Podcasts about energy policies

Willie Phillips is the former chairman of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and now a partner at Holland & Knight. During his time at FERC, Phillips helped lead major reforms to transmission planning and the electric grid's interconnection process. He now advises the companies and utilities he once regulated, giving him a unique perspective on how developers can navigate the regulatory system. In this episode of Inevitable, Phillips explains how FERC works, what companies routinely get wrong when engaging with regulators, and why early participation and pre-filing conversations can dramatically improve the odds of success. He also breaks down the Supreme Court's overturning of the Chevron doctrine and how his team designed Order 1920 around reliability and existing legal precedent. The conversation then turns to the bigger challenge facing the U.S. grid: rapidly growing electricity demand from AI, data centers, electrification, and industrial activity. Phillips argues that the grid was not built for this moment and that the country needs faster, more coordinated planning while preserving the role of states and regional authorities. Finally, Phillips discusses large loads, behind-the-meter generation, vertically integrated utilities, and the possibility that hyperscalers could become major power generators. He argues that regulators, utilities, and technology companies have an opportunity to work together to build the infrastructure needed for the next era of the American economy. Episode recorded on July 29, 2026 (Published on August 25, 2026). In this episode, we cover:  (0:00) An overview of FERC and Willie Phillips's career (6:31) How companies can successfully navigate the FERC process (9:07) What overturning Chevron means for federal regulators (12:00) Order 1920 and the need for long-term transmission planning (13:35) Reforming the interconnection queue (15:39) How FERC navigated legal uncertainty around grid reform (17:29) Why America needs to “do big things” with the electric grid (20:42) FERC, states, and the future of grid planning (23:33) America's energy infrastructure race with China (25:02) Why large loads are transforming the grid (27:07) A 21st-century economy running on 20th-century rules (28:18) FERC's approach to accelerating large-load interconnections (30:15) Why reliability, affordability, sustainability, and speed matter (31:30) The jurisdictional questions around large loads (33:06) Organized markets vs. vertically integrated utilities (37:40) Reliability, affordability, and the value of invisible infrastructure (40:35) Behind-the-meter generation and co-location (43:17) Could hyperscalers become major power generators? (44:09) Turning hyperscalers into partners in building the grid (46:09) Why the energy transition needs the voice of investors and innovators Enjoyed this episode? Please leave us a review! Share feedback or suggest future topics and guests at info@mcj.vc.Connect with MCJ:Cody Simms on LinkedInVisit mcj.vcSubscribe to the MCJ Newsletter*Editing and post-production work for this episode was provided by The Podcast Consultant

For the month of August, we’re highlighting episodes from the 2025-2026 season of Energy Policy Now. We’ll be back with new content, and a new season, on September the 8th. John Helveston of George Washington University discusses why a U.S. pullback from China on EVs is risky, and why engagement could strengthen America’s auto industry. --- China has rapidly become the center of global EV innovation, producing cars that are cheaper, faster to develop, and increasingly competitive in international markets. The United States, by contrast, is pulling back, eliminating incentives and pursuing policies that distance the country from China just as the global EV transition accelerates. George Washington University’s John Helveston, whose work focuses on global EV markets and China’s manufacturing system, argues that this course risks sidelining the U.S. from the technologies and supply chains shaping the automotive future. On the podcast, he explains why a more pragmatic approach that protects national security and workers while engaging with China’s central role in the EV ecosystem may be essential for America’s long-term position in the global auto industry. John Helveston is an associate professor in the department of Engineering Management and Systems Engineering at George Washington University. Related Content Electric Vehicle Penetration and Urban Spatial Restructuring: A Case Study of Beijing with Geospatial Machine Learning https://kleinmanenergy.upenn.edu/research/publications/electric-vehicle-penetration-and-urban-spatial-restructuring-a-case-study-of-beijing-with-geospatial-machine-learning/ Battling for Batteries: Li-Ion Policy and Supply Chain Dynamics in the U.S. and China https://kleinmanenergy.upenn.edu/research/publications/battling-for-batteries-li-ion-policy-and-supply-chain-dynamics-in-the-u-s-and-china/ Energy Policy Now is produced by The Kleinman Center for Energy Policy at the University of Pennsylvania. For all things energy policy, visit kleinmanenergy.upenn.edu. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

If you have heard negative things about solar power, you might be asking yourself are solar lights eco-friendly, or not? We look at solar lights' environmental impact (from manufacturing to disposal), whether or not you can recycle solar lights, if solar lights cause pollution, and more.Buy Us a Coffee ☕ If you love our show, send your support! SourcesGreen Home Systems (company): https://greenhomesystems.com/ Home & Gardens: https://www.homesandgardens.com/gardens/are-solar-lights-eco-friendlyInternational Energy Agency (IEA) on solar PV: https://www.iea.org/reports/solar-pv-global-supply-chains/executive-summary IEA on critical minerals: https://www.iea.org/reports/the-role-of-critical-minerals-in-clean-energy-transitions/executive-summary Renewable Energy Journal: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0960148124014757 Conservation Law Foundation: https://www.clf.org/blog/the-truth-about-carbon-footprints/ Kleinman Center for Energy Policy: https://kleinmanenergy.upenn.edu/research/publications/impact-of-solar-lighting-kits-on-the-lives-of-the-poor/ Harvard study in Uganda: https://healthybuildings.hsph.harvard.edu/cleaner-air-changes-more-than-lungs-findings-from-rural-uganda/ Climate Brief's 16 misleading myths about solar power: https://interactive.carbonbrief.org/factcheck/solar/index.html Solar Magazine: https://solarmagazine.com/sustainable-solar-lighting-for-the-garden/ Forbes, Best Outdoor Solar Lights: https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbes-personal-shopper/article/the-best-outdoor-solar-lights/ Patreon: patreon.com/greeningupmyactInstagram: @greeningupmyactFacebook: Greening Up My ActEmail us with questions: greeningupmyact@gmail.comYouTube: Greening Up My Act

For the month of August, we’re highlighting episodes from the 2025-2026 season of Energy Policy Now. We’ll be back with new content, and a new season, on September the 8th. An economic sociologist discusses the growing heat dangers facing last-mile delivery drivers, and why federal protections remain stalled. --- E-commerce has transformed the way goods move through the American economy, driving unprecedented growth in parcel deliveries and intensifying competition among major carriers and the U.S. Postal Service. Yet this push for speed and volume now unfolds amid longer, more intense heat waves, exposing the nation’s roughly 1.5 million delivery drivers to climate-driven temperature extremes that pose growing risks on their routes. In this episode, economic sociologist and Kleinman Center faculty fellow Steve Viscelli discusses how rising heat intersects with the structure of the delivery industry. He describes the job conditions that can leave drivers vulnerable, from demanding routes to the use of monitoring technologies that encourage workers to stay on pace even when temperatures climb. Viscelli looks at the policy landscape that shapes these conditions, explains why federal heat protections for workers have been slow to materialize, and how this reality affects drivers’ day-to-day experience. He also points to steps some states are taking to set their own standards to address hotter and more demanding delivery seasons. Steve Viscelli is an economic and political sociologist at the University of Pennsylvania and a faculty fellow with the Kleinman Center for Energy Policy. Related Content: Energy System Planning: New Models for Accelerating Decarbonization https://kleinmanenergy.upenn.edu/research/publications/energy-system-planning-new-models-for-accelerating-decarbonization/ Who Buys Down the Risk When Federal Funding Recedes? https://kleinmanenergy.upenn.edu/commentary/blog/who-buys-down-the-risk-when-federal-funding-recedes/ Energy Policy Now is produced by The Kleinman Center for Energy Policy at the University of Pennsylvania. For all things energy policy, visit kleinmanenergy.upenn.edu.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

LIVE this Sunday at 8 PM UK time!   The Amish Inquisition welcomes back Marcus Gibson — author, journalist, and outspoken critic of the mainstream climate narrative — for a deep dive into “The Climate Change Myth.” Marcus has given talks at the Oxford Union, written for major outlets, and faced cancellation after challenging the orthodoxy on climate science and energy policy. His work explores how media bias, political agendas, and flawed data have shaped public perception — and what that means for the future of energy, industry, and free speech. Expect a conversation covering:

Solar and wind power is growing worldwide, but so is electricity consumption: as a result, renewables are often only added to the energy mix, rather than replacing fossil fuels. Reducing energy demand would make net zero more achievable, but it recieves far less attention than decarbonisation efforts. This may be due to a perception that managing energy demand would be politically unpopular, requiring governments to make radical interventions into people's lifestyles and spending. Oliver Broad, Senior Research Fellow at University College London, tells Alasdair that such fears are unfounded. His team's research found that the UK could reduce energy demand by 52% without new tech or overly disruptive societal change, and has worked with policymakers and public focus groups to demonstrate political acceptability. Further reading: 'Policymakers and academics envision energy demand reductions beyond typical policies in the United Kingdom', Nature Energy, 2025'Policymaker-led scenarios and public dialogue facilitate energy demand analysis for net-zero futures', Nature Energy, 2025'Energy demand reduction options for meeting national zero-emission targets in the United Kingdom', Nature Energy, 2022'Real people or "economic processing units"? The limited understanding of people's roles in energy and climate governance', Energy Research & Social Science, 2022'A low energy demand scenario for meeting the 1.5 °C target and sustainable development goals without negative emission technologies', Nature Energy, 2018'Invisible energy policies: A new agenda for energy demand reduction', Energy Policy, 2018Send us Fan MailFind all our latest investigations, features and interviews at www.landclimate.org

Connecticut's political debate—especially around energy policy—has become overly partisan and driven by political rhetoric rather than technical expertise. We spoke with our energy expert on the show, Bryson Hull, who has studied and worked in the energy field for 25 years, about what is at the core of the problem with our energy prices in the state. Hull is also the Deputy Northeast Director for the Consumer Energy Alliance.Image Credit: Eric Urbanowicz

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The modern agricultural system delivers an extraordinary abundance and variety of food at relatively low cost, thanks in part to abundant and affordable energy. Can those benefits be preserved without creating unacceptable exposure to disruption? --- Recent disruptions to food and energy markets have drawn renewed attention to the links between agriculture, energy, and global trade. Fertilizer production, transportation networks, and global supply chains all rely on abundant and affordable energy. Bernhard Dalheimer, an expert on agricultural market shocks and an assistant professor of macroeconomics and trade in Purdue University’s Department of Agricultural Economics, explores how energy shapes modern agriculture through transportation, fertilizer, and biofuels, and how disruptions move through agricultural systems in different ways across regions and economies. He also examines one of the central challenges facing modern agriculture: how to maintain the benefits of highly interconnected agricultural and energy systems while reducing their exposure to disruption. Dalheimer explores the role diversification can play in reducing risk while preserving the benefits that abundant energy and global trade have made possible. Related Content The Energy-Agriculture Nexus: A Multi-Year Research and Policy Agenda https://kleinmanenergy.upenn.edu/research/publications/the-energy-agriculture-nexus-a-multi-year-research-and-policy-agenda/ Climate Change and Migration in Central America: Evidence from New Environmental Event Data https://kleinmanenergy.upenn.edu/research/publications/climate-change-and-migration-in-central-america-evidence-from-new-environmental-event-data/ Energy Policy Now is produced by The Kleinman Center for Energy Policy at the University of Pennsylvania. For all things energy policy, visit kleinmanenergy.upenn.edu.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Text the show! Originally aired February 17, 2026.This week's Best Of episode begins with a confession that usually surprises people:I drive an electric Hummer.That doesn't make me less conservative.It actually reinforces one of my core beliefs.People don't reject innovation—they reject being told what they're supposed to like.In this episode, we separate technology from politics and examine how mandates, subsidies, and political messaging have transformed a consumer product into a cultural battlefield.The conversation explores: Why coercion creates resistance  How markets drive better innovation than mandates  The history of energy transitions  California's energy contradictions  Why consumer freedom produces better outcomes than political planning This isn't really an episode about electric vehicles.It's an episode about liberty.

Truth Be Told with Booker Scott – New York families face rising energy bills, housing costs, and government spending that pushes opportunity out of reach. James Corell argues for reliable nuclear power, practical homeownership incentives, fiscal discipline, and leadership that protects taxpayers while restoring affordability, stability, and hope for young residents across the state and future generations...

My fellow pro-growth/progress/abundance Up Wingers in America and around the world:What problem does a data-center moratorium solve, exactly? As these warehouse-sized supercomputers face growing public backlash, they're blamed for higher electricity bills and strains on the power grid—all while failing to provide enough jobs or tax revenue. But are they actually the problem, or are they exposing problems that have existed for years in America's electrical grid?Today on Faster, Please!—The Podcast, I am joined by Shuting Pomerleau, the director of energy and environmental policy at the American Action Forum, where she studies electricity markets and energy policy.We discuss New York's controversial decision to pause construction of large data centers, whether AI is really driving up electricity prices, the economic benefits of data centers, who should pay for expanding the grid, and how states should respond to growing demand for power.In This Episode:* New York's Data Center Slowdown (0:16)* Dealing with Demand (7:09)* What is the Right Step Forward? (14:24)* Who is Paying Up? (19:27)* Can Regulation Fend Off Data Center Growth? (23:39)* Where Do Data Centers Go from Here (27:44)A lightly edited transcript of our conversation will appear in my Week in Review issue on Saturday. (Another option is using the Substack auto transcript function.)But here are some edited highlights from the chat:On New York's data center moratorium…My concern is that pausing this will send a very strong signal to investors, data centers and developers, a very chilling signal saying, “you're not really welcome here.” This is such a fast-moving space. One year is actually a lot of time.On what's really driving electricity price increases…What has been really driving the electricity increases mostly in the residential sector is the local distribution system—the maintenance, repairs, upgrades that cost a lot of money. It was almost like a coincidence with the AI data center boom and the sentiment against AI. We see that in electricity prices, but if you look into the real price level changes, it's still quite flat both at the state level and across the country.On the policy challenge of funding AI infrastructure…What is a fair share? That is a question that has always been on my mind. The data centers are not all sitting there across the country doing their own thing separate from the remaining population. They're providing digital services and great services for us, you and me, using AI. So, what is a fair share? How can they pay exactly how much they use?On the economic benefits of data centers…The opposition to AI data centers is probably one of the biggest pieces of misinformation out there. The right way to look at it is these are businesses that are paying taxes; they're paying property taxes. If you look at Loudoun County, about 90% of the county's operating budget comes from data centers.On whether regulation can slow the AI data center boom…I think of the AI data center boom in the United States as a fast-moving train. It's going to move; it's going to happen. I think the New York States moratorium, some of the local opposition across the countries may slow down some of the application of development, but not very significantly. I think what will have a material impact on the pace of AI data center development is all the discussion about who's paying for it.On what needs to happen with data centers…First, permitting reform. It will alleviate the burden off of a lot of people's minds, and a lot of stakeholders' minds. Two is, we really need some reform in our grid, in terms of interconnection. I would say interconnection is your keyword, both on the generation side, connecting to generation sources and to large load customers.On sale everywhere: The Conservative Futurist: How To Create the Sci-Fi World We Were Promised This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit fasterplease.substack.com/subscribe

State Rep. Joe D'Orsie gets Straight to the Point with Rep. Josh Kail. Discussion centers on Energy Policy and development in PA.

State Rep. Joe D'Orsie gets Straight to the Point with Rep. Josh Kail. Discussion centers on Energy Policy and development in PA.

It's been a heat-wave summer this year, with triple-digit temperatures striking the U.S. and Europe. Americans used more electricity than ever to keep cool, but the U.S. power grid met the challenge, supported by clean energy. New York becomes the first state to ban AI data centers. Could Massachusetts be next? And is your free-range cat chomping on more than birds and mice? It's our environmental news roundtable!

The Green Party is promising a major shake up of New Zealand's electricity market, unveiling a policy it says will cut household power bills, boost renewable energy and improve energy security. Green Party co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick spoke to John Campbell.

As New York Times climate reporter Lisa Friedman moves to the UK to become the newspaper's London-based energy correspondent with responsibility for covering Europe and the Middle East., she speaks with host Robert Stavins to discuss the challenges of covering energy and climate policy during Trump 2.0 and the issues she expects to cover while based overseas.

Today the Green Party announced their new energy policy to build a publicly owned electricity company called Kiwipower. The policy has a proposed $980 million four-year appropriation with the goal of cutting power bills and expanding renewable energy. "It's creating something called firming, which effectively is the power that kind of rumbles on in the background and is constant," Greens co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick told Heather du Plessis-Allan. "These are the kinds of investments that are necessary for the sake of creating that secure and resilient energy system." LISTEN ABOVE See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Tonight on The Huddle, Childfund CEO Josie Pagani and Sherson Willis co-founder Trish Sherson joined in on a discussion about the following issues of the day - and more! The big topic of debate is the latest election policy announcements out of NZ First and Greens both focusing on drastically different approaches to energy. LISTEN ABOVESee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Geopower, Energy Realpolitik with Todd Royal – Energy should be judged the same way. Not by press releases. Not by theoretical capacity. Not by the number of panels installed, turbines erected, or dollars appropriated. The question is much simpler: Did the system deliver abundant, reliable, and affordable energy while reducing fossil-fuel consumption?

In this episode, energy policy expert Erik Olson joins Madelyn O'Farrell to unpack how surging electricity demand from AI and data centers is colliding with an aging, slow-moving U.S. grid and regulatory system. They discuss why today's load growth is comparable to the 1970s air conditioning boom, the challenges utilities face in integrating massive, fast-moving data center projects, and the financial risks of overbuilding grid infrastructure that may never be fully used. Erik explains how geography, water constraints, transmission limits, and state-by-state rules shape where data centers can actually go, and highlights creative solutions like data centers directly funding clean energy projects or paying to improve residential energy efficiency to offset their load. He closes with lessons from his time at the Department of Energy, arguing that policymakers need to prioritize simplicity, speed, and clear implementation over “perfect” policy design if they want to keep up with the pace of real-world energy infrastructure development. Highlights from their conversation include: Erik's Background in Energy Policy (0:28) Explaining the Generational Surge in Electricity Demand (1:34) Collision Between Fast Tech Companies and Slow Grid Institutions (1:50) How Massive Data Centers Strain Traditional Utility Planning (3:54) Risks of Overbuilding, Stranded Assets, and Who Pays (7:37) Geographic Hotspots, Constraints, and State-by-State Differences (8:27) Creative Workarounds Like Curtailment, Direct Funding, and Efficiency (11:18) Lessons From DOE on Policy, Implementation, and Speed in Government (15:12) Final Thoughts on Moving at the Speed of Business (20:51) Dynamo Ventures is a venture firm backing founders upgrading the physical economy. As intelligence moves into critical infrastructure and technology collides with physics, industry is entering a new era of transformation - the industrial renaissance. Born from the dirt and grit of supply chains and shaped by operations, not spreadsheets, Dynamo focuses on the complex realities of building in the real world. We invest in companies transforming infrastructure, manufacturing, logistics, transportation, and the systems that power global commerce. Dynamo works closely with founders who combine ambition with a bias to action, bringing a builder mindset to venture capital through deep operational insight, systematic pressure-testing and hands-on partnership. Our purpose is simple: to back the relentless shaping the industrial renaissance. Learn more at www.dynamo.vc. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Can the energy choices we make today influence affordability for decades to come? --- Affordability has become one of the defining issues in American politics. Rising costs for housing, healthcare, groceries, and energy continue to strain household budgets. But economist Heather Boushey argues that affordability runs much deeper than prices alone. It reflects how the economy is structured, the kinds of jobs and opportunities the economy creates, and how the benefits of economic growth are shared. Boushey, a professor of practice with the Kleinman Center for Energy Policy and head of the EconClimate Lab, discusses the relationship between affordability, energy, and economic opportunity. Drawing on decades of work at the intersection of economics and public policy, as well as her experience as chief economist for the White House Investing in America Cabinet during the Biden administration, she explains why energy plays a central role in economic growth and competitiveness, why she believes that “what we make here matters,” and how investments in domestic industries can shape long-term economic opportunity. Boushey also reflects on what the Inflation Reduction Act set in motion, what may endure from the law, and what its implementation reveals about the challenge of sustaining long-term economic strategies in a short-term political environment. Related Content Coping Under Strain: How Climate, Utility Disconnections, and LIHEAP Shaped Household Energy Strategies During the Pandemic https://kleinmanenergy.upenn.edu/research/publications/coping-under-strain-how-climate-utility-disconnections-and-liheap-shaped-household-energy-strategies-during-the-pandemic/ Breaking the Lock on Urban Climate Finance: A Proposal for a Green Cities Guarantee Fund to Support Climate Resilient Infrastructure in Cities https://kleinmanenergy.upenn.edu/research/publications/breaking-the-lock-on-urban-climate-finance-a-proposal-for-a-green-cities-guarantee-fund-to-support-climate-resilient-infrastructure-in-cities/ Energy Policy Now is produced by The Kleinman Center for Energy Policy at the University of Pennsylvania. For all things energy policy, visit kleinmanenergy.upenn.edu.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Can Texas' electric grid keep up with the explosive growth of AI, data centers, and a rapidly expanding population? On this episode of Texas Talks, host Brad Swail sits down with Mark Bell, President and CEO of the Association of Electric Companies of Texas (AECT), to discuss the future of the Texas electric grid, the unprecedented demand for electricity, and how the state is preparing for the next generation of economic growth. Bell explains why Texas has become one of the nation's leading destinations for new industry, how AI-driven data centers are changing long-term electricity planning, and what lawmakers, regulators, and utilities are doing to ensure the grid remains reliable and affordable. The conversation covers: Texas' rapid electricity demand and population growth AI data centers and their impact on the electric grid ERCOT's long-term planning and transmission expansion Senate Bill 6 and new rules for large energy users Who pays for new grid infrastructure? Nuclear energy, batteries, renewables, and natural gas Why Texas remains one of the nation's most affordable electricity markets The discussion also explores how competitive electricity markets work, why new transmission lines are needed regardless of data center growth, and how Texas utilities are preparing to meet future demand while protecting residential ratepayers. 00:00 — Texas' exploding electricity demand 00:22 — Intro & Meet Mark Bell 03:22 — Why the grid conversation has changed 06:04 — AI data centers and future demand 11:16 — ERCOT's interconnection queue explained 16:15 — Building the next generation of power 20:11 — Who pays for grid expansion? 28:22 — Senate Bill 6 and new grid rules 30:55 — Local concerns about data centers 34:03 — What comes next for the Texas grid? 38:03 — Closing thoughts Watch Full-Length Interviews: https://www.youtube.com/@TexasTalks Follow us on social mediaX: @Texas_DispatchInstagram: thetexasdispatchLinkedIn: The Texas DispatchTikTok: texas_talks_podcast Find more at The Texas DispatchYour source for state news, policy, and investigative journalism.https://thetexasdispatch.com

Europe is developing green energy at lighting speed.  But as solar and wind generation reaches record levels, new challenges are emerging across the electricity system. Negative prices, grid congestion, curtailment and falling capture prices are raising a fundamental question: has renewable deployment reached its limits, or is the rest of the energy system failing to keep pace?In this episode of the Plugged In Summer Series, we explore whether Europe's next challenge is no longer building renewable generation, but integrating it.Host Snjólfur Richard Sverrisson, Editor-in-Chief of Montel News, is joined by Dr Lion Hirth, one of Europe's leading energy market economists and Professor of Energy Policy at the Hertie School; Luca Pedretti, Chief Product Officer & Co-Founder of Pexapark; and Professor Jan Rosenow, one of Europe's foremost experts on energy efficiency and electrification, and Professor of Energy and Climate Policy at the University of Oxford.Together they examine whether current market structures, grids and policy frameworks are fit for a predominantly green energy system,, how investors are responding to growing merchant risk, and why flexibility, storage and electrification could determine whether Europe's energy transition continues to accelerate…or begins to slow down.Host:Snjólfur Richard Sverrisson, Editor-in-Chief, Montel NewsGuests:Dr Lion Hirth, Professor of Energy Policy, Hertie SchoolLuca Pedretti, Chief Product Officer & Co-Founder, PexaparkJan Rosenow, Energy Programme Leader and Professor of Energy and Climate Policy, University of OxfordProducer: Alexandra Carlon Editor: Alexandra Carlon

As UK summers get hotter and heatwaves become more frequent, more people are considering air conditioning as a way to keep cool. But how does air conditioning actually work, and in our efforts to cool down are we harming the planet? Chris Warburton speaks to Rob Gross, director of the UK Energy Research Centre (UKERC) and Professor of Energy Policy and Technology at Imperial College London.

During the second segment of Hour 1 on her Thursday show, Tara takes aim at New York City's aggressive push toward green energy policies, specifically criticizing a mandated 78-degree thermostat setting for local businesses. She rails against what she sees as a cautionary tale of government overreach, pointing out that New York has drastically weakened its own power grid by shutting down major baseload energy providers—such as the Indian Point nuclear plant and multiple coal facilities—without having reliable replacement energy ready to go. Tara highlights the hypocrisy of city leaders demanding citizens restrict their AC usage to alleviate stress on a grid they dismantled themselves, tying the entire situation back to what she calls an extreme "global warming" agenda that leaves residents suffering in the heat.

Joining Elias on this morning's show were: Dan Delmar, Co-founder of the content marketing firm TNKR Media and co-host of the podcast Inspiring Entrepreneurs Canada, and Tasha Kheiriddin, a writer and commentator for the National Post, GZero Media, and Substack. Among the topics discussed were: A new Leger poll out this week says that 84 percent of Canadians are proud to be Canadian. Prime Minister Mark Carney says the Liberal climate plan he inherited was "too expensive" for Canadians and "too divisive" to be sustainable, arguing today's world demands a different approach. U.S. authorities say they have seen a significant increase in illegal crossings of the U.S. border from Quebec to Vermont in recent weeks. When you ask AI chatbots for answers, should they be politically biased? The 60 people came from 20 different countries, including Angola, Chile, China, Colombia, Greece, India, Ireland, Romania, Senegal, Spain, Turkey and the United Kingdom.

Australians want action on climate change – just not too fast. That's the take from Climate Change and Energy Minister Chris Bowen, who's spoken exclusively to The Australian ahead of a huge global climate summit where he's promising Australia will reject any radical policy changes. Read more about this story at theaustralian.com.au and see the video by subscribing to our YouTube channel. Expect no ‘massive breakthrough’ at COP, Chris Bowen warns COP it on the chin: Chris Bowen ‘must focus on fuel crisis’ Chris Bowen to serve as COP31 president after Australia cedes hosting rights to Turkey This episode of The Front is presented and produced by Kristen Amiet and edited by Jasper Leak. Our regular host is Claire Harvey and our team includes Lia Tsamoglou, Tiffany Dimmack, and Joshua Burton.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

One of the most important issues for Connecticut residents and businesses is the rising cost of energy, a major factor driving the state's affordability crisis. On this episode of the CBIA BizCast, CBIA Foundation director Dustin Nord sits down with host Amanda Marlow to talk about a new report about the relationship between natural gas and electricity prices. Produced by the Connecticut Center for Economic Analysis on behalf of the Connecticut League of Conservation Voters, the report claims the state has become more polluted and has more expensive electricity because of the adoption of natural gas over the past 25 years. Nord shares his concerns about the report and offers an analysis of Connecticut's energy infrastructure. Episode Highlights: Drivers of high energy costs Natural gas in Connecticut Long-term cost, infrastructure, and environmental picture Need for an “all of the above” approach https://www.cbia.com/news/issues-policies/natural-gas-does-not-make-electricity-more-expensive Headlines You May Have Missed What's Happening to Connecticut's Labor Force? (https://www.cbia.com/news/economy/connecticut-labor-force-shrinking) Healthcare Tax Proposal ‘Unfairly Targets Employers' (https://www.cbia.com/news/issues-policies/healthcare-tax-proposal-unfairly-targets-employers) New Business-Related Laws Take Effect July 1 (https://www.cbia.com/news/issues-policies/new-business-related-laws-july-1)

This was a fun discussion around Energy Security and the importance to consumers. Neil Chatterjee, Chief of Governmental Affairs, Palmetto, stopped by, and we had a wild discussion. Neil was also the Chairman and Commissioner of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.1. Palmetto's Consumer-Focused Clean Energy PlatformNeil Chatterjee discusses his role as Chief of Government Affairs at Palmetto, a company that democratizes access to clean energy technologies like solar, heat pumps, storage, HVAC systems, and smart meters. The key innovation is their leasing model, which makes these technologies affordable for average Americans by removing the need for large upfront capital investments. Palmetto also provides financing and uses AI to optimize energy efficiency.2. Energy Security and IndependenceThe conversation emphasizes how consumers can achieve personal energy independence through behind-the-meter solutions. This addresses rising electricity bills (increasing 230% in some areas due to data centers) and provides protection against grid strain during peak demand periods. The concept of "energy security starts at home" is central to this discussion.3. Data Centers and AI InfrastructureA significant portion focuses on the rapid expansion of data centers in regions like Northern Virginia ("Data Center Alley"). While acknowledging benefits (tax revenue, improved community infrastructure), the hosts discuss the challenges: increased power demand, potential grid strain, and the need for strategic siting in cooler regions with adequate water access. They debate the importance of winning the AI race against China for national security.4. AI's Positive and Negative ImplicationsNeil advocates for focusing on AI's real-world benefits—curing cancer, improving energy efficiency, optimizing grid management—rather than the controversial narrative about job displacement. He warns that blocking AI through data center moratoriums would only increase costs and exacerbate inequality, as only wealthy entities could afford premium AI services.5. Energy Policy and the "All of the Above" ApproachThe hosts discuss the need for a balanced energy strategy combining fossil fuels (natural gas, coal, oil), renewables (solar, wind), nuclear, and emerging technologies like storage and demand response. They emphasize that the U.S. cannot transition to clean energy without fossil fuels in the near term, particularly in regions like Kentucky and Southwest Virginia.6. Geopolitical Energy DynamicsThe Strait of Hormuz blockade is highlighted as a wake-up call about global energy vulnerability. The discussion covers how U.S. LNG exports provide geopolitical advantage to allies and reduce dependence on Middle Eastern oil and Russian gas. However, they caution against trading that dependence for reliance on Chinese critical minerals and components.7. Political Polarization in Energy PolicyNeil critiques how energy policy has become unnecessarily polarized—fossil fuels associated with the political right, clean energy with the left. He proposes a vision where "red supply feeds blue demand": clean energy manufacturing in red states supplies power to population centers in blue states, potentially breaking the political gridlock.8. Grid Modernization and TransmissionThe discussion includes the need for easier permitting to build transmission lines, natural gas pipelines, and grid-enhancing technologies. A Texas grid operator's proposal to approve data center applications in batches (rather than individually) is highlighted as an innovative approach to managing complex infrastructure challenges.This episode presents a nuanced view of America's energy future, balancing economic growth, technological innovation, energy security, and environmental concerns.Get more information on Palmetto here: https://palmetto.com/Connect with Neil on his LinkedIn here: https://www.linkedin.com/in/neil-chatterjee-121127212/Check out the Energy News Beat SubStack https://theenergynewsbeat.substack.com/A shout-out to Steve Reese and the Reese Energy Consulting group for sponsoring the Podcast https://reeseenergyconsulting.com/.Data2 if you have any business systems, can you trust A? Well, they have the patent on validation. . https://data2.zoholandingpage.com/energyAnd we have WellDatabase rolling in as a new sponsor. https://welldatabase.com/

Critical Minerals, Energy and A.I. – Liv Carroll, Critical Minerals Expert, former Managing Director - EMEA Mining Lead and Global Natural Resources Lead for Data & A.I. at Accenture   "The energy transition is certainly where critical minerals started, but now we're obviously supporting all of the digital technology and the AI infrastructure such as data centers and others…now, there are conversations addressing the minerals required to feed this ginormous population of over 8 billion that we have because that is actually not possible without mining certain minerals that then go into the fertilizers to ensure that we have sufficient yields to feed the population of the planet…There's another factor as well as them being at risk of a supply shock." Liv Carroll on Electric Ladies Podcast   There are uses of critical minerals that we may not think about, such as how they are critical to our food supply. Now we have a huge need for them with the rapid expansion of data centers and A.I. as well as the rest of our electronics, appliances, computers, automobiles, weaponry and aircraft. But they are also at the mercy of geopolitical and economic forces, and the climate. What do we need to know? Listen to Liv Carroll, a top critical minerals expert for over 20 years who recently served as Managing Director - EMEA Mining Lead and Global Natural Resources Lead for Data & A.I. at Accenture in this illuminating conversation with Electric Ladies Podcast host Joan Michelson. Liv has also served on the board of Women in Mining and on the board of the Global Mining Guidelines group for many years. You'll hear about: ●        How critical minerals are vital to our food supply for this massive population. ●        Where and how critical mineral supplies are at the mercy of geopolitical and economic forces, as well as climate change. ●        The role of critical minerals in "responsible A.I."….and so much more. ●        Plus, career advice, such as:   "I think it's really important to gather along the way a number of people that you feel it's not just that they wave a flag for you and they're a cheerleader, but you feel that they seriously, they see you, you don't have to explain yourself for what you meant by something that you said to them…the people who really get you, you don't have to elaborate.… And they are often not in the company you are working in at the moment.  They could in fact be a boss from a previous company….The other piece of advice I would say is continue adding strings to your bow. And they might not be the strings that you think you would want or need, but as you get into later stages in your career, they're the strings that will stand you apart." Liv Carroll on Electric Ladies Podcast   Subscribe to our newsletter to receive our podcasts, blog, events and special coaching offers.   You'll also like: ·       Critical Minerals 101: Abby Wulf, Critical Minerals Expert, Former Head of Critical Minerals at the Dept. Of Energy, & Center for Critical Minerals Strategy ·       The State of Energy Today Might Surprise You - with Lisa Jacobson, President of the Business Council for Sustainable Energy on their 2026 Energy Factbook ·       Managing IT in the Midst of a Tech Revolution - with Elizabeth Hackenson, Chief Information Officer, Schneider Electric ·       What We Can Learn From Canada's Energy Policies – with Claire Seaborn, energy attorney and former Chief of Staff to the Canadian Minister of Energy and Natural Resources ·       Reducing The IT Sector's Carbon Footprint – with Monica Batchelder, Chief Sustainability Officer of HPE (Hewlett Packard Enterprises) ·       Making Computers Sustainably – with Page Motes, Chief Sustainability Officer at Dell Technologies Subscribe to our newsletter to receive our podcasts, blog, events and special coaching offers. Thanks for subscribing on Apple Podcasts or iHeartRadio and leaving us a review! Follow us on Twitter @joanmichelson

Southwest Power Pool’s expansion into the West marks a major step toward greater regional coordination of the electric grid. --- Earlier this year the Southwest Power Pool, the electric grid operator for much of the central United States, expanded into the Western Interconnection, becoming the first Regional Transmission Organization to operate in both the Eastern and Western grids. The move comes as Western utilities seek to address rising electricity demand, the integration of growing amounts of clean energy, and concerns about future grid reliability, challenges that broader regional coordination may help address. SPP plans to build on that expansion with Markets+, a new regional market initiative scheduled to launch in 2027. Together, these efforts represent one of the most significant pushes yet toward greater electricity market coordination in the American West. They also come as California’s grid operator pursues its own effort to expand regional market participation through its Extended Day-Ahead Market, or EDAM, giving Western utilities multiple paths toward closer regional integration, each with different approaches to governance and market oversight. On the podcast, SPP Chief Executive Officer Lanny Nickell discusses SPP’s expansion into the West and the development of Markets+. He explains why Western utilities are becoming more interested in regional coordination, the tradeoffs between independence and larger markets, and what these developments may mean for the future of the electric grid in the American West. Lanny Nickell is the Chief Executive Officer of Southwest Power Pool. Related Content Mobile Energy Storage: Flexibility for the Energy Transition https://kleinmanenergy.upenn.edu/research/publications/mobile-energy-storage-flexibility-for-the-energy-transition/ Congestion in General Equilibrium: Nodal Electricity Pricing, Production, and Welfare https://kleinmanenergy.upenn.edu/research/publications/congestion-in-general-equilibrium-nodal-electricity-pricing-production-and-welfare/ Energy Policy Now is produced by The Kleinman Center for Energy Policy at the University of Pennsylvania. For all things energy policy, visit kleinmanenergy.upenn.edu.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Tom interviews Anika Sweetland, who argues Earth's climate changes in predictable natural cycles and that today is relatively cool in a 65‑million‑year context. Using graphs and books by Gregory Wrightstone, she describes ice-age rhythms linked to Milankovitch cycles and 1,500‑year Dansgaard–Oeschger cycles, including the Medieval Warm Period and Little Ice Age, and claims solar activity and cosmic rays better correlate with temperature than CO2. She says the IPCC smooths data and governments use fear for control, while net-zero policies are wasteful and geoengineering in the UK is concerning. Sweetland recounts university climate studies as CO2-focused indoctrination, discusses backlash and support online, and previews a part two on the IPCC.00:00 Meet Anika Sweetland04:40 Ice Ages and Long Cooling07:18 Milankovitch Cycles Explained09:14 Dansgaard Oeschger Cycles11:04 Medieval Warmth and Little Ice Age14:01 Sun Cosmic Rays and Clouds18:21 CO2 Claims and Propaganda21:07 Her Climate Degree Experience23:22 Education Debate and Models27:47 Conference Disruption and Activism30:34 Social Media Pushback34:54 Part Two and Wrap Up35:22 Energy Policy and Geoengineering39:18 Final Thanks and Goodbyehttps://x.com/anika_climateThe 16th International Conference on Climate Change: https://climateconference.heartland.org/Anika on being bombarded with global warming propaganda: https://x.com/anika_climate/status/2037550091544785239=========Slides, summaries, references, and transcripts of my podcasts: https://tomn.substack.com/p/podcast-summariesMy Linktree: https://linktr.ee/tomanelson1

In this episode, we're joined by Doug Burghum, the Secretary of the Interior and former Governor of North Dakota. From his humble beginnings as a young man from a small town in North Dakota to building a successful software company that was acquired by Microsoft, Doug's journey is a testament to the power of risk-taking and innovation. As Secretary of the Interior, Doug is responsible for managing the nation's public lands, natural resources, and cultural heritage. He shares his insights on the importance of balancing recreational activities like rock climbing with the need to protect wildlife habitats. He also discusses the new climbing rules announced by the Department of Interior, which aim to strike a balance between these competing interests. Doug's conversation with Ross also delves into his experiences as a successful entrepreneur and his transition to public service. He talks about the importance of taking calculated risks and making tough decisions, citing his own story of mortgaging his family's farm to start his software company. He also highlights the need for a more balanced approach to energy production, citing the example of Colorado, which is missing out on revenue and economic opportunities due to its anti-energy policies. In this episode, you'll hear Doug's unique perspective on the intersection of energy policy, economic development, and public lands management. He shares his insights on how states like Colorado can benefit from a more balanced approach to energy production and how this can drive economic growth and innovation. Join us as we explore these important topics and more with Secretary Doug Burghum.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this episode of American Potential, host David From sits down with U.S. Senator Alan Armstrong to discuss one of the biggest barriers to American growth: the broken permitting process. Drawing on decades of experience in the energy industry, Senator Armstrong explains how excessive regulation, legal challenges, and bureaucratic overlap have made it nearly impossible to build critical infrastructure—even when projects are already completed. From billion-dollar pipelines being shut down to states blocking interstate energy projects, he highlights the real-world consequences for energy costs, reliability, and national security. The conversation also explores key legislation like the SPEED Act and the PERMIT Act, and why meaningful reform requires more than surface-level fixes. Armstrong shares his perspective on what policymakers often get wrong—and why now is a critical moment to get it right. This episode offers a behind-the-scenes look at how policy decisions shape America's ability to build, compete, and thrive—and why fixing permitting is essential to the country's future.

A federal appeals court rejected a suit filed by 22 young Montanans that challenges several executive orders signed by President Trump in early 2025.

For years, electricity prices broadly tracked inflation. New pressures may be changing that. --- Electricity prices have become a major political issue in the United States, with policymakers increasingly focused on rising utility bills and the costs of meeting growing electricity demand. At the same time, renewable energy has often been blamed for driving prices higher. But what does the data actually show? Ryan Hledik of The Brattle Group discusses research conducted with Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory on U.S. electricity price trends. The research finds that, nationally, electricity prices have largely tracked inflation, though significant regional differences tell a more complicated story. Hledik explains the factors that really drive electricity prices, the role of renewable energy, natural gas, and infrastructure investment, and why electricity costs vary so dramatically across the country. Hledik also explores whether 2025, when electricity prices rose faster than inflation nationally, marks the beginning of a new era of rising electricity prices, or a temporary departure from a longer-term trend. Ryan Hledik is an alumni policy advisor with the Kleinman Center for Energy Policy and a principal with The Brattle Group. Related Content: Congestion in General Equilibrium: Nodal Electricity Pricing, Production, and Welfare https://kleinmanenergy.upenn.edu/research/publications/congestion-in-general-equilibrium-nodal-electricity-pricing-production-and-welfare/ Boomtowns in the Battery Belt: Risks and Opportunities of Clean Energy Investments in Small Towns of America https://kleinmanenergy.upenn.edu/research/publications/boomtowns-in-the-battery-belt-risks-and-opportunities-of-clean-energy-investments-in-small-towns-of-america/ How PJM Is Grappling With Data Center Power Demand https://kleinmanenergy.upenn.edu/commentary/podcast/how-pjm-is-grappling-with-data-center-power-demand/ Energy Policy Now is produced by The Kleinman Center for Energy Policy at the University of Pennsylvania. For all things energy policy, visit kleinmanenergy.upenn.edu.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

This Day in Legal History: The Burning of the GaspeeOn this day in 1772, a Royal Navy revenue schooner called HMS Gaspee, captained by a notably overzealous Lieutenant William Duddington, ran aground in shallow water in Narragansett Bay while chasing a Rhode Island packet boat called the Hannah. Within hours of the grounding, roughly sixty Providence merchants, sailors, and “Sons of Liberty” — led by John Brown, one of the wealthiest men in the colony — rowed out under cover of darkness in eight longboats, boarded the Gaspee, shot Duddington, and burned the ship to the waterline. The legal significance lies in what came next. The Crown convened a Royal Commission of Inquiry with authority to ship the perpetrators across the Atlantic for trial in England, bypassing colonial juries entirely, a procedural maneuver that the colonies read as a direct attack on the right to jury trial in the vicinage.The Virginia House of Burgesses responded in March 1773 by forming the first Committee of Correspondence, a sustained intercolonial communication network that became, two years later, the institutional skeleton of the Continental Congress. The Gaspee Affair never produced a single prosecution — the commission could not get the colonial governor or the Rhode Island courts to cooperate, and witness testimony evaporated — but it produced something more durable: the colonial conviction that the Crown's willingness to detour around local juries was itself a constitutional grievance worth organizing against. The right-to-jury-in-the-vicinage point that Madison wrote into the Sixth Amendment seventeen years later is, in a real sense, the Gaspee Affair's longest-lived legacy.The Supreme Court on Monday granted, vacated, and remanded the D.C. Circuit's decision in American Gas Association v. Department of Energy, sending the long-disputed Biden-era Department of Energy efficiency rule on non-condensing residential gas furnaces and commercial water heaters back to the D.C. Circuit “for further consideration in light of the position asserted by the Solicitor General.” That last phrase is the operative one. The new Solicitor General, on behalf of the second Trump administration's DOE, told the Court in late April that the prior administration's reading of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act was, in DOE's current view, wrong, and that the rule effectively bans non-condensing units that millions of homes and small commercial properties were built around. A confessed-error from a new administration doesn't automatically win a case, but the procedural vehicle — a grant-vacate-remand, or “GVR” — is the Court's standard way of saying “go look at this again with the new posture in mind” without resolving the merits itself.The trade-group plaintiffs, led by the American Gas Association and the American Public Gas Association, framed the rule from the start as a de facto product ban dressed up as efficiency standards. The environmental and consumer groups that intervened to defend the rule will get another bite at the apple on remand, but their position is harder when their own client agency has switched sides. Watch the D.C. Circuit's case calendar over the next few weeks for an expedited briefing schedule.Supreme Court Vacates Decision Outlawing Gas Stoves, Water Heaters | NewsBustersSCOTUSblog on Monday published a careful overview of an increasingly organized litigation campaign to ask the Supreme Court to overrule Obergefell v. Hodges, the 2015 decision recognizing a constitutional right to same-sex marriage. The campaign now includes Liberty Counsel, MassResistance, and the Southern Baptist Convention, which last year voted overwhelmingly to urge the Court to reverse the decision. The underlying ground for the push is partly the Court's reasoning in Dobbs four years ago, which gave conservative litigants a road map for unwinding substantive due process precedents, and partly the gradual erosion of public-opinion support for same-sex marriage in one slice of the polling, with Republican support falling from 55 percent in 2022 to 37 percent now. The legal headcount at the Court is, however, the part of the story that is not yet there.Only Justice Thomas has been a consistent vote to revisit Obergefell, having said so in his Dobbs concurrence. Justice Alito, despite being one of Obergefell's original dissenters, recently emphasized in a public speech that he is not suggesting the case should be overruled, citing stare decisis. Justice Gorsuch's dissent in 303 Creative seems to concede that Obergefell is good law and tries instead to carve out specific exceptions to it. None of which is a reason for litigants on the marriage-equality side to relax. The path Dobbs opened up is wider than any single justice's current voting pattern, and the campaign is plainly playing a long game.The next round of test cases on standing and ripeness will start to surface in the lower courts in the next term or two — that is when the campaign's seriousness becomes measurable.The campaign to overrule Obergefell | SCOTUSblogThe third and most constitutionally significant story of the day is one we've been watching: the litigation over President Trump's $400 million ballroom — built on the site of the demolished East Wing — is on track to land in front of the Supreme Court, SCOTUSblog reported Monday. The D.C. Circuit panel that heard the case for more than two hours in late April has not yet ruled, but the questioning made clear that a more substantial opinion is coming and that an appeal to the Court is the likely next stop regardless of which side wins. The legal question is unusually fundamental. The plaintiff, the National Trust for Historic Preservation, argues that the President has no “free-floating” power to construct major federal buildings without an appropriation from Congress, and that the Antideficiency Act and the Public Buildings Act both require the kind of statutory authorization the East Wing ballroom never received.The administration's response, delivered in a tone that several court-watchers described as unusually defiant, has essentially been that construction has “gone too far to be stopped” and that the courts have no role in second-guessing a presidential building decision once the steel is up. The structural separation-of-powers questions here — what does the Appropriations Clause actually constrain, and can a federal court enjoin a President from continuing to build something that is partially constructed — are large enough that the Supreme Court will almost certainly want to take the case if it reaches the high court. Construction, meanwhile, continues. The most likely Supreme Court resolution is a narrow opinion on standing or remedies, with the broader Appropriations Clause questions deferred for another day. We will see.White House ballroom battle may soon arrive at the Supreme Court | SCOTUSblogIn my Bloomberg Tax column this week, I argue that the SALT deduction cap's biggest problem is not that it is unconstitutional, but that it is badly designed. The latest failed challenge, Sims v. United States, involved two New Jersey taxpayers who claimed the cap violated the 10th Amendment, the 16th Amendment, and broader federalism principles. The federal district court rejected those arguments, finding that Congress has broad authority to tax income and decide which deductions are allowed, limited, or denied. My point is that opponents of the SALT cap should stop looking for constitutional defects that courts are unlikely to find and instead focus on forcing Congress to fix the policy it created.I explain that the cap has always been politically loaded: supporters see it as a needed limit on a deduction that benefits many high-income taxpayers in high-tax states, while critics see it as a targeted attack on those states. But unfair or politically motivated tax policy is not automatically unconstitutional. The real weakness, I argue, is the cap's uneven design, especially the pass-through entity tax workaround. Many business owners can effectively get around the cap when state taxes are paid at the entity level, while wage earners, sole proprietors, and many individual taxpayers remain stuck behind it.That creates a serious mismatch: two taxpayers can live in the same state, earn similar income, and face similar state tax burdens, but receive different federal treatment depending on whether one has the right business structure. I argue that this kind of selective relief may be a more promising target for a narrower administrative or legal challenge than another broad constitutional attack on Congress's taxing power. Congress partly recognized the problem when it raised the cap from $10,000 to $40,000, but I note that the fix is temporary, only lightly indexed, and still leaves major structural problems in place. The marriage penalty remains especially glaring because married couples filing jointly do not receive double the cap available to similarly situated unmarried taxpayers.I also criticize the phaseout design because it can create cliffs or marginal-rate spikes that reward tax gamesmanship rather than sound policy. A better fix, in my view, would make the higher cap permanent, index it meaningfully, eliminate the marriage penalty, smooth out the phaseout, and require Treasury to rationalize the treatment of pass-through entity taxes. The lesson from Sims is that courts may uphold the SALT cap, but that does not make it good tax policy. If the cap is unfair, incoherent, or selectively porous, Congress owns that problem.SALT Deduction Cap Falls Short in Design, Not Constitutionality This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

In this episode of the Energy Vista Podcast, Leslie Palti-Guzman sits down with energy scholar and foreign policy expert Brenda Shaffer to discuss the energy policy implications of the Iran crisis and disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz.Brenda argues that policymakers continue to draw the wrong lessons from energy crises. The conversation explores whether some climate policies have weakened energy security. Leslie and Brenda exchange on the role of natural gas in modern economies, Europe's energy challenges, Africa's missed energy investment opportunities, China's growing influence over clean-energy supply chains, and the future of electrification.Listen & Subscribe

White House Deputy Press Secretary Kush Desai joins Marc Cox to discuss President Trump's work ethic, media accessibility, energy policy, and ongoing negotiations with Iran. Desai also addresses criticism of the president, the administration's support for domestic energy production, and efforts to support American farmers while maintaining stability in global energy markets.

"While the word 'climate' may be politically charged for some, the need for affordable, reliable, and secure energy is something we can all agree on. Americans are calling for action, and as Members of Congress it's our responsibility to deliver. If we want long-term solutions that address both our constituents' concerns and growing climate risks, we must work together to strengthen our energy and climate security with urgency." Congresswoman Chrissy Houlahan to Electric Ladies Podcast  As we in the U.S. commemorate Memorial Day this week and express gratitude for the sacrifice of thousands of servicemembers on behalf of our country, we are re-airing a landmark interview from last year with an Air Force veteran and Congresswoman who is working tirelessly and on a bipartisan basis to protect the climate and our energy systems. Listen to Congresswoman Chrissy Houlahan of Pennsylvania, who is co-chair of the Bipartisan Climate Solutions Caucus, a rare example of cooperation on Capitol Hill. She's also co-chair of the bipartisan Women in STEM Caucus and shares insights into how to build bipartisanship, protect our infrastructure from extreme climate events and provide clean, affordable energy.   You'll hear about: ·        How Pennsylvania's political landscape shapes the path of climate legislation ·        What the Bipartisan Climate Solutions Caucus is doing to advance the clean energy transition ·        How extreme weather events can open the door to bipartisan climate action ·        Why Congresswoman Houlahan's leadership with the Women in STEM Caucus matters ·        Plus, insightful career advice   "Recognize that whatever you choose to do right now is not the end decision for the rest of your life. When you look backwards it's going to make sense, but when you look forward, it's going to be a crooked line. It's not going to be a straight line to somewhere, so do not to be too hard on yourself, do not try to seek perfection." Chrissy Houlahan on Electric Ladies Podcast     You'll also like: ·        Most Americans Want Climate Action, Study Says. How To Bridge The Political Divide, ELP Host Joan Michelson's article that includes Congresswoman Houlahan. ·        Women Rewriting The Climate Conversation, a panel from The Earth Day Women's Summit moderated by Joan Michelson ·        People Leveraging Carbon Markets to Save Their Land - with Stacey Solie, Executive Producer of the Documentary, "From the Ground Up" ·        The State of Energy Today Might Surprise You - with Lisa Jacobson, CEO of the Business Council for Sustainable Energy and Coauthor of the 2026 Energy Factbook ·        Hilary Doe, Michigan's Chief Growth Office on how the state is turning IRA Credits into Growth ·        Sherri Goodman, former Deputy Undersecretary of Defense, on why climate change is an issue of national security. ·        Joan Michelson's Forbes article on Fossil Fuels, War And Climate: Women On The Frontlines Call For A New Security Mindset Subscribe to our newsletter to receive our podcasts, articles, events and career advice – and special coaching offers. Elevate your career with expert coaching and ESG advisory with Electric Ladies Podcast. Unlock new opportunities, gain confidence, and achieve your career goals with the right guidance. Subscribe to our newsletter to receive our podcasts, articles, events and career advice – and special coaching offers. Thanks for subscribing on Apple Podcasts, iHeart Radio and Spotify and leaving us a review!   Don't forget to follow us on our socials Twitter: @joanmichelson LinkedIn: Electric Ladies Podcast with Joan Michelson Twitter: @joanmichelson

Are Climate Policies & Energy Shifts Part of a Bigger Global Strategy? New Claims Spark Debate

Clean energy funding under the GGRF remains frozen, with projects on hold and questions over federal spending authority unresolved. --- The $27 billion Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund has become a focal point of the Trump administration’s efforts to roll back federal clean energy policy. The program was designed to finance clean energy and emissions-reducing projects by channeling public funds through nonprofit financial institutions to attract private investment, including investments that support community resilience. After taking office in 2025, the administration moved to freeze funding and sought to terminate grant agreements that had already been awarded, citing concerns about oversight, conflicts of interest, and program design. Supporters argue the funds were lawfully appropriated and that the administration is attempting to unwind commitments based on claims that have not been substantiated in court. Roughly $20 billion of that funding now remains in limbo, with projects on hold. Senator Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island, ranking member of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, discusses how the program was designed to work, the administration’s stated rationale for shutting it down, and what the dispute could mean for clean energy investment and congressional authority over federal spending. Related Content Breaking the Lock on Urban Climate Finance: A Proposal for a Green Cities Guarantee Fund to Support Climate Resilient Infrastructure in Cities https://kleinmanenergy.upenn.edu/research/publications/breaking-the-lock-on-urban-climate-finance-a-proposal-for-a-green-cities-guarantee-fund-to-support-climate-resilient-infrastructure-in-cities/ Governing the Greenhouse Gas Protocol https://kleinmanenergy.upenn.edu/research/publications/governing-the-greenhouse-gas-protocol/ Energy Policy Now is produced by The Kleinman Center for Energy Policy at the University of Pennsylvania. For all things energy policy, visit kleinmanenergy.upenn.eduSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Trump's comments on China spark outrage, but is there a bigger geopolitical strategy behind the scenes? Tara and Lee break down the explosive Trump-Xi summit, the Iran oil chess game, Rubio's warning about nuclear Iran, and why China's grip on Tehran could reshape global power. Plus, the South Carolina Republican civil war erupts as establishment insiders battle Trump-backed redistricting and controversial AG candidate David Pascoe faces intense scrutiny. SHORT CLICKABLE TITLE Trump's China Gamble EXPOSED EPISODE SUMMARY Today's show dives deep into the backlash over President Trump's stunning comments about China, Xi Jinping, Chinese farmland ownership near military bases, and the growing tension over Iran's nuclear ambitions. Tara and Lee argue that while Trump's public praise of China sounds alarming, the real strategy may be economic warfare aimed at cutting Iran and Russia out of China's energy pipeline. The conversation explores claims that China secretly controls key Iranian infrastructure and discusses Marco Rubio's defense of Trump's hardline negotiating tactics. The hosts also examine the possibility that Trump is intentionally reshaping global oil markets to weaken adversaries while forcing China into dependence on American energy exports. In the second half, attention shifts to South Carolina politics, where accusations of a Republican “UniParty” establishment protecting Democrat-aligned candidates ignite a fierce internal battle. The show details controversy surrounding David Pascoe, redistricting fights, Lindsey Graham's influence, and allegations that establishment Republicans are undermining Trump-backed reforms. KEY TOPICS Trump's controversial China comments Xi Jinping and U.S.-China relations Iran nuclear tensions China's influence over Iran Oil politics and global energy markets Marco Rubio defending Trump strategy South Carolina Republican infighting Redistricting battle in South Carolina David Pascoe controversy Lindsey Graham and establishment Republicans SEO KEYWORDS Trump China deal, Trump Xi Jinping interview, Iran nuclear crisis, Marco Rubio Iran comments, China Iran alliance, South Carolina redistricting, David Pascoe controversy, Lindsey Graham criticism, Trump oil strategy, China buying American oil, SC GOP civil war, UniParty South Carolina, Trump energy policy, Iranian nuclear threat, Republican primary South Carolina THUMBNAIL TEXT CHINA GAMBLE? TRUMP'S SECRET STRATEGY SOCIAL MEDIA POST

Stay informed on current events, visit www.NaturalNews.com  - Power Cutoff for Nevada Residents Due to Data Centers (0:12) - Impact on Residential Real Estate and Legal Implications (6:03) - Challenges for Liberty Utilities and Alternative Energy Solutions (6:21) - Global Trends and Future Power Shortages (9:32) - The Role of Big Tech and Local Governments (15:19) - The Impact of Climate Cultism on Energy Policy (20:38) - Preparation and Solutions for Energy Shortages (24:49) - The Role of AI in Education and Employment (27:07) - The Future of Work and Entrepreneurship (28:53) - The Importance of Physical Gold and Silver (58:13) - Data Centers and Their Impact on Humanity (1:15:02) - Environmental and Social Concerns of Data Centers (1:18:17) - AI and Military Influence on Data Centers (1:23:29) - Technological Advancements and AI Projections (1:27:50) - AI Weaponization and Ethical Concerns (1:31:32) - China's Leadership in Technology and AI (1:50:18) - Energy and Resource Competition (1:55:28) - Global Economic and Environmental Impact (2:06:48) - Future Predictions and Strategic Outlook (2:11:29) Watch more independent videos at http://www.brighteon.com/channel/hrreport  ▶️ Support our mission by shopping at the Health Ranger Store - https://www.healthrangerstore.com ▶️ Check out exclusive deals and special offers at https://rangerdeals.com ▶️ Sign up for our newsletter to stay informed: https://www.naturalnews.com/Readerregistration.html Watch more exclusive videos here:

On today's AmperWave Daily, the hosts unpack a controversial claim making waves online and in political commentary: that major climate institutions have allegedly revised or scaled back long-standing worst-case climate scenarios. The discussion expands into media influence, political messaging, energy policy history, and how climate science has been used in public debate for decades. Note: This episode reflects commentary and claims made in the source transcript.

Tara breaks down why critics say the climate agenda is unraveling after new IPCC scenario revisions and growing political backlash. HOOK For decades, catastrophic climate predictions shaped energy policy, education, media coverage, and the global economy. Now critics claim the very institutions that promoted those warnings are quietly backing away from their most extreme scenarios — and Tara says the implications are enormous. DESCRIPTION A stunning debate erupts after new revisions from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change spark claims that the most catastrophic warming scenarios were never realistic to begin with. Tara argues the climate movement's “worst-case” predictions fueled massive economic damage, soaring energy costs, manufacturing decline, censorship campaigns, and fear-driven politics for years. The episode dives into how climate models influenced American energy policy under President Barack Obama, why critics say coal and manufacturing were deliberately gutted, and how media outlets are now shifting their messaging. Tara also revisits past predictions from Al Gore and questions how long climate change narratives will remain embedded in schools, politics, and public policy. KEY TOPICS IPCC revisions to extreme climate scenarios Debate over catastrophic climate predictions Energy policy and rising electricity costs Coal industry decline in America Manufacturing movement to China and India Climate change education in schools Media coverage and censorship allegations Political fallout from climate policy debates SEGMENTS SEGMENT 1 — “The Climate Narrative Shock” Tara opens with claims that the climate movement's most catastrophic predictions are quietly being abandoned. The discussion centers on recent IPCC scenario revisions and why critics view them as a major turning point in the climate debate. SEGMENT 2 — “The Cost of the Agenda” The episode explores how climate policy allegedly reshaped the American economy through energy regulations, rising electricity prices, and restrictions on coal production. Tara argues these policies accelerated the decline of U.S. manufacturing. SEGMENT 3 — “Media, Schools, and Fear” Attention turns to how climate change messaging spread through media coverage, education systems, and public institutions. Tara criticizes climate-focused curriculum in schools and argues generations were taught to fear environmental catastrophe. SEGMENT 4 — “The Political Reckoning” The show closes with discussion about changing political messaging around climate change and whether media organizations and Democratic leaders are beginning to retreat from earlier alarmist rhetoric. QUOTE OF THE DAY “It was their first big society-wide hoax.” SOCIAL MEDIA TEASER

Oil prices continue to climb as a result of the Iran war. We discuss how that has interfered with President Trump's planned energy policy. Plus, will the Republican presidential ticket have Vice President JD Vance or Secretary of State Marco Rubio at the top in 2028?This episode: political correspondent Ashley Lopez, business correspondent Camila Domonoske, and White House correspondents Danielle Kurtzleben and Franco Ordoñez.This podcast was produced by Casey Morell and Bria Suggs, and edited by Rachel Baye.Our executive producer is Muthoni Muturi.Listen to every episode of the NPR Politics Podcast sponsor-free, unlock access to bonus episodes with more from the NPR Politics team, and support public media when you sign up for The NPR Politics Podcast+ at plus.npr.org/politics.See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for sponsorship and to manage your podcast sponsorship preferences.NPR Privacy Policy

1. Michigan Political Commentary & Dearborn Focus A Michigan Senate candidate avoided discussing the killing of an Iranian Ayatollah due to concern that voters in Dearborn were “sad” about it. This is evidence of Democrats allegedly pandering to Islamist-sympathetic voters rather than condemning terrorism. Dearborn is characterized as politically influential and ideologically radical in this framing. “America-hating Islamists” are gaining influence within Democratic politics. Prominent progressive Democrats (e.g., Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib, AOC) are examples of this alleged trend. Support for or sympathy toward Iran, Hezbollah, or anti-Israel positions is portrayed as electorally strategic rather than principled. 3. Michigan Synagogue Attack Narrative A March synagogue attack in West Bloomfield, Michigan, which the FBI labeled Hezbollah-inspired terrorism. Details emphasized: Targeting of children inside a Jewish temple/school The attacker’s alleged ties to Hezbollah propaganda Failures in immigration vetting and firearm sales checks The incident is a sign of systemic risks posed by insufficient counterterrorism enforcement. Strong criticism is directed at U.S. agencies for allowing a naturalized citizen with alleged terrorist connections to enter and remain in the country. These failures are do to broader Democratic positions on borders, DHS funding, and national security. Vetting lapses are deliberate policy choices rather than administrative failures. 5. Energy Policy and National Security Argument Using a Washington Post editorial as validation, the text criticizes green energy policies in: Germany Taiwan California The central claim: anti-nuclear and fossil fuel policies weaken national resilience during geopolitical crises. Energy independence is presented as a core national security issue, not just an environmental one. 6. ActBlue and Foreign Donor Allegations The New York Times is reporting that ActBlue may have misled Congress about vetting foreign donations. Key claims include: Potential acceptance of illegal foreign contributions Legal warnings from ActBlue’s own law firm Risk of criminal investigation or shutdown This is evidence of foreign interference benefiting Democrats electorally. Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz X: https://x.com/tedcruz X: https://x.com/benfergusonshowYouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruzSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

1. Michigan Hezbollah‑Inspired Terror Attack An attack on a synagogue and school in West Bloomfield, Michigan, was an act of Hezbollah‑inspired terrorism. The attacker is: A naturalized U.S. citizen with ties to Hezbollah Motivated by Iranian and Hezbollah propaganda Intending mass casualty violence against Jewish children The discussion emphasizes: Failures in immigration vetting Government databases allegedly flagged the individual Criticism of federal agencies for allowing entry and naturalization Media is downplaying or sanitizing extremist motives by using neutral labels like “Michigan Man.” 2. Democratic Party Accused of “Coddling” Radical Islamism Democrats enable or sympathize with radical Islamist movements Anti‑terror enforcement has been weakened through policy choices and funding decisions Department of Homeland Security funding and confirmation votes are cited as proof of institutional neglect. Terrorism is the result of Biden era policy consequences. 3. New York Politics & Mamdani Criticism A New York political figure (Mamdani) is: Opposing U.S. military action against Iran Framing the Iran conflict as morally unjustified and financially wasteful Defending or excusing the Iranian regime Ignoring Iran’s role in killing Americans and sponsoring terrorism This is symptomatic of the radical ideological shift within Democratic politics. 4. Michigan Democratic Senate Candidate & Dearborn Comments A Michigan Senate candidate is criticized for: Avoiding condemnation of Iran or the Ayatollah Citing that people in Dearborn are “sad” about the Ayatollah’s death Leaked or recorded strategy discussions are used to argue the candidate: Prioritizes electoral politics over national security Is willing to deflect using domestic political attacks rather than address terrorism The commentary suggests this reflects electoral influence from Islamist‑sympathetic constituencies. 5. Energy Policy & California “Self‑Inflicted Energy Crisis” The final section shifts to energy security, citing a Washington Post editorial. Green energy policies in Germany, Taiwan, and California weakened energy resilience The Iran conflict exposed dependence on unstable global energy supply chains California is highlighted for: Unique fuel regulations Closure of refineries Dependence on overseas imports Renewable energy is insufficient for baseload reliability. Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz X: https://x.com/tedcruz X: https://x.com/benfergusonshowYouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruzSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.