Podcasts about Fosbury

All of us suffer from constraints in our life. Some are small -- and some can be huge. We should take inspiration from people who have fought huge constraints and broken barriers despite the obstacles in their way -- and sometimes because of them.Welcome to Episode 90 of Everything is Everything, a weekly podcast hosted by Amit Varma and Ajay Shah.In this episode, Amit takes us through a few inspiring stories of how a few pioneers used their constraints to break new ground.TABLE OF CONTENTS: 00:00 Packaging00:13 Intro: We are Stupid AND Creative02:40 Chapter 1: Joni Mitchell Plays Guitar10:09 Chapter 2: Frida Kahlo Won't Be Stopped18:23 Chapter 3: Dr Seuss Has 50 Words32:23 Chapter 4: Fosbury was Not a Flop42:40 Chapter 5: Some More StoriesFor magnificent, detailed, juicy show notes, click here.

Today's podcast highlights coach, author, and educator Dan John. A best-selling author in strength training and fitness, including works such as “Never Let Go”, “Mass Made Simple”, and “Easy Strength Omni-Book.” Dan excels at transforming complex concepts into practical insights and has been a frequent guest on the show. He is one of my most significant influences in how I approach coaching and training. As I move forward in my coaching and training journey, I increasingly appreciate Dan's methods and wisdom in deeper and more impactful ways. If you want to excel at athletics, then you can never, ever, get too far from the actual day-to-day and week-to-week process of training that unfolds over time. On today's episode, Dan talks about navigating the peaks and valleys of performance along with managing daily training and competitive expectations. He also touched on the importance of athlete autonomy, and “figuring it out”, and trends in sports training. Ultimately, Dan speaks to the heart of that consistent, long-haul process by which champions are made, which is the core message of today's episode. Dan is a legend, and it's always fantastic to have him on the show. Today's episode is brought to you by TeamBuildr's Gym Studio and Athletic Development Games. Use the code “justfly25” for 25% off any Lila Exogen wearable resistance training, including the popular Exogen Calf Sleeves. For this offer, head to: Lilateam.com TeamBuildr is an online software for coaches and trainers. Use the code “JUSTFLY” for a free 30-day trial of the TeamBuildr software. For a Gym Studio 14-day free trial, head to gymstudio.com View more podcast episodes at the podcast homepage. Main Points 4:09- Exploring Diverse Fitness Trends 11:42- Efficient Power Curl: Simple Strength Training Boost 18:50- Enhancing Grip Strength with Sandbag Cleans 23:41- Navigating Progress Peaks in Strength Training 25:45- Unexpected Strength Breakthroughs in Weightlifting Journey 30:21- Five Sets of Five 33:47- Navigating Peaks and Valleys in Training 40:28- Navigating Ups and Downs in Training Journeys 43:24- Transition from Functional Movements to Bodybuilding 47:54- Foundational Principles for Enhanced Athletic Performance 51:03- Evolution of Training Methods in Athlete Development Quotes (00:16:47) "I think the overhead squat and the power curl are probably two of the best discus throwing exercises there are. Power curl, I can teach you in seconds." - Dan John (00:20:34) "One of the problems, at least in my world, is that we often think that, you know, if a leads to b and b leads to c, then, well, let's drop b and just go a to c. And it doesn't always happen. Sometimes when you're trying to accomplish something, you still have to stick with all the steps in the system." - Dan John (00:27:46) "George Sheehan in his run, in one of his books, Doctor Sheehan on Running, I think it is. You know, he talks about how athletes live in the pure present. We have no past, we have no future. They're like. And he equates poets, artists, children and the elderly. They all live in the pure present. There is no, there's no yesterday, there's no tomorrow." - Dan John (00:32:57) "Those workouts that are the, you just get in, you do your sets and reps, you walk out the door, you salute yourself for that effort. I actually think those are the ones that make champions." - Dan John 01:00:45 “One of the things a lot of athletes start to do is they turn off. Because if I give you everything, then I'm your wizard, I'm your Gandalf, your Merlin, I'm your Moses, I'm your prophet, I'm the answer to all your questions. But what makes an athlete great is when they go, what made Dick Fosberry great in the high jump? What made him great? Well, he thought for himself to the point that his coach at Oregon State, Frank Morris, did everything he could to stop Fosbury from drinking, from jumping that way. And then later, of course,

If at first you don't succeed, try again.  A common sentiment, but particularly relevant for athletes, and one Hamish Kerr is familiar with.  The Olympic high jump gold medallist told Mike Hosking that his first attempt at the Fosbury flop left him with a bloody nose, as he hit his nose against his knee on the way over.  Kerr's come a long way since that first jump, and now his goal is to leap 2.4 meters – four centimetres higher than his medal winning 2.36 meters.   “For me it's just about getting stronger and faster and that's something we really worked on this year,” he told Hosking.  “Probably the most we've done of that in my whole career, and that's, that's why I've done so well.”  The world record is 2.45 meters, and if he continues the way he does, Kerr thinks the goal is within reach.  “If I have another four years of that, then there's no reason why I wouldn't be getting better.”  LISTEN ABOVE See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

We discuss the incredible interactions of near-infrared light with life on earth, how organisms have evolved to harness this light, light:mitochondria interactions, consequences for human health of removing infrared light in modern built environment and much, much more.Robert Fosbury is an honorary professor at University College London and Emeritus Astronomer at the European Southern Observatory. He has applied his astrophysics background to matters of light & biology interaction with fascinating insights and perspectives.SUPPORT the Regenerative Health Podcast by purchasing through the following links: 

In 214 of Anecdotally Speaking, listen to hear how Richard Fosbury used innovation to defy all odds and win a gold medal in the high … The post 214 – Jumping to New Ideas – Richard Fosbury appeared first on Anecdote.

Shownotes: Olympische Sportfreak: De Spelen van Mexico 1968: 300 studenten vermoord, CIA, Bob Beamon, Fosbury flop, racisme en Zoetemelk! (Jurryt van de Vooren)meld je aan als volger bij jouw streamingsdienst zodat je automatisch de volgende afleveringen zal ontvangen.Jurryt van de Vooren : Sportgeschiedenis.nl

La Jacuzzi l’ha inventata Candido Jacuzzi, lo zampirone l’ha inventato Gian Battista Zampironi, il motore diesel l’ha inventato Rudolf Diesel. E il metodo Fosbury? Non l’ha inventato Fosbury. In questa puntata vi racconteremo la storia che ha rivoluzionato il mondo del salto in alto, ma che continua a portare il nome dell’inventore sbagliato errore storico? Mah, diciamo più furto dell’idea di una minorenne, ma detta così sembra eccessivamente cattiva.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Scott is an expert in optics and has focussed his attention on quantifying the health effects of natural sunlight. With over 35 years of experience in the industry, Scott has unparalleled knowledge about how light interacts with systems. Scott is now a world leader in the optics of the human body and how light interacts with life.Bob is an emeritus astronomer at the European Southern Observatory and an honorary professor at the Institute of Ophthalmology at University College London (UCL). He is an integral part within the Institute of Ophthalmology at UCL with his unique perspective on light and its interactions with the earth's atmosphere. His work with Professor Glen Jeffrey has paved the way for a new understanding of how light, particularly in the NIR range, interacts with the body. His physics background has proved to be indispensable in understanding sunlight and how biological systems have evolved to use it.Listen to Our Previous Conversations:Robert Fosbury: Light-Life InteractionsScott Zimmerman: Melatonin & The Optics of The Human BodyRobert Fosbury & Scott Zimmerman: Light as The Foundation of HealthFollow Bob & Scott's Ventures:Scott's LightbulbsBob's Flikr PageFollow Me:WebsiteSubstackConsultationInstagramYoutubeTwitter/XSpotifyAppleLinktree

This week on The KOKO Show the boys bask in the ethereal light of back-to-back Wallabies victories over the willing Welsh, with the main focus being getting lit and talking Schmidt. As the Wallabies remain on pace for complete rugby world domination, the crew also find some time to break down the other ‘BIG DAWG' Internationals from across the weekend, which saw the All Blacks pants England, Ireland put the Boks on the rocks and the Arigies fry up the French. With all this global footy lovin' going on, we thought it would be fitting to bring in a guest that has faced all these foes and has come out the other side still baby faced and bushy tailed. This fella has played over 90 caps for Wales, he is a Six Nations Champion and has represented the Lions on six occasions. He is the headgear wearing hottie, the Bancyfelin bruiser and the vixen from the Valleys, it is of course Jonathan ‘Fox' Davies. Plus, thanks to our headline sponsor Polo Ralph Lauren brought to you by our beautiful friends at Myer, the lads are looking luminous, luscious and quite simply lovable in another stylish installment of ‘Match Fit'. We know we are too generous, but when you think we couldn't fit any more into this bloody show, we somehow find enough room to squeeze in the world's greatest pie and a little bit of Quiz action. That's right thanks to Four'N Twenty for sponsoring the KOKO Quiz and not only do they make pies that are 100% Aussie Beef, they are also 100% bloody delicious.So, instead of taking a long walk off a short jetty, just throw on your most luxurious activewear, Fosbury flop onto your favourite ottoman and just let the dulcet tones of four half pissed lunatics try and tell you what happened this week in the world of rugby. That's right, it's time for Kick Offs and Kick Ons. Timecodes: 00:00 - Show Intro 01:10 - Polo Ralph Lauren and Four'N Twenty sponsorship plugs02:38 - Intros for the boys 05:43 - Recap of the crew's week13:00 - Huge public response to Hugo sining last week15:02 - Rugby Round Up: Wallabies v Wales Game 222:47 - Prof talks about how Joe Schmidt is a calming influence23:42 - Introduce Jonathan Fox Davies27:16 - Best game in Jonathan Davies' career28:30 - Jonathan getting picked over Brian O'Driscoll29:53 - Swoop has Brian O'Driscoll's last Lions jersey 32:37 - Every team loves playing in Wales33:27 - Jonathan Davies on the current state of Welsh Rugby38:00 - Jonathan Davies wants to play Super Rugby44:47 - The KOKO Quiz brought to you by Four'N Twenty54:12 - Farewell for Jonathan Fox Davies 55:32 - Live Show plug at Wallabies v Georgia game57:02 - Holiday Swoop's Hot Spots - Paddington 58:32 - Wallaroos v Black Ferns review 59:47 - ‘Match Fit' brought to you by Polo Ralph Lauren01:05:39 - Socials and merch plug - KOKO Website 01:06:51 - Northern Hemisphere Legends/Losers01:07:27 - Ireland v South Africa review 01:16:34 - All Blacks v England review01:21:09 - Argentina v France review 01:24:01 - Other International Test match scores01:28:12 - Final thoughts01:32:16 - Close of the showBig thanks to Polo Ralph Lauren for their support and remember you can buy everything you saw on the show from you local MYER or online - https://www.myer.com.au/b/Polo%20Ralph%20LaurenBUY YOUR KOKO MERCHANDISE RIGHT NOW - www.kickoffsandkickons.comMake sure you follow us on all socials:INSTA: @kickoffskickonsTWITTER/X: @kickoffskickonsYOUTUBE: @kickoffsandkickonsTIKTOK: @kickoffskickonsIf you do want to talk about sponsorship or anything business related then please do get in touch with us info@shtn.com.au. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Powerlifters use techniques to milk every last kilo out of their bench press, including wide grips, tightly wound wrist wraps, leg drive, and – the most hated technique in the comment section – an arched-back to reduce the range of motion. Indeed, it can get so heated in the comments it likely even influenced an IPF rule change last year. But how many kilos does an arch really give you? How many bench pressers did this rule change impact, and was there really a need for the rule changes? Further, why do we apply a different standard for what is considered “cheating” to different lifts or athletic movements, like technical manipulation in high jump, or weightlifting? In this episode you'll get the full complement of the Iron Culture themes: we discuss the current culture around the IPF rule change and contemporary perspectives on arched bench press, the history of the clean and press in Olympic weightlifting up to 1972 which has some very interesting parallels, and finally a recently published study which attempted to quantify how much an arch increases bench press 1RM. 00:00 Intro to an episode about when Powerlifting was Powerlifting 03:33 The good old IPF and their regulations 08:40 The bench press rule change 15:23 The motivating factor for the rule change 20:01 Trexler's technique and thoughts on the rules Barbend article: https://barbend.com/ipf-bench-press-rule-change-2023/ 26:22 The history of Olympic weightlifting and Powerlifting and the change in rules 38:39 The Fosbury flop and the perception of different movements and innovations 44:52 Athletes finding ways to maximise performances within rules  57:16 A recent study on arching in the bench press Bartolomei 2024 Flat-Back vs. Arched-Back Bench Press: Examining the Different Techniques Performed by Power Athletes https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38551927/ 1:05:38 The nature of the fragile ego and the final point on the perspective of the spectator

Stiga släpper kantiga racketar och många skrattar. Så brukar vi människor reagera när någon vill utmana gängse normer. Det pratar vi om i veckans avsnitt.Vi pratar även internationell padel. Blicken är riktad mot årets första FIP – men vi tar även upp skämtet att ingen ännu vet om och var EM ska spelas.

Wow! How exciting to start off the year with such an impactful interview! Bobbi was diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes in October 2021 with an A1c of 17.8. Right away, she knew that she needed to make some major changes. She immediately cut out sugar and adopted a low-carb diet. Then, in January 2023, she found intermittent fasting. Also, around that time, she met her now partner, Keith. Keith is a big influence in the intermittent fasting community and he helped her to adopt this lifestyle. Through diet and IF, Bobbi has been able to get her A1c down to 6.3, which is just amazing. In addition, she has been able to lose around 50lbs. Just an incredible story! I hope you enjoy it!

Explore the depths of ancient wisdom and innovation on "Unlocking Ancient Wisdom: The Way of Innovation with Kaihan Krippendorff and Aidan McCullen."

On this day in 1968, Dick Fosbury used a revolutionary high jump technique to win a gold medal at the Mexico City Olympic Games. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Nella ginnastica Italia protagonista con Cassina e Raffaeli.

Scott Zimmerman is an expert in optics and has focussed his attention on quantifying the health effects of natural sunlight. With over 35 years of experience in the industry, Scott has unparalleled knowledge about how light interacts with systems. Scott is now a world leader in the optics of the human body and how light interacts with life.-Robert Fosbury is an emeritus astronomer at the European Southern Observatory and an honorary professor at the Institute of Ophthalmology at University College London (UCL). He is an integral part within the Institute of Ophthalmology at UCL with his unique perspective on light and its interactions with the earth's atmosphere. His work with Professor Glen Jeffrey have paved the way for a new understanding of light, particularly in the NIR range, interacts with the body. His physics background has proved to be indispensable in understanding sunlight and how biological systems have evolved to use it.-Scott's LightbulbsBob's Flikr Page-Follow My WorkWebsiteConsultationInstagramYoutubeSpotifyApple PodcastsLinkedin

Cette semaine dans Belle Trace, Florence Masnada reçoit Marc Maury, ancien décathlonien, consultant athlétisme et présentateur d'événements sportifs.Marc Maury raconte comment il est devenu décathlonien (03:50). Après le football, il remporte des cross country en Algérie. "Je devais faire de l'activité, j'étais un peu hyperactif, sinon à la maison c'était l'enfer." Après être devenu champion d'Algérie cadet puis junior, Marc Maury explique comment sa curiosité sur une piste d'athlétisme l'a emmené au décathlon.Après cette première aventure dans l'athlétisme (15:30), Marc est affecté à Paris comme professeur. Après trois ans d'enseignement, l'envie de découvrir autre chose est plus forte. Il commence sa carrière d'animateur puis de mannequin. "J'ai gagné en une journée comme mannequin, un an de salaire de professeur", déclare-t-il.Recruté par Charles Biétry à Canal plus, Marc se souvient de l'évolution de la télévision dans le sport (28:40). Le speaker des grandes compétitions explique comment il prépare les interviews d'après match. Il partage une anecdote où, avant la course, il savait que Asafa Powell avait perdu juste en voyant son expression.Pour finir, Marc Maury partage ses souvenirs (45:20) avec les différents grands champions comme Bolt, Federer, Nadal et bien d'autres.Bonne écoute !Ecoutez d'autres épisodes de Belle Trace :Florian Jouanny : "Je passe mes vitesses avec la tête, tout a été pensé pour la performance"Jean-François Lamour : "Je descends du podium et Jacques Chirac me met la main sur l'épaule"Stéphane Caristan : " Je me suis demandé si sans artifice ce serait compliqué de réussir"Vous pouvez réagir à cet épisode sur notre page Twitter.Retrouvez tous les podcasts d'Eurosport ici.Animation : Flo MasnadaProduction : Eurosport Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

Madeleine Bunbury is an English equine artist who paints life portraits of horses and ponies. At just 28, Madeleine is aspiring to follow in the footsteps of her idol, George Stubbs, aligning with other great equine painters, such as Agasse, Munnings and Herring. Madeleine was born on the island of Mustique in 1995, one of four children; her mother Lotty is a fashion designer and her father Michael, a doctor. She grew up in an an island playground and from an early age sketching and painting was instinctive, and more accessible than riding ponies which she dreamed of. It was when she began her education at boarding school in England that she was able to indulge herself and become a horse-mad teenager taking every opportunity to ride. Her love of horses became the catalyst to her initial plan to become a veterinarian but she had to abort that idea once she failed the required science exams. It was then that she decided on a career in art with the confidence that this was something for which she had a talent. With the guidance of an artistic uncle and aunt, Madeleine spent three years studying traditional portraiture at the Charles Cecil Studios in Florence, Italy. It was to prove the launching pad for her to embark on a career as an equine artist and she was soon making a livelihood painting horse portraits. Madeleine can be found either in her studio in Fosbury, Wiltshire or traveling to horses across the UK and around the world. Her latest project is a series of 16 breeds of British native horses and ponies which, as well as producing very large paintings will also be a coffee book, and perhaps a documentary.Playlist: Eminem- Lose Yourself (Gets me out of bed and revved for the day)Claude Debussy - Claire de lune (The first piece I learnt to play on the piano)Chopin - Nocturne no.20 in C-Sharp Minor (so melancholy and beautiful to paint to) Destiny's Child - Independent Woman (after various boyfriends let me down this is how I feel) Favorite artists:Isabella WatlingDaisy SimsHilditch HenriettaAbel-SmithEleanor Cardozo Madeleine's website: https://www.bunburyart.com/Instagram: @bunbury_equine_art Host: Chris StaffordFollow @theaartpodcast on InstagramThis show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/4769409/advertisement

Madeleine Bunbury is an English equine artist who paints life portraits of horses and ponies. At just 28, Madeleine is aspiring to follow in the footsteps of her idol, George Stubbs, aligning with other great equine painters, such as Agasse, Munnings and Herring. Madeleine was born on the island of Mustique in 1995, one of four children; her mother Lotty is a fashion designer and her father Michael, a doctor. She grew up in an an island playground and from an early age sketching and painting was instinctive, and more accessible than riding ponies which she dreamed of. It was when she began her education at boarding school in England that she was able to indulge herself and become a horse-mad teenager taking every opportunity to ride. Her love of horses became the catalyst to her initial plan to become a veterinarian but she had to abort that idea once she failed the required science exams. It was then that she decided on a career in art with the confidence that this was something for which she had a talent. With the guidance of an artistic uncle and aunt, Madeleine spent three years studying traditional portraiture at the Charles Cecil Studios in Florence, Italy. It was to prove the launching pad for her to embark on a career as an equine artist and she was soon making a livelihood painting horse portraits. Madeleine can be found either in her studio in Fosbury, Wiltshire or traveling to horses across the UK and around the world. Her latest project is a series of 16 breeds of British native horses and ponies which, as well as producing very large paintings will also be a coffee book, and perhaps a documentary.Playlist: Eminem- Lose Yourself (Gets me out of bed and revved for the day)Claude Debussy - Claire de lune (The first piece I learnt to play on the piano)Chopin - Nocturne no.20 in C-Sharp Minor (so melancholy and beautiful to paint to) Destiny's Child - Independent Woman (after various boyfriends let me down this is how I feel) Favorite artists:Isabella WatlingDaisy SimsHilditch HenriettaAbel-SmithEleanor Cardozo Madeleine's website: https://www.bunburyart.com/Instagram: @bunbury_equine_art Host: Chris StaffordProduced by Hollowell StudiosFollow @theaartpodcast on InstagramEmail: hollowellstudios@gmail.com

Programa Nº 18 de la cuarta temporada del Podcast Tirada Larga presentado por Angel (@Contadordekm) y Victor (@Premarathon). Hoy se hace periodismo de investigación (leer varios artículos de la wikipedia) para esclarecer temas de los que sólo tenemos la versión oficial: J.A. Samaranch, Fosbury, la FEDME y el origen de la tractorismo. En la web www.tiradalargapodcast.com podrás dejar monedas y encontrar toda la información sobre lo que hemos ido hablando (sin tener ni idea) durante el programa. Puedes seguirnos en twitter @tirada_larga e Instagram @Tirada_Larga_Podcast y si tienes una historia sobre correr sin tener ni idea puedes compartirla enviando un audio (cortito) o texto al e-mail tiradalargapodcast@gmail.com.  Cada miércoles, sobre las 19:00, nos encontrarás en Twitch dónde charlamos/entrevistamos a gente que NO habla sin tener ni idea y donde puedes tirarnos el PRIME a la cara. Si te falta contenido, hay un onlyflans cada 3/4 programas que puedes escuchar en Spotify por dos monedas (https://anchor.fm/tirada-larga/subscribe)  Lo de la publicidad: si quieres una cuña rápida de tu carrera de pueblo o  quieres que hablemos maravillas de tu localidad, aquí puedes contratarnos, si lo que quieres es contratar una campaña publicitaria, casi mejor que leas esto primero. Nos puedes escuchar todos los sábado (si no rompemos algo) en tu plataforma de podcasts favorita: Spotify , Apple Podcast, Ivoox, Amazon Music, Podimo, Google Podcast o Youtube (entrevistas). Los presentadores: Angel https://www.instagram.com/contadordekm/ Victor https://www.instagram.com/premarathon/ Intro musical: Living Nightmare by Snowflake

Mexico City, Olympic Games, 1968. The stadium is packed, the wider world looks on via TV coverage. Everywhere there's an air of expectancy but also an awareness that at such high altitude it's going to be hard for athletes to beat their best. Records are there to be broken, you have to hope for something special.And in the high jump event they weren't disappointed. The record for men's high jump had hovered around 2.23 m for several years. But a young 21-year-old was about to change that; Dick Fosbury, representing the USA broke this with a height of 2.24 m and won the gold medal.  The ‘Fosbury flop' as it quickly became known opened up new possibilities for the sport; within ten years it had become the dominant mode for all jumpers and helped move the world record to 2.45 m which was set in 1993 by Javier Sotomayor. These days anyone attempting the high jump has come to resemble the ‘fish flopping on the deck of a boat' as one newspaperman described Fosbury's Mexico model.What Fosbury's feat reminds us of is the power of reframing in innovation. Innovation can take place anywhere along a continuum from doing what we do better — incremental — to doing something completely different — radical. And it can cover what we offer the world — product or service — and the ways we create a deliver that offering — process. That gives us plenty to keep us busy in our innovation day.But sometimes we can reframe, look at what we're doing in a different way, identify novel approaches.You can find a transcript of this podcast hereAnd a video version hereIf you'd like to explore more innovation stories, or access a wide range of resources to help work with innovation, then please visit my website here.You can find a rich variety of cases, tools, videos, activities and other resources - as well as my innovation blog.Or subscribe to my YouTube channel here

Stefan Fatsis, Josh Levin, are joined by Slate's Alex Kirshner to talk about Fairleigh Dickinson's huge upset over Purdue and Princeton's run to the Sweet 16. Then, ESPN's Alden Gonzalez comes on to discuss the historic matchup between the USA and Cuba at the World Baseball Classic. Finally, author David Epstein assesses the legacy of high jumper Dick Fosbury, who invented the immortal Fosbury Flop. Fairleigh Dickinson (2:18): Did the Knights pull off the biggest upset in college basketball history? World Baseball Classic (23:59): What it meant for the Cuban national baseball team to take the field in Miami.  Fosbury (42:41): Where does it rank on the list of all-time sports innovations? Afterball (1:01:32): Josh on Ole Miss women's basketball coach Yolett McPhee-McCuin. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

En los Juegos Olímpicos de 1968, Dick Fosbury se atrevio a competir con una técnica innovadora y cambió para siempre la historia del salto vertival. Este es el tributo y el recuerdo para uno de los campeones olímpicos más nfluyentes en la historia de su disciplina.

Kid News This Week: Aukus nuclear-powered submarine project upsets China, Valentine asteroid heading to Earth in 2046, the 95th Academy Awards show without the red carpet and the Fosbury Flopper who revolutionized the high jump dies – we share his inspiring story, plus the Fab Facts quiz and World Wrap of other news making headlines around the world!

Sport, disparition d'un monument de l'athlétisme, Dick Fosbury l'homme qui révolutionna le saut en hauteur avec le célèbre saut en arrière, appelé le « flop » ou tout simplement le Fosbury

John Canzano talks to author and sportswriter Bob Welch about the life and legacy of Dick Fosbury, creator of the Fosbury Flop that completely revamped the high jump and the world of track and field. Fosbury was a state of Oregon native and Oregon State athlete. He passed away at the age of 76.

durée : 00:04:02 - Vizo sport - Alex revient sur un nom incontournable du milieu sportif et plus particulièrement du saut en hauteur, le regretté Richard Fosbury.

En esta Sobremesa del programa La Cafetera recordamos la figura de Dick Fosbury, el atleta ahora fallecido, que revolucionó al atletismo y

The man who changed the high jump forever, Dick Fosbury, has passed away aged 76. The American developed an alternative technique to the 'scissor kick' used by athletes, going on to win a gold medal at the 1968 Olympics. His unique way of clearing the bar soon became the technique all high jumpers used and the term Fosbury Flop was coined. David Ford spent time with Fosbury as his acupuncturist. He talks to Jesse about him and his legacy.

En este episodio de Voces del Deportes hablamos sobre la convocatoria de la Selección Colombia para los amistosos en Asia, los problemas de visado del equipo haitiano Violette para entrar a Estados Unidos para la Concachampions y el fallecimiento del ex atleta de salto alto Dick Fosbury.This show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/4232891/advertisement

Il ne reste plus que 500 jours avant l'ouverture des Jeux Olympiques de Paris. Légende de l'athlétisme, Dick Fosbury est décédé à 76 ans. Le final du Tour de France 2024 a été dévoilé hier et il promet du spectacle. Erling Haaland et Manchester City accueillent le RB Leipzig ce soir en Ligue des champions. Retrouvez toute l'actualité sportive dans votre Flash L'Équipe. 

In 1968, American high jumper Dick Fosbury introduced a new way to compete in the high jump. His new technique worked so well that he won an Olympic gold medal, and within a few years, everyone used his method of high jumping. Fosbury's innovation isn't the only one in the track and field world. There have been several other technique innovations in other events, which have been shown dramatically improve performance. Learn about the track and field techniques which would smash world records (if they weren't illegal) on this episode of Everything Everywhere Daily. Subscribe to the podcast!  https://link.chtbl.com/EverythingEverywhere?sid=ShowNotes -------------------------------- Executive Producer: Darcy Adams Associate Producers: Peter Bennett & Thor Thomsen   Become a supporter on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/everythingeverywhere Update your podcast app at newpodcastapps.com Discord Server: https://discord.gg/UkRUJFh Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/everythingeverywhere/ Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/EverythingEverywhere Facebook Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/everythingeverywheredaily Twitter: https://twitter.com/everywheretrip Website: https://everything-everywhere.com/everything-everywhere-daily-podcast/ Everything Everywhere is an Airwave Media podcast. Please contact sales@advertisecast.com to advertise on Everything Everywhere. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Robert Fosbury is an emeritus astronomer at the European Southern Observatory and an honorary professor at the Institute of Ophthalmology at University College London. For 26 years, Bob worked at the European Space Agency as part of their collaboration with NASA on the Hubble Space Telescope. He joined this initiative in 1985, more than 5 years before launch. During the latter part of this period, Bob served on NASA's Ad Hoc Science Working Group and ESA's Study Science Team as they developed the instrument concepts for the James Webb Space Telescope, the next-generation space observatory.-Since then, Bob has become an integral part within the Institute of Ophthalmology at UCL with his unique perspective on light and its interactions with the earth's atmosphere. His interdisciplinary contributions to this team at UCL have lead to new hypotheses developing, particularly surrounding the beneficial effects of specific wavelengths of red and near-infrared light and the detrimental effects of the narrow spectrum blue light that is emitted from modern lighting fixtures and appliances. Bob and the team at UCL with Professor Glen Jeffrey are working hard to explore and share the damaging effects of blue spectrum light from artificial sources. Commonplace, most artificial lighting peaks at wavelengths that have devastating effects on the energy productions systems of the cell, the mitochondria, as well as having negative effects on circadian rhythms.-Follow Bob's WorkFlickrPublication on Reindeer VisionHubble DocumentaryCartwheel Galaxy-Follow My Work:WebsiteConsultationInstagramYoutubeSpotifyApple PodcastsLinkedin

在喜马拉雅已支持实时字幕关注公众号“高效英语磨耳朵”获取文稿和音频词汇提示1.flop 跳高2.biomechanics 生物力学3.intuition 直觉4.prior 之前5.straddle 跨坐6.curve 曲线7.acceleration 加速8.rotates 旋转9.leaping 跳跃10.arches 拱起11.experimenting 实验原文Fosbury FlopAmerican athlete Dick Fosbury devised the high jump technique known as the “Fosbury Flop”.His new technique revolutionized one of the oldest events in track and field competition.While Fosbury never broke the world record using his new technique，other high jumpers were inspired by his gold medal at the 1968 Summer Olympic Games in Mexico City，where he introduced his new jumping technique.Fosbury was born in 1946 in Oregon and went to Oregon State University.He won the gold medal in the Olympic Games at the very young age of 21.It was assumed that his odd-looking new method for clearing the bar was based on a careful study of the physics and biomechanics of high jump technique.However，Fosbury claimed it was the product of pure intuition.Prior to Fosbury's invention，most high jumpers used a “straddle” technique.In this older style of jumping，the front leg led the jumper up and over the bar in a face down position.Fosbury's technique involves approaching the bar in a curve with a last second acceleration.Then，at the point of take-off，the body rotates，positioning the back to the bar and leaping backwards.The head faces the sky as the body arches over the bar with the mid-body and legs trailing behind.Fosbury had begun experimenting with a new technique when he was only sixteen years old.In a meet in 1968 in which Fosbury used his new technique，a local newspaper's headline read，“Fosbury flops over the bar”.Thus，the name of the newly invented technique was born.Since Fosbury's competitive days，his technique has been widely copied.Once experienced jumpers mastered the technique，records started to fall in the sport，due mostly to the Fosbury Flop，but also to better equipment and running surfaces.Dick Fosbury will always be known for his revolutionizing of the sport of high jump.翻译背越式跳高美国运动员迪克·福斯伯里发明了被称为“背越式跳高”的跳高技术。他的新技术彻底改变了这项田径比赛中最古老的项目。虽然福斯伯里从未用他的新技术打破世界纪录，但其他跳高运动员运受他启发在1968年墨西哥城夏季奥运会上获得的金牌，他在那里介绍了他的新跳高技术。1946年，福斯伯里出生于俄勒冈州，进入俄勒冈州州立大学学习。他在21岁时就获得了奥运会金牌。人们认为，他这种看起来很新奇的跳高方法是基于对跳高技术的物理和生物力学的仔细研究。然而，福斯伯里声称这纯粹是直觉的产物。在福斯伯里的发明之前，大多数跳高运动员都使用“跨坐”技术。在这种老式的跳跃方式中，跳跃者的前腿引导着跳跃者以面朝下的姿势越过横杆。福斯伯里的技术是以最后一秒的加速度接近曲线中的杆。然后，在起跳点，身体旋转，将背部定位到杆上并向后跳跃。头部面向天空，身体拱起，身体中部和腿部伸展跟在后面。福斯伯里在16岁时就开始试验这种技术。1968年，在一次会议上，福斯伯里使用了他的新技术，当地一家报纸的发言人在头条上写着，“福斯伯里跳过了横杆”。于是，新发明技术的名字（福斯伯里式跳高，即背越式）诞生了。自从福斯伯里参加比赛以来，他的技术已被广泛复制。一旦有经验的跳高运动员掌握了这项技术，这项运动的记录开始下降，主要原因是背越式跳高，但也得益于更好的设备和跑步场地。迪克·福斯伯里将永远以他对跳高运动的革命性而闻名。

Les gestes du sport (ep.4) - le Fosbury flop

In this episode, Rachel Johnson shares the story of high jumper Dick Fosbury. At first, he was branded a failure in the eyes of the media and sporting community but then something remarkable happened. Taking inspiration from one man's journey from failure to success, how can we also find a way when it looks like there is no way? How can we turn our ‘flops' into successes? PiXL Pearls are short reflections on life and leadership, in schools. They are here to inspire, encourage, motivate, and challenge. The PiXL network spans almost 3,000 schools across key stages 1-5. We collaborate, share best practice, and equip leaders throughout the educational system. Series 2 and 3 are presented by Rachel Johnson, CEO of PiXL, and Series 1 was presented by Founder-Director Sir John Rowling. They both draw on literature, life, and experience in leadership to explore different elements of what it is to be a good leader and how we can become even better leaders, both in and out of schools. PiXL Pearls Podcast is a We Are In Beta Production. Subscribe now to download every episode directly to your phone automatically. PiXL Pearls is a We Are In Beta production. For more information visit: https://www.pixl.org.uk/

How do Olympic high jumpers make such incredible heights? By manipulating their center of gravity using the famous Fosbury flop, of course!In this episode, Will and Ian discuss the concept of Center of Mass/Gravity using the 2020 Olympic Games.The video example discussedTopics Include:Homemade jinglesOur favorite mascotTwo incredible sportsmenIan's CRV 2Fast2Furious experiencesWill's love for novelty toys from Cracker BarrelConfirmation of MCU Phase 4 physics???

Di che cosa parliamo quando parliamo di innovazione? Dietro questa parola abusata vi sono percorsi concreti, tortuosi e affascinanti. Dalla forchetta al kalashnikov, dal mouse allo spaghetti western, alcune delle intuizioni che hanno cambiato le nostre vite emergono da processi collettivi, non riconducibili all'intuizione di un genio isolato. Svolte non solo tecnologiche ma anche concettuali, come la sequenza QWERTY sulle tastiere che tutti usiamo quotidianamente, o come il salto alla Fosbury. Dalla cultura alla tecnica, dallo sport al cinema e alla tavola, il racconto curioso e istruttivo - a cui anche il pubblico del Festival della Mente sarà invitato a contribuire - di piccole svolte diventate grandi cambiamenti.

In our 43rd "Deming Lens" episode, host Tripp Babbitt shares his interpretation of wide-ranging aspects and implications of Dr. Deming's theory of management. This month he looks at Management Theories contrasting Frederick Taylor and the work of W. Edwards Deming. Show Notes [00:00:14] Deming Lens - Episode 43 [00:03:30] Taylorism Flaw #1 [00:03:57] Neo-Taylorism [00:05:24] Taylorism Flaw #2 [00:06:23] Taylorism Flaw #3 [00:07:28] Taylorism Flaw #4 [00:09:22] Taylorism Flaw #5 [00:10:18] Taylorism Flaw #6 [00:11:37] Taylorism Flaw #7 [00:12:46] Taylorism Flaw #8     Transcript Tripp Babbitt: [00:00:14] In this edition of The Deming Lens will complete a series on mangement theories contrasting Frederick Taylor and the work of W. Edwards Deming.   Tripp Babbitt: [00:00:31] Hi, I'm Tripp Babbitt, hosts of the Deming Insitute podcast, and in the last Deming Lent, the 40 second episode, I talked about Frederick Taylor and scientific management and things of that sort and in essence, brought in the book Deming's Profound Changes, coauthored by one of the members of the Deming Institute Advisory Council. And it's an important book. I've mentioned it before in previous episodes. I've talked about this, but I think it's from the perspective of how a manager thinks. I think it's helpful to understand kind of what's being taught in universities and colleges versus what Dr. Deming was talking about. And I I my personal admiration for this book has to do with being able to differentiate between what Frederick Taylor did in the early nineteen hundreds and what Dr. Deming proposed in his system of profound knowledge that he wrote in 1992. And we're talking about, to me, a huge difference. In matter of fact, the the difference I use are a way to describe it is the Fosbury flop.   Tripp Babbitt: [00:02:10] You know, Fosbury the Fosbury flop is the way everybody does the high jump today. But when it first came out in 1968 at the Olympics, it was something very new.   Tripp Babbitt: [00:02:22] So I want to walk through these things as this episode be a little bit longer. But I want to walk through these eight things that I ended the last episode with. And they are were the flaws of Taylorism. And I'm going to take you through kind of three levels for each of these things.   Tripp Babbitt: [00:02:42] One is how Taylor the floor of Taylor's thinking what the book Deming's for Profound Changes talks about in terms of what's referenced as Neo Taylorism, which is kind of taking what Taylor did in the nineteen hundreds or early nineteen hundreds and the way management has kind of played it out in today's world. And I think these things, even though that means profound changes, a little bit dated now too, it's still relevant and kind of where we've been and kind of how Dr. Deming saw things. So let's just start and I'll walk through these and you'll see some recurring themes in here, as I did years ago.   Tripp Babbitt: [00:03:30] And I've focused in on some of the overlaps of the thinking as far as the flaws go. So let's just jump into them. So the first one was belief in management control as the essential precondition for increased productivity. That was the flaw associated with Frederick Taylor and his thinking and the way this is played out.   Tripp Babbitt: [00:03:57] You think in terms of Neo Taylor ism or the way it's played out today is that your boss is your customer. I mean, they are the ones that, in essence, tell you what to do on a daily basis. They're the ones who judge the judge and jury of your work. And this is pretty widespread, I would say, in most organizations.   Tripp Babbitt: [00:04:22] Now, the way Deming viewed things was that management job is not to control and that management's job was to coach and to provide methods and tools. And for me, the emphasis on methods really struck home because Method's gives you a way to achieve what you're trying to accomplish. And not many there's not a lot of focus in management today on methods. It's more what type of leader are you? Do you have emotional intelligence and things of that sort? And what I think is really missing is then I think those are soft skills. And I'm not saying they're not important.   Tripp Babbitt: [00:05:05] They're very important. But there's also the hard skills or what I reference is hard skills, which are methods to do things like innovate and, you know, the ways to look at data and ways to develop your synthetic thinking. But we'll talk about some of those a little bit later.   Tripp Babbitt: [00:05:24] The second thing was belief in the possibility of optimal processes and. The needlestick way, and I think you could even go back to Frederick Taylor himself, and so there was always one best way to do something and everybody's always looking for best practices or, oh, the competitor did this. And we've got to copy that because there have been so successful. Sometimes they're been successful with it. But the impression is that what they're doing is cool.   Tripp Babbitt: [00:05:52] And so we've got to copy what somebody else is doing. And Deming was his advocacy was for there was always a better way and that that mindset always exists. There's always a way to do something better. And for instance, technology can help us see new things, but it doesn't necessarily have to do them or accomplish them. So that's one of the big differences then between Deming and Taylor,   Tripp Babbitt: [00:06:23] The third thing, a narrow view of process improvement. Now we get into this subject of synthetic thinking a little bit. And Neil Taylorism is management reorganizations were use our use today as a substitute for actual improvement or in the book they reference process improvement. I think it's just improvement in general. But this is in essence, what the book said from a Neotel Ristic standpoint. Dr. Deming was about process improvement. And I like to distinguish greatly at this point something I've learned over the years, which is process improvement.   Tripp Babbitt: [00:07:07] The way that it's looked at today is far less effective than systemic improvement. And this means that you have to become a synthetic thinker and understand that the whole is greater than the sum of its parts and that many organizations are, you know, the same process improvement and Deming.   Tripp Babbitt: [00:07:28] But what we really want to do in order to become effective is achieve systemic improvement to make the hole better. So this is a good Segway into the fourth thing, which is low level sub optimization instead of total system improvement.   Tripp Babbitt: [00:07:50] So there's this recurring theme now of systemic improvement, or I like to reference synthetic thinking that you need in order to improve an entire system.   Tripp Babbitt: [00:08:04] And the Neo-Tayloristic view is and we see this in organizations all the time, probably have it in your organization, are quotas or targets for individuals and teams and departments and things of that sort. So this is, again, breaking the parts down and trying to optimize each of the pieces within an organization that you cannot contrast that against Dr. Deming's thinking and the story or the way to convey this. I think best that people can kind of get is when he used an orchestra and that an orchestra.   Tripp Babbitt: [00:08:42] Doesn't have a group of 150 primadonnas trying to play their own solos. They all have their moment or maybe they never have their moment, but they all know what their role is within trying to create music that's pleasing to the ear. And and along with that, because you are able to get hundred and fifty people to cooperate in order to achieve the aim of creating beautiful music, you know, everybody wins.There's a satisfaction associated with the whole system operating well.   Tripp Babbitt: [00:09:22] The fifth thing is the cause of defects in a Tayloristic mindset is people, you know, oh, we've got to find somebody to blame and you know, somebody and this is very, very prevalent within organizations. And so because of that and the Neil Taylor mistake or the more modern application of Taylor's thinking, we see all of these worker motivation schemes. And this this can be distinguished from Deming and synthetic thinking or systems thinking that defects are from the system and not people. And Dr. Deming's favors a famous percentage was 94 percent of the defects are from the system and only six percent is from the individual or special special causes or events.   Tripp Babbitt: [00:10:18] The sixth thing, separation of planning and doing neo Taylorism again, separation of management from the workplace in the front line is still even today. Unless you're a small organization, will see management will be on some floor, maybe upper floor of an organization and they don't really come into contact with the people, you know, where the work is being done or with front line people.   Tripp Babbitt: [00:10:46] And Dr. Deming's view was that there was a need for management to understand the processes that they manage, that you needed to understand the work that you were managing as opposed to just collecting data on what's going on. And that we need to value the contribution and value created by the worker and that's that is a huge shift for a lot of organizations, is just that we're talking in terms of culture change. This is one of the things that I see organizations struggle with a lot, because that isn't the reason I became an executive or a manager, was to, you know, be around, you know, the front line workers doing stuff. I can manage them with the data and, you know, process charts and things of that sort.   Tripp Babbitt: [00:11:37] The seventh thing, failure to recognize systems and communities in the organization that Neotel Ristic or modern view of this has worked is viewed individually instead of collaboratively.   Tripp Babbitt: [00:11:54] And this whole collaboration piece when we talked in terms of the orchestra comes to mind when you think of the systems which you're involved with. And there's a couple of things I pull from this. One is abdication of management's responsibility for the welfare of employees. We see this played out from an artistic standpoint.   Tripp Babbitt: [00:12:17] We get layoffs, we get rank and yank, although we're seeing less of that nowadays and at its height during the 90s and even the early 2000s. And, you know, we got to contrast this with Dr. Deming's view of, you know, what is best for society, what is the greater good, what is really the aim here where everybody has an opportunity to win?   Tripp Babbitt: [00:12:46] The eighth thing is view of workers as interchangeable by bionic machines. The need tailor a Ristic view is failure to recognize the major effect of the system on an employee's performance. And this is one of the things I think when I'm discussing with management or executives about their organization and their performance is that they because they're not synthetic thinking is something you have to develop within your organization. I don't think you just say you need to understand the whole and people get that they need excuse me. They need to do it. Why? They're looking at their own organization. And so Deming is a promote promotes basically that the system, as I mentioned before, the 94 percent is what you need to focus in on.   Tripp Babbitt: [00:13:44] And and by focusing in on the six percent or even just the individual, you're going to lose out what gains that you get of systemic thinking. And we hit this again, we're talking in terms of process improvement problem. And I and I wish Dr. Deming would have used the word systemic improvement process improvement. Again, we're talking about analytic thinking, of kind of trying to optimize the pieces, the individual, the team, and not understanding how the whole might gain and that sometimes different departments may need to give a little as opposed to get.   Tripp Babbitt: [00:14:30] And sometimes the way this plays out from a Neo-Tayloristic standpoint is we have profit centers and maybe not. You might go so far I'd never heard it talked in terms of, you know, the individual must show profit. But certainly in terms of individual departments, I've heard of, you know, H.R. departments and finance departments have to show that they're profitable. I don't understand the thinking there because they're they're they're enablers. They are not the ones that create value for the customer.   Tripp Babbitt: [00:15:06] But those are the eight things. Deming's view was very different.   Tripp Babbitt: [00:15:11] And that's why I say that Dr. Deming and his system of profound knowledge is a huge leap from where Frederick Taylor taken us and how we've made it.   Tripp Babbitt: [00:15:26] Tried to make it better by what we're teaching in universities and, you know, Dr. Deming's message still isn't broadly taught at universities and certainly far less understood by universities and what what he did. And so this offers huge opportunity, I think, for an organization, you know, trying trying to compete in a global marketplace. This that is this week's Deming Lens. And we will talk to you next month.   Tripp Babbitt: [00:16:01] Hi, this is Tripp Babbitt. One way that you can help the Deming Institute. And this podcast is by providing a rating on Apple podcasts. If you have additional comments, you can reach me at tripp@deming.org.  

Saverio Cuoghi conversa con Paolo Venturi, Direttore AICCON e Ideatore Giornate di Bertinoro per l'Economia Civile#Categorie nuove | scoprire facendo | palestra di apprendimento | trasformazione | forza Terzo Settore | Olanda e il calcio Totale | inclusività | cambiare il futuro | Fosbury | nuove consapevolezze | discontinuità | dimensione trasformativa | Digitale | cambiare il contesto | Terzo Settore emergentista | relazione fra attori | beni comuni | Scomporre & Ricomporre | destrutturare e ri-socializzare | Rischiare e osservare | misura del valore | Purpose economy | dare valore al bene | bene all’inizio | desideri#Podcast Ufficiale de “Le Giornate di Bertinoro 2020 ” World-Making | Per un nuovo protagonismo del Terzo Pilastro”https://www.legiornatedibertinoro.itSaverio Cuoghi | https://www.linkedin.com/in/saveriocuoghi/ | www.innovazione2020.itPaolo Venturi | https://www.linkedin.com/in/paolo-venturi-433a152b/

.. cela va sans dire pour beaucoup d’entre vous (à travers un sondage effectué sur mon compte Twitter..) et pour l’ensemble - enfin disons au moins une majorité - des aficionados de foot à travers la planète je suppose.. perso je pense comme eux mais après si l’on gratte un peu, si l’on se penche sur les dires et autres études des grands spécialistes du sujet (le sujet des génies..), on réalise que c’est peut-être plus complexe que ça.. sans compter quelques tweets qui ont ici et là fait vaciller certains de mes appuis, car entre talent, fut-il immense ici, et génie, la marge est parfois c’est vrai très étroite.. finalement.. Alors entre Panenka et Fosbury, et en passant par le fil à couper le beurre - Maradona, Cruyff etc.. aussi.. - nous allons décrypter tout cela, et à la toute fin de ce podcast 74 Bis vous verrez bien si ma position a évolué et de fait si mon verdict a finalement changé.. ou pas..

Ein Mann produziert einen Flop und landet damit einen echten Hit. Geht nicht? Doch, das geht. Nämlich dann, wenn der Mann Dick Fosbury heißt. Der besaß nämlich in den 1960ern die Frechheit, entgegen aller Gepflogenheiten, die Hochsprunglatte nicht etwa per Straddle zu überqueren, also bäuchlings, sondern mit seiner ganz individuellen Technik - rückwärts. Und das auch noch so gut, dass er am Ende den Olympiasieg einsackte. Damit war nach den Olympischen Spielen in Mexico-City im Hochsprung nichts mehr so, wie es vorher war. Malte Asmus erzählt, wie Fosbury den neuen Sprungstil kreierte und dann abräumte....

Ein Mann produziert einen Flop und landet damit einen echten Hit. Geht nicht? Doch, das geht. Nämlich dann, wenn der Mann Dick Fosbury heißt. Der besaß nämlich in den 1960ern die Frechheit, entgegen aller Gepflogenheiten, die Hochsprunglatte nicht etwa per Straddle zu überqueren, also bäuchlings, sondern mit seiner ganz individuellen Technik - rückwärts. Und das auch noch so gut, dass er am Ende den Olympiasieg einsackte. Damit war nach den Olympischen Spielen in Mexico-City im Hochsprung nichts mehr so, wie es vorher war. Malte Asmus erzählt, wie Fosbury den neuen Sprungstil kreierte und dann abräumte....

Ein Mann produziert einen Flop und landet damit einen echten Hit. Geht nicht? Doch, das geht. Nämlich dann, wenn der Mann Dick Fosbury heißt. Der besaß nämlich in den 1960ern die Frechheit, entgegen aller Gepflogenheiten, die Hochsprunglatte nicht etwa per Straddle zu überqueren, also bäuchlings, sondern mit seiner ganz individuellen Technik - rückwärts. Und das auch noch so gut, dass er am Ende den Olympiasieg einsackte. Damit war nach den Olympischen Spielen in Mexico-City im Hochsprung nichts mehr so, wie es vorher war. Malte Asmus erzählt, wie Fosbury den neuen Sprungstil kreierte und dann abräumte....

Ein Mann produziert einen Flop und landet damit einen echten Hit. Geht nicht? Doch, das geht. Nämlich dann, wenn der Mann Dick Fosbury heißt. Der besaß nämlich in den 1960ern die Frechheit, entgegen aller Gepflogenheiten, die Hochsprunglatte nicht etwa per Straddle zu überqueren, also bäuchlings, sondern mit seiner ganz individuellen Technik - rückwärts. Und das auch noch so gut, dass er am Ende den Olympiasieg einsackte. Damit war nach den Olympischen Spielen in Mexico-City im Hochsprung nichts mehr so, wie es vorher war. Malte Asmus erzählt, wie Fosbury den neuen Sprungstil kreierte und dann abräumte.

Investments, Musikrecht und die Welt der Musikverlage – in dieser Episode des Redfield Podcasts geht es um moderne Geschäftsmodelle in der Musikwelt und um eine neue Idee mit Songrechten Geld zu verdienen. Podcast-Gast Lukas Rössler erzählt im Gespräch mit Alexander Schröder von seiner frisch gestarteten Finanzierungsplattform Whaaat, die Künstler mit Investoren zusammenbringt. Der Österreicher ist selber als Musiker und Produzent aktiv. 2010 gründete er die New Media Agentur Fosbury und arbeitete bereits mit Kunden wie Nike, Sony Music Austria, Oracle oder Strabag Real Estate. Im Sommer 2020 geht es mit den Finanzierungen für die ersten Künstler über die neue Plattform los. Investoren wie Musikfirmen, aber auch Fans des Künstlers können Anteile an Songrechten erwerben; die Tantiemen erhält der Künstler. So wird die Vision einer modernen Finanzierung, die der Künstler dann zum Beispiel für Marketing, PR oder Produktionen nutzen kann, mit dem traditionsreichen Verlagsgeschäft kombiniert. Langfristig will Rössler verschiedene Modelle rund um Whaaat aufzubauen und über das Verlagsrecht hinausdenken. Im Podcast geht es außerdem um interessante Startups im Musikbereich, um effektive Datenerfassung und wie man das Musikverlagsgeschäft generell modernisieren könnte. www.whaaat.eu www.redfield-records.de

When Dick Fosbury won the 1968 Olympic Gold Medal in the High Jump, he did it using his innovative method: the Fosbury Flop. His new technique revolutionized how jumpers have summited the bar ever since. Fosbury's teammate at Oregon State, John Radetich, became the first person to set a world record using the Fosbury Flop. Radetich jumped 7 feet, 4.75 inches in 1973 to break the Indoor World Record, and three years later set another record, jumping 7 feet, 6 inches.Radetich went on to work for 29 years at the Albany Boys & Girls Club and coached various track & field teams as well. He may call his athletic prowess "just jumping over a stick," but we talk about what he learned from his athletic career and how everything would have been different had he not come to Oregon State.----------My friend and former OSU wrestler Christian Robertson helped me set up this podcast. He has one of his own as well, called "It's All About Who You Know." Check it out on Apple here:https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/its-all-about-who-you-know/id1463724633

durée : 00:47:33 - L'Œil du tigre - par : Philippe Collin - C'est un inventeur bien plus important que tous ceux qui l'ont précédé dans l'histoire du saut : l'américain Dick Fosbury, né en 1947, a donné son nom à son style devenu norme. - invités : Fanny Wallendorf, Nicolas Herbelot - Fanny WALLENDORF, Nicolas HERBELOT

Conocemos a Candelaria Fernández, "Candy", ex - capitana del Sporting, que ha fichado por el Rodiles Fútbol Sala. Hablamos con la presidenta del Oviedo Moderno, Beatriz Álvarez sobre la nueva liga Reto Iberdrola. Atletismo con Ana Amelia Menéndez y la pionera Sagrario Aguado, primera española en saltar Fosbury que vivió los mejores momentos del Estadio Vallehermoso que se reinaugura el 25 de agosto. Y compartimos la 24° victoria de Mara Santos en el Descenso Internacional del Sella.

Conocemos a Candelaria Fernández, "Candy", ex - capitana del Sporting, que ha fichado por el Rodiles Fútbol Sala. Hablamos con la presidenta del Oviedo Moderno, Beatriz Álvarez sobre la nueva liga Reto Iberdrola. Atletismo con Ana Amelia Menéndez y la pionera Sagrario Aguado, primera española en saltar Fosbury que vivió los mejores momentos del Estadio Vallehermoso que se reinaugura el 25 de agosto. Y compartimos la 24° victoria de Mara Santos en el Descenso Internacional del Sella.

Conocemos a Candelaria Fernández, "Candy", ex - capitana del Sporting, que ha fichado por el Rodiles Fútbol Sala. Hablamos con la presidenta del Oviedo Moderno, Beatriz Álvarez sobre la nueva liga Reto Iberdrola. Atletismo con Ana Amelia Menéndez y la pionera Sagrario Aguado, primera española en saltar Fosbury que vivió los mejores momentos del Estadio Vallehermoso que se reinaugura el 25 de agosto. Y compartimos la 24° victoria de Mara Santos en el Descenso Internacional del Sella.

Conocemos a Candelaria Fernández, "Candy", ex - capitana del Sporting, que ha fichado por el Rodiles Fútbol Sala. Hablamos con la presidenta del Oviedo Moderno, Beatriz Álvarez sobre la nueva liga Reto Iberdrola. Atletismo con Ana Amelia Menéndez y la pionera Sagrario Aguado, primera española en saltar Fosbury que vivió los mejores momentos del Estadio Vallehermoso que se reinaugura el 25 de agosto. Y compartimos la 24° victoria de Mara Santos en el Descenso Internacional del Sella.

Few people can say they’ve made it to the Olympics, let alone win gold and change the way their sport is played forever. This week’s episode we hear from Dick Fosbury, 1968 High Jump Gold Medalist and creator of the signature move the “Fosbury Flop.” Listen in to hear how he overcame challenges to become one of the most influential athletes in track and field history and how he landed in Sun Valley, Idaho.   Visit Sun Valley, Idaho: visitsunvalley.com Purchase Dick’s new book, The Wizard of Foz: Dick Fosbury's One-Man High-Jump Revolution: amazon.com/Wizard-Foz-Fosburys-High-Jump-Revolution/dp/1510736190 Experience the Southern Idaho lifestyle: southernidaho.org/lifestyle Explore career opportunities in Southern Idaho: southernidaho.org/jobs

Dag lieve luisteraars,   een prachtige aflevering met Pieter Daelman. Beluister hoe hij zijn carrière startte in de televisiewereld, naar het nemen van een sabbatjaar en zichzelf hier volledig heruit te vinden tot het oprichten van het bedrijf Bedenk.   Met bedenk helpen ze organisatie future proofed te zijn door de interne innovatiekracht te versterken.    Heb echt veel geleerd uit deze podcast over wat innovatie en creativiteit echt betekent.  Waarom dit zo belangrijk is.    Antwoorden op volgende vragen, zal je zeker krijgen na het beluisteren van deze aflevering.   Wat heb je nodig om elke dag wendbaar te zijn als organisatie?  Wat zijn de regels van een creatief proces?  Hoe kan je een innovatiecultuur in kaart brengen en dit bijsturen? Door welke drie fases ga je in dit creatief proces? Waarom is het belangrijk je oordeel uit te stellen? Hoe kan je creatief zijn in een organisatie? Waarom geeft werken met interne expertise empowerment?  Wat heeft veiligheid te maken met creativiteit? Wat zijn de voorwaarden om als organisatie innovatief te zijn? Wat zijn de uitdagingen van de organisatie Bedenk?    En uiteindelijk antwoordt hij op de vraag: Waar is Fosbury het beste kantoor van heel België?   Als laatste legt Pieter uit waarom zijn belangrijkste advies is om dagelijks iets nieuws te doen. Hoe dit je leven kan veranderen en wat dit voor hemzelf heeft betekent tijdens zijn sabbatjaar.      Meer weten over Bedenk! ?  http://www.bedenk.be

MUST LISTEN Vandaag stel ik jullie voor aan Peter Stroobants.  Je mag je verwachten aan een  eerlijk en authentiek levensverhaal dat mij echt heeft geïnspireerd.    Peter is advocaat maar vooral ook een creatieve innovatie ondernemer met veel gevoel voor humor.  Dé expert hier in Fosbury als het gaat over arbeidsrecht.  Peter is na zijn studies direct zijn eigen kantoor gestart.  In deze podcast kom je te weten wat hij toen heeft gedaan om zijn kantoor tot op dag vandaag succesvol te maken en te houden.    Na zijn echtscheiding vorig jaar heeft Peter zijn kantoor hier in Fosbury succesvol weten verderzetten.  De voordelen van samenwerken met ondernemers hebben hem hierin geholpen alsook het thuis gevoel dat hij in Fosbury ervaart.  Nooit wil hij nog terug naar vroeger. Werken in Fosbury is de toekomst.     Als laatste ontdek je in deze podcast deelt Peter zijn geheim over hoe hij ervoor zorgt dat er altijd tijd genoeg is. En welke rol Fosbury hierin speelt.    Veel luisterplezier.            Meer over Peter weten? www.ontslagavies.be 

Beluister Tom zijn ontzettend boeiend levensverhaal. Tom vertelt hoe hij zijn carrière startte als goochelaar startte en nu werkt als sales directeur bij Odot.   Werken bij Fosbury is een groot cadeau voor hen. Probeer maar eens slecht gezin binnen te komen bij Fosbury? Dat is gewoon onmogelijk volgens hem!   In deze aflevering vertelt Tom over hoe hij het ouderschap combineert met zijn huidige job, hij deelt zijn hoogte en diepte punten in het leven en met veel passie vertelt hij over hun bedrijf Odot.    Waar ze het vertrouwen in een branche herstellen waar op dit moment veel wantrouwen heerst . Een organisatie in de start up fase die zal pionieren op vele gebieden.

Johan Anthierens - Noise Solutions Waarom hij ondernemers net betaalt zodat ze gecoacht kunnen worden?   Van een typische corporate carrière naar een succesvolle ondernemer . Johan Anthierens vertelt een stukje van zijn levensverhaal.  Door zelf zijn huis te verbouwen en hierbij bezorgdheid te hebben voor geluidsoverlast, ontdekte hij een gat in de markt en richtte hij het bedrijf Noise Solutions dat nu al 15 jaar bestaat.    Tijdens de podcast heb ik Johan leren kennen als iemand die  houdt van verandering en variatie, van uitdaging en persoonlijke ontwikkeling.  Nieuwe projecten voeden hem.  Daarom hij heeft enkele jaren geleden het besluit genomen om ondernemers in de start up fase te betalen zodat hij hen kan coachen. Het biedt hem uitdaging en stilt zijn honger naar nieuwe projecten.  Omgekeerde wereld, ik had hier zelf nog nooit van gehoord. Dus als ge u bevindt in de start up fase en je wil graag begeleid worden, voel je welkom en klop zeker bij hem aan.   In deze podcast beantwoorden we volgende vragen. Wat doe je als jouw bedrijf een  gouden kooi voor je is? Hoe ga je om met angst als ondernemer? Waarom is de spreuk: Kill your darlings belangrijk als ondernemer?  Wat is Johan zijn geheim om succes te hebben als ondernemer?   Hoe ga je om met een gezond goed draaiend bedrijf en toch op honger zitten als het gaat over uitdaging?    Op het einde van de podcast vertelt hij nog hoe hij ooit zijn bedrijf gestart heeft op de zolderkamer van zijn huis, naar een ontzettend mooi kantoor in Mortsel tot hij Stijn op een event hoorde vertellen over Fosbury. Een omgeving en visie die volledig matchte met datgene waar Johan in gelooft. Hij kon het gewoon niet beter treffen.       Meer weten over Noise Solutions? Of wil je Johan contacteren?  johan@noisesolutions.be  https://www.noisesolutions.be

Vandaag stel ik jullie met veel plezier voor aan Serge Hannecart.  Oprichter van Life en mede eigenaar van Fosbury & Sons.  Hij heeft er bewust voor gekozen om geen CEO te zijn van zijn eigen bedrijf om bezig te kunnen zijn met met opportuniteiten zien de creatieve kant van Life.    In deze podcast hoor je meer over  wat het concept van de Watt Toren (Working apart, thinking together) precies is,  hoe Serge Stijn en Maarten heeft uitgedaagd groot te denken en dat de komende jaren alle Europese steden wil verbinden met Fosbury.    Ondanks Life een heel goed kantoor had, zijn ze heel bewust verhuisd naar Fosbury & Sons om het hele concept zelf te ervaren. Ook voor hem uit de comfortzone gaan.  Luister hoe de  visie en filosofie van Fosbury Life heeft uitgedaagd om als organisatie het nieuwe werken ook te integeren in hun organisatie.    Ontdek wat de grootste uitdaging is voor Serge, welke kleine droom hij nog koestert en hoe hij kijkt naar werken en ontspanning meer in balans te brengen. 

Todos lo sabemos, 1968 es un año de contrastes, de luces y sombras. Los momentos sombríos son tenebrosos y los pasajes luminosos son prístinos. En octubre se conmemora otro acontecimiento relevante en el devenir histórico de México: la inauguración y celebración de los XIX Juegos Olímpicos en la cd de México. Un evento que marca un parteaguas en la historia visual de nuestro país. Primeros Juegos Olímpicos que contaron con una identidad visual, de la que derivó una robusta arquitectura visual. Un equipo de trabajo con múltiples integrantes bajo el comando del Arq. Pedro Ramírez Vázquez, en el siguiente nivel de mando estuvieron tanto el Arq. Eduardo Terrazas como la Sra. Beatrice Trueblood, coordinando a un gran grupo de creativos. Entre ellos tenemos a José Luis Ortiz Téllez, un joven diseñador, egresado de esta casa de estudios, de gran sensibilidad y capacidad de trabajo, mano derecha del famoso Lance Wyman, quien ventajosamente se ha adjudicado la autoría total de la creación de dicha identidad visual. Logo Mexico 68 Oficialmente conocidos como los Juegos de la XIX Olimpiada, fueron celebrados en la Ciudad de México, entre el 12 y el 27 de octubre de 1968. La Ciudad de México había sido candidata a los Juegos Olímpicos en 1956 y en 1960, sin embargo, en ambas ocasiones las candidaturas fracasaron al recibir un mínimo de votos durante la elección. Finalmente en 1963, la ciudad fue seleccionada como sede de los Juegos. A partir de ese momento se constituyó formalmente el Comité Organizador que trabajó de manera conjunta con el Gobierno Mexicano y algunas secretarías de Estado en la organización de los Juegos. Estos fueron los primeros Juegos organizados por un país en vías de desarrollo, por una nación hispanohablante y los primeros realizados en Latinoamérica. Fueron también los terceros celebrados en otoño y los primeros con controles antidopaje y de género. Además, hizo su aparición la Olimpiada cultural. Cuenta con grandes hitos dentro de las gestas olímpicas, como el del atleta norteamericano Bob Beamon, quien impuso una monumental marca en el salto largo con 8.90 metros. O el caso de Dick Fosbury, quien creó una innovadora técnica llamada “Fosbury flop”. Otro de ellos es el del corredor de velocidad norteamericano James Hines, quien en la final de los 100 metros planos logró un registro oficial de 9.95”. A decir del Comité Olímpico Internacional la candidatura de México a los Juegos Olímpicos de 1968 “se basó fundamentalmente en las instalaciones existentes y la experiencia en eventos anteriores”. El Comité Olímpico Mexicano designó en un principio al ex presidente Adolfo López Mateos, pero renunció en 1965 por razones de salud. En su reemplazo se eligió al Arq. Pedro Ramírez Vázquez, cuya visión integral permitió alcanzar niveles nunca antes vistos en la celebración de estos Juegos. El programa olímpico de esa época presentaba 20 competencias, en rememoración a los juegos celebrados en la antigüedad en la península Helénica, el Arq. Ramírez Vázquez propuso la creación de una Olimpiada cultural compuesta también de 20 eventos.

Episodio número 3 de la temporada 2 de la serie Vision Zero Podcast.Con Salvador Carmona y Joaquin Ruiz, y la colaboración de PRLinnovación. Hoy tenemos de invitada a Júlia Díaz, HR-Health & Safety Manager en INECO. EL ROL DEL PROFESIONAL EN SEGURIDAD Y SALUD Perfil en Linkedin de Júlia Díaz: https://www.linkedin.com/in/juliadiazgonzalezcobos/Julia ha escrito varios post en el blog de PRL Innovación y en su perfil de Linkedin, sobre el rol del profesional de la seguridad y salud.Artículo Linchpin: http://www.prlinnovacion.com/eres-un-linchpin-y-no-lo-sabes-elcambioerestu/Blog Francisco Alcaide: http://www.franciscoalcaide.com/2018/09/la-palabra-magica-en-el-mundo.htmlArtículo ¿Porqué lo llaman amor cuando quieren decir sexo?: http://www.prlinnovacion.com/por-que-lo-llaman-amor-cuando-quieren-decir-sexo/Artículo Fosbury: http://prevenblog.com/toma-de-perspectiva-en-seguridad-y-salud-laboral/Linchpins, esperamos vuestros CV's!! ;-)-----------Contacto: Podcast: podcastvisionzero@gmail.comTwitter: @podcast_zeroSalvador Carmona: salvador.carmona@imastres.esJoaquin Ruiz: jruiz@prevencontrol.comPRLinnovación: http://www.prlinnovacion.comGracias a todos y saludos!

Wil je graag ook een gesprek over jouw verhaal en/of het verhaal achter jullie of jouw bedrijf? Mail me dan en plannen we een momentje.  joke.oosters@trust-for-business.com Wil je meer weten over wie ik ben? https://www.trust-for-business.com https://www.linkedin.com/in/joke-oosters-a314216a/          

Vandaag stel ik jullie voor aan Stijn Geeraets, mede oprichter van Fosbury&Sons.  Een prachtige inspirerende werkplek waar nu 153 bedrijven hun kantoor gevestigd hebben. Een plek waar werk, esthetiek en plezier samen komen. Wat kom je te weten in deze podcast? Hoe Stijn en Maarten elkaar hebben leren kennen. Hoe Fosbury&Sons is ontstaan. De visie en filosofie van Stijn die tot leven komt in Fosbury&Sons. Wat er nodig is om creatief en innovatief te zijn. Waarom menselijkheid en duurzaamheid op de eerste plaatst staat bij Stijn.  Hoe het zelfsturend team van Fosbury & Sons werkt. Hoe hij uitkijkt naar zijn vaderschap en wat hij later hoopt uit te leggen aan zijn dochter. De verandering die ze samen met de zonen van Fosbury te weeg brengen in onze maatschappij.  Hoe Stijn zijn persoonlijke crisis heeft bijgedragen aan het ontstaan van Fosbury&Sons.   

Lucas Tieleman richt het ene bedrijf na het andere op: CreatAd voor user generated reclame, 94Wines voor makkelijk herkenbare wijnen, Repudo voor digitale objecten in de reële wereld en Fosbury voor mobile wallet marketing. Daarom praten we met hem over wat een startup succesvol maakt. Waarom was bijvoorbeeld PokémonGo wel succesvol en Repudo niet? Timing is een sleutelfactor.

Di Riccardo GazzanigaVi è mai capitato di provare nostalgia per un momento storico che non avete vissuto? Lo scrittore Riccardo Gazzaniga ci racconta la sua nostalgia per le Olimpiadi di Città del Messico del 1968 e per i personaggi che vi parteciparono, cambiando per sempre la storia delle Olimpiadi e dello sport. Questo è il prologo di una serie in 6 puntate in cui lo scrittore ci racconterà, come in un romanzo, l'intreccio dei fatti e delle vite dei protagonisti di quella incredibile pagina di storia e sport. Iscriviti per essere informato sull'uscita degli episodi a partire dal 4 settembre.

Filip dömer ogärna folk som valt en urspårad livsstil, som till exempel CNN-ankaret Richard Quest som härrom året hittades halvnaken i Central Park med ett halsband rund nacken knuten till sin penis och lite metamfetamin i fickan. Men när det kommer till mer stramt folk, till exempel sådana som kanske inte har lika hög tolerans för Richard Quest:iga-eskapader, de dömer Filip mer än gärna. Och så lite om Ronaldos trekanstsfrisyr, Fosbury-flopp samt Marlon Brandos brevlådeknullande.

Riccardo Gazzaniga ci accompagna in un viaggio nel tempo e nello spazio che ci trasporta nell'anno della grande contestazionea, il 1968, a Città del Messico, duurante le proteste di piazza che fecero da cornice ai Giochi della XIX Olimpiade dell'era moderna, quella dei record, dell'altitudine, delle polemiche e della protesta.

Martijn de Kuijper, founder of Revue. He’s a product guy and his company’s focus is to get your thoughts to people’s inboxes via newsletters. He previously founded Fosbury and Yunoo. Martijn is also a Techstars alum. Famous Five: Favorite Book? – Zero to One What CEO do you follow? –  N/A Favorite online tool? — Intercom Do you get 8 hours of sleep?— No If you could let your 20-year old self, know one thing, what would it be? – “Just keep doing what you’re doing and don’t get distracted by what other people are saying”   Time Stamped Show Notes: 01:30 – Nathan introduces Martijn to the show 02:10 – Revue focuses on personal newsletters like editorial newsletters 02:45 – Revue helps people share their content through newsletters 02:50 – Revue currently has a free and premium model 03:20 – Average customer pay per month is $7 03:45 – Martijn is a listener of The Top 04:10 – Revue was launched in January 2015 04:27 – Martijn started Revue on his own as a side project 04:30 – Martijn was working on the acquisition of Fosbury 04:59 – Martijn shares what Fosbury is about 05:24 – Martijn was in Techstars Texas 05:44 – Team size is 5 06:18 – Fosbury wasn’t earning 07:08 – The money that Martijn received from the assets 07:42 – Martijn used the money from selling Fosbury to start Revue 08:12 – Martijn also sold Yunoo when he was 26 08:30 – The buyer is the software company AFAS from the Netherlands 09:20 – Martijn has raised $350K for Revue in convertible note 09:50 – Terms on the convertible note 10:05 – Revue currently has a thousand paying customers 10:23 – Martijn is currently focusing on growth rather than revenue 10:48 – Revue has 20K registered users at the moment with 10% active users 10:57 – Active users are the ones who send at least 1 email a month 11:27 – Monthly churn 11:35 – No paid CAC 11:49 – Revue has a content marketer 12:24 – Revue is currently sending 2M emails, monthly 12:40 – First year revenue 13:00 – Total 2016 revenue 13:26 – Martijn’s current side project 14:30 – Where Martijn got his marketing ploy idea 16:30 – The Famous Five   3 Key Points: Don’t be afraid to sell your company if it comes down to it. Study and strategize a marketing plan that works and at no cost. Just keep doing what you’re doing and don’t let what others say distract you.   Resources Mentioned: Acuity Scheduling – Nathan uses Acuity to schedule his podcast interviews and appointments Drip – Nathan uses Drip’s email automation platform and visual campaign builder to build his sales funnel Toptal – Nathan found his development team using Toptal for his new business Send Later. He was able to keep 100% equity and didn’t have to hire a co-founder due to the quality of Toptal Host Gator – The site Nathan uses to buy his domain names and hosting for the cheapest price possible. Audible – Nathan uses Audible when he’s driving from Austin to San Antonio (1.5-hour drive) to listen to audio books. The Top Inbox  – The site Nathan uses to schedule emails to be sent later, set reminders in inbox, track opens, and follow-up with email sequences Jamf – Jamf helped Nathan keep his Macbook Air 11” secure even when he left it in the airplane’s back seat pocket Freshbooks – Nathan doesn’t waste time so he uses Freshbooks to send out invoices and collect his money. Get your free month NOW Show Notes provided by Mallard Creatives

On this week's episode, we'll be learning how to think like innovators by exploring the importance of lateral thinking. Among the topics we'll discuss are how lateral thinking can be applied in a business context, what the famous Fosbury flop can teach us about thinking like an innovator, and much more. Joining us on this episode of the podcast is Paul Sloane, author of Think Like an Innovator: 76 Inspiring Business Lessons From the World's Greatest Thinkers & Innovators and How to Be a Brilliant Thinker, among others. Paul was a top salesman with IBM, as well as the Marketing Director, Managing Director, and CEO of various software companies like Ashton-Tate and Mathsoft. Among the many companies who have benefited from Paul's innovation workshops are Nike, Novartis, Microsoft, and Glaxo Smith Kline. Paul is the author of over 25 books on leadership, innovation, lateral thinking, and puzzles, and he specializes in speaking and teaching on lateral thinking and innovation in business. He blogs often on his website at www.destination-innovation.com, where you can also find information on the many books he has written and get your hands on a number of resources like lateral thinking puzzles, an innovation audit and more. Paul Tweets on innovation-related topics regularly at @PaulSloane.  Show Notes Read Paul's blogs on his website: http://www.destination-innovation.com/ Buy Think Like an Innovator on Amazon Follow Paul on Twitter: https://twitter.com/PaulSloane

6 AM - 1 - Vincent is having a Cheat Week; The A&G Summer Games continue; Opening Thoughts. 2 - ; MailBag. 3 - The News with Marshall Phillips. 4 - Jack hates the sound of people eating, and, well, we discover just sounds in general.

Janet's equivalent of the Fosbury flop left US markets nervous ahead of the unscheduled release and positively underwhelmed after it! So where next for the major indices, and let's hope the FED don't flop again in December and finally get off the fence.

The reason why we find writing to be such a tedious task, is because we don't understand the barriers that get in our way. Instead, we write, edit, write, edit — and drive ourselves crazy. One of the ways to get over the barriers is to use the Captain Kirk and Mr Spock method. What is this method all about? Find out in this episode of the podcast. --------------------  Resources To access this audio + transcript: http://www.psychotactics.com/59 Email me at: sean@psychotactics.com  Twitter/Facebook: seandsouza Magic? Yes, magic: http://www.psychotactics.com/magic --------------------   In this episode Sean talks about Part 1: How to use the Captain Kirk and Mr. Spock method of writing Part 2: The power of preparation Part 3: How to decide on your ‘One Word’ Right click here and ‘save as’ to download this episode to your computer.   Useful Resources The Brain Audit: Why Customers Buy And Why They Don’t Article and Audio: Three Unknown Secrets of Riveting Story Telling Live Workshop: How to create amazing stories—and connect them flawlessly to your articles, newletters, podcasts, etc --------------------- The  Transcript   Imagine you’re the athlete who’s trying for the Olympic gold in high jump. You look at the newspapers that day and there is the Los Angeles Times and they’re saying that he goes over the bar like a guy being pushed out off a 30-storey window. Then you flip to the next newspaper which is The Guardian and it says, “He is the curiosity of the team.” Then you pick up the magazine Sports Illustrated and it says, “He charges up from slightly to the left of center with a gait that may call to mind a two-legged camel.” We’re talking about Dick Fosbury here, the guy who first did the Fosbury flop. While all these newspapers and magazines seem to make fun of Dick Fosbury, it’s unlike he had a great opinion of himself either. It’s unlike Dick Fosbury was arguing with their comments because at college someone bet him that he couldn’t get over a leather chair. He couldn’t jump over that leather chair and he said he tried, but not only did he lose his bet but he also broke his hand in the crash landing. In  1968, when he arrived at the Mexico Olympics he was relatively unknown and yet days later he not only captured the imagination of the Mexican public, but also the rest of the world. He sailed over the bar at 2.24 meters, which is 7 feet and 4 inches. It wasn’t that he sailed over because that wasn’t the world record. It’s that he did it by overcoming the obstacle with his crazy jump which was called the Fosbury flop. What’s interesting about the Fosbury flop is that no one ever did that kind of flop before. No one ever tried to get over the bar in that manner. It was considered extremely weird, extremely camel-like and yet today it’s extremely weird to see people jumping over the bar as they did back in 1968. Today the Fosbury flop is the way people jump over a bar at the Olympics in any sports stadium. What Fosbury did was he looked at the obstacle and he said, “Let me get over this in another way because there’s no way I’m going to be able to do it the usual way.” That’s really what this podcast is all about. We’re going to look at writing and why we struggle with writing, why we have these obstacles with writing. If we go about it the way we’ve always done, that doesn’t seem to work for us because you’re going about it the same way that I used to do back in the year 2000 where I would look at the article and then try to write it and then spend a day, spend 2 days writing that article and getting very frustrated and not knowing what was going wrong. We have to look at the obstacle that bar and look at how we can over that bar in a completely different way. That’s what this podcast is going to cover. We’re going to cover 3 things. The first thing is about editing. The second thing is about preparation and the third is about the one word or the one term. As always, we’ll start with the first, which is editing. Part One: Editing I love making a rice dish called biryani. It is a dish meant for kings. It has all of these yummy elements. If you’ve ever eaten a biryani, you know exactly what I mean. Here’s how you go about making a biryani. You have to get all the things together, like spices and the yogurt and other stuff like saffron and ghee, which is a clarified butter. When you get all of those things together, you got some onions. In fact, you got a lot of onions and then you caramelised the onions. When all of that is done you, marinate it. A few hours later it’s time to cook the biryani. I put it all in a dish, which we call handi. You would call it a saucepan. Before I turn on the flame I have to do one very important thing. I have to seal the handi or the saucepan with dough so that it becomes like a pressure cooker and the meat cooks in it and the rice cooks in it and all the flavours cook within it and it’s all sealed you can’t get in. Did you notice the problem? Sure, you did. It was the dough. It sealed the vessel. There is no way to know whether the rice is cooked or the chicken is still raw. The dough prevents me from editing. Editing is the first big obstacle to writing. Why? Because the writer and the editor are 2 completely different people. The writer is like Captain Kirk; you watched Star Trek, didn’t you? The writer is like Captain Kirk and Captain Kirk has all these great ideas. He wants to go where no man has ever gone before and he is a bit out there. Then you have Spock and he needs to be logical and that’s how your editor acts every single time. We have these 2 people, 2 completely different people and they’re at log ahead with each other. What we do when we write is we put both of those people on the same seat. Of course they’re going to fight. Of course they’re going to continuously argue with each other and of course that’s your obstacle, isn’t it? You’re not going to get over that obstacle because you’re treating both of them as the same person when they were completely different. The first thing you’ve got to realise is that it’s not Captain Spock, it’s Captain Kirk and Mr. Spock. You’ve got to start with the writing process and then let it marinate and several hours later you have to bring in Mr. Spock. Just like the biryani, you’ve got to let that marination process take its own sweet time. You probably want to write at one part of the day and then one look at it maybe later in the day or even the next day. This is what I had to do when I first started out. I was not very good at writing. I was not very quick at writing. I would send my article to a friend and a client, whose name is Chris Ellington. Chris would look over it and then fix it and he had a million fixes and then it will come back and then I would send it out again this time to Rochelle. Rochelle would look at all the grammar and fix it and all of this editing process would drive me absolutely crazy plus there was my own creative output as it were. This is the process. There is the writer and the editor. There is this time in between and what we do is we make a Captain Spock out of it. Of course it doesn’t work and there is no reason why it should work, because editing and writing just do not mix. That’s our first-grade obstacle and we have to learn that we’re going to have to do thing differently, do a bit of a Fosbury flop if we want to get over that bar and write great content. This takes us to the second one and the second one is all about preparation. Part 2: Preparation On June 29, 2007, Pixar released a movie about a rat and it was called Ratatouille. It was a story about an inspiring chef called Linguini and her rat called Remy, a rat that loved to cook. Speaker 1: Animation is a very, very complicated business. There’s hundreds of people involved in the actual production. Speaker 2: Many things that we take for granted in real life are difficult to do in the computer. Speaker 3: Pixar is really very good at addressing complex problems. By far, this is the most complicated clothing that we’ve done. Speaker 4: We went to a special sequence on that with the character with Linguini jumps into the sand to try and save Remy. He comes out dripping wet and we had to try and figure out a way to get that look when claw sticks to the skin and you can see just a little bit of colour coming through it. Speaker 5: What do we do? We abused one of our poor coworkers. We make him dressed up in a chest outfit. We doused him with water and we filmed him. What does it look like? We’re on the clothing. Can you see it through to his skin? Where do the chips come off from his face? It’s our excuse to abuse coworkers actually not to think about it. Sean D’Souza: What you just heard in that clip is preparation, preparation and more preparation. The reason why Pixar has to do so much preparation is because they’re not amateurs. They have million dollar budgets and of course they’re wasting a lot of money. They’re also wasting time and they’re wasting energy. When you think about it, that’s exactly what we do when we sit down to write. We don’t create that moment of preparationor really that hour of preparation and that’s how you know the difference between an amateur and a professional. The amateur just sits down and begins to write. They sit at their computer and they decide, “I’m going to write an article today. I’m going to create a podcast today. I’m going to create a webinar.” The professional on the other hand sits down to plan. I was to listening to a podcast earlier today and there was this interview between Brian Orr and Jeff Brown. Jeff worked in the radio industry for many, many years and now he has his own podcast. He was talking about how people just show up on podcast and they start to ask questions and they don’t prepare and how all the preparation is critical. If you listen to Ira Glass on This American Life and he’s on videos on YouTube, he talks about the preparation and how finding the stories takes half the week even though they have so many people in their staff. We think, “We’re just business people. We just have to write an article. Let’s sit down and write,” and that’s not how professionals work. You are a professional when you sit down to write and therefore you have to sit down to plan. What are you going to plan? You’ve got to figure out what topic are you going to cover, what one word are you going to cover, what 3 sub-topics you’re going to cover or at least how you’re going to structure the article, how you’re going to structure this podcast. When I sit down to do this podcast, most of the work is done outside. Admittedly, the music takes a lot of time but the podcast takes only about 45 minutes to record and it takes me an hour and a half to put all the details together, sometimes longer. I’ll go to the cafe. I’ll sit don and I’ll put it all together. You can see a photograph of that. I’ll put it in the show notes. It takes a lot of preparation to create something that is more than average and that’s what professionals do. This is the obstacle that we run into. It’s not I don’t try to beat the system. I try it. I’ll show up here at 4am and I’ll try to record a podcast and then it’s 4:30 and 4:45 and then 5:30. It’s very, very frustrating and so I’ve given up. I’ve totally given up. Every time I want to record a podcast I will go to the cafe and sit there and plan. I don’t have the time that’s why I go and that’s why I plan and this is what professionals do. They plan before they execute. They get the ingredients, put the biryani in the fridge, let it marinate and then later they are cooking it. Amateurs? We just go there and we cook it right away as if something magical is going to happen. We’ve looked at 2 main obstacles and the first one was editing, the fact that we get Captain Spock together instead of having Captain Kirk and Mr. Spock. The second thing is this whole factor of preparation and how we want to bypass that process of marination.  This takes us to the third part, which is the one word or the one term. Part 3: One Word This podcast started with the story about Dick Fosbury. You have to ask yourself, “Why did that story exist? What is the point of that story?” the story was about obstacles and overcoming those obstacles, but why did the story matter? The story mattered because of that one word or one term and in this case the one term is a different perspective. Right until that moment in Mexico when Dick Fosbury sailed over the bar like a 2-legged camel, there was only one perspective and that perspective was to jump over it, straddle over it. He went over in a completely different way. The one term is about different perspective and that’s how we look at the entire article. We didn’t go about how do we construct our article and what is the structure of the article, but we looked at things that stop us. We don’t realise that they’re stopping us and that is editing and preparation and the one word that one word or one term which is different perspective. It allows me to do both the preparation and the editing. When I’m preparing, I’m thinking of how can I have a different perspective on article writing. Then when I’m done and Mr. Editor has to show up, at point in time I’m going, “Did I do this? Did I actually adhere to the one word or one term?” In a way the one word or one term satisfies the needs of those fresh 2 guys, which is preparation and editing and he does so, so brilliantly. When you’re siting down to write something, create something ask yourself, “What is the one thing that I want to convey here? What is that endpoint?” Once you know the one word or one term you will be able to communicate in a way that you’ve never communicated before. You’d be able to edit it in a way that you’ve never done before. Can it be more than one word or one term? One term is a couple of words. Maybe you could stretch it to 3 words. The problem is that you may want to put in 3 words or 4 words or 5 words to describe your article and the further away you go from one word the more complicated it becomes. It’s very, very hard to then edit something or nail it down so find one word. Ask yourself, “What am I going to talk about today? Is it endeavour or is it scarcity or is it premium?” The point is once you get the one word and the one term that becomes a lot simpler and that’s really what we want. Summary That brings us to the end of this podcast. What did we cover today? We covered 3 things. The first thing was the factor of editing that the editor and the writer they’re 2 different people. They show up at different times of day, probably on different days as well. When you write and you edit on the same day or write and edit, write and edit, write and edit, thank you. You’re just frustrating yourself and driving yourselves completely crazy. Do not edit. Come back another day. Do not become Captain Spock. The second thing is the preparation. The professionals they don’t sit down to write. They don’t sit down to create. They sit down to plan. You need to go away somewhere. Plan, come back then you start to write. If you have to learn how to write, you can deconstruct say this piece because it’s there. It’s there in the show notes. You can deconstruct how it is created and then recreate it or you can do an article-writing course and learn how structure is built and how articles come together and how podcast come together and how … It’s all based on structure and once you understand the structure it’s just a matter of unfolding it like any language. The third thing that we covered was one word. The one word comes before you head out to the cafe, before you sit down to plan. It’s what am I going to cover today, what is that one thing that I want my audience to get. Once you know that and you should know that, then it’s very simple or rather a lot simpler to get to the end result. What’s the one thing that you can do today? The one thing that you should do today is just sit now and say, “I’m going to write an article. What is the one word that I’m going to cover?” If you’re not sure what you should do, I would suggest you go to the show notes and look at some of the links that I put there. Then deconstruct it and see how you can actually work out what one word was I trying to cover. You’ll start to see a pattern and once you get that pattern you will learn how to do it yourself.. Of course there is no substitute for being with a good teacher and I am a good teacher and you know that. I’m going to be there alive in Nashville, Tennessee and then in Amsterdam in The Netherlands and we’re going to do a storytelling workshop. I don’t know if you noticed, but I’m sure you did, this podcast and every podcast is full of stories and that’s what keeps you going. As you’re walking, as you’re driving, suddenly in the middle of all those facts and figures there’s the story unfolding how does that story unfold. When you read the book The Brain Audit or you read the book on pricing or you read the book on testimonials, when you read those books you don’t always know why you like the book so much. Sure there’s a structure. Sure there’s a system, but more critically there are case studies and examples and analogies and stories and that’s what keeps the progression going ahead. Fact and figures they are very good but they are very tiring. Storytelling becomes very critical. It’s not only critical to get the message across in a meaningful way, but it’s also very helpful to know how to construct stories so that your audience remembers them. There are lots of storytelling books and there are lots of storytelling workshops, so why is this one going to be different? This one is different because this is storytelling versus storytelling. When you open a book on storytelling, essentially they’re teaching you how to write short stories or they’re telling how to write a script or a movie. Very rarely are you going to get storytelling that helps you construct stuff from business, for writing articles, for adding to podcast or seminars or just about everything that you do in business. How do you connect it back to the business? How do you create books? How do you create reports? How do you create witch stories embedded in them so they become irresistible? That’s not what most workshops and books online are going to be able to teach you and that’s why this workshop is so critical. Come join us in Nashville on the second, third and fourth of December or if you’re in Europe it’s the fifteenth, sixteenth and seventeenth of December. You can find everything at psychotactics.com/story-telling-workshop. The prices are going up. We always raise prices and they’re going to go up every 20 days or so. By the time you get to it several months later, which is when the workshop begins, it will be at its highest price. We are still in the early bird stages so go to psychotactics.com/story-telling-workshop and we’ll see you there. If you haven’t read The Brain Audit, you should read The Brain Audit. Why? Because it’s one of the coolest business books you will ever read. It has lots of stories and it’s the barrier to the workshop. You have to rear The Brain Audit before you get there, so either the workshop and The Brain Audit or join us at 5000bc.com. That’s it for me on a Friday evening, not 4am, so that’s a little different. Bye for now. Storytelling is “persuasion with class” Does the brain actually process thoughts in a step-by-step manner? You can use all the “buy now” buttons and countdown clocks, but it just comes across as aggressive. You can use facts, figures, and yes, they all work to persuade, but storytelling does it with finesse. See how stories are used in the excerpt of The Brain Audit to get your attention with finesse.

Welcome to episode #238. On the show: Thync's digital drug; Google's Location Aware Search; Indoor Atlas partners with Aisle411; Marriott and Netflix Travel Brilliantly together; Nomadic Gifts brings back the carrier pigeon; Verve Mobile acquires Fosbury; Facebook gives away beacons for free; Le Petit Chef entertains on your dinner plate. Our resource this week is The Meaning of Local from xAd. Full show notes can be found here.

Welcome to episode #238. On the show: Thync's digital drug; Google's Location Aware Search; Indoor Atlas partners with Aisle411; Marriott and Netflix Travel Brilliantly together; Nomadic Gifts brings back the carrier pigeon; Verve Mobile acquires Fosbury; Facebook gives away beacons for free; Le Petit Chef entertains on your dinner plate. Our resource this week is The Meaning of Local from xAd. Full show notes can be found here.

Nypremiär för Bästa Minnet. I första avsnittet av 2014 års program dyker Staffan Dopping ner i - eller kanske snarare över - en känd sporthändelse från 1968. Svante Weyler springer över en nybyggd bro och Anna Charlotta Gunnarsson plockar heta poäng på linjetema. Programledare: Nina Allergren. Dagens tävlande:  Anna Charlotta Gunnarsson, journalist. Minns bäst: Marie Myriams ESC-vinst 1977. Impact! Mitt intresse för schlager totalväcktes. Jesper Olsens straffar i fotbolls-VM 1986. Hade väggen full med affischer på honom efter det. Ylvas och mina resor i På spåret. Kommer fortfarande ihåg nästan varenda följdfråga.   Svante Weyler, förläggare.  Minns bäst: Doften av min mammas parfym när hon gjorde sig fin. Staffan Dopping, kommunikatör. Minns bäst: När Kent Finell i Gomorron 1969 (eller var det -70?) avbröt musiken och lämnade över till Bo Holmström som berättade om missödet på Apollo 13. De kunde ha dött i rymden.  Telefongäst:  Carina Hilmersson  Programmet produceras av produktionsbolaget Munck. Kontakta oss på bastaminnet@sverigesradio.se  Producent: David Rune

Percorso funambolico tra invenzioni ed inventori. Dal Giappone ai buchi neri passando per le catastrofi, lo sport e la storia.

Intervista a Alessandro Mattiuzzo, voce e chitarra degli Es, nonchè fondatore di Fosbury Records. Intervista a Massimo Martulli dei Brahaman.  Il 21 settembre del 2012 esce il primo album della band: “Anche il più ottimista” (Seahorse Recordings).

Intervista a Alessandro Mattiuzzo, voce e chitarra degli Es, nonchè fondatore di Fosbury Records. Intervista a Massimo Martulli dei Brahaman.  Il 21 settembre del 2012 esce il primo album della band: “Anche il più ottimista” (Seahorse Recordings).

In the 1960s, American athlete Dick Fosbury revolutionised high-jumping by inventing the 'Fosbury flop'. Instead of diving or scissor-kicking over the high-jump bar, Fosbury floated across on his back. He went on to win a gold medal at the 1968 Olympic Games in Mexico City.In 2011, Alan Johnston spoke to Dick Fosbury for Sporting Witness.Image: Dick Fosbury's winning leap at the 1968 Mexico City Olympics (Credit: Bettmann/Getty Images)

Live aufgenommen im wunderschönen Potsdam, die Jungs und Mädels von Fosbury Flopp!klicke mal hier, bzw. recht-klicken und Speichern Unten um es runterzuladen!die sind echt gut live! und die Flöte, DIE FLÖTE!!Web: www.gepodkast.tk ::: Kontakt: gepodkast@gmail.com ::: Produziert und Präsentiert von Paul Alvarez Löblich in Würzburg, Bayern.Du kannst gerne diese Sendung kopieren und verteilen, aber bitte nicht verkaufen oder verändern!