Podcasts about data governance act

Live-recording of an Event that took place at University of Vienna on February 27th 2025.The processing and sharing of health data is necessary to advance research of various diseases and health conditions as well as an inseparable part of personalized medicine and the concept of digital health. The European Data Strategy is taking shape with the imminent entry into force of new legal acts, such as the Data Act, Data Governance Act and European Health Data Space. These legislations bring changes to the national healthcare systems and data sharing infrastructures.The aim of this event is to bring together stakeholders in Austria, including researchers, hospitals, clinical practitioners, biobanks, data repositories, Austrian health ministry representatives and policymakers, to discuss the legal landscape, opportunities and challenges surrounding secondary use of health data.Link: https://id.univie.ac.at/news-und-events/detailansicht-news-und-events/news/new-era-for-health-data-secondary-use-of-data-in-the-ehds-and-dga-and-its-implementation-in-europe/

Tenemos pocos meses para adecuarnos al Data Act, que presenta interesantes solapamientos con el RGPD. ¿Cómo adecuar dispositivos en IoT, coches conectados, Smart Cities, Smart Homes, o accesorios destinados a optimizar la salud? Ramon Baradat es un abogado especializado en privacidad y derecho de las TIC (incluyendo comercio electrónico, IA o ciberseguridad) en la oficina de Barcelona de Cuatrecasas. También es autor de diversas publicaciones, docente y ponente, además de coordinar el capítulo de la IAPP en la ciudad condal, conjuntamente con Monica Meiterman, que ya ha estado con nosotros en el canal en inglés.  Referencias: Ramon Baradat en LinkedIn Data Act (Reglamento de 2023 sobre normas armonizadas para un acceso justo a los datos y su utilización) Leonardo Cervera: la protección de datos frente a la inminente avalancha regulatoria (Masters of Privacy) Ramon Baradat: Data Act: nuevas previsiones entre titulares de datos y usuarios Ramon Baradat: Data Act: nuevas previsiones para destinatarios de datos Data Governance Act (Reglamento de 2022 relativo a la gobernanza europea de datos) Directiva 1996 sobre la protección jurídica de las bases de datos Dato inferido o derivado en el ejercicio de portabilidad: directrices 2016 CEPD/EDPB  If This Then That - IFTTT (aplicación de automatización) [EN] Agentes inteligentes con Jamie Smith (Masters of Privacy) [EN] Dan Stone y Icebreaker: cartera para gestionar la propia identidad de forma descentralizada (Masters of Privacy) Espacios europeos comunes de datos

On our latest episode of the Connector podcast, business transformation director Bastien from Dataiku joins us live from Brussels to unravel the evolving landscape of data and AI initiatives. Whether you're a coding expert or prefer a more visual approach, Bastien demonstrates how Dataiku's groundbreaking platform redefines collaboration between data specialists and business professionals. Discover how this unique synergy simplifies the data science process and enhances transparency and trust throughout the AI project lifecycle. With over 600 global clients, including major players like BNP Paribas and Morgan Stanley, DataIQ is leading the charge in preparing organizations for upcoming regulations like the Data Governance Act.Tune in as we explore the profound impact of data collaboration within cross-functional teams and how Dataiku's tools are accelerating and amplifying AI initiatives across various industries. Bastien provides an insightful look into the company's substantial influence in the banking and insurance sectors while also shining a light on their ventures beyond finance. Learn how the platform bridges the gap between AI builders and consumers, enabling businesses to monetize their data and achieve unprecedented scalability in the fast-paced fintech environment. This episode is packed with insights that could transform how your organization leverages its data assets for innovation and efficiency.Thank you for tuning into our podcast about global trends in the FinTech industry.Check out our podcast channel.Learn more about The Connector. Follow us on LinkedIn.CheersKoen Vanderhoydonkkoen.vanderhoydonk@jointheconnector.com#FinTech #RegTech #Scaleup #WealthTech

Irish businesses continue to face challenges in complying with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) six years on from its introduction, according to new research. The findings were presented by Forvis Mazars and McCann FitzGerald LLP in their latest joint survey, "GDPR and Digital Legislation: A Survey of the Impact and Effect on Organisations in Ireland". The research, which was conducted by Ipsos B&A, found that just 15% of businesses consider their organisation to be 'fully compliant' with the legislation, which is billed as the toughest privacy and security law in the world. A further 58% of respondents indicated their organisation was 'materially compliant', and 25% said their organisation was 'somewhat compliant'. In order to achieve their compliance targets, half of the businesses surveyed believe they need more resourcing, financial investments or further expertise in this space. The research also found that 82% of respondents believe the risks associated with GDPR non-compliance are increasing, with respondents citing 'reputational risk' as the most important factor in determining an organisation's data protection risk appetite, followed by 'fear of fines'. Eight in 10 (81%) of the businesses surveyed say they intend to improve their compliance status. This is the eighth edition of the Forvis Mazars and McCann FitzGerald LLP annual survey on the impact of GDPR on organisations in Ireland. As well as examining the latest perceptions among Irish businesses regarding GDPR compliance, the report also assesses awareness and readiness for a wave of new legislative developments from the European Union in response to rapid technological changes. Findings show that 60% of those surveyed are concerned about the impact of new digital legislation on their organisation, which includes DORA (the Digital Operational Resilience Act), the AI Act, the Data Act, the Data Governance Act, the Digital Services Act, the Online Safety and Media Regulation Act, the Digital Markets Act, the Network and Information Security Directive 2 (NIS2) and the Cyber Resilience Act. There is also a high degree of uncertainty regarding the new legislation with many respondents being unsure of their applicability to their business, which suggests further education and awareness is required within organisations. Key Findings: 82% of respondents agree that the risks associated with GDPR non-compliance are increasing, up from 70% in last year's survey. 81% of respondents intend on improving their compliance status. 59% of respondents are concerned about the prospect of being fined for GDPR non-compliance, compared to 58% in last year's survey. 47% of respondents agree that working to comply with GDPR has delivered many benefits for their organisation, up from 34% last year. Over half of the respondents (52%) say that the CEO of their organisation is strongly engaged in GDPR compliance and data privacy, compared to 50% in 2023. Six out of 10 respondents are concerned about upcoming digital legislation. 63% of respondents indicated that the AI Act will apply to their organisation. Liam McKenna, Partner in Consulting Services at Forvis Mazars, said: "This survey underscores the essential need for organisations to remain up to date with both current and forthcoming regulations in the digital space. Irish businesses must diligently maintain their compliance initiatives, particularly amid the significant financial and reputational risks at stake. "Although GDPR regulations were implemented in 2018, that only 15% of Irish companies are fully compliant is a concern for Irish business, particularly in light of further digital legislation coming down the tracks including the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA), AI Act, Data Act, and Digital Services Act, among others. Irish companies therefore need to urgently focus on GDPR adherence, while actively gearing up for new legislative requirements." Paul Lavery, Partner at McCann FitzGerald LLP, added: "The...

Maynooth University's Innovation Value Institute has announced a pioneering initiative, the 'Data Governance Roadmap for Ireland', launched by Minister of State at the Department of Foreign Affairs, Seán Fleming TD, at this year's IVI Summit in Maynooth University. As one of the leading forums for data and digital discussion, the summit brought together international experts, policy leaders, practitioners and researchers over three days to shape the digital agenda on innovation and research. This roadmap aims to foster responsible governance of data and artificial intelligence, leveraging data value as the basis of a sustainable information-enabled and data-informed society. The roadmap will support fair and responsible value sharing from data across society and the development of data capabilities on a national, organisational and individual level, the alignment of data initiatives and standards, and the development and promotion of data literacy. The roadmap will contribute to benefits that span organisations, individuals and wider society in a fair, responsible and human-centred way, that empowers users to share and use data while ensuring the protection of data and privacy concerns. Data and data governance are the lifeblood of the AI revolution, driving innovation and sustainability. Innovative data governance is the enabler, providing the necessary foundation, guidelines and infrastructures to harness the power of data responsibly, ethically and effectively. Speaking on the initiative, Minister Seán Fleming said: "I am proud to launch and strongly support this Data Governance Roadmap for Ireland. It represents a clear vision for responsible governance of data and artificial intelligence, laying the foundation for a sustainable, data-informed society driven by research and innovation." Professor Eeva Leinonen, President of Maynooth University, highlighted the power of collaboration, stating: "This initiative highlights how important universities are in shaping our digital future through research, education, and partnerships. The roadmap sets a new standard for handling data responsibly, and showcases Maynooth University's commitment to Ireland's digital leadership." Professor Markus Helfert, Director of the Innovation Value Institute (IVI) at Maynooth University, emphasised the significance of the initiative, stating: "The Data Governance Roadmap for Ireland is not just a strategic necessity but a critical step towards a future where data serves as a cornerstone for national development and prosperity, supporting technological advancements while safeguarding the rights of data owners and data sharers." Developed in collaboration with experts in data governance, NSAI and members of the EMPOWER team across participating SFI Research Centres, the roadmap adopts a unique three-tiered approach, encapsulating individual, organisational, and national perspectives. It addresses the critical need for robust data governance structures while fostering an environment conducive to innovation and economic growth. Aligned with EU Digital Decade policy targets and several other critical EU initiatives such as the Data Governance Act, Data Act and AI Act the initiative aims to bridge skills gaps and develop new competencies to tackle growing challenges across various sectors, including sustainability, security, and education. The roadmap reflects Ireland's commitment to maintaining leadership in information, data and digital innovation, setting highest standards for governance, promoting transparency, and ensuring equitable distribution of digital benefits that digital and data creates. It sets new benchmarks for success aligned to Ireland's ambition to lead and set standards in Europe, inspiring other nations to follow suit. The report is available at this link: https://ivi.ie/dgri/.

Data Governance Act: Geltung unbeschadet der DSGVO, aber Vorrang der DSGVO im Konflikt Der Data Governance Act ist neben dem Data Act eine weitere Regulierung, die auf das „Sharing“ von Daten abzielt. Er schafft keine Pflicht zum „Sharing“, aber Anforderungen an ein „Sharing“ von Daten. Auf den ersten Blick ein Spannungsverhältnis zur DSGVO oder doch nicht. Dieser Frage geht der Podcast nach! Das weitgreifende Komplettangebot inklusive Formulare zu DSGVO/TTDSG/BDSG im Beratermodul Datenschutzrecht. 4 Wochen gratis nutzen! ottosc.hm/dsgvo

Gast in Folge 44 ist Gamal Moukabary, Gründer und CEO von myWage. Mit Gamal sprechen wir über das Geschäftsmodell von myWage - bei weitem nicht nur Menschen mit geringem Einkommen haben Gründe, den bereits verdienten Arbeitslohn (vorab) ausbezahlt zu bekommen. Gamal berichtet über seine bisherigen Gründungen (u.a. Bonify) und Finanzierungsrunden. Wir sprechen über die Herausforderungen, ein FinTech zu gründen und warum die regulatorischen Vorgaben niemanden abhalten sollten, den Sprung zu wagen. Es geht auch seine Investments und wie er Investmententscheidungen trifft. Außerdem sprechen wir über den Einsatz künstlicher Intelligenz bei FinTechs allgemein und bei myWage im Besonderen. Schließlich geht es um No-Code-Development und warum sich wegen dieses Trends Geschäftsmodelle gerade im FinTech-Umfeld viel schneller testen und umsetzen lassen. In den News geht es um eine größere Finanzierungsrunde, die Dorothea gerade für Mandanten begleitet hat. Wir sprechen über den üblichen Ablauf und die Schwierigkeiten, die sich bei Last-minute-Änderungen bei der Notarin ergeben. Bei Martin geht es wieder um Daten. Allerdings nicht um die DSGVO, sondern um den Data Governance Act und ein Gutachten, das wir für ein öffentliches Unternehmen gefertigt haben. Darin ging es um den Anwendungsbereich des neuen Rechts und um die Folgen. Nach der neuen Verordnung sind Ausschließlichkeitsvereinbarungen über die Datenüberlassung mit einzelnen Unternehmen unzulässig. Wenn Daten mit Unternehmen geteilt werden, müssen diese auch an andere Unternehmen weitergegeben werden.

Aprovechando que ha terminado el periodo de gracia de quince meses para la aplicación del Reglamento de Gobernanza de datos (Data Governance Act), hoy lanzamos una puesta al día rápida de lo que ha pasado en las últimas semanas antes de que se acumulen demasiadas cosas en este otoño vertiginoso. En las categorías habituales:  ePrivacy y novedades legales MarTech y AdTech IA, competencia y mercados digitales PET y Zero-Party Data Futuro de los medios Referencias principales: Masters of Privacy (EN): Entrevista con Eve-Christie Vermynck de Skadden Arps (brechas de seguridad). Masters of Privacy (EN): Entrevista con Cory Underwood de Search Discovery (datos sensibles en la normativa federal y estatal de EEUU). Masters of Privacy (EN): Entrevista con Sille Sepp de MyData Global (en relación al Reglamento de Gobernanza de datos). Cláusulas contractuales modelo de la Comisión Europea para el uso de servicios de inteligencia artificial en el sector público.  Texto completo con más referencias: https://mastersofprivacy.com/es/newsroom-de-octubre-llega-la-dga-instagram-de-pago-y-mmm-2-0/ 

Kun digitaalisten alustajättien valta kasvaa ja alustat muodostavat yhä tärkeämmän osan elämämme infrastruktuuria, kiinnostus alustoja kohtaan herää myös lainsäätäjien keskuudessa. Miten alustojen valtaa oikein suitsitaan? Millainen on Euroopan unionin rooli? Entä millaista työtä tämän alati muuttuvan alan sääntely on? Alustojen valta -podcastin kolmannessa jaksossa väitöskirjaansa tekoälylainsäädännöstä Amsterdamin yliopistossa tekevä Leevi Saari valottaa aikaansa Miapetra Kumpula-Natrin (sd.) kabinetissa Euroopan parlamentissa, jossa hän vastasi digialan sääntelyyn liittyvistä kysymyksistä. Leevi tarjoaa jaksossa ainutlaatuisen kurkistuksen alustojen vallan sääntelyn neuvottelupöytiin ja taistelutantereille. Alustojen valta -podcast on osa Helsingin yliopiston valtiotieteellisessä tiedekunnassa toimivaa tutkimushanketta, jota rahoittaa Helsingin sanomain säätiö. Toimittaja: Matti Ylönen Tuottaja: Toivo Hursti Musiikki: Pasi Savonranta ja Pietu Korhonen   Matin kirja Yhtiövalta alustatalouden aikakaudella (2021) nyt myös äänikirjana! ⁠Kustantajan sivuilla⁠ ⁠Bookbeatissa⁠ ⁠Storytelissä⁠ ja muissa yleisimmissä äänikirjapalveluissa Jakson lukemisto (viittausjärjestyksessä): Saari, L. (2021). Governing What Cannot Be Named – Europe, platform economy and the digital markets act Khan, L. (2017). Amazon's Antitrust Paradox Bradford, A. (2020). The Brussels Effect: How the European Union Rules the World Mainitut EU:n lainsäädäntöhankkeet: Digital Markets Act (DMA) / digimarkkinasäädös Digital Services Act (DSA) /digipalvelusäädös Data Act / datasäädös Data Governance Act  / datahallintasäädös AI Act / tekoälysäädös Cybersecurity Act / kyberturvallisuussäädös European Digital Identity / Eurooppalainen digitaalinen identiteetti Fair Share -debatti Tekstivastine yliopiston sivuilla --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/alustojen-valta/message

Welche Bereiche wird der Data Governance Act der EU regulieren und welche Auswirkungen hat das auf datengetriebene Unternehmen?

Das neue Gold, das neue Öl oder doch etwas ganz anderes? Warum hinken viele der Datenvergleiche auf mehr als zwei Beinen und wie bringt man die Datenökonomie wirklich voran. Gemeinsam mit Günther Tschabuschnig Präsident der Data Intelligence Offensive wagt Christian Krug, der Host des Podcasts „Unf*ck Your Data“ einen Blick nach Österreich, wie es dort voran geht mit der Datennutzung.Die DSGVO jagt den meisten Menschen im Datenbereich einen Schauer über den Rücken. Bürokratisch, kompliziert, unsinnig, ineffektiv. So lauten die gängigen Vorurteile. Nicht so jedoch Günther Tschabuschnig. Für ihn bildet die DSGVO einen Rahmen in den sich die einzelnen Länder und Unternehmen bewegen können.Gerade sind in Österreich der Data Act und Data Governance Act die bestimmenden Themen um der Datenwirtschaft Richtlinie und Hilfestellungen anzubieten. So soll der Austausch und die Nutzung von Daten einfacher, transparenter und sicherer gestaltet werden. Ohne dabei zu hohe Hürden für die Unternehmen zu stellen.Als Schnellboot in Europa kann Österreich hier Vorreiter sein und Dinge verproben. Die Erfolgreichen können dann den Weg in die anderen Länder finden.Dafür ist es aber notwendig, dass wir die Daten und vor allem deren Wert erkennen. Nicht nur den monetären Wert, sondern weit darüber hinaus.So gab es in Österreich für gesundete Coronapatienten ihre Daten zu spenden. Für die Forschung um anderen Menschen zu helfen und die Forschung und Medizin voran zu bringen. Wie eine Blutspende, ein kleiner altruistischer Akt.Hier zeigt sich auch der große Unterschied zu Gold. Daten sind keine endliche Ressource.▬▬▬▬▬▬ Profile: ▬▬▬▬Zum LinkedIn-Profil von Günther: https://www.linkedin.com/in/guenthertschabuschnig/Zum LinkedIn-Profil von Christian: https://www.linkedin.com/in/christian-krug/Unf*ck Your Data auf Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/company/unfck-your-data▬▬▬▬▬▬ Buchempfehlung: ▬▬▬▬Buchempfehlung von Günther: Innovation through Cooperation - Georg WeiersAlle Empfehlungen in Melenas Bücherladen: https://gunzenhausen.buchhandlung.de/unfuckyourdata▬▬▬▬▬▬ Hier findest Du Unf*ck Your Data: ▬▬▬▬Zum Podcast auf Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/6Ow7ySMbgnir27etMYkpxT?si=dc0fd2b3c6454bfaZum Podcast auf iTunes: https://podcasts.apple.com/de/podcast/unf-ck-your-data/id1673832019Zum Podcast auf Google: https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly9mZWVkcy5jYXB0aXZhdGUuZm0vdW5mY2steW91ci1kYXRhLw?ep=14Zum Podcast auf Deezer: https://deezer.page.link/FnT5kRSjf2k54iib6▬▬▬▬▬▬ Kontakt: ▬▬▬▬E-Mail: christian@uyd-podcast.com

Inoltre, un approfondimento sul Data Governance Act, che entrerà in vigore il 24 settembre 2023, e il commento alla sentenza n. 35895/2023 della Cassazione penale, che ha condannato per omicidio colposo due genitori che hanno continuato a curare l'otite del figlio con le prescrizioni dell'omeopata senza avvalersi del pediatra nonostante un grave peggioramento della situazione medica.>> Leggi anche l'articolo: https://tinyurl.com/2yknda8b>> Scopri tutti i podcast di Altalex: https://bit.ly/2NpEc3w

A cura del Prof. Avv. Alessandro del Ninno  --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/key-editore/message

Die Datenschutz-Grundverordnung (DSGVO) beruht auf dem Verbotsparadigma: Das Erheben und Speichern von personenbezogenen Daten ist untersagt, außer es es ist erlaubt. Eine Erlaubnis kann sich nur aus Art. 6 ergeben, in dem die Rechtsgrundlagen definiert sind, also beispielsweise ein "berechtigtes Interesse" oder eine widerrufbare Einwilligung des Dateninhabers. Fällt die Rechtsgrundlage weg, muss der Verantwortliche unverzüglich die erhobenen Daten löschen. Das muss er auch tun, wenn der Dateninhaber von seinem Recht auf "Löschen auf Zuruf" nach Art. 17 DSGVO Gebrauch macht. Diese Gemengelage macht deutlich, auf welch tönernen Füßen datengetriebene Geschäftsmodelle in der EU stehen. Auch die neuen Datengesetze wie der Data Act und Data Governance Act hebeln das Verbotsparadigma nicht aus, sondern müssen sich ihm unterordnen. Hinzu kommt, dass diverse nationale Vorschriften von Behörden und Unternehmen fordern, beispielsweise Verträge und Rechnungen eben nicht zu löschen, sondern innerhalb einer Frist verfügbar zu halten. Zusätzlich gibt es die Pflicht, geschäftliche E-Mails zehn Jahre lang zu archivieren. Außerdem sollen Verantwortliche Backups ihre Datenbestände vorhalten. All diese Ausnahmen deckt Art. 17, Abs. 3 DSGVO. Doch wie soll man das alles praktisch umsetzen; wie löscht man wirklich sicher Daten, um seinen Pflichten nachzukommen? Darüber sprechen Heise-Verlagsjustiziar Joerg Heidrich und Redakteur Holger Bleich in Episode 91 des c't-Datenschutz-Podcasts Auslegungssache. Als kompetenter Gast steht ihnen dabei Dr. Christoph Wegener zur Seite. Wegener ist promovierter Physiker und seit 1999 als freiberuflicher Berater mit der wecon.it-consulting in den Bereichen Informationssicherheit, Datenschutz und Open Source aktiv. Im Podcast erläutert er, welche Methoden er zum Löschen von Daten empfiehlt und gibt hilfreiche Tipps für die Praxis in Unternehmen.

Auch diese Woche gibt es wieder eine Sonderfolge mit Mirjam Steinfeld und Dr. Mathias Grzesiek. Diese Woche geht es um aktuelle Gesetzgebungsvorhaben und Trends aus dem IT-Strafrecht. Frau Steinfeld und Dr. Grzesiek sprechen zunächst über einige relevante Gesetzesentwürfe. Sie beginnen mit dem AI-Act und legen dar, welche Auswirkungen dieser auf mögliche Strafverfahren haben könnte. Sie besprechen danach noch auf den Cyber Resilience Act, den Data Governance Act, die Nis 2 Richtlinie und weitere und erörtern die Relevanz für Compliance Strukturen und Strafverfahren. In einigen Fällen können Sie auf andere Folgen verweisen. Sodann gehen sie noch auf zwei neue Herausforderungen im Bereich der Cyberkriminalität. Sie besprechen, welche Gefahren für Unternehmen bestehen könnten und wie man diesen Gefahren vorbeugen kann. Dabei wird auch beleuchtet, welche Schritte von Behörden in diesen Bereichen getan werden. Zum Schluss geben Sie noch einige Hinweise, wie sich Unternehmen auf zukünftige Herausforderungen im Bereich der Cyber-Compliance vorbereiten können. Hier geht's zu Folge 141: Cyber Resilience: https://criminal-compliance.podigee.io/141-cr Hier geht's zu Folge: 152: EU-Regeln zur Rückverfolgbarkeit von Kryptowerten https://criminal-compliance.podigee.io/152-cr Hier geht's zu Folge 160: Aktuelle Entwicklungen und Handlungserfordernisse im Bereich der Cybersecurity https://criminal-compliance.podigee.io/160-cr Hier geht's zu Folge 161: Steuerhinterziehung und Kryptowährungen https://criminal-compliance.podigee.io/161-cr Hier geht's zu Folge163: Die europäische E-Evidence VO: https://criminal-compliance.podigee.io/163-e-evidence https://www.rosinus-on-air.com https://rosinus-partner.com

Geopolitics has always played a role in prosecuting hackers. But it's getting a lot more complicated, as Kurt Sanger reports. Responding to a U.S. request, a Russian cybersecurity executive has been arrested in Kazakhstan, accused of having hacked Dropbox and Linkedin more than ten years ago. The executive, Nikita Kislitsin, has been hammered by geopolitics in that time. The firm he joined after the alleged hacking, Group IB, has seen its CEO arrested by Russia for treason—probably for getting too close to U.S. investigators. Group IB sold off all its Russian assets and moved to Singapore, while Kislitsin stayed behind, but showed up in Kazakhstan recently, perhaps as a result of the Ukraine war. Now both Russia and the U.S. have dueling extradition requests before the Kazakh authorities; Paul Stephan points out that Kazakhstan's tenuous independence from Russia will be tested by the tug of war.  In more hacker geopolitics, Kurt and Justin Sherman examine the hacking of a Russian satellite communication system that served military and civilian users. It's reminiscent of the Viasat hack that complicated Ukrainian communications, and a bunch of unrelated commercial services, when Russia invaded. Kurt explores the law of war issues raised by an attack with multiple impacts. Justin and I consider the claim that the Wagner group carried it out as part of their aborted protest march on Moscow. We end up thinking that this makes more sense as the Ukrainians serving up revenge for Viasat at a time when it might complicate Russian's response to the Wagner group.  But when it's hacking and geopolitics, who really knows? Paul outlines the legal theory—and antitrust nostalgia—behind the  FTC's planned lawsuit targeting Amazon's exploitation of its sales platform.   We also ask whether the FTC will file the case in court or before the FTC's own administrative law judge. The latter may smooth the lawsuit's early steps, but it will also bring to the fore arguments that Lina Khan should recuse herself because she's already expressed a view on the issues to be raised by the lawsuit. I'm not Chairman Khan's biggest fan, but I don't see why her policy views should lead to recusal; they are, after all, why she was appointed in the first place. Justin and I cover the latest Chinese law raising the risk of doing business in that country by adopting a vague and sweeping view of espionage.  Paul and I try to straighten out the EU's apparently endless series of laws governing data, from General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the AI Act to the Data Act (not to be confused with the Data Governance Act). This week, Paul summarizes the Data Act, which sets the terms for access and control over nonpersonal data. It's based on a plausible idea—that government can unleash the value of data by clarifying and making fair the rules for who can use data in new businesses. Of course, the EU is unable to resist imposing its own views of fairness, thus upsetting existing commercial arrangements without really providing any certainty about what will replace them. The outcome is likely to reduce, not improve, the certainty that new data businesses want.  Speaking of which, that's the critique of the AI Act now being offered by dozens of European business executives, whose open letter slams the way the AI Act kludged the regulation of generative AI into a framework where it didn't really fit. They accuse the European Parliament of “wanting to anchor the regulation of generative AI in law and proceeding with a rigid compliance logic [that] is as bureaucratic …  as it is ineffective in fulfilling its purpose.” And you thought I was the EU-basher.  Justin recaps an Indian court's rejection of Twitter's lawsuit challenging the Indian government's orders to block users who've earned the government's ire. Kurt covers a matching story about whether Facebook should suspend Hun Sen's Facebook account for threatening users with violence. I take us to Nigeria and question why social media thinks governments can be punished for threatening violence. Finally, in two updates, I note that Google has joined Facebook in calling Canada's bluff by refusing to link to Canadian news media in order to avoid the Canadian link tax.  And I do a victory lap for the Cyberlaw Podcast's Amber Alert feature. One week after we nominated the Commerce Department's IT supply chain security program for an Amber Alert, the Department answered the call by posting the supply chain czar position in USAJOBS. Download 466th Episode (mp3) You can subscribe to The Cyberlaw Podcast using iTunes, Google Play, Spotify, Pocket Casts, or our RSS feed. As always, The Cyberlaw Podcast is open to feedback. Be sure to engage with @stewartbaker on Twitter. Send your questions, comments, and suggestions for topics or interviewees to CyberlawPodcast@gmail.com. Remember: If your suggested guest appears on the show, we will send you a highly coveted Cyberlaw Podcast mug! The views expressed in this podcast are those of the speakers and do not reflect the opinions of their institutions, clients, friends, families, or pets.  

Geopolitics has always played a role in prosecuting hackers. But it's getting a lot more complicated, as Kurt Sanger reports. Responding to a U.S. request, a Russian cybersecurity executive has been arrested in Kazakhstan, accused of having hacked Dropbox and Linkedin more than ten years ago. The executive, Nikita Kislitsin, has been hammered by geopolitics in that time. The firm he joined after the alleged hacking, Group IB, has seen its CEO arrested by Russia for treason—probably for getting too close to U.S. investigators. Group IB sold off all its Russian assets and moved to Singapore, while Kislitsin stayed behind, but showed up in Kazakhstan recently, perhaps as a result of the Ukraine war. Now both Russia and the U.S. have dueling extradition requests before the Kazakh authorities; Paul Stephan points out that Kazakhstan's tenuous independence from Russia will be tested by the tug of war.  In more hacker geopolitics, Kurt and Justin Sherman examine the hacking of a Russian satellite communication system that served military and civilian users. It's reminiscent of the Viasat hack that complicated Ukrainian communications, and a bunch of unrelated commercial services, when Russia invaded. Kurt explores the law of war issues raised by an attack with multiple impacts. Justin and I consider the claim that the Wagner group carried it out as part of their aborted protest march on Moscow. We end up thinking that this makes more sense as the Ukrainians serving up revenge for Viasat at a time when it might complicate Russian's response to the Wagner group.  But when it's hacking and geopolitics, who really knows? Paul outlines the legal theory—and antitrust nostalgia—behind the  FTC's planned lawsuit targeting Amazon's exploitation of its sales platform.   We also ask whether the FTC will file the case in court or before the FTC's own administrative law judge. The latter may smooth the lawsuit's early steps, but it will also bring to the fore arguments that Lina Khan should recuse herself because she's already expressed a view on the issues to be raised by the lawsuit. I'm not Chairman Khan's biggest fan, but I don't see why her policy views should lead to recusal; they are, after all, why she was appointed in the first place. Justin and I cover the latest Chinese law raising the risk of doing business in that country by adopting a vague and sweeping view of espionage.  Paul and I try to straighten out the EU's apparently endless series of laws governing data, from General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the AI Act to the Data Act (not to be confused with the Data Governance Act). This week, Paul summarizes the Data Act, which sets the terms for access and control over nonpersonal data. It's based on a plausible idea—that government can unleash the value of data by clarifying and making fair the rules for who can use data in new businesses. Of course, the EU is unable to resist imposing its own views of fairness, thus upsetting existing commercial arrangements without really providing any certainty about what will replace them. The outcome is likely to reduce, not improve, the certainty that new data businesses want.  Speaking of which, that's the critique of the AI Act now being offered by dozens of European business executives, whose open letter slams the way the AI Act kludged the regulation of generative AI into a framework where it didn't really fit. They accuse the European Parliament of “wanting to anchor the regulation of generative AI in law and proceeding with a rigid compliance logic [that] is as bureaucratic …  as it is ineffective in fulfilling its purpose.” And you thought I was the EU-basher.  Justin recaps an Indian court's rejection of Twitter's lawsuit challenging the Indian government's orders to block users who've earned the government's ire. Kurt covers a matching story about whether Facebook should suspend Hun Sen's Facebook account for threatening users with violence. I take us to Nigeria and question why social media thinks governments can be punished for threatening violence. Finally, in two updates, I note that Google has joined Facebook in calling Canada's bluff by refusing to link to Canadian news media in order to avoid the Canadian link tax.  And I do a victory lap for the Cyberlaw Podcast's Amber Alert feature. One week after we nominated the Commerce Department's IT supply chain security program for an Amber Alert, the Department answered the call by posting the supply chain czar position in USAJOBS. Download 466th Episode (mp3) You can subscribe to The Cyberlaw Podcast using iTunes, Google Play, Spotify, Pocket Casts, or our RSS feed. As always, The Cyberlaw Podcast is open to feedback. Be sure to engage with @stewartbaker on Twitter. Send your questions, comments, and suggestions for topics or interviewees to CyberlawPodcast@gmail.com. Remember: If your suggested guest appears on the show, we will send you a highly coveted Cyberlaw Podcast mug! The views expressed in this podcast are those of the speakers and do not reflect the opinions of their institutions, clients, friends, families, or pets.  

Wir sprechen mit Prof. Dr. Bertram Lomfeld. Er ist Professor für Privatrecht und Grundlagen des Rechts an der Freien Universität Berlin und forscht und lehrt u.a. zu (Grund-)Fragen des Eigentums. Wir diskutieren über Eigentumskonzepte und darüber. ob es so etwas wie ein Eigentum an Daten gibt oder geben soll, wem es zukommt und wie der Zugang zu Daten (in Europa) neu geregelt wird - etwa durch den Data Act, den Data Governance Act und den European Health Data Space Act. Links: https://www.jura.fu-berlin.de/fachbereich/einrichtungen/zivilrecht/lehrende/lomfeldb/index.html https://www.jura.fu-berlin.de/en/forschung/fuels/Projects/The-Grammar-of-Property-Regimes/index.html https://www.arte.tv/de/videos/RC-023187/die-welt-und-ihr-eigentum/

Welcome to another episode of "AI Lawyer Talking Tech", your daily review of legal technology news. Today, we will be discussing the latest developments in the legal industry, including Shearman Sterling's ongoing efforts to refine and rightsize the firm in light of changing client demand, as well as the recent enactment of the EU Data Governance Act. We will also be covering the latest advancements in legal research software. So tune in and stay up to date on the latest legal tech news. Shearman & Sterling Implements Further Staff Reductions in Latest Cost-Cutting MoveDate: 13 Apr 2023Source: JDJournal The reuse and transfer of data held by public sector bodies under the EU Data Governance ActDate: 13 Apr 2023Source: Hogan Lovells 9 signs it's time to upgrade your legal research softwareDate: 13 Apr 2023Source: Legal.ThomsonReuters.com Legal practice areas: Ready to say yes to unexpected client requests?Date: 13 Apr 2023Source: Legal.ThomsonReuters.com A view from Brussels: EDPB hammers at transborder data flow, ChatGPTDate: 13 Apr 2023Source: IAPP.org A South Carolina Legal Technology Case is Likely Headed to the Supreme Court – Why You Should CareDate: 13 Apr 2023Source: Law Technology Today President's Message: The Importance of Embracing and Understanding Advances in TechnologyDate: 13 Apr 2023Source: New York State Bar Association Is ChatGPT Up To the Task of Formatting Bluebook Legal Citations?Date: 13 Apr 2023Source: LawSites UnitedLex Named Data Solution of the Year for Legal by Data BreakthroughDate: 13 Apr 2023Source: InvestorsObserver Robot Lawyers Are About to Flood the CourtsDate: 13 Apr 2023Source: Wired News States act to curtail kids online, raising pressure on Congress (copy)Date: 12 Apr 2023Source: Pantagraph.com BYU Law Partners with Top Corporate Law Firms to Broaden Scope of Spring 2023 Academies ProgramDate: 12 Apr 2023Source: Utah Business Magazine Copyright Office Artificial Intelligence Initiative and Resource GuideDate: 12 Apr 2023Source: LexBlog The Proposal of Chat-GPT for an “AI Guardian” to Protect Privacy in Legal CasesDate: 12 Apr 2023Source: EDRM The Future of AI within LexisNexis and the Legal Industry with Lexis CTO Jeff Reihl – TGIR Ep. 197Date: 13 Apr 2023Source: 3 Geeks and a Law Blog Prison Warden Says: ‘Lock The Emojis Up.' Court Replies: ‘Free the Emojis'–Taliani v. DortchDate: 13 Apr 2023Source: Technology & Marketing Law Blog Why Attorneys Should be “Crypto-Literate” and the Evolving Crypto Regulatory Environment (Hailey Lennon & Preston Byrne – Brown Rudnick)Date: 13 Apr 2023Source: Technically Legal - A Legal Technology and Innovation Podcast

Die europäische Datenstrategie bringt eine Menge an neuen Regelungen mit sich: Digital Markets Act, Digital Services Act, Data Governance Act, Data Act, AI Act, ePrivacy Verordnung und NIS2 Richtlinie sind Begriffe, die oft genannt werden. Heiko Gossen hat in dieser Folge Max Hermann zu Gast. Max Hermann ist Syndikusrechtsanwalt und Lead Counsel bei der EnBW Energie Baden-Württemberg AG im Team Recht Markt, Datenschutz und digitale Geschäftsmodelle. Außerdem ist er als Lehrbeauftragter im Datenschutzrecht an der TH Köln tätig. Gemeinsam strukturieren sie die Themen und bringen ein wenig Licht in den Vorhaben-Dschungel aus Datenschutzperspektive. Weitere Infos, Blog und Newsletter finden Sie unter: https://migosens.de/newsroom/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/DS_Talk Übersicht aller Themenfolgen: https://migosens.de/datenschutz-podcast-themenfolgen/ (als eigener Feed: https://migosens.de/show/tf/feed/ddt/) Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/datenschutztalk_podcast/ Folge hier kommentieren: https://migosens.de/podcast/ TeamDatenschutz #TeamInfoSec #DSTalk

Entretien exceptionnel avec Étienne Drouard, France Charruyer et Nicholas Cullen sur l'impact de la réglementation sur les données en Europe et sur la compétitivité pour les entreprises au niveau national. 5 ans après, quel bilan pour la protection des données, le niveau de conformité des entreprises et le rôle de la CNIL . Le RGPD, le paquet digital annoncé pour 2023 avec le Data Act, le Data Governance Act et l'IA Act ne vont-ils pas manquer leur cible ? Va-t-on assister à une guerre des régulateurs en Europe ? Comment assurer un équilibre entre usage, liberté d'entreprendre et protection des droits fondamentaux ? Quelle vision stratégique pour l'EU dans la guerre de la donnée et de l'IA compétitive ? Découvrez ce nouvel épisode des Causeries Data avec des praticiens de la donnée au service des interrogations des entreprises et de l'attractivité de nos territoires. Entretien entre :  Étienne DROUARD Avocat associé Hogan & Lovells, ancien membre de la CNIL, il a contribué à la rédaction des directives "ePrivacy" et du RGPD. France CHARRUYER Présidente de l'association d'intérêt général Data Ring, avocat associé ALTIJ, chargée d'enseignements à l'université Paris Dauphine-PSL et Toulouse Business School, déléguée à l'innovation et au numérique de l'Ordre des Avocats de Toulouse. Nicholas CULLEN Avocat associé ALTIJ, Solicitor of England and Wales, DPOHébergé par Ausha. Visitez ausha.co/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

Il Data Governance Act rappresenta uno dei principali elementi innovativi all'interno del nuovo ecosistema digitale europeo. Vediamo insieme a Sergio Amato e Alessia Ajelli, oggi nuovamente al bancone di The Bar, quali novità e opportunità possono scaturire dall'applicazione del nuovo Regolamento UE 2022/868 e, allo stesso tempo, quali tutele saranno garantite all'interno del nuovo sistema di condivisione e di riutilizzo dei dati nei confronti dei vari soggetti interessati.

Dott. Chiara Rustici discusses the  Data Governance Act, Open Data Directive, Digital Markets Act, Digital Services Act how they fit together and look at applicable and upcoming data regulation in the EU and tries and draw some conclusions on what that means for business /revenue models and operating models of data-rich businesses. Dott. Chiara Rustici is a legal analyst and IT law expert with a focus on the new Brussels-Washington digital regulation drive. She is an independent legal scholar affiliated with the Department of Information Engineering, Electronics and Telecommunications (DIET) of La Sapienza University, in Rome. She was elected Chair of the Law Specialist Group at the BCS, formerly known as British Computing Society and ranked among the top 20 GDPR experts by the GDPR institute, a Swiss membership body for professional data protection practitioners. She is a soight after conference speaker and is widely quoted and published on both sides of the Atlantic. She runs her consultancy and research activities between London, Rome and the Italian Alps.Dott. Chiara Rustici  can be contacted via Linkedin herehttps://www.linkedin.com/in/chiararustici/

This week on Serious Privacy, Paul Breitbarth and K Royal speak with Yannick Vogel. Yannick was one of the finalists of the 6th EDPL Young Scholar Award 2022, as well as a PhD student hoping to obtain a Joint International Doctoral Degree in Law, Science and Technology. His paper, titled “Stretching the Limit, The Functioning of the GDPR's Notion of Consent in the context of Data Intermediary Services” looks ahead at one of the new European laws that are entering into force shortly as part of the EU Digital Single Market: the Data Governance Act. This law should make it easier to share personal data, especially between the public and the private sector. What it all entails, and what consent has got to do with it, we'll discuss with Yannick in this week's episode.Previous Young Scholar Award episodes:Pervasive Interference: A chat about Purpose Limitation (with Isabel Hahn)It's Not All About You: DNA and Group Privacy (with Taner Kuru)You have the Right to Rights in Law Enforcement (with Katherine Quezada Tavárez)As always, please feel free to share your thoughts with us - there will be a year end show on the best episodes. Get your vote counted! Follow us on LinkedIn as Serious Privacy and on Twitter @podcastprivacy @EuroPaulB and @HeartofPrivacy. 

While the European Union is developing the Data Act, the Data Governance Act and the Artificial Intelligence (AI) Act, the issue of the data governance remains at the fore. In today's podcast, we will try to answer some of these questions: What are the policy options for Europe's data governance framework, especially with regard to AI, that align with a data justice perspective? How to foster a positive vision of AI as contributing to public goods and creating public value? How to recognise the rights and interests of different communities in data? To what extend is it possible to foresee risks and vulnerabilities when legislating on digital? We will address these questions with the help of Pernille Weiss, Member of the European Parliament's Committees on Industry, Research and Energy and on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety, and Linnet Taylor, Associate Professor of Data Ethics, Law and Policy at the Tilburg Institute for Law, Technology, and Society (TILT), where she leads the Global Data Justice project. This podcast is third in the 2022 podcast series on Artificial intelligence brought to you by the OECD's Global Parliamentary Network and the European Parliament's Panel for the Future of Science and Technology, also known as STOA. Guests: Linnet Taylor, Pernille Weiss Host: Christopher Mooney Producer: Samia Basille To learn more about the European Parliament's Panel for the Future of Science and Technology's work on AI, go to: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/stoa/en/home/highlights To learn more about the OECD Global Parliamentary Network, go to: https://www.oecd.org/parliamentarians/ To learn more about the OECD's work on AI, go to: oecd.ai

Pool CEO Shiv Malik - a technologist, award-nominated broadcaster, author of two books, former Guardian investigative journalist, and co-founder of the Intergenerational Foundation think tank joins me on Tech Talks Daily. UK-based Pool, currently valued at $39m, is building a data marketplace and associated payment rails for new data-sharing entities called data unions. These new data-sharing organisations seek to leverage shifts in privacy, the end of consumer data following Chrome's deletion of third-party cookies, and new EU rules for data portability which are due to come into effect next year. The most powerful companies on Earth are those who monopolise vast swaths of humanity's information. Pool's purpose is to redistribute the control and value of that knowledge and thereby completely reconstitute power relationships in the political economy of the 21st century. I learn how Pool is doing this by taking an old-fashioned organisational structure - the trust - and evolving it with Web3 technology to make it fit for the digital era. This straightforward model allows Data Unions to align incentives around data creation. It's why the model is backed not just by EU regulators through the upcoming Data Governance Act.

Der Hamburgische Beauftragte für Datenschutz und Informationsfreiheit (BfDI) steht stets im Fokus der Öffentlichkeit. Seiner Aufsicht unterliegen nicht nur die deutschen Niederlassungen von Meta (ehemals Facebook) und Google, sondern auch etliche große deutsche Medienhäuser, etwa der Springer-Konzern. Mit Spannung war daher im vergangenen Jahr erwartet worden, wer dem scheidenden, langjährigen BfDI Johannes Caspar folgen wird. Im November 2021 übernahm der Jurist Thomas Fuchs nach seiner Wahl durch die Hamburger Bürgerschaft das Amt. Fuchs war zuvor 13 Jahre lang Direktor der Medienanstalt Hamburg/Schleswig-Holstein. Er ist also im Bereich der behördlichen Aufsicht kein Unbekannter. In der aktuellen Episode 67 des c't-Datenschutz-Podcasts erzählt er von seinen ersten Monaten als oberster Hamburger Datenschützer. Fuchs betont, dass er einen kooperativen Ansatz seiner Behörde in den Vordergrund stellt. Datenschutz sei in den vergangenen vier Jahren vorwiegend als das "scharfe Schwert", die Drohung mit dem Bußgeld, wahrgenommen worden. Es gebe aber ein großes Bedürfnis nach demokratischer Datennutzung, etwa für Forschung und Mobilität: "Das möchte ich von Anfang an begleiten", betont Fuchs. Als Beispiel für verfehlte Regulierung nennt er die Pläne zu einem Impfregister: "Wir haben in der Coronapandemie brutalen Datenmangel. Viele haben gesagt, ein Impfregister geht datenschutzrechtlich nicht. Ich würde sagen: Das ginge sehr wohl datenschutzkonform, wenn klar geregelt würde, wer darauf zugreifen darf." Das Werk seines Vorgängers will Fuchs fortführen: "Wir beschäftigen uns weiterhin intensiv mit Meta und Google, und wir haben auch noch Einfluss auf die Entscheidungen, die allerdings in Irland getroffen werden." Fuchs ist guter Dinge, dass die irische Datenschutzbehörde als in der EU zuständige Aufsicht über die großen Tech-Konzerne gerade die Zügel anzieht. "Eine Entscheidung zur Datenübermittlung von Facebook in die USA steht beispielsweise unmittelbar bevor." Bauchschmerzen bereitet Hamburgs neuem BfDI die Ausformulierung der EU-Datenstrategie. Gesetze wie der Data Act oder der Data Governance Act seien zwar für sich genommen "spannend und relevant". Aber es sei "schlicht eine Katastrophe", dass sie keine Ausnahmen zur DSGVO enthalten, sondern komplett mit ihr in Einklang zu bringen sind: "Künftig dürften noch mehr Projekte gar nicht erst in Angriff genommen werden, aus Angst davor, irgendwie gegen Datenschutzrecht zu verstoßen." Die DSGVO müsse sich in einen Binnenmarkt einbetten, der auch Wirtschaftsinteressen berücksichtigt, sonst sei sie nicht zukunftsfähig.

Recent development I On 3 June 2022, the Data Governance Act (DGA) was published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The DGA will enter into force on 23 June 2022 and will be applicable for companies 15 months later. The adopted text is available online here.

Is the EU providing the legal framework for data-driven value creation?Digitalization is a focus area for the European commission, and at its core, the European digital strategy is a data strategy - digitalization is focused on data.The goal is to utilize the value of data and give better conditions to SMB in the European marked.I was fortunate to talk to Astrid Solhaug from DigDir, working for the Norwegian resource center for sharing and use of data. Astrid provides both a Norwegian and European perspective on the topic.We talked about:Eu digitalization strategyWhat does that mean?How does the EU approach digitalization at a strategic level?How do regulations and incentives interplay with digitalization in the EU?Eu regulationsWhat are EU Data Act, Open Data Directive, Data Governance Act?How can we share and reuse data? What does it mean for value creation with data?Why do we need a data innovation board and what should it look like?ChallengesCan the market be regulated? Is EU regulation harming innovation in the marked?How can ethnical values be regulated across countries? Is the EU trying to take an active role in the development of European society?PossibilitiesWhat are the possibilities in these regulations? Can it mean safe and easy data sharing?What are the effects of simpler easier data sharing between the public and private sector? Can it create value for us?What are the opportunities in the regulations for users in Norway? What I've learned:EU is trying to take an active part in democratize data.EU defines data is a non-competitive good.A data collector has no exclusive rights to the data collected.All open governmental data should be accessible for everyoneThe Data Act arranges for private sector data, to secure sharing and end user rights.Private organizations will have a duty to share information with public sector in times of crisisThese three regulations for sharing data are interesting to see in combination with the AI Act, that ensures use of data that now is available.

Recent development On 6 April 2022, the European Parliament adopted the Data Governance Act. As part of the European Data Strategy, the Act will become law after it is adopted by the Council of the European Union.

Sandro Gozi è l'ospite dello speciale Recap - IntervEU di questa settimana. Emiliano-romagnolo, classe 1968, Gozi è stato Consigliere del Primo Ministro francese Édouard Philippe nel 2019, Sottosegretario di Stato agli affari europei nei governi Renzi e Gentiloni. Oggi è un eurodeputato di Renew Europe eletto in Francia nella lista Renaissance promossa da Emmanuel Macron. Al Parlamento europeo fa parte della commissione per il mercato interno e la protezione dei consumatori e di quella per gli affari costituzionali. Con lui abbiamo parlato del Digital Services Act, del Digital Markets Act e del Data Governance Act. Abbiamo trattato insieme anche delle elezioni in Francia e della presidenza francese del Consiglio dell'UE. Infine non abbiamo mancato di chiedergli del MEP bulgaro che ha fatto il saluto fascista dopo aver litigato proprio con Gozi durante la plenaria. Conducono Simone Pavesi e Nadiya Antentyk

Heute mit: Data Governance Act, Cookie-Banner, DeLorean, Max Payne

Recent development On 23 February 2022, the European Commission proposed the draft Data Act, which is part of the European Data Strategy together with the Data Governance Act. With the Data Act, the European Commission aims to increase access to data and provide a fair environment for the use of data.

Killer, Achimwww.deutschlandfunk.de, Forschung aktuellDirekter Link zur Audiodatei

Though many privacy pros are still grappling with the EU General Data Protection Regulation, the EU is now busy leading a new generation of data regulations. As part of its Digital Single Market strategy, the EU is looking to not only protect data but also to create frameworks that allow for data flows, while aiming to mitigate hate speech and misinformation. Through an ambitious line of of proposed laws – including the Data Act, Data Governance Act, Digital Markets Act, Digital Services Act and the AI Act – the EU is poised to place a slew of new requirements for companies doing business in the region. Though not all privacy-related, privacy pros should be paying attention to this space. To catch up on this flurry of activity, IAPP Editorial Director recently chatted with journalist Luca Bertuzzi.  

On 1 October 2021, the general approach to the Data Governance Act was adopted by European Union Ambassadors. A negotiation mandate was also issued for negotiations of the European Union Commission and the Parliament. The Data Governance Act is a legislative proposal published by the European Commission on 25 November 2020 as part of the European Data Strategy

La Commissione Europea ha presentato la sua proposta per il Data Governance Act, un regolamento per creare regole comuni con cui far circolare i dati all'interno dell'Unione Europea e che favorisce il riuso di dati in possesso della Pubblica Amministrazione. Vincenzo Tiani ne parla nel #PanettaPaper di oggi.-----------Link utili: