POPULARITY
Yesterday, the self-styled San Francisco “progressive” Joan Williams was on the show arguing that Democrats need to relearn the language of the American working class. But, as some of you have noted, Williams seems oblivious to the fact that politics is about more than simply aping other people's language. What you say matters, and the language of American working class, like all industrial working classes, is rooted in a critique of capitalism. She should probably read the New Yorker staff writer John Cassidy's excellent new book, Capitalism and its Critics, which traces capitalism's evolution and criticism from the East India Company through modern times. He defines capitalism as production for profit by privately-owned companies in markets, encompassing various forms from Chinese state capitalism to hyper-globalization. The book examines capitalism's most articulate critics including the Luddites, Marx, Engels, Thomas Carlisle, Adam Smith, Rosa Luxemburg, Keynes & Hayek, and contemporary figures like Sylvia Federici and Thomas Piketty. Cassidy explores how major economists were often critics of their era's dominant capitalist model, and untangles capitalism's complicated relationship with colonialism, slavery and AI which he regards as a potentially unprecedented economic disruption. This should be essential listening for all Democrats seeking to reinvent a post Biden-Harris party and message. 5 key takeaways* Capitalism has many forms - From Chinese state capitalism to Keynesian managed capitalism to hyper-globalization, all fitting the basic definition of production for profit by privately-owned companies in markets.* Great economists are typically critics - Smith criticized mercantile capitalism, Keynes critiqued laissez-faire capitalism, and Hayek/Friedman opposed managed capitalism. Each generation's leading economists challenge their era's dominant model.* Modern corporate structure has deep roots - The East India Company was essentially a modern multinational corporation with headquarters, board of directors, stockholders, and even a private army - showing capitalism's organizational continuity across centuries.* Capitalism is intertwined with colonialism and slavery - Industrial capitalism was built on pre-existing colonial and slave systems, particularly through the cotton industry and plantation economies.* AI represents a potentially unprecedented disruption - Unlike previous technological waves, AI may substitute rather than complement human labor on a massive scale, potentially creating political backlash exceeding even the "China shock" that contributed to Trump's rise.Keen On America is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Full TranscriptAndrew Keen: Hello, everybody. A couple of days ago, we did a show with Joan Williams. She has a new book out, "Outclassed: How the Left Lost the Working Class and How to Win Them Back." A book about language, about how to talk to the American working class. She also had a piece in Jacobin Magazine, an anti-capitalist magazine, about how the left needs to speak to what she calls average American values. We talked, of course, about Bernie Sanders and AOC and their language of fighting oligarchy, and the New York Times followed that up with "The Enduring Power of Anti-Capitalism in American Politics."But of course, that brings the question: what exactly is capitalism? I did a little bit of research. We can find definitions of capitalism from AI, from Wikipedia, even from online dictionaries, but I thought we might do a little better than relying on Wikipedia and come to a man who's given capitalism and its critics a great deal of thought. John Cassidy is well known as a staff writer at The New Yorker. He's the author of a wonderful book, the best book, actually, on the dot-com insanity. And his new book, "Capitalism and its Critics," is out this week. John, congratulations on the book.So I've got to be a bit of a schoolmaster with you, John, and get some definitions first. What exactly is capitalism before we get to criticism of it?John Cassidy: Yeah, I mean, it's a very good question, Andrew. Obviously, through the decades, even the centuries, there have been many different definitions of the term capitalism and there are different types of capitalism. To not be sort of too ideological about it, the working definition I use is basically production for profit—that could be production of goods or mostly in the new and, you know, in today's economy, production of services—for profit by companies which are privately owned in markets. That's a very sort of all-encompassing definition.Within that, you can have all sorts of different types of capitalism. You can have Chinese state capitalism, you can have the old mercantilism, which industrial capitalism came after, which Trump seems to be trying to resurrect. You can have Keynesian managed capitalism that we had for 30 or 40 years after the Second World War, which I grew up in in the UK. Or you can have sort of hyper-globalization, hyper-capitalism that we've tried for the last 30 years. There are all those different varieties of capitalism consistent with a basic definition, I think.Andrew Keen: That keeps you busy, John. I know you started this project, which is a big book and it's a wonderful book. I read it. I don't always read all the books I have on the show, but I read from cover to cover full of remarkable stories of the critics of capitalism. You note in the beginning that you began this in 2016 with the beginnings of Trump. What was it about the 2016 election that triggered a book about capitalism and its critics?John Cassidy: Well, I was reporting on it at the time for The New Yorker and it struck me—I covered, I basically covered the economy in various forms for various publications since the late 80s, early 90s. In fact, one of my first big stories was the stock market crash of '87. So yes, I am that old. But it seemed to me in 2016 when you had Bernie Sanders running from the left and Trump running from the right, but both in some way offering very sort of similar critiques of capitalism. People forget that Trump in 2016 actually was running from the left of the Republican Party. He was attacking big business. He was attacking Wall Street. He doesn't do that these days very much, but at the time he was very much posing as the sort of outsider here to protect the interests of the average working man.And it seemed to me that when you had this sort of pincer movement against the then ruling model, this wasn't just a one-off. It seemed to me it was a sort of an emerging crisis of legitimacy for the system. And I thought there could be a good book written about how we got to here. And originally I thought it would be a relatively short book just based on the last sort of 20 or 30 years since the collapse of the Cold War and the sort of triumphalism of the early 90s.But as I got into it more and more, I realized that so many of the issues which had been raised, things like globalization, rising inequality, monopoly power, exploitation, even pollution and climate change, these issues go back to the very start of the capitalist system or the industrial capitalist system back in sort of late 18th century, early 19th century Britain. So I thought, in the end, I thought, you know what, let's just do the whole thing soup to nuts through the eyes of the critics.There have obviously been many, many histories of capitalism written. I thought that an original way to do it, or hopefully original, would be to do a sort of a narrative through the lives and the critiques of the critics of various stages. So that's, I hope, what sets it apart from other books on the subject, and also provides a sort of narrative frame because, you know, I am a New Yorker writer, I realize if you want people to read things, you've got to make it readable. Easiest way to make things readable is to center them around people. People love reading about other people. So that's sort of the narrative frame. I start off with a whistleblower from the East India Company back in the—Andrew Keen: Yeah, I want to come to that. But before, John, my sense is that to simplify what you're saying, this is a labor of love. You're originally from Leeds, the heart of Yorkshire, the center of the very industrial revolution, the first industrial revolution where, in your historical analysis, capitalism was born. Is it a labor of love? What's your family relationship with capitalism? How long was the family in Leeds?John Cassidy: Right, I mean that's a very good question. It is a labor of love in a way, but it's not—our family doesn't go—I'm from an Irish family, family of Irish immigrants who moved to England in the 1940s and 1950s. So my father actually did start working in a big mill, the Kirkstall Forge in Leeds, which is a big steel mill, and he left after seeing one of his co-workers have his arms chopped off in one of the machinery, so he decided it wasn't for him and he spent his life working in the construction industry, which was dominated by immigrants as it is here now.So I don't have a—it's not like I go back to sort of the start of the industrial revolution, but I did grow up in the middle of Leeds, very working class, very industrial neighborhood. And what a sort of irony is, I'll point out, I used to, when I was a kid, I used to play golf on a municipal golf course called Gotts Park in Leeds, which—you know, most golf courses in America are sort of in the affluent suburbs, country clubs. This was right in the middle of Armley in Leeds, which is where the Victorian jail is and a very rough neighborhood. There's a small bit of land which they built a golf course on. It turns out it was named after one of the very first industrialists, Benjamin Gott, who was a wool and textile industrialist, and who played a part in the Luddite movement, which I mention.So it turns out, I was there when I was 11 or 12, just learning how to play golf on this scrappy golf course. And here I am, 50 years later, writing about Benjamin Gott at the start of the Industrial Revolution. So yeah, no, sure. I think it speaks to me in a way that perhaps it wouldn't to somebody else from a different background.Andrew Keen: We did a show with William Dalrymple, actually, a couple of years ago. He's been on actually since, the Anglo or Scottish Indian historian. His book on the East India Company, "The Anarchy," is a classic. You begin in some ways your history of capitalism with the East India Company. What was it about the East India Company, John, that makes it different from other for-profit organizations in economic, Western economic history?John Cassidy: I mean, I read that. It's a great book, by the way. That was actually quoted in my chapter on these. Yeah, I remember. I mean, the reason I focused on it was for two reasons. Number one, I was looking for a start, a narrative start to the book. And it seemed to me, you know, the obvious place to start is with the start of the industrial revolution. If you look at economics history textbooks, that's where they always start with Arkwright and all the inventors, you know, who were the sort of techno-entrepreneurs of their time, the sort of British Silicon Valley, if you could think of it as, in Lancashire and Derbyshire in the late 18th century.So I knew I had to sort of start there in some way, but I thought that's a bit pat. Is there another way into it? And it turns out that in 1772 in England, there was a huge bailout of the East India Company, very much like the sort of 2008, 2009 bailout of Wall Street. The company got into trouble. So I thought, you know, maybe there's something there. And I eventually found this guy, William Bolts, who worked for the East India Company, turned into a whistleblower after he was fired for finagling in India like lots of the people who worked for the company did.So that gave me two things. Number one, it gave me—you know, I'm a writer, so it gave me something to focus on a narrative. His personal history is very interesting. But number two, it gave me a sort of foundation because industrial capitalism didn't come from nowhere. You know, it was built on top of a pre-existing form of capitalism, which we now call mercantile capitalism, which was very protectionist, which speaks to us now. But also it had these big monopolistic multinational companies.The East India Company, in some ways, was a very modern corporation. It had a headquarters in Leadenhall Street in the city of London. It had a board of directors, it had stockholders, the company sent out very detailed instructions to the people in the field in India and Indonesia and Malaysia who were traders who bought things from the locals there, brought them back to England on their company ships. They had a company army even to enforce—to protect their operations there. It was an incredible multinational corporation.So that was also, I think, fascinating because it showed that even in the pre-existing system, you know, big corporations existed, there were monopolies, they had royal monopolies given—first the East India Company got one from Queen Elizabeth. But in some ways, they were very similar to modern monopolistic corporations. And they had some of the problems we've seen with modern monopolistic corporations, the way they acted. And Bolts was the sort of first corporate whistleblower, I thought. Yeah, that was a way of sort of getting into the story, I think. Hopefully, you know, it's just a good read, I think.William Bolts's story because he was—he came from nowhere, he was Dutch, he wasn't even English and he joined the company as a sort of impoverished young man, went to India like a lot of English minor aristocrats did to sort of make your fortune. The way the company worked, you had to sort of work on company time and make as much money as you could for the company, but then in your spare time you're allowed to trade for yourself. So a lot of the—without getting into too much detail, but you know, English aristocracy was based on—you know, the eldest child inherits everything, so if you were the younger brother of the Duke of Norfolk, you actually didn't inherit anything. So all of these minor aristocrats, so major aristocrats, but who weren't first born, joined the East India Company, went out to India and made a fortune, and then came back and built huge houses. Lots of the great manor houses in southern England were built by people from the East India Company and they were known as Nabobs, which is an Indian term. So they were the sort of, you know, billionaires of their time, and it was based on—as I say, it wasn't based on industrial capitalism, it was based on mercantile capitalism.Andrew Keen: Yeah, the beginning of the book, which focuses on Bolts and the East India Company, brings to mind for me two things. Firstly, the intimacy of modern capitalism, modern industrial capitalism with colonialism and of course slavery—lots of books have been written on that. Touch on this and also the relationship between the birth of capitalism and the birth of liberalism or democracy. John Stuart Mill, of course, the father in many ways of Western democracy. His day job, ironically enough, or perhaps not ironically, was at the East India Company. So how do those two things connect, or is it just coincidental?John Cassidy: Well, I don't think it is entirely coincidental, I mean, J.S. Mill—his father, James Mill, was also a well-known philosopher in the sort of, obviously, in the earlier generation, earlier than him. And he actually wrote the official history of the East India Company. And I think they gave his son, the sort of brilliant protégé, J.S. Mill, a job as largely as a sort of sinecure, I think. But he did go in and work there in the offices three or four days a week.But I think it does show how sort of integral—the sort of—as you say, the inheritor and the servant in Britain, particularly, of colonial capitalism was. So the East India Company was, you know, it was in decline by that stage in the middle of the 19th century, but it didn't actually give up its monopoly. It wasn't forced to give up its monopoly on the Indian trade until 1857, after, you know, some notorious massacres and there was a sort of public outcry.So yeah, no, that's—it's very interesting that the British—it's sort of unique to Britain in a way, but it's interesting that industrial capitalism arose alongside this pre-existing capitalist structure and somebody like Mill is a sort of paradoxical figure because actually he was quite critical of aspects of industrial capitalism and supported sort of taxes on the rich, even though he's known as the great, you know, one of the great apostles of the free market and free market liberalism. And his day job, as you say, he was working for the East India Company.Andrew Keen: What about the relationship between the birth of industrial capitalism, colonialism and slavery? Those are big questions and I know you deal with them in some—John Cassidy: I think you can't just write an economic history of capitalism now just starting with the cotton industry and say, you know, it was all about—it was all about just technical progress and gadgets, etc. It was built on a sort of pre-existing system which was colonial and, you know, the slave trade was a central element of that. Now, as you say, there have been lots and lots of books written about it, the whole 1619 project got an incredible amount of attention a few years ago. So I didn't really want to rehash all that, but I did want to acknowledge the sort of role of slavery, especially in the rise of the cotton industry because of course, a lot of the raw cotton was grown in the plantations in the American South.So the way I actually ended up doing that was by writing a chapter about Eric Williams, a Trinidadian writer who ended up as the Prime Minister of Trinidad when it became independent in the 1960s. But when he was younger, he wrote a book which is now regarded as a classic. He went to Oxford to do a PhD, won a scholarship. He was very smart. I won a sort of Oxford scholarship myself but 50 years before that, he came across the Atlantic and did an undergraduate degree in history and then did a PhD there and his PhD thesis was on slavery and capitalism.And at the time, in the 1930s, the link really wasn't acknowledged. You could read any sort of standard economic history written by British historians, and they completely ignored that. He made the argument that, you know, slavery was integral to the rise of capitalism and he basically started an argument which has been raging ever since the 1930s and, you know, if you want to study economic history now you have to sort of—you know, have to have to address that. And the way I thought, even though the—it's called the Williams thesis is very famous. I don't think many people knew much about where it came from. So I thought I'd do a chapter on—Andrew Keen: Yeah, that chapter is excellent. You mentioned earlier the Luddites, you're from Yorkshire where Luddism in some ways was born. One of the early chapters is on the Luddites. We did a show with Brian Merchant, his book, "Blood in the Machine," has done very well, I'm sure you're familiar with it. I always understood the Luddites as being against industrialization, against the machine, as opposed to being against capitalism. But did those two things get muddled together in the history of the Luddites?John Cassidy: I think they did. I mean, you know, Luddites, when we grew up, I mean you're English too, you know to be called a Luddite was a term of abuse, right? You know, you were sort of antediluvian, anti-technology, you're stupid. It was only, I think, with the sort of computer revolution, the tech revolution of the last 30, 40 years and the sort of disruptions it's caused, that people have started to look back at the Luddites and say, perhaps they had a point.For them, they were basically pre-industrial capitalism artisans. They worked for profit-making concerns, small workshops. Some of them worked for themselves, so they were sort of sole proprietor capitalists. Or they worked in small venues, but the rise of industrial capitalism, factory capitalism or whatever, basically took away their livelihoods progressively. So they associated capitalism with new technology. In their minds it was the same. But their argument wasn't really a technological one or even an economic one, it was more a moral one. They basically made the moral argument that capitalists shouldn't have the right to just take away their livelihoods with no sort of recompense for them.At the time they didn't have any parliamentary representation. You know, they weren't revolutionaries. The first thing they did was create petitions to try and get parliament to step in, sort of introduce some regulation here. They got turned down repeatedly by the sort of—even though it was a very aristocratic parliament, places like Manchester and Leeds didn't have any representation at all. So it was only after that that they sort of turned violent and started, you know, smashing machines and machines, I think, were sort of symbols of the system, which they saw as morally unjust.And I think that's sort of what—obviously, there's, you know, a lot of technological disruption now, so we can, especially as it starts to come for the educated cognitive class, we can sort of sympathize with them more. But I think the sort of moral critique that there's this, you know, underneath the sort of great creativity and economic growth that capitalism produces, there is also a lot of destruction and a lot of victims. And I think that message, you know, is becoming a lot more—that's why I think why they've been rediscovered in the last five or ten years and I'm one of the people I guess contributing to that rediscovery.Andrew Keen: There's obviously many critiques of capitalism politically. I want to come to Marx in a second, but your chapter, I thought, on Thomas Carlyle and this nostalgic conservatism was very important and there are other conservatives as well. John, do you think that—and you mentioned Trump earlier, who is essentially a nostalgist for a—I don't know, some sort of bizarre pre-capitalist age in America. Is there something particularly powerful about the anti-capitalism of romantics like Carlyle, 19th century Englishman, there were many others of course.John Cassidy: Well, I think so. I mean, I think what is—conservatism, when we were young anyway, was associated with Thatcherism and Reaganism, which, you know, lionized the free market and free market capitalism and was a reaction against the pre-existing form of capitalism, Keynesian capitalism of the sort of 40s to the 80s. But I think what got lost in that era was the fact that there have always been—you've got Hayek up there, obviously—Andrew Keen: And then Keynes and Hayek, the two—John Cassidy: Right, it goes to the end of that. They had a great debate in the 1930s about these issues. But Hayek really wasn't a conservative person, and neither was Milton Friedman. They were sort of free market revolutionaries, really, that you'd let the market rip and it does good things. And I think that that sort of a view, you know, it just became very powerful. But we sort of lost sight of the fact that there was also a much older tradition of sort of suspicion of radical changes of any type. And that was what conservatism was about to some extent. If you think about Baldwin in Britain, for example.And there was a sort of—during the Industrial Revolution, some of the strongest supporters of factory acts to reduce hours and hourly wages for women and kids were actually conservatives, Tories, as they were called at the time, like Ashley. That tradition, Carlyle was a sort of extreme representative of that. I mean, Carlyle was a sort of proto-fascist, let's not romanticize him, he lionized strongmen, Frederick the Great, and he didn't really believe in democracy. But he also had—he was appalled by the sort of, you know, the—like, what's the phrase I'm looking for? The sort of destructive aspects of industrial capitalism, both on the workers, you know, he said it was a dehumanizing system, sounded like Marx in some ways. That it dehumanized the workers, but also it destroyed the environment.He was an early environmentalist. He venerated the environment, was actually very strongly linked to the transcendentalists in America, people like Thoreau, who went to visit him when he visited Britain and he saw the sort of destructive impact that capitalism was having locally in places like Manchester, which were filthy with filthy rivers, etc. So he just saw the whole system as sort of morally bankrupt and he was a great writer, Carlyle, whatever you think of him. Great user of language, so he has these great ringing phrases like, you know, the cash nexus or calling it the Gospel of Mammonism, the shabbiest gospel ever preached under the sun was industrial capitalism.So, again, you know, that's a sort of paradoxical thing, because I think for so long conservatism was associated with, you know, with support for the free market and still is in most of the Republican Party, but then along comes Trump and sort of conquers the party with a, you know, more skeptical, as you say, romantic, not really based on any reality, but a sort of romantic view that America can stand by itself in the world. I mean, I see Trump actually as a sort of an effort to sort of throw back to mercantile capitalism in a way. You know, which was not just pre-industrial, but was also pre-democracy, run by monarchs, which I'm sure appeals to him, and it was based on, you know, large—there were large tariffs. You couldn't import things in the UK. If you want to import anything to the UK, you have to send it on a British ship because of the navigation laws. It was a very protectionist system and it's actually, you know, as I said, had a lot of parallels with what Trump's trying to do or tries to do until he backs off.Andrew Keen: You cheat a little bit in the book in the sense that you—everyone has their own chapter. We'll talk a little bit about Hayek and Smith and Lenin and Friedman. You do have one chapter on Marx, but you also have a chapter on Engels. So you kind of cheat. You combine the two. Is it possible, though, to do—and you've just written this book, so you know this as well as anyone. How do you write a book about capitalism and its critics and only really give one chapter to Marx, who is so dominant? I mean, you've got lots of Marxists in the book, including Lenin and Luxemburg. How fundamental is Marx to a criticism of capitalism? Is most criticism, especially from the left, from progressives, is it really just all a footnote to Marx?John Cassidy: I wouldn't go that far, but I think obviously on the left he is the central figure. But there's an element of sort of trying to rebuild Engels a bit in this. I mean, I think of Engels and Marx—I mean obviously Marx wrote the great classic "Capital," etc. But in the 1840s, when they both started writing about capitalism, Engels was sort of ahead of Marx in some ways. I mean, the sort of materialist concept, the idea that economics rules everything, Engels actually was the first one to come up with that in an essay in the 1840s which Marx then published in one of his—in the German newspaper he worked for at the time, radical newspaper, and he acknowledged openly that that was really what got him thinking seriously about economics, and even in the late—in 20, 25 years later when he wrote "Capital," all three volumes of it and the Grundrisse, just these enormous outpourings of analysis on capitalism.He acknowledged Engels's role in that and obviously Engels wrote the first draft of the Communist Manifesto in 1848 too, which Marx then topped and tailed and—he was a better writer obviously, Marx, and he gave it the dramatic language that we all know it for. So I think Engels and Marx together obviously are the central sort of figures in the sort of left-wing critique. But they didn't start out like that. I mean, they were very obscure, you've got to remember.You know, they were—when they were writing, Marx was writing "Capital" in London, it never even got published in English for another 20 years. It was just published in German. He was basically an expat. He had been thrown out of Germany, he had been thrown out of France, so England was last resort and the British didn't consider him a threat so they were happy to let him and the rest of the German sort of left in there. I think it became—it became the sort of epochal figure after his death really, I think, when he was picked up by the left-wing parties, which are especially the SPD in Germany, which was the first sort of socialist mass party and was officially Marxist until the First World War and there were great internal debates.And then of course, because Lenin and the Russians came out of that tradition too, Marxism then became the official doctrine of the Soviet Union when they adopted a version of it. And again there were massive internal arguments about what Marx really meant, and in fact, you know, one interpretation of the last 150 years of left-wing sort of intellectual development is as a sort of argument about what did Marx really mean and what are the important bits of it, what are the less essential bits of it. It's a bit like the "what did Keynes really mean" that you get in liberal circles.So yeah, Marx, obviously, this is basically an intellectual history of critiques of capitalism. In that frame, he is absolutely a central figure. Why didn't I give him more space than a chapter and a chapter and a half with Engels? There have been a million books written about Marx. I mean, it's not that—it's not that he's an unknown figure. You know, there's a best-selling book written in Britain about 20 years ago about him and then I was quoting, in my biographical research, I relied on some more recent, more scholarly biographies. So he's an endlessly fascinating figure but I didn't want him to dominate the book so I gave him basically the same space as everybody else.Andrew Keen: You've got, as I said, you've got a chapter on Adam Smith who's often considered the father of economics. You've got a chapter on Keynes. You've got a chapter on Friedman. And you've got a chapter on Hayek, all the great modern economists. Is it possible, John, to be a distinguished economist one way or the other and not be a critic of capitalism?John Cassidy: Well, I don't—I mean, I think history would suggest that the greatest economists have been critics of capitalism in their own time. People would say to me, what the hell have you got Milton Friedman and Friedrich Hayek in a book about critics of capitalism? They were great exponents, defenders of capitalism. They loved the system. That is perfectly true. But in the 1930s, 40s, 50s, 60s, and 70s, middle of the 20th century, they were actually arch-critics of the ruling form of capitalism at the time, which was what I call managed capitalism. What some people call Keynesianism, what other people call European social democracy, whatever you call it, it was a model of a mixed economy in which the government played a large role both in propping up demand and in providing an extensive social safety net in the UK and providing public healthcare and public education. It was a sort of hybrid model.Most of the economy in terms of the businesses remained in private hands. So most production was capitalistic. It was a capitalist system. They didn't go to the Soviet model of nationalizing everything and Britain did nationalize some businesses, but most places didn't. The US of course didn't but it was a form of managed capitalism. And Hayek and Friedman were both great critics of that and wanted to sort of move back to 19th century laissez-faire model.Keynes was a—was actually a great, I view him anyway, as really a sort of late Victorian liberal and was trying to protect as much of the sort of J.S. Mill view of the world as he could, but he thought capitalism had one fatal flaw: that it tended to fall into recessions and then they can snowball and the whole system can collapse which is what had basically happened in the early 1930s until Keynesian policies were adopted. Keynes sort of differed from a lot of his followers—I have a chapter on Joan Robinson in there, who were pretty left-wing and wanted to sort of use Keynesianism as a way to shift the economy quite far to the left. Keynes didn't really believe in that. He has a famous quote that, you know, once you get to full employment, you can then rely on the free market to sort of take care of things. He was still a liberal at heart.Going back to Adam Smith, why is he in a book on criticism of capitalism? And again, it goes back to what I said at the beginning. He actually wrote "The Wealth of Nations"—he explains in the introduction—as a critique of mercantile capitalism. His argument was that he was a pro-free trader, pro-small business, free enterprise. His argument was if you get the government out of the way, we don't need these government-sponsored monopolies like the East India Company. If you just rely on the market, the sort of market forces and competition will produce a good outcome. So then he was seen as a great—you know, he is then seen as the apostle of free market capitalism. I mean when I started as a young reporter, when I used to report in Washington, all the conservatives used to wear Adam Smith badges. You don't see Donald Trump wearing an Adam Smith badge, but that was the case.He was also—the other aspect of Smith, which I highlight, which is not often remarked on—he's also a critic of big business. He has a famous section where he discusses the sort of tendency of any group of more than three businessmen when they get together to try and raise prices and conspire against consumers. And he was very suspicious of, as I say, large companies, monopolies. I think if Adam Smith existed today, I mean, I think he would be a big supporter of Lina Khan and the sort of antitrust movement, he would say capitalism is great as long as you have competition, but if you don't have competition it becomes, you know, exploitative.Andrew Keen: Yeah, if Smith came back to live today, you have a chapter on Thomas Piketty, maybe he may not be French, but he may be taking that position about how the rich benefit from the structure of investment. Piketty's core—I've never had Piketty on the show, but I've had some of his followers like Emmanuel Saez from Berkeley. Yeah. How powerful is Piketty's critique of capitalism within the context of the classical economic analysis from Hayek and Friedman? Yeah, it's a very good question.John Cassidy: It's a very good question. I mean, he's a very paradoxical figure, Piketty, in that he obviously shot to world fame and stardom with his book on capital in the 21st century, which in some ways he obviously used the capital as a way of linking himself to Marx, even though he said he never read Marx. But he was basically making the same argument that if you leave capitalism unrestrained and don't do anything about monopolies etc. or wealth, you're going to get massive inequality and he—I think his great contribution, Piketty and the school of people, one of them you mentioned, around him was we sort of had a vague idea that inequality was going up and that, you know, wages were stagnating, etc.What he and his colleagues did is they produced these sort of scientific empirical studies showing in very simple to understand terms how the sort of share of income and wealth of the top 10 percent, the top 5 percent, the top 1 percent and the top 0.1 percent basically skyrocketed from the 1970s to about 2010. And it was, you know, he was an MIT PhD. Saez, who you mentioned, is a Berkeley professor. They were schooled in neoclassical economics at Harvard and MIT and places like that. So the right couldn't dismiss them as sort of, you know, lefties or Trots or whatever who're just sort of making this stuff up. They had to acknowledge that this was actually an empirical reality.I think it did change the whole basis of the debate and it was sort of part of this reaction against capitalism in the 2010s. You know it was obviously linked to the sort of Sanders and the Occupy Wall Street movement at the time. It came out of the—you know, the financial crisis as well when Wall Street disgraced itself. I mean, I wrote a previous book on all that, but people have sort of, I think, forgotten the great reaction against that a decade ago, which I think even Trump sort of exploited, as I say, by using anti-banker rhetoric at the time.So, Piketty was a great figure, I think, from, you know, I was thinking, who are the most influential critics of capitalism in the 21st century? And I think you'd have to put him up there on the list. I'm not saying he's the only one or the most eminent one. But I think he is a central figure. Now, of course, you'd think, well, this is a really powerful critic of capitalism, and nobody's going to pick up, and Bernie's going to take off and everything. But here we are a decade later now. It seems to be what the backlash has produced is a swing to the right, not a swing to the left. So that's, again, a sort of paradox.Andrew Keen: One person I didn't expect to come up in the book, John, and I was fascinated with this chapter, is Silvia Federici. I've tried to get her on the show. We've had some books about her writing and her kind of—I don't know, you treat her critique as a feminist one. The role of women. Why did you choose to write a chapter about Federici and that feminist critique of capitalism?John Cassidy: Right, right. Well, I don't think it was just feminist. I'll explain what I think it was. Two reasons. Number one, I wanted to get more women into the book. I mean, it's in some sense, it is a history of economics and economic critiques. And they are overwhelmingly written by men and women were sort of written out of the narrative of capitalism for a very long time. So I tried to include as many sort of women as actual thinkers as I could and I have a couple of early socialist feminist thinkers, Anna Wheeler and Flora Tristan and then I cover some of the—I cover Rosa Luxemburg as the great sort of tribune of the left revolutionary socialist, communist whatever you want to call it. Anti-capitalist I think is probably also important to note about. Yeah, and then I also have Joan Robinson, but I wanted somebody to do something in the modern era, and I thought Federici, in the world of the Wages for Housework movement, is very interesting from two perspectives.Number one, Federici herself is a Marxist, and I think she probably would still consider herself a revolutionary. She's based in New York, as you know now. She lived in New York for 50 years, but she came from—she's originally Italian and came out of the Italian left in the 1960s, which was very radical. Do you know her? Did you talk to her? I didn't talk to her on this. No, she—I basically relied on, there has been a lot of, as you say, there's been a lot of stuff written about her over the years. She's written, you know, she's given various long interviews and she's written a book herself, a version, a history of housework, so I figured it was all there and it was just a matter of pulling it together.But I think the critique, why the critique is interesting, most of the book is a sort of critique of how capitalism works, you know, in the production or you know, in factories or in offices or you know, wherever capitalist operations are working, but her critique is sort of domestic reproduction, as she calls it, the role of unpaid labor in supporting capitalism. I mean it goes back a long way actually. There was this moment, I sort of trace it back to the 1940s and 1950s when there were feminists in America who were demonstrating outside factories and making the point that you know, the factory workers and the operations of the factory, it couldn't—there's one of the famous sort of tire factory in California demonstrations where the women made the argument, look this factory can't continue to operate unless we feed and clothe the workers and provide the next generation of workers. You know, that's domestic reproduction. So their argument was that housework should be paid and Federici took that idea and a couple of her colleagues, she founded the—it's a global movement, but she founded the most famous branch in New York City in the 1970s. In Park Slope near where I live actually.And they were—you call it feminists, they were feminists in a way, but they were rejected by the sort of mainstream feminist movement, the sort of Gloria Steinems of the world, who Federici was very critical of because she said they ignored, they really just wanted to get women ahead in the sort of capitalist economy and they ignored the sort of underlying from her perspective, the underlying sort of illegitimacy and exploitation of that system. So they were never accepted as part of the feminist movement. They're to the left of the Feminist Movement.Andrew Keen: You mentioned Keynes, of course, so central in all this, particularly his analysis of the role of automation in capitalism. We did a show recently with Robert Skidelsky and I'm sure you're familiar—John Cassidy: Yeah, yeah, great, great biography of Keynes.Andrew Keen: Yeah, the great biographer of Keynes, whose latest book is "Mindless: The Human Condition in the Age of AI." You yourself wrote a brilliant book on the last tech mania and dot-com capitalism. I used it in a lot of my writing and books. What's your analysis of AI in this latest mania and the role generally of manias in the history of capitalism and indeed in critiquing capitalism? Is AI just the next chapter of the dot-com boom?John Cassidy: I think it's a very deep question. I think I'd give two answers to it. In one sense it is just the latest mania the way—I mean, the way capitalism works is we have these, I go back to Kondratiev, one of my Russian economists who ended up being killed by Stalin. He was the sort of inventor of the long wave theory of capitalism. We have these short waves where you have sort of booms and busts driven by finance and debt etc. But we also have long waves driven by technology.And obviously, in the last 40, 50 years, the two big ones are the original deployment of the internet and microchip technology in the sort of 80s and 90s culminating in the dot-com boom of the late 90s, which as you say, I wrote about. Thanks very much for your kind comments on the book. If you just sort of compare it from a financial basis I think they are very similar just in terms of the sort of role of hype from Wall Street in hyping up these companies. The sort of FOMO aspect of it among investors that they you know, you can't miss out. So just buy the companies blindly. And the sort of lionization in the press and the media of, you know, of AI as the sort of great wave of the future.So if you take a sort of skeptical market based approach, I would say, yeah, this is just another sort of another mania which will eventually burst and it looked like it had burst for a few weeks when Trump put the tariffs up, now the market seemed to be recovering. But I think there is, there may be something new about it. I am not, I don't pretend to be a technical expert. I try to rely on the evidence of or the testimony of people who know the systems well and also economists who have studied it. It seems to me the closer you get to it the more alarming it is in terms of the potential shock value that there is there.I mean Trump and the sort of reaction to a larger extent can be traced back to the China shock where we had this global shock to American manufacturing and sort of hollowed out a lot of the industrial areas much of it, like industrial Britain was hollowed out in the 80s. If you, you know, even people like Altman and Elon Musk, they seem to think that this is going to be on a much larger scale than that and will basically, you know, get rid of the professions as they exist. Which would be a huge, huge shock. And I think a lot of the economists who studied this, who four or five years ago were relatively optimistic, people like Daron Acemoglu, David Autor—Andrew Keen: Simon Johnson, of course, who just won the Nobel Prize, and he's from England.John Cassidy: Simon, I did an event with Simon earlier this week. You know they've studied this a lot more closely than I have but I do interview them and I think five, six years ago they were sort of optimistic that you know this could just be a new steam engine or could be a microchip which would lead to sort of a lot more growth, rising productivity, rising productivity is usually associated with rising wages so sure there'd be short-term costs but ultimately it would be a good thing. Now, I think if you speak to them, they see since the, you know, obviously, the OpenAI—the original launch and now there's just this huge arms race with no government involvement at all I think they're coming to the conclusion that rather than being developed to sort of complement human labor, all these systems are just being rushed out to substitute for human labor. And it's just going, if current trends persist, it's going to be a China shock on an even bigger scale.You know what is going to, if that, if they're right, that is going to produce some huge political backlash at some point, that's inevitable. So I know—the thing when the dot-com bubble burst, it didn't really have that much long-term impact on the economy. People lost the sort of fake money they thought they'd made. And then the companies, obviously some of the companies like Amazon and you know Google were real genuine profit-making companies and if you bought them early you made a fortune. But AI does seem a sort of bigger, scarier phenomenon to me. I don't know. I mean, you're close to it. What do you think?Andrew Keen: Well, I'm waiting for a book, John, from you. I think you can combine dot-com and capitalism and its critics. We need you probably to cover it—you know more about it than me. Final question, I mean, it's a wonderful book and we haven't even scratched the surface everyone needs to get it. I enjoyed the chapter, for example, on Karl Polanyi and so much more. I mean, it's a big book. But my final question, John, is do you have any regrets about anyone you left out? The one person I would have liked to have been included was Rawls because of his sort of treatment of capitalism and luck as a kind of casino. I'm not sure whether you gave any thought to Rawls, but is there someone in retrospect you should have had a chapter on that you left out?John Cassidy: There are lots of people I left out. I mean, that's the problem. I mean there have been hundreds and hundreds of critics of capitalism. Rawls, of course, incredibly influential and his idea of the sort of, you know, the veil of ignorance that you should judge things not knowing where you are in the income distribution and then—Andrew Keen: And it's luck. I mean the idea of some people get lucky and some people don't.John Cassidy: It is the luck of the draw, obviously, what card you pull. I think that is a very powerful critique, but I just—because I am more of an expert on economics, I tended to leave out philosophers and sociologists. I mean, you know, you could say, where's Max Weber? Where are the anarchists? You know, where's Emma Goldman? Where's John Kenneth Galbraith, the sort of great mid-century critic of American industrial capitalism? There's so many people that you could include. I mean, I could have written 10 volumes. In fact, I refer in the book to, you know, there's always been a problem. G.D.H. Cole, a famous English historian, wrote a history of socialism back in the 1960s and 70s. You know, just getting to 1850 took him six volumes. So, you've got to pick and choose, and I don't claim this is the history of capitalism and its critics. That would be a ridiculous claim to make. I just claim it's a history written by me, and hopefully the people are interested in it, and they're sufficiently diverse that you can address all the big questions.Andrew Keen: Well it's certainly incredibly timely. Capitalism and its critics—more and more of them. Sometimes they don't even describe themselves as critics of capitalism when they're talking about oligarchs or billionaires, they're really criticizing capitalism. A must read from one of America's leading journalists. And would you call yourself a critic of capitalism, John?John Cassidy: Yeah, I guess I am, to some extent, sure. I mean, I'm not a—you know, I'm not on the far left, but I'd say I'm a center-left critic of capitalism. Yes, definitely, that would be fair.Andrew Keen: And does the left need to learn? Does everyone on the left need to read the book and learn the language of anti-capitalism in a more coherent and honest way?John Cassidy: I hope so. I mean, obviously, I'd be talking my own book there, as they say, but I hope that people on the left, but not just people on the left. I really did try to sort of be fair to the sort of right-wing critiques as well. I included the Carlyle chapter particularly, obviously, but in the later chapters, I also sort of refer to this emerging critique on the right, the sort of economic nationalist critique. So hopefully, I think people on the right could read it to understand the critiques from the left, and people on the left could read it to understand some of the critiques on the right as well.Andrew Keen: Well, it's a lovely book. It's enormously erudite and simultaneously readable. Anyone who likes John Cassidy's work from The New Yorker will love it. Congratulations, John, on the new book, and I'd love to get you back on the show as anti-capitalism in America picks up steam and perhaps manifests itself in the 2028 election. Thank you so much.John Cassidy: Thanks very much for inviting me on, it was fun.Keen On America is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit keenon.substack.com/subscribe
Con Herrera en Cope, la última hora en la mañana. Estar informado. Más de 128,000 personas han pasado ya por la capilla ardiente del Papa Francisco que por tercer y último día está instalada en el interior de la Basílica de San Pedro en el Vaticano. Esta noche ha cerrado durante solo tres horas ante la masiva afluencia de fieles que siguen llenando en estos momentos la explanada de la plaza. Y ahí, en esa explanada, se encuentra también Álvaro Saez. ¿Qué tal, Pilar? Sí, una plaza de San Pedro que en estos tres días de velatorio público nunca se ha visto tan llena como ahora y con un discurrir ...
Le Super Daily reçoit Guillaume Saez de KFC France ! Plongez au cœur de la stratégie de KFC France avec Guillaume Saez, leur passionnant brand director ! Dans cet épisode exceptionnel du Super Daily découvrez les coulisses de l'une des marques de restauration rapide les plus iconiques et les plus audacieuses de France.Explorez avec nous :Le portrait actuel de KFC France : De son implantation avec près de 400 restaurants à son modèle 100% en franchise et son leadership sur le secteur du poulet frites L'adaptation de l'héritage américain : Comment KFC concilie son ADN US avec les spécificités du marché français et la culture food localeLa construction d'une tonalité de marque unique : Plongez dans l'univers fun, irrévérencieux et communautaire qui a fait le succès des campagnes marketing de KFC FranceLes secrets des campagnes virales : De la collaboration inattendue avec Burger King à celle avec Mister V, découvrez la genèse des opérations marketing qui font le buzzLe rôle crucial des réseaux sociaux : Stratégie TikTok (avec ses millions de vues), approche Instagram et utilisation de X (Twitter) pour le partenariat avec la Fédération Française de FootballL'incursion dans le streaming sur Twitch : Le partenariat innovant avec l'émission "Hors Jeu" et la volonté d'investir le terrain du divertissementL'influence marketing : Comment KFC France aborde les collaborations avec les créateurs de contenu et l'UGC (user-generated content)Les enjeux de la livraison : Maintenir l'expérience client au-delà du restaurant grâce aux agrégateursLa stratégie de marque employeur sur LinkedIn : Le recrutement pour les franchisés et la valorisation des carrières chez KFCQue vous soyez passionné par le marketing, les stratégies de communication digitale, la pop culture, le secteur de la restauration rapide ou simplement curieux de comprendre le succès de KFC en France, cet épisode riche en insights est fait pour vous ! Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.
Recordad que podéis encontrar el episodio completo aquí: https://www.ivoox.com/extra-79-con-santi-audios-mp3_rf_139918381_1.html Si quieres escuchar todo y apoyar a Alfonso M. González en este pódcast de Japón puedes hacerlo en este enlace: https://www.ivoox.com/support/651913 Espero que os guste. ¡Un abrazo!
Con Herrera en Cope, la última hora en la mañana. Estar informado. La Iglesia reclama a los grandes partidos que aprueben la regularización extraordinaria de migrantes. Tras la Asamblea Plenaria de los Obispos españoles, el secretario general de la Conferencia Episcopal, Francisco César García Magán, ha asegurado que las demandas sociales deben ser escuchadas máxime cuando son justas. Álvaro Saez. Sí, un proceso en el que la Iglesia está dispuesta a colaborar porque, como ha dicho el secretario general, son personas que contribuyen al bien común y ahora mismo están en una situación de ...
Diego Saez Gil, the Founder and CEO of Pachama, joins us to explore how AI and satellite technology are revolutionizing forest conservation and carbon credit verification. Diego shares insights on partnering with tech giants, working with indigenous communities, and leveraging AI to protect nature.
Linkin Park, Evanescence, The Darkness, The Rasmus, Pogo Car Crash Control, Saez, Lucy Dacusz, Beach Weather en singles…
0:00 - The Sweet 16 kicked off last night! Our main takeaway: Cooper Flagg is a baaaaaad baaaaaad man. Which NBA teams are in the Flagg sweepstakes right now? How do the Draft Lottery odds work?14:10 - Christian Saez of DNVR Rockies joins the program to join Brett as the 2nd person in Denver media who maybe, kinda, sorta, possibly, potentially might have a shred of Rockies positivity left.31:56 - The lowly Utah Jazz are in Denver tonight on the 2nd night of a back-to-back. Can the Nuggets please beat up on them for 3 quarters then rest their starters in the 4th? Can we get Spencer Jones minutes tonight? PLEASE? Is that too much to ask for?
In this episode, Johan is joined by Allie Saez to dive into gut health. You'll learn how stress impacts digestion, about common symptoms to look out for, how nutrition and lifestyle change can help improve digestion and heal your gut, the 5R gut protocol, food sensitivities, why it's always better to reach out to an expert for help, rather than following random advice on social media - and more. Johan and Allie discuss practical tips for maintaining a healthy gut, and discuss why individualization is so important when it comes to digestive issues like IBS, SIBO, and intestinal permeability.Follow Allie at:https://www.instagram.com/allie_saez/ More from Johan and Odyssey Coaching Systems:- Instagram: @johanvesters_ocs- Website: www.odysseycoachingsystems.co- E-book (FREE download): www.odysseycoachingsystems.co/e-book
Ramón Saez, vicepresidente del Colegio de Farmacéuticos de la Provincia de A Coruña
En av Sveriges mest inflytelserika hiphopproducenter! Möt Mack Beats, som varit med och format den svenska hiphopscenen i över 20 år! Hans resa har präglats av nyfikenhet och ständig utveckling, från att lära sig musikproduktion på fritidsgården utan YouTube-tutorials till att producera för några av landets största artister. Vi pratar om hans kreativa process, varför han aldrig blickar bakåt, och hur han håller sig produktiv utan press genom tydliga rutiner. Hör även om skillnaderna mellan indie och majorbolag, vad som går att förhandla i skivkontrakt och varför han jämför det med en McDonald's-meny. Dessutom delar han insikter om vad som kännetecknar bra samarbeten, hur han väljer sina projekt, vad som styr hans ersättning och varför han önskar att han tagit pianolektioner som ung. Lyssna nu! Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Agradece a este podcast tantas horas de entretenimiento y disfruta de episodios exclusivos como éste. ¡Apóyale en iVoox! Lo cierto es que conozco a muchos amigos de mi aventura empresarial con PLAY Games and Cards, una tienda de videojuegos que tuve en Barcelona durante casi 10 años. Nos reencontramos en el IndieDev Day, y eso fue sinónimo de saldar una deuda pendiente con el tomodachi: grabar un episodio de GAIKAN. Santi nos habla de su primer viaje a Japón, del que ha vuelto entusiasmado. Tanto él como su pareja hicieron un pequeño esfuerzo para aprender un mínimo de japonés antes de ir al país, y en general han quedado más que satisfechos con "Niponlandia". Santi también nos habla de los problemas que enfrentó al volar siendo una persona con sobrepeso, así como algunos detalles que observó en un lugar donde casi todos son delgados, como Japón. Además, expresa su decepción con Osaka... pero no os voy a contar más. Es mejor que lo escuchéis. Podéis escuchar a Santi en "El Legado": https://www.ivoox.com/podcast-legado_sq_f11327842_1.html Gracias a todos por el apoyo. Músicas usadas: -Good Morning Tokyo por milton.(Milton Musical Capsules) | https://freesound.org/people/milton./sounds/79645 Reconocimiento-NoComercial 3.0 España (CC BY-NC 3.0 ES) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/es/ Cambios realizados: Normalización, aparecer y desvanecer progresivamente (Audacity) by Alfonso M. Gonzalez, autor del libro «Amnesia de paz»Escucha este episodio completo y accede a todo el contenido exclusivo de GAIKAN Japan Limited. Descubre antes que nadie los nuevos episodios, y participa en la comunidad exclusiva de oyentes en https://go.ivoox.com/sq/651913
Charlamos con Juan Saez, general manager de Casa Toledo que es un hotel boutique de lujo recientemente abierto en la localidad de La Cumbre en la provincia de Córdoba, Argentina.En la entrevista charlamos con sobre cual es la experiencia de la reciente apertura del hotel y como lo recibió la comunidad y el entorno.Con Juan conversamos sobre la realidad de la industria turística y hotelera del país y la región con sus desafíos, oportunidades y amenazas.Casa Toledo será sin dudas un punto de encuentro entre el turismo y los vecinos de La Cumbre.Turismocero radio es el programa radial del site www.turismocero.com, que desde hace más de 12 años informa sobre la actualidad del turismo en toda Latinoamérica, emitiéndose semanalmente en radios de distintas localidades de Argentina, Uruguay Perú.
Luc 19:1 Habiendo entrado Jesús en Jericó, iba pasando por la ciudad. Luc 19:2 Y sucedió que un varón llamado Zaqueo, que era jefe de los publicanos, y rico, Luc 19:3 procuraba ver quién era Jesús; pero no podía a causa de la multitud, pues era pequeño de estatura. Luc 19:4 Y corriendo delante, subió a un árbol sicómoro para verle; porque había de pasar por allí. Luc 19:5 Cuando Jesús llegó a aquel lugar, mirando hacia arriba, le vio, y le dijo: Zaqueo, date prisa, desciende, porque hoy es necesario que pose yo en tu casa. Luc 19:6 Entonces él descendió aprisa, y le recibió gozoso. Luc 19:7 Al ver esto, todos murmuraban, diciendo que había entrado a posar con un hombre pecador. Luc 19:8 Entonces Zaqueo, puesto en pie, dijo al Señor: He aquí, Señor, la mitad de mis bienes doy a los pobres; y si en algo he defraudado a alguno, se lo devuelvo cuadruplicado. Luc 19:9 Jesús le dijo: Hoy ha venido la salvación a esta casa; por cuanto él también es hijo de Abraham. Luc 19:10 Porque el Hijo del Hombre vino a buscar y a salvar lo que se había perdido.
I dagens episode har Paal Carina Elise Godou og Fernando Saez i studio. De snakker om problemene som kommer med å være alkoholimportører i Norge. Det er små marginer og store bøter for selv de minste feilsteg. De snakker også om hvordan unge i dag drikker mindre alkohol, men ruser seg mer på illegale rusmidler og hvordan det påvirker utelivet. Hvordan jobber de i et så regulert marked og hva gjør de egentlig? Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
This week, Evan and Skyler are joined by Christian Saez of DNVR to discuss the Colorado Rockies at the Winter Meetings in Dallas. The Rockies signed Thairo Estrada to play second base, while general manager Bill Schmidt and skipper Bud Black had plenty of comments about the 2025 squad. Who will hit leadoff? How much will certain guys play? What is the expectation for Kris Bryant? Meanwhile the draft lottery... did not go as expected, and there's a non-zero chance the Rockies could land a certain player from Japan! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Bienvenue dans la 146ème émission Pierres de Touche, programme radiophonique proposé par la Grande Loge Mixte de France et produit et réalisé par RadioDelta. Une émission que nous avons choisi d'intituler : « Les transformations du monde ». Le temps qui change : qu'il s'agisse du climat, qu'il s'agisse de la guerre et des conflits qui surviennent un peu partout dans le monde, qu'il s'agisse du retour de l'antisémitisme ou des menaces sur la laïcité et la liberté d'expression…. Nous avons beaucoup de raisons de nous inquiéter… Une émission que nous dédions spécialement à Samuel Paty dont le procès des assassins vient juste de débuter. Une émission que nous dédions également aux victimes des attentats du 13 novembre 2015. Pour débuter cette émission, Sylvie Lycasion nous propose le portrait de Ferdinand Buisson à l'école de la laïcité. Ferdinand Buisson franc-maçon de la Troisième République fut un ardent défenseur de la laïcité. Pour la rubrique Sexe et littérature, une introduction avec les Doors et Indian Summer. En ce dimanche matin, Isabelle Chibatte nous présente sa réflexion autour de Parfum exotique de Charles Baudelaire. Une chronique qui sera suivie d'Initial B.B. de Serge Gainsbourg. Voici venue l'heure de retrouver Michel Baron pour sa chronique psycho-philo. Aujourd'hui, premier opus de Que transmettre ? Michel Baron Dans le cadre de la rubrique le monde qui vient, notre chroniqueur Pierre Yana nous fait part de ses réflexions après la lecture de l'ouvrage de l'universitaire Gilles Kepel, Après le 7 octobre, le bouleversement du monde. Et pour illustrer la chronique de Pierre Yana : Bob Dylan et The times they are a changing. Petit tour au nord de l'Europe maintenant avec la chronique internationale de William Bres qui nous emmène aux Pays-Bas, un pays sous la menace des changements climatiques. Pour illustrer la chronique à venir, Saez et Enfants paradis. Une chanson hommage qui avait été interprétée lors de la commémoration de l'assassinat de Dominique Bernard à Arras. Alors que – comme nous l'avons déjà dit – se tient le procès des commanditaires de l'assassinat de Samuel Paty, Marc Burlat revient sur le livre de Mickaëlle Paty et Emilie Frèche, le cours de Monsieur Paty. Quels enseignements pour la promotion de la laïcité à l'école, inversion du paradigme et fermeté… autant de sujets qui questionnent Marc Burlat. Cette 146ème édition de notre programme radiophonique touche à sa fin. Merci à l'équipe de chroniqueurs de Pierres de Touche et à Radio Delta. Nous nous quittons avec un hommage aux victimes du terrorisme islamiste. Un hommage mis en musique par Ibrahim Maalouf et interprété par Louane et qui s'intitule Un automne à Paris. Dans trois jours, ce sera le 13 novembre. Nous n'oublions pas les attentats du 13 novembre 2015 à Paris. Conception & animation: Elise Ovart-Baratte Production: Gilles Saulière - RadioDelta Déroulé de l'émission: 00:00:00 Présentation de l'émission - Élise Ovart-Barrate 00:00:55 Chronique Histoire de Franc-maçon : Ferdinand Buisson et l'école de la laïcité - Sylvie Lycasion 00:06:34 Musique : Indian Summer - The Doors 00:08:17 Chronique Mittérature & rockn'roll : Parfum exotique, Baudelaire - Isabelle Chibatte 00:14:38 Musique : Initiales BB - Serge Gainsbourg 00:16:52 Chronique Psycho-philo : Que transmettre ? Partie 1 sur 2 - Michel Baron 00:22:02 Chronique Le monde qui vient : Après le 7 octobre, le bouleversement du monde, Gilles Kepel - Pierre Yana 00:28:18 Musique : The times they are a changing - Bob Dylan 00:31:26 Chronique Internationale : Les Pays-Bas : un état sous la menace du réchauffement climatique - William Bres 00:38:48 Musique : Les enfants Paradis - Saez 00:42:46 Chronique La république vue par MB : Le cours de M. Paty : quels enseignements pour la promotion de la laïcité à l'école, inversion du paradigme et fermeté - Marc Burlat 00:52:26 Fin : Remerciements - Élise Ovart-Barrate 00:53:08 Musique : Un automne à Paris - Louane
Arrancamos la sexta temporada de La Taberna Consciente con una invitada muy especial: Raquel Saez, una mujer única que nos habla de su experiencia como Médium. Raquel ha vivido una vida llena de desafíos y situaciones difíciles de explicar, pero ha aprendido a convivir con lo desconocido. En este episodio, nos cuenta cómo ha sido su día a día con los espíritus, compartiendo anécdotas y vivencias que te van a sorprender. También nos sumergimos juntos en una charla sincera y profunda sobre el más allá y sobre todo lo que Raquel ha ido comprendiendo a través de su propia experiencia. Te dejamos el link a su web para que puedas indagar: https://raquelsaezmedium.es/ Taberner@, no te pierdas este capítulo de inicio de temporada que seguro te va a apasionar, como siempre, en La Taberna Consciente.
Miguel Saez, Sergio Contreras, Mayel - La Cazadora 2 (Andrés Honrubia y Sete Afro Remix) by ANDRES HONRUBIA
Harrison Wind talks with DNVR Rockies beat reporter Christian Saez about his journey to DNVR, his career in broadcasting, covering the Rockies and everything else Denver sports. Start - 0:00Getting to know Christian Saez: 4:33Keys to broadcasting: 20:07Favorite broadcaster: 24:00What's up with the Rockies: 34:10Favorite Nuggets and Nuggets takes: 46:25 An ALLCITY Network Production PARTY WITH US: https://thednvr.com/events ALL THINGS DNVR: https://linktr.ee/dnvrsports MERCH: https://store.allcitynetwork.com/collections/dnvr-locker SUBSCRIBE: https://www.youtube.com/c/DNVR_Sports BUY GOLDEN ERA: Golden Era | Triumph Books Visit Your Front Range Toyota Stores at a location near you - Toyota is the official vehicle of DNVR. Coach Prime wants to help you and other Coloradans be your healthiest selves as the Chief Motivation Officer of UCHealth's Ready. Set. CO challenge. If you want to join the challenge, go to https://www.uchealth.org/readysetco Indeed: listeners of this show will get a $75 SPONSORED JOB CREDIT to get your jobs more visibility at https://indeed.com/allcity. Terms and conditions apply. Need to hire? You need Indeed. This episode is brought to you by BetterHelp. Give online therapy a try athttps://betterhelp.com/dnvr today to get 10% off your first month and get on your way to being your best self.Use code DNVR50 to get 50% OFF your first Factor box and 20% off your next month with any active subscription at https://factormeals.com/dnvr50. Sign up on the Volo app using code DNVR3 to get Volo Pass for only $10/month for the first 3 months. Download the Circle K app and join the Inner Circle or visit https://www.circlek.com/inner-circle! Download the Gametime app, create an account, and use code DNVR for $20 off your first purchase. Terms apply. Check out FOCO merch and collectibles here https://foco.vegb.net/DNVR and use promo code “DNVR10” for 10% off your order on all non Pre Order items. Exclusively for our listeners, Shady Rays is giving out their best deal of the season. Head to https://shadyrays.com and use code: DNVR for 35% off polarized sunglasses. Try for yourself the shades rated 5 stars by over 300,000 people. Rugged Road: Gear up for your next adventure with Rugged Road Coolers - Your ultimate outdoor companion! Head to http://ruggedroadoutdoors.pxf.io/ALLCITY and use code DNVR for 10% off! When you shop through links in the description, we may earn affiliate commissions. Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. bet365: Go to https://www.bet365.com/olp/open-account?affiliate=365_02162536 or use code DNVR365 when you sign up! Must be 21+ and physically located in CO. Please gamble responsibly. If you or someone you know has a gambling problem and wants help call or TEXT 1-800-GAMBLER
Christian Saez of DNVR joins the boys to discuss the Colorado Rockies. Elias Diaz was outrighted - what does that mean? The Rockies Rotation has been Rocky. Support us by Supporting our SponsorsSportsSpyder.com - https://sportspyder.com/mlb/colorado-rockies/news?pid=14774 Daly Controls, LLC - www.dalycontrolsllc.com Grant Hankins - https://x.com/GHankins25 --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/blake-street-banter/support
#169 Alexandre Mergulhão e Pedro Almeida Jorge (pt1/2) - Pagamos impostos a mais em Portugal? Alexandre Mergulhão é economista, formado na Nova SBE, e técnico superior no gabinete de estudos do Ministério das Finanças (GPEARI). É doutorando em Economia Política no Iscte – Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, onde também é professor Assistente Convidado. É autor do estudo “Fiscalidade em Portugal”, de que falámos muito neste episódio, publicado pela Associação Causa Pública, um think-tank que reune diferentes visões vindas da esquerda. Pedro Almeida Jorge é também formado pela Nova SBE e tem carreira na área de auditoria e consultoria fiscal a entidades do setor financeiro. Além disso, é coordenador da biblioteca e das traduções do Instituto Mais Liberdade, um think-tank com uma visão liberal, focado na defesa da liberdade individual e na economia de mercado. O Pedro tem coordenado a publicação de vários livros nesta linha em Portugal, como “Ambientalismo: Uma Visão de Mercado” e “Adam Smith Tinha Razão" de Rainer Zitelmann. -> Apoie este podcast e faça parte da comunidade de mecenas do 45 Graus em: 45grauspodcast.com -> Registe-se para ser avisado(a) de futuras edições dos workshops de Pensamento Crítico: https://forms.sendpulse.com/7e62c1e4f5 _______________ Índice: (0:00) Introdução (06:02) INÍCIO da conversa | Porque há impostos progressivos? | Carga fiscal vs esforço fiscal | Impacto nos incentivos económicos | Taxa efectiva por escalão de rendimento | Esforço fiscal: índices de Bird e de Frank | Progressividade real de um sistema fiscal | Impostos sobre rendimento vs riqueza (39:33) Porque os impostos indirectos (como o IVA) são sempre regressivos | Livro de F. HAyek - Constituição da Liberdade | Relação entre rendimento e felicidade | Joseph Stiglitz | Liberland (59:45) O nosso sistema fiscal incentiva a emigração? | Quem emigra deveria continuar a pagar IRS em Portugal? | Saez, E., & Zucman, G. (2019). The triumph of injustice: How the rich dodge taxes and how to make them pay. | Lei FATCA (EUA) | Partido Libertário (01:09:35) Como medir os serviços que cada um de nós obtém do Estado? (01:22:35 ) IRS: como compara Portugal com outros países? | Estudo Banco de Portugal sobre IRS em Portugal (p 43) | Como é que a nossa fiscalidade impacta o crescimento económico? Tax Wedge (1:30:42) Quanto paga cada escalão de rendimento de IRS em Portugal?| Segurança Social (TSU) | IRS progressivo desincentiva ao trabalho?
D´Veleta, José Saez, Nathan & Felipez, Fangoria, Extremoduro, Antoñito Molina, Migue Benitez, El Canijo de Jerez y más Empezamos la semana cargados de buena música. Disfruta con Estación GNG cada dia de 9:30h a 11h en directo en radio en Murcia , Almeria y Albacete. y luego en reposición disfrutanos en plataformas podcast. Gracias a las más de 7.200 personas que ya os habeis suscrito en iVoox.com
Episode 14 features Cajun music ambassador Ann Savoy as she revisits her collaboration with Linda Ronstadt, one of the '70s legend's last vocal performances. Plus music from LA trio Pacific Sunsets, and producer James Saez talks about Nat King Cole album that's finally seeing the light of day.
Embark on an intellectual exploration with Ridhiamn Balaji, whose insights into the welfare state and socialism challenge the status quo. This episode traverses the European origins of welfare policies, the cautionary stances of Marxists towards state intervention, and the contentious use of the term 'welfare state' in American politics. Balaji, an economist with a deep understanding of Marxology, invites us to reconsider the implications of welfare systems from Bismarck's Germany to FDR's New Deal, while also deconstructing the nebulous concept of neoliberalism and its real-world applications.Unpack theories of capital with a discussion that dives into income inequality and the intricate web of wealth distribution. As we sift through the works of Piketty, Saez, and other luminaries, tax policies and their impact on inequality come to the forefront, offering a fresh lens on the persistent gaps in healthcare, racial wealth, and the overall social welfare landscape. Balaji challenges us to decode socialism's relationship with welfare policies, prompting a critical reevaluation of how we address societal disparities. The dialogue doesn't shy away from the hard-hitting topics, questioning the viability of the welfare state amidst capitalism's evolution and the internal contradictions within leftist movements.Concluding our journey, we navigate the ideological battlegrounds from Marxism to anarchism, scrutinizing their influences on global politics and the complex dynamics within the left. Balaji's upcoming publication in 'Capital and Class' is set to incite further debate, but until its release, listeners can access his thought-provoking work on ResearchGate and Academia.edu. Join us for this episode where we not only challenge your perspectives but also arm you with the intellectual tools to engage in the pursuit of a more equitable society. Support the Show.Crew:Host: C. Derick VarnAudio Producer: Paul Channel Strip ( @aufhebenkultur )Intro and Outro Music by Bitter Lake.Intro Video Design: Jason MylesArt Design: Corn and C. Derick VarnLinks and Social Media:twitter: @skepoetYou can find the additional streams on Youtube
Episode 127 of the Outdoor Minimalist podcast is an open letter to the outdoor industry—a call to action to do more and make less. If you've followed this podcast for a while, you know we are all about environmental action. While I believe individuals can make a difference to achieve more significant impacts, we need the industry to lead the way and decide to do better for the future of our planet and the younger generations. I had a blast chatting with Rick Saez for this episode. While it is a bit different from other conversations we've had on the show, it is one that I think will resonate with how many of us feel about sustainability and the need for broader systemic change. Rick has worked as a Guide and in Sales & Product Development for many of the leading Outdoor and Adventure Travel Brands. He shares advice and insights about working in the Outdoor Industry from his experience and interviews from his popular Outdoor Biz Podcast. INSTAGRAM: https://www.instagram.com/outdoor.minimalist.book/ WEBSITE: https://www.theoutdoorminimalist.com/ YOUTUBE: https://www.youtube.com/@theoutdoorminimalist ORDER THE BOOK: https://www.theoutdoorminimalist.com/book GOFUNDME: Fund the Forever Chemicals 10-Part Podcast LISTENER SURVEY: https://forms.gle/jd8UCN2LL3AQst976 --------------- Rick Saez Outdoor Biz Podcast: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-outdoor-biz-podcast/id1244919639 Website: https://ricksaez.com/ LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ricksaez/ Instagram: @outdoorbizpod --------------- Related Episodes 21. Are We Loving the Land to Death? with Tom Sadler 24. Identifying Your Needs: Adventure, Gear, and Safety with Moose Mutlow 35. Tips for Making More Ethical Gear Purchases with Marie Wilson 54. Why We Need Nature with Kenny Peavy 84. Take Ownership of Your Influence Through Action with Sensi Graves --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/outdoor-minimalist/support
La llegada de Apple Vision Pro nos trae nuevas posibilidades, y también nuevas oportunidades. En este episodio, Pedro Aznar (https://twitter.com/pedroaznar) entrevista a Jose Saez-Merino (https://twitter.com/josesaezmerino) quien nos cuenta cómo hizo el “configurador” de coches Porsche creado en computación espacial que nos alucinó hace unos días en redes. Además, Jose nos cuenta cómo fue capaz de crear una app para iOS desde cero, qué recursos utilizó y cómo los ha aprovechado en esta nueva experiencia para hacerla realidad en visionOS. Episodio patrocinado por Babbel. Entra en https://www.babbel.com/empezar y usa el código CHARLAS para conseguir tus 3 meses gratis. - Las Charlas de Applesfera es el podcast del equipo de Applesfera, donde se trata el gran tema de la semana y su contexto - contado por los expertos que te acompañan en el mundo Apple desde 2006. ✉️ Contacta con el director, Pedro Aznar, en (pedroaznar@applesfera.com) o con el equipo en (editores@applesfera.com). Twitter: https://twitter.com/applesfera Instagram: https://instagram.com/applesfera YouTube: https://youtube.com/applesfera Mastodon: https://mastodon.social/@applesfera ❤️ ¡Gracias por escuchar y apoyar este podcast!
The Sunday Times; tech correspondent Danny Fortson brings on Diego Saez GIl, founder of Pachama, to talk about carbon reduction (4:00), hist first startups (6:10), Pachama's start (12:00), building tools to catalyse climate projects (16:00), how it works (19:10), net zero pledges (22:00), when his house burned down (24:50), the carbon market (27:40), raising $90 million (32:00), and his worst day (36:00). Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
link 01. Brad Fiedel — Terminator 2 Theme 02. Umberto Tozzi — Ti Amo 03. Saez — Mon Européenne 04. Вася Обломов — Теперь далеко отсюда 05. The Cardigans — Erase / Rewind 06. Messer Für Frau Müller — Nightmares 07. Lemon Jelly — Nice Weather for Ducks 08. Мара — Головокружения. Я голосую за … Продолжить чтение Lofstrom loop 364 (01.03.2024)
Meet Camila Saez, an R & D Scientist at Dow. We talk about how she got to data science from science-science (chemical engineering), the interesting process of interviewing for scientific research roles, what problems she gets to work on day to day in the field of material science, and more. Find more at datahumans.club Stuff mentioned in the episode - Camila on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/csaezcab/ Camila's lightning talk at Posit Conf 2023: https://youtu.be/PhNnwfEZRek?si=etqtoRzaWNdN1wee Custom color palette projects that served as inspiration and learning: https://github.com/ciannabp/inauguration https://github.com/karthik/wesanderson Society of Women Engineers: https://swe.org/ Latinas in STEM: https://www.latinasinstem.com/ Fundamentals of Data Visualization by ClausWilke: https://clauswilke.com/dataviz/ R for Data Science byWickham and Grolemund: https://r4ds.had.co.nz/
Steve Saez, directeur général de Reflexe Accident (Izzy Constat), était l'invité de François Sorel dans Tech & Co, la quotidienne, ce lundi 29 janvier. Il s'est penché sur le fonctionnement du premier constat auto intelligent, sur BFM Business. Retrouvez l'émission du lundi au jeudi et réécoutez la en podcast.
Te recomiendo que veas este video antes de escuchar este capítulo. Video "Las Cajas con Pedro Saez" En este episodio platico con Pedro Saez acerca de cómo salirnos de las cajas mentales y de qué manera transformar las etiquetas que nos acompañan.
We have reached the end of 2023, celebrating another stellar season for the Outdoor Adventure Series Podcast.It's a pleasure to close out Season 5 by collaborating with Rick Saez, the Host of the award-winning The Outdoor Biz Podcast. Rick and I will be exchanging two episodes of each others' show. The first will drop the day after Christmas, and the second will drop the day after New Year.While 2023 has not been without its moments, we hope you end the year with your spirits lifted and are ready to take on whatever 2024 has in store.EPISODEEpisode 5053 - Rick interviews Elisabeth Brentano - The Power of Purposeful Projects: Elisabeth Brentano on Conservation and Adventure Travel.LEARN MOREFollow up with Elisabeth by Email or on her website at elisabethbrentano.com.NEXT STEPSIf you enjoy podcasts devoted to the outdoor adventure space, find us online at https://outdooradventureseries.com. We welcome likes and comments, and if you know someone who is also an outdoor enthusiast, go ahead and share our site with them, too.KEYWORDSRick Saez, The Outdoor Biz Podcast, Elisabeth Brentano, Howard Fox, Outdoor Adventure Series, Podcast Interview, OWAA#TheOutdoorBizPodcast #ElisabethBrentano #OutdoorAdventureSeries #PodcastInterview #OWAAPodcast produced using DescriptPodcast hosted by BuzzsproutShow Notes powered by CastmagicWebsite powered by PodpageNote: As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.
We have reached the end of 2023, celebrating another stellar season for the Outdoor Adventure Series Podcast. It's a pleasure to close out Season 5 by collaborating with Rick Saez, the Host of the award-winning The Outdoor Biz Podcast. Rick and I will be exchanging two episodes of each others' show. The first will drop the day after Christmas, and the second will drop the day after New Year. While 2023 has not been without its moments, we hope you end the year with your spirits lifted and are ready to take on whatever 2024 has in store.EPISODEEpisode 5052 - Rick Saez interviews Brittany Coleman - Championing Diversity and Empowering Women: Brittany Coleman on Building ToughCutie.LEARN MOREBrittany's email is bcoleman@toughcutie.com and she can also be found on LinkedIn. The brand can also be found on Instagram and their website, toughcutie.com.NEXT STEPSIf you enjoy podcasts devoted to the outdoor adventure space, find us online at https://outdooradventureseries.com. We welcome likes and comments, and if you know someone who is also an outdoor enthusiast, go ahead and share our site with them, too.KEYWORDSRick Saez, The Outdoor Biz Podcast, Brittany Coleman, Tough Cutie, Howard Fox, Outdoor Adventure Series, Podcast Interview, OWAA#TheOutdoorBizPodcast #ToughCutie #OutdoorAdventureSeries #PodcastInterview #OWAAPodcast produced using DescriptPodcast hosted by BuzzsproutShow Notes powered by CastmagicWebsite powered by PodpageNote: As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.
Au programme de la conversation entre Tania et Mony : 01:05 Pourquoi parle t-on de tendance dans le marketing B2B 02:45 Les grosses tendances et les différences entre France et USA 05:10 DemandGen et cas client 07:20 La différence d'objectifs entre DemandGen et LeadGen 09:10 Une alternative intéressante ? 14:35 Quelles sont les prochaines tendances Mais aussi beaucoup d'autres sujets ! Références abordées : LinkedIn de Tania : https://www.linkedin.com/in/taniasaezf/ -- ⚡ Connecte-toi à Mony ici. -- ❤️ SOUTIENS LE PODCAST 1. Abonne-toi
Today, we're talking mergers. KG Specialties is a Portland-based distributor who, this year, merged with Premier Press. Premier employs over 200 people, and they handle a wide variety of print, fulfillment, and logistics management for clients. Our guests are Kyle Gibson, the owner of KG Specialties and now Director of Promotional Merchandise at Premier, and Premier's Vice President, Manuel Saez.
Katherine Saez is a 22-year Truist veteran and serves as Truist's Georgia Regional President. She received her BSBA from the University of Florida and her MBA from Georgia State. She serves as the senior leader in the Georgia Market. She is responsible for directing and integrating client management business development efforts with privately-held companies operating in business banking, commercial, middle market, and commercial real estate, as well as nonprofit and governmental entities.
Dr. Rasmus comments on a Wall St. Journal report of Sept. 8 admitting that revisions to US data and reports are showing bigger swings in corrections and occurring more often. The show addresses his oft-stated view that the Covid recession fundamentally impacted labor, product and financial markets in ways that US data and statistical reports have not caught up to yet, thus the more frequent and greater revisions to the data. Rasmus explains how JOLT stats (job openings to unemployment ratio), employment surveys, and inflation stats are growing more inaccurate in the post-Covid era. The show then describes how housing, energy, and food prices have begun to rise again and the reasons why Fed interest rate hikes don't have as great an impact on lowering demand and therefore prices. The show ends with a return to the topic of labor exploitation begun a few weeks ago, showing how aggregate data of relative shares, CO to worker pay, productivity, and Prof. Saez data on the income and wealth of richest 1% households in US continues to rise after every recession. (Next week: How Classical Economists from Adam Smith to Marx explained labor exploitation and why exploitation has been intensifying once again under Neoliberalism since 1980 and especially after 2008-09 crash).
Diego Saez Gil is founder and CEO of Pachama. In conversation with Matthew Monahan. Watch this episode on video: https://youtu.be/k_vZhWGU7Zg Watch a preview: https://youtu.be/vDrFkw-gmL8 Pachama: https://pachama.com Diego's Twitter: https://twitter.com/dsaezgil THE REGENERATION WILL BE FUNDED Ma Earth Website: https://maearth.com YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@maearthmedia Community Discord: https://maearth.com/community Podcast Feed: https://feed.podbean.com/theregeneration/feed.xml EPISODE RESOURCES Pachama Originals: https://pachama.com/originals Y Combinator: https://www.ycombinator.com Lowercarbon Capital: https://lowercarboncapital.com SEC Climate-Related Disclosures: https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2022-46 RELATED SEASON 1 INTERVIEWS Troy Carter (Earthshot Labs): https://youtu.be/5DwYAEH3Wto Paul Gambill (Nori): https://youtu.be/6ycyCFLiqi0 Rez (Solid World): https://youtu.be/vVQUg_SBxt4 This interview took place during SF Climate Week 2023: https://www.sfclimateweek.org SOCIAL Farcaster: https://warpcast.com/maearth X / Twitter: https://twitter.com/maearthmedia Lenstube: https://lenstube.xyz/channel/maearth.lens Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/maearthmedia/ Mirror: https://mirror.xyz/maearth.eth LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/maearth/ Lenster: https://lenster.xyz/u/maearth Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/maearthcommunity TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@maearthmedia
Free Forum 09-02-2023 Saez by Progressive Voices
Tourette syndrome-ийн дэлхий дээрхи хамгийн хүнд хэлбэрээр шаналж байгаа Bianca Saez гэх эмэгтэйн түүхийг энэ удаад та бүхэнтэй хуваалцаж, түүний туулсан амьдрал, одоог хүртэлх замналыг хүргэхийг зорьлоо.Bianca saez-ийн тухай documentary:https://youtu.be/-yy6UUncUI0 /60 minutes Australia/Подкастын зочин: У.Минжин https://instagram.com/ulaan_minj?igsh...У.Минжин эмч 2017 онд Хятадын Zhengzhou их сургуулийг Хүний их эмч мэргэжлээр төгссөн. Одоо Монголдоо хөхний хавдрын мэс заслын эмчээр ажилладаг.Манай подкастуудыг Spotify, Apple Podcast, Google Podcast, Amazon music дээр CRIME STATION PODCAST гэж хайлтан дээр бичээд сонсох боломжтой.Instagram: https://instagram.com/crime_station?i... Facebook page: Crime StationBusiness inquiries, please mail to crime.stationpodcast@gmail.comSupport the showwww.minimal-room.comАдминых нь Small business10% discount эдлэх coupon code: Crime station
Las mujeres florecemos cuando estamos en comunidad. Por eso, en el segundo Networking Night de CEO Latinas grabamos un interesante episodio en vivo junto a Sheldry Saez, emprendedora, coach y autora.
Join Judge Ron Rangel and his guest Carmen Tarragona Saez as they discuss the duties of the court interpreter in our criminal justice system.Support the show
All it took was a well made hollandaise sauce for Daniel Saez to switch from life as a lawyer to a life in food. Starting as a culinary chef in his native Venezuela, Daniel eventually made his way to Canada and shifted from culinary to pastry and finally to bread. Now his bakery, Noctua Bread Project in the Junction in Toronto is focused on serving the best possible baked goods to the people in his vibrant, eclectic neighbourhood. In this episode, Daniel shares his story of deciding to leap into food, moving to Canada and overcoming the stresses of opening his own bakery. We also dig into the importance of sticking to one's vision and principles, and using them to guide difficult decisions. Helpful Links Noctua Bread Project @noctuabakery on Instagram Support the Podcast Here! Rise Up! The Baker Podcast website The Bakers4Bakers Community Mark's Blog, with the Bakernomics series Mark on Instagram Credits: Produced and hosted by Mark Dyck Theme song and music by Robyn Dyck Orange Boot Human logo by Fred Reibin
Our guests today are, Diego Saez-Gil of Pachama and Sam Gill of Sylvera, and we're talking about forestry carbon offsets.Forestry carbon offsets were designed as a financial tool to provide an economic incentive for landowners to make alternative decisions, to pay landowners to keep their forests intact in the case of deforestation avoidance credits or to reforest previously damaged land in the case of reforestation credits. The money for this economic incentive comes from large actors who can then take "credit" for their action and apply it against the carbon footprint of their own organization. This is a carbon offset. In the simplest terms, if part of a company cannot decarbonize quickly, but still aims to achieve net-zero emissions, they can pay a forest landowner to preserve their forest and take an agreed upon amount of carbon off their balance sheet accordingly. And it's a relatively new thing. Forestry carbon offsets have become a popular product over the last decade, and like any maturing industry, it has challenges.Diego and Sam are here to walk us through why forests matter, the history of offsets and how they work, some of the challenges highlighted recently, and what they think the path forward looks like. Regardless of what you think of carbon offsets, this is a crucial problem to solve. Without an economic incentive to maintain and regrow the world's forests, any thought of avoiding the worst effects of climate change is out the window. In this episode, we cover: Diego's background and intro to PachamaSam's experience and an overview of SylveraForests in the world today and why they matter for climateRisk of deforestation and the Amazon becoming a self-reinforcing negative feedback loopHow the story of biodiversity has changed from a forestry perspectiveEconomic levers at play with regard to forests, including reforestation and afforestationThe link between forest credits, offsets, and carbon marketsProblems associated with deforestation credits and managing illegal activityThe voluntary market for deforestation credits, who's buying and whyHow deforestation credits are measured now and historicallyMeasuring reforestation and afforestation projectsDiego and Sam's thoughts on a recent article in The Guardian claiming that most forest carbon offsets are worthlessHow Sylvera assesses forest projects and its reaction to The Guardian articlePachama's approach to creating synthetic baselines and validating the uncertainty of predictionsOvercoming challenges through collaborationPredictions for the future of forest carbon marketsGet connected: Cody Simms Twitter / LinkedInDiego Twitter / LinkedInSam Twitter / LinkedIn MCJ Podcast / Collective*You can also reach us via email at info@mcjcollective.com, where we encourage you to share your feedback on episodes and suggestions for future topics or guests.Episode recorded on January 31, 2023
Born in Argentina, Diego Saez-Gil's entrepreneurial journey has taken him from New York to China to San Francisco as he's built companies in the travel, Internet of Things (IoT), and climate-tech industries. Each time he's done so, he's learned to tell the story of his business and has successfully woven his life narrative into his entrepreneurial pitch and story. This has allowed him to raise impressive rounds of capital from some of the savviest investors, including Y Combinator. In this special double episode of FOMO Sapiens, Diego unpacks the ups and downs of his journey and explains how it has informed how he builds each of his businesses. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Born in Argentina, Diego Saez-Gil's entrepreneurial journey has taken him from New York to China to San Francisco as he's built companies in the travel, Internet of Things (IoT), and climate-tech industries. Each time he's done so, he's learned to tell the story of his business and has successfully woven his life narrative into his entrepreneurial pitch and story, including the challenges and the things that just don't go his way. This powerful approach has allowed him to raise impressive rounds of capital from some of the savviest investors, including Y Combinator. In this special double episode of FOMO Sapiens, Diego unpacks the ups and downs of his journey and explains how it has informed how he builds each of his businesses. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Draws in Spanish | Conversations with Latinx Visual Artists and Designers
In this episode, I chat with Chilean Motion Graphic Designer and Illustrator Cristobal Saez. Cristo was raised in Chile and eventually made his way to New York City to attend FIT where he studied graphic design. He quickly realized that branding and logo work just wasn't for him and started creating illustrated GIFs of pop culture moments on his off time. But it was through his work creating this digital fan art that he was able to land a role at a record label creating content and now works at Universal producing visual content for artists such as Beyonce, Adele, and Lil Nas X.Keep on listening to hear us talk about why he chose to move to the US, his experience creating viral fan art, and his advice for breaking into the music industry today.EPISODE LINKS- Watch this Episode on YouTube- Join the Patreon- Host: Follow Fabiola on Instagram, YouTube, TikTok- Guest: Follow Cristo on Instagram and TikTok
The metaverse is expanding and evolving at an unprecedented scale. Nino Saez saw this interconnected virtual world as a chance to monetize his talents and give back to the community through philanthropy work. Joining Jeff Kelley, Eathan Janney, and Josh Kriger, the phil-entrepreneur shares his mission of transforming the metaverse into a utopia through his company aptly called Utopia. Nino talks about his partnership with Deepak Chopra, the importance of constant learning and transparency in revolutionizing Web3, and centralizing his work around serving others. He also opens up about his experiences running a virtual team and the role of community ownership in the digital ecosystem he currently builds.More from Edge of NFT: