Podcast appearances and mentions of Stephen K Bannon

Les podcasts sont des opportunités pour se poser des questions et des réflexions privées et sociales. Dans ce podcast courageux et sans tabou, nous ouvrons un esprit critique sur un sujet de santé pour permettre aux gens de mieux comprendre et d'agir en âme et conscience, avec discernement et responsabilité pour eux-même. Notre propos n'est ni de parler de victime, ni de coupable. Chacun doit se prendre en main, en tant qu'adulte libre et souverain. De plus, quoi qu'il arrive, on ne peut rien faire pour autrui, mais juste pour soi.En tant que professionnels, nous observons que des éléments importants passent sous le radar ou sont invisibles lorsqu'on divise les gens. Si on morcelle les champs d'observation et les données, on passe à côté de signaux potentiellement alarmants, voire graves. Les personnes non impactées par les traitements médicaux récents pourraient minimiser ou refuser de voir ce qui se passe sous leurs yeux, alors que les personnes directement impactées crient au scandale. Mais de quoi parlons-nous vraiment? Santé individuelle et collective? Ouvrons les yeux et le cœur sur la santé sexuelle actuelle.Comprendre la santé globale requiert que les professionnels qui possèdent chacun une visibilité sur une partie limitée du puzzle, un angle de vue réduit, se rassemblent pour partager leurs observations avec esprit critique.Que constate-t-on actuellement dans la santé sexuelle ? Les statistiques de problématiques en lien avec la santé sexuelle explosent depuis quelques années. C'est inquiétant.En ce moment, l'honnêteté de certaines institutions est peu scrupuleuse. (Scrupuleux signifie être exigeant sur le plan moral. Consciencieux. Qui respecte strictement les règles, les prescriptions… Les principes de précaution). Ce n'est pas compréhensible de l'œil du citoyen libre de tout conflit d'intérêt. Il conviendrait de demander aux personnes les plus critiques et indépendantes d'analyser les données de manière méthodique. Sans conflit d'intérêt (c'est-à-dire totalement indépendant de ceux qui ont contribué à la situation actuelle, quel que soit leur rôle). Il conviendrait de prendre plus de mesures/données (nouvelles aussi) et d'augmenter l'analyse de celles-ci. Il faut élargir le spectre de vigilance, et surtout ne pas le réduire ou le scinder en morceaux plus petits. Les statistiques peuvent être manipulées et empêcher de ce fait de voir ce qui se passe réellement. La société devrait exiger la plus grande vigilance. D'autre part, saviez-vous que tout le monde peut informer la pharmacovigilance ?Ne vous endormez pas par une médecine de protocoles autoritaires qui saurait mieux que vous. Faire remonter les informations est un acte citoyen qui ne dépend que de vous.Cela permet d'être vigilant pour soi ainsi que pour les autres. Ce que l'on aborde aujourd'hui dans ce podcast est un sujet d'autant plus important à discuter que la plupart des médecins n'osent pas aborder le sujet déjà en temps normal dans leurs pratiques (sexualité, sexologie). Et partant de ce constat, comment pourrions-nous obtenir des données officielles fiables et complètes sur l'impact des thérapies modernes sur la sexualité des gens si personne ne se/vous pose la question? A chacun.e sa route. L'important étant de prendre soin des un.e.s des autres en âme et conscience. Nous avons pris notre responsabilité. Nous vous souhaitons une bonne écoute.Citations : 1. Saviez-vous que dans son dernier interview donnée à la BBC il y a 75 ans le 25-07-1949, George Orwell, auteur du livre a dit des choses étonnantes. (Eric Blair, de son nom de plume George Orwell, a publié le livre 1984. Avant de mourir, le prophète des dérives totalitaires légua un ultime avertissement:Version originale :“I think that allowing for the book being, after all, a parody, something like 1984 could actually happen. This is the direction the world is going in at the present time.In our world, there will be no emotions except fear. rage, triumph and self-abasement. The sex instinct will be eradicated. We shall abolish the orgasm. There will be no loyalty except loyalty to the party. But always there will be the intoxication of power. Always, at every moment, there will be the thrill of victory. the sensation of trampling on an enemy who is helpless. If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face forever. The moral to be drawn from this dangerous nightmare situation is a simple one. Don't let it happen. It depends on you.”Version traduite :« Je pense que si l'on admet que le livre est, après tout, une parodie, quelque chose comme 1984 pourrait réellement se produire. C'est la direction que prend le monde à l'heure actuelle. Dans notre monde, il n'y aura plus d'émotions, sauf la peur, la rage, le triomphe et l'humiliation. L'instinct sexuel sera éradiqué. Nous abolirons l'orgasme. Il n'y aura plus de loyauté, sauf celle envers le parti. Mais il y aura toujours l'ivresse du pouvoir. Il y aura toujours, à chaque instant, le frisson de la victoire, la sensation de piétiner un ennemi impuissant. Si vous voulez une image de l'avenir, imaginez une botte piétinant un visage humain pour toujours. La morale à tirer de cette situation cauchemardesque et dangereuse est simple. Ne laissez pas cela se produire. Cela dépend de vous. »Orwell prononce deux phrases d'éveil des conscience très étonnantes à écouter en 2025:"Ne le laissez pas se produire. Ça dépend de vous !!!"“L'instinct sexuel sera éradiqué. Il aboliront l'orgasme!”2. Dr. Gustav Heinemann, président de la République fédérale d'Allemagne 1969-74, a dit: « Un peuple qui est gouverné par un pouvoir doit connaître le pouvoir qui le gouverne. Il, le peuple, doit diriger et contrôler ce pouvoir. Il doit dénoncer le pouvoir lorsqu'il commet des crimes. Dans le cas contraire, le peuple devient complice. Le fondement de la démocratie est la souveraineté populaire et non le pouvoir d'un État autoritaire. Ce n'est pas le citoyen qui est en relation d'obéissance avec le gouvernement, mais le gouvernement qui est responsable de ses actes devant le citoyen dans le cadre des lois. Le citoyen a le droit et le devoir de rappeler le gouvernement à l'ordre s'il estime qu'il ne respecte pas les droits démocratiques ».3. Dr. Mike Yeadon, ancien vice-président et directeur scientifique de Pfizer Global R&D :https://x.com/wideawake_media/status/1893984415623057835?t=OG8cpLv-Aim50fevtQSDqQWide Awake MediaPhrase originale:"[The mRNA-based Covid "vaccines"] were designed—intentionally—to harm, maim and kill, and to reduce human fertility."Traduction: « Les « vaccins » Covid à base d'ARNm ont été conçus intentionnellement pour nuire, mutiler et tuer, et pour réduire la fertilité humaine.Transcription complète de cette vidéo de 1min27: Speaker 0 | 00:00.212If you've followed me, you'll know I've spent over 30 years in research in the pharmaceutical industry and biotech. I've trained in toxicology and I've worked with colleagues designing experimental molecules that we hope will become medicines. That gives me the credentials to stand, as it were, in the shoes of the designers of these vaccines. and answer the question what were you thinking when you made these design decisions now you can go and watch any of my interviews or cut to the chase and you may not believe it but i am sure not slightly but sure these materials were designed intentionally to harm many and kill and to reduce human fertility. Well, that is my verdict. And I can stand it up. I will be in court, Supreme Court in Costa Rica very shortly, and I'll be using exactly this argument that I will give with detail. That's the first point. So don't take these injectables. Don't take the next lot either. They will also be designed to harm you. All mRNA-based materials are dangerous. Thank you.Traduction en français: Si vous m'avez suivi, vous savez que j'ai passé plus de 30 ans à faire de la recherche dans l'industrie pharmaceutique et la biotechnologie. J'ai suivi une formation en toxicologie et j'ai travaillé avec des collègues pour concevoir des molécules expérimentales qui, nous l'espérons, deviendront des médicaments. Cela me donne les qualifications nécessaires pour me mettre, pour ainsi dire, à la place des concepteurs de ces vaccins et répondre à la question suivante : à quoi pensiez-vous lorsque vous avez pris ces décisions de conception ? Vous pouvez regarder n'importe laquelle de mes interviews ou aller droit au but et vous ne le croirez peut-être pas, mais je suis sûre, pas légèrement, mais sûre que ces matériaux ont été conçus intentionnellement pour nuire à de nombreuses personnes, pour les tuer et pour réduire la fertilité humaine. Tel est mon verdict. Et je peux le défendre. Je serai très bientôt devant la Cour suprême du Costa Rica et j'utiliserai exactement les mêmes arguments que ceux que j'exposerai en détail. C'est le premier point. Ne prenez donc pas ces produits injectables. Ne prenez pas non plus le lot suivant. Ils seront également conçus pour vous nuire. Tous les matériaux à base d'ARNm sont dangereux. Je vous remercie de votre attention.https://creators.spotify.com/pod/show/rfkjr/episodes/Former-Pfizer-Vice-President-Dr--Mike-Yeadon-Speaks-Out-e10fd1hSaviez-vous : Les cellules internes des vaisseaux sanguins, appelées les cellules endothéliales, ont un rôle crucial dans les fonctions sexuelles, dont l'érection masculine et féminine. Prendre soin de son système cardio-vasculaire est fondamental. Le corps a des capacités exceptionnelles pour se régénérer si on agit adéquatement pour l'aider. Liens bonus : Un chanson explicite de circonstance choisie par le Dr Laurence Kayser: “La Vérité”, écrite, composée et interprétée par Guy Béart en 1967. https://open.spotify.com/track/1qGzkp0I8GlM86T33SjxuM?si=03rIFgIvSCym_B1EaWwEVALien pharmacovigilance belgique: Portail officiel pour signaler des effets indésirables est www.fichejaune.be ou directement via le site de l'AFMPS : Pharmacovigilance - AFMPSRendez-vous sur www.fichejaune.be pour accéder au formulaire de notification en ligne.Vous pouvez également télécharger et remplir un formulaire papier disponible sur le site de l'AFMPS.Informations nécessaires :Données sur le patient (anonymisées).Description détaillée de l'effet indésirable (symptômes, gravité, etc.).Informations sur le médicament suspecté (nom, dosage, durée d'utilisation).Informations sur d'autres médicaments éventuellement pris simultanément.Soumission :Soumettez le formulaire en ligne ou envoyez-le par courrier électronique ou postal à l'adresse indiquée par l'AFMPS.Suivi :Une fois la notification reçue, le CBPH évalue les données et peut collaborer avec des organismes européens comme EudraVigilance pour une analyse approfondieCette procédure est ouverte à TOUS LES CITOYENS, ainsi qu'évidemment aux professionnels de santé. Elle vise à garantir la sécurité des médicaments en Belgique. C'est de la responsabilité individuelle des citoyens d'agir une fois informés.Suite liens bonus :1. Jean-Marc Sabatier, référence scientifique des plus éminentes en France, chargé de recherche au CNRS. Interview de Richard Boutry sur “la minute de Ricardo” en février 2025: https://www.youtube.com/live/g8OL1qcK4ZA2. Prudence pour nous et nos enfants: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/naomi-wolf-the-pfizer-papers-reproductive-harm-death-defender-in-depth/3. Tant de vidéos censurées ! pourquoi, franchement? Est-ce cela la liberté d'expression? Evidemment, nous sommes dans une oligarchie et pas une démocratie constitutionnelle. Ces gens-là ne nous veulent pas du bien. Sinon, le dialogue serait ouvert, permis, agréable. Ici, il y a trop à cacher. Mais on n'est pas d'accord avec cet omerta. Exemples: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YrsAXNr9cVohttps://youtu.be/YrsAXNr9cVo?si=mCXb80Bq8K69paT7&t=28094. Livre : The Pfizer Papers, Pfizer's Crimes Against Humanityhttps://www.amazon.com.be/-/en/Warroom-Dailyclout-Pfizer-Documents-Analysts/dp/1648210376The WarRoom/DailyClout Pfizer Documents Analysts, Naomi Wolf, Amy Kelly, Stephen K Bannon. 408 Pages, October 15, 2024, ISBN: 9781648210389, Imprint: War Room BooksDans ce livre, Naomi Wolf affirme que les documents des essais cliniques de Pfizer révèlent des effets négatifs importants sur la sexualité humaine, en particulier chez les femmes et les bébés. Elle décrit ces impacts comme un "attentat intentionnel" contre la sexualité humaine, mettant en lumière des dommages au système reproductif et des événements indésirables liés aux vaccins, affectant les femmes dans un ratio de 3:1 par rapport aux hommes5. En Belgique, Docteur Résimont a dit récemment à propos des effets secondaires: Tout ça pour un truc qui ne protège ni de la maladie, ni de sa transmission, ni des formes graves. Depuis quatre ans, j'ai été insulté, traité de dangereux, de complotiste, j'ai perdu des amis pour avoir dit que, pour n'importe quel médoc, il y a des effets secondaires, pour avoir clamé haut et fort qu'un pseudo vaccin qui tue plus que la maladie n'a aucune raison d'être utilisé, ni rendu obligatoire.J'ai perdu mon boulot de chirurgien pour cela.6. Livre de Pierre Chaillot: Victimes des vaccins covid 19: Ce que révèlent les chiffres officiels Broché – Grand livre, 29 janvier 20257. Étienne Chouard: 10 histoires choquantes que les médias ont enterrées cette semaine #10 – Une étude mondiale révèle un lien entre les injections d'ARNm et les lésions rénales graves « Les chiffres sont stupéfiants. » L'étude, dirigée par le Dr Hyeon Seok Hwang, a analysé les événements indésirables de VigiBase de l'OMS, et ce qu'ils ont découvert est stupéfiant : les pires signaux de sécurité rénale liés aux vaccins jamais enregistrés. Alors que tout le monde parle de la myocardite post-vaccinale, personne ne mentionne les ravages que les vaccins contre la COVID-19 infligent aux reins. https://x.com/Etienne_Chouard/status/1891564873705980304?t=_dYX5waEaPd2k1WghL2y5A&s=088. Alexandra Henrion-CaudeEffets indésirables… effets sur la fertilité…absence de consentement...il aura fallu 5 ans à l'Etat du Montana pour rédiger cet INTERDIT. Et encore combien de temps pour le reste du monde?https://x.com/CaudeHenrion/status/1890857126576484836?t=etJjqQuVfGWabSQM8c_S1Q&s=089. Une lettre choc à 20 gouvernements européens: https://northgroup.info/Un groupe international de 700 professionnels et politiciens a envoyé une lettre choc à 20 gouvernements européens, exigeant l'arrêt immédiat des vaccins à ARN messager contre la COVID-19. Cette coalition, connue sous le nom de NORTH Group, inclut des médecins, avocats, scientifiques et élus de haut niveau, dénonçant les risques graves pour la santé publique.Ce mouvement représente désormais 20 pays unis pour la transparence et la sécurité sanitaire.????Les points de rupture :1. Effets secondaires catastrophiques : Les vaccins mRNA présentent des taux d'effets indésirables graves sans précédent, incluant des décès et des risques de dommages à l'ADN humain.2. Données dissimulées : Des analyses révèlent des résidus d'ADN étrangers dans les vaccins de Pfizer et Moderna, un danger jamais testé ou communiqué au public.3. Mensonge sur l'efficacité : Les vaccins n'ont jamais été testés pour empêcher la transmission du virus, contredisant les messages de santé publique.????Pourquoi ce silence des autorités ?Alors que la NORTH Group tire la sonnette d'alarme, les gouvernements restent inertes face à ces révélations. Sources : https://northgroup.info https://northgroup.info/belgium/pdf/goup_letter_belgium.pdf Séquençage du podcast:[00:00:19] Introduction et contexte[00:00:57] Qui est Laurence, en quelques mots[00:01:31] Les plannings familiaux[00:03:16] Les intentions de Laurence Kayser[00:04:38] Les intentions d'Olivier Mageren[00:06:42] En parlant de tabous[00:11:14] Les observations de Laurence Kayser[00:13:30] Comment fonctionne l'érection[00:18:57] Excuse facile : « c'est psychologique »[00:22:24] La santé sexuelle masculine impactée[00:26:43] Les statistiques et la fragmentation de l'information[00:31:40] Constatations d'Olivier Mageren en tant que sexologue[00:38:10] Une confiscation de la responsabilité individuelle[00:42:14] Une véritable guerre de l'information[00:48:44] Des solutions nouvelles existent (au prochain épisode)[00:49:08] Être responsable individuellement de sa santé[00:49:38] Un mot de la fin pour Laurence Kayser[00:50:05] Clôture du podcast

On this MUST-HEAR ELECTION DAY show, Monica drops big truths about the stakes of this election: freedom vs. tyranny.  She breathes fire about saving America, brings important historical context and shares a deeply moving story from President Nixon about how presidential candidates go through election days/nights. AND she’s joined by Stephen K. Bannon with his brilliant insights into the election. A must-listen show on this momentous day.

On this MUST-HEAR ELECTION DAY show, Monica drops big truths about the stakes of this election: freedom vs. tyranny.  She breathes fire about saving America, brings important historical context and shares a deeply moving story from President Nixon about how presidential candidates go through election days/nights. AND she’s joined by Stephen K. Bannon with his brilliant insights into the election. A must-listen show on this momentous day.

Today, thank God, America's most formidable political prisoner, Stephen K. Bannon, is scheduled to be let out of federal prison. Not since Nelson Mandela was released from jail in South Africa thirty-four years ago has the freeing of a wrongly incarcerated hero been more anticipated – and, quite likely, more consequential. The latter would apply because my friend Steve's return to the fray as a leader of the Make America Great Again movement will bring fresh energy and strategic vision to bear at a decisive moment. To the great credit of the myriad War Room guest hosts and contributors during his absence, the home fires have been kept burning throughout Steve's four-month incarceration – the result of a politically weaponized and unconstitutional prosecution. They must, and will, do so with necessarily heightened intensity and effect now that Steve Bannon is back in the fight. This is Frank Gaffney.    

Dan Fleuette, author of "Rebels, Rogues, and Outlaws: A Pictorial History of WarRoom," gives an exclusive look into the origins of Stephen K. Bannon's "WarRoom" and its evolution as a hit show. From an impromptu Sunday afternoon call from Bannon that launched the show to becoming a movement with millions of daily viewers, Fleuette shares intimate details about working with Bannon, photographing guests like Tucker Carlson and Rudy Giuliani, and collaborating with the "WarRoom" posse. Get a rare glimpse into Bannon's current communication from prison and what to expect upon his release Oct. 29. Fleuette's new book captures five years of the personalities who shaped this influential platform. Order your copy of "Rebels, Rogues, and Outlaws" now! Amazon: https://amzn.to/40kFBvk Bookshop.org: https://bookshop.org/p/books/rebels-rogues-and-outlaws-a-pictorial-history-of-warroom-dan-fleuette/21080621?ean=9781648210624

Dan Fleuette, author of Rebels, Rogues, and Outlaws: A Pictorial History of WarRoom, gives an exclusive look into the origins of Stephen K. Bannon’s “WarRoom” and its evolution as a hit show. From an impromptu Sunday afternoon call from Bannon that launched the show to becoming a movement with millions of daily viewers, Fleuette shares […]

Populism, MAGA, and Trump: Insights from Media and the Campaign Trail

Plethon, Byzantium, Italy, the Eastern Roman Empire's influence on Hermeticism & the Renaissance, Venice, Venice as a refuge of the Eastern Roman Empire, Bohemia, Thirty Years War, Reformation & Counterreformation, Elizabethan England, Shakespeare, Shakespeare's role in keeping alive the occult tradition, Peter Brook, Mormonism, Mormonism's role in American metaphysics, Mormonism's role in modern New Age movement, Bush family, Reverend George Bush, Bush's Swedenborgian church, Satanism among the Romantics, Manly P. Hall, the Philosophical Research Society PRS), Hall's death and the attempted coup at PRS, Kyballion, Charles Fort, Fort's enduring influence of Ufology and Discordianism, Vice-President Henry A. Wallace, Wallace's occult interests, the Ouija board, Stephen K. Bannon, Bannon's esoteric interests, Bannon as a Discordian, Traditionalism, Rene Guenon, Julius Evola, the future of esotericism, the end of gurus & master/teacher roles Music by: Keith Allen Dennishttps://keithallendennis.bandcamp.com/Additional Music: Albert Bouchardhttps://www.amazon.com/dp/B09DHX6JH7/ref=sr_1_1?crid=3HGDK2O22CQN0&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.VMOkbz1YKIA3xk8rSMaHpSyycbimuR7T39QtMhEacIW1k4NfeFjUGmWo9tMk7Gxs-ZWz1zenT14kA1K61d9ylbembad2iq1AuocgQlQAve9A6-CePCr7w0LlGSHb6O1FKMsA9QRuh0oOhVhRnmT-t8VH11kBieMDbXeALvX2cqE2uo3u0JwG5_OcIcK3YnNosDy2S0NhjT1IKCv6BUH2SRemDQPfn9cR4mrT2b7Kztc.Dh8Z1WB56eE3q2wJWz7Q1_tGT7o2ksyY6bQONn6Nc7s&dib_tag=se&keywords=albert+bouchard&qid=1726453739&s=dmusic&sprefix=albert+bouc%2Cdigital-music%2C481&sr=1-1 Get bonus content on Patreon Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Show Notes and Transcript Christina Bobb joins Hearts of Oak to discuss her military background, transition to media and involvement in the RNC's campaign for election integrity. We kick off with some exploration into her book "Stealing Your Vote" for insights into the 2020 election and Christina shares challenges she faced at OAN for calling out failings in the 2020 election while emphasizing the importance of election integrity.  The conversation covers alternative media platforms, social media influencers, and the impact of platforms like Twitter under Elon Musk in countering censorship.  Christina reflects on the Trump campaign's fundraising success, his connection with the audience, and addressing key issues.  We conclude with a focus on upcoming elections, serving the American people, and restoring power to citizens. Christina Bobb is an investigative reporter, attorney, and former television show host and correspondent with One America News Network, where she reported almost exclusively on election integrity. Christina began her legal career in the United States Marine Corps, serving as a defense counsel representing marines and sailors in court-martial and administrative separation hearings. She served in multiple overseas tours including Helmand Province, Afghanistan, and Stuttgart, Germany. After her military service, Ms. Bobb transitioned to private practice at Higgs, Fletcher, & Mack LLP in San Diego, and then to Washington, DC, where she held executive level positions within the Department of Homeland Security. Christina currently serves as attorney for President Donald J. Trump at the Republican National Committee. Connect with Christine... X/TWITTER        x.com/christina_bobb 'Stealing Your Vote: The Inside Story of the 2020 Election and What It Means for 2024'  Available in hardback, audio-book and e-book   amzn.eu/d/6cPQjOv Interview recorded 12.6.24 Connect with Hearts of Oak... X/TWITTER        x.com/HeartsofOakUK WEBSITE            heartsofoak.org/ PODCASTS        heartsofoak.podbean.com/ SOCIAL MEDIA  heartsofoak.org/connect/ SHOP                  heartsofoak.org/shop/ Transcript (Hearts of Oak) I am delighted to be joined by a brand new guest, one I've seen on a number of podcasts recently. I'm delighted she can join us, and that's Christina Bobb. Christina, thank you so much for your time today. (Christina Bobb) Thanks so much for having me, Peter. Good to have you on, and lots to talk about. I know you're centrally involved in the campaign there at the RNC, but people obviously can follow you. @Christina_Bobb is on Twitter. That's the main place, and you can get everything from there. But just to our viewers, to our half-and-half US, UK, to our UK viewers who maybe haven't come across, you're former US Marine, former OAN host, and since March you've been attorney at the RNC Republican National Committee, leading election integrity programs, and we'll get into all of that. And your Wikipedia describes you as mega-maga. That's quite cool. You're not just maga. And, of course, you're the author of Stealing Your Vote, the inside story of the 2020 election and what it means for 2024. And any book published by Skyhorse, we've had Tony Lyons on before, or have an introduction by Stephen K. Bannon, is absolutely wonderful. So a shout-out to the War Room posse that will be joining us and watching this interview. But, Christina, I read on your Wikipedia, it could be true, it may not be, but you played football at university, like proper football, like British football, not just American. Right, I played British football, right? I was a soccer player. Yeah. So tell us, because obviously uni and then you were involved in media. Just tell us a little bit about that before we get on to the campaign. And, of course, you bring your legal understanding to that. But you were hired by OAN back in 2020. And I remember I was there maybe a year ago, 18 months ago, getting a tour of the offices in D.C. And it's a phenomenal setup. But I know you were there as an anchor in 2020. I mean, how did that happen? How did it end up you moving into media? Yeah. So I had been in the military. Prior to that, I'd been in the military. And then once I got out, I was an attorney. I worked as a lawyer in San Diego. I was a litigator and didn't really plan on getting into media. I missed my government work. I liked doing national security work. I have a, an LLM and national security law, and it's harder to do that. At least from San Diego, certainly you can do it at firms here in DC. So, I came back to DC and joined the Trump administration of the department of homeland security. And right before the 2020 election, a few months before, well, maybe like February, so nine months before, I kind of got a wild hair and was like, Hey, I might be able to make a bigger impact in media. So I transitioned to One America News, who had a good presence here in D.C. So I left the administration and joined One America News to cover the administration. And I definitely had a bigger impact in media than I did working in the administration. So it's kind of been flying by the seat of my pants, hang on and just do what you can to make a difference. and it's been kind of a wild ride. Of course, at OAN, you were one of the people, and we'll maybe touch on how that has impacted you, but you were one of the people to call out failings you saw in the election in many aspects. And you were, I guess, had a position with OAN. You were calling out what you were seeing. And what was that like? Because I remember looking at it from this side of the pond, from far away and seeing the massive debate over that with individuals happy to speak up on what they saw and others saying, no, no, no, no, we can't really do that because of X, Y, and Z. What kind of gave you the, I guess, the boldness to just call out what you saw? I didn't think it was bold at the time, to be honest. I thought it was just obvious. And to be honest, I think maybe in the UK and overseas, y'all might have a better perspective than we do here in the United States, because you can kind of see it from a distance. When you're in the middle of it, it can be a lot harder to see and discern what's happening. I didn't feel bold. I just thought, I didn't understand what was happening. And I figured if I didn't understand what was happening, the viewers didn't understand what was happening. And so I was trying to just walk people through my own thought process and my own investigation of what I was looking into. On November 3rd, 2020 election night, I was reporting from the White House, the North Lawn of the White House. And I was just honest with the viewers. And I was like, this doesn't make a lot of sense. I don't know why they're calling Arizona a West Coast state, minutes after they called Florida probably one of the furthest East states, if not the furthest East state. So that doesn't make a lot of sense. We basically skipped the country. So I didn't feel bold. I was just trying to be honest in my reporting. And immediately I started getting attacked. I mean, I had been a reporter for a couple months at that point. I think I started at One America News June 1st or right around the beginning of June. So it had been less than six months that I had been a reporter. And I was getting, YouTube was coming after me, CNBC. A lot of the bigger networks were trying to shut me down, which I thought was so bizarre. I was like, I'm barely a reporter. Like, why are you coming after me? And then it was almost like the more they came after me, the more people started paying attention. And, I ended up sticking with the story for years. I thought I was just covering it, from election night until when we actually got a result. But I got attacked so much that it just made me go, oh, okay, well, I need to keep covering this. This is a thing. And so I kept digging into it and ended up writing a book about it. But it really was the voracious attacks that I received that caused me to go, oh, okay, there's something here. Because there's a difference, I guess, between someone who's been a host maybe 10, 15, 20 years and they can say what they like because they're kind of bulletproof in one way and they've got a track record or a reputation with someone just into the media fairly new. You kind of think, well, maybe I should just play this safe. I mean, what was that, I guess, OAN gave you, the freedom that maybe other networks would not have? Well, they did. And I'll counter your summary just a little bit. I think the people that have been in the business for 10, 20, 30 years have been in the business that long because they don't say whatever they want to say. They're parroting what the networks are telling them to say, and they're parroting what the narrative is supposed to be, not what's actually happening. And OAN didn't do that. I give them a lot of credit. They said, go report. And so I did, I took it quite literally. And I think, I think the left, is not just the left, it was really the political establishment, because we see now that it's both Republicans and Democrats in the United States that have been causing these problems and have really kind of bound our election system the way that they want it. But OAN grew, grew in popularity a lot in the the years prior to me joining, I think largely because of their coverage of Donald Trump, people wanted to see it. And so OAN had a really large following. For a while, they were the fourth ranked cable news network. Of course, now they've been de-platformed in many areas and they've had a lot of attacks come themselves. But because OAN actually had a bigger following than people want to pretend, our message was getting out, right? Not just mine, but there were other reporters in the network as a whole that were just standing behind the idea that, hey, we're not sure that this election was real. We think there were problems in a variety of areas. Let's dig into it. Let's investigate and see what we find. And I'm grateful. I'm grateful that that's the stance they took. And I think because they took that stance, the story is still alive today. You know, there's still Americans today that think there's problems with the 2020 election. A lot. I would say a majority of Americans believe that. And now the whole January 6th narrative is unraveling. And I think that's largely because of OAN and those of us that were willing to speak out and tell the truth. Well, I want to come back to you on media. And we had Maureen Bannon on just on Monday discussing this. But obviously in the war room and what they feel. But I want to come back, but I want to get on to your role now, because we've just had elections here in Europe. We have UK elections coming up. We're able to count our ballots within 24 hours and have ourselves. I know you guys like to take a few months over it. But election integrity is a massive issue. And I know that others have told me, you know, it's the border, it's the economy. But actually, election integrity, what's the point of voting if your vote doesn't matter? I mean, tell us about that and your work, because you have each state to actually cope with, where in the UK it's one system. So it is a much more difficult, arduous process you face. But what is, election integrity and what does that mean to most of the voters in the U.S.? Well, I can speak for conservatives because I think it's different. You know, Democrats, I think, are very good at changing language and trying to make things mean things that they don't. So what election integrity actually is from a conservative perspective, and of course, I think it's the right perspective, is that everybody gets the every legal voter gets the opportunity to vote and that vote is counted and that we are not diluting votes with illegal voters and that people don't get to put their thumb on the scale by changing locations or the way that votes are processed. but everybody who is lawfully allowed to vote has the opportunity to vote. Only those votes are counted, but they're all counted and we live with those results. So the way it's processed in the United States, the way it's supposed to be processed is every state and every county are supposed to run their elections independently with their own processes. That's part of the security of it, right? To have a decentralized system. But we've seen over the years, there's been a lot of creep and a lot of the same companies are running, a lot of the counties are bringing in the same companies who run, half the country's elections. And a lot of the kind of inherent security that our founders built into our constitution and into the way we run our elections has really been degraded basically through corporate structure, by bringing in outside groups and not keeping things to the original intent of every county running everything separately. To your point, I think it's perfectly reasonable to believe that every ballot can be counted by election night, even in 2020. I mean, if you look at Arizona, just looking at Maricopa County, they had 2.1 million votes that were counted on by election night but then they took another three days three or four days to count what 200 or 300 000 more ballot like why did it, why were they able to do 2.1 million in one day and then it took three days to count another 100 000 doesn't make sense Tell what because when you when you look at it you have individuals involved in overseeing and I think there's been a big call for those who care about democracy to register to be an observer and to watch it. And then you've got the fight in the individual states, how they process it. I mean, tell us about that kind of call to action for those who care about their country to be involved, to make sure that they see irregularities. Yeah, well, for all your American viewers, get involved, right? Right. If you're if you're a legal American voter and registered to vote somewhere, get involved. You can go to protect the vote dot com. That's the RNC's election integrity program. There's a lot of great grassroots organizations around the country that you can get involved in. But this is an all hands on deck moment. This is the election. We either save our country or it's lost forever and it will never resemble what it was intended to be. And I truly believe Donald Trump will be back in the White House, but it's going to be a dogfight for sure. And so we need good, honest people who are willing to follow the law and want the law followed in their areas to volunteer, to work at your counties, get, you know, your counties are now in the process of hiring effectively seasonal workers for the purpose of the election. You can get paid to work your elections, work your election, and just make sure that the law is followed and that there's not, the midnight ballot drops with no chain of custody and nobody knows where they came from. But let's probably assume they're all legitimate and just count them anyway. You know, we need to make sure that that kind of negligence isn't taking place in the elections this time around. And what is it like? Because we've seen the ballot drops. For you to have drop boxes, that's just so strange for us over across the pond. It's strange for us too. Like, it's not a thing, right? But it hasn't always been like that, has it? No, it wasn't that way until 2020. It was like in 2020, the suspicious activity of COVID occurred and everyone was like, hey, let's completely change the laws outside of the legal process. The 2020 election was conducted illegally. No question about it. Whether you want to say the illegalities changed the outcome of the election or not, okay, we can debate that till hell freezes over. But the way the election was conducted was illegal. This massive influx of drop boxes was not authorized by the legislature of any of the states, yet they were dropped off everywhere. And we're like, hey, we're going to count anything that comes into these drop boxes. And I don't know if you've read some of the stories, but Americans didn't, like, this was not a way we vote. And a lot of people in the communities didn't necessarily know what they were. So people were putting mail, they thought they were mailboxes or Amazon return boxes. There was a lot of stuff that was deposited into these boxes that weren't ballots because nobody knew what they were. And so, no, the use of drop boxes was a bit novel to 2020. And I think they needed to do it in order to have this mass influx of mail ballots with no chain of custody. The entire chain of custody in all of these states that were questioned, that changed the outcome of the election, none of them had the chain of custody to know where any of these ballots came from or who cast them. So, yeah, it's kind of weird, huh? Very weird. That's not just me. I'm glad you get as well. But I've seen different legal cases with different states. Maybe you want to let us know, have there been wins have there been losses, have there been changes, because election integrity really is key for actually getting people out Yeah, we currently have open, I want to say 87, we being the RNC have 87 open cases litigation, pre-election litigation, most the vast majority if not all of them are for the purpose of ensuring that the the election is conducted securely in accordance with the law. And we've certainly had several victories. I would say we've had more victories than losses. There's some where I'd say it's kind of a draw and then there's some where you don't win them all. But in addition to the litigation that the RNC is conducting, several of the state legislatures have passed new laws. Voter ID laws have been strengthened in a lot of states. They put restrictions on the use of drop boxes. Several cases, and most notably in Wisconsin, which they're fighting to overturn it now. But the use of drop boxes in illegal was deemed, I'm sorry, the use of drop boxes in Wisconsin was deemed illegal. Now Democrats are working to overturn that because they flipped the Supreme Court in Wisconsin. So there's a lot of jockeying. There's good, there's neutral, there's some losses. But overall, I think we're in a better position than we were in 2020, if for no other reason, people are aware of the games, right? They're aware of what's going on. Americans want to remain in control of their elections. As you mentioned earlier in the show, if we don't, if we, the people don't control the outcome of our elections, we're never going to have a chance to control the border. We're never going to have a chance to control inflation. We're never going to have a chance to control the economy and gas prices. We're never going to have a chance to have a say in education. The way we speak is through our vote. And so we have to to protect that. And I think we're in a better place, but we need people involved. We absolutely need volunteers. We need workers to work at their counties. We need people involved. Back in, I grew up in Northern Ireland, which was very sectarian. We had our own issues in Northern Ireland, but one of the phrases used was vote early, vote often. And I don't know, if you obviously have where people can vote long before, for us postal ballots is quite unusual. You kind of get it if you need, but it's not the norm. Where in America, it seems to be more the norm. How does that work? And I think you need to actually use the systems in place and take advantage of it. And that's been, I think, a call on those on the right saying, actually, if this is the system, then we need to use it instead of complaining about it. Yeah, no, you're exactly right. I mean, I don't want to say that it's normal here. I think what happened is the left pushed mail-in voting in a few states that conservatives really weren't paying attention to. The Pacific Northwest is one area, California, New York, some of the really blue states, they pushed mail-in voting in those states. Colorado is another one. And conservatives just weren't paying attention. And then they pushed, then they started pushing it in conservative states and they really went for it in 2020. And now conservatives are going, wait, wait, wait, we don't like mail-in ballots. And so we got caught on our heels because we didn't fight the fight back in the 80s and 90s when they first started this push for mail-in ballots in some of these other states that we weren't paying attention to. And if you look at those states, like if you look at Oregon, for example. Oregon was a red state. Oregon was absolutely a conservative state up until, I want to say, 89. It was either 1989 or 1987. I don't remember which one. It's in my book, though. But prior to them making Oregon a mail-in ballot state, Oregon had voted for the Republican presidential candidate in every single election except for four presidents, all the way back until when Abraham Lincoln was in office. There were nine elections, Four of them were for FDR, and then the other three were for three other Democrat candidates, all the way back until Abraham Lincoln. The rest of the presidential candidates from Abraham Lincoln, minus those four, Oregon voted for the Republican candidate. When they instituted mail-in balloting in 1989 or 87, the Republican candidate has never won the state of Oregon. So I think mail-in ballots are a problem and probably not an accurate reflection of the way voters actually feel. So yeah, I think there needs to be some real serious reform on mail-in voting, but that can't come until after the election because it's the process that we have to use right now. So we have to win within this system. 100%. Maybe you want to give us a bit of an You've been there since March, so you're three months into it. What has that been like? Because it's a different RNC than it was whenever Trump has run before. Completely changed. It's now actually a MAGA RNC. America First. Right. No, it has MAGA-fied. Mega MAGA. Mega MAGA. Which is so funny. every time they create those terms to try to offend us, it's just like, okay, well, we'll own it. I'm mega mega, I'm ultra mega, I'm whatever. They want to make it sound extreme or crazy and none of it's working anymore because they are, they are outing themselves as the extremists. But no, the RNC really is in lockstep with the Trump campaign on the political operations and getting out the vote and volunteering and just ensuring that the RNC policies and procedures are aligned with the Trump campaign. I mean, the RNC is committed to getting Donald Trump reelected back to take the White House. And I think the voters know that. I think the conservative voters recognize that this is a different RNC. The RNC leadership today is not the RNC of leadership of 2020. And I think they've got a lot more confidence in our leadership now, as they should. Tell us what role the RNC, because again, looking at it from a UK perspective, they're kind of separate entities, the party, but the individual running and people vote for the individual much more than in the UK, where it's certainly very much for the party. I mean, how does the Trump campaign, sorry if it's a dumb question, but I'm a Brit. So how does the actual presidential campaign work connecting with the party? Because they are two separate entities, but they're working together for victory in November. Yeah, they are two separate entities. And, you know, this is my first presidential campaign. It's the first time I've I've worked at the RNC, so I can't speak prior from inside, but, I will, I'll say that Donald Trump's campaign is like any other, it's unlike any other, there's not another presidential campaign. I would say probably in, in the history of the country, at least, you know, in my lifetime, maybe Reagan, maybe, but I would be willing to bet that I think DonaldTrump is surpassing Reagan's popularity. So the RNC is in a position where we either support this mega MAGA candidate that we have in Donald Trump, who really is unlike any other candidate that our nation has seen and is, is really pushing conservative values, conservative Christian values through this corruption. He's kind of like breaking through the corruption that we otherwise wouldn't be able to break through. And the RNC really is there, is really there to ensure that he, as the, I mean, technically he'll be nominated in July, but we all know he's the presumptive nominee. As the nominee, he has what he needs to make his campaign successful. And so the goal is to ensure that the Trump campaign and Donald Trump as the candidate has, like, we kind of clear the way and have what they need to be successful in their efforts. And I was certainly, I said to you before, we went live, been at three Trump rallies the last year in Pennsylvania and South Carolina. And for someone who has been years in politics in the UK, I've never seen anything like that, that this is not just, here are my 10 bullet points. And I remember I heard Ron DeSantis speak a year ago, and it was a great speech. Yep, I agree with all those bullet points. Then you go and watch President Trump speak, and you think, wow, I mean, this is taking it to another level where you connect not just with a head, but actually connect with the heart. And that seems to be how his whole way of campaigning to connect with people at a deeper level than politics normally does. A hundred percent. And that's why they're trying to take him off the campaign trail. Because what you see in the media, and you know this, you've been to the Trump rallies and you've met him. You know how he is and what it's like being in that environment. It is really powerful. And people recognize it as different. It's not the same as every other candidate that we've ever seen. It's very different. You connect to him. You instantly feel like, oh, he's speaking to me. I understand what he's saying. And the left hates that. They want the cookie cutter candidate that they can control behind the scenes and somebody just gets to be the face of the party or whatever movement they want to pretend like they have. You can't do that with Donald Trump. And in the media, the liberal media is trying really hard to take away from that they're trying to say, he doesn't have the popularity or they're trying to minimize the amount of popularity that he has, but you cannot hide it. You can hide behind poll numbers. You can fudge polls with, who you contact and, the sample that you use. But you cannot lie about the massive seas of people who are coming to hear Donald Trump and coming out to support Donald Trump. And that's why it's so powerful, because Donald Trump has pictures. I mean, you can see that 100,000 people in New Jersey, and then you've got, I think, 40,000 people in the Bronx. You see these massive seas of people. That's not a fudged poll. Those people actually showed up, and Biden's not getting anything close to that. I mean, I went and spoke at an event in Detroit a week or two ago, and it was Trump surrogates. It was an event for several Trump surrogates that people, notable conservatives that support Donald Trump and speaking on MAGA values. President Trump wasn't there. And we had a huge crowd. There was a big crowd that there were probably five or 600 people there. I would, I would think maybe close to a thousand and Donald Trump wasn't even there. Joe Biden's not getting crowd sizes that big. And my point is people who support Donald Trump are getting bigger crowds than Joe Biden himself, then their candidates. And so they don't want people to know that. So please, check it out for yourself. If you have not been to a Trump rally, come to a Trump rally. They're unlike anything you've ever been to. I would agree. And for UK viewers, just go over to the States just to be in one. It is excitement. And I think you downplay Biden. I'm sure he could fill up his basement with people. I'm sure he could. Staffers. Yeah, maybe. But what it's been. Trump's ability to fundraise is another, and I've seen it, and please correct me if I'm wrong, but with some of the more establishment fundraisers who have connected with the Republican Party holding off, but it's then the public who have stepped in, and it seems to have, those establishment funders have kind of realized that actually this is the man. And if it's not him, it's four more years of decrepit Biden. So it certainly in funding, every time he goes through a court case, it just goes up and up. But it seems to be those traditional donors are also coming behind him. Is that a fair assessment? I think some of them are. I think some of them are not. You know, and that goes to show that this is not a Republican versus Democrat election in the United States. This is establishment versus the rest of America. And the rest of America is stepping up with their dollars. And the rest of America is funding Donald Trump to make sure that he gets across the finish line because the rest of America is sick of the establishment. We don't care if you're Republican or Democrat. If you've been part of the system that has oppressed Americans, made our cost of living go through the roof, made our wages go down, basically ruined one of, if not the best countries ever to exist in the history of the world, get out of the way. And they're getting basically mauled over by this massive sea of small dollar donors who are putting up a hundred bucks at a time, but it's causing the president to raise $400 million. I mean, that's a lot of people. And Joe Biden can go to these fancy celebrity dinners where you have celebrities that might donate a million dollars at a time. Fantastic, good for him. I hope they all spend all of their money. I think they should all donate all of their money to Joe Biden and waste it all because he's gonna lose. But he can get, you know, a few people to give him several million dollars. Okay. Donald Trump is raising $400 million off of a hundred bucks at a time. Who, who do the people support? Oh, completely. Is it the border and the economy? Are they still the key issues for the voters? Yeah, the voters are really concerned about the border. They don't like the fact that, you know, words coming out that illegal aliens are being bussed into all 50 states and they're all getting registered to vote, some against their will, at least some of the reports that I'd seen. They don't like, they, they don't like the toll that this invasion is taking on our cities and that we're paying for it. In New York, they're giving away, how many 500 bucks, a thousand dollars a month to these illegal aliens when Americans are struggling to survive. And now they have to fund this invasion. It's ridiculous. So they're real upset about the border. They're very upset about education. Parents are still being targeted who are trying to protect their kids. It's a very weird position. And I don't know to the extent that you guys are seeing, I think it's somewhat similar in the UK, but this push for transgender ideology, and allowing teachers to groom children into sexual behavior, parents don't like that. Shocking. But that's another issue. And then this whole idea that somehow the education system has more rights over your children than you do as a parent. And these states are becoming sanctuary states for kids to go get transgender surgery without parental consent. I mean, it's just bizarre what they're doing. So I mean, pick an issue, Democrats will lose on it. There is not a single issue on the debate stage today that Democrats it's like, oh, they've got a good point. None, because they're all completely woke. They're all so far from anything, not just immoral, but just a basic sense of responsibility as a human to be a good human and care about other people. They're off the rails on that. And so I can't wait for this debate between Donald Trump and Joe Biden, because not only is Joe Biden completely incapable of debating Donald Trump, they legitimately do not win on the issues. And so I'm sure they're going to try to pull something out to create some distraction. And I look forward to seeing what it is. But in a free and fair debate, Donald Trump is absolutely going to crush Joe Biden. He will. And I don't know if they can give Joe Biden enough of that, whatever liquid they give him to actually keep him going. But I think they could use it all up. He won't last an hour and a half. There's no way. And Trump's energy, I mean, for someone of his age, but actually an hour and a half. And in those speeches, he's enjoying himself. He's actually connecting back and forward with the audience. And it is fun and the audience are having fun and Trump is not there to go and deliver my top 10 points. He's there to engage with the audience and gee them up and have fun. And that kind of enthusiasm and honesty is really special. It's fun and people love it. And he's gone to the point, he's done so many of these rallies and he's given so many of these speeches that, you can tell when he goes off script a little bit, but he's even started, dropping some swear words in there every once in a while, just to emphasize a point. And people love it. They're just like, Oh, thank God someone who's not like so perfectly polished that we can't relate to him now, in 2020 or in 2016, everybody hated his mean tweets. And we're like, Oh, he's mean. I don't, whatever, people love it now. They're like, Oh, thank God God, he's real. He's genuine. He's authentic. And I do give him a lot of credit too. He has learned to kind of meet people where they are. And he's, I think softened his edges a little bit, become a little bit more, I don't want to say polished. He's always been exceptionally polished, but a little, a little bit more political. I feel like I'm offending him saying that, but he's, he's learned to, to play the game a little bit. He's elevated his political game, I should say. And now it's great, now it's just a great mixture of he's got that raw humor, but he's got he's politically refined now and it's just, he it's like he's hitting his sweet spot right at the perfect time. Really is and of course he's we kind of forget that he's not a politician, that that's not his background his background is in business to step into this and I think that was part of his undoing in in 2016 and 2020 where his maybe wasn't aware of how the system works, of the deep state working underneath and this election I think this is why he is so dangerous to the left because now he is aware of what is happening and that actually the RNC and others are putting people ready, so they're ready to step in place and so it's not just trusting actually it's been more purposeful and organized and planned than maybe it was before. For sure. For sure. I mean, this campaign is way, way above where it was in 2020. And quite honestly, even the president himself says it's better than the 2016 campaign. I mean, the enthusiasm, the support, the huge crowds, it's unlike any other campaign Donald Trump has run. He, I mean, I don't know what kind of records you can set, but he's setting them and he's setting all of them. And I think the left is helping him with these crazy indictments and convictions and trials and the abuses of government and the fact that the left is using the government to try to retain power and attack their political opponents. It's clear as day in the United States that that's what's happening. And Americans don't like it. They really don't like it. And Americans want to retain control of their government. And so the longer this goes on, the more people are switching sides. And I fully expect Donald Trump to be back in the White House in 2025. It certainly is a more sophisticated campaign, 100%. Can I, in the words of that wonderful press secretary, circle back to finish off on the issue on media? Because this, again, is different, even though it wasn't 2020. I don't think the alternative media was so well-developed. You kind of had Fox moving away and maybe OAN and Newsmax fit into that. But now you've got a plethora of alternatives, of Turning Point USA. InfoWars, you have WarRoom. You've got, I mean, it's masses of small, medium and large companies, individuals actually championing the causes that Trump is believing in to put America first. How does that, as someone who kind of has experienced the media and are now involved in the campaign itself, how do you see the media play out? And I mean, how much longer can the media on the left actually cheer Biden on? Well, they're running at a runway. I think they're hoping to hang on through the election, but I don't think they're going to make it. You're exactly right. I think the uprising of podcasts and radio stations and social media influencers. Conservatives are available to voters in a way that they weren't even in 2016 and probably not even in 2020. And it has really decentralized media, right? It used to be you had to watch Fox, CNN, or MSNBC, and that's where you got your information. That's where everybody got their information. Well, nobody believes those networks anymore. And so a lot of people have transitioned and are watching Newsmax, OAN, Real America's Voice. There's a number of other conservative news outlets that are available to people. But then you also have folks watching shows like your show where they want to tune in to a person that they like. And so it can kind of be personality centric. But however people want to get their news, people are able to receive the information in ways that they couldn't before. And I think I'll credit Elon Musk with taking over Twitter, which is now X, because I mean, we were all silenced, absolutely silenced on what used to be Twitter. Andour posts were suppressed. Our followers were haemorrhaged. You know, we, every, everybody probably remembers what it was like to be silenced on Twitter. And with the emergence of X, it, I do think it has changed the game for the better. You obviously, there's still things about it that I'd love to, to see a little bit different, but I give Elon Musk a lot of credit for kind of taking the gag off of the individual people who needed a platform and social media with the platform. And he basically freed it so that those people now have a voice too. Apologies to RAV not mention it was on with Tara Dahl and Kaelan Dorr last week, so sorry RAV definitely you're there, but there's also a a push by I mean OAN have faced that with getting removed off some of the networks obviously the system wants to to put Steve Bannon in jail for four months, the last four months the last four months of the number one political podcast America like, let's join the dots there. And of course, what's happening to Alex Jones and InfoWars is huge. And you've got others, but you've still got other networks with Blaze and Daily Wire. It's a whole plethora, but there is a cost, I guess, for speaking truth. You've seen that personally, but also these media outlets are seeing that. And yet those voices we've talked about, those channels, they don't care. They just want to fight. There's nothing you can do to Steve Bannon. He just, well, we need to fight harder. And that's the response we need, I think, in the media. Well, yeah, and I think it is. Back in 2020, there were a handful of us that were talking about the election, but there weren't many. And they tried very hard to silence us. And I'm so grateful that I've had the support that I've had at the time from OAN and now at the RNC and with the Trump campaign and that they have supported what I want to say and what I want to speak about it. We have to fight for our rights. I mean, our constitution, our bill of rights is only as good as if we use it. It's only good if we use it and we have to use it. And I think right now we're being put to the test of, do you believe that your constitutional rights are actually valid and stronger than anybody who's trying to manipulate them or destroy them? And I say, yes. I say, I think at the end of this, it's painful. I certainly will come out with a few bumps and bruises, but I do believe that the Constitution is stronger than those that are trying to manipulate it, lie about it, break it, destroy it, and solidify power among a select few. That is the antithesis of what the United States of America is. We are a decentralized nation in theory by design. Power is decentralized among the 50 states. And it's the voters that control power in the United States, American voters. And we have to restore that. We're getting there, but we have to restore that. You've got, what, five months more of this. You'll certainly want a break at the end, I'm sure. But you've got, and I've never, looking at politics across the world, you see campaigns kind of moving and then hitting roadblocks and reassessing or changing. With the Trump campaign, it just seems to kind of just keep doing what you're doing, keep ramping it up. You're hitting on all the points. And that's fairly rare as well, that there aren't the mistakes. Trump is a known quantity. He's got people around him he knows and trusts. But yeah, it's just, it seems to be just keep doing what you're doing. And that'skind of quite rare, I think, in elections to have, I guess, that confidence at the front where it's not opinion polling and talking to different groups. What should we talk about? Trump knows what to talk about. I think that's also refreshing, that honesty and, I guess, knowing where the vision is at the top. Yeah, and that really comes from him. I mean, I think he intuitively understands the everyday American, which is really fascinating how that happens. But he does. He gets it. He understands what they want as parents. He understands what they want as voters. He understands what they want as far as the borders concerned, as education is concerned, as the economy, every issue. He gets it. And it's a very and he jokes about this in his speeches. He would say it's common sense, but it turns out it's not that common anymore. Like, you know, it's just common sense of how the government needs to be run. And I think the difference is because he truly is in this for the American people and he truly is trying to make our way of life the best that it possibly can be. Whereas when you have other politicians that need to do opinion polling and figure out what people want to hear about, it's because they're not actually in it for the people. They're in it to try to win their own races. And so they're trying to figure out how do I win my race rather than how do I best serve the people? And Donald Trump is 100 percent aimed at serving the American people and making sure that the power of the American government is restored to the American people. And people are getting it. They get it. And you don't have to do big surveys. He just understands what they need because he's in it for their best interest. And it's unique because most politicians are in it for their own best interest and he's not clearly, clearly he's not in it for his own best interest It's true as I said I've heard him speeches, why am I doing this, life will be easier but I'm doing it because it's the right thing to do. You don't usually hear those words from politicians. Christina I really appreciate you coming on, I know you're exceptionally busy with the RNC campaign. I really appreciate you coming on and really encourage, the the links will be in the description for your book 'stealing your vote' and if the viewers, listeners want to delve into and remind themselves what happened in 2020 that is a perfect place to go so thank you so much for joining us Christina. Thank you so much for having me.

It's Friday, so it's time for The Campaign Moment — our weekly roundtable conversation to help you keep track of the biggest developments of the 2024 campaign.This week, we hear directly from some undecided voters about how Donald Trump's criminal conviction lands with them. Senior political reporter Aaron Blake, who writes The Washington Post's new Campaign Moment newsletter, and Isaac Arnsdorf, who covers Trump and the MAGA movement for The Post, sit down with co-host Martine Powers. They also discuss Stephen K. Bannon's upcoming stint in prison, as well as President Biden's executive order curtailing asylum and its implications for the campaign.Today's show was produced and mixed by Ted Muldoon. It was edited by Renita Jablonski and Mary Jo Murphy. Subscribe to Aaron's newsletter, The Campaign Moment, here. Subscribe to The Washington Post here.

Welcome to The Campaign Moment, The Washington Post's weekly politics roundtable to help you keep track of the biggest developments of the 2024 campaign.This week, we hear directly from some undecided voters about how Donald Trump's criminal conviction lands with them. Senior political reporter Aaron Blake, who writes The Washington Post's new Campaign Moment newsletter, and Isaac Arnsdorf, who covers Trump and the MAGA movement for The Post, sit down with co-host Martine Powers. They also discuss Stephen K. Bannon's upcoming stint in prison, as well as President Biden's executive order curtailing asylum and its implications for the campaign.Today's show was produced and mixed by Ted Muldoon. It was edited by Renita Jablonski and Mary Jo Murphy. Subscribe to Aaron's newsletter, The Campaign Moment, here. Subscribe to The Washington Post here.

In this new episode of Right On Christian Radio, we explore the power of faith in Christ amidst challenging times and unravel the complex issues plaguing our society today. We emphasize the significance of faith as we unravel the veils of deceit within religious and global circles, discussing powerful influencers like Stephen K. Bannon and his true beliefs beneath a Catholic persona. We welcome John of "We've Read the Documents", as he encourages faith over fear and shares his well-researched insights on unfolding world events. Amidst bleak discussions on migratory crises and massive psychological operations, our conversation advocates for love, peace, and kindness regardless of circumstances. This episode also delves into the controversial Operation Warp Speed and Operation Tiberius Kirk initiatives, debating on potential threats to individual freedom and privacy. We engage in philosophical and theological dialogues involving Bible commentaries, the definition of Christian faith, signs of end times, and speculations of a possible apocalypse. We also journey through the tricky landscape of drug tolerance, discussing hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin's controversial usage against COVID-19. Discussions further touch upon PTSD effects, faith in big pharma, and the potential long-term implications of COVID-19 vaccines, spotlighting theories of possible human genome alterations. This thought-provoking episode promotes critical thinking and discernment about faith, societal issues, and global health trends. Tune in and deepen your understanding with us. Direct Link: Right on Community ROC Prayerfully consider supporting Right on Radio. NEW! Super easy Support Right on Radio | Right on Radio (Powered by Donorbox) donorbox.org/support-right-on-radio-1 Support Right on Radio https://patron.podbean.com/RightonRadio (Patron is billed by "The Speakers Company" PayPal for Jeff paypal.me/JeffRamsperger Mushrooms click here and check it out PetClub 247 ror.petclub247.com copy and paste for healing mushrooms. Click Here: https://www.empshield.com/?coupon=ror Save $50 on each unit with coupon code ROR Join the movement, make the switch My Liberty Stand – Taking back our country or email rightonjeff@gmail.com Web Site: Right on Radio | a podcast by Right on Radio (podbean.com)  New Rumble Channel Right on Radio (rumble.com) Subscribe Back up Video Channel on Odysee https://lbry.tv/@RightonRadio:9 Right on U Link: https://rightonU.com -Real Estate Investing, use code SAVE800 -Creating Wealth  USE Coupon Code SAVE20 -STAR Achievement System Purchase for $17 use coupon "STAR" Get Swag www.rightonmerch.com    Follow on Twitter X @JeffRighton Subscribe:https://rightonradio.podbean.com/​ Follow: https://gab.com/  Right on Radio​ Telegram: https://t.me/right_on_radio [Main Channel] Digs https://t.me/RightonRadioDIGS Chat https://t.me/RightonRadioCHAT Live Right in the Real World! We talk God and Politics, Faith Based Broadcast News, views, Opinions and Attitudes We are Your News Now. Keep the Faith

In Today's special episode of "Moment of Truth," listen to exclusive excerpts from the Gala for American Statecraft featuring Senator J.D. Vance, David Sacks, Stephen K. Bannon, and Blake Masters. American Moment hosted the Gala for American Statecraft at the Kimpton Hotel Monaco in Washington D.C. on March 6-7, 2024.#GalaForAmericanStatecraft #AmericanMoment #Gala #Speech #Keynote #JDVance #DavidSacks #StephenKBannon #Bannon #BlakeMastersBecome a 'Truther' or 'Statesman' to get access to exclusive perks. Watch ALL EPISODES a day before everyone else, and enjoy members-only bonus content: youtube.com/channel/UC4qmB5DeiFxt53ZPZiW4Tcg/join––––––Follow American Moment across Social Media:Twitter – https://twitter.com/AmMomentOrgFacebook – https://www.facebook.com/AmMomentOrgInstagram – https://www.instagram.com/ammomentorg/YouTube – https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC4qmB5DeiFxt53ZPZiW4TcgRumble – https://rumble.com/c/ammomentorgOdysee – https://odysee.com/@AmMomentOrgBitChute – https://www.bitchute.com/channel/Xr42d9swu7O9/GabTV – https://tv.gab.com/channel/ammomentorgCheck out AmCanon:https://www.americanmoment.org/amcanon/Follow Us on Twitter:Saurabh Sharma – https://twitter.com/ssharmaUSNick Solheim – https://twitter.com/NickSSolheimAmerican Moment's "Moment of Truth" Podcast is recorded at the Conservative Partnership Campus in Washington DC, produced by American Moment Studios, and edited by Jake Mercier and Jared Cummings.Subscribe to our Podcast, "Moment of Truth"Get our Cancelproof RSS – https://feeds.acast.com/public/shows/moment-of-truthACast – https://shows.acast.com/moment-of-truthApple Podcasts – https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/moment-of-truth/id1555257529Spotify – https://open.spotify.com/show/5ATl0x7nKDX0vVoGrGNhAj Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Its an election year like no other.  Not only are American's going to decide their future but this election goes far beyond the shores of the US like no other Presidential election any of us remember.  Its always an honour to have Steve Bannon join us on Hearts of Oak to give his expert analysis.  WarRoom broadcasts for 4 hours a day and Steve has his finger on the pulse of what is happening in the US and beyond like no other.  So, how will the next year play out?  Was it a forgone conclusion that Trump would win the Republican nomination?  Has his support for the 'vaccine' harmed his chance of being re-elected?  What role does the GOP play in this election especially now that the RINO Rona McDaniel has been replaced by Michael Whatley and Lara Trump?  Steve tackles all of this before we finish with a chat about WarRoom.  The WarRoom Posse (followers and subscribers) are the most hardcore committed lovers of freedom and have found a kindred soul in Bannon, MAGA and in Trump.  What part will WarRoom play in this election and how can the Posse make sure President Trump is returned to the White House? Stephen K Bannon is a political strategist and host of The WarRoom. He was an officer in the United States Navy for seven years in the late 70s and early 80s, after his military service, Steve worked at Goldman Sachs as an investment banker and left with the title of vice president. In the 90's Steve ventured into entertainment and media and became an executive producer in the Hollywood film and media industry which gave him the background to become co-founder and executive chairman of Breitbart News. He was adviser to Donald Trump's 2016 presidential campaign and later served as chief strategist in the Trump White House. Connect with Steve and WarRoom... WEBSITE           warroom.org GETTR               gettr.com/user/SteveBannon                            gettr.com/user/WarRoom TELEGRAM        t.me/BannonWarRoom PODCAST          warroom.org/podcast/ RUMBLE            rumble.com/BannonsWarRoom Hearts of Oak WarRoom Playlist... RUMBLE             rumble.com/playlists/GeiAaHFzet8 Interview recorded 13.3.24 Connect with Hearts of Oak... WEBSITE            heartsofoak.org/ PODCASTS        heartsofoak.podbean.com/ SOCIAL MEDIA  heartsofoak.org/connect/ SHOP                  heartsofoak.org/shop/ *Special thanks to Bosch Fawstin for recording our intro/outro on this podcast. Check out his art https://theboschfawstinstore.blogspot.com/ and follow him on X https://twitter.com/TheBoschFawstin?s=20 

Welcome to our regular look back at the past seven days, and this episode we have the brilliant Joe Allen to give some of his thoughts on the talking points this week and we expand on some of his recent posts on X and Substack. Joe is the transhumanism editor for Bannon's WarRoom and has his finger on the pulse of what is happening, be it race, robots or religion! Topics for analyzation... - Scaling the Future™: openai now generates about 100 billion words per day. - Huge multinational brands including Nestle and AstraZeneca, are using AI to monitor employee messages. - Secular Society: How long till the Cyborg Theocracy ascends via the Constitution? - AI is rewiring coders' brains. Yours may be next. - Time to start pondering The Merge? - World Governments Summit 2024 - Be Gone Satan: Tony Blair appears like a bad smell at the World Governments Summit. - OpenAI chief pursues trillions of dollars to reshape business of chips and AI. -  New AI unveiled that instantly generates eye popping videos. - The collapse of reality? Synthetic dreams are swarming out of Sora from OpenAI Joe Allen is a fellow primate who wonders why we ever came down from the trees! He has written for Chronicles, The Federalist, Human Events, The National Pulse, Parabola, Salvo, and Protocol: The Journal of the Entertainment Technology Industry. He holds a master's degree from Boston University, where he studied cognitive science and human evolution as they pertain to religion. As an arena rigger, he's toured the world for rock n' roll, country, rap, classical, and cage-fighting productions. Joe now serves as the transhumanism editor for Bannon's WarRoom. Dark Aeon: Transhumanism and the War Against Humanity with foreword by Stephen K Bannon available from Amazon... https://www.amazon.co.uk/Dark-Aeon-Transhumanism-Against-Humanity/dp/1648210104/ref=tmm_hrd_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=&sr= Connect with Joe .... Substack             https://joebot.substack.com/ GETTR                 https://gettr.com/user/JOEBOTxyz X                          https://twitter.com/JOEBOTxyz?s=20 War Room           http://warroom.org/ Recorded 16.2.24 Connect with Hearts of Oak... WEBSITE            https://heartsofoak.org/ PODCASTS        https://heartsofoak.podbean.com/ SOCIAL MEDIA  https://heartsofoak.org/connect/ Support Hearts of Oak by purchasing one of our fancy T-Shirts....  SHOP                  https://heartsofoak.org/shop/ links from episode... openAI https://x.com/JOEBOTxyz/status/1756287900214505517?s=20 AI to monitor https://x.com/JOEBOTxyz/status/1756404856170963214?s=20 secular  https://x.com/JOEBOTxyz/status/1756448788481290310?s=20 rewiring brainshttps://x.com/JOEBOTxyz/status/1757046377073279061?s=20 The Mergehttps://x.com/JOEBOTxyz/status/1757086206439850249?s=20 World Governments Summit https://www.worldgovernmentsummit.org/events/2024/world-government-summit-2024 Tony Blairhttps://x.com/NoorBinLadin/status/1757849038907424955?s=20 Reshape Business of Chips and AIhttps://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/sam-altman-seeks-trillions-of-dollars-to-reshape-business-of-chips-and-ai-89ab3db0 Sorahttps://x.com/JOEBOTxyz/status/1758205072830300670?s=20 https://x.com/JOEBOTxyz/status/1758265237264888099?s=20

An exhilarating and uncensored account of the maverick tech titan's wild life, a breakneck journey from Silicon Valley to his sudden, mysterious death in a Barcelona prison.“John McAfee is an American original—bold, brilliant, unpredictable. Characters like him came from a different era—not the woke, soy boy, non-confrontational culture of modern high tech. You meet McAfee head on in No Domain—in his raw energy and spit-in-your-eye cussedness. Buy this book, read this book, and understand—could anything, even John McAfee, kill John McAfee?” —Stephen K. Bannon, White House Chief Strategist, Host: War RoomDelete everything you think you know about tech pioneer John McAfee, whose antivirus software operates on millions of computers around the world. Uninstall any impressions you have of the man depicted in the news, the man in disguise and on the run in Central America, even the man who reinvented himself as the Libertarian Party's candidate in the 2016 presidential election. Move these images to your brain's trash file. The real John McAfee is far more complex.Drawn from hours of conversations between Mark Eglinton and John McAfee in 2019—while he was hiding in an undisclosed location—No Domain: The John McAfee Tapes provides startling insight into the extraordinary life of one of America's genuine renegades. McAfee shares his life story like it's his last will and testament, providing revelatory details on the abusive father who shot himself when John was a young boy; the life-changing LSD overdose in St Louis, during which he was nearly convinced by voices in his head to try to kill his first wife and daughter; the unexpected government clearance that led to him working on CIA dark programs; the combined affinity for mathematics and hallucinogens that informed the hedonistic nature of his software company in Silicon Valley; the attempt to find a quiet life in Belize only to become a pariah in the eyes of the local militia, from whom he'd later flee, having been framed for the murder of his neighbor; and the subsequent years on the run in the US, evading a cast of pursuers, including the Sinaloa Cartel, while burying bags of money and valuables in marked locations around the Southwest, before fleeing the country on his yacht.John McAfee has lived a life that defies description. This larger-than-life biography documents it all.This show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/1198501/advertisement

GUEST OVERVIEW: Lee Stranahan is an American journalist who has written for such diverse publications as Huffington Post as a featured columnist and for Breitbart News as the lead investigative reporter. Lee has also been featured in films including Stephen K. Bannon's Occupy Unmasked and the Oliver Stone production Revealing Ukraine. Prior to his work in journalism, Lee had a successful career as a producer, visual effects artist and teacher in television and film production. Twitter: https://twitter.com/stranahan Sputnik Bio: https://sputnikglobe.com/author_lee_stranahan/ The Backstory on Sputnik: https://sputnikglobe.com/radio-the-backstory/

Show notes and Transcript Joe Allen has just written a book that is a warning to humanity. In Dark Aeon he has unpacked the uber complex issue of Transhumanism and shown how this move towards merging human with machine is the biggest threat humankind now faces. Joe returns to Hearts of Oak to show how this is about control and not simply technology. He points to the main actors in this frightening plan who now operate in plain sight. And he ends, as he does in the book, by looking at the spiritual side of this. Not only numerous end time warnings from the bible but also how personal faith and trust in God can guide us through this assault on our very soul. Joe Allen is a fellow primate who wonders why we ever came down from the trees! He has written for Chronicles, The Federalist, Human Events, The National Pulse, Parabola, Salvo, and Protocol: The Journal of the Entertainment Technology Industry. He holds a master's degree from Boston University, where he studied cognitive science and human evolution as they pertain to religion. As an arena rigger, he's toured the world for rock n' roll, country, rap, classical, and cage-fighting productions. Joe now serves as the transhumanism editor for Bannon's WarRoom. Dark Aeon: Transhumanism and the War Against Humanity with foreword by Stephen K Bannon available from Amazon...https://www.amazon.co.uk/Dark-Aeon-Transhumanism-Against-Humanity/dp/1648210104/ref=tmm_hrd_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=&sr= Connect with Joe .... Substack: https://joebot.substack.com/ GETTR: https://gettr.com/user/JOEBOTxyz X: https://twitter.com/JOEBOTxyz?s=20 War Room: http://warroom.org/ Interview recorded 11.9.23 *Special thanks to Bosch Fawstin for recording our intro/outro on this podcast. Check out his art https://theboschfawstinstore.blogspot.com/ and follow him on GETTR https://gettr.com/user/BoschFawstin and Twitter https://twitter.com/TheBoschFawstin?s=20  To sign up for our weekly email, find our social media, podcasts, video, livestreaming platforms and more...https://heartsofoak.org/connect/ Transcript (Hearts of Oak) Joe Allen, it is wonderful to have you with us here at Hearts of Oak. Thanks so much for joining us today.  (Joe Allen) Good to be here, Peter. Thank you very much.  And we're obviously going to go into your, book, which is just out, which is Dark Aeon, Transhumanism and the War Against Humanity. We will delve through that, and I have read most of it. It is a book you can dip in and out of chapter by chapter. We will go through that and it's always good to have a book that's, different than the norm. It doesn't fit into the normal books I think often we come across on the conservative side. It's a completely different subject and subject that most people are probably afraid to even engage with but we'll get into that. Obviously follow Joe @JoeBotXYZ on Twitter, joebot.xyzonline. He is Transhumanism Editor War Room Pandemic. And maybe Joe, we can first jump in. We've had John before to talk about this and this book obviously 400 plus pages goes really into depth on this subject from different angles. But Joe, your background was in the entertainment industry. As a rigger, you worked behind the scenes piecing venues together literally. How did you get from music concerts in the entertainment industry to be a technology journalist? Well, you know, I think journalist might be pushing it. Journalist might be pushing it, but I've been a writer ever since I was a child and I began writing professionally. 2007 was my first published article. And so as a writer, the goal has always been just describe reality in as smart-ass of tone as I could possibly muster. As I've gotten older, it's gotten a bit more serious, a little less smart-ass. Not entirely. If you've read the book, you can see that there's plenty of smart-ass left in me. But well, I spent most of my adult life between the arena and academia. So when I did my undergrad, I needed a job. I went down to the arena at my school, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, and began working as a stagehand. Quickly noticed the guys climbing both in the rafters in the arena and also on the stages. Thought that might be a preferable gig to lugging boxes around. So very early on, I pushed my way into the climber, the stage climber and then rigger world. And that was where I stayed for about 15 years, give or take. And I would dip back into academia, that lifestyle, that job gives you a lot of time off. And so I would audit courses, I audited courses in Asheville, North Carolina, audited courses in Portland, Oregon, and then eventually took my master's degree at Boston University. So in many ways, the rigging gig was a way to accumulate money that I could waste on a useless education. So that was really my entire life until the pandemic was between those two worlds. And once the pandemic hit, not only could you not just simply walk onto a campus to ask questions of a professor or visit a library, obviously the work of stagecraft was completely destroyed. And even when it came back, it came back with masks and vaccine mandates and all that stuff. But, you know, once the hammer fell in regard to the COVID pandemic, I knew that I would also have to change in order to stay sane. I packed up a survival bunker on wheels. I began traveling cross country. I watched the race riots and I watched the the mask holes versus the naked faces. And spent a lot of time out in nature. And at that time you could spend a lot of time in nature by yourself. There weren't hordes of people everywhere for the most part. So, it was during that time that Bannon discovered my work at The Federalist, and once I went on The War Room, he hired me almost immediately. I've been there for two and a half years. So, for two and a half years, my brain has been completely saturated with transhuman doom. It's quite interesting, because in the book you mention, I think in the introduction, that you weren't really interested in politics that much, and you end up being on one of the most political shows online, one of the most popular political shows online. It's weird how COVID has taken us and dropped you in that environment. You know, Steve has always had an interest in transhumanism. He's always been a bit freaked out by it, and I think anyone who understands the full implications should be. Even if you're excited about it, you should be freaked out about it. So it was always something that was bracketed from the rest of the show. Now, arguably, conservatism is all about preserving that which was handed down traditionally, and to some extent, that which was handed down familially. And so there's really nothing more conservative than wanting to conserve Homo sapiens. You know, the title of the book has a double meaning in both the title and the subtitle. The title Dark Aeon is a reference to a period of time, but Eon, actually, this has been a war between, this is the real war between me and Steve, is it Eon or Aeon? It looks like he's winning, but Dark Aeon is a reference to a period of time. It's also a reference to Gnostic entities, which we can go into in more depth if you would like, but there is definitely the element of Gnosticism is very, very important in the book. The idea though of transhumanism and the war against humanity, that also has a double meaning. On the one hand, it's the war against what it means to be human. The very identity of human being, that the notion of transhumanism is that the human being is something to be surpassed, something to be ultimately transcended by way of technology. On the other hand, there are strains of transhumanism which predict that the technologies we are developing right now are in fact developing a life of their own. They will eventually, through evolutionary processes, that they will eventually come to dominate and replace us, if not destroy us outright. And so, whether it's the gentle version of transhumanism, which seeks to transform the human being irrevocably, or whether it's the harsh post-human world, which is envisioned as one in which humanity goes extinct or is completely destroyed, just like that, and is celebrated, it is undoubtedly a war against humanity. So the notion of conservatism, to conserve, to preserve what we have, it does really fit with any sort of resistance to, or conflict with the transhumanist worldview. It would be very difficult to do so from a liberal point of view, I think, if you are a true liberal, because a true liberal is all about freedom. And it's all, you know, the true liberal does not want the constraints of tradition. The true liberal does not want the constraints of even the body in many ways, right? You can see it in the trans movement. You can see it in many of the sorts of sexual and transracial and crossracial sorts of culture. So, yet, at the same time, and I know that this is probably going on too long and getting too complicated, at the same time, there are a lot of left-wing arguments against transhumanism, but primarily they revolve around the idea that billionaires are in charge of human evolution at this point, that billionaires are directing the very fate of the species. So it's a complex landscape, and I hope that the book captures that. Well, I just want to take two, one quote which is on the back of the book, but the few lines I think certainly on Amazon says, like a thief in the night, artificial intelligence has inserted itself into our lives. It makes important decisions for us every day, often we barely notice. As Joe Allen writes in his groundbreaking book, Transhuman is the great merger of humankind with the machine. And then there is a Naomi Wolf writing on the back, which is high praise and makes me very jealous. And she says, Joe Allen's Dark Aeon is the first comprehensive critical analysis of the planned post-human future. It will give you great clarity as well as nightmares. Allen has long been our most thoughtful authority on this ill-understood catastrophe and no one who wants humanity to survive should ignore his warnings here. I feel like we should just finish the interview at that point. I mean that's enough. When you're people saying that, you must realize, and you do realize I guess, the importance of this topic and the importance of getting this information into people's hands to ready them for what's coming.  Yeah a lot of people I think even in the War Room crowd, they see a topic like transhumanism is very abstract. It's very much in the future for them, right? Like it's not something that's relevant for today and therefore it's not worth paying attention to. I think that misses a lot of the ways in which the transhumanist ideology is poking through into our reality already by way of various technologies, not least of which would be say the MRNA vaccine or the chat bots, which have rapidly begun to flood educational systems, corporate environments, and of course the internet itself. People don't necessarily link that to the transhumanist view, either because they're not familiar with it or because those don't seem as dramatic as the predictions and the prescriptions of the transhumanists. But I don't see it as being necessarily the most important issue, it just depends on how these technologies pan out and of course how people accept them and use them. But without a doubt, if you look at the various problems that face the West, as a series of layers, whether it be demographic integrity, whether it be sexual and gender propriety, whether it be the preservation of religious tradition or familial traditions, with clan traditions, for you Irishmen out there. I think all of these, basically what we see in the 20th century is an invasion of every border, just ramping up, ramping up, ramping up, whether they be national borders, whether they be the borders of the body, the borders between genders, the borders between races, the borders between language groups, and of course the borders between religious groups. All of these have been shred in an attempt to create some sort of multi-culti homogeneous, just grade out Borg. Riding on top of all of that is technology. And it would be crazy to say that transhumanism is driving all of this. I don't think so. I think that it's more of the kind of thing that sits at the pinnacle of it. The ultimate border between human beings and machines is being dissolved, first conceptually, and then in actual physical reality. It's very subtle, not unlike what amounted to a very rapid demographic transformation of America and more and more so the UK. It was something that wasn't noticed at first. It wasn't really noticed until it was too late, at least not by enough people. I fear that the same is happening with technology. People are already melded to their smartphones. Their personalities have become, like the most relevant aspects of their personalities are imprinted on the digital field. And so as we move forward into whatever future lies ahead of us, I think that the alarm bells, they tend to go off momentarily. Oh my God, there's nanobots in the vaccine. And then when none of that pans out, the more slow, subtle role into the merger between man and machine takes place without really any sort of resistance or oftentimes without anyone noticing. One thing I came across, transhumanism is, as you so often present it, has been about technology and the robot side. But throughout reading your book and right at the beginning, you also bring out the side of power and control and certain individuals and it seems to be as much as that element of control as it is about that element of technology. Absolutely. Various modes of control. So at its core, transhumanism is about the individual being able to control themselves by way of technology and technique, about being able to control nature, of course, be that clearing land for a new data centre, or be that controlling the weather itself directly by say seeding ice nuclei into the clouds. It's also about controlling other people. That rarely ends up being something voiced explicitly, but it's implicit, occasionally it is, but it's implicit. The idea that one's will, one's will to power will be expressed through technology, well, that's also going to include the social sphere. Whether or not that is the stated intention, undoubtedly the technological system that we live in right now. If you think of the cyborg as a relationship between the animal or the organism and the machine, and the cyborg is a two-way control system so that the organism has control over the machine and therefore over nature, society, so on and so forth. But the machine also has input into the organism. And the ratio of control, whether or not the organism is the primary mover in the system or whether or not the machine, and that varies. And what I see in the current technological landscape that we live in, there is an illusion that the average person has control over this technological system. But nobody's telling you what to order from Uber Eats. Nobody's telling you where to buy that plane ticket. Nobody's telling you who to friend on social media, nor are they telling you what to say on there. Not necessarily, but what is happening, aside from the barriers, you are not going to do this, is that by and large, propaganda, both subtle and overt, has put the desires into people's minds as to what they want from these systems. And so very often you see that people are chasing their desires within that technological structure, and these are desires that were put into them by the corporations or even the governments that these systems serve. So as far as control goes, these systems, whether we're talking about social media itself, the tight relationship between the human mind and the internet, which has become just insane in the last two and a half decades, it's astonishing how much people just take it for granted that the internet really is a secondary piece of our cognition. But the control system itself, what you see, again, whether it's the internet, whether it is the digital currencies that surveil everything that we do, and eventually will most likely be used to stop us from doing what we are not wanted to do, to the digital ID systems, all of it amounts to a control system in which the participant in the West has the illusion of control over the system, when in fact, it's corporate and government power exerting control over us en masse and individual by individual, then of course in China, it gives you a real good idea of where it could go in the West, where it's just simply overt. You have the city brain data centers that gather all of the surveillance data, and it's just obvious that the entire purpose is for social control, a kind of cultural eugenics, or the smart eye system connected to it, so that everywhere in China there are surveillance systems that the common understanding is if you run afoul of the state, then the state can get you no matter what. That's implicit in America, and I think anybody who's paying attention knows that's also the case. But in America, maybe it's even more dangerous. There is the illusion that you have control over the system, that the system is going to respond to your desire. But I see it very much as top-down. There's more technocracy than transhumanism, but I see those as, as Patrick Wood so aptly said, you know, technocracy and transhumanism are really just two sides of the same coin, one being related to the social structure and the other being related to the worldview.  At the beginning you gave statements from two world leaders, Klaus Schwab, you say, our life in ten years from now will be completely different and who masters those technologies in some way will be the master of the world. That was a recent one. Then you also give Putin from 2017 and he says whoever becomes the leader in this sphere will become the ruler of the world. You mentioned China. I'm wondering in the West, have we come to the point where there's just simply too much faith and trust in our leaders? Uh, yes and no. I think that, um... There is a lot of cynicism in America, both left and right. So it's very interesting to see so many people that really don't believe in the system anymore and yet have become tools of that system, very much so. In fact, I don't know how intentional or not it is, but the sort of dissident movements both left and right in America, and perhaps in Europe, you would perhaps be able to educate me on that. But those dissident movements have, I am very much in awe of and appreciate the energy within them, but I really do wonder where we end up from here with this degree of just rampant cynicism and atomization and social discord. You saw it explicitly during the pandemic. Everybody who was a mask hole, everybody who was a vax maniac, they wanted to see the other side die. Not everyone, okay, everyone's pushing it, but there was a very strong and oftentimes voiced desire that we are the smart ones, we are in line with the science. We can't wait to watch you all rot in the streets like we're in Stephen King's The Stand. Then it was quite interesting When the vaccine rolled out and you started seeing all the cases of myocarditis, you started seeing the heart attacks, the people who died suddenly and all this, and a lot of things that I think are hooey, but undoubtedly the damage done, that cannot be argued against in my mind. You saw the same desire on the side of the anti-vaxxers, the anti-maskers, right? That all of these people, occasionally you would hear people trot theories out that everyone who got the vax would be dead within two years, and now that we're three years in, everyone will be dead of cancer in five years. And then I suppose once we get to that point, those who keep pushing it along, this desire to see the other side disappear. This desire to see the whole thing come down, come crumbling down, I don't know where it goes, but it's obvious that it's very strong. And I fear oftentimes that we're being maneuvered into these psychological states, that perhaps both sides will get their wish. Perhaps both sides will get to see the other side disappear. So, I don't know if that answers your question, but I think that those who cling to the normalcy of the Democratic leaders or any more, those who cling to the cult of personality around Trump in America, they're hanging on to anchors that I don't believe will hold. The Democratic Party, obviously, that's a shit show. And Trump, I just simply, I want to believe that he'll be able to come in and make greater impacts than he did before. I'm not holding my breath. As for all those who are completely disillusioned with those two, you know, very old white men, right? I sense that we're seeing the beginnings of a crack up. And so where does technology sit in all of that? I think one of the real ways in which technology will affect this, aside from being the medium through which these struggles take place, that if you end up in a point where your society is totally balkanized and where many of the people in the society are atomized, they become that much easier to control, especially to kind of craft digital realities around their minds. And with the advent of artificial intelligence as it exists now, we really are facing an era where each individual mind or each sort of in-group can be easily manipulated. They can be easily monitored, their sentiments, their thoughts, their opinions. And then you can craft messages using AI or do it by, you know, in a sense manually, but such as say Obama's rhetoric that was built off of mass data mining. You can, right now, GPT offers the ability that if you can lure people into a relationship with an AI, in the future, I believe, and not too distant future, they won't even know that it is an AI. But at the moment, it's just, it's more of the kind of subtle crafting of rhetoric for any given group or any given person, made much more efficient by these technologies. You can just crank out propaganda without really any limit. And if you have any sort of access to the monitoring systems, if you pay a third-party company in order to monitor certain crowds online, to monitor certain communications, or if you are the corporations such as Google, Facebook, Twitter, or if you are the federal government with back doors into these, You can monitor, and this has been true for two decades now, you can monitor groups, and it's much easier, like if I could sit and watch you in your house day in and day out, it'd be much easier for me to manipulate you. And that is the future that we're facing, and the more balkanized we become, I think the easier it will be to create control systems, even as it looks like opposition. 100%. I was intrigued that right at the beginning of the book, I mean you don't hold back, you say early on humanity 2.1, 2.0 will be transnational, transcultural, transgender, transracial, transspecies, and at its extreme edge transhuman, the merger of man and machine, they're ready to create heaven on earth, digital currency will be life's blood. Hard-hitting, I'm wondering, how did you manage looking into this vast subject, which is rapidly changing and advancing, how did you manage to look for the truth and expose what was happening whilst at the same time, I guess, keeping you sane and the reader sane? I hope the reader stays sane. I'm not sure that I've stayed sane. Really, the two main projects of the book are to look at the ideas of what the future will be and to look at the ideas of what these technologies, how these technologies should be used and of course looking at where these technologies are right now, and imagining the possibilities. All transhumanism is in essence, is it's a response to a rapidly evolving technological society. You have all of these radical technologies and the question of how do you use them. So this has been true from the plough on, right? And if you've looked at comparative agriculture, different societies have done it very, very differently. And with the advent of trains, planes, automobiles, especially automobiles, if you look at the difference in how LA is set up compared to New York City or Mumbai, how these technologies are used are very, very, very different, both because of the quality of the technology and just the organization. That changed everything about the human social structure. What we're facing right now, just as over the last two or three centuries, industrialized Nations have been able to terraform the earth around them to just completely alter the habitat in which human beings live not only within the cities But even without right literally moving mountains without the faith of the mustard seed, What we're facing now is a moment in which you have technologies that can be turned inward that can begin to terraform the human being itself So, the transgender movement is oftentimes pointed to as an example of this. I think that it is one aspect of it, without a doubt, sometimes explicitly declared by various transhumanists, in some ways, maybe even just symbolically, kind of a canary in the coal mine, but you see this radical and oftentimes very disturbing use of technology to completely alter the human. I fear though, Peter, that again, as people focus on these extreme cases, they don't realize that their minds are already being terraformed by the digital environment. Whether it's something good, whether it is Jesus Christ coming to you through your preacher in the screen, or whether it is the devil himself coming through the various sorts of satanic entertainments that have, for decades now, enamoured the youth, it really ultimately boils down to the human being creating a relationship with the machine so that whether you are left or right, whether you are a Christian or atheist, whether you are fascist or communist, I think that the pre-technological way of life, the pre-technological state of mind, say, from let's just pick a random date, the 20s, okay? You've barely got movie theaters at this point. Automobiles are kind of a novelty puttering around. They're not common. The first planes have gotten off the ground. It is very low tech. You're just now starting to understand at that point where these technologies are going to go, but the human being has been left basically intact. Whether you have the kind of proto-fascist or the fierce nationalist movements or whether the communists, yes, the ideologies make a big difference as to the social structure and the direction of the nation, but insofar as the actual quality of the human being, the way in which the human being lives, the type of human being we're talking about, I think that people of that period, just to pick one, you could pick any one of them, people that period have more in common with each other. And we have more in common with each other by virtue of this new technological way of life than we do across, right? So that the fascist of 1930 is really more similar in the ultimate way in which the human being is expressed, more similar to the communist of that era than he is is to the fascist of our era, or whatever. Just pick any ideology, any sort of Christian, Hindu, Muslim, whatever, any mode of being. I think this is really, really important because what we're talking about is a civilizational transformation by way of technology. And conservatives are oftentimes pushing these technologies saying that this is going to empower us, this is going to allow us to win, we'll finally be able to win, we'll use AI, we'll be able to send out messaging and we'll be able to analyze the landscape, we'll be able to create war bots, we'll be able to do all these things. Yeah, that's probably true. But ultimately, when you look at the transhuman vision, the vision that human beings are intended just by virtue of the laws of nature herself are intended to create and merge with and perhaps to give up their own existence to machines that whether it comes from the left, whether it comes from the right, whether it's libertarians, whether it's the communist, capitalist hybrid in China, it really doesn't matter. All of these different facets are just ratcheting it up and ratcheting it up. And conservatives, oftentimes I think that they have some sort of delusion that we'll be able to go just this far and no further. But that's never happened. And I don't see any reason for it to now. I'm actually, insofar as staying sane, I don't think that, one thing that reassures me, it's you've never seen a global transformation that was equally impactful across the board. So, you have certain centers of power, certain centers of influence, you have certain areas that are gonna be transformed more than others, that have been transformed more than others. Silicon Valley versus a farm in Kansas. So, I don't think, like, when people talk about the future, they oftentimes talk about, like, they talk about it as if every single human being will experience the same thing all at once. I think it'll be very, very different. It'll be very different in rural America than it will be in urban America, just as it is now. It'll be very different in present-day First World nations than it is in Third World nations, just as it is now. But at the same time, at the bleeding edge of that, you are going to see just the same transformation we've seen both socially, psychologically, spiritually, culturally over the last, pick, three decades. That transformation, barring an EMP or barring technical difficulties that no one could have foresaw, we are going to see an even more rapid transformation. The question is, do you belong to that transformation? Do you go along with that? Do you resist it? And if so, what the hell are you going to do? How are you going to live? How do you live outside a system that is completely digitized? If everybody uses digital currency and you say no, how do you buy things? If everyone uses digital IDs and you say no, how do you get the goods of society? How do you be, how are you a person in that society? And of course, you're thinking of the radical technologies such as artificial intelligence, or even the more minor noninvasive brain computer interfaces which undoubtedly do confer certain advantages. If your competitors are making use of these tools and you're saying, no, I'm a Luddite, I'm not going to do it. How do you compete? These are very, very difficult questions. And I can't say that I offer any definite answers, but I hope to at least give some hint that it doesn't have to be the same for everyone all the time. But if you are going to drop out of the system, If you indeed are put off by the notion of merging humankind with machines, you had better figure out some fucking way to live in this world. And as you say, conservative thinking go certain point and no further and this is not about a just about a possible dystopian future, it is about what is happening today and with Amazon and palm payments with Alexa listening to all we say to make our lives easier, with tesla discussing self-driving cars would not have the bother of driving, WorldCoin from open AI. It's all a kind of a vision of the Jetsons, a golden age made possible by technology to make our lives easier. There is a great PR campaign going on that this is all about, we can sit back and just do little and technology will live our lives for us. And many people are happily on that travelator. Yeah, that dream is, again, that's the central thrust of the book is what are these dreams? What do they dream of? And not just the intellectuals, but also people like Elon Musk, people like Larry Page, people like Jeff Bezos, what are their dreams? Because their dreams are going to guide and shape the course of human history. They already have. That's going to continue. Money, wealth, power, political pull, that is always going to shape the world. But you are never going to actually see the full realization of those dreams, right? They're always going to be half of what was dreamt. Material reality will always drag it down to some extent. There's always some sort of glitch. But some version of them are already coming to pass. And as you just mentioned. You've already got the rampant use of digital currency. Most people, most of their purchases are done via digital purchases now. So you don't need a chip in your palm. You don't need a palm scanner. You don't have to be completely plugged into the system biologically in order for all of the desired effects of using digital currency to be realized. They track everything that you're doing, that you're spending, and of course it leaves the option to shut you off, to debank you, and we've seen just a few instances of that. I imagine that since nobody has really stood up and done much of fucking anything to stop it. That will continue. The political enemies will be punished in this way, and I suspect that if our side returns to power in any meaningful way, those same methods will be used on the other end. So when you think about the ultimate trajectory of all these, though, you just mentioned the classic list, it's really like people do not realize where this is going unless they see the mentality behind what kind of person would put in place a system in which you would pay with your palm. Clearly someone who has no respect or caution about the prophecies contained at the end of the Bible, because it's so on the nose. It's crazy. You'd almost think that they're doing it just to mess with the Christian mentality. It is so clearly resonant with the mark of the beast. That includes also the sort of, you'd mentioned world coin, the biometric system that scans the iris and gives you cryptocurrency and allows you to prove that you're human on the internet, and then of course you have Clear, the company that is set up in every airport in America for the most part and across the world I believe, but you've got Clear that you're tying your biometric, your body to your digital identity. It's obvious that it allows for convenience for you. It's also obvious that it allows for total control from the top. One last example that you just mentioned, and it's a really, really critical one. Autonomous vehicles. People have oftentimes said, kind of like with flying cars, which have yet to manifest, well, if AI is so great, why don't they have self-driving cars? Whatever happened to that? A lot of people who aren't paying attention are going to be very, very surprised at how rapidly those will roll out. Already, Tesla and Google and various other self-driving companies, their cars, even though it's a smaller sample size, their cars are actually safer than human beings driving. So that statistically, there are fewer accidents and certainly fewer fatal accidents with these machines. The problem is that when they do happen, like when one of them freaks out and starts running somebody over, or when you hear a story about the car swerving off and hitting a bicyclist or something like that, there is this instinctive reaction to the idea of a machine doing it rather than a human, there's nobody to be responsible for it, there's nobody who could control it, that is really the barrier to these things being rolled out. It's really not a matter of the technology improving, although they will continue to try to improve them, it's really a matter of public acceptance and how do you craft the policy to prove liability in the case of an accident. And once you end up in a system in which you have, let's say you have a dramatic shift in the same way that nobody wore a fucking mask in America until 2020. You you get this dramatic shift in which people suddenly think okay. Well, these autonomous vehicles are much much safer and I don't have to worry some crazy redneck in a truck trying to run me off the road or some ghetto mama, you know, menacing me with her who ride. You just simply turn the entire infrastructure or at least some vast portion of the infrastructure into an autonomous system. And at that point the trucker convoys are a very very good example if you just imagine forward to a world in which everything is autonomous or at least most vehicles are autonomous and the trucks would probably be among the first to convert in that direction. You don't have trucker convoys in that world because it's just a matter of flipping the switch and it's done. There is no individual choice in that if they decide that you no longer have that choice. And it's very, very important going forward that people realize that even if old tech, the rather inconvenient tech, or the older, more traditional arrangements do have their disadvantages competitively, that is really where a lot of our freedom comes from. The organic provides for much more freedom than the digital, at least ultimately, Because the organic cannot be controlled directly, the digital can. I want to just end off on, you mentioned about the biblical side, and that's kind of part three of the book, Reflected Inversion. But just the book itself, it's what, 450, 460 pages, and that might put off people on a topic like this. And yet, I certainly found it that the 13 chapters read like maybe 13 different essays, 13 ways of maybe looking at the problem we face. Is that kind of what you wanted to bring out in the book, that kind of style to present to the viewers so they could dip in and out? Absolutely. You know, there's an arc from beginning to end. You can see the clear progression, but let's say that you are curious about the origins of this movement, say Ray Kurzweil. There's chapter two for you. Let's say that you want to understand the evolutionary paradigm and how it bleeds over into the technological. That's chapter four.  The people who have, the more astute observers who have noticed the ways in which the great reset or just the entire pandemic phenomena shifted people towards a more digital existence. There's chapter five for you, you know, so on and so forth, the satanic elements. Chapter seven is a comparison of Yuval Noah Harari with Elon Musk. Probably my favorite chapter to write is the eighth chapter, in praise of mad prophets. The real thesis of that is that being insane and being correct are not mutually exclusive. It's pretty astounding how spot on in a symbolic way. People who are schizophrenic or acid casualties, that they were really able to tune into the kind of technological nightmare that was coming towards us, even as far back as the 1700s. So, every chapter is its own little world, but each one bleeds into the other. And for those who are really interested in the religious side of it, the third part is entirely focused on the religious side. The first, the ninth chapter, Images of Jesus is looking at these technological developments in light of what we can glean from the Bible. And virtual gnosis, on the other hand, is looking at that Gnostic element, that Gnosticism being an inversion of the Christian mythos, but then transhumanism being a subsequent inversion of the Gnostic mythos. It's really, I don't think you can understand the deep impulse behind transhumanism, the deep impulse to overcome the body, to transcend the biological by way of technology, without understanding Gnosticism. And I don't think that they're one in the same. I'm not an everything's narcissism kind of person, but the connection is very obvious. It is, in fact, like I say, it's yet another inversion. So my hope is that any reader could pick it up and browse through at their leisure or start from the beginning. I mean, you'd be a better judge than I, but I hope that I used colloquial language and enough fart jokes to keep you moving along. But yeah, and just so that people aren't too intimidated, it's 400 pages minus the meticulous citation. I did, there is a lot of citation at the end, mainly because I don't want anyone to be able to accuse me of making any of this stuff up. Everything in the book is me trying to channel the possible futures that these people are dreaming up. And by the end, I hope that you understand how they connect to the actual technological system that we live in. And I hope that you have the wherewithal to come up with something better, because there's not really any way for me to tell people how to live their lives in the face of this, but I do have hope that plenty of people will be able to chart their own courses through this future. And I have every hope that barring some planet-wide extinction-level event, that human beings, that traditional humanity, that religious humanity will in fact endure, Although  I'm fairly certain that we're facing a dark eon, so to speak. Oh, yeah. Just for the viewer, I read it with one of these, going through and marking it. I often wish that when I have guests on, that the book would be just, you kind of switch your mind off and you can read it. And it usually isn't like that. It's usually wow, wow. And certainly, this is a book, and I think the viewers and listeners will find it when they get hold of it. As it is one that that makes you think. But let me just touch on that last third part before making sure people know where and when they can get it. That third part, I mean as a Christian I found it intriguing, the third part, and you said you start off part three, reflected inversion, the book of humanity has an unshakable herd instinct. Fall on the wrong side of the race debate and you risk being condemned. Fall on the wrong side of the tech debate and you'll be accused of controlled opposition, fall on the wrong side of a religious debate, and you'll be mocked as superstitious. And yet, Joe, you bring not only the Bible and end-time theology into it, into the last part, but you also refer numerous times to your own personal faith and struggles in accepting who Jesus says he is, what the Bible teaches. And I find that intriguing, that you personalized it. Was that a thought at the beginning on how you fit that in to the book, or did that come out as you begun to write the book? It came out fairly early. My main motivation was that I'm writing about all of these different religious ideas, and I thought that I wouldn't want someone to think that I believed those ideas, but I also wouldn't want to convey the impression that I believe exactly what they believe. I sense a lot of times in religious writers, popular religious writers, an attempt to, use the cross as a selling point. They kind of use the cross as a billboard for the value of their work, and so I myself am a Christian, but certainly, one reason I entitled that chapter, Images of Jesus, a Confession, is to give the reader an idea of where I'm coming from on this, whether they find any value in it or reject that perspective entirely, just so that there was, I don't want people to be under the impression that I'm coming from coming at this from a place that I'm not. And the hardest thing to me in Christianity is the demand for a certain magnanimity, a certain peaceableness, for forgiveness and charity. These things are very easy to put aside when we are amped up in tribal warfare, which we are. But that is in fact, as I see it, the core, not only of Jesus's message, but of many other religious figures across the planet. And it's a mystery to me as to why, but there's one thing I believe, it is that the message of Jesus in the gospel, that you cannot serve two masters, God or mammon, in the message that one must turn the other cheek. I know there's like a million different ways you can wiggle out of that using various linguistic turns, but it's pretty clear as a whole that what Jesus was talking about was a kingdom not of this world and therefore a kingdom whose tactics are not involved with this world. And because that's so difficult, I'm oftentimes averse to calling myself a Christian because I am an asshole. And so the idea of running around waving a cross while continuing to be my manimal self, this is more than I can bear. But yes, the religious element, transhumanism is a techno religion and you can't understand it's religious contours without understanding traditional religion. And so again, my hope is that there is at least enough in there to give you a sense to contrast the two and hopefully, you know, it just either validates or inspires you to explore these things more on your own. I truly do believe that traditional religion, that the spiritual impulse and humanity really is the only thing that will save us. And so it would be impossible for me to leave that out. I think the Apostle Paul, I'm sure one of his verses in some translation was, I am an asshole, but Jesus. I'm sure that is a translation. Let me bring up, for those watching US, probably 25% of our audience, the book is available now. For those in Europe, UK, it's coming out 9th of November. Is that correct, Joe? Yes. Unfortunately, at least with Amazon, maybe you could get it from Skyhorse Publishing. I'm not sure. Right now, it's available on Amazon, Barnes & Noble, bookshop.org and skyhorse.com among other places. So it's possible you could get it from there, but yes, unfortunately the Amazon UK will not have any until November. I've been blown away by realising the back catalogue that Skyhorse have. I hadn't come across Skyhorse until a year ago. Of course, this is jointly done with Skyhorse and War Room. Just final thought, Joe, what do you want to leave with the viewer when they get the book? What did you thought, did you want to leave with them as they read through it? At the risk of repeating myself, I really think that you have to understand the contours of this transformation that we're under. It's not a conspiracy, or at least as far as I can tell. There are too many parties and there's too much inter-infighting and opposition between them in competition. It's worse than a conspiracy. You just have a tendency in humanity, ambition, the lust for power, the lust for control, that is present across the human race and technology empowers that. When we're talking about transhumanism, the development of artificial intelligence, the development of robotic systems to replace human beings and devalue them, the introduction of brain-computer interfaces or genetic engineering, all of these are about power. If you were to destroy the World Economic Forum today, it would continue in Silicon Valley. If you were to destroy both, it would continue in Shenzhen in China or Beijing. These are mushrooms growing up from mycelium that is pervasive in humanity. In that sense, as this civilizational transformation takes place, I don't think that you're going to do well going forward, if everything is hitting you in the face like a wet fish and you're completely knocked off guard, I think that it offers an opportunity to feel out the future that they are dreaming and that has already been partially realized and hopefully allow you to dream up your own world. What world do you want your children to inhabit and how do you want them to approach the new world that we're facing. That's the key. It is a religious transformation. It is a technological transformation and I think that the only two elements that we have at our disposal are the affirmation of the deepest spiritual qualities that we have access to, and also the, steadfast and just obstinate to insist on saying no. Because more and more these systems of compliance are going to impose themselves on us. You've got a lot of practice during the pandemic and when to say no and how to say no. I think that skill will be very useful going forward because more impositions are on the way. Joe, thank you so much for joining us. I'll just leave the viewer and listener once again with Dr. Naomi Wolf's recommendation. Joe Allen's Dark Aeon is the first comprehensive critical analysis of the planned post-human future. It will give you great clarity as well as nightmares. Allen has long been our most thoughtful authority on this ill-understood catastrophe, and no one who wants humanity to survive should ignore his warnings here. And people can get it everywhere. The links are on the description. Joe, I appreciate you coming along and sharing the book, which is, congratulations, it is a fantastic book and certainly should be read by everyone. So thanks for coming on and sharing insights from the book. Peter, I really appreciate it, man. Thank you very much. Please subscribe, like and share!

Show notes and Transcript Col. (Ret) John R. Mills is former Director of Cybersecurity Policy and International Affairs at the Department of Defense. You will have seen his many appearances on War Room with Steve Bannon where he brings his in-depth understanding of national security to the War Room posse.  John is also part of the Center for Security Policy, Committee on Present Danger China.  A year ago he published "The Nation Will Follow: First hand Experiences Fighting the Deep State and the Action Plan for the American Citizen".  We start by discussing how John first became aware of the existence of the Deep State through a brief encounter with a colleague in one of the many corridors of the Pentagon.  He unpacks what exactly the Deep State is, how it is anti God and why it will stop at nothing to take down President Donald J Trump and we finish by looking at John's next book which will be published within months which goes deeper into the war against the Deep State. COL (Ret) John R. Mills is the former director of cybersecurity policy, strategy, and international affairs at the Department of Defense. COL (Ret) Mills has had an immense impact on a number of significant national security events over the last 40 years, from the Cold War, Peace Dividend, War on Terror, World in Chaos, and the era of Great Power Competition.  He has served multiple combat tours, this service has been both in uniform and as a senior civilian for the Department of Defense and included service with the National Security Council at the White House across two Administrations.  He has served in joint, conventional, and special operations units and as a senior staff planner on the Chairman's Joint Staff. John is a part of the Center for Security Policy, Committee on Present Danger China, Spectrum consulting group, an adjunct Professor for a major University's Graduate Program, founder of the National Election Integrity Association, and a regular Op-Ed writer for the Epoch Times, NewsMax, and Daily Middle East. There is a Deep State – and this is the citizen plan of action for what they can do in their immediate neighborhood, the ground upon which they live. That plan involves activating and equipping all citizens with the knowledge of how to represent themselves locally to make a national difference. In a raw, personal and bold account, Colonel Retired John Mills will show us how he, like Whitaker Chambers, played a part in both allowing the Deep State to get a foothold in the federal government and then taking action against it. What is needed is decisive action, directed at the right, precise topics, at the levels of government we know best. The Nation Will Follow is your guide and plan to take that action and take on the Deep State. The Nation Will Follow: Firsthand Experiences Fighting the Deep State and the Action Plan for the American Citizen available in paperback, e-book and audio-book from Amazonhttps://www.amazon.co.uk/Nation-Will-Follow-Firsthand-Experiences/dp/1956257578/ref=tmm_pap_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&sr=8-8 Connect with Colonel John.... WEBSITE: https://thenationwillfollow.com/ GETTR: https://gettr.com/user/colonelretjohn TRUTH: https://truthsocial.com/@ColonelRETJohn SUBSTACK: https://substack.com/@colonelretjohn Interview recorded 11.7.23 *Special thanks to Bosch Fawstin for recording our intro/outro on this podcast. Check out his art https://theboschfawstinstore.blogspot.com/ and follow him on GETTR https://gettr.com/user/BoschFawstin and Twitter https://twitter.com/TheBoschFawstin?s=20  To sign up for our weekly email, find our social media, podcasts, video, livestreaming platforms and more... https://heartsofoak.org/connect/ Please subscribe, like and share!   Subscribe now Transcript (Hearts of Oak) Colonel John Mills, it is wonderful to have you with us today. Thank you so much for your time. (Col Ret John Mills) Peter, an absolute honour to be on your show. Thank you. Absolutely great to have you. And people can see where they can find you, @ColonelRetJohn, on Truth and on GETTR, the nationwillfollow.com, which we're going to get into, but I encourage everyone to go and make use of the website and see what John has put together. And, John, you're so many people, touch a former director of cyber security policy. I know you served 35 years as a colonel and senior civilian, and you've been involved, as I've learned from just reading the book, at many different areas and aspects of, I guess, the government level, the military level, the Pentagon, so many areas. But it's probably better for me to ask you to introduce yourself and touch on some of those areas, because I certainly can't give honour to all the things you've done. So maybe take a moment or two to introduce yourself. Maybe two thirds of our viewers are UK, we're about 20% US, but two thirds are the UK. So take a minute to and introduce yourself to our audience before we jump into your book. Yeah, thank you, Peter. And also ColonelRetJohn on Substack will be Colonel Ret John all the time more Colonel Ret John than you can handle. And it'll just be a firehose of Colonel Ret John on Substack. But so Peter, I mean, I stopped counting at 35 years because I still have, I still do consulting, I'm very heavily involved in think tanking and things like that. So I'm very involved in the game, but I stopped counting at 35 years, but I kind of break up my time into five eras of service. I came in during the Reagan years and the Cold War. A child of the Cold War, I grew up in the Cold War with nuclear weapons, on alert, not too far from where I grew up. I came in during the Cold War, during the last decade of the Cold War, and it was an exciting time. It was the Reagan era. We were good, they were bad, and we were gonna put the Soviets out of business. It was as simple as that. It was an exciting time, some of the Reagan years. Then it evolved into the peace dividend years. I did a tour in Bosnia, worked closely with the British in peace making and peacekeeping in Bosnia. Learned a lot about a lot of things. So those are the peace dividend years when we'd wonder what is the purpose of our military? What do we do with our military? And then it evolved into the War on Terror. But it was, we even, even before then, this person named Osama kept on coming up in meetings, Osama. This guy, Osama, what does this have to do with us? But I don't get it. Who is this guy? Training camps in Afghanistan. So, I don't understand what's going on. So, it was the War on Terror years. And it was, it was a righteous anger in the response. But you know, as time has gone on, who knows some of the truth of things that went on. But it was as we spun up the US and world machine to hunt down terrorists, for a period of time, things seemed to be working. But that started to morph into from the war on terror to the, I called it the, during the Obama, Biden years, the world in chaos, the world in chaos. And then it became the, after that we'd say great power competition. And now, as we realized what was going on with China, and now it's the great showdown with China. The fifth act is the great showdown with China and the battle to save the republic here in America and actually worldwide.  Well I know we've had Frank Gaffney on talking about his book The Indictment on China. I know you're a fellow of the CSB, so one of your many other parts that you play. But going on to the book, if I can just bring up, this is what the viewers will find on the website. The Nation will follow. I'd encourage everyone to go there. I enjoyed John's book on audio. You can obviously get it as a hardback, paperback. And so much to find, so please go to the website and make use of the information available there. Order your copy. It's a short book, 200 pages. You can read it quite quickly. It'll give you such an overview of The Deep State, really, in the situation there. But maybe I can bring you back. Chapter two, Encounter on the A-Ring, and the quote there, which obviously made you think of what was happening, was, we see more opportunities with her. Do you want to talk about that encounter and how that maybe opened your eyes to what was happening deeper. Well, thank you, Peter. So roughly, it was like July 2016. And I was rushing to a meeting in the Pentagon, you always go to the A-Rank so you can get you can spin around and come out to the, the other part of the Pentagon. You can get to anywhere part of in the Pentagon in eight minutes, if you know, know how to navigate. I was rushing to a meeting. That's what you do in the Pentagon, you rush to meetings and I was in the A-ring, the inner circle of the A-ring and I ran into somebody who had been a Bush appointee, somebody I trusted, somebody I worked with very closely together, somebody I looked at as a mentor, a friend and I just, we ran into each other. I said, well, what are you up to? Where are you going? He says, well, I'm being a greybeard. That's being a sage counsel during some something, some meeting. I'm a grey beard. And and I and I said, well, you know, I said, well, the didn't mean be political, but it was he was a Republican and a Republican appointee. And I said, well, the convention's coming up at this point in time. Trump had knocked out 16 in a row. I was originally a Cruz guy. But hey, after seeing 16 knockouts in a row, I'm Trump. OK. And I said, well, you're going to support Trump at the convention because I knew he was going to the convention. He said, this changed, first thing that changed my life was becoming a saved believer in Christ, but the second and not as important, but pretty important was what he said. He said, when I said, are you going to support Trump at the convention? He said, no, we see more opportunities with her. And I was just, for a second I was just, I didn't know what to say and then I almost lunged at him and I said, who is we and what opportunities do you see? And I just, everything flashed in front of my eyes and my career. I said, Donald J. Trump was right. There is a swamp, there is a deep state, and I just ran headlong right into it. I was shocked. And that, must, is you hadn't come across this in your time in the military. Maybe touch on how you made the step from, I guess, serving, you mentioned serving in Bosnia, how you, that move to actually being in the Pentagon, because the Pentagon is, I've driven past a number of times, and it's this iconic building. How did you end up actually physically being in there? Well, that's a very interesting question. So after 9-11, I was actually with another government agency at that time. I was in San Antonio. We home-schooled our son. I was at a big conference in San Antonio on 9-11, I had my son with me. He was in the room doing his work, but the TV was on. I He said, Dad, you need to come to the TV, something's going on. So I said, oh my. So bottom line, once we got back to the DCC, which is a story in itself, it's in the book. I was actually sent to Central Command, Central Command, and I was in the J5, and I worked for Admiral Cunningham, Admiral Cunningham, not British fleet, Admiral Cunningham from earlier days, but I mean, this is American Navy, Admiral Cunningham. We had no standing con plan or contingency plan for Afghanistan, shockingly enough. We have a lot of what we call con plans, not for everything. And this is one we didn't have for Afghanistan. So I was working outside of the Admiral's office with me, somebody from another government agency, an army planner, and a couple of Air Force C-17 drivers. And so we're kind of trying to come up with the plan. And so his door would be open and Rumsfeld or my president would be on the line saying, what is the blankety blank plan? Give us something. And I felt like a script writer in Hollywood because we're outside, you know, okay, here's the deal. Here's what, here's the next one. They don't like that one. Okay, here's what we're going to do next. So anyway, we came up with the plan for Afghanistan. Shortly after that, I was sent to the Joint Staff because they needed a war planner inside what is called the J3 on the Joint Staff. This is the highest staff in the universe. This was, until woke-ism, the best staff in the universe, all due respect to Whitehall, and I love my British Five Eyes partners. And I've spent time in Whitehall, And I,  there's more on that in the book, but so I went to J3 Special Operations to finish off the Afghan plan, work on other places like Yemen, which is such a beautiful and lovely country and so friendly and nice. And then we started working on the plan for removing Mr. Hussein and started recruiting regime exiles and putting that plan together and executing that plan and going to Iraq to help stand up post-regime change government. So that's how I ended up in the Pentagon. That's how I ended up in the Pentagon. Wow. There's another part of the book that you describe a chance encounter with someone, whether it's chance or not is another issue, but on your way to London, and I remember listening to this, you discussing sitting at dinner and a strange encounter there, which I guess further made you think of what was happening. Do you wanna explain that to the viewers? Thank you, Peter. Yeah, this was October, first few days of October, six, seven, eight, nine, that area. And I was in, I was going to London for a Five Eyes meeting on information sharing. I was the American senior official to the Five Eyes information sharing, the five English speaking countries. On the plane, I saw somebody who had worked for years. He was a very senior FBI official, had retired. We chit chatted a bit on the plane and didn't quite understand what he was doing in London. But a few nights later. Dinner, totally unrelated to the Five Eyes meeting, a common friend of ours had been in London and was giving a dinner. And at the dinner, my call, my retired senior law enforcement colleague, we all stand up and kind of sing for our supper and tell what are we, what is it we're passionate about? And he had an absolute meltdown. Remember, this is 30 days out from the election, and an absolute meltdown about Trump. And we're going to prove that Trump is a Russian asset, which later, when he gave classified testimony to Adam Schiff and it was revealed, he totally said, we have nothing, we have nothing on Trump. So he, when he was, when he rose his right, when he gave, took an oath and was giving testimony, he said, we have nothing, we have nothing. But in this public thing, he says, we're going to prove Trump is a Russian asset. And I go, this is, this is insane. Well, I've never seen him so just crazed like this. And I'm looking around the room, you know, people are probably globalist elites and they're all going fine, because they're saying, oh, come on, Hillary's going to clean up the floor with this Trump guy. It's going to be a knockout. I go, this is crazy. This is crazy. 30 days before the election. And if you do the forensics, and I did the forensics later because I gave a large statement on this to the Durham investigation, is when I did the forensics, he was a good friend of Comey, I knew that he was a good friend of Comey. The only reason he would have been in London was to talk to chief of station. That's an American term for the senior CIA official, Chief of Station. Gina Haspel, Gina Haspel to finalize the Fusion GPS story, which was later proven to be fake. Everybody lied about it. It was stunning. And I'm going, what am I witnessing? Somebody I trust. I've been at many meetings at the White House, many meetings sitting across the table as we introduced the mass surveillance system from 2007-2014 and the Comprehensive National Cyber Security Initiative. And that was a good idea at the time. We're going to target bad people, terrorists. What could possibly go wrong? And I want to get on the Trump side. And you made one step from Cruz to Trump. I was Carson Cruz Trump, so I took another step on. But at the beginning, in the first part, you have a chapter simply entitled, What is the Deep State? And we have touched on this just once before, actually, in many interviews, only once with Alex Newman, and he's coming out from a commentator's point of view, but you're coming out of from someone who's served in the military. So a different aspect. So maybe you can explain, this is a term which I guess is, more familiar to our US audience and maybe our UK audience and is often, disparaged, dismissed and ridiculed, mocked and thrown out by the media, which makes you wonder when the media are throwing something out and dismissing something that makes you wonder why they are dismissive so quickly. But the deep state, maybe take a while and introduce what is actually the Deep State. Well, I think you can break the deep state down to three basic components. The first are the technocrats, and these are the senior ranking officials that kind of float in and out of government at the, as we're finding out, the fifth, I call it the fifth branch of government, the non-profits in America. They go to the think tanks. I'm all for think tanks. I'm all for, but I'm for transparency and accountability. I'm all for think tanks, but they float into university. I'm a college professor, university professor myself and do a graduate course. I'm all for that, but, they kind of float in and out. These are the Fauci's. These are the Fauci's. Now Fauci actually never left government. He was literally the highest paid bureaucrat in the US government, But he was not just a simple bureaucrat. He was a very senior technocrat that were, these are the ones that are the high priests of what is truth and what is the narrative. And they cannot be questioned or you will be blacklisted. You'll be side-lined if you dare question the technocrats. But then there's the bureaucrats. Those are the careerists. They can be uniformed military. They can be civilians, and I've been both. You take an oath in office of both, in uniform or as a civilian in the US government. But these are the bureaucrats that are beholden to the idea of no matter what the question is, the answer is government and more government. Doesn't matter what the question is, The answer is a government program. So you've got the technocrats, the bureaucrats, and then you've got the plutocrats. And these are the wealthy. Many of them dominate big tech. Nothing wrong with being wealthy. Nothing wrong with that at all, as long as it was properly and legally accrued. But they have immense wealth. And as we saw with, you know, with big tech, you know, Elon Musk, you know, Facebook, Amazon, Jeff Bezos, all these, you know, they have immense power in America. You also have the venture capitalists that, you know, we're finding out and I've been to many of them, There's Anne Greeson Horowitz, Kleiner Perkins, Sequoia, etc. on Sand Hill Road in Silicon Valley. So these plutocrats have immense wealth, nothing wrong with being wealthy, but they have undue influence and access because of that wealth. So those are the three major components of the deep state. And I guess the deep state had no intention, the media had no intention, the establishment had no intention of Trump actually winning that election. And that changed the whole game. Suddenly someone was in the White House that was not part of the plan in whichever way you want to take that. Tell us about that because you talk about that the forces that are there that really were opposing Trump at every step. Yeah, absolutely. Government has grown out of control and there are those in government say they're conservative, they're not conservative, most of them, they're beholden to government and big government and all powerful government, but in early 2016, we started suddenly these meetings started happening where the Russians are meddling in the election again. Okay, well, interesting. And the cyber response group was a group that I was one of the original members of going back 2008, 2009. Because of several reasons, I would say I was eased out of that group. And these tremors and indicators were coming from the cyber response group. So in these very classified meetings, we start, several people start going, tee hee, tee hee, It's the Russians again, and they're very interested in this Trump guy. Very interested, and a lot of this is coming from our Five Eyes partners, because if you understand the American process of intelligence collection, we have very, what are supposed to be strict controls, but an end around that existed. It was not normally used, but used was when one of your Five Eyes partners would come up to the operations table, because at most of these, these operations centers, you normally have your five eyes partners who are, who are there right with you. So you got a Brit, you got, Canadian, and an Australian and, and maybe 25% of a New Zealander, because they have to cover everything. So... You know, you know, it too well. So, and it's a wonderful partnership and it's a good partnership, but it's part of the basis for what spun out of control. So they could, you could come up and it's called, it's called a table drop where one of your partners, and this can be used in several situations, but you know, your back is turned, you know, you're at the, you're at the centre table on the watch floor. Of your Five Eyes partners walks up, you turn around, you turn back, and there's a piece of paper on the table. And it's like, ooh, what is that? Ooh, this is good. Ooh, it's very interesting. And, oh, it didn't come from us. So I don't have to worry if there is an American national in this collection because it didn't come from us. It didn't come from us. It came from one of our partners. So there was that aspect, because there was all these inferences that all of this was coming from our Five Eyes partners, that Trump was mocked and pilloried for daring to say, because remember, he brought that up. And everybody's, oh, come on, come on. What are you talking about? No, no, that's exactly what happened. That's exactly what happened. So a few days after the election, I was called by one of my careerist colleagues on the classified, the top secret phones, and John, you have got to be involved in this. We're standing up an interagency committee to finalize the Russian narrative and delay or block Trump's first inauguration. I said, I just, I just, as soon as I sung up the phone, I just put my head in my hands on my desk. I said, I cannot believe this is going on. The simple short story is we ran the asset, but I'm a careerist. I took an oath of office. If Trump is a Russian asset, I want to know about it. So the bottom line, November, December of 2016, we spun up. The outcome was there were no dinosaurs in this dinosaur park. There was no information. So, so this is what, this is one of the, we have Intel community assessments. I've been involved in a number, national intelligence estimates. That's why we're spending $80 billion a year on the US intelligence community. And that's an unclassified number that it's released. It's right on the DNI website. And in this, there was no information. So in my write-up, because when that process, the package comes back to the departments and agencies, I write an action memo for the Secretary of Defense, who was Ash Carter, he's now dead. And I said, sir, my recommendation is not concur. There is no information that shows that Trump is a Russian asset. Even though the executive summary said Trump is a Russian asset, if you look in the body, there's nothing. We got nothing. And I was told John, stand down, cease and desist. Ash already signed his Comey and Brennan are personally hands on keyboard typing this very brief document. Which came out it's not the unclassified version is on the DNI website but if there's very little difference between these classified and top secret versions, its like what's the difference why do we even have two versions. And they Oh, John, John, you don't understand we said, small dog, but in the public version, we said puppy, all the difference in the world. Okay, I said, This is utterly ridiculous. But so you never get a director of CIA, or FBI, personally typing these memos, that's what you have a staff for. And so this was a total coup before to try and prevent block Trump from even getting into office, but that the war never ceased and never stopped to this day. John, I want to get on to the second book coming out. When you do anything with, I guess, the War Room Posse, having Stephen K. Bannon writing the intro, it becomes bigger and is part of a series now. But I want to, as a Christian, I'm intrigued by someone who talks about their faith as quite central, and listening to that, that came across, and it's, I guess, a balance against the deep state that wants to remove that and provide its own truth and security. But you talk about your Christian faith as providing, I guess, a foundation, a confidence, a certainty for you personally. How has that played, what importance has that played, I guess, in your career in the military and what you're doing now? Well, we want to be, we live in this world as Christians, but we should not conform or be part of this world. Man, which includes man and woman, is imperfect and fallen, and we have to always realize that, but the secularist, those who want to drive God out of the public discussion are, it's all about me. It's about me, me, me, and we're perfect. We have, It is this presumption, and it's faulty, that we have ultimate knowledge of everything, and we are masters of our situation. We aren't. We aren't. And being a saved believer in Christ gives you what I call a known starting point in life, whether you're talking about position, navigation, or timing, or you're talking about life, it's a known starting point, and it sets you out differently. And I'll just give you a little vignette of why we should be different and just not fall into what is the trend of the day? Is it the cult of transgenderism? Is it this? Is it that? No, no, the book, Bible, King James Version, that's what I read, it's enduring, it transcends time, almost said the wrong word there, transcends time. And no matter what, it gives you a known starting point. And in the business of government or the business of business, in life, you're going to be have a lot of questionable situations, you're going to be put in whether you like it or not. And having a moral compass, that known starting point is a foundation, but a quick vignette. I used to have to travel with this Japanese general. And one time, he came up to me, and we were getting ready to go out on the day together to do some things. And he comes up to me. John, something is different about you, you're different, why are you different? And I said, well, sir, I looked around, I go, I just didn't expect this, I said, sir, I'm a saved believer in Christ, and I'd like to share that message with you of his plan of salvation. He was like, but it was an honour, this Japanese general, he'd seen something different in me. And I really appreciate that, respected it, and hopefully I was a good witness for Christ in that situation. I've stayed in contact with him and hopefully planted that seed. So that's where I think it's very important, Peter. John, thanks for sharing your faith story. As I said, it's always fascinating. And as I said before, what you started out, you may not have intended to be serious, I have no idea. I know that Worm has a habit of making things bigger and grander and growing things. And you're, the second book coming out, War Against the Deep State. When is this coming out? It's available for pre-order now on thenationwillfollow.com. Should be out in the fall here, September, October time period, and it's a great follow-up book that gives, talks about several things. One of the big messages in The Nation Will Follow is in the American governance system, it's all about action, action, action at the county level. We have roughly 3,300 counties in America and county equivalents, a city can be a county. And it's all about government. It's all about the foundation of our governance. And if anybody is not happy with the way things are going in the swamp in D.C., the swamp in D.C. and the elite stand upon the shoulders of the nanny staters at the county level. What the left has done in America is, over 50 years, they've taken over the seven common centres of gravity in America and our county. It's the school board, county council, election board, registrar, judges, sheriffs, and prosecutors. We have to take those back. We've lost them over 50 years. In book two, we go into greater detail on that. We give some good success stories. We also talk about the foundations of the surveillance state, which I was one of the creators of, unfortunately, in the 2007 to 2014. So more-  That's something that fascinates me because we have now seen live facial recognition across London, across the UK, widened out, and a huge abuse of, so we have the online safety bill coming in the UK, which will bring in the most, the biggest control, I guess, of what is said online. And I know that a number of, I know that Wikipedia, Signal, a number of others said they'll have to pull out of the UK. But talk to us about that mass surveillance state because that seems to be where we are going as a society. Well, in the book, Ordinance of the Deep State, I give the genesis and foundation of mass surveillance. And it was really, as the war on terror started, we realized we need to be better on scale. And now I've learned to be very careful about that word scale, globalists and elites and deep staters love the word scale, because they want to always control on scale. But yeah, tracking, hacking, individual cell phone is one thing or an individual computer is one thing. Doing it in an enduring manner on a mass scale is something very different. And you have to automate, you have to do it, use artificial intelligence, you can't just use throw more humans at the problem. So you have to create these structures. The foundation was the Comprehensive National Cybersecurity Initiative started during the, toward the end of the Bush period, Obama came on board, they did a review, they liked it, they loved it, they wanted more of it, so they poured gas on it. And it exploded because it's almost intoxicating to the policy person, to the senior official. And the question is not, it was not, it was no longer can we, the question should have been should we, because it got out of control. It just, it became, when you see the mass scale that is capable, that is possible, Everybody just, just goes bonkers they lose their minds they said yeah, it's you could get anything you want in split seconds and believe me, people don't understand this until we've actually sat in the, one of the control centres at one of the intelligence communities or five eyes partners and see what what what I mean by that because it's it's breath-taking what can be had, we see Hollywood versions. But a lot of this stuff is, and sometimes is even better, and it becomes dangerous because it starts to establish a mastery of government over the citizen. In the American system, definitely, the people are the owners of the government, not the other way around. But if you're one of the elite, going in and out of government, think tanks, universities, You don't worry about what the common folks say. It's irrelevant, because they're too stupid. And that's been said. I've seen that at the White House. I've heard that said at the White House on both the Bush and the Obama era. A citizen is too stupid to know what they want, yet we're going to decide for them. Verbatim, that's been said. And that's bad. That is really dangerous. Because then you start the pathway down to socialism, totalitarianism, communism, and that's dangerous. So these are tools and the campuses out in the Virginia countryside that have now been established are derived from that program. Actually, I managed, I was the DOD senior lead for that and I had budget oversight over immense amount of money. And a lot of those campuses out on the Virginia countryside were born from that program. And so no longer do we have your old school CIA operative trying to buy off somebody in some remote country. I mean, that's dangerous. It's dirty. You don't get to see the kids and family at night. So why don't you just do it remotely and do it remotely. But it also became exciting because, what, who cares about what's going overseas. What about domestically? Why don't we just use it to start unmasking those Americans and expose what those Americans are saying in these intercepts? We're supposed to be focused on the foreign threat. No, no, no, we don't care about the foreign threat. We want to know who's opposing Obamacare? Who's opposing the growth of government? Who doesn't agree with us? And we just had an incredibly important court order. I'm number 862 on the Twitter top 10,000 of those silenced by Twitter, you know, and we just had an incredible court finding where a federal judge in Louisiana said, hold on federal government. You can't collude with big tech. You are not allowed to collude with big tech on this. He goes, I don't, this is wrong. You cannot do this. We knew, everybody knew about this. We knew about this. We knew about this. And, you know, and Merrick Garland's Department of Justice, instead of saying, you're right, judge, we shouldn't collude with big tech to spy on American citizens. Merrick Garland is, and just got overruled, introduced a petition to, you know, stay that judge's ruling. Why? Because DHS CISA on Glebe Road wants to continue what they call the customer access portal, where government officials can directly reach into big tech and social media and identify and throttle American citizens. And again, that's very important for me. I have a legal team working on a filing. This was a huge, huge finding for this judge to, to, to cease this program and we need to know the truth. And who's leading this right now? Jenny Silly. Jenny Silly, retired Army O5 from, spent a lot of time at Fort Meade, very close to Keith Alexander, the former director of NSA and, and Cyber Command. And she was one of the ones I worked on in the early days of the CNCI. And she's upset, Biden's upset that they can't collude with big tech to silence America. Ladies and gentlemen, we got to fight. We got to fight and we got to bring down the deep state because they will, they will destroy every one of us. And I know that, although I watched it closely, and I know you talk about that, the cancer of big government and that big tech collusion. Maybe I could ask you about the Durham report, because obviously many of those in position of power have done all they can do. They failed to keep Trump out in 2016, but they've done all they can do to try and discredit him. And that's been part of the Durham report. Do you want to just let us know how that has transpired? What kind of has been the outcome of that?  Well, I gave a number of statements. I had to update them as more truth was revealed to the Durham investigation. And I know we didn't get a slam dunk home run or whatever the British sports appropriate British sports term is. We didn't get a, yeah, I know Steve Bannon and others, I mean, I wasn't totally happy, but there were many good things that came out. Now, first of all, I'd say the mere fact that Durham was able to release a report, if you, understand the deepest part of the deep state is the Department of Justice and the Department to Justice front office. I worked with them closely during the Trump years and getting anything out of the DOJ front office was a miracle. Because they hated Trump and they were totally undermining Barr, even though Barr was in the end the best anyway either, but they were totally undermining Barr, everything. So the mere fact that he got it out was incredible. The second thing was he also, It was a horrific indictment, informal indictment of the entire federal law enforcement and intelligence community. The third, I would say, now I think this was part of the negotiation between Bulldog Durham and Garland to get the report out is, yeah, you've got this FBI retired guy McGonigal, the senior executive, he's been arrested, indicted for taking payoffs from the Russians, but we're not gonna call it part of the Durham report. We're just gonna announce it, it's gonna be separate, and we're not gonna connect it to the Durham report. Very likely information I gave at Durham led to McGonigal, and for everybody's reference, Charles McGonigal in 2015, 2016 was the senior FBI official in charge of counterintelligence in the FBI field office, the largest FBI field office. And so here's the guy who's supposed to be investigating Russia interference in the election, Russia penetration of the Trump campaign, and he retires and is arrested for what? Unlawfully working for the Russians. Now, of course, the pious elitist would say, oh, but he was retired. It has nothing to do with his government service. Oh, come on. These things just don't come out of thin air. Those tentacles of him working for the Russians go back years, years before he retired. So it was a huge finding. The guy who was supposed to be the trusted FBI chief in charge of Russia, Russia, Russia, has been arrested. His whole life is a mess now. He's going to prison, I guarantee that. And he's been arrested for working for the Russians. So that was huge. Now there's also five in, they're called criminal referrals, oftentimes just simplified to referrals. You never, I didn't get through 35 plus years of government service never being charged or indicted without understanding intimately the traps and the unforced errors of the environment, but you never want your name to be associated with a referral. That is known as a bad thing. Five criminal referrals are on page 11 of Durham. Well, three of those five sure sound an awful lot like information that I gave to the Durham investigation. So not a home run, maybe not even a triple, but there was good things that came out of the Durham report and these things take time. It's not over yet and we got to just keep on fighting and swinging. And as somebody from England said, never ever, ever, ever give up, never, ever surrender. Absolutely. Colonel Retired John Mills, I so appreciate you coming on. As I said, I thoroughly enjoyed listening to the book. If I can just bring it up once again to encourage, whether you're US, UK, Europe, you can get a hold of it either as a physical book or as an audiobook and then part two, the next part of the series is coming very soon. John said the fall for American viewers, autumn for UK viewers. It is coming soon, but do get a copy. You'll really enjoy reading, understanding what lies behind a lot of what we are seeing and it will educate you massively.  So John, I appreciate you coming on. Thank you so much for your time today. Peter, thank you so much. Honoured to be on with you, all my UK brothers and sisters and all freedom-loving people in Europe. Thank you so much, Peter.

GUEST OVERVIEW: Lee Stranahan is an American journalist who has written for such diverse publications as Huffington Post as a featured columnist and for Breitbart News as the lead investigative reporter. Lee has also been featured in films including Stephen K. Bannon's Occupy Unmasked and the Oliver Stone production Revealing Ukraine. Prior to his work in journalism, Lee had a successful career as a producer, visual effects artist and teacher in television and film production. Twitter: https://twitter.com/stranahan

An exhilarating and uncensored account of the maverick tech titan's wild life, a breakneck journey from Silicon Valley to his sudden, mysterious death in a Barcelona prison.“John McAfee is an American original—bold, brilliant, unpredictable. Characters like him came from a different era—not the woke, soy boy, non-confrontational culture of modern high tech. You meet McAfee head on in No Domain—in his raw energy and spit-in-your-eye cussedness. Buy this book, read this book, and understand—could anything, even John McAfee, kill John McAfee?” —Stephen K. Bannon, White House Chief Strategist, Host: War RoomDelete everything you think you know about tech pioneer John McAfee, whose antivirus software operates on millions of computers around the world. Uninstall any impressions you have of the man depicted in the news, the man in disguise and on the run in Central America, even the man who reinvented himself as the Libertarian Party's candidate in the 2016 presidential election. Move these images to your brain's trash file. The real John McAfee is far more complex.Drawn from hours of conversations between Mark Eglinton and John McAfee in 2019—while he was hiding in an undisclosed location—No Domain: The John McAfee Tapes provides startling insight into the extraordinary life of one of America's genuine renegades. McAfee shares his life story like it's his last will and testament, providing revelatory details on the abusive father who shot himself when John was a young boy; the life-changing LSD overdose in St Louis, during which he was nearly convinced by voices in his head to try to kill his first wife and daughter; the unexpected government clearance that led to him working on CIA dark programs; the combined affinity for mathematics and hallucinogens that informed the hedonistic nature of his software company in Silicon Valley; the attempt to find a quiet life in Belize only to become a pariah in the eyes of the local militia, from whom he'd later flee, having been framed for the murder of his neighbor; and the subsequent years on the run in the US, evading a cast of pursuers, including the Sinaloa Cartel, while burying bags of money and valuables in marked locations around the Southwest, before fleeing the country on his yacht.John McAfee has lived a life that defies description. This larger-than-life biography documents it all.

For this special episode of The Manhood Hour, Sebastian talks to Stephen K. Bannon about his greatest influence, why it's so difficult to raise a boy in today's society, and how humanity as we know it could be permanently changed by the advent of A.I.Support the show: https://www.sebgorka.com/See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Hour 1 Guest: Lewis County Sheriff Michael Carpinelli! * We Discuss the general role of sheriffs in elections – election law isn't the same in every state. * Role of sheriffs as CLEOs to protect chain of custody security once early voting ends for those ballots to be transferred to Central Counting as well as transferring precinct ballot sticks (flash drives) to Central Count after the polls close on Election Day. * Role of sheriff with regard to poll watchers (how to stop them from being obstructed) * We understand DOJ federal agents plan to show up at Central Counting on Election Day. Since they have no authority to oversee or be involved in the election process, how to handle? * Since the Posse is the power of the county, Sheriffs can bring in posse to support as security? In what capacity? * Sheriffs can deputize poll watchers and if Feds are operating outside the law, they can escort them out. Feds have no authority to usurp or obstruct poll watchers * Can Sheriffs' posse or deputies be appointed by the sheriff to be official poll watchers? * Get CSPOA SMS Updates! Simply text the letters CSPOA to 53445. * Archives of the Simulcast of the Sheriff Mack show and Liberty RoundTable Live can be found in Video at BrightEON.tv and Audio at LibertyRoundTable.com Hour 2 * Ye Claims Fentanyl, Not Chauvin, Killed George Floyd! * George Floyd's family is openly considering a potential lawsuit against Kanye West and Candace Owens. * Civil rights attorney Lee Merritt has acknowledged he cannot file a defamation lawsuit against West because Floyd is deceased, but he remains dedicated to finding a legal avenue to penalize West for his statements about Floyd. * Conservative Radio's Battleground Blitz. * the conservative personalities Eric Metaxas, Sebastian Gorka and Charlie Kirk have used their nationally syndicated radio shows to discuss rigged voting machines, highlight election officials involved in corruption and espouse ballot fraud. * Now, the three men are joining a live speaking tour that will take them across Arizona, Georgia, Pennsylvania and other battleground states to promote those views — and Republican candidates — ahead of the Nov. 8 midterm elections. The radio hosts and their tour are united by a common backer: Salem Media Group, a publicly traded media company in Irving, Texas. * In 2006, Salem bought the conservative political website Townhall.com; other deals for conservative sites followed, including HotAir, Twitchy and PJ Media. * Newly released documentary footage shows Nancy Pelosi threatening to “punch” Donald Trump as “Stop the Steal” rally protesters approached the US Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. Pelosi's daughter, Alexandra, filmed the documentary in the lead up to and duration of the Capitol riot. I've been waiting for this. For trespassing on the Capitol grounds. I want to punch him out, and I'm gonna go to jail, and I'm gonna be happy. * Justice Dept. Recommends 6 Months for Stephen K. Bannon. * Trump Hotels Billed Government $1,185 for Secret Service Rooms forcing a federal agency to pay well above government rates. --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/loving-liberty/support

* Ye Claims Fentanyl, Not Chauvin, Killed George Floyd! * George Floyd's family is openly considering a potential lawsuit against Kanye West and Candace Owens. * Civil rights attorney Lee Merritt has acknowledged he cannot file a defamation lawsuit against West because Floyd is deceased, but he remains dedicated to finding a legal avenue to penalize West for his statements about Floyd. * Conservative Radio's Battleground Blitz. * the conservative personalities Eric Metaxas, Sebastian Gorka and Charlie Kirk have used their nationally syndicated radio shows to discuss rigged voting machines, highlight election officials involved in corruption and espouse ballot fraud. * Now, the three men are joining a live speaking tour that will take them across Arizona, Georgia, Pennsylvania and other battleground states to promote those views -- and Republican candidates -- ahead of the Nov. 8 midterm elections. The radio hosts and their tour are united by a common backer: Salem Media Group, a publicly traded media company in Irving, Texas. * In 2006, Salem bought the conservative political website Townhall.com; other deals for conservative sites followed, including HotAir, Twitchy and PJ Media. * Newly released documentary footage shows Nancy Pelosi threatening to "punch" Donald Trump as "Stop the Steal" rally protesters approached the US Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. Pelosi's daughter, Alexandra, filmed the documentary in the lead up to and duration of the Capitol riot. I've been waiting for this. For trespassing on the Capitol grounds. I want to punch him out, and I'm gonna go to jail, and I'm gonna be happy. * Justice Dept. Recommends 6 Months for Stephen K. Bannon. * Trump Hotels Billed Government $1,185 for Secret Service Rooms forcing a federal agency to pay well above government rates.

Hour 1 * Guest: Dr. Scott Bradley, * To Preserve the Nation: In the Tradition of the Founding Fathers – FreedomsRisingSun.com * Tucker is a Russian dupe. So is Stephen K. Bannon, They refuse to condemn Russia's invasion of Ukraine, Don't be fooled! – Cliff Kincaid, USASurvival.org * Remember that Russia invaded under Obama and then under Biden. Not under Trump. * We suggest you read Trevor Loudon's KeyWiki analysis of Gabbard's career. She's a far-left Democrat. She may no longer be a Democrat. But she's still far-left. Hour 2 * Guest: Dr. Sherry Peel Jackson, a retired Certified Public Accountant, Certified Fraud Examiner and former IRS agent with over 35 years of experience in public, private and governmental accounting – WakeThePeople.com * Sherry is a financial and business strategist who conducts basic and advanced financial education seminars across the United States. * Jackson also consults with businesses and individuals in the areas of IRS audit preparation, wealth creation, debt elimination and overall financial literacy. * How much should the IRS pay Sam Bushman for Lies, for creating a ‘living hell' of harassment and intimidation for more 35 years? * Please see Sherry speak, Attend RED PILL EXPO Salt Lake City, Utah, November 12 – 13 – RedPillExpo.org * Should we send a million postcards to the IRS every day until they are abolished? * You must decide what your financial future will look like or someone else will decide for you. --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/loving-liberty/support

* Guest: Dr. Scott Bradley, * To Preserve the Nation: In the Tradition of the Founding Fathers - FreedomsRisingSun.com * Tucker is a Russian dupe. So is Stephen K. Bannon, They refuse to condemn Russia's invasion of Ukraine, Don't be fooled! - Cliff Kincaid, USASurvival.org * Remember that Russia invaded under Obama and then under Biden. Not under Trump. * We suggest you read Trevor Loudon's KeyWiki analysis of Gabbard's career. She's a far-left Democrat. She may no longer be a Democrat. But she's still far-left.

We discuss Japan, Alaska rally, energy crisis, and more.  Our Guests Are: Steve Cortes, Boris Epshteyn, Matt Schlapp, Jordan Conradson Stay ahead of the censors - Join us warroom.org/join Aired On: 7/08/2022 Watch: On the Web: http://www.warroom.org On Gettr: @WarRoom On Podcast: http://warroom.ctcin.bio On TV: PlutoTV Channel 240, Dish Channel 219, Roku, Apple TV, FireTV or on https://AmericasVoice.news. #news #politics #realnews 

We discuss Japan, Alaska rally, energy crisis, and more.  Our Guests Are: Steve Cortes, Boris Epshteyn, Matt Schlapp, Jordan Conradson Stay ahead of the censors - Join us warroom.org/join Aired On: 7/08/2022 Watch: On the Web: http://www.warroom.org On Gettr: @WarRoom On Podcast: http://warroom.ctcin.bio On TV: PlutoTV Channel 240, Dish Channel 219, Roku, Apple TV, FireTV or on https://AmericasVoice.news. #news #politics #realnews 

An exhilarating and uncensored account of the maverick tech titan's wild life, a breakneck journey from Silicon Valley to his sudden, mysterious death in a Barcelona prison. “This is the only possible book that could have been written about John McAfee.” —Stephen L. Miller, Washington Examiner “John McAfee is an American original—bold, brilliant, unpredictable. Characters like him came from a different era—not the woke, soy boy, non-confrontational culture of modern high tech. You meet McAfee head on in No Domain—in his raw energy and spit-in-your-eye cussedness. Buy this book, read this book, and understand—could anything, even John McAfee, kill John McAfee?” —Stephen K. Bannon, White House Chief Strategist, Host: War Room Delete everything you think you know about tech pioneer John McAfee, whose antivirus software operates on millions of computers around the world. Uninstall any impressions you have of the man depicted in the news, the man in disguise and on the run in Central America, even the man who reinvented himself as the Libertarian Party's candidate in the 2016 presidential election. Move these images to your brain's trash file. The real John McAfee is far more complex. Drawn from hours of conversations between Mark Eglinton and John McAfee in 2019—while he was hiding in an undisclosed location—No Domain: The John McAfee Tapes provides startling insight into the extraordinary life of one of America's genuine renegades. McAfee shares his life story like it's his last will and testament, providing revelatory details on the abusive father who shot himself when John was a young boy; the life-changing LSD overdose in St Louis, during which he was nearly convinced by voices in his head to try to kill his first wife and daughter; the unexpected government clearance that led to him working on CIA dark programs; the combined affinity for mathematics and hallucinogens that informed the hedonistic nature of his software company in Silicon Valley; the attempt to find a quiet life in Belize only to become a pariah in the eyes of the local militia, from whom he'd later flee, having been framed for the murder of his neighbor; and the subsequent years on the run in the US, evading a cast of pursuers, including the Sinaloa Cartel, while burying bags of money and valuables in marked locations around the Southwest, before fleeing the country on his yacht. John McAfee has lived a life that defies description. This larger-than-life biography documents it all.

An exhilarating and uncensored account of the maverick tech titan's wild life, a breakneck journey from Silicon Valley to his sudden, mysterious death in a Barcelona prison. “This is the only possible book that could have been written about John McAfee.” —Stephen L. Miller, Washington Examiner “John McAfee is an American original—bold, brilliant, unpredictable. Characters like him came from a different era—not the woke, soy boy, non-confrontational culture of modern high tech. You meet McAfee head on in No Domain—in his raw energy and spit-in-your-eye cussedness. Buy this book, read this book, and understand—could anything, even John McAfee, kill John McAfee?” —Stephen K. Bannon, White House Chief Strategist, Host: War Room Delete everything you think you know about tech pioneer John McAfee, whose antivirus software operates on millions of computers around the world. Uninstall any impressions you have of the man depicted in the news, the man in disguise and on the run in Central America, even the man who reinvented himself as the Libertarian Party's candidate in the 2016 presidential election. Move these images to your brain's trash file. The real John McAfee is far more complex. Drawn from hours of conversations between Mark Eglinton and John McAfee in 2019—while he was hiding in an undisclosed location—No Domain: The John McAfee Tapes provides startling insight into the extraordinary life of one of America's genuine renegades. McAfee shares his life story like it's his last will and testament, providing revelatory details on the abusive father who shot himself when John was a young boy; the life-changing LSD overdose in St Louis, during which he was nearly convinced by voices in his head to try to kill his first wife and daughter; the unexpected government clearance that led to him working on CIA dark programs; the combined affinity for mathematics and hallucinogens that informed the hedonistic nature of his software company in Silicon Valley; the attempt to find a quiet life in Belize only to become a pariah in the eyes of the local militia, from whom he'd later flee, having been framed for the murder of his neighbor; and the subsequent years on the run in the US, evading a cast of pursuers, including the Sinaloa Cartel, while burying bags of money and valuables in marked locations around the Southwest, before fleeing the country on his yacht. John McAfee has lived a life that defies description. This larger-than-life biography documents it all.

After refusing to comply with the unconstitutional January 6th Committee witch hunt, the trial of Donald Trump's former Chief Strategist, Stephen K. Bannon, is set to commence on July 18, 2022. Two American military volunteers were captured by Russian forces in Ukraine. President Joe Biden has not commented, but rather, has pledged another $1 billion to Ukraine in military aid. Miami is holding ‘Guns for Ukraine', a firearm buyback program intended to send Americans' firearms to Ukraine as they fight against the communist invasion of Russia. In return, Americans receive a $50-$150 gift card. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is set to discipline the Border Patrol agents accused in the Haitian migrant ‘whipping' incident at the US-Mexico border, despite the photographer's testimony that there was no abusive behavior taking place. Here's your Daily dose of Human Events with @JackPosobiec Save up to 65% on MyPillow products by going to MyPillow.com/POSO and use code POSO To get $150 off each 3-month supply of ‘My Patriot Supply' go to PrepareWithPOSO.com and use promo code POSO 

In today's 50th episode of "Moment of Truth," Saurabh and Nick sit down with Stephen K. Bannon, a former U.S. Naval Officer, investment banker, Chief Strategist to President Trump, and now host of "War Room: Pandemic," to discuss Russia's War against Ukraine, rising tensions between the U.S. and the Chinese Communist Party, what it was like working in the White House and what the next President needs to do to counter the entrenched power of the Deep State.Stephen Kevin Bannon an officer in the United States Navy for seven years in the late 1970s and early 1980s. After his military service, he worked at Goldman Sachs as an investment banker, and left as vice president. In 1993, he became acting director of the research project Biosphere 2. In the 1990s, he became an executive producer in Hollywood, and produced 18 films between 1991 and 2016. In 2007, he co-founded Breitbart News. In August 2016, Bannon was named the chief executive officer of Trump's 2016 presidential bid. Following Trump's victory, Bannon was appointed Chief Strategist in the Trump administration.In October 2019, Bannon began co-hosting “War Room: Impeachment,” now called “War Room: Pandemic” a daily radio show and podcast that now has over 135million downloads, making it one of the most popular podcasts in America.Learn more about Stephen K. Bannon's work:https://warroom.org/https://rumble.com/c/BannonsWarRoom––––––Follow American Moment on Social Media:Twitter – https://twitter.com/AmMomentOrgFacebook – https://www.facebook.com/AmMomentOrgInstagram – https://www.instagram.com/ammomentorg/YouTube – https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC4qmB5DeiFxt53ZPZiW4TcgRumble – https://rumble.com/c/c-695775Check out AmCanon:https://www.americanmoment.org/amcanon/Follow Us on Twitter:Saurabh Sharma – https://twitter.com/ssharmaUSNick Solheim – https://twitter.com/NickSSolheimSubscribe to our Podcast, "Moment of Truth"Apple Podcasts – https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/moment-of-truth/id1555257529Spotify – https://open.spotify.com/show/5ATl0x7nKDX0vVoGrGNhAjiHeart Radio – https://www.iheart.com/podcast/269-moment-of-truth-77884750/ Our GDPR privacy policy was updated on August 8, 2022. Visit acast.com/privacy for more information.

An exhilarating and uncensored account of the maverick tech titan's wild life, a breakneck journey from Silicon Valley to his sudden, mysterious death in a Barcelona prison. “John McAfee is an American original—bold, brilliant, unpredictable. Characters like him came from a different era—not the woke, soy boy, non-confrontational culture of modern high tech. You meet McAfee head on in No Domain—in his raw energy and spit-in-your-eye cussedness. Buy this book, read this book, and understand—could anything, even John McAfee, kill John McAfee?” —Stephen K. Bannon, White House Chief Strategist, Host: War Room Delete everything you think you know about tech pioneer John McAfee, whose antivirus software operates on millions of computers around the world. Uninstall any impressions you have of the man depicted in the news, the man in disguise and on the run in Central America, even the man who reinvented himself as the Libertarian Party's candidate in the 2016 presidential election. Move these images to your brain's trash file. The real John McAfee is far more complex. Drawn from hours of conversations between Mark Eglinton and John McAfee in 2019—while he was hiding in an undisclosed location—No Domain: The John McAfee Tapes provides startling insight into the extraordinary life of one of America's genuine renegades. McAfee shares his life story like it's his last will and testament, providing revelatory details on the abusive father who shot himself when John was a young boy; the life-changing LSD overdose in St Louis, during which he was nearly convinced by voices in his head to try to kill his first wife and daughter; the unexpected government clearance that led to him working on CIA dark programs; the combined affinity for mathematics and hallucinogens that informed the hedonistic nature of his software company in Silicon Valley; the attempt to find a quiet life in Belize only to become a pariah in the eyes of the local militia, from whom he'd later flee, having been framed for the murder of his neighbor; and the subsequent years on the run in the US, evading a cast of pursuers, including the Sinaloa Cartel, while burying bags of money and valuables in marked locations around the Southwest, before fleeing the country on his yacht. John McAfee has lived a life that defies description. This larger-than-life biography documents it all.

An exhilarating and uncensored account of the maverick tech titan's wild life, a breakneck journey from Silicon Valley to his sudden, mysterious death in a Barcelona prison. “John McAfee is an American original—bold, brilliant, unpredictable. Characters like him came from a different era—not the woke, soy boy, non-confrontational culture of modern high tech. You meet McAfee head on in No Domain—in his raw energy and spit-in-your-eye cussedness. Buy this book, read this book, and understand—could anything, even John McAfee, kill John McAfee?” —Stephen K. Bannon, White House Chief Strategist, Host: War Room Delete everything you think you know about tech pioneer John McAfee, whose antivirus software operates on millions of computers around the world. Uninstall any impressions you have of the man depicted in the news, the man in disguise and on the run in Central America, even the man who reinvented himself as the Libertarian Party's candidate in the 2016 presidential election. Move these images to your brain's trash file. The real John McAfee is far more complex. Drawn from hours of conversations between Mark Eglinton and John McAfee in 2019—while he was hiding in an undisclosed location—No Domain: The John McAfee Tapes provides startling insight into the extraordinary life of one of America's genuine renegades. McAfee shares his life story like it's his last will and testament, providing revelatory details on the abusive father who shot himself when John was a young boy; the life-changing LSD overdose in St Louis, during which he was nearly convinced by voices in his head to try to kill his first wife and daughter; the unexpected government clearance that led to him working on CIA dark programs; the combined affinity for mathematics and hallucinogens that informed the hedonistic nature of his software company in Silicon Valley; the attempt to find a quiet life in Belize only to become a pariah in the eyes of the local militia, from whom he'd later flee, having been framed for the murder of his neighbor; and the subsequent years on the run in the US, evading a cast of pursuers, including the Sinaloa Cartel, while burying bags of money and valuables in marked locations around the Southwest, before fleeing the country on his yacht. John McAfee has lived a life that defies description. This larger-than-life biography documents it all.

“The great awakening with the great realignment is here,” said Stephen K. Bannon. Our guests are: Rogan O'Handley, Jack Francis, Bianca Gracia Stay ahead of the censors - Join us warroom.org/join Aired On: 06/07/2021 Watch: On the Web: http://www.warroom.org On Podcast: http://warroom.ctcin.bio On TV: PlutoTV Channel 240, Dish Channel 219, Roku, Apple TV, FireTV or on https://AmericasVoice.news. #news #politics #realnews

“They're positioning this…to try edge their way out,” said Stephen K. Bannon, after Collins did a softball interview with Hugh Hewitt. “Morning Joe is grasping how they throw Fauci under the bus, but also how they get out of their own culpability there.” Our guest is: Raheem Kassam Stay ahead of the censors - Join us warroom.org/join Aired On: 06/04/2021 Watch: On the Web: http://www.warroom.org On Podcast: http://warroom.ctcin.bio On TV: PlutoTV Channel 240, Dish Channel 219, Roku, Apple TV, FireTV or on https://AmericasVoice.news. #news #politics #realnews

“There's a shift underway, principally on the Wuhan lab and also the vote,” said Stephen K. Bannon. Our guests are: Dave Ramaswamy, Dr. Peter Navarro, Raheem Kassam, Matthew DePerno Stay ahead of the censors - Join us warroom.org/join Aired On: 05/08/2021 Watch: On the Web: http://www.warroomorg.wpengine.com On Podcast: http://warroom.ctcin.bio On TV: PlutoTV Channel 240, Dish Channel 219, Roku, Apple TV, FireTV or on https://AmericasVoice.news. #news #politics #realnews

The $200 million speculative real estate deal using funds meant for the poor, plus selling out to the Chinese Communist Party has Stephen K. Bannon pulling his hair out. Our guests are: Catharine O'Neill, Rudy Giuliani, Rabbi Spero, Liz Yore Stay ahead of the censors - Join us warroom.org/join Aired On: 04/15/2021 Watch: On the Web: http://www.pandemic.warroom.org On Podcast: http://warroom.ctcin.bio On TV: PlutoTV Channel 240, Dish Channel 219, Roku, Apple TV, FireTV or on https://AmericasVoice.news. #news #politics #realnews

“People of faith, they're starting with evangelical Christians,” said Stephen K. Bannon. “They're going to get to everybody.” Our guest is: Joe Hoft Stay ahead of the censors - Join us warroom.org/join Aired On: 04/06/2021 Watch: On the Web: http://www.pandemic.warroom.org On Podcast: http://warroom.ctcin.bio On TV: PlutoTV Channel 240, Dish Channel 219, Roku, Apple TV, FireTV or on https://AmericasVoice.news. #news #politics #realnews

“If the world doesn't have enough problems it's not young Christians gathering to worship,” said Stephen K. Bannon. Our guests are: Mark Finchem, John Fredericks, Sean Feucht, Tej Gill, Brian McCall, Bianca Gracia Stay ahead of the censors - Join us warroom.org/join Aired On: 04/01/2021 Watch: On the Web: http://www.pandemic.warroom.org On Podcast: http://warroom.ctcin.bio On TV: PlutoTV Channel 240, Dish Channel 219, Roku, Apple TV, FireTV or on https://AmericasVoice.news. #news #politics #realnews

Stephen K. Bannon goes through the real history of the early days of the pandemic and reveals Dr. Fauci to be, once again, a "stone cold liar." Our guests are: Joanna Miller, Mark Meadows, Rabbi Spero Stay ahead of the censors - Join us warroom.org/join Aired On: 03/29/2021 Watch: On the Web: http://www.pandemic.warroom.org On Podcast: http://warroom.ctcin.bio On TV: PlutoTV Channel 240, Dish Channel 219, Roku, Apple TV, FireTV or on https://AmericasVoice.news. #news #politics #realnews    

“I know they call him creepy Joe, but man what is he doing?” said Stephen K. Bannon. “It's bizarre.” Our guests are: Todd Bensman, Dr. Peter Navarro, Boris Epshteyn, John Fredericks Stay ahead of the censors - Join us warroom.org/join Aired On: 03/29/2021 Watch: On the Web: http://www.pandemic.warroom.org On Podcast: http://warroom.ctcin.bio On TV: PlutoTV Channel 240, Dish Channel 219, Roku, Apple TV, FireTV or on https://AmericasVoice.news. #news #politics #realnews

“Now I know where you've been hiding,” said Stephen K. Bannon. “You've been in the editing room.” Our guests are: Natalie Winters, Mike Lindell Stay ahead of the censors - Join us warroom.org/join Aired On: 03/26/2021 Watch: On the Web: http://www.pandemic.warroom.org On Podcast: http://warroom.ctcin.bio On TV: PlutoTV Channel 240, Dish Channel 219, Roku, Apple TV, FireTV or on https://AmericasVoice.news. #news #politics #realnews

“This is an absolute travesty,” says Stephen K. Bannon. “156 years ago when Abraham Lincoln gave the greatest speech in American political history…his second inaugural…and today we have the political theater, the theater of the absurd.” Our guests are: Michael Patrick Leahy, Rosemary Jenks Stay ahead of the censors - Join us warroom.org/join Aired On: 03/04/2021 Watch: On the Web: http://www.pandemic.warroom.org On Podcast: http://warroom.ctcin.bio On TV: PlutoTV Channel 240, Dish Channel 219, Roku, Apple TV, FireTV or on https://AmericasVoice.news. #news #politics #realnews

Stephen K. Bannon calls out “weakness double-talk” from Larry Kudlow and said it's imperative to confront the Chinese Communist Party. Our guests are: Matt Gaetz, John Fredericks, Matt Palumbo Stay ahead of the censors - Join us warroom.org/join Aired On: 02/25/2021 Watch: On the Web: http://www.pandemic.warroom.org On Podcast: http://warroom.ctcin.bio On TV: PlutoTV Channel 240, Dish Channel 219, Roku, Apple TV, FireTV or on https://AmericasVoice.news. #news #politics #realnews

“There's a deeper problem here,” said Stephen K. Bannon. “The Chinese are laughing at us.” Our guests are: Dr. Peter Navarro, Boris Epshteyn, Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai, Melissa Huray Stay ahead of the censors - Join us warroom.org/join Aired On: 02/18/2021 Watch: On the Web: http://www.pandemic.warroom.org On Podcast: http://warroom.ctcin.bio On TV: PlutoTV Channel 240, Dish Channel 219, Roku, Apple TV, FireTV or on https://AmericasVoice.news. #news #politics #realnews

“The problem here are not the folks in Wyoming, this is a McCarthy problem,” said Stephen K. Bannon. “This shows you your lack of leadership.” Our guests are: Jim Hoft, Joey Correnti IV, Mark Finchem, John Fredericks, Gad Saad Stay ahead of the censors - Join us warroom.org/join Aired On: 02/8/2021

Stephen K. Bannon explains the buried lead about herd immunity: the push for mandatory vaccinations for children. Our guests are: Cheryl Chumley, M.A. Taylor, Rudy Giuliani Stay ahead of the censors - Join us warroom.org/join Aired On: 02/3/2021

Stephen K. Bannon tells the Republicans to take advantage of the free play given to them by Sen. Rand Paul. Our guest is: Rep. Matt Gaetz Stay ahead of the censors - Join us warroom.org/join Aired On: 02/3/2021

Stephen K. Bannon says President Trump's lead impeachment lawyer is not going big enough, and must bring up election fraud.   Our Guests Are: Joey Correnti IV, Matt Braynard, Boris Epshteyn    Aired on 2/2/2021