Podcasts about hassid

Through great travails, challenges, and opportunities, Mayer Weiss navigated his way to Judaism. His journey is an inspiring story of growth and renewal, from his roots in Mexico to his various stops along the path to a new way of life. Mayer can be reached at: mayernweiss@gmail.com   ____________________________________ Need Financial Planning and Life insurance?   Call Moshe Alpert!   Email: Moshe.alpert@nm.com for a free consultation, or head to Moshealpert.nm.com                                 Or call                          718-644-1594   ____________________________________ Subscribe to our Podcast   Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2WALuE2   Spotify: https://spoti.fi/39bNGnO   Google Podcasts: https://bit.ly/MPPGooglePodcasts   Or wherever Podcasts are available!   Follow us on Instagram: https://instagram.com/meaningfulpeoplepodcast   Like us on Facebook: https://bit.ly/MPPonFB   Follow us on Twitter:https://twitter.com/MeaningfuPplPod   Editor: Sruly Saftlas   Podcast created by: Meaningful Minute   For more info and upcoming news, check out:   https://Meaningfulminute.org

Rabbi Manis Friedman is the most popular Rabbi on YouTube - with over 500,000 subscribers. Rabbi Friedman is a Hassid, rabbi, author, social philosopher and public speaker. He is also the dean of the Bais Chana Institute of Jewish Studies. For the Sake of Argument podcast: YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@jakenewfield Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/4k9DDGJz02ibpUpervM5EY Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/for-the-sake-of-argument/id1567749546 Twitter: https://twitter.com/JakeNewfield --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/jake-newfield/support

En Israël, qu'est ce qui fait d'un homme un homme? Ram Menachem pense que la réponse se trouve dans les films. Dans cet épisode, nous explorons le film "Deux Kuni Lemel", une comédie musicale yiddish qui se déroule dans le contexte de la lutte entre le monde traditionnel du hassidisme yiddish et le nouveau monde de la haskalah, un mouvement ashkénaze des Lumières. Le film raconte les aventures mouvementées de Kuni Lemel, un jeune hassid simple d'esprit, dont l'identité est usurpée par son cousin Max, un homme instruit et charismatique.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this episode we take a look and a deep dive on aliens and conspiracy's about aliens, and also we all learn how to make love to aliens too. We also examined the different types of alien conspiracies and the insanity author and political scientist Ian Write goes deep into his own theories about aliens. Enjoy the weirdness Follow the official Hassid cast ig: @thehassidcast Follow us on Instagram: @terrel.gss @aloosh.gss @pali.gss Join the discord to talk to us and to send us your favorite clips: https://discord.gg/V9GqqYzsrb Enjoy this episode. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thehassid/message

In this episode of the Hassid cast, we spoke with LVCCI, the writer of the well-known AI song "Winter's Cold," about how the song was made and how AI is incorporated into it. We also examined the industry in detail about how we aren't in control and got deep into a serious discussion on the future of the Hassid cast. Follow the official Hassid cast ig: @thehassidcast Follow us on Instagram: @terrel.gss @aloosh.gss @pali.gss Join the discord to talk to us and to send us your favorite clips: https://discord.gg/V9GqqYzsrb Enjoy this episode. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thehassid/message

In this episode of Agents Influence podcast, host Jason Cass is joined by Garrett Droege, Director of Innovation at IMA Financial Group, and Ruben Hassid, Founder of AI Chat.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Graham is joined by fellow coach Jed Hassid from Purple Performance to look ahead to 2023 and discuss what challenges leaders might expect this year and what to plan for. Duration: 22 min 52 secWebsite: www.theexecutivemindset.co.ukEmail: theexecutivemindset@sagegreen.comFollow us:LinkedIn: @TheExecutive MindsetFacebook: @ExecutiveMindsetCoachingTwitter: @TheExecMindSee our website for privacy policy theexecutivemindset.co.uk/privacy-policy

Graham is joined by performance coach Jed Hassid from Purple Performance to review the challenges business leaders have faced in 2022.Duration: 13 min 58 secWebsite: www.theexecutivemindset.co.ukEmail: theexecutivemindset@sagegreen.comFollow us:LinkedIn: @TheExecutive MindsetFacebook: @ExecutiveMindsetCoachingTwitter: @TheExecMindSee our website for privacy policy theexecutivemindset.co.uk/privacy-policy

We get a dopamine rush when we see the social media notification that someone liked our content. We strain ourselves to our very max at our job to chase up proverbial ladders. We destroy small businesses because we want our product within 2 days or less. We throw fits because a coffee shop doesn't have our favorite flavor syrup. It is without question that we live in a “me centered” culture. What happens though when we take ourselves out of the equation and put the focus on others. We go that extra mile for someone. Well, this week on The Malliard Report, Jim welcomes Rabbi Manis Friedman to the show to discuss just such things. Rabbi Manis Friedman is a Hassid rabbi, author, social philosopher, and public speaker. He is also the dean of the Bais Chana Institute of Jewish Studies. Friedman authored Doesn't Anyone Blush Anymore?, which was published in 1990 and is currently in its fourth printing. In 1971, inspired by the teachings of the Lubavitcher Rebbe, Friedman as a shaliach ("emissary") cofounded the Bais Chana Women International, an Institute for Jewish Studies in Minnesota for women with little or no formal Jewish education. Friedman has lectured in cities throughout the US, as well as London, Hong Kong, Cape Town, and Johannesburg in South Africa, Melbourne and Sydney in Australia, and several South and Central American cities. Rabbi Manis is a fantastic speaker and guest. You can find him on YouTube and on his personal site itsgoodtoknow.org. For all things Malliard, head over to malliard.com for merch, past shows, and the live chat every Tuesday 9 P.M. EST. Remember to rate and subscribe through your favorite podcasting app. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Best episode part 2 --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/yousifkader/message

So here we talk about child hood storys n Andrew tate stuff, disclaimers tho we were very intoxicated making this episode --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/yousifkader/message

For this one we really don't know how to describe this cuz like he just shut us up the entire podcast, but like take notes if you're looking to become an entrepreneur he's spitting real sh!t --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/yousifkader/message

In today's episode, Professor Julia Mahoney of the University of Virginia School of Law joins the podcast live from the ALI-CLE Eminent Domain and Land Valuation Litigation conference in Scottsdale to talk about last year's Supreme Court decision in Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid. We discuss how the case fits into the general direction of this Court's decisions, and what may be on the horizon for property rights at the U.S. Supreme Court. Listeners of this podcast are encouraged to check out the Infrastructure Junkies podcast with Dave Arnold and Kristen Bennett, as well as the Eminent Domain and Right of Way Club on Clubhouse with Patrick McCallister and Beth Smith, for more viewpoints and topics concerning condemnation law and proceedings. Please share your thoughts on the show or this episode with me. I'm on Twitter @J_Clint. If you have thoughts about future show guests or ideas for episodes, please let me know.

Does New York’s “rent stabilization” law violate the federal Constitution? The law, which regulates approximately 1 million apartments in New York City, was enacted more than fifty years ago and remains in effect based on an every-three-year declaration of a housing “emergency.” The law does not merely regulate rent levels. It also limits a property owner’s right to determine who uses an apartment, to convert the property to new uses or to replace the existing building with a new structure, and to occupy the property for use by the owner and his or her family.A lawsuit filed in 2019 asserts that the New York law—including 2019 amendments that significantly increased the restrictions on property owners— violates due process and effects both physical and regulatory takings of the property that it regulates. After being dismissed at the District level, the case now moves to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Rent regulation is not just a New York phenomenon. Other cities across the country have enacted, or are considering, rent regulation legislation. Andrew Pincus, lead counsel for the plaintiffs, and Dean Reuter, Federalist Society Senior Vice President and General Counsel, will discuss the constitutional challenge in the context of the Supreme Court’s evolving property rights jurisprudence—including last Term’s decision in Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid. Featuring:Andrew Pincus, Partner, Mayer BrownModerator: Dean Reuter, Senior Vice President and General Counsel, The Federalist Society---To register, click the link above.

The 2021 National Lawyers Convention took place November 11-13, 2021 at the Mayflower Hotel in Washington, DC. The topic of the conference was "Public and Private Power: Preserving Freedom or Preventing Harm?". This panel discussed "Private Power and Eminent Domain."Since the Founding, the extent to which the public power of eminent domain may be used by, or for the benefit of, private parties, has been a subject of intense debate. Time and time again, the U.S. Supreme Court has considered cases testing the Fifth Amendment’s guarantee that "private property [shall not] be taken for public use, without just compensation." U.S. Const., amend. V. Over 15 years ago, in the landmark case of Kelo v. New London, the Court upheld the exercise of eminent domain to transfer private property from private individuals to other private entities. The decision – controversial from the outset – prompted deeper questions about the extent to which the Constitution allows for eminent domain for "public purposes" even where the action advances the economic interests of private parties over others. But how lasting is this precedent? In a recent dissent from the denial of certiorari in Eychaner v. Chicago, three justices voted to revisit Kelo, two of them expressly calling to overrule it. Since Kelo, the U.S. Supreme Court has continued to review eminent domain and other cases, raising significant property rights concerns – often involving complex questions at the intersection of private and public power.Most recently, in the 2020-2021 term, the U.S. Supreme Court heard three cases dealing with the intersection of private and public power in the eminent domain context: Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid, where the Court held that a state regulation allowing union organizers to enter private property constituted a taking requiring just compensation;PennEast Pipeline v. New Jersey, where the Court dealt with the legality of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s (FERC) delegation of eminent domain powers to a private pipeline company; andPakdel v. San Francisco, where the Court continued to reduce procedural hurdles for inverse condemnation claims (expanding upon a prior decision just two years ago in Knick v. Township of Scott). For this panel, a distinguished lineup of speakers will discuss the intersection between public and private power in the eminent domain context. The panel will focus on eminent domain’s history, the implications of originalism for understanding the extent and use of that power, recent Supreme Court rulings on these topics, and the likely subjects and issues for review in future cases, among other things. As part of this discussion, the panel will illuminate the constitutional, legal, economic, and philosophic principles and considerations that help to inform perspectives on this important topic of public versus private power in the realm of property rights.Featuring:Hon. Paul D. Clement, Partner, Kirkland & Ellis LLP; Former Solicitor General, U.S. Department of JusticeProf. Roderick Hills, William T. Comfort, III Professor of Law, New York University School of LawMr. Robert J. McNamara, Senior Attorney, Institute for JusticeMr. Joshua Thompson, Director of Legal Operations, Pacific Legal FoundationModerator: Hon. Jennifer Walker Elrod, U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Our final guest for Season 3 is Nikolas Bowie, assistant professor of law at Harvard Law School and board member of the ACLU of Massachusetts, Lawyers for Civil Rights, the People's Parity Project, and MassVote. In this episode, we dive into two of his recent articles -- “Antidemocracy” and “The Constitutional Right of Self-Government.” We begin by discussing the Court's recent ruling in Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid (2021) and how it ties to Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States (1964). As part of this conversation, we touch on the implications of Cedar Point moving forward, whether the Court is operating as a democratic institution, and how our institutions can move toward isocracy, a system of government where citizens have equal political power. Next, we discuss the Assembly Clause of the First Amendment and how early in the country's founding, activists used their right to assemble to defend their right of self-governance. This history of the Assembly Clause offers new possibilities of interpretation that would lead to a greater protection of self-governance. Our last episode of the season will be an “Ask Me Anything!” You can submit questions for us at our website, DiggingAHolePodcast.com Referenced Readings: Nikolas Bowie, “The Constitutional Right of Self-Government,” Yale Law Journal (2021). Nikolas Bowie, “Antidemocracy,” Harvard Law Review (2021). Nikolas Bowie, “Do We Have to Pay Businesses To Obey the Law?” New York Times (2021).

Takings. Experts discuss the potential demise of the Penn Central four-part test and the difficulty in determining compensation for temporary and episodic access requirements. Participants. Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, UC Berkeley Law School; Michael McConnell, Professor, Stanford Law School; and Hamid Kahn, Education Attorney, Federal Judicial Center.

Takings. Experts discuss the potential demise of the Penn Central four-part test and the difficulty in determining compensation for temporary and episodic access requirements. Participants. Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, UC Berkeley Law School; Michael McConnell, Professor, Stanford Law School; and Hamid Kahn, Education Attorney, Federal Judicial Center.

Agriculture is BIG business in California; More than half the fruits, nuts and vegetables sold in the US come from the Golden State. This summer, the legislature passed AB616, the Agricultural Labor Relations Voting Choice Act, a bill to expand options for organizing agricultural workers. Modeled on the 2016 Voter's Choice Act, the bill sailed through the legislature, despite being labeled a "job killer" by agribusiness interests. To the surprise of many - including bill sponsors the United Farm Workers - Gov. Newsom vetoed the bill on September 22. Undaunted, the UFW immediately rerouted an in-progress march on Sacramento to Napa's French Laundry, a dig at the Governor they had supported against Recall just the week before. The defeat is the second major blow to the UFW this year: In June, the Supreme Court reversed decades of precedent in a ruling in Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid, finding that union organizers have no right of access to the premises of an agricultural employer for the purpose of meeting and talking with employees and soliciting their support. We are joined this episode by Giev Kashkooli, the political and legislative director for the UFW. Kashkooli spoke with John Howard and Tim Foster about these setbacks, and about the UFW's plans for the future. And, as always, we tell you who had the Worst Week in California Pollitics. Show Notes: :40 What was AB616? 5:26 How do the elections work? 8:18 Newsom is usually aligned with Labor; What happened here? 10:04 After the veto 12:38 Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid 14:17 What's in the future for UFW? 19:41 Is AB616 coming back? 20:45 The #WorstWeekCA Want to support the Capitol Weekly Podcast? Make your tax deductible donation here: capitolweekly.net/donations/ Capitol Weekly Podcast theme is "Pickin' My Way" by Eddie Lang "#WorstWeekCA" Beat provided by freebeats.io Produced by White Hot

On June 23rd, 2021 the Supreme Court decided Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid, a case which concerned whether a California regulation granting labor organizations a “right to take access” to an agricultural employer's property to solicit support for unionization constitutes a per se physical taking under the Fifth Amendment. Chief Justice John Roberts authored the 6-3 majority opinion of the Court, holding that California's access regulation constitutes a per se physical taking. Joining me today to discuss this decision in Wen Fa, attorney at the Pacific Legal Foundation.

Cedar Point Nursery v Hassid, (2021), was a United States Supreme Court case involving eminent domain and labor relations. In its decision, the Court held that a regulation made pursuant to the California Agricultural Labor Relations Act that required agricultural employers to allow labor organizers to regularly access their property for the purposes of union recruitment constituted a per se taking under the Fifth Amendment. Consequently, the regulation may not be enforced unless “just compensation” is provided to the employers. Background. In 1975, California's legislature passed the California Agricultural Labor Relations Act to help unions gain access to agriculture workers in the state, which at that time tended to be migratory with the seasons and difficult to contact otherwise. The Act allowed union members, with prior notice to the state's Agricultural Labor Relations Board but without consent of the property owner, to come onto agricultural properties up to three times a day, one hour at a time, up to 120 days during a year, to perform unionization activities. The dispute arises out of a 2015 effort by agricultural union organizers to persuade workers at a Dorris, California strawberry nursery and at a Central Valley fruit packing operation to join a collective bargaining organization. The visit to the northern California farm was conducted under the 1975 Act. The nursery owner sued for a declaratory judgment and an injunction barring future visits by labor organizers, arguing that the regulation results in a physical taking of property and an unreasonable seizure under the U.S. Constitution. Both the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit rejected the request for an injunction and the nurseries and fruit packer's arguments that state authorization of union organizer visits under the state regulation is a taking of property or an unreasonable seizure. The 2-1 opinion by the appeals court was written by Judge Richard Paez and joined by Judge William A Fletcher. Judge Edward Leavy dissented. Judge Sandra Segal Ikuta wrote a dissent from the denial of rehearing en banc that was joined by 7 other judges. The California Supreme Court had previously rejected constitutional attacks on the regulation in 1976. --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/law-school/support

Cedar Point Nursery v Hassid, (2021), was a United States Supreme Court case involving eminent domain and labor relations. In its decision, the Court held that a regulation made pursuant to the California Agricultural Labor Relations Act that required agricultural employers to allow labor organizers to regularly access their property for the purposes of union recruitment constituted a per se taking under the Fifth Amendment. Consequently, the regulation may not be enforced unless “just compensation” is provided to the employers. Background. In 1975, California's legislature passed the California Agricultural Labor Relations Act to help unions gain access to agriculture workers in the state, which at that time tended to be migratory with the seasons and difficult to contact otherwise. The Act allowed union members, with prior notice to the state's Agricultural Labor Relations Board but without consent of the property owner, to come onto agricultural properties up to three times a day, one hour at a time, up to 120 days during a year, to perform unionization activities. The dispute arises out of a 2015 effort by agricultural union organizers to persuade workers at a Dorris, California strawberry nursery and at a Central Valley fruit packing operation to join a collective bargaining organization. The visit to the northern California farm was conducted under the 1975 Act. The nursery owner sued for a declaratory judgment and an injunction barring future visits by labor organizers, arguing that the regulation results in a physical taking of property and an unreasonable seizure under the U.S. Constitution. Both the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit rejected the request for an injunction and the nurseries and fruit packer's arguments that state authorization of union organizer visits under the state regulation is a taking of property or an unreasonable seizure. The 2-1 opinion by the appeals court was written by Judge Richard Paez and joined by Judge William A Fletcher. Judge Edward Leavy dissented. Judge Sandra Segal Ikuta wrote a dissent from the denial of rehearing en banc that was joined by 7 other judges. The California Supreme Court had previously rejected constitutional attacks on the regulation in 1976. --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app

In this episode, I discuss the Supreme Court's labor and employment law cases for the 2020-2021 term. Among the cases discussed are Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid, which concerned access for unions to agricultural employers in California. The Court found that granting unions access for up to 3 hours per day for 120 days per year was a taking and the employers should have been compensated. I discuss what this means for other union cases in the future. The episode also discusses California v. Texas, which concerns the Affordable Care Act; Henry Schein Inc. v. Archer and White Sales Inc., which deals with the enforceability of arbitration agreements; Fulton v. City of Philadelphia, which demonstrates the Court's willingness to enforce religious rights and religious liberty; National Collegiate Athletic Association v. Alston, where the court held that the NCAA's prohibition on education related benefits (e.g., scholarships) for college athletes violates antitrust laws and questioned the other compensation structures in college athletics; Tanzin v. Tanvir, another case where the court upheld religious liberty; TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez, a case concerning standing for class members in a class action; and Van Buren v. United States, which concerns individuals that exceed their access privileges on computers and will have implications for employers that try to protect their trade secrets.  You can read more about the cases on my blog at https://texaslaborlawblog.com/supreme-court-2020-2021-labor-and-employment-term-roundup/.As always, nothing in this podcast is legal advice. 

La Slovénie assure jusqu'en décembre la présidence tournante de l'Union européenne. À sa tête, Janez Janša, un Premier ministre proche du Hongrois Orban, accusé de dérive autoritaire, d'attaques contre la presse, qui électrise la société slovène à coup de tweets vengeurs. Un Premier ministre à l'image d'une Slovénie, qui malgré une certaine europhilie, voit poindre depuis une dizaine d'années un sentiment anti-européen, comme le souligne Laurent Hassid, dans « Une géopolitique de la Slovénie », publié aux éditions La route de la soie. Laurent Hassid, docteur en géographie et chercheur associé au laboratoire Pléiade de l'Université Sorbonne Paris-Nord s'entretient avec Sylvie Noël.

We are commanded to love G-d. But how to do we go about that? The story of chassidic singer Avraham Fried and Aviv Geffen sheds some light. We also read the most well known verse in the Torah, Hear O Israel, the L-rd our G-d, the L-rd is one. Yet at the end of Aleinu, we say that "on that day", when Mashiach comes, G-d will be one. Because until Mashiach comes, there are people worshipping other "gods". Only on that day will G-d be the undisputed One. Turns out that every time we say Shema, we're being reminded of the reality that will pervade in the times of Mashiach.  

Earlier this year I wrote A Taking, or Not A Taking, that is the Question about the oral arguments in the case of Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid. The Supreme Court has rendered its opinion, so now is the time for a review. If you've read many of my case...

Bonjour à tous et bienvenue pour ce nouvel épisode de « C'est encore loin ? ». Pour les nouveaux venus, bienvenue et pour nos fidèles auditeurs, merci pour votre écoute. L'épisode d'aujourd'hui sera le dernier de la saison 1 mais rassurez-vous, nous continuerons à vous diffuser des formats spécial été durant tout le mois d'août, avant de reprendre de plus belle dès septembre pour une saison 2 qui s'annonce explosive.   Aujourd'hui, nous partons pour un épisode un peu spécial, qui change de nos aventures habituelles, mais quand Laurent nous a raconté son récit, nous n'avons pas pu résister. Nous espérons donc qu'il vous plaira !   Si c'est le cas, aidez-nous à faire grandir le podcast en en parlant autour de vous, en le partageant sur Instagram et en nous laissant un commentaire ou une note de 5 étoiles sur Itunes ou ApplePodcast. Ca prend deux minutes et c'est hyper important pour nous mais aussi pour vous, car c'est ainsi que nous avons des invités toujours plus exceptionnels à vous présenter.   Dans tous les cas, mille mercis et bonne écoute !  --- Jeu concours Pour vous gâter un peu pendant l'été, nous vous proposons de gagner un enregistrement de l'aventure de votre choix, montée en musique et diffusée parmi nos podcasts.   Pour jouer rien de plus simple : envoyez-nous d'ici la fin de l'été un bref enregistrement audio de 3 minutes maximum racontant une aventure de votre été.   Mais attention, pas besoin d'avoir fait le tour du monde à cloche-pied ou la traversée de l'océan indien à la nage pour participer ! Nous recherchons surtout une aventure humaine, originale et inspirante à raconter, même si elle se passe à 100m de votre porte d'entrée ! Bien entendu, la qualité audio de votre enregistrement doit être suffisante pour qu'on vous comprenne mais ne sera pas un critère pour vous départager. Vous pouvez nous envoyer votre extrait par mail : cestencoreloin.podcast@gmail.com ou via notre compte instagram .  Bonne chance à tous ! --- Nous connaître : Avant de vous laisser partir pour une incroyable aventure, je vous rappelle que toutes les photos, les cartes et les informations sur ce voyage sont disponibles sur notre  compte Instagram @cestencoreloin.podcast.  Je vous rappelle aussi que nous avons besoin de vous pour faire grandir ce podcast et avoir grâce à cela des invités toujours plus incroyables à vous proposer.   Pour cela, vous pouvez nous laisser 5 étoiles sur Apple podcast ou Itunes, en parler autour de vous et le partager sur Instagram !   Ca prend deux minutes et c'est très important pour nous.     --- Notes et références :  Pendant l'épisode, Laurent mentionne l'atlas géopolitique des espaces maritimes d'Ortolland et Pilat.   Nous en profitons également pour vous redonner ici le lien vers le site de Laurent Hassid et le lien vers son dernier ouvrage, Une géopolitique de la Slovénie, disponible ici.  

Take it!!  This week's episode covers Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid, in which the Supreme Court struck down a California law that allowed access to union organizers on private property.  Brett and Nazim discuss the implications of the 6-3 ideological split, but also shellfish and roller coasters.  Law starts at (07:30).

Hey everyone! Once again, I'm joined by Jordin Dickerson (@Jordin_Aterria), professor at UNCP in PoliSci, holder of a history and law degree, and current public defender, and we're talking about the "Takings clause" of the Fifth Amendment and some important cases that have shaped the US in the last 20 years or so. While not TOO old as far as history goes, it's still vitally important. I hope you enjoy the episode!

The Supreme Court's term ended on July 1, 2021. Attorney Stuart Gerson discusses two main cases from the term with labor and employment implications, Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid and TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez. He also discusses the Court's interest in ERISA, including a case in which the Court granted certiorari that employers may wish to track in the next term.   Visit our site for this week's Other Highlights and links: https://www.ebglaw.com/eltw217. Subscribe to #WorkforceWednesday - https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe/. Visit http://www.EmploymentLawThisWeek.com. The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments.  Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments.  These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

In this episode Dan and Pat welcome back Wen Fa of the Pacific Legal Foundation to discuss the SCOTUS decision in Cedar Point v. Hassid. We discussed the oral argument in this case on Episode 18 of the show and we thank Wen for coming back to discuss the decision. The decision is linked here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/20-107_ihdj.pdf --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app

The Supreme Court issued its decision in Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid on June 23, 2021, holding 6-3 that a California regulation allowing California union organizers entry onto the private property of California growers constituted an uncompensated per se physical taking in violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. The Ninth Circuit's decision upholding the regulation was reversed and the case was remanded.In this episode, attorney Wen Fa analyzes the decision and its implications.Featuring:- Wen Fa, Attorney, Pacific Legal FoundationVisit our website – www.RegProject.org – to learn more, view all of our content, and connect with us on social media.

Cedar Point Nursery vs. Hassid is a Supreme Court case that determines if property owners can be forced to let union bosses into their businesses to negotiate with their employees against them? Ilya Shapiro from the CATO Institute returns to guide us through the analysis. Special thanks to our sponsor Nota.

Cedar Point Nursery vs. Hassid is a Supreme Court case that determines if property owners can be forced to let union bosses into their businesses to negotiate with their employees against them? Ilya Shapiro from the CATO Institute returns to guide us through the analysis.  Special thanks to our sponsor Nota.

Cedar Point Nursery vs. Hassid is a Supreme Court case that determines if property owners be forced to let union bosses into their businesses to negotiate with their employees against them? Ilya Shapiro from the CATO Institute returns to guide us through the analysis. Special thanks to our sponsor Nota.

You know what's exactly the same? When the government kicks you out of your house so it can build a military base, and when a union organizer gives a farm worker a pamphlet. Or at least that's what the majority of justices on the Supreme Court think, based on the ruling in Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid.We want to know what you think about 5-4 - give us your feedback on this survey!To get premium Patreon-only episodes, access to exclusive events, and membership in the 5-4 Slack, sign up for our Patreon at www.patreon.com/fivefourpod. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Attorney Wen Fa making arguments in the Cedar Point Nursery vs. Hassid Supreme Court case.

SCOTUS Protects Property Rights Against Union Organizers In a big property rights win, SCOTUS reversed the Ninth Circuit decision in Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid and ruled in favor of the right to protect private property against intrusion by union organizers. The majority opinion was written by Chief Justice Roberts where he specified that California's access regulation "grants labor organizations a right to invade the growers' property. It therefore constitutes a per se physical taking" without compensation.  Justices Defend Nonprofits from State-Sponsored Cancel Culture SCOTUS also recognized the blatant abuse of administrative power by a series of California attorneys-general in Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Bonta—the sixth amicus win for NCLA this term. Chief Justice Roberts held that the California Attorney General's donor-disclosure policy for nonprofits—which began under Kamala Harris and continued under Xavier Becerra—is facially unconstitutional because it burdens donors' First Amendment Rights and is not narrowly tailored to an important government interest. Read more about the case here: https://nclalegal.org/amicus-briefs-americans-for-prosperity-foundation-v-robert-bonta-attorney-general-of-california/ See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Professor Josh Blackman of the South Texas College of Law joins us for Episode 69 of the podcast to discuss the Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid case recently released by the U.S. Supreme Court.  Here is a link to the case:  https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/20-107_ihdj.pdf

Sam hosts Mark Joseph Stern, staff writer at Slate covering law and the courts, joins Sam to discuss the biggest cases of the recent Supreme Court term, and the implications of the rulings on cases like TransUnion v. Ramirez and Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid. They start with a discussion on SCOTUS' ruling against Union Organizing on California Farms, deciding that businesses must be compensated for any union leader setting foot on their property, and how the laws struck down stem from Caesar Chaves' union organizing in the 60s and 70s attempting to give migrant workers the possibility of banding together. Mark and Sam look into how the current conservative court is taking on the responsibility of determining what is and isn't considered harm, and, unsurprisingly, seem to be much more concerned with what could be a burden on private property and enterprise than what could be considered harming individuals or workers. In particular, they explore how the Roberts court is tossing the concept of judicial restraint to the side in favor of allowing businesses the freedom to use our information as they please (as long as it doesn't go too wrong), and ensuring states have the right to kick people out of their houses. They also touch on how American political discourse ignores the responsibility of the court's decisions when it comes to their real-world repercussions, and look forwards to the last few impending cases of this term. Sam rounds out the first half by reflecting on the legacy of one Donald Rumsfeld and how hundreds of thousands of civilian lives could still be around had this moment come around a couple of decades earlier. And in the Fun Half: Matt, Matt, Brendan, and Brandon run the show, starting the testosterone-led half of the show off with some Hulk Hogan talk, and Dave from Scranton calls in to chat culture war on the online web of the Right. Then, Chris from MI centers the opioid epidemic in a discussion on the neoliberal culture in healthcare and the crew chats NYC mayoral mayhem before moving on to the behind the scenes debacles at “free speech” social media platforms Gab and Parler that caused their relationships to the Trumps to fall through. They field calls from Finn and Mark, covering some fun Crowder factoids and the best way to sell medicare for all to a conservative, and then Matt and Brandon deep dive into the continued chaos unfolding from the Jan 6th insurrection. Plus, your calls and IMs!   Become a member at JoinTheMajorityReport.com Join the Majority Report Discord! http://majoritydiscord.com/ Get all your MR merch at our store https://shop.majorityreportradio.com/ (Merch issues and concerns can be addressed here: majorityreportstore@mirrorimage.com) You can now watch the livestream on Twitch Check out today's sponsor: BetterHelp gives you access to your own fully licensed and accredited therapist via phone, chat, or video. A lot of therapists elsewhere have long waitlists and it can take weeks or months before they can see you… But when you sign up with BetterHelp, they match you with a therapist based on your specific needs, and you'll be communicating with them in less than 24 hours. BetterHelp is giving our audience 10% off their first month when you go to https://betterhelp.com/majorityreport Support the St. Vincent Nurses today as they continue to strike for a fair contract! https://action.massnurses.org/we-stand-with-st-vincents-nurses/ Subscribe to Discourse Blog, a newsletter and website for progressive essays and related fun partly run by AM Quickie writer Jack Crosbie. https://discourseblog.com/ Subscribe to AM Quickie writer Corey Pein's podcast News from Nowhere, at https://www.patreon.com/newsfromnowhere Check out The Letterhack's upcoming Kickstarter project for his new graphic novel! https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/milagrocomic/milagro-heroe-de-las-calles Check out Matt Binder's YouTube channel! Check out The Nomiki Show live at 3 pm ET on YouTube at patreon.com/thenomikishow Check out Matt's podcast, Literary Hangover, at Patreon.com/LiteraryHangover, or on iTunes. Check out Jamie's podcast, The Antifada, at patreon.com/theantifada, on iTunes, or at twitch.tv/theantifada (streaming every Monday, Wednesday, Thursday and Friday at 7pm ET!) Follow the Majority Report crew on Twitter: @SamSeder @EmmaVigeland @MattBinder @MattLech @BF1nn

If you've listened to this show long enough, you know that it is seemingly impossible to be dishonest and corrupt enough for the Bar to do something about it. Well, Rudy Giuliani found a way. The NY bar has slapped him down in a way that our esteemed Andrew Torrez has never seen before. Also, we've got an update on how Christian Healthshare Ministries are STILL a scam. Then, we talk about Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid, in which the Court badly mangles eminent domain. Having just heard our deep dive in episode 500, you'll be able to spot how terrible this decision is as well! And, Andrew was right on Mahanoy v. BL!

The Supreme Court issued its decision in Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid today, June 23, 2021, holding 6-3 that a California regulation allowing California union organizers entry onto the private property of California growers constituted an uncompensated per se physical taking in violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. The Ninth Circuit’s decision upholding the regulation was reversed and the case was remanded. Featuring:Wen Fa, Attorney, Pacific Legal Foundation ---Dial 888-752-3232 to access the call.

We've got a lot more first rate Supreme Court analysis for you in today's pod. David and Sarah break down the most recent cert grant announcements and the court's refusal to hear some contentious cases involving interstate conflict, transgender bathroom access, and marijuana. They then dive into the Supreme Court's opinion in Lombardo v. City of St. Louis, which asked a lower court to reevaluate whether police used excessive force in kneeling on the back of a handcuffed suspect who later died. Also, Sarah gives her thoughts on Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid, a property law dispute involving union recruiting that divided the Supreme Court along even ideological lines. Finally, David and Sarah discuss a heated confrontation at the 5th Circuit about a case involving police officers who tased a person soaked in gasoline and set him on fire.   Show Notes: -Thomas statement on federal marijuana laws -John Lombardo v. City of St. Louis, Missouri -Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid -5th Circuit ruling on police incineration -5th Circuit ruling on en banc petition (and Justice Willett's dissent) See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Kate and Leah recap four opinions: Lange v. California; Mahanoy Area School District v. BL; Collins v. Yellen; and Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid.

Dr. Grace Hassid joins Jaxon Talks Everybody this week. Grace and Jaxon are family. Dr. Hassid is the lead Infection Control Officer at San Mateo Medical Center. Grace and Jaxon discuss Covid-19 and everything that comes with that topic.  Intro music by Residual Audio (Residualaudio.com) Edited by Ben Rogerson (@BenRogerson_) (Recorded on March 22nd 2021)

Neste primeiro episódio bônus do Afinidades Eletivas, Juliana de Albuquerque conversa com o Professor Michel Gherman sobre antissemitismo estrutural. _ Michel Gherman é coordenador de pesquisa do NIEJ (Núcleo Interdisciplinar de Estudo Judaico) no Instituto de História da UFRJ e pesquisador convidado do Núcleo de Estudos de Judaísmo da USP e coordenador acadêmico do Instituto Brasil-Israel. _ Ficha técnica: Entrevistado: Michel Gherman Edição: Juliana de Albuquerque Música de abertura: Baião Hassid, Banda 3Rios (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rSseV_HRiSk) Logotipo Afinidades Eletivas: Andrea Camargo O Afinidades Eletivas é um projeto de Juliana de Albuquerque, Thiago Blumenthal, Eduardo Cesar Maia, Cristhiano Aguiar e Tarcísio Feliciano e Souza. Acompanhe o podcast Afinidades Eletivas no Twitter (/aeletivas), no Instagram (/afinidades.eletivas) e no Medium (/afinidadeseletivas).

On March 22, 2021 the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid. The question before the Court was whether the uncompensated appropriation of an easement that is limited in time effects a per se physical taking under the Fifth Amendment.Wen Fa, attorney at the Pacific Legal Foundation, joins us today to discuss this case's oral argument.

Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid is currently before the Supreme Court, and it's a case about upholding the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution and protecting property owner's rights. We speak to Mike Fahner, owner of Cedar Point Nursery, about challenging California's "union access regulation" and protecting the Fifth Amendment. ⭕️ Subscribe for updates : http://bit.ly/CrossroadsYT ⭕️ Donate to support our work: https://www.bestgift.tv/crossroads ⭕️ Join Patreon to Support Crossroads: https://www.patreon.com/Crossroads_Josh

In Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid, the Supreme Court will decide whether a California "Access Regulation" violates the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment. The Access Regulation allows union organizers to enter the private property of agricultural employers in the state for three hours per day, 120 days per year, for the purposes of soliciting employees to join the union.Petitioners Cedar Point Nursery and Fowler Packing Company, Inc., are California agricultural employers subject to the Access Regulation. In 2015, union organizers came onto the property of Cedar Point Nursery, a strawberry plant harvester near the Oregon border. The same year, union organizers filed an unfair labor practices charge against Fowler Packing, a citrus and table grape grower, alleging that Fowler denied access to union organizers seeking to enter their property. Petitioners contend that the Access Regulation constitutes a per se taking by appropriating an easement for the benefit of third party union organizers. Petitioners add that, because there is no mechanism for providing just compensation to Petitioners, the Access Regulation violates the Takings Clause.Respondents are members of the Agricultural Labor Relations Board. They argue that per se taking analysis is inappropriate because of time, place, and manner limitations contained in the Access Regulation. They urge the Court to analyze the Access Regulation under the multi-factor balancing test invoked in cases involving regulatory takings.In 1979, a divided California Supreme Court rejected a takings claim brought by other California growers shortly after the Access Regulation went into effect. Petitioners in this case brought this case in federal court. A divided Ninth Circuit affirmed a district court's decision rejecting Petitioners' Fifth Amendment claim, and Petitioners' petition for rehearing en banc was denied over the dissent of eight judges. The Supreme Court accepted the case in November 2020, and heard oral arguments on March 22, 2021.Featuring: - Wen Fa, Attorney, Pacific Legal FoundationVisit our website – www.RegProject.org – to learn more, view all of our content, and connect with us on social media.

It has been a busy month for the Supreme Court, with no slowing down in sight. SCOTUSblog’s media editor, Katie Barlow, turns the mic around on host Amy Howe to get the latest. The pair discuss the court’s recent oral arguments in Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid, a dispute pitting property rights against union organizing, and a hot-button 4th Amendment issue in Caniglia v. Strom. They also talk about the court’s major 4th Amendment decision in Torres v. Madrid and preview what’s coming up, including the perfectly timed NCAA v. Alston. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the uncompensated appropriation of an easement that is limited in time effects a per se physical taking under the Fifth Amendment.

En juin 2020, nous rencontrions Hagit Hassid-Kerbel, co-fondatrice du Festival Musica Mundi, ainsi que de l'école Musica Mundi. A l'occasion d'un grand concert de Musique de Chambre de ses étudiants, vendredi prochain, 2 avril, à 19h30, nous vous proposons une nouvelle diffusion de cet entretien. Hagit Hassid-Kerbel est pianiste. En 1999, elle créait avec le violoniste Leonid Kerbel, son époux, le Festival Musica Mundi A leur arrivée en Belgique, Hagit et Leonid Kerbel (ndlr. : respectivement Israëlienne et Russe) constatent que les structures d'enseignement musical de haut niveau manquent pour leurs élèves les plus brillants et les plus passionnés, ceux pour qui la musique est davantage qu'un loisir. On parle ici de ces jeunes gens qui ne sont pas encore en âge d'intégrer le Conservatoire, et qui doivent suivre la filière de l'enseignement général. En 1999, forts de ce constat, Hagit Hassid-Kerbel et son époux décident dès lors d'organiser un stage d'été de haut niveau pour des jeunes musiciens de 10 à 20 ans. Rapidement, ils convainquent de très grandes figures mondiales de la Musique de Chambre de les rejoindre : le violoncelliste Mischa Maisky sera ainsi le tout premier guide, et le premier soutien de l'aventure Musica Mundi. Concomitamment à ce constat, Hagit et Leonid décident d'organiser un Festival conjointement à ce stage : Musica Mundi était né ! 22 ans plus tard, le Festival Musica Mundi rassemble chaque été les plus grands noms de la Musique de Chambre : de Vadim Repin, au quatuor Prazak, en passant par le regretté Paul Badura Skoda, les King's Singers, Dietrisch Henschel, Rudolf Buchbinder, Ivry Gitlis, Lily et Mischa Maisky , Maxime Vengerov, Ronald Van Spaendonck, et tant d'autres... Le Maître-mot du Festival et de son stage est sans aucun doute celui d' "émulation". Il consiste à faire vivre ensemble des jeunes musiciens du monde entier pendant 10 jours. De jeunes artistes qui ont l'occasion de fréquenter de grands Maîtres pendant tout le stage, dont certains sont parfois leurs idoles. Cours particuliers, stages d'Orchestre, et pour les plus brillants et chevronnés d'entre eux, la possibilité de se produire sur scène, pendant les concerts du Festival : un rêve éveillé pour certains. En septembre 2018, Hagit et Leonid Kerbel franchissaient un pas de plus, et concrétisaient un projet qui germait depuis la création du stage Musica Mundi : celui de créer une école : la Musica Mundi school. Une école répondant à l'enseignement "Cambridge", c'est à dire qu'elle dispense actuellement à 35 jeunes du monde entier, des humanités générales d'une part, et un enseignement musical de haut niveau, d'autre part. La philosophie, les désirs du stage Musica Mundi sont ici inchangés : offrir simultanément un enseignement général et un enseignement musical d'excellence, à des jeunes de 12 à 18 ans. Les cours sont dispensés en anglais, et le modèle "Cambridge" permet aux jeunes d'être les détenteurs d'un diplôme d'humanités en bonne et due forme. "Notre envie", nous confiera Hagit Kerbel, "c'est de ne pas compartimenter d'un côté les cours généraux, et de l'autre, la Musique". Dans cette école, les loisirs et le travail se confondent joyeusement, de 7h du matin, jusqu'à 22h. L'école Musica Mundi est installée dans le Domaine de Fichermont, à Waterloo, un Monastère désacralisé. Les cours sont donnés en anglais, et si tous les grands noms du Festival ne peuvent être aux côtés de ces jeunes tout au long de l'année, certains d'entre eux comme Mischa Maisky et Maxime Vengerov, leur rendent visite plusieurs fois par an. L'équipe pédagogique est fournie : on y retrouve quelques grands noms, comme le pianiste Jacques Rouvier, la harpiste Catherine Michel, ou bien encore le clarinettiste belge Ronald Van Spaendonck. Outre l'écrin de verdure dans lequel se niche l'ancien Monastère, l'école peut s'enorgueillir de posséder une splendide salle de concert, qui était autrefois la Chapelle des...

Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid and Harper v. IRS Vec discusses the oral argument heard before the Supreme Court in the case Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid. Cedar Point Nursery and Fowler Packing Company are California growers that produce fruit for millions of Americans. Collectively, they employ around 3,000 Californians. In 2015, the United Farm Workers (UFW) viewed the workers as ripe for the picking and sent union organizers to storm the workplaces during harvest time to encourage them to unionize. Even though property owners have a right to exclude trespassers, the state's Union Access Regulation takes an easement that allows these union organizers to enter a business's private property three hours a day, 120 days a year. The businesses are asking the U.S. Supreme Court to invalidate California's unlawful regulation and affirm that government can't allow unions to invade private property and disrupt commercial operations without paying compensation for a property taking. Later, Mark discusses the dismissal of James Harper v. Charles P. Rettig, et al by the U.S. District Court for the District of New Hampshire. The district court's flawed decision would ensure that no matter how many constitutional rights the IRS violates, Americans may not hold the agency accountable. NCLA represents James Harper in the lawsuit against IRS for violating his Fourth and Fifth Amendment constitutional rights by issuing a demand for his financial records from a third party without reasonable suspicion—let alone probable cause—that he violated any law. Read more about the case here: https://nclalegal.org/2021/03/district-court-ruling-would-permit-irs-to-violate-constitutional-rights-with-impunity/   DOT's Withdrawal of Due Process Rights Later in the episode, Mark discusses the Department of Transportation's withdrawal of due process rights. The U.S. Department of Transportation has begun the process of undoing a set of Trump-era regulations. The DOT under Secretary Elaine Chao, following the policies Trump laid out in a series of executive orders, had imposed new restrictions on guidance documents, such as legal reviews and cost estimates. The new Transportation Secretary, Pete Buttigieg, moved Wednesday (March 24) to undo key deregulatory actions taken by the Trump administration.  See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Dahlia Lithwick is joined by Adam Cohen to talk about Supreme Inequality: The Supreme Court’s Fifty-Year Battle for a More Unjust America, and whether Merrick Garland should heed calls to reinvestigate Justice Brett Kavanaugh.  In our Slate Plus segment, Mark Joseph Stern on Cedar Point Nursery v Hassid, the big union case before the court this week, guns at the 9th Circuit, and Georgia’s vote-suppression legislation push.  Sign up for Slate Plus now to listen and support our show. Podcast production by Sara Burningham. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Dahlia Lithwick is joined by Adam Cohen to talk about Supreme Inequality: The Supreme Court’s Fifty-Year Battle for a More Unjust America, and whether Merrick Garland should heed calls to reinvestigate Justice Brett Kavanaugh.  In our Slate Plus segment, Mark Joseph Stern on Cedar Point Nursery v Hassid, the big union case before the court this week, guns at the 9th Circuit, and Georgia’s vote-suppression legislation push.  Sign up for Slate Plus now to listen and support our show. Podcast production by Sara Burningham. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

On March 23, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid. Broadly, the case pits the rights of unions to communicate with workers versus the rights of business owners to keep other organizers off of their property, and whether owners must be compensated as a result of any “taking” of that property that occurs. More specifically, the case asks whether California’s Agricultural Labor Relations Act, which requires that union organizers be granted access to speak to agricultural employees on worksites—which are largely private property—at specific times. Cedar Point Nursery alleges that requiring access for organizers on its property amounted to a taking without compensation in violation of the Fifth Amendment. Hugh Baran and Robert McNamara joined Jeffrey Rosen to explain both sides of the case. McNamara, a senior staff attorney at Institute for Justice, filed an amicus brief in support of Cedar Point Nursery while Hugh Baran, staff attorney and Skadden Fellow at National Employment Law project, filed an amicus brief in support of the chair of the Agricultural Labor Relations Board, Victoria Hassid.  A term that will be helpful to know for this week: “Taking”: The Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution says: “Nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.” A taking is when the government seizes private property for public use. Typically, a “just compensation” is determined by an appraisal of the property’s fair market value. Additional resources and transcript available at constitutioncenter.org/interactive-constitution/media-library. Questions or comments about the show? Email us at podcast@constitutioncenter.org.

On March 23, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid. Broadly, the case pits the rights of unions to communicate with workers versus the rights of business owners to keep other organizers off of their property, and whether owners must be compensated as a result of any “taking” of that property that occurs. More specifically, the case asks whether California’s Agricultural Labor Relations Act, which requires that union organizers be granted access to speak to agricultural employees on worksites—which are largely private property—at specific times. Cedar Point Nursery alleges that requiring access for organizers on its property amounted to a taking without compensation in violation of the Fifth Amendment. Hugh Baran and Robert McNamara joined Jeffrey Rosen to explain both sides of the case. McNamara, a senior staff attorney at Institute for Justice, filed an amicus brief in support of Cedar Point Nursery while Hugh Baran, staff attorney and Skadden Fellow at National Employment Law project, filed an amicus brief in support of the chair of the Agricultural Labor Relations Board, Victoria Hassid.  A term that will be helpful to know for this week: “Taking”: The Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution says: “Nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.” A taking is when the government seizes private property for public use. Typically, a “just compensation” is determined by an appraisal of the property’s fair market value. Additional resources and transcript available at constitutioncenter.org/interactive-constitution/media-library. Questions or comments about the show? Email us at podcast@constitutioncenter.org.

On Episode 18 of the Podium and Panel Podcast and Dan and I are joined by Wen Fa of the Pacific Legal Foundation to discuss Cedar Point v. Hassid argued this week before the Supreme Court of the United States by one of his colleagues. The link to the Federalist Society teleforum is here: https://fedsoc.org/events/courthouse-steps-oral-argument-cedar-point-nursery-v-hassid The oral argument before SCOTUS is here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/audio/2020/20-107 --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app

On today’s pod, Sarah and David give us an update on the goings on at the Supreme Court, with an in-depth look at a union takings case out West. “A California regulation allows union representatives to meet with farm workers at their work sites for up to three hours a day for as many as 120 days a year,” Sarah explains. “And so the question is: Is this a per se taking under the Fifth Amendment?” After Sarah and David discuss oral arguments for the case, they do a deep dive on a 9th Circuit Second Amendment case, Twitter’s lawsuit against Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, and a Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court case on the ministerial exception. They wrap things up with some much needed Netflix recommendations and a conversation about D.C. statehood.   Show Notes: -Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid and Supreme Court oral arguments. -New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. Corlett and Holloway v. Garland. -Twitter, Inc. v. Ken Paxton. -Deweese-Boyd v. Gordon College. -Torres v. Madrid. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid, the Supreme Court will decide whether a California “Access Regulation” violates the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment. The Access Regulation allows union organizers to enter the private property of agricultural employers in the state for three hours per day, 120 days per year, for the purposes of soliciting employees to join the union. Petitioners Cedar Point Nursery and Fowler Packing Company, Inc., are California agricultural employers subject to the Access Regulation. In 2015, union organizers came onto the property of Cedar Point Nursery, a strawberry plant harvester near the Oregon border. The same year, union organizers filed an unfair labor practices charge against Fowler Packing, a citrus and table grape grower, alleging that Fowler denied access to union organizers seeking to enter their property. Petitioners contend that the Access Regulation constitutes a per se taking by appropriating an easement for the benefit of third party union organizers. Petitioners add that, because there is no mechanism for providing just compensation to Petitioners, the Access Regulation violates the Takings Clause.Respondents are members of the Agricultural Labor Relations Board. They argue that per se taking analysis is inappropriate because of time, place, and manner limitations contained in the Access Regulation. They urge the Court to analyze the Access Regulation under the multi-factor balancing test invoked in cases involving regulatory takings.In 1979, a divided California Supreme Court rejected a takings claim brought by other California growers shortly after the Access Regulation went into effect. Petitioners in this case brought this case in federal court. A divided Ninth Circuit affirmed a district court’s decision rejecting Petitioners’ Fifth Amendment claim, and Petitioners’ petition for rehearing en banc was denied over the dissent of eight judges. The Supreme Court accepted the case in November 2020, and will hear oral arguments on March 22, 2021.Featuring:-- Wen Fa, Attorney, Pacific Legal Foundation

Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid | 03/22/21 | Docket #: 20-107

A case in which the Court will decide whether the uncompensated appropriation of an easement that is limited in time constitutes a per se physical taking under the Fifth Amendment.

A case in which the Court held a California regulation granting labor organizations a “right to take access” to an agricultural employer's property to solicit support for unionization constitutes a per se physical taking under the Fifth Amendment?

Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid

Neste episódio da segunda temporada do podcast Afinidades Eletivas, nós conversamos com Eduardo Cesar Maia, professor da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, sobre o futuro da crítica literária. — Eduardo Cesar Maia é professor de Comunicação e Literatura na Universidade Federal de Pernambuco. Ele doutor em Teoria da Literatura pela Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, com estágio doutoral na Universidad de Salamanca (Espanha), e, mestre em Filosofia pela Universidad de Salamanca. Eduardo escreve para a Revista Continente, o Café Colombo e para o Estado da Arte — Revista de Cultura, Artes e Ideias do Estadão. — Ficha técnica: Apresentadores: Juliana de Albuquerque e Thiago Blumenthal Entrevistado: Eduardo Cesar Maia Edição: Tarcísio Feliciano e Souza Música de abertura: Baião Hassid, Banda 3Rios (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rSseV_HRiSk) Logotipo Afinidades Eletivas: Andrea Camargo O Afinidades Eletivas é um projeto de Juliana de Albuquerque, Thiago Blumenthal, Eduardo Cesar Maia, Cristhiano Aguiar e Tarcísio Feliciano e Souza. Acompanhe o podcast Afinidades Eletivas no Twitter (/aeletivas), no Instagram (/afinidades.eletivas) e no Medium (/afinidadeseletivas).

O primeiro episódio da nossa segunda temporada é uma homenagem ao amigo Thiago Blumenthal Z”L, um dos criadores do podcast Afinidades Eletivas. Apresentadores: Juliana de Albuquerque, Eduardo Cesar Maia e Cristhiano Aguiar Depoimentos: Gloria Carneiro do Amaral, Moacir Amancio, Andrea Kogan, Gilberto Morbach, Natalia Portinari, Thais Lancman, Uri Lam, Paula Carvalho, Antônio Xerxenesky, Bruno Ferreira, Vitor Santi, Ludmila Franca-Lipke, João Villaverde, João Montanaro, Juliana Cunha. Edição: Tarcísio Feliciano e Souza Música de abertura: Baião Hassid, Banda 3Rios (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rSseV_HRiSk) Logotipo Afinidades Eletivas: Andrea Camargo ----------- Página do episódio com informações, textos e dicas de leitura: https://bit.ly/3iUMgob ----------- Acompanhe o podcast Afinidades Eletivas no Twitter (/aeletivas), no Instagram (/afinidades.eletivas) e no Medium (/afinidadeseletivas).

Intro --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/yousifkader/message

December 15th, 2020

Pour ce nouvel épisode j'ai le plaisir de recevoir Christine Hassid, ancienne danseuse et chorégraphe de sa compagnie au nom éponyme, la compagnie Christine Hassid Project.  Christine est passionnée par l'art depuis son plus jeune âge et c'est dès ses 5 ans devant le lac des Cygnes qu'elle voudra faire “ça !”. Danseuse puis chorégraphe, elle parcourt le monde entier avant de revenir dans sa ville natale : Bordeaux.  On aborde son parcours; ses combats pour une meilleure reconnaissance de son art et de la place des femmes dans ce milieu; sa nomination aux Masques d'Or à Moscou (équivalent des Molières ou des Oscar) et cette reconnaissance internationale étonnamment peu présente en France.  Un très bon moment partagé avec elle, qui m'a permis de la découvrir et d'en apprendre beaucoup plus sur son métier et ce milieu.  Belle écoute à toutes et à tous ! Crédits : 

This week's amazingly-titled episode discusses the case of Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid, which asks whether a California law that grants labor organizers access to private property violates the Fifth Amendment.  The law kinda starts at (11:00), but actually starts at (13:40), which is indicative of the legal focus in this episode.

On this episode Leon Hassid - Sales Enablement & Training Lead @ SecurityScorecard joins me to share his story! "Assume Nothing" is his foundation so get ready and enjoy Leon's story!YOUR INTENTION MATTERS...because that's the result you'll tend to get! www.everestperformance.com

Wearing a Malbush (garment) in the Reshut Harabim (public domain) is not considerd carrying. The question is how to define a garment. According to the Halacha, "a Malbush for one is a Malbush for all." That is, any garment that is normally worn by a specific group of people will be considered a garment, even if worn by someone else, who would ordinarily not wear such clothing. For example, if shepherds wear sackcloth as their usual garb, then anyone else can also wear it on Shabbat. A contemporary application would be wearing Hasidic garb by a non-Hassid or vice-versa.There is also a question as to whether it is permitted to wear oversized or loose fitting clothing in the public domain. The Halacha clearly established that loose fitting Jewelry is problematic, as it may fall off and be carried. The fact that Rambam explicitly prohibits only the loose-fitting jewelry, can be understood as a leniency with regard to the clothing. In fact, the Shulhan Aruch brings a "Yesh Omrim" (minority opinion) that it is prohibited to wear a loose hat on Shabbat. Again, it can be inferred that the majority opinion permits such a hat as well as other loose fitting clothing.One of the defining characteristics of a garment is that it is meant to protect, cover or warm the body of its wearer. However, "Asuleh Tinuf", a garment or accessory designed to protect another garment being worn is not Halachically defined as a garment and may not be worn. Therefore, the Shulchan Aruch rules that a man may not wear a protective "Kis" (pocket) to protect his garments from being soiled by bodily emissions. Based on this principle, the question arises as to whether it is permissible to wear a raincoat on Shabbat? While one may argue that in the winter, a raincoat also serves to provide warmth, nevertheless, in the summer, its sole purpose it to protect one’s clothes from rain. The Shulchan Aruch rules that as long as the protective gear is worn in the normal manner that people wear a garment, it is permitted. The protective pocket is prohibited because that is not a normal type of clothing. Therefore, it is permitted to wear a raincoat in the public domain, even when it is not raining, and there is no concern that one will remove the raincoat and carry it.SUMMARYA piece of clothing ordinarily worn by one type of person, may be worn in the public domain by someone else who does not usually wear such a garment.It is permitted to wear loose or oversized clothing in the public domain.It is permitted to wear a raincoat in the public domain even when it is not raining.

IL N Y A PAS QUE MOI QUI COMPTE 1 Rappelle toi .. Roch Hodech Av .. seule Hiloula mentionné dans la Torah : celle de Aharon ... demande toi pourquoi? 2 Qu est ce que le Chalom? 3 La trame des frères... Dans la Torah. 4 Comment faire pour cohabiter en paix? 5 Laisse de la place et ne t inquiète pas personne ne prendra ta place ! 6 Aie confiance en D!! Sois un Hassid ,pas un cheval. 7 Place ton attention sur ton Travail et sur ton évolution ... meilleur recette pour diriger la jalousie de façon constructive et non destructive !

"Everboarding" Your Employees for Maximum Impact feat Leon Hassid

Nissim Black has been a gangsta rapper, a gang member, and a faith seeker. But it is his current incarnation that is here to stay: an African American Hasidic Jew who brings sharp beats and hooked-filled rhymes to the masses. Originally performing under the name D. Black, he released two albums, The Cause and Effect (2006) and Ali'yah (2009). He retired in 2011 to focus on his conversion to Orthodox Judaism, but returned in 2012 under his Hebrew name, Nissim, and began writing from a more religious standpoint. In 2013, his debut album, under his Hebrew name, self-titled Nissim. After a long discovery process, both musically and personally, Nissim has finally found his true identity. “All of those journeys—being in a gang, being on the football team was a part of me trying to say, ‘I belong to something greater than myself, I know where, but I belong somewhere,'” he says. "It's almost like trying to find that home."Nissim grew up a Muslim, he practiced Christianity and he now is converted to Judaism with his wife and moved his family to the Holy Land. Nissim is a super talented artist and performer, bringing an authentic, fresh sound to the Jewish music industry. We cover his journey from dealing drugs in the streets of Seattle to building a life and career in Israel. This show has got a lot of legs so please enjoy this episode with Nissim Black. Connect with NissimYouTubeInstagramWebsiteTwitterSpotifyFacebookDon't forget to subscribe to The Great Day PodcastYou can watch the full episode on YouTubeAnd be sure to follow my Instagram page and Facebook page to stay up to date on everything I'm working on.I'm Meir Kay and Have A Great Day! Our GDPR privacy policy was updated on August 8, 2022. Visit acast.com/privacy for more information.

Valentin Lutset is constantly making connections. Between throwing big Jewish gatherings in Berlin to seeing behind and between the text, Valentin (or Velvel as he is known) wants to bring people and ideas together. His whole life is a synthesis---Torah and Music, Russian and Jewish, Modern and Hassid. Come and learn the deepest meanings behind the simplest of ideas, and see the world of Torah in a whole new way.

Shawnna Sumaoang: Hi and welcome to the Sales Enablement PRO podcast. I am Shawnna Sumaoang. Sales enablement is a constantly evolving space, and we’re here to help professionals stay up to date on the latest trends and best practices so they can be more effective in their jobs. Today, I’m excited to have Leon join us from SecurityScorecard. Leon, I’d love for you to just introduce yourself, your title, and your organization to our audience. Leon Hassid: Sure. Thanks for that, Shawnna. First of all, thank you so much for the invitation. It’s a pleasure to be here. So, my name is Leon Hassid and I’ve been working in B2B sales and business development roles for over 15 years now. For the last six months, I’ve been working at SecurityScorecard where I’ve been given the wonderful opportunity, I would say, to bring together two worlds that have been and still are a passion of mine – that’s cybersecurity and sales enablement and training. The latter obviously being the main area of my responsibility. What I do is I basically oversee enablement and training for all client-facing professionals at SecurityScorecard, which includes pre-sales and post-sales, about a hundred people-plus, more or less. SS: Very cool. I love that you are combining two of your passions in one, and I think I can see a lot of synergy between those two areas. In fact, you were recently included in a list of 100 sales enablement best practices. You had been talking about the best way to measure sales enablement’s impact on the bottom line, and that’s by systematically tracking sales velocities. So, why do you think sales velocity is the most important metric for sales enablement? LH: Sure. Happy to give some context. Sales velocity is something that’s worked for me in my career, which is the reason why I call it the most important, but it does depend on the business itself, the industry you are operating in, and a lot of other factors. So, there are definitely other KPIs that one could in fact consider as being the most important, but that’s the one that has worked for me. I think in order to qualify that though, let me just give in my mind what could be a basic definition. Sales velocity is the equation, if you will, that any leader needs to look at to try and capture how fast a business is making money. It looks at how quickly leads are moving and converting through the pipeline. How much value new customers or new logos, if you will, are providing over a given period of time. And it depends on what kind of period you’re looking at. So, in practical terms, if you think about it, the less time it takes for a prospect to move through the pipe right from the beginning all the way to the end, the faster you close more deals. In simple terms, a higher sales velocity means you’re bringing in more revenue in less time, which is a dream world in my mind. So, tracking that over time allows you to benchmark your sales velocity against other teams. Let’s say I’m managing an inside sales team and I want to look at our velocity vis-a-vis a field to team. You are able to compare the performance or the effectiveness, if you will, of individual reps against one another or different regions and also see how changes to the sales process are impacting the business for better or worse. What I’ve also done in the past is you can use it for more accurate forecasting and determine how the sales process you have in place can be optimized for faster sales and higher conversions. The reason why I think is the most important metric is because it allows me to always think in terms of the initiatives of programs that I need to consider that can have a direct impact on the company’s ability to frankly, make money and make money faster. And it’s because it’s based on the KPIs that the business is measuring regularly anyway, and I know we’ll go into that later. It’s easier for people in sales enablement leadership roles to just show their value to their business, on a continuous basis. SS: Absolutely, absolutely. And I think you’re spot on. I think sales velocity is kind of one of those leading indicators, that sales enablement can measure to understand where they can have really significant impact in real-time. To your point, today’s business is just moving at such a more rapid clip than it ever was before. So, how do you go about measuring sales velocity and how do you correlate that as best as possible back to sales enablement efforts specifically? LH: Sure. Happy to do that. There are four factors that affect sales velocity. It’s basically an equation: the number of opportunities that you have in your pipeline, the average deal size or what the SaaS industry may be calling average selling price. So, ASP, your conversion rate, and that’s typically what businesses would call their win rate. And of course, last but not least, how long it takes for a sale to actually close, so the duration of your sales cycle, to calculate sales velocity. There’s really only one formula. You basically multiply your opportunities created in a period by your area’s speed, and then by your close rate, and you divide all of that by your sales cycle, measured over the duration that you’re looking to calculate sales velocity for. So, if you want to do it in days, you should divide by the number of days on the average that it takes for you to close a particular deal. The important point is that these KPIs can be used to calculate velocity over time, hopefully trying to figure out how to optimize any of the elements. And what are the sales enablement program activities that you need to associate with those elements in order to, again, going back to what I mentioned earlier, allow the business to make more money faster. The beautiful thing about these KPIs, ASP, win rate, etc., all of these things are easy to track using CRM data. So, salesforce.com is the technology we’re using. Any other CRM tool would apply here. Those KPIs are things that a chief revenue officer who wants to take a look at anyway, so it’s more about bringing them together to paint a more complete picture around how much money are we really making on a daily basis, or on a quarterly basis? Whatever you’re looking at. So, you asked me about correlation, the way you try, or at least I try to correlate or maybe associate, if you will, sales enablement efforts with the improvement in that number, the sales velocity number. One leader only needs to demonstrate how the program or the things that you are doing is impacting any of the four KPIs. So, let me just give you a quick example. Let’s assume that in Q3 and Q4 of 2020 I want to be able to improve the sales cycle duration and shorten it by 30 days. If you remember these KPIs, this is the denominator in our formula, so a smaller number will actually create a higher velocity. That means that I should be thinking about the things I want to roll out in Q1 and Q2 that will have an impact on that. Maybe that’s a new set of qualification questions that I train my reps on that allow a deal to move faster. Maybe that’s your new certification process around doing a product demo that looks to educate reps and the new way to position it or maybe a negotiation session where you’re coaching reps on how to get access to an economic buyer faster. You execute on those initiatives, and then quite frankly, you kind of have to wait and let the numbers speak for themselves. Here’s the problem and the risk that I faced in the past, and there’s not an easy workaround, but it’s just part of the challenge. The leaders need to always keep in mind that there’s a lot of other uncontrollable variables that are impacting the business. So, a leader should be careful when they use the term correlation because it does not mean causation. A leader that oversees sales enablement programs needs to stay ahead of that by tracking the number diligently for a number of periods. That’s why I recommend looking at it monthly even so that you can start gathering all those data points. But it’s important to understand that things may be happening in the market that you just cannot control. A competitor may be dropping their prices drastically and your reps may be finding it very hard to close deals quickly. Or the product category you operate in all of a sudden is now subject to procurement reviews, so that extends sales cycles. So, you may be aiming for a shorter sale cycle, but things are happening in the market that you have no control over. It may be impacting your ability to show improvement. So, it’s very important to have your talk track and your story and your narrative very, very, crystal-clear and representative of what’s happening in the market before you go to your senior leadership and claim success. SS: Absolutely. Now, I want to return to the notion of having to work with executives and getting buy-in. I want to stay on the topic of sales velocity. How do you partner with other departments? I assume that you’re partnering with the likes of sales operations and others to consistently track sales velocity and other performance metrics. Do you have some practical advice to our audience about how best to go about doing that? LH: Yeah, sure. So, just as you would coach your sales teams to build relationships broad and deep, it’s important for sales enablement to do the same, assess relationships and kind of the internal roles within your organization. This obviously would be sales operations, sales, and marketing, but it could also require relationships with HR, finance, and operations. The broader your relationships within their organizations, the better your chances are of success with the CEO and the senior leadership, especially if you’re part of a startup, let’s say. So, you need to do your homework, but you nailed it. The relationship with sales operations is pivotal for all intents and purposes. They tend to be the guardians of the data we’re looking to capture. All other things being equal, they also tend to own the tech stack that reps should be using so that they can do their job properly. So, the question is, how am I as a leader enabling the reps to do that? But to me, relationships with other departments such as product, customer success, and even HR are huge. Those are constituents that you constantly need to educate and convince that the metrics you’re focusing on – so in this case, sales velocity – is the right one. And those departments have their own agenda, their own initiatives, and ultimately sales needs to know about that and be enabled on it. My advice to your listeners, and this is something I received very early in my career, would be to apply the rules of early consultation. And I know this is not going to be popular. Don’t be afraid of more meetings. Perhaps that’s not what people want to hear, but to me, if you don’t have a regular touchpoint, at least weekly with the leaders in those functions we’ve been talking about, I believe you’re creating unnecessary risk in your sales enablement program. So, one practical tip that has worked for me in any organization I’ve had the pleasure of being part of is 15-minute bi-weekly touchpoints with the key stakeholders. It’s never hurt anyone. Quite the opposite. It’s helped me build rapport and it’s about building those relationships that will allow you to be successful and be able to drive the initiatives you want to drive forward. SS: I think that’s fantastic advice. I think you’re right. I think more meetings can often be a hard thing for organizations to digest, but I do think sales enablement, given its highly cross-functional nature, absolutely does have to have a high degree of cross-department communication going on, especially into executive leadership. So, I’ve got a final question for you, and it’s a little bit of a loaded one, so we might need to take it in two parts. We’ve talked a little bit about alignment, but in sales enablement from my perspective, it’s super important that a lot of what it’s measuring, is able to really closely correlate a lot of it back to tangible business impact. Now, how can sales enablement take that and use it to strengthen the alignment but also gain executive buy-in on some of the sales enablement initiatives or deliverables? I would love to just close on some advice from you on that front. LH: Yeah, for sure. Let me perhaps address the executive buy-in because their alignment is typically what I think a person new to owning the sales enablement program would be mostly interested in. I have five tips that I constantly talk about and think about and I’m happy to share these. So, number one for me, build credibility early. Nothing can better position a new leader for success than a quick win that gets people talking. That could be a suggestion you provided in the context of a deal, or a training you conducted on about sales strategies with some of the newer reps, or a new pitch deck that you created or contributed on that was compelling. Anything that shows impact right from the get-go, you need that before suggesting changes or anything new to that for that matter. Number two for me – and again, this is something that I learned early in my career as an account manager – as a sales enablement leader, you need to have a plan. That’s a given, but to me, it’s not about the plan. It’s about the planning. Regardless of the organization you’re part of, small, medium, or large, it needs to be a consensus-building exercise, even if it takes you a little bit longer. Even if you are a Series C or D startup, you may think you’re over-engineering stuff naturally. You need to bring constituents around the table. You need to be the facilitator of a conversation where you’re collectively deciding what the sales enablement plan needs to be. And this is where, to me, the magic happens. You’ll be able to hear everyone’s goals from senior leadership to the chief revenue officer and so forth. And that has worked for me in my career thus far. Another tip that I would have is act as if. This is something I picked up from a movie, and obviously I’m changing the orientation of it. But what I mean by that is you want to act as if you’re in the shoes of other leaders and think about why they should be listening to you. There’s no better way in my mind to gain that alignment you talked about than trying to associate everything you’re doing with other people’s goals. Let me give you an example. Why would a head of product listen to you if you’re not properly training your reps on the new features? Why would a sales operations leader be willing to partner with you consistently if you’re not supporting the adoption of a new technology that they’ve introduced to their stack? All these things matter, because that’s what people keep in mind. And that’s where you build your brand in people’s perceptions. So, act as if would be definitely something that I would recommend to people listening. And last but not least, own the outcome. So, we talked about this. Be confident in your ability to have direct impact on the bottom line. Using sales velocity to measure your performance kind of gets you that. So, before you even think about what the tactics may be that you want to introduce to the organization, my recommendation is to commit yourself to driving improvement by making it known firm-wide that that’s the basis of your evaluation. Sometimes sales enablement leaders have skin in the game, but I don’t think they do a good enough job letting others know about it. It’s more important that a chief revenue officer or a head of sales in the East region of the U.S. knows that. As a sales enablement leader, I’m impacted – even my compensation – by how well their team does on a revenue basis. I feel that builds credibility. It builds accountability. It just allows you to have a different conversation. SS: Those are some really solid tips. Leon, thank you so much for joining us today. I greatly enjoyed our conversation. LH: Sure thing, Shawnna. Thanks again for the opportunity. SS: To our audience, thanks for listening. For more insights, tips, and expertise from sales enablement leaders, visit salesenablement.pro. If there’s something you’d like to share or a topic you’d like to learn more about, please let us know. We’d love to hear from you.

Is mindfulness just another buzzword, what did the Lubavitcher Rebbe think about meditation, what a Buddhist priest says about Shabbos, and more with special guest Lifestyle Coach Tzvi Kessell! www.letmypeopleeat.com

Dr. Jonathan Hassid is a Professor of Political Science at Iowa State University.https://poseidon01.ssrn.com/delivery.php?ID=063089102008120110089098030087029105032011084085035089120075071100016111125098010066005016043056061048060065068105074068118003019053039035048082095098115096096118015093047033097029092119012067078101096117126096080071096096064089091002125001080096100100&EXT=pdfMusic credit: Kammerton

Dr. Jonathan Hassid is an Assistant Professor in Political Science at Iowa State University. Link to the paper discussed: http://jonathanhassid.com/documents/amplifyingsilence.pdf Listen on Apple Podcasts and YouTube; Music by Kammerton

Rabbi Friedman tackles the tough questions of whether it is okay for us to want to make a lot of money. He believes we should all have very comfortable and affluent lives so that we can ignore it and do good things. It is important to ignore it because it's only a means to an end. If we get too caught up in it, if we become too dependent on it, then it starts to work against us. Getting rich can be very depressing, because generally speaking, when our existence is really comfortable then we desperately need to validate that existence with meaning. Once you're affluent, then you have to ask yourself so my existence is good, now what? Tune into this interview with Yaron Hassid. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

A couple rainy days ago I called an Uberpool to take me to work, I opened up the door, and who was sitting snug as a bug in a rug? A real life curly q Heimish! Now, even though I live with and see them almost every day, it's almost like we are living in two separate universes. They usually seem to look right through me, and almost never smile, nod, wave, or make casual conversation at the post office, grocery store, the M train whenever our paths my cross. I once was sent to live with a Hasidic family when I was 12, it left a vicious mark on my memory. It was like stepping into a time portal into the literal past, no electronics, no books, no color, all business. They had 12 children, I slept in the room with the littlest one was was 3 who had hair to his shoulders and I kept confusing him for a girl which made me super unpopular with the rest of the house especially the Mother who basically took all my clothes the first day and threw them out replacing them with drab cement colored wool numbers that erased any body silhouette and left you looking like a cylinder block. ANYWAY I've been thinking a lot about happiness, community, religion and my own personal relationship with the culture and beliefs on which I was raised. As I continue to force myself to mature, I'm trying to lay to rest my childish anger towards the sadness and judgement I felt coming from my fathers very religious parents who consistently would tell me things like "You'll never understand our sacrifice or the true meaning of family..." and were consistently disgusted by my appearance, clothing, and zest for exploration outside what I felt to be prison like walls Judism erected around sexuality, freedom and choice. I used to argue with her, for hours, about the existence of God. I never believed and because of that, she thought I was a disrespectful spoiled Americanized disgrace. One of the last things she ever told me before erasing me from her will and life (when I was 14) was that I would never understand what love meant. The thing is, I've always been able to feel her blood running through my veins and guiding me through life especially when I was first building my business. She was a Gorgeous brilliant and unstoppable Entrepreneur. The mastermind behind the huge businesses that my family built from scratch out of nothing. She came to Pittsburgh via Poland in the beginning of the 20th century as one of 8 siblings with a couple gold watches and acted like she was a incensed Spanish bull and the whole world was red. While she made me miserable, and deeply envious of my friends who had smiling grandparents who baked cookies and taught them how to ride bikes etc, I always was secretly proud of her calculator brain and razor sharp wit. I hope that if she could see me now she would feel the same for me....but either way, I'm going to try to delve deeper into my history and find some peace within it's mangrove roots. Because regardless, it is who I am, there's no use running from it or yelling at people who believe in it. Going to try to embrace it and move on.

Winner of the 2015 National Jewish Book Award, Contemporary Jewish Life and Practice At fourteen, young Shulem Deen, a Hassid in Boro Park, New York, lost his loving father. How was he to deal with the enormous gap in his life that his father’s early death left? He embraced -and was embraced by – a pious spiritual community, the Skverer Hassidim, who had their own town, New Square, New York. In this discreet town of approximately 12,000, only 30 miles north of New York city, the Skverer Hassidim could control everything, or nearly so. So began Deen’s immersion in the life of the Skverer Hassidim, an Eastern European Hassidic group transplanted to the New World — without change! For a time, Deen’s new life worked. He studied, married, had children—but this thinking, questioning young man soon learned that there was no room for questions that challenged accepted norms of the community. How he navigated the need to be honest with himself with the demands of family he loved makes for a page-turning memoir. This well-written book takes the reader through little-known aspects of a Hassidic community, both its strengths and vulnerabilities. At once a wealth of psychological, sociological, and just plain interesting episodes as Deen grows and matures, All Who Go Do Not Return: A Memoir (Graywolf Press, 2015) rewards the reader with distinctive insights into the ultra-religious world of the Hassidim. Shulem Deen’s popular memoir about his life in an insular Hassidic community breaks new ground, written as it is from a male perspective. Having left New Square, Deen founded and edits Unpious, Voices of the Hassidic Friend, an online journal. He is on the board of Footsteps, an important New York-based group that helps people who choose to transition out of the ultra-Orthodox Jewish world. Shulem writes for The Forward, Tabletmag, and other publications. His memoir has been hailed in newspapers and magazines as diverse as The Wall Street Journal and the Huffington Post. He speaks regularly to audiences in New York, Philadelphia, Washington, DC, and elsewhere about his life and memoir. Read this compelling account of a young man’s immersion in an embracing spiritual community and his struggle to be true to himself and his loved ones. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Winner of the 2015 National Jewish Book Award, Contemporary Jewish Life and Practice At fourteen, young Shulem Deen, a Hassid in Boro Park, New York, lost his loving father. How was he to deal with the enormous gap in his life that his father’s early death left? He embraced -and was embraced by – a pious spiritual community, the Skverer Hassidim, who had their own town, New Square, New York. In this discreet town of approximately 12,000, only 30 miles north of New York city, the Skverer Hassidim could control everything, or nearly so. So began Deen’s immersion in the life of the Skverer Hassidim, an Eastern European Hassidic group transplanted to the New World — without change! For a time, Deen’s new life worked. He studied, married, had children—but this thinking, questioning young man soon learned that there was no room for questions that challenged accepted norms of the community. How he navigated the need to be honest with himself with the demands of family he loved makes for a page-turning memoir. This well-written book takes the reader through little-known aspects of a Hassidic community, both its strengths and vulnerabilities. At once a wealth of psychological, sociological, and just plain interesting episodes as Deen grows and matures, All Who Go Do Not Return: A Memoir (Graywolf Press, 2015) rewards the reader with distinctive insights into the ultra-religious world of the Hassidim. Shulem Deen’s popular memoir about his life in an insular Hassidic community breaks new ground, written as it is from a male perspective. Having left New Square, Deen founded and edits Unpious, Voices of the Hassidic Friend, an online journal. He is on the board of Footsteps, an important New York-based group that helps people who choose to transition out of the ultra-Orthodox Jewish world. Shulem writes for The Forward, Tabletmag, and other publications. His memoir has been hailed in newspapers and magazines as diverse as The Wall Street Journal and the Huffington Post. He speaks regularly to audiences in New York, Philadelphia, Washington, DC, and elsewhere about his life and memoir. Read this compelling account of a young man’s immersion in an embracing spiritual community and his struggle to be true to himself and his loved ones. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Winner of the 2015 National Jewish Book Award, Contemporary Jewish Life and Practice At fourteen, young Shulem Deen, a Hassid in Boro Park, New York, lost his loving father. How was he to deal with the enormous gap in his life that his father’s early death left? He embraced -and was embraced by – a pious spiritual community, the Skverer Hassidim, who had their own town, New Square, New York. In this discreet town of approximately 12,000, only 30 miles north of New York city, the Skverer Hassidim could control everything, or nearly so. So began Deen’s immersion in the life of the Skverer Hassidim, an Eastern European Hassidic group transplanted to the New World — without change! For a time, Deen’s new life worked. He studied, married, had children—but this thinking, questioning young man soon learned that there was no room for questions that challenged accepted norms of the community. How he navigated the need to be honest with himself with the demands of family he loved makes for a page-turning memoir. This well-written book takes the reader through little-known aspects of a Hassidic community, both its strengths and vulnerabilities. At once a wealth of psychological, sociological, and just plain interesting episodes as Deen grows and matures, All Who Go Do Not Return: A Memoir (Graywolf Press, 2015) rewards the reader with distinctive insights into the ultra-religious world of the Hassidim. Shulem Deen’s popular memoir about his life in an insular Hassidic community breaks new ground, written as it is from a male perspective. Having left New Square, Deen founded and edits Unpious, Voices of the Hassidic Friend, an online journal. He is on the board of Footsteps, an important New York-based group that helps people who choose to transition out of the ultra-Orthodox Jewish world. Shulem writes for The Forward, Tabletmag, and other publications. His memoir has been hailed in newspapers and magazines as diverse as The Wall Street Journal and the Huffington Post. He speaks regularly to audiences in New York, Philadelphia, Washington, DC, and elsewhere about his life and memoir. Read this compelling account of a young man’s immersion in an embracing spiritual community and his struggle to be true to himself and his loved ones. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Learn How Nutrition and Functional Neurology Can Help Conditions Such as Memory Loss, Alzheimer's Disease and Parkinson's Disease Kirk Hamilton interviews Dr. Eric Hassid, M.D. founder and medical director of the Institute for Restorative Health. Dr. Hassid received his medical degree from George Washington University; completed his neurology residency with the United States Army; and a rehabilitation neurology fellowship at UCLA. Dr. Hassid has extensive continuing education in the area of Functional Medicine and is board certified in neurology as well as anti-aging and regenerative medicine. Download or Open: