Early packet switching network that was the first to implement the protocol suite TCP/IP
POPULARITY
Das Internet ist zur Selbstverständlichkeit geworden, fest in den Alltag eingewoben. Doch es gab Zeiten, da teilten sich ganze Universitäten einen Internet-Anschluss, bei dem man am Bildschirm mitlesen konnte, wie eine E-Mail ankam. Ein Blick zurück auf die Anfänge des Internets in der Schweiz. 1969 wird in Kalifornien die erste Nachricht über das ARPANET verschickt, den militärischen Vorläufer des Internets. In der Schweiz bekommt das kaum jemand mit. Hier hält die PTT das absolute Monopol auf die Datenübermittlung. Und sie verfolgt einen eigenen Plan: ein vollständig schweizerisches, vom Ausland unabhängiges digitales Fernmeldesystem. Das «Integrierte Fernmeldesystem» IFS verschlingt 14 Jahre Entwicklung und über 200 Millionen Franken. 1983 wird es abgebrochen. Ein nationaler Alleingang ist in einer global vernetzten Welt zum Scheitern verurteilt. Erst jetzt erkennt auch die Politik den Rückstand. 1985 beschliesst der Bundesrat Sondermassnahmen für die Informatik. 15 von 207 Millionen Franken fliessen in ein Hochschulnetz. Eine entscheidende Rolle spielen dabei zwei Männer: ETH-Professor Bernhard Plattner und sein Doktorand Hannes Lubich. Sie verbinden die Schweizer Hochschulen und gründen mit dem Bund die Stiftung Switch. Und sie registrieren am 20. Mai 1987 die Länderdomain «.ch». Niemand in Bern ist zuständig, niemand will sie haben. Also tragen die beiden sie kurzerhand auf ihre eigenen Namen ein, als Notlösung. Ende 1989 sind alle Schweizer Universitäten und das CERN am Netz. Der grosse Schub kommt aber erst Mitte der 90er Jahre, als die Anträge für «.ch»-Adressen sprunghaft zunehmen. Das Erstaunliche daran: Geplant hat das niemand. Während die Schweiz Millionen in ein gescheitertes Staatsprojekt steckt, entsteht das Internet fast nebenbei – als Prototyp, den man wegen seines Erfolgs nicht mehr abschalten kann. ____________________ In dieser Episode zu hören: Bernhard Plattner, emeritierter Professor ETH Zürich Hannes Lubich, Informatiker und Hochschullehrer Urs Eppenberger, erster Mitarbeiter von SWITCH ____________________ Recherche, Produktion und Moderation: Jürg Tschirren ____________________ Literatur: Gugerli, David (2018): Wie die Welt in den Computer kam: Zur Entstehung digitaler Wirklichkeit. S. Fischer Verlage. Zetti, Daniela: Special measures: networking Swiss cantonal and federal universities, in: Bori, Paolo und Zetti, Daniela (2022): Digital Federalism Information, Institutions, Infrastructures (1950–2000), 90-116. ETH Zürich: Die Geschichte der Informatikdienste. https://ethz.ch/staffnet/de/organisation/abteilungen/informatikdienste/historisches.html ____________________ Links: SRF 2 Kontext über das integrierte Fernmeldesystem der PTT: Die vergessenen Anfänge der digitalen Telefonie https://www.srf.ch/audio/kontext/die-vergessenen-anfaenge-der-digitalen-telefonie?partId=bb188950-f53e-4ebc-b1f9-38e8ebeaa8ca SRF Rendez -vous-Serie über Bernhard Plattner: «Selbstgemacht»: Bernhard Plattner, Schweizer Internet-Pionier https://www.srf.ch/audio/rendez-vous/selbstgemacht-bernhard-plattner-schweizer-internet-pionier?partId=6796eddb-6c6c-4019-aa0c-7b10955bbe5f ____________________ Hast du Feedback, Fragen oder Wünsche? Wir freuen uns auf deine Nachricht via geschichte@srf.ch – und wenn du deinen Freund:innen von uns erzählst.
Nos vamos a sumergir en un viaje absolutamente fascinante: la historia del Internet, esa tecnología que terminó cambiando el mundo por completo. Pero esta es una historia colectiva, de confianza y de cooperación entre seres humanos. Lo que comenzó como un sistema experimental de comunicación, hoy es el eje articulador de prácticamente todo lo que hacemos en nuestra vida cotidiana. Y es un recorrido apasionante que hoy encuentra su capítulo más disruptivo en el auge de la Inteligencia Artificial. Por eso, en esta serie nos dedicaremos a explorar esa aventura: primero, el origen y la evolución del Internet en el mundo, y luego, su llegada y desarrollo particular aquí en nuestro país, en Colombia Notas del episodio Este episodio fue traído a ustedes gracias a Pragma Para esta historia consultamos el libro (en inglés) "The Internet Is Not What You Think It Is: A History, a Philosophy, a Warning" de Justin E.H. Smith La historia de las "mujeres computadoras" Arpanet: los comienzos militares de una tecnología que cambió el mundo La accidentada historia del primer mensaje de Internet: "LO" Una "telaraña" que llevó a toda una revolución: la World Wide Web Y una de las historias más curiosas de toda la Internet: la webcam y la cafetera de Cambridge Sigue mis proyectos en otros lugares: YouTube ➔ youtube.com/@DianaUribefm Instagram ➔ instagram.com/dianauribe.fm Facebook ➔ facebook.com/dianauribe.fm Sitio web ➔ dianauribe.fm Twitter ➔ x.com/DianaUribefm LinkedIn ➔ www.linkedin.com/in/diana-uribe Gracias de nuevo a nuestra comunidad de patreon por apoyar la producción de este episodio. Si quieres unirte, visita www.dianauribe.fm/comunidad
In this episode of PING, APNIC Chief Scientist Geoff Huston and I discuss Network Time Protocol or NTP. NTP is one of the older systems we depend on, designed and implemented by Dave Mills who died in 2024. Dave had been working on time synchronisation from the mid 1970s, and cared deeply about synchronising the emerging ARPAnet and the Internet, with the pre-existing worldwide collaborative framework which regulates our sense of time, and how it relates to the world of science, astronomy and civil society. Geoff has been musing about NTP, moves to secure NTP, and the many dependencies in the modern world on the underlying concepts of a coordinated sense of time. This dependency in the modern world on highly synchronised clocks cannot be overstated, it creeps into every sector of daily life from aircraft and space navigation, to finance systems, and event scheduling of all kinds. But our model of time is fundamentally based on the rotation of the earth, and the length of the second, and unfortunately while we now define the length of the second to astonishingly accurate levels, the rotation of the earth isn't as stable as we'd like. our model of time therefore has to make some adjustments To make matters worse, our model of time has been coded over the years to varying models of a start date known as an "epoch", and how we represent time inside the machines, systems and services isn't one unified model any more. It's all coming a bit un-stuck.
In this episode, we dive into DARPA — the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency — the secretive U.S. government research organization behind some of the most transformative technologies in modern history.Created after the Soviet Union launched Sputnik in 1957, DARPA was designed to keep America at the forefront of advanced science and defense innovation. Over the decades, it has played a role in the development of ARPANET (the precursor to the internet), GPS, stealth aircraft, AI research, robotics, autonomous systems, and neural interface technologies.But with its massive budget and highly classified projects, DARPA has also become the focus of major conspiracy theories and unanswered questions.In this episode, we explore DARPA's history, its most influential technologies, and the theories surrounding surveillance programs, AI warfare, mind control research, HAARP, autonomous weapons, and even alleged secret space programs.Is DARPA simply a defense research agency—or something far more powerful operating behind the scenes?#DARPA #Conspiracy #AI #Surveillance #SecretProjects #Podcast #Technologywww.stayskeptical.comWise Wolf Gold: https://www.wolfpack.gold/?ref=jvujkwgsSources: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jcwvgWpPz8GqLxNwpeJM7AHqBJL2O3JWVdE8ggKK7_8/edit?usp=sharing
The internet was built by scientists who wanted to share research. Then surveillance capitalism, social media and Big Tech got involved, and ruined it.From Tim Berners-Lee and the World Wide Web to Cambridge Analytica, Elon Musk buying Twitter, and AI rewriting the rules all over again, this is the full history of the internet: how it began, how it was hijacked, and how to take some of it back. We cover ARPANET, Google's monopoly, Wikipedia, YouTube, the data harvesting scandal that exposed 87 million Facebook users, and the platforms actually paying creators fairly, including Bandcamp, Substack, and Ko-fi.https://www.patreon.com/HistorysGreatestIdiotshttps://www.instagram.com/historysgreatestidiotshttps://buymeacoffee.com/historysgreatestidiotsArtist: Sarah Cheyhttps://www.fiverr.com/sarahchey
The internet was built by scientists who wanted to share research. Then surveillance capitalism, social media and Big Tech got involved, and ruined it.From Tim Berners-Lee and the World Wide Web to Cambridge Analytica, Elon Musk buying Twitter, and AI rewriting the rules all over again, this is the full history of the internet: how it began, how it was hijacked, and how to take some of it back. We cover ARPANET, Google's monopoly, Wikipedia, YouTube, the data harvesting scandal that exposed 87 million Facebook users, and the platforms actually paying creators fairly, including Bandcamp, Substack, and Ko-fi.https://www.patreon.com/HistorysGreatestIdiotshttps://www.instagram.com/historysgreatestidiotshttps://buymeacoffee.com/historysgreatestidiotsArtist: Sarah Cheyhttps://www.fiverr.com/sarahchey
In this episode of ACM ByteCast, our special guest host Scott Hanselman (of The Hanselminutes Podcast) welcomes ACM Fellow Eric Allman, a foundational figure of the early Internet as the developer of Sendmail and its precursor Delivermail (for the original ARPANET) in the late 1970s at UC Berkeley. Sendmail is the mail transfer agent that powered a large portion of global email infrastructure through the formative years of the network and helped shape how messages move across the web. Allman is also an ACM Distinguished Engineer and was inducted into the Internet Hall of Fame in 2014. The conversation explores the origins of Internet email, the messy realities of building software that must operate at planetary scale, and what lessons today's engineers can learn from the systems and design decisions that quietly underpin modern computing. Eric shares his work at UC Berkeley spanning a variety of domains, from user interfaces to neural networks. He and Scott touch on current AI capabilities, including their personal experiments in assistive coding with current models such as Claude, and discuss into the programming languages Python, C#, TypeScript, and JavaScript. Eric also shares candid thoughts on letting go of computing after retirement.
“Anyone that's properly using AI now knows that you tell it what you want, it gives you a plan, carries out the work, and you judge and tweak. You're not a passive victim — you're an active user with outcomes in mind.” — Keith Teare Do we really want a no-hands job from Silicon Valley? That Was the Week newsletter publisher Keith Teare — who thinks all tech innovation results in human progress — thinks we do. No hands, no problem, Keith says. But I'm not sure. Especially given the powers-that-be giving us that no-hands job. Keith welcomes the end of what he calls the “typed” and “touched” computing era — keyboards, mice, touchscreens, and all the manifold ways we have used our hands to interact with computers since the 1980s. That's the outcome, he predicts, of the race to AGI. So far so good. But what happens if our no-hands AI future is controlled by Google, Microsoft, Amazon, and Facebook? This week these four behemoths committed 00 billion to AI infrastructure investment in 2026 alone — 2 percent of all US GDP. These companies are racing to build (and own) the foundational mechanics of AGI. That's always how it's been, Keith says, embracing our no-hands future. I'm less open-armed. What happens if we want our hands to fend off AGI? No, I'm not so keen on a no-hands job from Silicon Valley. Especially one couched in the altruism of human progress. Five Takeaways • The End of the Hand-Driven Computing Era: Andrej Karpathy's observation at Sequoia's AI Ascent: he no longer uses his hands to do his work. He speaks to the computer; the computer acts; he judges and refines. The keyboard, the mouse, the touchscreen — all the hand-driven interfaces that have defined computing since the 1980s are entering their twilight. Karpathy calls it “software 3.0”. Keith, two years ago, wrote an editorial called “eyes, hands, ears, and mouth” about the inclusion of other human attributes beyond hands. That prediction has arrived. • $700 Billion: The CapEx Explosion: A post by @Signal framed the week's numbers: $700 billion in AI infrastructure spending in 2026, equivalent to 2 percent of all US GDP. This kind of spending, the post observes, usually happens via governments or wars. This time, it's four private companies — Microsoft, Amazon, Google, and Meta — racing to build the foundational mechanics of AGI. Meta was punished by Wall Street for overspending; Google was rewarded because its numbers were strong enough to justify it. The same bet, two different verdicts, depending on your quarterly earnings. • Was the Internet Privately Built? The ARPANET Argument: Keith's claim: innovation waves have always been privately financed. The railways, the telephone, the electricity grid, the commercial internet. Andrew's counter: ARPANET was a massive government investment that created the protocols on which the internet runs. Keith's response: ARPANET was a university bulletin board that created the precedent, not the infrastructure. Andrew's response: that's not exactly what ARPANET was. They agree that government research matters. They disagree on how much credit it deserves for what became the commercial internet. • The Revenge of the Idea Guy: Sam Altman's line of the week. In the past, an idea person came up with a concept and then needed expensive engineers to build it. Many ideas never saw the light of day because the engineering cost was prohibitive. Now, anyone can speak an idea into existence. AI builds the plan, executes the work, and you judge and refine. That changes the economics of creativity, advertising, software development, and anything else that used to require specialist execution. The specialist is not dead — but specialists will increasingly use AI to scale themselves, rather than being hired one at a time. • Should Kids Use AI in Schools? A New Yorker piece asks what it would take to get AI out of schools. Keith's view: the premise misunderstands how AI works now. The fear is passive students asking chatbots for answers and having their brains atrophy. The reality is that proper AI use requires active judgment at every step — telling it what you want, refining the plan, evaluating the output. If schools understand that, they embrace AI. If they don't, they produce graduates unequipped for a world in which the idea guy with AI tools now has the power the engineering team used to have. Andrew's prediction: the kids whose parents ban AI will eventually sue them. About the Guest Keith Teare is a British-American entrepreneur, investor, and publisher of the That Was the Week newsletter — a daily curation of the most important stories at the intersection of technology, business, and culture. He is a co-founder of TechCrunch and a long-time interlocutor on Keen On America. References: • That Was the Week newsletter by Keith Teare — this week's editorial: “Hand Job?” • Andrej Karpathy at Sequoia Capital AI Ascent 2026 — the Karpathy interview on Software 3.0 and the end of typed input. • @Signal, “$700 billion on AI infrastructure” — the post that framed the CapEx question. • Jessica Winter, “What Will It Take to Get AI Out of Schools?” The New Yorker, 2026. • Episode 2891: John Steele Gordon on how information technology knitted America together — the ARPANET backstory that feeds directly into this week's argument. About Keen On America Nobody asks more awkward questions than the Anglo-American writer and filmmaker Andrew Keen. In Keen On America, Andrew brings his pointed Transatlantic wit to making sense of the United States — hosting daily interviews about the history and future of this now venerable Republic. With nearly 2,900 episodes since the show launched on TechCrunch in 2010, Keen On America is the most prolific intellectual interview show in the history of podcasting. WebsiteSubstackYouTubeApple PodcastsSpotify Chapters: (00:31) - Keith leads with “Hand Job?” — explaining the headline (03:27) - Karpathy at Sequoia: the end of typed and touched input (04:30) - CapEx: the real story of the week (05:35) - $700 billion — 2% of US GDP on AI infrastructure (06:38) - Was the commercial internet privately built? (07:35) - ARPANET: pathetic bulletin board or foundational infrastructure? (09:08) - Keith and Andrew agree to disagree on government's role (11:00) - Big Tech earnings: Google up, Meta down, and why (17:00) - OpenAI's strategy: the long game
If you're reading this on your phone while avoiding something else, congratulations — you are the product. This episode started as a conversation about No Scroll, an AI tool that promises to filter your social media feed so you only see the good stuff. It turned into something more honest: a reckoning with why these platforms exist, why every fix we try doesn't work, and whether AI tools — including No Scroll, including ChatGPT, including everything we're told will save us — are running the same playbook Facebook ran in 2009. Jason and Jeremy don't have a clean answer. But they have a really good metaphor involving methadone and nicotine patches.Key Moments00:00 — No Scroll reviewed: AI that doom scrolls so you don't have to01:28 — Twitter as a cesspool with gold nuggets: Jason's defense of the tool03:10 — Jeremy's alcoholic analogy: why paying a robot to drink your booze isn't sobriety04:07 — The nicotine patch theory: harm reduction vs. actual behavior change07:01 — Inshidification: the cycle that turns every useful platform into a garbage pile08:32 — Jason's internet history lesson: from ARPANET to walled gardens to AI11:20 — How AI companies are repeating the Facebook model: hook, rely, monetize14:50 — ‘You are the product' — and you're also a sucker for believing it's changed17:16 — Jeremy's prediction: AI is going to make the internet boring and we'll still watch it25:54 — AI productivity paradox: Jeremy is more efficient than ever, companies are flat27:00 — What people actually do with saved time (spoiler: not more work)27:58 — The 10/90 rule: 10% of people do 90% of the work, AI or not
In 1969, UCLA Computer Science Professor Leonard Kleinrock led a team of scientists in a project to get two computers to 'talk' to each other. Lo and behold, the experiment worked. . .and ARPAnet was created, laying the groundwork for the internet. Nearly 60 years later, Kleinrock is a Distinguished Professor Emeritus at UCLA, still teaching - and still creating groundbreaking work, including forays into AI. A wildly endearing, vivacious, witty intellect, meet the man I call "the Vin Scully of Computer Science" - a person that truly belongs on the Los Angeles Mount Rushmore.
Il 14 gennaio 2026, il traffico Telnet globale è crollato del 65% in un'ora. Nessun annuncio, nessun comunicato. Qualcuno ha staccato la spina al primo protocollo applicativo di ARPANET, la rete che poi è diventata internet, e l'ha fatto 6 giorni prima che il mondo sapesse perché.In questo episodio: la storia di Telnet dal 1969, come funziona davvero il protocollo (dalla RFC 854), il bug rimasto nascosto 11 anni, e il mistero del crollo coordinato.Fonti e approfondimenti:- GreyNoise Grimoire: https://www.labs.greynoise.io/grimoire/2026-02-10-telnet-falls-silent/- GreyNoise "f Around and Find Out": https://www.labs.greynoise.io/grimoire/2026-01-22-f-around-and-find-out-18-hours-of-unsolicited-houseguests/- RFC 854: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc854- The Register: https://www.theregister.com/2026/01/22/root_telnet_bug/- The Hacker News: https://thehackernews.com/2026/01/critical-gnu-inetutils-telnetd-flaw.html- TXOne Networks: https://www.txone.com/blog/cve-2026-24061-gnu-inetutils-telnet-exploitation/- Dark Reading: https://www.darkreading.com/threat-intelligence/asia-fumbles-telnet-threat-trafficLa mia app: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.edodusi.coderoutine&hl=it-it00:00 Intro01:31 Cos'è Telnet e come funziona il protocollo06:18 Il bug che dormiva da 11 anni11:32 Il giorno in cui Telnet è morto19:26 Outro#telnet #security #arpanet #protocolli #greynoise
Teknoloji gerçekten garajda mı doğdu, yoksa savaş sanayinin gölgesinde mi büyüdü? Spekülatif'in bu bölümünde Emre Dündar, Silikon Vadisi efsanesini, DARPA fonlarını, ARPANET'in doğuşunu ve teknoloji devlerinin devlet–askeri ekosistemle ilişkisini inceliyor. Dündar, internetin askeri kökenlerinden SpaceX ve Starlink'in savaş stratejilerindeki rolüne, Elon Musk'tan Soğuk Savaş teknolojilerine kadar çarpıcı bağlantılar ortaya koyuyor. “Garajdan çıkan dahi” anlatısının arkasındaki finans, güç ve ekosistem gerçeğini konuşuyor. Bu yayın izleyiciye; teknoloji tarihi, savunma sanayi, yapay zekâ, Silikon Vadisi ve küresel güç ilişkileri üzerine eleştirel bir analiz sunuyor. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
How did a Cold War-era research project transform into the global digital infrastructure we use today? This video dives deep into the archives to trace the evolution of the Internet, beginning with the Advanced Research Projects Agency Network (ARPANET) in 1969.We explore the groundbreaking theories of packet switching developed by Paul Baran and Donald Davies, which allowed data to travel independently across a distributed network rather than relying on a vulnerable central hub. You'll learn about the first node-to-node message sent from UCLA to SRI—the succinct and prophetic "LO"—which famously crashed the system before the full word "LOGIN" could be completed.Key Milestones Covered:• The Transition to TCP/IP: Why January 1, 1983, is considered the "Flag Day" and official birthday of the modern Internet.• The Rise of NSFNET: How the National Science Foundation stepped in to provide a high-speed backbone for academic research, connecting supercomputing centers across the U.S.• The World Wide Web: The revolutionary impact of Tim Berners-Lee at CERN and the release of the Mosaic browser, which brought a graphical interface to the general public.• The Privatization Era: A look at the controversial 1995 decommissioning of the NSFNET backbone and the handoff of control to private commercial providers.We also analyze the implications of privatization, including the emergence of a concentrated backbone industry, the lack of "must-carry" regulations, and the lost opportunity for the government to bake security and societal values into the Internet's fundamental design.Featured Pioneers: Vinton Cerf and Robert Kahn (Co-creators of TCP/IP), J.C.R. Licklider (The Visionary), Larry Roberts (ARPANET Leader), and Jon Postel (The Internet's Editor).Sources referenced in this video: This deep dive draws directly from historical reports, research papers from ResearchGate, DARPA and NSF archives, and the collaborative work of Internet Hall of Fame inductees.#InternetHistory #ARPANET #NSFNET #TCPIP #WebHistory #ComputerScience #TechDocumentary
In this special documentary episode, Patrick Gray and Amberleigh Jack take a historical dive into hacking in the 1980s. Through the words of those that were there, they discuss life on the ARPANET, the 414s hacking group, the Morris Worm, the vibe inside the NSA and a parallel hunt for German hackers happening at a similar time to Cliff Stoll's famous Cuckoo's Egg story. This podcast features the memories of: Jon Callas, former principal software engineer at Digital Equipment Corporation Mark Rasch, Morris Worm prosecutor Timothy Winslow, former 414 hacker Greg Chartrand, author of Cracking the Cuckoos Egg and Tony Sager, former NSA How the World Got Owned is produced in partnership with SentinelOne. Show notes 1988 Federal sentencing guidelines manual Computer Intruder is put on probation and fined $10,000 | The New York Times Computer Intruder is found guilty | The New York Times United States of America, Appellee, v. Robert Tappan Morris, Defendant-appellant, 928 F.2d 504 (2d Cir. 1991) The Cuckoo's Egg: Tracking a Spy Through the Maze of Computer Espionage | Clifford Stoll Cracking the Cuckoo's Egg: The Untold Story of tracking and finding Karl Koch aka Hagbard of the Chaos Computer Club | Greg Chartrand Computer Buffs Tapped NASA Files | The New York Times Young Computer Bandits Byte off More than They Could Chew | The Washington Post ‘Hacker' is used by Mainstream Media, September 5, 1983 | EDN Neal Patrick to testify before congressional committee Wargames official trailer, 1983 CBS News Segment on Robert Morris Computer Hacker The Fall of the Berlin Wall | Sky News I Hacked a Nuclear Facility in the 1980's. You're Welcome | CNN
https://youtu.be/05Gr2y9cGsU See the free preview on my new YouTube (like, sub, bell)On today's episode of the Occult Symbolism and Pop Culture with Isaac Weishaupt podcast we break down Stranger Things Season 5! It was an occult initiation ritual from Netflix and I've decoded it! Join me as we explore and unpack the themes you may have missed: Kabbalah's shattered vessels, Eleven's alchemical great work, the Abyss of Da'ath, MKULTRA, hive minds, saturnian time collapse and the Qlippoth god of chaos Vecna! We'll get into complex territories of Kenneth Grant's Tunnels of Set (and how it relates to Will's coming out scene), ARPANet cosmic consciousness and parallel dimensions!Join any of the supporter feeds to unlock this January BONUS episode only for supporters! Tier 2 on Patreon.com/IlluminatiWatcher and VIP Section will unlock the video version (*which is packed full of useful images)! See the free preview on my new YouTube (like, sub, bell): https://youtu.be/05Gr2y9cGsULINKS:Stranger Things September S1-S4 https://www.illuminatiwatcher.com/stranger-things-september-special-announcementShow sponsors- Get discounts while you support the show and do a little self improvement!*CopyMyCrypto.com/Isaac is where you can copy James McMahon's crypto holdings- listeners get access for just $1 WANT MORE?... Check out my UNCENSORED show with my wife, Breaking Social Norms: https://breakingsocialnorms.com/GRIFTER ALLEY- get bonus content AND go commercial free + other perks:*PATREON.com/IlluminatiWatcher : ad free, HUNDREDS of bonus shows, early access AND TWO OF MY BOOKS! (The Dark Path and Kubrick's Code); you can join the conversations with hundreds of other show supporters here: Patreon.com/IlluminatiWatcher (*Patreon is also NOW enabled to connect with Spotify! https://rb.gy/hcq13)*VIP SECTION: Due to the threat of censorship, I set up a Patreon-type system through MY OWN website! IIt's even setup the same: FREE ebooks, Kubrick's Code video! Sign up at: https://illuminatiwatcher.com/members-section/*APPLE PREMIUM: If you're on the Apple Podcasts app- just click the Premium button and you're in! NO more ads, Early Access, EVERY BONUS EPISODE More from Isaac- links and special offers:*BREAKING SOCIAL NORMS podcast, Index of EVERY episode (back to 2014), Signed paperbacks, shirts, & other merch, Substack, YouTube links, appearances & more: https://allmylinks.com/isaacw *STATEMENT: This show is full of Isaac's useless opinions and presented for entertainment purposes. Audio clips used in Fair Use and taken from YouTube videos.
Privacy-Serie Teil 6: In dieser Episode werfen wir einen Blick hinter die Kulissen des Internets: Wie funktioniert es technisch? Was sind ISPs, IPs und DNS? Und vor allem – welche Risiken für unsere Privatsphäre lauern auf dem Weg ins Netz? Wir erzählen die Geschichte vom ARPANET bis zur Glasfaser, hören Originaltöne von Bill Gates und Senator Ted Stevens und erklären verständlich, wie VPNs, Tor und DNS-Verschlüsselung helfen können, auch im WWW Privatsphäre zu wahren. Dazu gibt's ein Gespräch mit einem alten Nodesignal-Bekannten – Cerca! Von Cerca erfahren wir, wie wir selbstbestimmt online gehen können.Von und mit: - Chris - CercatrovaProduziert und geschnitten: ChrisHier könnt ihr uns eine Spende über Lightning da lassen: ⚡️nodesignal@getalby.comNeben dem Podcast findet ihr uns auch auf YouTubeFür Feedback und weitergehenden Diskussionen kommt gerne in die Telegramgruppe von Nodesignal und bewertet uns bei Spotify und Apple Podcasts, das hilft uns sehr. Folgt uns auch gerne bei Nostr:npub1n0devk3h2l3rx6vmt24a3lz4hsxp7j8rn3x44jkx6daj7j8jzc0q2u02cy und Twitter.Blockzeit: 928298Cerca auf Nostr: npub1nxzp3zn90r44z07aeajc7wyah4fju49c9d3g45mxvmm64rmnrdusffch7mSRF - Die Cookie Falle Nodesignal-Talk - E204 - Hey Calso, why privacy matters!Nodesignal-Talk - E211 - Mobiltelefon mag Metadaten(1) mit Max HillebrandNodesignal-Talk – E215 – DAS MEGA-META-DATEN-RABBIT-HOLENodesignal-Talk - E222 - GrapheneOS mit JohannesNodesignal-Talk - E250 - Privacy 5 - Linux im GymInternet Society – A Brief History of the InternetKompakter Überblick zur technischen und sozialen Entwicklung des Internets seit den 1960ern.A Brief History of the InternetYouTube: Bill Gates erklärt 1995 das Internet bei LettermanLegendäres Talkshow-Interview – Gates beschreibt das Internet, Publikum reagiert skeptisch.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JUs7iG1mNjIWikipedia – “Series of tubes” (Ted Stevens, 2006)Ursprung und Folgen der berühmten „Röhren“-Analogie aus dem US-Senat.Series of tubes - WikipediaCloudflare Lernzentrum – Wie funktioniert das Internet?Übersicht über Routing, DNS, Backbone, Protokolle, IP und mehr.How does the Internet work? | CloudflareMullvad Blog: Hausdurchsuchung 2023 – Keine Nutzerdaten vorhandenReale Prüfung des No-Logs-Versprechens.https://mullvad.net/en/blog/2023/5/3/mullvad-vpn-was-subjected-to-a-search-warrant/Tor Project – Offizielle Einführung und technische ErklärungFunktionsweise, Onion-Routing, Sicherheit, Anwendungsbereiche.About TorMozilla: Was ist DNS-over-HTTPS (DoH)?Technische Einführung zur verschlüsselten DNS-Auflösung im Browser.https://support.mozilla.org/de/kb/dns-ueber-https-doVerivox – Geschichte der Internet-Flatrate in DeutschlandEntwicklung von Minutenabrechnung über Volumentarife bis zur Flatrate.https://www.verivox.de/themen/internet/internet-flatrate/Bundesnetzagentur – Netzneutralität und VerkehrsmanagementAktuelle rechtliche Lage und Diskussion in Deutschland und der EU.https://www.bundesnetzagentur.de/DE/Sachgebiete/Telekommunikation/Unternehmen_Institutionen/Netzneutralitaet/netzneutralitaet-node.htmlMusik - alle Songs sind Royalty Free – Danke für den guten Sound!!!Aaron Kenny - The curious kitten Emmit Fenn - AloneYung Logos - Mysterious Strange Things Qincas Moreira - Bunny Hop pATCHES - Consciousness Rabbit True Cuckoo - This is Not a dolphinJohn Patitucci - On the DeltaThe Soundlings - Moving in the shadows John Patitucci - Spaghetti EasternTimestamps:(00:00:00) Intro(00:00:22) Intro Internet(00:04:50) Die Geschichte des Internets(00:09:08) Wie funktioniert das Internet?(00:12:42) Angriffspunkte für Überwachung und Tracking(00:18:15) Alternative Zugänge zum Internet(00:19:11) Tools für mehr Privatsphäre(00:27:10) Zusammenfassung Intro & Start Interview mit Cerca(00:30:04) Cerca, wie funktioniert das Internet?(00:34:11) Wie gläsern macht uns der Internetanbieter(00:36:38) Wie sicher sind VPNs?(00:40:29) OPNsens(00:42:34) DNS?(00:51:50) TOR Browser und Onion Routing(00:58:07) Wo nutze ich VPN und wo TOR?(01:01:13) Firewall(01:06:22) Was ist der alltagstaugliche Mittelweg?(01:21:46) Wie steht es um die Regulierung in der CH?(01:26:18) Danke an Cerca und Focus on the ...
professorjrod@gmail.comIn this episode of Technology Tap: CompTIA Study Guide, we explore the fascinating evolution of technology from the launch of Sputnik in 1957 to the ubiquitous smartphones of today. Discover how early innovations like ARPANET laid the groundwork for the internet, shaping the landscape of technology education and IT skills development. Whether you're part of a study group preparing for your CompTIA exam or seeking expert IT certification tips, this episode provides valuable insights into the origins of the digital world and how it influences modern tech exam prep. Join us as we connect the dots between history and today's technology challenges to help you succeed in your IT certification journey.We start with Licklider's prophetic vision and the leap from circuit switching to packet switching that made failure-tolerant networks possible. Email gives the net its first social heartbeat. TCP/IP stitches islands into one internet. Tim Berners-Lee's simple stack—HTML, HTTP, URLs—opens the door for everyone. The home dial-up era arrives, and the browser becomes the interface of daily curiosity. Mosaic and Netscape ignite innovation; Microsoft's bundling forces a reckoning; Mozilla and later Chrome reshape standards and speed for the modern era.The dot‑com bubble teaches hard lessons, but Google's PageRank reframes the problem: organize the world's information with relevance, not clutter. Broadband and Wi‑Fi make the net always on, enabling streaming, online gaming, and richer apps. Napster breaks open music, litigation clamps down, and then paid streaming wins on convenience. Social networks shift the center of gravity from pages to people; YouTube turns everyone into a publisher and archivist. E‑commerce perfects logistics, and smartphones put it all in your hand. The cloud becomes the engine behind Netflix, Uber, TikTok, and the systems that silently scale our daily tools.We confront the dark side, too: ransomware, botnets, data breaches, and insecure IoT devices that expand the attack surface. Algorithms now shape what we see and believe, while fiber backbones and 5G push speed and density to new highs. AI becomes the thinking layer of the internet, interpreting, recommending, and generating content at scale. A rising push for decentralization—blockchains, IPFS, self-sovereign identity—seeks to return control to users and reduce dependence on gatekeepers. Where does it all go from here? From ambient computing to satellite constellations and new interfaces, the net may soon fade into the background—omnipresent and invisible.If you enjoyed this deep dive, follow the show, share it with a friend who loves tech history, and leave a quick review so more curious listeners can find us. Your support helps us keep exploring the stories that built our digital world.Support the showArt By Sarah/DesmondMusic by Joakim KarudLittle chacha ProductionsJuan Rodriguez can be reached atTikTok @ProfessorJrodProfessorJRod@gmail.com@Prof_JRodInstagram ProfessorJRod
Famously, we trace the Internet to ARPANET, a research network built for the US defense agency DARPA. But in the 1960s and 70s, ARPANET was just one of several computer networks operating around the world. And while it had users and cool technical innovations, it was a research tool. And it wasn't growing particularly fast. How did that turn into the capital-I Internet? We can blame - in part - Japanese supercomputers. In today's video, we explore the Japanese peril that brought us the Internet.
Famously, we trace the Internet to ARPANET, a research network built for the US defense agency DARPA. But in the 1960s and 70s, ARPANET was just one of several computer networks operating around the world. And while it had users and cool technical innovations, it was a research tool. And it wasn't growing particularly fast. How did that turn into the capital-I Internet? We can blame - in part - Japanese supercomputers. In today's video, we explore the Japanese peril that brought us the Internet.
It's time to dive into the history of Gmail... but it didn't start with Google at all... In fact, it started very differently... Purrfectly, some might say. On this episode we discuss the strange phenomenon of Garfield Mail, the original Gmail. Then we pitch some ideas for making email better, reminisce about products from Google's past, get into movies in the MouthGarf Report, and play a rousing game of I See What You Did There.Sources:https://gizmodo.com/the-original-gmail-was-garfield-mail-1822970617https://historyandmystery.org/interesting-history/the-first-gmail-was-associated-with-garfield-the-cat/https://www.cracked.com/article_28656_4-wtf-tales-from-early-days-internet.htmlPlease give us a 5 star rating on Apple Podcasts! Want to ask us a question? Talk to us! Email debutbuddies@gmail.comListen to the archives of Kelly and Chelsea's awesome horror movie podcast, Never Show the Monster.Get some sci-fi from Spaceboy Books.Get down with Michael J. O'Connor and the Cold Family and check out his new compilation The Best of the Bad Years 2005 - 2025Next time: First Presidential Convention in Arkansas
On this episode of Christopher Lochhead: Follow Your Different, we sit down with business thinker Joe Pine, the legendary co-author of "The Experience Economy," for an in-depth conversation about building a career around unique ideas. Joe Pine shares insights from his early days as a self-described nerd at IBM to his role in shaping the field of mass customization and ultimately designing a business that made him stand out as a category of one. The discussion moves fluidly from personal transformation to the sweeping changes he helped pioneer in business, and what it means to thrive as a creator capitalist in today's rapidly changing world. You're listening to Christopher Lochhead: Follow Your Different. We are the real dialogue podcast for people with a different mind. So get your mind in a different place, and hey ho, let's go. Finding a Different Path: From Palo Alto to Publishing with Harvard Joe Pine's journey began in Palo Alto during the era of the Arpanet, with technology in his blood and a passion for applied mathematics. Pine joined IBM in 1980, at its peak as arguably the most desirable company for ambitious technologists. Despite a technical start, he found himself increasingly drawn to management, strategy, and the world of business ideas. His trajectory changed dramatically when IBM sent him to MIT for a master's in the management of technology. There, Pine encountered Stan Davis's concept of "mass customization" and felt a lightning bolt of inspiration. Deciding to turn his MIT thesis into a book, Pine landed a contract with Harvard Business School Press. The credential of publishing with Harvard, he notes, was a powerful stamp of intellectual rigor. As he recalls, “Harvard puts its stamp on it, says this is intellectually rigorous. This is a good book. This ought to be out in the world, and we want to publish it.” Joe Pine on Leaping from Employee to Icon, and Creating the Experience Economy With his first book in hand, Pine found himself at a crossroads. The culture at IBM was changing, and a timely severance package offered him a financial cushion to take a risk. Encouraged by thought leaders he admired, he struck out on his own. Initially, IBM remained his primary client, but Pine quickly built a reputation for leading-edge thinking and collaborating with other luminaries like Don Peppers and Jim Gilmore. The launch of "The Experience Economy" marked a turning point, not just for Pine, but for the business landscape itself. He didn't merely spot a trend or invent a new buzzword; he named and framed a fundamental shift in the economy's fabric. “We didn't identify a fad, but a fundamental change in the fabric of the economy. And if it is a change in the economy, then it is always going to go like that, right? Until something surpasses it and it starts to go down as happened with commodities and goods and services.” The central idea that businesses must stage memorable experiences to remain relevant only grew more compelling over time, with Pine's frameworks gaining more relevance as the digital age accelerated. Transformation and Identity in the Age of AI As the episode moves to the present, Pine discusses how transformation, both personal and organizational, is ultimately about changing identity. He credits much of his own success to an ability to recognize patterns and develop frameworks to describe and prescribe changes in business. Pine's recent work, including his Substack and newest book, explores not just customer experience but transformation itself, emphasizing that “all transformation is identity change.” The conversation turns to AI and the breaking waves of change it represents for businesses today, paralleling Pine's earlier identification of evolving economic eras. He sees transformation as most successful when companies or individuals are willing to fundamentally shift who they are, not just what they do. “The identity issues there are paramount because who you think you are often stops you from being able to do these things because it would change who you are so much.” Joe Pine believes that in the new world shaped by AI, those who can shed old identities and truly reinvent themselves—much as he did when he left IBM—will be the ones to define the next era. The lesson for aspiring creator capitalists is clear: the greatest value comes not only from unique ideas but also from the courage to turn those ideas into new identities, new categories, and new realities. To hear more from Joe Pine and how he built a business with his Intellectual Capital, download and listen to this episode. Bio Joe Pine is a renowned author, speaker, and management advisor best known as the co-author of The Experience Economy, a groundbreaking book that reshaped how businesses create value. His work introduced the concept that companies must orchestrate memorable experiences to remain competitive in an evolving marketplace. With deep expertise in innovation and customer experience design, Joe helps organizations around the world architect differentiated experiences that drive growth and loyalty. He has worked with leading global brands across industries from retail and hospitality to healthcare and technology. Joe is also a sought-after keynote speaker and co-founder of Strategic Horizons LLP. His insights continue to influence leaders seeking to transform the way they engage customers. Links Connect with Joe Pine! LinkedIn | Strategic Horizons We hope you enjoyed this episode of Christopher Lochhead: Follow Your Different™! Christopher loves hearing from his listeners. Feel free to email him, connect on Facebook, X (formerly Twitter), Instagram, and subscribe on Apple Podcast / Spotify!
Miguel Ángel González Suárez te presenta el Informativo de Primera Hora en 'El Remate', el programa matinal de La Diez Capital Radio que arranca tu día con: Las noticias más relevantes de Canarias, España y el mundo, analizadas con rigor y claridad. Miguel Ángel González Suárez te presenta el Informativo de Primera Hora en 'El Remate', el programa matinal de La Diez Capital Radio que arranca tu día con: Las noticias más relevantes de Canarias, España y el mundo, analizadas con rigor y claridad. Un día como hoy hace dos años se forma el nuevo Gobierno de Pedro Sánchez. Y hoy hace dos años: Ángel Víctor Torres, nuevo ministro de Política Territorial y Memoria Democrática. Hoy hace 365 días: Las eléctricas se libran de las multas por los ‘ceros energéticos’ El Gobierno de Canarias anuncia que tendrá que devolver más de 50 millones abonados por sanciones desde 2018 al caducar su plazo durante el procedimiento de cobro. Hoy se cumplen 1.378 días del cruel ataque e invasión de Rusia a Ucrania. 3 años y 268 días. Hoy es viernes 21 de noviembre de 2025. Día Mundial de la Televisión. El 21 de noviembre es el Día Mundial de la Televisión, una efeméride impulsada por la ONU desde el año 1996 y que busca propiciar el uso responsable de la televisión como uno de los principales canales de difusión de información pública. Aunque para las generaciones actuales, se puede pensar que Internet es el medio de difusión más importante, lo cierto es que la web ha ofrecido a la televisión nuevas herramientas y recursos que, más que desplazarla, la han potenciado, como por ejemplo las difusiones en directo y el acceso a contenidos audiovisuales desde cualquier lugar y desde cualquier dispositivo. Actualmente la televisión es el medio de comunicación por excelencia, ya que permite transmitir en vivo sucesos, acontecimientos y trabajos humanitarios realizados por la ONU y las organizaciones asociadas a ella. 1877: En Nueva York (Estados Unidos), Thomas Edison anuncia la creación del fonógrafo, instrumento para grabar y reproducir sonidos. 1916: En el mar Egeo ―en el marco de la Primera Guerra Mundial― se hunde el Britannic (buque hermano del Titanic) tras hacer estallar una mina marina. Mueren 29 personas. 21 de noviembre de 1969: Se establece en Estados Unidos el primer enlace de la red ARPANET (antecesora de la actual Internet), entre dos computadoras, ubicadas en la UCLA (Universidad de California en Los Ángeles) y la Universidad Stanford. 1995.- Acuerdo de Dayton (EEUU) para los Balcanes: los presidentes de Serbia, Slobodan Milosevic; Croacia, Franjo Tudjman, y Bosnia, Alia Izetbegovic, firman un acuerdo marco de paz que pone fin a una guerra de cuatro años. 2000: La Fábrica Nacional de Moneda y Timbre de España hace los últimos billetes en pesetas. Santos Honorio, Rufo, Esteban y Celso. La UE exige su inclusión en el plan de paz ruso-estadounidense para poner fin a la guerra en Ucrania ¿En qué lugar de la Unión Europea hay más paro de larga duración? El Supremo condena al fiscal general por revelación de datos con una inhabilitación de dos años y una multa de 7.200 euros. Feijóo pide la dimisión de Sánchez tras la condena del fiscal general, que "se prestó a ser un peón de la estrategia política" El Gobierno muestra su "respeto" a la condena del Supremo al fiscal general del Estado pero "no la comparte" Libertad provisional para el presidente y el vicepresidente de la diputación de Almería y el alcalde de Fines. Coalición Canaria se quedaría sin su diputada, según la proyección de escaños a partir del CIS de noviembre. La subida de Vox amenaza al centro derecha regionalista estatal con unos resultados muy precarios, especialmente en la provincia de Santa Cruz de Tenerife. Clavijo no descarta acudir a los tribunales por la reforma de la financiación autonómica: “Si no nos queda más remedio, lo haremos” El presidente canario habla de "una recesión que va a ser bastante traumática para la población" Canarias bonificará hasta el 75% de los gastos de guardería de los autónomos. El vicepresidente regional Manuel Domínguez presenta el Plan Respaldo Autónomo con un paquete de medidas para "impulsar, proteger y acompañar" a este colectivo emprendedor. Bermúdez exige al resto de municipios que atiendan a sus personas sin hogar y que no las envíen a Santa Cruz. El alcalde chicharrero exige al Gobierno canario, durante las jornadas de puertas abiertas del albergue municipal, la puesta en marcha de una unidad móvil que atienda en la calle a los sintecho con problemas mentales. El tráfico en los puertos de Las Palmas crece un 16% y aumentan un 40,6% los cruceros. El tráfico total crece un 16%, impulsado por el aumento del tránsito de mercancías, con un 25,9%; el movimiento de contenedores, que sube un 15,6%; y las toneladas de tráfico Ro-Ro, que aumentan un 14,1%. Un 21 de noviembre de 2014.- La tonadillera Isabel Pantoja, condenada a dos años de prisión por blanqueo de capitales, ingresa en la cárcel sevillana de Alcalá de Guadaira para cumplir su pena. Isabel Pantoja - Así fue - Su mejor concierto en directo - México 2013.
professorjrod@gmail.comWhat if the world's hard drives merged into one invisible place—and you used it a hundred times today without thinking? We pull back the curtain on cloud storage, tracing its unlikely path from room-sized machines and punch cards to AWS's game-changing S3, Dropbox's frictionless sync, and the moment Netflix stopped shipping envelopes and started streaming the future. Along the way, we unpack why storage got so cheap, how reliability reached “eleven nines,” and where the hidden risks still live.We start with J.C.R. Licklider's radical idea—computing as a utility—and follow the thread through ARPANET, early hosting, and the price freefall that turned terabytes into pocket change. Then we shift from enterprise to everyday life: the folder that follows you everywhere, photos that back up before you can worry, and classrooms that collaborate across continents. But convenience has a cost, and we tackle it head on: infamous breaches, painful outages, and the reality that all clouds are built on real servers, power grids, and people. You'll hear how modern security—encryption by default, MFA, redundancy—raised the bar, and why good hygiene still starts with you.The story crescendos with Netflix's bold pivot: betting on bandwidth, partnering with AWS for storage and compute, and building Open Connect to put content near viewers. That playbook—rent the core, own the edge—reshaped entertainment and proved what elastic infrastructure makes possible. We also confront the environmental bill for our “infinite” drive: data centers' energy appetite, the race to renewables, and why the next leap must be cleaner, not just faster and cheaper. Finally, we look ahead to decentralized storage, edge computing, and AI-guided data management—and face the paradox of abundance: when everything can be saved, deletion becomes a superpower.If this journey sharpened how you think about the files you trust to the sky, share it with a friend, hit follow, and leave a quick review. Tell us: what do you trust the cloud with—and what will you delete today?Inspiring Tech Leaders - The Technology PodcastInterviews with Tech Leaders and insights on the latest emerging technology trends.Listen on: Apple Podcasts SpotifySupport the showArt By Sarah/DesmondMusic by Joakim KarudLittle chacha ProductionsJuan Rodriguez can be reached atTikTok @ProfessorJrodProfessorJRod@gmail.com@Prof_JRodInstagram ProfessorJRod
My fellow pro-growth/progress/abundance Up Wingers,For most of history, stagnation — not growth — was the rule. To explain why prosperity so often stalls, economist Carl Benedikt Frey offers a sweeping tour through a millennium of innovation and upheaval, showing how societies either harness — or are undone by — waves of technological change. His message is sobering: an AI revolution is no guarantee of a new age of progress.Today on Faster, Please! — The Podcast, I talk with Frey about why societies midjudge their trajectory and what it takes to reignite lasting growth.Frey is a professor of AI and Work at the Oxford Internet Institute and a fellow of Mansfield College, University of Oxford. He is the director of the Future of Work Programme and Oxford Martin Citi Fellow at the Oxford Martin School.He is the author of several books, including the brand new one, How Progress Ends: Technology, Innovation, and the Fate of Nations.In This Episode* The end of progress? (1:28)* A history of Chinese innovation (8:26)* Global competitive intensity (11:41)* Competitive problems in the US (15:50)* Lagging European progress (22:19)* AI & labor (25:46)Below is a lightly edited transcript of our conversation. The end of progress? (1:28). . . once you exploit a technology, the processes that aid that run into diminishing returns, you have a lot of incumbents, you have some vested interests around established technologies, and you need something new to revive growth.Pethokoukis: Since 2020, we've seen the emergence of generative AI, mRNA vaccines, reusable rockets that have returned America to space, we're seeing this ongoing nuclear renaissance including advanced technologies, maybe even fusion, geothermal, the expansion of solar — there seems to be a lot cooking. Is worrying about the end of progress a bit too preemptive?Frey: Well in a way, it's always a bit too preemptive to worry about the future: You don't know what's going to come. But let me put it this way: If you had told me back in 1995 — and if I was a little bit older then — that computers and the internet would lead to a decade streak of productivity growth and then peter out, I would probably have thought you nuts because it's hard to think about anything that is more consequential. Computers have essentially given people the world's store of knowledge basically in their pockets. The internet has enabled us to connect inventors and scientists around the world. There are few tools that aided the research process more. There should hardly be any technology that has done more to boost scientific discovery, and yet we don't see it.We don't see it in the aggregate productivity statistics, so that petered out after a decade. Research productivity is in decline. Measures of breakthrough innovation is in decline. So it's always good to be optimistic, I guess, and I agree with you that, when you say AI and when you read about many of the things that are happening now, it's very, very exciting, but I remain somewhat skeptical that we are actually going to see that leading to a huge revival of economic growth.I would just be surprised if we don't see any upsurge at all, to be clear, but we do have global productivity stagnation right now. It's not just Europe, it's not just Britain. The US is not doing too well either over the past two decades or so. China's productivity is probably in the negative territory or stagnant, by more optimistic measures, and so we're having a growth problem.If tech progress were inevitable, why have predictions from the '90s, and certainly earlier decades like the '50s and '60s, about transformative breakthroughs and really fast economic growth by now, consistently failed to materialize? How does your thesis account for why those visions of rapid growth and progress have fallen short?I'm not sure if my thesis explains why those expectations didn't materialize, but I'm hopeful that I do provide some framework for thinking about why we've often seen historically rapid growth spurts followed by stagnation and even decline. The story I'm telling is not rocket science, exactly. It's basically built on the simple intuitions that once you exploit a technology, the processes that aid that run into diminishing returns, you have a lot of incumbents, you have some vested interests around established technologies, and you need something new to revive growth.So for example, the Soviet Union actually did reasonably well in terms of economic growth. A lot of it, or most of it, was centered on heavy industry, I should say. So people didn't necessarily see the benefits in their pockets, but the economy grew rapidly for about four decades or so, then growth petered out, and eventually it collapsed. So for exploiting mass-production technologies, the Soviet system worked reasonably well. Soviet bureaucrats could hold factory managers accountable by benchmarking performance across factories.But that became much harder when something new was needed because when something is new, what's the benchmark? How do you benchmark against that? And more broadly, when something is new, you need to explore, and you need to explore often different technological trajectories. So in the Soviet system, if you were an aircraft engineer and you wanted to develop your prototype, you could go to the red arm and ask for funding. If they turned you down, you maybe had two or three other options. If they turned you down, your idea would die with you.Conversely, in the US back in '99, Bessemer Venture declined to invest in Google, which seemed like a bad idea with the benefit of hindsight, but it also illustrates that Google was no safe bet at the time. Yahoo and Alta Vista we're dominating search. You need somebody to invest in order to know if something is going to catch on, and in a more decentralized system, you can have more people taking different bets and you can explore more technological trajectories. That is one of the reasons why the US ended up leading the computer revolutions to which Soviet contributions were basically none.Going back to your question, why didn't those dreams materialize? I think we've made it harder to explore. Part of the reason is protective regulation. Part of the reason is lobbying by incumbents. Part of the reason is, I think, a revolving door between institutions like the US patent office and incumbents where we see in the data that examiners tend to grant large firms some patents that are of low quality and then get lucrative jobs at those places. That's creating barriers to entry. That's not good for new startups and inventors entering the marketplace. I think that is one of the reasons that we haven't seen some of those dreams materialize.A history of Chinese innovation (8:26)So while Chinese bureaucracy enabled scale, Chinese bureaucracy did not really permit much in terms of decentralized exploration, which European fragmentation aided . . .I wonder if your analysis of pre-industrial China, if there's any lessons you can draw about modern China as far as the way in which bad governance can undermine innovation and progress?Pre-industrial China has a long history. China was the technology leader during the Song and Tang dynasties. It had a meritocratic civil service. It was building infrastructure on scales that were unimaginable in Europe at the time, and yet it didn't have an industrial revolution. So while Chinese bureaucracy enabled scale, Chinese bureaucracy did not really permit much in terms of decentralized exploration, which European fragmentation aided, and because there was lots of social status attached to becoming a bureaucrat and passing the civil service examination, if Galileo was born in China, he would probably become a bureaucrat rather than a scientist, and I think that's part of the reason too.But China mostly did well when the state was strong rather than weak. A strong state was underpinned by intensive political competition, and once China had unified and there were fewer peer competitors, you see that the center begins to fade. They struggle to tax local elites in order to keep the peace. People begin to erect monopolies in their local markets and collide with guilds to protect production and their crafts from competition.So during the Qing dynasty, China begins to decline, whereas we see the opposite happening in Europe. European fragmentation aids exploration and innovation, but it doesn't necessarily aid scaling, and so that is something that Europe needs to come to terms with at a later stage when the industrial revolution starts to take off. And even before that, market integration played an important role in terms of undermining the guilds in Europe, and so part of the reason why the guilds persist longer in China is the distance is so much longer between cities and so the guilds are less exposed to competition. In the end, Europe ends up overtaking China, in large part because vested interests are undercut by governments, but also because of investments in things that spur market integration.Global competitive intensity (11:41)Back in the 2000s, people predicted that China would become more like the United States, now it looks like the United States is becoming more like China.This is a great McKinsey kind of way of looking at the world: The notion that what drives innovation is sort of maximum competitive intensity. You were talking about the competitive intensity in both Europe and in China when it was not so centralized. You were talking about the competitive intensity of a fragmented Europe.Do you think that the current level of competitive intensity between the United States and China —and I really wish I could add Europe in there. Plenty of white papers, I know, have been written about Europe's competitive state and its in innovativeness, and I hope those white papers are helpful and someone reads them, but it seems to be that the real competition is between United States and China.Do you not think that that competitive intensity will sort of keep those countries progressing despite any of the barriers that might pop up and that you've already mentioned a little bit? Isn't that a more powerful tailwind than any of the headwinds that you've mentioned?It could be, I think, if people learn the right lessons from history, at least that's a key argument of the book. Right now, what I'm seeing is the United States moving more towards protectionist with protective tariffs. Right now, what I see is a move towards, we could even say crony capitalism with tariff exemptions that some larger firms that are better-connected to the president are able to navigate, but certainly not challengers. You're seeing the United States embracing things like golden shares in Intel, and perhaps even extending that to a range of companies. Back in the 2000s, people predicted that China would become more like the United States, now it looks like the United States is becoming more like China.And China today is having similar problems and on, I would argue, an even greater scale. Growth used to be the key objective in China, and so for local governments, provincial governments competing on such targets, it was fairly easy to benchmark and measure and hold provincial governors accountable, and they would be promoted inside the Communist Party based on meeting growth targets. Now, we have prioritized common prosperity, more national security-oriented concerns.And so in China, most progress has been driven by private firms and foreign-invested firms. State-owned enterprise has generally been a drag on innovation and productivity. What you're seeing, though, as China is shifting more towards political objectives, it's harder to mobilize private enterprise, where the yard sticks are market share and profitability, for political goals. That means that China is increasingly relying more again on state-owned enterprises, which, again, have been a drag on innovation.So, in principle, I agree with you that historically you did see Russian defeat to Napoleon leading to this Stein-Hardenberg Reforms, and the abolishment of Gilded restrictions, and a more competitive marketplace for both goods and ideas. You saw that Russian losses in the Crimean War led to the of abolition of serfdom, and so there are many times in history where defeat, in particular, led to striking reforms, but right now, the competition itself doesn't seem to lead to the kinds of reforms I would've hoped to see in response.Competitive problems in the US (15:50)I think what antitrust does is, at the very least, it provides a tool that means that businesses are thinking twice before engaging in anti-competitive behavior.I certainly wrote enough pieces and talked to enough people over the past decade who have been worried about competition in the United States, and the story went something like this: that you had these big tech companies — Google, and Meta, Facebook and Microsoft — that these were companies were what they would call “forever companies,” that they had such dominance in their core businesses, and they were throwing off so much cash that these were unbeatable companies, and this was going to be bad for America. People who made that argument just could not imagine how any other companies could threaten their dominance. And yet, at the time, I pointed out that it seemed to me that these companies were constantly in fear that they were one technological advance from being in trouble.And then lo and behold, that's exactly what happened. And while in AI, certainly, Google's super important, and Meta Facebook are super important, so are OpenAI, and so is Anthropic, and there are other companies.So the point here, after my little soliloquy, is can we overstate these problems, at least in the United States, when it seems like it is still possible to create a new technology that breaks the apparent stranglehold of these incumbents? Google search does not look quite as solid a business as it did in 2022.Can we overstate the competitive problems of the United States, or is what you're saying more forward-looking, that perhaps we overstated the competitive problems in the past, but now, due to these tariffs, and executives having to travel to the White House and give the president gifts, that that creates a stage for the kind of competitive problems that we should really worry about?I'm very happy to support the notion that technological changes can lead to unpredictable outcomes that incumbents may struggle to predict and respond to. Even if they predict it, they struggle to act upon it because doing so often undermines the existing business model.So if you take Google, where the transformer was actually conceived, the seven people behind it, I think, have since left the company. One of the reasons that they probably didn't launch anything like ChatGPT was probably for the fear of cannibalizing search. So I think the most important mechanisms for dislodging incumbents are dramatic shifts in technology.None of the legacy media companies ended up leading social media. None of the legacy retailers ended up leading e-commerce. None of the automobile leaders are leading in EVs. None of the bicycle companies, which all went into automobile, so many of them, ended up leading. So there is a pattern there.At the same time, I think you do have to worry that there are anti-competitive practices going on that makes it harder, and that are costly. The revolving door between the USPTO and companies is one example of that. We also have a reasonable amount of evidence on killer acquisitions whereby firms buy up a competitor just to shut it down. Those things are happening. I think you need to have tools that allow you to combat that, and I think more broadly, the United States has a long history of fairly vigorous antitrust policy. I think it'd be a hard pressed to suggest that that has been a tremendous drag on American business or American dynamism. So if you don't think, for example, that American antitrust policy has contributed to innovation and dynamism, at the very least, you can't really say either that it's been a huge drag on it.In Japan, for example, in its postwar history, antitrust was extremely lax. In the United States, it was very vigorous, and it was very vigorous throughout the computer revolution as well, which it wasn't at all in Japan. If you take the lawsuit against IBM, for example, you can debate this. To what extent did it force it to unbundle hardware and software, and would Microsoft been the company it is today without that? I think AT&T, it's both the breakup and it's deregulation, as well, but I think by basically all accounts, that was a good idea, particularly at the time when the National Science Foundation released ARPANET into the world.I think what antitrust does is, at the very least, it provides a tool that means that businesses are thinking twice before engaging in anti-competitive behavior. There's always a risk of antitrust being heavily politicized, and that's always been a bad idea, but at the same time, I think having tools on the books that allows you to check monopolies and steer their investments more towards the innovation rather than anti-competitive practices, I think is, broadly speaking, a good thing. I think in the European Union, you often hear that competition policy is a drag on productivity. I think it's the least of Europe's problem.Lagging European progress (22:19)If you take the postwar period, at least Europe catches up in most key industries, and actually lead in some of them. . . but doesn't do the same in digital. The question in my mind is: Why is that?Let's talk about Europe as we sort of finish up. We don't have to write How Progress Ends, it seems like progress has ended, so maybe we want to think about how progress restarts, and is the problem in Europe, is it institutions or is it the revealed preference of Europeans, that they're getting what they want? That they don't value progress and dynamism, that it is a cultural preference that is manifested in institutions? And if that's the case — you can tell me if that's not the case, I kind of feel like it might be the case — how do you restart progress in Europe since it seems to have already ended?The most puzzling thing to me is not that Europe is less dynamic than the United States — that's not very puzzling at all — but that it hasn't even managed to catch up in digital. If you take the postwar period, at least Europe catches up in most key industries, and actually lead in some of them. So in a way, take automobiles, electrical machinery, chemicals, pharmaceuticals, nobody would say that Europe is behind in those industries, or at least not for long. Europe has very robust catchup growth in the post-war period, but doesn't do the same in digital. The question in my mind is: Why is that?I think part of the reason is that the returns to innovation, the returns to scaling in Europe are relatively muted by a fragmented market in services, in particular. The IMF estimates that if you take all trade barriers on services inside the European Union and you add them up, it's something like 110 percent tariffs. Trump Liberation Day tariffs, essentially, imposed within European Union. That means that European firms in digital and in services don't have a harmonized market to scale into, the way the United States and China has. I think that's by far the biggest reason.On top of that, there are well-intentioned regulations like the GDPR that, by any account, has been a drag on innovation, and particularly been harmful for startups, whereas larger firms that find it easier to manage compliance costs have essentially managed to offset those costs by capturing a larger share of the market. I think the AI Act is going in the same direction there, ad so you have more hurdles, you have greater costs of innovating because of those regulatory barriers. And then the return to innovation is more capped by having a smaller, fragmented market.I don't think that culture or European lust for leisure rather than work is the key reason. I think there's some of that, but if you look at the most dynamic places in Europe, it tends to be the Scandinavian countries and, being from Sweden myself, I can tell you that most people you will encounter there are not workaholics.AI & labor (25:46)I think AI at the moment has a real resilience problem. It's very good that things where there's a lot of precedent, it doesn't do very well where precedence is thin.As I finish up, let me ask you: Like a lot of economists who think about technology, you've thought about how AI will affect jobs — given what we've seen in the past few years, would it be your guess that, if we were to look at the labor force participation rates of the United States and other rich countries 10 years from now, that we will look at those employment numbers and think, “Wow, we can really see the impact of AI on those numbers”? Will it be extraordinarily evident, or would it be not as much?Unless there's very significant progress in AI, I don't think so. I think AI at the moment has a real resilience problem. It's very good that things where there's a lot of precedent, it doesn't do very well where precedence is thin. So in most activities where the world is changing, and the world is changing every day, you can't really rely on AI to reliably do work for you.An example of that, most people know of AlphaGo beating the world champion back in 2016. Few people will know that, back in 2023, human amateurs, using standard laptops, exposing the best Go programs to new positions that they would not have encountered in training, actually beat the best Go programs quite easily. So even in a domain where basically the problem is solved, where we already achieved super-human intelligence, you cannot really know how well these tools perform when circumstances change, and I think that that's really a problem. So unless we solve that, I don't think it's going to have an impact that will mean that labor force participation is going to be significantly lower 10 years from now.That said, I do think it's going to have a very significant impact on white collar work, and people's income and sense of status. I think of generative AI, in particular, as a tool that reduces barriers to entry in professional services. I often compare it to what happened with Uber and taxi services. With the arrival of GPS technology, knowing the name of every street in New York City was no longer a particularly valuable skill, and then with a platform matching supply and demand, anybody could essentially get into their car who has a driver's license and top up their incomes on the side. As a result of that, incumbent drivers faced more competition, they took a pay cut of around 10 percent.Obviously, a key difference with professional services is that they're traded. So I think it's very likely that, as generative AI reduces the productivity differential between people in, let's say the US and the Philippines in financial modeling, in paralegal work, in accounting, in a host of professional services, more of those activities will shift abroad, and I think many knowledge workers that had envisioned prosperous careers may feel a sense of loss of status and income as a consequence, and I do think that's quite significant.On sale everywhere The Conservative Futurist: How To Create the Sci-Fi World We Were PromisedFaster, Please! is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit fasterplease.substack.com/subscribe
My guest today is Vinton G. Cerf, widely regarded as a “father of the Internet.” In the 1970s, Vint co-developed the TCP/IP protocols that define how data is formatted, transmitted, and received across devices. In essence, his work enabled networks to communicate, thus laying the foundation for the Internet as a unified global system. He has received honorary degrees and awards that include the National Medal of Technology, the Turing Award, the Presidential Medal of Freedom, the Marconi Prize, and membership in the National Academy of Engineering. He is currently Chief Internet Evangelist at Google.In this episode, Vint reflects on the Internet's path from ARPANET and TCP/IP to the scaling choices that made global connectivity possible. He explains why decentralization was key, and how fiber optics and data centers underwrote explosive growth. Vint also addresses today's policy anxieties (fragmentation, sovereignty walls, and fragile infrastructures…) before looking upward to the interplanetary Internet now linking spacecraft. Finally, we turn to AI: how LLMs are reshaping learning and software, and why the next leap may be systems that question us back. I hope you enjoy our discussion.You can follow me on X (@ProfSchrepel) and BlueSky (@ProfSchrepel).
Vint Cerf, widely recognized as one of the fathers of the Internet, is today’s special guest on Total Network Operations. He currently serves as Vice President and Chief Internet Evangelist at Google. His pioneering work began back in the 1960’s when he was involved in the ARPANET project. Alongside Bob Kahn, Vint co-invented the TCP/IP... Read more »
Vint Cerf, widely recognized as one of the fathers of the Internet, is today’s special guest on Total Network Operations. He currently serves as Vice President and Chief Internet Evangelist at Google. His pioneering work began back in the 1960’s when he was involved in the ARPANET project. Alongside Bob Kahn, Vint co-invented the TCP/IP... Read more »
Building things for people to use has been our guest’s goal since entering university in the 1960s. Total Network Operations is delighted to welcome Jack Haverty, who’s been instrumental in ARPANET operations and innovation, the development of TCP, and more. He takes us through the history of the internet from the early days of ARPANET,... Read more »
Building things for people to use has been our guest’s goal since entering university in the 1960s. Total Network Operations is delighted to welcome Jack Haverty, who’s been instrumental in ARPANET operations and innovation, the development of TCP, and more. He takes us through the history of the internet from the early days of ARPANET,... Read more »
Please enjoy this encore of Career Notes. Chief Executive Officer and Founder of TAG Cyber, Ed Amoroso, shares how he learned on the job and grew his career. In his words, Ed "went from my dad having an ARPANET connection and I'm learning Pascal, to Bell Labs, to CISO, to business, to quitting, to starting something new. And now I'm riding a new exponential up and it's a hell of a ride." Hear from Ed how he sees security as a side dish that you'll progress into naturally once you've paid your dues and mastered a skill like networking, software or databases. We thank Ed for sharing his story with us. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Please enjoy this encore of Career Notes. Chief Executive Officer and Founder of TAG Cyber, Ed Amoroso, shares how he learned on the job and grew his career. In his words, Ed "went from my dad having an ARPANET connection and I'm learning Pascal, to Bell Labs, to CISO, to business, to quitting, to starting something new. And now I'm riding a new exponential up and it's a hell of a ride." Hear from Ed how he sees security as a side dish that you'll progress into naturally once you've paid your dues and mastered a skill like networking, software or databases. We thank Ed for sharing his story with us. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
bookstores, bookstores used as fronts, the left and defense leagues, militias, the Magical Childe/Warlock Shoppe, Colonel Michael Aquino, roommates and their possible uses by the intelligence services, how the security services blackmail and coopt the LGBTQ community, the CIA'S history of LGBTQ blackmail, International (National) Republican Institute (IRI), the IRI's transgender sponsorship in Bangladesh, Marco Rubio, DARPA, Arpanet, counterinsurgency, Edward Lansdale, safe spaces and how there leveraged against people there supposed to protect, the housing crisis and how its leverage against the public, Signal, how Signal is actually damaging (and doesn't protect privacy from the security services), how security services encourage poor leadership and bad behavior in progressive organizations, Bay area Rationalist community, lessons that can be learned from Italian fascist trade organizations, depoliticalization, the use of mental illness to silence political debate, the American Communist Party (ACP) and it's purposeMore on the International Republican Institute's sponsorship of transgender rights in Bangladesh:https://thegrayzone.com/2025/02/07/republicans-transgender-dance-bangladesh/https://thegrayzone.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/IRI-Bangladesh-Final-Report-1.pdfMusic by: Keith Allen Dennishttps://keithallendennis.bandcamp.com/Additional Music by: Double Veteranhttps://flnoise.bandcamp.com/album/double-veteran Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
On today's episode of the Occult Symbolism and Pop Culture with Isaac Weishaupt podcast I'll be posting a discussion I had with Josie Weishaupt on Breaking Social Norms recently because it sheds light on some MAJOR revelations that Dr Jacques Vallee may have been laying down in our interview! Here's what you're in for:You're listening to the “Breaking Social Norms” podcast with the Weishaupts! Get ready for some wild theorizing as we recap the Dr Jacques Vallée interview from Occult Symbolism and Pop Culture podcast: ARPANet, AI, Simulation Theory, Peter Levenda, Sex Magick, Rosicrucianism, J Allen Hynek, Jack Parsons, Collins Elite and the SATAN book! We'll decode some major connections of John Dee & Edward Kelley's wife swapping, Aleister Crowley's LAM, Parsons' Babalon Working, the Mojave Desert with some findings and research on James Shelby Downard's King Kill 33 and even Alchemical secrets of Prague!LINKS:Dr Jacques Vallée Interview: Occult UFOs, Alchemy, AI Evolution, J. Allen Hynek, Collins Elite & More! https://illuminatiwatcher.com/dr-jacques-vallee-interview-occult-ufos-alchemy-ai-evolution-j-allen-hynek-collins-elite-more/What is Alchemy: Alien Origins of Thoth, Emerald Tablets, Carl Jung, Synchromysticism & More! https://breakingsocialnorms.com/2024/06/17/what-is-alchemy-alien-origins-of-thoth-emerald-tablets-carl-jung-synchromysticism-more/ 6/19/24Jack Parsons Pt 1: Strange Angel, Crowley's Thelema, Occult Rituals & More! https://breakingsocialnorms.com/2023/05/23/jack-parsons-pt-1-strange-angel-crowleys-thelema-occult-rituals-more/ 5/23/23Twin Peaks GREY LODGE is now up on my Gumroad store! First several purchases get a FREE FEED LOSER shirt (*while supplies last)! https://isaacw.gumroad.com/l/greylodgeShow sponsors- Get discounts while you support the show and do a little self improvement!*CopyMyCrypto.com/Isaac is where you can copy James McMahon's crypto holdings- listeners get access for just $1 WANT MORE?... Check out my UNCENSORED show with my wife, Breaking Social Norms: https://breakingsocialnorms.com/GRIFTER ALLEY- get bonus content AND go commercial free + other perks:*PATREON.com/IlluminatiWatcher : ad free, HUNDREDS of bonus shows, early access AND TWO OF MY BOOKS! (The Dark Path and Kubrick's Code); you can join the conversations with hundreds of other show supporters here: Patreon.com/IlluminatiWatcher (*Patreon is also NOW enabled to connect with Spotify! https://rb.gy/hcq13)*VIP SECTION: Due to the threat of censorship, I set up a Patreon-type system through MY OWN website! IIt's even setup the same: FREE ebooks, Kubrick's Code video! Sign up at: https://illuminatiwatcher.com/members-section/*APPLE PREMIUM: If you're on the Apple Podcasts app- just click the Premium button and you're in! NO more ads, Early Access, EVERY BONUS EPISODE More from Isaac- links and special offers:*BREAKING SOCIAL NORMS podcast, Index of EVERY episode (back to 2014), Signed paperbacks, shirts, & other merch, Substack, YouTube links & more: https://allmylinks.com/isaacw *STATEMENT: This show is full of Isaac's useless opinions and presented for entertainment purposes. Audio clips used in Fair Use and taken from YouTube videos.
Join the Supporters club: go ad-free, early access, bonus content: Patreon.com/BreakingSocialNorms OR subscribe on the Apple Podcasts app!Get ready for some wild theorizing as we recap the Dr Jacques Vallée interview from Occult Symbolism and Pop Culture podcast: ARPANet, AI, Simulation Theory, Peter Levenda, Sex Magick, Rosicrucianism, J Allen Hynek, Jack Parsons, Collins Elite and the SATAN book! We'll decode some major connections of John Dee & Edward Kelley's wife swapping, Aleister Crowley's LAM, Parsons' Babalon Working, the Mojave Desert with some findings and research on James Shelby Downard's King Kill 33 and even Alchemical secrets of Prague! LINKS: Dr Jacques Vallée Interview: Occult UFOs, Alchemy, AI Evolution, J. Allen Hynek, Collins Elite & More! https://illuminatiwatcher.com/dr-jacques-vallee-interview-occult-ufos-alchemy-ai-evolution-j-allen-hynek-collins-elite-more/What is Alchemy: Alien Origins of Thoth, Emerald Tablets, Carl Jung, Synchromysticism & More! https://breakingsocialnorms.com/2024/06/17/what-is-alchemy-alien-origins-of-thoth-emerald-tablets-carl-jung-synchromysticism-more/ 6/19/24Jack Parsons Pt 1: Strange Angel, Crowley's Thelema, Occult Rituals & More! https://breakingsocialnorms.com/2023/05/23/jack-parsons-pt-1-strange-angel-crowleys-thelema-occult-rituals-more/ 5/23/23You can now sign up for our commercial-free version of the show with a Patreon exclusive bonus show called “Morning Coffee w/ the Weishaupts” at Patreon.com/BreakingSocialNorms OR subscribe on the Apple Podcasts app to get all the same bonus “Morning Coffee” episodes AD-FREE with early access! (*Patreon is also NOW enabled to connect with Spotify! https://rb.gy/r34zj)Want more?…Index of all previous episodes on free feed: https://breakingsocialnorms.com/2021/03/22/index-of-archived-episodes/Leave a review or rating wherever you listen and we'll see what you've got to say!Follow us on the socials:instagram.com/theweishaupts2/Amazon Affiliate shop (*still under construction) with our favorite hair, skin care and horny books: https://breakingsocialnorms.com/2024/08/24/amazon-shopping-list-josie-and-isaacs-list/Check out Isaac's conspiracy podcasts, merch, etc:AllMyLinks.com/IsaacWOccult Symbolism and Pop Culture (on all podcast platforms or IlluminatiWatcher.com)Isaac Weishaupt's book are all on Amazon and Audible; *author narrated audiobooks*STATEMENT: This show is full of Isaac's and Josie's useless opinions and presented for entertainment purposes. Audio clips used in Fair Use and taken from YouTube videos.
För trettio år sedan fick vanliga svenskar tillgång till internet, vilket lade grunden för ett kommunikationsskifte i klass med tryckpressens genombrott. Det tidiga internet präglades av frihet och en nyfiken upptäckarglädje på ett i huvudsak svenskt internet.Tio år senare kontrollerades de viktigaste internettjänsterna, såsom Google och Facebook, av en handfull män i Silicon Valley. Vårt informationsflöde styrdes av algoritmer präglade av amerikansk teknikdeterminism. När smarttelefonerna sedan slog igenom blev många människor algoritmernas slavar.I detta avsnitt av podden Historia Nu samtalar historikern och förläggaren Hugo Nordland med journalisten och författaren Urban Lindstedt om den svenska internethistorien. Lindstedt är aktuell med boken Framtidslöftet: Historien om hur internet förändrade Sverige.Sverige, som redan på 1950-talet byggde några av världens främsta datorer, var en bördig grogrund för den digitala revolutionen. När persondatorerna på 1980-talet började ersätta stordatorerna experimenterade svenska datavetare med anslutningar till det amerikanska Arpanet, som senare skulle utvecklas till internet.I början av 1990-talet präglades Sverige av förändring. Efter kalla krigets slut och Berlinmurens fall dominerade nyliberala idéer både globalt och i Sverige. Offentliga monopol avskaffades, marknader avreglerades och den tekniska utvecklingen öppnade dörrar för entreprenörer att utmana gamla strukturer. Telekomsektorn avreglerades 1993, vilket innebar slutet för Televerkets monopol och banade väg för framväxten av kommersiella internetleverantörer som Swipnet.Internet slog igenom i Sverige under denna period av nyliberalism och teknikoptimism. Svenskarna lockades av löftet om nya möjligheter för den vanliga människan att göra sin röst hörd. Företagen verkade på en friktionsfri marknad där förmögenhet tycktes vara inom räckhåll utan större ansträngning. Sverige gick från en medievärld där två statliga tv-kanaler försökte informera – och ibland tråka ut – befolkningen till ett kaos av underhållning och desinformation. Att handla i fysiska butiker ersattes av omedelbar digital tillfredsställelse, skärpt av algoritmer.Under 2000-talet skedde ett paradigmskifte. Amerikanska tjänster som Google och Facebook introducerades och fick snabbt genomslag även i Sverige. Google, med sin enkla och kraftfulla sökmotor, gjorde det möjligt att på några sekunder hitta information som tidigare krävde timmar av research. Facebook, som slog igenom globalt runt 2007, förändrade hur svenskar kommunicerade, skapade nätverk och delade sina liv online.Bild: Sveriges digitala revolution – från de första internetanslutningarna på 1990-talet till dagens algoritmstyrda informationsflöde. Teknikoptimism, avreglering och globala plattformar har format hur svenskar kommunicerar, handlar och tar del av nyheter. DreamHack Summer 2008. Av Possan. CC BY 2.0Musik; Button Masher. Av Amber Waldron. Storyblock Audio.Klippare: Emanuel Lehtonen Vill du stödja podden och samtidigt höra ännu mer av Historia Nu? Gå med i vårt gille genom att klicka här: https://plus.acast.com/s/historianu-med-urban-lindstedt. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Rich Kahn, Co-Founder and CEO of Anura, joins the podcast to share his journey from a high school tech enthusiast to a leading expert in digital ad fraud detection. With decades of experience in digital marketing, Rich has built and sold multiple companies, including an Inc. 5000 business, and was honored with the Ernst & Young Entrepreneur of the Year Award for Technology. Now, with Anura, he is on a mission to expose and eliminate fraud in digital advertising, helping businesses protect their ad spend and improve campaign performance.In this episode, you'll discover:From Early Internet Pioneer to Ad Fraud ExpertHow Rich's fascination with ARPANET and early online networks led him to launch innovative digital ventures, eventually culminating in Anura.The Hidden Cost of Ad FraudHow fraudsters—including organized crime syndicates—exploit programmatic advertising, costing businesses billions annually.How Anura Detects and Prevents FraudThe difference between general invalid traffic (GIVT) and sophisticated invalid traffic (SIVT), and why most fraud detection solutions fall short.The Real Impact on Brands and AgenciesWhy 25–50 percent of programmatic ad traffic is fraudulent and how companies unknowingly waste millions on non-human impressions.How to Protect Your Business from Ad FraudRich shares practical strategies for brands and agencies to detect fraud, optimize their ad spend, and demand accountability from ad platforms.Building a Resilient Business in Digital MarketingLessons from Rich's entrepreneurial journey, from bootstrapping businesses to navigating industry shifts and staying ahead of fraudsters.Rich's Top Tips for Businesses and MarketersDon't hire friends—business and personal relationships don't always mix.Always validate your marketing data—bad data leads to bad decisions.Set up a retained earnings account to fund growth opportunities without external capital.Connect with Rich and Learn MoreWebsite: AnuraLinkedIn: Rich Kahn
It’s history day on N Is For Networking! We learn about the development of IPv6 directly from Bob Hinden, one of the pioneers who made it happen. Bob discusses his journey from early work on ARPANET to his significant contributions to IPv6. We also cover the transition from IPv4, the challenges faced during IPv6’s creation,... Read more »
It’s history day on N Is For Networking! We learn about the development of IPv6 directly from Bob Hinden, one of the pioneers who made it happen. Bob discusses his journey from early work on ARPANET to his significant contributions to IPv6. We also cover the transition from IPv4, the challenges faced during IPv6’s creation,... Read more »
Vice Chairman of Parler and designer of the new Parler platform, Bryan Ferre joins the program to discuss the need for a paradigm change in how we live. We discuss the damaging role of Universal Income and discuss realistic alternatives. Along the way we entertain new ways of living and we share the true history of blockchain.Learn more about the opportunity to purchase a Parler Node at https://join.optio.community/6FQDhc
Your body's fat could predict Alzheimer's disease up to 20 years ahead of symptoms, plus a 74-year-old bird might be a mom again. And, on This Day in History, we look back at ARPANET and how it led us to the internet we know today. Hidden fat predicts Alzheimer's 20 years ahead of symptoms | ScienceDaily Wisdom, The World's Oldest Bird, Lays Egg At 74 Years Old After Finding New Mate | IFLScience Wisdom: World's oldest known wild bird lays egg at '74' | BBC Albatross - Description, Habitat, Image, Diet, and Interesting Facts | Animals Network ARPANET - Packet Data, Networking, Internet | Britannica A Brief History of the Internet | Stanford Contact the show - coolstuffcommute@gmail.com Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Parler Creator, Bryan Ferre, Discusses Who Really Created Blockchain, ARPANET, and Our Reality - SarahWestall.com
How did PEZ candy come to be? Why are Mexicans so into anime? Does every costume deserve candy on Halloween? If you had a time machine would you kill Hitler or something more productive? Where was the internet invented? Kyle and Jheisson answer these questions and more as they dive into the history of PEZ, the Crocs marathon world record, the Flintstones, and the history of the Internet!The students at Wiki U have been drinking Magic Mind every morning to jumpstart their day and get their brains firing on all cylinders! We love Magic Mind because it's filled with all natural ingredients that help you focus on the things you need to get done and the things you WANT to get done. The first thing you should cross off your list today is getting a subscription to Magic Mind. For a limited time Wiki U listeners can get 20% off a one time purchase or subscription by using the promo code Wikiuni20 at checkout at the link below!https://magicmind.com/WIKIUNI20 TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@wikiuniversity YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCmPDDjcbBJfR0s_xJfYCUvwInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/wikiuniversity/Music provided by Davey and the Chains TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@wikiuniversity YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCmPDDjcbBJfR0s_xJfYCUvwInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/wikiuniversity/Music provided by Davey and the Chains
Former Tennessee Senator Al Gore was accused by political opponents of claiming to have invented the Internet. We dig into the more complicated truth. Plus, the local news for Oct. 29, 2024 and a deep look at why Nashville's theater community has to get creative to find rehearsal space. Credits: This is a production of Nashville Public RadioHost/producer: Nina CardonaEditor: Miriam KramerAdditional support: Mack Linebaugh, Tony Gonzalez, Rachel Iacovone, LaTonya Turner and the staff of WPLN and WNXP
The introduction of the internet, a pivotal event in the Third Industrial Revolution, was shaped by crucial design and policy decisions made by early internet pioneers. Decisions such as adopting packet-switching for ARPANET, developing TCP/IP, and creating HTML and HTTP
Why FreeBSD Continues to Innovate and Thrive, Why BSD, A BSD person tries Alpine Linux, This message does not exist, Demise of Nagle's algorithm, How Jerry Pournelle Got Kicked Off the ARPANET, and more NOTES This episode of BSDNow is brought to you by Tarsnap (https://www.tarsnap.com/bsdnow) and the BSDNow Patreon (https://www.patreon.com/bsdnow) Headlines Why FreeBSD Continues to Innovate and Thrive (https://freebsdfoundation.org/blog/why-freebsd-continues-to-innovate-and-thrive/) Why BSD (https://michal.sapka.me/bsd/why-bsd/) News Roundup A BSD person tries Alpine Linux (https://rubenerd.com/a-bsd-pserson-trying-alpine-linux/) This message does not exist (https://www.kmjn.org/notes/message_existence.html) Demise of Nagle's algorithm (RFC 896 - Congestion Control) predicted via sysctl (https://undeadly.org/cgi?action=article;sid=20240514075024) How Jerry Pournelle Got Kicked Off the ARPANET (https://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2013/07/how-jerry-pournelle-got-kicked-off-the-arpanet.html) Tarsnap This weeks episode of BSDNow was sponsored by our friends at Tarsnap, the only secure online backup you can trust your data to. Even paranoids need backups. Feedback/Questions Send questions, comments, show ideas/topics, or stories you want mentioned on the show to feedback@bsdnow.tv (mailto:feedback@bsdnow.tv) Join us and other BSD Fans in our BSD Now Telegram channel (https://t.me/bsdnow)
The first ‘spam' email, sent to ARPANET users on behalf of the Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC), landed in Inboxes on 3rd May, 1978. Marketer Gary Thuerk was responsible for the idea - but his execution was flawed, as he inadvertently filled the body of his message with email addresses, overflowing from the To and CC fields. Recipients weren't amused. Some grumbled, others chuckled, but all felt the intrusion... In this episode, Arion, Rebecca and Olly consider whether this e-marketing stumble truly qualifies as ‘spam' in the modern sense; trace the origins of the Monty Python-derived term for unsolicited email; and marvel at the available storage space in the early days of the internet… Further Reading: • ‘Happy spamiversary! Spam reaches 30' (New Scientist, 2008): https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn13777-happy-spamiversary-spam-reaches-30/ • ‘America is Uncle Spam' (Financial Times, 2018): https://www.ft.com/content/59014392-4947-11e8-8c77-ff51caedcde6 • ‘Database: How to send an 'E mail'' (Thames TV, 1984): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=szdbKz5CyhA We'll be back on Monday - unless you join
Before the World Wide Web, savvy computer users were flocking to USENET to participate in discussions on everything from the latest advance in computing to the worst jokes you could imagine. USENET is still around today. So what the heck is it?See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
On today's episode of the Occult Symbolism and Pop Culture with Isaac Weishaupt podcast we'll answer the question: is A.I. the Antichrist?... In Part 2 we'll look at some prophetic statements I made in 2014, review the Chatbots from Microsoft and Google, discuss the original purpose for the Internet from the ARPANet days with Jacques Vallee (*yes the UFO guy) and wrap up the discussion as to whether or not A.I. is the Antichrist!In Part 1 we took a look at the “Godfather of AI” quitting Google due to the risk it imposes, then some figures like Nostradamus, Nietzsche, Jack Parsons and more. We defined the term “Antichrist” and heard from the CEO of Google on a recent 60 Minutes telling us some uncomfortable outlooks!Show sponsors- Get discounts while you support the show and do a little self improvement! 1. HelloFresh- get 16 FREE MEALS PLUS FREE SHIPPING! https://hellofresh.com/ospc16 2. ATTENTION CRYPTO NERDS!!! CopyMyCrypto.com/Isaac is where you can copy James McMahon's crypto holdings- listeners get access for just $13. BetterHelp: This episode is brought to you by BetterHelp. Give online therapy a try and get 10% off at betterhelp.com/illuminatiwatcher and get on your way to being your best self. 4. *Want to advertise/sponsor our show? Email Isaac at IlluminatiWatcher@gmail.com (*business inquiries only please- I'm a one man operation)GRIFTER ALLEY- get bonus content AND go commercial free + other perks:* APPLE PREMIUM: If you're on the Apple Podcasts app- just click the Premium button and you're in! *NO more ads *Early Access *EVERY BONUS EPISODE* PATREON: ad free, all the bonus shows, early access AND TWO OF MY BOOKS! (The Dark Path and Kubrick's Code); you can join the conversations with hundreds of other show supporters here: Patreon.com/IlluminatiWatcher * VIP: Due to the threat of censorship, I set up a Patreon-type system through MY OWN website! IIt's even setup the same: FREE ebooks, Kubrick's Code video! Sign up at: https://illuminatiwatcher.com/members-section/ * *****Want to check out the list of all 160+ bonus shows that are only available on Patreon and IlluminatiWatcher.com VIP Section?… I keep an index right here: https://www.patreon.com/posts/2941405More from Isaac- links and special offers:1. Check out another free podcast I make with my wife called the BREAKING SOCIAL NORMS podcast- it's all about the truther (me) lovingly debating conspiracies with a normie (my wife)! Go to BreakingSocialNorms.com You can get it free wherever you listen to podcasts (e.g. Apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/breaking-social-norms/id1557527024?uo=4). You can get the Uncensored and commercial-free option at Patreon.com/BreakingSocialNorms2. Index of EVERY episode of OSAPC Podcast going back to 2014! https://illuminatiwatcher.com/index-of-every-podcast-episode-of-occult-symbolism-and-pop-culture/3. Signed paperbacks, shirts, & other merch: f4. FREE BOOK: https://illuminatiwatcher.com/how-to-get-free-books/5. Isaac's books for Amazon and narrated for Audible: https://www.amazon.com/author/isaacweishaupt6. Subscribe to my NEW YouTube channel (*with most of the episodes in video form): https://www.youtube.com/@occultsymbolism7. *STATEMENT: This show is full of Isaac's useless opinions and presented for entertainment purposes. Audio clips used in Fair Use and taken from YouTube videos.*ALL Social Media, merch and other links:https://allmylinks.com/isaacwThis show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/3200989/advertisement
On today's episode of the Occult Symbolism and Pop Culture with Isaac Weishaupt podcast we're going to start taking a look at a question that should be on all of humanity's mind: Is A.I. the Antichrist?... Many silicon valley billionaires and elites have been thinking of this question and some are even helping it out!In Part 1 we'll take a look at the “Godfather of AI” quitting Google due to the risk it imposes, then some figures like Nostradamus, Nietzsche, Jack Parsons and more. We'll define the term “Antichrist” and hear from the CEO of Google on a recent 60 Minutes telling us some uncomfortable outlooks!In Part 2 we'll look at some prophetic statements I made in 2014, review the Chatbots from Microsoft and Google, discuss the original purpose for the Internet from the ARPANet days with Jacques Vallee (*yes the UFO guy) and wrap up the discussion as to whether or not A.I. is the Antichrist!NOW UP AD-FREE ON SUPPORTER FEEDS! Free feed gets it Monday!Time is running out to get into the Twin Peaks Grey Lodge for only 2 BUCKS! Join the VIP Section to go ad-free, hundreds of bonus episodes (*including the Twin Peaks Grey Lodge series), two free books and early access! All for only 2 bucks with coupon code ‘CHERRYPIE' that expires June 30th! Go to illuminatiwatcher.com/members-section/ and sign up for the VIP Section- scroll ALL the way to the bottom, sign up for Tier 1 using coupon code “CHERRYPIE” and you're in!Show sponsors- Get discounts while you support the show and do a little self improvement! 1. HelloFresh- get 16 FREE MEALS PLUS FREE SHIPPING! https://hellofresh.com/ospc16 2. ATTENTION CRYPTO NERDS!!! CopyMyCrypto.com/Isaac is where you can copy James McMahon's crypto holdings- listeners get access for just $13. BetterHelp: This episode is brought to you by BetterHelp. Give online therapy a try and get 10% off at betterhelp.com/illuminatiwatcher and get on your way to being your best self. 4. *Want to advertise/sponsor our show? Email Isaac at IlluminatiWatcher@gmail.com (*business inquiries only please- I'm a one man operation)GRIFTER ALLEY- get bonus content AND go commercial free + other perks:* APPLE PREMIUM: If you're on the Apple Podcasts app- just click the Premium button and you're in! *NO more ads *Early Access *EVERY BONUS EPISODE* PATREON: ad free, all the bonus shows, early access AND TWO OF MY BOOKS! (The Dark Path and Kubrick's Code); you can join the conversations with hundreds of other show supporters here: Patreon.com/IlluminatiWatcher * VIP: Due to the threat of censorship, I set up a Patreon-type system through MY OWN website! IIt's even setup the same: FREE ebooks, Kubrick's Code video! Sign up at: https://illuminatiwatcher.com/members-section/ * *****Want to check out the list of all 160+ bonus shows that are only available on Patreon and IlluminatiWatcher.com VIP Section?… I keep an index right here: https://www.patreon.com/posts/2941405More from Isaac- links and special offers:1. Check out another free podcast I make with my wife called the BREAKING SOCIAL NORMS podcast- it's all about the truther (me) lovingly debating conspiracies with a normie (my wife)! Go to BreakingSocialNorms.com You can get it free wherever you listen to podcasts (e.g. Apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/breaking-social-norms/id1557527024?uo=4). You can get the Uncensored and commercial-free option at Patreon.com/BreakingSocialNorms2. Index of EVERY episode of OSAPC Podcast going back to 2014! https://illuminatiwatcher.com/index-of-every-podcast-episode-of-occult-symbolism-and-pop-culture/3. Signed paperbacks, shirts, & other merch: f4. FREE BOOK: https://illuminatiwatcher.com/how-to-get-free-books/5. Isaac's books for Amazon and narrated for Audible: https://www.amazon.com/author/isaacweishaupt6. Subscribe to my NEW YouTube channel (*with most of the episodes in video form): https://www.youtube.com/@occultsymbolism7. *STATEMENT: This show is full of Isaac's useless opinions and presented for entertainment purposes. Audio clips used in Fair Use and taken from YouTube videos.*ALL Social Media, merch and other links:https://allmylinks.com/isaacwThis show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/3200989/advertisement