amendment of the Senior Secured Term Loan Agreement; (h) theconsummation of the Rights Offering in accordance with the Plan, Rights Offering Documentsand the Lock-Up Agreement; (i) the granting of all Liens and security interests granted orconfirmed (as applicable) pursuant to, or in connection with, the Facility Agreement, the ExchangeNotes Indenture, the New Money Notes Indenture, the amended Intercreditor Agreement and theCCaassee 2 244-9-900557755 D Dooccuummeennt t2 29663-2 F Fileiledd i nin T TXXSSBB o onn 1 021/3/113/2/245 P Paaggee 1 112 o of f1 1334512Senior Secured Term Loan Agreement pursuant to the New Security Documents (including anyLiens and security interests granted or confirmed (as applicable) on the Reorganized Debtors'assets); (j) the vesting of the assets of the Debtors' Estates in the Reorganized Debtors; (k) theconsummation of the corporate reorganization contemplated by the Plan, the Lock-Up Agreement,the Agreed Steps Plan and the Master Reorganization Agreement (as defined in the RestructuringImplementation Deed); and (l) the execution, delivery, filing, or recording of all contracts,instruments, releases, and other agreements or documents in furtherance of the Plan. Accordingly,the Plan satisfies the requirements of section 1123(a)(5) of the Bankruptcy Codevi. Section 1123(a)(6) – Non-Voting Equity Securities.21. The Company's organizational documents in accordance with the SwedishCompanies Act, Ch. 4, Sec 5 and the Plan prohibit the issuance of non-voting securities as of theEffective Date to the extent required to comply with section 1123(a)(6) of the Bankruptcy Code.Accordingly, the Plan satisfies the requirements of section 1123(a)(6) of the Bankruptcy Code.vii. Section 1123(a)(7) – Directors, Officers, and Trustees.22. The manner of selection of any officer, director, or trustee (or any successorto and such officer, director, or trustee) of the Reorganized Debtors will be determined inaccordance with the existing organizational documents, which is consistent with the interests ofcreditors and equity holders and with public policy. Accordingly, the Plan satisfies therequirements of section 1123(a)(7) of the Bankruptcy Code.b. Section 1123(b) – Discretionary Contents of the Plan23. The Plan contains various provisions that may be construed as discretionarybut not necessary for Confirmation under the Bankruptcy Code. Any such discretionary provisionCCaassee 2 244-9-900557755 D Dooccuummeennt t2 29663-2 F Fileiledd i nin T TXXSSBB o onn 1 021/3/113/2/245 P Paaggee 1 123 o of f1 1334513complies with section 1123(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and is not inconsistent with the applicableprovisions of the Bankruptcy Code. Thus, the Plan satisfies section 1123(b).i. Section 1123(b)(1) – Impairment/Unimpairment of Any Class of Claims orInterests24. Article III of the Plan impairs or leaves unimpaired, as the case may be,each Class of Claims or Interests, as contemplated by section 1123(b)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code.ii. Section 1123(b)(2) – Assumption and Rejection of Executory Contracts andUnexpired Leases25. Article V of the Plan provides for the assumption of the Debtors' ExecutoryContracts and Unexpired Leases as of the Effective Date unless such Executory Contract orUnexpired Lease: (a) is identified on the Rejected Executory Contract and Unexpired Lease List;(b) has been previously rejected by a Final Order; (c) is the subject of a motion to reject ExecutoryContracts or Unexpired Leases that is pending on the Confirmation Date; or (4) is subject to amotion to reject an Executory Contract or Unexpired Lease pursuant to which the requestedeffective date of such rejection is after the Effective Date. Thus, the Plan satisfies section1123(b)(2).iii. Compromise and Settlement26. In accordance with section 1123(b)(3)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code andBankruptcy Rule 9019, and in consideration for the distributions and other benefits provided underthe Plan, the provisions of the Plan constitute a good-faith compromise of all Claims, Interests,and controversies relating to the contractual, legal, and subordination rights that all holders ofClaims or Interests may have with respect to any Allowed Claim or Interest or any distribution tobe made on account of such Allowed Claim or Interest. Such compromise and settlement is theproduct of extensive arm's-length, good faith negotiations that, in addition to the Plan, resulted inCCaassee 2 244-9-900557755 D Dooccuummeennt t2 29663-2 F Fileiledd i nin T TXXSSBB o onn 1 021/3/113/2/245 P Paaggee 1 134 o of f1 1334514the execution of the Lock-Up Agreement, which represents a fair and reasonable compromise ofall Claims, Interests, and controversies and entry into which represented a sound exercise of theDebtors' business judgment. Such compromise and settlement is fair, equitable, and reasonableand in the best interests of the Debtors and their Estates.27. The releases of the Debtors' directors and officers are an integral componentof the settlements and compromises embodied in the Plan. The Debtors' directors and officers: (a)made a substantial and valuable contribution to the Debtors' restructuring, including extensive preandpost-Petition Date negotiations with stakeholder groups, and ensured the uninterruptedoperation of the Debtors' businesses during the Chapter 11 Cases; (b) invested significant timeand effort to make the restructuring a success and maximize the value of the Debtors' businessesin a challenging operating environment; (c) attended and, in certain instances, testified atdepositions and Court hearings; (d) attended and participated in numerous stakeholder meetings,management meetings, and board meetings related to the restructuring; (e) are entitled toindemnification from the Debtors under applicable non-bankruptcy law, organizationaldocuments, and agreements; (f) invested significant time and effort in the preparation of the Lock-Up Agreement, the Plan, Disclosure Statement, all supporting analyses, and the numerous otherpleadings Filed in the Chapter 11 Cases, thereby ensuring the smooth administration of the Chapter11 Cases; and (g) are entitled to all other benefits under any employment contracts existing as ofthe Petition Date. Litigation by the Debtors or other Releasing Parties against the Debtors'directors and officers would be a distraction to the Debtors' business and restructuring and woulddecrease rather than increase the value of the estates. The releases of the Debtors' directors andofficers contained in the Plan have the consent of the Debtors and the Releasing Parties and are inthe best interests of the estates.CCaassee 2 244-9-900557755 D Dooccuummeennt t2 29663-2 F Fileiledd i nin T TXXSSBB o onn 1 021/3/113/2/245 P Paaggee 1 145 o of f1 1334515iv. Debtor Release28. The releases of claims and Causes of Action by the Debtors, ReorganizedDebtors, and their Estates described in Article VIII.C of the Plan in accordance with section1123(b) of the Bankruptcy Code (the “Debtor Release”) represent a valid exercise of the Debtors'business judgment under Bankruptcy Rule 9019. The Debtors' or the Reorganized Debtors' pursuitof any such claims against the Released Parties is not in the best interests of the Estates' variousconstituencies because the costs involved would outweigh any potential benefit from pursuingsuch claims. The Debtor Release is fair and equitable and complies with the absolute priority rule.29. The Debtor Release is (a) an integral part of the Plan, and a component ofthe comprehensive settlement implemented under the Plan; (b) in exchange for the good andvaluable consideration provided by the Released Parties; (c) a good faith settlement andcompromise of the claims and Causes of Action released by the Debtor Release; (d) materiallybeneficial to, and in the best interests of, the Debtors, their Estates, and their stakeholders, and isimportant to the overall objectives of the Plan to finally resolve certain Claims among or againstcertain parties in interest in the Chapter 11 Cases; (e) fair, equitable, and reasonable; (f) given andmade after due notice and opportunity for hearing; and (g) a bar to any Debtor asserting any claimor Cause of Action released by the Debtor Release against any of the Released Parties. Theprobability of success in litigation with respect to the released claims and Causes of Action, whenweighed against the costs, supports the Debtor Release. With respect to each of these potentialCauses of Action, the parties could assert colorable defenses and the probability of success isuncertain. The Debtors' or the Reorganized Debtors' pursuit of any such claims or Causes ofAction against the Released Parties is not in the best interests of the Estates or the Debtors' variousCCaassee 2 244-9-900557755 D Dooccuummeennt t2 29663-2 F Fileiledd i nin T TXXSSBB o onn 1 021/3/113/2/245 P Paaggee 1 156 o of f1 1334516constituencies because the costs involved would likely outweigh any potential benefit frompursuing such claims or Causes of Action30. Holders of Claims and Interests entitled to vote have overwhelmingly votedin favor of the Plan, including the Debtor Release. The Plan, including the Debtor Release, wasnegotiated before and after the Petition Date by sophisticated parties represented by able counseland advisors, including the Consenting Creditors. The Debtor Release is therefore the result of ahard fought and arm's-length negotiation process conducted in good faith.31. The Debtor Release appropriately offers protection to parties thatparticipated in the Debtors' restructuring process, including the Consenting Creditors, whoseparticipation in the Chapter 11 Cases is critical to the Debtors' successful emergence frombankruptcy. Specifically, the Released Parties, including the Consenting Creditors, madesignificant concessions and contributions to the Chapter 11 Cases, including, entering into theLock-Up Agreement and related agreements, supporting the Plan and the Chapter 11 Cases, andwaiving or agreeing to impair substantial rights and Claims against the Debtors under the Plan (aspart of the compromises composing the settlement underlying the revised Plan) in order tofacilitate a consensual reorganization and the Debtors' emergence from chapter 11. The DebtorRelease for the Debtors' directors and officers is appropriate because the Debtors' directors andofficers share an identity of interest with the Debtors and, as previously stated, supported and madesubstantial contributions to the success of the Plan, the Chapter 11 Cases, and operation of theDebtors' business during the Chapter 11 Cases, actively participated in meetings, negotiations, andimplementation during the Chapter 11 Cases, and have provided other valuable consideration tothe Debtors to facilitate the Debtors' successful reorganization and continued operation.CCaassee 2 244-9-900557755 D Dooccuummeennt t2 29663-2 F Fileiledd i nin T TXXSSBB o onn 1 021/3/113/2/245 P Paaggee 1 167 o of f1 133451732. The scope of the Debtor Release is appropriately tailored under the factsand circumstances of the Chapter 11 Cases. In light of, among other things, the value provided bythe Released Parties to the Debtors' Estates and the critical nature of the Debtor Release to thePlan, the Debtor Release is appropriate.v. Release by Holders of Claims and Interests33. The release by the Releasing Parties (the “Third-Party Release”), set forthin Article VIII.D of the Plan, is an essential provision of the Plan. The Third-Party Release is: (a)consensual as to those Releasing Parties that did not specifically and timely object or properly optout from the Third-Party Release; (b) within the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court pursuant to28 U.S.C. § 1334; (c) in exchange for the good and valuable consideration provided by theReleased Parties; (d) a good faith settlement and compromise of the claims and Causes of Actionreleased by the Third-Party Release; (e) materially beneficial to, and in the best interests of, theDebtors, their Estates, and their stakeholders, and is important to the overall objectives of the Planto finally resolve certain Claims among or against certain parties in interest in the Chapter 11Cases; (f) fair, equitable, and reasonable; (g) given and made after due notice and opportunity forhearing; (h) appropriately narrow in scope given that it expressly excludes, among other things,any Cause of Action that is judicially determined by a Final Order to have constituted actual fraud,willful misconduct, or gross negligence; (i) a bar to any of the Releasing Parties asserting anyclaim or Cause of Action released by the Third-Party Release against any of the Released Parties;and (j) consistent with sections 105, 524, 1123, 1129, and 1141 and other applicable provisions ofthe Bankruptcy Code.34. The Third-Party Release is an integral part of the agreement embodied inthe Plan among the relevant parties in interest. Like the Debtor Release, the Third-Party ReleaseCCaassee 2 244-9-900557755 D Dooccuummeennt t2 29663-2 F Fileiledd i nin T TXXSSBB o onn 1 021/3/113/2/245 P Paaggee 1 178 o of f1 1334518facilitated participation in both the Debtors' Plan and the chapter 11 process generally. The Third-Party Release is instrumental to the Plan and was critical in incentivizing parties to support thePlan and preventing significant and time-consuming litigation regarding the parties' respectiverights and interests. The Third-Party Release was a core negotiation point in connection with thePlan and instrumental in developing the Plan that maximized value for all of the Debtors'stakeholders and kept the Debtors intact as a going concern. As such, the Third-Party Releaseappropriately offers certain protections to parties who constructively participated in the Debtors'restructuring process—including the Consenting Creditors (as set forth above)—by, among otherthings, facilitating the negotiation and consummation of the Plan, supporting the Plan and, in thecase of the Backstop Providers, committing to provide new capital to facilitate the Debtors'emergence from chapter 11. Specifically, the Notes Ad Hoc Group proposed and negotiated thepari passu transaction that is the basis of the restructuring proposed under the Plan and provideda much-needed deleveraging to the Debtors' business while taking a discount on their Claims (inexchange for other consideration).35. Furthermore, the Third-Party Release is consensual as to all parties ininterest, including all Releasing Parties, and such parties in interest were provided notice of thechapter 11 proceedings, the Plan, the deadline to object to confirmation of the Plan, and theCombined Hearing and were properly informed that all holders of Claims against or Interests inthe Debtors that did not file an objection with the Court in the Chapter 11 Cases that included anexpress objection to the inclusion of such holder as a Releasing Party under the provisionscontained in Article VIII of the Plan would be deemed to have expressly, unconditionally,generally, individually, and collectively consented to the release and discharge of all claims andCauses of Action against the Debtors and the Released Parties. Additionally, the release provisionsCCaassee 2 244-9-900557755 D Dooccuummeennt t2 29663-2 F Fileiledd i nin T TXXSSBB o onn 1 021/3/113/2/245 P Paaggee 1 189 o of f1 1334519of the Plan were conspicuous, emphasized with boldface type in the Plan, the DisclosureStatement, the Ballots, and the applicable notices. Except as set forth in the Plan, all ReleasingParties were properly informed that unless they (a) checked the “opt out” box on the applicableBallot or opt-out form and returned the same in advance of the Voting Deadline, as applicable, or(b) timely Filed an objection to the releases contained in the Plan that was not resolved beforeentry of this Confirmation Order, they would be deemed to have expressly consented to the releaseof all Claims and Causes of Action against the Released Parties.36. The Ballots sent to all holders of Claims and Interests entitled to vote, aswell as the notice of the Combined Hearing sent to all known parties in interest (including thosenot entitled to vote on the Plan), unambiguously provided in bold letters that the Third-PartyRelease was contained in the Plan.37. The scope of the Third-Party Release is appropriately tailored under thefacts and circumstances of the Chapter 11 Cases, and parties in interest received due and adequatenotice of the Third-Party Release. Among other things, the Plan provides appropriate and specificdisclosure with respect to the claims and Causes of Action that are subject to the Third-PartyRelease, and no other disclosure is necessary. The Debtors, as evidenced by the VotingDeclaration and Certificate of Publication, including by providing actual notice to all knownparties in interest, including all known holders of Claims against, and Interests in, any Debtor andpublishing notice in international and national publications for the benefit of unknown parties ininterest, provided sufficient notice of the Third-Party Release, and no further or other notice isnecessary. The Third-Party Release is designed to provide finality for the Debtors, theReorganized Debtors and the Released Parties regarding the parties' respective obligations underthe Plan. For the avoidance of doubt, and notwithstanding anything to the contrary, anyparty who timely opted-out of the Third-Party Release is not bound by the Third-PartyRelease.CCaassee 2 244-9-900557755 D Dooccuummeennt t2 29663-2 F Fileiledd i nin T TXXSSBB o onn 1 021/3/113/2/245 P Paaggee 1 290 o of f1 133452038. The Third-Party Release is specific in language, integral to the Plan, andgiven for substantial consideration. The Releasing Parties were given due and adequate notice ofthe Third-Party Release, and thus the Third-Party Release is consensual under controllingprecedent as to those Releasing Parties that did not specifically and timely object. In light of,among other things, the value provided by the Released Parties to the Debtors' Estates and theconsensual and critical nature of the Third-Party Release to the Plan, the Third-Party Release isappropriatevi. Exculpation.39. The exculpation described in Article VIII.E of the Plan (the “Exculpation”)is appropriate under applicable law, including In re Highland Capital Mgmt., L.P., 48 F. 4th 419(5th Cir. 2022), because it was supported by proper evidence, proposed in good faith, wasformulated following extensive good-faith, arm's-length negotiations with key constituents, and isappropriately limited in scope.40. No Entity or Person may commence or continue any action, employ anyprocess, or take any other act to pursue, collect, recover or offset any Claim, Interest, debt,obligation, or Cause of Action relating or reasonably likely to relate to any act or commission inconnection with, relating to, or arising out of a Covered Matter (including one that alleges theactual fraud, gross negligence, or willful misconduct of a Covered Entity), unless expresslyauthorized by the Bankruptcy Court after (1) it determines, after a notice and a hearing, such Claim,Interest, debt, obligation, or Cause of Action is colorable and (2) it specifically authorizes suchEntity or Person to bring such Claim or Cause of Action. The Bankruptcy Court shall have soleand exclusive jurisdiction to determine whether any such Claim, Interest, debt, obligation or Causeof Action is colorable and, only to the extent legally permissible and as provided for in Article XI,CCaassee 2 244-9-900557755 D Dooccuummeennt t2 29663-2 F Fileiledd i nin T TXXSSBB o onn 1 021/3/113/2/245 P Paaggee 2 201 o of f1 1334521shall have jurisdiction to adjudicate such underlying colorable Claim, Interest, debt, obligation, orCause of Action.vii. Injunction.41. The injunction provisions set forth in Article VIII.F of the Plan are essentialto the Plan and are necessary to implement the Plan and to preserve and enforce the discharge,Debtor Release, the Third-Party Release, and the Exculpation provisions in Article VIII of thePlan. The injunction provisions are appropriately tailored to achieve those purposes.viii. Preservation of Claims and Causes of Action.42. Article IV.L of the Plan appropriately provides for the preservation by theDebtors of certain Causes of Action in accordance with section 1123(b) of the Bankruptcy Code.Causes of Action not released by the Debtors or exculpated under the Plan will be retained by theReorganized Debtors as provided by the Plan. The Plan is sufficiently specific with respect to theCauses of Action to be retained by the Debtors, and the Plan and Plan Supplement providemeaningful disclosure with respect to the potential Causes of Action that the Debtors may retain,and all parties in interest received adequate notice with respect to such retained Causes of Action.The provisions regarding Causes of Action in the Plan are appropriate and in the best interests ofthe Debtors, their respective Estates, and holders of Claims or Interests. For the avoidance of anydoubt, Causes of Action released or exculpated under the Plan will not be retained by theReorganized Debtors.c. Section 1123(d) – Cure of Defaults43. Article V.D of the Plan provides for the satisfaction of Cure Claimsassociated with each Executory Contract and Unexpired Lease to be assumed in accordance withsection 365(b)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code. Any monetary defaults under each assumed ExecutoryCCaassee 2 244-9-900557755 D Dooccuummeennt t2 29663-2 F Fileiledd i nin T TXXSSBB o onn 1 021/3/113/2/245 P Paaggee 2 212 o of f1 1334522Contract or Unexpired Lease shall be satisfied, pursuant to section 365(b)(1) of the BankruptcyCode, by payment of the default amount in Cash on the Effective Date, subject to the limitationsdescribed in Article V.D of the Plan, or on such other terms as the parties to such ExecutoryContracts or Unexpired Leases may otherwise agree. Any Disputed Cure Amounts will bedetermined in accordance with the procedures set forth in Article V.D of the Plan, and applicablebankruptcy and nonbankruptcy law. As such, the Plan provides that the Debtors will Cure, orprovide adequate assurance that the Debtors will promptly Cure, defaults with respect to assumedExecutory Contracts and Unexpired Leases in accordance with section 365(b)(1) of theBankruptcy Code. Thus, the Plan complies with section 1123(d) of the Bankruptcy Code.d. Section 1129(a)(2) – Compliance of the Debtors and Others with the ApplicableProvisions of the Bankruptcy Code.44. The Debtors, as proponents of the Plan, have complied with all applicableprovisions of the Bankruptcy Code as required by section 1129(a)(2) of the Bankruptcy Code,including sections 1122, 1123, 1124, 1125, 1126, and 1128, and Bankruptcy Rules 3017, 3018,and 3019.e. Section 1129(a)(3) – Proposal of Plan in Good Faith.45. The Debtors have proposed the Plan in good faith, in accordance with theBankruptcy Code requirements, and not by any means forbidden by law. In determining that thePlan has been proposed in good faith, the Court has examined the totality of the circumstancesfiling of the Chapter 11 Cases, including the formation of Intrum AB of Texas LLC (“IntrumTexas”), the Plan itself, and the process leading to its formulation. The Debtors' good faith isevident from the facts and record of the Chapter 11 Cases, the Disclosure Statement, and the recordof the Combined Hearing and other proceedings held in the Chapter 11 CasesCCaassee 2 244-9-900557755 D Dooccuummeennt t2 29663-2 F Fileiledd i nin T TXXSSBB o onn 1 021/3/113/2/245 P Paaggee 2 223 o of f1 133452346. The Plan (including the Plan Supplement and all other documents necessaryto effectuate the Plan) is the product of good faith, arm's-length negotiations by and among theDebtors, the Debtors' directors and officers and the Debtors' key stakeholders, including theConsenting Creditors and each of their respective professionals. The Plan itself and the processleading to its formulation provide independent evidence of the Debtors' and such other parties'good faith, serve the public interest, and assure fair treatment of holders of Claims or Interests.Consistent with the overriding purpose of chapter 11, the Debtors Filed the Chapter 11 Cases withthe belief that the Debtors were in need of reorganization and the Plan was negotiated and proposedwith the intention of accomplishing a successful reorganization and maximizing stakeholder value,and for no ulterior purpose. Accordingly, the requirements of section 1129(a)(3) of the BankruptcyCode are satisfied.f. Section 1129(a)(4) – Court Approval of Certain Payments as Reasonable.47. Any payment made or to be made by the Debtors, or by a person issuingsecurities or acquiring property under the Plan, for services or costs and expenses in connectionwith the Chapter 11 Cases, or in connection with the Plan and incident to the Chapter 11 Cases,has been approved by, or is subject to the approval of, the Court as reasonable. Accordingly, thePlan satisfies the requirements of section 1129(a)(4).g. Section 1129(a)(5)—Disclosure of Directors and Officers and Consistency with theInterests of Creditors and Public Policy.48. The identities of or process for appointment of the Reorganized Debtors'directors and officers proposed to serve after the Effective Date were disclosed in the PlanSupplement in advance of the Combined Hearing. Accordingly, the Debtors have satisfied therequirements of section 1129(a)(5) of the Bankruptcy Code.CCaassee 2 244-9-900557755 D Dooccuummeennt t2 29663-2 F Fileiledd i nin T TXXSSBB o onn 1 021/3/113/2/245 P Paaggee 2 234 o of f1 1334524h. Section 1129(a)(6)—Rate Changes.49. The Plan does not contain any rate changes subject to the jurisdiction of anygovernmental regulatory commission and therefore will not require governmental regulatoryapproval. Therefore, section 1129(a)(6) of the Bankruptcy Code does not apply to the Plan.i. Section 1129(a)(7)—Best Interests of Holders of Claims and Interests.50. The liquidation analysis attached as Exhibit D to the Disclosure Statementand the other evidence in support of the Plan that was proffered or adduced at the CombinedHearing, and the facts and circumstances of the Chapter 11 Cases are (a) reasonable, persuasive,credible, and accurate as of the dates such analysis or evidence was prepared, presented orproffered; (b) utilize reasonable and appropriate methodologies and assumptions; (c) have not beencontroverted by other evidence; and (d) establish that each holder of Allowed Claims or Interestsin each Class will recover as much or more value under the Plan on account of such Claim orInterest, as of the Effective Date, than the amount such holder would receive if the Debtors wereliquidated on the Effective Date under chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code or has accepted the Plan.As a result, the Debtors have demonstrated that the Plan is in the best interests of their creditorsand equity holders and the requirements of section 1129(a)(7) of the Bankruptcy Code are satisfied.j. Section 1129(a)(8)—Conclusive Presumption of Acceptance by UnimpairedClasses; Acceptance of the Plan by Certain Voting Classes.51. The classes deemed to accept the Plan are Unimpaired under the Plan andare deemed to have accepted the Plan pursuant to section 1126(f) of the Bankruptcy Code. EachVoting Class voted to accept the Plan. For the avoidance of doubt, however, even if section1129(a)(8) has not been satisfied with respect to all of the Debtors, the Plan is confirmable becausethe Plan does not discriminate unfairly and is fair and equitable with respect to the Voting Classesand thus satisfies section 1129(b) of the Bankruptcy Code with respect to such Classes as describedCCaassee 2 244-9-900557755 D Dooccuummeennt t2 29663-2 F Fileiledd i nin T TXXSSBB o onn 1 021/3/113/2/245 P Paaggee 2 245 o of f1 1334525further below. As a result, the requirements of section 1129(b) of the Bankruptcy Code are alsosatisfied.k. Section 1129(a)(9)—Treatment of Claims Entitled to Priority Pursuant to Section507(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.52. The treatment of Administrative Claims, Professional Fee Claims, andPriority Tax Claims under Article II of the Plan satisfies the requirements of, and complies in allrespects with, section 1129(a)(9) of the Bankruptcy Code.l. Section 1129(a)(10)—Acceptance by at Least One Voting Class.53. As set forth in the Voting Declaration, all Voting Classes overwhelminglyvoted to accept the Plan. As such, there is at least one Voting Class that has accepted the Plan,determined without including any acceptance of the Plan by any insider (as defined by theBankruptcy Code), for each Debtor. Accordingly, the requirements of section 1129(a)(10) of theBankruptcy Code are satisfied.m. Section 1129(a)(11)—Feasibility of the Plan.54. The Plan satisfies section 1129(a)(11) of the Bankruptcy Code. Thefinancial projections attached to the Disclosure Statement as Exhibit D and the other evidencesupporting the Plan proffered or adduced by the Debtors at or before the Combined Hearing: (a)is reasonable, persuasive, credible, and accurate as of the dates such evidence was prepared,presented, or proffered; (b) utilize reasonable and appropriate methodologies and assumptions; (c)has not been controverted by other persuasive evidence; (d) establishes that the Plan is feasibleand Confirmation of the Plan is not likely to be followed by liquidation or the need for furtherfinancial reorganization; (e) establishes that the Debtors will have sufficient funds available tomeet their obligations under the Plan and in the ordinary course of business—including sufficientamounts of Cash to reasonably ensure payment of Allowed Claims that will receive CashCCaassee 2 244-9-900557755 D Dooccuummeennt t2 29663-2 F Fileiledd i nin T TXXSSBB o onn 1 021/3/113/2/245 P Paaggee 2 256 o of f1 1334526distributions pursuant to the terms of the Plan and other Cash payments required under the Plan;and (f) establishes that the Debtors or the Reorganized Debtors, as applicable, will have thefinancial wherewithal to pay any Claims that accrue, become payable, or are allowed by FinalOrder following the Effective Date. Accordingly, the Plan satisfies the requirements of section1129(a)(11) of the Bankruptcy Code.n. Section 1129(a)(12)—Payment of Statutory Fees.55. Article XII.C of the Plan provides that all fees payable pursuant to section1930(a) of the Judicial Code, as determined by the Court at the Confirmation Hearing inaccordance with section 1128 of the Bankruptcy Code, will be paid by each of the applicableReorganized Debtors for each quarter (including any fraction of a quarter) until the Chapter 11Cases are converted, dismissed, or closed, whichever occurs first. Accordingly, the Plan satisfiesthe requirements of section 1129(a)(12) of the Bankruptcy Code.o. Section 1129(a)(13)—Retiree Benefits.56. Pursuant to section 1129(a)(13) of the Bankruptcy Code, and as provided inArticle IV.K of the Plan, the Reorganized Debtors will continue to pay all obligations on accountof retiree benefits (as such term is used in section 1114 of the Bankruptcy Code) on and after theEffective Date in accordance with applicable law. As a result, the requirements of section1129(a)(13) of the Bankruptcy Code are satisfied.p. Sections 1129(a)(14), (15), and (16)—Domestic Support Obligations, Individuals,and Nonprofit Corporations.57. The Debtors do not owe any domestic support obligations, are notindividuals, and are not nonprofit corporations. Therefore, sections 1129(a)(14), 1129(a)(15), and1129(a)(16) of the Bankruptcy Code do not apply to the Chapter 11 Cases.CCaassee 2 244-9-900557755 D Dooccuummeennt t2 29663-2 F Fileiledd i nin T TXXSSBB o onn 1 021/3/113/2/245 P Paaggee 2 267 o of f1 1334527q. Section 1129(b)—Confirmation of the Plan Over Nonacceptance of VotingClasses.58. No Classes rejected the Plan, and section 1129(b) is not applicable here,but even if it were, the Plan may be confirmed pursuant to section 1129(b)(1) of the BankruptcyCode because the Plan is fair and equitable with respect to the Deemed Rejecting Classes. ThePlan has been proposed in good faith, is reasonable, and meets the requirements and all VotingClasses have voted to accept the Plan. The treatment of Intercompany Claims and IntercompanyInterests under the Plan provides for administrative convenience does not constitute a distributionunder the Plan on account of suc

Ich habe Dir letztes Jahr erklärt warum man mit den wahren Basics starten sollte, um nicht alle Probleme im Krafttraining zu bekomme, dafür aber richtigen Progress als Athlete oder Everyday Athlete. Jetzt gibt es die Fortsetzung! DIESE ÜBUNGEN sind die PROGRESSION und damit der Schlüssel für noch besseres Krafttraining in 2025! JETZT mehr Infos und Input, um Dich als Athlete oder Coach besser zu machen: https://sebastiankaindl.substack.com/ 01:32 - Die wahren Basics - keine Langhantel? 02:19 - Mit diesen Problemen kommen (Everyday) Athletes zu mir 04:37 - DESHALB MUSST du mehr machen als die wahren Basics 06:51 - Diesen Fehler machen viele beim variieren! 09:09 - Wir gehen die wahren Basics durch 10:22 - Die Fortsetzung- Das sind die Progressionen 11:32 - Kein normaler Squat? besser Boxsquats! 15:00 - Dieser Squatfehler hat einen alten ersetzt 16:33 - RFE Squats - deshalb müssen alle darunter leiden 17:58 - Unilateral Hingen - damit würde ich beginnen 19:58 - Deshlab bilateral starten, dann unilateral hingen! 20:47 - Normale Deadlifts? 22:20 - Damit haben alle bei den wahren Basics gerechnet - kommt aber erst jetzt 23:55 - Ein Gegenpol zum Bankrücken 24:49 - Mehr Möglichkeiten! explosiv-plyometrisch-maximal 25:58 - Eine Erweiterung des horizontalen Drückens?? Sollte jeder können! 27:54 - Fast schon Bodybuilding! 29:33 - Doch Langhantel!? 30:13 - Endlich ein Klassiker - Hypertrophie für den Rücken! 32:52 - Ziehen für Maximalkraft 35:21 - Der absolute Klassiker - Musst Du können, musst Du machen 37:15 - Perfekt für Deine Strength Goals! 38:09 - Beachte diese Tipps für Dein Krafttraining 2025! 40:29 - Oha es wird kontrovers 41:09 - Du wählst das Thema der nächsten Folgen! 41:37 - Es kommt neues für EUCH! 42:45 - Mehr Inhalte für Dich NICHT VERPASSEN! --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

„Heat“ aus dem Jahr 1995 ist ein intensiver Thriller von Michael Mann, der die verhängnisvolle Rivalität zwischen einem genialen Bankräuber (Robert De Niro) und einem besessenen LAPD-Detective (Al Pacino) zeigt. Der Film besticht durch komplexe Charaktere, atemberaubende Actionszenen und eine packende Erzählung über Loyalität, Einsamkeit und moralische Grauzonen. Ein Meisterwerk des Crime-Genres!

„HEAT“ aus dem Jahr 1995 ist ein intensiver Thriller von Michael Mann, der die verhängnisvolle Rivalität zwischen einem genialen Bankräuber (Robert De Niro) und einem besessenen LAPD-Detective (Al Pacino) zeigt. Der Film besticht durch komplexe Charaktere, atemberaubende Actionszenen und eine packende Erzählung über Loyalität, Einsamkeit und moralische Grauzonen. Ein Meisterwerk des Crime-Genres!

Ein Bankräuber, der kurz vor seinem großen Coup einschläft, Bisse auf der Weihnachtsfeier und ein paar weitere Fälle aus der Steiermark und Kärnten, die sich zu oder rund um Weihnachten zugetragen haben.Mit David Knes und Thomas Cik.In der Folge besprochen wurde auch:„Ich bin der Boss der Grabräuber“: Die Sargentführung in Kärnten, eine delikt-Live-Folge aus Klagenfurt.Zu Banküberfällen: In der Folge „Der Showdown“ sprechen wir über einen, an dem zwei Banküberfälle stattfanden und warum diese Art des Verbrechens kaum noch vorkommt.„Pumpgun-Ronny“, der Marathonläufer, der als Bankräuber allen davonlief, sein Fall diente als Vorlage des Romans „Der Räuber“ von Martin Prinz und wurde auch verfilmt.

Einen kuriosen Fall könnt ihr bei unserem Live-Podcast im Rahmen der Reihe "Jazz and Crime" im Aschaffenburger Hofgarten Kabarett am Sonntag, 12. Januar, ab 18 Uhr, erleben: Während seine Frau dachte, er ist auf Geschäftsreise, fährt ein Mann in einem Wohnmobil durch Deutschland und überfällt Banken - auch im Kreis Miltenberg und im Kreis Main-Spessart. Das Besondere: er bedrohte die Menschen zwar, war aber dabei höflich - und wünschte am Ende sogar noch einen schönen Tag. Mehr Informationen und Tickets gibt es hier.

Um einen erschreckenden Kriminalfall, der sich am Hasenkopf-Berg in Aschaffenburg zugetragen hat, geht es in dieser Podcast-Folge. Ein Unbekannter lauert einer jungen Frau im Jahr 1988 auf, zwingt sie, mit ihrem Auto an den Hasenkopf vor den Toren Aschaffenburgs zu fahren. Dort misshandelt er sie und versucht, sie umzubringen. Erst nach 30 Jahren führt eine bislang unentdeckte Spur die Ermittler zum dem Täter. Der Mann wird wegen versuchten Mordes verurteilt. Mehr über den Fall lest ihr hier. Hier gibt es Tickets für unseren nächsten Live-Podcast "Der freundliche Bankräuber" am Sonntag, 12. Januar 2025, im Hofgarten Kabarett in Aschaffenburg. Fragen, Anregungen und Feedback: podcast@main-echo.de.

Det skulle bli den stora stöten. I grodmansdräkter och lösbröst rusade de in på banken. Men när ligans hjärna sköt sig själv i benet började allt gå fel.Det här är en repris från augusti 2017

I november 1978 blev den lilla landsortsstaden Murwillumbah i Australien skådeplatsen för ett av de mest vågade och mystiska bankrånen i historien. En grupp rånare tog sig in i Bank of New South Wales mitt i natten, stal en förmögenhet på 1,7 miljoner dollar – motsvarande 10 miljoner i dagens värde – och försvann utan ett spår. Polisen var bara 100 meter bort, men ingen hörde eller såg någonting.I detta avsnitt dyker vi ner i den osannolika historien bakom Australiens perfekta kupp. Vilka var rånarna? Hur lyckades dom utföra brottet med sådan precision?  Get bonus content on Patreon Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Der Fachkräftemangel macht auch vor Bankräubern nicht Halt - wir reden über Kölns dümmste Diebe, einen nackten Japaner, der sich für ne TV-Show einschließen und filmen ließ, Nadines Vergangenheit als Ratten-Paula, Fragen über Fragen zu Wrestling und und und. Das alles noch mehr in dieser Folge Nettgeflüster. Los gehts!

•Kinderhörspiel, ab 8 Jahren• Auf der Beerdigung von Annes Oma tauchen plötzlich zwei fiese Ganoven auf: Die Bankräuber Brat-Kurt und Auto-Meier. Das kann ja nur ein Durcheinander werden! Von Erwin Grosche WDR 2019 www.wdrmaus.de Von Erwin Grosche.

...der muss sich auch nicht wundern, wenn er geschnappt wird, oder so. Fragt mich nicht nach Redewendungen, ich hab längst nicht so viele fancy Abschlüsse wie Carl Gugasian, unser Bankräuber für diese Woche. Dafür aber ein besseres Benehmen, und das ist ja auch was wert. Viel Spaß!

Hier gibt es Tickets für den Live-Podcast "Tatort Hasenkopf" am Donnerstag, 21. November 2024, im Medienhaus Main-Echo in Aschaffenburg. Hier gibt es Tickets für den Live-Podcast "Der freundliche Bankräuber" am Sonntag, 12. Januar 2025, im Hofgarten Kabarett in Aschaffenburg. Eifernder Hexenschlächter und fanatischer Judenfeind oder heiligenähnlicher Wohltäter? Julius Echter von Mespelbrunn polarisiert bis heute. Als Fürstbischof hat er Würzburg und Unterfranken geprägt wie kaum ein anderer – und das nicht nur durch die neugegründete Universität oder das Juliusspital. Sein Name steht auch für Vertreibung und Verfolgung. Ein Blick ins Main-Echo-Archiv schärft den Blick auf den berühmtesten Spross der Adelsfamilie Echter und der Gemeinde Mespelbrunn (Kreis Aschaffenburg). Main-Echo-Redakteurin Veronika Schreck hat sich auf Julius Echters Spuren begeben und spricht im Podcast über Licht und Schatten seines Lebens. Hier geht es zu ihrem Text.

Polizei sucht in Obermenzing nach Bankräuber UND Hallenbad im Westend bleibt zu Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Deras äldste bror var sheriff och flera av de yngre bröderna försökte följa i hans fotspår. Men när de inte fick betalt bytte de sida och blev USA:s främsta bank- och tågrånare.Wikipedia säger sitt om Bröderna Dalton. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Bei "Akte Rheinland" geht es um eine spektakuläre Bankraubserie in den 1990er Jahren. Die "Kanzlerbande", das waren Klaus und Michael, genannt Mike. Innerhalb von zwölf Jahren überfielen sie mit einem ausgeklügelten System zahlreiche Banken, erbeuteten Millionen Euro und trugen dabei Masken von Gerhard Schröder, Bill Clinton oder Ronald Reagan. Erst 2002 konnten sie in Sankt Augustin bei Bonn auf dem Weg zu einem weiteren Überfall geschnappt. werden. Wir beleuchten die Hintergründe, berichten, wie die Opfer der Überfälle diese verkraftet haben, und fragen uns: Darf man eigentlich trotz des geradezu martialischen Auftretens der Bankräuber eine gewisse Faszination für sie empfinden? Was machen Klaus und Mike eigentlich heute? Und: Wo ist eigentlich das Geld geblieben? Alle Infos zum Live-Podcast gibt's hier: ga.de/live-podcast. Direkt zu den Tickets: https://www.bonnticket.de/event/live-podcast-contra-kreis-theater-19178987/ Den Geschichts-Podcast "Hinter Bonner Türen" unserer Kolleginnen Johanna Lübke und Christine Ludewig vom General-Anzeiger Bonn findet ihr hier: https://ga.de/bonn/stadt-bonn/hinter-bonner-tueren-ga-geschichtspodcast-alle-folgen_aid-99004387 - und natürlich überall, wo es Podcasts gibt. Feedback, Themenvorschläge und Fragen an podcast@ga.de oder via Instagram-DM an @akterheinland.

Eine telefonische Geldbestellung, ein ganz sicherlich bombensicherer Unsichtbarkeitstrick und drei Polizisten, die was sehr, sehr wichtiges vergessen. Das macht zusammen: Sieben Trottel, einen Weltrekord und - Gottseidank - keine Toten. Willkommen zur Trottelfolge Nummer 5!Hier kannst Du VorN unterstützen: https://steadyhq.com/Hier findest du auch alle Quellen in Infos zum FallHier geht´s zu Podcast ohne "richtigen" Namen https://podcastohnerichtigennamen.de/Quellen Trottel 1+2:Artikel CNN 2010: Bank robbery suspect calls ahead with demand for cash https://edition.cnn.com/2010/CRIME/03/24/phone.in.robbery/index.htmlArtikel FindLaw 2010: Cops Nab Criminal Suspects Accused of Calling Ahead to Rob a Bank https://archive.findlaw.com/blog/cops-nap-criminal-suspects-accused-of-calling-ahead-to-rob-a-bank/Quellen Trottel 3+4:Artikel Pittsburgh Post-Gazette 1995: https://www.newspapers.com/article/pittsburgh-post-gazette-robber-is-senten/109930926/Wikipedia: Greater Pittsburgh Bank Robberies https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1995_Greater_Pittsburgh_bank_robberiesArtikel Bankingclub 2020: Der ganz schön sichtbare unsichtbare Bankräuber https://www.bankingclub.de/news/fun-fact/der-ganz-schoen-sichtbare-unsichtbare-bankraeuber/Wikipedia: Dunning-Kruger-Effekt https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning-Kruger-EffektQuellen Trottel 5, 6 + 7:Wikipedia: Andreas M. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andreas_MihaveczGuinness Buch der Weltrekorde: Längstes Überleben ohne Essen und Wasser https://guinnessworldrecords.com/world-records/67607-longest-survival-without-food-and-waterZugang Zeitungsarchiv Vorarlberger Nachrichten https://texte.volare.vorarlberg.at/viewer/metadata/VorarlbergerNachrichten1979Q2/376/Archiv Parlament Österreich: Stenographisches Protokolle des Nationalrates, Anfrage des Abgeordneten Kabas an Bundesinnenminister Lanc 1985 https://www.parlament.gv.at/dokument/XVI/J/1203/imfname_450799.pdfDebunked: What are the Limits of Human Survival? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uT0DaoZyf3I Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Eene Meene Hexerei – die Vierte Katja Nottke zum Zweiten! In ihrer Analyse-Reihe der Ursprungsserie „Eene Meene Hexerei“ steht diesmal die vierte „Bibi Blocksberg“-Folge auf dem Programm, in der zum zweiten Mal Synchronsprecherin Katja Nottke die Rolle unserer Lieblingshexe übernimmt. Für Stefan ist „Der Bankräuber“ ein Highlight, für Antje eher weniger. Das muss dringend ausdiskutiert werden!

Am 30. September 1998 überfallen drei Bankräuber aus Italien die Hypo-Filiale am Innsbrucker Boznerplatz. Ein Täter wird gefasst, einer ist tot. Erschossen von der Polizei. Der dritte Täter ist auf der Flucht durch die Innsbrucker Sillschlucht. Die gesamte Bevölkerung im Wipptal ist zur Vorsicht aufgerufen. Der Täter ist nämlich extrem gefährlich und schwerbewaffnet. Und er ist bereit, zum Äußersten zu gehen.

Hey, hier sind wir! Ne, nicht da... Hier, hinter den Schließfächern! Haben es uns für ne kurze Sommerpause gemütlich gemacht, aber jetzt sind wir zurück - gut hydriert (mit nem ganz besonderen Getränk) und einem frischen Haarschnitt von unserem Lieblingsfriseur und Bankräuber William Smarto. Viel Spaß!

Schusswechsel im Zentrum von Innsbruck! Am 30. September 1998 überfallen drei Bankräuber aus Italien die Hypo Filiale am Innsbrucker Boznerplatz. Die Polizei ist sofort vor Ort. Es folgt ein wilder Schusswechsel. Einer der Täter nimmt eine Geisel und wirft sogar eine Handgranate. Im Podcast hören wir beteiligte Zeugen und auch einen der Polizisten, der bei diesem gefährlich Einsatz dabei gewesen ist.

This Day in Legal History: Switzerland Federal Charter SignedThis day in legal history marks the anniversary of the signing of the Federal Charter on August 1, 1291, which laid the foundation for the Swiss Confederation. This historic agreement united three Alpine cantons—Uri, Schwyz, and Unterwalden—establishing a pact for mutual defense against external threats and maintaining internal peace. The Federal Charter, known as the "Bundesbrief," is one of the earliest examples of a written constitution in Europe, symbolizing the birth of Switzerland as a confederation.The signatories pledged to support each other in disputes and conflicts, emphasizing the principles of cooperation and self-governance. This alliance was crucial in resisting the influence of the Habsburg dynasty, which sought to dominate the region. Over time, additional cantons joined the confederation, expanding and strengthening the alliance.The Federal Charter's emphasis on mutual defense and collaboration laid the groundwork for Switzerland's longstanding tradition of neutrality and federalism. It remains a significant symbol of Swiss national identity and independence. The principles enshrined in the charter continue to influence Switzerland's political structure and commitment to direct democracy. Today, August 1 is celebrated as Swiss National Day, commemorating the unity and enduring legacy of the Federal Charter.Accounting regulators and industry leaders are drafting reforms to state CPA licensing rules to expand the profession's workforce by allowing new pathways to earn the credential. These changes may include skills acquired outside the classroom. Draft changes to model legislation, serving as a template for state regulations, could be ready for public comment by September. The goal is to finalize these changes before next year's legislative sessions, according to Sue Coffey, CEO of public accounting for the Association of International Certified Professional Accountants.The reforms aim to address declining graduation rates and a workforce that has shrunk by 17% since the pandemic. Proposed pathways for earning the CPA credential may include a mix of formal education and work experience, potentially eliminating the requirement for 150 college credit hours and specific schooling.A recent report suggests offering skills-based paths without traditional education requirements, which could attract more candidates, including minority students. The report also recommends increasing starting wages, improving the profession's image, and providing more flexible schedules.The pipeline task force is collaborating with the National Association of State Boards of Accountancy to develop model language and outline essential skills for credentialed accountants. In September, a broader group of industry leaders will discuss advancing these recommendations and developing a scorecard to measure progress.States are already exploring flexible education requirements, with some proposing alternatives such as apprenticeships and different combinations of education and experience. Coffey emphasizes that any licensing reforms should maintain the rigor of the CPA license while accommodating state-specific solutions.CPAs Pitch More ‘Flexible' Licensing Rules to Expand WorkforceRudolph Giuliani has agreed to pay $100,000 in cash and use proceeds from future sales of his multimillion-dollar homes to settle administrative bankruptcy fees, concluding his Chapter 11 case. Giuliani and his largest creditors reached an agreement outlining how he will exit bankruptcy without having to testify about his finances. Despite a judge ruling that the case must be dismissed due to a lack of progress, Giuliani initially struggled to guarantee payment for an estimated $400,000 in fees. Under the proposed order, Giuliani will immediately pay $100,000 to Global Data Risk LLC, with the remaining fees to be covered by proceeds from the sale of his Manhattan penthouse or his Palm Beach condominium. GDR will have liens on both properties and may foreclose if fees are not paid within six months. Giuliani's Manhattan penthouse is listed for $5.7 million, and his Florida home is valued at approximately $3.5 million.Giuliani filed for bankruptcy in December following a $148 million defamation judgment. He has $10.6 million in assets but failed to provide full financial records during nearly seven months in Chapter 11. Additionally, he faces a defamation suit from Dominion Voting Systems, criminal cases related to the 2020 election, and a $10 million lawsuit from former employee Noelle Dunphy for sexual harassment and assault. The case is In re Rudolph W. Giuliani, Bankr. S.D.N.Y., No. 23-12055.Giuliani Reaches Bankruptcy Dismissal Deal to Pay Legal FeesCrowdStrike has been sued by shareholders, accusing the cybersecurity company of concealing inadequate software testing that led to a massive global outage on July 19, affecting over 8 million computers. The proposed class action, filed in Austin, Texas, claims that CrowdStrike misled investors about the reliability of its technology, which was proven false when a faulty software update caused significant disruptions worldwide, including to airlines, banks, hospitals, and emergency services. Following the outage, CrowdStrike's share price dropped by 32% over 12 days, erasing $25 billion in market value.Chief Executive George Kurtz is required to testify before the U.S. Congress, and Delta Air Lines has hired attorney David Boies to seek damages, reporting $500 million in losses from the incident. The lawsuit references a March 5 conference call where Kurtz described the software as "validated, tested and certified." CrowdStrike, based in Austin, denies the allegations and intends to defend itself vigorously. The lawsuit, led by the Plymouth County Retirement Association, seeks unspecified damages for holders of CrowdStrike Class A shares between November 29, 2023, and July 29, 2024.The case is named Plymouth County Retirement Association v. CrowdStrike Inc et al, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas. The aftermath of the outage and the subsequent drop in stock prices might lead to more lawsuits against CrowdStrike.CrowdStrike is sued by shareholders over huge software outage | ReutersPaul Hastings has recruited Brian Israel, the former chair of Arnold & Porter's environmental practice, to co-head its environmental litigation practice. Israel, based in Washington and Los Angeles, brings over 20 years of private practice experience and a decade of leadership in environmental law. He is known for representing major corporations such as BP in the Deepwater Horizon oil spill case, as well as companies like Chemours Co., CSX Corp., Dow Chemical, Honeywell Inc., Monsanto Co., and Motorola Solutions Inc.Israel's decision to join Paul Hastings came after collaborating with its lawyers on a significant environmental case, which convinced him of the firm's potential to become a leading force in environmental law. Paul Hastings' environmental practice is co-chaired by Navi Dhillon and has a strong presence in California. Israel sees his move as an opportunity to help build a nationally recognized environmental practice.This hiring continues Paul Hastings' trend of attracting top legal talent, including recent additions like a 12-lawyer white collar team in Paris, trial lawyer Renato Mariotti in Chicago, and cybersecurity expert Michelle Reed in Dallas. On the transactional side, the firm recently added an 11-partner private credit and restructuring team from King & Spalding.Israel noted that his area of focus is evolving due to national low-carbon initiatives and recent Supreme Court rulings, which have reshaped the environmental regulatory landscape. These changes are increasing demand for high-level expertise in environmental law, a demand that Israel is well-positioned to meet. He joined Arnold & Porter in 2000 after serving as a trial attorney in the environmental enforcement section of the US Department of Justice and has authored a leading treatise on Natural Resource Damages claims.Paul Hastings chair Frank Lopez stated that Israel's addition enhances the firm's capability to handle complex and important matters for its premier clients.Paul Hastings Lures Arnold & Porter Environmental Chair Israel This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

Finansredaksjonen har tatt ferie og kommer knallsterkt tilbake med flere spesialer fra Arendalsuken som starter 12. august. Frem til da har vi lest inn noen gode historier fra Dagens Næringsliv og D2, som dere kan lytte til i sommerukene.De to neste uke leverer vi to spesialutgaver med Finansredaksjonen og Den politiske situasjonen - hvor vår kommentatorer Anita Hoemsnes, Eva Grinde, børskommentator Thor Chr. Jensen, finansredaktør Terje Erikstad og politisk redaktør Frithjof Jacobsen ser på dagens situasjon i krysningen mellom finans og politikk.Men først - historien om: Bingoarven og den hjelpsomme bankrådgiverenDe var Drammens store bingomillionærer. Da ektemannen døde, satt Gerd Ninni Allum (86) igjen med 110 millioner kroner. Hun hadde et nært forhold til ekteparets tidligere bankrådgiver. Han kjørte henne til legen, lagde mat og de har feiret julaften sammen. Noen år senere døde hun. Da var bankkontoen nærmest tom. Hva skjedde med bingoarven? Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

This Day in Legal History: James McCord ArrestedOn June 17, 1972, James McCord, security director for President Richard Nixon's re-election committee, and four Cuban-Americans were arrested for breaking into the Democratic National Committee Headquarters at the Watergate complex in Washington, D.C. This event marked the beginning of the Watergate scandal, a major political scandal in the United States that ultimately led to President Nixon's resignation. The burglars were caught wiretapping phones and stealing documents, intending to gather information to sabotage Nixon's political opponents. As investigations unfolded, it was revealed that the break-in was part of a broader campaign of political espionage and sabotage conducted by the Nixon administration. The scandal exposed widespread abuse of power, including illegal wiretapping, break-ins, and attempts to cover up these activities. Journalists Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein of The Washington Post played a crucial role in uncovering the details of the scandal, leading to increased public scrutiny and pressure on the administration.The investigation led to the indictment of several Nixon administration officials and the creation of the Senate Watergate Committee. The most significant outcome was the discovery of the existence of secret tapes of conversations in the Oval Office, which revealed President Nixon's involvement in the cover-up. Faced with the likelihood of impeachment, Nixon became the first U.S. president to resign from office on August 8, 1974. The Watergate scandal had a lasting impact on American politics, leading to increased transparency and reforms aimed at preventing such abuses of power in the future.The rare disease community is advocating for changes to the Inflation Reduction Act's drug price-setting scheme, which is causing drugmakers and investors to reconsider developing drugs for small patient populations. Companies like Pfizer, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Eli Lilly, and Protagonist Therapeutics are altering their research strategies due to concerns over recouping costs under the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program. This program exempts orphan drugs with a single FDA-approved indication from price negotiations, but those with multiple indications might not qualify for the exclusion, even if they are not yet approved for additional conditions.Opponents are seeking legislative and judicial changes to amend the Inflation Reduction Act, as companies and investors shift their focus away from rare disease and small-molecule drugs. Jamie Sullivan of the EveryLife Foundation for Rare Diseases emphasized the importance of achieving technical fixes to support innovation. Recent legislative efforts aim to protect the development of these drugs, and companies like AstraZeneca are challenging the provisions in court. The Inflation Reduction Act has made the capital environment more challenging for rare disease drugs, according to John Stanford of the Incubate Coalition.Patient groups and some manufacturers argue that the exemption reduces incentives provided by the Orphan Drug Act, which has historically promoted the research and development of rare disease medicines. These drugs often launch with a single indication but can later be approved for additional uses. Concerns are rising that the current policies may hinder further research into rare diseases. Despite industry concerns, some groups argue that drug companies still have substantial resources for robust R&D and can profit from expanding indications for orphan drugs. A CMS spokesperson stated that the negotiation program aligns with the law and won't harm long-term innovation.US Drug Negotiations Plan Shifts Focus for Rare Disease ProgramsAlex Jones' personal bankruptcy has been converted to a Chapter 7 liquidation, meaning a trustee will now manage how he pays the $1.5 billion in defamation judgments against him. Jones was unable to reach an agreement with the families of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting victims, whom he defamed by claiming the 2012 massacre was a hoax. US Bankruptcy Judge Christopher Lopez ruled that Jones' case does not qualify for exceptions to prevent its conversion to Chapter 7, despite Jones' objections.During the same hearing, Judge Lopez dismissed the bankruptcy case of Infowars' parent company, Free Speech Systems LLC, allowing the Sandy Hook families to pursue their claims in state court. The judge clarified that there was never a request to shut down Infowars itself. Lopez expressed the difficulty of the case, acknowledging its connection to the tragic 2012 shooting.Jones' defamation debts were deemed non-dischargeable in bankruptcy due to the intentional and malicious nature of his actions. Following state court verdicts, Free Speech Systems filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in July 2022, and Jones filed for personal bankruptcy in December 2022. Efforts to reach a consensual bankruptcy plan failed, prompting the recent conversion to Chapter 7.Jones and the Sandy Hook families had recently agreed on the need to convert his case to Chapter 7, but the Free Speech Systems case remained contentious. Ultimately, the court decided that dismissing the Free Speech case was in the best interest of creditors. Despite potential liquidation, Jones may start a new broadcast, according to attorneys for the Sandy Hook families. This case is being managed under Alexander E. Jones, Bankr. S.D. Tex., No. 22-33553, as of June 14, 2024.Alex Jones Loses Financial Control as Trustee Takes Over (4)Alex Jones' assets to be liquidated as his company exits bankruptcy | ReutersAt a star-studded fundraiser in Los Angeles on June 15, President Joe Biden criticized the U.S. Supreme Court as being "out of kilter," emphasizing that it has never been as out of step as it is today. The event, which featured former President Barack Obama and Hollywood celebrities like George Clooney and Julia Roberts, raised over $30 million for Biden's campaign. Biden highlighted the court's conservative leanings, particularly criticizing Justice Clarence Thomas's remarks on reconsidering issues like in vitro fertilization and contraception. He also warned that if Donald Trump wins the 2024 election, he could appoint two more justices, which Biden described as alarming.The fundraiser was framed by a video montage contrasting Biden's record with that of Trump, drawing cheers from the audience. Biden noted that the Supreme Court, now dominated by conservatives appointed by Trump, has made decisions restricting affirmative action, gay rights, gun control, and environmental regulations. Obama reiterated the importance of elections in determining the court's power, linking the current situation to Trump's 2016 victory.The event marked the largest Democratic fundraiser in history, surpassing a previous record set in New York City. Other celebrities present included Jack Black, Jason Bateman, and Kathryn Hahn. Despite Biden's low approval ratings and concerns about his age, the fundraiser aimed to showcase the campaign's strength and momentum. Biden and Trump are currently tied in national polls, with Trump leading in battleground states. Both candidates have raised significant funds in California, demonstrating the state's financial influence on their campaigns.Biden slams Supreme Court at $30 million fundraiser with Obama, Clooney, Julia Roberts | Reuters This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

Er war ein talentierter Fussballer und wurde fast zum Profi bei den Young Boys in Bern. Doch Marco Müller entschied sich für einen anderen Weg – und wurde Bankräuber. Er überfiel eine Bank nach der anderen und erhielt von den Schweizer Medien den Übernamen «Gangster jurassien».Mehrere Millionen Franken erbeutet er, wurde erwischt und brach danach aus verschiedenen Gefängnissen aus. Das letzte Mal hörte man von Müller Ende der Achzigerjahre. Dann tauchte er ab – über 36 Jahre lang. Kein Lebenszeichen, kein Foto, nichts.Bis zum Montag, 26. Februar 2024: beim Dorfeingang des jurassischen Dorfes Bassecourt kollidiert ein Zug mit einer Person. Drei Wochen später ist klar: Bei diesem Mann handelt es sich um Marco Müller.Quentin Schlapbach, Redaktor der Berner Zeitung, hat das abenteuerliche Leben von Marco Müller nachgezeichnet und erzählt davon in einer neuen Folge des täglichen Podcasts «Apropos».Host: Philipp LoserProduktion: Sara SpreiterMehr zum Thema:Marco Müllers Leben wäre Stoff für eine Netflix-SerieBankräuber und Ex-YB-Spieler Marco Müller tödlich verunfallt Als Podcast-Hörer:in den Tagi 3 Monate zum Preis von einem Monat lesen und hören: tagiabo.chHabt ihr Feedback, Ideen oder Kritik zu «Apropos»? Schreibt uns an podcasts@tamedia.ch

Wir machen weiter im Themenmonat „Selbstüberschätzung“ und wir nähern uns dem Thema von psychologischer und soziologischer Seite. Beispielsweise könnt Ihr gespannt sein auf die Geschichte eines Bankräubers, der felsenfest davon überzeugt war, es könne ihn keiner erwischen, da er unsichtbar sei. Wie das wohl kommen konnte und was eine Zitrone damit zu tun hat, das können wir Euch erzählen. Natürlich geht es aber auch um aktuelles politisches Zeitgeschehen – von Wermelskirchen bis Washington. Wir amüsieren uns über so manchen Selbstüberschätzer und fangen an, uns zu fragen, ob und inwiefern eine gesunde Portion Größenwahn nicht auch hin und wieder sehr hilfreich sein kann. Macht das Fenster im Kopf auf und lüftet einmal kräftig durch – heute heißt es wieder KSS – die Kirmes im Kopf. 

Der humorvolle Bankräuberfilm beginnt mit einem ungewöhnlichen Raub: Morán erleichtert die Bank um 600.000 Dollar, bei der er selbst leitender Angestellter ist. Er weiß, dass er gefasst wird, findet aber die kalkulierten dreieinhalb Jahre Gefängnis angenehmer als 25 Jahre langweiligen 9-to-5-Job in der Sparkasse . „Die Missetäter“ („Los delincuentes“) von Rodrigo Morenos war argentinischer Oscar-Kandidat 2024.

Der Fall der deutschen Bankräuber Kurt Sandweg und Waldemar Velte zeigt exemplarisch, wie schwierig die Lage für junge Menschen nach dem Ersten Weltkrieg war. Am 5. Januar 1934 – also vor 90 Jahren – betreten zwei Unbekannte die Wever-Bank in Basel mit Pistolen. Und sie schiessen, bevor sie sich in der Kasse bedienen. Zwei Bankangestellte werden so schwer verletzt, sterben noch am gleichen Tag im Spital. Der Banküberfall dauert nur wenige Minuten, die Täter fliehen in einem blauen Ford mit schwarzem Verdeck. In der «Zeitblende» wird die Geschichte der beiden deutschen Bankräuber Kurt Sandweg und Waldemar Velte erzählt. Die beiden hielten die Region Basel tagelang in Atem, erschossen auf der Flucht drei Polizisten und nahmen sich am Schluss das Leben. Im Margarethenpark in Basel, umstellt von der Polizei, sahen die Bankräuber keinen anderen Ausweg mehr. Dank Original-Polizeiakten und Zeugenaussagen aus dem Staatsarchiv Basel-Stadt, ist die Geschichte des schwersten Verbrechens in Basel im 20. Jahrhundert bestens dokumentiert. Zu den wichtigsten Zeugenaussagen gehört jene von Victoria «Dorly» Schupp. Die Schallplattenverkäuferin aus dem Basler Warenhaus Globus hat die beiden Deutschen im Dezember 1933 kennengelernt und viel Zeit mit ihnen verbracht, ohne ihre wahre Geschichte zu kennen. Als das Ganze auffliegt, verrät Dorly Schupp die Beiden an die Polizei. «Man muss die Geschichte auch in der Zeit sehen: Das sind 15 Jahre nach dem ersten Weltkrieg, als ein einzelnes Menschenleben nach diesem mechanisierten Töten, millionenfach, nicht mehr gar so kostbar war», sagt der Schweizer Schriftsteller Alex Capus, der mit dem Roman «Fast ein bisschen Frühling» die Geschichte von Sandweg und Velte erzählt. Die beiden Männer, 23 Jahre alt, arbeitslos, wollen weg aus Nazi-Deutschland. Ihr grosses Ziel: Indien. Aber im Europa der 30-er Jahre ist es alles andere als einfach für junge Menschen ihre Träume zu leben. Nach dem 1. Weltkrieg werden die Grenzen streng kontrolliert, es braucht Stempel, Formulare - und es braucht Geld. Was wiederum einer der Auslöser für den Banküberfall am 5. Januar 1934 in Basel war.  Quellen/Literatur: - Capus, Alex (2002): Fast ein bisschen Fühling: Carl Hanser Verlag, Staatsarchiv des Kantons Basel-Stadt, Museum Laufental

Mit „Testo“ zeigt Kida Ramadan in der ARD-Mediathek eine knallharte Bankräuber-Serie. In „Dear Elizabeth“ wird auf Prime Video ein Mann unfreiwillig zum Promi-Stalker und auf WOW versucht ein Ehepaar sich in „The Trip“ gegenseitig umzubringen. Hier entlang geht's zu den Links unserer Werbepartner: https://detektor.fm/werbepartner/was-laeuft-heute >> Artikel zum Nachlesen: https://detektor.fm/kultur/was-laeuft-heute-dear-elizabeth-testo-the-trip

Mit „Testo“ zeigt Kida Ramadan in der ARD-Mediathek eine knallharte Bankräuber-Serie. In „Dear Elizabeth“ wird auf Prime Video ein Mann unfreiwillig zum Promi-Stalker und auf WOW versucht ein Ehepaar sich in „The Trip“ gegenseitig umzubringen. Hier entlang geht's zu den Links unserer Werbepartner: https://detektor.fm/werbepartner/was-laeuft-heute >> Artikel zum Nachlesen: https://detektor.fm/kultur/was-laeuft-heute-dear-elizabeth-testo-the-trip

Das 21. Türchen unseres "Verbrechen"-Adventskalenders. Dahinter verbirgt sich ein Bankräuber, der 3,2 Millionen Mark erbeutet, aber mit dem Reichtum nicht warm wird.

Freundlich, stumm, gelassen und leise rein in die Bank. Mit dem Geld freundlich, stumm, gelassen und leise raus aus der Bank. Rein in den 75er Chevrolet. Gemütlich wegfahren. So arbeitet Cowboy Bob, der schlanke Mann mit Bart, Brille, Handschuhen und klassischem Stetson-Hut im Texas der frühen 90er Jahre – seriellkriminell sensationell erfolgreich. Das FBI steht auf dem Schlauch und befürchtet, es mit einem Mastermind zu tun zu haben. Warum bekommen die Ermittler Cowboy Bob eineinhalb Jahre lang nicht zu fassen? Du möchtest mehr über unsere Werbepartner erfahren? Hier findest du alle Infos & Rabatte: https://linktr.ee/verbrechenohnerichtigennamen

Sie agieren hochprofessionell, flüchten meist mit PS-starken Autos. Dabei gehen diese Täter ein hohes Risiko ein: Sie jagen Geldautomaten mit Sprengstoff in die Luft. Im Harz nahmen Kriminelle sogar eine Geisel.

Die Verwandlung eines High-Society-Girls zur Bankräuberin und wieder zurück: Die 19-jährige Millionenerbin Patty Hearst wird von der Guerillagruppe SLA entführt. Sie schließt sich ihnen an, raubt Banken aus und wird im Vietnamkriegs-Amerika zur revolutionären Ikone. Nach ihrer Verhaftung sie, einer Gehirnwäsche unterzogen worden zu sein. // Mit Françoise Cactus, Brezel Göring, u.a. / Komposition und Realisation: Françoise Cactus/Brezel Göring / BR 2007

Der klassische Bankräuber stirbt aus, ein weiteres uraltes Handwerk...

Im Interview: Christiana Bukalo ist die Gründerin der Nonprofit-Organisation “Statefree”. Chelsea Spieker spricht mit ihr im Interview über Staatenlosigkeit und welche Probleme damit im Alltag einhergehen. Der israelische Historiker Moshe Zimmermann zur Rolle des Irans im aktuellen Nahost-Konflikt. Börsenreporterin Anne Schwedt berichtet über die Quartalszahlen von Tesla und Netflix. Intelligente Mülleimer in Berlin funken SOS an die BSR, wenn sie geleert werden müssen. Bankräuber braucht kriminelle Nachhilfe: Nach einem missglückten Überfall wird auch die Flucht zur Lachnummer.

Er det fredag? Så kan du godt låse pengekassen. Der er nemlig en overhængende risiko for, at The Friday Night Robber kigger forbi din lokale bank. Paul Gugasian frygtede, at han havde ødelagt hele sin fremtid, da han som 16 årig røvede en slikbutik. Og da hans inkompetente studievejleder fortalte ham, at pletten på hans straffeattest ikke kunne vaskes væk, så kunne han lige så godt kaste sig over et liv som vanekriminel. Det gjorde han så til gengæld også med manér! --------------------- REKLAME: Dagens afsnit er sponsoreret af og indeholder reklame for HelloFresh og Zetland! Brug koden VANVITTIGVH når du skriver dig op til måltidskasser hos HelloFresh og få op til 1.195 kr rabat på de fem første måltidskasser - og gratis fragt på den første. De næste tre uger er vi også ambassadører for netavisen Zetland! Derfor kan du få 30 dages zetland for helt ned til 1 krone. Oveni hatten får du samtidig adgang til et spritnyt og unikt afsnit af VVH. Alt, du skal gøre er at skrive dig op på: zetland.dk/VV. For hver der skriver sig op giver Zetland os 200 kr at lave podcast for! Tak til begge for at bidrage til at holde podcasten gratis! --------------------- Dagens Øl: Odintrunk, Schlossbrauerei Fürstlich Drehna (5,4 %) SKIP TIL 09:00 FOR HISTORIEN. Find billetter til live-shows på: vanvittigverdenshistorie.dk/live-shows Se Vanvidsbarometeret på: barometerbjarke.dk

Alexander Stevens gehört zu Deutschlands bekanntesten Strafverteidigern. Seit mehr als zwölf Jahren vertritt er Mörder, Vergewaltiger, Bankräuber und sorgt mit seinen spektakulären Prozessen immer wieder für bundesweites Aufsehen. In seinem neuen Buch beschäftigt er sich intensiv mit Geschichten, die alle eines gemeinsam haben: Jemand wird für eine Tat verdächtigt – und Stevens kommt nach gründlichem Studium der Akten zum Urteil: falsch verdächtigt! Im Gespräch mit Giuseppe Di Grazia erzählt Alexander Stevens von Mandanten und Mandantinnen, bei denen eine voreilige und fahrlässige Verdachtsschöpfung stattgefunden hat. Und: Er äußert sich auch zum Fall des Comedian Luke Mockridge.+++ Unsere allgemeinen Datenschutzrichtlinien finden Sie unter https://datenschutz.ad-alliance.de/podcast.html+++ Weitere Infos zu unseren Werbepartnern finden Sie hier: https://linktr.ee/spurensuche +++Unsere allgemeinen Datenschutzrichtlinien finden Sie unter https://art19.com/privacy. Die Datenschutzrichtlinien für Kalifornien sind unter https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info abrufbar.

Willkommen zum XY Special Teil 3! Heute gehr es um einen mysteriösen Vermisetenfall, einen unschuldigen Bankräuber? und um einen wirklich krassen Mord an einem Familienvater nach dem Strickmuster des KGBs. Triggerwarnung: Generell haben unsere Folgen immer etwas von Gewalt im Detail. Jeder kann sich von der erzählten Abfolge getriggert fühlen. HörerInnen die bereits Gewalt am eigenen Körper erfahren haben, raten wir vom hören unserer Folgen ab!

Letzte Woche ging's wild zu bei Brainpain, und heute wird's nicht besser: Flo fragt sich, ob eine Diät aus Ohren- und Nasenerzeugnissen wirklich gesund sein kann, Timon deckt die wilden Verschwörungen eines geheimen Pärchens auf und Schiller und Goethe versuchen sich an nem Drive-by. Außerdem: Die Rückkehr des jüngsten Bankräubers, ein wütender Waldpapa und Sex mit Herrn Duden!

Heute ist Brainpain wahrlich Programm: Eine Stunde absoluter Nonsens, Lachanfälle und Hirnsturm de luxe! Timon wird zum potentiellen Pflanzenmörder, Flo will eine Baumstadt errichten und ein sehr kleiner Kerl begeht eine sehr schwere Straftat (nein, nicht Flo!!). Außerdem mit dabei: Sex am Bahnhof, das absolut perfekte Verbrechen und sehr, sehr viel Wald! Schnallt euch an, es wird dumm!

Fast täglich werden in Deutschland Geldautomaten gesprengt, die Schäden sind enorm und die Täter nehmen dabei sogar ihren eigenen Tod in Kauf. Trotz schwieriger Ermittlungen konnte die Polizei einige Täter festnehmen.

•Krimi• Winter 1933/34, eine wahre Geschichte: Waldemar Velte und Kurt Sandweg aus Wuppertal wollen weg. Weg aus Nazi-Deutschland. In Indien wollen sie ein neues Leben beginnen. Doch dafür brauchen sie Geld. // Von Alex Capus / Regie: Annette Kurth / WDR 2003 // www.wdr.de/k/hoerspiel-newsletter Von Alex Capus.

Hans påkörd i city, tonårsdrama hos socialen, fusk, fisk och Jonas der Geländewagen. Mejla in dina frågor till: inaktuellt@podplay.se Lyssna på Inaktuellt Live VARJE torsdag från kl 09:30 på Podplay.se eller i Podplay-appen för att lyssna och ställa frågor direkt till Hans, Jonas och producenten Dawwa.