Podcasts about energy policies

Critical Minerals, Energy and A.I. – Liv Carroll, Critical Minerals Expert, former Managing Director - EMEA Mining Lead and Global Natural Resources Lead for Data & A.I. at Accenture   "The energy transition is certainly where critical minerals started, but now we're obviously supporting all of the digital technology and the AI infrastructure such as data centers and others…now, there are conversations addressing the minerals required to feed this ginormous population of over 8 billion that we have because that is actually not possible without mining certain minerals that then go into the fertilizers to ensure that we have sufficient yields to feed the population of the planet…There's another factor as well as them being at risk of a supply shock." Liv Carroll on Electric Ladies Podcast   There are uses of critical minerals that we may not think about, such as how they are critical to our food supply. Now we have a huge need for them with the rapid expansion of data centers and A.I. as well as the rest of our electronics, appliances, computers, automobiles, weaponry and aircraft. But they are also at the mercy of geopolitical and economic forces, and the climate. What do we need to know? Listen to Liv Carroll, a top critical minerals expert for over 20 years who recently served as Managing Director - EMEA Mining Lead and Global Natural Resources Lead for Data & A.I. at Accenture in this illuminating conversation with Electric Ladies Podcast host Joan Michelson. Liv has also served on the board of Women in Mining and on the board of the Global Mining Guidelines group for many years. You'll hear about: ●        How critical minerals are vital to our food supply for this massive population. ●        Where and how critical mineral supplies are at the mercy of geopolitical and economic forces, as well as climate change. ●        The role of critical minerals in "responsible A.I."….and so much more. ●        Plus, career advice, such as:   "I think it's really important to gather along the way a number of people that you feel it's not just that they wave a flag for you and they're a cheerleader, but you feel that they seriously, they see you, you don't have to explain yourself for what you meant by something that you said to them…the people who really get you, you don't have to elaborate.… And they are often not in the company you are working in at the moment.  They could in fact be a boss from a previous company….The other piece of advice I would say is continue adding strings to your bow. And they might not be the strings that you think you would want or need, but as you get into later stages in your career, they're the strings that will stand you apart." Liv Carroll on Electric Ladies Podcast   Subscribe to our newsletter to receive our podcasts, blog, events and special coaching offers.   You'll also like: ·       Critical Minerals 101: Abby Wulf, Critical Minerals Expert, Former Head of Critical Minerals at the Dept. Of Energy, & Center for Critical Minerals Strategy ·       The State of Energy Today Might Surprise You - with Lisa Jacobson, President of the Business Council for Sustainable Energy on their 2026 Energy Factbook ·       Managing IT in the Midst of a Tech Revolution - with Elizabeth Hackenson, Chief Information Officer, Schneider Electric ·       What We Can Learn From Canada's Energy Policies – with Claire Seaborn, energy attorney and former Chief of Staff to the Canadian Minister of Energy and Natural Resources ·       Reducing The IT Sector's Carbon Footprint – with Monica Batchelder, Chief Sustainability Officer of HPE (Hewlett Packard Enterprises) ·       Making Computers Sustainably – with Page Motes, Chief Sustainability Officer at Dell Technologies Subscribe to our newsletter to receive our podcasts, blog, events and special coaching offers. Thanks for subscribing on Apple Podcasts or iHeartRadio and leaving us a review! Follow us on Twitter @joanmichelson

Southwest Power Pool’s expansion into the West marks a major step toward greater regional coordination of the electric grid. --- Earlier this year the Southwest Power Pool, the electric grid operator for much of the central United States, expanded into the Western Interconnection, becoming the first Regional Transmission Organization to operate in both the Eastern and Western grids. The move comes as Western utilities seek to address rising electricity demand, the integration of growing amounts of clean energy, and concerns about future grid reliability, challenges that broader regional coordination may help address. SPP plans to build on that expansion with Markets+, a new regional market initiative scheduled to launch in 2027. Together, these efforts represent one of the most significant pushes yet toward greater electricity market coordination in the American West. They also come as California’s grid operator pursues its own effort to expand regional market participation through its Extended Day-Ahead Market, or EDAM, giving Western utilities multiple paths toward closer regional integration, each with different approaches to governance and market oversight. On the podcast, SPP Chief Executive Officer Lanny Nickell discusses SPP’s expansion into the West and the development of Markets+. He explains why Western utilities are becoming more interested in regional coordination, the tradeoffs between independence and larger markets, and what these developments may mean for the future of the electric grid in the American West. Lanny Nickell is the Chief Executive Officer of Southwest Power Pool. Related Content Mobile Energy Storage: Flexibility for the Energy Transition https://kleinmanenergy.upenn.edu/research/publications/mobile-energy-storage-flexibility-for-the-energy-transition/ Congestion in General Equilibrium: Nodal Electricity Pricing, Production, and Welfare https://kleinmanenergy.upenn.edu/research/publications/congestion-in-general-equilibrium-nodal-electricity-pricing-production-and-welfare/ Energy Policy Now is produced by The Kleinman Center for Energy Policy at the University of Pennsylvania. For all things energy policy, visit kleinmanenergy.upenn.edu.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

As this is episode one of Down to Agribusiness, we have given all our listeners free access. From global geopolitics to Irish farmgate finances, our new podcast - Down to Agribusiness connects the dots on the stories driving the agri-food sector.Stephen Robb and Lorcan Roche Kelly unpack the market reaction to the latest US-Iran peace agreement and what easing tensions in the Middle East could mean for energy prices, commodity markets and the wider agricultural economy.The pair also dive into the latest farmer business developments making headlines, examine the recent movement in Tirlán share values, and discuss one of the biggest renewables projects currently on the horizon.Plus, in a special interview, Glanbia CEO Hugh McGuire joins the podcast for an in-depth conversation on the future of Ireland's largest agribusiness, industry challenges, growth opportunities and what lies ahead for farmers and shareholders alike.Whether you're following the markets, watching your farm business costs, or keeping an eye on the future of Irish agriculture, this week's Down to Agribusiness has you covered.Subscribe now and join us for the conversations shaping the future of Irish agribusiness. https://eu1.hubs.ly/H0wdmVw0 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this episode, we're joined by Doug Burghum, the Secretary of the Interior and former Governor of North Dakota. From his humble beginnings as a young man from a small town in North Dakota to building a successful software company that was acquired by Microsoft, Doug's journey is a testament to the power of risk-taking and innovation. As Secretary of the Interior, Doug is responsible for managing the nation's public lands, natural resources, and cultural heritage. He shares his insights on the importance of balancing recreational activities like rock climbing with the need to protect wildlife habitats. He also discusses the new climbing rules announced by the Department of Interior, which aim to strike a balance between these competing interests. Doug's conversation with Ross also delves into his experiences as a successful entrepreneur and his transition to public service. He talks about the importance of taking calculated risks and making tough decisions, citing his own story of mortgaging his family's farm to start his software company. He also highlights the need for a more balanced approach to energy production, citing the example of Colorado, which is missing out on revenue and economic opportunities due to its anti-energy policies. In this episode, you'll hear Doug's unique perspective on the intersection of energy policy, economic development, and public lands management. He shares his insights on how states like Colorado can benefit from a more balanced approach to energy production and how this can drive economic growth and innovation. Join us as we explore these important topics and more with Secretary Doug Burghum.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this episode of American Potential, host David From sits down with U.S. Senator Alan Armstrong to discuss one of the biggest barriers to American growth: the broken permitting process. Drawing on decades of experience in the energy industry, Senator Armstrong explains how excessive regulation, legal challenges, and bureaucratic overlap have made it nearly impossible to build critical infrastructure—even when projects are already completed. From billion-dollar pipelines being shut down to states blocking interstate energy projects, he highlights the real-world consequences for energy costs, reliability, and national security. The conversation also explores key legislation like the SPEED Act and the PERMIT Act, and why meaningful reform requires more than surface-level fixes. Armstrong shares his perspective on what policymakers often get wrong—and why now is a critical moment to get it right. This episode offers a behind-the-scenes look at how policy decisions shape America's ability to build, compete, and thrive—and why fixing permitting is essential to the country's future.

What a day on the EnergyNews Beat News Desk, we have 10 big stories for you, and as we were filming this, President Trump calls off the plans - wow, changed everything. David Blackmon's Energy Additions Stops by the Energy News Beat Stand Up as we used one of his stories on blackmon.substack.com.Make no mistakes, this war will end in one of two ways. World War III, or the Venezuelan-style controls on Iran, as they have shown themselves to be an untrustworthy neighbor and have murdered tens of thousands of their own citizens.As David and I were signing on to film the podcast, President Trump called off the strikes to take Kharg Island, and I am hoping this is to reposition assets and give some surprise to their capture. The oil markets dropped to $87. 94 for WTI, and this brings up the Paper trading versus the Physical delivery price of $140.1. Iran Geopolitical Crisis & Military StrategyThe hosts extensively discuss U.S.-Iran tensions, focusing on President Trump's shifting positions on military strikes and seizing Cargo Island. They analyze three phases of military action: (1) stabilizing oil prices by moving ships through the Strait of Hormuz, (2) degrading Iran's military capabilities, and (3) direct action inside Iran. A key point is that without “Venezuelan-style controls” on Iran's oil exports, hostile actors could profit significantly.2. Oil Markets & Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR)The podcast explores why physical oil prices exceed $140 while futures trade below $100. Key factors include China's reduced crude imports (4 million barrels/day reduction), alternative export routes bypassing the Strait of Hormuz (7-10 million barrels/day), and tanker truck alternatives. Critically, they warn that the U.S. SPR is dangerously low—only 6.1 weeks away from the safe operational level of 300 million barrels.3. Global Energy Infrastructure & Pipeline DevelopmentMultiple countries are building alternatives to the Strait of Hormuz to reduce Iran's leverage. Kuwait is negotiating pipelines with Saudi Arabia and UAE. Japan signed a major LNG deal. This reflects a broader theme: the world is reducing dependence on chokepoints Iran controls.4. U.S. Energy Policy & Data CentersGovernor Abbott's directive requires data centers in Texas to fund their own electrical infrastructure, protecting the grid. Texas is becoming the data center capital (second only to Virginia), with massive natural gas reserves in the Permian Basin to support expansion.5. Natural Gas Pipeline ExpansionKendra Morgan's Gulf Express pipeline expansion will come online soon, preventing flaring and enabling 4.5 BCF of new Permian outbound capacity by 2026—a significant development for energy markets.6. Banking & Investment in Fossil FuelsThe world's 65 largest banks invested $906 billion in fossil fuels in 2025, with the Iran conflict expected to escalate exploration, production, and energy security spending. The ordering of 250 supertankers signals long-term confidence in oil demand.7. Political Concerns & Congressional DysfunctionWe express frustration with President Trump's inconsistent messaging on Iran policy and criticize Congress for its lack of support, calling for primary challenges against most incumbents.All of these stories are on the Energy News Beat website - the World's Best Podcast Show Notes. 1.Trump: US Will 'Assume Total Control' Of Iran's Oil Infrastructure2.President Trump Announces Plans to Strike Iran Again and Take Control of Kharg Island, Echoing Venezuelan-Style Oil Controls3.Why Oil Is Still Below $100 a Barrel When Physical Oil Is Over $1404.The Tale of Two SPRs and Different Uses: US and China Navigate the Iran War Supply Shock5.Full Story on the Downed Apache – Part of Getting 22 Tankers through the Gulf6.Kuwait Oil Chief Seeks Pipeline Alternatives to Skirt Hormuz7.Japan Inks Major LNG Deal as Energy Markets Focus Away from Hormuz8.Texas Gov. Abbott Directs PUC and ERCOT to Shield Texans from Data Center and Infrastructure Costs9.Kinder Morgan's Gulf Coast Express Expansion About to Come On Line – And It Will Impact More Than Natural Gas Prices10.World's 65 Biggest Banks Pumped $906 Billion Into Fossil Fuels in 2025. The Iran War will escalate exploration and production, pipelines, and energy security spending and financing.Check out the Energy News Beat SubStack https://theenergynewsbeat.substack.com/A shout-out to Steve Reese and the Reese Energy Consulting group for sponsoring the Podcast https://reeseenergyconsulting.com/.Data2 if you have any business systems, can you trust A? Well, they have the patent on validation. . https://data2.zoholandingpage.com/energyAnd we have WellDatabase rolling in as a new sponsor. https://welldatabase.com/

A federal appeals court rejected a suit filed by 22 young Montanans that challenges several executive orders signed by President Trump in early 2025.

For years, electricity prices broadly tracked inflation. New pressures may be changing that. --- Electricity prices have become a major political issue in the United States, with policymakers increasingly focused on rising utility bills and the costs of meeting growing electricity demand. At the same time, renewable energy has often been blamed for driving prices higher. But what does the data actually show? Ryan Hledik of The Brattle Group discusses research conducted with Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory on U.S. electricity price trends. The research finds that, nationally, electricity prices have largely tracked inflation, though significant regional differences tell a more complicated story. Hledik explains the factors that really drive electricity prices, the role of renewable energy, natural gas, and infrastructure investment, and why electricity costs vary so dramatically across the country. Hledik also explores whether 2025, when electricity prices rose faster than inflation nationally, marks the beginning of a new era of rising electricity prices, or a temporary departure from a longer-term trend. Ryan Hledik is an alumni policy advisor with the Kleinman Center for Energy Policy and a principal with The Brattle Group. Related Content: Congestion in General Equilibrium: Nodal Electricity Pricing, Production, and Welfare https://kleinmanenergy.upenn.edu/research/publications/congestion-in-general-equilibrium-nodal-electricity-pricing-production-and-welfare/ Boomtowns in the Battery Belt: Risks and Opportunities of Clean Energy Investments in Small Towns of America https://kleinmanenergy.upenn.edu/research/publications/boomtowns-in-the-battery-belt-risks-and-opportunities-of-clean-energy-investments-in-small-towns-of-america/ How PJM Is Grappling With Data Center Power Demand https://kleinmanenergy.upenn.edu/commentary/podcast/how-pjm-is-grappling-with-data-center-power-demand/ Energy Policy Now is produced by The Kleinman Center for Energy Policy at the University of Pennsylvania. For all things energy policy, visit kleinmanenergy.upenn.edu.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

This Day in Legal History: The Burning of the GaspeeOn this day in 1772, a Royal Navy revenue schooner called HMS Gaspee, captained by a notably overzealous Lieutenant William Duddington, ran aground in shallow water in Narragansett Bay while chasing a Rhode Island packet boat called the Hannah. Within hours of the grounding, roughly sixty Providence merchants, sailors, and “Sons of Liberty” — led by John Brown, one of the wealthiest men in the colony — rowed out under cover of darkness in eight longboats, boarded the Gaspee, shot Duddington, and burned the ship to the waterline. The legal significance lies in what came next. The Crown convened a Royal Commission of Inquiry with authority to ship the perpetrators across the Atlantic for trial in England, bypassing colonial juries entirely, a procedural maneuver that the colonies read as a direct attack on the right to jury trial in the vicinage.The Virginia House of Burgesses responded in March 1773 by forming the first Committee of Correspondence, a sustained intercolonial communication network that became, two years later, the institutional skeleton of the Continental Congress. The Gaspee Affair never produced a single prosecution — the commission could not get the colonial governor or the Rhode Island courts to cooperate, and witness testimony evaporated — but it produced something more durable: the colonial conviction that the Crown's willingness to detour around local juries was itself a constitutional grievance worth organizing against. The right-to-jury-in-the-vicinage point that Madison wrote into the Sixth Amendment seventeen years later is, in a real sense, the Gaspee Affair's longest-lived legacy.The Supreme Court on Monday granted, vacated, and remanded the D.C. Circuit's decision in American Gas Association v. Department of Energy, sending the long-disputed Biden-era Department of Energy efficiency rule on non-condensing residential gas furnaces and commercial water heaters back to the D.C. Circuit “for further consideration in light of the position asserted by the Solicitor General.” That last phrase is the operative one. The new Solicitor General, on behalf of the second Trump administration's DOE, told the Court in late April that the prior administration's reading of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act was, in DOE's current view, wrong, and that the rule effectively bans non-condensing units that millions of homes and small commercial properties were built around. A confessed-error from a new administration doesn't automatically win a case, but the procedural vehicle — a grant-vacate-remand, or “GVR” — is the Court's standard way of saying “go look at this again with the new posture in mind” without resolving the merits itself.The trade-group plaintiffs, led by the American Gas Association and the American Public Gas Association, framed the rule from the start as a de facto product ban dressed up as efficiency standards. The environmental and consumer groups that intervened to defend the rule will get another bite at the apple on remand, but their position is harder when their own client agency has switched sides. Watch the D.C. Circuit's case calendar over the next few weeks for an expedited briefing schedule.Supreme Court Vacates Decision Outlawing Gas Stoves, Water Heaters | NewsBustersSCOTUSblog on Monday published a careful overview of an increasingly organized litigation campaign to ask the Supreme Court to overrule Obergefell v. Hodges, the 2015 decision recognizing a constitutional right to same-sex marriage. The campaign now includes Liberty Counsel, MassResistance, and the Southern Baptist Convention, which last year voted overwhelmingly to urge the Court to reverse the decision. The underlying ground for the push is partly the Court's reasoning in Dobbs four years ago, which gave conservative litigants a road map for unwinding substantive due process precedents, and partly the gradual erosion of public-opinion support for same-sex marriage in one slice of the polling, with Republican support falling from 55 percent in 2022 to 37 percent now. The legal headcount at the Court is, however, the part of the story that is not yet there.Only Justice Thomas has been a consistent vote to revisit Obergefell, having said so in his Dobbs concurrence. Justice Alito, despite being one of Obergefell's original dissenters, recently emphasized in a public speech that he is not suggesting the case should be overruled, citing stare decisis. Justice Gorsuch's dissent in 303 Creative seems to concede that Obergefell is good law and tries instead to carve out specific exceptions to it. None of which is a reason for litigants on the marriage-equality side to relax. The path Dobbs opened up is wider than any single justice's current voting pattern, and the campaign is plainly playing a long game.The next round of test cases on standing and ripeness will start to surface in the lower courts in the next term or two — that is when the campaign's seriousness becomes measurable.The campaign to overrule Obergefell | SCOTUSblogThe third and most constitutionally significant story of the day is one we've been watching: the litigation over President Trump's $400 million ballroom — built on the site of the demolished East Wing — is on track to land in front of the Supreme Court, SCOTUSblog reported Monday. The D.C. Circuit panel that heard the case for more than two hours in late April has not yet ruled, but the questioning made clear that a more substantial opinion is coming and that an appeal to the Court is the likely next stop regardless of which side wins. The legal question is unusually fundamental. The plaintiff, the National Trust for Historic Preservation, argues that the President has no “free-floating” power to construct major federal buildings without an appropriation from Congress, and that the Antideficiency Act and the Public Buildings Act both require the kind of statutory authorization the East Wing ballroom never received.The administration's response, delivered in a tone that several court-watchers described as unusually defiant, has essentially been that construction has “gone too far to be stopped” and that the courts have no role in second-guessing a presidential building decision once the steel is up. The structural separation-of-powers questions here — what does the Appropriations Clause actually constrain, and can a federal court enjoin a President from continuing to build something that is partially constructed — are large enough that the Supreme Court will almost certainly want to take the case if it reaches the high court. Construction, meanwhile, continues. The most likely Supreme Court resolution is a narrow opinion on standing or remedies, with the broader Appropriations Clause questions deferred for another day. We will see.White House ballroom battle may soon arrive at the Supreme Court | SCOTUSblogIn my Bloomberg Tax column this week, I argue that the SALT deduction cap's biggest problem is not that it is unconstitutional, but that it is badly designed. The latest failed challenge, Sims v. United States, involved two New Jersey taxpayers who claimed the cap violated the 10th Amendment, the 16th Amendment, and broader federalism principles. The federal district court rejected those arguments, finding that Congress has broad authority to tax income and decide which deductions are allowed, limited, or denied. My point is that opponents of the SALT cap should stop looking for constitutional defects that courts are unlikely to find and instead focus on forcing Congress to fix the policy it created.I explain that the cap has always been politically loaded: supporters see it as a needed limit on a deduction that benefits many high-income taxpayers in high-tax states, while critics see it as a targeted attack on those states. But unfair or politically motivated tax policy is not automatically unconstitutional. The real weakness, I argue, is the cap's uneven design, especially the pass-through entity tax workaround. Many business owners can effectively get around the cap when state taxes are paid at the entity level, while wage earners, sole proprietors, and many individual taxpayers remain stuck behind it.That creates a serious mismatch: two taxpayers can live in the same state, earn similar income, and face similar state tax burdens, but receive different federal treatment depending on whether one has the right business structure. I argue that this kind of selective relief may be a more promising target for a narrower administrative or legal challenge than another broad constitutional attack on Congress's taxing power. Congress partly recognized the problem when it raised the cap from $10,000 to $40,000, but I note that the fix is temporary, only lightly indexed, and still leaves major structural problems in place. The marriage penalty remains especially glaring because married couples filing jointly do not receive double the cap available to similarly situated unmarried taxpayers.I also criticize the phaseout design because it can create cliffs or marginal-rate spikes that reward tax gamesmanship rather than sound policy. A better fix, in my view, would make the higher cap permanent, index it meaningfully, eliminate the marriage penalty, smooth out the phaseout, and require Treasury to rationalize the treatment of pass-through entity taxes. The lesson from Sims is that courts may uphold the SALT cap, but that does not make it good tax policy. If the cap is unfair, incoherent, or selectively porous, Congress owns that problem.SALT Deduction Cap Falls Short in Design, Not Constitutionality This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

Next, Nevena and Paul are joined live on air by Rohan Best, Assoc Prof – Dept of Economics, Macquarie Business School; as they discuss cost-of-living relief through energy policy and pricing. Rohan's research covers economics and finance, including energy economics and household finance. His publications have been in journals such as Energy Economics, Ecological Economics, Environmental and Resource Economics, Energy Policy, Applied Energy, the Energy Journal, the Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, the Economic Record, the Australian Journal of Public Administration, and the Journal of Cleaner Production. He is  interested in policy development to reduce inequality and improve cost-effectiveness, such as through equitable reverse auctions. The post Sat, 6th June, 2026: Rohan Best, Assoc Prof – Dept of Economics, Macquarie Business School; Cost-of-living relief through energy policy and pricing appeared first on Saturday Magazine.

In this episode of the Energy Vista Podcast, Leslie Palti-Guzman sits down with energy scholar and foreign policy expert Brenda Shaffer to discuss the energy policy implications of the Iran crisis and disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz.Brenda argues that policymakers continue to draw the wrong lessons from energy crises. The conversation explores whether some climate policies have weakened energy security. Leslie and Brenda exchange on the role of natural gas in modern economies, Europe's energy challenges, Africa's missed energy investment opportunities, China's growing influence over clean-energy supply chains, and the future of electrification.Listen & Subscribe

White House Deputy Press Secretary Kush Desai joins Marc Cox to discuss President Trump's work ethic, media accessibility, energy policy, and ongoing negotiations with Iran. Desai also addresses criticism of the president, the administration's support for domestic energy production, and efforts to support American farmers while maintaining stability in global energy markets.

Julie McNamara is a Federal Energy Policy Director with the Climate and Energy Program at the Union of Concerned Scientists.

Kim Farrington, a candidate for the U.S. Senate in Virginia, stopped by the EnergyNews Beat Podcast to discuss her campaign strategy of listening to Virginia voters and addressing their concerns. Wow, I had a lot of fun visiting with Kim, and she hit all of the right marks on the Podcast. She supports the 2nd Amendment and America First, and has put about 49,000 miles on her car, driving around Virginia to listen and gather feedback on policies, waste, and energy. Her experience in accounting and in managing large federal budgets, while ensuring audits pass, is extensive. She highlighted her experience in the federal government, including her work as a chief financial officer, and her plans to tackle fraud and inefficiencies if elected. Farrington expressed support for President Trump's agenda and the importance of putting America first. She also shared her views on energy policy, emphasizing the need for data-driven decision-making and accountability in renewable energy.We have offered to help with energy policies and get information for her campaign, as she is data-driven. That was one of the key points that hit me today. She loves data and wants to curb waste and fraud. Please reach out to Kim at the Campaign website to donate or contact her office. https://kimforvirginia.com/1. Political Campaign & CandidacyKim Farrington is running as a candidate for U.S. Senate in Virginia to replace Mark Warner. She emphasizes her extensive listening tour (19 months, 48,000+ miles) where she engages directly with Virginia voters to understand their concerns and propose data-driven solutions.2. Government Fraud & InefficienciesA central theme of her campaign is combating fraud and waste in federal government. With 33 years of federal service experience, Kim claims to have identified over $236 billion in fraud and inefficiencies and aims to write legislation to recover these funds for taxpayers.3. Energy Policy & Grid ManagementExtensive discussion on Virginia's energy mix (56% natural gas, 26% nuclear, 8% solar, 3.4% coal, etc.) and the challenges of renewable energy integration. Key points include:Wind and solar subsidies and their true costs to consumersGrid resiliency and the need for proper data on renewable performanceThe importance of nuclear energy as clean, reliable baseload powerEnvironmental liabilities from wind and solar farms (estimated $89 billion)4. Second Amendment & Constitutional RightsKim's strong support for the Second Amendment (influenced by her Texas parents who owned a gun store) and her alignment with President Trump's agenda on constitutional issues.5. Voting Integrity & Election SecuritySupport for the SAVE Act to protect voting through internal controls, auditability, and accountability in election processes.6. Data-Driven Policy MakingKim's commitment to consulting experts and relying on data rather than ideology when making policy decisions, particularly regarding energy, data centers, and government spending.7. Support for Trump's AgendaEmphasis on "America First" principles and support for President Trump's anti-fraud task force and cabinet appointments.Check out the Energy News Beat SubStack https://theenergynewsbeat.substack.com/A shout-out to Steve Reese and the Reese Energy Consulting group for sponsoring the Podcast https://reeseenergyconsulting.com/.Data2 if you have any business systems, can you trust A? Well, they have the patent on validation. . https://data2.zoholandingpage.com/energyAnd we have WellDatabase rolling in as a new sponsor. https://welldatabase.com/

What's going on in Global Trade this Week? Today Pete Mento and Doug Draper cover: 6:32 -Cutting Carriers  Selection Liability 10:45 -US Oil Reserves & Energy Policy 13:21 -Halftime 20:59 -US & Taiwan Finalize Trade Agreement 23:39-The Jones Act: Waivers and Reasons www.capwwide.com/international-insights/6/2/26/gttw-podcast-episode-245 https://youtu.be/JMp14AoF__E  

Within the government, there's quiet confidence the battery boom will continue to gather pace and help shield Australia from both global shocks and domestic demand surges, driving prices even lower.

"While the word 'climate' may be politically charged for some, the need for affordable, reliable, and secure energy is something we can all agree on. Americans are calling for action, and as Members of Congress it's our responsibility to deliver. If we want long-term solutions that address both our constituents' concerns and growing climate risks, we must work together to strengthen our energy and climate security with urgency." Congresswoman Chrissy Houlahan to Electric Ladies Podcast  As we in the U.S. commemorate Memorial Day this week and express gratitude for the sacrifice of thousands of servicemembers on behalf of our country, we are re-airing a landmark interview from last year with an Air Force veteran and Congresswoman who is working tirelessly and on a bipartisan basis to protect the climate and our energy systems. Listen to Congresswoman Chrissy Houlahan of Pennsylvania, who is co-chair of the Bipartisan Climate Solutions Caucus, a rare example of cooperation on Capitol Hill. She's also co-chair of the bipartisan Women in STEM Caucus and shares insights into how to build bipartisanship, protect our infrastructure from extreme climate events and provide clean, affordable energy.   You'll hear about: ·        How Pennsylvania's political landscape shapes the path of climate legislation ·        What the Bipartisan Climate Solutions Caucus is doing to advance the clean energy transition ·        How extreme weather events can open the door to bipartisan climate action ·        Why Congresswoman Houlahan's leadership with the Women in STEM Caucus matters ·        Plus, insightful career advice   "Recognize that whatever you choose to do right now is not the end decision for the rest of your life. When you look backwards it's going to make sense, but when you look forward, it's going to be a crooked line. It's not going to be a straight line to somewhere, so do not to be too hard on yourself, do not try to seek perfection." Chrissy Houlahan on Electric Ladies Podcast     You'll also like: ·        Most Americans Want Climate Action, Study Says. How To Bridge The Political Divide, ELP Host Joan Michelson's article that includes Congresswoman Houlahan. ·        Women Rewriting The Climate Conversation, a panel from The Earth Day Women's Summit moderated by Joan Michelson ·        People Leveraging Carbon Markets to Save Their Land - with Stacey Solie, Executive Producer of the Documentary, "From the Ground Up" ·        The State of Energy Today Might Surprise You - with Lisa Jacobson, CEO of the Business Council for Sustainable Energy and Coauthor of the 2026 Energy Factbook ·        Hilary Doe, Michigan's Chief Growth Office on how the state is turning IRA Credits into Growth ·        Sherri Goodman, former Deputy Undersecretary of Defense, on why climate change is an issue of national security. ·        Joan Michelson's Forbes article on Fossil Fuels, War And Climate: Women On The Frontlines Call For A New Security Mindset Subscribe to our newsletter to receive our podcasts, articles, events and career advice – and special coaching offers. Elevate your career with expert coaching and ESG advisory with Electric Ladies Podcast. Unlock new opportunities, gain confidence, and achieve your career goals with the right guidance. Subscribe to our newsletter to receive our podcasts, articles, events and career advice – and special coaching offers. Thanks for subscribing on Apple Podcasts, iHeart Radio and Spotify and leaving us a review!   Don't forget to follow us on our socials Twitter: @joanmichelson LinkedIn: Electric Ladies Podcast with Joan Michelson Twitter: @joanmichelson

As fossil fuels face growing competition from renewables, a new global order is emerging. A world of powerful 'petrostates' and rising 'electrostates' where energy security, industrial power and geopolitics are becoming deeply intertwined. What does that mean for the US, China, Russia, the Gulf and Europe? To discuss this, I'm joined by Tatiana Mitrova, a Global Fellow at Columbia University's Center on Global Energy Policy.

The AgNet News Hour continued its special four-part interview series with California Policy Center Director of Water and Energy Policy Edward Ring, this time shifting focus from water to the state's escalating oil, gas, and energy challenges. Part four of the series will air Memorial Day. Ring joined hosts Nick Papagni and Josh McGill to explain why California drivers continue paying some of the highest fuel prices in the nation despite the state sitting on enormous oil reserves and possessing some of the strictest environmental regulations in the world. “We are importing refined gasoline from refineries in Asia,” Ring said while discussing California's growing dependence on overseas fuel supplies. According to Ring, California now imports roughly 20 percent of its refined gasoline after shutting down multiple refineries over recent years. He warned that the state's increasing reliance on imported fuel is driving prices even higher for consumers and businesses alike. “That adds 50 cents to a dollar to the price of gasoline right there,” Ring explained. The conversation focused heavily on how energy costs directly impact agriculture through fuel prices, freight, fertilizer production, processing costs, and transportation throughout the food supply chain. Ring argued that California's energy policies are making the state less competitive while simultaneously forcing businesses and jobs to leave. “We have the cleanest, most strictly regulated oil drilling and refining industry in the world,” he said. One of the more surprising parts of the interview involved Ring's explanation that increased oil production in California could actually improve air quality in places like Los Angeles by reducing natural methane seepage and limiting pollution from overseas oil tankers waiting offshore. “You could actually improve the air quality in Los Angeles if you drilled for more oil,” Ring said. The discussion also explored how shrinking oil production is hurting communities throughout Kern County and towns like Taft, where generations of families have depended on energy jobs. “When jobs go away, people have to move out,” hosts said while discussing the long-term economic impact on rural California communities. Ring warned that uncertainty surrounding California regulations is discouraging long-term investment in energy infrastructure, pipelines, and refining capacity. “You can't demand companies lose money,” he said while discussing why businesses continue leaving the state. The interview also turned toward California's broader climate and renewable energy policies, including offshore wind, electric vehicle mandates, and rising electricity costs. Ring criticized what he described as an “energy scarcity” strategy that artificially increases energy prices in order to force adoption of alternative technologies that still remain expensive and difficult to scale. “That's why electricity is 30 cents a kilowatt hour in California,” he said. Beyond energy, hosts connected the discussion back to agriculture and the upcoming governor race, arguing that farming, food production, water, and energy policy remain deeply interconnected issues that have received too little attention during recent statewide debates. “We need solutions,” hosts emphasized repeatedly throughout the broadcast. The episode also featured an interview with Huma Chief Sales and Marketing Officer Fred Nichols, discussing SurfMax, a new water management product now registered in California that aims to help growers improve irrigation efficiency and nutrient delivery. As the Edward Ring series continues into Memorial Day, the AgNet News Hour remains focused on how California policy decisions surrounding water, energy, and agriculture could shape the future of farming and rural communities statewide. Listen to the full interview below or on your favorite podcast app.

The AgNet News Hour continued its special multi-part interview series with California water and energy policy expert Edward Ring, diving deeper into the state's ongoing water crisis, Delta management failures, SGMA concerns, desalination opportunities, and the growing political battle surrounding California agriculture. Part three of the series will air Friday, with the final installment scheduled for Memorial Day. Ring, Director of Water and Energy Policy at the California Policy Center, continued outlining what he believes are common-sense solutions to California's long-running water shortages while criticizing decades of political inaction and overregulation. “It's not right,” Ring said while discussing continued low water allocations for farmers despite several strong water years across California. One of the major themes throughout the interview centered on how much water continues flowing out to the Pacific Ocean instead of being stored or redirected for agricultural and municipal use. “Twenty-seven million acre feet went to the ocean,” Ring explained while reviewing recent wet-year runoff totals. According to Ring, California's existing infrastructure and regulatory system are failing to capture excess water during wet years, even while farmers continue receiving reduced allocations and facing groundwater restrictions tied to SGMA. “We need more surface storage,” he said. “We need more floodplains where we can bank groundwater.” The discussion also focused heavily on Delta management and the need to increase pumping capacity while modernizing infrastructure throughout the state. Ring argued that California's current policies prioritize bureaucracy and litigation over practical solutions. “We have to change the regulations,” Ring emphasized repeatedly throughout the interview. One proposed solution involved completing the long-discussed Folsom South Canal extension, which Ring and former Congressman John Duarte believe could significantly improve water movement into the San Joaquin Valley. “Why isn't that canal extended all the way to the Clifton Court Forebay?” Ring asked. The conversation also turned toward SGMA and the difficult balance between groundwater sustainability and maintaining agricultural production. While Ring acknowledged that subsidence damage to aqueducts and canals must be addressed, he argued the state should simultaneously increase surface water deliveries and streamline groundwater recharge projects. “Why aren't we pumping a maximum amount onto any farmer's land willing to recharge groundwater during the winter?” Ring asked. Politics remained front and center throughout the program as hosts Nick Papagni and Josh McGill criticized recent California governor debates for largely ignoring agriculture, food production, and water policy. “Not one question on farming or ag,” hosts said while discussing frustration over the lack of agricultural focus in statewide political discussions. The episode also explored broader concerns involving California energy policy, climate regulations, fuel costs, forestry management, and economic competitiveness as agriculture continues struggling under mounting regulatory pressure. Ring argued that California must return to an “abundance mentality” focused on building infrastructure, reducing unnecessary regulation, and supporting industries like farming, energy, logging, and manufacturing. “We have to unify behind an agenda that's going to demand reform,” Ring said. As California moves closer to the governor primary election, the AgNet News Hour series continues highlighting how water policy may become one of the defining issues shaping the future of agriculture and rural communities statewide. Listen to the full interview below or on your favorite podcast app.

Are Climate Policies & Energy Shifts Part of a Bigger Global Strategy? New Claims Spark Debate

The AgNet News Hour focused heavily on California's growing water crisis and the political battle surrounding agriculture, featuring an extended interview with water policy expert Edward Ring on the future of farming, Delta management, desalination, and the upcoming governor race. Ring, Director of Water and Energy Policy at the California Policy Center, warned that California is approaching a critical turning point where leadership decisions on water infrastructure and regulation could determine the future of agriculture statewide. “It couldn't be any more important,” Ring said while discussing the urgency surrounding California's next governor and the state's long-running water failures. A major focus of the interview centered on the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta and the ongoing debate over water allocations, fish protections, and infrastructure management. Ring argued that California's refusal to dredge portions of the Delta has significantly worsened environmental and water delivery problems over the past several decades. “These habitats are degraded because we can't dredge anymore,” Ring explained. According to Ring, shallow channels throughout the Delta are restricting water flow, harming fish migration, increasing saltwater intrusion, and reducing the ability to move water efficiently to farms and communities. He believes targeted dredging could improve conditions for both agriculture and the environment. “We can make everyone happy,” hosts noted during the discussion, emphasizing that solutions exist if policymakers are willing to act. The conversation also highlighted frustration within agriculture over years of water uncertainty despite several recent wet winters and strong reservoir levels. Ring argued that California continues wasting opportunities to store excess water during high-rainfall years. “They should be figuring out how to get every bit of that excess water somewhere,” he said. Ring outlined several solutions, including expanding groundwater recharge projects, increasing reservoir storage, restoring Delta channels, and modernizing statewide infrastructure. He also pushed strongly for expanded desalination projects along the California coast. “There's a lot of potential for desalination and we're not thinking big enough,” Ring said. He explained that large-scale desalination could eventually help Southern California become more self-sufficient while easing pressure on the Colorado River system and creating more flexibility for agriculture. The interview also turned political as Ring discussed the California governor race and concerns about future leadership on water and energy policy. He warned that California's regulatory system has become increasingly difficult to navigate and argued that aggressive reforms are needed to streamline projects and improve efficiency. “We need a governor that's willing to go in there and shake things up,” Ring said. Beyond water, the episode featured practical crop protection discussions with Valent USA field market development manager Todd Burkdahl, who encouraged growers to stay proactive against spider mites, alternaria, brown rot, and other pest pressures as temperatures continue climbing statewide. Burkdahl emphasized the importance of early scouting and preventative applications, particularly in almonds and tree fruit crops heading deeper into summer. As California agriculture faces mounting pressure from regulation, water shortages, rising fuel costs, and political uncertainty, industry leaders continue warning that long-term solutions cannot wait much longer. Listen to the full interview below or on your favorite podcast app.

Clean energy funding under the GGRF remains frozen, with projects on hold and questions over federal spending authority unresolved. --- The $27 billion Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund has become a focal point of the Trump administration’s efforts to roll back federal clean energy policy. The program was designed to finance clean energy and emissions-reducing projects by channeling public funds through nonprofit financial institutions to attract private investment, including investments that support community resilience. After taking office in 2025, the administration moved to freeze funding and sought to terminate grant agreements that had already been awarded, citing concerns about oversight, conflicts of interest, and program design. Supporters argue the funds were lawfully appropriated and that the administration is attempting to unwind commitments based on claims that have not been substantiated in court. Roughly $20 billion of that funding now remains in limbo, with projects on hold. Senator Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island, ranking member of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, discusses how the program was designed to work, the administration’s stated rationale for shutting it down, and what the dispute could mean for clean energy investment and congressional authority over federal spending. Related Content Breaking the Lock on Urban Climate Finance: A Proposal for a Green Cities Guarantee Fund to Support Climate Resilient Infrastructure in Cities https://kleinmanenergy.upenn.edu/research/publications/breaking-the-lock-on-urban-climate-finance-a-proposal-for-a-green-cities-guarantee-fund-to-support-climate-resilient-infrastructure-in-cities/ Governing the Greenhouse Gas Protocol https://kleinmanenergy.upenn.edu/research/publications/governing-the-greenhouse-gas-protocol/ Energy Policy Now is produced by The Kleinman Center for Energy Policy at the University of Pennsylvania. For all things energy policy, visit kleinmanenergy.upenn.eduSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Trump's comments on China spark outrage, but is there a bigger geopolitical strategy behind the scenes? Tara and Lee break down the explosive Trump-Xi summit, the Iran oil chess game, Rubio's warning about nuclear Iran, and why China's grip on Tehran could reshape global power. Plus, the South Carolina Republican civil war erupts as establishment insiders battle Trump-backed redistricting and controversial AG candidate David Pascoe faces intense scrutiny. SHORT CLICKABLE TITLE Trump's China Gamble EXPOSED EPISODE SUMMARY Today's show dives deep into the backlash over President Trump's stunning comments about China, Xi Jinping, Chinese farmland ownership near military bases, and the growing tension over Iran's nuclear ambitions. Tara and Lee argue that while Trump's public praise of China sounds alarming, the real strategy may be economic warfare aimed at cutting Iran and Russia out of China's energy pipeline. The conversation explores claims that China secretly controls key Iranian infrastructure and discusses Marco Rubio's defense of Trump's hardline negotiating tactics. The hosts also examine the possibility that Trump is intentionally reshaping global oil markets to weaken adversaries while forcing China into dependence on American energy exports. In the second half, attention shifts to South Carolina politics, where accusations of a Republican “UniParty” establishment protecting Democrat-aligned candidates ignite a fierce internal battle. The show details controversy surrounding David Pascoe, redistricting fights, Lindsey Graham's influence, and allegations that establishment Republicans are undermining Trump-backed reforms. KEY TOPICS Trump's controversial China comments Xi Jinping and U.S.-China relations Iran nuclear tensions China's influence over Iran Oil politics and global energy markets Marco Rubio defending Trump strategy South Carolina Republican infighting Redistricting battle in South Carolina David Pascoe controversy Lindsey Graham and establishment Republicans SEO KEYWORDS Trump China deal, Trump Xi Jinping interview, Iran nuclear crisis, Marco Rubio Iran comments, China Iran alliance, South Carolina redistricting, David Pascoe controversy, Lindsey Graham criticism, Trump oil strategy, China buying American oil, SC GOP civil war, UniParty South Carolina, Trump energy policy, Iranian nuclear threat, Republican primary South Carolina THUMBNAIL TEXT CHINA GAMBLE? TRUMP'S SECRET STRATEGY SOCIAL MEDIA POST

Today we're joined by Jackson Voss, Senior Government Affairs & Policy Advisor at the Alliance for Affordable Energy. He breaks down how energy systems are shaped, regulated, and experienced by everyday people.In this episode, we explore what the energy landscape looks like in New Orleans and across Louisiana, where climate vulnerability, aging infrastructure, and rising costs all intersect. We talk about what “affordable energy” really means, and what's driving up costs for households. He also explains how regulators and policymakers make decisions and why those processes matter for your bills and reliability.We also touch on the future of energy policy, including climate goals, gaps in the current system, and how communities can stay engaged as we transition to cleaner, more equitable energy.

Alina Voss from NX Atomics stops by the Energy News Beat PodcastThe title “The Math Ain't Mathing: Why America Needs Nuclear Now” was derived from a comment Alina made on the podcast. I was very impressed, and as we talked, she made some great points. I am going to follow up with her company and introduce them to some folks.We need to have more nuclear reactors online tomorrow, and we need real solutions.1. Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) and NX AtomicsThe core focus of the conversation centers on NX Atomics' development of small modular nuclear reactors. Key points include:NX Atomics aims to produce the cheapest SMRs on the market (targeting $20 per megawatt hour vs. $90 for traditional Gen 3 reactors)They're targeting a prototype by 2030 and first-of-a-kind deployment in the early 2030sThe company employs German nuclear engineers with 10-15 years of research backgroundThey're using innovative 3D metal printing technology to manufacture reactor components more efficiently and affordably2. Data Centers and Energy DemandA significant discussion about the explosive growth of data centers and their energy requirements:Data centers are increasingly competing with farmland for space in the MidwestTexas ERCOT has 220 gigawatts of applications for new data center power, but only 54 gigawatts of peak capacityData centers are using eminent domain to acquire land, displacing long-time residentsSMRs and data centers are positioned as complementary solutions (”go together like PB&J”)3. Nuclear Energy's Public Perception and MarketingAlina discusses the challenge of rebranding nuclear energy:Older generations associate nuclear with bombs and warGen X often thinks of disasters (Three Mile Island, Fukushima, Chernobyl)Younger generations, especially men, are more pro-nuclearLiving near a nuclear plant exposes you to less radiation than eating a banana annuallyNuclear plants have high approval ratings among nearby residents4. Energy Policy and SubsidiesCritical examination of current U.S. energy policies:Wind and solar have been artificially inflated by subsidies and can't compete on their own meritsWind turbines last only 8 years; solar panels last ~15 years and 95% end up in landfillsThe farm bill subsidizes ethanol, which is counterproductive (takes more energy to produce than it yields)Ethanol damages vehicles and reduces fuel efficiency by ~4 miles per gallonThe need to reform subsidies to support more sustainable, long-term energy solutions5. Global Energy Competition and ChinaDiscussion of geopolitical energy dynamics:China is rapidly expanding nuclear capacity (50+ reactors with 20+ more planned)The U.S. has 94 reactors and is falling behindIP theft and supply chain vulnerabilities are critical concernsEnergy independence and dominance are central to future global competitivenessSecretary Chris Wright's pro-nuclear stance is seen as crucial for U.S. energy policy6. Transmission Infrastructure and Grid ChallengesThe underlying infrastructure problem:Aging transmission infrastructure is a bottleneck for moving power from generation to demandThis is a bigger issue than just generation capacitySMRs offer distributed generation that can bypass some transmission challenges7. Regenerative Agriculture and Land UseBrief but important discussion about sustainable farming:Current agricultural policies favor monoculture corn production with heavy chemical inputsRegenerative agriculture and sustainable land management are better for both economics and healthThe tension between subsidizing farmland for food vs. for energy productionWe are seeing that Data Centers, AI, Wind, Solar, and Agriculture are more closely aligned than you can imagine. Land and water grabs are ongoing in the U.S., and they are second only to the political corruption we are seeing in our systems.We covered the Levelized Cost of Energy and the importance of its design. I loved the fact that they are 3D printing and getting the system designed faster rather than laterCheck out their website: https://www.nxatomics.com/Connect with Alina on her LinkedIn here: https://www.linkedin.com/in/alinavoss/It would be fun to get Alina and Grace Vanderhei (Stankie), who was on the podcast as a former Miss America and a nuclear engineer, together to discuss the future of nuclear.This week, I reached out to John Rich to get him on the podcast. While it is a long shot, we need all of the air cover we can get to protect our farmers, farmland, and people's homes from the Wild West of Data centers being overrun by eminent domain on people's homes and farms.We need more future leaders and companies like Alina and NX Atomics.Check out the Energy News Beat SubStack https://theenergynewsbeat.substack.com/A shout-out to Steve Reese and the Reese Energy Consulting group for sponsoring the Podcast https://reeseenergyconsulting.com/.Data2 if you have any business systems, can you trust A? Well, they have the patent on validation. . https://data2.zoholandingpage.com/energyAnd we have WellDatabase rolling in as a new sponsor. https://welldatabase.com/

Stay informed on current events, visit www.NaturalNews.com  - Power Cutoff for Nevada Residents Due to Data Centers (0:12) - Impact on Residential Real Estate and Legal Implications (6:03) - Challenges for Liberty Utilities and Alternative Energy Solutions (6:21) - Global Trends and Future Power Shortages (9:32) - The Role of Big Tech and Local Governments (15:19) - The Impact of Climate Cultism on Energy Policy (20:38) - Preparation and Solutions for Energy Shortages (24:49) - The Role of AI in Education and Employment (27:07) - The Future of Work and Entrepreneurship (28:53) - The Importance of Physical Gold and Silver (58:13) - Data Centers and Their Impact on Humanity (1:15:02) - Environmental and Social Concerns of Data Centers (1:18:17) - AI and Military Influence on Data Centers (1:23:29) - Technological Advancements and AI Projections (1:27:50) - AI Weaponization and Ethical Concerns (1:31:32) - China's Leadership in Technology and AI (1:50:18) - Energy and Resource Competition (1:55:28) - Global Economic and Environmental Impact (2:06:48) - Future Predictions and Strategic Outlook (2:11:29) Watch more independent videos at http://www.brighteon.com/channel/hrreport  ▶️ Support our mission by shopping at the Health Ranger Store - https://www.healthrangerstore.com ▶️ Check out exclusive deals and special offers at https://rangerdeals.com ▶️ Sign up for our newsletter to stay informed: https://www.naturalnews.com/Readerregistration.html Watch more exclusive videos here:

Wind and solar resources are providing more clean, low-cost electricity to the grid than ever before, but the intermittent nature of renewable generation requires careful planning. In the latest episode of the Power Trends podcast, NYISO Director of Grid Transition Udayan Nair breaks down what the latest data reveals about wind and solar performance, and what it means for reliability in New York as electricity demand continues to grow.Notably, the electric grid has seen remarkable growth in behind-the-meter solar capacity in recent years, surpassing the solar goal in the state's Climate Leadership Community Protection Act (CLCPA).“We had a goal in CLCPA to reach 6000 megawatts by 2025,” Nair said. “We were at over 6,800 megawatts of capacity last year and it's grown by about 1,000 megawatts per year since 2020. That's a remarkable success in terms of the capacity that has been added to the grid.”Front-of-the-meter solar, which refers to grid-connected solar installments that participate in the NYISO's energy markets, has also seen increased capacity in recent years. While no new wind installments were added in 2025, existing units performed better than usual due to stronger wind patterns, Nair said. Nair discussed factors that contribute to renewable performance, including seasonal weather, demand patterns, and curtailments. He explained why solar and wind must be paired with transmission, storage, and flexible resources to keep the grid reliable, particularly during summer heat waves and winter cold snaps. The latest renewables data showcases the growing contribution of renewables in the current fuel mix and underscores the need for an all-of-the-above approach to development as New York's electric system continues to evolve. More resources: View the 2025 Renewables Report.Learn MoreFollow us on X/Twitter @NewYorkISO, LinkedIn @NYISO, Bluesky @nyiso.comRead our blogs and watch our videos

On today's AmperWave Daily, the hosts unpack a controversial claim making waves online and in political commentary: that major climate institutions have allegedly revised or scaled back long-standing worst-case climate scenarios. The discussion expands into media influence, political messaging, energy policy history, and how climate science has been used in public debate for decades. Note: This episode reflects commentary and claims made in the source transcript.

Tara breaks down why critics say the climate agenda is unraveling after new IPCC scenario revisions and growing political backlash. HOOK For decades, catastrophic climate predictions shaped energy policy, education, media coverage, and the global economy. Now critics claim the very institutions that promoted those warnings are quietly backing away from their most extreme scenarios — and Tara says the implications are enormous. DESCRIPTION A stunning debate erupts after new revisions from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change spark claims that the most catastrophic warming scenarios were never realistic to begin with. Tara argues the climate movement's “worst-case” predictions fueled massive economic damage, soaring energy costs, manufacturing decline, censorship campaigns, and fear-driven politics for years. The episode dives into how climate models influenced American energy policy under President Barack Obama, why critics say coal and manufacturing were deliberately gutted, and how media outlets are now shifting their messaging. Tara also revisits past predictions from Al Gore and questions how long climate change narratives will remain embedded in schools, politics, and public policy. KEY TOPICS IPCC revisions to extreme climate scenarios Debate over catastrophic climate predictions Energy policy and rising electricity costs Coal industry decline in America Manufacturing movement to China and India Climate change education in schools Media coverage and censorship allegations Political fallout from climate policy debates SEGMENTS SEGMENT 1 — “The Climate Narrative Shock” Tara opens with claims that the climate movement's most catastrophic predictions are quietly being abandoned. The discussion centers on recent IPCC scenario revisions and why critics view them as a major turning point in the climate debate. SEGMENT 2 — “The Cost of the Agenda” The episode explores how climate policy allegedly reshaped the American economy through energy regulations, rising electricity prices, and restrictions on coal production. Tara argues these policies accelerated the decline of U.S. manufacturing. SEGMENT 3 — “Media, Schools, and Fear” Attention turns to how climate change messaging spread through media coverage, education systems, and public institutions. Tara criticizes climate-focused curriculum in schools and argues generations were taught to fear environmental catastrophe. SEGMENT 4 — “The Political Reckoning” The show closes with discussion about changing political messaging around climate change and whether media organizations and Democratic leaders are beginning to retreat from earlier alarmist rhetoric. QUOTE OF THE DAY “It was their first big society-wide hoax.” SOCIAL MEDIA TEASER

The United States is celebrating roughly a decade of transforming the shale revolution into a global LNG export powerhouse. But as geopolitical tensions rise and electricity demand surges from AI and data centers, new questions are emerging about America's long-term energy strategy.In this new Energy Vista episode, Leslie Palti-Guzman sits down with former Congressman Charles Boustany to discuss the extraordinary transformation of Louisiana and the United States into a dominant force in global energy markets.The conversation explores how the US became a net exporter of oil and gas, whether America's energy abundance strengthens its geopolitical leverage, and how policymakers should think about energy planning in an era of growing power demand, industrial competition, and global instability.The conversation also explores the importance of historical perspective in energy and geopolitics. Charles reflects on his long-standing passion for history and his decision to pursue a PhD in the field.This is an insightful exchange at the intersection of energy, industrial policy, geopolitics, and American competitiveness.

Oil prices continue to climb as a result of the Iran war. We discuss how that has interfered with President Trump's planned energy policy. Plus, will the Republican presidential ticket have Vice President JD Vance or Secretary of State Marco Rubio at the top in 2028?This episode: political correspondent Ashley Lopez, business correspondent Camila Domonoske, and White House correspondents Danielle Kurtzleben and Franco Ordoñez.This podcast was produced by Casey Morell and Bria Suggs, and edited by Rachel Baye.Our executive producer is Muthoni Muturi.Listen to every episode of the NPR Politics Podcast sponsor-free, unlock access to bonus episodes with more from the NPR Politics team, and support public media when you sign up for The NPR Politics Podcast+ at plus.npr.org/politics.See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for sponsorship and to manage your podcast sponsorship preferences.NPR Privacy Policy

Climate Panic Collapse: New York Energy War, IPCC Walk-Back & the ‘Doomsday' Reversal

You will NOT want to miss this episode of the Energy News Beat Global Oil and Gas Markets Update with our special guest Doomberg. We were live on LinkedIn and YouTube, and we had some great questions.We highly recommend subscribing to Doomberg's Substack at: https://newsletter.doomberg.com/1. Geopolitical Conflict & War ResolutionThe primary focus is on the potential end of the Middle East conflict (referred to as "World War III"). Doomberg argues that multiple signals suggest the war is concluding, including:An aircraft carrier leaving the GulfTrump's planned visit to BeijingGold trading patterns showing inverse correlation with war escalationDiplomatic activity (Iranian Foreign Minister visiting Oman, St. Petersburg, and Beijing)Market behavior suggesting peace is being priced in2. Global Energy Markets & Oil PricingExtensive discussion about oil market dynamics:Oil price projections (ranging from $50-$100+ per barrel)The impact of the conflict on global oil supplyStrategic Petroleum Reserve refilling strategyCalifornia's diesel crisis and energy independence issuesThe role of OPEC and its members (particularly UAE's exit)3. Global Realignment & New Trading BlocsThe emergence of new geopolitical alliances based on energy policies:A potential new world order with the US, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, UAE, India, China, and RussiaThe contrast between energy-friendly nations and "net zero" countries (EU, UK, Canada)The UAE's positioning as closer to Israel/US interestsIran's strengthened regional position4. UK Political PredictionsA bold prediction that Ed Miliband will become Prime Minister, based on:Current Labour Party vulnerabilitiesScandals affecting other potential successorsThe contrast between energy-knowledgeable leaders (like Liz Truss) being removed from powerMiliband as the "cleanest dirty shirt" in London politics5. Energy Policy & DeindustrializationCriticism of net-zero policies in Western nations:UK banning North Sea drilling while Norway increases productionEU energy policies creating dependencyWindfall profit taxes discouraging energy productionCalifornia's refinery closures creating fuel shortages6. Currency & Financial System ChangesDiscussion of potential shifts in global monetary systems:Possibility of Russia and China backing currencies with goldThe weaponization of the US dollar through sanctionsChina's blocking statute against US sanctionsThe end of the post-WWII order7. Personal Preparedness & Energy SecurityPractical discussion about:Home energy independence (solar, batteries, propane generators)Preparedness for grid outagesThe importance of self-sufficiencyCommunity resilience8. Media & MisinformationCommentary on:Fake Doomberg accounts on social mediaMainstream media coverage vs. open-source intelligenceThe role of Substack in bypassing traditional media gatekeepingPodcast listener metrics and platform independenceThe conversation weaves these topics together to paint a picture of a world transitioning from a US-dominated unipolar order to a multipolar system where energy policy and geopolitical alignment will be central to global power dynamics.Check out the Energy News Beat SubStack https://theenergynewsbeat.substack.com/A shout-out to Steve Reese and the Reese Energy Consulting group for sponsoring the Podcast https://reeseenergyconsulting.com/.Data2 if you have any business systems, can you trust A? Well, they have the patent on validation. . https://data2.zoholandingpage.com/energyAnd we have WellDatabase rolling in as a new sponsor. https://welldatabase.com/

La guerra nel Golfo sta accelerando un possibile cambio di paradigma nel mercato energetico globale. La scorsa settimana gli Emirati Arabi Uniti hanno annunciato l’uscita dall’Opec: secondo diversi analisti Abu Dhabi punta ad avere maggiore libertà nel promuovere come nuovi benchmark internazionali del greggio le varietà del Golfo - Dubai, Murban e Oman - alternative al Brent del Mare del Nord. Un cambiamento che potrebbe avere implicazioni geopolitiche enormi, perché questi contratti potrebbero essere scambiati anche in yuan cinesi o rupie indiane, riducendo il ruolo del dollaro nel commercio globale del petrolio. L’Arabia Saudita osserva senza ostacolare il processo, mentre negli Emirati cresce anche il dibattito sulla presenza delle basi militari americane. Sul fronte americano, intanto, aumentano le pressioni politiche interne: il caro carburanti negli Stati Uniti corre molto più che in Europa e diventa un tema sensibile in vista delle elezioni di midterm di novembre. Donald Trump potrebbe intervenire limitando o sospendendo temporaneamente l’export di greggio Usa attraverso i poteri straordinari previsti dall’Energy Policy and Conservation Act in caso di emergenza nazionale. I mercati iniziano già a scommettere su questa ipotesi: aumentano infatti le posizioni finanziarie che prevedono un forte allargamento dello spread tra Wti e Brent nei prossimi mesi. Il commento è di Salvatore Carollo, Analista del mercato energetico e Trader di Oil&Gas. Ex-dirigente trading Eni.Scuola, monta la protesta contro la riforma dei tecnici. Ma le imprese non trovano lavoratori qualificatiCresce la protesta contro la riforma degli istituti tecnici voluta dal governo Meloni. Domani 7 maggio sindacati come Flc Cgil, Cobas, Usb e Cub hanno proclamato uno sciopero nazionale della scuola contro una riforma che, secondo i promotori della mobilitazione, trasformerebbe l’istruzione tecnica in un percorso troppo orientato alle esigenze immediate delle imprese. Docenti, studenti e personale scolastico contestano soprattutto la riduzione del peso delle materie formative generali - come italiano, geografia e lingue - a favore delle discipline professionalizzanti, oltre al maggiore ingresso delle aziende nel percorso scolastico. La Rete nazionale degli istituti tecnici parla di una riforma calata dall’alto senza confronto con il mondo della scuola, mentre una petizione online ha già raccolto oltre 33mila adesioni. Il ministro Valditara difende invece il progetto sostenendo che serve a modernizzare la scuola e ad avvicinare la formazione al mercato del lavoro. Sullo sfondo resta però il problema strutturale delle imprese italiane, che continuano a non trovare personale qualificato: secondo Unioncamere quasi il 45% delle posizioni aperte ad aprile è risultato difficile da coprire, con criticità particolarmente forti nei settori della meccanica, dell’edilizia, del tessile e dell’ingegneria. Facciamo il punto con Riccardo Cuomo, dirigente di Unioncamere dell'area politiche del lavoro e progetti istituzionali per la semplificazione e con Claudio Tucci, Il Sole 24 Ore.

4pm - GUEST - KEN PETERSON - WRITER AND DIRECTOR OF “WHAT DOES IT COST” // Documentary Exposes the Staggering Costs of Net Zero Energy Policies // GUEST - RY CURLEY // Recapping the “historic” Kentucky Derby // The Mariners retire #51… Again

The Greenhouse Gas Protocol, the global standard for corporate emissions accounting, is increasingly embedded in policy, drawing new scrutiny of its governance. --- The Greenhouse Gas Protocol is the global standard for how companies measure and report their greenhouse gas emissions. It is used by most large companies worldwide and increasingly underpins climate disclosure requirements in places like the European Union and California. Originally developed outside of government, the Protocol filled a gap at a time when policymakers had not agreed on how emissions should be measured. But its role has evolved, and what began as a voluntary reporting tool is now becoming embedded in climate policy. As its influence has grown, so has scrutiny. Questions about how emissions are counted have persisted. More recently, attention has turned to how the Protocol itself is governed, including how decisions are made, who has influence, how scientific input is handled, and how transparent the process is. Danny Cullenward, senior fellow at the Kleinman Center and a member of the Greenhouse Gas Protocol’s Independent Standards Board, discusses how the Protocol was developed, how its role has evolved, and the challenges it faces as it takes on a more central role in climate policy. He also examines whether recent governance changes go far enough, and what is at stake as the Protocol continues to shape how emissions are measured and reported. Danny Cullenward is a senior fellow at the Kleinman Center and a member of the Greenhouse Gas Protocol’s Independent Standards Board. Related Content Governing the Greenhouse Gas Protocol https://kleinmanenergy.upenn.edu/research/publications/governing-the-greenhouse-gas-protocol/ Policy Design Issues for Border Carbon Adjustments https://kleinmanenergy.upenn.edu/research/publications/policy-design-issues-for-border-carbon-adjustments/ Energy Policy Now is produced by The Kleinman Center for Energy Policy at the University of Pennsylvania. For all things energy policy, visit kleinmanenergy.upenn.eduSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Welcome to The Times of Israel's Daily Briefing, your 20-minute audio update on what's happening in Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish world. Environmental reporter Sue Surkes joins host Gabriella Jacobs for today's episode. We open the episode with a recent annual national monitoring report, carried out on behalf of the Energy and Environmental Protection ministries, on the state of the Mediterranean Sea. Surkes describes how the sea is growing saltier, warmer and more polluted, and why it has become a home to invasive tropical fish. We discuss what that means for beachgoers and fish eaters as we head into the summer season. We then move on to the latest updates in an unusual court case: The Jerusalem District Court on Tuesday ordered the Interior Ministry to grant temporary Israeli status to a Syrian-born woman, the wife of a disabled IDF veteran, who converted to Judaism. The Syrian Alawite woman and her husband have faced a series of legal hurdles as they seek to build a life together in Israel. We hear about their saga. In the second half of the program, Surkes walks through her recent op-ed on Israeli energy policy, which she describes as a growing security risk. We end off the program with an account of her recent visit to the orangutans at the Jerusalem Zoo, who, 10 days ago, welcomed a new baby to their troop. This is not the first orangutan to be born in Israel, but it’s the first at the biblical zoo, and an important addition to the world’s shrinking orangutan population. Check out The Times of Israel's ongoing liveblog for more updates. For further reading: The Mediterranean: Warmer, saltier, more acidic, and rising fast — report After years in limbo, court lets Syrian convert live in Israel with husband, a disabled vet True independence must include the air we breathe Great excitement as first orangutan is born at Jerusalem Biblical Zoo Subscribe to The Times of Israel Daily Briefing on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, YouTube, or wherever you get your podcasts. This episode was produced by Yitzchak Ledee.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Helen Thompson, a political economist at Cambridge, examines how geopolitical conflict has shaped global oil and gas markets, with implications for the current Gulf crisis. --- Geopolitical conflict has long shaped the evolution of global energy systems. Over the past 70 years, periods of relative stability in oil and gas markets have repeatedly given way to disruption, from the Suez Crisis to the oil shocks of the 1970s, and more recently to tensions in the Middle East. These episodes have often prompted governments and markets to rethink how energy is produced, sourced, and used, sometimes reducing vulnerability, and at other times creating new risks that only emerge over time. But these disruptions have not all played out in the same way. Some have triggered significant shifts in how energy systems are organized, while others have had more limited and short-lived effects. In some cases, efforts to manage risk have led to lasting changes. In others, they have introduced new dependencies that only became visible later. On the podcast, Helen Thompson, professor of political economy at the University of Cambridge, explores how major geopolitical disruptions have reshaped energy systems in the United States and globally, and the policy and market responses that have followed. She also examines the vulnerabilities and pressure points in today’s oil and gas markets, and what recent tensions in the Persian Gulf may reveal about the resilience of the current system. Helen Thompson is professor of political economy at the University of Cambridge. Related Content: Policy Design Issues for Border Carbon Adjustments https://kleinmanenergy.upenn.edu/research/publications/policy-design-issues-for-border-carbon-adjustments/ Climate Change and Migration in Central America: Evidence from New Environmental Event Data https://kleinmanenergy.upenn.edu/research/publications/climate-change-and-migration-in-central-america-evidence-from-new-environmental-event-data/ Energy Policy Now is produced by The Kleinman Center for Energy Policy at the University of Pennsylvania. For all things energy policy, visit kleinmanenergy.upenn.edu.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Insurance is on the front lines of climate risk, and may help shape how we respond to it. --- Insurance is one of the quiet pillars of the modern economy. It underpins where we build, how we invest, and whether communities can recover after disaster. In many ways, it defines what risks we’re willing, and able, to live with. But that foundation is under strain. Across the United States, rising losses from wildfires, floods, and other extreme events are driving up insurance costs and pushing insurers out of some markets. In states like California and Florida, homeowners are finding it harder, and more expensive, to secure coverage. When insurance becomes unavailable, the consequences extend beyond individual households, affecting housing markets, local economies, and community stability. Carolyn Kousky, founder of Insurance for Good and a senior fellow at the Kleinman Center for Energy Policy, explores how climate change is reshaping insurance markets and what that means for the future of risk, investment, and resilience. She explains how insurance doesn’t just respond to risk, but can also influence it by shaping investment in resilient infrastructure, guiding development decisions, and affecting the flow of capital into cleaner energy systems. Carolyn Kousky if a senior fellow with the Kleinman Center for Energy Policy and founder of Insurance for Good. Related Content: Measuring What Matters: Rethinking Energy Insecurity Metrics https://kleinmanenergy.upenn.edu/research/publications/measuring-what-matters-rethinking-energy-insecurity-metrics/ Policy Design Issues for Border Carbon Adjustments https://kleinmanenergy.upenn.edu/research/publications/policy-design-issues-for-border-carbon-adjustments/ Energy Policy Now is produced by The Kleinman Center for Energy Policy at the University of Pennsylvania. For all things energy policy, visit kleinmanenergy.upenn.edu.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The League Episode #46 – Show Notes Benoy Thanjan and David Magid break down major shifts reshaping the energy market, from Brookfield's $6.5 billion acquisition of Boralex to NextEra's massive 10 gigawatt natural gas buildout driven by data center demand. They also discuss the surprising $1 billion payment for TotalEnergies to exit offshore wind and what it signals about changing U.S. energy policy. Despite the volatility, solar continues to dominate on pure economics, with Texas setting new generation records as solar and storage become the foundation of the future grid.   Host Bio: Benoy Thanjan Benoy Thanjan is the Founder and CEO of Reneu Energy, solar developer and consulting firm, and a strategic advisor to multiple cleantech startups. Over his career, Benoy has developed over 100 MWs of solar projects across the U.S., helped launch the first residential solar tax equity funds at Tesla, and brokered $45 million in Renewable Energy Credits (“REC”) transactions. Prior to founding Reneu Energy, Benoy was the Environmental Commodities Trader in Tesla's Project Finance Group, where he managed one of the largest environmental commodities portfolios. He originated REC trades and co-developed a monetization and hedging strategy with senior leadership to enter the East Coast market.  As Vice President at Vanguard Energy Partners, Benoy crafted project finance solutions for commercial-scale solar portfolios. His role at Ridgewood Renewable Power, a private equity fund with 125 MWs of U.S. renewable assets, involved evaluating investment opportunities and maximizing returns. He also played a key role in the sale of the firm's renewable portfolio.  Earlier in his career, Benoy worked in Energy Structured Finance at Deloitte & Touche and Financial Advisory Services at Ernst & Young, following an internship on the trading floor at D.E. Shaw & Co., a multi billion dollar hedge fund. Benoy holds an MBA in Finance from Rutgers University and a BS in Finance and Economics from NYU Stern, where he was an Alumni Scholar. Connect with Benoy on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/benoythanjan/ Learn more: https://reneuenergy.com https://www.solarmaverickpodcast.com   Host Bio: David Magid David Magid is a seasoned renewable energy executive with deep expertise in solar development, financing, and operations. He has worked across the clean energy value chain, leading teams that deliver distributed generation and community solar projects. David is widely recognized for his strategic insights on interconnection, market economics, and policy trends shaping the U.S. solar industry. Connect with David on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmagid/  If you have any questions or comments, you can email us at info@reneuenergy.com.

1. Michigan Political Commentary & Dearborn Focus A Michigan Senate candidate avoided discussing the killing of an Iranian Ayatollah due to concern that voters in Dearborn were “sad” about it. This is evidence of Democrats allegedly pandering to Islamist-sympathetic voters rather than condemning terrorism. Dearborn is characterized as politically influential and ideologically radical in this framing. “America-hating Islamists” are gaining influence within Democratic politics. Prominent progressive Democrats (e.g., Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib, AOC) are examples of this alleged trend. Support for or sympathy toward Iran, Hezbollah, or anti-Israel positions is portrayed as electorally strategic rather than principled. 3. Michigan Synagogue Attack Narrative A March synagogue attack in West Bloomfield, Michigan, which the FBI labeled Hezbollah-inspired terrorism. Details emphasized: Targeting of children inside a Jewish temple/school The attacker’s alleged ties to Hezbollah propaganda Failures in immigration vetting and firearm sales checks The incident is a sign of systemic risks posed by insufficient counterterrorism enforcement. Strong criticism is directed at U.S. agencies for allowing a naturalized citizen with alleged terrorist connections to enter and remain in the country. These failures are do to broader Democratic positions on borders, DHS funding, and national security. Vetting lapses are deliberate policy choices rather than administrative failures. 5. Energy Policy and National Security Argument Using a Washington Post editorial as validation, the text criticizes green energy policies in: Germany Taiwan California The central claim: anti-nuclear and fossil fuel policies weaken national resilience during geopolitical crises. Energy independence is presented as a core national security issue, not just an environmental one. 6. ActBlue and Foreign Donor Allegations The New York Times is reporting that ActBlue may have misled Congress about vetting foreign donations. Key claims include: Potential acceptance of illegal foreign contributions Legal warnings from ActBlue’s own law firm Risk of criminal investigation or shutdown This is evidence of foreign interference benefiting Democrats electorally. Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz X: https://x.com/tedcruz X: https://x.com/benfergusonshowYouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruzSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

From birthright citizenship loopholes to foreign birth tourism, America faces a growing national security threat. Legal experts and authors reveal how regimes in China and Iran exploit U.S. laws, potentially creating a future voter base loyal to foreign powers. Meanwhile, the U.S. energy sector becomes a battleground as Trump-era refinery expansions clash with Democratic pushback, affecting the global petrodollar and national independence. ⏱️ Short Summary: Birth tourism loopholes and foreign influence collide with U.S. energy strategy. One million foreign-born U.S. citizens may be raised overseas with allegiance to hostile regimes—while refinery politics dictate America's energy future.

A week of political upheaval exposes who really runs Washington—and it isn't Donald Trump. From midnight deals in Congress defunding ICE and Customs to birthright citizenship loopholes exploited by foreign powers, the threats to America's safety and sovereignty are mounting. Plus, energy independence, state-level tax battles, and political cover-ups reveal how national security and taxpayer dollars hang in the balance. ⏱️ Short Summary: Congressional deals, foreign birth tourism, and border security failures collide, leaving Americans exposed. From unfunded immigration enforcement to state-level tax mismanagement, this episode breaks down how policy choices affect safety, energy, and your wallet.

Today, Washington proves once again who's really in charge—and it's not Donald Trump. From midnight legislative deals that defund ICE and Customs to birthright citizenship loopholes exploited by foreign powers, Americans face unprecedented risks. Energy independence, state tax battles, and political cover-ups add fuel to the fire. This episode cuts through the chaos to reveal the stakes for your safety, your wallet, and the future of our country. ⏱️ Short Summary: Congressional deals defund key border enforcement agencies. Birth tourism loopholes give foreign powers influence. Dangerous criminals roam free. State-level tax battles and political cover-ups expose the failures putting Americans at risk.

1. Michigan Hezbollah‑Inspired Terror Attack An attack on a synagogue and school in West Bloomfield, Michigan, was an act of Hezbollah‑inspired terrorism. The attacker is: A naturalized U.S. citizen with ties to Hezbollah Motivated by Iranian and Hezbollah propaganda Intending mass casualty violence against Jewish children The discussion emphasizes: Failures in immigration vetting Government databases allegedly flagged the individual Criticism of federal agencies for allowing entry and naturalization Media is downplaying or sanitizing extremist motives by using neutral labels like “Michigan Man.” 2. Democratic Party Accused of “Coddling” Radical Islamism Democrats enable or sympathize with radical Islamist movements Anti‑terror enforcement has been weakened through policy choices and funding decisions Department of Homeland Security funding and confirmation votes are cited as proof of institutional neglect. Terrorism is the result of Biden era policy consequences. 3. New York Politics & Mamdani Criticism A New York political figure (Mamdani) is: Opposing U.S. military action against Iran Framing the Iran conflict as morally unjustified and financially wasteful Defending or excusing the Iranian regime Ignoring Iran’s role in killing Americans and sponsoring terrorism This is symptomatic of the radical ideological shift within Democratic politics. 4. Michigan Democratic Senate Candidate & Dearborn Comments A Michigan Senate candidate is criticized for: Avoiding condemnation of Iran or the Ayatollah Citing that people in Dearborn are “sad” about the Ayatollah’s death Leaked or recorded strategy discussions are used to argue the candidate: Prioritizes electoral politics over national security Is willing to deflect using domestic political attacks rather than address terrorism The commentary suggests this reflects electoral influence from Islamist‑sympathetic constituencies. 5. Energy Policy & California “Self‑Inflicted Energy Crisis” The final section shifts to energy security, citing a Washington Post editorial. Green energy policies in Germany, Taiwan, and California weakened energy resilience The Iran conflict exposed dependence on unstable global energy supply chains California is highlighted for: Unique fuel regulations Closure of refineries Dependence on overseas imports Renewable energy is insufficient for baseload reliability. Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz X: https://x.com/tedcruz X: https://x.com/benfergusonshowYouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruzSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Today we greatly enjoyed hosting Dr. Tatiana Mitrova, Global Fellow at the Center on Global Energy Policy, Director of the New Energy Advancement Hub, and Senior Research Fellow at the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. Tatiana is an expert in energy systems, geopolitics, energy markets, and institutional decision-making, with particular emphasis on structural constraints, resilience, and risk. Born in Russia and now based in Cyprus, she brings a valuable perspective to the current turbulence involving Russia, Ukraine, Iran, and the broader global energy system. In our conversation, we explore how the Russia-Ukraine war has evolved into a form of energy warfare, with drone attacks and other strikes increasingly targeting refineries, export terminals, pipelines, and broader energy infrastructure, forcing Russia's energy sector to shift from traditional energy security toward physical asset defense. We cover the interaction between the Ukraine war and the Iran conflict, particularly how higher oil prices, tighter global supply, and diverted U.S. attention are giving Russia additional strategic and financial breathing room, even as attacks on infrastructure create export constraints. Tatiana explains that the more realistic risk for Russia is not near-term collapse but gradual degradation, as the Kremlin continues to prioritize war spending over civilian welfare and relies on oil revenues, reserves, and social insulation to sustain the system. She also outlines why territorial gains in Ukraine remain essential to Putin's domestic legitimacy, making a negotiated settlement far more difficult. We discuss the likely Russian summer offensive, Ukraine's growing effectiveness in drone warfare, and the increasing vulnerability of Russian energy infrastructure. Tatiana walks through the domestic backdrop inside Russia, including war fatigue without viable opposition, a population shaped by a strong “fortress Russia” narrative, and a growing divide between insulated urban populations and regions bearing the human cost of the war. We touch on Russia's longer-term positioning, including the ongoing pivot of energy exports away from Europe and toward China and India, the pricing and dependency risks embedded in that shift, and why Russia views the Iran conflict opportunistically rather than ideologically. She also explains how she thinks about the broader U.S.-China-Russia power dynamic, in which energy flows remain a central lever. We close by covering the longer-term social and economic consequences of the war inside Russia, including the implications of large-scale mobilization, reintegration challenges for returning soldiers, and the reality that the full costs of this conflict are likely to unfold over a decade or more rather than in the immediate term. For additional reading, Tatiana's article, “Russia's Hormuz Dividend: Revenue, Leverage, and Limits,” is linked here. Another recent article, “How the Iran War Is Changing Europe's Energy Transition,” is linked here. It was an insightful discussion, and we can't thank Tatiana enough for sharing her time and thoughts with us. Mike Bradley started the show by noting that U.S. equity markets were up 1.5% to 2.0% on the day, while the 10-year U.S. government bond yield was modestly lower and global oil prices were higher (Brent up ~$6/bbl and WTI up ~$2/bbl). He highlighted that the Iran war has entered its second month, provided a handful of monthly energy and equity market performance statistics, and noted that there still appears to be a real disconnect in oil markets (“physical” versus “financial/paper”) and between oil markets (up 55% to 65%) and U.S. equity markets (down ~7%).

This roundtable was recorded in Dallas, Texas, on March 11, 2026, at our Dispatch Energy event.Steve Hayes sits down with Jonah Goldberg, Kevin Williamson, and Alex Trembath, the executive director of the Breakthrough Institute and contributor to the Dispatch Energy newsletter, to discuss the war in Iran's effect on oil markets and what Ronald Reagan got right about energy 50 years ago.The Agenda:—Military success vs. policy success—U.S. energy independence—Prolonged oil disruption—Ronald Reagan's 1974 address—The end of the climate hawks—2026 and beyondShow Notes:—Alex's latest for Dispatch Energy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

16. Richard Epstein (Civitas Institute)discusses the Middle East war's threat to niche commodities essential for high-end microchips. He critiques recent energy policies and emphasizes the difficulty of assessing military progress due to limited public information. (16)1900 BRUSSELS

PREVIEW FOR LATER. GUEST: Bud Weinstein. Weinstein discusses the surging demand for electricity and the need for an "all of the above" energy policy. He emphasizes keeping coal plants online alongside natural gas and solar. (4)