Podcasts about Nominal

Sunday March 23, 2025 at the Hub City Church Simon the Magician | Acts 8:9-25 The Birth of the Church | a teaching series through Acts Sermon by Tadd Anderson | Lead Teaching Pastor Sermon Notes: In the gospels, JESUS consistently WARNS that there is a kind of ‘NOMINAL' BELIEF that is NOT the same as GENUINE NEW BIRTH. Matthew 7:21-23 // John 2:23-25 // Matthew 13:3,5-6, 20-21 // Matthew 13:24-30 // John 6:60-70 “We know, from Jesus Himself, that there are people who can be in the church but not of the church. We know there are unsaved “Christians.” And we know that Jesus will not be fooled, even if the rest of us pretend to be.” — Dean Inserra Simon Magus: Portrait of an ‘Unsaved Christian': 1) DESIROUS of the PRAISE of MAN 2) More interested in the BENEFITS of the CHURCH than of CHRIST 3) SKEWED UNDERSTANDING of the GOSPEL 4) Deficient REPENTANCE The Hub City Church is a local expression of the church in Crestview, Florida, making disciples Who Believe the Gospel, Abide in Christ and Obey the Word to the glory of God. Join us next Sunday at 10am. 837 W James Lee Blvd, Crestview, FL 32536.

5FF 14 March 2025 - https://linktr.ee/movinghomewithcharlieFCA announces easing of mortgage restrictions https://www.fca.org.uk/news/press-releases/fca-sets-out-steps-support-home-ownershipRICS survey shows gloomy 2025https://www.rics.org/content/dam/ricsglobal/documents/market-surveys/uk-residential-market-survey/2_WEB_February_2025_RICS_UK_Residential_Market_Survey_tp.pdfGDP contracted in Januaryhttps://www.ons.gov.uk/economy/grossdomesticproductgdp/bulletins/gdpmonthlyestimateuk/january20259,500 jobs to go in NHS Englandhttps://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/starmer-abolish-nhs-england-spending-cuts-b1216459.htmlLondon to suffer worst of coming house price fallshttps://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-03-13/london-to-suffer-uk-s-worst-drop-in-house-prices-rics-saysThe first borough to see 35% nominal house price falls revealedhttps://x.com/moving_charlie/status/1900136502056702176https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1660274/house-price-crash-mapped-UK-forecast-map-recession-prediction-areas-LondonWatch the video here: https://youtube.com/live/4ElGXWZkElMSupport the showFollow me on X for daily updates: https://x.com/moving_charlie Talk to my hand picked conveyancing partners here: https://mhwc.co.uk/conveyancingCheck out our national property listings on bestagent.co.uk if you're looking for a new home or need an agent to sell or let your existing home. If you need a mortgage, talk to my hand picked, trusted mortgage team here: https://mhwc.co.uk/mortgageAll my other links: https://linktr.ee/movinghomewithcharlieFor my estate agency podcasts, visit https://linktr.ee/bestagentIf you're an estate agent, make sure you're getting your free telephone leads as well as viewing and vendor leads by joining https://bestagent.co.uk/agents

In this episode of No Compromise Radio, host Mike Abendroth flips the script as Pastor Steve Cooley takes the lead, interviewing Mike about his own journey to faith. Mike shares his background growing up in a nominally Lutheran home, his years of spiritual indifference, and the turning points that led him to truly embrace Christ. From searching for meaning after his father's passing to discovering biblical teaching through Christian radio, Mike recounts how God used various circumstances—both joyful and painful—to draw him to salvation. The conversation is filled with humor, personal anecdotes, and reflections on the power of God’s Word. Whether you’re curious about Mike’s testimony or looking for encouragement in your own faith journey, this episode is a must-listen.     Video Episode 5: “From Nominal to New” Hosts: Pastor Mike Abendroth (Pastor & Author) Special Guest: Steve Cooley (Pastor) Produced/Edited By: Marrio Escobar (Owner of D2L Productions)  Watch on YouTube: https://youtu.be/ZaJ-PgC9PWk

Swearing eases pain… Eat Nutri / Rat?... Kris Cruz tells Capybaras death story… Invasive species you can eat… PA Plane crash from Jan. flight data… Space X Crash… Intuitive Machines crash lands again… Email: ChewingTheFat@theblaze.com Stephan A Smith signs new deal… Dynamic Pricing… Who Died Today: Roy Ayers 82 / Pamela Bach 62… 988 Lifeline if needed?... Arrest in deaths of Missouri men… Barack shows up alone… Pope update… Game Show: What's The Lie? Contestant: Matthew Johnson… Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Gm! This week we're joined by Carlos Gonzalez Campo to discuss the current state of the Solana network. We deep dive into SIMD 96 & 228, why Pump.fun is launching its own AMM, REV declines in February, stablecoin growth & more. Enjoy! -- Follow Carlos: https://x.com/0xcarlosg Follow Jack: https://x.com/whosknave Follow Lightspeed: https://twitter.com/Lightspeedpodhq Subscribe to the Lightspeed Newsletter: https://blockworks.co/newsletter/lightspeed Join the Lightspeed Manlets Collective Telegram: https://t.me/+QUl_ZOj2nMJlZTEx -- Use Code LIGHTSPEED10 for 10% off tickets to Digital Asset Summit 2025: https://blockworks.co/event/digital-asset-summit-2025-new-york -- Ledger, the global leader in digital asset security, proudly sponsors the Lightspeed podcast. As Ledger celebrates 10 years of securing 20% of global crypto, it remains the top choice for securing your Solana assets. Buy a LEDGER™ device now and build confidently, knowing your SOL are safe. Buy now on https://shop.ledger.com/?r=1da180a5de00. -- Get top market insights and the latest in crypto news. Subscribe to Blockworks Daily Newsletter: https://blockworks.co/newsletter/ -- (00:00) Introduction (01:23) Takeaway's From SIMD 96 (06:47) Staking On Solana (10:04) Solana Data Deep Dive (13:05) Ledger Ad (13:55) REV On Solana (16:56) Why Pump.fun Is Launching An AMM (21:13) Solana's DEX War (26:23) REV Declines Post LIBRA (30:11) Ledger Ad (30:59) Stablecoin Growth On Solana (36:40) SIMD 228 (42:06) Nominal vs Real Yields -- Disclaimers: Lightspeed was kickstarted by a grant from the Solana Foundation. Nothing said on Lightspeed is a recommendation to buy or sell securities or tokens. This podcast is for informational purposes only, and any views expressed by anyone on the show are solely our opinions, not financial advice. Mert, Jack, and our guests may hold positions in the companies, funds, or projects discussed.

In our twenty-seventh deployment of BungleTech my spheroid co-host Michael and I dodge our standard format as we officially launch the Global Campaign Initiative. We take a few moments to walk you through the details of how to get involved as we discuss our fresh off the presses release of the Operations Manual.Our Honourable Patreon SupportersBondspersons: Eric Dacus, G, Gus, Hilux, Rob PrescottTechnicians: Blunderdome, Chris Cannon, DarkTremere, Dire Situation, Klint, Matthew Hopper, Michael Lynch, Michael Shelley, Ryan Fletcher, Sandman, Seth WhiteFoxMechWarriors: Ed Magilton, Fiddler, HeyZeus, Lorian Sunrider, Malathis, MetalEd, Phil Raider RobyLoremasters: RetroLazerSegment Start TimesPodcast Primary Intro - 4:07Local Business Practices - 7:05Podcast Primary Continue - 14:15Stories of the Inner Sphere - 41:45BungleTech LinksBungleTech PatreonBungleTech Twitter -> BungleTechTweetBungleTech Email -> BungleTech@outlook.comBungleTech Discord Homebase -> Under BungleTechBattleTech Podcast Game Mode CollectionBattleTech Global Campaign Initiative - Operations Manual & SUPERMECH SUNDAY SUPER SIGN-UP SUPER FORM

With the decline of Nominal Christians what do we make of this new navy seal-esque season of church? Do we only have spiritual juggernauts?!

Evan Koenig is a former senior aide to the president of the Dallas Fed. Evan returns to the show to discuss, the ins and outs of nominal GDP targeting, the practical applications of NGDP targeting, the reasons the Fed should consider it for the framework review, and much more. Check out the transcript for this week's episode, now with links. Recorded on October 29th, 2024 Follow David Beckworth on X: @DavidBeckworth Follow the show on X: @Macro_Musings Check out our new AI chatbot: the Macro Musebot! Join the new Macro Musings Discord server! Join the Macro Musings mailing list! Check out our Macro Musings merch! Subscribe to David's new BTS YouTube Channel  Timestamps: (00:00:00) – Intro (00:01:06) – Evan Koenig at the Fed (00:02:04) – Nominal GDP Targeting (00:06:22) – Why the Fed Didn't Consider Nominal GDP Targeting (00:17:25) – How to Explain Nominal GDP Targeting to the Public (00:23:10) – Main Arguments for Nominal GDP Targeting (00:33:52) – Practical Applications of Nominal GDP (00:47:19) – Nominal GDP Targeting and the Fed's Upcoming Framework Review (00:50:57) – Outro

Derek Moore revisits the 1994-95 interest rate and market environment against the current backdrop regarding treasury yields and future S&P 500 Index returns. Plus, going through the case for higher for longer, whether that is good or bad for markets, and the adjustment the market would need to go through. Later, quantifying how sensitive the S&P 500 Index is to change in the forward PE ratio by putting into actual numbers and levels. Also, looking at Arista Networks and Alibaba before earnings and what the options market is saying their expected one standard deviation moves might be up or down. Finally, most people look at Real Inflation adjusted GDP, but Nominal GDP growth may be correlated to the 10-year yield and what that means if we go back to pre-GFC nominal growth rates. All this and more.    What is Nominal GDP Growth Rate? What is Real GDP growth? The US Dollar index and whether we are out of the zone of significance yet? Inflation in services remains sticky Why interest rates staying higher isn't necessarily a problem for the stock market Quantifying sensitivity of the S&P 500 Index to small changes in the forward PE multiple 1994-95 vs 2024-25 update around treasury yields, S&P 500 returns Alibaba and Arista earnings this week and their option implied moves  How to calculate expected move around earnings based on implied volatility levels     Mentioned in this Episode     Derek Moore's book Broken Pie Chart https://amzn.to/3S8ADNT   Jay Pestrichelli's book Buy and Hedge https://amzn.to/3jQYgMt   Derek's book on public speaking Effortless Public Speaking https://amzn.to/3hL1Mag   Contact Derek derek.moore@zegainvestments.com       

Singapore shares started trading in positive territory today. In early trade, the Straits Times Index (STI) was up 0.2 per cent at 3,829.69 points after 24.9 million securities changed hands in the broader market. In terms of counters to watch, we have Keppel, after the firm recorded a profit of S$528 million from its continuing operations for the second half ended Dec 31. Elsewhere, from the US Postal Service suspending inbound parcels from China and Hong Kong, to disappointing reports from Google parent Alphabet and Advanced Micro Devices, more international and corporate headlines remain in focus. On Market View, Money Matters’ finance presenter Chua Tian Tian unpacked the developments with Eddy Loh, Chief Investment Officer, Maybank Group Wealth Management.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Welcome to the first episode of TGP NOMINAL Podcast for 2025. So, what happened to January? Well, with over three hours of content, spread over three episodes of the Christmas Crossover we thought you might have become fed up with us waffling on. But, Mark Taylor & John Berger are back with a spacey episode. Join the guys for their usual Trans-Atlantic banter, as they talk about everything from green dairy products to what Astronauts are called around the world. So "Buckle Up & Let's Launch This Episode Into The Podisphere” Visit: https://tgpnominal.weebly.com/tgp-nominal-116.html to explore this episode.

In this episode, I discuss the paper Nominal Techniques in Isabelle/HOL, by Christian Urban.  This paper shows how to reason with terms modulo alpha-equivalence, using ideas from nominal logic.  The basic idea is that instead of renamings, one works with permutations of names. 

Arnaud et Emmanuel discutent des versions Java, font un résumé de l'ecosystème WebAssembly, discutent du nouveau Model Context Protocol, parlent d'observabilité avec notamment les Wide Events et de pleins d'autres choses encore. Enregistré le 17 janvier 2025 Téléchargement de l'épisode LesCastCodeurs-Episode–321.mp3 ou en vidéo sur YouTube. News Langages java trend par InfoQ https://www.infoq.com/articles/java-trends-report–2024/ Java 17 finalement depasse 11 et 8 ~30/33% Java 21 est à 1.4% commonhaus apparait GraalVM en early majority Spring AI et langchain4j en innovateurs SB 3 voit son adoption augmenter Un bon résumé sur WebAssembly, les différentes specs comme WASM GC, WASI, WIT, etc https://2ality.com/2025/01/webassembly-language-ecosystem.html WebAssembly (Wasm) est un format d'instructions binaires pour une machine virtuelle basée sur une pile, permettant la portabilité et l'efficacité du code. Wasm a évolué à partir d'asm.js, un sous-ensemble de JavaScript qui pouvait fonctionner à des vitesses proches de celles natives. WASI (WebAssembly System Interface) permet à Wasm de fonctionner en dehors des navigateurs Web, fournissant des API pour le système de fichiers, CLI, HTTP, etc. Le modèle de composant WebAssembly permet l'interopérabilité entre les langages Wasm à l'aide de WIT (Wasm Interface Type) et d'ABI canonique. Les composants Wasm se composent d'un module central et d'interfaces WIT pour les importations/exportations, facilitant l'interaction indépendante du langage. Les interfaces WIT décrivent les types et les fonctions, tandis que les mondes WIT définissent les capacités et les besoins d'un composant (importations/exportations). La gestion des packages Wasm est assurée par Warg, un protocole pour les registres de packages Wasm. Une enquête a montré que Rust est le langage Wasm le plus utilisé, suivi de Kotlin et de C++; de nombreux autres langages sont également en train d'émerger. Un algorithme de comptage a taille limitée ne mémoire a été inventé https://www.quantamagazine.org/computer-scientists-invent-an-efficient-new-way-to-count–20240516/ élimine un mot de manière aléatoire mais avec une probabilité connue quand il y a besoin de récupérer de l'espace cela se fait par round et on augmente la probabilité de suppression à chaque round donc au final, ne nombre de mots / la probabilité d'avoir été éliminé donne une mesure approximative mais plutot précise Librairies Les contributions Spring passent du CLA au DCO https://spring.io/blog/2025/01/06/hello-dco-goodbye-cla-simplifying-contributions-to-spring d'abord manuel amis meme automatisé le CLA est une document legal complexe qui peut limiter les contribuitions le DCO vient le Linux je crois et est super simple accord que la licence de la conmtrib est celle du projet accord que le code est public et distribué en perpetuité s'appuie sur les -s de git pour le sign off Ecrire un serveur MCP en Quarkus https://quarkus.io/blog/mcp-server/ MCP est un protocol proposé paor Antropic pour integrer des outils orchestrables par les LLMs MCP est frais et va plus loin que les outils offre la notion de resource (file), de functions (tools), et de proimpts pre-built pour appeler l'outil de la meilleure façon On en reparlera a pres avec les agent dans un article suivant il y a une extension Quarkus pour simplifier le codage un article plus detaillé sur l'integration Quarkus https://quarkus.io/blog/quarkus-langchain4j-mcp/ GreenMail un mini mail server en java https://greenmail-mail-test.github.io/greenmail/#features-api Utile pour les tests d'integration Supporte SMTP, POP3 et IMAP avec TLS/SSL Propose des integrations JUnit, Spring Une mini UI et des APIs REST permettent d'interagir avec le serveur si par exemple vous le partagé dans un container (il n'y a pas d'integration TestContainer existante mais elle n'est pas compliquée à écrire) Infrastructure Docker Bake in a visual way https://dev.to/aurelievache/understanding-docker-part–47-docker-bake–4p05 docker back propose d'utiliser des fichiers de configuration (format HCL) pour lancer ses builds d'images et docker compose en gros voyez ce DSL comme un Makefile très simplifié pour les commandes docker qui souvent peuvent avoir un peu trop de paramètres Datadog continue de s'etendre avec l'acquisition de Quickwit https://www.datadoghq.com/blog/datadog-acquires-quickwit/ Solution open-source de recherche des logs qui peut être déployée on-premise et dans le cloud https://quickwit.io/ Les logs ne quittent plus votre environment ce qui permet de répondre à des besoins de sécurité, privacy et réglementaire Web 33 concepts en javascript https://github.com/leonardomso/33-js-concepts Call Stack, Primitive Types, Value Types and Reference Types, Implicit, Explicit, Nominal, Structuring and Duck Typing, == vs === vs typeof, Function Scope, Block Scope and Lexical Scope, Expression vs Statement, IIFE, Modules and Namespaces, Message Queue and Event Loop, setTimeout, setInterval and requestAnimationFrame, JavaScript Engines, Bitwise Operators, Type Arrays and Array Buffers, DOM and Layout Trees, Factories and Classes, this, call, apply and bind, new, Constructor, instanceof and Instances, Prototype Inheritance and Prototype Chain, Object.create and Object.assign, map, reduce, filter, Pure Functions, Side Effects, State Mutation and Event Propagation, Closures, High Order Functions, Recursion, Collections and Generators, Promises, async/await, Data Structures, Expensive Operation and Big O Notation, Algorithms, Inheritance, Polymorphism and Code Reuse, Design Patterns, Partial Applications, Currying, Compose and Pipe, Clean Code Data et Intelligence Artificielle Phi 4 et les small language models https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/blog/aiplatformblog/introducing-phi–4-microsoft%e2%80%99s-newest-small-language-model-specializing-in-comple/4357090 Phi 4 un SML pour les usages locaux notamment 14B de parametres belle progression de ~20 points sur un score aggregé et qui le rapproche de Llama 3.3 et ses 70B de parametres bon en math (data set synthétique) Comment utiliser Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking (le modèle de Google qui fait du raisonnement à la sauce chain of thought) en Java avec LangChain4j https://glaforge.dev/posts/2024/12/20/lets-think-with-gemini–2-thinking-mode-and-langchain4j/ Google a sorti Gemini 2.0 Flash, un petit modèle de la famille Gemini the “thinking mode” simule les cheminements de pensée (Chain of thoughts etc) décompose beaucoup plus les taches coplexes en plusiewurs taches un exemple est montré sur le modele se battant avec le probleme Les recommendations d'Antropic sur les systèmes d'agents https://www.anthropic.com/research/building-effective-agents défini les agents et les workflow Ne recommence pas les frameworks (LangChain, Amazon Bedrock AI Agent etc) le fameux débat sur l'abstraction Beaucoup de patterns implementable avec quelques lignes sans frameworks Plusieurs blocks de complexité croissante Augmented LLM (RAG, memory etc): Anthropic dit que les LLMs savent coordonner cela via MCP apr exemple Second: workflow prompt chaining : avec des gates et appelle les LLMs savent coordonner successivement ; favorise la precision vs la latence vu que les taches sont décomposées en plusieurs calls LLMs Workflow routing: classifie une entree et choisie la route a meilleure: separation de responsabilité Workflow : parallelisation: LLM travaillent en paralllele sur une tache et un aggregateur fait la synthèse. Paralleisaiton avec saucissonage de la tache ou voter sur le meilleur réponse Workflow : orchestrator workers: quand les taches ne sont pas bounded ou connues (genre le nombre de fichiers de code à changer) - les sous taches ne sont pas prédéfinies Workflow: evaluator optimizer: nun LLM propose une réponse, un LLM l'évalue et demande une meilleure réponse au besoin Agents: commande ou interaction avec l;humain puis autonome meme si il peut revenir demander des precisions à l'humain. Agents sont souvent des LLM utilisât des outil pour modifier l'environnement et réagir a feedback en boucle Ideal pour les problèmes ouverts et ou le nombre d'étapes n'est pas connu Recommende d'y aller avec une complexité progressive L'IA c'est pas donné https://techcrunch.com/2025/01/05/openai-is-losing-money-on-its-pricey-chatgpt-pro-plan-ceo-sam-altman-says/ OpenAI annonce que même avec des licenses à 200$/mois ils ne couvrent pas leurs couts associés… A quand l'explosion de la bulle IA ? Outillage Ghostty, un nouveau terminal pour Linux et macOS : https://ghostty.org/ Initié par Mitchell Hashimoto (hashicorp) Ghostty est un émulateur de terminal natif pour macOS et Linux. Il est écrit en Swift et utilise AppKit et SwiftUI sur macOS, et en Zig et utilise l'API GTK4 C sur Linux. Il utilise des composants d'interface utilisateur native et des raccourcis clavier et souris standard. Il prend en charge Quick Look, Force Touch et d'autres fonctionnalités spécifiques à macOS. Ghostty essaie de fournir un ensemble riche de fonctionnalités utiles pour un usage quotidien. Comment Pinterest utilise Honeycomb pour améliorer sa CI https://medium.com/pinterest-engineering/how-pinterest-leverages-honeycomb-to-enhance-ci-observability-and-improve-ci-build-stability–15eede563d75 Pinterest utilise Honeycomb pour améliorer l'observabilité de l'intégration continue (CI). Honeycomb permet à Pinterest de visualiser les métriques de build, d'analyser les tendances et de prendre des décisions basées sur les données. Honeycomb aide également Pinterest à identifier les causes potentielles des échecs de build et à rationaliser les tâches d'astreinte. Honeycomb peut également être utilisé pour suivre les métriques de build locales iOS aux côtés des détails de la machine, ce qui aide Pinterest à prioriser les mises à niveau des ordinateurs portables pour les développeurs. Méthodologies Suite à notre épisode sur les différents types de documentation, cet article parle des bonnes pratiques à suivre pour les tutoriels https://refactoringenglish.com/chapters/rules-for-software-tutorials/ Écrivez des tutoriels pour les débutants, en évitant le jargon et la terminologie complexe. Promettez un résultat clair dans le titre et expliquez l'objectif dans l'introduction. Montrez le résultat final tôt pour réduire les ambiguïtés. Rendez les extraits de code copiables et collables, en évitant les invites de shell et les commandes interactives. Utilisez les versions longues des indicateurs de ligne de commande pour plus de clarté. Séparez les valeurs définies par l'utilisateur de la logique réutilisable à l'aide de variables d'environnement ou de constantes nommées. Épargnez au lecteur les tâches inutiles en utilisant des scripts. Laissez les ordinateurs évaluer la logique conditionnelle, pas le lecteur. Maintenez le code en état de fonctionnement tout au long du tutoriel. Enseignez une chose par tutoriel et minimisez les dépendances. Les Wide events, un “nouveau” concept en observabilité https://jeremymorrell.dev/blog/a-practitioners-guide-to-wide-events/ un autre article https://isburmistrov.substack.com/p/all-you-need-is-wide-events-not-metrics L'idée est de logger des evenements (genre JSON log) avec le plus d'infos possible de la machine, la ram, la versiond e l'appli, l'utilisateur, le numero de build qui a produit l'appli, la derniere PR etc etc ca permet de filtrer et grouper by et de voir des correlations visuelles tres rapidement et de zoomer tiens les ventes baisses de 20% tiens en fait ca vient de l'appli andriod tiens aps correle a la version de l'appli mais la version de l'os si! le deuxieme article est facile a lire le premier est un guide d'usage exhaustif du concept Entre argumenter et se donner 5 minutes https://signalvnoise.com/posts/3124-give-it-five-minutes on veut souvent argumenter aka poser des questions en ayant déjà la reponse en soi emotionnellement mais ca amene beaucoup de verbiage donner 5 minutes à l'idée le temps d'y penser avant d'argumenter Loi, société et organisation Des juges fédéraux arrêtent le principe de la neutralité du net https://www.lemonde.fr/pixels/article/2025/01/03/les-etats-unis-reviennent-en-arriere-sur-le-principe-de-la-neutralite-du-net_6479575_4408996.html?lmd_medium=al&lmd_campaign=envoye-par-appli&lmd_creation=ios&lmd_source=default la neutralité du net c'est l'interdiction de traiter un paquet différemment en fonction de son émetteur Par exemple un paquet Netflix qui serait ralenti vs un paquet Amazon Donald trump est contre cette neutralité. À voir les impacts concrets dans un marché moins régulé. Rubrique débutant Un petit article sur les float vs les double en Java https://www.baeldung.com/java-float-vs-double 4 vs 8 bytes precision max de 7 vs 15 echele 10^38 vs 10^308 (ordre de grandeur) perf a peu pret similaire sauf peut etre pour des modeles d'IA qui vont privilegier une taille plus petite parfois attention overflow et les accumulation d'erreurs d'approximation BigDecimal Conférences La liste des conférences provenant de Developers Conferences Agenda/List par Aurélie Vache et contributeurs : 20 janvier 2025 : Elastic{ON} - Paris (France) 22–25 janvier 2025 : SnowCamp 2025 - Grenoble (France) 24–25 janvier 2025 : Agile Games Île-de-France 2025 - Paris (France) 6–7 février 2025 : Touraine Tech - Tours (France) 21 février 2025 : LyonJS 100 - Lyon (France) 28 février 2025 : Paris TS La Conf - Paris (France) 6 mars 2025 : DevCon #24 : 100% IA - Paris (France) 13 mars 2025 : Oracle CloudWorld Tour Paris - Paris (France) 14 mars 2025 : Rust In Paris 2025 - Paris (France) 19–21 mars 2025 : React Paris - Paris (France) 20 mars 2025 : PGDay Paris - Paris (France) 20–21 mars 2025 : Agile Niort - Niort (France) 25 mars 2025 : ParisTestConf - Paris (France) 26–29 mars 2025 : JChateau Unconference 2025 - Cour-Cheverny (France) 27–28 mars 2025 : SymfonyLive Paris 2025 - Paris (France) 28 mars 2025 : DataDays - Lille (France) 28–29 mars 2025 : Agile Games France 2025 - Lille (France) 3 avril 2025 : DotJS - Paris (France) 3 avril 2025 : SoCraTes Rennes 2025 - Rennes (France) 4 avril 2025 : Flutter Connection 2025 - Paris (France) 10–11 avril 2025 : Android Makers - Montrouge (France) 10–12 avril 2025 : Devoxx Greece - Athens (Greece) 16–18 avril 2025 : Devoxx France - Paris (France) 23–25 avril 2025 : MODERN ENDPOINT MANAGEMENT EMEA SUMMIT 2025 - Paris (France) 24 avril 2025 : IA Data Day 2025 - Strasbourg (France) 29–30 avril 2025 : MixIT - Lyon (France) 7–9 mai 2025 : Devoxx UK - London (UK) 15 mai 2025 : Cloud Toulouse - Toulouse (France) 16 mai 2025 : AFUP Day 2025 Lille - Lille (France) 16 mai 2025 : AFUP Day 2025 Lyon - Lyon (France) 16 mai 2025 : AFUP Day 2025 Poitiers - Poitiers (France) 24 mai 2025 : Polycloud - Montpellier (France) 5–6 juin 2025 : AlpesCraft - Grenoble (France) 5–6 juin 2025 : Devquest 2025 - Niort (France) 11–13 juin 2025 : Devoxx Poland - Krakow (Poland) 12–13 juin 2025 : Agile Tour Toulouse - Toulouse (France) 12–13 juin 2025 : DevLille - Lille (France) 17 juin 2025 : Mobilis In Mobile - Nantes (France) 24 juin 2025 : WAX 2025 - Aix-en-Provence (France) 25–27 juin 2025 : BreizhCamp 2025 - Rennes (France) 26–27 juin 2025 : Sunny Tech - Montpellier (France) 1–4 juillet 2025 : Open edX Conference - 2025 - Palaiseau (France) 7–9 juillet 2025 : Riviera DEV 2025 - Sophia Antipolis (France) 18–19 septembre 2025 : API Platform Conference - Lille (France) & Online 2–3 octobre 2025 : Volcamp - Clermont-Ferrand (France) 6–10 octobre 2025 : Devoxx Belgium - Antwerp (Belgium) 9–10 octobre 2025 : Forum PHP 2025 - Marne-la-Vallée (France) 16–17 octobre 2025 : DevFest Nantes - Nantes (France) 4–7 novembre 2025 : NewCrafts 2025 - Paris (France) 6 novembre 2025 : dotAI 2025 - Paris (France) 7 novembre 2025 : BDX I/O - Bordeaux (France) 12–14 novembre 2025 : Devoxx Morocco - Marrakech (Morocco) 23–25 avril 2026 : Devoxx Greece - Athens (Greece) 17 juin 2026 : Devoxx Poland - Krakow (Poland) Nous contacter Pour réagir à cet épisode, venez discuter sur le groupe Google https://groups.google.com/group/lescastcodeurs Contactez-nous via X/twitter https://twitter.com/lescastcodeurs ou Bluesky https://bsky.app/profile/lescastcodeurs.com Faire un crowdcast ou une crowdquestion Soutenez Les Cast Codeurs sur Patreon https://www.patreon.com/LesCastCodeurs Tous les épisodes et toutes les infos sur https://lescastcodeurs.com/

WARNING: This show features adult content and is intended only for individuals 18+ years of age.

WARNING: This show features adult content and is intended only for individuals 18+ years of age.

Japan's seasonally adjusted nominal gross domestic product fell below that of California for the first time in the second quarter of this year, NLI Research Institute, a private think tank in Tokyo, said Thursday.

Lula defende agro forte 'para causar raiva' em quem critica carne brasileira. E CCJ da Câmara aprova proposta que pode acabar com aborto legal no Brasil.  See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Competitividade da carne durantes as festividades pode ser maior, mas ainda deve ganhar a preferência do consumidor. Alerta fica para janeiro, com impostos pesando nas decisões de compra

O governo prepara as medidas do corte de gastos para equilibrar as contas públicas. E o clima de especulações levou o dólar ao valor mais alto da história em relação ao real. O ministro da Fazenda Fernando Haddad falou em isenção de Imposto de Renda na fonte para quem recebe até R$ 5 mil reais. No inquérito do golpe, a Polícia Federal afirmou que o ex-chefe da Abin Alexandre Ramagem sugeriu tirar autonomia de delegados. Em meio a uma crise na saúde, o secretário municipal de Goiânia é preso por suspeita de desvio de dinheiro público. O Supremo começou a julgar qual responsabilidade as redes sociais têm sobre conteúdos que usuários publicam. Salvador teve um volume recorde de chuva - com prejuízos e morte. Famílias libanesas e israelenses voltaram para casa no cessar-fogo entre Israel e o Hezbollah.

Yiğit Ihlamur, co-founder and general partner at Vela Partners, shares his unique venture capital approach, which combines data analysis with personal connections to identify exceptional founders. At Vela Partners, an algorithmic scan of companies helps narrow down investment choices, but final decisions hinge on assessing founder resilience and motivation during meetings. Yiğit explains that, typically, he has already decided to invest by the time he meets a founder; the meeting confirms his conviction. He also discusses AI's role in shaping the future of productivity tools and offers valuable advice to founders on preparation and authenticity when seeking investment.In this episode, you'll learn:[02:06] Yiğit's journey from Google to venture capital, and his unique approach to combining engineering and venture investing.[06:27] How Vela Partners integrates artificial intelligence and quant-driven algorithms to identify high-potential startups[10:21] The significance of a balanced quantitative and qualitative assessment in VC investing[12:41] How AI is enabling the next generation of productivity tools[19:08] Articulate your personal story, intrinsic motivation, and ability to articulate your commitment to solving a particular problem.[24:07] What should startups do to attract algorithm-driven funds like Vela Partners? [27:02] Slow decision-making pace in VC is a problemThe nonprofit organizations Yiğit is passionate about: American College Institute (ACI) in TurkeyAbout Yiğit IhlamurYiğit Ihlamur is a co-founder, general partner, and Chief Technology Officer at Vela Partners, a venture capital firm specializing in AI and product-led solutions. Prior to Vela, Yiğit had an impactful career at Google, where he led initiatives for Gmail, Chrome, and Google Workspace, focusing on product-led growth strategies such as self-service signups, activation, and pricing flows. Starting in Google's European headquarters, he initially worked on technical support for IT admins and created productivity tools for internal teams. Yiğit is passionate about advancing human productivity through technology. Outside his professional pursuits, he enjoys kitesurfing, skiing, running, and spending time with his family.About Vela PartnersVela Partners is a Silicon Valley-based venture capital firm specializing in product-led, AI-native startups from inception to Series A. Acting as an "AI startup investing in other AI startups," Vela leverages its proprietary AI to guide investment decisions and enhance its own returns. The firm's investor-focused tools drive its fund's performance, while self-service tools for entrepreneurs expand Vela's brand and distribution channels. Its portfolio includes innovative companies like Vieu, Cartken, Goooods, Nominal, LeakSignal, Base Operations, Cerby, Lightup, Vartana, and Axiom Cloud, among others.Subscribe to our podcast and stay tuned for our next episode.

Listen to Gil Alderete of Catholic Men's Fellowship (CMF) of California continue his broadcast from a men's spiritual warfare conference at Sacred Heart Church in Ventura.  In this episode, Gil continues his conversation with Deacon Charlie Echeverry about his journey from nominal Catholic to "on fire" deacon.Listen live to Gil's show Men of Faith at https://www.spiritfilledevents.com/radio-podcast Monday -Friday at and 12:30pm Pacific Time. Podcast is available https://www.spiritfilledevents.com/men-of-faith and other podcast outlets.APPLE LINK FOR APPGOOGLE PLAY LINK FOR APP

Listen to Gil Alderete of Catholic Men's Fellowship (CMF) of California continue his broadcast from a men's spiritual warfare conference at Sacred Heart Church in Ventura.  In this episode, Gil continues his conversation with Deacon Charlie Echeverry about his journey from nominal Catholic to "on fire" deacon.Listen live to Gil's show Men of Faith at https://www.spiritfilledevents.com/radio-podcast Monday -Friday at and 12:30pm Pacific Time. Podcast is available https://www.spiritfilledevents.com/men-of-faith and other podcast outlets.APPLE LINK FOR APPGOOGLE PLAY LINK FOR APP

In this episode, Bill Bellows and Andrew Stotz explore the intersection of variation and quality through awareness of the "Paradigms of Variation.” In a progression from acceptability to desirability, Bill created this 4-part model to offer economic insights for differentiating “Zero Defect” quality from “Loss Function" quality," with the aim of avoiding confusion between precision and accuracy when desirability is the choice.   Learn how to decide which paradigm your quality management system fits into! TRANSCRIPT 0:00:02.5 Andrew Stotz: My name is Andrew Stotz and I'll be your host as we dive deeper into the teachings of Dr. W. Edwards Deming. Today I'm continuing my discussion with Bill Bellows, who has spent 31 years helping people apply Dr. Deming's ideas to become aware of how their thinking is holding them back from their biggest opportunities. This is episode 7, The Paradigms of Variation. Bill, take it away.   0:00:30.3 Bill Bellows: Thank you, Andrew, and welcome to our listeners, as well as viewers, if you have access to the viewing version. Yeah, so I went back and listened to Episode 6. I'm going out bike riding 2-3 hours a day, so I listened to the podcast, listened to other things, stop and write down. Let me go write that down. And, so, we're going to pick up today on some major themes. And, what I keep coming back to is, is I think the difference between acceptability and desirability is the difference between how most companies operate and how a company inspired by Dr. Deming would operate.   0:01:29.3 BB: And, I just think of, if there was no difference between the two, then... Well, lemme even back up. I mentioned last time we were talking about why my wife and I buy Toyotas. And, yes, we've had one terrible buy, which I continue to talk about. [laughter] And, it's fun because it's just a reminder that even a company like Toyota can deliver a really lousy product, which we were unfortunate to have purchased. And, we're not the only ones that, and they've rebounded and they've apologized, they've had issues. There's no doubt about that. They have issues, but they have notably been inspired by Dr. Deming.   0:02:30.6 BB: The one thing I brought up last time was relative on this thinking of acceptability, desirability, where acceptability is looking at things and saying it's a quality system of good and bad. It's acceptable, which is good and unacceptable is not good. And, that's how most organizations view quality. Again, the focus of this series is Misunderstanding Quality. Our previous series was broadly looking at implications for Dr. Deming's ideas. And, here our focus is quality. And, so what I'm trying to get across here is quality management, traditional quality management.   0:03:17.4 BB: In most organizations, in all organizations I've ever interacted with is acceptability basis, good parts and bad parts. It's a measurement system of it meets requirements, we ship it, if it meets requirements, we buy it. And, I'm not saying there's anything wrong with that, but I don't think a system focused on acceptability can explain... To me, it does not explain the incredible reliability I have personally experienced in Toyota products.   0:03:46.9 BB: Now, I'm working with a graduate student and I wanna pursue that as a research topic in the spring, 'cause for all I know, the reliability of components in all cars has improved. I don't know if it's, I only by Toyota, 'cause so this woman I've met recently and I'm mentoring her and we're working on a research project. And, I thought recently, I'd like... And, I'm not sure how to do this, but I just know, I think I've mentioned I worked at my father's gas station back in the '70s and I remember replacing water pumps and alternators and all this stuff. This was before Japanese cars were everywhere. There were Japanese cars, but not like you see today.   0:04:33.3 BB: And, so I'm just used to all those components being routinely replaced. And, all I know is I don't routinely replace anything but the battery and the tires and change the oil. I think that's about it. Everything else is pretty good. But, I do think the differentiation between Toyota and most other companies is their appreciation of desirability and how to manage desirability. And, that's why I keep coming back to this as a theme for these sessions. And, what I think is a differentiation between a Deming view of quality and all other views of quality. What I tried to say last time is I just give you indications of a focus on acceptability. It's a quality system which looks at things that are good or things that are bad. It's, last time we talked about category thinking. It's black and white thinking. If the parts are good, then the mindset, if they're good, then they fit.   0:05:38.4 BB: Well, with a focus on continuum thinking, then you have the understanding that there's variation in good. And, that leads to variation in fit and variation in performance. And, that's a sense of things are relatively good, not absolutely good, whereas black and white category thinking is acceptability. They're all good. And, if they're all good, then they should all fit. I was, when I was at Rocketdyne, met, and the one thing I wanted to point out is... Again, as I said in the past, so much of what I'm sharing with the audience and people I've met through these podcasts or people I'm mentoring, helping them bring these ideas to their respective organizations or their consultants, whatever it is.   0:06:29.0 BB: And, so I like to provide examples in here for things for them to go off and try. You at the end of each podcast encourage them to reach out to me, a number of them have, and from that I've learned a great deal. And, so one guy was... A guy I was working with at Rocketdyne, he was at a site that did final assembly of rocket engine components. And, so one thing I'd say is the people who... And for those listening, if you wanna find people in your organization that would really value the difference between an acceptability focus and a desirability focus, find the people that do assembly, find the people that put things together. 'Cause the ones that machine the holes, they think all the holes are good. People that make the tubes, all the tubes are good. But, find the people that are trying to put the tubes into the holes. Those are the people I loved working with because they were the ones that felt the difference every day.   0:07:31.1 BB: And, so I was in a workshop for a week or so. And there's two people ahead of me. They came from this final assembly operation of Rocketdyne. And, during a break, I was trying to clarify some of the things I had said and I used, I shared with them an example of how when we focused on not the tubes by themselves or the holes by themselves, that we focused on how well the tubes go into the holes, which has a lot to do with the clearance between them and the idea that nobody owns the clearance. One person owns one part, one owns another. And, what we realized is if we focused on the relationship, what a big difference it made. So I'm explaining it to him and he turns to me and he says, he's like, "Oh, my God," he says, "I've got hundreds of turbine blades and a bunch of turbine wheels and the blades slide into the wheel." And he says, "I can't get the blades onto the wheel."   0:08:31.0 BB: And I said, "But they're all good." He says, "They're all good." But he said, "Well, what you're now explaining to me is why they don't go together. Why I have this headache." So I said, "Well, do you know where the blades come from?" He says, "yeah". And I said, "Do you know where the wheels come from?" He says, "yeah". I said, "Well, why don't you call them up and talk to them?" He says, "There's no reason for a phone call 'cause all they're going to say is, "Why are you calling me? They're all good." So, he just walked away with his head exploding 'cause he's got all these things.   0:09:05.8 BB: And, so I use that for our listeners is if you want to find people that would really resonate with the difference between acceptable and desirable, talk to the people that have to put things together. There you will find... And, so my strategy was, get them smart. Now they have to be patient with the people upstream 'cause the people upstream are not deliberately doing what they're doing to them. So, what you don't want to do is have them get... You want their consciousness to go up but you now wanna use them to talk to the component people. Now you've got a conversation. Otherwise, the component people say, "Why are you talking to me? Everything I do is good."   0:09:51.6 BB: So, I just want to talk at this point, just to reinforce that I think there's something going on with Toyota that is very intentional about managing desirability when it makes sense using acceptability. So, it's a choice. And, so indications of a focus on desirability is when you look at options that are acceptable and you say, "Of all these apples, I want this one. It's the ripest. Of all these donuts, I want this one. It's got the most sprinkles. Of all these parking spots, I want this one. It's a little bit wider than the other. I want this surgeon. I want this professor for this course."   0:10:33.8 BB: All right. So, what we're saying "is of all the choices, I want this one". So, some new ideas I want to get into tonight are the Paradigms of Variation A, B, C, D, and E. Paradigm A we looked at in the past. That's just acceptability. Does it meet requirements or not? The quality focus is achieving zero defects. And tonight I want to get into B and C. The next time we'll look at D and E. In explaining these ideas recently to someone who listened to one of our previous podcasts and were focusing on, he started asking about decision making. And that got me thinking about, of course, I took years ago decision making with Kepner and Tregoe. And there they talk about decisions. We're gonna look, we're gonna go buy a car, go buy a house. We're gonna make a decision.   0:11:29.4 BB: And, once you decide on the decision, you then list the criteria of the decision. And you come up with all the things you want in this decision. And then you look at each of them and you say, "is it a must or a want"? And let's say you're looking at houses. It could be a lot of houses to go look at. What makes this focus on acceptability, it's musts and wants. And must is very much acceptability. So you say: "We're looking for a house that must be one story, it must be in the middle of the block. The house must be in the middle of the block. It must have four bedrooms, must have two bathrooms". So now when you're looking at all these houses, acceptability says "I'm only gonna look at the ones that meet those requirements". And, so now the strategy is to go from hundreds of options down to an order of magnitude less.   0:12:25.1 BB: Now we're going to get it down to maybe 20. Now you look at the wants. So you've got an original list of all the things, the criteria, and you look at each one and say, "is it a must, is it a want"? And what I've just said is the first screening is all the ones that pass the must get into the next category. Well, with the Kepner-Tregoe folks, they talk about must, which is acceptability, and the wants are about desirability.   0:12:51.4 BB: And then here it ties into Dr. Taguchi's mindset, and we'll look at Taguchi in a future session. Taguchi looks at a characteristic of quality, such as the diameter of a hole, the performance of an automobile, miles per gallon. And he says, in terms of desirability, there's three different targets. There is desirability, I want the smallest possible value. So, if you're buying a house, it could be, I want the lowest possible electric bills where zero is the goal. It's not gonna be zero, but I'm looking, of all the ones that pass the must, now I'm looking at all the houses, and I'm saying "I want the lowest possible electric bill". That's a Smaller-is-Best.   0:13:35.9 BB: Larger-is-Best is I want something which is as big as possible. It could be I want the most roof facing the sun, in case I put solar in. That's a Larger-is-Best characteristic, where Taguchi would say the ideal is infinity, but the bigger, the better, as opposed to Smaller-is-Better. And, the other characteristic is what Taguchi calls Nominal-is-Best, is I have an ideal single value in mind. And in each case, the reason I point that out is that desirability is about going past acceptability and saying amongst all the things that are acceptable, I want the smallest, I want the largest, or I want this. It is a preference for one of those.   0:14:19.4 BB: So, I thought... I was using that to explain to this friend the other day, and I thought that would be nice to tie in here. That desirability is a focus on of all the things that meet requirements, now I want to go one step further. That's just not enough. All right, so now let's get into Paradigms B and C. And I want to use an exercise we used in the first series. And, the idea for our audience is imagine a quality characteristic having a lower requirement, a minimum, otherwise known as the lower spec, the lower tolerance. So, there's a minimum value, and then there's a maximum value. And, when I do this in my classes, I say "let's say the quality characteristic is the outer diameter of a tube." And, then so what I'd like the audience to appreciate is we've got a min and a max.   0:15:18.9 BB: And, then imagine your job as listener is to make the decision as to who to buy from. And. let's say we've got two suppliers that are ready to provide us with their product, these tubes that we're gonna buy. And, your job as a listener is to make the decision as to who to buy from. Who are we going to buy from? And, so we go off and we tell them, "Here's the min, here's the max," and they come back. And, they each give us a distribution. And, so what I'd like the audience to think about is a distribution. Just think very simply of two normal distributions, two Gaussian distributions. And, let's say the first distribution goes all the way from the min to the max. It takes up the entire range.   0:16:08.5 AS: So wide and flat.   0:16:12.1 BB: Wide and flat. That's supplier one. And supplier two, let's say is maybe three quarters of the way over. It's incredibly uniform. It uses a very small fraction of the tolerance. So that's tall and narrow. That's distribution two as opposed to wide and flat. So, imagine we've got those two to buy from. But imagine also, and this is a highly idealized scenario. And, I use this and this is why I want to share it with our audience. Because it becomes a great way of diving into what I think is a lot of confusion about meeting requirements. And, so what I want you to imagine is that no matter who you buy from, they both promise that they will deliver at the same price per tube.   0:17:00.8 BB: So, no matter who you buy from, price-wise, they are identical. To which I'd say that's highly idealized, but that's a given. Criteria number two, the delivery rates are the same. So, we cannot differentiate on delivery. We cannot differentiate on price. The third condition we find out is that everything they deliver meets requirements, 100%. So, if there is any scrap and rework, they don't ship that to us. So, everything they deliver meets requirements. And, again, that's highly idealized.   0:17:41.6 BB: Number four is the distributions are in control. And, that means that the processes are predictable and stable. And, that's guaranteed. So, imagine these distributions day by day every order is the same shape, the same average, the same amount of variation. Also, it will never change. It will never change. And, the other thing I want to point out in this fourth point here is that your job as the buyer is to buy these. They are used as is within our organization. , 0:18:15.5 BB: And, the fifth point is that there's a min and a max. And, so I've been using this exercise for, gosh, going back to 1995, and I throw it out there and then I show them the distributions. I say "same price, same schedule, delivery rate, everything meets requirements, distributions never change shape or location. You're going to use as is. And there's the min, there's the max. Who do you buy from?" And, I give people not only do we buy from one or two, but I also say I'll give you a third option.   0:18:51.5 BB: The third option is it doesn't matter. It doesn't matter. So, what I find is that three quarters of the audience will take distribution two, the narrow one. And when I ask them, why do you like distribution two? They say, "because it has less variation". I then say, "From what?" Then they say, "From each other." And, that's what a standard deviation is, variation from each other. So roughly 75% plus and minus...   [overlapping conversation]   0:19:25.8 AS: When you say of each other, you're talking about each other curve or each other item in the...   0:19:31.3 BB: Each other tube.  So, the amount of variation from all the tubes are close together, so the variation from each other.   0:19:38.6 AS: Okay. Each item. Yeah, okay.   0:19:41.8 BB: Standard deviation is the average variation from the average value. So, when I ask them, why do you like two? Okay, and then I asked the ones who take the wide one in the middle, I say, "why do you like that one," and they say because... And, actually, we'll come back to that. This is pretty funny. They will take that, but a very small percent say it doesn't matter, and here's what's interesting, if I didn't show the distributions, if all I did was say there's two suppliers out there, the same price, same schedule, that guarantee zero defects, the results will never change. Here's the min, here's the max, I'm willing to bet if I didn't show the distributions, people would say "it doesn't matter, I'll take either one". But, as soon as I show them the distributions, they want the narrow one. And, I use this for our attendees, this is a great way to show people that they really don't believe in tolerances, 'cause as soon as you go past meeting requirements, what you're really saying is, there's a higher bar.   0:21:05.6 AS: Okay, so requirements would be... Or, tolerances would be the extremes of that flat, wide curve. And, any one of those outcomes meets the tolerance.   0:21:17.5 BB: Yes, and so for companies that are striving to meet requirements, why is it when I give you two distributions that meet requirements... Why is it when I show you the distributions, and I'm willing to bet if I don't show you the distributions and all you know is they're 100% good, then you say "well, it doesn't matter," Well then what changes when I show you the distributions?   0:21:43.6 AS: I know why I'd choose the narrow one.   0:21:48.1 BB: Go ahead.   0:21:49.1 AS: I know how damn hard it is to reduce variation and I forget about any tolerance of anything, if I have two companies that show me a wide distribution, and another one shows me a narrow one, and let's say it's accurate. I'm much more impressed with how a company can do the same exact output as another company, the same product that they're trying to deliver, but they are producing a much more narrow range of outcome, which could be that they just have automation in their production line and the other one has manual.   0:22:27.4 BB: And, I have seen that within Rocketdyne, I've seen processes do that. I have seen the wide become the narrow through automation. Yeah. Okay, so hold that thought then. So, what I do in my graduate classes is I show that... Not only do I give them two options, I give them four options. So, I throw in two other distributions, but really what it comes down to is the wide one versus the narrow one, and then the other two, I throw in there that usually aren't taken, they're distractions. All right, so what I'll do in a graduate class in quality management is to show that and get the results I just showed. If I present the same exercise and then say, "imagine the average value of distribution one, the middle of distribution one, imagine that is the ideal value".   0:23:24.7 AS: That, you're talking about the wide and flat.   0:23:28.4 BB: Yes. So, all I do is I go back to the entire exercise and now I add in a line at the average of the wide distribution, and then go through and ask one more time, who would you take.   0:23:46.3 AS: So, now the dilemma that the listener has is that now we have a, within limits, within tolerances, we have a wide but flat distribution that's centered on the middle point between the upper and lower tolerance.   0:24:06.4 BB: Yeah, yes.   0:24:08.8 AS: And, then we have... Go ahead.   0:24:11.7 BB: Well, yeah, that is distribution one, same as the first part, we went through this, and all I'm doing now is saying, "imagine the average value of the middle is said to be the ideal value".   0:24:29.4 AS: And, now you're gonna tell us that the narrow one is not on that central or ideal value.   0:24:36.2 BB: No, that is still where it is at the three-quarter point, all I've done is now said, this is desirability. I'm now saying "that is the ideal value, that is the target, that is the value we prefer". And, people still take the narrowest distribution number two.   0:24:58.8 AS: I wouldn't take the narrow one because I would think that the company would have to prove to me that they can shift that narrow curve.   0:25:06.6 BB: Well, okay, and I'm glad you brought that up because according to the explanation I gave of equal price, equal schedule, meets requirements. I deliberately put in the criteria that you have to use them as is. So, now I'm forcing people to choose between the narrowest one over there at the three-quarter point, and the wide one on target. And, there's no doubt if I gave them the option of taking the narrow distribution and sliding it over, they would. Every single person would do that. But, when I give you a choice of, okay, now what? So, two things here, one is, is it calling out the ideal of value, 'cause desirability is not just beyond acceptability, it is saying, "I desire this value, I want this parking spot, I want this apple, I want this value". And, that's something we've been alluding to earlier, but that's what I wanna call out today is that...   0:26:13.7 BB: So, in other words, when I presented the exercise of the two distributions, without calling out what's desirable, all I'm doing is saying they're both acceptable, which do you prefer? But, instead of saying it doesn't matter, I'd like the narrowest one, and it may well be what people are doing is exactly what you're saying is the narrowest one seems better and easily could be for what you explained.   0:26:40.8 BB: But, what's interesting is, even when I call out what's desirable as the value, people will take the narrowest distribution, and so now what I wanna add to our prior conversation is Paradigm A, acceptability, the Paradigm A response would be, it doesn't matter. Choosing the narrowest one, otherwise known as precision, we're very precisely hitting that value, small standard deviation, that's what I refer to as Paradigm B, piece-to -piece consistency. Paradigm C is desirability being on the ideal value, that's piece-to-target consistency. And, in Dr. Taguchi's work, what he's talking about is the impact downstream of not just looking at the tubes, but when you look at how the tubes are inserted into a hole, perhaps, then what he's saying is that the reason you would call out the desirable value is what you're saying is how this tube integrates in a bigger system matters, which is why I want this value.   0:27:54.2 AS: Okay, so let's go back, A, meet requirements, that's acceptability. Anything within those tolerances we can accept. B is a narrow distribution, what you called precision or piece-to -piece consistency. And what was C?   0:28:12.8 BB: C is, I'll take the wide distribution where the average value is on target, that's piece- to-target consistency. Otherwise known as accuracy.   0:28:27.3 AS: Okay. Target consistency, otherwise known as accuracy. All right, and then precision around D is precision around the ideal value.   0:28:37.7 BB: Well, for those that want to take the narrowest one and slide it over, what you're now doing is saying, "I'm gonna start with precision, and I'm going to focus on the ideal". Now, what you're doing is saying, "step one is precision, step two is accuracy".   0:28:56.4 AS: Okay. And step three or D?   0:29:00.9 BB: Paradigm D?   0:29:02.7 AS: Yeah.   0:29:02.7 BB: Is that what you're... Yeah. Paradigm D would be the ability to produce, to move the distribution as needed to different locations.   0:29:17.4 AS: The narrow distribution?   0:29:18.9 BB: Yes, and so I'll give you an example in terms of, let's say tennis, Paradigm A in tennis is just to get the ball across the net. I just wanna get it somewhere on the other side of the court, right. Now that may be okay if you and I are neighbors, but that doesn't get us into professional level. Paradigm B, is I can hit it consistently to one place on your side of the court. Now, I can't control that location, but boy, I can get that location every single time. Next thing you know, you know exactly where the ball is going, and that's Paradigm B.  Paradigm C is I can move it to where I want it to go, which you will eventually figure out, so I can control where it goes. Paradigm D is I can consistently hit any side of the court on the fly.   0:30:11.0 BB: So, Paradigm D is I can take that narrow distribution and move it around for different customers, different applications, and Dr. Taguchi refers to that as Technology Development, and what Taguchi is talking about is developing a technology which has incredible precision in providing your sales people the ability to move the next move it to accuracy and to sell that product by tuning it to different customers as you would in sports, move the ball around to the other side of the court. So now you're going to the point that you've got incredible precision, and now you've got “on demand accuracy,” that's Paradigm D.  Paradigm C is I can do one-size-fits-all which is, which may be all you need for the application.   0:31:06.9 AS: I wanna separate the Paradigm B, the narrow distribution and that's precision around some value versus Paradigm D is precision around the ideal value.   0:31:20.7 BB: And, the idea is that desirability is about an ideal value. And, so if we're talking piece-to-piece consistency, that means it's uniform, but I'm not paying attention to... I have a value in mind that I want. And that's the difference between Dr. Taguchi's work, I mean, it's the ability to be precise. Again, accuracy, desirability is I have an ideal value in mind. And acceptability is it doesn't really matter.  Precision is uniformity without accuracy. And so, if you are... What Dr. Taguchi is talking about is, is depending on how what you're delivering integrates, being consistent may cause the person downstream to consistently need a hammer to get the tube into the hole.   0:32:24.2 BB: So, it's consistent, but what you're now saying, what Taguchi is saying is, if you pay attention to where you are within requirement, which is desirability, then you can improve integration. And, that is my explanation for why Toyota's products have incredibly reliability, that they are focusing on integration, not just uniformity and precision by itself.   0:32:49.8 AS: I would love to put this in the context of a dart thrower. The Paradigm A meeting requirability or acceptability, they stand way behind and they throw and they hit the overall dart board.   0:33:04.3 BB: Dart board. It's on the board. Yes.   0:33:07.2 AS: And, the narrow distribution is, well, they hit the same spot over to the left, right towards the edge, they hit that spot consistently. And, then basically, I'm gonna jump to D just because I'm imagining that I'm just gonna ask the guy, Hey, can you just move over just a little bit, and I'mma move them over about a half a foot, and when I do, you're gonna start throwing that dart right at the same location, but over to the right, meaning at the target. The center of the dart...   0:33:43.9 BB: The bull's eye. Yeah. Yeah, well, that's... And you call that C or D?   0:33:47.6 AS: I call that D.   0:33:49.5 BB: No, I would say, let's call that C being on target, meaning that C is, for games of darts where the most points are being on the bull's eye, that's Paradigm C.   0:34:04.0 AS: So accuracy, yeah.   0:34:05.4 BB: Paradigm D would be a game in which the ideal value changes. So now, okay, now I watch the... When I play darts, I'm sure there's lots of darts games, but one game we used to play it in our cellar at home was baseball. So, the dart board is divided into has numbers one, two, three through, and you'd go to... There'd be a wedge number one, a wedge number two, a wedge number three, that's Paradigm D that I could hit the different wedges on demand. But that's what it is. So A is anywhere in. B is consistent, precision, but again, the idea is if you can move that, but now what we're talking about is, is there an impulse to move it or are we happy just being precise? What Taguchi's talking about is the value proposition of desirability is to take precision, take that uniformity and move it to the ideal value, and what you've just done and doing so, you're now focusing on not this characteristic in isolation, you're now focusing on how this characteristic meshes with another characteristic. And, it's not just one thing in isolation, one thing in isolation does not give you a highly reliable automobile.   0:35:38.9 AS: Is there anything you wanna add to that, or are you ready to sum it up?   0:35:45.0 BB: No, that's it. The big summation is, we've been building up to the contrast between acceptable and desirable. I just wanted to add some more fidelity. Desirable is I have a value in mind, which Dr. Taguchi referred to as a target. So, for people at home, in the kitchen, the target value could be exactly one cup of flour. We talked earlier about our daughter, when she worked in a coffee shop and then, and at home she'd give us these recipes for making coffee and it'd be dad, exactly this amount of coffee and exactly that. And, we had a scale, it wasn't just anywhere between. She'd say "dad, you have to get a scale." I mean she was... We started calling her the coffee snob, 'cause it was very, this amount, this amount. So, in the kitchen then it's about precisely one cup. Precisely one this. And that's desirability.   0:36:40.6 AS: And, I was just thinking, the best word for that is bull's eye!   0:36:48.3 BB: Yes.   0:36:48.8 AS: You hit it right on the spot.   0:36:50.6 BB: Yeah.   0:36:51.6 AS: Great. Well, Bill, on behalf of everyone at The Deming Institute, I wanna thank you again for this discussion. It was not only acceptable, it was desirable. For listeners, remember to go to deming.org to continue your journey. And, if you want to keep in touch with Bill, just find him on LinkedIn. He'll reply. This is your host, Andrew Stotz, and I leave you with one of my favorite quotes from Dr. Deming, "people are entitled to joy in work."

Ekonomist Haluk Bürümcekçi ile Merkez Bankası'nın döviz stratejisindeki değişimini, 2025 bütçesinin detaylarını ve Kasım'ın ilk haftasında takip edilmesi gereken önemli gelişmeleri konuştuk.Bu bölümümüzde söz ettiğimiz Midas Podcast'in 'Küçük yatırımcı borsada kazanabilir mi?' başlıklı podcast bölümüne dinleyicilerimiz aşağıdaki linkten ulaşabilirler:https://open.spotify.com/episode/51LvHBi1s9CAEJI79GFBzA

Listen to Gil Alderete of Catholic Men's Fellowship (CMF) of California continue his broadcast from a men's spiritual warfare conference at Sacred Heart Church in Ventura.  In this episode, Gil interviews Deacon Charlie Echeverry about his journey from nominal Catholic to "on fire" deacon.Listen live to Gil's show Men of Faith at https://www.spiritfilledevents.com/radio-podcast Monday -Friday at and 12:30pm Pacific Time. Podcast is available https://www.spiritfilledevents.com/men-of-faith and other podcast outlets.APPLE LINK FOR APPGOOGLE PLAY LINK FOR APP

#SPACEX: Private spacewalkers nominal. Bob Zimmerman BehindtheBlack.com 1941

NASA: JPL: Voyager 1 nominal. Bob Zimmerman BehindtheBlack.com 1940

Carlos Alsina reflexiona en su monólogo sobre las declaraciones de la ministra de Hacienda, María Jesús Montero, asegurando que el nuevo modelo de financiación para Cataluña no es un 'concierto' económico, a pesar de que fue así como ella misma se refirió a esta propuesta que hizo Esquerra hace meses.

A new MP3 sermon from Grace Audio Treasures is now available on SermonAudio with the following details: Title: The great mass of nominal Christians are nothing but unconverted worldlings! Speaker: Charles Simeon Broadcaster: Grace Audio Treasures Event: Devotional Date: 8/30/2024 Bible: John 1:15; 2 Corinthians 6:17-18 Length: 3 min.

Another penetrating and challenging gem by Charles Simeon-

Another penetrating and challenging gem by Charles Simeon!

Another penetrating and challenging gem by Charles Simeon-

Carola Binder is an associate professor of civic leadership and economics at the University of Texas at Austin, and she is the author of a new book titled, *Shock Values: Prices and Inflation in American Democracy.* Carola is also a returning guest to the podcast, and she rejoins David on Macro Musings to talk about this book and some recent work she has done on the Fed's framework review. David and Carola specifically discuss the history of inflation in the US, the advantages of adopting a nominal GDP targeting regime, what to expect from the Fed's upcoming framework review, and more.   Transcript for this week's episode.   Carola's Twitter: @cconces Carola's website   David Beckworth's Twitter: @DavidBeckworth Follow us on Twitter: @Macro_Musings   Check out our new AI chatbot: the Macro Musebot! Join the new Macro Musings Discord server!   Join the Macro Musings mailing list! Check out our Macro Musings merch!   Related Links:   *Shock Values: Prices and Inflation in American Democracy* by Carola Binder   *Why Do We Dislike Inflation?* by Stefanie Stantcheva   Timestamps:   (00:00:00) – Intro   (00:03:42) – *Nominal GDP Targeting: Lessons from Recent History*   (00:12:18) – NGDP Level Targeting: Looking Through Supply Shocks and Policy Communication   (00:17:16) – *Shock Values: Prices and Inflation in American Democracy*   (00:21:44) – The History of Inflation and Deflation in the US   (00:30:30) – Key Lessons from the Revolutionary War and Civil War Periods   (00:35:37) – The Impact of Price Controls During World War II   (00:40:42) – The Emergence of Price Stability: From the Great Inflation Period to the Present   (00:46:24) – The Direction of the Fed's Framework Review   (00:49:22) – Outro

This episode was produced remotely using the ListenDeck standardized audio & video production system. If you're looking to jumpstart your podcast miniseries or upgrade your podcast or video production please visit www.ListenDeck.com. You can subscribe to this podcast and stay up to date on all the stories here on Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Stitcher, Spotify, Amazon and iHeartRadio. In this episode, the host John Siracusa had a remote chat with Guy Leibovitz Co-founder & CEO of Nominal. Nominal is a next-gen ERP system.  In this episode they discuss Guy's past experience as a multi exited entrepreneur, the competitive landscape of ERP systems and challenges of developing a general ledger system.  Subscribe now on Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Stitcher, Spotify, Amazon and iHeartRadio to hear next Thursdays episode with John Mitchell from Episode Six. About the host: John is the founder of ListenDeck a full-service podcast and video production company, which has produced over 1500 episodes of various podcasts. He is the host of the ‘Bank On It' podcast, which features over 600 episodes starring high profile fintech leaders and entrepreneurs. Follow John on LinkedIn, Twitter, Medium  

James Bullard was the president and CEO of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis from 2008 to 2023, and he is currently the dean of the Mitchell E. Daniels Jr. School of Business at Purdue University. James is also a previous guest of the show, and he rejoins David on Macro Musings to talk about his time at the Fed, FAIT, and the upcoming Fed framework review. Specifically, James and David also discuss how to improve the FOMC's economic reporting, the case for implementing nominal GDP targeting, the future of R-star, and much more.   Transcript for this week's episode.   James's St. Louis Fed bio James's Purdue University profile   David Beckworth's Twitter: @DavidBeckworth Follow us on Twitter: @Macro_Musings   Check out our new AI chatbot: the Macro Musebot! Join the new Macro Musings Discord server!   Join the Macro Musings mailing list! Check out our Macro Musings merch!   Related Links:   *R-Star Wars: The Phantom Menace* - A presentation by James Bullard at the 34th Annual National Association for Business Economics (NABE) Economic Policy Conference   *Demand Shocks as Technology Shocks* by Yan Bai, Jose-Victor Rios-Rull, and Kjetil Storesletten   Timestamps:   (00:00:00) – Intro   (00:03:10) – Defining the St. Louis Fed and Bullard's Fed Tenure   (00:09:58) – Comparing FAIT and Nominal GDP Targeting   (00:15:55) – Assessing the Current FAIT Framework   (00:25:37) – Evaluating the Recent V-Shaped Recovery   (00:29:28) – What to Expect from the Upcoming Fed Framework Review   (00:33:31) – Improving the FOMC's Economic Reporting   (00:37:46) – The Case for Nominal GDP Targeting   (00:50:24) – The Future of R-Star   (00:53:52) – Outro

This episode was produced remotely using the ListenDeck standardized audio & video production system. If you're looking to jumpstart your podcast miniseries or upgrade your podcast or video production please visit www.ListenDeck.com. You can subscribe to this podcast and stay up to date on all the stories here on Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Stitcher, Spotify, Amazon and iHeartRadio. In this episode, the host John Siracusa had a remote chat with Magnus Larsson Co-founder & CEO of Majority.  Majority is a platform for empowering immigrants through financial services and community support. Throughout their interview they discussed the hardships immigrants face, like gaining financial credibility, and from Magnus's own experiences as a Swedish immigrant in the U.S. and they discussed Majority's growth strategy and the exciting future that brings.  Subscribe now on Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Stitcher, Spotify, Amazon and iHeartRadio to hear next Thursdays episode with Guy Leibovitz from Nominal. About the host: John is the founder of ListenDeck a full-service podcast and video production company, which has produced over 1500 episodes of various podcasts. He is the host of the ‘Bank On It' podcast, which features over 600 episodes starring high profile fintech leaders and entrepreneurs. Follow John on LinkedIn, Twitter, Medium

Brad Klassen • Revelation 3:1–3:6 • Commissioned

The US provides the main data releases. JOLTS data on job vacancies is expected to continue to decline. The initial surge in vacancies in 2021 was strongly influenced by labor market churn. As that subsided, vacancy rates fell. Nominal wage growth continues to slow, which argues against a tight labor market.

This is a goodbye to the Nominal Tales, but do not worry, for it is also the formal invitation to join several of the Nominal's founders at the new show: The Fyreside Fables, which launches very soon!

Brad Klassen • Revelation 3:1–3:6 • Commissioned

#MERCURY: ESA's BepiColombo not nominal. Bob Zimmerman BehindtheBlack.com https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/potentially-serious-problem-on-bepicolombo-mercury-mission/ 1957 Sputnik

#Taiwan: Earthquake. TSMC reported nominal. Stephen Yates, chair of the America First Policy Institute's new China Policy Initiative,@GordonGChang, Gatestone, Newsweek, The Hill: https://www.reuters.com/world/taiwan-told-vacate-embassy-honduras-after-ties-severed-2023-03-27/  1910 Taiwan indigenous village

#JAPAN: JAXA moon lander SLIM nominal after 2 lunar nights. Bob Zimmerman BehindtheBlack.com https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/slim-survives-its-second-lunar-night-re-establishes-contact/ 2014 OVER GERMANY

Hasu and Jon bring on Ansgar and Caspar from the Ethereum Foundation to discuss the ETH staking endgame.    Ansgar and Caspar recently published two controversial research posts which included a proposal to change Ethereum's issuance curve. They are concerned that the current ETH staking economics could lead to nearly 100% of ETH being staked, with much of that in LSTs. They propose reducing issuance and targeting a lower stake rate.   We go deep in this episode on PoS economics, liquid staking, restaking, economic security, centralization concerns, and much more. __ Timestamps: (00:00) Intro (00:25) Possible Changes to ETH Staking?   (00:49) Overview of Current ETH Staking (16:32) LSTs & Staking Rate Increasing         (21:36) Nominal vs Real Yield (23:22) Tax Implications of Staking (27:57) Staking Demand & External Revenue (35:33) Stake Ratio Targeting (36:21) Is 100% Staking Bad? (40:05) Can ETH LSTs be Money? (55:24) Would Any Changes Make a Difference? (01:04:05) Stake Targeting (01:10:20) Will Targeting Centralize Validators? (01:22:53) Fiat Money Parallels          (01:25:16) MEV & Restaking Revenue           (01:30:52) Electra Proposal to Change Issuance (01:46:01) Security Budget & Economic Security       (01:53:40) Validator Set Quality          (01:55:10) Incentives to Maximize Validator Decentralization (02:19:00) PoS vs PoW Political Complexity __ Twitter: Hasu - https://twitter.com/hasufl Jon Charbonneau - https://twitter.com/jon_charb Uncommon Core 2.0 - https://twitter.com/UCC2_xyz Ansgar - https://twitter.com/adietrichs Caspar - https://twitter.com/casparschwa __ Referenced Materials: Endgame Staking Economics: A Case for Targeting - https://ethresear.ch/t/endgame-staking-economics-a-case-for-targeting/18751 Electra: Issuance Curve Adjustment Proposal - https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/electra-issuance-curve-adjustment-proposal/18825 Properties of issuance level: consensus incentives and variability across potential reward curves - https://ethresear.ch/t/properties-of-issuance-level-consensus-incentives-and-variability-across-potential-reward-curves/18448 __ Disclaimer: The material and information presented in this podcast is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered investment advice. The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed in this podcast are solely those of the speakers and are not the views of any entity or other person with whom the speaker is affiliated, including, without limitation, DBA Crypto, LLC. The “DBA Crypto” name and all forms thereof are the sole property of its owner, and its use does not imply endorsement of or opposition to any specific organization, product, or service.

#MOON: Upside Down SLIM nominal communication established. Bob Zimmerman BehindtheBlack.com https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/communications-with-slim-lunar-lander-re-established/ 1930