Podcasts about max h

Penny meets an old friend, Leyland finds their family, and Olivier takes flight. The theme of tonight's episode is Reunions.(To avoid spoilers, content warnings are listed at the end of this episode description).The bonus story that goes with this episode is ‘Flotsam', and is available for Hallowoods patrons on the show's Patreon, along with behind-the-scenes, exclusive merchandise, and more! Because the show runs without ads or sponsors, we rely on support from fans to guarantee the survival of this LGBTQ+ horror podcast.Hello From The Hallowoods is written and produced by William A. Wellman, a queer horror author. You can visit their website for more information! The transcript for this episode is available on the Hello From The Hallowoods Website. Click here to read!You can also find Hello From The Hallowoods on social media! The show is on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter at @thehallowoods. If you'd like to connect with other fans of the show, there's even a fan-run Discord Server!Music for this episode was used under license from Artlist.com. The soundtracks featured were: ‘Rhea', by Yehezkel Raz,‘Morning Sunbeams', by Yehezkel Raz,‘Lost Are We', by Alon Peretz,‘Autumnal Smile', by Nocturne Samurai,‘The Peruvian Protest', by Max H., ‘Five Sense Prison', by Roie Shpigler, ‘The Sacred Union', by Shahead Mostafafar,‘Quantum', by ANBR, ‘A Moon Walk', by Yehezkel Raz,‘Space Sauce', by Bunker Buster,‘Lapetus', by Yehezkel Raz,‘Effoliation', by Sea,‘All Is One', by The Places,‘Lost', by Lars Bork Anderson,‘For the Broken Hearted', by Yehezkel Raz,‘Candle in the Dark', by Tommy H. Brandon,‘Waiting', by Laurel Violet,‘A Lovely Day For a Walk', by Jon Gegelman, ‘Titan', by Yehezkel Raz,‘Tuesday', by Aija Alsina,‘A Touch of Dream', by Max H., ‘Days Pass', by ANBR,‘Rhea', by Yehezkel Raz,And ‘Farewell', by Maya Belsitzman and Matan EphratContent warnings for this episode include: Abuse, Animal death (many spiders), Self-harm, Violence, Kidnapping and abduction, Death + Injury, Blood, Spiders, Gun Mention, Strangulation/suffocation, Static (including sfx). Emotional Manipulation, Drowning, Bugs, Body horror, Child exposed to child-eating entity for science, mob violence

Er hat die Kunst der Tontechnik studiert, seine Doktorarbeit über Aspekte von Wittgensteins Werk geschrieben und dann – was nicht viele wissen! – die Herrschaft über das Grazer Literaturhaus übernommen. Max Höfler ist ein sprachgewaltiger, geistreicher und zugleich heiterer Zeitgenosse, der heuer beim Bachmann-Wettlesen in Klagenfurt dabei sein wird. Wir zitieren zum Beweis aus einem Text von Höfler ganz zu Beginn und aus einer Sendung von Ö1 circa in der Mitte unserer Show. Wir erörtern im Gespräch außerdem, wie es mit dem Lil Franz weitergeht, Höflers musikalischem Alter Ego, was ein Symbolarbeiter sein könnte und warum er bei der Einreise in die USA mit gröberen Schwierigkeiten rechnet. Vielleicht rettet ihn am Ende doch sein fliederfarbenes André-Rieu-Crew-Shirt?

Hope gets to safety, Buck bargains with the Saint, and Loris finds her calling. The theme of tonight's episode is Saints.(To avoid spoilers, content warnings are listed at the end of this episode description).The bonus story that goes with this episode is ‘Communion', and is available for Hallowoods patrons on the show's Patreon, along with behind-the-scenes, exclusive merchandise, and more! Because the show runs without ads or sponsors, we rely on support from fans to guarantee the survival of this LGBTQ+ horror podcast.Hello From The Hallowoods is written and produced by William A. Wellman, a queer horror author. You can visit their website for more information! The transcript for this episode is available on the Hello From The Hallowoods Website. Click here to read!You can also find Hello From The Hallowoods on social media! The show is on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter at @thehallowoods. If you'd like to connect with other fans of the show, there's even a fan-run Discord Server!Music for this episode was used under license from Artlist.com. The soundtracks featured were: ‘Rhea', by Yehezkel Raz,‘Morning Sunbeams' by Yehezkel Raz,‘Waiting and Hoping', by Lance Conrad, ‘Dark Silence', by Piotr Hummel,‘The Art of Connection', by Ardie Son,‘A Moon Walk', by Yehezkel Raz,‘King's Requiem', by Alon Peretz,‘Come Back Home', by Ardie Son,‘For the Broken Hearted', by Yehezkel Raz,‘Quantum', by ANBR,‘Run With Wolves', by Ardie Son,‘Our Story So Far', by Jakub Pietras,‘Witch's Brew', by CK Martin,‘Titan', by Yehezkel Raz,‘Infernos Laissez Vibre', by Yehezkel Raz,‘A Touch of Dream', by Max H., ‘Uncharted Lands', by Romeo,‘Dramatic Motion', by Lars Bork Anderson,‘Ave Maria', by Ada Ragimov,‘The Creation of All Things', by Doug Kaufman, ‘Rhea', by Yehezkel Raz,And ‘Farewell', by Maya Belsitzman and Matan EphratContent warnings for this episode include: Gore, Impaled with Nails, Body Torn Apart, Suicide (Implied), Violence. Kidnapping and abduction, Death + Injury, Blood, Birds, Gun Mention, Strangulation/suffocation, Static (including sfx), Emotional Manipulation, Body horror, Electrocution, Religious Violence 

Send JD a text message and be heard!JAXSON DART A NYG & THEY DIDN'T TELL TOMMY CUTLETS THEY WERE DRAFTING HIM.  SHOCKING!!!!  @tommydevito how could you be shocked?   @ufl still has games left to play.  @jaxsondart can sit and learn the system for the @nygiants & @abdu1carter more like LT & less like @kayvonthibodeaux please. @nyjets went line and I am happy with that.  @armandmembou is a beast.  Protect the QB always.  @companyadjace @anthonyyacc love @tbook._ philosophy seeing the life go out of opponents eyes.   Football isn't for them anymore.  @thomaswdonovan @call_me_tca_prez @donna.fender @nyquil_inthe_flesh @packers pick a WR in the first round.  Ernie @aaronrodgers12 it's @jordan3love getting what he needs. @partylikearochkind & @dominic.etienne @texasfootball @matthew.d.golden 4.29 40 time is no joke. @paddy_bailey was drafted in first round by @seahawks my bad it's really @grey_zabel his doppelgänger.  @nyrangers @nyknicks #nbaplayoffs

Polly's trials begin, Vincent returns to the manor, and Riot suits up. The theme of tonight's episode is Embers.(To avoid spoilers, content warnings are listed at the end of this episode description).The bonus story that goes with this episode is ‘Scrap Meat', and is available for Hallowoods patrons on the show's Patreon, along with behind-the-scenes, exclusive merchandise, and more! Because the show runs without ads or sponsors, we rely on support from fans to guarantee the survival of this LGBTQ+ horror podcast.Hello From The Hallowoods is written and produced by William A. Wellman, a queer horror author. You can visit their website for more information! The transcript for this episode is available on the Hello From The Hallowoods Website. Click here to read!You can also find Hello From The Hallowoods on social media! The show is on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter at @thehallowoods. If you'd like to connect with other fans of the show, there's even a fan-run Discord Server!Music for this episode was used under license from Artlist.com. The soundtracks featured were: ‘Rhea', by Yehezkel Raz,‘Morning Sunbeams', by Yehezkel Raz,‘Infernos Laissez Vibrer', by Yehezkel Raz,‘The Sacred Union', by Shahead Mostafafar,‘Ascending Power', by Shahead Mostafafar, ‘King's Requiem', by Alon Peretz,‘A Moon Walk', by Yehezkel Raz,‘Lost Letters', by Borden Lulu,‘The Peruvian Protest', by Max H., ‘Charon', by Yehezkel Raz,‘For the Broken Hearted', by Yehezkel Raz,‘All is One', by The Places,‘Candle in the Dark', by Tommy H. Brandon,‘Charm', by ANBR,‘Titan', by Yehezkel Raz,‘Chasing Horizons', by Charlie Ryan,‘Effoliation', by SEA,‘A Lovely Day for a Walk', by John Gegelman,‘Rhea', by Yehezkel Raz,And ‘Farewell', by Maya Belsitzman and Matan EphratContent warnings for this episode include: Violence, Kidnapping and abduction, Death + Injury, Blood, Gun Mention, Static (including sfx), Body horror, Smoking, Religious Violence We're promoting the new religious body horror podcast Gospel of Haven for this month! Tune in wherever you're listening to this.https://podcasts.bloody-disgusting.com/podcasts/the-gospel-of-haven/

Jedediah evacuates the den, Valerie expresses her condolences, and Cole catches up. The theme of tonight's episode is Ashes.(To avoid spoilers, content warnings are listed at the end of this episode description).The bonus story that goes with this episode is ‘Emerald Dreams', and is available for Hallowoods patrons on the show's Patreon, along with behind-the-scenes, exclusive merchandise, and more! Because the show runs without ads or sponsors, we rely on support from fans to guarantee the survival of this LGBTQ+ horror podcast.Hello From The Hallowoods is written and produced by William A. Wellman, a queer horror author. You can visit their website for more information! The transcript for this episode is available on the Hello From The Hallowoods Website. Click here to read!You can also find Hello From The Hallowoods on social media! The show is on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter at @thehallowoods. If you'd like to connect with other fans of the show, there's even a fan-run Discord Server!Music for this episode was used under license from Artlist.com. The soundtracks featured were: ‘Rhea', by Yehzekel Raz,‘Morning Sunbeams', by Yehezkel Raz,‘Lost', by Lars Bork Andersen,‘Waiting', by Laurel Violet,‘Reminiscence', by Second Light,‘Dawn', by Eva Tiedemann,‘Uncharted Lands', by Romeo,‘A Moon Walk', by Yehezkel Raz,‘Shiver', by Pablo Suarez,‘Eureka Hills', by Eureka Woods,‘Forsaken', by Nsee,‘Lost Are We', by Alon Peretz,‘For the Broken Hearted', by Yehezkel Raz,‘A Touch of Dream', by Max H., ‘Quantum', by ANBR,‘Cello Concerto No 1', by Nick Keller,‘Titan', by Yehezkel Raz,‘Don't Look Back', by DaniHaDani,‘Tiding', by Yehezkel Raz,‘Violin Resonance', by Lumine Wave,‘Rhea', by Yehezkel Raz,And ‘Farewell', by Maya Belsitzman and Matan EphratContent warnings for this episode include: Child Abuse (beating), Violence, Kidnapping and abduction, Death + Injury, Blood, Transphobia, Homophobia, Gun Mention, Static (including sfx), Emotional Manipulation, Body horror, Religious Violence, Child Sacrifice (mention), PuppetsWe're promoting the new religious body horror podcast Gospel of Haven for this month! Tune in wherever you're listening to this.https://podcasts.bloody-disgusting.com/podcasts/the-gospel-of-haven/

Send us a textVenia is gone and the crew is running out of time! (roll credits) In a rush to follow they wrap up a few last minute things and we get our feelings hurt again.Luke Braun's Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/@CriticalMimik?si=VSCij5viSCRPugWZUrs Rex played by Steph of @EquinoxDiceVenia Venus played by Kayla of @acourtofkaylaElliana Zelerian “Eli” played by Hannah of @HannahmarieartworkTX-009 “Tex” and Phyll played by Scott of @the_gray_area_ Zolada “Zo” played by Lydia of @LydiakorynRenova played by Anna of @MistyMoutnainLegendsEveryone else played by Luke of @MistyMountainLegendsSupport the Podcast: https://ko-fi.com/mistymountainlegendsNew theme music by Tamuz Dekel. Other songs by Max H, Okaya and Lars Bork Anderson on ArtlistLogo by Red Queen HailsSupport the show

The word Leader often brings to mind the heroic image of a charismatic, confident, and persuasive person who seems to "know" what to do in an instinctual, gut-driven way.   In Decision Leadership: Empowering Others to Make Better Choices (Yale UP, 2022), Don A. Moore and Max H. Bazerman offer a well-researched and compelling corrective to this view.  They describe organizations as decision factories in which effective leaders are not lone heroes, but decision architects who design situations and policies that enable those around them to make wise, ethical choices that are consistent both with their own interests and the organization's values.  Built on a foundation of behavioral economics and decision science research, this book is full of real-life stories and concrete examples of the incentives, structures, and systems that can be used to guide negotiations and decision making. This approach avoids many of the common pit-falls of overconfidence and dependence on a few heroic figures, allowing strong leaders to have positive impact far beyond their limited individual range.   Authors recommended reading:  Negotiation: The Game Has Changed by Max H. Bazerman Perfectly Confident: How to Calibrate Your Decisions Wisely by Don A. Moore Also by these authors:  Judgment in Managerial Decision Making by Max H. Bazerman and Don A. Moore Hosted by Meghan Cochran Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/psychology

The word Leader often brings to mind the heroic image of a charismatic, confident, and persuasive person who seems to "know" what to do in an instinctual, gut-driven way.   In Decision Leadership: Empowering Others to Make Better Choices (Yale UP, 2022), Don A. Moore and Max H. Bazerman offer a well-researched and compelling corrective to this view.  They describe organizations as decision factories in which effective leaders are not lone heroes, but decision architects who design situations and policies that enable those around them to make wise, ethical choices that are consistent both with their own interests and the organization's values.  Built on a foundation of behavioral economics and decision science research, this book is full of real-life stories and concrete examples of the incentives, structures, and systems that can be used to guide negotiations and decision making. This approach avoids many of the common pit-falls of overconfidence and dependence on a few heroic figures, allowing strong leaders to have positive impact far beyond their limited individual range.   Authors recommended reading:  Negotiation: The Game Has Changed by Max H. Bazerman Perfectly Confident: How to Calibrate Your Decisions Wisely by Don A. Moore Also by these authors:  Judgment in Managerial Decision Making by Max H. Bazerman and Don A. Moore Hosted by Meghan Cochran Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

The word Leader often brings to mind the heroic image of a charismatic, confident, and persuasive person who seems to "know" what to do in an instinctual, gut-driven way.   In Decision Leadership: Empowering Others to Make Better Choices (Yale UP, 2022), Don A. Moore and Max H. Bazerman offer a well-researched and compelling corrective to this view.  They describe organizations as decision factories in which effective leaders are not lone heroes, but decision architects who design situations and policies that enable those around them to make wise, ethical choices that are consistent both with their own interests and the organization's values.  Built on a foundation of behavioral economics and decision science research, this book is full of real-life stories and concrete examples of the incentives, structures, and systems that can be used to guide negotiations and decision making. This approach avoids many of the common pit-falls of overconfidence and dependence on a few heroic figures, allowing strong leaders to have positive impact far beyond their limited individual range.   Authors recommended reading:  Negotiation: The Game Has Changed by Max H. Bazerman Perfectly Confident: How to Calibrate Your Decisions Wisely by Don A. Moore Also by these authors:  Judgment in Managerial Decision Making by Max H. Bazerman and Don A. Moore Hosted by Meghan Cochran Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/economics

The word Leader often brings to mind the heroic image of a charismatic, confident, and persuasive person who seems to "know" what to do in an instinctual, gut-driven way.   In Decision Leadership: Empowering Others to Make Better Choices (Yale UP, 2022), Don A. Moore and Max H. Bazerman offer a well-researched and compelling corrective to this view.  They describe organizations as decision factories in which effective leaders are not lone heroes, but decision architects who design situations and policies that enable those around them to make wise, ethical choices that are consistent both with their own interests and the organization's values.  Built on a foundation of behavioral economics and decision science research, this book is full of real-life stories and concrete examples of the incentives, structures, and systems that can be used to guide negotiations and decision making. This approach avoids many of the common pit-falls of overconfidence and dependence on a few heroic figures, allowing strong leaders to have positive impact far beyond their limited individual range.   Authors recommended reading:  Negotiation: The Game Has Changed by Max H. Bazerman Perfectly Confident: How to Calibrate Your Decisions Wisely by Don A. Moore Also by these authors:  Judgment in Managerial Decision Making by Max H. Bazerman and Don A. Moore Hosted by Meghan Cochran Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Ray reverses course, Riot starts a fire, and Percy explodes. The theme of tonight's episode is Ignitions.(To avoid spoilers, content warnings are listed at the end of this episode description).The bonus story that goes with this episode is ‘Court Order', and is available for Hallowoods patrons on the show's Patreon, along with behind-the-scenes, exclusive merchandise, and more! Because the show runs without ads or sponsors, we rely on support from fans to guarantee the survival of this LGBTQ+ horror podcast.Hello From The Hallowoods is written and produced by William A. Wellman, a queer horror author. You can visit their website for more information! The transcript for this episode is available on the Hello From The Hallowoods Website. Click here to read!You can also find Hello From The Hallowoods on social media! The show is on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter at @thehallowoods. If you'd like to connect with other fans of the show, there's even a fan-run Discord Server!Music for this episode was used under license from Artlist.com. The soundtracks featured were: ‘Rhea', by Yehezkel Raz, ‘Morning Sunbeams', by Yehezkel Raz,‘Aftershocks', by Ardie Son,‘Edge of Possibility', by Spearfisher,‘The Peruvian Protest', by Max H.,‘Whodunit', by Fableforte,‘A Moon Walk', by Yehezkel Raz,‘Orc', by Aviad Zinemanas,‘Towards the Light', by Ben Winwood,‘Am I Imagining', by Diamonds and Ice,‘For the Broken-hearted', by Yehezkel Raz,‘Quantum Edge', by Marco Martini,‘Hrim Hjarta', by Blackbard,‘The Sacred Union', by Shahead Mostafafar, ‘Titan', by Yehezkel Raz,‘Event Horizon', by Yehezkel Raz,‘Prophecy', by Matthias Forster,‘Violin Resonance', by Lumine Wave,‘Rhea', by Yehezkel Raz,And ‘Farewell', by Maya Belsitzman and Matan EphratContent warnings for this episode include: Deadnaming, Abuse, Animal death (Shank as usual), Violence, Kidnapping and abduction, Death + Injury, Blood, Transphobia, Homophobia, Birds, Gun Mention, Strangulation/suffocation, Misgendering, Static (including sfx), Emotional Manipulation, Bugs, Body horror

Endlich hat AMD die neue Generation der Radeon-Grafikkarten auf Basis von RDNA 4 vorgestellt! Also jetzt richtig, nachdem zur CES erst die Presse ihre Briefings erhielten, AMD aber einen Rückzieher machte. Nun ist es offiziell und es sieht besser aus als gedacht! Die Radeon RX 9070 XT soll für eine UVP von 599 US Dollar (Euro-Preise sind noch nicht bekannt) etwa die Performance einer Nvidia RTX 5070 Ti bieten. Die Nvidia-Grafikkarte hat dabei eine offizielle UVP von 750 US Dollar bzw. 879 Euro, im Handel jedoch teils deutlich über 1000 Euro. Die Raytracing-Performance soll weiterhin hinter Nvidia sein, auch wenn AMD hier deutliche Fortschritte gemacht will gegenüber RDNA 3. Spannend wird auch der neue Upscaler FSR 4, jetzt auch Machine Learning beschleunigt, erste Vergleichsbilder versprechen einen gewaltigen Sprung zu den früheren Versionen. Selbsbewusst zeigt sich AMD auch bei den Encoding-Fähigkeiten, hier will man vor allem bei H264 mit geringen Bitraten für Streaming nachgebessert haben. Es sieht also wirklich gut aus, mal sehen, was die Tests zeigen. Framework, bekannt für ihre modularen Laptops, die man nicht nur selbst zusammenstellen, sondern auch -bauen kann, aktualisiert einerseits den Laptop 13, den es jetzt auch mit Ryzen AI 300 gibt. Zum Anderen stellte der CEO auf einem Event mit dem Laptop 12 ein 2in1-Convertible mit Touchscreen und Stylus-Unterstützung für Schüler und Studenten vor. Der Hingucker war aber der Framework Desktop mit AMDs Workstation-APU Ryzen AI 300 Max: Ein Mini-PC für AI-Workloads v.a. die Arbeit mit größeren LLMs. Zum Abschluss beschäftigen wir uns mit einer Hörer-Frage: Kann man einen Steam-Account vererben? Wenn man Valve fragt, sei das ausgeschlossen, da man die Zugangsdaten der AGB entsprechend nicht weitergeben dürfe. Das steht aber wohl mit deutschem Erbrecht in Konflikt. Viel Spaß mit Folge 246! Sprecher: Michael Kister, Mohammed Ali DadAudioproduktion: Michael KisterVideoproduktion und Titelbild: Mohammed Ali DadBildquellen: AMDAufnahmedatum: 02.03.2025 Besucht unsim Discord https://discord.gg/SneNarVCBMauf Bluesky https://bsky.app/profile/technikquatsch.deauf Instagram https://www.instagram.com/technikquatschauf Youtube https://www.youtube.com/@technikquatsch(bald wieder) auf Twitch https://www.twitch.tv/technikquatsch RSS-Feed https://technikquatsch.de/feed/podcast/Spotify https://open.spotify.com/show/62ZVb7ZvmdtXqqNmnZLF5uApple Podcasts https://podcasts.apple.com/de/podcast/technikquatsch/id1510030975 00:00:00 Themen: AMD Radeon RX 9070 und 9070 XT vorgestellt; Framework aktualisiert Laptop 13, präsentiert 2in1-Convertible Laptop 12 und Desktop mit Ryzen AI 300 Max; Hörerfrage: Kann man einen Steam-Account vererben? Valve sagt nein, das beißt sich aber wohl mit deutschem Recht 00:02:45 AMD Radeon RX 9070 und 9070 XT: verfügbar ab 06. März für 599 und 549 USD https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GZfFPI8LJrchttps://www.computerbase.de/artikel/grafikkarten/amd-radeon-rx-9070-xt-launch.91565/Gamers Nexus: AMD RX 9070 & 9070 XT GPU Prices, Specs, & Release Date https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UAe50byQGG000:05:01 Kurzzusammenfassung der Situation mit Nvidia-Grafikkarten00:08:50 Performance-Angaben von AMD: RX 9070 XT etwa auf Höhe einer 5070 TI, Rasterizer gleich, RT darunter00:16:22 Specs00:22:02 Verbesserte Encoding-Qualität mit neuer Dual Media Engine00:24:58 FSR 4 bei 30 Spielen zum Start, später auch FSR 3.1 wohl per Treiber upgradebar 00:33:24 Framework 2nd Gen Event: Laptop 13 neu mit Ryzen AI 300 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-8k7jTF_JCg00:36:40 Laptop 12 2in1 Convertible00:42:05 Framework Desktop mit Ryzen AI Maxhttps://www.computerbase.de/news/pc-systeme/framework-desktop-firma-der-modularen-notebooks-ueberrascht-mit-amd-strix-halo.91559/ 00:48:54 Electronic Arts stellt Source Code von C&C-Teilen auf github https://github.com/electronicartshttps://www.computerbase.de/news/gaming/command-und-conquer-ea-macht-mehrere-c-und-c-klassiker-zu-open-so...

Shelby catches up with Shank, Hope goes to church, and Riot intervenes. The theme of tonight's episode is Forebodings.(To avoid spoilers, content warnings are listed at the end of this episode description).The bonus story that goes with this episode is ‘Midnight Hunt', and is available for Hallowoods patrons on the show's Patreon, along with behind-the-scenes, exclusive merchandise, and more! Because the show runs without ads or sponsors, we rely on support from fans to guarantee the survival of this LGBTQ+ horror podcast.Hello From The Hallowoods is written and produced by William A. Wellman, a queer horror author. You can visit their website for more information! The transcript for this episode is available on the Hello From The Hallowoods Website. Click here to read!You can also find Hello From The Hallowoods on social media! The show is on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter at @thehallowoods. If you'd like to connect with other fans of the show, there's even a fan-run Discord Server!Music for this episode was used under license from Artlist.com. The soundtracks featured were: ‘Rhea', by Yehezkel Raz,‘Morning Sunbeams', by Yehezkel Raz,‘Dawn', by Eva Tiedemann,‘Monster', by Quentin Coblentz, ‘Lost', by Lars Bork Anderson,‘From the Depths', by Jeremy Chontow,‘The Peruvian Protest', by Max H., ‘Candle in the Dark', by Tommy H. Brandon,‘Five Sense Prison', by Roie Shpigler, ‘A Moon Walk', by Yehezkel Raz, ‘Eureka Hills', by Eureka Woods,‘Touche', by Idokay,‘Waiting', by Laurel Violet,‘I Was All Alone', by Idokay,‘For the Broken Hearted', by Yehezkel Raz,‘Autumnal Smile', by Nocturne Samurai,‘Ave Maria', by Ada Ragimov,‘Effoliation', by Sea, ‘Shimmering Light', by Sparrow Tree,‘Towards the Light', by Ben Winwood,‘Titan', by Yehezkel Raz,‘Quantum', by ANBR,‘Days Pass', by ANBR,‘Rhea', by Yehezkel Raz,And ‘Farewell', by Maya Belsitzman and Matan EphratContent warnings for this episode include: Animal death (Shank as usual, Dreaming Box environmental effects), Violence, Kidnapping and abduction, Death + Injury, Blood, Needles, Birds, Frostbite, Strangulation/suffocation, Static (including sfx), Body horror

Cole honors a legacy, Buck chases a new mystery, and the Council is called. The theme of tonight's episode is Vengeances.(To avoid spoilers, content warnings are listed at the end of this episode description).The voice of Xyzikxyz, Emptiness Between Worlds is Charlene Bayer, who makes podcasts like Drinking and Screaming and Tabletop Tiddies. You can find them on social media at @charlenebayer, or as a professional DM for your roleplaying games at https://startplaying.games/gm/charlenebayer.The bonus story that goes with this episode is ‘Fifth String', and is available for Hallowoods patrons on the show's Patreon, along with behind-the-scenes, exclusive merchandise, and more! Because the show runs without ads or sponsors, we rely on support from fans to guarantee the survival of this LGBTQ+ horror podcast.Hello From The Hallowoods is written and produced by William A. Wellman, a queer horror author. You can visit their website for more information! The transcript for this episode is available on the Hello From The Hallowoods Website. Click here to read!You can also find Hello From The Hallowoods on social media! The show is on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter at @thehallowoods. If you'd like to connect with other fans of the show, there's even a fan-run Discord Server!Music for this episode was used under license from Artlist.com. The soundtracks featured were: ‘Rhea', by Yehezkel Raz,‘Morning Sunbeams', by Yehezkel Raz,‘Orc', by Aviad Zinemanas,‘The Peruvian Protest', by Max H., ‘Come Back Home', by Ardie Son,‘A Moon Walk', by Yehezkel Raz,‘Space Sauce', by Bunker Buster,‘Peace', by Roie Shpigler,‘For the Broken Hearted', by Yehezkel Raz,‘Journey' by Sid Acharya,‘Charm', by ANBR,‘Witches' Brew', by CK Martin,‘Titan', by Yehezkel Raz,‘Last Dream', by Daniel Brown Keys,‘Rhea', by Yehezkel Raz,And ‘Farewell', by Maya Belsitzman and Matan EphratContent warnings for this episode include: Violence, Animal cruelty or animal death (Shank as usual), Magical Ableism?, Death + Injury, Blood, Religious Violence, Character Death, Static (including sfx), Emotional Manipulation, Body horrorWe're highlighting the new horror fiction podcast Poe: Evermore! Find it wherever you're listening to this podcast. It's a show by Bloody Disgusting.

Stellenabbau, Kurzarbeit, Sparkurs: Die deutschen Autobauer und viele Zulieferer stecken in der Krise. 2023 fuhr die Branche noch Rekordgewinne ein, jetzt geht in vielen Unternehmen die Angst um. Vor allem E-Autos made in Germany laufen schlecht, die Konkurrenz aus China setzt den deutschen Herstellern zu. Wie kommt die erfolgsverwöhnte Autoindustrie wieder auf Erfolgskurs? Was kann die Politik tun und wo sind die Unternehmen gefordert? Würde es helfen, das Verbrenner-Aus in der EU zu verschieben? Geli Hensolt diskutiert mit Professor Christian Beidl - Leiter des Instituts für Verbrennungskraftmaschinen und Fahrzeugantriebe, Technische Universität Darmstadt, Thomas Puls - Senior Economist für Verkehr und Infrastruktur, IW Köln, Max Hägler - Verantwortlicher Redakteur für Industrie und Mobilität, Die Zeit

The Omen finds a way in, Diggory rolls the dice, and Cole takes the bait. The theme of tonight's episode is Vaults.(To avoid spoilers, content warnings are listed at the end of this episode description).The bonus story that goes with this episode is ‘A Taste of Sunlight', and is available for Hallowoods patrons on the show's Patreon, along with behind-the-scenes, exclusive merchandise, and more! Because the show runs without ads or sponsors, we rely on support from fans to guarantee the survival of this LGBTQ+ horror podcast.Hello From The Hallowoods is written and produced by William A. Wellman, a queer horror author. You can visit their website for more information! The transcript for this episode is available on the Hello From The Hallowoods Website. Click here to read!You can also find Hello From The Hallowoods on social media! The show is on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter at @thehallowoods. If you'd like to connect with other fans of the show, there's even a fan-run Discord Server!Music for this episode was used under license from Artlist.com. The soundtracks featured were: ‘Rhea', by Yehezkel Raz ‘Morning Sunbeams', by Yehezkel Raz‘Illustris Simulation', by Kyle Preston,‘Space Sauce', by Bunker Buster,‘All Is One', by The Places, ‘Goliath', by Ian Post,‘A Moonwalk', by Yehezkel Raz, ‘The Barrenness of a Busy Life', by Benja‘Just Say It', by Fire and Ice, ‘Touche', by Idokay,‘For the Broken Hearted', by Yehezkel Raz, ‘Peace', by Roie Shpigler, ‘A Lovely Day For A Walk', by Jon Gegelman, ‘Titan', by Yehezkel Raz, ‘The Peruvian Protest', by Max H, ‘Blackbard', by Hrim Hjarta, ‘Rhea', by Yehezkel Raz,And ‘Farewell', by Maya Belsitzman and Matan EphratContent warnings for this episode include: Animal death (bird souls), Violence, Kidnapping and abduction, Death + Injury, Blood, Gore, Strangulation/suffocation, Static (including sfx), Drowning, Bugs, Body horror, Alcohol Use, Religious Violence We're highlighting the new horror fiction podcast Poe: Evermore! Find it wherever you're listening to this podcast. It's a show by Bloody Disgusting.

Riot returns to work, Diggory clears up the past, and Shelby finds a clue. The theme of tonight's episode is Histories.(To avoid spoilers, content warnings are listed at the end of this episode description).The bonus story that goes with this episode is ‘File 31: Me', and is available for Hallowoods patrons on the show's Patreon, along with behind-the-scenes, exclusive merchandise, and more! Because the show runs without ads or sponsors, we rely on support from fans to guarantee the survival of this LGBTQ+ horror podcast.Hello From The Hallowoods is written and produced by William A. Wellman, a queer horror author. You can visit their website for more information! The transcript for this episode is available on the Hello From The Hallowoods Website. Click here to read!You can also find Hello From The Hallowoods on social media! The show is on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter at @thehallowoods. If you'd like to connect with other fans of the show, there's even a fan-run Discord Server!Music for this episode was used under license from Artlist.com. The soundtracks featured were: ‘Rhea', by Yehezkel Raz ‘Morning Sunbeams', by Yehezkel Raz‘The Barrenness of a Busy Life', by Benja‘Chasing Horizons', by Charlie Ryan‘A Moon Walk', by Yehezkel Raz, ‘Just Say It', by Diamonds and Ice, ‘Touche', by Idokay,‘A Lovely Day for a Walk', by John Gegelman, ‘For the Broken Hearted', by Yehezkel Raz, ‘Illustris Simulation', by Kyle Preston, ‘Goliath', by Ian Post, ‘Waiting', by Laurel Violet, ‘Peace', by Roie Shpigler, ‘The Peruvian Protest', by Max H, ‘Titan', by Yehezkel Raz, ‘Five Sense Prison', by Roie Shpigler, ‘Prophecy' by Mathias Forster, And ‘Farewell', by Maya Belsitzman and Matan EphratContent warnings for this episode include: Animal death (Shank, Beast the Bear as usual), Death + Injury, Blood, Static (including sfx), Emotional Manipulation, Bugs, Body horror, Brain Death/Coma

Heute ist Premierenzeit - Weltpremiere quasi! Denn Max Beatwerk war noch nie in einem Podcast zu Gast und ich habe die Ehre, das erste Podcast Interview mit ihm führen zu dürfen. Und die Ehre empfinde ich nicht nur wegen dieser Premiere, sondern auch deswegen, weil ich schon seit geraumer Zeit an Max herumbaggere und versuche ihn zu einem Talk zu überreden. Ich weiß nicht, ob du eines seiner Videos gesehen hast, aber wenn du nur ein bisschen was für Sound- und Soundexperimente übrig hast, ist das wie Geburtstag, Weihnachten, Ostern, Tag der Einheit und Namenstag zusammen: Einfach genial und soooooo inspirierend. Und daher stellte sich nicht die Frage, ob ich Max im Podcast haben will, sondern nur das wie... Und voila, mit etwas Hilfe haben wir es geschafft, ihn vors Mikrofon zu hieven. Und ich denke, es war nicht die schlechteste Idee, denn Max war sich danach sicher: Eine Fortsetzung wird folgen! Mehr zu Max findest du hier: https://maxbeatwerk.com/ Und Auf Instagram hier: https://www.instagram.com/maxbeatwerk/?hl=de Max Tipps: Oli Rubow: https://www.instagram.com/olirubow/?hl=de Brody Simpson: https://www.instagram.com/brodysimpsondrums/?hl=de Dan Mayo: https://www.instagram.com/mayodrummer/ Ian Maciak: https://www.instagram.com/ianhitsdrums/reels/ Gunnar Olsen: https://www.instagram.com/gunbuns/?hl=de Ich freu mich tierisch, wenn du auf der Seite von Einfach Schlagzeug mal unter https://einfachschlagzeug.de/ oder bei Instagram vorbeischaust: https://www.instagram.com/krafftfelix/?hl=de Kapitelmarken 0:00:09 - Start 0:02:24 - Los geht's 0:11:09 - Wer ist Max Beatwerk 0:38:16 - Endlich reinhören 0:44:52 - Vom Groove zum Song 1:08:20 - Max Hörtipps 1:12:32 - Schnellfragerunde 1:14:32 - Und Punkt

This is Stargate SG1 For the First Time! From the creators of Babylon 5 For the First Time, Jeff Akin is watching this iconic show for the first time while Brent Allen, who has seen it at least 47 times, is watching for the first time for those sci-fi messages that hold a mirror up to society or show us how to be better human beings.The Tok'ra Parts 1 and 2 - Season 2, Episodes 11 and 12Visit https://www.babylon5first.com/ for more!This show is produced in association with the Akin Collective, Mulberry Entertainment, and Framed Games. Find out how you can support the show and get great bonus content like access to notes, a Discord server, unedited reaction videos, and more: https://www.patreon.com/babylon5firstSpecial Thanks to all who support our show through Patreon, including: Executive Producers:Todd K, Terrafan, Kat, Todd J., Colin B, Jeffrey H., jal'Zha, Andrew, The Space Pope, Trekkie Trey the Trekker, Andrew B, Fabio K, Matt Ion, Snatcher42, DAG, Mr. Krosis, Rob B, ClupPro70, Commodore Trev, Peter S, Ron H, Mattie G, Stuart H, Martin S., Becky S, Timo H, Acesoldia, Starfury 5470, James H, Chris L, Ian M, NJRetiredLEO, Paul H, Suzanne E, Demi-DW, FellKnight, Calinicus, Neil M., Gregory C, Anthony P., Thomas M, James O, Frankie, Linnaeus, Kenny K, Max H, Joel T, Jack Kitchen, fcast17, Katerina K, Joey P, Duane B.Producers:Adam P.David B.Guy K.John K.framedKatFollow us on Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/BabylonFirstVisit https://www.patreon.com/byenerds to join the Patreon for full, unedited videos and an incredible community.Support the Show.

Two veteran Star Trek podcasters watch Babylon 5 for the first time. Brent Allen and Jeff Akin search for Star Trek like messages in this series, deciding if they should have watched it sooner.This is it! The end of the road for Babylon 5. At least for now. Jeff and Brent try to decide if the best way to describe perfection is "Sleeping in Light." This show is produced in association with the Akin Collective, Mulberry Entertainment, and Framed Games. Find out how you can support the show and get great bonus content like access to notes, a Discord server, unedited reaction videos, and more: https://www.patreon.com/babylon5firstSpecial Thanks to all who support our show through Patreon, including:Executive Producers:Todd K, Terrafan, Kat, Todd J., Colin B, Jeffrey H., jal'Zha, Andrew, The Space Pope, Trekkie Trey the Trekker, Andrew B, Fabio K, Matt Ion, Snatcher42, DAG, Mr. Krosis, Rob B, ClupPro70, Commodore Trev, Peter S, Ron H, Mattie G, Stuart H, Martin S., Becky S, Timo H, Acesoldia, Starfury 5470, James H, Chris L, Ian M, NJRetiredLEO, Paul H, Suzanne E, Demi-DW, FellKnight, Calinicus, Neil M., Gregory C, Anthony P., Thomas M, James O, Frankie, Linnaeus, Kenny K, Max H, Joel T, Jack Kitchen, fcast17, Katerina K, Joey P, Duane B.Producers:Adam P.David B.Guy K.John K.framedKatFollow us on Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/BabylonFirstWebsite: https://www.babylon5first.com/All rights belong to the Prime Time Entertainment Network, WBTV, and TNT. No copyright infringement intended.Copyright Disclaimer, Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for 'fair use' for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.Visit https://www.patreon.com/babylon5first to join the Babylon 5 For the First Time Patreon. Support the Show.

This is Stargate SG1 For the First Time! From the creators of Babylon 5 For the First Time, Jeff Akin is watching this iconic show for the first time while Brent Allen, who has seen it at least 47 times, is watching for the first time for those sci-fi messages that hold a mirror up to society or show us how to be better human beings.Bane - Season 2, Episode 10Visit https://www.babylon5first.com/ for more!This show is produced in association with the Akin Collective, Mulberry Entertainment, and Framed Games. Find out how you can support the show and get great bonus content like access to notes, a Discord server, unedited reaction videos, and more: https://www.patreon.com/babylon5firstSpecial Thanks to all who support our show through Patreon, including: Executive Producers:Todd K, Terrafan, Kat, Todd J., Colin B, Jeffrey H., jal'Zha, Andrew, The Space Pope, Trekkie Trey the Trekker, Andrew B, Fabio K, Matt Ion, Snatcher42, DAG, Mr. Krosis, Rob B, ClupPro70, Commodore Trev, Peter S, Ron H, Mattie G, Stuart H, Martin S., Becky S, Timo H, Acesoldia, Starfury 5470, James H, Chris L, Ian M, NJRetiredLEO, Paul H, Suzanne E, Demi-DW, FellKnight, Calinicus, Neil M., Gregory C, Anthony P., Thomas M, James O, Frankie, Linnaeus, Kenny K, Max H, Joel T, Jack Kitchen, fcast17, Katerina K, Joey P, Duane B.Producers:Adam P.David B.Guy K.John K.framedKatFollow us on Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/BabylonFirstVisit https://www.patreon.com/byenerds to join the Patreon for full, unedited videos and an incredible community.Support the Show.

In der Reisebranche ist in den letzten Wochen viel passiert und in der Kakophonie von Meinungen, Spekulationen und Gehässigkeiten haben Sven und Andy beschlossen einfach mal den Mund zu halten. Um so mehr zu sagen hat dafür Max Hübner, ein Touristiker der viele Hüte trägt. Dozent, Berater und Freizeit-Punk nennt er sich und in der neuen Folge von HIN & WEG: der Reisepodcast mit Sven Meyer und Andy Janz hat er tatsächlich viel zu erzählen. Warum die Reisebranche sich nach außen so schlecht darstellt, was es tatsächlich mit dem Fachkräfte- und Nachwuchsmangel in der Branche auf sich hat und warum man sich auf den Tourismusausschuss im Bundestag tatsächlich gut vorbereiten sollte. Außerdem verrät er ein bisschen etwas über seine neueste Gründung und seine (vielleicht) politischen Ambitionen. Sehr interessant! Unbedingt hören! Jetzt online.

Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: Bayesian updating in real life is mostly about understanding your hypotheses, published by Max H on January 1, 2024 on LessWrong. My sense is that an increasingly common viewpoint around here is that the last ~20 years of AI development and AI x-risk discourse are well-described by the following narrative: Eliezer Yudkowsky (and various others who were at least initially heavily influenced by his ideas) developed detailed models of key issues likely to be inherent in the process of developing smarter-than-human AI. These models were somewhere between "maybe plausible" and "quite compelling" at the time that they were put forth, but recent developments in AI (e.g. behavioral characteristics of language models, smoothness / gradualness of scaling) have shown that reality just isn't panning out in quite the way Eliezer's models predicted. These developments haven't entirely falsified Eliezer's models and key predictions, but there are now plenty of alternative models and theories. Some or all of these competing models either are or claim to: have a better recent track record of predicting near-term AI developments better retrodict past developments[1] be backed by empirical results in machine learning and / or neuroscience feel more intuitively plausible and evidence-backed to people with different backgrounds and areas of expertise Therefore, even if we can't entirely discount Eliezer's models, there's clearly a directional Bayesian update which any good Bayesian (including Eliezer himself) should be able to make by observing recent developments and considering alternate theories which they support. Even if the precise degree of the overall update (and the final landing place of the posterior) remains highly uncertain and debatable, the basic direction is clear. Without getting into the object-level too much, or even whether the narrative as a whole reflects the actual views of particular real people, I want to make some remarks on the concept of belief updating as typically used in narratives like this. Note, there's a sense in which any (valid) change in one's beliefs can be modeled as a Bayesian update of some kind, but here I am specifically referring to the popular rationalist practice of thinking and communicating explicitly in terms of the language of probabilities and likelihood ratios. There are some questionable assumptions embedded in (what I suspect are) common views of (a) how the updating process is supposed to work in general and (b) how to apply the process validly to the particular case of updating one's models of AI development and x-risk. When such views are expressed implicitly in the context of a sentiment that "updating" is broadly virtuous / desirable / correct, I find that there tends to be a lot of gloss over important caveats and prerequisites that keep the underlying mental motion tethered to reality - that is, ensure it remains a systematic (if rough and approximate) method for valid reasoning under uncertainty. The rest of this post is a review of some of the key concepts and requirements for Bayesian updating to work as intended, with some examples and non-examples of how these requirements can fail to be met in practice. My conclusion is not that the practice of explicit Bayesian updating is inherently flawed, but that it must be applied with attention to the preconditions and assumptions firmly in mind at all times. Local validity at each step must be tracked strictly and adhered to closely enough to ensure that the process as a whole actually holds together as a method for systematically minimizing expected predictive error. Further, I think that most of the utility of explicit reasoning and communication in Bayesian terms derives not from the end result (whether that end result is a precise numerical posterior probability or just a rou...

Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: Concrete positive visions for a future without AGI, published by Max H on November 9, 2023 on LessWrong. "There was a threshold crossed somewhere," said the Confessor, "without a single apocalypse to mark it. Fewer wars. Less starvation. Better technology. The economy kept growing. People had more resource to spare for charity, and the altruists had fewer and fewer causes to choose from. They came even to me, in my time, and rescued me. Earth cleaned itself up, and whenever something threatened to go drastically wrong again, the whole attention of the planet turned in that direction and took care of it. Eliezer Yudkowsky, Three Worlds Collide A common sentiment among people worried about AI x-risk is that our world is on track to stagnate, collapse, or otherwise come to a bad end without (aligned) AGI to save the day. Scott Alexander: [I]f we never get AI, I expect the future to be short and grim. Most likely we kill ourselves with synthetic biology. If not, some combination of technological and economic stagnation, rising totalitarianism + illiberalism + mobocracy, fertility collapse and dysgenics will impoverish the world and accelerate its decaying institutional quality. @disturbance in a a recent LW post that got lots of comments: Statement: I want to deliberately balance the caution and the recklessness in developing AGI, such that it gets created in the last possible moment so that I and my close ones do not die. A seemingly straightforward implication of this view is that we should therefore be willing to take on some amount of risk in order to build towards AGI faster than we would in a world where we had the luxury to take our time. I think some of these sentiments and their implications are based on a mistaken view of the relative difficulty of particular technical and social challenges, but here I want to focus on a totally different point: there are lots of ways that things could go well without AGI (at least for a while). Even if positive scenarios without AGI are unlikely or unrealistic given our current circumstances and trajectory, it's useful to have a concrete vision of what a good medium-term future without AGI could look like. I think it's especially important to take a moment to reflect on these possible good futures because recent preliminary governance wins, even if they succeed without qualification, are mainly focused on restriction and avoidance of bad outcomes rather than on building towards particular positive outcomes. The rest of this post is a collection of examples of technologies, ideas, projects, and trends unrelated to AGI that give me hope and joy when I see them being worked on or talked about. It's not meant to be exhaustive in any sense - mostly it is just a list of areas that I personally enjoy reading about, and would consider professional opportunities related to them. Most of them involve solving hard technological and social problems. Some are quite speculative, and likely to be intractable or extremely unlikely to come to pass in isolation. But making incremental progress on any one is probably robustly positive for the world and lucrative and fulfilling for the people working on them[1]. And progress tends to snowball, as long as there's no catastrophe to stop it. As you read through the list, try to set aside your own views and probabilities on AGI, other x-risks, and fizzle or stagnation scenarios. Imagine a world where it is simply a given that humanity has time and space to flourish unimpeded for a time. Visualize what such a world might look like, where solutions are permitted to snowball without the threat of everything being cut short or falling to pieces. The purpose of this post is not to argue that any such world is particularly likely to be actualized; it is intended to serve as a concrete reminder that there a...

Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: Actually, "personal attacks after object-level arguments" is a pretty good rule of epistemic conduct, published by Max H on September 18, 2023 on LessWrong. Background: this post is a response to a recent post by @Zack_M_Davis, which is itself a response to a comment on another post. I intentionally wrote this post in a way that tries to decontextualize it somewhat from the original comment and its author, but without being at least a bit familiar with all of the context, it's probably not very intelligible or interesting. This post started as a comment on Zack's post, but I am spinning it out into own post because I think it has broader applicability and because I am interested in hearing thoughts and responses from the readers and upvoters of that post, moreso than from its author. I originally responded to Zack's post with a comment here, but on further reflection, I want to strengthen and clarify some claims I alluded to in that comment. I see Zack's post as making two main claims. I have medium confidence that both of the claims are false, and high confidence that they are not well-supported by the text in the post. Claim one (paraphrased): "personal attacks (alt. negative character assessments) should only come after making object-level arguments" isn't actually a {good,useful,true} rule of epistemic conduct. I see the primary justifications given for this claim in the text as (paraphrased): The person claiming this is a rule should be able to explain why they think such a rule would systematically lead to more accurate beliefs ("maps that reflect the territory"). In fact, no such valid explanation is likely to exist, because following such a rule would not systematically lead to the formation of more accurate beliefs. The issue with the first justification is that no one has actually claimed that the existence of such a rule is obvious or self-evident. Publicly holding a non-obvious belief does not obligate the holder to publicly justify that belief to the satisfaction of the author. Perhaps a more charitable interpretation of the author's words ("I think [the claimant]... should be able to explain why such a rule systematically produces maps that reflect the territory...") is that the absence of a satisfactory explanation from the claimant is Bayesian evidence that no such explanation exists. But if that's what the author actually meant, then they should have said so more plainly, and acknowledged that this is often pretty weak evidence. (Relevant background context: Zack has previously argued at great length that this particular claimant's failure to adequately respond publicly about another matter is Bayesian evidence about a variety of important inferences related to that claimant's epistemics.) The issue with the second justification is that a valid explanation for why this is a good rule very likely does exist; I gave one that I find plausible at the end of my first comment: If more people read the beginning of an argument than the end, putting the personal attacks at the beginning will predictably lead to more people seeing the attacks than the arguments that support them. Even if such readers are not consciously convinced by attacks without argument, it seems implausible that their beliefs or impressions will not be moved at all. Another possible explanation (for which the source of inspiration Raemon gives in the comments): one interpretation of the proposed rule is that it is essentially just a restatement of avoiding the logical fallacy of Bulverism; if that interpretation is accepted, what remains to be shown is that avoiding Bulverism in particular, or even avoiding logical fallacies in general, is likely to lead to more accurate beliefs in both readers and authors, independent of the truth values of the specific claims being made. This seems plau...

After picking up a hitchhiker on a remote desert highway, a man's life begins to unravel. Music by Max H and Yehezkel Raz  For access to my audiobook, go to patreon.com/acephale Merch: acephalehorrorfiction.com/store Instagram: @acephalehorrorfiction Twitter: @jeffwalkersdead Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In this episode, the Editor-in-Chief of the German Platypus Review, Tobias Rochlitz, sits down with Platypus members Stefan H, Jan BH, and our co-host Lisa M, all of whom contributed to the content of the special PR issue on Gender, to discuss an reflect upon the interview with Koschka Linkerhand, Tove Soiland and the panel discussion 'Gender and the Left‘ with Platypus member Stefan H, Roswitha Scholz and Sara Rukaj. They talk about how the ideas of the New Left survived and continued in the Millennial Left generation, the Heideggerian aspect of Lacan and about the Millennial Left's focus on so-called “Materialism”. German-language Platypus Review #23: https://platypus1917.org/wp-content/uploads/ausgabe_23.pdf Interview with Koschka Linkerhand: https://platypus1917.org/2023/01/19/interview_linkerhand/ Interview with Tove Soiland: https://platypus1917.org/2023/01/19/interview_soiland/ Panel: Gender and the Left with Roswitha Scholz, Sara Rukaj and Stefan Hain: https://platypus1917.org/2023/07/01/gender-and-the-left/ [German: https://platypus1917.org/2023/01/19/gender_podium/ ] References: Gary Mucciaroni, Sherry Wolf, Kenyon Farrow, and Greg Gabrellas (2010): Which way forward for sexual liberation? https://platypus1917.org/2011/02/01/which-way-forward-for-sexual-liberation/ Roxanne Baker, Judith Shapiro, and Sarah McDonald (2018): Marxism and feminism https://platypus1917.org/2018/05/04/marxism-and-feminism/ Cornelia Möser, Lucy Parker, Ursula Jensen, and Joy McReady (2015): Women: the Longest Revolution https://platypus1917.org/2016/03/07/women-longest-revolution-frankfurt/ David Faes (2018): Transgender liberation? A movement whose time has passed https://platypus1917.org/2018/11/02/transgender-liberation-a-movement-whose-time-has-passed/ Stefan Hain and Andreas Wintersperger (2021): Psychoanalysis and Marxism https://platypus1917.org/2022/07/03/psychoanalysis-and-marxism/ Max Horkheimer (1926–31): “The Little Man and the Philosophy of Freedom,” in Dämmerung https://platypus1917.org/wp-content/uploads/readings/horkheimer_dawnex.pdf Original soundtracks by Tamas Vilaghy Editing work by Michael Woodson Design by Max Hörügel

Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: Forum Karma: view stats and find highly-rated comments for any LW user, published by Max H on July 1, 2023 on LessWrong. I've been posting and commenting pretty frequently over the last few months, and I was curious about some stats. What started as a few GraphQL queries and some Python scripting turned into an interactive web app: Enter a username, and it will give you some stats and a graph, broken down by post and comment karma. You can use the slider to adjust the date range, and the stats are automatically recalculated for the selected time period. Another feature is the list of "Gems" - comments with at least a few votes that have the highest net karma score, i.e. comments that received strong upvotes from high-karma users, and few downvotes. I found that this often gives a better sense of a user's best comments than just looking at the highest-scoring ones. It can be useful for finding your own historical top comments, or to get a sense for the best contributions of other users, which are often buried in their comment history and hard to access directly. Interesting example users: Me! It works for the EA forum too, though you have to specify a full profile URL to disambiguate: ://forum.effectivealtruism.org/users/lizka ://forum.effectivealtruism.org/users/holdenkarnofsky Limitations and caveats: The app works by querying the LW GraphQL API. It makes a couple of GraphQL queries to fetch data for up to 5000 comments and 5000 posts all at once. I only fetch the minimal fields needed to calculate the stats, not the actual contents of the posts or comments. (For top comments links and preview, the comment data is fetched individually as needed, on hover). I think this shouldn't place too much stress on the LW backend, but I can take it down if the developers or mods find it to be problematic. Data and stats for users with more than 5000 comments will be incomplete. I tried for a while to find a GraphQL query that supports fetching old comments for users with lots of comments, but couldn't find one (offset doesn't work; the API returns an error for too-big offsets.) If any LW devs (or anyone else) finds a GraphQL query that allows fetching old comments for users with >5000 comments, I can fix this. GreaterWrong somehow accomplishes this to implement sort by top or old, but they appear to be doing it on the backend, so I couldn't reverse engineer it. The comment previewer is pretty basic, since I'm just dumping the raw HTML from LW into a tooltip with minimal formatting. I might improve this at some point. Stats for old users will be somewhat inaccurate - I assumed for the purposes of removing the user's self-vote (which doesn't count towards their karma) that everyone always strong upvotes their own posts and weak upvotes their own comments, and that strong / weak upvotes are worth the amounts described here. This will be slightly inaccurate for contributions from before strong voting was introduced, and more inaccurate for contributions from before self-voting was introduced. I was mainly interested in stats for more recent content, but if anyone has a handy schedule of when all the voting rules were implemented / changed, I can probably make it more accurate pretty easily. Karma is counted as if it were all received at the time the post or comment was first posted. In my experience, the vast majority of votes on something happen relatively soon after it is posted - people tend not to vote on old stuff too much. So this introduces only a small inaccuracy. Aside: this was the first nontrivial greenfield project that I've developed since GPT-4 was released. I used some technologies I was less familiar with (GraphQL, Chart.js, Tailwind CSS), and had GPT-4 write as much of the code as possible. I've been using GitHub Copilot for day-to-day programming for a while, but ...

Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: 10 quick takes about AGI, published by Max H on June 20, 2023 on LessWrong. I have a bunch of loosely related and not fully fleshed out ideas for future posts. In the spirit of 10 reasons why lists of 10 reasons might be a winning strategy, I've written some of them up as a list of facts / claims / predictions / takes. (Some of the explanations aren't exactly "quick", but you can just read the bold and move on if you find it uninteresting or unsurprising.) If there's interest, I might turn some of them into their own posts or expand on them in the comments here. Computational complexity theory does not say anything practical about the bounds on AI (or human) capabilities. Results from computational complexity theory are mainly facts about the limiting behavior of deterministic, fully general solutions to parameterized problems. For example, if a problem is NP-hard (and P≠NP), that implies that there is no deterministic algorithm anyone (even a superintelligence) can run, which accepts arbitrary instances of the problem and finds a solution in time steps polynomial in the size of the problem. But that doesn't mean that any particular, non-parameterized instance of the problem cannot be solved some other way, e.g. by exploiting a regularity in the particular instance, using a heuristic or approximation or probabilistic solution, or that a human or AI can find a way of sidestepping the need to solve the problem entirely.Claims like "ideal utility maximisation is computationally intractable" or "If just one step in this plan is incomputable, the whole plan is as well." are thus somewhat misleading, or at least missing a step in their reasoning about why such claims are relevant as a bound on human or AI capabilities. My own suspicion is that when one attempts to repair these claims by making them more precise, it becomes clear that results from computational complexity theory are mostly irrelevant. From here on, capabilities research won't fizzle out (no more AI winters). I predict that the main bottleneck on AI capabilities progress going forward will be researcher time to think up, design, implement, and run experiments. In the recent past, the compute and raw scale of AI systems was simply too little for many potential algorithmic innovations to work at all. Now that we're past that point, some non-zero fraction of new ideas that smart researchers think up and spend the time to test will "just work" at least somewhat, and these ideas will compound with other improvements in algorithms and scale. It's not quite recursive or self improvement yet, but we've reached some kind of criticality threshold on progress which is likely to make things get weird, faster than expected. My own prediction for what one aspect of this might look like is here. Scaling laws and their implications, e.g. Chinchilla, are facts about particular architectures and training algorithms. As a perhaps non-obvious implication, I predict that future AI capabilities research progress will not be limited much by the availability of compute and / or training data. A few frames from a webcam may or may not be enough for a superintelligence to deduce general relativity, but the entire corpus of the current internet is almost certainly more than enough to train a below-human-level AI up to superhuman levels, even if the AI has to start with algorithms designed entirely by human capabilities researchers. (The fact that much of the training data was generated by humans is not relevant as a capabilities bound of systems trained on that data.) "Human-level" intelligence is actually a pretty wide spectrum. Somewhat contra the classic diagram, I think that intelligence in humans spans a pretty wide range, even in absolute terms. Here, I'm using a meaning of intelligence which is roughly, the ability to re-arrang...

Week 2 of Link Up's Series 5 keeps us in Quebec with Lachute haze masters Sir John! Co-Founders Joel and Max join Tiff and Cee to discuss their changing demographic and why they get so many people in from Montreal, how they work with the city to promote the region to groups who may not be aware of it, their taproom mission to create a diverse and welcoming environment, and their various community beers and sponsorships. Sir John dropped a juicy haze bomb for Link Up, a 6.4% NEIPA with Citra, Riwaka, Sabro and Idaho 7 that boasts mango, pineapple and dank vibes. Cheers!   About the Link Up season: We're back with a brand new season of BAOS Podcast, and this one is something very special and very close to us. We'll be focusing this entire season on Link Up, a non-profit started by the good folks behind Microbrasserie 5e Baron in Aylmer, QC and Tiffany and Cee here at BAOS and High Season Co. Our aim with this program is to help BIPOC from underrepresented communities learn about and enter the craft beer industry in essentially any area they wish - from a brewing apprentice to taking the Cicerone course for front-of-house opportunities, from hop farming to the yeast lab, from beer media to design and photography, we're here to help diversify an industry that is in dire need of it. Link Up Apply for the program via their website | Instagram | Twitter | Facebook BAOS Podcast Subscribe to the podcast on YouTube | Website | Theme tune: Cee - BrewHeads

Thanks everyone for joining us this season! We have really enjoyed speaking with our incredible guests who taught us about solidarity from so many angles. This is our penultimate episode, and we are super excited to spend it with our season 4 co-host, Darien Alexander Williams! Since he was last on the podcast, Darien completed his doctorate and is an incoming Assistant Prof. at Boston University. As many of you know, he is an urban planner who studies Blackness, Islam and disaster. Being an active part of community in Boston is a priority for him, and we are so glad he joined us to discuss the complicated space of scholar activism. Thanks for listening!    Follow us on Twitter, Instagram and Facebook @DisastersDecon Rate and Review on Apple Podcasts Subscribe wherever you get your podcasts!    Further information: Queer Muslims of Boston   Our guests: Darien Alexander Williams (@nigreaux)   Music this week from "chimera soldiers" by Max H. 

Im Prozess um manipulierte Abgaswerte bei Dieselautos hat der frühere Audi-Chef Rupert Stadler als erstes Mitglied des VW-Konzernvorstands ein Geständnis abgelegt. Stadler gab zu, von der Manipulation der Abgaswerte gewusst, aber nicht eingegriffen zu haben. Max Hägler, Wirtschaftsredakteur der ZEIT, erklärt, warum Stadler nach jahrelangem Beteuern seiner Unschuld doch noch gestanden hat. 2019 erbeuteten Diebe Schmuck und Juwelen aus dem Grünen Gewölbe in Dresden. Jetzt wurden fünf der sechs Angeklagten zu mehrjährigen Haft- oder Jugendstrafen verurteilt. Anfang des Jahres hatten vier der Angeklagten ihre Beteiligung an der Tat gestanden und einen Teil der Beute zurückgegeben. Dafür wurden ihnen mildere Strafen versprochen. Angela Merkel ist mit dem Staatspreis des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen ausgezeichnet worden. Die höchste Auszeichnung des Landes erhält die ehemalige Bundeskanzlerin für ihren Einsatz zum Wohl des deutschen Volks, ihren Beitrag zur Stabilität der Europäischen Union und ihre außergewöhnlichen humanitären Leistungen. Was noch? In Europa sterben die Vögel. Moderation und Produktion: Lisa Caspari Redaktion: Constanze Kainz Mitarbeit: Paulina Kraft Fragen, Kritik, Anregungen? Sie erreichen uns unter wasjetzt@zeit.de. Weitere Links zur Folge: - Rupert Stadler: Das kürzeste Geständnis im Dieselskandal (https://www.zeit.de/mobilitaet/2023-05/rupert-stadler-diesel-prozess-gestaendnis) - Grünes Gewölbe: Gericht verhängt mehrjährige Haftstrafen für Juwelendiebstahl (https://www.zeit.de/kultur/2023-05/juwelenraub-im-gruenen-gewoelbe-taeter-muessen-mehrere-jahre-in-haft) - Grünes Gewölbe: News und Infos (https://www.zeit.de/thema/gruenes-gewoelbe)

Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: Reward is the optimization target (of capabilities researchers), published by Max H on May 15, 2023 on The AI Alignment Forum. In Reward is not the optimization target, @TurnTrout writes: Therefore, reward is not the optimization target in two senses: Deep reinforcement learning agents will not come to intrinsically and primarily value their reward signal; reward is not the trained agent's optimization target. Utility functions express the relative goodness of outcomes. Reward is not best understood as being a kind of utility function. Reward has the mechanistic effect of chiseling cognition into the agent's network. Therefore, properly understood, reward does not express relative goodness and is therefore not an optimization target at all. I think these claims are true and important, though in my own terms, I would rephrase and narrow as: Executing a policy trained through current reinforcement learning methods does not necessarily result in a system which takes actions to maximize the reward function. I find the claim stated this way more intuitively obvious, but also somewhat less interesting, because the restatement makes the narrowness more explicit. In this post, I want to highlight a fact which I did not see mentioned in the original post or the comments: in the field of reinforcement learning, there are agents which are pursuing the goal of building a system which maximizes a reward function, subject to some additional constraints. These agents are the capabilities researchers designing and implementing SotA reinforcement learning algorithms and other methods to build and test the most capable, general systems across a variety of domains. Capabilities researchers are not solely concerned with maximizing a particular reward function, since it is not very difficult or interesting to program a bot the old-fashioned way to beat a particular Atari game. For other games (e.g. Go) it is harder to beat human or machine performance by using traditional programming techniques, and trying doesn't make for a compelling AI research agenda. Aside from the headline metric of how well a new RL method does in terms of training policies which result in a high reward when executed, RL researchers place importance on: Efficiency, in many senses: How much computing power does it take to train a policy to perform well in a particular domain? How much (and what kind of) training data does it take to train a policy? How much computing power and space (i.e. size of the model) does it take to execute the policy? Generality of methods across domains: for example, can the same RL training process, applied to the same network architecture but with different training data, be applied to train policies and create systems which play many different types of games well? Dreamer is an example of a very general and powerful RL method. Generality of the trained system across domains: can a single system be trained to perform well in a variety of different domains, without retraining? Gato and LLMs are examples of this kind of generality. Why is this observation important? In my view, current RL methods have not yet advanced to the point of creating systems which can be indisputably described as agents which has any kind of values at all. I view most attempts to draw parallels between high-level processes that happen in current-day AI systems and human brains as looking for patterns which do not yet exist. Speculating on what kind of agents and values current DL-paradigm RL methods might produce in the future can be valuable and important research, but I think that it is important to remain grounded about what current systems are actually doing, and to be precise with terms. As an example of where I think a lack of grounding about current systems and methods leads to things going wrong, in Evolut...

Is Africa in your future? It can be, and for less money than you think. Also, some thoughts on aging as Michael heads toward his 73rd birthday. MichaelBane.TV - On the Radio episode # 168. Scroll down for reference links on topics discussed in this episode. Disclaimer: The statements and opinions expressed here are our own and may not represent those of the companies we represent or any entities affiliated to it. Host: Michael Bane Producer: Flying Dragon Ltd. More information and reference links: Skinner Sights Andy Larsson Facebook Page Evelyn Game Ranch Training Your Mind/Michael Bane, MEN'S FITNESS Michael Bane on Extreme Sports An Interview with Michael Bane/American Warrior Show Burris FastFire 4 Leupold Custom Shop Closed The Music of Anthony Vega The Music of Max H.

Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: A decade of lurking, a month of posting, published by Max H on April 9, 2023 on LessWrong. This post is a look back on my first month or so as an active contributor on LessWrong, after lurking for over a decade. My experience so far has been overwhelmingly positive, and one purpose of this post is to encourage other lurkers to do the same. The reason I decided to start posting, in a nutshell: For the last 10 years or so, I've been following Eliezer's public writing and nodding along in silent agreement with just about everything he says. I mostly didn't feel like I had much to contribute to the discussion, at least not enough to overcome the activation energy required to post, which for me seems to be pretty high. However, over the last few years and especially the last few months, I've grown increasingly alarmed and disappointed by the number of highly-upvoted and well-received posts on AI, alignment, and the nature of intelligent systems, which seem fundamentally confused about certain things. I think (what I perceive as) these misunderstandings and confusion are especially prominent in posts which reject all or part of the Yudkowskian view of intelligence and alignment. I notice Eliezer's own views seem to be on the outs with some fraction of prominent posters these days. One hypothesis for this is that Eliezer is actually wrong about a lot of things, and that people are right to treat his ideas with skepticism. Reading posts and comments from both Eliezer and his skeptics though, I find this hypothesis unconvincing. Eliezer may sometimes be wrong about important things, but his critics don't seem to be making a very strong case.(I realize the paragraphs above are potentially controversial. My intent is not to be inflammatory or to attack anyone. My goal in this post is simply to be direct about my own beliefs, without getting too much into the weeds about why I hold them.) My first few posts and comments have been an attempt to articulate my own understanding of some concepts in AI and alignment which I perceive as widely misunderstood. My goal is to build a foundation from which to poke and prod at some of the Eliezer-skeptical ideas, to see if I have a knack for explaining where others have failed. Or, alternatively, to see if I am the one missing something fundamental, which becomes apparent through more active engagement. Overview of my recent posts This section is an overview of my posts so far, ranked by which ones I think are the most worth reading. Most of my posts assume some background familiarity, if not agreement with, Yudkowskian ideas about AI and alignment. This makes them less accessible as "101 explanations", but allows me to wade a bit deeper into the weeds without getting bogged down in long introductions. Steering systems My longest and most recent post, and the one that I am most proud of. As of publishing this piece, it has gotten a handful of strong and weak upvotes, and zero downvotes. I'm not sure if this indicates it dropped off the front page before it could get more engagement, or if it was simply not interesting enough per-word for most people in its target audience to read to the end and vote on it. The main intuition I wanted to convey in this post is how powerful systems might be constructed in the near future, by composing "non-agentic" foundation models in relatively simple ways. And further, that there are ways this leads to extreme danger / failure even before we get to the point of having to worry about even more powerful systems reflecting, deceiving, power-seeking, or exhibiting other more exotic examples of POUDA.I'll highlight one quote from this piece, which I think is a nice distillation of a key insight for making accurate predictions about how the immediate future of LLMs is likely to play out: Training GPT-4 was the w...

Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: Eliezer on The Lunar Society podcast, published by Max H on April 6, 2023 on LessWrong. Another podcast appearance. Great to see Eliezer on a real media blitz tour. For 4 hours, I tried to come up reasons for why AI might not kill us all, and Eliezer Yudkowsky explained why I was wrong. We also discuss his call to halt AI, why LLMs make alignment harder, what it would take to save humanity, his millions of words of sci-fi, and much more. If you want to get to the crux of the conversation, fast forward to 2:35:00 through 3:43:54. Here we go through and debate the main reasons I still think doom is unlikely. Watch on YouTube. Listen on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or any other podcast platform. Read the full transcript here. Follow me on Twitter for updates on future episodes. Youtube: Full transcript:#details Thanks for listening. To help us out with The Nonlinear Library or to learn more, please visit nonlinear.org.

Organizational leaders can use the power of behavioral economics to not only make better decisions themselves, but by leading their employees, their customers, and their stakeholders to make wiser decisions, make the company more effective, and also make society better off as a result.Max H. Bazerman is Professor of Business Administration at the Harvard Business School and the Co-Director of the Center for Public Leadership at the Harvard Kennedy School. Don A. Moore is Professor in Leadership and Communication at Berkeley Haas and serves as Associate Dean for Academic Affairs. Their most recent book “Decision Leadership: Empowering Others to Make Better Choices" deals with how successful leaders can maximize the potential of others by empowering them to make better decisions.Max and Don are joining Greg to discuss how thinking systematically can help leaders make better decisions and create an environment for more people within their organizations to make more deliberate, smarter, and more ethical decisions.They are also exchanging ideas about the importance of empowering employees and rewarding wise decision-making within organizations, even when that means taking a risk.*unSILOed Podcast is produced by University FM.*Episode Quotes:On helping leaders create better decisions for their organizations[Max H. Bazerman] 10:50: When we think about leadership, we often think about people moving heavy objects from one side of the factory to the other. That isn't what most of our leaders coming out of Haas and HBS are doing these days. They're guiding an organization to make better decisions. And that's where the decision factory idea comes from, and that's where our motivation comes from—to help leaders create better decisions throughout their organization.Encouraging decision-makers to have leadership perspective[Don A. Moore] 12:34: We want to encourage decision-makers to think broadly about their interests and the interests of those who are affected by their decisions. That is the leader's perspective—not just what serves my interests but the long-term interests of the stakeholders, the organization, and others affected by my decisions, those who depend on me, and those I influence.Everyone has the power to exercise leadership[Don A.Moore] 50:25: If leadership is about affecting the behavior of those around us, then each and every one of us has some power to exercise leadership. Now, by virtue of their structural location in the organization, some of us have more such influence than others. But it is common for people to make the mistake of underestimating how much influence they have to guide the thinking and behavior of those around them.On being a good mentor[Max H. Bazerman] 36:17: One of the things that made me good as a mentor, and probably what I've been best at in my career, is not just telling them what to do but benefiting from what they can do better than I can do and bringing that together in an integrated way.Show Links:Recommended Resources:Howard Raiffa “The Art and Science of Negotiation”Cass SunsteinDavid LaibsonMichael NortonDaniel KahnemanKeith StanovichRichard WestunSILOed - John List EpisodeunSILOed - Max H. Bazerman episodeunSILOed - Don A. Moore episodeGuest Profile:Max H. Bazerman Faculty Profile at Harvard Business SchoolMax H. Bazerman on TwitterDon A. Moore Faculty Profile at Berkeley HaasProfessional Profile on Psychology TodayAuthor's Profile on HarperCollins PublishersDon A. Moore on LinkedInDon A. Moore on TwitterTheir Work:New Book: Decision Leadership: Empowering Others to Make Better ChoicesJudgment in Managerial Decision MakingMax H. Bazerman WorkMax H. Bazerman on Google ScholarThe Power of Experiments: Decision Making in a Data-Driven World The Power of Noticing: What the Best Leaders SeeBlind Spots: Why We Fail to Do What's Right and What to Do about ItNegotiation Genius: How to Overcome Obstacles and Achieve Brilliant Results at the Bargaining Table and BeyondPredictable Surprises: The Disasters You Should Have Seen Coming, and How to Prevent Them (Leadership for the Common Good)Don A. Moore WorkDon A. Moore on Google ScholarPerfectly Confident: How to Calibrate Your Decisions Wisely

This presentation is based on Max Bazerman's book by the same name as the title of the talk (Harper Business, 2020): Every day, you make hundreds of decisions. They're largely personal, but these choices have an ethical component as well; you value certain principles and ends over others. Better, Not Perfect provides a prescriptive roadmap on how to maximize the pleasure and minimize pain that you create.  Melding philosophy and psychology, participants will leave this session with an audit of how they can achieve their maximum sustainable level of goodness.View the original talk and video here.Effective Altruism is a social movement dedicated to finding ways to do the most good possible, whether through charitable donations, career choices, or volunteer projects. EA Global conferences are gatherings for EAs to meet.Effective Altruism is a social movement dedicated to finding ways to do the most good possible, whether through charitable donations, career choices, or volunteer projects. EA Global conferences are gatherings for EAs to meet. You can also listen to this talk along with its accompanying video on YouTube.

Today I talk to Dr. Max H. Bazerman, the Jesse Isidor Straus Professor of Business Administration at the Harvard Business School. Max and I discuss his new book, "Complicit," and explore the root causes of complicity, how it's enabled and how to stop it. What We Discuss with Max H. Bazerman While It is easy to blame obvious offenders, we rarely consider the many people supporting their unethical or criminal behaviors. There was a corroborating cast of people who were complicit: business partners, investors, news organizations, employees, and others. And, whether we're aware of it or not, most of us have been complicit in the unscrupulous behavior of others. We explore complicity through the stories of McKinsey, Arthur Andersen, Theranos, ExxonMobile, and BP and learn valuable lessons on not only what creates complicity but our role in allowing it to happen. --►Purchase Complicit: https://amzn.to/3E5b5ck  (Amazon Link) Full show notes and resources can be found here: https://passionstruck.com/max-h-bazerman-how-to-overcome-complicity/  Brought to you by Indeed, Masterclass, and InsideTracker. --► For information about advertisers and promo codes, go to: https://passionstruck.com/deals/  --► Prefer to watch this interview: https://youtu.be/tbgI2kwidmA  Like this show? Please leave us a review here -- even one sentence helps! Consider including your Twitter or Instagram handle so we can thank you personally! --► Subscribe to Our YouTube Channel Here: https://www.youtube.com/c/JohnRMiles Want to find your purpose in life? I provide my six simple steps to achieving it - passionstruck.com/5-simple-steps-to-find-your-passion-in-life/ Did you hear my interview with Robin Sharma, one of the top personal mastery and leadership coaches in the world and a multiple-time number-one New York Times best-selling author? Catch up with episode 209: Robin Sharma on Why Changing the World Starts by Changing Ourselves ===== FOLLOW ON THE SOCIALS ===== * Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/passion_struck_podcast * Gear: https://www.zazzle.com/store/passion_sruck_podcast Learn more about John: https://johnrmiles.com/ 

It is easy to condemn obvious wrongdoers such as Elizabeth Holmes, Adam Neumann, Harvey Weinstein, and the Sackler family. But we rarely think about the many people who supported their unethical or criminal behavior. In each case there was a supporting cast of complicitors: business partners, employees, investors, news organizations, and others. And, whether we're aware of it or not, almost all of us have been complicit in the unethical behavior of others. In Complicit: How We Enable the Unethical and How to Stop (Princeton UP, 2022), Harvard Business School professor Max Bazerman confronts our complicity head-on and offers strategies for recognizing and avoiding the psychological and other traps that lead us to ignore, condone, or actively support wrongdoing in our businesses, organizations, communities, politics, and more. Complicit tells compelling stories of those who enabled the Theranos and WeWork scandals, the opioid crisis, the sexual abuse that led to the #MeToo movement, and the January 6th U.S. Capitol attack. The book describes seven different behavioral profiles that can lead to complicity in wrongdoing, ranging from true partners to those who unknowingly benefit from systemic privilege, including white privilege, and it tells the story of Bazerman's own brushes with complicity. Complicit also offers concrete and detailed solutions, describing how individuals, leaders, and organizations can more effectively prevent complicity. By challenging the notion that a few bad apples are responsible for society's ills, Complicit implicates us all--and offers a path to creating a more ethical world. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

It is easy to condemn obvious wrongdoers such as Elizabeth Holmes, Adam Neumann, Harvey Weinstein, and the Sackler family. But we rarely think about the many people who supported their unethical or criminal behavior. In each case there was a supporting cast of complicitors: business partners, employees, investors, news organizations, and others. And, whether we're aware of it or not, almost all of us have been complicit in the unethical behavior of others. In Complicit: How We Enable the Unethical and How to Stop (Princeton UP, 2022), Harvard Business School professor Max Bazerman confronts our complicity head-on and offers strategies for recognizing and avoiding the psychological and other traps that lead us to ignore, condone, or actively support wrongdoing in our businesses, organizations, communities, politics, and more. Complicit tells compelling stories of those who enabled the Theranos and WeWork scandals, the opioid crisis, the sexual abuse that led to the #MeToo movement, and the January 6th U.S. Capitol attack. The book describes seven different behavioral profiles that can lead to complicity in wrongdoing, ranging from true partners to those who unknowingly benefit from systemic privilege, including white privilege, and it tells the story of Bazerman's own brushes with complicity. Complicit also offers concrete and detailed solutions, describing how individuals, leaders, and organizations can more effectively prevent complicity. By challenging the notion that a few bad apples are responsible for society's ills, Complicit implicates us all--and offers a path to creating a more ethical world. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science

It is easy to condemn obvious wrongdoers such as Elizabeth Holmes, Adam Neumann, Harvey Weinstein, and the Sackler family. But we rarely think about the many people who supported their unethical or criminal behavior. In each case there was a supporting cast of complicitors: business partners, employees, investors, news organizations, and others. And, whether we're aware of it or not, almost all of us have been complicit in the unethical behavior of others. In Complicit: How We Enable the Unethical and How to Stop (Princeton UP, 2022), Harvard Business School professor Max Bazerman confronts our complicity head-on and offers strategies for recognizing and avoiding the psychological and other traps that lead us to ignore, condone, or actively support wrongdoing in our businesses, organizations, communities, politics, and more. Complicit tells compelling stories of those who enabled the Theranos and WeWork scandals, the opioid crisis, the sexual abuse that led to the #MeToo movement, and the January 6th U.S. Capitol attack. The book describes seven different behavioral profiles that can lead to complicity in wrongdoing, ranging from true partners to those who unknowingly benefit from systemic privilege, including white privilege, and it tells the story of Bazerman's own brushes with complicity. Complicit also offers concrete and detailed solutions, describing how individuals, leaders, and organizations can more effectively prevent complicity. By challenging the notion that a few bad apples are responsible for society's ills, Complicit implicates us all--and offers a path to creating a more ethical world. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/sociology

It is easy to condemn obvious wrongdoers such as Elizabeth Holmes, Adam Neumann, Harvey Weinstein, and the Sackler family. But we rarely think about the many people who supported their unethical or criminal behavior. In each case there was a supporting cast of complicitors: business partners, employees, investors, news organizations, and others. And, whether we're aware of it or not, almost all of us have been complicit in the unethical behavior of others. In Complicit: How We Enable the Unethical and How to Stop (Princeton UP, 2022), Harvard Business School professor Max Bazerman confronts our complicity head-on and offers strategies for recognizing and avoiding the psychological and other traps that lead us to ignore, condone, or actively support wrongdoing in our businesses, organizations, communities, politics, and more. Complicit tells compelling stories of those who enabled the Theranos and WeWork scandals, the opioid crisis, the sexual abuse that led to the #MeToo movement, and the January 6th U.S. Capitol attack. The book describes seven different behavioral profiles that can lead to complicity in wrongdoing, ranging from true partners to those who unknowingly benefit from systemic privilege, including white privilege, and it tells the story of Bazerman's own brushes with complicity. Complicit also offers concrete and detailed solutions, describing how individuals, leaders, and organizations can more effectively prevent complicity. By challenging the notion that a few bad apples are responsible for society's ills, Complicit implicates us all--and offers a path to creating a more ethical world. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/psychology

It is easy to condemn obvious wrongdoers such as Elizabeth Holmes, Adam Neumann, Harvey Weinstein, and the Sackler family. But we rarely think about the many people who supported their unethical or criminal behavior. In each case there was a supporting cast of complicitors: business partners, employees, investors, news organizations, and others. And, whether we're aware of it or not, almost all of us have been complicit in the unethical behavior of others. In Complicit: How We Enable the Unethical and How to Stop (Princeton UP, 2022), Harvard Business School professor Max Bazerman confronts our complicity head-on and offers strategies for recognizing and avoiding the psychological and other traps that lead us to ignore, condone, or actively support wrongdoing in our businesses, organizations, communities, politics, and more. Complicit tells compelling stories of those who enabled the Theranos and WeWork scandals, the opioid crisis, the sexual abuse that led to the #MeToo movement, and the January 6th U.S. Capitol attack. The book describes seven different behavioral profiles that can lead to complicity in wrongdoing, ranging from true partners to those who unknowingly benefit from systemic privilege, including white privilege, and it tells the story of Bazerman's own brushes with complicity. Complicit also offers concrete and detailed solutions, describing how individuals, leaders, and organizations can more effectively prevent complicity. By challenging the notion that a few bad apples are responsible for society's ills, Complicit implicates us all--and offers a path to creating a more ethical world.

It is easy to condemn obvious wrongdoers such as Elizabeth Holmes, Adam Neumann, Harvey Weinstein, and the Sackler family. But we rarely think about the many people who supported their unethical or criminal behavior. In each case there was a supporting cast of complicitors: business partners, employees, investors, news organizations, and others. And, whether we're aware of it or not, almost all of us have been complicit in the unethical behavior of others. In Complicit: How We Enable the Unethical and How to Stop (Princeton UP, 2022), Harvard Business School professor Max Bazerman confronts our complicity head-on and offers strategies for recognizing and avoiding the psychological and other traps that lead us to ignore, condone, or actively support wrongdoing in our businesses, organizations, communities, politics, and more. Complicit tells compelling stories of those who enabled the Theranos and WeWork scandals, the opioid crisis, the sexual abuse that led to the #MeToo movement, and the January 6th U.S. Capitol attack. The book describes seven different behavioral profiles that can lead to complicity in wrongdoing, ranging from true partners to those who unknowingly benefit from systemic privilege, including white privilege, and it tells the story of Bazerman's own brushes with complicity. Complicit also offers concrete and detailed solutions, describing how individuals, leaders, and organizations can more effectively prevent complicity. By challenging the notion that a few bad apples are responsible for society's ills, Complicit implicates us all--and offers a path to creating a more ethical world. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/public-policy

It is easy to condemn obvious wrongdoers such as Elizabeth Holmes, Adam Neumann, Harvey Weinstein, and the Sackler family. But we rarely think about the many people who supported their unethical or criminal behavior. In each case there was a supporting cast of complicitors: business partners, employees, investors, news organizations, and others. And, whether we're aware of it or not, almost all of us have been complicit in the unethical behavior of others. In Complicit: How We Enable the Unethical and How to Stop (Princeton UP, 2022), Harvard Business School professor Max Bazerman confronts our complicity head-on and offers strategies for recognizing and avoiding the psychological and other traps that lead us to ignore, condone, or actively support wrongdoing in our businesses, organizations, communities, politics, and more. Complicit tells compelling stories of those who enabled the Theranos and WeWork scandals, the opioid crisis, the sexual abuse that led to the #MeToo movement, and the January 6th U.S. Capitol attack. The book describes seven different behavioral profiles that can lead to complicity in wrongdoing, ranging from true partners to those who unknowingly benefit from systemic privilege, including white privilege, and it tells the story of Bazerman's own brushes with complicity. Complicit also offers concrete and detailed solutions, describing how individuals, leaders, and organizations can more effectively prevent complicity. By challenging the notion that a few bad apples are responsible for society's ills, Complicit implicates us all--and offers a path to creating a more ethical world. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/economics

It is easy to condemn obvious wrongdoers such as Elizabeth Holmes, Adam Neumann, Harvey Weinstein, and the Sackler family. But we rarely think about the many people who supported their unethical or criminal behavior. In each case there was a supporting cast of complicitors: business partners, employees, investors, news organizations, and others. And, whether we're aware of it or not, almost all of us have been complicit in the unethical behavior of others. In Complicit: How We Enable the Unethical and How to Stop (Princeton UP, 2022), Harvard Business School professor Max Bazerman confronts our complicity head-on and offers strategies for recognizing and avoiding the psychological and other traps that lead us to ignore, condone, or actively support wrongdoing in our businesses, organizations, communities, politics, and more. Complicit tells compelling stories of those who enabled the Theranos and WeWork scandals, the opioid crisis, the sexual abuse that led to the #MeToo movement, and the January 6th U.S. Capitol attack. The book describes seven different behavioral profiles that can lead to complicity in wrongdoing, ranging from true partners to those who unknowingly benefit from systemic privilege, including white privilege, and it tells the story of Bazerman's own brushes with complicity. Complicit also offers concrete and detailed solutions, describing how individuals, leaders, and organizations can more effectively prevent complicity. By challenging the notion that a few bad apples are responsible for society's ills, Complicit implicates us all--and offers a path to creating a more ethical world. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law

Rosemary tries to hold it together at the base; Isaiah meets the Krematorian. From the creators of the Maeltopia podcast.EARLY ACCESS to podcast episodes, behind-the-scenes bonus videos with the Maeltopia team and more await you on our Patreon!Join us on Discord!Follow us on Twitter at @maeltopiaWant to learn more about the world of Maeltopia? Check out our website!Be sure to like, comment, rate and review us on Apple Podcasts or your favorite podcast platform! We appreciate your support!Credits:Written by Mark AnzaloneEdited by Walker KornfeldSound mastering by Steven J. Anzalone--Isaiah Stroud voiced by Mark AnzaloneRosemary Stroud voiced by Kelly BairMysterian Gand voiced by Mark AnzaloneGillstrix voiced by Mark AnzaloneSoldiers voiced by Mark AnzaloneMr. Sugar voiced by Mark AnzaloneTagus voiced by Mark AnzaloneDoll Face voiced by Kelly BairThe Krematorian voiced by Kelly BairThe Sleep Wake Cycle Theme by Steven J. AnzaloneIntro and Outro music by Steven AnzaloneMusic by Jordan Hatfield, Archimusic, Jay Varton, Shahead Mostafafar, Flying Aces, and Max H.Music and Sound effects are licensed from third party providers including Envato, Epidemic Sound, Artlist, Soundstripe, Melody Loops, Pond 5 and Music VineDisclaimer:niac, crazy, psychosis etc., this show is written and produced by a team that live with some of the specific illnesses featured within, including Tourette's syndrome, schizoaffective disorder, insomnia, obsessive compulsive disorder, hallucinations, delusions, anxiety and depressive conditions, among others. Our team also features an academic background in neurology and psychology that has been drawn on to aim for sensitivity and accuracy. The intent of the language and experiences within the Sleep/Wake Cycle, and the extended works of Maeltopia, are designed to explore these conditions and their related isolation and degradation as experienced first hand. The world of Maeltopia is one where the mentally unwell are the majority. Yet there are still outliers who are hunted out. Content warnings: Murderers Audio Hallucinations Visual Hallucinations Fear of the Dark Menacing AgenciesDerogatory terms for Mental IllnessDiscussions of religionBody Horror Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Trying to lay low until their next assignment, the twins arrive in Emmit's Threshold, a serene sprawling wetland. After getting settled in, Rosemary has an uninvited guest and Isaiah revisits old sins. From the creators of the Maeltopia podcast.EARLY ACCESS to podcast episodes, behind-the-scenes bonus videos with the Maeltopia team and more await you on our Patreon!Join us on Discord!Follow us on Twitter at @maeltopiaWant to learn more about the world of Maeltopia? Check out our website!Be sure to like, comment, rate and review us on Apple Podcasts or your favorite podcast platform! We appreciate your support!Credits:Written by Mark AnzaloneEdited by Walker KornfeldSound mastering by Steven J. Anzalone--Isaiah Stroud voiced by Mark AnzaloneRosemary Stroud voiced by Kelly BairMister Sugar voiced by Mark Anzalone--The Sleep Wake Cycle Theme by Steven J. AnzaloneIntro and Outro music by Steven AnzaloneMusic by JH Coleman, John Hayes, Justin Marshall Elias, Adi Goldstein, Martin Landstrom, and Max H.Music and Sound effects are licensed from third party providers including Envato, Epidemic Sound, Artlist, Soundstripe, Melody Loops, and Music VineDisclaimer:This show is written in a first-hand, first-person format from uncertain and inconsistent narrators. This show explores specific mental health conditions. Whilst there is consistent use of derogatory terms for those with specific conditions or neurodivergence including lunatic, maniac, crazy, psychosis etc., this show is written and produced by a team that live with some of the specific illnesses featured within, including Tourette's syndrome, schizoaffective disorder, insomnia, obsessive compulsive disorder, hallucinations, delusions, anxiety and depressive conditions, among others. Our team also features an academic background in neurology and psychology that has been drawn on to aim for sensitivity and accuracy. The intent of the language and experiences within the Sleep/Wake Cycle, and the extended works of Maeltopia, are designed to explore these conditions and their related isolation and degradation as experienced first hand. The world of Maeltopia is one where the mentally unwell are the majority. Yet there are still outliers who are hunted out. Content warnings: Murderers Audio Hallucinations Visual Hallucinations Fear of the Dark Menacing AgenciesDerogatory terms for Mental IllnessDiscussions of religion See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.