Podcast appearances and mentions of Vanessa Schneider

-Durch ihre Rolle in "Der letzte Tango in Paris" (1972) von Bernardo Bertolucci wurde Maria Schneider mit 19 Jahren über Nacht zum Weltstar. An der Seite von Marlon Brando spielte sie eine junge Frau, die in einem Pariser Appartement animalischen Sex mit einem älteren Mann hat. "Der letzte Tango in Paris" wurde zum Skandalfilm. Doch die improvisierten Vergewaltigungsszenen prägten Maria Schneiders gesamtes Leben. Eigentlich wollte sie ihre Geschichte zusammen mit ihrer Cousine, der Journalistin Vanessa Schneider, erzählen. Nach Maria Schneiders Tod hat Vanessa Schneider das Buch nun allein geschrieben - unsere Literaturkritikerin Katharina Döbler hat es gelesen.

C dans l'air l'invitée du 25 décembre - Vanessa Schneider, grand reporter au Monde et co-auteure de "Successions : Secrets de famille" aux éditions Albin MichelRothschild, Dassault, Ricard… derrière ces noms prestigieux se cachent des histoires de famille où les pères sont impitoyables avec les fils et où les finances l'emportent sur l'affect. Deux ans après le premier volet, Vanessa Schneider et Raphaëlle Bacqué ont enquêté sur sept autres grandes familles qui dirigent l'économie française.Vanessa Schneider est notre invitée. Elle reviendra sur son travail sur les secrets des plus grands noms de l'industrie française.

Pour le deuxième tome de leur enquête "Successions", aux éditions Albin Michel, les journalistes dévoilent les secrets de famille des grandes fortunes françaises : Dassault, Saadé, Rothschild, Ricard, Leclerc, Wertheimer, Barrière... Ecoutez L'invité de 9h40 avec Amandine Bégot du 16 décembre 2024.

Grand reporter au journal Le Monde, essayiste et romancière, Vanessa Schneider est la nouvelle invitée du podcast de Lili Barbery. Dans ce nouvel épisode, elle nous raconte ce qui l'a poussée à naviguer du journalisme à la littérature et comment elle cultive sa créativité avec ses enquêtes au long cours, l'écriture de ses romans et les essais politiques. Comment écrire sur sa propre famille sans blesser les vivants ni déshonorer la mémoire des disparus? Comment faire d'un récit personnel une histoire universelle dans laquelle nous sommes si nombreux à nous reconnaitre. De son premier roman au deuxième volet de Successions qu'elle vient de co-signer avec la journaliste Raphaëlle Bacqué, Vanessa Schneider montre, dans cet épisode, son intérêt pour les héritages émotionnels que nous portons tous et qui ont tant besoin d'être identifiés pour libérer une lignée.La rencontre est précédée d'une courte méditation. Une production Les PodcasteursSuivez Vanessa Schneider sur Instagram Les ouvrages de Vanessa Schneider cités dans cet épisode : La mère de ma mère de Vanessa Schneider (Points)Tâche de ne pas devenir folle de Vanessa Schneider (Points)Le mauvais génie de Nicolas Sarkozy d'Ariane Chemin et Vanessa Schneider (Pluriel)L'homme qui voulait être aimé de Georges Kiejman et Vanessa Schneider (Poche)Tu t'appelais Maria Schneider de Vanessa Schneider (Poche)Successions de Raphaëlle Bacqué et Vanessa Schneider (Poche)Successions Saison 2 par Raphaëlle Bacqué et Vanessa Schneider (Albin Michel)Abonnez vous à la newsletter de Lili Barbery Suivez Lili Barbery sur InstagramAbonnez-vous à sa plateforme de cours en ligne Lili Barbery TV Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

L'émission 28 minutes du 18/11/2024 L'héritage chez les Dassault, Ricard ou Rothschild : contre bonne fortune mauvais cœur Raphaëlle Bacqué et Vanessa Schneider publient  "Successions — Secrets de famille", aux éditions Albin Michel. Après le grand succès de leur premier tome, "Successions : L'argent, le sang et les larmes", leur nouveau livre est consacré à la transmission du pouvoir au sein des grandes fortunes françaises. Dans leur deuxième volume, on retrouve les familles Dassault, Rothschild, Leclerc ou encore Ricard. Des familles dans lesquelles les enfants — souvent les fils — sont façonnés pour reprendre et diriger l'empire familial, mais tentent de s'émanciper de leur prédécesseur. Car passer le flambeau à son héritier lorsque l'on a créé un empire n'est pas une tâche facile, mais devoir assumer un tel héritage ne l'est pas non plus. "On y retrouve les rivalités et les incompréhensions qui existent dans toutes les familles", écrit Raphaëlle Bacqué… à un détail près : ici, les héritages se comptent en milliards.  1 000 jours de guerre Russie-Ukraine : dernières salves avant négociations ? La guerre entre l'Ukraine et la Russie entrera mercredi 20 novembre dans son millième jour. Presque trois ans après l'invasion russe le 24 février 2022 — qui avait signé le retour de la guerre sur le sol européen —  la fin du conflit apparaît comme un horizon possible. L'élection de Donald Trump a relancé les débats sur les négociations, le nouveau président américain ayant déclaré pouvoir résoudre le conflit en "24 heures". Mais en attendant sa prise de fonction le 20 janvier prochain, la guerre fait rage sur le plan militaire. Dimanche 17 novembre, la Russie a lancé une attaque aérienne d'ampleur sur l'Ukraine, qui a fait onze morts et une vingtaine de blessés, selon un bilan provisoire. La Russie a déclaré viser les “infrastructures énergétiques essentielles qui soutenaient le complexe militaro-industriel ukrainien”. Du côté américain, Joe Biden aurait autorisé l'Ukraine à utiliser des missiles à longue portée ATACMS pour viser des cibles militaires dans les profondeurs du territoire russe. Alors, les deux parties jouent-elles leur dernière partition avant de possibles négociations ?  Enfin, Xavier Mauduit dresse le portrait de Bela Karolyi, entraîneur emblématique de la gymnaste Nadia Comaneci, décédé à l'âge de 82 ans, et Marie Bonnisseau évoque la croissance du nombre d'abonnés du réseau social Bluesky.  28 Minutes est le magazine d'actualité d'ARTE, présenté par Elisabeth Quin du lundi au jeudi à 20h05. Renaud Dély est aux commandes de l'émission le vendredi et le samedi. Ce podcast est coproduit par KM et ARTE Radio. Enregistrement : 18 novembre 2024 - Présentation : Renaud Dély - Production : KM, ARTE Radio

Nos invités de la deuxième partie de C à Vous: Raphaëlle Bacqué et Vanessa Schneider pour le livre “Successions. Secrets de famille”, disponible jeudi chez Albin Michel. Romain Duris et Vincent Fichot, père victime d'un enlèvement parental, pour le film “Une part manquante” en salle le 13 novembre et Asphalt interprète en live le titre “Lame de fond”.Avec comme chaque soir également l'œil de Pierre, le "Pas vu pas pris" de Mohamed Bouhafsi, le bonus de Lorrain Sénéchal et bien entendu l'ABC de Bertrand Chameroy. Tous les soirs, du lundi au vendredi à 20h sur France 5, Anne-Elisabeth Lemoine et toute son équipe accueillent les personnalités et artistes qui font l'actualité.

C'est une saga journalistique et littéraire très attendue. Les lecteurs du Monde lisent régulièrement les histoires des grandes familles industrielles françaises sous l'angle de la succession, quand les pères passent la main à leurs enfants. ça donne quelquefois lieu à des batailles, des reniements, comme on peut le lire dans le volume 2 de "Succession" le livre de Raphaëlle Bacqué et Vanessa Schneider, grandes reporters au Monde. Dans ce volume 2, vous découvrirez comment Michel-Marie Leclerc s'est transformé en Michel-Edouard pour plaire à son père, comment les casinos et hôtels Barrière, dirigés par les enfants du précédent propriétaire l'ont évincé. Mais également les sagas marseillaises de la famille Ricard et de la famille des armateurs Saadé.Tous les soirs, du lundi au vendredi à 20h sur France 5, Anne-Elisabeth Lemoine et toute son équipe accueillent les personnalités et artistes qui font l'actualité.

Comment les patrons des grandes entreprises françaises transmettent-ils leur patrimoine à leurs héritiers ? Dans la douleur et les déchirements, dans le cas de la famille Gallimard, dont l'un des petits-fils du fondateur, Antoine, dirige aujourd'hui la maison d'édition. Mais à quel prix a-t-il pris les rênes de l'entreprise ? Dans cet épisode du podcast L'Heure du Monde, les journalistes au « Monde » Raphaëlle Bacqué et Vanessa Schneider nous racontent la saga Gallimard.Un épisode de Cyrielle Bedu. Réalisation et musique du générique : Amandine Robillard. Présentation et rédaction en chef : Jean-Guillaume Santi.Episode publié initialement le 5 octobre 2022.---Pour soutenir "L'Heure du Monde" et notre rédaction, abonnez-vous sur abopodcast.lemonde.fr Hébergé par Audion. Visitez https://www.audion.fm/fr/privacy-policy pour plus d'informations.

Un « parricide ». Tel est le mot employé à de nombreuses reprises par des collaborateurs du groupe Barrière pour désigner la prise de pouvoir par la force d'Alexandre Barrière et de sa sœur, Joy Desseigne-Barrière, pour diriger le Groupe Barrière.Après une longue bataille juridique menée par son fils aîné, Dominique Desseigne s'est, en effet, vu retirer en 2023 toutes les fonctions dirigeantes du groupe, dont il avait pris la tête en 2001, après le décès de sa femme, Diane Barrière, des suites d'un accident d'avion.Sont-ce les longues et douloureuses années d'agonie qu'a subies l'héritière de l'entreprise Barrière qui ont conduit son époux et ses enfants à s'éloigner et à se détester, au point d'entraîner ce putsch une vingtaine d'années plus tard ? Vanessa Schneider est grande reporter au Monde. Elle revient, dans cet épisode de « L'Heure du Monde », sur les origines du Groupe Barrière et sur le destin tragique de son héritière.Un épisode de Cyrielle Bedu. Réalisation : Thomas Zeng. Présentation et suivi éditorial : Jean-Guillaume Santi.Episode publié le 24 octobre 2024.---Pour soutenir "L'Heure du Monde" et notre rédaction, abonnez-vous sur abopodcast.lemonde.fr Hébergé par Audion. Visitez https://www.audion.fm/fr/privacy-policy pour plus d'informations.

Tout a démarré en 1912, quand un certain Eugène Cornudet construit un casino privé à Deauville (Calvados). A sa mort en 1926, son associé, François André, prend la tête de la société et va la faire prospérer grâce à une intuition : créer des hôtels à côté des casinos. « Au début des années 1960, François André était beaucoup plus puissant que le maire de Deauville », raconte Philippe Normand, spécialiste de l'histoire de la ville.L'empire est là, mais pas encore le nom. François André n'a pas d'héritier direct. A sa mort, c'est son neveu Lucien Barrière qui hérite. C'est ainsi que l'empire devient l'empire Barrière. La tragédie viendra à la génération suivante, lorsque la fille adoptive et héritière de Lucien Barrière, Diane Barrière, sera victime d'un terrible accident d'avion.Comment s'est construit l'empire du Groupe Barrière ? Comment un drame risque-t-il d'ébranler cet empire ? Vanessa Schneider, grande reporter au Monde revient, dans cet épisode du podcast « L'Heure du Monde », sur les origines du groupe et sur le destin tragique de son héritière.Un épisode de Cyrielle Bedu. Réalisation : Thomas Zeng. Présentation et suivi éditorial : Jean-Guillaume Santi. Dans cet épisode : extrait d'une interview de Diane Barrière diffusée dans l'émission “Normandie Soir” (France 3 Région) le 6 septembre 1991 ; extrait d'un reportage du journal télévisé de France 3 Nice diffusé le 18 juillet 1995.Episode publié le 23 octobre 2024.---Pour soutenir "L'Heure du Monde" et notre rédaction, abonnez-vous sur abopodcast.lemonde.fr Hébergé par Audion. Visitez https://www.audion.fm/fr/privacy-policy pour plus d'informations.

Après le décès de Paul Wertheimer, puis celui de son frère Pierre, ce sera au fils de ce dernier, Jacques, de prendre la tête de Chanel en 1965. Mais cet esthète fantasque et mondain se révélera moins doué en affaires que ses aînés et son train de vie menacera l'avenir de l'entreprise. Pour éviter cet échec, ses deux fils, Alain et Gérard, le forceront à quitter Chanel et feront ensemble prospérer la marque, jusqu'à aujourd'hui.Un de leur choix stratégique sera particulièrement payant : en 1983, alors que l'image de Chanel se fait vieillissante, ils proposent au styliste allemand Karl Lagerfeld de prendre la direction artistique de la maison de haute couture et d'incarner à leur place la marque auprès du grand public. Cette décision sera un succès et entraînera l'explosion des ventes des cosmétiques et des parfums Chanel.Dans cet épisode de « L'Heure du Monde », les grandes reporters Raphaëlle Bacqué et Vanessa Schneider racontent comment la nouvelle génération des frères Wertheimer a œuvré pour que le joyau du luxe français ne coule pas et comment ces propriétaires envisagent l'avenir de la marque après eux.Un épisode de Cyrielle Bedu. Réalisation : Thomas Zeng. Présentation et suivi éditorial : Jean-Guillaume Santi. Dans cet épisode : interview de Karl Lagerfeld par l'AFP, diffusé le 13 octobre 2015 ; lancement du JT de TF1 du 19 février 2019.Episode publié le 22 octobre 2024.---Pour soutenir "L'Heure du Monde" et notre rédaction, abonnez-vous sur abopodcast.lemonde.fr Hébergé par Audion. Visitez https://www.audion.fm/fr/privacy-policy pour plus d'informations.

Dans « Succession », Raphaëlle Bacqué et Vanessa Schneider racontent les histoires de succession des grandes familles du capitalisme français. Dans cet épisode du podcast « L'Heure du Monde », les deux grandes reporters nous racontent l'histoire de la famille très discrète à la tête de l'empire du luxe français, Chanel.Car les Wertheimer sont particulièrement discrets et ne se montrent guère. En 1924, leurs ancêtres se sont alliés avec la couturière Gabrielle Chanel dite « Coco », qui a pris la lumière, tandis qu'eux géraient l'entreprise.Malgré un conflit autour de la propriété de la marque, qui a vu Coco dénoncer les Wertheimer, juifs, aux Allemands, cette alliance a subsisté pour donner le joyau du luxe que l'on connaît aujourd'hui.De 1924 à 2024, Raphaëlle Bacqué et Vanessa Schneider, grandes reporters au Monde, reviennent sur un siècle de péripéties derrière la marque au célèbre « numéro 5 ».Un épisode de Cyrielle Bedu. Réalisation : Florentin Baume. Présentation et suivi éditorial : Jean-Guillaume Santi.---Pour soutenir "L'Heure du Monde" et notre rédaction, abonnez-vous sur abopodcast.lemonde.fr Hébergé par Audion. Visitez https://www.audion.fm/fr/privacy-policy pour plus d'informations.

durée : 00:06:05 - Le Masque et la Plume - La cinéaste adapte le livre de la journaliste Vanessa Schneider, cousine de la comédienne Maria Schneider dont la vie a basculé sur le tournage de "Dernier Tango à Paris" de Bernardo Bertolucci, durant lequel elle avait été victime d'un abus sexuel lors d'une scène avec Marlon Brando.

"Maria" ou quand le cinéma d'aujourd'hui fait écho à celui d'hier. C'est le destin brisé de Maria Schneider qui nous est relaté dans un film à découvrir au cinéma sur la vie de l'actrice, connue bien évidemment pour son rôle dans "Le Dernier Tango à Paris" aux côtés de Marlon Brando, réalisé par Bernardo Bertolucci. Le film, sobrement intitulé "Maria", nous montre à quel point le tournage du "Dernier Tango" et sa fameuse scène de viol, résumée bien souvent à un salace "passe-moi le beurre" fut traumatisant pour la jeune actrice. Elle fut la première à dénoncer les abus dans le milieu du cinéma, bien avant metoo. Le film est adapté du livre, "Tu t'Appelais Maria Schneider", écrit par sa cousine, Vanessa Schneider, grande reporter au monde et qui a été la confidente de Maria. A la réalisation : Jessica Palud, l'actrice qui incarne Maria Schneider : la comédienne Anamaria Vartolomei. Elle avait remporté le césar du meilleur espoir féminin pour son interprétation dans "L'Événement", d'Audrey Diwan. ---Tous les mercredis à 8h45, Cathy Immelen épingle pour vous les sorties cinéma . Elle vous dévoile ses coups de cœur et ses déceptions, dans la bonne humeur. Merci pour votre écoute Pour écouter Classic 21 à tout moment : www.rtbf.be/classic21 Retrouvez tous les contenus de la RTBF sur notre plateforme Auvio.be Et si vous avez apprécié ce podcast, n'hésitez pas à nous donner des étoiles ou des commentaires, cela nous aide à le faire connaître plus largement.

des cinéastes et des comédiennes engagées chacun, chacune, à leur manière avec entre autres Michel HAZANAVICIUS, Judith GODRÈCHE et un moment très fort consacré à la situation en Iran avec la comédienne Golshifteh FARAHANI et un homme qui vient de quitter clandestinement son pays pour échapper à la prison : le réalisateur Mohammad RASOULOF, notre palme d'Or du courage Golshifteh Farahani Mohammad Rasoulof pour le film Les graines du figuier sauvage, Michel Hazanavicius pour le film La plus précieuse des marchandises, Jessica Palud et Vanessa Schneider pour le film "Maria", Judith Godrèche réalisatrice du court-métrage "Moi aussi".

Was? Nein? Doch! Nach über sechs Monaten Sendepause kehrt SEHR SEHR SERIEN mit dem großen (und extralangen) Jahresrückblick 2023 zurück! 27 Kritiker*innen und Expert*innen haben in den letzten Wochen ihre Serienfavoriten des Jahres abgeliefert, Vanessa Schneider, Christopher Büchele und Gerhard Maier diskutieren die Top 20-Liste, die sich daraus ergeben hat. Was waren die größten Serienüberraschungen des Jahres? Was die größten Enttäuschungen? Worauf freuen wir uns besonders in 2024? Und welche Trends hat uns das vergangene Jahr beschert? Da es viel zu erzählen gibt, hier in Überlänge. wer direkt bei den jeweiligen Plätzen landen will: Minute 09:00 - Der liebste Streamer der befragten Kritiker*innenMinute 13:50 - Die Top 20 Minute 47:00 - Die Top 10Minute 51:30 - Platz 9Minute 56:00 - Platz 8Minute 60:00 - Platz 7Minute 65:30 - Platz 6Minute 69:30 - Platz 5Minute 76:00 - Platz 4Minute 82:00 - Platz 3Minute 87:00 - Platz 2Minute 91:00 - Platz 1Hier noch ein paar versprochene Notizen zum Nachlesen und Weiterverfolgen:  Jidai-geki  Japanische Historienfilme, die meist vor der Meji-Restauration spielen und somit oft im Westen auch als Samurai-Filme bezeichnet werden. Nach den klassischen Filmen der 30er und 40er Jahren folgte die unheroische Neuinterpretation durhc  Regisseure wie Akira Kurosawa (Yojimbo) und Masaki Kobayashi (Harakiri). Ab den 70er Jahre eine Reihe von blutigen Exploitation-Filmen wie die Okami-Reihe (Lone Wolf & Cub). Letztere wiederum war eine große Inspiration für THE MANDALORIAN.  Folgt uns gerne auf Instagram (@seriencamp_festival bzw. @grrrhard.maier) oder besucht unsere Webseite https://seriencamp.tv/festival/

« Perdriau, démission. » Depuis plusieurs mois, manifestations et casserolades accompagnent chaque déplacement du maire (ex-LR) de Saint-Etienne, Gaël Perdriau, accusé d'avoir orchestré un chantage à caractère sexuel contre celui qui était à l'époque son premier adjoint, le centriste Gilles Artigues.Cette affaire, mise au jour par Mediapart en août 2022 et dans laquelle l'édile est mis en examen, a connu un nouveau rebondissement en octobre, avec la révélation d'un second projet de chantage sordide, imaginé cette fois contre l'ancien maire stéphanois Michel Thiollière.Que sait-on exactement de ces barbouzeries à la mairie de Saint-Etienne aujourd'hui ? Et à quoi ressemble le quotidien de la métropole, dont le maire refuse de démissionner ? Dans cet épisode du podcast « L'Heure du Monde », Vanessa Schneider, grande reporter au Monde, qui a rencontré les différents protagonistes de ces affaires sur place, raconte le scandale et ses répercussions pour la ville.Un épisode de Cyrielle Bedu. Réalisation et musiques : Amandine Robillard. Présentation : Jean-Guillaume Santi. Rédaction en chef : Margaux Lannuzel. Dans cet épisode : extrait de l'enregistrement d'une conversation entre Gaël Perdriau et Gilles Artigues, publié par Mediapart.---Retrouvez ici le récit de Vanessa Schneider : A Saint-Etienne, le scandale de la « sextape » n'en finit plus de traumatiser la villePour soutenir "L'Heure du Monde" et notre rédaction, abonnez-vous sur abopodcast.lemonde.fr

durée : 00:54:35 - Affaires sensibles - par : Fabrice Drouelle - Interdit, coupé et détruit, à la fois un succès et un film pestiféré. Maria Schneider, Marlon Brando et Jean-Pierre Léaud se partagent l'affiche. Invitée Vanessa Schneider qui vient de publier un livre à la mémoire de sa cousine actrice chez Grasset. - invités : Vanessa Schneider - Vanessa Schneider : Journaliste - réalisé par : Helene Bizieau

At 19, French actor Maria Schneider was launched into the spotlight for her role in the erotic drama "Last Tango in Paris." The notorious film made her famous, but haunted the rest of her life. But she was more than that to her cousin Vanessa, whose memoir "My Cousin Maria Schneider" tells her story. John Yang speaks to Vanessa Schneider and actor, writer and translator Molly Ringwald for more. PBS NewsHour is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/funders

"The Last of Us", "Succession" und "Black Mirror": im ersten Halbjahr 2023 gab's viele Serien-Highlights. Aber auch viele Serien, die neben den Blockbustern untergegangen sind. In der finalen Podcastfolge von "Skip Intro" verabschieden sich die Hosts Katja Engelhardt und Vanessa Schneider und blicken auf die Serienneustarts der vergangenen sechs Monate zurück. Wir sprechen über unsere persönlichen Favorites abseits der großen Hits - und die aktuellen Serientrends. Darunter die überraschende Netflix-Serie "BEEF" über eine außer Kontrolle geratene Rivalität, die softe Science Fiction Dramedy "Tender Hearts" (Wow), die Murder Mystery "Poker Face" (Peacock) und die historische Serie "Ein Funken Hoffnung" von Disney+ über Miep Gies - die Frau, die Anne Frank versteckte. Shownotes: Vielen vielen Dank, dass ihr uns zugehört habt. Wir verabschieden uns mit dieser "Skip Intro"-Folge von euch und freuen uns über Nachrichten und Feedback an uns - und unsere Redaktion. Warum habt ihr "Skip Intro" gern gehört? Schreibt an den Bayern 2 Hörerservice: https://www.br.de/radio/bayern2/service/kontakt-hoererservice-100.html oder an skipintro at br.de Für Serientipps, Interviews und fundierte Gespräche rund um aktuelle Serienstarts, folgt "Glotz und Gloria", dem Serienpodcast von WDR Cosmo mit Jörn Behr und Emily Thomey. Lasst ihnen ein Abo da und fünf Sterne! https://www.ardaudiothek.de/sendung/cosmo-glotz-und-gloria/52239092/ Das Interview mit Dabiel Donskoy zu seiner Rolle als Nazi in der Disney+-Serie "A Small Light" - "Ein Funken Hoffnung": https://www.ardmediathek.de/video/koelner-treff/schauspieler-daniel-donskoy/wdr/Y3JpZDovL3dkci5kZS9CZWl0cmFnLThhYjlkYTI1LWM3ZTAtNDA4Yy05ZmE4LWE4NjI4MTczOGRlMg Mehr zum Writers Strike in den USA erfahrt ihr hier in dieser Folge vom NYT Podcast "The Daily": https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/05/podcasts/the-daily/tv-wga-writers-strike.html?mc_cid=16621237b1 und in dieser Episode von "Lakonisch Elegant" in der ARD Audiothek: https://www.ardaudiothek.de/episode/lakonisch-elegant-deutschlandfunk-kultur/streiks-in-hollywood-wie-viel-ist-eigentlich-ein-drehbuch-wert/deutschlandfunk-kultur/12648267/ Auf diese "Skip Intro"-Folgen haben wir uns bezogen "Transatlantic": https://www.ardaudiothek.de/episode/skip-intro-der-serien-podcast/transatlantic-netflix-kann-der-2-weltkrieg-eine-dramedy-sein/bayern-2/12593451/ "Silo": https://www.ardaudiothek.de/episode/skip-intro-der-serien-podcast/silo-appletv-die-beste-sci-fi-serie-des-jahres/bayern-2/12673289/ "The Last of Us": https://www.ardaudiothek.de/episode/skip-intro-der-serien-podcast/the-last-of-us-sky-wow-die-bisher-beste-games-serie/bayern-2/12355039/ "Shrinking": https://www.ardaudiothek.de/episode/skip-intro-der-serien-podcast/shrinking-appletv-dramedy-fuer-ted-lasso-fans/bayern-2/12375427/ "Skip Intro" ist eine Produktion des Bayerischen Rundfunks. Hier findet ihr auch Berichterstattung und Hintergründe zu aktuellen Ereignissen, etwa bei BR24: https://www.br.de/nachrichten/ Impressum: https://www.br.de/unternehmen/service/impressum/index.html

Elle écrit des portraits, des enquêtes, des essais politiques, bref c'est une journaliste politique, mais pas que. Il se trouve que Vanessa Schneider, grand reporter au journal Le Monde, est une Française née au cœur des mondes, merci pour toute la famille. Pour En Sol Majeur et en trois livres parus en poche (Tâche de ne pas devenir folle, La mère de ma mère & Tu t'appelais Maria Schneider), je mesure la nécessité pour Vanessa Schneider de coucher sur le papier Marthe, Hélène, Constantin, Clara, des prénoms fragiles et précieux comme de la porcelaine, brinquebalés dans la grande Histoire et qui produiront une tribu cabossée (je la cite). Au menu de cette conversation pleine d'origines silencieuses, la Roumanie, Haïti chérie, les hippies des années papa, une petite icône transmise de mère en fille et la figure de Georges Kiejman (L'homme qui voulait être aimé qui paraît en poche aussi et qui fait partie de la famille élargie).Les choix musicaux de Vanessa SchneiderLa Callas Puccini O mio babbino caroJosephine Baker Si j'étais blancheBob Marley Get up, stand up

Kida Ramadan will die britische Showbiz-Satire "Extras” von Ricky Gervais nach Deutschland bringen, obwohl im Ausland niemand die deutschen Filmstars kennt. Wie er das tut, erzählt die neue Comedy-Serie "German Genius” und nimmt dabei die deutsche Filmbranche ordentlich auf die Schippe. Neben Kida Ramadan ist auch Serienschöpfer Detlev Buck zu sehen, sowie das Who-is-Who des deutschen Films. Ob Maria Furtwängler, Olli Schulz, Tom Schilling oder Regisseur Leander Hausmann - alle spielen eine überzeichnete Version von sich selbst. Warum dieser Meta-Humor bei Stories über die Welt des Films immer wieder so gut funktioniert und ob "German Genius” besser ist, als das Klischee vom deutschen Film, das besprechen die Hosts Katja Engelhardt und Vanessa Schneider in dieser Folge von Skip Intro. Katjas Review zur Serie "Irma Vep” könnt ihr euch hier anhören: https://www.ardaudiothek.de/episode/skip-intro-der-serien-podcast/irma-vep-sky-wow-so-meta-dass-der-kopf-schwirrt/bayern-2/10822305/ Vanessas Review zu "Hollywood” findet ihr hier: https://www.ardaudiothek.de/episode/skip-intro-der-serien-podcast/kurzkritik-hollywood-ein-liebesbrief-an-das-alte-hollywood/bayern-2/78874306/ Weitere Showbiz-Satiren für eure Watchlist: - The Idol (Wow) - Reboot (Disney+) - Curb Your Enthusiam/Lass es Larry (on demand) - Call my Agent (MagentaTV) - Entourage (Wow) - Extras (on demand) - Barry (Wow) - The Other Two (on demand) - 30 Rock (on demand) - Pastewka Die Doku "Kida - Von Beirut nach Berlin” könnt ihr in der ARD Mediathek anschauen: https://www.ardmediathek.de/serie/kida-von-beirut-nach-berlin/staffel-1/Y3JpZDovL3N3ci5kZS9zZGIvc3RJZC8xNTI1/1 "Skip Intro" findet ihr hier und frei zugänglich in der ARD Audiothek. Wir freuen uns über euer Feedback an skipintro at br.de und ein Abo von euch! "Skip Intro" ist eine Produktion des Bayerischen Rundfunks. Hier findet ihr auch Berichterstattung und Hintergründe zu aktuellen Ereignissen, etwa bei BR24: https://www.br.de/nachrichten/ Impressum: https://www.br.de/unternehmen/service/impressum/index.html

Kurz vor dem Start des Seriencamp Festival in Köln vom 14.-17. Juni geben Vanessa Schneider und Gerhard Maier einen ersten Ausblick auf das Programm. Denn neben reichlich Hits aus Deutschland, Europa und den USA finden sich wieder viele Serienkostbarkeiten aus allen Teilen der Welt. Wir machen mit euch eine kleine Weltreise bei der wir unter anderem Station in Mexiko, Spanien, Iran, Südkorea, Kasachstan und Norwegen machen.  Dabei klären wir noch einmal auf, was uns an diesen Serien so fasziniert und warum sie sich teilweise derart stark abheben von der üblichen Serienkost, die wir sonst so vorgesetzt bekommen. Denn neben einer surrealen Schwarz-Weiß-Serie, einer Hip Hop-Coming Of Age-Story, einem arthausigen Procedural über abgebrannte Schauspieler in Teheran, einem südkoreanischen Katastrophen-Thriller und einer spanischen Horrorserie ist jede Menge geboten.  Hört einfach rein und findet mehr raus in Köln beim Seriencamp – mehr Infos unter seriencamp.tv

EPISODE BONUS :C'est l'épisode Bonus de mon invitée de la semaine dernière, Vanessa Schneider, Grand Reporter au journal Le Monde.

140 Stockwerke tief liegt das Silo unter der Erde: Hier sind zehntausende von Menschen zuhause - es gibt ein Kraftwerk, Äcker, Gewächshäuser, sogar eine Recyclinganlage. Denn nichts und niemand darf das Silo verlassen. So will es der Pakt, der das Zusammenleben unter der Erde seit einem katastrophalen Ereignis vor über hundert Jahren regelt. Doch was, wenn der auf einer Lüge gründet? Hugh Howey hat für seinen Science Fiction Mehrteiler "Wool" eine spannende rätselhafte Story über mehrere Generationen gesponnen - und eine faszinierende Welt entworfen. In der neuen AppleTV+ Verfilmung des Bestsellers erwacht diese Sci-Fi-Welt jetzt eindrucksvoll zum Leben. Doch was genau ist eigentlich Science Fiction und was macht gute Science-Fiction-Erzählungen aus? Youtuber Jack Pop überprüft wissenschaftlich bei "Science vs. Fiction", wie viel an den Ideen aus Science-Fiction-Serien und Filmen dran ist. Er erklärt den "Skip Intro"-Hosts Katja Engelhardt und Vanessa Schneider, wie plausibel die Wissenschaft in Sci-Fi Stories sein muss und worin die Grenzen des Genres liegen. Shownotes: Wir empfehlen allen Serienfans den Youtube-Kanal "Science vs. Fiction" mit Jack Pop zu abonnieren. Hier findet ihr eine Playlist mit allen Folgen, die sich um Serien drehen: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mg3E_tR6-6A&list=PL0IWTz7tiz0Zgba5eUgL2DmhI8r66LHaV Mehr zur Studie, die nahelegt, dass Dystopische Filme wie "Hunger Games" und "Divergent" die die Bereitschaft des Publikums erhöht politische Gewalt zu rechtfertigen, lest ihr in der Washington Post: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2019/01/11/dystopian-fiction-makes-people-more-willing-to-justify-political-violence/ Die Serie "Utopia" findet ihr in der ARTE Mediathek Die zwei Staffeln sind ab dem 12.05. verfügbar: https://www.arte.tv/de/videos/110970-001-A/utopia-staffel-1-1-6/ "Skip Intro" findet ihr hier und frei zugänglich in der ARD Audiothek. Wir freuen uns über euer Feedback an skipintro at br.de und ein Abo von euch! "Skip Intro" ist eine Produktion des Bayerischen Rundfunks. Hier findet ihr auch Berichterstattung und Hintergründe zu aktuellen Ereignissen, etwa bei BR24: https://www.br.de/nachrichten/ Impressum: https://www.br.de/unternehmen/service/impressum/index.html

durée : 02:28:51 - Le 7/9.30 - par : Nicolas Demorand, Léa Salamé - Frans Timmermans, vice-président de la Commission européenne, Jean-François Colosimo, historien et essayiste, Ahmet Insel, politologue, Claude Guibal, journaliste à France Inter, François Samuelson, agent littéraire, et Vanessa Schneider, journaliste, sont les invités de la matinale.

Aujourd'hui au micro de Genre de Fille je reçois Vanessa Schneider, journaliste, Grand Reporter au Monde et autrice de romans dont "Tu t'appelais Maria Schneider" et de plusieurs essais, notamment le dernier en date, "Successions" écrit avec Raphaëlle Bacqué. Maria Schneider était la cousine de Vanessa et l'actrice emblématique du film “le dernier tango à Paris” avec Marlon Brando. Dans cet épisode, on parle des abus subis par l'actrice dans ce film qui a détruit sa vie, de #Metoo, d'un tweet de Jessica Chastain, de l'adaptation au cinéma du livre de Vanessa aux Etats-Unis. C'est la transmission qui passionne Vanessa Schneider, et c'est ce qui explique sûrement pourquoi son livre "Successions, le sang, l'argent, les armes" - écrit avec Raphaëlle Bacqué - éditions Albin Michel est passionnant. Successions, c'est 12 chapitres pour douze familles, des Bolloré aux Bouygues en passant par les Arnault, les Decaux, les Seydoux.Vanessa raconte comment elle les a rencontré, ceux qui l'ont marquée, l'ambivalence de ces grands patrons obsédés à former la suite mais ne voulant pas lâcher le pouvoir. Spoiler : niveau féminisme et égalité, c'est pas encore ça. Comprenez l'absence des femmes dans ces fameuses successions. On parle aussi de la succession la plus loupée, celle qui m'a le plus émue, le grand patron qui fait une dépression car il est parti trop tôt.Chaque chapitre, c'est la série Succession qui rencontre une tragédie grecque : choix de l'héritier, impact sur la famille, ego à gérer. C'est en définitive des questions universelles sur la famille, les valeurs, les malheurs. Comment choisir l'héritier ? “C'est une question complexe qui touche à l'intime, aux émotions et aux histoires de famille. Les critères peuvent être variés, comme la préférence pour un enfant, le choix de celui qui ressemble le plus, ou encore celui qui est jugé le plus apte.”On parle de la difficulté de préparer l'après : “C'est difficile pour les entrepreneurs de se dire qu'ils vont mourir un jour, donc souvent on préfère ne pas y penser." Dernier sujet, le plus intime pour mon invitée : une tribune publiée dans le Monde, où Vanessa dénonce la faillite de la prise en charge de la fin de vie en France : le récit des derniers mois de vie de son père, le psychanalyste et écrivain Michel Schneider. “Mon père voulait juste mourir dignement” c'est le titre de cet article “Ce moment là, entre l'arrêt des soins dans le cas des cancers quand les patients sont condamnés et la mort, ce sont des moments extrêmement importants, des moments de grande anxiété, de peur pour le patient et pour la famille on arrive au bout de la fatigue, et justement c'est à ce moment-là qu'il n'y a pas de solution” raconte la grand reporter du quotidien. Merci Vanessa Schneider pour cet échange. Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

Retour sur les travaux de la Convention Citoyenne sur la fin de vie, qui vient de remettre ses conclusions au président de la République… Faut-il légaliser le suicide assisté voire l'euthanasie ? S'agit-il d'un progrès ou d'une dangereuse rupture anthropologique ? Choisir sa mort est-il un droit, une liberté individuelle ? Donner la mort peut-il relever du soin ? Claire THOURY, Présidente du comité de gouvernance de la convention citoyenne sur la fin de vie Claude GRANGE, Médecin, praticien hospitalier, ex-chef du service de soins palliatifs de l'hôpital de Houdan (78), co-auteur avec Régis Debray de « Le dernier souffle. Accompagner la fin de vie » aux éditions Gallimard (02/03/23) Benoit COHEN, Cinéaste, écrivain, auteur de « Formidable » aux éditions Flammarion (01/03/2023) Vanessa SCHNEIDER, Grand reporter au Monde, romancière Frédéric WORMS, Philosophe, directeur de l'École normale supérieure, ancien membre du Comité consultatif national d'éthique Jérôme CHAPUIS, Directeur de la rédaction de La Croix

durée : 00:59:11 - Le 13/14 - par : Bruno DUVIC - Vanessa Schneider

La chasse aux grandes fortunes pour financer les retraites… Ces derniers jours ce sont bien les ultra-riches qui sont pointés du doigt par une partie de la classe politique, en écho à ce que pense une majorité de Français… Alors la France est-elle un paradis fiscal pour ultra riches ? Est-ce immoral d'être milliardaire en France en 2023 comme le disait ce matin le député insoumis Manuel BOMPARD ? Taxer les plus riches, est-ce contre-productif comme le disent certains ou au contraire LA solution pour réparer la société et la cohésion nationale ? On en débat avec : François RUFFIN, Député Picardie Debout-NUPES de la Somme, auteur de « Le Temps d'apprendre à vivre » aux éditions Les liens qui libèrent (30/11/2022) Félix MARQUARDT, Co-fondateur du Think tank Black Elephant Sarah SALDMANN, Avocate au barreau de Paris Raphaëlle BACQUÉ, Grand reporter au journal Le Monde, co-autrice avec Vanessa Schneider de « Successions » aux éditions Albin Michel (05/10/22) Erwan LE NOAN, Consultant en stratégie, membre du conseil scientifique et d'évaluation de la Fondation pour l'innovation politique (Fondapol) Thomas PORCHER, Économiste, membre des Économistes atterrés, docteur en économie à l'université Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne, auteur de « Mon Dictionnaire d'économie » aux éditions Fayard (28/09/2022)

Mention légales : Vos données de connexion, dont votre adresse IP, sont traités par Radio Classique, responsable de traitement, sur la base de son intérêt légitime, par l'intermédiaire de son sous-traitant Ausha, à des fins de réalisation de statistiques agréées et de lutte contre la fraude. Ces données sont supprimées en temps réel pour la finalité statistique et sous cinq mois à compter de la collecte à des fins de lutte contre la fraude. Pour plus d'informations sur les traitements réalisés par Radio Classique et exercer vos droits, consultez notre Politique de confidentialité.

Vampire sind aus der Popkultur seit Bram Stokers "Dracula" nicht wegzudenken. Und es sieht ganz so aus, als ob gerade wieder eine neue Vampir-Welle auf uns zu rollt. Den Anfang macht die Serien-Neuverfilmung des Kultromans "Interview with the Vampire" von Anne Rice. Die Serie mit "Game of Thrones"-Star Jacob Anderson ist während der Covid19-Pandemie angesiedelt und das ist kein Zufall. Was der Vampirmythos mit der Verbreitung von Seuchen zu tun hat und was uns Untote wie Vampire und Zombies über Pandemien erzählen, das besprechen die "Skip Intro"-Hosts Katja Engelhardt und Vanessa Schneider in dieser Folge mit der Anglistik-Professorin Elisabeth Bronfen.

Weil Emily leider nicht dabei sein kann, hat Jörn für diese Folge Vanessa Schneider vom BR-Serienpodcast Skip Intro eingeladen, ihre Lieblingsserien 2022 mitzubringen. Zusammen sprechen sie über ein deutsches Drama, eine schwule Liebesgeschichte oder auch Ekelszenen in der Wildnis. // Die Shownotes zur Folge: http://www.wdr.de/k/glotzundgloria Kontakt für eure Highlights des Jahres: glotzundgloria@wdr.de Von Jörn Behr.

Über eine Milliarde Stunden soll laut dem Streamingdienst Netflix die erste Staffel Wednesday in den ersten drei Wochen abgerufen worden sein. Hanna Huge von Serienjunkies.de und Vanessa Schneider vom Skip Intro Podcast versuchen dem Hype auf die Spur zu kommen. Was hat der Erfolg mit dem Kultregisseur Tim Burton zu tun? Wie „ikonisch“ oder „TikTok-fähig“ ist der Tanz von Hauptdarstellerin Jenna Ortega? Und was hat in der ersten Staffel vielleicht nicht so gut funktioniert? 0:00:00 Vorgeplänkel & die Addams Family0:06:00 Worum geht es eigentlich?0:09:00 Jenna Ortega & das Kostümdesign 0:14:00 Kurzfazit & ab 12 Jahren?0:18:20 SPOILERTEIL0:22:00 Tanzszene & Shitstorm0:30:00 Die mysteriösen Morde 0:38:00 Das eiskalte HändchenVanessa bei Twitter: https://twitter.com/sncfxtnVanessa bei Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/sncfxtn Hanna bei Twitter: https://twitter.com/HannaHugeHanna bei Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/mediawhore Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Herzlich Willkommen zur "Skip Intro"-Revue 2022! Wir haben die für uns besten Serien 2021 zusammengestellt. Unser Best of reicht von von der Meta-Überraschung "Irma Vep" (Sky) über das Remake des Kult-Klassikers "A League Of Their Own" (Prime Video), bis hin zu "Gaslit" (Starzplay) einer Serie über den Watergate-Skandal. Außerdem spüren wie die Hektik und die Hitze einer Restaurantküche im Kritikerliebling "The Bear" (Disney+), erleben mysteriöse Zeitsprünge in "Shining Girls" (Apple TV+) und auch der neueste Zugang in der Serienwelt "Wednesday" (Netflix) darf nicht fehlen. Außerdem freuen sich die Hosts Katja Engelhardt und Vanessa Schneider über eine Premiere: Ihr habt auch über eure Lieblingsserien abgestimmt und Skip Intro präsentiert die Top 3 Hörer:innencharts.

L'UNIVERS IMPITOYABLE DES GRANDES FAMILLES – 11/10/22 VANESSA SCHNEIDER Grand reporter – « Le Monde » Coauteure de « Successions : l'argent, le sang et les larmes » Les journalistes Raphaëlle Bacqué et Vanessa Schneider viennent de publier un livre : "Successions - L'argent, le sang et les larmes", fruit de nombreux mois d'enquête sur les grandes dynasties du capitalisme français. En France, on compte quelque 6000 entreprises familiales, et le principal danger qui les menace n'est ni l'État ni le chaos de l'économie, mais bien souvent les mésententes entre héritiers. Une entreprise familiale sur deux ne survit pas à son créateur. Une prophétie se répète d'ailleurs au sein de toutes les familles du monde des affaires et est dans tous les esprits : « La première génération crée, la seconde gère, la troisième tue » Les deux autrices rappellent que les enjeux ne sont pas toujours les mêmes. « Pour les nouvelles fortunes, comme les Arnault, Bolloré, Decaux, Bouygues ou Pinault, l'enjeu est déjà de réussir la première étape. Pour les vieilles familles, celles dont les marques ont traversé le siècle, comme les Peugeot, les Hermès, les Bettencourt ou les Mulliez, le défi est différent : comment donner aux héritiers l'envie de continuer une aventure lancée plusieurs générations avant eux ? » Les récits sont universels, expliquent Raphaëlle Bacqué et Vanessa Schneider. « Ils racontent des patriarches, car il s'agit souvent d'hommes, qui observent leurs enfants avec un oeil particulier : celui du patron évaluant le futur manager. » Dans ces successions, c'est avant tout une affaire de sentiments. Des fratries qui se déchirent comme chez les Bouygues ou les Gallimard, des frères bannis, des fils préférés et d'autres qui ne se sentent pas à la hauteur, comme Arnaud Lagardère, des filles que l'on a écartées. Les conséquences sont parfois dramatiques et mettent en péril à la fois la solidité d'une famille, mais peuvent mettre en danger un groupe industriel. Vanessa Schneider reviendra sur ces grandes familles, sur la question de la transmission et sur les enjeux de ces successions.

L'UNIVERS IMPITOYABLE DES GRANDES FAMILLES – 11/10/22 VANESSA SCHNEIDER Grand reporter – « Le Monde » Coauteure de « Successions : l'argent, le sang et les larmes » Les journalistes Raphaëlle Bacqué et Vanessa Schneider viennent de publier un livre : "Successions - L'argent, le sang et les larmes", fruit de nombreux mois d'enquête sur les grandes dynasties du capitalisme français. ​​ En France, on compte quelque 6000 entreprises familiales, et le principal danger qui les menace n'est ni l'État ni le chaos de l'économie, mais bien souvent les mésententes entre héritiers. Une entreprise familiale sur deux ne survit pas à son créateur. Une prophétie se répète d'ailleurs au sein de toutes les familles du monde des affaires et est dans tous les esprits : « La première génération crée, la seconde gère, la troisième tue » ​​ Les deux autrices rappellent que les enjeux ne sont pas toujours les mêmes. « Pour les nouvelles fortunes, comme les Arnault, Bolloré, Decaux, Bouygues ou Pinault, l'enjeu est déjà de réussir la première étape. Pour les vieilles familles, celles dont les marques ont traversé le siècle, comme les Peugeot, les Hermès, les Bettencourt ou les Mulliez, le défi est différent : comment donner aux héritiers l'envie de continuer une aventure lancée plusieurs générations avant eux ? » Les récits sont universels, expliquent Raphaëlle Bacqué et Vanessa Schneider. « Ils racontent des patriarches, car il s'agit souvent d'hommes, qui observent leurs enfants avec un œil particulier : celui du patron évaluant le futur manager. » ​​ Dans ces successions, c'est avant tout une affaire de sentiments. Des fratries qui se déchirent comme chez les Bouygues ou les Gallimard, des frères bannis, des fils préférés et d'autres qui ne se sentent pas à la hauteur, comme Arnaud Lagardère, des filles que l'on a écartées. Les conséquences sont parfois dramatiques et mettent en péril à la fois la solidité d'une famille, mais peuvent mettre en danger un groupe industriel. ​​ Vanessa Schneider reviendra sur ces grandes familles, sur la question de la transmission et sur les enjeux de ces successions.

Comment les patrons des grandes entreprises françaises transmettent-ils leur patrimoine à leurs héritiers ? Dans la douleur et les déchirements, dans le cas de la famille Gallimard, dont l'un des petits-fils du fondateur, Antoine, dirige aujourd'hui la maison d'édition. Mais à quel prix a-t-il pris les rênes de l'entreprise ? Les journalistes au « Monde » Raphaëlle Bacqué et Vanessa Schneider nous racontent la saga Gallimard dans ce podcast.Un épisode de Cyrielle Bedu. Réalisation et musique du générique : Amandine Robillard. Présentation et rédaction en chef : Jean-Guillaume Santi.

Comment les dirigeants de grandes entreprises françaises organisent-ils la transmission de leur patrimoine ? Pour le savoir, les journalistes du « Monde » Raphaëlle Bacqué et Vanessa Schneider ont enquêté sur des histoires d'héritage. Dans cet épisode, elles nous racontent une succession enviée et en apparence réussie : celle des héritiers de l'entreprise JCDecaux.Un épisode de Cyrielle Bedu. Réalisation : Florentin Baume et Quentin Tenaud. Musique du générique : Amandine Robillard. Présentation et rédaction en chef : Jean-Guillaume Santi. ---Mise à jour 4/10 à 12h00 : rajout d'une question mentionnant les points de critiques qui peuvent exister sur l'entreprise

Die dritte Staffel der alternativen Weltraum-Serie “For All Mankind” ging heute mit der wöchentlichen Ausstrahlung der zehn Episoden zu ende. Der Wettlauf um den Mars und die Geschehnisse auf dem Mars stehen im Fokus der Staffel, wobei natürlich das Drama auf der Erde weitergeht.Vanessa Schneider von dem Podcast Skip Intro und Hanna Huge von Serienjunkies.de behandeln die komplette dritte Staffel mit ihren Highlights und Lowlights. Alle Geschehnisse der Staffel werden gespoilert. 0:00 Vorgeplänkel0:05 Auftakt der Staffel0:09 Ed und Karen0:18 Margo und Sergei in Folge 30:28 Hintergrundvideos zur Geschichte bei Apple TV+0:31 Die Jimmy-Storyline0:36 Danny, meh!0:42 Die Russen0:50 Landung auf dem Mars (Hanna sagt immer Phoenix und nicht Polaris;))0:54 Menstruation und Verhütung im Weltall1:00 Nordkorea 1:03 Don't Ask, Don't TellNachgeplänkelVanessa auf Twitter: https://twitter.com/sncfxtn Skip Intro Podcast https://open.spotify.com/show/0AvBUg0Jd5iNLW8reEuoQU Hanna auf Twitter: https://twitter.com/HannaHuge Das Serienjunkies-Interview mit Joel Kinnaman: https://www.serienjunkies.de/news/all-mankind-interview-joel-kinnaman-106005.html Our GDPR privacy policy was updated on August 8, 2022. Visit acast.com/privacy for more information.

Halbzeit! Pünktlich zum Sommer - denn Ferienzeit ist Serienzeit - präsentieren die "Skip Intro"-Hosts Katja Engelhardt und Vanessa Schneider ihre bisher liebsten Serien 2022 und schauen auf Trends in der Serienwelt. Jede stellt ihre Top 3 vor, was nach Adam Riese sechs Serien macht. Es sei denn natürlich: Es gäbe da Überschneidungen.

Lügen, Größenwahn und Spekulation am Aktienmarkt: Als der Co-Gründer Felix Armand aufs Abstellgleis geschoben wird, nimmt er sein Schicksal selbst in die Hand und verwickelt das komplette Unternehmen in einen Riesenskandal. Als Inspiration diente den Serienschöpfern Matthias Murmann und Philipp Käßbohrer die WireCard-Story, herausgekommen ist eine Satire über Schein und Sein der Start-Up-Welt und dem Clash mit der deutschen Piefigkeit. Genau das richtige Thema für die Produktionsfirma Bildundtonfabrik (btf) aus Köln, die früher das Neo Magazin Royale für Jan Böhmermann und mit "How To Sell Drugs Online (fast)” einen der größten, deutschen Netflix-Hits produzierten. In dieser Sendung ergründen die Skip Intro HostsKatja Engelhardt und Vanessa Schneider warum Hochstapler-Stories zum Zeitgeist passen und was an ihnen so lustig ist.

durée : 00:25:57 - Livres & vous, le podcast - par : Guillaume Erner - Dans "Livres & Vous" sur Public Sénat, Guillaume Erner et ses invités, Dan Franck et Vanessa Schneider, nous dévoilent deux destins singuliers, marqués par la violence politique, ceux de Blèmia Borowicz et de Joëlle Aubron, à travers deux ouvrages dans lesquels Histoire et fiction s'entremêlent. - invités : Vanessa Schneider Journaliste; Dan Franck Ecrivain et scénariste

durée : 00:54:07 - La librairie francophone - par : Emmanuel Kherad - Ce week-end nous serons avec Vanessa Schneider qui décrypte le groupe terroriste Action directe dans son nouveau roman. Jean-Philippe Toussaint vous racontera les coulisses de son écriture et vous entendrez aussi la chanteuse Oumou Sangaré et les bédéistes Berbérian et Tronchet

Vanessa Schneider intitulée "La fille de Deauville", publié chez Grasset, que Nicolas Buytaers a interviewée.

Die neue deutsche Sky-Serie "Funeral for a Dog” führt das Publikum vor dem Bildschirm um die ganze Welt und macht Halt in Finnland, Kolumbien, New York und Italien. Sie basiert auf dem gefeierten Debütroman "Bestattung eines Hundes” von Thomas Pletzinger und wurde von ihm und dem Drehbuchautoren-Trio HaRiBo ("4 Blocks" oder "Para - Wir sind King") als Serie adaptiert. Warum das gar nicht so einfach war, erzählen Drehbuchautor Hanno Hackfort und der Hauptdarsteller Friedrich Mücke in der Filmkultur mit Katja Engelhardt und Vanessa Schneider.

When was the last time you noticed any changes to GOV.UK? We share how and why we've updated its homepage and menu bars.   Podcast update note: We have made some editorial changes to the podcast published on 28 February 2022 to improve clarity on the work we are doing.   --------- The transcript of the episode follows:   Vanessa Schneider: Hello and welcome to the Government Digital Service podcast. My name is Vanessa Schneider and I am Senior Channels and Community Manager at GDS. At GDS, we build platforms, products and services that help create a simple, joined-up and personalised experience of government for everyone. And as part of that work, we maintain GOV.UK, the website for the UK government. GOV.UK is used by millions of people daily. The home page alone is used more than two million times each week. We've been improving how people can navigate the site, taking a user-centred and evidence-based approach. We've previously written about this work on the GDS and Inside GOV.UK blog, and this podcast episode will be your latest instalment in documenting how we launched the new menu bar after an extensive A/B test and how we updated the GOV.UK homepage. It will also take a look at what lies ahead for making GOV.UK as simple as possible for people to use. Joining me to explore this today are Sam Dub and Jenn Phillips-Bacher, who work on GOV.UK in very different disciplines, but part of the same team. Sam, would you mind telling us a little bit about the team and then maybe what you do as part of it? Sam Dub: We're a team of 14, which in the scheme of GDS and the scheme of government is relatively small. We bring a whole range of different perspectives and expertise to this work that includes designers, developers, content people, researchers, and our job is to make it easier for people to find things on GOV.UK, and my role as a product manager is about making sure we're working on the right problems in the right way. We're getting to the outcomes for users that we want to achieve. Vanessa Schneider: Sam, thank you for that explanation of the team. Obviously, part of this as well is Jenn. Would you mind introducing yourself and what you do as part of the team to our listeners, please? Jenn Phillips-Bacher: I'm Jenn Phillips-Bacher, and I'm a content strategist on Sam's team. My focus is primarily information architecture and findability. So as a content strategist in the textbook definition of it, it's all about getting the right content to the right people in the right place at the right time. And that's why a content strategist is working on navigation. It's all about improving that mode of getting users to the content that helps them achieve a goal. Vanessa Schneider: Great, thank you to both of you. While it would be great if we could count on it, but not everyone will have been following the public journey of this work, even though we've blogged about it extensively. So would either of you mind recapping perhaps what's been happening? When did we start changing where users could find our information? Sam Dub: One of the challenges for GOV.UK is that the amount of content published grows every year. And today it's more than half a million pages, and it might just be one page in that half a million that a user needs. And so in order to find that page, there are, kind of, multiple tactics that they'll use. They might use a search engine, they might use GOV.UK site search, or they might browse through the home page, through a menu bar, through topic pages, to find what they need. And work on that topic system, making sure that users can browse successfully is the focus of our team. There's work going on elsewhere in GOV.UK in partnership with search engines, and there is work planned to improve our own search engine. But the focus for our team right now is browse and how we get that topic system, these menus, the home page, the breadcrumbs, and related links at a content page level, all working nicely together. So users can browse to find the stuff they're looking for. What you've seen go live over the last couple of months are the first kind of public steps of some work that's been happening for around the last year and those public changes have been changed to the GOV.UK home page and a change to the menu bar. So that's the black bar that sits across the top of every content page on GOV.UK. And that's more than half a million pages of the site. And that is GOV.UK's primary navigation. And we've, we put those changes live, we put homepage changes live in December and we put several versions of the new menu bar live in the second half of last year. Vanessa Schneider: So it's great that you've outlined what changes are taking place, but why was it necessary? Sam Dub: So the strategy here is about making stuff easy to find, and like, like all good GDS teams, we started with a discovery, and a discovery essentially means validating a hypothesis about a problem. And here it is about understanding what was going on, why people couldn't find things or why people were abandoning journeys on GOV.UK. And in the course of that discovery, we found 3 core problems that users were facing, and they were a confusing information architecture - now this is this is more Jenn's area of expertise and confusing information architecture is not a phrase that a user will come to you and say, "Oh, your information architecture is very confusing". It will be something that you'll notice a user lost within the site and not able to find where they need to be in order to get to the service or the piece of information that they need. So that was problem one. Problem two were issues on smaller devices. So these days, GOV.UK is used most often on mobile, and last year that was, three-quarters of all visits to GOV.UK came from a mobile device, and not all of GOV.UK's pages are optimised for mobile devices. And so that presented navigational problems, and there's a real opportunity there to move from an approach that kind of worked on mobile but wasn't ideal to something that really feels like it's designed for mobile devices, which is where most users are. And the third problem we looked at was an issue of overwhelm. So a lot of users to GOV.UK feel like it's just a lot of stuff. It's the most common phrase that we hear, the most common sentiment in user research will be, "This is a lot. This is too much. I'm not, I'm not quite sure what I'm looking for here". And so in a lot of the design work we've been doing, we've been looking at how to get back to the core principles of GOV.UK that are about a simple, clear experience to make it easy to find things. Vanessa Schneider: Sam mentioned that as a content strategist, you, Jenn, might have some experience with how to resolve confusing information architecture or sort of what kind of problems that can cause. Would you like to maybe speak to that, Jenn? Jenn Phillips-Bacher: Sure. So information architecture is one of those phrases that you'll get a different definition of it, depending on who you talk to and what their experience is. So I think in my work within GDS, I'm thinking about information architecture as being the bone structure of the website. A good information architecture isn't really something that you point to or see. It's something that is that scaffolding that supports the entire information space so that people can find what they need. And, and it all kind of depends on the raw materials that you have. So what kind of content you have, what kind of data and metadata that you have about that content, whether you've got images, video and so on. So I always think about the UX and information architect Louis Rosenfeld. He talks about there being three tracks of information architecture, and this is where it fits in with GOV.UK. He talks about top-down navigation. So that's the things like the global menu and the user interface components you might see on a home page. And what that does is it kind of anticipates an interest or a question that a user might have when they arrive. The second thing is bottom-up navigation, so that stuff, like bread crumbs or related content links or 'you might also like'-type suggestions or any kind of contextual navigation with content - that might mean like titles and page headings, or even links embedded inside of blocks of text. And then the third thing is, is the big one, and that's search. So that's really for handling those really specific information needs. So the information architecture is kind of this interplay between top-down, bottom-up, and search. And it's that whole, that holistic information architecture that we're starting to make some significant improvements on GOV.UK. Vanessa Schneider: Makes sense that we want to take care of this. So, yeah, menus and topic pages, they must play a big role in the user experience from what you've just shared. But making changes to how users interact with them, that would have made a bit of a difference out of the blue, no? How do you test this effectively without maybe negatively affecting users because it must be a bit challenging in a live environment? Sam Dub: So that's a really great question, and I think something that we're quite careful about. We know that for people finding, finding what they need it is a kind of critical task and GOV.UK is part of a whole bunch of essential processes in people's lives. And whilst we want to make stuff easier, there would be significant consequences to making stuff worse. And so we start with quite an extensive process of research before we make any change on the live site. We'll develop prototypes and then introduce those to users in a kind of test scenario in usability research. And a lot of, a lot of ideas often don't make it past that stage. You your your expectations about what will work, they kind of improve over time. But still, there's a pretty high ratio of stuff that when it meets contact with a, with a user, you'll suddenly discover unexpected problems with it. And so we try and catch that stuff early. And then when we do introduce changes to the live site, we want to use a kind of experimental method. We want to make sure that the change doesn't look simpler, but it actually works better. And that's where we'll use a technique called A/B testing or multivariate testing. And what that essentially means is comparing the performance of two different designs. We do that by users opting in to measurement on GOV.UK. When you accept cookies on GOV.UK, you have the option to accept measurement. And what that means is that at scale we can see how the site is being used. When we introduce a new design, we can compare how the new design is being used versus how the old design is being used. What that then allows us to do is look at certain key metrics and, for example, a new menu bar, we would want to see that a new menu bar is being clicked on, and that would be one very simple metric to see whether it was being recognised as a menu and whether it was being used. We would want more sophisticated stuff than just being clicked on. We would want to see a good user journey across the site, so users opening the menu bar, selecting an option and then successfully navigating down to a piece of information or a service. And we can look at those patterns of journeys across the new design and the old design and see which is more successful with users. So this process removes the, the choice out of this process, the, the bias out of the process, we just see what works for users. That's what we go with. Vanessa Schneider: I was wondering, were there any adjustments to what you were testing with users based on how they were responding to your A/B testing? Sam Dub: The way we will work on a design for an element as important as a site wide menu bar: very rarely will it be once and done, so it'll be a process of continuous iteration where we're looking at data. And sometimes the changes are significant and sometimes they're smaller. But there are quite significant differences from the first version of the menu bar we put live, changes to the content, changes to the interactions. And I would imagine it's continuing to refine that over the next few months. What tends to happen is that at the beginning, the changes are quite major. And then over time, you move into a process of polishing the design and you're making smaller and smaller changes and smaller optimisations. And we're getting that with the menu bar, I'd say we're at a point where there might be a couple of little content tweaks we want to try, but we're pretty much there we think. Vanessa Schneider: Jenn, how does your insight as a content strategist feed into the menu bar? Jenn Phillips-Bacher: What I'm thinking about is the understandability of the system as a whole, so can people understand the information that is being presented to them? One thing we look at is understandability of labels. And one of the ways that we can do that is a quantitative piece of research method called tree testing. And what that effectively does is allows us to look at a user's click journey through a hierarchical structure. So our, our existing topic system as an example is hierarchical, you use it to narrow down to a set of more granular categories. So we can use tree testing to understand whether the entry points are understandable for people. Are they going down the right path to begin with? Did they get lost once they're inside of that structure? And in that way we can identify where, where people are getting lost, where we might need to make changes to the language that we're using and where we need further qualitative investigation because we can't, we can't know everything from the quantitative. Often tree testing opens up a whole new set of questions that we actually want to ask humans face-to-face. So it's good fodder for ongoing research, which again feeds into the iterative development of things like the menu bar and the topic system. So it isn't, it isn't right until we know that users can find what they need where they expect to find it. Vanessa Schneider: And does the tree testing run in the background of the A/B testing or is it something that needs to be set up separately? Jenn Phillips-Bacher: Tree testing is set up separately from A/B testing, and the way that we are doing it at the moment is through a banner across certain sections of the website. So when we have a tree test that's live, you're likely to see it within the topic structure or other pages within the website. Vanessa Schneider: Great, so that sounds like a really non-invasive way for you to get data on how people are progressing through their journeys without them needing to reveal anything about their personal details. And obviously, as big proponents to agile, it makes sense that we're having a very iterative approach. I was wondering if that was transferable to other parts of our mission to improve navigation because we've talked extensively now about the menu bar, but obviously, that's not been the only area of activity. Sam Dub: So another area where we're making these kind of evidence-based changes is to the design of core components of the website. And one place where you can see a change that we're really proud of is on the GOV.UK home page, where you see all the topics listed out, the area of the site that you as a user need to click on is now substantially larger. And you might think, 'Well, it's a small change, and it's just, maybe, a design tweak to make the page feel more, kind of, better spaced out'. The change is much more significant than that and actually comes from a different set of user needs. This is about using the website with touch. So users, particularly on smaller devices, I'm sure we've all had the experience of, like, struggling to tap on a link on certain websites. We've all had that experience, maybe where we clicked on the wrong thing, because when you're trying to tap on a link, it's difficult to tap on the right one. Those problems are magnified if you are on a smaller device or maybe have a tremor or a motor impairment. And that, that can be the difference between being able to successfully complete a task on mobile and basically having to abandon and either use a different device or ask someone else to do it for you. So it's quite an important change for us across the site to make these targets so that you have to tap on or click on in order to navigate through the site significantly larger. And we feel that is a good thing for everybody. It should make the website easier and quicker to use on mobile and more accessible in the process. So accessibility, mobile usability, are core principles of the pages, including the home page that we're going to be redesigning as part of this process. Vanessa Schneider: Sounds like we're on a roll. This kind of work, we've mentioned it before, is never done. So what is next on the agenda for us? Jenn Phillips-Bacher: So a key part of simplifying our information architecture is working toward improving our topic system, making sense of what we call topic browse. So in GDS lingo, we often talk about mainstream browse, and that's what you see on the home page at the moment. And it's the topic-based part of GOV.UK that includes the top categories you might use to browse to content like 'passports, travel and living abroad', or 'working, jobs and pensions'. So they're quite broad categories that contain all of the content that supports top tasks, so the things that most users are going to want or need to do. For example, like applying for a passport or checking your state pension age, so very task-oriented. But in parallel with that, we have something that we often call specialist topics or specialist sectors. And they're similar, similar to mainstream browse in a way, but it doesn't have a predictable home in the same way that mainstream browse does. So that means that users, who are looking for more in-depth information relating to their business or industry or they're working in some kind of advisory or professional capacity, can't navigate to that content without using search. And what's interesting about these two systems is that they kind of do some of the same things, they're hierarchical and there's an element of curation. So content designers or publishers are deciding which of the content in those topic areas is most important and should be prioritised for individual user needs. So what we're looking at doing at the moment is consolidating these two topic structures into a single browse layer for GOV.UK. So that will allow people to get to a broader range of content, and it will do a better job at reflecting the full breadth of content published on GOV.UK. We currently have about 650,000 content items, or pages, which is huge. It is huge [laughs]. And we're only really surfacing a small fraction of that within mainstream browse. Sam Dub: What we're working on over the next couple of quarters is to combine these two topic systems into a single definitive browse system that will allow users to find anything that they need on GOV.UK. And that's a real design challenge because what we don't want to do is overwhelm users. What we want to do is make sure there's a route to everything the people need without it feeling like there is this huge volume of content for them to wade through. And so we're working very hard on design patterns, using some of the latest thinking within GOV.UK Design System, like accordions, like the grid patterns that you have seen on the new home page. And we're working to make sure that there are simple routes to information and services. But there are also the people who need it, ways they can dig a bit deeper and they can get to the specialist content as they need it. Vanessa Schneider: So if users have become interested in the work that you're doing, is there any way for them to engage with it? And I mean users, whether they are the end-user, as in a citizen that is going through the process of navigating a journey, or even teams that are running services in government that might be more of a middle person, and they want to improve how their content appears to users. What can they do to get in touch with you and how can they help? Sam Dub: So if you're a user of GOV.UK and you're inside government, if you're a civil servant, you can get involved and and talk to us through the cross-government content community, so there's a cross-government Basecamp that you can join and we'll be doing any call-outs for participation and collaboration across government using that channel. And if you're not a content designer, you can talk to your nearest friendly content designer within your department or the managing editor. Each department and agency, I believe, has a managing editor. And they're a great, kind of, point of contact between you and GDS and our work. You can also keep up to date on Inside GOV.UK. We're doing our best to work in the open on this and blogging about forthcoming changes through there. And if you're a user, and you are listening to the GDS podcast, you, the blog should be a really good sense of what's what's coming up. But we hope also, for you. That this is a pretty seamless experience, that we don't expect these changes to disrupt anybody. They will be iterative over the coming year and gradual. And because of the evidence-based way that we're working in terms of the user experience, it should be one of iterative improvement because we realised that for so many people, GOV.UK is critical to their jobs, to their livelihoods. And we're careful about how we're iterating. We want to make consistent progress, but we don't want to disrupt everybody in the process. Jenn Phillips-Bacher: Over the last quarter, we've been collaborating with content teams from HMRC and DWP to test some of our assumptions. And those have been really fruitful and helpful discussions because it's demonstrated to us some of the areas where government publishers might have a slightly different perspective to GDS in terms of how people are navigating the site. And we've learnt a lot about users who use HMRC and DWP services. We're also aware that some departments with active user research communities are also doing tree testing, and that's somewhere where we could really learn from each other. Understanding the mental models of users who use content that is being produced by each of these departments. And over the coming months, we will also be reaching out to departments and agencies via managing editors to review the specialist topics or specialist sector pages that you have on GOV.UK. And we will support those teams with making any changes that are necessary in order to get them to fit into the new topic system. If you're currently working in government and working on things like topic systems or tree testing of your own content, get in touch. We'd love to hear what you're working on and what you're learning. If you're a person who works in content or works with content, whether you're a content designer, UX writer, content strategist, information architect, content architect: GDS is a great place to work and develop your career and we're building up our content strategy practice a bit more. So even if you don't see a job title that looks quite right, please have a look at the job description and think about transferable skills. Our content strategy team is made of people who've worked in fintech, libraries, social media, journalism. So even if you think you don't fit the title, do have a look at the job description. Vanessa Schneider: So it doesn't get more straightforward in terms of calls to action than what you've both shared with us. We'll have the contact details on Jenn's research with other departments in the blog post, and you can subscribe to the Inside GOV.UK blog by visiting [insidegovuk.blog.gov.uk] and on the right side bar, you can find options to subscribe to the blog. And if you're more in the mood for listening, you can find all episodes of the Government Digital Service podcast on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, and all other major podcast platforms, while the transcripts are available on Podbean, goodbye. Jenn Phillips-Bacher: Goodbye. Sam Dub: Goodbye.

Why build a product people won't or can't use? Our user researchers share their approach to understanding needs for government's single sign-on. ---------   The transcript of the episode follows:   Vanessa Schneider: Hello and welcome to the Government Digital Service podcast. My name is Vanessa Schneider and I am Senior Channels and Community Manager at GDS. In August, we recorded an episode on digital identity and single sign-on as part of our plans to develop one inclusive and accessible way for people to log in to all government services online. You heard from Will and Helena from GDS, as well as Tom from Veterans UK, who shared how we worked with other parts of government to shape this work. Since then, we passed the digital identity service assessment, integrated our authentication component with the first service, and completed research with more than 800 end users. And it's that research that we want to talk about today. Joining me in this are Lauren Gorton and Charlotte Crossland, both user researchers at GDS in the Digital Identity Programme. Lauren, could you please kick us off by introducing yourself and what you do? Lauren Gorton: So I'm Lauren. I'm a user researcher on the digital identity programme in GDS, and specifically I work in the authentication team. We look at the credentials that people use as part of the single sign-on. And the first steps of our journey went live in October. So specifically, I focus on the end user aspect of that and focus on the citizen side. Vanessa Schneider: Fantastic, thanks. Charlotte, could you please introduce yourself and what you do as well? Charlotte Crossland: Absolutely. Hi, everyone. I'm Charlotte, I'm a user researcher on the digital identity programme, working in the design for adoption team. We've been doing a lot of research with service teams across government. We're building an authentication onboarding journey, as well as looking at identity materials that teams can use to make decisions. Vanessa Schneider: Fantastic, thank you so much, both. So, not everyone will have listened to the previous podcast episode or read the blog posts that we've written about this work. Would one of you mind explaining a bit more about One Login for Government? Lauren Gorton: Yes, so One Login for Government is one of the government's major projects at the moment. On GOV.UK there, there are several different sign-ins at the moment, and many different routes users could take. So what we're trying to do is streamline that down, so that in the future, there'll just be one single sign-on for GOV.UK to help improve the journeys for users and reduce confusion for people. That then opens the door to do lots of other cool things in the account space, so that people aren't having to repeat themselves too often in different services, and it helps government to basically join up a bit better. Vanessa Schneider: Great stuff. I can see the importance in that [laughs]. Obviously, this is a loaded question to ask, given both your roles as user researchers. But I was wondering why is user research so integral to that? Lauren Gorton: So there's no point in building something if people won't or can't use it. And the only way we know if we're on the right track is if we actually speak to the people who are the intended users. That's probably important for any organisation or business, but it's especially important in the context of government, given how important government services are if people can't access them, that can have a huge impact on people's lives. So we can't really afford to build something which people either can't use or won't use. [For] the citizen side of the research, our approach is to gather insights at all stages of the projects and from as representative a sample of people as possible. One thing is that we're not reinventing the wheel. There have been other government projects that have come before us who've done work on sign-on services. So there's a lot of existing research and insights that we can sort of learn from as a first step. So we, we initially did some very extensive desk research, including research artefacts from Verify, Government Gateway, recent COVID[-19, coronavirus] projects, and, you know, getting lessons learnt from peers in the NHS, who are working on the NHS login at the moment as well. So it's kind of given us a running start, really, to see what worked well before us and what didn't work so well. And we then built on top of that with our own research. So for a variety of different techniques, things like doing interviews with people and conducting surveys, testing our journeys as we develop them and iterating them. And since May, despite the impacts of COVID and issues that we had with research - we obviously haven't been able to go out and actually talk to people face-to-face, we've had to adjust how we work and do everything remotely - but despite that, yeah, we've managed to speak to over 800 end users, as you mentioned, since May. On top of that, it is really important to call out that once something's live, it's not live and then done, so now that we're live with the first steps of authentication, we've also got thousands of users who are now going through the live service and we're getting insights from those people as well. So relying a lot on our feedback form and also the analytics that runs for our service to better understand, "OK, so these are real people, using it in a real-life scenario: how is it working for them, and working, we keep improving it." So it's kind of that balance of we're doing a lot of the research with people to help prep them, optimise before we go live. And then as it's live, we're still monitoring it and trying to improve. Vanessa Schneider: Well, there's a lot of work going into it, I can see, and it's really heartening to hear that you're taking on the lessons from the past. And actually, that probably relates to the work that we're doing with other departments because they have existing identity solutions, don't they, Charlotte? Charlotte Crossland: Yeah, absolutely. So our approach from gathering insights from service teams in government has been a bit different from doing research with end users - it's a bit of a different dynamic. The real key to this is collaboration. So like other government platform products our users are peers working across government. I've been working with a range of roles, from product people to service owners, researchers, designers, developers, even data [analysts], both across central and local government. And it's been really fundamental to tap into, again, the existing work that's there; digital identity is a well-trodden area across government. It's a fundamental, it's been creating a space of trust and being as open as possible with teams and departments. It's important that we take aspects of that into our approach, not only internally within the programme, but taking that approach externally across government. Yeah, if the whole team is supporting and involved in that session, we have the capabilities and materials to produce really rich, UR [user research], building up that trust and developing relationships is far more important because they're the teams that are building and developing the services themselves in their everyday lives. Vanessa Schneider: Obviously service teams will have also conducted user research for their services with end users. How did that integrate into sort of your knowledge base? Lauren Gorton: Yes, so that was a part of the desk research that we did, kind of, in Discovery Alpha. We went through hundreds of different documents to, to try and understand that. But, as well, we've also since had sessions with teams so, the basic digital service, so they have a really good component for certain aspects of the authentication journey. So we're trying to make sure, again, we're not reinventing the wheel. So if things have worked for, for their end users, it's going to work for [our] end users as well. So we've been, we've met with them, tried to understand the component, looked at some of the data behind it and have applied that, aspects of that, to our own journeys as well. Vanessa Schneider: Neat, and obviously, this could be really interesting for folks, depending on how long we're going to be in these unprecedented times or with the future of work being maybe more remote working: How was it conducting user research while maybe not having direct access to people? Lauren Gorton: Good question. So, yeah, that's, that's been difficult. I think it was definitely for user researchers, just in general. It's hard if, you know, you're not in the room with them. And something that user research just needs well to do is to have, like, a good rapport with the participants. And it can be hard to try and build that up remotely and so, you know, reassure people and calm them down remotely over a video call. So, yeah, there are different frustrations to it, particularly if someone runs into an issue in the middle of a session. We can see the screen and what they're doing. But if they go onto a different device because they want to search something on the mobile phone, we can't see what they're doing and we can't help them, so that's caused challenges as well. So it's been a big challenge for communication, I think. But there are, there are positives to it as well. It's quite nice to have a video call with someone, they dial in, you run the session, if it goes well, and then you can just dial off, that's the session done. You can go, go grab a coffee, [laughs] to then try and absorb what you've just learnt. So yeah, there are nice things to it as well. Charlotte Crossland: Yeah, definitely echo Lauren's point around that interaction, and no matter who you're researching with, whether it's citizens or service teams. It's really difficult to get that rapport up online compared to in-person, where you can read people's body language, their tone, it's a very different dynamic. And I think what's I've learnt the most about doing research with service teams is that they are our peers and, as we've mentioned before, digital identity is a well-trodden area, and it's about collaboration as much as it is user research with those power dynamics that are often associated with it. I think as well, on the analysis side, so we're really fortunate to have tools that really help bridge those gaps from doing analysis in-person to remote ways. They've yeah, they've been so valuable. Lauren Gorton: Charlotte's raised a really good point there as well, which I totally missed, but afterwards with our colleagues when we're trying to, like, go through what we've learnt in the session. That's been super hard as well because we're not all just sat around the table together with notes and writing on a whiteboard. So yeah, that's been a real struggle as well. Vanessa Schneider: I think that a lot of listeners can relate to the difficulties that you face, the challenges that have presented themselves. But it is nice to know that there are some things that have helped or some things that are manageable at least, despite the circumstances. So that's really encouraging. So it's great to see that we've got these partnerships going with other departments. How do these partnerships come about and why is that so important to us? Charlotte Crossland: Great question. So we're collaborating at multiple levels in government departments, so recently colleagues have kicked off strategic department-level work with the big departments and these will continue to be expanded on. We're also working directly with services at service team-level, as well as clusters of services, to give us a really wide and deep view of requirements. So we've been building on from the robust thinking that– of digital identity that already exists within government. The collaboration has shaped the programme thinking, so the development of the roadmap, the functionality requirements, to prioritise in specific work, such as exploring low levels of confidence, which our team is currently looking at. So, as mentioned before, in the previous Digital Identity podcast, as well as collaborating externally, we need to reflect internally and learn from Verify. So to do this, we're ensuring inclusivity is at the core of what we're doing. We're not using third-party or private sector identity providers to verify users' identity. We're not taking a one-size-fits-all approach. We're designing for the needs of service teams, so doing research with service teams has really sought to address these last two points. I think one of the key collaborations, for example, the one with DfE [Department for Education] has come about through one of our key findings, actually, so this is around cluster services. So end users of cluster services are likely to see the benefits of a reusable set of credentials more readily as they're able to use the same authentication username and password to access them. So we've spotted clusters in well-known departments like HMRC [HM Revenue & Customs] or the Home Office initially, but we've also found clusters in all sorts of places across government. So users of Companies House, [HM] Land Registry, farmers using Defra [Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs] services, drivers using DVLA [Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency] services, as well as teachers or students using DfE services. Lauren Gorton: Yes, so with our end user research, we've always been researching around the single sign-on and how that benefits our users. The single sign-on is the solution that we feel best helps to meet other user needs we found in research. But to do so in a way that also meets people's expectations and fits mental models as to how people look at government. So in terms of user needs, like, at its simplest level, our users need to be able to access government services, they come to GOV.UK with a task in mind, and that's kind of what they care about doing [laughs] and all they care about doing. They need to be able to do that without having to understand all the complexities of government and have to try to unpick that. So a user shouldn't have to land on the GOV.UK home page and say, "OK, today I'm trying to do this task. This service owns that task. This service sits in this department and that department uses this sign-in. So I need to go over there and specifically it's these credentials I have to use if I can remember what that-- what those credentials are". So, you know, users shouldn't have to do that. And it's not just the case, you shouldn't have to do it, but it also doesn't fit into how they look at government. So we found in our research, and this is general, because mental models, are general, not everyone thinks this way, but a lot of people, sort of, look at government and they see it as a single entity. We talk about "the" government and, you know, that, that's how people see it. They don't think about all the complexities behind it. And as part of that, we have heard people in research sessions and participants saying, you know, "I expect to just have the one account because I'm dealing with the government. I need a government account to talk to the government". So that's what we've, sort of, had coming out of our research sessions. And whilst we've heard that in research sessions prior to going live, again, since going live, we've also seen some data that also supports this too. So for instance, we have our feedback form, which people using the live service can come to. One of our most common themes in our feedback form is one we call "queries outside of our scope". And that's just basically for anything that's actually to do with a different service. So what we are seeing is a lot of people hitting our journey, going into our feedback forms, and they're leaving this feedback about different services or they're saying, "I can't sign in" and, you know, when we go back to them, we unpick it, it's because they're trying to sign in into, like, a Gateway or a Verify [account], because they want to do something with their tax, for instance, they've, they've come to us in error. So we are seeing in live that this confusion is a problem. It's the same with our analytics as well. We're seeing people coming to our journey, trying to sign in and having to go down those unhappy path routes because they're confused about whether or not they do have an account. And it's one of those things from a user perspective, that so long as there are multiple accounts out there, that confusion will exist to an extent. There's only so much we can do with research and design. So the more services we get onboarded and the more we reduce the number of sign ins, it's kind of the only way to really completely get rid of that confusion for people. Charlotte Crossland: Definitely, teams that have Sign-in already have seen account confusion from end users, it's a very well-known problem. I think, similarly to Lauren's point around service teams, so authentication and digital identity isn't a straightforward team need. So teams often integrate with identity as part of bigger changes and plans they're going through within their delivery cycle, but related to that. So checking people's identity documents is a really onerous process for service teams and government. It's really costly. Identity checks might not be up to scratch, so ultimately online identity checks could save teams a lot of time and money. It's also important to add to that, the offline routes will always be fundamental, so users and service teams will always need offline routes. Vanessa Schneider: Yeah, definitely important to stress we're not taking anything away from folks. We're just trying to make it easier. We're trying to make it, one, single safe, reliable, fast and effective way for everyone to log in to government services online. That's the mission. So earlier you mentioned trust, and then you also talked about how our new solution isn't going to use third-party providers to verify people's identities. Is that linked? Charlotte Crossland: Yeah, so on the identity side, our research has been really addressing exploring service team mental models around digital identity. So really digging into how teams feel and talk about identity, understanding the types of language that they use. Equally, we've been understanding how services decide on the level of confidence of an identity check. So who's involved in that decision-making process? What are the roles and teams in the department that are integral to this? And I think there's a really interesting design challenge of how we can effectively communicate how teams go about choosing an appropriate level of confidence that maps back to GPG 45, or the Good Practice Guide. There's a lot of evidence that shows GPG 45 doesn't equip teams to understand what identity profile or level of confidence is most appropriate. The guidance doesn't explain how this choice will affect a services' end user journey. That wasn't the aim of the guidance, but equally, the level of confidence the service chooses should be informed by the service's risk appetite. Vanessa Schneider: You did talk about your research reveals there are clusters, for instance, in different departments. Are we working with all of them? If not, why should departments be working with us? Charlotte Crossland: So it's really that sharing of knowledge and insights and that collaboration that can make digital identity a possibility in government, so teams, practical things that teams can expect from the partnership is like access to the technical documentation that we've been testing, so they've really got to shape what that looks like, they've been able to play around with it. How does that work in their integration environment? It's been really insightful for both parties involved. Vanessa Schneider: Well, in that case, I really hope more teams will register their interest in the private beta. As after all, as you said, you know, earlier adopters will reap greater rewards in the situation, really shaping what gets done. So Lauren, I know on your side specifically, there was quite an innovative approach with respect to how we use user insight to provide a full picture of the complexities of user lives. Can you explain a little bit more about what that involved? Lauren Gorton: So that was from our Alpha assessment. So, so during Alpha, rather than using personas, which are the traditional way to basically group your users, we used mindsets instead. So the difference really is that, whilst both tools are used to group your users, you can't focus, unfortunately, on everyone individually, we need a way to, to group our users so that we can see the different types of people using the service, and we can include those in the design process and refer back to it. Personas do that by quite heavily focussing on demographics. So you might create personas where you're having different age ranges from your users represented, represented, different ethnicities, gender - even things like do they have an access need? And then what you do on top of that is say, "OK, so what goals will these different types of users have when they're trying to use a product or service?" So that's how personas work with that very heavy demographic influence. Mindsets are different in that we don't think about demographics at all. Instead, we're trying to group our users based on shared behaviours and attitudes in a, in a particular situation. So mindsets focus much more on the different ways people might behave and the reasons which are driving those behaviours. So sometimes personas are the right tool to use, but there is a risk of things like stereotyping and subconscious bias. And to be honest, just in our, in our context, because our users are everyone in the UK plus international people it is kind of hard to use personas because we'd have to make tens of personas to try and represent that, which just wouldn't be manageable or usable. So we needed a different tool to approach grouping our users to make sure we were designing for everyone. And mindsets kind of naturally [laughs] for researchers are a way to do it. So specifically, we developed our mindsets during Alpha whilst we're doing initial prototype testing. We kept hitting this, the same problem in our journey, that at the point in our journey where we needed users to either create an account or sign in, we were seeing a lot of people choosing to sign in, which was just a bit odd because this was before we'd gone live. So obviously GOV.UK Account was a new account. In theory everyone should be choosing to create an account at that point. And when we spoke to people in the sessions to understand what was happening, what we realised was they were getting confused. They had existing government accounts like a Gateway account or a Verify account, and they were trying to use the credentials from those accounts to, to sign in at that point. They weren't understanding that this was a different type of account and many of the people and different teams in the project looking at different areas of single sign-on, they were seeing the same results as well. So we kind of knew it was a common issue. Naturally we tried to test lots of different variations of the journey to try and resolve that confusion. But the more we were looking at it, the more we could see, there were these, sort of, 5 common groups of participants that we could see coming out of it, and those were the groups that ended up becoming our mindsets. So these mindsets were basically focussing on how much previous experience these participants have of using government services and having government accounts - how confused would they then get at this point in our journey? And really importantly, how were they feeling about that and how were they reacting, what were they saying? So, for instance, participants with very little experience of government services, who didn't have previous accounts, they showed absolutely no confusion at this point in our journey, and their attitude was very much, "OK, fine. If this makes sense, what do I do next?" So those were our clean-slate mindsets, because effectively, that's, that's what that group of users were. But then on the other end of that spectrum, we have participants who, you know, they did have an existing account, like a Gateway account, as an example, and they used it quite frequently. And when they hit this point in our journey, they were getting really confused about what to do. They're trying to sign in, and they weren't understanding our error handling about why they didn't have an account and they were reacting really negatively to it. And there were different reasons why they were reacting negatively. But they kind of all revolve around the issue of single sign-on and the fact that we have multiple sign-ins and accounts that exist today. So for some participants it was the case of, they had a Gateway and it was the only account they'd ever needed because they'd only ever done stuff relevant for Gateway. So they thought that was a single sign-on, and they thought it was a single sign-on because they had the expectation they should only need one account when interacting with government. And for other participants, it was more the case of, they were just frustrated because they'd need to create another account. That's another set of credentials to remember. And they also need to remember where to use those credentials. So, yeah, we found these different groups coming out and ended up with five mindsets overall, which we were then using to input into our design process. Vanessa Schneider: So you mentioned the Alpha assessment. Can you share a little bit about the feedback that you received? Lauren Gorton: Yeah, so, so within our Alpha assessment. So we had another user researcher, one from Department for Education, who was our assessor for the user research aspect. So. They were very happy with the mindsets approach. They thought it was a good way to look at user needs and to try and understand our users. So we actually followed that up with a session where we kind of explained mindsets and they did another cross-session where we broke down user needs in a better way. So it was kind of turned into a cross-learning opportunity so that, that was, that was quite nice to do. Vanessa Schneider: Great, thank you for giving us this overview of mindsets. I was wondering how it might be relevant. How does it strengthen the understanding of complex user needs, maybe beyond single sign-on? Lauren Gorton: Yeah, definitely. So mindsets they're, they're not unique to single sign-on, they're a really nice tool to use if you want to group users in a different way to personas. So how mindsets were most helpful for us, is, you know, we had a problem that we were trying to understand better why this problem was happening, why people were behaving that way and the reasons driving it. So with our mindsets, they were really useful in designing error scenarios in particular. So we knew, “OK, we've got these groups of users. And at this point in our journey, this group in particular is going to struggle. And the reasons why they're struggling is this. So do we need to put content here to help? Do we need to change the design pattern? If we do that, is that going to impact a different group of mindset?” So it gave us that kind of better picture of how to design with our users in mind and also really help with our user needs as well. So we already had our list of user needs that we had insight on, so we could sort of look at those user needs and say, "OK, do any of these apply more strongly to different mindsets? Therefore, do we need to think about those needs more so when designing for this particular group" and in reverse, we could also say, "OK, now we have these mindsets and we're understanding a bit better why people are behaving the way they are. Can we now see new user needs that we missed before?" So yeah, it's a really nice tool to use that is a general tool. So it goes beyond single sign-on and is really a good way for other government teams to, to better understand the way people will behave and the reasons why. Vanessa Schneider: You've done user research with citizens now, you've done user research with other departments. How does it feed into the development of the programme? Lauren Gorton: Yes, so one of our next deliverables in the authentication team will be around account recovery journeys. To create a GOV.UK account, you need to link it to a mobile phone number so that you can authenticate with SMS codes. So when we went live with our MVP [minimum viable product] in October, we knew that account recovery was missing, as a gap for anyone who then loses access for their mobile phone. So it was kind of on our radar as being something that we, we knew we need to-- needed to address at some point after October. Since going live, we have our feedback form, which is one of the best ways for research to really feed into that sort of roadmap and what to work on next. And yeah, in our feedback form we're getting the feedback from people that they are hitting this issue. So that was something that was already planned to do because we'd identified it as a design gap. But the feedback form is helping us to say yes, no, this is definitely a right priority to pursue because people are experiencing that in live. And similarly, also on the themes of mobile codes: again, the feedback form data is also now telling us that the codes are an issue for anyone who lives in a poor signal area and people with international phone numbers, so that's helped us to identify, "OK, actually this is, this is also our next priority the team needs to pick up". So, yeah, we've done some extensive desk research on an alternative to mobile codes, including looking at the whole cyber aspect and security. And we're now doing the design work to introduce an alternative to SMS codes that we can add in as an option for anyone who's either struggling as, as they've told us in our feedback form or who just, they would prefer to use an alternate option. Charlotte Crossland: Yeah, so I guess our work feeds into both the authentication and the identity product, so our work stream is really committed to delivering and inviting service teams into that auth[entication] onboarding journey. So we're now accepting private beta partner requests for service teams and central government. We'll also be doing groundwork around how to add an account to that onboarding journey, and we'll be looking to publish the technical documentation live on the product page. We're also feeding into the identity stream of the programme as the identity onboarding journey will follow in the third quarter of 2022. So we're really doing that groundwork of developing materials to help teams make decisions around identity strengths, around levels of confidence. And this will ultimately play a central part to that identity onboarding journey. And I think it's not just a one-way approach, so we've been working with identity experts within the programme as well to create an identity tool which uses questions and answers to help teams understand what identity strength could be appropriate for their service. So that's helping us really to bridge that gap between the guidance that is already out there and helping teams make decisions and initial feedback from research has been really fascinating. So by translating some of the logic that GPG 45 sits on, we've been using that and turning it into a really more interactive and accessible format for teams. And we're seeing teams really play around with the tool, and it's really empowering them to consider what solution might be most appropriate for their service. And we're also seeing how these materials could help teams navigate conversations with security or risk teams within that department. Vanessa Schneider: Brilliant, so you had mentioned the registration for the private beta. How exactly do folks get involved? What are the steps they've got to go through? Charlotte Crossland: So the easiest way to get involved is to go to sign-in.service.gov.uk. You'll see the GOV.UK Sign-in product page and there'll be a section there saying "Register your interest". So whether you're interested in log-in and authentication or identity, you go to that form and fill it out and then we'll be in touch. And then from there, we'll do a half-hour chat to understand your service at a high level and you'll be then in our pipeline, where you'll be triaged to the relevant next steps. Vanessa Schneider: So if you're part of a service team in government and if all of this has piqued your interest, get in touch. And if you want to go back to the previous episodes on digital identity and other topics, you can listen to all episodes of the Government Digital Service podcast on Spotify, Apple Podcasts and all other major podcast platforms and the transcripts are available on Podbean. Goodbye. Lauren Gorton: Bye. Charlotte Crossland: Bye.

Comment les PDG des grandes entreprises françaises préparent-ils leur succession ? Quel enfant choisir ? Comment éviter les jalousies ? Et s'assurer que l'héritier ne détruira pas l'œuvre de toute une vie ? Dans ce deuxième épisode, Raphaëlle Bacqué et Vanessa Schneider nous racontent comment Bernard Arnault a encadré l'éducation de ses cinq enfants en attendant de décider qui lui succèderait, et comment la gestion de l'empire Mulliez est aujourd'hui partagée entre quelque 800 descendants.Un épisode produit par Jeanne Boëzec, réalisé par Amandine Robillard et présenté par Jean-Guillaume Santi.Archive : chaîne YouTube de l'école Polytechnique

Comment les PDG des grandes entreprises françaises préparent-ils leur succession ? Quel enfant choisir ? Comment éviter les jalousies ? Et s'assurer que l'héritier ne détruira pas l'œuvre de toute une vie ? Dans ce premier épisode, Raphaëlle Bacqué et Vanessa Schneider nous racontent comment François Pinault et Jean-Luc Lagardère ont préparé la transmission de leur groupe à leurs enfants, avec des résultats bien différents.Un épisode produit par Jeanne Boëzec, réalisé par Amandine Robillard et présenté par Jean-Guillaume Santi.Archive : « François Pinault n'a pas le temps » - Société Européenne de producion et France 5 (2009)