Podcasts about Staiger

Quand le parfum s'invite dans l'univers des boissons, il suscite des initiatives originales, qui marient joyeusement les univers olfactifs et gustatifs. Co-fondatrice de la marque de liqueurs H.Theoria, Marlène Staiger collabore avec des maisons de parfum ou encore des artistes. Parfumeur créateur, Jean-Charles Sommerard accompagne de grands fabricants de boissons, distillant une approche tournée vers le bien-être et les émotions. Ils évoquent ensemble leur travail de création à la croisée des chemins.Une table ronde enregistrée lors de la Paris Perfume Week 2024 et animée par Sarah Bouasse.---- Podcasts by Nez, le rendez-vous audio de la culture olfactive - https://podcasts.bynez.com---Retrouvez tous nos podcasts sur les plates-formes habituelles (Spotify, Deezer, Amazon Music, Apple Podcasts, Youtube) Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

Dr. Melinda Staiger, radiologist and the Director of Clinical Operations at the Carol M. Baldwin Breast Care Center at Stony Brook Medicine, joins Heart of The East End Gianna Volpe on WLIW-FM to talk about cutting-edge imaging technologies being used to detect breast cancer by Stony Brook Medicine amidst breast cancer awareness month. Listen to the playlist on Apple Music

„Leider ist die Antwort nicht immer: Klar Deutschland“: Hendrik Staiger ist einer von Deutschlands führenden Experten, wenn es um Unternehmensimmobilien geht. Für viele sind die nicht so sexy, für Hendrik die Assetklasse, die breit aufgestellt ist, deren Nutzungen von Industrie und Forschung bis zu Kultur und Freizeit reichen. Gerade jetzt komme es auf den Wirtschaftsstandort Deutschland an, vor allem auf die Rahmenbedingungen, die die Politik schafft. Die BEOS, Teil der Swiss Life, besitzt eine Menge Reputation in der Bestandsentwicklung, hat 160 Projekte und damit 4,4 Millionen Quadratmeter im Portfolio, legt eigene Fonds auf. Es geht also in unserem Gespräch um Standorte, Expansionsstrategie und die Transaktionsabteilung, die langsam wieder Stress hat. Wir sprechen über Life Science und über Hendriks spannenden Lebenslauf: Er ist studierter Physiker und hat in der Forschung gearbeitet. Wie sollte es anders sein: Dass er heute in der Immobilienbranche tätig ist, verdankt er einer Frau, seiner Frau. Zudem geht es um wirtschaftliche Lebendigkeit, resiliente Lieferketten, Transformation der Automobilindustrie, den Anspruch an Flexibilität, um Missleading, den ganzheitlichen BEOS- sowie den MietervorInvestoren-Ansatz. Jede Menge Themen und jeder Menge Herzblut von Hendrik Staiger, der auch im Verband Crenet involviert ist, in dem es ebenfalls um Hendriks Passion geht: Unternehmensimmobilien.

Ever wondered what it's really like to ditch your nonprofit job and start a consulting business with your work buddy? Today, we're pulling back the curtain on that exact scenario. No sugar-coating, no BS - just the raw, unfiltered truth about what it takes to build a values-driven consulting firm from the ground up.Sarah Steiger joins us to share the rollercoaster journey of how she and her former boss, Laura, transitioned from nonprofit employees to co-founders of Steiger Vitelli and Associates. Buckle up, because this conversation gets real fast.From their "aha" moment on Laura's back porch to navigating the murky waters of pricing and client acquisition, Sarah holds nothing back. We dive deep into the nitty-gritty of building a business that aligns with your values (hello, community-centric fundraising!) while still paying the bills.But it's not all sunshine and rainbows, folks. Sarah gets real about the challenges of putting yourself out there as a consultant and dealing with criticism. Spoiler alert: sometimes it involves hiding under the covers with your dog for a few hours. (No judgment here!)Key Takeaways:Volunteer gigs can be a goldmine for future clients. Don't underestimate the power of showing up and doing good work, even when you're not getting paid.Your values can be your superpower. Sarah and Laura's commitment to community-centric fundraising principles has become their unique selling point.Partnerships can be a game-changer. Two heads (and two sets of skills) really can be better than one when it comes to building a consulting business.Self-care isn't just a buzzword. It's crucial for surviving the emotional rollercoaster of entrepreneurship. Sometimes that means taking a mid-day break to ugly cry or read a book.Pricing is an art, not a science. Don't be afraid to get creative with your pricing structure to align with your values and serve your ideal clients.Look, starting a consulting business isn't for the faint of heart. It's messy, it's challenging, and sometimes it downright sucks. But for those of you ready to take the leap, this episode is packed with hard-earned wisdom and practical insights. Whether you're just starting out or looking to level up your existing practice, Sarah's story will give you plenty to chew on. 

Achtung (Werbung in eigener Sache):  Jetzt mein Buch "Die perfekte Candidate Journey & Experience" unter folgenden Links bestellen: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-662-66875-7 https://bit.ly/3KEgwDF https://amzn.to/3mbzhUO Der inhaltliche Fokus liegt auf Recruiting für mittelständische Unternehmen sowie Startups und darum, wie die Candidate Journey und deren Touchpoints so gestaltet werden können, dass eine hervorragende Candidate Experience möglich wird.   Themen Tolle Gäste durfte ich auch wieder im Juni 2024 in meinem GainTalents-Podcast begrüßen. Wir haben über Coaching von Mitarbeitenden, Employer Branding, Führung im Kontext Transformation und über Personalstrategien zur Umsetzung von Digitalisierung bei Familienunternehmen gesprochen. Meine wichtigsten Erkenntnisse und Key Learnings aus diesen Gesprächen habe ich wie immer in dieser Folge für Euch aufbereitet. Viel Spaß beim Reinhören und beim Wissensaufbau!

Achtung (Werbung in eigener Sache):  Jetzt mein Buch "Die perfekte Candidate Journey & Experience" unter folgenden Links bestellen: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-662-66875-7 https://bit.ly/3KEgwDF https://amzn.to/3mbzhUO Der inhaltliche Fokus liegt auf Recruiting für mittelständische Unternehmen sowie Startups und darum, wie die Candidate Journey und deren Touchpoints so gestaltet werden können, dass eine hervorragende Candidate Experience möglich wird.   Themen Tolle Gäste durfte ich auch wieder im Juni 2024 in meinem GainTalents-Podcast begrüßen. Wir haben über Coaching von Mitarbeitenden, Employer Branding, Führung im Kontext Transformation und über Personalstrategien zur Umsetzung von Digitalisierung bei Familienunternehmen gesprochen. Meine wichtigsten Erkenntnisse und Key Learnings aus diesen Gesprächen habe ich wie immer in dieser Folge für Euch aufbereitet. Viel Spaß beim Reinhören und beim Wissensaufbau!

Erste Aufnahme in PA´s neuem Heim, alle starten enstpannt um sich dann erstmal über Gesundheit auszutauschen. Im Anschluß geht es um PA´s MCM Outfit und die Reaktion von Massiv um dann über brisantere Themen wie zum Beispiel Gate Keeping im Deutschrap zu sprechen.

Achtung (Werbung in eigener Sache):  Jetzt mein Buch "Die perfekte Candidate Journey & Experience" unter folgenden Links bestellen: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-662-66875-7 https://bit.ly/3KEgwDF https://amzn.to/3mbzhUO Der inhaltliche Fokus liegt auf Recruiting für mittelständische Unternehmen sowie Startups und darum, wie die Candidate Journey und deren Touchpoints so gestaltet werden können, dass eine hervorragende Candidate Experience möglich wird. Julia Staiger (Head of Employer Branding bei Decathlon Deutschland) Julia Staiger ist Head of Employer Branding bei Decathlon Deutschland und bereits seit einigen Jahren im Employer Branding unterwegs. Julia weiß, was es bedeutet, sich auf die strategische Reise zu einer identitätsbasierten und ehrlichen Arbeitgeberpositionierung zu machen. Natürlich immer mit einer Portion Euphorie im Gepäck. Dabei setzt Julia einen klaren Fokus darauf, die Arbeitgeberpositionierung bei DECATHLON intern erlebbar zu machen und in den Köpfen und Herzen der bestehenden Teams zu verankern. Denn nur wer das, was extern versprochen wird, auch intern halten kann, wird langfristig die passenden Talente begeistern. Und genau darüber sprechen wir heute...   Themen In der GainTalents-Podcastfolge 357 war Julia Staiger (Head of Employer Branding bei Decathlon Deutschland) in ihrer Podcast-Premiere bei mir zu Gast. Julia hat über die Umsetzung der Employer Branding Strategie bei Ihrem Arbeitgeber Decathlon berichtet. Herzlichen Dank an Julia für die super guten Insider-Informationen und die vielen guten Tipps zum Thema Employer Branding. Employer Branding bei Decathlon Beginn des Employer Branding Prozesses im Jahr 2018 Interne und externe Positionierung von Decathlon als Arbeitgeber (Decathlon ist Euphorie) Einbindung von mehreren Unternehmensbereichen heute kümmert sich ein Team von vier Personen um Employer Branding Strategische Reise und Herausforderungen Wachstum von Decathlon von 10 auf 90 Filialen und der Bedarf an Employer Branding Wichtigkeit der internen Positionierung und EVP (Employer Value Proposition) sowie der kulturellen Verankerung Herausforderungen und Umwege, die während des Prozesses auftraten Bedeutung von Employer Branding als kontinuierlicher Prozess Maßnahmen zur Verbesserung des Employer Brandings Wichtigkeit der internen Kommunikation und der kulturellen Verankerung Einbindung der Mitarbeiter und deren Feedback - Sichtbarkeit der Positionierung verstärken Kreative Lösungen und Flexibilität im Prozess, Veränderungen begleiten Zusammenarbeit und Schnittstellen innerhalb des People-Teams und auch mit anderen Abteilungen im Unternehmen   #Employerbranding #Employervalueproposition #Employeeexperience #Recruiting #Talentgewinnung #Retention #GainTalentspodcast   Shownotes Links - Julia Staiger LinkedIn       https://www.linkedin.com/in/julia-staiger-345406219 Website        https://einblicke.decathlon.de/ und https://decathlon-karriere.de/                 Links Hans-Heinz Wisotzky:  Website https://www.gaintalents.com/podcast und https://www.gaintalents.com/blog Buch: https://www.gaintalents.com/buch-die-perfekte-candidate-journey-und-experience LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/in/hansheinzwisotzky/ LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/company/gaintalents XING https://www.xing.com/profile/HansHeinz_Wisotzky/cv Facebook https://www.facebook.com/GainTalents Instagram https://www.instagram.com/gain.talents/ Youtube https://bit.ly/2GnWMFg

Achtung (Werbung in eigener Sache):  Jetzt mein Buch "Die perfekte Candidate Journey & Experience" unter folgenden Links bestellen: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-662-66875-7 https://bit.ly/3KEgwDF https://amzn.to/3mbzhUO Der inhaltliche Fokus liegt auf Recruiting für mittelständische Unternehmen sowie Startups und darum, wie die Candidate Journey und deren Touchpoints so gestaltet werden können, dass eine hervorragende Candidate Experience möglich wird. Julia Staiger (Head of Employer Branding bei Decathlon Deutschland) Julia Staiger ist Head of Employer Branding bei Decathlon Deutschland und bereits seit einigen Jahren im Employer Branding unterwegs. Julia weiß, was es bedeutet, sich auf die strategische Reise zu einer identitätsbasierten und ehrlichen Arbeitgeberpositionierung zu machen. Natürlich immer mit einer Portion Euphorie im Gepäck. Dabei setzt Julia einen klaren Fokus darauf, die Arbeitgeberpositionierung bei DECATHLON intern erlebbar zu machen und in den Köpfen und Herzen der bestehenden Teams zu verankern. Denn nur wer das, was extern versprochen wird, auch intern halten kann, wird langfristig die passenden Talente begeistern. Und genau darüber sprechen wir heute...   Themen In der GainTalents-Podcastfolge 357 war Julia Staiger (Head of Employer Branding bei Decathlon Deutschland) in ihrer Podcast-Premiere bei mir zu Gast. Julia hat über die Umsetzung der Employer Branding Strategie bei Ihrem Arbeitgeber Decathlon berichtet. Herzlichen Dank an Julia für die super guten Insider-Informationen und die vielen guten Tipps zum Thema Employer Branding. Employer Branding bei Decathlon Beginn des Employer Branding Prozesses im Jahr 2018 Interne und externe Positionierung von Decathlon als Arbeitgeber (Decathlon ist Euphorie) Einbindung von mehreren Unternehmensbereichen heute kümmert sich ein Team von vier Personen um Employer Branding Strategische Reise und Herausforderungen Wachstum von Decathlon von 10 auf 90 Filialen und der Bedarf an Employer Branding Wichtigkeit der internen Positionierung und EVP (Employer Value Proposition) sowie der kulturellen Verankerung Herausforderungen und Umwege, die während des Prozesses auftraten Bedeutung von Employer Branding als kontinuierlicher Prozess Maßnahmen zur Verbesserung des Employer Brandings Wichtigkeit der internen Kommunikation und der kulturellen Verankerung Einbindung der Mitarbeiter und deren Feedback - Sichtbarkeit der Positionierung verstärken Kreative Lösungen und Flexibilität im Prozess, Veränderungen begleiten Zusammenarbeit und Schnittstellen innerhalb des People-Teams und auch mit anderen Abteilungen im Unternehmen   #Employerbranding #Employervalueproposition #Employeeexperience #Recruiting #Talentgewinnung #Retention #GainTalentspodcast   Shownotes Links - Julia Staiger LinkedIn       https://www.linkedin.com/in/julia-staiger-345406219 Website        https://einblicke.decathlon.de/ und https://decathlon-karriere.de/                 Links Hans-Heinz Wisotzky:  Website https://www.gaintalents.com/podcast und https://www.gaintalents.com/blog Buch: https://www.gaintalents.com/buch-die-perfekte-candidate-journey-und-experience LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/in/hansheinzwisotzky/ LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/company/gaintalents XING https://www.xing.com/profile/HansHeinz_Wisotzky/cv Facebook https://www.facebook.com/GainTalents Instagram https://www.instagram.com/gain.talents/ Youtube https://bit.ly/2GnWMFg

When you think of care workers what comes to mind? For me, I imagined nurses, nurses aids, home healthcare workers, hospice workers...so when Allison told me the care workers she started working with was MOTHERS I had to truly reflect on my own biases! And yet, in some ways, mothers are the ultimate care workers. In this conversation Allison unfolds her journey as a care worker (social worker and therapist) working with other care workers and the patterns that became clear to her through this work--and how that lead her to incorporate CARE and a LEADERSHIP practice. Allison shines such a clear light on this topic--a topic that is woven through with patriarchal, capitalist, and white supremacy culture beliefs and norms. We discuss: •Care work as a valuable leadership practice. •Care work, patriarchy, and resistance. •Trauma-informed care and coaching for therapists and other care professionals. •Weaponizing care skills in oppressive systems. •Matriarchal vs patriarchal business values and their impact on leadership, growth, and sustainability.   Please share this episode and subscribe and review! Thank you! LINKS: Allison's website: https://www.welcometothematriarchy.com/ Elijah on IG: https://www.instagram.com/elijahshannonselby/

Does your org face the frustration of constantly losing your best fundraisers? Higher salaries, the pressure of unrealistic expectations, feeling undervalued, and being micromanaged are driving talented fundraisers out of the sector. In this episode of The Small Nonprofit, fundraising expert Laura Vitelli shares practical insights on how small nonprofits can break this cycle. We discuss the current challenges nonprofits face with attracting and retaining top fundraising talent, and how a focus on values alignment, flexibility, and collaborative leadership can make all the difference.Laura Vitelli is a seasoned fundraiser with over 30 years of experience and co-founder of Staiger, VITELLI & Associates. Laura and her business partner Sarah Staiger specialize in helping nonprofits create sustainable fundraising systems through value-based strategies. Together, they provide coaching, training, and strategic planning support to small and mid-sized organizations.Key Takeaways:Values matter more than ever. Fundraisers are seeking organizations that align with their values and provide opportunities for meaningful conversations around complex issues.Flexibility is key. Options like remote or hybrid work and even the potential for a four-day workweek are becoming major incentives for fundraising talent.Lead with humility and transparency. Leaders who openly admit what they don't know and actively unlearn outdated practices create a supportive environment for growth.Trust your fundraisers. Let them lead on strategy and goal setting. Unrealistic goals and lack of autonomy can lead to burnout and turnover.Invest in your people. Offering competitive salaries, benefits, and ongoing professional development demonstrates that you value your fundraising team's well-being and contributions.Don't forget to become a supporter of our show!Watch this episode on Youtube: https://youtu.be/rv7hdVLFDy4 Links and Resources: Connect with Laura Vitelli on Linkedin: linkedin.com/in/laura-vitelliCheck out the Website: https://www.staigervitelli.com/Director of Development Questions Free Download: https://www.staigervitelli.com/dod Connect with Maria on LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/mariario/Support the show: https://www.buzzsprout.com/208666/supporters/newSupport the Show.

Marlène, Master Blender, nous donne sa vision des tendances à venir dans l'univers des spiritueux et du sans alcool. On parlera de l'avènement des liqueurs, des produits fermentés, de l'importance des matières premières et de la difficulté de lever des fonds dans le secteur de l'alcool. Marlène souligne également le potentiel de l'Afrique dans le domaine des spiritueux.Voilà le programme :L'émergence de nouvelles tendances (00:01:17) Apparition de l'amertume, du côté apéritif ancien, du local, du bio, du sans alcool, et des saveurs asiatiques.Réflexions sur la consommation d'alcool (00:05:55) Discussion sur la consommation d'alcool, l'ivresse, la responsabilité des marques, et la consommation raisonnée.Les tendances dans le monde des boissons (00:14:42) Discussion sur l'évolution des goûts, les liqueurs d'assemblage, les fermentations maison, et l'ascension des distillations de grain rares.L'influence des réseaux sociaux et des influenceurs (00:16:48) Réflexion sur l'impact des réseaux sociaux et de l'ère émotionnelle sur les tendances de consommation, la notoriété des marques, et l'évolution du monde des spiritueux.Diversification des services dans l'industrie des boissons (00:25:10) Observations sur la tendance à proposer une diversité de services plutôt que de se concentrer uniquement sur la création de produits, en raison des défis liés à la production et à l'emploi.Les défis de l'entrepreneuriat (00:30:40) Évoque des défis personnels et professionnels rencontrés par les entrepreneurs, notamment liés à la gestion et à la production.La poétique moléculaire (00:35:50) Exploration de la vision et de l'approche de Marlène Steiger concernant la création de "poétique molécule" et la transmission des savoirs sensoriels.Tu peux retrouver Marlène Staiger sur Instagram et sur son Linked In.Et bien sûr, Origines sur l'Instagram.Bonne écoute !L'abus d'alcool est dangereux pour la santé, à consommer avec modération.Hébergé par Ausha. Visitez ausha.co/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

Moi j'adorerais me lancer un jour et créer une marque de spiritueux, mais par où commencer ? La marque, la recette, la cible ?C'est justement le beau programme qu'on t'a concocté avec Marlène ! Elle est Master Blender, autrement dit "maître d'assemblage". Elle travaille à trouver l'équilibre parfait entre des arômes pour te proposer des liqueurs et spiritueux uniques.Recherche de producteurs et inspiration (00:04:27) Discussion sur la recherche de producteurs, l'inspiration et l'admiration pour l'innovation dans la création de boissons.Style, proposition, et recette (00:07:21) Importance d'avoir un style et une proposition distincts, ainsi que la phase de création de la recette.Le processus de création (00:12:27) Le processus de création de spiritueux ou liqueurs, comparaison avec le travail des parfumeurs.Le ciblage et la création (00:23:26) Discussion sur la définition de la cible et l'approche de création dans l'industrie des boissons.Dégustation et retours (00:34:03) Le stress lié à la dégustation de ses spiritueux créés, les retours des clients et les ajustements nécessaires.Travail sur les ingrédients (00:42:22) La réflexion sur l'utilisation des ingrédients lorsqu'on créé une boisson et la diversité des possibilités de création.Sourcing des matières premières (00:48:55) La sélection et l'approvisionnement des matières premières pour ses liqueurs ou spiritueux, en tenant compte de la provenance, des normes de production et des conditions de travail.Tu peux retrouver Marlène Staiger sur Instagram et sur son Linked In.Et bien sûr, Origines sur l'Instagram.Bonne écoute !L'abus d'alcool est dangereux pour la santé, à consommer avec modération.Hébergé par Ausha. Visitez ausha.co/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

Formulation d'arômes, stage chez Gabriel Boudier liquoriste dijonnais et immersion R&D dans une start-up incubatrice Le Laboratoire : c'est parti pour les coulisses du parcours de Marlène Staiger, Master Blender et directrice de création de spiritueux notamment.Voilà le programme :Les molécules aromatiques (00:01:09) : Discussion sur les industries produisant les molécules aromatiques, les parfums, et leur utilisation dans les produits de consommation courante.L'art et la science de l'aromatisation (00:05:33) : Marlène partage son expérience dans la recherche et développement aux côtés de David Edwards et son exploration de l'art et de la science.Le rôle de master blender (00:11:01) : Marlène explique son rôle de master blender, associant l'art, la science, les couleurs et les saveurs dans les assemblages de spiritueux.Collaboration en R&D et contrôle qualité (00:17:05) : Marlène décrit son travail en collaboration avec les équipes R&D et qualité, soulignant l'importance des évaluations sensorielles.Les familles aromatiques (00:25:11) : Elle explique les grandes familles aromatiques, telles que les notes vertes, mentholées, épicées, florales, et fruitées, ainsi que les molécules spécifiques.Histoire et importance de l'odorat (00:27:24) Steiger mentionne l'importance de l'odorat dans l'histoire, avec des références à Brillat-Savarin, la rétro olfaction, et les perceptions culturelles.La rétro olfaction (00:31:58) : Marlène t'explique le concept de rétro olfaction en utilisant l'exemple de manger du chocolat lorsqu'on est enrhumé.Le rôle d'une directrice de la création (00:44:18) : Marlène explique les différentes facettes de son métier de directrice de la création.00:52:41 - Approche de la dégustation et spécificités de l'olfaction : Discussion sur les différentes approches de dégustation et les spécificités de l'olfaction.00:55:55 - Conseils pour développer son odorat : Marlène donne des conseils pour développer la mémoire olfactive et l'identification des odeurs lors d'une dégustation de vin ou de spiritueux.Tu peux retrouver Marlène Staiger sur Instagram et sur son Linked In.Et bien sûr, Origines sur l'Instagram.L'abus d'alcool est dangereux pour la santé, à consommer avec modération.Hébergé par Ausha. Visitez ausha.co/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

Another pod of two halves, as Towells & Seb are joined by German football writer Nik Staiger to preview the Champions League Quarter Final against Bayern Munich, before Lorcan hops in to discuss the two wins against Luton & Brighton.Thanks to Nik for joining us! You can find him on Twitter @Nik_Staiger, and his work on a variety of platforms. Here is a selection of his articles referenced in the podcast:On Bayern's tactics: https://www.bundesliga.com/en/bundesliga/news/tactics-how-might-bayern-munich-approach-der-klassiker-against-borussia-dortmund-tuchel-26698On Xhaka's role at Leverkusen: https://www.bundesliga.com/en/bundesliga/news/granit-xhaka-key-xabi-alonso-player-bayer-leverkusen-title-challenge-26248On Heidenheim 3-2 Bayern (In German): https://www.bundesliga.com/de/bundesliga/news/1-fc-heidenheim-1846-28-spieltag-sieg-fc-bayern-munchen-voith-arena-26891Please subscribe to the pod to never miss an episode, tell your friends to listen if you like it, and leave us a review to let us know what you think! It really helps us out.If you want to send us any questions, or keep up with all things Pot Shot, you can find us on Twitter & Instagram @potshotpod, as well as on Bluesky @potshotpod.bsky.social. Feel free to ping us a DM (or an email via potshotpod@gmail.com)!Follow the Pot Shot Crew on Twitter! (Not "X". We will never call it "X".)Alex: @alexfrcoJake: @JakeWFoxLorcan: @Lxwrites1Manas: @watmanAFCMax: @Max_RadsSeb: @Eulenberg_Towells: @alextowellsWill: @ScoutedSxvYou can find us on the vast majority of good podcast platforms. We'll never say "all" in case we're missing one somehow. If you want to know exactly what podcast platforms we can be found on, you can do so at https://podfollow.com/the-pot-shot-podcast/viewAll music included in the podcast is made by James Blake. He's on all sensible music platforms as JWBlake - you can find his Spotify here: https://open.spotify.com/artist/3XQQbNzsMSiESzHz0qA4r8?si=koS6oXNfSL6SJn3oIR1cxA Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

We had an eye-opening conversation with industry expert Bill Staiger from Bosch, live at the AHR Expo in Chicago. This episode is a deep dive into the critical world of HVAC training, product innovation, and industry challenges.Here's why you can't miss this episode:Training Mastery: Discover why proper training isn't just about ticking boxes – it's about saving lives, boosting productivity, and building trust in the community.Continued Education: Training is the backbone of excellence. Regular knowledge refreshes lead to happier employees and reduced callbacks.Smart Investments: Every hour spent in training can translate to a marked increase in productivity—underlining significant financial benefits.Want to know more? Listen to the full episode on HVAC Revealed, join our Facebook group to share your insights, and check out Bosch's websites for details on their game-changing products.Find Bill:On The Web: https://www.bosch-homecomfort.com/us/en/residential/home/Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/williamstaiger/Join Our Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/hvacrevealedPresented By On Purpose Media: https://www.onpurposemedia.ca/For HVAC Internet Marketing reach out to us at info@onpurposemedia.ca or 888-428-0662Sponsored By: Chiirp: https://chiirp.com/hssrElite Call: https://elitecall.net

Is your major gifts  fundraising aligned with your organization's core values? In today's episode, we're tackling the sometimes intimidating (but rewarding!) world of major gifts through a values-aligned, community-centric lens. We are joined by Sarah Staiger, a fundraiser with over two decades of experience. Sarah is passionate about building power through organized people and organized money. She is a partner at Staiger Vitelli Associates and has been exploring Community-Centric Fundraising methodologies since 2017. She also volunteers with the Minnesota Association of Fundraising Professionals.Key Highlights: Put Values at the Forefront: Join Sarah and I as we dive into how to rethink major donor engagament. It's about connecting on shared values and building something bigger together.Educate and Empower Your Donors: We are done with one-way conversations. Sarah emphasizes the need for continuous donor education and engagement, creating true partnerships and avoiding transactional communications..Values-Based Qualification for Major Gifts: Sarah introduces a transformative concept: using a values-based qualifier alongside financial capacity to identify major gift prospects. This transforms supporters into advocates for your cause.Investing in a Community-Centric Approach:  Sarah makes a compelling case for re-envisioning how we report impact.. She shares how reporting impact in a different manner can lead to crucial cultural shifts within our sector and drive the mission forward.Don't forget to become a supporter of our show!Watch this episode on Youtube: https://youtu.be/VhzvjcgPQcILinks and Resources:  Connect with Sarah on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/staigervitelli/ Sarah's Values-Based Donor Qualification: https://www.staigervitelli.com/vbdqConnect with Maria on LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/mariario/Support the show: https://www.buzzsprout.com/208666/supporters/newSupport the show

"It's not just fear of failure that's holding people back, it's the blame that happens afterwards." – Dustin StaigerToday's featured author is father, husband, business growth strategist, workplace culture advocate, award-winning marketer, and the principal partner at The People Brand, Dustin Staiger. Dustin and I had a chat about his book, “Blame This Book: Rescue Your Workplace Culture from Toxicity & Scapegoating”, the pervasive issue of blame in the workplace, its impact on employee engagement, and the importance of fostering a culture of responsibility and accountability. Key Things You'll Learn:How blame can lead to disengagement and toxicity in the workplaceSome strategies on how to address blame constructivelyWhy blame is a universal issueHow to overcome the fear of failureThe three P's that create a blame death spiral and how to avoid them Dustin's Site: https://thepeoplebrand.com/Dustin's Book: https://a.co/d/62P59Tu The opening track is titled "Money Trees" by the magnanimous chill-hop master, Marcus D (@marcusd). Be sure to visit his site and support his craft. https://marcusd.net/Please support today's podcast to keep this content coming! CashApp: $DomBrightmonDonate on PayPal: @DBrightmonBuy Me a Coffee: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/dombrightmonGet Going North T-Shirts, Stickers, and More: https://www.teepublic.com/stores/dom-brightmon You Might Also Like… Ep. 764 – The 5 Languages of Appreciation in the Workplace with Dr. Paul White (@drpaulwhite): https://www.goingnorthpodcast.com/ep-764-the-5-languages-of-appreciation-in-the-workplace-with-dr-paul-white-drpaulwhite/ Ep. 571 – “A Powerful Culture Starts with You” with Dr. Shahrzad Nooravi (@shahrzadnooravi): https://www.goingnorthpodcast.com/ep-571-a-powerful-culture-starts-with-you-with-dr-shahrzad-nooravi-shahrzadnooravi/ Ep. 470.5 – “Business and Personal Secrets for Avoiding Relationship Landmines” with Frank Zaccari (@FZaccari): https://www.goingnorthpodcast.com/ep-4705-business-and-personal-secrets-for-avoiding-relationship-landmines-with-frank-zaccari-fzaccari/ Ep. 412 – “Why Boomer, Xer, Millennial and Gen Z Labels Need Reimagined” with Dr. Rick Chromey (@MyGenTech2020): https://www.goingnorthpodcast.com/ep-412-why-boomer-xer-millennial-and-gen-z-labels-need-reimagined-with-dr-rick-chromey-mygentech2020/ Ep. 438 – “Acoustic Leadership” with Rick Lozano, CSP (@rick_lozano): https://www.goingnorthpodcast.com/ep-438-acoustic-leadership-with-rick-lozano-csp-rick_lozano/ Ep. 768 – How You Can Become a Valuable Leader with Velma Knowles: https://www.goingnorthpodcast.com/ep-768-how-can-you-become-a-valuable-leader-with-velma-knowles/ 286 – “Leading Beyond A Crisis” with Ben Baker & Claire Chandler (@YourBrandMrktng): https://www.goingnorthpodcast.com/286-leading-beyond-a-crisis-with-ben-baker-claire-chandler-yourbrandmrktng/ 136 - "Leadership Development" with Kevin Wayne Johnson (@Writing4theLord): https://www.goingnorthpodcast.com/136-leadership-development-with-kevin-wayne-johnson-writing4thelord/ Ep. 685 – “How Inclusive Leaders Keep Their Employees Engaged & Productive” with Dea Irby (@deairby): https://www.goingnorthpodcast.com/ep-685-how-inclusive-leaders-keep-their-employees-engaged-productive-with-dea-irby-deairby/

When outsourced manufacturing processes such as milling are brought back in-house due to the uncertainty of supply chains, up-to-date engineering skills and fresh know how are often required. The general trend to increase productivity and improve profitability may be timeless. However, when it comes to current trends, it is easy to lose sight of the big picture. The selection and use of the right tools and tool holders are critical as they determine the quality and efficiency of the end result. So, wouldn't it make more sense to consult a cutting tool manufacturer? If the crises of the past few years have made one thing clear, it is how fragile our supply chains are and how quickly they can be disrupted. The result is that business is done by those who can deliver. Manufacturers and production companies are therefore bringing back in-house manufacturing processes that they outsourced overseas years ago for cost reasons. The trend has been evident for some time. However, a problem arises if the knowledge and expertise have also migrated with the processes. Bringing back manufacturing processes In general, the successful machining of steel and, in particular, the precise and efficient milling of steel are impacted by a multitude of factors and their complexity can quickly become overwhelming. Tool manufacturers who can think in terms of the application are therefore a necessity – especially when they are also willing to provide advice on complex production processes. The Swabian medium-sized company of Karl-Heinz Arnold GmbH with its brand name of ARNO Werkzeuge is known for its first-class turning and parting-off tools. It has been a constant player in these processes for many years. What is less well known is that the family-run company also develops innovative milling tools that are manufactured in Germany. “With a high level of vertical integration, our development expertise and global sales structures, we manufacture high-performance milling tools that are deployed worldwide for efficient milling,” says ARNO marketing team leader Christian Kimmich. Support often incorporates systems such as a tool holder for corner milling and HFC indexable inserts, a multi-functional system for HFC and corner milling, a face milling system and solid carbide cutters. In particular, a new system for face milling has been introduced and it incorporates a recent new development. “One trend among users is towards smaller machining allowances for workpieces that run faster and at higher feed rates,” says Marco Staiger, Application Engineer at ARNO Werkzeuge. This is precisely why ARNO has developed the new, stable FT face milling system 09, a system that focuses on the application. The FT system is very stable and features a smooth cut and very quiet running. This provides the spindle with maximum protection and is the result of a large flat face on the holders, a positive rake angle despite the negative mounting position and a differential pitch of the flutes. More teeth and smaller double-sided indexable inserts The new FT 09 milling system consists of two variants of stable tool holders covering a diameter range of 20 to 125mm and it is equipped with eight flutes and matching smaller indexable inserts. The differential pitch of the tool holders ensures a quiet and low-vibration milling process. Especially with small allowances, ARNO promises a higher chip removal rate due to the higher feed rates. “Since we managed to achieve a narrower pitch in the tool holder, even though it has a small diameter, we can now place more teeth on the tool,” Staiger explains. This means that up to nine indexable inserts can be fitted, where only six were possible before. Despite the narrower dimensions, users do not have to dispense with cooling. Staiger adds: “Through the internal channels for cooling media, cooling lubricant or air for dry machining are fed directly to the cutting zone and ensure significantly longer tool life and optimum chip removal.” A particularly convincing feature is the optimal utilisation of the flute with smaller in-feeds up to a maximum of four millimetres. This means users no longer need to discard half-used indexable inserts. The large pool of applications demonstrate engineering competence Those who do not want to opt for ‘fast' or ‘fine' machining are best advised to use Arno's FD milling system. The nickel-plated long-life basic holders for corner milling and the HFC indexable inserts with four efficient cutting edges per insert can combine to achieve a high feed rate. These tool holders also have a differential pitch that reduces vibration and results in smooth surfaces. The system ensures a long service life and is easy to handle. Most users set their machining priorities with indexable inserts in sizes 10 and 15. The smaller insert achieves high surface finish credit to its large wiper geometry. By contrast, the 15mm inserts are ideal for roughing since they are extremely stable. ARNO offers different geometries and grades to flexibly adapt machining to the application in question. This is precisely where ARNO excels. It draws on the experience gained from a huge pool of applications and can advise on the most suitable tooling system for each case. The precision-manufactured positive chip breakers on the indexable inserts ensure a soft cut. Since they are also peripherally ground and polished, the PMA geometry can cut both aluminium and non-ferrous metals. With solid carbide cutters, ARNO also has tools in its portfolio that achieve optimum production processes with reduced downtimes thanks to fewer tool changes. The solid carbide metal cutters are made of an extremely fine grain carbide grade between 0.1 and 0.5µm. The consistent material properties are impressive and depending on the design, they are TiAIN, TiCN or AlCrN coated. ARNO's FE milling system is an alternative to solid carbide metal cutters. Manufacturers can opt for efficient shoulders or high speed during HFC milling. “In both cases, users benefit from high feed rates, extremely smooth running and excellent cutting ability,” promises Staiger. This is due to the highly positive mounting position of the indexable inserts and the spiral shape of the flutes, ensuring smooth material cutting. It is also an ideal situation if the tool supplier can adapt to the needs of its customers with special product lines. With the Basic Series, ARNO Werkzeuge offers efficient, rock-solid tools with many grades and geometries that are suitable for a wide range of machining tasks. On the other hand, the tools in the ‘Major' series are used when surfaces need to be outstanding. Every minute counts when it comes to tool life and difficult-to-machine materials or large production runs. The tools can be individually adapted with a selection of coatings or tool holders. Conclusion: Milling tools benefit from turning experience With its carefully designed and well-engineered milling tools, ARNO Werkzeuge has no reason to hide its light under a bushel. This is because it also benefits from the turning and parting-off expertise as well as from its application experience. We were impressed by how the milling systems are precisely developed for different applications and yet offer the greatest possible flexibility. With its extensive portfolio, ARNO serves the trends in milling.

Episode SummaryIn this illuminating episode of the Sales Leadership Show, we talk to Dustin Staiger, author of "Blame This Book," about rescuing workplace culture from the toxic cycles of scapegoating and blame. We dive deep into the history, psychology, and practical solutions around creating a culture of accountability and psychological safety. If you're a leader looking to improve team performance and workplace morale, this episode is a must-listen!Episode TimelineDon't Burn Any Bridges (0:03)Key Insight: The importance of maintaining professional relationships and avoiding scapegoating in your work environment.The History of Scapegoating and Workplace Toxicity (2:48)Ancient cultures and the concept of a scapegoat.Biblical narrative: The story of Moses and the Israelites.Why is the Book Called "Blame This Book"? (5:22)Dustin's book serves as a stopgap solution; it's not the be-all-end-all.The power and danger of symbolizing blame in an organization.How to Overcome the Fear of Failure (6:51)Common thread in Dustin's work: Facing fear.How to overcome both the fear and the fear of failure.The Difference Between Blame and Responsibility (8:23)Creating a culture of acceptable failure and learning.Clarifying the difference between blame, responsibility, and accountability.Fact-Based Opinion: 94% of performance variance is due to systems and processes, not individual incompetence.The Power of Ownership and Clarity (14:00)The immense benefits of clarity in organizational culture.Resentment: A toxic element that has long-lasting negative impacts.Roadblocks to Having a Blameless Culture (16:46)Internal and external roadblocks that hinder a blameless culture.Reference to the biblical story of Adam and Eve consuming the forbidden fruit.Why We Tend to Blame Others (18:37)The psychology behind the fear of vulnerability.Real-world example: The story of Twilio, a company that successfully managed to tackle blame culture.Creating Psychological Safety in Your Organization (20:36)Steps to build a culture of psychological safety.Book recommendation: "Creative Confidence" by the Kelly brothers.How to Get Rid of Blame (22:24)Practical steps to remove blame and resentment from the workplace.Case Study: Amanda Knox as an example of a perfect scapegoat, exposing confirmation bias in human psychology.Recognizing the tendency to blame others as a way to relieve pressure.Key TakeawaysAccountability over Blame: Encourage a culture where people take responsibility for their actions rather than projecting blame.Face Your Fears: A significant aspect of leadership is leading by example, including the ability to overcome fears and insecurities.Psychological Safety: Creating a safe space for team members to express themselves is crucial for both innovation and productivity.Systemic Factors: Understand that most performance issues are systemic; individual performance is often a symptom, not the disease.Clarity Is King: Clearly defined roles, expectations, and feedback mechanisms can significantly reduce workplace toxicity.Get a copy of Blame This Book by Dustin Staiger ★ Support this podcast ★ This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit happyaf.substack.com/subscribe

Our guest holds the title of singer, dancer, performer, choreographer, teacher and Owner of Overture Musical Theatre Training.  She has been called Maria, Mrs. Potts, Mrs. Lovett but mostly Kara.  If you've seen a musical or play in Oklahoma, then most likely you've seen Kara in some form beautifully portraying a character in a story.  Today we have the privilege of hearing her own beautiful story.   

We're back, and Ernst Lubitsch is now in Hollywood! It's been an exciting time for the podcast: we've traveled around the world or, more specifically, to Los Angeles and New York City, to record the next few seasons. We begin at the Margaret Herrick Library at Beverly Hills, in conversation with Peter Labuza as we discuss the history of early Hollywood, wherein Ernst Lubitsch is about to begin the second phase of his career. In this episode, we cover the landscape and economics of the studio system circa the 1920s, 1930s, and 1940s including studios such as MGM, 20th Century, Universal, Paramount, and RKO, the interplay between capital and labor in this industry, the impact of synchronized sound, the great depression, the Hays code, JEWEL ROBBERY, and much more! Anna Citak-Scott was our recording engineer for this episode. Thanks to Matt Severson and the Margaret Herrick Library for letting us record in the Karl Malden room. We have a Discord! NEXT WEEK: Critic and friend of the show Tim Brayton returns to discuss Lubitsch's first American silent film, ROSITA. For details as to where to find this film, check out our resources page. WORKS CITED: Hard, Fast, and Brokerage: Irving H. Levin, the Filmmakers, and the Birth of Conglomerate in Hollywood by Peter Labuza For The Maintenance of the System: Institutional and Cultural Change within the Motion Picture Producers and Distributors of America, 1922-1945 by Paul MacLusky Moticone The Classical Hollywood Cinema: Film Style and Mode of Production to 1960 by Bordwell, Thompson, and Staiger. Making Cinelandia: American Films and Mexican Film Culture by Laura Isabel Serna An Empire of Their Own by Niel Gabler Film Rhythm after Sound by Lea Jacobs Working in Hollywood by Ronnie Regev YOU MUST REMEMBER THIS: KAY FRANCIS

Die Spatzen pfiffen es schon lange von den Dächern, Junior Adamu ist Freiburger. Patrick und Nik sprachen über Stärken und Schwächen des jungen Österreichers und darüber welche Kaderrolle er am wahrscheinlichsten ausfüllen wird. Außerdem Thema: eine Einordnung des anstehenden Jeong-Abgangs nach Stuttgart. Lust mitzumachen? Feedback? Spenden? Sehr gerne! Kontaktiere uns jederzeit via Social Media oder Mail. Mehr Infos auf https://www.spodcast-freiburg.de Eine Spende für ein Bier, ein Käffchen oder einfach gute Laune beim Spodcast-Team könnt ihr unter folgendem Link geben: https://paypal.me/AlexanderKoneczny Das SC Freiburg Tippspiel 22/23: https://www.kicktipp.de/spodcast Euer Spodcast Team in dieser Folge: Patrick (@prsc1904) und Nik (Nik_Staiger)

Jo Fellas! Nachdem ich momentan viele alten Deutschrap-Sachen höre und mich mit u.a. Optik Rec. auseinandersetze, dachte ich, dass wir die heutige Folge dazu nutzen, uns mit der Historie eines nicht ganz unwichtigen Künstlers zu beschäftigen. Wie Eko Fresh in jungen Jahren von Mönchengladbach zu Kool Savas nach Berlin kam, wie die beiden sich zerstritten, und wie Eko's Anteil in der Causa Bushido & Kay One aussah; das und noch viel mehr in der neuen Folge "Rap gehört zum guten Ton". Startet gut in die Woche und seid lieb zueinander!

In today's episode, I speak with Dustin Staiger, author of Blame This Book. Click here to learn more about Dustin and the difference he makes. Creative on Purpose is a show about defining, developing, and delivering the difference only you can make. I'm your host, Scott Perry, encore life coach, author of The Art of Encore Living, and Chief Difference-Maker at Creative on Purpose. Ready to play your game all in and full out? Visit CreativeOnPurpose.com to get started now!

This week we have a mystery fish from Australia, the ompax! Main source consulted: Whitley, G. P. (1933). Ompax spatuloides Castelnau, a Mythical Australian Fish. The American Naturalist, 67(713), 563–567. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2456813 The fateful Ompax drawing: The freshwater longtom (picture by Barry Hutchins): Show transcript: Welcome to Strange Animals Podcast. I'm your host, Kate Shaw. For the Patreon episode this month, we had a bird mystery from Queensland, Australia. While I was researching it I came across this mystery fish, also from Queensland. In 1872, a man named Karl Staiger visited the town of Gayndah as part of his job. He was a chemist, but he also had an interest in nature and years later he worked for the Queensland Museum. One morning in Gayndah he went to breakfast and was served a strange-looking fish—so strange-looking that he asked what it was. He was told it was a very rare fish found in the nearby Burnett River. Staiger was interested enough that he asked the road inspector, presumably one of his coworkers, to draw the fish for him. But the drawing wasn't made until after Staiger ate the fish. It was his breakfast and he was hungry and, as he wrote later, he didn't know he should have at least saved the head for study. Presumably he also didn't want his breakfast to get cold while the drawing was being made. The road inspector was a careful artist although he wasn't a naturalist himself, so he did what he could to draw the fish accurately from the remains of Staiger's meal. According to the drawing, the fish had a long, flattened rostrum that looked a little like a very long, thin duckbill, big scales on its body, and a fin that went all the way around the edges of the tail starting about halfway down the back, which appeared to be connected dorsal, caudal, and ventral fins. Its pectoral fins were small, and its eyes were also small and near the top of its head. The fish was brown in color and about 18 inches long, or 46 cm. Staiger eventually wrote to a French naturalist and sent him the drawing. The French naturalist has about 500 names and titles, usually shortened to something like Francis de Laporte de Castelnau. I'm going to call him Francis because obviously I can't pronounce any of those names properly. Francis saw at a glance that the fish was unlike anything he'd ever seen before. He suspected it didn't just deserve its own genus but its own family. Staiger had reported what he'd been told, that the fish was known from a particular part of the Burnett River, and he'd also mentioned that it lived in the same area as another strange fish, the Australian lungfish. The Australian lungfish had only been described a few years before, in 1870, and it's a very big fish. It can grow up to 5 feet long, or 1.5 meters, and is greenish in color. It has big overlapping scales on its body and four strong fins that look more like flippers than ordinary fish fins, which it uses to stand and walk on the bottom of the river. Its tail comes to a single rounded point and it has tooth plates instead of regular teeth, which it uses to crush the small animals it eats. It also has a single lung in addition to gills, and like other lungfish it comes to the surface every so often to replace the air in its lung. When it's especially active it will breathe at the surface more often. The ability to breathe air allows it to survive in water with low oxygen. Francis noted that there were some similarities between the new fish and the Australian lungfish, but he thought it was more likely to be related to the alligator gar of North America. It had the same type of scales as the alligator gar. He also noted that its duckbill rostrum resembled the rostrum of the American paddlefish, which is similarly shaped but even longer than the new fish's, but that the rest of the new fish was very different from the paddlefish. Francis described the new fish in 1879 and gave ...

Denial. We've all heard that somewhat childish joke. You the one  - about how ‘it's not just a river in Egypt'. Yet, when it comes to why we blame others, we often find ourselves swimming in a river of it.  And when things truly fall apart, and our ability to navigate conflict floats south… Sometimes, as things go wrong, we're often quick to point fingers. And We frequently find ourselves deflecting responsibility; offering, instead - tons of denial. When it comes to blame, many theories exist as to just why we do it. Yet, seldom does blaming others, or even ourselves - come without consequences.    In this episode of "The Light Inside," ⁠author Dustin Staiger⁠ discusses his book ⁠"Blame This Book:⁠ Rescue Your Workplace Culture From Toxicity and Scapegoating" Host Jeffrey Besecker and Dustin discuss the cultural phenomena of blaming and why it matters. Dustin explains that his research on creativity and innovation in the workplace led him to the conclusion that fear of blame is what often keeps individuals and teams from taking risks and reaching their potential. The conversation touches on how blame is a cultural phenomenon and how it affects personal and professional relationships.   Dustin and Jeffrey explore the topic of fear of failure, identifying it as a significant factor that can hinder individuals and organizations from reaching their creative potential. Staiger suggests doing a blameless pre-mortem to identify potential issues before taking on a challenging task.   By doing this, we can turn around from a "death spiral" of biased and filtered thinking and project healthier outcomes for ourselves. The importance of naming and identifying core emotions is also discussed as a helpful tool in navigating difficult situations. The episode emphasizes the importance of recognizing and addressing biased perceptions and filtered emotions in order to surrender ‘faultfinding' and achieve healthier outcomes.    However, the guest also notes that some highly creative and innovative organizations are able to shift our relationship to this fear of failure by creating an environment of psychological safety. This allows individuals to emotionally regulate and take risks without fear of blame or adverse consequences.    Overall, the episode suggests that overcoming the fear of failure is crucial for individuals and organizations to reach their creative potential and achieve success.   Key Discussion Topics:   The Power of Naming and Owning Our Emotions Breaking Free from Blame: Taking Responsibility for Our Actions The Three P's of Failure: How to Avoid the Death Spiral The Physical Manifestations of Suppressed Emotions Shifting from Deflecting Patterns to Healthy Coping Strategies   Today look at BLAME with author Dustin Staiger, and why we frequently deflect our sense of responsibility in order to avoid our emotional interactions. Tune in to find out how on this episode of To The Light Inside. JOIN US ON INSTAGRAM: @thelightinsidepodcast SUBSCRIBE: pod.link/thelightinside   Featured Guests: Dustin Staiger Credits:  Music Score by Epidemic Sound Executive Producer: Jeffrey Besecker Mixing, Engineering, Production, and Mastering: Aloft Media Studio Senior Program Director: Anna Getz --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thelightinside/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thelightinside/support

Aujourd'hui dans ce nouvel épisode de notre série sur les spiritueux

Über ein Jahr ist seit "Clanland" vergangen. Jetzt sprechen die Hosts Mohamed Chahrour und Marcus Staiger mit radioeins-Moderatorin Silke Super über ihr Buch "Dakhil - Inside arabische Clans". Warum das Buch der "große Bruder" vom Podcast sein soll und wie es sich von "Clanland" unterscheidet, hört ihr hier.

Nik, Alex und Julian besprachen für euch in gewohnter (Über-)Länge den 0:2 Auswärtssieg gegen Schalke 04 und warfen einen Blick voraus auf das Spiel gegen Qarabag. Danke an Nik für den Support! Wir sprachen über folgende Themen: – der Gegner: FC Schalke 04 – die SC-Aufstellung & Taktik – detaillierte Highlights – Einzelkritik SC-Spieler – Statistik, Schiedsrichter, Sonstiges – Bundesliga 12. Spieltag – die anderen Spiele – Unsere Leihspieler – Frauen, 2. Mannschaft und die U19 – Ausblick auf das nächste Spiel gegen Qarabag – Beitrag des SWR/ARD über sexuelle Übergriffe und Gewalt im Stadion. Den Beitrag des SWR von Charlotte Schönberger (@Ch_Schoenberger) dazu findet ihr hier: https://www.ardmediathek.de/video/Y3JpZDovL3N3ci5kZS9hZXgvbzE3NTA5Njc Lust mitzumachen? Feedback? Spenden? Sehr gerne! Kontaktiere uns jederzeit via Social Media oder Mail. Mehr Infos auf www.spodcast-freiburg.de Eine Spende für ein Bier, ein Käffchen oder einfach gute Laune beim Spodcast-Team könnt ihr unter folgendem Link geben: https://paypal.me/AlexanderKoneczny Das SC Freiburg Tippspiel 22/23: www.kicktipp.de/spodcast Euer Spodcast Team in dieser Folge: Alex (@AKoneczny) Julian (@nokraut) Nik (@Nik_Staiger)

My guest this week on the podcast is Phillip Levine, the Katharine Coman and A. Barton Hepburn Professor of Economics at Wellesley College in Massachusetts. I've only personally met Phil once — at a conference on the family many years ago and just briefly. But I have been a huge admirer of him for many reasons for a long time, ever since graduate school, and I wanted to interview him for a lot of reasons. First, he attended Princeton in the 1980s at that heady time when Orley, Card, Krueger, Angrist and so many others were there. The birth place of the credibility revolution is arguably the Princeton's Industrial Relations Section where a shift in empirical labor took place that eventually ran through the entire profession and placed it on a new equilibrium. Phil was there, colleagues and students with those people, and himself part of that “first generation” of labor economists who thought that way and did work that way and I wanted to hear about his life and how it passed through, like a river bending and turning, the Firestone library and beyond. Scott's Substack is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.But I also have a special interest in Phil. I actually first learned difference-in-differences from a book that Phil wrote on abortion policy entitled Sex and Consequences (Princeton University Press). I graduated from the University of Georgia in 2007, but the job market had started in 2006, and around the spring when I had accepted my job at Baylor, I was finishing my dissertation. I had one chapter left and it was going to be an extension of Donohue and Levitt's abortion-crime hypothesis to the study of gonorrhea. My reasoning was that if abortion legalization had so dramatically changed a cohort by selecting on individuals who would have grown up to commit crimes, then it should show up in other areas too. My argument was relatively straightforward and I'll just quote it here from the article I later published with Chris Cornwell in the 2012 American Law and Economics Review.“The characteristics of the marginal (unborn) child could explain risky sexual behavior that leads to disease transmission. For example, Gruber et al. (1999) show that the child who would have been born had abortion remained outlawed was 60% more likely to live in a single-parent household. Being raised by a single parent is a strong predictor of earlier sexual activity and unprotected sex, evidenced by the higher rates of teenage pregnancy among the poor.”It's funny the order in which things go. I think I somewhat understood what I was doing because I already had planned to do my study before reading Phil's book. I was going to use the early repeal of abortion in 1969/1970 in five states (California and New York being two of them) followed by the 1973 Roe v. Wade as this staggered natural experiment to see whether abortion legalization led to a drop in gonorrhea a generation later. I had adapted a graph I'd seen by Bill Evans to illustrate how the staggering of the roll out would lead a visual “wave” of declines in gonorrhea in the repeal stages among an emerging cohort that would last briefly until the Roe cohort entered. Visually, I believed you should see a drop in gonorrhea for 15yo starting in 1986 that would get deeper until 1988, flatten, and then disappear completely by 1992. The design for this idea came from a paper I just linked to above — by Phil Levine. It was entitled “Abortion Legalization and Child Living Circumstances: Who is the “Marginal Child”?” coauthored with Doug Staiger and Jon Gruber, published in the 1999 QJE. It came out two years before Donohue and Levitt's 2001 QJE on abortion and crime and arguably really set the stage for that paper. The two papers are very different — Phil, Staiger and Gruber are looking at who was aborted using instrumental variables with the five “repeal states” as the instrument. The abstract is worth reading:“Cohorts born after legalized abortion experienced a significant reduction in a number of adverse outcomes. We find that the marginal child would have been 40–60 percent more likely to live in a single-parent family, to live in poverty, to receive welfare, and to die as an infant.” They used, in other words, instrumental variables whereas Donohue and Levitt used a lagged abortion ratio measure, if I recall correctly. Phil's paper really struck me as the more credible design at that time because the staggering of legalization gave such precise predictions — something about the timing, something about the location. It just really haunted me for a long time.Well, while I was preparing for that project, reading the literature on the economics of abortion, continuing my ongoing interest in the economics of sexual behavior, Phil has a chapter where he sets up for the reader a table explaining something called “difference-in-differences”. While econometrics was my field, I couldn't recall hearing what that was, because it wasn't really best I could tell an estimator. Rather it was what we now call a research design. I don't have the book here at the house, but the table made a huge impression on me because if you just walk through the before and after differencing, even without potential outcomes, you can see with your own eyes exactly why difference-in-differences identifies a causal effect. I have a version of the table in my book, which I'll produce below.Once I saw that, it was easy to understand triple differences — a design that many people find very confusing if they only think of it in terms of regression equations. Almost immediately after I understood Phil's DiD table, I adapted it to my repeal versus Roe context and imagined “Well, what if there were other things happening in these repeal states later? Is there an untreated group I could imagine was affected by those unseen things but which wasn't treated?” And I thought “Let me use a slightly older group of individuals in the same states as the within-state controls”. That approach — the triple difference — can be seen below in a table I mocked up for a lecture in which I teach triple difference using Guber's 1994 paper that introduced the design for the first time. And so I wrote the chapter, and of all my chapters, it was the only one I ever published. Thank you for reading Scott's Substack. This post is public so feel free to share it.Where am I going with this? I guess what I'm saying is that as luck would have it, I made a monumental jump in my understanding of this “way of thinking” about doing empirical work from a single table in a short little book on abortion policy by Phil Levine. That one table so completely captivated my mind that ever since I have only wanted to learn more about causal inference in fact. As odd as it may sound, something about difference-in-differences really unlocked for me what the whole empirical enterprise was about. As Imbens said, there is something about potential outcomes that just makes crystal clear what we mean by causality, and many of the research designs that have over time been fully mapped onto potential outcomes — difference-in-differences being one — extend that clarity for a lot of us. Phil's work has consistently been part of the broader education of labor economists about what the Princeton tradition left us — make clear where the variation in the data is coming from, make clear who is and is not functioning as the counterfactual, “clean identification”, carefully collected data, on questions that matter.Phil has had a very interesting life; I caught only a peek of it from this interview. He opened up and shared about being a young man growing up middle class where family experiences during difficult economic times appeared to cause inside him an interest in labor. He gravitated towards law but a chance research class in college placed him on a new trajectory. His professors encouraged him to go to Princeton because, to put it bluntly, that was in their opinion where the best labor economics was at the moment. So he did. He alluded to graduate school being very hard — something many of us can identify with — but he survived, graduated, and took a job at Wellesley College where he's been ever since. We discussed his interest in topics in labor economics, his emerging interest in abortion policy, his coauthorships with several people he calls close friends, and his favorite project of all time — a 2019 AEJ: Applied study with Melissa Kearney, a longtime collaborator, on the effect of Sesame Street on educational outcomes, finding strong effects for boys. We also discussed the nonprofit he founded called MyInTuition which is an online calculator that shows the projected cost of college once financial aid is factored in. This topic around the opaque pricing of higher education is something Phil cares deeply about and has a new book on the topic too. All in all, Phil is an exemplary labor economist and someone I admire greatly. Not just for his careful empirical style and approach, but also because as you can see throughout his life a deep care for people. I have a deep admiration for the labor economists. Most of us are after all workers. We buy the things we need to survive using money we earned from work. Throughout human history, we have lived at the break even condition of survival, many of us not having enough calories to even make it through the day. The researchers who study work, be it economists or not, are studying poverty, one of the most dangerous plagues that has ever been around, far more dangerous than Covid or the plague. In Phil I see someone whose entire life has been about trying to better understand the causes of the wealth of nations, to quote Adam Smith, be it his early work on unemployment insurance, or his later work on children's television shows. It was a pleasure to talk to him and I hope you enjoy this interview as much as me. Forgive me for this rambling essay. If you enjoy the podcasts and the substack more generally, please consider supporting it by becoming a subscriber! Scott's Substack is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Get full access to Scott's Substack at causalinf.substack.com/subscribe

My guest this week on the podcast is Phillip Levine, the Katharine Coman and A. Barton Hepburn Professor of Economics at Wellesley College in Massachusetts. I've only personally met Phil once — at a conference on the family many years ago and just briefly. But I have been a huge admirer of him for many reasons for a long time, ever since graduate school, and I wanted to interview him for a lot of reasons. First, he attended Princeton in the 1980s at that heady time when Orley, Card, Krueger, Angrist and so many others were there. The birth place of the credibility revolution is arguably the Princeton's Industrial Relations Section where a shift in empirical labor took place that eventually ran through the entire profession and placed it on a new equilibrium. Phil was there, colleagues and students with those people, and himself part of that “first generation” of labor economists who thought that way and did work that way and I wanted to hear about his life and how it passed through, like a river bending and turning, the Firestone library and beyond. Scott's Substack is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.But I also have a special interest in Phil. I actually first learned difference-in-differences from a book that Phil wrote on abortion policy entitled Sex and Consequences (Princeton University Press). I graduated from the University of Georgia in 2007, but the job market had started in 2006, and around the spring when I had accepted my job at Baylor, I was finishing my dissertation. I had one chapter left and it was going to be an extension of Donohue and Levitt's abortion-crime hypothesis to the study of gonorrhea. My reasoning was that if abortion legalization had so dramatically changed a cohort by selecting on individuals who would have grown up to commit crimes, then it should show up in other areas too. My argument was relatively straightforward and I'll just quote it here from the article I later published with Chris Cornwell in the 2012 American Law and Economics Review.“The characteristics of the marginal (unborn) child could explain risky sexual behavior that leads to disease transmission. For example, Gruber et al. (1999) show that the child who would have been born had abortion remained outlawed was 60% more likely to live in a single-parent household. Being raised by a single parent is a strong predictor of earlier sexual activity and unprotected sex, evidenced by the higher rates of teenage pregnancy among the poor.”It's funny the order in which things go. I think I somewhat understood what I was doing because I already had planned to do my study before reading Phil's book. I was going to use the early repeal of abortion in 1969/1970 in five states (California and New York being two of them) followed by the 1973 Roe v. Wade as this staggered natural experiment to see whether abortion legalization led to a drop in gonorrhea a generation later. I had adapted a graph I'd seen by Bill Evans to illustrate how the staggering of the roll out would lead a visual “wave” of declines in gonorrhea in the repeal stages among an emerging cohort that would last briefly until the Roe cohort entered. Visually, I believed you should see a drop in gonorrhea for 15yo starting in 1986 that would get deeper until 1988, flatten, and then disappear completely by 1992. The design for this idea came from a paper I just linked to above — by Phil Levine. It was entitled “Abortion Legalization and Child Living Circumstances: Who is the “Marginal Child”?” coauthored with Doug Staiger and Jon Gruber, published in the 1999 QJE. It came out two years before Donohue and Levitt's 2001 QJE on abortion and crime and arguably really set the stage for that paper. The two papers are very different — Phil, Staiger and Gruber are looking at who was aborted using instrumental variables with the five “repeal states” as the instrument. The abstract is worth reading:“Cohorts born after legalized abortion experienced a significant reduction in a number of adverse outcomes. We find that the marginal child would have been 40–60 percent more likely to live in a single-parent family, to live in poverty, to receive welfare, and to die as an infant.” They used, in other words, instrumental variables whereas Donohue and Levitt used a lagged abortion ratio measure, if I recall correctly. Phil's paper really struck me as the more credible design at that time because the staggering of legalization gave such precise predictions — something about the timing, something about the location. It just really haunted me for a long time.Well, while I was preparing for that project, reading the literature on the economics of abortion, continuing my ongoing interest in the economics of sexual behavior, Phil has a chapter where he sets up for the reader a table explaining something called “difference-in-differences”. While econometrics was my field, I couldn't recall hearing what that was, because it wasn't really best I could tell an estimator. Rather it was what we now call a research design. I don't have the book here at the house, but the table made a huge impression on me because if you just walk through the before and after differencing, even without potential outcomes, you can see with your own eyes exactly why difference-in-differences identifies a causal effect. I have a version of the table in my book, which I'll produce below.Once I saw that, it was easy to understand triple differences — a design that many people find very confusing if they only think of it in terms of regression equations. Almost immediately after I understood Phil's DiD table, I adapted it to my repeal versus Roe context and imagined “Well, what if there were other things happening in these repeal states later? Is there an untreated group I could imagine was affected by those unseen things but which wasn't treated?” And I thought “Let me use a slightly older group of individuals in the same states as the within-state controls”. That approach — the triple difference — can be seen below in a table I mocked up for a lecture in which I teach triple difference using Guber's 1994 paper that introduced the design for the first time. And so I wrote the chapter, and of all my chapters, it was the only one I ever published. Thank you for reading Scott's Substack. This post is public so feel free to share it.Where am I going with this? I guess what I'm saying is that as luck would have it, I made a monumental jump in my understanding of this “way of thinking” about doing empirical work from a single table in a short little book on abortion policy by Phil Levine. That one table so completely captivated my mind that ever since I have only wanted to learn more about causal inference in fact. As odd as it may sound, something about difference-in-differences really unlocked for me what the whole empirical enterprise was about. As Imbens said, there is something about potential outcomes that just makes crystal clear what we mean by causality, and many of the research designs that have over time been fully mapped onto potential outcomes — difference-in-differences being one — extend that clarity for a lot of us. Phil's work has consistently been part of the broader education of labor economists about what the Princeton tradition left us — make clear where the variation in the data is coming from, make clear who is and is not functioning as the counterfactual, “clean identification”, carefully collected data, on questions that matter.Phil has had a very interesting life; I caught only a peek of it from this interview. He opened up and shared about being a young man growing up middle class where family experiences during difficult economic times appeared to cause inside him an interest in labor. He gravitated towards law but a chance research class in college placed him on a new trajectory. His professors encouraged him to go to Princeton because, to put it bluntly, that was in their opinion where the best labor economics was at the moment. So he did. He alluded to graduate school being very hard — something many of us can identify with — but he survived, graduated, and took a job at Wellesley College where he's been ever since. We discussed his interest in topics in labor economics, his emerging interest in abortion policy, his coauthorships with several people he calls close friends, and his favorite project of all time — a 2019 AEJ: Applied study with Melissa Kearney, a longtime collaborator, on the effect of Sesame Street on educational outcomes, finding strong effects for boys. We also discussed the nonprofit he founded called MyInTuition which is an online calculator that shows the projected cost of college once financial aid is factored in. This topic around the opaque pricing of higher education is something Phil cares deeply about and has a new book on the topic too. All in all, Phil is an exemplary labor economist and someone I admire greatly. Not just for his careful empirical style and approach, but also because as you can see throughout his life a deep care for people. I have a deep admiration for the labor economists. Most of us are after all workers. We buy the things we need to survive using money we earned from work. Throughout human history, we have lived at the break even condition of survival, many of us not having enough calories to even make it through the day. The researchers who study work, be it economists or not, are studying poverty, one of the most dangerous plagues that has ever been around, far more dangerous than Covid or the plague. In Phil I see someone whose entire life has been about trying to better understand the causes of the wealth of nations, to quote Adam Smith, be it his early work on unemployment insurance, or his later work on children's television shows. It was a pleasure to talk to him and I hope you enjoy this interview as much as me. Forgive me for this rambling essay. If you enjoy the podcasts and the substack more generally, please consider supporting it by becoming a subscriber! Scott's Substack is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Get full access to Scott's Substack at causalinf.substack.com/subscribe

Two frontline police officers talk about knowing you're pregnant and when might be the best time to notify the employer to ensure a safe work environment for yourself and your child.  Both Chloe Staiger and Jaclyn Flaten share their experiences relating to the Collective Agreement benefits and some of the challenges others might face when becoming a mom on Patrol.The Victoria City Police Union is committed to enhancing the Maternity/Paternity benefit package in the Collective Agreement and working with the employer to ensure VicPD is a preferred employer for those wanting to be parents.Jaclyn reveals the name of her unborn daughter on this podcast, and we wish her all the best on her maternity leave.  Chloe is returning to frontline policing as this episode is launched and we wish her safe shifts.Sound editing done by Todd Mason.More about the Victoria City Police Union (VCPU): - Tweet us at https://twitter.com/VicPD_Union - Follow us on Instagram at https://www.instagram.com/vicpd_union/ - Find us on FaceBook at https://www.facebook.com/truebluevictoria/ - Visit our website for information at https://truebluevic.ca/ - Email us at media@vcpu.ca for any media inquiries or requests to be on the True Blue Podcast

Given the recent reversal of Roe v. Wade, honest insight into and support for modern-day parents or child caregiving are more necessary than ever. Although recorded weeks before the ruling, this conversation seems incredibly prescient.  Allison Staiger, LCSW, is spiraling. “Have you heard of that term before? Spiral-linear?” she asks. I hadn't but given her definition, it's a concept I'm down with. “It's where you're still moving forward but there's lots of cycles and you kind of cycle back. Things die and then are reborn.”  Makes sense given Allison's current physical and emotional “birthing” process. She's deep in the process of relocating her life and fierce feminist care practice from Metairie, LA, to Chicago. Highwire Therapy supports new, expectant, hopeful, and grieving parents, helping them process perinatal mood and anxiety disorders, loss, birth trauma, caregiver burnout, infertility, and the general OMFG of becoming a parent.  The Matriarchy, her nascent coaching practice, is a shame-free space in which folks can rage against the mom-chine (well-played, Allison!), assisting clients in liberating themselves from the mommy complex. Parent or no, Allison challenges all of us to get in touch with our righteous anger and, honestly, there's no time like the present. Circle back to your Divine Feminine and give the patriarchal system of oppression a big middle finger. GUEST BIO Allison Staiger, LCSW, is the founder of Highwire Therapy, a psychotherapy private practice, and The Matriarchy, a feminist coaching practice. As a licensed clinical social worker certified in perinatal mental health, she works with new, expectant, hopeful, and grieving parents, offering support for perinatal mood and anxiety disorders, pregnancy and infant loss, birth trauma, caregiver burnout, infertility, and the general holy shit-ness of becoming a parent. Fed up with the insufficient and oppressive norms and narratives in our current culture of caregiving, she created The Matriarchy to help parents socialized as mothers partner with their radical, rebellious anger, and channel it into fierce feminist care. For full show notes, resources, and links to connect with our guest, visit: http://www.headhearttherapy.com/podcast *** Let's be friends! You can find me in the following places... Website: www.headhearttherapy.com/podcast Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/WoundedHealr/ https://www.facebook.com/HeadHeartTherapy/ Instagram: @headhearttherapy Twitter: @WoundedHealr @HeadHeart_Chi For full show notes, resources, and links to connect with our guest, visit: http://www.headhearttherapy.com/podcast *** Conversations with a Wounded Healer is a proud member of @mhnrnetwork.

Wenn man sich mit der Berliner HipHop-Szene rund um die Jahrtausendwende beschäftigt, kommt man an Marcus Staiger nicht vorbei. Als Gründer des legendären Berliner Untergrund-Labels Royal Bunker, welches als Freestylekeller startete, begleitete Marcus Staiger heutige Rapgrößen wie Kool Savas, Sido, K.I.Z, Eko Fresh oder Kay One bei ihren ersten Schritten im HipHop-Business. Von 2008 bis 2011 war Staiger Chefredakteur bei rap.de. Mittlerweile ist Staiger breiter aufgestellt: Er arbeitet als Journalist, Autor, Podcaster und Industriekletterer. Außerdem engagiert er sich sehr stark im politischen Bereich. In dieser Folge sprechen wir vor allem über die Entstehung und die Einzigartigkeit vom Royal Bunker, Staigers Werdegang vom Schwaben, der spontan nach Berlin zieht und die HipHop-Szene für sich entdeckt, aber auch seine Künstlerische Tätigkeit als Aktmodell. Moderiert wird die Folge wie immer von Labelchef Patrick Thiede (Chapter One & Walk This Way) und Tobias Wilinski (ThemaTakt). Folgt dem Podcast überall wo's Podcasts gibt - und bewertet ihn. Folgt auch auf Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/talkthisway_podcast/ https://www.instagram.com/marcusstaiger/ https://www.instagram.com/patrickthiede/ https://www.instagram.com/tobias_wilinski/ https://www.instagram.com/walkthiswayrec/ https://www.instagram.com/chapteronemusic/ https://www.instagram.com/thematakt/ Die Spotify-Playlist zum Podcast: http://zyrk.us/TTWSP

Heute statt einem "Let's Talk About... The Heart Part 4" doch lieber ein kurzer Talk über aktuelle Themen. Der neuste und letzte Stand zu der Releasephase von Kendrick Lamar's neuem Album sind ebenso wie Neuigkeiten zum kommenden Release von Joey Bada$$, und dem Ende der wundersamen Rapwoche von Mauli und Staiger thematisiert. Hört rein und genießt den Release von Kendrick's neuem Album "Mr. Morale & The Big Steppers"; am Montag werfen wir dann einen ersten Blick darauf.

Das war die Wundersame Rapwoche mit Mauliger & Staigeeeeeeer und natürlich mit Alina

Kampfgeschichten, Gerichtsprozesse, Twitterkäufe, Es wird nicht langweilig in der Rapwoche, solang man die Rapwelt ignoriert. Hört uns beim Joggen oder lasst euch in den Schlaf quatschen. Eigentlich egal. Wir haben euch lieb.

Clanland ist nominiert für den Deutschen Podcast Preis! Und ihr könnt uns bis zum 08. Mai mit eurer Stimme unterstützen. Über fritz.de/clanland kommt ihr direkt zum Voting. Vielen Dank für euren Support, vor allem aber auch für das tolle Feedback und eure ganzen Nachrichten in den letzten Monaten! Euer Mo und euer Staiger

Tamas war Montag noch etwas krank. Heute war er aber dann da. Deshalb kommt die Folge auch erst jetzt ABER hier ist Sie. Viel Spaß damit.

Staiger gibt lebensverändernde BJJ Tipps, Oliver Pocher muss DRINGEND wieder kassieren und wir geben kreative Tipps für Vinylboxen.

LIZ hat nicht nur kein Problem damit vermeintliche Schwäche zu zeigen, sondern geht bewusst tief in die Wunde und stellt sich ihrer Vergangenheit. Bei einer Kindheit wie Ihrer keine leichte Kost.

Mauli ist geimpft & Staiger nicht. Tja liebe Grüne - Das schmeckt euch mal wieder ganz und gar nicht aber man kann ja über alles reden.

Flexis ist ein lustiger, sachkundiger und schnell denkender User und diese Bereicherung hört man der Folge an. Gute Zeit 2 Go.

Thu, 06 Jan 2022 11:25:24 +0000 https://podcast8c48c4.podigee.io/98-neue-episode fdebf7286901ee53eeb0b0bc08e8f3f1 mit Mauli & Staiger DIE WUNDERSAME PLAYLIST: https://spoti.fi/3pC7xqL 98 full mit Mauli & Staiger no Mauli & Staiger

Staiger hat dieses eine Buch von Harari gelesen und jetzt hat er ein bisschen Angst vor Apple Watches. Naja. Zum Glück geht es nur alle 20 Minuten um die Bedrohung aus der Zukunft.

Mauli & Staiger sitzen an einem 60cm hohen Tisch auf 50cm hohen Stühlen und versuchen zu tun, als ob grad nicht einer der ikonischsten Rapper unserer Zeit von uns gegangen wär. Außerdem hält Staiger eine Lobeshymne auf das neue Shirin David Album und gibt wertvolle Serientipps.

Dr. Staiger discusses hand and upper extremities care provided at St. Cloud Orthopedics.

Welcome to Creative On Purpose Live, a show about flying higher in endeavors that make a difference. Step into possibility with integrity and intention. It's time to be creative on purpose. This season features the Ruckus Makers Roundtables - conversation about questions that matter. I'm your host, Scott Perry, Chief Difference Maker at Creative on Purpose and author of Endeavor. Learn more about me and my work at CreativeOnPurpose.com. Today I'm joined by Mark Modesti and Dustin Staiger to explore how to transform obstacles into opportunities. Let's go! Highlights from this episode: - acceptance and framing - agency and decisions - assertions and actions - empathy and compassion - where purpose and passion come from

Presenting an Unlearning challenged me to think beyond the basics. I wasn't just teaching something new, I had to change people's minds about something... something they already thought they knew. It's like creating an episode of Mythbusters, minus the explosions. This pushed me to challenge my own assumptions and dig deeper as a presenter. I realized some of my understanding regarding creativity were limited and I hadn't considered some of the more structured approaches to creativity. Another aspect that challenged me was knowing the caliber of the audience. I wanted the content to push their understandings so they unlearned as well. [To hear more episodes like this one, head over to www.unlearnings.strikingly.com and subscribe!] --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/unlearnings/support